Star.
London, England, 1829-12-05 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, Dec. 4.
The Loco Cswicaitos. commenced the Sittings after Term,
in Lincoln's Inn Haikthis morning. It being the first seal, his Lord-
ship was engaged the whole of the morning in bearing motions.

- -
CARDSDALI K 3111/1111.1T.
The Sottcrrosi-Genznat. applied for a special injunction to re.
strain the Defendant from selling or disposing of a quantity of gas-
ometers, which be had manufactured, they being an infringement
on the patent right of which the Plaintiff was the Assignee. It
appeared that some years since the Defendant sold the patent right
of.tbi. invention to the Plaintiff, and that until lately, gasometers
being in but little demand, it had turned out any thing but lucre-
the. Recently, however, the demand had been very great, and
the consequence was that the Defendant manufactured them him.
self. The Plaintiff bad recovered against him for the infringement
of the patent, in a Court of Law, and he now sought thesutho.
rity of this Court to restrain him from disposing of those he had
by him till after the expiration of the patent. After some con-
versation the injunction was granted.

CAPADALS V. THI OAS ANS COEN COMPANY.
The Souctroa-Gzszaat. applied for, and obtained a similar in-
junction against this Company.
-

Mr. Beams applied for a inonth's dine to put in the answer to
this bill.

The Soucy:ea-Gamut was willing to allow a fortnight, in
ease Mr. Beams would pereniptotily engage to put in the answer
by that time.
After some discussion, Mr. Beames agreed to take a fortnight.
VICE CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Dm. 4.
1117C11111111 ♦. COMM'S •ND OTHIRS.

This case, which was argued at considerable length last Satur-
day, was an application far an injunction to restrain Mr. Charles
Clarke from prosecuting an action that he had commenced against
the Commissioners, in a cummluion of rebellion that bad been
issued against Mr. Henry Clarke, to recover a compensation in
damages for trespass and false imprisonment. The circumstances
of the case have been too recently before the public to need repeti-
tion. At the conclusion of.the arguments on Saturday, the Vice-
Chancellor said that he strongly Inclined to think that the Injunc-
tion ought to issue, but in consequence of Mr. Bligh's allusion to
something that dropped front the Lord Chancellor when Mr.
Clarke was brought up to be discharged from the custody of the
Warden of the Fleet Prison, he wished before he prohounced anal
judgment, to confer with his Lordship.
Upon his taking his seat this morning, the Voce Cnaucexxou
said that he bad had an interview with the Lord Chancellor, and
be was authorised by his Lordship diatinctly to say, that he bad
used no such expressions as those attributed to him; onite coo-
irary, that Learned Judge agreed with him, the Viee-Cliancellor,
in thinking that the injunction ought to issue. A Court et Law
was nit the proper tribunal to judge of the manner ill which a
Commission of Rebellion, ordered by this Court ought to be cu...
cuted The injunction must therefore be granted.
Mr. KNIGHT applied for costs. His client had been compelled
•to come into Court.

The VICIICHANcsuos said that he would defer auk* any
order upns that question. until he saw in what way Mr. Clarke
would bring the ca-e hclurc the Court.