The Sun.
London, England, 1850-07-10 00:00:00

BIRTHS IN THE WEEK.

Mules ... ... ... ... ... 640
Females ... ... ... ... ... 607

Total ... 1,247
sln this number are included 20 by Scarlatina, 35
by Typhus Fever, 40 by Dic.rrhcea, and 1 by Cholera.

CITY OF GLASGOW BANKING COMPANY.—This
banking establishment held'their annual meeting on Thurs-
day. The report entered fully into the transactions of the
company for the last year, and declared the usual dividend
of six per cent. The rest now amounts to upwards of
120,0004

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

HOUSE OF LORDS, July 9.

The Earl of MALMESBURY presented petitions
from Ilfracombe and from 11oniton in favour of au alte-
ration in the law of parochial settlementv.
Petitions were presented in favour of a Ten Hours'
Factory Bill, by Lord Beaumont from Manchester, and
by the Bishop of Oxford trims Rochdale and various
other places in Lancashire; by Lord Brougham, from
Ashton, and by Lord Beaumont, fr,m Great Yarmouth,
in fav,ur of they County Court., MD.

The report o 1 the Manchester Rectory Bill was
brought up by ti.• Earl of Sr. GERMANS. It was
understood that the Committee had decided against the
1311 ou the ground that it should be a public and not a
private measure.
A brief discussion then took place in which the Bishop
of MANCHESTER, the Earl of POWIS, and other Noble
Lords took part, and the sulij-et then dropped.i
The Earl of WILTON presented several petitions
from places in Lancashire, praying that the House would
not piss any measure infringing on the principle of the
Ten Hours Act.
The Earl of LONSDALE presented petitions from
Barnstaple and Lityn, c implaining of the powers vested
in the Hoard of

Lord BROUGHAM presented a petition from Old-
ham in favour of an efficient Ten Hours Bill; also se-
veral petitions from Aberdeen and other towns in Scot-
land in favour of the Bill for the removal of obstructions
in the corn trade; also a petition from Ashton Keys,
c
i-
)betd
rAhoireedeeneaty3nrir'
mehl;gydap,adtlf:irribli
o() remrn:adienicleso' Irtkbatteeaatt
beyond
extension
Cs
d:Ohni ratasic:Oisonftitni
l'isfilgtai:nismdeeeedmpdjr
Trea;euia:nsr:oitteis.nifddQe
They
imprisoned tenii)hytoeiheneti I:esnfoeQobi county
tie ;drnvi
of the length of time
d
e
Prison in Seuthwark, complaining
had appliel
for an interim order. They must ba considered either
as having money and having refused to pay the legiti-
mateto allow inquiries claims°n th
them,
be . fjri
havingnasstitnted into
io theirmpr po improperly declined
The report on the Benefices in Plurality Bill was
agreed to with certain amf niments.
The Earl of RODEN presented a petition from the
working classes of Birmingham, signed by upwards of
4,000 individuals. against Sunday labour in the Pee:-
office; also a eetition to the same effect from Dablie,
signed by 6,500 persons, among whom were limey of the
most resp,e)table iehebitants of that city ; betel also a
vast number of similar petitions from various portions of
the United Kingdom.
On the motion of the Marquis of LANSDOWNE, the
Commons' amendments of the Lords' amendments in die
,Drainage and Improvement of Lind Advances Bill, were
ugreed to.
PARLIAMENTARY VOTERS (IRELAND) BILL.
The Marquis of L NSDO W NE, in moving the adop-
tion of the re2ort on the Parliamentary Voters (Ireland)
Bill, stated that he did not then mean to move any altt-
retion of the amendments which had been introduced
into the measure by their Lordships in Committee.
He thought it desirable that the amendments should
be printed, and that they should atterwarde be con-
sidered on the third rea ling. L was proposed to carry
out the measure so as to have it come int) opt-ration
ion the summer of -1852. In conclusion, he thought the
moat convenient coarse which their Lordships
could then adopt ua4 to have all the amendments which
had been proposed incorporated with the Bill, and to
have the Bill reprinted, and they could be fully cen-
sielered on the third reading of the Bill, which he in-
ided to fix for next Friday. He hoped the report
we uld then be agreed to.
A. long and desultory conversation here ensued on
v arious details of the Bill, aid severel suggest. d ai-
cFtional amendments, in which L ird Redesdale, Earl
'Grey, the Mtrvie of Laeedowne, Leril Menteagle, the
Earl t f Gleoged, Lerd Ciarine, Sce , took part.
Tee report eels then receiv d, and the third reading
xed for Filly.
:reading of this 11:11, which teel for its ohj ,et the affed-
The
mEetrqL,E3iCs roic()LNAsscsmi
(E) Lmm)
oßvleld.L.
the
second
:tog greater facilities to the conduct of el. etiorie in
One of its miiu features was the establishment of
:Ada itional polling plrlees.
The Earl of S I'. GER-11ANS wes understood no to
ct to the principle of the 13111, but thought its Par-
ititieneetary leneth was more than need Le.
The Rut' of mouNrcAsnELL said he would not
•oppete the prop.)sed mea-ure, ho thought it would be
: rather an improvement than otherwise, upon the present
:system. There sere various amendments which he in-
itc "(4 introducing into the Bib in Committee. One
w as to tte effect :hat any religious pereen interf:qing
in
en election, whether in the ceercioa or restraint of a
voter C,1130 t pull, should tie guilty of a m;sdc-
no:r. a
clauses,
of
Therewer e some ether atneielmente in detail
in. sa v
which he gave notice of his int'4n-
tion introduce.

EVENING, JULY 10, 1850.

Aftfr Ltv Lard i:SONTEAG
•

Efal Cif GLENGALL: 1.3:11 F: J 3 read a 3.2e',3:1(1
and ori7ervd underitos.4l) to be c;.,,en-dt:ctl
Tht.r.4=.l next.
LIVERPOOL WATEIZWORIC:2I BILL
The Earl of-LIAR:110 \V By p;;-:t ;3. I.w.ition fiord
LivPrpoil compluitdo; tlibt eectai,. Tarepayers tti t.f:e
nnuabur of 50,000, had praytd t
mittee of their Lord hips
had been refused.

The E3rl of LIARDSVICKE &fended the condo&
of the Committee, and said that afrtn- an attet,ti.ve ex-
amination of itte ;acts of the case,, they h?.d came !o the
conclusion that it was Wterly impossible to receive the
petition in question as that of the ratepayers of Liver-
pool.