Star.
London, England, 1810-05-10 00:00:00

A person presented papers from the Irish Court of Chseseey
The
Cattle. Judges were ordered to attend on the liblhory Pangs
In the Committee on the Scots and Irish Judges Meet sag-
nsentatiess Bill,
Lard HOLLAND wished to brow if the augussatatims SATs
solarise tithe Scots Judges was cbasged on the saustfisnd as the
previa% Mirka
Lord Vhcoont MELVILLE answered In the addrusattro.
The Lein[ LAUDJIRDAWL doubsed Whacks' tile triad
Would iteAlllsiont.
Lord 'Wu MELVILLE osoosived that the food loortswed
with thelbtroulog royeistFif ilso eouotry, as it Woe oat of ea -
billtbaßas..;tho rtodolrof with had soma/sea* locroosad. .
-* "The Earl of LAX/ERDAL& thought there aogtt so be souse
stoosat Of the
The Earl of ROSSLYWobsorred, that the =Tins of the fund
tem applied to the pubis serska, to which Lord Vbsoust
* 11VVii=t1hboogis the Oarossittos, sod was repos&
thaw
Lord LAUDERDALE called the attendee of the N.M.
•
Lards to the Nabob of the Carnaties Debts Ilk with* wits
read the first time.--Adiourned.

ROUSE OF COMMONS.
Mr. WHARTON brought up several papers pursuant to et.
dar, widish were ordered to be printed.
itlr. ROSE gave notice, that he would, to •mortow, move fur
a Committee to tionsider of the propriety of preventing the im-
portation afore* silks of evyry dew= int. Crust Litwin
and the Weeds of Jersey, Guernsey, . and Saris.
Mr. A. BARING gave notice, that he wail mammary se's.
Idea move the Rouse to take Into consideration the Report of
the Committee on Marine Insurance; and that he would then
move for t repeal of so ntueh of the .341 Gm I. as ceased
insurance to Chartered Companies.
A divisicnreook place on the farther cooskleratioa of the Re.
port of the Gaytonindosere BM; which was carried in favour
of the Bill.

The numbers being—For it.46-..Against k 10--.A4aJorky
The B.eisort of the Aberdeen Herbour Bin was agreed to, after
somo conversation between Mr. ADANA, Mr. FtiltiplkAll, Mr.
W. SMITIII,
-
1 'he Highways and Turnpike Roads Bill were postpooed till
Friday.
SIR FRANCIS suaanr's ACTION AGAINST TIM InItJaANT
AT MACE.

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER.
moved that the Serjeant be called to the Bar, to give
an account of what the proceeding was that had
taken place in respect to him.—Ordered.
The Serjeant having conk to the Bar,
The SPEAKER said the House had been infor-
med he had some communication to make, and de-
sired he would say what it was.
' The Serjeant then stated that he had been called
uptin by a person desiring him to let him have a copy •
of the warrant under which he acted in the arrest of
Sir Francis Burdett ; that he shtwed Lim the warrant;
and that he had since been served with a legal pro-
cos, which he then had in his fend.
The paper was then ordered to be handed to the
table, and read, and purported to 1.)..! a copy of a
writ against the Seleint, for a trespass and assault,
at the suit of Sir Francis Burdett, Bart. John Ellis,
Gray's Inn-square, was indorsed tt (we suppose
as the Solicitor).
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
moved, that the said paper be referred tt) the same
Committee to which that against the Speaker had
been referred.

Sir THOMAS TURTON skid, that from any
thing which appeared on the face of the paper, as he
had heard it read, it was only a copy of arwrit brought
by Sir Francis Burdett against -- Coleman, with-
out any mention or designation of Serjeant of that
House, and might be only an action of one private
individual against another, which no way concerned
the House. He therefore objected to its being re-
ferred to a Committee.

Lord FOLKSTONE said he was not in the
House when they came to the decision of referring
the action against the Speaker to a Committee, or he
should certainly have opposed it. He would there-
fore now take the same objections Of this as he should
have done to the other, as they applied equallres.**
both. He thought it was highly improper to refer
either of them to a Committee, because the House
having, on serious and mature consideration, adopted
certain measures, ought to abide by them and wait
the fair result ' • for unless they meant to influence or
intimidate the Courts of Law from taking any cog-
gizatice of their proceedings, the appointment of a
Committee would be altogether a futile and nuga-
tory measure.
Mr. ADAM said, the reason why be consented to
a Committee to search for Precedents, and to state
faetsi was, that massy Gentlemen, not having consi-
dered the matter as he had done, might have an op 7
portunity of receiving information through that chan-
nel, and thereby be enabled in a more satisfactory
manner to make up their minds ; but to suffer them
to report their opinion to the House, was to his think—
ing an abandonment of its privileges. He was sure
the House had the right to psoceea as they had done,
though that right bad never been tried ; and the point
now to be settled was, what was the best mode of
bringing the matter to the test He wished to call
to the recollection of the House the Act which passed
in 1770, and deprived Members of one of their privi.
lay* viz that of being secured against personal ac-
tions being served on them, and also against the ar.
rest of their servants. He begged to shew what was
the course of proceeding pursued by the House,
against those who were rash and daring enough to
offend against this privilege before it was abolished.
The mode was this : the parties whose names were
to the process as Plaintiffs were called to the Bar of
the House, and entrained whether they were.the per.
sons who gave orders for these proceedings, and if
they acknowledged it, the House immediately can.