Star.
London, England, 1827-11-09 00:00:00

FLANDERS MAID.

81t038111.5, livrapans S.
We have Mart of various deaden tamed-
-Morin on the night of the Slst of October. Great
mage was done to the fishing boats at Schematinger4l
and among other accidents we hear of the loss of a steam
boat, bound from Amsterdam to London, with passew
gers ; but we hope that this report will oot be confirmed.

Nov. 4.—Yesterday arrived at the Hord d'Angle-
term, a hearse, containing the mortal remains of Mr.
Moore, an English Gentleman, who died in Frantfort,
and which his family has ordered to be conveyed to
England. The hearse was followed by three post
carriage!.

A lit itish Cabinet Messenger passed through this city
last night. on his way from LoAdon to Vienna with
dispatches.

We have accounts which mention wrecks of ships
which were thrown on the coasts of the Texel, on the
lst of the month, and also a brig which was stranded ;
but they say nothing of the accident reported to have
occurred to the steam boat from Amsterdam to Lon-
don; so that we hope that this repot t will prove false.
Nov. s.—Ftom the frequent passage of Cabinet
Messengers, it is to be presumed that some important
negociatien is on foot.
Nov. 6.—We observed yesterday that the Northern
Jour.ials did not mention the loss of the steamboat
bound to tendon, and those we hive since received are
still silent on the subject; bqt the Courier de la Meuse
gives the following articles
" We have just beess'shewn the extract ora letter
from Amsterdam of the 2d instant, which giaes the
afflicting news of the total loss of the steamboat from•

Rotterd—ain to London; 21:sengers and the whole
crew perished. This 1 boly event, respecting
which no further particulars are given, took place on
Wednesday night, dazing a tempest au the coast of
Holland."

The Brawls Josenal Ls Beige emirs" tkatshis news
requires confirmation, as the Amsterdam' Journal of the
4th of November doss sot mention it.
• The departure of the cause de Cello to Royal is
delayed for some days by a fresh attack of the gout,
which, however, it is hoped will soon be over.

LAW INTELLIGSSeg.

COURT OF CHANCERY, No% &

002011/11 NOR SOMI

Mr. DAsum. moved that a day might be fixed for
hearing this case. It was arranged that it should come
oa at the first :notion day.

PHIPPS V. LORD INNISMORIL
Counsel were heard in this cause upon an appeal frau
a judgment of the Vice• Chancellor. The subject of the
suit was the validity of a trust in the marriage settle,
meta of Lord Ennissoore's daughter with Major Balders.l
The party claimant was entitled to an annuity charged,
on the estate of which the disputed trust was declared,l
and be insisted that the trustees bad no right to receive
and appropriate the rents for the purposes of the settle-
mem, otherwise than subject to his charges.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said he would coisslder thei
cue, and give judgment at a future day.

VICE CHANCELLOR'S COURT, biomass% S.
1110ADU V. LORD SILSIY.

The plaintiff in this case, who had for many years
acted as steward, agent, and solicitor, to the family of
the defendant, bad advanced several apes of money to
the present Lord Selsey, for the purposed enabling the
defendant to pay certain legacies which had been left
by the late Lord Selsey. The plaintiff and defendant
disagreed in 3820 about a farm, which the plaintiff had
taken under an agreement. from John. Lord Selsey.-1
The defendant endeavoured to set that agreement aside.
His Lordship brought the matter before the Court of
Chancery, where the decree was in favour or Mr.
Rhoades. His Lordship then appealed to the House of
Lords, where the decision was also in favour of Mr.
Rhoades. Lord Selsey took the agency out of the plain-
tiff's hands so long ago as the year 1820; but the set.
clement of the accounts between them, and the payment
of a large balance due from the defendant to the plain-
tiff, was delayed from time to time; and during this
delay, the plaintiff, knowing that the defendant was in-
debted to him, and for other reasons, had suffered the
rent of the farm, which had been the subject of dispute
between them, to go into arrear. Lord Macy put in a
distress for rent, and the plaintiff then filed a bill, which
prayed an injunction to restrain any farther legal pro-
ceedings on the part of Lord Selsey, and also that an
account of all the transactions between the plaintiff and
defendant might be taken before the Master. To this
hill the defendant had demurred, on the ground of want
of equity ow the part of the plaintiff.
Mr. Sagirsir, in support of the demurrer, contended,
that the plaintiff's remedy was an action of account.
Among the whole of the transactions that bad taken
place between the plaintiff and Lord Selsey, there was
none to call for or to warrant the interference of the
tow of Chancery. He was quite sure, that upon a
review of those uansactions, there would appear no rea-
son for departing from the long established practice in
matters of this nature, or from the policy which bad al-
ways refused an equitable remedy where the Courts of
law were open to the person who felt himself agrieved.
The Learned Counsel cited cases in support of his ar-
gument, and especially one decided by the present
Master of the Rolls, in which a bit, for an account be.