Star.
London, England, 1820-11-21 00:00:00

•• • 1

LONDON.

---

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 1820.
THE FUND&
?NWT OF STOOKS THIS DAt AT ONZ OtLOCK
Bank Stock 219 %
S per Cent. Reduced 68% 3/8 Vs
S per Cent. Cons. 69% % 3/4
Si per Cent. 773/4 14-4 oer Cent. 86K
• per Cent. Navy 105% 4i
tong Annuities 173/4 13-16
India Bonds 265. 275. pro.
Exchequer Bills ss. Ss. pr.
Cons. for Acct. 69% 3/4.

The genuine history of the proceedings against the
QUEEN begins to transpire. The reason of the Ha-
noverians haring their hands so deep in the dirty
work, was from an intention to institute the prose-
cution in the immaculake Coerts of that' German
kingdom, and then to have brought the record Of
the conviction to this country; but the British Mi-
nistry were afraid that the Parliament would not
consent to degrade the KING and QUEEN upon any
certificates of a Hanoverian trial.

The really revolutionary Prints still continue their
brutal abuse of the Highest Female in the kingdom.
Hear how one of them (The New Times) speaks, in
allusion to the Letter written to Lotd LIVERPOOL by
command of her MAJESTY /
" The Qum is perfectly well accommodated at Brandas-
burgh House, and it can surely do her no harm to remain there,
at least till the meeting of Parliament for the dispatch of bu-
siness. When chit event happens, if the two Houses should
think her worthy to occupy a Royal Palace, they may possibly
address the l's:uic to that effect, and to such Address his Mk-
arm wilt no doliat pay the most gracious attention. We must
own, however, our private opinion is, that their Address will
convey to the Kuio the expression of very different sentitlients.
Means must and will be adopted to lay before OM Roue of
Commons the evidence taken in the Lords; and with that evi-
dence before them, it is beyond all conception that they should
treat her MaJarrr as a pure and spotless Quur!"

Another article in the same Paper, and on the same

subject, says :
" The controul over the Palaces, erected by the nation for
the convenience and dignity of our Royal Family, ft Wholly
vested by Parliament in the hands of the Sovereign, as the father
or representative of that family; and as his Dlsserry is answer-
able to the country for their preservation and distribution, I
conceive that he would be highly censurable had he permitted
any of those mansions to be the residence of a female, more no-
toriously degraded by her unjustifiable deportment. than by all
the prosecutions and verdicts which necessity may sanction, or
eluity pronounce."
" It is not to be thought far a moment," says this friend of
truth and justice, " that she be QPICIN) can ever again be
looked upon, or treated, as she might have been, if the Green
Bag had never been opened. The contents, which, by her in-
fatuated answer to the Commons, she was the cause of snaking
public, remain fur ever recorded against her on the Journals of
the House of Lords. Iler name is for ever coupled with that
of the low v;:gabond menial, whom she raised to wealth and to
nobility, and with whom she slept for five weeks under the
same tent ! This is conduct, which, consistently with Its duty to
the nation, Parliament cannot and will not pass over. For the
present, however, it will be prudent on all sides (assuredly ft
will he so on the part of the Quzz.v) to suffer angry feelings to
subside. Threats of severity on the one side, or of turbulence
on the other, would be better avoided: the time will come
when her Miami's pretensions may be urged with more de-
cency, and considered with more indulgence."
Again, this same vehicle of moral purity thus
speaks of the Queen's intended visit to St. Paul's :
" The scheme of a Thanksgiving in St. Paul's is really too
shocking to be contemplated with patience. What! Is it ex-
pected that any Minister of the Church should lend the authority
of his sacred function to so gross and daring an insult on the
House of Lords; as to offer up particular Thanks to Atmicrotr
Goo for the proceedings which have taken place on the 13111 sof
Pains and Penalties. Painful indeed was the necessity which
compelled a large majority of that august body to declare the
grievous charge against her 11sse.sry proved ; and to pretend to
extract, from this, matter of exultation and joy, is to substitute
for penitence and sorrow the shameless audacity of a front of
brass. The QueEN may certainly attend Divine Worship at St.
Paul's; but if she does, no alteration whatever can be made in
the public service of the day on that account. The officiating
Minister dares not even to pray for her by name in the Liturgy,
much less to insult Auction, Goo by any pretended Turin of
Thanksgiving I"
" The Cluscm may certainly' attend Divine Wor-
ship in St. Paul's." How condescending ! Is it not
very kind it the Nets Times to allow this ? But
might her 'Alan:slit go there if the Nem Times could
prevent it? We rather think that this would.be "too
shocking to be contemplated with patience" for a
single moment, by that virtuous guardian of public
morals.
We have heard much of the insidious labours of the
Dissenters, to draw away the Hocks from their legal
pastors; but never, in our days, and we have seen
more than falls to the lot of most men, did we ever
witness so deliberate a procedure carried on, to drive
every conscientious individual away from his Parish
Church, as the measure which was countenanced by
the Reverend Bench of Bishops to punish an Illus-
trious Individual, without even the form of a trial,
by excluding her name from the Liturgy. Talk,
. indeed, of the assaults of the Methodist:4" as certain
men choose to designate all who differ from them
on any point—talk of the assaults made by such
men to overturn the venerable fabric of the Church
of England,"—what are they compared with the
new torpedo which has been introduced by these
" Sons of Wisdom ?' Was it ever before known,
since the Church of England was established by law,
that Prayers were ordered by authority, of such a
nature as to make whole congregations simultaneously,
and by one impulse, quit the Church, and leave the