The Sun.
London, England, 1850-02-16 00:00:00

EICAY IWAX3E yaws.

SMITHFIELD.—Meadow Hay,l2/ 10si isto: to 1
3/1051;
8s
sopveerr
ditto, 3/ Os to 41 10S ; and Straw, 1
load. A full average supply, and a heavy demand.
CUMBERLAND.—Meadow Hay, 21 106 to 31125; Clover
ditto, 3/ Os to 41 7s ; and Straw, 1/ 2s to 1/ 9s per
lead. Trade dull, at the above quotations.
WHITECHAPEL. Meadow 'lay, 21 85 to 3/ 103 ;
Clover ditto, 3/ 05 to 4/ 10s; and Straw, 1/ is to 1/ 8 per
load. Supply good, and trade dull.

CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY.)
The Lord Chancellor Eat to-day in his Court in the
Old Hall, Lincoln's Inn.

His Lordship was occupied the whole morning with
hearing lunatic petitions, none of which were of the
slightest public interest.

ROLLS' COURT.-(THIS DAY.)
His Lordship the Master of the Rolls sat to-day, for
the first time this week, in his Court in the Rolls-yard,
Chancery-lane. His Lordship, after disposing of the
consent petitions and short causes in his paper, proceeded
to hear the turther arguments in the part-heard case of
Assesses a. Squire, which occupied the remainder of
the morning.

17 I (-7E- C CER T 111 cz DA Y.)
(Baore tllO VICE-CHANCELLOR cf ENGLAND.)
THE RING OF THE TWO SICILIES V. WILLCOX.
The demurrer that had been put in by the defendant

to tho bill was this morning ordered to be overruled by
Isis Honour by the consent of all parties. This couse.,
was adopted in consequence of the course pursued by hi
Honour in the previous case, which Was heard before
him at great length.

NESHA V. ESDAILE.
The further argumentsN were
in this part-heard MO wore
then resumed, and occupied the Court the whole day-
(Before the Vice.-Chancellor KNIGHT 13nucE.)
His Honour heard causes to-day, but no case of boa
slightest public interest came before the Court daring
the whole morning.
( Before the Vice-Chancellor W.. WEAN.>

JONES V. 1101V.-7UDGMENT.
Pis HONOUR gave judgment this morning in this etisei
confirming the certificate of the Court of Comma
and dismissing the hill with costs.
INGERSOLT V. KENDALL. —JUDGMENT. Bering
His Horzourt also gave judgment in this case, 0
Mr. Kendall to pay the costs up to putting -
; in his
answer.

QUEEN'S BENCH. THIS DA`Y:),Id
(Sittings in Banco, before Mr. Justice COLERIDE tE
Mr. Justice ERLE.)
THE QUEEN V. THE LEEDS AND BRADFORD 80-- do
This was a part heard case upon an appeal f ")Ditioe
quarter sessions of the county of York, and the cla,esiine
whether the decendants, in constructing thi or 0.
n
and in reeking certain cuttings, had made such
nient ascents and descents to and from bPa
r.
setting coNn-er
.
secting the line, as they were bound by their Act iris
liament to do. The defendants had been indicts d
/binge)
misdemeanour at the sessions for (among other
making a cutting through a rock upwards of 6"A feet
t
d cents and
wanidthdoeustereinotts to onlyanbd fromalin a publicgmadesn 000fhctn ay d
on,ve
reonssival
the line, as they were bound to do, but had stej
sera
the footway. The walls of the cuttingto der:
perfectly perpendicular, and not sloping, and tea of
fendants had erected a stone parapet wall at
the
the cutting to prevent passengers and cattle straying °
the prt cipice. end ti
be
Mr. TEMPLE, on the part of the defendants, con tieo
that even if they had been guilty of the charge .I','„utbe
to them, their conduct ought not to have been tool" the
subject of an indictment; and if they had not do•ne she
duty imposed upon them by an Act of Parlianiettroho
proper course for the complainants to pursue WO tt-filas
applied to the Court of Queen's Bench fora Into"—
to compel the defendants to discharge their
Mr. Justice ERLE said, if the defendants werfdliasr-
fied in making the cutting through the rock w•'—e•neag
pendicular walls, they would bo justified in tatting,
tparapet e
prevent
personswalls, asthaenydhad cattledone
str
au)!
itt
jhge
intotop oi
rt.
the 4°
Mr. Justice COLERIDGE differed from Mr. ePenieea:
to.,i the proceeding by mandamus instead of ine,c"—; bt
Mr. Temple had thought that because the parties 010,
eclitded from
have proceeded by mandamus they were r
adopting the remedy by ~P Ims Joel',
indictment. He '„„.b
Coleridge) dissented from that position,and thong
complainants were at liberty toelectthir ret
Mr. BALL was addressing the Court for the 191°1
when our report left.

COMMON PLEAS.—(THIS P.`thel:olrd
(Sittings at Nisi Prius, at Guildhall, before '—
Chief Justice
The Court disposed of several cases this rnortun.' bet
none of them presented any feature of interest. giceS
(Sittings in Banco, at Westminster, before ''onti
iIAULE, CRESSWELL, WILLIAMS, and TAtioll,
HOWARD V. SHEPHARD.
ued by gr.
This was a case of a demurrer
Cowley. Mr. Hill appeared for T pleashe de arg Ibis
fendsor' nas to
case arose out of a fraudulent consignment of ign°-, and
the defendant at Bombay, by an agent in Erlo-ti 019
the action was brought by the real consignee' °The
refusal of the defendant to deliver up the goods.
arguments in this case lasted the entire moren3g.

EXCHEQUER.—(THIS DAY') ihe
(Sittings at Nisi Prins, at Westminster, before
LORD CHIEF BARON and a Special Jury)
CHARTIST LAND SCHEME•

O'CONNOR V. BRADSHAW. h ge.
The trial of this case, which has excited so Wines od
neral interest, especially among the working cia,,s,s, sous
the adherents of the Chartist body throughout
try, was resumed again this morning. art of die
Mr. ROEBUCK addressed the jury on the Pa which
in reply to the additional evideuee
that
had been tendered by the plaintiff, contenclinfes of
ample evidence had been given to prove the Pe libel'
in regard to the publication of th length
'The Learned Gentleman went at considerable
eosi
into the facts which had been deduced, and cchlfoad tit
in somewhat strong terms upon those which siet-getlier
bear out the assertion that the company was 8-ts feN
illegal. The scheme, he said, had emanated fro ho jet
persons whose names they did not know, 190„."105elics
in a room somewhere in London, and called but Oaf
delegates from the working classes of England' "-as al
roe taresotea
were as much entitled to claim that cha
three tailors of Tooley-street, who reP;
themselves as the people of Engl'lll,V Brut
justified in claiming a position of an or With
importance. Ile charged Mr. O'Cnallii,ba been
4vtrything contained in the paper which f yule"defamed by being called a libel, and the truth of
had been made as plain and clear to them a5,...e0, that
shine en a bright summer-day. When they :i:
more than 100,000/. had been collected bY sofas'
if.nrosmomtte
iva,-,(s)traknincegspeevoynleasuftrtihileincoussifY, by 9."-Ce
came their duty to guard them ffolu
posture, and by God's blessing he trusted they
red
It had turned out that all thi ay had been recd
that
by Mr. O'Connor, and been bait: into his P!,-11
account, and no one but himself could now deal with
account,
If he had dropped down dead every farthing Nycnin irbg
gone to his representatives, and every poor ran", bill
had subscribed his three-pence would have to fiieu
iu Chancery, in order to get back his payments.
WO
said he had made a will, making over everything: con"
tibcorpeocs-Pitiona :1111:1:
subscribers; but he could as easily have executed him
veyAnce of property to each allottee, and thus givef roe
a legal right, which be could not otherwise balvey as
bossed. lie had throughout dealt with the 131°' tea'
his own, and whatever remained now i 3 C°ll'
gible form was under his sole power an.,,,tivea
trol, and no person could interfere with it. The' (NU'
d his nil
of such procepdiugs were plain and simple, 50-.,-ne
Roebuck's) client claimed the right of deacrl",el-4; f'ict
denouncing it as a piece c,f political imposition. got
wits as clear as daylight, that Mr. O'Connor bahrough
other people's money, and was endeavouring, tr ei or
the instrumentality of the five hundred mac way the
branches of the association to influence and $01:1 °lke)
popular will. What might hereafter haPPeukolbac-a's
money it was impussible to sa but he (slar',,`"icerig'i
could tell themes hat might be thyCultimateraV7,;
happen that the plaintiff would keep it 1'; of ",..!
Could they doubt that? The beginning and d3e
,1";
company was Mr. O'Connor, and nobody eisct„oifie'
deuce had shown this; and were they Dc't,-e-bart3e„teb
putting their fingers on this great blot on t"L'a In /3e-aed
of a public man, and calling him an impostor' blic; -of
a case the press was the eye and voice of thc,fleelin.esecl
if public men tampered with the money 0" f, for? sir
the people, it was the duty of the press to st,er
ell
and tear asunder the veil, and. to expose, elhael be
enormity, the abuses and malpractises which
of She perpetrated. at ur
Mr. WILEINS was then heard on the Pa-when °u
plaintiff, but had not concluded his address
report left.

BOW-STREET.—(THIS,,,P„j9.IIISS
A middle-aged man named John 0-4"--"
eateci
charged with embezzlement. 0013 „
~
in
The prisoner, who was said to be MP'," clorPv
with families in Ireland, was, up till recentlY, the per.,`":
the employ of Messrs. Dodand and Ce-y;
clothiers of St. Martin's-lane at a salary' eiti;
per week, and on the 4th of at
resent xnea"; tot
d-r
sent to the Commercial Bank withptwo clietle-'e°oeiL
401. and the other for 91., to get cashed. s' but ve
the money from the Bank on the same day' tioo v"--„!
returned with it to his employers, and jeforwrrAhe f°l-c-t
given to the police of his han Ibsconded•
had accordingly been on the gwatch for b 00 I.
night the prisoLer rendered any further trouble 13oir
point unnecessary by giving himself up at aloe Mt ho
;
street station. lie was drunk at the time, Black'a al3OO
ing the station he said to Mr. Inspector iby;
was on duty there, *•My name is John 31-10,e,$r. ilclCo',l
know me. I stole 491. from Messrs. Dollane 'cbed,b.;
and I now wish to give myself up." He Wes Itifirpoe
nothing more than a single penny was fount' cipat'ijo
Subsequently he told the inspector that he 1313,,,ivg,.„i° he
the money in drink and dissipation, but on °b.-8 0,-;,ai
senses this morning, and discovering whet° h do'r-h d
seemed anxious to deny the truth of what be ac-ilators had
, 00
stated. It was too late, however, as the p.- tide •
eU b
been communicated with in the meantime, el 3 of etti
appeared against him to support the nhgrge -
ziing the produce of the 40/
The prisoner said nothing,. qucahnedhee. was oily COmnit
'Cr trial.

Six,
—ln
THE EDITOR OF THE Siff ifirealleirb
(see Italy) :—"
your well-known news
the
I\bd lya iyl a sendinglri journal -1: Opera).* in which ging' `...,„. At
Emmanuel is moat ' obsero.v
grossly calumniated, (loan
the same; .•
me, time that under a constitutional "" t such
languageburinAmbassadorMr.a
as that of the paper alluded to, P'', been
a under the regime of martial law, must bl.„ %
don't
least connived at by the local Goveranienur in'
ib
ithremation, but as I was one of the two reds fact,
herc-mentioned Operajo,l rectify the '
can
and assure you— Nisi ti"
Ist
, . That the Operajo (dated from 13th
~_ or
the 3d of August, 1848, three days before the
trance of Radetzky into Milan) was neither
__irn
or published under a martial law, or an ii-t"
Government.
2d. That in the Operajo there is net a
about the actual King of Piedmont. r beia
It is true, however, that the aforesaid PaPe Mi-
in great demand, was clandestinely reprinted in
erlio
a naP
lan after the arrival of the Austrians ; 809 r r the
I can conjecture that the Sardinian Ministeuid be
Marquis Mastrino d'Azeglio, has thought it W° denounce
convenient to him, and even honourale, to d den
the thing to his friend the Austrian Ambassaor.
I a ''
m, bit., yours very truly, irvait
GENII Y LA- , --- a'o.
Ex.co-editor of the Oper
Hereford Lodge, Old Brompton.