Star.
London, England, 1820-10-09 00:00:00

NAVAL INTELLIGENCE.

Captain Btarams is appointed to the Bann ; Lieutenant Wan.
waters Wen is promoted to a Commander, and appointed to
the. Parthian; Lieutenant O. BLACKMAN, promoted to Com-
'sunder, and appointed to the Raleigh; Lieutenant &omen
Precut., promoted to Commander, and appointed to the Fal-
mouth: *Lieutenant W.J. H. Joanna's is promoted to a Corn-
launder. Lieutenant Joan Henson (a), to be Flag Lieutenant
to Sir Catalan Rowtev ; Mr. J. Nueva, Purser of the Severn.
The Blossom, 24, Captain Vsexoe, sailed on Wednesday
from Portsmouth, for the St. Helena station. The Wye, Cap-
tain P. Puma, and the Brisk, Captain J. W. Moment have
returned to the Sheerness station ; and the C.an*eleon rasa,
MILIKIAT, sailed for Plymouth, with seamen for the eambriaa
frigate.
The Orpheus, Mr. HOMY MU" Muter, arrived at Ports-
mouth, from the Mauritius, on Wednesday, whence she sailed
on the 30th May, and from the Cape on the 28th July. The
Topue, 46, Capt. Lamer, was at the Mauritius. Sir Batman
Kuic. arrived at the Cape, in the Minden, 74, Capt. NILSSON,
on the 20th July, and was to sail in four or Ave days far Eng-
land, in company with the Seringapatarn, 46, a new frigate,
from Bombay, commanded by Captain WlLLl•ll4Wautoca, late
of the Curlew. The Minden left Trincomalee the 211th May.
The Britannia, of 120 guns, is expected to be launched from
Pi mouth Dockyard on the 20th instant.
The Revenbe cutter Hardwicke, Lieutenant RRAD (a), was
lost a few days since, on the Bull and Calf rock, coast of Ire-
land; the stores and crew saved.
Pxvitourn OCT. 6.—Arrived yesterday, the Cumberland,
Most, from Virginia for London • and Ontnium &uproars',
from Memel for Topsham. Arrived to-day, the ilufford, Gar-
ten, from St. Andrew's for London ; and Agingourt. Ruts-
roan, from Quebec for ditto.—Wind E.
POILTSMITOTII, OCTORIR N.E.—Arrived yesterday,
the Isabella, Nom, from London, and sailed to-day for Chatles-
tas.—Also sailed the Prince of Orange, for New South Wales.
Dan, Onuses B.—Wind E.N.E.—Came down from the
River yesterday and sailed, the Isabella, Nan., for Charleston.
Sailed Ida Majesty's ship Wrz, for heerness. Arrived the
Bun sloop of war, from Portsmouth. Arrived to-day, and
sailed for the River, the General Graham, Maass, from Ja-
maica; and Wallace Edkln, Roux, from St. Domingo. Caine
down from the River, and sailed, the Riga, I'OILSTCI4 for the
Havannah ; and the Trafalgar, Beau, for Antigua.
Spasseess, Oce. 7.—Arrived at the Nore, the John, Ikea-
tunes, from London for Bahia, with loss of an anchor.
Haawicx, Ocr. 8.-.-Arrived the Castlereagh packet from
Cuxhaven, and Prince of Orange ditto from Holland, each with
a Mail. alled the Earl of Leicester and Lord Nelson packets
for llolland ; Beaufoy and Lady Nepean ditto for Cuxhaven;
and Thetis ditto for Gottenburgh ; each with a Mail.
FALMOUTS, Orr. 6.—Arrived the St. Mary, RUM/4 from
Jamaica for London. Sailed the Prince Ernest packet, for
Lisbon ; and Countess of Chichester ditto, for the Mediterra-
nean, each with a Mail; and the Fortitude, Maumee, for
Bilboa. The sloop India, Ewa, of Padstow, from Plymouth
for New Quay, in attempting to reach this harbour last night in
a gale,fell to leeward, it being very dark,and struck on the Gauges,
at the entrance of Helford Harbour, and immediately sunk.
The captain and crew, excepting one man, were drowned.
Cuaroa-Harsz, OCT. 7.—Entered Inwards : The Darthula,
from Archangel; Vriendschap, Jonge Gerrut, Vrow Haasie,
and Three Sisters, from Rotterdam; Prince of Orange, from
S. Petersienrgh ; Lively, front Aensterdam • Allies, front the
Cape of Good Hope; Chance, from Tunis; Hoffoung, from
Stralsund; New. Union, from Calais; Latona, from the South
Seas —Cleared Outwards : Amiable Bliss., for Havre; Alexan-
der, for Hantburgh ; Forbes. for Bengal.

THE ARMY.
MILITARY PROMOTIONS.
WAR-OFFICE, OCTOBER 6, 1820.
Royal Regiment of Horse Guards--Thomas P. Crosby, Gent.
to be Cornet, by purchase, vice Dashwood, promoted.
11th Regiment of Light Dragoons—Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel
Michael Childers to be Lieutenant-Colonel, by purchase, vice
Diggers, who retires; Lieutenant Alfred Davis, from half-
pay of the 22d Light Dragoons, to be Lieutenant, vice Ro-
bert Hollingworth. who exchanges, receiving the difference.
18th Regimebt of Foot—Lieutenant Oliver St. George to be
Captain by purchase, vice Maxwell, who retires; Ensign
John Campbell, to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice St.
George; Robert La Touche, Gent. to be Ensign, by pur-

chase-, vice Campbell.
cloth Ditto--IZaarrermaster John Keins, from half-pay of the
Regiment, to be Quartermaster, vice Alexander Juhnston,

who exchanges.
hist Ditto, - Coghlan, Gent. to be Ensign, without put-
cize Adolphus Grieve, deceased.
67th Ditta--.lssisLnt-Surgeon to the Forces James French,
be Assistant-Surgeon, vice Grcig, whose appoint-

reeut has beer. cancelled.
90th Ditto—E:le.ign Alexander Stuart to be Lieutenant, with-
out purchisc ; Johnston, Gent. to be Ensign, vice
Stuart; Lieutenant Hector Nlunto to be Adjutant, vice Craw
ford, appointed to the Bth Royal Veteran Battalion.
shi West India RegimLnt—Assistant.Surg,eon to the Forces
Henry Vices;:nus Haskins to be Surgeon, vice Thomas Mur-
ray, who retires upon half-pay.
10th Royal Vete:an Battalion—Lieutenant John Henderson to
br Atjutaet, vice William Barber, who returns to his former
situation on the Retired List.
survey. - - -

Captain Henry Erskine Somerville (second in command of the
Recruiting service of the East India Company, at the Depot
at Cilatliar.-.), to have the local rank of Major as long as he
tau) continue to du duty with the Depot.
HOSPITAL STAPP.
Ta Sargenns to the Forces—Surgeon James Elliott, from
half-pay, vice James William Dunkin, who retires ; Surgeon
Alexander lkoadroot, from half-pay of the Sicilian Regiment.
Commission in the 24 Somerset Militia, signed by the Lord

Lieutenant of the County of Somerset.
Peter Davis Sheraton Esq. to be. Major.
Commissions in the Regimenti of -Sussex Militia, signed by the
Lord Lieutenant of the County of Sussex.
Major John Harry Wdlard to be Lieutenant-Colonel, vice New-
berry, retired; Captain William Leeves to be Major, vice
Willard, promoted; Lieutenant William Gratwicke Kinle •
side to be Captain, vice Leeves, promoted.
Commissions signed by the Lieutenant and High Sheriff of the
Sheriffdom or &ewartry of Kirkcudbright.
John Gordon, Esq. to be Vice-Lieutenant; Edward Boyd,
Esq. to be
anther
Lieutenant ; James Stewart, Esq. to be
ditto • Alex Murray, Esq. to be ditto • Lieutenant-Co.
lonel Newall Maxwell to be ditto; ditto;
Robert Han-
nay, Esq. to be ditto.
Kirkcudbright and Wigtowo Regiment of Militia.
David Blair, jun. Gent. to be Surgeon, nice Christie, resigned.
Corps of Kilkuldbrigkt Gentlemen and Yeomanry Cavalry.
Captain John Martin to be Miler, vice Mitre, resigned : Lieu-
tenant George Charles Jones to be Captain, vice Martin, pro-
niotedit Sir John Gordon, Ban. to be Captain to the vacant
Troop; Carnet William Kennedy Lawrie to be Lieutenant,
vice Jones, promoted; Cornet James Herber:tom to be ditto,
sire Watts: Neu= Lawrie, resigned; James Donald, Gent.
to be Covello, vice. Ker, resigned ; and John .11' Millar, Gent.
to be ditto, vice Ilerb:rtsoo, promoted.

The Observer of yesterday, October 8, is reprinting, and will
be kept ate sale all this week; it was two sheets; no adver-
tisemer.ts were inserted; nearly the whole forty columns were
devoted to the queues business, of which Mr. lkoconam's
speech alone made nineteen of the Observer columns. Franks
to send it to any part of the United Kingdom' may be had gra-
tuitously at the Observer Offices, No. 169, and No. 192, strand.
Coax Facnartal, OCT. 9.—Towards the close of Friday's
market there was a tolerably brisk demand for wheat; and a
considerable clearance was effected of the best runs from Essex
and Suffolk, at a reektion of from 2s. to 55. per qr. from Mon-
day's prices; and, although the supply from those counties was
rather large this morning, that of line quality, sold en the same
tetras as on Friday, but the ordinary sorts were exceedingly
heavy sale, at a decline of 4s. per quarter from the prices of
this day sennight. The supply of barley being small, fine sam-
ples sold full Is. per. quarter higher, than on last 2donday, and
the Inferior qualities supported last week's prices. Oats are Is.
per quarter lower, owing to the magnitude of arrivals. luaus
and Grey Peas,*arelta. per quarter cheaper.
SOUTH/11LP MARLIST, QOT. 9.--Beef, 4s. pd. to 4s. ad. per
stone of 6lbs. ; Mutton, 4s 0d.11,46.105L Veal. ss. Od. to es. Od.
Pork, 5'.0t1. to 65.0 d. Lamb, Os*. ta,01.04.--Cattle at Market
Beasts,3l.so ; Calves, 200; Sheeplassi Webs, 18,920 ; Pigs, 290.
Hay, 31.103. to 41. 41.- Clover, St Os. to 64 ps; Straw, U. Os.

••° -.-
VI

RIPPI

" w "

mme.mermd...amayea...•••••••••••••••■•••••••=m•mrque
THE EVENING STAR. •

LONDON.

MONDAY, OCTOBER 9, 1820.
PRICE OF STOCKS TIIIS DAY AT ONE &CLOCK
3 per Coot. Coos. 678-5 per Cent. Navy 10.5311
Jodie Boob Us. pre.--Exchequer Bills 44. Ss. pre.
Commercial So. pm—Coneila for Account
THE QUEEN.

It can surprise no person who has attended to the
nature of the facts deposed against our gracious, be-
loved, and gallant Quinn, the means employed to
procure their evidence, and the singular constitution
of the memories bf all of them, that every effort made
by her prosecutors to uphold and support their evi-
dence, by the cross-examining of the witnesses pro-
duced to rebut the charges, should make their case
break under them more and more ; but it does sur-
prise every one, not versed in the technicalities of
law, to see men who had lamented that their pro-
fessional duties imposed upon them the hard ne-
cessity of eihibiting and producing charges of so
disgraceful a nature, that none could, or would,
rejoice more than themselves, in seeing them com-
pletely rebutted :—it does, we say, excite much
surprise, that men who expressed themselves so
feelingly, and seemingly with so much candour,
should yet deem it necessary., in support of such
charges, to endeavour, by any means whatever,
to prevent " the truth, and the whole truth," not
only respecting the direct charges, but respecting
the character of the witnesses, from being subjected
to the severest scrutiny. If truth be the object in
view, how can the truth suffer by sifting the charac-
ter of every witness, as to veracity, to the very bot-
tom, whatever may be the result as to the moral
character and conduct of the witness in any other .
respect? We ate willing to confess our great incom-
petence as to any point of law—especially in a mode
of trial unknown to the laws of England—bat we are ,
neither so bumble nor so diffident, after SO years
labour as Public Journalists, as not to pretend to a
common share of understanding ; and as there can be
no question that the far grriter number of our
Readers claim no more knowledge of the laws of
procedure, in a Bill of Pains and Penalties, than we do
ourselves, we wish only to be understood as appeal-
ing to common sense, in the view we take of the pro-
ceedings in the trial which now agitates the Public,'
and wrings the hearts even of those who not only
pressed it forward, but hoped for an issue very dif-
ferent from what everything that transpires points
out as the inevitable result.
Look at the witnesses on the one side,—and then
look at those on the other. Look at the convenient
memory of the one, and the direct positive testimony
of the other. Look at the filth and pollution—No 1 .
turn your eyes from the filthiness of the one, and
look at the propriety and consistency of the other:
Let this be done, and then we ask (not as lawyers),
Where is the justice of attempting to skreen a liar by
preventing questions irom being put to any witness,
in whatever way, or on whatever subject may best
unfold and expose his or her true character ?
For example—for we shall be best understood by
putting a hypothetical, but a very possible case—an
unprincipled prostitute chooses, in a trial of a wife
for adultery, to swear that she saw the gallant go
from his own room to that of her mistress, with a
candle in his hand, &c. and then went to her own
apartment, where she spent the night alone—no one
with her during the night, or any part of the night.
It might very naturally be concluded, that, seeing a
circumstance so shocking, that if any person were
in her room, she would naturally express to that
person her surprize and astonishment at what she
had witnessed, the moment she entered her own
apartment. The possibility of so natural an occur-
rence would suggest the propriety of putting the ques-
tion which we have supposed, upon her cross-exami-
nation ; and, had the question been answered.in the
affirmative, the next question would probably have
been, " Who was the person in your apartment ?"
and the next, " Did you mention to that person the
shocking fact which you witnessed r Such ques-
tions would naturally be put with a view of examin-
ing the person who was in her apartment, to see if
their testimony in any way differed. But-answering
that she spent the night alone, it would be next to a
miracle that she should be detected in a lie. Let us
suppose, however, that by some miracle it is dis-
covered, before the close of the trial, that she had
a gallant with her—that this immaculate, modest
chambermaid had a gallant with her that very night.
We say, let this be supposed, and then we ask, what
would common sense and abstract justice dictate as
necessary to be done? To examine the man, to be
sure,—if he can be found. Let us suppose that he is
found, and is examined, and goes on to state that he
was with this maid, that very night, and the door
locked upon them ! " Stop,—stop, says Legal Tech-
nicality, " you must not put any question that may
criminate the female witness—the witness not having
criminated herself!!" Now this is what common
sense revolts at. The witness criminates and swears
against another woman—that woman perhaps one of
high rook and dignity, but you must purno questions
to the man that can make her a liar, for tear you
should, forsooth, pore also that she is a !
No matter how foul, how filthy the witness had befbri
attempted to make her virtuous mistress, that rn;itress
being the one whom the Lawyer bas.fee'd to
load with abuse, and, if possible, to convict of adul-
tery—nothing must be admitted to rebut the charge,
but what comes wire-drawn through the levt-gaoge
of technicality. Let us not be misunderstand: we
are not contending that such a mode of procedure
may not be leigally attempted to be sotppoirted by law
jargon, and by veep' somul Lawyers too ; but only
that the feelings of right and wrong, implanted in
every bosom, despises it, and that common sense re-
fuses to subscribe to its being equity, which is, or
ought to be, the aim of every lewd proceeding.
But let us extend our hypothetical- case a little far-
t*, and suppose, that the charges against the ac-

---Awsma.

=-
;.....

gpoiw?Flr

;11

'tuna wife do not originate hi mistakes, arising from
hasty presumption, founded on mistaken facts butt
are the result- of a deflate fotitconipiracy to sum
the character of an, innocent and Much injured wo-
man; and let us suppose that, in the management of
the plot, it is thought necessary to get at some dom.
meats in the possession of the wife, which would ec-
pose the prosecutor; that some person, of such high
rank as to be placed beyond the suspicion of attempt.
ing to corrupt the servants of the one sought to be
ruined, abuses the rights of hospitality, and does, by va-
rious means, procure 'false keys, to gain access to desks
and escrutoires ; that the infamous attempt is disco-
vered; and that one of the servants who knew the fact,
and told it to another servant, being bribed to testify lies
against his mistress, swears that he cannot recollect
anything about that fact : we say, let this case (which,
as we have already said, we are only putting hypo-
thetically) be supposed true, and that the servant to
whom be stated the fact comes forward to testify on
oath what the other stated to him, that then common
sense would say, " Let us by all means hear this new
witness; for if, by has testimony, it shall be proved,
that in this particular (when the facts were so striking,
and their discovery accompanied with such an explo-
siorr, as could never let them escape the memory of
any one who was a party to them), the former wit-
ness swore to a falsehood, it will be impossible to
hold him as a witness whose testimony against his
mistress can be credited for a moment."—" Aye, it is
so," says Common Sense; but what says Law Tech-
nicality ? What says the hired Counsel for the sup-
posed prosecution? " Though I have expressed my
earnest wish that the innocence of the accused may
be established beyond the power of contradiction,
you shall notcalumniate my witness by the examina-
tion of counter-evidence to- prove him a liar—if I can,
by any form of law, prevent you."
What would mankind say of such conduct?—
Would they believe that the Counsel and prosecutors
were in quest of nothing but pure abstract justice?
'Not a man upon earth would believe it.
But let us return to the trial of her MAJESTY. It
is not possible that such things should occur on this
trial as we have supposed, in the hypothetical case which
we have been putting, and that for various reasons
In the first place, the House of Lords—the Judges
in this case—are, in the nature of things, " of Counsel
for the defendant," as Judges are in all criminal cases.
In the second place, they are the Court appointed
to try the cause ; because they cannot be bound by
the common legal technicalities of the lower Courts, ,
which might defeat the ends of justice, but are em.
powered, by their high office and privileges, to spurn
at every fetter which might prevent them from
probing the truth to the bottom.
In the third place, the fundamental reason of the
cause being taken under the cognizance of this tri-
bunal is, because the proceedings in a Bill of Pains
and Penalties are anomalous—unknown to the laws
of England—and therefore it is indispensably neces-
sary that those who judge in it should not be fettered
•by precedents drawn from cases to which our laws
do apply ;—a contrary procedure would involve an
absurdity.
In the fourth place.—Their Lordships are the high
guardians of the Royal Family :—not of one member
only, but of every branch and member of it :—as
much bound to protect the QUEEN, as they are the
Kis° ; and that by every means calculated to elicit
truth, in spite of every conspiracy and of every legal
"nibble; for, in this, their office is to insure justice
in the abstract, as they shall answer to both parties,
TO THEIR COUNTRY, and TO GOD.
In the fifth place, the Counsel for the prosecution
—for a prosecution we must call it—are not, neces-
sarily, counsel against the Queen. In no common
criminal, or penal case even, is the Counsel for the
prosecution a party, or conceived to have the feel-
ings of a party against the tried. It is his duty to
state what he thinks (from his brief) he can prove,
and not one word more ; to examine and make the
most of his evidence; and, in addressing the Jury,
to offer no inference that has not been established by
evidence :—if be-do otherwise, he plays the part of
a villain, and disgraces his profession. His profes-
Mona' duty goes no farther than we have stated ; and
for an obvious reason—his office of Counsel takes
not from him the character of a citizen, bound to
oak justice—pure abstract justice—to offer no im-
pediment that can defeat this object.
We remember an Exchequer case—many years
ago—in which the present LORD CHANCELLOR was
Counsel against a person charged with defraud-
ing the revenue of duty on the manufacture of paper.
The writer of this article was summoned as a Jury-
man, and was-present. The Counsel for the defend-
ant used expressions imputing, or conceiving to have,
imputed to the Counsel for the Crown, a deviation
from his duty as a public prosecutor, in the manner
in which punishment was invoked—inasmuch as, in
that character, be was bound, as much as the Coun-
sel for the defendant, to prevent any punishment, if,
bona fide, the defendant did not merit it. We can
never forget the honest but meek indignation with
which the charge, or supposed charge, was repelled.
The principle laid down by the opposing Counsel
was admitted in its utmost latitude ; and he hoped
the day would never arrive in which he should for-
get that, as a public officer, he owed protection even
to those whom he was called on to prosecute. It
was no part of his duty, by any subtlety, to fix crime
upon the Innocenti He was evidently greatly moved
while he spoke ; and the pathos with which he deli-
vered himself, produced similar feelings in all who
beard him.

But to the subject properly before us.—For an of
these reasons, and others that might be adduced, it
will be inferred by all who consider the high cha-
racter of every individual of the House of }Niers, for
independence, fidelity, probity, honour, and morality,
and who is properly informed respecting the high
legal attainments and unimpeachable character of
his MAJICSTY'II ATTORNEY and SOLICITOR.GENZILAL,
that in the important cause now going on,- none of
the Old Bailey practices will be amalgamated with
those principles of equity and abstract justice which
should regulate the proceedings of those who are as
much bound in, the eyes of Ten, and before that
IMMACULATE BEING, who " regarded) not the persons
of Ten," to render justice and protection to ow be-

Mirw.'6"'r"

~~~

loved and gracious Qum, as to our gracious an,

Kim.

But to conclude, we beg to call the attention ot.
the Public—and particularly that of the House of
Peers, to a very important fact. The enemies of the
Qutxx have talked much about a masked ball—
about her being there in a Turkish dress—and BER-
cum being there also in a Turkish dress... Their ob-
ject in all this cannot be mistaken: it was to convey
the insinuation—or rather to offer this fact as proof
—that this dress was assumed to favour an intrigue.
But " mark how a plain tale shall put them down,"
This dress, of all others that could be devised, v,•;11
thelast that could have been thought of for such
an object. It is really distressing-..at this time of
day too—when not a word deposed against the
QuEstr is believed by any person whatever
to be obliged to foul our pages with such filth
but how can it be avoided when, notwithstanding
the incalculable mischief that has already been done
to public morals, by the spread of such contami-
nating grossness, the Counsel for the prosecution
keep pressing for proof of what neither the QUEEN
nor any of her friends have attempted to deny—that
her MAJESTY was on that occasion in a Turkish dress:
but they would insinuate more, and .what success at-
tended their last attempt? look at Sir WILLIAM
DELL'S evidence. At the instance of the SOLICITORa-
GENERAL, the LORD-CHANCELLOR asked SirWILLIAst
whether, when the PRINCESS appeared in the Turkish
dress she did net wear trowsers? " I happen to know
what the trowsers were," said Sir WILLIAM " and I
beg to explain them—(Explain, explain).—They are
very much like the common petticoat, but used be-
tween the legs at the bottom!!"—A most convenient
dress truly, as the SOLICITOR-GENERAL himself must
allow, for effecting that for which, according to the
prosecutors, the dress was assumed.
One of the Noble witnesses for the Queen has
stated, that it is usual for Ladies of rank in Italy to
see company in their bed-chambers. If our Readers
will turn to The Spedator, Vol. I. No. 45, they will
see that this, no long time ago, was the fashion in
England.
" What course will Ministers pursue, now that it
is manifest they have been duped by the Milan agents
or their witnesses, or both ?" isa question in every per-
son's mouth, and the conjectures on this point are
various. It is the opinion of many that Ministers
have resolved to get rid of the Bill in one way or
other ; and that either Lord LIVERPOOL will stand
forward himself, and say that Minister; were de-
ceived ; or that the task will be thrown on Lord
LONSDALE, or some other of their friends, to move
" That this Bill be read a second time this day six
months I"

It is hoped, however, that in justice to the Iligh
Personage who has been so foully slAndered, they
will not propose any step of this kind till her MA-
Jesty's evidence, respecting what passed in the po-
lacre and at Trieste, has been heard ; And in contra-
diction of &cell is testimony.
We understand that a Cabinet Council wits held
yesterday at Windsor, attended by cll the Ministers, •
except Mr. CANNING and Lotd BATHURST. Of
course the hopeful trial was one of the principaltopica
under consideration ; but nothing has transpired re-
specting it.—We now proceed to lay before our
Readers the proceedings on
THE SIXTH DAY OF THE DEFENCE.

HOUSE OF LORDS. .
Their Lordships met this morning at the usual hour. The
Loan CRANCRLLOR took his seat on the Woolsack a few tithauses
before ten o'clock. Prayers being read, the list of the Peers was
called over. Excuses were made for several Peers who were
absent on account of indisposition. The Dukes of Nast, CLe-
arms, and CLOUCI-ITER, were present. At a quarter rat tea
o'clock Counsel were called in.

Dr. Haunt Hostas% was thett called in and sworn.
Mt/vainest by Mr. Want,
Wcre you not Physician to her Royal Highness the Princes.
of Wales in 1811 ?.—I was.

Dig you not go to Naples with her Royal Highaem?--1 did.
Did yes remain with the Princess the whole period of her
staTvhatatNaples?—l did.
don of visitors did her Royal Highness receive
at Naples?— a very few ezeeptbans, all the principal No-
bility, //Wish mad Neapolitan.
Where did you go after you left Naples ?—To Rome, aad
afterwards to Genoa.
Were you on bawd the Ciudad., with be Royal Highness?
--I was.

What class of Eton did the Princess receive at Genoa ?
Ail the English-Nobility and Gentry that were at that time in
Genoa.

Did you ever, during the period of your being with the Prin•
cess, observe her Royal Highness to avoid the linglisb ?.rI did Int.
In what situation was the Princess's house at Genoa, as to its
publicity?—About two miles distant front Genoa, ha the suburbs,
which were very populous.
Dr. Hou-sno, who possesses a remarkably One and expres-
' sive countenance, gave his answers in so low a tone of voice, that
he wits inaudible to a considerable pan of the Mose. On
which a conversation mined, in which the Loan emoseuzzas,
the Earl of Montag, the Earl of Manure, Lord Emma, and
Lord Lsonamsaur took a share, when it was agreed, that Mr.
Ginner:, the Short-hand Writer, should Always repeat the ques-
tion and answer.