Star.
London, England, 1816-11-22 00:00:00

.

-777

ortienst, to the Jule of law, you are_not permitted
me
Lord:Copt RAY af--" There is much more to statis
but it is s.. connected with the facts of Davidson's
'ease, that no separation can be effected. I shall leave
you; therefore, to pronounce your lodgment, without
stain:, my case. The series of injuries, inhumanities,
and injustice, which I have received from the Bench,
from perjured• w:tnesses"
Mr, Justice AntiyrT" You are not entitled here
to abuse the Bench, and to accuse persons who have
been examined on oath. The Court is ready to pay
all attention to ariy eircumso.nces relating to the
charge of which the Jury have found you guilty. yo
any observations of that kind the Court will attend,
and will glove them all due consideration."
Lord Comittapx—" Your bird,hi pi are aware that
I li‘vauaecl every endeavour to obtain an investiga.
this of 'my ease.. You know, when I came to this
-Cert. that 1 war refused a new trial, under the pre.
'glee of it rule of. Court. I was ref Used the privilege
iOf putting n alificiavits, because the persons who made
them were called on trial; but that privilege had since
been allowed in Another case."
Mr. Justice Bracer That is not the fact; and
I sin bound to state it, because I know what has
been tote conduct of the Court. I will therefore ex-
plain the business. Where a party comes to move
fer_ a new trial, he is not entitled to make use of the

affidavits of persons who had been called as witnesses,
of to use the affidavits of those who might have been
Where. a party comes to receive the sentence
of the COurt, it is competent to receive the affidavits
of persons who had.heen, or might have been, exa
mined at the trial, in mitigation or aggravation of
punishment. The mistake arises from persons, not
. conversant with the practice of the Court, not under-
, ttanding the distinction between one case and the
other, hazarding an opinion on this point. I have
pointed out the distinction. It is the practice of every
dal to receive, in mitigation or aggravation of punish-
ment, the affidavits of persons who were, or might
have been, eaatiained at the trial:. on the other hand,
it is the practice, not of modern times, that, when
moving for a new trial, you cannot make use of the
affidavits of such persons."
Lord COCURAWIL—•I6 I have only again. to say to
TsuiLiArdshkp, that 1 consider the matte in my ad.
&est relevant to my case. .You hare decided other-
V9e. and I regret that 1 cannot lay it before you. I
do not wish to enter into a verbal statement, whidit
isagla he misrepresented. Words might, in that case,
be prat recto my mouth, And afterwards argued against.
Therefore I must submit to whatever decision your
Lordships cent: to, instructed as your Lordships'
Minds appear to be on that which you have not
heard."
.oe. Justice HOLROYD" Your Lordship must
nosierstaod, that we are ready to hear. any thing reit-
Yelps If you, can shew that the matter you have alto.
• deco is in any degree relevant, we shall be most at.
Motive to it. BUJ it you cannot show, that, die opi.
nionstated . must be obeyed.. In the discharge of
our duty to your Lordship, we must proceed as we
Mean-to do -to all others hereafter—and were we to'
miter you to proceed, others might also introduce
miner totally irrelevant, which could not answer the
judginect of the law, its its due and proper course."
Lord Cacti haat Your Lordships must be aware
that I have no other means of :hewing the relevancy
*talon matter I hold in my hand than by reading it
to the Conn."
• Ur. Justice BATLLPY, after a short pause, desired
Mr. Istattawer to proceed.
Mr. iVIAKILYAT said, that in praying the judgment
of the Court on the defendant in this case he begged
to state, that it was not asked with any degree of
asperity by the prosecutor, notwithstanding what had
been said on the trial. But their Lordships could
not wonder, after the slander so widely diffused, and
by the inatrumentality of the defendant himself (he
lia!ring handed over his speech• to a Newspaper Re-
porter that it might appear in print) that the Marshal
qt the King's Bench should look forward for an op.
portunity of Wily stating his conduct, in order that
the recommendation of the Jury, which was produced
by the false -assertions contained in that speech,
should be viewed by the Court in its proper light.--
On the occasion. to which lie alluded, the defendant
went into a det4il of all the Marshal was supposed to
have done, without adducing any proof whatever. It
was an address dr6wn up in the closet, and intended
to be circulated. widely abroad. It was published in
every form—not only by the 'Reporter to whom it.
wis delivered, but in the shape of a pamphlet. The
Marshal therefore looked forward to the present day
as the period when he could justify his conduct, and
clear his character—hoping that se should not be
found to have misconducted himself in the manner
represented by the defendant at the trial. What were
the misrepresentationi on the trial that produced the
reccmmendation of the Jury ? So far as questions
were or could be asked of the witnesses, those ;nitre-
- presentaiions were negatived. But the defendant
lead an cpportnnity of making a speech, which he
determined to do without cling evidence; and by
this means he could advance what calumnies he
ph-aged, Without the fear of their being corrected at
she t;rne • kle thus reddered it necessary for the
Ka dial to come forward on the present day, town.
tradict his statements. Lord Cuohfane was brought
up to receive the iudgment. •of the Court for an of-
fence much less serious now than it fianser:y was ;
for, by the Common Law, even an escape from the
stocks, or, from the custody of a trustable, was liable
an the peoelty that attached to the commission of to.
lofty.. Iq this case, the defendant slfas committed to
t!le custody of tilet.blarsbal, and remained . charged
with .a fine of £RIOO, for.wlsich most unquestionably
the prosecutor would have been lEchle,, as io other
espkpe, if the defendant hull not .been re.
taker?. He was alto committed to remain in the pri-
son of the. King's Bench', for a period of twelve
months, of which between three and four were
tinetpired, at the time of the escape. An escape
toott plate , the. *Omer of which their Lordships
would sea the atiaolsalt was ignorant of up !to the
piesent day. When the escape was:effected, the
Marshal offered a very considerable reward for the..
appieheusioo of the &tenable(' which he had paid,
Two hundred gujiwaX. were given.to awe individual,
and one hundred swipe* mos divided amooptiOWll.
I.li. It, WAS. .allege 4 .4340 deka:tot at 'ma Welk
that the Marshal, wo, willing 10 compromise the be.
suv•is with hiin—aed that bit *dial/bin socket an.

_

. . . .
. .
.. : z.".•
'stiuctions to hire* owls to' km thi t
of:Lord Gillian: iretheillitsf bf &Mr** 0. II c
letniesore. The hitaltshal hgf,3llosizaer,' in unitgligps f
cat:terase, stied that he hatl4o4s tilltin tilt. 111,1
sttuctlans of "any person Wharseater-:O at his conesic
had been dictated by his own judg As to ,the
allegation that a negociatien hid beenentled into
for the return of the defendant, every OR. of thA
statement was'distinctly denied by. the Morelia'. He'
was certainly desirous ' ting back his prisoner—
and thought that the„.
dish`
Rohe returned, without
coercion: the less dist,' ul it would be to himself.
But he had no idea whatever of foregoing the prose.
eution. Distinct overtures were made to the Marshal
when he was preferring his bill before the Grand Jury,
to stop the proceeding, by the clerk of Mr. )ray, his
Lordship's solicitor, but he refused to see the defen-
dant, because he felt it to be his duty to the public to
Igo on with the prosecution. His motives were three-
fold—first, to deter others from acting in the same
way—neat, he wished to prevent such an escape in
future, by discovering the means by which it was
effected, and he hoped souse evidence on that point
would cone out on the trial—and lastly, he was
anxious to do away the idea of any connivance on
his part. He never held on: to any person the slightest
hope that the prosecution would be relaxed. The
next thing alleged againsothe Marshal was, that when
the defendant was brought back lie was placed in
the strong room.' On this, point the affidavit of the
Marshal was perfectly satisfactory. There was, he
said, no place in the prison stronger than that from
which the defendant had escaped, except the_ two
strong looms, and the most convenient of these (that
which was boarded) was selected for his Lordship's
reception. The detendrint stated, on his trial, that
he was confined in a pestilential dungeon for 26 days
—but he did not state that the Marshal was anxious
to place him in a better situation as soon as he cupid
with safety tohimselt. The Learned Gentleman took
a review of the conduct which the Marshal exercised
towards Lord Cochrane, as disclosed in his affidavit,
contending that he had not exceeded the bounds of
his duty, but had only exercised a proper degree
of vigilance and caution in securing his prisoner.
—On the 13th of March, the Marshal, for the first
time, heard of Lord Cochrane's indisposition, and he
immediatelysent Mr. Saumarez, the Gentleman who
attended his own family, to his Lordship. On that
day, his Lordship received a certificate, which was
nut shown to the Marshal, until his removal from the
`strong-room took place. Instead of spewing the
ceititicate signed by Drs. Buchan and Saumarez to
the Marshal, he took the circuitous route of sending
it to the Secretar y of State's Office—and then com-
plained of the Marshal for not attending to that of
which he knew nothing. On the 15th of March, it
was intimated to the Marshal that, it Lord Cochrane
was not removed, ill consequences would result to
his health. After consulting a few minutes, and en-
deavouring to procure security for the fine of dll,OOO
from Lord Cochrane, in order, should his Lordship
again escape, that he might be indemnified, he con-
sented, at his own risk, to remove him to a place
which he did not think secure. Than such was his'
feeling appeared evident—for, after the Defendant
was removed, the Marshal employed additional
watchmen, who were discontinued when he was libe-
rated. What inhumanity, what wantonness, what
torture was the Marshal then guilty of ? All.that
had been alleged at the trial was answered with the
utmost cif cumstantialit7. His Lordship asserted,
that he broke out of prison for a laudable purpose.—
He did not know what that laudable purpose was.
Certainly he found his way, some time after, to tis
seat in the House of Commons. Whether hilt Lord.
ship's purpose was laudable, it was not for him to
inquired but, undoubtedly, any priloncr making his
escape, might advance the same excuse. He knew
no circumstance to which the Noble Lnrd had alluded,
to take away from the criminality of the act, that
might not apply, in any particular instance, when the
Prisoner chose to make his escape.
Mr. Gunomr, un the same saute side, only wished
to add one observation upon the good intentions of
the Noble Lind in escaping : his design was stated
to be, that he might outfid in his place in the House
of Commons to complaio of injustice. This allegation
was disproved in the first place by its own absurdity;
for it his Lordship had postponed his complaint for
nine months, he could without much injury to his
cause have postponed it for twelve, when his sen-
tence would have expired. But it was equally clis-.
proved by his. own conduct : though so anxious to
escape to prefer his charge, and effecting his escape
ou,the '7th or Sth of March, hi had never made his
appearance in the House of Commons until the 21st
of that month. It was fit drat those who nude such
pretensions should make their conduct correspond
with those pretensions.
Mr. ADOLPHUS was retained far the prosecution,
but declined addressing the Court. _
Mr. Justice Bayutv,,after consulting with.the other
Judges for a few minutes, proceeded to deliver the
judgment of the Court :—" Sir Thomas Cochrane,
commonly called Lord Cochrane—You stead before
the Court to receive its sentence in consequence of
having been convicted of the offence of escapiog from
the King's Bunch prison, while you were in custody
1 under a commitment from this Court. But to state
the occasion which brings your Lordship here is suf-
ficient to satisfy every oispasvonate mini of the pro
priety of the course which has been adopted in pre-
venting you from going into the irrelevant matter
which you proposed tootle consideration:cat the Court.
Whether a man of the name of Davidson Wai,or was
not properly'acquitted, was a question which had no
relation to the matter before the Court. You had
been comMitted by sentence of this Court : of the
fitness of that sentence it is not now out; *business
to inquire. Of the present Meniberi of the COurt,
I em the only one who concurred Mthat- sentence ;
and I am, unfortunately,' also the may surviving
Judge present, who joined in the (pillion delivered
open the motion of a new trial. I then acted,'
as I shall alwayi act, under the recollection that
I was bound by the sacred obligation 91 an: oath.—
Into that question it is not our' duty new tb pia.—
The sentence having beets prottounced. for your his.
' prisonment, it was your Loriphip's•duty to acquiesce
uti it;. arid to Obey the laws 001 that crittiiti*-Lof Which,
yen •lire a. 'Ant. Wf4eNieetoigl*Oe. /s**, 0411'
"Wet
feelings, you had titschbice,b,'W;felititit te!
obi penishusearthe Court thought nicessiti to Whet.
1),/ eseastog.trom the plate of Our toeinettte, Uts, you
*itt only acted in defiance of the !turf of the realm as
.
1

• •
Ar tot. elf; you *seed the effi%'r
4 the Court, icilw.l.aa dine you were entru.ted,
In a certain degree 4 hatferdvand you put him ado
Oft tre:onsidaake expense. Vithat might !nary in-
' teitioneavflither hinocent or criminal,i tis impossible
for us to,know : that passed in your own (Med, and ,
in yaitown mind only ; but in law there could he no
t.justifiableeieuse.'• Them might have been eground
ter mitigation, if before . that cant the hers tips of
your impritoemeat had been increased, or if you had
endtirtd undue severity by the misconduct of die in.
dividnel to Whine custody you were confided :
'had that been tha:•Case, and had it been knows
to any person besides yourself, you might have
adduced evidence of it at the trial; but no witness
was then brought -forward, either to attempt to prove
a justifiable excuse or any thing in mitigation.—
On this occasion also we have seen oo affidavits to
that effect—nothing to skew misconduct hi those who
had yea in charge, by undue and unusual severity,
er by any increase of the hardships of imprisonment.
Affidtvits have, i 'wryer, been handed in en the
other side, by which it appears that as much indul-
gence had been sheen to you by the Marshal *as was
1
consistent with a due regard to his duties; and even
1 atter tie period t f ) our return, you experienced as,
much lenity anal con-,ideratain as the nature of the
case would perto;t. At the trial that occurred, to
which the C. urn is always glad to listen, and which,
in passing sentence, it always keeps in view,-it Ap-
peared that, on being brought back to prison. rou.
were confined iii the strong roam, and to a person of.
your habits and condition, that certainly must have
been an aggravation ot per confinement. It was
not more than was necessafy, and was justified by
your previous misconduct ; but it seems probable,
from what occurred at th trial, that by it your
health was in some degree impaired, and these cit. 1
cumstances induced the Jury to recommend your
Lordship to the merciful consideration of the Court
on the judgment to be pronounced upon your offence.
It must always be a great gratification to those ap-
pointed to, administer justice, and to me individually'
I am sure it is so, to be able to attend to this sug-
gestion; but we must at the same time look to future
consequences, mid to the situation in which other
persons are placed. It seems, that in cohsequence
of your escape. a very large pecuniary loss has been
incurred by the individual to whose cate you were
intrusted, and to whom, according to the affidavits,
you ought to have made a better return. But the'
Court has taken all the facts into, its consideration,
both the additional pressure thrown upon you when
you were sent back to the King's Deed. by the na-
ture of your more strict confinerneet, and the injury
your health sustained, which were the grounds tit the.
recommendation of the Jury ; ar.d it troth order and
adjudge. that for this offence you pay to the King a
fine of +eloo, -led that you be cnnimit:ed to the ctn.
wily of the Marshal of the Marsh:thee until that tine
be paid."
Lord
.Cochrane remained on the floor for a few mo-
ments, but the tine not being paid, the upstaff was
sent for, and to the custody of that officer lie WAS
committed.
In passing through Westminster Hall. his Lordship
was repeatedly cheesed by a. crowd of persons wne
were waiting to hear the result.—He was afterearJs
conveyed to the Ki4's Bench prison, and placed hi
the apartments above the lobby which he had owl.'
pied after his escape until the expiration of his sentence.
I Lord Ellenhortnigh was not on the Bench. The
Judges present were Mr. Justice Bailey, Mr. Justice
Abbott, and Mr. Justice Holroyd.
• The fellowing Judgments were also given by the
full Ceuta, upon the motions of the kraantaav
GENERAL :
William Whittle and William Hamlin, for ob-
structing Excise Officers in the execution of their
duty; sentenced to six months imprisonment.
William Hopkin, for an offence against the qua-
rantine laws, in landing (tom a ship folder quaran-
tine ; a fine of €2OO and six months imprisonment.
James. Browne, James Feint, Thomas Lowther,
Thomas Simmons, George Simmons, George Shari.
der, and Thomas Hughes, for resciiiiig an impressed
seaman ; nine months ipiprisonment each.
COURT OP COMMON PLEAS, NUV.,2I.
ILIGERS W. POOLg. •
MT. Serjeant LENS and Mr. Serjeant VAUGHAN this
day skewed cause against the rule calling.ort the de-
fendant. as Deputy Sealer of the Court, to account
for baying, refused to seal a writ of calaies ad rerpon•
daldram t 0 the day of the festival of St. Luke. It
was contended, that by the statute of the-sclBnd 6th
oh Edw. VI. this was numbered amang the holidays
on which officers of the Court were not bound to at-
tend to the ordinary business of.suitor. hod that, as
their attendance on such days was AsvOlUlltary act, it
was not unlawful in them to accept an additional lee
for such attendance. But. whatever might be the
opinion of the Court as to that-point, the present rule
must be discharged, since it must have for its object
to obtain an attachment against the defendant as
having acted.crimitrelly, whilst, in fact, he had re-
ceived no tee whatever, and had merely stood upon
his legal right of not actingon a Parliementarr holi.,
day. All that had been settled in the former cases
WAS, that the additional-fee so paid-mast be relonded,
but in this instance no fee whatever tied been paid.
The SOLICITOR Gin/Mier. rind Mr: SetiennONSLOW,
in support of the rule, argued that the statute of mod.
ward VI. was intended for prornotiog use observance
of religious ceremonies, and thetel)re the officer ought
not, in legal stricsness, to be at his office on that day ;
btu-being there, and seiliegewrits for some, he wes
notjustified.in refusing othets. Bolidefs were made
to be kept, and not to be sold. Such a practice would
enable the officer to make. pttferences and to vary his
fees. which co:Ail nit be within' the alloWatice of the
Court.

The Court were of (Tinian that ho:h parties in this
case had stood upon the sttictest point of etiquette.
These holidays cerrainiy nevr were intended tor the
mere ease of the officer, and therefore he had no right
tatake any addiiioual fee on such gri:und. But where
a practice had .long Frevailed and grown into an or-
dinary
usagek,the Court would-not impute crimins-
lity in aciliering to ir, especially as the party might
bcingliis actitwa• to recover such damages as he had
Isustained. It would be much better if the number of
lolitliniwponnie . custniked 4. but it was impossible to
an Ittaolvert ;vim any person for doing (that .which. b?
Acts Csij'arliameot be had a distinct right to do, via.
in this case, of abstaining from doing certain acts.
Ault disthargeo with tow

rowcg.

IVA NsI(III3OUSE. —Yestt Way Sylrafer
in custody on suspicion of robhifig the
and Norv.izli Mails, underwent a tint,-
and were discharged.
hrIARLIOItnIAGI/-STRIZP.T.—.••BI'ROLARY
AIAN --Yesterday Satnild Aliiler way
charged with burgiary at Cie house
in liolbfsrn, and stealirr,•hats.. %fi.e ,
of the examination on Monday, when
that the prisoner had charged two inn,
were discharged. li, was ft):!y clump
Bow•ssitiu.—Yesterday W. K.;rig,
wife, were re-examined,
forging a cheque for 4.1500, purpor
signatures. of Gostiug,„ Ferrier3, and
to defratrl Sir J. Lubbock i:nd Co. T,
given in our Pipe? of Friaaz last wer
but Sir NATIIANIEL, CON/INT said, 33 1
read over to-itl.e primers, it was unneci
capitulate them. He should, therefor,
• troiie prisoners ; but as tbe. evidence

tLe femirie. the was ciiichargei

WI-ANC:Una Accurs s W
at ekaen o'chidt, a most nictanchAy
(Int...n-6e wail:wag:ions Weather,
Srorrotto and DISETSeN, of the C(
Lieutenant Liamati, cl the Last In
service, who citric home passenger if
an absence of one )CATS, were protege,
boat to North Corner, it became reef
extreme aAitation of the sta, to altei
boat, and one of the -officers ra\hrr
shift his seat I(.r that purpose, when tl
upset, and Lieutenants Hulniar and
unfortunately drowned.. Lien ttnant St
watermen, two in number, were Lived
to the Jetty Head of the Dock-74d,
by thi spring of the Beelzebub, ut
lowered td them by the warden. and
rather singular that the watermen are
recently saved the lives of Gentril and
Neither of the bnd;es have yet been '
Janet Grant and John Cowie. in .
c"-Mount, from the parish of :Strachan
of Fordoun, on Satni day evening,
were overtaken. by a severe snow-start
and after wandering for some time,
dirough fatigue, to sit down about a
greens. Cowie. having reviously
panion in his greawcat„tnade several
the first part of the light, to recove,
not succeoing, he get back to whir
in a few hour!: became insensible.
with great difficulty, when the niorni
to get to Know-grkens, where she
and treated with it:eel% humanity ;
brosat tonne, and although still c.
tradually rec,ivering.—lmmethatel:
Know-gietos. seerch was made tot
found stiff and cold, and comtd w;
He was latoit.6ht honte to his taiii?7
all the recommended for
pended,anirnation were tried by Di
after about bit hours incessant labcitst
cheerfully n,sisted by all around hi
say that gill their humane'ezrrtiots

Ex.F.CUTIoN%-....Yriter,..1 st7irninl
eiglat o'clock,Mr.sSheritT ICIRnr ant
riff, togtther with the Under Marsh
rstity, atterded ll•zwte, preprat
val of Re&ri S.vith aud Charlet Pirrtiet
Monday senteuced to death tor thc
Thomas Johnson, Captain -of the
about thirty leagues from Algiers; tt.
she place appointed to carry into efft
mandate of the law. Almost imme
'commission of the horrid act, the de!
became repentant, and continued
ment. Some time previous to the
had so fit mly made up his mind tr
nilested a wish to be placed wii
and be wrote to Mr. NkWMAN tor
Mr. Nawst.tu could not acsittreKe
One of the most singular circumsta+
tended any person executed latet
Both the prisoners being quite
signed to their tare, lay down to sleep
and twelve o'clock on Wcdoesdav
very sound until four o'clock, wl
in much perturbation, and the noi,
was accompanied awoke his cowry
the cause being inquirtd into, lip sal
That Brock and Gillman (who veer,
executed for the murder of tuo'

Fox revenue cutter) were .to have
in his (Forney's) presence ; he sa
lift the axe, the fatal Wow was gi/
the expression of agony that toh
Moody consequence produced the
uttered. Tay wsre attended by
Newgate, the Rev. Mr. •BAKEtt,
VessEv, the latter of. whom v..ccerr.
Cart. A little before n;rie o'ciodc
to the cart. Finney h.id a Ham
over which Siti;th d with- we;
.cavalcade 'stud lixecutien
. .
past te It, and betore
plete, the unktuy men sene taunt.
A young mot of the name of WI
a wholesale 'hotise at Nottingham,
book cut from his inside poCket'r
whilst looking at the maletactof
Newgate. There was a 45 J 341.!
in the hook, several provincial uut
of etch:lnge for acceptance. •

• - MARI/JED.
'At.t!se Menge Of Ratisen, the'•.s•h inst.
Calm to. to Cathtrins Ann, thivit daugt
Cock, Ministertlnit.
At i'utref, !be tI th Vostoosent
;0 Ann, ridtot dull:ter of Alessi

1)1E0.
At Otero Valle), esPate, in the island o;
of August bet, Mr. Andrea. !trvenson,
At t'atti4ster Stalth, ,war
of a Jropy, aged 74, Mr. *Ralph Cowler
two years, has uncle• gone the op. r taw:
• PRICK OF S'ICCKS
Rank Stock 2.3:-.4 lad a St,
s per Ct. Red. attlif Inti!A Bonds
Ditto Cons. 63i 6.t hip. AWL •ft
4 per emits: 71If 77t 78 I Etc:scatter MU VI-Ogre'
&per Cent. Navy 9541.11. • I Cans. roma&
Long Anna. lti I-I t
• 1.1)N1).)N• ed ny.l.tvat. ri. r,
kubLake4l there, an 4 a: Op 6:ar-Jf4ce, foopii

-• '
r
•
the M 0 ' • 71 t. 1 •
/IT BY kV/ .• •
E•
e Ettve the lap
m•trtlt men • X pl
7nnii•ted foe eli6l W.
I • Lcmpr Artril°n
c!'r MIR to he • we usittY 1
4.1 Co. kinth
The frte`,
14 B
Pere Telt,
as they 1,1 rDow
trosecesisiry , • Vac
tact- c•itrwt th • iota
e was 11:144,
t•ed, its of 1
4mdsy won; as La
ale ad
itteiilein (van, • •
A. Licilimmt
Cornkatis, xi•...•
In Jla Com°4l' EfOR
inthat trop aft,
;:, a dmi
Tcsso,7, fr„,ll lOW
to rbeic,m,
dim,lll4ll
✓ suiltitTly t 1
sate bolt
nd lbhttsos
Stopf rdAgdu astr,
red, by s • • ~
d, %%hitt they s*ll
until topes • sai
nd soiuritt hs
are the vale sitlin
n totted ASP
crossing the ,
free
e 90, pl
ere
le7lllltueer(arlhaan,awerri Isis
lui,linenr.adiaea:lii.fiksset4Wwrtthiwttil,t:'Ntntly,bihtlitediliiaNioirs.lll
PK/
over the road; , t,
site
net Gr Pak. lir"
; she WAS nett Sod
cor Ened to beds isisit•B
Ply on I:er itrirrit "1".:
3 T.viqi a coal •
's house, w
or restating set. uot
Dr. Chntrun; bat, rlB
:nor, in wincisbe wits
him. we lament to
:s prc;red in 'tin. pi 10,1
ling, at hall pia I
and the Under Sis
arshal of the Adai, a U‘l,.
tip nrittoq to the rear •on
.tsrheg, wito Mere Loud,
the wilful itandell
c creole afvwfair,
to Eieemiceidaits
effect die lasi t Ao
'media tely miter 6 wi
deluded ntsistatt6
I IC/ to the last
their WA. Furth , •
'to die, that he a 1 , A
fflith the coniemnt "
'r that purpose
ce in thaSrequest, •
stances that has •
ely is the followil
.
e composed and I 1 .
sleep between eleti
tam
day night, and des ae
when Forney aga •
noise with which
trade (Smith). t t I
said, that he ti 'ts
were some time • snot
o of the crew of 1
ire their heath Olt •
saw Ow esecut •
ig,i,iviennw,ed,ind
is—haenhed
,he Itidlous shriek
by the Ozdinny
, and the Rey. t
;
,Irpanied t...trn in • t
c. k. they %tete I:shcc •
vet Lock iii his
groat attetitino. . •
Drick about ha
Ceririttocy brisg cc I
inched into sterna) I
Webtincath. clerk I sit
• Ihid his peck t. ti
yeste•Jay tuutio'r •Ia
:tors defiiirtitig ft' ' ell
ar.k. of n 4 .1%
uotes, sod some b 4
istittr a the Rev. Wi:4
it Alesande? !tier'llsrl Amaa.
Kt ;tip, &apt, 'ter. ,
of Jamaiza, in the m tow
111, tyrgeint.
r-Street, an :!:r 10 t' „__
vlov, with, klir lig tl4llll
iti..pinet.
I~'!'Lltl)At.
a ,tt.ek
a Bonds 1617 Pr
.
:irqusr toAst pr.