Star.
London, England, 1821-08-21 00:00:00

-..-

•

• s

•

4.DJOIIRN,ED4INQUEST UPON R. HONEY.
(WIRD DAY.)

-, . •

This Inquest met, pursuant to adjournment, yester-
day, at two o'clock. At twenty minutes after two
Mr. STIRLING, the Coroner, entered the room. The
Jury were called over, and the usual Proclamation
made, when the Coroner stated, that in consequence
of the wish expressed by the Jury, he on Saturday
communicated to Mr. Hobhouse, in the absence of,
Lord Sidmouth, their desire that the troop of Guards
employed on Tuesday should be drawn up, accou-
tred, dressed, and mounted, as on that day; and that
the witnesses should be allowed to see them thus
drawn up. In answer to this request he had received
the following letter from Mr. Hobhouse :
" Sia—Having sent to Lord Bathurst, in the absence of Lord
Sidmouth, the paper you placed in my hands, containing the
request of the Jury now sitting to inquire into the cause of the
death of Richard Honey, that the witnesses should be permit-
ted to view the military employed on Tuesday at Cumberland-
gate, in the dresses and mounted on the horses which they rode
on that day, I have to acquaint you that the troop will be drawn
up in the barrack-yard, Hyde Park, to-morrow morning, at half-
past eleven, mounted and accoutred as they were on that day ;
and that any witness, having a ticket,will be admitted to inspect
the troop ; and, in the presence of two Magistrates, to see every
(Nicer and private, in the same dress as they wore on that day.
" I have the honour to be, Sir, your obedient servant,
a B. HOBHOUSL"
This communication having been read by the Co..
roner, one of the Jury proposed that they should also
be admitted to view the troop at the same time.
The Coroner expressed a doubt whether the Jury
would be admitted: all they had applied for had
been granted.; and, as appeared to him, all that was
necessary had been granted. He saw no use in the
Jury attending to view a regiment of horse. He was
not aware that by so doing the ends of justice would
be at all promoted ; or that the Jury would be better
enabled to discover how the man came by his death
on Tuesday.
A conversation of some length followed, in which
many of the Jury expressed a wish to go to the bar-
racks; some urging the necessity there was that the
Jury should be admitted, and claiming admission as
a right ; others differing in opinion as to the neces-
sity, and especially as to their right as Jurors to go ;
and one Juror suggested that, as their first applica-
tion to the Secretary of State had been so readily
agreed to, a second application should be made to
him to have the indulgence extended to the Jury ;
and he had no doubt but their application would meet
with the same indulgence.
Mr. Sheriff WAITUNIAN submitted that a Jury had
a right to go anywhere if they considered their doing
so necessary to promote the ends of justice. It might
be very important that they should be present on this
occasion to see the manner of the witnesses, and ob-
serve how they recognized any person, whether they
did it immediately or hesitatingly.
The Foreman was anxious to go, considering it es-
sential to their giving a right verdict.
One of the Jury still urged the propriety of making
an application on the subject, and proposed to put
the question to the vote.
Others contended that they had a right to go, and
therefore it would be improper to make any such
application, and proposed, as an amendment, that
the Jury at its rising should adjourn to Knights-
bridge, that they might be in readiness to attend at
the barracks.
A conversation of some length followed, and the
motion for making an application to the Secretary of
State was negatived by 8 to 7.
Mr. Sheriff WAITiIMAN then addressed the Coro-
ner and Jury, and said he was anxious to state the
course which he had to pursue. He had a list of
witnesses in his hand, which had been handed over
to him by the brother of the deceased. This list
contained about 100 names, and he was anxious that
no one should be excluded who could identity the
person who fired the fatal shot, whether they h;.cl
been examined, cr remained to be so. The brother
of the deceased had no vindictive motives, and he
trusted he had none. He would be most reluctant
to occupy unnecessarily the time of the Coroner or
the Jury : he had looked over the list, and believed
that many would only prove the facts already before
the Jury. Out of a list of thirty he believed there
were about six or eight of these who could identify
the Officer, and to those he wished the Coroner to
give tickets to see the troop drawn up. With
respect to the course of examination, he should con-
fine himself to what occurred at Cumberland-gate ;
other Gentlemen might put whatever ques.ions they
thought fit.
Mr. HaNsosr said, if these six or eight were now
examined as to that fact, they might now have tickets
given to them.
Mr.WatTIIMAN said he would proceed to call these
six or eight witnesses; lie would put the list of thirty
in the hands of the Foreman, who would call any he
thought proper.—The first witness called was
Brooke Page—He lives at No. 9, Warwick-street,
Golden-square' a French polisher. On the day of the
Queen's funeral was near Cumberland-gate ; the first
thing he saw was the Procession coming through
Cumberland-ate, and turning towards Oxford-street.
He saw the Guards retreating. The witness was at
Kensington, and saw the resistance of the people at
Kensington-gate ; the people got the gates shut, and
the soldiers attempted to open them ; the people,
however, persisted, and the soldiers then rode at
them, and began to chop at them with their swords.
Witness saw one soldier's sword break short at the
andle. The gates were forced a little open, and
witness, with a few others, got through. Witness
soon after saw a poor man, in a fustian jacket, lying
on the grass, and a Life Guardsman rode at him
and made two cuts with his sword. He then re-
treated three or four yards, and the man recovered
himself a little and drew up his legs. The soldier's
horse started back at the moment his rider made a
cut at the man, and he missed him ; the soldier then
retreated to his comrades at the gate. The witness
then proceeded to detail the transactions which took
place between Kensington and Cumberland-gate:
witness got to Cumberland-gate soon after the
Guards did ; the hearse was just then passing through.
The Guards were there, and also a great procession
of horse just before him, and he saw them clearing
the way in a furious manner. He saw the hearse
enter Edgeware-road and turn towards Oxford-street,
but immediately the soldiers returned, and the hearse
turned towards Edgeware-road, and there was a
great piece of work in a minute, the soldiers cutting
;Lad dashing in such a manner, which caused the

many stones to fly, as near as I can say, opp6site Ski One of the Imes said he was of the tame opinion,
William Manners's, near the corner of Tyburn-gate; but they had.invariably been dragged down to Ken-
here they began to fire ; it was an Officer that I saw sangton against their inclinationss
had no inclination to press
shoot first. I was pushed away with the crowd,
Mr.Sherff WAITTIMAN
sometimes in the road, sometimes on the pavement. this point, but the last witness had eve
saidn been press
eded
I remained with the crowd until they ceased firing, not only as to what Sir Robert Baker , b
and the soldiers moved on, and I moved on by this as to hi s gestures.
This evidence would open the
house (the New Inn), till at a distance I recovered The CORONEIL—
myseIf, and began to examine myself to see if I was door to conversations, and to all other evidence, how-
hurt, and found I had a shot through the crown of ever irrelevant. The question was, did the witness
my hat. I have been in the Navy, but never was in hear the Riot Act read, aye or no.
such a phillaloo in my life. I had also a shot through The witness.—i Certainly I did not.
the skirt of my coat. The stones were not thrown at The Cortimsaa.—That is evidence.
the soldiers till after the cutting, but before the firing. Witness.—Sir Robert Bak
Robert also told me that
as I was engaged in taking care of myself. I did not the Procession should go thro
not eughviden the
ce.City.
see the man shot. The CORONER.—That is
The CORONER.—Then there would be little use in Mr. Alderman Warrasraw.—What ! not the con-
your seeing the troop ? versation of Sir Robert Baker with the witness.—
Several questions were put by the Jurors, bat no Good GOD, Sir, if this is not evidence we had better
new fact was elicited. . • withdraw from the inquiry altogether I
By Mr. Haasorr.—Can you make it convenient to One of the Jury.—This is a link in the chain which
be at the Barracks at eleven o'clock to-morrow ?_ the devil can't break.
Witness.—Certainly ; but I cannot swear to the Offi- Another Juror.—lf this evidence is not admitted,
it is not fair play.
cer ; I can only swear to a soldier who struck a Gen-
tleman on horseback. Mr. Alderman WAITHMAN.—The question here is,
W. I). Jones is a Gentleman, resident at Oxford, whether the Riot Act was read or not. If the Riot
but at present on a visit in town, at No. 9, Richmond-
buildings, Soho-square; joined the Procession at Ken- would not be justified even in flourishing a sword,
sington ; the oe were shouting and making a great for that would be an assault. The question was, did
noise, and crying—" Through the City!" Sir it:. the military act under the orders of the Magistrate
Baker came up and placed himself at the head of the or against those orders ? Sir Robert Baker said, the
Procession, with a soldier by his side ; the soldiers rode Procession should go through the City ; now did the
about Kensington-gate, and drove the people on the military afterwards act against that order, and force
pavement, and the people called out, " What do the the Procession another way ? If so, we were for
soldiers do here?" and, as the witness conceived, ra. a time under military government—that was the
,
I
ther abused the soldiers. Witness saw a soldier point question.
his sword downwards towards the people, but he Mr. Haasoa.—No, that is not the question—the I
would not swear he intended to strike any one. Wit. question is, did the populace so maltreat the soldiers
ness left the Procession here and ran through the that they were obliged, in defence of their own lives,
Park, and arrived first at Hyde Park Corner; here to fire? When he came to call evidence he would
he heard the people-making a great noise, and con-
prove that to be the fact.
tinuing the cr y of, "To the City.' At Cumberland- A long conversation followed on the admissibility
gate witness saw the Park gates closed; the people of Mr. Gregg's evidence; and, at length, the Co-
were crying out, "Butchers!—Piccadilly butchers!" roner decided, that what was public conversation
The soldiers forced the gates; some of them rode into might be received.
Oxford-street ; others remained to keep the gates The witness then proceeded to detail what passed
open. Witness then heard some firing in the Park, under his view at Kensington-gate. He saw a con-
and presently after lie saw stones and mud flying test between the soldiers and the people. They cried
about ;he did not see the flash, or the person who and screamed, " the City ! the City !' Witness rode
fired, and he did not know who fired ; after the firing through the crowd up to an Officer, and asked him
1 the brick-bats flew in all directions. Witness begged under whose orders he acted ? and he said, he was
of those who stood near him not to throw anything; acting under the orders of Sir Robert Baker. Witness
and one of the soldiers said, " Sir, you had better get asked if the Riot Act had been read?
away, or you'll have one at your head—you'll get The CORONER.—His answer is not evidence, and,
hurt." There were several shots fired after this, and therefore, we will not have it.
witness moved towards Cumberland-street, where Witness.—l asked him how he dared to strike the
there did int appear to be so many people. After People if the Riot Act had not been read ? He re-
that he saw an Officer, fourteen or fifteen yards from plied, "If you do not get out of the way I'll cut you
him, or more, towards Tyburn, fire; but witness down r or if I struck him (or words to that effect)
could not say whether any person fell by that shot, lie would cut me down. Witness then called Sir R.
but at the moment there was a cry that a man was Baker, and he made his appearance. Witness said,
shot. Witness could not say that the Officer took
" Sir Robert, do you see what the soldiers are doing
direct aim at him. He should know the Officer again. ?
has the Riot Act been read ?" In a mild tone -he
The impression on his mind was, that he had fre- said, " No, it has not." Witness observed, " Then at
quently seen the individual in his plain cloaths. Wit- you; peril allow a man to be hurt." This was said in
ness saw Sir Robert Baker several times. Sir Robert a loud voice. After a minute or two he called the
seemed mach distressed, and said, in the witness's soldiers away. The funeral then proceeded along the
hearing, "Fur Goo's sake, Gentlemen, eve ou have road, Sir Robert accompanying the Procession, and
any influence exert it." This was said sevral times heading the soldiers. Witness again rode up to him,
to the Gentlemen about him, who witness supposed and addressed him, " Sir Robert Baker!" I believe
belonged to the Committee, as they had crape hat- he replied, " Yes." Witness said, " The minds of the
bands on. The Guards afterwards made a movement people are extremely irritated ; and I fear, if you in-
to go away, and witness got into the New-road. The sist on not going through the City, lives will be lost."
Officer is a young man. Witness did not hear the He replied, " I think so ; and I have made up my
Riot Act read. mind that we will go through the City." Witness
By Mr. HANSON.—Before the Of icer fired, stones asked, a Which route will you have the people to
had been thrown for some time. Witness would not take ?" He answered, " The most usual way, which
have come forward on this occasion, but a Clergy- is the best, St.James's-street and Pall-mall,l believe;
man, a friend of his, to whom he related the or- but if you have any influence, pray exert it to prevent
cumstance, said it was his duty to come forward, any confusion opposite Carlton House." Witness re-
and state all he knew ; and under that impression he plied, if he possessed any, he certainly would. And
had come forward. Sir Robert said, " Yes, yes, I am sure you and every
Aungier P. Cropley, N. 3, Fountain-place, Mi- respectable man with to see order preserved as they
nories, carpenter, was with the Procession, and bore Pass the Palace of the King." Witness asked if Sir
the Carpenters' Banner ; he had got to Cumberland- Robert would authorise him to go and communicate
gate, and was going down Oxford-street, towards to Sheriff Waithman, Lord Hood, and the people,
Park-lane, preceding the Funeral Procession. He that they were to go through the City? and he re-
was standing still and saw the soldiers riding along, plied in the affirmative, and witness made the com-
two of them passed his left; they turned round and munication accordingly. Witness then rode to Hyde'
came back to the right side of him, and one of them Park gate, and announced it, and the Procession pro-
struck him down and his banner fell with him; he ceeded alon Piccadilly, till nearly opposite Park-
got up again as well as lie was able and ran to the lane; and after waiting tea or fifteen minutes, some
pavement, when two friends took him to the Middle- One announced that the hearse was gone through the
sex Hospital. Ile saw no more of the Procession ; Park. Witness was at this time just before Sir Robert
saw no stones thrown, nor any pistols fired, lie was Baker. He rode back and ascertained the fact, and
hurt in the head and arm. He did not hear Sir Ito- then went back to Sir Robert, who was with the
beet Baker read the Riot Act, nor admonish the Commanding Officer of the Guards, and said, " Sir
people. The hearse was not at this time through Robert Baker, knowing you to be the Chief Magis-
Cumberland-gate, though the horses were. Ilis hat trate, I took your word that the Procession should
was cut through, and he was wounded in the head ; go through the City. You authorised me to proclaim
his arm was hurt in the fall.—(The witness had a it, and you have now been persuaded to break your
bandage round his head, and his arm was in a sling). word. On your own head be the consequences—l
By Nlr. HANsons.—l was just before the hearse.— dread the result." He made no reply. After waiting
The horses in the hearse were turned, but witness a few minutes, the people began to reproach him
could not say by whom. Witness would not know (witness) for having deceived them.
the man who cut him. I have only to say, that the CORONER.—What have we to do with that?
best satisfaction I could receive would be, for the Witness.—After a few minutes I returned to Mr.
man who cut me to come forward, and let me have Sheriff Waithman and Mr. Hume, and said—
it out with him. It was a cowardly act. The ConoNER.---Well, are we now to have all that
The CORONER.—WeII, we don't want to hear that. conversation? we may have the conversation of the
Such a temper is calculated to procure you a cut bead. whole of the day. This can have nothing to do with
'By a Juror.—Were you long in the Hospital? No, the present case.—The Jury—No, no, certainly not.
lit was not a place fit for me. I was taken away by By Mr. liaasow.—lt was soon after leaving Ken-
friends who can support me. I should not know the sington that Sir Robert Baker said they should go
soldier who struck me. through the City. I cannot say that he did not re-
Mr. Haasosr.—Are you any relation to the fighter, ceive subsequent orders.
Cropley ? I know no fighter, but I can fight my- The had the.—Sir Robert Bakerrocession never told y
Nouo ;
self, if it be necessary. I can bring forward many that marshalling the P ?
persons to state who I am. but I asked repeatedly under whose orders the mili-
The Foreman objected to this last question, as tary acted ? I knew what I was about. The answer
wholly irrelevant to the case. always was, that they acted under the orders of Sir
Mr. Sheriff Warrant/al.—Supposing the witness Robert Baker, as Chief Magistrate.
to be a boxer, that is no reason why his brains should CORONER.—Certainly. A Magistrate was neces-
be knocked out. sary, and Sir Robert Baker was there : but no one
Mr. HaasoN.--I asked the question, because the ever supposed he had the marshalling or managing
witness talked of thrashing the soldier who struck him. the Procession. That, no doubt, rested with the
Mr. Gregg, upholsterer and cabinetmaker, 32, City- Heralds.
road.—Witness had general communications with By Mr. Warrinstaa.—The change in Sir Robert's
Sir Robert Baker, and had opportunities of observing determination irritated the people, and witness be-
the conduct of the military. He was with the Pro- came afraid of his head. He was hissed, and the
cession from Kensington to Piccadilly, but nowhere people said, " that is he that deceived us." He be-
else. Witness asked Sir Robert Baker if he had read came alarmed, and got away as soon as possible.
the Riot Act? and he said he had not. Mr. WAITHMAN, now adverting to the persons
The CORONER thought this evidence was'irrelevant who had signified that they could identify the Officer
to the present inquiry. who fired the pistol, said, he had a list of sixty wit-

tresses in his hand. He believed about twelve or
fourteen of them could identify the Officer. He now
desired that these persons, though not examined,
should have tickets to admit them to the inspection
to-morrow morning. This course had been adopted
at the other Inquest now sitting. He wished also
now to say, that it was not his intention to call any
witnesses after this evening. He would deliver his
'list to the Foreman ; and if hereafter it should be ne-
cessary, others might be called.
Josiah Dean, 2, Hill.place, Tottenham-court.road,
linen-draper, joined the Procession at Kensington,
and saw two Officers. The witness then proceeded
to detail the occurrences at Kensington, and up to
Piccadilly, and corroborated the statement nt the
last witness, as to Sir Robert Baker's declaration that
the Procession should pass through the City. Wit.
ness proceeded from Piccadilly across the Park, and
passed the Procession. He soon after saw three or
four of the soldiers come riding up the Park, and he
observed three persons knocked down by the horses.
.
One of these persons appeared to be much butt. Wn-
ness overtook the soldiers at Cumberland Gate, and -
they endeavoured to prevent his passing ; they turned
round in Oxford-street, and ultimately they allowed
witness to pass. In Oxford-street he saw an Officer
tiding on the pavement, and cutting at the
Witness went and spoke to him, and told him t!:;-.e
was no occasion for such violence, it was slau3hter-
ing people. He said, " D—n you, Sir, stand out ff
the way, or you shall feel the weight of this," at the
same time shaking his sword, and then he gallopped
quickly towards Cumberland gate. T.e p.0,1e
were at this time attempting to shut the gate; nor
part was shut, and witness believed both. The so',
diers were cutting at the people, and witness believed
it was soon opened. He i.:tw one man cut nn the •
arm, and another on the side of the heal The same •
Officer went up to the gate, and called to the ,01.
diers to charge, and clear the mob. Oae patty went
up Oxford-street, and the others towards E!j?tere.
road. The Officer rode near the pavement. A; this
time the people became indignant. aiad begin tarit
the soldiers with dirt and mu.i. Whether brick
was thrown witness could not tell. The °lce: came
down towards Tyburn Turnpike first, ani then te-
turned towards Oxford-street alone, without the sol-
diers ; and when near Cumberland-gate, he fired to.
wards Cumberland-street, over his lett arm, put up
his pistol, and rode amongst the other soldiers. IV :t.
ness saw the pistol flash in the pan. Witness knew
not that any man had been shot, and the Officer rode
off as if he did not care about it.
At this moment the Coroner interrupted the en. k
mination of tile witness, by stating that he haJ jut
received from Mr. Hobhouse an answer to a letter
which he had written to the Home Department in
the morning, relative to the detet initiation which the
Jury had come to. The answer of Mr. lio4ouse,
as read by the Coroner, was in substance AS toIiOWS:
Sia—l have received your letter, intimating that the Jay
Intend to appear at the Knightsbridge barracks to.nwrrow, u
matter of right, and not of favour. I have laid the sum before
Lord Bathurst, by whom I am directed to acquaint you, that,
as a Jury have no such right, no order will be made on the sob.
jest. I have further to inform you, that, as it would be foot
inconvenient to assemble the regiment at half-pa,t eleven o'clock,
they will be mustered at two o'clock r. )e. to-morrow."
This letter excited an extraordinary sensation among
the greater part of the Jury.
The Foreman—No reason has been assigned for
this refusal.
A Juryman-0 yes ! a reason has been assigned.
It is because you claim the inspection as a right.
Therefore you will not be suffered to go. This is the
short and the long of the matter. It is as plain Eng-
lish as possible.
The Foreman—l think so many objections are
made—so many obstructions are interposed—that
there will be little use in going to the barracks. It
is determined that we shall be opposed in every pot-
sible way,
A Juryman—l believe the understanding was that
we should go to-morrow to the barracks, without any
further observation—without any commuMcafion
being made to Government ; then if we were retuned,
it was not our fault, but the fault of those who op-
posed that which is evidently just.
The Foreman—The Coroner has sent a letter ott•
known to us. He has taken a step beyond the boun-
dary of his duty.
The CORONER—I have done nothing more than!
was bound to do.
A Juryman—lt is all a collusion; I see it plainly.
Another Juryman—And so do I.
The CORONER—I communicated on this occasion,
as I did before, the sentiments of the Jurors to the
proper authority. It was right that I should do so.
The Foreman—This last was a private communi-
cation, of which the Jurors were ignorant. That was
not the case with respect to the other.
A Juryman—Everything is thrown as an irnped
ment in the way of this Jury, as was done with the
Jury at Oldham.
Mr. Spicer (a Juror)—What have we to do with the
business at Manchester? I protest against the intro-
duction of that subject. I think it a disgrace taxi
,Gentleman to name it.
Juryman—And I think it a greater disgrace for
Mr. Spicer to use such language.
The Foreman—We have heard an answer to adv.
fain letter ; now I think it right that a copy of the
letter sent to the Home Department, to which that
answer was returned, should be laid before us. lAt
us know the whole of it.
man—Givelerelmeyleaa vmeatttoesar
ofy right;
g
tht
theAbarracks
isn not ti
will say, in unison with downright honest deahak
This refusal is a decided insult to the Jury.
Mr. Spicer—You asked for one thing as a faro
and how is it inconsistent with reason, when a new_
point arises, you should solicit for that also .as 4
favour? a Jury,
other Pet
we possessed, as matter of right, the
A Juryman—We considered, that being
that of proceeding to the barracks: therefore
that the witnesses only were mentioned. it Os
ooibnugt, t ;
The Foreman—l am astonished to hear people
ought
talking of things as matters of favour,
people
to be looked on as matters of right. We are
nel:su
re the
moned on an Inquest. We are bound to pro ti
we tate
best information we can. Here is a right;
no necessity to seek for favour.
Mr. Spicer—When no right is shewn, you must
apply The CoaosLa—Was it nut solemniy
►
for any privilege as matter of fa.vouar,:ice
4, by

your former pro
♦isit the barracks

The Foreman -
lude, we had a c
sion. The matte
however, willing
this is a point of ;

_ .
The CORONER—
sIot receive it as a

A Juryman-1
say that we wool
your ; we merely
barracks.

A Juryman—S
hot the witnesses
ask the names of I
tan the business E
_ _ . _ ...

Mr. Shetiff 11.-o
word.pn this s!
interfere with the
serve, that the pre
Jury should proce
ment was propos
Made to allow the
spection of the It!
ment was negative
the Jurors to the
Sir, I conten.i tha!
cecd to the Ban
being refused to v
of a very different
seeding. A Jury
that of finding II
or asking, for in
But the present c:
here made is to fu
those ends while
pose a patticula!
mark oa any gai
discovered in the
right to go to the
by their inspectio
decision ? Everyt
so :o decide, that
is an offensive at:
proposition. Ind
that they will att
that they will be
but if you send a
in power what is
as in the present
you claim this ;
you?" Such a c
viting a contest
Mr. Spicer—l
baying received c
own request, we
ought to ask an
against sending
was clearly overr
a right to proc
doubted, and I d
impartial man in
he has no views
far is he justified
Gentlemen think
tial inquirer bets
dead. Standing
had a right to
thing that was do

Tile Foreman.
do so and so ? 1
private kind of n
Jury, and I shall

The CORONER,
The Gentleman a
of State sent an a
thought I had a
sequently occurr
to the Barracks
of favour.
Mr. Sheriff W
subject, I left it
opinion. I wouic
dispute. It is ti
right, when that
of proceeding w
I would not rash
always like to n
than crawl on
might have tree
U That the Jury
the Jury should
plish this objet
putting forth m
the necessity of
This, I should
fensive ' - and b
will be done.

A Juryman.-
who appears for
to introducing
desirous of enter
Mr. HANaos.
pear cannot pro
but they have n
of all the witne:
A Juryman..
Commander of

Mr. HANSOM
over the Barrac

A Juryman.-
of Knightsbrial
Mr. HANSON
ties of State.

A Juryman,
be refuses to m:
that he holds tl
A Juror.-1
summon the A
Let him bring]
will be able to
expense in coi
must answer it
A Juryman.
a former nigh
A trusi of s:ra‘
1 have no dou
be attempted.
The witness
to whom I can
What, in that
you cannot sw
tind hint as yc
A Juryman.
all those ticket

'lt
I
•
• $
11,
4
$ •
41'