Star.
London, England, 1828-06-14 00:00:00

Mr. BARING expressed a with that the wool growers would
bring forward some specific motion on the subject, and not night
after night entertain the House with detultory conversations. lie
did not see how the woo? growers could be protected in the way
they desired•
Mr. BRNETT denied that wool could be properly considered as
a raw material. He could tell the House, that with the reduction i
of the price of &OA 'wool, the manufacture export bid been re•
duced; and the value of rennin stock lands ;Ind fallen in several
couaties full twenty to thirty per cent. in consequence of the lost
price of wool—The Petition was then ordered to be printed• '
Mr, C. GRA NT presented a Petition from the Manufacturers
of a Parish in Scotland against any Duty on Foreign Wool.
Ordered to be printed.
_ Sir M. STEWA RT presented a Petition from Glasgow, praying
assistance towards Emigration to Canada.—Laid on the table.

SMITH trIRLD YAaxaT.
Mr. Alderman W A ITH MAN presented a Petitios Ran cer-
tain inhabitants of Smithfield, against the removal of the, Market.
Sir R. .WILSON said, that the butchers themselves were now
satisfied that great cruelty was daily practised at Smlthfield,ind
they were anxious to enlarge the size of the Market.
Sir C. BURRELL said, that as London had so considerably itt-
creased, a large market should be held at the West End of the
Town. He hoped that Lard Gtosvenor, as a large proprietor of.
had, would give this subject his consideration.—The Petition was'
ordered to be primed.
Mr. It. GORDON moved for the appointment of a Select
Committee to inquire into the present state of Smithfield Market,
and report thereon their observations to the House.
Mr. Alderman WOOD felt bound to oppose the motion, inas-
much as nothing could be done at the present period of the iession.
If, however, It were delayed until next Seaga°. be would then
render every assistance in his power towards the neeersary improve-
ment. Not a single salesman bad signed the Petition in favour of
the removal of the market; none but speculators were concerned
In the matter. He denied that the Corporation of the City of
London were against improvement ; on the contrary, they had no
lees than eight or ten times come before Parliament, praylog for
improvement, yet their prayer had been as often rejected by one
House or the other. He moved, as an amendment, that the further
consideration of the question be deferred till the next &Moo of
Parliament. _ _ _

Slr. BENETT supported the motion. He thought the Session
was not so far advanced but that the House would find the labours

of the Committee useful. •
Mr. Alderman WA IT H \IAN denied that any odium ought to
attach to the City of London on this question—they bad for the
last 20 years made every effort to remedy the evil complained of,
though it happened to turn out so ineffectually. The whole Me-
tropolis was interested in this subject, and be questioned if it were
possible to have slaughter houses kept in a more cleanly state than
they were at present. 'lt was also said that the market was Wed-
qua to health, but the contrary was the fact—Afor it happened that
consumptive people went there to improve their health. The market
was now well regulated, it was superintended by the city officers,
and was in as good a state as it could be. The Osrporationmade-
every-offer to enlarge it, and lee saw no =Trashy For the present
motion. H,wever, any evil which existed he was inclined to re-
medy, but not in the manner now sought—(Cries of Queidiii)--
He knew the was subject uninteresting' to many Gentleman 'but
nevertheless it was Interesting to the public. • • -• ••• e' •
Mr. Secretary PEEL said. that after the admissions matkp 17
the Hon. Alderman, he ought not to object to the apptintlient et
a Committee now, which would greatly facilitate an incydry Mot
the date of the market. He for one Wall ncit prepared to agree tit
the removal of the market, without very =teat consideration, AO I
giving all the parties, interested an opportunity for discussion. .•
Mr. R. GORDON had not the least with to throw &nylons--;
cation on the city of. London ; all be wished was, that a due toquirp
. .
should "recede any Alteration in the market. - . • •
Mr. Alderman ATtINS defended the Corporation of the cilri
if Laden, Who had done all in their power to Improve the costa.
don of the market,
Mr. Ald. THOMPSON resisted the motion on twti
Art, the latenessof the Session, and secondly, that even if theitie.'
of*. market was altered, certain inconveniences must arise (rani
the ?using Of cattle through the streets. •
Strangers were then ordered to withdraw, but no dividon took
place, and the motion was agreed to.
A Message from the Lords Announced their Lordships' &Vel-
ment to the Covent Garden Market /Improvement and other Balls.'
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved that the
House, at its rising, should adjourn to Mooney next—Agreed cc.
Mr. PEEL brought in a Bill for the better Recovery of Small
Detusy—Read a first time, and ordered to be read a second dine
on Monday next.
SAXIL MOTU 090TLAND
Vito CHANCELLOR of. the EXCHEQUER, iw
moving the Order of the Day for the second reading of
the Bank Notes (Scotland and Ireland). Bill, observed,
that he had communicated with some. don. Gentlemen
who were opposed to this measure, and that an arrange-
ment was made, in which he hoped the House would
concur, that the discussion on the Bill should be taken
upon bringing up the Report, and that the Bill should.
.now be read a second time without entering into the
discussion.

•

Mr. PORTMAN said, that not being able to attend
the lase discussion on this subject from indisposition,'
and fearing that he should not be able to attend when
the subject was again bropght forward,. without wish.
ing to enter into any ;discussion -on .the subject, he
wished simply ti enter his protest against the Bill, and
against the principle which his Majesty's Governmentj
sanctioned, bythe suppression of the small note citctis)
lation.. He thought the measure would be injurious
,tp
the landowners, the tradfrs.. and all Classes of persoaski
All he could say :was. .that when, the subject watt
brought forward next Session, as be understood. it was;
likitlf.o be, he sbeisld he reedy to state his opinion at
reaterleigth op. it: He.:mild not interrupt thepablie
business by enteri4loither into the subject at present:
Sir JAMES GRAHAM willingly actioiesceeus;*
arrangement which had been entered into to Ps:wipes
the discussion pistil:oe bringing up of the Report. I
might :tau', IMMO*. that his objection to the principhr:
of the measure remained unabated, and he hoped trier
Report would be brought up early io the evening, to.
admit of a fell discussion. . • , *
Mr. HUME said,, it was his intention on this occasion
to have stated.his.objections io'tbe principle of the Bill,.
and he meant in the Committee in propose 1 clause
obliging every issuer of notes periodically to return, to
the Treasury an account of the number-of -hetes WM*,
by him. , Ito fact, the clause was the same as that which,
he (Mr. Hume).proposed in 1826. ,
The BW was then read a second time, and ordered tube cow:,
mined on Monday next.
SUPPLY.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the
Order of the Day for the House resolving itself into a Committee
of Supply. • -
Colonel DAVIES said, as.it was his intention to move
an Amendment to, the erect that our War establish
meat sluiuld be fixed at what it was in 1823. he wO.lllO
beg to say a few words. It was now well known that:
the Finance ComMittec.did .not mean to recommend
any reduction in the Arosy.Estimaterowd.hence it
.be-
came his duty. to make a few observations on the subject.
He did nikattsichani brain the. Finance Committee
for the course they hat peirsued ; but he thought that.
the evidence on which they acted. was not exactly of
that description Wkich would be most desirable for
.the interestaof the country. .He fixed upon 1522 as
A year of pmeohongk at Olt pale time a year, when
the elliancetnt forelat war were as great as they were
thisat ace 18.0 there had been a'gradnal
'increase of the ails'', and now the increase was above
17,000 moo, at an additional expense of half a million
latnonallic The mops in.lodia were also increased eu
the upsappt , a Ave. thousand, so that in every til•
reitioo went on, without any regard to
ewe diwatoiiliesf revenue. In fact, taking the whole
expend-cure of the.various branches of out military
tand naval service, it amounted, to above two millions
and a half more than in 18224,and if. such expenses
were continued, it would by impquitale, to keep faith;
with the pablie knew very very well thowes..,
rain establishments must bokeit up, cost
might; but then be thought that all necessary establish-
' men is might be maiiitsieed eunuch less eapeissethan
they wet" atputieni. The colonial garrisons onsht. to

~~~._.