The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1853-08-23 00:00:00

to charter her to t
ceeding to Australi

for the chirte

Afterwards

er party lc
The acti

would have obtained upon the

ase occupied the cour

rEt
refit part of the (

a a verdict for the plaintif
e taken out of court.

A.N IRISH ELECTION

--Scrmx v. He

subsequently
•oceed to Per-

rty. The
nd ended

reed t

lIAN.—The de-

claration was for work and labour done, and on an aecoun4-
stated. The defendant had

mut, and now

pleaded " never indebted." - The action was brought bs
the plaintiff, a land agent and receiver, residing

Cashel, in order to reviver £lOO from the defendant, a
gentleman of fortune, living in London, as compensation

rvices rendered to hinion the eve of the last election,

s moved by ambition to become a senator
hof Cashel. He em

and to represent the Irish boroi
Rove(

and a Dublin solicitor, naiT

son; as his agents i 4

these -gentlemen were ilk- London, where Johnson saw the,
defendant, and they had a conversation about the state or
affairs at Cashel, Johnson giving the defendant information
as to the persons who had the greatest interest and influence
in the place, and from the 10th to the 18th there was
a constant communication• going on between the

with regard to

Hughan, wi

I address in his pocket, and with directions

to take all necessary steps to secure the
fendant. Accordingly Mr. Johnson, acc

itookey, proceeded to Cashel, a
addtess, and proceeded to eng,a
whom he thought most eligible,
'standing in the place, to further the
Hugkan.- Mr. Johnson engaged Mr.
a land agent, a person of considerabl
tion matters, to act as agent to Mr. H

urn of the de-
,panied by Mr.

at oneepublisbed the

out their character and

Iterest of Mr.
Scully, the plaintiff,
putation in elec-
; and Mr.
e plaintiff

should receive £lOO fo promote-the defendant's election.
Mr. Scully was not an elector, but lived gear the place.
He commenced operations at once, and day by day was
he engaged„from the 20th May to the rith June, in can-
vassing for Mr. Hughan, and doing all he could to promote
his return._ T•he defendant did not appear at Cashel until

r. Scul

duced to hini, and on several days the plaintiff went aboi
with the defendant canvassing. Mr. Hughan, saw M
Scully acting as, his agent, and, next to his solicitor, I
looked upon him as the most important person .to carr
on the election. liltimateb-, on the 27th June. Drobabl

dant withdrew fromthe contest, and after that the plaintiff
called upon him to,fulfil the bargain which Johnson h
entered into, but he:refused. 31
Lion, but he ought, said the I

his agent,

Applicaton was

an lost t
lel, to ha

ninety-four re

_,,,..Lered: electors in the borough, and ten
agents were employed, one of whom, named Laffan, having:
two brothers Roman Catholic priests, had received £7O a&
his share of £874 6s. ld. which the election had cost the
defendant, —A verdict was. returp- "-- the plaintiff.
SIMMONDS v. Wu...10v 4 was Georze

Simmonds, cigar deal
an old lady aged 7fl

k. —The defeuda
Lond(

Hotel, in Alnwiel
brou

mrs, wi

ind the defendant was
the Whit
The

Nerthumberlanc

ion wa

ht to recover

1.651 for a quantity of cigars pur-

the quantity sent had

seen been ordered, and that the

cigars were of a very inferior qualit
FRIDAY.

for the defendant.
BREACH OF ENGAGEMEN

A verdic

s sought to