Star.
London, England, 1804-10-25 00:00:00

the AEI was pared. 2t was, however, leis a matter
of law than an appeal to the good fettle of the Jury.
and by the exercife of their own understanding they
would decide. When this matter was a queltion
before the King's Bench, the Noble and Learned
Judge who then prefided (Lord Ks:iron), Paid, he
confidered the building an evafinn of the Retire : the
Jury, however, held a different, perhaps a founds
opinion, and gave a verdict contrary to the dire lion
they had received. "If (continued the Learned
Chairman) this be a building n ithin the Aft, I do
not know, hat will not be fo. Here is no floor or
foundation ; and I do org fee why a garden-chair
may not, on the fame principle, be denominated a
' building. I conceive the Aft meant, you thould not
cleft any place of habitation for man or bean. The
term 0 erefted" hardly applies here ; and the An
advent to a foundation ; but there is no foundation.
The Traces come here with a very rich public purfe,
and they oppofe the Defendant even with the money
he contributes to the toad.—Verdict, hot Guilty.
-- Billing, a draper in the Strand, was difted
for affaulting -- Houfhold, an attorney's cies is. on
the 3d of September.
The profeentor, who is clerk to Harris, a Jew alp
toraey, (fated, that having a writ to serve on the de-
fendant for falfe imprifonment, at the fait of Mat-
thews, a taylor in the Strand, he repaired to put the
fame into execution on the IR of September; but
after calling feveral times, and the defendant being
denied to him, he left the premifes, and called Apia
on the 3d, when the defendant beat him out of doors.
it came out, on the croft-examination of the profe-
entor, that be then had on a waiitcoat which was thd
defendant's property, and which he had charged
Matthews with Realing, On being aficesl if he had
not bought it of Matthews ? he replied. " he had
bought it, but not of Matthews."
A youth, an apprentice, (wore that the waiflcoat
on the profeentor was his mailer's property.
Several other witneffes flared, that the profecutor
had behaved intolerably infolcnt, and that the defen,
dant merely turned him out of his houfe, without
Raking him.—Not Guilty.
Thomas Wallis, Ann his wile, Thomas Armftrong,
Sarah Stringer, Thomas Murphy, Ann Thornton,
and feveral others, were indifled for excising a riot
on the ix+ of September, in Whitechapel, and at.
faulting Judith Daniels.
The prnfecntrix, a ladywho takes her CUP Technlarlir
was, ti ufe her own words, amufing a child, by ting-
ing to it the favourite long of "Shepherds I have loft
my love," at eleven o'clock at nigh:. Her melodious
notes drew together the neighbouring inhabitants to
partake of her harmony. The damfel, at the light of
the innumerable fpedstors, became in a rage, and en-
deavoured to drive them to their habitations by very
rough means. She, it appeared. was however deter-
mined not to let the bufiliels drop without law, and
accordingly the next day repaired to an old friend,
whom the had nbferved among the populace, and in.
formed her, 0 That if flw would (wear a pistol was
fired at her. the would erafe her name from the lit
of rioters." The Jury viewed the whole tranaltion
is its drunken Rate, and returned the defendants
Not Guilty. -