The Sun.
London, England, 1844-06-01 00:00:00

by the common law courts of the realm. He challenged ; next week, and when the Bank Chatter Bill would be
the Solicitor-General to point out a single instance in proceeded with.
which this was not the case, and he also challenged the Sir R. PEEL said it was most inconvenient to men-
Right Hon. Baronet to instance any case which was tion any time, but he would say the 10th.
cognizable by the ecclesiastical courts that was not also he other Orders of the a
Q day were then disposed of,
cognizable by the common law courts. and the House adjourned at n.
Sir R. PEEL said the Hon. and Learned Gentleman
was very pugnacious.—(Laughter.) As the Hon. and
Learned Gentleman had appealed to him, he could only
say that jurisdictions had been established for the
purpose of maintaining order, independent of the courts
of common law. Now, for instane, the Speaker of the
House of Oommsna exercised a jurisdiction for main-
taining order (Hear, hear,)—and he (Sir R. Peel) had
never heard that a court of common law could punish a
Member for a breach of order in that House.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said that his Hon.
and Learned Friend was certainly well acquainted with
one portion of the law of the land, and that was the
law of peremptory challenge.—(Hear, bear.) His Hon.
and Learned Friend had challenged him to instance a
case which could not be made the subject of an indictment
at common law, but which could be brought before the
ecclesiastical courts. He had already given one instance,
which was that of a man sitting with his hat on in church
during Divine service, and he would have thought that
many other instances would have suggested them-
selves to the Hon. and Learned Gentleman him-
self. Why, there was the subject of brawling itself.
That offence might occur when no congregation was
assembled, and it was only an ecclesiastical offence in
such a case by reason of the sacredness of the place.
The Hon. and Learned Gentleman knew that for such
an offence there could be no civil or criminal proceeding
in the common law courts.—(Hear, hear.) He thought
he had answered the challenge of the lion. and Learned
Member for Bath, by adducing this instance, and he was
Are that others must occur to his ingenuity. With re-
gard to the Hon. and Learned Member for Kinsale,. he
had dealt with him in all courtesy, but he must, of course,
be allowed to retain his 'own opinion.
Strangers were then ordered to withdraw, and the
Reuse divided, when there appeared,
For the amendment 6l
Against it
Majority against the amendment —4B
Sir G. GREY proposed an amendment in the clause,
taking from the ecclesiastical courts the power of impo-
sing church-rates.
Dr. NICHOLL said he could not accede to the amend-
ment. At present there was no other jurisdiction what-
ever to decide the question of the validity of church.
rates except the ecclesiastical courts, and, at any rate,
until that objection were removed, he would not consent
to the proposal.
After a few observations 'from Mr. COLLETT and
Dr. NICHOLL the House divided on the amendment,
when' there appeared—
For the amendment
• Against it
.Majority against the amendment —4l
Oti our admission to the 'gallery, we found
Mr. BULLER on his legs moving an amend-
ment to the clause, that all testamentary matters
should be taken from the jurisdiction of the ecclesiasti-
cal courts and given to the civil courts. As a specimen
of the necessity of such a provision, 'he would refer to
the will of-Mr. James Wood of Gloueester. The question
upon that will, after going through the prerogative courts,
went to the Privy Council, where the will was held to be
good, though it was considered bad in the court below.
The imperfection of the jurisdiction of the 'Ecclesiastical
Court was, a great, absurdity. It decided only on the
general question of the' validity of the will it could not
adjudge any point connected with separate bequests, the
administration was obliged to be conducted by the Court
of Chancery. This was a` great anomaly, and he had
the opinion of the best property lawyers of the kingdom
for saying; that it ought to be abolished. These Courts
kept up a limited bar, a legal monopoiy of the business
of attorneys, under the name of proctors, wlio were
alone. allowed to practise in them, and 'which had
merely the • effect of loading clients with additional
fees, for persons always entrusted their business• to their
own solicitors, who conducted it through a proctor; and
the effect of the monopoly was only to create a bad bar,
bad attorneys, and bad judges. The mode of taking
evidence" by these courts was also very. objectionable;
there were many modes of taking evidence' in this
country ; in the common law courts it was done viva
voce ; in the equity courts it was taken in writing. But
the ecclesiastical courts had hit on a mode that cotn-
oined the disadvantages of both without the advantages
of either. There was one defence of these courts which
he must allude to; it was often said that it Was-necessary
to keep up a body -of civilians, Who, raising themselves
Mr above the merelaw. of England, would devote them-
selves to those • great...prineiples- •of international law
which sometimes came-to be argued-before the Court of
Admiralty. Now, he did not wish to- speak disrespect-
fdlly of the doctors; he merely wished to put an-end to
them altogether—(A laugh)—and he should wish to do
that in a manner that would be the least disrespectful• to
their feelings.—(Laughter) But he really thought it
monstrous that this body' should be kept up for this pur-
pose at the expense of the suitors in these-courts. It
would be better that they should be salaried and sup-
ported in some kind of school for the purpose—if it was
of any use to the country. It was said that
it was necessary there should be a body- of
men versed in the principle of the Roman law.
Now the Spanish law involved the principles of the Ro-
man law to a great extent ; so did the Scotch law. Now
if there was this great proficiency among the doctors of
the eclesiastical courts in this Roman kw, they would
be required in the House of Lords when qstestions in-
volving its principles came before it. But was--this the
case ? He might appeal to the • Learned Doctors in -the
House to say whether the public did not always trust to
the counsel taken from the other courts ' they scarcely
ever saw a doctor retained on appeals before the. House
of Lords. He need not go into all the details of the sub-
ject, but should Conclude by moving his amendment.
-Dr. NICHOLL, -in opposing the amendment, said,
neither the House nor the public would consent-to trans-
fer the jurisdiction of these courts to the courts of com-
mon law, unless it could be satisfactorily shown that, up
to the present time, the business in them had -been in-
eilficieutly conducted, .or that the change. would be
attended with some . singular advantage to the public.
He believed that their business had heenswell con-
ducted, and conflicting., decisions between the ec-
clesiastical and common .law were extremely rare.
The ecclesiastical courts merely decided the question as
to whether the will propounded was the-real will of the
deceased. The construction to be placed upon that'
will was decided by other courts, and it certainly was"
convenient that these, questions should be decided by
different tribunals. • He therefore thought that it would
be well that this jurisdiction should be. reserved to the
ecclesiastical courts.
Mr. WATSON thought they ought to have some
mercy upon the public at large. It was 'all very well
for ecclesiastical lawyers, common law lawyers, and chan-
cery lawyers to wish to have a share in the plunder of
the estate of an unfortunate deceased, but really he
thought the public had a right to expect that all these
questions should, be decided by one tribunal.--a(Cheers.)
Now he would put a case. Suppose the Hon. and Learned
Geutleman opposite made his will in these terms,ogfl
give and devise.all my. estate, real and personal, to-A.8."
Lord STANLEY—To iktr..W.atsuu,—(A laugh.)
Mr. WATSON. was .much obliged to the Noble Lord
for the suggestion.—(Cheers and laughter.) , :Well, the
Hon. and Learned Gentleman was. gathered to- his
fathers, andahen the will was to be proved in Doctors'
Commons. Then commenced the most expensive part
of the most expensive system known in this most expen-
sive country. Formerly, there was an inventory pub-
lished of the property for the information of all the parties
concerned ; that, however, was now abolished, in order
that the .Chancery lawyers, and the common lawyers
might get their share of the plunder.- Well, the will was
- disputed—the sanity of , the testator was called
In question. Then another system of law came into
operation. The common Jaw lawyers came in: In this
stage of the proceeding the only legitimate mode of
getting at the truth of a question' was adopted. They
examined witnesses who gave their testimony viva
race, and were subjected to the test: of cross-
examination. Now, this ' course might be -adopted
any time within nineteen years of • the. death .of
the testator, although the, estate might have. been sold
feur or five -times over. It. ought to be known by
country gentlemen, that when they -devised their
estates, those devises were open to. litigation for a
period of nineteen years, 164 days,. and -some hours.
At length the matter was carried into Chancery, where
thearassaftef the will were to.be litigated. At this time of
a day as end ought to- be put to this expensive, tedious,
and unmeaning sort of jurisdiction. The Right Hon.
Gentleman admitted, that the jdry was the .properstri-
tunal in one case ; then why should there. not-be' one
tribunal teslegislata fur all? At present the ecclesias-
tical court had one opinion about a will, thescourts at
Westminster-hall another, and the Court:of. Chancery.
the Lord knows what ; so that the suitor was:in a eon-
stant state of perpletity and doubt. ' -•
Mr. JERVIS opposed , the motion of the Hon. and
Learned Member for Liskeard, who he-could not-think,
was
-serious in introducing it on this occasion
ca with. any
hope of carrying it. - •
ciaAjlmre.dllsoUruMuE:hwondered .that therse.persons. swhoi ex-
Pope should cling • so. tena-
ciously to this abctrastion. No sane man •cntild, object:
to the ecclesiastical courts being deprived oft due-species
of power.
Vit,F.
... Dr. ELPHINSTONE supported the amendinent,4nd.
said that he thought the Bill would do more
good. lima than
Mr. - ROEBUCK thought: a system of tegi6.tration
would be very salutary, but he doubted that such could
be, rendered:eenapatiblewith the present constitution of
the ecclesiastical law. He would support t.he motion of
the Hon. Member for Liskeard.
Mr. C. BTlLLERreplied.
, The Committee,then divided, w linn there appeared
For the motion • 58
Against it
Majority against the motion —63
On our return to the. gallery we found that it had
issan moved by Mr. Brothertons that the Chairman do
report progress, and ask leave to sit again.:'
Sir ROBERT PEEL said this was the first day of
their meeting ,after the recess, and. he thought the Go-
vernment ought to be allowed to congratulate themselves
upon having passed end '
. The Committee then divided, when there appeared,
For report of progress •
- Against it r.
Majority. , —43
Dr. BOWTtING then moved that the Speaker do
Yeas e the chair,
. The Committee divided,' when there appeared, •
For the motion, • '
Against it...

FRIDAY NIGIIT'S GAZETTE.
.
CROWN-OFFICE, MAY 30,1844.
MEUSERS RETURNED TO SLAVE IN THIS ZAZSENT TAR-
Lill/ENT.
BOROUGH or Bucietuousze.—The Right Hon. Sir Thomas
Francis Fremantle, Bart. ..
CITY or CHESTER,—The Right Hun. Arthur Lennox, cons..
monly called Lord Arthur Lennox.
WAR-OFFICE, MAY 31. -
6th Dragoons--Lieut. H. Stone, from 37th Foot, to be
Lieutenant, vice Fleeraing, who exchanges, May 31.
9th Light Dragoons—Cornet A. Hawtrey to be Lieutenant,
by purchase, vice Colville, promoted in the Royal Canadian
Rifle Regiment ; C. F. Clifton, Gent., to be Cornet, by pur-
chase, vice Hawtrey, May 31.
15th Light Dragoons—Cornet W. B. L. Sleigh to be Lieu-
tenant, by purchase, vice Norton, who retires ; W. V. Greet-
ham, Gent., to be Cornet, by purchase, vice Sleigh, May 31.
Ist Regiment of Foot—Captain and Paymaster J. Espinasse,
from 29th Foot, to be Paymaster, vice Sharp, deceased,
May 31.
2d Foet—F. J. F. Payne, Gent., to be Assistant-Surgeon,
vice Hunter, promoted on the Staff, May 31.
3d Foot—Assistant-Surgeon A. Smith, .from the 17th Foot,
to be Surgeon, vice Macqueen, deceased, May 31.
17th Foot—Assistant-Surgeon J. S. Wines, M.D., from
the Staff, to be Assistant-Surgeon, vice Smith, promoted in
the 3d Foot, May 31.
27th Foot—J. R. H. Becher, Gent., to be Ensign, by pur-
chase, vice Hamilton, who retires, May 31.
29th Foot—Lieut. J. H. Clay, from 59th Foot, to be Pay-
master, vice Espinasse, appointed to the Ist Foot, May 31.
37th Foot—Lieut. J. E. Deeming, from the 6th Dragoons,
to be Lieutenant, vice Stone, who exchanges, May 31.
46th Foot—Ensign J. E. Spilling to be Lieutenant, without
purchase, vice Moffatt, deceased, April 3; Ensign H. F. Sand-
with to be be Lieutenant without purchase, vice Spilling,
whose promotion, on 26th April, 1844, his been cancelled,
April 26 ; J. H. Chambers, Gent., to be Ensign, without pur-
chase, vice Sandwith, May 31.
47th Foot—R. C. Gordon, Gent. to be Ensign, by pur-
chase, vice Peacock, who retires, May 31.
49th Foot—Lieutenant H. S. M. D. Fulton, from 62d Foot,
to be Lieutenant, vice Bartley, who exchanges, May 31.
52d Foot—R. W. Reade, M.D., to be Assistant Surgeon,
vice Robinson, appointed to the Staff, May 31.
62d Foot—Lieutenant W. T. Bartley, from 49th Foot, to
be Lieutenant, vice Fulton, who exchanges, May 31.
70th Foot—Captain J. Brown to be Major, by purchase,
vice Taylor, who retires; Lieutenant W. R. B:ereton to be
Captain, by purchase, vice Brown ; Ensign G. A. Schreiber
to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Brereton ; G. Ryan,
Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Schreiber, May 31.
73d Foot—Lieut. W. B. Faunce to be Captain, purchase,
vice Sandernan, who retires ; Ensign C. Hoghton to be Lieu.
tenant, by 'purchase, vice Faunce ; W. Nash, Gent., to be
Ensign, by purchase, vice Hoghton, May 31.
Rifle Brigade—Captain R. Walpole to be Major, by pur-
chase, vice Saumarez, promoted; Lieutenant H. 0. Bowles to
be Captain, by purchase, vice Walpole ; Second Lieutenant J.
F. Beckwith to be First Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Bowles;
A. Lowther, Gent., to be Second Lieutenant, by purchase,
vice Beckwith, May 31.
• Royal Canadian Rifle Regiment--Lieutenant C. J. Colville,
from the 9th Light Dragoons, to be Captain, by purchase, vice
Edwards, May 31.
UNATTACHED.—Brevet Colonel the HO2. C. Gore, from
Major half-pay Unattached, to be Lieutenant-Colonel, without
purchase. Major the Hon. J. St. Vincent Saumaurez, from
the Rifle Brigade, to be Lieutenant-Colonel by purchase, vice
General A. J. Goldie, who retires. Brevet Colonel W. Camp-
bell, from Captain- half-pay 23d Foot, to be Major, without
purchase, May 31.
BREVET.—Major A. M. Tulloch, half-pay Unattached, Mi-
litary Superintendent of Out-Pensioners, to be. Lieut.-Colonel
in the Army, May 31.
HOSPITAL STAFF.--;ASSiStallt-Surgeon W. Robinson, M.D.,
from 52d Foot, to be Assistant-Surgeon to .the Forces, vice
Willis, appointed to 17th Foot, May 31.
Messoaesionst.—The Christian names of Ensign Coles, o
Ist Foot, are Richard George, and not Thomas George, as
previously stated.
OFFICE OF ORDNANCE, MAY 28.
Royal Regiment of Artillery—First Lieutenant C. L. Fitz-
gerald. to be Second Captain, vice Robertson, deceased ; Secon d
Lieutenant H. A. Vernon to be First Lieutenant, vice Fitz-
gerald, May 15.
• Mesionaivnust.-e-The dates of promotion of the under-
Mentioned officers have been altered as follow :—Second Cap-
tain P. Maclean, April 14 ; Second Captain A. Benn, April
15 ; Second Captain R. M. Mundy, April 28 ; First Lieu-
tenant Honourable W. C. Yelverton,, April 14 ; First Lieu-
tenant S.. Robinson, April 15 ; First Lieutenant M. S.
Biddulph, April 28.
I . WHITEHALL, MAY 27.
The Lord Chancellor has appointed William Bickley, of
Sheffield, in the county of York, Gent., to be a Master Extra-
ordinary in the High Court of Chancery.
DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY.
' WILLIAM KEMP, tailor, Waltham, Lincolnshire.
'BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED.
JOSEPH RIDGWAY, fringe manufacturer, Chester.
BANKRUPTS.
BENJAMIN LAND, victualler, Hertford, to surrender
June 7, at half-past eleven, and July 12, at eleven, at the
Court of Bankruptcy. Alsager, official assignee, Birchin-lane,
Cornhill ; Roche, Plowman, and Roche, Upper Wellington-
Street, Covent-garden.
i WILLIAM DETHICK, lime merchant, Temple-street,
Whitefriars, June 14, at one, and July 12, at twelve, at the
Court of Bankruptcy. Whitmore, official assignee, Basing-
hall-street; Humphrey, Keightly, and Co., Chancery-lane.
I, HENRY RICHARD HARRADEN, priiitseller, Cam-
bridge, June 11 and July 16, at eleven, at the Court of Bank-
kuptcy. Pennell, official assignee, Basinghall-street ; Tarrant,
Walbrook ; Lawrence, Cambridge.
QUIROGA BOLIVAR VITTORIA, JOHN ANI-
HMI, merchant, St. 13enet's-plice, Gracechurch-street,
une 7, and July 2, at half-past twelve, at the Court of. Bank-
ruptoy. Belcher, official assignee, King's Arms-yard Moor-
gate-street; Cloves and Wedlake, King's-bench-walk.
JOHN WHITLY MARDALL, insurance broker, New
!4lioreliam, Sussex, June 11, and July 16, at one, at the Court
pf flaAsuptey. Belcher, official assignee, King's Arms-yard,
Aloorgatel;freet I Rolfe and Edmunds, South-square, Gray's
inn • Edmunds, Worthing, Sussex.
EMANUEL TYNTALE, wine merchant, Ross, Hereford-
shire, June 7, at twelve, and July 5, at eleven, at the Bir-
mingham District Court. Valpy, official assignee, Birmingham ;
Washbouriie, Gloucester ; Hall and Minett, Ross ; Stubbs awl
Rollingi, Birmingham.
' JOHN MITCHELL, coal merchant, Nottingham, June 10,
nd July 11, at eleven; at., the Birmingham District Court.
ittleston, official assignee, Birmingham; Cann, Nottingham ;
mith, Birmingham.
THOMAS NEWTON, cattle-dealer,- Holbeach, Lincoln:
hire, June 11, it one, 'and July 5; at twelve, at the Binning-
am District Csurt. Valpy, official assignee, Birmingham ;
taniland, Boston ; Barker and Sons, Birmingham.
ROBERT BAXTER, merchant, Sheffield, June 13, and
tidy 6, at eleven, at the Leeds District Court. Fearne,
fficial assignee, Leeds; Fiddey, Temple, London ; Wilson,
,Younge, and Pierson, Sheffield.
I FREDERICK. LANE HOMER, merchant, Manchester,
une 14, and July 4, at one, at the Manchester District Court.
°trim, official assignee, Manchester; BI ickhurne, Leeds;
dward and Robert William Bennett, Manchester.
~
THOMAS' BEECH, grocer, Neticastle:Under-Lyme, June
0, and July 11, at eleven, at the Birmingham District Court.
1 hitmore. official assignee, Birmingham ; Stanier, Newcastle-
'under-Lyme ; Smith. Birmingham.
WILLIAM LYNN, hotel keeper, Liverpool, June 12, at
twelve, and; July 2, at eleven, at the Liverpool District Court.
plorgan, official assignee, Liverpool; Littledale and Bardswell,
iverpool ; Vincent and Sherwood, Temple, London.
JOSEPH OWEN and SARAH OWEN, merchants, Shef-
eld, June' 15, and July 3, at elevea, at the Leeds District
curt. - Young, official assignee, Leeds ; Biggs, Southampton.
uildingi, London; Haywood and Bramley, Sheffield; Bran-
on, Sheffield:
. ' NOTICES OF INSOLVENCY.
. M. Danels, schoolmistreis, Turnharn-green.
. Perkin, victualler, Bollington, Cheshire. • •
.1. E. Adams, schoolmaster, workhouse, Marylebone.
,G. Parker, coal dealer, Norwich.
E. Phillipps, Albany-street, Regent's Park. ,
H. Jennings, Princes-road, Lambeth. .
W. Jones, saddler, Litchborough, Northamptonshire.
!J. Reed, shoemakef, Chearn, Surrey. .
IJ. W. Newton, farmer, Moulton, Lincolnihire. '
R. Newton, farmer,- Moulton, Lincolnshire. .
G. E. Green, Whalley, Lancashire:,
I
D. Roberts,Roberts,itationee, Manchester.
iT. Singleton, druggist, Sheffield. '
J. Lonshottom, woolcomber, Wainstell, Yorkshire.
lE. Altif4and, assistant to a publican, Liverpool.
IJ. Jshnson, bricklayer, Huddersfield. -
J. Mathews, tallow chandler, Hammersmith.
1:J. Seeger, undertaker, Wood-street, Lembeth-Walk.
, P. Beer, tobacconist, Plymouth.
H. Silley, Shaftesbury-street, New North-road.
H. J. Murton, lieutenant-colonel R. 51., Brornpton.
J. Robinson, boot maker, Charlotte-street, Portland-place,
' C. Morgan, assistant grocer, Brompton.
-J. Jenkins, painter, Praed-street, Paddington. • •
W. H. Jones, cordwainer, Kidderminster.
W. B. Plummer, slopseller, St. Alban's.
IR. Thomas, victualler, Hertford, ,
T. Ta3lOr, sen., brickmaker, Aston, Warwickshire.
E. Maltby, Sneinton; Nottinghamshire. .
G. A. Penton, commission agent, Salamanca-cottages, Chelsea
: G. S. Mann, eating-housekeeper, Bucklersbury. .
H. Dale, baker, Worthing, Sussef. _
W. W. Bradly, elerk, St. Jamei-cOttage, Old'Kent-road.
E. Edwards, builder,•Gravesend. ..
J. Johnson, tobacconist, Coburg-place, Old Kent-road:
J. Riches,,printer, Norwich.
T. H. Johnson, traveller; Shepperton-street, Islington.
W. Blake-, carp.enter, Elizabeth-place; Upper Holloway.
J. Townsend, jun., undertaker's assistant, Charlton.
A: Norfolk, porter, Red-hill, Surrey.
J; Huntingdon; builder, LiverpOol. .
J. 1. Mitchell, tea dealer, Gloucester.
G.- Habbijam, jun., Cumberland-street East, Regent's-park.
J. Price, jun., grocer, Cotton-street, Poplar. .
L. R. Mackintosh, Cleeve, GlOncestershire.
W. S. Preston, broker, Rupert•street,.Westininstee.
W. Francis, farm steward, Llanelly, Carmarthenshire.
T. Carter, shopkeeper, Walcot, Somersetshire.
E. Garnham, butcher, London-road. • ' -
SECOND NOTICES. . -.
R. Pond, working cutler, Bell-street, Edgewue-road, June
6, at two, at the Court of Bankrnptcy. Belcher, official as.
signee. ' .
R. H. Thurston, Norwich, June 6,-at eleven,' at the Court
of Bankruptcy. Alsager, official assignee: '':, , 1
A. C. Bulley, landing waiter, Barriard-street,- Russell-
square, June 6, at two, at the Court- of -Bankruptcy. ' Whit.:
more, official assignee. . . . _ .
T, Nixon, plumber, Kettering, Northamptonshire,' June 6;
at two, at the Court of Bankruptcy. - Alsager, official assignee.
A. Smith, tailor, Bungay, Suffolk, June' 6, at two, at the
Court
. of .Bankruptcy. Whitmore, official assignee.- ..
Court ' chemist, Harwich, June 6, at one, at the
t Bankruptcy. Alsager official assignee. -
W, o
Pitito,Warehousemin's assistant; St. George's-buildings
Horton.s ,
pare, June 6, at half-past one; aithe Court of Bank.
' half-past °'tegey's."-r:°llAls' cl'agjenr.n,ioffi6icia-atl
J. Bonython, furniture brokerSaiisfiury-street,' Portman.
market, J une 6, at half; past two, at the
.Court-: of .Bankruptcy.
Alsager, official assignee.
G. Taylor, foreman, Meredith-street, Clerkenwell, June 6,
at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy, , ,A,lsager,Olficial assignee.
E. Dolley, manufacturing perfumer; Meard's-court, Soho,
June 6, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Whitmore
official assignee.
B. J. Deane, lucifet manufacturei, Sidney-street, Gilmer:.
cial-road, June. 6, at- half-past one, at the Court of. Bankruptcy.
Whitmore, official assignee.
J. Brown, cabriolet proprietor, Duke's-mews; Lissonfgrove,
June 6, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Groom, official
assignee. • .
G. Sinith slate quarry igent Llanbeblik . Cari*rvonsbire,

Majority against the motion ... —43
• The CHAinstix then reported progress, by consent,
:and the.llouse thea proceeded with the other Orders of
the Day.
Mr. IIIJAI:E -said that us serierid bills had been post-
venvd, he•,wvixbod to 11.n.ow_whatt measurea woad wine on