Star.
London, England, 1819-10-11 00:00:00

told in the Office, When I
►d used me.

RNIER-I met many Coun-
tto the Office. Mr. Hunt
stings more than five mi-
y. I had to pass through
on the field. I believe the
!ople had arrived. I believe
e who knocked me down. I

it would not do for the Po-
er to go to a surgeon with
• received.

But they send many

lie attached to the Police ;
:ore the Meeting, to see that
apon ; examined it about ten
Ind it was clear of sticks and
ds to the ground to appre-
I could, when there were
, stones, and brickbats.
RMER-I did not see any
nnets upon the ground ; but
its lay in heaps under a wall.
is of garments upon the field.
rose about the situation of a
ent, as the Court had suffer-
rom the excessive heat, and
day, as well as from the noise
was finally settled that a
the Star, should be provided

r stating that he could not
essed his hope that amply
een adduced, on both sides,
Meeting on the 16th. He
ii Inca to bring forward any
t of his clients, and it would
witnesses were very few in
those on the other side. He
rther evidence to that point
this part of the case. Such
:d be necessary, as the case
lained, and as there was quite
lie Court to satisfy the minds
of a Jury. Therefore no one
ction of more testimony, un-
carry on this Inquiry until
ner or the Jury could live so
of such an arduous inves-

ed against the proposition of
, calling to the recollection of
which he had made, to al-
ntroduction of any testimony
necessary to rebut the evi-
&shworth, as well as to con-
:hose who had sworn to the
conduct of the Meeting. It
that the Foreman of the Jury
ared that the Jury were satis-
that the Meeting was peace-
a the Riot Act was not read.
ce had been since adduced to
it was due to justice, and be
claim it from the coroner's
ridence should be received on
anger that might result to the
uting this important inquiry,
imitation in declaring, that be
t if he could not do his duty ;
I prevailed, he was persuaded,
lest Jury which he had the ho-

he declaration of the Jury al-
ed Gentleman, can only refer
the minds of these Gentlemen
nion was made. But now that
before the Jury, let .it be left

mcluded that no farther evi-
ed as to the character of the

strongly against this decision,
Id tender every witness in his
t would be for the Coroner to
ender.

!rved, that the law which he
: Court, with regard to admis-
iccasion, as well as respecting
y, was fully supported by an
o was perfectly well known in
3W wore a silk gown (Mr. Ser.
derstood.) Having communi-
that distinguished Barrister,
that he had the sanction of his
m which he had expressed upon
t opinion was completely borne
nanee and Perchase.
red his unaltered conviction of
ctrine which he had maintained
rely, that every one of the Yeo- '
Peter's-field, as well as every
ietting in the attack upon the
d in murder, if the Jury should
hn Lees met his death in con-
ds which he received at that
)ort this doctrine, he had quoted
ile the Learned Gentleman on
y dealt trn assertions.
discussion upon this question,
plc occasion to advert to a no-
ted up in different parts of Man-
i the following is a copy :
" Manchester, October S.
tinted to us that Mr. Ashworth, a Bar..
Ily against the Crown, upon the hi-
body of John Lees, has repeatedly &-
at be was ' attending on behalf of the
e, the undersigned Inhabitants of that
r connection or concurrence in the em.
Ashworth, and publicly state that we
that his fees shall not be paid from
; levied upon us."
he did not think it necessary to
ions, for he felt that no such ex-
' degree affect his character, es-
ter, where he was so very well
.1 respected, by those who were
)le. He perfectly well under-
this notice, but he disdained his
idea was quite preposterous that
ly to the poor-rates for the pay-
o--that fee which he expected,
s entitled for his professional ex-
oh, there was too much opulence
ancLester to leave undi.,‘,lorged,