Star.
London, England, 1828-03-03 00:00:00

LAW IN FELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, MARCH
I.
FKATT AND BARKER.
Counsel were heard to conclude the argument in this appeal.
The LORD CDANCELLOR then pryceeded to give'
judgment: He recapitulated the main facts of the
case, which have been already staled, and said, that this
being the case of a voluntary settlement, it was the duty
as it was the practice of the Court to lock with the
greatest circumspection, and even with jealousy, at the
facts that had attended the transaction. The evidence
of Mr. Sperling, the attorney who had prepared the
deed, was extremely important in its bearing upon those
points which must chit fly influence the decision of the
Court. He proved, th it the person making that set
tlement, although a man advanced in years, was in the
full possession of his faculties ; that he (the attorney)
ha. explained to him the nature of the deed he was
about to execute that it was an absolute transfer of his
property, and not a disposition which he could after-
wards revoke, and that the settler being thus fully ap-
prised of its effect, executed the deed. So far the con-
duct of the attorney appeared not only to be blameless,
but he had done all that his professional duty required
of him. His evidence also cast some light upon the
conduct of Mr. Barker, one of the defendants, and a
person entitled to a moiety of the residue of the settler's
property. Mr. Barker, it appeared, had given the
attorney instructions to prepare the deed in the form
that Mr. Pratt had resolved upon ; but he told hint, at
the same time, that he was not authorised to say to
whom the residue was to be given, thus leaving it tot
Mr. Pratt to inform the attorney who was to take the
ultimate benefit of his property. This was also quite
right on the part of Mr. Bar ker, whose conduct seemed
to have been perfectly unexceptionable throughout the
whole affair. The deed was prepared by the solicitor
in blank, and it was by Mr. Pratt's personal direction
that -the nam:s of Mr. Barker and Mr. Osborne were
inserted in those blanks. Under these circumstances,
his Lordship saw no reason to doubt the validity of the
deed, and he therefore affirmed the decree below, and
dismissed the appeal with costs.
cox AND ELLIOTT.
His Lordship heard this appeal, which he also affirmed.
COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Guu.nuaLt., MARCH I.
Adjourned Sittings at Nisi Prius in London, after Hilary Term,
before Lord MITIRDZW and Common Juries.
OIDMALL V. HEAVISIDE.
This was an action by a mariner against the Captain
of the ship Thames (an East India trader), for an assault.
—The declaration stated, the defendant had caused the
plaintiff to be flogged, and afterwards put in irons and
imprisoned on board the ship, without reasonable cause.
The defendant pleaded the general issue, and a special
plea of justification, stating that the plaintiff had used]
violent and improper language on board the ship, and
conducted hiroself in a mutinous manner, and that the
punishment had been inflicted upon him in order to
preserve diccipline on board the said ship.
Mr. BROUGHHIE (with whom was Mr. Bussv) stated
the case very strongly against the Captain; but as a
part only of his statement was borne out by the evidence,
we shall confine ourselves to a detail of the facts as
given by the witnesses. The ship Thames, an East
Indiaman, of 1,4C0 tom, of which the defendant, Capt.
William Heaviside, was commander, left England for
Carlton in the early part of the year 1826. The crew
consisted of 140 pet sons. The Captain having, in
March, 1827, taken on beard a quantity of rattans for
his own private adventure, applied to the crew to part
with their hammocks in order to make room for thtm,
and to those who consented to do-so, he gave two
bottles of mum each. Amongst several of tke men, who
had got intoxicated with the ;um, a quarrel arose, and
t ee men, named Finnis, Barney, and Headburg, having
been found fighting together, the Capt. gave orders for
t tem to be flogged; accordingly the officers and the rest
of the ship's company assembled on the quarter deck in
the usual manner, to witness the punishment. Two
(keen lashes being ordered to be given to each of the,
men, they were inflicted by the boatswain's mate, bUt
when Headburg (a Swede) had received his two dozen,
the Captain expressed himself dissatisfied with the con-
duct of the mate, who, he said, bad been favouring
Headburg, because he was a countryman of his, and
immediately ordered him another citizen lashes, which
were given ; the Captain having swern that he would
punish the mate unless he infl cted them. The plaintiff
and another mariner. named Castles, were standing
near the Captain at the time. Castles having made
some gestures which gave offence to the Captain, the
latter said to him. " ll—n your b—d. what are you
looking at r collared him, and said, " I have got my
eye on some of you," and then, throwing Castles firm
him, gave hien a blow on the head with his sword. At
this time the whole of the ship's crew were assembled
on the quarter deck. The Captain said, "I had thought,
that this business was done with." The plaintiff replied,
" I thought so too." These words one of the witnesses
stated %ere not spoken rudely, but "rather in a friendly
way." In a minute or two after, the plaintiff said,
at HI had my will, there should be no flogging at
all." This was said in rather an under tone, as if not
meant for the Captain's ear. The Captain. however,
immediately ordered the plaintiff to go aside, saying,
" I'll speak to you by and by." After the flogging of
the three men, the Captain ordered him to come for-
ward, saying to the officers assembled, " You heard,
Gentlemen, what this man said; I shall now punish
him as a mutineer." The boatswain was then ordered
to flog him, and he was accordingly tied up in the usual
manner, and received four dozen lashes with the cat-
o'•nine tails. From the severity of them his back was
dreadfully lacerated, and continued so for some time.
He was then, by the Captain's orders, put into irons,
and placed in the poop, where he remained exposed the
whole of one night and the following day. He was after-
wards taken below into the steerage, and from thence
removed into a small narrow dal k passage near the
quarter-gallery. He remained in solitary confinement
nine or ten days in the whole, during which time he
was kept in irons, and no surgeon was allowed to attend
bim ; and during five days of his imprisonment he was
kept upon bread and water. It was stated by Mr.
Brougham in his opening speech, and attempted to be
proved by the witnesses, that the plaintiff had incurred
the resentment of the Captain because he had refused
to part with his hammock, and that the Captain's sub-
sequent conduct towards him arose from that circuun
stance. The evidence, how-ever, did not support the
statement. It was proved that the plaiotiff was in gee
neral a quiet inoffensive man, and always attentive to
his duty; but it came out in cross-examination, that
be had once been flogged on board a man of war for
inebriety.
One of the witnesses, in cross-examination by Sir
JAMES SCAALIITT, stated, that before the flogging took
place, th ore had been a good deal of talkuag. below
about tbi severity of the ship; and that the plaisiffhad
said tp the crew, they could talk below, but were afraid
to 06 so when they came upon deck. It was also proved,
dust while the Rigging was going 00, or immediately
After, the plaintiff, addressing the crew, said, u There's

not a man amongst you:" and, "if every man was of
my mind, there should be no punishment on board."—,
Only out witness, however, swore to the latter expres-
sion ; and Castles (the man whom the Captain struck
with his sword) state', that he had told the defendant's
attorney that such an expression had been used, but
that this statement WAS untrue. • It was attempted to
be shown, in the cross-examination of the witnesses, that
the plaintiff had used a goad deal of insulting language
to the Captain, and that upon his being de,ited to strip,
he took off his shirt and threw it at the Captain's feet;
but neatly all the questions of this scut were answered
in the negative. It was stated, however, that, after the
flogging, the plaintiff told the Captain he might Bog
him again if tie liktd, as it was not the first flogging

found
thougl

it evek
he del
that p'
again
ever,
receiv
and hi
jury,
offerei
Mr.
house

vancei
made
patch

he hadhad.
Sr JA MRS SCARLET with whom were Mr. F. Poi.
Lf ck and Mr. GUMMING), for the defendant, at first
proposed to call witnesses in support of the defendant's
plea of justification, but having, after an elaborate re•
view of, and able comments upon, the evidence given
for the plaintiff, conceived that he had satisfied the
Jury that the facts, as stated in the plea, had been made
out by the plaintiff's own witnesses, he eventually de
alined to call any witnesses on the part of the defen
dant. Ile admitted the proposition of his Learned
Friend (Mr. 1:1,-ougharn) that a Captain of a ship had no
right to inflict punishment upon any of his crew be-
yond what was absolutely necessary to prevent mutiny
and preserve discipline; and that if he committed any
excess of punishment, he was liable to an action for
damages. Mx what were the facts of this case? Had
it not teen clearly shown by the plaintiff's own wit-
*lmes, that the plaintiff had been guilty of mutinous
conduct, and had therefore justly rendered himself
amenable to that punishment which had been inflicted
npon him? Three men, it appe lied, had been sen-
tenced to punishment for riotous and discord, r 1) conduct
on board she ship. It had been -said that they had been
made drunk by the Cartain with the turn he had given I
them; as it the Captain would have risked not only the
loss of a cargo of 200 0001. value, but h-s own life
and the lives of no less than 140 pet sons under his case.
Was it likely that he should have dcine this? Was it
probable that be should first have made the men chunk,
and then have punished them for fighting? What was'
the meaning of his expression, " I thought all this had
been done with?" Did it, as the yitnesses had su •
g
gested, refer to the punishment ''Which was then just
about to be inflicted, or did it refer to some prior trans.'
actions that had taken place on board the ship? Could
the Jury suppose that it had reference to any thing else
than to former disorderly conduct on the part of some
of the crew ? The Ciptain had felt it to be his imperinisl
duty to make an example ail these men. He had in vain
endeavoured by remonstrance and,entreaty to repress
the disorders of which they had been guilty ; and it
therefore became absolutely necessary that he should
administer a public example. Unless he had done so,
he would have been guilty of a dereliction of his
duty, .and would have subjected himself to the
coas.-quences of a mutiny taking place. What does
he do then? He orders the punishment, and assem-
bles the whole of the ship's company on the
quarter deck to witness it. While they are so assem-
bled, the plaintiff endeavours to excite the crew to that
mutinous conduct which it was the Captain's object to
repress. He uses the most inflammatory, the most se-
ditious language. He says, " There is not a min amongst
you ; and if I had my mind, no flogging should take
place r This is addressed to tie whole of the crew,
and could the Jury conceive anything more calcutaied
to excite them to acts of violence and outrage? Was
"this such c. nduct as the Captain could, consistently
with his duty, have allowed to pass unpunished ? In
causing the plaintiff to be punished under those circum-
stances, he had done no mote than he was bound to do,
in order to repress that mutinous spirit which had,
arisen, and which, if it had extended to the whole of
the crew, might have been productive of the most cala-
mitous results.
Lord I'ENTERDEN recapitulated the principal fatal,
to the Jury. The only question for them to deter.
mine was, whether the plaintiff had or had not con.
ducted himself in such a manner as to justify the
punishment inflicted on him? It was, undoubtedly,
the duty of a Commander of a ship, wherever he
saw the least tendency to mutiny,instantly to take means
to repress it, and for that purpose he was justified in
inflicting whatever F unishment might be necessary upon
the individual who..e conduct was likely to create dan-
ger. The safety of the ship, and the lives of the whole
crew depended upon the courage and fit mness of the
Captain, and upon obedience to his eiders being en-
forced. It was the duty of the clew to support him in
the exercise of his authority; and unless he inflicted
wanton and unnecessary punishment upon any of them,
be was not amenable to the law. The plaintiff had
certainly used mot improper language, and such as
was highly calculated to inflame the minds of the crew
while they were assembled on the quarter deck; and it
the Jury were of opinion that the Captain had reasona-
ble cause to suppose that his object was to prevent the
punishment of the three men from being carried into
effect, aid to excite the rest of the crew to mutiny and
disobedience of the Captain's orders, they ought to find
for the defendant ; but if, on the contrary, they thought
that the plaintiff had not so misconducted himself as to
justify the punishment inflicted upon him, then they
would give a verdict for him, with such damages as
they thought him entitled to.
Tire Jury, after retiring for a short time, found a
verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, 501.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, GUILDUALL, Marren 1.
gluing, after Hilary Term, before Mr. Justice BUSROUGH, and a
Common Jury.
KENTON V. SINTON. _ _

_
Re t.
and MI
several
fendar
wrath
MI
ant, 1
nothii
he m,

Ve
At
fixed

On
brougi
nn nisi
sea Bai
at Sw.
priionei
format"

search:
of the
18^8,
These
was rn:
The
I can

innocei
not ticti
front r

and net
The
The
not te

ThL
The

The
your

The
Ir ',Mat
Priseni
The'
The
them.

The
ley ?-

The
belor
shot
then
Ser
tool
dres
sub,
own,
of '

peci
C:

cei,
the

Mr. STEERS opened the pleadings. In this case Mary
Ann Hill Benton was the plaintiff, and Elijah Wiseman
Benton was the defendant. The declarat•on stated that
the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff for money
lent. The defendant pleaded that he was not liable,
and thereupon issue was joined.
Mr. Sergeant JONES stated, that the plaintiff and de. '
fendant in this action were sister and brother, and that
the former was compelled to b ing the present acti .n to
recover a sum of 601. which she had auvanced by way
of loan to the latter. In the month of Api il, 1826, the
defendant, who resided at a place called Vauge, in Es-
sex, and of which be had been overseer, came to the
plaintiff, who was at that time living with her brother-in•
law in town, and after having stated that he had
fallen into arrear with the parish, accounts, and that
he was also in fear of an arrest from a banking-house
at Billericay, to which he had become indebted, he
applied to the plaintiff for a loan of sixty pounds,
with which he said he should be able to make good
his payments. The plaintiff replied, that she had
not the money by her at the time; but that she
would send it in a few days, by the Horndon coach :
which she did accordingly. On another occasion, the
defendant had applied to the plaintiff for 1001. which
she had the precaution net to advance without the se-
curity of a promissory note; and it was indeed loran-
nate that she bad done so; for when the defendant

a
fi:

►etu
nr

t.
A,
w•

Sri,
sion

mii
.. ,
. -
3 that his shier had no security for the 60L and OLD BAILEY SFASIONS.
ght that she might find a difficulty in proving that •
-•-•enie......
The Sessions basing terminated, Friday morning the Itssessess
er came to his hands, as it had been sent by coach,
peoescenedteendc :GOT azathenvt,ena:se
auspirodn *utheonV3sarioninves pirlHeoans ars:
inn
etermined not to pay it ; and when applied to for -- r
purpose, he told the plaintiff she might get it Eleanor Bryant and MaryP
1314, Andrew Powell, and Georg;
nif she knew how. The Learned Sergeant, how- Wyatt. for stealing from the person; John Jones, Charles Weit.
would now call witnesses, who would prove the bury, James Wicks, Samuel Wien, Henry Godfrey, Joseph I.
t of the money by the defendant beyond all doubt, fevrei Henry Fmndmvvan,i
lie William Mitchell. George Mitchell,
is
he should then confidently await the verdict of the 1 m Johns, alias Jones, for liouse-breaUee . .
maul; la'racaenreyarWilliam Forbes, for stealing in a dweßing Wiwi
,as he was convinced no good defence could be Francis Arthur Anderson, on his own confession, for the Ste of: 1 NumBER 12,802 3 •
.ed, much less established. fence; Edward Barry, and Thomas Johnston, for horse-strafirsgi .' •
r. John Richard Platt, thefirother-in-law, at whose Alex; Ephraim Shorter,
JShohorot elsirleablioiasi Rohde
jrtobShosrtevisdemfor uttering
i forged
e the plaintiff was living when the money was ad notes
;be Transportedw
fur Life—Jane and
Einirt, for stealing, for
from * t6NTKACTS FOE SUPPLYING PRO
ed, stated that he was present when the defendant person • John Piston, for stealing oats to the value of 7s. Wilhae, . JNG, LINEN, COALS, CANDLES
ARTICLES, FOR CONVICTS ON B
e the application, and that he had afterwards dis- Steer, for a violent assault and stealing two hats; William Howard,
hed the 601. by the coach. alias Josiah or Joshua Bell, for a violent assault with intent to rah , London, F
William Malley.
ebecca-Rosetta Platt, Martha-Amelia, Henrietta, For Founeen Years—Ann Brown, Thomas Button Fenton, Gee; UCH Persons as ate desirous of
Matilda Benton, the sisters of the patties, proved Smith, Eliza al.cris, Charles Itootsey, Cash. Ragan, James Greesi •.. the Superintendent of Convicts to as
ral conversations, in which they had heard the tie- John Bunn, ?dary Aun Hales, alias Miles.
hForo,SezcYa earsweNtblabr,ey Knivoarone,eJohneoWerrightool!obrtGHeea; I eese, Barley, Oatmeal, Salt, Beer, Coals,
ant say that be owed the plaintiff 601. but that he . °aching, Necessaries, Blankets, Woollen C
Id never pay her, as she had nothing to show for U. Owens, John mJnnes, Thomas Smith, John. Clancy, Williewl 4 Litsen and Cotton, Wrapper Cloth, Shoes, an
Ir. Sergeant TADDY, who appeared for the defend• Blackman, John Gregory, Edward Hill, John Scott, John Bet: -rl Convicts on board Hulks at Porta:non
having cross-examined the witnesses, said he had rows, Henry Isaacs, alias Henry Adlard, James Campbell, lamed
Bates John Alexander, David Digby, * *rich, Sheerness, and Chatham, may receiv
in gto offer in contradiction of their testimony, and •
SlWuirlicerss, DWaniiiiejlaipennis, 'John Hackett, ?V ho.* DitrekenY,J aria;
' Contracts on applyingto the Superintendent
rust therefore submit to a verdict against his client. Pictoanm, Henry Miller, Mary Witney, 3azwter -Stanton,l
Thernai
e diet for the plaintiff—Damages, (101. Cadbury, Joseph Waite, William Smith, Thomas Driscoll, Soo-en 7..._, Lambeth Terrace, an en board the severe
Joseph aitheir Tenders at the Commissariat Office,
t the rising of the Coutt, the adjqui nment day was cir:mths. James Pascoe, Maria Jones, Stephen Cotter Willie* ected to the Superintendent
1 for Tuesday, the 15 h of April. Stone, James Suthmier, Elizabeth Starbuelt, Thomas King. Joke up a
thereon leT and directed
to furnish Supplies for Co
Osborne, Richard Clarke, John Palliser, David Noble, Charles ender
--,------
Littlejohn, William Griffith, Joseph Charles, James Smith, Ellen brill/DAT, the 18th of March, but none or'
POLICE INTELLIGENCE. Cockling, John Foot, Eliza Harrison, Charles Jobbing, Sunset Twelve b'Clock on that day ; nor will any
Racks, George Chapman. James Bean, William Cardmen, Wes. oaten tiettle'on, or annexed to, a printed P
MANSION-HOUSE. Ridley, Robert Smith, Henry Jones, Charles Willie, John Atkin.
1 Saturday a man named 164- Thornfey, alias Bill Moly was son, James Mason, James Blyth, Charles Bayle, Robert Barry, inserted in Words at length; nor unless signs
;ht before the Loan Mayoa,and he underwent an examination and forty others. • - known Property etigagieg to become bound
'spicier] of having been concerned ir, the robbery of the Swan- Thomas Riorden, convicted of bigamy, was not eentencel *dog, In the Sem.expressed in the Particu
lank. Mr. T. It. Jones attended as solicitor for the bankers Jonathan Reynolds, convicted of the like offence, to be impri. fans-stet of the Contract.
vansta ; Mr. Gates attended from the London bankers. The .soncd in the House of Correction and kept to hard :abeam fur 111
ner had been apprehended in the coarse of the day upon is - months.
at ion received from Swansea, where he is well known. On The judgment of William Jones, tried for the murder of Mo. . • COSTOMaII
ping him, three bank notes were found,one (tar 501. No .5,817, Jeffs, and who pleaded guilty to a charge of stealing a coat, we FOR SALE BY AUCTI
to 24th January, 1828 ; one 101. No. 5,824, 26th of January, respited until next Session. ,' . By °Mere( the Hon. Commissioners of his
; and another for lig. No. 15,970, of the Ist of Feb. me. In the whole there were 240 prisoners sentenced, some to bt -4 At the Custom House at this
le notes were handed to the Lord alayor, and whilst Mr. Gates imprisoned for various terms, and a great number to be whippea 1
,os w
NDNISPLY, 12th day of March, 1828,
making some private communication to him respecting them, it, and out of the gaol. 2 the Morning precisely,
Ise prisoner—Oh, you may examine them as lung as you please. . . ..
a bring forward the person that gave them to me. lam an IRACULOUS ESCAPlL—Thursd.iy last the son oft TH E UNDERMENTION
M
cent man; I can bring forward undeniable characters that I've
soldier,
stationed on the heights of Dover, fell over the 4. • IN SUNDRY LOTS, vi
been out of town for weeks and weeks; and you, Mr. Solicitor,l,79B Yards White Cotton Fringe, for
l Swansea, I know you ; why don't you take the right people, CI if ; all feared he would have been dashed to atoms; :AK; Curtains, &c.
net give them trouble what's got nothing to du with it? fortunately, however, s'me projecting bushes caught •r -.
1397 yards Silk 19 pair
he Loan MATOK—But pray tell us where you got these notes? him, which broke his fall, and wonderful to rehrte, not. s less yards Silk Ribbon ' 14 Cant
he prisoner (in great anger)-1•11 give you no iliformation ; I'll
withstanding the height he fell, when picked up and ` 14! yards Blond Lace 13 Don
besides take the trouble to do it ; rye a hundred notes bets those. . 39 Silk Handkerchiefs Col
he Chief Clerk—Where do you keep your cash? brought to the top of the shaft, he bounded off to regain i
he Prisoner—At my own banker's. his companions with the agility of a hare. The child so.l S
4 ytairktisSeTh Scarfs
9 S
Thread Lace 4 Pelerirgi
Ir. Gates—Where is that? was between five and six years old. 5 yards 'Cambric 66 pies
be Prisoner—No matter for that ; I can tell you that if I had - 8a dozen Harp Strings con
r notes, that neither you nor the bankers would ever see them MEETINGS OF CREDITORS, BASIN GHALLATHIEXT.
1115 Muskat Snuff Boxes 22 pair
129 bolt
n and I don't care about saying so before the public. M...
.• eIS Itialshee,d3tSe.tonto for Watch 14 pair
be LORD MATOR—I find your name is now given in by you H. Chaplin, Deptford, Kent, zolcow.
relliam Thornley." Have you not gone by the name of Broad? H. Hewitt, Crotched-friars, merchant :-. ::: :7 35
1109 5 lb. Bugle Beads 155 plain
Cisoner—Yes. A. Definer, Judd-street, Brunswick-square, apothecary ... 3lt . 1 Clock Movement 566 Colo
be Loan bleyoa—And also of Thomas Thornley ? J. Cooke, Liverpool, dealer ... 510 - 9 ib. Chocolate . 18 lb.
'be Prisoner—Yes, they are all my names ; I was christened by W. Kadwell, Krum, Kent, bricklayer' ...: "... -.. 510 41ti. Human Hair About 6d
n. T. Freer, High-street, Shoreditch, cheesemonger ......5 10 434-pair Leather Weirs neg
'be Loo Marisa—What, all! Thomas William Broad Thorn- W. Nokes, Southend, Kent, miller .... • 3 11 Together with sundry Articles of Jeweller
!—The prisoner replied in the affirmative,—He was remanded. P. Milne and Co. New yank-street, Commercial-road, met. 3 1 ' lets, Clasps, Buckles, Necklaces, Rings, &c.
G. Packwood, High-street, Southwark, shoe-manufacturer 3 IC , A Deposit of .C 25 per cent. will
LENT ASSIZES. T. Wills, Tring, Hens, innkeeper •. :.- The Goods may be viewed the Two Ds
W. Sherwood and Co. Paternoster-row, booksellers .. 2 •10
OXFO CIRCCIT—READING, Fan. 29. E. A Walking, Bath, draper awl eststegues had during Office Hours, Is.
R D
..• seemed to Purchasers.
The Commission was opened here this day a little C. J. Carter, Dean-street, 01%rd-tercet, builder .....2 10
J. Dibden Bayham-street, Camden-town, victualler ... 210 . _
ore two o'clock, by Mr. Baron VAUGHAN, who was E. i FLOWERS.
Mayo, Craven buildings, Drury-lane woollen draper .. 1 I
ntly after joined by Mr. Justice PARK. The Court T. J. R
-ear, Sloane-street, Chelsea. chrilist ..
... ... I It This day was published,
on adjourned to four o'clock. After attending avioe
W.
Odell, Holland.
atßheortihneer-hstitrbeeet,:in*bwirdtikpeens
tome
keeper
- ... 1 11 A new Edition, in Imo. with coloured
tvice, Mr. Baton VAUGHAN, at the hour appointed,... lis '
A. CONCISE and PRACTICAL
ik his seat in the Cross n Court, and proceeded to ad- DH.
TPealnieri Heiegdh-pstreleet,oVirteltel, pet, cedoedunale. ker .... •11 :01
the Growth and CULTURE of t
ss the Grand Jury. Several trifling causes were E. Coorrpye'r, Spread
Russell-street,Ag-ca haberdasherrees 1.. ... IJO PINIC, AU'RICULA. POLYANTHUS,
hstquently disposed of. The calendar contains the DMDINDS. TULIP, HYACINTH, ROSE, and oche
W. Brydon and Co. Combat, druggists 1 - a Dissertation on Soils and Manures, and C
Ines of fiity-three prisoners; but with the exception
eßicbomond.Surrey,_tailor ...... ::: ..... 1-1
two or three cases, the offences are not mat ked with _I.!. Gasct7ne_,_ ''t esteemed Varieties of each Flower.
By THOMAS HOG
collar features of atrocity. ual
Hawkins, 110aiddi Berkshire,
ltdon.road draPer'''
•.. " 10
• '"
A. shopkeeper --- ••• ..- IS • . Printed for Geo. B. Whittaker, As
CROWN SIDE, MARCH I.—Before Mr. Baron VAUGHAN. J. Baker and Co. Nicholas-lane, wine merchants .. .. 11
William Brown, Joha Ivey, and William Straightens, W. W. Prosser and Co. Fenchurch-street, wine merchants .. 11 - THE INQUISITIO
!re indicted for burglatiously breaking and entering T. Lawford and Co. Bevis Marks, say factors
J. Harrop, Grasscroft, Yorkshire, clothier
e house of Thomas Burrower, of Abingdon, and price 15s.
IL - li:. ill .
.. Thh day was published, a new Edition, in o
Wing thereout 301 b. of beef, 301 b. of veal, 12 pigeons, INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT. THE HISTOnY of the INQUISI
•
The Matters of the PISTITIONS and Scrianuers of the Panorsits
4 a carving knife.
Mr. Burrowes having detailed the particulars of the hereinafter-named
trloambeed(the same having been filed
in the Court) are LLORENTE (formerly Svc
Translatedo and abridged from the NV
heard at the Court House, in Portugal-street,
Si of the prof city in question, proved finding the appointed
Inn-fields, on MONDAY, the 10th of March, at Tea - disoN)T,OcoNmlpased from the Original Document
the Supreme Council, and the subordinate T
Tying knife concea!ed in a hay rick. He went to in the Forenoon.
Ann Barton, late of Grub-street, grinder and leather cutter Painted for Geo. B. Whittaker, Av
arch there in consequence of evident e he had re-
shopkeeper, ',4 Alio, lately published in Svo. with Twenty
Thomas Case, late of Macclesfield-street, City-road,
ived from Frederick Ploughman, an accomplice of.' of 11l • ra, Cuss, and Religious Cerem
and labourer in the London Docks
e prisoners. William Foster, late of Great St. James's-street, Lisson-groye, , •'VSKETCHES of PORTUGUESE LIP
Frederick Plougham then proved that on the night grocer and cheesenionger
question he met the prisoners in Abingdon. Brown Johnsa
rwHairl(lisuireed, as John Hair) late of Fleet-street, Birmingham, :'1 .
..
id Ivry first went down into the cellar of the prosecmdraper INDIGESTION, GALVA NI
Raombeurtel
bLiaenr:imlaeute of Suffolk-street, Peatonville,udtonr green grocerl
r, after thawing the sty lea and brought up part ofThis day was published, Second Ed'
le meat. They then desiied him and Stiaighton to go and assistant to a warehouseman. a genera. dealer,
awn and see what they could find, which they accord- Robert M•Knight, formerly of the following streets In the City of ,
redid.
orer :CdAsdet
14r;viSc:f EAf
NI
t:NShsptel3lo4:tfmoaEn:t
slaG:Tecgswt
L:UNi .
tic,:
icrn:::EaL
innistash:wcpeLahlorsii:Tml
igly chd, and brought up the pigeons, knife, andothe vi?eiventry, viz—Hertford. Migh, and St. Nielhdolais, draper
Williliaamm MlN:liseeYt; (Hsuaecdknwey, draper and g
!mail:der of the meat. They afterwards went to the ith John Engley) late of Southgate-strett,
ay tick and divided the spoil. Gloucester, fishmonger and Abdontinai Viscera;
On t t oss-exarnination by Mr. CARRINGTON, he said Robert Potts, late of Ratcliffe Cross, master mariner By M. LA BAUME.
e rever had any of thc spoil ; be WAS not the worst of John Shipman, late of Fludyer-street, Westminster, solicitor
ANlaettheaondieelrSsmioeitho:jaariharate-na-sttrertete: SoWmaeltwaoTr
thow no,uotutfobf
tibusinessete Bloomsbury and Northern Dispensaries,
London Electrical Dispensary, Gratuit
se patty, though other people might think he was, nor
ad he proposed that robbery, though he had others.— John Todd, late of LongP Melford, near Sudbury, Suoffolak,acarpentet
le should have taken his share of the meat, but did not and builder
hllaantneiostfeur
pCpeoorperseyWatoortsui.(tsturLdt.bßuy tetbsounsecamuere oef,
blealkaenrn.ister. Woos) Also, by the same Auth
ke to take it home. Observations and Facts on the Chymica
cy of eilalyanistn in the Cure of
The deputy gaoler of Abingdon gaol was then called,
rOhealiff-MpeallettDefiiAlv.eß Y. ;* Practical illustrations; also, Remarks on s
nil confirmed the testimony of the last witness as far
TTrusottoy.--Bsununri:Htssßaat: n• dies; with Three Plates. Price is.
s related to Brown, by relating a confession of Brown. -4.
ur. Poblished.by Highly, Fleet-street, and N
The Learned JUDGE said, that as that could not affect WZDNISDAT—Tear celebrated-Pltm Dr. Samuel Parr, LL.D. 411 and may be had of Souter, St. Paul's Cb
be other two prisoners, be thought the evidence of such died, aged 79.
Tnuasner—The elegant and classical Anna Letitia Barbanli , B_And-.trees; reef; and all Booksellers.
witness as Ploughman was not sufficient without con• diet, aged 82p. GOSS'S WORKS.
irmation.
ydeyortfarthage, who suffered
Mr. SHEPHERD said that had been his feeling all along. martarrgm—atatrhPeetaugae ofa
2N2,ainblethLae Hosninersi vagina nostra sapit.
The Jury then acquitted Straighton and Ivey, and • Our page relates to man.—Me
BIRTH. Just published, price ss. in boards,
cm ned a verdict of guilty against Brown.—Sentence At the Admiralty, Mrs. Keith Douglas, of a daughter.
MARRIED. 1. rirHE /EGIS of LIFE; a Non.
tot pronounced.
1. airy am the indiscretions arising fr
William Straighton was again indicted for breaking At St. Alkmund's, Derby, the Rev. Charles Hesketh, RA. of ' which the Causes, Synaptonts, and belief
rod entering the house of William Cl ild on the 26th of Trinity College, Cambridge, and of Rossall Hall, in the county d scree, Gonorrhoea, Stricture, Seminal Wea
ivtember last, and stealing two handkerchiefs, two Lancaster, to Anna Maria Alice, only daughter of R. Saunders, Esq. veloped ; Part IL anthraces Practical
Debility, Self-Abuse, and Mental •Irritatior
tan of shoes, and an umbrella. DIED. ` Observations on Vesetabk and Animal •
Mr. CARRINGTON conducted the prosecution, and At Brighton, the Rev. E. Northey, of Woodeote, near Epsom,
Series of Cases illustrative of the preced
:ailed Elizabeth Child, the wife of the prosecutor, whothem in a familiar manner.—By GOSS an
andAtCala.uadlatsawf Windsor.
theßev Thomas Hodges, Rector of New Radnor,
pore d that on her return home she found the window and of Aston, Herefordshire. geon,London.
-
aura open, and the articles in question gone. Rev. T. Williamson, brother of the late Sir Hedworth William- Nature beatis
Wm. Hussey, the constable, who took the prisoner son, Bart. of Whitburn Hall, Durham, and Rector of Stoke Dame Plirlihtls rue kiln si spits
bussescognovert
nto custody, produced the property found upon him, eel,
Aitr. the
eceouudneut y, o
Kent, Devon.
in Since lle.s.vax to all the fund of
his 74th year, the Rev. John Ha tton, of
which was identified by the prosecutor, his wile, and Rolvenden' and of Houghton-le-Spring, Durham. 2. UM ' Its frugal application marks the wise.
HANA . a Non-Medical Analysis o
laugi,ter. Rev. J. Rogers, Rector of Feniton, Devon. dental to Females, in which are offered
The Jur found the risoner Guilt Sentence not At the Vicarage House, Barrow, near Barton, Lincolnshire, 01
aa does on tbe peculiar debilities attending th
y p y.— Rev. Edward Henry Hesleden, M.A. Vicar of that parish,
pathits, and fors The subject of Ste
pronounced. formerly Fellow of Magdalen College, Oxford.
Mr. CURWOOD applied to the Court to permit At Over Worton, the Rev. Walter Ida er M.A. of Pembroke spots. Intertstipg mad important cans illu
land,
A At
Minister Edinburgh,bot
Hem y Turner, one of the gang, to go before the Grand College, Oxford, and Curate of the above place.
Quo fugit yaws? lieu! quove color
Jury to give evidence. The learned Counsel observed, Whither flies Love? Ah! whsswthe
that the committing Magistrate, with a view to insureNorthonth Letatithh,aldt.eetrbley
re rested.
Walter Fogo Ire-
The thole may be had of Sherwood, Gil
the conviction of the offenders, had taken the depositions dealer,
in
tbeartl6l, on the 9th ult. Mr. Alexander Anderson,picture
seemester-row ; C,chapple,s9,ll4ll-mall; S.
th year of his age. Callow and Wilson 16,•Princes-street, co
of Turner on oath as a witness; he, Mr. Garwood, be. 6 ________—..--1
...—...... Robe; T. and G. Underwood, 52, Plygt-s
lieved that Turner was the most notorious offender. MAILS—THIS DAY. 374, Fleet-street; Onwhyn, 1, . Catkerine.
Mr. Baron VAUGHAN said, that it was a question en- MIN. DM ARR. DNS. Reuben mei Stevenson, Burks and Kin
Dublin
tirely for the consideration of the Learned Counsel. waterfurd 20 1 France 1 0 Dpek, Ipewich ; 'Sutton, Bory St. Earn
As the depositions had been taken, perhaps the better2 0 Hamburg 0 1 street; lkistol ; Narrate and • puifielcf, •11
Gueruse, and Jersey t o Flanders 1 0 Todd, Briggafe, Leeds ; Wrightson, B
way would be to allow him to go before the Grand Jury. Lisbon o 1 I Sweden 0 1 Ratter; Wolstinholme, York; Gore, Li
True bills were subsequently found against eight of Donaghadee • 0 0 I Leeward Islands 0 0 cheater; hisPlorn, 155, Tiongate, gibs
the poachers—for shouting at the keeper with intent to Buenos Ayres 0 1 I Brazil 0 1 Edinburgh; Porter, 72, Graft, strect,D
Holland o 1 1 Jamaica 0 0 sellerse-iPrice 55.)
kill, for highway robbery, and for poaching. -
-- Hltik I- W A 3. EX( at LONDON-BIM/6 K 1 0 MOIL Mita. Messrs. Goss and Co. are tote consults:
Owing to the continued illness ut Justice BEST, Mr. Morning . 0 minutes alter 4 their houn ; am' Patients in the country a,
• . •
Sergeant ONSLOW has been appointed to the Cornelis
sion on the I-time Circuit, and will be Mr. Justice Bun Afternoon . 17 minutes after 4
which tan be forwarded to aoy.ert of the
.i. . . oGott,eslLoysandhietn.cacsept, clinic. laAotan. gours,misa retnittsantico.e I
NOVGII'S coadjutor on the occasion. . . Lus.Doasli
trzicrrsui
zaterd
ia,nrdmi'su,b:N:slived. 1
,byriJcko‘tatistl'ailawcatriTr.tinthre:tp.ropitarteta