Which is important for fat loss: Diet or Workout?
By: Yashovardhan Singh
Tags: Diet, Bodybuilding, Workout, Writer, Fitness

With only a few days till the new year, most gym-goers are dreaming about sculpting a summer physique. Following the overindulgence of the holiday season, many of us could use it to lose a few pounds. At this time of year, most people’s main goal is to lose weight. The good news is that losing weight is uncomplicated. The bad news is that it isn’t simple.

When all is said and done, regularly generating a calorie deficit is the most critical aspect for effective fat reduction. When you consume fewer calories than are necessary to maintain your present body weight, you are in a caloric deficit.

To create a calorie deficit, do the following:

1) Lower calorie intake

2) Increase your output aka burn calories

3) A combination of the first and second points

You will lose weight if you maintain a calorie deficit regularly. Isn’t it straightforward?

So, what’s the best way to lose weight and maintain a calorie deficit? Is it better to diet or exercise?

To explain the influence of food and exercise, some experts like to use percentages or ratios. For example, it is commonly stated that fat reduction is made up of 80% food and 20% exercise. “As a rule of thumb, weight loss is often 75 per cent food and 25 per cent activity,” says Dr Shawn Talbott.

Spoiler alert: If you want to improve your outcomes, you’ll need to pay attention to both. In that regard, I am strong of the opinion that fat loss is a combination of nutrition and exercise.

Photo by Louis Hansel on Unsplash

There is a synergistic impact when you eat and work out properly. The 1=1=3 impact is the consequence of your fat loss efforts. To put it another way, when you combine smart diet regimens with efficient workout routines, you look even better. This is because you not only reduce fat but also maintain muscle mass. That, in my opinion, is the true purpose of a reasonable fat reduction phase for physique-conscious athletes.

But what if you just had to pick one? Which one will offer you the most bang for your buck?

Diet case:

It’s a lot easier to cut calories than to burn them. Eating smarter to achieve a 500-calorie loss takes some self-control, but it’s doable for everyone. Exercise, on the other hand, takes a lot of time and effort to burn 500 calories.

For example, for the average man, this translates to more than four miles of jogging. Given that a pound of fat contains around 3,500 calories, if you maintained eating at maintenance, you’d have to lace up your sneakers and exercise almost four miles a day to lose a pound each week. When it’s all said and done, you’ll have run over a marathon a week for one pound!

Exercise is unproductive for the ordinary individual, according to research. You may get slim and skinny by reducing your food, but you will become thin and lose alot of muscle in the process. That is something no one wants. So only dieting and not working out might not be suitable for you.

Workout Case:

You don’t have to exercise to get skinny; just because you can does not imply you should. While exercise might not burn as many calories as many people believe, it can still help you lose weight. Focusing solely on the calories burned side of the energy balance equation is ineffective. You can’t out-exercise a bad diet, after all. Having said that, it’s worth noting that hard training can help you lose weight by increasing your energy expenditure and creating a calorie deficit.

Exercise is essential for increasing fat reduction while limiting muscle loss. Without it, there’s a good probability that muscle and bone density loss will account for a significant portion of your weight reduction.

Because training encourages the growth of certain metabolic tissues, it sends a strong signal to the body to maintain muscle mass and bone density. When you lose weight through activity, you’re burning primarily fat while maintaining your gains. When you’re in a calorie deficit, lifting weights is the most efficient approach to keep muscle mass.

To get a strong and lean body, you must mix a healthy diet with an effective workout. When both are used together, a synergistic effect occurs, in which fat loss is increased but muscle mass is preserved. The important thing to remember is that strength training aids in the preservation of muscle mass. During a fat-loss phase, this is its primary function. It isn’t a very efficient approach to burn a lot of calories.

Photo by Ryan Snaadt on Unsplash

Fatloss workouts are stupid!

When you’re working out to lose weight, it’s tempting to focus on burning as many calories as possible. As a result, “fat loss” workouts have been developed. To be honest, I believe this is absurd! When compared to showing modest dietary constraints, a single workout burns very few calories. One candy bar is about equivalent to 30 minutes of high-intensity exercise. It is far more efficient to avoid the candy bar rather than try to burn it off.

Instead of doing useless fat-burning circuits or hours of running, I recommend using the gym to transmit a muscle-building (or at the very least retaining) signal. Lift weights and set a goal for yourself to gain muscle while losing fat. You won’t gain considerable muscle growth while in a calorie deficit unless you’re a novice, but you will keep it. As a result, instead of looking slender at the end of your fat reduction efforts, you’ll seem muscular and lean.

It means that throughout a fat-loss phase, the workout prescription should be “what built it best, keeps it best.” As a result, your bulking and cutting workouts shouldn’t be too dissimilar. Consider training to be a car, and diet to be the steering wheel. You’re continually working out to grow muscle, but your food determines whether you gain or lose weight.

To hammer the point, cardiovascular activity is ineffective at retaining muscle mass. In one study, researchers divided participants into two groups: diet + cardio and diet + resistance training. Both groups lost weight, but the cardio group lost 9 pounds of lean mass! The resistance training group, on the other hand, acquired 2 pounds of lean mass.

Participants in another research were divided into three groups.

1) Diet.

2) Diet and exercise

3) Resistance training + diet.

Although all of these groups lost weight, only the diet + resistance exercise group maintained lean mass. Furthermore, a 2015 meta-analysis found that diet with strength exercise improves body composition more effectively than diet alone or cardio and diet.

Photo by Total Shape on Unsplash

In light of this information, I believe that calorie deficit should be achieved by dietary modifications rather than training adjustments and that strength training should be used to preserve muscle mass. It offers a couple of advantages:

Controlling energy balance through nutrition is easier to assess and more effective.

Resistance exercise should be used, to build muscle growth and strength, not just to raise energy expenditure.

Significantly increasing workout volume to burn more calories interferes with recuperation capability. When you’re in a calorie deficit, your hormones may react negatively, increasing the danger of muscle loss and/or preventing fat reduction.

Cardio can help you lose weight by creating a calorie deficit, but it won’t help you keep muscle mass, therefore it shouldn’t be your primary style of training for building a strong and lean body.

The important message is that diet and exercise work together to maximise fat reduction. Do you want to build a muscular, powerful, and shredded body? Focus on both nutrition and exercise, but if time is short, keep in mind that what you eat is the most important factor. It’s far more practical to cut calories through food than trying to burn them off through activity.

It’s never a good idea to try to “out-exercise” a terrible diet! If you’re stuffing doughnuts into your face faster than Homer Simpson, no amount of training will help you lose weight.