Star.
London, England, 1829-06-05 00:00:00

ANOTHER LITTER SAME DATE.

A more animated scene :han our port this morning presented has
been seldom witnessed. Four steam packets, freighted with esr-
rages
and paidengers, left the harbour in succession Ili* M•jvsty's
mail packet. Captain Lyne, for Calais; alsti the Sovereign. Heusi
Quartre, and the litiyal George, for Boulome.
The Sovereign was freighted by his Royal Highness the Due
n'Onutaws, to convey himself and suite. His Royal 'Highness ar-
rived at Wright'.. Hotel and Ship lAn this morning at six o'clock,
£.w. most et the suite the preceding evening.
His Royal Highness was attended to the vessel by Admiral Win.
amps. John Ward, Rsq Collector of Customs, and many other
Gentlemen of the Out Authorial's, to allot wlwm his Royal High.
ness must graciously encoded his hand at parsing, and was evi-
dently affected by the hearty cheering of the &swinged crowds.
Every snark of respect was paid to his Royal Highness by the
military •iii garrison here, who were stationed before Wright's
Hotel, and salutes were fired on his Royal Highness's arrival and
departure.
His Grace the Duke of Hamann and suite, sailed front
Wright's.
Lard and Lady BALOAILIAII, Mr. and Mrs. G. liar, &c. arrived
there, this day, from Calais.

10E.

(CH, Josi 4.
DOANZ.
headings, and Mr.
action was brought
.ibel published by
plaintiff and his wife
kept .iy -_ defendant pleaded a
justification. The plaintiff was porter to the Angel
Inn, and his wife was chambermaid, and both had
borne an excellent character previous to their mar-
riage, win') they opened a lodging-house in New Inn
Buildings. Walters still continued in the service of
Mr. Eames, of the Angel, to whom, in consequence
of some disagreement, the defendant (who lived next
door to them) sent a letter, stating that he must indict
Walters for the conduct of his wife in keeping a disor-
derly house, and alleging that Mrs. Walters and other
women had been in the habit of addressing men fro*
the windows, and inviting them in, and stating that a
lodger of his own, named Molony, had been with others
so invited. The Learned Counsel concluded by declaring
the falsehood of the above allegations, and calling
John Eames, who deposed, that he formerly kept the
Angel Inn, St. Clement's. The plaintiff and his wife
were both in his employ before they were married—
Walters for ten or twelve years, and his wife as cham-
bermaid for four years ; they had always behaved them-
selves well, and witness had never heard any complaint
against them, till he received the letter produced from
the defendant on the 16th of October, 1828. It stated
that the writer was pestered by the family of Wel-
ters, against whom and his wife the defender*
cud he should be obliged to prefer an indictment for
keeping a disorderly house. The plaintiff kept a lodg-
ing house in New Inn Buildings, next door to the hones
occupied by the defendant. The indictment was tried
at Westminster. Mr. Doane was in Court, but not es.
ermined. Defendant first complained verbally of Wal-
ters's wife, but was requested by witness to put his state-
ment in writing.
Cross ezaniined by Mr.Tuasstoaa—KoewMr.Doane
intimately, and had received favours from him. Pre-
vious to October he was at Cheltenham; witness die.
charged Walters from his employment in consequence
of defendant's letter; but Walters was, after the trial,
reinstated by the request of Mr. Doane, who before the
trial begged of witness to exorcise his influence on Wal-
ters with regard to his hoise.
The record of the acquittal of James Walters and his
wife, at Westminster, on an indictment for keeping a
disorderly holm, was put in.
James Molony stated that he lodged with defendant, but had
seen nothing improper or indecent on the part of the women, aL
though he had seen them speak to persons from the windows, het
had not beard the words spoken.
Robert Wallis was in October, 1821, In the employ of Mr.
Evans, law stationer, whose windows were opposite the pbbtirs.
Bad never seen others, or been himself invited Mee do bow by
the women. At the trial the Jury acquitted the phibir mrl bb
wife, before they bad finished their defence.
John Compton (also with Mr. Evans), Thomas Jeddar. Jar
'foldaway, Charles Webb, Isaac Iles, Samuel Janes, Thee. Welk
and William Sims (lodgers In the house), were called to prove the
general propriety with which the house was conductesl.—Betwels
twenty and thirty other witnesses were called to prove the same rams'
Mr. TN MIL= addressed the Jury in reply. Ile contended that
the defendant had shown, by the course he had penned, the absence'
of all malice against the plaintiff'. Instead of circulating the scandal
as a per ion instigated by malice would have done, he merely wrote
to Mr. Eames, whom he had welt known, a confidential letter, and
requested him to exercise his influence in restoring that order which
be was informed had in his absence been broken.

Verdict for the plaintiffs, on both ibMlCS—Datuages
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. Jvwz 4.
LIBELDIL GRBSPIGNY O. %VELLUM'S'.

This case, which has excited so much interebt, came
on to-day for trial, before Lord WIVFORD and a Spe-
cial Jury.

Mr. MESMER opened the pleadings. The declara.
tion charged the defendant with the &lively of certain
false and scandalous libels, wi:h a vie* to their publi-

cation in the Sunday lima and Age Newspapers, and
the decl4ration ruiner charged that these libels were
published in the aforesaid Newspapers.
Mr. Sergeant WILDE said that he appeared as Cour.-
sel for Sir William De Crespigny, who now applied to
a Jury of his country for justice, and for redress of the
injury which he feels has been deeply inflicted on him
by the defendant, Mr. Wellesley. The nature of the
charge.had already been explained to them by his friend
(Mr.Thessiger.) It was, that Mr. Wellesley procured the
publication of certain libels, imputing to the plaintiff
the crimes of incest and adultery. The plaintiff had now
arrived at an advanced stage of life—he was 65 years old,
yet at that stage of life he was compelled to call on Mr.
Wellesley to establish, by some proof, so foul a charge,
and if Mr. Wellesley should not answer that call, then
the plaintiff must appeal to the Jury for the only re-
paration which justice can afford—namely, compensa-
eon in damages for these injuries. In this case the Jury
could have many advantages—they could have the
author of the libel before them, and would hear from
him his motives for the publication. In many instances
Juries were at a loss to ascertain these motives, but here
there could be no such embarrassment. Mr. Wellesley
could appear before them to explain his motives, and
it would be for the Jury to say whether they would
furnish any mitigation for his conduct. As for the
libels, they could. without his assistance, suffi-
ciently disclose the history of the transactions out
of which they arose. It would appear that two
Ladies, sisters of the late Mrs. Wellesley, thought it
right to institute certain proceedings fer the ,purpose of
determining who should have the guardianship of the
children of the defendant and Mrs. Wellesley, the late
Miss Long. The Court of Chancery decided that Mr.
Wellesley was not a proper person for that trust.
The whole matter was judicially investigated, and
the decision was unfavourable to Mr. Wellesley;
nothing remained, therefore, but that the judg
ment of the Conn should be carried into 4ffect, unle►s
Mr. Wellesley could deter those by whom the
proceedings were instituted from acting on the decision
of the Lord Chancellor. For the purpose of effecting
that object Mr. Wellesley published the present libels.
The parties against whom they were directed were fe-
males, and the Jury must be aware bow powerful the
motives must be which would make Ladies run the ha-
'lard of having their names mixed up with such calum-
nies. and associated with such licentiousness. They were
aware that innocence could afford no shield against such
charges; and that, though proved to be malicious and
fal,e,they must pain every honourable breast. Threaten a
female with a crime, and more than the consequences of
actual guilt will attach from the mere charge. Mr.
Wollesley, however, knew that though he might attempt
to testify these Ladies, they were surrounded by re-
spectable friends who might rally round them, anti by
toes, confidence in the innocence of the Ladies go far to
defeat the object of the slander. It occurred to Mr.
Wellesley, therefore, that his object could notbe attained
without separating them from their friends. He was
obliged to snort to such in expedient; he mixed these
respectable friends np in the °barge, thinking if be could
bring them also bet ore the public kis end would be gained.
The Learned Sergeant then stated. that Mr. Heaton De
Crew/guy, the sou of the plaintiff, was Wel:iced and

in.

partisan of the defendant in the proceedings in the
Court of Chancery. It lot they appeared that Mr. Wel-
lesley had that influence over Mr. De Crespigny which
enabled him to make the strongest impression by the
weakest possible means. Mr. Wellesley knowing the
extent of that influence, goes to Mr. De Crespigny
and represents to him that he has the strongest
proof., such as no understanding could resist. This
statement of the proof owing all its force to the in.
fluence of Mr. Wellesley, and being often repeated
to Mr. De Crespigny. the latter Gentleman relying
'on the existence of his proofs, makes certain remarks,
which Mr. Wellesley carefully treasures up ; and when
he is afterwards called on for the proofs, he refers to
these very remarks as furnishing the full proofs. Mr.
Wellesley, it should be kept in remembrance, was a
man not to be taken off his guard; from the very first
moment that he contemplated any object, he kept his
end steadily in view. Thus he made a minute of all
his conversations with Mr. De Crespigny, without
one word to indicate by what remarks of his own
the observations of Mr. De Crespigny were elicited.
Mr. De Crespigny at length communicated the
charges to his respectable father, and on receiving from
him the most unqualified assurance of their falsehood
in every particular, he naturally enough called on Mr.
Wellesley for his proofs; but what does Mr. Wellesley
do? He actually turns and rests for his proofs on the
admissions made by Mr. De Crespigny himself. Mr. De
Crespigny might be a weak man, a bad man; it might
be that he was a mad man; the charge against the de-
fendant was, that he duped that Gentleman into a con.
versation and filled his mind with charges, of which
Mr. W. himself well knew that he had no proofs; and
that having elicited remarks from Mr. De Crespigny, he
afterwards put forth these very remarks as affording
evidence of the tiuth of the charges. The Learned
Sergeant then proceeded to read the alleged libels as they
appeared in the Suaday Times and Age newspapers. and;
commented on those parts which reflected on the chafer..
ter of the Misses Long. With reference to the duel be-'
tween Mr. DeCrespigny and Mr.W. be said that he could
as litttle account for the circumstance of the Rev. Mr.
De Crespigny's being made the confidant of his own
father's crimes, as he could defend the Rev. Gentleman's
conduct in fighting a duel, because proof of these
crimes were not furnished by Mr. Wellesley when called
on to do so. All the Learned Sergeant had now to
say was, that Sir. William De Crespigny. as the
nearest male. relation of the Misses Long, felt him.
self bound to come forward thus publicly to challenge
their common calumniator to The proof of his charges.
He trusted that the Jury would mark their sense
of the plaintiff's injuries in the only way in which
they could—namely, by the amount of the damages—
not that compensation in money could afford any rein.
ration, any more than it showed what view the Jury took
of the malignity of the charge, and its tendency to de.
stroy the character of the party against whom it was
aimed. That view was to be ascertained by the amount
of the damages alone. Mr. Wellesley had the ad-
vantage of the advocacy of the Attorney-General, but
he (Sergeant Wilde) did not fear that even his Learned
Friend's talents, great as they were, could bias their
judgments. After his Learned Friend had addressed
them, let them but read the libel, and that would
remove any undue impression that might be made
on them. It appeared from the first paper put in evi-
dence, of the date of the 29th of June, that Mr. Heaton
De Crespigny and Mr. Wellesley had fought a duel
respecting the communication between them, on the
subjects referred to. Mr. Wellesley was not satisfied
with some account (4 that duel, which had been pub.
lished, and thought it right to give his own version of
the case. The Learned Counsel here read and com-
mented upon the libels. After Mr. De Crespigny had
satisfied himself of the falsehood of the accusation, he
wrote the following letter to Mr. Wellesley :
" Mr. Heaton de Crespigny presents his compliments to hit.
Long Wellesky, and begs to acquaint him that be has had an in-
terview with his father on the subject of Mr. Long Wellesfey'a
charge against Miss basing intrigued with his father, and which
the latter most positively and distinctly denied, and further declares
in the most solemn manner the statements of Mr. Long Wellesley
to be utterly false. Under these circumstances, Mr. Heaton De
Crespigny feels it incumbent on him to demand of Mr. Long Wel-
lesley those regulate proofs which the case abolutely calls for.
Emil they be withheld, Mr. Heaton De Crespigny has hat one
course to panne, which is, to insist on immediate satisfaction, doe
both to the character of a parent and a near relation."
The parties soon alter repaired to Calais, where the
duel took place.

The funow-ing evidence was then produced
Mr. Thomas Gaspey examined by Mr. PoLt.ocx—l
was Editor of The Junday Times in June last. In con-
sequence of some communication from Mr.Welleslev,
waited on him. A letter signed by Mr. Wellesley's name
was iven to me, and when I afterwards saw him and
was in conversation with him, t referred to that letter.
I afterwards got a statement in writing from Mrs. Bligh,
in the presence of Mr. Wellesley ; this occur red on Thurs-
day, the 26th of June, at Mr. Wellesley's house. The
manuscript was here banded to the witness, who said
that it had been given to him for publication, and that
it was accordingly published. The witness read over
the abovementioned pap.r to Mrs. Bligh and Mr. Vlrel-
le.ley. I wrote a few remarks as a preface to the letters
which the paper contained. Mr. Wellesley approved of
these remas ks as an introduction. I subsequently re.
ceived other papers. I objected to one word in the let-
ters—that word WAS " obscene: Mr. Wellesley wished
rather to have asterisks substituted in the place of it than
that any more mild expiession should be used. On my
saying that although the statement furnished by Mr.
Wellesley might be true, as the strong vouchers which
he then produced warranted me in thinking, yet that I
could not run the risk of inserting it, both Mrs. Bligh
and Mr. Wellesley assured me that they would bear me
harmless in the publication.
Cross examined by the ATTORNEY GENERAL—Mr.
Wellesley often complained to me of the hardship of
being deprived of the care of his children, and I had
some conversation with him respecting the duel at
Calais. Mr. Wellesley particularly wished the papers
to be published.
The Sunday Times of the 29th of June was here put
in, likewise several letters, which were read.
The whole of the correspondence between Mr. Wel-
!miry and Mr. Heaton De Crespigny, and the state-
ments published at different periods in the Age and
Sunday Times newspapers, were here read.
Mr. T. Dean, examined by M r. Sergeant ANDREWS-••
I am clerk to Mr. Powell, of Lincoln's Inn ; I am ac-
quainted with the handwriting of Mr. and Mrs. Wel-
lesley, and believe the letters now produced are in their
hand-writing.
By the ATTORNEY•GENERAL.4 am not connected
with the Newspapers.
A letter from Mrs. W. then Mrs. Bligh, to the Editor
of the Sunday Times, requesting him to publish what it
contained, was then put in.
Mr. James Edward Nixon, Clerk to the plaintiffs
Attorney, examined—ln consequence of what had been
published in the Age. I wrote to Mr. Westmacott, de-
siring him to give up the original paper and the author.,
Mr. Westroacott then sent the papers now produced.
Mr. C. M. Westmaeott examined—l am Editor of
the Age newspaper. The documents now produced 1

received from Mr. Wellesley; they are the same that
were published by me in the Age. and which, on the
application of the last witness, I up to him.
Extracts from the Age newspaper, of the ISth and
20th ofJuly (after several objections by the ATTORNEY-
GENERAL, which were overruled by the Court), were
then read.
The Arronnst-GEN ERA t. (Sir James Scarlett). for the
defendant, said, that though not unaccustomed to the
discharge of duties of this nature, he never had so much
serious difficulty to contend with as in the present in-
stance. This was rather a candid avowal to make in
the outset; but when he explained that difficulty, the
July would see that it was not founded on any idea of
abandoning his client. The difficulty was this—so much.
had been said and written of Mr. Wellesley—the public
had been so much nauseated by all they had heard
and read of him, that :so one could come into Court
respecting whom a Jury could be more likely to
have a prepossession in all that concerned him.—
The Learned Gentleman knew how strongly such
feelings took possession of the human mind—that no-
thing was mote difficult than to get rid of them. He
entreated the Jury to dismiss all those considerations
from their minds. To. the Learned Judge, who was in
the daily habit of controulling his feelings and of sub
doing all heat of temper, that task was easy, but to Gen-
tlemen taken generally from socie:y it was more difficult.
His Learned Friend stated that the object of the defen-
dant was to deter the Misses Long from prosecuting the
proceedings respecting his children. On that point the
Attorney General would join issue with his Friend;
he denied that assertion of his Learned Friend, and
undertook to disprove it. His Learned Friend b tideJ
that the defendant, engaged as he was in the object of
ge ting the possession of his own children, had invented
these atrocious falsehoods against the Misses Long ; but
the Jury should bear in mind, that the Misses Long, or
their character, were not now before the Court. How-
ever entitled they might be to maintain an aetion in their
own name against the defendant, still the attack on
them ought not to be taken into the reckoning—if
reckoning there were—in an action between Sir W. De
Crespigny and Mr. Wellesley. It was, perhaps, an in-
discretion to have introduced their names in the pub-
lication, but the Jury must deal with the present ques-
tion as if they had never heard of the Misses Long.
Now his Learned Friend declared that this publica-
tion took place in order to terrify the Misses Long,
but it did not take place until the contest between
Mr. Wellesley and the Misses Long was at an
end. The dispute between them had been settled as far
as a judicial declaration would settle it; the matter was
finally judged. The Learned Gentleman, after further
observation on that part of the case, denied that any
direct charge of gailt was made against Sir William
De Crespigny, other than in the admissions of his own
son, or in communications made to Mr. Wellesley by
others. Mr. Wellesley did not pretend to say that he
bad seen any thing with his own eyes; nor had he put
that on the record. He pleaded that the libellous mat-
ter was communicated to him by the Reverend Mr.
Heaton De Crespigny ; the plaintiff, however, demurred
to that plea, and this Court very properly allowed the
demurrer, on the legal grounds that, even if the plain•
tiff's son proved, in the witness box, that he communi-
cated the matter to Mr. Wellesley, that circumstance
would not be a defence to the action. The plaintiff,
therefore, it was, who prevented Mr. Wellesley from
producing the individual from whom the information
came in the first instance. There was, besides, another
course open to the plaintiff, by which the case could be
fully inquired into. He might have put on the record
what the lawyers call the inducement to the libel—
that was, he might have set out the motives and ob-
ject of the defendant, and by that course be could
have afforded to the defendant the opportunity of
negativing the imputed motives. If, for instance, the
declaration charged the defendant with having fabri-
cated these charges, and with having communicated
these charges to the Reverend Mr. De Crespigny, it
would have been open to the defendant to bring
forward the plaintiff's own son to disprove that induce-
ment. The Attorney General, in going through the
libel, and commenting on the bearing of several
parts of it, put it to the Jury whether it did not
appear that the publication took place in a hasty
moment, and was deemed necessary by Mr. Wel-
lesley, as explanatory of the motives which led him
to adopt the extraordinary course of fighting a
duel with a Clergyman? The publication was no doubt
an indiscreet proceeding, and at Mr. Wellesley bad the
advantage of legal advice at the moment. he perhaps
would have refrained from exposing himself to the con-
sequences that might attach to it. On the whole of the
case be asked them, whether it ought not to be viewed
without reference to these prejudices, either in favour of
or against Mr. W. He must put it to them to say, did
they or did they not think that the publication was resort-
ed to for the sole and express purpose of injuring S rWm.
De Crespigny ? Could any man come to any other con-
clusion than this, that lie made these letters public be-
cause he was charged with having fabricated malicious
reports, and with refusing to retract that report on being
called on to do so? His own character, as a man of
honour, was at stake. Let the Jury look at the
transactions in that point of view, and the alleged mo.
tive of attacking the character of Sir William De
Crespigny would be negatived the moment it was seen
that Mr. Wellesley's object was to defend himself.
He did not put in a justification of the libel, because
he had never, for a moment, intended to say that he
himself knew this charge to be true. The Learned
Gentleman did not think that he went too far in
asking a verdict of acquittal for Mr. Wellesley; but
if the Jury should think otherwise, the next question
was, what the amouut of the damages ought to be?
Sir William De Crespigny had two suns, one of whom
had already fought a duel with Mr: Wellesley. This
was an atonement which, in the minds of all honourable
men, went tar to mitigate a party guilty of an indiscre-
tion. Why then offer up Mr. Wellesley as a sacrifice in
vindication of the plaintiff's character—why not look to
his own son—why not see whether all this was not the
result of his son's folly or wickedness? In conclusion,
after entering into a feeling detail of the misfortunes
of Mr. Wellesley, he prayed the Jury not to visit his
misfortunes on him, and punish one who had already
suffered so much.

Lord WUIIORD then proceeded to charge the Jury,
and told them to dismiss from their minds all parts of
the libel which did not refer to the plaintiff, and to him
alone. His Lordship, however, could not but think
thAt the defendant's object seemed to be, not alone to
defend his own character, but also to defame that of
other persons. The publication was certainly a libel,
and it was for the Jury, upon an attentive consideration
of the whole case, to say what damages they would
award the plaintiff. In estimating the damages, they
would bear in mind the station in life of the parties.
One was a Baronet, and the other, it would appear, was
the son of a Nobleman.
The Jury retired at 20 minutes to three o'clock, and
returned with a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages
One Thousand Paws&

I .SPORTING INTELLIGENCE.
EPSOM RACES—Timm:ay.
The whole world was Epsom yesterday. Indepeniiehtly of
the numbers of visite's who, having arrived on the preceding day,
venutred to remain a night in the town, London and the '44!
rounding country sent out fresh hosts in the morning. A, an
early hour persons were seen establishing themselves un whet are
considered the best points of view on the Downs. Coaches, east,
waggons, and every other description of vehicle were drawl* n;
along the Race.coarse, and converted into temporary stands. The
line formed by them ettended for full three-quarters of a mile aa
a direction hoe the winning towards the starting post at edam,
side of the Course, and for a considerable distance they Were
placed four or Ave deep. As the morning udvanced, all the reeds
leading to the Downs wete thronged—literally alive—with pas•
sengers hastening to the scene of the sports. Equipages rolled cei
wave upon wave, almost in one unbroken stream, from eleven
o'clock till the hour for commencing she running had nearly at.
rived. The scene was peculiarly sulking and animated, from the
moment when the splendid carriages descried at a disiance,vriudnie
their way through various roads leading to the Downs, sterna
like so many glitteting toys, till they came upon the eye in their-
full proportions, gay with rich liveries, and brilliant coleus Lent,
ing in the beams of the morning sun. Horsemen came in cloud,/
and foot travellers not a few. All seemed eager fur excirtnielt of
one sort or other. Some seeking it in business, others in 'rawee,.
By one o'clock the tide of visite v. was nearly at the lull. Tsai
young Queen of Portugal and Suite hail taken their place. in the
Stewards Stand, wbrre we observed the Duke de Chartres, so.
tended by Viscount Chabot, Genetal Reautrand. bcc. else t 4
Duke of Cumberland, the Duke and Duchess 01 Richmond, and
Lord Marche. It is Impossible to enumerate all the dioinguirheg
persons who attended In the course of the day: there was a perfect
galaxy of stars on the grand Stand, and upon the side of the hift
that overlooks the Course. Among these, we have only space ter
the names of the Duke of Sussex, the Duchess of Clarence, the
Dukes of Rutland, Grafton, Dorset. Leeds. Portland, Sr. Alban.,
(and Duchess); Marquisses of Titchlield.Wnrcester Queensberry,Exeter (and Marchioness); Earl. of Verulam, Sefton (and Conn.
less), Wilton (and Countess), Southampton, Jersey, Orford, (le,.
teraeld, Mounteliarles, Grosvenor, Clarendon; Lords G. Cara.
dish, J. Fitaroy, G. Bentinck, Manners, C. Somerset, es,deriash,
Lowther, Anson, Conyngliam, W. Lennox ; the Ladies i'.
and Lennox ; Hoo. E. Petre, R Grosvenor, Driscourbe, Gin.
Grosvenor, Sir J. Shelley, Sir G. Heathcote, Sir W. and Linty
Addy. The effect of the new Stand, nowded from root to haw-
ment with spectators, was extremely due : and thy bill opposite,
one solid mass of gorgeous equipages thronged with Ladies, pee.
rented a spectacle the most brslliaut and imposing that can well be
imagined. This sieve was a perfect sylvan theatre, occupied from
base to summit by more of lastly and brilliant than we alsso-t
ever before saw collected within an equal space: the charm of
the scene was heightened by a brilliant sun, the light in which
(severe as is the test) English beauty always appears to the greats.*
advantage. There has Cot been such a meeting at Epsom, in point
of extent and brilliancy, these many years. The numbers present
were variously calculated at from Ico.ooo to 150,000 persons. It
is unnecessary to say a single word in cunintendation of the es.
cellent arrangements, Untie, the direction of Mr. Maberly, the
acting Steward.
As the hour approached for deciding the Derby Stakes,*
sporting men were seen alternately galloping over the grounds ts
and from the various points of interest, and collected in the bet.
tine-ring. All was breathless ezpectatien—the suspense was ia.
creased by a considerable delay which took place in consequesce
of the adoption of a new system of regulating the starting by
Bags, as at Doncaster. There were two false starts. At keg*
the race commenced. and was decided Lu a shorter time that, it
takes to describe it. For awhile seven of the seventeen buries that
started kept together pretty closely. Patron was now left behind,
and the race lay between Frederick (the winner), Exquisite,
Rhoda, Prince Eugene, and Espagnolle, which were all in a heap.
A moment longer--Frederick has woo by a head—men scarcely
believe their eyes—the ring is in consternation. Exquisite came
next. As for Patron. the favourite, be contrived to get in some
twenty yards behind the winner. On the whole, we consider the
race a good one ; but where a number of unknown horses run, as
is the case in this instance, on result will surprise is. The qualities
of the favourite, or favourites, may be properly appreciated, but
who knows any thing about the powers of their untried oppo-
nents? It Is all a lottery ' • and the circumstance of se many heroes
starting as usually do for the Derby, adds to the uncertainty t they
have not room to run.

The Dentsles Stakes not Sllleg, therm* forams was abandoned.
Three bones only were esters&
The Derby Stakes of SO roes each, h ft ; f,r three year old woks,
sat 71k, and fillies, ad alb. The last mile and half ;89 admen.
hers. The owner of the second horse to receive 100 sews out of
the stakes.

Mr. Gratwicke's b c Frederick, by Little Jobs ... 1
Mr. Forth's gr c The Exquisite ..
The following also started, but were not placed by the Judge;
Mr. Rush's c by Tiresias
Lord Sligo's Prince Eugene
Lord G. Cavendish's e by Godolplda
Lord Exeter's b e Patron
Locd Seiton's e Morris Ducar
Lord Grosvenor's e Ebury
Mr. Hunter's c by Gestalt=
kir. Payne's e by Orville
Mr. Attwood's br e Leonardo
Mr. &onsbewer's Alma
Mr. Grevilk's Moak=
Mr, Young's Lazarus
Lord Egremoot's brother to Lapdog
Mr. Begbie's cb e by Moses, d by Median
Sir G. Heatkeete's b c by Centaur
In all 17. Lord Moinucharies's Rupert. Mr. Chariton's Harold.
sod Lord Egression's Cassel colt, were not drawn till the last how
Of two.

A slight review of the betting on this great stakes may not be eat
of place, which, from Its commencement up to the Newmarket
Craven Meeting, possessed an extraordinary character. On former
occasions it web thought wisest to back winners, but speculatien,fike
the times, has wonderfully changed of late, and the' march of intel-
lect" has brought about quite a new theory io the art of making a
book—oow.a.days. forsooth, It is looked upon as the safest to select
the favourites from the crowd of beaten horses, or horses from bed
and unlucky stables. For inmate' they picked out Canvas, Lass,
Prince Eugene. brother to Moses.itc. upon which they laid it ea
pretty strum& having them at various periods at the top of the odds;
nor did they find out their mistake Witco late to save themselves.
In no one instance at Newmarket did the favourites brought ers by
the knowing ones sustain the opinion generally expressed el thew;
while the only horse that turned out well was Patton, who was
scarcely ever higher than 18 or 20 to 1. So much for the boasted
superior judgment and intelligence of the Soloasuns of the Tart sod
so much for private trials. It is not in our recollection that a
Derby has produced so many first favourites, and at such keg
odds. Will.e-the. Wisp, Ropagnolle, Camel, Electra% Calg•
Canvas, Prince Eugene, Post Obit and Patron, have in their term
headed the betting, the last being the wily one that has remained
so for any time.
The betting before starting was 6 to S apt Patron. takes ; 7 to
1 apt Rhoda, u to 1 apt Ebury, 10 to 1 apt Lapdog, 12 to l apt
Morris Dancer, 12 to 1 agst &papas, 25 to 1 agst Mr. Payne's'
33 to 1 agst Frederick, and SO to 1 agst The Exquisite. Rhoda.
Frederick, and Prince Eugene came away is front, closely followed
by Patron, Morris Dancer, The Exquisite, and RApagnoUe. The
others well led up; they continued so up the hill and round the
corner, where Patron appeared to be well landed ; but inunodiately
after he gave unequivocal symptoms of tiring, and when be gat
within the distance it was clear that his chance was out. Dotheray
applied the persuaders, but be would not come, and the crack was
beat off some distance from home. The winner then singled himself
out, Exquisite being at his girths.Rheda,Princeßagene,and Emag•
Done lying round him,aad so theyfinished the race,Frederickwinnieg
by a head; but from the manner in which Forth brought him is,
we are satisfied he woo it without dilkulty. It is not easy to say
which of the other three was third, bat we believe that It waslthods.
Ebury was lurching all the way, and spite of °graces great eters
dons ran a very bad horse, as did Mohican, Lapdog, and most dthese that ran le behind the five above specified. In fact, notbilff
had a chance with Frederick and the Exquisite, both of whom are
trained by Forth. The result was a thuaderbok to nearly emir
one on the course, for no one had ever dreamt of either Frett
or the Exquisite save and except Forth himself, who has all aisle
stated his conviction that be should win. At kart be intended is
ride the Exquisite, but lotting that the other was the best, he ea
young Buckle on him, and jockied the winner himself in a art
rate style. displaying the most perfect knowledge of his horse, mg
evincing coolness and intrepidity not often footed in a men pugs
years of ap. He wins the sum of 20,000 i. by the race, sad JR.
Gratwicke nets 2,2301. by the stakes. We do not think that Of
other person wins up= Frederick, nearly every betting man IsiK
on Patron. The losses are heavy. especially among the Newmadet
people.
Sweepstakes of S sows. each and 30 added. The wisest to be kg

for 500, lee. Meets 2 miles. 7 sebscribees.
Mr. Coleman's Whisk. 4 yrs. Sat 71b . ..• I I
Mr. Oakes Arndt', 6 yrs. 9st 2111 ••• .-4
2
Mr. Mattam's Provides'', sirs. list
Lord Warwick's brother to Paul Isoms,4 yrs,.;. 3
out 71b
3 .
Mr. Belkeiey's Mt. 8 yrs. Ist • ».• • S 0
..
Mr. Cosby's Mickel Grove, rs, 7St « 4 •
kl---.__lill all ,----•••eN

Laseast &load asd Pababbed by jam bum, the Prop
at tbs Iris OrragieNo.l, Plikvbriacitanik Msg.

•p..

4.1M00•1•1010

• 111■IMINIIIIMI.

• APPR I
G
Letts
Twkk

1

A A-
A. D

Sc for Ii
Parapet.
Trio Dem
Chasiber
Odell fe
To be
of Mr. a

Roo'
WITH

A Id

• Drtirat
bracing di
and alga
'combing
Plea/ore I

Of Mode
ear Ekon
To boy
.t Mr Ra

e CA

GASDS

A bent

A 'I

41 Wee
4selon at
'with saki
Wilk ',lntl
and all tat
*Grounds,
and Meads

As Re
teeters, rot
!t4 substant
Alit Naiad
Whale 114
;Issuises• a
Partkrl
pr.,•l Me•
Tkkets for
s.
-7`

HEN
will
•}IOLDRII
rind what
and goal F
also Marini
tiventaelves
Oculars on
Orem doU
on at dick
It h pro
Facilities in
oniapaive
Wort Yeai
its vicinity
Auction el
maintd whi
die boat 111
gent
otaivlng F
offsets of of

ruvd, In
HENRY,
London,
Perfumers,
agent of int
unless the
covenantee
PfTer.l*6

4s abenre
lisegar's Co
oteppas a;

N;'
.-3011.11
4IL: vs Imp a

Illerreaaft a
of Appetite
WWII, at
winded co I
leltecb they
glee perevei
ylege fe vita

_
Sold i. I
Obriodsts, I
watt, I)4.bi
Medicitir V
TONIC F
rerfailit4
etreetatioh.
14zai.at
LEAK!
etaruse
One man 11
ease, will so
recevery. 1
eenytUient tl
et to na, as
limy /ears el
wilt drect a

htailnothint
this Mrdien
Issitis sew
dens, Within
4RBProptieicis,
tif
lasban of .cis
!ad 1
iti br Unit so
Gtafiefsoi
Dismastersm
DAMbk. ail
('tat . its
°D. 7.71.,„

L

• ; LIT'INTELLIGE/411
4'64 G'S BENCH,
7, sy a wire vDO
ti Pk, hp* ,e ned the ple
ry that this ac
for =air anarges, for a lil
the akliWirdAtakEng that the plain
kept a disorderly house. The defer