The Sun.
London, England, 1868-11-17 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, TUESDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 17, 1868.

tor his political views to the speech he lately de.
livered to the electors of Richmond. The hon. gentleman
then promised to support every measure for the improve-
ment
of those elements of the civil law which needed
improvement, and also improvements in the army and navy
—in short, to all improvements which he understood to be
improvements he would give his honest and earnest
support. It bad been said that he had virtually through
his conduct on the Irish Church gone over to the
Conservatives. How had it happened, then, that he
had just been rejected by Oxford! As to the Ballot,
which by some seemed to be regarded as a political
Shibboleth by which Liberalism had to be tested, he
voted with Mr. Gladstone and Mr. Mill in opposing its
,ntroduction. His reasons were too high a respect for the
working classes themselves, that as votes were openly
riven in the House of Commons in uniformity with the
;entiment that public power ought to be exercised under
I sense of public responsibility, any elector who has the
;ame power of government as the members of the Legis-
aturo should vote openly as they do. Ninety-nine out of
svery hundred men would say how they voted. The Ballot
.vas not consistent with absolute secrecy in voting. After
.leetion by ballot the election could not be reviewed.
At Tamworth the electors heard Sir ROBERT and Mr.
TOIIN PEEL, and Sir HENRY 131.7 LIVER, The latter, after
:ailing upon the electors who had invited him to stand for
lie borough to give him their supportat the poll, said that
ae was not going to make any new professions of political
'aith. When formerly in Parliament he had given a
:onscientious support to Liberal measures, and, though his
sutward appearance might have changed since that time,
iis political sentiments bad remained unaltered. Expe-
ience bad but increased the strength of those opinions,
'or the more he had seen of despotism in various parts of
;he world, the more he had been:shocked by its withering
nfluenee ; and the more he had witnessed the extension of
popular rights the more he had found that confidence
reposed in the great bulk of the people was not misplaced.
Mr. VILLIERS returned thanks to the electors of Wolver-
laropton for his unopposed return. He said it was a
treat crisis, in which the interests of the people were
nvolved. He said this most distinctly, after
rery much consideration, and after a review of what
iad happened during a political career extending
)ver many years. He never in his life had known
s moment more important to the interests of the people
;ban that in which they were then living. They
lad got the franchise. It had been extended to them at
ast, and he believed they were entitled to it. He never
mew the people ask for that which did not conduce to
he interests of the empire. The people had 'got the power
low, and they were not going to be such fools as not to
Ise it. They must be fools indeed who thought the
nople would not use it. The Tories might not
save been wise in giving it to the people, but
he people had got it, and he for one said " Go on."
was gratifying to see the interest which the working
:lasses took in the conduct of the different constituencies.
['hey had for their leader a singularly eminent
nan—a man in whom they believed, for he was

DIREC7 ORS AND PR03107 ERS
PARLIAM ENT .

( From the Anglo-American Times.)
Not professing to partisanship as regards Ame-
rican politics, we cannot be supposed to be influ-
enced by politics ac regards England, to which, in
truth, we devote little attention. But we earnestly
desire, for the honour of the father and model of
all Legislative Assemblies, that the people may
not return to Parliament one man whose name has
been sullied in connection with the late poisonous

crop of swindles, from the deadly night shade of
which the nation does now, and will for many a long

year, suffer. Can English people rejoice that he
whom they selected to represent a great metropoli-
tan constituency should be the one at whom the

magistrate of a Brussels Police Court launched his
heaviest censure, confirme 1 and endorsed by a

Bench of Belgian Judges ? Can they like their
eccentricities in money matters to be the subject of
scoffs and sneers in a Criminal Court of the very

city they had spent half a million to drain and
beautify ; while the name of another member of
Parliament was freely used, whose peculiar style of

financing has rained thousands, thong' it has raised
him from obscurity to affluence? Sir M. PEro has

happily retired. Mr. ALBERT GRANT does not aspire
to a re-election ; Mr. RICHARD S ruAra LANE Will
not get one, indeed he would be better employed
in explaining the affairs of the Merchants' Com-
pany. Since that extraordinary scene in the Lord
Mayor's court, nothing more has been heard
by the public as to those damaging charges so
suspiciously hushed. Directors who feel things
must be explained in connection with the queer
games some short time ago played, would, if they
took our advice, levant at once, and seek a
more genial clime and a more grateful obscurity

than the harsh winter and disagreeable notoriety.
which most certainly await them here. Perhaps
never before did men gain more at greater cost to
others, and less cost to themselves; still thousands
upon thousands of families cannot be plungo,l into
poverty by nefarious transactions without a day
of reckoning at last arriving ; and that day has

now come. Last Monday Mr. PHILIP VANDERBYL,
M.P. (the Daily Telegraph spells his name VAN-
DERVILLE) was examined in the Rolls Court on a
petition for winding up the Lundy Granite Com-
pany. This gentleman is a partner in a re-
spectable city firm, which in 1865 formed
one of the three constituting the London
Merchants Company, on the breaking down of
which, Messrs. LANE, lIANKEY, Lllll Co. founded
the Merchants' Company, that precious concern
about which we lately heard somethicg in the Lord
Mayor's Court. We must not be supposed for a
moment to confound the two, for nothlng could
have been more fair and honourable than the action
of the London Merchants' direction, as luckily tor
the shareholders who had early taken fright, at least
one of the firms was of high honour and standing. Mr.
VANDERBYL'S evidence is worth glancing at, though
not cross-examined, as this will yet be treasure to the
historian ; for some gentlemen, while rapidly making
fortunes over their lunch in the back parlours of
their handsomely furnished offices whereon the
magic word Limited was written, were not aware
that they were also making a chapter of English
history so discreditable as to redden the face
centuries hence of their descendants. One of their
pleasing delusions is founded on the old saying of
"there being no use in crying over spilt milk," that
the shareholders in general will accept their
ruin without further inquiry when they know
that all is irretrievably lost now they are

3onest, and they knew he was able. Mr. Glad-
(tone had adopted the colours of the people.
'le had nailed them to the mast, and he would
lever strike his colours. He (Mr. Villers) knew
)Sr. Gladstone was acting with Mr. Bright, whom
ie thought they could trust. The people knew
,hat they were right in trusting Mr. Gladstone—they
mew they were right in trusting such colleagues as Mr.
aright. They knew what Mr. Gladstone had promised—
,bat he would reduce taxation, that he would extend edu-
ation to all classes, and that he would establish religious
,quality in Ireland ; while he did nothing—and this was
nest prominent in all his speeches—that could in any
vay affect the Protestant faith.

rapidly realizing the fact of the reverse being the
case, as the shareholders hitherto were restrained
by the deception the Directors fostered, that any I
row would only finish off the remnant ; but on the
knowledge that even the remnant is gone, they
turn savagely to ask—where? Mr. VANDERBYL
gives an idea how a good deal of money belonging
to the shareholders of the National Bank went, of
which he was a Director. He was also a Director
of the Bank of Hindostan, China, and Japan, of
which at the time of stoppage the National Bank
were creditors for over a million. He believed that
some of the Directors were Directors of the Inter-
national Company, and of JOSEPH SUCHE and Co.
(Limited) ; the latter were on intimate relations
with some of the Directors of the National Bank.
He had everywhere heard it rumoured that the
Directors of the National Bank had received large
sums for the promotion of companies. Sir JOSEPH
M'KENNA, the managing Director, had he had
heard, made a hundred thousand pounds, of which
£40,000 was from the Peruvian It tilway Com-
pany,:now being wound up. He believed that
M'KENNA had the control of the allotment
of the Peruvian Company, that the market
was rigged, and that the Stock Exchange justly
animadverted on the case. The Bank was like-
wise connected with the promotion of the National
Steam Navigation and M'KENNA, with
ASiter.HAßvELEwiCs:malpsannym.p.,
and Mr. HEN-
SHAW, were promoters of (that precious concern)
the Marseilles Land Company. They were also
connected with the promotion of the International
Company(a most disastrous thing.)
another of the directors are NCio,nKtEraNcNtA
and
con-
nected with the promotion of CHARLES LAFITTE
and Co. The National Bank, he had heard, found
director,
up the shares ; but, though a monels: forecei kivitnagfng four or five hundred per annum
from tho Bank, he could not say. We may here
explain that an attempt was made not long before
whichrat smashed up these swindles
rated banking firm of LAFITTE into
tthoefnfirnuailthpeanniecleb
an English Joint Company (Limited), and a
disastrous
s failure
termedtock
the Ottoman Financial
Association was to be incorporated, so that the in-
tricacies might never be followed out between the
directors with the money and the shareholders. How-
ever, the scheme to which the National Bank lent
themselves failed, and any one may now le trn, on
inquiry, at least what the value is of the Ottoman
Financial Association shares. Mr. POWER, the
Secretary of the National Bank, had 930 shares in
the Peruvian Railway Company, Mr. VANDERBYL
believed, but he did not think any money was ad-
vanced by the bank to take up shares of that com-
pany. The shareholders of the National Bank had
raised a great outcry on the conduct of the direc-
tors with regard to these companies, and Mr. VAN-
DERBYL stated that the managing director received
for his work a salary of £4,200 per annum. We
have no desire to reflect on the evidence given by
this member of the late Parliament regarding his
connection with the Lundy Granite Company, nor
do we know what the state of that company is ; but
it cannot wholly be passed unnoticed. Mr. VAN-
DERBYLT signed the memorandum of association,
and assisted in its promotion at the request of
M'KENNA. He denied, however, any kuowledge
of operations to raise the price of the shares ; he
never tried to work them up to a premium, nor
contemplated such a thing, nor had he heard
of a broker applying for a large number.
One of those awkward facts in a court of
law, a forgotten letter, was here produced, and if
the report in the Telegraph is to be believed, Mr.
VANDERBYL then swung suddenly round. He had
no recollection of it, but he had no doubt he did
try to work the shares up to a premium ; he took
everything for granted M'KENtia told him, and
very probably wrote the letter at his dictation. He
did not call working shares up to 3 orl premium, with-
out bona fide purchases, rigging the market, and he
thought it very likely that it was Mr. •Fox,
broker to the National Bank, or his London corre-
spondent, who applied for 5,000 shares. He could
not tell, but it was very possible Mr. Fox got £5OO
from the company for that transaction, and when
shown an entry in the pass-book of the National,
"Fox £500," he believed that to be the payment in
question. We merely find this recorded in the
columns of the Telegraph, aul we know nothing of
the Lundy Granite Company ; but the evidence
given by this director of the National Bank is too
remarkable to be passed wholly without notice.
In the first place, the National Bank is among
the greatest of banking institutions ; in the
next place, these companies with which a few of its
Directors were associated were among the most
disastrous failures in London. Some of them were
even worse than mere failures. In this lies the de-
struction of all confidence, for we have in this a
great banking institution and leaders among the
mercantile community connected with such affairs—

that very connection being the decoy-duck to the
outside public who are ruined in masses while the
promoters thrive.
In another place another examination was being
conducted, as remarkable in its way, to which here
we have only space briefly to allude. The Bank
of Bombay held in that Presidency something of the
position the Bank of England holds in London. So
intimate was the connection of Government with
it that the shareholders believed it to be responsible
that the paid-up capital should be refunded to them in
the event of the bank's failure. Some officers of the
Government were Directors ex officio, yet this bank,
notwithstanding the exertions of the Government
to keep it afloat, smashed after the bursting of the
great Bombay Bubble. That the new-fangled finan-
cial and reclamation schemes should fail would sur-
prise no one, for the A nglo-Saxon race have a singular
aptitude for turning an unexpected tide of prosperity
into inflation and consequent collapse. But that this
old Government Bank, weighty with a heavy ori-
ginal capital, as well as the accumulation of
years of sound business, should fly off among
such kites, petrified alike the peop%c of Bombay
and England, who naturally were curious to barn
the cause. Now, the telling of this story, though
not a matter on which lloychund Premchund and
the like will break their hearts, is like wringing the
life-blood out of some of those who benefited by it,
or were connected with it. A member of the
Madras Civil Service was thus examined, and con-
veniently forgot many circumstances, as did the
member of Parliament until an awkward letter was
produced, which took all the wind out of his sails,
and he was like a ship caught aback. We repeat
our earnest hope that the people will not return
any man to Parliament connected with these ques-
tionable transactions, which, however they may re-
concile to their own conscience, cannot but be inja-
• rious to a Legislature, that has already suffered
enough from such connection.

THE,PARTIES OF THE FUTURE 1N THE

UNITED S7AIES.

Notwithstanding that the fight for power and for
the spoils was so earnest in the United States neither
party represented well defined and fixed principles,
although each did represent a different policy. Upon
what.principle is the Republican party founded, or, its
I)e►nocratic rival? The former, in the African eman

cipation has gained the object for which it strove;
the latter, in opposing negro suffrage, has swung
round against the very platform upon which it was
built up. Setting aside the Congressional policy of
Reconstruction as decided—for what other than
office, is the strife of parties ? There are momentous
questions to be settled, such as Protection versus
Free Trade, Greenback Redemption and Taxa-

• The coming history of the United States will be
of an interest little less exciting than that just
passed, for we must shortly see the dissolution and
the re-formation of the two great parties which have
for so many years ruled in the United States.—
Anglo-American Times.

tion of Interest versus a liberal and honourable
interpretation of the contract, Civil Service Re-
form, versus the scramble for office as at present ;
yet there is not one upon which the parties are
squarely divided. In England it is asserted that the
Republicans advocate Liberalism as opposed to the
Democrats who advocate Conservatism, and as
a general rule the Liberal papers throw themselves
strongly into the Republican ranks, while such as the
Standard advocate the Democratic cause little less
violently than Toryism in England. But although
the American parties may, and perhaps must, even-
tually assume some such form as that given to them
in England, as yet, they have not ; and we, who
desire to write nothing but the unvarnished truth,
free from party bias, see no reason why what is not,
should, without challenge, be assserted as true.
Viewing broadly the whole position, we see a Pre-
sident elected, who is, of all Americans, the least
"pronounced" in his political opinions. If there
be a man in the Republic who is not a politician
that man is GRANT, and, as such he is in striking
contrast with his predecessors for many years. Do
the Re, blicans advocate an honest payment of the
Debt ? if so, how is it they elected to Congress
BUTLER, who declared most strongly for, and is the
leader of, Greenback Redemption? THADDEUS STE-
VENS, had he been alive, would certainly have been
re-elected, when the chief advocates against the
bondholders would have been found in those whose
influence weighci most in the Republican ranks.
The election of BUTLER 15 to significant a fact to
be overlooked in Europe, certainly at least by us,
whose business it is t) note all the signs of the
times ; and with this electioa before us it cannot be
said that the parties are squarely divided, the one
for and the other against ropuliation. The Ame-
rican Conservatives are thought-, oa this side the
Atlantic, to be the advocates of Free Trade ; and,
singularly enough, considering that Conservatives
elsewhere are its opponents. The head of the
Free Trade movement, Senator GRDIES, is, however,
a Republican, and when writing last year in lowa to
the Burlington Hawkeye, he thus expressed himself
—" So far as I know, the Republican party has never
taken any position on the subject of a tariff,
and so far as I believe four-fifths of the members of
that party in this State are in fall accord with Mr.
WILSON, Mr. ALLISON, Mr. KASSON, Governor

KIRKWOOD, and myself, and with a majority
of the members of Congress from the North-
Western States, on the subject of an increase
of the present tariff." Tate Tribune " main-
tains the right of every Republican to be a
Protectionist or Free-Trader as he shall see fit ; no
man is less a Republican for any opinion he may
cherish on questions of p3litical economy ; let each
Republican and each Democrat be a Protectionist
orFree-Trader, for license or prohibition, as his own
judgment shall dictate." As regards the third sub-
ject, the Reform of the Civil Service, there is not
an American of common patriotism who does not
pronounce strongly for it wholly independent of
politics, unless he be professionally a politician,
with his bread and butter at stake. The truth is
that, putting aside Negro Suffrage an Reconstruc-
tion as settled, neither party rests on a broad, well-
defined base, and the only other cry which could be

got up by the " outs" was that the " ins" were ex-
travagant, fleeced the people, and gobbled up all
the loaves and fishes. On the question of Re3on-

struction the nation divided almost evenly, that
is, supposing every one throughout the South had
been quite freeto vote, the blacks not frightened from
the polls, nor any of the whites disfranchised. When
we get the full returns, we will find that although
GRANT carried 25 out of the 34 States permitted
to send electors, his nnjority remaining, if the
voters in the United States had all paired off, would

not have been large. The material then for two
good parties exists, the questions also exist ; what
is required is a separation on broad principles to be
applied to those questions as well as to certain others
foreshadowed by Mr. SEYMOUR, which will assuredly
rise into importance, and in some measure assimi-
late parties in America to those of the United
Kingdom. He grounded his remarks on the undue
influence given to the large centres of population at
the expense of the agricultural districts, wherein we
see the germs of the fight between the manufac-
turers and the agriculturists, in which the interests
of the one will be mainly backed in the Western and
of the other in the Eastern States. England must
not mistake the position each will assume on one
important point, for in America it will be the re-
verse of what occurred during the struggle in Eng-
land; the agriculturists here were the Protection-
ists, the manufacturers being the Free-Traders, the
one deriving their power from the rural districts,
the other from the cities—whereas, the reverse will
be the case in America. The interests of the East
and West will clash on other questions besides the
unequal distribution of the national currency, but
on none so forcibly as on the tariff. At this moment
no man can predict how the parties will divide, and
we believe, although the New England States and
the Western States were unanimous in their elec-
tion of the Republican ticket, yet the interests of
the Atlantic States will ba found to support the one
party, while the influence of the great prairie States
and the agricultural South will back the other party.
There can be no compromise on this subject in the
parties of the future, as heretofore; split they must,
be they Democrat or be they Republican ; and when
the new machinery begins to work, the new ques-
tions will commence fermenting, and Congress will
quickly begin to change. Suppose, for instance,
that the Hon. DAVID WELLS is selected by GRANT
as Secretary of the Treasury, an advocate of Free
Trade (for it. cannot be denied that Mr. WELLS is
now in his heart a Free-Trader), will hold the post

in which he can make such an influence most felt. i THE STATUS OF EDITORS IN ENGLAND.
Immediately the Protectionists would take fright,
and on such questions they permit no compro-
mise, no discussion. A split would, we believe,
instantly take place, and Republicans and De-
mocrats would range side by side. Indeed, now
that the great questions which held together the
Republican party, and the other, are decided by the
late elections, both it and its opponent are away
from their anchorage and adrift. They must
" let go" other anchors on ground with room to
swing, where they can take deeper and firmer hold.
The very essence of a free government is a constitu-
tional opposition, and no party ought ever to be
permitted by the people to gain an overwhelming
power, for they then degenerate into a despotism,
such for instance as did the Whig families of Eng-
land, who long exercised a corrupt control over
Great Britain under the pretence of being Liberty's
guardian.

(From the Anglo-American 2 Imes.)

One indication of the Americanization in pro-
gress in England is the number of newspaper men
proposed as candidates for the new Parliament.
The status of an editor is, and always has been,
higher in America than on this side the Atlantic.
Indeed, the power of such organs as the Times, the
Daily News, the telegraph, the Standard, and Star
is singularly out of keeping with the standing of
those who direct them. Doubtless, in England, the
anonymous system differs from that in vogue in
America, as here the journal is everything, the per-
sons who conduct it, nothing; while in America
the conductors insist on making themselves known,
and half merging the journal in themselves. Few
Englishmen cm tell who the editor is of the paper they
constantly read, and they never heard the names or
saw the persons of those whose articles have im-
pressed them most. Yet these very men, if they
know anything at all of America, associate the
Tribune with Horace Greeley, the Times with Ray-
mond, the Herald with the B.mnetts. If asked
who the leading men in the United States were,
these would be among the first names suggested.
Thus the editors of the leading journals are given a
place IN ith the statesmen, the great lawyers, and
the soldiers of the Union. Indeed a connection
with the press is not only a free passport every-
where, but a good means of rising into political
imp )rtance and attaining to some of the high offices of
State. In this respect the colonies deal more libe-
rally with editors than England does. Often the
best means of attaining to eminence is through the
press; perhaps for the same reason that the jour-
nalists of America are such .prominent nersons, the
anonymous character not being there main-
tained. It is evident, however, that something
of a change is taking place in England, for
we find the following gentlemen brought forward
as candidates for Parliament. Mr. Walter of the
Times is standing for Berkshire ; Mr. Russell for
Chelsea ; Mr. Baines, Leeds Mercury, for Leeds;
Mr. Cowen, Newcastle Chronicle, for Newcastle ;
Dr. Sebastian Evans, Birmingham Gazette, for
Birmingham ; and Sir John Gray, Freeman's Jon; -
nal, for Kilkenny. Sir Henry Hoare, Mr. Charles
Reed, Mr. Labouchere, and Mr. Samuel Morley,
all connected with the Daily News, stand in the
Liberal interest ; and Mr. Clayden seeks to be re-
urned for Nottingham.

Commodore Vanderbilt has been unfortunate in
the accidents which have recently occurred on the
roads he controls, more especially on the New York
Central. The public are getting seriously annoyed
at these catastrophes, some the result of gross
carelessness and inattention to the condition of the
way, while millions are expended in bribery and on 3
vile system of gambling. On the Hudson River
Road, lately, an accident occurred a few miles be-
low Greenbush, by which two passengers were
killed, and forty more or less injured. This Was
the result of a broken rail, and two serious acci-
dents followed on the New York Central from
somewhat similar causes. The list of losses on
the water have been heavy, though no lives were
sacrificed. The ocean steamer Del Norte, while on
a voyage from Sitka to Victoria, was wrecked on
October 1; the steamer Gen. Q,citinan, from Vicks-
burg for New Orleans, sank with 1,700 bales of
cotton and 4,500 sacks of corn ; the bark L. IL
Bissell, of Detroit, was burned with its $50,000
cargo ; and the steamer Lily has been sunk on the
upper Missouri.
John Quincy Adams, since his return to Massa-
chusetts, has spoken earnestly in favour of the
South, and promises never to stop nor relax the
heartiest and most strenuous efforts to remove such
"blessings" as Reconstruction from the necks of the
fellow-citizens, who, he says, want no more contest,
no more ill blood ; they want merely to shake
hands, saying, " We fought, and now the fight i 3
done, let us be friends." Lc That is the feeling of the
mass of the whole people I met at the South. I
saw no unkindness, no sort of feeling indicating
unkindness towarda any of the people at the North."
The criminal returns for Massachusetts in 1868,
dated Oct. 1, show a total commitment for crimes
and offences of 13,526, though the number of per-
sons comrnittted is little over 10,000, many being
recommitments. The returns were from Charleston
prison, the State workhouse at Bridgewater, the
Boston House of Industry, the fifteen county
houses of correction, and the nineteen county jails,
9,942 commitments were of males, and 3,584 °
females; the corresponding figures for 1867 were
8,996 males and 3,284 females ; showing that the
increase of crime has been chiefly among men. The
whole increase of commitments has been 1,20 P
the increase in drunkenness and common drunkard°
alone being 1,136 ; so that the increase in genera
crimes apart from drunkenness has been but 110,
or about 14 per cent.' only. The three higher
crimes show the following relative figures :---Mur-
der, 28 persons committed in 1868, against St is
1867 ; manslaughter, 16 in 1268, and 8 in 1861;
rape, 31 in 1868, and 28 in 1867—making a tot,/
for these three crimes of 75 in 1868, and 67 in 186'.
The whole number committed to the State prison
in 1868 was 180, against 128 last year ; the n 01-
ber in that prison, October 1, was 558, and the
average number for the year 546, against 537 in
1867. Except for drunkenness it is not thought
that the commitments are really, though they are
apparently, in excess of former years, calculating
the increase in population, the longer sentences, and
the fewer pardons.

LADVERTISEMENT.I-110110Wity'S Ointment and
Hereditary predisposition, exposure to cold, and errme°;
diet, subject thousands to sickness who fear to seek ill
cal aid because their means are too narrow to discharge ltio
heavy cost. Rheumatic and gouty affections soon yielAcit,d
the soothing influence of Holloway's medicaments. .I'-"'"3
fomentation the Ointment only requires to be well rubbe,,
on the part affected, to lessen the inflammation and to Or,
due the throbbing pain. It leaves behind neither swellilib'
stiffness, nor lameness. By carefully attending to the !o°6
structions folded round Holloway's remedies recent P9'lo
in muscles, joints, or sinews may be readily overcome, aid
mobility be restored in chronic cases where rigidity

resul tea. ota
LADVERTISEHENT.]—Avoid Medicines: they always aggr-,408
chronic complaints: but Du Barry's delicious health-T.OO .o,
Revalenta Arabica Food, which yields three times the .notlrAvg,
ment of the best meat, saves 50 times its cost in other tell, odd
and invariably restores perfect digestion, strong nerves, el'ool
lungs, healthy liver, pure blood, refreshing sleep, fun° Viro.
regularity, and energy to the most disordered or enfeebled. ,red
extract a few out of 68,000 cures ;—" The Pope's health rest 866.
by Du Barry's Food. Cure No. 68,413. "Rome, July 21, 1',03,
—The health of the Holy Father is excellent, especially 81019
abandoning all other remedies, he has confined himself e0"060
to Du Barry's Revalenta Arabica Food. of which he cone,,tior
a plateful at every meal. It has produced a surprisingly
flcial effect on his health, and his Holiness cannot praise th?oofe
lent food too highly." From the "Gazette du Midi, July 25 , iicer
No. 58,216, of the Marchioness de Brehan, of seven years ,093
complaint, wasting away, debility, nervousness, with a net 04
palpitation all over, bad digestion, constant sleeplessness,,ra,
the most intolerable nervous agitation.." Cure No. 1,771; 'orEi
Stuart de Decies, Lord Lieutenant of Waterford, of manY,/freei
dyspepsia. No. 49,832: " Fifty years'. indescribable agora'
dyspepsia, nervousness, asthma, cough, constipation, flafu.,o
spasms, sickness, and vomiting.—Maria Joly."—Ctlr°,oo,
46,270: Mr. James Roberts, of Frimley, Surrey, of 30 I 00.
diseased lungs, spitting of blood, liver derangement,rods
partial deafness. Important Caution.—Beware of the ;01
unsavoury and more than sloppy imitations to which, Nc'obe
duthority, Baron Liebig's name is most audaciously MO.
In tins, at is. lid.; 1 lb., 2s. Id ; 2 lbs., 4s. 61; 5 lbs., ;016)
12 lbs., 22s ; 2llbs ,40s —Also Du BARRY'S REVALENTA A",is 61
CHOCOLATE POWDER is packed in tin canisters; For 12 cutr3ool
25., for 24 cups at 3s. 6d., for 48 cups at 65., for 288 cups „to
for 576 cups at 555. Being about one penny per cup. IBolc
I and 555. tins are sent free of carriage in England on 0.
o Post Office Orden—BAßßY DU BARRY and CO.,
Regent-street, London and all Grocers and Chemists.

Births.
,1,1)0t°
CANNING—On the 14th inst., at the Manor House, •°"'
Langley, Herts, Lady Canning, of a son. the
FANE—On the 13th iust., at Cokethorpe-park,
wife of Capt. J. A. Fane, of a daughter.
NEWMAN—On the 15th inst., at Mamhead Park, Pfr
Lady Newman, of a daughter.
Marriages. mirel
CROSBIE —ANSTACTIIER—On the 14th inst., at Ednw oti
William Talbot Crosbie, Esq., of Ardfert Abbey( cob
Kerry, to Mary Jane, relict of the late Sir gale
Anstruther, Bart., of Balcaskie, Fifeshire. iPcj‘'
LOADER—Wrisos—On the 14th inst., at St. John't _Aden
coy, James John, eldest son of the late Jameo Jivroalif
E.q , of Tabernacle-walk, Finsbury, to Mary 14.1i0010'
second (laughter of Frederek Wilson, Esq., Nigh'
road, Clapton.

;100°rt'll,