Star.
London, England, 1828-03-24 00:00:00

THE - WATCHMAN'S SONG.
The Visatehmen In •Oarmany amuse themselves during the night hy
sitteng their national songs. as well as others of a more clever
from character ;of the Inter, tbe following Is a specimen, taken
from site very interesting work, the Adams an the Rhine.—
When the voices are good, which. Is frequently the case, the
effect is solemn and pleasing*
Hark, ye neighbours, end hear me tell—
Ten now strike. on the belfry bell!
Ten are the Holy Commandments given
To man be'ow—from GOD in Heaven !
Human watch from harm can't ward us—
Goo will watch and GOD will guard us;
Hz, through his eternal might,
' Oleo us all a blessed night !
Hark, ye neighbours, and hear me tell—
Eleven sounds on the belfry bell !
Eleven Apostles of holy mind,
Taught the Gospel to mankind! •
Human watch, &c.
Hark. ye neighbours, and hear me tell—
Twelve resounds from the belfry bell!
Twelve•Diecipki to issue came,
Who suffered rebuke for their Savages's name!
Human watch, &C.
Hark, ye neighbours, and hear me tell—
One. has peal'd on the belfry bell!
One Goo above. one Loan indeeil,
Who bean as Unit in hegira need
Human watch, &c. •.! •• • -
Hark, ye neighbours, and beer me tel.—
Two resounds from the belfry. bell !
Two paths before mankindl are free,—
Neighbour choose the best for thee!
Human watch, &c.
Hark, ye neighbours, andiner tea--
Then lOW ulls ea the belfry bell!
Treefold minas the Heavenly. Host,
nista, Sox, and HOLY Guoirtl,;, ; ,
Human watch, &c. ' •
.

LAW INTELLIGArcL

COURT OF CHANCEiY. Mum tfl.
TUR eiNOLOR SPAM D. MILLZTT MID °TWIRL
Mr. Pam appeared in support of a demurrer which
had. been filed to the amended bill in this suit. He
contended4hat the demurrer ought to be allowed, be-
cause the King of Spain being a foreign sovereign, and
in iso sense liable to the process or within the The of the Coutt, could have no right to sue. The case
whith:lrad been.decided by the Vice-Chancellor lately,
in which he ruled that the Colombian Government
could trot sue' had, he submitted. established this rule.
Mt LORD CHANCELLOR said, he apprehended that
iedtitin was upon the ground of the, alleged Govern-
'meat not being one recognised bytisis country.
Mr. PetsrO submitted, that there could be no such
Inquiry into the right of the King .of Spain to sue, as
might be had in the case of another person. For the-
King' of Spain sued as King, and therefore to inquire
'whether be had a right to do so would be to try his
title to the throne of Spain.
The LORD CRANCIILLOR said that was matter of too
great notoriety tote questioned in that Court.
Mr. PEl'n then insisted that the King of Spain was
pot entitled to sue, because he was not under the same
Liabilities as other persons who sued ; this was a dttS-
cUlty whith he considered insutmountable,Another point
was, that the King of Spain sued as the trustee for per-
sons who were entitled to that indemnification, the.
amount of which had been received by Machado, and

was the subject of the suit. The Lai did not pretend
that the King of Spain had or could have Any other
fish( to sue than as a trustee. Now, according to, the
practice of the Court, a trustee could not sne on behalf
of others, unless he brought them in some shape or
other before the Court, and there was no description
here of who were the cella pre trusts. He insisted also
that the object of the suit was-one which a Court of
Equity could not intelfere with.
Mr. HORNS and Mr. WIESATLIX were heard on the
other side. _ _ _

The Loan CKANCELLOR -overruled the demurrer.
The former proceedings in the cause, he said, had gone
the length of showing that the King of Spain wai the
only party who could see. It was quite clear that
the defendants had oct right to retain the Money. He
therefore ordered them to answer the bill in a month.