Star.
London, England, 1821-07-05 00:00:00

irr NEXT TUESDAY, 10ru JULY.

TBISH, of the Old State Lottery Offices, 4,
• Conihill, and 9, Charing-Cross, Landon, begs to call the
ate wino of his best Friends, the Public, to the important ad-
santa„tes offered to those who purchase Tickets or Shares of the
present I. utery, befote NEXT TUESDAY, 10th of JULY.
Du that Uay One of £24,ooo—One of £l6,ooo—Two of £2,100
ss►T:vo ui £6oo—Ten of .0230—Ten of £LO.S—Twenty-five of
£4O-1,200 of £ll,
MUST ALL BE DRAWN,

And .11 those Persons who do rot obtain Prizes that day, may,
if they think proper, return their Tickets and Shares, and re-
save b..ck nearly three-fourths of their money, provided they
are returned before Tuesday, the 17th instant, as will be seen
by the following statement :
Present Price. Money back.
A Strrarwrn costs £1 14 6 but may receive back 61 3 6
An EIGHTH costs 5 8 0 but may receive back 2 6 0
A QUARTER costs 615 0 but may receive back 412 0
A HALF ...... costs 13 7 0 but may receive back 9 4 0
♦ Twicsr ...... costs 24 19 0 but may receive back 17 0 0
After having had the Chance of the above
1,2.51 Prizes. which must all be drawn
NEXT TUESDAY.

Those who do not return their Tickets or Shares before the
17th July, will hare the Chance of ALL the other Prizes in the
following SCHEME,
Without Classes, to be drawn 10th, 17th, and 21st July:
1 of 4'25,000 Consols ...... X25;000
1
2
1
1 ...... 15,000 Consols
2 . 3,000 Consols
2 2,400 Consols
2 2,100 Consols
2 1,200 Consols
2 600 Consols
6 400 Consols
6 250 Consols
10
30 105 Money
20
40 Money
41 *5 Money
21 Money
1,015 .. 12 Money
1,100 ... 11 1 le. Money
1,200 ... 11 Money

4,800
4,200

Total £lBB,OlO
Consols and Money.
The 1,251 Capital and other Prizes that must be drawn Nest
Tuesday, form part of the above Scheme.
The option of returning ceases on Tuesday, the 17th July ;
and those persons who do not return their undtawn Tickets and
Shares before that day, will have the chance of the 2,248 Capi-
ial and other Prizes that will be drawn 17th and 21st instant.

12,991 Tickets.

Tickets and Shares are selling at BISII's Offices,
No. 4, CortNinLi;and 9, CH* RING-CROSS LONDON;
. -

. . .
And by his Agents in the Country,
Who sold 14,041, a Prize of X 21,000 ! besides ELEVEN other
Capitals on the 28th May and 14th June.
Cr Schemes, with full Particulars, gratis.

THE remarkable properties of medicines have en-
gaged the attention of ntar•.kind in all ages, and to the
sagacity, industry, and good fortune of inquirers, the world is
iadebtcd for many valuable discoveries. Among these there
are some which have maintained their claim to distinction fot
a long period of time, and have commanded approbation as real
additions to the general stock : the CORDIAL; BA LM of GI-
. LEA D lays claim to this distinction, as no remedy has hitherto
been discovered which proves so geni:rally beneficial in disorders
of the nervous systvin and of the digestive organs. In trembling
of the limbs, palpitation of the heart, vertigo, fiatulence,lowness
et spirits, and general debility, and in the symptoms of a cold,
bilious, and consumptive habit, its efficacy is very great. Whe-
ther usAl to give relief to those who have reason to repent as
eac.:ssiv, t; aa g..nce of the passions or the habits of fashionable
rgt, great Attention to business, or juvenile indiscretions,
that at the root of health and vigour, it will be found an
lavata.ib.i. bracer and iiivigorant.
It is svl.l by Mr. Johnston, 68, Cornhill; Mr. Sanger (late
Bazaii Co.) IA Oxford-street; Mr. Ward, Holborn; Mr.
`Strad:Lig, Royal Exchange, London; and all Medicine Venders,
la bottles at Its. and 535. each.

This day was published,
In Two Volumes 12rno. price 14s. boards,
QT. AUBIN ; or, Ton INPIDEL.—., This is a Tale
of horrors and desolation. It is, nevertheless, told with force
and elegance, and shows talents which only require practice to
gain them the admiration they deserve. The language, though,
in general elegant, occasionally betrays the author as belonging
to a sister nation, for which, however, he may console himself by
the reflection, that he likewise shares in the fervid eloquence and
fruitfulness of imagination by which her writers arc eminently
distinguished in the annals of Polite Literature."—New Monthly
Magazine, No. IV.
" The character of St. Alibis himself is powerfully given;
and that of the wild and impassioned, but kind and good-hearted
Lady Gertrude, has an air of freshness, if not of originality,
about it. The death scene of this Lady is awfully impressive ;
and I envy not the feelings of those who can read it unmoved.
We conclude, with merely returning our thanks to the author,
of whatever sex, for the pleasure which we have received from
a book so moral, well written, and deeply interesting."—Edin-
burgh Magazine for April 1821.
" Many of the incidents of the story are of no simple kind ;
but are strong materials, which have been used with powerful
effect. The style and general sentiments of this work indicate the
author to he a Lady, and one possessing a mind of no ordinary at-
tainment and power."--Edinburgh Monthly Review for May.
Printed for Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh; and G. and W. B.
Whittaker, Ave-Maria•lane, London.

PROCEEDINGS ON THE BILL OF PAINS AND
PENALTIES, COMPLETH.
HANSARD's PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES.
The Third Volume of the NEW SERIES of this Work,
which commences with the Accession of his present Majesty, is
ready for delivery. In this and in the Second Volume will be
found the whole of the important Proceedings on the 13111 of
Pains and Penalties against her Majesty the Queen. No pains
have been spared to give those Proceedings with the greatest ac-
curacy. The Debates which took place in the several stages of
the Bill will be found detailed at great length. The eloquent
Speeches of the Counsel who appeared for and against the Bill
have been carefully revised and corrected, and compared with
the Notes of the eminent Short-hand Writer to the two Houses,
obligingly communicated by the Agents on both sides for that
purpose. And the Examilittions in Chief, the Cross-examina-
tions, the Re-examinations, the Kaaminatior.s of the Lords, to..
gethtr with the Qatestions propounded to the Learned Judges
and their Answers, the sundry Reports, Protests, &c. acc. have
all been faithfully transcribed from the Minutes and Journals of
the House of Lords. The Editor, therefore, is induced to hope,
that he has not been unsuccessful in his endeavours to present
the Public with the only complete Report of a Proceeding
which, in interest and in magnitude, yields to nojte that ever oc-
cupied the attention of Parliament and of the Nation.
Vol. IV. containing the Proceedings from the opening of the
rescat Session to the 2d of April, will be published Ina few
Weeks.
13,- AU communications for this Work, if forwarded to Mr.
Wright, No. 5, Panton-square, er Mr. T. O. Hans-tril,
Peter-
borough-court, Fleet-street, will be carefully attended to ; but
as an early publication of the proceedings of each Session is ex-
tremely desirable, it Is respectfully requested that such commu-
nications may be forwarded with as little dela', as possible.
London : Printed for Baldwin, tiadock, and Joy ; J. Booker;
Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Bniwn; .1. M. Richardson;
Black, Kingsbury, Parhury, and Allen; J. Hatchard and Son;
J. Ridgway and Sims; F..Teffely and Son ; Rodwill and Martin ;
IL IL Evans; Budd and Calkin ; J. Booth; and T. O. Hansard.
_ .

Of whom may be bad,
1. The Parliamentary History of Ensland, from the earliest
Period to the Year 1803; in 38 Volumes.
2. The Parliamentary Debates, from the year 1803 to the Ac-
cession of his present 'Majesty;- in 41 Volumes.
3. Howell's Complete Collection of State Tri..lc; in 1-1 Vols.
4. Howell's Modern State Trials, Vol. I. to IX.

MEDICAL BOARD, NEAR BLACKFRIARS-ROAD.

CONCENTRATItD AT CHARLOTTE-HOUSE.
Sir FRANCIS C. DANIEL, Rm. M.D. Treasurer.

MESSRS. COOPER and Co. Members of the
Royal Colleges of LONDON, Enuesuann' and DUBLIN,
ranking high as Physicians and Surgeons in his Majesty's Ser-
vice, offer the result of forty years experience in different cli-
mates, °a those prevailing maladies, the bane of happiness and
domestic comfort.

Recent casts of infection are by them removed in two days.
Derangements of the Generative System, associated with a train
of the most agon:aing feelings, both bodily and mental, the con-
sequence of relaxation and debility, enfeebling the powers of
manhood, are completely restored with a success and skill—and
with that secrecy and honour which has received from their pa-
tients the most Battering testimonies of gratitude and attachment,
after having been improperly treated by persons unacquainted
with so important a branch oldie profession.
lklessrs. Coors& and Co. address themselves to both Sexes,
who are on the eve of Matrimony, requesting them to pause till
• they are assured of the state of their health, that no disappoint-
meta may disturb their future happiness, and which they pro-
mise to complete, if previously consulted.
• FISTULAS and Honours arc known, by the experience of hun-
dreds, to be effectually cured without cutting.
Messrs. Coorcs. and Co. are consulted daily at Charlotte
House, Great Charlotte-street, Blacktriars-road, where Letters
from the Country, containiug an Enclosure, and a correct State-
ment of their Case, will be innedt:.tely atter.ded to, and Advice
and Medicines sent to all parts of the World. •
• N.B. Mechanics have Advice Gratis every Evening, from
Six till Eight, and on Sunday Mornings until Twelve o'Clock.
Private fir;oms fur Consultation ; also l'rivate Rooms for
Females.
Messrs. Courts. and Co.'s Lectures on two Prevailing Com-
plaints, are Published by Harvey, 22 Blackfriars-road, price Is.

This day was published, price 21.
THE REPLY of' the PEOPLE to the LETTO
from the KING.
Printed for F. C. and J. Rivington, No. 62, St. Paul's Church-
yard ; and No. ; Waterloo-place, Pall-mall; and to be Unlit.
all Bookselkrs.

This day was published, price One Shilling,
THE SUBSTANCE OF THE SPEECH CIF
MICHAEL ANGELO TAYLOR, Esq. In the Hew
of Commons on Wednesday, the 30th of May, 1821. bßiele
DELAYS ih the HIGH COURT of CHANCERY of E G-
LAND, and In the APPELLANT JURISDICTION'of the
lIOUSE of LORDS.

Printed for T. Egerton, Bookseller to the Ordnance, Mili-
tary Library, Whitehall.

PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS.

HOUSE OF LORDS, JULY 2.

IMPORTANT QUESTION RELATIVE TO THE
' TRIAL BY JURY.
WOLFED APPELLANT.

The appellant in this case was one of the parties who, toge-
ther with Kinnear and others, was indicted and convicted in tier
Court of King's Bench about a year and a half ago for what was
at the time termed the Commercial Conspiracy. In the coorse
of the trial, it will tic remembered, the Court adjourned, and the
Jury, by the direction and permission of the Court, were allowed
in the interval to go at large. This separation of the Jury was
subsequently made the ground for an application for anew trial,
in support of which some attempt was made to shew that one of
the Jurymen had been tampered with, but it failed, the party
who had sworn the affidavit not being to be found as described;
the application, however, was refused, upon the ground that no
proof had been given that any injury had been sustained by the
party in consequence of the Jury having separated, thus leaving
the question of law, whether or no the Jury could legally be al-
lowed to separate before verdict given in a criminal case, wholly
untouched. A writ of error corm nobis was subsequently ob-
tained, and the case heard before the Judges, who delivered the
judgment sub silmnio, as it is termed, i. e. without assigning their
reasons, affirming the previous decision of the Court of King's
Bench, refusing the new trial. In this manner the case came oi
by writ of error in the House of Lords, on Monday, for the re-
versal of the whole proceedings upon the assumption of the
ille-
gality of the separation of the Jury.
After hearing the arguments of Counsel on both sides,
The LORD CHANCELLOR rose to deliver his opinion.
Before he proceeded to obseive upon the question, he conceived
it important to draw their Lordships attention to the form and
manner in which the case came before them. Their Lordships,
when acting judicially, were a Court of Appeal, not to make
laws, but to declare what the law really was, by reversing or con-
firming the judgment given in the Court below ; but from the
consideration he had been enabled to bestow, it did not appear
that any decision upon the question of law had, been delivered
by the Judges. His Lordship then took a view of the case, and
remarked upon the circumstance that the new trial had been re-
fused upon the ground that no injury had been sustained. With-
out meaning the slightest disrespect to the Learned Judges who
bad expressed this opinion, he must be permitted to differ from
their reasoning. An individual might tamper with a Juryman
without the fact being knewn to any one but themselves ; and,
as such tampering was in law a misdemeanour, both in the
Juryman and the person tampering with him, they would no
doubt take every precaution that the fact shn'uld not be dis-
closed. It was clear, therefore, that injury might have been
sustained without the possibility of knowing, much less of
proving, the fact ; and as it was also clear that this possible in-
jury arose out of the Jury's being permitted to separate, it was
of the highest importance that the opinion of the Judges on the
legality of the separation of the Jury, should have been made
known. The question of law had, however, been avoided alto-
gether, and their Lordships were left without any opinion what.;
ever of the Judger. Ile did not intend be tease observations
to cast the smallest reflection upon the Ju 'ages. The practice
of deciding upon the facts of the case, without touching the law
of the question, had been introduced tra Lord Mansfitld.
In the present case, through the adoption of this practice,
their Lordships were called upon, not to confirm or reverse a
judgment in law delivered in the Courts below; but to decide
the question of law themselves. This be considered was not
within the province' of that House as the High Court of Appeal,
and would amount to the making a law upon the subject. He
felt it, therefore, of the greatest importance, that the Judges
should be called upon to give their opinions, whether or not it
was legal to permit a Jury, sworn to try a cause, to separate be-
fore verdict given? and he wished to be understood that in
every case of appeal before that House, where the Judges had
omitted giving their opinions upon the law of the question in the
Court below, he should move that they be called Olson to deliver
them in that House. He did not mean to say that their Lordships
would be bound by the opinions of the Judges. It would be
the duty of their Lordships to give judgment. He had no hesi-
tation in declaring his feeling upon the subject. It was one
upon which he had bestowed great consideration, his attention
having been drawn to a similar question some years ago, when
he (the Lord Chancellor) had the misfortune to be engaged in
the trials of Messrs. Hardy, Horne Tooke, and Thelwall.—
In his inquiries upon that occasion, he could find but one in-
stance In which a Jury, after being charged, had been allowed
to go at large before verdict given. That was the case of Eliz.
Canning ; but in that instance the Jury separated with the con.
sent of both parties. Upon this case it was not thought proper
to act on the occasion of the trials to which he had alluded. He
did not mean to contend that cases might not occur in which
the Jury might legally separate; as the illness of one of the Jury-
men; but he was of opinion, unless some strong necessity could
be shewn, that such separation ought not to be allowed. The
appellant in this case he understood was in prison. Hc regret-
ted it; but his situation or conduct would not weigh in hill
judgment. He had now been forty-four years practising in the
law, in the higher branches, and Goo forbid that be should have
yet to learn, that every man was considered innecent in law until
he was legally found guilt v. The appellant complains that be had
not had the law justly administered in his case; and he (Lord
Eldon) felt that whatever ought be his situation, he was legally
and justly entitled to it. 111. Lordship concluded, by moving
that the twelve Judges be directed to attend that House on Fri-
day next, at twelve o'clock, which was ordered accordingly.