Militia Stand Down-The First Objective Reading of the 2nd amendment
By: Geoff Smith
Tags: James Madison, Gun Control, Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin, 2nd Amendment

Preface

On Dec 2 2015 I discovered a way to actually read the 2nd amendment from left to right like any other sentence to such an extent that it required no history to understand its language. You will have never heard it presented in this manner before because if you had, we all would have heard about it. The difficulty in making such a claim as this is one would instantly want to group me into the noise of 2nd amendment interpreters. Judge it for yourself. In the manner presented it can easily be seen that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” simply never existed. To paraphrase what it actually says is the following. Some of the people get some of the Arms providing they don’t violate the societal conditions of peace as mandated by clause two, which must be arrived at by clause one. This is a gun control amendment. It is a check and balance against power only in this case the power to be checked are the Arms. In being unable to debate a dictionary and to the profound societal implications this would have for the USA if it was true I decided to start the research. Now the sentence required no history to understand its language however it conflicted with currently known narratives of history. If true, there must have been something strange going on in history otherwise we would have been told about it by day one. So the research began….

Purpose of this Article

I am seeking a champion to help escalate this. This will require some thought and there will be many biases that will get in the way of your reading this to the end. First and foremost, I don’t pretend to be an author because this takes practice and my time was limited in this. It is the substance that is of most importance because the research that I’m going to be presenting to you, this being a very limited preview of it does not belong to me. It belongs to 320 million people. This is purely academic. Now I have been studying the statistics of the effectiveness of this article and so far over 1000 people have viewed and about 250 have read it from start to finish. It appears that everyone is waiting for the other person to champion this. I’m trying to reach the right circles because it appears that I don’t have the “credentials” to finish the research that I now put before you. A discovery does not care about a mans credentials and intelligence is a thing. It cannot be taught in any University and we all have a splash of our own. In turn, knowledge is derived from intelligence but its bias that is usually the master of our own intelligence. A bias for consensus is not a proof of a thing, but only a consensus based on the current knowledge of it. This is NEW knowledge. It has never existed before and was derived based on first a discovery and then the research which further revealed some new narratives. I’m not a man that is easily astonished by my own imagination save perhaps when I look in the mirror and see something other than what I thought I was. What the most cherished framers of the United States Constitution were up to in the background is quite frankly astonishing. Yes it was a conspiracy of sorts but a conspiracy is a thing of secrets and their particular secret was always meant to be revealed. In a very surreal way, this one man , is their voice at the moment. They actually anticipated that one day someone would crack THEIR code of the 2nd amendment and then seek out an explanation as to why such a thing was hidden in the first place. This is part of their story. I am nothing more than a narrator. It appears that their enemy is incredulity. This is more than just a man trying to sell a book. This is the final chapter in a story that was started over two hundred years before I was even born. How does a man tell a professor that they got part of history wrong? I have emailed over 40 now and in denying me my own intelligence they have unknowingly denied the faith of the framers in their future countrymen’s to stand up and take notice and escalate what is essentially the final legacy of their constitution. Intelligence is a thing. To not take notice and judge something with only the ignorance of it as a guide is to deny intelligence itself. I deferred to the intelligence of the framers, a bias I chose and it is only because of that , that I made the discovery in the first place. My own humanity took over from there because I recognized that what I had discovered was far bigger than I, but I fear that I may be perceived to be “too small in the sharing of it”. Now to call that a shame would be a profound understatement. Light this up and the fallout will be Liberty. The alternative is to continue to witness gun violence in the USA, the faction of the gun debate and a daily lottery where death is the reward.

After 16 months of research this is the new narrative that was discovered derived from some source documents. As to why these were never discovered before will be explained and demonstrated.

This first section explains the lead up as to how I was able to actually read the 2nd Amendment. If you wish to see what it actually says you can scroll down to the graphic. After that section the veracity of what you have just been shown will be proven with some rather clever historical documentation along with some very important physical objects which were constructed by Benjamin Franklin. This is purely academic.

Observations on the 2nd Amendment

Keep in mind that this was just a simple hypothesis and a perhaps a completely different approach to studying the text of the 2nd amendment. I had no idea what it might say and most certainly was not planning to do any research with respect to it until I actually discovered a way to read this one sentence.

I decided to take 3 steps back and use reality as my guide a reality being that James Madison was both intelligent and educated. It has been observed that the 2nd amendment is awkwardly constructed and for the most part it has been read from right to left. Why would James Madison fashion a sentence like this? I surmised that he would not have in such an important document as the Bill of Rights. I was deferring to the actual text of the 2nd amendment and not the known history that has been used to qualify the validity of only it’s third clause. A clause which unfortunately is now well-settled as being dogma and is often used to define it.

The bias of all previous interpretations have always been to the third clause “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” which appears to be further supported by the last one “shall not be infringed”.

After much reflection it appeared to me that there was much psychology at play as well with the very approach to interpreting this sentence.

Why would any American suspect that their was some sort of conspiracy going on from day one by some of their most admired founding fathers? Most of us have experienced this in life already with another type of Clause, a fat one. We all suffered a bit of indignation when we discovered our own parents had been deceiving us for years with mirth in their eyes and had been eating the very cookies and drinking the very milk which we knew in our hearts was nothing more than a bribe for a better laden tree in the following year. In a sense as a Canadian I was somewhat immune to this subconscious resistance because the framers of America were not my parents, though they were too my ancestors. The Supreme Court has demonstrated their bias to the 3rd clause as well because they label the front of the 2nd amendment “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State” as being a prefatory clause. They refer to the last half as being the operative or the meat and potatoes of the thing which is of course “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. When first observing the 2nd amendment it also appears to provide both a gift of power , being Arms in conjunction with “the right” as signifying its true meaning. Once a man is given a gift that he likes it can be a very difficult thing to return especially if it calms his fear and gives him some sense of control.

I began to read the 2nd amendment as a set of instructions. It quickly began to fall apart upon closer inspection especially when I used any current supporting arguments. As stated it appeared to have been discerned or read from right to left. There was a problem with using that third clause. If the 3rd clause was true then how could “regulated” live in the same sentence? The word “regulated” would have to be explained in such a manner that it had nothing to do with “regulations”. This was accomplished by connecting it to the word prior to it which is of course “well”.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”.

It was further stated that the front of the sentence could not be connected to the back, hence the perception of a “prefatory clause”. This was going to be my angle of “attack” if this was in fact a riddle of sorts. I was going to see if I could make the sentence work like a sentence but also see if I could somehow connect the front to the back. I believe my twenty years experience in software development has given me an advantage in cracking the code of this sentence in that I am very familiar with equations. I found a way to connect the front of this sentence to the back because suddenly I saw an equation with four steps and variables. The prefatory and operative clauses completely vanished. It was the word “Militia”. The two constituent parts in the word Militia are people and Arms. These became generic variables which care nothing for the 18th century flintlocks that they have been previously attributed to referencing. They became timeless requiring population while keeping pace with technological advancement.

I was beginning to actually read the 2nd amendment, not interpret it , but actually read it. I had no idea what it might say because at this point the “operative clause” still existed. I then started again from the front and as I read through it the operative clause completely vanished. This appeared to be the first time in perhaps 180 years the 2nd amendment screamed out its true purpose and function. It was a very clever and well thought out equation and it was timeless. It required no history to explain it. It had zero to do with 18th century Militia’s but rather only the utility of the word “militia”. I recognized that the 2nd amendment had never been read like this before because we most certainly would have heard about it. If the rubber does not hit the road with the very English of the Constitution then of what value is it? It is the Supreme Court’s job to discern the constitution and sometimes they require history to do that if the text of it is confusing. The bias of political ideology may also be something working in the background as well. Justices are generally appointed from this place of advantage. I hope I have demonstrated that my motive in this was influenced by none of these factors. I used the rawest of reality for my guide and I found a way for the 2nd amendment to actually tell me what it was. No interpretation necessary if you know how to actually read it. SCOTUS violated the constitution in their interpretation.

“being necessary to the security of a free State”. Noah Webster is the founder of this dictionary and in the 1780’s was in the process of creating a dictionary for Students. He was also a founding father and I have located letters between him , Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton who I believe was his classmate.

The current understanding of history comes from books and currently all 18th literature that pertains to the 2nd amendment has come from the “pro-gun” side of what we now witness today as the gun debate. The literature comes from research which if it has any veracity is done through looking at history through source documents be them newspapers or the writings of the framers.

I have spent over 16 months researching the history of the 2nd amendment but not to explain what it means because as you can see the text tells us that. The history explains why it was hidden or not explained from day one. As it is now read as a right of We the People to reality based Arms control then there must have been some unknown narrative in history. There most certainly was an unknown narrative which I will begin to show you with some source historical documents which I have linked to source. They are all freely available at legitimate government websites as digitized media.

In order to research something a man only needs a splash of intelligence and access to historical documents which are readily available with today’s digitized historical source media. If I was in possession of any credentials at all that pertained to historical research or constitutional law I would still not have been taught this new knowledge because this is brand new.

A New Narrative : There was a “Gun Debate” in the 18th Century.

If in fact the text says what it actually says then there must have been some sort of conspiracy going on. Why would the framers not have explained the 2nd amendment from day one?

It has taken almost 224 years since the Bill of Rights was ratified for it to be finally read. After reading what I did I was both astonished and horrified. I began to see if I could resolve who else knew about this because I could not debate the English of it. Others had to have known what appeared to be a secret. What I’m going to present to you next is a small part of the research but it is my hope you will recognize what I saw. This is new and there is a reason for it but for it to actually make sense you will first have to understand some previously unknown narratives that were previously hidden.

The Beginning of my Research.

From preface of “Militia Stand Down- The First Objective Reading of the 2nd Amendment”

>

This is the excerpt from that letter that James Madison wrote Sept 15, 1821 which is almost exactly three decades from the ratification date of the Bill of Rights.

“In general it had appeared to me that it might be best to let the work be a posthumous one; or at least that its publication should be delayed till the Constitution should be well settled by practice, & till a knowledge of the controversial part of the proceedings of its framers could be turned to no improper account.”

A few sentences later James Madison goes on to say this.

“the legitimate meaning of the Instrument must be derived from the text itself; or if a key is to be sought elsewhere, it must be not in the opinions or intentions of the Body which planned & proposed the Constitution”

Why is James Madison being so aloof in this letter? He is obviously hiding something but what is he hiding and why? Feel free to be suspicious because he wants you to be. As the purported author of the 2nd amendment, let us assume that this man is privy to the events surrounding its construction. James Madison has used the word “legitimate” which infers that something is being incorrectly interpreted. James Madison talks of a “posthumous work” and its publication.

Now you can take an educated guess as to what the instrument is that James Madison alludes to. The reason that he is not telling us is that even 30 years after the Constitutional Convention of 1788 it would be premature. In my research I have found a “similar” letter written by John Adams where he quantifies the minimum time as being at least 100 years. This had to be hidden not only from the 18th century but from scholars in the 19th as well. It has been impossible to resolve the context of the “Instrument” in the absence of what I have just shown you. If it had been resolved back to the second amendment in the absence of actually knowing how to “read” it surely would have been resolved academia before now.

In June of 2016 I then encountered this next letter which was written by Thomas Jefferson. It was about the 145th one I had located and “deciphered”. To date I have located over 250 of these very specially crafted letters. He wrote it “to” William Johnson on June 12, 1823. I have little doubt that this is document was written under the guise of being a letter. It was only mailed in the sense that it had been archived, but archived for eyes that had yet to born. This is how I see it anyway but perhaps I’m biased in this matter.

The Context

The primary men in this “cabinet” were Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay who are the authors of the letters. It is their letters and those of a few others that are the foundation of this book and those men that were on the side of the hidden gun control debate. Each letter is transcribed and deciphered in a similar manner that I have been demonstrating to you now. If you are a scholar who has studied these letters before you will notice that this is the first time you have ever seen them presented in this manner. I say this not out of some arrogant confidence but with only a respect to intelligence because there was no logical reason to do this before. Where James Madison had referred to his posthumous work being published, Thomas Jefferson refers to that work as being a treasure, consisting of the letters which he hopes will one day be in the public view. He is talking about letters that were hidden and were meant for some future time.

The “public view” as per Thomas Jefferson and the “publication” as per James Madison has now been titled “Militia Stand Down- The First Objective Reading of the 2nd Amendment”. Thomas Jefferson and the men in that cabinet I have been working for for over 16 months have my back on this research for they name me the “Candid a friend to Truth”. So for those that may think my historical research may have been none of my business, it appears that Thomas Jefferson begs to differ. In January of 2016 it got surreal pretty fast because after locating the very first Benjamin Franklin Cipher that he wrote in his 83 year of life 6 months before his death it struck me like a slap in the face. I suddenly realized that I was part of the very narrative of history that I was discovering.

That letter was a full on cipher completely invisible and in fact looked a bit like a shopping list. Nothing really stood out , though it seemed a bit over the top. It was when I discovered that the man who wrote the letter to him had been in the grave at least 6 years that the letter must have been completely contrived. It pointed at least 13 ways to not only the 2nd amendment but also to the Bill of Rights, but nothing explicit. This letter was crafted and then archived , and would only be visible once the 2nd amendment was known for what it really was. It was meant, for eyes that were not yet born, eyes that are currently checking this document for typoh’s. Surreal.

“TO WILLIAM ALEXANDER (L. c.) October 26 1789. 46 THE WRITINGS OF BENJAMIN FRANKLIN [1789 Philadelphia, MY DEAR FRIEND, You may remember, that two or three Years ago, I com- municated to you a Claim I had upon the State of Virginia, on Account of a Purchase it had made of some Types & other printing Materials belonging to me at the Beginning of the Troubles ; The Value could not at that Time be ascertained. Mr. Bache, my Attorney, being unacquainted with it ; & my Papers and Accounts being lost & destroyed during the late Confusions. I have now no Means of discovering what the Quantity was of the Types & what they cost me ; I only remember that there was a Fount of Law-Character for which I paid 30^ Sterl? & a large Fount of Greek which I think was valued at about 40^ Sterl. besides a very con- siderable Fount of Long-Primer, the Weight of which I forget, but suppose it might be about 5oo lb which at 1/6 per Ib amounted to 37^ io/ Sterl 8 . There were also some Cases & other Things of which I cannot speak particularly. You were so kind as to offer me your Assistance in procuring from the Government some Satisfaction for this Claim, I now take the Liberty to request that you would endeavour it as soon as possible, as I wish to have all my Affairs settled before my Departure: The Law-Fount & the Greek were probably of no Use to the Government, & I should be willing to take them back if they still exist, and are entire. I suppose that the Value of Goods at that Time will be considered, as well as the Length of Time during which the Payment has been delayed. I submit the Whole to the Honour & Equity of the Government, & shall be thankful for what they will be pleased to allow me. My best Wishes attend you, being ever My Dear Friend,

Your’s most affectionately B FRANKLIN.”

www.franklinpapers.org.

Did anything jump out at you in this letter? Some of the ciphers I have had to revisit in finding their ultimate solution. The reason why I recognized this as a cipher was because of its tone and its detail. The “small law” font and the “large greek font” leaped off the page. There is another word for “militia” which just happens to be Phalanx, and a Phalanx is a Greek militia. “well-regulated” or “well ordered” vanished adding to the veracity of “reading” the 2nd amendment the way I have demonstrated. The law font is the “r” in regulated and the large Greek font is the “M” in Militia. Keep in mind if we now know that the 2A was secreted away fashion then we know that some of the Framers were hiding things by design. Names also have meanings and “William” means “protector” as in the 2nd amendments secret had to be protected but once exposed as a gun control amendment its context would complete change to an “Alexander” aka “savior of the people”. There is much more to this cipher but this man was 83 years of age when he wrote this. After reading this , as a 53 year old man, I now fear geriatrics. If they look at me with unblinking eyes I start to fidget and thank the lord for the mobility of my “youth”.

After my initial discovery I had tried to notify over 30 people and organizations in December of 2015. I believe incredulity was my biggest obstacle so I began to research to history and then due the sheer volume of information I was locating the only medium to reveal this previously hidden write was with the veracity of the interpretations through a book. I haven’t included the solution to the cipher above because I have this habit I just can’t seem to shake, and the framers don’t pay a living wage for 16 months of labor, so consider this a “teaser”. Beyond the scope of its profound importance the book itself can also be viewed as a puzzle book which will bring you into an intimate relationship with intelligence and cleverness of America’s wisest framers. You will witness the true nature of intelligence and the very proof of its existence providing you don’t let your own ego or incredulity get in the way. I will admit it has been quite an adventure in doing this research but also an act of desperation on my part on behalf of these men, who in a very surreal way I have been working for.

I was compelled to write this book. This was an issue of lost and found and what I found was not mine to keep. It was far bigger than I and even you yourself in finding this information simply “neat”. This is the final legacy of the United States Constitution and what will be probably considered the longest running Sociological Experiment in human history. There is a right that is currently being infringed in the USA and as long as this continues liberty will bleed.

Still don’t believe me? I agree it’s not easy to discover a 200 year old dogma is really a fallacy. In September of 2016 I got to wondering if the United States Seals were also used since they were after all symbolic. The problem I had though was to tie one of these men to it. Benjamin Franklin was on the first committee , but his doodles were not up to snuff so three more came after him. He was out of the loop. So I started to dig around a bit. In the third and fourth committee a consultant was brought on board. Now this man was used because he was an expert in coats of Arms and heraldry. I had also discovered earlier that Benjamin Franklin was the founder and president of the American Philosophical Society. This man had become a member to this invite only society. A think tank of sorts for the scientists and philosophers of the day. Patrick Henry was not a member. So now I had what might be a proxy. In knowing what these men were up too, and how they were going about it I paid another visit to Franklinpapers.org. It has about 30,000 of Benjamin Franklin’s letters but can be searched on year or person. I could find no letters to this expert that appeared to be of any value, but in his short biography, I saw that his uncle was David Rittenhouse. This seemed like a pretty good linkage so I then focused on correspondence between him and Benjamin Franklin. Remember, I’m trying to link Benjamin Franklin to the Seals. I discovered that David Rittenhouse was an astronomer. He was also the next president of the society after Benjamin Franklin’s passing. It pulled up a letter written in 1780. As I started to read it, the “indicators” started to appear. The word “cataract” was used. It was an odd little story, but a bit to involved and cryptic to just be a just a your typical letter

The David Rittenhouse Cipher

http://franklinpapers.org/franklin//

“From David Rittenhouse April 29th 1780

als: American Philosophical Society

Philadelphia April 29th. 1780

Sir

Amidst the many important objects of your attention I doubt not but you sometimes unbend your mind by an Excursion thro’ the fields of Philosophy, I shall therefore make no apology for communicating to you a freak of Nature which seems to be new, at least it is so to us. On the 19th. of August last during a heavy Shower of Rain, not attended by any Thunder lightning or wind, a prodigious Torrent fell on the North or Blue Mountain 10 Miles from Carlisle, and Carried away every Rock and Tree however large that stood in its Course, it likewise tore up the Earth & Stones from 4 to 10 feet deep, and from two to 6 perchers wide, for upwards of 100 rod, that is from very near the top of the Mountain down to the foot of the first Steep Ascent. I had heard such wonderful accounts of the effects of this Cataract that I was induced to take a ride of 130 miles to view the Spot, and spent a whole Day there with satisfaction and astonishment. The facts I am perfectly convinced of by my own observation, and which appear to me most worthy of your notice are these. It was certainly a stream of water falling from the Clouds in a Spot not above 10 yards diameter, and not any Collection of waters falling in rain, on the surface of the Earth. The face of the mountain will not admit a possibility of suppoing it to have been a collection of water already fallen in rain the common way, it being a very high narrow ridge, and the Soil, Stony, Sandy and sufficently porous to drink up rains falling in the common way. And tho’ the Stream seems to have continued some time, certainly at least a few minutes, it nevertheless fell invariably in the same Spot, without moving to the right or left. I should be happy in having your opinion on this matter, my own Conjecture is that a Great Quantity of the Electric fluid, passing silently from the Cloud to the Mountain, carried the forming drops of rain from all quarters of the Cloud to one point, and by uniting them producd this prodigious Cataract —

I am, Dr. Sir, with the utmost respect and esteem, your sincere friend and most obedient humble Servant

Davd. Rittenhouse”

I have deciphered much more of this letter than I’m going to describe here but use it to show you what “they” look like. In it you can find a starting point being Carlisle, which is a place that can be found in Pennsylvania. The 10 mile reference I was able to resolve as being a crossing point on the shallows of a river, which gave me a rough bearing of direction, refining the radius of 130 miles to the spot with a bearing of sorts. I found the spot which resides about 110 miles as the crow flies. Now in the late 18th century, a genius would know not to ride a crow , especially a plump one. No , a genius would have had the horse sense to use another mane form of transportation, in the 18th century, and the roads would have meandered, and where no bridges existed, the shallows of rivers would have been the choice of the day, especially in a spot where the Blue Ridge Mountain bisected a wide river. (sorry). Now after using google maps , for about 10 minutes, and driving around the country side, on a hunch, while sipping fresh coffee, I did a search on “PA” and “pyramid” and then I hit pay dirt. I found a video that some chap was nice enough to have produced. Being 2000 miles away myself, it would have been beyond my current resource to roam the countryside. The gentleman didn’t have a clue as to what this place really was. It resides though about 26 miles from Philadelphia. On the outside of the main structure is an engraving and on it is Benjamin Franklin’s name , because this is a place where Freemason’s gathered. There is a pyramid, which can be entered and then abruptly stops at a metal wall. In that wall there are two barred windows, and beyond them a time capsule of sorts. Its a puzzle chamber. I have solved it, but I had an advantage that I was able to reverse engineer it and it fits like a glove. I did not contrive this place, and it is no theory of mine that it exists. The chronology of history tells us the seals were finalized in 1782. The Constitutional Convention started in 1787. Immediately after that, it is common knowledge that the 2nd amendment first saw the light of day, first being the 4th article and then finally ratified on Dec 15, 1791. The seals are an encryption, both front and back. They will tell you how to read the 2nd amendment in the manner I did. It was another avenue to this secret. It is the fact that the “clue plaque” exists that tells us that there was something going on. Perhaps a conspiracy, but no theory of mine. If the 2nd amendment existed prior to the constitutional convention, and it is something other than what it has been known to be with only its English as your guide, then the constitutional convention must have been orchestrated in advance.

Here is the puzzle chamber that Benjamin Franklin had created with only three objects inside. The plaques.

Behind these walls is a 3x5 foot chamber. This place is inside a pyramid which is 26 miles from Philadelphia. I have provided a link to the source video below. It is on the outskirts of Quakertown PA.

Front and back of the United States Seals, as finalized in 1782.

The third plaque and the fact that it exists. It is the “Clue Plaque” that will tell us how to actually read the 2nd amendment in the manner that I demonstrated to you above.

Here is that video.

I’m not going to transcribe the entire book here. It’s 193,000 words and cites over 75 letters. It does however require a peer review but at the moment , the only people that have my back on this are some of the framers. 84 years of letters, at least, where the first one was written in 1752.

Just as a genius would not ride a crow, in reality, a genius would not go hand fishing for lightning, because, well , that would be stupid. So why did Benjamin Franklin document “the kite experiment’ in 1752? Remember , he was a word smith, and words have different meanings. A kite for instance also means “a person who preys upon others”.

Think about this..

A line (2A) with a key near its front (the word “Militia but only when read objectively which transforms the sentence into an equation) in anticipation of flashes and bangs with a kite flying around at whim. At this time in history Benjamin Franklin was working on his Albany Plan which has been recognized as being a primitive template to a constitution that was to be drafted 35 years later. The Albany plan didn’t work out and he had to wait but he was still determined to “invent” the United States of America. From this time forward he was very careful not to give any appearance of a gun debate because he knew that suspicion was the worst enemy to what may be soon be considered the longest running sociological experiment in human history. In the twilight of his life he recruited carefully selected intelligent men who were also skilled in the written word, some of them being as much as 45 years younger than he that would be tasked to craft these letters for a future time to help reveal the final legacy of their constitution. The sheer volume of their labor is almost an apology but how could they have known how fast society would advance or the advent of massive industries with their own marketing campaigns which was to include the rhetoric of the 2nd amendment and tap into the passions of patriotism.

The final letter that I was able to locate was written by James Madison in 1834. He stated that it was to be opened after his death, which occurred only two years later. I suspect part of the reason he wanted it opened after his death, is because otherwise he would have been asked to explain just what he was talking about. In 1836 though, that would have been too early. It is a short little letter and it talks of Pandora’s box having been opened.

“c. 1834

[1830–1836]

As this advice, if it ever see the light will not do it till I am no more it may be considered as issuing from the tomb where truth alone can be respected, and the happiness of man alone consulted. It will be entitled therefore to whatever weight can be derived from good intentions, and from the experience of one, who has served his Country in various stations through a period of forty years, who espoused in his youth and adhered through his life to the cause of its liberty, and who has borne a part in most of the great transactions which will constitute epochs of its destiny.

The advice nearest to my heart and deepest in my convictions is that the Union of the States be cherished & perpetuated. Let the open enemy to it be regarded as a Pandora with her box opened; and the disguised one, as the Serpent creeping with his deadly wiles into Paradise. “

Spoiler Alert Reading the Clue Plaque

Clue plaque from associated video

It is going to be awkward for the Supreme Court of the United States to argue against this new research. Any, and all precedents set regarding the 2nd amendment in the past will have to be fully nullified and reversed. This affirms conclusively that they got it wrong.

This Future is your Right if you are American

“shall not be infringed”

Summary

There have been over 900 people that have viewed this article at the time of this update. There are been 225 people that have read it. This is the context of history that has never been known before.

These are the men that have authored these letters. They are ciphers and I stumbled across their key.

Here is a tutorial on ciphers and keys and how they work.

This was the 45th letter that I had already located in my research in about March of 2016.

Literary Sleight of Hand

The 2nd Amendment was crafted by Benjamin Franklin but crafted as a literary sleight of hand. It was crafted so that it would be ratified by the other delegates who would read what they wanted too.

I located the following letter at ww.franklinpapers.org which is a cipher that points back to the 2nd amendment like a laser beam. While I completely understand that it is inconsistent with “known” history, known history has been “distorted” as per Thomas Jefferson’s letter of June 12, 1823. In modern terms it is now an alternative fact and will probably take some time to erase the residue of it.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”.

From — — — (unpublished)

[ca. Dec. 1776]

In whatever business you may have to do with Foreigners, sign never any thing that is not in English let them take the Pains to express themselves. My reading has furnishd me with Cases where great Tricks have been playd by means of Foreigners giving a sense of their own to words not so taken by the others. There are Equivocal Expressions. One may take the gingerbread for the Baker

Note the use of capital letters which I have set to bold. I have notices that capitals are used extensively in the ciphers I have been locating, including the 2nd amendment itself. There purpose is of course for emphasis, or hints to the reader to study the nature of the word itself. Its a redirection to the truth of the context.

Foreigner = anyone without knowledge of the 2nd amendments secret. It is written in “English”. To read what human nature wants is to read it subjectively or “the right to keep and bear Arms”. To read that would of course take great “Pains” in that it would cause oppression to a society due to the inevitable increase of gun violence. The “Cases” pertain to the capital letters in the 2nd amendment which are hints to look closer at those words. “Militia”, “State” and “Arms”. Two of these words have other meanings and are Tricks in that this one sentence is in fact a literary sleight of hand so that it would become chiseled into the Bill of Rights. The “Baker” is the author and he has cooked up something that is easily consumed by “We the People” being “ginger bread” or in other words “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms”

Benjamin Franklin saw no distinction between “tyrant” and “criminal” because just under their surface resides a human being and his nature. He is prone to both accident, nefarious intent and fear. It takes more energy and perceived sacrifice to think of others above oneself. We all know the logic of this in an all to familiar argument which I will word just a bit differently to drive this point home. “Why should a law abiding president be penalized by a tyrant with the checks and balances as instilled in the United States Constitution?”. If you can answer that then you are on the same page as the framers if you can resolve it back to the 2nd amendment. There is no cure for “human nature” and thus criminals or the mentally ill, so why empower them in the first place in the context of the fine print “We the People”?

The Supreme Court violated the United States Constitution through no fault of their own because they too are just humans with their own biases hidden under robe. This research is the dynamite that will ultimately result in Liberty but first it needs someone to light the fuse. This is more than just a man trying to sell a book. It reveals the final legacy of the United States Constitution and an astonishing amount of labor that spans 82 years for the future of a nation.

With kind regards and godspeed,

Geoffrey Smith (“Candid a friend to Truth”)

New cover. This volume is currently undergoing final editing and will be released soon.

https://www.amazon.com/Militia-Stand-Down-Objective-Amendment-ebook/dp/B074B1Q1VF/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1501441260&sr=1-1&keywords=Militia+Stand+Down