The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1836-04-05 00:00:00

THE LIVERPOOL.STANDARD:.

and costs, amounting td E2l. When the officer wept to put the
execution into effect, .he was met by .;auses, who said, "this
execution is against Joshua, all these goods are mine, Joshua
has nothing to do with them." The jury having before dis-
believed, ,James, the. officer concluded he was justified in doing
the same. the officer replied " yes; and if the executidn had
been against you, phi would have said the property belongs to
Joshua." He cont coded that it. was a fraudulent transaction,
in. order to render the verdict .Ilr. Cotterill had obtained,
futi,e. The .horses were sold by pubic auction, of Which hatid,
bids were posted. One had been sold for Ed 18s., which the
brother Joseph, who ;ittendedrt he sale, bought. An dnn doubt,
if any or the horses hid been going below their value be would
have boughtthem. It was fair to presume that they fetched. as
_much as they were Worth. Another of the horses had been sold
for £5 10s.; another fur 165., and the fourth for £2 Ws.; 'thus,
not selling for the amount of the.debt which it was the interest
of the auctioner to get. A person named Heaton, had some
time before repaired One; of the waggons, and had been obliged
to seize the waggon for payment: The name on the waggon
when, seized was Joshua 'Farrar, on turning the plate James
Farrar, was on the other side: This circumstance corroborated
his statement, that the brothers were united together to de-
fraud. He called .

. John Clcasley, who deposed to.ibeing in the employment of
Mr. Cotterid, and meeting James Farrar, who ordered the
hay, and.he delivered it to Joshua, who said it was right. They
could not get paid fur the hay, and brought an action against
Joshua for the 'amount, and James was examined as a witness,
and said Joshua had nothing to tlo with it, that al,l was his pro-
perty. Mr. Cotterill, however, succeeded. in his action.
Richard Cleasley corroborated this statement.
Joseph Dunwell deposed to Farrar and Co. being. over the
dtior of•Farrar's office.

Wiliam Heaton deposed to his father being a wheelwright,
and having repaired the 'waggon to the amount of £5, which
they could not get paid. They took the waggon in execution in
cons (pence in March, 183.3. Joshua was then on the waggon;
James's name had always been so before.,-Cross. examined: had
seen James and Joseph Farrar on the waggon, but *never before
saw Joshua's dame on the waggon.

William 1-lailcoelt„ follower. depsed to. seizing the
waggon in March,, IS:33,:aud finding Joshua's name on it ; on
taking the plate off he found James's name ou the other side.
Several other witnesses were examined, who corroborated
these statements. •

Mr. CRESS WELL replied at great length. He-contended that
it was absurd to suppose that change of name on the waggon
was done for the purpose of defrauding creditors; for what were
the circumstancos? Au execution had been &dallied- against
Joshua, and they changed James's name on. the the wagon
from James to Joshua, as if to get the waggon taken in execu-
tion. There could be no credence given to the witness's state-
Helstsoildienled the idea of the norses being sold for
their full value. One had been sold for 16s. cit was' worth
more than that for its shoes and doe's meat.

Th, JUDGE summed up. It would be for the jury to consider
whether a joint interest existed amongst the parties or not. In
case they found their verdict for the plaintiff tl►ey must find the
value of the horses. If they found that Jones anti Joshua were
partners, they would find a verdict of one-half the value for the
plaintiff; if they faund 'ail three brothers in partnership they
would give one-third the value-of the h•+rses to the plaintiff.
The jury foOnd Joshua aud James Farrar to be in partnership
in equal inoities ; and found the valuealfs the horses he £3O.
Verdict for the plaiut 111 £ls. Thiarcase occupied nearly four
hours.

SHARRocK V. LATDOM AND ANOTHEIi
The plaintiff's in this ease were nonsuited.
EDGED P. I.IpIRDT.

The plaintiff in this case consented to the withdrawal of a
uror.
PAnxe.e v. ROTHWELL.
The plaintiff in this case consented to refer the case to arbi-
tration.
.tux.ws, V. HA NT.
Mr. BRANDT appeared for the prosecution, and Mr. Win 11T^
MAN and Mr. ALEX AN DER for the defence.
The plaintiff in this case is. a stationer at Norwich, and
sought to recover the suin of £5O alledged to be due to him by
defendant, whd is a jeweller. residing at Manchester.
Defendant pleaded a set off of £4B for goods sold and money
lent.
Mr. A4y.AtiDl,:it, for the defendant, proceeded to show the
set off— 1831, On the 27th of January, defendant was at
Yarmouth, and the plaintiff there, having known him pre-
viouslY, sold to him a musical snuff-box. a pearl broach,
and a diamond ring-. naintiff then asked him to lend him £lB
which he did do. He also sold him four gross of pencils, and
four ()Toss of steel pens : at amount due for all which amounted
to £4B 10s., WhiCh was the set off: He called
John Wright; who deposed to defendant being a dealer in
miscellaneous. articles, and living at Manchester. He saw
plaintiff at Yarmouth at the beginning of 1833; defendant was
also present. Defendant sold plaintiff a musical, box for £4.
He also sold him a diarnond ring for £5, is. 0., and a pearl
broach for £3 10s. 0. Plaintiff then requested a loan of de-
fendant of £lB which 'defendant lent bins. Plaintiff also or-
dered four gross of bkck lead pencils at 6d. per dozen, which
amounted to £l4 Bs. U. A quantity of steel pens were also
tfeiffapitrittv ofe travelled for
Burn,
ordered at 12s. :5 gross. He was in the employment of the de-
ndfn
or t y
aaniine cwas made to plain-
gether £4B lOs. Od.. at Nor-
wich in August last. He left him his account and called on
him several times for the money. lie said ho was sorry he was
nut then able to pay him; but that he would call on Mr. Hart
in Manchester, whilst he was on his journey and pay him.
Cross-examined by Mi. BRAN ow. Defendant did not carry
a pack or a bag; he conveyed his goods about by coach. Mr.
Hart had no stated residence.
Mr. Henr
Yy_armouth at the tine, when the plaintiff bought
• Hart, the brother of defendant, deposed to being
preSent at
those, things
,and borrowed the money of his brother. He also
sold „;Doris for his brother, The whole sum due to his brother
heard the order given for the pencils and the pens. He also
amounted to £1;?, Ids. He had applied for that sum several
times without success..
•
Mr. BRAN DT. in defence said, though he did not expect it in
the first instance. yet be should be able to prove an alibi, and
Show that on thatrlay, th 4 27th of January, 1&31. the plaintiff
itistead of being at-Yarmotrth was at his own house at Norwich.
He called

Edward Adams,- who deposed to Mr. Junguis being at Nor-
on thoi.27th of Jannary, .031, antl.lhAt be_tlavith
.hint
nearly all the day. He remembered that day because Mr;Vi-
ning, a ear, from London was engaged at the Theatre, and he
went to see him. On that very day the plaintiff was removing
from one house to another, and he assisted him to remove his
goods anti went "star gazing" at night with him. Ile was with
him all day and he certainly had not time to go to Yarmouth
and.back, a dista.!..e of Seventeen miles without his knowing.
• Cross-examined by Mr. ALEXANDER. He had been in diffi-
culties, and had been obliged to ma/brace the insolvent act. It
was far from a "cordial embrace" on his part.. He came in
contact with that einbrace sometime in June' '3l. He hint asked
Mr.- Hart fur money and had been refused. Since his insol-
'venev he had been living in Norwich, in the employment of Mr
JOsePh Bridwell as a landscape painter.
Mr. Joseph Bridwell deposed to hearing Bright, 7n-
ing, ask "which was Junguis?" (the plaintiff). when he fgdain-
tiff ) and another was passing.
Cross-examined.—lie gave last witness ahnni" Idi.`a Week
whilst in his employment. -He carried ,orr-the--trade--of a-ropper-
plate printer.
Henry Hart recalled by the JUDGE.—The.iiinotAdue-to his
brother was £lB 10s. He did not believe thaKalitrl was any
money owing to the plaintiff by his brother. 13 ode' ,
Mr. ALEXANDER, in replying, said it was impßsl4l4ol' 100 K
on this ease in one view without perceiving gross ' and Val Iper-
jury. It was impossible to believe the plaintifrs—witneises.
How did one man remember the precise day that the;qpkrptiff
was said to be at Yarmouth, when he (witness) stated he' was
in Norwich? Why by seeing a "star" at the Theatre at the
very time, when, from his own evidence he was in difficulties,
and not likely-to attend such a place. If this gave a verdict to
plaintiff, they must stamp defendant's witnesses with the ktoss•.
est perjury.
The JurtGE in summing lip said if they disbelieved the de-
fendant they must also disbelieve his two witnesses. The ere-
dihilitv of all hunk together.
The jury alter -turning round a short time in their box re_
turned a verdict for the defendant.
The Court-adjourned at seven o'clock till nine o'clock nex
morning.

CROWN COURT.—SATURDAY.
The JeDGE took his scat this morning at nine o'clock.
UTTERING COUNTERFEIT COIN.

George Ca Bridpetralligan, (29) and Peter Brown,
(37) were ch4r,red with having on the tith of October last coun-
terfeited two sixpences. •
Mr. Amusreomu and Sergeant ATCFMRLEY appeared on the
part of the crown, awl Mr. \VILKINS defended Geo. Calligan.
Mr. Sergeant ATCHEItLEY, in opening the case, said the pri-
soners were charged with counterfeiting some silver money.
For reasons which occurred one of the police-officers of Liver-
pool went to a place called Fir-place. They found the dour of
the house they went to fast. On effecting an entrance they
found the three prisoners at the bar in the room. In the first
place they found two good sixpences, and afterwards found
some counterfeit sixpences. They alsti found a pipe and a plaster
of paris cast, and some metal in the act of being.inelted, to-
gether with a knife and a file. There was one sixpence pre-
pared, and another partly so. Geo. Calligan was seen In the
act of destroying a mould, and a woman was concerned in the
casting; the other prisoner ran away, and on being taken said
he had only been there a few 'minutes, and was no way con-
cerned. They would judge from the evidence whether all the
parties were 'concerned.
James Halsal, constable, deposed to entering the house, and
finding a cup containiwz some metal, a pipe, some melted me-
tal which had run amongst the cinders, and 'a plaster of paris
cast. ”-•

James'Ainsworth. constable, deposed to Brown running away,
and being stopped'.o one of his assistants. He said he had
not been there above one or two minutes, and had gone to bor
row it fork. He mig.it not have been there long; he did not
know.

Cross-examined.—He did not know that Calligan had been
there long.
Mr. Parlour deposed to ordering the officers to go the house.
He produced what he had received from the officers, two bad
sixpences, one partly finished, and the other completely so. He
also produced-the fragments of.a mould and a cup with metal
in it wlfich had been in a state of fusion.

Edward Joseph Powell.—ls inspector to his Majesty's mint;
bad been so for some years. Plaster of paris was used in cast-
ing. There was a portion of a plaster of paris mould contain-
ing the impression of the obverse side of a sixpence.
~There
were two counterfeit sixpences in a different state of prepara-
tion ; they both appeared from the same mould. The tobacco,
pipe contained sonic white metal, the same as the SixpeticeS:
The metal was tin antimony and zinc, comn.only called Britr.
tania metal. The metal was of very tittle worth. There was
some plaster of parts which was necessary to make a mould.
There Were two good sixpences, one of whiCh he believed to
have been used in making the mould.
This was the case for the Prosecution.•
The prisoner, Bridget 'Calligan, put in a written defence,
which. was read, and in which she statea that the only way in
which she could account for the articles being found was a wo-
man of bad character haying been allowed to enter her room
withouther knowledge, who thust have left them there.
The J uG F., in sutiiming up. said the evidence against Peter
Brown was not suffleient. tle might not have been in the
room above a minute

The jury found Bridget and George Culligan Guilty, and aez
quitted Peter Brown.
The oiurt sentenced them to be transported for life.

"UTTERING COUNTERFEIT COIN.

Michael Casey, (20) Patrick Higgins, (20) Charles Connor,
(33) and Bridget Connor, (50) wet e charged with having cnun,
terfetted 31 pieces of coin in the similitude of a Is.
Mr. ARMSTRONG and Sergeant ATCXIER.LEY appeared on the
part of the cr.iw u.
Ha 14.1, the police-4fficer, deposed In going into a cellar in
Addison-street. On the morning or the Ist of January last,
and finding the four prisoners with a quantity of heated grit.
tania inetat, a cap, and a plaster of parts east.
At this stage the clerk of the court stated that there was a
flaw in the indichnent, the word "coin" being omitted, there
being Only "ctinnterfeit," instead of "counterfeit coin."
The-Juntw said 'his waSlittal to the iticiletiOnt.
Sergeatit ATcnitui.-tve said he should' On the part of the

attorney-greneral, enter a vzori proi on, that indictment. The
pr,'soners were- therefore acquitted on this count. •
Mr. Sergeant ATCHKRLEY said there Was another indictment
charging- them With' having in their possession a.plaster ofparis
Mould for th 4 purpose of counterfeiting shillings.
lialsat again went over the evidence, and deposed to finding
the atould.•

Win. Parkinson, constable, corroborated this statement. One
of the prisoners, Charles Connor, was 'laying on a bell in the
room, and in the lied he found a checked hag cotitaining33coun-
terfeit shillings which he delivered to Ainsti'orth the constable,
who gave it to Mr. Parlour. , rs
Two witnesses were caned, who deposed to,.the two Conno n
having taken the cellar, and to Higgins being frequently see
there.

Mr. Parlour produced the counterfeit Shillings and a mould.
Mr. Powell, inspector to the mint, deposed to the mould being,
the mould of a shilling, and that the shillings were counterfeit
and cast in the mould.

This Was the case for the prosecution.
The prisoners each put in a written defence, and Conner
called a witness to give him a good character, and his daughter-
in-law, who stated that a person of the name of i\PNeat, who
was not taken; gave the money to Casey, who was in the house,
and lodged with them, and that her father was lying on a sick
bed when the officers entered

The JunGE, in summing up-, said this case depended en the
prisoners having the unlawful cust.dy of a mould for making
counterfeit coin. If they were of opinion that all were using it,
that would be sufficient, custody and joint possession bringing
them within the act' of pariiainent. One of the prisoners, the
female Connor, was in the eve of the law acting udder the au-
thority of her husband, and -could not be amenable for her act
in that case.

The jury found Michael Casey, Patrick Higgins, and Charles
Connor guilty, and Bridget Connor pot guilty.
The coni t sentenced the prisoners to he transported for life.

UTTERING COCNTERFEIT COIN.

Ellen APGarvey, alias Ellen Atkins, was charued with uttering
a counterfeit sovereign, with a knowledge that it was counter-
feit, and that she had previously uttered a counterfeit half-crown_.
The jury found the prisoner Guilty. '
The court sentenced her to be transported for life.
The grand jury ignored the hill of indictment against Ralph
Hodgson Yates, chitrged with rape.

In:CHONG COUNTERFEIT COINS.

Joseph Atkins Wa4 indieted for tittering a you !terfeit sovereign
to Mary IVhitwnrrti, of Chapel-s!reet, Salford, knowing the
same .tO he cotititelleit.

Mr: AftmszuoNo and Sergeant ATCHERLEY appeared on
behalf of the crown, and Dr. BROWN for the orisoner.
Mrs. Mary Whitworth deposed to berhusband keeping a shop
a 4 Salford, and to the prisoner passing a bad sovereign to her.
She slit the sovereign m a cup: He , was afterwar,:s appre-
hended:'arrti she identified him. - ' • -
Another witness, a grocer, depoOd to the prisoner purchasig
some sugar and tea, which aintiMited to Itid., and offering
counterfeit sovereign in kviiient. On discovering this, the
prisoner took 'it up to look at it, and put down another, which
was not the same.

Mr. Southwell, who keeps a shop in Salford, deposed to the
prisoner last tried and the prisoner entering his shop to purchase
a pair of shoes, and -to the two offering a bad sovereign in pay•
rnent.

Other witnesses were called, who gave similar evidence.

-Mr. Whitworth examined by Dr.ilitoW N.—There were other
elk sovereigns in the cup; but she was certain that sovereign
was the one that the prisoner had paid to her.
BuowN, in defence, said they, must he satisfied that this
bad sovereign was passed to-- Mary Whicwottli by the prisoner,
er the case was at an end..

The JUDGE, in summing up, said they must he satisfied that
this was the identical sovereign passed by the prisoner. If they
had any doubt, they must give the prisouer the benefit of -that
ci,jubt.

The jury found the prisoner Guilty.
The court sentenced hitu to be imprisoned and kept to tiara
labour for twelve calendar months.

ASSAULT AND HIGHWAY ROBBERY

John. Ebon,--ix":-gWi.29, Thomas Eastwood, 'Ai. and Sidney Kay
were indicted for having assaulted Mr. Albert Hudson Royds
at Middleton in September last, and for having stolen from his
person ss. and a wech. They were also charged with having
assaulted Mr. Win. Royds; and stolen from his person t h reesove-
reigns and 45., a pocket-book, and other articles, his-property.
Mr. BRANDT and Mr. PEEL appeared for the prosecutor;
Dr. linoWN defended Bison and Eastwood, and Mr. NV mictNs
defended Kay.
Mr. BRANDT stated the case. The three prisoners were
charged with robbing Mr, Royds and his brother on the night
of the 2Ph of September. They were returning from Manches-
ter to 'their father's house near Rochdale at about ten o'clock,
and arrived at Rochdale about eleveu o'clock. It was then a
Starlight night. They then proceeded about three miles beyond
Middleton, and were engaged in a.conversation, which was a
singular coincidence, about a previous robbery which had taken
place a short time before at that very spot. The subject was
only half finished when sis or seven men rushed out of a thicket
upon them.. Mr. Royds succeeded in getting away, but, hearing
the cries of his brother, he was induced to return to his assist-
ance, and before doing so took the. precaution of slipping his
watch down into his boots' Ile rode right amongst the parties,
as if to charge them and drive them away. He was presently
surrounded and beaten. The horse, in whose strength he
seemed to rely, struck out violently with his forefeet, and the
vengeance of the party seemed to have been tiattly directed against
himself, and partly against his horse. hey used Mr. Royds
with great violence, but did not succeed in getting him off .his
horse. 'They apparently had some consciousness where his
watch was, and pulled off his boots and gOt it. During this time
he had an opportunity of seeing the faces of two of the party
with great nistinetness. Of course they would scrutinise that
evidence, because on that point much depended, Information
was conveyed to the police-office, and assistance was. procured,
and lights and fee marks were discovered where the' struggle
had taken place which had been found to correspond with the
shoes of one of the prisoners:and in the track of those feet marks
was found the sock and the boots-of Mr: Royds. One of thepri-
soners was found, *hen taken, to have a severe wound on his
forehead, and it wait supposed to have been inflicted by the horse
when plunging.- A: number of persons werVtaken into custody,
and Mr. Royds at once identifiml the three prisoners out of them.
They were committed ; and whilst the inquiry was pending be-
fore-the magistrates, and the prisoners were in custody, a.con-
-re'rarrirn had ,Weri -,iVe'rfieard li•rivna• of Orli constables, whiiii
would be proved, and which was a -strOng addition to the eVi-
dence of the prosecutor He would now call their attention to
the evidence of the witnesses.

' Dr. BROWN applied to have all the witnessclint tHose under
examination ordered out of court. . _ .

Mr. Albert Hudson Royde said, his father lied near X•cli-
dale. .He and his brother were returnin house on the. night of
the 24th September from Mr. Milnes'S, of Manchester, where
they had been dining. They were loth on horseback, and were
-followed by the servant. who was also' thoont nd. • Ptii4r va,
home led through. Prestwich, and through Muld eton ; itst uc;
eleVen as they passed through Mi4dieton. a; a 1) c
called Slattox on the road, about three miles beyond Middi, too:
The road at Slattox had been newly gravelled. and they all
three went on to the foot walk ; he was first. There was a brick-
field between the place called Slattox and 'Filth. Smithy. He.
had noticed it before that night, and had heard of a robbery
being committed there before. He was talking about the rob-
bery when he got opposite to the place. and whilst doing so he
received a blow on the head, which threw hint on his horse's__
neck. He recovered himself, and shouted " fittiloa!” and im-
mediately afterwards received a great number of blows. Ile no-
ticed four or five men at that time.' The horse he was on Was a
very spirited horse, and he got away trona them. After having.
gone about twenty yards he thought he heard his brother moan.
He then slipped his watch inside his dress, in the hope that it
might get into his boots, and then returned hack to his brother's-
assistance. When he got up to him he saw sx or eight men en
him. He then rode right amongst them, and his horse foeght
beautifully With his mouth and fore feet, and he fancied that his
• horse struck:the men with his fore feet.• The men then a.,lain at-
tacked him, and one of them attemptCd to lay hot(' of his bridle.'
It was the prisoner Ekon. It was a fine stat-light night. There
was an attempt made to get him off his-horse by pulling his legs.
He said if they would give over abusing him he would give them
his money. act then gave them his money—a few shillings:
They had knocked his hat off his head ; he told them now they
had got his money they should behave tike men, anti give hint
his hat, and the prisoner Eastwood gave him his hat. 'Before
he gave them his money he found resistance wonld be of no use,
and he then did his best to see the men, that he might recognise
them again. He was sure Eastwood was -the man who gaVe
him his hat back. His watch had stopped abov-e his 'knee, and
they discovered it and drew it down his leg, and pelted off his
bontsj and sock Lhis watch fell, and the-prisoner Sidney Kay.
picked it itp He had no doubt about it. Most of the men
were armed with poles. He noticed Kay striking him 'also.
'He saw distinctly that they went across the bricktield after they
left. They went through a gap in the hedge, called a stangs.
When they were gone he found his brother unable to tell what
had happened to him; he did not know what had become of the
servant. He took his brother and left him at Trutt Smithy toll-
house. He theta went to Rochdale, about three miles off, to get
assistance.- He arrived at the constable's house about twelve
o'clock, and Mr. Johnson sent his son Peter back with him.
When they had got to the place they found . some men
trearchin, with a light, and he pointed out the place where the
robbery had been committed and thegap in the hedge where the
men had gone through. He had afterwards to see a surgeon
his shoulder was dislocated.. He found his, horse had been se-
verely breiSed and one of his eves knocked out. tie went on
the Saturday to.the lock-upat Rochdale, anti saw threepersons_
there in custody whom he identified as the parties who had
,A-obbed him. .

Cross-examined by Dr. BROWN.—IIe was alarmed at first on
'the blows being struck;-'hut• not afterwards.- •He had the oppor...
tunityfof seeing the party attacking him a couple of minutes.
Gras nearly as cool as'he was just then when :they were drag-
ging off his boots: The naen-Were—stranget‘-to him. • It was
star-light, then it got afterwards rother darker.- •
• By Mr. WILLIANIS.-ft was'on the second day of Heaton
park races; he had dined after the raves, and he had not' had
wine to affect him. He had never authorised any one to offer
a reward to Kaye to confess the fact. He had never authorised
Johnson to promise prisoner Kay a reward if he would confess,
.or to give him a new suit of clothes.
Benjamin Galtrip deposed to being. servant with Mr. lioyds,
and to riding behind them to Trub Smithy, to where his master
was attacked. They knocked his hat off, and took hold of his
heg, and got his foot out of the stirrup. He thentinned
orse round and galloped off to Middleton for assistance, and
he returned to the spot in a short time with five or six men.

Cross-examined by Dr. BROW INT.—He did not take any notice
of the stars that night. He never saw a light got. lie went to
the Trumpeter public-house, at Middleton, and got some per-
sons to come back with hitn. Ile expected to find his master
dead when he got back. Ele did not stay. above a minute at the
-place.... • •
Peter Johnson deposed to his father being a constable at
Rochdale, andto Mr. Reyds coming to his father's house on the
night of the 24th of September last, at a little atter twelve
o'clock. His father was ill et the time, and he returned with
Mr. Lloyds to the place where the robbery had been committed,
Which Mr. Royds pointed out to him. They left their horses at
Slattox, and then returned to the place. h was a cold star-
light night. They got a light at Slattox. When they got to
the gap in the hedge where. the thieves had gone through, called
a stony, they noticed some foot-marks on both sides of it
There were the feet-marks of five or •six different persons, and
one pair were peculiar. The impression was as if the toes of
the shoes had been mended, and one of them made au he pi es-
sion as if there were four roils on one side and three on the
other, with a gap as if a nail was out. He traced these steps
across the field to a gap which led to an adjoining field. 'there
was a large gutter where they bad walked backwards and for-
wards as if they had not been able to get over, and the shoe
marks here were quite distinct, end one of the shoe marks
was
Peculiar, it was the same as that at the stetagg: He went
again
la the afternoon byu his fathers direction, accompanied
Telor and Edmnd Collins, constables. They found a. boot
in a field near the robbery, which was afterwards found to be
Mr. 1i oyds, near a path leading to Slake-hill Fold. When they
had gone about thirty yards further Taylor picked up a sock.
He did not know At that time that the prisoner Kay lived at
Slake-hill Fold. Th-cre are about hAt-a-dozen houses. there.
Thcy,then went to the prisoner Sidney Kay's house,. but Aid
not ihrd hits at twine. In a few toitoites afterwards theft saw
hi In com,ng, zs p off as tie observed Mein he wen( into a weikiNi
house. They toett him into custody, anti *that& Astir