The Sun.
London, England, 1868-07-09 00:00:00

DIRECTORS.

INDIAN MEDICAL SERVICE.

HEREBY
for GLEN,T.
appointments aans
India Office, S.W. 10th dune, 1863.
NOETxraCmEinatilons
of Candidates
Assistant Surgeons in Her Majesty's Indian Medical Service will
be held at Chelsea Hospital on MONDAY, the 10th August, 1863.
Copies of the Regulations for the Examination of Candidates,
together with information regarding the pay and retiring allow-
ances of Indian Medical Officers, may be obtained on application
at the Military Department, India Office, Westminster, S.W.
T. T. PEARS, Major-General,
Military Secretary.

DINNEFORD'S FLUID MAGNESIA.—
The medical profession for Thirty Years have ap-
proved of this pure solution -of Magnesia as the best
remedy for Acidity of the Stomach, Heartburn, Headache,
Gout, and Indigestion ; and as the best mild aperient for
delicate constitutions, espocially.adapted for Ladies, Chil-
dren, and infants.
DINNEFORD and ,CO., Chemists,
I.72;New Bond-str.et, London ; and of all other chemists
athroughout.the.worlfl. •

PO RTI NG. —JOHN RAVVIItriS suppliierAhe
LATES t EDITION of "THE SUN" 0,8 0001 i As pub-
-4h0c1.-4, Beth-otroot, city-rad, Ea. -

A Plan of the accompanies this
prospectus. _

Discount at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum will be
allowed on calls paid in advance,
Special attention is called to the fact that the Preference
Shares now offered will carry with them the privilege of
Life Free Admissions an all ordinary occasions.

Applications for shares will be recenved by the Bankers
of the Company. In the event of no allotment being
made the amount paid will be returned in full, should a less
number of shares be allotted than are applied for the
amount paid will, so far as required, be applied towards
the payment due on allotment.

Prospectuses and Forms of Application may be obtained
at 64, Ethelburga House, Bishopsgate-street, E.C. ; and at
the Bankers and Solicitors of the 'ompany.
Intending Shareholders can inspect the Memorandum
and Articles of Association at the Office of the Company,
at any time within the usual business hours.
The following is a List of the Contracts entered into by
the Company, and is appended in conformity with the
Companies' Act, 1867 :
Date. Parties.
10th Dec., 1866. Augustus Samuel Wilby and Michael
Emanuel Rodocanachi and John Kelk-,
Charles Thomas Lucas, and Thomas
Lucas, of the one part, and the•Cotn-
pally of the other part.
The Company of the one part, and John
Kelk, Charles Thomas Lucas, and
Thomas Lucas, of the other part.
31st July, 1867. The Company, and Messrs. George
Forrest and Son.
3d Sept., 1867. Tender -signed by Murray Marshall.
10th Sept., 1867. Board Minute accepting the Tender.
4th Sept., 1867. Tender by Messrs. Kelk and Lucas.
10th Sept., 1867. Board Minute accepting the Tender.
10th Sept., 1867. Tender by C. Schmidt.
17th Sept., 1867, Board Minute acceptinr, the Tender.
27th Dec., 1867. The Muswell-hill Estate Company
(Limited), of the first part; Robert
Cooper Lee Bevan, Richard Lee Be-
van, Joseph Gurney Barclay, and
Henry Triton, of the second part ;
and the Company of the third part.
31st Doc., 1867. The Hornsey Gas Company of the one
part, and the Company of the other
part.
15th Jan., 1868. T ender by Messrs. Kelk and Lucas.
25th Jan., 1868. Board Minute accepting the Tender.
4th Feb., 1868. Henry Willis of the one part, and the
Company of the other part.
31st Jan., 1868. Tender by Messrs. Kelk and Lucas.
6th Feb., 1868. Board Minute accepting the Tender.
4th Feb., 1868. Letter from Mr. Ferrar.
25th Feb., 1868. Board Minu;,e in reply.
11th June, 1868. Tender from Messrs. Sandars.
16th June, 1868. Board Minute accepting the Tender.
This form must be delivered entire to the Bankers
of the Company, who will retain the Form of Application
for Shares.

Same date.

PRICE.. 4d.
STAMPED 5.1.

ROMAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY FOR
IRELAND.

A parliamentary paper was issued on Tuesday
containing Lord Mayo's reply to the recent letter
of Archbishop Leahy and Bishop Derry declaring
that the negociations for a charter to the Catholic
university were not broken off by the Irish hierarchy.
Lord Mayo writes to Archbishop Leahy :—" It
becomes my duty to call your attention briefly to
the events which have taken pl tc.! with regard to
the proposals made by the Government in this
matter. On the 12th of March I announced in the
House of Commons that it was the intention of her
.llajesty's Government to propose that a charter
should be given to a Roman Catholic university.
I said that up to that time we had entered into no
negociations or communications with any one, but
that keeping in view the principles we thought in-
dispensable, namely, that there should be in the
institution an influential lay element, and that the
elective principle should be fully recognised, we
were prepared to listen respectfully and carefully to
all suggestions that were made to us, and to endea-
vour to suit the new university to the requirements
of those for whose benefit it was intended. On
the 14th March, therefore, I addressed to you a
note referring to your letter to the Earl of Derby
of the 23d October, 1867, in .whieh you stated that
you had been deputed by the Roman Catholic arch-
bishops and bishops of Ireland to enter into con 27
monication with her Majesty's Government on the
subject of a charter for the Roman Catholic uni-
versity. I said that 1 should be happy, on the
part of the Government, to receive from
you any communication which you might be-
pleased to make on the subject. On the 19th
of March I received a letter, in which you put
forward several objections to the proposed scheme,
stating, at the same time, that you would do me
the honour of waiting upon me during the ensuing
week. A lengthened interview took place on the
24th March at the Irish Office, in which you and
your right reverend colleague repeated, to a great
extent, the objections put forward in your letter of
the 19th. To these ,objections Lord Malmesbury
and I listened with respectful attention ; and, at the
close of the interview, we requested you to place
those opinions in writing at greater length, and in
greater detail than you had done in your first letter.
A letter, dated the 31st March, was subsequently
received, in which, with great clearness and frank-
ness, you set forth the alterations which you recom-
mended should be made in the framework of the
new institution, as it was described in a memoran-
dum which I had the honour of placing in your
hands. The alterations which you said that you
considered necessary were principally based ou the
assumption that there was not sufficient scope
given to the constitution of the university and its
governing body for the exercise by the Roman Ca-
tholic prelates of their authority in matters apper-
taining to faith and morals, or over the books that
were to be used by the students. In order, there-

fore, fully to provide for the exercise of that epis-
copal control which you appear to deem essential,
you said that it was not competent for laymen or
even clergymen of the second order, however

learned, to judge authoritatively of matters relat-

ing to faith and morality, and that the very least
power that could be claimed for the bishops or the
senate would be that of an absolute negative on the
use of all books that might be deemed objectionable,
and a power of veto on the first nomination of the
professors of the university, as well as au autho-
rity for their dismissal. You also made proposi-