Star.
London, England, 1820-10-06 00:00:00

~_

•

THE QUEEN.

•
FOURTH DAY OF THE DEFENCE.
HOUSE OF LORD&

The LORD CHANCELLOR took his seat on the woolsack
at ten o'clock.
Prayers having been read, the roll was called over.
The LORD CHANCELLOR read a letter of apology from
his Royal highness the Duke of Ydkx, who stated that he
was so indiaposed, that be could not attend.
The Marquis of LANSDOWN, then moved that Jusyl.
Merida should be called
• Mariette, presented himself at the bar.
. The Marquis of LANSDOWN—" Mr. Marietti, h: vy• y,
now brought the letter with you which you mentioned to tl,
House yesterday you bad received from DI Alberta:ler
Mastrers--" I have : here is the letter. I beg to mention
to your Lordships, that, on going home yesterday afternoon, I
found that I had been wrong in saying to your Lordships that
sell the letters to me bad come by post. I discovered that on,
of them, that of the 16th October, came by a private occasion.
I hope your Lordships will excuse this unintentional mutate:'
The letter Was handed to the Clerk, and Mr. Marietti wish.
drew. Counsel were now called In.
Toddler ireminatiot gf Ledy Ca (Juarez Lomsay.
Dr. LUSUINGTOS directed that Lady Coasaorre Lanns.v:
should be re.ealled. _ _

Her Ladystlp was handed to the Bar by Mr. VIZARD,
Majesty's Solicitor, and, as on yesterday, indulged with a sea:.
Oroaserausinni i ske Kima's Socienon.Gzszass.
Ds► you know that there is a garden in the neighbourhood .
Naples coiled IA Favorite P—Yes, there is.
Did you ever walk in that garden with her Royal Highness'
—Yes, one day.
Was Bergami also present ?-11e *as.
Did your Ladyship, in going from Naples to Rome, travel La
the same carriage wish her Royal Highness ?—I did.
Did Bergarni ride as courier during that jeterney?-11e
Did you also travel in the same carriage from Rome ?—I

From Rome to Civita Vecchia ?—Yes, I did.

Did Ilergami also ride as coorier during that part of the jour.
ney ?—I believe he did. but I am not so accurate in my Tv...A.
leetion of this as of the former part of the journey.
Do you recollect. during the former part of the journey, Bcr-
, gami coming sip to the window of the carriage and saying. .1 &v...
ifartawie ?—Yrs, after he was called, when her Royal High-
ness gave him some of the provisions in the carriage, as ai.J
something to drink.
have you & distinct recollection that it was after be was
that he came up 7-1 thiok it certainly was after he was called.
Is there any circumstance which enables your Ladyship at
pronounce with certainty that it was se ?-ICo. Merely becaLe
it was more natural that he should come after he was caPpid.
Then I am to understand that you hive no recoliccrion.rith.:
. .
one way or the other, and that your stating that it was afar : e
was called is a mere inference from reasinil,4 in 'imp' Or. a
mind,?—lt is : there was nothing Knack pie as piiiiculak in the

circuinsa.au.,c.
Wu there any bottle In the naafis* witlcli be/ !loyal MO.
near banded i bottle of Wine.
DA heedritik free tbOi. batle?-*-1 think he diB. '
From the bottle itself;nfiltent 'any glass?—Yes, I think

• -
Did he afterwards iittten the bottleto her Rani Iligiuwo?
—I am not (Inks positive ; I fancy he did, but I ant:by to
means positive. Her Royal Highness and I bad titbits our r.
freshment before, but whetter be returned the bottle or three
it away I cannot be certain.
Although you are not certain, which way was it amorally*
the best of your recollection ?—I rather think he remessid it t 4
the carriage.
After yciu had made up your mind to quit her Royal
ness, did you not state that it was a vast relief to your mind to
bave come to that resolution have no recollection of kavis4
said so.
Did you recollect ever saying ay:thine to that purpose sr
of ?-..1410 ; I migba have said so, hut Ido not. haw that I
ever did.

I beg to s,sk Tour Ladyship more pankcularly, whether, after
You gad awns to the determination to leave.the .ervlce of tut
Royal Highness, you did not say that k was a wan Mist soTcor
mind, and that-yen considered that no woman ws had any fe-
gut to her character could retrain Id the sere* of her Roy
Highnese?—eCettalnly, I 4o not rustolluet haehigneer stegedasy
such thing in such Wands,
Did you ever my anything to that eireet !Iraqi%
Will you undertake to. ay dot 44 not state the Teri
words flume now glade ass of 7-1 have no recollection el
having Awed enT suds words. . _

Ant I then to understand, that you WM sot undertake to
say that Tog dfd. not make lee of those very wordo-1 can say
I did net awake use of any math words. Ido not tn.sadlett dot
I did.

The Souritana,Gamosati. reputed the giseition.
I can only sayvit ft ems:early impubablo I shim* hue nude
use 'of such words, I do stout asudioct that I did. •
Your Ladyship will not ray that you did sot make use if
them ?—I can only say again, tbat I ire no recollection, and
.that I think it very improbable.
Will you swear that you did sot Ste use of words to that
effect more than once 7—l hue SW tledlectisa of having used
words to that effects •1. .;•• •
But you will not undutaktiii-***l4lhildisot/—I on
only say as below, that I haUsantitstillbililllkoi'llwiwg said s°,
and Ido not think it protoblif.' - • • i*
Do you recollect, When you quitted the 'Stroke of her Rola
I Highness, saying this : that if you had not had an anxious desire
to mist a particular individual out of the Savings of that service,
you would have left long before?—lt is wry possible • I might
have' said so, but I duel recollect An I did.
Will your Ladyship sualenake to bay positively that yoo did
mot ?—i can only say IlsaVsfolat.tht kilt recolleuion of Pavia{
said so to anybody. 1. *.4 •
Lusionsaux.
The Sollcitas:Qmsoral aikaid your tadyshipwhother any Com.
=sanitation had Ulm place at to year "aloud= ; to who
was that cossosirdistion madeN—To' any husband. -
To any ooit'elsaUTO no-obi el*. • - •
Is Mr. LlodsaftspervOsilirdistraistauttostancea
Has he been hag distressed circuotusoceir?-600se years
• Have ever orry'dllicildestalen *bile you were in tar
Majesty's service, u to thC paitneot of 'olio Ladyship's salarY?
The SoLICIIOII-GXXCRAL objected to this qtaestion,as not ho-
ing any application to wharhad taken place in the course of tte

' .

Mr. Baovonsx said it was-meant to shear, by that count of
examination, that there existed entbarrasiments to tender ha

Ladyship's stay in the Queen's service disagreeable.
Dr. Losonsurom said lehod born attempted to its an 'inputs'
floes upso Tier Majesty by the cross-examination. It became
necessary to eiplain the reasons het Ladyship bad for *WI"
the situation disagreeable, in *Order to remove any wrong ISt
premien which might be received to her Majesty's prejudice.
Lord LAUDERDALE-For the sake i order, the wls..

V

%

Psis avail
Irani `el
The So
Counsel fa
filth he I

The wit
pet, wheth
Wary ? Ye
Did any
lated to eel
able ?--[Hi
which was

Had yai
lea two.

Wert the;
—Yes.

I beg to
thin in th
ieetY,coin
)pereetve as

Lord L
jesty tee i
firmest=
you had ad
ever a per

That le
time that
Proristl

What pi
you joined

Did be
account of
Was thl

Did he

Was Co
ber 'Ma*
Was in the

At the 1
vice of be
•one havin

Was Be
her servio

Did a a
aware of.
Do yol
Naples T-.

Do you
I 4.3 isot.
Do you
ter Royal
Do you
rine; bein

You sai
Princess,
No, lasi
Was tb

sdr. BO
The L
admitted
ites to

Sid al
ruin GC
bat gar
I Wag
nem, vilki
grating*
induie m

Laid 1
. et heal
—1 cam

' tart
- list

met

Safi