delen/vistext huggingface dataset:
Chart description: 2008-2020 available apps trend is a consistent upward slope and it accelerated more after around 2012s. The highest growth happened between 2014-2016 where a million new apps appeared. 2020 has the highest number of apps, over three million.

Chart data: Year Apps Jun 30, 2008 49538 Jun 30, 2009 71707 Jun 30, 2010 153573 Jun 30, 2011 281298 Jun 30, 2012 452974 Jun 30, 2013 715364 Jun 30, 2014 958048 Jun 30, 2015 1404576 Jun 30, 2016 1975112 Jun 30, 2017 2338835 Jun 30, 2018 2450223 Jun 30, 2019 3062241 Jun 30, 2020 3420161

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"view": {"stroke": "transparent"}, "background": "transparent", "font": "Segoe UI", "header": {"titleFont": "wf_standard-font, helvetica, arial, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 16, "titleColor": "#252423", "labelFont": "Segoe UI", "labelFontSize": 13.333333333333332, "labelColor": "#605E5C"}, "axis": {"ticks": false, "grid": false, "domain": false, "labelColor": "#605E5C", "labelFontSize": 12, "titleFont": "wf_standard-font, helvetica, arial, sans-serif", "titleColor": "#252423", "titleFontSize": 16, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisQuantitative": {"tickCount": 3, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#C8C6C4", "gridDash": [1, 5], "labelFlush": false}, "axisBand": {"tickExtra": true}, "axisX": {"labelPadding": 5}, "axisY": {"labelPadding": 10}, "bar": {"fill": "#118DFF"}, "line": {"stroke": "#118DFF", "strokeWidth": 3, "strokeCap": "round", "strokeJoin": "round"}, "text": {"font": "Segoe UI", "fontSize": 12, "fill": "#605E5C"}, "area": {"fill": "#118DFF", "line": true, "opacity": 0.6}, "rect": {"fill": "#118DFF"}, "point": {"fill": "#118DFF", "filled": true, "size": 75}, "legend": {"titleFont": "Segoe UI", "titleFontWeight": "bold", "titleColor": "#605E5C", "labelFont": "Segoe UI", "labelFontSize": 13.333333333333332, "labelColor": "#605E5C", "symbolType": "circle", "symbolSize": 75}, "range": {"category": ["#118DFF", "#12239E", "#E66C37", "#6B007B", "#E044A7", "#744EC2", "#D9B300", "#D64550"], "diverging": ["#DEEFFF", "#118DFF"], "heatmap": ["#DEEFFF", "#118DFF"], "ordinal": ["#DEEFFF", "#c7e4ff", "#b0d9ff", "#9aceff", "#83c3ff", "#6cb9ff", "#55aeff", "#3fa3ff", "#2898ff", "#118DFF"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/192.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#12239E"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -45}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": -30, "title": "Apps"}, "field": "Apps"}}, "title": ["Number of available apps in the Apple App", "Store from 2008 to 2020"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: The number of apps has increased steadily over the period. The largest increases have taken place from mid 2014 onwards. Growth slowed slightly during 2017/18 but increased again thereafter.

Chart data: Year Games Jun 30, 2008 44678 Jun 30, 2009 50410 Jun 30, 2010 65729 Jun 30, 2011 89499 Jun 30, 2012 118993 Jun 30, 2013 162548 Jun 30, 2014 223988 Jun 30, 2015 396094 Jun 30, 2016 631091 Jun 30, 2017 783269 Jun 30, 2018 811911 Jun 30, 2019 903489 Jun 30, 2020 957390

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#666", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#fbb4ae", "#b3cde3", "#ccebc5", "#decbe4", "#fed9a6", "#ffffcc", "#e5d8bd", "#fddaec", "#f2f2f2", "#b3e2cd", "#fdcdac", "#cbd5e8", "#f4cae4", "#e6f5c9", "#fff2ae", "#f1e2cc", "#cccccc"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/192.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#fed9a6"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": 60, "title": "Games"}, "field": "Games"}}, "title": ["Number of available apps in the Apple App", "Store from 2008 to 2020"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Adidas and Nike have the greatest penetration in Turkey. They have a significantly greater share than the other brands shown. A selection of other well known brands have smaller levels. Some well known brands appear to have no uptake at all. With the exception of Adidas and Nike all the other brands fall in the category of <0.2.

Chart data: 2012 Brand 0.56 Adidas 0.53 Nike 0.1 Lescon 0.15 Puma 0.01 Champion 0.09 Reebok 0.13 Converse 0.06 Timberland 0.01 Fila 0.01 Kappa 0.01 Diadora 0.01 Fred Perry 0 Asics 0.01 K-Swiss 0 Speedo 0.01 Abercrombie 0 Le Coq Sportif 0 Umbro

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"view": {"stroke": "transparent"}, "background": "transparent", "font": "Segoe UI", "header": {"titleFont": "wf_standard-font, helvetica, arial, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 16, "titleColor": "#252423", "labelFont": "Segoe UI", "labelFontSize": 13.333333333333332, "labelColor": "#605E5C"}, "axis": {"ticks": false, "grid": false, "domain": false, "labelColor": "#605E5C", "labelFontSize": 12, "titleFont": "wf_standard-font, helvetica, arial, sans-serif", "titleColor": "#252423", "titleFontSize": 16, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisQuantitative": {"tickCount": 3, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#C8C6C4", "gridDash": [1, 5], "labelFlush": false}, "axisBand": {"tickExtra": true}, "axisX": {"labelPadding": 5}, "axisY": {"labelPadding": 10}, "bar": {"fill": "#118DFF"}, "line": {"stroke": "#118DFF", "strokeWidth": 3, "strokeCap": "round", "strokeJoin": "round"}, "text": {"font": "Segoe UI", "fontSize": 12, "fill": "#605E5C"}, "area": {"fill": "#118DFF", "line": true, "opacity": 0.6}, "rect": {"fill": "#118DFF"}, "point": {"fill": "#118DFF", "filled": true, "size": 75}, "legend": {"titleFont": "Segoe UI", "titleFontWeight": "bold", "titleColor": "#605E5C", "labelFont": "Segoe UI", "labelFontSize": 13.333333333333332, "labelColor": "#605E5C", "symbolType": "circle", "symbolSize": 75}, "range": {"category": ["#118DFF", "#12239E", "#E66C37", "#6B007B", "#E044A7", "#744EC2", "#D9B300", "#D64550"], "diverging": ["#DEEFFF", "#118DFF"], "heatmap": ["#DEEFFF", "#118DFF"], "ordinal": ["#DEEFFF", "#c7e4ff", "#b0d9ff", "#9aceff", "#83c3ff", "#6cb9ff", "#55aeff", "#3fa3ff", "#2898ff", "#118DFF"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1934.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#D64550"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "2012"}, "field": "2012"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -60}, "bin": false, "field": "Brand"}}, "title": ["Average penetration rate of sportswear brands", "in Turkey in 2012 and 2013"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Adidas had the biggest penetration rate at just under 0.50. Nike had the second largest penetration rate at just above 0.20. K-Swiss had a 0.0 penetration rate. Diadora, Fila, Fred Perry and Kappa had the same penetration rate at just above 0.0.

Chart data: Brand 2013 Adida  0.48; Brand: Adidas Nik  0.24; Brand: Nike Lesco  0.11; Brand: Lescon Pum  0.1; Brand: Puma Champio  0.09; Brand: Champion Reebo  0.05; Brand: Reebok Convers  0.05; Brand: Converse Timberlan  0.02; Brand: Timberland Fil  0.01; Brand: Fila Kapp  0.01; Brand: Kappa Diador  0.01; Brand: Diadora Fred Perr  0.01; Brand: Fred Perry Asic  0; Brand: Asics K-Swis  0; Brand: K-Swiss Speed  0; Brand: Speedo Abercrombi  0; Brand: Abercrombie Le Coq Sporti  0; Brand: Le Coq Sportif Umbr  0; Brand: Umbro

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"view": {"fill": "#e5e5e5"}, "area": {"fill": "#000"}, "line": {"stroke": "#000"}, "rect": {"fill": "#000"}, "bar": {"fill": "#000"}, "point": {"color": "#000", "size": 40}, "axis": {"domain": false, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#FFFFFF", "gridOpacity": 1, "labelColor": "#7F7F7F", "labelPadding": 4, "tickColor": "#7F7F7F", "tickSize": 5.67, "titleFontSize": 16, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 40}, "range": {"category": ["#000000", "#7F7F7F", "#1A1A1A", "#999999", "#333333", "#B0B0B0", "#4D4D4D", "#C9C9C9", "#666666", "#DCDCDC"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1934.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#B0B0B0"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Brand"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "2013"}, "field": "2013"}}, "title": ["Average penetration rate of sportswear brands", "in Turkey in 2012 and 2013"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: The penetration of sportswear in Turkey varies per brand in the 2012 and 2013 years. The Adidas brand is consistently penetrated more than the other brands showing .475 percent. Nike has the 2nd highest penetration rate at .240 percent. Abercrombie, Asics, K Swiss, Le Coq Sportif, Speedo and Umbro all show zero penetration.  All other brands mentioned, penetrate at .01 to .12 percent.

Chart data: Brand 2013 Adida  0.48; Brand: Adidas Nik  0.24; Brand: Nike Lesco  0.11; Brand: Lescon Pum  0.1; Brand: Puma Champio  0.09; Brand: Champion Reebo  0.05; Brand: Reebok Convers  0.05; Brand: Converse Timberlan  0.02; Brand: Timberland Fil  0.01; Brand: Fila Kapp  0.01; Brand: Kappa Diador  0.01; Brand: Diadora Fred Perr  0.01; Brand: Fred Perry Asic  0; Brand: Asics K-Swis  0; Brand: K-Swiss Speed  0; Brand: Speedo Abercrombi  0; Brand: Abercrombie Le Coq Sporti  0; Brand: Le Coq Sportif Umbr  0; Brand: Umbro

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"view": {"fill": "#e5e5e5"}, "area": {"fill": "#000"}, "line": {"stroke": "#000"}, "rect": {"fill": "#000"}, "bar": {"fill": "#000"}, "point": {"color": "#000", "size": 40}, "axis": {"domain": false, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#FFFFFF", "gridOpacity": 1, "labelColor": "#7F7F7F", "labelPadding": 4, "tickColor": "#7F7F7F", "tickSize": 5.67, "titleFontSize": 16, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 40}, "range": {"category": ["#000000", "#7F7F7F", "#1A1A1A", "#999999", "#333333", "#B0B0B0", "#4D4D4D", "#C9C9C9", "#666666", "#DCDCDC"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1934.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#B0B0B0"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Brand"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "2013"}, "field": "2013"}}, "title": ["Average penetration rate of sportswear brands", "in Turkey in 2012 and 2013"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Addidas and Nike, which are probably the most well known, appear to have the highest penetration rate.

Chart data: Brand 2013 Adida  0.48; Brand: Adidas Nik  0.24; Brand: Nike Lesco  0.11; Brand: Lescon Pum  0.1; Brand: Puma Champio  0.09; Brand: Champion Reebo  0.05; Brand: Reebok Convers  0.05; Brand: Converse Timberlan  0.02; Brand: Timberland Fil  0.01; Brand: Fila Kapp  0.01; Brand: Kappa Diador  0.01; Brand: Diadora Fred Perr  0.01; Brand: Fred Perry Asic  0; Brand: Asics K-Swis  0; Brand: K-Swiss Speed  0; Brand: Speedo Abercrombi  0; Brand: Abercrombie Le Coq Sporti  0; Brand: Le Coq Sportif Umbr  0; Brand: Umbro

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"view": {"fill": "#e5e5e5"}, "area": {"fill": "#000"}, "line": {"stroke": "#000"}, "rect": {"fill": "#000"}, "bar": {"fill": "#000"}, "point": {"color": "#000", "size": 40}, "axis": {"domain": false, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#FFFFFF", "gridOpacity": 1, "labelColor": "#7F7F7F", "labelPadding": 4, "tickColor": "#7F7F7F", "tickSize": 5.67, "titleFontSize": 16, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 40}, "range": {"category": ["#000000", "#7F7F7F", "#1A1A1A", "#999999", "#333333", "#B0B0B0", "#4D4D4D", "#C9C9C9", "#666666", "#DCDCDC"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1934.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#B0B0B0"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Brand"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "2013"}, "field": "2013"}}, "title": ["Average penetration rate of sportswear brands", "in Turkey in 2012 and 2013"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: The number of white underegraduate students declined slightly between 1990 and 2000.  From 2000, there was significant growth until 2010, since when the number of enrollments has dropped to the 1984 level.

Chart data: Year White Dec 31, 1975 7740.5 Dec 31, 1979 8480.7 Dec 31, 1989 9272.6 Dec 31, 1999 8983.5 Dec 31, 2009 10895.9 Dec 31, 2012 9898.1 Dec 31, 2013 9582.5 Dec 31, 2014 9303.8 Dec 31, 2015 9085.6 Dec 31, 2016 8882.8 Dec 31, 2017 8664.5

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#f9f9f9", "area": {"fill": "#ab5787"}, "line": {"stroke": "#ab5787"}, "rect": {"fill": "#ab5787"}, "bar": {"fill": "#ab5787"}, "point": {"fill": "#ab5787", "size": 30}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#979797", "domainWidth": 0.5, "gridWidth": 0.2, "labelColor": "#979797", "tickColor": "#979797", "tickWidth": 0.2, "titleColor": "#979797"}, "axisBand": {"grid": false}, "axisX": {"grid": true, "tickSize": 10}, "axisY": {"domain": false, "grid": true, "tickSize": 0}, "legend": {"labelFontSize": 11, "padding": 1, "symbolSize": 30, "symbolType": "square"}, "range": {"category": ["#ab5787", "#51b2e5", "#703c5c", "#168dd9", "#d190b6", "#00609f", "#d365ba", "#154866", "#666666", "#c4c4c4"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1938.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#d365ba"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": 30, "title": "White"}, "field": "White"}}, "title": ["Number of undergraduate students enrolled", "in the United States from 1976 to 2018 ,", "by ethnicity (in 1,000s)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: The number of Hispanic students has risen since 1980. It rose sharply from 2000.

Chart data: Year Hispanic Dec 31, 1975 352.9 Dec 31, 1979 433.1 Dec 31, 1989 724.6 Dec 31, 1999 1351 Dec 31, 2009 2551 Dec 31, 2012 2872.2 Dec 31, 2013 2962.4 Dec 31, 2014 3055 Dec 31, 2015 3168.3 Dec 31, 2016 3270.6 Dec 31, 2017 3352.7

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"area": {"fill": "#3366CC"}, "rect": {"fill": "#3366CC"}, "bar": {"fill": "#3366CC"}, "point": {"stroke": "#3366CC"}, "circle": {"fill": "#3366CC"}, "background": "#fff", "padding": {"top": 10, "right": 10, "bottom": 10, "left": 10}, "style": {"guide-label": {"font": "Arial, sans-serif", "fontSize": 12}, "guide-title": {"font": "Arial, sans-serif", "fontSize": 12}, "group-title": {"font": "Arial, sans-serif", "fontSize": 12}}, "title": {"font": "Arial, sans-serif", "fontSize": 14, "fontWeight": "bold", "dy": -3, "anchor": "start"}, "axis": {"gridColor": "#ccc", "tickColor": "#ccc", "domain": false, "grid": true}, "range": {"category": ["#4285F4", "#DB4437", "#F4B400", "#0F9D58", "#AB47BC", "#00ACC1", "#FF7043", "#9E9D24", "#5C6BC0", "#F06292", "#00796B", "#C2185B"], "heatmap": ["#c6dafc", "#5e97f6", "#2a56c6"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1938.tsv"}, "mark": "line", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#00ACC1"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -30}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": 0, "title": "Hispanic"}, "field": "Hispanic"}}, "title": ["Number of undergraduate students enrolled", "in the United States from 1976 to 2018 ,", "by ethnicity (in 1,000s)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: The number of non resident undergraduates between 1978 and 2016 is on an upwards trend with a sharp increase from 1990 onwards.

Chart data: Year Nonresident alien Dec 31, 1975 143.2 Dec 31, 1979 209.9 Dec 31, 1989 218.7 Dec 31, 1999 288 Dec 31, 2009 398.4 Dec 31, 2012 483.6 Dec 31, 2013 529.3 Dec 31, 2014 565.1 Dec 31, 2015 570.2 Dec 31, 2016 574.1 Dec 31, 2017 566.6

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#000", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#7fc97f", "#beaed4", "#fdc086", "#ffff99", "#386cb0", "#f0027f", "#bf5b17", "#666666"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1938.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#fdc086"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -30}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": -45, "title": "Nonresident alien"}, "field": "Nonresident alien"}}, "title": ["Number of undergraduate students enrolled", "in the United States from 1976 to 2018 ,", "by ethnicity (in 1,000s)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Agriculture fell in 2015 and 2018. At its peak, agriculture was at 0.015.

Chart data: Year Agriculture Dec 31, 2009 0.011 Dec 31, 2010 0.0123 Dec 31, 2011 0.0133 Dec 31, 2012 0.0159 Dec 31, 2013 0.0143 Dec 31, 2014 0.0105 Dec 31, 2015 0.0103 Dec 31, 2016 0.0139 Dec 31, 2017 0.0105 Dec 31, 2018 0.0101 Dec 31, 2019 0.0099

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#000", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#7fc97f", "#beaed4", "#fdc086", "#ffff99", "#386cb0", "#f0027f", "#bf5b17", "#666666"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1941.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#f0027f"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -90}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": -30, "title": "Agriculture"}, "field": "Agriculture"}}, "title": ["Luxembourg : Distribution of employment", "by economic sector from 2010 to 2020"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: There is a steady decline in the age structure of 0-14 year olds from 2010 to 2018. No increase  has been observerd across the period. The ratio dipped below 0.2 around 2015 with no signs of improving.

Chart data: Year 0-14 years Dec 31, 2008 0.207 Dec 31, 2009 0.2045 Dec 31, 2010 0.205 Dec 31, 2011 0.204 Dec 31, 2012 0.2026 Dec 31, 2013 0.201 Dec 31, 2014 0.1997 Dec 31, 2015 0.1981 Dec 31, 2016 0.1972 Dec 31, 2017 0.1965 Dec 31, 2018 0.1957

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"view": {"stroke": "transparent"}, "background": "transparent", "font": "Segoe UI", "header": {"titleFont": "wf_standard-font, helvetica, arial, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 16, "titleColor": "#252423", "labelFont": "Segoe UI", "labelFontSize": 13.333333333333332, "labelColor": "#605E5C"}, "axis": {"ticks": false, "grid": false, "domain": false, "labelColor": "#605E5C", "labelFontSize": 12, "titleFont": "wf_standard-font, helvetica, arial, sans-serif", "titleColor": "#252423", "titleFontSize": 16, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisQuantitative": {"tickCount": 3, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#C8C6C4", "gridDash": [1, 5], "labelFlush": false}, "axisBand": {"tickExtra": true}, "axisX": {"labelPadding": 5}, "axisY": {"labelPadding": 10}, "bar": {"fill": "#118DFF"}, "line": {"stroke": "#118DFF", "strokeWidth": 3, "strokeCap": "round", "strokeJoin": "round"}, "text": {"font": "Segoe UI", "fontSize": 12, "fill": "#605E5C"}, "area": {"fill": "#118DFF", "line": true, "opacity": 0.6}, "rect": {"fill": "#118DFF"}, "point": {"fill": "#118DFF", "filled": true, "size": 75}, "legend": {"titleFont": "Segoe UI", "titleFontWeight": "bold", "titleColor": "#605E5C", "labelFont": "Segoe UI", "labelFontSize": 13.333333333333332, "labelColor": "#605E5C", "symbolType": "circle", "symbolSize": 75}, "range": {"category": ["#118DFF", "#12239E", "#E66C37", "#6B007B", "#E044A7", "#744EC2", "#D9B300", "#D64550"], "diverging": ["#DEEFFF", "#118DFF"], "heatmap": ["#DEEFFF", "#118DFF"], "ordinal": ["#DEEFFF", "#c7e4ff", "#b0d9ff", "#9aceff", "#83c3ff", "#6cb9ff", "#55aeff", "#3fa3ff", "#2898ff", "#118DFF"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1952.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#6B007B"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {"labelAngle": 60}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "0-14 years"}, "field": "0-14 years"}}, "title": ["New Zealand : Age structure from 2009 to", "2019"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: In this linear scare which dates from 2010 through to 2019 you can see the slight decrease in the year  from 2016, the area is in New Zealand for children ages 0-14 years old.

Chart data: Year 0-14 years Dec 31, 2008 0.207 Dec 31, 2009 0.2045 Dec 31, 2010 0.205 Dec 31, 2011 0.204 Dec 31, 2012 0.2026 Dec 31, 2013 0.201 Dec 31, 2014 0.1997 Dec 31, 2015 0.1981 Dec 31, 2016 0.1972 Dec 31, 2017 0.1965 Dec 31, 2018 0.1957

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"view": {"stroke": "transparent"}, "background": "transparent", "font": "Segoe UI", "header": {"titleFont": "wf_standard-font, helvetica, arial, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 16, "titleColor": "#252423", "labelFont": "Segoe UI", "labelFontSize": 13.333333333333332, "labelColor": "#605E5C"}, "axis": {"ticks": false, "grid": false, "domain": false, "labelColor": "#605E5C", "labelFontSize": 12, "titleFont": "wf_standard-font, helvetica, arial, sans-serif", "titleColor": "#252423", "titleFontSize": 16, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisQuantitative": {"tickCount": 3, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#C8C6C4", "gridDash": [1, 5], "labelFlush": false}, "axisBand": {"tickExtra": true}, "axisX": {"labelPadding": 5}, "axisY": {"labelPadding": 10}, "bar": {"fill": "#118DFF"}, "line": {"stroke": "#118DFF", "strokeWidth": 3, "strokeCap": "round", "strokeJoin": "round"}, "text": {"font": "Segoe UI", "fontSize": 12, "fill": "#605E5C"}, "area": {"fill": "#118DFF", "line": true, "opacity": 0.6}, "rect": {"fill": "#118DFF"}, "point": {"fill": "#118DFF", "filled": true, "size": 75}, "legend": {"titleFont": "Segoe UI", "titleFontWeight": "bold", "titleColor": "#605E5C", "labelFont": "Segoe UI", "labelFontSize": 13.333333333333332, "labelColor": "#605E5C", "symbolType": "circle", "symbolSize": 75}, "range": {"category": ["#118DFF", "#12239E", "#E66C37", "#6B007B", "#E044A7", "#744EC2", "#D9B300", "#D64550"], "diverging": ["#DEEFFF", "#118DFF"], "heatmap": ["#DEEFFF", "#118DFF"], "ordinal": ["#DEEFFF", "#c7e4ff", "#b0d9ff", "#9aceff", "#83c3ff", "#6cb9ff", "#55aeff", "#3fa3ff", "#2898ff", "#118DFF"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1952.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#6B007B"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {"labelAngle": 60}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "0-14 years"}, "field": "0-14 years"}}, "title": ["New Zealand : Age structure from 2009 to", "2019"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Q1 has on average the highest revenue. 2020 has on average the lowest revenue over the year. the lowest revenue recorded was Q3 2020 with under 2,000. The highest Q1 2020. most quarters get around 6,000 revenue.

Chart data: Parks, experiences and products Quarter 2580 Q4 2020 983 Q3 2020 5543 Q2 2020 7396 Q1 2020 6655 Q4 2019 6575 Q3 2019 6169 Q2 2019* 6824 Q1 2019 6136 Q3 2018 5903 Q2 2018 6527 Q1 2018

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"view": {"fill": "#e5e5e5"}, "area": {"fill": "#000"}, "line": {"stroke": "#000"}, "rect": {"fill": "#000"}, "bar": {"fill": "#000"}, "point": {"color": "#000", "size": 40}, "axis": {"domain": false, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#FFFFFF", "gridOpacity": 1, "labelColor": "#7F7F7F", "labelPadding": 4, "tickColor": "#7F7F7F", "tickSize": 5.67, "titleFontSize": 16, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 40}, "range": {"category": ["#000000", "#7F7F7F", "#1A1A1A", "#999999", "#333333", "#B0B0B0", "#4D4D4D", "#C9C9C9", "#666666", "#DCDCDC"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1953.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#7F7F7F"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": -60, "title": "Parks, experiences and products"}, "field": "Parks, experiences and products"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -30}, "bin": false, "field": "Quarter"}}, "title": ["Revenue of the Walt Disney Company from", "1st quarter 2018 to 4th quarter 2020 , by", "segment (in million U.S. dollars)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: The cloud application platform scored the highest.

Chart data: different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems 2011 Cloud Application platform services (aPaaS  0.35; different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems: Cloud Application platform services (aPaaS) Cloud ALM Services (almPaaS  0.12; different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems: Cloud ALM Services (almPaaS) Cloud BPM platform services (bpmPaaS  0.11; different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems: Cloud BPM platform services (bpmPaaS) Cloud Integration services (iPaaS  0.11; different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems: Cloud Integration services (iPaaS) Cloud Application Security Service  0.11; different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems: Cloud Application Security Services Cloud MFT Service  0.08; different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems: Cloud MFT Services Cloud Application Services Governanc  0.04; different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems: Cloud Application Services Governance Cloud Business Analytics Services (baPaaS  0.03; different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems: Cloud Business Analytics Services (baPaaS) Cloud MOM Service  0.02; different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems: Cloud MOM Services Cloud Database services (dbPaas  0.02; different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems: Cloud Database services (dbPaas) Cloud Horizontal Portal Services (Portal PaaS  0.01; different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems: Cloud Horizontal Portal Services (Portal PaaS)

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"area": {"fill": "#3366CC"}, "rect": {"fill": "#3366CC"}, "bar": {"fill": "#3366CC"}, "point": {"stroke": "#3366CC"}, "circle": {"fill": "#3366CC"}, "background": "#fff", "padding": {"top": 10, "right": 10, "bottom": 10, "left": 10}, "style": {"guide-label": {"font": "Arial, sans-serif", "fontSize": 12}, "guide-title": {"font": "Arial, sans-serif", "fontSize": 12}, "group-title": {"font": "Arial, sans-serif", "fontSize": 12}}, "title": {"font": "Arial, sans-serif", "fontSize": 14, "fontWeight": "bold", "dy": -3, "anchor": "start"}, "axis": {"gridColor": "#ccc", "tickColor": "#ccc", "domain": false, "grid": true}, "range": {"category": ["#4285F4", "#DB4437", "#F4B400", "#0F9D58", "#AB47BC", "#00ACC1", "#FF7043", "#9E9D24", "#5C6BC0", "#F06292", "#00796B", "#C2185B"], "heatmap": ["#c6dafc", "#5e97f6", "#2a56c6"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1956.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#AB47BC"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "2011"}, "field": "2011"}}, "title": ["Platform as a Service (PaaS) market share", "in 2011 and 2016 , by type of service"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Cloud application platform had the highest market share.

Chart data: different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems 2016* Cloud Application platform services (aPaaS) 0.35 Cloud ALM Services (almPaaS) 0.11 Cloud BPM platform services (bpmPaaS) 0.1 Cloud Integration services (iPaaS) 0.14 Cloud Application Security Services 0.09 Cloud MFT Services 0.06 Cloud Application Services Governance 0.03 Cloud Business Analytics Services (baPaaS) 0.04 Cloud MOM Services 0.02 Cloud Database services (dbPaas) 0.04 Cloud Horizontal Portal Services (Portal PaaS) 0.02

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#ffffff", "title": {"anchor": "start", "color": "#000000", "font": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "fontSize": 22, "fontWeight": "normal"}, "area": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "line": {"stroke": "#82c6df", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "bar": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "point": {"color": "#82c6df", "size": 30}, "axis": {"labelFont": "Benton Gothic, sans-serif", "labelFontSize": 11.5, "labelFontWeight": "normal", "titleFont": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 13, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisX": {"labelPadding": 4, "tickSize": 3}, "axisY": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "maxExtent": 45, "minExtent": 45, "tickSize": 2, "titleAlign": "left", "titleAngle": 0, "titleX": -45, "titleY": -11}, "legend": {"labelFont": "Benton Gothic, sans-serif", "labelFontSize": 11.5, "symbolType": "square", "titleFont": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 13, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "range": {"category": ["#ec8431", "#829eb1", "#c89d29", "#3580b1", "#adc839", "#ab7fb4"], "diverging": ["#e68a4f", "#f4bb6a", "#f9e39c", "#dadfe2", "#a6b7c6", "#849eae"], "heatmap": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"], "ordinal": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"], "ramp": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1956.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#ec8431"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "different Platform as a Service (PaaS) systems"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "2016*"}, "field": "2016*"}}, "title": ["Platform as a Service (PaaS) market share", "in 2011 and 2016 , by type of service"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Consistent foot traffic growth with time for all except one mall.

Chart data: shopping malls First week of March Natick Mall 0.115 King of Prussia −0.075 The Mall at Short Hills −0.214 Westfield San Fran Center −0.342 Westfield Seattle −0.238 Pallsades Center −0.165 Galleria Dallas −0.034 Aventura Mall −0.153 Woodfield Mall −0.087 Westfield Century City (LA) −0.115 Westfield Garden (NJ) −0.171

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"view": {"fill": "#e5e5e5"}, "area": {"fill": "#000"}, "line": {"stroke": "#000"}, "rect": {"fill": "#000"}, "bar": {"fill": "#000"}, "point": {"color": "#000", "size": 40}, "axis": {"domain": false, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#FFFFFF", "gridOpacity": 1, "labelColor": "#7F7F7F", "labelPadding": 4, "tickColor": "#7F7F7F", "tickSize": 5.67, "titleFontSize": 16, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 40}, "range": {"category": ["#000000", "#7F7F7F", "#1A1A1A", "#999999", "#333333", "#B0B0B0", "#4D4D4D", "#C9C9C9", "#666666", "#DCDCDC"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1968.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#666666"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -90}, "bin": false, "field": "shopping malls"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": 60, "title": "First week of March"}, "field": "First week of March"}}, "title": ["Year over year foot traffic growth of selected", "shopping malls during the coronavirus (COVID-19)", "outbreak in the United States in 2020"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: All of the shopping centres shown had negative growth because the figures are all below zero. Westfield San Francisco has the worst growth. Westfield Century City had the best. Shopping malls in LA seem to have performed better.

Chart data: shopping malls Second week of March Natick Mall −0.212 King of Prussia −0.344 The Mall at Short Hills −0.397 Westfield San Fran Center −0.465 Westfield Seattle −0.332 Pallsades Center −0.154 Galleria Dallas −0.366 Aventura Mall −0.262 Woodfield Mall −0.271 Westfield Century City (LA) −0.075 Westfield Garden (NJ) −0.363

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#ffffff", "title": {"anchor": "start", "color": "#000000", "font": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "fontSize": 22, "fontWeight": "normal"}, "area": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "line": {"stroke": "#82c6df", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "bar": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "point": {"color": "#82c6df", "size": 30}, "axis": {"labelFont": "Benton Gothic, sans-serif", "labelFontSize": 11.5, "labelFontWeight": "normal", "titleFont": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 13, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisX": {"labelPadding": 4, "tickSize": 3}, "axisY": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "maxExtent": 45, "minExtent": 45, "tickSize": 2, "titleAlign": "left", "titleAngle": 0, "titleX": -45, "titleY": -11}, "legend": {"labelFont": "Benton Gothic, sans-serif", "labelFontSize": 11.5, "symbolType": "square", "titleFont": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 13, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "range": {"category": ["#ec8431", "#829eb1", "#c89d29", "#3580b1", "#adc839", "#ab7fb4"], "diverging": ["#e68a4f", "#f4bb6a", "#f9e39c", "#dadfe2", "#a6b7c6", "#849eae"], "heatmap": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"], "ordinal": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"], "ramp": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1968.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#adc839"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "shopping malls"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": 60, "title": "Second week of March"}, "field": "Second week of March"}}, "title": ["Year over year foot traffic growth of selected", "shopping malls during the coronavirus (COVID-19)", "outbreak in the United States in 2020"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Apple is the online company which had the most revenue in 2017 at over $200 billion. The online company which had the least revenue is eBay. There are 7 online companies whose revenues were somewhere between $10 to $40 billion. Google's revenue was over $100 billion while Amazon's revenue was over $150 billion. Apple, Amazon and Google generated the most revenue.

Chart data: 2017 Platform 177.87 Amazon.com 229.23 Apple 109.65 Google 22.99 Alibaba 40.65 Facebook 21.9 Tencent 11.69 Netflix 13.09 PayPal 13.03 Baidu 9.57 eBay

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#fff", "area": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "line": {"stroke": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "bar": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "point": {"color": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 1.5, "size": 50}, "axis": {"bandPosition": 0.5, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#000000", "gridOpacity": 1, "gridWidth": 0.5, "labelPadding": 10, "tickSize": 5, "tickWidth": 0.5}, "axisBand": {"grid": false, "tickExtra": true}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 50, "symbolType": "square"}, "range": {"category": ["#4572a7", "#aa4643", "#8aa453", "#71598e", "#4598ae", "#d98445", "#94aace", "#d09393", "#b9cc98", "#a99cbc"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1971.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#d98445"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "2017"}, "field": "2017"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Platform"}}, "title": ["Leading online companies ranked by revenue", "from 2017 to 2019 (in billion U.S. dollars)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Apple and Amazon are far ahead of the crowd - in that order - with Google in third place, getting about half the revenue of Apple. Facebook is in 4th place, but with less than half of Google's revenue. The other companies make up the bottom 10% or so.

Chart data: 2017 Platform 177.87 Amazon.com 229.23 Apple 109.65 Google 22.99 Alibaba 40.65 Facebook 21.9 Tencent 11.69 Netflix 13.09 PayPal 13.03 Baidu 9.57 eBay

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#fff", "area": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "line": {"stroke": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "bar": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "point": {"color": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 1.5, "size": 50}, "axis": {"bandPosition": 0.5, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#000000", "gridOpacity": 1, "gridWidth": 0.5, "labelPadding": 10, "tickSize": 5, "tickWidth": 0.5}, "axisBand": {"grid": false, "tickExtra": true}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 50, "symbolType": "square"}, "range": {"category": ["#4572a7", "#aa4643", "#8aa453", "#71598e", "#4598ae", "#d98445", "#94aace", "#d09393", "#b9cc98", "#a99cbc"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1971.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#d98445"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "2017"}, "field": "2017"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Platform"}}, "title": ["Leading online companies ranked by revenue", "from 2017 to 2019 (in billion U.S. dollars)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Apple has the largest revenue, followed by Amazon, followed by Google. eBay has the lowest revenue. Amazon has a revenue of over $200 billion, whilst eBay has a revenue of around $10 billion.

Chart data: 2017 Platform 177.87 Amazon.com 229.23 Apple 109.65 Google 22.99 Alibaba 40.65 Facebook 21.9 Tencent 11.69 Netflix 13.09 PayPal 13.03 Baidu 9.57 eBay

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#fff", "area": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "line": {"stroke": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "bar": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "point": {"color": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 1.5, "size": 50}, "axis": {"bandPosition": 0.5, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#000000", "gridOpacity": 1, "gridWidth": 0.5, "labelPadding": 10, "tickSize": 5, "tickWidth": 0.5}, "axisBand": {"grid": false, "tickExtra": true}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 50, "symbolType": "square"}, "range": {"category": ["#4572a7", "#aa4643", "#8aa453", "#71598e", "#4598ae", "#d98445", "#94aace", "#d09393", "#b9cc98", "#a99cbc"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1971.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#d98445"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "2017"}, "field": "2017"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Platform"}}, "title": ["Leading online companies ranked by revenue", "from 2017 to 2019 (in billion U.S. dollars)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: In 2019 Amazon, closely followed by Apple have had the leading revenues. The lowest revenue has been for ebay.

Chart data: Platform 2019 Amazon.co  280.52; Platform: Amazon.com Appl  260.17; Platform: Apple Googl  160.74; Platform: Google Alibab  71.99; Platform: Alibaba Faceboo  70.7; Platform: Facebook Tencen  54.08; Platform: Tencent Netfli  20.16; Platform: Netflix PayPa  17.77; Platform: PayPal Baid  15.43; Platform: Baidu eBa  10.8; Platform: eBay

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#000", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#7fc97f", "#beaed4", "#fdc086", "#ffff99", "#386cb0", "#f0027f", "#bf5b17", "#666666"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1971.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#7fc97f"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Platform"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "2019"}, "field": "2019"}}, "title": ["Leading online companies ranked by revenue", "from 2017 to 2019 (in billion U.S. dollars)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: The company with the highest revenue from online sales between 2017 and 2019 was Amazon with over 270 billion U.S. dollars. In second place was Apple with over 250 U.S. dollars.

Chart data: Platform 2019 Amazon.co  280.52; Platform: Amazon.com Appl  260.17; Platform: Apple Googl  160.74; Platform: Google Alibab  71.99; Platform: Alibaba Faceboo  70.7; Platform: Facebook Tencen  54.08; Platform: Tencent Netfli  20.16; Platform: Netflix PayPa  17.77; Platform: PayPal Baid  15.43; Platform: Baidu eBa  10.8; Platform: eBay

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#000", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#7fc97f", "#beaed4", "#fdc086", "#ffff99", "#386cb0", "#f0027f", "#bf5b17", "#666666"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1971.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#7fc97f"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Platform"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "2019"}, "field": "2019"}}, "title": ["Leading online companies ranked by revenue", "from 2017 to 2019 (in billion U.S. dollars)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: here we can clearly see that Manitoba and Prince Edward Island took the majority of the votes with all the others falling behind.

Chart data: Christian Heritage Party province of Canada 0.002 Alberta 0.001 British Columbia 0.005 Manitoba 0.001 New Brunswick 0.001 Newfoundland and Labrador 0.001 Ontario 0.005 Prince Edward Island

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#666", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#fbb4ae", "#b3cde3", "#ccebc5", "#decbe4", "#fed9a6", "#ffffcc", "#e5d8bd", "#fddaec", "#f2f2f2", "#b3e2cd", "#fdcdac", "#cbd5e8", "#f4cae4", "#e6f5c9", "#fff2ae", "#f1e2cc", "#cccccc"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1979.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#fff2ae"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": 90, "title": "Christian Heritage Party"}, "field": "Christian Heritage Party"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "province of Canada"}}, "title": ["Preliminary share of total votes for each", "party in the Canadian federal election held", "on October 21 , 2019 (as of October 22 ,", "2019) , by province"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: The province of Nova Scotia had the largest share of votes for Independents. The province of Alberta had the smallest share of votes for Independents. In all provinces the total share of votes for Independents was extremely small - under 0.015%.

Chart data: Independent province of Canada 0.001 Alberta 0.009 British Columbia 0.002 Manitoba 0.007 New Brunswick 0.015 Nova Scotia 0.004 Ontario 0.002 Quebec 0.002 Saskatchewan

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#000", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#7fc97f", "#beaed4", "#fdc086", "#ffff99", "#386cb0", "#f0027f", "#bf5b17", "#666666"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1979.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#bf5b17"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": 30, "title": "Independent"}, "field": "Independent"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -30}, "bin": false, "field": "province of Canada"}}, "title": ["Preliminary share of total votes for each", "party in the Canadian federal election held", "on October 21 , 2019 (as of October 22 ,", "2019) , by province"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: All provinces have a minimum of 0.010 votes except one. Newfoundland and Labrador is below 0.005.

Chart data: province of Canada People's Party Alberta 0.022 British Columbia 0.017 Manitoba 0.017 New Brunswick 0.021 Newfoundland and Labrador 0.001 Northwest Territories 0.018 Nova Scotia 0.012 Ontario 0.016 Quebec 0.015 Saskatchewan 0.018 Yukon 0.014

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"range": {"category": ["#393b79", "#5254a3", "#6b6ecf", "#9c9ede", "#637939", "#8ca252", "#b5cf6b", "#cedb9c", "#8c6d31", "#bd9e39", "#e7ba52", "#e7cb94", "#843c39", "#ad494a", "#d6616b", "#e7969c", "#7b4173", "#a55194", "#ce6dbd", "#de9ed6"]}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1979.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#843c39"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -30}, "bin": false, "field": "province of Canada"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": -60, "title": "People's Party"}, "field": "People\\'s Party"}}, "title": ["Preliminary share of total votes for each", "party in the Canadian federal election held", "on October 21 , 2019 (as of October 22 ,", "2019) , by province"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: This chart shows that the water brand Hayat was the most used water bottle brand in Turkey in 2012, whereas Volvic, Pure LIfe, Desani and Buxton were the least popular.

Chart data: 2012 Brand 0.33 Erikli 0.48 Hayat 0.26 Pinar 0.18 Damla 0.09 Aytaç 0.1 Saka 0.2 Sirma 0.01 Güzelpinar 0 Pure Life 0.02 Abant 0.01 Aqua 0 NAYA 0.01 Aquafina 0 Buxton 0 Dasani 0.01 Evian 0.01 Perrier 0.02 SPA 0.01 Vittel 0 Volvic

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"area": {"fill": "#30a2da"}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#cbcbcb", "grid": true, "gridColor": "#cbcbcb", "gridWidth": 1, "labelColor": "#999", "labelFontSize": 10, "titleColor": "#333", "tickColor": "#cbcbcb", "tickSize": 10, "titleFontSize": 14, "titlePadding": 10, "labelPadding": 4}, "axisBand": {"grid": false}, "background": "#f0f0f0", "view": {"fill": "#f0f0f0"}, "legend": {"labelColor": "#333", "labelFontSize": 11, "padding": 1, "symbolSize": 30, "symbolType": "square", "titleColor": "#333", "titleFontSize": 14, "titlePadding": 10}, "line": {"stroke": "#30a2da", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#30a2da"}, "bar": {"binSpacing": 2, "fill": "#30a2da", "stroke": null}, "range": {"category": ["#30a2da", "#fc4f30", "#e5ae38", "#6d904f", "#8b8b8b", "#b96db8", "#ff9e27", "#56cc60", "#52d2ca", "#52689e", "#545454", "#9fe4f8"], "diverging": ["#cc0020", "#e77866", "#f6e7e1", "#d6e8ed", "#91bfd9", "#1d78b5"], "heatmap": ["#d6e8ed", "#cee0e5", "#91bfd9", "#549cc6", "#1d78b5"]}, "point": {"filled": true, "shape": "circle"}, "title": {"anchor": "start", "fontSize": 24, "fontWeight": 600, "offset": 20}}, "data": {"url": "multiColumn/data/1981.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#6d904f"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": 30, "title": "2012"}, "field": "2012"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Brand"}}, "title": ["Average penetration rate of bottled water", "brands in Turkey in 2012 and 2013"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}