Wniosek dotyczący decyzji Rady zmieniającej decyzję 2004/465/WE w sprawie wkładu finansowego Wspólnoty w programy kontroli rybołówstwa Państw Członkowskich /* COM/2005/0328 końcowy - CNS 2005/0013 */





[pic] | KOMISJA WSPÓLNOT EUROPEJSKICH | Bruksela, dnia 20.7.2005 COM(2005)328 koncowy 2005/0136(CNS) Wniosek dotyczący DECYZJI RADY zmieniającej decyzję 2004/465/WE w sprawie wkładu finansowego Wspólnoty w programy kontroli rybołówstwa Państw Członkowskich . (przedstawiona przez Komisję) UZASADNIENIE Od 1991 r. Wspólnota udziela Państwom Członkowskim pomocy finansowej na kontrolę rybołówstwa. Polityka ta opiera się na fakcie, że środki kontroli wiążą się z wysokimi kosztami, w szczególności w odniesieniu do kontroli na morzu przy użyciu statków patrolowych i powietrznych statków patrolowych oraz inwestycji w technologię i sieci informatyczne (IT). Mając na uwadze ten cel zostały przyjęte cztery decyzje Rady ustanawiające wsparcie Wspólnoty na wydatki Państw Członkowskich na inspekcję rybołówstwa: decyzja 89/631/EWG obejmująca lata 1991 - 1995, decyzja 95/527/EWG obejmująca lata 1996 - 2000, decyzja 2001/431/WE obejmująca lata 2001 - 2003 i decyzja 2004/465/WE obejmująca lata 2004 i 2005. Analiza wyników tego programu wyraźnie pokazuje, że pomoc finansowa Wspólnoty dla Państw Członkowskich ma bardzo pozytywny wpływ na krajowe systemy inspekcji. Decyzja 2004/465/WE traci ważność dnia 31 grudnia 2005 r., a nowe ramy finansowe dla rybołówstwa (obejmujące okres 2007-2013) nie wejdą w życie do 2007 r. Dlatego też konieczne jest przedłużenie obecnego programu finansowego przyjętego na mocy decyzji 2004/465/WE o jeden rok tak, aby do czasu wejścia w życie nowego programu finansowego w dalszym ciągu było dostępne wsparcie Wspólnoty na zaplanowane przez Państwa Członkowskie wydatki na kontrolę rybołówstwa, oraz w celu zachęcenia Państw Członkowskich do inwestycji w tym obszarze, biorąc pod uwagę również potrzeby Wspólnotowej Agencji Kontroli Rybołówstwa. Proponowana decyzja to w istocie odnowienie na okres jednego roku decyzji 2004/465/WE. Bez zmian pozostają priorytety oraz działania, które kwalifikują się do finansowego wsparcia Wspólnoty, a terminy dla Państw Członkowskich na przedłożenie sprawozdań dotyczących dokonanych postępów zostały odpowiednio zmienione. W związku z potrzebą dalszego zwiększenia poziomu pomocy technicznej dla służb Komisji zostały jednak dodane dwa nowe działania kwalifikujące się do finansowego wsparcia Wspólnoty. Ze szczególną uwagą zostaną potraktowane potrzeby Państw Członkowskich, które przystąpiły do UE w 2004 r. Zaplanowana na 2006 r. kwota wynosi 35 milionów EUR. Komisja zwraca się do Rady o przyjęcie załączonego wniosku. 2005/0136 (CNS) Wniosek dotyczący DECYZJI RADY zmieniającej decyzję 2004/465/WE w sprawie wkładu finansowego Wspólnoty w programy kontroli rybołówstwa Państw Członkowskich RADA UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ, uwzględniając Traktat ustanawiający Wspólnotę Europejską, w szczególności jego art. 37, uwzględniając wniosek Komisji[1], uwzględniając opinię Parlamentu Europejskiego[2], a także mając na uwadze, co następuje: (1) Wspólna Polityka Rybołówstwa (WPRyb) określa ogólne zasady dotyczące ochrony, zarządzania i odpowiedzialnej eksploatacji żywych zasobów wodnych oraz ich przetwarzania i wprowadzania do obrotu. (2) W rozporządzeniu (WE) nr 2371/2002 z dnia 20 grudnia 2002 r. w sprawie ochrony i zrównoważonej eksploatacji zasobów rybołówstwa w ramach Wspólnej Polityki Rybołówstwa[3] podkreślono potrzebę zwiększenia współpracy i koordynacji między Państwami Członkowskimi oraz z Komisją, w celu wzmocnienia kontroli i zniechęcania do postępowania sprzecznego z zasadami WPRyb. (3) Okres objęty decyzją Rady 2004/465/WE[4] w sprawie wkładu finansowego Wspólnoty w programy kontroli rybołówstwa Państw Członkowskich wygasa dnia 31 grudnia 2005 r. (4) W związku z wewnętrznymi trudnościami budżetowymi i administracyjnymi, Państwa Członkowskie, które przystąpiły do Wspólnoty dnia 1 maja 2004 r., otrzymały bardzo ograniczoną pomoc finansową Wspólnoty w ramach obecnego systemu finansowego przewidzianego na mocy decyzji 2004/465/WE. (5) Nowa perspektywa finansowa obejmie okres 2007-2013. W celu uniknięcia przerwania finansowego wsparcia Wspólnoty, jest zatem konieczna kontynuacja w 2006 r. pomocy finansowej dostępnej dla Państw Członkowskich zgodnie z decyzją 2004/465/WE. (6) Stosowne jest uwzględnienie w decyzji 2004/465/WE badań kontroli rybołówstwa, a także uzgodnień mających na celu ułatwienie wdrażania nowych technologii w zakresie kontroli. PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZĄ DECYZJĘ: Artykuł l W decyzji 2004/465/WE wprowadza się następujące zmiany: (1) W art. 3 ust. 2 otrzymuje brzmienie: „2. Wszystkie Państwa Członkowskie zobowiązane są przedłożyć swoje roczne programy kontroli rybołówstwa do dnia 1 czerwca 2004 r. w odniesieniu do 2004 r., oraz do dnia 31 stycznia 2005 r. w odniesieniu do 2005 r. i 2006 r.” (2) W art. 4 ust. 1 dodaje się następujące litery: „(i) Uzgodnienia administracyjne ze Wspólnym Centrum Badawczym mające na celu wdrażanie nowych technologii w zakresie kontroli; (j) Badania w obszarach związanych z kontrolą przeprowadzone z inicjatywy Komisji.” (3) W art. 5 ust. 1 zdanie pierwsze otrzymuje brzmienie: „Finansowa kwota referencyjna na wdrożenie działań, na które przewidziano pomoc finansową w latach 2004-2006 wynosi 105 mln EUR.” (4) W art. 6 ust. 2 dodaje się następującą literę: „(d) w odniesieniu do działalności określonej w art. 4 ust. 1 lit. i) i art. 4 ust. 1 lit. j), stawka może wynieść 100 % dopuszczalnych wydatków.” (5) W art. 12 ust. 2 datę „31 grudnia 2008 r.” zastępuje się datą „31 grudnia 2010 r.”. (6) W art. 16 lit. b) datę „31 grudnia 2006 r.” zastępuje się datą „31 grudnia 2007 r.”. (7) W art. 16 lit. b) pkt v) otrzymuje brzmienie: „(v) wpływ wkładu finansowego na programy kontroli rybołówstwa przez cały okres od 2001 do 2006 r.” (8) W art. 17 datę „30 czerwca 2007 r.” zastępuje się datą „30 czerwca 2008 r.”. Artykuł 2 Niniejszą decyzję stosuje się od dnia 1 stycznia 2006 r. Artykuł 3 Niniejsza decyzja skierowana jest do Państw Członkowskich. Sporządzono w Brukseli, W imieniu Rady Przewodniczący LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. NAME OF THE PROPOSAL: Community financial contribution towards Member States fisheries control programmes 2. ABM / ABB FRAMEWORK Policy Area(s) concerned and associated Activity/Activities:Line 1107: Fisheries conservation, control. 3. BUDGET LINES 3.1. Budget lines (operational lines and related technical and administrative assistance lines (ex- B.A lines)) including headings: 11.07.02. Financial contribution to the Member States for expenditure in the field of control 3.2. Duration of the action and of the financial impact: 2006 3.3. Budgetary characteristics ( add rows if necessary ): Budget line | Type of expenditure | New | EFTA contribution | Contributions from applicant countries | Heading in financial perspective | 110702 | Non-comp | Diff[5]/ | NO | NO | NO | No 3 | 4. SUMMARY OF RESOURCES 4.1. Financial Resources 4.1.1. Summary of commitment appropriations (CA) and payment appropriations (PA) EUR million (to 3 decimal places) Expenditure type | Section no. | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | n + 4 | n + 5 and later | Total | Operational expenditure[6] | Commitment Appropriations (CA) | 8.1 | a | 35,000 | 35,000 | Payment Appropriations (PA) | b | 3,000 | 7,000 | 14,000 | 11,000 | 35,000 | Administrative expenditure within reference amount[7] | Technical & administrative assistance (NDA) | 8.2.4 | c | TOTAL REFERENCE AMOUNT | Commitment Appropriations | a+c | 35,000 | 35,000 | Payment Appropriations | b+c | 3,000 | 7,000 | 14,000 | 11,000 | 35,000 | Administrative expenditure not included in reference amount[8] | Human resources and associated expenditure (NDA) | 8.2.5 | d | 0,378 | 0,378 | 0,378 | 0,378 | Administrative costs, other than human resources and associated costs, not included in reference amount (NDA) | 8.2.6 | e | 0,055 | 0,12 | 0,020 | 0,020 | Total indicative financial cost of intervention TOTAL CA including cost of Human Resources | a+c+d+e | 35,433 | 0,498 | 0,398 | 0,398 | 36,727 | TOTAL PA including cost of Human Resources | b+c+d+e | 3,433 | 7,498 | 14,398 | 11,398 | 36,727 | Co-financing details If the proposal involves co-financing by Member States, or other bodies (please specify which), an estimate of the level of this co-financing should be indicated in the table below (additional lines may be added if different bodies are foreseen for the provision of the co-financing): EUR million (to 3 decimal places) Co-financing body | Year n | n + 1 | n + 2 | n + 3 | n + 4 | n + 5 and later | Total | …………………… | f | TOTAL CA including co-financing | a+c+d+e+f | 4.1.2. Compatibility with Financial Programming (x Proposal is compatible with existing financial programming. ( Proposal will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in the financial perspective. ( Proposal may require application of the provisions of the Inter-institutional Agreement[9] (i.e. flexibility instrument or revision of the financial perspective). 4.1.3. Financial impact on Revenue (x Proposal has no financial implications on revenue ( Proposal has financial impact – the effect on revenue is as follows: NB: All details and observations relating to the method of calculating the effect on revenue should be shown in a separate annex. EUR million (to one decimal place) Prior to action [Year n-1] | Situation following action | Total number of human resources | 3 + ½ | 3+ 1/2 | 3 + 1/2 | 3 + ½ | 5. CHARACTERISTICS AND OBJECTIVES Details of the context of the proposal are required in the Explanatory Memorandum. This section of the Legislative Financial Statement should include the following specific complementary information: 5.1. Needs to be met in the short or long term The objective of the Common Fisheries policy is to provide for sustainable exploitation of living aquatic resources and of aquaculture in the context of sustainable development. In order to ensure the effective implementation of the CFP (control, inspection and enforcement of the rules of the CFP falls within the responsibility of Member States), the Community control and enforcement system for fisheries should be reinforced and co-operation and co-ordination between all relevant authorities should be strengthened. This goal is being achieved through a number of actions performed by Member States which have been financed by the Community since 1990, and consequently in line with the objectives established under Council Regulation n° 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the CFP[11]. The financial assistance granted to Member States by the Community has been done on the basis of national programmes on expenditure for fisheries control purposes. 5.2. Value-added of Community involvement and coherence of the proposal with other financial instruments and possible synergy Regulation n°2371/2002[12] establishes the obligations of Member States on fisheries control activities. However, without constant pressure and monitoring by the Commission, Member States will not fulfil their duties in accordance with the standards required by Community law. Furthermore, improvements towards an efficient control system throughout the Community will be difficult to achieve without incentives, in particular when new technologies shall be tested and introduced where appropriate. 5.3. Objectives, expected results and related indicators of the proposal in the context of the ABM framework Objectives: The situation as regards control means of Member States seems to be very much the same as in the beginning of 2004. Under-capacities in fishing control are especially significant for new Member States. It is thus necessary that Community financial assistance continues to be available to Member States in 2006 in the form and conditions established under Decision 2004/465[13]. Results: Financing rates and conditions established under Decision 2004/465/EC remain unchanged, and are made applicable under the proposed Decision for one further year until 31.12.2006. In particular, reimbursement on aircraft and vessel expenditure will continue to be applied under the proposed Decision with priority to the new Member States. Indicators: The Commission will continue to focus on the assessment tools that can be considered the best indicators to assess the effectiveness of the policy (i.e. number of infringements detected over a period, the rate of procedures ended compared with the procedures opened, the number of inspections at sea or at ports, or the number of sightings recorded by the aerial surveillance). The information provided by IT systems able to collect data from landing points, thus controlling the level of catch uptake (in regard to available quotas and the status of stocks), are also important assessment elements. 5.4. Method of Implementation (indicative) Show below the method(s)[14] chosen for the implementation of the action. ( x Centralised Management (x Directly by the Commission ( Indirectly by delegation to: ( Executive Agencies ( Bodies set up by the Communities as referred to in art. 185 of the Financial Regulation ( National public-sector bodies/bodies with public-service mission ( Shared or decentralised management ( With Member states ( With Third countries ( Joint management with international organisations (please specify) Relevant comments: 6. MONITORING AND EVALUATION 6.1. Monitoring system The proposed Decision carries over for 2006 the principles and rules established in Decision 2004/465/EC on this issue. Expenditure must have been incurred in compliance both with the general condition specified in Decision 2004/465/EC and the specific conditions provided for by the future Commission decision fixing the amount granted. On its side, the Commission may require Member States to carry out on-the-spot checks on projects or may decide to carry them out with its own officials. The Commission maintains as well all existing checks and balances in regard to fraud: in particular, in the event any amount has been unduly paid, it shall be repaid to the Commission, with interest. It is worth noting that the Commission only reimburses invoices that the national administrations have paid. Member States shall report yearly to the Commission how their programmes are implemented, any variation they had to introduce on their programmes and shall assess the impact of the expenditure on control, inspection and surveillance activities. The proposed Decision provides for a final assessment on the 2001-2006 programmes to be forwarded to the Commission in 2007. The proposed Decision foresees that the report by the Commission on the outcome of the scheme will be sent to the European Parliament and the Council in 2008. In this report indicators mentioned above will be used to gauge the impact of this scheme. 6.2. Evaluation 6.2.1. Ex-ante evaluation Through the financial scheme provided for by Decisions 89/631[15], 95/527[16], 2001/431[17] and 2004/465[18], Member States have with no doubt reinforced their control structures and their inspectors’ skills. This has been largely assessed in several documents, such as Commission’s Reports on the monitoring of the implementation of the CFP Rules by the Member States. Extensive details on the effects of such actions have also been given in the Legislative Financial Statement of Council Decision 2004/465/EC, in the Report of the Commission to the Council and European Parliament on Decision 89/631[19], the Report of May 2000 on Decision 95/527[20] and the Commission Communication on the compliance with the rules of the CFP of June 2003, which set up a Compliance scoreboard and was made available to the general public through the Commission's web-site[21]. If an overall conclusion is to be drawn from these documents, is that without further investments in equipment and training, the control systems of Member States will not be able to correspond to the standards required by Community law. In addition, attention must be drawn to the fact that ten new Member States joined the Community on 1st May 2004, and that during 2004 some of these Member States faced internal budgetary problems which have made them have to delay certain expenditure on fisheries control for one or two years. Hence, in order to facilitate and speed up the attainment of Community standards in the fisheries control field, financial aid will continue to be necessary in the interim period between the expiry of Decision 2004/465 (i.e. 31.12.2005) and the date when the future Fisheries Control Agency becomes fully operational. 6.2.2. Measures taken following an intermediate/ex-post evaluation (lessons learned from similar experiences in the past) Though assessment is very much dependant on specific monitoring, control and surveillance strategies adopted by each Member States (which are in turn a consequence of the different features of the fleet, the size of fishing grounds, quantity and value of catches landed), it appears that there is still room for improvement on the main issues of control i.e. patrol vessels and aircraft and technology systems and their network, the fitting on board of Vessel Monitoring Systems on board vessels, and training, the enhancement of pilot projects and cost/benefit analysis of expenditure in the control activity (in the case of all Member States). Moreover, it is proposed to finance two new actions: the first will be aimed at setting up administrative arrangements with the Community Joint Research Centre (JRC), so that this body may provide technical assistance in the development of control techniques. The second will allow the Commission’s services to carry out studies on matters related to control issues. 6.2.3. Terms and frequency of future evaluation The proposed Council Decision only affects the reports foreseen in Decision 2004/465/EC (articles 16 and 17) in their timing. All other elements of reporting already foreseen remain unchanged. The final report to be drawn up by the Member States before 31.12.2007 will allow a thorough ex post evaluation of the scheme which will be presented the following year by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. In the matter of control, it is not easy to quantify the results, especially in the short term. The overall goal of this initiative is to enhance a control culture among the stakeholders in the fisheries sector which will allow an unreserved compliance with the CFP rules. Without effective control, conservation rules are useless; without adherence to rules, control activities will never be successful. 7. ANTI-FRAUD MEASURES The Member States shall verify and certify that expenditure for which a reimbursement is claimed has been incurred in compliance with the rules laid down by the Decision. If the Commission considers that the claim does not comply with the conditions laid down, it shall refuse to reimburse all or part of the expenditure at issue. The Members States shall provide the Commission with any information it may request and they must keep supporting documents available to the Commission for at least 5 years from the date of reimbursement. Commission officials may carry out or take part on ex-post control. In the event of irregularity, any amount unduly paid shall be repaid to the Commission, together with interest. 8. DETAILS OF RESOURCES 8.1. Objectives of the proposal in terms of their financial cost Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 8.2.2. Description of tasks deriving from the action - - In view of the principle of sound financial management, assure the respect of the Financial Regulation rules when implementing the concerned Community legislation. - - Assure a good execution of available credits, in conformity with applicable rules and procedures. 8.2.3. Sources of human resources (statutory) (When more than one source is stated, please indicate the number of posts originating from each of the sources) (x Posts currently allocated to the management of the programme to be replaced or extended ( Posts pre-allocated within the APS/PDB exercise for year n ( Posts to be requested in the next APS/PDB procedure ( Posts to be redeployed using existing resources within the managing service (internal redeployment) ( Posts required for year n although not foreseen in the APS/PDB exercise of the year in question 8.2.4. Other Administrative expenditure included in reference amount (XX 01 04/05 – Expenditure on administrative management) EUR million (to 3 decimal places) Budget line (number and heading) | Year n | Year n+1 | Year n+2 | Year n+3 | Year n+4 | Year n+5 and later | TOTAL | Other technical and administrative assistance | - intra muros | - extra muros | Total Technical and administrative assistance | 8.2.5. Financial cost of human resources and associated costs not included in the reference amount EUR million (to 3 decimal places) Type of human resources | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | Year n+4 | Year n+5 and later | Officials and temporary staff (XX 01 01) | 0, 378 | 0, 378 | 0, 378 | 0, 378 | Staff financed by Art XX 01 02 (auxiliary, END, contract staff, etc.) (specify budget line) | Total cost of Human Resources and associated costs (NOT in reference amount) | 0, 378 | 0, 378 | 0,378 | 0, 378 | Calculation– Officials and Temporary agents Reference should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable 3 x €108 000 = € 324 000 ½ x €108 000 = €54 000 Calculation– Staff financed under art. XX 01 02 Reference should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable 8.2.6 Other administrative expenditure not included in reference amount EUR million (to 3 decimal places) | XX 01 02 11 02 – Meetings & Conferences | XX 01 02 11 03 – Committees[27] | 0,035 | 0,035 | XX 01 02 11 04 – Studies & consultations | 0,10 | 0,10 | XX 01 02 11 05 – Information systems | 2 Total Other Management Expenditure (XX 01 02 11) | 3 Other expenditure of an administrative nature (specify including reference to budget line) | Total Administrative expenditure, other than human resources and associated costs (NOT included in reference amount) | 0,055 | 0,12 | 0,020 | 0,020 | 0,215 | Calculation - Other administrative expenditure not included in reference amount [1] Dz.U. C z […], […], str. […]. [2] Dz.U. C z […], […], str. […]. [3] Dz.U. L 358 z 31.12.2002, str. 59. [4] Dz.U. L 157 z 30.4.2004, str. 114, sprostowanie Dz.U. L 195 2.6.2004, str. 36. [5] Differentiated appropriations [6] Expenditure that does not fall under Chapter xx 01 of the Title xx concerned. [7] Expenditure within article xx 01 04 of Title xx. [8] Expenditure within chapter xx 01 other than articles xx 01 04 or xx 01 05. [9] See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional agreement. [10] Additional columns should be added if necessary i.e. if the duration of the action exceeds 6 years [11] JO L 358, 31.12.2002. [12] See Art.23 (2) of R.n°2371/2002. [13] A detailed exposé on this issue is to be found in point 5 (“Description and Grounds” of the Legislative Financial Statement of Decision 2004/465/EC. [14] If more than one method is indicated please provide additional details in the "Relevant comments" section of this point [15] JO L 364, 14.12.1989. [16] JO L 301, 14.12.1995. [17] JO L 154, 9.6.2001. [18] JO L 157, 30.4.2004, as amended by JO L 195, 2.6.2004. [19] COM(1995) 268. [20] See Legislative Financial Statement to Decision 2004/465/EC, point 5. [21] COM(2003) 344. [22] As described under Section 5.3 [23] Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount [24] Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount [25] Cost of which is included within the reference amount [26] Reference should be made to the specific legislative financial statement for the Executive Agency(ies) concerned. [27] Specify the type of committee and the group to which it belongs.