Datasets:

Modalities:
Text
Formats:
parquet
Libraries:
Datasets
pandas
License:
ianporada commited on
Commit
6f7e354
ยท
1 Parent(s): 5d5c0a5

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +81 -43
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,45 +1,83 @@
1
  ---
2
- dataset_info:
3
- features:
4
- - name: doc_id
5
- dtype: string
6
- - name: sentences
7
- list:
8
- - name: coref_info
9
- sequence: string
10
- - name: lemmas
11
- sequence: string
12
- - name: ner_types
13
- sequence: string
14
- - name: pos_tags
15
- sequence: string
16
- - name: verb_stems
17
- sequence: string
18
- - name: zero_anaphora_indices
19
- sequence: string
20
- - name: coref_chains
21
- sequence:
22
- sequence:
23
- sequence: int64
24
- splits:
25
- - name: train
26
- num_bytes: 32788818
27
- num_examples: 1345
28
- - name: validation
29
- num_bytes: 3307417
30
- num_examples: 135
31
- - name: test
32
- num_bytes: 3375766
33
- num_examples: 207
34
- download_size: 5531893
35
- dataset_size: 39472001
36
- configs:
37
- - config_name: default
38
- data_files:
39
- - split: train
40
- path: data/train-*
41
- - split: validation
42
- path: data/validation-*
43
- - split: test
44
- path: data/test-*
45
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
  ---
2
+ license: cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
  ---
4
+
5
+ # Korean Effective Crowdsourcing of Multiple Tasks (ECMT) for Comprehensive Knowledge Extraction
6
+
7
+ - Project: https://github.com/machinereading/crowdsourcing
8
+ - Data source: https://figshare.com/s/7367aeca244efae03068
9
+
10
+ ## Details
11
+
12
+ Annotated text from Korean Wikipedia and KBox (Korean DBpedia). Includes a crowd sourced training set and expert annotated (reviewed by four experts) test set.
13
+
14
+ The dataset was annotated by crowdworks in multiple stages.
15
+ * Phase I: entity mention detection annotation; candidate entity mentions are selected in a text
16
+ * Phase II: entity linking annotation; candidate mentions can be linked to a knowledge base
17
+ * Phase III: coreference annotation; entities can be linked to pronouns, demonstrative determiners, and antecedent mentions
18
+ * Phase IV: relation extraction annotation; relations between entities are annotated
19
+
20
+ ### Annotation Notes
21
+
22
+ #### Phase I
23
+ * For each mention, the annotator selects a category from one of 16 options: person, study field, theory, artifact, organization, location, civilization, event, year, time, quantity, job, animal, plant, material, and term.
24
+ * Entities can be things, concepts, ideas, or events:
25
+ ```
26
+ ๊ฐœ์ฒด๋ž€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒƒ๋“ค๊ณผ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋˜์–ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ, ๊ฐœ์ฒด๋Š” ๋ฌผ์งˆ์  ์กด์žฌ์ผ ํ•„์š”๋Š” ์—†์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฐœ๋…์  ์•„์ด๋””์–ด ํ˜น์€ ์‚ฌ๊ฑด๋„ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค ๊ฐœ์ฒด์˜ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ๋ฒ”์ฃผ์—๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ, ๋ฌผ์ฒด, ์กฐ์ง, ๊ธฐ๊ด€, ์žฅ์†Œ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ์‚ฌ๊ฑด ๋“ฑ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ๋‹ค
27
+ ```
28
+ * Compound nouns are tagged with the largest span:
29
+ ```
30
+ ๋ณตํ•ฉ๋ช…์‚ฌ์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋„“์€ ๋‹จ์œ„๋กœ ํƒœ๊น…ํ•ด์ฃผ์„ธ์š” ex) [์ƒํ•˜์ด] [๋””์ฆˆ๋‹ˆ๋žœ๋“œ] -> [์ƒํ•˜์ด ๋””์ฆˆ๋‹ˆ๋žœ๋“œ]
31
+ ```
32
+ * Final result is created by merging annotations from two separate annotators.
33
+
34
+ #### Phase II
35
+ * For each mention, a list of candidates from the knowledge base are shown. The annotator can select a candidate, not in candidate list, or not an entity.
36
+ * Each document was annotated by a single annotator.
37
+
38
+ #### Phase III
39
+ * For each mention, the annotator can select a preceding mention, no antecedent, or error. Noun phrases and pronouns are extracted using the parse information.
40
+ * "We scaled down the coreference resolution by limiting the scope of the target mentions to a named entity, pronoun, and definite noun phrase."
41
+ * Postfixes particles (์กฐ์‚ฌ) are not included in the antecedent:
42
+ ```
43
+ [์ž‘์—…๋Œ€์ƒ] ์•„๋ž˜ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์—์„œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋“ฑ์„ ์ œ์™ธ(๊ต์ •)ํ•ด ์ฃผ์„ธ์š”. ๊ทธ๋…€๋Š” -> ๊ทธ๋…€
44
+ ```
45
+
46
+ ## Citation
47
+ ```
48
+ @inproceedings{nam-etal-2020-effective,
49
+ title = "Effective Crowdsourcing of Multiple Tasks for Comprehensive Knowledge Extraction",
50
+ author = "Nam, Sangha and
51
+ Lee, Minho and
52
+ Kim, Donghwan and
53
+ Han, Kijong and
54
+ Kim, Kuntae and
55
+ Yoon, Sooji and
56
+ Kim, Eun-kyung and
57
+ Choi, Key-Sun",
58
+ editor = "Calzolari, Nicoletta and
59
+ B{\'e}chet, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric and
60
+ Blache, Philippe and
61
+ Choukri, Khalid and
62
+ Cieri, Christopher and
63
+ Declerck, Thierry and
64
+ Goggi, Sara and
65
+ Isahara, Hitoshi and
66
+ Maegaard, Bente and
67
+ Mariani, Joseph and
68
+ Mazo, H{\'e}l{\`e}ne and
69
+ Moreno, Asuncion and
70
+ Odijk, Jan and
71
+ Piperidis, Stelios",
72
+ booktitle = "Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference",
73
+ month = may,
74
+ year = "2020",
75
+ address = "Marseille, France",
76
+ publisher = "European Language Resources Association",
77
+ url = "https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.27",
78
+ pages = "212--219",
79
+ abstract = "Information extraction from unstructured texts plays a vital role in the field of natural language processing. Although there has been extensive research into each information extraction task (i.e., entity linking, coreference resolution, and relation extraction), data are not available for a continuous and coherent evaluation of all information extraction tasks in a comprehensive framework. Given that each task is performed and evaluated with a different dataset, analyzing the effect of the previous task on the next task with a single dataset throughout the information extraction process is impossible. This paper aims to propose a Korean information extraction initiative point and promote research in this field by presenting crowdsourcing data collected for four information extraction tasks from the same corpus and the training and evaluation results for each task of a state-of-the-art model. These machine learning data for Korean information extraction are the first of their kind, and there are plans to continuously increase the data volume. The test results will serve as an initiative result for each Korean information extraction task and are expected to serve as a comparison target for various studies on Korean information extraction using the data collected in this study.",
80
+ language = "English",
81
+ ISBN = "979-10-95546-34-4",
82
+ }
83
+ ```