| "{\"id\": \"6279526\", \"name\": \"McKown v. McDonald\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"McKown v. McDonald\", \"decision_date\": \"1928-05-01\", \"docket_number\": \"No. 18434\", \"first_page\": \"258\", \"last_page\": \"258\", \"citations\": \"130 Okla. 258\", \"volume\": \"130\", \"reporter\": \"Oklahoma Reports\", \"court\": \"Oklahoma Supreme Court\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Oklahoma\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-11T02:39:43.330789+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"MASON, Y. O. J., and HARRISON, LESTER, CLARK, and RILEY, JJ., concur.\", \"parties\": \"McKown v. McDonald.\", \"head_matter\": \"McKown v. McDonald.\\nNo. 18434.\\nOpinion Filed May 1, 1928.\\nGoode & Dierker, for plaintiff in error.\\nPark Wyatt and S. F. Bailey, for defendant in error.\", \"word_count\": \"131\", \"char_count\": \"775\", \"text\": \"HUNT, J.\\nThe identical question here presented was involved in 18426, Omer Me-Kown v. Sherman Haught, this day decided (130 Okla. 156), and by stipulation of the parties these cases were submitted on the same briefs. We have examined the record in the instant case, and find ample evidence to support the findings of the trial court andt the judgment rendered thereon. The decision in McKown v. Haught, supra, is therefore controlling here, and, upon authority of that case, it is ordered that the judgment therein be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.\\nMASON, Y. O. J., and HARRISON, LESTER, CLARK, and RILEY, JJ., concur.\"}" |