Star.
London, England, 1829-06-25 00:00:00

FRENCH PAPERS.

:...

/ROM TUb GAZITTI DL FRANC; JUNK SS..
PARIS. Jon es.
The Austrian Observer gives the news from Con-
stantinople.,wbich are in substance the same as those
which we have taken from the Augsburg Quoits. The
Russian vessel taken by the Capitals Pacha is a frigate
of 45 guns, with a crew of 400 men, who have been
sent to the Ragnio. Though the Porte has published
nothing official 'respecting the affair of Pravadi. it was
satisfied with the result, for it had bestowed caftans of
honour on the couriers who brought the news. Redbchid
Packs stands so high in the confidence of the Sultan,
that the most extensive powers base been given him for
the management of the war.
The considerable supplies of corn which bad lately
arrived within the capital, as well as the favourable ap-,
pearance of the harvest in the Asiatic proviocesti bad
caused tie price of provisions to fall.
Two Mihmandars, Arni Effendi and Wasik* Medi,
having the rank of CapW_ Ritchie, bad been
'die first to attend upr. Gordon, the se
alstmiert Count GniNiallabt.

to p

Pam Pma—PAus, 3611. IL-4,1111 per Cents 10W. 109 f.
10e. %wt. Jelf. 15e. 10er—Theeper Owe ?OE 20e.—Beek &bd.
1,65010.41ep1es Sae. SSL Lic..ol4yal Spode Les.. 741 C-
- Lew Payments, Mg.—Hayde I.4ese,44sL—Bedisope
en Leiden, ose meek SSE 4Se.; the.. menthe, SSC M.—Owe
altheratiros.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

HOUSE OF LORDS, Juss 24.
The Hone wet at one o'clock, when the Low Cinnamon
&livered Odra= in general appal eases.
ens nut or na: rans. •

Lord HA RDWICKR said. that possibly it might be in the re.
eolketion of some of their Lordships, that id a termer Swan a
Petition had been promoted to the Ham respeetiog the ceedect
of a dergyman in the away of Bedford ; and he sow rose dearly
to give make. that early la the nest Session an application would
be made by lie. Montague Burgoyne, by swans a a pickles. foe
same anwahnent of the Icdesiastical Law, se as to give to the
Bebop of the diocese. or sane ether proper authority, a
power to remove Dr. Free, the recta of Sutton. A lOW
teem had very remade been obtained against him in the
Court of Arches, by whkb he has been deprived of his
Sant bet having More lodged as appeal to the Court of Deli.
gates, he still retail& poswesioa, and may mama may elapse
before he can be Sally szpolkd from k ; bout the Learned Lord
se the Woolsack will have the power to premed delay, by appoint.
leg the delegates at an early period. Lord Hardwick* added, that
a Right Rev. Prelate had been diatom of giving notice of Ws fa-
lsetto& of Winging in a Bill in the ant Session for the amendment
of the Feelesiastkel Law. as he would. have Weaself stated if he
had been presept in.the House, and be trusted the Pleasure would
be such as would meet the support of his Majesty's Ministers.
The LORD CHANCELLOR promised that, as far as be was
emsconamk no delay amid take .pkee. The Comadsaisa would
be Ina* est at sae, bock was impossible ter Wm to say whether
the Learned Judges named is k could hear the case before the cir-
cuit. Tbf probability was, that it woeW be decided in November
Term. After the deckles of the Coat of DelegAtes,toweeer, it
amid be open to E. Feet, if they decided against Was, to *Woo
the LerAghpereike foe scow4xtess of review, by which a fa-
ther delay would be coated. In fact, the case might be further
protracted let eight or sine months.
The Duke of Wasannvost. are entered the Houle, upon which.
Lord HARDW ICIER said, he was gate was the Learned Lord
would oedema topmast vemehue easy, observing; that kaas
the oars necessary as 11r. Free, is &Sala et the sentence of the
Court of Arches, bad returned to Botta, ad had preached a see.
men last Sunday, in which he compared himself to St. Pea, re-
prolamin himself as a persecuted and deserted man.
The Duke of MILLINGTON aid, that he had hog kit the
defect dila Ilerirdartical Law la am Area a more *area-
' doss relief is such cases as that leaded to by the Noble bad,
sad proodad to give Me assistance in precedes an amendment
of it.

THE WESTMEATH CASE.
PETITION OE THE MARCHIONESS.

Th• following Petition was initesday presented to the
Loftli, in hoholf of her Ladyship :
IMOMAS JOIN MARQUIS OF WESTMRATII. AFFELLART,
APR JAMU MARQUIS OF SALIBRURT, AUID OTIIRRS,
RISTOINDRIITS.
Is Ms Mass

Ism miss MUT,' AL £ saneam.

• The Odds. se Mom Wssasseassi, one or
the Ramessitems. .. _
Intewethur.That ►by an Order of your Lordships. pro.
noonced on the 23d July in the Session of last year on
Ibis appeul, K .sr ordered to stand for further consi. ,
deratioa to the second cause day ip the present Session.
That at the time of making that order an appeal,
brought by the above-named appellant, against a decree
of the Arches' Court of Canterbury. by which a sea-
tepee of divorce between your petitioner and the said
appellant was passed on the ground of cruelty practised
by the said appellant towards your, petitioner, wax de.
pending before the High Court of Delegates. That
the facts and the law in the case so appealed against
were precisely similar to those upon which the pee-
sent appeal must be decided by your Lordships ; and
that the, grounds staled in your Lordships' House
for mukiog the said,Order of Adjournment were, that
it was thought:uecessary fur your Lordships, iu order
to come to a satisfactory conclusion, to watt lentil the
final decision of the question in the Ecclesiastical Courts
had been pronounced. That such final decision was
pronounced on the 18th of April last, when the Judges
of the High Coon of Delegates decreed that the Judge
from whom the said appeal was brought 61 had pro-
ceeded rightly, justly, and lawfully, and they affirmed
the decree or septeace appealed from."
That your petitioner. as soon as possible after the said
decision was obtained, applied to your Lordships to fix
a day for further considering this appeal, when your
Lordships were Olcoveid thereupon to order the same to
be further considered on the 18th of May last.
That thereupon the appellant, actuated as your
petitioner believes, by no other motive than by delayiog
Nta termination of this appeal beyond the present Ses-
sion, to impede the kudos of your Lordships' decision.
and to harass' your petitioner with the expenses and
delay necessarily atteadan; upon further litigation. pre-
sented a petition to his Majesty in Council, praying for
a Commission of.Reeiew of the sentence of the Coen
of Delegates, in which be alleged that the matter in
dispute " is sot simply a question of fact, but depends
chiefly on points of matrianostiallaw much controverted,
OW of deep importance to the general interests 011
society, respecting which the deliberate judgments of
the Consistcuial Courts of London sod of the Arches
Court of. Canter bury are sit4usetrically opposed to each
other, and respecting which there is just real sn to
believe that the Judges in the High Court of Delegates
were by no means unanimous;" and that b tying pre..
seated such last-Mentioned petition to his Majesty, the
said appellant thou applied to your Lordsaips to have
the huller consideration of this appeal postponed.
That your petitioner explicitly denied the statements
contained ip the last mentioned petition of the said ap-
fella% to be true, and prayed you, Lordships to COW

sider this appeal without further delay ; but your Lord-
ships being of opinion that the question which bid be:
depending before the Court of Delegates, (and which
was the original ground of your Lordships ordering the
consideration of this appeal to be adjourned) remained
undetermined until the result of the said appellant's
application to Ms Majesty for a Commission of firlieW
should be decided. were pleased on the 15th day of May
last further to adjourn the consideration of the appeal.
That at length the said application for a Commission
#.l Review. atter having been fully beard before the
Right Hon. the Lord Chancellor, to whoa his Majesty
was pleased to refer the same, has been decided Grip
and his Lordship has reported to his Majesty that, after'
a full and attentive coasideration of this case, of the
evidence. and of all that bad been submitted to his Lord-
ship's atteotioo by Counsel, or had occurred to himself
frith respect to it, and adverting to the rules and
eiples by which his Lordship's predecessors had beau
'governed ippon applications f sr Commissions of Review
it did net appear to hicLordship that the cue ateb:
fished Go the part of tb6 petitionerld)e said appellant
was such as to make it espedian that his. Majesty
grant a Commission of Review ; and that thereupon his
Majesty was pleased, oo the 22d June instant, with the
advice of his Privy Council, to approve of the Lord
Chenatiloes said report, and to order that no Commission
of **eves should be granted; and that the said petition
rshoeld be dismissed.
That your Lordships' petitioner submits that the K-
ith of the said application for the Commission of Re-
view confirms the denial which your petitioner offered
to your Lordships of the truth of the statements con-
tained in the said appellant's petitiosss and justifies her
in imputing to the said appellant the designs of endea-
vouring to delay the decision of this appeal beyond the
present Session. and to exhaust her means and filament
her efforts to obtain justice from your Lordships.
That your petitioner earnestly craves your Lot&
ships' attention to the hardships of her situation and the
pi/wankel she has endured from the said appellant;
that it is now more than ten years since she has boa
separated from her husband, the said appellant. such
separation being caused by his cruelty towards her.
That it has been determined by three successive judg-
ments of the Consistorial Court of London, the Dean
of the *idles, and by the High Court of Delegates
(which last mentioned decree has been confirmed by the
Lord Chancellor's Report,„and his Majesty's order there-
upon respecting the appellant's before mentiooed peti-
tion for a Commission of RevieW), that the said
appellant had been guilty of cruelty towards your
petitioner. and had repeatedly beaten and struck her.
That during the whole of the said period of ten years,
since their separation. your petitioner has never received
any puniest from the said appellant under the deed
which. as defendant in this suit, she seeks to have esta-
blished, or any other payment by way of alimony, or
otherwise. for or towards that maintenance which as
his wile she is entitled to; that during
.the greater
part of the said period she has been involved in
harassing and expensive litigations of various kinde
raised by the said appellant; that in June 1819, the
said appellant filed a bill in the Court of Chancery
in England, praying that the deeds of settlemebt and
separation might be cancelled and declared void, in
which he obtained an injunction which was afterwards
dissolved, when the said appellant abandoned that suit.
and his bill was dismissed, for want of prosecution, with
costs, which costs to this day remain unpaid. That
besides the expenses your Lordships' petitioner has been
pet to in the last.mentioned suit, in this suit. and in
others, there are now due to her for costs untaxed in
the Consistory Court 1,0361. 12s. 2sl. and in that in the
Arches' Court 4871. and for tiled costs in the proceed-
ings before the Court of Delegates, 2011.45. Bd. which
latter sum the said appellant has been dissected to pay
by a monition from the last mentioned Court duly served
upon him. That your petitioner has bees besides es-
,posed to the costs attendant upon opposing the said
appellant's petition for Commission of Review, the
whole of which she must personally bear, it not being
the course of the practice to grant costs to either party
oo such application.
That your petitioner looks to your Lordships decision
as the only means of extricating her from the painlul
and undeserved suffering she has now for so long a
Anse endured, for relieving her from the ruinous booth's
of enpense she has laboored under, and for placing hte
is the possession of that income which the appellint
*Nod te supply her with, not less by his own widen
and deliberate engagements, than by the laws of tiPe
lead-
That for these reasons. and because the whole of the-
me has been fully discussed and investigated before
your Lordships. and was postponed only for the pur-
lieu of obtaining that fiord decision of the appeal be.
len the Court of Delegates, which has now been pro-
nounced arid Aimed, your petitioner earnestly hopea
that your Lordships will pass a conclusive resolution on
Ibis appeal before the present Session terminates, and
net expose your petitioner to the delay and ezpense,and
inconvenience. which mum be occasioned if it shall be
further postponed.
Your petitioner therefore prays yourberdships to take
this appeal into your Lordships immediate consideration
and d.cide thereon forthwith.
And year petitioner will ever pray.
HOUSE 'OF COMMONS.