Star.
London, England, 1818-06-06 00:00:00

,
ice" 1004 'ID • S !te%%. I•

• ,

its egations, when Parliament

sh-oul aam assembler -
IWsbisiroraordinary that the Ho-
-%
nonrab e tleman should have abandoned his in-
present Session. The House would re-
' I presented a similar Petition in
. discussion had thus taken place
would also recollect, that he had pre-
Petition in the course of last year.
found to contain charges against
individuals—the Lord Chancellor and Attorney-
and for that reason was not or-
printed. The Honourable Gentleman
hat it should be printed, intending to
consideration of it till the next Session,
an act of great injustice to the in-
conduct it impugaed. If the object
was to oppose the right of the Lord
Ireland to dismiss Justices without the
Court of Law, he would find that
, were against him. He would find that
Ponsonby, while in the office of Lord
ad not only justified but exercised that
,henever the Honourable Gentleman
" the question, he would be prepared
blame could attach to the Lord Chan-
- other person in the particular case

,AM said, that his time was occu.
the Election Committee, which pre-
looking into the details of this case.
• Honourable Friends, the Member

Member for Trinity College, was
delay. He did not intend, nor did
undertake to object to the right itself,
tscretion under which that right was ep
istance referred to. The Petition st
that Mr. O'Hanlan was removed
iustice of the Peace, because, as the
. admitted in conversation, he was
Catholic Claims. Mr. Ponsonby had
as an advocate of the right, but
the exercise of it upon a principle

, wished to know, with what view the
Gentleman desired that a Petition should
contained an attack upon two in-

AEI thought it should be printed

fG begged the House to consider un-
nstances the Petition was now pro-
been presented for three successive
affording to the persons against whom
opportunity of rebutting the alle-
, again presented two mouths ago,
manner the candour of which he could
, they were required tb print those
order that they might remain uncon-
a months more.
IMILLY defended the advocates of the
- the charge of a want of candour. He
the absence of his Honourable Friend
moved that it should be printed.
•ci, on the suggestion of the Chancel-
luer, though the motion was agreed
he order.
G contended that, however correct
ight be, the printing of the Petition
of candour.
R. stated, that if his recollection was
-- printing was withdrawn be-

ROMILLY insis-ed, that the motion was
the suggestion was made.
the printing of the ketition was

LORD STEWART.

seeing the Noble Lord (Castle.
place, wished to put a question to him,
not influenced by any hostility to-
tis Noble Relative, for whom he en.

° respect in his military capacity.—
iuestion in a spirit of candour, and as an
the House and the Country. The
he might be charged in this case
ire not to clash with the proceedings
Justice, but the notoriety given to these
proceedings in Court made it necessary
now be noticed. The Brother of

had stated, in an affidavit in the
itncery, upon a private suit with which
-.oncern, that he had 12,0001. a year in-
:ountry, as Ambassador to the Court
also that he had 10001. a year as
(chamber. What he wished to know
luring the absence of the Noble Lord
In, comprising a period of about

ie continued to receive the income
The next point he wished to notice
:onsistency of the two situations. The
-I Lord of the Bedchamber was neces-
'tdour of the Crown, and it was a
the emoluments of both should be
the di: charge of the duties was in-
should feel mnch gratified if the
give satisfactory answers to these

aiEAGII declared himself satisfied
Lble Gentleman was only influenced
tve in putting the questiGas he had
regretted at the came time, that he
zessa.ry to do so at an earlier period.
sous to the House, that, consistently
for !iis own character, his Noble Re-
have removed from the country
returned here on leave of absence,
'd by the circumstance which the
.leman had noticed. It was well
those public servants who held high
were often permitted to return
arrangement of their private affairs.—

. was customary to augment the sa-
:retary of Legation from the salary of
or, who was absent. This was done in
Noble Relation. With respect to the
the two offices, it was to be observed
-e where a Lord of the Bedchamber

an embassy abroad, was it deemed
he should retire from the personal
Sovereign.
'MAM said, he had abstained from
question before, because, he thought it
As to the office of Lord of the
it were requisite for the splendour

of the Crown, another person ought to be appointed
when one was sent abroad.
Lord CASTLERE.AGH remarked, that the case
had often occurred before in which that principle
was not acted on, the House would therefore judge
why it was now brought forward for the first time.
Mr. BROUGHAM observed, that the reason was
perfectly clear. He had not noticed it till now, be-
cause now for the first time it was admitted upon
affidavit in a Court of Justice.