The Sun.
London, England, 1850-04-17 00:00:00

80/COUGH I:LOP 111.111CILET.

For all kinds of Hops the demand continues heavy at
barely last weeks prices.

NVIIXTECNAPEL.

Prime Beef, Mutton, and Lamb commanded a steady
sale at full prices. In other kinds of meat very little
was Joint. Beef, from 2s to 3s 2d; Mutton, 2s 6d to
3s 6d; Lamb, 43 6d to 5s 8d; Veal, 3s to 3s 10d; and
Pork, 33 to 4s per Blbs, by the carcase.

COURSE 0
Amsterdam 12 2

EXCHANGE.

Ditto, three months.. 12 ayi
Rotterdam . .••.• .• 12 3'4
Antwerp ••.•••• • •• • • • • 25 85
Brussels •••••• .. •••• • . 25 15
Hamburgh . • M.B. 13 13U
Altona• ••• .• .••• • • ••
Paris, 3 days'sight • 25 62%
Ditto, 3 months .. 25 85
Marseilles ............ 25 87
Bourdeaux.. ... •
Frankfort on Maine.... 121 h
Berlin • • ...... • • • •
Vienna, effec. 110 •• • • 12 6
Trieste, ditto.... ••• . .• 12 7
Petersburgh, Sil. Rble..
Madrid •••••••••• •• •• 4934
Cadiz •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• 50
Barcelona •• •• • • • • • • • •
Surills.• •• •• •• •• • • • •

Gibraltar • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Leghorn .. .••• .. • • 30 75
Gemoa •••••••• .• • • • • • • 26 15
Villas ..••....•.......
Venice.. .. • .
:s.raples .•.•••• • • • • • • • 40%
ralenno, peroa 122
Messina ••.••••• •• •• • • 122%
LiSboll• • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• 53 !,<,
Oporto•••••••• .• •• •• •• 53%
Rio Janeiro

I3uenos Ayres .. . • ....
New York, 21 days'aight
Philadelphia ..........
PIICIS OP BULLION, ?BE OR.
Foreign Gold in bars.. £3 17 9
Portugal Gold Coin .. 0 0 0
Spanish Doubloons .. 0 0 0
New Dollars .... • . 0 4 l 0 1,6
Sliver is bars ........ 0 4 11%

ROLLS' COURT.—(THIS DAY.)
The Master of the Rolls sat in his Court at Westmin-
ster to-day.
CARLISLE V. TEE SOUTH-EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY.
The further arguments in this part-heard motion oc-
cupied his Lordship the whole morning.

VICE-CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)
Causes of no general interest occupied the Vice-Chan-
cellor of England the whole day.
(Before the Vice-Chancellor KNIGHT BRUCE.)
His HONOUR heard bankrupts' petitions to-day, none of
which possessed any poiuts of interest.
(Before the Vice-Chancellor WIGRAM.)
INDERWICK V. SNELL.

The further arguments in this part•heard motion occu•
pied the whole morning.

COMMON PLEAS-(THIS DAY.)
(Before the Lord Chief Justice WILDE and Justices

CRESSWELL, WILLIAMS, and TALFOURD.) _
The business of the court this morning presented no
feature of interest.

QUEEN'S BENCH.—(THIS DAY.)
(Bf. fore Lord CAMPBELL and Justices PATTEXON,

WIGHTMAN, and ERLE.)

AUSTIN V. THE MANCHESTER, SHEFFIELD, AND

LINCOLNSHIRE RAILWAY COMPANY.

Sir F. THESIGER said in this case, which was tried be-
fore Mr. Justice Erie at the last sittings at Guildhall,
and in which a verdict was found for the plaintiff for
701., he had to move, on leave reserved to the defend-
ants, to enter the verdict fur the defendants. This was
an action against the defendants for negligence in carry-
ing certain hones belonging to the plaintiff from their
station at New Holland in Lincolnahire to Shoreditch,
by which negligence the plaintiff's horses were seriously
injured on their journey to London, by a wheel of the
carriage in which they were conveyed taking fire.
When the plaintiff brought the horses to the New Hol-
land station, to be conveyed by the railway, he did not
desire to have them carried in one of the horse-boxes of
the defendants, but preferred having them conveyed in
an open truck, in order to save expense, whereupon the
defendants refused to carry them in an open truck, un-
less the plaintiff signed an agreement indemnifying the
defendants against any injury the horses might sustain,
which the plaintiff signed.
Mr. Justice ERLE said Sir F. Thesiger was under a
mistake in believing that the verdict was given for the
plaintiff on the particular pleas on which he made the
application.
Sir F. TIIESIGER was glad to hear that that was so,
and would proceed no further in the case.
Mr. HumiatEs, who was for the plaintiff, confirmed
Mr. Justice Erie's statement, and
The application dropped.

EXCHEQUER.-.-(THIS PAY.)
(B►fore the Lo2w 011 D;) autos. and Barons P.tgxr,

EOLFE, and PLATT.)
TAYLOR v. S nsoN.

This was an action on a bill of exchange, in which a
verdict was given for the plaintiff. It appeared that the
bill was given to a party, in order not to oppose the last
examination of a bankrupt; and a question arose under
the 11th Vic., c. 106, as to whether a bill given for that
purpose became void. Mr. Justice Patteson, who tried
the case, did not think the statute applied to such a
tran action, and accordingly directed a verdict for the
plaintiff.
The LORD CHIEF BARON now delivered the judgment
of the Court, upon an application to enter the verdict
for the defendant, and stated that they were of opinion
that no rule ought to be granted.
Rule accerdiagly refused.