Pandemics Explained By Terrain Theory
Tags: Influenza, Germ Theory, Environment, Pandemic, Corona

Another example of pollution being heavily correlated with environmental pollution is — once again — China. Peng et. al examined the role of air pollutants on an incidence of a measles outbreak in Lanzhou and came to the following conclusion:

“By collecting daily data on measles cases, air pollutants, and meteorological data from 2005 to 2009 in Chengguan District of Lanzhou City, semi-parametric generalized additive model (GAM) was used to quantitatively study the impact of air pollutants and meteorological factors on daily measles cases. The results showed that air pollutants and meteorological factors had effect on the number of daily measles cases, and there was a certain lag effect. Except for SO2 and relative humidity, other factors showed statistically significant associations with daily measles cases: NO 2 lag 6 days, PM 10 and maximum temperature lag 5 days, minimum temperature and average temperature and average air pressure lag 4 days, visibility, and wind speed lag 3 days had the greatest impact on the number of daily measles cases”

Measles epidemics correlate with cold weather, when indoor pollution (stoves, boilers, and earth plumes) is contained by closed windows. According to Dolan 1985, stove exhaust can cause “flu like” symptoms. The New York Times — while covering the epidemic — casually mentions the link between indoor pollution and asthma. It’s important that much like Sars Cov 2, the measles virus has never been isolated and proven to cause said disease. You read Stefan Lanka’s article here. The same is holds true for the alleged polio virus. In the expert opinion of biochemist Howard Urnovitz, PhD:

“Poliovirus was not actually isolated by these investigators, either. They successfully grew “filterable agents,” which they assumed to be poliovirus, in human embryonic tissues.”

Resolving the “unvaccinated” issue

The major news outlets claimed that the measles outbreak spread mostly among unvaccinated children in various New York neighborhoods. As we have previously discussed, a toxic environment combined with weather conditions have a large impact on the occurrences of measles. So why is it that only the unvaccinated seem to be only ones effected? Is it really because religious anti-vaxx parents put their children in harm’s way? One can easily argue that any parent is putting a child in harm’s way by raising them in such toxic environments.

In any case, the reason that that this outbreak seemed to have effected almost exclusively unvaccinated children is simply due to confirmation bias. Doctors — — under their faith-based belief that vaccines work — are more likely to diagnose a disease as something else in vaccinated persons. This is simply human nature. The Center for Disease Control actually instructs doctors to do this in the context of outbreaks.

“To minimize the problem of false positive laboratory results, it is important to restrict case investigation and laboratory tests to patients most likely to have measles (i.e., those who meet the clinical case definition, especially if they have risk factors for measles, **such as being unvaccinated** [my emphasis]recent history of travel abroad, without an alternate explanation for symptoms, for example epi-linked to known parvovirus case) or those with fever and generalized maculopapular rash with strong suspicion of measles.”

Therefore, any case numbers derived from uncontrolled human observation are intrinsically biased by belief in vaccination success itself, making it circular in nature and woefully unscientific. The belief is a self-fulfilling prophecy. This bias explains why the disease is “found” more often in unvaccinated individuals and also why its “incidence” declined as the numbers of vaccinated grew. One might argue that it is not possible to mistake these diseases for others. However, were that true then there would be no need for differential diagnosis nor laboratory confirmation when diagnosing them, a requirement for almost all VPDs (Vaccine Preventable Diseases).

This behavior by the medical authorities was also absorbed 5 years ago during the Disney World measles outbreak. They performed 2500+ PCR tests on suspected cases *after rash presentation began*, i.e. cases that looked exactly like measles. Only 131 were confirmed to have the virus. If the “outbreak” of rashes were truly caused by the virus then it is implausible that only 5% of clinical rash cases had the purported causative factor.

Health officials find what they set out to find. It makes for great narrative but awful science.

Great Smog of London

The Great Smog event that took place in London, UK in 1952 was the result of a mixture of factors. The main culprits were air pollution, unusually cold temperatures and windless days. This resulted in a dangerous accumulation of air pollutants, which in turn led to the smog. This is what London looked like during the smog event

Some 6000 Londoners perished as a result of the smog. The authorities had initially attempted to blame the respiratory infections on an influenza epidemic but it became clear that the main cause was the pollution. There was no panic, as London was infamous for its fog. In the weeks that ensued, however, statistics compiled by medical services found that the fog had killed 4,000 people. Only a small minority of cases were actually linked to influenza. Most of the deaths were caused by respiratory tract infections, from hypoxia and as a result of mechanical obstruction of the air passages by pus arising from lung infections caused by the smog, according to a paper published by Peters et al in The Lancet.

The Black Plague

The Black Death was an outbreak of disease that killed millions of people across Europe and Asia. Most people think that the disease was the bubonic plague. Around 50 million people were killed by the bubonic plague, and was at its worst between 1347 and 1351. The disease may have started in Asia. This disease is carried and spread by fleas living on rats. Traders from the Silk Road (a group of trading routes that went across Asia to the Mediterranean sea) may have brought the infected fleas to Europe. The mainstream theory is that fleas.

Bubonic plague disease is said to be caused by a bacterium named Yersinia Pestis. This bacterium has also been found in other types of plagues such as Septicemic plague and pneumonic plague. DNA from this bacterium has also been found in DNA from victims of the Justinian Plague¹. Mainstream thinking has concluded that rats and other rodents carry Yersinia pestis and pass it along to fleas. When rats die, the blood-sucking fleas leave them to prey on other rats, dogs, and humans. The bacterium then enters humans through mosquito bites. Modern science believes that the time of Justinian, rats on merchants ships carried the microorganism to the other Mediterranean ports²

However, some investigators have found some flaws with the theory that the bacterium was the main culprit in the black death. Although researchers found evidence of Yersina pestis in dental pulp from a mass grave of the period in France, other teams of scientists were unable to find evidence of the pathogen in five other grave sites from other parts of Europe³. Sociologist Susan Scott and biologist Christopher J. Duncan claim that a hemorrhage fever , similar to Ebola virus, caused the Black Death. Others blame anthrax or some now-extinct disease. They note that medieval accounts don't square descriptions of the illness. Witnesses described a disease that spread at great speed with very high mortality, unlike other pandemics or plagues, which moves slowly and had a death rate of about 60%⁴. Accounts described buboes covering the entire body rather than limited to the groin area as in the case of the plague. Symptom descriptions mention awful odors, splotches resembling bruises, delirium, and stupor — none of which happen with modern day bubonic plagues. The bacterium theory with regard to the black death doesn’t explain the rapid spread and it’s strikingly high mortality rate⁵

Another explanation for the Black Death is that it came from infected rats and then spread to humans across Europe. One of the main problems with this theory is that there are no written documents from the era that describe vast legions of dead rats required to explain the plague. The plague killed over half of Iceland’s population but rats didn’t reach the country until about the 19th century.⁶ And the Black Death continued to kill people during the winder in most of northern Europe despite the fat that the plague organism requires relatively warm temperatures.⁷-mike bailie, pg.12].

In New Light on the Black Death: The Cosmic Connection, Professor Emeritus of Paleoecology Mike Baillie argues that a comet caused the pandemic. He points out that witnesses of the period describe a significant earthquake on January 25, 1348, with other earthquakes to follow. “There have been masses of dead fish, animals, and other things along with the sea shore and in many places covered in dust”,⁸ wrote a contemporary observer. “And all these things seem to have come from the great corruption of the air and earth”⁹ Other documents describe tidal waves, rains of fire, foul odors and strange colors in the sky, mists and even dragons, in addition to earthquakes. Baillie believes fragments from Comet Negra, which passed by the Earth in 1347, caused the atmospheric phenomena. Some fragments descended and injected huge amounts of dust into the atmosphere. Tree ring analysis indicates that as the material descended from space, it spewed large amounts of chemicals based on carbon and nitrogen into the stratosphere. According to Baillie, illness and death resulted from poisoned water and air as the comet flew overhead.¹⁰

All the symptoms of the Black Death — especially bruises like blotches on the kin and high fatality rates — strongly indicate radiation poisoning, probably rendered even more deadly by dust and ammonia-like compounds in the atmosphere. Prof. Bailie concludes that :

“The Black Death sits in a clear environmental trough visible in smoothed tree ring chronologies from around the world”¹¹— Bailie 37]

The corruption of the atmosphere must have certainly been severe to have been able to generate a “clear environmental trough”; it was sufficiently severe to have been able to cause death from respiratory problems. Curiously enough, there were other incidences of pandemics occurring after a major comet. There were other previous pandemics in history that were potentially connected to comets and other events in nature. For example, Dr. Marc Barton from the Imperial College of London also theorizes that natural occurring events such as comets, volcanoes and drastic climate changes may have been co-factors in previous pandemics.

Influenza Epidemics

As early as 1799, researchers became puzzled over the cause of influenza, which appeared suddenly, often in diverse places at the same time. The world was not as globalized as it is today and so the contagion theory would not hold much water in this case. In 1836, influenza specialist Heinrich Schweich noted that all physiological processed produce electricity and theorized that an electrical disturbance of the atmosphere may prevent the body from discharging it. He believed that the over accumulation of electricity can be a cause for influenza symptoms.¹².

With the discovery of the sun’s electrical nature, scientists have made some very interesting observations. The period 1645–1715 is one that astronomers call the “Maunder Minimum” and the sun was very quite during this time and no sunspot activity was observed. In 1715, sunspots reappeared again as did the northern lights and activity reached its peak in 1727. In 1728, influenza appeared in waves on every continent. Sunspot activities become more violent until they peaked in 1738, when physicians reported flu in both man and animals.¹³ British epidemiologist Edgar Stanhope-Smith believed that the rate of transmissibility was determined by Vitamin D deficiency and seasonal variabilities. However, as we have seen in the germ theory article, no study to date has been able to demonstrate transmissibility from one individual to another.

Researcher and activist Arthurs Firstenberg, in his book The Invisible Rainbow, chronicles the history of electricity in the United States and throughout the world, and the outbreaks of illnesses that accompanied each step towards greater electrification. The first stage involved the installation of the telephone line and by 1975, these formed a spider web over the earth totaling 700 000 miles, with enough copper wire to encircle the global almost 30 times. With these new technological advancements, came new diseases. Citizens living in vicinity of these newly installed electrical wires reported symptoms such as headaches, dizziness, tinnitus, floaters in the eyes, racing pulse, pains in the heart region and palpitations. Some also reported feeling severely depressed and having unusual panic attacks. Dr. George Miller Beard and the medical community at the time also observed that these symptoms spread along the routes of railroad and telephone lines; these symptoms also closely resembled the flu.¹³(Miller Beard -cases of hysteria, neurosthenia).

In 1889, we mark the beginning of the modern electrical era and also of a deadly flu pandemic, which followed the advent of electricity through the globe. According to Firstenberg:

“Influenza struck explosively and unpredictably, over and over in waves until early 1894. It was as if something fundamental had changed in the atmosphere”¹³

If influenza is primarily an electrical disease as is suggested by the first waves of flu pandemics, then the flu is not contagious in the conventional sense. The patters of its epidemics should provide this, and they do. For example, the deadly 1889 pandemic began in a number of widely scattered parts of the world. Severe outbreaks were reported that year in Uzbekistan, Greenland, Bukhara and northern Alberta, Canada. That same time period, flu outbreaks were also reported in parts of the US, the Balkans and Australia¹⁴(JAMA 1890a, The influenza pandemic of 1889, 14(1), 24–25). This pattern of disease being at odds with prevailing theories, many historians have pretended that the 1889 pandemic until it arrived in western Siberia in September and from there it spread in an orderly fashion in the rest of the world. It spread to the rest of Russia but also parts of Africa at the same time¹⁵ (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889325/) ¹⁶(Clemow, Frank Girard: The Geography of Disease, Cambridge U. Press,p.198). According to Bowie et al, this influenza pandemic also hit the continent, which was the first of its kind. According to Benjamin Lee of the Pennsylvania State Board of Health: