Star.
London, England, 1811-11-21 00:00:00

NAVAL APPOINTMENTS.

The lords Com- ----------- of the Admiralty have promoted
Lieutenant Gedge to the rank of Master and Commander, who
recently distinguished himself in the Locust guu-itessel, in an
attack unite enemy's craft off Graveling.
Admiral Sir 1 komas Williams is appointed Commander in
Chief at :•heernees, in !ht., room of Admiral Fir E. H. Stanhope,
and will shortly hoist his ii g tia the Namur, Capt. Austen.
Captain Purvis is appoinkd to the Gauymede; Captain Hoste,
to the Bacchante; Captain Mouncey,-to the Furietpte ; 'Captain
Joyce, to theJvlanilla ; Law a'n Jones to the :3oyut ; Lit utena..t
Dennis O'Brian, to the Bacchante; I.lcerenant Slim Hood, to
difto ;Lieutenant G‘shug, to ditto; Lieutenant John Hama, to
the Ganymede.
A few days ago the body of Lieutenant SMITH, of
the Marines, who was upset in a boat, with several cf
1 his met, some time since, in the Downs, wits brought
on shore at Ramsgate, having been picket up at sea.
The corpse was buried with military honours by
Litut..Colonel Coarse, of the 2d Somerset Militia, a.
Gentleman whose urbanity of manners oz.! humane
disposition ar: conspicuous on every cccasion.

ItiMdilltin LP citst •

itILLTING TO AX .AISAULT, MINI AT THE ASIITZIit Af
WINCNLATISIt IN 1810, Wil. PAIX.N, AN ArtnIINEVI

AT FARMAN, PLAINTIrFo AND MI!. DFSMAIIK, SI:1141
°SOX OF IBS MAJIIIITY'S SHIP FAN JOsEV, DILFESDANT.;

A poor woman, *Te to a tna•ine on hb:u4 the
San Josef, lying at Spith:ad in July 1809, havirig
travelled from D.nrotish r • with twc. pung
to see her husband, hid the misfortune to hate one
of them taken ill with the small p .z, sht rtly
going- on board. She was, cf co .3 s,•, in I rder to
prevent the communication of infation am' ntz !he
ship's company, ordered on shore, amoig str .ng rs,
wi,nout motley, ssithotn fiends, and can ying c nta-
gion in her arms. A small .übscyipion vas instantly
made at the ward-room table for her; And it occurred
to Mr. Denm.trk, that he might be able to gain 11. r
admittance into a Ii use rofirrly adapted for Mr rereft.
of Jrnalhoox tatires, in the parish of itchfield
(to which he belonged, and whit h u as si. t,a•ed ah, ut
seven miles d;staiice), thr ugh the medium of a Mn.i
BRETT, t f that place, t•f whose hanlanlty he h7d a
high opinion. effect this humane purpDse, he
wrote her the following lettet, viz. :

" His Majesty's ship San Josef, tad Inly, Ito 9.
" My Deal MAnau—la the first pl.te, give me leave 10 ell.
quire partkulatly atter your valuable heath, ant', 1.1 the next
place, to recommend to your bens voleut attention a poor v, nnia%
whose child hat been taken ill of the small-poi, on hisstrJ thus
ship. We cannot, viit!ytit rntlabgs ring the
.614's company,
k:ep her on board, and her being a perfect st: at per, with sin
friends at Portsnionth,willobv:ate her hr.r.ecov. o at loslglnp.
I have, therefore, my char b:admn, mo.t arisestly to in nit
you vecil are your beneficent influence to stt her into the pest,.
house. In this you will rartici.larly oblige tee ergo must eve:
hold you in the iiie..cst ifeitnition. Believe me,
" Nly dear Nlai.lam, ever tmly,
" Your tleiient humble streact,
" at.exANDEN DrXMAItto
" P.S. The object of your attention is a nurine's whe, wb
has travelled from Pl)aum h."

This lady adv;ied wi h the parish'clerk, Roger
G.usti, who in his turn recommended the op;awa
of an Attrrney to be taken oh the prcr woman's c ;se I I
Accordingly Joseph Padd,m, an averney at F..re-
ham, upon the sole authority of this parish cletk,
wrote Mr. De:ll=k the following letter, viz.:

Fartham, 2Lth 180 e.

" Sia—The church wariencarsi overs:ers cf li ctifie'd has*
direcred m., on behalf of i hems. lye% and tfie re-t of the i ,u. tal
iantr, tb stir you in art action-at-law, or ',wood, ye/thy into
counsel -hall advise, for t! .e reset ussoorradak art!, a
INDECENT act they Litre tear ha I occasion to seek a remedy at
law for. Y•ru have sent into the i arish a family *acted with this
small-pox, not having the lea -t claim to rel.ef there; add fiat
tco, in a inalim:r which giv:s the *lent goats to the lady, opdh
whose knowledge of you in yertit profession, you 'renew tb ask
assistance of In this ABON.INA OLE 'I FLANSAC I lON. Tour
letter to her is More me. You state th t it would eadangrr the
ship's company to keep the famly on bard. Pray are not the
Eves of the inhabitants of Titch6eld as Valuable as dr se of she
ship's company ? And is not the rife of Mr Anderson, wt el hat
never yet had the small-pox, but who was Pt oerarily the persoa
to receive this potilootial consignment from you, of equal viiiso
with that of any i trim:dual on Loard the Sate In.. f? You have
caul d .he grt.t st distress in the pariah of Tathjtiot, and /mat aso
aver for :he erin:equences. At present I can mil lowa of you
s recomp,-ice for the injury which the parsh as a body sustains.
And I am dlr.rted to call upon you tor your undertaking is
writirg to defray all the expences which th: parish may incur is
consequence of your ‘l: liettevoloto attent;ea to a fir loorocte, soh*
,eiat Suer hold pm :m the hipostat oti cation." Your immediate do-
t:rsuinstiun win drermine the parish, in whose ix half I am, Sr..
" Your v.ry obedient humid? seivant,
. " J. rAO.011."

Mr. Denmark, on the receipt of the above letter,
waited on the paris't officers, who assured him that,
instead of having authorized the above Joseph Paddon
to write t I him such a letter about the :acted fim;ly
whi:h 14 had sent into t le parish, they did not so
mush as know 4 f the circumstance of the family
being in the parish, except a Mr. Fry. one of the over_
sees, and vein Ile had not anthlrlced the wri:ing of
su h a 1.-tter as was sent by P.seldoo. Up, n receiving
this information, Mr. Denmark npaited to Fareliam,
the place of the residence of l'addon, and finding the
latter net in a humour to recta, t any of the expree.
sions he had used, he, in the lan.tage of the Ltw,
committed an assault upon his Lady ; or, in plain.
English,,uonsewuteeco'uty. Th, consequence was,
a prosecution nn the part of Paidon ; and, as might
be expected, a conviction at the asst es at Winchvstee
in 1810. On the 14th instant, Mr. Denmark was
brndght up to the Court t f King's Bench to restive
juigment, when he gave in afildavitx,.siating that he
had been. called on to pay, and had paid the parish•
officers, for the expences of the poor woman and her
children while in the pest-house of Titchfield 1 that
he had been put to very heavy expences in preparing
Or a trial at the Quarter Session); at Winchester in
1809 ; that he had incurred nr. re than seventy pounds
in law expellees. previous to June 1S RI (n t knows in
Km much he had incurred since,) and that Iv: had
now been compelkd to leave Lis sh,p, and to travel
expr.ssly from 111,n- telt to London, ar.ti to remain
here many days, while his family were in the greatest
anxiety on his account. His Counsel presented sew*.
rid other affidavits. p ricol iriy en* Ir. at Sir Charlet
Caton, Co:nmander in C;iitf of the Channel Fleet,
strongly expressive of the ht.mani ty, benevolence and
gentmtnlike behaviour of Mr..Delimark, both in his
prefkssioaal and private situations; and expressing
kis opinion, that notYng shot; of great provocation
could have urged him to a vklatiin of the laws.—
Also, an affidavit of Mr. Fry, one of the parish
officers, declining that Paddon Was a .t authorized
to write to Mr. Denmark, in the 'unqualified terms
he made uce of in his letter to thiagentiernan.
The Coot sentenced him to p a-LIC cf £3O to
the King, and to ha d b to keep the peace fir two
yeari.—ln the course of the pleadiag in this cause,
Lord Ellenborough obszTved, Oat " the Court feat
that all the conduct of the dtf.ndaet meritorioNs
up to tat_ unfortunate moment ia which he exceeded
the bcungs of law." He also obset ved, that Mr. Ser.
jeant.Pell .6 need not enforce the subj •ct matter of
l'achion's letter ; for the Ceurt will pet ceive it was a
mares kart-, and that he was not warranted te the
extent he went."

Watitiesdzy the 6th instant, DONPIIQUI DUCAIB4
Capysin and Aid.dis Camp to Geticral Durnutt, Tuts-
DUAL ANTuilig KARIM IL* Lieutenant, And JULIA*
DESLOIItIL;, three. French pr6one,s of war as
Chesterfield, wee coniucte,4 from the Hot,te tiCor.
restive there, by a intlicary escort, on astir stay to
Morn an Cross Prisen, Li* having br. .k n their rat. La
or honour. The sane escort to k another ptisosset
t(-Monsieur 13aahlca, an Ensign) from Nows,k.
'ni.vingalso escaped from Chp:afieLl. .

. _L

~k~

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, NOVEMBIR
THE KING V. DAVENPORT SEDLEY.
This defendant was now brought up for judgment
He, together with John Sedley, Edward Meyer, and
Jolla ,ibri 1 Gustavus Kierrulff, calling himself Ba-
ran Kierrru ff. and a Foreign Nobleman, had been indicted
for a conspiracy to defraud the Marquis of Headfort;
the present defendant was found guilty, John Sedley
and Edward Meyer had not appeared, and J. G. G.
Icierrulff was acquitted.
The reader will recollect the prominent features of
this complicated frau I, in which it was proved, that
the defendant had, in order to induce the Marquis
to give him his acceptances on.bids of exchange to a
large amount, carried on a correspondence aids him
in the persons if various fictitious characters, writing
him one letter in the name of O'Brien, a pretended
friend of titefamily of the Marquis'ahousekeeper,affect-
big to caution hint against Meyer, who had acquired
hit vest fiats by loans to the Prince of Wales, Duke
'of York, and other persens of fashion, at usurious in-
:tomtit. At last, in order to intimidate the Marquis
Into the payment of his own acceptances, for which
the defendants had failed in their promise of giving
his Lordship any consideration, letters were written
to him as it from bowls& holders of the bills, expres-
sing eteir authors' surprise at his Lordship's conncc-
't ,nt with a mat of so infamous and unnatural a cha-
. ratter as Meyer, who had been'thrice palmed for a
detestable cff.n2, and= offering, provided his Lord-
• ship paid one MR of £SQQ, to clear him from the
rest; at the same time threatening, incase of non-
compliance, to placard Meyer about the streets, as a
party to this bill, with his Lordship, or to drag him
to Bow-street, where, as the Reporters were lavish of
their abuse, his Lordship would doubtless come in
,for his share, with a character like Meyer, who was
stigmatised with every obnoxious epithet. Draughts
or copies of all these letters were found in the cowrie,
ted defendant's possession; and the conspiracy was
..otherwise so clearly proved against hint, that his
*Counsel at the trial made no defence for him.
Lord ELLENDMIOI3thi read his notes of the evi-
dence at the trial in frill; and the defendant now
put in only one affidavit, stating, that the letter t.ign-
ed se Thomas O'Brien" was not written by the de-
fendant's son; John Sedley, as was proved at•the trial
by George Barnes and imputing to that witness
convictions of fraud.
The defendant then addressed the Court in mitiga-
tion of punishment, with a very violent gesture, and
a strong Irish accent. He began by recriminatin
upon his presecut4, who, he said, meant to benefit
bis own credit, which was completely lost in Ireland,
by his bill negotiations with Meyer, which were as
much for the accommodation of one party as the
other. He denied that his son had written the letter
signed " Thomas O'Brien ;" he had never trusted
. him with his affairs. He said that Barnes would
have sworn any thing as to that hand-writing, which
he desired of their Lordships to compare with his
son's hand, and they would find there was not the
slightest resemblance between the two. He accused
the Marquis of Headfort of offering £l.OO to two
" hull-dogs" to swear him guilty of fe ony at the Old
Bailey; :aid re'ated a story of a conversation which
bad passed on Viat subject between his Lordship and
a friend at the Union Club-house.
Lord ELLENBOROUGH asked him why he had not
eflidavits as to all this?
The defendant replied, that every body refused to
appear connected with him, so Llack had he been re-
presented in the newspapers.
Lord Eeer.eieniouou asked hint how he accounted
for the draughts of the letters its question being all
found in his house?
• The defendant replied, that Richard Walker left
copies of all the correspondence at his house, when
he was not at home; and the defendant had taken co-
pies of it. He made a great many more irrelevant and
violent observations, some of which we failed to un-
derstand; and in the course of his speech stated him-
self to be in the 68th year of his age.
• The ATTOKNET-GUNZRAL, in support of the prose-
cution, said, that although this was not the period for
a defendant to impugn the verdict of a Jury, yet if
facts could be disclosed to the Court, which would
',hew that the Jury had in any degree formeti an er-
roneous conclusion, it was never too late to restore to
a defendant that justice of which his trial had depri-
ved him. But what the presentelefendant had asserted
was either wholly unsupported by affidavit; and if it
was so supported, was wholly immaterial. What if
Ow defendant's son did not write the letter signed—a.
Th mu O'Brien r' • The defendant's affidavit did'
not tell the Court who did write it. It said only
that the depoaent had seen a nameless person write
and deliver -it. And what if GeBFge Barnes deser-
ved all the reproach with which the defendant and
his deponent had loaded him? Was not the con-
spiracy otherwise abundantly proved ? Was not the
Margot: of Headfort defrauded ? Was not the de-
-fondant a party to that fraud ?--And would the
defendant's story ..f taking copies of those letters, as
they wet e lett with hem, go down with a baby? It
rested simply upon the de dant's allegation and cer-
tainly had no weight in itself. Ii this case the-Attor-
ary General could not, as he usually did, ask the
Court to measure the defendant's punishment by his
guilt ; for there was no degree of punishment in the
power of this Cou which was at all commensurate
with the iniquity ovlrDavenpert Sedley. His arts in
swindling the Marquis out of his acceptances were
bad enough ; but their infamy IVAi so completely
swallowed up by his diabolic Al conuivances to o'etain
the prymeat of them, that brae was apt to forget the
less misdemeanour in the greater. His Lordship had,
however, shewu a proper firmness on this occasion I
and the Attorney General trusted that the Court
would think this a case in which t'ley (night not to
fillot that they hid it in their power to inflict an in-
- famous punishment upon this ,most infamous offence.
- Mr. Gannow, on the same side, urged the infliction
of this wholesome punishment. The defendant had
said, that Meyer had receive) a scar in the cheek from
a brick which had been thrown of him in the pillory;
and the public justice of the country would not Lel
that the Court were going too far in submitting the
person of the defendant to the same public exposure,
that every body may in future guard against the arts
of so, profound a villain. The defendant had stated
himself to have been acquitted of felony at the Old
Bailey by the direction of Lord Ellenborough ; but

he Would recollect that a very little more indeed
would have altered the nature of that verdict.
Mrs CURWOOD was on the same side.
Lord ELLENIOROUGH—Let eie defendant be com-
mitted to the custody of the Marshal of the Marshal-
s:a, and brought up for judgment on Monday next.
THE KING V. TIIE INHABITANTS OF READING.
This was a question upon the settlement of a pau-
per, and the main point was, whether a subsequent
Bet vice of apprenticeship voidtd a previous service for
a year ? The pauper, in this case, had originally be-
longed to the parish of Reading, but in the year
l8('6, being then a minor, he hired himself for a year
to a brick-maker, at Shenfield, in Berkshire ; at the
expiration of the first three months of this period he
entered into a new engagement with his master to
bind himself as an apprentice to him for the space of
four years, to learn the art of brick-maker and kiln-
burning, the master to have the benefit of his labour,
providing him with diet and lodging, and a suit of
clothes at the expiration of his apprenticeship. This
agr:ement appeared to be upon unstarnped paper,
and contained other informalities. Having served
the whole of his term, the pauper afterwards became
chargeable on the parish, and applied to the parish
of Reading, where he had os iginally resided, for re-
lief, butan order of Session rennved him tothe parish
of Shenfield, he having obtained a settlement there by
his service of more than a twelvemonth. Against
this order the parish of Shenfield now appealed, upon
the grounds that the service for a year had been su-
perseded by the subsequent apprenticeship, and the
indenture being informal was void, and the palish
consequently not chargeable.
After hearing Mr. Aauorr and another Gentle.
man fur the appeal, and Mr. BOROUGH and Mr.
WAKESIRLD, in support of the order of Session,
The Court were unanimously of opinitm, that, not-
withstanding the subsequent apprenticeship, there had
teen a good service for a year, and accordingly con-
firmed the order of Session for settling the pauper in
the parisltmof Shenfield.
Till KING V. GEORGE PARRY.
This was a question on a Mandamma directing an
enquiry into the election of the defendant as a Com-
mon Councilman of the Borough of Haverfordwest.
The circumstances of the case were shortly as fol-
lows :—There being a vacancy for six Common
Councilmen in the Borough of Haverfordwest, a
meeting, at which the Mayor, as directed by charter,
presided, was convened for the purpose of election ;
several candidates presented themselves,among whom
were the defendant and a person nomed Bennet. At
the commencement of the poll, notice was given to
the Mayor, that the election of these two Gentlemen
would be opposed, they being incompetent to fill the
office. not having taken the Sacrament within the
preceding twelvemonth. The poll, however, pro-
ceeded, and the two defendants, standing fifth and
sixth on the poll, were declared by the Mayor duly
elected, notwithstanding a remonstrance being made
to them by several electors, and the two Gentlemen
next on the poll required to be returned. s Upon this
an application was made, and a rule of Court obtain-
ed for a Mandamus t, be directed to the Mayor for
a Conspi:acy with the defendant and others, to hive
the defendant so elected.
Mr. A asorr this day contended, that under the
Indemnity Act the defendant was eligible, as that
Act provided that a subsequent qualification, by
taking the sacrament, was sufficient to qualify the per-
son erected.
Mr. Ovate, on the other side, contended, that this
subsequent qualification would not qualify the candi-
d ite, but that the Statute of Conformity, the Act of
Chat les the Second, required a preceding compliance
with the Act.
Loud ELLENNOROUGH, however, held that the de-
fendant had qualified himself under the indemnity
Act. The Conformity Act ctriainly required that
the person offering himself a candidate should qu ilify
himself by previously taking the Sacrament ; the de-
fendant, therefore, at the time of his election, was in-
capacitated ; but the Act of Indemnity provided, that
if the person so elected should afterwards quality
himself by taking the Sacrament previous to an)
other person being elected, his incapacity should be
removed ; that the defendant had done, and having
so complied with the provisions of the Indemnity Act,
he had rendered himself eligible.
The rest of the Court were 431 the same opinion,
and the election of the defendant was confirmed.

Monday last a numerous meeting of the keepers of
Eatiag.houses and Cook-shops was convened, in eon-
sequence of near 200 informations having been laid
against them, for selling beer, or permitting it t• be
sold in their houses without being duly licenced, I
thereby incurring the penalty of £2O for each
offence. In the case of Mr. Anderson of Drury-,
lane, the Magistrates established the liability, and he
was lined in the mitigated penalty of £lO, which
was enforced under a clause in the Act of the 35. h
of his present Majesty, cap. 113, the preamble of which
repeals all former statutes, and enacts, that from
and after the 20th rf September, 1795, if any persoa
shall sell ale or seer, or any other exciseable liquors
by retail, or shall permit or suffer any ale or beer, or
any other • exciseable liqoors; io be s ald by retail in
his, her, or the;r house, without being duly licenced so
to do, and shall tL'reof be duly convicted, every
such person so offending, shall, for every such offence,
fot frit and pay the sum of 420.1 t was unanimously
resolved to petition the Treastery Board, to grant an
indemnificati in from the penalty until the meeting
or Pa:amen:4 and then to solicit the interference of
the Legislature to amend the Act.
Monday morning, about thtve o'clock, the house
of Mr. Wilkinson, of Btreaduam Common, was broke
open, and robbed of Banknotes to the amount of
about £5O, several articles of plate, and other pro-
perty. The family were alarmed by the barkinar of
a dog that was in an adjoin;ng room, Mr. Wilkin-'
son got up and rung the alarm.bell, which did not
awake his neighbours. His coachman was' in the
yard when the robbers, there in number, passed him ;
but he was so panic-struck, that he did not attempt
to stop them, or give any alarm, and they walked
away with th it booty ; and there is no doubt, from
th track of wheels, that they gad a chaise or cart
near the spot. it is supposed the horse and chaise
were put up during the night in Lord Coventry's
Park. At day-light, on the spot where the horse was
supposed to have been fed, an iron crow, and Mr.
Wilkinson's keys, were found.

Bcanhisric4L PROMOTIONS.

Dustin CasTLe, Nov. 14.—His Royal Highness the Prince
Regent has been pleased, in the name and on the behalf of his
Majesty, by Letters Patent, under the Great Seal of !rebind, to
promote the Rev. George Hall, Doctor of Divinity, Provost of
frinity College, Dublin, to the Bishopric of Drawee, in the
room of DoctorThomat Percy, late litahop thereof, deceased.
His Royal Highness the Prince Regent has also been plea-sd,
in the name, and on the behalf of hi Majesty, by Letters Pa-
tent under the Great Seal cf Ireland, to constitute ana appoint
the Rev. Thomas Ellington, Doctor in Divinity, t• be Provost
of Trinity College, Dublin, in the room of the Rev. Dr. Ha;
promoted to the Bishopric of Dromore.

Already is the distress arising from the high prke
of bread so heavily felt, that Addresses, praying that
the use of grain in the distilleries may be prohibited,
have been prepared, or are preparing, at Glasgow,
Liverpool, Birmingham, and Nottingham. The city
of London ought not to be last, in attending to this im-
portant subject.
Those who suffer a partial loss of Teeth, may now
have those useful agents supplied, by Mr. BLADEN
RUSPINI, of Pall-Mall, upon an entire new method,
which will be- found to combine the three great objects
of ease, beauty, and durability of Nature ! _

Thursday evening, as a youth was crossing the
fields to Islington, with a bundle of wearing apparel,
he was accosted by a fellow near the Shepherd and
Shepherdess, who knocked him down, and robbed
him of the same.

Mr. Pattestvest's Dairy, at his house on Ealing
Common, was broken open at an early hour on Tues-
day morning, by a desperate gang of thieves, who
took away all the butter churns, milk pails, butter-
milk tubs, in short, every thing belonging to the
Diiry, with which they got clear of.
Yesterday, jo'i se Davi: was charged before the
Lotto MAYOR with robbing a lad of two five-pound
notes of the Birmingham Bank. It appeared that
the prisoner frightened the boy by pretending that
the notes were forged, and by that means got posies-
sion of them. Additional proof was produced that
the notes were good ones, and not forged. Another
charge.of a similar nature was prefrrred against the
prisoner ; but this he denied, and said he could prove
an alibi, if he received time. His Lordship ordered
the priscnrr to be remanded for further examination,
that he might have an opportunity to bring forward
his friends.

ACClDENTL—Yesterday Smith, a labnurer,
while repairing an old house in Rupert-street, White-
chapel, was precipitated from the roof into the street,
by which he was so shockingly bruiy..d, as to be taken
to the hospital without hopes of recovery.

Yesterday morning, a labourer employed at the
London Dock, landing of goods from on board a ves-
sel, fell overboard, by which he received a violent
contusion on the head, and was otherwise so much
hurt as to be taken to the London Hospital, in a most
dangerous state.
- - - - -

A few days since a: some children, in the parish of
Robertsbridge, were at play by the blink of a pool,
one of them fell in, and although there were 22 feet
of water, and 14 of depth from where the child fell
to the water, it was got out unhurt, by a humane
butcher, who descended by a rope, and found the
child sitting on a piece of board, floating on the top
of the element.

Tuesday se'nnight a quantity of powd:r in one of
the powder-mills at Seddlescomb, took fire, and
caused a pretty loud explosion ; by which the roof of
the mill WAS stripped off.

An Inquisition was held yesterday by ANTHONY I
Gott., Esq. on the body of a man who on Monday
fell off the roof of Westminster Abbey.—Verdict.
Accidental Death.
The value of Dr. FREEMAN'S Gum SALVTARIS
has been so long proved, that nothing of the present
day can bear a competition with it, in all.the diffe-
rent stages of a certain disease, which it effectually
cures and eradicates from the habit, without exciting
the painful feelings and exposure that attends saliva-
tion—without debilitating the constitution in any de.
gree, or even requiring confinemeutfrom business or
restriction of diet. The radical virtues of these ines-
timable Drops have proved their claim to public ap-
probation for more than 30 years. In allthe debility
of both cxes they prove a never-failing restorative—
whether the debility is produced by too free use of ,
mercury, .by illicit pleasures, or ths effects of a warm
climate To travellers and tbosekoing abroad, they
cannot be recommended too strongly, as they will.re-
ceive a safe, speedy, and complete cure, in all old
stubborn gleets, and every weakness that affects the
bladder and organs of urine. By. its efficacy many
women have become mothers, who for many years
had been deprived of that happiness.—Sold wholesale
and retail, at Mr. Butler's, No. 4, Cheapside, corner
of Paternoster-row ; and retail, by Belam and Sharp.
Portsmouth ; Hall and Johnson. Gosport ; Allnutt,
Weston, Mallory, and Jones, Portico; Trewman,
Exeter ; Cookworthy, Glenville, Gilbert, and Hoz-
land, Plymouth; Newbury, Dublin; Baxter and Mac-
donald, Glasgow ; Smith, Manderston, Scam, and
Cargill, Edinburgh; Crutwell, Bath; Ross and Peck,
Hull ; Gregson and Billinge, Liverpool ; Stains and
Lynch, Manchester ; Bowen, Norwich ; Knott and
Lloyd, Birmingham • Gregory, Brighton; Edwards
and Penny, Liverpool; and most Medicine Venders,
I in bottles, at 2s. 9d. 4s. 6d. Et 225.