One world government?
By: Tj Mclaughlin
Tags: Communism, Decentralization, Globalization, Information Technology, United Nations

United Nations? Not really.

One world government?

Could that really be a thing?

If so how could it be established?

A world run by the United Nations?

A world presided over by Marxists?

World domination has been the prime motivation and ultimate goal of every communist from Marx and Engels to Obama and Pelosi.

From my perspective here in the USA the push toward an authoritarian global government seems to be a symptom of a certain faction of radical leftists within western democracies. A futile myopic euro-centric fantasy that most of the rest of the world would most likely reject with extreme prejudice.

Are the nations of Islam going to relinquish their sovereignty in favor of being ruled over by a godless bureaucracy? No. Would China submit to being subsumed under a UN rubric? No. Xi has his own vision for world domination. And China is in the process of installing a bevy of new nuclear missile silos as a deterrent to anyone who might want to challenge its sovereignty or its imperialistic ambitions. And then there’s Putin with his nuclear arsenal. He Is not about to step aside and give up his ultimate goal of reinstating the USSR.

Also, as we see, individual countries are incapable of uniting their own populations. But they would be somehow capable of uniting the whole world? Of course not.

But, really, there is no interest in uniting anything by anyone.

In the USA the radical left is not interested in uniting the country. It is weaponizing political power to engineer a complete takeover by force.

The nations of the world are not united either and they are not about to be. So, in order to create a one world government run by the so-called United Nations it would have to be by force.

The push toward a global government is a push toward the next world war tempting a nuclear holocaust.

But such a holocaust could also come about when Iran succeeds in producing its own nuclear weapons, which they are on their way to doing. Iranian Mullahs believe that their Messiah, Mahdi, has been hiding out at the bottom of a well for some 1300 years and will come out of hiding to save the world for the Shiites only after the world is destroyed. So, Iran will need no provocation at all to instigate a global conflagration.

We see a world now where all parties are only interested in their own blinkered dogmatic mindset. From nation states to political parties to individuals myopia is endemic. It’s a world where no one can see beyond their ideological noses. Quasi global visions have to do with insular state actors only interested in pursuing their peculiar designs for global, or at the very least, regional dominance.

How cooperation between nations can serve the interests of every nation is not considered.

Imagine what could have been accomplished if at the start of space explorations the nations of the world had decided to cooperate in that endeavor? If there had been an International Space Agency formed in the seventies with nations pooling resources there could have been manned missions to mars by now.

There is much to be gained through international cooperation and only catastrophic loss through international conflict.

And that also goes for nation states as well. But the factional conflicts running rampant within them prevent any notion of cooperation from serious consideration.

It is as if our minds have been shut down. Most likely because of information overload via computer technologies.

Overwhelmed by information on a minute by minute basis we become prisoners to the present and lose a big-picture-context that would enable a broader perspective. No time for reflection we rely on prefabricated mindsets by which we can immediately react to all the info bits we are constantly bombarded with.

Computer technologies favor, if not require, even demand decentralization. And the world needs to become a decentralized synthesis. The world cannot be managed on a global basis. Communities can be managed within a global context, thinking globally acting locally.