The Sun.
London, England, 1844-11-22 00:00:00

VICE-CHANCERY.--(THIS DAY.)

(Before Sir K. BRUCE.)
CRAIWE V. LAMBE-JUDGMENT.

(Before Sir J. WIGRAM.)
MALLALIEU V. MILLER.
This case, which has been already before the Court,
was again brought before his Honour this mornit?g•
It came on on further directions and costs, and equity
reserved upon the alleged lien of the plaintiff Malin-
lieu, who is a factor residing in Manchester, on the
goods of Copeland and Duncan, late shipping agents
of Liverpool, who had become bankrupt in the
end of 1836. The alleged lien on the bankrupts Pro-
perty arose out of a balance of cash due in the ora.
nary course of business by the bankrupts to Alallab!u*
The arguments upon the affidavits and evidence, which
were exceedingly voluminous, engaged the Court the
Qntire day. latter

QUEEN'S BENCII.-(THIS DAY.)

(Sittings in Banco.)
The Court heard motions to-day. No case of lm"
portance came before the Court up to the hour tbs'
we went to press. During the course of the morn/
the Middlesex Grand Jury came into Court, all
having been thanked by Mr. Justice Williams f°t
their services, were discharged.

BAIL COURT.-(THIS DAY.)
THE QUEEN V. THE GUARDIANS OF THE TOTM

UNION.
Mr. GREENWOOD moved for a mandamus to compel
the guardians to give relief without the workhouse r
a poor person named Penning. An order was made
by two magistrates, in pursuance of the 27th sec. °
the Poor-law Amendment Act, for out-door relief t°
the poor person, who was unable to work. There
was a difference of opinion amongst the guardians 35
to the propriety of complying with the order, but
upon a motion made by Sir J. T. Bulleran, ex-,46e1e
guardian, that the order be complied with, it wes,ue
tided that the pauper ought not to have out-door relief.
—Application granted.

MARY ELIZABETH SMITH V. EARL FERRABS.
111 r. BUTT moved for a rule to show cause why the
rule for changing the venue in this case should not be
discharged, and why the venue should not be changed
frou.‘ Warwickshire to London. This was an act%
brought by the next of kin to the plaintiff for breach
of promise of marriage, to which there were two plea
pleaded non assumset and infancy. The cause It
removed on the usual affidavit to Warwickshire. t
wasl stated that the defendant was a person of gre6,,e
influence in Warwickshire, and that the jurors th,,e`e
would be guided by the influence of his family. 1$
defendant had, moreover, married Augusta Arebe,,
Chichester, whose family had likewise great ini'b";
ence in Warwickshire. The plaintiff stated that 5 a
intended to have the cause tried by a special jury, ,'lrl
that an impartial jury could be obtained in Londe
She also stated that she believed several witneoets
would be called who would speak to important fs;
which occurred immediately without the el,,
boundary.—Rule granted.
01
THE QUEEN V. THE VICAR AND CHURCHWARDEN-

ST. STEPHEN'S, CITY.
Mr. PASHLEIGH moved for a mandamus to COn.l;
mand the vicar and churchwardens of St. Stepheoof
Coleman-street, to call a vestry, for the purpose , •
electing an organist to the parish. It appeared thisto
committee had been appointed to decide on the merit.
of candidates for the office, and they selected six Pe
sous. sous. A meeting was called to elect one of the six:ie,
which Miss Macrane, who was not one of the six,,er
manded a poll. They granted a poll, but refused
votes. This was the reason of the present oPP
cation.

Mr. Justice PATTESON said that an organist ris's
not an officer.
Mr. PASEILEIGIT said that a rate made for an orgill'is
was legal.
Mr. Justice PATTESON doubted it. •
Mr. PASILLEIGH said it appeared, from " 130111:
Abridgment," that the parish might levy a rate ,r
the ormaaments of the church.
Mr. Justice PATTESON-All organist is 110 °P
nament. —(Laughter.)
Mr. P, I.BIILhIGH referred to other authorities. the
Mr. Ja.stice PATTESON took time to consider
matter.

COMMON PLEAS.—(THIS DAl(')
iIARRISSON V. lIABRISSON.
This was. a case concerning a will, which occuPi,,ed,
the Court newly the whole of the morning, but t"t
arguments wure entirely technical, and of no inter
whatever.

WILLET V. WELLS. 01
Mr. Sergwnt WILD requested that judgineo(
might be given in this case before the expiratinie
this term as one of the parties was ill and might
1 )efore next term.
teP
_Nothing more of any importance had been done at
minutes past two o'clock, when the Court role.

GUILDHALL,—(THIS DAY.)
Two young men, named Johnstone and Synith, `ll- pro
1
ch arged with having stolen a gold watch and
the property of Bernard Trainer, a traveller.. Tohnstone was brought up on Wedn.esday, snuiea
rem anded uutil to-day, that Smith might be t°
into custody, in the meantime.
Bernard Trair.er said he lived at No, 64,
street, On Saturday
he met two friends and
proceeded tc) the Parr's Head public-house, in ~11°e
gate -street, to have something to drink. lie OTio
little in licit tor. Tie and a person named Collage.'he
span., pd for some time. Previous to their fighttna,
took ,)ut hit ; watch and chain, and gave it to a P` the
named St. Ledger, to hold. St. Ledger puct. to
watch on the mantel-shelf, and when they le" be
house they left it there by mistake. On Sundeirbo
went to the public-house to get the watch, Ivar
Johnstone, who was potman at the public-house) to
vied all knocavledge of it. Smith was a lodger At
house.
illar:y Wood, the servant a: the public-house, 5
Johnst )ne with a gold watch at-.ld chain in his Pher
se,sion. fie told her that if Anybody asked '5O
about it, P.,he was to say nothing. he afterwardis„,soot
that he. 'aad sold it to Smith for 21. She eetnod,
swear that the watch produced was the one be
but it much resembled it. 41,
Smi ,th pledged the watch at Mr. Newby'S,
Drur) r-lane, for 51., and the chain for 30s.—T P
soners, were fully committed for trial.

CIERKENWELL.—(THIS DA/')•
-,Four well-dressed young men, named Negur,
kaid, Wakely, and Hoskins, were charged ' re'
creating a disturbance in Gray's Inn-lane on the Foos
vious night. They described themselves by vat the
designations. Negus had stated that he W°s 1,0
Turkish Ambassador, but they all turned out to
nothing more or less- than twopenny-postmen. ,era
Police-constables 144, 165, 65, and 48 "bsve
enpeavouring to disperse a mob in Gray's vP
o.n the previous nigl it, when the prisoners ea`l.,iegi.l6
an told them the had no business there- 'rped
said he was the Turkish Ambassador, w,„ 7,deo•
them .against interforing with him or his 00113't the
They then commenced hallooing and shouting tntls,
top of the.;r voices, so as to disturb the inhati-
Hoskins said he was a City policeman All the raw
goners, except England, were very violent stnci the
orderly. They wet e ultimately conveyed °scope'
station-house, after snore than one attempt to untie'
Negus—The ce treated me in a most
coming and improper manner. ter Of
Mr. Comuh—lncousistent with your charac

Turkish Ambassador. tr
Martin, 144 G, said that Negus had on a grin
ano
c np, with a great. red tassel suspended fr°lll
ii Petted the greatest importance. e %cel;4
Mr. CoMBB fined all the prisoners ss. each,
E olgland. t,„ Cow'
.Nagus paid the money, put on hia bat in t"-
an a struttQd off with an air of great importance'

The question in this case is one of right construc-
tion of the terms of a will made by Mr. James Grice
who after giving several legacies, gave and bequeathed
all the remainder of his real and personal es-
tate, of whatsoever the same might consiit,
unto and equally between and among all
his relations who might claim and prole
their affinity to him by lineal descent, the property
to be divided share and share alike. The will was
dated the 18th of February, 1837, and the testator
died the 22d of the same month, a widower, And
without issue.

His HONOUR gave judgment in the case this morn-
ing; after going at great length into the facts and
circumstances of the case, he said he must not
be understood as giving any opinion rs to
whether the word " relatives " comprehended pas"s
connected by marriage to another, and not by kindred
of blood. The Master had found that the parties
entitled were the relations by kindred, and he
confirm that finding ; the property in dispute would,
therefore, go to the next of kin, and not to the he'
at-law. should