Star.
London, England, 1820-08-24 00:00:00

*ear that part of tie deck ?—As soot is I away I cad as
know what was passing.
' The witness must know if be left any body. Was any body
else suffered so remain when the witness was directed to go
away 7—Before I west away? All afterwards Ido not know
anything about.
That's the time...—Af the moment I went away, something
was ordered, and I could not pay attention to what was done,
or who remained.
At the time that her Royal Highness and Bergami were re-
clining on the tent, was the weather calm or stormy ?—lt was
summer-time, and fine weather.
Was there much motion in the vessel?—There were light
summer airs. There was hardly any tide to make a motion. It
was calm. The ship did not move.
By the Earl of ROSEBERRY.—In the voyage to Jaffa,
the witness has said there was a communication from the tent.

—Was it to the ship below, or only to a particular place from
which there was no ether exit?—l will describe it—L-The wit-
ness took up a pen to make a plan of the place]—De their Lord-
ships wish for a drawing of a part or of the whole deck?
What I want to know is, if there was any communication
from the tent to any part of the ship ; and if so, to what part?—
[The witness made a drawing with pen and ink, and it was
handed into the House].
From the tent, so pliced, was there any possibility to get to
the dining-room?—Yes, there is another place, which I have
marked, a little higher up.
The witness has described the position of her Royal highness
and 13ergami on a gun. Were there any other persons but
himself capable of seeing that position ?—Yes, two or three. A
part of the crew was on deck taking the air, and they might see,
if they chose.
Does the witness recollect in what part of the ship Theodore
Majocco slept during the voyage ?—Yes, he had a place assigned
him, and a hammock in the hold.
Could he possibly observe what passed in the tent?—When
he slept in the hold he could not, for it must have passed through
two decks.

By Lord ELLENBOROUGH—Did Theodore always sleep
in the hold ?—I do not know. _ _ _

Where did Bergami sleep, in the voyage from Jaffa?—There
were two beds under the tent. Wherrthe tent was open a small
bed could be seen in which was Bergami.
Had Bergami any other known place to sleep in but the tent?
When the Princess and Bergami *slept under the tent I did not
see them; but I am morally certain that the Princess and Ber-
gami slept under the tent, because the horses made a great noise,
and they kid they could not bear to sleep below.
Where were the beds placed in the voyage from Jaffa which
the witness described in the voyage from Tunis ?-0n the sofa
there was only left a single mattress of the Princess's. The other
mattresses were placed on the bed below.
The witness has stated that the cabin was divided in two, and
that the bed fo: Bergami was in the dining-room. I wish to
know where the beds were placed, and not the mattresses
merely?—The bed of the Princess remained where it was. Ai
to Bergami'• bed, when he got up it was rolled up. It was not'
on a bedstead, but it was put down on the planks of the cord-
dor, and was rolled up in the morning. •
Did any alteration take place in the arrangement of the beds
during the voyage from Tunis "to Jaffa? Witness drew a plan
of the arrangement made on that voyage, and stated, that the
only alteration was, that the bed of Bergami was placed in the
dining-room near the door.
Was Bergami's bed made for him every night during the
voyage from Jaffa ?—I cannot tell what took place in the apart-
ments of the Princess; I did not go into them except when the
Princess landed, or any of her suite, at which periods I went in
to render any assistance that was wanted; it was then I saw that
Bergami's bed was there.
Did no person sleep where Majocco used to sleepl—When
Majocco had his bcd lower down, Camera slept in the apart-
ment.

How many tents were provided on the journey to Jerusalem?
Ido not know the number ; there were severaL -
By the LORD CHANCELLOR.—Where did the female
attendants sleep during the voyage from Jaffa?—A cabin was
assigned to them.
By Lord BELIIAVEN.—Did witness see a light put from
under the tent after the parties in it had retired to rest 7—The
light was sometimes put under the tent; sometimes through WI
opening.
Who took the light from under the tent or from the opening ?
Different persons. Sometimes one, sometimes ar.other took it
away. Do you know who gave the light?—Nn.
Did it remain for some time in the tent after everything might
he arranged ?—h did not remain beyond the time when every
thing might be arranged in the tent.
Did any person sleep in the dining room during the voyage
from Jaffa?—Am I to speak of what I saw with my own eyes,
or what I heard other persons say ?
Mr. DrNMAN begged leave to object to the question being an-
mend in any other way than according to the rules established
in Courts of Justice, namely, as to what the witness himself
saw or heard.

The LORD CHANCELLOR sustained Mr. Eknman'a ob-
jection.
Lord BELHAVEN said, he only meant for the witness to
state what he had seen.

Did any person sleep in the dining-room during the voyage
from Jaffa?-4 do not know.

By the Earl DARNLEY—Does the witness knew whether
the Princess took off her clothes at night?—When the Princess
and Bergami slept on deck, I often saw the Princess open the
tent a little, dressed in a white gown, or a dreuing-gown, or
some gown, in order to get a mouthful of air before bun-rise.
By Lord ELLENBOROUGH—Did you ever see Bergaml
look out of the tent at the same time with the Princess ?—No ;
the Princess only opened the tent so as to merely get a little air.
Mr. Dursurr wished to ask the name of the vessel at Messina,
in which witness-had a share?—/1 Vero Fidele.

Does it belong to the port of Messina?—Yes.
What are the names of you' partners, the other part owners?
Only Jacomo Milanes!.
By Lord LAUDERDALE—CouId any one hear in the
roam below what passed in the tent when it was closed ?—Yrs.
Here the examination of this witness closed, and he was di-
rected to withdraw.

The LORD CHANCELLOR said, as the second witness's
examiration had not been concluded, and as five o'clock had ar.
rived, the House would adjourn. Previons to adjournment, he
wished to state, that be bad consulted the sources of information
and found that prosecutions against witnesses for perjury might
be maintained. He stated this, that the public mind might be
set at rest. But as they must not lose sight of their own
privilege, he should be prepared to move a Resolution to-morrow
on the subject. Ile did not take it for panted that there would
be any occasion for prosecutions, but as the question had been
agitated he had instituted the inquiry.—Adjourned st 5 o'Clock.