Star.
London, England, 1817-12-13 00:00:00

I

.

LAW 11117ELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY. DECEMBER IL
JUDGMENT.
IX-PARTI 111.30111tS IN RN NICIIMOND.

The L•nro CitancEttna......" In this matter, ex-
parte Hughes. what has occurred arose out of a coin-
mission of bankrupt taken out against a person of
.the name of Richmond, and it appears that that corn.
mission could not be supported, there not being a
petitioning creditor's debt. Upon the question
as to whether there was a petitioning creditor's
debt or not, it is not necessary for me at this mo-
ment to say nay thing, because it having been deter.
mined at law that them was not a petitioning ciedi-
vies debt, the--commission, of course, could not
stand, and has already been superseded. I am not
aware. nor have I been able to inform myself, from
looking to the papers, whether the costs of supersed-
ing it have been given, or are still reserved "
Mr. MOI4TAGUE-44 The costs were reserved."
Loan CHANCILLOn." .liven I must look into
that, and let you know what I think of those costs
to-morrow morning. It is impossible, in my judg.
ment, to look .t the question. whether there was a
Petitioning creditor's debt or not, without admitting
that it was extremely possible that very well advised
persons might think there was a petitioning credi-
tor's debt, and therefore I cannot look upon taking
out that commissirsn upon such a supposed petition-
ing creditot's debt, in the same light in which we
consider many stegs of that kind that are very hastily
adopted. Lord Ellenborough, if I recollect right.
did intimate that there bad been a good deal of fraud.
bat there was no petitioning creditor's debt. &on
after the commission had issued. a lady, of the manse
of Hughes, presented a petition to the Court. which
was reterred to the Vice Chancellor ;. and she insis.
teal, as matter of fact, that a lease belonging to her,'
which was a lease of considerable value, together
with all the stock and effects upon the farm to which.
that lease related ; and the question whether the pro-
' piety did or did not belong to her, was a question
which appears to me to have been on all sides
slbinitted to the jurisdiction of the Court, by the way
and manner in which it was treated. it is not. there- •
fore,- necessary to consider whether the Court lied
jurisdiction upon that loaner or not ; and the Vice-
ChancellOr referred it to the Commissioners, to era.
Mine whether that lease belonged to her or to Rich.
mood, the bankrupt f I bass looked at all the affi-
davits which were filed in support of the claim,
which insisted that the lease, and the stock and effects
belonged to the assignees, upon the ground that it
was Richmond's property, and not Hughes's. I
have looked also at all the affidavits that were filed
to substantiate the contrary fact, that it was Mrs.!
Hughes's, and not the bankrupt's—the bankrupt !
himself stems, roendly and positively, and ripen.
tedly, that it was Mrs. 'Hughes's. Now, I hope. after I
s vary impartial consideration of the affidavits, and
shoat the contents of the depositions upon which the
Conuniutioners made their return to the Vice Chan.
clam, which it has been insisted, and which I am
boned to recollect, Mit. Hughes has all atones::•
Owed, was an ez.parte act on the part of the
nsissioners! I say, looking at them affidavits, looking
at theta depoeitioosk looking at the acts of Richmond
-Itimodb and particularly his written acts, it thiseons-
aufolioa bad been a somosissioa which thould be asp
*tad, wintersr was the result of the questing. whose
peeper ty this lease and them stock and effects were 1,
i Molly do not, ass that Magness, acting honestly to.
wards creditors. could have refused, if they had acted
tinipanitely and soberly. tObam entered into the dia. I
tastoe. whether it was or not the bankrupt's pro.
pitestivit I add to that all the circonutaoces that at.
atm nature of the possession. This opium '
athisitra, in some degree, to be sanctioned by what
passed upon Mrs. Ifughes's entitle 8 ,I mean the as
gen upon. which she was tionsuited. It is impossible
foi me to enter into all the particulars of the mode in
which that trial was conducted 8 but it is beton. me
err a fact that she was emanated M the claim at this
pommy ; and it is before me as a tact that she was
nonsuited ppou a trial in which the Lord Chief Jun
tioli teemed to proffer himself to the commitment of
some of the parties. it others of diem would under.
tab to prosecute. I make no more of these einem-
Mailing I am alluding to in the affidavits, the deposn.
dense the nonauit, and so on. except to say again
that I do not think that the assignees could have ac• 1,
ted according to tbeir duty, considering Messiah.
stress nature of the claim of Mrs. Hughes, though it: ,
hid been finally established, if they bad not fairly li-
• ugated the question. It happened. however. that a
petition came before me.soine time in the month of '
August, IBIS, or 1816, in which it was meant to be
taken as a tact that the commission was good for
nothing. that there was no petitioning creditor's debt 1
that would support the commission, and here I
thought the assigneei got altogether wrong ; they
got wrong from a notion, that it this was not the pro. '
piety of Mrs. Hughes. but' the property of Rich. '
spend, they could retails it. Now in whatever way
aibevedlthes.not baying din benefit of a commission of
baabrupt is their hand, they Gould have. punted
Ithikeisood as their creditor, in order to recover what
wsight4be din to them respectively, I conceive it to
bowies:fame, dot the moment shot ounesiseionwas
sopeneded. they could not hold any property what.
•Oki Irtiikli they hail taken by virtue of tint coMmini
alai. sod tbit; they must, therefore, either give up
die 'property to Richnsood, the bankrupt, or have
Omit up to Mrs. Hughes, it Richmond, the bank-
rapt, thought proper to consent to such arrangement.
—=ls that 'stag, of the isusbuss Mrs. Hughes had
, not proved bet property to my satisfaction; but I
bt, eerteitily. that. the tendency of the evidence
tsbaCif altogether, which, nevertheless, I Might to
recilloas.atifik at it was before the Commissioners,
was rapresentod to be as ea-parte proceeding. I say
the Imam of the evidence appeared to Me such,
that, if I hid been the Judge at*Niai Print, I should
Adolf have diretted the Jury, if they would have at.
loaded s nay aphis" to say it was not Mrs. Hankies's
pwriret 1 • nod it the Assignees thooght proper tulip
tlisadealiall *a bars, the peopertyualeas ilipluas. aid
*AU not have it salami* claims It mists, it
was' ls's...Ale fur me to
.decide without directing
=' • " to try slime papally it was, which was men
yAtape. What pasted at that trial 4 do not
am
*O6 • .1
UMW tabs it for grassed, for the pre.
cost, %bmg ootwithstandiog what I conceive so have
hap she meaty of Irk Macedon evidence, all
trot min have been uses by satisfautory goollioung

sr/ideate, and that the Verdict by. which the Jury
have established it was her property, is right on the
nit& nee before them. That brings me to the con.
elusion of what is to be done now, and that divides
itself into one part net very difficult to dispose of,
and into another part which it is a little painful to
consider—at that time the Commissir being super
• vded, the Assignees being bound, tit my opinion,
, either to return that property to Richmond, if they
would not admit it to be Hughes's, for whether Rich-
mond bad a title to i not, it was his as between
him and the Assignees; such being the state of the
thing, and it having been suggested. there was a stir-
, prise on the Vice-Chancellor with respect to the or-
ders which he made, I thought it right, till it was
determined whose property it was. to make an order
to restrain the Assignees from disposing of the pro.
perry, giving them, nevertheless, leave to apply the
produce of the farm in keeping the same together as
a farm prop-rty, but hut meaning, and nobody can
put such a construction upon the words of the order.
as to suppose the Court did mean that they should be
able to deal with the property by sale as to amount
to an absolute forfeiture and destruction of the lease
itself. This order, expressly and plainly as it is
drawn, I do not find to apply to agents and servants,
and therefore that remains to be considered with re-
spect to the painful part of the cause as to Mr.
Wells. but under these circumstances, Mrs. Hughes
having established her claim, there is no difficulty in
onepart of the case, and that is this, that these As-
signers and Mr. Wells respectively, must be charged
in account with the value of the lease, and all the
property they had disposed of; I have no means of
avoiding that at present. With respect to directing
an issue which this petition prays, when I look at all
the transactions antecedent to the trial of this 'issue,
it does appear to me that I should throw a prejudice
upon the question of damages by directing any such
i •tie, which I ought not to attach to the trial of that
question. In directing, therefore, an account to be
taken of the value. and that they shall respectively
be charged with the value of the lease, and the value
of the other property, as it shall appear they respec-
tively possessed, I shall add only to that, that I
make that order without prejudice to any motion on
account of damages she may bring. When I include
Mr. Wells is this declaration, as fb who is not'
chargable, I have nothing to do with the question
whether he is or is not indemnified? I have only to
repeat (and that not because I am anxious to state
the powers and jurisdictions of this Court, but be.
cause I feel a just anxiety I think to keep men out of
the peril of that jorisdiction), that if an auctioneer
seppose any individual can indemnify him, not only
against the expense and damage his act.may occa.
mon, but against the consequences of a contempt of
this Court, that is a very fatal mistake; and that
gentlemen auctioneers, or others who act by the au-
thority of other persons, would do well to recollect
that though they may be set whole in point of peen-
Mary costs, they cannot be indemnified against the
punishment which belongs to the Court's vindicating
us own character. With respect to the matter of
costs, to bring the view I have of the effect of all
the transactions prior to the issue, I shaU Rive wo

Costs, except the cost, of that petition upon which the
issue Was directed. The costs of the issue and the
costs of the petition which has been now presented,
Slone. I think, must be paid id Mrs. Hughes. Now
having made these decleiations for the purpose of as.
cenaining is her lifeoime what I consider her rights,
if there is An application to be made against the exe.
cation of this order by any body, the Court will al-
ways be open to that application, and I hope able to
sisal with' it as may be just. With respect to the
matter of commitment, that is a matter which does
not belong to the consideration of what is due to Mrs.
Hughes as a matter of pecuniary interest. but belongs
to the Court itself, and for the present I shall keep
that question separate from the others I have been
determining."
Sir S. Rosunni--" I understand your Lordship to
reserve the consideration as to the commitment."
Loan CUANOILL011•••," Just so",
COURT OF KINGS BENCH, agcsmesit IS.
MARTIX V. KERMAN AND An rasa.
This was an action of trespass, to recover a com-
pensation in damages for th!thjury done to the
tiff, in consequence of the detendrinti having unlaw-
fully dispossessed her of a house, which the claimed
as executrix and devisee in trust, of the late Mr. Ro•
bert Taylor, of Bovr-laue.
The circumstances to the case were these, as opened
by Counsel, and proved in evidence .
The plaintiff, Mrs. Martin, was the reputed wife
of Mr. Taylor. during his ldoaime, mid his reputed
widow atter his decease, by whom she had several
Children. By his will he conveyed his personal
property. and his house in Bow-lane, to, two friends,
in trust, for the maintenance of Mrs. Mattis and her
sons, and for the edeCation of the latter. There was
a proviso in the trill, utatif his eldest son should be
disposed to continue the testator's business of * leather
merchant, in Bow-lane, alter the decease of hiefather,
that business should be carried on jointly by Mrs.
Martin and that son, the profits of the business to he
devoted to their maintenance respectively. and that
of,the other children. The will contained other pro.
visas not material to the present queition, Ind con-
cluded by making Mrs. Martin an executrix with the
two utmost: Atter the death Of Mr. Taylor, the
other executors declined acting, and she took upon
herself the sole execution of the will. The eldest son
and his mother then continued the testator's business,
under the firm of w The Widow Robert Taylor and
Son." They afterwards became bankrupts, and the
messenger under the commission took possession of
the house and furniture in Bow•lane and the assig-
nees continued the possession for about 18 months,
having turned Ma. Martin out ot• the house. She
was afterwards restored under an order of the Lord
Chancellor,. who held,. that by the trusts of the testa-
tot's will, the property in question was not vested in
tale assignees by the subsequent bankruptcy. The
designees had advertised the furniture and other ef.
diets on the premises for sale. but the" sale was stopt
)1 the authority of the Court of Chancery.—Under
,these circumetsoces the present action was btought•
by Mrs. Mania (due we widow Taylor) against the
soignee', to recover a compeasatioo in damages tor.
the alleged injury she had sustained in being dispos-
sessed of bet house during the above•owationed pa-
ned of eighteen months.
'lle bate et the ease were patted by =ref the
eons, when
Lord Emattibitevem reloatioceeled then bey *Ma

be ttterid into a ease for thP *rim of the Conn
abo►e, upon the legal construction (4f the will of Mr.
Taylor.
This course was adopted by the Courted on both
sides; and accordingly a verdict WAS found for the
plaintiff—Damages, £2OOO, sut?ject to a case.
OLD mkt I.Eir S ESSIO 146.

Yesterday, ✓ohn Brow* and William Shiro ia were
indicted, the one for stealing 50 pieces of silk gauze,
and two pieces of silk handkerchiefs, valve £5l, the
property of Robert Dabcfust, and the other for re-
ceiving the same, knowing them to have been stolen.
Samoa Jarvis stated, that he is a servant of Messrs

Daboust, of Vine-court, Spitalfields, silk-dyers. On
the 6th of November, he went to Messrs. Fulton and
Watling.street, and received there 50 pieces of
silk handkerchiefs. He packed them in a white bag,
and took them' to the Fountaia and Star, Castle.
court, Lawrence-lane, on his shoulder, and from
thence in a can. On his arrival in Fort•street, he
discovered that they were gone ; they could not have
out.
Mr. Daboust said he was a dyer. living in Vine.
court, Spitalfirlds. From information he went, on
the 24th of November, to Mrs. Phelps, a silk.dresser,
in Osborne-street, Whitechapel, where he saw some
gauze, which he had reason to believe was part of
that sent by Messrs. Fulton and Co. and two pieces
of silk handkerchiefs. Witness afterwards to ik Mr.
Fulton to Mrs. Phelps's to see the goofs, and in con-
sequence of enquiries he made, he sent to Shirwin's
house, and told him he came to enquire ab nit the
gauze which he had dyed and sent to Mrs. Phelps's.
Witness asked him, if he knew of whom he had
them I and he replied, he had them of a stranger,
whom he did not know. On the night of the 25th
of November, Shirwin's wife observed, she wished
witness had been there half an hour sooner, as the
person who brought the goods was there, and she
expected him again at eleven o'clock neat morning.
He went, in company with Armstrong, an officer,
and waited until past four o'clock, and nobody came.
About this time the ktter produced was brought to
Shirwin's house. Shirwin read it, and handed it over
to witness; it ran as follows

" To Mr. Shirwin, 111nrstreet, Spitalaekla.
London, Nov. *6, VW.
" Sta—in consequerce of the hurry of business, lis coder
the stecessby of leaving town foe Caretntry ; would therefore be
much obliged to you to get the reminder of the gauze done as
soya u possible; pock them carefully, and send them to Co-
ventry by Mr. Wrerhoeses coach, which starts from the Swan
with Two Necks, Lad lane. Direct them X. Y. Z. to be left at
the Crayon Arms till called lor Send your bill at the same
time, and I will remit yousinoney inuneduttely.
• " Y " X. Y. Z.
" P. S. Please to send line previous to their atrium. I shall
leave ceders there accordingly, and call daily for it."

In consequence of this letter, witness recommended
him to write an answer to it, but he declined to write
it, but sent for a person who w:ote an answer, which
was read to Shirwin. The substance was, that Shir-
win would not deliver than to any person but the
person who left them, and that he expected to be
paid for them. It was signed in Sbirwin's name,
and directed to X. Y. Z. to be left at the Craven-
Ara% High-street, Coventry. No answer ever came
iron X. Y.Z.

Wm. Robinson stated, that be was a silk-dyer, in
the employment of Mrs. Hannah Phelps ; the goods
produced were brought to Mrs. Phelps in two parcels..
The first was brought by Mrs. Shirai'', about the
17th of November, it contained about 16 pieces. On
fetching them down to dye, he haJ reason to suspect
that they were part of those stolen from Daboust,
and Mr. Daboust came and he sheared them to him.l
On the Tuesday following the remainder were
'brought by.Shirwin's wife, and Mr. Daboust and
Mr. Fulton examined them.
Mr. Fulton identified the goods produced to be
part of those sent to Mr. Daboust on the 6th Nov.
Frances Peyton, the younger, deposed, that she
was lately in the employment of Brown, who was a
weaver. Witness recollected taking a bag to her
mother's which Brown had given her, telling her it
was worsted, she believed it was on the 16th of No-
vember, abe could not say the day of the month, but
she was sore it was on a Wednesday ; she took it to
her mother's, end placed it down by the bed ; her
mother was present.
Frances Peyton, the elder, stilted, that in the latter
end of November, her &night* brought a bag with
her, and left it is the bed-room. Brown, the prosontir,
said he had it as worsted. vie bad orders from
Brown to take the goods awry; she was to take
them into•Bishopsgate-street, which she did, About
half-past twelve o'clock on that same day. Witness
met the prisoner Brown there, and save bim the bag
with its contents.
Rebecca Downes, a weaver, -rented the first floor
of Brown's house; she bad seen him write, and be-
lieved the letter produced, signed X. Y. Z. was his
hand-writing.
The prisoners called several witnesses, who gave
them good characters, and an alibi was att. meted
be established in favour of Brown. Tlit• July. how-
ever found them Guilty, but recommended them to
mercy, on account of tlu:ir previous good character.
The following were also convicted of felonies, viz.
W. Cerney, for stealing a quantity of lead; C. Bel-
ling, for stealing two cwt. of lead ; J. White, for
stealing a saws W. Underwood, for stealing a hand.
kerchief; 1. Mildew, for stealing a coat;
niel, for stealing a box coat; W. 11,7 an and J. 6ur-
Italie, for stealing a silk handkerchief; A. Cos, fcr
stealing a quantity of hay; and Mary Crampton, for
stealing a silver spoon. G. Porter was acquitted.

..Errattno.—Tbe name of the Common Councilman
who oa Thursday brought forward the motion rela-
tive to Special Juries, is Pearsall, not Pearson.

We feel pleasure in publishing the following letter,
u transmitted to us, in confirmation of a paragraph
which appeared in our Paper, relative to the cure ol
that general and dangerous complaint Rupture :
TO THE EDITOR OF THE STAR.
saa.....ohserving a paragraph In your Paper respecting the core
of an Heinle, performed (ot a large Axe) by the Medical Board,
at Charlotte House, Great Charlotte.street, Slacktriars Road, in
jastke, air, to Meters. COOPER and Co. beg to add my per-
sonal testimony. Having been aimed nearly twenty year% and
deemed incurable by eminent Surgeon% I patiently bore my af-
Iktion, expecting every hour to be my last; I at length voted
so the Medical Board, and have reason to pray tor that t zftllent
fietalskshment, for although I am nearly 50, was perlectly cured
in a few weeks, and now, thank GOD, enjoy good health,
'I think, Mr. Editor, who know me wlll allow that I can
have no albs, motive foe this antimunkation than a public be.
your obedient Servant, c. nclvtl4• D.
Dog and Slat, near LoodOn-reed, St. Geores
hide. Ocaober, 1111 f.

CHRISTMAS CATTLE SHEW.

Yesterday motning early. Mr. SAtil.ca's Yard,
Goswell-street, was opened lor tne EttHniti„ri of
fat Cattle. Sheep, and Pigs ...tile been sent
as candidates for the Bedtordean ernliii.nis. -
Yard was crnt‘dvd. The labels exhi!iited ..t
of the severll iiiiinials were as follow :
Premium I. Prize of 23gs. o Mr /Az Weste.,r, our his :7
forts flx, limn; six years old, bred Ly fir. Jones, (~,,„L
ge!d Medal is awarerd for ihe same); ted 14 Mr. Vt',,f
grass, bay, sumps, and ;Wail cake,.
Premium v. Prise of Y sg,. to Mr. Kuhert Masters, t--r h ,
year old Mots Ox (hre..-der unknown), fed en
tunips, travelled
Premium 9. Prise of 20gs. to Mr. Nathaniel Make, f,.r
:A-months obi In, p-wool!ed wetber Ater', be i by Julie ,
lington, fed on grass, and hay.
Premium 4. Prize of it: no. to Mr. John El ran, ten.
20-montia old South I /own Wetbtrs, Lied by Inmseb,a:
on grass, hat, and it,rnips.
Premiums 5. Prize of i to Mr. Inhr. Palmer, for flit t!.
weeks old Essex Pugi, bred and fed Ly hirn,Jf on
pea and barley meal.
EXTRA STr.CK.
Mr. Charles Cliamplot., a two.years and eleven mends
Durham Or, bred from Lis bull Young Cnnitt, and fe i on f
hay, turnips, and oil cake. as the best a hi, tg„.liki,
was seen in Mr. :4..1h is Yard, or perhaps in ngland.
The His,. I B. Simpson, a loar•yrar and .t3rer an
Durham Or, bred from his bull Eclipse, fed on bay seed.,
turnips, and cakes' travelled i SC miles
es hir. Charl Charni.Lin's throe twenty one mnnt t old
vonlird Webers, br-d and fed by hinttrif on gr.
and cake, haveraironimoti merit

Hl6 Grate Dkr of Bedford, a thee yrar oil
Heifer, kora his Grace's Woburn Park Farm.
Mitt), a Hanford Cow.
Lord iherbonse, three Ear F igr, only sixteen weeks ell,
by Mr. Chow Dodd, at Cnentes.
Gems, Dodd, two Pig., qui.. ten week.' vkl, br d I y
Mr. 'flumes Skinner, three three-year end seven months
Leicester beep, fed on gram,, hay, and cabbage.
Ditto, three $3 months old Wiltshire hop, bred by '
ky, fed on gra* hay, turnip., and cabb.igr.
Ditto, three %Wish runts, Mrs years
Christopher T. I owerii, Esq. tees Essex Pips, three
and one week old, of,* mixed Neapolitan vigil
bred by himself, and fed on potatoes and barley o.
Mr. A H. Champion, eight sevenuen-weeks uld Pip,
and fed by himself on peas
Mr. Boolttere ebewed a tine Merino carcase. granofed '
the weight of mutton being Tolb. andel Doss tat
Mr. Gibbs shewed several specinsens of M
pink and white, wnrot them we& ing near -
line yellow Sewed furnips, souse handsome Mote
IC.niti Raid.

.at.;

Mr. Leonard Phillips, jun. shewed very fine .
Roots, and of his Dew tewatoe, of wideh SO tom an.: up
" ware•• have been produced per acre; also some firs
roue growing spteinteas of Fiera' tor 'semi
autumnal produce.
Captain Harris shewed many very large aweed
Turnips, and routs of Maotel-wurael

THE MARKEI S.

NEWOATE AND I.F.ADENHALL MARKETS, DEC.
(By ft' ('aresse.)
Beef, rer stone 21 4d cn 3i act Veal S. Rho Ss
Mutton - Ss Od to 4$ Od j Pork 46 04 to Ls

PRICES OF HAY AND STRAW YESTERDAY.
IT. /A MILS'S. V' HITICNA re L.
Hay 31 toi 0,1 to 51 10. Od I Hay 41 10s to 51 ios
Straw 11 135 0.1 to 21 St 6d / Straw 11 18t to 21 is
Clover., 61. Os. Od. to ?I. Os.

?K UM 0

IF HOVo.
wtw SAGS. NM fOCIIrrs.
Kent SO Nto 291 Os Kent - 261 04 to 3111.
Sam 241 Os to 271 Os Sussex 261 0. ro Sol
lii 2SI
_Os to 311 OS Fatnhr•m 801 0. ,u 371

RAW HIDF..S.
Best Heifers and Steers (per Ordmary 616 04 to 16 gd
noes) - Ss 10d to Ss la Mirka Cab 7s.saels..
Middlings Sts 4.1 to Ss Iht ling Hcrst 101 to 101 0'
bheepakeas--Polled, 5s 661. tO iia 01--Dow,:s 4r th.: to 56f
bhesrlings Os 04. to ed.—Londe Vs of

PRICE OF !ALLOW.
lantees Market 4, 341 1 [own Tallow
Clare Market e O. 0.1 1 Yellow it,
Wltitrehapel Marie 4e White ditto
per none et 0111 1 Soap ditto
Yellow sae% ri • M .tled, lon—Cunt,
(Apart per due. lis Id—Mould%

PIUCII OF LEATHER IN I.IIADENN
Botts, fill to SAW v I f1..._ itsil Vali Skins,
Ditto ,4111 u sites hscf x 264 Ditto ...Ai to
Merchants Backe uod 001 Ditto 70 to
Dedsing Hides Ind 1741 Small Seals
Fins Cncli Hide. led MI !Arr. ditto
Tanned Horse hides 154 to 174 I Spanish Hoi,

COAL MARKET. DECEME
Skips at Market. Slairm st,W.
SS Newcastle 72
i• Sunderland . 14
1 Cinders

37$
00s.

PRICES OF MOLD AND SII;
Portugal Gold in Coin, per oz. £4
Foreign Guld in Bws . 4
New avulsion= . 0
New Dollars - . 0
Silverl In bars, standard - n

COURSK OF EXCHANC.I::
Amiterdam 37 G 13.2 U. Bareehitta CO
Ditto at sight 87 0 Bilbisa 13
Amsterdam 11 10 C. F. Sr. Sebvitian cc
Ditto at sigbt 11 7 Gibraltar t 3
Rotterdam 11 11 2 U. `Leghorn, iof
Antwerp 11 11 Otaroa, 1;
Harrburgh 34 62 U. Venicn,n. C. I.lv. Pleat
Alton 94 72 U. I ineffective per r. wes LS
Paris 3 days' date 24 44) Mat.% 44
I
Ditto 24 CO 2U. Naples, cif
.
—.....

E
SAoLam'aYard;
✓ of t!.,
c been irnt
II err •tiikaras,
;bi!iittLi el,
100. :
lVrst%:Jr, 14,r his
Mr. Jones, (tot
led Ly Mr. Vi.ticart 11
Matters, t 11.
frd t.t was',
• Make, f•l• P. th?
br..l by Juin:
I ran, tet.t.r b • .I•
,zed by lonisab,s• •.1!
'almtr, for hit V•rer • • 11,j.
birn,:if on ycllArd, %•••
•
so
tad elevett months
nrntt, atd fe ion 04 IL"
..f his Cgs: witiCh tv vt.l
in kogl.nd. wl
and owes months co at
d on hay seed-, sta
nl
one tnont s old lon 31'1
rongr ua brith,turn . 111(
ytar oIJ litseLt at
•
'arm.
lateen weeks ell, ti
vkl, br J l y biro.
' ktlJ MSC month! o' 1
bboge.
bee?, bredby Mr. • ki
so Pins, Arse moo 10
wad awl Eon b to
basis), u. al.
t•wreks old Pap,io
WI
Rase, grass-fed by h CI
nose tat bilb. of
Mangel-wurzel R. .
mar 3.sitt. kver
nr Clete 'Europe, a. 11
ry 6ne Mabgekivirx. 11
su loos attc ni.ivards
le Burnt 6r:t .nd Tit 1E
Of exemplifying as •
is oweed and A- It
11
ARKETS, DEC. 12. !I
A Rol zo Ss t II
45 0.1 to es
YESTERDAY.
11
41 lOs to St 10.
11 las to 21 4$
os.
tk
law fOCKtrs. of
261 0.t074l ts
161 Of to Sol os c
801 0. S'll Os a
ul
Is Od to 2$ ti
alp 7,. cad.
.se 105 to lob 64
w.:. 4. Ch.: to Si ed. 0
OJ to 0. 01.
Mow 724 a
Itsia 04
r:. (41 rllO
car. 04
1011s—P.uim s4s
14. ISi 0.1
In
rREE
1, au in 406.174 eOl
to 701bs 234 Wid 111
to bulbs Yci ra Po
B Grevolacd sSit 4:d lM
.0, per dos CU. $O5.
lone lodes Ilk! to V 34
- -
MU( 14.
Prices
is. od. to sit, 04.
78. Ott so 46% CIL
Ds. Cd. to ioi.
,VEIL.
4 os 6d.
5 Os cd.
os cd.
3 o. hd. si
,Nca.
co
•
Ia cc it
Inc I.
4;
C. &iv. Meta..
ive per
44
Cif
r:••• 1
£lB of. to di;
r quarter ItR3 to 52.4
II 40 to Sils. 344 I