Star.
London, England, 1827-11-07 00:00:00

THE WEDDING BIND.
•
Dr Men MARY RUSSRL 11/ITFORD.
•
Vann Acreallait's Poseur Ws Nes:::
Nay, Annie, start Wnt Para aside,
Nor strive to react the door;
When we bays ta'en a ten•mile tide.
To view the goldsmith's store!
See that gaj brooch, and bracelet see,—
And that toe glittering thing;
And loot—ob, dearer far to sae !
•
Oa this plain golden ring!
Wilt thou not look? Nay, shriek met, sweet,
Nor torn thine eyes away!
What west thou see. In you dull attest,
And this no market day? •
Tins children toddling ►ome frost mind,
lask'd -• hand in hand

_ gravely burs _ 4 j
An old wife perelid epos a weak
Beside kr apple wand! ,

A inlay buyge, grand at pace,

As ;inset indiv7sail
A band-We'd Miss, all Indlk
With bossee, sad mart, sat veil!
Aad eat live, on spavined stood,
Om View spare. and was;
Full soon May we his reverence see,—
Heaven shield the tally man!
Nay, Annie, catch net back ttty hand,
• •* • ' • Nor turn sway thine eye;
Net bass thy head, nor &Nag stand,
As the whole world-were by !
There's none to scare my trembles dove,
Or ber sweet shame to me ;
Ay, that's the very enter love,
• Aad slat the ries for me!

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, Nor. e.
Haar AND HART.
Mr. Haase' moved that an injunction which had been
treated it the Vice-Chancellor should be dissolved.--
The parties -were brothers and in pastnenhip,, by the
testis of which Frederick Hart was to have two.fifths,
esi Jacob Hart three.fifdts, of the profits of the concern.
The plaintiff filed a bill to have the partnership dis-
solved and an account takes. The bill alleged that the
defendant had drawn more money from the concern
than he was entitled to, end that he had for a long time
Withdrawn himself from the partnership affairs, and
therefore preyed that the defendant might be in the mean
time restrained from dealing with the partnership affairs.
Mr. Home now read several affidavits and letters in
contradiction, and stated that the defendant, far from
receiving more money than he was entitled to, the con•
cern still owed him several thousand pounds, which he
had advanced at the commencement of the partnership.

His absence was accounted for in the most satisfactory
manner, for he was at this moment in the ssioecountrie,
dojos all that he conk, for the benefit of the common
interre. Mr. Horne had not foliated when the Lord
Chancellor intimated his intention of rising.

CORONER OW SOUZIESET.
Mr. KNIGHT, as the Court was rising, moved that
writ ordered yesterday to be issued, should not be cart
bus operation, until the Coroner, who had been tal
by surprise, should have time to answer the aides,
The application was granted.

VICE CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Novnizza 6.
*Mr. ERSKINE, Mr. SELWYN, and Mr. C. F. WIL.
LIAMa, took their seats in this Court, as King's Counsel.

•
sown n. rug MARL Of STIRATEMORE.
In this case, which had been previously argued, the
►ice Chancellor confirmed the Master's Report, and
dismissed the Petition praying diat the Report might
not be confirmed without costs, as it appeared to his
Honour (ha both petitions were for the benefit of the
infant's estate.
COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov. 6.
This being the first day of Term, the Judges came
down to Westminster Hall at one o'clock, in their car-
riages, preceded by the Lord Chancellor as usual. The
Court was opened at half--past on-.
Mr. Selwyn, Mr. Charles Frederick Williams, and
Mr. Erskine wete severally desired by Lord Tentecden
to take their seats within the bar, they having been ap-
pointed of his Majesty's Counsel, learned in the law.

FARltabii V. CLARKS. .
The ATTORVITGIRWERAL moved to set aside the ver-
dict for the plaintiff in this cause. It was an action of
(rover, and came on to be tried before Lord Tenterden
on the 21st of July last, as an undefended cause. ' The
motion was founded upon an affidavit of the clerk of
the defendant's attorney, that he searched the cause-
hook on the 18th of July, and found that there were 104
common jury causes before it, besides 20 Special Jut ies,
which were apppinted for the 21st, 220, 23d, and 24th
of July. Ile apprised his master of this, and thinking
;t could not possibly come on so early, nobody was iu
attendance on Isaiah of the defendant, and a verdict
passed. against him for 2201. 'I here was also an affidavit
that the defendant was advi.ed he had a good defence.
The Counr granted a Rule to shew cause, upon an
fndertaking to pay the amount of the verdict into
Court within a week, and the attorney paying the Costs
of .the day.

ROE AGAINST BUNT N.
Mr. Raouceriau chewed cause against a Rule nisi
obtained by the Attorney• General. This action, which
was to be tried at the bar of the Court, related to cer-
tain ialuabk mines within the manor of Tewington, in
,Cornwall; and as the inhabitants of that county and of
Devonshire were supposed to hate a great interest in
mining questions, the rule had been obtained for having
a Jury-chosen out of Middlesex. Mr. Brougham now
proposed that the Jury should come kern Hertfordshire.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL said, that as the trial was
Robe at bar. and must therefore be in Middlesex, it
would be less expense to have a Jury from that county,
and there were within it, especially since the last Jury
Act, a greater mass of Gentlemen likely to be unin
guenced than in any other county.

• Mr. -Rao ma A sr.-however, objected to Middlesex, and
again proposed Hertfordshire, to which, at last, the
Attorney General consented.

TUB KING V. LINDON.
Mr. Booty:mast showed cause against a rule obtained
ay the Attorney General for an attachment against tbe
defendant fur nut attending, pursuant to his subpoena,
at the Cr.ti Bailey, on the trial of Owen Daventry, in-
dicted for a capital felony. The charge against Da-
sentry, who was a postman, was for secreting money
enclosed by Lindon in a letter. Lindon attended at
])ow-street, where the prisoner was committed on the
capitol offence, and Lindon was served with a subpoena
to give evidence at the trial, and was also bound over
it a reengoiiance. Lindon attended at the Old Bailey,
gad remaioerl an hour, when he was obliged to go to
ethe ion fora call of nature, and during hi* absence the
trial come on; he was called upon his subpmna; it was
staid that the Court waitet.for him nearly an hour, and
it was Oinuated that in consequence of his non-appear-
sure the paisomer was acquitted. Mr. Lindon% affidavit
set fprso BLit the prisoner was afterwards pied upon
41454.11130 if Pfft.gge**hen he attended sad gave pre-
cis!, the -same evidence be would have dawns on the
capital chwpc, tag the prisoner was acquitted. Mr.
Brougham hoped OA this, if eat a sufficiunt excuse,