Star.
London, England, 1818-03-21 00:00:00

Jerome for the office of the Sinkin

the Westphalian creditors consider ;.s
their claims, they intend to apply tc
against

Yesterday be!ng Good Friday, the E
Public OiEces, shops, &c. throughout ti
were closed, business st.spendecl, and tl;
ligious worship opened, the same as ~n
The Earl of Livcaroot. had an ani
PRINCE Rcomi-r yesteruay at Carlton I
Yesterday the Duke of bout;
R rowr.

The Duke of Lea left Wilitehall
liornby Castle.
Her Grace the Duchess of LEEDS h
same day for Reath.
The Duke of Kesr, in his lart lene,
sels, said that he should visit Loudon
instant (this day).
The Earl of IVESTUORLAND leaves A
day on a tour.
Thursday evening the Prince of firs
accompanied by Baron ONAottrav,
Duke and Duchess of CVNIBrRLAND,
dente, near St. James's Palace, when,
select party to meet his Serene Highne
being Goiid Friday, his Serehe
by Baron O'NAGIITEN, went to =cr.!
at the Reformed Lutheran German t.h.
tin's-lane, Cannon-street. iif:enrzr.:
Highness rode oat or. 11,:rseback.
nvss received visits from ',III:
Earl BATuvase, the Ea:l of LivEßrow..
FORD, Lord ST. FTELENS, 111.tjor Purr'

The Ambassador from &c
LA Ds entertained a iarge
Thuriday at his Ilnuse,

We arc told in a pa. agrap
ball, at• Edinburgh, t
crowded that...x.2 danciim was ette.
-Tlie success of Bluegeard,. Cii
Sleeping Beauty, hbve induced
Covent'Garden to bring forward anoth
stAutT's beautiful little Fairy Tales : ri
quis de Combas, or Me Master Cat," is
for the good Easter holiday Mts. C
Puss, and LISTON and EMERY the Mil

A General Meeting of the Members _
for propagating the Gospel in Foregn
held on Wednesday at St. Martin's Librsry Ile
Archbishop of CANTERBURY in the Chair..—T_:a
were also present—
The Bi;hops of London, Salisbury, Chester, Lar.i.OF.
rester, and Quebec; Lord Kenyon; the Rey. Dcc!,,rs
den, Must, and Shakleford; the Archdeacons of Londn
Middlesex; the Rev. G. Doyley, and the RtV. T. Walt. i;
Mr. Gipps, M. P. Messrs. J. Watson, Atcheson,
5,..-eral other Clergymen and Gentlemen.
THE NEW IMPROVEMEATL—In three or fe1n.....1
the only house remaining to obstruct the view fm
Carlton-House to Piccadilly, will disappear. Ers
than a week St. James's Market, with all is -...rce
dages, will also be gone, " leaving rct a wrec.::::(-
hind." -The noble houses on the East side, Lar
those from Jermyn-street to Piccadilly, are
ward state ; their elevation is complete;
The workmen are now employed, at tLc
House, in embellishing the interior ti--
the front, still being in an unfinished ttze,
posed to public inspection.

.ar sc:p:a,::i

Gaosiexon-Hoi,sz.--This magniscent elEct is
undergoing further improvements. W',...;:x.ea
now employed in erecting a noble gi111,7 r-
ception of the superb collection (.1' plctt.r.
Noble Lord has scattered among his
dowers. The furniture, although uncoil:n;(11y *Nc.
tWal and nearly new, will have many acress!cr.: cre
the period when it will be opened to d:v
Norl.l, which some say will net be tiil May ntra
Exnustt IFAMMONABLES IN PA lIIS.-11:e DCO4
WELLIMOTOk, on St. Patrick's Da gave a
sumptuous dinner at the ('atfra.,-131..%,
famous Tavern in the Boulevards 61
The party invited consisted of 41 loa,iing
all of whom were Irish. The entertinnier.t
ordered a week previously. The "Hrn.
BRADSHAW undertook to supei iatead, tof
Mr. Moone, of Dutlin. Arno.ig the par:y iry4
personally by the •I)uke, ware lari
Colonel WATSON, General Sir 1::,n-.tan
Colonel HAMILTON, &c. It was, of coarse... 3.;
day.—The Viscountess GALWAY entertains•d
party at her hotel on the 14th instant: the r'
be afaremell : her Ladyship intends to v:
in May next.—But the gayest of t::o p-
rate letter) " is our friend CAVE •
he and his Lady give elegant pa:,
day night."
A letter dated Philadelphia, February le,.
'• We learn from Washington that r';
Con:n,"
Don Vincent Pazos, from Florida, c:: ;Le t.
Independent Governments of Scath
•I
rived at that place and addresse;.
Executive, against thei oppressive acts to %%Ilk..
have been subjected by authority °four (ievaarect:
We presume this complaint will be laid before Con'
greys in due tirr.c."

.l
,: lm:-'3

•

ties cvery Wei:::

;i !t'tl

I

TIIE PRINCESS OF WALES.

We lately mentioned in our report o' the proceed.. I
iuzs in the Court co; Cha .eery, that her Royal High-
s the PRINCES of WALES had filed a Bill against
ee Earl of LIVERPOOL and Count MUNSTER as Exe-
cors of the late Duke of BRUNSWICK, brother of
Royal Highness, claiming repayment of 15,0001.
.el to have been leat by her o the Duke in the
'nth of Aug
1814, and to have been secured
y three different written engagements from the
Duke (two of the engagements being deposited at
Courts's °dice), and that Lord LIVERPOOL and
count MussTER made an application to the Loan
CHANCELLOR, that the Princess of Ws.t.gs should be
compelled to produce the third instrument before
the, „os.vereci the bill. The Loan CHANCELLOR
called open Count MuNsrza to make an affidavit,
eating his reasons why this instrument should be
produced before the bill was answered ; and, in con-
wise:lce of the affidavit made by Count MUNSTER
you that occasion, the LORD CHANCELLOR, on
DsJay last, made an order that the Princess of
WALES should produce the instrument.
The Affidavit is of such a complexion that, from
iiicacy, we should have forborne to publish it, in
the .esent state of the business, had it come before
: any other way than it has done—in the columns
Morning Paper, and accompanied with an insi-
vi ion which ought, for the credit of the purity
sitli which justice is administered in our Courts of
La v, to be repelled the moment it is brought forth.
We ask not how the Paper referred to obtained the
c3py of th, raid Affidavit, which we have inserted in
rtotlle column. but we cannot avoid remarking that
it to ,ads its readers that the Affidavitwas " motpub-
Ed) read ix Coarr—that " the CHANCELLOR
and ,ounsel on both sides declared, in the strongest
totns, that the case of the Princess of WALES vrat in
a Court of Justice, to be treated as the case of the
hun.blest individual,"—and that " it is certain,
du: in the case of a private individual the Affi-
davit would have been read in Court tr In the

teeth if this insinuation, we shall only remark,
it lies with the discretion of the Court whether
en affidavit shall, in the first instance, be read pub-
kir or only when it comes in course to be acted
;pa as part of the record. It is no unusual thing'
for the LORD CHANCELLOR to save the time of the
Court. by taking papers with him to peruse at home;
espe:ially if any motion has been made which on the
fle Li it prays for a deviation from the usual forms,
:s was :he case in the matter now before us. On
ti.'; p trt of the statement we need add no more; but
6e mot; .re of the publication alluded to may also
/.7.? another basis—at all events, it has a tendency

to in uce the Public to ejudge the question, instead
isiLiag the esukof_the action, when all the evidence
61, have beec considered by the only competent tribu-
Li: we therefore think it our dutyto caution the Public

w.,,:r.st drawing any hasty conclusion from the con-
k. 15 of ;he affidavit. No inference to the prejudice
of a Personage who could voluntarily make a sacri-
fice rf 15,000 i. a-year, freely offered by Parliament,
&aid be hastily drawn from the affidavit of even a
Hanoverian Nobleman, without every species of evi..
deuce required by our Courts of Law. In " the case
of the humblest individual," it would not be easily
credited that one who could voluntarily make such a
r.crifice, could yet endeavour to obtain a sum of less
value by questionable means. Many other things
vould be thought more credible than this—but we
forbear. The question is in proper hands, and we
doubt not will receive complete investigation;

(Core.}—lN CHANCERY,
*Mtn HR ROYAL HIGHNESS CAROLINE AUGUSTA FRINCIESS OF
isaut, IT ANTHONY DULLER ST. LEGER, DER NEXT FRIEND,
Dit/lirF ; AND ROBERT BANES EARL OF LIVERPOOL, AND
MIDI, FREDERICK HERBERT COUNT MUNSTER, DEFENDANTS.
EMIT FIEDERICK HERBERT Count MUNSTER, of Grosvenor-
phi*, in the cont,ty of Middlesex, one of the above-named De-
fenduts, tnaketh oath, and said', that he bath been informed
alai el/eves that in or about the latter end of the year 1816 her
P.,71 Highness the Princess of WALES sent the Right Honour-
.. - _

isic Gloms Callum, one of the Executors named in the
bdl of the late Duke of Baustswies (but who bath not proved
for WO), two Instruments in. writing, one in the German lan-
rye and one in the French language, both dated on the 24th
r. of August, 1214, purporting to be to the same effect, and to
e rineraents oa the part of the late Duke of Batinswicx, to
: pay to her Royal Highness the Princess of Wain, in two
!ors, with interest, the sum of 15,0001. sterling, therein stated to
le leut by her Royal Highness to the Duke of BLVIIEWICE and
...fit deponent farther saith, he bath been informed and believes
v. the a:Ad two instruments were deposited by Mr. CANIaNa
vith 11eurs. Courts and Co. bankers, in the Strand ; and this
Picea saith, that on the 7th day of February, 1818, this de-
itlett attended the said Messrs. COOTIE and Co. and there were
a present Mr. Comma and Mr. Le BLANC, the Solicitor of
cteionent, and the Earl of LIVERPOOL, a party in this suit,
MP. BIICKIONAII, and several other Gentlemen, who ap-
;toed to this deponent to attend with him, but who are not
kavn to this deponent. And this deponent pith, that Mr. Coure
tto producel the said two instruments, and they were or. that
rtniar, inspected by this deponent, and several of the other
'%:s present. And this deponent with, that he had for many
yrevi4.us to the late Duke of Ettunswice's death been
cu,t r.th his eonEttenee, and bad been in habits of conti-
t.-e. -.nres?ozence with him, and wag inthtuttely acquainted
t rh,nr.cr of writing, both in the German and in the
..rrage, and has in his possession a great number of
st papers in hat'a languages, written the said
.; ard thus depahent too!. with Lim to t'
or.e o...min letter and on;
td late Dzke, for the purpo:e Of comparing

..:J 1 Ling

'.ettca

dq-,mvit futthsr cdth, that the said written instrs-
Lrrn.ui Loigaaze appeared to this depnnent, upon
.:•.--von nth ti said Carman leattsr, writtLa by the
Lae, to be a:: inspesket resernblen:: of :Ls hand--a-rita
ra,d rd that mast the sr Ilizz nor the coo.

instrument.

sfrietion of the said written inateltrint were equal to the mm-
r.er of the said late Duke, who well undnlood and wrote the
German language, which was his own vernacular language. and
especially that there were certain expression' in the said written
instrument which were unmeaning, and absurd in the German
language, and which appeared to this deponent to be bor-
rowed from the Englids idiom—thus t the German word " auf"
is used in the said instrument as equivalent to the English
word " of" which has nearly the same sound, whereas the
German word " auf " signifies " upon," and thus instead of
speaking of a sum " of" fifteen thousand pounds, the instru-
ment when translated speaks of a sum " upon" 15,000/. and
instead " of" Duke of BMTKSTIICI, it speaks of Duke " upon"
Brunswick; and instead of the month " of" August, speaks of
the month " upon" August; and the Christian name of the
late Duke in the sizitaturo is misspelt, and different from his
habit of writing, being " liVti.xtuat" instead of " Virnmetar,"
and the same is signed Dem:melee ET D'Oms, which signature
or the signature Baonswicx Oats, the late Duke did adopt
during the time he was dispossessed or his Dominions by
the French, but this deponent believes be did not use it after his
return to his dominions in the autumn of the year 1813. And
this deponent further saith, that the said written instrument in
the French language appeared to this deponent upon comparison
with the French letter of the said Duke to be also an imperfect
retemblanee of the hand writing of the said letter, and that the
construction of the said written instrument dii not appear to be
equal to the manner of the said late Duke of Bier.su um in writ-
ing French; and that the signature of else said instrument was
also Bans:twice xr D'Oets, which this deponent believes as afore-
said, the late Duke was not in the habit of using when the said
instt uments bear date ; and this deponent further saith, that her
said Royal Highness bath in her said bill filed against the Earl
of Livearoot and this deponent, founded her claim upon the
said written instrument in the French language for the re-
payment of 15,0001. sterling ; and also upon another instru-
ment in the French language, of the same date, for the re-
payment of 15,000 Louis de France ; and this deponent is in-
formed and believes, that in the month of April, 1817, her
Royal Highness caused the said latter instrument to be produced
for payment in Brunswick ; and this deponent is advised and
verily believes, that previous to putting in his answer to the said
Bill it is necessary, in order that his answer may fully meet the
case, that he should have the inspection of the said last-men-
tioned insttument. 7.) MUNSTER..
Sworn at my Chambers, 110111thampton-buildings,
the 13th March, 1818, before me, S. Hasvux.

r2ge and
iveri f Au
eroi4gr
'PY to
?en, wit
kleut bl
sj Lpui
U. tie s:
with Itki
iticeut
icert att
pass
ocion
1,4 zlaa
"itt:td to
kawn tot
, 442 Froth
truaar, i
pr
Ra pre
L co,d.
I
r
!! ...
i•-•4c I
cf