Star.
London, England, 1817-07-15 00:00:00

SPOI:7 IVG.

Or elm.; ON TI:E MINCASTr.R
,I.l.EGlii2 s I.r 14.
5! tot apt Ale. Watt's c. by Whitelock.
t Sir T. Staril-0. li ire 1.
(1 I av,-t I) Ow nt
2tq 1 .•T on's S!a'ssborough.
' 0.. ; tig-t itir. Pletcher'.
-t to 1 J„....! Sr. Catter•on's saber Robin.
. 4 to 1 Isz.l Air. War's ch. c. by Ccrl):
EW:11:112:;.E. r
5 t.) 1 .i.rt Mr. pApie's Asor, brother til
rsr;,••, rut v.:- NI Al WOR ?AO' ,01:1 SCA enr. ;.-6trvcii;
dav'• talk s• varier para ehdtt o'clock oil Sunda; tazitt
~.•• tit -zo miles. lie started agYnyt-rerlay tarn-ring
-•rir.t. • beton• hve, ant! f -or in d,.• afternoon had
. ,at k v.z. so Hie ev:u3l, 27!) nal,. and I LOC, bud:ward..
.],y. Ilar: is, a atockaiz of Carli-le, for
117 Is 3. ru 103. nd. undertook r.. Long•OWfl
7.4 Ali i!. in three boor, ; however,!uht lits
two and a hall.
Ihe wand maid, Lord'i Croton!, between the
r • . .I".tisitt that wa• tLettled oa 1 riday iu
111.• Grand Cricket 1-latch at I.nra'qaGrreisi,l, between eleven
edocated at l.t.as, agaa:.,t eleven Geod.:men 01 ling'
W 43 decidel on Satarday in favour of laiglantl.

1.411' INTELLIGLATE.

CCURT 01' CHANCFRY, JULY 11.

CA.W. TO PRO I'ESIANT
t. AND S'fti••V.Uß' V I'KAItsoN AND orileu.s.

Tnis else, which excited considerable interest from
iin;oetance to the Dissenting Clergy, came on
y betree tte• Lotto Cuareortranft at Lincoln's
rut Hail. It was iii!ormat:on filed by his Ma.
city's Attorney-General, at the instance of Ben-
nutoder and the Rev. John Stewart, against
l'earson and other., trustees of a Dissenting Chapel,
vr;teing ti! Cow t to grant an injunction to restrain
D .fend vile from proceeding at law by an eject-
It .4e:reared that in 1701 a piece of ground
ta.t 1-o.'f.`ll lett by an individual for the purpose of a
Ceapel being boil! " for the worship of Goo," and
etas an acre of 1 end (c•alleit the Ten-fields) with
other property, for the endowment of that Chapel.
Toe question now before his Lordship was, whether
n (:iapef which had been originally endowed for one
purpose, could be empl eyed to another end than what
was originally intended, or, in other words, whether
Unitarians had a right to occepy a Chapel which
originally WAN intended for Trinitarians?
Sir S. Rostiti.v, Messrs. Haiti., SIIADWELI, and
Cr .% were C woad for the Plaintiffs. They con-
tended, that in the well-known case of the Attorney-
General t. Fourier, his Lordship had, after a patient
inves:kation of facts, held, that an institution of the
same nature as the one now under discussion, was
to be considered and acted on the same as any other
public charity, and therefore there could be no pus-
sible deuht on that head. T:fe point. therefore, now
to be agitated WAS, whether the Court should permit
t!:.! ;sei SOPS invested with such a trust. to act in a
manner as would infallibly destroy it? This place of
worship was now occupied by Unitarians, and the
ouestion was, whether or not this had been the origi-
nal des;gn of the founder? It could not be his de-
sign, becluie a: t e time he feurided it, Unitarianism
was and na public place of worship on that
system could exist. It was still ill% ii, because the
recent Act only removed the pana:ties attached to
the profession of that opinion, but did no more.—.
Mr. !•7.ewart h.id, it_ seemed, changed his opinions
s.hd become a Triiii:arian ; and surely this was so
well; considering that he thereby became more
orionant to the spirit of the founder. While the act
of the founder gave the trustees a power to elect the
Cergyman, it was his Lordship's duty to determine
whather it was ever intended that by such a power
beitio.o conferred on them, they thereby became en-
titled to any capricious power over any person ap-1
pointed to the living, for it had ever been the policy
that Court to prevent the holder of any living,
whether Schools or Churches, (nun being dependent
on the )ropk, as it evidently followed, that unless a
Cl:repo-4n was so situated, he became the tool of
his fl ick, and must in fact conform to whatever
system of truths they chose to prescribe to
The Trustees had chosen to engage this individual
for three years only. Now was this within their
powers ? The trust deed declared the ;ncumbent
should be for life, or at least while the said incum-
bent discharged his duties faithfully, and conducted
himself as a moral character ; that he bad been at-
tentive to his duties, and was also a most respectable
individuil as to morals was not denied, but yet they
say, that As he was only engaged for three years,
and as that time had expired, be ought to resign...r.
Allowing this for a moment, why bad the other side
permitted him to preach three months longer than
his engagement ? lot they thus acknowledged, that
in engaging him for three years, they had done what
they had no legal power to do, as it was clear the
founder had looked to the incumbent having perma-
nent possession, or he never would have founded the
living. Mr. SHADWF.LL particularly argued, that it
was impossible for a moment to suppose the Chapel
had heen intended for Unitarians, whose principles,
us Lord Raymond had justly observec', struck at
the very vitals of Christianity, and who, as he ap-
prehended, had no legal authority to propagate their
doctrines.—[The Learned Gent.eman here took a
most luminous review of the doctrines of Christianity
established at the Reformation, and sanctioned after-
wards by many Acts of Parliamentj.—Besides,
though the Plaintiff had been elected for three years,
he had nevertheless, by acting three months longer,
become the Clergyman de facto of that Church.
The LORD CIIANCELLOIL.... How many Defendants
ore there here, as I observe you should have twelve
Trustees ?
T•le Sotacitron.Gewen,it.—My Lord. there are
only sir, and Mr. Maunder makes seven altogether.
The Lotto CIIANCELLOR.-1 apprehend the first
thing this Court does is to take care that the legal
estate be filled up ; and I remember a decision of the
Mous? of Lords from Scotland, where their Lord.
ships declared, that a Chapel built expressly for one
purpose could not be converted to another.
M:. SHADWIZI.L.—Then, my Lord, I need say no
Mort; ii,is dacides my case in my favour.
Toe SOLICITOR-GENERAL (who for the first time
addressej Lois Court) said, he was instructed to op-
pose the motion for an Injunction, while at the same
he was aware there had been too much irrele-
vara matter introduced on this • occasion. He was
clearly of opinion that the superintendence of this
Chapel was vested in the majerity of Trustees, and

his clients, therefore, constituting the m2l3rrty,- had
just done as they had a right to J. and he contend-
ed that the Court could not deprave them of their
trust, unless it was proven they were guilty of violat-
ing that trust. tie lamented that the trust deed had
been drawn up in so general terms, and expressed
%ineerc wish that it had particularised the doc-
trines which were to he taught in the Chapti, but he
could hot _ce why thee doctrines dinold row/ be the
subject of discussion before the Court. The conduct
of Nlaturiers sttem:tel to him somewhat singular, and
he must nay that it was extremely unaccount able
why that individual, who was appointed a Tr usteeoin
17:32, and had kilw.un that Unitarian doctrines were
inculcated lit the Chapel, shoald now kr the first
tins: come forward in to declare his aversion
to tliet,.! doctrines. As he unquestionably kace: these.
doctrines were taught, why had he not sooner coon-
manfully forward to avow his dissent from them, an!
his conviction that they were contrary to-what the
lounger designed: Much had been said by his
Learned Friend, Mr. litiadvrell, respecting the dan-
ger aii,ing irons such doctrines, but he thought the
/glut patandi of such a charge lay on the pl sintilfs,
who were sorely bound to make gond their cause.—
He contended that there was no yne,.icn at all bzlote
the Court respecting the nature tit the doctrines, and
all that was insisted for was, that the Defendants
had a right to do as they had done in virtue of
the mutt deed.
The Lotto CoANcLuon.-1 want to know, Mr.
S•dicitor7General, does this famous deed say one
word about the election of the Minister or Clergy-
man ?

The Sock:iron GEseitai.• —1 believe not, mr Lord•
Leo CIIANCELLOR.—AiI ! that, however, is very
important to the question, for allow me to say, that
nothing can be more important than this. We in
this Court hav'e had many c..ses about popular coils
to livings, and also about Trustees ; but I have
alv►ays thought and held, as Ido in this case, that
where the constitution of a trust is darkly expressed,
you can only learn it from what has been the uniform
usage in electing persons as Clergymen or Trustees
under that trust. It is not from the practice of a day,
but from uniform usage you can learn thus.
Mr. BENVON and Mr. Pion.List.na, on the same
side, contended, that though Sir Samuel Rot:rids and
the other Counsel had argued th•rt the living was to
be held 6, iamdiu sc brae geiscrit," still it was obvious
that the agreement was binding on all parties, and
that by the char ter Mr. Maunder could not act as a
Trustee, having vacated his trust by lung absence.
It was .mportant this question should be settled, to
prevent further contests.
The LORD CDANCELLOR.-4 never heard it before
said in this Court, that the contests of parties in a
cause of this kind wawa cause why expedition should
be used in giving a decision.
Sir SAstura.ltostrux made a moat ingenious reply,
And at considerable length entered into the merits of
tire case. He contended, no benefit could result to
the congregation from the ejedtment ; that the charges
again►t Mr. Maunder were unfounded, he having
never left Wolverhampton ; and that in a question
of this kind it was morally impossible the doctrines
of the party should not be discussed. He was clearly
of opinion, that if a sum of money was left for the
purpose of propagating Unitarian doctrines, this
Court would not sanction it; though at tire same
time he was prQud•to witness that liberality of senti-,
ment which at present pervaded the country, and by
which the Jew and Chri►tian were equally protected
in worshipping the De!T•tr according to the dictates
of conscience, " none daring to make them afraid."
This was just as it should be, and would, he trusted,
for ever be the case in this country—as he I►ad yet
to learn why men should be prohibited from offering
that homage to the DEM which •an enlightened
heart and understanding dictated. But in the ease
he had put, he was sure no Court would ever sanc-
tion such a grant. He lett his cause in his Lord-
ship's hands with lull confidence of its meeting that
impartial attention and just decision which his Lord-
ship always gave to every case.
The Loan CHANCILLOR—This case involved so
many points of importance to the Dissenting interest
and to the public, independent of its importance to
the parties, that ire should not feel himself justified
in deciding it at present. He understood the law of
William 111. as respected the Unitarians, and the
Scottish laws also, had been repealed. It he was
nut mistaken, death was the punishment attached to
the violation of these laws.

Sir S. Rourf.t.v—Yes, my Lord, for in the time
of King William one man was tried and executed.
LOUD CHANCELLOR—He was glad they were re-
pealed, and that a bill also had passed fcr the same
purpose, relative to Ireland, last week. He deeply
lamented religious disputes, as they had always
been found to be the most inveterate, and the most
difficult of being reconciled. After stating a few
general observations on the law of the case, his Lord.
ship said he should certainly take home the Bill and
Answer, and read them over carefully. If deeds
were drawn too loosely, and in too general terms, he
could only say that the blame solely attached to these
who drew them. Ou Thursday he should give his
judgment in this case, which was one of the deepest
importance. •
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, HILT 14.
BELL V. DONAVAN.

This an, action brought against the defendant,
owner and master of the brig Crocus, to recover the
money paid for a passage to Gibraltar, and compen-
sation in damages for the injury sustained by the
plaintiff in consequence of the defendant's sailing
away without due notice, and leaving the plaintiff
behind. It appeared in the course of the examine.
tions, that the vessel was detained in the Downs by
contrary winds, from the 26th December to the 9th
January; that the passengers in consequence were.
suffered to go on shore and live at their own expense,
the Captain undertaking to hoist a signal whenever
there should be a favourable change in the weather.
If he sailed at night, the appointed signal was to be
two lanterns in the shrowds. It appeared that there
had been some previous" disagreement between him
and his passengers ; and that he bad been heard to
speak disrespectfully of them, as a d—d queer set,
they having refused to accommodate him with re-
gard to the dinner hour. The wind changed on the
evening of the sth of January, and the Captain pro
ceeded to get under weigh abbut eight o'clock ; he
hoisted the lights at twelve, but they were not per-
ceived by the man whO watched for the passengers

till !rapast one, when the peteeneere were Collected,'
and induced to take a boat to proceed on board. The
vessel did not, however, bring-in, although the boat
followed it fr< m the coast of Deal te that of Dover.
A gq4A deal of contradictory evidence was given wish
regard to the notice, and the means taken to apprize
the passengers -1 the vessel's departure ; but the Jury
found ea verdict for the plaintiff, who had been obliged
to wait three weeks tertore he could procure a passage
in another vessel.—Damages 470.
COURT OF COMMON 1):.9.,5i, DUBLIN, JULY 9.
CON.-111tOWNE V. BLAKE.
Mr. Hoi.weu. WAeses °prated the pleadines. He
said that the plaintiff in this case ..vas Mark Browne,,
Esq. and the defendant Martin Jos ph Blake, Esq.
This action was for criminal conversation with the'
plaintiff's wr‘..e, and the damagee were laid at ie,to.ooo
Mr. Pone tes sf ited t'ee pl iintifl'e case. He la-
mented the corruption of morals in the present age,
the pestiferons contagion of which had even infected
in an alarming degree thebeAsted purity and chastity
of Irishwomen. He called upon the Jury to express
their execration of the crime of the adulterer, and
arrest his progress by their verdict ; ohservine, LI) t ii
vice enough had crept in -amongst us to cowrie this
Abominable crime, he was certain there was virtue
sufficient in this country to brand it with infamy, aild
justice enough to visit it with exemplary purishment.
A. Browne, Eeq. knows the plaintiff, Mr. M'rk
Browne; he is a young man of :thou: fle years of
ages entered into the marriage state with Miss Blake
in the year 1811. She is a .young Lady of about
three and twenty years of age at present. ‘Vit ness
was present at the marriage, which was solemnized
by the Roman Catholic Ilielifip of 'Nam'. Mr. and
Mrs. Browne were both of that religion. Mr. Browne,
at the time of his marriage, possesse-1 a fortune o'
se`2,ooo a.year, and is of must respectable family and
connections. Mrs. Browne was uncommonly hand-
some. Witisess, since their marriage, had been mo
intimate in their family, and of course had full and
frequent opportunity of seeing their manner of lacing
at their seat, Rocktield, in the county of Galway :
they appeared remarkably find and attached to each
other; never saw a couple more affectionate and
happy. Mrs. Browne was a clever woman, and had
the management of all the money matters. Mr.
Browne was very much attached to the pleasures of
the turf ; and two or three years after his marriage,
being rather unfortunate in his bets., hurt his fortune
materially : his affairs, in consequence, became
very much embarrassed, and on one occasion he
was obliged to conceal himself for some time,
at his house in the County of Galway. Mrs.
Browne bad then the sole management of his busi-
ness, and acquitted herself with ability and credit.—
The husband kept at this time wholly at home, and
his why transacted all his business abroad, and atten-
ded the meeting that season at the Curregh. Mr,
Browne kept a plentiful and hospitable table, accord-
ing to the custom of his country ; there were occa-
sionally several visitors there; Mr. Blake, the present
defendant, was a 'favourite and constant visitor there
during the last year, 1816, and beginning of the pie
sent ; the whole family were very attentive to, and
fond of him. Mr. 13:0 wife never expressed to witness
any suspicions of Mrs. Browne being attached to Mr.
Blake ; nor did he (the witness) ever sec any ins:mire
of particular mien:ion from Mr. Blake to Mrs. Browne
but once; particular business brought Mrs. BroWne
up to Detslin ; he (the witness), Mr. Blake, and ano-
ther friend, were also in town at the time. Mr.
Browne was to come up and jnin her immediately.
she put up at l.ennon's Hotel, in Sackville-street;
the persons before-named supped, and sit together
until eleven o'clock, when he (witness), and the other
Gentleman (Mr. Robert Power), arose to go away;
they expected Mr. 13141te would here dome away will
them ; they ateed him to do so, but lie paid no atten-
tion to what they said, and they went away without
him. Witness conversed with his companion on the
' suspicious appearance of this circumstance, and ex-
pressed his intention of communicating it to the lius-
band when he should arrive; but atter they had talked
it over, they thought it would be better not to let the
husband know any thing of the matter, p.trticularly
as Mr. Blake said was shortly to go to France,
for which purpose he had then come to Dublin. Mr.
Blake had a sister and brother, who had been educa-
ted in a convent, and were visitors with hurt during
the I.ttter part of 1816. and beginning of this year,
11 at Mr. Browne's residence.

Cross-munind.—Mrs. Browne is young, cheerful,
beautiful, lovely, and lively ; her husband is also
young, and has no vices; except horse racing, a
little gambling, sontztimes pretty deep drinking ;
heard him of ten talk of his amours since his marriage;
when he heard him talk so, considered it as boasting;
this was over their' wine after his marriage ; he is,
nevertheless, a goad man, and was an affectionate
husband: never heard him talk so at his fire side, or
in the presence of his wife ; never heard him boast
of having carried on amours in his own house. Mrs.
Browne, at the time her husband was obliged to con-
ceal himself, attended the Curragh Meeting in his
stead. Mr. Browne is also fond of cock.fighting ; he
has attended some matches of cock-fighting since his
separation from his wife, and the commencement of
the present action.
.1. Rude has known Mark Browne for many years;
remembers Mr. Browne and Captain Burke going
together from Rocklield, for a day or two, to
way ; they went on a Satin day. and welt; a. return
on Monday. Remembers Mr. Blake came to Rock-
field before their return ; knows a place in the
county of Galway called Ado nry, about two miles
from the Plaintill's house ; saw Mrs. Browne go out
to walk on foot there one of the days her husband
was absent ; she remained out about two hours•l
and a halt; it was on Sunday, in the month al
January ; it was a very disagreeable day, rained
heavily; she went out the next day. Monday the,27th,
to take the same walk ; it wai not so bad a day as
the former; witness was surprised she would go out
in such unpleasant weather without a carriage.—
Monday evening Mr. Browne returned home. Mrs.
Browne employed the Saturday, January 25th, when
he was gone, in writing and burning letters. Knows
Roger Byrne, a servant of Mr. Browne's, saw Mrs.
Browne give him a packet. Recollects the moron%
' of Tuesday the with of January ; m t Mrs. Browne
on the top of the stairs of her own house ; she wa:
then coming down stairs front the bed-chamber storey;
it was they about half-past eight she was dresse,
very lightly; sbe had on a short bed-gown, a loos•
night-cap, and he thinks no p'etticoat. During al

the tame h. iliac, Mr. and AT-". Browne, he tiliffer
saw a more lovingo,r happy ci•ulsle.
Crory-ex.,:r?incd.—Never he ird Mr. Br %vile boas:
of his gallantrie‘.. pith. r before or after dinner. Said
he.saw Mrs. Browae, i;ono :.fier he met tier undr.'ssed
on the st tire, in the p irlatrr, •:nd Mr. lilak in lit
undress talking to her ; bot t was a treed:it') iso
way particular in that p tof tLa country. Mra.
Browne told him when shaeartre b im her w-lk
in Athenry, that she laid beet. to th:i liri ,st. Mr.
Cumming, the pain:er, was a favourite guest, at d
oft :a walked and rode out with t! e lady.
(4t.liq P. J. le. an Otlicer in army, tea
at Mr. Browne's lii.ase cm Saturn! c 2i;.:1 of Ja-
nuary last; accompanied Mr. Brown that day to
GaiWAT, and to ,k Oran Castle, the reuidt.n.:? of
Mts. Bro Nee's 1.:02er, iu their way ; left b.l.ind thee:'.
at Rocky:ell!, bliss Silly Blak.: and her yeainger bto •
ther., Darcy, Mr. Cumming, and Mr. Hughe
they dud not retina until Monday evening. Mr.
firoxne appeated to la! an ertrcmely affectinnate
htisband ; roc:Of-co: whirr he shah at the 1111.1se tit,: he
came into his !red..; t:sir;;,-r pretty late at night, ani
coraidaiced to him. in distress, thst Mrs. Brower
was very ill ; this was oa the night of the 2'i t!: of J..
unary. on their re urn from Galway. V:ituess saw
Mrs. Browne on ch.: morning of the 24th rr J nary,
going down stairs, very lightly dressed, in a shalt be.!.
gown and her shift ; Mr. Browne was titer. in his own
room, and witness lwating him call nut several time;
went to him, and lound him much a.iatated. NVitnes;
gave orders to remove the fire arms and other d-...attalc-
tive weapons out of the roi‘m, considering it flange.
roils to leave them there. in con,eque!.ce of Mr.
Biuwne's slat': of nund. Mrs. Browne was sent away
the day after. Mr. Browne was very fond of his
wife, and she of him ; the attachment appeared to
be reciprocal ; Mrs. Browne was a thee, flit, gay, and
lively woman, extremely handsome .end sweet tem.
pored ; she bore four children to her husband, and
was delivered of a filth (a boy) since their separation.

P. Byrne, servant to Mr. Browne, remembers his
mistress gibing him a letter, three weeks alter the 27th
of September last, to emu to Mr. Blake; shy par-
ticul.iily desired him to give it to no person but Mr.
Blake; witness did so, and got 'an answer; Mr.
BI ike likewise told him to take care and give the an-
swer to no one but his mistress.

Ilfary iJindr, servant to Mr. Browne, remembers
Mr. Blake anJ several other persons being at the
bons.: on the 2.7111 of January last ; her tilivress gave
directions to her that night, and bade her have break-
"sr very early, for Blake was en hunt the r.,!xt
morning ; Remember: that morning ; saw her 'pis-
tress in the lobby, in .1 •liort bed-own and her shift,
just opposite to Mr. B 1: kc's hedo.uom, the door of
which was ajar, mid Me. (Lake, in his shut, Loking
out ; Leard s violcia • r robing of her masier's ;
soon after saw Mr. Bro..sne in the parlour ; she writ[
to a writing civic, which was also a dressing-ca,e,
and which wittie.e certain was not in the parlour
the night before; that wi.ting-Jcsk has been remove.!,
and WAS never sitii-e found.

This witness was examined to another trarl.
action. She swore etat in the monta of A.:gum, •
hake and a party 111.nlie men wire. OA a visii at
Mr. Brownt•'s. 'f ;try ail wen,. to 'tint, except Mr.
H • :tai.! :it V. rit.-kti4L!, and wit:.••,s saw him
go up to 1::e be.!-louirr tio•-, and Mr,. Browne
also ro up. When witness saw her all-,ttess
she (die miser,.,,) was greatly flairied. it struck
her (the wita•si) As being suspicious, but .lie did not
coininumeate i, to any person. Same tame alter this
affair, her rm,tiess Came in with wet feat, and desired
the witness t.i pull off her (Mrs. Bioatile's)
and put Cxin to dry at the parlon: the. When they
had been taken till, she (1 ...fs. 0Alle) saw the de-
fendant coming towards the hou,e, ai,.l cried out,
Oti, here i% Mr. Blake !" and ordered the witness
to draw on the steck.ngs again, without waiting to
have them dried. Mis. Browne that went to meet
Mr. Blake, and wiawis saw" her through a glass door
which led hoar a Ito: en 11,:use tri the grand hall, throw
her arms round Mr. 14.ike's neck and kiss hilts. The
reason that she concealed the a circumstances, she
said, was, that she th-light it would be extremely
wrong to go between man and wile.
The cross.examination of this witness consumed two
licurs and a hall. Its object was to spew that she v.as
favourite of :dr. Browne's (with whom she still
lives), and to induce a belief that she had been cri.
miadily intimate with Lim, :inch therefore not &sa-
ving of credit ; bur not the slightest imputation oa
bet- veracity was thus obtained,

The text wiinoss wus //opera llrcaan. She went to
live AC Mr. Browste'!., a, seivaist, in May 181.5, and
left it in nlay, 1811;. Akw rays before her depar-
tote site saw Mr. Eloise come up stints to his rn an
And go into it. S!te sow N'rs. Dionne go int, it
afterwards; witness tben duwn stairs, but re-
turned in about 1.5 or '2O whittles, and saw Mr. 1314 k:
cibrie out of his 10,in ai.d go down stairs. Mrs.
Blowne went to her own r..om, and witness did n.. 3
see her alto-Words that eight. betwe-n
eleven mid twelvi! o'cli.cit at night. Mr,. Browne
was skewed for flue night, except that she helki
petticoats on. It was t t the parlour Mr. 111ake went.
where the Gentle:men were drinicinfi:; witness Taltted
the s..rvice lit a few Jays alter tlii. trunsuetion.
returned back in vie it•llowitig October, for three
weeks. During Cie sccond -toy :he went one dty
into the otowing-roits isifh bird :lords,. which she
had been cleaning. and Mr. and Mrz.
Browne sitting at the lire, ;tin' Alr. Bloke kissing her
inistress.-The lutltr 4a,ke angrily and" intpudehtly"
to witness on this occu

I). Al. hi cvin, E.-7. in ove.cl the rrurringe stttlemvn!s
of Mr. ;old Ai; ". b. 41tV He. The Lily.% tcrttole
.C 5000; ion the uitocis never IteArki th.:: any pArt
it 114 d been

The defence occupied the r.thule of nest day. The
eviket cc adduced went to (rove the the plaino7'.vas
.nuch Addicted to the plea•.ures of the chAce and the
table, and war• el carekss and net;ligent tittsband•
The Jury wonted a verdict for the dLtendAnt.--
Costs—Sixtence.

SCOTLA NO—A ppoi t 01,•tlt r.f•r the. t.i mn C;rett:t
NOK I ll Lora Clr, k ....a.... Ka
Perth, Wednesday, Sep.. 17 ; tV'erle.ll, Sc',
fond y. Sept.
SuuTu—Lore. I lei tuiuld Am!
Ayr, Thuruuy, sip,. il ; ,U.li:r.c,, St)l. 17;
halt/mei, M• apt. 12.
Wei r--14tral Yi•milly mid I.t.rd seiceeth.
Stirlint, Faddy, Sept. I::: lvvcrary, %Vrthirktity, inn, :7;
GIA-gow, 1 utp2day, .J.