Star.
London, England, 1821-02-21 00:00:00

ERUPTIONS ON TliE FACE.

Leicester, September 18, 1820.
SIR—I will thank you to send me a supply of your
valuable A NTISCORBUTIC DROPS. The sale of this
medicine, with me, at least, surpasses all others, which is a
circumstance of itself that speaks much in favour of its merits,
but is nothing compared with the testimonials of its efficacy
which have come to my knowledge I not to mention more than
one instance:

The wife of a most respectable person in this plate, who had
long been affected with the Scurvy in her face, to suck a degree
as quite to disfigure her, was induced (from seeing your adver-
tisements in the Leicester Chronicle) to make a trial of a bottle or
two of the Antiscorbutic Drops. This experiment she had no
reason to complain of; on the contrary, sbe was highly gratified
to find their good effects even now strikingly manifest; she
therefore took two or three more 4s. Stl. bottles, and made use
of the Lotion, till at length her face was quite free from those
unpleasant eruptions, which had hitherto been productive of so
much pain, trouat.., and expense.
Though she bud occasionally experienced relief from_ Sea
Bathing, yet the complaint soon after became as visible as ever.
It is now several months since your Medicine was last used, but
there appears no probability of the return of the 'disease. Equal
success has been manifested, where the parties had been recom-
mended to take the Drops by the Lady in question.
I have been induced to say thus much of your Antiscorbutie
Drops, at the request of the husband of the Lady alluded to,
who is anxious that those who may be similarly situated with
herself, befit(' she became acquainted with your Drops, May
•avail themselves of their use.

It will give me pleasure to answer any inquiries, either per-
sonally or by letter (itost-paid); and believe me, Sir, to remain,
Your a, very respectfully, •
T1103(413 TIIOMPSON, Chronicle Office, Leieester.
'Po Mr. John Ligount. Surgeon, &c. Manchester.
These Drops are sold In moulded square bottles, at es: 94.-
4s. Id. and Ils. (oat lls. bottle is equal to three Ss. Ad, ones),
by Mr. Lignnm, N0..57, Bridge street, Manchester; and by J.
and C. Evans, 4g, Long-lane, West Smithfield; Sutton and Co.
Bow Churchyard; Barclay od Sons, 95, Fleet-market; T. and
C. Butler,. 4, Cheapside, E. Edwards, 66, St. Paul's Church-
yard, London; Batter and Sons, 54, Sackville.street' Newbury
and Sons 4, llame-street, Dublin; It. Scott, J. Baxter,
South-bridge, Etlinburgh It. Nelson, Surgeon, and J. Baxter.
Italian Warehouse, Glasgow; and all Medicine Venders.
Of whom also may be had, Mr. Lizittnic lartkovEa Lenox,
for all.,Scorbutic Eruptions, price 2s. 9d. duty included.
N,B. Lignum s numerous professional engagements pre-
clude the poisibility of his attending to any lettrs of advice, un-
Icsalhe usual compliment of a ,Cj note be inclosed.

FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZETTE.
[This Gazette sidin the appointment of Vice-Admiral Sir
George Martin, K.C.B. to be a Knight Grand Cross'of the said
Order, vice Admiral So George Campbell, deceased; and also
of Mr. Robert Dunkin, fun. to be Hanoverian Consul at Sr.
Michael's Mount, Mount's Bay, Cornwall].
BANKRUpTCY SUPERSEI/F:D.
Timothy Francis Powell I.onduneereet, merchant.
BANKRUPTS.
John Ewing, Liverpool, merchant, to surrender March 21,22,
and April 3, at one, at the George Inn, Dale-street, Liver-
pool. Attornies, Messrs. Stathan and Foster, Liverpool ;- or
altssrs. Slade and Jones, John-street, Betlfori•rove
Francis INnely, Pershore, Worcestershire, money-scrivener, ,
March 19, at three, 20, at ten, and April at eleven, at the .
Angel Inn, .Pershore. Attornies, Messrs. Williams and
White, Lincoln's Inn; or Mr. (eld;ker, Pershore.
John Effr;rt Eudicott, Exeter, builder, March 15,14, and April
3, at eleven, at the Globe Tavern, Exeter. Attornies, Nlessrs.
Darke and Co. Red Lion-square; or Mr. Terrell, Exeter.
Martin hens, Cateaby; Northamptonshire, grazier, February
26, at the Craven Anna flood, Coventry, 27, and April 3, '
at the Bell Inn, Dunchurch, Warwickshire, ot eleven. At-
tornies, Mr. Wratislaw, Rugby, Warwickshire; or Messrs.
Fullerand Salt Well, Carlton Chamber., Regent-street.
William Ivens, late of Ilecknoe, Warwickshire, sailer, Fe-
. bruary 26, at the Craven Arms Ikt a, Cdventry, 27, and
April 3, at the Bell Inn, Dunchurch, Warwickshire, at eleven.
Attornies, Mr. WratisLw, Rugby, Warwickshire ; or Messrs.
Fuller and Saltwell, Calton Chambers, Regent-street.
Richard. Ivens, late of Byfield, Korthamptorshire, tanner, Fe-
bruary 26, at the Craven Arms Hotel, Coventry,. 27, and
April '3, at the Bell Inn, Dunchurch,. Warwickshire, at
eleven. Attornies, Mr. Wratislaav, Rugby, Warwickshire;
or Messrs. Fuller and Saltwell, Carlton Chambers, Regent et.
John Robertson, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, silversesith, February
26,. March 17, and April 5, at eleven, at the George Inn,
Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Attornies, Altana. Donkin and Sta-
ble, Newcastle-upon-Tyne; or Messrs. Meggisons and Poole,
Verulam-buildings, Gray's Tan.
George Clark, Blackburn, Lancashire, grocer, March 14, at
five, 15, at eleven, and April 3, at twelve, at the Castle Inn,
Blackburn. Attornies, Mr. BLikelock, Serjeant's. Inn, Fleet-
street; or Mr. Dewburst, Blackburn,
Richard Wood, Kendal, bookseller and stationer, March 7110,
and April Z. at ten, at Guildhall, London. Attornies, Mr.
Carpenter Furnival's Inn. Holborn ; or Mr. Wert, Kendal.
William liebdin, Leeds, woollen-clothamerzhant, March 6,7,
and April 5, at eleven, at the Court-house, Leeds. Attornies,
Mr. Wilson, Grevllle-street, Hatton-garden ; or Messrs.
Smith and Moore, Leeds.
John Browne, sea. Leeds, woollen-cloth-merchant, March 6,
7, and April 3, at eleven, at the Court-house, Leeds. Attar-
Dies, Mr. Wilson, Greville-street, Ilatton-garden; or Messrs.
Smith, and Moore, Leeds.
Thomas Benham, Poole,. builder, March 19, at four, 20, and
April 3, at ten, at the Lotidon Tavern, Poole. Attornies,
Messrs. Alexander and Hahne, Newt Inn, London; or Mr.
Par, Poole.
John James Coward, Exeter, spirit-merchant, March 13,14,
and April 3, at eleven, at the Globe Tavern, Exeter. At-.
tonnes, Messrs. Darke and Co. Red Lion-square ; or Mr.
Terrell, North-street, Exeter.
Joseph Catternfiee, Late of Framlingham Suffolk, merchant,
March 5, at six, 6, and April 3, at eleven, at the Bear and
Crown, Ipswich. Anomie', Mr. Clubbe, Framlingham; or
Messrs. Bromley, Gray's Innarquare.
John Pullinger, late of Itchingswell, Hants, tanner, March 19,
at six, tO, and April 3, at three, at the Black Swan, Win-
cheater. Anoraks, Mr. Allen, Clifford's Inn; or Air. Wood-
ham Winchester.
John Imam Canterbury, linni-draper February 7, March
3, and April 3, at twelve, at Guildhall, London. Attorney,
Mr. Jones, Sise-lane.
Wickens Hodges, New ington-Causeway, Surrey, straw-hat-
manufacturer, March 5,10, and April 5, at eleven, at Guild-
hall. ' Attornies, Messrs. Jones and lloward, Mincing-lane.
DIVIDENDS to be made at GUILDHAI.L.
March 17, J. and C. Bigg, Hatfield, Beres, brewers, at ten.
March 17, G. Dann, Linton, Kent, butcher, at one. March
17, M. Ross, Dowgate-hill; merchant, at ten.
DIVIDENDS to be made in the COUNTRY.
March 14, G. Bellairs, Leicester, banker, at eleven, at the
White Hart Inn, Leicester. March 14, J. and W. Jackson,
Dowgate-wharf 'and* Bisbopwearmouth, bankers, at eleven, at
the Bridge .Inn, Blahopwearmauth. Marcia 16, T. Snasdell,
BartoL-Bendish, Norfolk,' cattle-jobber, at eleven, at the King's
Arms Inn, East Dereham. March 16, T. Tipping, Warriug-
ton, miller, at eleven, at the George Inn, Warrington. March
19, W. Watts, Manchester, calico-print-seller, aceleven, at the
Star Inn,..Deansgate, Manchester. Marchl4, D. Watt, South-
wick, Durham, ship-builder, at eleven, at the Bridge Inn,
lii-
shopweamtouth. March 16, T. Burge, Frome Selwood, Sa-
merset, carrier, at eleven, at the George Inn, Frome Salwood.
March 16, T. Green, Liverpool, auctioneer, at eleven, at the
Vibes of Mr. I'. Woods, Lord-street, Liverpool. arch 16,
G. Marshall, Bristol, corn-factor, at twelve, at the Commer-
cial Rooms, Bristol. March 14, J. zi.lunderson and T. Masters,
late of Sutton, Bedfordshire, corn-factors, at eleven, at the
Swan Inn, Bedford.
CERTIFICATES-Marten 13.
J. W. Hayton, Greenheld, Flintshire, wire and iron-manu-
facturer. W. H. Lawrence, Bath, linen-draper. T. Peacapp,
Liverpool, wine-merchant. . Q. and F. Atkinson, Kirbynr)or-
side, Yorkshire, corn-merchants. 0. Webb, Cornhill, dealer.
T. Dellin, Birmingham, dealer. I'. Clayton, late of Waterloo-*
place. Pall-mall, saddler. I. Marstcn, Birmlnehane coal-dealer.
E. Woolley, Bilston' Staffordshire, iron-master. J. Hendee-
son, Ludgate-bill, linen-draper. Dl. Daly, lase of Blackman-
street, Southwark, dealer in spirits. .
DISSOLUTIONS OF PARTNERSHIPS.
Hawkins and Blackburn, Farneomb, Surrey, crape-mann-1
facturers.. B. and S. Joce, Exeter, mercers. Sranden and
Ilevritt,Westmoreland-buildings, Akiersgateastreet,silver-casters.
Iluntrrand Kerr, l'orteGlasgow. Tenstail and Co. Nantwich,
Cheshire, soap-boilers. ?Ankle and Allardice, Berwick-upon-
Tweed, boot-makers. 7/tuner and Thies, Liverpool, merchants.
Myles. and Co. Sheffield, cutlers. Butler and Pldding, Bristol,
milliners. Jones and Co. coal-workers. Dixon and Co. Man-
chester, calico-printers. Rates and Co. Lieerpool, rope-makers.
Fricake and Cste. Bishop's-enure Old Bailey, sugar-refiners.
Eastwood and Clarkson Thorne, Yorkshire, millers. Tomlin-
son and Co, Binnlngba:ll, merchants. Washbourn and Gardner,
Marlborough, surgeons. Barnette and Gauguin, late of Cres-
cent-place. 13bcktriars, bee-Merchants. Fox and Ashton, Bath,
fiehmonners.

, • HOUSE Or LORDS, FEBRUARY 2'
Tire Earl of Moiaraaariair took the oaths and ids seat.
THE QUEEN.
The Earl of LIVERPOOL rose to move the se.
cond reading of the Bill for granting an annuity of
£50,000 a-year to her Majesty. In making this
motion, he did not mean to enter into any discussion
on the subject, but merely wished to lay before their
Lordships the reason. which induced his Majesty's
Government to introduce this provision. At the
time of her Majesty's marriage, it was settled that in
case of her surviving her Royal Consort, she should
be, either in the capacity, of. Queen Dowager or
widow of the Prince of Wales, entitled to an annuity
of 1:50,000 during her life; and it was thought ad..
visable that; while living separate from his Majesty,
she should have the s..ine allowance. His Lordship
concluded by moving that the Bill be read a se-
cond time.
The Earl of DARNLEY said he did not rise to'
:oppose-the second reading of this WV, but he felt it
necessary to make some remarks on the conduct of
Ministers, whom lie considered as deserving of cen-
sure for the Whole of the conduct which they had
pursued towards the Queen, particularly in excluding
her name from the Liturgy. He wished, however,
to state, that if was not his intention to move any
Address to his Majesty to restore her name to the
Liturgy, because, as there were many persons who
were of opinion that the Government ought to be
supported, and this was a question which Govern.
ment would oppose, he feared he should r,nt be able
to gain the concurrence of a majority in.favour of
such a motion. At the same time he must not be
considered as pledging himself that he should not
bring forward this subjed at some future period. If
there were any occasion in which the House ought
to interpose 'between the King and his bad advisers,
it was the meant, when such impolitic proceedings
had been adopted against the Queen ; and when it
was clear that his Majesty's Ministers had acted
wrong towards her from the very beginning. Ile
assured their Lordships that it was not from any par=
titular partiality towards her Majesty that he took
' up her case in the way he did, for his acquaintance
with her formerly had been very limited; and since
her return to this country he had felt it a duty in-
cumbent on him to avoid any intercourse with her.
If it were thought advisable that her Majesty's name
should be used for party purposes, and that she
should continue to perpetuate her.influence in a way
injurious to the tranquillity of the country, the course
heretofore pursued by Ministers was the very one
that would effect that purpose. With. respect to the .
legality or illegality of omitting her Majesty's name
in the Liturgy, be did not feel himself competent to
argue that question, particularly after it had already
been so ably tieated in another place. But he knew
very well that a great majority of the people of this
cour.try ware favourable, not only to her Majesty's
right to be named in the prayers of the Church, but
felt that it was a •ht which it war unlawful to de.
prive her of. 13t.t, whether it was legal or not to
has c left her name out of the Liturgy, it certainly
was not just to have done so before her trial ; and
still more unjust to have continued the exclusion af-
ter her Majesty's acquittal—for the circumstance of
her prosecutors having thrown up' their brief was as
efficacious an acquittal as any that ever took place in
a Court ofJustice—it was three n up from a thorough
conviction that no case could be made out against
her Majesty. Ile maintained, then, that her Ma.
jesty was substantially acquitted, and that on that
account it was unjust to perpetuate the exclusion in
question. At the same time he must declar:- that
he did not approve of every part of her conduct ; .
and he did not wish to perpetuate that influence
on her part, which the prosecution carried on
against her Majesty had alone given rise to. Had
she not been ill advised by those who surrounded
her, and had it not been for the many objectionable
publications which had gone forth as coming imme•
diately from her, the name of her Majesty might at
this time be restored to the Liturgy. There was one
part of this subject to which he must advert, although
it had been rather ,too much urged in another place.
Ile alluded to the effect which the exclusion of her
Majesty's name had on the service of the Established
Church. He considered it a great calamity, that in
places of public worship, where all the littie feelitsgs
of party animosity ought to be forgotten, the People
were continually reminded of this omission; and the
' conduct of many persons, on such occasions, must
reflect dis7ace on those who were the authors of it.
This was a point well worthy the consideration of
their Lordships; and the consequence of what he now
' stated was, a considerable secession from the Esta-
blished Church; he thereiOre called on their Lord-
, . ships to reflect seriously whether, in this respect alone,
a perseverance in the injustice exercised towards the
Queen, would nut be productive Of serious evil to
' the country. He also understood that tevetal Rev.
• Gentlemen most improperly mixed politics with
their discourses floni the pulpit; and he h.T.trd of one
Clergyman who was bilged to exhort his .congre-
,. gation not to secede from the Church. He had now
said enough to cilisfy his own mind on the present
subject; and he should be happy if he th u:ht he
equally satisfied and convinced their Lordsh'ps. Ile
had felt it his duty to trouble them thus much ; and
, he should now leave done with a subject, any rencwal
of which must be paitifill to himself as n ed as others. •
• The LORD CHANCELLOR now rose from the
Woolsack, and said he had but very few woU4s-tO
address to their Lordships ; and he was called onto
, do so, in consequence of what had just fallen from
• the Noble Earl. He should not now enter on the
question whether it was expedient or not to omit Cal
insertion of her Majesty's name in the Liturgy. but
he must say, that if he had thought the omission 4
• her name to have been illegal, no considerati. n
expediency would ever have prevented him frou4 ads

Teasing the King to restore her namelo the Littirgy
f their Lordships would look at the history of the
cases in which the prerogatives of the Crown bad
for centuries past been exercised, and the different
Statuteshy Which those prerogatives were maintained,
all doubt must he removed from their Minds as to
the right of the King to do the act in question.
The Archbishop of CANTERBURY said be felt
it necessary to make a remark on what had been just
said of persons seceding from the Church in conse-
quence of the omission of her Majesty's name from
she Liturgy. If any such secession had taken place,
he must assure their• Lordships it must be imputable
to political, and not.to religious feelings—(Hear,
hear).—But of such secession he was altogether ig-
norant. It was far from his intention to undervalue
the claim of her' Majesty to haie her name restored
to*the Liturgy ; • but he •ntist. say, that it was not
altogether unaccorhpanied with the subject of reli-
gion. Her Majesty was alresidy payed for, as well
as every 'other member of the Royal Family ; and
.therefore "the distinction she sought for was merely a
political one.. Theie was no person in the country
who did' not. partake of the prayers of the Church;
and Goo forbid that the poorest person should not
enjoy that advantage ! The question here was not
one of religion, but merely of distinction in prayer,
of grace and courtesy.
. Lord ELLEN BOROUGH said, that when he con-
sidered what had been the conduct of the Queen, both.
before and since her arrival in this country, and par-
ticularly when he reflected on her letter to the King,
he did not see anything that should induce their Lord=
ships to grant her so great a favour as was now pro-
posed to be given by the present Bill. He was sure'
that, amidst the distresses which now spread, over
the country, there was no part of the conduct of pAr-
'lament which the people would view with More irk
probation than the very vote the House was then
called on to give, by which £50,000 a-year of the'
public money were to be given away, and perhaps
most improperly employed. lie himself was anxious
that the Queen should fall into utter oblivion, and
she was falling fast into it. It was to the rejection
of the Bill of Pains and Penalties, that he had to at-
tribute this happy change and consummation which
vas now fast approaching ; for if that Bill had passed,
the Queen would be still held.torth as an object of
public persecution; the public irritation would be
perpetuated, and the public prate would be disturbed.'
But Ho such evils were now likely to happen. There

were; indeed, some rumours abroad,•tti:itit was her
-.Alajesty's, intention not to receive this money until
her name was restored to the Liturgy. He hoped.
7: timer {Amours were unfounded; that her Majesty would
listen to better councils, and that she would be in-
duced to depart from the advice under which she had
hitherto acted. He hoped she would take the money,
and, in future, abstain ftom doing 'anything which
might hereafter serve to perpetuate discussion's in
Parliament, and to interrupt the public business.
The Earl of LIMERICK could not, without re-
gret,' view the largeness of the present grant, while
• tic country was in to distressed a state, and when he'
rec-olleCted what her Majesty's conduct had been.
Tne 'E irl of BLESSINGTON could not agree
that the annuity of the Queen was too large ; on the
' • contrary, he should say, if he spoke his mind, it was
too small. Ministers should have given her an out-
fit, and a house befitting her rank, failing, as they
had done; in the Bill of Pains and Penalties against
• her. But he was not.standing there as an apologist
for the Queen, nor of that advice which had made her
refuse this grant in another place. At the same time.
he was not giving up her right a have her name re-
stored to the Liturgy, which he thought she was le-
gally entitled. to. The Country thought so also; and
until that took placed there would be no peace or
quiet, but an eternaNbullition of public sentiment.
He had heard of one Church being shut up in conse-
quence of the Clergyman not praying for the queen.
lit the Church of Scotland, and the North of Ireland
she was prayed for; and what would the conse-
quence of a_general dissent from the Church of Eng-
land be? Did the People oL England like tithes ?
ille,knew that there was a strong disposition in the
People in the North of Ireland to join the Church of
Scotherd. He would not propose any addition to
the vote, but would support it as it now stood.
Lord CALTHORPE said, he considered the grant
was not too much ; and that Ministers had acted
wisely in not reducing it below this sum.
The Marquis of LANSDOWN thought that at
this moment they should not press the House to a
discussion on so mischievous a subject, which could
beof no.advantage either to her Majesty or the coun-
try ; and he had, therefore, mentioned that opinion
to his Noble Friend (Darnley), and he, with the
concurrent opinions of others, had determined to
forego his motion for an inquiry into the conduct of
the -King's Government on this subject. Disap-
proving as he did of the Qneen's Letter to the King,
and the AnsWers Co various Addresses, he must at
the same time think that in the extraordinary situation,
by the abandonment of the Bill, in which she was
placed, it was the height of cruelty to make her an-
swerable for conduct in a situation in which no Queen
of England was ever before placed. Whatever errors
or improprieties she might have comrnitted since she
arrived in this country, he thought she ought to be
placed in a situation becoming her rank and dignity.
The Bill was then read a second time, and ordered
to be committed to-morrow (this day).—Adjourned.
HOUSE OP COMMONS.
The Irish Court of Exchequer Fees Bill was brought in by
Mr. C. Ommt, and read a first thne, and ordered to be read a
second time on the 2d of March.
Sir M. W. RIDLEY gave notice he would to-morrow move
for a Return of the Fres received by. the Admiralty for the
last tea years. •
Ikla BENNETT moved for a Return of the number of per-
wisebtivicted of Forgery, and executed for that offence, in Ire-
land, during the last three years.
The Report of the Committee on•the Flax and Cotton Acts
was brought up, the Resolation was agreed to, and a 13111 or-
dered accordingly.

ARRICULTURAL DISTRESS.
• Sir W. LEMON presented Petitions from Truro
and four other places in the• county of Cornwall,
of the present Agricultural Distress.
complaining
Similar Petitions were presented from Gloucester,
Doncaster, and various places in Warwickshire. I
A Petition was presented by Mr. CHSTWYND from
certain Owners and Occupiers of Land in the county
of Derby, complaining of Agricultural Distress.
Sir 1. COFFIN observed, it might appear like pre-
/uptown in him, who was neither an agriculturist