Star.
London, England, 1810-11-10 00:00:00

ssez •
the fell
Allen, at

DUDLIV

decidedly.
by

Ade, as executor Allen, WiiS only ,
urinal plaintiff by st lifiinr Hay, her residuary lega-
tee, and by .whose licence; as her agent, twenty-eight
oak-trees had been cut down, as rough timber, for
the sufficient repairs of the premises ; and that as to
the thirty-five elm-timber trees) sworn to have been
felled, not one bad been cut down by thrdirection or
knowledge of the defendant ; that the cause had been
brought on unknown to the defendant, after his re-
turn last summer to his residence in Ireland, under
an assurance that it could not be tried at the ensuing
Assizes ; lad therefore he (the Serjeant) was totally
uninstructed as to a defence in such action.
Lord ELLtNIIOROUGH-i—gg Take a rule, brother
Eliepherd. Had you not tritter shape your affidavit
principally to tre elm-trees ?"
Serjeant SnEntani)--4, But, my Lord, we mean
to shew that not &fly no elms were cut, but that the
oaks were felled by the consent of the executor, Sir
Charles Melte, for the reasons) conformably to a
covenant under lease."

A rule granted—Nisi.
iN)ACUIING.---TliE KING fe. STIETTIERD AND TURNER.
This wasan indictment tried at the last Assizes for
the county of Berks, wherein both the defendants
'were charged with the crime of conspiracy, in har-
ing confederated together to set snares, for the pur-
pose of catching hares, which were stated to be " in
a certain preserve," the property of a gentleman in
,that county.
The defendants being both brought into Court,
Mr. JERVIS, their Counsel, moved an artut of
judgment upon two grounds : first, upon the ground
of uncertainty, in the words of the indictment, which
averred, that "in a certain preserve," without going ,
onto say where and what that preserve was, averred
nothing that the defendants. could reach to traverse,
and that therefore the indictment was bad. This,
ground, }however, was overruled by the Court. He
then proceeded to Ahe second ground. namely, that
the charge altogether was not an indictable offence ;
and this he illustrated with considerable effect, put-
ting to Court the danger that would inevitably arise
to the well-being of society, if a matter of this and
such like description could be conjured up into a con-
spitacy. • He urged, with great force of reasoning,
what course the law held out in such a case. He
contended, that at the utmost it conk' be considered
but as a'joint trespass, and therefore was the subject
of a civil action, not of a criminal prosecution.
The Court felt sensibly the force of these obsers a-
tions, and the motion for an arrest of judgment suc-
ceeded. The defendants then departed.

sum of, L'1,200. This sum was due frOm the deceased
husband of the defendant, for certain calls or glares
of the .Bristol Dock Company. At the commence-
ment of the undertaking a subscription paper had been
handed round, on which each subscriber put down
his name for as many £lOO shares as he thought, pro.
per ; and the late Sir Williams had taken 19
shares ; after his death, however, Lady W. when
called upon for the subscription money, refused to
pay it, upon the grounds of the instrument by which
it wai demanded, namely, the subscription paper, not
being a legal instrument, it having but one stamp
whereas, there were several signatures. Upon this
ground a nonsuit was entered at the time of the trial.
The Learned Serjeant now submitted to the Court,
however, that the British Bock Company, although
composed of several persons, yet, having but ogle
object, the instrument required but one stamp. It had
the one agiiement stamp, a 80s. and also, in com-
pliance with the Act of the 48th of the King, it had
six 20s. stamps, being the stamps necessary upon a
calculation of the number of words contained in dig,
agreement...L. Rule granted.

N.

_
12, at °array/47'1,11
IWLD ESTAT4
, and Raiabam, a shim
and within 11l elks
TC1)41411 MI.Wr ft
.eahle Farm, called 14u
and.otodective .Ir.iblt watt
c.afvetnent it drown with a
• but:awe Butilingy, aw
WIF quits et i.ady.dar
.t miry _La ran rttirt.l.l4.
lio bexiewnd. PriitqadOlorticohn.utay Its tad forthwith,.
the Protilioes. Alan at ere and (:roWa
Mr. IlitaikOrrinter;l4itdeton7; Mears. konveatni Cu. Pr!
' 4,•antedimary ; • Mains Cla 4Slanuro, sok
Lincoln:4ns ; (;'rgeVillet ; and at Maori. hkintier,
and Enrich, AlJerNtrc-suet, %here a_l!:an may be

Lpia.aotarz
•
KEN 5A.141.4.1'4014. *A
13(Mesirt,SKNI,711.7 IS, : FORIII-.%i ,
On Tisirisitay nest, Noterrairr 35, at I'2, itt
• 'lnViel.ar.
AA VERY improvable JIREEHOLD ESTATE#
.4toste in tam artolia• .otiiirlsii men sad Met .1.404 ainet
iieven pid•-• from Ashford. and a Ilion dlst.ince Iruni Swaim
Farm. •

Niarsh ; cotatisting of a Small „ at Fltoti.- to,
Meets of Land ealldd Chadetkurst ; fo,
ono Acres of P:Ature and Akahle bauJ, "pia& tiara Ind
laze in the occupation of Mr. llonms rAiamp.
'TO viewed: *ad pliatal Particulars inly be had fortlns4
of Mewl.' be*Lasutt SoUtltors, Athfurd; Mr
Blake, Printer. hfaiCstone; hicsars. Rolm asal 4,30. 'Prim
Caktertik.ry; l'essofden ; If ; Um%
Clayton, bdock. ardlihouire, solicivas, I.tra,:l.:',lna; at c.
raway's ; and of Blasts Stltttttr, Tuc!dts, auJ rorrest, Aldcos
gutr-.sett, .

- •
-- - .
Ail/CllO
Chief at the roditiVidiliug oultielitst circuit, .SA L Eg- ity. _
.r v. who had directed:itto. bp: Aft, imp kOf.4**.ipuktub- . a
1, Kr. Set. mined to the melte 'Ages. , . , • VAWASLE FAltti it++ with Pours don at
, .- Baitelers. SKINNALit, TUCHIN, mut go'
casse why Lord t turquonernon triticiiiilsistii4loll6.llfard To -aii. spa 3le aecTioN, 1
s new trial i ryatt need•not take ihe tilidUblelst.orting .y?
i. . . i on .1711rgay bent, NOTebtser 61 5., 14 12, at G,
ez Assizes, I rule until after the decision.' - ' • ,s.-.. • siiii One Lot.
fell of tirn- Mr. MALRYATT, however, tpuktimeleule. • I A V.48.Y V441114e ,FKggHoLD
len,.at Mill The A-mum-Gin:num. ngrfeld .to delay the i - 21. Agate in the -
of 1-r.rtip and Rail
grounded committal of the Defendant antil the decision of the; 4istaneellievthe ' reed to.Cant-Attry, and wi
i was fully Judges. a Mallows ; comprisim the AlLanor or otputt
dly contra. ' HART DAVIS V. LADY WILLIAIKS.
Lead., wog
Aar pa,AL
very Ca/Impact in c.aiveisient it elow
* I Ir.segberiiikb a capital :dui mat ahnirahle Faitn, et
vary
•y the only Mr. Serjeant LeNs moved for a Rule tosbewctuse eotstaibin
t Sir Chas. why a nonsuit entered in this cause should not be gei Farm-hope, ue, Brs, iltabili ziab acd.peoth,,..tive
kaothee suitable ili
y made no- aside, and a verdict entered for the plaintiff for the in the ocoupation of Mr. loon Otviett, wl.; quits
3as fentn the deceased auto when Pasclision mite fist:. The I.ustivsa