The Sun.
London, England, 1850-10-29 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, TUESDAY EVENING, OCTOBER 29, 1850.

WESTMINSTER.7(THIS DAY.)

77aatts Willi, was again brought before Mr.
Bro&;.;p, citar;4eci with creating a disturbance,
threatei,ing to break glass in Dean-street. Wrstmiuster.
The prp,o:;er yf'; tk-q•dtly ugh; up for breaking
h., to; i.-^l5 obj,'n% r videi,Vy was to be sent to
gaol wowo n tad r.t th,t cr.urse, but or-
Cer•Tti him to be d w fir t:, IN.;:e.ciat food, and
tiileaten, d .4-tv-: him the same as often as he came
before him under bireilar circum,.tatices. On his being
linerwed ILst night he was about to repeat his conduct,
but was prevented by tho police, and the charge having
been fully proved this morning, he was subjected to the
same treatment as yesterday.

SPO RTIN G INTELLIGENCE.
NEWMARKET BOUGIIION MEETING.
MONDAY.

Handicap Sweepstakes of 25 sous. each; for three yrs

old, and tii.w6rds. D. M.
Colonel Peel's Hardinge, 3 yrs, Bst 2lb ...(Flatiman) 1
Lord Exqer's Gardenia, 5 yre, Bst 71b ...(Norman) 2
BAting-4 to 1 on Hardinge, who waited on the mare
into the north, and won by halt a hngth. Run, in 1 min.
52 sees.

.F,..;fdt Class cf Handicap Swecpstakes of 10 F OVS.
act?. D. M. _

Duke of Rutland's St. Ann, .sirs, Bst 41b (W. Boyce) 1
Mr. Greville's Diligence, 3 yr.., 6,t 71ri (Charlten) 2
Duke of Riehrnonn's Composi, iat 12Ib (Flatman) 3
Lord Exeter's PreEltsw, 3 yrs, 6,it 121 b (J. Mann) 4
Mr. Batson's Beaucicrc, 5 yrs, Bst lib (Sly) 5
Betting-5 to 2 each ugA Preslaw, Diligence, and
Compo,s. Beaucicrc rcade steady running to the curds,
where he was passed by Diligence 4nd S. Ann, the ht-
ter obtaining the lead half-way up, and winning easily
by a length. Run in 1 min. 45 s-cs.
Sweepstakes of 10 nova. each for two yrs old; colts,
Bst 71b; fillies, Bst 51b. The winner to be scald for
250 sovs., if demanded, &e. First half of An. M.
Duke of. Bedford's Solomon (F. Butler) I
Mr: Greville's Constance
Mr. Wauchope's Castellan (Whit( house) 3
Betting-6 to 4on Constance. A very fine race with
all, Solomon winning by a head. Run in 53 secs.
Match., 50. T.Y.C.

_ .
Mr. Blyth's Hippogriff, 2 yrs, Bi,t 71b (Charlton) 1
Mr. C. Pitcher's izy, 2 yrs, 8.,:t 515 (Flatmati) 2
Betting-5 and 6 to 4 on liippogrilf, who made ail
the running. and won in a cutter by two lengths.- Run
in 1 min. 16 secs.

HA YMARKET THEATRE.

Last night was signalised at this theatre by the re-
appearance of Macready, the series of whose fare-
well perf_anances has, alas! at length arrived. His
reception was most enthusiastic. The entrance of the
real tragedian on the scene of so many triumphs
was the zlgind for a burst of heartfelt and vehement
cheering, again and again renewed, a just and
honourable tribute to the long and bright career of
his tra,nscendant abilities. The MacbAh of Ma-
cready needs no comment now. It is it the most
masterly of his Shaksperiart delineations. The
agonising horror of the spectre-stricken mur-
derer in the banquet-scene, and the terrible
energy with which the usurper stands at bay,
fighting in his last stronghold for his blood-
stained crown, were rendered last evening by Mac-
ready with his wonted vigour and intensity, and drew
down thunders of applause. With scarely a percep-
tible failure i❑ physical energy, and with a deeper
mellowness of tone, this illustrious artist quits the
stage in the fulness of his fame, in the autumnal rich-
, nk,ss of his glorious powers. The plaudits nmidst
which the curtain descended were speedily inter-
mingled with loud calls for Macready, who bowed his
acknowledginents to as enthusiastic a band of spec-
tators as ever shook tl-.e walls of a theatre in tendering
a deserved need of honour to so eminent, a combieti-
tion of professional and private worth. The compli-
ment of a call was likewise most fitly evencled to
Mrs. Warner, whose Lady Macbeth was characterised
by the usual energy and judgment cf that established
favourite of the play-going public; and to Mr. I.Lz-
venport, an excellent and valuable performer,
who, in Macduff, gave evidence cf sterling qualth-
e.eiuns, which will, we doubt not, confirm in
other characters, the favourable impression which he
made upon the Haymarket audience on the occasion
of his first apf,earance before them lust night. The
general getting-up of the piece is creditable to the
management, the supernatural department in par-
ticular being very effectively and carefully arranged.
Miss P. Horton, as Hecire, and the several rigging
witches, did due justice to Locke's sublime music, and
Bland and Selby were able coadjutors in malignancy
with Stuart, whose representation of the principal
of the Weird Sisters was a most artistic and striking
development of the features of a part which, in ordi-
nary or careless hands, might pass unnoticed in the
general throng. The house was completely crowded,
every available seat being occupied at the rising of the
curtain.

THE QUARTERLIES.

THE QUARTERLY RE VIEW. No. CLXXIV.
Already in our leading columns we have taken
occasion to commend one of the most attractive pipers
in the current number of the Quarterly, the paper re-
lating to the closing scenes in the history of Louis
Philippe. While pretending to be nothing more than
a species of running commentary on a recently pub-
lished anonymous pamphlet by M. Lemoine, the con-
tribution in question is a vivid and genial descrip-
tion of the mode of life adopted by the late ex-King
of the French in his exile at Claremont, and at the
Star and Garter in Richmond. Subsequently of
course the article depicts the last illness and dissolu-
tion of the fallen sovereign, accompanied throughout
by an incidental portraiture of his character. So
charmingly is the whole account penned, so dex-
terously has the writer discriminated among the
Protean phases of this extraordinary man's genius,
so agreeably does he banish from bis mind
for a while all petty prejudices and idle predilections,
that we cannot hut reiterate our previous recom-
mendation o!' the paper to our readers as one calcu-
lated as much to interest them as it is to prove ulti-
mately useful to the historian. Mr. Millie Cochrane
is not " let down" as easily as M. Lemoine by the
Quarterly reviewer, seeing that in a notice of
" Young Italy," that brilliant and delightful volume
is anathemati,ed by the critic as baleful in its influ-
ence and insiduous in its character. Equally virulent
are the comments passed by another contributor on
M. R. gnault's sagacious and painstaking history of
the French " Provisioned Government." In review-
ing that narrative penned by the chef du Cabinet du
Ministre Provisoire de l'lnterieur, the writer takes oc-
casion to tell again the infinitely more than thrice
told tale of the rise and fall of the Provi-
sional Government. While doing so, moreover,
he gratifies his spleen by scattering sentences
of derision or of contumely upon all the principal
actors in that great revolution—now flinging a sar-
casm at Marshal Bugeaud, now at M. Thiers, now at
M. Marrast, now at M. Odilon Barrot, now at M.
Ledru Rollin, now (and most of all) at poor M. de
Lamartine. The insincerity of all these perversions
of the story of the days of February, we must avow, has
begun to pall upon the appetite of English readers.
People have become gradually nauseated by the slan-
ders dedicated to the depreciation of the Provisional
Government, insomuch that the revival of these ca-
lumnies is becoming at last altogether unendurable.
Perhaps it is that the enemies of the Republic think
to get their accusations at last credited in some quar-
ters by their constant repetition. Supposing this, how.
ever, to be the case they will find themselves most grie-
vously mistaken ; forevery new charge levelled against
the founders of the Republic only elicits some new
evidence of their magnanimity, only calls forth new
evidence of their true and earnest civism. Perhaps
the mast substantial tribute yet oflered to the leaders
of the French democracy is this very work of M.
Regnault, which the Quarterly has attempted now to
vilify and now to depreciate. A better fate than this
has been reserved for Mr. George Ticknor, the histo-
rian of " Spanish Literature," whose learned labours
are commended with all earnestness in the opening
paper of the current number of this distinguished
periodical. The literature enriched by the genius of
Calderon, of Queredo, and of Cervantes presents of
course to the reviewer a fruitful theme for his scho-
larly disquisition. The criticism will be read at once
with profit and satisfaction. t' The Church and Edu-
cation in Wales" must arrest the attention of
the more reflective readers of the Quarterly, and
cannot fail, when read, to excite a great degree of
solicitude. Another practical subject for reform—
the "Metropolitan Water Supply —is considered
further on with an equal amount of lucidity. The
question is discussed in all its bearings, and in
doing this the writer has heaped together a great
quantity of interesting information. Kindred in spirit
and feeling with the article on Mr. Ticknor's work
respecting " Spanish Literature" is a subsequent one
on Colonel Mure's work relating to " Greek Litera-
ture." In the latter contribution the ingenuity and re-
search of Colonel More are duly recegnized. " Siberia
and California," while affording materials for a paper,
attra cpt
ri voev,e alikee qua
ytlol the geographer and the geologist,
will agreeable themes for inquiry
to the chiefs and hangers-on of the moneyocracy.
Such volumes as those recently penned by Mr.
Ryan, Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Buffam have suggested
the idea, and supplied many of the materials of this
clever contribution. The most gossipping, and con-
sequently the most generally entertaining of all the
articles contained in the current number of the
Quarterly, however, as yet remains unnoticed; we
allude to the amusing paper on the " Forms of Salu-
tation." The writer introduces us to all the tongues
of ancient or modern civilization. Now the Greek
hails us with his pleasant word of greeting—Xatpi
—rejoice, be glad ! The Roman cries out to us Salve!
Vale !—be healthy ! be strong ! Then the Genoese
in the middle ages exclaim Sanita e guadagno—health
and gain ! At last the Italian greets us with Come sta
Come state ?—how do you stand, be, exist ? We hen
the Spaniard again, with his Buenas tardes ?
good late instead of good evening : and his Vaya con
Dios, Senor Caballero I—go with God, Signor Cava-
lier ! The French phrase Comment vous portez-vous ?
—how do you carry yourself—or that other and yet
quainter one, Comment ca va-t- it ?—how that goes it ?
The German Wit, gehts?—bow goes it ? and their
other expression Leben sie wohl !—live well ! The
Low Dutch Hoe vaart's ge ?—how fare you ? The
Swedish Hur mar ni ?—how can you ? Our own—
flow are you ? and how do you do ?—are all succes-
sively enumerated, and are each made the subject for
some amusing and humorous criticisms. The article
in question not less than the rest of the number will
ben o t foundtha
en
d least vse r
happy
attractiverp epayd itbelme temperament;
portion
osavours t
nhodef
hence
er
engscoeeondt
is diges-
tiont o u
instal-
ment of the Quarterly.

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE.
Among the many interesting 'articles contained in
the present knumber of the above-mentioned perio-
dical, one of a biographical character is devoted to
the career of the late " James Smith, of Deanston."
An intelligent contribution on " Ceylon" is followed
by an ingenious essay, entitled " Cogitations on
what is the Field Drain." Another contributor,
Dr. Anderson, has a paper on the " Economy of
Manure," well deserving of the most serious atten-
tion of the agriculturists. A chapter en " The
South American Animal Manure," and another on
" The Feeding of Horses," convey, in a popular and
lucid form, a large amount of information. The
whole contents are wound up by a detailed and
comprehensive " Account of the Show at Glasgow
in 1850," a subject interesting not only to our
northern fellow-countrymen, the farmers of Scotland,
but, more or less, to the whole body of agriculturists
throughout the 'United Kingdom.

CARDINAL WISEMAN.

REPLY OF THE BISHOP OF LONDON TO
THE MEMORIAL FROM THE WEST-
MINSTER CLERGY.

Yesterday the Bishop of London sent the follow-
ing reply to the memorihl signed by the Archdeacon
and Canons of Westminster, and a large body of
the clergy of that city, presented to his Lordship on
Friday :

" Fulham, Oct. 28, 1850.

" Rev. and Dear Brethren,—The sentiments ex-
pressed in the address which you have presented• to
me are in entire accordance with mine, and I am, per-
suaded that they will be responded to by the ucani
mous feeling of Protestant England.
" The recent assumption of authority by the Bishop
of Rome in pretending to parcel out this country
into new dioceses, and. to appoint archbishops
and bishops to preside over them, without the con-
sent of the Sovereign, is a schismatical act, `without
precedent, and one which would not be tolerated by
the Government of any Roman Catholic kingdom.
trust that it will not be quietly E übmi ttc d to by
our own.

" Hitherto from the time of the Rerormatien the
Pope has been contented with providing for the spi-
ritual superintendence of his adherents in this coun-
try by the appointment of vicars apostolic, bishops
who took their titles as such not from any real or
pretended sees in England, but from some imaginary
dioceses in partibus infideliurn. In this there was no
assumption of spiritual authority over any other of
the subjects of the English Crown than those of his
own communion. But the appointment of bishops to
preside over new dioceses in England, constituted by
a Papal brief, is virtually a denial of the legitimate
authority of the British Sovereign and of the English
episcopate ; a denial also of the validity of our orders,
and an assertion of spiritual jurisdiction over the
whole Christian people of the realm.
" That it is regarded in this light by the Pope's
adherents in this country is apparent from the lan-
guage in which they felicitate themselves upon this
arrogant attempt to stretch his authority beyond its
proper limits. A journal which is generally believed
to express the sentiments of a large portion of them
at least (not, I believe, of all) points out in the fol-
lowing words the difference between the vicars apos-
tolic and the pretended diocesan bishops. Alluding to
certain members of our Church who are accused of
a leaning towards Rome, it says—' In this act of
Pope Pius IX. they have that open declaration for
which they have been so long professing to look. 'Rome,'
said they, " has never yet formally spoken against
us. Her bishops, indeed, are sent here, not as having
any local authority, but as pastors without flocks ;
Bishops of Tadmor in the Desert, or of the ruins of
Babylon, intruding into territories which they cannot
formally claim as their own.' This specious argu-
ment is once for all silenced. Rome has more than
spoken; she has spoken and acted ! She has again
divided our land into dioceses, and has placed over
each a pastor, to whom all baptized persons, without
exception, within that district, are openly commanded
to submit themselves in all ecclesiastical matters,
under pain of damnation, and the Anglican sees,
' those ghosts of realities long passed away, are utterly
ignored.'
" The advisers of the Pope have skilfully contrived
so to shape this encroachment upon the rights
and honour of the Crown and Church of England
that his nominees to imaginary dioceses will not ac-
tually offend against the letter of the law by assum-
ing the titles which he has pretended to confer upon
them ; but that it is contrary to the spirits of the
laws there can be no doubt. As little doubt can
there be that it is intended as an insult to the Sove-
reign and the Church of this country.
" With respect to the conduct proper to be pursued
by you on this occasion, it ought, in my opinion, to
be temperate and charitable, but firm and uncom-
promising.
" You will do well to call the attention of your
people to the real purport of this open assault upon our
reformed Church, and to take measures for petitioning
the Legislature to carry out the principle of the sta-
tute which forbids all persons other than the persons
authorized by law to assume or use the name, style,
or title of any archbishop of any province, bishop of
any bishopric, or dean of any deanery in England or
Ireland, by extending the prohibition to any pretended
diocese or deaneries in these realms.

" It is possible that such prohibitions might not
have the effect of preventing the assumption of titles
by the Papal bishops, when dealing with their own
adherents ; but it would made the assumption unlaw-
ful, and it would mark the determination of the people
of this country not to permit any foreign prelate to
exercise spiritual jurisdiction over them.
" But there are other duties besides those of pro-
testing and petitioning, the performance of which
seems to be specially required of us by the present
emergency. Unwilling as lam to encourage contro-
versial preaching, I must say that we are driven to
have recourse to it by this attempted usurpation of
authority on the part of the Bishop of Rome, and by
the activity and subtlety of his emissaries in all parts
of the kingdom. We are surely called upon for a
more than ordinary measure of watchfulness and dili-
gence in fulfilling the promise which we gave when
we were admitted to the priesthood, *to banish and
drive away all erroneous and strange doctrines con-
trary to God's Word.'
" Let us be careful, as well in our public ministra-
tions as in our private monitions and exhortations, to
refrain from doing or saying anything which may
seem to indicate a wish to make the slightest approach
to a church which, far from manifesting a desire to
lay aside any of the errors and superstitions which
compelled us to separate from it is now re-asserting
them with a degree of boldness unknown since the
Reformation, is adding new credenda to its articles of
faith, and is undisgaisedly teaching its members the
duty of worshipping the creature with the worship
due only to the Creator.
" After all, I am much inclined to believe that in
having recourse to the extreme measure which has
called forth your address the Court of Rome has
been ill advised as regards the extension of its influ-
ence in this country, and that it has 'taken a false
step. That step will, I am convinced, tend to
strengthen the Protestant, feeling of the people at
large, and will cause some persons to hesitate and
draw back who are disposed to make concessions to
Rome, under a mistaken impression that she has
abated somewhat of her ancient pretensions, and that
a union of the two churches might possibly be effected
without the sacrifice of any fundamental principle.
Hardly anything could more effectually dispel that
illusion than the recent proceeding of the Roman
Pontiff. He virtually condemns and excommunicates
the whole English Church, Sovereign, bishops, clergy,
and laity, and shuts the door against every scheme of
comprehension save that which should take for its basis
an entire and unconditional submission to the spiritual
authority of the Bishop of Rome.
" That it may please the Divine Head of the church,
who is the true centre of unity, and the only infalli-
ble judge, to guide and strengthen us in these days of
rebuke and trial, to open our eyes to the dangers we
are in by our unhappy divisions, and to unite us in
one holy bond of truth and peace, of faith and charity,
is the earnest prayer,
"Reverend and dear brethren, of
" Your affectionate friend and bishop,
" C. J. LONDON.
"To the Rev. the Clergy of the city and
liberties of 'Westminster."

The following signatures have been received since
the presentation of the address :
A. M'Caul, D.D., Prof. of Div., King's College, London.
J. R. Major, D.D., Head Master of the School, King's Col.
E. H. Plumptre, M.A., Chaplain and Div. Lect., King's Col.
M. Biggs, M.A., Div. Lecturer, King's College.
R. Hayes, M.A., Censor and Div. Lect., King's Col., London.
E. G. Beckwith, M.A., Minor Canon of St. Peter's. Westmr.
W. H. Cope, M.A., Minor Canon and Librarian of St. Peter's,
Westminster, and Chaplain to Westminster HoEpital.
T. Helmore, M.A., Priest in Ordinary of-H.M. Chapels Royal.
W. J. Hall, M.A., Priest in Ordinary to her Majesty.
T. Markby, M.A., Assist. Mom. Preacher at the Savoy Chapel.
W. Harness, M.A., Perp.Curate of All Saints, Knightsbridge.
W. G. Tupper, M.A., E. N. Crake, BA , Assistant Curates of
All Saints, Knightsbridge.

ENTTIRONEMENT of DR. ULLATIIORNE.
BiamiNGrum, OcT. 28.—Dr. Ullathorne, in obe-
dience to the recent Papal bull, was yesterday morn-
ing duly enthroned at the cathedral in this town
Roman Catholic Bishop of Birmingham. His spiritual
jurisdiction extends over the counties of Warwick,
Worcester, Stafford, Oxford, and Berks. In conse-
quence of the novelty of the ceremony, and the dis-
cussion to which the Pope's ecclesiastical appoint-
ments have given rise, the cathedral, long before the
commencement of the service, was crowded to ex-
cess, and it is stated that no fewer than twelve gen-
tlemen, formerly ministers of the Anglican Church,
were among those assisting in, or witnesses of the
ceremony. It was evident, however, that a large
portion of those present were attracted by curiosity,
and were not members of the Roman Church. The
service commenced with a procession of the clergy,
amongst whom were the Revs. Dr. Moore and F.
Amherst, of Oscott College ; Dr. Aubert, of Mary
Vale ; Dr. Weedall, Dr. IN ewman, and Dr. Brown,
President of the Sedgley park Seminary. As the
procession moved„the choir sang the Psalms," Laudato
pueri Dominum, and " Laudo Jerusalem." On ar-
rival at the altar a pontifical high niass was com-
menced by the Bishop, assisted by a very numerous
retinue of priests. Altogether, from the number of
the ecclesiastics engaged, the magnificence of the
structure in which they were assembled, and the
splendour of the habiliments worn by the priests, the
scene was extremely imposing.
The sermon announced to be preached by Dr.
Newman, formerly.
,of the Established Church but
now Father Superior of the Oratorians in Birming-
ham, excited by anticipation most interest, and led
chiefly, without doubt, to the numerous attendance
of Protestants, who were observable in all parts of

the cathedral. Allusions to the Pope's bull and to
the controversy which it bas induced were naturally
expected, but references of this nature were " few and
far between." Dr. Newman selected as the subject
of his discourse (Matt. xiv., 23 and 26) the miracle of
our Lord walking upon the sea. The sermon was
long and extremely discursive, nor had it generally
any close connexion with the text. After referring
to the miracles accomplished by our Lord, he referred
to the difficulties and successes of the Catholic
Church at various periods of English and Continental
history, and said it was impossible that the mind of
his congregation could be otherwise than solemnly
impressed by the momentous event at which
they were that day called upon to assist. God's
work was slow, but, in the end, sure to be ac-
complished. His faithful Church would ultimately
be gathered together in one fold ; and, as one
proof of progress towards such a consummation, the
Catholics of England now rejoiced in the restoration
of the Roman hierarchy. The people of England,
who for F o many years bad been separated from the
See of Rome, were now about, of their own free will,
to be again added to the Holy Church. The preacher
contrasted the present times with some former periods
of history. Catholic Bishops might now go forth
with their crcziers in their hands, and children clad is
white testified to the revivification of the true church. r
The whole face of society was changed. Christ
walked upon the troubled waters, and said, "Peace,
be still l" They now enjoyed in England the blessings
of that religion which was known only by one name
—a holy hierarchy ; that religion which throughout
1,800 years had, under the patronage of the saints,
remained the same. 300 years ago the Catholics of
England became tired of the blessings they then en-
joyed, and they were deprived of the hierarchy. The
mystery of God's providence, was now, however, ful-
filled. He (Dr. Newman) did not recollect any
people on earth, but those of Great Britain, who,
having once rejected the religion of God, were again re-
stored to the bosom of the church. But what had God
done for them ? It was wonderful in their eyes. The
holy hierarchy had been restored. The grave was opened
and Christ was coming out. After referring to diffe-
rences of opinion between the Roman and Reformed
Churches, the Doctor said that Catholics were mis-
understood and misrepresented. But Catholics placed
their reliance upon God, and were indifferent to per-
secution and opposition. The opposition to which
they were subjected was the castigation of the Devil.

Roinan Catholics knew the wisdom and love of the
rulers of their Church. They knew the piety, the
zeal, and the simplicity of the great Pontiff. They
knew that the Holy See ordered all things for the
glory of God, and not for the obtainment of worldly
power. Let them not, on a day like that, indulge in
feelings of triumph, but let them express to Almighty
God their gratitude for the blessings he had thus con-
ferred upon them. He had no fear of the roaring lion
now going about to terrify the weak minded. The
lion might roar, but that in the present instance was
all that it could do. Let them pass it by unheeded,
for they might rely upon it the lion, boisterous and
roaring as it was, could do them no injury; he (the
preacher) had likewise no fear for the zeal of the Pope,
the bishops, or the priests ; but he must confess that
he did entertain a fear of the degeneracy of the Ro-
man Catholic people; he urged them to be Roman
Catholics not only in name but in practice also, for
they who continued in the commission of sin were
not true members of the Catholic Church.

The above is necessarily a meagre sketch of a ser-
mon which occupied an hour and a half in the deli-
very, and the greater portion of which, owing to the
preacher's feeble articulation, it was difficult to com-
prehend.
The attendance at the cathedral in the evening to
hear Dr. Ullathorne's inaugural sermon was quite as
numerous as that in the morning. Those persons who
have read the Doctor's letter will be already ac-
quainted with the import of his sermon last night. It
related exclusively to the duties and responsibilities
of the person appointed to the office of bishop in the
Roman Catholic Church. The office had not been
voluntarily assumed by him, but was an appointment
by the Holy Pontiff, to whose authority the Catholic
clergy were bound to submit. His duties were purely
spiritual, not secular (with the exception of attention
to the temporalities of the Church), nor political, and,
as the interests of eternity were infinitely more im-
portant than those of time, so the office of bishop in
the Church of God was infinitely higher, and its re-
sponsibilities greater, than those of an earthly p.zince
and potentate. Throughout the entire sermon, which
was eminently plain and practical, the Right Rev.
Bishop never in the remotest degree referred to the
controversy now waging against the Pope's assump-
tions. His language was free from the slightest
tincture of acrimony, and the sermon, which lasted
more than an hour, was listened to with the moat pro-
found attention.