Star.
London, England, 1804-05-29 00:00:00

KILIKAINHAM SESSIONS, MAY 113.

Biwa Byrne was arraigned on two indidinents for
wilful and corrupt peri;iiry, at the profecuCon of the
King through the Right Hon. the Earl of Rofcnin-
mon. The depofitions of the prifoner againft this No-
bleman at a former Salons were recapitulated in the
arraignment, viz. that his Lordship, acceonpanie#l4
Mark Madden, Eiq. did ail-atilt, beat, batter, and
abufe the prefent culprit at the gate of his Lordthip's
demefne near Booteritown ; that his I,ordthip koeck-
ed her down, and that Mr. Madden beat her in the
face, and with an unmerciful blow knocked one two
*1 her teeth.. On their charges billsof incinihment were
found againft Lord Rolcommern and Mr. Madden,
who flood trial for the fame, and were both bottoms-
bly acquitted.
The tit it indiement refulted from the alledged per-
jury committed by the culprit, on Woo wee evidence
before the Seffions Court ; the fecund indittmeat was
grounded on the lady's written examinations, (worn
to before Wm. Greenthields, Eiq. a Magitirate for
the county of-Dublin.
Mr. G , for the culprit, moved to have her
trial poftponed to the next fitting day of the prefest
1.:1"ions.
IMr. M'Naccr, for the proficutian, fray of the
inconvenience of podponernent to any dillant day,
as that would probably interfere with the military
duty of Mr. Madden, who would fhottly be under a
necedity of leaving the kingdom.
The Chairman faid,' he felt it indifpenfably need-
Cary to colipone the trial until the next &Crimea, hav-
ing iitioreftions on his mind that precluded him front
trying the cafe hirr,felf, and mould gam time for ap-
plication to Mr. Sergeant Moose to fit in his place.
The woman was liberated on renewal of recogni- -
zaoce befrre the Court, and her hufband admitted as
one of her bail, but not before he was purged, by ac-
quittal of a capital indietritent for dealing eleven
Ib-ep, the property of Solomon Eagle, who depofed
that lie relided at Aftgrove, in the County bf Dublin,
but had another farm in the fame c.iunty, on which
he had a number of Iheep, eleven of which lie loft, and
made diligent inquiry for them the very day after he
miffed them • five of the number he got at one He-
ny's, botcher is Fleet-market, andslifcrivered three
more in an oat-hoofe belonging to one Byrne, a
hotelier, at Booterflown. Witnefs recoguifed the
whole as his property by his own brand.
Aansrenec FITZ° Solicitor for the
Crown, was proceeding to examine the witnefs
pe~in rgalc declarationstoiae in dew, which thetrprg. oner's
R 0
p wile was
ped anely.
ledexaminadonrefpeeirg the woman as illegal evidence.
The learned CaAlessas, in .(tenting to this idea,
on well k-novro grounds of law, remarked, if wives
were permitted to hang their hufbands, that Jack
Ketch would loon get into a train of unietniiting
employment.
The profecutor not being able to bring any mate-
rial pouf againft the prifoner, be was nectffarily ac-
quitted.
Chark, Holland was acquitted on a capital india-
nient, for having affaulted John Smith, on the Crum
lin Road, and taking from his perfoo half a crown in
c..!!). a great coat, and a horfewhip. The piano-
tor identified the prifoner with exadnefs, es haying,
about the hour of three o'clock, affaulted him, and
committed the robbery laid in the indidir.ent—but
it appeared that he acknowledged general!, to a
Captain Orde and others, that he could old) (wear
to his belief. The prifoner received an C. 1.1-
rAaer from the Rev. Mr. Walker, hlagidrate tat the

minty.
The CitaORMAN charged the Jury with his aCCU-
iionicel himunity—who returned a etrditt without
I. tt .r. the box.

'luckily forenoon, as two porters, Joys !1/41t:ILDOCSI
:end
jAmes MYLII I, Were Clirrtilig at. aof do AKtri
o the garret o! one of ti.e new itouf..s in St.
Vincen.-iirett, 01.41pw, they by f..tne fOl
front the t'p of the stair (which it not re: r .11.-.1) to

. . . .
.liti.e ht:.-irn, and were beta fo lercrclT h.-bircd, ;tat
My i !I II expired in an 11.1 r After, and .slotonem died
or. Filtlay mottling. in he litni ma: y.
Thit4liy fi.'ntright, a fcrvant Vili. while cl-erieg
the cu.. 1.1.: cif a oinciow, on the tnird linity of a
bOtlii. f 4r 4:.0 CI:fS 0: PAiiky. 11atc..irtiniacc,y WI
d mi. n ,r,,, the ii.icoetent, and bad a leg and an a• in
Ibri.ke by the LAIL '.Lk e poor girl is however likely
to fits-via, .

t.OAlj fILOVC,

TA you Tern t &re the Dean of kit Collets once GU%
('are Lis Rey'rerce that day 11E14 Zifpos'.l for a wlaudlai)
rrk.•u^.t i ,teirrr ran &WA rut my her,
i•h•-.t f.,lng you fire:ling about ilia quadrangle.
Atrl I, Sir the ynitb was not flow in replying,
(t fe to brazen it nut with an Impudent flee meant.)
Aberst the Twins& eann't atoll Without (piing
You alluding yont lead. Mr. Dean. three your eacensent."

I.AW INTELLIGENCE.

coutur OF KING'S BENCH, MAY a.

d.tr the llttings at Wellmintlar terminated.
They cur:menet to-maw itif at Guildhall, where 143
catiles are let down for trial► in the fbort interval be-
fore the commencement of Trinity Term.

HARRIS V. J. CHICMISTIII, 1104
The Plaintiff is an eminent jobruas in bottles, the
Defendant, a gentleman well known on the turf, re.
Tiding on his elate in Devon(Lire. The forme,. had
pnrthafed of the latter a coach-horfe, at the price of
forty'graneas, under the warranty of his being quiet
in has def. The hot le had been offered for (ale by
the Plaintiff to Lord Roislyn, and had been reject-
ed, onsthe firli trial, on ac.:ount of the fymptums of
reltivenefs he exhibited.
Mr. GAIROW, for theTlaintiff, Paid, Lord fferfaTn
could not attend to give tell imony, on aeconnt of a
(evert indifpofition ; but reverel of his let vants de-
pokd to the violent refinance, and rintradahleneA of
the animal, on the necafion of the firll experimrst
fo As to endanger the lives of the perfons autmp
to tritroul him.
Mr. Easetriz, for the Defendant' produced teffi•
many to the quietnefi of the animal for a period of
'vine yeall: he laid, tha the bean, like himfelf, had
'often gose as leader, foirteerits • • mar forndimes as the
other, and that like himfilf alfn be had been found
I:eft/4 trogails sss eitherfuls. He then fent for Na-
thaniel F,llaws, Efq. from the Middlefea Commit-
tee, who had frequently driven the bode, and pre
evidence to his filet), I and, left of all, he called
Jnkn Gilpin, to thew he iad we ras away with kin.--
He further proved, that he had been driven at bar.
rows. and in 'a unicorn team, or what is called a
coach and three. The Learned Counfel then (aid,
he should come to the conclufive depofition a leer*
and produced teitimony to the anima having bees
driven in a taxdout.
Loed Extsraoutonne.-.-4, This is a horfc fold
under a warranty to go temperately in irarnefs, and
the evidence on both ides is tftrong and contradio-
toey. O. the part of the Defendant there is a
them, as the tradable difpofition of the animal had
aint-beeri brought up to the precife time of the (ale to
the Flaiwiff, and a horfe very quiet might be foon
tendered ferocious and unmanageable by abut" and
wantonnefs."—Verdid for the Defendant.

TOWN Ilh DAILY..

This was an etion for the hire of a hacknee-enach.
The PlaintiS had hired out a coach to the Defendant
at the rate of 35. a daT, which he proved. The De-
fendant contended that he yaws only to pay at the
sate of half-a-crown a day for the coach, and lodged
a funs of 31. !as. in Court, which would be the
amount of the Plaintiff's demand at that rate.
Seseralliackoey-coachmen were produced to prove
' that as. 6d. was the ufual price; but, the• Ipecial
weement being proved, the Jury flund A verdinf.r
the Plaintiff tar. which was the difference between
31. and as. 6d. per day.
04411110. STIMART.
The Plaintiff is a journeyman, the Defendant a'
tinder taimatt. The Plaintiff worked for the De-
fendant. A difference arofe between them as to the
fain due to the Plaintiff on a Saturday night. The
Defendant called the Plaintiff a rafcal. He Paid he
eras no MOM a rafcal than the Defendant ; hi:-
words *mfr. The Defendant knocked off the hat of
she Ptaintiff and kicked him nut, &c
. Mr. Eascia s &id there were tooosoo journeymen
tradebnen in London, and if each of them biotight'
1 art affirm spina his maffer for fuck a fquabble as
this, Maud of &we're, there might to be one hen
dyed and forty4rur ledges. Verdi& for the Plaintiff,
Damages one tilling.
1' H,)11111S. V. PALMIII.
'this was an aftion brought to recover the ex-
pellees of an indienieut which the Dsfendant had
profecuted againfl the Plaintiff's wife.
It appeared that the Plaintiff's wife had pnrchafed
goods of the Defendant's wife, who is a broker,
about which a di'pnte had arifen--that from words
they Cam* to blows. The Defendant's wife then
procured a Bench Warrant againa the Plaintiff's;
street which file was arrefled, and confined in the
Watch Houle an entire night. When the cattle Came
so be tried at the Middlefer Seffitms, there was no
..rfearanoe on the Nit of the profecution, and the
Defendant in th.tt .i.ait.n was )4v:witted.
TllVTl,;ntiff :In-: fought to teenver the expellees
of the crimin.4l prniccution againft the Dilenttittit ;
1 hat it etmiii-,7, (Ns( in the carne of 0,- e,•idt•nce, that
the ar4o!t1:Icl '•lerl 4 '',l l:1i giVf.n hj M. Tborna-
(the l'h.itittf., v.ii:,, ihe 11.iiiit.if t....ts iii.inctlitcd

CJI.Lt.,An

1,16 rr

x:: cfiminh cr.
TM.. was ..),r i cenlc r lorAt
and it n a tticicr 1.17:11ar ciectini!tan-r nt the
ddercr he.: tr. cntidtfied. i,V .:ie Attorney. hr C:.•
gi fr4.lTl the
attcr.dr.:--e e '
had t•. 1,.. 11,
141rr.(.1.10•
Ilre

id r x

hAd t;

t:l
firr,

li,t, k m

:t. tit- arealt 1.11

ws.eziA.

iv7.l

t Are

li , I

1,1

;,