Star.
London, England, 1817-08-04 00:00:00

LAW FRl.L.lcßive.e.

COURT 01 CHANCERY, AUGUST la
ittlriGC O lIYAM.
The toms givinx judgment in
this case, stated, fiat t' cane -lore the Court in the
shape of a bill tilr.l, ealtiug m die plaintiff to pa,
into Clint a sorra of aCCBO, (.4. which the defendant
was trustee,and that the dekidant 'night be rernosed
from .the trusteeship of that noon.), for a Mrs. Win
terbottom. It appeared by the b ii. that Susan Bridge
wan, in 1811, martied to a prcon named Winter-
bottom ; and that the plaintiff settl.-LI on herself the
the suns 44280, wit:: remainder to her Children but
it she shntilii have no children, she might'herlueath it
to whoin.sim.thought proper. She had but one child
who diet infancy, and it was improbable ahe would
have and. more. as she wa•; separated from het
husband. Mrs. Winterbot tons had sworn, that Hyani,
who was appainted her trustee, had recently led sec
a lite, and had he tiblit:d to part with all his real
and personal property to pay his debts, that she was
afraid of her property, it it should fall into his hands ;
to accomplish which Hyam had brought an Action to
compel Bridge to pay him over the 11280 against her
consent, of which she had given him notice, in order
to put a stop to the action. In his answer, Mr. Hyam
contradicted all that had been sworn by Mrs. Win-
terbottom, about the badness of his life, or his having
been obliged to part with all his property to pay his
debts. Mr. Hymn and his Solicitor both swore that
the action to compel Bridge to pay over the 4280 to
Mr. Hyam was entered with the knowledge, and even
at the request cf Mrs. Winterbottom, who had told
them that she received her interest of the money very
irregularly ; and finally that Hymn had been obliged
to pey 420, being the Solicitor's bill, whir prepared
the deed for settling this 0280 on Mrs. 'Wintethot-
i..m. Looking at the whole case, his Lordship saw
no reason to think that Hymn had acted any other part
than that of a careful trustee; and he therefore ordered
that the money should be raid into Court before the
next Seal; and that an account of Mr. Hyam's claim
should be taken. in order to his being paid out of the
money so to be paid into Court.

ItUSIILBY V. JERWINGNAIf.
The LORD Cirasiorra.uou proceeded to give judg.
ment in this use, calling upon the defendant to pay
into the, plut £6,715, due on the purchase of an
estate. It appeared that the defendant had pnrchaled
the laropemy
.oi,question in the name of Another per-
son, but really for himself. He had, howAvors become
dissatisfied rift the purchase; and it appeittvds was
of opinion that he might put an end to the bargain
by forfeiting the deposit. He had, however, entered
into possession, and had had tronsactions with the
tenants. His Lordship therefore thought that, looking
into all the cis cumstances of the case, it was right that
he should be held to the bargain —Order refused.

SUFFOLK ASSIZES.
LAMBERT AND Wlli 9. TAYLOR.

This was an action for an assault upon the plaintiff
Mrs. Lambert, with a horsewhip in the defendant's
house in June last. The defence was that the &ten.
dan: had repeatedly warned the wile off his premises.
—Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 410
TOONE V. THE INHABITANTS Or DOSSIKNI AND CLATDON•
This was an action, she Act a f Geo I. giving the
party, whose property was destroyed by fire, wilfully,
maliciously, and feloniously, the Means of getting
compensation against the Hundred. The fire bap.
pened to the plaintiff's property in Somersham.—
Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages £l2O.