The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1849-05-15 00:00:00

Mr. J:l4.lloDsoN
Mr. J. G

Is said

y were ie

d to the late water

The motion was then carried.
Mr. PROCTER then moved that the quantity of water distri-
buted from these stations may be estimated at 4,000,000 gallons
per day ; but that a further supply of from 2 to 3,0°0.000 iallons

HS, and a further supply
the wants of the town.

ssary to satisfy

iippeaf to be derive(
is immediately necet
Mr. FERGUSON seconded the motion_
Mr. Nicol. said the statement respecting the private
in the town had nothing whatever to do with the qv
They could not take water which belonged to private pa.-
Mr. H. HORNET thought it of very little importance. Tim
main question was whether a further supply was needed or not.
The MAYOR sukgested that that portion might be struck out
Mr. PROCTER thought it was of importance to state tha
there was a private supply. If the peo -
private sources, they would not

plied frc

Consequently the public supply might be so far diminished.
To obtain this information, he knew a great deal of trouble had
been taken.

r. R. C. GA RDNER wished to observe that it they were to
h other

town.
The 3

Green-lane

nd tool

art of the question which relates to th,

duplicate engine has been already 'disposed of.
Mr. GARDNER said he was not aware that such was the fact,
but if that were so, he was most happy to hear of it, inasmuch
as it was calculated to effect
shot

Mr. BENNET: w tne words being struck out
If it could be proved that there would be eight or nine million:

r. TYRER said, if one ma
quired for the whole public
plying the town
supply

.d a quarter of what was re-
had nothing to do with sup-
They could not deprive a party of his private

Mr. JAMES LAWRENCE sal
Bent had a very good priv

el, he understood I

.e well, so had IV

friend Mr
S. Holme

n gallons and they

Mr. TnomsoN said it would not have to t
public body. _ _ _

pplied to the

Mr. HAituoun said if he could believe that the 4,0"0,e(
gallons had been honestly distributed, he should differ in toi
from the resolution; but he believed that a great portion ha
been wasted by bad management and bad nines. He rupnrt

.nrdity never wa!
xi bee'

quantity raised from the wells.
Mr. J. G. Monnis thought n greater
per;►etrated than to assert that 50 per cent. et water
wasted.
Mr. COOPEF
resolution.

id if that were so, he must disagree with the

The MAYOR then put the question, and it n•as carried

unanimously

Alder Mall PROCTER a
opinion that additional
extent, by improving and extendir

ain rose and moved
supplies niav be

" That it is our

we do not' consider such improveme
able or necessary, except at Green-I
page 52 of the Report, they would
improvements were set down at
tes set forth that it was at present
improvements at any of the station

would merely r

,ve the res.

tained, to some

istons
pnyliK "

unadvisableS:o make Um
s, except Green Lane, 1:

4-1 seconding th

Mr. R. C. GARDNER felt great pleasure.
motion just proposed by Alderman Procter.
Mr. num'. understood that by this resolution, the
Council did not bind themselves to do 7,- nnv of 0'
engines, whether at Green Lane or a'
He hoped that the Council were not
money on any of the

biog.
by of the (

e resolution on which the tug will (
negatived, it matters but little whethe. you
or uot.

will not affect the marl

not go on?

Alderman PROCTF

.; and if it be
nt to this one

Pike shall or steal.

Certainly not