Star.
London, England, 1820-08-23 00:00:00

Wave you that certifizateiVith you? Yes, I have it; but it it
tot in the hand-writing of her loyal Highness; Schiavini wrote it•

Let the Interpreter translate it.

The Marquis of BUCKINGHAM *sold, this in regard to the
position of the corridor and the other rooms, it was by no means
satisfe:torily explained; and he suggested that it was necessary
their Lordships should be furnished with a plan of the rooms.
The IORD CHANCELLOR said, if the COunsel on both
silts possessed a correct plan of the rooms, it would be desi-
rable that they should furnish copies of it ; but there must not
be expressed, on the plans, how the Pcrpms were occupied ; they
must be simply Mertioned, one, two, &c.

The soxserroa-Gimmat..-1." lly Lords, I am prepared with
a plan, 1::t it is liable to the objection mentioned by his Lord-
s Lip ; but by to-morrow I stall be able to furnish it."
.71r. Baotou's said, he laboured under consideraEle disad-
v:unage and difficulty in this respect. That his Learned Friend
shoula be provided with a plan of the rootns, was extremely
probable; but they could not expect it from the Counsel
for her Majesty, who had been kept entirely ignorant of the
nature of the etidenco that might be brought against her.—
The pablishirg a plan of the rooms is liable to very serious ob.
jections ; for although the repots shall only be marked one, two,
Ste. yet there are few persons who will at once distinguish a
corridor from a dining-room, or a dining-room from a bed-
TOMO. The publication of the evidence every day supplies
snore information to an Englishman than the drawing of
any plans; but the difference is this, that every• man,
whether Ite understands a word of English or not, will un-
derstand a plan. Non nil recorC.ca vanished at once if that is to
b. the care, and if plans are to be published while other wit-
nesses remain to be examined.

Loan Cnaxcm.Loa.—No plan can be offered, unless each party
furnishes one, and that it is aszertabled to be correct. It will
be fir the Counsel themselves tb decide on its accuracy.
Some conversation took place between the Solicitor-General
and :1i r. lirLughain, respecting the character of the witness,
o hen it was admitted by the latter, that during the time 31a-
jocco was in the service of her Royal Highness, be believed he
was a good honest servant.

.Jr. kistwou,sw objected to the certificate of good character
1:-.irg received as evidence on other grounds; it was not written
by the Quin, bit only by Schiavini, of whom their Lordships
knew liotting. '
Sounroa-GeteratAL-.-He was Major Domo once.
Mr. flootronme.--WeU, and because a man is Major Dows,
srd chooses to give an unauthorised certificate to a felluw-servant
and a countryman of his own, is that to be received as evidence?
Souerroa-Gassa.si.—lt lu:s the seal of her Royal Highness.

P•lr. Bitot•ctWa.— Although it has the seal of her Royal High-
ness, there is no evidence of its havirg been given by the autho_
rice, qr with the consent of her Royal Highness.

SOLIZI:JR. GUZRAL to witness-..Da you remember Schiavini?

it situation did he hold in her Royal llighness's service?
—Th.:: of Equerry.
Had he tn. general management of the household ?—Non mi

tecardo !
Mr. liaccon.i!t o'djected to the witness's evidence, as to a
paper which c:Juld not be authenticated, and was inadmissible.
The LORD CHANCELLOR was in favour of the Soli-
citor-General.
The Sozattroa-Gcticitai..—Had Schiavini ever the general
management of the servants of the household ?—I do not know
who commanded them; sometimes Bergand commanded ; some-
times Siliavini commanded ; all commanded: It was impos-
sible for me to know who commanded them.
Souerroa-GENzitat..—:sly question was, who had the imme.
dine superinteudance of the servants of the household?
The Interpreter felt some difficulty in translating it; but on
its being put, klajooco gave his favourite answer. Questo non
rni rcao: do I

Soucteos-Gaannuismaid you apply to Schavini for that paper?
rit Bedveltant objected to the question ; and was supported
in his obj...ttion by the Lord Chancellor ; o n which the Solicitor
Genital declined asking the witness any further questions.
Loin CHANCELLOR.—If any Noble Lord wishes to ask any
questions of the witness, they are noW at liberty.
Lord Vatic wished to know, in the voyage that had been so
often alluded to, what sort of weather they had while on board ?
he question being put to the witness, he replied, " bon mi
Teeordo !"

Lord ELLENBOIOUGH to witness.—How was her Royal
Highness dressed when she passed through the cabinet to Ber-
gazni's room, when at Naples ?—Non raj recordo !
Earl GUEird—Conld you see her Royal Highness distinctly?

But &es not know how she was dressed?—No, I do not know
what dress she wore.
Were you in bed?—Yes.
hid her Royal Highness look at you ?—Yes.
Were you asleep at the time?—As I sleep now.
Cut did you pretend to be asleep ?—Yes, but so that one
could see a perscn.
Did her Royal Highness think you asleep ?—Yes.
Did you leave the service of General Pima duringithe blockade
of Mantua?—Yes.
1!"•:`e you dismissed from his service, or did you go of your
own zccord ?—I recollect to have asked my dismissal from the
.A.:;;:tant ; but he could not grant it until General Pino returned
Tram 11:ilan.
Did you remain in his service until the return of General

tiro?—res.
On his return, did he give you your dismissal?—Yes ; the
Adjutant came to me, and said, now you are at liberty to go.
Did you get a certificate from General rillo of your charae;
?—No; I did not ask it.
Where did you go when you left the service of General Pino ?
—To Milan.

What was your object in going togethir from )Clan to Vienna?
—To see whether I could get some place.
Ti, Q.,•xce now withdrew, at half-past twelve o'clock.
Lord DA R sILEY.—" The witness has stated that Lady
Caarlotte Campbell accompanied her Royal Highness from Na-
vies to Mean; Y wish to know whether Lady Charlotte Camp-
bell ever dined with her Royal Highness at the same table with
lingami?"—questo non ml recordo!
The Marquis of BUCKINGHAM.—Did he see Bergarni
snd the Princess together in the apartment in which the bath
was prepared did.
Did you see the Princess *hell Bersami took the two addis
tional pails of water from you ?—No ; she was with him, but I
did not see her.

The :Jhort-hand writer was now desired to read that part of
wi'a.rts's re-examination that related to the rooms which ad-

tht dining-room.
Was there another email loom adjoining the dining-room, be-
&Z.e. that is which the bath was prepared?—.Quests non rni

11!;.F>gclo!

17!lica the Princess and Bergarni went into tile small apart-
ao u h:re the bath was prepared, did you see the Countess
with :he Prioress ?—No.
Did you ace any of the female atter.dants of the rrir.cess with
Pr. at tiiat that ;—I did cot see attr•