Star.
London, England, 1819-09-10 00:00:00

Royal Highness and his
Mim-
lays, were not the elsentatitin
luiry after a lapse twenty
circumstances he feb it his
itions his hearty support.
!d, that much stress ilat tai
) opposed the Resatu,dons,•on
Icy of the Manchester MAlO-
said one Honourable Baronet,
Le the confidence of that Court.

ve approved their proceedings,
another Honourable Member;
ation for • further inquiry was
en, he would ask, had such op-

imcr occasions of pnblic
agita-
utly hAd they been refuted?—
recollect, that by the Consti-
,...ed to approach the Throne,
wolved a duty. It was then

•sent occasion, to exercise that
lien they recollected that his
:ince llegeat was in the hands
ritercst in keeping him in igno-
s, and had no opportunity of

rnrd of the true expression of
ept by the declaration of the
convened. But if Magistrates
s empowered to put their arbi..l
he object of Public Meeting%
to stop ?--sslio would affix the
stance, in a district where there
Magistrates, and the Lircum-
•eme case, who considered the

ociety fraught with danger to
id highly illegal, where was the
ceding% as those at Manchester
t those Meetings would not be
of cavalry, cutting right and
Meeting ?—(Much approbation.)
our history, when us the beat
)ccurrences took place near to
; of soldiery blocked up the
)t- orship of that most respect-
iety of Friends in.Gracechurch-
suld recollect the case of Penn,

II liberality had subsequently
, there was no security against

mion of party Magistrates, un-
and zealous adherence to the

ion. Around that Constitution

t Court to .1 any, and if offences

art of the multitude, or on the

iuty it was to administer the
one decide. There was no wish

e who supported the Resolu-
over the excesses of either. They
ation into the conduct of the

though outrages had taken
as manifested to inquire, -while

ioters, as they were called, was
I investigation. In his opinion,
nibt that the Meeting at Man-
for a legal purpose (whatever
might exist as to the propriety
therefore, it became the duty
in an inquiry why such a Meet-
spersed by an armed force? He
ag his support to the Resolutions.
toLey said a few words in a low
od him to say that the accounts
re contradictory, and in the ab-
vould vote against theßesolutions.
ved, that he had ii from an eye-
ck on the Assembly at Manchester
Le Yeomanry Cavalry, but by a
s—( No, no! frogs the Court).
rAAAI3 rose, amidst cries of--
Lid, that he should consider it a
almost amounting to perjury, if'
is reasons for the Vote he should
ot question before the Court. It
this in agreeing to the petipmed
in were prejudging the question.
ejudged, it was by those who ap-
ict of Manchester Magistrates,
ys after the commission of such
ity—(liear, hear).—lt had been
to uphold the faithful and fearless
ie law. He was the enemy to all
able schemes of public improve-
not help thinking that the errors
large assemblages of the people
;roc r, he attributed to the ab-
sons who, from their character,
talei.ts, and their stake in
best calculated to give a tone and
c)!,ular opinion— ( Hear, hear).—
: people in distressed districts, to
and sixty thousand persons, were
But what created that tenor
its most aggravated form from the
wlio pet vetted the authority they
Bowing the people to express their
uzionally assembled in their an-
^s of " Hear, hear !" resounded
i. The people at Manchester met
, and unarmed—their being with-
ed by the result. For he, for one,
in saying, that if he held a staff in
11 a sword under his cloak, and had
y assailed by a cavalry soldier, he
,voured to defend himself. 4t rat eedings could be judged of, iom
tEigistracy. If"theie were some
they did, there could be non, as
not do. He had heard from per-
ky, that the Riot Aft was hat Yead.
ud, that the atrocity himineaceJ
y raised the cry of seizing the ban-
..idered that blame Tested afe
LSe they omitted to ao that Which
cable, viz. to raise plicards, an-
assutr.bled multitude, that the Riot
read at a certain hour, and that the
it peril, should disperse. Bt not,
sobriety of deliberation *bleb be-
caused a wanton outrage oh the'
ity's subjects ; and that Conn would
acter it held, as the first Corpora-
ow, if it did not support the -Rein-
ial inquiry....(Heaiyhear).
Wairttwor made a tIOSC aniMritdil
bat the object ons of the 4pp:ogee*
-he would not dignify them with dm
arguments—had titan mattditteite-
pLintly answered. The importance