Star.
London, England, 1820-10-10 00:00:00

Is4nT.

Wu the copy made from the original ?—Yes, with a very few
Ines, which have not been copied.
Are they faithful extracts, so far as they purport to be et-
tracts?—They do net contain an account of the whole transac-
tions; they contain but scene particulars, such as dams, and the
names of several places.
By the.Sotmerroa-Gaintam.—Look at the paper, but do not
read it. State how long you were on the wage from Jaffa to
Tunis P—We sailed en $e lith of July, and arrived at Syra-
cuse on the 30th of August.
On the voyage from Jaffa to Tunis, where did Bergamo' sleep?
I—ln the dining-room.
Did he sleep there every night?—He did, to the best of my
recollection.

Duxes.
I am a Lieutenant in the Royal Navy, and am now stationed
in Sicily. I saw her Royal Highness at Messina. in March, 1615.
I took the command of a gun-boat. Her Royal Highness ap-
plied to me to proceed with her on a voyage to Constanti-
nople, and other places. A polacca was hired for that pur-
pose, and her Royal Highness gave me the command of her.
I fitted up the cabins in the polacca according to the order of
her Royal Highness, and at her expense. When we got to
Tunis a surgeon came on board. I believe he is not now living.
I have heard he is not. When we were at Tunis it became neces-
sary to change the bed-rooms. Bergami's room was changed from
the neighbourhood of the dining-room to the after cabin on the
right-hand aide of the ship. I know the bed-rooms occupied by
the Princess and Berganii during the whole voyage.
. From the situation in which the bed-rooms were placed, was
it possible for the Princess and Bergainl to see one another in
bed say no—lt was not possible.
Witness continued :—I was sometimes called for by her
!Loyal Highness, to know how the weather was. She called me
sometimes from the cabin, and also when she slept under a tent
oat deck.—What was Garciulo's situation in the polacca? He was
Captain of the ship. Bat I was considered acting Captain, by
order of her Royal Highness, and all orders that came from het
Royal Highness were given by me as Captain of the ship.
Did Garciulo's situation call him particularly to attend her
!Wel Highness's person on board?—No; assuredly not.
If she had to go down stairs for a necessary purpose, was
it likely that Gam-halo would know it? Was there anything in
his duty to call him to know that ?
The Soeierroa-Grossaat. objected to the question.—The ques-
tion was not pressed.
Garciulo's duty was to attend to the men, and it was not ne-
cessary that he should be in the part of the ship appropriated
to her Royal Highness.
Was it his 'duty to attend to her Royal Highness at all,
except you gave him orders to do so ?—Not at all. The
Captain of the ship took orders from me. It was his duty.
The teat on the deck was within three or four feet from the
steersman during the night and day. On the return from Jaffa
I slept en the deck once, within five feet of the tent.—.
The steersman might hear what passed in the tent puecalty.
A conversation such as usually takes place between two peruse
might be heard where the steersman was and where I was. I
never heard any conversation. I was near enough to hear.
The tent did not cover the whole of the deck. There was a
passage alongside of it. I used to go along that. passage at
night. The light was taken away because we heard of pirates
at Athens and Milo, and we would not shew a light, which
might have discovered us. The light was removed from the
tent after that representation was made. There was a ladder
that went down to the dining-room ,from the tent. It was
kept open at night, for the tent covered the passage, but the
opening was always clear. The tub in which her Royal
Highness bathed could not go into the Princess's cabin.—
I:. was too large. lier Royal Highness has called to me In the
night, when 1 disturbed her repose by manoeuvring the ship. I
was obligee to open the tent when I did not distinctly hear her
Royal Highness. On the return from Jaffa, I do not know
where be slept. On going out, he slept in the dining-room. The
cabin bad two divisions. That of the Princess's was much larger.
There was a communication between them ; a door, and two
skylights, that opened on the deck. There were guns on deck. I
never saw the Princess sitting on a gun, nor in any person's lap.
I never saw her with her arms round the neck of any person. I
never knew her kiss any one but the child Victorine. I never
saw the slightest iteetoptiety nor indecency in her conduct to
Bergami or any other person. On Bergami's taking leave, he
kissed her hand, which was done by all persons on taking leave. I
have been in the Navy about sixteen years. I wear the Orders
of Merit and Fidelity, given me by the King of Naples, for taking
several privateers while in the Neapolitan navy. I have re-
ceived the Royal permission to wear one of them.
Crass-ermined by the SOLICITOR-GIN/RAU
How long were you on the voyage from Tunis to Jaffa 7—l
do not recollect exactly.
Ido not put you to a day—l ask you about how long 7—Be-
tween two and three months, I should conceive.
How long were you on the voyage from Jaffa to Syracuse?
.—Nearly a month.
Do you mean to say it was no more?—lt might have been
more : I cannot be exact to the day.
Will you say it was not two months ?—I cannot say without
referring to the paper.
[lkre the witness produced a written paper, which he stated
tb be a memorandum made on the voyage.]
Is that paper the original memorandum?—No, it is a copy.
Why did you make the copy ?—Because I thought I might
want it hereafter.
Where did you make nut the copy from your own original
memorandum ?—On the voyage from Messina to Syracuse.
Where is the original ?—ln Sicily.
For what purpose did you bring the copy ?—I brought it in
case I should be asked about any particular circumstances by
any friends.
Why did you not bring the original ?—Because some part of
it concerned particular affairs.
Can you tell how long you were on the voyage from Jaffa to
Syracuse?—lt might be more than a month. I cannot say with-
out looking at this paper. It was from one td two months. I
cannot say exactly.
Was it nearer two months than one month?—l should think
it was nearly two months, now that I reflect on it.
Will you say it was not more than two mouths?—No, I cannot.
The witness was ordered to withdraw.
Lord EItSKINE said, the witness who had just withdrawn
held a memorandum in his hand, and he stated that he could not
recollect a particular date without referring to that memoran-
dum. It appeared to him that Counsel could not deny to the
we.nees the opportunity of refreshing his memory, and at the
same time persist in asking him a question which he could not
answer without referring to that memorandum.
The Soticiron-Granuet said, that the paper held by the wit-
ness was not the original memorandum, but a copy, taken by
him on a subsequent voyage; he submitted to their Lordships
that the witness had no right to refresh his memory by looking
at that copy.
Lord EItSKINE added, that if the ',Fitness were not allowed
to refresh his memory, the Counsel was bound to take it with
ha defects, hut not to tax it as he bad done.
The. LORD CHANCELLOR said, that if the memory'. The following is a copy of a letter from the Under Secretary
dam was objected to, and that objection could be sustained, the to the Admiralty, addressed to Mr. J. Bans Err, jun. Lloyd's:
n:etuory of the witness might be taxed. 0 Admiralty-Office, Octiaber 7, 1820.
Lord LIVERPOOL said, that if the memorandum held by ..Srs— Having laid before my Lords Commissioners of the
the witness was made on the voyage from Jaffa to Syracuse, the Admiralty, your letter of this date, submitting, by direction of
wi;ness had a right to refresh his memory from it ; but if the the Committee for managing the affairs of Lloyd's, the expedi-
te emorandum was made several years after, during another
envy of ordering out some ships of war with supplies for the
voyage, he had no right to refer to it. He had only a right to re- relief of the homeward-bound 'Trade, which may be prevented
fr,:sh his memory from the facts recorded by him at that time. from getting into port by the north-easterly wind ;I am eons-
- Lord LANSDOW N said, the %witness held, not the original tnaudid.h their •. •
I.orumips to acquaint you, for the information
memorandum, but a copy, which, for some reason, he found of the Committee,y
that orders are given to the Admirals at
more convenient to bring with him. Ile (Lord Lam:town) was p th-
and Plymouth, to send out any vessels they can get
of opinion that the witness ought to be allowed to refresh his °raimels
at for the above purpose.—l am, Sir, your very humble servant,
memory from that copy. The question was not, whether it (Signed) " JOHN BARROW."
should be received as evidence? but whether the copy, being in
his possession, afforded him the best means of refreshing his His Majesty's allip 81411104 Captain MatitTAT, fitting for
memory ? foreign service, sailed from Portsmouth yesterday morning,
Lord iIARROWDY complained that he could not hear din- with supplies for the numerous homeward-bound vessels which
thistly the answers given by the witness. He might, therefore, are no doubt at the entrance of the Channel, detained by con-
perhaps, have misunderstood him. He understood the witness tear/ wind*, and with orders to cruize till the wind becomes
to say, that he had lett the original memorandum behind him in fair for their arrival.
Sicily, and had yet taken a copy on his voyage homewards ! The William, M'CADDAM, from Liverpool to Riga, which
(Criet o.f No, no; leder ! ) was driven on shore on the 23d alt. on the coast of Jutland,
The LORD CHANCRLI.OR read the following passage • and abandoned by the crew, was got off previouseo the 48th,
from Phillipps's Lag
Evidence—" To assist his memory, a by some people from the Sew, after landing the cargo there.
wittrps may'use a written entry in a book, or a memorandum, i and pmeeed for Aalberg.
or a copy of a memorandum, such entry or memorandum hay- ! The Margaret, Corns, from Newcastle for eialberg, struck
log been made at the time when the fact occurred, or inimedi- on a reef of rocks, on the 27th ult. near the.Scaw ; but was got
awl), afterwards."—Therefore, if the witness swore that the ori- off next morning, and proceeded on her voyage.
ginal memorandum was made at the time, and that what he em_ I The Mount man of war and thelkanicaravax frigate we
pleped was mum accurate copy of the original, it seemed to him rived at the Cape of Good Hope on the 25th of July, from
that it might be used to refresh his memory. Bombay, and were to sail in four or five days for
England.
Lord REY said, the easiest and most simple way was to !. The Magnet, Geawome from Bristol to Philadelphia, put into
call on the witness, and to ask him as to the nature of the paper Cork en the 26th ult. having sprung a leak, and is discharging.
be held in his hand. If it should appear that he made an entry The Sea Nymph, JACOBS, from Cape Coast Castle to Loudon,
it the time, and that the paper was a true and faithful copy of teen
ut into the bland' of rrinces in disuesa, and lealiTl soilhas
tbatmeinoranduts, no doubt could refresh his memory from it. condemned.
-1,00 lIARK OW BY suggested; ed UAL p* the ' The 141401 k! 447 M km* J-0) 415100; 11t Yalu+ the
. . ...... .

How do you know?—Because I have had frequent occasions
to go to pay my respects to her Majesty.
Were these the only occasions on which you saw him in bed?
—They were.
Did her Royal Highness sleep below during the whole of the
voyage from is to Jaffa?—l believe she did.
When you went to pay your respects to ha Majesty, where
was she 2—ln her own room.

•In her deeping-room?—Yes.
Was she in bed?—No, she wu lying on a ads.
Was she dressed or not?—She was dressed.

Was Bergami on those occasions in bed ?—He was.
Did he speak to you don't recollect the particulars. As
I passed he used to say '° Good day."
What kind was his bed?—l believe it was an iron bedstawl.
Was it a fixture ?—No, it was lashed to the side of the vessel.

Do you mean to say that when the door was left open, a per-
son in the bed of her Royal Highness could not be seen by a
person in Bergami's bed ?—I should think not.
Now you only think ; did you ever stand in ,a position so as
to see whether it could be so or not ?—No, I never did.
Was it your duty to attend on her Royal Highness?—No;
when I was called on I went; I never went without being sent
for. I often went there to dinner, but never without having
been called on.

Who used to call you ?—From the deck, the sailors.
Who called you from the cabin?—The servants.
When called on, used you always to go ?—Yes, when called
on, but never of my own accord.
Did this happen frequently ?-1070.
Once, or more?—More than once.
Under the tent was there a sofa 7—Yes, there was a sofa
and a bed.

Whose bed ?—I believe a bed that was put up for young Austin.
Who slept In that bed ?—I do not know. ,
Do you mean to say that the Princess slept In that bed ?—No,
she slept on the sofa, not on the bed.
How near was the sofa to the bed?—Them was a distance of
three or four yards between them.
Do you mean to say that there was an interval of space of
three or four yards from the bed to the sofa?—From the ewe.
mitles of both there was a greater distance; there were more
than two yards between the nearest part of the sofa and the
nearest pan of the bed.
How do you know that her Majesty slept on the sofa ?—Be-
cause I saw her lying on the sofa at night.
Was that the wily reason ?—lt was.
Who slept in the bed ?—I do not know.
For what purpose was it placed there?—The people sat on It
during the day.
Do you mean to say, that that was the only occasion yen saw
it osed for?—l cannot state any other purpose.
Did you ever see any perion sleep there?—Never.
Did you ever see Bergami in the bed ?—I saw him sit on it
in the day time.
Have you any doubt but that he slept in that bed on the voy-
age from Jaffa to Syracuse 7—l cannot say.
Have you any doubt of it?—l doubt that he did.
Did he sleep there at all?—I cannot say, for I never saw bini
there.

Do you mean to say that you doubt it ?—I have every puce
to doubt that be slept there.
Do you mean to say that you believe .he did not sleep there?
—I do not believe that he slept there; I never saw him there.
Did he sleep in the cabin I—l cannot say whether he slept
there or not; I had other duties to attend to; I bad the com-
mand of the ship, and the sare of the navigation of it.
Did Bergami lie on the bed in the tent during the day time?
—No; I never saw him there.
Have you any doubt but that Bergami slept on that bed until
the last day of the veyage?—l can't say where he slept ; I never
went after him to see where he slept ; I had other duties to at-
teed to; I never saw him in bed.

Do you mean to say that you never saw Bergami lying under
the tent do not recollect ever seeing him there.
Do you mean to say, upon your oath, that you did net see
Bergami lying under the tent by day or night ?—I can only say
that I have no recollection of seeing him lying there.
When you seal of the night, was it dark or light?—lt was
dark.

What countryman are you 7.--I was born in England, but am
partly Irish.
You did not then see Bergami there on a dark night 7—All I
meant was, that the night was dark, but there was light enough
in the binnacle to see who was under the tent.

Do you mean to swear, that during the month you were on
board, you never saw ergami lying under the tent I—l do
swear that I have seen him sitting there, bat never lying down.
Do you remember the night of the storm, when the Princess
went down into the cabin to sleep ?—I do.
Where did Bergami sleep on that night ?—I do not know.
Was he in the room adjoining that in which the Princess
slept ?—He was not.
When you were in the steerage, could you hear a voice from
the tent ?—lf the weather was stormy, it was necessary for the
Princess to lift up the canvass of the tent when her Royal High-
ness wished to call to me, otherwise I could not hear her.

Earl GREY, it being a quarter past four o'clock, moved an
adjournment, there appearing no probability of the cross-exami-
nation being finished within a reasonable time.
The SOLICITOZ-GENERAL expressed a wish that he might not
be restricted, in point of time, with regard to the cross-ezaml-
nation.—Adjourned till to-morrow (this day) at ten o'clock.

NAVAL INTELLIGENCE.