Date: 201302
Local time of day: 1801-2400
Location: ZZZ.Airport, US
Light: Night
Aircraft: B757-200
Operator: Air Carrier
Operating under: Part 121
Flight phase: Parked
Aircraft component: Aircraft Documentation
Reporter organization: Air Carrier
Reporter function: Technician
Reporter qualification: Maintenance Airframe; Maintenance Powerplant
Human factors: Communication Breakdown; Situational Awareness; Time Pressure; Workload
Anomaly: Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy
Detector: Person Maintenance
When detected: Other During Maintenance
Result: General None Reported / Taken
Contributing factors: Aircraft; Company Policy; Human Factors
Primary problem: Company Policy

Narrative: During an overnight 757 'B' Check; ZZZ Management continually request Aircraft Maintenance Technicians (AMTs) to transfer [maintenance discrepancy] items from the Higher Check to Lower Checks or no checks in the morning; in order to benefit the operation; circumventing a higher check's authorization or to look good on their statistics. When items are generated against a Check regardless of what they are; a Higher Check should never be 'Closed-out'; or downgraded without the items being either corrected or deferred as per our Air Carrier's MEL; CDL or Non-Essential Function (NEF) policy at minimum; during the period of that Check. I can give an easy example of why this is important let's say on a B-Check; an Aircraft Mechanic finds a tire beyond B-Check Limits and writes up the tire (i.e. Found Number 7 MLG tire worn to limits; less than 3/32' of an inch remaining; requires replacement.) Let's say they want to 'Close-out' a B-Check because they have a part [tire] on order so they then transfer the tire item out of B-Check status to a Logbook write-up while they are waiting for the part. They want their statistics to look good so they transfer items to 'Close' the Check out. A new Mechanic is now assigned to the Aircraft and does a Routine Check. He does not know why the item was originally generated; he then checks the tire and it is within limits as per the General Manual (GM) and being a Ramp Mechanic he then signs-off the tire (i.e. measured tire at 1/32' of an inch tread wear [remaining]; within limits per Check Manual; Section 4; OK for Service).As you can see this scenario knows no bounds and can get out of hand as far as leak rates; wear rates; service rates and even performance rates. The reason for Higher Checks is to fix the plane. That is why the limits are regarded as stricter; so that fly-on items can now get the attention they need and get repaired properly. Other great examples of this are Emergency Equipment Due Dates and so forth. I believe this type of action needs to stop and requires attention. I don't believe the AMTs are aware of what they are doing as they only following orders. I have made Management aware of this a year or so ago and have seen this action continuing. [Recommend] keeping a Check 'Open' until all items generated against the Check are satisfied by being fixed or deferred; but not transferred for statistical reasons.




Synopsis: An Aircraft Maintenance Technician (AMT) describes his work environment where Station Maintenance Management continually request that AMTs transfer maintenance discrepancy items from a B-Check (Higher Check) to a Lower Check; or even to a no check required status; to meet Operation schedules.