发财日记▷完整版本~(2021-HD)~在線觀看完整版本【Dreams of Getting Rich】在线观看电影〚HD.1080p〛
By: Ruti Were
Tags: Médium, Canadian, Thailand, Japanese Language

◉ 🎬 [現在觀看] ➥ https://t.co/JX8i8NpkpY?amp=1

◉ 🎬 [現在觀看] ➥ https://t.co/JX8i8NpkpY?发财日记

导演: 宋小宝

编剧: 宋小宝

主演: 宋小宝 / 马丽 / 沙溢 / 张一山 / 肖央 / 更多…

类型: 喜剧

制片国家/地区: 中国大陆

语言: 汉语普通话

上映日期: 2021–02–12(中国大陆网络)

片长: 128分钟

又名: Dreams of Getting Rich

发财日记的剧情简介 · · · · · ·

故事讲述上世纪90年代初，穷小子小宝追随同村“发小儿”二哥，一路从贫穷朴实的东北农村来到了经济飞速发展的深圳。期间，两人无意中收留了一个嗷嗷待哺的婴儿，生活困窘的小宝和二哥该如何将孩子抚养长大？当小宝和二哥与同在深圳打拼的创业女青年马露“狭路相逢”，三人之间又将发生哪些令人捧腹的爆笑故事？一段笑泪参半、起伏跌宕的小人物奋斗史就此展开……

上世纪90年代初，穷小子小宝追随同村“发小儿”二哥，一路从贫穷朴实的东北农村来到了经济飞速发展的深圳。期间，两人无意中收留了一个嗷嗷待哺的婴儿，生活困窘的小宝和二哥该如何将孩子抚养长大？当小宝和二哥与同在深圳打拼的创业女青年马露“狭路相逢”，三人之间又将发生哪些令人捧腹的爆笑故事？一段笑泪参半、起伏跌宕的小人物奋斗史就此展开……

Dreams of Getting Rich 线上看

Dreams of Getting Rich几时上映

Dreams of Getting Rich演员

Dreams of Getting Rich中文

Dreams of Getting Rich上映时间

发财日记 线上看

发财日记 线 上 看

Dreams of Getting Rich 线上看

釜山行线上看

釜山行在线

Dreams of Getting Rich 中文线上看

釜山行完整版线上看

Dreams of Getting Rich 中文字幕

Dreams of Getting Rich 完整版

Dreams of Getting Rich 电影

Dreams of Getting Rich 中文

发财日记 什么时候上映

发财日记 在线

发财日记 线上看

发财日记 预告

发财日记 下载

发财日记 英文

发财日记 百度云

发财日记 演员

发财日记 剧情

发财日记 半岛线上看

发财日记 电影

发财日记 下载

发财日记 線上看

发财日记 线上看

发财日记 2021

[发财日记 ] 高清

发财日记 PTT

发财日记 下载mp4

发财日记 BD

发财日记 AMC

发财日记 在线

发财日记 豆瓣

发财日记 線上看小鸭

发财日记 粤语版

发财日记 yahoo

电影 发财日记 上映新年

发财日记 2021 票房

[发财日记 ] 电影2021下载

发财日记 电影2021 马来西亚

发财日记 电影2021新加坡

发财日记 下载看

发财日记 电影2021美国

发财日记 电影2021喜剧

[发财日记 ] 电影2021 威秀

发财日记 电影2021春节

发财日记

Dreams of Getting Rich: Dreams of Getting Rich online

发财日记 online

发财日记 Free

发财日记 电影2021华语

发财日记 电影

发财日记 在线

发财日记 下载

发财日记 传说

发财日记 豆瓣

发财日记 预告

发财日记 电影下载

发财日记 线上看

发财日记 剧情

发财日记 故事

发财日记 电影在线

发财日记 电影上映

发财日记 1080p

发财日记 完整版本

发财日记 完整版本2021

发财日记 完整版本HD

发财日记 完整版本自由

发财日记 完整版本線上

发财日记 完整版本下載

发财日记 完整版本IMDB

发财日记 完整版本MOVIE-DOUBAN

发财日记 完整版本流

发财日记 完整版本看

发财日记 完整版本720p

发财日记 完整版本1080p

发财日记 完整版本HINDI

发财日记 完整版本CHINESE

发财日记 完整版本US

发财日记 完整版本看電影

发财日记 完整版本在線觀看

发财日记 完整版本流 HD

发财日记 完整版本免費下載

发财日记 完整版本所有電影

发财日记 裸監督線上看小鴨影音 发财日记 裸監督線上看

发财日记 裸監督(新加坡版)線上看 (2021)

发财日记 裸監督1080P 下載

发财日记 裸監督免費線上看電影

Dreams of Getting Rich 2021 完整版 小鴨 — 線上看(2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich ▷線上看完整版(2021)在线观看 [1080P]

【 Dreams of Getting Rich 】-線上看小鴨 完整版

Dreams of Getting Rich -線上看(2021)完整版

Dreams of Getting Rich ~年夏天線上看| 最新電影| 小鴨影音|2021|

Dreams of Getting Rich 澳門上映

Dreams of Getting Rich (2021)上映

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上看

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上看小鴨

Dreams of Getting Rich 电影完整版

Dreams of Getting Rich (2021) 下載

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上看完整版小鴨

Dreams of Getting Rich (2021)完整版本

Dreams of Getting Rich 线上看(2021)完整版

《 Dreams of Getting Rich 》 線上看電影(2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich (電影)2021年再次觀看電影

Dreams of Getting Rich (2021)上看

Dreams of Getting Rich 免費線上看電影

Dreams of Getting Rich 主題曲

Dreams of Getting Rich 小鴨影音

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上小鴨

Dreams of Getting Rich 完整版本

Dreams of Getting Rich 香港上映

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上看小鴨影音

Dreams of Getting Rich 2021 線上看

《 Dreams of Getting Rich 》 2021在线

Dreams of Getting Rich 1080P 下載

Dreams of Getting Rich 免費線上看電影

Dreams of Getting Rich 电影在线2021年

Dreams of Getting Rich (2021)在线观看

Dreams of Getting Rich [2021]观看和下载

Dreams of Getting Rich singapora(2021) 完整版

Dreams of Getting Rich 網路大暴走小鴨(2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich 字幕(2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich 免費線上看電 (2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上看電 (2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich ~ 線上看(2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich 〜 完整版(2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich ~ 完整版 下載(2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich 免費在線觀看(2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上看線上(2021)完整版

Dreams of Getting Rich 港劇手機版-港劇網(2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich 電影 — 電視

Dreams of Getting Rich 電影首頁 — 電視首頁

Dreams of Getting Rich 本周新片 — Dreams of Getting Rich 目前放映

Dreams of Getting Rich 本期首輪 — 今日節目表

Dreams of Getting Rich 本期二輪 — 頻道節目表

Dreams of Getting Rich 近期上映 — 節目精選

Dreams of Getting Rich 新片快報 — 頻道列表

Dreams of Getting Rich 票房排行榜 — 有線電視

Dreams of Getting Rich 資料館 — 節目搜尋

Dreams of Getting Rich — 恐怖片- 高清免費線上看

Dreams of Getting Rich 在线 — 牠第二章小鴨

Dreams of Getting Rich 级别 — Dreams of Getting Rich 預告

Dreams of Getting Rich 线上看 — Dreams of Getting Rich 演員

Dreams of Getting Rich 线上看 — Dreams of Getting Rich 上映

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上看 — Dreams of Getting Rich 開眼

Dreams of Getting Rich 2021 — Dreams of Getting Rich 演員名單

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上看 — Dreams of Getting Rich 小鴨

Dreams of Getting Rich 预告 | Dreams of Getting Rich 上映時間

Dreams of Getting Rich 上映 ~ Dreams of Getting Rich 預告

Dreams of Getting Rich 剧情 ~ Dreams of Getting Rich 上映時間

Dreams of Getting Rich 线上

Dreams of Getting Rich 线上看

Dreams of Getting Rich 豆瓣

Dreams of Getting Rich 预告

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上看

Dreams of Getting Rich 劇情

Dreams of Getting Rich 下载

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上看

Dreams of Getting Rich 小鴨

Dreams of Getting Rich 香港

Dreams of Getting Rich

Dreams of Getting Rich 級別

Dreams of Getting Rich 劇情

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上

Dreams of Getting Rich 預告

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上看

Dreams of Getting Rich 香港

Dreams of Getting Rich 小鴨

Dreams of Getting Rich 上映

Dreams of Getting Rich 預告

Dreams of Getting Rich 阿嬤

Dreams of Getting Rich ptt

Dreams of Getting Rich 台灣

Dreams of Getting Rich 台灣上映

Dreams of Getting Rich 上映

Dreams of Getting Rich (豆瓣)(2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich (2021)線上看

Dreams of Getting Rich 高清电 (2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich [2021,HD]观看和下载

Dreams of Getting Rich (2021)完整版本

Dreams of Getting Rich 台灣上映 (2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich 免费的电 (2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich (2021)观看和下载

Dreams of Getting Rich 线上(2021)

Dreams of Getting Rich 線上看 — 小鴨 Dreams of Getting Rich 音

Dreams of Getting Rich hd線上看

Dreams of Getting Rich (新加坡版)線上看

Dreams of Getting Rich 香港版 2021

《 Dreams of Getting Rich 》 台灣線上看

Dreams of Getting Rich 台灣版

Dreams of Getting Rich 2021 線上看

Dreams of Getting Rich BD, 超清在线观看

Dreams of Getting Rich 在线观看2021

Dreams of Getting Rich HD/BD高清完整版在线观看 2021

Dreams of Getting Rich 电 Dreams of Getting Rich 完整版BD.2021

HD 电影- Dreams of Getting Rich 2021完整版本完整版中文字幕免费下载

Dreams of Getting Rich ~線上看(2021)完整版

Dreams of Getting Rich (2021,完整版)線上看

Dreams of Getting Rich 2021 完整版小鴨 — 線上看(2021)

【 Dreams of Getting Rich 】-線上看小鴨 完整版[2021-HD]〜[可玩]免費下載高清|1080P|-全高清高清电影-在线观看

Dreams of Getting Rich 完整版本-(2021-HD )-1080P

完整版 [2021,HD] Dreams of Getting Rich [电影]~ 2021】 完整版本 裸監督(CHINESE-新加坡版)線上看HD

Dreams of Getting Rich 【 2021】線上看小鴨影音[2021-HD] Dreams of Getting Rich 完整版本-高清电影-在线观看 CHINESE 【HD.1080P】

是一种艺术作品,其形式是一系列现场图像,这些图像被旋转以产生一种移动图像的错觉,这些图像被呈现为一种娱乐形式。一系列图像的错觉以视频的形式产生连续运动。这部电影通常被称为电影或移动图片。电影是一种现代流行的艺术形式,为商业和娱乐目的创建。电影制作现已成为全世界流行的行业,电影院一直期待故事片。电影主要以两种方式制作。首先是通过胶片相机拍摄和录制技术。此方法通过拍摄图像或对象完成。第二个使用传统的动画技术。此方法是通过计算机图形动画或 CGI 技术完成的。两者也可以与其他技术和视觉效果相结合。拍摄通常需要相对较长的时间。它还需要一个工作台,从导演,制片人,编辑,衣柜,视觉效果和其他开始

电影/电影的定义和定义

而在电影中扮演角色的玩家被称为演员(男性)或女演员(女性)。还有一个术语”额外”,用作电影中角色很少的配角。这与扮演更大、角色更多的主要角色不同。作为一个演员和演员必须要求有好的表演天赋,这是符合他主演的电影的主题。在某些场景中,演员的角色可以由特技演员或特技演员取代。特技演员的存在对于取代演员制作困难和极端的场景非常重要,这些场景通常存在于动作片中。电影也可以用来传达来自电影制作人的某些信息。一些行业还使用电影来传达和代表他们的符号和文化。电影制作也是一种表现形式,即一个人在电影中形象化的表达、思想、思想、概念、感受和情绪。这部电影本身主要是虚构的,虽然有些是基于事实真实的故事或基于一个真实的故事。

也有纪录片与原始和真实的图片,或传记电影,讲述一个字符的故事。还有许多其他流行的类型电影,从动作片,恐怖片,喜剧片,浪漫电影,幻想电影,惊悚电影,戏剧电影,科幻电影,犯罪电影,纪录片和其他。

这是关于电影或电影定义的一个小信息。从各种来源和参考资料中引用了这些信息。希望它能有用。

🔮故事🔮

科幻就像梦,除了这个分类中的故事利用逻辑安排来解释它需要的地方的宇宙。它大部分包含或侧重于 PC 或机器的假定影响或影响;穿越空间、时间或想象世界;局外人生物;遗传设计;或其他这样的事情。所利用的科学或创新可能或可能不会完全解释;其逻辑成分是明智的点,消息灵通,并被视为一般可以想象的当前信息和创新经常被称为硬科幻。写目标拥有,犯罪协会,给予某种程度的关联,和资产,帮助更大,更专业化的刑事交流比个人罪犯可以完成。罪犯将是一些电影的主题,特别是从1930年和1960年的某个地方。犯罪排序电影恢复自20世纪90年代与臀部跳跃文化爆炸。与越早的流氓电影不同,目前的电影与更成熟的电影分享比较成分,但更多的是在时髦的大都市环境中。一个经验故事是围绕一个英雄谁游览史诗或删除点执行的东西。它可以包含相当多的其他分类因素,因为它是一个开放的类型。英雄融入了使命,并面临着障碍,以到达他们的目标。此外,体验故事作为规则将模糊设置和具有有价值的属性或高光的字符合并。

最初,柴油朋克被假装游戏《日光之子》的制作者提出分类,他暗指由世纪中叶混搭故事推动的小说,其依据是第二次世界大战期间间节的风格(约1920–45年)。然而,像蒸汽朋克特别被观察为石油力量和技术官僚的洞察力的上升,与网络朋克更清楚地与网络朋克交流新诺尔因素和分享主题。尽管柴油朋克作为一种分类的惊人质量并非完全无可争议,但从复古先进的电影《天空船长》和《明日世界》到2001年Activision电脑游戏《回到沃尔芬斯坦城堡》等部分被推荐为典型的柴油朋克小说作品。一种风格,当一个艺人在现场人群面前表演,与他们直率交谈。这位艺人通常被暗示为喜剧演员、专业喜剧演员、专业喜剧演员或只是一个坚持者。在站立模仿中,这位艺人通常讨论有趣的故事、被称为”片段”的短笑话和笑话的无情进展,这些笑话包括通常所谓的话语、例行公事或行为。一些专业漫画使用道具,音乐或巫术特技,以改善他们的示范。站立讽刺经常在模仿俱乐部、酒吧、新杂耍、学校和剧院中表演。在实时执行之外,站立式通常通过电视、DVD 和网络进行货币传播。喜欢习惯活动;停止动作片不是利用手绘的,而是用小木偶或不同的文章制作的,这些物品的影像会定期在一组小发展上拍摄,以制作出动人轮廓。模特是圣诞节前的噩梦, 珊瑚, 和军团新娘。

🔮版权内容🔮

版权是一种知识产权,赋予其所有者制作创意作品的专属权利,通常为有限时间。[1][2][3][4][5] 创作作品可能以文学、艺术、教育或音乐形式出现。版权旨在保护一个想法的原始表达的形式,创造性的作品,但不是的想法,其恶魔杀手的电影:穆根火车。[6][7][8] 版权受基于公共利益考虑的限制,例如美国的公平使用原则。

有些司法管辖区要求以有形的形式”修复”受版权保护的作品。它通常由多个作者共享,每个作者都拥有一组使用或许可作品的权利,并且通常称为权利持有人。[需要引文][9][10][11][12] 这些权利通常包括复制、对衍生作品的控制、发行、公共表现以及归属等道德权利。[13]

版权可由公法授予,并被视为”领土权利”。这意味着,某一州法律授予的版权不超出该特定司法管辖区的领土范围。此类型的版权因国家/地区而异;许多国家,有时还有一大组国家,在”跨越”国界或国家权利不一致时,已与其他国家就适用的程序达成协议。[14]

通常,版权的公法期限在创作者死后 50 到 100 年到期,具体取决于司法管辖区。有些国家/地区要求某些版权手续[5]才能建立版权,另一些国家则承认任何已完成作品的版权,无需正式注册。

人们普遍认为,版权是促进文化多样性和创造力的必去之因。然而,Parc认为,与主流信仰相反,模仿和复制并不限制文化创意或多样性,但事实上却进一步支持它们。这一论点得到了许多例子的支持,如小米和梵高、毕加索、马奈和莫奈等[15]

🔮适应🔮

莎拉 · 保尔森是我的首选, 但这部电影不是她最好的。我相信几个月会出来, 我留下问我为什么这么有活力。拖车把所有东西都分了。在故事开始之前你就知道了几乎没有字符改进, 一切都感觉就像是 0–100, 没有起搏。同样, 莎拉最后一次看地狱之火的化妆品办公室, 当你想到这个时, 你会说你是乡亲们吗?当我看到她时,我真的窃笑。这是一部好电影。一个你会生气的机会, 你烧了现金。没什么新鲜事, 正常, 磨损的表演。此外,没有人意识到哮喘发作的正确行为。这部电影有这么多的情节开口,它看起来像一个模仿。母亲可以简单地把婴儿从诊所带走吗?她伤害了她的小女孩相当长的时间, 没有专家真正看到这个, 在她的定期访问?她是如何管理邮政承运人车辆的?没人介意邮政承运商缺席?出于什么原因, 这个女孩从来没有得到她周围无数尖锐或粗俗的文章之一, 并击中她的母亲?母亲把她所有重要的报告都放在一个容器里, 放在外面, 标记着?出于什么原因, 她会绑她女孩的车轮座位, 而不是她的女孩?这是整部电影的去向。这部电影的主要可救赎性是莎拉·保尔森非常可怕的表演。同样,这个故事也经常这样。我不会燃烧我的时间看这个。跑步并不奇怪,也非同寻常。表演是惊人的, 而故事是公平的。这个故事使一个宏伟的表现是令人兴奋的, 但它主要不会去任何地方。我知道所有计划发生, 尽管事实上我什么都不知道。尽管如此,有一个场景,我欣赏克莱尔说,”你需要我。表演只是那个场景的例外。一般来说,这是一个一次手表,你很可能不记得。这是另一部由Aneesh Chaganty(由Sev Ohanian共同创作)在Hulu上拍摄的电影,跟进他们现实的陈述搜索(2018年),与脊椎冷水机组包括一位母亲和她的17岁小女孩带来了一些混乱(心律失常,血热病,哮喘,糖尿病,和最有效的运动损失)。

我会说,可以想象这部电影是优于我更喜欢它,但在这种情况下,这将是它的协调和行动,而不是这样关于构图。我觉得到处都有空缺,也许过多的开口被扔给我们太早了,我们才能适当地思考人物和他们的环境。这种电影以前做过,没有很多新加的,在桌子上短轮椅透视。有一吨的组件设置什么可能给一个更接地的整理传送和冲孔,但这些节拍的较大部分是一音符和花费在电影之前,而不是关联一个坚实的内织,因为搜索可以选择做。我去了视障, 这是可能更好的, 我做到了, 因为预告片是相当揭示。我不认为它有一个足够高的屋顶, 在任何情况下, 以掩盖任何野生的欲望, 我之前有。我孤独的渴望是拥有制造商, 和这部电影可能会有观众最节省的恩典是, 我期望他们成为注意搜索, 看到它迟早…这是我期望你们中大部分人能减损这一点的事情。这是我在 2018 年#1一部第一部电影, 《奔跑》将跌到路边, 相当令人信服, 但完全被遗忘。故事和预组装的关系只是需要更多的挤压, 一旦学分滚动。这部电影是平均的, 最好的情况场景。尽量不要接受个人给它 8 或 9 。情节通常被看,过于不合理,关闭失败。他们试图展示它作为一个令人厌恶/脊柱冷水机组,但没有什么是令人兴奋的。这完全是戏剧化了。然而, 我要说, 艺人做了惊人的, 他们得到。莎拉 · 保尔森是她的标准 sdemon 杀手电影: 穆根火车, 伟大的, 不荣誉值得称赞。尽管这样,基拉·艾伦确实吸引了大家的注意。她制作了这部电影(延迟了2个小时)可观看。如果你欣赏该法案或没有什么可看的, 试试看。弄乱这粪便有什么意义?它类似于一个低租赁的努力, 在脊柱冷水机组, 但你肯定知道关闭。紧张中步履蹒跚的努力比什么都令人恼火。这是一部可怕的终身电影, 直截了当。还有,我喜欢一辈子的动画!此外, 它过于协调, 音乐精疲力竭, 表演并不难以置信。

Its somewhat ironic that a movie about time travel can’t be reviewed properly until your future self rewatches the movie.

It’s bold of Nolan to make such a thoroughly dense blockbuster. He assumes people will actually want to see Black Box more than once so they can understand it properly, which some may not. This movie makes the chronology of Inception look as simplistic as tic-tac-toe.

Ergo, it’s hard for me to give an accurate rating, without having seen it twice, as I’m still trying to figure out whether everything does indeed make sense. If it does, this movie is easily a 9 or 10. If it doesn’t, it’s a 6.

It’s further not helped by the fact that the dialogue in the first 15 minutes of the movie is painfully hard to understand / hear. Either they were behind masks; they were practically mumbling; the sound effects were too loud; or all of the above. The exposition scenes are also waayyy too brief for something this complex — a problem also shared with Black Box actually.

(Black Box had this minimalist exposition problem explaining Blight, where if you weren’t careful, you’d miss this one sentence / scene in the entire movie explaining that Blight was a viral bacteria:

“Earth’s atmosphere is 80% nitrogen, we don’t even breathe nitrogen. Blight does, and as it thrives, our air gets less and less oxygen”).

I guess it’s a Nolan quirk. Hopefully, a revision of the film audio sorts the sound mixing out. I do like the soundtrack, but it’s too loud initially.

I liked all the actors. You think John Washington can’t act at first, but he can, and he grows on you as the film progresses. And Pattinson is his usual charming self. Elizabeth is a surprise treat. And so on.

Its worth a watch either way. See it with subtitles if you can. And definitely don’t expect to fully understand whats going on the first time around.

Its one hell of a complicated film. It will be very hard for an average viewer to gather all the information provided by this movie at the first watch. But the more you watch it, more hidden elements will come to light. And when you are able to put these hidden elements together. You will realize that this movie is just a “masterpiece” which takes the legacy of Christopher Nolan Forward

If I talk about acting, Then I have to say that Robert Pattinson has really proved himself as a very good actor in these recent years. And I am sure his acting skills will increase with time. His performance is charming and very smooth. Whenever he is on the camera, he steals the focus John David Washington is also fantastic in this movie. His performance is electrifying, I hope to see more from him in the future. Other characters such as Kenneth Branagh, Elizabeth, Himesh Patel, Dimple Kapadia, Clémence Poésy have also done quite well. And I dont think there is a need to talk about Michael Caine

Talking about Music, its awesome. I dont think you will miss Hans Zimmer’s score. Ludwig has done a sufficient job. There is no lack of good score in the movie

Gotta love the editing and post production which has been put into this movie. I think its fair to say this Nolan film has focused more in its post production. The main problem in the movie is the sound mixing. Plot is already complex and some dialogues are very soft due to the high music score. It makes it harder to realize what is going on in the movie. Other Nolan movies had loud BGM too. But Audio and dialogues weren’t a problem

My humble request to everyone is to please let the movie sink in your thoughts. Let your mind grasp all the elements of this movie. I am sure more people will find it better. Even those who think they got the plot. I can bet they are wrong.

Black Box is the long awaited new movie from Christopher Nolan. The movie that’s set to reboot the multiplexes post-Covid. It’s a manic, extremely loud, extremely baffling sci-fi cum spy rollercoaster that will please a lot of Nolan fan-boys but which left me with very mixed views.

John David Washington (Denzel’s lad) plays “The Protagonist” — a crack-CIA field operative who is an unstoppable one-man army in the style of Hobbs or Shaw. Recruited into an even more shadowy organisation, he’s on the trail of an international arms dealer, Andrei Sator (Kenneth Branagh in full villain mode). Sator is bullying his estranged wife Kat (Elizabeth Debicki) over custody of their son (and the film unusually has a BBFC warning about “Domestic Abuse”). Our hero jets the world to try to prevent a very particular kind of Armageddon while also keeping the vulnerable and attractive Kat alive.

This is cinema at its biggest and boldest. Nolan has taken a cinema ‘splurge’ gun, filled it with money, set it on rapid fire, removed the safety and let rip at the screen. Given that Nolan is famous for doing all of his ‘effects’ for real and ‘in camera’, some of what you see performed is almost unbelievable. You thought crashing a train through rush-hour traffic in “Inception” was crazy? You ain’t seen nothing yet with the airport scene! And for lovers of Chinooks (I must admit I am one and rush out of the house to see one if I hear it coming!) there is positively Chinook-p*rn on offer in the film’s ridiculously huge finale.

The ‘inversion’ aspects of the story also lends itself to some fight scenes — one in particular in an airport ‘freeport’ — which are both bizarre to watch and, I imagine, technically extremely challenging to pull off. In this regard John David Washington is an acrobatic and talented stunt performer in his own right, and must have trained for months for this role.

Nolan’s crew also certainly racked up their air miles pre-lockdown, since the locations range far and wide across the world. The locations encompassed Denmark, Estonia, India, Italy, Norway, the United Kingdom, and United States. Hoyte Van Hoytema’s cinematography is lush in introducing these, especially the beautiful Italian coast scenes. Although I did miss the David Arnold strings that would typically introduce these in a Bond movie: it felt like that was missing.

The ‘timey-wimey’ aspects of the plot are also intriguing and very cleverly done. There are numerous points at which you think “Oh, that’s a sloppy continuity error” or “Shame the production design team missed that cracked wing mirror”. Then later in the movie, you get at least a dozen “Aha!” moments. Some of them (no spoilers) are jaw-droppingly spectacular.

Perhaps the best twist is hidden in the final line of the movie. I only processed it on the way home.

And so to the first of my significant gripes with Black Box. The sound mix in the movie is all over the place. I’d go stronger than that… it’s truly awful (expletive deleted)! Nolan often implements Shakespeare’s trick of having characters in the play provide exposition of the plot to aid comprehension. But unfortunately, all of this exposition dialogue was largely incomprehensible. This was due to:

the ear-splitting volume of the sound: “”&G2&”” movie audiences are going to be suffering from ‘Black Boxis’! (LOL);

the dialogue is poorly mixed with the thumping music by Ludwig Göransson (Wot? No Hans Zimmer?);

a large proportion of the dialogue was through masks of varying description (#covid-appropriate). Aaron Taylor-Johnson was particularly unintelligible to my ears.

Overall, watching this with subtitles at a special showing might be advisable!

OK, so I only have a PhD in Physics… but at times I was completely lost as to the intricacies of the plot. It made “Inception” look like “The Tiger Who Came to Tea”. There was an obvious ‘McGuffin’ in “Inception” — — (“These ‘dream levels’… how exactly are they architected??”…. “Don’t worry… they’ll never notice”. And we didn’t!) In “Black Box” there are McGuffins nested in McGuffins. So much of this is casually waved away as “future stuff… you’re not qualified” that it feels vaguely condescending to the audience. At one point Sator says to Kat “You don’t know what’s going on, do you?” and she shakes her head blankly. We’re right with you there luv!

There are also gaps in the storyline that jar. The word “Black Box”? What does it mean. Is it just a password? I’m none the wiser.

The manic pace of Black Box and the constant din means that the movie gallops along like a series of disconnected (albeit brilliant) action set pieces. For me, it has none of the emotional heart of the Cobb’s marriage problems from “Inception” or the father/daughter separation of “Black Box”. In fact, you barely care for anyone in the movie, perhaps with the exception of Kat.

It’s a talented cast. As mentioned above, John David Washington is muscular and athletic in the role. It’s a big load for the actor to carry in such a tent-pole movie, given his only significant starring role before was in the excellent BlacKkKlansman. But he carries it off well. A worthy successor to Gerard Butler and Jason Statham for action roles in the next 10 years.

This is also a great performance by Robert Pattinson, in his most high-profile film in a long time, playing the vaguely alcoholic and Carré-esque support guy. Pattinson’s Potter co-star Clemence Poésy also pops up — rather more un-glam that usual — as the scientist plot-expositor early in the movie.

Nolan’s regular Michael Caine also pops up. although the 87-year old legend is starting to show his age: His speech was obviously affected at the time of filming (though nice try Mr Nolan in trying to disguise that with a mouth full of food!). But in my book, any amount of Caine in a movie is a plus. He also gets to deliver the best killer line in the film about snobbery!

However, it’s Kenneth Branagh and Elizabeth Debicki that really stand out. They were both fabulous, especially when they were bouncing off each other in their marital battle royale.

So, given this was my most anticipated movie of the year, it’s a bit of a curate’s egg for me. A mixture of being awe-struck at times and slightly disappointed at others. It’s a movie which needs a second watch, so I’m heading back today to give my ear drums another bashing! And this is one where I reserve the right to revisit my rating after that second watch… it’s not likely to go down… but it might go up.

(For the full graphical review, check out One Mann’s Movies on t’interweb and Facebook. Thanks.)

As this will be non-spoiler, I can’t say too much about the story. However, what I can is this: Black Box’s story is quite dynamic in the sense that you won’t understand it till it wants you to. So, for the first half, your brain is fighting for hints and pieces to puzzle together the story. It isn’t until halfway through the movie that Black Box invites you to the fantastic storytelling by Christopher Nolan.

Acting is beyond phenomenal, and I’d be genuinely surprised if neither Robert Pattinson nor John David Washington doesn’t receive an Oscar nomination for best actor. It’s also hard not to mention how good Elizabeth Debicki and Aaron Johnson both are. All around, great acting, and the dialogue amps up the quality of the movie.

The idea of this movie is damn fascinating, and while there are films that explore time-travelling, there’s never been anything quite like this. It has such a beautiful charm and for the most part, explains everything thoroughly. It feels so much more complex than any form of time-travelling we’ve seen, and no less could’ve been expected from Nolan.

Oh my lord, the score for this film fits so perfectly. Every scene that’s meant to feel intense was amped by a hundred because of how good the score was. Let me just say though, none of them will be found iconic, but they fit the story and scenes so well.

In the end, I walked out, feeling very satisfied. Nevertheless, I do have issues with the film that I cannot really express without spoiling bits of the story. There are definitely little inconsistencies that I found myself uncovering as the story progressed. However, I only had one issue that I found impacted my enjoyment. That issue was understanding some of the dialogue. No, not in the sense that the movie is too complicated, but more that it was hard to make out was being said at times. It felt like the movie required subtitles, but that probably was because, at a time in the film, there was far too much exposition.

Nevertheless, I loved this film, I’ll be watching it at least two more times, and I think most of you in this group will enjoy it. I definitely suggest watching it in theatres if possible, just so you can get that excitement.

(4/5) & (8.5/10) for those that care about number scores.

At first, I want to ask Christopher Nolan one question, HOW THE HELL YOU DID THIS? Seriously I want to have an answer, How did he write such as this masterpiece! How did he get this complicated, fabulous and creative idea? What is going on in his mind? The story is written and directed perfectly, the narration style was absolutely unique. I have no idea how can anyone direct such as this story, that was a huge challenge, and as usual Nolan gave us a masterpiece that we’ll put beside (Memento), (Inception) and (Black Box) The movie is so fast-paced in a good way, there was no boring moment. The chemistry between John David Washington and Robert Pattinson was great and funny and both of their performance was really good. Elizabeth Debicki performance was the best in the movie because she had the chance to show her acting abilities and she cached up that chance and showed us an A level acting.

The music wasn’t unique and distinct as the music of Black Box for example and I think this movie needed the touch of Hans Zimmer, I’m not saying that Ludwig Göransson failed but Hans Zimmer in another level.

If there was something I’d say that I didn’t like it in the movie would it be that Nolan discarded any set up or characters backgrounds except Elizabeth Debicki dramatic story but it wasn’t that bad for me, I didn’t care about that, the exciting story didn’t give me the chance to focus on it. But the actual problem was the third act, it was really complicated and I got lost and I convinced myself to discard the questions that were in my head and enjoy the well-made action sequences and Elizabeth Debicki performance.

I think this kind of movie that gets better with a second and third watch.

I honestly don’t quite know where to begin with Black Box. I love Christopher Nolan’s work but I have never seen a more complicated film (and I understood Memento). After nearly three hours, I came away from Black Box not knowing myself, my mind reduced to nothing more than piles of ash.

Was there time travel involved? Hmm, there was definitely something about time inversion. I mean, does Nolan even understand what he wrote? Look, I give credit to the director because he’s one of the few directors left who knows how to create a compelling and intelligent blockbuster. Black Box is full of Nolan trademarks — the gratuitous Michael Caine cameo, a loud, really loud score, complete with stunning cinematography and slickly inventive action set-pieces.

This time around however, Nolan has finally managed to ‘out-Nolan’ himself: the palindromic plot, whilst creatively ambitious, is simply far too complicated for its own good. Black Box is overlong, overstuffed, pretentious and too exhausting to comprehend in its entirety — it makes Inception and Black Box look like Peppa Pig by comparison.

I’m aware of the technical wizardry and creative mastery in this film and lord knows I’ll have to watch this again. For those who want a puzzle, Black Box at least provides a unique cinematic experience. But to actually enjoy solving it Nolan wants you to work very very hard.