Star.
London, England, 1820-08-23 00:00:00

""FIPTNITMIIII29II"F•^..,-v
'...r----
----7P-rwwwirrTflggw'.'''..vr`Tr'77 —7 -`-- "r"-77‘...171N.7777,Wwwir'''ffsrmrifir_ _ •
....._,,.....
__, _ _
~. _ . : _ _
~
.. •
[ .
. ,
. . .
.' . . .
2
• •
. .
. .
. .
.411 Z . .rer Cent. •' • ".‘
_
- -• AA •
.1.•,--•••-;:,-.-t.r.- -4.40,,
...if ,v,tie....., .
al ...‘ , . • ''.# .N 5
"V:147..., ... ~ ...
..4 . I
• 4""
,2211114.. ~
Ile
-.4
, .... I. _
A.\ r
. .
. •
?. ,•
..,4...:„..,..,
,•..tor.r..._ .... i ..,
esitristrilirr.)!l: "400 p. • 1
I

RE it 10,451

i, .

And if your father were to ask you to go t•, si• ai :,, roma
Black, would you go also?
The SOLICITCA.GENIMA L. —4 submit that that .: proper
question: what the witness wculd do under parrcia ircum-
stances cannot be asked him. Ilypo'hetical qu..stio .re not
regular.

Uid you ever go before by your father's desire to speak to
Colonel Brown or to anybody else ?—Nrvrr before my father
spoke to me, I never went to ally plicc.
I lad you ever seen Colonel Brown befell,: you went to speak
to him at Milan ?—Xever.

How did you support yourself on the journey from Vienna to
Milan, when you went to speak to Colonel Brown ?—My father
paid my journey.
Ilas he made a private fortune by the lucrative trade of a car-
ter or carrier?—He has not.

If ;s your father any money at all hut what he makes froth
day to day by his trade?—No.
Did you live pretty comfortably on the road Prim Vienna to
Milan to speak with Colons' Brown?—We wanted nothing.
You did not go in your father's cart, I surpose; in what sort
of carriage did you go?—ln a species of calash.
When you got to Milan, did your father introduce you to this
Colonel, to whom you had come to speak?—Yea.
Did you complan to Colonel Brown cf the loss you sustained
in giving up a 'good place or a good master?—Questo non mi
ricordo.

Had you made any bargain with the Marquis Onischalti to
take you back after you came to speak to Colonel Brown ?
Nun mi ricordo.
Have you any doubt, upon your oath, that you bad ri.lde no
such bargain with the Marquis Onischalti /—tion mi ricordo.
Have you ever been in his-service again since the conversa-
Con with Colsnel Brown?—Yes.

When slid you go back to the Onischalti was not
in his service again ; but he was going to Hungary, and he ciled
to know if I would go with, him.
Did you go with him as *e pantie de chasse, or did you go with
him for pleasure/—I was asked by the 3larquis if I w,,iild
.go
with him into Hungary as his cook, fur three months.
Did you go with him, and receive wages as a cook for three
months?—He made me a fresent : I had no wages. •
Haw 1%.::;); did r_pc. remain in iloitgary 7—Three months, or
three months and a half.

Was Onischalti a friend to the English Ambassadcr at Vienna?
—I do not know.

Did you ever see him at his house ?—I do not know.

11(Av long is it since you came back from that trip to Hun-
gary with the Nl.trquis Onischalti ?—Last year, after the month
of August or September.
Having no wages, how did you support yourself from the time
you left Vienna to the time you came back and went to Han..
gary with Onischalti?—The Ambassador gave me something
to live on..

D:d the Ambauader give you anything when you went to
Milan ?—.:;Zrn nu ricorvio !

Who paid the expenses ? My father.
Did you go post, or how?—Post.
Both going and coming back ?—No.
I14:w did you return from Milan to Vienna 7—By a
convefaLce._

Who paid ?—I and my father.
Who gave you the money to pay ?—Colonel Brown.
Did your father go hark with you 7—Yes.
Is your father in this coutstry?—He is.
And your wife?—Yes.
And your small Lindy of children?—No.
In what square or street do you live in London?—l cannot
tell the name.

How did you come down here to-day ?—Did you walk or
come in a carriage ?-o;i_foot.

About bow Cr was it? Your shoes are quite clean: hew
many streets did you pass through?—[ cannot tell the di,tatce.
How many minutes did it take you to walk from yuur resi-
dence, your house, or hotel, to this place ?—Ten minutes.
Who came with you ?—I do not know : It was a gentleman
who came to call me.

Does your father and wife live in the same hotel with you?
—Yes.

And 's isobody else living in the same hotel?—Yes.
About how many others ?—I do not know.
Will yoU swear there-are not 70 ?—Quesso non lid ricordo.
Arc they all Italians ?—I do rot know: I never asked.
Are there any other- Italians there besides yourself, you ve-
nerable parent, and your amiable wife t
[The House 'hewing some symptoms of disapprobation at this
question, Mr. BROUGHAM repeated it, leaving out the epithets.]
Answer.—l believe so.
Have you any-doubt of there being any other Italians besides
yourself there?—There are other Italian..

Are there many waiters.in this Inn do not know the
number.

Do you know the sign or name of the Hotel?—ldo not know.'
The tiouctroa-Gomaat. complained that Mr. Brougham had
assumed that the witness lived at an Inn, and founded his (luta.
tion on that as,umptien.
Is it an Inn in which you lodge ?—I do not know whether it
is an Inn.

Is there a sign above the door ?—I never made the observaticn.
Have you had any bill brought to you to pay?—No (wi:k
emphasis).
Have you ever pcid any bill i—No ; but I h:.ve to pay.
Ate you to p.ly, yt.nrself, for your entertainment at this Inn. 3
—I have not yet been asked, and I do not know whether I
have to pay.
But are you to pay for your own keep?—l do not know.
IVere you ever in such a place before, where you did cot
know whether you sere to pay for your own keep or not ?
Lord FALMOUTH, from the Gallery, asked whether the
cross-examination was nearly concluded?—(airsif " Go en.")
Supposing that the business would close to-day at four O'clock,
he had made a private engagement accordingly, though he was
quite ready to sit till six or seven o'clock, if necessary.
Lord DONOUG II MORE thought the rule, if made, ought
to be adhered to. Nobody could tell whether the cruss-exa-
mination might not last two hours more. He thought that the
witness deserved protection, and th.it some part of the cross-
etamination might have been spared. The Noble Lord moved
an adjournment.
Earl GREY had seen nothing in the disposition of the Theism
not to give protection to the witness. Very material questions
to elicit the truth had been put, and he thought that no rule
cold/ be more injurious than one which forced the House to
separate at a critical mornent„by which the ends of justice might
be defeated. If a rule were made, he hoped it would be six-
tended to five o'clock.

Lord FALMOL7TH added, that he had not interpose) till
half-past four.
The LORD CHANCELLOR was in favour of adhering to
the rule. He had not entered the House this morning till five
minutes past ten, in consequence of consulting with the Judge*,
in a matter of lite and death; and their farther deliberation had
been postponed until after the adjournment to-day. As to the
nrotecdon of witnesses, he hoped that he should never fail se
much in his duty as to neglect to interfere when there-was occa-
sion. Bat except in a few terms dropped by the Learned Ccem-
sel, which he himself would ba the first to retract at any otlic,
time, nothing had occurred which called for his interference
They must give a Counsel credit for looking forward into a case
in a manaer in which their Lordships were incapable. Clues-
dons, apparently of no importance to-clay, might become of.
great importance in the next day's proceedings or those of the
day following. This the Counsel were able to appreciate much
better than their Lordships could, and no Counsel would with to
waste the time of the House by pbtting questions, except be
deemed them necessary ones. He thought that more time,
ought to be devieed to the proceedings. If they sat till five,'
instead of four, they would gain one hour each day-eheie
would make six in a week, no small saving considering What
they had to look forward to.
The Karl of LIVER; OOL did not object to live o'clock
being fixed in future as the hour of adjournment.
The House adjourned at a quarter before five o'clock,
the undeestendisig that in Future they Were to sit du AT,