Star.
London, England, 1828-04-25 00:00:00

s

•
Queen Anne it bad been found opodient, foe aim*
.reasons, to make Pertain lawn...4e4t,piacted, &c.
veinal were tbast pute sag the lot& enaametos declared
the Non-Contents had ft. A dilielne, forponet, was called for.
sokstraagers were craned to whhdraW.
Cui our return. we understood their LAMM* b divided. and
that the numbers were—
For the
Sesinst it -
Majority

31
- 11

The Earl of EL.DON said that the present question
was likely to exercise a most extraordinary power upon
the Catholic Question, and whatever-course their Lord-•
ships might choose to pursue, he would vote against the
Bill were he obliged to do so singly below the Bar.
The Duke of WELLINGTON said that his Noble
and Learned Friend upon the Woolsack had suggested
that the discussion should be postponed. The Noble
and Learned Lord had objected, and seemed as if be
wished to divide their Lordships twice upon the ques.
lion. He begged to move, therefore, that the farther
consideration of this clause be postponed until tomorrow.
The Earl of FALMOUTH gave notice that he would move sal
a clause in the Bill, that Dissenters bolding corporate offices should
have no vote respecting the disposal of the Church patronage in the
gift of that corporation.
The Lordships then divided upon the Duke of WettiNcrea's
motion—For the motion 49
Against it . 24
Majority • —25
The further consideration of the Report was then adjourned un-
til to-morrow.
&me conversation here took place, in which the Marquis of
L►xsoowa, the Vol' of ELDON, and the LORD Coaecti.tna took
part, when it was agreed that the further examination of witnesses
on the Penryu Disfranehisement Bill should be adjourned until
Tuesday next.
Their Lordships adjourned at a QUARTIR PAST EICHIT.O.CI.OO4

HOUSE OF COMMONS. •
Mr. BERNAL presented a Petition from tl•o Company of
Dredgers of Rochester against the Malden Harbour Bill, com-
plaining that it went to limit the public right of fishing in the
Biackwater River, in waters that had hitherto been free.
• Mr. WESTERN said he had several Petitions against the Bill,
and spok* strongly against it.
Mr. W. DICK said that it was not intended to press the Bill
this Session, but that another measure would be brought lot ward
neat year. •
Mr. LENNA RD supported the Petition.
. Sir E. KNATCHBULL and Sir E.HARVEYopposed theßill.
The Petition was laid on the tatle.

Nr. NORTH presented a Petition from certain Shareholders of,
the Hibernian Joint Stock Company splint the Bill for dissolving
the same.-l Aid on the table.
Mr. Alderman THOMPSON presented a Petition from James
Humphrey, Esq. in favour of the Whitechapel Rail Road
WiL—
Laid on the table. _ _ _ • _ .

Ur. Alderman WAITH MA N presented a Petition from certain
occupiers of land in favour of the same Bill.—Laid on the table.
Mr.'C. PALLIER presented a Petition from certain owners
of wharfs in the Port of London against the London Dock Dill—
Referred to the Committee.
Mr. WESTERN presented two Petitions -against the Maldon
Harbour Bill.
_ _

Mr. LENNARD presented a Petition to the same effect.—
Ordered to he on the table.

Mr. CARTWRIGHT presentedthe Report .of the Committee
appointed to try the right of voting in the Borough of Ludlow. •
Lord ENNISMOUE moved the Order of the Dan .for re-
suming the adjourned debate upon the Hibernian. Joint= Stock
Company Bill.
The question having been resumed. • •
Mr. SPRING RICE opposed the Bid.
. Mr. P. THOMPSON moveetthat the all beleferredlois Select
Committee.
Mr. Alderman THOMPSON seconded the motion.

After a few observations from Sir J. NTWEORT. Sir G. Hx.s, Mr.
M. FITZGERALD. Mr. J. Gssrrast, %ir. Akiermsn Warruatswi and
Lord Eransisoss, the debate was further adjourned to that day
se'nnight.
Mr. W. DUNDAS presented a Petition from the Royal Burghs
of Scotland, in favour of protectian to the growers of corn.--Laid
on the table

Mr. LAW LEY presented a Petition from the Chamber of Cone- I
merce•of Birmingham, praying a repeal of the • Stamp Duty on
Receipts.—Laid on the table.
Mr. W. DUN DAS presented a Petition from the Royal College
of Phy.iciaus, praying an alteration of the law affecting the obtain-
ing of subjects for anatomy.--Referned to the Cummins*.
Mr. Alderman WOOD presented-similar l'etitiona from the
Medics) Society of London and the Alder.gate-street School of
Anatomy.--lieferred to the Committee. •
Mr. AidermanWOOD presented Petitions from various Friendly
Societies in Faversham against the Friendly Societies'
(erred to the Conimktee.

Similar Petitions were presented by Mr. DAVENPORT, front
Stockton; from Bolton and Ipswich, by Mr. blacasittion; by Mr.
CLIME., from Southampton and Portsmouth; from Birmingham,
by Mr. Laws.av ; by Colonel Dams, from the Vreelsons of M.
bion Sudety; from London, by Mr. Alderman Tmossrwot; front
Cambridge, by Sir J. Toast; from Coventry, by Mr. Fri.'s.—
The Petitions were referred to the Committee on the Bill._

.)r. Alderman WOOD presented a Petition from two Paris Was
in Lancashire, praying the House to az a minimum of wages.—
Laid no the table.

Mr. LEYCESTER presented a Petition front Shaftesbury
miaow the Prien.ily Societies' Bill.
Mr. HERRIBS presented a similar Petition from a Society to
Harwich.

Mr. HUME presented a Petition against the Friendly Societies'
MU from the member* of a Friendly Society in Stockport.
A Message from the Lords announced that their Lordships bad
agreed to some private Bills, and requesting the attendance of C.
Mamas, Esq. and W. Mainline, Esq. to attend their Lordships
land give evidence respecting the Pcnryn Election.—Leave given
, in the usual form.

Mr. PENDARVRS presented a Petition from certain Roman
CadioHes in the County of Cornwall in favour of Catholic Eman.
cipatioo.—Ordered to be printed.
Mr. WILLIAMS presented a Petition from the Corporation
and Inhabitants of Dorchester. praying that no further concessions
, be made to the Roman Catholics.

Mr. CA LCIIA FT said that be understood that the Petition had
ant been agreed to without some discussion, although there was a
large majority in its favour.
Mr. W I LLIA MS said that only one person spoke, and only
three hands were held up against it.—Ordered to be printed.
Mr. R. KING presented Petitions from the Roman Catholics
of various places in the County of Cork, in favour tit the Catholic
Claims.—Ordered to be printed.
kir. T. WILSON presented a Petition from Woodhouse, to sbi
County of York, against further concession to the Roman Catho-
lies.—Ordered to be printed.
Mr. CARTER presented four Pe•ition• from Portsmouth and
Southampton, against the Friendly Societies Bill. The same Hon.
Gentleman presented a Petition front the Catholics of Portsmouth,'
for Emancipation.
Mr. J. WOOD presented similar Petitions front 'Manchester,
Bolton-le-Moors, and another place.
Mr. J. WOOD presented a similar Petition from a Unitarian
Congregation at Warrington.
Mr. LAW LEY presented a Petitions from the Chamber of
Commerce, for a repeal of the Stamp Receipt Duty.
Sir J. GRAHAM presented similar Petitions from Wbitebaven
and Workington.
Lord KASTNOR presented a Petition from the Catholics of
Hereford for Emancipation.
Mr. S. RICE presented a Petition from the Brown Linen Ma.
nutactorers of Charieville, Ireland, praying for protection for their
manufacture.

Ordered to be printed.
Mr. C. BARCLAY brought in a Bill to regulate Elections for
the County of Galway.—Read a first time, and ordered to be read
a second time on May sth.
Colonel DAVIES prt minted the Report of the Select Committee
oo the Boroughs and Cities Polls Bill—Ordered to be recommitted
on Monday neat.
BYNG brought in a Bill to Relieve Counties from Repair.
ing !toads within certain limits of Bridges.—Read a first time.
Mr. W. PEEL presented Returns of the number of persons
h..ving Forfeited their Recognisances in Criminal Prosecutions,
within a given times.—Crilerod to be printed.
Mr. MOORE patpoood until to-morrow his presentation of
'the City of Dublin Petition &phut the Catholic Association.
Mr. BATLEY promoted a Petition from due Mayor and Cor-
poratiooof Beverlb in Yorkshire. against the Catholic Claims.
Lard I. "MOM" SPeatid similar Petitions from the
Rural. Deans and Clergy of Stow and the Forest, in the Diocese
of Gloucester.

Me. HUME premmed a Petitioo for Catholic Hasioetration
fret. tin Roman Catholkei.ot. Rromovel lathe Ceemesof Down.
Air. Al. A. TA Xl.Olt promattal a: iteekloo•for, irmaskaltatiao
fteihe Romeo Catbollmod.Celsikdo..k COolity oialaeltaat.
; HEATH COXII presented a tatiftg Nth Alit leadhoiden
014 Pardeshbv, to Wow oPtio ;Ora. tevii.
Mr. HUME moved for a Rot= of the gam*, and 011idal

Value of all Mee Imported into the United g,lngdom for the ten
roan coding the 6th of Januly,ll2B..-Ordari.
• LIFR 4.IORUITILS.
Mr. Alderman WAITHMAN presented a. PetitiOn
,from Mr. Moses Wing. complaining that he had given
-repeated information to Government on the subj •ci of
`Life Annuities. The Hon. Alderman adverted to the
r statements of Mr. Pinlaison on the subject, and obseried;
that it was extraordinary- nothing had been done. So
early as May, 1819, the Petitioner had addressed-a-kV:
ter to Government, stating the lossei which the country
sustained by the then mode of granting Annuities, and
the necessity for a new set of tables. Now Mr:Finlaisonl
had a salary of 5001. a year to enable him to construct
new tables, but up to January last he bad not fulfilled
his duty in that respect. The Petitioner had cakulated
that upon the transfer of 12,000,0001. under the present
tables, there would be a loss of 2,690,0001..6 the public.
It appeared from the statements made fornielly.' that
the public were losing 8,0001. weekly by the present
tables, and yet the late Chancellor of the Exchequer
neglected to remedy the evil, though he admitted, in his
answer to the Petitioner, that the fact was so. The.
Northampton cedes were made by the Equitable As-
surance, which Office
.made immense profits from the
calculations taken under these tables. So. far from new
tables being necessary, calculations might be made with-
out recourse to any new measure. He contended, that the
House, in justice to the public, was bound to institute
an inqoiry into the subject. . .
The Petition was ordered to be printed.
CnORT OF CHANCERY.
.Mr..M. A.TAYLOR. rose, in pursuance of his notice,
to bring forsiard his Motion, which, had he not heard
to the contrary from a high quarter in the Hoitsi; he
should have thoight would have been sanctioned by
his Majesty's Government, and had that been the case,
he should have had no occasion to .go at any length
into the subject. He could not conceive what could
induce his Majesty's Governnient to persist in their
refusal to look into the Mate of the Court of Chan-
cery, which 'had been the lubject of appeal to that
House for Year's, and which, before he sat down, he
would prove to be at present 'in a worse state than it
ever had been.- He supposed that it was because mo-
tions on this subject proceeded from an humble and
insulated individual that they were not noticed; but he
had such reliance on the good sense of the Unuse and
the country, thee they would' see that this Court was,
not sufficient for the business of the country, and. that
one day or other they would demand of the Govern-
ment to take some steps =to ameliorate its conditiOn.—
The subject had. before been thought deserving of in,
quiry. hi 1811, a motion had been • carried' by the
casting vote of the Speaker, for aninquiry into the state
of the suitors, and, u ith the concurrence of the Lords,
it was avecd that steps for that purpose should.be taken.
He would* assert that the state of the Court was not then
one-third so bad aa..it was at present. The truth was,
the evil was of such us ignitude that Mieisters did not
like to look it in the face ; and thit*.wilg,tio 1.4 mbit f
saying, "We Ititow .it . is„ very btkt ,that eon, be
dotter In many. caws, alit; .I)l4,Xelci.'s
go forward without shneriaiot soriteieme4 ?". • And
When he had offered to *Kew it, then he wits.told,
" We are not agreed as to the eataat tg,1,10,
/le could;.howev_er„. never reloa.,lo..iskt Efforts. upon
I the subject. rbe.were told to produce a plan, he
Would do so; but, at ill events, he would at different
times take the sense, of the House. He had no in-
dividual interestin what he did.. He. never .writhed
under the infliction; of the Court of Chaneemand ra-
ther than suffer the misery of, its aid
.he 'would with
pleasure forfeit several hundred pouncli. Would MinfsT
ten themselves think it'pleasant to go.there,? No, they
would not;.but still, the public was to be sacrificed to the
political state of the country; lie did not Mean to quarrel
with the Report hefore the House:. He Would'ouly ob-
serve, that two years had elapsed, that the Bills brought
forward had been abandoned, and that all the pu'llic had
to look to was I string of resolutions, or orders, published
by the Lord Chancellor, and which were intended merely
to expedite causes to, the period of hearing. He had
not, however, anything to do with the subject until the
time of heating, and up to that period he did not
quarrel with those orders. Although he had been at the
t?,.r, and had practised. in Chancery, he would not then
enter into the practices which might clog suitors,-but
he wouhl call the attention of the House, one ototheri
to these orders, as well as to the. system generally, which
were far from what it ought
.to be, as it was not the
subject he meant to discus.. He would however say,
that from the strides made by the Court of Chancery, if
it proceeded in its present course, there was no knowing
'to what length its inflictions might extend ; and he ap-
pealed to the Country Gentlemen what would, in pro-
cess of time, be the result, and whither there was any
subject, however private or indifferent, which, according
to the powers now claimed. might not be brought before
it. Indeed he might go as far in that way as Hudibrasi
who looked upon it as an engine even in law and match-
Making, for he suggested,when speaking of the lawyers:
" And if you foUow their advice?
In bills and answers, and replies,
. • You'll write love-letters in Chancery
Shall make your fair, on oath, answer ye,
And either force her to be your wife, •
Or make her wretched all her life." •
And indeed (said the Honoprable Gentleman) .that is
true;.for if 1 was a young Lady—(A laugh)—and a.
loan said if you don't marry me I'll put you into Chan-
cery, as will be recollected was done, the other day with,
a dead man, against whom a bill was filed, I would
agree at once to his proposal, sooner'than be obliged .to
go in there and answer upon oath as to whether 1 liked
him, and to the various -other piquant interrogatories
Which a humorous or a malicious genius might suggest.
As to the orders, they did not appear to be consistent
with what they ought; a,, when a bill was ripe for
bearing, the party was obliged to apply for Love to se.
it down, and considerable time would elapse before
even the very hearing came on. The delays wh ch
took place. in the Court of Chancery were so great,
that if a party sued for a legacy of 2001. bequeathed
to him, and that the executors to the will did not admit
assets, he 'would defy the most ingenious, active, and
able solicitor in London to get that two hundred
pounds out of Chancery under a_ period of six years.
Also, if a widow and children were to receive a residuary
bequest, after the payment of debts, &c. provided there
were assets, could it be supposed, although it cert.tibly
was the case, that during- the whole of the, proceedings,
unless the Master made a separate report, that this
widow and children would be actually left without any
means:of support? The motion he intended to proposehe
should shortly state, because he would be sorry to lead
the House astray, or under any circumstances to bring
forward a motion which he could not substantiate. The
terms of his motion would be, ss that it appeared to the
House, from the papers laid before it, and the evidence
taken by the Commissioners, that-notwithstanding the
establishment of the office of Vice Chancellor in
11313, some further steps were necessary for the advan-'
personP presidingg tin the decided,
t ofc and
hanle froyr,
'en a 14"thir Pfe l cas
°C
ou r
effectually to discharge his other important 'duties."
When the question was last before the House, his Right

Bon. Friend the Home Secretary did him the how,*
to say, that he was glad he (Mr. M. A. Taylor) did not
Maas to move for any further Committee, and %vas eat,
tent with the papers before tie House, and with
evidence before the Commissioners. When he mov
• bi

for papers a few weeks ago, he stared the number
causes then set. d9wna.as fa.t..;3l.llVEZlatdran
he found it correct. He beggtchb assure his c10n.?0,4
the Solicitor. General, that he would conic to the iipsitio
simply,. tend he hoped that he shOuld justify himself
the opinion of the House by the course he would punk
lipase papers on' the table, it appeared that on the'
day .:of Hilary Term, 1818, these stood before
Chancellor, re-hearings and appeals 69. Before
Vice-Chancellor, causes 851. Pleas and demutiers
Exceptions and• farther directions 158—making in
595. Ir.,was important to mask a distinction hem,.
when st-cavate was•mentioned or heard, it should,-
derstood.as being simply in a state of prowess, '
it had afterwards to be sent to the Master tor htreeptliti
after which came exceptions, and then Orobablyanothei
bearing for further directions. Sometimes there el
two applications for further directions, and what he cni
plained of was tonlirmed by causes refilaihing tot heat!
during two years, and aft- rsrards set down for. Nu!
directions for full a yearend a, half. The Hon. Mew
_

then went on to notice, in terms of the highest praise, k,
exertions made by the plc sent Master of the Bolls while
in the office of Vice• Chancellor. He then did all 01.4;i
man, could .40. to. expedite the business of the Con.
By the utmost possible exertion he was enabled to Ow
the business of his
:branch of the Court upon such,
looting as thot causes generally received fur.her dirk,
Lion in six or seven months. after they came upon •
paper, but before a short time had elapsed from
period of his appointnient, business so increased tha
he found it impossible to put them in a train for futtlni
directions in less than 18 or 19 month. from the tie,
they appeared on the paper. The House would
course bear in mind, that when these directions wen
givei, there was still not an end to the suit--thsn'
directions were far from finally disposing of
the first day' of last term there vete altogether itul,
than 559'eauses in the Cotirt of Chancery not dispotel
of, (hat is, befote the Lord Chancellor and tt.e V
Chancellor. There were at the same betthe

Master of the Rolls, eighty:one cases upon exceptions,
and 147 musts,' which, with those set down for 4utt/
directions, made 266, giving a total of 825 in the Cow
of Chanoety. He spoke from facts well authenticatt
It would be wen from the paper delivered in tn-Coui
within the last tot might, that before the Lord Chancel
',there were twenty juJgments—there had been silty, I
lof that number forty had been gotten rid of, twenty
(course remainiap. On the first day of Term, in t
Vice Chancellor a Court,•there stood for judgment,
on pleas and demurrers. 75; causes, 341 ; except'
and further directions, 106. -His statements we:K.l
land it was worthy of remark, -that-some-of -th*cat
.which had been heardleforelLord Lyndhurst, when
was Master of the Rolls, weenot yet-deciddd—{Heal
!In 1611,1812, and 1813, tylatn. the.Hou e had thouy
:it right to interfeteolte state of" the Court was ti
Before the Lord Chancellor--.••CaillitS, 1191 appeals,

and demurrers, 59; making a total of 213'; s;iiletel
the Rolls there were—causes, 226; further directions,
When .the House thought it 'necessary to establish.a
Chancellor's Court,. the arrears were 483, v.hereas
present the arrears were .885. He therefore mair.taint
by the act of the House on a preceding occarion,
ought again to take some step for the relief "of
suitors. The Hon. Gentlernalt then quoted largely hoe
the. Report of • the Commissioners, and contended
that Report. confirmed 'him in.his .view, that anodic!
.Tudgq was necessary-for the due dispatch of the buhiCICSI
They all admitted the evils, but feared to look the
medy in the face. Burk. tad said,- that

allowed that such and oich.shiess were perfectly
and very desirable, hat tht7.etete• imptacticable;
to those persons Mr. Burke replied. •,-That. whkl,
not practicable is not.desir able ;;uothing t 1 at is.tor vet
good but is within the reach of indurdry and ssell.4
reeled, perseverance. ;Nothing that GOD has mark
which is desirable for-es• but is te, be-attained. • But •i
men cried to the mom. they must still cry on."—
(Hear.)—That -had. been
.the refit of that illestrisa
man; the House had set its shoulders to the wheel, toll
his measures for reforming the household and. otte
matters were carried. . He was *sorry the Right
Secretary for.the Horne Department si,oold be alma
when such a stibjest. was—under discuoion—Hear,
(frfr.i'sit. entered the House at this moment).—Hero
'glad to see his Right Hon. Friend in his pLce, but bt
should have been much better pleased if he had read tin
ettracts from the evidence before the Corami4iuneti
Mr. PEEL intimated that he had read the evidence.

Mr. M. A. TAYLOR. said that he was very glad to
hear that such was the case; WV* the Right Hinder.
able Gentleman had indeed read the evidence,. how hr
could hope to get over the circumstances of the case he
did not know,as he went simply on its facts. As to the
question of bankruptcy, that was' only one* ova'
dart' consideration. He did not intend to insist that
that must be taken away; but he did insist most sue.
nuously that something must be done. What brit .tht
project that Government had for affording relief.?:
send a portion of the cases to she Exchequer. But ;cis
this either fair or just ? What right had Government to
dictate valsereAghshmen were to go for justice? It
was a thing not to be toietated, for he affirmed that eve'?
man had a tight to'ay that his cue should go before the
'Great Seal. But irwas, said, ityou find an evil, you are
bound to find a remedy: He denied this; but even when
he offered a remedy,' he should ha‘e his facts denied,
and the consequent necessity of a remedy at all. Some
time ago, he had been t01d,." if the state of the Court be
not difilrentin'oneyear, we Will support you"—(Hear.)
Now, was there any atm, ition in the state of the Cowl?
—(Heat). He knew of none--not that he intended io
find any fault with the Judge: the fault thathe found
was with the Government that suffered such things to
exist without amendment, and seeing the harassed state
in übich the suitors of the Court sere, did not say—
" this shall no longer be." The House might negative
his motion by what majority it pleased; bur he pledged
himself to bring it forward again and again,
till some-
thing like justice was procuted. He for one would never
consent to sending the suits in Chancery to be ttiedes
the Court• of Exchequer; on the contrary, he felt with
.many of the Gentlemen who had given evidence co
the Committee, that the simplest mode to relieve the
Court of Chancery would be to separate the baokeruptcy
business from it. Supposing such a septration woe to
take place, and Lord Eldon were appointed Judge is
'bankruptcy cases,' would the public deplore such as
event? 'Certainly not. There might perhaps beta little
delay, but at least there would be no deficiency in pleat
or business-like questions. Where then did the diSculty
lie? Not in the business—this might. be one ; buts
the patronage that belonged to it—(Hear!) Vthat
would become of the office of the patentee of bank-
ruptcies, where pia :thousand pounds a year. wets p 44
tot' doing: 4144.4 swihiag,l!7.-19r, ac ofiiSrrs ine!
, rally never went near the place, nor saw Chancery
from one year's end to the other.—(Hear, heat!)—

And Os". 'As tbh
;r!: i'ret#*?. !Ph°.
diOtit• peifiai
• their
'be
1,

iei
CI

an
an
nc

lies
ig.t

ion
inacel

,ascu
'ideal,
tem,
el
iucl

Ft
bee

Jugh
hante

111-4-4
Pito
I MUM
ision
he
if i
was
halo
ship
takii
wit
ha
al

. %In
iod,.
he h
cav
the'

:ain

tiffic
Betel
oI
both

for
,mba
bet
!am

in,
•CCObf

nnei
from,
evil
multi
' the
"ant

ted
WA

1 A
'VI

, theciti
1144,-.deCiJeci. bets,
daisy lus-had-nsentitou
then,
w4sihilstelay4hAt . co!
of a cause, and its ci
Thoso.swho ssoulst asg
titular Judges. or a
intdtitiOd, thud be
aiijl..pa4. history of
•Uthe isadequiscy of
through-their busing
$0 fat back pis. the
tinned it as the great
succeeded in keepini

sestbili

seece
bvef
a/

-7 riri,
atteensul
tag

to
depending upon the
it was evident that
for the labour they h
'fudges—theqi it
the TiteVhaucellot,
eiberpsee. bids -fast;
to the equity part Or
!Poe au average slat
uvas passed a life of
bet be - nted that
haw 'veil if
-as
ut
lent:
the
['rim
Vll

tOkr

Mese
IMF

'Pith lc ;:tifft" peioOd On • than
mores 4.ord-Clianrellet bi
nber 1 rand. the oCcuoier -I
4:o:•tap /Aide? in that eau
21.,„..714,44 ictitiou S mockes ie
‘7---Nt -.pealing:from the C
mlelff tenor in a full • b
punk side df hiew,•,at
the he
4 o . To m 41re an
.both wishing him a
fore of n
fore de ,4 the poblie would n
''Srs It .• • mote expense, as
K iiw-all :1-•.• decisions. to causes
lereff - ~ , . In making.
ihe t 0..., ; , woself vaned upoi
because - bist intruded hinssi
vlePait, again begged to,ass
another : upon any individua
ire weld attacked the system
he emu. be hoped shalt his e
heating gree to produce Sue
farther to reform.
Member Lord RANCLIF
.4iseitbv that he had long be
lit while the delays in the 4
an chit suitors; and thougl
e Cou; present Lord Chalk
to plea ceive that the fouls
' such[ trusted that such
.1
et dugs,•sectify some or dm
lll'm lle : Court a serious evil
rout the .to have buseuess:to I
sed tb4 licioitwaitair 1
r furthie Mr. 'IVES& 'tope
the tic the delays in Charm
could d : delay. in the decision
ins well ; iliersee down for hi
f_fbee 5. be advisable, evep. if
it.—Qt the very day it was
r .no.lee . directed by a Stay
disposed • ,Veason why they shr
'.e V.Ces '1 ilfri4 a 4'16 ;' or tak
the the upcurvass average wi
reptions, . ..ossever, a cause hi
r 4tother it could be heard, a
he Court . ear, hearts. He 1
nticated.' . Ono. o yiars in it
'Counsel i.. .f the case, :but it .‘I
ishceller ' im forlhat period,
illy, bus ,I ion of business he 1
venty .• 1 : nt fairly-, the cap
I,' -in the i 7
..Uld go btfore tht
mint, 2 1 ireetions ;go agaii
rception, • the Master's OE
nffacts • - the p,aper: Bets
riicaute .. •1f..4.5f..e 410 - 14 of
alien h rsias sUpposing both
-{Hear flysnia.4tea to-issue; - for
lhough be much more emb
ivas this ••)wevrover, would be
eats, 35 . - ',were wasted in star
ilebefer ,: avP, ()t the parejeee
tionc, .' I,oo:st:sliii from an
iskaVt.. .: penal, em accou
leteas , ' the POWirbbsini
4.rai .1 .`? , ,i- akpaaled from
;Afro% ~ ' 'kit') up. This ewi
of 'of thr ta. of . self-multi
;ely frog •' moils he had nii
tied Thai :..it.iiiit•• abated,' an
anodic! Or .1-i.e himself 1
bukfues • owner Coessp.n]
t them of .•age wanted
it people isiti:,:Trispatcb w
:slysiglit„:ooo49,lhceiif these
i ble; ard : ache' aanuity .
which, if . 44011111111011. lairwf-i
15.101 of itb lit' tried, fhValia

gtetaitiu a
ed that
l of
st:here
yl
ig
ing to the successful 1
through the artisan
expressed hit alert,
IttiShfri s
Till Agri
o Iltirtitteitdt hit 4
0.00-11 the atl
• boats, who SCIOCI
,twer hearts bit
qt tot of nine al
anien the an
they attiefebn
I. *lto tai
re tvefy tante' t
Melt it was set a
4 $ found impracti
Guildflud) Lord Sc
ktreti
Been able to* sticcee4
1t -was idle, then, to

INN behealth . But expecteevend the
to the utmost, it. ws
*nuts completely
acknowledged talc
One reason of 1
we deterred by ti
fusceeding fre
.er foetid there
tratwdinarily to
ght before him
belated him.
had mentioned,
t of hW dUties.
1161; %Pt Ole Mil
by the
bled& ems
vilittert *Melt ittfl