Star.
London, England, 1817-12-20 00:00:00

etortg. an the hooks of Moses were. nothing but
opposes." Who could say that this was decent?
Mr Hotta said. he would stake his credit with the
'dry, .hat the remaining part was perfectly innocent,
paor.ti, and even pious, and was necessary to abew
the idiport of the rest.
Lord EtLerisonoucor said, that at the defendant's
finest intreaty he would permit it to be read.
ltlr. Hess went on—
" Thus, in this battkereyal,
As nate would take doilial,
The d.inse for whom they strew% sir,
Could neither of than love, sir,
Since all had given ollence, Ito..
lltfe therefore, slily weldor:, •
Lett ail threefools a.prating„;
And being in a fright, sir,
Rd gout took her if sir,
And'oe'er we. beard of dna, Ike."
Nfr. HoNs 4; •Illnill••d to trier to various parodies,
kc. in Croxali's Fair Circassian. rte Humourist's
id,,gaznie, Old England's le Drum, and Grose's
oii„. He iiso introduced a new one fr m a speeei
ri Mr. Burke in 1780, on the dissolution of the
tockinghain Adininistratien ; on which he said,
And now I hereby commit their body to the grave,
tsh,-, to ashes, dust to dust, in certain hope and ex
ytctatiun of the i. rious resurrection, which by its
ro.i deeds it shall surely see," &c. He would now
tall their attention to a parody which was published'
by Mr. Reeves some years ago, whets he was at the
},cad's a society for ,trpia irting loyalty and 010Freril
Jio)bins and levellers. It we. called, The
Jr +hl Freekt/ders Cateckirser."- l'he Attorney Gene-
11.id volcen .of the small sum for which his (the
drieadant's) public anons were s. Id; but Mr. Reeves's
poody ei.s• published for .s petioy. Mr. Reeves,
tswever, .he knew not how, hail greatly improved
hi online a since tnat time, and ins name stood is
the title-,.age tie book of Common. Prayer, in
most getieral use; as pat, ntee. In :hat Prayer Book
he had ins red a preface, dedie,•ted to her Majesty,
in which be pod her many coniphinents. .The Gep.
*men *fluid observe, aiso, that Mr. Reeves was a
lawyer ; he w is a Barrister, and had been a Commis.
Siemer of 11.nkrupts i but he (the defendant) did not
believe ill it when Mr. Reeves published his parody
had any conception that he was seeding religion:
intention merely was to convey an instiuctson by'
jug the Catechism ; and it tie were now stan-
ehere the defendant did, he,
As a lawyer, would
telithem that they could not corn set him ; but be
never been prosecuted, and those two books, the
idy and theCatechisin, now went together...*
Lordship would, doubtless, recollect, that one of
suns was a member ot that association at the
. and Anchor ; but so ardent was the seal of
Reeves to put down levellers and retormers,that
Law withdrew himsiif 'tom the society. Mr.
was now its a very different situation Irons the
int. Mr. Reeves was a ricii man, and held a
wider Government : the defendant was a
hunible ihop-keeper. Would his Majesty's At-
, general bring t. Retires before the Court ?
I Slid 'he taught not to bring him there ; for
would tett them that Mr. Reeves had no
to ridicule the-Citethism. Neither had he
when lie vanished to, parody.--
to serve .the p..litical party be
' Mr. Hone). It was not
tasted, or those who
iti power oppressed and perse-
tinder , pretences. The press was common
•t it was a great security which every man
' telt he read aganist injustice. Even he,
there, telt that there was no one in that
, even ii.disposed (which he believed there was
to do him an injustice, who would dare to do so.
why N.-Because the act could not be hidden in
it would be made known by means of a
and excite a public opinioN#Which would
__ ter the most powerful ot evil doers. Let
this prosecution, which aimed at so valuable
• as the Liberty of the Press, be put on its
. and be stripped of its hypocritical pro
There was a passage which he had read yes-
, Irons the, works of a man who had died for the
Bishop Latimer. He could not forbear again
- it. It was to be found' to the second volume
p. 90111; and was termed 44 the first of
Latimer's 'Vero Sermons of the Lnot,l
bridge in Yid vent. 1596." At
Bishop thus preached tt om tits
' 'And this is the record of
sent Priests and Levitt%
him, Wit • art thou ?"
declare Christ's rule unto
to be done, I will apply
custom atthis time of Christ-
, declare unto yott Christ's
in Christ's cards, Wherein yosil
The game that we will
trials/4 (this word is what we'
it be well played at,
1 the stamders and lookenl
insomuch that there is se:
at this triumph with theist
all winners and so tarn s,
Christian mast and woman play,
may have and obtain the
also, that the trittmph
home auto him all the other
; Ire of. Ncrw, then, take
most appear and be shewed
He would not uke up the
reading the whole of what the
said, but ireold norkse him.
he described bad passions
4, These evil disposed a-
-1 us are •alway contrary to
• shall we do now or Imagine
Turks, and to 'subdue them ?-
111 tame for a Christian man
..sinton Toth. Nay, •it shall
cost a tramp in their way, and
'• who AA hale the better.
obis fashion with thiseard.'
happen .thew foul resigns and
stomach* against oar brother
unkind words, injuries, or
..done untovsliontrary onto
' Vs ,call unt9vabr utineut•
questionmatoostnelves, "Who
4i Lam *Christian man."
Jhen ' he was in .the 'habit :of:
a sermon with a wood Auk
ltraeltelltediN in the 44t Mt:
hs 'pulpit. Hem wished the'

Attorney-General wash 4. ask himself Tindall
which the Martyr required his hearers. wash them-
selves.and to answer to his conscience whether there
was a necessity -for- their proceedings against him.
On the 22d of February he had stopped the sale of
these parodies. and it was on the Sd of May that the
itsformatiJn was filed against him. He disclaimed
any evilintention in his merriment more th,it Bashi,
Latimer bad in 'his. Thouah Perhaps such. a mode
of preaching av that of the. Bishop would not be tole-
rated at this day, yet every one would acquit him 0,
en evil intention. Archdeacon Paley, his Lordship's
tutor, preached a sermon at, Cambridge, when Mr.
Pitt visited that University, on the text here are bet
*even loaves and five small fishes, and what are they
among so. many."
Lord Enutonottanton said, the defendant was mis,
taken on that point. There never had been any ser-
mon from that test by Dr. Paley. There was an
anecdote of that sort, and he was sorry for it.
Mr. Hotta would not venture to contradict his
Lordship, and was much obliged to him for stating
that there had been a story of that kind. Mr. Hone
proceeded—There was a parody from The True Bri-
ton, in the Spirit of the Public Journals, of 1507, on
the Lord's Prayer. I'ne proprietor of the paper at
Pat time was Mr. John Hermit, who had now a
place or pension from his Majesty's Government.—.
Was it lair, honourable, or manly, to make such a
distinction between parodists? There was also the
parody by Canning, one of his persecutors, one of the
men who advised this prosecution, or who might
have prevented it. Was it lair that Ministers, to
excite a prejedice against a man who had only been
in the habit of doing what they themselves had done,
should charge him with blasphemy—a crime which
they knew he bad never committed ? Mr. Hone then
alluded to the caricatures of Wray, who welkin the
pay of Messrs. Pitt. Canning. Hookhatn, Frere, and
Co. in which he ridiculed the Duke of Bedford,
Mr. Fox, and Mr..Whitbread ; in which he also
described Messrs.- Coleridge. and Soethey as asses
supporting the cornucopia of ignorance, without
any other difference than that the ears of the latter
were longer than the ears of the torness....—
In the same print the Cowrie, was saricatarae, and
out of the pocket of the emblematical figure hung a
French paper. which alluded, Mr. Hose said, to as
iMpoSitton pructoseJ by the Courier on a rival paper
milted the l'elegratei. by the fabrication of a French
paper called L'Aelai., from which forgery the
paint was induced to take some false articles of news.
Alt this was in illustration and furtherance of the
objectaof Mr. Canning's parody. Mr. Hone then al-
luded to the manner in which the different 'sacred
hymns had been applied by the Dissenters to lay
tunes, with the most laudable intent ; a practice, how.
ever, which would be reprehensible on the same
grounds on which parodies were reprehended. lie
repeated the instances of llth:practice which he Bad
adduced on his lormer trial. He then proceeded to
adduce instances of the parodies of thaLitanyitself.
The first he mentioned was from the " Romp. or an
exact Collection of the choicest Poems andSongasa.
hating to the late Times. By the most eminent Wits.
Pro:o Anno 1630 to anno 1661. -1.....nd0e.1602.".--
A LETANY FOR THE NEW YEAR,
From all and mere than 1 have wrisea ben,
I wish you welt protected this New-yea:
From Ucil War, and such uncivil slings,
As ruins Law and Gospel, Priests and Kings ;
From these who hr self-ends would all betray,
From such new Sestets that Pistol when they pray,
From nattering Faces with infernal Souls,
From new Reformers. pleb as pull dawn Paula,
From lamywoby Lords, Irmo Town betrayers,
From Aprou preachers sad Zatempore Prams,
From Pulpit bitarbany mid bold Rebuilt's,
From Blood and—somentlnaselap,tkat I told tell ye so,
Prom new False Teachers which destroy the old,
From those Mai lawn the Clevel ism chid,
From that black Pack where Chiba We ammo' Tnuey.
Prom Bodies Politique toad frets the Rump,
From them that Risme whoa they should Repairs
Frown sucb a• cut of Heads Instead of Hair,
From twelve mouths Tales and Abortive Vote.,
Frets! chargeable Nummt.:bildruis in red Coats, .^ •
From such as tell their Soule to saws their Sams..
From City ChAwers diet make Heads ter Drees,
From Meatstvates which have so truth or aseirkaars
From the Red &sham now is Gresham Cage,
Roes Governments erected by dm Rabble,
from sweet Sir Arthur's Katsina of the Round Tablet
Ihen followed as.other from the same Book, Raid
•I The City of London's Litany." of ,which he read a
short extract t

Frans amps that do Role against Cumin and Laws,
From Card% et Peados ottrtda Goad Old came,
From Wives that bate sada mbiek anabarptr tbao ohms.
Good Jove deliver es
!reset Men wbo seek riskt Wilma ie. s« to be bad.
From 1111d1 who mak hood where Si damp are bad,
From wise Mos ter won. them look or men mad,
Good love, Ike.

Foes Soltherm that wrath therm wat ethwes,
Froth Rage that stuff Clef,. to pleasant Mir WWI%
Width they secretly evens front Commonwealth wore%
Good love,

The nest was from the r, Collection of the newest'
and most ingenious Peens, etc. against Popery," pub-
lished soon aker the Rev, slating.
-A NSW PROTESTANT UTAST.
Cobweb.Lawn-Chartere„ from shanyfreedaM banters,
Our Llberty-beepers and new Gospel-planters.
And the trusty Wed bends of our Feet Quo Warrenton,
Libor& Nos, ke.
Fount High Court Commistlone, to ROM* to rejoin as,
Prost a Rheims* Cbsemlior, the Wasesill Fudge Waal,
Made Mead of oar March by new I' Dived*.
Vitas No., Ste.
From our great Tom Reeorde, eat out into thrums,
From Weeteitoper 4A S. aid writh ra•Oes sad plums,
Magna Charm/ !Amos Fano, made fodder for bums,
Libera Not, Sm.
Promo new float lkone Nob*, to tit' of SW'S of Lawn,
Lad all to make roan for the PopoLander Spawn •
tees etw Babe bent, through iped-antainreime Spawn;
tams Neal its.
From resotvlng o'er night, where to Be in tomorrow,
And from tuning Back doer to Midwife thorow,
Eight months foll.grown,damthibkbess
From a GodAtther Pope, 40 the +fele of 'Minim;
From three (Arleta° Names to anollir-name nolinown,
With a Tyler Mitch Nurse, now dm ModelesL mak% genet
ibor* Mos,
There was one from the second part Of the
collection, beginning—
From immoderate floes and defamation,-
From Bra. Monte sameilerombornatioa,
•
And. front .bar of aatimetakilin.
Men oat Domino-
Front a body that's English, minds d shot Y 1101041.
From a Lawyer tastresidslibesn oyster womb,
And mom the odor 'Bonner span 4bo Sleek
4041;41M Abriktrle• Air- Sts.
Mr..floitp read Many other in the same
There was one whiCh he bad omitted to *"

boat pangeeseiTow,'
jJbeta Nose

regnlast order. yrit;ch he sbou)d now mention. It
'rasa parodyon this very litany by Ben Juason, in his
play called Cynthia's Revels :

Amt. Press Spanish sbrugs, French fates, smirks, lrps, and
all affected humours,
Chorus—Good Mercury defend us.
Pba. Prom secret friends, sweet servants, loves doves, and
such pltantastilue humours,

Mercury defend ov.
Amo. Prom stabbing of armee, lap-dragous. health", whiffet,
and all such swaggering humours,
Cliorus—tiood Mercury defend us.
Pha. From Waving iannee, coy glance., &hes, cringes, and
all each straying humour".
Chorus—Gond Mercury defend wt.
Amo. From making love by atturtarb courting of puppets,
and paying for new acqtaintance
Chcrts4—Good Mercury deliver us, Ste. !cc.
This the play informet us, was acted first in
1600, by the then children of Queen Elizabeth's
Chapel, allowed by the master of the revels ;" so that
in those days, Ben Jolson, who, from his works was
evidently a most devout man, did not think it unbe-
coming to write a parody ; nor did a Queen, who was
scrupulous in requiring respect to things established,
think it unfit to be recited even by the children of her
chapel. He had thus shewn that parodies were not
necessarily disrespectful to the work parodied; that
they had been uniformly allowed, and he should now
shew that his did riot deserve to be made an excep-
tion to the general rule.
' Here Mr. HONE proceeded to animadvert upon the
several paisages of the Litany which was the subject
.4 prosecution, selecting such as appeared to girt
most offence to the political Gentlemen, who sought,
under the gui;e of religion, to effect a political object
in his rain It prayed our delivery, Ist, from •• an
unnational Debt ;" 2d, from 44 unmerited Pensions ;"
3d, from Sinecure Places ;" 4th. from "an extra-
v agent Civil List ;" and sth, from utter starvation."
Now, as to the first, how kw were they who doubted,
that many debts had been contracted by our rulers, fir
purposes by no means national?—Good Ministers hag
nothing to fear from the promulgation of such things.
No Government could, indeed, have so much reason
to fear any thing as the effects of such prosecution, s
prosecution as he had been subjected to in this in-
stance, in consequence of the frank expression of his
mind. Then as to unmerited pensions, that was not
to be understood as applying to the reward of public
servants. such, for instance, as really perforated their
duty upon the Bench or elsewhere, but to those who
derived 'fortunes from the public purse, without any
public setvier whatever • and how niany such men
were to be found in England t Of the 1, Extrava--
font Civil List" he did not think it necess.iry to say
any thing ; nor of « utter starvation" either, for no
one acquainted with London, or any of the great
towns in the country, for the last twelve months,
could require any information upon that point. lie
had himself, indeed, seen two human beings who
had actually expired in the streets from lbsultite want.
Bot similar scenes must have been witnessed by num-
bers of those who heard him, as well as by the Jury.i
For in every direction the ravages of famine were A-
Able and most sensibly felt. Next our delivery was
'prayed from the blind imbecility of Ministers, as well
as from the pride and vain-glory of warlike establish.!
menus in time of peace. This prayer might be found
Lash with by his political prosecutors, but yet, who
sold doubt the Imbecility of Ministers r He, 'for
one, confessed that he could not. There were, he
believed, some men of honest purpose among the
Ministers, while they evinced the want of wisdom;
but there were others in that body, who, while they
bad reputation for talent, had equal reputation for the
want of principle. What, then, was to be expected'
, from such a combihation of integrity without talent, ,
and talent without integrity ; Nothing, surely, but
imbecility. In asserting that implicitly, himerer, he
did not mean to reflect upon the private life of any
man; for, correctly speaking, the private life of a !
man had no connection with his fitness or capability
for the performance of the great duties of a statesman- ;
—A man might be very amiable towards his family
and friends, and exemplary in the performance of all
the moral duties, while his mind was not large enough
to conceive the obligations which attached to the cha. I
racier of a Statesman. The mind of a good private
man might indeed be quite incompetent to embrace,
a Statesman's views, or to understand his duties. A
very good man might therefore, from such incapacity,
tttt lam a meteor, like the present Ministers, groping
its the dark. He might, notwithstanding the honesty
wf his intentions, or the purity of his principles, be
wholly incapable of devising means to maintain the
hum, the dignity, and the honour of the country.
He could mean no reflection, therefore, upon the per.
sonel character of the Members of the Administration,'
when he charged them with imbecility. Now, as to
the warlike establishments in time of peace, he put it
to the Jury whether such establishments did not at
this moment notoriously exist t There was an Act
rif Parliament, no doubt. to sanction those establish-
ments ; but this country had often witnessed Acts
of Parliament which were not entitled to public
respect—which were, indeed, in direct contradiction
to the principles of the British Constitution. This
be-said becauot he thought so; and was it not
better that he and others should be encouraged
to express their mind, than to conceal it, 'and
reserve the expression for secret conspiracies ?
Every rational n,aa would answer in the affirmative.
For it was always more desirable to auy considerate
man to be told when and where be was wrong, than
to bare the advantage of such informed in withheld
from him. Such must be the case with every man
oho was not deaf to his own interest. For himself

he could have no hesitation in saying that he should
esteem the friend w,bo frankly told him be was wrong,
because he should thus learn how to apply a remedy,
and the minister who did not so feel towards any
man who informed them of their errors, must be in-
sensible to their interest, as well as indifferent to their
character. But any government which would not
hear the truth must be a despotism. He did not mean
that calumny should be tolerated, but that the es
incision of truth should,be encouraged, and no honest
man could have any thing to fear from misrepresen-
tation ; for, that honesty was always sure to defeat,'
whether it applied to Government or to individuals.
But wby should Government be afraid of truth or falbe•
hood in any case ?- Nothing but weakness could pro.
ducessneb fear, and that weakness must be pitiabl
Another prayer appeared in the Litany, that the
country should be delivered from all the deadly sins
attendant upon a corrupt method of election, from
stal die deceits of tbe'pensione4 birelinits of *the. press.

net who could deny that the most flagitious tomtit•
tioo prevailed in the prevalent system of election for
Members of Parliament? Such corruption was Ins
deed as notorious as the son at. tr.neiday, and there.
fore this prayer ci.uld not be condenineatunless upon
the ground that truth • as a libel, and this was a doe•
trine never recognized by any Jury (who were entitled
to judee of the law), although generally asserted by
the Judge.. But for himself he could not conceive hove
truth, with respect to any public act or public officer,
could be deemed a libel ; and he hoped the Jury
whom he had the !moue to address would not give
up their right of decision upon this material point
to the dictum of any individual. Another prayer iv
peared in this Litany for our deliveranee from taxes
levied by distress—from gaols crowded with debtors
—own poor-nooses overfl•oving with paupers. As
to the first, it was universally known that the greater
part of the taxes were levied by distress at the time
this Litany was published. One tax-gatherer, indeed,
employed in the vicinity of Fleet-street had told him,
that he had levied more distress for the payment of
taxes within nine months before this publication, than
he had done within the sixteen preceding years.—
When then such a great calamity existed—when all
things were going wrung, where was the harm of
saying so; or was it not rather desirable to make it.
known ? Were he told that his affairs were going
wrong, his first object would be to cast up his ac-
counts, in order to see the magnitude of his danger,
and to provide some remedy,, while he would thank
the individual who roused .him to a sense of his dan-
ger. And why should not the Government be equally
grateful fur similar information and excitement to
inquiry ? But it would he so, it its members were
not imbecile, self-conceited, and supine." Tnen as to
prisons crowded with debtors, was there a quarter of
England, or a man in the country, !hat could not ma. •
tify this fact ? He l,fmself had seen the c,ndition 9f the
King's Bence prison. The night upon which he
was committed to that prison, in consequence of
this prosecution, he had to *walk about the y.ird for
sonic time, unknowing where to find a lodging.-..
At length he applied et the door for the tipstaff by
whom he was taken into custody, and brought in,
requesting to know where he war to obtain a night's
lodging ? and, in consequence of this application, he
I was conducted to the coffee-room, where alone he
could, from the crowded state of the prison, find any
sort of accommodation. Such was the statement to
him at the time, and such he afterwards tots id to be
the fact. At the eeffee-room he took up his abode,
and there he was under the necessity of paying three
shillings a night tia sleeping in a room with three
other prisoners. But this inconvenience, which he
most sensibly felt, was inevitable, from the ea-
timely crowned state of the prison. Another
root of the crowded state of our prisons, he had
lately seen at Maidstone, where a prison, to occupy
fourteen acres of ground Was now buildieg, • AVOW..
I edly with a view to provide proper accommodation
for the miserable prisoners of the County of Kent,
in addition to that afforded by the County jail;-:-
With respect to the overflow of poorhouses, he did not
think it necessary to say ally thing upon that point,
as every Gtintleman of the Jury must, no doubt be
competent, trona his own experience and information,
fully to decide the truth of toot allegation. The nest
prayer of this publication was, as to 00 a Parliament
chosen only by one-tenth of the people. Taxes raised
to pay wholesale butchers their subsidies, false doe.
trine., heresy, and chisms. Conspiracies against ffie
Liberty of the People, and obstacles thrown in the way
of our natural and constitutional rights." That Pat.
liaments were not chosen by more than one-tenth of the
people, was, he apprehended, an indisputable facto--
He, himself, had been fur the most part of his life a
housekeeper, and yet he had never enjoyed the right
of voting fur a Member of the House of Commons.
This he must consider as a great grievance. He,
and others, similarly circumstanced, were no doubt
told that they were represented virtually as some
class. But this was a mere delusion, only aggro.
eating the uitjust privation of his right by an iucuit
to his understanding. Then, as to human butchery
in what other light were those to be regarded, who
let out their subjects to be shot at, or to shoot others
for hire I False doctrines were surely chargeable
upon those who sanctioned those notions of '0 leglti-
mate right," which were inconsistent with the Con-
stitution and conduct of this country. • But such doc-
trines were to be expected from those Ministers who
were inattentive to the want, of the people—who dis-
regarded the example of- that truly great Sovereign,
Henry IV. who said, in the spirit of true benevolence
and princely duty, that his utmost ambition was, that
every peasant in his dominions should have each day
a pullet in his fit. The existence of conspiracies
;against the liberties of the people was sufficiently ob-
thous from the suspension of the Habeas Cot plls Act.
—The next prayer In the Goverinent-0. that ye
spend not extravagantly the money raised from the
production of our labours, nor take for yourselves
that which ye need not," was surely not to be con.
denined, especially after that Government had lane.
tioned theseandalcus Lisbon jon. in which Mr.. Ca-
nning took from the public purse, no less tban £14,000
for doing nothing in a situation in which his prede.
cessor, who had something to Jo, received only 4000.
Yet this deduction (tom the public purse, at a period
of, dire distress, Ministers made for the most =pro,.
per purpose, and Mr. Canning accepted the bribe
without the excuse of necessity, for his means were
ample. But did not such a transaction justify an all j.
SIMI to public money spent extravagantly, and given
to those who needed it not.—After Vindicating Vie
several passages of the Litany, Mr. Hone observed,
that to any candid mind the whole production was
only calculated to excite laughter, not against the
Scripture, but against those towards whom the pa.
rody was pointed, and laughter was not the 1)41)4 ee
disposition of traitors t r disaffected men. No sr 71x
persons were like the lean Cassius, slow, sullen and
unsocial, unless they met with persons of their o•-•-o
description ; but there was nothing in this Litany cal-
culated to please such men, for they liked not a laugh.:
He next produced sever:4i of Mr. Gilray's prints, and
among them one called the kecoardiation, in which
the Prince of Wales was madseintnteitad,digtatsitsl::•,ethKeein.ganisin
more worthy to be called
againstd ese wo Ldsea.—veFna,tahieird,
,I,
n 1 'lave
n.,
thy son—with the reply to it, taken from the parable
of the prodigal son in the New Testament. -This was
a very well execeted print, and he dated to say that
it was in the collection of the Prince Regent hinteek,
as be had all" Mr. Gilray's pieces. Having done this,

he had any conception that he wa
intention merely was to cony
ruilyiug the Catechism ; and'
ag• where the delendant did, he,
trllthem that they could not cr
had never been prosecuted, end t
Fundy and the Catechists, noir
LorJsflip would, doubtless, rl
hi suns was a member ot that
Down and Anchor ; but so and
bir. Reeve* to put down leveller'
14.. Law withdrew himself trim
Raver was now ill a very ditfereri
ditadant. Mr. Reeves was a ft'
fission. under Government
poor humble ihup-keeper. Wou
fancy general tiring Sit. Reuvet
No I an: 'he ought not to bring
Lordship would tett them that I
',tuition to ridicule the-Ctfrthist
-ny such intention when he plot'
Wirev d to serve .1 h
you he (Mr. I
• • • r Jae ,h
srailed•t ite power c
wed under se pretences. Th
• Telly; it was a great secant
k:ng.and telt he tuad against i
t he stood there, telt that there
'outs, e'en it. disposed (which ht
r ) to do him an injustice, who
s est why i'—Because the act cou
II corner: it would be made kni
• press, and excite a public a
terrible to the must powertut
•
skis prosecution, which aim
• liege as the Liberty ot the I
ground, and be stripped ot
1 There was a passage whit
I. day tram the.works ot a man
'th, Bishop Latimer. He coy
adios it. It was to be loan:Iv
his works, p. 908; and was tt
r* aster Hugh Letimer's Tiro Be
ched at Cambridge in AI
t solemn time, the Bishop the
, John i. verse 9-41 And It
• n, when the Jews sent I
r •-• Jerusalem to ask him,
tind because I cannot declass
• .at one time as it often to ta
to ;self according to your custom
a'. I will, as I said, &chit
le, bat that shall be in Christi
'alt perceive Christ's role. Th
• y at shall .be the triewini (i
'w call trearp), which, it it tss
• t deateth shall win, and the
. • • shall do the **mei 'ingot
that is willing to play at th
rds but they shall be all wi
, therefore, every Christian xi
these cards, that . they may
...h. Yen must mark, ale
ust apply to fetch home urn
• ds, whatsoever suit they be
.. thus first card, which mast a
o you as tolloweth.l' H. wi
• of the Court by reading th
erend Prelate had *aid, but
f to a passage where* he de
der the name of Turks.
tions and sensualifies in us ae
salvation. What shall we
thrust down these Turks, =4
is a great ignominy and sham
be bound and subject VINO a
be so ; we will first east a lei
'7 with them at cards who •
us play, therefore, on this 11
• r.ensoever it shallthappen
• crks do rise in -our stomachs
neighbour, either for nnkir
ill ongs, which they huve•done t
rh mind, straiglitvrays let its .1
rs Ice and speak that ()notional
rev thou!" Tne answer is, •44 •I •a
,had teen ar arthe time "en't
eu
•Hog in 44, Tosco, a .sersuoi
ha• Kh lig:Bishop am -represcrt
w Ohre luudth k cirri in