Star.
London, England, 1804-02-04 00:00:00

-SHERIFFS FOR 1804.

APPOINTED AT THE COUNCIL AT ST. JAYIETS,
ON W CCCCC DAT LAST.

lislisalike-0. Edwards, of Hallow, Efq.
Beekddre.-11 Mathews, of Wargrave, Efq.
Bee Nugent, o, Lilies, Efq.
Comb. sod H0nt....8. Keene, of Widow Lodge, N.
Cheddra.q. F. Lek-eller, of Nether Tabley, dart.
Dardiarlasid—J. Do Whe*dale, of Penritti, Efq.
Dartrylins.•Sir H. Every, at Errhsgtoo. Bart.
•
:=Zpooed.
Padoer, of Ns:log, Efq.
Moos'lasihire—N. Mord, of Pram:too upon Severn, N.
=isre—Sir C. Pool, of Modesto:et. Bart.
Biro -R. S. Fleming, of MCVAY Hill, Er+
Oarrow, of Toiteridge. Eft
KIM--I 4 W. Sterling. of Shoreham, But.
Lakederiltire.—F. W. Woll'llol, of Mentos, Efq.
Hocarolliire—R. Vyaer, Godby. Ere.

iintiki-mptontlare—C. Tetbkta, et Mean Seagrave, Efq.
Northumberland—Sir T. H. Lydda!, of Eftlemon, Bart.
Nowingtsamaire—T. W. Edge, of Strafiry, Efq.
o:for:H&c—J. Langftem, of Sarfden Hoeft, VI.
Rettlandiblro—C. Tkomproa, of Keeton, Et ,
Baby--Podponed.
Scenerfetedre—J. Rogan, of Midlevel°, Eft.
Staffordedre—R. Jam, of Weft Bronswicb, Efq.
Solfolk—Poftpboed.
Buren—W. Borradalle, er &reatham, Efq.
Stalks—J. Daunt, of Woodnuncoat, Efq.
Worniekildre-4.. Vaur:lton, of Sutton ,Efq.
Wllta—W. Lock, of Rowd Ford, Efq.
Woreefterftdre.—E. Knight. of Woolverley, Efq.
Yorkletre—J. foe, of &unborn Park, EN.
SOUTH WALES.
Carmarthen—J. Illmotont, of Umgannah, Efq.
Perobroke—Sir H. Owes, of Orichon, Bart.
Bond, of Ren-y-Coed,lll._
Glancolgan-4t. T. Mao, of Ewes. Efq.
Brecoo—P. WMlams, of Postpone. EN.
Radnor—T. F. Lewis, of Harpeowcoure, Efq.
NORTH WALES.
Merionetta—Slr E. P. Lloyd, of Park, Bart.
Carnamon-0. M. Wynn, of Pannachoo, Efq.
Analefey—T. P. Jones, of Cain Coe*, Efq.
MonegonteryC. H. Tracey, of Oreiginnog, Efq.
Denbigh—R. W. Wynne, at' Oartbewto. Efq.
08111001 ebe younger. of Leawood, Efq.

LAW INTELLiciEsGE.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH. FEB. a.
SAM V. MILLAR.

Tvrnss.—This was an action brought by the
Rater of the parifh of Camberwell, to recover the
funs of 2L tn. a companion in lieu of vibes for
ten acres of ground belonging to the Defendant, a
Shoemaker, on Snow Hill. It appeared, that, in con-
Sequence of the very great advance in the value of
I land, particularly near the metropolis, the Plaintiff,
who was entitled to recover his tythes in kind, had
thought proper to demand an higher compofition for
them than had been formerly paid : an agreement
was entered into between the parties, by which it was
undertiood the land of the defendant was to be re-
tneafured, and a competition paid adequate to its
annual rabic. Notwithtianding thi,, the defen,!Ant
afterwards refuted to have his land meafured, and
threatened to bring an altion apirall any one who
would prefume to trefpals upon it tor that purpofe.
The plaintiff demanded al. ISs. and the defendant
offered him 21. to. 3d. The former, in order to
eflablifh his claim, Summoned the defendatit to the
Court of Retillelli t but the original demand being
above 4os. the Commiffioners would not take cogni.
zance of it ; the plaintiff was therefore obliged to
tefOrt to a Superior tribunal, and bring the pefent
anion. The defendant paid the al. 141. into Court.
The evidence clearly proved that the land about
Camberwell and Peckham had, within the memory
t.f a whilst's, tripled its annual valve, and the prier of
its produce had inereafed in proper: inn ; yet the far-
Merl thOUght it 11.1,d the Clergyman Should attempt
to iscreate his Vise. The cuott94 of the defendant

• 1

setteillifitika wery,atefaetteetabie PIO tilkireyst
for k appeered he had. iteter%tar we
l'altorOlffed with tafoleace sad aboeems aesh swag
whir ktitijkars remarks. Oaths& that be wits Pk
be would make all last Cierffrimil.
ditchers. The coatiicifitstra deateaded-by r rid*
tiff was proved to be 'tamable ia the eattallse• •
Mr. GARROW, his Counfel, took occattear 1,41110.1
terve upon .tbe gender prettifies mdlittehle istme•
trylor the Clergy. He remarketl, that wane thar
farmer was enabled, by enhanciag the valet of Mi
labour, and the produce of the moth, to ansalkikhosi
and live in luxury, the Clergyman,whO wasp/oda&
ed the privileg. of adding tly Wont? to Ms Spa*
was denied his pit claim to his trims wbids belle*
as much entitled to as the farmer was to the Tema&
ing gpioths of the growth of his land. •
Lord ELLanaoactuon Paid, it was manner eisclitu
be regretted when difpntes of this fort took place he.•
tween a Clergyman and his Parilbionets. Even wheal
a Clergyman claimed what. ftrialy (peaking, be had' .
a right to receive, yet be was deferving fame blew,
if he did not rather fnbatit to a trifling •
rather than come into a Coon of Jullice bat
were limits to this forbearance, and thee, if the
demand of tl, plaintiff was, as it .appeared as boo
perfehly moderate, it was not to be a:petted that,*
&mild forego his rights. His Lindlitip flitted do
evidence, and recommended the Jury to had his the
plaintiff.—The Juiy returned a verdi& in the
tiff's favour.—Damages ys. 6d. with full costs of foil.

nave,. roves' w. THOMAS DAIIIITT.
The Plaintiff in- this rade is s Bathing Welk. it
the fuite of the Paphian Goddefs. She lid fated
up a houfe in all the parade of modern extravagakiele
in the vicinity of Fitzroy - (quer,. lusd debts andtmalliv
the natural coateiptence of Ruh profttfunt. oeolftua-
ed Come inconvenience. In there cirennsßanctul sirs
applied to Thomas Barnett, an stationer, for ens
loan of asol. which be adianced to fupply her need:
fines.; but as be was too much a man of bufinefssandt
too little a man of pleatitre, to confide in the hotfoot
and puodnality of our Britifk Afpafia. be het*
bond of the. Lady. with a Warrant of Attorttel. ep
confefs judgment, and alto a bill of tale tithe ii.fut.
pier stalks, guandoles, kr. with which her !Plena&
manfion was decorated. The audtioneer it keine
had an eye to the profits of his trade. and had lett
this money in the hope that all thee effeas woelld
pats under his own hammer. The Lxdy.hinieitle,
had no Tech defign ; the bad anfwered her imniers.
ate purpotes, and for her lets preffing ezi&ent.
the untied to the politenefs and liberality of
Antrobus, who was at Newniarket. To this GO-
tlematt ihe imparted her painful Situation.
the confidence of friendatip could alone permit bier
to difelote. The Colonel Sew to her relief, on
the wings of love, heard the painful Rory.
away the tear of iliaion, and fent for the
dant, Thomas Rupert, to difcharge the debt. A es.
rions interview took place between the Offieet and
the tradefman : the latter infißed on difpofing of the
property, or on receiving Sol. beyond the extent of
the loan. The Colonel was doubtlid whether be
Should throw this fon of Mercury behind the firs or
out of the window. Bat Love, which is draws vs-
pofiog on the paw of the Lion, toothed his indigos-
tioo. and he paid three hundred pounds. which was
the fum demanded.

This aaion was brought to recover the di/femme
between the amount of-the loan. with the events
upon it, and the fum extorted by the Defendant.
Mee's. EILSZIIIII and Ems adduced evidence
to prove the material, fast. and contended that the
bill of Cale was merely a fecuriti, and was Dot to be
conlldered as indicating any kaa tmafaaion. of
which the Defendant could avail honsfelf, u a
for retaining the fum he had received above M.
tent of his original demand.
Mr. Gas sow, for the Defeadant, argued. that a
ale of the cite& appeared on the face of the tabs.
meet, and that the Defendant bad a right to matzo
whatever bargain he pleated for the refignation of
the effeas comprifed in fuch tale. The [mph* re-
ceived, was, therefore. to be deemed the confider.
ation for the furrender of his contrail a and Ise_pra-
_

fumed, that a little left Champaigne, and a- Gals
mor; chicken hazard, would Coon net& the isms-
venidnce the Lady had &Rained.
Lord ELLEvaosouom Elated to the Jury, that the
verdie would depend upon their conftruffion ou the
bill of Cale, whether any aßnal Pale of the ere& were
intended and made, or whether it were merely a &-
mirky to which common prudence, under the dr-
cumnances of fuch a loan, would induce a tradefeeta
to retort.—VcrdiS for the Plaintiff, 33L 6d.

Festinate 3.
WEATHERLET V. JOHN WILIM, Attorney. '
Mr. EasKIRE moved tor a conditional rule again!
the Defendant, on the -following grounds. Rated in
Mr. Weatherley's affidavit, which Mr. John Wilkes
moR anfwer. which, with the final decifion of the
Twain% we Iball report.
The particulars that appeared in the preliminary
part of the cafe, which came on to-day, are as fol.
low :—Mr. Weatherley, intending to lay out a funs of
zßol. which he had by him lying idle, in the per.
chafe of a (mall elate (a profit-rent. as we underßood
it), employed Mr. John Wilkes. attorney. to prepare
the requisite conveyances, &c. Mr. Wilkes-an an
can do it better ; no man knows his profeffional ()Wi-
nd's better—prepared the conveyances, obtained the
title, and the transfer. and—iv the etetedsM. Mr.
Weathetley, when cpsarter-day came round (and Mr.
Weatherley chuckled at the thoughts of touching
fume of the fruits of his bargain). met Mr. Wilkes,
and told him he was going to demand his quarter's
rent. "Oh fie, ((aid the humane Mr. Wilkes, the
attorney) don't harafs your tenants ; I dare you,
Mr. Weatherley. the times are (it hard, you ought
to give them tome indulgence. Gcneroflty and dif-
interellednefs arc molt amiable qualities." Mr. Wea.
therley affented ; and the fame sermon about indal-
gence was preached by Mr. Wiikes repeatedly for a
length of time, until Lye qua, ten accrued due. It
is oliferved by Fielding, in fome of his mulling works,
which difplay fuch confununate knowledge of human
chwraaer, that estiewe is a vit tut. liable to fatigue by
frequent curate; Mr. Weatherley was at length tired
of indu!ging his tenants, and applied to them for his
five gnat ters rent. Their anfuer was a prodtretion
of Mr. Jrthn Wilkes's teceipts for the farm Thee
(cope of Mr. Erfkine's motion was, that the faAs tat
forth in Mr. Weatherley's affidavit Riould be anfwel,
ed, the deeds of Mr. Weatherley delivered to his,
and silo his Ire quarters rtote•-itide ruse&