Star.
London, England, 1817-12-19 00:00:00

LAIV INI'LLLIGL4VcE.

COURT OP RING'S BENCH. DECEMBER.ta.
MR. HONE'S TRIAL.
This being the day appointed. for the trial of Mr.
Hone, on A Criminal Information filed against him
by tote Attorney-General, the Court was crowded to
excess, at an early hour. by a most respectable audi.
tory. At half-past nine oic;uck Mr. Justice Aaaorr
took his seat on the Bench..when the names on the
Special Jury pannel were called over. until twelve
Gentlemen appeared. who were immediately sworn.
and certainly we never saw a more respectable body
of men assemblet in the box. Every face was en-
tirely new, none of the individuals haying, we believe.
ever iii bet ire as Spece4l Jurymen in London.
Th.+ Arrant:re GENERAL stated to the Jury the
nature of the ..ff.race with which the defendant was
caarged. should not take up much of their time
what be hid to adAress to them, because the libel,
which the defendant was charged with baring. pub.
hilted, must speak for itself. It would be impossible
for any one to hear the passage; read without being
struck with their offensive nature and tendency. The
publication in question was an offence against the
Religion of the country. One of the best and most
religious of all the Judges, that ever were distinguish-
ed in this country. he me Int the great and good Sir
Matthew Hale, had laid it down that Christianity
was part of the law of England, and of cou-se any
attack on Christianity was an attack, upon the laws
of• the country. The Church Service, which formed
a part of our Christian system, was established in
this c-untry by statute law passed in the reign of
Charles IL when it was found necessary to havea
general Conformity in the Public Worship. If, there-
five, sap attempt were made to vilify that system of
worship, and if such an attempt were let to parts with
impunity, Christianity would no longer be the law
oldie country. One of the pacts of a valuable Book,
which was here ridiculed was of the utmost impor-
tance—this was the Catechism. whose peculiar object
was to instil the principles of Religion into the minds
of the younger orders of die community, at the time
they were initiated into Christianity. and previous to
their being confirmed by the Bishop. The book also
contained that Creed. which was professed by diffe-
rent classes of Christians; also the Ten Command.
merits, which were of Dein° origin; and the Loan's
Prayer, which was dictated bit tho SAVIOUR of the
Wot Id. If these sacred writings and laws were to be
ridiculed. the worst if:ct must be produced on the
mends of the lower orders of people. Here the At.
toroey•General pointed out the satire of the Cate.
dikes, and thawed how it was parodied and ridi-
culed by the publication. which totaled the ground
of the present charge. He next shewed h6w the
Commandments bad been treated with contempt and
ridicule. [ While he was reading the passages, some
persons laughed at the phrases used, and Mr. Justice
As i•cr called on the Officers to take into custody any
Cllwho behaved• in such an indecent manaer.).-.
TTORNRY-GRNIAAL resumed ; he said, he was
sot sorry tor the indecent ebullition, that bad taken
place, because it was the best argument he could ad-
vent,. in support of this prosecution : it was because
Ike parody was capable or producing_ such an effect
-that be prosecuted the author of it. He next alluded
*the parody on the Luau's Prayer. It is gnomes.
seer fee 'ass to repeat any of the odious passages is
the peblitatiuns alluded to.
William Swanson produced the pamphlet charged
in the information, which he said he purchased on
she 11th of YebruasT last at Mr. How's shop, No.
flff, Fleet street. He purchased it either of a boy or
4.04 who was in attendance in the shop. The
pm Was two pence. Witness did mot molluscs har-
ms WINOht pamphlets there Wore ; bad boughs
some since. - There mom bills posted op, gonouncing,
this publication. This pamphlet wail a parody on
• citechism.
The parody was put in and mad by the Clerk.—
pie respect we owe to our Readers, prevents us from
nevus% any part of it. •
The Arsaness GIDIIIMIL• called on the Jury by
"ue bl— of the solemn (*ligation they had takatn—.by
these paths, Which were a postal the religion they
*we etier called on to protect...he stonjetet them, at
imetSltere of the ChristiasChuircbi,to declare by their
weedict that the religion of thir,,toomey shall not be
nifille4 and abused with inspnnity.i.
.14ary Hutchins said, that in she month of Fe-
he** last, he was the landlord of the house, No.
14$ Sisebetreet. Mr. Hone was then his tenant, and
Somilitied to be so until last blidstimmen. He sold
%oh said PmbPhiets.
Thomas White said he was a Clerk in the Tra-
wl:he produced the book of Common- Psayer cam.
r=ording to the Act of Parliament; it was
ble to the usual book published bthe
Lees Printer. and the Universities. It woul4 be
.crinssaal in. any others, except the King's Printer, and
she ow wive:silks, to print that book.
This was the case on the part of the prosecution.
Mr. Hone now rue to suds his own defeace, not
having employed any .COueseL He said he felt
hinarlf Slimming under eessiderable diffitelay at
this moment, in consequence of his never having been
'in the habit of public speaking, and having never ad-
dressed a public assembly before. He, thaefore,
toped as every indulgence would be afforded him
se by present situation. He declared be was wboliy
ensonecious of the guilt. nettle imputed to him; and
that it he was Realty the Jury would nit see him
there. It might be in their recollection, that as tar
bark as the mouth of May last, he had been *Pore-
/temied,turder a *meet from the Chief Justice of
the Zing's Bench,' and afterwards brought into that
Court', to pbad is certain informations laid agaion
bins. He did not, however, then plead, because he
believed the proceedingi h information to be uneoc-1
sthstiestal. and such as bad never been contemplated
by the original makers of cos kftea;.beeausse,tbese in.
fossations laid area at thowietif elan Attorney.'
Cleneral, without eny chairs of hpressatoteut before
amid Jury ; they- moseiresen to be taken up in*
seminary manosr, as had bi lbtatese with himself,
to Sasirer to ;stormed's), whieb-hir did not know to
meg buss filed. These eras agefises round for his
Rog ifeadiog as that time. which was, the enormous
expeffne be inset have bees poi to. The expense
*Was s scat is Iftilwally pea soli pleading to as
iofesselion wee *skeletal to of Inahltlo, and
suck ea WNW would to hits be his ones mid. ktit,
applied to the Court for copies el intense/Am ;

Court would not grant thee s - -
he did not know whet Itched, Wan specific,alli Chi:-
ged witht Sir William Gerona;, the late Attorney
General,. had charged him with blasphemous
cations; now it seemed they were not blasphemous :
he was charged with being evil disposed, and with
wickedly and impiously devising to throw a scandal
on the Christian Religion. Now he must say, that
the charge of blasphemy originally laid in the infor-
mation, but since ablndoned. had the effect of rais-
ing an immense prejudice against him in the public
mood, and.he felt how difficult it would be for him
to get over it. He now stood there as a most injured
man, with a rent weight of public prejudices against
him. On a former occasion, when he complained of
not having copies of the informations. another infor.
Diatom was filed. Now, be would say, that if one
hundred informations were filed, he would not plead
to one of them, unless he was furnished with copiei
of the same. He had been treated with great hard-
ship and injustice, and with great inhumanity, by the
Chief Justice, by whose entrant he had been appre-
hended. He was seised on a Saturday night, as he
was entering his own house. The Officer,. who took
him would not suffer him to go and inform his fa-
mily of what happened to him : they took him to
jock-up-house, and there he was kept until Monday ;
then he was forced to go to Westminster Hall. to
plead to informations of which he knew nothing.—
When he came into Court he was so ill as to be un-
able to stand: he applied to the, C curt toe perritis.,ion
to sit down. and the answer of Lord Ellenborough
was 40 No 1" delivered in a tone of voice which might
be board 'at the other end of Westminster Hall. He
was then taken to the King's Bench Prison, in the
most deplorable state of health, owing to the inhuman
tregitimpi of. Lord Ellenborough—
Here Mr. Justice Aseori interrupted the defers.
dont,, stating he was extremely sorry to do so to any
Person who was making his defence;. but where, as
'in this case, it beconie absolutely necessary, he could
not. refrain. It was the duty of Lord Ellenborough
to-Pursue the course of the Court, and it was not CUS•
tornori for defendants to sit *bile the informations
filed against them were licit* read.
Mr, Home proceeded.—He said lie felt it necessary
to state the sufferings he had aSanh experiessoed is
consequence of this prosecolion,',Jfe eii mimed-
vetted on the unnecessary olleiasnesi of those who
would take the trouble of wading and prosecuting
such trifling publications as these. The Attain,
General had described them as political squibs. So
they were—they were nothing else but political
squibs—and be denied titers was any thing impious
Or iircligious in them. The Jury, he said, had so.
thing to try but to ascertain whether he bad pub.
lisped them with a wicked intention ? they had no-
thing to do with the tendency of the publications.
If they thought that he bad no evil intention in pub.
behiug them, they must give him a verdict of ac-
lquittal. So far back as the ykar 1771, it was the in-
tention of several enlightened persons to bring in a
Bill to ascertain the mode of prosecuting for libels.
-The late Mr. Burke was one of them. than whom
there was no man who more wished to preserve the
religion and murals of society. On a motion made
by Mr. Dowdeswell for such a Bull, Mr. Burke niade
a speech, in witie.h he.loid it dons as a constitiltiosal
doctrine, that no man should be tried for a libel ira-
cept by judges who were his equals; that that' should
loot be chosen by the Crown ; mid Viet these judges
abeold determine the intention and tendency of
a work. Mr. Burke also complained that the_spitit
of the Star Chamber bad then migrated to Wea-
-1
gainsaid Hall ; and the remedy he proposed was, that
juries should be taken from the mass of the people's
and that they should be empowered to convict or are
quit without being influenced by the Judge. The
Bill of Mr.'Llowdeswell was, however, then kia; and
the business was suspended soil the year 1791. when
:the late Mr. Fox introduced and carried the celebra-
ted Bill for ascertaining the Rights of Juries. This
Bill at once enlzned and fixed the power of Juries,
who are now to ins on the whole of the case..
The charge now against him was as intention copra
papas impiety sad irreligion; and If an hundred
thousand of the poblieatioos had been circulated, doe
intention with which he published them was the point,
the Jury had to try, He spurned the chew of ho.
piety, and he new professed himself to be a Qristion,
with every kind of reverent, for the doctrines of
Citaus. He bed been vilified all over the counter,
and called a wretch, who made out a miserable exist.
ence by selling blasphemous publications; but Ire
defied any man to stand up in that Court, and say,
that in the whole conduct of heir life there bad been
any thing which could warrant such an imputation.
Again he spurned the imputation of blasphemy or
irreligion ; and-his should thew that his character was
the wiry opposite., The Secretary of State had risen
night after night in the House of Lords, denouncing
him and his publications, and holdidg him up to the
pablie radium Ind prejudice. This was a conduct he
could not contemplate without indignation. He had
indeed frequently differed from dime with whom he
associated ; and his Independence of mind had pm
dueed him many tummies; but he never did any mut
an injury ; and if there Were any injury in the_pre-
ient book, it hippenia lioin mistake and not sill -fir-
' tendon. No man had a greater respect for the Co.,
stituted Authorities of the country. If he differed
from persons in power, numbers of the most respect-
ruble people differed also from them. He should' slit
doivit and acknowledge inmsellguilty, if the Actor:
my-General could point out any of his former publi:
Cult*s that contained any thing libelluos or impious.
The greater part of these had been written by bins-
self ; and WHIM a man was always in the habit of
writing, he must some way or other have disclosed
his real sentiments, if such were of an evil and imply
.ors nature. But although he had often written in al
hurry to procure bread for his toady fora week, he
MUM uttered a disloyal or an impious•thoughtei—
The detendant best proceeded to notice the mode in
which Juties were sttuck by the Master of the Crown
011ie,.
Mr. Justice Amoss asked him what relation this
topic had with the question which the Jury now had
to try ? He conceived it was aa unnecessary trespass
,oe the time of the Court.
The defendant replied, that he maceived what he
was about to state. as very material. He thee re-
newed his complaint which he bad made before, re.
'poem the mouses ys width the Master of the
:rows, OiLe had struck a Jury to try him.
The Juno& again said, he could not me how this

ebtle'olvis titivate to the defeti.e. itiestion
.thi Court.
One of the Jury impressed his opinion that the de:
fendant Might assign a reason for what he was about
to state j and then the Judge said he would allbw
hi o to do so.
Mr. Hoste.then went on with the narrative of what
he had already stated, some time two in the Com of
King's Bench, respecting the mode in which the Jury
was struck, and -he contended that it was most unjust
and unconstitutional for any Officer of the Crown to
possess such a power. He assured the Jury that he
had not the feast objection to any of the Gentlemen
who then sat to try him ; and that he considered
himself as safe in their hands as with any other men;
but he felt it necessary so state the facts he witnessed
in order to sheer' the efforts that had been made by
persons acting under the Crown to procure convic-
tions. He again impressed on fbem the necessity of
judging only. as to what his intention was. It he had
no other consideration but for himself, he should feel
very little affected by the result of this trial, if it
should go against him ; he might probably pass his
time patiently with his books in one of Mr. Jones's
small rooms ; and indeed he had already experienced
many civilities and accommodations from Mr. line.;
but then, he had a large family who looked to him
solely for support. Hi had passed alrhis life !along
books; from a book-reader he became a book-seller;
he was not brought up to any handicraft employ-
ment; and the selling of books became his sole em-
ployment : but it probably was his misfortune, that
he was more fond of reading books than a bookseller
ought to have been. He had read a great many old
books which were published before as well as after
the time of Elisabeth—many of these abounded with
parodies. There were many parodies which did not
ridicule the thing parodied ; and such was the de-
scription of parody now charged against him. He
then held in his hand a work published last August,
by Mr. Blackwood, a most respectable bookseller in
Edinburgh: to this work, entitled the Edinburgh
Magazine, there was a parody which he would read.
It purported to be the translation of an ancient work
contained in a library at Paris; it was written in imi.
tation of a chapter of Ezekiel; and its object was to
ridicule certain rival booksellers and writers at Edin-
burgh and gave an allegorical description of the
u:w Magazine. He read another parody on a pas-
sage in the Bible, wherein the Edinburgh Review
'was described by bring compared to a born. Mr.
Blackwood, the publisher of the work, was a most
respectable man.
Mr. Justice Amon said. his respect for him was
not increased by the publication just quoted.
The AtfollbiltY-G/LNZRAL said, that, in point of
law, no man could be suffered to justify one libel by
reading another ; and he contended. that Mr. Hone
should net be allowed to read other libels in justifies-
don of Ms own. _ _ _

Mr. Hotta replied, that what he read was not a
libel, until it was proved to be such, by the verdict
of a Jury ; nor was the publication charged against
him a libel ; and it he had thought it to be such, he
would not have been there that day ; for he had been
at large on his own recognizance, and he might have
gone away or quitted the country. But he would
not flinch from the prosecution, and he wished to
chew, is the best manner that he -eculd, that this
publication was not a libel. That was the point, and'
the only point, on which he tested his defence. The
aboelbelft he heard that the 'publication was disap-
proved of, he stopped the sale of it. It was published
on the 14th, and was suppressed by him on the 22d
of February and he trusted the Jury would feel
thin there was too much good sense in the world, to
'suppose ithat the public could be affected by a pub-
deaden of this kind. The defendant next quoted a
,little parody, written by Doctor Lemont, recom.
Amending temperance; and it was written in imitation
of Scripture. He neat quoted a parody, written by
Martin Luther, to whom the whole Protestant world
was indebted fat the reformation of our Religion Irom
all corruptions and abuses ; and this man wrote a
pored?. Martha Luther was a parodist as well as
William Hsi**. He ridiculed his 'adversaries by a
parody on one of the Psalms, de Blessed is the pain
who wallet not in the, &c." He nest quoted a pa-
"wily on the Loan's Prayer, which was delivered
from the pulplt—
Tb hope there Is nothing offensive in it.,
The defendant said it was uttered by Dr. Boyce,
Dean of Canterbury, in the reign of James .1. He
began to read it, when—
The AMR said, the parody was most improper,
whom: the author was.

The defendant said. be could produce instances of
most learned and pious men, whojnculcated instruc-
tion in that way. Bishop Latimer had preached two
sermons with a pack of cards each time under his
hands ; and he illustrated his text by the cards, as
well as the triumph which pious men were lake to
obtain- The truant, be said. was the triumph—and
he desired his bearers to cast their hearts on that card.
He quoted several parodies on Pra). rs and the
SCrilattrep all of which were of a political tendency ;
=sof these was found in the works of that excellent
Man. Lord Somers; it was in imitation of the ge-
nealOgy of Canter, in the first chapter of St. Mat-
thew. and Contained an allegorical account of the
family and birth of the Reformation. He next quoted
a parody on the first Psalm, entitled Pulitical Mer-
riment," published in 1714. in favour of the Bruns-
wick family. which had then come upon the Throne
ot England, and that parody was exactly similar to
his. The Reverend Mr. Croxill, while at Osford,
had written a book, Containing religious parodies—
the title was the a Fair Circasiian," and it was
well known to most men of academic learning. Atter
quoting pilotage: from several other books, he came
to e collection of papers. which had been- published
114 years ago, by the Association then held at the
Crown and Anchor, if or protecting liberty and pro-
perty against Republicans and• levellers. Among
these was a parody on the Carechism, by John
Reeves. Esq. who was at the heed of the Alsilcia-'
don—it was entitled the "Freeholder's Catechisur;"
it was all of a political tendency, and was an almost
exact Imitation of the Christian Catechism. ne his-
tory of the Westminster election also abounded with
parodies on Scripture. and.osi the book of Common
Prayer, and none of the author: of any of the paro-
dies be dad quoted, bad ever been 'Fruseeuted. A
parody eatitled " The Chronicles of the Kings of
FArtand." etc. was published in theyeat 174% and'
afterwards thpablished by Dodsley, than wl.om there

' never was in Ermland. a Mott telilecvs,
moral man. This book gave ri v horn"
sketch of the Sovereigns in England their Ail
and genealogy ; and was written emit rly in the
Scriptnte. The same bask was af:erward%
tatted down to the time of the French Revnlwic
alluded to Thomas Paine, Right Hon.
&c. A celebrated work, enii,led the "
an allusion to the Westminster Scru:iny, conieined
passage exactly similar to the publication oiWt
the Court.' It was a ludicrous description of wi
passed at the Seriviny. and striven in the Script,
style. If the system of prophane parodies had ex'
so long with impunity, and it they had then delis
by eminent clergymen from the pulpit, how,
would ask, was he to know whether he had acted
m;nally in publishing his parody ? Hedwidounlidt
tempt to defend all these parodies ; but he
prove- that the moment be heard his parody •
offensive, he stopped the publication ; he
even' let an intimate old friend have a copy when
called for it. Hittite gone on with, and not
pressed that pte.llication, he should have made a •
sum of money, which w,uldhave enabled him
able Counsel, to defend him that day. He
a parody in the same style with his, puhlished ,
use of the troops under Lord WelliiagtoS, and
was a Ministerial parody.

Mr. Justice Anhorr. —Sir. T do not wish to
any mire of tl.at read. I kno.v nothing
rial parodies.
Mr. Horn replied, that it was
him to state that circumstance, bec,
vinced that had his been a Mir
should not have been brought there
ther paper which be produced,
handed about the streets as a Chrism:
season of the year, and it purported
from our SAVIOUR ; this publication,.
ledge, been in existence fur thirty
The ATTORNEY GENIIREL took
declared it to be an impious libel,
Mr. Justice ABBOTT was of the
Mr. HONE expressed his surprise
had never before been disapproved
any of the civil or ecclesiastical
he concluded he should quote one
that was written by a man who
Minister, one of his persecutors (i
cution carried on against him), at
now to be in his place in that Court,
alluded to was Mr. Canning, w!
rodyin the deli Jiteobia, beginning
Last of the anointed five behold, sue
The directorial Lama. sovereign priest.
Lepass—whom Atheists worship—at
Bow their meek heatis—aide we wntrt
Mr. Justice Arson.—Here is '
Cunning is the author of these verses
see that it is a parody on any pat
It appears to be a parody on. some
and some of Pope.
Mr. Hoar.—lt is certainly a pat
des. I know it must be unpleasai
ship to hear Mr. Cannieg's name
feelings oblige me to do so.
Mr. Jostice Ansorr.—l have
ing, at hearing Mr. Canning's, or
Dam here, except when named contrar,
of' law and justice. I trust I evitcjil
shall, whilst sitting in this place, inter,
purpose, whether the individual
or anti-ministerial in his politics.
Mr. Hose resumed.-.He was
been betrayed into any warmth off
no intention whatever of saying al
ful to his Lordship. Matt n bimi
ca the Scriptures ; and this Hymi
certain parts of Scripture.. The
the Leviathan referred to the eel
the Book of Job. Thi rest cent:
pension and some of the very
Psalm, as well as the general turn
et other parts.
" Praise ye him all hh angels ; praise ,
1/‘ Praise ye him, Mu and muse; praiser, k
" Beasts and all cattle • creeping things
Psalm 115, vents 2, ;and to.
This publication was aceompat
Gilray, a most admirable caricaturist,
who, to the day of his death, enjor•-•
his Majesty. In that print, whi
'hand, the late, duke of Bedford
the Leviathan of Job. with a bow
with Mr. Foe and Mr. Tierney
passage in Job was—.. Cans', thei
than with a hook or his tongue
thou latest down r'—Chap. 41,
been advised to subpoena Mr. Cat
but he had really abstained from
Canning's feelings. He bad
awkward figure Mr. Canning wouli
placed in the witness's box, to ans-
he should put to him. He did .
rily to hurt any man's feelings, and
such a course necessary to his deh
which contained this. was, as he
general subscription of the 10inisti
Canning school—the notoriety of
publication was sufficient for hi
it Was plain that the object of
rody was the same as.that of hit
laical ;—and it proved that Cite
authors of the parodies attempted
always intended to fix on the prof
He should now %flew that parodiet
with the most laudable, and even
tentihns. He remembtred heario
laiiu Hill say, that the Devii had
his ibrel vice, and that he should ti
the service of Christ. That PoPt•
tact beAuwed much attention, and
the music of ills chapel, and had
popular or profane songs, that
the same tunes, words, the genet
which, resembled the songs itt
tannic was one. In the work wei
and other 4ecomittations of Disseni
pop's Selectioneirublished by
braced Minister, were many by
tunes. The hymn—
.. There L. a land of pure delight.
Where Saints itionortel
was set to the tune o: a Drink to .
eyes. and I will pledge with mine,
set to the tune of .4 Tell me, bai,
and oue comparing the Christiatel
to the prospect which Moses had

tel
glan
en
vas
ic.cial44dhirf:ti' leaipen:lhitrynhisawnediunetlani rp.r.aisdnr ntmhhfs °bei
nc‘hc,tinari:-ti panvc t, ub
tn.encli
iltnetrholution at: l°
hli
des
:he
d
• ,klOOl, 111
Hon. Williarnipr 11
d the •• Bnitiaa.,i tile ail
Icru:iny, coal Nine(' 4 44
amnia,"
Para4lies had existed 111
I had 11.-ra deliveted
're pulpit, how, be Itel
• ? He did nit at.
lies ; but he should ""
Parody had been as
turn ; he would not
ase a copy when
with, and not sup.
1J have made a lay at
'e enabled him to te. '
tat day. quote. It
published for th
VellitigtoS, and tha,
It
do not wish to he,, Co
nothing of Ministt• wl
on
as mast natural fa :I
because he was eon, 1,4
iaisteri.tl parody, as!
sere that day. An J"
was a placard our
arismas carol at th tei
ported to be a lett• tel
tion had, to his kno4
ty years. irr
ik up this paper, ant ' '
el, not St to be tea.
to same opinion.
prise that this pa.
red of or noticed •
auth pestles. Belo 'r
one more parody, a
r was now a Cabi
(tor this was a per
rod a man who oug-
:curt. Ihe man • '„'
ho published a p
ng thus 1
sod lease
Hut— o
—at wbese nod
Aare a God/ ike.&e• .1
is no proof that is
verses neither do 1
at of the Scripture ,
ome lines of Alto
parody on the Cant
slant to your Lot c
e mentioned, but .
no unpleasant fee •
re any other person'
contrary to toe 111
,eirtqf tee end ev
ce, interpme tot t!: c
nanieJ be ministers
as sorry for havin
of rips vision j he lts
,c
any dull; disrespect
melt was a peed; .1
am directly parodied 0
e passage respecting
elebrated passage is u
tented the turn ut es-
words of the 1484
iris of the expressive
ye him an hie hosts.
ye Pim all yestatset lirh
imp and flying fewir-
lanied by a plate b!
taturist, since due
joyed a pensi..n ?eon
Phich he held in h:
was reptcsen'ed a •
ouk in Lis nose,
, on his back.
hcu draw out LT7:2*
to with a curd whi:h
l, verse 1. He nil
tanning as a witiesi,
Dm a regard to tile.
reflected what as
rould cut if lie 'are n
swer questions .ch•ch
not wis:t tinne,:essa. •
Wire had riot ..11-414
fence. But the tre4
said, pubt;slied bye
inters of the and
of the nature of that
his purpusr.
F Mr. Cattmi!lg's i
is Own :—it wets ro• i,
e ridicule t:.e fe
ed to racte• .4 AS 'ICI
Oi
Dduc!irn
ies might he w•-•ttel
•en with reli);:otni
ring the Rev. at,ti•
d trea,:ties enough ii tl
try to eol:st them !:1
)111..t ps e,tc het hoti vi
utd weer ex2e•ls‘. tv
it parodic,* .;.e ..:0•1
t is to say, had h
metal dispositivo ct ft
question--Mule F.:- e
eli known to Paris:
ssenters called
Di. Rippon, a ""
ymns set to proJI•
tl
delight,
au,' tee.
eaal(b);.tdntiten:sles.oe'fig,olengtElAwycelloWptitlrt:Soiveltu..S.
rh-L•C'