Star.
London, England, 1820-10-04 00:00:00

THE QUEEN.

We were necessarily obliged to abridge the con-
cluding part of what Mr. BROUGHAM delivered yes-
terday in his very able defence of her MAJESTY. In
our preceding columns we have therefore given a
full report of that pai of his speech.
In our subsequent columns will be found an ample
report of the proceedings of this day; but before pro-
ceeding to the detail, we must devote a portion of
our columns to the elucidation of another subject, to
which the attention of the House of Peers was called
yesterday mai ning by the Earl of LtvettPdoi.—
namely, the threat alleged to have been denounced
by Colonel BROWN against the younger MARLETTE,
resident in London. Every person at all versant in
the affairs of the world, knows how easy and bow
common it ist when any impression is wished to be
removed, or a new complexion to be given to it, to
get letters of explanation framed to suit the object in
view: but it generally happens, where the object is
worthy of the investigation, that other letters being ne-
cessary, for the information of some of the parties, that
they may not be surprized at the post facto colouring
wished to be thrown over the object, these letters also
reach the light, and thus remove the veil that had
been attempted to be drawn over the transaction.—
Now this happens precisely to have been the case with
the subject before us. Let any one read the subjoined
correspondence, and they will feel no difficulty in
corning to a just conclusion respecting the explana-
tions offered by the now celebrated Col. BROWN,
through the First Lord of the Treasury, on the open-
ing of the House yesterday:

wa ie-

PROM M. MARIZITI TOT KLOTZ, TO EIS $01! AI

Milan, September 16.

Dearest Son—l have received and read your letter of the
3d instant. Relatively to the threats conveyed to me by Mr.
Brown, I must repeat to you axe more the same observations
I then made—that If is expedient to cut short with the great
(tagliar curt. via gransk). They are always in the right. You
have taken up the 'matter with much heat; in the main you are
right, I feel that you are so, but you have carried it too far.—
It is true that Brown has expressly and repeatedly insisted
with Mr.- Albertonio, that be should make known to you
the dissatisfaction in that quarter towards you, and the dan-
ger of the Alien Bill, which you were going to encounter.=
But, nevertheless, follow the judgment of your father, who
knows by experience what Is most expedient, and for the
best, in similar cases. Abandon the object, and allow the
controversy thus to terminate, since, by persons of mean con-
dition or inferior rank, u you and I are, it is sufleiently
well terminated by what has been already done. This instant
a courier has arrived with latter* of the sth, and by the
paragraph relative to Milan you may see how completely what
Brown saiellere has been verified. You treated and spoke with
the person alluded to, believing him quite a different character.
I will speak with Peter at his return, as I hive to-day spoken
with Sperati ; but whatever happens, what you said is right,
that you, Peter, and Spaeth are well known, for persons of
ewe and character, and very different from that good for-no-
thing individual (fuel peon di bum.) But the conclusion is, to
keep everything silent, and to prevent all publicity.

I salute you, your affectionate Father.
no. vs.—urns rosie me. xAstarri Sig was vo couunn.
BROWN. Milan, Sept. la.
Most worthy tikagl-1 understood, with great astern, that

your nerve has been compromised in a luting of conversation,
which wasuuppoeed to have taken place between you and mc r..,-
Isisive to my son Joseph, at present in London. I think it there.
Ware a duty to declare, as I now declare upon my honour, that
/'no conversation ever passed between yon and me, directly on
tide subject. If the expressions contained in a letter written by
Sae to my son are somewhat strong, they must be ascribed to th:
affection which a lively interest in him created, and a conformity
to the advice I have always given him—advice tending to marl.
kst the necessity of adhaing to .the system adopted..by me,
mover to mix in affairs foreign to one's own business. It grkv,:s
me exceedingly that an interpretation has been given to my ict.
ter opposite to my intentions—an interpretation which suppli.s
materials to discussicns irrelevant and ill founded. My dispica.
sure in this case increases at seeing that a similar interpretation
has caused doubts regarding the good faith of an indivitb .1
whose distinguished and honourable character is known to me
by long experience.
I consider you, moreover, as incapable of making use of the
threats which are attributed to you, as the British Govern/Tic-1
is of executing them. In taking this mode of stating to you the
sentiments with which I am animated in the present ernergercy,
I experience the sweet satisfaction of fulfilling a duty which is
incumbent upon me, and I take the opportunity of assuring you
of my perfect esteem.
NO. 5..-LETTIS FROM MR.

TO COLONEL EILOWN,
Milan, Sept. 19.

M. Colonel—lt is nith regret prorortioned to the respect
which I bear you that I learn that the sense of a letter written
by M. Marietti to his son, has been so ill understood as to have
imputed to you the communication of an intention on the part
of the British Government to watch over the latter, 'and to send
him out of England on account of his relations with Bacchini,
a witness in the case of the Queen. I remember that you said
to me, one morning that I was present with you on business,
that you had received a letter from England, stating the inter,-
ference of Joseph Marietti th's affair, and that you could not
but regard such conduct as a little unwise, and foreign to his oc-
cupation in London. I cannot at the same time forget that I
regarded this communication as a simple opinion emanating from
yourself, and very far from the expression of authority or of
menace. As regards what is said on the Mien Bill, of the pro.
visions of which I am ignorant, it is a duty I owe to your cha-
racter, always frank and loyal in all respect; to say, that you
never gave me the least reason to fear E,r the personal security
or the protection of the said Joseph hlarietti.
I can add, that I thought it my duty to beg 111. ltiarietti, the
father, to write to his son, to advise him rot to mix in an affair
so foreign from his occupations, but to restrict himself to the wise
and moderate conduct which has always distinguished him ; and
if in writing to hint his father has made use of strong expressions,
they ought in no wise to be ascribed to you, Colonel Brown, but
sokly to the COA fidunce and paternal affection which dictated them.
woe 4.—Larval roost 311 t. usasurrn, ?U& awns, le wlslicag, aN
unixtatt, NOT WD TIDT:RDAT ZIT LORD LITRRTOOL trtwa tAlistit.

Milan, September 20.
. Dearest Son—l am ever the more confirmed in my maxim
that it insight to have as little as possible to do with the great.
I must say that the Government in question has too strictly in-
terpreted the letter I wrote you, and which has preionted to
the blinister of Police other motives than those 'which realty
originated it, since it is right to tell you that the Snit& Go-
vernment has written an angry letter to Colonel Brown. He
(Colonel Brown), feeling himself much disquieted on this ac-.:
count. made such. an application to Signor D. aceri, and to
Signor Albertonio, that the former begged me to convey to the
said Colonel Brown a letter of mine, which, bi a certoin way
(is eats quai ;night instify him with his Government'
from the too rigorous interpretation given to my firmer. letter.
And after having-written and-re-written, through theater/ km
of the said Signor emeri, draught, of such a letter to be "hewn,
the copy which I enclose to youroaddress was fixed upon. You
will likewise find the copy of a letter which the said Col. Brown
desired from the..said Signor Albettosdo, who gave me the ac-
count contained in the letter' formerly addressed to you. To the
honour of truth I have regarded what Cot. Brown said through
the medium of Signor Albertonio as an act of friendship, to pre-.
van him from being brought into any danger. Nor could I ever
have imagined that such a thing mold have been of as much im-
portance as it has proved. However- that be, to facilitate the
allaying of such a controversy, and to preserve amity with all, I
have thought proper to second it, as you will perceive by the copy.
They wis'aed me to declare that my first letter was the result
of my own simple suspicion, and had no groand to rest upon;
but this I would not allow, because the having named Colonel •
Brown in the way I did, would have beat charged on me as a
calumnious imputation ; and therefore you will see in my letter
sent yesterday to hint (CoL Brown) that I mention my not
having-direct conversation with hint, and derive my informa-
tion from what he caused* to be mid to use by Sig. Albertonio.
Regulate yourself therefore in everything with the greaten
pmdence, in order not to incur other annoyances and other dis-
sadsfactions, which can only produce evil to you;
Your affectionate Father.

SECOND DAY OF THE DEFENCE.

HOUSE OF LORDS.

At five minutes before ten o'clock this morning,
the LORD CHANCELLOR entered the House, and
prayers were read.

Lords PONIONEY and SCARBOROUGH were excused
on account of illness.

•
A person from the Treasury presented Copies of
all the Communications which had passed between
his Majesty's Government and the Queen since the
month of June last, together with Accounts of the
sums of Money advanced by- Governmeneto her
Majesty.—Ordered to lie on the table.
Counsel were then called in, and Mr. Bsouonam
immediately resumed his Address.
MR. BROUGHAM IN CONTINUATION.

How came it to pass, said he, that with no want
of care in the preparation of this case--that with the
greatest display Of skill in the management—that
with the boundless resources possessed and exercised
by those who had to conduct the prosecution, there
yet was a deficiency so remarkable in one `important
respect, as to stnice every hearer upon the production of
the witnesses. He meant the extraordinary want of ta-
lent, as to the.evidence selected to support the ease.
In fact then, the Alps were crossed ; but one witness -
was to be found ; and all the charges were to be 'sup-
ported by a single nymph. Wai it not extraordinary
that from the Capital not one appeared—that not
a single delegite came .from • her Majesty's biding-
place, and, least of all, from the place of her nativity.
All that appeared against her on this side the Alps,
was but a chambermaid or cellar-maid—the 'German