Star.
London, England, 1828-04-15 00:00:00

838
NumitEit

15, 1828.

•

G , PORTSLOBE - NN,
CONDUCTED BYOYSTER-STREET W. WRIGHT. MOUTH,
ommERCIAL GENTLEMEN are respectfully
Cinformed, that the above Inn is fitted up expressly for their
Accommodation. Respectable references may be had at the Ship
snd gill, Hearndean ; Anchor, Liphook ; Crown, Arundel;
Swan, Chichester; Dolphin, Havant; Black Swan, Winchester;
Crown, Southampton ; and the Red Lion, Fareham.
Good S•abling, with Lock.up Coach Houses.

SMITH'S MEDICAL JURISP
voRUDENCE—Tam Erasion,
!I. ifss.
Dedicated, by permission, to Lord TINTERDIS,
'THE PRINCIPLES of FORENSIC MEDICINE
J. systematically
By arranged, an
SMITH applied to British Practice.
J. G. , M.D.
Lecturer on State Medicine at the Royal Institution of
Great Britain.
Third Edition, with the Author's latest •Corrections.
Printed fur Thomas and George Underwood, 52, Fleet-street.
By the came Author,
An ANALYSIS of MEDICAL EVIDENCE, Bvo. 12s.

BRANDS'S PHARMACY. ax Svo. 149.
AMANUAL of PHARMACY, by WILLIAM
THOMAS BRANDS, Lecturer ou Pharmacy to the
Apothecaries Company, ate. ate.
Printed for Thomas and George Underwood, SS, Fleet-street.
6* T►e object of the presort work is to furnish the student with
a corresponding outline of the Course of Pharmacy annually given
at Apothecaries' Hall."—Preface.

• ' •
...
. ... ,
'..r
L
. : ' :". --... 'll %:.1/' ) - '' ."
. . t -;, : i , . if' • .. ' •
s A
~
A4;111 2 t :. '
.
Ai rt
.0, ' • , 4fr .--...
APRIL

COURT 0'
Idjourned Sittings

In this case
bills of mbar
of Kennedy ,
business at N,
brace and D,
and Maiden(
plaintiffs, ho'
pas, in conjt
chants, of I-I
payment of ,
against the dra
tp prove the'
having *dram
the declaratio

HUBEI

This was a
belonging to t
the River by
facts of the
March, last
Ann, deeply
River, as was
ing W.N. W.
tack. On cot
Reach, the Las,
make way, was
coming from
distinctly pros
barge without
taken (or the
bitration, to sets

This was
opened the pi
Sir JAMes
this action th(

square, Fleet.

carrying on
mises, and thi

by the workii
was a garden

some years

office on it, a

had occasioned
deccribe to

this building,

ing a nuisance,
him. It did

brought nail
Salmon, who
Tinily sold

ever, before

at the same,

mites, and p
plaintiff and

much incon.

The folio%
Mr. G. Sim
my father hat _ 600
upwards of twenty years. Th-e printing-nffize, foresseily
the property of Mr. Bensley, is euthe back of nue house ;
there was' a garden there formerly; Mr. Bensley built
the printing-offite. The present defendants succeeded
Mr. Bensley in the possession of it. Inconvenience is
experienced at my father's premises from the operstions
of the printing•office. A great noise proceeds from the
steam engine working the presses; that•happens both
day and night. The front part of the premises, is not
so much inconvenienced as the back. All,the,.fansily
complain of the noise, and I experience it as a
Eieri{ in-
convenience myself; but am not much distuibedin my
sleep, as I lay in the front parlour. There is a:sensible
vibration, like that on board a steam-packet; the vibra-
tion makes the fire irons jingle. We are also incon-
venienced by the smoke, which fills the win4ow•siills
with blacks. We are obliged to keep our windows ann.
Crosi-examined by Mr. BROUGHAU—There used to
be printing presses worked by band before the steam-
engine was set up. My father is a furrier ; be beats his
skins at the top part of our premises, but it does not
make a great noise.
Mr. Edw. Smith examined--This witness confirmed
the evidence of the last. On his cross-examination,
he said that the chimney of the printing-office was
very lofty.

Mrs. Smith, the wife of the first witness, gave similar
evidence, and added, that the furniture, particolarlx in
the back part of the bouse,waspach soiled by the smoke.
Elizabeth Kiddie examined—Witness was trousiiiaid
to Mr. Smith. The noise was sometimes so great rh the
night as to wake her. If any of the back windOws were
open the place was filled with !stacks from the chim-
ney. When she first went there Ole could not sleep for
the noise.
Cross.examined—The noise has not been so 'great
lately, nor so frequent as it was at first., She first went
there about eighteen months ago. _
Elizabeth Manning and Elizabeth I:Whirl-Hie service
of Mr. George Smith, gave similar tAtimony. •
Mr. Jar min examined—Witness resides at Sandwich,
and has visited Mr. Smith. The 'first time .he, slept
there, in Auenss, 1826, the noise was so great duo, it
disturbed- his
•tea, and he thought it was something
going on in the house. About five weeks ago be slept
[there again. The noise was not so great, but It, di:-
tutbed his rest.
Mr. Fairy, an engineer, attended the view raked by
the Jury. There are two steam engines and boilers on
the premises. Only one was worked. Thete were four
pre:ser. Two of them were worked, both ?with and
without types, in the presence of the Jary, :the large
machine in the middle of the zoom was worked It the
rate of seventeen impressions in a minute, or 1,020 an
hour. At each impression there is ra jerk. ..Xhoother
machine was worked, at the rote of eleven a minute.
That was whilst the. Jury were in Mr.,Satias'a riouse.
The machine was wtred, but the:lmes no actual print-
ing ; that, he theme*, would have made More noise.
The pulleys on one machine were larger than usual,
which had the effect .of lessening the noise, and making
it go slower. No printing press worked by hand makes
so much noisetasthe most quiet steam presses.
Mr. Wooller examinedrfx reside at N 0.2, Gough-
square my. house is epd,siti the plaintiff's. The
square is not I very wide. iihk'not near enough to hear
the noisitibst the what! sijnisilittiffected by the smoke.
Crostelainined—The chimixe7loficg.lpily, and can

. c~

ti...‘:-. ,f;,"
'....._ .., ,
Ifs 7/
ifri4l4ll
• • s - , ,
. . .., .
. ...
*
liiiirosslowsloor - ,
, 4
- [PRICE SEVENPENCE:•
11
LAW :INTELLIGENCE. - -. -.
o
)F KING'S BENCH, Guu.onaza., Ann. ;4.
lugs for Loudon after Hilary Term, before Lord
TOIVIRDRIN and Special Juries. i . 1
ARID AND OTHERS V. SMART. .
se the defendant had drawn a number of , I
Inge. amounting in all to 15,0001. in favour
- and Maitland, merchants; casrying on , t
New York. The acceptors, Messrs. Fite- . I )avison, of Havre, having failed, Kennedy s
Id were obliged to stop payment. The
twever, well known brewers-in the metro. r
;
junction with Lennox and Maitland, mer. l'
Flamburgh, advanced the money for the
'l4
the bills. They now brought their action t
drawer for the amount; but not being able
fact of Mr. Lennox, one of the plaintiffs, I t 1
_ u,
'need any part of the money, as stated is
ion, the Court directed a nonsuit.
RAT V. HUTCHINSON AND OTHERS. • .1
an action to recover the value of a harge i•..
the plaintiff, which had been run down in u
r a brig belonging to the defendants. The ;'' ik
ease were very short. On the 13th of . ;'•
year; the barge, mimed the James and : 1 1 ,
i llr laden with cement, was coming up the to 1
ts a brig named the Griffin. The wind be- I .•
r. both vessels were obliged frequently to ; 1
oming up to the Chapman Sands, in Sea
barge tacked, and before she had began to
- )'
vas struck and sunk by the brig, which was ,
a the opposite side of the River. It was 1; 0
owed that the brig could have avoided the $
at difficulty by bearing up. A verdict was , 4.11 ;
e plaintiff, subject to a reference to an ar- •- . i
settle the amount of damages. , 1 ;
~
SMITH O. MILLS AND OTHERS. ' .11
an action for a nuisance. Mr. Cummins t V
pleadings. • 1
SCA/IL/ITT stated the case to the Jury. In I
le plaintiff was a furrier, residing in Gnugh- I, ,
et-street. The defendants were printers,
business at the back of the plaintiff's pre-
I)
he nuisance complained of was occasioned
ing of their steam engines.• Formerly there
n at the back of the plaintiff's premises, but
1$
back Mr. Bensley had erected a painting -1 4 r
and set steam engines to work in, it, which l'
rued the nuisance, which the witnesses would
them. Whilst Mr. Bensley was .erecting a
;, he received notice that insase-of its rev- I, • -
nce, an action would be brought against
id rove a nuisance, atudi-an; ectioit'wes
uinst Mr. Bensley by a neigh:Wow of hri,:Mr.
,o recovered damages.. - :Mr.....8e01ek isibte- •
i the premises to the defendants, who,.how- ,
the purchase, were made aware they-would I!
e time buy pla suit. TWO .to4lc the: re.
moderate. • It
promised to . nderete the. oitisinee. The /
d his family, however, continuing to be as :, 1
iveniencesl-as ever; new brought this action.
,wing witnesses were then called: - us I.
;mid), jun.-1 am the son of The plaintiff; 1 .
has occupied the premises in Goughadispeo
twenty years. The printing-office, formerly ,• ,
r of Mr. Bensley. is at back of our home :