Star.
London, England, 1827-04-20 00:00:00

Lately, at St. James's, CaMpLARLIVIIIII=I* Wisellll°9 Bar. 11°111
e Dave%
Navy, to Eliza, eldest daughter of the late Bev. Georg
B,D. Rector of Crazheid, Bedfordshire.

been in pursuit of other game--that had been poaching'
on another manor than Mr. Clinton's; and feeling em-
barrassed at being asked such an awkward question.
and that by Mr. Gates too, he gave an evasive, con,
fined answer, in order to turn Mr. Gates off the scent?
Might not this convenient husband have been used by
the defendant as over-jealous husbands were treated by
gallants in the old comedies, namely, turned into ridi-
cule, and made the instruments of their own delusion
and dishonour? But is to the evidence. it did not
contain one single proof of an illicit connection between
the defendant and the plaintiff's wife. Why was not
Mrs. Gates called. who could give such decisive evidence
on the point? And why was Mr. Gates called, who
could state no one act of impropriety? But further—
lind it been proved that the defendant and Mrs. Clinton
were in the habit of seeing each other sinceber sepaa-
tion from her husband? No; and surely if she had
been connected with him (the defendant) before, she
would, now that she was deserted by her husband, have
kept up the illicit intercourse since that separation; for
it was notorious when women lost their virtue, they inva-
riably lost their prudence also.. The moment they
admitted the contamination of guilt, their modesty
and their caution quitted them together, and left them
open to detection and punishment. But what was the
real object of this action? Why this—to bar a suit for
maintenance, which the wife had instituted against him ;
and. perhaps, another suit, for the restitution of conjugal
rights. But, in the object of the latter suit, she could.
not but fail, (namely, the restitution of her conjugal
rights) even though sbe won the suit, and though her
husband was compelled to return to her—for, though
oqe man could lead a horse to the water, twenty men
could not force him to drink of it--(Laughter). But it
the plaintiff could, by obtaining a verdict in the present
action, defeat his wile's suit for maintenance, then be
would be able to throw her into destitution for ever, and
live the remainder of his life with Miss Betsey May—
(A laugh.) Juries had lately gone too far with their
verdicts in these cases, even where the facts of criminal
intercourse were clearly proved ; but, in the present case,
in which no one act of guilt, or even impropriety, had
appeared in evidence. lie was sure the Jury would give
their verdict in favour of the defendant.
Chief Justice Bur briefly addressed the Jury on the
law and the evidence of the case. Panties ocular proof
of the criminal act was not necessary to was rant a ver-
dict for the plaintiff. if be could prove the existence
of opportunities, and such a train of minor circum-
stances—such as dalliance—as would inferentially
lead to proof—then a general tendency and inclina-
tion to illicit intercourse between the parties—that
would be sufficient. In the present case, there was
not one scintilla of evidence to prove improper lanai.
ities, much less the act of guilt. The whole charge
rested on a loose story told by a man who allowed his wife
to reside under the same roof with persons whom he sus-
pected to be criminally connected. The absence of Mrs.
Gates, too,from this tr ial,was a very remarkable circum-
stance, and very unfavourable to the.plaintiff's case.—
If every thing had been right and honest in her ac-
quaintance with the parties, she, doubtlessly, would
have come forward with her testimony, which would
have settled the question at once. The plaintiff should
have produced Miss Betsy May also; but he cltd not,
and the Jury ought to conclude why he did sot. It
was their duty to consider whether, on such evidence
as they had heard, these was such proof as could
enable them to pi onounce, that an illicit connection had
taken place between the parties? but even if they could
decide that it had, they should then estimate what
amount of compensition in damages that man de-
served, who, having turned out his wife to poverty, on
the ground of the impropriety of her conduct. straight.
way threw him.elf into the arms of an abandoned
wo an.
The Jury, without the least hesitation, found a ver-
dict for the defendant.

ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE.
TAUNTON, Ann. Is.
Mersa iroork was capitally convicted of stealing
several sheep, the property of a farmer residing near
Bridgewater. The evidence was very clear against the
prisoner ; but on the Jury returning a verdict of Guihy,
the prosecutor begged leave to recommend the pri-
soner to mercy, on accoont of his youth.
The Jonce—That is no ground, Sir, for recommend-
ing a man to mercy, who appears to have been making
a living of stealing the sheep of the farmers throughout
the county. You have no right to make such a recom-
mendation to the Judge•—it is very unprincipled. You
bring the man here and prosecute him, and then throw
the-odium of the punishment upon me, when the whole
country is crying out upon the frequency of this offence
of sheep stealing. Your recommendation cannot be
attended to, fur do not know but that I 'alight to make
an example of this man. I shall turn it over in my
mind, and when the other sheep stealers come up foe
judgment, I will decide what to do with this man.

GLOUCEBTRR.
MUIR v. zozarate.
Mr. TAUNTON stated that this was an action for a
malicious prosecution, which arose out of certain dis-
turbances that occurred some time since in the cloth-
manufacturing district of the county of Gloucester. It
was probably in the recollection of the Jury, that in the
year 1825 some very serious differences- existed between
the w and their employers, and that in the riots
which occurred in the course of those differences sm.
ral persons were ducked by the rioters. One of those
who was unfortunate enbugh to be ducked, was the'
present defendant, but with that ducking the plaintiff
had nothing to do. However, the defendant thought
proper to ch srge the plaintiff with being active in the
outrage, and the plamiiff was in consequence cons.,
'flitted for want of bail. However, on his obtaining
bail he was released. The defendant, however, did not
allow the case to drop there, for he prosecuted the
plaintiff at the Sessions, where he was acquitted. For
this prosecution, so maliciously carried on against him,
the plaintiff now sought a compensation.
Henry Burgh, Esq. said—l am a Magistrate of
Gloucestershire. In the year 1825 there were riots and
disturbances among the clothing men. The defendant
came before me on the sth of August to lay a com-
plaint against the plaintiff.—(The deposition of the de-
fendant taken before Mr. Burgh was read.) It slated
that he was seized by a number of persons, who tine,
him into a pond, and that when he attempted to get
out, the plaintiff pushed bins back, and that afterwards
the mob pulled him out, and led him through the
itreets of Stroud.
• Cross-examined by Mt. C. PHILLIPS —The mob
'consisted of nearly seven thousand persons. The plaintiff I
was much injured.
Mr. Windley said-1 am ti,e Governor of the Bride.
well at Horsley. The plaintiff was in. my custody from
the Bth.of July, whente was bailed.
The Deputy Clerk of the Peace proved that the plain.
tiff had been indicted at the Sessions for assaulting the
defendant, and was acquitted.
John Smith said—l know the plaintiff—he is a
weaver. The defendant is a shoemaker. 1 remember
the defendant's telling me be would never have anything'
to do with Peyler if he had not sent ' him a lawyer s
letter, but now he would be d—d if he would not haird.l
him in a prison before the week was out.
Cross-examined—l atn a weaver. I will swear that
the plaintiff did not quit the neighbourhood just after
the defendant was ducked. I know he did r.ot leave
home, because he rents a loom of me.
Benjamin Bas foot said-1 was present when Cul.trm,
the defendant, was ducked. I was at first about fifty
yards off, but I afterwards got close to the pond. j saw
Colston in the water. He said to some one on the bank,
Reuben, help me out. The man addte.sed took his
hand and drew him to the side, and then pushed him in
'risen - - nearly six fees hi t;

MIDDLESEX SESSIONS, Aran IS. again. This Reui was a man , ty sia. . ;si,
PARISH APPRENTICES. and big in proportion, aNd had the appearance of 11'
George Dyer, and Sophia, his wife, tambour workers, navigator. The plaintiff is a small, pale lookiag man,
residing in the Hackney-road, were indicted for ill. and is a weaver. 1 did not see that the plaintiff was at
treating, and not sufficiently teeding, a girl named Ca- the ducking.
therine Wilson, aged twelve years, a parish apprentice. ' Cross-examined—l did not know who pushed the
defendant into the water.
The prosecution was at the instance of the Overseers of
St. Leonard's, Shoreditch. It appeared that the defend- Mr. Wells, an attorney, stated that be was concerned
ants were poor people, and had ten children, and they for the defence of the plaintiff on the charge of ducking
the delendant. The amount of the eel:eases were up-
ibok Catherine Wilson as an apprentice in May last.
wards of twenty guilieas. ,
She was toed well the month she was on trial, but after-
M. C. PHILLIPS, for the defendant, said that the Jury.
ward i she was put on a straw bed, and had no sheets or
blanFets to cover her, and had no other covering than would have to say on their oaths, whe.her the defendant
an old coat of her master's. She was in blooming health prosecuted the plaintiff in malice? Now so far from that,
when she went to the defendants ;and in February last, he was in a condition to shew that there was more than
plaintiff
cause for the charge. They had heard that the
on her return to the Workhouse, she was so emscia ed
plaintiff was made very ill by the treatment he had
and altered in her appearance, that the Overseers did
received, that they bad beard that a band of seven
not recognise her. Her hands and feet were covered
thousand persons were assembled together for the pur-
widt tsores, and chilblains, and she was incapable of
pose ot outrage. Two witnesses were
called, who said
walking. She complained of being kept short of food,
that they did not see the plaintiff assist in the ducking
and of cruel treatment. but the plaintiff's Counsel did not dare ask the witness
Mr. PRENDERGAST called witnesses to support the Smith. of whom be
rented a loom, whether he was at
charge, and Mr. PHILLIPS addressed the Jury for the work at his loom on the day of the riot ? It was never
defence. It appeared, that the girl had been charged alleged that the plaintiff was the same person who was
by her mistress with laziness and dirtiness, and that called Reuben, and not even one for a moment thought
she was treated the same as the defendants own drat he was; but had the plaintiff adduced the slightest
children. The Jury, without hearing the witnesses for
evidence that he was not in the crowd, and assisting in
the defence, returned a verdict of—Net Guilty. - the act of putting the defendant into the water ? A
STAGE COACHES. great deal of stress had been laid on the fact of the de.
J. Ilstektnager, the proprietor of one niche Bayswater fendant having said he would not have prosecuted if
end l'addington coaches, and G. Hornby, an occasional the plaintiff had not sent him a lawyer's letter. Now
driver, were indicted for assaulting Samuel Pyall, a the fact was this, the defendant intended to be lenient
constable of the parish of St. Mary-la-bonne. to the plaintiff, and it was only on being dared to it
Mr. Palmas's was Counsel for the prosecution, and that the defendant had commenced a prosecution. He
Mr. Anotenua for the defence. would now tell them what part the plaintiff really took
It was proved by Pyall, that he was employed as in the ducking. His witnesses would prove that this
street-keeper in the New Road, by the proprietors at plaintiff was in the mob, and actually said, while aid-1
the " regular" Paddington coaches, to prevent breaches ing them, that be would fight up to his knees in blood.,
of the peace being committed by the coachmen and The defendant, it might be said, was a shoemaker, and
" cads of the " irregular" coaches; who have a long the mob had therefore no animosity against him ; but,
time been complained of for their violence towards pas. he apprehended the plaintiff himself had, for it would
se.ngers, they having in some instances been dragged be shewn that he inquired for him at a public-house,
from one coach to another. On the day in question, a and gave him over to the fury of the mob, who ducked
Gentleman was getting into one of the regular coaches, him ; and, after he had indulged in the brutal triumph
when the defendant Hornby took hold of him, and of his more brutal feelings, this respectable plaintiff
dragged him to the coach of the other defendant. decked himself out with blue ribands, and p traded the
• Py4ll interfered, and remonstrated with him upon the streets of the town of Stroud; and, in addition to all
gross impropriety of his conduct, when he thrust his fist this, he should prove that, seeing an old and infirm
in his face ; and the defendant Buckmaster leaped from man, the plaintiff said that be deserved to fie served the
the coach, and seized Pyall by the collar of his coat. same as they bad served the rascal Colston. Now, after
. Pyall, on cross•examinatiou by Mr. Amman', said, all this, was it to be endured, that the plaintiff should
that the coach proprietors belonging to the " Society" not only escape from the justice of the country, but ask
paid him SOs. a week. for damages ho a man he had attacked, and who did
Geo. Mars and Gee. Smith, two drivers of " re- but just escape with his life?
gniar" coaches, confirmed Pyall's evidence as to the . Thomas Mort said—l live at Eastington ;lam a
assault. weaver ; I remember the disturbances, and recollect
Thehry•found the defendants Guilty, and the Qum- the time when Colston was ducked. The plaintiff came
UkY fined Mr. Buckmaster 101. and Hornby 6s. fkl. to thy house,*and aftet that he went on to Strand. A.

iploogh ha oestoed to soodado • that the u►aLformation of the
had Irises train some mishap that had befallen the tail of the
rent during ►er gravidity, whki conelusion went far to eatabftth
the relationship set fords on the part of the mil►ttiao,
One more witness came forward who Was sore the dog helonvd
to the milkman; and two, who were as certain it was Mr. Porter's,
The Alderman decided In favour of the latter, obwriins then
had been a great deal of hard sweetie' no one side or the other
and he had discredited the milkman's Witnesses on account of
attempt that bad been made to impose a dog upon him as the ,
litter with the disputed one, when it *as obviously doable the
clay from the look of the teeth.
The breeder remarked that some children est their teeth earner
than others, and so it was wit► drag& He could prodeee
lah
witnessed to shew that the old•looking dog and the young oars,
of the same litter. _

•
Tenon named Knowles told the plaintiff be had better
be quiet, and the plaintiff said be would fight up to
his kares m. blood rather than stay beck. •I *as much
alarmed.
Cross.ezamined—l was ill and attended by two doc-
tars, because I belonged to two clubs.—(The witness was
a most singular man, who spoke with all the studied
action of an orator, and added, that ballad told what
was right, and that he would abide by it to the day of
his death. After concluding this observation, which
was given with a pathos that convulsed the Court aids
laughter, he retired.)
John Chapman said—l am a weaver. T was at Stroud
on the day in question. 1 saw a mob of 6,000 or 7.000
persons. I saw the defendant on the road in a wet state,
and a great many persons round Dim. Mr. Burgh.
the Magistrate, was leading him. I saw the plaintiff
in the crowd.
Esther Bushel said—l live at Eastington. I saw the
rioting and saw the plaintiff going home. He wore
blue ribands on his hat. Old Mr. Knowles stood in his
garden, and the plaintiff exclaimed, " There is old
Knowles, he wants serving as ire have served Colston."
Crosoezamined—l have been married 25 years, but
I have been separated from my husband for near twenty
years. I sever lived with the defendant. 1 worked at
'his house before f was married, when I 'was quite a
little girl. I now live with my mother, and have lived
with her ever since I parted from my husband. f saw
my husband last about siz months ago. I have not
spoken to him for some years, as he lives with another
woman, and has siz children. • •
Re-ezamined-1 parted from my husband because
he was a spendthrift and was lazy.
Hannah Colston said-1 am the daughter of the de-
fendant. I was at Stroud on the day in question. 1
saw the plaintiff. He went into she shop of Mi. Hard-
wick to buy blue ribands. He said he would be "true
blue for the tight." 1 was close to him.
Mr. TaunTo2l replied.
Mr. Sergeant Bosismaurr summed up the evidence,
and left it to the Jury to say whether tire defendant. was
actuated by malice in the charge he made against the
plaintiff Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 251.

Mr. however, etpresied himself rowed
fresm Aldermanmeritience before
ehim, that the dog was Mr. Foftees.
A poor Irish woman was yesterday brought before Mr. Aldeft
man Amu', charged with creating $ &Urbana at die ot
of St. Sepulchre.
The Streetkeeper stated, that be hoed het selling kit at
berms ei Holholm-hett oPPeNee Fleet-markethe hsd
Or to sea* ibe persisted in remaining there, &mil
intioneepenor Milt hie basket to the Green-yard. Upon this
applied ealhoikeeiwiroviso mid her that be could do nothinz
.Ire a. Übe lbw became very abusive, and the Overseer was obliged
-end for the &reetkeeper, and gave her into melody.
• Mr. Alderman Amur—So you take away bet basket, and
it ibe only Rica:mot earning a living, and then when the applies
relief you send her here.
Streetkeeper—lkit her language was very abusive, your Worship,
)jr. Alderman Atrium—So it might have been ; bet 100
driven her re despair by depriving het of her only metes of
eistence. You should have brought her here kat, and not
lor basket to the. Green-yard.
gireetkeeper—Pleaae your Werth* she bit one of our oaten
in the arm, when the was brought before Sk P. laVaitOl Shan t:-
ago, and then she promised not to Wind mpia.
Mr. Alderman Amuse—And bad yes inn driven her to &vat
by taking away bet basket, she would not hale sbaug
Ovens's.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.

The peer woman stated that she had bought a peck of nets,
sow her 4s. and that she had sold shout one shillirg s emtik,
the Streetkeeper took away her basket. -
Mr. Alderman Austre—And when she applies at the v„
yard for het basket, sbe will find every net gone. It is trafba.
that she is to kme three shillings' worth of nuts, and have is pay
we shilling and sizpeoce for Green-yard dam You are discharged.
and I will give you a summons against the parish, for if t
choose to deprive poor people of their means of subsistence,
they become paupers, they must take the consequences.
HATTON-GARDEN.
A mason, in Peter's.lane, was charged by the Surveyor of l'a.
meat with caking away rwo fistartones from the pavement opposite
his house, and substituting others of inferior quality. Defendant
stared, that in erecting a "scallibld to repair the trust or his premises,
he accidentally broke the scones intimation, bat had replaced t'
late made the footway as good as before ; if the quality of the i
was inferior, be was ÜbCOOGCIOIIII of it, and willing to make a.
alterations required ; Indeed, he bad proposed this to the Surseysi
before coming into the °elec.—Ordered to make good died--
within fobs days, or he fined M.
- MARX-LA-BORNE.
George Burgess, a :mney lad, who had been entrusted
master to bring a load of hay to town for sale, complained I
bad been defrauded in the following manner:—As he was 1
along Limo-grove, a man asked him if his hay was sold? I
him it was nor, and the man agreed to give al. Se. for It, ad.._
it to be taken to the stable of a coach proprietor in the neighbour.
hood. After this was done, when the applicant asked '
money, he was told that it had been paid to a Mr. Grace, s
claimed it, and given a receipt. Applicant knew nothing of Me
mad insisted on having his hay back,but was persuaded to go at
at a public-house, which he did for shout four hours; but
came to him, and concluding be bad got into the bands
tilers, he applied to the Magistrates. Mr. GRIFFITIIIII
summonses against two individuals.—ln the evening the
proprietor and the man who pretended to bay the bay,
brought up in caitody. The former produced the receipt of
third perms, of whom the coachman pretended he bad mark
purchase : it bore a mark in the place of a signature.
Mr. Gaarrrroas endeavoured to alarm the defendants, by
ening to commit them unless the farmer's boy was paid ;
coachman was qoite careless about it—be wanted to go to i
be had fairly bought and paid for the hay, and was not '
pay twice, ate. They were ordered to find bail, and the '
bitterly at the Idea of going home without the cash.
TOWN-HALL
Ante Mario Cie was committed tor one month's bud
She was tried at the last Southwark Sessions, 'for stealing
pounds of bacon, but in consideration of her ate, and having at
gone nine Weeks' imprsonment, was sentenced to only seven ,
further confinement. The very day on which the was liberated,
repaired to the house of the prosecutor, and after loading him s
abuse, broke three panes of glass. Foe his prank she was committed
for seven days to Brixton Mill, whence she returned yesterd,
morning, and again assailed the shopkeeper, but was prevented t
breaking any windows, and was discharged, on her promise .
to offend more • but scarcely was her back turned urn the ob.
than she sallied to. the Whits Hind, St. Thomas s Broads:al
abused the landlady; and broke a square of slam, and being unabk I
pay the damage,waitrundied down again to her country lodgings.
UNION.HALL.
The wife of a respectable man named Brooks was brought ;
the office, charged with killing her infant, and afterwards att,
big bee own life. They yesterday, came to reside in Dean'
Inge, Lock's-fields, and, white in bed with the child, committed.
dreadful act ; and, on an officer being sent for, she drew thelikcif
instrument across her own neck. The body of the infant ha
conveyed to Newingtoo Workhouse, and the mother to St.
man's Hospital, to await the result of the Corseer's Inquest.
Irreaaxtvuoz.—Yesterday as a Mr. Joss/
tering the Talbot Inn, in the Borough, he met ,
man, whom he had known from his cradle, and.
him into the coffee-room to take some refreshment
being out of employ), and for this act of kindness
~ungrateful fellow contrived to walk off with 1
'swats apd one close- one, in which his benefi
travelliti-fronnhe country, an hour before.
Wednesday morning the premises of Mr. CESAi
haberdasher, of Wbitecross-street, was entered
' window, and robbed of paintings and other
able property to a considerable amount.
At about 12 o'clock on Tuesday night, a remarkab's
preservation of the life of a fellow-creature occurr
the Canal which closes the Stoke Newington
beyond the Shoreditch workhouse. A poor
beaver, whose name is Hewitt, on his way home,
attracted to the edge of the Canal, near the Bridge,
the loud barking of a dog which accompanied him
going to the spot he discovered a man struggliogi
water, and to all appearance oa the point of sinking.
instantly, though with some difficulty, drew OUI
intic
person, who stated himself to be a pauper belonging to
the workhouse of Shoreditch parish, and who, havist
become intoxicated, and being subject to fits, had 01'
consciously got into the perilous situation from which
he was thus providentially rescued. He was then takes
home safely to the workhouse, where be was immo
diately received, and treated with proper attention.

M A NSION-HOUSE.
Mr. Careless was summoned upon an information laid by Zahn
Edmonds, who charged him with having purchased a pheasaut of
Dim (the said John Edmonds), contrary to Act of Parliament,
The Loan MATOR--I suppose he pleads guilty' '
Mr. Nobler, jun. who attended for the prosecution'-I appre-
hend that he intends to do so, my Lord.
The defendant—l do plead guilty, my Lord; but I hope that
you will make the penalty as small as possible.
Mr. Mohler said, that the penalty was XS, without mitigation.
The Loma Mayon—So it appears that Mr. Edmonds receives
absolution by thia--(A laugh). Well, lam only to administer the
laws as I find them. I don't presume to blame any persons kir
taking such steps to secure themselves. At the same time I must
say that this law is quite an anomaly.
The penalty of £5 was then paid to the Chief Clerk, who ins-
nwsliately handed one half of it to Mr. Edmonds, whom loss was
thus reduced one-half.
A How-street patrol, was brought before ilse Loan Maros,
charged with having exceeded his duty in a Ant offensive manner.
A lad of gond character, it was stated in evidence, was going
along in the neighbourhood of Mt atling-street, with a bag contain-
ing chaff en his shoulder. The patrol, apou seeing bins, went up
and asked him what he had in his bag ? but as the person did not
appear to the lad to be authorized to make such inquiry, the an-
swer returned was not quite so satisfactory as the dignity of. Use
interrogator required. Indignant at not having met with a sub-
missive explanation, the patrol seized the boy, shoved him into a
shop, said that be knew him to he a bad character, and insisted
upon knowing the consents of the bag. Some persons who ob-
served the cotwAuct of the defendant, who was evidently intoxi-
cated, expostulated with him, and asked him by what atitkorky he
treated the lad with such indignity? lie immediately *mew down
his staff, and said, " Ey that !" This important piplestage then
shoved some people about, and acted with the greatest iD•OlleCe.
it, therefore, became necessary to stop him fa his car&r) and he
was brought to 711111/VIC roe his behaviour to the Chiefg Magtatrate.
The LORD Maros asked whether the defendant was a Bow-
street °Meer ?—An answer was given in the affirmative.
His Lordship asked the patrol what he had to say fur himself?
" Why," said he, with his arms folded, " I wgs going down
Watling-street, and saw this boy with a bag. He looked like a bad
one I have seen at Islington and I took him for the same and
asked him what was in the bag? s What's that to your said he.
do I took him into the :hop to see whether my suspicions were
correct." The defendant added, that the language he bad been
sub
_jetted to was such as to cause hint to retaliate.
The Loan MATOR,-Let the City Solicitor be instructed to pro.
emote this person. If the people of the City of London are to be
ssaulted by drunken police awns, I don't know what we shall
come to by-and-by. There must be twenty-four boute.notiee of
bail. Police officers are extremely useful; hut if they-nibistondutt
themselves, and abuse the power they are entkkti to. eiteteise, no
persons can do more mischief.
Two officers of the establishmtnt of Bow-street stated that they
attended by direction of the Magistrates, to ascertain the nature
of the charge against the defendant, who had been an officer only
six days.
The Loan Maros was glad to bear that so mach interest was
felt with respect to the conduct of the police.

BIRTH.
At Glasgow, ast the 1 Silt Waits dr Lady of Liam-U.4
Hadar, of a son.

Chiblin
Watert.ril
Guernsey and Jersey
Lisbon
Donsghsdeit
Banos Ayres
Nonni?

AILS-rTillb
♦aa. MPG
1 0 Prance
1 0 Bamberg
1 O !!ailed
,0 • 0 Swedes
o Brazil
o America
O 1 Leeward Wands

Alm 101
1 •
0
1 •
0 •
0 •
O I
O 0

digs-#14.111.tt st LONDON-BRIDGE TO.m oTrAtit
Noraior •
to
Afterglow Ls,
wastawatioutes
sitaisßee
Lome: sod I'reeko
sc the leas Orotros No. t, Pickett-One, Toomplo•Ibt.

be tells
the pa,
etablith
longed
seer's. •
it there
other;
: of the
be same
the aim gii
It extract
hies of
les Wife ;Amami
ANNINIO
added/
r's.
Aldeft A
_Jars
t at thf ja_ o"."'_
ad oftetl
tad hi
this Ai Ia
thing fuf
mad td
end leo
Piglet*
Ain*
Worship, IMO
soe Aroall
sot sots. Darese-
30t Was sable
r elan
ben time
o develt
ved abs
vs old* •
th, win 1
11
be Grow OM
la oath* P
AN apey
schatgeti
Or if they A.
taw, ea
lbw
r of Paw. -u
MI6
°CP*, *a • 1!
Defeatist 1000..
pew* rove
seed thwa,
' steal
wake lay Pre
e Senna; INN
le damp Dew
tam ;
awn
It'd by* lassad
rod dot lo alts
vas emirs
d? he tell
and dam& Jasr wisilosaw
Led fot lie 131
e, who bed
rMf.Grew, *MP_
go and wit 4lft,
bat as we wig
do of air awasP
as gnarl
the eery Da
hay, woe of Ys
eeipt of de ad*
d made do Men
by areas. 0001
.td ; hut the row;
to prisoo.. Sel
of bound to Pier
Se boy wept 411.1
Oda
d labour.—
tealiag this,
wing *dd.
seven days
berated, see
og him wid
committed d
4 yesterday
vented front
•oatire never
an the Ace.
Broadway,
ng
unabk to
y lodgings.
brought taw
rds attempt..
3ean's•beli4
emitted de
w **body
rant lust*
to St. Tu.
quest.
• wet
et a yomg Inbe
tad invited
hment (he Int
indoess the &al
Ve
o>a
homieflicojiYkroica'd,are:bilbowibuhealliaciy:ll;:t 4-71.11
:d him; oa
piing in the T(
inking. He
ew out the
elongiog to
ho, haviar
ts, had hi'
ion) which
then takes
was immt
Ration.
Liest.-cevi
s, Bert. Royal
italic Does
Alm Pm
1 • 1
o
I •
0
O a a
O I 1
0
MORROW.
* after 10
• adtv___t_r:,)(l
a-Prefrlit4 1. 1
nrifahre