Star.
London, England, 1819-06-23 00:00:00

,issioned upon
fence that which he (,
- not, he contended,
public man who
fully, to discharge ,
whether he had or had
he had imposed upon himself,
lad not lurked or waited
l)ure he had proposed, till I
by the notice made at the
,e, Ile should then do hi,
,re, that he had manfully
Jolts to the measure proposed
among other reasons which
it, the chief and principal one was; that it
scribed a limitation to the powers of the Certi.
~aners, and he therefore moved for the reap.'
intent of the Committee.. This he had done, be-
J-e he thought it of the last importance that the
~,mmissioners should be backed and supported.—
certain charities were exempted. it only afforded
...itional grounds why the Commission of Enquiry
should be enlarged. in order that general and tom.
'-te information might be procured. The Right
ion. Gentleman (Mr. Peel) had however, discovered
• a Committee against which so many objections
:ere raised, had shewn what were the best means of
preventing beggars from loitering about the streets
rags and indigence. There was one clause which
' originated with the late Mr. George Rose ; and
, being thought exceptionable, was subsequently
lunged. The Right Hon. Gentleman charged the
:ommittee with transgressing the prescribed limits t
I said, that while they were employed on public
:rides, they had, at the same time, extended ler
luiries to Westminster School • who would have
.cured to do so? who would have supposed that
they could possibly be induced to call the master of
school before them ?—(Here the Honourable and
Learned Gentleman was\ informed, that it was the
"'tarter House School.)—Well, Charter House or
(estminster School, it mattered not, the principle
was the same with regard to both. But it was for
bins (Mr. Brougham) to reflect with surprise, and
raise eyes with wonder, that the Right Hon. Gen-
tleman had not said a single word on this subject,
• the Session of 1816 ; nor had he evinced the least
icitude about it, till this present Ses.ion of 1819.
had, however, clearly proved, that he himself
as right, and the Right Honourable Gentleman
icing. It was true, that the Right Honourable
mtleman had not, in 1816, an opportunity of read-
the Reports, as they were not printed at the tone;
~ when the Committee was revived in 'lbl7, and
isen the Reports were printed, why did not the
,fight Honourable Gentleman's earnestness display
itself? In that year, when the condition of the poor
'. over the country was truly deplorable, he had not
opened his lips upon the present question; and this
was the more remarkable, since it was then opposed'
the Right Honourable Gentleman, the Member
Liverpool, in a most determined and' forcible
manner. The only one then silent was, the Member
- Oxford; and it might be fairly supposed, that he
is looking,- at the tune, to that exaltation which he
aterwards attained--(ther, hear.)—lflils.-ears were
then closed to the sounds that invaded shein, at least
eyes ought not. to have been shut to the scenes
which he must have beheld in every quarter ((rheas.)
Why did he nOt then raise his voice in favour of.
Westminster and the Charter House ? /416, he trever
once appeared to entertain a thought upon the sub-
ject,- or to look at those inroads which he now so
much deprecated—(Hear).—He (Mr: 13;ouichaml
succeeded in getting the Committee revived; Without
a single dissentient voice. A year passed away with.
out any step being taken by the Right Honourable
Member; 'and another year had' also elapsed, with-
out stimulating his zeal, though, he must have beert
well acquainted with all the circumstances ccaa,
netted with the measure ; and intimately acquain•
ted with facts which were publicly detailed in every
part of this vast metropilis—(Hear, hear, hear).—
With such evidence before his eyes, it was.too much
for him now to come forth, pretending the innocence
of ingenuous astonishment. Had he been inspired-
by zeal in the discharge' of his;dtity, he. would have
thought it necessary to guard, as much as be coild,
against the innovations of Parliament; and had this
zeal been kept alive by the spirit of an ardent patrio.
tism, it would have blown _up the Committee alto.
gether ; yet since the members of that Committee
were fortunately yet left unconclemned, they were de-
termined to do all in their power to rehlize the pur■
pose for which they had been appointed—(Hear,
hear, and a laugh.)—The Honourable Member here
observed Mr. It. Martin smile., and said he was pee.'
fectly sure that the Honourable Member for Galway'
was prepared to concur in every thing'that had fallen
from die Right Honourable Gentleman beside him—
(d laugh.) He could not help saying, however, that
much isarmony of opinion was not to have Leen ex-
pected by the Committee alluded to, composed as it
was of men of different political views,, and different
political feelings. Of the twenty-one Members who
composed that Committee, no less than sixteen were
known to vote invariably on the other side, and these
sixteen were to be encountered by the remainintfiver
who might be termed the Heratii of the. Corrunittac
It being here observed, that there were only three
Horatii, the Honourable and Learned Member said
that he was well aware of that, but wished to take
te same number which Hon. Gentlemen on the other
side had not hesitated to take when making out their
Horatii. He.then mentioned the following among
those on. the Committee, who differently
from those on his side of
. the others were to be set
squad, there being one,
whom he knew not how
reagh, the Chancellor of
Wahraham. Mr. H., Davies,
fir G. F. Hill, Ike. There
voted one way nor the other,
against such a division.
perhaps, with the. other .
there was' one Honourable
who constantly gave his support to
without doubt, from the purer
ciotives. It would be unseeml:
Paeral and independent Member
public conduct had always been
Judgment and disinterested feeling}.
Learned Member then proceeded to
other points contitieedin the.seee
;eutleman, Inainylningther

.mpossible. ..e public t..
be dispatched within the regular time, from the vast
number of papers to be printed. Ii was, he contended,
evincing an utter ignorance of Parliamentary Pro-
ceedings, for the Right Honourable Member to ob-
to any such.letters having been written by him.
He dwelt in the next place on the letter which he
bad, in the course' of the present Session, addressed
Ott the Clergy for information, respecting the state
if education all over the country—observing, that his,
principal object iu having written to them, was the
desire of possessing a perfect knowledge on:the sub-
ject ; not only with regard to the nation at large, but
also as it concerned every town and hamlet in th
lingdorn. It was unnecessary for him to observe, he
said, in order to satisfy the minds of all those who'
knew him, that he had never, in ,any instance, as-
sumed an undue authority, with regard. to this
measure; nor should he here think the imputation
,worthy of notice, were it not that he was anxious
to convince those to whom he was -unknown, that::
it was utterly undeserved---(Cries of hear, hear.)—e,
The circulars addressed to the clergy were in the
form of requisitions officially issued by him, as Chair-
man, and were not couched in the language of fa-
vour, but in the ordinary forms of orders to compel,
them to answer all questions. These documents had
been charged with a character of equivocation ; now
there were only two modes in which requisitions
from Committees were made out, directed to the
persons, either saying, " it is ordered," or " yoU are
required to attend and give evitience." He siquld'
ask, was there any thing in the requisitions issued by
him, that did not come under either of these defini-
tions? Again, it was said that the clergy were not
bound to give answers to certain questions which
were put to them. He contended that they were
bound, and it was under a strong feeling that their
evidence was necessary to the attainment of the ob
sects of the Committee, that the circulars had been
tutted, a species of summons resorted to, in order to
save expense. He had now, he said, nearly gone
through all the charges made in the Bill of Indict-
ment preferred against him by the Right Honourable
Gentleman; before he concluded; however; he begged
to be indulged in one observation in answer to the
charge of his having converted • chi Eittnriticii,Com-
mittee to political or electioneering purposes. It
bad been said, that he had: so far forgotten the trust
imposed upon him as Chaii man, as even to make
the minutes of that Committee ?üblic, to answer
private ends. In refutation of this, he denied hav-
ing ever given any facility of access to those mi-
nutes, or even to his own notes.---(Hear, hear).—
Roach conduct as this he reprehended as Much as any
one, though it had not,escaped his recollection that
there was already on the Rego*, of that House a
precedent to which he could appeal:fer_kistification.
he instance to which he alluded, was one' wherein,
the %Mates of a. Committee, which fur greater. secrecy
*ad been impounded by.the !'ere by a Flight
Gentleman in that House. seat to the.
West ladies with a view to operate to the disadVa*
tagesof.; the (itentleman opponent.-(Hear, hear:).
*sing now been permitted at such length to vindip
cate.himself..he expressed his gratitude fqr the indul-
gence, at the same time assuring the House, that
nothing but an-absolute obligation imposed upon him
induced him-to do so. The effort he hid made was',
es painful to him as it must appear tedious to them,
but it was the effect of compulsion.. Perhaps, too,
the necessity of standing out against a serious charge
in his own and his friend's defence, totally unpre-
pared, had induced greater prolixity and less effect
than it otherwise would if he had not been taken so
completely by surprise—dear, hear). He had en-
deavoured not to pass untouched a single count in
be Bill of Exceptions ; and if through oversight any
one had been overlooked, from which an inference
would be. drawn that he was unable to meet it, he
said he would be eternally obliged to any one who
would give hinl notice of it, when his strength was
at another time more equal so the effort; and then
concluded by saying, . as well cm his own. Fait as
Chairtnin, as for every individual Membet of that
Committee, that so far from shunning publicity, they
.nly courted inquiry, and were anxious it should take
place as soon as possible—(Hear, heap.)
Mr. SHELDON bore testimony to the conduct of
the Honourable Gentleman who had just sat down, in
his, character of Chairman of the Committee.
Mr. V. FITZGERALD then, ose, and in observing,
:upcsalbe vindication of himself, just offered by the
Honourable. and ',earned Gentleman. Who had- sat
doWn, said he was surprised to set that coaverte4l
into an engine
,of accusation agalisst his Right. Hon.
Friendldr. Peel), In saying I.!as tar nook
wishing to see that 'right abridged ; but there ems to,
the present case 4. tope 9f !arc,suk iu the language;:
and a train of insiutiapons, npon.the course adopted
by that Honou,rible Genklemats iphich amounted to
an absolute charge--(Hear).% -11 e Honourable and:
the

sarcasms
the , a tion of his
(Mr. Peel.)—(Heer, ~ ,-.)—lt Nil
a ground, that nq observations h
the Report of 1816, to which
cessaryto say, that it could not be done, for the
proper documents were not then upon the table. It
was not of .any particular exercise of undue autho-
rity that his Right Floaourable Friend complained,
it was of an accumulated assumption of power, which",
a fear that it would be made a precedent, atone in-i
duced him to stand forward and reprobate—(Hear,,,
Gear.) hear.)—lt • was not competent to him to justify his'
having acted, after the end of the Session, to alledge i
that the papers ordered by-the House, had not at the;
time been printed. There was no precedent in thsi
annals of Parliament to bear him out in that. Then,
infrrespect to the circulars which had been issued, with
a view, as he termed it, to perfect d " digest," and
for which he had no authority at 04 the only espla...,
nation he gave was, that it was his opinion that he'
was right in so doing. Would such an explanation
be deemed satisfactory by the House ?—(Hear, hear.)
He was willing to take the disclaimer of that Hon.
Wltearned Gentleman to any charge made against
lit as a sufficient answer; but really he could not`
belp saying his explanation had been very insufficient]
(Hear, hear !) if it was painful to him, as he pro=
fessed it to be, to be uncles the necessity of shielding
himself from charges, it was no less so to those w
a paraniount .sense of public duty obliged to prefer
them. That he had not before done so, arose not
from a desire to shrink from it, but because no op-
portunity occurred of doing it with propriety. And.
here he cotdd not help observing,• that there was as
little discourtesy' in it as the circumstances of the
case would admit. He then said, the Honourable
and Learned Gentleman had always shewn too much
sensibility on this question, making every allusion to
the proceedings of the Education Committee as 'per•
sonal to•himself, and concluded by giving it as his'
opinion, that the conduct of that Committee had been
such as to warrant all that had been said by his Right
Honourable Friend (Mr. Peel). .
Mr. F. DOUGLAS, as a Member of the Com-
• ittee, eulogized the conduct of the Honourable
Chairman. He said it was uncandid to bring for-
ward now,, uncalled for charges against a Commit-
tee which was no longer in existence, and that the
time had'elapsed when they could properly 'be made,
He then vindicated the mode in which the Commit-
tee had been appointed, saying that Gentlemen at
that side of the House were as incapable of lending
themselves to private ends, as any other Members ot,
the House, and that the Committee, in examining
witnesses, had not exceeded their authority., as it was
usual, when a Committee had not finished their Ret
port, to continue to take evidence to enable them to
perfect it.
] Lord CASTI,.EREAGH said, he was not surptized
that his Right Hon. Friend (Mr. Peel) had viewed
this question in the light he did, from the light I.*
twhiCh it had heretofore been placed by the Honour►
eble and Learned Gentleman opposite. It was trtisk
it discussion arose :out of It, 'which was apparently
foreign to that immediately before the House ; but
when a Instinct charge Of tepidity and remissness hid
teen made against •his IY4esty's.Goyemment, a rer
tort should naturelly be expected.. He thee said,the
expense which the 'verltionOf
.this ir, 1 I Would be
productive of, could be no'objettiola to it, as money
could not be betterlaid ' out than iii" examining into
]end collecting the abuses' in" charitable foundations.
He found himself in rather a strange situation now,
when advocating a clause in it which. had
.been Pro-
posed last Session by .the Hon6urabfe-ind Uarned
tentleman himself i for, extepeiti-having Special
visitors, it was precisely the sank-. HCigtield not,
then, think it either noxious or alarming -wile's- pre.
posed and urged by this great•defender of Pnblic.
Charities, and there was no difference now from the
circumstances which existed *then. This Bill went
no morithari to assist fhb Court of Chancery, and
did not propose to interfere where there were special
visitors. It was better than the Bill of last Session,
inasmuch as it gave the Commissioners a power to
obtain evidence, and held out means of immediately
correcting any abuses, without- resorting to the tedi-
,pus and extensive process. by stamps, or the inter-
ference of the Court of Chancery.
Mr. PEEL said, the reasons which induced the
Hon. and Learned Gentleman (Mr. Brougham) to'ad-
dress the House a second time, operated equally with
him—(A cry of Spoke! front the Opposition Benches.)
If he was out of order, he hopiii the usual indul-
gence of the House, when charges were brought,
would be extended to him. The Honourable Gentle.]
man opposite (Mr. Douglas) was pleased to say that
hp (Mr. Peel) came forward unnecessarily and un-
called for—( Hear, hear.) - -
• Mr. J. SMITH rose to order. There was no mo.
. ' before the House. Though the Hon. and Learned
to
. aleman (Mr. Brougham) commenced his speech
stating, that it was his intention to conclude it by
31.1 notion, he did not do so. The Hon: Gentleman
Opposite (Mr. Peel) he would submit, was not there-
' there being • before the
• last spoke.
iHAM -

with a direct
corruption to the Heads c
ceiv4 he lead just right to get up ana
characteiltithene +end, were constituents, and the
character of-thar seminary for which .be entertained
a romantic attachment. He also strongly condemned
the act of tilhoilending forth a circular letter by a per-
son calling himself-Clerk to the Committee. He
did not'repent of having brought forward this mo-
tion ; he did so from a sense of• public duty, but he
believed he was the last man in that House, against
whom a charge of want of candour Could be made.
Mr. WILBERFORCE declared, from his own
knowledge, that most gross abuses prevailed in tbi
University; and he took blame tohimself for
having called the attention of Parliament for
years to those abuses, with a view to their cynexpftee,
He did not see any thing improper in the condigt of
the Committee. or in the qiiestions put by his Hone
tad Learned Friend to the witnesses. He congratu-
lated the House on the very benefc:al progress al-
ready made in this great cause ; and. it was entirely
owing to the indefAtigable diligence and perseverance,
as well as to the great talents, of his Learned Friend
(Hear.) Some years .ago; ha himself had brought
forward a measure for the registration of Charities;
and in the course:of inquiries which afterwards took
place, he had discovered the most shameful abuses ;
and it was high time that the funds of the abused
Charities *should be applied to their proper purpose.:
Mr. SMYTH (of Cambridge) said, he had been,
in 1815, appointed a Member of the Committee, and
did every thing in his power to promote the success
of its labours ; but had left off attending it, during
the years 1817 and 1818. Ide did, however, think,
that the Members of the Committee had exceeded
their powers, in putting unbecoming questions to
witnesses—(Hear, hear),—at the- same time he la-
mented the unprovoked discussion brought forward
by the Right Honourable Gentleman.
Mr. JOHN SMITH declared that the most scow
dalous statements had been publi bed respecting the
Committee, and against his Learned Friend, who hash
done more to support the cause of humanity and jus-
tice, than any thing that ever wa,s done by the Right
Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Peel): and, with regard to him-
self, the proudeit part of his life was that of his flaw,
in been a Member of the Education Committee....
With respect to the Fellows of Colleges refusing to
disclose their Statutes, he had only to say, that
Wherever there was. a disposition towards conceal-
ment and mystery, there was always something cor•
ttps' and vicious lurking behind,(Hear.)—This was
fite sorerbf practice pursued by the Members of the
Universities ; and it was very differe :t from the con-
duct of the SoCiety of Friends, called Quakers ; for
at the time the enquiry was going forward before the
Committee, several of these persons came, and ex.
pressed the strongest wish that the whole system of
their Scholasticlnstitutions might be enquired into.
' The clause was then brought up, and having been
read, iris added by Way of rider to the Bill.
hgr. BROUGHAM then brought up a clause, ex-
..ng the Commissioners from making a • Report.
lOther House of Parliament, that drawn up for the
ing in Counc a being deemed sufScient.—This clause
'Was agreed to. .
' Mr. BROUGHAM next proposed an Amendment
to the body of• the• Bill, to rake away the exception
in- the' Bill to visited Charities, and in doing so he
said he would not retract a word he had said with
respect 'to the abuses which existed in these institu-
tions.• The greater number of them arose from
negligence alone ; but of a very large portion cul-
pable negligence would be found to be the cause,
eyen amountingfri some cases to gross corruption.
Iti-thenpirritin hAttad thus.'expressed he was supported
'by the .pretient.'.Laril Chancellor and. the late Lord
Kenyon ;...apdbacked-asbe was by these great autho-
rities, he was disposed to anything rather than loWer
his tone.

Sir W. SCOTT objected to the amendment, prin-
.cipally on the ground that the visiters would be re-
duced to mere nominal officers. lie represented the
evil consequences of any interference on the part. of
.the Commissioners in such Institutions ; and intimat.
ed that disputes Might arise between the parties,
which might be most prejudicial to the Establish..
ment, tb protect which was the sole object of the
Legislature. •
Mr. SCARLETT confessed that he saw none of
those evil consequences 'which had been so strongly
enforced by the last speaker. It was'to be recollected
that these Commissioners would make no new laws;
their object would be simply to institute inquiries.—
He put a case hypothetically : Where the Trustees
had neglected to put in force the laws of the founder
of the institution—was not this, he asked, a case
which ought to be inquired into ? He really sow
every reason to support the Amendment.
Mr. BATHURST opposed the amendment.
Mr. ELLICE strenuously Supported the amendment.
The House then divided—For the original words of
the Bill lOT—For. the Amendment 75—Majority 92.

. . - _ - , . . • • .
.... • 1 . . , .... . . .
. .
.. • ,
-.• .. . _
. . - • -1
, .
- .
that occasion, 46 manifestly to •• . •
• •
Persoludlitrespect towards the visitors of Pocklitrg- eons than onerverl be` haticlirightemi.nsbutigtee• , dila the conduct of the e Committee
Mr. Bronghatn) had gtveb. Itdistionrecti?on •
neon!
oil, immaterial to his auraeter, ton §chool, though he couttpot be answerable fiir till!, he rep could not be &Urged #eitit.ureriareess in bringing Oil
onsm* cestsutahre. —Re
any ungracious questions diet' suit& live beep,' lima& he be said td irC-teltary,Plarlieleiri'AlM this discussion, here he did.so in the preens* el
41(3 was anxious, ee494411, Mil akod thews- by the \limas'," of the coraiiitiet.— br his writings hii shevitat,datt• a
age his duty to the public, to -sea the Learned Gentleasae., He maintained, that an aa-
•
d or had not been Re also vindicated hiniself &xis savers) (*kw imp-
„ap! atgadc, nod j)..p: bis letliner 'brood thority had been exercised by theCommi...tee which.ti-e
upon himself, whether lie preare
~ .. ; 1 ,
hadthe tations, isn4 adverting to certain letters which ke,basl, that he was 4 for it -:-( r Asser.)-- house had- not contemplated-at the time it appointed,
written on the measure befrore the House after e dis- Hp would not have been induced , o safthuli much that Committee ; and that the Committee bad greatly
or waited to give effect to the solution of Parliament, he argued that h was corn- in the'absenee of that but that
(Mr Brougham extended its powers. He thee read over some,
,osed, till he had been reminded petent to him to have written- them without commit- had left the House), but that 'he was
.justiged from parts of the evidence taken before the Committee
ads at the close of the Session of
hen do himself the justice to de- ting any breach of the constitution, as it was usual, his language and his sarcasms in Putting it i•t• relative to the state of the Universities, in which it
sinfully and openly stated his ob- during a prorogationgation or dissolution 'of Parliament, the shape of a vindication of his Right Hon Friers 'slew that most improper questions had been put
.
for a digest of the proceedings to be given in the in- (Mr. Peel.)--(Hear, hear.)--jt hit 4 also been taktiha • Os witnesses, with a direct view of imputing grON
ire proposed upon that occasion ; termediate time, and unless this course were adopted a ground, that nq observations had been blade upon corruption to the Heads of Cellegis ; and he con-
a.sfAns
..nig",..liie_h_i_d 2.6_ i,id_tf_a_ult it would be impossible that the public business could the e Report of 1816, to which it would be only De- ceivird he bad just right to get up and vindicate the
_

yIICU, 4.1 M a•,..,, .• ...0 ••••••••-6 Ail 01.1JW1111..G ULlall 6G..ka AWP• p .
.- ,42.... ------ -- --. -r. . ,
who always voted differently Learned Gentleman had coiacjuded his..- appeal to the fore in order' there being no new question before the 7- - ' -
WAYS AND MEANS.
the House, while some of Hoare,. by lamenting his inability to meet the charge House since he last spoke. • . On the motion that the House resolve itself into a Committee
!,t down among the neutral properly, as coming upon him by surprise, a94.inu- Mr. BROUGHAM was now about to itibtlit aof Ways and Means.
however, (Mr. D. Gilbert) roatiog at the same time that there was an iur of Motion; when - . -" ➢• Air. CALVERT objected to going on with bushiest at this
wto classify. Lor4 Castle• premeditation in his Right Hon. Wend, as if laying The SPEAKER informed him, that it could not
tati2ntr.°7l.B";‘.;;9lclb*NskOilibithereplerterndigithgeiobjection and c ini •
the Exchequer, bW. E. 8., oz wait until the fag end of ill. Saigon. Hcorevev, be received. The question before the House was, that particularly of the late hours at which fresh busties.v.:. brought
'Les, Sir Q. Clerk, Mr. Gooch, such a charge might have bean incidental to.thi die, the-B4.1), 1,4 's third time ? When that was dis- forward est nee lineocodoas: ~z , • ..
me were' some who neither cussion, it certainly, was not premeditated, so far as posed of, the Honourable (Gentleman (Mri; Peel) The CH Oh NCE LLOIL 9( the 13CCANI*R. said this arose
sr, and he therefore protested 'he (Mr. Fitzgerald), or the majority of his fries* would Wive full:opportunity of speaking if ant trout unavoidable drcivinalaicer 7 ' 7":
.•• 't ter Mae Hoist dm* wielved *WM* Ilif Commo*Peoind a Re.
Mr. Barclay
.might vote,
,about him, were capable of judging. • The Hallam.; were preied. - • ' solution wad foe granting Xte,ooo,ooo of a Loan oat
side_,_ and perhaps not, yet ~able acid 1:444r0e4 Geutlerran bAd VIA •said, that if • Mr. BROUGHAM : • isreposaillr tirlimal. the Shand` list &lithe service of theleir.
Pie Member, Sir T. Adana. such charges were to be: made she nine was. that the Tiustnek , wipil. eameeietirlye UMW*, . VstkestioreadrisOthe Day weeedimpfted a; and tkiiiinise
t !
mpporrto Ministers; thong!), by, when they 5h0414 haitheozkinefetted. To Ste: er‘. '.5 fth'ilt Vi:4o=Chitieello!'s notO stlbFettego4. .
ie purest and conscientious 13e would answer, that there. wits Vot hitherto Ft eis- of the COX et .-•' . 0 Pr Oenitennicia. ...i.'Crak .. ". • -' : • •
nseemly in him to forget the portOoiq of makinga
it, and that @re was no nett.. reml,ati9r,tber.,,. . • . .rinjuricies'oximat 'emelt. .ww vilderstan. .ct Mat. a reward hat been ptivately
dembet for &amber, whose suy foscgivins•nouce to the Members. of a COmmit- 'The ' r , :.. tlaill. thithairlit" '..." ''•
.-. 'ONO tif OW itioe*ery oirthe Author of thrum
tys been regulated by sound tee wheel a discussion was to take lop. upOs =4.a an. IO,OO ~ '
- . agate Oath siiiki. EliktegaiNfteVialied•" . Editdast or a Migs44-0 Ss
eel feeling,. The Hon. and 'the,,.measures. . kie.'had also .ciltit4 glpined., bustlto• • „
~ AO* •„, , , 3be Honownitk .1410ParifkA0CPcs %VI anecdotes ain. de-
roceeded to comment on the alone was Made responsible for 81/ Al)ftir nets,. asi tO . Aped als . opi he
to the parues actuelly
diespeechof.theßightlion• Nut indiiiditalky werp,directed .wlitet hie termed al .
• . cOnetei 6elizonaliteez .tiOnsaiiiiiarieittii-Jesi)ftitv di. 'fritch• haV c.atised
tharhe had behavedwith no the charges. Tfad he &lonia that on. mire Occe- he thou*. • justified in doing to ; ingfilfeliki much-conitenulti°n lui/eing. certain. ralhicniOnk- '
' .