glnmario commited on
Commit
0929ca9
1 Parent(s): c1384fb

Create README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +30 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ task_categories:
3
+ - text-classification
4
+ language:
5
+ - en
6
+ tags:
7
+ - legal
8
+ size_categories:
9
+ - 10K<n<100K
10
+ ---
11
+
12
+ This is the **ECHR dataset**, a collection of 11.5K court cases extracted from the public database
13
+ of the European Court of Human Rights and further annotated by human experts. The dataset was
14
+ published along with [this paper](https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1424/) (pleae cite it
15
+ accordingly!) and can be donwloaded in its original form from [this website](https://archive.org/details/ECHR-ACL2019).
16
+
17
+ Each instance in this dataset is a court case. Each court case is annotated with the following properties (the columns of the dataframe):
18
+
19
+ * `partition`: a label indicating dataset partition this court case belongs to ("train", "dev", or "test")
20
+ * `itemid`: a code which uniquely identifies this court case
21
+ * `languageisocode`: an [ISO code](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_3166_country_codes) describing the language in which the case is reported
22
+ * `respondent`: the ISO code of the party being sued or tried (respondents are nation states)
23
+ * `branch`: the branch of the Court dealing with the case, indicating at which stage of the trial a judgement was made (it can be one out of "ADMISSIBILITY", "CHAMBER", "GRANDCHAMBER", "COMMITTEE")
24
+ * `date`: the date of the judgement
25
+ * `docname`: the title of the court case (for example, "ERIKSON v. ITALY")
26
+ * `importance`: an "importance score" from 1 (key case) to 4 (unimportant), denoting a case's contribution in the development of case-law
27
+ * `conclusion`: a short summary of the case conclusion (for example, "Inadmissible" or "Violation of Art. 6-1; No violation of Art. 10"
28
+ * `judges`: the name of the judges
29
+ * `text`: the facts brought to the attention of the Court
30
+ * `binary_judgement`: a binary label indicating whether an article or protocol was (1) or wasn't (0) violated