Star.
London, England, 1829-07-07 00:00:00

IT. LIG VII AAAAA I

7 to 4 agst Minster; 2 to 1 ; gst Parnassus; 4 to 1 agst Concis;
5 to 1 agst Mirabrl; 100 to 4 apt Minster winning Liverpool
and Doncaster St. Levi.

TRADesstu% CCP.

7 to 4 agst Velocipede ; 4 to 1 apt laurel ; 9to 2 ag•t Dr.
Faustus; 7to 1 agst Delphine ; 7 to I agst 7 to I ::eat
Varllibb ; 8 to 1 agst Economist; 9 to I apt 114Istun ; 9 to 1 agst
Frederick ;9to 1 agst Jocelitie ; 10 to 1 :lot lien uoti 12 to 1
agst ILosalia • 12 to I agst Ilihernian ; 12 to 1 agst Chester Billy ;
20 to 1 apt 'Brunswick. Even 2 agst the field. Twelve are ex-
pected to sum

STAND 4UP.

5 to 2 agar Laurel; 5 to 2 agst Velocipede; 3 to I ages Ju-
piter; 5 to I agst

NETTING AT IIIANCHIViTtEI OM Tilt LITISIITOOL CUP.
5 to 5 on Velocipede ; 5 to 1 agst any other.
ROWING MATCH.

Yesterday afternoon a rowing match for thirty sovereigns, given
by the Red house Club, was appointed to take place, and the
crack Watermen of the river above bridge were the competitor..
The dibtance to be rowed was as follows: To start front buoya of:
the Red House, row round a boat moored near Battersea lit:idge,
down the Surrey shore, round a boat moored neat Nine Elms, and
back to a boat stationed off the Red House.

Soon alter four o'clock, the following watermen—Williarn Noul-
ton, Julan Cobb, John Harris, and Charles Campbell—started for
the first heat. Noulton took the lead at first for a short time, but
was passed in a gallant style by Cobb and Campbell. The odds
were 10 to I that one of the two latter would be the winning boat.
Harris. in consequence of some of Campbell's friends who were in
a cutter (as it would appear purposely) fouling his boat, gave in
soon after the start, and on the tcturn Nomlton gave in, his boat
having been fouled by the starting boat. Campbell came in first,
and Cobb about six boats' lengths astern of him. It was contended
that the heat ought to be rowed for again in consequence of the
fouling, and a great dispute took place.
The second heat was rowed for by James Parish, John Mitchell.
John Williams, and John Goatley ; and a finer display of manly
exertion, combined with superior skin and dexterity, we never
witnessed. Mitchell took the lead ; and the weather being rough,
he had the advantage, bring by fat the most powerful man. 'I he
heat became most interesting when within half a mile of the boat
on the return, the conte-t being between Parish and Williams
which should come in second. The men were cheered, arid de-
servedly, for their determined resolution ; they contested every
inch, and it was doubtful for some time who would take the lead ;
Parish, however, by an extraordinary effort, left his opponent a few
yards astern. Mitchell was first, and Parish second.
When the second heat had terminated, it was at too late an boor
for the match to be brought to a conclusion that night ; and
while some contended that the first heat ought to be rowed for
again, some of the members of the Club suggested that it would be
better for the whole eight watermen to row ter the grand heat. It
was finally agreed that the grand heat should be deterred till this
afternoon, when unusual sport is expected.

jLord DALHOUSIE and Sir SIDNEY 13EcKwini, the
itwo new Commanders in Chief in lodic, are both at Portsmouth,
awaiting the sailing of the ships which are to take them to their
irespectiye destinations.
It has already been announced that Sir TIIWiAs
Lamas:we is engaged upon a portrait of Ike young Queen of Pon- -
ritual. Her Majesty yesterday morning came to town from Pale- -
ham. about twelve o'clock, and gave Sir *ltionas a sitting of Heady •
two Lours, for the completion of the picture.
Letters from several tient eruen who attended the
Meeting at Ennis, of the " Friends of Mr. Vasty Fittcznatti."
arrived in town this morning, and announce that all intention of
contesting the county of Clare with Mr. O'Ctittitiam. had been de-
finitively abandoned. A Baronet, largely connected with Clare, .
stated to the same effect, in the Hall of the Courts this day.— •
Ihtbdit Esntittg Post.
CLASS Rif.olsTßlMlo—Tite amount of 10. free.
holders registered up to Wednesday evening was ssl. There was
little doubt entertained that they would hinny exceed 700. •
Several meetings of the Aristocracy were held, for the purpose of
concocting some plan to oppose Mr. O'Connell, but in vain. All
their deliberations ended in distraction and dismay.—Dublin Free.
,sass's Journesi

,LIGENCI

I NCERY, JUL- 1.
V. ROWS. _ .

The facts of this case will be recollected.

.1 _

in disposing of this case to-
, in the case of Jackson
plea of a purchase for a •a-
-• notice. The cause came

ice Chancellor, and he was

insufficient. " It afterwards
came upon appeal -before the Court, and I was of opi-
nion also, upon a particular objection that was made
to the plea, that it was insufficient. The case did not
state that the party pretended at the time of the exe-
cution of the settlement that she was seised in fee, and
I thought noon principle, and upon the authorities,
that on that particular ground the plea WAS insuffi-
cient. An application was made for leave to amend.
by ulr. Walker, by whom the plea was drawn, and
he stated, that it wits an accidental omission of his
own. I then said, it the other patty require an affida-
vit of the circumstance under which the slip had taken
place, they were entitled to have such an affidavit.—
An affidavit was accordingly prepared, pointeJ to that
particular circumstance. Upon this I directed the
amendment to be made, and an order for the amend-
ment was drawn up conformable to that direction. The
ground en which I proceeded was the prac•ice of this
Court, as stated in the case of Wood v. Strickland. In
that case it is laid down where a slip or mistake takes
place upon a point of importance, the party shall be
allowed to amend, upon an affidavit being made of the
circumstances .attending the slip or mistake, and the
Court being informed of what the exact nature of the
amendment is to be. I therefore thought I was war-
ranted by what was stated in that case in permitting
the amendment to be made, because the nature of the
amendment was disclosed ; it was distinctly mentioned
by the Learned Gentleman, to whom I have referred,
how the slip happened, and the whole was afterwards
put into an affidavit by the attorney in the cause. A
subsequent application was made for leave to make a
further amendment; but that application was not
grounded on any particular slip, nor was any affidavit
made of any particular circumstance attending it.—
Under these circumstances I think I should not be jus-
tified, according to the practice of the Court, in grant-
ing permission to make any further amendment.
Mr. Rosa hoped his Lordship would dismiss the ap-
plication with costs.
The SOLICITOR IJaNaRAL considered the question a
very fair one for the opinion of the Court to have been
taken upon, and consequently, he trusted the costs
would not be given.
The LORD CHANCELLOR did not think it was a pro-
per question to have been raised, destitute as it was of
ground to support it, therefore he felt bound to dismiss
the application with costs.
The Court proceeded on the Appeal Paper.
COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Wesesuarrza, JILT 6.
Sittings at Nisi Prius.

Before Lord Tnrrxaam l sod a Middlesex Comm Jury.
Lord TIINTERDEN sat at half past nine o'clock this
morning, for the purpose of disposing of undefended
causes, upwards of fifty of which were taken. At half
past elms o'clock his Lordbhip dismissed the Jury and
retired.

IYIIIMANCEJUDGMENT••-.HAHROT V. WISB.

Lord TWITIRDCW said, the Court were of opinion
that, although it might be presumed that the announce-
ment in the Gazette was a sufficient notification to all
British subjects, yet it would not go so far as to pre-
sume that the Captain had any knowledge of the tact
of the blockade, and as the Jury were of opinion he
had not, on that ground the verdict could not be al-
tered ; and as to the question of the illegality of the
voyage, the Court was not of that opinion, therefore
the rule could not be made absolute.
Rule refused.
YISH SAUCILHARVIT V. WINORAVE.

The Areoanzi Gallium had obtained in this case,
a rule to show cause why an order made by a Judge.
giving the defendant the names of persons who pur-
chased fish sauce of him, should not be discharged.—
The action was brought against the defendant for a
fraud in selling spurious fish sauce, hearing the plain-
tiff's name, and purporting to be sold by him. The
declaration did not contain the names of the persons to
whom the defendant had sold the article, and it was
urged before a Judge at Chambers that the defendant
could not safely proceed to trial without information
on the subject.
Mr. F. POLLOCK this day showed cause against the
rule, and contended that the defendant could not pre-
pare for trial without the names of the parties to whom
the sauce bad been sold was delivered to him.

The Arroaway.GatrsßAL, ii support of his rule, Ob-
served jocosely, that he did not expect to see his Learned
Friend so ready to receive spurious sauce for Reading,
or any other celebrated mixture. This was an action
for fraud, and surely the Court would not allow the de-
fendant to obtain information from the plaintiff, by
which he might defeat the action. The plaintiff's affi-
davit stated that his witnesses were customers of the
defendant, and therefore he did not think it safe to give
the defendant names of persons over whom he might
have influence. The Court would see that the action'
was of importance to the plaintiff; similar cases had
been frequently before the Court. A person sent bad
porter in bottles to the East Indies with another man's
name, and the plaintiff obtained considerable damages.
Lord Tzmanax—Let a man sell sauce in his own
name; then no one can complain of him. Them was
an action tried before Lord Kenyon, the plaintiff, a
perfumer in Fleet-street, complained that another bad
sold pomatum with his name.
The COURT, after some consideration, held that it
would be going too far to gi►e the names, but ordered
the rule to be absolute for discharging the order made
by the Judge, on the plaintiff undertaking to give the
defendant an account of the times when the fish sauce
was sold.
The ATTCARNET GRNRRAL consented to draw his role
up io these terms.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Juts.
KLIMA V. IARRZN.

It will be recollected that this was an action brought
agtinst Mr. W. Farrell for violating his engagement
with the proprietors of Covent-garden Theatre. The
Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, with 7501. da-
maps. An application was subsequently made to the
Court to increase the damages to 1,0001. that being the
amount specified in the deed as the mitigated damages
to be paid by whichever of the parties should violate
the contract.

The Loan CHIEF JUSTICE delivered judgment to
upon that application. His Lordship said, that in
the opinion of the Court the verdict ought not to be
dibtur bed.

_ _ ------ ___
Dife.ol.lM. LAW INTEL
--..as.
.\
/4.4,4%: .:± - AT OF CHM.;
~74 •7, 4 •••';' ',SJACILSON V
i'7•9,1 -.0....L"4 .I',' :"-• - ILLOR, in
4
VA. s . 'e question
k
400,44,
Neg 31,7,1 4: ' % upon a plc
-,- 'l(4'l'. • tion without i
itill4eßargialonour the Vice
of ()pinion thit the plea was in