Why does Apple Doesn’t use USB c chargers?
Tags: Usbc, Charger, iPad, Apple, iPhone

Why does Apple Doesn’t use USB c chargers?







In the past five years, USB-C has become the go-to connector for a wide range of devices. Its used on most android phones, notebooks, tablets, game consoles, headphones and even accessories like mice, keyboards and external storage drives.



But when it comes to Apple’s most popular product, the iPhone, USB -C has yet to be adopted. Instead, every model of iPhone still uses a lightning connector that was introduced eight years ago with the iPhone5.







This has led people to wonder why Apple has not transitioned the iPhone to USB-C, especially for a company who has a reputation of being the first to adopt new standards.







In this article I am going to explain why Apple hasn’t transitioned the iPhone to USB-C, and what that means for their users. Now why would Apple, the company who adopted USB-A before anyone else with the original iMac, take so long to bring USB-C to their smartphones?







Its pretty bizarre, especially considering they’ve already included it in their iPad and mac Lineup.







Well the answer lies in a story that begins in 2010, When Apple was developing the iPhone 5. The device would be 12% smaller by volume compared to the previous 4S which meant the large 30-pin connector needed to be replaced by something smaller in order to free up space for other components







At the time, Apple was helping to develop the USB-C standard with other companies like Intel, Microsoft, and Samsung. But the new connector wouldn’t be ready until 2014. Two years after the iPhone 5’s release. So, because of this delay Apple was forced into a corner they could either keep the 30-pin connector for another 2 generations and sacrifice the iPhone 5 and 5’s compact designs or they could create their own proprietary connector and cause 2 generations and sacrifice the iPhone 5 and 5’s compact designs or they could create their own proprietary connector and cause fragmentation within not only the smartphone industry but their own product Ecosystem.







It was a lose – lose proposition, but Apple went with the latter option. The decision not only cause a huge amount of backlash from users in 2012, who were frustrated that Apple made all of their previous iPhone accessories obsolete but it’s still causing them issues to this very day.







For example, when USB-C was ready to go in 2014, Apple wasn’t in a position to transition the iPhone lineup a second time, and just two years later.







They knew they had to stick with lightning for as long as possible, or else they would be in for a PR nightmare.







So they persisted, and when the AirPods were introduced in 2016,



Apple was forced to use the same connector as the iPhone, since the two products were designed to be used together seamlessly.







So lightning was introduced to yet another product line. One that would expand into the AirPods pro and AirPods max which also had to use lightning to maintain consistency between models.







Its almost like there was a smaller iPhone Ecosystem that existed within the larger Apple Ecosystem.







Because while the iPhone and its accessories continued to use lightning almost every other Apple product adopted USB-C. The Macbook line began the transition in 2015, the iPad line in 2018, and the Mac pro in 2019.







You also have to consider the other controversial changes Apple made with the iPhone in previous years.







They removed the headphone jack in 2016, and they removed the wall from the iPhones packaging in 2020.







Both of these decisions caused perhaps even more backlash than the transition to lightning in 2012, and caused Apple to think twice before moving to USB-C, which would only add fuel to the fire.







So how can we expect Apple to resolve this connector fragmentation issue in the future?







Well, rumors are suggesting that it won’t be resolved, since Apple isn’t planning on transitioning the iPhone to USB-c at all. Instead they are exploring the possibility of removing the connector from certain iPhone models entirely.







There are n benefits to this approach. The A smartphone with no port would be more water resistant since it’s Chassis could be completely sealed off and it would be more durable. The since inserting and removing a connector thousands of times can cause wear, it is buildup of debris, and contact issues.







But how would the phone be charged without a port?







Well, Apple has already implemented a solution with the iPhone 12 lineup. The models have something called magsafe, but which is essentially a qi wireless charger surrounded by a ring of magnets.







This makes the charging experience very similar to an Apple Watch, a device that also happens to be port less.







And if Apple wants to include wireless data pass through, they can simply borrow the smart connector from the iPad.







Everything Apple needs to create a port-less iPhone already exists, and it only seems to be a matter of time before they make the transition away from wired connectors entirely.







At that point, the I think each category of Apple device will of their own unique methods of charging. Their computers and iPads, and which Apple has been calling computer replacements anyway, but will feature USB-C and iPads, and which Apple has been calling computer replacements anyway, so will feature USB-C. Their mobile devices like the iPhone and Apple Watch will feature convenient grab and go magnetic wireless charging.







While accessories like the AirPods, magic mouse and Magic Keyboard will continue to use lightning with wireless charging available when possible as a convenience feature. This approach makes the most sense to me, but we’ll have to wait and see what decisions.







Apple makes with the release of new products in the near future.







Thank you for taking your valuable time and reading this let me know your thoughts in the comments. Kindly like and subscribe to help motivating us to write and cover more topics.