Star.
London, England, 1819-05-06 00:00:00

,114.. .
and Mekocre* Regis, egebst the Coddle
Lord EX hIOUTLI---0 Peddle from the Baugh of Hod-
ton to the same effect ,
The Bishop of LONDON—Petitions from the Madame-
ries of COichester, lie; London, and Middlesex, and also from
Sion Ceder, against the Roman Catholic Claims di*
. 4 Lord IGEN YON--e Pedtish front Weakens to theism* ,
' The Duke of BEAUFORT-4.26dd= frotw-the Clip i
*iitol and its vicioity ;
And the Bishop of ELY—e Petition from the Dean impl,pm.
ter of Ely to the amt effect.
The Life Annuities Bill passed ;tames a CanualtOtiftiet
whole Home, and was reported- .i•-. 1
The French Claims 818 was read the second time..;: It 1....
CATIIOI.IC QU)STION. . . •
The Earl of DONOUGHMOILE then ritse_to
sent a numbly of Petitions, fiat: with with_ . whic4
he had been intrusted for the purpole at 'to being?
submitted to the consideration Of that Nouse. They
were chiefly from their Lordships'.. cetlAic fellow
stibject;, who prayed that they, ts.t!.• Wit. I* completely
r.uped loin tote .tate of degr.ailkti ",iik _NO 11).0st
laws bad' P4cetthgm,44dieli44-4 - ''
*3 rrez."
;
elfirsions andAeDeiVatiOn#ffYitPg w 2 , ycoqr
tinned to 'aipierititee, ze ,i.044.*.. proper for hiN
to enter into the; Merits ittbe %sap*, . .mthc, present
occasion ; but With tee et 19 th'eXStyoner.sithetn-
selves, he could with sa..y,'t,hat,t CY,..Tfr:eignlC,4
the sentiments a the viiinhe of thii • *iihsan Citholie
population of Ireland. They were: couched' ittiimi
guage whiCh was respectful to the legislaturepgand
becoming for the' Petitioners to aff4. Tions the 'Pe-
titions which had a)ready bC *exited, an4.yet.re
nibbled to bes4teto;it aptieiredthat the number,4,
applkatione`tefteoikr;o4 the Catholics iicreemcl.
,„
wlnieThoie 40init *ern :diminished. The number
of' retirions to Parliarneftkin4ying that the Catholic
C! the rniglte tipt 'be:granted; were few and weak,,
car‘ii)Atzt**lth those *la
those been-, presented oe
foitnekitiiiitins,itiawithstaSing that cxtraordinarp
en 'b . beta thadq tl..psosuriNetitians. hoc
titintg"pec. 411.4 t., .'.Activ,Rks,fiaid;roen been
nlifein'the pl': Ptsblits. array. his Wear's
f°(4/itli" lli*f_l'f CA *4 *ukricts; b 7 Pro-
Irmse' ...
.

gOlt, flabdWi
city - 1
the sti, . the of
i'gtt• ' ;._ —that., and fie. Masla.,l4 the City , ;
of tilt clfi'St:' itimtlettitt' in 'the City of Dulalin; of the
Countrand City of Waterford 1 of ese County of Tipperary ; of
Youjhatand its Vioinerf ;a the Town and flaunty of the Town ,
of tielwatiol the Ccroty of loisaillan • of the lowa and %'I- i
eikity of on ;of Imlesailgh sod its Vi:ltsity ;of Cionmel and
its Vltifil lot the Pafsh of Newport, in the County of Tippe.
rAry :. of the thited Perillses at Swordesod Mabhide, Comity
of Dultlia ; Of the Perishes of Kikernan and 101sobbln, In the
County of 004 ; of the United Perishes of Wicklow, KU-
common, lnd Kdleika, In the County of Wicklow • of the
County At irailln (this Petition could be received as that of Ed-
ward. LYisch only, (botmbmangelse, indrisanw allied to it) ; of the
Parish Pf CfPF/111 In W Donegal; .1 the Parish of
Clonmany, in, tee Cooney at Etwiepl ; of the Parish of Glender-
mut, In the Cdunty or ilacMo•tantieerf;. of Desertakney ; of the
liniteftPirithes'of•Uppit dud Lirwes Falwa ; of the Town and
borough oblllaleetiaisidie Volta Parishes of nattiest, Clober.
brirns MIA *fleti toddle 1216,_ end Liberties of Londonderry.
Tiler itiglifiChs, .tbit•Noble Lord observed, were
from (-Vs MOT : and he. ow presented the one
from tier testants of the City of Cork, numerously
and unss,respectably signed; in favour of the Cathu:
lac' „This 'Petition was read, and with the
Cher
. ,
others,. 4,qiil.he table. :- . ' '
~ 144 ~, AP rose in consequence of its being once
. more, hi; duty to resent to their Lordships the Peti- '
tion of a Tolt,respectableclass of individuals, pray-
ing op.iseigersifrom the oppression of many pe-
nal lawfr to,Aehith they Wan. subject, for no other
rea4lo)4lll,X.csl43Cientious adherence to the religion
.. .
' - ;key ,had d
• l :educated.
•- . •

n!,
..-if lilberal \ .
ot Ibrget that many of them
of men who had contribUted to give lustre to ...
brightest periods of, British history ? Many pemi-
tious doctrines which had, been attributed to the Ca.
tholick were now admitted to have been improperly
`is teld aigrOunilS of exclusion. It was admitted by
Facile,*
CW4uc
i Nclbleriarlitt om,l* sew in his place, that the
[docuje and tor of the Roman Cativo.
,
Lilo ' °Meld, DO., • mfor, refusing thee prayer of
theitictitind:;. end 4.was tiow.ackaewledged that
;the e' on turnectgpon the point. of foreign
'itiprenlicy. It was coni.endeil that the Catholics
were Incapable of giving a full and perfect Ake
-ince in a country where the Xiog is.thelheai of tie
.Church as well as of the State. This: objection,
I.'datibted not, would, also in its turn give way to the
Itl:ireas of reason, and the increase of information
g subject, He seas encouraged in entertaining
helper not onbi from the advantage which had
been gained by the Catholic cause from the admissiop
to which he had ?laded, but from the recollection
of a measure Re ve: considerable relief having. al-
ready been coik hy Pieliament. Their Lord-
ibipi'Might iemein that in 1816, on the last oc-
casion when he had.the honour to present a. Petition
(Mai the tiglish Catholics, that he stated a case of
gleat hardship which had occurred in the naval ser-
iiki.-' He alluded to the case of Captain Wright, a
Ottittealin, whU, after six of his brothers had fallen
liit thkeause of their country, had at last, by a long
serviet and }iii' own merits, obtained the appointment
141011ster.aticl Commander. But from this reward,
se desrli phitliasicA, he could reap no advantage,
without taking en oath which amounted to the abju-
ratiOn ot his religion. When he stated this case, the
hardship was generally ackr.owledged ; and in the
year' 7817, a Noble Viscount on the opposite side in-
art:amid a •Bill for .the relief of.:lttoman Catholic
Officers of the Arnirand Navy, .brpetsing them on
the 'Salle footing with other Dissenters, who are re:.
'Fined from their disabilities as a matter of course,
round. He had seen
silent progress of this
. any opposition. He
ing this measure pass
be in substance and
. that for the propo-
istration of 1807 went out
-,, other reason than to
resting on -grounds
were sure to be ulti-
their Lordships not
assertions of the impro.
Petitioners ;.for, from

see that the same
asserted to be fraught
to the Church and Stair,
another; At an act not only of
Ilkilufasw:e had certainly
Cao irk general ; but the
irtition he-was about to,

to several oppressive
their felrow-subjects
that the Roman
countries should be placed on the
same footing *Ai what he believed no reasonable man
would" deny. Bat kwes not for that degree of re-
lief he should apply ; fin' he looked forward to no-
thing less than the admission. of .that unjustly op-
pressed class to all the, privilegnag,the British Con-
stitution. What time could be more propitious to,
the performance of such ;a act of justice than the
present? The head of that religion, so long placed
under the power of a Military and ambitious chief,'
and Therefore represented as likely to exercise a dan-
gevus influence in this country, had been restored'
to his temporal authority chiefly by British efforts.—
All apprehension on that ground was therefore done
away ; and it was to be presumed that gratitude to
this country would induce the head of the Catholic
ChUrch to accede to every 'regulation which might
be found necessary for the security of this country.
Fully' correspondent With this state of the Catholics
were the sentiments and feelings of the most ea-
lightened.portion of their Protestant fellow subjects
Upwards them. His Noble Friend had presented a
Petition numerously and respectably signed by Pro-
'iltstants in Ireland in favour of the Catholic Claims.,
'.Many other Petitions, to the same effect had come
'from different gpaitOrs. Ir this,country the cause
which he adlecatid etat tepidly gaining ground, and
their tor:Milt could:net overlook what had hap-
.

'ER POOL
Ito enter into any discussion at. present of the impor-
Ant subject to which the Petition reierred, but in
,consequence of a point which had fallen from the
Noble Earl, co which he felt it proper to offer some
naplanation. To receiving the Petition, however,
there could be no objection ;its language was proper
and respectful, and it proceeded from a body of their
fellow-subjects, among whom he knew were many
of the most respectable individuals in the country—
men whom he, for one, was ready to testify to their
public and private virtues. Whatever difference of
opihion may exist on the great question shortly to
come before the House, it arose, in his mind, upon
constitutional principles—principles which were cotir
rfitting to be maintained for the due security
e Established Government and Laws of the
Country and the Church, as connected with these
establishments. What he chiefly, if not solely, meant
however to advert to, was the allusion made by the
fra oble Earl to a recent transaction: the measurs
hich was proposed by the Government about two
rs since. The House, perhaps, was not-fully aware
at an essential difference existed between that men-

lure and another proposition which the Noble Earl
ad assimilated to it. The case of the meritorio..s
individual alluded to had, upon inquiry as to these
points, given rise to an opinion that part of these
laws should be altered, as a material difference in
such case in the practice as to the Army and the
Navy was found to exist. The difference principally
was, that in the Army those oaths were never ten-
dered to the Officers in the first instance, but they
were subject to the penalties unless relieved by Act
of Parliitment, therefore no difficulty occurred with
respect to Officers in the Army ; but with regard to
the Navy, the practice was, that, without previously
taking the oaths,-they were precluded from taking'
the commission. Previous, however, to the case of,

'Captain Wright, it appeared that no instance had
occurred for many years. It was, therefore, deemed
fair and desirable that both services should be put
upon an equal footing in-these respects ; the neces-
sary inqUiries being made, aad his Majesty's Law
Officers consulted, it was deemed proper to legalize
what had appeared to have been formerly irregular
liith respect to the Army, and to legalize a.similar
practice, prospectively, with respect to the Navy.
The Bill for carrying this regulation into effect was
therefore essentially different in sebstante ard effect
from the measure alluded to by the Noble Earl,
which was one which in fact went to repeal the Test
Laws, which they knew affected Dissenters of all de-'
seriprions, and was of that general and sweeping na-
ture as to do away in effect the operation, in an im-
portant degree, of the Corporation and Test Laws.
'The measure proposed by the former Administration,
and the legislative regulation recently adopted, were
therefore essentially different. With respect to the
subject more immediately before their Lordships,
what the Noble Earl had observed towards the close'
of his speech was right, namely, that the question.
was to be discussed on the ground of its reference to
the due security of the known and long-established
Constitution of the Kingdom.
Earl GREY spnke in explanation, and briefly con-
tended that the two measures which were referred to
*ere in substance and effect the same, though in
their re,:ults so strikingly different.
The Earl of •CHARLEMONT presented Petitions
from the Parishes, of St. John and St. Michael, in
the City of Dublin ; and from the County of Ferma-
augh ; and from two or three other places, in favour
4 the Catholic Claims.
The Duke of WELLINGTON rose to present a
Petition against the Catholic Claims from certain
Protestants of the City of Dublin. With respect to
circumstance to which a Noble Earl had alluded,
.had to state, that inquiry had been made whether
any soldier had signed the Petition ? The result of
the inquiry was, that the names of no soldiers were
affited to it. Ile did not mean to admit that there
was any objection to soldiers signing such a petition
as this as individuals, but as the fact was that they
had not, it was not necessary to discuss that question.
The Earl of DONOUGHMORE rose, he said, in
-consequence of what was stated by the Noble Duke,
who he understood to be certain that no soldier had

the Petition. It might be 7that no signature ,
.6 the kind had appeared to the Petition as far as,
his knowledge went. He thought it very difficult,
if not impossible, that such a thing could be so known ;1
the I,le Duke weant to assert the negative
knowledge, that no soldier had been
sign the Petition, or that no regimen-
order from a commanding officer had ,
relative to such a proceeding,. then he I
Donoughmore) would refer to such an allega-1
trusted the Noble Duke was able so to state;
statement of the kind was made he would
believe that attempts were made to get
of soldiers. He had reason to. thin'
occasions means were tried to seduce
sign Petitions, the nature and effect of
knew nothing about. His Lordship al-
, where attempts of the kind were made
ignatures at the depot, and even to pro-
',Charity schools in;lreland..
WtLLINGTON explained, that, in
what hadleen said on the occasion
inquiries were made of and by the
competent regularly to ascertain the
certainly appeared from the information
'.-no orders were given to any soldier
`sign his name; that upon examina-
. 6/no soldier was fund attached to it;
felicitates= was made for the purposeto any
uor were there any papers sighed,authoritt-
Ns part of the Blue CoatMospital to pro-
Nsi as alleged. Inquiries. be these points
inade; and he could state Ott such
which 'stated as alleged were false and

f44k bke,

the inforrnat'on so obtai,o
ly conceived he was autl.x
whatev,:t had signed the I
Ached for the purpose
•
over him.
11.LE11ONT e7tered into
corroborning t 1 statemc
_ Earl of Doncugitrnore) et
tverted to some proceedings
the A rtillery 13arracks, thee,
soldiers 25 to their non-at:
~es; and he stated, it apps
.tames were signed which
be erased. could aver.
_asses to the Petition were lir:
suchpe- rbons as the parties represented thernsci,
he, and that some wbo lived in the county of
low Were seduced into signing Peitions which
not from that quarter. .

The Earl of 'ENNISKILLEN contended, the
undue influence or exertions were made on the
of the Protestants in Ireland to induce rirnatu
Petitions against the Catholic Claims; nor ssa,
the least attempt on their parts to stir in proo
counter-petitions, until a Noble Earl opposite
called a meeting,of the P: otestants of Dublin.
The Marquis of LANSDOWNE presented see,
Petitions, chiefly from Ireland, in support of the
tholic Claims.

The Duke of SUSSEX presented a Petitior,
Belfast to the same etExt.

The Earl of ENNISKILLEN presented a Pet
from the County of Fermanagh, signed sit
neously, he said, by 9,056 persons, amongst w
were almost the whole of the Landed Pmrie.o
the County, against the Claims of the Catholics.
presented likewise a Petitior. from the County or
naghan, signed by 20,000, witH a similar pre
which he withdrew on account of some infori
The Ncble Earl then presented another fin
Protestants of Sligo, signed by 4000
the same prayer.
Eat' FITZWILLIAM presented a Petition
the Protestants of Monaghan in favour of the Rol
Catholic Claims.
The Duke of LEINSTER presented Petit;or,s
various Parishes of Dublin infavcur of the R,
Catholic Claims.
The Earl of DONOI;OFINIQRE presented se,
Petitions in favour of the Roman Catholic C!
from Liverpool, Scc. He Lid in his hand one
the same object from a meeting at the Crown
Anchor, of which Daniel Sunman was chair
which for some informality he declined to present
r The Earl of DO,VOUGIISIO2.E. present.d a Petitio:,
Waterford against the Window Tai in Ireland, which w,
.derod to lie on the table....-.lldjourned till to-nu.rrow.
HOUSE OF COMMONS.
Mr. FINLAY brought op dof Repent of the Glasgow'
-Works Bill, which was real. !kilns moved that its It
consideration be postponed till the huh in aunt.—(web
It`r. MELLISH presented a I etition from the It habit.
Paddington artless the Harrow Road Bill.—Read and cr
to lie on the =WWI

Mr. C. CALVP.RT presented a Petition from the It
tants of St. Martin, Ald,gate, against the Fire Clergy
and ordered to lie on the fable.

Lord MILTON presented 's Petition from certain It
tants of Liverpool against the Liverpool Canal ILL—Read,
ordered to lie on the table•

Lord MILTON presented a' Petition from certain inkabi.
tants of Whitford against the PoorPs Settlement iiill.—Head -
ordered to lie on the table.
Mr. GOOCH presented a Petition from Lerma, b Suffolk,
against the Poor 's Settlement 13111.—Read, and ordered
on the table.

Lord E. SOMERSET presented a I etition from Painswick,
' Gloucestershire, against the u oar's Settlement Bill.-Read, and
ordered to be on the table, and to be printed.
Lord G. BERESFORD presented a Petition from the In-
habitants of llungarvon against the Itish Presentments MX
Read, and referred to the Committee.
Lord F. MONTAGUE presented a Petition from the Inha-
bitants of Huntingdon, praying for i.revision of the Criminal
Code.—Read, and ordered to lie on the table.
Lord GEORGE BERESFORD (as Chairman) from the
Committee appointed to try the merits of the Petition against
the Return for Truro, stated that they declared the skiing Mem-
bers duly elected; and that the Petition was neither frivolas
nor vexatious ; nor the opposition to it frivolous or vexatious.
The consideration of the Petition of General or 'Mr. Claw-
ing, complaining of as endue Return for Camelford, was pus:-
paned till the 25th of May.
Mr. LITTLETON presented a Petition from Wolvethan.p-
ton, against the Poor's Settlement Bill—Rood, and, ankred to
lie on the table.

Mr. CU RWEN moved and carried, that there be laid before
the House the number and descriptions of prosect.tioas co ec-
count of Salt Duties, for the last three years, commencing turd
the Ist of January, 1616.
Lord ROBERT SEYMOUR obtained leave of ifusenc: for
one week, on his private affairs.

,~
j:
I

1 vwcl,--axitiilst ins ilditiddc y I vormidit? nut9cvLs. uy pro- .- .
ctlAilg thesignattirei of 'chi tonkltr,-Vsts a Petition. as regularly as the year comes riz
Theieistienirr were, hoirmy q •.eointeracifd by the with great satisfaction the tiler
Pe7itiqiii:Of ale bodies qt.--. rotators; iii "different measure, which passea without a
~ __.
prti ottrelan ;' ljetait a"..
lidos ti Rife:4o.th* felr the more gratification.at stein
Le,rdihips in hFc
!moan '6f i. ‘ : Akiteip„;thed cit., of unopposed; . when be found it to I
cork: one +lad itreAf.biiii piti .170m the 6itv- effect neither more not...less than
ofghtkikin.tilglied billtijtqi-d_ 4St.hispse,l4 irsici .ling of ir;hiCh the AdnOrtistiacior
pefigris'Ofliie fifer*Nifirqb. .79.111:. that.cati.,liaigiq •Of office: !fie stated.thiatOr.no c
saltilthl4 mina, INS 4btfla i ''- ' 'O imt lilt Pe.) lbew,..t4l:l4r4ni. Prejudices, . r
res
titiciffi "ffe.wtiaiil lies lti? y e. Oar . • she
.bi whicki!..ibrikjeketAnot.,eowr Cif
the•fditdlhf 'lke/vibe& : • ; Aec tsar,
.;all couchnd .g.4e,tt4L61:91-:tinsfltt # wat7' 1
in "proOkAt4nu,' lid iia .4:the, sa* jibielxi: _t°lditutr,.. t'ftt""mt ..f ulrft ewer
wquldt'be Itillici#ii •fi .-00 oclwo ,qf slam Tr'eri'itattagg aersetto the Pd
length • The' fit 4 '.. :• .4rits.Signia bi ;,ord fr!ii‘ IQ* ,t.taillispened,. theymust
gal,'lbrkaftlit Wi'Vlijaci`tf: tli Si*. bradt..o °mufti* *r.hiCP.Wa4 a;.9Pe time as
Iretinkillibil br. --,iiiii tioinher of persons.- atrank with the. gree;eg danger. to the
a name might be gridteli at' auother At ;
and'firtii*"Avltithef 'PO • a was signed
of ,4iveit ,
,:1144 a* uct., otiottahnity win . tir .
,di " justice, but of secujitr. Os,
mfttWJVlt': Rekle4lYeiiiirior. . The Noble F 4 sea afforded great reg to.Csi olc.s,
preVented -Petitions OM the Roman. Catholics- English Catholics,
anise Piiiletis4 ' momas, fit
~ St. mos, and Ge4r!fi:. present, still remainedwhole .pequo;
ned sub)ect to
Du4inirlotttliei Dalin/ Jefi •of the Cr.uity redC y laws from the operation of which t
of ritrif
e 41;) .1! *O4 Sti (Anirizine, in the City of Dubin; in the sister kingdom were free
of 49011 Nez. ip the (Sty of Dublin;Parish the Parish Catholics Of tiotfi countriei shoal,
gi: of: t !ft._ An*,:r4, Si. Manikin Ow Clty of Dublin ;
~ c ."
..,,. 1..,. " L,.
...-.,,..„.:,

, II • ••••••
had
1 -1-
.. --- i '7,1" butiiibl
i., voc.ii tkey • been educated. They then lore pened en Midday night in another pace, w ere a the Nobl
• agaiiLiamforwaxd to request that their case might motion in favour of the; Catholics had been lost only from his own kn
be t*o.„usc9 coansiderationy.and.dutt they might be fiy a- majority`
~ twp; 'This was a decision which called upon to si
perinitttp4;,t9.oeinjoyethe -full benefit of the British could not fiiikYd, iliiihred most strongly the prayer -tat order, or on
• . Vontlittffifn,Plß°4°Pilerwilkdleir ProtesOnt lino*. Ordiesi Petitlf;ti' their Lordships' serious conside- been made' rela
;
• .slibkr.4 0 Ais.Wavoles nearly the same- words, the. tatioh. • Thepeace.lretimsted, would be of long du- (Lord Donoughi
~ •- -• samer • 4..;tthichwesi . humbly and respectfully istiorm. but their, Lordships surely could not have tion. He trusted
.i. ' : • made parp.eco;,ead Which be then had the ftitsigb9l2o- the Many' ertibirrasstrients which had du- for until a states
honom ;•gclt . ' tsr. • . Lordship/. - The-pre. ring late contest been eiperienced in consequence continue to bell
1 • ' sent.l%um.~ . Alf
of m. sm sr n4tßqdy. ..ability, Gouty, great hhped that-the prespedt of war was remote; but, as. that on other °c
La/444er5,„ *4; Owe.: of the Roman Catholic 'statesmen, they could' at avoid looking forward to soldiers to sign
religfun.!— ;ft. . fe'R, OA :110,1mode.as he was instructed the possbility of such an event. With France on which they knee
• "to gimp', j
to-c. , • .4 0,41262 L !squesentaticin of 'the the pne side, and America on the other, would it,be, bided to cases w
- Roman t; 6; • -.: 41,6 I, and whether this Pe. 'Uri", to expose Ourselves to all the evils of intermit to procure signs titiosiy•fe ;! . •:, retpect.to the character of dlicoittent, stoat with the thanes-of war with eitlier- one them. at chi
4 the R2Ftrit
.• •- - : .it Same, the nature-and ob- of theiePniverk-r. Who maid be certain. thaieheml ',lnc Duke of.'
ject 07, *4 . etuatow Abotime. at which it sal pre. Usal to Oteft.i!, just demands might not same time consequence of
senteli; there Mures had been-err any occasion, ad lip- -tor ether pfddistre
.niovenient,s,:of despair ? Such a. alluded to., inqu
. plicitioit.sediitotheir Lordships which was curl teshiltwait &Mists:tit with human nature. He wished, cers the most c
, _,_ ,_ .
to nygo,splsl4l gonsicietatiog. It was not necessary; %vets it ontheir Lorasrups eemaderal .taCtS, and it cert
nor •fm.tbi,she•fit time, for him to repeat drearier& is ' 'it would be wise to defer ft' such ape: obtained ,that -n
merit' be ,pad. formerly urged; for indpcing -their . the Making a coe4ession wbishoit 'the .present rikhase.ver.so teis
LorclWips to acquiesce in 'the prayer of this Petititm; t osehl 4 be retie red as a- boon. 'The measure tion,.tbe unit)
nor Would he in any degree anticipate what propeil • d''Wlkski all the . e with which it:might duo no selicitati
belonged Cothe discussion of the question of wht Le griptted; and in y. less advan- aolditr; nor wer
boa tilliti - '
his treble Friend near him bad given notice.• He irsipiuss inistilat'qi". *Utley. The Roman Catholics tivel nn ths.pai
.
woull onlx now say, that the truth -of the opinions m bhglandihatr.theot manifested. stodent sub- core issa,to—rgst
on this' subset, which he had so often unsuccessfully mission to 7*s's Of the' most unjusa.ind• oppress' 'nl
urged; became by every thing which had passed i nature. If loyety and attachment to ihe Coosti?k.ve Pubwerelk:ertatill viyL
• • • - , f
I e.
- ....:iii...- . ..
-.
. . fillidili -- - - .... .- . • . r.ll

•
subjects, if the Wt,kW Ilisch,ne scandalous. From th
'..ZAMENTIOCEE over
his
head.
13
. Iriaßyommllen3eidirntinlimoitilmommLite ire- tn 4441
6 Witriiitii dad
recomethead th‘Wll tOnside, _ - GPce .said he humbly
• • .—.—
HOW OF WADS, MAI & . ~:
.4..pr-1...,0cie5,,T.utidei7..:...... ~40:theTilailatimwtort11.11.1111"011,41:101:the: . IllaithatiemascoosideratisamotlaftkilliSjiw,hz
tbitherWlol. . .
Aohiditif
Batianiell;:de.r...:oo .to sao,hyoarthdhaaatdunothbesillydsoioeirvicc
After eke isillelal business woe 5,;(i. •• •
•The Dike of Lwasimus, ads I , • .
Mieliowwit and ale foe tir• ad. littinftsigt -•- • tkperaat : sirsi4d Sadly mg apmadlly oiled :Men otnchehavictor eilitiellesiitrily free. ' The Earl of CHAR
diets seam . I.„,___,'"•l•l3'"l' •'4 - ttweed. - ThiS Item !tits founded, not only sn the froth objection • bit this be wouldessert, that the re- !detail, with a view of
IA" altaterimsievo.lllloA4olool,"Tkeen conduct of the CEMrcs theinseteekt bet bids. map., gitia .tehicilt tubed its Mowers to such virtues his Noble Friend (the
agaladt die Mita&
Vbccetat •OLIN:FM.I44
', . aow ,viction that the opponents of thiii r daiMll.-'4ailf)di mot .to side& the* who profess It from pri- occasion. He advertc
kwovair imiliettetet''' ' ' '_.•
." • !Mashed- Those wbo.bad Altheste heitalltale Ilos- v4egeo..enjoyed under the Briush Constitution by have taken place at till
ns mid of ftitArniarruiTals 'row & San Waft- tile to the Catholic', were ready* aeknorZle their every other class of men. He concluded by present- which were givue to o
tord,xalstet the Catbelie.tisi. theriu as fellow-subjects... liiiiiiid who • .deny lag a Petition aligned by a'gmat number of Roman ante on Orange Lodge
Marquis of Okklo
supfeet it the at
Clelihis - 4 l" 4l" 'Mitt"' is their loyalty and- attachment to the Constitution, Catholics, praying for the removal of the disabilities that to some papers n:
Berl DIGBY—a Patin= fratil&neWe &elf liberal employment of the wealth they possess, under' which they labour. . • found afterwards to be
and Meicocrce Regis, whist the- -• • . or fbrget that many of them were the- descendants The Earl of LIVERPOOL row, not, he observed, many of the sign?turei