The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1852-03-23 00:00:00

Of smog AI
lr
This was an action to recover a balance 0' -,aes.,/7"
£36 10s. 100. upon a contract. The arties in " frbr,
P p
live at Miles Platting, near Manchester, the P
a brickmaker, and the defendants dealing in bra
the beginning of 1851 the p arties entered 1110,7e0101
to make bricks upon land belonging to the ',ells.
under which 368,430 bricks were made, ..dr„,r
per thousand, and other work was done,. -oil ty
ments made between the parties, which 004
the claim of the plaintiff to £36 las. 10-0.
corn
part of the defendant it was contended that'
.., 0,71
for the clay and other matters, the plaintiff "neo„s f 5
paid by a sum of £1 be. Bd. The plaintiff and °,4 9'
defendants were called, and the evidence was
.11
conflicting nature.
Thejury found for the plaintiff—damages, £6lo:lur
AN ATTORNEY'S DILL. Art
In this action, Mr. R. D. Law, an attoradmobil,
chester, was the plaintiff, and Mrs. Sarah 1,311"'061$
widow lady, resieing at Broughton, in the seca°
bourhood, the defendant. aa,
Mr. Serseant Wilkins and another were c(l,-
the plaintiff, and Mr. Atherton for the defeacia,„%tiltrif
It appeared from the evidence, that the 10"'„ OHO
acted as attorney for the defendant, in the Yes,fleisl,,4k
the conduct of two causes—one in the Comlnn,",(lV,
Lancaster, and the other in the Salford 111inu,r6,90,
The amount sought to be recovered was £46 isisigSk
which £3O was paid into court. At the Aug° ift
.119
1859, the plaintiff was engaged in an action
Mrs. Lancashire was plaintiff, and a pergo
0, 01.14
Rodgers, the defendant. On the 10th of Alter PI
le Ow
being commission day, Mr. Law received A, he O
Mrs. Lancashire, in which she requested tii.)8:110°N1
proceed no further in the action against 14";,Pni
Upon this, he called upon her and stated, that'll sAis,
agents had been instructed to enter the cangeloloo
had no doubt it was done, and the conseetiene,,'sts °fool
that Mrs. Lancashire would have to pay the c" she
day if she did not allow the action to go on' 4(114. J.
told the plaintiff to go on with it, and a v OW:4
obtained against Rodgers for the full amount
50
The verdict was subsequently set aside ia t,".t the
court, on an affidavit from Mrs. Lancashire t"" 10
had been carried on contrary to her wish. be
Mr. ATHERTON, for the defendant, on-
be ,
L 04
even upon the showing of the plaintiff himself' tee
entitled to recover ; for had Mr. Law ascertain the
nature of the case, he would not have ineurrea
he now wished to obtain from the defendant.
The learned JUDGE, in summing up, told tu'thelim"P
the question for them to consider was, whether
th, j008',"
tiff was justified in incurring the costs he ha" wit"'
they were of opinion that he was justified, then "y wet
diet must be for the plaintiff; if, however, f.,,,e0r9
opinion that the plaintiff had been guilty of a" t 54. 0
0
want of care or caution in advising the defendleplol
the costs were unnecessarily incurred, thee t
was not entitled to recover.
The jury, after a few minutes' consultation'
verdict for the defendant

0,1 II
BRADWELL AND ANOTHER V. -,irr wok,
In this case a verdict was taken for the P
consent, subject to a reference

NUISANCE. to OP
BROWN V. REDEERN.—This was an action - AMA,
ccmpensalion in damages for injury done t°ganc,llloll
course. The parties reside at Cheetham, near
.;c1 el got
ter, and it appeared they had become possegi—Jo'li.,oo
which formerly belonged to a party natneuldlt`"
Since his death a number of houses had been "blow".
the property, and by means of filth from tbelor alolr
fish-pond and water-course was rendered unfit
After the case had been opened by the attorneYoo
Mr. ATHERTON, for the defendant, said be rtirsstrpol
the facts as stated, but wished his lordship.telecl /10
opinion as to whether the defendant was Psi'
in the course he had taken. He wished his O 0 , t
boitol
intimate his opinion as to whether the defenda, th°,
acquired a right to use the water-course as,..:7Jobln,
proper, there being no doubt that the Par,"hiroVt
from whom he obtained the property had a "4,:i tb°,:o°
His LORDSHIP said there could be no detl_,'"terTatt
person in possession had a right to twin foul "Zit
stream, that would not give a new corner a rig"beir4
He recollected the late Lard Ellenborough op; ed,
ceedingly angry with such a defence being geed
said because a person had been half poiseo,;,
bre
stench it was no reason why another should "
to his premises to finish him. fr
'
Under these circumstances Mr. Atherton f-11VI
,00
a verdict being taken for the plaintiff. Pac°
costs 40s

pe
SPECIAL JURIES. ethe 5
Mr. WATSON applied to his lordship to al (foil
jury cases.
60(0
t
his LORDSHIP said his usual course was tonool
beginning with the special juries, and go tho',l
were got through, but he would not fix °
to-morrow afternoon

CRIM. CON. aeor
It is said there is an important case of this horn
the rarties residing in Manchester, and the
Solicitor Generals being employed on each st

POLICE COURT, YESTERDAY

tlir
gob,r
ROBBERY AT FAWCETT'S FOUNDRI''' 141.0cce 01104
cliffe, one of the hands employed at Mes'r''
Preston's foundry, York-street, was brOug 001 P;
charge of stealing a quantity of steel screw-l3P;:ne
copper bolts, from a drawer belonging to thy!
"finishers" at the foundry. It appeared fr°,'"; boa, V
lit °Po
Bence, that property to the value of about X."'.50010,
lately missed, and, suspicion falling on the Prblovs",„
movements were watched, and he was seen t°,,ibiej
thing from the drawer in which the proeert'olieniC,
deposited. In consequence of this, he was 501
custody, and a number of tap
Ps found on his Pe' Otis"
on searching his house, the cop er bolts, Scc',t' os6dtl.,c*
covered. The value of the articles restored atlice
about 161. The prisoner admitted having Od
coll( f 0 e ofifi
but said he had taken the taps for the purrs to,
his nephew to adjust a lathe for him by the"" ,
proved, however, that this was an absurd state s00tIli!i
the prisoner was sent to gaol for two Malths',ro4ooro
CHARGE OF EMBEZZLEMENT AGAINST fi-rriej
VELLER,—A respectably-dressed man, ntyylitlifoll,
Pearson, was remanded on a charged of enweeoplffr „i‘
of money amount'ng to £3 ls. 4(1. was,' rs I°/1/ 'Ol
Messrs. Sandford and Morley, to solicit or"e-theddirotilli
and occasionally received accounts for thelll„;prOl9'ciel#
their regular collector. He was paid by ,c-tbc ofd,
the rate of 21 per cent. on the mount 0, yehrijictee
received. It appeared that on the 23r...„.(1
was paid the sum mentioned by a Mr. w Ilse;
had not handed over. Mr. Wright, it .se'n. r, f 0 t 0
unwilling to give evidence against the proc'ese Ile,: or'
the court immediately on his name beidgAgtrs",4o:,
testimony, in consequence of which the m°,s,,,„,dst" r
a summons to be issued, compelling his e"io-ser 00101
SMUGGLING.—A foreign sailor, named fis° t 0 11~
nate, (rather a misnomer, it would seed3"ol)l°
prison for 21 days in default of being po pit
a fine of forty shillings inflicted on hialnal b 9 inr
211bs. of foreign made cigars. He was 'ice L',." retirle
nanGarenaot
tHgoi
vwianrgd -as
satisfactoryt r e et, vy i with
stne''reat.ctolotipolyit,
poffioscseerss9ioln,
was taken into custody.—The Customs' 8:„ 01,00 ori'
for a remand in the case of the mas'''" eVtO9l7
Arequipa, foom Coquimba, who stands chor.f,
th
ing unlawfully concealed in a secret recess, ofcoehrelili
set of drawers, in his private cabin, I„,4l,,u'vritoo
111 b. foreign manufactured tobacco. lugf pdp,„•o•4
released until Thursday, on the sum on tliso
deposited as security for his reappearance °it
A SON CHARGED BY HIS PARENTS• ~111-070,f*,
named Thomas Poland, was charged by ;
breaking into their house, in Cleveland-sq',,f- Pre,'
day night. Mr. Poland stated he was a ta,-14° an
kept a stand in Cleveland-square markei'mlia'd
wife were out of the house on Saturday et 10 oio Acjr
Mrs. Poland returning home by herself siat-be
one had got into the house. She obtaine",,..ooloeir„t
of the police, had the burglar taken into tforus 0, or
turned out to be her own son who had bee-I'oll%ol°ol
house on account of his bad habits. The„,o `',;"to
did not wish to press the charge, if his P:0110.104,
keep away from them. He had been cdn'..,rorlo`lis"
him the house, as he (the son) refused td,"„,o
with bad associates, coming home only w,il-raett„tiv
son to apprehend danger from his wicked Pe to°''
magistrate sent the prisoner to gaol for oe
Otvlef ,r
,p
STEALING BEDCLOTHES.. otiO'pri
tied woman, was sent to gaol for two en„, lie IP,
stolen a sheet and blanket from a house ,ng
where she had lodged. 11-1°°,,t01.-ktio°Oril
ASSAULT AND ROBBERY.—A ruffiaairoc.-eigaii
was sent to prison for two months, fer Pn
Mr. John Fowler, North-street, at 9:0_,,1ie
Sunday morning. The prosecutor was ;.eno`;rge:ll
his wife
slightly iaendligsiuseteri: at
Thethe tpirmisecnoefrthweeoseealsrotctip
abut
ASV;
having stolen is. 6d. at the same time,
cod
the evidence was not dearly establiShed• ooh- or!) t
STEALING PROVISIONS.—Ann firitt
for one month for stealing nibs. of hFieeilocloi,looooool
and a loaf, from the house of Mary -"LO „il f
wick-street, on Saturday night. Mrs., 0;00'
at the time, but a witness saw the PrO-fter" , t
make away with the articles, which were? PAP 0,
in the prisoner's possession and identineA;ooo„,lsl
BIGAMY.—A man, named William "f J011;;00 01'
witted for trial, for having on the 15th of coroil
St. Silas' Church, in this town, marrie"„peol.o°ol4okie,
gap, his first wife being then alive. It 1,91-lirti.kil,.l
evidence of the prisoner's sister, Hardiai7s ChilbdoPre,
on the Gth of June, 1840, at St. NU' get"-itlirollif
Derbyshire, the prisoner was married r,ouse,,s fi grj'
ley, who was now stopping at witness and-: 11100,0
had lately been confined. The prisoner a
.Piiiilol4
lived together for six or seven years, at 15090,07)
Tansley, but afterwards left and came °B et, oft, r
being married to prisoner at the ht col
Caroline Mulligan, of 31, Cazneaulitor
Prisoner paid his addresses to her for eig t
.1
before they were married, and she had ¢OO,
had another wife till about three weeks 9"

Pgi4V
___.----- o°o 0 0.
~, ,eif DO JA
EXTRAORDINARY CURE OF RHEUMATIC 1,,,1"011,A0 WO
LOWAY'S PILLS, IN VAN DIEMEN'S LAND. es, A oor? 1,9
nigan, nineteen years of age, residing' a for le tlf 11,
suffering from a violent rheumatic 1 f_ of t_re 0, Ito i
months, which had entirely depriv u
abprr the cll li"0/,,
limbs. During this period she un—e Toil`" Pr/44'J
the most eminent medical me 140bar.id polo ,! ip•
her case was considered hop.eless• A frive!llS WPtiOiee
parents to try Holloway!‘ celebrated = , Ze o. eCO
sented to do, and in au-Incredibly short oPit,..se or
cure was effected....--The particulars of this "
the Ilobardginth Courier.