Star.
London, England, 1829-04-08 00:00:00

moil to
Urged 'froto
sod the s• 1
man Cattio

idolatress.
Stutete.of
• entered iota
widths tt,e
Os id flesh
the Bill if'
wear say, t
the Church
of that Act
to three Or
• certain cent
were stout
''thought tb.
peither mar
Right Bev.
the pi otessol
though eve,
• tbsciartd, in
'elision to b
tot aware ol
out referents
tiny Sveor si
by its comini
circumstance
lionssn Cult
the House of
Oath of Sup
pitted idolsti
all, they peel
per sous and
bars of the I
of the Nous
theist bhtul
But be. mei
• met Ws 'et
nee bis Neje
cell& on hi
was bound ti
Coronatioa,
by which tl
Catholic teli
the Roman I
of Commons
• their letimios
main after
• pretest tot at
said, and sai,
-Bishop, thst
Church, If

'►IM. he Torciu
•4kom his reg
T4Ctelr. II 11,1

Chula of

' Church. am
• .Christian Ca
Casholie CAL
ite uthre nal
would be su
found that th
gion inferior
testant Chugs
or its numb*
they would •
grelt binisfic
pioceedinp.s t
preached In 1
suck a panes%
. 11l it
now stood
supremacy of
tiwir Lin &Aril
—into all the
shavredthat tl
declared the
swat raeogaiss
He hippied tl
of him while
his oath swot
piesuair to al
who mould

prim ipla had
Salon ancftti

he would nevi
he would ma
act as houeml
could act fol
meat ancient
when be had
was aeitnowl,
whether it wj
that oath he
the exceHeno
• f Its uottri
putliy wouli
the menthess
de act acki
if h tint t
that tou.irre
served. that

jeets-..fie
lithey drnie.
r .ised attalm
beta* on and
their path, a
'.-.that aright
.1
'opinion.. ow
' etitef.r tit,"
intiffi. of *um
tbenr let 'Obi
Chit tibia thee'
al the i topic
'Cktucb wlll.l
und that th
subjrc.te vs o
ject?.., Ile at
both. Ina 1
potted the 14
tholics. beta
tattiest, of
wet ely were
*sent to be
.8;004 iib tut,
lie td, ey
in the ortindi
.feeltegv Lehi
•Vinkinal bn tl
•diefst and r
oild. TI;r1
•thr Roman
Ibbject to plat
odhce then
to be inn tabu
Set
HS retained I
open tivttf 0
intibu.
to be mewl
n
He could no
as it stood at
.Pass ble

• .

Po

mond to take. ft, while..theltonten Catholic was re-
tiefeaufroen those declara tt01.1.1 st again transubstantiation.
sod the &m
einent of. Mass, an 3 other pat ts,of the Ro.,
man• Catholic religion, which had hitherto been called
idolatress. It was surprising to hi n that ever since the
statoreof Charles the Second was passed, it had not
• miffed iota the consideration of any man whether it was
• "Min the power of Parliament to alter chi} oath.? But he
{nand he should get into a discussion on the principle of
the Bill if* he went any further into that topic; but he
sousesay, that when he recollected that every Bishop of
the Church of England,from the moment of the passing
of that 'Act to the day on which he spoke, or at least
to three or four days ago, had solemnly declared that
amain ceremonies of the Roman Catholics were, as they
were stated to be in the Declaration, idolatrous, he
-thought that the Roman Catholic religion itself was
;wither more nor Ist, thanidolatry. Bot there was a
Right Rev.. Prelate who held, the other evening, that
the pi otessors of that religion were not at all idolattol.lo,
though every Bishop of the Church of England had
. disclared, in this House, since the time of Charles H. that
ieligion to be id-lout:sus-Some of their Lordship. were
hOt aware of this consideration, when they talked with-
out reference to the principle of this Bill, and said that
redly ffve oy six Rom in Catholic Peers set old be admitted
by its coming into operation. They only looked at the
circumstance of there being a few or large number of
Roman Catholii Members admitted into that House or
the House of Commons. ' It had also been said that the
Oath of Supremany was a false declaration, if it iin,
pined idolatry to the'Roman Catholic religion. After
all, they seetned to see people merely as Protestant
risotto and Roman Catholic penbns, and the' Mem.
bees •eil the Legislature merely as Protestant Members
of the Houses of Liirds or 'Comm'ons, and Roman Ca*
.tholii Mensbests 4 the Houses of Lords or Commons.
But he, could not tell what the feelings of that man
. must be 'who could come into that House and
see his Majesty cn the Throne, and the Lord Chan-
cellor on his kneel, calling on his Majesty, as he
was bound to do, if he had not already done so at the
Coronation, to make and subscribe that Declaration,
by which the whole of the doctrines of the Roman
Catholic teligion.ate deviated to be idolatrous, while
the Roman Catholic Peers and Members of the House
of Commons were assembled with the others to hear
• their febeitta declared idolatrous; and so it would re.
main after.this Act was passed, if iccontioued inks
'present hum.. The Right Reverend Polite bad also
said, and said very truly, in the notion of a Protestant
-Bishop, that. we are all Members of the Christian
Church. If the Right Reverend Prelate would allow
'bill, he would ask
.respectfully, as he wished to do,
.fronthis repae.d.to the Right Reverend Prelate's cha-
racter, *holier the declaration that the Protestant,
Chtisct. uf England.. was' a branch of the Christian'
' Vhurcht and the members of it members of the
• ' .Chtistian Church, bad ever been made by the Itsernap •
Catholic Church ? If that was inserted into the oath to
'be LAM under this Bill by the Roman Catholic:, there
would be son ethiog admitted by them. Who ever
found that the proressors of the Roman Catholic reli-
gion inlreland admitted any such thing as that the Pro.
testant•Chttech is a branch of the Christian Church,
omits msn.bers mensbeisof the Christian Church? If
they would admit that into the oath, it would be every
great satisfaction to bins; 'but if they looked into tire
piociedings that had taken place. ,and doctrines' lately
preached In Ireland, every Noble Lord must see, that if
suefra ',estate' were admitted lee) the oath, the Roman
• Csltholicirwritild tan m*b admirettlekill. The oath, as it
now stood VI them, did not requite them to. admit the
'supremacy of the. Crown in matters ecclesiastical, and if
theit lath deltioww nuldleob imp every Act of Park .tent
—into all the law books, they would seethat everything
sheweckhat the principle ofConstionionai security,. It 'eh
declared the King's, supremacy' ins ecclesiastical albs,
was recognised as a principle of law by every authority.
He begged the favour of the House to think indulgently
of hire while he *aid again sad again, that, having on
his oath sworn that his Majesty had the supremacy in
thickiagelow id all matters ecclesiastical, be could not
ptesunte to admit others to office or seats in Parliament
who would not acknowledge the Kieg's supremacy :th at
principle bad been acknowledged *lace the days of our
Saxon ancestors in the reign of Edward theConfe,sor,and
he would never consent to see it abandoned: he could not,
he would not do it. Those who thought differently might
act as honestly as he was endeavouring w do; but he
could not fullest/ their course. In all our law's, hoot the
most ancient period of our history down to that mon eat
when be had the honour to address them, this principle
was acknowledged a part of she Crowta's rights; and
whether it was so or not, .he had sworn it was, and by
that oath he was bound. It was in vain thin men praised
the excellence of the Established Church and tie polity
'f al OOCtriii. X, and to argue that that excellence ano
Wiry would alone maintain it as it now blood. It
the meMbeis of the Protestant Church admit that they
de* net 'acknowledge the Supremacy of the Crown,
it is not the mantfeStation of that purity, nor
that tousistency of conduct, which they always pre.
moved, that wt,alJ insure them the respect of the sub-
jects-.. 150 would say the injured subjects of this country.
Ifthey denied to him that the voice of the country was
' r.isect against this measure more than it had ever bean
before on any other occasion, yet liesioseld feel that all
their pus sty at d excellence atm d not avert the effects
'oltliat Might
,be. et, iced iron, dare:foci ref religious
'opirribo.• hot take assay 'lsom Unir alivetearies the ap-
' Ipetite fir tithes and glebe lands, bedew, they are the
1 Meths of suppesikg an Established Church. He a ked
Abair Li rdsiirps uhesbet trey did not expect that t'om
111400041tete would coase in the n inds out he great mass
of the 1 little all that veneration for the L tahlihed
'Church which they had formerly possessed, when t ey
bond-this she Owe teemed this pu:ely as a political
sObjvt.t, vs milts did also as a purely telign.us sub.
jeer?.., Ile maintained 'that it ought to he regarded as
both. hi a political view of it, he. had Waco) sup-
ported the laws lor the exclusion • f the Roman Ca-
tholics, because he cunsideled them eesential, to the
'lidera of _civil and religious liberty; and not
snarly were they so declared in all the Acts of Podia.
1 sheet to be a I.erpsturl .aoggrity for the civil and tell.
4 .gioushb tries i f his tallow subjects. but also, he bes
liciest, 'fey bad the effect hithe.to of producing
in the 'lands it Englishmen those moral and religious
.feehogir ohich had distinguished them above all the
in Bite' bn the earth, and made thin the patients of
-Metal tied religious cenduct to the whole Protestant
%veld. This objection did not go so far as to exclude
•the Roman Catholics horn all effigies: for he did Mit
abject to place them in Nth political offices es would in
nether them tp seats in Parliament, and. entitle them
so be intrusted With the discharge of the deities of the
highest i flees in the executive departments of the State.l
Hee:mined himself tn that Went ; but this elfresethiew '
nen eet'ff 011 it to the KOMan Catholics With a Pit et-
'vowel. lo tli, opinion, a vast variety or offices otalibt
lobe tempted which wet* not included in the mocepti ns.
He could not give Ms consent, therefore, to this clause
as it stood at present. It was said that it was quite int-
sloneillie to describe the taken this enightUndee pettiness

to becossa,Cahinel ltilissiatim, and, thonfoto. du*ail
precautions of that character were 'useless. Hiehaew,
that Cabinets might be composed of individualts.paet DU •
whom were united in one opinion aid disagreed with .
the rest who were united in another-opinion. He knew
that very well by experience, and be had seen how most
wonderfully some Ministers were converted to opinions=
directly opposite to those they formerly held. Yet still he
thought that he could apply an exception even to such
persons esthete. He desiredto know whether, if these two
little words-0 Privy Cuonselloss," were made part of the
exceptions, they would not be efectoal ? He felt that
he should be acting improperly if he went through all
the clauses, which he could better consider and would
amply discuss on the third reading, when he should be
ready to offer s base arguments to their Lordships to
which he should beg their particular attention. He
knew• the zeal and ability of the Noble and Learned
Lord on the Woolsack, and he had no objection to con-
fess that something not very comfortable to him—he
meant a teasing gopt•—would induce him to escape
from the fatigue of entering more fully into the ques-
tion at that time; but it, on the third reading, he should
be able to attend, he would go much more largely
than he ought to do when merely dimming the clauses,
inasmuch as the observations would apply to other
clauses not before their Lordships. On the third read-
ing, he could state his objections at once to the prioci-
pie and to all the pacts of the Bill. There was one
point to which, before he concluded, he desired to call
the consideration of the Noble and Learned Lord on
' the Woolsack, and of all the rest of their Lord-

ships, including the Noble and Learned Lord (Plunkett)
on the Treasury Benches, and other Noble Lords, his
Noble Friends, as well as those Noble Lords who
v:ete opposed to him.. It related to James the Second.
—One of the circumstances which, in • the judgment
of the people of this country, had rendered him so
odious that he wAs obliged to leave it, was the
liberty he wok with the Charters: rHe (Lord Eldon)
wished to know whether it was the intention of this.

Bill that all the charters of Corporate Bodies, which the
corporator, were required, and had for years and years
been required, when admitted to corporate offices, to
take the oaths and declarations, to be repealed by this
13.111—he meant to ask, did their Lordships intend to
tear off the seals from these charters, and allow the can-

stitution of such Corporations to be violated? In future
clauses of the Bill there were many exceptions for some
C,lrporate Bldies, but there were many who would be
placed, by the Bill, in the strange situation he had de-
-1 scribed. The Noble and Learned Lord apologised, in
closing, for detaining the House; but he could not have
absolved his conscience if he had omitted the discharge
of his duty, nor could he conclude without putting the
question to those around him—how they and he could
get rid of the oaths they had already taken ?
•The Bishop of LLA-NDAFF protested stalest the argument
of the Noble sod Learned Lord, that because he (the Bishop of
Llandaff ) was willing to consent that Roman Catholics should dt
beside him in Parliament, he should be considered as ready to re-
linquish the principle of the oaths and declaration which be had
taken and subscribed--(Hear, from thg Earl of Eldon).—Perhaps
be had misunderstood the Noble and Learned Lord's argument ;
but, if not, it was one of the most extraordinary that bad ever
been advanced.
The Red of ELDON—What I said was this, that I had not
been able to end that Roman Catholics had admitted that the
Piosestant E.rablished Church was a branch of the Christian
Church; and 1 deduced from that a strong-reason why they should
not bet considered fit companions for the Right Reverend Prelate—
(Hier, and a laugh) —The Roman Catholics denied any supremacy
or autirority, civil, ecclesiastical, or spiritual, in the Sovereign of
these redoes • and I now sib the Right Reverend Prelate how I
cats retract that oath and declaration, which I have taken forty
time, and remain easy in his mind?—(Loud cheering.)
'The Bishop of LL A N DA FN said the Noble Lord had answered
Itia.oesa objection. The admission of Catholics was a question of
eipedieuey, and woe a question sit principle; and If it could be dome
safety, their Lordships most agree that the sootier it was dome the
better.

The Bishop of OXFORD 'fully concurred with the
Noble and Learned Lord that every idolator was guilty
of idolatry. He trusted he bad as much regard for the
solemnity of an oath as the Noble and Learned Lord,
and having sworn that the sacrifice of the mass and
tither Outs of worship of the Catholics wete idolatrous,
still held that opinion. There was, therefore, no dif•
Terence bassets himself and the Noble and Learned
Lord on the point it the word 66 idolatrous" was sub-
s hosted for 1. idolatry." He continued to think that the
invocation if saints was superstitious, but he should
have great hesitation in swearing that the sacrifice of
the was positive idolatry.. He should, therefoie,
wish the Noble and Leal ned Lord had gone a little
farther back, and shown him the place in histbry in
which it appealed that the Bishops of Charles 11. had
scrota that the sacrifice of the mass and the Catholic
religion itself was a system of idolauy. No such posi-
tion had ever been held by the Docti.rs of the &ca.
Iblished Church, who had consequently been defamed by
the Noble and Learned Lord's attributing to them
each doctrines. He wou d repeat, that he hati/ntser said
that the ineacation of saints and the sacrifice of the
mass were not• 66 idolatrous,"although he would say that
he had newer sworn that they consti.uted 66 idolatry:'
None but a tyto in logic could draw the conclusion that
the two words meant the same thing.
The Ea 1 of ELDON denied that he had himself eves
said that all P.l.ei v was idolatry. Now admitting, as
the Right Reverend Prelate wished to contend tor, that
the Catholic Church was a Christian Church, he should
ke to know, he repeated, whether the Roman Catho-
lics admitted that the members of the Right Reverend
Bench were members of a Christian Church?
Tie LORD' CHANCELLOR deprecated the coati
nued discussion a the pi iitcrple of the Bill before their
Lordships by the Noble and Learned Lord on that. cca..
,ion. Other opportunities would occur. .He therefore
t-tlught the Noble and Learned Lord ought to postiwsne
utt• it aril Wither discussion of toe principle of that me*.
He could not help expressing• his surprise that
the Noble and Learned Lord should declare his igno-
rance of ihoplace in which was to be found an admission
by the Catholics of Ireland that the members of the Pro-
testant Established Church were members of a Christina
Church. 'that admission was to be found in the Repoli
Of the evidence given by Dr. Doyle before a Committee
of their Lordships' House, which with their Lordships
leave he • would read—(Here the Noble and Learned
Lord read an extract from the evidence of Dr. Doyle,
in which he (Dr. D. yle) declared that he respected and
esteemed the Established Church of England more
than any ether Church in Europe). He was surprised,
therefore, that the Noble and Learned Lord should
tome down to that House, and so attempt to overbear
their .Lotriships. !Ask Noble and Learned Lord objected
tee the admission of Catholics to certain privileges be.
cruse they refused to admit the King's supre:nacy in
teClessastical matters; but the Noble anirLearned Lord
ottAht to recollect that. the Catholics already enjoyed
ahoy privileges on the same terms, and that the Bill
b.-fore their Lordships went to extend to provisions of
a law search had exir ed now nearly forty years.
The Earl of MOUNTCASHZL cootooded that the Noble and
/earned Lord (the Earl of Eldon) was quits correct to his
that** Catholics did set view the Protestant Church io the II&
ri a efuistiao Church. •
tiotd Tgergßont4.4t b vow forty years slate I was a trw
either. its 'legit or grammar; yet I beg leave to say that I bait

taunt nothing also atlikkonWat ma, to. ear that a supernitioas
• • • -• • -

' aegis Palesalatrstitioa.,ori. Iddareemtesinut Llear).. ,
TlM.Siskop of O,3LPfLI2 read an, extract from a spresla of.
Bishop Horsley. in which be stated that the unman e,tholics
rnotenadder themselves at liberty to break their engagements with
'heretics.
The. Karl of ELDON said thu he had been for Mewl-seven
years in that House, sad had not during that time been guilty of
attempting to bear down any persao. whimeer • btu, when. the
Noble and Leaned Lord talked of bearing dom. lye (Lord liklon)
should say that kg was not to he borne.dowabrtweasysticla persons
as the Noble and Learned Lord.
Loud PLUNKETT was anxious to svy a few words
upoo.the subject of the oath of supremacy: The mean.
Ing of that oath he contended to be, thyt " no foreign
Noce, Prelate, State, or Potentate had, or ought to
have, any pane, ecclesiastical or civil; within thi.
real ra;' in any sense, or to any roam which was incony
sistent with the just rights or prerogatives of the King
of this country. It was to this sense, And with, this qea-
lification, that the oath. was taro, as it was impossible
that any person could say that the oath was taken in.a
l•teral sense, in which it would be false. BA it had
been said that it was impossible. to separate the consi,
deration of thrteroporad fronathe ecclesiastical autho-
rity. Now, this subject had been for about thirty years
examined with the most sclutinising accuracy, for t..e
purpose of discovering any case in which.thit ecclesiasti-
cal poWer had operated upon temporal coat.eros, and
the only'instance to be discovered was, that patties oho.
were in this country married according to the Church,
of England were c ,nsidesed by the Pope as living ip a.
`Sate of sin ; but. the Pope never present in such a c.s.e
to deny the legality of diensarriar, or the rights of
the issue to inherit. The itt:s:nt oath he believed to
contain every thing necessary to maintain die security
of the. Stile and the prerogative of ae Crown.
The Earl of ROSSLYN recommended their Lord hips to con-
fine their attention to the clam.. before the House. and not to dis

cuss the general question at every sep rage of the all.
Lord LYTI'LETON sale, that the tote applied to
the Roman Catholics would Dot show them to be

idolatrous, epee admitting that the actt of worship
which they performed were idolatrous in tliens.selves.
He illustrated the ease by saying that if the Socinians
were to frame a test for the purpose of excluding the
Protestants of the Church of England front ParliAnseist,
they would probably select the subject of the divinity
of CHRIST. They (the members of the Church of Eng-
land) believed that Cartier was GOD, and riey aciAnd-
ingly worshipped him as such. But the Socinianal
who thought that CHRIST WAS a mere man, must look
upon the worship of him as idolatrous. In the same
way we contidered many acts OT the Roman Ca,holie•
to be idolatrous, whilst they were not gu.lty of any
idolatry in doing them, as they regardei the objects of
their venerntirwr in a very different. view.
The Earl of ELDON said, that be wished to say a few words
oaths point to which the Noble Lord (Plunkett) had referred. The
perties in such circumstances were placed by the spiritual censures
of
the Pope under the necessity of either violating their duties se
braving the chastisement of the Church of nooses
Lord PLUNKETT said, that if the parties thought the matures
of the Church of sufficient importance to induce them to forego
their temporal rights, they wereakt liberty to do so. But he (Lord
Plunkett) knew not one case in which this had happened, and be I
behaved that it was extremely unfrequent.
Lord TENTERDEN proposed an amendment, with a view to
Omit the adsniosion to Patliament of any person who may ban
bass elected before the passing of this Act.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said, tbat heshould oppose the
amendment, which was directed against a particular individual....
He thought it unworthy of the dignity of the House to co,.
descend, from its high station of legislation, to attack tb- rights of''
an individual.
Lord TENTEILDEN said it was strange, if there was any foun
dation for the high position which the Noble and Learned Lord
bad taken, that in the lkil there occurred the following wind.--
" Any Roman Catholic who shall after the passing of this Act."
The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that he did not agree with
his Moistened Learned Friend in thinking, that without his amend-
ment the individual in question could take his seat in the Hoeft
of Commons.
Lewd PLUNKETT saki that, although the declaration against
transubstantiation was omitted, the Ostia of Supremacy was re-
tained.. It was true that Roman Cath.ilies had takeu the atth of
Supremacy for several years alter the accession of fasten Elia thefts,
but it was equally true that nu Roman Carbolic bast taken it for the
last 150 years, or would take it now.
Lord HOLLAND said that the Act (25 Charles the Second)
which was to be repealed by this Act had been retro.pective, and
be therefore saw no reason why the present Act should not tie .u.
Lord TENTERDEN then withdrew his amendment; after
which the original question was put, when the House divided—
Poe the original clause . . 135
Against it .
• ;lb • lid
Majority . . --73

OD our readmission, which was not for a considerable time after
their Lordships had resented the iliscussn.n, it was usideratuod
that the House was engaged in disca.sing the stconii clause.
The Earl of NOUN TCASHEL proposed an Antendmtnt, the
object of which was to introduce this, words into the Declaration,
" not being in Holy Orders . r hlonanic Orders of the Church ut
Rome."
The Rol of ROSELYN observed, that would have the effect
of excluding any Noble Peer who happened. before his accession
to the Peerage, to have taken Orders in the Church of Rome.
He could conceive no object in proposing amendments oaf that na-
ture except purely for the purposes of interruption.
The Duke of W ELLIN ciToN .a.d, that the effect of that de-
rivation so altered by the proposed amendment of the Noble Earl
would be to exclude Noble Peers :rum that Douse which, after
the passing of the Bill, would become their tight. It would be
drawing an invidious distinction between Prute.tants and Ituman
Catholics to say that no person, being a Bishop or Cardinal of that
Church. should have a seat in Parliament.
Lord It EDESDA LE ob.erved, that it was well known that the
Bishops of the Church of Rolm took an oath which totally incapa-
citated them from afterwards taking the oath of allegiance.
The Marquis of LONDONDERRY objected to the Lingtaage
of the Noble Lord in attributing to the Nimble Earl who bad pro-
posed the amendment an intention of nuking that proposition with
the view of creating delay. It was rather hard th t a Noble Lord
connected with Ireland should be so treated tor proposing what
appeared to him an expedient amendment.
Lord PLUNKETT said, the amendment was against all prin.
ciple ; • it sought to deprive hereditary Peer. of their hereditary
rights: A provision was nude against persons in holy ordera of the
Catholic Church sitting inn the other House. for Protestants se
circumstanced could not sit there. A Nola', Earl who often spoke
upon that question, and who they heard with much pleasure, was
in holy orders of the Protestant Church, and not 'neap:lc:wed by
that circumstance from sitting and voting. As they were about.
putting Roman Catholics and Protestants then on the emir looting,
be should object to the amendment of the Noble Earl, as tending is
defeat the great purposes of the measure generally.
The Earl of HADDINGTON thought the discussion of the
present proposition was sheer toes of time, for if the R. man Ca-
tholic Bishop, by reason of the first oath, was incapacitated from
making the declaration, it was obvious that he cooled not entre into
the House at all.
After a few words from the Earl of MOOVICASWIL.
The Duke of RICHMOND said he hoped the Noble Earl
would net presevere In pressing his amendment, for that would put
him (the Duke of Richmond) to the necessity of doing that which
be should not like namely, dividing with his Majesty's hlinisters.
—Amendment wit/mine o.
The Earl of FALMOUTH was extremely anxious that some
`Nations should be fixed to the number of Roman Catholic Re-
regentatives sitting in Parliament. Though be should be sorry
Mesa so many as one hundred, yet be thought it better that that
member should be fixed than that there should be no limit what-
ever; end he, therefore, thought that he should not discharge his
duty if he did not endeavour to get the antendtnent which he held
in his hand made a past of the Rill; it was to that effect that Ro-
man Catholics should only be eligible to sit for places in Ireland.
• Lord ELLENBOROUGH said, the effect of the Noble Earl's
Amendment was to prevent any persons being elected fur counties,
cities, and boroughs in Ireland--(A laugh).
The Karla FALMOUTtIItio, in England. It was contended
that some necessity or expediency existed with respect to Ireland;
the same was not inthted on with respect to England. .
• The Duke of WELLINGTON—They bid all alon; reeemiel
upon the principle that it was elpediensto Sdniit,Rontan Catholics
Into Parliament.. That principle bad been adopted by the House in
agreeing to the Second reading, and be sew se ground for the die'
tined= proposed to be 'established b the • Mont of the
jdoble Ear & Why sboolit Ronian. bedtated front
sitting; fog. motto; and cane tit *tibia and ileothelol Ni-wby

' •-; .046.

should the number nee hundred be Seed ern? and why •hould It
.he assumed. that at the Representathea lvoirld Main
r.4thwicit Ile sate Kura) Noble Lords pear him n hu, he bad
no douhr‘yrould vtry much regret to see the r4otrstaiite excluded
'rem the representation of lteland ; he, for eine, would regret It
exceedingly. There could he no grounds for antivpatiug ail such
result. and the amendment th: n before the Commute would have
the effect of creating mi•chievous distinctionswithout attaining the
object in view.
The F.arl of FA L MOUT! —Tbe lits!de Duke quite mjsiinder.
stood him; be was far frusa wishing fur 100 members of the l'a-
tbelicpenua4ota.

A cotiveration then mimed between the Earls of CASKAIMIII
and MksLin% the, Duke of WitLuxury:a, the Marquis of Lauseown,
and bad Kamm. The amendment was negatived.
The Earl of WINCH ILSRA propmed that lt•unt.in Catholics
should not be required to declare that they renounced the do,:tristo
tbat l'rinces might be deposed. Whatever might base been the
caw formerly, be was persuaded that a long time pea no snub
opinions were entertained. ,
After a few observations from the Earl of lltiontwortat, the
Loan Cllll/111CeL6/11, Lord RILDVIDALt, Lord TENTLIMEN, and Lord
Alloy PICA str

Lurd 'UN DER DR.N proposed that the 'Para, " and n3t. a"
should br inserted after the word " kyon the gr nand
that privilytes ratendrd only to the House. 01 Par:la:ll4u, aisJ ~..1
to offices in•Corporati.bus, to which it was quire as otcessiry that
tbr provision. sat the hill should rstend as to the esti: .nieut.

'Ube WU/ CIIANCKLLOK said, that if elte NW)lc lord
would read the whole of the clAux.e, be would &id tb.tt tbe word
privilege extended to perouts tilting offices out of the P..ilistneot
as well a' jo.

Lord TICNDKRDEN said, that he had devoted many hours to
the perusal.of the WI. and had p id much attentian to it. hut he
confessed he could not read it as the Sold,: Lord bad ju•t 'card.
At all events, it it was the intention of Government that the pro-
viauns of the Bill should extend to the person. he had mentioned,
there could be no harm at least in addieig the words he proposed.
After some other observations front several Noble Lords the
question was put spots the amendment, and negatived.
Two whet clauses were aiterwards read and agreed to.
Lord K YON then moved t list the I louse do adjourn.
Earl GltliY thought it would be better that the Hluse should
gicou at least as long ea there shuukl be no opposition to any of the

Lord KE YON', however, persisted in bis motion; and :.ht► a
few•nhser•.atioos from several other Noble Lord., the queetion 11141
the House do) Adjourn was put, sod a divisiusi took plate, when the
stuusluers were— _ _ .

Commit. 14; Not Content. 113: Nlajorit y. 99.
Lord IZOLLE, however, chaired. his detcrimsiatiou to divide
the House every Gee minutes upon the (pet:shill ; iu consequence of
which
The Duke of WELLINGTON proposed tbat the Muse should
adjourn until hve o'clock to-morrow (ttos day)
The Nob's Duke's proposition was agreed to. and the House
ii)unieJ at HALI•PAST On. O'CLUCE.
HOUSE OF CONINIONS.
Comm.! was beard and witnesses were examined upon Ilaynes's
Divorce Ils

Mr. GRATTAN presented Petitions from several parishes is
Ireland, against the Burying Act, and the Subletting and Veur,
Acts. Plea a Petition trout the Bishop and Secular t:krgy of the
Diocese of Ferns, and from Galway, in,favour of Mouoric Goole
tutionc—Oidered to be printed.
Mr. MILL moved lot a Return of all Coals brought into Los•
don, not sea coal. in the yawn 1886 111,47, and 11h18.—Orsiere.i.
Mr. LI:NNAILD forearmed a Petition front the B.lk tianutao.
turns of Halstead, in the county of hoes, cumplai ll i ll g of ,actress,
and attributing the state of their trade to the alteratioa 01 the dories.
Mr. LESTER. thought the duty ought to lit taken ur. ;gig
tbsowo silk, and.a bounty given upon the home articie.
Mr. Il UM K thought the petitioners were altogether mistaken ist
attribeting the causes of their distress to free trade.
Mr. D. W. HARVEY said be wished the Hun. Nleniher foe
Aberdeen would afford these unfortunate petitioners some more
valuable relief than his sympathy. In his opinion the distress of
their trade was clearly made out to be created by the inundation of
foreign wrought silk., which had followed the adoption of the.
Irinctpleaof free trade.
Sir G. PHILLIPS contended that the alteration of the laws
had nut midmost the present depression in the trade.
Mr. UIRIGIIC said that the various opinions entertained upon
this question, proved the nacewity of apkuttuseg a Commuter to
inquire into its real merits.
Air. DARIN deprecated discussion now, is a day was •et apart
for the fun consideration to the subject.
Mr. EYLER said that all practical men attributed the evil to
the admission of foreign manuLctures.
Mr. AX W LLL conteuded that a Committer alight to h. ap.
pointed, for whatever might be the feelings within thew w.I
was wee that throighout the country there was now . general he.
lad that no advautage coulJ be expect:4 from the 'pica' which
had lately been introduced.
Sir G PHILLIPS explairued, and the petition was o:derel to
be printed.
Mr. MAXWELL presented a P. titian from cert.io inhabi-anti
of Paisley, expressing their satisfaction at the Uttuse b sang car.
ried a measure for re:Dowell all religious disiincriutis.—Ois!eied to
lie on tla: table.—Also a Petition sivied by $:10 per.on4 eitg.g.4
in the Silk Trade at Paisl.y, praying fur an .It. tarots 'A tits pre•
sent Silk lawc—Ordered io Le printed
RUYAL CANAL COUPANY.

Lord TULLAMOItE hol iing a P croon in his h•ird,
said—Sir, I hold in my 411 a P t tons from
Directors of the Irish Royal Canal Comp ny, cow.
g of a grievons 'tiny inflicted or, their veiled
tights. 1 feel it my euty, Sir, to call the attention of
.he House puticularly to this Petnion, as toe soling
mattes of complaint involves great public p-i dl les;
and I c in assure the House I w ill not a rap ss. on their
anent on longer than 1 terl is ab.oltuety necessary in
justice to th.: Petitioners, who have done .I.e t..e II .ontre
to entrust me faith their Petiti..n. S:r, the P..it o..ers
have. not presumed to 4,,proich your llnnon.,.b.ell..use
till they had b,:en flethed justice fr-nr the cont. ttribu-
nals to which they have appealed; and under the arty
peculiar cirrum tas.ces i which they wove i•lac• if, t i.,
Sir, is the mai), uutithial from whiffs they c iinee to
fioficitacction flour the injury about to be intl-rod on
their tights and properties. Sir, there exist tr. I e• ind
two canals, namely, the G. and aod the It .; Ag d .i.o t
un'ortiotately f r the inte.e is of h• tit, they we're eke'
•Lized in two p .rallel hoe., emoting for 43 ve
miles (ions Dubin', at a .I.st•nee not txceedi, X stn milts
.torn ei.h Thetoriseq rences of t fatal -i.aitake
have been most ruinous, apJ the Royal Canal kOt
afford a return nt, 1 per cent. on the ca,litakt sionded.
At this point the canals diverge to the estent•ol 1?
mites (soil each other, and the cornplaint•cnorairied ed.
this Pelition us, that the Govrinment have ,ancliil+4 a
grail of ; üblic money for making an
the Grand Canal in the ilifeeti. n of the a , which
will bring the two canals a right isr rani u.ii.a if
each utter. This rite s on by Li ott-t.r4 th thet are
advised.ia the tr.! Ireland;
and as, by the peiulial: iticuarslanCes I+l e case, they
sir debarred Irons appeal. to other tribunals, ato.l hero
the coercion' eiteicibed by Gove nrre ever their funcs
they cannot seek rot a ptivateCommit ee, the C uric
lett them in defence of their pro' err es is to make this
appeal to the justice of Pat liisazent. , Sir, at the time of
the dissolulion of Lord Liserpot.l's Administration. the
Director. of the Grar.d Causal Company. and Alf. Lam-
bert, the proprietor of .the town of K•lbeggass, appiied
to the Lord Lieutenant for an advance of money until
the Consolidated Fund, for making arrl•Esbrairch front
the Gs and Canal to the town of K.lbeggan, I g t *inti-
mation oh the application, and addiessed.a letter in cone
siquence to Lord AlelbOarne, the then Secietary
Ireland, stating, amongst other grounds of. orjection,
that the lifits sec. of the 40th Geo. 111. had not lion
complied with, which enacts "tli.t inlaid shall be given
.out • f any public moi.ey, fcr completing. &c. Sic.. any
canal, unless the scheme be first laid before' the Ditec.
tors of Inland Navigation," &c. &c. After some cor-
respondence, it- was determined to submit the plan to
the Boasd of Inland Navigation, who, after a-tninute
inquiry on oath into all the circunes ance...re, ()fled
44 that this olf-brancli would be injurious to nested and
long-established rights, and that they ..cocaequently
could not sanctiou it." • The measure seas.!tn 'conse-
quence abandoned, and great was the' surprise if t. e
Royal Canal Company, itt the summer of 11128, to d.o.-

been renewed
wrote to the N •ble Secretary, and a lengthened cm•
respondence took place between us—and I beg to ac-
knowledge the great courtesy and attention my com-
• munications met with from the Noble Lord; but great
was our consternation to find that Government were
determined to issue the money, in spite of an Act of
Parliament made for the protection of the rival canals,
the 40th George II I. section 26, which expressly states,
" That no off-branch shall be authorised by the said
Directors , which shall in:erfere with, of approach
towards," ate. &c. either canal. From this startlinj
delesminatiois the' Royal Canal wished to appeal to the
Lord Lieutenant in Connell, but informed that no
appeal lay unless the Directors of Inland Navigation
bad 'proved, and the Lord Lieutenant negatived—
That then a i appeal would lie against the Lord Lieu-
tenant, bur as the Directors had negatived the measure,
no appeal would be received. Their next object was to
apply to this House for a Committee. but their funds
are under the content)! of Government, and no expend:-
lure can be made without the sanction of G'vesnmrot,
who naturally would not enable them to appeal against
eir own act... This.then, Sir, -is the only, course left.
open for them to pursue, sod the Petitioners Pei
coilhdeot of receiving that justice front you which
his b•en denied them brothers. ' t am aware that
tl#: Noble Lord will attempt to justify the conduct
of the Government by saying he acted upon more recent
Acts of Parliament, and that this one is virtually re-
pealed ; bat, Sir, this fact I deny ; becauseihe 40 h
(icinge.lll. was enactedlor the protection of the two
rival canal. from mutual encroachments, as well as for
the issue of a certain sum fit their extension. -On the
espenditure of that sum other Acts were necessary, to
enable Government to i.sue farther sums; but this Act
ts. as ',eves repealed ; and sect. 10 enact., that " no aid be
given out of any puhl.c money." This, Sir, is the injury of
which the Royal Canal Company complain, and the
snore so because this lavish expenditure of publ c money
will afford no benefit to the public; a few private indi.
viduals Will alone be gainers by it; and it the House
make an inquiry into the merits of the ease, they_ will
11 4 that the security taken by the Commissioners for
the issue of public money is insufficient, and that the
capital advanced by Government cannot be repaid. The
village of Krlbeggan has no trade, no commerce, and is
situated almost in the centre of a district bounded on
the north by the Royal 'Canal, and on the west by the
river Shannon navigation, tied on the south and east by
the Grand Canal. It is only five miles distant from
the town of Tullainore, the largest inland man ket
town ia Ireland, which is situated on the Grand Canal,
and has the best corn market, with the greatest f
ties for trade possible. No public ;ood can proceed
from it—the money will be lost. Sir. it is art the Royal
Canal Company alone who complain—it •is the public
generally, who on all sides exclaim against this sacrifice
of the interests of the many—this welts' expenditUre for
the ben,.fit of the few. Thies-, Sir, ate theagrounds
"Inch have urged the Petitioners to seek justice from
this House, anal that Parliament-Will support her own
enactments. Lhase a:tempted to express the feelings
of the Petitioners, a-d I must espies my anxious hope
than the Government may take this Petition into the r
seta' us geirisidei adon ; if not, I ;shall feel it my duty, on
a future day, to give notice of a motion founded on the
prayer. I wore that rh- Petition be now brought lir. • •
Lord L. GO W Eft defended the grant. as being useful aud tisk
in principle. ' •
Cofenel LIF.R NATI') supported the petitiqn.
After a few words Crum Lord Tuse.anosa, the Petition was
ordered to he primed..
Lord Cl.lb.d IsNTSpresented Petitions frerotwo parishes in the
county of Leitrim, against the Sub-lettillAct.—Laid on the table.
Mr. fl UAI E moved fur returns of the number of Writers ma
cadets sent out to India for the last three year, is cciatineatitin of
former mum.. • •

Mao fur the 'Dumber of Fr.emen in each Corporate TOWD in
Ireland, distinguishing the residents from the non residents. -
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said be did sot
set tow it was possible fur the returns to be made.
returus were ordered. after a few reisarkefross Mr. Hues,
Mr. Basseso.llr. Doissavr, Mr. Rosh lad Mr. PAGE.
Lord L. GOWER gave bodes that be should move on Friday
those Miscellaneous Estimates which were to boreferfed to a Se-.
' lect Commit's,.
Mr. BAKING presented a Petition from WWII persons eta.
gaged In the Silk Trade in the Metropolis and its vicinity, relating
to the Silk Laws.—Ordeted to be printed.
Mr. JEPIISON presented a Petition from the Ronsin Catholics
of-two parishes in the county of Cork, and one hint Galway, In
favour or the Catholic
Mr. STEWART presented similar Petitions from two places
is Banffshire.
Mr. P. COURTENAY presented Copies of Communications
received from Ms Majesty's Foreign Consuh abroad, upon the
subject of Corn—Ordered to be printed.

CHARING CllOll5 triesovantors.
Mr. D. W. HARVEY moved for further details of the expen-
diture of the money granted for the Charing cross Improvements.
The lion. Member complained that the expenditure exceeded the
original estimate by above 200.0001. and that pearly that *mount
was so applied a. net to be productive of any return, being cc/notated
by alluwahres to architect-, surveyors, and fur the ckarges of Soh-.
emus and nth. rs. His object was to obtain an account of these li
items. The lion. Member moved for Returns embracing the
&tome objects.
Mr. WA II RD RTON secomkd the motion.
. Lord LOWTHER said that the only part of the peoperty
which had been disposed of since be came to his .dice bad been
distosed of upon the principle which ought always to govern the
di-pqsal of Crown property, that of public competition. If the
Honosnable Geutlentau would go with him quktly into an exami-
mafiosi of the papers in his office' he was eaufsdent he would be
perfectly satisfied without preising for these Returns.
Mr. U. BARCLAY said,thse what had fallen from the Noble.
Lod must be sack/aeons He suggested that the Noble Lord
would afford a great public coovenience if be would make the Bud
Cage Walk a public road. which might be done with very little
r4eose.
Mr. HUNG uld, that the coarse which bad been taken by the
Noble Lard was moat satisfactory. but he had beard of abuses in
the disposing et intesests under this Act, which the Noble Lund
would got sanction.

After a few observations from Mr. R. Cocanture,-11r. Banns.
the CIIANCILLOS Of the Excitutota. Mr. Heaver, and Alf.
the patios was withdrawn.
Lord F. L. GOWER said, that in moving that the lath Report
of ebb Consmistionen of Inquiry into the rout of Admit. ty in
Ireland be referred to a Select Committee, it would be uunecessaty
for him to occupy more gum a very short time tbeattention of the
House. It appeared by the Report of the Commissioner, that the
present Judge of the Admiralty Court in Ireland had held that
station since the year 1790, and he bad not executed the Act since
betil. It appeared also that that high judlei.l tracer (Sir J. Bar.
storm') was charged with having appropriated vatious' sums of
money of the Court to his own use. Such serious charges, it was
quite evident, could not be paced over without inquiry. An in.
castigation wu due both to the public and to the judicial officer
whose conduct was Impugned. Besides the Report, it would be
necessary so refer some *diet documents to the Committee, and
therefore be should move that a Select Committee be appointed to,
inquire into the likh Report of thi Commissioners of Inquiry into
the High Court of Admiralty In Ireland, area also into the Memo-
Hal of Sir Jousts Barrington, Judge of the said Court, and to report
their opinion and remarks thereon to the House.
The motion was agreed to, and a Select Committee appointed.
Mr. WAII BU RTON moved that a Select Commit tee be ap-
Poirsted to consider and give effect to the recommendations in the
Annuity Report of the leis &islets. •
Thearetiets was agreed to, and a Select Committee appointtd.
kw A. °RAVI brought up the Report of the Conunittee •of
wilit AIWA was read and suited to,
' •

.

. H..•.. 1•.. •

LON DON.

3t.

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 8, 1829 '
PRICE OF STOCKS AT FOUR O'CLOCK: •
Bank Stock Ink ea die India Bonds st
S par Cent.lied. 664 7ez dir South Sea Stock 964
3 per Ct. Con& 1171 Lim Backe+ Bilb y 9 •li
34 per Cent. 1418. 95k ez die .1500 Ditto 59 II
34 per Cent. Red. 95k ez div JIM and .12u0 MB°. 10 '52
4 per Ct. New, 104 i if Commercial
4 per Cant. 1826,103# k ex die Bank for Acet.
lung Aim. India for Acct.
India Stock Shut Consols fur Acct 874
FORRION FUNDS, TWO O'CLOCK.
Brazilian lids. 5 pLt. 521 34 4 Do. Ac. 20i
Do. Acct. 52 14 24 434 1 3 Pross.Bonds,s pet 102
Colombian IN., 6 per Ct. • Russ. lids. 1622, 5 p Ct. 96
Do.Bonds,l 424, 144 • Do.'Acct. 96k
Do Arm. 144 Spanish Ms 5 p .
Duiiah 11.1 s. 5 pCt. Do 530, 94
Do Acre 654 Fr. Renter, 3 p Ct. 011 f
creek NO 6251 5 pCt. 144 Exchange, 251 404
Mez.1145,11125,1p Ct. I Do. Acct.
BRITISH AND FOREIGN SNARES, TWO
-1

Brazilian -

Ditto National
General Mining Asio
United Mexican

/MAIL ram.
ss 20
25
20
. 40 ll2b

SS 00 .
St Si

be .

The Roman Catholic Relief B►ll was consrdesed in
Committee last night in the House of Lords. A very
Warm and interesting discussion took place on several
of the clauses. and various amendments were suggested
and negatived; and at half past one o'clock this morn•
ing the House adjourned the further consideration of
the remaining clauses till this afternoon.
The opponents of the Bill cannot wring from the Go•
vernment any modifications of the Bill as it, now
stands, and it is evident that it will pass the Lords
without an addition,' security fur the Established
Church. whose downfal we fear may be predicted from
the day the Royal Assent is given to this measure. In-
dications of ho►tility to the Church are already apparent
in the highest quaiter►; and the total absence of Chris-
tian feeling in some instance-, shoos that the spirit of
religion is wanting. as much as z7al.for the main termer
of its establi•htuent'.

The Paris Papers of Sund.i), and the Gazdiede Frame
dated Monday, reached us ye.ter day. They announce
that the choice of the Sacred College bad devolved on
Cardinal CArrhat.toaft.. who ascends the Pontifical
Throne by the name of Pius VIII. His Holiness
is sixty-eight years of age, and has ben a Member
of the Sacred College since 1816. It was he who re-
plied to the address of Viscount CHATZAUBRIAND, and
was said to, have acquitted himself on that occasion with
great credit.
Trine Pipers contain no p-litical hews, but reports
are very prevalent that M. de CHATEALIKIAND is
about to succeed M. de FiaIIOWNAS as Minister for
Foreign Affairs.,

• We received this morning German Pacers to the 2J
inst. their contents continue to be void of importance.
The following is the ..nly %t wig *mai extracting:

ANCONA, klaacr 14.

The ponder' horizon seems to become more sloe*, and the
good not to be fulfilled which accompanied the presentation of the
last declaration of the Powers to the Porte. Not only is the war
with Russia continued, but letters from Constantinople, said to
have been received at Corfu, are reported to speak of the prisaibi-
lky oft breach with France, bscause hostilities are continued on
the Greek repetition, almost in sight of the French troops so that
the agreement of the lati of November is not, observed, and the
Porte begins to consider the French expedition not at exedinlettly
intended fur the protection of the Mores, but at a direct hostile
proceeding towards itself. Letters from Corfu add, that It is en-
tirely owing to the Raleigh Governmeut if the Porte does not suffer
itself to be carried away by the first inipressien that this proceeding
makes on it. Sir Frederick Adam is particularly praised for
having aired his infitseoce with the Turkish Commanders is Livadia
and Albania, and having, through their meaus,withheld the Sultan
from any precipitate step, which would have placed both him and
the French Ministry in a very critical situation. The interview of
the Lord Uigb Commisseuner with the present Grand Vizier ex-
cites new apprehensions, because various reports are in circulation
which aunqunce a change in the sentiments of the Porte, and
even connect be removal of Redschid Pae.ha with it, who, not.
withstanding his military character, is considered very mild,
and a friend of peace, and who might probably adopt a more
moderate system in the affairs of Greece than would cot-
respond with the sentiments of the Sultan. The blockade
of Candle, and the interruption by Russian ships of the communi-
cation between Alexandria and the Asiatic coast, are new causes of
complaint to the Porte, which sees in these measures a continuance
of the hostile partiality of France in favour of the Greek insurrec-
tion, sad thinks that without the occupation of the Muria by
French troops, no other Power would have ventured to act lade.
pendetly of the inhere at a time when the Porte continually bears
of unanimity. It seems to respect that a particular noderstandhig
subsists between France and Russia in order to force caseations
from the Divan which it cannot voluntarily assent to; and hence
it infers that, in Fah* of fact, France is as mach at war with it as
Russia. „It is allinuadthin the Porte, acting on these prvssingdosso
is taking measures tsildeb indicate dangerous intentions, and the
Foley erlartura as thdlika agents will leave nothing nettled

to prevent the Ilantes.of War from sireatliog any farther. But the
liateri.freas Curfu of which vie have spoken, express a fear that
the irritation which has been suited will case all moderation to
be throws aside, and that the Porte, owe sad more entangled by
cooholleatesl circumstances, will in the sod resort to extreme mes-
. sures, without regarding the suggestions of prudence.
MARCY, 27.-L:Metalliqoes, 97 7.16;. Bank Shares,
1,09.5.--Algeweim Sawn. April I.
• CITY. TwaLva o'CLocs.

No ham several Bravais of Alp letters. but no foreign malls
this morning, consequently we are void of Information from the
Continent.
Consols opened this morning at $7l for the Account, and *ma-
dam at the same price, with no business doing at present.
The Foreign market is in the same state of inactivky, and the
prices are the ante as yesterday.
Tire Isabella Brazilian frigate is arrived at Falmouth—this is the
frigate which was said to be en her way to carry back the young
Queen of PortugaL
CITY. HALF-PAST ONR O'CLOCK.
Letters have been received by the Isabella, Brazilian frigate,
front Biolaneiro, of the 11th of February. by which we under-
stand that a Nobleman of great distinction is on board the above
frigate, who Is come to emaciate and to settle the differences be-
tween Portugal and the Brills : he brings over with him a large
quantity of money. We also understand that accounts base been
received, by the above conveyance, from the Imperial Brazilian
Mining Comply. by which it is said that the mines have pro-
duced forty pounds weight of gold in one day. In consequence of
which, tie Imperial Bream Mining Shares have got up in the
markst,this morning, 210 per share.
Consols sdul remain at e7i for the Account. and 87j MI fur
May, with little or nothing doing.

Last night one of-the King's messengers was sent off
rrom the Foreign °dice, with dispatches for Lo►d Herrmann'',
our Minister at St. Pectnburgh. _ _ _

•
Dispatches Stele this day received at the Col-'nial
(pee, from Sir ;Anwar Cots, Governor at the Cape of Good
Hupe. dated 26th of February.
Dispatches sere also 'revived at the Colonial Office
from Barbadoes and Newfotiodtmd.'

Viscount ITABAYANA, the Brazilian Mini•ter. had a
long interview whit Lord Assam''., at the Foreign Mice. tirb
forenoon.

Dilt,o tk 1 :
•
Airy, • „Itr,igt
t . apptentment of Lord Anglesey as
1141!t
V -,i'ete
) • • . - . -land the N +le Lord the, present
_4- ~.. Lk-7, : and, the subject had been agai;
- . '' 1. ;,-pt, . tied on with so much sectesy that 0 e
.!
'issue of money was, I believe, actually
signed, before it transpired that the application bad
been renewed for an issue of money.. I immediately