Date: 201602
Local time of day: 1201-1800
Location: PCT.TRACON, VA
Light: Daylight
Aircraft: Large Transport; Low Wing; 2 Turbojet Eng
Operator: Air Carrier
Operating under: Part 121
Flight plan: IFR
Mission: Passenger
Flight phase: Climb
Airspace: Class E ZDC
ATC / advisory: TRACON PCT
Second aircraft: Large Transport; Low Wing; 2 Turbojet Eng
Reporter organization: Government
Reporter function: Departure; Instructor
Reporter qualification: Air Traffic Control Fully Certified
Human factors: Confusion; Situational Awareness; Training / Qualification; Communication Breakdown
Anomaly: ATC Issue All Types; Conflict Airborne Conflict; Deviation - Speed All Types; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Published Material / Policy; Deviation / Discrepancy - Procedural Clearance
Detector: Person Air Traffic Control
When detected: In-flight
Result: Air Traffic Control Provided Assistance; Air Traffic Control Issued New Clearance
Contributing factors: Procedure; Human Factors
Primary problem: Procedure

Narrative: The Wooly sector of the Chesapeake (CHP) area of PCT handed off a number of TERPZ departures to the Fluky sector. Aircraft X was leading/ahead of Aircraft Y on the TERPZ departure. Initial separation when Fluky accepted the hand off was about 8 miles with Aircraft Y about 10 kts faster. When Aircraft Y got to 170 MSL; still in WOOLY's airspace; the overtake of Aircraft Y on Aircraft X was around 80 kts with minimal separation longitudinally. I instructed my trainee to turn Aircraft X westbound and increase to maximum forward speed and to then turn Aircraft Y southbound on a 210 heading. I'm not sure if separation was lost. I am sure after confronting the WOOLY controller in the breakroom about the overtake situation; he said he was not at fault; that the aircraft were 'separated when I shipped them' and that he no longer had any responsibility for the above mentioned aircraft. He was adamant that he did nothing wrong; and was rather smug in response to my questioning his action or inaction.I'm close to retiring and I'll admit it's been a while since I've sat down and read the .65; but I'm pretty sure a transferring controller is required to resolve all and any conflicts before an aircraft leaves his or her airspace. If this requirement has changed and no longer in effect please disregard this report. However; in my opinion; this action by the controller borders on negligence. My recommendation is that the controller and others like him; understand that all conflicts between aircraft need to be resolved before they leave your sector. Coordinate; amend an altitude; give a speed or a vector; anything to make sure we have separation. To smugly say you did your job and that you; in effect; are not concerned about a potential conflict; is not the FAA I grew up in. He might as well told me to 'go eat s#@%; it's your problem'. That's pretty much what I deciphered from his comment.




Synopsis: PCT Controller reported of a loss of separation resulting from a speed overtake. Controller was also training at the time and attempted to have the Developmental fix the situation. Reporter then confronted the transferring Controller who said it was not his fault and that the aircraft were separated when he shipped them.