Star.
London, England, 1819-03-10 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

VICZCHANCELLOR'S COURT, MARCH 10.
BRADSHAW V. BRADSHAW.
Mr. 4oAtt said, this was a motion to have the re-
port confirmed which the Master shad made in .this
case. By the will of the testator, the plaintiffs, who
are his children, were made wards of the Court, and
the guardians he had appointed were subject to the
approbation of the Court. He had several large
estates, and an application was formerly made by the
plaintiffs said their nearest of kin, that it might be
referred to the Master, to inquire and report what
number of trees were fit to be cut down and sold. The
case accordingly went to the Master, before whom it
appeared that upwards of 44)0 trees were fit to be cut
down and sold, without delay, as they were beginning
to decay. The Master reported that such was his
opirlion ; and the application no* made was that the
report should be confirmed. •
The VICE-CHANCELLOR ordered the report to be
confirmed that the sale should take place with the
appxobattbn of the nearest of kin, to save expenses ;
and that the pmceeds should be paid into Court, to
await the final result.
COMMON PLEAS.
• LOSS 01 LICENSHARTIN V. HOMER.

Mr. CAMPBELL opened the case. The declaration
stated, that the plaintiff was possessed of a public-
house, called the Magdalen Coffee-house, in Black-
friars-road ; that his license was about to expire in
September; in the last yeer, and that upon applying
to have it renewed, for which purpose he obtained .a
certificate from the churchwarden and overseer of
the parish thht he was a person of good fame, the
slefendant maliciously induced the Governors of the
Magdalen Hospital to publish of and concerning him
the following This public-house, the Mag-
dalen Coffee-house, is the resort of bad women of the
lowest'class, principally on Sundays, when they are
guilty of conduct and language such as is produc-
tive of the greatest annoyance to persons going to
their different places of worship." In consequence
of this libel, the Magistrates refused to grant to the
plaintiff' a renewal of his license, whereby he was
greatly injured, and ruined in circumstances. There
were other counts stating the faCts differently. The
defendant first pleaded the general issue, not guilty ;
and then a justification, namely, that the house was
of the character which he had described. This the
plaintiff by his replication denied, and upon this is-
sue was joined.
. Mr.'Serjeant Lens impressively described the state
of utter destitution to which the plaintiff had been
reduced by the conduct of the defendant, who had,
from motives which it was difficult to understand,
- thought proper to make a representation to the Go-
vernors of the Magdalen Institution, which induced
them to write the libel which had been read, and
which being sent in a letter to the licensing Magis-
trates on the licensing day, caused them to withhold
frant the defendant his license. It was impossible to.
c!eny, from the local situation of the house in ques-
tion, that persons of a bad character occasionally
vent into it. This could not be prevented. But it
ssas e•ell known that the plaintiff, since he had em-
barked his property in the premises, had .succeeded
in utterly pi eventing the disorders which were known
to have previously existed, and at the time when this
unfoitunate blow %vas struck, he was effecting a gra-
dual reformation. For this injury he (Mr. Serjeant
Lens) wasted -the Jury would feel themielves bound
to give the plaintiff a moderate compensation. He
would not ask of their hands the amount of the total
loss of the plaintiff. becaisse he was satisfied that the
instice of the Magistrates, upon hearing the facts of
the case, would lead them to renew the license at the
first opportunity.
Mr. Ware, clerk to the Licensing Magistrates,
preyed that he had known the Magdalen Coffee-
house between 30 and 40 years. He knew that the
plaintiff had held the house in the last year, and that
lie had applied.in September for a renewal of his li-
cense, but than it had been 'refused. A letter was
sent from the Committee of the
.Magdalen Hospital
to the Licensing Magistrates, in consequence of which
it was that the licence had been stopped.—The letter
was here put in and read. .
Mr. TARDY objected to several variances beteieen
the letter and the record, but the objection was Over-
ruled by the Court.
The, witness, in continuation, said, that from the'
local situation of the Magdalen Coffee-house, it was
impossible to keep an improper description eff persons,
out of it—he meant women of the town. The-house
v.as situated at the corner 9f Dover-street, and he be-
lieved there was not a house in that street that was
not. inhabited by profligate women.
William Roberts, clerk to the Magdalen Hospital,
• was next called : his evidence went to substance to
prove that the defendant had called upon him and
asked him whether he had not witnessed the profli-
gate scenes which were exhibited at the Magdalen
Coffee-house ? he said he had. The defendant then
expressed a hope that he would mention what he had
seen to the Committee, and request them to write
their opinion to the Licensing Magistrate of the nui-
sance which existed. He did so, and in consequence
of what he said the letter was written.
In cross-examination, lie said, that since the licence
hal been stopped, it appeared as if they were not in
the same neighbourhood. He often saw women half
naked opposite the Hospital, and near to the house
• in question.
Mr. Robert Pott, the Chairman of the Committee
`by whom the letter was written, said that it had been
.. written in consequence of the representation of Ito-
. bens. A Mr. Woodridge having called upon him
'do a sul:sequent day, however, he.wroie another let-
ter 'to the Magistrates. stating the fact, from Mr.
NVeodridge's communication, that the plaintiff had
• bee,. in the house bnt two months, and that he had
• greatly-refotmed it.
Tne Lord Cuter Jrsrtcr now intimated that there
was no ground for continuing the cause, as it was
manifest, from the testimony of Roberts,ahat the de-
.4endant had -desired that the Committee should write
their own-opinion, and not his.
Mr. Serjeant Ltss acquiesced, and the plaintiff was
nonsuited.
i The Lord Cum itTrricx said he thonght the pub-
lic were zy indebted to the defendant for having
i mbai Dui nuisance under the notice of the Maga-
itatentlutioithat period.

_.

WINCIMSYSi.
HAI, Hardie, was isdicted for haring kilied Ed-
mund Saunders. The deceased was shot by the pri-
sbner whilst in the act of running away from a turnip-
field, where he had been committing a robbery. The
l'orisoarr• expressed great sorrow for the circumstance.
lie was found Guilty of Manslaughter, fined £lOO,
and ordered to be imprisoned six months.

BUCKINGHAMSHIRE.
IIAywARD V. YOUNG.
This was a writ of inquiry to assess the damages
for the breach of an agreement. In Februarys 1812,
Mr. Young had engaged with Mr. Hayward, a sur-
geon and apothecary, at a salary of one hundred
guineas a year ; and at the same time bound himself
in a bond of £lOOO that if he should at any time dis-
continue his assistance to Mr. Hayward, he should
not set up for himself within twenty miles of Ayles-
bury, on pain of forfeiting his bond. In April,lBlB,
Mr. Hayward and young parted, and Mr. Young
then commenced business for himself, and many of
the patients, from 12 to 18, whom Mr. Young had
attended as for Mr. Hayward, oontinued to be visited
by Mr. Young.—A verdict was given for the plain•
tiff—Damages £3O, subject to further actions until
the £lOOO shall be fully discharged.

CHELMSFORD, MARCH' 9.
• DOE ON THE DEMISE OF BURDETTO. WEIGHT.

This case occupied nearly the whole day, and
though dull in the detail of circumstances,, was of
considerable importance, and of singular 'circum-
stances. It was an action of ejectment, to recover
possession of an estate called Fanstead Hall, in this
county, and of which the defendant had, some few
weeks back, been put in possession by the Crown, to
whom it had escheated for want of heirs, she having'
sbewn her descentfrom one Robert Wright, an ances-
tor of her family, the grandfather of Lord Keeper
Wright, but since that period the present claimant
had discovered that he was one degree nearer allied
to t' e last possessor, the on of the ancestor from
whom she made her descent. _

Mr: 'Serjeant ONsLow stated the case, and various
persons froth whom the plaintiff claimed, with great
perspicuity, until the estate vested in the last per-
son, a Mrs. Elizabeth Oglethorpe, the wife of Ge-
neral Oglethorpe, a gentleman who died some years
back at the advanced age of upwards of 100. She,
being possessed of the estate, left,it to Mr. Granville
Sharpe, for his life, with directions to him to settle
the fee for charitable uses. This devise being void as
to the charitable uses, upon the death of Mr. Gran-
ville Sharpe the estate would have escheated to the
' Crown, but for the remote title made to it by the de-
' fendant, Mrs. Barbara Wright, to whom the Crown
delivered it. An advertisement was put into the
papers calling for the heirs. This produced a claim
by a Sir William Bagnell Burdett, of Ireland, but he
could not substantiate his claim, and in the investi-
gation of his title the present claimant was discover-
ed, a little tradesman at Hull. The Learned Ser.
jeant having given the details of the pedigree,
Mr. Cuawoon stated, that they should begin their
evidence with the common ancestor of the claimant
and person last sized, who was a Mr. Nathan Wright,
a merchant of London, and Lord of the Manor of
Cranham, in this county; and the first evidence called
Was Mr, Ilignold Norroy, King at Arms. He pro-
duced a visitation, made under the King's Commis-
sion in 1664, by which it appeared, that at that time
the following was the state of the family :—Mr. Na-
than Wright had then- a son called Benjamin, who,
was created a Baronet, the patent of his creation
being produced, Nathan Wright's will wit' then read,
and it appeared that at his death his family consisted
of Benjamin, a daughter, Susan, who was first mar-
ried to Stephen Potts, Esq. afterwards to Francis
Drake, Esq. of which marriages there were six chil-
dren. His next daughter, Mary, was married to
Robert Burdett, an Alderman of London ; a third
daughter, Alice, married to a John Wolpin, a mer-
chant of London ; and two unmarried daughters.
Sir Benjamin Wright *was succeeded by his son, Sir
Nathan Wright ; this Sir Nathan by his son Sir Na-
than. The List Sir Nathan, by his brother, Sir
Samuel, who seas the last Baronet. He was suc-
ceeded by his sister, Elizabeth, who married General
Oglethorpe, and was the person last seized of the fee,
and in her ended the last lineal descendant of the

Wrights.
nr.Citirtv'then called for the documents to prove
the pedigree a the Potts and the Drakes, the descen-
dants of the marriages of the first daughter of Na-
than Wright, the common ancestor. The line in the,
Potts ended in a single female,who married Sir Wil-
liam Villiers, of Brooksby, in eicestershire, and, by
his monumental inscription, it appeared there was no
issue. Of the Drakes there appeared to be five sons,
by the two eldest of whom there is issue living. It
clearly was' established that, though they descended
from the same father, they did not by the same mo-
ther, and therefore could not inherit, being only of
the half blood ; and the extinction of the three of the
whole blood were sheen to be extinct.

The Counsel for the plaintiff then resorted to the
iisuo of the next .daughter, Mary, who married Ro-
bert Burdett, the merchant, in the early part of
Charles the Second. By wills and documents of the
family they shewed that Robert Burdett left six sone
Nathan, Francis, Robert, Leicester, and Benjamin
Burdett ;. of these Robert died at Aleppo, unmar-
ried; Leicester was busied at Putney, and no men-
tion was made of issue on his monumental inscription.
Francis administered to Nathan, and therefore it was
-tO be presumed that he left no issue, and of Francis
no traces were found after the legacy left him by his
father. Wright Burdett, the fifth son, was Rector of
Hornsey ; he had a son called Wright Burdett, who
was described of Henley on Thames; he -had a se*
also called Wtir,ht Burdett, and from the last am
the Claimant descended. These facts were proved bi
family wills, illustrating and throwing lights on sick
other, by certificates of marriages, births, and bud*
by monumental inscriptions, by recitari in deeds I, and
when one source of evisjenct failed, such great dili-
gence had been used, that no lihksithis complkates)
case, but what was most fully and clearly establishes).
Mr. Justice PARK, who tried the maw, said, he
had nererseen a case of deeceat so dearly •
and asked Mr. Marry= if be pas prepared to too.
overt any of the facts ? •
Mt. MenariTt said, Ise bed fret es abjecsiss Its
-
point law, and spited kW iiiiiciiitrinet•

11qa1 estate, insisting it was ditstanding in the heirs
'ot'Mr:Granville Sharpe. .
The Learned Joao' r4id he would not decide that'
point of Law, si then, but leave him to move
that hereafter. He d also direct the Jury to
presume that that term had been' decided. He next
;addressed the Jury, and insisted that the extinction
of the elder brothers of the Silt Wright Burdett had
not been proved sufficiently, and contended the Jury
would presume that they had married and had issuz.
Mr. Serjeant Osst,ow having replied with a great
deal of humour on the argument that a man should,
be presumed to have a wife and children, the• Jury,
under the direction of the Learned Judge, found a
verdict for the Plaintiff. .

DOE, ON TI1! DEMIST 9, SACKETT, V. 11,p1VEY AND
• OTHERS.

This was an ejectment to recover the possession of
certain premises, consisting of two tenements, situate
at Witham, in this county, in the possession of M.
Bernard Harvey, a bankrupt.
Mr. MARRYATT and Mr. COMM conducted the
plaintiff's case, and Mr. GURNEY and Mr. H. I. Srs-
mint the defendants'.

It appeared in evidence, that the premises in ques-
tion originally belonged to a Mr. Baker, who by his
will devised the Name to his son, Thomas Baker, for
life, with the remainder in fee to the daughter of the
latter, Rachael Baker, who married the fither of the
present lessor of the plaintiff. During the life time
of the tenant for life, Mr. Matthew Bernard Harvey
purchased the premises in question of him in fee, for
valuable consideration, on an express undertaking that
the mother of the lesior of the plaintiff, who at the
'time of her marriage was under age, should levy a
fine, and suffer a recovery under this contract. Mr.'
Harvey had entered upon the possession (f the pre-'
mists, and had expended between I:3000 and £4OOO
in improving the same. But the mother of the les-
sor of the plaintiff had never levied any fine nor suf-
fered any recovery, and the present action was
brought by her son and heir against the assignees of
Mr. Matthew Bernard Harvey, to recover possession,
of the premises.
• The case, as above stated, was clearly proved, and
the defendant: Counsel being unable to suggest any
substantial objection to the ejectment, a verdict was
foUnd for the plaintiff.
Mr. Justice PARR, in the ccurse of the argument
upon the case, said, that under the like circumstances
he had, when at the bar on the Northern Circuit, re-
covered for Lord Byron prorerty to the amount of
£lB,OOO in Lancashite.

CROWN Stns.—Charles Britten, alias Burton' was
indicted for assaulting John Potter on the WhofMay
last, in the parish pf Fyfield, and taking from his per-
son a £5 Romford Bank note, a. check upon the
same Bank for £2O, and two £1 Bank of England
notes.—lt appeared is evidence, that the prosecutor
was a surgeon, residing at Chipping Ungar. In the
evening of the 9th of May last, he had occasion to
go upon his. professional duty to Fyfield, and about
nine o'clock, it being then light, he saw two men be-
fore him, and as he approached them on horsehick,
he heard one say, ,4 now for it." He slackened the
pace of his horse, when the prisoner came up and
seized the reins, and desired the prosecutor to stop.
The other man then drew .out a horse pistol, and pre-
senting it at the prosecutor's head, said, " Give us
your money, or I'll shoot you." The prosecutor dis-
ounted and the prisoner rifled his pockets of the
property in question, whilst the other man kept his
pistol alterrattely at his head and breast. The pro-
secutor swore positively to the prisoner's identity.
The Learned Judge BAYLEY summed up the case,
hut the Jury found the prisoner Not Guilty, 'assign-
ing for Cause that the prosecutor, after the lapse, of
five months, might be mistaken in the prisoner'sperson

Saturday se'nnight the following daring robberies
were committed upon the toll road within a mile of
Gatehouse of Fleet, in Galloway, by three men, about
seven o'clock in the evening :—lst, Alexander Gov
don, printer, in Kirkcudbright, was attacked and
robbed of a bill, for 351.15. one shilling of silver and
an umbrella-2d, Robert Dickson,farmer in Magree,
ho was on horseback, of a 'silver watch ; Thomas
Sproat, in Rainton, who was walking alongside of
Mr. Dickson, was attacked; made his escape, and
was fired at in his retreat, but sustained no injury.-
3d, John Clark, warehouseman to Mr. Samuel Mac-
naught, merchant, Kirkcudbright; and James Par-
ker, Innkeeper at Twynholm Kirk, both on horseback,
and in company, were attacked ; Parker, by striking
sevetely the man.who seized his horse, escaped, he
also was fired at, but without doing him any injury ;
Clark was dragged from his Wine, and robbed of his
watch, and about I Ss. in silver, but they missed a
considerable sum in notes.-4th, James Rain, inTown-
head, was also attacked, butescaped. Clark, on his
arrival at Kirkcudbright, about tea o'clock, imme-
diately communicated the particulars of the attack
upon him and Parker without knowing any thing.of
the others, to the Procurator w-ho dispatched
a party of! officers to the Magistrates of Gatehouse,
with such information, that in consequence two ounsf
thee! re! robbersw'ere apprehended next morning before
it was almost known in Gatehouse the robberies had
happened. All three are from Ireland, viz.—Arthur
M'Kean, weaver, in Dumfries; John Stott, weaver,
in Maxwelltown, and John Kelly, labourer in Castle
Dopglas. M.Kean and Kelly, and a man, M4Millan;
who assisted in the escape of Stott, are committed to
Kirkcudbright jail.
A dating burglary was attempted at the Hour
Glass Inn, oa Walworth Conimcm. 'Between twelve
and one o'clockson Monday night, one of the lodgers
at the Inn was alarmed by a noise, in consequence of
which he got out of bed, and saw two men very busily
employed in pecforating the wall of the wine cellar ;
he got a loaded blunderbuss; which hung in the room;
then pulled up the sash, and called out to the thieves,
upon which one of them pulled out a large holster
pistoi, and discharged it at his head. It completely
shattered several squares of glass, and carried away
a part of the sash. The ball passed doe, to the gen-
tleman's ear, and lodged in the wainscot at the end
of the room, fortunately doing .him no mischief.—
Snow, an active constable, who lives on the Common,
was alarmed by the report of the pistol, aid proceed-
ed immediately to the spat, but the fellows made
their escape through the brick fields, at the back,
keying their booty behind threat
Nicisel Cind, . jaharged with ettmieg forged
Wft Mit% biolte out of ika cot in (wag of
llogadity islais)+s. • . .

DUBLIV,

THE TRIMLESTON CAUSE.
LLOYD V. TRIMLISTON.
This very important case, which had fcr
days occupied so large a share of legal argument
iuvesiigation, in the Common Pleas, was deticed
eleven o'clock last night by the Jury, which 1.,4,
been engaged in deliberation on it from 2aterea
evening, giving their verdict in fayour of Lcre3,44
leston. The terms in which the Jury deli-cred isf•
verdict were, " That the paper bearing date the c.
of December, 1812, is not the last will and teriert,
of the late Lord Trimleston."—Judge
consent of both parties, took the decLion of th:
on Sunday, (last night), in order to prevent
necessity of their further confinement.

BI RTHS. •
Yesterday, in Hamilton-Place, the infant son of the t.tt
Bedford.

Lately, at Burnet, near Bath, the Lady of Colonel ZtK
of a daughter.
Monday, at the Vicarage Cropredy, near Banbery,:ll
of the Rev. W. 1). Conybeare, bf a 1102.
----DIED.

Sunday, in Lower Seymotir-street, cf a I:cldea rrrk
attack, Sophia. wife of Lieutenant-Colonel ShedJez, ct
Dm, hear Lyinington.

SARACEN'S HEAD, SNOW-HILL, LONDO;.
*WILLIAM MOUNTAIN AND CO.'

Four InsidC Coaches, best Horses, and keep their Thr.e.
THE following Post-Coaches, Mail-Coaches, &
• set out from the above Inn:
FALMOUTH, Plymouth, Totnea, Exeter, Weyme
Dorchester, Dartmouth, and Salislasury, new Post Coach, ter
Morning at Seven; through Honiton, Axminster, liridfor
Blandford, Basingstoke, and Bagshot. Arrives at Plyrssl.•
the next Evening at half-past eight.
SOUTHAMPTON, I .yrnington, Winchester, Andover,
Basingstoke new Four Inside Coach, at half-past seven is
morning, us-Wei at the Dolphin Inn, Southampton, by hail •
tree. This is a most delightful conveyance to the Isle of Wit
Havre de Grace, Jersey, Guernsey, St. Maisie's, Cherbourg, .
BATH and BRIStOL Flying Pest-Coaches, through •
peuham, Calne, and Marlborough, every afternoon; arsine
Mr. May's, the Greyhound Inn, Bath, and the London Tts
Thomas-street, and the Swan, Bristul, next morning. Co-
to WeM, Bridgewater, Taunton, Exeter, and Plymcr-th.
The UMPIRE, a New LIVERPOOL Light Goad, or
one night on the road, carrying four insides and four Outliers,
out daily; through Dunstable, Woburn, Luthbory, Nur.)urp
ton, Welford, Lutterworth, Hinckley, Ml:crania, Litckte.
Shone, hugely, Newcastle, Knuteford, Warrington, and Prat
SHREWSBURY, Wellington, and Shill:sal Puss-C
. .

every evening, at five o'clock—Guardcd.
WRY NI ouTH, Dorchester, Blandfurd, Salisbury, A ndcvn
and Basingstoke new Post-Coach, every afternoon. The W
mouth packets to GuPrnsey, Jersey, Cherburg, St. M2loa.i,
LEEDS new Light Coach, called the Rockingham, err,
morning at eight; carries Four Insides only, goes rentarta'.'i
easy, with a • Guard throughout; passes through Stam4nl
Newark, Retford, Doncaster, and Ferrybridge, to the GO:-
Lion, Leeds, next morning. Notwithstanding 'the uncomngs
expedition of this Coach, it is allowed to be the most sgrteabk
and complete public conveyance on the North Road, beling
equalled by any other. •
GLASGOW, Longtown; Gretna-Green, Amnia, Durg:4!-
Brownhill, Thornhill, Sanquhar-Kiln; Cumnock,
all Parts of Scotland; a Post-Coach, (Daily).
YORK, Scarbormigjr, Whitty, Shields, Sunderland, Ns7;
castle, and Edirhurgh hew Four Inside Coach, thh a Gt..-
throughout ; sets out every miming, by way of Newark,
P.-
ford, radcaster, Darlington, Northallerton Durham, liorple
sad Berwick. Pauangers finding ,themselves fatigued on
jourdey, may rest what time they please, and theh proceed e.
without any additional fare.
MARLBOROUGH, and Swindon • new four-inside Pee
Coach, through Aidbourn, Reeding, fArabouro, Purton, L.
ditsgtos, Pitney, Wootton Basset, Ramsbury„ Huey:ford, an
Newbury ; every morning.
BRIDGRNORTH and Walsall Post. Couch, every weer!
BOSTON, Spalding. Peterborough, States, and Humingde
Royal Mail-Coach, every evening to Spilsby, Louth, GrimsLy
and flull.

CARLISLE. Pounds, and Whitehaven, pour Inside Post
Coach, and a G ward all the way. Passes through Brough,
pleby. Greatabridge, Richmond, Caneriek, Boroagbridge,Ke
fberby,Aberford,Doncaster, and Grantham. Sets out every mons
ing, and performs the journey filth the politest facility. Pante.
gets detained on the road by boluses, or ure, have the peer
liar fdvaatage of their seats big rice ed in the neat Cash.
KENDAL; Lancaster. Pray" Klrlsy-Lonsdale, Beat
Chorley, Ormskirk, and Oarsesio Post-Coaches, every Ammo
LIVERPOOL, Warrieghsa, Kontsford, Stow, Statord,nl
Litchfield Post-Cotach, the Dillson,every smug, to the S)-
raeen's Head Inn, Dekko:lnt, lAverpook.-thardsd diteerbout•
WAKEFIELD Post-Cosels, evert shaviog. •
CHESTER( N Whitehttreh; Tarporley, Nantwi,b,
Nosthwiels, and eh Post-Cosch every evening.
SUNDERLAND, Seecktosi, tad Yana, Coach, every Rory'
ing, to the George Inn Sunderland.
MANCHESTER, Winslow, Cootie:eon, Newcastle, Walr-4
and Wolverhampton Post-Coach; every afternoon—Ganda
SHEFFIELD and Rotherham Post-Coach, called the Rock-
ingham, every smarming.
BI R MIN GRA Past-Coach, Ovarded, lets oat every after-
noon, and reaches Birmingham neat day at noon. Passes by
Warwick, Leamington, and Deventry, to the Saracen's Herd,
Bull-street, Birmingham.
Northeave, Howden, Thorn, and Doncaster Post
Coach, every Morning, at half-put six, to the Cross Key., liat-
ket-plama Hull.
DOVER, Deal, ate, Sandwich, Ramsgate, Canterbury,
Faversham, Chatham, , and Stroud, Pon-Coady%
noon. and‘edght.
HERTFORD, Ware„Hoddosdon,and Cheshuat Coach every
Morning.
-rr W. MOUNTAIN and Co. respeetfulli acquaint theill
Friends and the Public, that they will not he accountable far any
Parcels. Passengers' Luggage, Writinp, Plate, An of more than
Fins Pomade wage, if lost, stolen, or dastard, makes elite"
as seek and the beennace paid for accordingly, at the Saracen's
Snow-hM, Loads*.

BY HIS MAJESTY'S ROYAL LETTERS PATEN I'.
f .EAKE'S GENUINE PILLS, justly Ilmr.U/
-2 -A for curing, Ind! its stages, the VENEREAL DISEASE.
One email Pill is a dose, and the taking of one Box, In a reset
case, will soon convince the patient of the certainty of his speed/
tsessity. Nothing Can be better condived, more sale, or mon
convenient than this Remedy, for sods as are obliged to go jeer'
nits or to sea, asst needs no confinement nor restraint of din:
and sixty years experience (in an extensive practice) has proved
that it will effect a Core when repeated Sallvaden and all otter
methods avail nothing.. For the Scurvy sad other Chronics!
Mortises, aids Medicine has net Its parallel. U;wardt
40,000 persons of both sexes have been radically eared o• the
above cruel disorders, within the lass eight years. Prep
sold by the Sob Proprietors, T. TAYLOR' and SON; Adeir'
of the Royal College of Surgeons, at their House, No. 9, Nto
Bridgoitrset, in Boxes of only Is. 9d. esth, duty 111°1164'.
N.B. Two both doors, and Lights in the Passages at night
The, are also moll by their appointment, with copious direciet!
alas Toy Ship, 103, Oxford-street; Mr. Dlsborough's,Ni."
Eldostreel-hill, neatly opposite the Manitowoc ; and by ooh
Person in every considerable Town In Oreatsßritain and IreiSOS
Advice grads to poisons takini the above, or other of the Is'e.
prime's McNeish*.

COAL MARKET. Maw 10.
Ships at Market. Ships Sold.. Prim _ ,
{it Nawcaatle Is, 311 a 6d to 4Si 3.1
Stuttlethad • ' s 44s 64_t_a_o______.0"

MOH WAWA at LONDON
• Mad*
Aft

EDGE TC-AlOll ROW.

40 minutes after 9
59 ........... ........9.
...._.

LONDON;

.

Published by Loo, Loh 1'+:d.:;•
Icopk-Lu!