Reasons To Reject The Germ Theory of Disease
Tags: Politics, Germ Theory Dogma, Coronavirus Update, Coronavirus, Virus

Introduction

For the last century, the Germ Theory of Disease has become the dominant scientific ideology and it is within this framework that Western medicine shapes its understanding of modern illnesses — ranging from measles to respiratory illnesses, including influenza. The modern medical industry divides illnesses in 2 separate categories: infectious and non-infectious. Illnesses like measles, influenza, smallpox and Covid 19 would be categories as “infectious” diseases whereas non-infectious diseases include cancers, genetic diseases and so forth.

The Germ Theory of Disease stipulates that illnesses are mostly caused by specific pathogens that are primary spread through human to human interaction, and also from species to another as in the case of Sars Cov 2. According to this theory, viruses invade our bodies, hijack our cells which then causes all the illnesses that are normally associated with pneumonias and influenzas and so forth. The opposing theory is the Terrain Theory of Disease — which stipulates that all diseases are causes by our environment and the foods that we eat — which both determine the overall terrain of our bodies. For example, an individual that regularly eats junk food, does not have an active lifestyle, lives in a developing country with general bad sanitation may not have the healthies bodily terrain. When your body’s terrain is too toxic, your cells will use bacteria to sweep the body of its toxicity. It is very likely that viruses are created by the cells for this very purposes. Scientists have observed throughout many decades how bacterium can change its shape by simply altering the blood’s environment.

Here is a graphic table explaining the main differences between the 2 theories:

Having gone over the basic differences between the 2 schools of through, I will now go over the 30 reasons I believe the germ theory of disease to be incorrect.

According to Dr. Stefan Lanka, viruses have never been isolated from either pure cell cultures or human cells. He states:

“The “bacteriophages”, correctly defined as incomplete mini spores and building blocks of the bacteria, have been scientifically isolated, while the supposed pathogenic viruses have never been observed in humans or animals or in their body fluids and have never been isolated and subsequently biochemically analyzed. To date, none of the researchers involved in this kind of work seems to have realized this.”

In addition, according to German Prof. Ludtke’s review of virology, at the early beginnings of virology, the majority of virologists always concluded that the structures they had mistaken for viruses turned out to be components of the cells and thus, they were only the result of the experiment and not the cause of the changes observed. After the discovery and characterization of the phages and after introducing the dogma that the nucleic acid was the genome of all cells and viruses, the consensus was born, according to which such viruses must exist in humans and animals as well. In 1992, the dogma stating that the nucleic acid is the genotype of all cells was retracted in the scientific community. The ‘viral dogma’ of pathogenic viruses, however, is still being promoted today to the harm of billions of people. Source:

https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf

2. With regards to food poisoning, bacteria cannot be controlled for in demonstrate as the sole cause of poisoning since bacteria is ubiquitous and the main component of the human digestive flora.

Salmonella — like all other types of bacteria — are ubiquitous and so are not invaders and cause of infection.

“The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Arkansas

Children’s Hospital did a recent study of 50 Arkansas homes where infected

children lived. They found salmonella-concentrations in 38% of the homes;

on doorsteps, vacuum cleaners, the refrigerator, and a pet lizard.

(Richmond Times Dispatch, July 19, 1999; “Salmonella Bacteria Often Lurks

Close By”.)”

So even according to the germ theorists, death by food poisoning is extremely rare and the toxic bacteria is likely an aftermath of the infection, not the cause. In general, germ theorists have no theories for foodborne diseases. In the lecture titled “An Introduction to Infectious Diseases” by Prof. Barry Fox, he admits that 80% of the time they have no way of determining the cause of

foodborne illness (Lecture 13 28m 5s rem., 26m 15s rem.)

This lecture has to be purchased online and so am not able to link the audio statement here.

“Now foodborne illness has three major causes: bacteria, preformed toxins and viruses. But in 80% of the cases of foodborne illness we don’t know which of the three is the cause. Simply because illness is so common we can’t investigate all the possibilities. People often ask me, ‘how do you know if you are sick from something that you ate?’ The general timeline of illness ranges from a few hours to a few days so there is no definitive answer.”

3. The amount of people that die from food poisoning every year are wild guesses and are likely government propaganda. We read from the same LA Times article:

4. Not only are bacteria not the cause of disease, they are actually the cure for disease! Dr. K. Brooks Low at Yale University and Dr. Sara Arab of the University of Toronto have successfully utilized bacteria, Salmonella and Ecoli respectively, in the treatment of cancerous tumors.

5. The overwhelming evidence of not only the ubiquity but the essential nature of bacteria to normal organism function has forced modern Germ Theorists into a never ending spiral of Special Pleading and moving the Goal Posts into un-falsifiability fallacies. We clearly see these tactics when a pathogen is constantly present in so called “asymptomatic” individuals as is the case with the current Covid 19 psyop. As discussed in Part 2 of my Sars Cov 2 series, Robert Koch had to abandon his original postulates after he discovered the viruses he was attempting to frame for illnesses were in fact ubiquitous.

6. Germ theorists will also tell us that bacteria is good in small amounts but become harmful when there are too many in the wrong places, like in the bloodstream. What exactly is “too populous”? What metric is used to measure this?

7. While the germ theory acknowledges that foreign toxins entering your body can make you ill, they also claim in the same vain that bacteria create toxins. This theory has been refuted many times over the past century or more. Bacteria are not invaders. Bacteria are a product of the body’s prima materia and are the primary agents the body uses to break down a toxin that has either been ingested, breathed in or injected into the body. Even under the most sterile of conditions bacteria abounds which proves bacteria does not invade the human body. Thus, not a result of invasion:

We also see that staphylococcus epidermidis — the bacteria that is supposed to cause staph infections — are also ubiquitous and are not invaders. We read on page 19 from the same work:

8. The human microbiome — which famous 19th century scientist and terrain theorist Antoine Bechamp calls “the microzymas” — are the the fundamental element of biological life:

“Surely that could be said for the whole of Bechamp’s microzymian

teaching, which we can, from his writings, sum up as follows: -The

mycrozyma is that which is primarily endowed with life in the organized being, and that in which life persists after the death of the whole or in any

excised part. The microzyma being thus the fundamental element of

corporate life, it may become morbid through a change of function and thus

be the starting point of disease. Only that which is organized and endowed

with life can be susceptible to disease.”

Bechamp or Pasteur? Hume, Ethel D., p. 171

“Disease is born of us and in us. -The microzymas may undergo bacterial

evolution in the body without necessarily becoming diseased. In a diseased

body, a change of function in the microzymas may lead to a morbid

bacterial evolution. Microzymas morphologically identical with and

functionally different from diseased microzymas may appear without a

microscopic distinction being possible. -Diseased microzymas may be

found in the air, earth, or waters and in the dejecta or remains of beings in

which they were once inherent. -Germs of disease cannot exist primarily in

the air we breathe, in the food we eat, or in the water we drink, for the

diseased micro-organisms, unscientifically described as ‘germs’, since they

are neither spores nor eggs, proceed necessarily from a sick body. Every

diseased microzyma has originally belonged to an organism, that is, a body

of some sort, whose state of health was reduced to a state of disease under

the influence of various causes which determined a functional change in the

microzymas of some particular centre of activity.”

ibid

We read on page 35 of the same book:

Thus we see that there no such thing as “bacterial toxins”. Bacteria can become poisoned when we digest, inhale or inject toxins into our bodies. In Lecture 10 of Professor Fox’s lecture, he states that we are actually doing a disservice to newborns by creating to clean of an environment:

“Now paradoxically, there are concerns known as the hygiene hypothesis that we are doing a potential disservice to the developing immune system by creating too clean of an environment. The developing immune system may need to be properly exposed to germs to function optimally. If the baby’s environment is too clean for example the production to T helper cells may not be adequately stimulated.”

This lecture has to be purchased online and so am not able to link the audio statement here.

8. According to German biologist Stefan Lanka — chief editor of the German science journal Wissenschaftplus — states:

9. As per my isolation article, no one to date has observed a virus penetrating another cell. As a matter of fact the description of a virus inherently precludes the idea that a virus could ever exist outside of a host cell. Viruses need to have a host cell in order to survive and multiply so how was it alive to be able to penetrate the cell in the first place? Viruses have no nucleus, no independent protein synthesis or generation of its own energy supplies, no cell wall, and no growth or cell division. Prof. Frederic S. Cohen from the Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois admits that viruses are not alive in his paper “How Viruses Invade Cells” :

“An individual viral particle, called a virion, is a far simpler structure than

a bacterium. It has often been questioned whether a virus is alive. It is

certainly not living in the everyday sense of the word.”

10. Please visit my isolation article on the changes made over the years to Koch’s Postulates. In addition, Prescott et. al. admit in their paper that “growth in pure culture” doesn’t equal to virulence in real life. We also read:

This pretty much translates to: “we need to amend the method we use to prove a virus is the cause of a disease because when we do it properly the virus doesn’t cause disease”.

10. Experiments that were conducted later in the 20th century continue to confirm the pleomorphic nature of bacteria in all forms of life. Prominent soil scientists and permaculture specialist Herwig Pommeresche has made similar observations with plant bacteria. We will read some excerpts from his book “Humusphere Humus: a Substance or a Living System?”

11. Australian virologist and Nobel Prize winner Sir Macfarlane Brunet, in his book “Genes, Dreams and Realities”, informs us that viruses can be found in virtually every cell to varying degrees and multiply more actively in tumor cells.

Pg. 134

12. Macfarlane also informs us that virologists use tumors for their cell culture, even though we can expect viruses to multiply greatly in said cells. Virologists choose cancer cells for their cultures, but then project their conclusions to normal cells.

13. Viruses are cell-waste carriers. They’re found in huge quantities in excretions of *both healthy and diseased individuals*, with larger quantities in the latter. They identify the waste, protect the body from it, and guide its journey towards the openings.

14. Virus — like genetic material (RNA) is often expressed from poisoned cellular tissue as an adaptive and defensive response to poisoning. There is ample evidence of this regarding the polio virus

15. When discussing the original SARS outbreak in 2003, biochemmist Howard Urnovitz stresses:

“I do not see a virus. I see a unique and complete rearrangement of genomic elements. For example, when I look at what is believed to be the gene sequence coding for the spike protein of this coronavirus, I see a complicated gene rearrangement of a region of human chromosome. As I did in our studies of Gulf War Syndrome, when I see gene rearrangements like this, I immediately search for an associated catastrophic environmental event that could have caused such genomic rearrangement.”

16. No macrobial cause has ever been established for any respiratory tract infections, such as pneumonia.

“Despite extensive laboratory investigations in patients with respiratory tract infections, no microbiological cause can be identified… In the past 3 years, several novel respiratory viruses… were discovered… PCR products (440-bp fragment of pol) were subjected to a melting curve analysis (65 to 95°C, 0.1°C/s) to confirm the specificity of the assay. Cloning and purification of His6-tagged recombinant N protein of CoV-HKU1. To produce a plasmid for protein purification, primers (5′-TTTT CCTTTT GCGGCC GCTT AAGCA ACAGA GTCTT CTA-3′ and 5′-CGGAATT CGATGT CTTAT ACTCCC GGT-3′) were used to amplify the gene encoding the N protein of CoV-HKU1 by RT-PCR.”

17. We have clear footage of bacteria being pleomoprhic, changing their shape and morphing into different types of bacteria according to their environment. For example, in this video, we see a rod shaped bacteria transforming into a coccus bacteria. The bacteria are heavily ‘terrain’ dependent and change according to the state of health of the host even taking on a fungal form sometimes. There is other footage of these occurrences. The New York Times put out a video of e-coli bacteria disintegrating when their environment changes and then reassemble when it is restored. In addition to further supporting the works of Dr. Bechamp and Bastien — as well as the general pre20th century view of disease — it demonstrates that “the pathogen is nothing, the terrain is everything”.

18. Moreover, Bechamp’s experiments showed the presence of bacteria in all healthy tissue; not the result of an external invasion.

19. Microscope observations, while useful, does not absolute proof. The electronic microscope cannot show an organism’s dynamic life process due to vacuum pressure and electron bombardment. Secondly, EMs can only show dead tissue and does not provide a biocharacterization of said organism.

20. According to mainstream science, viruses are never truly eliminated and remain dormant in our bodies. According to Encyclopedia Britannica, the “virus latency” can be activated by various factors ranging from all types of infections to emotional stress. This is simply special pleading fallacy.

21. Viruses were allegedly first seen in 1931. They were said to be particles, rather than a fluid, by Wendell Meredith Stanley. All that happened is that they saw a microbe, conceptually isolated it in their minds, interpreted it as a virus and then sold the world their protection from it in the form of pharmaceuticals and vaccines.

22. Bridges et. al reviewed evidence surrounding influenza transmission and found “no human experimental studies published in the English-language literature delineating person-to-person transmission of influenza”. Renowned British epidemiologist Edgar Hope-Simpson also noted that:

“epidemic influenza often propagates itself by a series of transmissions from a small number of highly infectious — but generally symptomless — latent carriers, briefly called into contagiousness by the ‘seasonal stimulus.”

According to the same Virology article, evidence of epidemic transmissions of influenza type illnesses is heavily reliant on the assumption of person A will automatically infect person B. This is known as an “affirming the consequent” fallacy. Jefferson et al. recently published a similar paper with regards to the evidence of transmissibility of Sars Cov 2 infection from one person to another and concluded the following:

“Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR…Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to have infectious potential.”

23. Viral preparation procedures (culturing) are composed of extracellular vesicles as well:

According to Gianessi et al., it is impossible to separate EVs from viral particles. The authors state the following in their article:

“The remarkable resemblance between EVs [extracellular vesicles, that is, exosomes] and viruses has caused quite a few problems in the studies focused on the analysis of EVs released during viral infection. Nowadays it is an almost impossible mission to separate EVs and viruses by means of canonical vesicle isolation methods, such as differential ultracentrifugation, because they are frequently co-pelleted due to their similar dimensions. To overcome this problem, different studies have proposed the separation of EVs from virus particles by exploiting their different migration velocity in a density gradient or using the presence of specific markers that distinguish viruses from EVs. However, to date, a reliable method that can actually guarantee a complete separation does not exist [emphasis added].”

This is because they most likely serve a very similar purpose and is also the reason that viral cultures contain EVs. I think this possibility needs to be seriously examined.

24. As you may tell, there is abundant evidence to suggest that viruses are also pleomorphic and most likely serve a specific bodily function and as such are an integral part of the human microbiome. Reese et al. mentions that infection with multiple herpes viruses, for instance, is an inextricable part of the human condition, to which more than 90% of humans are subject to. Because the ancestral herpes viruses infect birds, reptiles, and mammals, pioneering researcher and world-renowned expert in immunology, virology, and infectious disease, Dr. Herbert W. “Skip” Virgin IV states, “The herpes viruses have been studying you far longer than you have been studying the herpes viruses”.

25. I maintain that the influenza is one of the best evidence against the germ theory of disease. There is no evidence of the existence of a “flu virus” in the sense of a monolithic, disease vector existing outside of us, conceived as it is as the relationship of predator to prey. This reason is crucial and so I will go more in depth.

Hutchinson et. al describe viruses in the following matter:

“Viruses use virions to spread between hosts, and virion composition is therefore the primary determinant of viral transmissibility and immunogenicity.”

Virions are also known as “viral particles,” and they are the means by which viral nucleic acids are able to move and ‘infect’ living organisms. Without the viral particle (taxi) to carry around the virus DNA (passenger), it would be harmless; in fact, viruses are often described as existing somewhere between living and inanimate objects for this reason: they do not produce their own energy, nor are transmissible without a living host. And so, in this first line, the authors are making it clear that virion composition is also the primary determinant in how or whether a virus is infectious (transmits) and what effects it will have in the immune system of the infected host. This distinction is important because we often think of viruses as simply pathogenic strings of DNA or RNA. The irony, of course, is that the very things we attribute so much lethality to — viral nucleic acids — are not even alive, and can not infect an organism without all the other components (proteins, lipids, extra-viral nucleic acids) which are, technically, not viral in origin, participating in the process. This would imply that the parts of the virus that are not viral are vital to a virus’ ability to infect other cells. This, of course, is nonsense.

The authors of this paper actually examined the viron composition of the influenza virus. Their finding was that:

“the virions of many viruses are complex and pleomorphic, making them difficult to analyze in detail”

But this problem of the great variability in the virion composition of influenza is exactly why the study was conducted. They explain further:

“Here we address this by identifying and quantifying viral proteins with mass spectrometry, producing a complete and quantifiable model of the hundreds of viral and host-encoded proteins that make up the pleomorphic virions of influenza virus. We show that a conserved influenza virion architecture, which includes substantial quantities of host proteins as well as the viral protein NSI, is elaborated with abundant host-dependent features. As a result, influenza virions produced by mammalian and avian hosts have distinct protein compositions.”

In other words, they found that the flu virus is as much comprised of biological material from the host the virus ‘infects,’ as the viral genetic material of the virus per se. How then, do we differentiate influenza virus as fully “other”? Given that it would not exist without “self” proteins, or those of other host animals like birds (avian) or insects, this would be impossible to do with any intellectual honesty intact.

The authors in the study explain that these flu viruses share an underlying protein with exosomes:

“Finally, we note that influenza virions share an underlying protein composition with exosomes, suggesting that influenza virions form by subverting micro vesicle production.”

Here they are referring to their similarities with exosomes, which are naturally occurring virus-like particles that are produced by cells to send messages to other cells. Exosomes, like many viral particles(i.e. enveloped viruses) are enclosed in a membrane, and are within the 50–100 nanometer size range that viruses are (20–400 nm). They also contain biologically active molecules, such as proteins and lipids, as well as information-containing ones like RNAs — exactly, or very similar, to the types of contents you find in viral particles.

A number of scientists have put out a video explaining exosomes in layman’s terms (exosomes are also known as extracellular vesicles)

26. According to numerous scientists from all walks of life as documented in the “Virus Mania” book series by journalist Torsten Engelbrecht and forwarded by other doctors, none of the modern pathogenic viruses like HIV, Measles, H1N1, H5N1 (Avian flu), the original SARS Cov and so forth have been isolated.

27. Royal Raymond Rife invented his own microscope with which he saw bacteria, fungi and viruses transmute from preceding primordial organisms just like Bechamp stated. His invention was suppressed.

https://www.rife.de/what-has-become-of-the-rife-microscope.html?fbclid=IwAR3HA5uHIqlBG7MG0gzZLjBedmS7XcV1NnL4ZQLbwixDWeCRCSBnqkxpezU

Here is a clip from a Dutch documentary titled “The Mysterious Microscope” in which researchers from the University of Toronto’s Rife Research Group state that the Rife microscope was able to view viruses in their living forms, unless EMs which can only capture dead matter in a snapshot.

Royal Rife published a report in the Smithsonian Institute in 1944and he describes his findings:

“In reality, it is not the bacteria themselves that produce the disease, but we believe it is the chemical constituents of these micro-organisms enacting upon the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human body that in actuality produce the disease. We also believe if the metabolism of the human body is perfectly balanced or poised, it is susceptible to no disease”

28. Famous British statistician, and founder of modern nursing Florence Nightingdale has personally witnessed the progression of smallpox in patients and not once did it ever infect surrounding. Nightingdale herself was often very close to sick patients with the illness without any modern PPE and never fill ill. The following pages are from the book Pasteur, Plagiarist, Impostor: The Germ Theory Exploded, pp 14–16

29. According to biochemist Harold Hillman — former Director of the Unity Laboratory of Applied Neurobiology — major problem with EMs is that they are cherry picked parts of an “isolate” to support the idea of a pathogenic virus causing harm to the body. Many are modified or computer generated images. Photos are shown without studies referenced. The data doesn’t support the virus model, so the data is reinterpreted to fit the model. His summary can be viewed in this article.

http://pro-decizii-informate.ro/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Prof-Harold-Hillman-Cell-biology-at-the-beginning-of-the-21st-century-is-in-dire-straits-2011.pdf

30. The issue of virus isolation is like kryptonite to the capitalist medical establishment. The authors in this Virology article claim the words “isolation” and “isolate”, “have no specific definition”.

Can people please stop asking us to isolate viruses!!

31. Even in the unlikely event that viruses were proven to exist and found to be predatory acellular microbes, that would only be a laboratory artifact, because the laboratory scenario is highly artificial, and the “diseases” produced, in lab mice and cell lines, generally do not resemble the disease being studied. According to scientist Claus Jungeblut, the modern process of proving the lethality of a virus by observing the cytopathic effect can simply a laboratory artifact for the reasons mentioned above (the source of a copy of the original NCBI article, which is paywalled)

32. As you have become aware through my articles, virologists check to see if a cell dies once viral particles are inserted in the culture and use this as evidence of said virus’ pathogenicity. However, experiments with the measles virus tell us a different story. According to Bech et al., the cytopathic effect is most likely caused by other factors as they noticed that the effect was not measles specific. They state:

“cytopathic changes similar to those caused by measles virus may be observed also in uninoculated cultures of monkey kidney tissue (Fig. 4–5). These changes are probably caused by virus-like agents, so called ‘foamy agents’, which seem to be frequently present in kidney cells from apparently healthy monkeys.”

33. According to a research article published by the Integrative Molecular Biology and Biotechnology,

“the cause of oxygen deprivation of blood and lungs, red blood cell degeneration, DIC, thrombosis, hypoxia, severe acute respiratory syndrome or SARS-CoV and sudden death is due to decompensated acidosis of the intravascular fluids and the interstitial fluids of the Interstitium organ”.

34. Prominent British virologist James McCumisker claims that disease causing pathogenic viruses have never been isolated. (article retrieved from the old Idaho Observer)

35. Most bacteria and bacterial “infections” don’t originate from an external source. That intracellular and extracellular bacteria are synthesized by our bodies in response to a specific poison/s in tandem with corresponding organs, in the same manner as proteins and enzymes. Severson et al., make this argument as well.

36. Research by the scientists who participated in the National Institute of Health Human Microbiome Project (HMP) discovered that only 43% of our bodies consist of human cells. The other 57% are microbiota, more commonly called “germs:. The researchers from the HMP state:

“The microorganisms that live inside and on humans (known as the microbiota) are estimated to outnumber human somatic and germ cells by a factor of ten. Together, the genomes of these microbial symbionts (collectively defined as the microbiome) provide traits that humans did not need to evolve on their own. If humans are thought of as a composite of microbial and human cells, the human genetic landscape as an aggregate of the genes in the human genome and the microbiome, and human metabolic features as a blend of human and microbial traits, then the picture that emerges is one of a human supra-organism.”

37. As we see in this EM taken from a Sars Cov 2 patients, we actually see the virus growing inside the cell. In this video, we see that the virus does not actually jump from one cell to another but rather moves around the same cell structure. Both of these observations are perfectly in line with the terrain theory of disease. Viruses are one of the mechanisms which assist our cells in cleaning up whatever toxin has insulted our inner terrain.

38. Biologist Stefan Lanka criticizes the process of pathogenic virus isolation

More recently, he has began control experiments which prove that the CPE (cytopathic effect, death of the cell) is not cause by any pathogenic, but rather the conductions in which the cell culture is put under.

39. Interesting video of cell-cell fusion after poisoning with antibiotics and deprivation of nutrients by 80%. This cell-cell fusion is misinterpreted as the presence of an alleged “virus”. This is the scientific basis for prosecuting all virologists who tell fairy tales about alleged “viruses”. This video is the premiere insight into a scientific publication ( Professor Olivier Schwartz ) that has not yet been published. Of course, we know from experience that virologists never document a control experiment (although they do mention “controls” sometimes).

Professor Olivier Schwartz sent a microscopic video for CPE to the nanolive.ch. His wish is to show us what this alleged virus is doing. The mentioned professor unintentionally provided insights into the behavior of laboratory cells after antibiotic poisoning, as well as insights into a new view on life — which Lanka describes in the following terms

“Through today’s techniques of living tissue observation, it turns out that tissues themselves are alive, contain nuclei and bacteria that move freely within them. At their edges, tissues form tissue cut-offs, from which new tissues can emerge, but also stem cells, which then form the actual free cells. The large part of “cells” are in fact tissue constrictions that are intimately connected and have only been misinterpreted as single and freely moving cells due to previous representation techniques”

Virologists use cell cultures. Cell cultures represent disintegrated tissue (in a large number of cases). This interesting video shows how “cells” try to connect with each other because they were forcibly separated by virologists. In any case, here is the nanolive video

I would also strongly advise the reader to watch Hillman’s documentary on the Fine Structure of the Living Cell

40. In 2016, the same Stefan Lanka was able to conclusively show in a German high court that the existence of the measles virus has not been proven in a scientific publication. The court statement reads: