Star.
London, England, 1818-02-03 00:00:00

lieve there men to be traitors
produce the evidence they h
bring them-to trial'? He belie
but they were not to be fonn
thus apprehended and thrown
their persecutors ; for, if the IF
to make against those person
them to trial, they were thems
tors—( Load applastses). Th
well the advantages they had
those men to trial; they knew
their sides, and that their accn
with a favourable ear in the Co
fore they knew that if any thi
dieyhad every possible chance o
Why, then, were not the pa
Because they knew they conic
all the charges, which, by a m
bad induced the two Houses
away the liberties of the peop
by evidence so unfounded, t}
pejected by any night constl
hase).—They did, however,
tend to give evidence to that
false, and that falsehood w;
whole world. In one instar
circumstances, which must el
pet, the Government had s
jects. The trials at Derby,
trials, must give pain to ever
susceptible of pity. Convictic
and those were dwelt on as
the existence of treason in the
Went, that if all the circuit-
trialtwere sifted to the botu
that Ministers had acted v
city,in the whole of their pro
with them, and that they th,
ble fcr all the blood that had
—lt had been recently asserts
nisters, that the agents of Gc
in provoking the acts-of treat
tunate men at Derby sufferer
would assert that one of di,
the companion and associate
was now in London, and wo
this business. The individu:
although co-operating with
up and thrown into confinem
son, although the Governmei
ing only as an agmt. Thi:
blmg unworthy of any Gove
cient to point out the real cl
stration. Some days after ti
Crown had succeeded in cot
Derby, they were resolved r
came to town with their bri
eager to renew their attack
publishers of what were calle,
mous libels were next singled
punishment, although it was
secutions instituted against
been dropped, they were then
fury, and Mr. Hone was pi
though he had been dischai
' aance. He, however, obtain
over his prosecutors ; but has
obtained, and had Mr. Hoot
convicted, could any one I
would have liberated the Scat
would have still been kept i
new grounds would have bet
the S'Uspension of the Haber
fore, all that Ministers coulc
recourse taa Bill of Indemnit
from the consequences of the
oat their victims against the
legal redress for the sof/mill
From Ministers, then, they CI
tain any satisfaction for their
were not destitute, they we
their countrymen, to whose li
with confidence for redress f
suffered in supporting their
trymen, then, these sufferers
and through their countryme
stored again to society. H
would return to Ministers 'chi
censure and condemnation, al
of those who had been so littl
others. (Loud and reiteratea
Sir FRANCIS BURINITT stat
Pk Cartwright, had not been
clay; but that he had sent h
object of the Meeting, accomp
' be begged to be read. (ARP
Mr. CLEARY received the I,
ronet, and standing on the 12
PREY. The writer began by
fitment had not the power tc
or under any circumstances, I
men. This assertion he did
the House of Commons not I
cation of the people, but on a
for though the Parliament n
well constituted ; and althou
rpons were the true represent
they could have no authority
ties for a single moment, bac
;am; tes mightterthan their dele
as well
, power of the Court of King's
in its turn, might as well, try 1
of the, Parliament. As no pa
a higher power, so that of Pe
pend the rights of the people.
doing this was necessity, whi
rants plea—a necessity whit
power thought fit to explain.
very long, contained a variet]
the same effect ; and before ii
the company became impatie
letter might be printed. Thi
Mr. Cleary sat down, intimat
their wish should be complies

.Sir FRANCIS Bunnzrr nov
M,. Johnstone, who was me
the suspension of the Habeas
the Meeting. ( Cheers.)
Mr. JOHNSTONE sated hit
stone, from Manchester. He
call upon the. Meeting to take
various parts of the country,
their patience. He had been
menu without having comet
law whatcxer, or having co;