The Sun.
London, England, 1850-06-13 00:00:00

IN RE EICKLING.

This bankrupt was described as of Montagtle'reee
Scuthwark, and to-day applied fur his certificate. nci
balance-sheet commences May, 1849, with a defic`ed
of 8251. 139. 6d. :—Dr. 2,4921. ; creditors )300
security, 2,4001.; profits, 6891. ss. 6d. Cr.--,,Tiod
debts, 851.; property, 107/. 12e. 6d.; property inrei:'
of creditors, 2,4001.; losses, 1,0011. 16s. lid.; tra",°, 3
peaces, 860!. 17s. Id.; house and personal, 2631. 14'00,
His HoNoun suspended the certificate for six lnee,„ of
for speculating without capital, the certificate to
the third class.
(Before Mr. Commissioner GOULBURN.)
IN RE STONE. .00
This bankrupt, who had formerly carried on buksi, op
as an oilman in New Oxford-greet, was brought
trona Whitecross.-street Prison, in order to surre.-0v
under the fiat issued against him. Mr. Weston, tcind
street, supported the application. Bankrupt ebsc7ob-
to America, but returned a short time since, e°
tained leave to come up and surrender, which be •
now permit'ed to do,
_ and was discharged.
(Before Mr. Commissioner FANS.) e
IN RE HARTRIDGE. nor ID'
The bankrupt was described as a grocer and drag and
Woodbridge, Suffolk. His debts amount to 1,2081 the
the assets are not sufficient to pay the expenses °
fiat. Soar
HONOUR suspended the certificate for trio
without protection for six months.
A
Y.)
SHERIFFS' COURT.—(THIS
(Before Mr. Under-Sheriff BuncRELL.)
ORD V. HANSARD. r 01. f°t 13
This was an action to recover the sum 0, ,The
rent of apartments in Palace-yard, wouninster.o de-
plaintiff sued as executrix of her late husband, ti„ the
fendant is Mr. Luke James Hansard, printer ;031 to
House of Commons. Defendant sufferedjudgoolt tb.,°
go by default. Evidence was adduced to sbowiltd pal°
rent originally due was 2301., but defendant ..„Pijed t°
1001. in January, 1848, and subsequently prow
pay
The jury found the remainder. d• e •
a verdict for the amount 00°
WHALLEY V. BURNS AND OTIIENS••.00 tO tb:
This was an action on a replevin bond, je/. .0
Sheriff of Warwickshire, in the penal sum °;`, 00
fendants suffered judgment to go by delaws"the
part of the plaintiff, it was contended that sf,srrion,i,
of replevin had been decided against 113esratitie"
person to whom the goods had belonged 11°
the full amount of the penalty of the bond. t only the,
The Learned UNDER SHERIFF held tbs,st aidenet
value of the goods could be recovered, and tLicient tb:f
not,seurb value it
must be given of the value. It was
the bond prcfessed to be given for doubi.n evidenre,o
the goods; for, from certain facts ""ount due 'la
might be inferred that the actual am „...iff Auld
41. 7s. 101 In the absence of evidence, pia.-
only have a verdict for nominal damages.
should stitOci
It was ultimately arranged that she ca'
e
vs'
over for the production of witnesses.
nTo
hn Ls-, vaSsAaNnD
tANOTHERon EXECUTOR,brought
t o
rt: c
vTecrn
I°3' is.prreo•ci; ,t [l°4:
brOu
rent of premises in Ebury-square. It aPP:vd
tLe house had been occupied for two
Years elicitor 05';
and there being rent in arrear, a clerk to a s.act Dove;
collected the rents gave a receipt for Michael 7, for
of Midsummer, and the error was not discore e'
long time afterwards.
Defendant admitted 71. ss. to be due.
The jury gave a verdict for the amount claimed-
A In

CRIMINAL COUIZ.T.—(THIS Pl' '
OLD UOCM.T.
(Before Mr. Baron RotrE.) named
ASSAULTING A POLICEMAN.--A young man
°ju
(Gicorge 'Jackal, described as a shot—maker, 1'55 0,,
I.cted for feloniously cutting and wounding John 5t 0,,
a police-constable, m ith intent to prevent the bait'
stable from arresting hun. a for
' Mr. Ryland, with whom was Mr. Locke, app
rare.
,
tle ,erosecurion, aLd Mr. Payne defended the prisooreiitti
.i,l few weeks ago the prisoner was arrested by a via
police-constable, named Storey, on a warrant charg4,
him with assaulting another constable, named Dr°