Star.
London, England, 1811-04-19 00:00:00

. .
.

,

. •

I

greeina•P•mioN.,=------
MIMITES OF EVIDENCE,
GIVEN BEFORE Ter. COMMITTEE OF PRIVILEGES,
7.owlinin the Petition at WILLIAM FITZ tjARDIWOL DIAKILLZT
claiming as of right to be Earl of Beagle?, meal referred.
------- , I
• FRIDAY, SI "ell 01.
The Right Hon. MARY Countess of Butanes was
called, and a chair being pieced for her, her Ladyship
came to the table, and having been sworn by tho
LOttEi CHANCEL-Lott, was examined as follows :
When was your Ladyship first married to the late
Earl of Berkeley ?—On the 30th of March, 1785.
- Where was that marriage solemnized ?--In the pa-
eish church of Berkeley.
Who was the Clergyman that solemnized that
marriage ?—Tha Rt 9. Mr. Hupsman. .
Who were present at the time of the solemnization
of that marriage ?---aMy brother, Mr. Tudor, and the
clerk, and the late Earl of Berkeley.
WAS it the regular clerk of the parish who attended
on that occasion ?...-No, I believe not.
Does your Ladyship know who brought that per-
son there who officiated es clerk ?—I understood Mr. ,
Hupsman brohght him there.
Does your Ladyship know who that person was ?
No, I do not.
Was the marriage duly registered at the time ?
Yes, I think it was ; I am sure it was.
. ' Did your Ladyship sign your name to that regis•
try ?—Yes, I did.
• The witness then turned to an entry in the parish '
• register of Berkeley, which was read as follows .:
No. 74.-Frederick Augustus Earl of Berkeley, of this pa-
-Wish, bachelor, and Mary Cole, of the same, spinster, were mar-
Pied in this church, by bans, this 13th day of March, in the year
:1785, by me, " AUGUSTUS TINO.MAS HUSSMAN, vicar.
" This marriage was solentnized between us'
• • " In the presence of W.Tuooa. BESIELLET.
" TileGlArk )4 Of RICHAUD BARNS. MART Core.
. . The entry was shown to the Countess of BERKELEY,
and her Ladyship was farther examined as follows :
Will your Ladyship state to the Committee whe-
ther the name ". Mary Cole," affixed to that entry, is
your Ladyship's hand-writing, and was written at
that time ?—Yes ; and it was written at the time.
Will your Layship state whether the name " Ber-
keley"•is the hand-Writing of Lord Berkeley, and
was written at the time ?—Yes, it is the hand-writing
of Lard Berkeley, and was written at the time.
- ' Was the name Augustus Thomas Hupsman writ-
ten at the time ?—Yes, it is the hand-writing of Mr.
Hupsman ; and that name was written at the time.
Was the name of William Tudor, which your
Ladyship will find there as a witness, written at the
time, and by Mr. Tudor ?—.Yes, it was.
! v Was that marriage immediately avowed, or was it
kept a secret ?—lt was kept secret.
When was it first proposed to the Earl of Berkeley
that that marriage which your Ladyship has stated to
, the House was kept secret should be avowed i--r
cannot exactly tell.
Does your Ladyship.recollect, when it was pro-
posed to Lord Berkeley that that marriage should be
avowed, the reasons that Lord Berkeley gave for the
farther concealment of that marriage ?—Yes, I do re-
collect them.
Have the goodness to state them ?—Lord Berkeley
gave me as a reason, that the registry had been des-
troyed, and that it could not be avowed without great
risk to the clergyman who was supposed to have des-
troyed the registry.
In consequence of that communication from Lord
Berkeley; was it determined that the marriage should
still be kept secret ?—Yes, it was. ,
Does your Ladyship recollect consulting with any
and what professional man, and whom, respecting
what was to be done under the idea of the,registry have]
ing been destroyed?--Yes, I consulted Mr. Bearcroft.
'When did your Ladyship consult Mr. Bearcroft ?
. Ido not exactly recollect the date ; it was before the
second marriage took place.
Will your Ladyship be good enough to state to the
House what advice Mr. Bearcroft gave upon that sub-
feet ;•--He recommended a second marriage, under
• the circumstances of the case. -
WAS that advice • in writing ?—No, I think it was
pot in writing.
Did your Ladyship immediately eclniesce in the
advice of Mr. Bearcroft, that there should be a second
.marriage ?—No, I did not. -
Whatavere your Ladyship's reasons for not immetr--
ately acquiescing in that advice?—l thought it would
he forsaking my eldest son, and giving up all possibi-
lity, in my own mind, of proving the first marriage.
In consequence of this. had your Ladyship a se-
cond interview with Mr. Bearcroft ?—Yes, I had.
Did he get over those difficulties which existed in
your Ladyship's mind, and how ?—He did not quite
get over the difficulties.
But did your Ladyship submit to his opinion ? Pie
went to Brighton, and I determined to remain un-
married till he returned. Mr. Be
know whlo I was. Bearcroft did not thcn
In consequence of the advice you had received from
ri Mr. Bearcroft, did your Ladyship ultimately consent
l'
to a second marriage ?-I did. .
Wilhere was your Ladyship married tOtorcrßeike:
ley a second time ?—ln the parish of Lambeth. - :
On the second marriage taking place, was the mar-
riage avowed, or was it still concealed ;—The mar-
riage was still concealed.
Did your Ladyship take the title of Countess of
Berkeley, or did your Ladyship pass by the same
name you had formerly passed by ?—I passed by the
- same name I had done before, and refused to be ac-
' knowledged then.-
liy what name did your Ladyship pas?--Miss
Tudor.
• Down to wh;tt period of tirtre did your Ladyship
• continue by the name of Miss Tudor ?—I cannot ex-
actly tell to a few months, but I think about the tit.
ter end of 17,97, or the beginning of 1798.
Is the Committee to understand that your Lady.
. ship then assumed the title of Countess of Berkeley .?*
Yec, I did. .
I Was the petitioner then called by the title of Lord
Dorsky ?—I cannot answer to a few mouths, hut.:
. sirup soon after.
From the period when the petitioner was called by
the-title of Lord Dursley dewy to sh
edrsent time,
has been called by the tithrof LoDurslcy
, .
:Until his father's death. -
'.' -Has he been in every respect treated, from that time
' as the eldest legitimate soh of the late Earl Berkeley
i., Yes, he -,..11.6 treated solrom the hour of 1s birth, ex-
cep; in aaktng the tide.
, Dues your. Ladyship recollsit thi Millieli -upon
. .. . . . . .
L...._...../.- • ---- ' . '
'' ' •
__ _ -

you took down from the dictation Lord .„
you delivered over to Mr. Hughes ?—I did.
By Lord Berkeley's orders ?—Yes.
Did your Ladyship, in consequence, give any
directions, and what, to Mr. Hughes ?—Lord Berke-
ley desired me to take them to Mr. Hughes, to have
them written out, and to be returned to him (Lord
'Berkeley) for his Lordship's signature.
Is the present claimant the first son of the marriage
of which your Ladyship has spoken i—He is.
The Attorney-General stated to the Committee,
that as it would be necessary to request the attend.
ance of the Countess of Berkeley on another occasion,
be should not now trouble her Ladyship with any
questions.—Her Ladyship withdrew.
Then EDWARD JENNER, M.D. was called in, and ex-
amined as follows :
You were the Physician who attended Lord Berke-
ley in his last illness ?—I was one of the Physicians
Do you recollect what was the state of Lord Berke-
ley's
_health on the Ist of August ?—His general
sunk at

. _
health then was extremely bad ; very much
that time.
Was there at that time any probability of Lord
Berkeley recovering from the illness he then labom-ed
under ?—At that time I had relinquished all hopes of
Lord Berkeley's recovery,
What was the state of Lord Berkeley's mental fa-
culties at that time ?—According to my conception,
they were perfectly clear and distinct.
-Was Ldrd Berkeley aware, to your knowledge, of
the state of danger that he was then in ?—Perfectly
aware, not only at that period, but previously to it.
His Lordship began to despond long before his medi-
cal attendants began to despond.
Did you know Mr. Hupsman?—lntimately.
Have you sten him write ?—Many. times.
Then the entry in the Registry of the Parish of
Berkeley, of the marriage of the late Lord Berkeley,
was shewn to the witness, and he was asked,
Do you believe that signature, " Augustus Tho-
mas Hupsman," to be the hand-writing of Ilia Hups-
man ?—Yes, I do.
Then an entry in the Registry of Banff was shewn
to Dr. Jenner, and he was examined as follows :
'Phis book contains a registry of the publication of
bans ; do you see in this book any thing that is of the
hand-writing of Mr. Hupsman ?—Certainly I do ;
'this (pointing to the entry shewn him) appears to me
Ito be the baud writing of Mr. Hupsman ; I believe it
to be his writing.
Do you believe the signature only, or the whole of
the entry to be his writing i-.—l am more impressed
with the signature ; that makes more impression than
another part of a man's writing.
But what do you believe as to the rest ?—lt bears
a, strong resemblance as I can recollect at this period;
he has been de.td many years, and it is a long time
since I saw his writing. It bears a stiong resem-
blance, andahe signature itself is the same as if it had
been engraved to be a tac-simile.
With respect to the rest of the entry, do you be.,
bevel from your general knowledge of Mr. Hops.'
man's hand-writing, that it is of his hand-writing ?
I am not so confident of the one as I am of the otherr
the one I could swear to," Augustus Thomas Hops.
man, Curate," is the same as he always wrote. 1 re-
collect a peculiar turn of the letter A, which fixes it
strongly in my mind.
Then the entry was read, and is as follows :
" Bans of marriage between Frederick Augustus, Earl of Berke-
ley, of this parish, bachelor, and Mary Cole, spinster, were
published on the following days, namely, en
Sunday the 2,,t1e of November.
Sunday the kit of December,
Suaday the 1.2t11 of December, 1784.
" AUGUaTUS fiSOMAS Hu MIS• 14, Curate."
Was Lord Berkeley, as late as the sth, perfectly
master of himself, and in possession -of all his facul-
ties ?—To the 4th I can venture to say positively.
(Question by a Loan.) Is Mr. Hupstnan's widow
living or dead ?—His widow, I believe is now living.
! Did he leave a daughter behindl—He left a daugh-
ter, who is living at Berkeley ; she married a gentle-
man of the name of Hicks. .
Do you recollect a man of the flan*: of John Clark
being Parish Clerk of Berkeley about the year 1784
—Yes.
Do you know where he is living ?—the last time
I heard of him was about twelve tnontlis ago; he was
then living in London. .
You
.do not know whether he is living now ?—No,
I do not. . .
Of whose hand-writing do you conceive the entry
itself of the marriage to be, independently of the sig.
nature'of Mr. Hupsman ?....—I cannot form an opinion
of that.
. .

- . ..• . . • ' . ... • ,
. . . ,
. " • . , •
. . t
rt. I lOMAS. L. Olt, r.loAf'Sg'2lL, 'New. Newish min -street
•.. - .
lowhich he was first called Leltd Dallier! ?-I't was in I Do you think it i's the hand-writing/of Mr. Hops-
-I-
"V*11"41:44'
vg4l.lloVxr;44...ithsettar Life:sir:l :rbil:L7w77lll hisvilal.
lace:
"11.-":
consequence of an opinion given by Lord Chief Jus- ' man to-I do not think it is so much like the hand- ,
tice Mansfield. . writing of' Mr. Hupsman as some I have seen:
f .111.1112rdtf,")3Utitialth11.1 ihtl if; l:f2
Your Ladyship was living with Lord Berkeleyat Lock at the Ain Frederick Augustus Earl of
- Berkeley ; is the A of his hand writing ?—I do not the urnill vriod of the year when AIL Illirltles4t cee'nEtavarayst 841;9'
the period of his last illness and death ?—Yes.
gioi:7,:sar'itl;',ifighe.taltii:ntoageriktav•af, rt;ipliissofriiiikrl:egtobiwort..iiss:mCetavinacealkiarrevieviliiviirisuilukiert'ated
!
Can your Ladyship form any opinion as to the cause : think that was the common way in which he made
of that illness'—The Attorney-General objected to : his A in dre-genes al manner. :
s A rier :....:•.Tli,.” tut; lICLR 0 l'l,. V1.1.:b ht i,,„
the question. iDo riu believe it to be his hand-writing ?.—I can .s„,i.„,„:tv. i„ ,
It was determined that the question propounded only say that it is Very much like it.
" the whwte erizry ?—lt is very much like Mr. Hops- 11VIta::Jiti:::::::;:frat, :ugirreirasil7:::ptitazt're.llC:rtliv.;:iyet:itcr..t:infeec):7l"::aeant Iti:0';
htegiirii::lileinvisr:::::led..4liii:iyiirdiri;l4.ll;scw...
5%1' ,
ought not to be put. .
Whether, whilst Lord Berkeley VAS lying ill at man's hand-writing.
l'ireacct' rionpiihe.Z,itiskoeir*c;ios',f Nill4l44rjaUtedianWere C6C
PSkirare tru:nitera'tr.:64-4-14
Berkeley Castle, his Lordship did not dictate to your Tint A. in Augustus Earl of Berkely, as well as
Ladyship certain letteis ?—Yes, he did. the rest ?—Yes ; there is- a generil character. whisk
How long before Lord Berkeley's death was it that fixes it on my jnind. I might just make -a remark nary, and ibe'euniffisUs cults weak stideddesi superiority. •
Palei:,t Anti.corßlsurftlitic DrsocrZstrftioditlicelliealenestdnuamlity prifltStP"..l int72:l9t
he dictated those letters ?—lt appears from the papers respecting Mr. Hiipsrnan's hand-writing, that it vi. A 6 tr.reart.
to be seven or eight days, but not to my recollection, ried at certain periods in consequence of his having
hick, in buttles Of Ss. 6d. double bottles Aka. and Warr •Erta. airy
for I thought it had been only three or fobr days. lost an eye. - ' included. Compound Erser.oe,Ss.
Was Lord Berkeley then in such a state that it ap... Whether the person of the name of John Clark did .- Dispenray, i 5. Soho-aquare, Louden% .
. . - _ .. . . _ . •
peared to your Lordship he was satisfied he was about not act as clerk by deputy for a considerable period . DR, aarHeRGIVS NERVOUS COItDIAL orieh.
to-die ?—Yes, he was. of time ?—Certainly, for some years. • rir'HE latent cause of Nervous Disorders lies in at
What did your Ladyship do with the papers you Ni.'hether you know that a person of the name Of i impure stateof 01.1,edriatneit;i7rise,tjairlitoeleuisf;,,weirritiiitiiiosii,alekTi;41:1/2aniutf.....ooil
took down from Lord Berkeley's dictation ?—I gave Pruett was the deputy of Clark at that time ?—A tEerviisunuost,sfi.Ubprilesor;tinthg‘ist.hrpirte
them to Mr. Hughes, tutor to my children, by Lord man of the narne of Pruett officiad for some years
Berkeley's desire. for John Clark, hs the lay-clerk of th! parish of Berke- H t. - 2.1 mat
P' • r citbeilg sti."l"ed'ilPuchnne•24?' tnd
were aftecttonsanse,ausl from this dist:au-4i its 4.f tbl i..a.i.
Then a letter was shewn to the Countess of Beike- ley ; he has been dead some years. theva
riouschit
, it= evury 1 ,
ley and she was asked, Do you think he has been dead eleven years ?—No, ei:j...) met*, ito thread of elistericeby a Fenn 11,.,. ~. .....
Is that one of the letters ?—Yes, it is. I.think not eleven ; but I am not quite certain.
hafForanedrretrthelhiense..semin:fito:ingnselhei.ireiihisetkie I:
rbbehs.utaFesru4...brni:RetnlitlysiG:,lbiltui4eti:Nili:rnyit:cn:ll:::ll,:aplithar:iorc.aja...3.trrielti,ujimin,,:tki:aki.,e:,,,hii.:ll,e-y931:,.;::.i.a5e:
Is that signed by the Earl of Berkeley ?—Yes. Cross-examined by Mr. ATrolltiev-GEN LH AL.
Does your Ladyship recollect, that besides the one Where did Pruett die ?—At Berkeley.
just shewn to your Ladyship, which was addressed to Had he lived there for some time before his death ? close attention to bus.nes.,,aol a sekmaryTife. i:ipowcts'lsave
. bar
etiltlf..u,rll
ittt.on.-erritnaEwimuir:.
Lord Craven, there was another addressed to his —I believe he never lived out of the place.
ysi7,l4aarrt too 4:
Royal Highness the Prince of Wiles ?—There was. What was he ?—By trade a mason. tgleteneur•atiakr:Ten‘exisic.oeomruaecutedtiezi;soit.
wNel:ilLten.ap..l;iteticinciopzLe.„.7.l4T.hi
Was there any other letter addressed to any other (8.1/4 Lord).—Do you know any thing of a man
:ivrid:liveo'iit,ollthsa;,i4ccadnkiadteenaxme,7teinals
el"cdoZlii-mtearFlibickayiesth:tra::o,7lo,•4ltoati.
person besides the one shewn to your Ladyship, of the -named Barns, whose mark is signed in the registry ?
tva,ciatql:u;a7u:
sth, addressed to his Royal Highness the Prince of —Nothing whatever.
Wales ?—There was one to Admiral Berkeley. The Counsel for the Petitioner stated, that the wit-
hany'llichaitiinualc.eaesd. twillaitEt.srrdrottPe:enigia.atinsdniarng,alperidd'reccv sere.iiitel'esit
Does your Ladyship know whether that letter ad- ness desired to add something by way of explanation
dressed to Admiral Berkeley was forwarded to Ad- to his evidence relative to the registries ; and perfnis- art promoted by it, and the *whole constithi oil receives new lie
anlidi•ne.;:".rd''lllibtil t..9.l:biulgrclaili ,eagerness tiovesher ficl.rMiatilel"lat,scrrn ttbe..ti.-17e
miral Berkeley otitis station abroad?—Yes, it was. sion being given to him accordingly, he said—The
Your Ladyship is understood to say, that the letters hand-writing respecting which I wit examined, in one
ard 1.1;,h!y nervouli state whack is Mown co succeed ckildhed, coot
'- di 'of - ,rd 73erkeley of the books, I believe to be the hand-writing of the j those peculiar,-'' •of the sm. wl•ith by arum of r...t: ; -

; -

Late Earl of Berkeley, it is so like it.
Then the registty of the marriagevas arain sheyn
to the winless, and he said, This hears a strong re-
semblance in its character to the hand-writing of the
late Lord Berkeley.
(By a Lord). Did you ever see his Lordship write ?
—Many times. Do you believe it to be his Lord-
ship's hand-wr:ting ?—Most firmly I do.
The whole of the entry ?—The signature does not
appear to be his ; the signature Augustus Thomas
Hupsman," appears to be Mr. Hupsman's hand-wri,
ting : the whole of the entry, except the signature
of Hupsman, I conceive it to be Lord Berkeley's
hand-writing.
040:Ilona! ATTORNEY-GENICRAL.
At what time did Pruett act as. the deputy-clerk ?
—4 cannot exactly recollect, but I have often seen
him in that situation, and know that he. was in that
ituation for some years. • •
(Ey a Lord).—You have stated that the whole of
of

_. iodispositions -,
tion, are apt to prostoce the most fatal andliiiretrfatii iiiielits, and
even death itself.
h.' 414 .wholesale and retail at Mr. Petite*, No 4 4. a-,,,,, ie,
corner of Paternoster-row, Lori:loll- • and by 'most Cott tt y Me-
dicine Vcadotsdn every tens*, toils:nits it 4i ed. anti ties. th.

. • ADM'S, . •
NCOU It A G,ED by the uniform success. altenctng
A=J theif peculiar meatiod of tfernic-t in the cere' of a w
prevalept complainti;Which hails:ten fxmhrmed by thereperte nee
of ninny years in Oarge.and eztemive practice ; ceoss.ble al„. of
the happy effects resulting •to the public front medical n
confining their attention to a entail 'Haw of dkotaiwil Isit4es.
GOES and Co. continue to direccAleeir studies to kisow ete,ow'e,s
arising trom a secret deotructiye habit of incousiderre. you y,
which not only occasions 1 numerous train, el•rsetteaseiaffertqee,
but alas entails on its votaries all the eriervalinglatibefaliike of
old age. In that distressing state of driselity or deficiency, Wit:.
(her the consequence of st.,:h baneful irabl.‘, exee4blye antkiiin
long residence in hot climates, or any other cause, by which the
i powers of the constitution become enfeebled, as regietirly
ted surgeons of London, they offei t Anivti)e, andlyeedy area
ration to sound and vigorous health.
Where au early application is matte for the cure of a c-rtia
disorder, frequently contracted in a moment of inetrirry, the era-
dication is generally com.pleteidies this abort ;spate of ow, 11,7%
and in the more advanced and inveterate stages of Ventral
infection, characterized by a variety of painful and tfisteeesing
syMptomi, a perseverance in their plan (without restraint it sins
or exercise) will ensure to the natimt. a permanent and radital
cure. The diseases of the Urethra, as frequently contreced
with or arising irons the above coruphiint, have not estapol
their attention; by an infallible and Improved plan, they ate et-
abled to remove obstinate CLEATS and S tRICTURES. wh.the
recent or of long duration, without resorting to the painful and
dangerous use of the caustic boogies Many instances can be ad-
duced of very inveterate easel, of seve—al years continuance,;rr-
Ing
yielded to their method in a fetydays, alter the cure had beta
attempted by other practitioners without effect ; and such has berg
the agreeable result of a practice of fourteen years, taut the mode
of treatment has not in one single instance, ever • roqd alx-treve,
during which period many thousand persons, of ituiti evx.ts, have
experienced the enjoyment of having been perfectly cured, alter
were and injurious methods had beets persevered in to to
Messrs. Goss and Co. exclusively professing the cure et Awls
particular complains, In order that they my not be, by a mis-
taken few, marked with the obloquy so justly attached to the ig-
norant empiric, think it but justice to themselves to state that they
Jaye been properly educated and Initiated into every branch of the
,profession (certificates of which, frost different hospitals, anti
testimonials from the most eminent Physicians, they have is car-
wince nu) inquirer), that the success resulting from their evict.
;yours last induced theneto cult the practice of the genr-al prat
titioner, and they presume tbat their pretentious constitute a 1.4
ground for the unoryeedented confidence with which they hart,
by the ?üblic, been so liberally honoured.
GOSS and Co. Surgeons, 13, ilioneerie-=truce, Filet-street.

thAt entry, except the signature Hupsman, you
believe to be the hand-writing of the Earl of Berkeley?
—I do not mean to include the signature of Richard
Barns. I believe the whole of the remainder to be
Lord Berkeley's handwriting, except the signatures.
The whole above Hupsman's signature ?—Yes, I
believe it is.
Dolan believe the word " Vicar," which follows ,
the signature of Hupsman, to be Mr. Hupsman's
hand•wnting, or Lord Berkeley's ?—Not my Lurd
Berkeley's, but Hupsman's.
The witness was directed to withdraw.
Dr. Parry, of Bath, deposed to the soundness of
Lord Berkeley's mind at all the periods previously to
his last visit (August 7). •

Of the various complaints incident to the human I
frame, there are none more dreadful in their nature,
nor more alarming in their consequences, than the-
Gravel and Stone, Pains in the 'kick, Loins, and
Bladder, and Lumbago. They are complaints to
which every person is liable, and are a foundation-for
every other species of disorder. HICKS! SN'S Plus,
coMposed of thc most hulocent ingredients, ha ve been
found of singular efficacy, in not only strengthening
the vessels containing the urine, but happily destroy-
ing the petrifying quality of it, from which proceed
the above complaints, &c. removing the calculi, or
gritty secretions, And banishing every pernicious ten-
dency to those disorders, without confinement.—
From a consciousness of the powerful quality of these
Pills, fully evinced by a private practice of many
years, they are offered to the Afflicted, and recom-
mended as a Cure for the above Complaints.—Sold
wholesale and retail at Mr. Butler's, 4, Cbeapside,
corner of Paternoster-row ; and retail by Belam and
Sharp, Portsmouth ; Hall and Johnson, Gosport ;
Annan, Weston, Mallory and Jones, Portsea ; Trew.
man, Exeter ; Cookworthy, Glenville, Gilbert and
`Hos-land, Plymouth ; Newbury, Dublin ; Baxter and
Macdonald, Glasgow ; Smith, Manderston, Scott,
and Cargill, Edinburgh ; Crutwell, Bath ; Ross and
Peck, Hull; Gregson and Billinge, Liverpool ; Stains
and Lynda, Manchester; Bowen, Norwich ; Knott
-and Lloyd, Birmingham; Gregory, Brightan ; and
most Medicine Venders, in boxes at c.s. 9d. each.

CHALL2IIcE.
MESSIZS. CUR RiE and Co. Surgeons, late in '.as
Majesty's Service, challenge the whole world to prove a
single Instance where their Mediciee and method of cure ha us
failed of the 41.:Sired effect. :rise practice of many years in
particular branch of their profession Las not given nse to ore
unsuccessful cam.
'They continue to direct their studies to the treatmeyit and cure
of Venereal Complaiuts, and that derangement ot the w•ressi,
which is :he consequence oldie peruki-ms aol we...tend effecr • et a
habit long and most uobs..pily pureued blase:youths of both sei.en
In tile one it will be found to he tire uuluiling source of !wise-
nes, ; the other have its ravages fatally developed to them by a :::s.
meseing *ate of debility, which, if not timely remedied, terniie:ss
in impotence. These are its remote and ultimate eifec ts, tele •:.•
sumptions, loss of Muscular power, and Various aervuus etenlea s
Usually cli,.racterise the earlier stages of thissblimey rice. e-r-
-sons under the dieordees tucidont to such a hales, s. ;ler
treatment is simple and has never provet! unattce snrl, ;n we
Collnl. or a long, laborioes; and MltCli time:led practice. in the
roost obstinate and complicated cases ot venereal iiitection, nick
as °burin...ions in the utetbn, ungy excrescences, hz,
mours,callirdi alters, mutinous, !cranial weakness, Ars
SIIIICTIIRES,
W!rether recent or of long nt.rt4on, and winch have the
skill Mother Practit*lners ; art by their present improved Flan el
eel:silent, effectually and permauently oured, without the ramie
suffering the excruciating pails and alarming hemorrhage
often tames the applieitioes of the lunar caustic. In the course of
RECENT CURES, It'll. 20 years extensive prectice In this uurnerous case, at
To Dr. SoLOMO re, Gilead-House, near Liverpool. Sfriczirres have been and art daily under their are, the re:-.1
SIR—An instance of the singular efficacy of your I eradication or which are effected by a safe, certain, and cc:rt.
Cordial Balm of Gilead, has fallen under my notice, which timis mode of practice, superior to any other yet adse,r4.
merits general publicity. A man, In this neighbourhood, about N weakneve, relacetion, and debility proceeding Irons thi4
the age of thirty, bad the appearance of labouring under that lls speedily removed, end the patient re:cored to soend t
most dangerous disease, the Phthisis Pulmonalis, or Consumption. gorous health. Iliac where the debility has, for year!
1-1 e had a consider hie degree of hectic fever, profuse night sweats, proper perseverance in the rr restorative remedies, afar the tr,•
expectorated much, and was rediced to a state of extreme dehi- ; cure has been destroyed, is indispensably retiaieite to retire ..;:e
lity. Having had the best medieul advice be could procure, with- • slurnhernig spark- of life, and to reanimate the Cone: tut r•
out obtaining relief, he bad recourse to your Cordial Balm of , Several Noblenwu and Gentlemeu, ot the firs:
Gilead. For some time he perceived little alteration ; but peter- ban been ander the tare of Messrs. Currie and Co. for •
vering in the use of this mediene, all the unfavourable symptoms moval of complaints ot the Urethra, Strictures, &c. end•
gradually abated, and he has attained a vigorous state of health. t received a r,adieal "and .pernasnent cure, reqhest that reter .7
Yours respectfully. . 13. Bowe Haar D. 4 may be madn'to sheaf as satisfactory evidences ot the deceits!
Pourefeact,' April 2, let I- j pesiority of Mears. Currie and Coi's plea of treatm.m. ;my
To Da. Sohomosi. Gileadeliorse, near Liverpool. - of these Gentlemen have had Strictures bum ten to rn'i•i•lT
Silt —About twoyears ego I laboured udder a violent Nervous and had been under the care of Messrs. Home and lirarist,'ol,
Complaint, attended with great Weakneie and Loss of Memory ; arid other surgeosie of equal eggs/Wee ancluinled
was induced to try your Cordial Balm of Glieed, which I pur- by the alipbcatin; of the Ulm &issue, without success.
chased df your iticitts •M. and R. Eranthwalte, Booksellers; in • Messrs. Carrie anti Co. may becomnikedbyeither set WO' tint
f(endal, and vox usistt found the happy effects wil.ch it produced greatest delicacy, secrecy, and honour, at their house, No. to.,
by beingaestesred to my former strength and msmnry. I have a liamori-Cites.,
.Patlente in the epun::'y are requested to eve
wish to make this case public, but motives of delicacy prevent my theparriculani of Kier edse, age, and general habit ot
name being inserted. Any• person 'visiting to be informed of fur. ;minims a rannttanee for advice and nird,eines, whe.t the L
titer particulars, may have ample information, aud a proper ad. will be given nr sent to any part of the kiesd,,m,
dress, by applyiug to Messrs. Branthwalte. M. S. l'o ensure 'that secrecysn stett-titi% to their iindertalhr.
Hawkshead, April sth, 1511. - • PI4UV,OI. !te 'Med to the account for medic-11,.
sold at 105.13 d. per bottle, and faintly bottles containing four
at Sss. each,. laeMithiews. and Leigh, 1% Strand, Loudon, and LONDON : Printed and isebiblied by I.rvr.r. Be r, at the 1
' all Medicine Venders. • Orrlcs, No. 1, Carsyvitreet, awl at Os VII. . .
• .

8111.111.
On the 6th instant, the Lady of Gorman Munkhouse, of
Winton, Esq. daspitter.