The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1841-09-03 00:00:00

;in of it, are pointed out with the irresist-
h, and the movements of " the re-

ible weapon of na

bilious x

ted with becoming sarcasm and power-
The End of the Beginning" is a clear and
limes which have induced the people
of this country to hurl from the eminence to which it had
very men whom that same people had
selected to adorn that eminence, and to whom, with some
brief intervals, it had intrusted the reins of power for more

ful railler

faithful analysis o

I them

Following this we have Part the

First, of a
Country,"

say, howeve

a for t

Journal of an Autumn in the

s already known of " rustic con-
at epochs." We need scarcely
is much besides what we have

the gr

ijoyment and instruction of the

We give two extracts in our present number, from

Charles O'Malley

ave alluded

Harry Lorrequer. Webb,

Liverpool

Phis number is a most agreeable and spirited one. In it
red with glory and entertained by
Captain O'Malley returns to his uncle's, aocom-

we find the hero

the Bristol Editor

we reg

Dugdale

I all ou!

the old Barons Aud
mediate founder of

William Audl

Lacey Free. Mickey's interview with
ughable, but improbable. This work,
approaching to completion. It will

1. It is the most lively story

•e, as usual, very good

STANLEY FAMILY

is of early baronial origin. Camden,
tiquaries agree that it is a branch of
of Audeley, co., Stafford. The im-

Stanley., was

ho lived in the reign of King John,
Sir Adam de Audleigh, the manor of

his abode, he assumed the surname
igh, or Stanley. The great-great-grandson of this

and had f
Stanleifih, where fix
of St _
William, wa

Sir William de Stanley, who married Joan, eldest daughter
of Sir Philip de Bamville, Lord of Stourton, in Cheshire, by
which marriage Stourton not only came into the family and
has since remained in it, but also, by the same alliance, the
family became possessed of the manor and bailiwick of Wyrall
Forest, and thereupon assumed the armorial bearings since
used by his descendants, in place of those borne by his

ancestors.
Sir William Stanley, Lord of Stanley, Great Stourton,
,s his grandson; and from a younger brother of
ended the Stanleys of Cumberland.
Sir William Stanley, &c., the eldest son of the above,
married Margaret, daughter and heiress of William Hooton,
of Hooton, and thus brought the Hooton property into the
family,—which, together with the lordships previously pos-
sessed, have continued to be possessed ever since by it in
lineal descent. The second son of this Sir William, namely,
Sir John Stanley, K. G., who married the daughter and
heiress of Sir Thomas Latham, Knight, of Latham and
Knowsley, county of Lancaster, is the ancestor of the Earls
of Derby, the Stanleys of Alderley, &c. &c.
The present baronetcy of the Hooton Stauleys was created
on the 17 June, 1662, the first baronet being Sir William
Stanley, of Hooton, and the following are the persons who
have held it :

&c.
his, desc

Sir William.
—Sir Rowland, his son.
—Sir William, his son

IV.—Sir Rowland, his son.
V.—Sir William, his son (died without issue).
Vl.—Sir John, uncle to the last baronet, who assumed
the additional surname of Massey, under the will of
the younger son of the third baronet, and also the ad-
ditional surname of Stanley, under the will of the last