Star.
London, England, 1803-05-02 00:00:00

Receiving Rips - • 7 0 7 3
Serviceable, and repairing fee kr-

vice -
In Ordinary
Duildien .

'3 es $ 2
Es 9 86 64

14 a 11 9

Teta - NO ss St 7 101 I 'u
STATS Or TSB OIDiNAILT AT
Partinssali - - 31 s 13 13 1

Plymouth
auultorn

Sheer aefe
River

Total •

- 33 1 so Si I 77
- 31 64! 4 66

3 o 6 7 I ii
3 0 19 z 6 1 4

sof 9 99 61 1 $74

CORN MARKET. MARK.I,4IaI MAY 2.

There was no very Material fbpply of Corn to-
day, nor any alteration of confequence in prices.
Wheat has, for very bell famples of white, obtained
about is. per quarter.—Barley, with difficulty,
has gone off at the terms of this day week.—
Rye has no alteration.—Oats, Beans, and Peas,
alto may be quoted on the fame terms as this day
week.

Fnglifh Wheat, per gr. sos. 535. Fine 6is 63s
I i Dantzie Wheat, sos. 565.
Rye, 345. 365.
Barley, 225. 245. (Superfine) 255. 6d.
Malt, 425. 466.
Oats, 15$. 20t. 213. 6d
Horfe Beans, New, 3os. 325. Old 345 361
_ _

Tick Beans, New, 255. 275. Old 32; 332
Hog Peale, 28s. 3os.
Boilers, 4os. 41.1.

Carraway Seed, 445. to 475. per cwt.
Coriander, zBs. to 3os per cwt.
Canary, 71s. to 745. per qr.
Rape Seed, 341. to 361. per hit.
Flour, 431. 481. per fack.

►ROY TOR LONDON OAZ!TTS, SATURDAY, A►RIL 30.
Average price of Corn in England and Wales, from the Re
taros ending the sad dly of April, 1803.
Wheat. I Rye. I Barley. I Oats. - " -
s. d. s. eh s. 4. s. d.
56 6 35 11 23 z 1 19 6

Deans. Pears.
s. 4 s od.
32 s 36 7

The average Pelee of Sugar. computed from the Return,
made in the week ending tle s7th of April, 1803,6 Ott. 6id.
per hundred weight.

PRICES OF ONAIN. AT Tfft FOLLOWING 111 _ .

Bostoortotte.,--Viheat 34s od to 62. od per Quarter.
Barley aos od to 138 601 I Beans Sts od to 34s od
Oats tos od to 23s od I Peale sos od to oos od
MAI .--Wheat 381 od to 6ys od per qutrter.
Barley 22s col to Iss 6d I Beans 321 od to 34. 6d
Oats 195 od to 135 od Pea& 3/14 ad to 426 6d
NtWooar.--Whait, 435. od. to 635. 6d. per Quarter.
Barley 104 od to 134 od I Beans 301 od to 32s od
Oats tBl 6d to iss od Peafe 22s od to 321 od
Hant.ev.—What 325 od to 641 od per Quarter.
Barley lls od to 16s od I Bates ills od to 311 od
Oats z7s od to 143 od Peck 315 ad to 37$ od
Rsaosmo.--Wlteat 525.64. to 645. od. per %tarter.
Barley sos od to aes 6d Beans 315 od to 331 od
I Oats spa ad so ass od Pare oos od to 009 od

At Warminfler, on Saturday, the prices of Corn
were as follow : Wheat, by the quotes-, t6s. od.
to 31. 25. od. Barley, H. 35. od. to 11. 6s. od.
Oath tl. to tl. 3s. Beans, tl. 145. to al.

On Monday let, at the Curragh of Kildare, Mr.
Wu at ar's herfe Buffer beat the Marquis of Do.
et GALL'S hods Curb, over the four mile courfe,
for the Gold Cup.
King jobs, as altered by Dr. Vatry, and per-
fortned by his pupils at Reading, is fliortly to be
performed, for a benefit, at Covent Garden.
At Munriam's benefit, on Friday, there was a
new Farce, intitled, "All': fair or Love," in which
a lawyer is tricked out of his daughter by his own ,
legal confent, obtained refpeaing a cafe in which
he does not conceive himfelf to be a party—an old
joke, but well managed. The fun of the piece
lay principally v jth lilusnan and Fawcavr.
LONDON YASNIONI TOR MAT,PRODI C Dauacs—
Round elrefs of blue Cambray muffin, with a long train, large
lace yell, flowing look.
Round muffin dirsk,with an embroidered lart.handherchief.
A muffin or lam thaw!, lined with coloured 01k, and richly
embroidered. Straw hat with dome crown, adorned with oak
loaves and wheat ears.
Muffin doers Large orsoge-coloured filk French cum,
with a pale bue border. Straw glpky hat, tied with blue.
Drtfs of ;Rae Cambray muffin. Shawl cloak of patent
Ilse, with arm-bola, and worn with the point behind Bon-
net of draw and lilac-coloured
Gensaat. 0 ton Ihawl cloaks and fhawl-
pellet.% worn with the paint behind, and with arm-holes or
Owes, and alto the large plain muffin and fait iltawb of va-
rious colours, have lately been very generally worn. Straw
ham of various patents, particuluty of the dome crown and
Liffey form, are as prenknt uin former Springs. The co.
loured and figured Cambray muffins, chWy !late, lilac, and
blue, are becoming general.
ROYAL. ACADLNY —The members of the Royal
Academy gave their annual dinner on Saturday,
preparatory to the opening of the Erhibition,which
took place this day; at which were prefent, amonglt
others,
General Andreoffi, and seed of the other foreign Ambaik.
don; the Dukes of Norfolk and Leinßer ; Lords Hawkdbury,
Pelham, and Hoban; the Lord Chancellor, the two Chief
pillion; Lords Riverdale, Roam Spencer, Barrington, Moe-
peek, Naos, the Lord Mayer, ke. the Whops of Durham,
Norwich, Linosia, St. Mogi; &leaks Pot, Grey, Sheridan,
Wititbreaddke.
The CWASCIILLOR of the Meet:Kyle was not
prefent.—The Committee has made a confiderable
alteration in the arrangement of the great room ;
they have cut off the corners, and by placing Tome
of the moll attrative pkteres in the angles, have
added greatly to the beauty of the amp trait
The artills who have molt diftinguaed them-
felees on the pedant occafion are Horttat, Seal,
Lawasuce, Clio., and Bracer, in portraits; Fu-
ses., Timm peon. and Tsasseast, rn hifiory ; and
FAIIIIIL and SirFamicts Bow:tato:l,in lanlfcape.
In oar fucceeding numbers we (hall enter more
fat:the merits and demerits of the different
=CS.
We onderaand the difpute at the Royal Acade-
my has terminated in a drawn battle. The Prefi-
dent has admitted the power of the Council to re-
jell his picture, and they that he did not infringe
on the rules of the Academy by fending it for ex-
hibition-

The following are the Capital Prizes fold and
Blared at bleffrs. HAZARD, Elms', and Co.'s Of.
face, N 0.93, Royal Exchange, in the three Lotteries
foe the year tlios t the laird which fiaillted draw.
ing oo Thurfday the seth alt.:
SHAIRS, Mows;
_

amp iodic November Loamy - . - kss,ooo
1943 lo the late MP - . . sop=
tist6 ditto ditto . ' WOO
31,03 ditto ditto . • - - Bosco
21107 la Amok ditto • . . 1000
111 #45 in Plawaber dim • • • tOOO
31,173 ditto ditto - . - • moo
33,473 is Aura ate . . So)
. Anglo WHIOLS TICKETit
308 lo the hte fesoo
tow II is Nam& ditm . - • tomio
etiot la the N4Priablit Akio • • • Bosco
Owes dkes ditto - - • - jolt
ri,tbg la the Anvil ditto . . . 3000
st.liol is the tote ditto . . . . tote
536! le the Aosta ditto • - - • Soo
/ MN* 1111111 • ! ' • OM

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OP RING', BENCH, APRIL 30.

ASTLEY, BART. O. HAILWOOD, ESQ.:
Mr. GURNEY moved the Court for a rule for a
new trial, in a caufe in which Sir Jacob Miley,
Bart. was Plaintiff, and W. T. Harwood, Efq.
Defendant. It was an anion of flansler tried be
fore Mr. Jullice Grbfe at the Lift afEzes for the
county of Norfolk ; and the declaration Rated,
that in the 'aft Parliament Sir Jacob Aftley had
been Knight of the (hire for the county of Norfolk,
and was, at the time the words were fpoken, a can
didate to reprefent the county at the elation which
was then approaching : and that the Defendant,
contriving and malicioufly intending to caufe and
procure it to be furpedled, thought, and believed
that the Plaintiff was an affallin and a murderer ;
and moreover, that he had been guilty of the moll
horrible crime of murdering his own father, and
as much as in him lay, to lubjeft him to the pains
and penalties provided by the laws of this realm
againft lath a horrible crime, (poke thefe talk,
malicious, and defamatory words--., Sir Jacob
Ailey Is a fcciandrel, a coward, a liar, an affallin,
and a murderer; he murdered his own father."
On the part of the Plaintiff's cafe a witnefs had
been called, who proved the regiller of the burial
of Sir Edward Ailey, and that his death was fome
months prior to the time of tittering the words.—
Another witnefs had Rated he was prefent at a ball,
given at Norwich on the eleEtion of Members for
the city, and a week before the eledlion for the
county took place ; and that at that ball the wit.
nets uttered the words Rated in the declaration.
The witnefs added, that as loon as thcfe words
were fpoken by the Defendant there was a general
hiffing, and he was pulled off from the table. The
caufe did not turn upon the queftion whether the
words were or were not uttered by the Defendant ;
but whether they were uttered with the intent and
meaning charged in the declaration, to impute to
the Plaintiff the commiffion of the crime of murder
in the legal fenfe and acceptation of the term ; or
whether they were meant to impute that which,
however injurious to the charater of the Plaintiff,
could not be made the fubjeft of an anion, he
meant the fhortening his father's life by unkind and
undutiful conduit ? It did not appear that the
death of Sir Edward Miley was fudden or fufpi.
cious, or that there ever exiited in the mind of any
man a doubt as to his having died a natural death,
or an idea that Sir Jacob Alley could be criminally
refponfible for his father's death.
On the part of the Defendant, Mr. Gnaws v raid
he had offered to prove, by perfons who were pre-
fent, when the words were uttered, and who heard
them, that they underftood them in the latter
fenfe ; namely, not as imputing to the Plaintiff the
murder of his father by violence, but imputing
unkindnefs and undutiful conduit towards his fa-
ther, which had battened his death.
When the queftion was put to the witnefs for the
*Plaintiff, who proved the words, it had been ob-
jefted to by Mr. Erskine, and the Learned Judge
allowed the objeBion.
LordEct. am Boaoucn anted what were the terms
of the queftion ?
Mr. Ovum Paid, the terms of the quettion
were, 4, whether the witnefs underftood the De.
fendant meant to impute to the Plaintiff the mur-
der of his father by violence ?" and this queftion
had been objedied to by Mr. Ertkine. The objec.
Lion was full:tined, but the witnefs intimating awn
to anfwer the queftion, Mr. Erfkine withdrew his
°Nation, and the queftion was put by the Learned
Judge. The anfwer was, that he was (truck
with fo much horror, that be put no interpretation
on the words at all." • _ _ _

On the part of the Defendant three witneffes had
been called to prove, that fubfequent to fpeaking '
the words, by the intervention of others, a recon•
ciliation had been effeeed between the Plaintiff and
Defendant ; the evidence was liable to this obfer-
vation, that it was not accompanied by any apo-
logy from the Defendant, but it was attended with
this circumftance—that at the time it took place
the Plaintiff was in the mida of the county elettion,
which was f ly contefted ; that Colonel Har
wood had voted againft the Plaintiff, and was, at
that moment, an aßive partifan in the intereft of
his adverfary, which, upon this reconciliation, he
ceafed to be.

The Learned Coonfel Paid he had alto tendered
the evidence of perfons who were prefent at the
meeting when the words were fpoken, in order to
prove the fenfe in which they underßoOd them, but
Mr. Ertkine was not difpofed to wave his oblation
as before ; he had abjetted to the witnefes being
a&ed what their opinions were as to the fenfe and
meaning with which the words had been uttered.
The Learned Judge being of opinion the oblation
was a good one, he was deprived of that evidence.
He bad other witneffes who would have proved,
that there was not one perfon in the ittrembilxis:
which the words were uttered, who nude
them in the fenfe charged in the declaration, and
in which it was necefary they thould have been
fpoken, in order to fupport the alias. He there-
fore humbly fubmitted to the Court. that their
evidence ought to have been received. The injury
which a party in an anion of this kind came to
complain of, was, the malice with which the words
were fpoken, and the fenfe in which they were
meant to be underßood. There was no context to
explain there words ; for immediately after they
were uttered the Defendant was pulled down, and
one of the witnefes fur the Defendant had Paid, that
the Defendant appeared to be about to explain
them when he was pulled off the table. He bad
confequently no opportunity of adding that context
which would have explained their meaning. If the
witnefes he had offered had been examined, it
would have appeared, that however aaionable the
words in them lees were, they were uttered in ■
fenfe which made them not aaionable.
Lord Ext.anaosouon" Was it (worn, that as
the Defendant was pulled down from the table he
was about to explain the words I"
Mr. Guavas' Paid he would give his Lordihip
the witoefes words: Mr. Ward Paid, es that the
Defendant wasinterrupted and pulled off the table,
and that be appeared to be going to explain
theroton, that whore s partibad ousrodatioaabie

words, and all poffibility of explaining them was
denied him, he ought tribe allowed to giyeevidence
of the fenle in whitii they had been underftwid by
the perfons prefen:. "Vie w:,: d, were uttered in ix
place notextremely fit for loch a fiihjeCt to be men-
tioned; and therefore whatever the perii•ns preterit
might think of the words, and of their truth, they
probably conceiv.:d it was an aR of indecorum to-
wards the affembly to make ufe of them at all in
fuch a place, and therefore they would not allow
the perfon who made ufe of them to proceed, and
to explain them as he was going to do.
Lord ELLEmunanucH—" Was he aelually
fpeaking at the time when he WAS pulled down
from off the tablet"

Mr. Guattav —l. Certainly."
Mr. Juflice GROSE" It may be fn; but I do
not remember that there was any evidenc: to that
effetct."

Mr. GARROW Paid, there was; for it appeared
the Defendant was !landing on the table in the a&
or fpeaking to the ci ropany.
Mr. GIP:NLY Dated that General Money laid
(heti words were received by the company with a
general hifs ; that Colonel Harwood was imme-
diately pulled down; and what (hewed that he was
fpeaking, was the refittance he made to being re-
moved from the table on which he was fpeaking,
and his pufhing down one gentleman who at-
tempted it; a fait which was confirmed by Mr.
Ward's evidence ; that when he was pulled down
he appeared to explain himfelf.
LORD ELLEN soitouc it—.1 Did he fay any thing
after he was pulled down."
Mr. GUILNIT believed nothing was raid then.
He addel, that Dill further to flow the words were
uttered in the fenfe he had given them, he had
tendered another body of evidence of fuch tranf-
aftions between the Plaintiff and his father as
would have eftablifbed the truth of the words in
the fenfe he maintained they were fpoken.
M Juflice GROSE" I under flood you to offer
evidence of what impreftion the words were meant
to convey. I was of opinion the objeflion was
well-founded, and I would not allow the queftion
to be put. Ido not remember the latter body of
evidence beingrendered."
Mr. GURNEY laid, he would bring it to his
Lord(hip's recollection. In the courfe of his ad-
drefs to the Jury he Rated, for two purports; one
(hewing the words were true according to the fenfe
in which he contended they ought to be under-
flood ; and the other, for explaining the meaning
of the Defendant in ufing them ; a deed of null
in which Colonel Harwood, and a Mr. Jones, the
attorney for the Plaintiff, were truftces ; and he
had alfo Dated unkind and infulting treatment of
Sir Edward Aftley, under that deed of truft, by
the Plaintiff Sir Jacob, upon which he fhould have
laid before the Court fuch a body of evidence that
not a doubt could have cuffed as to the caufe of
the death of Sir Edward /Utley.
Lord ELLseamtooc H.—" You could not have

proved that for the purpofe of Chewing the truth of
the words. You could have ufed that only as a
medium of proof of the fenfe in which they were
fpoken."
Mr. Gutless faid he did confider it as a medium

of proof that the words could only have been ut-
tered in the fenfe he had attributed to them, and ,
in the fenfe in which they were underllood by every
perfon who heard them. He had (fated at the
dole of the evidence, which had been received,
that he had evidence to prove the deed of truft,
all the tranfaElions fubfequent to it, and the ill
ufase of Sir Edward Alley by his fon the Plaintiff.
It appeared, he Paid, that Sir Edward Alley
died at an advanced age, and had been ill a con-
fiderable time.

Mr. Juutice GROSt" It was admitted in Court
that Sir Edward Miley died a natural death."
Mr. Goa ms z Paid the Plaintiff's Counfel did not
infill that their Client killed his father. In truth,
no i)er On ever imputed to him the killing him by
violence, there never had been a death more free
from imputation of that kind.
Mr. Emma' obferved, it was the very ground
of the anion, that it was free from imputation.

Mr. Guamsv infifled that no witnefs.could have
been found who underftood the words in the fenfe
imputed to them in the declaration. He could
have produced many who underftood them differ-
ently. He had feveral perfons of the family of Sir
Edward Miley attending who would have proved
fuch fails as would have convinced every body not
only that the words were ufed in the fenfe be con-
tended they were, but that they could not have
been ufed in any other fenfe. The learned Judge
had thought the evidence he had tendered ought
not to be received, and he was obliged to dole-his
cafe, when the Jury found a verdi& for the Plain-
tiff, with aoool. damages.—Damages which, un.
der all the circumftances, were moll exceffive.

,
Lord ELLsmatmouou— 4, Take a Rule to fbcw
cattle."

attirsans. ti tow, IA IMAMS.
Mr. Miss moved for a rule to thew caste why
there mould not be a new trial in this cafe. It
was an adios brought on the Bribery AR, a 4
Geo. 11. cap. 24. to recover a penalty of sooL
againft the defendant, for having offered his vote
to a Gentleman for iol. When this cafe was
brought before Mr. Jolliet Laminae' and a Jury,
at the lan affises for the county of Hereford, the
jury put their heads together, and thought it was
a joke ; they, therefore, found a verdia for the
defendant. _ _ _ _ _

Mr. Kinnaird was the Brit wi:nefs called, and
be being afked, whether a writ had not been fued
out agatinft himfelf alto for bribery ? be anfwEled,
Yes; and whether, if a verdi& went againli the
prefent defendant, he would not ere that verdia
for his own indemnity, as being a difcoverer of
bribery in another? He laid, he did not know: he
probably &odd ufe that or any thing elfe in his
own favour. Mr. Jußice LAWRIMCI. therefore,
thought Mr. Kinnaird was intereßed, and could
not be a vritnefs. But it aftewards appeared. that
another Gentleman, of the name of Bradley, had
orerioolly communicated to the plaintiff the cit+
cimilances of the bribery, which was fuppofed to
hive been committed by the defendant; and con.
-quently Mr. Kinnaird could not dircover that
w.sich bad bees difaavered before ; and, therefore.

"•-,' ^r I evavoloP.l, and hated, that the de-
fendant came up to him and Mr. Di aLy, when
they were standing in the streets of I_,;:orninit...r,
and otr,.t iiiin In.; vote for rs.:. Mc.
•VE. !Il'• ' ' 'lc • ettidant, made a trii.o
fpeech, to fatisfy them this was merclT'a aid
was fuccelsful.
Mr. Li, on the part of the plaintiff, prefted
this motion fir'a with great abilities and
earnelliters. He ollfel %sc.!. that it was a cafe of
very great importance that Mr. Dia:Hey ought
to have been examined ;`that it was ',or compe-
tent to the Court to confider sell tt I,i, evidence
would be, or what rff,et it would have on ill':
minds of the Jut v. Ni• man was a ditenveter till
• after conviCtiiiii, alit!, therefore, could not be laid
to be intereiled. The Ju'y believed this to he a
joke on the evidenve ct \tr. liinaaird, though lie
(wore he believed the defendant w.o, in earrielt.—
Now, if Mr. Bradley had been cx.tr,ined, Le might
have convinced the Jilt v t!•.: d.tc•id on was
He was perfealy fatistied %violet; scold
have made a great the minds of the
Jury. Ilad it not been tor jeOion a.f evi-
dence, lie had the vcateil coniid nee the plaintiff
would have had a : a:md that was certainly
the juilice of 11,e cae, As thei c was no: the finalell
realon to imagine was a joke. The Learned
Judge alfn Stated to the jut y, he law no realon to
think it a joke.
Their Lin dthips older ved, that this was a very
penal anion ; and that they never granted a new
trial to a qui la?: plaintiff on tile merit,. If Mr.
Ili:Kiley had been called, he was to have
proV,:d that which was •(.-..ed by Mr. Kinnaird,
and, therebue. lie would have castied the fans no I
farther. A motion fin new trial was an appli.
cation to the ditct etien of the Court; and it was
only on account of the rejeftion of evidence that
was maretial, that. the Court would grant a new
trial. Here the evidence appeated to be immate-
rial, inalmuch as it n-as only to confirm Mr. Kin.)
naird, whole evidence was not cc-mum:tidied.
The Learned Counfel took nothingbyhis motion.
Ts! KING V. VARLET.
Mr. Serjeant Baste, on the part of the &fen-
dart', moved for rule to fhew cattle why there
fhnuld not be a new trial in this cafe. This was
an indictment for alfaulting the profecutor, on ac•
fount of money won at play; and the confequences
were very (*minus, for the defendant was liable to
foreit all his goods and be imprifoned two years.
Lord Er.LsNsosouGH here asked, if the defen-
dant was in Court? He Paid the defendant midi
be in Court.
Mr. Darley made his appearance.
Mr. Serjeant Best- laid, the defendant did not
make any defence at the trial. His Attorney, to
whom he had entrufted the hufinefs, had negletied
to go down to the affixes with an affidavit to put
off the trial, on account of the abfence of a Mr.
Duncan, a material witnefs, who was now believed
to be in Scotland. An impede& affidavit was
produced at the trial, Rating, that this witnefs was
in Scotland; but it did not go onto Rate that Mr.
Darley believed that information to be true. The
defendant laid, he had reafoa to believe this pro-
fecution was inllituted againfl him for the purpofe
of extorting money, as the profecutor had offered
to make it up for 1501. He farther Rated, that
he had a good defence. He had the opinion of
the moil ref-pet:table Counfel that this was not a
cafe within the Ratute of Ann, upon which the
indiament was founded.
Lord ELLENBOROUGH aced, if the affidavit
Rated what fails the witnefs Duncan was to prove?
Mr. Serjeant BELT laid, it did not ; but that, ,
perhaps, the Court would allow them to amend
the affidavit.
Lord Eetkasototrou raid, it was extremely
dangerous (he did not (peak particularly as to this
cafe) to permit a party to stretch his confcience
jolt up to the point that might be material. The
affidavit ought to have fully difclofed to the Court
the nature of the evidence this witnefs was to give,
that thcCourt might have judged of its importance.
He mull inform the Court how it was material.
Mr. GARROW, leading Counfel for the profeeu-
lion, laid, the Learned Jullicc (Mr. Julliee Heath)
was of opinion, at the trial, there was not the
I...ltalica. foundation for the application. Every
indulgence was (sewn the defendant. The cattle
was not tried on the day on which it ought to have
been tried. It was not called on till the next day.
Mr. Jullice LAWRENCE obferved, that it was an
extremely dangerous thing to lay by to fee what
was proved againll him, and then to come with
this application to the Court.
Mr. Serjeant BEST laid, the circumflances of the
cafe were shortly there :—The defendant had cer-
tainly 101 l Sol. to the profecutor. That was not
paid at the time of toting that money ; that the
*fault did not take place at that time, but after-
wards, at the defendant's own lodgings, the pro-
fecutor thinking proper to intrude himlelf into
thefe lodgings to demand that money. He was
defired to walk out of the room; he refuted. The
defendant took him by the fhoulders, to turn hint
our. The profecutor refilled, and then the affault
took place. He (aid, his client was ready to fob.
alit to ant terms.
Lord Et.er anneovair laid, as the ennfequences
of this conviai,,n might be extremely let ious to the
Defend:tot, the Court s.iotild permit bins to make
...ts affidavit slur int', the sitting of the Court, Rating
the materialit y of the evidence Dio-ranwas to give.
and the Coatt would hear Mr. SLlitallt BEST u;s
it nu Monday. In the mean time, the Detirschint
tr. Al hand committed.
For the sir,ke t f that part of ;ha puhlie who may
he concerned in gam:ll7, we !hall (Lao; the words
of the Act on which this ind•drneat is foan&d.—
r,th Ann, c 4;7. 14. liC. 8. " for the prevent-
ing ()flitch quarrels a, (hall a:ld may happen upon
the account of gaming, be it further enafted, by
the authority aforefaid, That in cafe arty introit or
for s liariOever fladl affault and beat, or (tall
, • .
challenge or provoke to fight, any other perf,n or
perfnits wliatfi•ver, toior. account of any money
won by garniog, g. or betting at any of the
flames atop.iald, loch or perfon, alfaulting
and heatirg, or L11.41!L ,t tai; or provoking to fi7,ht
Inch other pornopelf, tivon the account
atfus.;:ii4l, Leini tlicrccf cctiviacet uptits

' indielment or information to be exhibited again(
biro or them for that purpofe, forfeit to her Ma.
jelly, her heirs and Otceelrors, all hi, goods, chattelt,
and net:l:mat cchay;ever, and (hall trifofu,fer im
tail or mainprite, in the common
the county where furh couviaionJhall lie had,dar-
ling the term of inv., years."