Star.
London, England, 1826-05-18 00:00:00

GOSS'S WOIIKS:
Hontinemr=a nostta sapit.
Ow page to soan...-Maanat.

Just Put&Wl, rice Ss. in halals, &stealth Edition,
1. rPHE )EGIS of LIFE; a Non-Medical Commen-
taryJi. on the indiscretions arising from Human Frailty, in
which the Canes, Symptoms aid baneful Elects of Lows Va
aces, Gadget ban, Stricture, Seminal Weaknesi, ikc. are fully de-
vloped; Part it embraces Practical Observations on Sexual
Debility, Self-Abuse, and Mental Irritation. with some iota saki%
Observations on Vegetable and Animal Life; in Part 111. is a
Series of Cases illusuative of the preceding subjects, explaining
them in a familiar manner.—By GOSS aid Ca Consulting Sur-
geons, London.

Natura beatis
Omnibus ease dedit, si quis cognomrit uti.—Cuannax: •
Since /leaven io all the fend of Who supplies,
Its 'frugal applicatMa.marks the wise:
I. Hromams. a NeMMedical Analysis of some Complaints Inci-
dental to Females, in which are offered some iinpartast admoni-
tions ea the peculiar debilities attending their circummeeisei, 'pa-
pa**, and formation: The subject of Sterility is especially dieek
upon. Interesting and important cases. illustrate the subject.
Qino legit Venus? Hen ! %nave color decens.
Hor. Lib. 4. Od. 12.
Whither Ries Love? Ah ! where the charming bloom ?
The above may be had of Sherwood, Gilbert, and Piper. WI, Pa-
ternoster-row ; Chapple,s9, Pall-man ; &W. Forel, 44, Piccadilly ;
Oellow and Wilson, 16, Prloces-strect, corner of Gerrard-street,
igolto; T. and a Unarriegod,,32, Fleet-street; Higbley and Soo;
174, Fleet-street ; Onwlyn,. 4, Catherine-street,' Strand,' London ,
Matthew and Stevenson, Burks and Kinnebrook, Norwich; B.
Deck; Ipswich , Dutton,. Bury St. Edmund's ; corm
wee, Bristol; Jiartatt, and Duffield, Bath; Hatt, ;.
Todd, Briggate, Liras ; • Wrightson, Birmingham
Exeter; Wolstenhohne, YJrI ; Gore, Lim:pool; Haire', Ilan.
.ciester ; hliPhun, 155, Troncate, fasgoW ; 9, Calton-alrects
Edinburgh; Porter, 72., Grafton street, Dublin; and byall Wake
eallers—(Price Ss.)
Messrs. cuss andStam to be cpmnifedi as usual, eery=
their. house ; and Patieritsln the country am requhayed" to
minutely the case, enaluiing a remittance for and Andichnly*
which can aqforwarded to any 3art of the Werid. •
G OSS and •Om 31.11.0 Surgeons, Nea 14 Bilavaitowest, The •
meet, kondogu

PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS.

HOUSE OF LORDS, NAT 17.

The Earl of MA LMRSBURY presented Petitions from Muddi-
ford, In the County of Suffolk, and Brim, In the County of Kent,
teal* the aseassues now in progress *the introduction of foreign
Chris. The Petitioners anticipated the meet grievous results to
tbmisselvea from them measures, and hoped the House would not
pass them.—Laid ea the table.
Lord CA WDOR presented a Petition front an individual of the
name of Hutebbssen Bell, against the System of Grand Juries in
Ireland.—Laid on the table.

The Earl of LAUDERDALE presented a Petition from the
Synod of Eak and Tmietdale, against the continuation of Negro
Slavery.—LaW on the table.
• The Noble Earl also presented Petitions from various Parishes
In the County of Suffolk, against any alteration in the Corn Laws.
Laid on the table. .

Lord Cues, and others from the Commons, brought up Mimi
Prints Bills, which were read a first time.
Oa the motion of the Earl of Lamm; the Irish Local Juris..
.diction Rill was read a third time, and passed.
Mr. Towns, from the Treasury. presented Returns of the
quantity of Corn and Flour imported from NOS to the present
time.—Laid ea the table.—Adjourned.
MONTGOMERY AND OTHERS, THE SURVIVING EXECUTORS
AND T.AUSTIES OR THE LATE DUKE OP QUEENS-,
BERRY, APPELLANTS—MARQUIS OR QUEENSBERRY

RESPONDINT.
''his was an appeal from the Courts of Scotland. The
facts of the case were these. The late Duke of Queens-
' berry succeeded, in 1778, to certain estates under an
entail, executed in 1769, by his cousin, the preceding
Duke of Queensberry. This entail restricted the powers
I of the heirs iirgraating leases in the following way—
that it shaft of be lawful to am of the said heirs to
set tacks, or teases of thes4id !andel or any parrthereof,
for any longer space than nineteen years, and without
any diminution of the rental, or for the letter's lifetime,
in case of any diminution of the rental; and that it
shall not be lawful to any of the slid heirs to take
grasswns (fines) for any tack, or lease to be granted by
them, but to set the said lands and estate at such rea-
sonable rents as can begot therefor, so that the succeed-'
ing heirs may not be hurt, or prejudiced, by the heir in
possession setting the lamb at an undervalue, or taking,,
by way of grassum, what falls annually to be paid out
of the lands." The penalty attached to the disobedience
of their prohibition, was the loss of all right or interest
in the said lauds, and that the leases so granted should
become null an/ void. The late Duke, however, ac-
cepted the renunciation of the current leases, and let
new ones at an increased rent; in consequence of which
the present Marquis brought an action against the
Trustees in 181% claiming damages of 1500301. on
eccquut. of no less Orin 110 (arms. The alleged ground
action was, that Isttias .tke. leases before the aid

ones expired, all competition with the tenant in posses-
sion was prevented, so that the lands could not be let
at the best rent which could be got, and that the renun-
ciation of the unexpired terms of the old leases were so
many virtual grassums paid to the landlord in conside.
ration of the new lease which was subitituted. This
ac ion give rise to proceedings in the-Courts below,
which -lasted for some years, when it was decided in
favour of the Marquis of Queensberry, limiting hirclains
only upon those leases which, if not surrendered, world
have been subsisting at the time the action was cons-
' menced. This decision was appealed against to the
House of Lords in 1820, but was affirmed, without pie-
' jodice to any action or actions that might be afterwards
brought on account of the ether leases. An action was
again brought on one of the leases for the sum lost by
the renunciation of the old lease ; and the principle, as
applicable to the others, was again discussed,_when
the Courts below again held, that the respondent under
the prohibiting clause, had a right to recover ; and this
decision was a second time appended against. Trap** at lane
was the right of the heir to recover by action of damage*, when a
different penalty was /niched to the violation of the prohibitory
clause. It was considered to be a very novel sort of aetien.—
Judgment deferred.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.
Mr. WARR E presented a Petition ftslim the Planters of. Saint
Vincent and Dominica, praying the ti uise to appoint a Commis-
sion, to inquire ou the spot into the eendisimi ' The
Petitioners stated that ld many pans they were•wealthy. At,Tor-
cola, for instance, a suns of 20,0001. was possessed mon* six thou-
sand slaves; and throughout the labile et Weft Initles, the
slaves held property, ihtot by least by
_ Thaays
which amounted to a aunt of beeppraitilisi aree twists.
Ordered to be printed.
Sir A. CAMPBELL presented a front Glasgow, pray-
ing for a reduction in the duty of n r...Laid.on the table.
The Debtor and Creditor Artatigesama VW was read a this%
time and passed.

1111F9RTATioN oF FOREIGN CORN SILL. •
Mr. CHAPLIN presented Petitions front several Parishes in
Lincoln, against the admission of foreign Corn. —Ordered to be
Printek
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the Or-
der of the Day forlsringiag up the Report of the Committee es the
Bin for the importation of foreign Corn.
Oa the question being put by the Sisals%
Sir T. LETHBRII)GE said, that as this was the last
.pportnnity he should have of making any observations
on the measure before the House, he should avail him-
self of it for the purpose of saying s word or two. He
felt that it was useless to oppose the measure, and he
should not, therefore, interrupt it by adopt'ng any
course merely vexatious. He was fully aware of the
very large and powerful majority his Majesty's Minis-
ters bad commanded in this House, and he could net
shut his eyes either to the eqaally strong-support it bad
received in another place. Under these circumstances
he should not press Ministers to give any pledge (for in
point of fact they had given one already) that nothing
which had been done in regard to this measure should
hereafter prejudice the question of the C.irn Laws. He
aroul.:have called on them to enter into the pledge at
this moment' if he had cot undcrstn,sl all that had been
said in the House and elsewhere to mean that this
measure was to answer a pecoPraw exigency, and was
not a sample of any future Measures which. Ministers
contemplated carrying into effect next Session, when
they stood pledged to make some alteration in the Corn
Laws as they at present stood. The duty now proposed
(and which, notwithstanding what might have been said
to the contrary, he contended was not equal to that of
1822, when it was 17s. it being now only 125.) was pro-
posed merely to afford relief to certain districts, and
they did not mean it to prejudice the general question.
There bad been efforts made in certain quarters to inti-
midate him from pursuing the course he had intended ;
but these efforts he despised. The opinion, he had pre-
sumed perhaps to ex,rress, he had troubled the House
with, because be thought it his duty to do so, and no
indmidations, however gross, personal, or dangerous, could have
induced him to have neglected it. The personality exhibited to-
wards him, ha would repeat, only excited his indignation and con-
tempt. Having said this, he would not take up the time of the
House by going into the question at its present stage ; be would only
repeat that he protested against any future proposition being
grounded on the utte now before the House. He hoped Ministers
would recollect that a pledge to this effect bad been given both is
the face of the Howe and the country, and they could not at 'any
futate period, in justice to the House and their own characters,
depart from it.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER had no
hesitation in saying, with respect to the mode in which
the proceedings of this year had been effected, that Mi-
nisters had repeatedly given a pledge that it was not to
be considered the foundation for a course to be pur-
sued next year—(Hear). To violate such a pledge would
be the shabbiest departure from their engagements.--
(Hear). The measures they had proposed ought not and coSIO sot
prejudice the free discussion contemplated. With respect to the
intimidation referred to the Hon. Baronet, be (the Chancellor of
ibe Exchequer) would say that it was quite consistent with his
character to treat it as he did.

Mr. H. SUMNER said, that though he snuck ad-
mired the general conduct of Ministers,, he still con-
sidered that in proposing the measures now before the
House, they did what was neither wise as a mode of
relief, nor properly conducted, if it were wise. He
wished to say a word me:plain why he had divided the House the
other evening, this course having. been considered u vexations. Hie
object was to give time to his constituents to petition the House
against going into a Caionsittee on the MIL A meeting did take
tee fat this rupee ea Saturday, but it was too late to elect what

Mt R. HERON mid, that the -BM wombd not do ndecisief, it
omould be inoperative. He was, however, so opposed to it, that if
he met with any encouragement he would now divide the House.
The Ripen was then brought up and read, and the BW ordered
to be engrossed, and read a third tintotoaserrow. •
W A IRRNOUSRD CORN.
On the question being pat, a that the Report .f the Committee
on the Warehoused. Corn Bill be brought up.'
Sr R. HERON said he must object to a measure which, with-
out offering any advantage, would put se much into the pockets ot
the holders of bonded corn. It was a singalu fact, that the prim-
dpal number of these persons who would be most omitted, warp •
persons residing in Liverpool.
Mr. HUSKISSON said the Hon. Member sekined to refer to
hint ( Mr. Haskisson), as the Representative of liverpo•L He might
just as reasonably charge the Hoe. Baronet's opposiffon to hie being
atmididate he some great agricultural intermt—(lltar, bear.)
Mr. BEN ETT thought hie Hon. Friend was justified in rif.rriug
to Liverpool, when it was comidered that it held eOpoo racists,
which was the largest proportion of bonded Coro. Eb objected t.
the Bill, because, without offering any equivaleut, .111000110 won Id
be lost to the country and put into the pockets of chrs.diadura. He
should not object to the country bolas such a Ain, if it woad re-
lieve the distressed, but be did not think-the BM.lield Gm any sack
Report
Tile Report was then Anoxia ip end read, and Bill ordered
to be engrossed, and read a !birdEme to-likerfow.'

t •-.