delen/vistext huggingface dataset:
Chart description: From 2000 to 2016 the ticket price has been steadily going up apart from 2007-2010 where it stayed at £4. The lowest was in 2000 at £2.60 up to £6 in 2016.

Chart data: Year Ticket price in British pounds 2016 5.9 2015 5.8 2014 5.7 2013 5.5 2012* 5.3 2011 5 2010 4 2009 4 2008 4 2007 4 2006 3 2005 2.8 2004 3 2003 2.8 2002 2.7 2001 2.7 2000 2.6

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#333", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#1b9e77", "#d95f02", "#7570b3", "#e7298a", "#66a61e", "#e6ab02", "#a6761d", "#666666"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24124.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#d95f02"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Ticket price in British pounds"}, "field": "Ticket price in British pounds"}}, "title": ["Cash price of a single journey in zones", "1 - 4 on the London Underground from 2000", "to 2016 (in GBP)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Amazon had the most mobile visitors in September 2018, at over 60 million. Walmart had a little less, but still more than the other retailers shown. Coupons.com had the least amount of mobile visitors. Most retailers had 30 million or fewer mobile visitors.

Chart data: leading online retail properties Number of mobile-only visitors in millions Amazon 63 Walmart 54 eBay 43 Target 32 Groupon 30 Etsy 20 The Home Depot 20 Kohl's 18 Best Buy 17 Coupons.com 13

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#fff", "area": {"fill": "#3e5c69"}, "line": {"stroke": "#3e5c69"}, "rect": {"fill": "#3e5c69"}, "bar": {"fill": "#3e5c69"}, "point": {"color": "#3e5c69"}, "axis": {"domainWidth": 0.5, "grid": true, "labelPadding": 2, "tickSize": 5, "tickWidth": 0.5, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisBand": {"grid": false}, "axisX": {"gridWidth": 0.2}, "axisY": {"gridDash": [3], "gridWidth": 0.4}, "legend": {"labelFontSize": 11, "padding": 1, "symbolType": "square"}, "range": {"category": ["#3e5c69", "#6793a6", "#182429", "#0570b0", "#3690c0", "#74a9cf", "#a6bddb", "#e2ddf2"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24125.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#6793a6"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -90}, "bin": false, "field": "leading online retail properties"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Number of mobile-only visitors in millions"}, "field": "Number of mobile-only visitors in millions"}}, "title": ["Number of mobile-only visitors to leading", "online retail properties in the United States", "in September 2018 (in millions)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Overall, ExxonMobil's costs have increased from 2005 to 2015. The lowest cost year was 600 million dollars in 2005, whilst the highest was 1,200 in 2015. In 2010there was a peak at 1,050, that fell back into the trend rate in 2014.

Chart data: Year Costs in million U.S. dollars Dec 31, 2000 603 Dec 31, 2001 631 Dec 31, 2002 618 Dec 31, 2003 649 Dec 31, 2004 712 Dec 31, 2005 733 Dec 31, 2006 814 Dec 31, 2007 847 Dec 31, 2008 1050 Dec 31, 2009 1012 Dec 31, 2010 1044 Dec 31, 2011 1042 Dec 31, 2012 1044 Dec 31, 2013 971 Dec 31, 2014 1008 Dec 31, 2015 1058 Dec 31, 2016 1063 Dec 31, 2017 1116 Dec 31, 2018 1214

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#ffffff", "title": {"anchor": "start", "color": "#000000", "font": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "fontSize": 22, "fontWeight": "normal"}, "area": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "line": {"stroke": "#82c6df", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "bar": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "point": {"color": "#82c6df", "size": 30}, "axis": {"labelFont": "Benton Gothic, sans-serif", "labelFontSize": 11.5, "labelFontWeight": "normal", "titleFont": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 13, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisX": {"labelPadding": 4, "tickSize": 3}, "axisY": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "maxExtent": 45, "minExtent": 45, "tickSize": 2, "titleAlign": "left", "titleAngle": 0, "titleX": -45, "titleY": -11}, "legend": {"labelFont": "Benton Gothic, sans-serif", "labelFontSize": 11.5, "symbolType": "square", "titleFont": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 13, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "range": {"category": ["#ec8431", "#829eb1", "#c89d29", "#3580b1", "#adc839", "#ab7fb4"], "diverging": ["#e68a4f", "#f4bb6a", "#f9e39c", "#dadfe2", "#a6b7c6", "#849eae"], "heatmap": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"], "ordinal": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"], "ramp": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/2412.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#ab7fb4"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Costs in million U.S. dollars"}, "field": "Costs in million U\\.S\\. dollars"}}, "title": ["ExxonMobil 's research and development costs", "from 2001 to 2019 (in million U.S. dollars)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: This chart shows the company’s costs have increased since 2001however inflation may have caused this. There were a slight dip in costs in 2012-2014 but since then it has increased again.

Chart data: Year Costs in million U.S. dollars Dec 31, 2000 603 Dec 31, 2001 631 Dec 31, 2002 618 Dec 31, 2003 649 Dec 31, 2004 712 Dec 31, 2005 733 Dec 31, 2006 814 Dec 31, 2007 847 Dec 31, 2008 1050 Dec 31, 2009 1012 Dec 31, 2010 1044 Dec 31, 2011 1042 Dec 31, 2012 1044 Dec 31, 2013 971 Dec 31, 2014 1008 Dec 31, 2015 1058 Dec 31, 2016 1063 Dec 31, 2017 1116 Dec 31, 2018 1214

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#ffffff", "title": {"anchor": "start", "color": "#000000", "font": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "fontSize": 22, "fontWeight": "normal"}, "area": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "line": {"stroke": "#82c6df", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "bar": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "point": {"color": "#82c6df", "size": 30}, "axis": {"labelFont": "Benton Gothic, sans-serif", "labelFontSize": 11.5, "labelFontWeight": "normal", "titleFont": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 13, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisX": {"labelPadding": 4, "tickSize": 3}, "axisY": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "maxExtent": 45, "minExtent": 45, "tickSize": 2, "titleAlign": "left", "titleAngle": 0, "titleX": -45, "titleY": -11}, "legend": {"labelFont": "Benton Gothic, sans-serif", "labelFontSize": 11.5, "symbolType": "square", "titleFont": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 13, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "range": {"category": ["#ec8431", "#829eb1", "#c89d29", "#3580b1", "#adc839", "#ab7fb4"], "diverging": ["#e68a4f", "#f4bb6a", "#f9e39c", "#dadfe2", "#a6b7c6", "#849eae"], "heatmap": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"], "ordinal": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"], "ramp": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/2412.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#ab7fb4"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Costs in million U.S. dollars"}, "field": "Costs in million U\\.S\\. dollars"}}, "title": ["ExxonMobil 's research and development costs", "from 2001 to 2019 (in million U.S. dollars)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Between 2001 to 2019 ExxonMobil's R&D costs have doubled. In 2007-2008 they made their biggest rise in cost rising by roughly 200 million dollars. It is still increasing year over year as it gets to 2019.

Chart data: Year Costs in million U.S. dollars Dec 31, 2000 603 Dec 31, 2001 631 Dec 31, 2002 618 Dec 31, 2003 649 Dec 31, 2004 712 Dec 31, 2005 733 Dec 31, 2006 814 Dec 31, 2007 847 Dec 31, 2008 1050 Dec 31, 2009 1012 Dec 31, 2010 1044 Dec 31, 2011 1042 Dec 31, 2012 1044 Dec 31, 2013 971 Dec 31, 2014 1008 Dec 31, 2015 1058 Dec 31, 2016 1063 Dec 31, 2017 1116 Dec 31, 2018 1214

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#ffffff", "title": {"anchor": "start", "color": "#000000", "font": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "fontSize": 22, "fontWeight": "normal"}, "area": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "line": {"stroke": "#82c6df", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "bar": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "point": {"color": "#82c6df", "size": 30}, "axis": {"labelFont": "Benton Gothic, sans-serif", "labelFontSize": 11.5, "labelFontWeight": "normal", "titleFont": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 13, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisX": {"labelPadding": 4, "tickSize": 3}, "axisY": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "maxExtent": 45, "minExtent": 45, "tickSize": 2, "titleAlign": "left", "titleAngle": 0, "titleX": -45, "titleY": -11}, "legend": {"labelFont": "Benton Gothic, sans-serif", "labelFontSize": 11.5, "symbolType": "square", "titleFont": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 13, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "range": {"category": ["#ec8431", "#829eb1", "#c89d29", "#3580b1", "#adc839", "#ab7fb4"], "diverging": ["#e68a4f", "#f4bb6a", "#f9e39c", "#dadfe2", "#a6b7c6", "#849eae"], "heatmap": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"], "ordinal": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"], "ramp": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/2412.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#ab7fb4"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Costs in million U.S. dollars"}, "field": "Costs in million U\\.S\\. dollars"}}, "title": ["ExxonMobil 's research and development costs", "from 2001 to 2019 (in million U.S. dollars)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: the highest value does not like any of them. Bitter is more popular than Pilsner surprisingly.

Chart data: Response Share of respondents Bitter 0.26 Pilsner 0.23 India Pale Ale (IPA) 0.22 Stout 0.19 Pale ale 0.19 Craft beer 0.16 Wheat beer 0.12 Amber ale 0.12 Fruit beer 0.09 Porter 0.08 Irish ale 0.08 Barley wine 0.04 Dunkel 0.03 Bock 0.03 Marzen 0.01 Helles 0.01 None of these 0.42 Don’t know 0.06

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#000", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#7fc97f", "#beaed4", "#fdc086", "#ffff99", "#386cb0", "#f0027f", "#bf5b17", "#666666"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24132.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#fdc086"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -45}, "bin": false, "field": "Response"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Share of respondents"}, "field": "Share of respondents"}}, "title": ["Which of the following types of beer do", "you like ?"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: It is showing a deficit in the budget balance for Kenya every year from 2015 to 2025, although this must be predicted from now till 2025.

Chart data: Year Budget balance in relation to GDP 2025* −0.07 2024* −0.072 2023* −0.0755 2022* −0.0795 2021* −0.0853 2020* −0.0839 2019 −0.0773 2018 −0.0738 2017 −0.0784 2016 −0.0847 2015 −0.0809

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#f9f9f9", "area": {"fill": "#ab5787"}, "line": {"stroke": "#ab5787"}, "rect": {"fill": "#ab5787"}, "bar": {"fill": "#ab5787"}, "point": {"fill": "#ab5787", "size": 30}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#979797", "domainWidth": 0.5, "gridWidth": 0.2, "labelColor": "#979797", "tickColor": "#979797", "tickWidth": 0.2, "titleColor": "#979797"}, "axisBand": {"grid": false}, "axisX": {"grid": true, "tickSize": 10}, "axisY": {"domain": false, "grid": true, "tickSize": 0}, "legend": {"labelFontSize": 11, "padding": 1, "symbolSize": 30, "symbolType": "square"}, "range": {"category": ["#ab5787", "#51b2e5", "#703c5c", "#168dd9", "#d190b6", "#00609f", "#d365ba", "#154866", "#666666", "#c4c4c4"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24147.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#154866"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -90}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": -60, "title": "Budget balance in relation to GDP"}, "field": "Budget balance in relation to GDP"}}, "title": ["Kenya : Budget balance between 2015 to 2025", "in relation to GDP"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Facebook is the dominating share leader in Apple iOS apps, followed by Messenger, YouTube, and Kindle.

Chart data: Penetration rate among iOS users Platform 0.6844 Facebook 0.4993 Messenger 0.4721 YouTube - Watch, Upload and Share Videos 0.4626 Kindle Read eBooks, Magazines & Textbooks 0.4367 BlockArt Free 0.4231 Instagram 0.3456 WhatsApp Messenger 0.3374 musical.ly - your video social network 0.3116 Snapchat 0.298 Twitter 0.2435 eBay for iPad 0.2367 eBay: Buy, Sell, Save! Electronics, Fashion & More 0.2163 Spotify Music 0.2041 Google Maps - Navigation & Transit 0.2014 Skype for iPhone 0.1823 Pinterest 0.1714 Shazam - Discover music, artists, videos & lyrics 0.1646 Netflix 0.1524 Google Search made just for mobile 0.1361 Viber Messenger

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#333", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#1b9e77", "#d95f02", "#7570b3", "#e7298a", "#66a61e", "#e6ab02", "#a6761d", "#666666"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24156.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#666666"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": 60, "title": "Penetration rate among iOS users"}, "field": "Penetration rate among iOS users"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Platform"}}, "title": ["Market reach of the most popular Apple iOS", "apps in the United Kingdom as of June 2017"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: The maximum number of close to 6000 cases of extortion in Belgium was recorded in 2012.

Chart data: Year Cases of extortion Dec 31, 2007 2259 Dec 31, 2008 2541 Dec 31, 2009 2720 Dec 31, 2010 2867 Dec 31, 2011 5688 Dec 31, 2012 3558 Dec 31, 2013 3296 Dec 31, 2014 3444 Dec 31, 2015 3334 Dec 31, 2016 3073 Dec 31, 2017 3648 Dec 31, 2018 3671

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"view": {"stroke": "transparent"}, "background": "transparent", "font": "Segoe UI", "header": {"titleFont": "wf_standard-font, helvetica, arial, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 16, "titleColor": "#252423", "labelFont": "Segoe UI", "labelFontSize": 13.333333333333332, "labelColor": "#605E5C"}, "axis": {"ticks": false, "grid": false, "domain": false, "labelColor": "#605E5C", "labelFontSize": 12, "titleFont": "wf_standard-font, helvetica, arial, sans-serif", "titleColor": "#252423", "titleFontSize": 16, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisQuantitative": {"tickCount": 3, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#C8C6C4", "gridDash": [1, 5], "labelFlush": false}, "axisBand": {"tickExtra": true}, "axisX": {"labelPadding": 5}, "axisY": {"labelPadding": 10}, "bar": {"fill": "#118DFF"}, "line": {"stroke": "#118DFF", "strokeWidth": 3, "strokeCap": "round", "strokeJoin": "round"}, "text": {"font": "Segoe UI", "fontSize": 12, "fill": "#605E5C"}, "area": {"fill": "#118DFF", "line": true, "opacity": 0.6}, "rect": {"fill": "#118DFF"}, "point": {"fill": "#118DFF", "filled": true, "size": 75}, "legend": {"titleFont": "Segoe UI", "titleFontWeight": "bold", "titleColor": "#605E5C", "labelFont": "Segoe UI", "labelFontSize": 13.333333333333332, "labelColor": "#605E5C", "symbolType": "circle", "symbolSize": 75}, "range": {"category": ["#118DFF", "#12239E", "#E66C37", "#6B007B", "#E044A7", "#744EC2", "#D9B300", "#D64550"], "diverging": ["#DEEFFF", "#118DFF"], "heatmap": ["#DEEFFF", "#118DFF"], "ordinal": ["#DEEFFF", "#c7e4ff", "#b0d9ff", "#9aceff", "#83c3ff", "#6cb9ff", "#55aeff", "#3fa3ff", "#2898ff", "#118DFF"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24158.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#D64550"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Cases of extortion"}, "field": "Cases of extortion"}}, "title": ["Registered cases of extortion in Belgium", "from 2008 to 2019"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: production has declined at a steady rate after reaching a peak in 2012.

Chart data: Year Cases of child pornography production Dec 31, 2007 17 Dec 31, 2008 25 Dec 31, 2009 14 Dec 31, 2010 17 Dec 31, 2011 20 Dec 31, 2012 31 Dec 31, 2013 16 Dec 31, 2014 25 Dec 31, 2015 15 Dec 31, 2016 11 Dec 31, 2017 11

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#666", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#fbb4ae", "#b3cde3", "#ccebc5", "#decbe4", "#fed9a6", "#ffffcc", "#e5d8bd", "#fddaec", "#f2f2f2", "#b3e2cd", "#fdcdac", "#cbd5e8", "#f4cae4", "#e6f5c9", "#fff2ae", "#f1e2cc", "#cccccc"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24159.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#fff2ae"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {"labelAngle": -60}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": 0, "title": "Cases of child pornography production"}, "field": "Cases of child pornography production"}}, "title": ["Registered cases of child pornography production", "in Belgium from 2008 to 2019"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: German players appear to have the most appearances.

Chart data: Number of appearances Soccer player 25 Lothar Matthäus (Germany) 24 Miroslav Klose (Germany) 23 Paolo Maldini (Italy) 21 Uwe Seeler (Germany) 21 Diege Maradona (Argentina) 21 Władysław Żmuda (Poland) 20 Cafu (Brazil) 20 Bastian Schweinsteiger (Germany) 20 Philipp Lahm (Germany) 20 Grzegorz Lato (Poland)

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#333", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#1b9e77", "#d95f02", "#7570b3", "#e7298a", "#66a61e", "#e6ab02", "#a6761d", "#666666"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/2415.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#66a61e"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Number of appearances"}, "field": "Number of appearances"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Soccer player"}}, "title": ["Soccer players with the most appearances", "at the FIFA World Cup from 1930 to 2018"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Since 2000 the number of births has been constantly going up over time.

Chart data: Number of births Year 142739 2019-2020* 140089 2018-2019 140985 2017-2018 140531 2016-2017 139924 2015-2016 139963 2014-2015 140171 2013-2014 140601 2012-2013 140999 2011-2012 139448 2010-2011 139771 2009-2010 140326 2008-2009 140547 2007-2008 136980 2006-2007 133775 2005-2006 132795 2004-2005 132873 2003-2004 129256 2002-2003 128946 2001-2002 127741 2000-2001

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#333", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#1b9e77", "#d95f02", "#7570b3", "#e7298a", "#66a61e", "#e6ab02", "#a6761d", "#666666"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24162.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#e6ab02"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Number of births"}, "field": "Number of births"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}}, "title": ["Number of births in Ontario , Canada from", "2001 to 2020"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Fines, penalties and forefits make up 4000 million dollars of revenue.

Chart data: source of revenue Revenues in million Canadian dollars Grants from general government units 4024 Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 3459 Taxes on goods and services 3238 Sales of goods and services 593 Social security contributions 320 Property income 277 Taxes on property 63 Miscellaneous revenue 59 Fines, penalties and forfeits 5 Voluntary transfers other than grants 2

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#666", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#fbb4ae", "#b3cde3", "#ccebc5", "#decbe4", "#fed9a6", "#ffffcc", "#e5d8bd", "#fddaec", "#f2f2f2", "#b3e2cd", "#fdcdac", "#cbd5e8", "#f4cae4", "#e6f5c9", "#fff2ae", "#f1e2cc", "#cccccc"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24163.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#decbe4"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "source of revenue"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Revenues in million Canadian dollars"}, "field": "Revenues in million Canadian dollars"}}, "title": ["Revenues of the Nova Scotia provincial government", "in 2019 , by source (in million Canadian", "dollars)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: British airways has nearly double the amount of usage than the Qantas.

Chart data: Share of respondents Response 0.61 British Airways 0.52 EasyJet 0.5 Emirates 0.47 Virgin Atlantic 0.44 TUI Airways 0.38 Jet2.com 0.34 Qatar Airways 0.34 Etihad Airways 0.31 Qantas 0.27 KLM

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#333", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#1b9e77", "#d95f02", "#7570b3", "#e7298a", "#66a61e", "#e6ab02", "#a6761d", "#666666"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24188.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#e6ab02"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Share of respondents"}, "field": "Share of respondents"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": 45}, "bin": false, "field": "Response"}}, "title": ["Most popular airlines among millennials", "in the United Kingdom (UK) as of October", "2019"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: British Airways is the most popular airline in October 2019, whereas KLM seems to be the least popular one. Easylet and Emirates are quite popular as only about 0.1 less than the British Airways. TUI Airways and Virgin Atlantic have average performance. Other than those companies, the rest of them have around 0.3 share of respondents.

Chart data: Share of respondents Response 0.61 British Airways 0.52 EasyJet 0.5 Emirates 0.47 Virgin Atlantic 0.44 TUI Airways 0.38 Jet2.com 0.34 Qatar Airways 0.34 Etihad Airways 0.31 Qantas 0.27 KLM

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#333", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#1b9e77", "#d95f02", "#7570b3", "#e7298a", "#66a61e", "#e6ab02", "#a6761d", "#666666"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24188.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#e6ab02"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Share of respondents"}, "field": "Share of respondents"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": 45}, "bin": false, "field": "Response"}}, "title": ["Most popular airlines among millennials", "in the United Kingdom (UK) as of October", "2019"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: All the named personalities have quite an even share of the respondents favouring them despite most respondents not providing an answer.

Chart data: Share of respondents Response 0.22 Simone Veil 0.05 Sophie Marceau 0.02 Brigitte Bardot 0.02 Catherine Deneuve 0.02 Marie Curie 0.02 Marion Cotillard 0.01 Christiane Taubira 0.01 Florence Foresti 0.01 Joan of Arc 0.01 Marine Le Pen 0.01 Mylène Farmer 0.01 Vanessa Paradis 0.25 Other 0.34 None / no answer

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#fff", "area": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "line": {"stroke": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "bar": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "point": {"color": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 1.5, "size": 50}, "axis": {"bandPosition": 0.5, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#000000", "gridOpacity": 1, "gridWidth": 0.5, "labelPadding": 10, "tickSize": 5, "tickWidth": 0.5}, "axisBand": {"grid": false, "tickExtra": true}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 50, "symbolType": "square"}, "range": {"category": ["#4572a7", "#aa4643", "#8aa453", "#71598e", "#4598ae", "#d98445", "#94aace", "#d09393", "#b9cc98", "#a99cbc"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24190.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#a99cbc"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Share of respondents"}, "field": "Share of respondents"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Response"}}, "title": ["Ranking of the preferred French female personalities", "in France in 2019"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: 10 women each had less than 0.03 share of responses. Simone Veil was the most popular woman. The most popular answer to the survey was 'none/no answer'.

Chart data: Share of respondents Response 0.22 Simone Veil 0.05 Sophie Marceau 0.02 Brigitte Bardot 0.02 Catherine Deneuve 0.02 Marie Curie 0.02 Marion Cotillard 0.01 Christiane Taubira 0.01 Florence Foresti 0.01 Joan of Arc 0.01 Marine Le Pen 0.01 Mylène Farmer 0.01 Vanessa Paradis 0.25 Other 0.34 None / no answer

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#fff", "area": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "line": {"stroke": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "bar": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "point": {"color": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 1.5, "size": 50}, "axis": {"bandPosition": 0.5, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#000000", "gridOpacity": 1, "gridWidth": 0.5, "labelPadding": 10, "tickSize": 5, "tickWidth": 0.5}, "axisBand": {"grid": false, "tickExtra": true}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 50, "symbolType": "square"}, "range": {"category": ["#4572a7", "#aa4643", "#8aa453", "#71598e", "#4598ae", "#d98445", "#94aace", "#d09393", "#b9cc98", "#a99cbc"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24190.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#a99cbc"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Share of respondents"}, "field": "Share of respondents"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Response"}}, "title": ["Ranking of the preferred French female personalities", "in France in 2019"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: In terms of the preferred female personalities, about one third of the responders stated none or did not answer and about a quarter of responders stated another personality without singling out a particular one (i.e., apart from the possible multiple choice options). Nevertheless, Simone Veil seems to be the the most preferred personality by a large margin, according to about one fifth of the responders, followed by Sophie Marceau preferred by only 5% of the responders, and the remaining 10 possible candidates ranging about 1-2%.

Chart data: Share of respondents Response 0.22 Simone Veil 0.05 Sophie Marceau 0.02 Brigitte Bardot 0.02 Catherine Deneuve 0.02 Marie Curie 0.02 Marion Cotillard 0.01 Christiane Taubira 0.01 Florence Foresti 0.01 Joan of Arc 0.01 Marine Le Pen 0.01 Mylène Farmer 0.01 Vanessa Paradis 0.25 Other 0.34 None / no answer

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#fff", "area": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "line": {"stroke": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "bar": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "point": {"color": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 1.5, "size": 50}, "axis": {"bandPosition": 0.5, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#000000", "gridOpacity": 1, "gridWidth": 0.5, "labelPadding": 10, "tickSize": 5, "tickWidth": 0.5}, "axisBand": {"grid": false, "tickExtra": true}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 50, "symbolType": "square"}, "range": {"category": ["#4572a7", "#aa4643", "#8aa453", "#71598e", "#4598ae", "#d98445", "#94aace", "#d09393", "#b9cc98", "#a99cbc"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24190.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#a99cbc"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Share of respondents"}, "field": "Share of respondents"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Response"}}, "title": ["Ranking of the preferred French female personalities", "in France in 2019"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: The femicide rate in Mexico is generally low but 3 states show much higher rates, Colima, Morelos and Veracruz.

Chart data: States with the highest femicide rate in Mexico Femicide rate Morelos 3.74 Veracruz 3.6 Colima 2.83 Sonora 2.42 Nuevo León 2.42 Sinaloa 2.35 Tabasco 2.09 San Luis Potosí 1.92 Quintana Roo 1.92 Puebla 1.71 Chihuahua 1.53 Coahuila 1.51 Mexico City 1.44 State of Mexico 1.38 Zacatecas 1.31

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"range": {"category": ["#4c78a8", "#9ecae9", "#f58518", "#ffbf79", "#54a24b", "#88d27a", "#b79a20", "#f2cf5b", "#439894", "#83bcb6", "#e45756", "#ff9d98", "#79706e", "#bab0ac", "#d67195", "#fcbfd2", "#b279a2", "#d6a5c9", "#9e765f", "#d8b5a5"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24197.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#54a24b"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": 90}, "bin": false, "field": "States with the highest femicide rate in Mexico"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": -60, "title": "Femicide rate"}, "field": "Femicide rate"}}, "title": ["States with the highest femicide rate in", "Mexico in 2019 (number of femicides per 100,000", "women)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: The chat shows that Morelos has the highest rate of femicide of Mexico states in 2019. The state of Zacatecas has the lowest rate of femicide which may indicate that it is a nicer place to live.

Chart data: States with the highest femicide rate in Mexico Femicide rate Morelos 3.74 Veracruz 3.6 Colima 2.83 Sonora 2.42 Nuevo León 2.42 Sinaloa 2.35 Tabasco 2.09 San Luis Potosí 1.92 Quintana Roo 1.92 Puebla 1.71 Chihuahua 1.53 Coahuila 1.51 Mexico City 1.44 State of Mexico 1.38 Zacatecas 1.31

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"range": {"category": ["#4c78a8", "#9ecae9", "#f58518", "#ffbf79", "#54a24b", "#88d27a", "#b79a20", "#f2cf5b", "#439894", "#83bcb6", "#e45756", "#ff9d98", "#79706e", "#bab0ac", "#d67195", "#fcbfd2", "#b279a2", "#d6a5c9", "#9e765f", "#d8b5a5"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24197.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#54a24b"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": 90}, "bin": false, "field": "States with the highest femicide rate in Mexico"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": -60, "title": "Femicide rate"}, "field": "Femicide rate"}}, "title": ["States with the highest femicide rate in", "Mexico in 2019 (number of femicides per 100,000", "women)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: 80% of states have between 1.5 and 2.5 deaths per 100k. The other 20% approach 3 per 100k and peak around 3.8k, suggestive of differing conditions in those 3 states as opposed to the Mexican mean.

Chart data: States with the highest femicide rate in Mexico Femicide rate Morelos 3.74 Veracruz 3.6 Colima 2.83 Sonora 2.42 Nuevo León 2.42 Sinaloa 2.35 Tabasco 2.09 San Luis Potosí 1.92 Quintana Roo 1.92 Puebla 1.71 Chihuahua 1.53 Coahuila 1.51 Mexico City 1.44 State of Mexico 1.38 Zacatecas 1.31

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"range": {"category": ["#4c78a8", "#9ecae9", "#f58518", "#ffbf79", "#54a24b", "#88d27a", "#b79a20", "#f2cf5b", "#439894", "#83bcb6", "#e45756", "#ff9d98", "#79706e", "#bab0ac", "#d67195", "#fcbfd2", "#b279a2", "#d6a5c9", "#9e765f", "#d8b5a5"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24197.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#54a24b"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": 90}, "bin": false, "field": "States with the highest femicide rate in Mexico"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": -60, "title": "Femicide rate"}, "field": "Femicide rate"}}, "title": ["States with the highest femicide rate in", "Mexico in 2019 (number of femicides per 100,000", "women)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: There is no pattern to be observed in this bar chart.

Chart data: Share of respondents Response 0.41 Children can develop interest in additional activities 0.23 We don't lack money for food, bills, clothes 0.19 We can save money, which was impossible earlier 0.18 We can afford more expensive products-we buy better products 0.16 We can afford a holiday, which was impossible eariler 0.12 We improved our living conditions (renovation, change of accommodation) 0.1 We can afford medicines, private healthcare, rehabilitation 0.03 We could pay off a loan earlier 0.03 The problems with paying installments ended 0.03 We could pay off debts to our family or friends 0.02 There was a possibility for parent/s to quit working 0.03 Other 0.28 I didn't notice any changes in the functioning of my household

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#fff", "area": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "line": {"stroke": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "bar": {"fill": "#4572a7"}, "point": {"color": "#4572a7", "strokeWidth": 1.5, "size": 50}, "axis": {"bandPosition": 0.5, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#000000", "gridOpacity": 1, "gridWidth": 0.5, "labelPadding": 10, "tickSize": 5, "tickWidth": 0.5}, "axisBand": {"grid": false, "tickExtra": true}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 50, "symbolType": "square"}, "range": {"category": ["#4572a7", "#aa4643", "#8aa453", "#71598e", "#4598ae", "#d98445", "#94aace", "#d09393", "#b9cc98", "#a99cbc"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24201.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#71598e"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": 45, "title": "Share of respondents"}, "field": "Share of respondents"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {"labelAngle": 45}, "bin": false, "field": "Response"}}, "title": ["Effects of the `` Family 500 plus '' program", "in Poland in 2019"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: CPI increased between 2019 and 2020. CPI grew at a steady rate.

Chart data: Month CPI non-food (Dec=2016) Dec 31, 2018 131.4 Jan 31, 2019 130.7 Feb 28, 2019 133.6 Mar 31, 2019 133.3 Apr 30, 2019 136.1 May 31, 2019 137.5 Jun 30, 2019 139.2 Jul 31, 2019 140.8 Aug 31, 2019 144.1 Sep 30, 2019 144.8 Oct 31, 2019 146.1 Nov 30, 2019 149.5 Dec 31, 2019 151 Jan 31, 2020 153.7 Feb 29, 2020 157.1 Mar 31, 2020 158.9 Apr 30, 2020 162.1

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"area": {"fill": "#30a2da"}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#cbcbcb", "grid": true, "gridColor": "#cbcbcb", "gridWidth": 1, "labelColor": "#999", "labelFontSize": 10, "titleColor": "#333", "tickColor": "#cbcbcb", "tickSize": 10, "titleFontSize": 14, "titlePadding": 10, "labelPadding": 4}, "axisBand": {"grid": false}, "background": "#f0f0f0", "view": {"fill": "#f0f0f0"}, "legend": {"labelColor": "#333", "labelFontSize": 11, "padding": 1, "symbolSize": 30, "symbolType": "square", "titleColor": "#333", "titleFontSize": 14, "titlePadding": 10}, "line": {"stroke": "#30a2da", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#30a2da"}, "bar": {"binSpacing": 2, "fill": "#30a2da", "stroke": null}, "range": {"category": ["#30a2da", "#fc4f30", "#e5ae38", "#6d904f", "#8b8b8b", "#b96db8", "#ff9e27", "#56cc60", "#52d2ca", "#52689e", "#545454", "#9fe4f8"], "diverging": ["#cc0020", "#e77866", "#f6e7e1", "#d6e8ed", "#91bfd9", "#1d78b5"], "heatmap": ["#d6e8ed", "#cee0e5", "#91bfd9", "#549cc6", "#1d78b5"]}, "point": {"filled": true, "shape": "circle"}, "title": {"anchor": "start", "fontSize": 24, "fontWeight": 600, "offset": 20}}, "data": {"url": "data/24206.tsv"}, "mark": "line", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#e5ae38"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Month"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": 60, "title": "CPI non-food (Dec=2016)"}, "field": "CPI non-food (Dec=2016)"}}, "title": ["Consumer price index for non-food in Ethiopia", "from 2019 to 2020"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: There was a steady increase in the production costs between 2007 and 2011. It has began to decrease after 2011 though.

Chart data: Year Production costs in cents per kilowatt hour Dec 31, 1999 2.37 Dec 31, 2000 2.43 Dec 31, 2001 2.4 Dec 31, 2002 2.37 Dec 31, 2003 2.46 Dec 31, 2004 2.67 Dec 31, 2005 2.78 Dec 31, 2006 2.83 Dec 31, 2007 3.09 Dec 31, 2008 3.27 Dec 31, 2009 3.36 Dec 31, 2010 3.46 Dec 31, 2011 3.4 Dec 31, 2012 3.29 Dec 31, 2013 3.29

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#666", "title": {"color": "#fff", "subtitleColor": "#fff"}, "style": {"guide-label": {"fill": "#fff"}, "guide-title": {"fill": "#fff"}}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#fff", "gridColor": "#888", "tickColor": "#fff"}, "range": {"category": ["#fbb4ae", "#b3cde3", "#ccebc5", "#decbe4", "#fed9a6", "#ffffcc", "#e5d8bd", "#fddaec", "#f2f2f2", "#b3e2cd", "#fdcdac", "#cbd5e8", "#f4cae4", "#e6f5c9", "#fff2ae", "#f1e2cc", "#cccccc"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24208.tsv"}, "mark": "line", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#fdcdac"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {"labelAngle": 45}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Production costs in cents per kilowatt hour"}, "field": "Production costs in cents per kilowatt hour"}}, "title": ["Cost of electricity produced from coal in", "the United States between 2000 and 2014 (in", "cents per kilowatt hour)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Ted williams has the highest amount of home runs whereas Rico Petrocelli has the least.

Chart data: Home run leader Number of home runs Ted Williams 521 David Ortiz 483 Carl Yastrzemski 452 Jim Rice 382 Dwight Evans 379 Manny Ramirez 274 Mo Vaughn 230 Bobby Doerr 223 Jimmie Foxx 222 Rico Petrocelli 210

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#fff", "area": {"fill": "#3e5c69"}, "line": {"stroke": "#3e5c69"}, "rect": {"fill": "#3e5c69"}, "bar": {"fill": "#3e5c69"}, "point": {"color": "#3e5c69"}, "axis": {"domainWidth": 0.5, "grid": true, "labelPadding": 2, "tickSize": 5, "tickWidth": 0.5, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisBand": {"grid": false}, "axisX": {"gridWidth": 0.2}, "axisY": {"gridDash": [3], "gridWidth": 0.4}, "legend": {"labelFontSize": 11, "padding": 1, "symbolType": "square"}, "range": {"category": ["#3e5c69", "#6793a6", "#182429", "#0570b0", "#3690c0", "#74a9cf", "#a6bddb", "#e2ddf2"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/2420.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#e2ddf2"}, "x": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Home run leader"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Number of home runs"}, "field": "Number of home runs"}}, "title": ["Boston Red Sox all-time home run leaders", "as of October 2020"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Over the period 1990 to 2011 the price has increased from almost 40 cents per litre to 120 cents per litre. This is an increase of 3x the 1990 price. These prices are the minimum and maximum prices during this period. The increase over this period appears to be accelerating.

Chart data: Year Price in Canadian cents per litre Dec 31, 1989 35.6 Dec 31, 1994 38.3 Dec 31, 1999 54.3 Dec 31, 2000 55.9 Dec 31, 2001 50.8 Dec 31, 2002 57.9 Dec 31, 2003 64 Dec 31, 2004 78 Dec 31, 2005 82.2 Dec 31, 2006 87.6 Dec 31, 2007 112.7 Dec 31, 2008 82 Dec 31, 2009 96.1 Dec 31, 2010 121.8

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"view": {"fill": "#e5e5e5"}, "area": {"fill": "#000"}, "line": {"stroke": "#000"}, "rect": {"fill": "#000"}, "bar": {"fill": "#000"}, "point": {"color": "#000", "size": 40}, "axis": {"domain": false, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#FFFFFF", "gridOpacity": 1, "labelColor": "#7F7F7F", "labelPadding": 4, "tickColor": "#7F7F7F", "tickSize": 5.67, "titleFontSize": 16, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 40}, "range": {"category": ["#000000", "#7F7F7F", "#1A1A1A", "#999999", "#333333", "#B0B0B0", "#4D4D4D", "#C9C9C9", "#666666", "#DCDCDC"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24214.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#4D4D4D"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Price in Canadian cents per litre"}, "field": "Price in Canadian cents per litre"}}, "title": ["Average price of home heating oil in the", "Canadian city of Toronto from 1990 to 2011", "(in Canadian cents per litre)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Price per liter has more than tripled since 1990. General trend is up with some drops, but overall trending up.

Chart data: Year Price in Canadian cents per litre Dec 31, 1989 35.6 Dec 31, 1994 38.3 Dec 31, 1999 54.3 Dec 31, 2000 55.9 Dec 31, 2001 50.8 Dec 31, 2002 57.9 Dec 31, 2003 64 Dec 31, 2004 78 Dec 31, 2005 82.2 Dec 31, 2006 87.6 Dec 31, 2007 112.7 Dec 31, 2008 82 Dec 31, 2009 96.1 Dec 31, 2010 121.8

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"view": {"fill": "#e5e5e5"}, "area": {"fill": "#000"}, "line": {"stroke": "#000"}, "rect": {"fill": "#000"}, "bar": {"fill": "#000"}, "point": {"color": "#000", "size": 40}, "axis": {"domain": false, "grid": true, "gridColor": "#FFFFFF", "gridOpacity": 1, "labelColor": "#7F7F7F", "labelPadding": 4, "tickColor": "#7F7F7F", "tickSize": 5.67, "titleFontSize": 16, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "legend": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "labelFontSize": 11, "symbolSize": 40}, "range": {"category": ["#000000", "#7F7F7F", "#1A1A1A", "#999999", "#333333", "#B0B0B0", "#4D4D4D", "#C9C9C9", "#666666", "#DCDCDC"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24214.tsv"}, "mark": "area", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#4D4D4D"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Price in Canadian cents per litre"}, "field": "Price in Canadian cents per litre"}}, "title": ["Average price of home heating oil in the", "Canadian city of Toronto from 1990 to 2011", "(in Canadian cents per litre)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: There has been an overall increase in household income in Kansas since 1990 with a rapid increase since 2010 from just over 40k to over 70k to 2020.

Chart data: Year Household income in current U.S. dollars Dec 31, 1989 29917 Dec 31, 1990 29295 Dec 31, 1991 30346 Dec 31, 1992 29770 Dec 31, 1993 28322 Dec 31, 1994 30341 Dec 31, 1995 32585 Dec 31, 1996 36471 Dec 31, 1997 36711 Dec 31, 1998 37348 Dec 31, 1999 41059 Dec 31, 2000 41415 Dec 31, 2001 42619 Dec 31, 2002 44232 Dec 31, 2003 41066 Dec 31, 2004 42027 Dec 31, 2005 45552 Dec 31, 2006 48497 Dec 31, 2007 47877 Dec 31, 2008 44717 Dec 31, 2009 46054 Dec 31, 2010 46147 Dec 31, 2011 50003 Dec 31, 2012 51485 Dec 31, 2013 53444 Dec 31, 2014 54865 Dec 31, 2015 56810 Dec 31, 2016 57872 Dec 31, 2017 63938 Dec 31, 2018 73151

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"background": "#ffffff", "title": {"anchor": "start", "color": "#000000", "font": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "fontSize": 22, "fontWeight": "normal"}, "area": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "line": {"stroke": "#82c6df", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "bar": {"fill": "#82c6df"}, "point": {"color": "#82c6df", "size": 30}, "axis": {"labelFont": "Benton Gothic, sans-serif", "labelFontSize": 11.5, "labelFontWeight": "normal", "titleFont": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 13, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "axisX": {"labelPadding": 4, "tickSize": 3}, "axisY": {"labelBaseline": "middle", "maxExtent": 45, "minExtent": 45, "tickSize": 2, "titleAlign": "left", "titleAngle": 0, "titleX": -45, "titleY": -11}, "legend": {"labelFont": "Benton Gothic, sans-serif", "labelFontSize": 11.5, "symbolType": "square", "titleFont": "Benton Gothic Bold, sans-serif", "titleFontSize": 13, "titleFontWeight": "normal"}, "range": {"category": ["#ec8431", "#829eb1", "#c89d29", "#3580b1", "#adc839", "#ab7fb4"], "diverging": ["#e68a4f", "#f4bb6a", "#f9e39c", "#dadfe2", "#a6b7c6", "#849eae"], "heatmap": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"], "ordinal": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"], "ramp": ["#fbf2c7", "#f9e39c", "#f8d36e", "#f4bb6a", "#e68a4f", "#d15a40", "#ab4232"]}}, "data": {"url": "data/24215.tsv"}, "mark": "line", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#ab7fb4"}, "x": {"type": "temporal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "Year"}, "y": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"title": "Household income in current U.S. dollars"}, "field": "Household income in current U\\.S\\. dollars"}}, "title": ["Median household income in Kansas from 1990", "to 2019 (in current U.S. dollars)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}
Chart description: Computers and leather use a lot of water to be produced. The rest use significantly less.

Chart data: Water footprint in liters production of food and consumer goods 20000 1 Computer 16600 1 Kg Leather 5000 1 Kg cheese 2700 1 cotton T-shirt 2400 1 Hamburger 1500 1 Kg of sugar 1300 1 Kg of barley 1000 1 liter milk 184 1 Kg tomatoes 140 1 cup of coffee 70 1 apple 40 1 slice of wheat bread

Vega-Lite specification:
{"config": {"area": {"fill": "#30a2da"}, "axis": {"domainColor": "#cbcbcb", "grid": true, "gridColor": "#cbcbcb", "gridWidth": 1, "labelColor": "#999", "labelFontSize": 10, "titleColor": "#333", "tickColor": "#cbcbcb", "tickSize": 10, "titleFontSize": 14, "titlePadding": 10, "labelPadding": 4}, "axisBand": {"grid": false}, "background": "#f0f0f0", "view": {"fill": "#f0f0f0"}, "legend": {"labelColor": "#333", "labelFontSize": 11, "padding": 1, "symbolSize": 30, "symbolType": "square", "titleColor": "#333", "titleFontSize": 14, "titlePadding": 10}, "line": {"stroke": "#30a2da", "strokeWidth": 2}, "rect": {"fill": "#30a2da"}, "bar": {"binSpacing": 2, "fill": "#30a2da", "stroke": null}, "range": {"category": ["#30a2da", "#fc4f30", "#e5ae38", "#6d904f", "#8b8b8b", "#b96db8", "#ff9e27", "#56cc60", "#52d2ca", "#52689e", "#545454", "#9fe4f8"], "diverging": ["#cc0020", "#e77866", "#f6e7e1", "#d6e8ed", "#91bfd9", "#1d78b5"], "heatmap": ["#d6e8ed", "#cee0e5", "#91bfd9", "#549cc6", "#1d78b5"]}, "point": {"filled": true, "shape": "circle"}, "title": {"anchor": "start", "fontSize": 24, "fontWeight": 600, "offset": 20}}, "data": {"url": "data/24224.tsv"}, "mark": "bar", "encoding": {"color": {"value": "#9fe4f8"}, "x": {"type": "quantitative", "axis": {"labelAngle": -60, "title": "Water footprint in liters"}, "field": "Water footprint in liters"}, "y": {"type": "nominal", "axis": {}, "bin": false, "field": "production of food and consumer goods"}}, "title": ["Needed water for the production of food", "and consumer goods (in liters)"], "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v4.8.1.json"}