Star.
London, England, 1819-11-10 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

x

Ir
I

.II!

1

i 1

1

, so.

,S
S

•• ..,..

COURT 0? CHANCERY, NOVEMBER 9.
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. BULLER.
The LORD-CHANCELLOR stated, that he had been
prevented last night from drawing up the order which
he intended to make in this case, and which he wished
to draw up with his own hand. He announced,
however, that he should bring it down with him to-
morrow morning, and should then state such obser-
vations as the case had suggested to him.
BROWN V. DE TASTET.
The Court was occupied during the greater part
of the day in hearing the several Counsel for the re-
spondent in this Appeal, the nature of which we
stated in yesterday's Report.
Mr. WETHERELL, for the appellant, made an ani-
mated and eloquent reply.—Judgment on Friday.
ARRIVAL OF THE LORD MAYOR.
At half-past one o'clock the Hall was completely
crowded, to see the new Lord Mayor sworn in. The
Lord Chancellor immediately went to his private
room and put on his state robes, with which in a
short time he returned to the Court. It would be
impossible to give any account of the confusion
which prevailed when the new Lord Mayor entered
the Hall. He was greeted with the warmest ap-
plauses, while Alderman Atkins, on the contrary,
was assailed with hisses, groans, cries of " Fire,
fire ! Murder, murder !" &c. and every mark of po-
pular indignation. The noise in the Hall prevented
the business of the different Courts, for a short time,
in going on. The Lord Mayor was attended by the
late Lord 'Mayor, Aldermen Wood, C. Smith, Cox,
and Thorpe, the Sheriffs, the Reemder, Common
Serjeant, City Counsel, and a numerous body of the
Corporation. The Procession entered each of the
Courts, and invited the Judges to dinner.
The Lord Chancellor rose before two o'clock.
vICE-CITANCELLOR'S COURT.
ATTORNEY-GENERAL TIIE MAYOR AND conronA-
T:ON OF READING.
Mr. PARSER stated, that this was an Information
fled by the Attorney-General, at the relation of
John Burke and others; and the Bill prayed that
tl.e will of a testator might be carried into effect, as
far as roi,:arded a bequest made to a Charity in
Reading ; and that the defendants, who were the
Trustees under the will of the testator, might be
ordered to produce an account of the manner in
which they had appropriated the rents and profits of
the trust Estate.
Mr. HART said, it was unnecessary to enter into
a detailed account of the testator's will, as the Cor-
poration of Reading did not claim any beneficial in-I
terest in the bequest; nor was it alleged that they
had laid out the money for their own benefit. The
present Information was filed for the purpose of ap-
plying the entirety of the Estate to that individual'
Charity for which the donor intended it. The tes-,
Bator bad bequeathed a sum of money to be laid out
by the Trustees in the purchase of property, which
should yield Annuities of £5O. and £lO. to a Charity
in Reading. The Trustees had accordingly laid it
out as directed, and had continued to pay to this
Charity the two Annuities of E5O. and £10; but the
surplus arising from the increase of rents they had I
applied to other charitable purposes.
Mr. BELL, Counsel for the defendants, did not op-
pose the prayer of the Bill.
Isis lloNtine granted the order for the production
of Accounts.
COURT OF KING'S BENCH, NOVEMBER 9.
CORONER'S INQUEST AT OLDHAM.
Mr. ::caRLYTT moved for a Rule to shew cause
why a Criminal Information should not be filed
against two petsons, named Joseph Taylor and J.
Ettrnshaw, inhabitants of the County of Lancaster.
'I he application, he said, was founded on the affida-
vits of John Mellor, a constable of Oldham, L. Far-
rant, Esq. one of the Coroners • for the County of
Lancaster, and John Jackson; and the ground of the
application, was a contempt imputed to these per-
sons, for using improper means to influence the minds
of a Jury, summoned to hold an Inquest. It was
stated in the affidavits, that, on the Sth of Septem-
ber, a Jury was summoned for the purpose of hold-
ing an Inquest of the death of a person named John
Lees. The Inquest was held before Mr. Farrant,
the Coroner, nt Oldham, where a number of persons
had a deep interest in what was passing, and were
desirous that some conclusion should be formed as
to the cause of the death of the party mentioned.
Mr. Justice BAYLEY—What was the day on which
the Inquest wa,; held ?
Mr. SCAnt.ETT—I believe it was the 7th Septem-
ber. The Inquest was adjourned from day to day,
and at length it was adjourned from Oldham to
Manchester. The Coroner and 'Mr. Mellor state,
that this latter adjournment took place with a view
to the safety of the persons attending the inquest,
and for the presentation of the public peace. For
this reason, Mr. Tarrant states, he thought it to be
1-. s duty to adjourn the Inquest from Oldham to
Manchester, where lie thought there would be more
safety in sitting. It appears from these affidavits,
that during the Inquest, one of these persons against.
whom I move, Mr. Earnshaw, a Surgeon, was called
upon to give evidence before the Jury upon the sub-
ject matter of their inquiry. Mr..Earnshaw had at-
tended the deceased during his illness. Upon Mr.
Earnshaw being called upon to be sworn, he declined
taking an oath.
Mr. Justice BAYLEY—Pray, is there any verdict
found by the Inquest?
Mr. SCARLETT—NO, my Lord, no verdict has
been found. I have no right to say so, certainly,
from the affidavits. The affidavits do not state what
the' result .of the fOquest has been. I merely make
the assertion from common report.
Mr. Justice BAYLET (after conferring with the
other Judges kr a anoment)—The verdict not hav-
ing been given, ougtht. we to interfere ?
Mr. Scaanarr-otWithout stating what the parti-
cular facts of the case are, I. will shortly state the
ground of theplication. I won't state what the
inference might, but the short ground is this
That the evidence of Mr. Earnshaw being rejected
ig a Quaker, and could not
Earnshaw, and this person
took upon themselves to
jury a written statement of
his account of the transac-
oath, he could not do. I
ip what the statement was,

before I have your judgment as to the ground of the-
motion. The paper, when produced, will speak for
itself. It is extremely difficult, in making this a
'plication, to strip myself of public rumour, which,
though it is my duty to do so, I find no easy task.'
I certainly feel it to be my duty, as well as it is that
of the Court, to disregard every thing which is not
on oath before the Court.
The CHM JusTice.—Certainly.
Mr. SCA RLETT.—Therefore it is that I wish to
confine myself strictly to what is sworn to. Upon
the rejection of Mr. Earnshaw's testimony, he being
a person of a particular religious persuasion, having
declined to be sworn, another person, a surgeon,
named Cox, was examined ; and it is stated, that the
written paper circulated afterwards amongst the Jury
was, in many respects, not consistent with the evi-
dence given by Mr. Cox. I have the affidavits of four
or five of the Jurors, together with the affidavit of.
the Coroner, to this circumstance—l have the ad-
mission of this person Taylor, against whom I move,'
that he had the paper in question in his possession,
and gave copies, or caused copies of it to be given
to all the Jurymen. I have this admission out of his
own mouth ; but I would rather state it in the pre-
cise words of the affidavit, than state the conclusion
resulting from it. The deponent states, that having
been informed that John Taylor had delivered, or
cansed to be delivered, copies of the paper to some
of the Jury, he, this deponent, according to such
information, had made inquiry into the purport of
the papers so delivered by the said John Taylor to
the Jury, respecting the death of the said John Lees ;
and this deponent being assured, that the said papers
were so circulated, and had been in the possession of
him, the said J. Taylor, and that he had delivered a
part of them to some of the Jurors attending the said
Inquest, he called upon the said John Taylor, though
he, the said J. Taylor, would not then give him any
information upon the subject. That he has since
seen the said John Taylor three times, to make fur-
ther inquiries upon the subject, and that on these oc-
casions he has been informed by the said John Tay-
lor, that the written papers so circulated were left at
his house, but by whom or with whom he did not
inform the said deponent, otherwise than that he did
not know. That the said John Taylor told him, that
no instructions were left with the papers, but that he
found the said papers in his house: that he had read
one of them, and knew what such papers were in-
tended for, and had delivered four of them to the
Oldham Jurors, and had caused the rest to be deli-
veied by other hands to the rest of the Jury. So
that here is an admission of Taylor, that he had de•
livered four to the Jurc, and had caused the remain-
der to be delivered to them. Mr. Farrant, in his affi-
davit, states, that he had been informed that one of
the Jurymen had one of these papers put into his
hands on a particular day, and that he they made
no observation, but that he had made inquiries after
the adjournment tc )k place, and learning tlttt the
papers alluded to had been distributed among all the
Jurors, he then, at a subsequent meeting, stated to the
Jury, that if such papers had been distributed amongst
them, it was their duty to deli fer them to him. That
none of the Jurors made any answer on that occasion,
but some days after they had been at Manchester, all
the Jurors, excepting one (who appears by some ac-
cident not to have received a copy), delivered the
papers to Mr. Farrant. So that it appears that all of
them had copies delivered to them except one. -I
have the admissions of four or five of the Jurors, who
make affidavits, that these papers were left with
them, but they don't say by whom, because they •
don't know. It is clear they must have received
them by one hand. So much then with respect to
the case against Mr. Taylor. Then with respect to
Mr. Earnshaw, I will state other facts that come
home to him. Certainly they are not so strong as
they arc against Mr. Taylor, though perhaps your
Lordships wilt think them sufficient to call upon him
to skew cause. It appears, that cn the 29th of Octo-
ber, one of the deponents went to the house of Mr.
Earnshaw, near Oldham, and there saw him. He,
the deponent, produced one of the papers annexed to
the affidavit, and which one is in the hand-writing of
Mr. Earnshaw.

The CIIIEFJUSTICR—It is rot a printed paper?
Mr. SCARLETT—No, my Lord.
Mr. Justice BAyr.Et—is there any thing to spew
that it was written after Earnshaw had been before
the Jury ?—Mr. Se A nrETT—I don't know, my Lord.
Mr. Justice BAYLEY—What is the date of Earn-
shaw's affirmation ?

Mr. SCARLETT—It is dated the 10th month. He
was offered as a witness before the Jury on the 2d of
October, so that it was written after he had been be-
fore the Jury. It appears, from the statement of the
Gentleman who makes this affidavit, that he called
upon Mr. Earnshaw, and asked him whether he knew
any thing about this paper? upon which Earnshaw,
told him that he was not hound to give any answer
to commit himself. The deponent afterwards asked.
Mr. Earnshaw whether he knew any thing of any
papers of a similar description having been circulated
amongst the Jury ? To which he answered, that he
had not directly nor indirectly circulated any papers'
amongst the Jury touching the death of the said
John Lees, and that such papers could not have been
addressed by him to the Jury. Deponent then asked
the said Earnshaw, whether the said paper was not
in his hand-writing? To which he answered, " 1
have not been the means of circulating it amongst
the Jury." Being requested to say whether he had
caused such papers to be circulated, he said, " I could
not tell if I was the author, until I could see what
the papers were." Therefore, my Lords, he does not
Attempt to deny that paper was his hand-writing. It
appears that one of the papers is his hand-writing.—
The others are not stated so to be. One certainly is,
and the probability is that some person had copied it
for the Jury. 1 don't say that that is so stated in the
affidavits, and I must acknowledge that Mr. Earn-
shaw does not deny or admit the paper shewa him
to be his hand-writing.
Mr. Justice BeviEv--And you have no. the testi-
mony of any other person acquainted with his hand-
writing ?
Mr. SCARLETT--.-YES, my Lord, I have the affida-
vit of a person who 'knows his hand-writing, and who
states that he believes it to be his hand-writinic.
The CHIEF Jurrtcr—He positively states himself,
that he neither directly nor indirectly circulated the
papers amongst the Jury.
Mr. SEARLETT—He does so, and, the question is,
whether the circumstances I /Me stated are sufficient

to induce the Conn to call upon him to spew cause,
why the information should not go against him ? I
take the case to be quite clear against Taylor. The
paper written by Earnshaw professes to give his opi-
nion as to the cause of the death of John Lees. The
paper is addresssed thus—" To all whom this may
concern."
The CHIEF JUSTICE—It is a paper touching the
cause of the death of the party upon whom the In-
quest was held ?
Mr. ScARLETT—Yes, my Lord.
Mr. Justice BAYLEY—I presume it was tendered
to the Jury by way of evidence, having the only
sanction which a Quaker can give to its truth, namely,
his affirmation, which sanction does not entitle it to
be received in evidence ?
Mr. Justice BEST—His affirmation had been pre-
viously refused ?
Mr. ScArtLETT—Yes, my Lord. The paper does
not point at any individual.
The CIIIEF JUSTICE—A understand the paper to
have been clandestinely delivered by Taylor to the
Jury. If the Court grants the Rule against him, it is
on this ground—that here is something delivered to
the Jury, not upon oath, touching the matter which
was the subject of inquiry. It is clear that nothing
should be delivered to the Jury except upon oa.
Mr. SCARLETT—I need not make any observations
on this part of the case, for I take it that no rule can
be more clearly established than, that during the
administration of justice, the tribunal of justice should
not be tampered with in any way whatever.
Mr. Justice BEST—There is this objection to the
proceeding, that the paper was not delivered openly,
or when the Coroner was present ; but secretly, when
the Coroner was absent.

Mr. SCARLlTT—Whatever the effect of the paper
might be, it was clearly not evidence. The founda-
tion, therefore, of this application is, that Taylor's
was the hand that put the paper in circulation. I
have stated the facts as they affect Earnshaw ; and,
with respect to the paper, I have this further to state,
that it contains matter that could not be received
upon oath, even if this person had been sworn. Hav-
ing now stated the whole of the facts, the Court will
dispose of the motion as it sees fit.

The Cuter JUSTICE—The foundation of my pre-
sent opinion, that the Rule ought to go against Tay-
lor, is, that nothing is to be deli vered-to aJury, other
than upon oath, touching the subject matter of their
inquiry. It does not appear that you have sufficient
proof is this case to criminate the writer of the paper.
As against him, your facts are not strong enough to
entitle you to a Rule, he does not appear to be im-
plicated ; but as against Taylor you may take a Rule
to chew cause. •

Rule to shew cause granted against Taylor only.

COMMERCE.

LONDON MARKETS, NOVEMBER to-

SVGA R.—The demand for Muscovades, during the
last week, was brisk and extensive beyond precedent,
towards the close of the market, particularly ; the re-
finers and wholesale grocers, who have, for a length
of time, delayed to make their usual purchases, took,
alarm at the brisk market, and, coming forward,
nearly at the same time, occasioned an uncommon
briskness ; the prices of good Sugars were Jr. to 25.1
per cwt. higher, and inferior brown might be stated
at the advance of Is. the market closing exceedingly
brisk, and several extensive holders declining to
make sales, in the anticipation of a further and con-
siderable improvement. This forenoon the great
briskness in the demand continues unabated ; not.
withstanding the extensive sales of last week, the
purchasers have come forward freely ; the total sales
this forenoon are nearly 3500 hhds. at an improve-
ment of fully Is. since Friday, making an advance of
2s. to 3s. on Muscovades, since this day week. The
demand for Foreign descriptions of Sugars has not
increased in proportion ; the public sale of Brazils,
on Friday, went off at very low rates--middling
white 345. 6d. to 555. 6d. grey s2s. to 335. brown
265. to 295.

COFFEE.—There were considerable public sales of
Coffee brought forward last week, the whole went
off rather heavily ; the ordinary to fine ordinary Ja-
maica sold 2s. to Ss. per cwt. lower ; the other de-'
scriptions were without variation, the fine still conti-
nuing to sell out of all proportion high ; fine mid-
dling Jamaica, in extensive parcels, sold 140 s. to
1435. and one lot 150 s. good ordinary sold at 108 s,
extensive parcels of Cuba and St. Domingo, Coffee
were brought forward, the former, fine ordinary, all
withdrawn at 1425. but no offers near that rate ;
for good St. Domingo 107 s. 6d. was offered and re-
fused. The demand, by private contract, yesterday
and this 'forenoon, appears to be considerably re-
viving ; for good ordinary St. Domingo 108 s. has
been realized.

COTTON.—The accounts from Liverpool and Man-
chester are exceedingly favourable ; the purchases of
Cotton are represented to be extensive, the prices im-
proving ; these accounts have, however, little effect
on this market ; the purchases, since Tuesday last,
little exceed 400 bags-170 Berbice and Demerara,
very middling to find, 15}d. to 160. a few good Ca-
riaceu Mid. very good Jamaica 14-id. very middling
Barbadoes 12id. inferior Montserrats 100. middling
St. Domingo 110. fair Carthagena 101 d. to lOid.
fair new Orleans 14d. to 14t,d. 4.0 fair shipping qua-
lity Bengals bid. to 7-Id. and 20 Surats Bid.
Wan PROVISIONS.—There are about 400 casks
of new Beef arrived, the prices are, however, nominal.
The old, and the prices of Pork, remain nominally
the same. Butters are heavy.
RUM, BRANDY, AND HOLLANDS._The Rum mar-
ket was heavy last week ; the purchases reported
were limited ; no alteration in the price,'could be
stated. Yesterday the Government Contract of
60,000 gallons was concluded, at prices so low as
2s. lid. per gallon ; the report of the low rate will,
probably, have an unfavourable eßet on the mar-
ket. The few sales eBl•cted this forenoon are at lower
rates than the holders would accept of last week.—
Brandy is exceedingly depressed.
HEMP, FLAX, AND TALLOW.—The prices of Tal-
low continue very much depressed ; the market is
still very heavy. Hemp may also be purchased on
lower terms. Flax continues very heavy.
OILS.—The prices of Greenland Oil may again be
stated at a considerable reduction. Southern Oil is
also lower. The other descriptions are heavy. -
looroo.--The demand for Indigo, since the East '
ladia sale, bits slot bens extensive; several parcels.,

have, however, sold at the advance of al
but, generally, the improvement on the sale
not.so considerable.

LIVERPOOL, NOVEMBER 6.
The stock of Cotton, in the hand, of the
and spinners, having been much reduced,
quence of the smallness of their purchases ,
last few weeks, the trade have, this wee', cc.Te
ward and purchased freely : on Tutsd,iv
became very animated, and has since central
prices have advanced id. per lb. in Boweds,(
and Brazils. The sales of the week
Boweds 12id. to 13d. for ordinary to fair,
13,iti. for good fair to very good, a few piiine
15( 0 Orleans 124,d. to 130. for ordicary
13i0. to I.sid. for good ftir to good, ai,,e;
17d. 90 Tenessees 'lid. to 121150 Sea
to 2s. sd. for middling to good, and a few
1600 Pernams 17d. to 18id. 2300 Maranhol•
to 16}d. 250 Bahias 16d. to 17d. 900
13d. to 130.50 Minas Novas 1r,.';(1. 100
16i. to 18d. 30 Carthagenas 111 d. 10 Ma.;:as
260 Surats 7id. to 81d. for ordinary to
10d. to 100. far good ; 316 Bengals T;(l.'
middling to fair, Bid. to 8?d. for good fair to
making, altogether, 11,905 bags. The .17,;
only 4.600 bags.
By public sale of Wine, 4th inst.--5I pipes
Cape Madeira 4:20. 10s. and £2l.
About 750 libels. Sugars sold Is. to 13.6 d.
dry browns 535. to 565. Molasses dull, a few
Antigua and Jamaica sold 255.6 d. to 255. sd.
is a fair demand for Coffee ; good ordir
miugo, mixed with black beans, sold 10Is.,
mon pale 995. to 100 s. partially damaged
holders now ask is. to 2s. higher ; ordinary 7
rara sold at 103 s. good fine ordinary 105 s. to
middling 116 s.

GLASGOW MARKET, NOVENIREBs i.

CorTos.--The sales of the week amounted
packages, Sea Islands 31, at 2s. 3d. to 2s.
Boweds 125, at 12d. to 1 3id.—Orleans 56, at ,
15 ad.—Tennessee 20, at 12d.—Demerara 57, it
to 15!,d.—'_',d.-st India 11, at 12id. to 1.4,1.-
40, at Sad. By A uction—Boweds 71, at W. v.
Orleans, 37, at 14 d, to 13ie.._1;mvila 28, at 1
The Importers of Cotton Woollkot Glasgow, •
ed, on the 2d inst. the following RegulationF,
will be found of importance to the trade

I. That, from and after the 2d of Ncvember;-...
credit, on all kinds of Cotton Wool. shall lie four-m.ni
when ca.h is paid, if within ten days from the date
allowance of two pet cent. will be given.
2. That the Tare shall be four lbs. per cwt. on all
Cotton Wool.

BENGAL, NAY 13.
The quantity of -Cottoil of the new crops
has yet come to market, is very small, which
partly be accounted for by the navigation of the
tabange River, &c. not Leing yet entirely free
interruption. It is not likely it will arrive, in
considerable quantities, till towards the en,l of
There has been little business done in Cotton yr
good new Cutchorn is held at 14 or 15 rupees]
but there is no disposition shewn to purchase at
rates.

SPARRING.— Tom Otnen had a benefit at the
Theatre, Catherine-street, on Monday ; and
to be genteel, the performances commence
skim to the Richards at both the Winter

at play-house time. The setting-to was not t_
of the Fives-court kind, as only Shelton, Purcell,
Turner, of the regular millers, set-to. The of
formances consisted of flooring matcher,
some rough water-side lads, who could stand
and tear. The stage was roped round, and the
assemblage remained until the candles were bt
Just published, by T. HARVEY, of BI Ici
road, a Pocket Manual, being A few Minutes
vice from the Medical Board, in a Lecture
Luas Venerea and Sexual Debilities, as deli.
ed at Woodstock-House, and Charlotte-House,
March last, a Publication highly in,
young Practitioners, and of importance to the
interests of Society.—For the acct
Patients at the West end of the Town, a
Board is established in Woodstock-street,
street, under the patronage of Dr. Coot
tom House, Great Charlotte-street,
The Board is composed of Gentlemen of the
talent, of nearly forty years' experience, all -
of the Royal Colleges of London and Lu.
who are consulted daily by all ranks of
lids with the greatest confidence. Patients
with a certain complaint, strictures, erratic
eruptions of the skin, ulcerated throat, gh
swellings in the neck, nodes on the slain bones,
are diseases which arise from improper _
the afflicted are immediately relieved, and speec
cured, without confinement.—Messrs. COOPER
are consulted at Woodstock House, from Eight
Morning until Eight at Night ; and at Cl'
House, Great Charlotte-street, opposite the
Rowland Hill's Chapel, from Twelve till
and no where else in London.—Mechanics have
vice Gratis every evening, from Six till Eight,
both Houses; and on Sunday Mornings until Ti
o'Clock._N.B. Ruptures of 30 years standing,
of 24 inches in circumference, radically cured, w;
out surgical operation.-0- Private Entrance,
Private Rooms, for Consultation.

S by the Coroner (he being :
take an oath), he, Mr. Ea
named Taylor, afterwards
circulate amongst the Jur
Mr. Earnshaw, giving his
. tioe, which, even upon os
won't state to your Lordshii

of 31 t„,
tm
,n the sale prke
11 RR. 6.
I‘l,, of the de
reduced, ir. cc 7
purchases
S cr.Te •
icsd,iy the den
ace ccntir.lect
t Bowed; ,
week
y to fair, I%e.
a few prim,
)r ordicary to f
good, a i,:v; ri
50 Sea
!da few
Maranlrlol.
)00 (;.-
,d. 100 I)err.;;;..
I. 10 Mad:•as 1 1
;vary to rnidtr
;als d. to Se,
ood fair to
The ar,:vals
t.--51 pipes • ,
. to ls. 6d.1. .
s dull, a few
to 255. 9d.
d ordinary a
)1d 101 s. 6d.
damaged 9,!,
; ordinary
ary 105 s. to le.
EMBEFfs I. •
amounted to
3d. to
[cans .56, at ILL
merara 37, rat
to 1413.—8er„
vc,,la 28, at 12i
t Glasgow, adfi
tegulationF,
trade in genet ;
ember;-the p.ri
be four-ernratti;
in the date of *air,
r tart. on all kid,
3.
new crops
imall, which 7
igationef the
entirely free i.
ill arrive, in
s the end of
in Cotton yet;
r 15 rupees 11,
purchase at •
nett at the 31;
lay ; and in or •
imenced, in op
Winter Thea
was not end
Iton, Purcell, a
The ott.e...fu
atches, hem!,
could stand w
Id, and the mot:
es were bur:lto;
of BI
few Allitartes
a Lecture on 1..-
ties, a delix
arlotte-House,
y interesting.
.ance to the v.
:commodatioa
['own, a Medic
k-street, Oslo
;DOPER, of Chu
Blackfriars-r.
!men of the 6
ace, all Mem,
and Editibur
ranks of inv
Patients afflic
es, erratic pax
hroat, glanduiu
e shin bones, is
oper treatment 7
ed, and spee,4
i. COOPER andCo
rom Eight inet
nd at Charlotte-
pecricii
etl
hanksel t hli
agevhEetilte
e.
,gh2
at
rags until Twelve
irs standing, and
ally cured, wat•
le Entrance, and
in William lien:2d,
r of tie late Licom•
og, Esq. Carleten,
he late tier. Race
ill, RN. to Selina
es Bishop, Tug. to
sander M'Clabbit,
rieff, Esq. Car°.
is, Mr. John Mae
11(0W.
tr. Bryan M'Swilie,
PaPer•
Rev. John Collier,
loop Mr. Gerber,
ice of a Missirr.l
Church Missiunrf
Kiety, he actor')
int its object!. He
st engaged in b..^
0 the grave by t'7e
ectable inhab.tar:s-
-
-
KIIVT, DACIA