Star.
London, England, 1820-08-23 00:00:00

Did any one at Milan give you money P—Mi recordo non !

This the interpreter translated at first " I do not remember,"
and " I remember not," or " I remember that nobody gave me
money." 4fter some conversation amongst the Peers, the lat-
ter construction was generally agreed upon to be the meaning of
the witness.

Now long did you remain at Milan at that time ?—Preeisely,
Nonni record° ! but I thinb..lB or 20 days.

And when you returned to Vienna, did not yourself pay for
the carriage that carried you there ?—Non au record° !

Who gave you money at Vienna before you set out ?—Colan-1
Brown gave me money to go to Vienna.
Who gave yon money at Vienna to go to Milan ?—My fatL•r
paid for my journey. Non mi record° !
Who gave yon money before you set out from Vienna ?
The Souctroa-Gm aaat. objected to this question. Tie
Learned Counsel for the Queen was presuming that the witrec.
had positively received money.
Mr. BaouoitAin.—l certainly do,
The question was repeated.
My father paid for my journey. I remember nobody tail'
me money.

After you got to Milan, did any one give you money ?--Na.
body gave me money when d arrived at Milan.
While you remained at Milan did nobody give you money •
(with great emphadis).

Here witness answered with the words—Non Nei record,.
and mi recordo won—more no than yes, and I don't know.
A I'eer requested that the witness should be applied to hint-
self to give a decisive definition of his meaning.

After some conversadon, it was decided, that an explanatio:
should be sought upon the re-examination. Mr. BuntonAm in,.
plored the Mow to keep in view their expressed determinati,
to act. upon the principle of the Courts below, with regard t )
evidence.

The Socterroa-Gmasc then proceeded to a re-exasninati,,,
of the witness.

Did your father conduct you from Vie,nna to Milan for th,
purpose of giving evidence against the Queen ?
Mr. Baououasz.—l object to that asp leading question.

The Souctroa-GssEam. then changed his course of eras:lira-
Were you at Milan examined as to the conduct of the
Princess of Wales ?—Yes.

Had you any other business at Milan?.—No.
Where did you go after your examination was done at Milzn 1

.10 Vienna.

When at Milan, before you .set off to return to Vienna, do you
recollect having received money or nut?—Before my setting ot t
for Vienna Yes,

For what purpose did you receive the money?--To travel, to

make a journey.
Did you receive any money before you received it for t6..1
purpose?—,Von nti recordo!
What do you mean by non mi recordo? —I mean I
it not it my head to receive money when I say 'non mi r--
cordo.' II I received money I wottld say yes, but Ido not re-
collect the contrary.

After some observations from their Lordships upon
meaning—
The LOB p.CIIANCELLOR said, the House expected tl:A!
if the Interpreter (Mr. Cohen) at any time thought the trans-
lation of the hlarchese Spineto locorrect, notice should be in,-
mediately taken of it.
The Souctrca-Graxam.--You said, that after your examiaa•
don at Milan, you returned to Vienna. Who sent you to th:i
country ?—Colonel Brown. Ile sent me to Vienna.

Wbo sent you from Vienna to London ?—This, I cannot say,
for a person came to-fetch me, and tell me to come from Vienna
to London.

Did that person come with you ?—This person brought rre
to London.

After yon arrived at London, did you gn to Holland ?--Yet,
I set out for Holland.

Did you remain In Holland with the other -witnesses ?
gr. BROUGHAM (interrupting the Sollettor-(feral)--1 re-
examination should embrace nothing but what rose out of the.

He interrupted merely for the sake of re-

sularity—(Order, order).
The Soucrron-Gosaaax said that Mr. aroughaut bad croo.
examined for the purpose of taidng inference to the prejudLe
of the witness.

Here the Queue entered. Their Lordships rose as usual.
Iler Majesty took her seat next to her Counsel.
The SoLtmoft.Gxxxitaa said, be was entitled to fill up all the
circumstances connected with the examination of Milan up to the.
arrival of the witness in London, with a view of preventing A
false construction from being placed upon the evidence.
Mr. BROUGMAN trusted the House would allow him to reply.
The LORD CHANCELLOR.—" You have a right to
reply."

Mr. BROUGHAM. ..••1' Yes, but I trust that your Ip rdships will
adhere to the rules of the Lower Courts judicially, and that I
shall not be interrupted by a shew of approbation or slisappro-
bation." Ile then contended that the Solicitor• General had no
right to question the witness upon the subject of the particulars
of the travels of the'veitness, except as to those places to which
the cross-examination referred,
The Loan Coaxcrupa, aftor having consulted with the
Judges, said, it was his opinion, and that of the other Judicial
Authorities, that the examination should be proceeded in.
With whom did you come here ?—1 do not know.
Did you come with all the witnesses ?—No, only with some
of them.

Did you land at the same place with the other pesos
Have they all remained at the same place?—Yes.
Have you come from that place to give evidence hers ?—Yes.

Have you all dined at the same table ?---Yes.
Whether op board the Polacca, where the tent was raised,
were Alademo4selle Dumont Qr Diadem;belle Brunet don't
know,

Was Madame Dumont on board ?—Yes.
Was the Countess of Qldi there?--Yes.
Were there sleeping places on deck ?
Mr. Ilaouonas objected to the question, and it was withdrawn
Was Madame Brunet on board during the voyage?—Yea.
Where her Majesty was at Villa d'Este, was there any door!.
communicating with the corridor except one ?—.Yes.
Was there only one door?—Only one door.
When that door was shut, was there any other door com-
municating with the room of Bergami?
The Interpreter said, he feared he could not make him um
derstand it ; but the question was repeated, and be answered,
that when the door was shut, so far as he can recollect, that
there was a passage from Berganti's room to that alter lio)..1
Highness.

When her Royal Highness was at Naples, were there not two
doors from the room where you slept communicating with the
cabinet?—Yes, in the cabinet there was 4 door leading to the
room of Berganti.

Was there not another door in Berganti's room ?—Thcre was.
Where did that door open into ?—lt communicated with the
dining-room of the Princess.
Did it communicate with it direct?—There was a corridor
hetweten. There was first a 411 ring-room, then a small corridor,
and then Bergami's room.

Wu that the room in which her Royal Highness usi:alif
dined 7—Ea.

How lonf did the witness remain in tie service of her Royal
Highness ?..r—Threc

Were you dismissed, or did you go of your own accord
asked once for my dismissal at Rome, and twice at PesaL
and then Bergand granted it,
Did you receive a cerificate of your good conduct ?—Yes.

I

itmil