Star.
London, England, 1819-12-21 00:00:00


rent to the Clause enabling Special Constables
disperse a Meetin)z, in substance enacting, that
would be unlawful for them to act, unless under t

sanction of a Magistrate.
Earl BATHURST opposed the Amendment,
the ground that it would take away from the MM.
ingrtbe power which it had to redress itself.
added, that pitons attested' by them were a
guilty of a misdemeanour, not a felony.
Bart DAItNLEY objected that. the Constables
were empowered to disperse the Meeting forthwith,
without giving them the advantage of the time al.
lowed under the circumstances of its being dispersed
by the Magistrates.
After 'a few words from Earl BATHURST, the

Amendment was negatived.
Lord ELLENBOROUGH further proposed an
Amendment to the Clanse, which allowed only half
an hour fbr those qualified to attend, who remained
on the spot after Proclamation had been made. He
contended, that there was a great inequality in ex-
tending the same punishment to those
,qualified • to
attend, and those who were not so: only with the
difference of a quarter of an hour's time. lewas too
bad, that they who came there Constitutionally,
should incur the penalty of an offence of which they

were not conscious.
This was opposed by Earl BATHURST, on the
ground that a discretion was left with the Judges to
take these circumstances into their consideration, and
meived.
LoLrd ELLtNBOROUGH objected that the act of
obstruction to the Magistrate, which was made so
great an offence, was so badly defined in the clause
of the Act. He wished to give it a duration, as to
time and number of persons, to constitute an ob-
struction. With this view, he moved as an amend.
ment, that it should be by three persons at least, and
that the obstruction should continue for upwards of

ten _Minutes.
The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, That this clause
was but copied from the Act of 1796, and that it
made no change in the law, as it stands at present ; for
a Magistrate might, at the present moment. disperse
a Meeting, if he was obstructed, by force, in the
execution of a warrant, As to the time required, he
conceived it would be but a delay of justice, and

the law.
Lord ERSKINE thought a reference to the Akt
of 1796, no answer to the objection of his Noble
Friend. He would ask, if upwards of 500 freeholders
were assembled, would their Lordships male it com-
petent to one man, perhaps a spy, to make their
Meeting illegal? He again contended, that coercive
mesures would but increase the discontents of the
Pesple.—Negatived.
Lord ELLENBOROUGH again argued against
this clause, which he'contended would, if it passed,
do away entirely the right of Petition. Under the
regulations of it, a Meeting might be dispersed by
the act of one man, and it could not be again re-
assembled in less than six days. This, in the case
where a Meeting was called for the purpose of dis-
cussing a matter in progress through either House
of Parliament, if the Meeting was once dispersed,
the measure might be passed before another Meeting
could be called. His Lordship, therefore moved oJs
Amendment, that after the dispersion of a Meeting,
any one Justice might be empowered to /grant, in
writing, to a person properly qualified to make the
Requisition, liberty to the Meeting to re-assemble in
forty:eight hours after.
The Earl of LIVERPOOL had no great objection
to the Amendment, but he wished the Noble Lord
would withdraw it fin the present, and before the
third reading of the Bill, he would take it into his
consideration.

Lord HOLLAND congratulated the Committee
on even this disposition to concession on the part of
Ministers.
Lord ERSKINE was in favour of the Amend-
ment, but he did not think it went far enough. It'
appeared to him, that it was to no purpose to re-
assemble Meetings, so long as the same facilities re-
mained of dispersing them.—The Amendment was
then withdrawn.
Lord HOLLAND, net being prepared to make
any observations on the clause, indemnifying Magis-
trates for the consequences of dispersing a Meeting,
could only protest against it.
The Earl of BLESSINGTON moved-eiestpunge
the word " bludgeon' from the list of weapons pro-
hibited at Meetings.— Negatived.
The Marquis of LANSDOWN moved to except
the Surrey and Russell Institutions from the operation
of the clause against Debating Societies. He observed
that the London and Royal Institutions were ex-
pressly excepted, 'and he saw no reason for not ex-
• tending the same fanny to the others, except that the
latter were chartered.
The Earl of- LIVERPOOL said that-was the only
distinction which could be drawn. If an exception
was made in one instance, it would open the door to
applications without end.
Lord HOLLAND s'apported 'the illinendnrent.—

Negatived. .• . • . .
The Earl of BLESSINGTON said,that is there
• wait nothing in the papers on the table it alkatfecting
Ireland, it was but just to except that country from
-the operation of the Bill. He was convinced it I.oas ,
not the intention of Ministers, from the first day,to
• eatend the measures to his country, more so,• as the
name of " Barony" never once occurred in the Bill.
Perhaps this was not the Most seasonable time for
•discussing its principle, bet he could not help ob-
serving, that the clause-about obstruction to the Ma.
gistrate, Could be applied in the worst and moist
vesations way there imaginable. The Irish werea
people easily inffained, and who generally tame ca.
gether under the influence of strong feelings and
strong liquors. No' matter what the question i*
debate -was, every assembly ended there generally
by some disorder. The new power, therefore, given'
'.to Magistrates to call in the Military, in the event' of
• disturbance, would be an additional tempted**, fore
- they were already too much inclined to appeal to'
! that force. After saying that, however for meat,
• sure 'Would -or would not be applicable 'to -this.
country, it was certaiftly ill-timed in saWard ie Ire-
land, he added • that it was illibitrat te 'treat her ao,'
• when' • under all' the privations -which she enduretk.
• she kiad•ibewn so` much forbraranio hitherto. He'
expressed an intention of di'viding the Cornsaittee 'on
the Amendinent. •
The liar' teLIVERPOOIt declared that

cal meetings or . .
zmtbs very grafting to their ornedwee--i H!!"4-;
, The Earl.of DARNLEY said, it there was a-peo-,
le in the.world to be gained by conciliation, it was;
. • Irish.— One act oflciodnesi would do More than
iniiitheasures of coercion:
~.
e gar} of BLESSINGTON shaped his Artiend:-
iii-ent so as to give to the Lotd Lieutenant k disere.
-606a1 power of extending it to such parts of the
country as appeared to him to require it. ..
' -The Earl of DONOUGMORE said, it was a gra-
tuitous insult offered to Ireland.. lie was in a con-
dition to shew that the offers of co-operation held out
by the Radicals of this country had been scornfully
rejected there. It was a little too much, under these
circumstances, to treat her quite in the same way as
'this country. A Noble Lord (Castlereagh) in ano-
ther place had said the country was quite peaceable;
bin, this was anethei'proof of the sincerity of Minis-
ters, for at the same time that the Noble Lord was pre-
paring gagging measures for her, the Noble Lord
{,seemed determined, whilst he was kicking this coun-
rts7, to give his awn a slap in °solace l—( Itear).
The Earl of HAR Y ROWB spoke against the
'Amendment, and after some words from the Earl of
111Lassinoron, the Amendment was negatived with-
cut a division. . .
The Earl of BLESSINGTON wished to know
whether the hish shiklah came under the definition
Of bludgeon, in the clause prohibiting arms at Meet-
ings. He observed, it would be a • severe visitation
On his countrymen to be depriied, under any circum-
stances, of the company of an oak stick—( 4 laugh).
The LORD CHANCELLOR doubted whether
Ike Noble Loid apnlied to him for an answer—(A
leuzh).—He would rather ask what a shilelah was?
The Earl of BLESSIN. GTON did not particularly
address himself to the Noble and Learned Lord.
. The Earl of LAUDERDALE moved, .that the
Bill should definitively cease to be in opitation on'
'the Ist of March, 1825.—Negatived.
The clauses of the Bill were then agreed to; it
was reported without Amen4ment, and ordered to be
read a third time to-morrow (this day).
Adjourned at Nine o'Clock.
HOUSE OF COMMONS.
The CHANCELLOR of the ESCHEWER beneeltt up
certain Papers and Estimates relative to the coatis :wades of the
Civil List, which were ordered to be printed. He also pia-
ned his intended motion for a Vote on acoount of the sense tW
Wednesday.
Mr. PASCOE GUINFELL moved for a weekly worm of
all Bask Notes and Bank Port Bills,distinguishioe their amount,
with the amout of all Notes shove i's ; and die
amount of the whole which had been issued sines the -5d
November, till the latest period that it could be made tip t 0...—
Agreed to.
excusouast slits.
Mr. MARTIN made his motion, " That there be
laid before the House an account of all the Exche-
quer Bills which have been issued since the Ist of
September last ; specifying the rate of premium, di:-
irsssaf, mud intoioss, mod wiser% IssuCd."—A.groisa to.
MICWIPAPES STAMP SILL . i
Mt. JOHN SMltti presented a Petition from c.f.
taro Booksellers and Publishers of Works in Nuilbera.
The Honourable Gentleman said, there was no trade
in the kingdom of more impOrtancelo the morals
and happiness of the lower classes, or to tjse religion
Of the Nation at large, than that branch of the book-
selling line to which the Petitioners belonged. The
Petition stated, that they published a.great number
of works, chiefly on the subjects of divinity, or the
arts and sciences, which being set-forth in the form
of cheap periodical publications, were within the
reach of persons of small property,. who would not
be able to purchase them, if they were obliged tom
for the whole work at once; that they made a point
not to publish any works'on political subjects, nor to
allow any persons in, their employ to sell any publi-
cations but what were of a moral or religious nature,
in most instances procuring-security, by bond, froin
them to that effect; and Petitioners conceived there
was no plan better calculated, or more effectual, in
conveying instruction on these subjects to the lower
orders, than that followed by them. • They prayed,
thereforei that some provision would be made to ex-
empt works published by them in the manner above
stated, from the operation of the:Newspaper Stamp
Bill, at present in its progresi through the 110use,—
If this were not done, Petitioners stated;that above
one million of eapital employed in the boOkselling,
trade in the piiblicationof cheap Numbers, would-in-
evitably be thrown back upon those who had em-
barked in that business, besides suffering some dimi•
notion from the sudden effect of the Bill. Prom this'
statement, the Honourable Gentleman -remarked,- it
was evident, that if the Bill passed in its present
.shape, it would destroy all that, little portion of the
reeding of the poorer classes that was serviceable to
them.—Ordered to lie on the table, and be printed.
Mr. DUGDALE presented a :Petition from certain
Booksellers belonging to-Birmiu ' ' Warwick-
shire, against the Blasphemous • and" tiousLibel
'Bill; certain clauses of which they vi wed with -..e*e.%
alarm, particularly that which made it liaiiiii'inedt
for a second offence. The*Petitioners stated, that a
'great' part of their 'tuck consisted in Alms books
tett down from London, *IMO-part of which even
they bad not time to reed.
Mr:'111. A. TAYLOR said, that this-Petition spoke
`the senttments of every' Bookseller in the kingdoran
'The Petition Was ordered to' lie on the table, aid
to be' printed.
Lqrd STANLEY ptesented a Petition from an in.
dlvidual tithe naisstrof Henry Fisher, stating that he
carried en the bushiest of a bookseller, at Liverpool,
`London, arid untibus • other places In 'the United
Kingdom ;-*and that he' employed
"an immense capi-,
lid it printing eadvisblishing-books on religious and
Moral subjects, in smelt Numbers, at a cheap rate;
,tad he ares-ftatful that, if the new Measures of restric..
"'`•ot6lopnts Into laws,this capital would be idle,
be v"

~si'h!''~frddl~

JPIL
Mr. BERNAL presented a Petition from certail
Booksellers in the city of London and its neighbour-
hood, complaining of the provisions of the Blasphe-
mous and Seditious Libel Bill.
Mr. M. A. TAYLOR thought, that after the sen-
timents of a great part of the nation had already been
sent to the House, in opposition to the Libel Balt
longer period should be allowed, to give dole for fur-
ther expression of the public voice on tha•subject.—
Re was sure, that the more Petitions were heard re-
specting it, the more would-be seen the impropriety
Of passing it under' its present provisions —The Peti-
tion was laid on the table, and ordered to be printed.

sun 's.
On the Order of the Day being read, dia./louse
went into Committee of Supply ; when -
Mr. ROBE WARD moved for a rote of
0250,000, on accoont of the Ordnance Estimates.
Mr. HUME ex ted that the Hon. Gentleman
would have favou the House with a statement
why the amount of th Estimates was larger for
present year than f 4 the one preceding? In the
present state of Europe, which, we were told from
the Throne, was such as to premise a letig state of
peace, he was much at a loss to know what causes
the
there could be to increase our expenses? He ob-
served, that the cost of that department of the public
accounts was greater by £50,000 than it had been
on some former years, and that the salaries of, per-,
sons employed in that department had been dotibles4
and owes trebled ! He thought, that when the value
of money had increased in the proportion of 25 pea,
cent. that we should begin to return to a state some•
what commensurate with what it formerly was. He
hoped that before the House granted money on this
account, it would cause inquiry to be made into dr
surplus and eatravagant rate of solaria.
Mr. R. WARD said, that' the present time Was
not the most proper for going into such questions,"
the Honourable Gentleman suggested. When the
Ordnance Estimites came to be laid before the Hon"
in their fullest details, all questions of that naves,
might be discussed at large. He would only allow
himself at present to make one observation, which
was,. that the Superannuation List alone consumed
as much at present as the whole Ordnance costly'
1792, prior to the French war.---The Pots was thiii
agreed to.
The House having resumed, Mr. CALtRAFT
took occasion to ask the Noble Lord (Castlereagh),
lvitether bis Majesty's Ministers would have any ob-
jection to produce the answer which was sent to the
letter which appeared among the Papers laid before
the Home at the commencement of the Session, ad-
dressed to Lord Sidmouth, by the Manchester Ma-
gistrates, bearing date, lst July?
Lord CASTLEREAGH replied, that he should
be able to give a deSnitiVe answer to this question to-
morrow. At present he knew nothing about it.
Lord PALMERSTON moved the Order of the
Day for receiving the Report of the Committee of
Supply, which was accordingly brought up.
Mr. GRENlELL'asited a question .of the Noble
Lord (Palmerston) relative to the amount of the
charge for the "pens" of the Royal Military 'Col-
lege, and vaished•to knew whether, -as the number of
Cadets bad been reduced, the cost of the Establish-
ment would not bevlse Induced?
Lord PALMERSTON replied, that the Estimates
for the. year 11110 ewe not yet eonipletad, but he
believed be was tolerably accurate when he stated,l
that there sinuld lino iWnetien of 42,800 .in the
charge for the 'Junior Depritaant.
16. HUME nbeiready 41. t„ 4Y the •114aull's whisk
had been laid avderrildeolt.apeaared thet the 141.
Mary College sheaMaapplrthe AtenT.w4h:Oireeene
at the rate of gait .44101/4Cir" eels mail hap the
fact was, that,- driag she :lag three yens, -only
seventy•eirsbedleessisniiplie4 islket Zokaioliek!
ment. The eareparao "if this teneirtbat isnaxel
the expenses Winn, Month. 10111 *• 4300(10_01 ilea
been entered in the Jotnende of site Ittreal iIIPIRSII
out that. emery one of tbesefarmen.erhotati jsinersi'
the Army had cost CLOW to tbe.uoliOntpi - t ,
Lord PALMERSTON daelined eatedag jaws
elhweasinn of thivillPOS'ent the present tune ;'bet. he.
stedi-underiakX ..o' sat, that the Meneagatlesea,4s
reasimars -were iscoriOdt• and when be mew* ilis-'
cute Ile details of the liatabledententeon'inonel4o.'

_
riod, be was- melte would sisserdsma be spie
Mr. HUMEmid, thistle head/swigs rnateMINNS
from the B,epiate. of_ thin Srnaliiihiarntio Aid he would
-pledge himself •to sheer- WO **rect. • '
The Shipment the Coinaiitteie was*ES: *greed to.
• NSW/PAPER STAMP 00/1110 RILE.
The Order of the papier a Censinittee of the.
House on she Newspaper Stamp Duties Bill western&
• Mr. MACDONALD rose and- saidohat with re-
-spectio those kills, for he would class the Bill at
present before the Howse -and the Libel. Bill together,
he did not slink 'tholsiane objection applied, width
had been atiged against many of the former ma-
awes of the-Sable-Lard opposite, via. that it was
unintelligible; they appeased to him but too ittlaliit
V.gible; they appeased .to Wise but too obvious ta hi{
,most decided stabs at the rights and ewivilegss4
Englishmen. Melody estrrhich their
• don was suppirnted,vies, that the staining laws
insufficient for the necessities of the tunes. Thai
those laws, which. in times of civil *discord and at 4
Union. bad been found sufficient to carry the .cernoi
try and the Constitution safe and unimpaired *mg*
all the dangers which threatened them—that had
been adequate to carry as through that awful period
of politicalrngitatke -which had been marked by a
peat Revolutsee is a . neighbouring country, were
in times of preftiand psalm,. pronounced by. Minis-
ters to be ineificient—they should say, -inefficient in
their hands, . to:put awn irreligion andliedition
(bbas., Aeer)orlt seemed that at the close of

and to the same extent
They were to be ,
had bees thrown
should give
exchange for it. We
ith those victories
glory, if the-
.? Will not
extraordioary
raised from obscui
' The victory of
taus as he thought it, woul
suffice for the loss done ate-
What was it that had sustained
the arduous struggle for the !
but the Press? It was the Press
Dented, somewhat grossly
military despotism being established
and that had upheld in such - •
sings exclusively enjoyed und.
England—l Hear, hear, hear).—
which it was now proposed
did think that something
of the Bill at present before
etpress his belief that it was
been attempted to impose tl
any other view than that of
What were the objects of tins
compress publications wiC
shackle it with recognizances
selves, and sureties from their
add the penalty of banishment
of a blasphemous or seditious
to say, that the first proposition
tion of the Liberty of the
yet been demauded but when
fended the law, or bad :hewn
do so by awn seem act. r
met* ea durpsesanyaiori
the law, he would repeat,
tion....sueh' a pttoposition
some. Ultra-Tory,,,pho wets sat.,
do* of liberty in the Justinian
present vague definition of libel,
man in that House, he would
come respoosible for another.
occupation of 'the political
extended to a class of men
their sureties would be
would go much farther in
quence of this was, to throw
recognizance: on authors •
would be found to be of

the Censtitution. No stub.
sures now in contemplation,
lids his sentiments on the
day, unless he be able to'
stadA:43oo for bit
believe that a Right. Hon.
.Lunt oat the right baud
ipiodoced the BiM, and
td well known, bad assented
bb abould hear him assert
would venture to say
Censorship that had ever ,
dptible was that of money
oable man of genius,
you may go about your h
—Go you and enlighten
humble member o eßepublic
no longer! We shall haT -
State indeed. He would
Lord, if Dr. Johnson, or
essayists or satirists of recent
class of hund-toqnouth
limpness ittbe present Bill.
He objected to the ponsishimemt
cause be thought ittite *est
mints. To the maxi wbe
k would bone punishment ;
suck ties, it would be Axone
fence happened to be one
offender would be well ?emir,
but if it altauld be tee in
the CiatingettwoilW
Government of this Country, .
would be -abased from monitory
monstrous stunner. He equally
tin; Fovision of the Bill which
of inWteting unlimited
Pu'llginntigh lOW to be so
stoneold -bewail to consider
would hereon the minds(
not be taught to take • into
pvez-severity of the law,
los visitatlon by their dolnion,
• ouse to consider without tia,
*di all its faults—to remember
done. ;He did _think:
portion of the .
• be thoughtgot the same
family for it, anci_nntil:
tilka, and. its remit known,
.striction do it sboatd be laid
it was on behalf of the ;respectable
that he most especially called •
h was that which he asked.-
the most scrupulous and
C41,70f the House: for
rhensuch
faith.'-'

Mr. DIe!DENSON regarded
as an infriggement of the
,the sobject,hut as a measure necessarily
the anarchy and =hellion that threatened c.
elm the. Country ; and he trusted that that 11
mould set an example of firmness, by giviug
peaceable and well disposed that protection sE!
.they had a sight to require.
Mr. Serjeant ONSLOW thought his tlency.:r:
-Friend (Mr. Macdonald) bad eaistaken the Bill,
he spoke of it as taking away all security fron:
diets. The &11 went to derhand security from
printer aid publisher of a political work, but it nia4
no mentiosof the author. Its provisions would sEicl
no respectable bookseller, but only those persons ,a
having nothing of their own at stake, were urged c
by others to .usher into the world those infamous I',
pers which it was the object of Allis mensule to p
down, and which no respectable bookseller mruu.
He thought his Honourable Friend wro:
a point, where he had alluded to the punig
be inilicsed fur ,as .etseond aireisee• kle
asider the =lesson wade to.the case 0f,4
as-esactly in point. Awn the respect-abs
tor thd decision of JAW" he 10:011*" sal t

gr.aht tt
h theyllem hadey.l
always the intention of Ministers to apply this me*. of respectability would place his capital or hi-, et t. manner and to ti
o
sto sure to Ireland.% It wou)d' damiLthat co •, ) INAS in the bookselling . „war, -0.- h.to.atydirp:adydfoifil
.u.ZA Fie i.,twicallArC -,,
in exchange
on derkif che Rai:Scats here •••- ••• persons •0"•. . ; and particu die wki .7 • - thia country' loatl
brelsl; thertwertlieont '. .- :~ twe•en ' •
.. ;•!Liverpool,
ail; aiuttlie evl‘tx.. •. • ost certainly brei ,to'r • it barns st •-
Pl:e9; ;the
eretdatbothilPe;ecenonan• thedtc.a.'irlin.:a-le; p
.-111se.. •
fora' been their gl
tHie sioutnatiherivu.i:hbeeenllstifleiclvh:ktre..:H•e :4;clo,fttieti:;:etitle fit.-;;;:isioitalli.--
wily ...n.r of the Mik il•k, not dispose them to politi- tu inted. . Gentleman) that
,
cal meetings or discassions, this act of ilitrvivatiourt ILAaftqlget/S AND Mitious Lien 1114. igressions first rai
.- P.lttsiAi. riresented a Petition from certain in his defeats? . '
• • • -I! - -- i f. I 1 M R

14)er so,' lisnheOiddlilitt' be able'to • earri business in 15 rears oime;fiiiii,inTthe----co;ir; of which the publish:
enduretVesieltititieillarlbtenehitete thist•to'be the ease:—dor- psis* of -the.eamatry had •shown a 'perseverance un- in another
to. fie ilfrOdlo-liteeditheteble,tintEl to beirinted. ,der their Ilkeston. Atourecetiented in history, and. snent to bi
oittee 00' "IlleWl,ll/IVI inlisented *Petition freen•sevend which liorLeoraribeted4o bring to a ternibtation,the not eonsid
MIMI& ibfitßri'itol; mine that if.'tbe present elms of their great may, thole peopiewere to be Hone as-e
t it 'was4 1/111411eptktiltriAbiltrereireverteitted.to-passittanino told sheyArappitafnied 10
_enjoy liberty in the he held to

og
iathiniattththseethUrCeHhilolieenloroapiunirietaeb.
t:toettoetiolli(iltsadd
own in .upon them as r
re np some of their Jibe
the
etories which had beret
;is was the price they wt
j
ry
of
Waterloo,whous gyreoau:
obscurity, have triumph, lit
would not, in his opini •
tom of our liberty Wes
sstaiired the Nltiou dun
the last twenty-five v.. -•
, ti
ae .Press that. had rep
perhaps, the horrors of k,
tstablished in this count.
sch vivid colours, the b .
under the Constitution a
wir).—Bre4 it was this Pr
A to shackle. He ceitair
might be urged in beii
re the House; but he
was the first time it h
the duty of a stamp
of increasing the Reverie I
this Bill ? First, it was,
;thin a certain range_,
ices from the parties th
their friends; secondly,
intent to the second offe
ions libeL Now he me ,
iosition was a gross vio
Press. Surety had nee
ilea as individual hail o
sewn himself on the road
But to demand • secu •
in that a man would offen •
4 was a monstrous propo
must have proceeded fie
satisfied to seek his des,
ustioian Code. Under '
if libel, would any Gen
would ask, be ready to • ,
alter, engaged in the dail
ical Press ? and this, ah.
men with whom the loss
the total loss of form,
is its operation. The co,
throW the whole weight
s ; which, when consider.
F the greatest importance
aw, according to the •
ion, would be able to p
the transactions of his oi
s lack up £1,200 C6OO
is publisher. He would
1. Gentleman (Mr. Canning
ad of the Noble Lord wt
whose literary labours a
ted to that proposition, us,
t it himself—( /fear, Aar
sy, that of all the species
• been devised, the mostc.
coney I This Bill said to
have you £1200?
business! To the rich it s:,
us! Pass this Bill, and
tatpublic of Letters will ex'
lave 'a baneful aristocratic
Id be glad to ask the Nob'
t any other of those emin
*cent date, who were of ,
s authors, could have go,
lin had been in existence
ishnient of banishment,
eilost unequal of all pun'.
• had no ties in this count.,
act; but to the man who h
twee than death. If the
se of a domestic nature,
received on the Continent
in which all the Powers
ske common cause with
nary, the uafortuante
erritory to territory in a
'equally strongly objected;
ill which gave to Judges*
nlimited uqprisenmeat.
saperadded is this manse
Odor the elect such a syste
is of Jurymen. Would
into their consideration tl:
ro inhiectinic
locisivn? He implored
out delay what the Press%
member what it had heret
six that Use lowest and
le Press had degradrai
tame time, there was a UAW:
1. that remedy had been '
own, no new measures of
t laid before the House.
respectable part of the P.
called upon them to
sked of them • to Cherish el
d zelizious care. He b .
For having
.detained.checn
tent discussions-were peed.
(Hear, hear).
needed the present Bill.:
be just rights and libet-tie`'
,ensure necessarily oppose,'
ion that threatened to isse
not he trusted that that llc
of firmness, by giving
'posed that protection al:.
uire.
DW ;bought his tlonotiras.
It h.,4 iesisteiron the Bill, It::