The Sun.
London, England, 1850-03-28 00:00:00

WRITE HART HOTEL, LEICESTER.
F. BARNARD, formerly of the Essex Arms Hotel, Wat-
ford, and subsequently of the White Hart Hotel, I dgbeth,
ham, takes leave to return his sincere and grateful acknowledgments
for the kind support and patronage he has experienced from com-
rnercial and other friends in the above hou ess, and
khene avails himself
W this opportunity of informing them, he has ta and
nPost the White Hart llotel, Leicester, and assure., those gentlemen
'who have so numerously visited that Old Established Hotel, and
thorn he hopes may now honour him with their favours, that it will
be kis unceasing endeavour to pursue the same system of manage.
Ment as herettiforo, with a dee regard to choice Wines and Spirits.

Fit AUDS AND COUNT ER EITS:.
BURGESNCLAT S'S ESSENCE of ANCHOVIES
[IN CHAJ—" Burgess v. Collins," and "Burgess
Ball"
On thelth of March, 1850, his Honour Vice-Chancellor Sir J. L.
knight Bruce granted an INJUNCTION to restrain John Collins,
of tlehmond-row, Liverpool, from manufacturing any sauce or corn-
Delltion purporting to be " Targets's Essence of Anchovies," er so
contrived or expressed as to represent that the sauce or composition
Inemulactured and sold, or exported, is the same as the essence of
anchovies manufactured by John Burgess and Son. And on the 14th
of March, 1850, his lloneur Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce granted
Another injunction to retrain Triel Ball, of 3, Satchvrell-ts,
Bethnal-green-road, London, from Neill ng any sauce er composition
described as or purporting to he " Burgess's Essence of tnchovies."
And notice is hereby given, that proceedings will be immediately
taken against all other person• manufacturing and vending or ex-
renting essence of anchovies in bottles labelled in a similar manner
to the bottle% in which the genuine essence of anchovies teanufac-
tared by John Barge's and Sonis
labelled or labelled In any manner
calculated to induce the public to believe that such spurious
essence is the genuins essence of anchovies manufactured by
John Burgess and Son, of 107, Strand, London.
THOMAS PRYER, Solicitor to the Plaintiff.
11, Artillery-place, Finsbury-square, London.

A RGUS LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY,
39, THROGMORTON-STREET, BANK;
LA,
And 14, PALL-MALL.
Chalrmax—The Right Bon. the LORD MAYOR.
Deputy-Chairman—WlLLlAM LEAF. E
Ald.. M.P.
sq.
Richard E. Arden, Esq. IJ. llumphery, Esq.,
Banbury, Esq. IKupert Ingleloy, Esq.
William
Edward Bates, Esq. Thomas Kelly, Esq., Aldermaa.
—__ !Jeremiah Filcher, Esq.

Thomas Camplin, Esq.
!Lewis
James Cl Esq. Pocock, 1:511.
AUDlTOlRD—Professor Hall, M.A.; J. B. Shuttleworth, Esq.
Pnrsiciart—Dr. Jcatfreson, 2 Finsbury-square.
Jewry.
SusnroN—W. Coulson, Esq., 2e Frederick's-place, Old
CosisuLTlNo ACTUlZT—Professor 11111, M.A., of King's College.
STANDING COUNSEL—Sir John Rotnllly, MP., Solicltor-General.
SOLlClTol—Willlain Fisher, Esq., lb, Doughty-street.
ADVANTAGES OF ASSURING WITH THIS COMPANY.
In addition to a large subscribed capital, Policy holders have the
security of an Asurance Fund ef more than a Quarter of a
Million, and an annuals Income approaching 70,0001. a year, arising
from the issue of 6,500 Policies.
BONUS, OR PROFIT BRANCH.
Persons Assuring on the Bonus system will be annually entitled
to IA) per cent. of the proflts en this branch (after payment of five
Yearly Premiums) ; anti the profit assigned to each Policy may be
either added to tks sum assured, •r applied in reduction of the An-
nual premium
NO!(-BONUS, OR LOW PREMIUM BRANCH.
The Tables on the non-participating principle afford peculiar ad-
The
to the assured, not offered by any other Ofnce—for where
the object Is the least possible outlay, the payment of a certain sant
is secured is the Policy-holder, on the death of the Assured, at a re-
duced rats et Premium.

One L ear. ISeve■ Years.

X 0 17 8 £0 19 1
7
111 1 2
Ibo 1 9
114 1 119 10
32 4 317 0