Artificial Intelligence and It’s Danger?
By: Salih Abdullah Şendil
Tags: Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Post Modern Philosophy, Risk Management

Technology has been improving more and more. Various new and developed features have been adding into human life. One of them is artificial intelligent. According to Euchnar, AI is a computer-controlled robot has functions like discovering sense, learning from previous experience (2019, p. 1). In the recent decades, AI use in current life has been put on the table because of the developments in related to AI. In spite of the fact that facilities of AI, it is quite controversial. Although it has been argued that AI use in current life impairs people, it provides various beneficial features since it increases the facilities for health sector and brings more jobs than it displaces while improving working conditions.

The first argument opposed to AI use into human life is that mistaken decisions by AI, yet AI tools provide more effective results compared to humans’ one. Proponents who think AI poses dangerous for human being argue for absence of practical attitude in health sector. They maintain that since the changing circumstances may require to improvise in some cases in short time. They further argue that probability of inaccurate treatments applied by AI are not remote.

However, contrary to risk of inaccurate treatments, implementation of AI in health sector has good news. PWC network states that, according to the American Cancer Society, there is a considerable proportion of mistaken results in mammograms. It brings about fifty percent of healthy women being informed they have cancer. On the other hand, AI is 30 times quicker and has 1% error rate (2017). It proves that AI gives feed back faster and better. Additionally, AI technology facilities to developing new drugs which could be key for terminal diseases. Moreover, involving AI for improving new drugs decreases the disproportionate wasting of money. Plecher highlights that, discovering a new drug completely costs more than $350 million on average. AI use for drug researching is new, and it has a great potential to cut not only the time to research but also their cost (2017). It is clear that AI use is quite beneficial and provides speed and accuracy.

The second dispute in regards to AI use in human life is that AI poses a risk because of displacing of jobs, nevertheless AI provides not only new jobs but also improved conditions. People who believe that AI is a risk for the current jobs say AI can displace humans from workplaces. They pursue that it may occurs a chaos in future because of employment imbalance.

According to chart graph about automation and its probability for replacing jobs conducted by BBC, AI will replace basic level jobs approximately 70%. Apart from that, jobs which is more complicated such as dental practitioners and senior professionals in education have a risk to be displaced around 20% (2019). Nonetheless, contrary to being a risk for jobs, AI use can create new work areas. In addition, working conditions will be improved because of AI can handle heavy labour. Despite the fact that AI will displace some jobs but it does not poses risk because AI will bring new jobs more than it takes. As Hiltbrant states, more than 130 million new jobs will be created by algorithms and machines while 75 million jobs will be displacing (2020, p. 4). Additionally, AI will play a big role to decrease work accident rate due to it will handle jobs with high risk and majority of people will have high level jobs. Therefore, AI is not a risk on humans in workplaces.

In conclusion, AI use in sectors as assistive technology clearly facilitate human life by providing more effective results compared to humans, and by creating numerous and better jobs. As it can be understood arguments mentioned above, AI is not a risk for humanity. It is a huge benefit to improve the human life and it should be used in various sectors.