Star.
London, England, 1828-10-27 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Campeau, OCT. 55.
Before Lord Tarragona and a Special Jury.
LONGMAN AND CO. U. POLK AND CO.
Sir JAMES SCARLIITT (with whom were Messrs.
BROUGHAM and CAMPJELL), stated that this action was
brought by the partners in the house of. Longman and
Co. who were so well known as eminent booksellers,
tarrying on business in Paternoster-row, against the
five partners in the banking house of Sir Peter Pole and
Co. to recover a sum of about 19,0(X/. which the plain.
tiffs bad lost by the misconduct of the bankers, who, it
was alleged, had conspired with Mr. Thomas Hurst.
who, in 1823, was one of the partners of the house of
Longman and Co.'to deceive the other partners of the
house. There might be many wrongs for which it
might be difficult to find a remedy in law; but still there
was a maxim of law that there was no wrong without a
reined) ; and he would, in the first place, lay before the
Jury the wrong which the plaintiffs had sustained,
and then it would be to be considered whether, in
some way or other, they might not find some redress.
For many years previous to the year 1825, the plaintiffs
had been connected in pattnership.vrith a Gentleman of
the oaase of Thomas Hurst, who, about that time, coo•
nected himself with a firm of John Hurst (Thomas's
brothel) and Robinson, who were printsellers—a busi-
neso.not exact VibeVibe same with that of the plaintiffs, but
they had alba joined with Mr. Constable in the publica-
tion of the. works of the celebrated author of Waverley.
Hurst and Robinson, however, traded beyond their
capital, and in 1826 they stopped payment. Some time
before that period they were hard pressed, and bad oc
casion to avail themselves of the credit of Mr. Thomas
Hurst to a great amount. Thomas Hurst did give them
the benefit of biscredit to an extent of which the other'
parties jit 'We houie of Longman and Co. bad no con-
cepttent.,.. They did know, certainly, that be bad a
coopection with the house of Hurst, Robinson; and Co.
butthey were entirely ignorant of his having involved
himself with that house so deeply. The house of Long.
man and Co. employed the defesdants as their bankers,
and,with them Thomas Hurst.discounted bills to a great
amount forthe use of the firm of Hurst, Robinson, ad
Ca and in this way the bankers accommodated him to
the extent of 60,0001. The bankers kept a passbook,
in Which they entered all the acceptances which they
paid for the Messrs. Longman, and this book they
regtilarly sent to the house of X.Angman and Co. whose
clerk or:cashier entered the sums in another pass-book,
kept: by _themselves, which was intended to form a
check on the bankers' Pass-book. Under these cir-
cumstances, Mr. Thomas Hurst applied to the cashier,
a Mt. Angus, and requested that he would not enter in
the check-book certain sums .which appeared in the
pass book of the bankers; and as Mr.Thdmas Hurst was
a principal partner in the house,. the clerk or cashier did
not like to mime' and he complied in some instances,
but at length he declined to comply with this anode of
doing business without the authority of the rest of the
parthefit; btu at the same time he never knew that there
was 'the least wrong done, or intended to be done, by
Mr. Hurst. Upon this Mr. Thomas Hurst adopted
another plan. Having accepted bills without the know,
ledge of his partners, probably to support the gran. of
Hutu, Robinson, and Co. payable at the banking house
of the defendants, he seat the cash to meet these bills
. when they became due; and it would be proved to them
that Mr. Down., one f the partners in the banking
house, informe'd- the clearing .clerk, at different times,
that bills'signed by Hurst for the partnership, were.to
t woe in for payment at the time specified, and that be
was to pay these bills, but nut p enter the transaction
in tt.ar usual way in the pass-book sent to the house, of
Longman and Cu. but to eater it in a note-book to the
private acumen of Mr. Hurst.. This the clerk did in
three instances, which could be proved ; one, in the case
of two separate bills for 2,500/. each, and soother in the
case of a bill for 1,6001 and having paid the bills be
entered them in the note-book as directed, and not in
the pass-book, and delivered the bills to Down., so that
by this means these transactions were effectually kept
from the knowledge of the other partners in the house
of Longman end Cn. One of these bills, draw* at a
long date, by a person of the name of Gilmenon, and
accet ted by Hurst for the .film. of Longman and Co.
got into the hands of a brokerpf tho came of Bruce, for
the Fiprpilie of being discounted, and he baying some
ausp!cion about the signature, applied at the banking!.
house of the defendants, and inquired .about it, and
dietetic was informed that it was certainly 'the signs- I
tote of Mr, Thomas Hurst, and that the bill was a good
one. The broker then got it discounted by the firm
of Herring, Barclay, • and Co. who paid it into the
banking-house of Barclay and Co. bankers, who pre-
sented it. at the banking-house of the defendants, where
it wait past and entered, as he had before mentioned.—
The object of all. this was obvious; for if these trans-,
actions had been entered in the pass-book, in the usual
way, the practice of Mr. Hurst would have been disco-
vet byhis partners, and his credit would be destroyed
or injured; and it was a groat object with the defend.
ants to keep op that OM^ mica they bad discounted

such a large sum as 60001. The bill for 1,600/. was
'presented at the defendant's house for payment, by a
tler k of the Batik of England,le November 1825, and
that was not entered in the pass-book of the house of the
plaintiffs, but entered only in note books, to the mime.
sccount ((Hurst. The third bill was 'presented mach
about the same period, but not entered in the pass-
book. About that period Mr. Hurst desired to with-
draw part of his capital from the concern of Metals.
L Ingman and Co. and 10,0001. of it was paid to him.
and soon after he desired to have it withdrawn alto.
gel et ; and accordingly, besides the 10,0001 a sum of
34000/. was paid to him; and the Jury would observe
that this took place at the very time when Mr. Hurst
and the defendants wee thus studiously concealing
Ithese transactions from the knowledge of Hurst's part.
nets. They, never dreaming of such practices, had
paid 47,0006 out to Mr. }bust, and never discovered it
till the house of Hurst, Robinson, and Co. became bank-
rupts, in the beginning of January, 1826, and Thomas
Hurst, who bad joined that hr•use.had become a bank-
rupt along with them; and it was then discovered that
Thomas Hurst had accepted 19,0001. in the name of
the firm, of which they knew nothing, bat which they
were compelled to pay, alter Hurst bad withdrawn his
capital, and rendered it impossible for them to avail
themselves of that in their own exoneration. They saw

then how the matter stood. The defendants had a deep
interest in the preservation of the credit of Thomas
Hurst, and, when they were aware of this, they would
easily understand they had entered into this•conspiraor
with him to conceal his transactions from his partners.
They had discounted for him the amount of. sixty thou.
sand pounds, a sum which they might lute unless the
credit of Hurst were continued. In eotibequence of
this proceeding on the part of the defendants, the plain.
tiffs bad lost 19,000 a loss which they would have
avoided had it not been for this fraudulent conspitacy ;
and this was the sum which they ow s pug! tto recover
from the defendants ; and the question was, whetter,
when bankers lent themselves to one of the partners oil
a firsts to conceal his malpractices from the other pail-.
nets, they we, e to compensate in damages tot whatevii
loss might ensue, more 'especially it they so lent their
selves, not merely by acquiescence, but by positive in:
tavtation to prevent discovery ? He did Dot carry
his morality so far as to say that bankers were in
every case bound to communicate the frauds of one
partner to the rest but in this case they would ob.
WV. that the communication was withheld from it
corrupt motive, or at least it would be for them to say,
whether it qai so or not ? The" proposition then
this, that the bankers were bound to deal fairly and
honestly by their customers, and not to lend themselves
to one of the paitnas of a firm to enable 'Mm to de-
,ctive and to defraud the rest. There might be cases, on. I
doubted'', where bairkers would be justified in agree-
ing to put transactions of this mimic to the private
laccount of a single partner, when they had no reason
to believe that any fraud was intended. For illusive,
if Mr. Alexander Baring were to g 9 to the bankers of
his firm and say that he wish", a pastnersiiip transia
lion to be put to his private account, for reasons which
he.did not choose to mention, the bankeri would be
completely justified in doing so, (or then they would
have every reason to believe. that nothing wrong was
intended. But here there was strong town to believe-
that Mr. Thomas Hurst was doing wises, and that
the defendants had assisted merely to support his credit,
which was an object of great consequence to thew, who's'
had discouutcd for him to such. a large amount,, and
they were bound to make compensatioa.rn dainageitri
the plaintiffs .for the loss which they had sustained'
through the misconduct of the defeedatits:.
A nontber of witnesses, principallg chits in the house'
of the plaiutiffs end the bank of thi'defendants, were
then examined, and proved the care as stated by Sir
James Scarlett; after which •

Mr. Roberts, the hanky!' las examiited, and stated
that it was the invariable rule in his boas, to enter Abe
hills accepted by a partnership in a pass-bOok of the
partnership. To enter them in the private account of
goo of thepartners, was what he would not have allowed
on any consideration.
Mr. Guilin addressed the Jury for the defendants..
Irhe.plaiotiffs, be said, had the modesty to charge the
Whole five partners of this most respectable (though at
aN time unfortunate) banking-house with fiend and
eoirspiracy : though they had not given a tittle of
evidence, swept as .regarded Mr. Downe, set they
bad the hardihood to charge them all with having
••_ aged is wicked conspiracy with Horst, to de-
fraud the plaintiffs, He, however. was at no loss
to defend Mr. Downe. Mr. Thomas Hortt wag
universally believed to be a most respectable and
opulent man, and it was known, that be was a prin.
cipal partner in the house of Longman and Co. with a
capital of 47.0001. in that establishment; and then,
because he deceived both his partners and their bankets,
Mr. Downe was to be charged with conspiracy;
because, at.the instance of Hurst, he had been lid into
a little irregularity. Though a pass-book was sent hoer
the bankers, the plaintiffs never appealed to have looker(
into it ; and even Mr. Browne, the piuther who had the
management of the cash, looked only it the check.
book ; and though SB,OOOl. were entered in the pass--
book, as paid tor bills with which they say they had
nothing to do, they never noticed it. The plaintiffs
subtitled no injury, from the circumstance of the.
bills, respecting which they had given evidence; not
baying passed through .the pats-hook, as it was evi•
dent they would not have teen the entries if they hid
been entered. And if they sustained no injury they
could recover no damages. He was not there to defend
Aura, lust perhaps if be were •broight forward he
might have something to say tee- hiinself.' .The Jury
would consider that Hurst, at the time,• wa' a man in•
high credit and of great consideration; and Mr. Downe
bad no ideethat his object was to conceal any t hingfro m
his partners. Mr. Downe naturally thought that the
design was to conceal the extent of that sort of dealing
front the clerks of the house. This was the natural
explanation of the conduct of- Mr. Dowse, who acted
not from a bad motive, bat a good one.
Lord TENTXIIDEW recapitulated the evidence to the
Jnryrand said, that is• order to find all or any of the
plalotiffs liable, they must be of opinion, both that the
defendants had acted from a corrupt motive, and that
the plaintiffs sustained damage from their so doing.
The Jury in a few minutes retuned P i'etdiet for the
defendants.

• A French physician is said to have discovered that
whites of eggs and powdered.wbite sugar Is a remedy (or poison-
ous mushroom)* and mbar deadly vegetables..
UXBIUDO/St OCT. 25.—A robbery' to a considerable
extent was committed on Tuesday night, or early on
Wednesday morning, by some thieves effecting. an en.
'trance at the, back of the mansion of C. CLowas, Esq.
at Leer, which they did by boring out a pannet of the
back door. Having thus obtaiped the whole range of
the basement story, they assuaged to clear the rooms of
Iflate, to inkets,&c. &c. to a large amount, without dig:,
orbiai the imams or Wog discoVildoiod d.at.aftipo,
with their booty.

'PROW

SURREY SESSIONS, 04;usea 25.
1101111111WHIPPISO A YOUNG LADY.: •
Mr: jokes Uciih. of IV artter-streti, it/is indicted for ,
basting committed a violent assault bison Mist Elie*
alackbeen,i young Lady, thedaughter of if hie* fe•
spectabk inhabitant of the same street: The .defe'ndint
*Asa short time ago before the Magistrates at Vision
Hall, *hen he endeavoured to compromise the matter
it appeared that the defendant having tea offended at
.Gentleman who was in Mr. Blackburn's house, having
nodded to one of his (lefenilanti) datightersdeter.,
mined to be revenged on the first person Who came out
of the house. The first pet son whnsii he chanted to see
*as the prosecntrix,., and he instantly applied a hoist-'
whip memos her shoulders and tieck. Which were eoiered
with mar ks,and she was in consequence Confined to the
house several days. -
Found Guilty, and sentenced to Pty. a fine of SOS.
_ . .
MIDDLESEX SESSiOilt. Oce. 2S.

James Henry Prince, who has recently filled the :iter-
ation of master in a parochial school. was indicted for
indeceat conduct towards Eliaabath Briant. a girl of
14 years of age. The protecutrix, a well-looking little
girl, deposed that she belonged to tte above school.
About the beginning of last June; sb was seat by the
mistress of the school for pens and' ihk 10 the boys'
school ; she informed one of the boys what she *ranted.
The prisoner came to her on the landing, and commit-
ted the offence.
The CHAIRMAN stemmed up the evidence, end the
Jury returned a verdict of Gaiky. The priso6er was
committed to the House of Correction for 12 months.

OLD BAILEY SESSIONS, Ocr. 25.

Thomas Moore. aged 16, and John Crisp. aged 17
two young crackstnen," were indicted for breaking and
entering the workhouse belonging to the parish of St
Luke, Middlesex, and stooling divers bags of books and
papers, the property of the guardians of the poor of the
said parish.
The Jury found both the prisoners Guilty-.. Death.
Foitonny—Edward Cooper, alias lioliagdike, aged
forty-four, was indicted for forging and uttering a re-
ceipt for 11. Bs. with intent t,.) defraud the Dowager
Lady NPpeon.
_ _

Mr. Bnomuce stated the cue for the prosecution.
The •prisoner was only indicted fot forging a receipt fir
11.8 s. althoegb be bad at various timer forged to the
amount of more than 601.

The Honourable Harriet Nepean examined—l am
the daughter of Lady Nepean ; the prisoner• was her
Lidyship's coachman. MK Si‘iiike; a corn-factor, sup-
plied her Ladyship with oats, and the money was given
to the prisoner every three wet ks to pay fur witat had
been received. On thesi occasions the prisoner al w a).
produced a receipt. During the twelve months be had
been in her Ladyship's service, these receipts were never
suspected of being forged; but on the 28th of &item.
her .Mr. Swain sent in a bill for corn tor one year. On'
inquiring into the circumstance!, it was discovered that
the prisoner had applied the money tobis own use, and
written the receipts to the bilk himself.
Mr. Swine proved that the receipt to the bill for
11.8 s. now produced, was not in his handwriting, or that
of any one autborizedto sign receipts for him.
The constable who apprehended the. prisoner stated,
that at the time he took himipto custody the prisoner
acknow.ledy,td to him (tge having committed
the offence with which he was charged.; he did it under
the l-ope 1.1" being able to pay As money before it was
discovered. . .
The prisoner, put in a long written defence, in which
be declared he bad no intention of dehaudiag her La•
dysbip; for if be had been so disposed, he could have
done it to a much greater extent. being in the habit of
cowling cash to the bankeir. Whilst this address was
reading, the prisoner burst into tears, and begged the
Jury to have merry on him on account of his wife and
five infant children.
Thedory immediately returned a verdict of Gaily.
Mr. Baron GAIIROW said. h. -would take this oppor.
'unity of mentioning. in hopes it might be made public,
that tradesmen appeared very remiss in not making it
personal application to any Nobleman or Gentleman
when they exceeded their usual time of payment: he
could !wifely say that no Gentletnanowould be offended
by Bach application, but, on the contrary, feel himself
Obliged, as it would prevent the numerous frauds car-
ed on by servants. . .

LO:

[DON SESSIONS; Om 25.

• •
Tablnstitut OF ST. STSFHCS. CCLIIIIAiI.aREST V. ?HS
PARS H 01 ST. OIL'S. RIPPLEOATI.
• This was a contest in which one parish endeavnoelli
'io fix upon the other tie support of a man and his
wife, named Padwick. By the law of settlement, a
person who has slept the 1.4. t 40 nights of his armrest;
acesbip in any parish establishes a settlement. Tier
.officers of St. Giles, Cripplegate, passed them to that'
of St. Stephen, Coleman stieeL, and the latter appealed
against the order.
Padwick bad. during his apprenticeship, which had
not long expired, been in the habit of going to a pub.
lic house in Coleman sneer, where he married the pot:
girl, while yet au Apprentice. His fondness for gel
fiowellerp rev rather than diminished, and at last both
he and the were thown oat of employment.
Mr. BOLLAWD supported the order of removal, sltldl
called the pauper and his wife. They stated that they
had slept forty nights in the public-house. in matrienoey
and that in the very last night of his apprenticeship
they slept there.
Mr. ALUM opposed the order of removal. He des.
nied that the male pauper had slept forty nights intim.
public-house. The fellow was in fact incorrigibey
drunken and idle, and 'it was only oCcationallY the land.
lord allowed him' to lie down in the house; and then it
was because he was toollatuak to go away. It wimid
`be a very • great hardship fer a parish to •be burdened
with an expense, because a landlord happeied. to have
too much Lumanity to turn e tam 'who was not able
to take case of himself, into. the or eitv, IE load, be
probed distinctly that the'oiale paupeii.neveeskopt forW.
nigb:s in the public-house in his lilei--But,elsen if he
had complied with that part of the yegitation, he would
not be entitled to s settlement.: . .
' Mr. BoLLsiten.,, How. will yon•itimithil?:-14
• Mr. Au.ny said; as .the sleeping ice*. pubik.houm
'ersta not referable to his dutiersto his.tnalter,litienteeelg
in, his own entertainment, first for liquor 4d...zit,
M. a bediellOw, the claim wet no more estalatiabed
than If he bad .never slept there at all. Besides, the
pauper was kept the'itierely because be was wispily
enable to rake cafe' of • himself. and thetefore hittl his
.mare right to 'argue his right to a settlement than he
could, tf he was taken to St.l3artholoasew's Hospital for
a broken head, be entitled to a provision (rani/oat parish;
. Mr. BOLLAWD.lidialned OE that soft hf Open wonk
entitle a differyet. sot of settlement—(A
,lergh). • He wateierptiSed µthe immoral tendency 01
Leaned Friend's observations. Sutely the propel

I

person for a married Sall to sleep with alas his (A;
svif.f, whether he happened to be a master er as a,
pientice. As for the objection to the s üblic us, 1:
a placb for sleeping in, he could not at all see the Nit;
.40. that.
Mr. ALLEY called the keeper of the public4sosia
The witness swore that Mr. Padwick never slept it h -4;
house except when he was too tar gone to go say fa,
Cher—(A laugh). Upon. such occasions he was putt
bed. and his wile went to bed to him. of courses beta,
driver was a steady lodger. and never slept in thebal;
forty nights, or any thing like that time.
The Court considered that the claim had been maik
out by she evideoce or the
.two paupers, whom ta,_
considered as perfectly justified in sleeping surati2
Whether they went to bed sober or not. The-atd;l
Was then confirmed.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
timmigs,
myth, OU. !LisrapAp Lretsice•
to a
committed for stealing sown trinkets, value 71. from
attic which hp had to pass &weigh to repair the roof
I. had presumed a pan of the stolen property to hi,
being traced to her possession, she was necinsarr
sworn against him.
dam Gorda% in the employ of Mallow and Co.
Cbsepslde. was also committed for embezzling U. gr.
IS a
charge. assault against Mules Ames, a watchmaa,
laCtzlidolleoen he admitted that he was anent,
Lanais &night it was quite time his services
shodeptee diepeneed with.

Miami Ciiinsomfe, a hackney coachman. was charged
Throsby, afters of the Society for the Prevention
to Animals, with wantonly and cruelly whipping his hers.
Helborn-hill to .Nowiste.etreet, on Tuesday last.—Hp„,
'4l‘oiets; net being able to pay, he was ordered to be
BOW-STREZT.
Nampsamissinsw.-Charke Mild was darted eibb
inebnis mitt simnel received by him on account of
!heart. Plebiord and Co. the carries* and Wharkagers
toed.—Mt. Leingesa, meet the above arm, stated that
bad bees several years in their employ as a collecting
oohed a salary of 2001. a year. It was his duty, daily,
OWniant of all monies he received in the cash-book, and
Minsent over to the cashier the same es. nine. Oa
Aerie he received the Ma of RM. 16s. 6J. from a
wbieh he bad not entered is the cash-book, or in any ,
hr. He was remanded, to give the prosecutors time
thee inquiries.
II A RLBOROUGH-STRERT.
We have already noticed the apprehension of a young
meetly a clerk in the employment of respectable whciturs
atom's 11104w:ids, who endeavoured to destroy a soi.
be bed ineffectually tried to get changed at the b
Usii•wran, in Pall Mall. On Thurso:4 it was dbowerid
this and the other monies he passed were the fruits
Which he had committed in the tame of Messrs. Line
Idesers. Prescot and Co. bankers, to the amount
lige underwent a second examination on Ft Way, and
Ins been brought home to him, be was remanded
aminatinn.
LAMBETH-STREET.
Anise Niclisas was charged with robbing W. Aadersen,
of a trading vessel, of his•watch. Compleineat accompanied
to her lodgings in Him Anchor-yard, lioseniary-lane,
missing the property, be gave bet in charge to a watches
latter stated that while in custody, the prosecutor told tb
if she wouldgive up the watch he would forego the cha
then rapped up a ;wan who resides In the neighbOurlieed,
erred the article, which was given to the proletuter.
The Magistrate reprobated the conduct both of
and the watelissas. observing that the former had comproaSied
felony, dm peaky al vAlsbie transportation for 14 year.'
chided blip from procemilng wise she prisoner. He sh
ewer send her to the Hesse of Correction lot one mouth.

At the late Yo'rkibire Raise Riding Sessions,
Morena Waite, an elderly Lady, worth at least 3.0901.
for cruelly treating a poor child, by besting and putting
bole. for taking a flower oat of her garden. The Lady
sudty, sad sentenced co pay a Am of 40i.
}hue,—Last bight, daring Divine Service,
distoiered in the premises occupied by Mr.
shoemaker, in High-street. Whitechapel,
gained considerable progress, and was threatening
destruction of the arjoining houses, before
of the engines. The fire was however, by the
of the firemep„, confined to the house in which
noted, and in a shot t time wholly subdued, after
destroyed the lower part of the premises.
Yesterday morning a borglaty. accompanied
extreme violence, was committed in the house -
Roisin•or, in Great Ru;sell street, Drury lane.
poirs that between the hours of two and three
Mrs.. Robinson and her daughter, who slept
door. were alarmed., Miss Robiason rose .
Wietchman. but had no sooner got out of bed
fellows, with a dark lanthorn, opened the '
doer one of whom immediately struck Miss .
titside of the bead with A bludgeon, and
• - .
ess to the ground. The villains were e'en
-awards Mrs. Robinson, with the intention,
of inflicting a similmbir4.bass she commenced
ing so violently thatieatius a vines.' alarc
linquished their purpose, and made their meal
burglars. carried away 301. in sovereigns.
was immediately sent for to attend Miss.Robinsos,,
had received considerable injory from the

HICSDONIAD4kIitY.
Tins •Dar—Day decreased 6 hours 40 44044106.•Werip vailt
Raphael, the astrologer of our time, bat sow net, Dar take la hard
any goad this day.
To•rsoaarwr—St. Sawa sad a. Jade. These Wets bilie bees
careimermeated jobtly from the year 1091. whs die feet was is-
sdtutal.—}loliday at the Bask, &e.
Wramasaar—listo rises 6 adh. pest 7.—lihos dose II ado. pot
io at eight.

measoar—liaeg Alfred ask 1100.—.11oes nuts bet Tauter
54 min. past 4 he the thermos.
Faisar—lie blow is apogee.-Bso sits 10 min. before b.
liatusaar —All Seinte.e—The Catholic .Clumeie ate evened to
commemorate all the Sainte sod Martyrs, is boomer ef whom, M.
divklually. so partkular day bag bees aselgsed.—Bort*---
Lisboa, 1755.--Heiday at the Bask, Ike.

At Herefordolls Rev. H.AWS&AII" M. A. of Worcester College,
Word, ran of Hoary Allen. Esq. Ilarrimer on die °mord Omits
to the Hen. Aube Caroline Fitzroy, dater of Lord Southampton.
At Brixton. the Re.. Edwin Profters, B.D. of Trinity Carr.
°decd. to Caroline. daughter of Jan Bade% Km If Stockwell
Ha% Stem.

DIED.
Os Friday, the 24th instant, at her house in Unies•street. Deis*
ford, to the 55th year of her age, Mrs. Ansilrady, widow of Lint.
Brady, IL N. a
At Wince:benne. in the Nth year of his age, Mr. R. Faker,
of Queen's College, Oxford.
The Rev. John Menkhwees, M.L. lemerly Fellow at Qattea
College. Oxford, and Rector of Ibeassiset, in the county of Naws.
Mr. Mackinaw took his Dopes of M.A. in 1716.
The 17th Wt. at Vale-place. librainerienith-road. Lieut.-Gems,
Hart y itablyeed. late of the IMO Engineers. se years.
At lb° Moab a thi Bev. David Drown. in the ltd
year of his age, and 40th
At Jedbergh, of cholera imeebne, two days Mews, Mr.
Adana Hoboes Imes mast:d Hopsbonse, and *any years land
steward tsar Thos. Stanley, tat Heston Hall, Cheiike, aged 56.
In Great- YU:tweet, Ediihwila, in the 53d year of his age. Mr.
Win. Brown, late Rector oldie Royal Grammar Maui, Dunkskt.
Mr. *owes wass a! talents.were of the first order; he excelled as a
classical acholar, and his peculiar faculty of eenuseakating IMMO.
don eminently qualified hint for the itupottant task of a public
teacher. The ability. the &Why, the patience, and the petseves in"
with which be discharged the arduous ditties of his profession, have
seldom been equalled, and never surpassed. lib model worth, he
unobtrusive niannen, hi. profound judgment, his istleatbk integrity.
and his unaireeted piety. towinanded the respect and esteem of
who had the happiness of being acquainted with him,

• HIGH-W4flik at LONDUN-BILIDGI TO-)110kROW. •
Morning 4S =imams attar S
Mutinous . S admits* attar • _

Lonna : Printed and Publiabed by Join Mays; the PrayehOtra
at the STAR Ores, No. I, Pickett-place, Topple Da.

- ...Ft 111 hi
o goalny fut.
64t vtapet is
wit
t in tbilisto
Id bees roggi •
7/11M
II Wheal alb add
intogo4 Nadi
The of*. , on
. •
CAI
.bricklayer% sill
aof a baa
'41111644
Ms sweetkals
iarUy oar at% cA 1
:0. lamas
nehmen, o f k LO
ty yean et ipt,
vices is %gas
barged 11144 CAI
mica at Crway
his Wens freak PA
—1%4 g*
be Stied
YU
ffla wake:dist Bt:
hisesopioyers,
gars in the Qty.
SA
hat the rifles
g alat ra
sily. to enter as
awd to Mill
Oa the
a Crola,
eccomed
ale 10 1144 e
roan( :sae,
siwitsrs
fehlik
house of Ne. it
41,coverai the sbt
rts or a lorry
Lane 414 Crafi. wn
at of ISt 10.
Id the fact hae. be,
roe finder a- toJo
!lei
Warm, Ilvterins
lecompanted k Ito
lane, where MI
ratchrnan. 'l. to
lard rlr,
the mem
he charge. Yes ea'
load, wh0446. mei
W
r. I
r the preemie (eldcompromised a
years, sad pre.
He should haw ar
moth.
sa
mimeo ilbs. of
el. was larked as
tong kin seal fr
Ay was farad V
hr
ce, a fire wss rs
r. Hardwicke ti
, which had at
remains tire
re the arrival fr
the nankin
rhich it origi-
n after ham; a
a
*ponied wick
"use of Si"'
lane. It ap-
three o'clock a
st in the first
to call the
sod than two
he bed room
lies Robinaow
and she -fril
Oen making
sty no dedibto•
nced scream:-
arm. they
m-
escape. The
A surgeon
obinsoa,who
blow.
•,—War, ea&
or take la lewd
Woes kif(ft beta
he fast was
rai It vals. Put
as be lento.
a. before S.
I ate apeod,_"
sr of Idiom. pi-
.sankieake at
rooter Cakr•
Orford Cireits
iligkarepton•
Die*,
1. et iirCdiefe°_,
esclww