The Sun.
London, England, 1850-09-04 00:00:00

Vbtrb %titian\
WARWICK RACES,
(THIS DAY.)

(BY ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH.)
The Great Warwickshire Stae3.

..walked over

Milcote

The Town Plate.

... 1

.ZEgis ... ... ... ...
Captain Parry ... ..• ••• •••
The County Stakes.

... 2

... 1

Turnus .••
Little Jack

... 2

LTriel •• •

••• •••
The Avon Stakes.

Harriett ...

Turtle ...

... 2

ST. LEGER BETTING.
18 to 1 agst Cruiskeen Colt.

FRAN CE.

At the sitting of the Tribunal of First Instance
yesterday, M. D intend, notary, presented to the
President the will of the ex-King Louis Philippe,
and the President decreed that M. Dentend should
retain possession of it. This document is written
by the King himself. By another judgment the
President, M. Breton, was charged to translate the
register of the death of Louis Philippe, communi-
cated by the registrar of the district of Esher, county
of Surrey. This he did, after taking an oath to
translate faithfully.
The Ordre has the following on the attempt made
by certain parties to bring about a fusion of the two
branches of the Bourbons
A violent act destroyed the Charter of 1830, and
overturned the throne of the Orleans family. But,
amongst the citizens, who in presence of the present ex-
perience of republican forms, do not despair to yet see
a constitutional monarchy, many preserve the same
feeling with respect to that family. They think that if
the national majority one day decided to restore that
monarchy, it might be led, as in 1830, to apply to
princes whose character it esteems and whose ser-
♦ices it appreciates. Why do they persist in that idea?
Because they believe, right or wrong, that the royalty of
the House of Orleans, with a regime liberally and sin-
cerely representative, would be the best form of applying
the principle of the national sovereignty, and because it
is the serious, useful, and political maintenance of that
principle, which they desire before all. But, if the Orleans
family abandoning that principle of national sovereignty,
of which it was the expression in 1830, should go and
range itself under the flag of legitimacy, what would it
have done? It would have renounced the eventualities,
which may be reserved to it by the position which the
country spontaneously gave to it in 1830. It would thus
separate from France, but it would draw France after
it? Tbat would be too much to suppose. France, with
the Orleans family, would not the less remain power-
fully, and immovably attached to the supreme principle,
which by its determined desire will henceforward pre-
side over its destinies. What, then, would in definitive
be the result of the fusion, or of the submission of the
Princes of the younger branch to legitimacy? The
count de Chambord would reckon some subjects the
more in the person of those princes, and of some friends
and servants who are personally attached t 3 them.
But the principle of national sovereignty would not be
diminished. France whilst regretting the desertion of

those whom she once called onto refiresent her, would
know how to find other means of maintaining it at the
head of her Government. The fusion, contrary to an
opinion pretty generally disseminated, would really have
this consequence; that the citoyerts who desire to con-
ciliate the principle of the national sovereignty with the
conditions, of a stable Government would rally in great
numbers either to the reiuhl c • r lo the present President.
It would be M. Louis Napoleon Bonaprte and not the
Count de Chambord that the fusion would serve."