The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1841-08-20 00:00:00

THEATRE-ROYAL, LIVERPOOL

Under the Management of Mr. CLARKE, Sole Lessee

THE Public is respectfully informed that, in consequence
of the rapturous applause with which Mademoiselle
CERRITO, of Her Majesty's Theatre, London, has been
received on each Evening, an arrangement has been made for
FOUR NIGHTS MORE with that celebrated Dancer ; the first
of which will take place on MONDAY next, August 23, and
the second on WEDNESDAY, the 25th, being the only Two
Nights she can appear next week in Liverpool, as she is
Engaged to perform on other Nights at the Theatre-Royal,
Manchester.
To give every effect to the Dances, Mons. GUERRA,
Ballet Master and Principal Dancer of her Majesty's Theatre
is also Re-engaged, and will appear with Mademoiselle
CERRITO.
Miss O'BRYAN, one of the principal Dancers of her Ma-
jesty's Theatre, is also Re-engaged for Four Nights more.
To give variety to the Entertainments of the week, Mr.
HARLEY, of the Theatre-Royal, Covent-Garden, is Re-
engaged, and will appear on MONDAY, TUESDAY,
WEDNESDAY, THURSDAY, and FRIDAY next, in

favourite Dramas.
Mademoiselle CERRITO'S BENEFIT will take place on
MONDAY, August 30th.
Prices of Admission—Boxes, 4s. ; Upper Boxes, 3s. 6d.;
Pit, 2s. 6d. ; Gallery, ls.
The Box-office will be open daily, when Tickets may be
had, and places in the Boxes taken, of Mr.i Minster, from
Ten until Four. No places canbe secured unless tickets are
taken.
Doors to be opened at Seven, and the Performance to
commence at Half-past Seven.
Places for Mademoiselle Cerrito's Nights may be taken
daily from Tent until Four.

iratant from guclt at fcehlc attack no WO We
tall merely add, that if the Mercury's statement be
.lowed as the true cause of that glorious change which
as taken place in the political sentiments of Liverpool,
is the strongest condemnation that could possibly be
ttered against the sophistical and miserable inanities
f the mock philosophy, or, rather, mesmeric humbug
nd nonsense of which the Mercury himself is so emi-
Lent a teacher.

"Nearly one-third of the population of Liverpool," says
this veracious ranter, " profess the Roman Catholic creed,
which for centuries was the creed of their and our forefathers ;
and for a conscientious adherence to the religion in which
they have been born and educated they have been publicly
stigmatized, as men regardless of the sanctity of an oath,
and, of course, as men in whom it would not be safe to re-
pose any confidence."

None but a bad cause requires the support of false-

►ood. It is not true that the Roman Catholics have
wen stigmatised for " a conscientious adherence to the
•eligion in which they have been born ;" but such of
hem as have shown thems.ves " regardless of the
3anctity of an oath" have been stigmatised, and justly

stigmatised for such scandalous breach of faith. The
portals of the constitution were thrown widely open to

them upon the solemn pledge and assurance that they
would use no privilege which they should attain, to do
any injury to the Established Church ; and yet on how
many occasions have Roman Catholics used their privi-
leges directly in the teeth of this pledge, and sought
to deprive the Church either of property or influence
by availing themselves of the position at which they
arrived by means of these now violated oaths and
pledges ? The men who have acted thus have been
their own stigmatisers, and have proclaimed themselves
much more than their bitterest foes, " as men in whom
it would not be safe to repose any confidence."
With regard to their creed, it has been distinctly
proved that the perjury complained of has arisen from

he doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church respect

ing oaths—oaths especially made with those whom she I,
charitably calls heretics, and oaths made against her
interests; and, as a fomenter and fosterer of perjury,
she also stigmatises herself, and is most justly echoed
in the charge by others.
But, says the Mercury, Popery was "the religion of
our forefathers ;" true, and our forefathers did not
leave it, it is to be hoped, for nothing. They left it
then, we beg to remind him, for this very reason
amongst others, that it encouraged perjury, and be-
cause it so overlaid truth with falsehood that they had
no choice but to come out of it altogether, that they
might not be " partakers of her sins and receivers of
her plagues." If others abide in it, they must take the
consequences —consequences which neither we nor
others who may agree in our opinions seek to aggra-
vate, but which we would earnestly caution them
against, as well for their own sakes as for that of others.
" Our ancient" next talks of the " hell upon earth"
we should have "if the Catholic priesthood in this
town, in retaliation for the incessant insults heaped on
their creed by the bigots whose words we have just
quoted, should, in their turn, revile and ridicule the
creed of their calumniators ; should they from the
pulpit denounce Protestants as men utterly regardless
of the sanctity of an oath," &c, And is our ancient
such a simpleton as to imagine that the Popish priest.
hood in this town do not retaliate in the way he refers
to ? But the difference in the case is this, that the
Protestant creed defies them, and only laughs at all
their denunciations. Fair and open contoversy
indeed the Popish priesthood are rather shy of; but
as to denouncing all other creeds, it is of the very
essence of their system, and they never omit the

practice.
But we must hasten to a conclusion, and this we
shall do by quoting one more passage from the article
before us—a passage in which the learned Editor shews
himself worthy of the chair of liberalism, and one who
by the peculiar care he takes to arrive at truth himself,

. _
must be admirably well qualified to communicate it to
others. He says :

" The writer of this article has not visited a Catholic place
of worship half a score of times in his life, but he is on habits
of intimacy with some good practical Christians who profess
the Roman Catholic creed, and who regularly attend the
chapels, men whose bare word carries more weight with him
than would the oath of some of their clerical calumniators,
and on the authority of these worthy persons we venture to
assert that the Catholic priests never indulge in denuncia-
tion of the creeds of the Protestants, or others who differ
from them, so that in this respect the orthodox Orange poli-
tical parsons are left alone in their glory.' "
Here is a remarkably fine specimen of that humbug

thing which men call Liberalism. The writer is
certainly an admirer of holy water and the sacrifice of
the mass; although he, seldom goes to take the benefit
of either, and evidently thinks that they do by some
mysterious means produce "good practical Christians"

—and " men whose bare word carries more weight
with him than the oath of some Clergymen." He
ought then to read his recantation and go to mass ; we
cannot conceive what hinders him. But this is only a
preparatory flourish which is to usher in the important
fact that he the learned friend afore mentioned does
not believe that " the Catholic priests ever indulge in
denunciations of the creed of the Protestants !" He
would not believe it, not he; it would be quite illiberal
to do so ; but by the by there is a case in point for him
on this subject. There was an Irish fellow caught
once stealing a sheep—taken as they say, "in the
manour ;" half-a-dozen witnesses swore point blank
against him, and he was asked what he had to say in
his defence. Oh, a great deal, said he ; these paltry

half-dozen fellows say they saw me doing it, but what
signifies that ? I can get twenty that will swear they
never saw me. Just so it is with the Mercury and his

good practical Christian" witnesses. We wou

recommend him to make a tour in Ireland ; perhaps
that might have some effect upon his credulity, or in-
credulity rather; but liberalism is with him become so

inveterate that we would not undertake peremptorily
for his cure even by such means ; if we can prevent
others from being infected, it is as much as we may

tho two holio, both Using now, in 'Tito of Whigiory,
once more happily of ono mind ag to all leading prin.

The recent untoward news from China and the
American States may be looked upon as undesiyned
preparatives,—but in the light of preparatives they
may, nevertheless, be regarded. In this point of view,
the Whigs may be considered as having been preparing
to go from the first moment they made their way to
power ; certainly, no men could work better for their
own downfall than they have done. If the last news
from Macao may be relied upon, the horrific destruc-
tion of tea and tea-chests therein set forth ought to sit
heavily on the souls of the Whigs, and blast their
reputation for ever in the opinion not merely of tee-
totallers, but of all tea-drinking men, women, and
children throughout the realm. The emperor's "chops"
must absolutely command the total annihilation of all
teas by his dutiful subjects ; also of rhubarb, and
other articles necessary for " English barbarians."
Would that his " chops" could reach beyond his own
dominions ; we should have no objection, for our
part, to his chopping off the heads of blundering
blockheads who presume to undertake the management
of affairs for which neither art nor nature had given
them any competency.

The Conservative Parliament convened by an anti-
Conservative administration, assembled yesterday for
the first time. The swearing in of the new members
would occupy the remainder of the week, and the
opening of the session by a royal address is not to
take place till Tuesday next. Her Majesty, it is
stated, will not attend in person to deliver the speech
of her ministers—very much to their disappointment.
Their organ, the Globe, indeed assigns as the reason
for this, the interesting situation in which the Queen

is at present understood to be. We are happy to be-
lieve, however, that her Majesty enjoys most excellent
health, and that it is quite possible some other cause,
not quite so agreeable to the Whigs, may have in-

fluenced her determination. The Liberals have never
failed to boast that that tower of strength which con-
sists in having not only the Queen's name, but the
sovereign personally and entirely on their side, be-
longed to them, and exulted in the thought, that even
in their most pitiably degraded state, her Majesty
would continue to shed the lustre of her smiles upon
their adversity. However disagreeable it would neces-
sarily
be to her feelings to deliver a speech from the
throne, containing recommendations—for such we are
given to understand the forthcoming speech will con-
tain—entirely distasteful to the majority of her hearers
—and a speech to which she must be aware that a dis-
approving answer would unavoidably be given—her
ministers, nevertheless, presumed to flatter themselves
that she would go through this painful duty, and do
even more to show her attachment to liberal opinions.
The case, in point of fact, is likely to be otherwise ;
her Majesty, it is now confessed, will not speak the

speech, and consigns the task to the ordinary com-
missioners; whether fer the cause assigned by the
ministerial organ—or, the much more feasible one, of
dislike to so unenviable a duty under existing political
circumstances, we leave it to our readers to conjecture.

The royal speech, as we have observed, will recom-
mend to the adoption of parliament the debated mea-
sures of sugar, timber, and corn, and, of necessity,
must elicit an amended address—and that amended
address will inevitably be carried. The predicament is
an unpleasant one; but as it is one wantonly and in-
decently brought about by ministers, on their heads be
the consequences visited. It is a circumstance of
alleviation, however, that, as we have said, her Majesty
will not herself be the deliverer of the obnoxious
speech—and that being delivered by commissioners,
there will be the less difficulty in treating it as in every
respect the manifesto, and that only, of a beaten and

•etiring cabinet

The "all denominations" opened their council at
Manchester on Tuesday, and made a most miserable
show of it. They came flocking to the metropolis Of

*actory labour, it is said, to the number of 600, ar

upwards ; but, somehow, on arriving there, they ap
peared to shy the senate house, and not more than

ourth or fifth part attended bodily. The first day's
proceedings were quite characteristic of the assembly,

and " dissent" among the " Dissenters" was very new
bringing them to a sudden and lamentable finale

The first point on which they debated was, how they
should begin. Some were for opening the business
with prayer, and others were against it. " Can two
walk together except they be agreed ?" This was a
difficult point to determine ; but a burly Popish priest

from Ireland whacked the table, stamped the floor,
and with many furious gestures and a voice of thunder,
entered such a protest against saying " prayers," that

the poor Independents, Quakers, Shakers, Seekers,
and other " denominations" took flight, and surrender-
ed at discretion to the reverend but irate representative
of the scarlet lady. So prayers were voted out, and
the godly men gave their attention to the order of the
day. The Rev. Pye Smith then read a written dis-
course on free trade, which brought down the meeting
to near one o'clock—a serious hour in Manchester—

that hour, above all others, most devoutly observed
therein in the all-important business of renewing and
refreshing the inner man. It was then announced
...

that the—assembly must adjourn for the purpose of
feeding nn something more substantial than the pie
they had just had, and suffer elsewhere for their coun-
try, by reason of Tory oppression and monopoly, on
English roast beef and home-grown and made plum
pudding; after enduring this hardship, at the expense
chiefly of the millocrats, they were to resume their
arduous labours again at four o'clock.

And again, accordingly, they did meet at the hour
appointed ; but by this time they began to take a more
solid view of things, and finding, by experience, that

talking on a subject which peonle know nothing about,
is not so easy a task, they wisely brought Mr. Alder-
man Richard Cobden, M.P., and a Lord Ducie along
with them to insense them a little upon the mysteries
of political economy and free trade in grain. So ended
the first day's " conference," which certainly gives
great promise of what is to follow. The idea of men
proposing to enlighten parliament and the country on
a topic concerning which they are obliged to avow
themselves, at the first blush, totally ignorant, and to
crave some little instruction from a professed corn-law
doctor, is really so exceedingly preposterous and ridi-
culous, that we shall not be at all surprised to find the
whole affair terminate, shortly and suddenly, in broad
farce. It would be already ludicrous, if it were not in
some degree pitiable and distressing.