Star.
London, England, 1829-03-10 00:00:00

other things it was said that childien were quartered
and their Wools butat-wiLaughtes). This docisseut, •
said the Hon: Verftleittati As sus posted- up and circulated
in BIM city of 114th; cisMilation was stopped by
'the Ofagittrater. ME he right, thon, -Or was be senor&
whebhesitated that there were arts uteri to excite the
public mind, which the Han. Gentlemen who resisted"
the measures of the Government would. be thsfset to
stigmatize and (flimsy? Bbt,;whltertbis was %the *gei- •
neral character of such documents, there were also mis-
takesmade which were,
.at least, a little amusing. A
book had been lately published on the present state of
Italy. It was dedicated to..the Member hr. Oxford,
and was a journal of the clas►ic tour of an exclusive
Protestant. Tie tuthot had seen inscribed on a build-
ing the Words, " Io ponorem beats et deipais wit ginis."
He rersarted,-that no Protestant ceuld.go to that cton-
•uy sithout seeing religion insulted,. as that inscription
meant that the Virgin Vas equal tirGoo--:(Lattghter).
Sir EDWARD KNATCH BULL was not about to
follow the example which the Hon. Gentleman had set;
but the Hon. Gentleman had read 'a paper and seidthat
that paper was placarded in Bath in support of the prin-
ciples of those who were opposed to the Catholic Claims.
•He could mune the House that he had no knowledge
of any such documents; he thought they *ere put up
for the purpose of injuring the Cause they professed to
support—(Hest). No man in his senses would advocate
the cause in such a manner—(Hear). As he did not '
think this the proper time to discuss the matter, he
should only refer to one observation which the Hon'
Member had made, and to which he would give a di-
sect contradiction. He had spoken with triumph of
what he had called the glorious majority in the House
of Commons. He did not 'deny that there warm very
great majority, nor •could the Hon. Member say that
they had not a respectable minority; and he contended
►hat. if those who had fwmerly advocated the Protestant
cante had continued to oppose this invasion of the con.
stitution, there would have been a considerable majority
On his side—(Hurl.
. .
Mr. DENISON said, that as the Hon. Baronet, the
Member for Oxford University, had alluded to the
election in the year BIC he had only to say that be
(Mr: Denison) that yeir atartectfot Surrey, expresslyas
the friend of Catholic Emancipation. Oa that ground
he obtained a considerable majority. This, however,
was not the purpose for which he bid risen. After the
debate on Friday night he hid occasion to go W the
county which be bad the honour of representing,' and
found that 'preparations were making for a county
meeting, to Petition on the subject of the present mea-
sures. He was determined to promote ;hit meeting,
because he thought it wai the duty of every Gentleman
,to state the matter fairly to the people. At the same
- tinsel* must deprecate the practices which were made
u..c of to inflame the public mind by such papers as that
he held in his hand, and which be was sure creep Gen-
tleman in the House would disclaim. It 1111(1.1*es-cis-
culated is the neighbourhood to which he lfad'alluded.
It was headed' "Queen IVl.sty'a Days," and cblitained
nine pilots. of the horologe in Smithfield.
thought this was not appealing to theiatelligeataatitbe
peoisie, but to their worst passions.
Mr. C: PALLMER ai d that, after the allislosii cf
his Him: Colleague, he must beg the indulgence-of the
noose ; at the-same time that be- sheeld apologissfoi

• -
the irregularity of a discussion on the general subject
at present. His llbn. Colleague did' him but common
justice in admitting that he did not. believe he (Mr. r.)
tied any knowledge of the handbill to which he had
alluded; bet when his Hon. Colleague had talked of
the influence of ouch papers on Ottnty meitingi; • he
thought be should wait until the county *feting _should
take place,,and lace his constituents. He had appealed,
and rightly appealed, to the Right Hon. -Gentleman
opposite to him—for that Right lion. Gentlemarhad:
taught the people that questions of. this itand
gained by. excitement—be had taught them. i lessou
arlich they would not leans, that • they must maktt •&-
choice of evils; and, if he• was chtermined to proceed
in hi, prment cruise, the people might. in return, if they
chose to follow the example which had been set by the
Right Hon. Gentleman, make a choice of evils which
would make him lament that course. He would beg
to remind the House that it was in consequence of the
present measures that the .country was in a state of ex.
citation. That excitation did not exist before those
measures were introduced. He hoped it would not
continue—he hoped the discussinn would be confined
to that House; but he would repeat, that the public
feeling was excited by the shameful measures which
;were puroued, aggravated and embittered—if it could
'be aggravated and embittered—by the cruel mockery
of ineffectual teCilfitirt.

Lord ALTHORY said, that when the Honourable
Gentleman (Mr. litillatei) had desired his lion. colleague
to face his constituents, he abluld have'recollected that
his Hon. colleague had told him that at the election he
had freely stated the course he would Otiose with.te-
gard to that measure. He would beg to ask the Hon.
Gentleman whether he had stated to his constituents the
course which he would.take?—(Hear).
Mr. C. PALLMEIt Arieved to obtrude hinseelt again
on ate attention of the H iuse; but he would apical-col
awy Gentleman in the House whether hecould hear the
appeal which was made to him by the Noble Ls/stand.'
',Main silent ? 'What was his reason for giviog no opi-
•nicn at the election? It was bettiesr he dictained to
task into that. House pledged. • If be had chosen
gibe hit renriments on that subject he wenld have had
:twice the number of votes which, bad returned him He
appealed re any Honontable Grvislensan acetetainted
with the circumstances if that was not the case? But it
.it Wiil Vl' kit said that it was a disgrace to a Member to
.ecribe unpleased into the House. he would beg to now
how this could be considered a deliberative assembly?
He 'chaos ledgeJbe had doubts open the snbject, and
deliberation and ui•cu,sion bad removed them.
LUSHIN 'TON congratulated the Hoe. Oen-
, .:hnan on the discovery he had made that ie was best
:for -

him to gn beim, hicintended constituents cowering'
his seal sentiments and, opinions, for (ear of giving any
oncon,tilitional pledge. He would ask, how was it poe.
',role for ekctora ar know who to town to Parliament.
if the object was, by concealing sad disguising opiH
,nions, so kw,* them in .doubt and agitation, on thel
'ground that farther efneidation was necessary, and
tots 4m a question- whit% had been discussed for the
Oast thirty "years? In reply to an observation made
lily the Honourable Member (or Oxford, advising
ores MAjesty to dotolte the Parini:tient, he would
merely reihind him of the outrages which hid
been ervortiaitied in the year 1807 when such a coarse
Wei taken, 4tid ask whether those outrages should be
wow renewed F As the Plonoorable Member bad spo-
ken of 'appealing t 4 the intelligence of the country. be
seduld beg to tcotark that a most respectable member
4 the Satiety Of Friends, and who was known to the
Sifitibni able Bifftet, had irtormed him that the peat
aujaray at that very iateiligentr boil were now in ft.
Coat of Catholic tasaneipation. This he thanght wis
rttrtirtt. prnof tri the ttiudsph of reason tad await:
ever inept** and party.
, gLLS said; that there was net in the House of