The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1840-04-10 00:00:00

NOMINAL ROLL OF OFFICERS KILLED AND WOUNDED.

Lieutenant dollinson, 37th Regiment, severely wounded ;
Ensign Hicks, Ist European Regiment, severely wounded ;
Jemadar Gunace Tewary, His Majesty's Schah Soojah's 3d
Regiment, killed.
J. R. POND, Lieutenant,
Detachment Staff.
J. ORCHARD, Lieutenant-Colonel,
Commanding Detachment.'
By order of the Right Hon. the Governor General of India
in Council, T. M. MADDOCK,

Secretary to Government of India.

(From the Bengal Hurkaru, of Feb. 13.)
The Governor-General held a levee this morning at ten
o'clock, and a large assemblage of civil, military, medical,
legal, clerical, and miscellaneous officers were honoured by
receiving a bow from his lordship. There would be no diffi-
culty in saying who were there, but it would he hard, per-
hhps, to say who were not, for Calcutta had poured out all
her " betterrnost people" into Government-house for the oc-
casion, and red coats, blue coats, black coats (legal,) black
coats (ecclesiastical,) and other coats of all sorts, were ming-
led in the presence chamber thickly and confusedly, afford-
ing every one an excellent opportunity of seeing his friends
without the trouble of calling on them. The commander-
in-chief, the members of council, the judges, the law com-
missioners, &c., as in duty bound, were all present; and his
lordship, who appeared to be in very good health, bowed for
an hour by the cathedral clock, and then withdrew from, as
he had entered, the presence chamber to the tune of " God
save the King." A company of the Cameronians, were in
attendance, as a guard of honour, ordering arms on a Mirza-
pore carpet, and presenting them amongst the chandeliers.
We observed, that some constables were present also, but
did not learn that any pockets were picked.
It gives us great pleasure to be the means of recording an
act worthy of the Bombay column of the British army of
the Indus, in which are displayed in one view, the valour,
the generosity, the highmindedness, and the ennobling spirit,
that animates the whole. All our readers are aware that the
gallant corps which stormed the fortified city of Ghuzni be-
came possessed of a magnificent sword, that belonged to
Prince Ityder Khan, the Governor. As a part of the general
prize property, the weapon was ordered to be sold by auction,
and accordingly, after due notice, it was brought to the ham-
mer on the arrival of the head quarters at Ferozepoor. The
officers of the Bombay column purchased it, and then, by
the agency of Major-General Wiltshire, commanding that
column, they presented it to their commander-in-chief, as a
most honourable tribute of their esteem, of their respect, and
of their gratitude ;—of esteem for his valour of respect for
him, who had once been their own special chief, and of gra-
titude to the general who had led them to victory, to con-
quest, and to triumph. In the letters which we subjoin are
expressed in the frank simplicity of a soldier's style, those
sentiments which do honour to all the parties.

It is worthy of notice, that a similar proceeding on the part
of certain office's in one of the colonies has lately produced
the republication of a general order from the Horse-Guards,
prohibitinr, all such demonstrations in future. It, however,
gives us pleasure to state, that the testimonial was presented
to Lord Keane before that general order was known in this
country.

COPIES OF THE CORRESPONDENCE.
To His Excellency Lieutenant-General Sir John Keane,
G.C.B. and G.C.H., Commander-in-Chief, Army of the In-
dus :—Sir,—The officers of the Bombay column of the army
of the Indus who were present at the capture of Ghuznee,
having obtained possession of the sword of the governor,
Prince Hyder Khan, have requested me to solicit your Ex-
cellency's acceptance of it, in testimony of their personal re-
gard and esteem.
I avail myself of this opportunity thus afforded me to ex-
press the great satisfaction and pride 1 feel, in having been
selected by my brother officers as the channel of conveying to
your Excellency their sentiments, in which I so deeply
participate.
I have the honour to be,
Your Excellency's most obedient,
T. WILLSHIRE, Major-General,
commanding Bombay Column Army of the Indus.
Sukhur, Feb. I, 1840.

TO MAJOR-GENERAL WILLSHIRE, AND THE OFFICERS DE-
PUTED TO PRESENT SIR .1. KEANE THE GIICZNFE
SWORD.
Gentlemen,—l beg you will believe that I receive tlis
sword as a testimonial, the most flattering and agreeable :o
my soldier's pride that could have been presented to me.
I shall ever value and hold it as a marked pledge of pur
friendly feelings towards me, and of the confidence you have
reposed in me as comrades whom I had the honour to had
from Bombay to Cabool, through a country little known,
and inhabited by uncivilised, but warlike people. Throughout
this arduous service, I was often cheered by the zealous and
spirited assistance I received from you, and those under your
orders, and that hearty co-operation and gallant bearing, I
c
unhesitatingly say, led to the accomplishment of our triwn-
pliant success, which' has gained for me the high honour n)w
am well thought of by my superiors and felbw
soldier,
on me by my Sovereign, and assures me that ai a
countrymen. .

To such distinctions my ambition always aspired, but I
could not have expected to have realised it i n Affghanistati,
and should not, in all probability, but for your able and cor-
dial assistance.
It will be painful to separate from such companions, but it
will be a pleasing reflection in the evening of lily life, to feel
that I have finished my military career as an humble servant
of the hon. company, its commander-in-chief of the Bombay
army, and that the distinguished position I have been so for-
tunate to attain, is, as a Bombay General.
With sentiments of friendly regard and esteem, I remain,
J. KEANE.
yoursu knahousi.t, faithful General, General,

DEATH OF SIR RICHARD PHILLIPS.—We have to an-
nounce the demise of this venerable knight, which took place
on Thursday last at Brighton, after a long illness, in his
year. Sir Richard was collaterally related to the late Lord
Milford, and served the office of sheriff of London in 1808_9,
He was known in the literary world as the projector, editor,
and proprietor of the Monthly Magazine, an the author of
various books connected with an improved system of cduca-
tion.—Morning Herald.

Cross-examined by Mr. MURPHY.—I could not see all
that occurred, as there was a great crowd. I was not exa-
mined before the magistrates as to these facts. Ido not
know how it is lam brought here as a witness. One of the
police told me I should be wanted. Ido not know how he
knew that I could give any information. I might have men-
tioned to somebody that I saw part of the row. I mentioned
it next day in a public.house. A fortnight since I heard for
the first time that I should be wanted. This was subsequent
to my speaking to Rylance.
James Rylance.—l am an attorney's clerk. On the night
in question I was coming down, the •street about 7 o'clock.
I saw a number of persons in the street. I went up. A man
dressed as an officer's servant ran into the Three Crowns
lobby. In about a minute he returned. Mr. Cash came
out immediately after him, and went in a direction to
the barracks. In a minute or so I saw a large number of sol-
diers in their undress uniform. Mr. Cash was with them.
They ran into the Three Crowns lobby. I did not see Mr.
Cash enter with them. He was about eight yards off. They
shouted. (Here witness imitated an Irish howl.) (Great
laughter.) One had a stick as thick as my wrist. They carne
out with somebody crying, "We have him ! We have him !"
I then saw Mr. Cash walking from the barracks towards the
Market-place. He pdssed the-Three Crowns on the opposite
side. I said to him, " Recollect, sir. I have marked You as
the ringleader of this row." He did not reply.
Cross-examined by Mr. MORPHY.—There appeared to be
two sallies of soldiers from the barracks.

John Hodgkinson.—l am a traveller to an ale and porter
house. I saw the soldiers rush into the Three Crowns. I
was in the house, and went out at the back door. I might
be a little frightened. I saw Mr. Cash in the street. He
was about ten or fifteen yards from the door of the inn. He
was in the middle of the street. I saw Rylance two or three
minutes afterwards. He asked me what was the row, and I
said it was a row with the.soldiers.

William Irving, a traveller, saw Cash with the soldiers,
after the rescue. He did not interfere to quiet the soldiers.
John Copeland.—Saw the soldiers going to the inn. I saw
Mr. Cash soon after the soldiers came out.

Rylance recalled.—Mr. Cash had a cap, I think a glazed
one, and a coat buttoned up. He had a thick stick in his
hand, with a knob the size of my fist. I think he had slip-
pers on. I cannot tell the precise kind of coat. It was gas-
light. .
William Rider, a boy, saw the soldiers come, some run-
ning and some walking. I saw John Bergen, the little
drummer, and Mr. Cash. Mr. Cash was seven or eight yards
from the inn. I knew there would be a row. I ran away to
lock up the shop, and then heard them shout, " We've got
him ! we've got him !"
Cross-examined by Mr. MURPHY.-Mr. Cash was walk-
ing. The soldiers might be going a little quicker than he.
There were some soldiers behind him as well as before.
This was the case for the prosecution.

The case against the boy Ives not pressed.
• Mr. MURPHY then addressed the jury on behalf of the
defendant Cash. These two young men belonging to an
1 honourable profession, would, if their verdict were against
them, not only be submitted to the civil consequences, but
their prospects in life must be marred ; for they would also
have a still more severe infliction to undergo—the loss of
their commissions in the army. The question to be deter-
mined was, not whether Mr. Plunkett had represented him-
self as Mr. Frazer,—that was but indulging in a natural
feeling to endeavour to save his friend from arrest,—but
whether the defendants sanctioned the interference of the
soldiers, and aided or abetted the rescue. He then proceeded
to make ingenious deductions from the evidence. The cir-
cumstance of the officers retiring to a corner of the room was
natural enough, the probability being that they were merely
speaking or whispering in private as to the means of raising
the money for their friend, so that he might be released. It
was not to be assumed that they were concocting a rescue.
Even Farnworth admitted that he thought it likely they
were conversing on the raising of the money, He then dwelt
on the insults given by the drunken landlord of the inn to
Mr. Cash, who, peculiarly sensible from his rank and station,
naturally lifted his stick, which any other man would have
done under similar aggravation. After the rescue, too, Mr.
Cash was seen in the street, walking up nobody knew where,
and altogether unconnected with the soldiers. It was not won-
derful that the soldiers, hearing that a favourite officer was
insulted and kept, as they thought, wrongfully in custody,
should in their mistaken zeal and attachment towards him,
make a rescue. This was perfectly consistent with the inno-
cence of Mr. Cash, who was not seen leading the soldiers on
or in any way aiding or abetting. He was in undress at the
time, had no command over the men, and took no active part
whatever in the rescue. A strict analysis of the whole evi-
dence led to the inference that Mr. Cash was no participator
in what was done by the soldiers.
Mr. WlLkiNs then spoke in behalf Mr. Plunkett. The
evidence went to show that many of the witnesses had shown
a disposition to pervert and exaggerate the facts. He then
alluded to the press, which had taken great pains also to
create prejudices against his client. One of the papers in
particular had given a garbled, false, and perverted account
of this affair, and had the audacity to state that it was
derived from a gentleman of high respectability in the
legal profession. This he denied. Such an account
must have been furnished by some scrub of a lawyer's
clerk, who had nothing to do. and wrote the disgrace-
ful statement for a penny a line. Never was the press
more dangerous than when thus employed in perverting the
truth ; and he trusted they would dismiss from their minds
all impressions injurious to his client that might have arisen
from the perusal of those statements. He declared his
absolute conviction that Mr. Plunkett never kicked Mrs.
Burgoyne at all. (The learned counsel here made some re-
marks relative to the alleged kick, which called forth an in-
terruption from Mr. BRANDY, who said that his learned
friend was mistaken as to the evidence of Heath on this point.
The learned JUDGE referred to his notes, and it appeared
that witness had not said that Mr. Plunkett merely lifted his
leg to keep her off, as had been stated by the defendant's
counsel—Mr. Wilkins; but that, in cross-examination,
he said " it might have been to keep her off; I think it was
a kick." Farnworth was recalled, and •examined as to
whether the kick was given by Mr. Plunkett while he lay on
the table, and in reply to the Judge said, " Half an hour in-
tervened between the time when he lay on the table and
the giving of the kick. Mr. Plunkett was standing up
at the time, within less than' a yard of Mr. Burgoyne,
and while he held the gas suspender in his hand.
He could not have held the suspender in his hand,
if he were lying on the table.") The learned counsel endea-
voured arduously to throw discredit upon the evidence of
several of the witnesses. He concurred with his learned
leorngi:g would i n
friend, that the whispering was to he construed into a con-
sultation on raising the funds, to obtain the release of their
friend. Mr. Plunkett was grossly insulted and goaded.
He concluded by pronouncing a warm ' eulogium on the
aristocracy of the land, to which his client belonged,
and to whom the consequences of a conviction would
indeed be dreadful. He belonged to one of the first
familes in the kingdom ; his name had never yet been tarnished,
and he (the learned counsel) trusted that the verdict of the
jury would leave it still untarnished.
The Learned JUDGE prefaced his summing up of the evi-
dence, by stating that the two counsel who had just ad-
dressedtnwoc
aowoeittnrnn were
altogether
entitledai t
complain
hi en reprehensible
, utindiscretion.cau hg. hadr
he
eiTtgala;hi
btki
The
etea‘ennveratdunosu 1
terms,
g,
futhis
leasihighertsot efnegtui
feelings,
ioei
certainunN
l giarsd circumstancesu. , ss
hpett
hehl
auaar
had
akshdeet
ethntoeohui
woratreadi cegsoluhi
done
clients
ornhe
nett:
does!
extremely wrong. He had deceived the sheriff's officer, the
result of which, had the deception been continued, might
have been attended with serious consequence to that in-
dividual : it might have- saddled the officer with debt
and costs. He (the learned Judge) did not, therefore, con-
sider this a case which entitled the parties to take the high
ground which had been assumed. With regard to Farnworth
irritating Mr. Plunkett or behaving uncivilly towards him,
the opposite conduct was his own interest, and he neither
knew Mr. Plunkett nor entertained any animosity towards
him. He made these remarks in justice to thewitnesses, as so
high a ground had been taken in the defence. His lordship
then said, the jury would first have to consider whether the
defendants had aided or abetted the soldiers ; and next, whe-
ther they had committed the assaults charged against them
as having been committed on Farnworth and Mr. and Mrs.
dßeunrugeo,yne.
commentingl-lis l lordship dusphoinp
it then
hcarefully e d
.summedw i
With
hpr
reference
eenvei
e-
tt
the
thee
defenceofficers notset
u pa
,t
theyfirs t
(orderingtheub
e.
jury) were
nsoldiersd ae seugnosao:dvl
.a away,
u,Tdahgnee anddys
of military affairs as either of
thetentitearytdaoineki-fooopsinei,otat thatfe
w onemil e osftdsotoils:
ae--
obr order dis-
tant,—they ae n could
at
c,
—ii not' defendants,tnheeny fora
beinghq at l
had moment
therefore, ei
denat
diers to go. Had they been so ordered, they
this kind
.
undress,oo andpo%tvheer otherto,
halaldpbreoebnabailoitnye haveuntil datispeerrstehde;
rescue.
tuenothpiniug
power to order them home, and might havneleditottnhhelasdooktilh:edt

This was a cause in which the validity of a will made by a
deceased lady in the neighbourhood of Ormskirk, was dis-
puted by her surviving sister. Messrs. Cresswell, Alexander,
Wightman and League appeared for the plaintiff; and for
the defendant Sir W. Follett (who came down on a special
retainer), Mr. Watson, and the Hon. J. S. Wortley.
After a long consultation between the learned counsel,
Sir WILLIAM FoLLETT rose to address the court and jury.
In this case he had the honour to appear before them as
counsel for the defendant, Mr. Robert Waring, of Ormskirk,
in this county. If this cause had gone on, and the jury had
been called upon to investigate the evidence, it would still have
been his duty to address them first for defendant, be-
cause he should have admitted at once the title of the heir
at law; for whom his learned friend Mr. Cresswell appeared,
although he insisted the defendant had a right to the estate
under a will devising that estate to Mr. Robert Waring. But
he was happy now to say that an inquiry, which might have
lasted some time, and have occupied the jury in that box
some hours, was not likely, now, to be necessary ; and he
had risen for the purpose of telling them what was the nature
of the case in which they had succeeded in making this
arrangement. The action was brought by Miss Segar, an
elderly unmarried lady, now considerably advanced in years,
for the purpose of recovering a small estate devised by her
sister, the late Mrs. Molyneux, to the defendant Mr. Robert
Waring. Mr. Robt. Waring and his father were attorneys at
Ormskirk, and he believed he might say that Mr. Waring the
father, and Mr. Robt. Waring the son, were persons of the
highest character in the neighourhood, and that they both
stood very high in the profession. The case was of far more
importance to Mr. Robert Waring, from some supposed
charge made against him because Mrs. Molyneux had cho-
sen to devise to him a considerable part of her property,
than from the value of the property itself. The property
was not very considerable. The estates in question were
small; but Mr. Waring could not bear in a state where any-
thying like suspicion rested upon him with regard to the will
of the testatrix. It was understood upon the part of the
plaintiff,- Mrs. Segar, that she, being disappointed at not
receiving so large a bequest under the will of her sister as
she expected, thought tit to institute legal proceedings for
the purpose of ascertaining whether or not, at the time the
will was executed, Mrs. Molyneux was competent to execute
it. Under the will, Mrs. Molyneux had devised her estates
in this way : a small portion of land was left to Mrs. Segar ;
another estate, which was the subject matter of this action,
to the defendant, Mr. Robert Waring; another estate to a
brother of his ; another to a third brother; the sum of £l,OOO
to the Liverpool Blue Coat Hospital ; £2,000 to Miss Jane
Segar; another legacy to Mr., Lax, a medical man who had
attended her for a great number of years ; and another to Mr.
Boyer, the agent and manager of the property of Lord Skci-
mersdale. The deceased lady had' a personal estate amount-
ing to between £4,000 and £5,000. The residue of
,the pro-
perty she left to her executors, Mr. Boyer and Mr. Robert
`Waring' not for their own advantage, but in trust to be dis-
tributed to the poor of the parish of Ormskirk. The part of the
will quarrelled with by Mrs. Segar, was the part relating to Mr.
Robt. Waring. With Mr. Waring's family Mrs. Molyneux was
on terms of the greatest intimacy ; his father had managed her
property for many years, and through his management it had
considerably accumulated. The greater part of it, however,
she had derived under the will of her late aunt, Mrs. Crane ;
and as he (the learned counsel) had already stated, for a con-
siderable period she derived accumulations by savings made
during the time it was under the management of Mr. Waring.
The real propefty amounted to about £lO,OOO, and the per-
sonal property to about £5OOO. After the death of Mr.
William Waring, Mrs. Molyneux was on terms of intimacy
with Mr. Robert Waring, but with her own sister, Mrs.
Segar, she was, unfortunately, not on terms. She had de-
vised no property which she received from her father's
family ; the property which she had frorn,her father was left
to her for life, and at her death it went to Mrs. Segar. So
Mrs. Segar derived all the property of her father, and she
had a considerable income herself. There was every reason
to suppose that Mrs. Molyneux would have selected some
person—indeed, if the case had gone on, he should have been
able to prove that she,had repeatedly said it was not her in-
tention to leave the property to her sister, but toother persons;
and she had left it in the way described. His learned friend (Mr.
Cresswell) had been instructed by. Mrs. Waring to contest
the competency and the capability of the testatrix to make
this will ; but he (Sir Wm. Follett) believed there would now
be no attempt to dispute the will upon that ground. He (Sir
Wm. Follett) ought, however, to state, that Mr. Waring,
feeling the position in which Mrs. Segar was placed, as being
sister and heir-at-law to the deceased, held her justified in
making inquiries into the validity of the will, and in insti-
tuting these proceedings. Mr. Waring was anxious that no
expense should fall upon her, therefore, and had consented
that the matter should be disposed of as if it had been in
cnother court. If it had been litigated before the ecclesias-
tical courts, and in due course taken before the Privy Conn-
ail, the costs would come out of the estate, and not from the
parties proceeding. Mr. Waring, however, wished that no
expense should fall upon Mrs. Segar ; he consented that
she should be at no expense at all. Of course he did not
mean to call upon the parties interested in the charitable
part of the property to take any part of the costs ; but as for
that part of the property which had been given to the benefi-
cial interest of Mr. Waring and his family, he was satisfied
the matter should be disposed of exactly as in the Ecclesias-
tical Courts.

Mr. CRESSWELL said he appeared for the plaintiff. Un-
doubtedly he had.no desire to say one syllable reflecting at
all upon the character of Mr. Waring. His learned friend
had already stated some circumstances which had induced
the plaintiff to institute this investigation; and there were
one or two others which he (Mr. Cresswell) desired to state
on behalf of that lady. Mrs. Segar and her sister un-
fortunately were not on familiar or intimate terms for
some time before Mrs. Molyneux's death. Mrs. Molyneux
was a person of great eccentricity ; she was very singular
in some of her habits, and among others, she had a con-
stant desire to maintain a delusion in the minds of those
about her, as to the parties who were ultimately to benefit
by the disposal of her property. It was true she stated
sometimes that she did not mean to leave her sister anything;
but she had, quite as frequently, and in the presence of quite
as respectable persons, stated that she did not mean Mr.
Waring to have it. He (Mr. Cresswell) believed, from its
being known that Mr. Waring was Mrs. Molyneux's confi-
dential adviser, that rumours had spread that he would be-
nefit by her property, though, as if for the puspose.of keeping
people in the dark, she continually stated that Mr. Waring
should never have a farthing. The lady died. The will was
made out long before her deaths, and it was natural, under
these circumstances, that rurcour should be. busy. We
all knew that when a rumour was once started, and fa-
miliarly repeated, it acquired many additions and exag-
gerations, till a suspicion, entirely unfounded, attach-
ed where it ought not. Thus it was Mrs. Segar was
lead to institute this inquiry. Persons came forward to give
information of this or that, which was very much the crea-
tion of their own brain, so parties were frequently misled,
and they fell into a false position. It was only after a
scrupulous and accurate investigation of the evidence which
was to have been brought before the jury in explanation and
in proof of the case; when this mass of evidence was placed
before him, being a grave case, on the one hand imputing to
a respectable gentleman misconduct in the preparation of a
will ; and on the other hand, the consideration that an
elderly lady was not to be benefitted by the property of her
deceased sister; he investigated it with great care, and ex-
ercising the best judgment he could upon it, and having
formed his own opinion, he had requested Mrs. Segar to
allow hercounsel tojudge for her. He would at once say he had
no ground for establishing a charge ofanything like misconduct
against Mr. Waring, and having that feeling he considered
that to obtain a verdict would be out of the question. A
communication therefore had been brought about between
his learned friend and himself, and they had come to this
conclusion, with which he hoped Mrs. Segar would be satis-
fied. A verdict therefore would now pass for the defendant.

The JUDGE said it must be satisfactory to the jury, that
their cause had concluded in a manner so creditable to the
parties. Nothing could be. fairer than the statements made
by the learned counsel, and the jury therefore could have no
difficulty in giving a verdict for the defendant.
A verdict was then returned for the defendant.

LIVERPOOL CORN EXCHANGE, THIS DAY

In addition to the large arrivals, specified in our circular of
the 7th instant, a liberal supply of Wheat has come to hand
since, consisting of 2171 qrs. from Ireland, 2233 Coastwise,
7448 from the Continental ports of Europe, and 2265 qrs.
from the American States, forming together 14117 qrs., with
8157 barrels of Flour from Baltimore and Virginia.

Of Barley and other Grain, the supply fresh in for to-day
is only moderate, and of Irish Flour and Oatmeal trivial.

Influenced by the favourable state of the weather, the
probability of a lower duty on Wheat, and the prospect of
further imports from abroad, the millers and dealers have
remained very inactive, and speculative buyers so much more
on the reserve than heretofore, that in any branch of the
corn trade, from the close of Tuesday's market up to this
date, we have had little appearance of business, but without
inducing holders to press sales below the reduced terms last
noted.

By the average return received this morning, the anticipated
decline in duties on Wheat and Flour is confirmed, the for-
mer being 16s. Bd. per quarter, and the latter 10s. Old. per
barrel, for the ensuing week, remaining upon all other foreign
produce unvaried.
At our Corn Exchange tq-day the Wheat trade was gene-
rally depressed about 2d. to 3d. per 70 lbs. from the current
prices of Tuesday, and although good and fair descriptions
were rather more saleable, no extensive progress could be
made at this abatement. English and Irish Flour continued
nearly without inquiry ; and the transactions in foreign were
upon a moderate scale merely to consumers, United States
in bond obtaining 28s. 6d., and duty paid 395. to 40s. per
barrel.

Malting Barley, in consequence of the advanced period of
the season, was 2s. per quarter cheaper, and some parcels
of Foreign were forced off for grinding at a similar decline.
—Malt and Peas ruled dull, at the late prices.—Beans„upon
a limited supply, were in tolerable request, at a slight im-
provement in value.
Oats, at a reduction of id. to Id. per 45 lbs. from our last
quotations, appeared to meet rather more attention, but by
no means a lively demand.

Oatmeal, although neglected, continued to be held on the
terms of this day se'nnight.

SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE.

FRIDAY, APRIL 10.—Wind S.S.E.
A RRlVEu.—Mauney, Downes, from Lisbon—Thetis, Brown, for
Savannah.
Sank:D.—lndependent, Morris, for Quebec—Nancy, Wilson, for
Newfoundland—Belinda, M'Neile, for M ontreal—M elina, Butler;
Nile, Ferguson, and William IV, Cleat!, for Newfoundland—Fero-
nia„ Jarvis, for Oporto—Ben. Morgan, Johnson, for Charleston—
Caledonia, Marricot, and Pharsalia, Winsor, for New Orleans—
Lucy, Murphy, and Russia, Elliot, for Mobile—Napier. Sandford,
for Philadelphia—Neptunus, Bakker, for Rotterdam—Daniel, Ma-
thews, for Gibraltar—Hope, Sheridan, for Newfoundland—Lady
Harvey, Alexander, for Bay Chaleur.

Dido, Holmes, from Bonny for this port, was spoken 13th March,
in lat. 28, long. 38
Mary Wylie, Miller, from Puerto Cabello, at Laguira
Isabel, Shaw, hence at Antigua
13Iackaller, Cochrane, hence at Trinidad
Victoria, Oliver, hence at Monte Video
Vestal, -. sailed from Monte Video for Liverpool 14th Jan.
Sally, How, hence at Alexandria
Judith, White, from Islay at Callao, and sailed 24th December for
Intermedios

Susannah Collings, White, sailed from Callao for Valparaiso 19th
December
Patriot, Sawbridge ; Emilia, Milory ; and Mary and Jane, Osborn,
hence, at Naples
Lady Emily, Wilson, hence and Malta, at Smyrna
Zuleika, Scott, sailed from Smyrna' 10th March; Friendship,
Gray, 19th ; and Columbian Packet, White, 21st, all for this port

VESSELS ENTERED FOR LOADING.

(SINCE OUR LAST PUBLICATION.)

EAST INDIES, CAPE OF GOOD HOPE, &c.
Thomas Sparks, J Sparks, 497 Calcutta, Cotesworth & Wynne
Corinna, H Wilmot, 324 Cape of Good Hope, Bold & Starkey
Devon, J Gething, 400 Sincapore, W & J Tyrer