Star.
London, England, 1827-12-01 00:00:00

•ti

.

.ZAWINtELLIGENCkr..4".
. • •
itO taLS FiZlii:l4lllW .01.:11.44 iif7l •
WARD %V Obiritt.i-.-jett Lib
this was 11.iaw of a ward of r bait obiltiieeiit
end a young itlan of the name of ifi.ut .acl enamor*
Mat 'Lige hasitalten plisie in Mee month of April
The young lady, who wa. still wider age, wn.ent,biled
under the will of bir father to a very consideratlfe.folti
tune. The defendant, it eras stated, was thescrai
butcher, and was possessed of no property f awilialFeb
other mesas otobtaisling I tieelibeadilMiladetrol ails
sisting his father in his• business of a besibrii '7141e
marr age had been Solemnised by banns, in Liodon, Mid
it was now wished that a proper settlement et the yang
lady's property might be made, •
Mr. Parrs, who appeared on behalf of the guardian
of the young lady, and the esecutor of her father's will,
stated, in answer •to is queation'of the M.'aster of the
Rolls, that his Clients didafot wish to dispute the validity
of the marriage, or to proceed vindictively against the
husband. .All that Was now desired Watt that a proper
settlement of the property might be made. • •
Mr. KNIGHT appeared ou the part of the "husband,
who. he said, was widths to sub•ait 'to any order that
.he Court might think proper trimalte. • •
The MASTER of
,the Rotts—Thert let there he a re-
ference to the Master to..ppeove of a proper settlement -
and let the husband undertake to execute such settle;
merit when prepared; otherwise hostile proceedings
must be instituted against him. -
COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nevares' 30. '
Sitines after Teri, before Lord Taaramorsa •
_ saint Iv, IFUSsIT. .•
The ATTORNEY GENERAL stated the ease, arida was
%caution fpriread supplied to a at
+Wandsworth, kept by the defendant, values lag
.which defendant denied her liability.
John Earl, brother, of plaintiff, proved that id Da,
amber; 1824, a female- came to his brdtber's shop. had
contracted for a supply of bread for rut establishellst
which she was to smuts at 15r Southvilfe, Wandswattlia
and she called -herself Mrs.tlussey. She paid several
accounts, according to agreement, at three awastbs•
credit ; but upon the plaintiff slenrandiog subalance of
'lli. and threatening to. arrest her Inv it, the defied him, ,
declaring that the bread was supplied-to Mrs. Wanda rib
Ate daughter, who was a married woman. •
r A copy of a circular was pot in, hom which it ap.
geared that the two Ladies were partners in the.scbools
GURNEY declined making any defeace, and a
Verdict, was givers for the plaintiff.
THE HON. MR. JERVIS V. THE N,N. G. mtant.t.c.,
• Mr. CHITTY stated this to be. a caw of compensation'
for dun age done to the painting of a furnished houses
Lord TesTaaoas asked if it could not be settled 'Mit
of Court—and what was the damage?
Mr. GVRRZY said about 154
Lord Tastraarrau .expressed his, surprise th t tarp
Gentlemen of rank should litigate so paltry a sum.
,The case was referred to a Gentleman of the Bay- ^
GRAY V. GUTHRIDGL—GRAY V EDvirARDS.
Yn these_ two case: the claim was fur rest tut idif ef,
money.paid to the first defendant, an auctiondi;lf
the purchase of an estate sold by auction, arbieb WAS.
alleged by him to have been paid over to the veldt*,
the second defendant.
ft appeared from the first examinations that theplaiaa . •
tiff discovered a defect' in th-ztitie, which caused bins,. •
to give notice to the auctioneer nil to pay away thn•
Money, to which it. was objEtterf 4hat the.mo.ley was
already. Paid. Upon thislast point,
Mr. COLLETT said, that the plaintiff' nnor ss.
staked.. Br the. decision of .the Court • nposs,two fonder's...
'crises (Edwards o, . anOthet);', '
cases in which the auctituter :paid. over. after .notletsi...
from the purchasers, the inference was clearly-eraabi:i
tithed' that payment bcfoie notice exonerated' the encl. -..
tioneer. ~ . •. •
•
Lord TENTERDEN said, that he perfectly CONCufli tk
ns. ' 1
with the decision. but Oct wish the inference tad to be,.
'esiabliited, and for which there settaihty did seem to
be some ground. in tke reporit. But. with I.:sipper:4m..
lettuce to the opinion of ti use Learned Judges, be eo4ll'
nct agree that the ioletence was so entirely allowabla'
A purchaser puts his money into the hands of an ant
tioneer on an implied certainty that there can be a good
title made out : only let it be considered what fraud -
and mischief might flow in, if any other consiructiaa
were allowed' The Learned Counsel must consent to
a verdict, but he had leave to move the Court to tater •
a nonsuitat the proper perind...
btr.*coLprrr hoped that his Lordship would oet-rilt
retire 'the auction ditties (being money p..id Into the
handiattlis'eliedt to be paid over to the Crowuj to bb
Melided in tbartdict-aiainst 'the aucuoneer.
• Lord TINTIRDEN said, that in the .end. it mutt* result
in the same consequence. Tte auctioneer bad induced
the plaintiff to advance Ihat. money, aus.welkaithe,ursi •
chase, upon a title, shifts, be ought to Live known to
be defective.
Verdict for the' plaintiff, subject to motion for settles • -•
aside the trial and entering a oonsuit.
COURT OF COM3ION PLEAS. Novauma
Sittings after Alkhaelmas Term, before Mr. Justice Paaa.aisk
• Conienon Juries. .
GOODMAN V. ILLNNELL.

Mr. Sergeant Musa stated that this was an action
to recover compensation for an injury which bad been
sustained by the plain iff, in consequence if the neglect
of the defendant's servant. The plaintiff •is a journey.
man carpenter. and on the 19th of July last was re.
turning from •his work at Walworth, along she West-
' minsteuroad, between Kennington-cross and the Mit-sh
Gate, %%hen crossing the road opposite to a pub:ic-house
called the Thiee Stags, the defendant's servant, who
was on a horse, and -ridihg at a most desperate pace,
ran against him with prodigious violence, al, as might
be readily imagined, knocked him down. .Bo•tral.per.
sons who witnessed the transaction called to hint to
stop; but he proceeded at a twitter r( e, and reist ft.;
every:oE9a to stop him, made towards Vauxhall with
the greatest rapidity. The attention of the perusal was
then directed towards Ole unfortunate plaintiff', wLom
they found tts be quite insensible, and to appenrance
dead. Having removed him fiom tte toad, they con.
veyed him to the house of a "neighbouring surgeon,
where every attention was paid to him, and the tit cosier y
applications having been made, he was conveyed home
in a ha. kney coach, and placed in bed, where he lc-
mained in a state of great pain for a very cOnsidetitbk.
time, and was, indeed, unable to resume hi; usual la.
bout for the space of about three months. It would
therefore be seen, that he had not only suffered front
the pain he endured,. bucalso &ons a aatylnyteiial loss
of time. It having been ascertaitt the person.
who had caused the accident .site girt sereant of tlie
defendant, it was hoped.that holyailjitlratse
.made in
adequate tomsrensatioli 'for thi-I`. )illilfiiimi i a Pii
an application was madam) him - - t. hut be
refused to make any Tenuous:4m% . . se-neither
the horse nOrs.se,tytaw. belcmge& 11P:.billtr. telt this ;fie
taAtc
Leal ned. S {grant understood was .to be sit.dp in elii.
'fence of thin action. ' He hoped, howistrititk his. liy-
lormaticts on that point. was :Suc...Arect, for be sisouUl
prove that the man was, at least ocelisill•lehretanfloyed

•

-