The Sun.
London, England, 1868-09-24 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON; THURSDAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER 24, 1868.

POT ICT,-I?/

'E-- Tide Day.

MARLBOROUGH-STREET.

ANNOYING TIIE INMATES OF THE MISSION-HOUSE,
GREEK-STREET.—Walter Blackburn, a lad, living
in Compton-street, Soho, was charged before Mr.
Tyrwhitt with the following disgraceful conduct.
Police-constable Joseph Edwards, 224 C, said
that about ten minutes pat 11 o'clock last night he
saw the prisoner and other lads come out of the lec-
ture ball in Rose-street, Solo, and the prisoner and
another lad pushed against a man and woman, and
then ran down Greek-street and commenced shout-
ing at the top of their voices, and made use of the
most disgraceful language, as Was a practice with
the lath leaving the hall nightly.
Inspector Harrison said he lived close to the spot
and heard the noise made by the lads last night,
and similar conduct was of nightly occurrence. Ile
had been constantly spoken to by the inhabitants
to abate the nuisance, and had some of the in-
habitants in attendance to sp3ak of the nuisance.
'lwo of the sisters from the Mission House, in
Greek-street, stepped forward, and one of them
said they were constantly being annoyed by the
disgraceful conduct of the lads frequenting the hall.
They were called very bad names, and kept awake
of a night by the disturbance made by them.
The prisoner said that all he bad to say was that
he came out of the Working Men's Club last night
about eleven o'clock, and some of the lads knocked
off his hat in Greek-street, and a policeman then
came up and took him into custody.
Mr. Tyrwhitt said the prisoner was oue of those
lads who, because he went to a place to learn
drawing and writing and such things, assumed to
lord it over every respectable person in the street.
He was well aware what a nuisance such lads must
be to a neighbourhood, and should fine the prisoner
405., or a month.

Thomas Ashley, 16, was charged with being
drunk and disorderly.
The prisoner was seen in company of a number
of other rough characters who infest the neighbour-
hood of Carnaby-street, and are a source of great
trouble to the public, pushing against persons, and
throwing himself iu front of them for the pur-
pose of upsetting them, and a constable took him
into custody, when he found that he was drunk.

Inspector Harrison begged to remind the magis-
trate that the present case was from Carnaby-street,
a street from which he was receiving continual
complaints of the conduct of such lads as the pri-
soner, and from which place a lad was charged with
similar conduct a few days ago.
Mr. Tyrwhitt fined the prisoner 40s. or a month's
imprisonment.

CEN7 RA L CRIMINAL COURT-7714 Day.

NEW COURT.
(3( fore Mr. Commissioner Kerr.)
THE CASE OF MADAME RACHEL.

The hearing of this case was resumed this morn.
ing ; the interest., judging by the crowded state o:
the court, having greatly increased since the firs
day.

An application was made at the sitting of the
court that the jury should go and view the premises
in Bond-street, but the judge said he had no power
to grant such a request. The jury, if they felt so
disposed, could go and do so at the rising of the
court.

Mary Ann 'Minton, the mother of the witness
henry Minton, raid she recollected a stranger
coming and making inquiries about her son, and
also taking out some leaves from a pocket book be-
longing to her son.
The boy was recalled, and identified the book.
Ile said some alterations had been made in the
waiting, but they were not done by him.
Col. William Edwards said he had got promotion
in March, 1867. He was connected with the family
of Mrs. Borrodaile, but had never communicated
with her in any way, neither had he ever received
large sums of money from her. He had never set
eyes on Madame Rachel before he saw her in that
court. He came to town in consequence of seeing
a report of the case in the daily papers.
Mr. Alexander Cope, the brother-in-law of Mrs.
Borrodaile, said he had called upon her whilst she
was living at Francis-street. lie also went to

Rachel's to get explanations with respect to her
having received various large sums of money from
Mrs. Borrodaile for an introduction to Lord Rane-
lagh, but she denied all knowledge of such a circum-
stance. Ile said he should put the matter in the
hands of a solicitor. Nothing was said by the pri-
soner about money in his presence. lie was quite
certain when he saw Madame Rachel that the name
of Lord Ranelagh was mentioned. Nothing was
said about Mr. Haymes. The day after he
returned to Fliutshire he received a letter
from Madame Rachel, which his sister-in-
law admitted writing. On his asking
her how she could be so foolish, she replied that
she was under the magnetic influence and control of
Madame Rachel.

Mr. Thomas William O'Keefe said he had come
forward in consequence of seeing his name men-
tioned in the papers. He had never in any way
been familiar with Mrs. Borrodaile. He and
his sons had been spoken of as Fenians, but such a
chargJ was simply ridiculous. his son was by no
means a half military, half sporting looking kind of
person. His son never wore a black moustache.
By Mr. D. Seymour--He never told Mrs. Burro-
daile to adopt criminal in preference to civil pro-
ceedings.

have you ever had experience of the stringency
of the one process over the other ?--Put your ques-
tion in a direct wanner and I will answer it.

I thought I had done so. (Question repeated.)
I now know what you are referring to. Fifteen
years ago I was tried at this court upon a charge of
obtaining money from a lady under the promise of
marriage. I was found guilty, but the Recorder
discharged me on my own recognisances, and I pail
the lady after the trial £lOO. The la IY in question
eventually made a confession of the groundlesiness
of the charge, which I consider was quite sufficient
to substantiate my innocence. [A Voice in court,
" it's not true."] I have the document I have re-
ferred to, and can produce it. To the best
of my belief I never spoke to the boy
Minton before he gave evidence in the
police-court. Mrs. Borrodaile had been to his
house once or twice, and so had Miss Sutton, but
the latter lady came in consequence of severe ill-
ness. I have assisted Mr. Credland in getting up
the prosecution. I have often spoken to Mrs.
Donoghue, the wife of one of the former bail. I
have expressed my surprise that Madame Rachel
should defend so bad a case. I never advised a
compromise. I said I thought it was Rachel's duty
to pay that money, but that referred to the
civil action upon which Mr. Cie„Hand had judg-
ment. I never advised a compromise on
the part of Madame Rachel. The circumstance
that led me .to speak to Mrs. Donoghue
was that I thought if Madame Rachel got bail she
would not appear, and that would be a serious thing
for her if her husband was bail for her to the amount
of £l,OOO.

By Sergeant Ballantine—l never had the slightest
authority from Mrs. Borradaile to make any such
proposition. I hereby pledge myself to produce
the document I have referred to, as my characte;
to a certain extent is at stake.
Mr. Digby Seymour—. Mr. O'Keefe, do you
know this lady (pointing to a lady close by) ?
Witness—Yes ; that is the lady in question.
Mr. Digby Seymour—Did you ever pay her more
than 120 of the £lOO you speak of ?
Witness—No ; because I was discharged from it.
Miss Sutton was next examined. She spoke to
a visit to Madame Rachel's with Mrs. Borrodaile.
When they were
with respect to the " " there is no
all talking Mrs. Borrodaile said,
William, Lard Ranelagh is the man." Madame
Rachel said there was, and he had been waiting
about outside the shop for over two hours. When
she and Mrs. Borrodaile got out of the house they
could see no one, neither did any one call after they
returned home.
This witness was not cross-examined by Mr.

Seymour.

Mr. Joseph Pyke, jeweller, of New Bond-street
-He recollected Mrs. Borrodaile requiring some
diamonds in 1866. He went to Rachel's house,
and there he learnt that there was to be a marriage,
and that jewellery was required. He went back
to his shop, and got a diamond coronet and neck-
lace, which were purchased. The articles were
afterwards not required, and he received £lOO to
cancel the transaction he had with Mrs. Borrodaile.
Lord Ranelagh said—l have seen the person de-
scribed as Mrs. Borrodaile more than once at Mdme.
Rachel's shop. I know nothing about a certain
" William." I never spoke to Mrs. Borrodaile more
than once. Every word in the letters read, as far as
they apply to me, is entirely devoid of truth.
By Mr. Digby Seymour—l solemnly declare I
never gave my card to Mrs. Borrodaile. I have no
doubt about that—not the slightest. The matter
about the cigar is totally and entirely false.
By Mr. Sergeant Ballantine_l have no recollec-
tion of having a second conversation with Mrs.
Borrodaile about Beaufort theatricals.
This was the case for the prosecution.
Mr. Roberta, solicitor for the prisoner, proved
that the whole of the letters read during the pre-
sent trial were in court and submitted to counsel
previous to the first trial. Everything done at the
last trial was done under the advice of counsel. He
also employed a person to make inquiries about the
boy Minton. He never authorised the person to
say he could get him a good situation. He always
thought the leaves taken from the book had been
returned.
Rachel Leverson, daughter of the prisoner, was
called and examined by Mr. Sergeant Parry—l am
27 years of age, and the eldest daughter of the pri-
soner. I have a sister named Leonte ; she is about
20 or 21 years of age. My mother has seven chil-
dren, all younger than myself ; the youngest is seven
years old. 1 have a brother in Paris named David.
We never had a person in our employ during
1866 G 7 named Edward. My mother only
occupied the shop and parlour in Bond-street.
'net e is a glass door between the shop and
parlour. I only knew Mrs. Borrodaile as a
customer at the shop. A great many ladies came
to our shop and bought expensive articles. At that
time we resided at Blackheath, bit in S3pt., 1866,
my mother took the house in Maddox-street. Mrs.
Borrodaile has never been there. 1 have never seen
her write at the shop. I know nothing of the let-
ters signed " William." I never wrote such a lei-
ter, neither has anybody to my knowledge. Ido
not recollect the intro luetion of Lord Thine-
lagh to Mrs. Borrodaile. To my knowledge
the boy Minton never was employed to write
letters for my mother. I know he has been
turned out of our house more than once. He came
with messages from Mr. Taylor.
By Sergeant Ballantine—The house was taken

in Maddox-street in the month of June, 1866, but
we were not in possession until Decembei, as it re-
quired painting and a great outlay of money. I
don't know that in 1866 my mother had an open,
box, but I know she had one in December, '66-67
It was on the pit tier, one of the 400 guinea boxes.
It was in '67 we went to Paris. As my mother
could not write I or my sister used to write
her letters. We had a boy named William
in the shop, but I have not seen him for a long time
until I saw him at the office of Mr. Ruberts before
the commencement of the proceedings iu this court.
It was after the Marlborough-street case. I can-
not say that the buy had left before I went to Paris
in 1867. I will swear that I never saw Mrs. Bor-
rudaile at the parlour of the Bond-street shop of au
evening.
Sergeant Ballantine—Do you mean to swear that
on your solemn oath ?
IVitnes3—Yes, I do. I never saw her in the par-
lour of an evening. I was constantly there.
Sergeant Ballantine—That you swear solemnly;
now do be careful.
Witness—l never saw her there of an evening.
Sergeant Ballantine—Did you ever know that
your mother received letters from Mrs. Borrodaile?
Witness—No, I never was aware of such a thing ;
neither do I know that my mamma received letters
to give to Mrs. Borrodaile. I cannot say posi-
tively at what hour we close the shop. It varied
very much. Sometimes early, sometimes late. My
sister was at the shop more than myself. I never
saw the boy Minton in my life.
Sergeant Ballantine—Then how came you to
swear he was frequently turned • out of your
mamma's house ?
Witness—My sister told me so. I knew no par-
tic Aar " ; the name is a very common
one. Mrs. Borrodaile gave a great deal of trouble.
She was constantly in and out of the shop in the
day time. I never saw her write there on those
occasions.

, Sergeant Ballantine.:—l see you deal in soap—
, such, for instance, as Alexandra soap, two guineas
a cake ; Royal nursery soap, two guineas a cake ;
Victoria soap, two guineas a cake ; Armenian
liquid for removing wrinkles—(laughter) ; Jordan
water, ten guineas and twenty guineas a bottle.
Where do you get the Jordan water from ?
Witners--It is brought from abroad.
Sergeant Ballantine—By whom ?
Witness—l shall not tell. It is water consigned
to us from the East and possesses powers of a par-
ticular quality.
Sergeant Ballantine—Where does it come from ?
You don't mean to say it is from the River Jordan ?
Witness—lt comes from the East.
Sergeant Ballantine—Yes, that might be Wap-
ping. (Loud laughter.)
Witness—lt.is consigned to us, as I've. told you
from abroad.
Sergt. Ballantine—You don't mean to say you
solemnly believe that it comes from the river
Jordan ? Where is the river Jordan? (Laughter.)
Witness remained silent.
Ballantine—Where does the Jordan water
come from ? (Laughter.)
IVituess—lt is sent us from abroad, and I shall
not expose our business transactions. If I tell
you --
Mr. Sergeant Parry (to Sergeant Ba'lantine)—
You will go and buy some and set up as opposition
establishment. (Shouts of laughter.)
Sergeant Ballantine (to witness)-IVill you tell
me where the River Jordan is ?
Witness remained silent.
Sergeant Ballantine—You'll not tell me then ?
Very well. (Laughter.)
Witness—l said we received consignments from
abroad, and that ought to be considered sufficient.
The learned Sergeant then read a quotation from
Madame Rachel's pamphlet " Beautiful for ever,'
relative "to the magnetic water from the Great
desert of Sahara, which had the great virtue of re
moving signs of antiquity"---(loud laughter)—and
then asked who was the author of the book, to
which witness replied " Myself and sister," and by
extracts from the public papers.
Miss Leonte Leverson—l am second daugh-
ter of the defendant. I assisted my mamma
in conducting the business in Bond- street.
I recollect Mrs. Borrodaile was constantly at our
shop in 1.866. I have never written sham letters
signed " I have never written the name
of Mrs. Borrodaile. I wrote none of the letters
produced during this prosecution. I never knew
any person of the name of William. I used to assist
in making our preparations. We deal in cosmetics.
I know the boy Minton used to bring letters
from Mr. Taylor. There is no place for writing is
the shop. I never saw the boy Minton in the par-
lour. I had to complain of his impertinence. On
no single occasion was he ever asked to write a
letter. On one occasion I had to turn him from
the door. I don't know that he ever saw my
mamma. I saw him on nearly every occasion that
he called.

By Sergeant Ballantine—Some time ago we had
a boy named William, but he was only to go
errands, never to write letters. Mr. Taylor's bill
had not been paid because it was an unjust claim.

I am not aware that my mamma - ever got
£l,OOO for beautifying Mrs. Borrodaile. I
know she had a great deal of trouble to
get money from Mrs. Borrodaile. I knew Mrs.

Borrodaile had large sums of money from mamma,
both notes and gold. My mamma always had some

money.

Sergeant Ballantine —Give me one particular
date when she did so.
Witness—l cannot.
Sergeant Ballantine—What, not one ?
Witness—We often lend ladies money, but we
don't take interest.

Sergeant Ballantine—And you've seen your
mamma lend Mrs. Borrodaile money ?
Witness—Yes, often ; she was at Bond-street for
it both morning and evening.
Sergeant Ballantine_Now, give me one date
when money was lent.

1% itness —I cannot ; but I know it was in 18G6.
I cannot state the exact month, but I will swear
that she did in most of the months of 1866. She

always wanted very large amounts.

Sergeant Ballantine—Name one.
Witness—l think I recollect her having £lOO
or £2OO.

Sergeant Ballantine—When?
Witness —ln 1866 or the year after. That's
the nearest approach to date I can give you. It
might be a few months before the end of the year,
or a few months after the beginning of 1867.
Sergeant Ballantine— And you can't give me a
nearer date than that?

Witness—No, I cannot. When Mrs. Borrodaile
borrowed the £lOO I do not know for what pur-
pose she required it. I have no idea. All I know

is that I heard her ask for the money, and in a short
time mamma gave her the money, but I don't know
from where she got it. I saw the notes, of that I

am certain—(sensation)— but I cannot say from
where she got them. My mamma had not a banker.
We shall continue the report in a late edition.

[The following is the concln,ion of yesterday's ovi-
deuce, which appeared in our Latest Edition of last even-
ing :—]

The Judge—There is still £227 to account for.
I gave an acknowledgment for that to Mrs. Borro-
daile, but it was afterwards returned to me by that
laly, who stated that she had arranged matters
with Madame Rachel.

A number of other monetary transactions,
amounting in the whole to nearly £4,000, were
then minutely inquired into by the learned Sergeant,
. .

the witness giving explanations as to the parties re-
ceiving the money. Tile witness said Rachel
told Lim she had paid Captain William El-
- Mrs. Borrodaile's cousin, a large sum
of money. Amongst the items charged there was
the sum of £lOO paid t 3 Mr. Pyke, the jeweller. Iu
explanation witness said Mr. Pyke took Mrs. Bor-
rodaile's acceptance for £1,200 for some diamonds,
and as the articles were afterwards not required the
£lOO was paid for taking back the diamonds.

Sergeaw. Batlantine-Ihon he took the accept-
ance for the diamonds, but they were never de-
livered up, so instead of selling he got the £lOO for
keeping the jewels ?---Yes ; that is so.

The Judge (looking at the cheques) _They all

Sergeant Ballantine—By whom ?
Witness --I really cannot say ; it must have been
one of the two. I always thought before that Mrs.
Borrodaile was going to marry her cousin.
James Minton then repeated the evidence he
gave on the foriner trial, with respect to
copying letters for Madame Rachel. This
witness gave his evidence in the
most straightforward manner, and when
cross-examined by Mr. Digby Seymour he
materially strengthened it by relating the circum-
stances connected with some leaves of his pocket-
book getting into the possession of the counsel for
Madame Rachel. The leaves were obtained by
some person who went to his mother and repre-
sented that he was about to get him a good situa-
tion, and it Was necessary that he should reckuire
specimens of his handwriting. This person Was
shown the pocket-book, and then the leaves were
removed. The paper planed in his hands memo-
randa, with respect to evidence to be given at the
trial, he knew nothing about. He had no recol-
lection of making full notes of his own evidence.
The leaves taken from his pocket-book had never
bean returned.
By Sergeant Ballantine —lf he was allowed to
look at the writing en the paper *Mr. Seymour had
placed in his hand, he could at once say,
without doubt or hesitation, whether it
was in his handwriting or not ? It was
impossible for him to deny or admit the
handwriting without seeing it. He knew there was
but very little writing in the book when he last
saw it. He could produce the book from which the
leaves had been removel to-morrow morning.
The court here adjouruel until to-morrow.

OLD COURT.
(Before Mr. Jtutice Keating.)

William Braikes, and Caroane, his wife, were
indicted for the manslaughter of their child, Bar-
bara Brookes, aged 12 months. They were further
indicte I for neglecting twJ other children, William
aged four and a half years, and Elizabeth, two and
a half years, and refusing to supply them with pro-
per food.

The case was a very melancholy one. The pri-
soners, with five children, lived in a small room in
Charlotte-street, ShoreditA, and it was stated that
the three youngest were often left for a long period
without food, and they were found in a deplorable
condition. 'rue youngest appeared to be dying,
and shortly afterwards expired. They were
shockingly emaciated, and it was evident
they had been starved and neglected. The
infant died from inflammation of the lungs pro-
duced by neglect and want of food. When their
wretched state was discovered they were removed
to the workhouse. The youngest child (the de-
ceased) weighed 81bs., the boy, 41 years old, nibs.
60z., and the girl 2k years old, 121bs.

The jury returned a verdict of guilty.
Sentence deferred.

THE WORKING CLASSES.

The proceedings at the late International Con-
gress of Workmen, where such strange theories
were propounded, give peculiar interest to an
article entitled Les Associations Ouvrieres en Angle-
terre, by Or. Montucci, which has just appeared in
the September number of the Revue Britannique.
We glean from it the following curious calculation,
by which the author endeavours to show what the
workman gains by contributing to a Trades Uu:on :
—Taking the most common case, that of wages
ranging between 30s. and 40s. a week, suppose the
workman to pay into the savings' bank the four
shillings a week he now pays to the union. There
his money will, at the lowest, produce three per cent.
interest, payable every six mouths. As the workman
gets nothing in that shape from his union, it is but
fair to admit that, in the case under considera-
tion, he leaves his interest to accumulate in the
savings bank. Now, calculating the produce of
his capital at compound interest, with the regular
weekly increase of four shillings, the workman, at
the end of twenty years, will find himself in pos-
-1 session of a sum of £3BO. Allowing for illness and
other mishaps, let it be £3OO. Now it is clear that
with such a capital at command, a shop may be
opened, some profitable business or other may be
carried on by the wife, while the husband, not
older than 50, perhaps, at the time, earns his
wages as usual at his master's establishment, with
the certainty of having secured comfortable means
of living for his old age. Comparing this hypo-
thetical state of things with the real one, the author
of the article shows that the workman who contri-
butes to the Union fund at the end of 20 years has
nothing; that, by belonging to the association, he
loses not only the £lO a year to which his sub-
scription amounts, but also on an average three
months' work per annum, in consequence of strikes
and other direct or indirect interference with the
regular course of business ; so that his means are
reduced to £72 per annum, instead of £llO, as
they would be in the former case.

SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE—This Day,

GRAVESEND, Thursday Morning.
Arrived, Sept. 23. Belloua, from New York.
Arrived, Sept. 24.—Pantse, from Bahia; Harmstons,
from St. Vincent ; Waverley, from Calcutta; Princess Vic-
toria, Cronstadt ; Charlotte Ann Auckland ; Charlotte,
from St. John's; Alligator, from Lagos.

DEAL, Thursday Morning.
Passed, Sept. 23—Tyne Queen, screw steamer, and
Orion, both from London, for Cardiff.
Passod—Straton, from Girgenti; Charlotte, from Ak-
yab ; Elcardo, from Leghorn; Flying Cloud, from Syd-
ney (in tow) ; Francis Milley, from Calicut ; Ann
Humphrey, brig, from Girgenti; Cardova, screw steamer,
from Gibraltar; Dilbhur, ship, from Havre ; Espania,
screw steamer, from Cardiff—all for London ; Trial, of
Goole, from the West, for the North.
Anchored—Gem, from Alexandre, for Dover; Nimroud,
from Callao, for Dunkirk.
Sailed—Clyde, for Calcutta.

IMPROVEMENTS IN THE TEMPLE.—In the demoli-
tion of the old Middle Temple Hall and the simul-
taneous construction of the new building rapid progress is
being made, as also with the projected alterations in
Crown-office-row, Lamb-buildings, and Tanfield-court,
and a new Gothic entrance is just completed to the trea-
surer's office. The roof of the old hall (now being re-
moved), said to be the best piece of Elizabethan architec-
ture in London, was built in 1572, and it is stated that the
screen, in the Renaissance style, was made of the spoils of
the Spanish Armada; but this is an error, as the records
of the society prove that it was sat up 13 years before the
armada put to sea.

SUICIDE OF A LUNATIC.—Au inquest was hell on
Tuesday by Mr. Whiston, at Derby, on the body of Eliza
Bennett. On Monday evening she threw herself across
the rails just as the Rugby train was arriving in the
station, and was crushed to pieces, The deceased had
of late shown symptoms of insanity, and the jury re-

turned a verdict of " Suicide while in an unsound state
of mind."

KENSINGTON IMPROVEMENTS.—AII improvement
is now being effected in Kensington, involving the demo-
lition of sundry blocks of buildings, to facilitate the pas-
sage of the traffic through the High-street of the " Old
Court suburb." On Tuesday 27 dwelling-houses and
promises, situated in High-street, Young-street, Mat ket-
court, and Gardners'-buildings, forming a portion of the
projected alteration, were disposed of by auction, and
arrangements made for the immediate clearance of the
ground to widen that great thoroughfare.

appear " for value received." That was not th e
case with the cheque foithe diamonds. "
Tne witness stated that he thought Madame
Rachel, by her transactions, acted as a sort of
banker to Mrs. Borrolaile.
Sergeant Ballantine—A banker of such a solid
description that you deducted your rent for her
premises before it becalm; due. (Laughter.)
This witness, in his cross-examination by Mr.
Digby Seymour, gave further explanations as to the
payment of the money received on behalf of Mrs.
Borrolaile, and also said that on one occasion a
quarrel took place at his office, when Madame
Rachel told Mrs. Borrolaile she was squandering
her money on liar paramour. He always believed
that Mrs. Borrodaila was aboat to inarry her
cousin, Capt. William Edwards.
Sergeant Ballantine—Then how cones it that in
your bill of costs that on the 28th of September
you charge her for an attendance with respect to
her marriage with Lord Ranelagh ?
IVitness—l must have been toll that such was
the fact either by Madame Rachel or Mrs. Borro-
d tile.

SPORTING INTEL LIGE

OS.

NEWMARKET FIRST OCTOBER. MEETING.
WEDNESDAY.

The Granby Stakes of 30 sovs each, 20 ft, for two year olds
nut named in the Rutland Stakes; colts Bst 101 b, fillies
Bst 71b ; winners of a sweepstakes value 200 soya (in-
, cludins tha w:nuar's own stake) 41b, of two such stakes
71b extra; Criterion Course; 15 subs.
Duke of Newcastle's Poinsettia, by Y. Melbc.:urne—Lady
Hawthorn, Bst 71b
Count Batthyany's Typhon, Bst 101 b (Morris) 2
Mr /Norman's Zgean, Bst 10:b (Pay) 3
The following also ran :—Atuity,NightJar, and S tandard
Bearer.
Betting-6 to 4 agst Poinsettia, 4to agst Standard
Bearer, sto 1 agst Typlin, and 6to 1 apt Amity. Won
easily by a length.
The St. Legar Stakes of 25 sous each, with 200 addeit for
three year olds; ca:t3 8.3 t 101 b, fillies Bst 61b ; the win-.
ner of the Epsom Darby or DoacAstsr St. Leger 71b, of
the Two Tribunal Gain 313 Stakes, PL•ines of Wales's
Stakes at AscA, or th 'Oaks 51b, of any two of the above
stakes 12lb extra; m 'ideas allow3d 71b; the second to
receive 5) sovs aul the third to save his stake ; D.I. ;
49 subs.

Baron Rothseltild's Restitution, by King Tom—Rest's
dam, Bst 31b (car Bst 41b) ..(Pordham) 1
Lord Wilton's see-Saw, list 10tb (C us tance) 2
Lord Zetland's Geaut des Batailles, Bst 101 b (T. French) 3
The following also ran : —Typhoon; Birdseeker, Cap-a-
Pie, and Redivivus.
Betting-9 to 4 agst Birdseeker, sto 2 agst Cap-a-Pie,
4 to 1 agst Geaut des Batailles, 10 to 1 each aget Ty-
phoeus and Restitution. Won by a neck.
A Handicap of 20 sows each, and only o ft if declared by
ten o'clock on Tuesdty evening (to ge to the second),
for three year olds and upwards. D.M.
Lord Vivian's Hatchment, by Vedette—Paradigm, 3 yrs,
Est 101 b
Lord Westmorland's Mabta Willie, 4 yrs, i'st 101 b
(Kenyon) 2
Duke of Hamilton's Clemenco,3 yrs, 7st 101 b (If. Covey) 3
Hippia and Witchcraft also ran.
Betting-2 to 1 agst Master Willie, 4to 1 agst
9to 2 each agst Clemence and Witchcraft. Won by half a
length.
A Handicap of 15 soya each, 10 ft, for two year olds