Star.
London, England, 1817-05-08 00:00:00

PARLMMENTART PROCESDRIGS.

HOUSE OF LORDS, MAY 7.
"ensee'llt Word at nomination and Smelly. respecting the
Appealof Raadall o. Doe," on the demise of Roake and others.
'Judgment postpoised.
In the Scots Cause of " Black .. Campbell," Counsel were
partly beard.—To proceed 'gain on Friday.

VICTORY AT ALCIIRkt.

The LORD CHANCELLOR acquainted the
House that he had received a kites front Admiral
Lord Viscount Exmouth, inclosing one which had
been received by him from Vice-Admiral the Baron
Von Capelien, Commander of the squadron of his
Majesty the King of the Netherlands, acknowledging
his receipt Of. their Lordships' Vow of Thanks to
ham. the Vice-Admiral, and the squadron under his
command. fur the. brad and gallantry displayed, and
the assistance agurded by them at the reduction of
Algers. The ipAind letter was read by his Lord-
ship, and was. ,s make of the high and grateful'
sense of the g 1 peow conferred on him and his
sp/ter
squadron, by 1 dships' Vote of Approbation
gio
and Thanks...--, - nommttnications were, in the'
usual way. ordersi raise entered upon the omas.
The Marquis CHOLMONDELEY (as Lord
Steward) reported the Answer of his Royal Highness
the Prince Regent to the last Address of their Lord-
ships (touching the production of certain.documents).
implying, that directions would be given accordingly.
Owen's Divorce Bill passed through a Committee,
of the whole House, and was reported without may
amendment.
The LORD CHANCELLOR moved that the'
Bill, if engrossed, be read a third time on Friday
nest ; and took occasion to notice, with a view to the
consideration of Noble Lords on that day, that the
Bill still retained the clause smoked by the orders of
the House in the first instance, for probiliiting the in-
termarriage of the offending patties. .
Several private Bills were brought pp from the
Commons itor Sir J. GRAMM, E. KNATCHIRIU, and
others, aed-raed the ant tinsts...Adjouried.,
• HOUSE OF COMMONS. .
The BMW Wormed the House that be had received a
letter hem Lord Saairath. iodide, one boa the Dods Admi-
ral Capetian. eoprosdog his grateful sew of the honour con-
ferred on him by the Vote of Thanks of the HMSO of Commas.
The second reading of the London Clergy NI was postponed
dil this dif six wests.
Os chopped*" of Mr. LUSHINI3TOO, a new Web was or-
dered is; the swiss of i Mensbet kr the Borough of Dorches.
ter. in the 110001 of Bit Sanwa tiisepherd. who has accepted the
AA
new Web ohs lowed for she lorovgls at Eyre, in the MOM
of tar Was. Ostrow who hod acospiod she 00os of ow of His
Majesty's litmus dabs Eschewer.

117/11/1a BOAM •
Mr. HAMMY pgre mkt dot ha *old. to-marrow; more
lie die appalatasast al a Coaalukta. ea ivy** fate eh eau, of
the Uplinks et do 111aNit Paden at biareira.

_
SK sAssuE'rftrium'sc;""rosep.to present a pe-
tition frost a paraisiNkoadJoha Montgomery, why
was arrested at 99d of February last,
los a warrant, eb(litippiat as participant in sedi-
sinus premien- fatition detailed the CifClllll-
- of the Willows's arrest, which wok place
while's, was in hallg ,that he was confined in a dark,
unwholesome cell Jae three days and four nights.
The petitioner Mutated himself as totally igno-
rant of thempulatm hp
at against b, and stated 4 that
on his denng all knowledge* them ua tuna.


cumstances of this caw, fig tlie power vested ;n tie
Sheriff' Substitute seemed to have been exerri.ed by
him to a most nnjuniti extent. It had origami
that the warrant on oirch one of the p• Irma Appre-
hended at Glasgow had t,ken up, did not even
contain his Christian name, nor an cia.ct description
of his place of abode.
Mr. Fl NI, y that with respect to the cha-
racter of -tbe'petiti.m.vr, he (nlO .ipt, say any thing,
nor had he made any inquiry. AL. ;9 the :imam.
dye non wb' j) he v' at sust
, speed: in 174. Cs:rise tame, upon iZ ry, it ter.
unity ' t that this was that fact. lsot he slit-
derstood that-by the law t'f Scotland this was no ob-
jection to thelegality of the %want, if the descrip.
lion which it contained was sufficient to identify the
individual. With respect to the treatment 4vhich the
misfortunate persons arrested at Glasgow had met
with, he had made very particular inquiries, and it
turned out that all the statements contained in the

petitions presented to the House on this subject,
were totally false. or exceedingly miarepresented.
The rooms were not damp ; there was no want cf
food ; in short. besides the mere circumstance 8f con-
finement, there was no hardship whatever as to the
situation of those persons. Every precaution was
taken by the Magistrates to accommodate these un-
f.,rtiroate persons in the best way that circumstances

would admit ; and he could assure the House, thst

uut of 25 persoos committed. 23 or 24 were :seem*_
modated with the mast comfortable apartments that
could-be wished lot;• in no disagreeable a situation.
'He need not detain-Nei:House tai go through all the
*negations contained itihe petit' ; hut if he were
!n.do so, he could *AA- y dispose of every part of it.
:Ma was there a more.exaggerated picture uf pri-
vations than drat whieb it contained. He wonde:c3

very much that the Hong urable and Learned Getele-
man should have been so very much i :Tose.' on as
to the. facts.
Mr..l. P. GRANT having fately vi.ited that port
of Scotland where the events alluded to had taken
place, felt himself calkd upon to bear testimony on
the subject. As to the allegations contained in the
petition of the person named Weir, he bold. only
say that he had himself spoken with that person, who
repeated to him the same statements that were con-
tained in his petition, and that he (Mr. Grant) had
*very reason to believe it to be true. While on .the
Iloof he thought it his duty to esamute the plies sv4reie
these persons had been confined, and he mutt say,
that although the gaol of Glasgow was certainly a
very elegant building, and kept in good order, yet
he found that the statements of the petitioners were
generally borne out by the facts. He did not mean,
however, to impute any blame to the Magistrates of
Glasgow, further than this, that whi:e the gaol was
crowded with these unhappy persons, be thought
they ought to have visited the prison more frequently
than t'iey did. Upon the whole, he thought, that
in this respect there was a grievance to be complained
of. As to the law of Scotland, if it were the law io
take up perwns without havingtheir names distinctly
stated, he could or 4 say i.e never heard it latfuie.
But it was not the • Fiveri Scotland. The law of
Scotland contained no such monstrous proposition.
Mr. BRAGGE BATHURST said, if there was
eily irregularity in the warrant, the Sheriff was bound
to answer for it. On .a iecapitulatiiin of the real
facts as to the treatment of the prisoners, as compared
with the statements in their petitions, it was found
that these statements were grossly exaggerated.
The petition was then ordered to lie on the table.
Sir SAMUEL ROMII.LY moved, that the pe-
tition be printed. and contended, that the answer
given on the subject ought not to be deemed satis-
factory by the House—(Hear, hear.) 'lire Hon.
Member then restated some of the strtngest circum-
stances of this case, and another which he brought
before the House some time ago,' and everessed his
surprise that the Honourable Member ft i Glasgow
could eulogize the Sheriff substitute, who on heating
the mau declare the whole charges to be fads-, told
him, that this denial of his looked ersemely like
guilt—(Hear, and laaiglaer,) and then reminded him
to gaol till next morning. It thins appeared, Oat
One of those persona had lieu taken by i. istake, mist
therother on evidence, which it was said could riot
be disclosed. How could it be ..iid, that the law of
Scotland was such, that warrants might be granted
with the insertion of the sirname only ?If that were
the case, several of his Honourable Friends near him
were not safe, for the Campbells and the 'Mackin.
cosh's were very common names in Scotland—(Untie,
ands laugh.)
the Honourable wait heard serlotlyl4iinnedmiakthainst
his charges, but the house seemed little disposed to
0 alioßu
rA, Gb
icGE Memberß .Twl
listen to the answer which he had to make on behalf
~f the Magistrates whose characters were attacked.
The Sherif substitute declared in his memorial that
he bad used the words imputed to him, and this was
attested by two pencils velio were present. He
ihaublitit unfair that thtt of Weir should new
let
be reifated. The ins HI - jiven in the warrar:
steted,(tbat he lived in' a'teriain court lending out of
Haleiaton-street, and Itimeteelared that viers was
no iitluiriaerson of the tai e name lived . there. 1:
vras.uot then very unsaft‘:"he should have thought,
to act on such information, whatever mii.,llt be the
law of Scotland on the stit,j,et.
Mr. FINLAY insisted th:it the facts were etagge-
rated in the. petition.
Lord BINNING got up to defend the Sherlr r,t
Lanarkshire, but, being told that he was out men-
. . '
' .

,
timed at all in the business, his Lordship sat down
urn, amidst the laughter f the House.
The petition was then ordered to be printed.
VIZ REV. MR. THMILWALL.
The Order of the Day for the attendance of the
Rev. Thomas Thiriwall having been read,
Mr. BENNETT moved, that the Rev. Thomas
•Thirlwall be now called in.
Mr. BATHURST was •far from objecting to the
motion I but before entering on a proceeding which
was rathrr new in these times, be thought that it
would be proper for the House to consider what son
of animadversion—
The SPEAKER begged pardon. for interrupting
the Right. Hon. Member ; but he thought it would be
more in course for the House to hear what the party
had to say for himself, and then to consider what sort
of punishment the offence might deserve.
• Mr. BATHURST said; that before calling in the
person, whose conduct was now in question, he would
wish to know whether the Honourable Gentleman
ogposite (Mr: Bennett), intended to be so tenacious
of the privileges of the House, as extended to its
Committees, that when any thing wss published
which was an infringement of these privileges, the
person so offending should be immediately called to
the Bar of the House.
• Mr. C. W. WYNNE rose to order. He imagined
that the decision of the House, by which the atm-
dance Of the person in question was ordered, bad al-
ready decided the point to *Web the Right Hui.
Gentleman seemed inclined to direct his observations.
The SPEAKER—The Right Hon. Gentleman
(Mr. Bathurst) had certainly a right to address the
House on the present question. The House had cer-
tainly ordered the attendance of the party ; but the
question at present before the House was, that the
person be now called in.
Mr. BATHURST said, that admitting for argu-
ment sake, that the present case was one which called
for the animadversion of the House, he wished to'
know how far it was meant to enforce the privileges
of the House against the individual in question._ He
apprehended that the House certainly was bound to
hake any breach of privilege against one of its Com-
tnittees as much as against the House itself. But the'
Committee against which the individual, whose case
was now before the House, bad offended, was not the
only one which had been libelled out of doors. Of
AThea
this he would produp an inst lice in a moth surda.
bus and audacious attack op . 'Finance Commits'.
[The Right Hun. Gentleman read an eahict
from a Newspaper, contain' n virulent aid:Dili-
sive attack on the Finance C inittee, which reeti-
mated it as a Committee, the *O ;pet of which was not
the abolition but the preseriation of sinecures.) -He
' w sued the House to consider how far it would go in
il:c pretent.case. Because if, 'hi this case, any seve-
rity was exercised, there were other cases, perhaps,
more flagrant, which other Hon. Gentlemen might
think it their duty to bring before the House.'
Mr. WYNNE said, he was sure be would be the
last man in the House who would be wanting in sup-
port of the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Bathurst)
as to any case where.the authority of the House, or
of any of its Committees, was reviled or impeached.
Bat thm it was to be considered that each common
rest on its olio particular grounds $ and that chino
Mild' be nothing more injurious than *hen any of i
.case was brought forward, to say that there Mee
such and such other libels against other Committent
which were equality atrocious, and yet had not been
punished. Certuoly he bad often seen in the public
.prints-astacks on the privileiges of the House. which,
he regnued, had been passed over by the House.—
But here was a case which impeached the authority
di a Committee while exercising one of the most im-
portant functions of the House, Daniell, its ingnist
tonal power.' • The charge made against the
thine* was chit of gross partiality. It had been de-,
*ermined by the Committee _that this attack upon it
.should be noticed to the IlOtiths'and it was in birth-
pacity of Chairman Of the,Cilstinittee. had not; ital
coming forward to espriveL hie individual epatioiss+
that the Hon. Gentlemaii.(ilittennett) brought fore
ward the subject. TM diak, thtrefore, was *AL .+
Oie of the Committees of thillifoose called 11430artile'
,Hoase for protection of its posiileges. This canine*
;guilt-and recorded on the Journals of the House.'
The libel was acknowledged by its author. His at-
militia was ordered by the House ; and new, if he
was, not called to the bar, the House would virtually!
Othitoviledee that the• imputation which he had east
'upon the Committee was will founded.
' Mr. BROUGHAM could sot refrain from saying
' • few words upon a question which involved some
'Tarp:serious consideratims, as respecting the privi-
lejtes sot only of radioman, bur also of the people.
Kitt) comparing the libel now in question with any
ether libels, .be thought it was very useless. He
walla remind the Right Hoomirable Gentleman
iMr: Botherst) that in the late Secession which took
lilscir en* tietrikge. about seven row ago, during the
fiataill ** that occasion. he (IN. Bioughans) hArl in
tie band a pamperer which aaaaliald a liballatla tek
Ilaik,not ripen the conduct of the Howe--not xithir!,
she *lnduct of say oche Committees, but most soar-
Aims animadversions on the parliathentary conduct
.of some individual Members in that House, who were
'motioned by name. It was his wish to bring before
• 'the House at that time the authors of thee libilt $
but on consulting with oh Hon. Friend. betru per.
'seeded, tbet when the question was upon one libel
it was mu in any way to the point to being fogy
instatices of other libels. , This moor at that'
:seemed to him quite satisfactory, and be thonghi :it
110 still. In the presentees,. it wits so defence of thi
Reverend Gentleman to say, that there were ethic
. libels agaiiist other Committees, and as 'machinate
as his. Bit although this was no defence,„yet in a ,
portioning the punishment. it'would be a very jeid
reason why it should beheads very nnxlerehb at•M"
respect to the.getterst Wite'ser ' of anintadoentialit to
thopeoceedings of tit!, he certainly: theEbta
that. unless-the Baste ofpuing such apish* (Ms
was ankh more illosidthen it had hitherto. bit
would be tar more dent able for the House to pat 4-
self on the higher smote having its conduct epos
to public discussion, than al Mad too (web,
upon
its-privileges. bur, in extending this Ikons.* sound
discretion should be °Waved to keep it wit* doe
Wends. .. •
Lord CASTLEREAGH observed, that there
scented to be some very conaiderable distinction =de
by the Hon. Galileo= ta Ole other side of the

House, as to the way in which they would notice
offences against privilegt. If these offences • were
committed-against a Committee which was under the
more immediate protection of the other side of the
House, no mercy was to be shown ; but if against
any other Committee, it might be abused and cried
down, and all its privileges trampled upon without
giving much camera to .the Hon. Gentlemen who
were now so tenacious on the question of privilege.—
If the press was to be allowed to deal is censures
against.the House, this licence Amid be permitted
fairly and impartially, and ought.not to be abridged
in favour of any party. As to the present case, he
was glad that such a rigorous exercise of the privi.
leges of the douse had not begun upon his side of
' the House. (Heal, hear, hear.)
Mr. W. SbfITH thought that nothing could be
more fair or reasonable than what bad been just laid
down by the Noble Lord. It used formerly to be
the practice of Parliament, when the language of any
individual in the House was commented upon out of
doors, to call the person to account who censured it.
But this privilege could not be acted upon now, when
the debates were not confined to the walls of the
House ; but a portion of the House was set apart for
the public. (Cries of Order ! Order!) He was aware
he was quite out of order, but it was the shortest way
of expressing what he meant.
The SPEAKER said, if the Honourable Gestic-
man was aware he was out of order, it was to be
hoped he would avoid a repetition of the disorderly
expression.
Mr. W. SMITH went on end described that what •
he meant was, that now when the debates of the ,
House were circulated all over the kingdom, it cnuhl
not be eipected that the privileges of the House
should be insisted on with much severity, nor was it
desirable that they should.
Sir S. ROMILLY wished the House to consider
out of what the offence in the present case arose. It
was against a Committee on Police, and on that
branch of Police which related to the licensing of
Public-hottses. Surely there could be no sullen
more free from party politics. And yet it was said,
because the Chairman of that Committee happened to
sit upon the Opposition side of the House, that those
on that side of the House were desiroos of abridging
the Liberty of the Press. He compared the offences
of breach of privilege of this House to contempts
against Courts of Justice, and said, that what made
-
the present case particularly Alt,* wale that it was
an attempt to prejudice the Houle egitinst one of iti
Committees, for copies of the lilelTionor sent aboit,,
as he understood, to all the MenibtoOd the Home.
Mr. PONSONBY said, it was always painfid to
'him when questions of privilege came to be forced on
the attention of the House ; because he thought the
Howe never gained- any thing by such discussions.
The conduct of the Reverend Gentleman before the
Committee bad been insolent, and even disrespectful.
It therefore appeared to him to be impossible for the
Committee to abs in from making some reference to
the House. He did not know whether the Reverend
Gentleman hid seen his error, and was inclined to
make some apolcigy to the House, but be did not as.
how the question could be got rid of without his be-
ing called op. It therefore appeared that this Geo.
Haman must be called on ; but unless he still shewed'
a determination so persona in insulting the corn-
mktg., he, , fot One should be disposed to psis run
hie conduct mg lightly. It was not for AM Ith
hid written, so much as for his subsettoent coilnet,
that he thought it necessary to havehitbrought up;
for to prevent the Public from understanding the
proceedingkia the House of Commons, would be the
greatest Mow' to the liberties of England that they
bad aver received. He hoped that when called oa
be would express his contrition, and that what bed
passed would then be overlooked.
Mt. CANNING wished to suggest, for the consi-
deration of the House, that they were entering upon
a new course of proceeding.. The Right Honourable
Gentleman had considered this case as if it went to
interrupt the course of justice; but this was totally
erroneous; there was not a shadeat of foundation for
such a suspicion. The cemplant9ires, that he had
censured, in a book, the labour" of a 'Committee of
last year, which Committee no lboger existed.. Gen-
tlemen were therefore totally mistaken in supposing
it a libel on the present Committie, it being a cornal
meet on a Report of last year—(Neer, Asia, hear.)—
and founded on the proceedings of that Cominitteo
It was a comment on a concluded transudes, whisk
was not in pendency at the time the libel was MIRO
and published—(Heer, haw, hear.) Here was she
Report on the table of the House, and this Report
was the substrata on which the comment rested.—
Hoer, then, could this publication be said to arrest
the course of jetties The pamphlet was only a 10111*
idle desultory comment on the general practice of the
House—it was not worthy of its attention; and, in
his opinion, had much better have been passed over.
Sir JOHN NEWPORT said, the question was
whether an iudividdal Committee had been ate
tacked by this Reverend Gentleman? He bad not
abaeliad *single Cu"—,nta but be had said be was
net abed* to Committees at tbs. flows!' Vora.,
dabs) he did not wish to be tried by suclOCenunitp
tees ; did he Pionsted against being tried by lava.'
skims and the Star Chamber. He would say, that
this comma 'went in direct tams to impeach the
authority of the House to inuire into abuses, and to
protest against the pore of the House to appoint
Catkasietem act inquire into any subject that concerned
'the porn interest. He should therefrom protest
:against this important matter being passed over.
• Mr. CANNING explained. The Right Honour-
able Oentleman had quite =kande:stood him, if he
supposed he objected to the Reverend Gentleman
Wag called in.
Mr. BENNETT declared, that throughout this
transectioo no human being.could have had a more
scrupulous regard than hisas4 to prevent all possi.
bility of introducing any
.ell feeling. He had
repelled the evidence in otbasieeee because there might
lotnot he the smallest grouodlor: any of
hal,
He must now repel hOtherges that
censor front his side of the Hama any
inimical
ao the Liberty of the Preis. Goa forbid- that ther
conduct of Members individually, and of the House
half, should not be a subject for free discussion; for
berms 'origin that each discussion was the greatest
illeillemeat that could be to well doing 'and one al
induct. The Committee had no inclination
elimaion wish the Labial, td the Press; but when-
the charge affected the conduct of public Magistrates

it became their duty to tape cote thole& dtseussion
should be conducted in an orderly and discreet man-
ner. The Honolsrable Member then repeated the
circumstances be had detailed on a former occasion,
respecting a copy of the book having been transmit-
ted to him, and,his sending for the author, with the
conversation be bad with him on the subject. He
observed, that he knew nothing of the Reverend
Gentleness, or whether be was of one side or the
other ;,but he must repel those insinuations that ihe
Noble Lord had introduced into the subject, with n
temper not according with his usual suavity of Win-
ner. The Committee had dtbught
.proper to haie
the author summoned before them, in order to ills.'
him an opportunity of explaining away the inn&-
does, and he would repeat that Isis manner wit a
great deal more offensive than the matter of his pam-
phlet. The general opinion was therefore manifested,
that it was not proper for the House to submit to the I,
indignity of his conduct.
Lord CASTLEREAGH, in explanation, said,
he had read every word of the Report in question, '
and had given it his most attentive consideration t—'
but he knew nothing of the author of the pamphlet',
or his opinions ; he did not know that he had ever
heard his name mentioned, till it had been coupled
with the transaction before the House.

Mr. BARCLAY said a few words in reprobation
of the Rev. Gentleman's conduct when before the
Committee, and paid many compliments to the Ho-
nourable Chairman- (Mr. Bennett), for his disinte-
restedness and impartiality.
The Serjeant was then ordered to produce Mr.
Thirlwall at the Bar, when the SPEAK= addressed
him as follows :—.‘Mr. Thirlwall, you have been
ordered to attend at the bar of this House, in conse-
quence of your having avowed yourself the author of
a pdtilication reflecting on one of its Committees.—
The Clerk will read to you the passages complained
of, and then the House will hear what you may be
pleased to offer in your defence."
The Clerk having read the several passages,
The SPEAKER said—., Mr. Thirlwall, the
House will now hear what you have to offer."
Mr. THIRLWALL then addressed the House to the
following effect :—" I. hope that this Honourable
House will do me the justice to believe, that it is
with the deepest concern and regret that I find I
have trespassed on its rights or privileges by any
writings of mina. What I did write, I beg to assose
the House, was net calculated readily to reset the
public eye in the form in which it *as shapiikarrhe
offensive passages occurred in a 'work writtetileeiry
greet:taste, and solely intended to vinditate‘-the
charaetei cif the Magistrates aud tiiy own frail the
obl9qurcast on both by passage 4 di that paietitthe
Report df a Committee of this House, which detailed
the evidence of witnesses necessarily examined before
that Honourable Committee. If, in my ardent wishes
in pursuit of this defensive object, I was unfortu-
nately carried out of the proper path of respect to
this Honourable House, I have to express my regret
for so offending. It is now my anxious wish to ex-
press the regret I sincerely feel for my conduct to-
wards this' Honourable House, and the Honourable
Committee; and, trusting in the clemency of this
Honourable House, 6 vesture to bops and petition,
that its _ sentence, whatever it may be, will not be
spilt as might degrade my character as a Magistrate
'and s Clergyman (Mae, Ater).
The SPEAKER—•"- Mt. Tbirlwall, is there any
thing else that you have to Offer!"
Mr. TIIIRLWALL" No." •
The SPEAKER—" You may withdraw."
Lord CAS'I'LEREAGH said; that though there
could be no doubt that the writings of the Reverend'
Gentleman had amounted to a breach.of privilege,
yet be bored the Howe would be satisfied with the
' apology that they bad heard.
Mr. WYNNE was of opinion that the Reverend
Gentleman bad done every thing that it was in the
power of man to do. He bad expressed Ms contrition
in terms at once manly and respectful ; and ibis. was
all, that could be wished for. lie therefor% !given
that the slightest testimony of displease's 711br.h.11fe
p4se zooid ettee towards him would beast.
Mc. BENNETT then moved, that the
Tbirlwall, for printing and publishing a 1561)16,;fati-
ded 6.6 Vindication,' &c. (reading find
reflecting therein on the proceedings of thetoMmit-
me. had been thereby guilty of a high contempt of
the House, and a breach of its privileges. *
Mr. BROUGHAM wisbed to explain. If this
publication had beep brought before the House with-
out any accompanying statement of the author's con-
duct before the Committee, be should not have con-
.sested to the motion for calling him before the House,
on the ground that though the passages 'might be
offended and improper, he should not deem them, if
taken by themselves, worthy of the cognizance of the
House, if they bad not been followed by the insolent
conduct of the Author before the Committee.

Mr. SHAW LEFEVRE bore testimony to the
upright condom of the' Rev. Gentleman as a Magill.'
trate, and considered he had already made all'the.
atonement in his poWer for the offence be had corn.
=kW& • • •
Sir T. ACLAND elpreesed his entire cohcarrence
in the lenient feeling of revery Gentleman in. the
Hesse, sad also in the manly and respectfol conduct
of the Rev. Gentleman.. Hi must also bear testi-
' wetly to the liberal conduct and ability of. the Hon.
Chairman of the Committee, whose conduct•through-
out had been most conciliatory, and who had done
nothing more on this occasion than what the dignity
of the House rendered necessary.
The question was. then et, that the Rev. J. Thirl.
wall, by the said poblicanon, had reflected on the,
conduct oldie Hoes* itc. which was carried is- the
affirmative. : .
Mr. BENNETT the observed, that tbe.Reverend '
Gentleman not genii In:custody, be was not aware
, btkit 14 poweend wialniret to moving for hintdis-
- • . . ... •
.:(1 • FEARER eilif . that Mr. Tithbtaittsight
kilo
, ~ I - • in again, and acquainted *WOO &solo.
`PO had joss been limeesd, tad be4night then bt
I that U. cotteegsence vilh*Viebie.en. lle-
hi impressed,: ,tha Moosa.was taliWilk Wiltetied "'
farther.% • "*- -..:* cf.'. ' • . 1 .. • .141* "' • • t .•
The question' WA* flits put, and the Solemn *di-
dered to bring bl* isle *bee , . • ' •
The SPEAXER.• thus 'addressed bins :.•fr Mr.
Tbirlsrall, *I em 'commanded by this Roust to ac.
quaint you, that' it has'- taken into consicleraticin the
matter of ciiiiilaint against you, and that the Lit,use

has come to two Resolatices :—lst, That ynu };tie
written and published a work reflecting on the e,,ft,
duct of one of its Committees ; and 2clly, that by
this publication you have been guilty of • high bleach
of the privileges of the House. Bin tam also cnm.
Imanded by them to acquaint you, that in colueqi.,,c.
of the ample acknowledgement you have made,
House is satisfied, and will proceed no farther. y,
may therefore withdral."
WELCH JUDGES.

• Mf; PONSONBY said, he lock this opporttrii:,
to suggest the propriety of patting the Cotnts
Justice in Wales precisely on the-same footing a dip,/
in Englind. This was the proper time to bting
subject before the House, and ne hoped it wnuld di.
wand their attention before the new appointmeati
were filled up; and as no inconvenience coil' oin
by not making these appointments' nil Loa Circuit,
'he hoped the Noble Lord would abstain from mak ng
them till the subject bad been considc.rtd. -
Lorcl CASTLEREAGH intimated, tUt re: ,e
any step could be taken, it would be t;ect:,:sary t.i !.
vise the Prince Regent on the subject of the
menu.

niczwAr r.‘,Bar R I E?.

Mr, GOULBURN gave nf7t;ce 'hat he armlet
on Monday next, move for leave 10 b ;
mg di aBI tot
the more effectually preventiug high% y robt•cres.

t 7311 tote i
on the con,
y, that by
hieh hi each
n also encn,,
mode, •:.e
rther.
npporttni:,
Groats ,:f
ing a • dip,'
0 bting ae
t would di.
ipointmeati
soul oin
•,y.t Circuit,
mak
th.3t ;se:: qe
EsaTy ri !.
he ariol:1:1:.
he armlet
in a for
roirt.erses.
; to a paper
ti, but
eippeir.
I:eturr
, a tii4.•
4.1 ptxkettd
ht rtahy.be
nit
otijea
4.4 ;red •r
om the pals-
te pockets of
be La: LIT
wed b)
loreign:rt.
Noble Lord,
, the '214
of t
tcoasion, re.
and. Bit it
the sputa,
o incon:ide.
out r f t!:;.;
to the /war-
red from its
ted the e,:te!..
of the
tams t.t tt e.
sr of tapirs
to prase, to
Eat a sar:ng
;ht &e:-
n. /le ton-
:ouit of t:.e
England ea
lien Prepfr-
For an At-
ital Stock is
opostiors te-
✓oportiaa to
:HEQUER
LOAM th.a.
names of fo.
icy' of Eag.
gners to Tea
is returns,
: a great deal
ms names,
unnectssarh
egative.
ition, not he.
purpose his
e he belies
ng from the
faired from
tpon the sob-
d the page
tee of the id-
House to un-
rho had pet-
e opinion of
advantagn
Honourtole
to accedeto
re wkhed to
laid, or ore
sent
any paw°,
the eontru7,
alarm in ue
✓ proceejar;
lbjected tc
t tia intaftg;
tit n to Stagy
'6)) aliens lE.,
that the rC".
one-tent: of
e profits
prol:;ibly tat
th.-7 !Ir d:
their capita,
by bomr"
i• II Do'
•
ItaintliVO--
l.
CHEQT-7:5
C^ahling
whit:'
to give el
west ill tl:el
to be fer
woelJ
IQ'
moats, - • .
131 erce7.lo
6, tliq sc.r.
POO.
th'
s Ci