The Sun.
London, England, 1850-10-10 00:00:00

TEE FEE CH RE P C .

We have received the Paris journals of yo,terday.
The Committee of Permanence, dissatisfied with
the explanations of General DITAUTPOTIL regarding
the seditious cries raised by the soldiers at the review,
and with his refusal to issue a general order On the
subject, and distrusting his assurances that measures
should be taken to prevent a recurrence of the scandal,
deputed three of their members to wait on the PRE-
SIDENT at the Elysee, to request him to countermand

the review fixed ior the lOtTh inst. The PRESIDENT
declared that it was impossible to comply with this
request, but pledged himself that nothing should
occur *to occasion the slightest uneasiness. It appears
that General D'HAUTPOUL at first treated the interro-
gations of the Committee with unbecoming levity, and
was even so unguarded as to give the fullowieg reply
to M. DUPIN'i interrogatory :—" Similar questions are
asked in the Charivari. They are there in their pro-
per place, and you ought to leave them there."
This answer drew forth a severe rebuke, both from
M. ODILLon BARROT and M, DUPIN. The latter
said " Monsieur le Ministre—La legerete de vos
paroles n'est pas faite pour nous rassurer." (The
levity of your answer is not calculated to restore
our confidence).
General D'HAUTPOUL then assured the Committee
that no sfditious cry had been uttered in his presence.
The PRESIDENT of the Assembly asked General
D'lLeuTroun if he did not think that the cry of " A
has le President!" was a seditious cry, and whether,
in the event of its being uttered by the soldiers, he ,
would not only not tolerate it, but would take the
most severe measure to enforce respect for discipline
and for the Constitution ? If that was the case—and
he could not doubt it—the cry of "Vive l'Empereur"
was fully as seditious as that of " A bus le President.
The Minister of War -replied that he had not
heard the cry of " Vive l'Empereur !" that, besides
that, he thoroughly disapproved of any such cry, and
that he could not imagine that the Committee could
suppose that he had authorised any cry of the kind.
Addressing himself to General CRANGARNIER, the
Minister added—" Let the Coinmander-in-Chief of the
army of Paris be asked the question if he (General
CHANGARNIER)gave any such permission or authority?"
General CUANGARNIER begged General D'HAUT-
PinO-UcLhiteOf
00
fb stehrev ea
rtmh ayt,oifnphairsi
iat 1 i twy a
so f n
oCto mb
enfloarned
tehr e-
Committee of Prorogation that he was bound to give
explanations to the Mipister of War; and that, in his
quality of representative and of member of the Com-
mittee, the Minister had no right to put any such
question to him.
General DE LAMORICIERE then addressed the
meeting, and demanded of the Minister of War
what "he intended to do , as respected the future,
and suggested.that the Minister of War should issue
an order of the day reminding the troops of the ,ne•
cessity of respecting discipline, and the law. General
D'HAUTPOUL, however, peremptorily refused to issue
any order of the day, and contented himself with re-
newing to the Committee his protestations that he
blamed the cry which created so much uneasiness and
susceptibility, and he promised that no seditious cla-
mours should henceforth be uttered by the soldiers,
or tolerated by him.
The Committee took note of the protestations and
promises of the Minister, and recorded them on their
minutes.

It would seem to be the fate of the several aspirants
to monarchical or quasi-monarchical power in France,
to have their respective causes irretrievably damaged
by the blunders of their supporters. General D'HAUT-
POUL is the BARTHELEMY of the Bonapartists, and his
conduct before the Committee is as damaging to
Louis NAPOLEON as was the circular of Wiesbaden
to the Cotnte DE CHAMBORD. As though to back up
the blunders of General D'HAUTPOUL, we have a re-
velation made us by the new law of the press, which
shows the poverty of the intellectual support at the
service of the PRESIDENT. Tbere is a long article in
the Pouvoir, full of abuse of the Committee
of Permanence, and of fulsome eulogy of
the PRESIDENT. This article, which extends over
three colt mns,is signed GRANIER DE CASSAGNAC; and
in the Constitutionnel we find an article of four co-
lumns on the same subject, similarly signed. M.
GRANIER DE CASSAGNAC was, it will be recollected,
the editor of M. GuizoT's journal, the Epoque; and
the gentleman at whose house, and with whose pistols
the "practice" took place before the fatal duel between
DUJARRIEH and DE BEAUVALLET ; in connexion with
which duel the Viscomte D'ECCOILLEVY, GRANIEE DE
C ASV AG N Ac's friend, was convicted of perjury; during
the course of whose trial GEANIER DE CASSAGNAC him-
self was severly reprimanded by the court for at-
tempting to intimidate the witnesses for the prosecu-
tion by threats of violence. The advocacy of this
gentleman is not calculated to promote the interest of
any cause. Louis NAPOLEON may with truth exclaim
" Save me from my friends."
Each day brings forth its press prosecution for a
violation of the Tinguy and Laboullie clause ; the
Univers is to-day to be added to the list of the pro-
secuted.

The whole of the fleet at Cherbourg ha sailed fur
Brest.

The ship of the line La Ville de Paris was launched
at Rcchefort on Saturday, with full success, and with
extraordinary pomp. There were more than 2,000
people present.
The Nepaulese Ambassador arrived at Marseilles
on Saturday lab.t.
PARIS BOURSE, OCT. Q.—Latest. Prices—Five
per Cents., 91f. 90c.; Three per Cents., 57f. ;
Bank Actions, 2,275 E

BUSINESS DONE IN FOREIGN RAILWAYS AT THE
LONDON S t'OCK EXCHANGE, Ocr. 9.
Boulogne and Amiens, 844—Great Indian Penisula, 13%—
Luxembourg, 1 LA, Namur and Liege, 8 Northern of
France, UN—Orleans and Bordeaux, 244—Paris and
Strasbourg, Rouen and Havre, 1014—Sambre and
leuse, 3.