Star.
London, England, 1827-12-14 00:00:00

BRUSSELS PAPERS.

•• HAGUE, DIC 6 AND 7.
The Second Chamber of the States General bad
belote it she discussion of two projects of law, the one
fixing the- repartition of the total of the land tax among
the provinces of the kingdom, the other creating a fund
fi.r the relief of the provinces which are rated too high.
Th hawing been adopted by a majority 0f.69 votes
to LS, the Chamber proceeded to deliberate on the
sec-ad, and the debate being extended to a great length
could not be concluded on the 6th. On the 7th several
inetn4ets having spoken for and against, the Ministir
111 Poirot* rose to defend the project. after which the
question »as put, when there appeared to be 45 in
tavotti. and 46 against, so that it was lost by a majority
of one +cite. Thr President then said, .4 The Second
Chalnber of the States General sill express to the King
its gratittitie for the seal with which he attends to the
merest of the kingdom, and will respectfully request
cake the proposal in:o further consideration."

BRUSSELS, D. to.
Two Russian couriers passed through Berlin on the
3d, on their way from St. Petersburgh to Paris.
' A British Cabinet Messenger passed through this
city yesterday from London, with disPltches for Vienna,'
•nd this morning an Austii.in Cabinet Messenger ar-1
rived from Vienna, .with dispatches (or Landon.
DIIMIDIII 11.—The Hague Journal of the 10th
says, " The ,hip' Potomac has brought accounts from
Jaya to the 22J of August, which announce that the,
rebel Chief Dip° plegoro has entered into negociations,l
that hostilities haddalready been provisionally suspended,l
and that great hopes were entertained, that this war
would be soo• terminated. The negotiations were
commenced by- M. Stayers, a planter settled in the
country of the Princes, and the Commissioner General
intended to go thither himself, in order to accelerate the
11
conclusion' of a faiouiable convention.

CORFU. Nov.
Ibrahim Pashi is on the march to Patrpcwith all bis
forces, leavirt only weak garrisons in the casder of
MoJon, Corers, and Naiayin. It is thought be will join
ftedschid l'acha in Lividia!: A French ship of the litte
and a frigate have sailedlor Alexandria:. The French
f,rie, the Zebra and the 'Limn* corvette, are gone to
C.nstarrino.ple, to be placed
I'at Fhe disposal of Count
• I •

•
NQv. 13..—Joseph Payaghiii, captai
n of the Occulto,
and 'Austrian merchantman, being pursued by a pirate
io V e Golf of •Cothi,'took refugit.bei.e yesterday. Sot n
after his arriiatj,,eonliard Davatizo, also an officer of a e
A tisttiish -nserchananan, Wtrieed in, to boat froin,the port
near Butrinto, and ereseated to the A ustrianConsul-
Gene, al a petition,friiin five Auitrian vessels at anchoi
at Butrin'o, asknig succour against• the pirates, who
watched them at the enuance of 'the channel to the
north of Corfu, and bad even penetrated, in the night
of the 11th, into the port of : autrintn, but afterwards
retired.

M. Haueischeld, the Auitrisin Consul• General, im-
mediately ordered the Captain °titre Austrian schooner
the Sophia, at anchor in our port, to take the necessaty
measure. to protect the Au.trianmerchantmen. He was
on the point or gang in person to Wait on Gen. Adam,
to request him to put
.fin end to piracy on the coast of
i Corfu, when he w..s nformed 11.1t.kwo lonian vessels,
the Lord Castlereagh, a 'Go' vernsueur schoOneroind the
Su FleJelick Adam, lonian'stearkstboet, hiving hastily
taken on board)r.ittty English stililiirre, had sailed at noon
in quest of die Orates. The steaps-koat took the Lord
Castlereagh in tow. and posh proceeded to the south
parrot the Island,Whither the pirate that had chaiedCapt.
Gavagnin. harl. steered. Acinupanied by enother vessel.
In Lie eveniot the steatu4oat returned with the two
vessels, whio had been Aptured ; they are two schoo-
ners; the ong..sigater orate called the Calliope, is fur-
,
Gashed. with • patent .from 'Lord Cochrane, and the
o~er is said' to be an InaianMet cbintman.
4101 we belie Jearut here Prim another suspicious vesiel
sitl4.,ereizing at the entrance of the channel to the
port)) ot coat)) the Conseil-General has taken the com-
mand .of the Sophia, t 9 escort the Aurorit Austrian
packet, which' has coro, from Trieste, with a sprn of
50.000 (dries ilia turmex ; and he will jilt() take undef
his protection Mr tire' Austrian merchantmen that are
here and at Buttinto, bound to ports in the Adriatic.

be taken agidnat7trim..triltpeitioi. his alleged. Itanacy;
and it therefore priyed dust thedistriisgst might-be dis.
charged, and that Me. White should be ordered to
countermand his .notici given to -the tenants.: The
Coonsel argued that. the :proceedings of the opposite
patty deserved the censure of the Court, and that the
prayer of the petitioi ought tnie•grinted. •
Mr. Wright was orr the raise side, and in'ttippot of
the application Mentioned Remelts tbe maitermf Baker,
in which when he (Mr: W.) was attorney, a similar
thing had been done. 'The LOrd'Uhancellor, upon that
occasion, insisted that such a sum ICI he thought was
necessary for the defence should be paid innihis (Mr.
Wright's) hands. It was quite necessary itr this case
that the petitioner should be allowed to receive. blares=
and dividends, because he had witnesses to 'Wag Twat
Bath, and he could not get their 'evidence wlthrint pay-
ing at least their posting expenses.
Mr. SUDDEN mid-his answer to this ease was a very
short one, and he believed it was quite is'satisfactory
as ft was concise. The proieedings which had, been
adopted were quite necessary for the pieserivitirrn of
Yr.'Holtnes's property, a.,d were not only justifiable
wader the practice of the Court, but proper in every
point of view. In the brat place, the petition was ob-
jectionable, because it asked the Lord Chancellor
,to do
that which he had no right to do; and which never was
done. It required him to discharge a distrifgas which
had beetaissued out of another Court Of Equity. '
The LORD CHANCRLLOLL said the diaringos was a
proceeding in the Eicheqw preliMinary tikahsli being
filed. He doubted vary, much whethsefm,4ad the
power, and, under the eiriiimatances of .tlaia .case, he
doubted still nvire,tbkeipediency of takingocha step.
• Mr. Hoax' said the dietriagne was fssedsl at; the in-
stance of Mrs. Stephenson. Now his Losdibip *fluid
recollect that Mrs. Stephenson was the daughternt-Mr.
.Holmes, awd that, so far from having any clainsaaainst
him, she was living with.her husband, who w .s out -of
trade on the bounty of her father, aho made her an
allowance of 2001. a year. It was preposterous, there-
fore, to say that she had any claim against him which
entitled her to go into the Court of Exchequer as a
plaintiff against het lather.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said, the disirives was a
proceeding preliminary to filing a bill. It wat impos-
sible to say, in this stage of the business, what tam was
to be brought forward in support of it; and it-matt too
much to discharge it nail some reason for 'doing to
was shewn. . .

Mr. SUGDEN Conti°Midrib meant, he istid, to put
the case upon a higher ground. • A commission of lu-
nacy had been issued against Mr. Holmes; the Jury
upon that inquest found that he was unfit tp'have the
management of his affairs. Their finding,it". was true,
was afterwarcit quashed; 'tut 'for what season?—
Not because the evidence did..nnt, warranftfiem so to
find, but because the manner of their Wing 4:4 not
consistent with the technical •forfre o*e-ding
cases had prescribed for such inquisitiestv.
then, although Mr. Holmes- was • not • a (feta* in
such a sense as would jtritify the Coeft
from him the conduct of• •his own piOpelly, and
committing it to tl.e care olanothef, was he not in
such a situation as called upon trek Court to'rest its
protection about him, so as to prevent a spoliation of
his property, or that it should be so dissipated in the
course of the litigation Which was thus pertinkcioissly
kept up, that when the matter came to a conchftion
there should be no means of subsistencelefi: tn. him?
He did not overstate the case. 'Thete•wdra ton good
grounds for the asset t:onthe made, that the prOperty of
Mr. Holmes was in danger. When Abe Court beard,
that on the 30th of October, the very day on which the
Jury found that he was unfit to manage his concerns, a
sum of 1 pow. Bank 4 per Cent. Stcck was sold out of
the Bank in his name, and that on the 18th,of Septem-
ber preceding,'another sups of 8001. hid been- also sold
out, and the money spent, wit it not tittle that a stop
should be put to the possibility of such psOceedings in
future?

Mr. WRIGHT said the money had been expended in
the defence against the commission Of litruicy which had
been fatted:
,The LORD eIIANCIRLLOR said, it was a great misfor.
tune that the parties could not see the injudiciousness
of their proceedings.. They were wasting in litigation
a property already very small, and that undeiAircati-
stsnces which made it very.painfid for eleittroe who
hid to decide upon their conduct.
Mr. SUDDEN said, that the course.orbieCiaftlarties
had take,p was verriisuch to he regretted. "
The LORD CNA ReELLon said nobody fOlt that regret
mere sensibly than Ihimself.,
Mr.'§oopast continued to argue that he Aril' made
out such' a
case as 'justified the steps which his client
had taken, and that thergfore die wavltion ought to
be dismissed.
a—nr.
This Loan Cnewon.Lott w as Wt ~OUDt
Qf MT. Holmetipropeoy.
' said the ARk-,
ildeßds; amoiniterl"mbal
per inutiau.' '• •
Tis.l4llllCil►lorgoi say. i.,
that he o ughtiat to be deiriied
fending himself against the -

.:ortifit: glae, and
. ..
*weft AistI,WIL
diiiii4Ciflaigir
need of the meats' er a-
t proceedings which were

V

~.

4).?

H 41114111 •110 ‘lllllll4ll.

- - a
larolloo'
orkstist - hatieithervoat less beiessary that kb
*boa Ise taken car*
ow wri4 bkwas wt tng to give.op the real,
aad the ievasSilhomprovided no past of the peepertineriael
the miter ' was touched.
•!l/ Buttes Id cake arty suggestion from 1
Celan, iiir-wureld accept no concession from the other
side. He then replied, and after a short conversation
betweea the Court and Counsel, it was understood that
Mr. White should countermand the notice he bads'
to the tenants, and that the dividends of the std
meal
might be received.
IN RC TRILLIMION.
Mr. SUMER applied, that a petition of Mr. Charles
Thellhasoo, whose eon will be entitled to the immense
wealth which has accumulated under the will of Peter
Thellussonothonid come on to be heard shortly. It
- prayed that Mr. C. Thellussoa, who was not very rich,.
_ end who hid every large family, might have the en.
joyineat of a bowie *thick was at present held by the
-trustees under the wil;
The motion was granted, aad thsrpetition ordered to
be advanced.

•
comer v. GRANT.
Mr. Roasts moved for the discharge of a writ of tee
easel repo, wigs!' had been granted inslsis cause, and
on the grounds afforded by the amendaseet of the ori-
ginal bill. He bad not proceeded (Oh his argument
at twelve o'clock, when *
The Lbas Cuancactoa sees for the purpose of at-
tending the Privy Coesseik at which the Recorder's re-
port was tube made. •
• VICRCRARCRLLOWS -COURT. sThentsas is.
• e4araglawts v. MALOWVAPI..-MANOINIR e. MALOVIIIN

Protaisistr.
The Vice Cunnost.,l4a4.-It suggestion
this cme stood over, tikat there migtees a verification
of the letters reteived at a prior time Mr. Jackson
in order that I might * satisfied the signatures to the'
powers of attorney and the letters were the same. Now,
I.have read over the affidavits, and my mind. it,cons-k`
pletely satisfied as to the identity of the bandiviitiog;
and,l have not the slightest doubt in the world that the
letter of the 13th of January is a letter written by Wit-
Liam Collins Burke Jackson, although it bears'Only the
name " Burke Jackson; and as far as I hive heard
and seen, there is not the slightest doubt but tint that
letter was written by Was. Collins Burke Jackson. It
appears to me, though I do think Mr. Hoskins has
formed rather too hastily an opinion of the matter, Mr.
Sutclife could not act otherwise, and that no blame
whatever.can be attributed to him,, he only baring dis-
charged his duty to the Court. In point of troth and
justice, Mr. Eagar has in person represented Mr. Jack-
son; and, properly representing Mr. Jackson, under the
authority of that power of attorney, be is entitled to the
order be asks for.
Mr. SOGDILII having made some observations respect-
ing the stitensents contained in a letter written by Mr.
Hoskins, jun. addressed to the editor of a newspaper,
relative to this case, . .

The Vice Coauctr.Loa observed, that he regretted
Mr. Hoskins should have felt himself so much moved
upon the subject, as to think it necessary to allude to
past events, which it would have been better never to
have mentioned.
Mr. EISALD observed, be confessed it did not appear
to him that Mr. Hoskins had a right to complain at all,
as he was a mere witness in the cause. He (Mr. Heald)
thought it fit to state this, as he was Counsel in it ; but
he thought Mr. Eagar's Counsel need not have lavished
so much praise upon him ; when
The Vice CUASCILLOR added—My opinion is, Mr.
Eagar's character bas not in the slightest degree suffered
by what has take* place; but, on the contrary, it has
raised it higher. •

Tbis case was again brought Weis the Court. It ap-
peared that, under as order of the Court, the Master
bad appointed a new trustee, and had placed acertificate
to that effect on the ale. _ _

Mr. HIALD (with whom was Mr. Horace TWISS
and Mr. Lowsinas) now moved that this certificate
might be removed from the file. The Learned Counsel
unneeded that the Master had no right to appoint a
new trustee. The whole power of the Master extended
no farther than to making a repoit that he approved of
some person to be trustee, and it was the business of the
Coon, and not of the Master, to appoint that person.
Mr. Strong& on the other side, contended that the
conduct ot the Master was in conformity with the prac-
tice of the Court, and stated several instances in which
the same thinghad been done.
Mr. Ham.o, in reply, denied that such was the vac.
ticeof the Conn. It appeared from what had fallen
(rola his Learned Fe iend, that a similar proceeding had
obtained in one or two instances. What incalculable
mischief might have bees effected by such conduct, it
was wet fattiest to P; but he was very glad that no
Master had eves asatilled to appoint a trustee to an
ty and he hoped that no Master ever would.
property
ot a trustee was nor like the appoint-
s:ie. nt of a receiver, who was under the immediate con-
trout of the Court. It was of the utmost importance to a
man whn the trustee for his property was, and the
appointment of a person to such an office was and ought
ever to be the business of the Court.
The Viet Csarecozoa said, that this question turned
wholly on a point of practice, and that he should give
no opinion upon the matter until be had inquired what
the practice of the Coen really was.

COURT OF KING'S BUNCH, Doc is.
Steins altar hlieitaaloas Terra at Wats'baser, Wore Lard
Tairsaasam aa4 Special Judea
01111 ?RACAL

Mr. Guawac (with whom was Mr. Cummins) stated
th- plaintiff's case. He it a music seller, in Princes-
street, Hanover-square, and the defendant an iron
founder, in Regent-street, having premises which im;
mediately adjoin those of the plaintiff. There was a
gateway too, through which the carts cd the Otte:Want
passed, loaded with trot. This gateway was so cir-
cumstanced that the carts could.pot be genie int* it
otherwise than by backing the harslet this was clot only
tediou', but Occasioned excessive nesse, and, in some
instances, it had happened that' o loch as half as hour
was consumed in backing in a can g the workshop; also
belonging to the defendant were productive of noise to
an esteot which it was expected *mild fully warrant
the present action-40 an mums Which tendered Mr.
Coe s house almost wtinhabi The defesdaat also
had a forge, from the chancier 41 which a quantity of
smoke issued. that proved a serious; annoyance to every
person in the neighbourhood. this chimney, too, sent
forth what are called " Umbria number sad sine far
exceeding what issues from an ordinary chimney.
Several witnesses, most of whom happened to be
tailors, were examined to support this statement. and
in the answers which they gave in chief fully susuinedi
it. Some of them, on cross-examination. admitted that
before the formation of Regent-street, the forges in that
neighboanond were inure numerous than they were at
present. One witness acknowledged that his lodgers
had lived with him for several years, notwithstanding

die ails wed that, during the summer
add% poillitikilbe prigbbotuhood were obliged
to keep viadirmill sir all day, All the witnesses
salisimilivitil,tbezdttoist cited to begin at an
I:beide the be continued till late at
de4
ft was fwd., that the defendant had
a sum of kteletavins his premises from
Jones, to which his walk were liable from the passage
of the cacti.
The Arroaurt-Gansant. (with whom were Mr.
BROUGHAM and Mr. DIISMAN), in stating the defend-
ant's case, called the atten;ioa of the Jury to the cir-
cumstance of the plaintiff's having put upon the record
several causes of action; this, he bad no doubt, they
would perceive proceeded from an apprehension that he
' might pot-succeed in proving the greater part of what he
alleged, and that, by putting forward separate ground.
of complaint, it he failed in one, he might by accident
succeed in another. When the evidence, which he we.
instructed the plaintiff could produce, should have been
laid before them, they would sea hat Mr. Cox was
much easier pleased in the conduct of his neighbours
some years ago than he had of late become. They
would see that, previous to the opening of Regent-
street, there had been in that immediate neighbourhood
four manbfactories of _this description more than there

existed at present. One of the grounds of complaint
relied on was, that the noise made by the works of de
fendant were intolerable to his neighbours. Now it
would appear in evidence that the greater part of the
buildings of his client consisted of a foundry, not for
works of the larger description, but rather for the exe-
cution of the,lesser classes of iron work; but even
though it were otherwise, it still waa a foundry in which
the operation was melting, sot.-hammering iron,, and
the fuo was not productive .of smoke. The fact was,
be believed, that Mr. Cox VI AS much more afraid of fire
(than inconvenienced in the manner described. After
sebeaitting these considerations to the Jury, be pro-
allied to sag, that if he succeeded in proving,' m be
*ipectert- to do, certain circutrostAnces connected with

Cnz's premises, and the conduct of his landlord in
reference to them, it would be unnecessary for the Jury
;40-.tronble themselves with the facts previously ad-
verted to.

Evidence was thew given to sliew that the landlord
of Cox had Tel the premises in question to him. subject
to the inconvenience proceeding from the g.teway, he
barring received a sum of 3101. As compensation foe the
injury there arising from the proximity of the defend-
ant's manufactory ; and several witnesses were examined
to chew that the situation of Ors, premises was better,
and not worse, than at the time Cox took them.

Mr. GUEMIY, for the plaintiff, replied, contending
that it signified nothing, as regarded the qnerstion of
smoke orblacks, what Mr. Cox's landlord hid done on
the subject of the gateway ; besides which, that the
landlord received the sum in question, not for the gate-
way alone, but for several other matters. The Learned
Gentleman made several observations upon the enor-
mity of the nuisance, and the forbearance and abstinence
manifested by his clients in refraining so long from
bringing the present action.
Lord Tawraange, in summing up, told the Jury, that
the compensation received by the tlaibtiff's landlord
was no bar to the action; and that Mr. Cox's having
bad neighbours formerly 'was' no reason why he
should submit to worse in an time coming. The Wier
don of damages he left entirely to them.
The Jury retired at three o'clock, and his Lordship,
lit was understnod, went 14 attend the Privy Council, it
being agreed that the officer of the Court should receive,
the verdict.
In about half an hour the Jarynnine into Court with
verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, 40s.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. Oursonass,ow. so.
PAX WIT V. 1111113He'
This was an action to recover the meat of alpoV
lor's bill. ,av
.1

Mr. Sergeant WILDS stated ihe plaintiff's case. From
the testimony of witnesses it Appeared that Ase debt had
been incurred three years ago, and remained unsettled
since, in consequence of disputes betaresn the parties on
the prices of the articles, and particularly of a great coat,
for which the defendant objected to pay, as it WAS WO
small for him.

Mr. Sergeant &ANSI; for the defendant, expressed
his admiration of the political maxim-0, Measures
not men." The plaintiff's measures, though large in
amount of price, were limited enough in extent of cloth.
The great coat which he had made for the defendant,
was deficient in its main character'nf greatness; it was
not, in fact, a great coat, or, if it was, it was a serail
great coat, quite too small for the plaintiff's size; in-
deed, to go further, though a lima, it was so extremely
tight on the plaintiff's person, that it might be called a
strait traisicoafg when he had it on, it fastened down
his hands so that he looked like a walking pillar ; he
was ineriossed in his own clothes; it was a sort of
cloth pillory, which. though very fashionable, was still
'more uncomfortable, and such as no man of reasonable
respiration could be expected to tolerate from any
-tradesman. Other items in the bill were overcharged
—these he should reduce. The difference which he
allowed to be due had been tendered to the plaintiff.
On these facts, bis client, the defendant, would be
entitled to their verdict.

Witnesses having been heard for the defence'
Mr. Sergeant WILDA in reply, observed, that the
great coat made by bis client fitted the defendant three
years ago, but it would be too much to expect that it
should fit him yesterday, for the defendant's person
might have been limited within moderate fair pebp6r.
tions so far back as three years ago. Who knows but
be may have served as overseer or churchwarden since,
or have undergone promotion to some city office—such
as Common Councilman—and hive swelled into that
thickness of waist, and rotundity of middle, which by
common consent are attributable to parochial offices
and corporate honours, and whidh, of course, must have
rendered his person unfit fora suit made three years
ago; for any auk in short, but a suit at law ?—Verdict
cfor the plaintiff.

ADMIRALTY-COURT, Da. 13.
THE 05111111.

This was an appeal from the award of the Magistrates
in a ease of salvage of the Osiris, of Ostend,with a cargo
of sugar and count:, which struc'k
on the rocks of Scilly,
icalied the Seven Stones. in the month of February last.
The case contained no feature of public importance.
The Corrar affirmed the award.

to the repoetop three grounds—natuely, Snit, that inte-
rest upon Ihtefeit was not allowable; secondly. that in.
tetest upon costs was as little sot and thirdly, that by
the 3Sd Geo. 111, c. 159, the liability of patties in these
cases was limited to the value of the ship.
Dr.- ARNOLD and Dr. LUSHINOTON, OR the other
hand, contended that where an account, as in the
present ease, was settled, and the party refused to pay,
the interest allowed and the costs decreed became part
of principal, and that the courts of equitysanctioned
the allowance of interest thereupon. With respect to
the statute of the SSd Geo. 111. which limited the ex-
tent of remedy in these cases given by the common law,
it was obviously the intent of that statute merely to
restrict the sum originally given ; otherwise it would
happen, as was actually the case attempted at present,
that the party damnified would be saddled with the
costs and burden of an unjust subsequent litigation of
the question.
Lord SrowExt. said he had very little doubt that be
should confirm the report; but he would hand a note of
' his sentence to the Registrar.
The sittings of this Court for the term closed this
day. and v ith them, it is understood, has cloyed the
public judicial, life nf the Noble aad Learned Lord who
has so long presided in these Courts, with a reputation
which his successors will be fortunate if they succeed
in equalling.

NEW LITERARY GAZETTE AND WEEKLY
REV IEIV.--Under the direction of Mr. Baczparasume, Au-
thor of " Travels in Palestine. Syria, aid Mesopotamia," end Pro-
prietor and Editor of " THe Srovrix" Pferrespeper, supported' by
a LITERARY ASSOCIATION, Melodies soma of die first
Writers of the day, will appear on .W sate 24 of Js-
' meaty, 18118,. a New Weekly Journal, it:lihre:THE LITHE-'
N/SUM." It will be devoted exclusively to Literature, Science,
and Art, In all their rations departments;•and will Need islielainia,l
to Public approbation on the perfect Independence, of ke
ciples, and the strict Impartiality of its Critical Decisions. It will
r also pumas the retaliate attractions of being coodderably larger In
size, more original in its arrangement, and Waft voiiid in its sub-
jects, tbanany Literary Publication now issned•tran the- Press;
while it will not exceed tbe-aniallett or cheapest°, Oars/ in Prim.
being Rightpence per Number unstsmped, and One, Sifting gss
such stamped copies as are required to be sent Free by Post. It
will be published early every WEDNESDAY MORNING, a
day on which no other Literary Journal appears, and may be bad
of all Newsmen and Elooksellen, to whom, or to the Publisher,
early Orders are requested to be sent to prevent disappointment.
" THE SPHYNX," which is published every Saturday Even-
ing, will continue, as usual, to be devoted &hay to the Politics
and Miscellaneous Intelligence of a Weekly Newspaper:- and
" THE ORIENTAL HERALD," wbkh le rehashed Monthly,
to furnishing the latest and most accurate lmgweaeal. der ;be MIAs
of India generally, and especially as to the even seegeeta of a
more extended Commerce with the various Opeelelee Mae Ram.

Moe of Publication, 14?, Smola. fsir.,

TO CORRESPONDIIITIL "
," An A4Wv of war 194epsedetti Jasiaar is regimmiiiiiiPajor
u with s copy of the ankle to w►lth lip alb a*

THE EVENING STAR.