Star.
London, England, 1827-12-18 00:00:00

TUESDAY EVEN

PRIVATE EDUCATION.
AVACANCY is now Open in she Family of
tied Clergyman, the number of whom Pupils Is limited
Six, bit Residence Twelve Miles from London; he can off,r
moat satisfactory References to Noblemen and Gentlemen
Sass have been under his care.
Letters to ►e addressed to the Re.. Je C. C. Mr. Rodwell',
Bookseller, 46, New .Band-street, London.

RUBSCRIPTION FOR A MONUM EN
THE MEMORY OF MR.CANN,
Amount of Subscriptions already advertised . ,67,480
Subscriptions since received :
At Messrs. Chibrand Co.'s.
The Rev. H. H. Haber .
Major Rudd

. £lO
• . . . 1
At Messrs. Coons and Co.'a.
Joseph I.llledale. Esq.
Rey. Dr. John Keate !
Mr. B. R. Hayden. •
Lord Bloomfield
Earl of Clare
Mr A. 8. Hammond, Rat.
Hem sad Rey. H. Howard
At Years.
of niati4l.4
lias ;,*..11"74 1811
eng Wok Sq.
I,.lBr!.lsarrs, fie; • .
Thhtkthwayte, Esq.
Vernon Smith, Esq. .
John Carroll, Esq.
Duke of Portland
Duchess ofTurtland . .
Honourable G. M. Fortemus .
Captain J. R. Broadhead
Rev. R. Turner .
W. 'Turner, Req. . . 10
At Messrs. Hamotersley's.
Rev. Archdeacon Pam
Right lion. Wilmot. Horton
At Messrs. 'ferries and Cs's.
J. F. Kennedy, Esq. M.P.
Colonel Barnett

. . 10
. . 10
. 0 10
. 95 '
. 2.1
. 10

. s

. 11

. 20
. 200
. 100

. 40 10

II
• 41

. 10 ll
. 5 1

At Messrs. Hoare's.
T. B. Leonard. Esq. M.P. .
At Messrs. Gosling and Co.'s.
Godfrey Sykes, Esq.
. .
At Messrs. Smith, Payne, and Smith's.
G. G. M. Larpent, Esq.
Joite Eng.
*Mania Tboke, Esq.
J. T. Gordon, Esq.
Rev. Thomas Crompton

. 10 11

. 21
. 10
. 20

Names of Sobscribers residing in and near Birmingham
Richard Spooner, Esq. . . . .C 5 -
W. C. Rowell, Esq. Moseley, Worcestershire
Rev. R. Kennedy . . 3
E. T. Moore, Merchant . •
J. Parkes. Solicitor •
. .
G. Nichol* Esq. .
F. Finch, Esq. Wow Bromwich .
Rev. T. M. MlPDonsell
& Hoot, Esq. Haedswol-th
T. faith, Esq. lislghaston
J. W. Horst, Sokchor
W. Beek, Esq. Borskalr,
•W. Brearley, Esq.
Rev. &herself
Joseph Seholefueld, Merchant
%Faber. Merchant
Rev. J. Carrie, Handeworth
J. Corrie, Solicitor .
H. Haat, Esq. The Brides
W. Fletcher, Esq. Aston
G. Eyre Lee, Esq.
W. Phipoon, Esq. Edgbaston .
Phipson and Doughty, Merchants
G. Cosby Lee, Esq.
Y. Clarke, Esq. Edgbaston .
•C. Ingleby, Solicitor
J. Webster, Eaq. Penns •
T. Cbopsing, Manufacturer
Henry Sparrow, Mercb a n Wolverhampton
Thome Pemberton, Esq. Great Barr
T.Y. Haat, Req. The Brides
Edward Cotton, Esq. .
Suomi Dawes, Esq. The Leverets,
Thomas W. Hills and Sons, Hazlewood
School
J. T. Lawrence, Esq. Moseley
T. Lee, Req. Esigbaston
T. Byre Lee, ksq.
R. Smith, Esq. Essibaston
W, Spurrier. Solicitor
William tlialkway, Esq. Edgbaston
James Drake, Stationer
Arch. Keorick, Esq. West Bromwich
Arch. Kenrlck, jun. Esq. West Bromwich
Tien. Kenrkk, Req. West Bromwich ;„. I
The following Bankers have obligingly consented to receive
scriptiock

Lonnow—Messrs. Child and Co. Temple Bar ; Messrs.
and Co. Strand; Messrs. Curtis, Robarts, and Co. _
street; Messrs. Drumitonds, Charing-cross; Messrs. Goslings
Shupe, Flset•stseet ; Messrs. Haerunersleys and Co. "
Messrs. Harries, Farquhar, and Co. St. James's.street
Hoare and Co. Fleet-street; Messrs. Ransom and Co.
mall • East ; Messrs. Rogers and Co. Clentent's•laoc;
Smith and Co. George-street, Mansion House.
Buccsuar—Messrs. Brooke, and
Messrs. Wigaey and Co.—Bristol ; Messrs. Elton, Raillie,
—Derby ; Messrs. Smith and Co.—Leicester; Messrs. '
and Babington.—Uncoln; Messrs. Smith, Ellison, and
tingbam ; Messrs. Smith and Co.—Preston ; Messrs. Pedder•
sham, and Co.; Messrs. Clayton and Co.; Years.
and Coo—York ; Messrs. Wilson, Tweedy, and Co.
So:mann—Edinburgh ; the Royal Bank of Scotland,
of Scotland; the British Linen Company; Sir W. Forbes
Messrs. Ramsay, Sonar, and Co.—Glasgow ; the Royal '
Bank of Scotland; the Glasgow Bank ; the British
parry; and all the Branches of the Royal Bank, the Bank
land, and the British Linen Company.
Iszussz—Dublin; Bank of Ireland ; Messrs. Ball
Robert saw, Barn and Co. , Messrs. Latouche and
the Branches of the Bank of Ireland, and of the Provincial
of Ireland.
A

bas been provisionally appointed,
of the following Noblemen and Gentlemen:
EMAIL!' J. Lars row, Esq. N. P.
Lord flownan DZ WALDZS.
- Honourable G. Asa& &Alf, M.P.
lad Howse. •
Lord Monrovia, M.P.
Honourable W. S. Namur. M.P.
Tomas &sum Rica, req. M.P.
Ata►saa& lbauso, Req. ►I.P.
Awns PLANTA, Esq. M.P.
E. J. Dynes, Esq. M.P.
3. Lemmas. Eeq.
Joint Hors, Esq. M.P. SoL.Gen. for Scotland
Lord G. 13sernscs.
Jona Donsary, Esq. bI.P. (Dublin).
To whom all Communications connected with the
neasebt are requested to be addresied, enclosed to Lord
as Weans., Tomlin Oda, Leaden.

,
. —in
',wrar • • ~..717... ~..f7 %- ." • • . , '• .
,4.„
1,.
' • •
,• . ....r. 4.1111"tt . 4,,' 1 ' ' ''''
.... -.. _ .
• * • ": ^ *- .. : t-4,
. ' . '`
- . • ''' • • .. , •%. ''•
"•,* ... ' ' ...Tie. ' • '', .
.'., . • •
_lt,,de
..s.. .
,"/ S:-. . , - .
- • .. . _
" •' - . Irr- - -A: ,
. .
.. • . • . :07,1ettn.115,11, , •
. ,
•4, ..
* . 4'.
*. • ,
qp'
-j
%s.*‘ V : •
~ ~• •
: ••: .
. •••' . 112/44<ieAVOL44-. 1....
... .. •
. _ .
ENEVG, DECEMBER 18, 1827. ,
- .
.- [PRICE SIMBNPENCII. ;
4_ ..1 .
*
d r
LAW INraLLAGENCE. The decree, therefore, must he, lot the H. hr ,o grant
.1
f a Mar. a renewal of the lease to the Vicar, and tit p.y the Costa
limited to COURT OF CHANCERY, Demme 17. of the suit. 1
is offer the Immediately after the LORD CHANCILLOR came into
COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Dec. 14. 1 tea whose court, Mr. Brace, who has been frequently heard upon
a motion, the object of which is to obtain a rehearingof SITTINGS AT 0/211TMINSTIIII.
Ibidweirs' a matter which he contends has been erroneously decided (Befure Lord °kittiwake TIORTILDIaIaud 4 SoilßstJasy.)
against hint, rose to address his, Lordship, and said, TMI moo V. BRADLEY. •
4
--"-- " My Lord, you said on Eat urea thatwould de-
y a you The circemstaticorout of which this-criminal Woo,.
T TO. •
cidethe motion which I made a week ago. I have now motion originated have been so frequently before the
I NG. to state farther-1 public in the discussions both in and out of Parliament. .
S.
ao Sr 6d• The LORD CHANCELLOR.—I have already beard you. that we should have supposed that all interest about
The last time I did so you were three hours in making them had lone since cenoed ; but the knowl-dge that ,
• •
your statement, and you completed all that you had to the Duke of Wellington, Lord Palmerston, Sr Henry I
o o say upon the subject. I have since read a paper which Torrent, and several other persons of rank, were. subs - 1 1
o o you handed. containing your reasons against the former paned as witnesses .for the defendant, revived lb.
decision, 1 have read and considered them, and I see curiosity of the million. and the Court was auordingly o o no reasonwhatever to disturb the decision. filled to repletion some time before one o'clock. thehose
o o
10 4 Mr. Berme.— But, my Lord, I have additional state- at which Lord Tenterden had appointed to take it. I
o o ments tosenalle, and I request to be heard. The Arrossav•Gemanat. said that this prosecution •
o u The ' anCuoxestame.—You have no right to be 'arose out of a criminal information which the Coot of I '
o o . ,
heard a in, and you cannot be permitted to interrupt King.. Bench had ordered to be filed on the application —I.; o o the CPR 4 business itiothe Cony. ~, of Ileatenant-Gesitral Feller, an Officer of rank and re. ;I 1
4411.4•48461145114 laarrlitit'lMa Wig* that potation in his Majtory's mikes Sir it mew - 4
••• -O'. ' •
o
.6. 1.1%. foriFwith exhibk articles of impeacneseetazlt airy to state that this oes a purely private -4
o a troth' Lordship fpr refusing to hear me, and- 7 instituted to defend his dim from the atrocious es. I 1
•a. for your conduct towards me in This cause. I shall, for thusluies which the defendant published against him;
o 0 o
this purpose, take my papers to some Peer of Paella left, by prejudice or malice, it shooklipe•said. that be. ti
o o
0 ment Quo many of whom I have the honour of being cause he (the AttornepOeneral) appeared its it, it was t
o know.
. • semethhisolore than an ordinary prolecutiono At the '
s o The Loan CSIANCIALOR.—You may tate any course time when the libel was published, General Fuller re-
-10
0 you think hest.; but if you want your case to be reheatd, sided at Versailles. In 1814,_he had been Commander-
Oo' you must present a petition in the same way as all the koChief•of the fermi iaJamaies. In 1824 the defend.
to o/' • nth-r suitors of the Court must do. iI • ago brought an action against Colonel Arthur, fora false
Mr. Bruce.—" My Lord, I have no money for that imprisonment which he had suffered at Houdin:a
ks o •
.purpose, nor to fee Counsel." He was proceeding fur- In the defence which Colonel Arthur merle to that
o o
'the:. when • action, he had found it necessary to produce a con- '
10 0 The Loan Cunxcaxtoa desired him to be silent, and mission granted to him by General Fallen to prove 0
o o to let the business of the Court proceed. - that he was the Commander of Ifloaderas, that :
Mr. SUODEN rose to complain of Mr. Bruce's taking weir a dependency of Jamaica, and liable to the con-
-10 o up time unnecessarily. Mr. Bruce, however, seemed trout of the Governor and Commander of that Colony. ,
determined to go on, until the Loan Cloatecatooa told It appeared in the course of that inquiry, in whist Geo. I
s o some of she officers to remove him if he did not desist. Fuller took no part, that that commission bore date in II . •'"
Mr. Bruce, " upon this hint," remained quiet, and after 1814. It likewise appeared, that in consequence of the 'I •
fi
s o a few minutes quitted the Court. imprisonment being longer than was reasonable,' •t
0 o There was no other matter of public interest in the the plaintiff in that case, and the defendant in this. woo.
1 . ,
o 0 Court.
O 0 withstanding that. commission granted by Gen. Pellet,
THE KING OPAPAIN 0. HULLATT AND 011111,311.
1 oobtained a verdict. Some time afterwards (4th Match.
The argument of the demurrer in this case, the par- 1826) the defendant addressed a letter to Gen. Feller.
hats: • titulars of which have been often stated, was fixed for enclosing a copy of the commission, requesting bids to
s o three o'clock to-day, and it was settled that only one make an affidavit, stating whether he had ever signed ,4,
• 0 Counsel should be heard on each side. .
3 0 Mich a commission as was then produced; and of he '
2 o Sir C. Werneitato opposed, and Mr. Rtmatt.z. sup- bad, when he had, by whom it was drawn sap, in what r
.
1 o ported, the demurrer, which was filed on the ground of form, and at what time it was notified to CM. Arthur.
30 ,
the misjoinder of the plaintiff, the King, with the agents General Fuller, on the 16th March, acknowledged the
o
t o appointed on behalf of the Spanish Government. The receipt of Col. Bradley's letter, and a copy of the com.
s o argument occupied the remainder of the day. mission, which he admitted he had given to Col.Arthar. 6
° • ROLLS COURT, Doc. 17. He likewise stated that he believed the copy seat to him
9
2 o JUDGMENT, to be an exact copy, but declined to swear to its being
a 0 vita ATTORitIY GENZRAL v. TPIR BISHOP OE ELT. so from the length of time since he bad granted it.—..
1 0 In this case, which was argued at great length on Col. Bradley, instead of being coital! with this answer. .
e Friday last, the Master of the Rolls this evening gave wrote, on the 21st .T01y,1826, another letter to General .
3 0
2 • -064111keNt•'• '- '. Faller, in which be expect& a hope that the General r
. ,
' Ili
a o His Holton* observed, that this 1101 10 information would accede to his former request, in order to avert
3 0 filed by the Attorney General, on the relation of the the publication of the part which he (General Fuller)
s o 0
Rev. Mr. White, the Vicar of Stradbrook, in the county had taken in the "shameful conspiracy" against the
2
a 0 of Suffolk, praying that the defendant, the Bishop of writer, and calling upon the General, from, regard to
1 o Ely, as Impropriate Rector of the perish of Stradbrook, his reputation, to do him the act of justice he required,
1 0 might •be decreed to grant to the relator a renewal of or he should, without delay or compunction, proceed to
i 0 1
0 a lease of the tithes of corn, grain, and hay, which had unmask to the world all the misdeeds of the conspire.
i'
been held by the Vicar of Stradbrook, as belonging to tors, who had combined to blast his reputation and to
10 6 the Vicarage, since the year 1682. In that year, it ap- blight his fortunes. It denied the authority of the Ge-
-10 0 peared, the then Bishop of Ely granted to the then neral to confer a commission upon Colonel Arthur. and
. I r
2 0
1 0 Vicar of Stradbrook a lease, for '2l years,of those tithes stated, that the writer was prepared to prove that the F
3 0' 1
0 which formed the entire property of the impropriated commission was not signed in 1814, as it purported to
a o Rectory. This lease had been continued, bt renewal, be. It would be for the defendant on this occasion to if •
at the end of every 21 years from that time, until Oc- shew that such an address loan officer of high rank was •
2 0 tober, 1826, at a rent of 81. per annum, and a fine of consistent with the respect that was due io him. His
3 0 100 marks. On the expiration of the last lease, in Oct. own opinion was, that such a threat was not only mdse. • . i
s 0
• 1826, the present Bishop of Ely refused to renew, con- 'coming to the party to whom it was addressed, but to
• 2 o tending that he was not, by law, bound so to do. The that from whence it came. On the sth of August,
2 f present Vicar had founded his claim to a renewal on General Fuller returned an answer to this epistle, re-
i
the letter of King Charles the Second, addressed to ferring the writer to Mr. Bullock, the Secretary of the I
0 o
2 o Bishops and other Ecclesiastical persons. in the year Duke of Manchester, and to Major Hall, the Military
, 4
2 o 1661, exhorting those persons to endow. for the benefit Secretary at Jamaica, for the official dates ofsCoionel 11
1 0 of the poor Vicars and Curates, such of their impro- Arthur's commission; and requested that all corretporo
receive Sub. priated or appropriated Rectories as were not then dente between them might cease. In reply to that letter,
sufficiently endowed. Endowments were, accordingly, Colonel Bradley, on the 22d of December, 1826, sent
!ssrs Courts made by grants of leases, and otherwise; and by a another letter, expressing his surprise that an officer of
.
, Lombard. Statute which passed in the year 1676 (29 Charles 11. General Fuller's rank in the British army, and his station
Gosling. and c. 8), such endowments were confirmed and rendered in society, should, by a pitiful evasion, seek to get rid •
f
is. Pall mall; perpetual. The claim of the Vicar was founded on this of charges which so materially affected tit honour;
let; Messrs. letter and Act of Parliament; and the presumption, and directly accusing him with having signed at
Co 1, Pall-
prima facie, was in favour of that claim, after an enjoy- Paris a commission which purported to be signed by . a
Sc; Messrs. .
meat of nearly 150 years. That- presumption, however, him, in 1814, in Jamaica. He blamed General
was not conclusive, but was to be considered with refe- Fuller for referring him to the official personages in ,
tenet to the circumstances of the case. There could be Jamaica, stating that they were the General's tools, and
.—Brighten; no doubt that the lease which had been made in 1682, that the General was himself the tool of a superior
illie, and Ca. was such an augmentation cf the Vicarage as came within power. He declared that he possessed the power of
I's' 51"fi'ld the meaning of the Letter of Chas. ii. and it was equally dragging the General's employer from his lurking- . .
d Co.—Not- clear that the subsequent statute of Charles rendered place, and of inflicting upon the General the snortifica-
'"idesrilew- such augmentation perpetual. The only question, tion of knowing that he had been the silly dupe of a
ArDawanda therefore, was. whether in the year 1661, after the is. very weak and profligate person. The military annals,
suing of the King's Litter, a lease was made by way of he added, did not furnish so disgusting an instance of
4; the Bank endowment of the Vicarage in question? If such lease infernalvillainy as that which had been displayed in
Is
rbes and Co.; was made, there could be no doubt that the present the dark conspiracy against him; but all words, he s
al Bank ; the Vicar of Stradbrook was entitled to a renewal. There conceived, were thrown away on a person who was so
I
Lin„„ corn. was no dinct evidence to shew that such lease had dea: to justice as voluntarily to injure a man of whom
Sank of Scot- been made.but there were strong grounds for presuming he knew nothing but what was honourable, and- who
that fact, independent of the long enjoyment and the refused to repair the wrong he had done when an 00. •
and Co.; Sir successive renewals since the year 1682. The lease portunity was offered him, even at the time when be
1 ,Co.;i and of the 18th of March, 1602, was made exactly 21 years was on the brink of exposure. The Learned Counsel,
ncia i
from the time of King Charles's Letter. This fact alone after reading this letter to the conclusion, said, that it
.ak all
afforded a presumption that a lease had existed in the was the misfortune of some men to consider themselves
year 1661. It was stated, however, that there was no individually of such great importance that all mankind
Kir crashing entry of any such lease in the Bishop's books, as re- were interested in every event which concerned them. 1
quired by the statute of 29 Chas. 11. and it was con- How could the defendant suppose that the Government
tended on the Eart of the Bishop, that that circumstance of Jamaica, the Government at home, General Fuller,
afforded a presumption that no such lease had ever Lord Palmerston, and all the individuals who' were
been made. The King's Letter, however, did not te- officially acquainted with this transaction, would Coe. '
quire any such entry to be made, and no such entry spire, without any apparent reason, to crush so humble 11-1
was rendered necessary until the Act of Parliament, an individual as he was? To resume the narratives.—
* hub did not pass ulna sever al years subsequent to 1661. On the 29th of August General Fuller returned an -
His Hosova adverted to other objection, urged on the answer to the letter just read, declining all further cot-
part
of the ashop to the claims of the Vicar, and said, respondence with Colonel Bradley, and informing him
that, admitting some weight to be due to them, he was that whenevet his threatened calumnies should be put- _ .
s
nevertheless of opinion, that the presumption of endow. tidied, they should be duly noticed in a Court of Jus-
ment arising from enjoyment of so valuable a property tire. That letter produced another letter from Colonel
[(Edinburgh). for so long a period, was so powerful as to overbalance Bradley, dated the Bth of September. 1826, stating
all those objections; and that, according to every grin- that nothing would gratify him more than the protect:.
ciple of law and of mason, the Vicar ought to have the tion with which the General threatened him; that it
• Intended Mo- benefit of the long acquiescence op the part of the pro- would enable him to prove the active part which 0 0
Lord Howasa decessurs of the present Bishop in the claim, which had General had taken in the foul conspiracy to destroy
from time to time been made, ever since the year 1682. him. General Fuller took no notice of this letter, sup.
- . ..