{{위키데이터 속성 추적}}
[[문학평론]]과 [[문화학|문화연구]] 분야에서 '''후기비평'''(postcritique)이란 [[비판]], [[비판 이론]], 그리고 [[ 이데올로기 적 비판 |이데올로기 비판]]의 방법들을 넘어서 읽기와 해석을 위해 새로운 형태들을 찾기위한 시도이다. 이러한 방법은 [[폴 리쾨르|폴 리쾨르에]] 의해 "[[의심의 해석학]]"으로 특징이 정의되고 또한  [[이브 세지윅]]에 의해서는 "편집증" 또는 의심스러운 읽기 스타일로 특징이 정의된다. 후기비평의 지지자들은 주장하기를 이런 읽기 방식들을 가지고 해석을 실천하는 것은 유용하고 흥미로운 결과들을 무시하는 것이 아니라고 한다.  Rita Felski 와 Elizabeth S. Anker는 비평과 후기비평(''Critique and Postcritique)이라는 책의 서문에서'' "질문, 비신화, 차별화의 지적 혹은 정치적 보상들은 더 이상 자명하지 못하다고 한다."<ref>{{서적 인용|제목=Critique and Postcritique|성=Anker & Felski|연도=2017|편집자-성=Anker & Felski|출판사=Duke University Press|위치=Durham|쪽=1|장=Introduction|isbn=978-0-8223-7304-9}}</ref> 문학적인 본문을 후기비평적으로 읽는 것은 그 대신 감정이나 애정을 강조하거나  독자안에서 다양한 [[현상]]적이며 [[미학|미학적]] 차원을 묘사하는 것이다. 어떤 때에는 그것이 읽기 과정을 통하여 얻은 철학적 통찰력을 설명하거나 본문의 형식적인 질문을 제시하거나 혼동감을 해결하기 위해 노력하는 것이다.<ref>{{서적 인용|제목=Revolution of the Ordinary|성=Moi|이름=Toril|연도=2017|출판사=University of Chicago Press|위치=Chicago|쪽=180|isbn=9780226464442}}</ref>

== 같이 보기 ==
* [[읽기|독해 (프로세스)]]

== 각주 ==
{{각주}}

== 추가 자료 ==

* Stephen Ahern (ed.), 2019. ''Affect Theory and Literary Critical Practice''. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
* Elizabeth S. Anker and Rita Felski (eds.), 2017. ''Critique and Postcritique.'' Durham: Duke University Press.
* David Couzens Hoy, 2004. ''Critical Resistance: From Poststructuralism to Post-Critique''. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
* Jeffrey R. Di Leo, 2014. ''Criticism After Critique: Aesthetics, Literature and the Political''. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
* Rita Felski, 2015. ''The Limits of Critique''. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
* Rita Felski, 2008. ''The Uses of Literature''. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
* Antoine Hennion and Line Grenier, 2000. “Sociology of Art: New Stakes in a Post-Critical Time.” In ''The International Handbook of Sociology'', ed. Stella R. Quah and Arnaud Sales. London: Sage.
* R. Jay Magill, 2007. ''Chic Ironic Bitterness''. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
* Jason Maxwell. (2019). "Coda: English Studies and the Uncertain Future." In ''The Two Cultures of English: Literature, Composition, and the Moment of Rhetoric'' (pp.&nbsp;193–202). New York: Fordham University.
* Toril Moi, 2017. ''Revolution of the Ordinary: Literary Studies After Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell''. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
* Michael Polanyi, 1974. ''Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy''. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
* Paul Ricoeur, 1970. "Freud and Philosophy." Translated by Denis Savage. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
* Alison Scott-Baumann, 2009. ''Ricoeur and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion''. New York: Continuum.
* Michael Warner, 2004. "Uncritical Reading." In ''Polemic: Critical Or Uncritical'', edited by Jane Gallop. London: Routledge, pp.&nbsp;13–38.
* Janet Wolff, 2008. ''The Aesthetics of Uncertainty''. New York: Columbia University Press.

=== 논문 ===

* Elizabeth S. Anker, 2017. "Postcritique and Social Justice," ''American Book Review'', Volume 38, Number 5, pp.&nbsp;9–10.
* Elizabeth S. Anker, 2017. "Postcritical Reading, the Lyric, and Ali Smith's ''How to be Both''," ''Diacritics'', Johns Hopkins University Press, Volume 45, Number 4, pp.&nbsp;16–42.
* Doug Battersby, 2018. "Extremely Slow and Incredibly Close: How to Read Modern American Novels," ''Journal of Modern Literature'', Indiana University Press, Volume 42, Number 1, pp.&nbsp;188–191.
* Sarah Beckwith, 2017. "Reading for our Lives," ''PMLA,'' Volume 132, Number 2, pp.&nbsp;331–336.
* Stephen Best, 2017. "''La Foi Postcritique'', on Second Thought," ''PMLA,'' Volume 132, Number 2, pp.&nbsp;337–343.
* Casper Bruun Jensen, 2014. “Experiments in Good Faith and Hopefulness: Toward a Postcritical Social Science,” ''Common Knowledge'' Volume 20, Number 2, pp.&nbsp;337–362.
* Christopher Castiglia, 2013. "Critiquiness", ''English Language Notes,'' Volume 51, Number 2. pp.: 79–85.
* Christopher Castiglia, 2016. "Revolution Is a Fiction: The Way We Read (Early American Literature) Now," ''Early American Literature'', The University of North Carolina Press, Volume 51, Number 2, pp.&nbsp;397–418.
* Mariano Croce, 2017. "Postcritique: Nothing Beyond the Actor." ''Iride, Filosofia e discussione pubblica'', Volume 2, Number 1, pp.&nbsp;323–342.
* Rita Felski, 2017. "Postcritical Reading," ''American Book Review'', Volume 38, Number 5, pp.&nbsp;4–5.
* Bruno Latour, 2004. "Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern". ''Critical Inquiry'', Volume 30: 225–48.
* Michelle M. Lazar, 2009. "Entitled to consume: postfeminist femininity and a culture of post-critique," ''Discourse & Communication'', Volume 3, Number 4, pp.&nbsp;371–400.
* Melanie Micir and Aarthi Vadde, 2018. "Obliterature: Toward an Amateur Criticism," ''Modernism/modernity'', Johns Hopkins University Press, Volume 25, Number 3, pp.&nbsp;517–549.
* Matthew Mullins, 2017. "Introduction to Focus: Postcritique," ''American Book Review'', Volume 38, Number 5, pp.&nbsp;3–4.
* Matthew Mullins, 2018. "Postcritique," in ''Bloomsbury Handbook to Literary and Cultural Theory''. Ed. Jeffrey Di Leo. Bloomsbury Academic.
* Matthew Mullins, 2017. "How Should We Read Now?" ''symploke'', Volume 25, Numbers 1-2, pp.&nbsp;485–491.
* Caitlin Smith Oyekole, 2018. "We Look Deep Down and Yet Believe," ''Leviathan'', Johns Hopkins University Press, Volume 20, Number 1, pp.&nbsp;111–114
* Bruce Robbins, 2017. "Not So Well Attached." ''PMLA'', Volume 132, Number 2, pp.&nbsp;371–376.
* Katrin Röder, 2014. "Reparative Reading, Post-structuralist Hermeneutics and T. S. Eliot’s Four Quartets." ''Anglia'', Volume 132, Number 1, pp.&nbsp;58–77.
* James Simpson, 2017. "Interrogation Over," ''PMLA,'' Volume 132, Number 2, pp.&nbsp;377–383.

== 외부 링크 ==
* [http://post45.research.yale.edu/2019/01/the-statue-and-the-veil-postcritique-in-the-age-of-trump/ Kathryn Fleishman, "동상과 베일 : 트럼프 시대의 비판 이후".] [http://post45.research.yale.edu/2019/01/the-statue-and-the-veil-postcritique-in-the-age-of-trump/ ''Post45,'' 2019 ''.'']
* [https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/are-we-postcritical/#! Matthew Mullins, "우리는 비판적인가?"] [https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/are-we-postcritical/#! ''Los Angeles Review of Books,'' 2015 ''.'']
* [https://criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu/davide_panagia_reviews_the_limits_of_critique/ Davide Panagia, Rita Felski의 ''비평 한계'' 검토.] [https://criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu/davide_panagia_reviews_the_limits_of_critique/ ''중요한 문의,'' 2018.]
* [https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/reading-bad/ 브루스 로빈스] [https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/reading-bad/ ''로스 앤젤레스 서적 검토.'' 2018.]
* [http://u.arizona.edu/~selisker/post/felskicritique/ Scott Selisker, "Felski의 ''비판 한계에 대한'' 메모" 2016년]
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwV-dIVNRKI BYU 인문 대학 리타 펠 스키와의 인터뷰, 2017.]
* [http://www.makemag.com/review-the-limits-of-critique/ Kathryn Fleishman, 2016년 ''문학 문학 잡지'' ''의 비평의 한계에 대한'' 리뷰.]
* [https://jhiblog.org/2016/11/28/ideas-of-attachment-what-the-postcritical-turn-means-for-the-history-of-ideas/ ''아이디어의 역사'' 2016 ''년의 저널의 블로그에'' ''비판의 한계의'' 다니엘 런던 검토.]
* [https://www.artsatl.org/tag/how-to-live-in-a-postcritical-world-review-of-rita-felski/ ''예술 ATL'' ''에 대한 비평의 한계에 대한'' Dan Weiskopf의 검토, 2016.]
* [https://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/people/rita-felski 리타 펠 스키 (Rita Felski), 옥스포드 대학교 강의의 "예술과 조율"팟 캐스트, 2017.]
* [https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/post-critical-reading-and-new-hegelianism Matthew Flaherty, "비판적 독해와 새로운 헤겔 리즘."] {{웨이백|url=https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/post-critical-reading-and-new-hegelianism |date=20191214003343 }} [https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/post-critical-reading-and-new-hegelianism ''아케이드'', 2015.] {{웨이백|url=https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/post-critical-reading-and-new-hegelianism |date=20191214003343 }}
* [https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/dawn-be-alive-versions-%E2%80%9Cpostcritical%E2%80%9D-1999-2015 Nathan K. Hensley, "이번 새벽에 살아남을 것 : 1999년, 2015년의 '후 임계'버전."] {{웨이백|url=https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/dawn-be-alive-versions-%E2%80%9Cpostcritical%E2%80%9D-1999-2015 |date=20191214003700 }} [https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/dawn-be-alive-versions-%E2%80%9Cpostcritical%E2%80%9D-1999-2015 ''아케이드'', 2015.] {{웨이백|url=https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/dawn-be-alive-versions-%E2%80%9Cpostcritical%E2%80%9D-1999-2015 |date=20191214003700 }}
* L [https://thepointmag.com/2015/criticism/when-nothing-is-cool isa Ruddick, "아무것도 시원하지 않습니다."] [https://thepointmag.com/2015/criticism/when-nothing-is-cool ''포인트'', 2015.]
* [https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/critique-neo-kantianism-and-literary-study 로스 크네히트 (Ross Knecht), "비판, 신관 론 및 문학 연구."] {{웨이백|url=https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/critique-neo-kantianism-and-literary-study |date=20191213232553 }} [https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/critique-neo-kantianism-and-literary-study ''아케이드'', 2016.] {{웨이백|url=https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/critique-neo-kantianism-and-literary-study |date=20191213232553 }}
* [https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/we-have-never-been-critical Dalgish Chew, "우리는 결코 비판적이지 않았습니다."] {{웨이백|url=https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/we-have-never-been-critical |date=20191214002718 }} [https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/we-have-never-been-critical ''아케이드'', 2015.] {{웨이백|url=https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/we-have-never-been-critical |date=20191214002718 }}
* [https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/suspicion-solidarity 스티븐 스 퀴브, "의심에서 연대?"] [https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/suspicion-solidarity ''아케이드,'' 2015.]
* [https://postcriticalir.wordpress.com/ Postcritical IR Research Project 웹 사이트.]
[[분류:문학 이론]]
[[분류:해석]]
[[분류:읽기]]
[[분류:문학평론]]
[[분류:철학 개념]]
[[분류:문학 개념]]