Star.
London, England, 1818-05-22 00:00:00

CAPtDAL LOTTERY
'Begins Drawing 4th Jane, KUM'S BIRTH DAT.
GWEBB, Stock-Broker, 9, CORNHILL, and 17,
• lATI3GAT4S7attr, has the satisfaction to announce another
Lcttery on the same principle as the last, which was so highly
intov,l of, and in which mot Capitol Prizes were obtained by
Inc Public teas in any prerina Lotter!' aye known!
THE PRESENT LOTTERY CONTAINS
Three- Prizes of Twenty Thousand Pounds !
pith 104 more Capitals, and 4,000 llcketa less than the last
lottery. All the Prizes are Sterling Money, and the Lottery
yin be drawn on the old favourite plan (as the last was); more
PI its favour neLd t,ot be said ; but an early purchase is recom-
zeoged, as tha first Twenty Prizes will receive in addition
41000 each, .e 20,000 in the first half hour.
'rickets and Shares are selling at
WEBB's fortunate Offices,
9, CORNIIILL, AND 17, LUDGATE-STRUM,
'Where Four Capitals, in the Last Lottery, were sold in Shares,
;:.111iree £30,000 Prizes in the short space of thirteen menthe.
•lt k estimated titat not less than Eight Hundred Persons
rfatipete,: ”i the Capitals of the late lottery, every Share of
Grua P: ice. having be,-is sold to tiv: Public.
-

GcIUT AND RHEUMATISM.
THE Rumy which experience abundantly pmves
to be most successful in the Goer, RIIIMATIC Gorr, and
RAUH-Mar is

Dr. WILSON'S TINCTURE
A tingle dose will, in a few hours, remove the most agonising
../21; aid a few repetitions will effestually subdue the tons-
Mat• %CLUE composition is so innocent that a child may
Li! it with Lit4ty.
5441 u bok..cle and retail by Sutton and Co. 10, Bow Church-
'l:"4; atti te:Ail by Sanger, 150, Oxford-street ; Stradling,
lßoyaall
; Ward, Holborn; Harris, St. Paurs Church-yard;
sa.
4.`e
tr, Oxford-street; bloorehonse, Aldgate ; Osborne, lii-
l_goNate.street, London; and by most 'Medicine Vendors of
ritlitt in town and country, in bottles of 4s. 6d. and 20s. each.
ZL:. WiLsor may be consulted during the present month,
41 a-.ents, No. 77 Lower Grosvenor-street, from tbe
up' Nro.
/I'm to fire daily ; or will give his personal atrandonoto
1.'4"4.--••••31.ay 1, 1818.

.14pr Cent - . . A• • . t
. I
41ZeordeZ or•Sio-oc
. .
.4.,:i4
41111, L ;'l3. 1
.;kitkr.. -.•:.
•,. 11 Y Z ..•
• ' .;11.11111t .i ‘
---.••..,'' • -
iy,
,-
(v 4t.`"
,I, - 1/4 • , OZ I ' ..C. ' 'llf4 • $
.. . . .. - %.,' •I'
f() : *C., ..4 4, akliiit it .46 . •
. • , • • :•N •
i
'''':Vie'l ‘f..N % V-7-.Z. 1 ft(
V It* • .
• h
..• 1 I j
FRIDAY, MAY .22, 1818: • 111110 E SEVAN -PENCE.
i i---‘rsv or __
- - 1 1
titrtwr. - _
. ill.'
) ..-
-....eing me- '
P 4
I 1 !
7
I
i
. ,
l'
till t
1 , ,
1I i \ ,T'
,1
1 '
. ',
\ , • i
. i
. ~ ii
•
. 1 •
1
)., I . I
.\ i
•
1
I (
..
1) 11,
t.•
~.
I %,. ' •
1 3 1
li ..
ii + '
• :
1
' 1 i
I
, 1
' 1
' 4$
1 2.1
. :. 1
i
. ,
i '.ef .
: il• P .

Sir WILLIAM CURTIS called the attention of
the House to the Petition respecting the Funds of
the Corpotation of London, and the order of the
House for their production. He entered into several
explanations to shew what expensive undertakings
the City bad entered into in the building and irn-
ing of Jails, which the inhabitants were not
hound to do, and argued that it was not fair or just
to call for the papers that had been moved for. In
the time of Charles I. 99,7811. were granted hy Par-
liament for building Newgate and other prisons,
which proved that the Corporation were not bound
to find tunds for such purposes. He therefore moved
that the Petition of the City of London, of the sth of
May, be referred to a Select Committee.
Scrjeant ONSLOW said, this was the last resort
of the City of London, who had protracted, by all
manner of means, complying with the order of the
House of the 24th Of February, for producing their
accounts ; and now it must be evident, that if tl-.e
Committee were to be granted, the Session would be
over before the Report could be made, and the House
would be unable to go into the charge of the mis-
application of their funds. Ile should therefore move
the previous question.---The question being put,
Sir J. SHAW vindicated the City of London, and
contended that the Order ought to be rescinded.
Mr.WROTTESLEYsupported the original motion.
Sir M. W. RIDLEY thought if the Corporation
would not press for the additional sum ot. money
which they had applied for, and for which a Bill
was before the Howe, it would he a strong argu-
ment in favbur of the motion, which he was inclined
to support.
Mr. HOLME SUNINER believed that this was,
in truth, the only instance in which parties had come
to this House desiring to be heard by Counsel against
an Order issued by the House for the purpose of ob-
taining information. The I lonottrable Baronet had
said, that he did not mean to dispute the rights of
the House to call for information, when just g ot nds
were shewn for it. Surely when the City of London
came forward. demanding, in order to build its own
prisons, a grant out of a tax levied on the inhabitants
of the neighbouring Counties, it was incumbent en
them to shew in what manner they had disposed cf
their own funds. The City of London had embezc
zled the sum of 53,000/. vested in trust in its hands ;
a sum which it had applied for purposes quite diffe-
rent from those for which it was given them. Would
-the City of London sit down under this? The pre-
sent motion was of a piece with the rest of the con.
duct of the City; All of them ;cum that as soon as
Counsel should be called in, the House would go to

ii•
• .r 0