Star.
London, England, 1820-07-12 00:00:00

. for . lbject in their minds.
Mr. BROUGHAM said, he had imagined this ap-
plication would' have been- treated as a matter. of
course. Indeed, if it was not, no Member could at-
tend the Lords on Writs of Enos, which was equally
contrary to the Standing Order. If his application.
were refused, he should move that Standing Order
in the case Of all Counsel, Members of the House.
M'r. WYNN said, there was a difference in the two
original Resolutions containing the Standing 05lers;
one of them prohibiting Members from attending
the House of Lords without leave, the other contain-
ing a prohibition without any mention of leave. He
thought, under all the circumstances of the present
case, the application should be granted.
Mr. BROUGHAM hoped he should 'tot be re-
quired to postpone his motion bey and to-morrow.'
After a iew words between Mr. WYNN and Mr.
BpouonAM,
Lord- CASTLEREAGH said, he wished to be un-
derstood that he saw no objection to the application,
but wished time to consider it, as the Standing Or-
ders were quite new to him.—Notice for to-morrow.
Sir FRANCIS BURDETT observed, that the
King's Attorney-General, who had been ordered to
attend the Lords, was in the same situation as the
Queen% Counsel.

to guard against its repetition. But ' e
. that such a proceeding would meet due tr:
version. The course which he thought it pi.o.,er
', with a view to bring this affair regnlatly
consideration of the House, was to mo e—
le Head of the Barrack Department sh Fi),l
the Bar of the House, in order to be

as to the authority under which he had uh_
dertaken to commence or proceed in the erectiol
the Barracks alluded to."—The Honourable Ge:-Ale-

mall moved accordingly.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER s
that the building of these Barracks was of course
der the controul of Parliament, by which alone the
means of defraying the expense could be furni ih(A.
The Barrack Department must be fully aware of th's
in any erection which they undertook, and would no
doubt proceed with due caution. But in order zr,
•afford an opportunity for inquiry upon the subjcv,
he expressed a wish that the Honourable Mein!..,:
would postpone his motion..
Mr. CALCH AFT thought it incumbent upon ti:t
House to 'proncunce some decision upon this aff.tir,
as it involved a direct attempt to supersede its func-
tions. But having no disposition whatever to act
harshly towards the Head of the Barrack Department,
be had no objection to comply with the Bight [Jon.
Gentleman's wish to postpone-his motion.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said,
he understood that the Inspector of the Barrack De-
partment had had some communications with the
Lords'of the Treasury, with respect to the consttuc-
Lion of the Barracks alluded to.
Notice was entered of 31r. CALCIL%PfS Motion
for to-morrow.

at stall antieipste, that the Bill shoved annealing% fail be taken I
that "lips*, they (thi9ueen4 Cionselrwsiuld have trusted 6;
at to request not to be parnlittetl4 vete an it. He tared triativersio
m the permission to attend the Lords to be limited to to pursue,
re [bp-particular, arid iiccompanied with a declara- unifier the
laTt that it shditld in tiowise be drawn into precededt. 4, That till
Lord CASTLEREAGH suggested that notice Attend at t
m add be given of the motion, that time might be rogated a
to 'id for Members to turn the subject in their minds. dertaken t