Star.
London, England, 1811-07-01 00:00:00

. .
,_... . ,
, .
•_. . •
—..-:..;;;.• .-.ri
' -...,' :. '' 7 tr • -
41'-..
. ' 'iler . it. i. . ..11 - ' l'ert—M
s;,ve .n irecte._ to t..e „feet .i—a ...4 eldest
t pster,r4Yiv asked:me,
/tDid your Ladysliip"s mother este you'?—l rernem-
' ter i cotiVersatien with my another before she went
„to live hr Park.street with me, ibut I only desired she
~tvould have confideoce in are, *ad she never doubted
me ; A do.n.t.r!atiect that my mother ever asked me
*Abe question positively. ,
'l, • 'hit to he understood from +um Ladyship that
' your mother did not at that .yene (the tatter end
of 1785) directlyask.the question-of you upott What
f:Mting your Ladyship was tiring wide Lord Berke-
.. ley ?—I wish to know whe \her I have not answered
that question already .
• Whether your Ladyship's mother 'at that time di.
t ectly put the question.to your Ladyship upon what
tooting you were living with Lord Berkeley I—l do
not recollect at this moment that she did. . ; • ,
Did your Ladyship communicate to yhor mother
then, or at any subsequent time, end when, the fact of
your Ladyship being married ?—I wish to know whe-
ther by fact is meant the statement of the fact.
. The question only means whether your Ladyship
conununicated .to your mother that you were married
to• Lora Berkeley ?—I do not know that I did in dis-
tinct terms, but I gave her to understifititi as much.
When, for the first time ?—I (13 not remember any .
particular conversation till I wished her to live with
me in Park-street, about three months before I lay in.
Was that in October, 1786 ?—I think it was about
the middle of the year 1786; I dare say I could learn,
bet, as at present informed, I think it was about three
months before I lay in.
Whether Lard Berkeley came into the .country be-
fore or after your Ladyship,. .at the time of the first
marriage in March 1785?--I should think he must
. have been dime before; I only arrived the night
before. •
Had your Ladyship seen him in London within a
week before i—l should think within eight or nine
days, because we settled the plan col the marriage ; 1
undtr;tand 1 have answered the question before.
It is understood that your Ladyship has before an-
swered eenerally to about a week of your having. seen
Lord Berkeley in. London ; can your Ladyship fix
more precisely than you have already done, how near,
before your Ladyship's quitting Londoe yourself, you
has seen Lord Berkeley in Lotuton ?—No, I cannot.
How long did Lord Berkeley.eontihue with your
1 Ladyship alter the marriage r•-t Two days.
. Was it n osnore than two days ?-140, I do not
. thick it was.
What becitne of Lord Berkeley then ?—I do 'not
. know.- he left me at my lodgings in Mount-street.
. What interval of time elapsed before your Lady-
ship saw Lord Berkeley again ?—I cannot answer to
a day it tmght.bei.wo or three days or more; I' was I
very unwell, and it is such a distant period; he might '
have been gone a week from me.
Was your Ladyhip, during that week or the in-
terval your Ladyship speaks el, in lodgings by your-
yalf ?—Yes. .
Had your. Latlyop no-female attendant or friend
with you ?-eNo female - cbmpanion. but I had two
maids.
• Are either of those persons livinfd—ldo not know.
What were their names ?—I do not recollect at this

:

.•••^ll 0'

moment.
Did-those servants continue to live, with your LaJy• 1
*hip for some time ?—I was only a mouth in.Loildon
before I went to Gloucester, and then they left-me.
• Excepting those two fetnAle servants, did your La-
dyship see no female friend, or attendant, or relation,
at yoUr lodgings then ?—Nu; I do not think I did.
Is it then to be understood that your Ladyship,
during that period you were taken ill, and had no
female relation with you, that Lord Berkeley did not
visit your Ladyship or see you ?—I wish to know
whether by the word period the whole month is meant.
Your Ladyship is understood to say, that there vas
-an interval of a 'week or more, during which yobr
Ladyship did not ksinw what was become of Lord
Berkeley ?—No ; I saw nobody but the Doctor; Lord.
Berkeley did not visa me ; it was tive days sr a weekri
I do not know to a day.
At the end of that period of time, a seek or more,
iii." Lord liiirkeler visit yoF Ladyship at those lodg,
`ins ?--Yes. -
-For bow long, during your Ladyship's continuance.
• in London at that time, did liii .Vordship's visits con-
thine Cube register ?—•He came to see me when he was
in London always.. - - • ~.. :: . •
Your Ladyship was understood befdrb to have said,
that -you staid in bunion about a month after the
marriage, with the exception of the week that- has
been spoken of, did Lord li.•rketey, take his meals at'
your Ladyship's lodgings?-No, never. - .
.
.Wsis your Latlysliip ere:Ailed, to the house during i
that month ?..: !it the whole of the month.
Did your Ladyship taltsi your meals at lord-Ber...
Iteley's hosise, or any where else wheielie rasi—No,
unless I was out with iiiPri in . the country; we'some..
• times went into the country together. . - .
.
During. then the whale time of your Ladyship's.
being in London,,is it to be understood that-fear
• ' Ladys!.ip and Lord Berkeley never took any meals,
together, except when yon went into the country.—
Unless be breakfasted with she.
Did his' Lordship- in fact breakfast with your La•
,I
Alyshipl—Yes be did oecsisionally.' ...
Will your foadrship endeavour to recollect, if you
.can, whether at any time your •Ladjuhip applied to
Lord Berkeley, earnestly requesting his Lot dship to
marry you ?—No, never. . s
in the year 1796, or at any time intervening, be.:
.tweeif.:l7Bs mid 17925, did yodl,4,adyship ever make
Any such earneseentreaty.to Lord Delicacy ?—No ;
I refused so marry him a -second time frequently after
the first marriage.
D•d your Ladyship at any time express, pointing
to your Ladyship's children, that but for th:.,r ties
your Ladyship would not live with Lord livraeley
upon the footing :,:ou did, or words to that effect ?
'. . Not unless I was airsiiing to the concealment of the
first marriage.
Dues your Ladyship recollect with that reference
your Ladyship used that expression ?...Noy- 1 du not.
About what time was, the marriagepublicly made
knOwn ?-1 think I said in 1797 or 1798; I thinkoseat
was the answer I gave before. . .
Was it publicly made known till ar the death t
I
of
• the Rev. Mr. liiipiman?Yel, I this it was, bu
am iit.k certain, fur I do not know the year he died.
'The question was, Whether the first niarriage, in

_______
- :- -

March 1785, wldepliblicly Made irieoleti before or
ter the death of Mr. HuPsman ?,-e ter the death
Mr. Hupsman ; it must have been .rt,fokii death,.
Whether any settlemeet or proviiion ayeamadefor
your Ladyship heroic the first marriage ?r-1 should
think there was.
Will your Ladyship have the goodness to state
your reasons for thinking there was, and who .was
employed tin that occasion ?—1 have no perticulai
reason ; but I should thinkenty husband would have
taken care of me and my children. •
• The question meant to be put was, whether. any in-
strument of any kind, any paper, or any writing of any
sort,. to your. .Ladyship's knowledge, was executed by
Lord Berkeley prior to the marriage in March, 1785,
or for some years after, and *hen i--I never saw any
thing el his will till after Mr. Forster had made it.
Did your Ladyship see any other instrument ?
No ; 1 do not-recollect at this moment.
Or hearof any having been executedlay. his Lordship
at the time spoken of, March 1785 ?,-No ; I do not
think that I did.
Mr. Attorney-General being asked if he had any
questions to put to the Countess Dowager of Bake.
ley, said he had not.
Examined in reldy.
Your Ladyship has said-that you did not directly
tell any of your relations of your marriage with Lord'
Berkeley in the year 1785 ; whether Lord Berkeley
required your Ladyship not to tell any of your rela-
tions ?—Yes, he dld. . •
Was that the reason why your Ladyship did not
tell them ?—Certainly.
Your Ladyship has been asked respecting a con-
versation with your mother ; although your Ladyship
has ;aid that you did not in that conversation dis-
tinctly state to your mother that you were married,
did you indirectly satisfy her of the fact ?—Yes, ori
else she would not have gone to live with me.
:Was that before the birth of the claimant ?—Yes,
it was. '
Your Lady bhip has state,' that Lord Berkeley gave as
a reason why the marriage was not to be made known
the situation of your sister, Mrs. Turner ; did Mrs.
Turner in the year 1794, mai ry the Gentleman under
whose protection she had previously been, or another
Gentleman ?—I could nut answer, I know so little
of her.
Does your Ladyship know whether Mrs. Turner
lived after that respectably in the world; the ques-
tion is not as to the. name or the person•?—l have
heard m, bet I never have had any communication
with her; I have hear 4 that she is very, much respected.
• When that alteration took place in the eircum-i
stances of Mrs. Turner; was Lord Berkeley pressed ,1
to avow the marriage Z--Very strongly by my brother.
What reamn did his
,Lordship then give for further
"concealing the marriage I—The destruction of the
registry, , and the diffieulty he felt at bringing the
Clergyman to, punishment. • -
Your Ladyship hae seet•da 41* meow' diatily, after
your marriage, you, were unwell; the question is not
meant what the nature of the illness was, but whether
it was that tort of illness that you considered as dan-
gerous ?—No, I believe nor.
Althtmgh not ritngemus; was it such that in the
opinion of the medical person it was malt Lord. Berke-
lay Should cohabit with your Ladyship ?---Yes, it was,
How many tibaesdceselyotir Ladyship recollect that
you saw that medieal person cannot .answer
-at
this moment, my husband sentitim .to sod._
Your tadyship has stated that job ,severalttimet
refused to marry Lord Berkeley a eecondainte ; will
your Ladyship, state the report for shot refusal ?—I
thought. it was making it more, difficult to prove the'
first ; and it was forsaking my eldest son.
Was any date given to the marriage when it was
first announced ?—Nn, but ft was alwayseundeestood
to,be from my first living with Lord Berkeley.
. then the folloveipo question, and 'the answer on
Friday last, were zead, viz.
ig Perhaps yoer Ladyship may recollect who "ware
the sponsors to thisspgrgn,Who was,regiatered by the
name at Lord.linrsysy4—!Lie was helisiaaptized here
wilOen he was registered ; he was chriatfoed at Berke-
ley Castle afterwards„aud Lord Eustothond Colonel
Kingston were the sponsors at Berkeley Castle." '
Is there any mistake in drat answer ?.—Yes, I cer-
tainly said• Lord Ducie before ; the child was half-
baptized in London.
Your Ladyship has-said that if you had known that
Afortcri I't.thardinge Berkeley had been registered
Xl* ey,
..51191.1.14 oat have objected to it ;
wt l•-your Ladyship explain what your Ladyship
meant by that, why, ou should not have objected to
it?—There was. so.little probability drought at that
time of ever .proving the first maniage ; and your
Lordships must suppose I was .otteious at that time;
that I should be to prove sow of my children,
were legitimate.
-
. Your Ladyship had stated that yoo consulted Dir.
Bearcroft ; will.your Ladyship be pleased to recollect
whether you ever wrote to Mr. Bearcroft, or had any,
letters from him•?—f wrote to him at. Brighton, and
received an answer.
'Are those letters in existence ?—No.
Did your-Ladyship at the time of the registratiofl
know thit the claimant was registered as an
mate child. ?-e-Noi'l did net.
When slid your Ladyship first know it ?—lt must
be, I tliink, not till-after I had three children—when,
-by some means, I do not. recollect how, I had heard
mr.aacond son was c=hristened Fitzherbert instead oil
.Fitthardinge ; and•l sent to the eerbof St. George's,
I Think it was,, to desire that I might see the regis-
ters, and he hpought them to Grafton-street; and
thee, and not till then, when I saw the register I knew
it, but not -before ; and then the Clerk corrected tlie
mistake in the register ..it my second son.
. Examined by the Lords.
Does your Ladyship recollect, since you were here
last, the name of the medical person in London who
attended you there immediately after the marriage ?,
I do not think I ever heard his name.
By the question it was-meant to ask, whether your
Ladyship ever knew his name ?e- I do not think I did..
'Then her Ladyship vithdrew. •
[To be continued.] •

Saturday, C. Arortot and J. Wales:7,y were charged
at Bow-street, with bieating into the house of• Mr.
Catming, dealer in bird ia
'tht Hampstead-rtiael. On
Saturday Mr. Castang was alarmed by. the,watchntan,
Who 'fotinsi that sons; of the sliep7shuners had been
taken down, when MeXastang discovered that seve-
ralduels and pigeons had been stolen; he also feund
a knife aed some blOod at the door. A, constable
stopped ilie-prisoners at the b4ek of Gower-street the
same morning, with three ducks appareeftyjust kjlied
and five live pigeons, which Mr. CastantWore to,
and tare prisoiters *ere fully committed.
Mann; 7'..Mitthell, and J. syrnonr; Were f» lay
tominitV!d'fol• reierrafinatiem, •eba-rged 'with stealing .
gehfittity of !miring lailtpwiei, the property of Sarah.,
Craver, of 4he Horse ind'Grosen,.
eett G'arden ;.as was 4 clerk to Messrs:Or:amine)?
and Dence, envy agents, for embeizlinglic 192; 16s.
reeeiveS for the use oPlhe-N;Atf Office. • • • • .1
The long train of Pashionables, and the' brilliant
display of beauty, that honoured RanelagN Milbank;
on Thursday last„ with their. Presence,..llves a 'CAl-
vineing proof of the increasing popularity of thil fa-
vorite fair of pleasure ; nor is this to be wondered at,,{
while pleasing thriety, good aeconimodaeton‘•and
strict demure% fora itn alliance to promote the.
amusement of a discerninw public. The preparations
for the forthcoming fete 'to.nioreow use said to beat •
the most extensive and iplendtd description.
Beautitia White leech may besegarded ns one•of,
the greatest bless...rags Prevideneekanhestow, without
which the finest formed face is imperfect; inattention;
Ai the teeth and gums iwche• principal cause-of an
offensive breath.— Bure.Wit VsGeriktflut R metre
rive Totem POWDZit is a most elegant and certain.
remedy for all diseases of the teeth. and gums ; its
particular qualities are not simply confined to clean-
sing the teeth, hut will preserve them in the highest
state of perfection; it will .render them .beautifully
white, fasten sit( h as may be loose, and restore them
to their original patio', entirely eradicate the scurvy
in the gums, cat** them to adhere close tind firm to
the . teeth, render them of a healthful real,• and the,
breath delicately sweet, relieve and •cure the most
excruciating tooth-tacit, gym-biles, and swelled face.
—sold wholesale and retail at Mr. Butler's, 4, Cheap.
side, corner of Paternoster-row; and retail by Belam
and Sheep:Portsmouth; Mall and Johnson, Gosport ;„
A Smut,. Weston, Mallory and Jones, Portsea ; 'new-
Eaceser, ; Cookworthy, Glenville. Gilbert and
iipxla ad, Plymouth.; Newbury, Dublin; Baxter and,'
*Donald, Glasgow ; Smith; Manderston, Scott and
Cacgil, Edinburgh ; Crutwell, Bath ; Ross and Peck,l
Hull ; Gregson and `Billinge, Liverpool ; Stains and
Lynch, Manchester ; Bowen, Norwich ; Knott and
Birmingham ; Gregory, Brighten ; and most
I,4edisiae Venders, in Boxes .2s. 9d. each.

MARRIED.
Rev. John Warren, of Ottery St. Mary, Devonshire; t-t Fran-
ces, only Daughter of Mr— Hicks of St. David's Hill, Exeter.

At the close of the Poll for Sheriffs on Saturday, the
numbers were, for
Mr. Ald. Birch • 1274 Mr. Aid. MeVhlY
Heygare • 618 lirklipo.
.12 40.
• 90i

:

.

. . . ,
^x 7, l'...!,e^i;ritiali.tattlaluida ' • ' a•'• ' 1, f. * I tgrOltboltriactB.' '
•••••••10
ri,...i.:,,,.:, Ai', -ThLLIGENC I. ' .
..
Tuesdati;Ote Governors Of the Radclife Infirmary
t;_, . ... .. ,
. dOClitPrr, WHITEHAIA TUNE 29. •
',
it h..,
, Trau,Christiaa, Rutter ipasVire--71:leis Papeuhurgli , assembled as .usual, With the .Vice-Chancellor and
zusee: 1, With a cargo of sugar dlogwootte was seized Heads of Haws, at the P.adcliffe Library, and pi it •
Jo the Ems by_the.gurobrigs anion and:iliaeeroed ceeded theace to St. Mary's church, where ,inarzel-
i I ht to Prrmoutla. Tlv igh Court, of l'idmi-_leot•Seintim•was pruihed by the Rev. Joseph Att-
,
,eondemned the vessel •and cargo ;read their well Small, D. 1). Prebendaryof Gloucester. Beforeordillips directed further proof.
.• ' the' Seri:eon, lull choir service was performed, in
' Recovery, .Conneli„naotii.,-This ves-sel, under which as' 'ere introdeced. the old him.lr ieith psalm,
and
American colours, laden with curtain, pot-ash, and lan anthem by Ilatlt.4—.“ Whets the ear heard."
tobacco, from New York to St. Sebastian's, was.c4P- , The collection amounted to .4 tel. itis. 10d. The
tuned by the Medusa.frigate, and brought to Ply- I Governors dined together at the Star Inn, and ap.
Mouth. The High Ceqrt of Admiralty condemned the ;•ointed F. S. L. Wheate, F....q. and J. H. Tilson, Lsq.
cargo ; and their Lordships affirmed the sentence, stewards for the year epsuing. . .
-COURT OFAING'S BENCH, •JUNE SAL WiintSJay, was celebrated in the Theatre, Lord
.Cre4ve's annual Commemoration .of Founders and
SELLING Gt.I'NEAs.—.THE KING V. DE VONGE.
Benefactors of the University ; when the Honorary
This case being called on in tire order'in which it
stood in the Paper, Mr. Gaenow saidit
Degrees of Doctor of Civil Law were conferred on
good in the
Exchequer Chamber for judgment. the Right Hon. George Knol, soli of Llrd.Viicount
Northland ;. and on Mileson Eigar, Esq. hosts pre-
the Eta.a.4mottoucti.—,i We *shall cormilunicate
the judgment of the Court in this case in the course of I sewed by the Rev. Dr: Lawireace t elett the donor:try
the present month " . D•.‘gree of Master 'of Arts en George Page, Esq.
Gentleman Commend . of W.illiton colleg.t, presented
. . THE KING V. THOMAS WIPE.
by the Rev. G. Rogers, M.A. fetlow of th a. sodiety.
The Defendant having'been convicted of a Libel
upon Mr. Peck, the Mayer of Norwich, was this day The Prize Coniposititus. were recited by the gen-
,
tiernen to. whom tilicy lie.d been adjtitigei, viz.
rhe Herculaiieuni,,. by Mr. Hughes, of Oriel
brought up for Judgment. He produced an affidavit
of Tames Marsh, Esq. one of the Magistrates of the conege. °I Verbe' ,
1 Csty of Norwich, which, notwithstanding the advice The En;lish F.ssay, a Fulieral and Sepulchral Honours," by
of the Court, lie persisted in having read ; but the Mr.*Antielcis B. A. of Oriel ccillsge.
was to _ English Vcroo—Sir RoyreNewd-gate's Palo, '' The P.inthe-
Court thought the best they could do for hill;
&spa," by Mr. Bunion, at Oriel a,B, wt.
foret they had heard it. The sentence of the Court .1
Lade Lisa!, " De :•tyli Ciceroni:int in &sem outset vat-ie.
wes, that the Defendant be imprisoned in the King's tate," by Mr. CP.ariestitathiire, B.A. of Christ Church:
Bench Prison for Three Months, and do then enter 1 FAX iritsi AinicAt. PitemnTiciss.
into recognizances to keep the .peace for three years,l Rev. Beim Broughton'. M.A. FeStow of ran. Coßege, in this
himself in sC3OO,' and two sureties in £lOO each. i 'leave, ety, to the rectory of Lung 0111013, -urrey, 00 the pre-
THE KWG V. SEM EY AND OTHERS! I senta:io:. of the Warden and Fidlow.‘ of that Society.
1 Ike.. William Pare Itichards,'LL B. Fellow of New College,
Mr. GEENEY
,applied to the Court on behalf of a g to this University, to the recto'', of Abbotetoke, Doriet, on we
person. named Rierrulf, indicted with others for conspi- ' preset tarion -et the Warden and Fakirs of that Socitity4
rin defraud the Marquis of Headier* end, which Rev. F. Barnaby, B.D. Fellow a Brasanose College, in this
tog. University,
roe to
Wafer,ibe rectory of bast Loath, Worearersi.i.d
re, and,f
indictment stands for trial at the Sittings 'efter this .i..,}.,,-tordahl vacant by the resignation of m
Term. The application was, that Rierrulf or his So- ktv. J. wal re.
.
licitor should have access to certtin papers found in At a .Cetwral Ortlisation holden by the 'l.ced Bi-
shop of Norwich, :rirelea-C.a. thedrala on Sunday last,
•the possession of: the other defendant Sedley, when
he was apprehended. • • the following gentlemen were orda;ned : .
The Court desired to k-now 'what the papers were . "'Gloms.
which the defendant wiehed to have Recess to ? Thomas J. Abbott, setobt: of Catliwine-hall, Cambridge.
Mr. Gustmiy answered, that his client wanted eft- !:___. A. Dray all Itlii,er.:slPj,spt:'ol3ttlif-;.,%.Culicges "winidg'"
tain letters which Kierrelf had written m Sedley, as -1,
GI. rivrarr'r(A.B. Triiii‘v Collett, Casubkdge.
they were considered to be necessary to Kierruli's de- George Hike and James Rolle, B.A. St. Jolio's Colt. caatbridae.
fence on the trial. • - _ • Geese Heatnate, A.M. Woreewer College, Oxford.
Mr. .Gannow submitted, that letters, AvrittenThy R. T. Ntee.ec, p.n. of Cai us College, Cu:bruit' ...
one defendant to another, could not be matter of evi., Jam" Taw"'
Bence ; besides, it did not appear that any application
had been made, either to the Secretary of. State, in
whose hands they are deposited for certain eery -i.eimie,
some reasons, or yet to Mr. Hicks, the Magistrate,
I and that they were refused. .
Lord EeteNsonotroit uknerOcd, that it -woe ld have
been quite thug enough for this appbcatien to have
been made, W those in whose ,ceitinlrtheilotPertwere
deposited had refused to permit any access to them
by accredited agents.. As that dia not appear; the
'Rule must be denied. . • ,
Mr. GUttNEY took nothing for his motion. . •

_ _
TRtrs7ll
Wm. R. townie, A.M.lll4rhehal College, Aberdeei.
Jam thick, A.B, CbrM Cantbri4ge._
'Robert Netts; A.B. Clare Hall, Cvibiiilg..
Day, 4.4 late Fellow (if Magdalen College, Cambridge.
Arthur Ethel A.M. St. Mars's College-, Sr. A Vreves:
tingb Cbarleall'are, of 'lt;Wily Hall, Cantbehige.
George limn Holley, A.B. ht. loktr's collegeoCantbridge.
Charles 'grates, A.B. Magdalen:CuLlege, Canibritlge,
Henry North-, LU. Ci'us Colt.gr, Canibridr.
Wee. Rec.; Strident cf Jesus Colktv, Oitcnte.
•
Wm. Robbins, A.B. Si. ItAmitiati Hatt, Oxfurd.
Xdvititett Iti4ter.Tbuinl„Aell. Sidtscy College, Canabritlym

• t• ' A CAPE) TO TITS FIDAPALE SEX. •
D', BOTH ERG I L L's j tutly-citihr:tet, Female
Ow WlT...rent complaints ineiclerie to the'Sei at v...
Alons„perio..l4 of lift. it has his truly ..,bscrved, that Weasel.'
tons*. thasivlse other sea, may be cowstiLred in a certain iliegreetts
invalid, ; they are subjected to a variety of dis.:vses,from the na-
-1 itive of the functior.s they arc dc..tlned, .sir. mothers, to *font ;
tiiist upon them WYlknes.,ipatn, and en idterruption of
j.th.entreicular fractions connected with -the lull enloytwent'uf
health. No act on •the corwititatimi of the tontile and.rebove
obstruction, no remedy has been knows t 4 to with such cox-
tainty, (inkiness, and safety, as 1)r. Fotheiti,ill's Female Pills-v-it
writes h.e,, ionte and invigorating powrrs, Witfit Its pteular qua-
lity of relieving fellness, oppression, aial these other uneasy ssym;,..
toms which arise from.too much blood in the laCtit ; they are the
• most certain cure for nervous, hysteric. tind ilatulemt.complaint.,
as well as the various other spasmodic allfeCtions so c~rtet.:t to
the sex. Or. Pottle. gars NU, as a (amity rneacine;shoalti be
pettaision cif every mother and other guardian's-Ville young, wino
lemakesitstrutted teettleir care.
Sold whole.* and retail at Mr. itickit's, 4, Chespside, corner
a Paterit lstect row ;'Bauer and C... aaa Smith, Cargill. and N:sn-
derston,-Edinburgti 'Baste'r and tAttoild, ; lhtvtand,
Granittile and Son, (Nilson, find lisplott, Plymouth ; Newberry
and Son, Dublin ; sack end Turner; Hull; Malory, Album, and
Jones. Portsta • ,Sbatp, .Porismotub; Joigett, lauetwa; firew-
Man, Exeter rains, Bath; Brown, Bristol; and
mast Booksellers is er.ltyiown, bract, at es. ed. and
Alto, Bet Lett's AROMATIC VECTORAL LOZINGES, rot im-
proving „the votte, and for coughs,: colds, asthmas, and consump-
tions, in hove. at 1344. each.

MESSRS. CUR ItIE and Co. autgenns, late in his
Majesty's Service, challenge the whole world tO prove a
single instance where their Nledicinsi and method of cure have
fasted of the desired effect. The practice of .many years in ties
Follicular branch of their profession has not given rise to use
onstecenfel case. • •
r 'foxy continue to ditvet their sittelimeo the treatment and cure
Veri•real Complaint*, and that derangement of the system,
which is ;he consezience aft he pernicious and wasteful effects at a
habit long and indft tedioputiy p tirsuei by the youths of both nuts
in the one it will be Genid to be the unfailing soiree of harren-
ness ; the other have its ravages fatallrideveloped to them by a eh 4-
creasing state of debility, which,if tint timely remedies', terminstes
iu impotence. These are its remote mil Ulthnate titres, while eon-
sumptions, loss of inuetnlar power, and vadon• nervous cumrlalers
usually tii.ractorise the carte; stages of thissslitary vice. Of per.
sons languishing under the disorders incident to wilt a habit, ea :r
treatment is simple and has _never proved unsuccessful, in rho
coarse of a long, laborious, and much extended practice. in the
most obstinate and complicated cases of venereal infeetiot% b
as obstructions in .tlie• urethra, stogy tiitiViCereet, hard
Mours,eallous Witte, eruption,', seminal weakness,
gkrts, at ,tea
Whether recent or of long duration, and which have baffled the
all oftather Practitioners ; ar. 'by their present improved pbu
Siratmen t, effectually and peetssaneed)cere4, without the patient
suffer!ng the victualed:lg path •and alarming hemorrhage which
r often follows the application of the lunar csust;c. In the cleric el
40 eeatilexaensive practice In this siictropolis, nuineraus c.oes of
I Strictures here -been and are daily under their are, the to! 11
7nidicatinn of which are effected•by a safe, certain, and
eterli-
, moths mode of prootice, superior to any other yet aolopteit. •10,
weakness, atelsichhity proceeding front this c,mplai,r,
'is removed: an,t the peteut restored to souni ar.J
veins health. But whet.... the delitity bas for years exisied, s
proper perseverance ha their renorative remedies, after the Art c•
titre hat been destroyed, is indispeirably riquistte•to revere Or
slumbering sparks of life, and to reale:nate the Constitution.
Several Noblemen and Gentlemen, of the first respectaNh7,
have been under the are of Messrs. (,'gene and CO. fur the t •
nioval of complaints of the Urethra, Strictures, fee. and, hat
received a radical and permanent pre, retrtest that tsferecc
may be msdra,to thenimsatisfacenry evident.' of the.decids,i ,i•
sert ority to Merits. Currie 21141-e0:1 plan nt trearm.nhit
t these ttcntienien have lad Strictures front ;co to twenty y
and had been undo' the care of Adessei. Honte and Hele:!..4
and other surgeons of equal eminence, who attempted the
by the application of the lunar caustic, without success.
Messrs. Currie and Co. may be consulted liy tithe; sat wit' "to
greatest delicacy, secrecy, and homier, at their ht.use,
Hattun-Gatden. Pat/elmin the country are requested to
the particulars of tietir case. iitt, and general habit of 'Me , Iko
inclorins,a remittance for advice cad medicine% when the siti
iion he Mien or tent to any part of theklurAtn•
• • __ _ _
12100;

----- . _______
DIED •
June 19, aged 47, the Rev. M. Slack, vicar of All Saints, Sul-
bury, Suffolk.
how 21, thy Rev. Lotter Allen, rector of Easton and vicar
of Peastastien, sufhlk.
June 22, aged.fid, the Rev. Henry Caminito, seem of *Ming.
ford, Norfolk, and vicar of St.•Stroben's, Norwich.
Riv. Clearent John Wsiey, rector of South Shocbury, Ease:,
and of Ulcomh, Kent. „.
Rev. Thomas Pry Lewis, aged 411,:of Curry Malll.l,.Sruner. ...._.
~
--_—. '----........—;-----=--•-•'---7,
setabire, and one of the llaciattatia fiartitat.ocunty. ' 1 ko,
.1.0 . printed ityl putadard by Lav as. K tae, at the •bei".`
• It"' "413/Psel 'mai. 61181jaii4"' Culithediade aged 71. Or rtes I - N.l 9 Caterdan.ty sad at tbe °lfill. Ism*
s.
.------
~.;...................—__ -