Star.
London, England, 1818-07-29 00:00:00

jCP
lk •

.LAW INTELLIGJF*E. Yr

COURT Or CWANCERY, JULY
,C 7.
Thee LORD CIIANPELLOR came into Court shortly
before eleven o'clock this day, and proceeded tcr hear
Counsel in a cause arising out of a case in bankruptcy.
It did not elicit any feature in she least interesting to
general reader.
JULY 28._-GEE V. PRITCHARD AND ANDERSON.
Thifcase occupied the attention of the Lo RD C mor-
en.Lon from a little aftnv ten until three o'clock. It
was a motion made by Mr. HART, on the behalf of
the defendants, the km Mr. Pritchard and Mr.
Anderson, bookseller, in Piccadilly, to dissolve an
injunction which had been obtained by the plaintiff,
Mrs. Gee, the wife of the testator, whose natural son
the defendant Pritchard was, restraining them from
publishing a certain work, entitled, " The Adopted
Son, or Twenty Years at Biddingtcn, containing
Memoirs of a Clergyman, interspersed with other in-
teresting Correspondence."
Mr. WETHERELL and Mr. Itottria.t. were heard in
support of the injunction.
His Lonosni P finally confirmed the injunction.

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, JULY 27. -
LADY EMILY VANE TEMPEST.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL in this case prayed his
Honour to appoint a Manager of the estate, and
effects of Lady Emily Vane Tempest, in the event of
an Appeal against the decree of the Lord Chancellor
being brought before the House of Lords. Sir Sa-
muel Romilly and Mr. Hart, he observed, wese alto
in the cause ; but he did not anticipate any objection
to his motion on their parts, it being for the benefit
of all the parties, particularly that of the infant.
The VICE•CIIANCELLOR was of opinion, that the
best course to follow would be to ler. the cause stand.
over for a few days, as the Gentlemen concerned is
it were at present occupied in arguing the cases of
their respective clients in other important causes.
The SoLtetrox-GENERAL, in answer to a quession'
put by his Honour, said, he had no objection to this
arrangement.
JULY 29.--LADY E. TEMPEST D. ORD.
This was an application, by petition, on the part
of the Countess of Antrim, for an order of the Court
to direct a more regular payment of Lady Frances
Vane Tempest's allowance during her minority. She
complained that tl receiver of the colliery estates
had not regularly paid that allowance which was
charged upon them by the testator, and that it was,
in consequence, difficult for her to keep up that esta-
blishment which was suitable to the rank of her
daughter.
The VICF.-CIIANCELLOR made an order to the ef-
fect sought for ; arid, as it appeared, that the receiver
to the colliery estates had been in advance, his Ho•
nour further ordered that he should be reimbursed in
whateier.sems he advanced, by the receiver to the
land estates.

PRACTICE OF TILE COURT.
His Honour, the VICE-CHANCELLOR, adverting to
the many applications made to the Court to hear
motions after the seal had close particularly to one
made by Mr. Mitford, which his Honour, strirtly ad-
hering to the rule he had laid down, refused, said—
That he had been so tormented .rich motions after
the seal had closed, that he I.;:id conic to the deter-
mination not to hear any motion after the seal had
ended. It was the duty of the practitioners of the
Curt to attend at the proper time (which they were
aware of), and make those applications ; and if they
would not conform to the rule thus laid down, let
the injury fall on themselves, and not on their clients.
Mr. MITFORD was extremely sorry that the motion
he now wished to make had not been heard during
the 'seal.
The VICE-CuAscetton wished to be informed,
whether the neglect arose on the part of Mr. Mitford
or on that of his clients ?
Mr. MITFORD was at a loss how to answer.
The Vice CHANCELLOR said, let neglect meet its
doe reward, and let me be no more thus troubled
with this sort of applications, for I will never in fu-
ture-hear any motion after the seal has closed.