The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1839-04-02 00:00:00

CROWN COURT.-SATURDAY.

His lordship took his seat on the bench at nine o'clock
• this morning.
Charles- Tagan, who was found guilty yesterday of an ag-
gravated 'case of manslaughter, was placed at the bar to re-
ceive the sentence of the court.—His LORDSHIP observed,
that he entertained considerable doubt whether the case was
not one of murder. He then sentenced the prisoner to
transportation for life.

Thos. Fealy, who was convicted on Thursday of burglary,
near St. Helens, was sentenced► to imprisonment for 18
months in Lancaster Castle, and to be kept to hard labour.
James Woodward, who was yesterday found guilty of
horse-stealing, was sentenced to imprisonment in Lancaster
Castle for 18 months, and to be kept to hard labour.

CUTTING AND STABBING NEAR ROCHDALE.
Thomas Mills, Thomas Taylor, Edmund Lord, and Th6s.
Kenworthy, were indicted for having, at Castleton, feloni-
ously cut and stabbed one John Dearden. The indictment
contained three counts : the first set forth that the wounds
were inflicted with intent to murder ; the second that they
were inflicted with intent to maim the prosecutor; and the
third set forth that they were inflicted with intent to do the
prosecutor some grievous bodily harm.
John Dearden.—l am a pensioner, and live near Rochdale.
On the 23d October I was sitting in my house at two o'clock
in the morning, in company with two men named Ashton
and Fernley. They ran in for protection, and in about three
or four minutes afterwards the man Ashton went out. Four
men came into the house. He could not identify any of the
prisoners as being the persons. He desired them to leave
the house ; they refused to do so, and he got up to procure
the assistance of a constable. As he was going, one of the
men laid hold of him by the waist, and pushed him against
the door-cheek. Another of the men went in front of him.
The other two parties went out, and stood at a little distance
from them. A scuffle ensued between witness and the two
men, and during it he received a stab. •
The JUDGE.—Did you, before you received the stab, strike
either of the two men, or did you in anyway interfere with
them ?—I positively did not. I received the wound in the
belly, which I felt immediately on the knife entering me. I
cried out to my wife, " Oh ! take me into the house; for my
belly is out. The men then- roii away. • I received two
wounds. My bowela were hanging on the
Cross-examined by Mr. WILKINg.—I had been drinking.
A person named Clough and I had had three pints of ale. I
heard nothing: whatever respecting a clog that I had up stairs,
.• • • • • •

ek, .s,

and that they claimed ; nor did any of them express a wish
to go up stairs.
Frances Dearden, wife of the prosecutor, confirmed his
testimony as to the entrance of the men into the house, and
the violence of the assault and the stabbing they were then
guilty of.
Richard Ashton.—Fernley and I went to Dearden's house
on the night in question. We were together on the Oldham-
road that night, in the neighbourhood of Rochdale. We
were annoyed by five or six men, and in consequence we
went to Dearden's house for protection. Two men then
came up, and subsequently two others followed them. The
prisoners at the bar were the parties. They entered the
house, and after remainin_g a short time they went out. I
followed them out, and recognised them to be four of the
men who annoyed me on the road. I heard them speak
together, and say, " Let us go back,-and break the windows

of-Dearden's house." They accordingly came, and broke
the windows of the house. They had been drinking at the
Dusty Miller public-house. I seized one.of the men. They
said something about a dog they had lost. Lord seized the
prosecutor, and Taylor and Mills joined in the scuffle. In
the midst of the disturbance one of them stabbed the prose-
cutor. They ran off, and shortly after the constables were
informed of the affray.
Grace Shore.—l live near Dearden's house. On Sunday
morning, between two and three o'clock, I heard a cry. I
then went out and found a hat and cap at the door. Dear-
den was lying on the floor. Gave the hat and cap to Heron,
the constable. They were produced.
Cross-examined.—l keep a beer-house. The sign of my
house is the " Staff of Life." Dearden was drinking_in the

house—his wife was also there. I saw no men with her.
Ashton was at my 'house with his master. Fernley was not
in my house. Dearden was neither drunk nor sober.
Cross-examined by Mr. BRANDT.—What is the staff of
life? Witness.—Well, it is bread and cheese.—(Laughter.)
Hirani Lord.—l am owner of the public-house called the
" Dusty Miller." I had to put the prisoners out of my house
on the night in question, between twelve and one o'clock.
Taylor, the prisoner, had the hat on him, that was produced
by the constable. The men had two dogs with them.
Cross-examined.--Ashton was at my house that night,
after the prisoners went away.
. Robert Orrell.—(a boy of 15 years of age)—l live about 300
hundred yards from Dearden's. I recollect Sunday morning
the 21st October. I saw the prisoner Mills, who is called
Twig by a by-name, came into my father's house about five
o'clock in the morning. He said to me, " come, make the
door, make the door,' —he cried " murder," and said, " that
a whole lane full of Irishmen were going to attack him.", He
said they had taken one Of his companions. He had a knife
in his hand—the blade wkrdsLanclyeet,—like wale blood. He
told me to blow the candle out and darkenlhe':;,fire. He
wiped the knife on his trowsers, and then put it-in his right
hand waistcoat pocket. (The witness .identified the knife,
which was a common clasp knife.)
William Bentley.—l am a constable at Rochdale. I heard
of the attack on Dearden. I went to his house on the Sun-
day morning in question, about half-past fouro'clock. I got
an account of the persons who were accused. In consequence
I went in search of them, and in a short time I met Lord and
Mills. I told Lord that I was going to arrest him for stab-
bing Dearden. While putting the handcuffs on him, he said,
I should pursue the man (Mills) who had the knife, and was
guilty. Mills was taken into cnstody half an hour after. This
occurred about thirty or forty yards from Orrell's.
Cross-examined by Mr. WiLKINs.—A. man named Hiram
Lord, of the " Dusty Miller," heard the conversation.

He Heron, a constable.—l went to Dearden's house about
three or four o'clock on Sunday morning. Mills was taken
about three quarters of a mile from Dearden's. I took Ken-

worthy and Taylor into custody at their houses, and on taking
them to prison we met Mills. He was put into the lock-ups
at Rochdale.

Elizabeth Jackson.—l was put into the lock-ups at Roch-
dale, on a charge of drunkenness, on Saturday night. The
prisoners were brought into prison. While Mills was being
searched, he threw a knife into my lap. I kept it till the con-
stables went away, and then I offered it to Mills, who told
me to keep it, and do what I liked with it. Bentley, the con-
stable, came in about an hour, and asked Mills what he had
done with the knife, he said, he had none. The knife was
still in my bosom. Mr. Wooley then came, I told him
where the knife was, and he took it off the ledge where I
placed it. Wooley, the constable, identified the knife, pro-
duced as the one.

Sangran Barker.—l was called up on Sunday morning to
see Dearden. He had received two wounds—one, about an
inch below the navel, two inches in extent, through•which
the bowels protruded—the other, to theleft of the navel, was
four inches in extent, through which the bowels also pro-
truded—they protruded 4 feet, and were also wounded. I
never saw such a case, nor did I ever read of a recovery on
record under such circumstances. Dearden might have been
drinking. I can't speak as to the state of his wife.
The case for the prosecution here ended.
Mr. WILKINS addressed the jury on behalf of the pri-
soners.

The learned JUDGE then proceeded to charge the jury :
He observed, that in consideringthe present case they should
remove from their minds all reference to the second clause

of the indictment, as no evidence had been produced to show
the wound were inflicted with intent to maim the prosecu-
tor. His lordship then recapitulated the evidence to the
jury, and explained to theta the law of the ca3e as applicable
to the two other clauses of the indictment upon which the
prisoners—
Verdict7-Thomas Mills guilty, on the 3d count of the in-
dictment. The other prisoners were acquitted.
His LORDSHIP, on passing on the prisoner the sentence of
transportation for 15 years, again expressed his strong repro-
bation of the use of the knife, which, he regretted to say, was
recently coming into familiar practice.
_ _ CHARGE OF KILLING AND SLAYING.

Robert Formby was indicted for having, on the 24th De-
cember last, at Liverpool, killed and slain one John Riley.
• Robert Layton—l work in the Fish-market. I know
Spink's spirit-vaults. I was in it on Christmas-eve last. I
know John Riley—he was there. The prisoner was also
there, and had a glass of ale before him. Riley called the
prisoner a inollycod. The prisoner said nothing. Riley
made fun of the prisoner; he took his fingers and placed
them as if to pull the prisoner's nose. The prisoner threw
a glass of ale in his face. A struggle ensued, and Riley fell.
The prisoner kicked Riley, but not while he was on the
ground. Beattie, who keeps the tap, came round, and
signed to the prisoner to go out. He did so.,
Cross-examined by Mr. MURPHY. I cant say whether
Riley fell by a slip or a blow. The prisoner is a very quiet,
inoffensive man.
Thomas Beattie, the manager of. the tap at Mr. Spinks's
spirit-vaults, corroborated the former witness's statement as
to the dispute between the prisoner and the deceased. Riley
was in the habit of using very abusive language to the pri-
soner on former occasions, winch he patiently bore.
Cross-examined.—He is a very quiet inoffensive man.
Martha Owens.—l saw Riley and the prisoner in the
vaults on Christmas-eve. Riley used very aggravating lan-
guage' and pulled the prisoner's nose—they then fought, and
Riley fell. down.. I did not see the prisoner kick Riley when
he was down. Riley got up and struck the prisoner twice,
and he vtas knocked down again. A man named William
Drapet said, don't kick him (Riley) when he is down.
Wil6ain Draper confirmed the testimony of the preceding
witnesses, and added the prisoner made a kick at deceased
when lie wa.s down.. Witness said " dont kick him."
Charles D. Baylis, surgeon at the South Dispensary. I
was sent to see John Riley on the day after Christmas. He
was labouring under acute pain, and complained of having
received a- blow on the day but one before Christmas. He
died on the evening of the 26th, made a post ,mortern ex-
amination, there was much inflamation of the intestures, and
an internal rupture that brought the bowels into the abdomen.
Cross-examined.—Great exertion might have occasioned
the rupture, owing to the previously diseased state of his
bowels.

By the JUDGE.—A kick was likely to produce the rupture,
more likely than a concussion or overreaching, overreaching
of itself would not produce the rupture of the bowels. The
coats of the peritoneum were partially worn away by previous
disease, but there was more inflamation of the viscera on the
opposite side.
Mary Duffy.—Ryley lived with me. I went to see him on
Christmas day. He was vomiting greatly, he said he was a
murdered man, and would never get over it. He said he knew
the kick he got would be his death.

Surgeon Baylis—From the symptoms I first saw taken in
connection with the post mortem examination, my opinion
is that he could not live any length of time.
Mary Duffy—said the deceased attributed his death to the
kick the prisoner gave him on the right side.
Mr. MURPHY for the prisoner, urged with much eloquence,
that the death of the deceased was owing to the previous
disceased state of his intestines, which was aggraved by the
fall he received while attempting to assault the prisoner, he
contended also, that even if the prisoner kicked the deceased,
he was fully justified, in so resenting the insults and provo-
cation he received.

After a brief charge from his LORDSHIP,
The jury returned a verdict of not guilty.
UTTERING COUNTERFEIT COIN.
Bridget M' Laughin, was indicted for a misdemeanor, in
having uttered on the 24th January last, a counterfeit six-
pence, and having in her possession• 13 counterfeit sixpences.
Hannah Crompton.—l live with Mr. Ash, of Heaton
Norris. He keeps a public-house. I saw the prisoner at
the bar on that day, about two o'clock in the afternoon. She
asked for gill of fourpenny beer. I served her, and she gave
me sixpence, which I gave to my mistress. The prisoner
asked me for fivepence in copper.
Mrs. Ash made a similar statement to the above. When
1 received the sixpence, I told her it was a bad one. I sent
for a constable.

John Walters, (police officer) arrested the prisoner, and
found on her person 13 counterfet sixpences, which she en.
deavoured to conceal.

Mr. Powell of the Mint, stated that the money was bad.
Verdict, guilty. Sentence, one year's imprisonment, and
hard labour in Lancaster Castle.

Thomas Kelly was indicted for having feloniously, at Liver-
pool, uttered to one Sarah Grace, one bad shillihg, well
knowing the same to be base, he having been before convicted
of uttering base coin.

The foriner conviction and punishment of the prisoner
having been proved,
Sarah Grace (shopkeeper to Mr. Carlile, stationer, Bold-
street,) proved the utterance of the counterfeit money by the
prisoner.
James M'Gill, (an officer of Bridewell,) searched the pri-
soner when he was brought to the prison by Edwards the
constable, and found some good, and some counterfeit money
in his possession.
Mr. Powell of the Mint, stated the money was counterfeit.
Verdict, guilty. Sentence, transportation for seven years.
John M'Anallii was indicted for having at Manchester, on
the 4th of February last, utterred to one Elizabeth Drum-
niond, one base sixpence, he well knowing the same to be
base, and with having in his possession a mould for counter-
feiting sixpences. _

Mrs. Drummond.—The prisoner came to her shop to buy
half an ounce of tobacco, and in payment of it, he gave her
a counterfeit sixpence. He was taken into custody.
J. Cross.—l took the prisoner into custody, and got a
counterfeit sixpence that he attempted to pass to Mrs. Drum-
mond. I searched the prisoner's house in Rodney-street,
Manchester, and found a mould and spoon used for making
bad money. Daggat, another officer, accompanied me.
Robert Daggat confirmed the above evidence.
Mr. Powell stated that the moulds produced had been used
for counterfeiting sixpences, and also the spoon.
It was also proved that the room rented by the prisoner
was the one in which the moulds were found.

His LORDSHIP said that the prisoner was indicted for a
violation of the 10th section of an act which was passed in
the reign of his late Majesty, (the 2d William 1V.,) which
consolidated all the laws relating to counterfeit coin. This
section made the possession of moulds for coining a felony.
Verdict—Guilty.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL stated that the prisoner was in
the habit of employing children to pass the base coin for him.
His LORDSHIP sentenced him to seven years' transporta-
tion.

ATTEMPT AT MURDER IN LIVERPOOL.
Nathan Booth„ labourer, late of. Liverpool, was indicted
for having, at Liverpool, feloniously shot and discharged two
loaded pistols at one Timothy Parkinson, with intent to
murder him.

Counsel for the prosecution Mr. Armstrong, for the pri-
soner Mr. Murphy.
Timothy Parkinson was the first witness called. Being
sworn, •he stated—l keep a public-house in Roe-street, in
this borough. The prisoner and I married two sisters. Pre-
vious to the 2nd March last, the day the unfortunate trans-
action took place, there had been a difference between us.
which arose' from money transactions, but it was arranged.
The p,risqmer_had lent me money on several occasions, and I
had settled with him. There was a bill transaction between
us of £2O, which I paid on the Monday before the occurrence
in question. We had a quarrel respecting it at my house, on
the. Sunday previous. It was an accommodation bill that he

gave to me for £2O. I had not taken it up when it became
due, but I took it up on the Monday, and gave it to his fa-
ther, and took means to inform him of its payment on the
same day. Between that Sunday and Saturday, the 2d of
March,' I saw him once but did not speak to him. On that
Saturday evening he came into my spirit vaults, and asked
for two penn'orth of rum. This was about half-past eight
o'clock in the evening. He laid down a shilling to pay for
it, and I gave him the change. He then ordered and I gave
him a second two penn'orth of rum, which he also paid for.
He did not drink it, but left the place. He returned again
about half-past ten o'clock the same evening. I was behind
the counter when he came in. He then asked for two
penn'.orth of rum on trust, which he got. I was at this time
leaving the vaults, and as I was going out—for I then had my
hat on—l said to my boy, " I'll be back in five minutes."
The prisoner was then within five or six feet of me. There
was a pier glass over the chimney piece, and I was between
it and the prisoner. I hardly turned towards the prisoner,
as I was obliged to do, going out, when I heard the report of
a pistol, and immediately felt a stunning sensation on my
cheek bone. I then dropped on' my knee, and thinking I
had been wounded I raised my hands to my head. Finding
I was not wounded I rushed into the " snug," which is a
small apartment behind the counter partitioned off the rest
of the shop. I then heard the report and saw the flash of
another pistol. He was after this taken into custodoy by
Flockhart, a police-officer, who was in the vaults during the
entire transaction. He (tie police-officer) examined the pier
glass, and found that it was,broken. He found a pistol ball,
flattened, behind the glass, which it had gone through at the
first shot. He also found another ball in the ceiling of the
vault, and it was also flattened.

'Cross-examined by Mr. MURPFIY.—There was a great
number of people in the vaults ; I should say about 20 or 30 ;
they were all standing round the counter, and in a position to
hear any remarks that were made. The quarrel we had re-
specting the £2O. accommodation bill took place on the Sun-
day previous to the firing of the pistols. The prisoner was
aware several days before the Saturday in question that the
bill had been taken up by me. I have known him since he
was married, which was in September' 1830, the day on which
the Manchester Railway was opened. I held the office of
Serjeant at Mace, which was a situation that required the
possession of money. At any time I wanted money, and
made application to the prisoner, he was always willing to
advance me what I required. Between the years 1832 and
1836 he was in the constant habit of advancing me sums of
money, the amount he lent me was considerable for a man
in his situation of life. He not only lent me money, but
gave me accommodation bills.. I was at one time liable to
an attachment, and not having the money to, spare himself,
he applied to his father and got the loan of £4O. for me, he
was also security at another time for me, for £75. Mr.
Bardswell, the solicitor, was the person who was entitled to
the amount. There was also a debt of £2O. due by me to
Messrs, Dewharst, Stewart, Dewhurst & Co. of this town,
for the payment of which a person named Donaldson ad-
vanced me the money on the prisoner's security. It was of
great importance that I should have had the money on that
occasion, as the municipal act then came into operation. It
was of such importance that a bonus of £5O. would have been
given for obtaining the sum. He went as a joint security to
Donaldson for the money. It was determined when the
municipal bill came into operation, to appoint a new officer
to the situation I held. I applied for compensation for the
loss of the office. The amount I sought, at first, and would
have been satisfied to receive, was £6OO. or £7OO. Was it
not owing to his suggestion that you battled for and suc-
ceeded in getting for your compensation, an advance of from
£6OO. or X7OO. to £9OO ? It was in a great measure owing
to him, but others also advised me. On one occasion, an
acceptance of mine was received in consequence of my in-
ability to pay it, and he was my security. Until about 15
months ago, we were always good friends, and lived on the
most intimate terms. The cause of the dispute was respect-
ing the expences of fitting up my house, and had no relation
to the £2O. transaction. The prisoner is a furniture broker
and cabinet maker ; he supplied me with the fixtures, furni-
ture, &c. for fitting up my house. The room in which the
quarrel (the firing of the pistols) took place, is about 8 or 9
feet in breadth, and 15 feet in length. The party who tired
the first pistol must have been 6 or 7 feet distant from the
,
glass, and 4or 5 feet from me: When the second pistol was
tired I must have been nearer to him. The second ball was
found in the ceiling. The distance from the place where the
man stood, to that point on the floor, which would be touched
by a perpendicular line suspended from the part of the ceiling
that the 1)411 perforated, could not be greater than 6 or 7 feet.
The ball Must have passed over my head 4or 5 inches. He
never presented a gun or a pistol at me before. I know a
person named Denton. I never snapped a gun or a pistol at
the prisoner ; I am positive of that, for I have a great terror
of using arms incautiously.
Re-examined.—Flockhart has taken the measurements that
I have been examined about.

Flockhart.—The height of the ceiling of the vaults is
ten feet. 1 am a police constable. Was in the prosecutor's
wine vaults on the night in question. The prisoner came in
while I was there, it was then about 23 or 24 minutes to 11
o'clock. He stood near to me, on my left side, he asked for
two pennyworth of rum. I spoke to him, and said " Nathan
how are you ?" He replied Very well." He was sober ;
was dressed in a " down-the-road"* coat, and had both
hands in the pockets. Parkinson was behind the bar at the
time. I said to him " Come on Tim." We having pre-
viously arranged to go out, I then perceived the prisoner
raising a pistol and firing it off, he said, addressing Parkinson,
" That's for you, you b—." Parkinson immediately fell,
and in a few seconds got up, with his two hands to his head,
apparently greatly stunned. I was also stunned. The pri-
soner then retreated about two yards, and pulling another
pistol out of his left hand pocket he came forward, he told me
to stand off, and I retired about two yards. Parkinson was now
withdrawing to "the snug ;" the prisoner was trembling, and
stooping as if to take aim, he fired again. He then said " missed
again," and threw the pistol violently on the floor—so vio-
lently that he broke the cock off it. He put the pistol he
first fired into his left hand pocket. The interval between
the shots was not more than two or three seconds. In fact,
the whole proceeding did not occupy more than a minute.
The vault was at this time-in partial darkness, as the gas had
been put out. I said to the prisoner, " for God's sake don't
fire any more." He said in reply, " stand off, there is more
yet." I then took him into custody and brought him to the
Bridewell. 1 found one pistol in his pocket, and the other
broken on the floor. They had been both recently dis-
charged. The pier glass was broken through at the height of
five feet nine and a half inches. There Was a slight red
mark on the prosecutor's cheek bone. (A plan of the shop,
with the relative distances of the parties, and the places
which the balls perforated, was here submitted to the court ;
the pier glass was also produced.) The prosecutor was about
four feet from the prisoner when the first shot was fired. I
found the ball behind the glass. It was flattened. It would
fit the pistol which I took from the prisoner, and which I
now produce. The ball of the second pistol that was fired,
struck the ceiling within four inches of the wall, and after
passing through the ceiling struck the wall six inches above
the floor of the apartment over the vaults. This (the second)
ball must have passed 12 or 15 inches above the prosecutor's
head. It would also fit the pistols taken from the prisoner.
Cross-examined by Mr. MURPHY.—Booth (the prisoner)
stood in about the same position when he tired both shots,
but on the second shot, Parkinson was about five feet dis-
tant. He was nearer the wall at the firing of the second
shot than of the first one. I am a constable, and am very
intimate with Parkinson. The prisoner appeared to me to be
sober on this night. He stood to my left when he pulled out
the pistol. There were a great many persons in the shop at
the time, all of whom could hear what observations were
made as well as I could. On the first shot being fired the
most of them all fled out of the shop. The distance between
the upper edge of the pier glass and the ceiling is four feet
16 inches. When 1 went to seize the prisoner he desired me
to stand back, as he had still more left. This turned out to
be an idle threat, for he had no more to fire. On firing the
second shot, he took the pistol in both hands, and was
trembling very much. He said when he fired it, " missed
again," and then threw it violently on the floor. Charles
Naseby, Smart, and William Richardson was present,
and saw the greater part, if not the whole, of the trans-
action.

Charles Naseby examined by Mr. ARMSTRONG.--I was in
Parkinson's bar on the night in question. I saw the prisoner
there. Parkinson stood opposite to him. I saw him dis-
charge a pistol at Parkinson, which he took out of his right
pocket. From the direction of it, I have no doubt, but that
he aimed it at Parkinson. Parkinson fell on his knee. The
gas was then put partly out. I thought that Parkinson was
on the floor when the second shot was fired. The interval
between the discharging of the pistols was not more than a
second. I was close to the prisoner. After discharging the
second pistol, he said he would shoot any one who would at-
tempt to arrest him. He was ultimately secured by Flock-
hart. I saw the hole that the ball made in the pier-glass.
Cross-examined by Mr. MURPHY.----I am positive that not
more than a second elapsed between the two shots. I was
within half a yard of the prisoner all the time, and did not
hear him speak a syllable, till he talked about being arrested.
It was impossible for any one to hear all that was said, the
noise was so great.
William Richardson.—Am a brushmaker. Was at Par-
kinson's house on Saturday night, the 2d March last. I was
standing between the kitchen and bar, and while on the
lobby heard the report of a pistol. I then went into the bar,
and while going there was a rush of persons made past me
from the bar. I saw the prisoner take a pistol in both his
hands. Parkinson was rising from the floor and proceeding
to the snug. I saw that this shot was aimed at Parkinson.
There was an interval of two seconds between the shot I
heard the report of, and the shot I saw tired.
The case here closed for the prosecution.
Parkinson was recalled•and examined by his LORDSHIP.—
I had a quarrel about 15 months ago with the prisoner. Af-
terwards we became friends. The last quarrel we had was
about the £2O accommodation bill. On the Thursday pre-
vious to the Sunday on which the prisoner called at my house
respecting that bill, he had received an attorney's letter,
threatening legal proceedings, on account of its non-pay-
ment. When he called at my house on the Sunday he was
tipsy, and spoke angrily about the bill. I saw him once be-
tween that and the Saturday of the unfortunate transaction,
on the race-ground, but we did not speak. On the Sunday
he called me names—asked me why I did not take up the
bill ; why not pay the bill, but he made no threats to in-
jure me.

- Mr. MURPHY then rose to address the jury on behalf of
the prisoner, and commenced by expressing the great difficulty
he laboured under, arising from the prejudices which many
allow themselves to be influenced by, who, considering only
the surface of things, and not deliberately examining into
and weighing the motives that govern human actions, become
alienated from one placed in a situation similar to that of the
prisoner at the bar; but he was sure that the evidence that
had been produced, would, at all events, satisfy the jury,
that he had no previous intention to commit the crime laid to
his charge. In order to arrive at a just conclusion on this
point, they should look to the motives that govern human
actions, and then endeavour to ascertain what could have
induced him to act as he had done. Thus they would be
enabled to judge whether it was an idle act done without any
criminal intent; or if he did it, with a criminal intent, then
they would look whether any adequate motive existed to
influence him td the commission of such an offence. Not one
circumstance had transpired during the long and intimate
acquaintance of the prosecutor and the prisoner—not a
syllable of evidence had. been given to show the slightest pro-
vocation for the prisoner to commit this violent act of
aggression on the prosecutor. There was one striking
observation in this case—generally speaking, where a dispute
arises respecting pecuniary transactions, under circumstances
similar to that now under consideration, the parties are in the
reverse situation to what they 'are at present; for the lender
being generally the injured person, so harrasses and annoys the
party who is placed under the pecuniary obligation, and who
is unable to extricate himself from the difficulty, as to drive
him to the extreme of despair. But he would ask what
motives as to pecuniary want were then to stimulate the
prisoner to the perpetration of this violence? They had it in
evidence, and the prosecutor has acknowledged it, that -the
prisoner had frequently done him very important acts of
kindness; they had it in evidence that he is a cabinet-maker;
was in good circumstances—they could not, therefore, sup-
pose that the matter of a 1:20 bill could have induced him to
commit this act of violence. Where then can be found an
adequate moti re for such conduct? It was not the case of an
importunate and needy creditor driving a debtor to despera-
tion. They are brothers-in-law; and it appeared that the
prisoner had, by a continued series of good actions, evinced
his friendship spontaneously and generously towards the
prosecutor, and at a time when it was essential to his interest
to receive such assistance. In fact, it appeared that their
recent quarrel resulted from a. renewed act of the prisoner's
bounty. Mr. M. then enlarged upon the various acts of
kindness performed by the prisoner to the prosecutor, and
said it was impossible to show—he defied any one to suggest

* This is the witness's name for those fashionable pilot
coats that have the. pockets in the front to? convenience, as if
the wearers were all expectant turnpike collectors,

any malicious—any assignable motive for the prisoner's We'
duct. He called upon the jury then to consider whether there
was any thing in the statements that had been submitted to
them, that could correspond with and account for the stralese
behaviour of the prisoner on the night in question. I°
first place, he called their attention to the evidence of Flele A,
.
hart, the .police constable, on which he commented Floc,
much severity, and he expressed his great surprise
that he
alone, of all who were examined, heard that opprobious .
servation which he imputed to the prisoner when he fir
ea
the second shot; but he (Mr. M.) saidhe ought not to be
surprised, for he had often remarked when a case was at all
defective; and although nine or ten respectable witnesses
his
were examined, and it still required a little colouring! ~
short experience enabled him to say, and this day's proce!.at
ings convinced him of the accuracy of the observation-03
a constable is always ready to supply the deficiency. In NI!:
elusion, Mr. M. said he would be able to show that
prisoner was in the habit of snapping fire-arms at people,
from jocularity, and without intending any personal harms'
He also maintained, that from the position of the
parties,
from the places which tne balls perforated, and from the
elevation at which he fired, he could have no design of firing
at Mr. Parkinson.
Joseph Darton.—l keep a public-house in Stanley-street'
in this borough. I had a gun hanging over the chirnneY.i
piece in my room. The prisoner has at many times talte!ia
down, and pointed it at me. I told him to lay it down; 3"
on examining it, I found it was loaded. I drew the charge'
and showing it to him, I said, there, now, you might I'3°
shot me." This occurred about two years and a half a;0
before Parkinson got into business, they came to my bong,,
and were skylarking one day. Parkinson took down the gra
and snapped it at the prisoner. I have been aerluahl cc'
with the prisoner since the year 1818. He is a charitable a
humane man, and always bore a good character. I c°°
never suspect him capable of doing hurt to any one.
Cross-examined by Mr. ARMSTRONG.—I was at Parka',
son's house on the Sunday previous to the 2d March-,n
went with the prisoner, as he was determined to tell the pro`.
secutor about the £2O bill being due and unpaid. lor to
on my oath say , that I did not tell e Parkinson that f.
take care of Booth, as he was likely to do him some mism:ne
I did say that Booth was tipsy—that he felt annoyed at It,
bill, and I told Parkinson to go out of the way, as he (Bno°l
was greatly irritated. 1
Hannah Mason.—l reside near the prisoner's hove., n
recollect Saturday, the2d March last—he came into my
to 5
about half-past eight in the evening. He had a pair of 4,i's
in his pocket, which he took out, and held before me. I ill:
to the door and got out of the shop, to escape from him-'
called me in, and said there was nothing in the pistols to 131,
harm to me or any body else. He then put' them in 111,,
packet—he looked wild and furious as if he had a little drill'
He always bore a good character—he lives a quarter o!.t_l
mile off my residence. I never heard anything against loos
peaceableness of conduct. I don't know what he is whe

drunk.
William Williams,—l am a hairdresser. I recollect the
prisoner calling upon me on the Sunday morning previOlis
the 2d March, to get himself shaved—be had two joist°le
...;
with him then. He was always jocular, and he pointed them
at me. I said I did not like to have them pointed at tae, P
they might be loaded. He said there was nothing in theui
to do me any harm.
By his, LORDSHIP.—He was not drunk then..
he
Catharine Oyer—servant to the prisoner, , stated that t
pistols produced had been lying carelessly about the house I"°r
at least three months to her knowledge—one was under tile
bed she slept in—the other in a drawer.
The following, amongst a number of witnesses, who were
in court for the same purpose, were examined as to the chai
rioter of the prisoner, viz. Messrs. Stephen Jones, Riehar
Picking, William Rutter, Thomas Stretch, James Grattlt'
Evan Ellis, Henry Spencer, Richard Rimmer, David Priest'
and Robert Crye—they all were intimately acquainted Wi
him—some for eight, others others for twelve and thirteen
years ; and they described him as a humane, kindhearted,
peaceable, and charitable man • he was the first in his neigs-
bourhood to relieve distress, and in consequence of his gene-
rosity,t he was very frequently imposed upon. In answer
11
a question by the Judge, Mr. Jones said—he (the prione a
was not often tipsy, but when he was so, he was hot, whe
aggravated.
Mr. ARMSTRONG, in reply, stated he did not dispute the
previous good character of the prisoner—he fully admit cr„,
all that had been stated in his favour, but this circumstall
rendered it the more to be regretted, hat a man bearing stleat
a reputation for humanity, charity, and general good conch'
should have placed himself in his present unfortunate situi';
tion.. As to the argument of the learned counsel, that
adequate or assignable motive could be suggested for the
prisoner's violent behaviour ; he begged to state that it was
not necessary to show a malicious intent ; for where a 01
fires a loaded pistol at another, the law supplies the itit6eld
But, independent of this, the evidence of the witnesses, qe
the language of the prisoner himself when he missed t"
second shot, placed that matter beyond all question. in 05
port of this view of the case, the learnedgentleman reviesch,
the evidence at considerable length, and, in conclusion, Ow
mitted to the jury, that they could not by possibility enter
tain any doubt whatever as to. the _criminal intention of th
prisoner at the bar, when he fired two loaded pistols, in 80C/,.e
/
cession, at, the prosecutor.
CO"After a lucid charge from the learned judge, the juryo
suited for a few minutes, and without leaving the 10'
returned a verdict of guilty.
His Lordship deferred passing sentencetill Monday in°ll/.
ing. -
The court then (six o'clock) adjourned..

NISI PRIUS COURT.—SATURDAY.
Baron Alderson took his seat on the bench at 9 COURT.—SATURDAY.,
GISBORNE V. HART. MT.
In this case Mr. Martin appeared for the plaintiff, and
Cresswell for the defendant.
Mr. MARTIN stated, that this was a cause which had Pre;
viously been before the court, and had been referred t°4
gentleman of the bar, Mr. J. S. Turner Greene, with P°A.,"c
e
over the costs of the suite to abide with the decision. Ja7r
case was one of debt. On the 30th of June last the baraisi;e_
gave in his award, that there was due to the defendant te. ,
sum of £22 Ils. 9d., together with costs. To this the defei`,
dent pleaded, that the barrister had not given hisawar'! d.
writing. That was the issue which would have to be tries
There was also a demurrer. The plaintiff, Mr. Thoe4lso
Gisborne, was. a gentleman, in Derbyshire, who had-ie.ka
possession a promissory note made by the defendent. ale
action was brought for the recovery of the amount of u_,,,
promissory note, and„ when the cause came on for trial. that
were some circumstances arose which made it necessary 1.1.4;
the defendant should be examined. As that exarainatat,!..
could not take place in court, the case was referred to a ;1,
tration, to allow the defendant an opportunity of being e";
atnined. The award of the arbitrator was made, and, ,r
persons not accustomed to the law, nothing could be plael—
the award.
The rule of the court and the award were then read,e.,,cl
put in. The latter document was proved by Joseph v'''''
Abbott, the attesting witness.
-Mr. CRESSWELL argued, that his learned friend had tiii°et
proved his case. The averment in the declaration, that to,
award was made of and concerning the premises, WaS, 'lO
sufficient : it ought to have been shown, that the award ",16
of and concerning the matters at issue in that case. It P°
not been shown, however, what the matters in dispute we!eh;
and he contended, that they ought to have been made ".
subject of evidence.
that
The learned JUDGE remarked, that it seemed to him.
a,
certain case had been referred to a gentleman for arbits;
tion • he had made an award of and concerning that said eil
and he, therefore, thought, that the issue had been laFerew
He should give the counsel leave to move, that a verdict ,
the plaintiff should be taken on that issue.' The inconyere,
ence arose from not having first had the hearing of the ~,
murrer. He must leave the case for a new trial, the dam"'
to be contingent on the demurrer. .
then
A verdict for the plaintiff, for £lO4 12s. 9d., was
allowed to be recorded.
DOE DEM HAWORTH AND ANOTHER V. LIOLME AS°
ANOTHER.
This was a case of ejectment. Mr. Cresswell and )tri
Wightman appeared for the plaintiffs ; and Mr. Serge°
Atcherley for the defendants.
'
The Plaintiffs, Samuel Haworth and Susan }lora IVa
sought to recover from the defendants, Samuel HohneXh
James Hornby, possession of two cottages at Radcliffe, 01',,,r,
had been leased from Earl Grey de Wilton, by John Wah‘qi.",i.
in the year 1792, for the term of 99 years. John Ws' p-S
died in 1814, having, in his will, bequeathed the two cottag-i
to his son, Peter Walker, to have and to hold the same, 3130
the heirs of his body during the term of the said lease. re
the 3d of January, 1817, the two cottages in question we
mortgaged by Peter Walker to Michael Hornby, the bus,
band of the plaintiff, Susan Hornby.
Verdict for the plaintiffs.
CONSTABLE V MARPLE.
1. CO'
This was an action brought by the plaintiff, Josep a.,,,,
stable, the keeper of a public-house, in Portland-street, ,010 a
chester, to recover from the plaintiff the value of goods F°
and delivered, together with moneys lent. rf
Mr. WIGHTMAN said, that the issue in this case wasiac
short one, because the only question to be tried was, wi'e,eh t•
a'"ccia
the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff. and then to as.'
tain the amount of that debt. The plaintiff was a publiler,
residing in Manchester, a very respectable man, and theft,
fendant was a young man, who either had, or was repate'.'es
have, avt ry good income. The latter came to the plaintia4
house in the early part of the month of May, 1838, and st „
there till the month of July, in the same year, not only o'o,
Uniting refreshments for himself, but for his friends, scb°,st
he very frequently brought to the house. The bill agal:o
him amounted to some £33 or £34. The accounts had li
_.
kept in the way in which such things usually were at pulea ' ,
houses. The articles ordered were scored up until t; ya
amounted to a sum, and then that sum was transferrea,,t,
the book. The plaintiff had several times shown the account,
to the defendant, and he admitted that they were coo'',
Nothing whatever had been paid. aol
Evidence was produced to show, that the defendant P
,0.(
for the space of nearly three months, lived at the honseiaa
the plaintiff, and that he had been in the habit of treating
friends and acquaintance very liberally. Aisui'l ''
Mr. MARTIN, for the defendant, stated, that be ..„ra
endeavour to prove that the defendant had been seduced,Zal
the house of the plaintiff, where he was almost in a contra -,`
state of intoxication ; and that the question would be, in,'',oal •''
state or extent of drunkenness a man ought to be cousi"'
~..
liable to pay for beer ordered.
_rm
The jury gave a verdict for the plaintiff,—damages' 3•'`."
CLAYTON AND ANOTHER V. WHITLF.Y• IV
This stood No. 7 on the second, or West Derby list.
consent of the parties a verdict of £lll9 ss; was taken-
HADFIELD V. RAMSBOTTOM. for
This was an action to recover compensation in damage",
injuries received through negligent driving. 80'
Mr. Cresswell and Mr. Wightman appeared for the PI
tiff, and Mr. Wilkins for the defence.
' Mr. WIGHTMAN opened the pleadings, and laily
Mr. CRESSWELL stated the case. He said, that the P,,,,a0
tiff, Mr. Henry Kneeshaw Hadfield, was an artist, who gent
lessons in drawing, and on the 10th of October last, he/ ice a'
from Manchester to Bury, to give lessons in a eche'''. ni' '
' ia- '
there by Mr. Douglas. He returned from Bury in alo re' a
bus, of which the defendant, John Ramsbottom, is tilerafr• c
prietor. The coachman drove very rashly, and, as lie had
C.) thought the jury would think, when the evidence the
been heard, very carelessly, in consequence of whichrarii-
coach was run against a post on the road to which the ,to
pike gate was attached. The concussion was SO great:o to
throw the plaintiff, the coachman, and another pers°ll bar
the road. The plaintiff was very much injured, and, 11 A
fortunately for himself, lost a great quantity of b113°016
lady, who happened to be near, and who knew Mr. Had a the
assisted in conveying him to the tell house, and stanched
for,
blood as well as they were able. A surgeon was cent time plaintiff was conveyed home, and confined for some ii
(about three weeks) and there was a probability, as the
~00..
had been injured, tnat the plaintiff would be liable to 111‘coe
venience for some time. The driver endeavoured to e]li no ~,c
himself by abusing one of his horses, saying., that it 13, at.: . 'i.
mouth. Now, if that were true, it was the fault of ,„,"orla ' i
fendant in not having provided a better horse. The 'a' bell
counsel stated, that an effort at accommodation ha der to t
made, but the parties were unable to agree. In oroisio, , I
avoid the inconvenience and trouble of a law-suit, the gaped
tiff offered to accept £2O as full compensation ; but he road
that the sum which his client ' had been induced, for 4,..
reasons, to offer to take would not be looked upon by tl,friiist
ry as the whole amount to which he was entitled, no
the action had been brought. i'
Evidence of the facts stated was prpduced. alai", '
Mr. WILRINS addressed the jury on behalf of his_ riegli'
contending,.that the accident had not arisen from the time
gent conduct of the driver, but from the plaintiff, at t'ica he,
of the concussion, stooping forward to 'save a dog %.v
wide°
had found, and which he (Mr. W.) supposed was 'l3
for a study.
A th t tber-e The learned JUDGE, in summing np, remarke—, his caa;
was no evidence that the plaintiff hAd such a dog in ef h"
tody at the ti- -- . wanes-

me of the arkilent of the

!Poke- e ,
Lar.
ii.o or the dog irc:f r:',eera lost (as i
25.12TY'
la vy returner
114 Via • thopt,./t Ban cP°
soa;h;°.!r, resichn
the's;
art
c:
.iry of the
11';'... !.erpool to 11
..4,,,k;resswell an
,4,!;z,iltpton arid
01:4 vittsi;wEta.
I ' ep_tile fish cart
410',71tu Manch
ilri4_,.of cows fr
wh,
,oet the cart h
i tu., eame out,
totke L'e driver to
tor, this, and
the :i°enec was, ti
thitt6l4le or the cow,
tire ,4,e bowels prot
:,,,4,,.,e wonttl stiff,
° COeui'
11:11i!i. a.faxsf
tripe:
t 4 e ItnioUnt of
f,oae'd'Zel. to. ;e7 2s.
C')' the ti_t!a‘ been ,
1,,
...,, taihtiff s attc
"_,.tr was retur
k id tH•ndant first 1
5...,
Itaro„d
.i,ne. Gth oi
:, :31it'jlt4:::dttl'se::':clIttl;t1:)(+.eellIEts4tt°1):itelnhalciliSli'aoftta-fhtastha-11 the c, "telent of ail
• talh, ord- °f hostilitv
_.
i, der
for the]
] 1,,,,i ‘.4e,tes were ex.
thatligt6beet inflicted
0:4
~.- Cow was in
10i4' t'eo, Ming to hi
heeli. :Lae Witnesse,
kt•Par.,ld for a 3 a set
ia, t, ,-Pom Mr a(
tatton"at, his client cc
• tile,
ciit!,l.lle,aceiden
el.ir,`_q- Piaintift a
strkl, 'nee to show
tit,
~,, the (!ows sever
tenti" `c'Mow that the
trez427,atte.nipt 13.
r,..ettling of
id
likedl, the diffe
ir,a:, irs. Ilin
r.tlei.4e! to this el
tlpp4 tCt,BSWELi i
[ ttlttc2 evidee klreals he chncara.c
1 roe
,o hlattledl-DGi
I l`eal4 illf4 would Cul
filth 1..-, whether th
*hetie,g4te4, ceof the
!-
ii°,).litt,t'o,4ll3-cie4l2l..:l)e!llkit:l4l:eeertitaPtl
elle:ll:I half al CI
.ivi
Iht'Agthat ~. -
if they considered Eatll,°nght that
Tilialet
4se las tor thted e plb aait
;11l thisket(tre ekSe the ph
their
,8 which he - I
had :clue, or hav:etl
k kt osle,ll. from („ Iv
llot t 404 e.lailn on the
i: Btteed jolrnto, the pal
efer the
I Iver ni'
1 4 this . ntRELL
4/1,1 w
kcase the pl
Nseol, ,i.teunv, coact
Irt:e'e 8441 of Xi
kld '-'1.:81vell and
hl r.
a
k i:,"}1111,1 hay is
kid 1',.. ~'-ktssA-FL
claiiii ''"ch thou ' I I.
I
mtlehN,
e.,6. 4 1 i6i(cii
,f" if ih:Tis 2f great c,
i,.utio(lB-,''e,ehdant st
Propei,t 'or which the
*. Ottlcf°,l,rB, in future
:!Atlisi,,e4 no mode o
""e4t or 11.1°Cle of fil:
klettai railroads as
toar.Le to the inte' e
11,11irioo 3.11.041 the r 8
to'' till tl) theal as th,
till Periodical ac( elith,,ll° 84ch
,- It„. „
„tt,_ neces
'' Cl. 4 'en the par
Jtitht .- lttlifficient to
Nell 14 that court:
Pillika',Bl3ttie few _
1447: The Llo raal.
„0 , 4,,,,
~., etor,
`.‘,l toki;l, been the
:k'tii,l:!l:4liitititkllqioliLl:e.aevi.:lo4lll3o:ll:dillio:eT,f4:".tt:heo-4!eprg's.:OS:oarsrt.
(.sthi:ll!prltedtkit.te.:4,ll4lll3l:t:7::ll:l;isCo.tirrrlitrrs:
11401 /1(1InK th I'
4,, v*lti,4
,?, whethei
ttic?t,..,fp4;zit it by i-
k taehe bot,!_e_rtY for th
to ok
_.'..ea or th
,_ten..,providig I
! 41„IN, ti,,N account.
ertting
t'll6olley recei
tjt,,ed
the elpenses
itr't,
cl,rY should
, ,tat
„portioned t
li,tatt.4tet4e coach. '.
t;:Bt4ti 1:/:, Bte- thro,
kj,Y month another
toiluotttlit4 fr or six '
ti,,
cit
e_o,4 each
4.4,11,',. by it,42.!k Was sae'
tc,a;Atit'C'srtas•
ill, c
, aod !,wnote r(
thayorto,,
failtle arnou
[ tok4". Thee dist
t 't'li tt the arm
Irik
41,ained, if c
tscd,er,:tt't4ol,lother less
tekt,l,tle., 114 y over
t, ~„ 0 that au
i,7l,,!liviti(l)t, learned
!k,,,, ark,
~4ad.agree
1„ ~
titlet Zie (Lstanc
thc
ti,4qeauant 1
k..tbkh ti_sortner (
lib thtalf Period 1
tk.,._ t,,,
.._ Period .
k '4dl 4de D '')gh'g or P
,„), er three
t,, tki
tone recovere
ritei,fat to:Pay it,
with
(4120(1 th,, 40 with .
4t,4
j,,l], it ~,,a, ,
ii4,l:t.ltis "..1 Ilotint
G ' (44 "re not p
Is 441 e clerk -
11, e tie - of ti
'4 tiqt le,t4. Kehl
ke etv .
iter'urits as so E
thi;'4,.. . A _ R hich 111
`hie.4XAN-DER
weie
th tut c(
Itt,':, Q,,,etoseires, i
akhr,ssBvvslia, 14::','. At? to ascert
t,-44. J.'Ll til„AnLit 14n4,„ ' court, th,
air -Of th ,
, ,t,.. . e la,
11,11., t, (:,,ation oft
] it ,; kitttkuvxu. ,
~' 4ett,:fl4Nv migi
it. j r that th
Ptt . loot h„.. e
q. 4. , rei,iopoEt
tr 4 k Vill*`,..ll:lg tO the
'4),,,tti,'4lt. 'nal('
otree Y arhitr
Ititt4 tihter()oristont
~. 'iklltttt':4:l3et:tie4:l3'43,._ift4leh:eas4lll't ti
:tl.'i '1
:ailir :
t!'hi,;, bp ~2 was cat
iha ,to tz_Ltasel,
q 4 L'So44: /node .„
:14:::::41::,/*::el:eloill; ni)tectt:ejt:o4l:str°h:e.Ghls'
li tatetliversatioi
tlt,li; ta 1111 u t ?.t we
I,ltlltto:,!..,4lllitc.'illol
t ;4; ' 71;44, oOnsto-.
41'1,t,. th,t"tratety
v!Y WA:Vareee°'
wo.
t:i!. e 4, -4(.1n '
rs4.t
~,. ,s
'4°.ktsti li,-,-(Jouroi
-40oday ,
ts4t,) ,
t 04 141.1./1 N cox
'..N l'iet 1..11c AND
'l,* ttr •qi/ter .
ii, et,4_,A, ki agl
11f44, l''ltteduie)(l allc
to, lord Itt r,t3 Y I?r,
04,, silip CO of tt
'4,1:110414,:!!, %eted
414.. i.) % 47-4' A I
11,4s.Itri: 'Wane
tl,.t. Z th, 8:, I ar
~] tyiarkiw:ai, k ,41 ? ct(
't,)l 444° th:tbct "
14,114 illtllitllle t
k4,l,4lklkft, rya be
hi. titl!lta I.
ett P 4,,,. °,4pon.
~. , 4„,, 4. near,
i 1.1,; It "ip
it'll'''. wag
iia stair:
toe I I•tqo 4*e -
k,
tql . 41. 1 tit to
5-;`,1,14 t4i.atici ..cliarg]
th„thr, furl
~.,.!I,you 1
i‘: NI; tkae. s .rte eat
4.041 ite tq Y tf!ti )
`Itif:(;) °lt?4* J
ii]i` I 4-'iltql i He
h,'tt tv )%,,: okd Nbliki:il the blade `t
t'''iltbt;ii-oct"'rsott W'flaa4el;ot
'''''e 't %Pi ' ea'roe to
f'isc,... (A4v,(l)le• I fi r'' -rile
-otrkt 8
1 Ptll4`tll,„_43llirletlTly
''t ZTI I.irllN'l thee qq,..t Arsons • -
t' l'r • "
it', t4t, hsrs
c,f
etso
S't;i, klit']lt I stisr * • 1
Ifi.Nili. Ylll 414'3 In.
I, A
„. lig. ~_ltst c
.I'it,iiitt,.4.e, 74417 we,
~, Att 1. 4 Vra
us. \v. Rot ti,
"t4i.l•4* left Llll' *hatl'E
ItT, '• 11ald r 0
tq '4' ill I.lad k rri
hie4ll' antr!cil he cat,
kitrqd. ,4114 wife vtli.;
lie tt' It It
I.VOS 811(
4'4 'l''kekie 14 1 .
i tl,, to hi 115
, . 54,1.
,5 Con.
ir 44 With th'
(4 1.,,.... is,
7' Pae"

liez3'
iegy
tinle
11
ae-