The Sun.
London, England, 1850-08-13 00:00:00

ISLAND OF JERSEY.

Mr. HUME asked Sir G. Grey whetter any measures
had been adopted by the Government of the island ( f
Jersey to carry into effect the alterations recommended
by the Commissioners that inquired and reported on the
state of law in that island?

Sir GEORGE GREY said the Government of the
island, in accordance with the recommendations of the
Commissioners, had made some very material alterations
in the criminal law, and those alterations, in com-
pliance with the usual course pursued on such occa-
sions, had been referred to the Attorney and Scli-
citor•General, and they were at present undar their
consideration; and be had no doubt they would devote
that time and attention to them which the importance
and magnitude of the subject demanded.

THE RIVER PLATE.
Mr. SMYTHE asked the Foreign Secretary whether
there was any objection to lay before Parliament copies of
instructions to Mr. Hood, senior, Lord Howden, Captain
Gore, Mr. Hood, junior, and Mr. Southern, some-
time agents in La Plata ; whether our relations
with France in La Plata were of such a nature as to
afford any hope of a successful issue from the offer of
our good offices made in the third article of the new
Convention; and whether security to the lives and pro-
perty of British subjects residing in the Banda Oriental
had been guaranteed?
Lord PALMERSTON replied, that as the instruc-
tions which had been sent out in regard to the affairs
of La Plata had concluded in a treaty, it would not be
consistent with his public duty to produce the cor-
respondence, because it was obvious great inconveni-
ence might arise from such a course. That
treaty he considered to be very satisfactory. With re-
gard to our relations with France, the Govern-
ment had thought it better for the interest
of all parties to conclude their treaty with
General Rosas and the Argentine Republic without
waiting the result ef the ragotiations which were going
on at the time in France. As regarded the security
afforded to British subjects, he had not the slightest ap-
prehension that their persons or property would be sub-
ject to any danger.
A messenger appeared at the table, and brought up
from the House of Lords the Duke of C4mbridge s
Estate Bill, agreed to by their Lordships.
PROGRESS OF PUBLIC BUSINESS.
Sir B. HALL then rose to call the attention of the
House to a return headed " Public Bills," lately
printed by order of the House, with the view of making
some observations in regard to the progress of public business during the present session, in the hope that mat
session their time would be better occupied. He might
state at the outset, he thought, without fear,
of contradiction, that in no previous cession, since the
passing of the Reform Act, had there le, en a more anxi-
ous desire to transact and get through the business.
During the whole session they had sat 1,041 hours, had
held 149 sittings, over a space of twenty-five weeks, ex-
clusive_of holidays, and, averaging 100 hours for the

13, 1850.

Wednesday sietings, this gate 10:1 hours a day
for four days a week during the whole ses-
sion. Ad this via, exclusive of 'Committer,
work, to which most Hon. Members were dilieed to at-
tend. he thought it woide be advisable if, during the
recess, Government were to consider the sutject and in
die next session being fhrwerd seine suggestions which
should have the of act, of remedying ties of which he
complained. Laity ear the House set 932 hours, and
the Government passed eiehty•nine Bills, whilst this
.1 ear up to the Ist of August they had only passed
fifty-eight. The Hon. Baronet then called the attention
of the House to a return of the name or title of every
public Bill ordered to be brought in during the present
session of Parliament, the date of such order, the dates
of the first reading, and the several stages of each Bill,
and the dates of every postponement between each stage
of the Bid, up to Wednesday, the 31st cf July inclusive.
This return showed the number of Bills brought in by
the Government to be ninety-five. The Appointment so
Office Bill was read a first time on the 9th of
July, a second time on the 12th July, and
the Committee was deferred fire times. The Australian
Colonies Government Bill was read a first time on the
11th of February, said passed through on the 6th of May.
The Bsick Duties Bill was brought in on the 18th of
March, and passed without much opposition. The
Charitable Trusts Bill was brought in on the Bth of Fe-
bruary, the second reading was deferred eleven times,
the Committee thirteen times, the B:11 was considered as
amended lour times, the third reading deferred five
times, and lingered through the House till the 25th July.
The Chief Justices Salaries Bill was brought in on the
11th March, the Committee was deterred twice, there
were 11 other postponements, and nothing more was
heardot it till the lit ufAugust. Now he wished to remind
the House that the Government had always carried any
Bill when they evinced a determination to do so, and as
a proof of this he would refer to the Duke of Cambridge's
Annuity Bill, whilst in other cases delays innumerable
had taken place. A great deal of time had been spent
iu the introduction of Bills which were never intended to
be carried. The Fees (Court of Chancery) Bill was in-
troduced on the 25th of April; the second reading was
deferred three times; the Committee 14 times; and on
25th of July it was withdrawn. The Highways Bill was
introduced on the 13th February; the Committee was
deferred 13 times; and on the 12th July it was with-
drawn. The Incorporation of Boroughs Confirmation
Bill was withdrawn under similar circumstances. The
Landlord and Tenant Bill was introduced on the 14th
FehrtAry, deferred 15 times, and nothing more was
heard of it till the Ist August. The Lord-Lieutenancy
Abolition Bill was brought in on the 17th May, and read
a second time on the 17th June, and agreed to almost
unanimously; and yet it was withdrawn on the 4th
July. But the Marlborough House Bill, which was
introduced on the 30th July, was about to become law.
The Mercantile Marine Bill was introduced on II th
Feb., the second reading was deferred five times, and
the Bill was then withdrawn and another introduced.
The Merchant Seamen's Fund Bill was .introduced on
the I Ith Feb., the second reading was deferred
fifteen times, and it was withdrawn on the Bth July. The
Merchants Shipping Bill was brought in on the same
day, deterred five times, and withdrawn on the 19th April.
The Metropolitan Interments Bill was introduced on the
15th April, and passed on the 20th June, the Govern-
meet showing a determination to carry it through. The
Oath of Abjuration (Jews) Bill was brought in on the
30th May, the second reading was deterred four times,
and it was withdrawn on the 22d July. The Parochial
Assessments B:11 was introduced on the Bth April, de-
ferred five times, and withdrawn on the Bth July. The
Public Health (Scotland) Bill was introduced on the 6th
March, read a second time on the 12th April, and, alter
the Committee had been deferred five times, was with-
drawn. The Savings Bank Bill was introduced on the
29th April, the second reading deferred eleven times,
and no further notice taken of it till the Ist of August.
The Stamp Duties Bill was brought in on the 22d March,
and lingered on till the 10th May, when it was put off
for six months. Another Bill of this same kind was
brought in on the 16th May; the Committee was de-
ferred eleven times, and no notice was taken of it till the
Ist of August. The Woods and 'Forests Bill was
brought in on the 22d February, and no step was taken
till the 4th July, when it was withdrawn. Now,
what was the summary of useful measures which
had been passed up to the Ist of August ? The
Australian Colonies Bill, the Brick Duties Bill,
the Charitable Trusts Bill, the Mercantile Marine
Bill, the Metropolitan Interments Bill, and the Parlia-
mentary Voters (Ireland) Bill. There was another Bill
which showed that the Government could pass measures
when they chose to do so—namely, the Ecclesiastical
Commission Bill. He trusted they would consider the
great evils which arose from this mode of conducting the
public business, and believed that if they would arrange
their business in a more efficient manner it would have a
beneficial effect on the plans of independent Members, by
whom fifty-eight Bills had been introduced and eighteen
passed. Gee of the great evils of the present system was
that Members scarcely knew what business was to be
proceeded with on Government nights. The Hon.
Baronet concluded by moving for a return in continua.
tion of the paper headed " Public Bills," up to the pre-
sent time.

The motion having been seconded,
Lord J. RUSSELL said he could not agree with the
Hon. Baronet in the general purport of his remarks, for
it appeared to him that the House of Commons con-
ducted a greater amount of public business than any
other assembly in Europe. The Hon. Baronet said that
Hon. Members were nut aware of the business intended
to be proceeded with on Government nights. Such a
complaint might have been well-founded twenty or thirty
years ago, but he (Lord J. Russell) had altered
the systom which formerly prevaded, by naming in
the votes the first two or three orders which
would take precedence and be likely to occupy
the time of the House; and a further regulation
had been made, that the orders should be taken
as they stood on the paper. The Hon. Baronet had
emitted to notice that a considerable portion of time was
occupied with the estimate:. When it was considered

that in the course of a month the Government had only
about ten nights, Hon. Members must be aware that
some five or *ix weeks were consumed in the considera•

tion of that department of the public service. Consider-
ing this circumstance, and the importance of the sub-
jects brought forward for discussion, and the interest
taken by Hon. Members in many of those subjects, it
was almost surprising that the House should be able to
pass so many important -Bills through their different
stages. The Hon. Baronet complained that many villa
had been brought forward which were not proceeded
with. But there were various reasons for not al ways
pressing Bills forward. The Government considering a
Bill useul for the public interest might feel completely
justified in introducing it; but Honourable Members
might take a different view of it, and the public might
entertain such a strong feelieg against it, that it might
be desirable eventually to withdraw it. He would just
mention the Education Bill, which was very much al-
tered, and subsequently given up. He considered the
Government not to blame either for introducing or aban-
doning a Bill, for it was impossible to foresee the impres-
sion which might exist either in the minds of Hon. Mem-
bers or the public. With respect to the Landlord and
Tenant (Ireland) Bill, that subject had been very much
considered. It was sent to a Committee, consisting
chiefly of Irish Members, and reported with amend-
ments, but when it was sent to Ireland it did not give
satisfaction. Then, with respect to the Lord-Lieute-
nancy Abolition Bill, which was generally approved of
by the House and the country—in that case a question
arose with respect to the appointment of a fourth Secre-
tary of State, respecting which considerable doubt was
entertained. Then with respect to the admission of the
Jews, the time intended to be devoted to that Bill was
occupied by the debate on foreign affairs, and if it had
been sent up to the other House at the beginning of
August, an objection might have been raised to the con-
sideration of a measure of such importance at so late a
period. There were several other Bills with respect to
which similar observations might be made. On the
Court of Chancery, and other Bills, Committees had
been sitting which entertained very different views from
the Goverment, and ho did not think that the time
which these discussions had occupied had been lost, in-
asmuch as discussions of that nature frequently led to
the discovery of modes by which objections might be
obviated.—(Hear, hear.) Some Bills required and
often received long consideration, and he would just
mention the County Courts Bill as an instance. In
the year 1823 or 1824, Earl Spencer introduced a
Bill of that description, which was approved of by
everybody, but was not carried. It was re-introduced
by various Governments and net carried until 1846
after about 24 years' discussion. Perhaps if the Hon.
Baronet was at the head of the Ministry he might be
able to devise proper measures, and might succeed in
rendering all the details acceptable to Parliament. With
respect to the Woods and Forests Bill, the House might
recollect that after that Bill was introduced a change
took place in the office of the Woods and Forests which
rendered it desirable that extensive alterations should be
made in the Bill, Being desirous that full time should
be given to his Noble Friend who was appointed to the
office of Chief Commissioner to consider the alterations
proposed, he had thought it better that the Bill should
be withdrawn. He should not go further into the va-
rious questions raised by the Hon. Baronet. There had
been several very important Bills introduced and carried
in the course of the session, on every one of which great
pains had been bestowed. The Australian Colonies Bill
had taken up a great portion of the time of the House;
but no one would deny that in the course of the discus-
sion various views had been developed by the Right
Hon. Gentleman the Member for Oxford, and other
Hon. Members, which were well worthy the attention of
the House. Another measure of great importance—the
Metropolitan Interments Act—took up a considerable
share of their time.
BRlGHT—Onlyonenigh night.
SirM r .
B.
H A L
was discussed chiefly in morning
sittings.

Lord J. RUSSELL said that the impression left on
his mind was, that it had been discussed at very great
length.—(A laugh.) lie thought that local prejudices
bad had a great effect in obstructing the progress of that
Bill, which, in his opinion, was a very useful and ne-
cessary measure of reform.--(Elear,hear.) No doubt
one obstacle to speedy legislaiion now-a-days was the
increased number of Members desirous of discussing
measures. More attention w as bestowed Low on every
measure brought forward than was formerly the case,
and consequently a greater portion of tiros Was consumed
in legislation. In furrner days the debates were gene-
rally limited to four or five speakers, regarded as leading
Members; and on a great number of Bills passed in former
days no traces of a debate existed. But now-a days that
was not the case, and the result was, mole time was con-
sumed in considering and discussing political measures.
However, he thought there was every reacon to be sa-
tisfied with the close attention which the 'louse had be-
wowed on public affairs during the present session. The
attention which had been given to the various subjects
brought before thew, more partLularly to the Metropo-
litan Interments Bill and to the Australian Colonies ,
Bill, confirmed the belief thud there W 43 no public

------
'WS, WBich
aS6eMbly, either of the present or fottner tc1,00030300
got, through Si, much I-mito ss as the 'louse I y
of this reentry.—(ii .r, bear.) h rebabilA
Air. BRIG/ IT seed he did 11,4 dill 1,-.td,l'wolke,.
(2ioo(!_inAgletuni,e,eri:sf
sthxatrnollootubsse had been harder viaboureti
pick, cl our of env perish in El lolgalnandu.llll2eato"..°l:"eb(S:
the Government sheeted t,:ke it into theit• con*eug,..oo
whether a better mode of conduc ins
could not be adopted. It appeared to bitodusl osed of
it not all the &tans of measures might be l Peifaes of
by sections of the House, and that only the pp: ddr
a measure should be reserved for the discassio zed 0
cision of the whole House. Ho bad always Presoaked
Government the necessity of considering the
et,eee, 6
and Tenant Bill as a measure of the first inlets:l.7a se
d
conference had been sitting in Dublin on this s.uleleeciid not
had been attended by men of all parties. Thougil,Dot co
agree with all that had been said and done at op 0
public .
abs
0,10,01
ference, he could not deny thst it threatened le_tuisa sr
agitation much more formidable than any Waffle elokle
isted of late years in Ireland. He hoped ' erl tbil
ware . , be
Lord would be prepared to. subunit a dimple fess
subject next session of a character sofe 006
would be justified in carrying it through 1"-, ertbe
Reference had hcen made to the Cerstnitte.e roe
House. He wished to make a remark with °fed
to what had been said of the committee
(rood
salaries. A Noble and Learned Lord ba, f eral
in another piece that the Committee censisteare _Dos!
ignorant nen."—(A laugh.) Ile doubted ivbe ti_cctli mrd,
quite Perliumentiry for ally Noble and Leal:rd ord
to say that a Committee of that Howe was %ea Yr
" very ignoraet nieu." That Noble and Lear pea bill
complained that the Committee had 130 t7t3f ithe V
on the subject office and salary e iee him
Chancellor. If tithe Committee did not 0001 boo
(1. e., the Noble and Learned Lord) it was neeeer od
the Noble and Learned Lord had not 1161‘ecivieee 1136
over again to be examined.—(Laugher.) that ae(tlle
•
proposal was submitted to the Committee t',' the (Pi;
Noble and Learned Lord) should be exatniseuo' ed Wu/
versal opinion was that he (the Noble and Leafogisbtet;
weight
dhnt otegitihveeraniyn intfhoormiaitoionnseliknerlyinto itlbseveeotuo?,t.reiles;(l.
laugh.) The Committee needed not to regard tr7ed DI
brought against them by the Noble and Les „or I
std
as anythine very ternaidable.—(flear.) Inioele111„
he had had a passage at arms with. the ,;1 oPillil
learned individual in question, and the geellfied ia,„111,0
was, that he (Mr. Bright) had not Wee "...licit Pca
contest. The Noble and Learned Lord we'„,ighto,,,
formidable
itiodabbele now. Admired and honoured 11.ei;uloor-
en formeprilyti,edbu.l7Awlhaneawhaos wourseewthigahntriouybes ogftihnil:;
His race of glory run, his race of shame.f be 00
And better for his reputation would it be 1
0
say,— Ow etre
his
u Would that andwere tongue pen
biereaa
(Hear, hear.)
tthhoeullghotn.thMeember for Manchester . teefere of 1110
and the of tbsS '.
Mr. A. STAFFORD did not rise to le ;et be
wrath.—(A laugh.) He wished mere!), to Sit el oPgs
complaint made by the Ilea'l3Bs Ord e a
site as to the mode of conducting business
e-d.b geo-010,
the House was in some degree to be eft° f them ;It'
heard with astonishment the suggest'ee si°o e°96.detr
Member to refer details of measures to 'l7 ~,. St, -. 0
tion of sections of the House, because 11" 1-etVeri:jsi
culty always had been to decide as t° was 111° Dor
tails, and what were not. For instance, ^ . gill, . v
qualification in the Irish Re • tration . tratit "d
gtS roe
.free
was the question of compulsory „ fie dept
a matter ot detail or of princiPle i tee Isli-esd
with what the lion. Member had said as 1° roteeeod
and tenant question. He _thought the Gcleehjeet'' et'
nut attempted vigorously to legislate on that° 06 0
that they would be met by the same diffi°ll, era.
sion which they pretended had obstructed."'" i the I
; itf ° Oil"'
of the measure in this. (Hear.) If a 1330:P-iit to tfb° eat
that
of Ireland had been oPPA°SB-lig it
~elo'
that might have been a reason for withurtiwnich `13,460"
the question had not even been debated, 113t"reeP-00
qhtided.iusest i
desireoSriV ,h he ne thattwh ae s Hon.Gaonvx ei 1 tor Iruems me
to
oet r ,hfsoeharhri Nu 11 e
lei
whetl Igeissynsuierbi
11;e
ceo i
pc.. jeer
;ipitbi
:11
dlHieooannro.esuttrlember bad to prOpound on tu'e- ton, she
of buying
Honourable
earkMe cheapest an i tbel Pe "It
a selltee ' fie . h
Why did he app.): A,,at i- „el.
theinet.mberwas an advocate selling
. , ae
reference
produce of land, and yet refuse to 6,"Wbf wale
no to the land itself ?—(Hear, he° i bO/5 ger?
aarn,dh,eaanrd. )
by Thehis
efittheofliatnadsedweiprasprtiheetocrasticoofirnlarkealr:clAaisst°oodoc,:::oo::,
-i— (IHreel
bent
publieolo be, sto
Hon.speeches
cited a hope among the tenants of Reload o'li,es o'bject
do something for them. But after the Pr, the tjtoe ere
Hon. Member to the farmers of Enelol4°9s' littleLeie`
of the game laws, the tenants of Ireland h 0, reolegeo
pest from the Hon. Member in the shsPe di to 11.%tice;
grievances. It was at all times much More e"iato 4
„n" ' go 0:
ameliorating measures than to carry more
e 07,010
M aeinober ha. -tio p.,010
II the Hon. Member excited hopes aut°,l)grfiereeli,too,el
Ireland, and led them to believe that la' -be 0,, 000'-
transfer the fee simple of the lend to ihelllo soice oste
himselfopen to the charge of exciting hnPetiteli et°•still,e;
never be realised. Nothing was awre: eofn,l -
ima), capital from Ireland than the draw'ari Oa' bat
i re Seas to
lion between the owners of propertYhjlooll.
present the transition state foretold bY iie tetra fits° u- I
for the West Riding still existed, and i. i,iootromi
be pitted against their landlords, the di6ce.e'se-ed• Aba. rill
on that state would be considerably itlertweeluollio
because he saw that a formidable agitsti?",ooole.eitir
upon this question that he deplored the
thin
.
out
ticed the question in a Speech from tseir ere e• 0;
_1 having carried their intentions into Bate plots'
_, Ar. BRIGHT explained. With refer, 06 ,21. Pi
duet on the game laws a vast majoriti :go e" 01
were opposed to him. With corn at 4C)j. senile
landlords would be brought to their „ 00
the question would be asg well settled oiiell
hence as now. o OP
After a remark from Sir 11. WILL -.6
was not heard, •
10°
Sir B. HALL withdrew his motion.
e
CEYLON. • 'cleaceOlf
I, eve aiee 0
Mr. HUME rose to move that the d A nttereA
before the Ceylon Committee be Pril,:sreil 11;ferr"
Lord at the head of the Government eves barrel;
an amendment in his motion that the ovib" 0 oth,e;oo_,"ty
to the Secretary of the Colonies, and to ' tesseore•d Iva
bs of her Majesty's Government. 110,cl000ideo coy ! ,
amendment surprised him, because,, Pe ingtoll',o Prr4'
_Ministers equally culpable with Lord ...- ors After the
lAA,
the House had to
cities corn • mated in Ceylon be thougullied;°(oo7.o°
:Torrington
. and Lord Grey ought to bet'" Iso ' "be
The militar • had to " a 0 i
e been let loose in „lite, tbo.ntee
had been shot without even the rules r'noo" lb'? I ili AW be
Hmartial being observed. It was iliir •eleter'; he' lele
ouree could be satisfied ritebout 611 1,0 OZOh. 0.,...a;
whole question. Pre - • w thathe 11:a pew te'
,luninary
of !al' 0, Of'
evidence taken by the Committee a° semberhe 00 et'
to be printed and distributed arner'g on 00 tee- 011,,d0
they might be able
As for un- eee,
the Ministers they would re,
. aae•
dinary talent to defend them in this c ,
move that the evidence be printed. If;
beard f,,0
The question having been put, ri. etlf ll3' a'
to 00
Mr. HAWES (who was very ite,P„lhietbe ;110000'
posed the motion of his Hon. FriePe- to lelb/COO:
Friend's First of all, he wishe' isee 700',,i be,
attention to what had takenaPetb,ll.ooo,7, tbs'
mittee. It had reported in one Ole', ott`",teci neace'
mittee was of opinionthat °roil' dire" ele." d 0
the $ be toe oi f
Majesty's Government ought to _to+ ;Lteet, lee
matter. With regard to the riuti" sita' Oa 1/0
that subject had been-
.p ,_ 00 .do 01 I
mooted in to', Os' ' sb° 00,
motion made, and the question poloittee Tod'
the evidence taken before the C°7.,e- s I°. 111 citt4' re'
printed. The ayes had been he 11" e 3 106 Iti
2, t pe 2.,.A, bt
motion " which the Committee enterta.,,,,intee plesai
wholeo of the evidence was not to be V;ijeveleb."; - le,
elution to the effect that part of the ebe PO ift,7014"
left out, and thst a separation mightve Cetltiell-etely:l
_ee.different portions of the evidence. , t sap oh -the irfd
d ided that be could not accept to that, ell ej
evidence. The result of all west reipittligje "0
.of the evidence should not u" cue 101,1
it was indefeasible to eeParate erlel'ce l'
01 g eilietr
another; and that no further
Ouse, A odd 1
advisable to be re o t d t the
of e._ pre o wireve jottild De,
theevidence taken WaS of an f Pri„ Proji,,,e
chartictsr, consisting in some resPee.e it aar-goeej bpi
to the Committee, and it would be It cideare, t1;0';o0,vo
called-for that the whole of the e—re 01 ol' -
printed and circulated before the writ° Tiler bick,(oo
~.,,,t r. .„.0 fi_ao; di
received any
intimation on that! '----teeideee- rile, ~
one line of any other part of ° et wish $l7O ollirj
the
ment would have the slightest ficjeali 0;1'00
e public. After
that private aod on otev #
e 6 reed 1 dot d
bad been laid
before the Committe r, to oe 4 .
Lion on
the question of publicat Nabatich Of arg
the mind of the Committee. It on "06 etiaoil AO
such grounds alone,the Govereme tr° Dr?'
that d be oekl i
the •
motion of the HOB. MCDabert 1/13 oti 1 00' ir
3 0 ,;01,41
House would never lend itself to be °,11301‘ 1 Adeee ee;
did he ' on" •r.
of trust or of confidence; nor „el C rite jol
sent to the publication of a private 13" f the *Il 00 0 eif
respondence without the knowledga °
to au 11 oicerior
Hon. Member concluded by I.l,°ving'eeideleee fiee,"
upon Mr. Hume's motion, •• Tbat the d to t'''' i be.
hire the Ceylon Committee be re err
e of
• 'l,OO.
of State for the Colonies, and the w -000 ~
jesty's Government." net ti, , ba, et
be ev°9 es- it ille
Mr. NEWDEGATE said wore oo ,
that Committee; but he had beer:3sloo bee!gible.nifteo
Member was understood) that therit wes PeoFri evil! y
deuce on the table of the House- matter Id ebetl,e
might be a case in which there wf.99ff ig WO° 0,0 Om°
dictory nature in the evidence; if e-w' aere'e!gaeliefol rii
to inquire into it. He wished toe nere'sv 01)30000(Po
a Committee had auy right to llitteee°,jetei ;010
they had taken. Was it that Cete,e of led, by 1143
formed the Government of the sTeaileite I‘coehey Po,
it sanctioue e such very grave proee_ of the
enter I'ooo
place in total ignorance r f the
of the „idooeitor,Aige
Government had been aware nf t f thst COO e,
sanctioned what every rneeeberaen_esserYo, co.. free
meuted. Was that Committee.
.trri It
_vi test_ biloo,
it to sit for two sessions for notbl.4 part ("006tiollto
was an important intorferenCe 01,,,,,re Gofe,% tbilj iti,id
with the colonial government. ;o!cefirres_i,, tb:00,0
be held responsible for w bat hol uwould 0, . oryAf To
But was it not extraordinery, he
seed' tiv° 'reecijo:4ol
such a state of things as there et,xtZre olio vilizelere
have been allowed to dePse „it of °elf theogh I 11)8
applied? The recent Goverr_s ope
.iiitit..o loreogo
was sorry to observe, b© ~......w7fleate)eoee '', esceff
pages in our Colonial history. k
the e" 'onieeb tlierd af
might be some reason frottot
~, Goer_ noce 4.00 o
House, the inference was th t hale
take Pop tif;'preotr.;
ignorantly sanctioning WhO itoterOloot 11,0,(0°
that it was cognizant e f those 'if; oev
itie ,
_O, 0;
did ;he kl (bet 0 °Ptiliege
them. He would ask, was •j-, P 0 ,
them or not ? Ail they knew., eeeole he 001 tfr
tion of that colony (altheugh • 1 d i° 1 9 this
continuo _.ne
was now going out) had esetg" : • i
the
and all they had now was