* it EUROOPAN YHTEISÖJEN KOMISSIO 
Bryssel, 19.04.1995 
KOM(95) 147 lopull. 
95/0096 (CNS) 
KERTOMUS NEUVOSTOLLE JA PARLAMENTILLE 
maitokuntiöjäijestelmän 
soveltamisesta Italiassa ja Kreikassa 
Ehdotus 
NEUVOSTON ASETUKSEKSI (EY) 
maito- ja maitotuotealan lisämaksusta 
annetun asetuksen (ETY) N:o 3950/92 
muuttamisesta 
(komission esittämä) 

Report to the Council and the European Parliament 
on the application of the milk quota scheme 
in Italy and Greece 
Introduction 
1. On 27 July 1994 the Council adopted on the basis of Commission report COM (94) 64 final 
of 2 March 1994 and additional report COM(94) 150 final of 18 April 1994 Regulation (EC) 
No 1883/94 determining the guaranteed total quantities for the period 1994/95. The last 
paragraph of Article 1 provides as follows: 
"The increase in total quantities of deliveries granted for the period 1993/94 for Greece, Spain 
and Italy shall be established for Spain and shall be extended for the period 1994/95 for 
Greece and Italy. The total quantity of deliveries for Italy includes a reserve of 
347 701 tonnes for allocation, in so far as necessary and in agreement with the Commission, 
of reference quantities to producers who have brought legal proceedings against a national 
administration following withdrawal of their reference quantities and obtained judgment in 
their favour. Before the period 1995/96 the Commission will submit to the Council a report 
accompanied by proposals on whether the increase for Greece and the amount of the increase 
for Italy must be maintained in 1995/96 and for the subsequent years." 
This report, and the accompanying proposals, fulfils that requirement. It reflects the situation 
observed during inspection visits to the two Member States, the most recent of which ended 
on 15 February, and includes all significant developments brought to the attention of the 
Commission since the previous report. 
Requirements to be met 
2. The increases in the national guaranteed quantity allocated from 1993/94 to Italy 
(0.9 million tonnes, including the reserve of 347 701 tonnes) and Greece (0.1 million tonnes) 
were subject to effective implementation of the quota scheme. Certain key requirements 
provide an appropriate framework wilhin which progress achieved in each Member State can 
be assessed. These include: 
(a) adoption of implementing regulations; 
(b) calculation of individual reference quantities on the basis of deliveries to purchasers 
in 1991/92, together with individual references for fat; 
(c) setting up and equipping of a central agency to verify production records and 
collection of levies; 
(d) satisfactory records of production; 
(e) collection of levies from producers. 
In addition, from the 1995/96 marketing year the sum of the quotas allocated by Italy must 
correspond to the amounts set by the Council (point (f) of this report). 
Commission monitoring 
3. Following the adoption of the Council Regulation on 27 July 1994 the Commission 
departments have been monitoring very closely the situation in the two Member States. In the 
period since the last report to the Council the EAGGF has made 8 inspection visits to Rome 
and 11 to the regions of Italy and 3 to Athens and the main milk-producing regions in Greece. 
Commission inspectors have received full cooperation in the course of these visits. 
As with earlier Commission reports, the approach in this report is to measure progress against 
the requirements identified for the grant of increases in the national guaranteed quantity. 
(a) Adoption of implementing regulations 
4. In Italy a legal measure has been adopted (Decreto Legge No 727 of 23 December 1994) in 
order to limit, in 1995/96, the grant of individual quotas to a total that will allow the national 
guaranteed quantity to be observed (9 930 000 tonnes), while leaving a reserve to cover 
special situations and the outcome of legal proceedings which are still pending. A number of 
other measures covering such matters as the national compensation mechanism and the 
national reserve are expected to be adopted. 
On 9 November 1994 an order was adopted in Greece establishing a national reserve and 
determining the quotas for 1994/95 to which a 2.5% across-the-board cut was applied. All the 
laws required for the implementation of the milk quota scheme have now been adopted. 
5. The Commission has expressed reservations about the role of the producers' associations in 
administering certain aspects of the scheme in Italy, in particular the compensation 
mechanism. 
The Commission's concern about the role of these associations is heightened by a provision 
in the national implementing rules which leaves open the possibility that the National Union 
of Milk Producers (UNALAT) may assume responsibility for managing the flow of 
information on milk deliveries and other aspects of the quota scheme. In particular, the 
producers' associations effect the end-of-year compensations between producers with deliveries 
under and over quota. The Commission has initiated an infringement procedure under Article 
169 of the Treaty and has asked the Italian authorities to ensure that the quota arrangements 
are applied independently of producers' organizations and that such organizations not be 
involved, in any case, in any of the control aspects. 
(b) Calculation and allocation of individual reference quantities on the basis of deliveries to 
purchasers in 1991/92 
6. The individual reference quantities have been calculated in the two Member States: 
in Italy they have been fixed partly on the basis of deliveries in 1988/89 (known as A 
quotas) and partly on the basis of the increase in deliveries between 1988/89 and 1991/92 
(known as B quotas, which are provisional); 
in Greece, in November 1993, the authorities altered the basis for allocating the quotas 
which had been adopted in June of that year. The quotas are now calculated according 
to a formula that includes deliveries in 1991/92 and 1992/93 with greater weight being 
given to the latter. 
7. There have been delays in the procedure for allocating quotas to producers, mainly as a result 
of the examination of appeals against allocation decisions. 
In Italy, as had been agreed in the Council, the Commission departments verified the 
procedure introduced for examining administrative appeals, and in particular inspection reports 
and supporting documents. Out of 40 843 applications for the review of individual allocations, 
24 030 were found prima facie to be justified, by agreement between the national authorities 
and the Commission, and were included in the amending bulletin of 15 December 1994, 
which raised the total for the individual quotas by 577 400 tonnes. The verification undertaken 
in Rome and the regions confirmed that the whole of the reserve had been properly allocated. 
8. The authorities are continuing to examine appeals, of which 12 759 were still outstanding on 
the publication of the amending bulletin for 1994/95. Quantities still to be allocated on 
completion of the appeal procedure will be allocated in 1995/96 and charged against the 
reserve to be established through the suppression of part of the B quotas. The balance of the 
B quotas has been retained in 1995/96. Room for manoeuvre exists in that, where necessary, 
quotas can be allocated later to producers who have appealed, even in situations where the 
reserve has been used up. The reserve of 235.948 tonnes was established on the publication 
of the 1995/96 quotas. 
Examination of the Law adopted by the Italian Parliament on 24 February 1995 indicates, 
however, that the range of admissible appeals could be increased considerably as a result 
mainly of the admission of claims by beneficiaries of regional development plans, and of the 
acknowledgement of entitlement to claimed quotas pending a final decision on appeals. The 
Commission informed the Italian authorities on 13 March 1995 that it cannot accept that the 
sum of the quotas applicable, including those of producers who have lodged an appeal, should 
exceed the guaranteed total quantity at any time after 1 April 1995. 
In Greece the authorities allocated the quotas for 1994/95, again with a considerable delay, 
the allocation only being made in November 1994. As in Italy, a number of producers 
appealed against their allocation. All have now been dealt with. However, a difficulty arose 
on completion of the procedure in that an extra 24 000 tonnes of quota were needed as a 
result of judgments awarded in favour of some producers. Because the original reserve was 
insufficient (7 400 tonnes), and in order to remain within the national guaranteed quantity, a 
2.5% across-the-board reduction was applied to all quotas. For 1994/95 an allocation of 
620 053 tonnes was made and a national reserve of 6 000 tonnes established. Requests from 
new producers ( around 1 500) have still to be met however. 
It has been established, lastly, from the end-of-year accounts that 2 300 producers with no 
quota made deliveries in 1993/94. Even though only small producers were involved and the 
production was declared, the Greek authorities have been asked to remedy the situation as 
quickly as possible since the producers in question will be subject to heavy penalties if there 
is an overrun of the guaranteed total quantity, and consequently measures have been adppted. 
10. Allocation of quotas for direct sales 
In Italy the quotas for direct sales were allocated in accordance with the same conditions and 
procedures as were applied to deliveries. The structural conversion of marketing from direct 
sales to deliveries is continuing and Italy has agreed to a large number of individual requests 
for transfers between quotas for direct sales and quotas for deliveries, as provided for under 
the Community rules. The Commission has therefore adjusted the allocation of the overall 
quantities for Italy by Regulation (EC) No 630/95 of 23.03.1995. 
In Greece the quotas for direct sales for 1993/94 were allocated after the end of the marketing 
year. The quantity allocated concerns only 162 producers and a total of 862 tonnes out of the 
4 528 tonnes of national quantity available. No other significant information is available since 
the producers of milk for direct sales have not submitted declarations for 1993/94 and on top 
of that direct sales are officially discouraged on public health grounds in a number of 
regions. 
(c) Setting up and equipping of a central agency to verify production records and the collection 
of levies 
11. The two Member States have designated central agencies. 
From the operational point of view EIMA in Italy has been responsible from the outset for 
the establishment and monitoring of the quota scheme and has played an active role in both 
these tasks. 
The situation is different in Greece. The powers, functions and resources of the central 
agency, ELOG, were prescribed by law in June 1993 but it was not until 18 April 1994 that 
it actually took on responsibility for administering the quota scheme. The head office in 
Thessalonika, which is adequately equipped, has been the main driving force behind the 
progress that has been achieved in Greece. Concern was nevertheless expressed regarding staff 
recruited in 1994 on a temporary basis whose contracts were not renewed in 1995. ELOG has 
now recruited a number of staff sufficient to fulfil its obligations. 
Up to now the two agencies established in Italy and Greece have performed their duties, 
(d) Satisfactory records of production 
12. The authorities' first duty was to approve purchasers. In Italy this has been carried out by the 
regional authorities. In Greece ELOG administered the approval procedure. In Italy, with the 
exception of a number of marginal cases - which are now being dealt with - , this task can 
be said to have been properly carried out. In Greece it would appear that not all milk 
purchasers have been identified or approved. The authorities at the moment are speeding up 
an investigation designed to complete the approval procedure. 
13. In Italy the majority of the declarations from purchasers in the major milk-producing regions 
arrived before the statutory deadline of 15 May. Where a purchaser failed to fulfil the 
obligation to submit a declaration of deliveries, the producers' associations equalled out the 
overruns using the supporting documents (invoices) submitted by the producers in order to 
calculate the quantities delivered to the purchasers who had failed to submit returns. 
Administrative checks on these declarations, by EEMA, which should have been completed 
by 31 August 1994, were considerably delayed by virtue of the fact that this was the first year 
the procedure was being applied and it was only in mid-February 1995 that the Italian 
authorities could calculate the deliveries for 1993/94 more or less definitively at 9 606 033 
tonnes. The only significant shortcoming was the failure by some small dairies to determine 
the fat content of the milk delivered. 
Physical checks on dairies and producers, required under Community rules, were undertaken 
and satisfactorily carried out in most dairies. Purchasers who failed to submit returns were all 
included in the sample of undertakings to be checked, which was sent by EIMA to the 
regional authorities responsible for carrying out the checks. 
14. In Greece, generally speaking, declarations were submitted by 15 May 1994. Since the figures 
they contained were frequently inaccurate, particularly in the case of producers who had 
changed purchaser during the year, the central agency, ELOG, asked purchasers to present 
a second declaration and once that had been processed it was possible to establish that 
deliveries for 1993/94 were below the guaranteed total quantity: 602 106 tonnes rather than 
625 985 tonnes. Mistakes have still to be corrected but are unlikely to affect that figure 
significantly. 
As in Italy, small dairies did not make an analysis of fat content. Since this involves a small 
number of producers only (some 5%), it is not likely to jeopardize the overall operation of 
the system, or undermine the figures provided by the Greek authorities for 1993/94. 
The declarations made by purchasers included some 2 300 producers who had no quota, 
covering deliveries amounting to 19 116 tonnes (see point 9). 
ELOG carried out all the on-the-spot checks on purchasers planned for 1993/94 with the 
assistance of the regional agricultural authorities. 
(e) Collection of levies from producers 
15. In Italy, as is permitted under Community rules, levies were collected in the form of advances 
during the marketing year. Greece chose not to apply this system. 
In Italy, after equalling out had taken place at the level of the producers' associations and 
following a number of transfers between quotas for deliveries 
and transfers for direct sales, no overruns were recorded at national level, and the purchasers 
were called upon to reimburse the advance, as required under national law. 
In Greece too the national quota was not exceeded. Consequently, as provided for under 
Community rules, no levy was collected, including from producers who made deliveries but 
had no quota. 
(f) Quantitative aspects 
16. Following the publication of the decision of 31.03.1995, Italy allocated individual quotas to 
110.415 producers as follows: 
A quota 
(permanent) B quota 
(provisional) Total 
(1 000 t) National 
quota 
a) 
Deliveries 8 330 1 084 9 414 9 632 
Direct sales 255 25 280 298 
Total 8 585 1 109 9 694 9 930 
(1) After transfer between quotas for direct sales and quotas for deliveries of 
420 000 tonnes decided on 23.03.1995 
Compared with the quotas allocated, as shown in the table above, deliveries in 1993/94 
are calculated to be 9 606 033 tonnes and direct sales to 217 687 tonnes, i.e. a total of 
9 823 720 tonnes. From these figures it can be seen that production is 1% below the 
national guaranteed quantity (9 930 000 tonnes). 
There is a danger, however, that acknowledgement of the quotas of producers 
appealing against their allocation (see point 8 above) could bring the total of the quotas 
applicable above the national guaranteed quantity. If that should happen, financial 
consequences may be drawn as part of the accounts clearance operation, as has 
happened in the case of other Member States in similar circumstances. 
17. In the case of Greece, the quotas allocated for 1994/95 amount to 620 053 tonnes, as 
compared with a total reference quantity (deliveries) of 625 985 tonnes. Given that 
production declared in 1993/94 amounted to 602 106 tonnes, it is very likely that 
production in 1994/95 will reach the level of the national guaranteed quantity. 
Conclusions on the implementation of the system 
18. With some exceptions such as those referred to in paragraph 5, all the laws required 
have been adopted in Italy and Greece. Significant progress has been achieved in 
implementing the milk quota scheme, although there have been delays in completing 
the procedure for allocating individual quotas to producers in the two countries and in 
the recording and administrative control of returns of deliveries. 
The Commission concludes therefore that the two Member States have on the whole 
complied with the Council requirements for the implementation of the milk quota 
scheme in 1993/94, and that Italy has satisfied those concerning the use of the reserve 
for allocation to producers who obtain judgment in their favour in legal proceedings and 
compliance with the national guaranteed quantity on 1 April 1995. 
The Commission departments will continue to ensure that the scheme is properly 
applied and to improve various aspects that remain to be improved and, in situations 
where it is not being applied properly, will take any action that may be necessary under 
the accounts clearance procedure and/or the infringement procedure. 
Assessment of the request for an additional increase in the Greek quota 
19. In their memorandum on the allocation of an additional quota, the Greek authorities 
request an increase of 125 000 tonnes in the national milk quota for the 1995/96 
marketing year in addition to the increase of 100 000 tonnes granted provisionally for 
the period 1993/94. 
10 
The arguments put forward are similar to those advanced in 1992 to support the request 
for an increase of 100 000 tonnes. The small, but rapidly growing quantity of milk used 
for the preparation of fresh products, the small volume of the Greek quota compared 
with those of other Member States, the fact that Greece does not use the intervention 
mechanisms provided for under the COM to any great extent, the distance of Greece 
from Community regions with milk surpluses, a producer price at a fairly high level 
compared with the target price and the low level of self-sufficiency in cow's milk are 
all referred to in the Greek memorandum. 
Greece is distinguished by its distance from the surplus regions, but the situation as 
regards the level of self-sufficiency and the pressure on milk prices is similar in other 
Member States. 
20. Although the Commission considers that Greece has generally respected the conditions 
laid down by the Council for the introduction of the quota scheme and the provisional 
increase in the quota decided upon at the time can be confirmed, it is not possible at 
this stage to accept the Greek arguments for an additional increase for the following 
reasons: 
(a) Deliveries in Greece during the 1993/94 marketing year, corrected according to fat 
content, were of the order of 602 000 tonnes as against a quota of 625 985 tonnes. 
Production was therefore around 24 000 tonnes less than the quota. 
(b) According to information supplied by the Greek authorities, deliveries for the 
1994/95 marketing year were, in December 1994,12.49% below the level expected 
at that time of year. It is therefore clear that the Greek quota will not be exhausted 
during the 1994/95 marketing year. 
11 
(c) Production of cheese from cow's milk almost doubled in Greece between 1993 and 
1994, from 4 700 tonnes to 8 400 tonnes. The increase in milk production in 
Greece went, to a great extent, therefore, to cheese production and mis is one of 
the causes of the pressure on the market for drinking milk. It should however be 
noted that consumption of cheese totals 230 000 tonnes. 
Proposal 
The Commission proposes that the Council reaffirm for 1995/96 and subsequent years the 
increases in the national guaranteed quantity granted to Italy and Greece and confirm as 
quotas for deliveries the reserve of 347 701 tonnes included in the additional quantity granted 
to Italy for 1994/95. 
12 
Ehdotus 
NEUVOSTON ASETUS (EY> 
maito- ja maitotuotealan lisämaksusta 
annetun asetuksen (ETY) N:o 3950/92 
muuttamisesta 
a 
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 
When adopting, on 27 July 1994, Regulation (EC) No 1883/94 fixing the total guaranteed 
quantities for 1994/95, the Council requested the Commission to submit a report accompanied 
by proposals on whether the increase for Greece and Italy must be maintained in 1995/96 and 
subsequent years. 
Since the adoption of that Council Regulation, the EAGGF has monitored the situation in the 
two Member States very closely, carrying out several inspection visits both to the capitals and 
to regions. The EAGGF inspectors have received full cooperation during their visits. The most 
recent mission was completed on 15 February. 
The attached report and the accompanying proposals are presented pursuant to the Council's 
request and include an evaluation of Greece's request for a further increase in its total 
guaranteed quantity. 
*J 
<4-
NEUVOSTON ASETUS (EY) N:o .... 95/0096 (CNS) 
maito- ja maitotuotealan lisämaksusta 
annetun asetuksen (ETY) N:o 3950/92 muuttamisesta 
EUROOPAN UNIONIN NEUVOSTO, joka 
ottaa huomioon Euroopan yhteisön perustamissopimuksen ja erityisesti sen 43 artiklan, 
ottaa huomioon komission ehdotuksen1, 
ottaa huomioon Euroopan parlamentin lausunnon2, 
sekä katsoo, että 
Italian ja Kreikan tilanteet ovat olleet erityisen tarkastelun kohteena sen varmistamiseksi, 
voidaanko asetuksen (ETY) N:o 3950/923 3 artiklassa vahvistetun taatun kokonaismäärän 
korotukset säilyttää näiden kahden jäsenvaltion osalta jaksolla 1995/1996 ja sitä 
seuraavina vuosina; komissio on esittänyt Euroopan unionin neuvostolle ja Euroopan 
parlamentille kertomuksen maitokiintiöjärjestelmän soveltamisesta Italiassa ja Kr ei kassa4; 
komissio voi tämän kertomuksen perusteella todeta, että maitokiintiöjärjestelmän 
käyttöönottoa koskevat neuvoston edellytykset ovat kyseisten jäsenvaltioiden osalta 
kokonaisuudessaan täyttyneetja että Italia on noudattanut 347 701 tonnin varaston käyttöä 
koskevia edellytyksiä, 
ON ANTANUT TÄMÄN ASETUKSEN: 
'EYVL N.o C ...., ...., s. 
2EYVLN:oC ...., ...., s. 
3EYVL N:o L 405, 31.12.1992, s. 1. Asetus sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna 
asetuksella (EY) N:o 630/95 (EYVL N:o L 66, 23.3.1995, s. 11). 
të 
J artikla 
Muutetaan asetuksen (ETY) N:o 3950/92 3 artiklan 2 kohta seuraavasti: 
1. Poistetaan neljännen alakohdan viimeinen virke. 
2. Lisätään seuraava alakohta: 
"Vahvistetaan Italialle ja Kreikalle jaksoksi 1994/1995 myönnetty toimitusten 
kokonaismäärien korotus jakson 1995/1996 alusta." 
2 artikla 
Tämä asetus tulee voimaan seitsemäntenä päivänä sen jälkeen, kun se on julkaistu 
Euroopan yhteisöjen virallisessa lehdessä. 
Sitä sovelletaan 1 päivästä huhtikuuta 1995. 
Tämä asetus on kaikilta osiltaan velvoittava, ja sitä sovelletaan sellaisenaan kaikissa 
jäsenvaltioissa. 
Tehty Brysselissä Neuvoston puolesta 

ISSN 1024-4492 
KOM(95) 147 lopullinen 
r\i3 Ax\ J\JL JVfJ i\. M. 
FI 03 
Luettelonumero : CB-CO-95-126-FI-C 
ISBN 92-77-87211-X 
Euroopan yhteisöjen virallisten julkaisujen toimisto 
L-2985 Luxembourg