| "{\"id\": \"12573818\", \"name\": \"In the Matter of the Marriage of: John MASON, Respondent, v. Tatyana MASON, Petitioner.\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Mason v. Mason\", \"decision_date\": \"2019-03-06\", \"docket_number\": \"No. 96438-6\", \"first_page\": \"272\", \"last_page\": \"272\", \"citations\": \"435 P.3d 272\", \"volume\": \"435\", \"reporter\": \"Pacific Reporter 3d\", \"court\": \"Washington Supreme Court\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Washington\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-27T21:04:16.902165+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"Fastcase\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"In the Matter of the Marriage of: John MASON, Respondent,\\nv.\\nTatyana MASON, Petitioner.\", \"head_matter\": \"In the Matter of the Marriage of: John MASON, Respondent,\\nv.\\nTatyana MASON, Petitioner.\\nNo. 96438-6\\nSupreme Court of Washington.\\nDATED at Olympia, Washington, March 6, 2019.\\nORDER\", \"word_count\": \"160\", \"char_count\": \"934\", \"text\": \"\\u00b6 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, Gonz\\u00e1lez and Yu, considered at its March 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.\\n\\u00b6 2 IT IS ORDERED:\\n\\u00b6 3 The petition for review is denied. The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a reply to the answer to the petition for review, motion for a continuance, and motion to accept the reply to the answer to the petition for review are all denied. The Respondent's motion to strike the reply to the answer to the petition for review and the Respondent's request for attorney fees are both denied.\\nFor the Court\\n/s/ Fairhurst, CJ. CHIEF JUSTICE\"}" |