The Sun.
London, England, 1868-01-13 00:00:00

President—His Grace the Dake of BUCCLRUCH,

This Hospital, founded in the year 1828, the first to estabfuM
the principle of free admission to the sick poor, without the de-
lay and difficulty of Governors' orders, is wholly dependent for
support on voluntary contributions and legacies.
It affords relief to a large number of in-patients, and, in &deci-
sion to this, the average number of attendance of the destitute
sick has for a considerable period averaged between 3,000 and
4,000 weekly.
The Committee earnestly solicit the assistance of the benevo-
lent, as the premises of this hospital are capable of containing
several hundred more beds hadthe Committee the requisite funds
to maintain them.

Contributions are received by their bankers, Messrs. Brown.
Hanson, and Co., Abchurch-lane; also by Messrs. Coutts and Co.;
Drutrunond and Co.; Glyn and Co.; lorries and Co.; Ransom and
Co.; Piescott, Grote. and Co.; Smith, Payne, and Co.; Barclay and
004 Williams, Deacon, and Co.;Nisbet and Co„ BeThersistreiti
and at the Eioeottal. from 10 tali 6. • -

CIANDLES, GLYCERINE, and SOAP.—A
V Gold Medal was awarded at the Paris Exhibition to
Price's Patent Candle Company Limited, for "Candles,
Glycerine, and Soap"—the only one to any British exhibi-
tor for these three things combined. The chief Candles of
the Company are their " BELMONTINE" and "PRICES
PARAFFINE" for those who must have the ex'reme
transparency of pure Paraffins ; their "GOLD MEDAL
PALMITINE" and "SHERWOOD PALMITINE," for
those who, while desiring candles of great beauty, require
also steady brilliancy of light and freedom from smoke
and smell ; their good old-fashioned "BELMONT SPERM
AND WAX," and "BEST" "No. 2," "No. 3," and
"BATTERSEA" COMPOSITES for those who require
only perfect burning without caring for transparency; and
their " CHAMBER" Candles, hard, and of small diameter,
to avoid the dripping of grease when cared. Their new
toilet soap, "PRICE'S SOLIDIFIE GLYCERINE" con-
tains half its wt ight of their distilled Glycerine, and should
be the one toilet soap in use, especially in winter, because of
its admirable effects in preventing chapping of the hands and
face. There ought also to be in every house one of the sealed
bottles of their patent distilled Glycerine, known every-
where as " PRICE'S GLYCERINE," two or three drops
of which, mixed with three or four times as much water,
will in a day or two remove chapping and roughness of
skin, whether of adults or children ; and when this is
effected, a single drop of the undiluted Glycerine applied
once a day will prevent the recurrence of the chapping and
roughness. insist on having " Price's Glycerine" in the
Company's own sealed bottles, quantities of cheap impure
Glycerine being now sold in the shops because of the low
rate at which the dealers can buy it in comparison with
Price's. All the good medical authorities abroad as well
as at home order " PRICE'S" as the only Glycerine to be
used.

" PRICE'S NEW PATENT NIGHT LIGHTS" for
burning in the wide glasses, are believed to be the very,
best Night Lights made. " PRICE'S CHILD'S NIGHT
LIGHTS" are known everywhere, and are excellent for
burning without a glass.

SCOTT'S LIVER AND BILIOUS
PILLS.—A NEVER-FAILING REMEDY.—Prepared
without any mercurial ingredient, from the recipe of Dr. Scott,
of Bromley, Kent, will be found invaluable to all who suffer from
bilious and liver complaints, indigestion, wind, spasms, giddi-
ness, dizziness of the eyes, &c. For habitual costiveness, as a
family aperient medicine, and as a purifier of the blood, they are
truly excellent; mild in their operation and grateful to the
stomach, they create appetite, promote digestion, and strengthen
Kin
the whole nervous system. Prepared only and sold by W. Lam-
baehrtd'bCy oshmemitstd 6, g William-street, Charing-cross, London,
ruggists, in boxes, is. lid., and three times the
surd to ask tor Dr. Scott's Bilious and
geivaelirtilan is.onle: s.h2cged. lie
genuine are a square green sackago, With
Wi Ilium Lambert." engraved on the stamp.

ad, Islington,
GREAT NORTIIERN HOSPITAL,
patients since it was estab-
This
nospistatirhapoCasrlteerdceiolinteyivaenv-d0r4015,1,954
&bed at King's-cross in 1856. Patients are admitted free.
Bankers—Messrs. Barnet. Lloyds, and Co., 60, Lombard-stree;
Ransom and Bouvarie 1, Pall-mall.—Hon. Sec., F. Smith,
Eaq GEO. RSID. San.

--____
PAINLESS DENTISTRY.
aIESSItS. GABRII_Esb,
ntDENTISTS (Established
their Pain-
-43 London. .......• 58, Harley-street, Cavendish-scitutro,
......... 64, Ludgate-Hill, E. 0.,
Li;erpool ...... 34, Duke-street, and
.aasti,ENWortrhA.,-smtrpeellt,LET
explaining
less System of Dentistry, and self-adhesive Teeth without
springs, at BIODZBUS C 11440110. which way be had frau by poi
for four ataraPs•
have justr i ghtn
published .
--...•••••••••••

LOSSES AT SEA.—At the Edinburgh Chamber of
Commerce on Thursday, Mr. Livingstone moved, " That
the Chamber memorialise the Government on the subject
of the numerous disasters at sea in the loss of trad-
ing vessels." He remarked that shipwrecks were
increasing not only in except, but in ratio, and,
guidinal-
though insurance would protect the owner, every ship
lost was a loss of capital to the nation. It was quite
dio meteorologi-
gf
g
clear that the great proportion of these wrecks was due to
causes over which we had control, and thne reme
and dy they
shoulde ssehekipsw;ass—ooofinred thebettertiyfurnishing
cal information ; and, thirdly, the prevention of fraud and
the wilful casting away of ships. Mr. A. Thomson se-
conded the motion, remarking that, every year three , the fur n
mil-
lions of our property went to the bottom of the sea. Mr.
IL M. Smith remarked that colour blindness on the part of
those in charge of vessels was sometimes the cause of the
loss of vessels. Mr. C. Cowan thought the loss of life was
much more serious than the loss of property, and that they
' ought not to overlook the great cause of these losses—
namely, overloading and deck cargoes. Storms often came
on without even barometrical warning, and vessels at sea,
with heavy deck cargoes became quite unmanageable—
and if the deck cargo went to the leeward side' the
ship inevitably foundeced. Mr. Pearson referred to the
Cunard line, which had only lost:one ship in 29 years,
as an example of how maritime disasters might by
care be avoided. Mr. 31‘Laren, M.P., remarked that a
,hipowner who took a deck load was either enriched above
his neighbours or was able to undersell them. Either way
he tempted his neighbours to follow the same course, and
some regulation was, therefore, urgently needed to prevent
the influence of that temptation. He believed if the prin-
ciple of Lord Campbell's Act were applied to ships as well
Ls to railways, and if the representatives of any deceased
sailor could get damages for loss of life on proving before a
jury that the ship was rot properly found or was over-
loaded when it left port, this would be one of the most
effective remedies they could apply. After some remarks
from Mr. M'Lagan, M.P., on losses frem spontaneous
combustion, the motion ins aryyj, to, and the matfier was
remitted to a wrap:allot

While, on the one. hand, the evidence he has
examined compels him to give a verdict to a certain
extent in my favour, on the other, the almost
childish delight with which he perverts it into an
opportunity for vilifying my father is so clumsily
disguised, as to make his criticisms of little value.
1. Mr. Ferguson is not satisfied with having
to find on the evidence,, but he advances a ques-
tion totally foreign to it. His letter is as in-
genious as it is disingenuous. Never mind who
" spoilt ". the Houses—that is a question of prin-
ciple and taste—who produced the original designs
in 1835, before they were " spoilt ?" Mr. Fer-
guson having come forward to record his de-
cision on a professed examination of my pamphlet,
I refuse to release him from his obligation to meet
the main question and the evidence on which it
rests. At present, he has only admitted the force
.of what is supposed to prove that my father
" spoilt" the originabilesigns, but he ignores alto-
gether the evidence on the special point in dispute,
and assumes that Sir C. Barry was the real architect,
for the sole purpose of propounding the absurd,
though amusing, theory that my father " spoilt"
all Sir Charles's work by his " crotchets:" My
evidence all proceeds from the same sources. Half
of it proves that Mr. Pugin spoilt the other half,
says Mr. Ferguson ; therefore, Pugin was the
author of the bad half, Sir C. Barry of the good.
(I don't know whether Mr. Ferguson is a Cam-
bridge man, but I doubt it.) Meanwhile, what
becomes of the Messrs. Barry's emphatic denials,
and Mr. Wolfe's assertion," that all the important
changes in the building which decided its cha-
racter, were originated and designed by Sir C.
Barry alone in the country, when he was not in
communication with my father."

2. I beg to remind Mr. Ferguson that I qualified
my statement about Sir C. Barry being the sole
author of the " plan " of the Houses, by suggesting
that even these must have been modified by the

exigencies of the elevations. The " formality and
regularity" of the south front do not necessarily
prove that it was originally the design of Sir
Charles, any more than th 3 substitution of " pierced
panels and an unmeaning network of flat, over-
done ornament," for "windows, grouped together
with deep reveals," anC. massive " buttresses,"
proves that Sir C. Barry was over-persuaded by
my father to relinquish the latter, his own design,
for the poverty and flatness of the present ele-
vations. Setting aside the gratuitous assump-
tion of all this, the direct opposite is the more
probable fact.--,..Wh0 better than my father could
appreciate " deep reveals " and grand effects of
light and shade, and why knew better how to pro-
duce them? I shall be happy to submit to Mr.
Ferguson a design of my father's, prepared in
1833, showing a facade quite as regular as that of
the Houses of Parliament, having " windows
grouped to gether with deep reveals, and consider-
able light and shade obtained by the form of the
buttresses." The real truth is that my father's
original work was " spoilt" by Sir C. Barry, to
whose decision, as are as " architectural arrange-
ment" was concerned, he was obliged to yield ;
and Mr. Ferguson shows his entire ignorance of
my father's early works in propounding a suppo-
sition which entirely reverses the probabilities, if
not the facts, of the case.
3. The cat and kitten simile is, no doubt, remark-
ably amusing and quite satisfactory to -Mr. Fer-
guson, but for the life of me I cannot see the
point of it. As an architect I know that contrast
is the Pastenco of ;effect. I know also that without
contrast size is neither adequately distinguished
nor appreciated. Neither do I perceive the
value of Mr. Ferguson's application of his
criticism to the entrances under the Victoria
Tower. At all events he has failed to perceive,
from Sir C. Barry's own letter, that he himself
sent the "plans" of this part of the building to my
father to design the elevations, and at
the same time
furnished the dimensions for them. But considera-
tions as to the true apportionment of the various
parts of the work to their relative authors do not
seem to trouble Mr. Ferguson in the pursuit of his
extraordinary proposition. All that is Pugin's is
bad—all that is Barry's is good. That is enough
for him. His partiality is as plain
as it is pungent.
A fair and equitable judge, truly, in deciding on
the present rival claims.
4. As regards the Victoria Tower, the entries
in the diary prove that my father was at work on
the original production, and few will accept Mr.
Ferguson's oracular denunciations of its present
appearance. He complains that an " extinguisher
caps the Clock Tower, instead of the beautiful
design as originally published." One may well
question Mr. Ferguson's competency to set up as
an architectural critic, if he desires to see a spire
on the present Clock Tower ; but what will he say
when I tell him that such a spire on a clock-tower,
proportioned to it, is
actually executed at Semis-
brick Hall, whither I shall be happy to accompany
Mr. Ferguson whenever he may claim my promise
to do so. This building was designed and partly
carried out at the same time as the Houses of Par-
liament, and is sufficiently successful to elicit from
one of the first statesmen of the day the following
expression :—" If I have reason for not believing
all that you claim for your father regarding the
Houses of Parliament, it lies in the fact that the
work at Scarisbrick is so much bolder, effective,
and more successful than that at Westminster."
Mr. Ferguson contrasts archaeology with archi-
tecture, as though the results of the two studies
were absolutely incompatible with, or spoilt each
other ; and that whilst the Gothic revival had
alone been archaeological, the classic was quite
free from this vice, and altogether creative. But
I should like to know, if my father and others
of his contemporaries had not been archaeologists,
where would Gothic architecture have been ? Con-
fined, I imagine, to such specimens as Sir Charles
Barry's original churches of imperishable mark,
which are certainly as free from archaeological
copyism as his classical buildings are, for the most
part, mere plagiarisms on existing edifices. There
is quite as much, if not more, archaeology in Sir
C. Barry's Palladian or Renaissance structures as
in any Gothic works I have ever seen, and as
perfect a freedom from the true originality of
genius. Successful, more or less, as reproductions
or adaptations of existing works they may be, but
original productions they are not. And why it
should be 'culpable and ridiculous to revive the
glories of an old minster or civic hall, but praise-
worthyaud excellent to transfer the Farnese Palace
or the Venetian Library from their own sunny soil
to a London street lam at a loss to conceive ; or
why the architect in his study and adaptation of
theqatter buildings should be less an archaeologist
thah.'the architect of the former. What Mr. Fer-
guson, from his normal condition of fretfulness and
querulous dissatisfaction, ridicules as a fault in
others he exalts as a merit in Sir C. Barry. Hap-
pily he is always in such exaggerated extremes of
praise or blame that his judgment in questions
connected with Gothic art has little influence, and
we may be allowed to place his taste on a level
with his impartiality. He has often done great
service
monsters, but he must leave
restoring what they have laid
toother
isnd
thee
ar
soky in
of g
waste. A man who stigmatizes an architect like
Mr. Street as a mere archaeologist is but little
likely to do more than destroy. Mr. Ferguson
stands in relation to architecture as Mr. Carlyle
does in some respects to philosophy ; he can tear a
fallacy to tatters, but oh ! for something good to
replace it. Mr. Carlyle, however, thinks; Mr. Fer-

speaking of Fenianism and of
with
aean , truly /hrlol
hostile
America, enough observeslvh ie
which does
that Englandnot
forgiveha
Eonotfotghol
England
ol ysdoftuootrhdheesravnli
oslgi
States.
teheesoa. g
oidiscontentedzAeldltiht se bsyelinilrelandipgaetrhe
ynir
gbnhuot buts
moref
te
nn ndirect
w succour,hom
hissv given i vseeit. r
v theteod in
tFenians u who,armies
of
the
moreover,orthT
comehoThus
fromit is
tha America,that
re 1 and, so
and the
cruelly,
so de-
ietolioqtuinituoeusstlyhetrueantievdersi,n,,faorremteor
an immense
enissebmecsojmoreitya
subject of grave anxiety to England.
r 'ees‘rpTaiitltiese Irish,"
continues e
efforts
loyal, but when we remember the complaints they
have against England we can easily conceive the
readinessof
thew Catholic
hawthhoilcihe
clergy,Fenianism, finds in
the people. We cannot too strongly reprobate
the Fenian agitation and the crimes which it has
already provoked ; in the first place because these
crimes are crimes, and the principles advocatelny
the Fenians are anarchical principles ; and secondly
because this agitation cannot but render the lot
of Ireland still more miserable.
But it is of importance to note the attitude which
the liberal Press is taking up towards this agita-
tion. We have nothing to say against the liberal
Press for opposing Fenianism as we do, although
it may astonish us ; but it is good to know the
reason why it does so. One of the organs of
Liberalism is calling the attention of its contem-
poraries to the subject. Some of them had ex-
pressed sympathy with Ireland. " Take care,"
says the other, " what you are about; it is England
which we must support, because it is the last refuge
of Liberalism, the only Power able te oppose the
complete triumph of clericalism,' which is rais-
ing its head again on the Continent." The matter
then stands thus : The liberal Press will combat
Fenianism because it is, as it pretends, one of the
weapons of " clericalism." It will turn its back
/Ton Ireland, as by-the-bye it has always done,
and England, which admires Garibaldianism in
Italy, but fears it at home, is to be defended by all
the friends of liberty. But this is adopting a
course of conduct contrary to that of the United
States, which these friends of liberty admire so
much, but what matters one contradiction the
more? . . . Such conduct, also, on the part of
the liberal Press, is to go against Juarez, the
Mexican Garibaldi, whom our Liberals admire so
much, although, perhaps, because, in union with
the United States, he has forced us to abandon
Mexico before its time ; but Juarez persecutes the
" clericals." Such noble conduct blots out all his
faults.

LADY HERBER7 AND THE WESTMINSTER
POOR.

more to call the at-
tentiontate of extreme
of your readers to the s
The following letter
SIR,—May I venture once has been addressed to the
editor
among th
to
better classwhich
belong ? It is not only occasioned by the severity
suffering
peoroinrginwhtihceh nowexists
'Westminster
of the weather, but by the almost unprecedented
want of employment among the most respectable
of the working classes. They have literally
nothing to do ; and where the bread-winner is
" at play" for weeks, the consequences to the
family are terrible. A case was brought before me
a few days ago of a very respectable woman, the
mother of a large family, whose husband, though
thoroughly sober and industrious, had been out of
employment for months. She was lying on some rags
in a corner of the room, and evidently dying from
want. Too independentto beg, they had made their
wants known to none. Everything they possessed
had been pawned for food, and the voracity with
which it was devoured by the children, when given,
was horrible to see. But this is no exceptional
case ; the overwhelming number of sick calls which
have been crowded upon me during the last few
weeks have, with very few exceptions, been caused
by nothing but the want of the common necessaries
of life. Well may a well-known popular writer
.exclaim—" The feasts and fasts are very well ob-
served in England ; the rich keep all the feasts,
and the poor the fasts !" What I wish to make
people understand is that the misery we have to
meet is not the mere suffering which must attend
the yearly recurrence of bitter cold and biting
frost, but a distress quite independent of the season,
and, moreover, that the hardest months are yet
to come.

Surely there are hundreds living at ease in this
rich country who would gladly give of their abun-
dance were the facts brought efore their notice ?
I remain, sir, your faithful servant,

MARY ELIZABETH HERBERT.

Wilton-house, Jan. 7.

Donations gladly received by the Lady Herbert,
Wilton-house, Salisbury ; the Rev. Francis Kirk,
25, Palace-street, Buckingham-gate; London ; and
the Sisters of Charity, Carlisle-place, West-
minster, London.

.111 E 7RUE POLICY OF ENGLAND

TO TYARDS IRELAND.

Never was there such an opportunity as the
present for English statesmanship to rise above
a commonplace level, and, in a broad and gene-
rous spirit, settle the Irish difficulty. This is
not the hour for recrimination. It is confessed
that England has committed grievous wrongs
against Ireland, against her liberty, and against
her religion in past times, that numerous abuses,
some of a larger, and some of a lesser kind, exist in
Ireland, either injurious to the interests of the
people or insulting to their national or religious
feelings. On the other hand, Fenianism is a
cruel and cowardly conspiracy, it is a crime against
social order as well as against religion, and has to
be put down by the strong arm of the law. On
these points there isno dispute. No Government
in England but desires to remove the exist-
ing abuses, and those who have the interests of
Ireland most at heart have denounced Fenianism
as a crime, condemned by the Church equally with
Garibaldianism. But, after such an elementary
agreement, the difficulty of a real reconcilement
between England and Ireland begins; for, without
such a national reconcilement, little can be done.
Speaking almost as if they were representing, as
no doubt they were, the opinions of a body so
capable of judging of the interests and feelings
of Ireland as the Irish clergy, the Very Rev.
Dr. O'Brien and the clergy of Limerick acknow
ledge in their able declaration the preva-
lence in Ireland of a widespread disaffection,
so determined in its • character as in not im-
possible contingencies to be dangerous to the
stability of the Empire. If it be true that the long
neglect which Ireland has suffered, coupled with
accidental circumstances such as the late American
war, and its results in giving Fenianism a s mi-
military organization, and the spread of revolu-
tionary ideas on the Continent and at home, has
brought about such a state of things as is de-
scribed in the Limerick declaration, every loyal
Englishman, not only out of a sense of justice,
but out of love of country, ought to insist upon
a true reconciliation with Ireland. In a gene-
rous nature it cannot, aft& all, be so difficult to
make the first step. England has not only to do
justice now, but amends to make. When once
the will is there at all costs to make peace with

Ireland, the remedy to her ills will soon be dis-
covered. For it must not be forgotten that
Ireland has been alienated as much by the ill-
will so often shown towards her, by the absence
of sympathy with her interests and wishes as by
acts of positive oppression. The whole system of
governing Ireland solely by the light of English
views, or far worse, inaccordance with the pre-
judices or interests of the Orange party, must not
only be laid aside, but a policy directly the re-
verse be adopted. The people of Ireland are
Catholic and the honour, interesti and of the
Catholic Church must be taken into account in
governing Ireland. As an illustration of the man-

ner in which Ireland has been governed, take
the model schools and the Queen's Colleges.

Both of these institutions were denounced by the
Catholic Church as dangerous to the faith and
morals of a Catholic people for whose use they
were in`ended ; but so little idea has the Eng-
lish Government of governing Ireland in harmony
with its highest religious interests and its
deepest feelings, that for twenty years have these
interests and feelings been systematically out-
raged. Can we wonder, not on account of these
particular acts of injustice and unwisdom, but
of the spirit of which they are an evidence, that
Ireland, under a long course of such inconsiderate,
rather than cruel, treatment, should have ceased
to be well affected towards so unneighbourly and_
unkindly a nation? Protestant and Orange
ascendancy in Ireland has . been the greatest
enemy of England. It is guilty, to a great ex-
tent, of whatever of disloyalty exists in Ireland.
The Irish Established Church, which is a mockery
to the common sense of the country, is as a badge
of ascendancy, an insult to every Catholic in
Ireland.

Economical questions, such as the ',preservation
of vested interests, if so much of the Church pro-
perty as belongs to Catholic Ireland be restored
to her, the endowment of the Catholic Uni-
versity, the tenure of land, can, no doubt, when a
determination to settle them has become a part of
the necessary policy of England, be brought to a
satisfactory settlement. But the will to act
justly and generously by Ireland, which, if disaf-
fected, is not Fenian but Catholic, is what policy
as well as justice imperatively demand. We
must remember that bare justice is not enough ;
we have amends to make to Ireland. And, in
spite of Fenianism and its criminal aberrations, we
ought to do so in a large and generous spirit, if
we wish to win back, as undoubtedly the English
people do, so quick and high-witted spirited a
people as those of the sister island.— Westminster
Gazette.