Star.
London, England, 1827-06-14 00:00:00

into security for payment of the sum due, or that, not-
withstanding the terms of the order, the Solicitor might
be at liberty to pursue the ordinary remedy for the
recovery of the amount due to Losusim
directed the case to be tnentionea. on Friday. • •
The greater part of the day was.occispied with hear:
ing Cause Petitions. only four or five of which were
disposed •f. His Lordship rose before three o'clock,
.and postponed the remainder of the Petitions until
Saturday, Friday next being the first day of Trinity
'T-

A paper was posted at the end of the Hall, declaring
that for the better dispatch of business, the Vice
Cursamtuma, during Trinity Term, would hear excep-
tions and fir ther directions.
VICE CHANCELLOR'S COURT, ham t 3.
The Vice-Cum.:m.ll.oB disposed of all the cause
petitions, fifty-eight in number, which stood in the
paper. In the course of the day, the following notice,
respecting the arrangement of business, was posted up
in the Court :

44 The Lord Chancellor. considering that, in many cues now set
down for exceptions and further directions, it may be of great im-
portance to the suitors to obtain decrees or decrecal orders, in such
time as to enable the Registrars to draw them up, and, the Wo-
tan to proceed to execute the same, before the closing of the dikes
his Trinity vacation, and that these objects COMM be attainable if
the hearing of such cases should be deferred to the time usually ap-
pointed for further directions after Trinity Term, doth think it ex-
pedient that the Vice Chancellor's Court should proceed to hear ex-
ceptions and farther directions on the second day of next Trinity
Term, and continue thereon de die in diem, with the exceptiosiof the
usual Seal days for modals. But this, however, isnot to retied*
the Vice Chancellor from hearing any cause or matter which, in
his judgment, may be resulted to be brought forwaxd,under special
for urgent clunrastance%
COURT OF KING'S BENCH,. Jona ls.
THE ZINO V. DANIELL.
This was a proceeding by way of wire facia., to re•
call certain letters patent granted by his Majesty to the
defendant, for the intention of certain improvements in
the mode of dressing woollen cloths, and preparing and
using wire cards, as applicable to that, purpose. Two
grounds were established for vacating the letters patent ;
first, that the invention was not new; and second, that
the specification on which the patent was granted was
obscure and unintelligible. After i full discussion of the
merits of the case, the Jury, under the Learned Junos's
directions, found a verdict for the Crown.

CONSPIRACY.

Wm rota s. am. enevair, CIIAZIAS CLIVINLY, AID /11131111 r KILLS.
. This was an indictment against the defendants for a.
,conspiracy. The indictment charged, that Cleverly and
Hutcheson, being in partnership as linendrapers in
Chiswell-street, were possessed of stock in trade, and
having become insolvent, the three defendants conspired
,to prevent the creditors from receiving their just debts.
The facts were these t Cleverly and Hutcheson, being in
pa embalmed situation, applied to 'Mills for money,
Hitr
vo advanced a certain sum, upon security being given
payameni t of saagmeainAstleirc juice
aofndbaCulkervuerpltycy was
appeared upon investigation, that the defendants had
taken goods which should have been divided among
the creditors. Mills, who appeared to have acted as the
friend of the bankrupts ;introduced Hitherto as his at-
torney, who took instructions for a deed of assigumeat,
sad gave his advice as to the conduct of the lenskrepts
towards their creditors. A bill to a large ammo NU
**de out by him for his services, and the wheibrof the
transactions, on the part of the defendants, were alleged
to be fraudulent, and the effect rif a conspiracy to de-
fraud the creditors. The above facts were proved by
Hutcheson, the partner, and odsar witnesses.
The COMMON SERGEANT woolen heard on behalf of
the defendants, and contended that it was unreasonable
to suppose that Milbarne, who had always borne the
'character of a respectable attorney, could act * the
manner imputed to him.
The Loan CURES JUSTICE put it to the JOl7 to say
whether the charge was substantiated; observing, that
in case they had any. doubt, the evidence as to character
might be received in support of favourable considera-
tions, although such evidence could not stand against
•direct and satisfactory testimony.
The Jury found all the defendants Guilty.
COURT OF COMMON PLRAS, Jars 13.
DUTTON O. SARUM
This was an action for money had and received.—
The plaintiff is a young man, who assisted in his bro-
ther's counting-house, in the City; and having, in the
month of June, 1825, when he was only nineteen years
of age, taken it into his head to marry, without con-
sulting his family, be called upon the defendant, whp
is an appraiser, and gave directions to have a house
taken for him, and he also gave directions to the de-
fondant to get it completely furnished, giving him at
the same time 1001. for the purpose; that sum was
expended by the defendant for the lease and fixtures
of the house. But Dutton's family having awe&
rained the expense which be was incurring, called upon
the defendant, and countermanded the orders which
had been given by young Dutton. In consequence of
these instructions Barnes relet the house, and received
1001. from Mr. Hewlett, the Gentleman who became
the tenant, for the house. This 1001. the defendant re-
insed to give to the plaintiff,. alleging that the furniture
ordered for the house was resold at a loss, which he bad
to sustain. One of the articles ordered was a bed, which
was charged to Dutton at 504 but which was sold by
Barnes for 251. Other articles were charged consider-
ably above the cod price, which was what Barnes had
to pay for them. But no account was ever rendered to
the plaintiff of those articles, although he had been re.
peatedly applied to by the plaintiff's brothers, whose
father promised to indemnify the defendant for any loss
sustained by him in taking the house.
The defendant's Counsel contended that the plaintiff
was liable for the difference between the prices char
for the furniture and what it hadactually been sold er.
Barnes had also paid some rent for the house.'
The Loan Carat JUSTICE left it to the Jury to say
what necessary expenses the defendant was put to in
consequence of the instructions which he had received.,
—Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 571.
P REROGA.TIVR COURT, Ins -4S.
PALPET C. DAUM!.

Sir J. Ntcuou. proceeded to give judgment. is Ibis
case, in which a question arose as to the validity of a
will. The testator was a veterinary surgeon, residing.
at Worcester, and died in the end of last year, leaving
three sisters "and al; brothers, and personal property
amounting to above ,0001. His will was dated in Oct.
1824, and by it he left 5001. to his eldest sister, Mrs.P► ice,
and only 8004 in small legacies to all his other brothers
and sister s. Mrs. P. was also appointed residuary legatee,
and in that character would, of course, take the whole
busk of the property. The will was properly drawn
up and executed, and she only question was, whether
the testator was of a sound and disposing mind at the
pitiod i f iiseicention ? h appeared that the deceased
was a man of SCIWC haliti and of cOlisfsicrable intent-