Star.
London, England, 1827-04-03 00:00:00

(Mr. R. Grant) to with nother ,
...
..„.....
a..A
then be presented, if tteall=ried, tends
proof of bribery at th ate election. The Petition
then broughmtSpVilk4i
,:c;F iOn the tion iliat it e laid on the table,
~ taigklkk NN said he was of opinion that
tinitifies`weri en 'tied to give evidence of bribery .
past of Mr. Palmer. But here was a decision of a
miuee, decreeing him duly elected, and he saw no
by *bleb it could be reversed. Et was iminateri;
dear the Petition was laid upon the table or..v
should encontrnend that it be withdrawn.
Mr. S. RICE said that if the Petition was received,
they should have similar Petitions every day in ale year.
He should not object to a Petition bearing on the state
of the law.—The Petition was withdrawn.
AIIIIICOLTVILL
mr. BURRELL presented two Petitions from Hundreds in
'Susie:, praying protection for the Agricultural interests.
Sir O. CLERK presented a Petition from Edinburgb,approving
of the proposed Duties on Corn. but praying that these duties be
-rid upon landing the Corn, and that no bonding be allowed.
Mr. WODEHOUSE presented a Petition from Ellesford, In
Norfolk, praying further protection for the Agricultural interests.
was ordered to be printed.
-Eir J. NEWPORT presented a Petition from the Agriculturists
of the County of Westmeath, praying for further protection to ihe
Agricultural interest.
Mr. C. CHAPLAINE presented a Petition from the Owners
and Otespiras of Land at Stamford, in Lincolnshire, praying for
tfortherprotection to the Agricultural interest. .

/111/111111.0 !LADS.
Sir 'ARCHIBALD C hiPBELL presented a Petition from
Ithe Shipowners of the Port of Glasgow, praying for further
,teedon to be afforded to the Shipping Trade.
MMUS SAADI.
Mr. BROWNLOW presented a Petition from the Twiner's and
-othersreniceted with the Leather Trade In the Town of Newry,
praylegfer antra! of the Duty on Leather.
411.1.11 C 00100.
Mr. ESTCOORTp-ostponed his motion regarding the Licensing
of PuMit llooesta ao Mon4y neat.
ooze LAWS.
Mr. DOLES GILBERT resented a Petkien ?ran a Parish
in the County of Sasses, against any alteration in the Corn Laws.
nostano mem
Mr. C. MAXWELL presented a Petition from the Land-
Owners, Commissioners of Supply, and Heritors of the County of
Lanark, against the Bonding System.
LANDND INTIRIAT •
Mr. WESTERN presented a Petition from Witham, in the
'County of Essex, preying that further Protection might be afforded
to the Landed Interest. •

COW
r S KNATCHBULL presented Petitions from certain per.
Abe living in the Western parts of Kent, from Maidstone, from.
llockleigh, from Romney Mani, from Deahant, and from Ash-
• ford, all against any further alteration in the Corn Laws.

IMPRESSMENT OF SEAMEN.
Sir FRANCIS BURDETT said, that in rising to
present a Petition from the Sailors of the port of New-
,castle, against the continuance of the present system of
-Impressment, be felt the subject was of such a nature
that he should not be treating it fairly if he did not say
that it was one which was calculated to call forth all
•our sympathies. The Petitioners complained of the
hardships witch they suffered from being liable to be
pressed, anerthey prayed that some measures might be
adopted to save them from the miseries of such a sys-
tem. They thought, t00014t.. their prayer might be
granted, and that some course might be adopted which
would .greatly benefit them, and wankel not be so bur-
densome to the public. He agreed with the statement
their *Petition, a.ucf he should take die earliest oppor-
'tinily after the kolislays.to bring the Osier.; before the
HMO% 'and to, palm. oot a modes which •be thought
wroslall be at least as effective asthe presentfor manning
4iiilsavy.—Ordered tote on the tale, .

for _
tions in the Corn Trade—for the more repro
of the growth of Corn in England, ind for More effec-
tually increasing the growth of grain in foreign can.'
tries, for the supply of the British Market"—(Hear and
a laugh). He thought that was a full, fair, and emirate
description of the Bill, and for that reason he should
oppose its.forther progress in the House. He was
opinion, that we were making too many sacrifices
the principle of free trade, and that we ought to look
to the conduct of other countries upon that matter, and
Ito observe whether in them we could find any proof of
lit: access. If we did look to them we should find,
that instead of there being any general law in favour
of free trade; the whole matter wall lelt to the exercise
of the Kingly power. The Landed Interest of this
country were a body certainly deserving protection, yet
so far from being protected by this Bill, they were left
Without any protection whatever ; for, by its provisions',
it was impossible that corn could ever rise to a higher
price than from fifty to fifty-five shillings. Yet, in si
lower price than that, it would be impartible Sae
could obtain any protection. Even under .the
1815; the average pries did not exceed sixty sham "••
and no one could expect that the present Bill woe
permit the average to go so high. There was, however
another ground on which this Bill was objectionabier
and that was the injury that would arise to trete •
In the present state of that country, everything ought
to be done that would encourage its national industry,.
and find employment for the people ; and was there, he
would ask, any 01111 thing that the House could do more'
likely to produce such an effect than that of encou-
raging her agriculture? They ought to keep Ireland
in the position in which she was at present, or, at leas •
they ought not tout her in a deteriorated one. Surely,
then, if they found, as he thought they must do, that
their interference would affect the imerests of Ireland,
by lessening her national productiveness, they would
not interfere in the matter. Yet this Bill was calculated
to produce that effect, and he viewed it in no other
light than a temptation for all other parts of the world
to bring their surplus produce here, to Ilse destruction
of our own agriculture. He might, perhaps, be told,
that not more than one or two millions of quarters
would be introduced, and it might be said that that
quantity was but a trifle compared to the gross amount
of what was annually consumed in this country. That
alight be true, but he should contend it was no trifle
ifria. times like these, it displaced the labour of a single
man. He had made a calculation of the quantity of
land that would be thrown out of cultivation by this
measure, and he found that an importation of two mil-
lions of quarters, would throw out of cultivation, at
four quarters per acre, five hundred thousand acres of
land; and consequently would displace the labour of
a proportionate number of persons. This was a
most serious consideration, arid ought to be attended
to. During the discus,ion of this questiOn on a for-
mer night, some Hqnourable Member had stated
that the people of this country were taxed to the
amount of 25,000,0001. per annum for the benefit bf
the landed interest. He had made that calculation
upon a consumption of 50,000,000 of quarters, and had
supposed that ten shillings per quarter were added by
the Corn Bill. Now, evert if tharcalculation was true
as to. the amount; it was not true that all that money
went into the pockets of the landed Gentlemen; some
small portion went to them, but by far the greater part
went into the pockets of the occupiers of land, corn-
dealers, agricultural labourers, and in short all those
persons who co-operated in the production of grain.
Abroad, generdlle, and particularly in France, the
system of trade was one of general exclusion, and he
saw no reason why the Br iiish Government, especially
with respect to corn, should not follow the example. He
maintained', first, that this Bill did what had never be;
fore been done, and puts to hazard the prosperity and
even the existence of the landed interest ; axed next, that
if the object were to keep up the price of wheat at 60s.
r quarter, it was not calculated to effect th st object. It
would, besides, encout age speculation to a most mischie-
vous extent, and surely the country had recently had sue-
dent proof of the en omous evils of bubbles. He was quite
sure that the promoters of the measure had no nation
of the extent to.which it would encourage this danger-
ous spirit. As to the price of corn, recent inquiries
chewed that wheat toeld be brought in from Odessa
at IS.. per quarter, and from the United States at from
Ins. to 15s. per quarter, exclusive of the duty. The
effect of the Bill would be radically to alter the system
of commerce under which this country had long'
flourished, and by which the inhabitants were enabled
to pay taxes for the maintenance of the huge fabric •
the State. He called upon Ministers to reflect on the
unshaken loyalty of the agricutturists, and he warned
them not to cast away those, who in thesour of distress
had proved themselves their best friends. If the Bill
passed this House, it would perhaps meet such effectual
resistance elsewhere, as to ien,,er all the labours of the
House of Commons vain ; and he did not believe that,
at this moment, Ministers were united in opinion upon
the subject: he challenged any Member of the Cabinet
to rise in his place, and declared that there was no di-
vision in that body. Some of them were perhaps not
immaterially alarmed, lest if the measure was made
a law, they would be able to keep up their esta-
blishments. Not very long since their salaries had,
been increased, in consequence of the increased
price of provisions and other expenses: nevertheles
he still thought the Great Officers of State ill paid ;
but his argument was, that ere long they might
not be paid at all. He begged Hon. Members on all
sides, and from all parts of the kingdom, to think for
themselves and to act for themselves—to recollect the
duty they owed to the great body of the people—and
be entreated the especial patrons, of this new scheme of
legislation, to consider that the ruin of the landed in-
terest would be attended with the destruction of many
collateral and dependent interests of the highest value
to the welfare of the country. He hoped they would
passe before they persevered in a Bill for the more ef-
fectual encouragement of speculations in grain—for the
rapid diminution of the growth of grain in Ghat Bri-
tain and Ireland, and for the more speedy promotion
of the growth of grails in foreign countries, for the
supply of the British market. After repeatinghis con-
viction, that if the Bill were passed, ere long one of the
Ministers would be obliged to come down to the House

of the political economists, which were of a very dan-
gerous tendency. Theie was nothing whatever which
those men touched that they did not destroy. Whatever
might be proposed The
them, he was determined con-
stantly to oppbse. The Bill before the House would
have the effect of 'overthrowing the aristocracy, and
through them the liberties of the country, and would
`once more compel us to revert to a paper currency.
Mr. C. GRANT said. that the Hon. Member who

had just addressed the House, carried his apprehension
of the mischiefs likely to result from the Bill, even fur-
ther than the Mo. Baronet himself ; for he had added

to the long catalogue of evils mentioned by the latter,
the destruction of the aristocracy and the liberties of the
country. Notwithstanding all the fetal prognostics it
the Hoc. Members, however, he trusted that the Howe
would not consider it presumptuous in him to oppose.,
their amendment. He agreed with the Hon. ISaronet,
that the question which the measure involved was one
affecting the dearest interests of the country ; and he
joined with him in the appeal which he had made to
the House to decide upon it with reference to its oWn
merits alone, and not under the snaucece of parry or
other considerations. He made this appeal in the full
' sense of the House would an-

confidence good -
iwev it.' In approaching a change of law *nuns
'namely, the trade in corn, there was one circumstance
!which afforded him some gratification—there was no se-1
falsity for combating ancient prejudices which always
hung round the old law of the country. The Act which it
was proposed to change had been in existence only eleven
years, and therefore the House was at liberty to deal,
with it on its own merits, without running the risk of
shocking any old English feelings in its favour. The
Hon. Baronet had asked why it was wished to change
the existing law ? His answer to that question was this
—because the existing law was, in his bumble opinion,
erroneous, and had, morever, failed, grossly failed,
in practice. What were the objects of the existing
law ?—what did it profess to effect ? From the repeals
of Committees of the House, at the period when it wag
framed, from the debates in Parliament, and from ge.
neral impression on the subj-st, he was justified in
saying, that it was proposed to effect three objects, by
the existing law—namely, uniformity of price, pro-
tection to rite farmer, and independence of foreign
supply. Had the law answered for any one of
those purposes ? It was notorious that it had not.
—To chew that it had failed completely to produce
steadiness of price, it was only necessary to refer to a
statement before the Huse. It appeared from this docu-
ment, that in June, 1817, the price of Wheat was 112 s.
whilst in Sept: Of the same year it was only 749. In
April, 1818, the price was 91s. and in August of the
same year it was 78s. The Right Hon. Gentleman,
stated other instances of variation in price quite as'
striking as those above mentioned in every year down
to 1846. He aho stated that the variations •in price
.with respecillb ads and Barley during the same period,
were- not hos venterkable thaw thbse which bad occurred
as to the arti.;:le of Whestk. With' respect to the protec-
tion to be afforded by' ttie farmer, be had the shew.
hag of the.agriculturists themselves as to what had
been the effect of the existing law. Before the
Committee of 1821, they one acid all declared that
the Act of 1815 had produced nothing but distress.
This was the language of the most eminent agricul-
turists before the Committee. Amongst others, Mr.
Webb Hall and Mr. Wakefield said, that the Act of
1815 had produced no good, and that they had not ex-
pected any from it. What hid been the case since
1822? On this point he would again appeal to the
evidence of the agriculturists. From the general state-
ments contained in periodical publications, which were
understood to be under tine influence of the landed in-
terest, it appeared that the depression under which
that body laboured in 1821 had continued to a cer-
tain degree up to the present period. Now, how
did the case stand with respect to independence of
foreign supply, which he remembered was the main
point urged in discussing the Bill of 1815 ? The
amount of foreign wheat imported in 1817 was 2,325,000
quarters, being only 100,000 quarters less than were
imported during 1801 and 1802, which were years of
great scarcity. In the same year, 1817, 700.000 quarters
of barley were imported, although barley was an artie
de very rarely imported; and the amount of oats
ported in 1817 was 930,000 quarters, which was mote
than had been imported at any previous period. Had
we been independent or foreign supply since 1822?
Certainly not. It was necessary for him to remind the
House, that the Legislature had been obliged to inter.
pose to allow of the importation of foreign grain. A de-
claution had been t ut forth by certain delegates of the
agriculturists, in which the question was at ked.B4 Why
di I the agriculturists support a law which it wW
'admitted had afforded them no protection r
answer riven to. this inquiry was, that eircumstanus
bad occurred to obstruct Cap operation of the
law, which were now removed. The circumstances
here pointed at, were the opening of communication
with the Continent on the close of the war, and the
change which had taken place with respect to the ctn.
Irency. The answer which he would make to this dr-
gument of the agriculturists was, that the existing law
was framed in contemplation of those very events. The
framers of that law, in attempting to keep the price
corn in this country higher than it war in forei
countries, had proceeded on the erroneous assumpt.
tbat we could exclude the world from one great bk
of commercial intercourse with impuntty--thit
without injury to our commerce, external and int
The principles of the present question had been
ably developed before the Committee of 1821, that s
very few words further on his (Mr. C. Grant's)
part would be sufficient. The dangers to whi
our agriculture in this country was exposed were two
—a considerable excess of supply, or a considerable
deficiency. Now, did the existing law protect the
Country against these dangers ? It did not. In case
a deficiency, the high mark at which the importati
price was fixed, and the length of time which clap
betweers the periods of *erelong the averages, ex
both the farmers and the public to the hazard of r
speculation and monopoly in the interim ; while, In
the event of an excess, it was necessary that price
,should sialefar lower than under an unrestricted state

that the

it need Wore he was in a state
by importattoo. Do as we might, i
independent of importation. up
we had been an exporting count,
was not an instance in which fire •
without an importation; it was better,
we should adogt sects a coarse as woew
grower ocesaliy to contemplate,'
. . . .

....vs', write oat vseen,;
price necessarily cot,
, to meet the adeanced
lecent ..in oar applying to sources not duly Prepared
(esnish us. Honourable Gentlemen had seemed it
.'s considerable apprefreesimi of the effect that.
' trade in corn would hare upon the exchanges
• country. He denied that, under the law prop°,
danger of that nature was to be apprehended.
OMlTssw now stood, he agreed that inconvenience •
arix. When corn came into the country.
• suddenly and in rest masses, because the
witting it was limited. A short period,
srie
ports probably were again shut. But it
otherwise when the demand was regular and
There was one way, certaioly, in which the currenct
the country would be affected by the regulation r
trade in corn. Any monopoly in that article,
into actual play by a deficiency, must omits,
der an additional quantity of circulating car.
sary to the country. The trade its corn was so ,
that an addition of lOs. or lie. a quarter to
would increase the amount of capital necessary
on the trade more than 1,000,000. But from,
lated importation of corn from abroad no incur:n.ll46
to the exchanges could,be apprehended, and he
prove this by reference to the case of Ireland.
inconrenienee to the exchanges bad arisen '
annual Importations from that country ? O,
effect of the maintaining a high price in corn r
the manufacturer abroad, or to enable the foreigner
undersell him in the home market. We might -
the wages of the labourer, and bring him
diet of corn down to potatoes—it was
hoped that we had not made some advances
that state already; but eves that reseal(
have its termination; sad the result Mast '

_-..reent of manufacture, or a weaver
WIN hardly to be expected) of all profit and •
iiaanufacturing capital. But it could hardly
.
wiry for him to use any further arguments as
pediency of a change in the existing law
'thought that there Could be no comparison,
:Cage, between a scale of dwies, even supposing
'be in some cases prohibitoey, and an absolute
tion. When be was told that corn could not'
upon the terms proposed, he took leave to ...
fact a little. A good deal of the calculation
taken upon arbitrary estimate; and besides,''
isting state of things disproved the assertion.
average price of corn assumed by the new
60s. -How, the fact was, that for the last ei
I
the average price bad been under 575. He
that the agricultural interest had been in
comparative depression during that time
thought that during the. last year or tc
been rallying. In fact, a stronger proof
not be given that agriculture was worth follow
the present time, than that capital was investinr
A great deal of money had lately bees laid oat Is the '-
of under-drainiag; sod the importations of manure w
every year. A few examples of this last fact might
mate value. In the article of boots, our importatiem
Odin in January, 1124, had beers to the amount of, .4
the year MIS, tt was ‘44,00P ; ht. the. seat yea,, it lammed
illn,000; Intim the keine It statemenid to 4.r. In r
article of osaware, wodko'rare one Impaintiple lb ihd
was sna teen In the nestle, woo Set tow le the •
lea. 411 toes • antis the last rear, Ogee /q is the ,
add linseed cake; in the year pogimrJesuiery, ist4,‘
170,500 cwt.. In the nest year, 495,700. In the nen, v.
and in the last year 591,60 G. The Right Hos. Gentleman
corded to segue, that it by oo deans followedtbat the impw
at corn from abroad should materially diminish the sales din
agriculturist; for that the additional spar given to manuf
Would have the elect of 'naiads( the demand. To ear
the case of Ireland; the 400,000. quarters of wheat whi
nuaUy imported from that country, must neeeserily
much corn grown In Great Britain; yet it was net found t
mined any injury, for the stimulus gives to oar mandfretaren
increased oar consumption, sod with it of course our d. -
the quantity which we might be expected to import '
law, some idea of that might be formed (coal the
we had imported. In the ne yens ending is the
total impetration bad bees 11,000.000 of quarters;
three years bad been years of scarcity, which had
million patters out of the moompon. In Barley .
importation bad been very trilling indeed; and in Wheat,
the main ankle of coesideroticas, it might bktly be ,
oar yeasty importations wash' am exesod, upon an .
yew with soother, 000.000 quarters. The Lee .
Gendessen wee ma to thew, by ealcoladoos takes r.
Repast, that there was so jest grated for apprehtuneato
the importation of foreign grain. The defect in tt
of those iloncosrable Gestiessea who were hostile
sere, ley in this. They reneged es if, with the
&passim in the price el grain, the prices of all
dittos, freight, navigation. mad ail other charges,
the sane; they supposed two things which were lean -a
ssersoist whet, and high penes. But an infallible -
prices again would be that of Arming the prices of t
esedition Mr. Jacob had shewn several instances of
a demand is raising prices abroad, and tiny ware such
allay all a of the evils so Much dreaded I
oelltniel • from that frightful pert of the word,
lira, that -deuces of the phantoms which seemed 9
hevrlider the whole. of the landed interest. M.
dense hid = tlgt (actress, by proving Cleat 1
dew will leave Weems Ode*
pilerises no lei= ix Aims be dsitsseed..
ae bass than 445. inthrthigiii, ef . the *Ai, whom!
be. BY ihe lope' sow. km. law Ye*,
epos wheat breters lbsibb munitions uesild a
des. per immembo§ the dump. This Wes sullieleat
thee 11 eleedimilders mined ha oho mild. It eras
druid emortuleed by the agskultedmeseteousakeistaupi,
by the lempenotion of bigots wow All elmolMillially •
mar Poey roWtton osulineedtelpeusesmot
Jacob's report, which na far hit steed withe..lig apil hsil me
ar Midi &abr. He japed that sits
of the Hos. Goodman. (lee of tit,ptalt
Wee k shad
at present was, that it eentrilmated to
et . ;sad es the ether. .He had
would have well ounidered
the law, which* while k failed of that rei
.ler whir it had been enacted, had attained to that west a
elm et sewing division hennas them mud the other la
%bind.... He took leave to my, that the lieseletioes
real Mile House would give those Hen. Gentlemen'
Pity of Rumouring that ardsoodty which was socked
immerses. The country was generally misled Wel t
den; there was very little of popular foals era b.
Enid proceed. the eki objection would be bled to 11
wail sees he as tam bleed et those dletresibig eh
ti_„_ ellehett the Crag% itieerea. • Be entrualeit
all erleettetilty. Ssiir NOR to be awe. *A
giremeesif midi abaft OS* eight some a /Able ill
11011111110111611.111b0 es vise as to the rate sad mollet,
thllithille'rella. There alight ease a time of. er
wWik.lilawillillapat would lied itself conetroksed to
*plating eta lean*: pipidadss. whets the pleas ,
=me wadi beam all powerful. They were eels
. is smileda radio of*ep7taot mature.
,
tillialitee ed the es% )tea stied •
and the pane el el rem. and I
wiplas V they weald psi lad thwart ver Were I
seeeedly el viewing' loos regard only' to the real
questioa—(Ltied and repeated cheers.)
...e i Mr. WESTERN conteadedi tbat but fit
_. _ ___. ____

.~'

. ,
~
Iterititlit _portant infbrination had been received. At all events, in baste to require its.suddeo 'reptal, the Ihowerable of things it
tandeting he was convinced this sweeps we,. t such eit , -• •by moving,. ,
.0.0,,• himself by
-...--ti-4.--A never be i
titian tiros Londed Interest .to adkCe tOy, , ially mites a 4.-.....k..,4. • • this day biz
wire ttoill Leslie* u to lir ate arf most import- ... • 41,1 S year 1770,
ant Questialp, 04 del . ive. )(lento.- e tfiousht this tkit .. elsec dons 'us teill
l:f Ili let there a
t the Pei.. be * truOinvil kir eppostig the BAUM freskiple. I* . •• additional fo . 7 ,enhe - psed witl
ry on the objected to thenill, because he deed& it destructive of the • was gtelieria a then - iil ' ch (ore, that w
of a Com- the Lauded Interest, and if he were asked to describe it, wools/ •atinihilate it. On al -.si es the agriculturists the foreign
no power he should say, that instead of being called a Bill to fir complained 'that the Bill afforded them no adequate ply of ottr r
!rig whe• certain duties on Corn, it ought to be described as I, a part-Omit Tbe Bill of i 822 had been condemned, occurred, u
not. He Bill for the more effectual encouragement of specula. unheard as it *ere, for it had never come into operation. qoent on of
- . - - -.....ffr-...---:_- irk...... ...Am*. 1,6 .1,...k• ......not tit the deLZtriftpt finnish et.

•
to relieve
see should ere
Jp to the tin
retry ; and
years had 4119
tier, there.
'o led allow
dethe sup. nal
It access'
lolly come. 4114
stepared to INN
ed to enter.
1110
that an im.
;changes of vii
Prupose4,
ended. As 041
'eoce might •
ry. it To ~t
the time for 'a
de and the
Would hi IA
I tempera e,
currency of KI
ation of the mon
le, brought
'starchy res.
'Oal nece mkt
o enormous,
to its price •
wiry to tinny
nom a Ng&
rid he might
and. What
rev from our foe
0.. e certain
was to drive
foreigner to essi
bight reduce via
him from a sal
only to be
aces towards
ounce must
t be a total we
ever (which of'
I return upon
lii be netts.
as to the ea.
aw ; and be
1, in odes's. 60.4
ming them to /II
slate prohibi. e_„3111
not be gross W 0
to doubt that des
:elation was P'
rides, the es. NW;
ertioa. Elbe 1
ew law war
t eight years,
He admitted,
its a state d 01
tae ; but be 1
two it had
proof could
following at
✓esting iu it.
he improves/rat
weed iacttaieg
it pother lure 1
time In the ye.:
1, 4,000. la
, k kennel*
' to aawbe
3 ilid yew twit
bestir lan, m
hp article of rape
deore in,purtei
e nen, ii 6.1163; • .
Geathisaa pro.
the imp-Nuke
sales of the keen V
o manufactasers
*o instance again
t which we as.
lay displace w
the
Nod that wens.
ustifactaren hid Pt•
it demand. For slea
tt under ilse mew eah
Turk), which
year 1115, ear lei
; and of teats
emitted ivy
y and tarts
ism
lira, which was
e calculated that t
average et me cs
Ow Homan*
taken fres the .PO,
ebeatioas, at ta
s tee at:lml°
tile to the lOW _
! most Omer
.47
II other comore
b world mein vial
iseampatiblo—s
le melt el Ms
at all ethers:ow
s of the Am tf
web as sosigto
lesl by the re*
76Hettimillial:st.cors711Jiatelageobrtsditteib:eipoorii:e•at:Ibissiwors:
Bekat to pores
is *ewe • chi
limpereiti4ol,
Slay 111*-
sessresx of Mr.
led use been so.
read °ppm de
great evih of tho
11 to excite mi. ft
hod !Med chit el
mid this • rho sis
lot I'm Purse el
own soweitave
cher losersas
hit3ool DOW
ores is opportio
ad splint tie
• she mats test.
it. It the IS
r deep, tad teem
mad angry con'
tea them set to
thee he does ti
la wilds there
mow of Wel!.
sztrookl9 •
to mead gip *
kess of hessaerf
rs aloe bated • ,
mare, the pot-
. 4 the satires]
Its was go**
hog war ill
a *sue a the
N the nage
' •
t
i .‘,.
41:47