Covid-19 pandemic, an intentional chain murder run by governments, or just an unstoppable misfortune?
By: Ehsan Javanbakht
Tags: User Research, Virus, Covid 19, Pandemic, Vaccines

Now that the epidemic is nearing its end, an important question remains unanswered: “Were governments capable of halting this pandemic but chose not to?”

During the rigorous war against Covid-19, almost 4.24 million people have died and over 199 million people were infected by this virus. Our nurses and doctors have spent many days and nights away from their loved ones in tight white clothing with glasses and masks, jeopardizing their lives in numerous hospitals around the world. People began to question if there was any way to treat this illness, and governments have responded negatively to this day, however, I highly doubt it…

On March 18th, 2020, Leon Caly and his colleagues conducted an antiviral study, to see how a medication named “Ivermectin” affected the propagation of the Covid-19 virus in vitro[1]. Ivermectin, an FDA-approved drug, was initially developed in the late 1970s as an antiparasitic medicine, but scientists later discovered that it also possesses antiviral effects against a wide spectrum of viruses. They predicted that the nuclear transport inhibitory action of ivermectin may be useful against SARS-CoV-2. Surprisingly, the results of this trial were positive. Therefore, they explained:

“To test the antiviral activity of ivermectin towards SARS-CoV-2, we infected Vero/hSLAM cells with SARS-CoV-2 isolate Australia/VIC01/2020 at an MOI of 0.1 for 2h, followed by the addition of 5 μM ivermectin. Supernatant and cell pellets were harvested at days 0–3 and analysed by RT-PCR for the replication of SARS-CoV-2 RNA . At 24h, there was a 93% reduction in viral RNA present in the supernatant (indicative of released virions) of samples treated with ivermectin compared to the vehicle DMSO. Similarly a 99.8% reduction in cell-associated viral RNA (indicative of unreleased and unpackaged virions) was observed with ivermectin treatment. By 48h, this effect increased to an ~5000-fold reduction of viral RNA in ivermectin-treated compared to control samples, indicating that ivermectin treatment resulted in the effective loss of essentially all viral material by 48h. Consistent with this idea, no further reduction in viral RNA was observed at 72h.”

Nevertheless, several countries, including the United States, have shown little interest in pursuing further study to obtain more precise data, at least not right away. After a whole year, in 2021, more articles were released, providing us with more evidence to assess the efficacy of Ivermectin as a Covid-19 therapy. In a paper by Carlos Chaccoor and his team[2], the ivermectin was tested on patients with non-severe COVID-19 and the trial’s findings are as follows:

“All patients recruited completed the trial (median age, 26 [IQR 19–36 in the ivermectin and 21–44 in the controls] years; 12 [50%] women; 100% had symptoms at recruitment, 70% reported headache, 62% reported fever, 50% reported general malaise and 25% reported cough). At day 7, there was no difference in the proportion of PCR positive patients (RR 0·92, 95% CI: 0·77–1·09, p = 1·0). The ivermectin group had non-statistically significant lower viral loads at day 4 (p = 0·24 for gene E; p = 0·18 for gene N) and day 7 (p = 0·16 for gene E; p = 0·18 for gene N) post treatment as well as lower IgG titers at day 21 post treatment (p = 0·24). Patients in the ivermectin group recovered earlier from hyposmia/anosmia (76 vs 158 patient-days; p < 0.001).”

They continued :

“Among patients with non-severe COVID-19 and no risk factors for severe disease receiving a single 400 mcg/kg dose of ivermectin within 72 h of fever or cough onset there was no difference in the proportion of PCR positives. There was however a marked reduction of self-reported anosmia/hyposmia, a reduction of cough and a tendency to lower viral loads and lower IgG titers which warrants assessment in larger trials.”

These results prove that the usage of Ivermectin does reduce the viral loads in the human body and that more studies with more patients should be done in the future to assure this conclusion. On the other hand, the US and some other governments still do not agree and tried hard to prevent the discovery from reaching the public’s ears. How’s that possible? In the beginning of the pandemic when people are dying, scientists discover a possible therapeutic drug, and no immediate action is under investigation. Even after there is some more research a year later, still no immediate action has been done to try it on a larger scale. They developed a vaccine that is far more difficult to test than this medicine and had it approved in less than a year, but the FDA website still states[3] :

“Though this is understandable, please beware. The FDA’s job is to carefully evaluate the scientific data on a drug to be sure that it is both safe and effective for a particular use, and then to decide whether or not to approve it. Using any treatment for COVID-19 that’s not approved or authorized by the FDA, unless part of a clinical trial, can cause serious harm.”

Why should it matter to someone in ICU who is suffering from Covid-19 and is already dying? This either works or the person dies as a result of the infection… And, according to another investigation, the chances of his surviving by taking the drug are far greater than the chances of him surviving without it.

Juliana Cepelowicz Rajter and her colleagues published another work in Chest that attempts to investigate the influence of Ivermectin on mortality rates in hospitalized patients[4]. They tend to answer the following question: “Does ivermectin benefit hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients?” Apparently, the answer was very positive:

“Two hundred eighty patients, 173 treated with ivermectin and 107 without ivermectin, were reviewed. Most patients in both groups also received hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, or both. Univariate analysis showed lower mortality in the ivermectin group (15.0% vs 25.2%; OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29–0.96; P ¼ .03). Mortality also was lower among ivermectin-treated patients with severe pulmonary involvement (38.8% vs 80.7%; OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05–0.47; P ¼ .001). No significant differences were found in extubation rates (36.1% vs 15.4%; OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 0.88–11.00; P ¼ .07) or length of stay. After multivariate adjustment for confounders and mortality risks, the mortality difference remained significant (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09–0.80; P ¼ .03). One hundred ninety-six patients were included in the propensity-matched cohort. Mortality was significantly lower in the ivermectin group (13.3% vs 24.5%; OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22–0.99; P < .05), an 11.2% (95% CI, 0.38%- 22.1%) absolute risk reduction, with a number needed to treat of 8.9 (95% CI, 4.5–263).”

Thus, they concluded:

“Ivermectin treatment was associated with lower mortality during treatment of COVID-19, especially in patients with severe pulmonary involvement. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.”

Nonetheless, the US still ignores the positive outcomes of Ivermectin against Covid-19 to this day and people are still dying. But, several countries have begun to liberally give this medicine to diseased patients. For example, in early May 2021, India was in a terrible situation, with cases increasing at an exponential rate, so they had no choice but to use Ivermectin across the country to observe if the cases decrease or not. The results were incredible! It didn’t take long for the number of cases to drop dramatically. Soon after, Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care tweeted: “Case counts and deaths are falling in India! A close look at these new graphs by @jjchamie shows that the declines occurred as the Health Ministry began its widespread distribution of #ivermectin.” Let’s take a close look at the graph.

In this image, you can easily see the quick drop. Yes, Ivermectin saved India, yes, Ivermectin is effective, and yes your deceased parents, relatives and friends would’ve been next to you right now if Ivermectin was at least allowed to be prescribed in hospitals.

However, FDA doesn’t totally deny this, in fact, they stated: “The FDA has not reviewed data to support the use of ivermectin in COVID-19 patients to treat or to prevent COVID-19; however, some initial research is underway.” Yes, dear readers, be hopeful: “they are working on it,” and “they will approve this drug after everyone is vaccinated,” I’m confident. You should also be aware that you MUST NOT use this medication unless it has been prescribed by a doctor.

Now that we know the truth, we might question ourselves, WHY? Why did they just watch our loved ones die in hospitals? Why didn’t they show any attention in using this drug?

Let me answer this with a quote: “Money can earn humans, but kills humanity.” Ivermectin is a very cheap drug, and distributing it would have ended the pandemic within a few months, which is not economically beneficial for some governments.

I always felt that there was something more powerful than money, and that is fear of death. Everyone assumed that this was going to be the end of the world, well I don’t blame them, it had been a long time since we had seen a pandemic right? Let me tell you what my family did when the pandemic first started: they panicked! Yes, my parents began purchasing and stocking the freezer with food. When the freezer became too full, they bought a new freezer and filled it as well, until the door could no longer be closed, so we glued it. What a great time for inflation to rise right? Now let’s take a look at the inflation in the United-States of America during this epidemic.

Even by a simple look, we can observe the inclined peak of inflation percentage for each category. Reuters website announced that[5]: “In the 12 months through June, the CPI jumped 5.4%. That was the largest gain since August 2008 and followed a 5.0% increase in May. Excluding the volatile food and energy components, the CPI accelerated 0.9% after increasing 0.7% in May. The so-called core CPI surged 4.5% on a year-on-year basis, the largest rise since November 1991, after advancing 3.8% in May.”

So why would the government want inflation? Well, The buying power of money is eroded by inflation. People spend more time and energy decreasing their money holdings and less time and energy producing products and services.When as a result, as wages and prices rise, inflation helps the government collect more tax money, and this was a great opportunity since people were so frightened that they didn’t care whether prices rose.

Actually, the economy of US has been increasing even more than before as Fortune magazine explains[6]:

“Fueled by vaccinations and government aid, the U.S. economy grew at a solid 6.5% annual rate last quarter in another sign that the nation has achieved a sustained recovery from the pandemic recession. The total size of the economy has now surpassed its pre-pandemic level.”

“For all of 2021, the economy is expected to expand perhaps as much as 7%. If so, that would be the strongest calendar-year growth since 1984. And it would mark a sharp reversal from last year’s 3.4% economic contraction — the worst in 74 years — as a result of the pandemic.”

As previously said, Ivermectin is a low-cost medication, and its widespread distribution would prevent people from getting vaccinated, making it more difficult to sell and to profit billions of dollars. Even Bill Gates put about $10 billion on vaccines and received $200 billion in return, calling it the best investment he’d ever made[7]. However, I see this as a loop, because of mutations. When the vaccines are all sold out and everyone is vaccinated, it’s feasible to mutate the virus in the lab so the new variant would be resistant to current vaccines, thus the pharmaceutical firms start to make new doses of vaccines, making more money and this goes on and on.

For example, lately, there’s a new variant called the delta variant and we don’t have enough data if the current vaccines work efficiently against it or not. Biostatistician Natalie Dean explains to Nature[8]: “So far, there are no published data on how vaccines affect infections and infectiousness with Delta, but a UK study published on 21 July shows that the Pfizer–BioNTech and Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccines both protect slightly less well against symptomatic disease caused by Delta than against that caused by Alpha. This could also mean a drop in how well they protect against transmission of Delta, but there is still a lot of uncertainty.”

Even with vaccinations, countries such as Japan are seeing an exponential spike in cases, with numbers far higher than previously.

And the same thing is happening in Florida:

But, this is just a hypothesis and only the future will prove its validity.

In summary, Covid-19 was one of the most heinous and enduring tragedies in human history. Still, the FDA is saying that there’s a lack of data to make Ivermectin available to the public and people are still dying in the US and in many other countries because of this virus. Since I was a child, I had seen in a movie how much the police cared about saving each and every one of the victims during a bank heist; all those efforts to save just a few people sounded ridiculous to me, so I always wondered if it was true in real life, but now I think it was just a movie. I’m genuinely sorry for anyone who’s lost members of their family and I hope from the depth of my heart that all this theory is wrong because if it’s true, then we can say with certainty that humanity is broken…

Written By Ehsan Javanakht.

Email: Ehsan.javanbbakht20@gmail.com

References: