Star.
London, England, 1819-04-03 00:00:00

r-

. tha:, they 4.ti-baaa. taut. away ;
4,
.is:
~ •• • ; but nide-not-the Oentle-
, Gar 2:;••
• „ e.reral Gourgaud had friends in this
• '
caald have taken Care .4, thiof
• - It
;1:e duty cf that House- .copsljej
against a man, a suecient reason for
:ase into inquiry.--(Hear, heir.) The
Honourable Gentleman opposite
linty weighed more with him than
General Gourgaud, but for that very I
•an inquiry. He did not accuse the
:atleman of any breach of the law,
voluntary injustice towards this
might be seen in this case one of the
og from :he possession of uncontrolled
eerscns potsessed of arbitrary power there
and inherent proneness to violence

'URST thouzht that neither the Ho-
General, nor the Honourable Gentleman
side oldie House had said any thing
rounded on the statements of the Pett-
had not answered any of the asser-
been made on the other side. Did
no attention should be paid to these,
should go one way ? The Honourable
said, that General Gourgaud asked to
before a Justice of the Peace, meaning
ail ; but the gallant General had said,
that he should appeal to the Privy
: arguments were completely at va-
accounted for the Generals conduct
erounds. The latter au-gurnent seemed to
0
de up before the former one was produced.
,T sail. that the Noble Lord and the
(able Gentleman had urged, ahat no
iperadded to that of General Gm-
the evidence of those who were ae-
oaals. if that were so, he was at least,
believe the testimony of the oppressed,
- of those who stood charged as cri-
ts 11.elourable friend had stated, that
Idea, :.e evidence of two servants, two
es, t . servants of General Gourgaud,
y, one to a part, and another te the
transaction; and be did believe the
a upon this evidence to be co: eect.—
. said of the language used by the
\hat! were persons to be gagged too
make no complaint? But to the main
-ever had been made or attempted.—
his letters or not ? Did they break
.o-olio—a;:..:;red portfolio? Did they
break it open ? Let them give a specific
' luestion. He did not say that they
eeer, no ; but let them do it.
;LAIR rose under the Gallery on the Op.
, aad said he was anxious to express his
to what had been advanced on that side
against the Aheia.Bill. That BM was
it was beneficial—it enabled Ministers
this country those who had long been
ruin abroad, and who had..come to this
rder to condaue their mischievous prac-
persons manifested their venom, now
ld not sting.
'CTCHINSON considered the transact-,
. disgraceful and barbarous. An Ho-
tembethad objected to the credibility of
'tat Englishmen were guilty of such bru-
te must remind that Honourable Mem-
;amen had been guilty of passing the
If 2 Committee should be agreed to, he 1
nented. But it was not the intention of
,rd to appoint a Committee ; and if the
Member for Durham should move fur
aiship would frustrate the attempt. The
importance, of vital importance to the
the country. Each of the Members on
side had made a different case. - The first
- Gentleman had made as. lame a state-
had ever been made in Parliament. The
targe was in fact admitted by him. He had
to speak again : he hoped that leave would
, and a Committee appointed to investi-
hole transaction. The remarks of the No-
as to the veracity of the General, were ex-
'; but they had the testimony of his gallant
Member for Southwark, who had ean-
1e of the servants ; the very length too of the
General's statement corroborated its truth.
'llerefcee consider the Noble Lord's obser-
_to veracity quite indecorous. But it was
character of the nation that was before the lionse.
- the duty of Ministers. if they must have:
such a proceeding, to employ officers who
pe:Mrm their is art with every respect andl
? He should like to knew what officers went
ter, that it might be ,ccrtained what chat-
, had. Englishmen 'dere indeed changed.,
vo,, when it was their boast that a lot eignia
• put his foot upon English ground than he
Ind entitled to ail the benefit of English laws
heyeti them. Now we were disgraced by
of persecution and cruelty. Admiring, as
le glory of Waterloo, he considered our con-
e as impolitic and disgraceful to the country ;
:enduct which thnse who silo- .1 come after
4 reprobate. He did, therefore, wish that
Ale Lord would give the General an oppor-
proving, and the Government of disprov-
charge. It was a statement of as great a
.e as had ever been presented to Parliament.
a,ce was as lame as ever had been offered.
.d that the Honourable Member for Durhain
ke some ulterior steps, not so much for the
az gallant .ireneral, as the credit of the country.
ii;OIIGE 2.OOKBUBN, as some Honour-
en lers heei spoken of General Gourgetud as
,
tte.t uined by his fidelity to his •fonner man,
;ged Lo offer a few words on that subjset. lie
't day, at St. Helena, said, when speaking of
41 Bei ttrand—" It was all through that Komi-
thus :ic spoke of the General) that I cant*
It •:as natural for him (Sir G. Coelburn) to
• that he supposed he came to. St. Helena with
r.t tte because he wished to be of the number of
itrvers. Ile said, " No, that was not the case;'
itttet observed, that he had coved under Bona.
:L,orssi.t, where he attractcd•his notice, and was
I.lol'. r, eat-Colonel. fie afterwards served ,
A"limp which cost Bonaparte die loss of
' ; and while Napoleon was at Elba,. he (Get.
• ppeared
te.a • •
• in France. lie wan of course
,* :."d',:'. his oath, and eervectin thy 'loyal army.,
•%sztri took.greatnotiee of hint, gave hilts

4.
* '

the ercii:r and in various Orays distinguished I
hie. When 13OttapartettetomesttOtts ERN ettutkaud
hasteeedtonicet hint attd applied for employment. He
was appointed to a command, And the next day waited
on General Bertrand to thank him for his 17ood otlices.l
the General last mentioned gave him rather a
cool reception, and told him no thanks were due to
him, for had his niaster beea'rUled by his advice, he
would have had nothing to do with such Giroudtrs
as General Gvurgaud. But for that foolish speech,
he said he should not then have been at St. Helena,
for he should have turned again, and he was confi-
dent that he should have been very well received.
It was, therefore, not his fidelity that had carried
him to St. Helena ; if it had been, nu one would
have known better how to respect it than himself.—
He understood a report had gone abroad that Gene-
ral Gourgaud had been sent out of the country at
the instance of a person connected with the Navy.—
This was untrue.

Mr. LAMBTON replied.—The question still re•
mained unanswered. Under what pretence were
General Gourgaud's papers seized ? On the other
side there was no evidence but Benjamin Capper's,
If the character of the General was bad, how came
he to be received into the company of some of his
Majesty's Ministers ?—(Hcar,bear).—He understood
that he had dined (he might mention the name) with
Lord Bathurst—(Mr. Goulburn nodded asscnt),—and
he believed with Lord Castlereagh—(No).— now
begged the attention of the House to a circumstance
respecting Capper which was to be found in the Po-
lice Report of 1816; it was a very extraordinary cir-
cumstance. Capper, in uniform, and with a drawn
sword, accompanied by a foreigner and Bow-street
Officers, entered a gambling-house, and carried away•
a large sum of money from the table, which was never
returned by him. Such was the man whose evidence
was relied upon on the other side. Ile should be glad
to learn that the Noble Lard would appoint a Com-
mittee of Inquiry. He would willingly leave the no-
mination of it to his Lotdship The Noble Lord
had said that the General had ill.used the Officers.—
How could one man, unarmed, eve ill usage to the
number of officers employed? At Ilford, or. the load
to Harwich, the ill-used General endeavoured to ob-
tain
redress from a Magistrate ; he was struck on the
head till he bled, and in that state he was conveyed tol
Harwich. He now moved, that the Petition be laid,
on the table : he should subsequently move that it be
printed, in order that all the Members might be fully
aware of its contents. He had no hopes of a Corn.
mittee. As to the Alien Act, he had formerly ex-
pressed his opinion of its principles and provisions.
The lion. Gentleman under the gallery (Mr. Sin-
,lair) appeared to have embellished his speech, by
culling the general terms used in defence of that Act,
and to have added the barbarities committed against
General Gourgaud as fit illustrations : but if the Act
hid been wise and just, it altered not the present case,
for under the Act there could be no right to commit
so nefarious an outrage. He fully agreed with his
Honourable Friend, the Member (or Shrewsbury,
that the papers had been feloniously taken,
Mr. BECKETT begged to stale, that several com-
plaints had been made against a very irregular house
to Pall-mall. The whole conduct of the business had
been committed to Mr. Graham, and by him had

---
Capper been employed.
Mr. BENNET said, that Mr. Graham might have
employed Capper, but what had Capper to do with
a foreigner? Why was he in uniform ? Why with '
a drawn sword ? According to the opinion of Mr.
Nares, the Magistrate, when asked whether Capper
was to be trusted? it appeared that Capper was not
to be trusted. Upon this statement (tlie Hon. Member
held the Police Report open in his hend) he would not
trust Capper in any transaction. The Hon. Member
read from the Police Report Mr. Nares's answers to
his questions—" Would you commit Capper if he
were brought before you upon this charge?"--" I'
am not certain that there is evidence sufficient for
that !—(Much chcering front the Ministerial side ; on
which the Hon.Mensber entreated them to suspend their
cheers till they should hear the whole)—but I should
have run the risk most undoubtedly !"—(Vehement
cheerirg from the Opposition side of the Muse.)
On the motion that it be printed,
Mr. C. HUTCHINSON put it to the Noble Lord
(Castlereagh), whether he would think it proper to
have the petition printed, and thereby sent generally
1 before the public—whether he would consent to have'
it go abroad, that this officer had been treated with
such gross indignity as the petition described, without
afterwards consenting to go into an inquiry respect-
ing it ?—( Hear.)
Lord CASTLEREAGH replied, that when the
time should arrive at which the propriety of an in-
quiry mi jilt be discussed, he would then state his opi-
nions u:- in the subject. He was unwilling to say any
thing ...-hich could wound the feelings of General
Got , ;and ; but if the matter should come for discus-
sion. he should feel it his duty to state his opinions.
Tate question was then put, and the petition ordered
1 to be printed; after which
Mr. BENNET, having been informed by an Ho-
nourable Friend that the observations which he had
made upon the conduct of Mr. Capper were mistaken,
he begged distinctly to be understood, as having
meant them to apply not to Mr. Henry Capper, who
had the superintendence of the Convict Department.,
but to Benjamin Capper. It was impossible that he
could have thoughts for an instant of using a harsh
expression of Mr. Henry Capper, than whom he be-
lieved there did not exist a more humane or honour-
able individual in the country. His observations
were directed to Benjamin Capper, the person who
removed General Gourgaud, and to him only.
Clitil4RY svfnlititS.
Mt. BENN'ETT brought in a MI for the better Regulation
of Chimney Sweepere Apprentices. which was and a fast, ead
ordered to be reed a second *se on Monday. i
• BA.eitftErrt x.Aws.
Mr. J. SMITH moved the second reading of the
Bankrupt Laws Amendment Bill. This subject had
attracted general attention; and he had received many
communications on the subject, and he had accord-
ingly altered some of its provisions. One veal the in-
sufficient means of securing bankrupt's property, itnd
another Lot preventing unfair debtors from the pre.:
sent Malls of procuring their certificates. He pro-
posed also,.ta alter the punishment of death for Wank-
rupts concealing their property. It was also desir-
d
able to, extend the provisions of this Act to Irelan.
The etaiDiftstion of the Camimissionesii before the
Committee *add crestior lit- Off,' tithes rhhfd it
respect for the present state of the bankrupt Laws.

.41.141110

~•a~

The 614 and ode eitliteillitisticiOttant enures. was
that on'thit, permits liakaktssabil bankrupt lar.w.s. On
thishad hi:du much
mad litigett**B.4a
ders: a gentleman vihis
lin
formerly existed: Persons
ijounwho has,adan7soirelrdbtheeensktriaa:
of the dead base:hit fed • - with, was made for that
a bankrupt. A dyer Was made a bankrupt because he
bought colouring dr*gs, and sold them again in the
articles coloured. He was not sure he had succeeded)
in the framing of this clause. The new Acts of Ban!:
ruptcy was, a person who for seven days stopped i. :y.-
ment, or who had been for certain successive days
absent, from business: This he wished to be tho-
roughly investigated. Out .of 100 Commissions of.
Bankrupt, 99 were concerted ones. This might be
done perfectly free froan fraud. This however, gave
a bankrupt power to turn round and sav, I ant no
bankrupt, my commission was concerted. This being
proved, he could call on his assignees to repay his
property, which they may have fairly divided. There
was a clause to protect assignees, and another to ex-I
tend the power of the Commissioners, who really have
not the power of keeping order in their own Court. If
a false debt be once proved, it cannot be got rid of,
but by an application to the Chancellor. He was, there-
fore anxious that the Commissioners shoulti have power
to expunge debts when improperly proved, still leaving
an appeal to the Chancellor. In, the country, Soli-
citors of Bankrupts may appoint as Commissioners
whom they please to work the Commission.—(llear.)
This gave offence to Lord Chancellor Rosslyn. and
he fixed lists of Commissioners in certain districts ;
but the present Chancellor had destroyed these,lists.
In this Bill there was a prevision, that in districts
where no such lists existed, country Commissions
should be executed in London. There was a part of
this Bill perfectly new. It was impossible for a man
to give up his time and labour as an Assignee, with-
csut a motive. The consequence was they did not
exert. themselves at all, but left the whole of the
Bankrupt's property to the management of a Solicitor.
in Scotland an Agent was employed, who gave se-
curity, collected the debts, and managed the accounts
of the Bankrupt, on receiving a small ,commission.
There was a clause to enable the Cominissioners to
enquire into the conduct of Bankrupts, and to refuse
.'ertificates if not proper. He had known a Bankrupt
who expended £25,000 in V> months in extravagance.
This man got his certificate very soon, and he be-
lieved had since carried on business, a circumstance
that should not have been allowed in a trading coun
try.—Mr. Montague, the Commissioner, said, in his
evidence, that at Guildhall, there were persons ready
to swear debts, and afterwards to sign certificates,
for a regular
ed small commission on the amount of
debts prov. It was here provided, that where a
bankrupt has had no accommodation paper, nor had
been guilty of fraud, he should bare a certain per,
centage on every dividend made. This was due te
the honest debtor, and he knew no better mode of
preventing crime than by giving the bankrupt a mo-
tive for good conduct. There was also a clause in
this Bill to give perfect protection to the Commis.
sionees; and another to extend the same to Messen-
gars. He moved that the Bill be read a secur.d time.
Mr. ABERCROMBIE said, it was vety diff.ceat
to effect any alteration in the law ; but the Public
were indebted to his Hon. Friend for having brought
fonvard this measure, though he feared it would be
an unsuccessful measure. But the best time for dis-
-1 cussing this Bill would be in the Committee.. He
recommended to separate this Bill into two, one hav-
ing all things mere matter of regulation ; and in the
other all matters altering the present state of the
Bankrupt Laws. In consequence of the difficulties
thrown in the way of the Commissioners of Bank-
rupts,
.it was next to impossible that they should be
able to do substantial justice to all parties, until the
law is administered by persons who can give their
whole undivided time to it. Instead of burdening
the Commissioners with new duties, they ought to be
able to attend to Bankruptcies alone. The division
of the Bill was the only chance it had of passing,
which even then would be very small.
Sir JOHN NEWPORT said, the country could)
not pay too large a tribute of gratitude to iris lion.
Friend for endeavouring so ably to remedy the cry-
ing evils of the Bankrupt Laws.
Mr. Alderman WAITIIM A N agreed to the prin-
ciple of the Bill ; but it would not be complete, until
an alteration was made in the law as to the Com-

missioners.
The Bill was then read 2 second time, and ordered
to be committed on Friday fortnight.
ATTENDANCE AT BALLWPA.
Mr. BLAKE moved, that the order for taking Mr.
Martin, of Galway, into custody as a defaulter, should
be discharged.
Mr. W. WYNNE said, this motion had not been
put on the notices.
After some observations, the Order was discharged.
BARNSTAPLE ELECTION.
Lord CLIVE entered into an explanation of the exi-
deuce before. the Committee, which induced them to
come 'to a resolution that Sir M. Lopes bad been
guilty of bribery and corruption. The Noble Lord
.commented on the evidence taken before the Corn-
niittee—the Committee had come to two Resolutions,
one declaring Sir M. Lopez guilty of bribery, and
the other stating general bribery on the past of the
Electors of the Borough, and recommending that the
Home should take some step upon it. It appeared
from the evidence tbat 27 resident voters had received
from Mr. Qribble, a banker. 51. .per man, on behalf
Of Sir M. Lopes; and further, that the London voters
had received 901. a man. The Noble Lord submitted,
that the evidence fully justified the Committee in re.
commending that the House should enquire into the
and to suggest such an inireasetn the number.
dirftennen as should prevent any recurrence of these
corrupt practices. The Noble L.ovd concluded by
moving, that the Report should betaken into further
consideration. • .
Sir JOHN NEWPORT cougratulated the Noble
Lend on the manner in which he had brought for..
ward this business. The subject could not be in bet.
ter hands ; and he trusted the Nu Lord would
pereevere until he had brought to a conclusion that
which he had so laudably. begun ; and that the House
would skew itself anxious to discharge its duty and
preserve its honour, by sifting such subjects as the
jensent teethe bottom, Whenever they. web
jorward, and not stop shoft of rooting out
Lord COMPTON wits a Member
'Minot, and folly *reed in what had
the ,::ohlt Lord iClive); who, lit

is- 7. SA:

severe In the course he had adopted, and its, whichi
he ha •no doubt, he would receive the assistance
mid support cif the.. Committee.
Mr. RENNET concurred entirely in what had
been stated. •
Mr. W. SMITH was happy this subject had been
btought forward. It was well 'mown that he was
.
what wastalled a Reformer. But he had alimayri been '
of opinion it was equally necessary to reform the itet -
tors as the elected. If that object could be obtained,
much good might be expected to result from it.,
Mr. BLAK E was favourable to reasonable, though
not to visionary, Reform.
Me.W.S:%!IT II was also anxious for reasonable and
temperate Reform, and as great no enemy to eisicinery
inr.ovations as the Honourable Member could be.
Mr. W. WYNN thought then was not such a poi
of general bribery as should operate to disfranchise
the Borough. lie thought all who now had the right
of voting shorld retain that right, And that the ntun-
ber should be increased.
Mr. Alderman HEYGATE did net rise to crone
or to palliate the conduct of the forough of Barusta-
plc. He trusted the House, when the subject came
before it, would take a broad view of it. But he
could not refrain from cautioning the House against, _
;estroying all these Boronglis one after another, by
which the opportunity which the commercial interest
had of being represented would be destroyed also, and
too great a weight and influence would be thrown.
to into the hands of the landed interest.
Mr. GORDON, for the very reason assigned by the
Honourable Alderman atgainst throwing open these
Boroughs, was in favour of that course being adopted.
He knew of no advantage which the Commercial
Interest could derive from that system which had
prevailed in the Borough of Pernstaple, except that
the richest merchant, or the man who could afford
to pay highest, might get elected.
The Resolutions were then agreed to.
Mr. WYNNE moved a Resolution expressive of
the opinion of the House, that gross bribery had been
practised at the late election for. Barnstaple.
This Resolution was also agreed to.
Lord CLIVE then obtained leave to bring in a till
to prevent Bribery and Ccanupticalat future Elections
for the Borough of Barnstaple.
On the motion of Mr. W. WYNN, the Attorney-
General was directed to prosecute Sir AL Lopez for
bribery at the late Election.
On the motion of Lord Wye, it was ordered that
the Speaker should not issue his writ for a new elec-
tion till this day month.
alms azAvaati ATTER CONDEMNATION.
Dr. PULLLIMORE moved for a List of the Ships
seized for a breach of the Excise, or Navigation Laws,
which have been restored by order of the Lards of
the Treasury after sentence of condemnation payed
by any Vice-Admiralty Court. He was more than
a little surprised to understand that thil motion was
to be opposed, the Chancellor of the Exchequer hav-
ing intimated that he saw no objection to,it. Ile
understood that many of these cases had occurred in
Iwhich the Treasury had authorised returns after sen-
Ltence of condemnation in the Vice-Admirelty.Courts. .
He thought the power of their stepping in between :
the sentence of the Court and its execution, was MS
which the Treasury ought not to possess.
.. isir. LUSHLNGTON did not understand his Right
,Honotrxtble friend as having intimate 4 his intention
of agreeing to that motion. He only understood
him to have said, that if the Learned Member would • :
select any specific number of cases, . say twelve or
twenty, they should be granted ; but that .a return
Ifor five years was a voluminous document,. difficult
in making up, and useless when obtained. The Right'
Honourable Member defended the, power which the
Treasury possessed, acrd which he said was found to
facilitate the course of equity and justice. li the
Honourable Member would limit his motion it would
not be objected to. . .
Mr. W YNN could see no difficulty in making the
return, as called for. A clerk, as he conceived, might
mace out a list from the books in a single morning.
• Sir J. NEWPORT did not find fault with the power
having been granted to the Treamey. It might have
been granted for the wisest purposes ; but the Houte
had a right to enquire how the power had been ex.
ercised.—(llea?.)
Mr. FORBES considered the power vested in the
Treasury as having been exercised highly to the ad.
vantage of the public. He must oppose the motion,
unless the Hon. and Learned Doctor stated stronger
grounds for it.
Dr. PHILLIMOR.E replied ; after which the mo-
tion was agreed to for the last year.
NEW POST•OFTICE.
Mr. GORDON censured Governittent severely for
not complying with the Olden of the House some
weeks ago issued for the production of certain Ac-
counts respecting the progress and expense incurred
by the building for the New Post-Office. He al-
ledged that the Treasury and the City of London
bad co-operated for a job. Five weeks had now
elapsed since he moved and carried a motion for the
Accounts now alluded to, and no step appeared to
have been taken to comply with the Orders of the
House. The job which he now condemned would
esiteed £300,000, aiid eller all would prove an
ass expenditure. expenditure. • • •
Mr. LUSHINGTON assuied the Hon. Member
that if lie had waited till the next week he would
have been saved the trouble of his present motion.
As the Accouets desired wpre in a rapid progress P..'
completion, he thought the motion might be wite-
drawn or suspended.
Mr. GORDON declared himself not satisfied. To
check any chanCe of a new job between the Treasury
and the City of London, he t.hoald move " That the
Accounts some weeks ago reeved for, be produced
forthwith."
; Mr. LUSHINGTON ietimated his determination
41) oppose the nation. ' •
Sir .1. N'Er*Prat 'r said, that es the Sefeants of the Crown
Weld obt preterd to be tabus hp surpris:., 6vr weeks having
psed.since the Order et the House, he would support the te?-
Fnter the prod:talon pf the Accounts tortkwuh.
T01.%-iii,INGTON s:-..te.. , ttat the delay had arisen front
Ity3i
ihst ' and of Woilit trot haetrig•teturned the pews presentee to
or their fespection, in order fait the "Accusing might he
5y
seed in as accurate a sit tpt as possible. Eintne additirnal
was of anise necessary, but the House might rest smiled
be
eta_t_notc;enrrtlitent
_sbendol
the itrtlekd.
r, dated the Ist of *Kb- -
0 r • - - -

rl~Cald
,„ ta
b.-, 6;e '
agai
•,4 hit Case
0u
of the
.rta
c Gen
of n
for
""bic Ge.
mir v
1.53 of
OlerC MIO
°r• • sing
f
1
pets
cnS p
Mural and
.3, 13 ATHUR
• General,
jee side
‘!r (Ins
was found
and they has
jell had bee
that no
fat
all should
had said, I
•,,,nght before a
C.ouncil;
[4 uot.goow th
;ca. These ar
they.oec
:op&
-*de around
:4q-made up I
,:.•••
ir• BENNET s.
,
honourable
?„...s...ev at super
Agliot the
el a Lviiv;aalt.
• to lx lievr
::,e testimony of
• Dot his I
▪ besides,
,;,11 'errant%
;bore testimox,
the trot
given u;
h.td beet
What!
they to mak
no answes
tees lead his
0, his poi
)4ionsly break i
;.v to thi, Itte
not ails
gr. SINCLAD
aaan side, and
dissent to u
•le House asai
ry,andrt'
from this
-,...ttits ruin
WI, to order
.54 Those pet
tier could a
Ir. C. HUT(
a the most di
.::,;able Menthe
'chrge, that
rty; but he n
,tat Eaglisi
Act. if
Ai he cornea
oble Lord
-.'iottrable Me,
• his Lordshi
was of irK
ratter of the
• other side h•
Ge
- t as had e,
'tale charge m
Ned tare to si
granted, an,
the whole
' Lord, as to
Grdihary ; bt
%7.d, Ale
c.ne of t
tiara Ger.en
K 2 must there
as to
characts
Wes it not tit.:
!!CMrie to SU C
Tx:id perfori
lenity? He
• Ith Capper, I
vet they k
?ae era: was,
.3soir.f.r put
was free, and
w;:',:e he obe)
alitem of
gl
since as
4 Va; cod
47tould ter
.."` ruble L
-.; ef pri
the eha
tj
,lee
tit'e p
.6r
GEU
tswg Ibte,
cr.e Lid
'siaerai 13.
::1 Itilws
1..' It
lttarE th:
?!441)arte
Lis
'.:37tio it
.441ie a L
11 that ca
trtce ;
11,
'

t
t

CtY aumps.•.
they •wele brought. • Tae Clerk thett re td the Order, dated the tat are worm
Xing out the evil. 31T. GORDON did net want any estended ace's& Be
Tier of this cAom,- ."'"kicroak thaelsCierdwont7s." "mrttlatltentlelskedtv ;tag. °I.
art vis
--- been stated -Y but :air estimate.—The :nation warn eed to, ;Ft at Rd? ran
Misted, wolllti per- Tw,:::e the House Acyarricd to Monday.
,••••••••.". ,•