Datasets:

breadlicker45

/

discord

like 1

dtracers#9598

04/27/2019 2:05 PM

What advantage does that have?

Jonas#2222

04/27/2019 2:06 PM

What advantages does having 'discussion' after each channel have?

Jonas#2222

04/27/2019 2:07 PM

And maybe rename: mathematics machine learning

dtracers#9598

04/27/2019 2:07 PM

Could mean memes

dtracers#9598

04/27/2019 2:08 PM

There are some places I know that have meme channels for ml and math

Jonas#2222

04/27/2019 2:08 PM

Why though? Btw the channel bundle is also called discussion

chip#7643

04/27/2019 2:11 PM

it's just redundant to have Discussion: strategy-discussion

👍 (3)

chip#7643

04/27/2019 2:12 PM

it's purely aesthetics, it's just a name

Parzival#1467

04/27/2019 4:14 PM

Allow the user to select any car's point of view, as if it were their own car

Tangil#3830

04/27/2019 4:35 PM

This is already possible with the spectator controls

chip#7643

04/27/2019 4:42 PM

sort of

chip#7643

04/27/2019 4:42 PM

it's not automatable, and the spectator controls don't actually give the same camera

chip#7643

04/30/2019 10:48 PM

make it #c instead since the sharp is right there already

👎 (2),💩 (1),😨 (1)

michael#0046

05/03/2019 11:02 AM

Let the bots know how much people are cheering for them(for the purpose of a memebot idea)

🎉 (2)

dtracers#9598

05/03/2019 5:19 PM

Make a 10-20 second display that says how to remove rendering first time game is opened

👍 (2)

ThatOtherNinja#6315

05/03/2019 5:23 PM

Might also want to add that to the faq, unless I'm blind and it is already there

👍 (2)

dtracers#9598

05/03/2019 8:02 PM

PHP

🤢 (4)

Tangil#3830

05/05/2019 3:34 PM

Creating a GameInfoState object with game_speed should warn the user that it's not currently supported

Tangil#3830

05/05/2019 5:35 PM

Trying to render something without having started the rendering should display a more understandable error

Kipje13#9878

05/05/2019 5:41 PM

same can be said for many errors in python

Kipje13#9878

05/05/2019 5:42 PM

they should be cought way earlier because its annoying to help people who have some error about a NoneType somewhere deep in a flatbuffers script

wisdom#3884

05/06/2019 8:39 AM

me got a good mod idear for rl whith psyonixs being acquired by epic if U good at editing the rl source code and mod making also good at code DM me if u like current game

❔ (2)

r0bbi3#0269

05/06/2019 8:49 AM

i think you're onto something

twobackfromtheend#1471

05/06/2019 9:00 AM

yes

wisdom#3884

05/06/2019 9:14 AM

I'll give U what me gave the guy who DM me if u won't ok

wisdom#3884

05/06/2019 9:15 AM

The idear is to create are own servers then connect them into rocket league and keep the game current state for those who want

r0bbi3#0269

05/06/2019 9:15 AM

so people can stay on an old update?

wisdom#3884

05/06/2019 9:16 AM

Well not ranked

wisdom#3884

05/06/2019 9:16 AM

Not other things

r0bbi3#0269

05/06/2019 9:16 AM

yeah

wisdom#3884

05/06/2019 9:18 AM

If we create own servers and change some rl code we can do not through lan

wisdom#3884

05/06/2019 9:18 AM

But actual servers

r0bbi3#0269

05/06/2019 9:18 AM

what's wrong with LAN?

wisdom#3884

05/06/2019 9:19 AM

U need password and user name

Kipje13#9878

05/06/2019 9:21 AM

#off-topic this channel is for suggestions only

👍 (2),👌 (1)

wisdom#3884

05/06/2019 9:21 AM

7uuuuuuu yyy

7⃣ (15)

Kipje13#9878

05/06/2019 5:40 PM

Suggestion: add a #cpp channel

smart (1),👍 (4),❤ (3),👌 (3)

Kipje13#9878

05/07/2019 10:11 AM

Suggestion: add a warning when rocket league is running without -rlbot

👍 (2),✅ (1)

Martmists#3740

05/09/2019 10:56 AM

RLBotGUI should show an error popup when a bot fails to load; this requires SetupManager to propagate or at least give us access to the error on some property, setting it to None if there was no error

dtracers#9598

05/09/2019 11:10 AM

Note that only errors before the process is created will be able to be propagated

dtracers#9598

05/10/2019 4:57 PM

give bots information on their vote score When we get custom quick chat back: `Thanks for the support!` `Vote me please! I am trying my best` `Wow I am popular!` `You don't want me?`

💯 (1)

_DaCoolOne_#6111

05/10/2019 5:11 PM

`MamaBot would be proud!`

Skyborg#0894

05/10/2019 5:50 PM

babybot nanananana babybot ananna, babybot nanananan baby bot, ...

💩 (1),🔫 (1)

r0bbi3#0269

05/11/2019 3:39 PM

separate state-setting bots from regular bots in the bot pack

Jonas#2222

05/11/2019 6:59 PM

Apartheid between bots, that's something new

chip#7643

05/13/2019 6:22 PM

Longshot: allow bots to set a sequence of inputs for the next N frames

chip#7643

05/13/2019 6:23 PM

if networked play becomes a thing, this would be a great way to combat latency issues, by allowing a bot to figure out what it should be doing for more than a single frame at a time

chip#7643

05/13/2019 6:25 PM

potential interface: instead of returning just an input, return a list of tuples [{frame1, inputs1}, {frame2, inputs2}, ... ]

dtracers#9598

05/13/2019 6:26 PM

You mean a list of flatbuffer objects. I think that currently you can push many more than the game can handle and it will do this?

chip#7643

05/13/2019 6:27 PM

it queues them up?

chip#7643

05/13/2019 6:28 PM

I'm not sure I believe it, regardless it should be changeable

chip#7643

05/13/2019 6:28 PM

next frame I may want to clear the buffer and present a new list of inputs

Simp#8258

05/13/2019 8:58 PM

If the host is running the bots tho will that be a big problem?

chip#7643

05/13/2019 8:59 PM

?

tarehart#6423

05/13/2019 9:26 PM

- We don't currently queue up player inputs in a meaningful way. They get squashed into the same frame. - Support for planned sequences has been discussed, but not in earnest. - The ideal model for LAN is to have bots talk only to their local Rocket League instance. This requires the client to spawn and run bots, which is currently not supported, but hope is alive.

👍 (2)

Martmists#3740

05/15/2019 2:28 PM

Allow auto-uploading replays to calculated.gg (default to true, togglable with a flag maybe?)

Parzival#1467

05/15/2019 2:53 PM

please not default to true, wouldn't make sense for development

michael#0046

05/15/2019 2:54 PM

how about defaults to no for streamed matches, defaults to yes for major tourneys because VOD is already a thing.

Martmists#3740

05/15/2019 2:56 PM

how will the framework detect that tho

michael#0046

05/15/2019 3:20 PM

you'd set a flag in the GUI

Martmists#3740

05/15/2019 3:20 PM

new GUI is still very WIP tho

chip#7643

05/15/2019 3:29 PM

doesn't bakkesmod already support automatic replay uploading to calc.gg?

chip#7643

05/15/2019 3:29 PM

there are many more people using bakkesmod than RLBot, so I don't see much of a point

Martmists#3740

05/15/2019 3:29 PM

not everyone has bakkesmod installed, and when linux support drops having this feature built into rlbot would be nice to have

DomNomNom#1537

05/15/2019 9:12 PM

AutoLeague has this feature

Martmists#3740

05/16/2019 3:20 AM

autoleague?

r0bbi3#0269

05/16/2019 9:15 AM

<https://github.com/DomNomNom/AutoLeague>

Martmists#3740

05/16/2019 4:53 PM

and how do I make it so this always works when I launch rlbot

Kipje13#9878

05/16/2019 4:57 PM

By asking in a more appropriate channel

smart (2)

michael#0046

05/17/2019 10:09 PM

another thing like RLBot Start to Finish; I've just noticed a lot of people making a lot of development streams and stuff and I think stuff like that can be condensed into something like RLBot Start to Finish. Its kind of like the stream highlights that were posted a while ago by da cool one

_DaCoolOne_#6111

05/18/2019 8:50 AM

Maybe add something like this to the FAQ? ```Q: Can I play in private matches with friends? A: Not at the moment, but we are potentially considering adding support for LAN play in the future.```

_DaCoolOne_#6111

05/18/2019 8:51 AM

That way ppl don't have to wonder if they can't ask

Skyborg#0894

05/18/2019 9:46 AM

good one, i added there, repharased a bit tho

_DaCoolOne_#6111

05/18/2019 10:05 AM

Thx 😃

DomNomNom#1537

05/19/2019 7:27 AM

Make the example bots auto start. I'm seeing this in the console for the Java one: `INFO:ProtoJava0[ base_java_agent.py:80 - get_extra_pids() ] Can't auto-start java because C:\Users\RLBot\Documents\GitHub\RLBotJavaExample\src\main\RLBotJavaExample\bin\RLBotJavaExample.bat is not found. Please start java manually!`

Kipje13#9878

05/19/2019 7:42 AM

its better to have your IDE start the bot process when doing dev work on your bot

Kipje13#9878

05/19/2019 7:45 AM

that has multiple advantages

Kipje13#9878

05/19/2019 7:46 AM

you can stop and start your bot from within the IDE without needing to trigger a reload in the python framework

Kipje13#9878

05/19/2019 7:46 AM

it wont cause problems when building the executable since it is not in use by the python framework

Kipje13#9878

05/19/2019 7:47 AM

you wont have to manually attach a debugger

DomNomNom#1537

05/19/2019 7:56 AM

Is this in response to my thing or a different suggestion?

Kipje13#9878

05/19/2019 7:58 AM

that was a reply to your suggestion

DomNomNom#1537

05/19/2019 7:58 AM

I frankly don't care about what's best to develop a java bot with if I'm just trying to run the bot using the GUI.

Kipje13#9878

05/19/2019 8:00 AM

the primary use of the example bot is to be a starting point to develop a bot from, not a finished bot that is supposed to be shared and automatically started by the framework

DomNomNom#1537

05/19/2019 8:01 AM

But it seems ridiculus to make it difficult to make a finished by not providing an example of the auto start behaviour in the example bot which needs autostart

DomNomNom#1537

05/19/2019 8:02 AM

Appologies if I'm a bit grumpy today.

Kipje13#9878

05/19/2019 8:05 AM

I do agree that there is a lack of documentation

Eastvillage#2628

05/19/2019 8:06 AM

I agree with Dom. The example bot should also be an example of auto start as well. But on that note; I thought it already did that work

tarehart#6423

05/19/2019 11:37 AM

Kip is right about the intent

chip#7643

05/19/2019 11:38 AM

I'm with dom here, an example should demonstrate how to get the bot to run properly too

chip#7643

05/19/2019 11:39 AM

how hard would it be to update them to be more compatible with the GUI?

tarehart#6423

05/19/2019 11:39 AM

I think the readme and video cover that

tarehart#6423

05/19/2019 11:40 AM

Packaging a Java bot for GUI consumption is just a separate step which should admittedly be better documented

chip#7643

05/19/2019 11:41 AM

I'm a little bit skeptical about trusting people to read the documentation thoroughly

chip#7643

05/19/2019 11:42 AM

we don't want example bots, we want exemplar bots 😛

chip#7643

05/19/2019 11:42 AM

people want to copy code, so let's just give them the best conventions to copy

tarehart#6423

05/19/2019 11:42 AM

The gap is not in the example bot

Kipje13#9878

05/19/2019 11:42 AM

having the example bots autostart by default will result in more questions than we currently have about how to autostart

tarehart#6423

05/19/2019 11:43 AM

It's in the overall solution for Java bots

tarehart#6423

05/19/2019 11:43 AM

There are many considerations and it's challenging