Star.
London, England, 1818-03-10 00:00:00

leman had said, that in-
so much to protect Mi-
who gave information.—
cious representation; but
maintain that Ministers
for such an indemnity.
Were they gentlemen
lity justified in some mea-
e House was called upon
:ion? No, they were the
re sent forth by Ministers,
Us that had disturbed the
ter: was one fact now
of those spies, in addition
detected, which called for
fact was stated, and in-
respectable Newspapers of
bton) had other authority.
nary, to produce the name
Lid prove all the circum-
chem.)—This gentleman
opening the &ssion last
egent returned from the
liver at the Horse Guards
invoigiting in such loud
egent as to collect a crowd
al whose name he could
ly to confirm his statement
i Oliver in vain. The con-
MI the person of the Prince,
e Habeas Corpus—(muck
)pposed any indemnity for
unjustifiable. Not only
aion against the Bill ; net
m, conscientious, and dc-

•
inisters and their agents
; but, in the name of the
rated (Durham), where the
lost the right of election ;
• a full, fair, and impartial
,ctised during the suspen-
-(loid akeenng.)--He did
,encing the House, but he
ace, that the House was
le of England to support.,
this Bill be read a first
.(canlinaed cheering.)
not have risen so early, if ,
ter side had attempted to
off ei ful speech of his Ho-
hear from the Ministerial
s he supposed from that
now disposed to make the
ready to give way to him
Opposition).---[The Hon.
Speaker put the question ;
himself, the Honourable
use. resumed.) --.He had
,portunity to contradict his
meat, if any had felt dis-
s attempt--(hear, hear).--
hen proceeded to spew the
cedents of the Indemnity
, 1745, and 1780, and the
ch the present Bill was
ie most objectionable part
ad a retrospective effect u
auary, 1817, although the
:ommence in its operation
-(hcar, hear). He thought
tmed safficicat to have the
,e with the Suspension Act.
ry singular, that out of the
nety-four, there were fifty-
•arrants from the Secretary
'arrant* of the Privy C,oun-
- the Magistrates of Derby
of those apprehended by
retary of State was ever
re liberated on giving their
hear). lie did not see in
ng to warrant the beast of
:ss of character. For his
circumstance; of the times
~suspension of the Habeas
nihilation. It was an Act,
was felt only in times of
'et that was the very time
:ffectual—(hear, hear). He

Dught with the Honourable
that Annual Parliaments,
would ultimately end in
sure, that among the ad-
my might be found, who
v of improving the Repre-
As to the Bill before the
s Parliament had confided
re Powers, it was bound to
ise of those powers, pnrti-
pear to him that they were-

•e were some parts of the
thjections, but he would re-
per stage to urge those ob-
r.)—He should vote for the

supported the Bill. He
rosters fairly exercised the
in. They were responsible
ble only to this House. The
t as their opinion, that the
Suspension Act were judi-
discharged. What was the
to do? It must either be-
;tness of this opinion. But
ded upon documents which
to be open to public inspec-
resumed to be justifiable by
s unquestionable that much
m the information given by
those who opposed the Bill,
to abandon their witnesses,
the people. Much was said
it the spy who caused the
s Corpus, but Mr. Cobbet,
ters of this description.
ridge) observed, that as the
o hare acted according to
no doubt, there could be
,f Indemnity. It appeared,
detained, either on charges
of treason, and' out of the
of think there was any one
prosecution on the grounds
even if there were two or
a appeal. to the law:. for re-