Star.
London, England, 1818-06-27 00:00:00

WESTMLVRTER ELEC'TION.

Last night. at ten o'clock, Sir Guilin. &ma I
declared .to Sir MURRAY MAYWILLL'S Committee,
that the health of the gallant Captain had fortunately
undergone such an alteration since the morning, as
.not to require the publication of a Bulletin. On Sir
Gitarnr's retiring from thp Committee-room to his
carriage, some wretches pelted him with mud.

The proceedings on the Hustings at Covent Gar-
den were more niteresting yesterday than they have
been since the commencement of the Election : there
Were present the Marquis of TAVISTOCK, Lord MoNT-
FORT, the Hon. Mr. Ilixxxer, Mr. WILLIAM SMITH,
M.P. Mr. Bvio, one of the Members for Middlesex,
and several other Gentlemen of high respectability.
The State of the poll was announced at four o'clock,
' tisual:

Sir Samuel Hominy
Sir Franck Burdett
Sir Murray Maxwell
Mx. Hunt
Mr. KIWXATRD intreated the people, for the sake
of their own cause, to give a patient hearing to the
Gentleman who was to address them on the part of
Sir Murray Maxwell; for they were as yet ignorant
of the grounds on which that Gentleman asked them
for their vote. For himself, he confessed this was an
object of curiosity, being altogether unable to con-
ceive on what grounds he could appeal to their un-
derstandings. The only other title which the Gentle-
man who was to address them on the part of Sir
Murray _Maxwell had to their attention, was, that he
W:li an entire stranger to them, and therefore be aver
entitled to their courtesy.
Mr. Ettts then stepped forward, and observed,
that he was happy rte same opportunity was afforded
to him for addressing them which he had obtained
yesterday, and lie gladly remitted thanks for the
courtesy of the Gentleman who entertained such dif-
ferent principles from himself, who last addressed
them. lie was indeed a straftger to them ; but hos-
pitality and kindness to strangers were characteristic
of the let itish Nation. His only object in wishing to
address them was to communicate to them the state
of Sir Murray Maxwell's health. Ile was sorry to
say, it was not improved. As to the mode in which
he was attacked, he would not say one word, as he
was convinced there was but one opinion on the sub-
ject. He had been asked to state the grounds on
' which their votes were solicited by Sir Mnrrav Max-
: well. Thaugh his tams were inadequate tp "do jus-
tice to such a subject, challenged as he thus was, he
would net hesitate to state to them shortly what these
grounds were. He had :been first induced to offer
himself co dee notice of the Electors of Westminster
by the solicitation of a certain nuaiher amongst them
(•' Ar, aye!
.er. nr Lnril Cadlerragh and Co many.")
He was now statine that of which he was firmly con-
vince le—he was fi.st induced to present himself to
their notice in coa;equence of that solicitation, not
from any overwee sing opinion of his- own tallnits, hut
from a sincere and deep-felt regard for our glorious
Constitution, and from an ardent desire todefend the
sacred rights .of that Constitution; for be declared
he would not held fellowship with that man whir
thought traitorously towards the Constitution. Sir
'lurray Maxwell w.ts also induced to offer himself
to the notice of the Electors of Westminster, lions a
knewlealge that it had leag bete' their practice to
choose one of their Representatives froTh the Kano-
sion to which he belonged_(., Aye! Ina of die?rent
principles.") In that profession, Sir Murray had al-
ways distinguished himself; and there was no part of
his professional career that would not challenge the
strictest inquiry, and that did not justly entitle him
to the approbation of his Sovereign and his country.
These were the grounds or. which he presented him-
self to their.notice. Though net of the same opinion
with some of the other Caodidates on the subject of
suffrage and the duration of Parliameets, he yet,
thought that [het was no reason why he should not
present himself belote them. It was well known,
that there were many persons, not only in Wt.-small-
ster, but throughout the country, who deprecated
tiny alteration of the present forrwand constiottion of
Parliament; and as the advocates of Parliamentary
Reform professed to wish to carry their point by no
other means than Parliamentary deliberation, he very
newt ally thought, that his being an opponent of Par-
lianientary Reterm was no suiliarint reason for his
declining the suffrages of those of the Electors who
were alse friends to Parliament as at present consti-
tuted. These were tl-e seatiment of Sir Murray Max-
well—and how had he acted? Ila challenged any
of his opponents to say that he had not been nail:nen,
moderate, conciaating, and ge.elemanly in his con-
duct and is his language. In it oplaion, hehad not
acted wrong in the first instance, ir. offering himself
to their notice, and he approved of :he mode in which
he had conducted the canvass. Ile would ran ela-
trude longer on their notice, bat conclude with ea-
pressing that Sir Murray Maxwell was deter:id:led
to hold out to the last, and to apaear personally on
the hustings as soon as he should be able to do so.—
(Great appinioe.)
Mr. Dnuea next stepped forward amidst uriversal
cheering. The efforts, he said, allisal he had already
made had so exhausted his streneth. that he had
hardly power to address them that evening, and
therefore he hoped for their induleence, if he should'
not do justice to the cause in behalf of which he spoke.
The state of the poll this day was ominous of their
succes'. They had before-hand looked on this day
as their weakest day; but it appeared that they were
more powerful in their weakness even than then ene-
my : to. morrow and Monday would decide the poll.
(a No such thing," from a Gr.)7Yenten of Sir alfaeaee
Afeewrifspartaaa To-morrow, he trust.. 1, such rein-
forcements would arrive from all quarters in support
of their favourite representative, Sit Francis Burdett,
who had been the uniform advocate of the liberties
and independence of his countrymen, as would plane
him at the head of the poll—(applause.) Mi. Bruce
had one or two observations to make to them on
certain proceedings which had taken place in the
course of this contest, and which were certainly a
novelty there. They knew why Sir Francis Burdett
did not appear on the Hustings. lie was not a Can-
didate fur their suffrages, but had been brought for-
ward by the Electors of Westminster, because he was.
a tried man. His not appealing on the Hustings, and
his nc. canvassing for their suffrages, did not arise
from axe disrespect,- or want of gratitude towards
them. He had declined appearing here, because he
did not wish to violate his principles. lie well knew

3655
5183
3146

the elevation of Sir Francis Burdett's principles, and
he knew that, proud as Sir Francis justly was of the,
honour of being their Representative, he would ra-!•
• they renounce that honour, than sacs ifice any of these:,
principles—(appiatise). He wished now to address,
to them a few words, as to the conduct of the fol-
lowers of Sir Samuel Romilly ; but in doing so he
had too great a respect for himself to say any thing
disrespectful of Sir Samuel Romilly. He was a
man distinguished for his wisdom, his virtue, and his I
learning, and he had certainly great claims on the
Electors of Westminster. But he was to be consi-
dered a Candidate on this occasion; and it would
have been but shewing a due respect to them, if he
made his principles and character known to them—
tkere is no occasion," from a Ger:at:won on tLe
Hustivil. He had no 'doubt, that as a man of
virtue and learning, they would have derived great
benefit from his attendance on these Hustings.—
Every person who came fin-ward as a Candidate,
should be in immediate communication with those
who had to elect him. lint of Sir Samuel Romilly,
it might he said that he was like the Angels—they
heard a greef deal of him, but they never saw him
(applauscs). —Hitherto no person, had made any ob-
servations on what took place during the last Par-
liament; and it might now oe necessery to consider
what were the acts of that must corrupt and profli-
gate Parliament that ever disgraced the history of
this country. After a long, bloody, and expensive
war, which plunged the anion in great (listless, the
people found themselves loaded with a debt of nearly
a thousand millions. Feeling themselves oppressed
with taxes, and anxious that all abuses should be re•
'formed, they wish that a system of Retrenchment
and Reform should be acted on, and above all, they
were anxious that a Helot m should take place in the
Commons House of Parliament. What answers were
made to their petitions? Were they treated with respect':
The answer thee received was the Suspension of the
Habeas Corpus Act, and the Gagging Iii 11—(" So rl
trey.")—An attack was even swede on die Liberty of
the Press, which Was considered the greatest palhe
diem of their libuties. Was there any necessity fur
these me tsures?—(e No.“)—But they saw there was
a grossing feeling for Beforfn ; they hsi4ed to de-
serov doe feeling, and therefore they suspended their
liberties. Innocent men were then sent into dun-
geons, 'where they could not see the light of the sun,
and where they were not allowed to see the faces of
any of their family. To justify these tyrannical acts, ,
what did Ministry: do ? They employed spies and
informers, whom they sent through the country.—
Whet was the result of these measures? , They did
excite a sort of tumult in Ile c ntry. A few im-1
ptudent men were led to enter into measures, for,
which they expiated by their lives, he would not say
their crimes, but the imprudent acts to which they
were inst;gated. In former tildes of our histor.y,,
what was the language held by great raen—what
was the language held by Mr. Fox, whose memory
was revered by them, :Is having been tweety-eight
nears Reprveatative for the (..sty cf Westminster?
What we. his language? Was it not his language,
that whoa Ministers proposed similes measures, they
eught to L. resisted ?—that i; to sae, that resistance
was that a question of toe, bat of prudence—Op-
' .e.'euse.)—lf the punishment hid fallen on the really
„eut%y, it ought to have fallen on Ministers them-
selves—on Lord Sidmoteli and Lord Castlereagh—
e they were the guilty pe. sons(.lridausee)--The •
suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act was said to be
a temporary measure, justified by necessity; but
• how was that necessity afterwards proved? What
was the justification set up in Patliament when it
came to be discussed?—lt was ridicule. One of the
most dreadful instances of sutferiag which had taken
place under the Act was selected for satire and suer-
.riment by one who, though unfortunately for the
Country he was a Ninister, deserved rather to be
described as the Merry Andrew of the State—(Leud
lankter.)--The people never should tie-get the name
of Ogden—, beet atpla:iscs) s—they should have a
starling taught to repeat his name—(.4pideuse.)—
They never should forget that ore of the present
Mi-
nis:ers had contemplated the sufferings of humanity
as a fit select to employ the eeercise of his jocular
disposition. e The severed and ruptured Ogden,"
was surely an espressioe which, particularly under
the circumstances in which it was essel, would have
roused the in.fignaticu and ehhorrenee of any assem-
bly but that of the flow.: of Commons—(Loud ap-
-11.tuie).-11 the people of Westminster succeeded in
:his contest, they would acquire more honour than
ever. They were contending against the influence
of the (;down, of the Aristocracy, and of die Church ;
but in siete of all the etforts of Princes of the Blood ;
in spite of all the efforts of a haughty Aristocracy;
in spite of smooth,. faced Courtiers, w-ho were blown
into existence by the breads of sovereignty: and ex-
tingitished with as much facility by its frown ; in
spite of Archbishops and Bishops, and Deans and
Deacons, aye, down to the very Clerk who says
" Anjen"--(l.nuil anti ewainsudlhuithlcr)—ia spite of
11 tisis congregation of Government supporters, Tic
had no doubt but that the people would prove true
to tgemeelves, and to him who was identified with
thcm—(Ltatd applause).—lle relied upon that spirit
winch had made %Vestminster what it is--upon that
bold •ind liberal spirit which had made England the
wonder of the world, for the success of the present
contest. llis whole reliance was there, and to that
trusted for their prompt exertions to-morrow, when
he hoped that they would prove their zeal by giving
Sir Francis Burdett plum pers—V.ead apidausel.
Mr. WISHART then stepped forward, and again in
the name octhe friends of Sir Samuel Romilly, con-
gratulated them on the state of the poll, and thanked
them for the steady and successful support which
they had given to the cause of liberty. hoped
that to-morrow would put an end to the contest, la
; determining decidedly on the part of their two f-
; vourite Representatives, Sir Francis Burdett and Sir
Samuel Romilly—(loud applause). He should not
trespass any further on their attention, beceaee their
friend Mr. Rennet, their well known adfocate in the
Hou-se of Commons, was prevent, and had a few
words to address to them. :The announcement of
. Mr: Bennet's name was received with site greatest en-
, thusiasm by the Meeting, and it was some time.be-
s tisre be could proceed to speak, in coasequence of the
applause which his name and presence excited:.
The Honourable Mr. BENNZT said that he was late
; in coming amongst them ; but his heart had been
with them from the beginning of the contest —(:fp-
ipfausc.) The cause of his absence slots, that he had

his own election to carry (in--having ereo
succeeded, he now cane forward, h earPY ;l the
portimity of rto oesenting himself leo. notice fe.
applause.) His Honourable Priced, Ir. K.,
the short address which he had made to then:''L
commencement, after properly requesting t,
tention to whatever the Gentleman who
arses
the Court Candidate might have to say,
s,
challenged that Gentlemaa to state ere p
upon which Sir Murray Maxwell relied to his claims to the Representation of diet re? ' !-
dependent City. They had heard the e.,0.,".;
that challenge produced: it an:oonted
• that he was requested to do s• I •
oI ,
and some others of that
(Laughter.) That the Court Ltd nee::
and Ee could not reilise its high selOit
somewhat curious to ohser:e tae! -o
Had they brought forward cne of e
tary Champions,' one of the indir
fended them through the I..hele
quitous measures, by which the 1 to
the present Ministers were nisereks:
thew could not get a siaglc itenest r
such a Candidate—(Load
cessity of the case recommeetl
ceeding. They brought forward :; .
they dare not bring forward the cid
forward a man of good clettart,
profession, of gallant service..
tunately for the country he s!
go into Parliament to supreit the.
tail upon the country, as tar as ire
lamity of their misgovermeent.
seat capacity, the creature of co: -- eot,
he, in his Parliamentary capacitoo
defender—a-owl applame.)
lie thought it impooible that se,h 4.
leippen. His opinion of that peat
teas an ir.haLitant and an F. hoar,
to a bad opinion, if he loon.: that i do. •
their past experience, and the
had made fir themselves, they co.:ti • .
apostacy of retureing a Court Can.ll.l ..•
men% Ile had ene word to say upon -.; ... • .
from his friend, Mr. Bruce, respecti:o7 tle !..
Sir tOsinuel Bomilly. For .tor. Brace he coo!.
very high respect ; he had the rico:toe tn. :
qteiintance for aslong :tad ti.e (-f •ee • .
acquaintance was to raise him Moil is his CS:;7.I.
as a genuine friend to freedom ; but ti e ..1.,
knew him themselves,• and therefOre he nos! ... •
more. As for the absence of eir
he justified it upon this ground, that I.e •,..e
cisely in the same situation 1S Sir fret..O
1 (loud and coa:i,need apiketat).-11-2 Lehi p,
his hand, which lie himself had sin eed.
others, calling on hint to authoilse nerei.oe
l a Candidate, and requesting him also t•,
his valuable tie to be wasted, and I.li !no
duties to society interfered with lac a ;les,
teetlaoce on the Hustings. He ceeht
meeting, that Sir Samuel P.omirlr v.... 2t
ment advocating the cause of the roe, •,•
where of all others they warted ...e i• t
humane, disinterested, enlightened, ao! ..b.
the Court of Chancery—Void
man could ever complain t I hevieg her:. ;
from his door, because he had rot the:ewe:ye.
to delivor to his clerk ; in Lis professional, we
in his Parliamentar, conduct, he was the trito
the people, of justice, of humanity, and the re.
of every thing that was illiberal, unjust, and oo
, sive. Sir Francis Burdett was sail to have he
known and tried man—he was so. The individeel •
then addressed them, was aware that he Iv.; u
for he had fought with li:nr side by side v
tare agaitot corruption. But this comprineft o'
not be made at the expense of Sir Sorov: Rea:;.
he also was a ti lel man—an etpielif trio! raise
(loud applanz.e).—There was no strugle too te;
for him to embark in—no cause too rainete—ro
dividual too humble to command his Les:
against oppression—no minority too small to b
the sanction of his name,• when the cause frai
grity and independence to recommend le Ile
himself one of a minority of five, who !rid o
against a Bill for disarming the people in those
tricts which were called discoutented, bat
might be more properly described as starving tfier
in that minority of live was thenameof Sir S. ]neon
Agaira, he had supported the cause of the poll:
voting against the Corn Bill ; on another core
lie resisted the Suspeasion of t!e
Act, and the atrocities s spreno from the
ploy tome of Spies and Li.formere. lie had so
and voted with the people upon all orea,io;:c.
no man could be more active, or snore eie.!. t...
Samuel Romilly ; his character and ton.!, s; •
known to all the world, and were in crei y
entitled to compare with those of the Leo and jet
man that over filled a place in a popular asscie •
(loud app.'anse.)—l le had no hesitation in say.o
if he (Mr. Bennet) had every success in mitt:
the sufferings of his le:low-crea he had te.
by following the track which the tramples t:
Fox. Mr. Whitbread. and Sir Samuel Remo
marked out fer his imitation. Of these „t ‘..:
of human nature unfortunately there o Late:•,..
maining, and the Electors of West.einster
thank Goo for the opportneii thee era- e.
returning into Parliament. as their ficier.oeloA
a man whose whole life atiorded one co:i.e.:le!
of Panegyric—(Loml and li'i,:: continucel eppl:tu,
Ile would say one word, before he concledeJ,
the last expression of :Mr. Bruce, who had a
them to vote plumpers for Si: Francis Bunko.
trusted in Goo that they would not do W.
li
%%ISillNi to desert their cause—if they %%Ole,' to t.
themselves and stultify their use votes, let :
come and plump for Sir Feasicis Burdett—Woe
platese, and wigs of" "I'? zee, true, tee eaz.4 base St..
gruel also").—Sir Murray Maxwell would app.
the policy, and perhaps would be inclined to.:
those who did not wiJi to vote directly for Lin.
that they would be good enough to ]:lump
Francis Burdett. But were they so mad as to O
NVould any nian from personal pique be inlet'
Orrow away one of his two votes when two
Candidates had offered, and when the in sof
preference of one to the exclusion of the other
have the effect of returning a Court COindideo
place of either—(Loa espplause).—Sir Francis
dett was always near his heart ; his p:ineiples
fixed him in theirs ; but thotioli Sir Samuel Ile
teas not known to them oet theechertor

/ 1

.t

rT

, i.. .t 1.•...b:ic and private
,i..,,,;‘.:.l••ef,i,:icatly before thc,reyes, and it was
th.ir own flak if they did not take advantage of
e exco,...nce—(Lou.?and continued applause).
-.J,. Kw;Arlo then stepped forward, and said it
alw.tys hcc;-, a principle with him to avow openly
the grounds upon which he acted. He
ta;:e the bull by the horns, and meet the
brought against him as promptly as it was
;le IV'lti -me of these who had asked them to!
,'nmpers in favour of Sir Francis Burdett,
1...,!•.we1ia. tell them why. He admitted and ad-
ri!_a the great exertions of gir Samuel Romilly for
t:., r.vl 01 his fellow-creatures; but regretted that
t!•-• n:tt extend as much to that larger class of
who had lost all their property through the
e,;ei of the tint‘s, as to the mort limited num-
w:to capable of litigation in the Court
GiChancety--(Dialpprobalion, and crirsaf 645, they
Ile was all along desirous to learn
fiim..!!. of Sir Samuel bomilly, what his
wers on the sohject of Parli:tmentary le4orin?
11? ;:;;::d some of Clem had come forward to satisfy
ti,: people on thi; 1imad—(.41.,.. riflaimed
" I d) It was to I,e hoped that
smne one wottY, for al yet they had no distinct ac-
Loowled:2,-.lcnt•;;lnr from LiN rris.:nd., or throagli the
Vacs, is the 0 l'ar).;--thof were still to leans
3ry Reform—
thit frienl of
" It': kit/hi it already.")
j; it, he wished them joy of their pe-
ne;r.ri.Jl which was in that instance., so much shar-
py °yin. For if Sir tiatr.tiel Romilly had ,
voted so: l'ailiamentary Reform, he (Mr. Kitmaird)
of it. A further s eaira why he thought
!..: • plump for Sir Fran:is lin:aett. was,
• lurray Maxwell's friends l.ad *limited Sir
with their vutes—(" a y. 7. and Sir Francis
?Itany voice.) It was a fact, that

t riole of the poll, sever:ern hund: ed votes
Ire pl.it wean th(• two ea tli,!.itr.bs en his right
'I he Acctors, Lid uo doubt, would
cr;.i 'al- it it da: to pia:•t, Sir Francis Burdett
it: t i in,l; it they ry:glected to do so,
be to :d hereafter, t:i.tt the cause of Re-

't lit) lengor popular—that Sir F. Burdett
vintlar: and that tlie peov.le wcrc
to the parties of V'hig and Tory. As
,r,:cuelid in t.;,.r Francis Bur-
cyt he ought to be, Or t light then make
ch:::e anoilit.r, and he sioulti have ho objection
rtelening the Member as his right tSii S.
upon comparison with the Coart''.andidate.
ro.nplaining of the conduct of Sir 51tirray
tizad3. in attributizg the assault commit-
tc I ca that tientleman to the spnorters of Sir F.
arpcared from the i-.laaards that were
t-•; i rc 2,1%: alluded to an nutratc committed by a
.:y mot% at the head of whom was Mr. Caleb
,in, as he was now called, Si, Caleb, on
person, in the course of the former
-15 happy to inform them, however, that
• • c,mmirted this outrage were disco-
-..7ee.lings were instituted against
hsr.ti bit. Murray 11airwc11's friends

. I.

L:..it r

at's,ll ~:ourse, in order that they
hi;.st k• who tbs• offenders really were, and to
1:14: rrty Car; i.e!,mgcsi. He then deprecated the
,ar,e Ccvet-..ment and several Magistrates
talm:111 the pre,tat contest, reprobating parta-
charly couthict of the latter towards publicans;
vihrn they tb!tti.e.tNi to deprive of their licences,
hi case il,e7 refti-ed to vote for the Conn Candidate.
After dweillag for some time on this roint, he con-
&led with e Owning them to increase their efforts
is favonr of Sir E Burdett, and to persevere in the
llctermitrition of placing hint at the head of the poll.
Mr. 13::a NEr came forward in explanation, and ob.
that it wits truly stated by hie Hon. Friend, I
r. X ireaird, that he had been silent respecting the
ertions of Sir Samuel Romilly in the cattle otCon-
tutional Reform. Rut why was he silent ? He was
:tut, because he knew that the people of Westmin-
e were net so ignorant of the history of that que,-
Anot to how that Sir Samuel Romilly had vote,l
7 every motion in favour of Parliamentary Reform
.x.e he had a seat in the Horse of Commons
We .lam ii," repeated from the rro•Avl4
: voted so late as last pear, and it was surprising
Kinnaird, now so great an advocate of lte-
should have fr,rgotten it--(hcar, hear,)—in fa-
of the motion which t_;lr Francis Burdett intro-
.:l47J with which, if acceded to, he (Sir Fran-
. : !:,:forrner, said he would be satisfied. It was
did aot vote for Universal Suffrage, because
concur in the conviction of its propriety.
repeated, that those who risked the loss of
from any personal considerations, aban-
::.:i cause of the independence of iVestminster,
.I,aite.l rather selfish gratification than public
app(auw.)
14m• next appeared, rather in the character
to be heard, than that of a popular
l''24*•:.. They had heard the otlier Gentlemen,
hew they disagreed O. No, it is Mr.
`a'rd ,!:?:grcva"), and he masted be would he
a74.-7CT them. Ile then proceeded in his
:actcrisec C.c. and a considerable part of the
the exercise of his lane's, and !,is
. ttang did not ss 11,1.) sli,l.e.se until

deock evonitg, after the col-
Coy. eat-Garden, V 7. I lUN l.'s
tlrawa up by the side of the Ila• • • s.;s,
was c.!: .2layed, and
• 1:: rr, and I it-NT, jun. took their
,airrounded by a
wh,; took the horses cut, anti
-:cal laying 11,11 of the rcle, and (Alters
po,:t,Ld to drag and push it
'1.4 Lrioas tate d,wn ::i..tithamptor.-street.
~..?Thicl,lla of the stroet, ott.liti, to the impe-
arb, several tAf the fvromost fell, and
follow‘d staroblei ov,2r them and fell
cca•tAita.te was, tiiey vere trampled
'•% La: raub b..nind, and the carriage being
tr.fortuna:e young
brnkon, a had his sculi
rario.ti °tit r.';(-;;:d wc.ands and
mitt had leg br0.....).;r.
.....).;r. stir 4 on, of I.lViSiGCk-
fi-rv. ds 'mute (set :lee 4.^u. •
1:i • :lito :lead the wheels
. it in a state of iaseasibility to
ctremi-! of :::,,r.ltampton-sucet, ht.
•-•••= a t.an5r0u......r.0.

:c

'44 t

,:reJ, that i
Mr. K irmard
tertions of S
t.tutional Re
becaus
to were nct
iO3, not to kr.
'emery mot
t:Ye he had
E: voted so
Mr. Kinn
should 1
of them
4-J u
did al
t crg
•41,..1 Teo
I
Cr.l
il-UXT
-x"i-n:; 16:
rzccu
o'
: • •
• :zi.
1:44 I:'e
;f T.}
f
mi
• 14(
7i.") t(
• .::
.
. • •:••,
AL,"
• 1.1
U w.
Cl
•