Star.
London, England, 1826-04-07 00:00:00

FOR GOUT, RHEUMATISM, NERVOUS COM.
PLAINTS, &c. &c.

OXLEY'S CONCENTRATED ESSENCE of JA-
MAICA GINGER. This useful Medicine is recommended
by several eminent Medical Men, and is in constant use with many
Persons of the highest rank and respectability. It relieves and
4hertena she duration of Fits of the Gout, confining them to the
extremities, and mitigating the paroxysms I in Nervous Cons•
plaints it warms and invigorates the Stomach, removes Flatulency,
mails Digestion, and thereby strengthens the whole system.
Prepared from the Original Recipe of Samuel Oxley, bee Ma-
jesty's Chemist, by his Widow, Mrs. S. Oxley. Pontefract, York-
shire; and sold by the principal Medicine Yinden in Town and
Country, in bottles at 10s. 6d. 4s. 6d. and 21. 9d. each.

General GASCOYNE moved thir third reading of
the Liverpool and Manchester Bail-road Bill. He
would, however, make a few preliminary observations;
the original Bill had been lost in the Committee, but
his constituents had again brought it forward with se-
veral alterations. Ile took this opportunity of stating
that fact because he saw a great muster of the Hon.
Gentlemen whom he knew to be hostile la the Bill.
I His constituents had obviated as much as .p•issible
.any inconvenience that, might
.accrue 'to
For this purpose, when the road had been originally
planned to cross streets.and and other thoroughfares, it
had been so constructed that it would pass under them.
He was convinced that those Hon. Gentlemen knew the expense
attendant upon such excavations. The question was whether it
was beneficial to the public, and he felt convinced that it would be
proved to have that tendency. There were many Hon Gentlemen
who would say that the canals in that quarter were quite sufficient
for the transit between Liverpool and other parts of the country,
he, for one, was not of that opinion.
Mr. W. PEEL supported the Biil. for he felt con-
vinced that it would greatly benefit the commerce of
Liverpool. It had been stated in the C immittee, that •
since the year 1760. the trade of Liverpool had increased
in a very great degree, and he trusted that it would go
on increasing in the same ratio, to make up in some
measure for the distress experienced b the late shock
in the commercial world. There were many Gentlemen who op-
posed the BiU, because they had been frightened out art their wits
by the Canal Shareholders, who told them that their parks and
grounds would be invaded by it ; nay, he had heard of une Gentle-
man who wis afraid of the railroad, because it would go through
his dining.rtiont—(A laugh). The preamble had been carried by a
majority of 43 to la iu the Committee so the MIL
Mr. S fANLEY opposed the 8,11, on the ground that
it was extremely mischievous in its effects. He stated
the or iginal projectors of the scheme had almost entirely'
failed in their object. It was at first proposed that
goods were to be conveyed by steam, at the rate of
eight or ten miles per hour, but now it turned out that
three miles per hour was.the greatest speed .o be used,
and that was to be done after all by means of that useful
animal, the horse. He eeprecated rail roads, as an ar-
bitrary and unnecessary interference on private pro-
petty; and mentioned several esp.,' in which the prac-
ticability of rail roads was doubtful. He was convinced
from a return of rates which he had seen, they could
not carry goods cheaper than could be done by the
common mode of conveyance—canals. The tonnage
charged in the canal was consderably under the scale
to be charged in tail roads. Manine was c • rri d free
by the canal, whereas 3.. 6d. was levied on it by the rail road. It
was-therefore evident that if the rail road did not carry goods
cheaper or richer than the canals, the latter ought to have the pre-
ference. 1 he shares of the Hail Road Company had been selling
at 47 premium, whereas they were now at a discount. Under all
the circumstances, he therefore did not see any case sufficiently
strong to wartant the passing of the Bill, and h kuu Id therefore
move that it be read a third time that day six months.
Sir I. COFFIN opposed the Bill, and observed that
no Member would like to have his property invaded in
the manner in which many pet soas would be, in the
progress of this undertaking. He particularly mentioned the ease
of a pear grown, wbose.unly hopes of remuneration for the de-
struction of a small piece of ground which she held was in the pre-
miss of her invaders.
Mr. HUSKISSON supported the motion It had
been urged that the present Bill was an arbitrary inter-
ference with private property, but that was a plea
always set up whenever Parliament was called upon to
alter or make a public highway. In his opinion a very
good case had been mide out, and the Bitl promised a
very great increase to the conveniences of commerce.
The canal had made most enormous profits, and it was
high time that such profits should he diminished. The
only condition upon which he had origmally supported
the present Bill was, that the Directors should limit the
profits of 10 per cent. If the canal owners would do
this, be should nut hesitate to withdraw his support to the measure.
The canals were making from 100 to 130 per cont. profits on the
freight and tonnage of their goods. He disclaimed all interest 1s
railroads, and raitousd sumpaniste, and came purely upon public
grounds to give bis support to the Bill, whirls he considered of great

atility to the public, by means of the convenience it would afford
to the commercial parts of the country.
Mr. PHILLIPS thought that rail-roads would bring with them
more Injurious effects than any contemplated benefits. Ile sisoulsk
certainly vote against the motion.
Sir J. NEW PORT supported the motion, on the ground that
competition prevented monopoly. The rail-road had already had
the effect of lowering the rate of charges on the canal. -
After some observations frum Captain BRA/KHAN, the House
divided—For the third reading 88—for the amendment 41. Ma-
- ":jiiiitiliTTaitiur.of the original motion 4?. The Bill was then read
a -third thtie and passed.
A Message came from the Lords, to the effect that their Lord-
ships had agreed 'to the Small Tythet Recovery Bill.
On bringing up tjse Report of the Basingstoke Canal Bill,
Mr. G. BA N KES opposed its being receiv:d, and contended that
this was a very hard case of encroachment upon private property,
which no plea of public advantage could justify.
Mr. BRIGHT gave his support to the Bill.
Mr. MABERLY ()Prised the Bill.
Mr. Alderman WOOD moved as an amendment, that the Report
be dismissed.
Mr. T. W ILSON supported the motion of Mr. Alderman Wows.
Sir T. LE al BRIDGE contended for the neces-ity
of the Basingstoke Canal, in order to facilitate the
eornruerciai intercourse of the counties through which
• it would pass—and also between Bristol and London—
arid between Ireland and this- country. The local inconveniencics
were, comparatively speaking, of a trifling nature. He opposed
the amendment.
Sir 11. J. Al I LON' A Y declared the proposed measure would
be a gross outrage on the sacred right of property.
Aldetman THOMPSON supported the amend-
. ment, on the principle that 'besides the uselessness of
. the project, and its being a nuisance to the landed Gen-
try of the intended line of canal, it would he a gross
injwtice to those who vested their money (150,0000
in the Thames Navigation Canal. The City of Landon,
as trustees of those lenders of money. felt it to be their imperative
duty- to oppose the measure, on the ground of its injustice to those
who lent them their money, and-of its being of no public utility.
The House then divided on the amendment—For it 49—Against
it 3s. The measure was, therefore, lost.

BISHOPRIC= OP DURHAM.
Mr. Secretary PEEL addressed the House for the
purpose of obtaining permissi n to bring in immedi-
ately a Bill to remedy certain inconveniences in the
administration of Justice, arising out of the demise of
the S-e of Du. ham, and preventing the recurrence of
the same in future. On the occasion of the demise of
the Bi.lsop of Durham, it appeared to be the law now,'
, that the ministerial officers of Justice in the County
Palatine of Durham, were ips• facto put out of office.
Insomuch so, that at the present moment there wac no
• Sheriff. no Jury could be sworn, and no Quarter Ses-
sions held. This was so great an interruption to the
public business of the county and the administration of
justice, that it was his intention to introduce this evening
a Bill to place in these respects the County of Durham
on the same footing as other Counties of England, co
that such Officers sh .11 be entitled to hold their situa-
tions for a certain period. He was nut prepared to say
that the present Administration of the County should
remain untouched, or in its present state. On the con-
vary, he only thought it fitting that the Gentlemen of
this county should, as in other counties, perform those
ministerial offices themselves, instead of allowing them
to be filled by persons not equally eligible. He should,
perhaps, shortly submit to the House some remedial and general
Pleasure with reference to these appointments ; and one of its prin-
cipal features would consist of a regulation, that the Judges should
select three names, which they should report to the Bishop as fit
persons to fill the office of Sheriff, from wboai the Bishop should
select one to fill that office.
In answer to an observation from Mr. Nicootas Catimae,
Au, *votary PEEL, said he did tuat anticipate any difficulty in
the atrangement, as it affected the interests of the individuals hi.
therto eligible—as the office was not one of emolument.
After a few words from Mr. &Lice,
• Mr..HUtIE said it was high time the whole system of the ad-
ministration of the County and Bishopric's of Durban should be
revised and remodelled. It was a disgrace to the Established Church
that thisßishoprkli should possess such enormously disproportioned
funds as it now possessed, where there was no rational ground for
such an unjust piefervrice.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER having intimated
to the House that it was necessary for the public convenience that
the lac 11 should come into immediate operation, and that be there-
fore hoped the House would not object to the Bill going through
all it. singes that. evening, the Bill was read a first and second time,
committed, and ordered to be read a third time, if engrossed, the
same night.
11A GARY OP TRW riti4IDRNT Olt Tint BOARD OF TRAM
flu the 'notion of rise CH6NCELLOR of the EXCHE-
QUER, the House resolved iu& into a Committee of the whole
house, on the Civil Li.t Act,
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER rose,
pursuant to notice, to move a Resolution relative to the
situation of the President of the Board of Trade. It
would belt). their recollect.on, that the subject had oc-
. opted ,the attention of the Howe in the course of last
, Session, fnd there was then a general feeling, that as
. this,was 0.. e of the most important offices under the
, crown, it ought to be put upon a competent footing in
• .94 other respects. Prior to 1780, the affairs of com
nierce, both foreign and colonial, were conducted by
Commissioners %ids an ample establishment, known by
the title of a Board of Trade. It was thought about
'that time that this establishment was too complicated,
'that' the offices were too numerous, the salaries too great,

pecdt.he dtitisi top insignificant for the salaries. Ac-
i sorthogli it sniferid,' not exactly a natural, but rather
a' violent, death, which was accelerated by the lash of
' Mr. Burke's-ridicule. Where abolished, it was thought
might very easily be sustained by other
/0;f1F,Oi: Administration. It was soon found, however,
impossible to do without some coutsclling power im-
mediately issuing -from the Crown to superintend the,
4iteusive interests of a commerce so large as that of
great tnuniry, aid the business was left to the
geoetal management of a Coirontitee selected from
the Members of the Privy Council as early as 1784.
As the offices and salaries of the 11.1ard of Trade had
been Wholly abolished, it was found necessary to provide
an adequate recompense for the President and Vice
/K4:sld/int, by connecting them with other r ffices of less
duty stud of competent emolunient. The House would
-not deny 'the right of sufficient remuneration to any man
:who devoted his talents to the public service. But it
most be obvious that this mode of paying for the ful-
filment of the duties of a highly useful and effective
office by the salary of one which was well paid, though
less tffectise, was sulject to the gre nest possible objec-
tion. Parliament had acquiesced in this proposition,
in far as to appoint a pioper salary for the Vice Pr si-
4.tpt,*.hfch h4.ppend vtlfen he himself held the office
me yeaipgo. kit ttooght that a fit remuneration
.for the Prnsialent• would be 5,0001. a year. The House
would recolkeethat it was an office which, in these
times esnrcially,
.01)0 for more Lebow., both rf body
*rid mina, than Arry'nther now in existence. He had
honour to fill it once, and he could speak to the fact,
•,. tit. at no situation of which he had any knowledge re.
,drir'd 'I! absohite l aeirotir n of the whole mad to the
tlp4eq PI the. oiSc4 I to could not iasi on to $l4 mceitir
without iodelgiNtiiiineeW with a word or two on tht
iir;:bent finider 'el ifs 'irk woulu be very had ':rte in him,
:tpetiter hod! huh"-fi.)en panegytic on his -Right
Irn. Vi or'teexpltnite too largely on the manner'

'in which he had fulfilled the dirties alit. No man had
ever displayed more zeal and assiduity in it—none had
brought a more comp.rehpnsimmind, nor a Aleaser ia-
tellect, into the prop& butineki of it. No one could iheW '
a more unshaken and unvarying-determination to dis.:
charge the duties, nor could any bne have discharged
them mere effectually to die satisfaction of the country.
For his own part, he felt peculiarly gratified that to
bear testimony to the acknowleJged merits and talents
of his Right Hon. Friend had fallen to his lot ; and he
begged further to express the 'great satisfaction he had
derived from the perfect coincidence of opinion that ex-
isted between himself and the President of the Board of
Trade, on every subject of public importance. H. was also happy
that the measures which had entirely changed the commercial
policy of the country had fallen into the hands of a person who had
so ably conceived, and so admirably conducted them, with such ad-
vantage and satisfaction to the country. (Cheers.) The Right Hon.
Gentleman concluded by moving.that a Salary of 5,000/. per annum,
be paid to the President of the Board of Trade for the time being.
Mr. HUME begged the Right Hon. Gentleman to
believe that no person entertained a higher opinion of
the Right Hon. Gentleman who filled the situation or
President of the Board of Trade, than himself. Ile bad,
moreover, not the slightest objection that the person
filling that important situation should receive a proper
remuneration for the discharge of his duty ; but he
could not suffer the question to proceed to a vote ss ir h-
oot asking, was the President of the Board of Trade to
continue also to receive the Salary affixed to the Office
of Treasurer of the Navy ? The Salary attached to this
latter office was too large, and the office itself might, in
fact, be dispensed with altogether, without injury to
the public service. Its emoluments might be transferred to the
President of the Board of Trade, and his Salary might be increased
to ihe proposed sum by the abolition of many small useless offices
which he could point out. He wished further to know, did the
Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Huslasatio) hold any other offices than
the two already mentioned.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER could
assure the Committee, that it had never entered into

the head of hip Right Hon. Friend, or into his own, that
he (Mr. Huskisson) should continue to receive the salary
attached to the office of Treasurer of the Navy, and that
now proposed to be paid to him as President of the
Board of Trade. In answer to the Right Hon. Gentle-
man's question, whether his Right Hon. Friend held any
other office, he could say that he held no other situation.
At the period of his appointment to the Presidency, of
the Board of Trade, his Right Hon. Friend held the
office of Agent for Sierra Leone, but which he then
resigned. The salary attached 'to the situation of Trea-
surer of the Navy was not greater than an officer of such
importance ought to receive; but there was no reason
why the Treasurer of the Navy 'should continue as he
did then, to occupy a house in Somerset House, which
could be applied to other public departments requiring
accommodation. When the office of Treasurer of the
Navy had been put into his own hands, the salary had
been reduced from 4,0001. to 3,0004 a year.; he could
not admit that that office was a sinecure. Any office
might become a sinecure in the hands of a person who
should not think proper to perform its duties. With
regard to the remaining suggestion of the Hon. Member,
he must say, that it did not appear to him that the
salary of the President of the Board of Trade ought to
be made up by cutting and carving here and there, and
squeezing a little out of a number of small offices.—( Hear, and a
laugh.)—There were no offices in existence that could be suppressed
without injury to the public service ; but even if there were, he
could not agree with the Hon. Gentleman, that we were not to
remunerate a deserving public aim, unless we could procure the
means, by hook or by crook—by lading out some other officess
with salaries, and without duties to be pmformed, with which to
make up the sum required.—(Hear!)
Mr. CALCRAFT subscribed to the opinion, so gene-
rally prevalent, that no Servant •of the- Crown dis-
charged hi; duty to the State with more ability or. in-
tegrity than the Right Hon. President of the Board of
Trade ; but he could not but look on the mode now
adopted for creating a new well paid office of 50001.
as a corer for increasing the patronage of the Minis-
ters of the Crown. There was nothing incompetent in
the performance of the duties of both situations : in fact
Mr. Secretary Dundas had, when actually Minister of this country,
filled the ofike of Treaaurerof the Navy.- Indeed of-so-little im-
port was It thought who filled that post, that it had even been filled
by the Speaker of the House of Commons.
Mr. ROBERTSON thought there was something
suspicious in the support which Members on the other
side of the House gave to the present proposition. The
Hon. Member then proceeded to advert to the Silk
Company, of which Mr. A. Baring had become Direc-
tor and Trustee; and to infer, from his having obtained
a charter for the Company about the period when he
supported an increase of salary to the President of the
Board of Trade, that there was some improper understanding;
and that Mr. A. Baring was to receive certain benefit from the

establishment:A his Company.
fair. BA RING said, in reference to the Silk Company,
that it was set on foot last year for the purpose of doing
great service, as it was said, to Ireland. With this
view he was induced to put his name to it. It was a
sort of experiment from which he never expected any
great benefit to be derived by the country. The whole
amount of his contribution was 2001. and not only
was this given without any expectation of profit, but
with a conviction that none could result—(Hear).—

He could not account for the Hon. Gentleman suppos-
ing that there was something mysterious lug king behind;
and he might be induced to enter into a more detailed
explanation of his conduct if he could suppose the
statement was entertained seriously by the House, but
be could not. He trusted there would be no opposition
to the motion. He objected to sinecures, but the Right
11,,n. Gentleman was entitled to full and ample remu-
neration for his services. The Chancellor of the Ex-
chequer said the office of Treasurer was an efficient
olfLe ; but if it were so, how could it be performed by
tt.e verson who filled it at present. This was a mix.
taken notion which tupposed a high salary should be
given hecau,e it was a situation of-great responsibility.
The private fortinte of an individual was nothing compared to the
millions that must pass through his hands ; and their only security
W 414 in his integrity, and iu their frequently auditing the accounts.
Mr. PEEL said, if these debates were confined to
these walls, he would not say a word in defence of the
conduct of his Right Hun. Friend. Had he been now
present, he would have met the insinuations of the Hon.

M: tuber for GrAmpound as they deserved ; and he
(Mr. Peel) was quite astonished how that Hon. Member
could have attempted to fix a stain on the purity and
integrity /ibis It ght Hun. Friend's conduct relative to
his votes in that House. He was quite ashamed to heir
it said that the paltry profit to be had upon a sum of,
2001. could have the slightest influence on his Right
Hon. Friend relative to the p urt he took in procuring
the charier which uas alluded to. He was astonished
apd ashamed at such. an insinuation, breathe, of all

other men, perhaps, there WAS not one within the walls
9f Parliament who brought more clearness, more
petienes, and more discretion, to• the consideration of

legreTy question thin his Right Hon. Friend—and to
pO'man mole eaiinently added high mental powers.
With respect to the Allusion which 1144 been thrown out to,

relative to the severing the.effices of President of the
Board of Trade and the Treasurer of the Navy, he did
saot now wish to enter into any- discussion, .although he
isatready -to admit he saw no advantage in limiting the
ttrOviticei in onoSerson, and paying, as if 3,0004 a year
for the discharge-of one duty, and 2,0001. for the other.
Every one knew how onerous and laborious were the
duties of the President of the Board of Tiede, and every
one knew how inadequately the able discharge of those duties had
been rewarded. The first question then would be, should the
Committee agree to the proposed vote and then the second ques-
tion, which-could lie over for future discussion would be, whether
the two offices should be frparated ? Without wishing to occupy
more of the time of the Committee, be gave the proposed vote his
611 and eordlal support.
Mr. M A BERLY was of opinion, that if the services
of able men were required, they should be fairly paid
for. Every man must say that the President of the
Board of Trade deserved all that could be given to
him ; and in now giving him an increased salary this
*louse would be only doing justice to themsel%es and
to the country. He agreed with the Right Honourable
Gentleman (Mr. Peel), that the services of men-like the
President of the Board of Trade should be adequately
remunerated; and he wa, also of opinion, that the
slices of President and Treasurer of the Navy should be separated.
However, as that would more properly form the subject of future
discussion, he would now 'give the proposed vote his full and 1
entire concurrence.
Mr. BER NA L expressed his regret that such a Vote should I
have been ptoposed in so very thin a House as the present.—He
was of opinion that the office of Treasurer of the Navy might be
altogether abolished or re-modelled. Why might not the account
kept by the Treasurer of the Navy be shifted, along with the re-
sponsibility, to the Bank of England ? Five thousand a year was
nut too much for the Office of President of the Board of Trade, but
he objected to having that office in any way mixed up with that of
Treasurer of the Navy, and should certainly vote against the Grant,
unless the Chancellor of the Exchequer would pledge himself to
have it re-modelled.
Mr. PHILIPS concurred in what had fallen from the preceding
Member, and joined in the encomium passed on the President of
the Board of Trade.
Mr. CA LCRAFT must protest against the measure, es creating
a new office, and lodging additional influence in the hands of the
Crown, under pretence of remunerating a popular President of the
Board of Trade. There was no occasion for a Treasurer of the
Navy, or a Treasurer at all; the Paymaster of the Navy could do
all the duties equally well; and he should, therefore, oppose the
giant, unless it was distinctly understood that that Treasurership
.aheuld be abolished, or remodelled..
Mr. ROBERTSON maintained, that the present measures at
the Right lion. the President of the Board of Trade would ruin
the Landed Interest. He, therefore, opposed the vote to the Right
Hon. Gentleman, who was the cause of the late distresses of the
country, and who was neglectful of all save the Foreign Merchant.
Mr. LOCK lIART asked, whether the Right lion. Gentleman
(Mr. Huskisson) would resign his seat in Parliament, in conse-
quence of the increase of salary. •
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHE%UER observed, in
reply, that there was no reference in the resolution to that point,
nor any necessity fur making any. On a former occasion, a clause
bad been inserted in the Bill, to prevent the Member front vacating
his seat; but that was a matter for future consideration. With
regard to the-office of Treasurer of the Navy, if he could Ming
himself to believe that it was a mere sinecure, he should most
readily pledge himself to its abolition; but he was aware, from
experience, that it was no such thing. If its duties were trans.
(erred to the Paymaster, a salary of £l,OOO would be too little.
The Treasurer of the Wavy had not merely to pay away the sums I
for which draughts were made upon him, bat to ascertain whetbus
these sums were actually due to the person to whom they were
ordered to be paid. The office was in fact no sinecure ; there were
upwards of forty Acts of Parliament to regulate its duties.—[ Mr.
Hums: Consolidate them]. That would not lighten the duty, and
he felt certain, that the abolition of the office would be productive
of essential injury to the Navy.
Mr. T. WILSON could not acquiesce in the vote, when he con-
sidered the present state of the country. As it bad been passed by
last year when the sun was shining upon them, be thought the pre-
sent moment very injudiciously chosen for the intoduction of such
a measure.

Mr. HUME moved as an amendment, that 50001. a year be
the salary of the President of the Board of Trade, but with this
accompanying qualification,—that it be expedient to inquire "lie-
&her any of the existing offices could be abolished to save and rrdke
opy the above amount of 'ataxy.
Sir F. 0M MA N NEY spoke in favour of the original resolution,
and spoke of the great responsibility of the office of Treasurer of
the Navy.
Mr. BARING suggested that it would be better to leave out
the consideration of the office of Treasurer of the Navy.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, the two
offices were not necessarily connected. He was the first who held
the Treasurership of the Navy and the Presidentship of the Board
of Trade. The question now was, whether 50001. a year should
be given to the president of the Board of Trade? When the
office of Treasurel. of the Navy came to be considered, the House
might deal with it as it pleased.
Mr. ELLICE assented to the motion for granting what he
thought a moderate allowance of 50001. a year to the President of
the Board of Trade—than whom no man could fill the office with
greater credit to himself, or more advantage to the country. He
thought the Right Hon. Gentlemen opposite should pledge them-
selves to a reduction in some other branches of the public service.
Mr. MABERLY could not support the original motion, unless
It was modified, as far as it respected the Treasurership of the
Navy.
Mr. BROGDEN said that one amendment could not be moved
on another.
After a few words from Mr. CALOIATT, Mr. R. SMITH, and. Mr.
T. Wilson,
Mr. HUME said, that if the House went into the Committee of
Inquiry, he should point out many offices from which the saving
might be made.
Mr. PEEL said that an inquiry into the nature of other offices
was pot necessarily connected with the present motion. It was
not denied that the proposed salary was too great, and whether it
were great or small, if there were any useless offices, let the House
abolish them, without any reference to the present question. The
Hon. Member need not much regret the rejection of his amend-
ment now, as he would have an opportunity of bringing on the
subject again in his motion on useless offices—offices performed by
deputy, and the whole list of pensions.
After some conversation, in which Mr. Hiner, Mr. Secretary
PeaL, Mr. R. Swim, Mr. ELLICE, Mr. BARING, and the CHAN-
mum of the Enamor", severally took a part,
The Right Hon. GENTLEMAN consented to withdraw his motion
till to-morrow.
The House then resumed.

The Report was then brought up, and the Chairman begged
leave to sit again.