Star.
London, England, 1804-12-04 00:00:00

• L 4W INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OP KING'S BENCH, DEC. r.
AND DIRRITT V. 5. CMe
The Plaintiffs are pawnbrokers in Prince's-ft.ert;
Soho ; the Defendant reticles in Furnival's inn, and
is faid to be a member of the learned profit:Gent• Th.
:titian was brought on a Bill of Exchange of the
amount of zoo). dated the 3oth of June ofthe prefent
year, payable in two months to the Defendant,
was alto the dmthe ac
ceptor
who it appeared that eihe
who it nearly related to a noble and diftinguifbed fa;
oily, about the period when this bill was dated, was
confiderably embarraffed, and was eztrenttly anxioni
to difcharge tome honourable engagements. Being
without money, and without refources in any
palpa-
ble Rate, he applied to Mr. Emden, with whom be
bad formed tome acquaintance on the turf, and with
whom he had likewife had previous tranfadions in
pecantar y matters. It was agreed that the immediate
exigencies of this gentleman flsould be fupplied ; but
as Come oftenfible fecurity was expedient, as an intro-
Bullion into the money market, Mr. Emden drew
to the extent of nearly toool, on the Hon. T.W.Co-
weary, at two months date, for which the Defendant
Was to receive the confideration of tol.• in each hun-
dred, or at the rate of 6o per cent. per annum. One
of the bills originating in this negotiation Was the
!abject of the prefent anion ; and in the coerce of the
trial, a fcene of infamy was exhibited, equally eaten-
fated, we hope, to awaken the caution srf the ynnng
and the ditlipated, and to excite the terror of the de-
figniag and profligate.
Mr. Galilean, in opening this cafe, contented him•
(elf merely with delivering up the Kill to be read,
becaufe the hand-writing of the drawer, indorfer, and
acceptor, were admitted, and alto the non-payment 1
and regular notice to the former. It appeared, wheu 1,
tread by the. Clerk of the Court, to be a bill in the
form we have defcrihed, and was made payable at
Meffrs. Childs, the bankers of the acceptor.
Mr. Easels: s, for the Defendant, Rated, as the deft
ground of nbjedion to this claim, that the full value
was not given for the bill by the Plaintiffs, it being m
ufurious tranfadion, and therefore they were not es-
titled to recover. The ufnry committed was nht di-
re& they were too learned in the fcience of money-
getting', to throw themfelves completely open to de-
adline under the Blittute of Ufury, and intermediate
agents were engaged as an additional means of elud-
ing this faints, y Statute. The acceptor employed
the prefent Defendant, Mr. Emden again had his
fub-agent, who picketed the bill to be difcountedity.
the Plaintiffs. The name of this palm was Stephen-
Fon : he offered the bill, for the purpofe Rated, to
Mars. Parker and Burkitt, and was perfeftly aware
of their mode of doing bufinefs. " Two hundred
pounds was a large tom—they might advance a por-
tion of the money, but the deficiency in cafh would
be eafily fuppiied goOds." The plaintiffs thee
advanced 11501. taking not a (billing more than the
regular interest of 5 per cent. But the trial Wdt here:
for the remaining 4cl. they gave a watch and Come
jewellery, eflimated at double its value, fo that
they acquired act in the tranfallion by hiss delbnce
evafinn,
beyond the legal interea. In fupport of ti
be called his canto merit fub agent, Mr. Stephenfons
who unfortunately had 101 l all recolleCtion o any
part of the tranradion. Mr. Glees, however,f who
examined him, was enabled to retie& his memor
hisy
three Cenral times, by letters anti accounts in
own ban.? writing. When there were handed tohim,
be believed they were written by him, but not until
after a long and minute examination, with the affif-
tance of alarge optical glafs, which he alternately
applied to his eye, and to the furface of the paper.—
MI the ability of the Learned Counfel, fupported by
there permanent documents, could not mead aeon-
facto from this witnefs of the reference of there pa-
pers to the identical bill, for which this :talon was
brought.
Being anted what the watch wee valued at, he laid
81. Being interrooated again, what it obtained he
Paid eight gunsees:bet it res/ht be fold math beneath
its worth yet in the fespel :t turned out that he was
the porehafer. A Lady of talk and fathion, who re-
faded with the defendaat, wilted for a (mall diamond,
as a trifling ornament to force part of her drefs, and
to gratify this little fancy, he had prefented her with
• a brilliant in exchange for; he watc
this whimthe
fair female, he had the compenfation of 51. in the
form of commiflion, or equal to treble the legal in-
tend, for executing this reputable negotiation with
the Plaintiffs.
Lord Ext.ISSOROUOHO••-" I think the Collate' for
the defendant has not eflablifhed„ by fuflicieut tehi-
many, that the plaintiff's fold the gnods confiderahly
under their •altse ; and 'inlet's an evident taring
and g
fraud to elude the Ratute be expofed, the plaintiffs
may be entitled to recover."
Mr. ER51t1,15..--" If that he your Lorclfhip's npi•
pion, I will prove the bill to be ufurious in its in igi-
nal concoftion." He then called
The Hon. T. \V. Coventry, and preparatory to his
admiffion as a witnefs, a releafe was given him by
the defendant.
Q, Did you give this bill to the defendant ?—I
gave it to him with others, to the amount of nearly
a theufand panne's, accepted in the lime foto).
q, What was your intention in delivering to him
these acceptances?—A. To obtain money to pay
fame argent demands.
ozyniat cnoirnfaii.in were you to make
ol t
for
o the
defendant fiir afirlance ?—A. gave .
every hundred he accoinmo..lated me with on the
bills. to ni
Q. What time have they t' ?—A. Two
ono 5.
Q., Was this agreement made in the fame room,
mist the tame time, whets the bills were prepared ?
A• Yes, and I gat e she dclendant the hills to get
in any way he pleated.
clifcounted t.,r his own heneflt,
Q., y o u ?—A. Ite paid the whole
How did he ra T
un every tool. which he de-
money. excepting p
eluded.

Creft-Erawiseti.ri ky Mr. GARROW.
Q, I prciume, Sir, this was name the firs boatiefs
Ton nad with the deittrlint ?—A. It was not.
Q„ Perhaps this was .6 turf tranfaCion :—A. It
was not.
I Cuppore, Sir, Too have had turf nerciations
with this Gentleman hut thofe are honourable en-
cvements, in which this moon-thine does not appear I
ihEy are to be paid iu hard cath ?—A. Yes, they arc,
Sir.

Mr, 006‘10W 4 the Yiry.—oa The debts incurred
on toe turf are to bie'anfwered on the fpot, will) the
molt rigid punituality, while tradefmen, who peter
a man of (Anon in the ghnfily chataiter of duns, ate
to be fent away as empty as they came."
Q` Having honourable blood in your veins. I am
floe, Sir, you would have thought it infamous not to
intend to pay this bill?—A. I fhould.
Q, Were you at large, Sir, when tbefe bills were
presented to you ?—A. I was. . .
Q. Were you prefent when they were drawn?—
A. T was with the defendant at the time.
Q.:. I fuppofe he had not the coin ready, that was
to be attrafted by the magnet of this paper ?—A. I
do not know ezaftly when he produced the money.
Q Then, when be paid the money, you fettled his
remuneration of ten per cent ?—A. This was agreed
on at the time of making the bill.
Q:... Did he tell you at the fame time, that this
agreement would convert thefe efficient bills into
wane paper ?—A. He Paid nothing to that dice..
Mr. &skim s.--.. After this tettimony, I can have
no motive to re-examine Mr. Coventry to a tingle
particular." •
Mr. GARROW commented at great length on the
evidence ; be fani, in the cafe of Lamb and Size
land (a cafe we have laid before our readers), be
had spoken in the fpirit of prophecy, that Would
that infamous attempt fuccecd, the eztenfive cit.
culation of paper, fit beneficial in a great comener-
eial country, would be cut up. root and branch, by
the detefiable arts of the molt profligate of the hu-
man fpeeies. The anfwer to this obfervation was,
that his Lrrdlliip did not lit there in the dignified
chevalier he fuftained of an hereditary legiflator, but
in the office, neither lets importantnor honourable, of
an expounder of the law. In his review of the pre-
fent cafe, be remarked on the delay occafioned by
the confinement of an honourable witnefs, whole
errors excited grief, and whole misfortunes extorted
compaffion. He (aid. the Plaintiffs were perfectly
exonerated from the charge of nfory,which had been
attempted to fopported again' them ; the whole
lof this part of the caufe, therefore, depended upon
Ibis Lordlhip's direction on a point of law. If when
the bills were drawn, they were put into the hands
of the Defendant without any oft:lions ftipulation ;
if from thence they were delivered over to the Plain-
tiffs, upon the day of their acceptance, before any
ufurious intercourfe, then the bills were not tainted,
and his clients were entitled to recover. He admit
ted, that if an infamous money broker fhould coin
bills with Come thoughtkfi profligate, making an du•
riot's contrail to the extent of a million of money,
at the moment of their formation at the mint, al-
, though it fhould lower thehonours of this great trod-
-1 ing metropolis, and fend our merchantsinto beggary,
las the law now ftuod, thole traitorous coiner. wool.
lhe exonerated from the payment of one fulling of
i the amount, and would rear their fronts among the
princes of the earth. Mr. Garrow laid, it was a
queflion of fait for the Jury to determine, whether,
at the moment the bills were prepared. the ofury was
perpetrated? and this would depend on the credit
they attached to the evidence of Mr. Coventry. to
whom he would attribute no defign to mifreprefent.
In this enquiry the Jury would recollea. that it was
not his firft tra nfailion vi i.h the Defendant; that his
demands were tugent, 2111 that it was extremely ins-1
'probable, under dick: i is cumftances, he &mild at the l
time of the formation of the bills ftipulate for the
tender mercies of the Ufurer. The Learbed the
faid, (111 the prefent occafion, however, b* the au- I
don ufea in the pleadings, his right to a verditt was
lefleblilhvi on the counts of the declaration. What-
lever might be the fate of this bill, for the goods deli-
veld, the Plaintiffs were entitled to recover.
A long altercation here took place between th
his
e
Counfel, which was afterwards renewed, while
Lordfhip was fumming up the evidence to the Jury.
After a dillinit and prottailed flatement an thatelli.
mony in this easag, MAIM tile law of the boas i.
applicable to it. the Jury
foond a verde& fur the
Plaintiffs to the extent of the goods delivered. aol.

CRIM. CON.
°amuse 3.
GIOIVIC CM MAIMS, VIM,. I. CAULCIILO,
The Plaintiff is the fon of the late Sir William
Chambers, areltiteo to the King, has a commiffion
in his Majefly'a fervice, and was employed in the ex.
pedition to Holland. The Defendant was alto a
Catain in the rmy, is well known in the circles of
gaiety and fafiliaon, and as an amateur of the dra-
matic art.
The Plaintiff married one of the daughters of Ad-
miral I.erd Rodney, in the autumn of the year 1784.
It was a match of the purell feniibility and affetlion,
formed between two young perfons, the one eighteen
and the other feventeen, and confummated after a
rapid expedition to Gretna Green. On their return
from this northern flight, the union received the fanc-
tiun of the parents on both fides, and this happy cou-
ple sere bored according to the holy rites of the
Church of England, when Sir
The William Chhisambe mar
rs
was prefent at the ceremony. iffne of t
siege extended to none beautiful children ; eight of
them were boys. For a long fueceffion of years, this
early parti.,lity teemed to be confirmed and flrength-
ened. Such was theoyful lituation of thefe parties,
until a Mort time before they met the prefent De-
fendant at a ball at Huntingdon, in the neighbour-
hood of which town the Plaintiff refided. The fob-
request faits will be more fatisfaatifily Ci Haled
from th particulars of the trial, than from any de-
tail wee could give from our knowledge of the cir-

comflances.
Mars. Ea seta ir, Gaartow, and S , were
COUltra for the Multi" ; Meffrs. Da+ias, Glass,
an Buaaotron, Inc the Defendant.
Mr. Easaims, on the part of the former, diklofed
the f.tls of the eafe. Ile raid, this was an aBion
lacking a compenf.itifm, in dimity+. for the criminal
intercourfe of the Defendant with the wife of the
Plaintiff. The Lady was ezquifitely beautiful, per-
feCly accompliflicd, of molt fafcinating twitters ;
and notwithtlanding the numerous progeny which
the had given, to become the
me ornament of fociety,flie
retained all the appearance Vernal lovelinefs. The
Defendant is a man pokeffed of an elegant palm. of
a fiTahed *dikes, and endowed with thofe talent.
and powers which Soda vigilant and infidioos advo-
cate in the female bofom. He faw, and he admired
this lady at a dance given in the principal town of
the county where fbe retied. mon melancholy it
was that tbefe fentiments were not confined to bint.

felt (he alto law, felt, and admired. and from that
moment the felicity of her /inland wasfor ever de
(frayed. The Plaintiff immediately obferved a 'Cud-
den change in her manners; on every little donsellic
difpute, the threatened to leave her hufbancl, and
the fond circle in which Ilse had. appeared ; and fu•
tare events could alone explain to the aided hut
band this grievous revalntioa. During this miferable
interval. the Plaintiff difeovered a letter in her hand:
urged by jealonfy, he attempted to feize it ; in con-
fequence of this fcuffie, the deferted the mention pf
her bufband and her children ; but at, this • time
he bad attained no knowl4ge of her criminality.—
Soon after this fracas, he was. in his ofienfible cha-
ndler in the fervice, called upon to embark to join in
the attack on Holland. It to happened, that the in-
difpofition of this officer did not admit of his remain-
ing in that humid climate, he therefore unexpected-
ly returned to his houfe at Hartford, near Hunting.
don, where his wife then was. .She appeared, on
his 'arrival, extremely, agitated, and the next morn-
ing left the place, abandoning an infant, of only (even
months old, wholly unprotetted.
Mrs. Cotine, the filler of the Plaintiff, depofed to
the marriage of Mr. and Mrs. Chambers, on the r ath
of September, t 784.
The Rev, John Walker gave teßitiony to the har-
mony and affeaion that
,prevailed in the family, in
which he abed in the capacity of tutor. .4
Mrs Little was in the fituation of honfe-Veeper,
and had alto the fopetintendance of .the children.—
She firß eibl'erved a 'change in the deportment. of
Mrs. Chambers in the year 1798, anck (he had Come
time before obferved a difpofition to ffiat with feve-
ral Gentlemen ; but fhe noticed nothing very re-
markable until iSot, when Captain Caulfield had a
lodging at Huntingdon, and was a frequent valtor
to her mailer and mittrefs. Being interrogated if
(he noticed any thing peculiarly familiar in the beha-
viour of Captain Caulfield and Mrs. Chambers, the
laid they were accnilomed to fit on a fnpha together
io the abfence of her hatband. After the departure
of the Plaintiff for the Helder, the Captain was re-
ceived on a footing of much nearer intimacy ; he
was accuftomed to be in the tannic late in the even-
ing, and early in the morning, and none of the fer-
Tants knew when he went or when be returned, fo
that fufpicions were entertained that he was an in-
mate all night in the family. The men-fervants were
ufually fent to bed at this period at an early hour.—
Mrs. Chambers had alto altered her plan in one par-
ticular; it was ufual with her to admit the children
into her room, as Coon as they role, with the wit-
nefs. who attended them, but during the whole of
this interval, they were excluded, and both the doors
of her apartment were locked.
Mary Smith remained in the fervice of the Lady
two years, from about Chrißmas, Mar, to the fame
Wirral in tiloa. Her minters then lived at Farn-
ham St. Martin's, near Bury, St. Edmund's. She
thought Capt the aulfield was thetia lodger with her.
From thenceemoved to Prince's-ltreet, Hann-
ver-fquare : thence to Fulham; afterwards to Mint-
Patin. near Reigate h and again to Batteries; and
in all thefe fituations the Defendant attended her,
and feemed to continue a lodger, and an acquain-
tance in her family. end no illicit intercourfe was
deteaed. Afterwards they went to Chertfey, nd
there likewife they had two feparate beds and apaart.
menu; but from her experience in her office of
chamber-maid, what, ft om their previnus conduit,
and the proximity of the rooms. (he flrongly furpea-
ed that both beds were regularly made, and con-
Randy difordered ; and from other more minute cir-
enmllances, which it is neither delicate nor neceffary
to explain. the had no doubt that the Defendant had
criminal interconrie with her mitlrefs.
Mr. DALLA3, for the Defendant, admitted, that if
the cafe were proved, his client had alienated the at
feai.,ns of this lovely feraph, retaining all the charms,
wawa, at this hour, of virgin beauty, no damages
could be too, !trim's, and no compenfation could be
adequate to the injury filleted by the Plaintiff. How-
ever, the claim of Mr. Chambers in a Court of Law
mull depend upon the merit of his pretenfions. The
Learned Connie), after the evidence thaw had been
UR adduced, would not, and could not, pretend that
the adultery had not been proved; but whether the
Plaintiff had any
.011 demand for damages mutt de-
pend nn the fans by which the defence would be fup-
ported. It was fingulat, that. though Mrs. Cotine,
the filler of the Plaintiff, was brought hrward as a
witnefs, not a tingle quedion was propofed to her by
his Learned Friend, on the harmony foblilling be
tween the Plaintiff and hi. wife, although it might be
thought, from his repiefentation, that this conjugal
union was a fort of matrimonial elyfium, which
could alone be excteded by the joys of Paradife.—
The happiness of this pair was to be proved by the
uniupported evidence of a fingk clorneltic, E. Little,
whole depofitions in feveral Tell:nits were abfurd and
contradiaory. The lon of Sir William Chambers,
and the daughter of my Lord Rodney muR panel's a
regular end habitual intercourfe with thole who held
a diainguiflied rank in the fa fisionable world, ant yet
not one of their affociates had been prothiced to give
te itimony to thole mutual ervieat mints which appear-
ed nely in the brief of his opponent. He Ibould
make it appear, why thi. fort of evidence could not
be fopplied ; be would produce to the Jury a relies
of letters; he would produce a deed, fanttioned by
all the formalities of tile I iw, which would expecte a
fy Rem of brutality in the conduit of the Plaintiff;—
after which he could be ',nutted to no damages ; and
it would equally excite the anonifhment and the coin-
pailion of the Court, or perhaps its contempt, that
he should have prefonted to claim of the Office of his
country what virtue and humanity alone have a right
to require. Mr. Dallas then produced the letters to
which he adverted. The hrtt was dated in Marini,
in which the Plaintiff aCeiited to a awaiting ; (peaks
of the terms on which it ie to be effeeed, and in-
treats her not to take one of the carriages with her.
as it would cxpofe him to an affeliment of aol.a year.
rhe next was dated the ad of June. wherein he im.
Owes pardon for his pall salifconduet, intreats an
onion, and lays he null be ever grateful if Ike will
not refute his sopa. On the third letter, which is
dated four days polletior, he befeeehes her to be re-
conciled to him, if net on his Account. at teat from
her attachment to her children, from her refpra for
her own dignity. and from every motive of policy
and expedience. He was now going abrnad on a
public and dangerwas duty t in hie abfence hetbould be
per rally compoled and refired to every peril in the
Cavern of his coontry,if the wouldrellore to him peace,

. .
. . • • ..
~. . .
by extending her forgivenethi thane dilare
threat which be had attend is an of
~.., •
'he adds, " With to rd to. the piitoli, :I,
yon the mailed injury, and what I entered has. w)-
der the momentary intiiience of harry and
iatosica-
tion." • The Learned Counfel than proceeded m a
deed of reconciliation, to which ,lohl and Jaaaci"ml
bees, George Lord Rodney. John Rodney.and lin
Mill:Atilt...FAT*. were parties... He (aid. that in this
deed there was ap abfolute covenant,. that in cafeif
difference*, The Mould. be, admitted M Apemtt:tgis
time her Awn diferetion thould direal that .4001. in
drefs and furoiture Thopld be,allowed.ber, with an
annuity of two hondred pounds.... She wallthewlik to
have the two :oat:gen. clUlthen Moil they WeMeiglit
years old, under her care, and permilion le fee. the •
other children at the hoof: of the Plaintiff whenever
her maternal 'Wilms fliould be fo difpofed, 'rhit
whole tenor of the defence wesdireaed to thew the
Plaintiff, by his own grofr conduel, had alienated the
alio:lions bf his wife ; that the h.td,obtained teems of
feparation with his own coneirrence, ,in cosh-
quence of his brutality ; and that thertifore, for any
aft of . infidelity, however fueedsfully three. he
cpeld, maintain no aftion for damages in a Court of
fate. deed I
•
_ e and the letters having been waif by
Mt. Bootle, they were read according to the Order
of their dates, by the Clerk of the Court, by Which
it appeared that the Plaintiff expreffedthe moll rig.
neat contrition for his own errors, and not a fyilaa
bit of dee fasallell , dikontent arifing from any past
of the deportment of Mrs. Chambers.
Mr. Es-sues then rote in reply, with Rrong marks
Of indignation. The moil infamous reports had befit
circulated by this Defendant' iti order to deter the
Plaintiff from Peeking the retiree to which he wit
entitled at the Bar of his eonntry. By the Mame-
tioa with which his Learned Friend was fu he
was now made acquainted with the corrupt fountain
from which they iffued. This profligate adelteret,
repofing in the arms of thie beautiful andatatortunati
woman, had prollituted the confidence• to which he .
was admiued, had ranfacked the papers in her poker-
fion, in Order to convert the proofs. of the ardent af-
feaions of her hutband. into inftroments of deßrue-
tion • i the man over whom he triumphed, This, ow
a thoufand oceafions, he had called the adulterer's
cootie; if it were thasetintes the 4ace of fscoefa. is
was always the path of infamy. It was objease‘ that
not a tingle queltion was propofed on his fide to Mrs.
Cosine, in evidence of the matrimonial hfppinefs thee
Plaintiff fo long enjoyed. The Lady came into Court
under the molt dittreffing perplexity; and it was not
the wiQs of the Counfel for the Plaintiff to rotate
her anxiety ; yet no Inch iasprelions km° to base
ezifted in the brealt of his Learned Opposent. and be
might have lifted the truth ilia had doubted the faa
of this mutual felicity; but he knew the experialtent
would injure the eaufe of his client. and shooflies
he deified from this inquifitioo. It was carom..
dinary that he &mild complain of the deficient is.
duftry of the Contitel for the Plaintiff in this par-
ticular. when in another inflanee immediately eon-
netted with it, he bad at lea% been equally (pan•
ing ef his exertions. Mr. Chambers, the fon of that
.Architee, fo lung patronized by his Sovereign. and
who has rendered Masten' iTAIDOIIig by the mastith-
cent monuments of his genies : Ms wife. t
a:X
he
L ter of an mutinous and Oast. lliebletaam.
1 beays@aeftreomtiftildfi,enathe,eidtjalyaiteo.:aonuc:onladalntbearettsad
hrtecanicaondnociii:::weorarcenkforietnowilicenw:iyredlitt:Wierefetralifi.n.
then Mr. Chambers had been guilty •of any maims-
duet ; if he had frequented gaming booths and MO?
diets; if be had praftifed the vie and. the vices of
I the fpendthrifi and the debauches, abundant teal.
' moray would have been afforded, of which his leer*-
ed Friend might have *railed hinsfelf, in order to
thew that the profligacy of the Plaintiff rendered him
unworthy of the ateflion of his accomplifhed wife.
But not a tittle of evidence had been adduced, not.
, arid:Rending all the advantages with which the
Counfcl were fupplied ; they had contented them-
, (elves with allufions made by the Plaintiff. in the no•
ble and generous fpirit of repentance, which itfelf
argued he was incapable of the offences with which
he was charged. A ['aerobic about a contemptible
" flip of paper had been adverted to, mid a Rory
I about an unloaded pined was blazoned of
to far
11 port the feeble narrative. Sappiice. is the
of inebriety, either from the died' of will1411841:111;
the more deadly poifon of jealolifyi he bad dose
what had been reprefented ' • and was the, floe pie-
tore drawn by the midierly hand of the folditne ar-
tilt of our country to be forgotten ? and were the
human patens never to be refpelted ? Litters to the
_voice of the noble Moor; ia the exceth of his parson
he exclaims—
Oh monftroes! f wit tear her Herb !mi. hv.b" •
Then driven altersataly by hope and fear— .
1 Dv tie world,—.—•--.
I Web ay wire is bale& sad think the Is no:
Ukiah that shoe set Jett, and think shoo set aa :
rabies few; pciuL My name, flaw au -. free
A. Dimes vgago.ls now bogrirtid and black •
As muse own face. If there be cords or knives.
Pair" or rimer felbeedge Chreems.
I'll net endure D. Would I were ratishoV
Stich were the feelings of a great sail genre:ooo
mind under the dominion of this tormenting patient
This demon had been driven from Hell to transfer
its fires iotn the breaft of this viEtim. A lady of
noble alliance is condoeted from tows to town. and
espofed in a Rate of roftitutios to the ridicule ..of -..
fools, to the compalion of the wife. and to the coo-
tempt of all. A foldier returning from the field of
battle to the embraces of tilt objeft of his early arse- •
Cloth is rejeaed with difdain ; be is derived of that
society which bad converted the days of trouble into
a (taros of uninterrupted felicity, and for the loth be
has (attained, he claims reparation from the boner
and the jutlice of his country.
When Lord Etats sos.ov a a was about totes up
the evidence, one of the Jurors &fired to Kopek a
queflion to the bookkeeper. Mrs. Little being cell'
ed, he enquired if. before the istiesecy of the De.
feudant with her insets, the obferved eel thing its-
confitient with mii:ii.ll love and harmony to fubfi*
b • ...( -:n the Plaintiff and his wife ? The reply woes
that flow had noticed nothing of the kind, szeeptieg
the difpu:: regarding the letter. •
'
Lord ELLSISCHLOVON (to the Jery).—" After
this brilliant difplay of talent and eloquence• it be.
comes es to withdraw mirthless from the iallimece
of the patron's, mod to inquire into the bias. as (o-
ber and redouble man. It keens to toe, the Geo.
Erardeasy.
/
/ •
..,

,
IN
•
'
~
I
, - . .
? , , '
,
o..i*
'
-,2
*;i--
i ,
i 0
.4
"I:
.
I
,
:
s
V
t .
V'
e
.1,
1:.,,
4
‘
, )
'.
- $
1 -.
II ,
: t,
6?•
If
e- G •
) ?
I. ' ,
of , •
11-
to
A
6.
et-
A
A-
no-
ref!'
idt
WO
orT
4p-
kept
ram
lose
—L.—