Star.
London, England, 1829-03-30 00:00:00

LIVERPOOL /tI,

Flow
Rap.

Corrow—The Import this week 14 5,
only 8,530 bass (itsclud,us .500 Bowe
prices &awe barn with difficulty ni.intait
advice. from New Yotk than those

prates of Uplands 8/ to 10, and Nemo(
&Jou, &v.—We have had very 110,
duce, and prices are barely maintained.
this week are limited to ISO casks, witb
About 400 bags East India beer been

with 300 bags Mauritius at Mo. and a
38s per cwt.
Paovososni—We bait experiettet d
titans ut Suiten this week, and tor the I
as. per cwt. advance has been abash ed.
Bacon the s.les have been limited, and ,
COAL MARKET, Tots
The Coal-Exchange was pretty well
day, but no great deal ut I,llllllless Wi
seventeen new ships were at market,
ace at sea, and m..y be expected by WI
Bert Writ's End coals . 35,
Other sort• . • • ir7,
Ships at market . .

5.1/
611faRs DbrEr.uag. Ai
b fine Mr.
lone • ffice, t• r Runt es*. I
Jed wish pee sor.s aorta us
a •e. The /1 NI. Ct lonel 41
agree a trudcd ;
!ti hinetstrate that he
es's be Ait, nor se As he
ur rinte-s•rnal adviser
eel I.e lectly composed,
ion, i
Ise, Duke-s•reet, reeapi-
n the inquest.
gh street, Mary •lai bonne. ae-
(the deceased at right o'clock
witnessed the appearances he
deuce. where be described the
• the finvr on the le t side,
wuusou asks! it Such 3 deist
an was I:viog ? •
:here appear to be any ssynns.
plea y• I
r end his throi, ? tK
lick I untied, and 1 had no
i o•
pinion as to the cause of ;1
t pressure on the lower psi I's
cturrst inn sir. hlwAle
you have since seen, hi that
is l never heard any of the eir-
's death, ,hould you have come .
II I had 4 remitted tl.e body so
iv concluord ,i,Je be i,ad b -en
Louse wit:s the imprestion on
f.
le- nuts-.
li)r the
;roe:eau:lh' swwl ti": :huatasnoudwcritanf
e nose
live. 1 uoder,tool.
t to believe they were done
4 •
mul.ture At the Mouth would
It'd drunk of apopl•sy, thtre
e at tbc mouth, hut there was
4
an you touched it?
though he might have been a
•
would have been warmer if it
•ed it would certainly be colder
ulred if a Gentleman named
t, at NO. Y, Norahumberl ,nd-
I to hint. ai.d he expected be
•14 r the name tame furo aril, and
h.at he ell.: not c•m-ider Mr.
he could JO 111/ otherwise than
erbed you, - •
ttl do all I run for you, as yon
Sir.
ce: tar
wporurail
de
bthat
ethe ...kumwdot
by
riiig his extensive practice ha
.Istiary contortion of Use, MAC,
ism respiration.
un the brain kale been e4used
rat Maud?
body when it was Ern dis-
ood was prJihiced by excessive
'ter quantity o•I the than
urn, have beep produce.; by his
I 1
In his sore, that would have
witti Mr. Prookos and ;.:r.
Ilan had Leen sastf scat at, %Ir.
v‘ished vs pat aiiv mot,
inn Norris whetft-t is was not
n she bard her mai.t.r dne?
, it was."
ini to N.:weate for the nsurder,
agai.s.t.hins 1-. r rho toisisery.
10 obtain a view LlSl.4rwa.
at S r.ansi•!‘ ih •17th
nu, ere C•4l rinsed. It
ori:sr amount . f purrstty
ee tl•e y• a- 1/0). Ihe
ert) destroyed I. Ards
. •
the Symint-y -ch o er.
rf, at thr,
d body 1,11 aln 1113'.1 14
sittsincr, dew 4/. I.IC
held, and a rr•dist cf
'lie .Irceastd appear t
se, ks. •
•
LtK-I,AS7K, Masco
▪ morning With t,
, and but Sew country t•u) es.,
f; last Alondey's puke., Is .v.
i; but their sy» nu kl-nia
Holey went iff .4.wty at Ls.
;•e'tietlielhac:Sil:oiiiiidi:.i):;l:s:uiCislitiattl:te. 141:: 'l/
I
ess, Grey 544 Ms
erns, Small 56. sits j t
Tick 32.544
au, Potator SOs 339 ,
Polawl 28s 31s
Feed 20.96.
our, per CO;. 65..
ap.sred 234 kg. per last.
IST WISC. •
1.11 oats , 1,6114
ye, Kaylish ' t,
utn, 1..4. reign •
Irish
10.9
Vas. Fatglisit 6.50 •
f•tto Fir eta 820
nglish Flour, sacks 4,496
merieau ditto, bail
KET, Marten 50.
ea ELT.
Pip 150 I Calves 115
eel . . 54 Od to es Od
wk . . es led es td
• "
Clover £2 IS. to XS Ow—
I '
MARCH
3,47.2 bags, and the sales are
weds taken fur expo.,), ai.d
I 1
trained. There are iaa I.t.r
of 25th Fab. which quoted I •
'um of Exchan,4e 61
sego demand fie (Nsiolli•ltres•
led. The Wes ni ILP Sara : i%I
itbout any alteratsta. ui prie..l.
dipossd of at 71s. to 7sls.
a few chests basil at 24.. to
• good demand f..r all descrip. if 1 giber descriptil4it (Intuits. to
and
J. Bret dull; h 1 l'ork
I price, rather looking dowo. :f
its DAT .11T 010.. I
11 attended by meicb .11i1
,
Nil done. Otte Ino.ated aid
, and 4 con.iderable qoantitr
iednesday next
Si 6d 54s 9d si, 0.1 .
• 0,1 to 51:4 44 .111
1511
. •

LAW INTELLIGE

COURT OF CHANCERY, MA ca 2&

.Till THRLLUSSON wILL.-THELLL'SsON v. R'OODWIIIORD.
The LORD CHANCELLOR delivered, his judgment in
this case, which was a question on the cottstructinn of
' the Thellusson will, so celebrated for its grmd p►oject
of accumulation. This will provided for the creation
of trustees for the Management of the testator's immense
estates, and for the appointment of new trustees in lieu
of those who should be removed by death or should re-
-lose to act. The point was, whether the provision in the
will, that the said trustees should have the privilege of
residing in the mansion atßroadsworth,applied to the new
at well as the old and original trustees? His Lordship
'thought, as it had been decided on three former occa-
sions when the question had been before the Couttlthat
it was clearly the testator's intention that all the trus-
tees :horrid reside in the mansion, for thg purpose of
more carefully looking after the estates ; but it was
equally clear, from the tenor of the will, that he did not
intend that such an establishment should be maintained
as it appeared was now kept up there. He should,
therefore, couple the decision of the Court with an
order to refer it to the Master, to consider what kind of
establishment should be kept up in the family mansion,
in order to fulfil the intentions of the testator in that
respect.
ROWLAND STEPMENSON—HODOBON fl. MURRAY.

Mr. Heim, on the part of the defendant, moved to
discharge an order which had been obtained from the
Vice Chancellor, restraining proceedings upon an action
at 14w. The plaintiff had had some dealings with Mr.
R. Stephenson in respect to a bill of exchange f it 8,0001.
which, on the face of it, the plaintiff,llr.'Ho4son, was
liable to pay. It appeared by the statements contained
in the bill. that the bill in qtr. scion had been allowed to
remain in ti.e hands of Mr. Stephenson upon his earnest
request ;'and that the plaintiff knowing that he had dis-
charged himself from all liability, and that he might
have the bill whenever he chose to apple for it, gave
himself no further trouble respecting it. The bill fur-
ther stlt,:l, that just previous to the departure of Mr.
Rowland Stephenson from this country, under circum.
stances which had been disclosed, he had made a dis-
h nest use of the bill, and had negotiated it with the
defendant, Mr. A. Murray. The Learned Counsel ob-
served, that however true these statements might be,
Mr. Murray was a bona ,de holder of the bill of
etc 'ange, and had given a valuable consideration
for it. Applicatio is had been made to Mr. Hodg-
son for the payment of the bi;l of exchange, and
upon a refusal, defendant had thought fit to commence
an action at law for the recovery of the 8.0001. Instead
of meeting that action, Mr. Hodgson had filed a bill. in
Order to stay all legal proceedings, and the Vice Chan-
cellor' had deemed it proper to accede to the prayer of
that bill, by staying all proceedings at law. It had
been urged in the Court below that Mr. Murray knew
that the bull was overdue; that no payment was ex-
pected to be made upon it; and that Mr. Stephenson
had had it long in his possession ; and that Mr. Murray
.took the bill with the same equities attached to it as
existed between Mr. Hodgson and Mr. Stephenson.
The Learned Counsel stated that the giound upon which
he.now sought to set aside the injunction was, that the
same statements which had been made as a reason fur
staying all proceedings at law might ha* been with
equal propriety enforced in defence to the action at
law, and that the question was one fittest lot a Jury to
decide
Mt. SuoDaN and Mr. Cuanu, in support of the in-
' ' junction, went over the same grounds as were orged
before his lion •ur the Vice Chancellor, insisting that
the plaintiff was completely exonerated. the.defend ant
_having taken the bill with all the tquities dttakhed to
it. There was another circumstance svOithy rf consi-
. del scion, that when the bell came into the defendant's
possession the n.me of the indorser had been erased, and
the defendant must have been acquainted with all the
• facts connected with the bill. Tne Learned Clunsel
contended that there was no practice for the action at
law, and thaCthii was precisely such a case as required
the interposition of the strong and merciful protection
• ola Court of Equity.
'file LORD CHANCELLOR said he would consider of
the judgment, and give his opinion in a few days.