The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1836-08-19 00:00:00

,
LwEßPooi,

LIVERPOOL ASSIZES.

PRIUS--ThEsnAY

SCIIOI.IO Rasp AND ANOTHER.—This was an action
brought by. the.Aaiptilf, who is...a wheelwright in Liverpool,
against"iiiP Abfi.iiifint, who is a salt merchant' at Anderton, in
CheAtirn.,for-£29,.the cost, of repairing a lurry. The defen-
dants relns'ed pie} uncut on the ground, that the charge .was
al-
most as ''tnocn as the cost of a new lorry. The plaintiff proved
tit_.fie.,bad orders to put the lorry in complete repair, and
that it was in a sad delapidated state. It was proved for the de-
fence.that the lorry was worth £lO before It went to' be re-
paired-, and-that when the repairs were completed, it was only
worth 420. Several witnesses were examined for both sides.

Mr: Virightman appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Ciesswell
for the defendant. •

The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, damages £l5.

Mr. CRESSWELT„ in addressing, the jtirt 'for the plaintiff, void
this was another instance of the facility with whic h pi) 1 icie3
were effected where premiums were to be receive& and the difli
eultvjliere was of settling when money was to-he paid by these
gentlemen underwriters. The defence set up was, that the no-
-, .derwriters were deceived in the time of the sailing of the vessel.
and that if they-had known this, they would not baye effected
the insurance. What difference r'oultl the sailing of.two days
earlier make? Gould it make any material difference in. the
._risk worth mentioning? Had it' been during the hurricane
months it might, but it was not so. The only evidence affect-
ing, the case was. that a packet had arrived before the Marga-
rite, which sailed after her, but of which fact the defendant
would be quite as cognizant of as the plaintiff. The fact of the
ittsuranee.hring, effected at five times the usual premium was
! suircient evi4eiice that risk was apprehended by the defendants.
t As to the letters which had been put in, showing the fears of the
plaintiff, what had they to do with it? they depended entirely
1 upon the strength of the nerves of the plaintiff. The jury would
say whether, having paid this extravagant insurance, when the
loss occurred, the plaintiff should not have it made good.
His LolinsiiiY, in summing up, said he took it to be the rule
that every fact that was within the knowledge of the parties
effecting the insurance, and not within the knowledge of the
i underwriters, and calculated to affect the judgment of a prudent
1 underwriter in determining whether he would affect the insur-
auce or not, or on what terms he would effect it, ought to be
.communicated to the underwriter. The question for the jury
was, whether this misstatement and conceabient had been made,
and whether this misstatement and concealment were material;
if they found this to be the case there was no question the ver-
dict must be for the defendant, if not, for the plaintiff, and there
was no question as to the amount.

The jury expressed a wish to retire, and after an absence of
an hour and a half returned with a verdict for the defendant.

FAIRENS AND ANOTHER V. DALE.

Mr. Creswell and Mr. Crompton appeared for the plaintiff,
and Messrs. Alexander and Wightman for the defendant.
The declaration stated that the plaintiffs chartered a vessel,
"the Partizan", belonging to the defendants to take out a car-
go of coals to Montreal, and to bring back a full and complete
cargo of lawful merchandise, for which the defendants were to
receive the lump sum of £7OO.
Mr. CRESWELL opened the pleadings. The facts of the case
were, the ship had proceeded to Montreal, and the plaintiffs
not being able to obtain sufficient cargo there, had chartered
the vessel to other parties to receive so much per ton. It was
a matter of importance to the plaintiffs to get as much cargo
as possible, and to the defendants to make the voyage as quick
as they could; for whether the vessel was full or not, they could
receive the same sum.

It would be proved that the captain had abundant opportuni-
ties of selecting timber for well loading his ship. He under-
stood for the defence it was to be urged that, the captain had
not the opportunity of genial. good shaped timber for stowing.
In answer to that it would be proved that there was an abun,
dant supply of timber out of which the captain might choose.
The plaintiffs had a right of superintending the, stowage. No
notice was given to them of the time the vessel was began to be
filled until the ship was half full, and then they found that the
vessel had been loaded in a manner which was there styled by
the sailors; "blowing her up," They applied to the 'captain to
have to vessel unloaded and re-stowed, but which he refused to
allow. In consequence, the vessel arrived at Liverpool with
but two hundred loads of timber On board, and it would be
proved that the same vessel had brought two hundred and
eighty'and three hnndred loads of timber. The freight per load
was £35, so that the loss of the defendents would easily be made
out. • -

The depositions of various witnesses taken. by commission at
Montreal hearing' on the above facts were then read over. A
number of Witnesses were also called as to the custom of load-
in r_, and the mode of measuring timber in this trade.
For: the defence it`was contended that, the plaintiffs could not
but have known that the vessel was commenced to be loaded,
for they must have .given notice of it at the Custom-house.
That the vessel was stowed by proper and efficient officers, the
captain and mate looking properly after them, and the timber
was fairly squared. To prove this, and that the timber could
not have been chosen otherwise than it was, a number of wit-
nesses were examined. •

The cause occupied upwards of six hours.
HiS lordship summed up the evidence with considerable care.
The jury found a verdict for the defendant.
The court was adjourned at six o'clock.

NISI PRIUS.-THURSDAY.
RHODES AND OTHERS V. BURMISTER AND ANOTHER.

TRICKS UPON TRAVELLERS.-Mr. Cresswell appeared for the
plaintiffs, and Mr. Alexander for the defence.
The plaintiffs in this case are wine merchants at Huddersfield,
in Yorkshire, and the defendants wholesale wine merchants in
London. The plaintiff, Mr. Rhodes; sen., met a Mr. Willets, a
traveller of the defendants, in October, 1835, at Manchester,
who entered into a contract to supply the plaintiffs with 20 pipes
of port wine of a peculiar fine quality, to be forwarded in March,
1836, and to be paid for on a draft at twelve months. The de-
fendants had failed in fulfilling this contract, having sent a part
of the wines inferior to the sale sample which was shown to the
traveller by Mr. Rhodes, the traveller engaging to supply the
same. quality of wine at £42 per pipe. The defendants failing
to do this, the plaintiffs brought their action to recover £5OO
damages, which was alleged to be their loss front the non-supply
of the wine.
Thomas Stone deposed to being a traveller for the house of
Messrs. Prestwich and Co., wine merchants of London. He
was present when the contract was made between Messrs. Bur-
mister's traveller and Mr. Rhodes. He tasted the sample of
wine produced by Mr. Rhodes, and was of opinion it was worth
£54 or £55 a pipe. Wine rose in value £2 or £3 a pipe a month
or two afterwards.
Cross-examined.—Mr. Rhodes had offered to purchase wine
of hint if he had any of a fine quality equal to his sample. He
had no samples, however, equal to his. He had samples rang-
ing to £4B per pipe.
Robert Houghty deposed to being book-keeper with plaintiffs.
He remembered the, plaintiffs purchasing some wine of Alessis.:
Heythorn, of London. It was two pipes of port, to be the best
that Portugal could. produce. It was a sample of this wine
whiCh Mr. Rhodes took with him to Manchester.
The contract was put in and read, and also a number of let-
ters relating to it.
Cross-examined,-The wine was Kopke's Roriz's port, and
was a partiCular fine wine.
A letter was put in. by the plaintiffs from the defendants, of-
fering to refer, the case to arbitration.
Another letter was read in answer to this front Messsrs..Ta-
combe and Tindall, solicitors, of Huddersfield, to the effect that,
understanding that it was impossible for the defendants to fur-
nish any wine equal to the sample wine, according to their con-
tract, and Messrs.. Rhodes having sold that quality of wine
readily at £ll5 per pipe, they should hold the defendants by
their' contract for the amount of damage they had received.
They were willing to receive £5OO as compensation, but if this
was not agreed to, requiring the defendants to send the name of
their solicitor, that they might serve them with the necessary
process. .
Mr. John Wilson, manager of the bank at Huddersfield, de•
posed to being written to by defendants, inquiring the respecta-
bility of the plaintiffs, as they had entered probably into an
engagement with them in business amounting to £lOOO, at 12
months' credit.. His reply was, that they were fit to be trusted.
Mr. Butterfield Colton, wine merchant, of Liverpool, deposed
to having tasted the wine of Messrs. Rhodes, and to its being
worth about £54 or £56. in March last.
Cross-examined.--Old wines had increased in value the last
few months £2 or,£3 per pipe.
Richard Wortnald deposed to being traveller for Messrs.
Heythorn, wine merchants, of London. He remembered their
house supplying some of Kopke's wine to Messrs. Rhodes. He
considered the value of that wine to be £6O per pipe in March
last. _ _

Cross-examined.—Parties purchasing wine at £6O per pipe
were not very numerous. It was his opinion, however, that
such wine ought to be drunk, for fine wine was physically be-
neficial to all men, if they could get it. He did not mean
physic y.
Mr. Glazebrook deposed to being an importer of wine in
Liverpool. He had tasted Mr. Rhodes' wine, and in his
opinion, in March last, it was worth about 58 or £6O per pipe.
Mr. ALEXANDER, its addressing the jury for the defendant,
contended, that, in the bargain between Mr. Rhodes, and Mr.
Willets, the traveller, Mr. Rhodes had concealed from him
that it was Roriz's wine, and that he had previously found a
traveller unable to equal it at £4B per pipe, and that this bar-
gain for the wine at £42 a pipe to equal "the finest wine that
Portugal could produce," was a species of overreaching, and a
trick upon Messrs. Burmester's traveller. That Messrs. Jacomlie
and Tindal's letter bore this out, for they claimed £5OO com-
pensation, whereas, their own witnesses had proved the damage
to be only £240.
He called—

-James William Willetts, the traveller for Messrs Burmister,
who male the contract. He had been traveller for the defend-
ants sixteen years. In October last, he made the contract with
Mr. Rhodes, in question. The sample of Mr. Rhodes, which
he tasted, was what they called a nullaye sample; it was in a
bottle half full. It was more difficult to form a judgment of
the wine in that state ; such sample was likely to be inferior.
After he had made the bargain, next morning he agreed with
Mr. Rhodes to send two pipes first as a sample. Mr. Rhodes
did not tell him what description of wine it was, or by whom it
was imported. The wine which he had contracted to furnish
was sent for to Portugal. There was a slight difference in the
age of the two wines, but the qualities were the same.
Mr. Matthew Clarke, bad been a wine and spirit-mer-
chant, in London, for twenty five years. He had tasted
Messrs. Rhodes' wine. It was very fine old wine, but its fare-
well flavour was exceedingly rough. In his opinion, supposing
it to be Roriz's wine, it would fetch in the market, from fifty to
fifty-five guineas. He bad tasted the wine sent for by Messrs.
Burmister, and he considered it a very excellent wine at £42
perpipe, and that it did the shippers credit. Roriz's wine was a
bonded heavy wine and not much in demand, it was used prin-
cipally for mixing:
Mr. John Wild, wine and spirit-merchant, of London,
had tasted both the wines. One was an old and matured
wine with Roriz's flavour, the other (the defendant's) was
'a much younger and sweeter wine. Messrs. Rhodes' wine
was worth £M per pipe. The other wine was a very excellent
wine at £42.

Mr. Preston, of ,Liverpool, vine-merchant gave similar tes.:
timony.
Mr. CaEswELL,' in -reply, designated this action to have
arisen from an act of meanness on the part of the defendants
not to fulfil a contract, which it turned out was not advanta-
geous to them, and that so far from any over-reaching, the
traveller who had made the contract with Mr. Rhodes was an
old and experienced traveller, likely to have his eyes open.
He designated the evidence of the traveller as shuffling.
His LoRDHIP in summing up, .regretted that such a tone of
asperity had been introduced into the cause, particularly by the
plaintiffs. He thought the term `• meanness" not warranted,-
and "shuffling witness" ought not to have been applied. The
witness had given his evidence fairly and was in the protection
of the court. The defendants pleaded that they were quite
ready to fulfil the contract by seeding other wine, but com-
plained that reasonable time had not been allowed to them to
do so before the action was brought. This was a question for
the jury. The damages would be what the difference was in
March last between £42 and the price of the sample wine.
Mr. CitEssivELL begged to withdraw the expressions alluded
to by his Lordship. • '
The
jury after a short consultation found a verdict for the
plaintiff. ' Damages, £2OO.
13A1,LING V. MORGAN.
Mr. Wightman appeared fur toe plaintiff, and Mr. Cresswell
for the defence.
This was an action bronkht'fo recover a sum of money due
by the defendant to' the :plaintiff fur work done, to which the
defendant pleaded,,a set off..
The plaintiff in this'ease Was a master mariner, and the de-
fendant was the owner'of a schooner called the exquisite. The
plaintiff took the vessel to Lima„ where he was instructed to sell
it, but if he'could-tot 'do 'so advantageously he was to bring
back a cargo.of specie. The plaintiff not succeeding in selling
the vessel shipped a cargo of specie. Captain Wiling whilst
there, had an over of a hundred dollars per month, which being
a higher rate than lie then received, he had a right, if he chose,
to accept. Afterwards the same rate was agreed to be given to
the captain, owing to the shippers of the freight not being wil-
ling to entrust their cargo with another captain. The captain's
demand would be for the amount of his wages at this rate.
The mate Of the vessel. Thomas Hicks, was called to prove

7

that the captain had•paid for various items of expenditure, but
.He deposed th.tt about £8 per month would be enough
stiary for the ca.ptain fOr the time they were put. On his cross-
examination lie disposed to the captain having appropriated
.abouf 3;.r.dollars to hii own use, and also to his selling about
£l2O Woriff of iron, which he had notaccounted for, but which
*P. VOID ised to give account of to the owner in balancing.
His Lot, Dsti IP here said that the plaintiff, ehad• only proved
£lO-i, the value of his services ; and as a c 4- if it was admitted
that he had taken £l2O, and about 300 d
Mr. WIG HTMAN had no further evider

The jury here expreSs6d, themselves wrfeetly satisfied, and
returned a verdict for the defendant.

BAIRD +. MACKENZIE.

Mr. Alexander and Mr. Venahies for. the plaintiff, and Mr.
Cresswell and Mr. Coltman for the defendant.

This was an action brought to recover a balance. of £lOO odd
from the defendant, who is a contractor on the Great Junction
Railway, for work done by. the plaintiff, who is an excavator,
engaged by. the defendant to do the work on the line. , A great
number of witnesses were examined, and there was much con-
flicting testimony as to the measurement of ,the 'Work done by
the defendant,. and the consequent valuation. The plaintiff
bringing evidence that £lO5 was due to him, and the defendant's
witnesses showing than an item of £l2 was only due, which was
paid into court. A multitude of accounts were Produced and read.
His LORDSHIP summed up with great care.
The case occupied altogether several hours.
The jury expressed a wish to retire.
The court was then adjourned, at half-past- six o'clock, his
Lordship saving that he would take the verdict at his lodgings.
After an absence of an hour, the jury found a verdict for the
defendant. _

TO THE EDITOR OF THE LIVERPOOL STANDARD.
Sir.—l have perused a small pamphlet, addressed to our " re-
forming" Town Council, on " Female Prostitution," deserving
of their most serious and prompt attention. It. points out a
course which is, ill my opinion, as far as it goes, a very judicious
one; and I well remember "one" of our late " mayors" having
something of the same kind i❑ view; and in the efforts to
organize a day and night police, (before the present one was
thought of,) he intended to have the police to live in their
" beat," thereby become acquainted with the several inhabitants,
and then he could with more certainty lay the information,
agreeably to act of parliament, in, order to put a stop to such
flagrant evils. It seems that the magistrates have greater power
than they choose to exert.—Yours, &c.
August 15111, 1836.

TO THE EDITOR OF THE LIVERPOOL ST.INDARD.

SIR,—In the STANDARD of last Friday, I perceive souse re-
marks from a correspondent, taking cognizance of a nuisance
of a most flagrant and abominable character; and to which, in
continuation, I beg leave to call the attention of the Town
Council and the inhabitants of Liverpool.
Conscientiously impressed, as I am, as to the injurious ten
dency of chemical manufactories in reference to public health,
I hesitate not to avow the conviction in the hope that the local
auttiotities, uninfluenced by favour or fear, may be induced to
consider it morally incumbent upon them to institute an Inves-
tigation, in order that the proprietors may be civilly, obliged to
adopt such precautions as may tend to counteract or palliate
those grievances of which I, in common with thousands, have
to complain.
It is surprising that the establishment of such works in the
bosom of the population should have been originally permitted,
and still more astonishing that their existence should be per-
petuated amidst so much wealth and enterprise. It indicates
the most culpable indifference to the public welfare' on the part
of those who have any power to mitigate the inconvenience
thus to allow the progressive increase of the nuisance. If a na-
tional' medical police had been organised, there would have
been a legitimate check upon these deleterious operations; but,
in the absence of such an institution, the evil, as it exists, must
be remedied by such chemical and mechanical improvements as
can be devised. Property is, no doubt, depreciated in va-
lue, in many situations, owing to the effluvia arising from
these works; but there is a still more important consider-
ation than vested interests, which demands the interference
of the public—the question of life and health must claim
precedence over every other feeling in the mind of every
honest citizen. The major part of the people of Liver-
pool must have been eyewitnesses to the blighted aspect which
vegetation wears in the neighbourhood of manufactories from
which noxious principles are evolved, and they must naturally
have inferred that, if the growth and health of vegetables be
thus affected, the functions of animal life must be liable to a
corresponding languor and derangement. The nuisances in
the northern part of the town are so varied and so numerous,
that to compensate the proprietors for their removal would only
unnecessarily add to our local burdens; but the respectability,
health, and character of the town obviously demand the surer-
vision of the authorities, and especially since resources are in
the power of the owners calculated to mitigate the evils. Suits
instituted in the Common Pleas have led to many important im-
provements, such as the general construction of furnaces, &c.
Brunton secured a patent for a furnace which revolved on its
axis, as the best means of decomposing smoke. But the most
important and, as yet, effective improvement is, the adaptation
of wide lofty chimneys iu a ratio proportionate to the consump-
tion of coal, so that by the gradual ascent through capacious
outlets the grosser parts of carbon are precipitated, and these
is not that accelerated propulsion which hurries forwards such
torrents of dense matter as at present deluge the neighbourhood.
The effluvia from many of the processes carried on, such as fer-
mentation, the escape of waste liquids, &c., however offensive,
exert little apparent morbid influence on the system ; but it is
to the more outrageous nuisance of acid vapour, that I feel it to
be my public duty to call particular attention, since all must
equally suffer from its noisome effects. An inquiry into such a
deterioration from the healthy constitution of the atmosphere as
abridges the comfort of people's homes, and strips the bloom
from their children's cheeks, cast spring from no feeling of pri-
vate resentment, but rather from a sense of aggravated public
injury. -The proprietors must be sensible how obnoxious these
sulpliureous acid vapours render the vicinity, and how impera-
tive it has become to adtipt every 'precaution that science and
mechanism can suggest, for ameliorating the evil so bitterly
complained against. I have often wondered at the profuse and
absolute waste of acid vapour, which takes place in some of
these manufactories; but I find in this fact a sufficient expla-
nation why the article should be 25 per cent. dearer in En-
gland than on the Continent. In France, for instance,. these
works would be suspended as soon as they were found to Justify
complaint. It hat occurred to me that an additional chamber
for the diffusion of the disengaged gases would .provide
for their better absorption, or pipes, containing water,
over which the vapours might be made to pass before their
final exit, to facilitate their neutralisation. The expert
meuts instituted on vegetables fully she w that this gase-
ous vapour is most pernicious; while, to animals it is still
more so—being, in a concentrated state, totally irresoirab e,
creating intense spasmodic agony and speedy asphyxia. In a
state of greater dilution, it occasions suffocating cough, acutely
painful and convulsive sensations, &c. ; while the more gene, al
diffusion of this fluid proves injurious to the health by excising
pungent smarting of the nostrils, irritation of the eves, headache,
strictured feeling of the chest, painful coughing, and general
derangement. I shall not now enlarge upon the consequences
of the constant inhalation of these vapours. 1 trust that the
owners of these works will cheerfully use means to alleviate the
evil, and so, ultimately, add to their already large profits.—l
ant, &c,
C. DUNDAS MITCHELL.
North Dispensary.

THE EUPHRATES EXPEDITION

( From a Letter, dated ✓lnnate, on the Euphrates, May 28, in the Literary

Gazette.)

The navigation of the river was carried on in the upper and
more difficult part by sending boats forward one day's journey,
whose duty it was to sound and survey at the same time, always
returning pilots to both steamers ; bul,'from the Castle of Era-
bar, below Balis, this system was discontinued on account of the
great increase of facilities which the ricer offered to navigation.
The Tigris, which drew one foot less of water than the Eu-
phrates, used, from the time we started together, to hold prece-
dence ' - while the diving-bell and flat boats were always sent off
some hours previous to our starting. Under this happy organiz-
ation the navigation and survey of the river were both carried
on at the same time with greater dispatch, and sufficient ac-
curacy of detail, and the towns of Deir, Abou Serai, Maver-
thein, were made places of friendly visitation, and the interest-
ing sites of Thapsacus, Dacca, Zenohia, Cercusium, and Sala-
hiyat were examined; and, until the 21st of May, not an inci-
dent had occurred to throw a film upon the enthusiasm which
dwelt in every bosom, or over the excitement of a first naviga-
tion of a splendid river, passing through a country so little
known.

On the day above mentioned the two steamers had left a wood
station near Salahiyat early in the morning, and proceeded in
the usual order of succession down the river. Near mid day the
Euphrates approached the Tigris, where the commander of the
expedition had, for the time being, taken up his abode to an
nounce that her supply of wood was nearly exhausted. A few
minutes afterwards some wood was observed piled upon the ri-
ver's banks in the neighbourhood of an Arab village, and the
steamers were brought round to try and make a purchase. This
was accordingly effected; the Arabs were found willing; and in
the interim of shipping the wood the crew had their dinners. It
was about two o'clock when we again started in our course, the
Tigris as usual leading the way. We had scarcely attained the
second reach from our wood station—the cliffs and ruined cas-
tles of Cersate and Esra were before us—when a dense black
cloud was observed moving across the dessert, f. urn the west-
north:west, and advancing in the teeth of the wind; as it ap-
proached it was found to consist in its base of huge lurid brown
red coloured masses of dust, which succeeded one another rapid-
ly, breasting the wind in their onward progress and rising to a
great height.
[Then follows an account of the loss of the Tigris; and the
letter writer continues-1
An accident of this kind gave an opportunity for the display
of much of that steadiness of conduct which is almost a national
characteristic. There was no anxious hurry; no precipitate
acts, loud acclamations, or unnerved despondency. Every little
act of duty was performed with alacrity and cheerfulness;,i. and
there was, throughout, that self-possession andi„n/Ideepaithity
all
_evil, was
mani-
fested, which takes away even from the hor,rioar
notA forgotten,
rgotAlmightyten,
iriedoi sfpseonmsearnoyf
oafl all
ourgoo'id.ol.
companions
had been
•
Mussulinans, assembledat divine taken away in a far off land, on a Saturday. On the next day,
Maltese, and even some
ser-
vice, when that beautiful and cheering portion of the Epistle of
St. Paul to the Corinthians, which has been introduced into our
burial service, was read by 'Captain Estcourt. The next day,
having descended the river lower down, we were enabled to pay
the last attentions to Mr. Saaler; and, in the evening, the body
of Moore floated up to the steamer. It was the same thing at
Anara ; and this almost momentary renewal of these melan-
choly scenes placed our commander, who has always risen in
energy with every great difficulty, under most trying circum-
stances, which have, indeed, occasioned no small portion of
regret to us all.
It will be observed, that this disaatrous accident has no more
reference to the question of the navigation of the Euphrates
than the loss of a steamer in the Long Reach of Gvvesend
would have with the navigability of the Thames.
With the exception of this event, the navigation of the
Euphrates had commenced under the best auspices, and was
going on most favourably. Deposits of lignite coal have been
ascertained; wood abounds on the banks; nothing is wanted
to propel the vessels which the country does not furnish at the
most trifling [expense. The Arabs have been courteous, civil,
and well intentioned, although not to be trusted by solitary
travellers. The officers and crew here enjoy a degree of un-
interrupted health, which was previously unknown among us;
and the warraest feeting of friendship cemented the little band. •
The survivors of the loss of the Tigris are ou the way houie;
the expeditionists who still remain with the Euphrates are yet
full of confidence and hope. Nothing, indeed, at this season
of the year can be more clear or evident than the free and facile
navigation of ." the Great River." It would. then, be an
.in-
justice, of which I hope our country is incapable, to decide
ligee
prematurely upon a question yet in abeyance ; "
it
who'in the
ungrateful to the commander, who has suffered so muc
cause which he has espoused, in any way to interfere
su
pre-
vent the happy remuneration of his labours in e
content, which has made its way through a rough d
an rude
spring, full of clouds and rain. mmwero

:iv of M

.General Saint Just, killed at Malaga, was the nepbet
Saint Just, a celebrated member of the French Couventtion.--,
Dutch•paper.