The Sun.
London, England, 1850-01-31 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, Jan. 30.
(Before the CHIEF CommissioNru.)

IN THE MATTER OF THE HON. ADOLPHUS FREDERICK

CHARLES BIOLYNEUX CAPEL.

In July last the insolvent applied to this Court for
protection. His petition was refused. He had re-
sided at Theyden• House, Epping, and contracted
debts and liabilities to the amount of 32,0001. He
had no assets, but it was said that, out of court, an
offer of 2s. 6d. in the pound, proposed to be raised by
means of friends, had been refused by the creditors.
A few weeks since an affidavit was presented to the
Court, setting forth that he had been residing for
some time at No. 4, Wilton-street, Grosvenor-
square, unmolested by his creditors, and praying that
he might be heard under the 28th section, on an ap-
plication for a final protecting order. The prayer
was granted, and he now came up accordingly.
Mr. Nicholls (with whom was Mr. Sturgeon) sup-
ported ; Mr. Dowse and Mr. Sargood appeared on
behalf of a number of creditors ; Mr. Bagley opposed
on behalf of Mrs. Woodhouse, of Toxteth-park, near
Liverpool, a creditor for 4,0001. ,
The insolvent was examined by Mr. Dowse, and
said he had been residing at the house of Mr. John
Joseph Jowett, who was a creditor for 5681., on ac-
count of which he held bills of exchange. After a
stay of eight days at Mr. Jowett's, he went by an
early morning train for Dover en route to
France. He stopped at an hotel at. Calais a
few days ; then at an hotel at Boulogne
for about six weeks ; then at an hotel,
and with his sister 'at her residence at Paris.
He returned to England a little before the middle of
November. During that time he visited England
twice, once in July, and the other time in October.
On the occasion of the first visit he arrived in Dover
on a Saturday morning, went to Brighton that after-
noon, and left Brighton on Monday night.
When at Brighton,i he stopped at the Bedford
Hotel. On the second visit he came over to
Folkestone on a Sunday morning. The first
visit was on pleasure, the second on business.
When he returned to England in November he
went direct from the railway station to lodg-
ings at Mrs. Andrews's, No. 4, Wilton-street.
He had resided before at 4, Wilton-street, and been
known by the name of Mr. Cuthbert. On this oc-
casion he took lodgings in hit own name. He had
resided and slept there ever since, except a few days
when he had been •out visiting. He had never
given instructions to Mrs. Andrews to deny him.
Thomas Clarke, of Museum-street, Bloomsbury,
said he was a process-server, and after having made
fruitless inquiries at 86, Ebury-street and in Bond-
street, he inquired at No. 4, Wilton-street, and
was told that Mr. Capel was not known there.
About a week since he applied at Mr. Lewis's, the
insolvent's solicitor, but could not get his address.'
Mr. DOWSE submitted that the insolvent was not
entitled to his protecting order under the section in
the 7th and Bth Victoria. The statute required that
the insolvent whose protection was refused on his
first hearing should place himself in the hands of his
creditors. In place of doing so he had been to France.
His evidence was now that he had visited England
twice. The evidence did not bear out his affidavit.
Reckless as he had been in contracting debts, he had
not evinced sufficient caution in making his affidavit.
His affidavit set forth that he had twice visited Eng-
land, and that he had walked about the streets of
London without concealment.
The insolvent explained that the ptssage respect-
ing his walking in the streets of London had refer-
ence to the period when he resided in London.
Mr. DOWSE would submit, notwithstanding this
explanation, that if a gentleman, no matter in what
position of life, was thus careless in making an
affidavit, he was not entitled to explicit reliance in
other statements that he might make. His affidavit
further set forth that he returned to take up his resi-
dence in London on the Ist of November. His evi-
dence that day fixed the date at about or a little
before the middle of November. The insolvent said
he had been about London Why, a man might be
about London in such guises and at such hours as
would effectually place him out of the power of his
creditors. It should have been shown by other evi-
dence than his own that he had not sought to conceal
himself from them. There was not the slightest
evidence to show that any of his creditors knew where
he was to be found, or that he had made known to
them his whereabouts.

Mr. BAGLEY could not help regretting that the in•
solvent had not, in mercy to himself and in mercy to
his friends, avoiding bringing his unfortunate con-
duct again before the public. If his affidavits had
stated fully what had been his conduct since the last
hearing, he was persuaded that the Court would not
have acceded to his petition to be again heard that
day. Not a single creditor resided in Dover, Folk-
stone, or Brightor, the places which he had visitea
on pleasure or business. He was asked if he had
seen any of his creditors, and his answer was
" No." He was asked if he had endeavoured to
make any arrangement with his creditors, and his
answer was " No." His petition virtually was to be
again heard, because since the 12th of July he had
not been arrested. Ile bad not given the cre-

ditors any oppOrtunity- to effect this; but even s;:1(1 he considcre
if he had, there were many of them whose jwiginee'-,, f
were either too old, or who had not obtained judg-
ments. These had no power to arrest hitn. 1 was
said he had been in London since November. He

would protest against the present- application as an
absurdity, and such as the Csurt' in the due Exercise
of its dignity, would unhesitatingly reject.
Mr. SAEGOOD said, the application at that time
was obviously premature, and it must necessarily be
dismissed.
- Mr. Nicnoees said he was sorry that any errors
had crept into the affidavits ,made by the insolvent,
but he submitted that the explanations which had
been given to his Learned Friend Mr. DOwse would
be deemed satisfactory by the court. He was sure that
there had not been, on the part ef the insolvent, any wil-
ful intention to deceive the creditors or the Court. It was
true the insolvent's debts were large, but he had known
many insolvents whose debts were much large,,r that M r.
Capers were who had obtained their immediate
dicharge. It should be recollected that the amount
of 32,0001., included 6,0001. on a-count of railway
liabilities, for which no consideration had been re—
ceived ; also a sum of 5,0001. to his brother (the Earl
of Essex) ; 4,0001. to Mrs Woodhouse, and otter
sums to private creditors, leaving the amount of trade
debts between 11,0001. and 12,000/. Some of there
had been contracted in the course of c fight years next
preceding the insolvency, and not in four, as stated
by Mr Bagley. There was no evidence that the
insolvent had been guilty of any fraud or misrepre-
sentation in contracting these debts. The creditors
knew that he was, although e member of a noble family,
only a younger son. 0:1 the last occasion 43 credi-
tors opposed; that number was new reduced to fif-
teen. He would submit that the insolvent had suf-
fered great inconvenience by being obliged to live se-
parate from his family, and that he had been so long
in the hands of his creditors that he was now entitled
to receive his protecting order.
His Honoun said that when the insolvent first
came up for his protection, whether he regarded the
amount of his debts or the period in which they had
been contracted, he felt it would have been an entire
dereliction of his public duty if he (the Commis-
sioner) had not then refused him the protection of
that court. He had heard nothing to alter his opinion
that those debts had been recklessly incurred, not in-
curred fraudulently or by misrepresentation, but
without any reasonable expectation of payment. He
should have been ashamed of himself had be refused
protection to a poor tradesman who had thus con-
tracted a small amount of debts, and let a gentleman
of elevated rank go scot-free from such a muss of
debts as he found in that schedule. He was clearly
of opinion that what the Jaw contemplated in the
98th section was, that a person who had contracted
debts as the insclvent had, and had the protection of
that court refused in consequence, should place
his person in the power of his creditors. Could it
be said that this gentleman had done so? He had
flitted from place to place, in every way escaping_
and avoiding his creditors. The section, he repeated,
contemplated that the person should be liable to the
seizure of creditors. Could it be said that the insol-
vent had done anything towards effecting an arrange
went with his creditors No ; nothing. Whilst he
felt it his duty to refuse the application now made, he
would say that he did not believe there had been any
intentional mis-statement by the insolvent in his affi-
davits, and that be had answered all questions as be-
came his station and character.
Mr. Nrcuones trusted his Honour would name a
day when the insolvent might renew his application.
His HoNoun said the application might be-renewed
after the lapse of five months. He should then require
the insolvent to show that he had made some proposal
to the creditors, and the creditors to show that they
had also made some c fforts to effect a settlement of
their demands.

POLICE. IN TELLIGEN CE.
MARYLEBONE.

The Rev. Mr. Boone, rector of St. John's Pad-
dington, and another Rev. Gentleman, one of the
curates, whose name did not transpire, attended at
this court before Mr. Broughton, who, on the previous
day, deferred his decision upon a charge preferred
against Mr. James Gammage, master of a national
school in Paddington, at the head of which is the
respected clergyman first alluded to, for having cruelly
ill-used one of his pupils, a delicate little boy named
William Taylor, ten years of age.
The evidence in the first instance given has already
appeared.
Whipp, the officer, now produced a cane, with
which, as alleged, complainant had been castigated.
(It will be remembered that it was sworn on the first
examination that the boy's back and shoulders had
upon them large wheals, and that blood had issued
from one or more of them; there was also blood upon
his shirt.)
By direction of the Magistrate, Mr. Jones, who
took down the former &positions, read the whole of
them to the several witnesses.

Mr. BROUGHTON (to complainant)—ls this the cane
you were punished with ? Complainant-1 think it
is, Sir ;it looks like it. (The cane was about a
yard and a quarter in length, and of no very great
thickness.)
By defendant—l was standing when you flogged
me. I think you were in a passion when you did se.
While you were punishing me you did not say any-
thing, to the best of my recollection. You were en-
gaged in giving a singing lesson at the time, and after
the caning you gave me, you went on with the lesson
as usual.
William Davidson, one of the teachers, said, in reply
to defendant, I saw you immediately after the com-
plainant left. You did not then seem angry. You
resumed your duties in the usual way. I have never
seen you lay a boy across the form to cane him, nor
did I ever hear of a boy being caned by you in that
way.
Thomas Bryan, the pupil teacher, who had given
the most important evidence on Tuesday, was de-
sired to stand up in the witness. box.
Mr. BROUGHTON—Did you ever see a boy beaten
before at the school in the same way that this boy
was ? Witness—Yes.
Mr. BROUGHTON—Have you ever seen a boy put
across the form when he had what you yesterday
called a " downright" flogging ? Witness-1 saw
such a thing once ; the boy's name was John Porter.
By defendant—Tnat was a year ago; and it was
for playing truant. He was flogged at his father's
request. I did not hear you caution and admonish
him while you were punishing him.
Crosswell, one of the warrant-officers of the court,
was re-examined, and said that when the warrant
was applied fox-.he teiw the state of ;he boy's back
and shoulders ;.there were several marks of violence,
and blood had oozed from one of them.
Defendant then called his witnesses.

Joseph Drake, a beadle, employed at the Rev.
Mr. Boone's church, said that he was present in
the school-room during the astronomical lecture,
sad he aaw the complainant there ; he behaved him-
self very improperly, and blackened some of the buys'
faces with ink, which caustd a laugh, while the lec-
ture was going on.

Aired King (a pupil) said, in answer to defen •
dant, I saw complainant laughing while the lec-
ture was being delivered, and he was cutting up an
apple, and putting pieces into other boys' mouths. I
have never seen you lay a boy across a form to cane
him. It was not my impression that you had lost
your temper.
By. Mr. BROUGIITON—The first caning was for
playing in school. The second for being saucy.
I never saw any boy caned so much before; but I
don't think the caning he had was enough for him.
James Hazeman, aged 12, was next examined. He
stated that he had been at the school between five and
six years. He was present when the caning took
place, and he heard complainant say that if he could
have laid hold of his whip which he had in the school.
he would have brought it out to his master.
By defendant—l have been caned by you, but only
when I deserved it. I believe lam the better for the
caning which I have received.

Defendant—l am glad to hear it.
Mr. Frost, master of another school at Paddington,
said that complainant was formerly a pupil of his, and
was a very unruly boy.
Mr. Baonairrori—Did you ever cane a boy till he
was bruised all over his back ? Witness—Certainly
not ; I should be sorry to clt so.
-Defendant—Does it require a very severe blow to
make a mark on the back ? Witness—l should
think not.
A. number of testimonials from clergymen of high
standing were banded in for the inspection of the
Magistrate ; they set forth that de'endant was a man
whom they much respected, and that his firmness of
purpose and at the same time kindness of manner to-
wards his pupils, were calculated to afford satisfaction
to all wider %hose authority he bad as a teacher and
master acted.
The Rev. Mr. Boone spoke in the highest terms of
the defendant, whose salary had recently, in cons, _
quence of his valuable services, been raised from 701.
to 801. per year. giving him so good a character
he was not only speaking his own sentiments, but
those of the whole of the committee also. He would
not enter into this particular case, but this he knew
that parents had frequently come to the committee,
with a request that their children might be severely
punished fur misconduct. He (the Rev. Gentleman)
knew no school in London in which corporal punish-
ineht, which he, generally speaking, disapproved, was
so seldom inflicted as in the establishment in which
defendant wes the master.

Mr. BROUGHTON carefully reviewed the whole of
the evidence adduced, and ultimately came to the
conclusion that chastisement of much too severe a
nature had heen inflicted, and he must therefore con-
vict defendant in a penalty for the assault.
He was fined 405., ,and in default of payment one
month's
amount
onment.
The mount was paid by the Rev. Alr. Boone, who

it a very hard case, swi the parties

LAM.BETIL •
Henry Harvey Savith,,, who has been in custody
since Saturday wt,ek, on a charge of extorting.ur
wards of 201. from :Mr. John Bright, a gentleman of
considerable property, residing at Brixton, who is
Treasurer ( f St. Ann's Society ~School, Brilit°D,
atid other charitable societies, and has beets for sow
years n guardian of the Parish of Lambeth, under a
threat of charging him with the commission elan
abominable offence, was again placed at the bar, Were

Mr. Elliott, for final examination.
s and
Mr: Clazkson, the barrister, Mr. rnphrey
Mr. Redpath, solicitors, appeared for the prosecution;
and Mr. Roberts upp€ared for the prisoner.
The depositions, which were of considerable length,
were red over, and the only fresh evidence take);
was that of a person named Re.stra, residing at Ne r
Clzurch-court, Strand, who said that the
lodged with him, and that he had seen MO-3°g 't
the prosecutor, four times at his house, but no,
oftener. (witness) had once or twice purchaaeau
mourning envelopes similar to the-one produced, the
the small seal produced belonged to his wif-'7 and t
prisoner had access to it, and used it to seal his Lett
ersf
The prisoner told him that Mr. Bright had a stun i°l
money belonging to him in his hands, vvhich he paid
hire by instalments. and added, that he had a°ot
something fur Mr. Bright,' and he, therefore,-did
dare to refuse him money. prison;
Mr. Clarkson then put in a number of letters soa
documents which he had read at the last e:-'arnin4tith;
and requested that they might be returned t°
Central Criminal Court as evidence against the.r4

soner.
The first of these was dated the 29th of Sept
1849, and was as follows : A yo
" Sir,—l hereby acknowledge that I have accair"f 1 •
of things that never happened, and I hope that this la
you will look over it, and if ever I trouble rli Ibis
money any more I give you full liberty to bring ~.0
against me, and punish me to the utmost rigovir of lu
~ a A 5'
law as an extorioner.
" To J. Bright, Esq."
It appears that upon the above document friend
been given by the prisoner in the presence of hick
of Mr. Bright, the prisoner received 811 for the
gave an I 0 U, and promised never to trouble
the
prosecutor again. Notwithstanding his prosulysitseep%
to.
o
prisoner soon after recotnmenced his old
writing and annoyance; and on the 13th of De!eothet
ber he received 3/. more, for which he gave 1113-
receipt, and also the following docutnent:-- raise
I give this to Mr. Bright upon his sawed Pr° '
that he will not proecute me " ivel•
n by the
her, 1849,
which was' dated the 13tb De—
wthaes rs
~nu lette-
The 2a9vtehrbsaetpimtemcbopery. of that give-
following Were amongst the numerous -
1
sen,t by the prisoner to the prosecutor :-- , 0 yOtt
Ytolattbri /61
sentStior,—mel; atlisleo
(r,ethtuerrnisybouurnotn;e d the rave'" that
you may be satisfied that I do LlT:lints:add
by word or dt el; and I am now my OWa Iligifg.,o i 5
the person who used to make me trouble you 150 v seed
takenT up and committed f ,r trial, which You 1e,;6',...c0i1*
_iiesday week's taper at the Marlborough P, se to er
His name is --• So lam now happy• r'eet. lta°,
swer by return of post; and Lahr) rend the paw",--ic
that you may know that I am not deceiviog Y°l"
" I remain, Sir, your otedient servalitv .c.o.
~ II A. Wl'

" J. Bright, E- q., Dec. 19, 1849." for 51.,
not_end.
The above contained a promissory
signed by the prisoner, and payable on dew,, 1850.
Loudon, Jo. vl.O igsia,
" Sir,—l new take the liberty of writing to I' pay the
and I have this time borrowed a penny t° at Of
postage, and after the oaths I have now roaele' Fat
Os
positively rely on me. lam now driven t tbeted poses
trimity, and if there is no answer to the Ter' If I re'
I have sent, I expect an answer ta-roorrovle you
ceive no answer, I shall then know what
to aui shall
will soon find out, and that when it is too late. you
leave it no longer than to-morrow. IC" hakeCsl3'ssOiti
said what I before stated, avoid it, and, as I older
to be saved, I will never trouble you again; the it.
may my right arm wither from my bad)", an", Doge'
fold vengeance f God follow me. If not sent 0--
it IN ill be too late.—Your obedient servant,
a a A. SO' 5g
"J. Bright, E:q., &c." le 18 to
"J. Bright, Esq. Jan. dotal .-
" Sir,—You will much oblige me by stepping,
"
the gate, as I wish to speak to you.
a a A. SA 'r rtoroned-
d.
" Sir —I have to inform you that I awn°. id,"
cut of my lodgings on account of what you ecillitly
out of the V. 10i..you gave me I gave my 1511 to pole
and I then got my clothes, so I am now about or one
by to-morrow's steamer, and I come to a,k Ynnones
sovereign and five shillings to pay my °P.bearer.
Plymouth. You know my writing, send it by the 00;
" H. A. Sl`v bill.
eat
" J. Bright, Esq., 4, Brunswick-glace, Brixteu r r
The former of these two notes the prig latter b
in to Mr. Bright by the servant, and the Istt tbe,
partially destroyed when given into custody, but or
fragments of it were found, part in the foreenhe jai
the prosecutor's house, and the other parts i 0 sea
side of the prisoner's umbrella at the station4l,l";his
The prisoner was fully committed, and durin,ejollf
examination, the Court, as on the previous oceLoter
was much crowded by the friends of the Pr°9,,:pre
and other person?, who were anxious to hear -
ceedings in the case.
M ARLBOROUGH-STRE Er- 110 r
ASSAULT AT THE QUEEN'S THEATNE.--.94".100
ditch was placed be fo:e Mr. Bingham, charged ottw-
s.aulting Thomas Datey, one of the check-takeee,cote
Queen's Theatre, Tottenham-street,- Tottenbnl
oar'
road.
The complainant stated, that on the precioVehecl,d'
ing, about eight o'clock, he was on the gallear'l
when the defendant Came up stake, and kr ae'vg:ll ittsg-
the check passed up into the -Hoe Ainde
friends
niaegrainitedyhsa
that
downhe
couldsnd gs
see,
r"
a9irs Abe
had
askedr
w oguianl
dv
hegt
omhe
iimnpt itotoa,
dhpteehal
iesyswe_oarf would
eptrhgyeot
bhe p oddc:7:
ntvviolstrneoe,osnbseurtthgehonet than he said he'd be it
which he had given him to the pit, and en,A. dhis
efeo to
so to do, witness refused to let him paSS•
nwup
eseaesrs: ip-sratocennadiein going up stairs and witness wfiSev
afld
tirn force
utzkd in
nm
stairso rad evri he tont
turblow prevent
leoaw r
in
nal :81; pie?:
ston • 0
a fit
knocked him down. Witness called for 09'1 to hie
stohemeprtifotnheer owthnsergeivheenekin-ttaokceursstoheayv.ing co
20°•
.
The de f aidant, who denied the charge, 11";
ficie
or in default was committer] for fourteen dal'.

BRISTOL, JAN. 30. its *---410,L
STOCK EXCHANGE.—The market maintains dal '' 67"
and prices are better. The transactions note*
Great Western, Quarters, 16:-% Ditto 17'
dis.—Bristol and Exeter, Thirds, 9 dis. 00a
LIVErooL, JAN. 30. , to•d#L•510:
STOCK EXCHANOE.—The market was dull The
an
the tendency of prices has been downivarthithereeW
actions were as follow :—Bolton, Blackburn, nt,, 114 bireS
West Yorkshire (No. I), guaranteed 6 perve,eat PP!: °„130,
Caledonian, 121, —Ditto, Preference, B%e---'cdinbtl,'irtP,-
I 114 Ditto, Quarters, 565. 3d. cum diir."--enose' dis."A
Glasgow, 27 c.—Lancashire and Yorkshire, s'j fl 03"
71. its. 3d.—Ditto, Fifths (West Riding
Liverpool Clitherne, and Stockport, 514 ul°;s4 Ktcl4'
FNiofrtht North-Western, 115—Ditto, e(WC.Q),ulars/ateres.4l`,,.' 1544101 eVicjip;
—Ditto, Halves, 2390 dis.—South-Easters' and
solidated solidated (No. 3), 1814 c.—York, Newcastle,„ ,a
(G. N. E. Purchase), 6 per cent. till 1850' 0
jon tifs
MANCHESTER, JAN. 34' 100_, ell
STOCK EXCIIANGE.—But little business ore PloiS'ail
our Stock Exchavga to-day; prices, however:a 11,0
same as last quotations. The transactions vit"riessliet,ti,f,
Caledonian, 1214--Ditto, Preference, Sk,‘"""-NT-totivorPe,t),
Yorkshire, Quarters, 114 London. and ester' -
1.16% —Ditto, New Quarters, 13/4 p. —blanch t
and Lincolnshire, 41A—South-Eastern and v"
Scrip, 6%.

t°.
do, .er'
BIRMINGHAM, JAN. 3°' . V01.7001' or
STom EXCHANGB.—The share market, 10,-$Ol, 01),;0,
day ; the only transactions were—Birma',Sloslll;
hampton, and Dudley (calls duly paid), 4V, 13:joirer
aid Birmingham (A), 7% dis —South 161011'1 00
Birmingham, New Union, 28. were
YORK, JAN. 29. ("'.
STOCK ExcHAitent.—The transactions ~tc);_,Dit2
follow:—York, Newcastle, and Berwick, 1670
E. Purchase), 3. . of

Vift3
o°l
BIRTHAI u hire, °I3
On the 27th inst., at Chirk, Denbigus- orio t
Captain E. Jones, of a son. .o,gcnt'6-' ,s'
Vic
On the 27,11 inst., in Albany-street, P-'
sell'
v. ife of F. Lablache, Esq., of a son. ~t.,14a iiiii
On the '27th inst., at the vicarage, Main soli' glie
shir.,, the wife of th Rev. S. G. Scobell, of II tore, _A.
On the 27th inst,, in Ebury-str.et,
of J. Worlledge, Esq., of job° /
a son. st.
On the 20th inst., at; Hatnilton-terracer
the wife of G. E. Balleras, Esq., of a son-
____.----
Eaton-sci „oe.

Pi 110
ndoll,
MARRIED. LO'
On the 26th inst., at Cripplegate Choral, oadoropi
Jane, eldest daughter of the Rev. T. 43S"," Fat'
_Ad
Crescent, Jewin-street, to John Palmer, .r''
Jamaica. Georgi,;oo,t/1010
On the 28th inst., at Leamington Priors,. of ,
son of the late Thomas Dick Lauder. Bairoghte ol
hall, to Antoinette Amelia Barclay, eldest ,00ftio
Alfred fat
late J. Macpherson, I. sq.
tin the 19th inst., at Bushey, Herts,
Hemel Hempstead, to Mary Anne, eldest
late Mr. T. P. Gaine.

----- 001
lel ler' DI

DIED. Cow' •
On the 2-10 inst., at Clifton, Lieutenant- • bier ,f
late of the 84th Regiment. 0 I lg, OP
On the 26th inst., at Bayswater, Ehlin,eli„,ll.o. ii ' 01
the late Rev. Godfrey Volley, rector of -Wi" place,
of Hutton Bushell, '; crkshire Eastman' G.
KeOnnt-trhoead2,7atgheidnsst9.., Mr. T. E. PryCe, of of
bter
i• °g ter
a we'
On the 27th inst., Louisa. the younges‘ „i iw•deoe
Charlton, Esq., Grove-read, St. John
On the 28tu ins Mrs. Diary \VW Widow, ' erlf
~ i , for°
row. Is ington,'aged 96. ts..wood, ii,,,t`e of
itb, pit'
On the 'nth inst., aged 73, Mr. James So' ie,
Basinghall street. ,o,„ioaf, out
On the 28th inst ,at Bristol, George A. v. d ~5 f il)
Lieutenant in her Majesty's 63d Regilnnt,.'Aogite °ie./ t
W.
the 27th inst., at oath, Elizabeth, ti ,i 0 c 1 " a'
. Bean, formerly of the Coldstream Grt),,.!.L.'!-- ti,l 'fi P
London: Printed and Published by tiliß 000 o.'ool
• ',llO. 112, •:3.tra,rl, Printer. at rhe ,S'?"' .r : riir'"
'itrrind..irr ,h:.. Prord,,, ..-- 'h.' 4.'-‘l"Z'
ItiddiVSOlL, Thursday, January 311 Is'''.