The Sun.
London, England, 1850-06-14 00:00:00

BERMUDA.

Mr. HUME moved for a return of the several public
establishments at Bermuda, on the Ist day of January,
1830, stating the name and rank, pay and allowances of
every kind, of the garrison; also, the number of officers
of every class, civil and military, under his command,
in detail, stating the name, the office held, the duty to
be performed, the pay and allowances of every kind re,
ceived by each officer; and the amourat of contingent ex•
penses of every kind incurred, so as to exhibit the total
charge of the garrison staff and establishment (the
troops excepted) for the y est- ended the 31st day of
December, 1849: similar return of all officers,
civil and military, belonging to the Ordnance
department, &e. Similar return of all officers, civil and
military, belonging to the Naval and Vietnalling depart-
ment,
stating the number of hulks and vessels, houses and
buildings for their use, and the total charge for the year
ended the 31st day of December 1849. Similar return of
the Medical department, and the number of hospitals and
buildings for their use, and the total charge for the year
ended the 31st day of December, 1849. Returns of
the troops, infantry, artillery, pioneers, and marines, on
the ltt day of January, 1850, distinguishing the number
of each rank, and included in any of the previous re-
turns. Of the number of convicts at Bermuda, on
the Ist day of January, 1830, the number of hulks
and barracks for their reception, and the establishment
of all classes maintained for them, and the aggregate
charge in the year ended the 31st day of December,
1849; and, of the total fitnount of revenue collected at
Bermuda in the year 1849, stating the several sources,
and the amount derived from each source ; also, a return,
in detail, of the manner in which the revenue for that
year was appropriated.—Agreed to.
HOME-MADE SPIRITS.
Colonel DUNNE would be glad to hear from the
Chancellor of the Exchequer whether the report of the
resolutions relative to home-made spirits. agreed to on
Tuesday night upon the motion of the Noble Lord the
Member fir Kildare (Lord Naas), would come on to-
morrow?

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER—It does
not depend upon me whether it will come on or not.
Mr.F. MACKENZIE intimated that the report would
certainly be brought up to-morrow.-- (A laugh.)
BOARD OF HEALTH.
On the motion of Mr. MO WATT the following re-
turn was agreed to.—Copies of the reports of any engi-
neers or surveyors, together with the plans and sections,
and estimates of cost, upon which the report and recom-
mendation of the Board of Health are founded, for sup-
plying the metropolis with water from Bagshot-heath.
THE STEANI.ENGINE IN OLD PALACE-YARD.
Lord ARUNDEL and SURREY said, with reference
to the conversation which had taken place about the
steam-engine in Old Pahice yard, it appeared there
was a strong feeling against the impropriety of
erecting such a machine for disturbing the sewage ;
and as the Noble Lord, the Chairman of the Corn-
mi,sioners of Sewers (Lord Ebrington) did not
feel disposed to remedy the nuisance, he (L ird Arundel
and Surrey) hoped the Secretary of State would take
some steps to protect the House against it.—(A laugh.)
Sir G. Grey joined in the laugh but rondo no further
response.

THE RAILWAY AUDIT BILL, ''77,7
On the motion of Sir G. GREY, the Ruilwuy Audit
Bill was read a first time, and ordered to be read a
second time onThur.day next.

SUNDAY TRADING BILL.
Mr. BARING WALL asked the Hon. Member for
Lambeth if he would consent to poitpone the second
resding of the Sunday Tradin Bill till Friday week?
Mr. C. PEARSON said that, providin= tha- h.. could
see some opvriunity of ringing on ihe Bill of, Wedtie
day week, he should have no chjection to poelporu. the
.Bill till Wedne,day week; but otherwise, et this late
period of the s,sision, h, et,_ul,l not con„rit.
COUNTY COURTS EXTENSION BILL,
The House, then wait into Committee on this Bill;
lir. BERN AL 'n the chair.

The ATI OItNEY-GENERAL proposal several ad-:
ditioual clauses, which were ordered to be brought up.

Sir J. GRAHAM said that he had to make the same
complaint that he had made yesterday; he could not
hear a single word of what, was going on. He wished to
call the attention of the Government to the evidence
which had been gime before the Committee on this Bill
by a genilemon in the Treasury-office. He understood
that these clauses were respecting the clerks to tee
judges in the county courts, and he was very strongly of
opinion that these clerks, though they were ap-
pointed by the Judges and approved by the Lord Chan-
cellor, should be under some general superintendence,
say of the S-cretary of St ite for the time being. He
thought that the opinion of the ccuntry had been pretty
loudly pronounced in favour of the extension of these
courts. There were many other suggestions of very
great importance pointed out by the evidence, but he
would not dwell on them, because, as the law now stood,
the executive had the power of carrying them out. He un-
derstood that a commission of five County Court Judges
had been appointed by tho Government, to consider what
alteratione in the practice of the courts might be advis-
able. As to the present clause he would suggest that
the Attorner-G- n, ral should carry it a little further.
Sir G. GREY said he believed that great inconveni-
ence had resulted from the mode in which the clerks
were appointed, because sonic of them resided in London,
and, therefore, were obliged to be represented by depu-
ties who were sometimes very efficient. but the Govern-
ment had no powt r of interference except in eases of mis-
conduct. -The commission to which the light Hon.
Baronet had allueed was appointed under the Act
passed : last session, and it was the intention of
the Executive to adopt any alterations in
the prucice of the courts which they 'eight think
necessary.
In reply to Sir JAMES GRAHAM',
Sir G. GREY said the suggestion to diminish the
number of pieces where cases were tried was under the
consideration of the eieverrmer►t.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, in reply to Mr. B.
Deideoe, said it was his inteuton to produce a general
clause to dismiss clerks for misconduct.
The A PTORNEY-GENERAL said, in consequence
of the representations made to him, he proposed to
leave out, the clause which he had been induced to in-
sert. to allow parties to serve their own summonses, as
he found that practice would give rise to considerable
objections.
Sir G. PECHELL said, although the Attorney-
General spite on his side of the House he had scarcely
heard a word uttered by Hear, hear.)
Mr. HUME said he also found it impossible to hear
a word, and suggested that they should retire to the
old House.—(clear, hear.) The only speech he had
heard was that of the Right Hon. Baronet opposite (Sir
J. Graham).
Mr. GOULBURN said it was rather singular, but
although he heard the Attorney-General, he could not
hear Sir James Graham, notwithstanding he sat behind
him.—(Lauehter.)
Sir JAMES GRAHAM said if that ware so, it was
owing entirely to the defective construction of the House.
Members could hear what passed on one side but not
on the other, and such being the case it was impossible
to go on with business in Committee.—(llear.)
Mr. STAFFORD said he took great interest in the
Bill, but was in the same predicament as the other Hon.
Members.—(Hear.)
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said, at present, as
the Act was worded, if a party laid his plaint, and
served it upon the defendant, even though the de-
fendant might not intend to make any defence, the
plaintiff was obliged to go into court with his case, and
incur all the expense of proving it, even though it was
an undefended plaint. Ile now meant to propose a
clause the object of which was, whether the defendant
was served with a plaint or not, if he knew a suit was
about to be instituted he might with the plaintiff agree
about the amount of the debt and caner that agreementin
writing:with the clerk of the court, and thereupon tee
Judge should proceed to hear and dispose of the cause.
It would be a most economical measure, and he (the
Attorney-General) thought it would be a satisfactory one.
Mr. 11 rzßoy objected to the clause, on the ground
that parties personating a plaintiff or defendant might
impose a statement as to the amount of debt on the clerk
of the court.
The clause was agreed to without a division.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL proposed another
clause imposing certain conditions on the plaintiff and
defendant, in case they agreed as to the amount of the
debt.—Agreed to.
Mr. HENLEY offered some objection to the clause.
After a few words from Mr. DENISON,
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said that he would
consider the matter, and make some amendment in the
clause on bringing up the report.
Clauses G and H, relating t the appointment and dis-
missal of clerks and assistant-clerks, were then agreed
to Deter a short discussion, in which Mr. Aglionby, , Sir
G. Grey, and Mr. Mulliegs, took part.
0.1 clause I, which provided for the hiring of town-
halls and public buntlines for the holding of th courts,
'the AT I'ORNEY-GENERAL said that this clause
had been brought under the attention of the lion. Mem-
ber ter Liverpool, and that Hon. Member had drawn up
a clause which be proposed to .substitute for hi* own.
Mr. HENLEY agreed with the principle of the clause,
but thought some words ought to be introduced to pre-
vent any expense falling on the county in respect to the
repairs requirel, in consequence of the town-eull, ur
other county building, being used by these courts.
After a short discussion the clause was agreed to.
The other el3uses proposed by the Attorney-General
were then put and agreed to.
Mr. MITCHELthen rose to propose the Billowing
clause-:—Be it enacted, that nothiNg• contained in this
Bill shall take away the power of the judges of the :Alpe-
rior courts to make, or shall inter ere with the exercise
of their discretion in making, orders for holding de-
fendants to hail in actions commenced in the superior
courts for claims nut exeeedieg 501.; and that when,
in any action, any such order shall remain, the provi•
sions of this Act shall not apply with respect to such
action.

Af.sr a few words from the ATTORNEY-GENE
RAL, the clause was agreed to.
M'CULLAGEI moved the following clause.—
" And be it enacte i, that the court shall, after the first
day on which it shall sit in each district or place, com-
mence its sittings not later than nine of the clock in the
forenoon, save when prevented by the illness or utia-
voidable absence of the judge appointed to preside in
such court; and that no trial, case, or business shall be
entered upo❑ after the hour of six cf the clock in the
afternoon of any day, by such court, except at the re-
quest of both parties."
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL opposed the clause,
which he thought would unduly interfere with the dis-
cretion of the judges of those courts.
Lord D. C. STUART also opposed the clause.
Mr. M'CULLAGII said he heard of instances in
which the judges of those courts had commenced the
hawing of cases after midnight. But if the Committee
did not approve of his motion he should not press its
adoption.
The clause was then withdrawn.
Mr. CROWDER rose to move certain clauses which
would give a right of appeal from the decisions of the
,judges of those courts. The Hon. and Learned Gentle-
man said that that right had been given in the Bill which
had originally been introduced by the Hoe. Member for
Lewes (Hr. Fitzroy). But objections having been urged
against the mode in which the clauses conferring that
right had been framed, those clauses had been withdrawn.
He found, however, that it was proposed that the right
of appeal should be given by the Bill then before the
Committee. Now, he thought that such a proeueding
would be most unreasonable, and he was at a loss to
conceive any ground on which it could possibly be jus-
tified. The establishment of those courts had been
first suggested in the report of the Law Commis-
sioners, published in the year 1833, and it had
been stated by Lord Cottenham, when the first County
Courts Bill had lei en adopted, in the year 1846, that
that measure had been founded on the report of those
Law Commissioners. It was a remarkable fact that in
the discussions of that measure ho did not find that a
word had been said either for or against an appeal
clause. The report of the Commissioners of 1833 stated
it as the opinion of the Commissioners that to disallow
the power of appeal altogether would be attended with
considerable ineutivenieece, and that ►he lads of justice
would be best attained be permitting appeals under cer-
tain restrictions. In 1841, he found Sir E. fiugden
staing in the House of Commons, in reference to that
subject, that ro maintain is proper check on the judges
two things a ere necessary—a vigilant, intelligent, and
independent bar, and a court of. app-al; and that, with-
out these checks, very few of them would do their duty
in a manner satisfactory to the public. A very remark-
able instance had been communicated to him by a learned
friend of his. The other day a case occurred in one of
the metropolitan srasll debts courts, in which a decision
was cited which had been given in the Court of Ex
chequer, to the authority of which the judge of the
court bowed, and decided accordingly. Tne party
engaged on the other side stated that the judge
of an adjoining metropolitan court had d.-tided
in opposition to that judgment ; and the judge of a third
and neighbouring court said that he should in such
cases always decide upon his own judgment. And why
not ? There was nothing to control him. The re4usal
of an aepeal was opposed ti the principle upo❑ which
the law was administered in this country. It must be
recollected also, that, although in the appointment of
judges to these courts there was a restriction to barris-
ters of seven years' standing, the judges had the power
of appointing deputies to act for them, who might be
barristers of only three years' standing. Would they
then permit questions involving an amount of 501. to be
decided by such judges ? It appeared to him that they
wished to destroy the efficiency of the Bill, and raise the
voice of the whole country against it as much as it had
been hitherto raised in its favour, which he admitted
they would accomplish by passing it without permitting
a power of appeal. He admitted that an appeal
could not be given without creafing some delay and
some increase of expense ; but he had endeavour° I to
frame his clauses in such a manner as to obviate
these objections as far as pos►ible. He would not read
the clauses which he was about to propose at length, but
merely sta'e the effect of them. First, he proposed to
give an appeal in cas s where the dispute was not on
points of law or the ruling of the judge. In such cue& s
he proposed that the judge should have the power of
allowing a❑ appeal. With respect to the other clauses,
they were framed with the view of allowing an appeal
on points of law, and this whether the judge permitted
it or not, where the sum sought to be recovered exceeded
20/. in anions of contract, or 51. ill actions of tort. In
these cases, if the decision of the jege was obk(:ctem.n.
the matter went up to the ,uperi, r comes at
judge
i
chambersster, thei i
%cdai teri3u, ayTionett.irimit.tiaTled,
Lelei.driiocda disrobes

concluded by moving his (nausts.
Mr. FI; ZitOY said that tile Ilion. and L:.arred At-
torrmy-Geut•ral had sail last year that he was oppwed
to an appeal, arid he had th,refore ornittpd any ptovi-
si It. h,r that purpo,e in his Bill this year. I. re_
ett fere to the question itself, be thought that it' tin y
adopted the appeal proposed in matters of fact al won

as in matttrs of law.°) they would superadd-----dirglY tuinglede
e
vsntages to those already suffered by the enter
suitor. Ile would support the Hon. and Len"d At
torneysGeneral, if he would move the rejection f
clauses. wcak
Mr. CROWDER sad the judge's permissi°P,
he r. quised where the error arose on matters of l'ite
Sir G. GREY had stated on a former occasion lateh'ell
they extended the sphere of the county ccel-r3,'n jig
would run the risk of depriving them of their P`Tofig.
eleunnt; and that if they materially enlarge[[ Orin,
diction, the question of an appeal would be raised. :t ot,
House had (held.- d on extending the jurisdiction tov‘jrio:
but his wish was to retain the character of these eau
and would therefore oppose the clauses. to till
Mr. AGLIONBY objected to the provision dee
iviol
appeal on matters of tact, which said that t, °f the
should state, at the end of his notes, to what Part
cal,
evidence he attached credit. Ile objected to tbe.l'artto
and would rather submit to a decision against hi
try A
an appeal. ir't'n
The T FORNEY-GENERAL said it " his 11 OAS
tion to ()pp se is
the clauses. He was quite nieces[
sees
much might be said as to the profriety of on
the case of large sums, but to introduce
w sold he to destroy the principal oaject of sir'
if PoSS
rased
which way to have summary, cheap, and,
satistactery decision. But the noose having ego; it
it decelsd in t-avoer of the jurisdiction, tboea•
it iuto.htvuro.
to tie his du:y to assist as far he could in inakieg tb
, fie fe
.ure as perfect us possible.—(llear, hear.) esas
by introducing these de110... the), would do gen
_sloe
chief, hy destroying the effleierai, and general 013.`,00 be-
of the courts. Then he objected to the distiuc,,fid is
tween the ca-es in watch the appeel was alto ought
oaght
whicti it was retustd; if any appeal was allolf:ee
io be general.
Me COCKBURN said there was net 9' mo_ no.
entious or mere warm friend than himolt tooteesrdmi•
cipl.4 of these courts. He was for lornii6ing aior(' tc;
uistration o' justice as far as possible, tied " of
see these courts gradua'ly absorb the greater P how'
the legal business of the country. He tboug7l9,los
ever, an appeal essentially necessary. lie b‘ad:atty,
seen the judge—however exalted in point ol 6" 5'4
tee ray, aed position—oil whom the conseiousnie:orf
superintending power would not be attended bYrd COW
results. There was no judge—not even the 11, wsi
cellor —who was not subject to some appeal. the Prip
jece d that these chutes would interfere Tl 4"
eified the
ciple of the Bill, which he admitted ti be Cb
mars, and speedy justice ; but when they
jurisdiction to amounts above 201., they were in:Ct
turisclic;
a new class of business. Under the extend°lice
lion, questions involving very intricate aud Core,r4ool4
questions of law would be brought betore these ' ye 03'
and unless they had some appeal they would ha
flitting decision;; without cud. cast of
Sir J. GRAEIA., ,as all'anxious for the 5° tha;
the Bill as the Hc:*WLeitrned Member for SO glad
ton, who had just spoken, and. he was eXtrere, core'
th the Goverucnent hal taken their Pres°. et P°9;
They had endeavoured to make this Bill les far tot c'
sible in coeformity with tho reasonable exPecti 01e)
lieober
the people. He was not in a position to ontr
able arguments used by the Hon. and Learned
~deot
to
who had just spoken. It might have been Pr'" of Ole,
have waited somewhat longer to see the worki9gted [bat
system before extending it further. He adratteleci°l°,l
it would be impossible to secure uniformity ee'e. 31; ',A"-
amongst the sixty judges without a court or afre 00,"
if the two Hon. and Learned Gentlemen who lePfotbs
its introduraion into the present Bill were to argnet,:d belt
wisdom of Solon, it was their misfortune, $4 It
be told
the misfortune of other eminent personages, t°6; epiei'd,
'
;
" These arguments are urged too late." It was S"-bst fr°-
in this country that in the superior courts, vd
the delay of process and the expense, justice
dear. They, therefore, desired a more surnrfe,,fotii:
ready process. He feared that this cheap tied
be found imperfect, as compared with that hhr• ill
had hitherto been accustomed to see admiiiiefered•of the
he also had some leers as to the indirect e&,61,1 eec°l3,,i
measure on the bar at Westminster Hall, which beg,
sidered the proudest ornameut of this country► I opd
men who were the defenders of our liberties, ti sere
whom we were under eternal obligation. If tilit-1?11,
to be the result, he should bo aggrieved; but
judgment of the people had gone forth that Wet, debt,
proceeding in the superior courts with reference to • d
of 501. was so extravagantly dear as to amount !fed to
nial of justice, and that they were, therefore, re!yt
try the experiment. He would not cuter Inffitill
question as to ehether this was the best gouda et. ;pest
the appeal, but would treat it as a question e
or no appeal, and felt that if they granted SO nap;°'
all they would violate public opinion, and plunder 11°'
long into all the costs and delay- of the fore-e 3
ceedings. t to heel
Sir R. INGLIS thought it quite as importandoolr
certain justice us to have cheap, speedy, end,:4l
justice. Without appeals they would have a" the [
ere
which attended taeir former election coaniltl:ee,leciii7
it was impossible to form any idea of what the'r,,,itsiti
woul,i except by looking at their shicual eeti";vress:,
Disclaiming any wish to fu tter or impede the'
the 13i11, hut rather desiring to make it more Per feet,
would give his support to the proposed clause.
Mr. S. WORTLEY doubted whether these se bees
sist,A the introduction of these clauses were:Lbst
friends of the Bill, for his firm conviction we'%-oies';;
less some provision was introduced within a %Lot'
tively short tune the measure would be as unrerse
it lie-,
was now popular. The principal objection tese-te lstet
was the expense; but here the appeal might bear
citorti:
trifling expense, as in the case of appeals fro.
°prod
sessions
Itwassaidorthtabteafiniallpippebault tsitnousledobtletrillbegsyl,l
heardprinciple
it sail up to 101. no appeal was given, LA..O,
that sum it was allowed to the Court of 63
51
that system worked well.
Colonel THOMPSON supported the clausel.,,
Mr. EVANS did not know what might he 11/I•
ij
if un economical mode of appeal could be dev'''" ;OA'
he was sure the appeal pointed out in these clan6e„si re"'
be most objectionable. He had himself a new srll,s
ing in the Court of Queen's Bench, which was thee
year old; and when, under these cireunastsnee
"boat
was again put int ) his hands, he knew net more
than it he had never heard of it before.
Mr. CROWDER, amidst cries of "Divide'" une"Yeel,;
say a few words in reply. Ile thought the ,
ber for Cockermouth and the Right Hon. ue-ile 13'0
opposite were a little too hard upon his clanees'eell slit
framed the first clause in deference to the :LOA d
originally stood—mainly, to give a power of e'fisleees
cases in which the judge permitted it. Ile he"„E‘of,ris
with great attention and respect to the arglitnieleilec
of
Right Hon. Gentleman opposite, but they bil"„l";,,itli°:‘
convince him of the propriety of passing the 131" • 9vb
the appeal clause. Although there might bedeco's'
trial twelve months old in the Court of C2negnolOte,-st
there were no arrears in the Exchequer or id otie-y
Pleas, and the fact of there being cases Yee,r„,% 113°'
not to deprive parties of their right to appeal "-e
thougt it essential to the ends of 'ustice. area"
The Committee then divided, when there llPPeee
For the amendment ••• leg
Against it „, ..•
..•
Majority against the ilendn3ent •••,---„ of 1:,"
Mr. FORSTER then moved the intro
follo big clause:—" And be it enacted, that in ceie
volving matters of disputed account betweoe 014
tics it shall be lawful fur the judge of egeb f
,sic
court, if he see fit, to refer the examinati°n-cibil r;
disputed matters of account to an accoubtot 1;1;011 fille
port thereon, and that the cost of such repot .op of
recoverable as costs in the suit, at the discrut,—
judge."
'the ATTORNEY-GENERAL objected the
and after some conversation it was withdrawn. pilot!:
Mr. MULLINGS then moved the insertion of I"he
ing clause:—" And be it enacted, that the fees ing -
by barrien rs-at-law and attorneys
said cow ts in cases brought within thejPurraiceidiiiebillirerg
by this Act, shall be as follows:—An attorneYyt
entitled to have or recover a sum not exceeding ' den "..,
his fees and costs, whtre the debt, damage' orer
or eel
claimed in any plaint in covenant, debt, dot
soy of
sumpsit shall not exceed 35Z, or more thao 21. 5,,,a '„f
Case within the juristJ• • • to• Act, ll' Ale
j tenon given by t is we- be
o
ease, shall any fee exceeding a/. Gd. be glen ,0
empaiying a barrister or counsel in the cies% eitvr
expense of employing a barrister or ettornefo tf!k‘
by plsititiff or defendant, shall not be allows
and
ation of costs unless by
order of the judge' oi tin° to
judges of the said courts respectively ircPartil
bJ
time determine in what cases such exPenees 5
allowed." 0 of
ib
Sir G. GREY had no objection to the ineerii°
of the
el
Mr.ause, which *es then agreed t
the introdue to of the '
100
following clause:—"And whereas by the 4°-°,ed, it es
o f her present blajesty, hereinbefote reelmsy l
enacted that the jedge of any county court, what dg.
orders consierbing the time times, and -11•011.,11-1,
or
stalnients any debt or dare, gasa Cr costs. fort:Tillie Pelei
merit shall be obtained inthesaid court,recoilf„
debt tn.'
be it (elected, that in any case where anY Ann, 01
under this Act shall amount to more 016 -the psY--);i•
patty against whom any order for et of of
of such debt shall be made, shall be hi„elfarra
trade, business, or calling, subject to 1"-see judge 131310
to bankrupts, it shall not be lawful fo ant of such Ito
ing such order to postpone the Por3rnotith from
beyond, the period of one calendar
04 lc
time of making such order." es under If,
The AT TORNEY•GENERAL j;vrg,,d in some Awspe
object to the clause unless it was innuee'-; CLAY an ,
After some further remarks from of
relati;
BAs", the clause was negatived. I trodutehe-eOl
Mr. BROVIERTON then moyeucotuble iri
d not catch,
a clause, the purport of which we f e
which was ulfimately withdrawn. , eduction Of
Lord D. STUART moved the inir- which -fe,• t
clause to facilitate the service of sutnnion3f„"d pegs°
objected to by the ATToRNET.GENEnAL, 0"
r°
without a division. ....ewe
Lord D. STUART then moved the introntube coos/
clause for the protection of offieerd °f
court in the discharge of their duty. a isTORS
After some objections made by the al'
GENERAL,
. Toe clause was negatived without a diviei°°•
ef„ger
The preamble of the Bill was then agree-
Oughter
which the House resumed, the report wasd
and the Btli, as amended ordered to be prinie • pastel
,
PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND .MUSEUM° ilea
sf
Mr. EwART, in moving that the House resolvwee of
into Committee upon this Bill, stated that tilt
the measure was to enable the inhabitants or her"
which there was a population exceeding 10,000';
p rot
the advanteees of tree libraries and museums. „et.
tmieil that the town council should have the samer, 01
w%s given them in the Bill for the establishnle,7
the
baths and witee-houees, but that the free consent :yertil
ate-payers must first he obtainett. He had inade.s_tiono
)11,efations in the Bill, in ordee to meet the objet first
opponents to the measure that he 1141 wen'
I[l:n:die:ed. Tie inapir, upon the request of a 4. 0
ber of the rate-papas for the estahiishMeUt :000
library aucl museum, will be obliged to put

eons
he f
were
whe
food
don
rem.;

EiII.
and
thin!
peg-
poop
of t
01"

frien

pet ftJ
—(L

were

the peo
then in
upon th
of Scar

the Rig
positlor
it as p,
into Co
Color
tended 1
Mr.
understi
his inte

Mr.
the Bill
olsitnies

payers.
the tens
Payers.
latter.
for the
jest, no
cided by
institute
from the
posed to
should n
As far a
institutir
4,000 vol
of a very
rote for
ing infor
for Duru

Mr. K
that the]
tion.
Mr. S
divide th
house ha
Principle
Mr. Fi
divided tl
port him
avid he m
Mr.AV
oppose ih
Museums
Caine act
cea.ed to
diffused c
'The. IL
Fe

The H
NAL in tb

Upon c
Mr. BI
Port prow
tinges Bil
The Co
Fol
Ag

The Ch
Mr. E%
Wednesda
Mr. LA
Mr. LA
I:s4ll:Q4fls:liTelß2:Mtdiltdhtri:loriw:hren:Yiealgl3tailiflstthi.ilwlotratinli'l
For
Agi
,
matted on

di'au
add 121" Y
the uniorTilid Lear"'t
'rejection of chi
emission wouli
itrers of fact.
occasion th,t4
tt
qty court 3, !, I
If their V P... 1.
lirged the _
be raised. s.lhe;
isdiction to rte,
of these Coo

)vision as to al
°
b t the id
(AL t /be
rbat part °' eai,
!,1 to tbe ollbo
,gainst Mal t

his irtql:
t Iva; e Lbs.
Iola) go"r ill!eti
of 6rbyi,gill
it intl)ht „tut!.
of 811' 'We, 6
.(1, if possi
tug rit,
3v
h lilt it
ietiou, -e
bat
caking be bat
lie felt t
Lnii•
do gerOus atioa
op At
it
disr (3
.
allow" ht
allowed it oug

more
ethe pr
ell to
os•
d a
icing the to
I,d tie twiie„f
ester ForOhow,
tbough4 or yos
e had vf,
Hof 03i' fot
[No data'ou,ll°s rf
jed by "coo'
Lord b•
,be o
.31. I: he priD.
with '- ,Lior
be cheq' d the
e%tende 0i
yere intru_Auti
,Isccic.,
ended
cetcd
d cook I isle,
these trt
le
coll.
rou
Id ha

•-
he
of
,iOl3 lot
of the ie
tt
ced
mey t jo'
bWhed
ieb illtsid,
111 be P,,red
rec°v" the
oot
PsYra)iii
t of of.
reletip,
tdge l'191‘10;
ch
htig
from ."

tood
to
gr 2
ane
e and
or
itioti°l,o
ostcb,

r •
Lion °" 0
ibiched
negst-iI

r°
etiori of
)0 ea‘i
)5141°'•

tate(
tOr n,
wet tii

1311113'if
itie
/10 0)
Ob c •rs
us o
tow - bco
to re
fle P
110'
00 t 01
f 'men he
ye
0 .
bjeCt 1.-
ro
161 j.
131 f °'
po
• 4
OP(''