The Sun.
London, England, 1844-06-01 00:00:00

TSUN, LONDON, SAVITRWAY EVENING, JITNiE

On our return towthe gallery, we found
Mr. BORTHWICK bringing forward the motion ol
which he had given notice. He said the Hon. Member
for Finsbury should have made his motion as an instruc-
tion to the Committee, and not on the motion that the
Speaker do leave the Chair, so that now, even if his
(Mr. Borthwick's) motion were carried, it would not go
to the entire rejection of the Bill, which might still be
committed again on another evening. He (Mr. Borth-
wick) had voted for the second reading of the Bill
merely because ho wished. to affirm the proposi-
tion that .these Courts needed reform, but as the
present Bill way not
.such a reform as was re-
quired, he should (ppose it at every opportunity.
He objected to this Bill upon two grounds, first,
that it was in itself a bad Bill ; and, secondly,
that it did not some before the House with the sanction
of the convocation of the clergy, the only proper autho-
rity, to which the subject ought to have been submitted
in the first instance, and not to a CommissiOn, which
was an anti-constitutional body. No one could dispute
the right of the convocation to meet, although they re-
frained from the exercise of that right, as it would not
be pleasing to the Crown that they should do so. They
were as much a constitutional body as that House, .and
had as good a right to meet. Now, if the present Bill
were carried, what, he would ask, would become of the
principle of the Bill of last year ? Either the entire
fabric of these ecclesiastical courts should be swept
away. or they ought to be maintained. The advice of
the clergy ought not to he shut out on a queatiou of this.
nature, especially as they were not allowed representa-:
lives from their body in that Rouse. It was no answer
to say that they were represented in the House of
Lords by the Bishops, for that was not the case. The
Bishops sat in the House of Lords, not as the represen-
tatives of the clergy, but they sat as Barons for the con-
venience of the Crown. lie feared that all Ministera of
the Crown were adVerse to the meeting of convocation,
because of the possibility'of their interfering with party
queitious and interests, and this was one reason for not
calling the clergy together, or consulting them. He
should oppose the present Bill as far as it was possible;
consistently with the forms of the House. If a reform
of the law were wanted, let it be proposed in a proper
aln
and nut attempt to pass an
ill digested measure of this sort. He
should oppose it in every shape, and would divide the
iddicgoensstetiltutai nodna incomplete
manner,onii
Howe against the motion for the Speaker leaving the
Chair.

The House then divided, when the numbers were—
For the motion
.Against it
Majority for the Speaker leaving the Chair —37
The House then resolved itself into Committee.
Sir G. GREY moved that the criminal jurisdiction of
the ecclesiastical courts should be abolished, and. also
their jurisdiction with respect to church-rates.
Dr. NIC II OLL opposed tho motion.
Mr. JF.RVIS trusted that the proposition of the
Right lion. Baronet, the MeMber for Devonprt, would
be re-considered by the Govdrnment.
Sir JAMES GRAHAM said a very strict jurisdic-
tion existed in the Scotch Church.
Dr. ELPHINSTONE said it would be far better to
carry into effect the recoinmendation of the Archbishop
of Giniterbury and the other Commissioners, that offences
of this nature
-should be taken, befOre civil tribunals.
-

v. • a., Y•
Lord J. RUSSELL thought the recommendations of
the. Archbiihop of Canterbury, and other biihops, in-
cluding the late. Bishop of Durham, ought. to be carriod
into effect. _ _ _

'Arr. f.SCOTT said he should vote for the clause as
amended.

Dr. NICHOLL said he considered the recommenda-
tion of the Commissioners was a hasty recommendation
in this respect.
Lord J. RUSSELL was surprised at the statement of
the-Right Hon:Gentleman that tliis was a hasty. recom-
mendation. The CoMmission was appointed' in 1830,
and their report was made in 1831. Thn recommenda-
tion was signed by the Archbishop-of Canterbury, the
Bishops of London, Lichfield, Bangor, St. Asaph, by
Sir N.. Tindal, by Sir J. Nieltgli, Dr. Lushington, and
other Commissioners; and he .certainly would be rather.
guided by the opinions of thiise .persons on a Church
question thus so,etnnly expressed, than the opiniem of
the Right Hon. Gentleman, who now said it was a hasty
recommendation. •

Mr. GLADSTONE said -that the Bill, in its present
form, had come down from the House of Lords with the
sanction of the heads of the Church. The question was
not now whether the Ecclesiastical Commis.sioners were
right in changing the opinion they appeared to have en-
tertained in 1832. They had changed their opinion, and
it was a very grave question whether the Church should
not have a power of correcting abuses within itself. He
thought the Church should possess a power of repul-
sion. The question was not now whether the preSent
tribunal was the best to try those offences, but the ques-
tion was, whether it was not right, that till such a tri-
bunal_ was established, the power here claimed for the
Clnitch ought not to exist in the Church.
4/1.• WAII,BLTRTON supported the amendment.'
1 ht 3 HMIs then divided, when the numbers were—.
.Nor the amendment .................. 44
Against it
Majority against the atnendment —lB
On the admission of stringers we found
,Mr.. WARBURTON contending against the clause
.which gave to the ecclesiastical courts a criminal juris-
diction in cases of what was called brawling in churches.
Mr. JARVIS insisted that bra.vling in churches
ought to be dealt with as other breaches of the peace.
Dr. NICHOLL said that the sacredness of the house
of worship required peculiar protection. .
Mr, WATSON thought. it was a great offence against
morals and decency to interrupt -.spy congregation of
worshippers in divine service. But the criminal law of
the country was sufficient to repress any such outrage,
without the necessity of extraordinary powers to the
ecclesiastical courts.
- -

. Mr. ROEBUCK said the whole object of th© 'clause
was to obtain costs, and such was the object of the sole
remnant of the old gigantic papal- power in this oottn-
; .
try—cll43 e. monkish superstitions
ea
xb
poubt,diei
t(s being a ea a
churchyard than on the hay, had been long since
,atleastgirnatecnr o r
otraetici. e
sense and ,it was too bad to knock a man down in
tirk
in this enlightened age to perpetuate sucka legal absur-
dity told - injustice. He wns one of- those who did not
think that the enunciation of a few words from 4 hutatta

period of nineteen years, 164 days, and some hours.
At length the matter was carried into Chanc,-ry, *here
the trusts of the will were to be litigated. At this time of
a day 'an end ought to be put to this expensive, tedious,
and unmeaning sort of jurisdiction. The Right Hon.
Gentleman admitted that the jury was the proper tri-
bunal in one cake ; then why should there not be -one
tribunal to legislate for all ? At present the ecclesias-
tical court had one opinion about a will, the courts, at
Westminster-hall another, and the Court of Chancery
the Lord knows what ; so that the suitor was in a 'con-
stant state of perplexity and doubt.
Mr. JERVIS opposed the motion of the -Hon. and
Learned Member for Liskeard, who he could not think
was serious in introducing it on this occasion with any
hope of carrying it.
Mr, HUME. wondered that those persons who ex-
claimed so much, against Popery should cling so tena-
ciously to this ab.nninatif m. No sane man could object
to the ecclesiastical courts being- deprived of this species
of power. •

Dr. ELPHINSTONE supportei the atnendtnent, and
said that he thodght the Bill ivouid do more harm than
good.

Mr. ROEBUCK thought ►a. system of registration
would be verjr.salutary, but he doubted that such could
be rendered compatible with the present constitution of
the ecclesiastical law. Ile would suppo.t the motion of
the lion. Member for Liskeard.

Mr. C. BULLER replied.
The Coinmittee then divided, when there appeared
For the motion
Against it • - . l2l
Wority against the motion —63 •
On our 'return to the gallery we found that it had
been moved by Mr. BrothertOn, that the Chairman (1,)
report progress, and ask.leave to sit again.
Sir ROBERT PEEL said this was the first day of
their meeting after the recess, and he thought the Go-
vernment ought to be allowed to congratulate themselves
upon having passed one Bill.

The Coniniittee then divided, when there appeared,
For report of progress
Against it BB
Witlority

Dr. BO_ WRING then moved that the Speaker do
leave the chair,

tale Committee divided, when there appeared,
For the motion
Against it . B2

Majority against the motion ... —43
The CHAIRMAN then reported progress by consent.
and the House then proceeded with the other Orders of
the Day.
Mr. HUME said that as several bills had been post-
pened, he wished to know what measures would come on
next week, aid when the Bank Charter Bill would be
proceeded with.
Sir R. PEEL said it was most inconvenient to men-
tion any time, but he would say the 10th.
The other Orders of the day were then disposed of,
and the House adjourned at a Quarter to One o'clock.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
(YESTERDAY.)

MANSION-HOUSE.,
George Scott, apprentice .to his father, appeared before
the Lord Mayor to answer the complaint of James Ed-
ward Cutler, beadle of the Watermen's Company,
charging him with having, in a skiff, in the river Thames,
on Sunday, the 26th of May, at London• bridge, eight
passengers, the said 'skiff being licensed to carry six
passengers only; and John Williamson was sum moned
by the same party for allowing his skiff to be worked in
the river Thames,. on Sunday, the 19th of May, without
first having obtained a liconse , from the Court of the
Company of Waterinen and Lightermen.
Mr. Cooper, the solicitor to the Company, attended for
the prosecution in each case, and Mr. Wolff, from Mr.
Flower's office, appeared for the first defendant.
The subject caused great interest in consequence of
the late loss of life in the river.
In the case of John Scott, which was first heard,
Mr. Wolff' took a technical objection to the summons,
which, he contended, was in the form of an indictment,
and ought to be aaaccurately worded.
The LORD MAYOR—The precise charge . against Scott
is that he carried eight persons instead of six. All I
require is evideuce to that fact.
Mr. Cooper proceeded to call witnesses, without mak-
ing any comments.
W. E.llone, beadle to the ConiPany deposed, that on
the day specified in the summons, between 7 and 8 in the
evening, he saw Scott row four men and four women in
the skiff, No. 3,524 ashere. The boat was not licensed
to carry more than six. . Witness saw those in the boat
pay the lad who acted as Waterman.
The witness, upOn his cross-examination, stated that he
had seen the boat for about three minutes, and that the
ages of the passengers varied from 14 te 18 years.
Mr. Wolff now would she not carry fourteen passer).
gers comfortably? Witness—Certainly not ; neither
comfortably nor safely.
Mr. Banyon, the clerk of the Company, stated that the
boat was licensed on the 12th of May, 1842, by George
Scott, the elder, to carry six passengers. She was 'li-
censed to carry six, as that number was' the most she
could carry safely. •
Cross-examined—lt was by measurement the boats
were regulated as to the numbers they were allowed
to carry. •
Mr. Wolff—Have you never known a boat able to
carry. eight licensed to carry no.more than six? Wit-
ness-se-No; I think not.
Mr. Cooper—That is my case.
Mr. Wolff submitted that there was no ease at all to
go to the Lord Mayor, as it at least ought to have been
proved that the father of the defendant was a freeman
of the Waterman's Company.
The LORD MAYOR--It has been proved to be- a licensed
boat; and the Waterinitn's Act says that the occupier or
occupiers 'shall be liable to penalty for breach of the
regulations. The penalty attached to transgressions in
this case is stated not-to exceed forty shillings. Nothing
can be more. clear than this case.
Mr. Wulff trusted that his Lordship would treat the
young man leniently, as the violation of the Act was
certainly committed in ignorance of- the law. The boat
in question was large enough to hold eight or ten per-
eons, and that number, he understood, had gone up the
river in her, and returned in perfect Saf?ty.
The LORD Maitoie-e-Tbet is an instance of excessive
riolatien. The. State of the water might have been such
that it large numbeecould have gone in the boat. Now
that the river is in almost perpetual agitation by the
Fleeing of' steamers, the danger 'to life is imminent. I
dare say that in Chelsea Reach many a life has been lost
in consequence of over-lading. Some of 'the boats in
Use are so slight that a man's foot will actually pass
through them, It was bilt.the other day a person- who
fell overboard waedrowned, hectoiee the other person in
the boat could not offer assistance to Incii without en-
dangering his own life by overturning her.
Mr. Banyon observed that the Watermen's Company
had no authority. over wager-boats; which were made of
the most flimsy materials.
Mr. COoper—There are bye-laws Row before the Court
of Aldermen, which are caletilated to remedy the evil
earising from the use of boats which cannot be safely
used in the present con lition of the river.
The Loan Me.eett-eAll cases of this' description, in-
volVing the .hazerd of huMan The, Must be looked to in
the spirit .ef the most searching investigation. As
this.is the first offence of the defendant I shall he satis-
fied with inflicting the penalty of ten shillings and six-
eenee. In every other instance proved I shall inflict the
full penalty of forty shillings and costs. • •
The defendant paid the penalty; and said that nothing
should ever induce jihn to break the law again.
The LORD MAYOR. mentioned to Mr: Cooper that the
reckless Manner in which those who had the manage-
ment of the eteatn-vessels wind' plied in the river from
London to Orevesend celled. eloud for prompt inter-
ference. On one of the late holidays a steam-vessel wes
crowded, and a shower having etinac.on many of themem
deck crowded imvo the cabins. Fine weather having re-
turned a great many more rushed into the vessel, which
then became crowded to suffocation. The consequence
was that another vessel was Obliged to relit ve the overs
burdened vessel of about 150 of licepaSsengers.
Mr. Coupes said the bye-laws' to 'which he hed alluded,
and which he trusted would immediately pass, were cal-.
culeted to remedy that evil, as well as the other mis-
chief to which his Lordship's attention bad been called.
John Williamson, the man in:whose boat the children
were drowned at-London-bridge on Sunday, the 19.11 of
May; was then charged. • "
Mr. Cooper slated that in this rase the penalty was
twenty shillings for working or allewing to be worked a
boat not licensed. The difference bets e n the two
cases was, that in the.foriner {ease the occupier or occu-
piers of a licenied .boat were
"blade liable; in the letter
the owner or owners of the beet not being licensed were
liable, and the difficulty was to find flit owner. -As a
coroner's inquest was .being held, on the , bodies:already
found, the proprietor became known.. •
• The defendant made a rambling unintelligible set of
excuses in which he endeavoured to throw the blame
upon the officers of the Wiecrinen's Company for not
having interfered with other people, whoseboats were
constantly crowded, as if the servants of the Company
could be present at all points Where the public are in
the habit of embarking.
The Loup Meyou—Haye all the bodies of, the chil-
dren been found?—Mr. Cutler (the officer of the Com•
patty) said that three had been found, and that one fe-
male was still missing.
The Loan Mevon—l shall in this case inflict the full
penalty, and Costs.
The defendant threw himself upon the mercy of the
Lord Mayor, and declared that he had a wife and six
children to provide for, and little.or no employment.
The Lome lleesoe having been infurmed:that ihe in-
Kllyarres Th°ll'..6
tv_l
quest was still sitting, said, that as hi all. probability the
defendant would be at sufferer by the verdict of the jury, ALARMED. er-3031"1A's*
in the shape of a deodantl, he should limit the penalty to "
ten shillings and eoets; and his Lordship ordered, that if n ilsv.rnHor.niDngic,kaints.a,-GReiceirigared's,
e'3westrYete Clara Maria, only daughter o' e fort;o
ReTh.
the amount was not immediately paid, a distress war-
_Es q., Dinham Ludlow..
rant should be issued against tbe goods and chattels of Th:s morning, at St. Pancras C
i!uregand-r°44'• 0(0
the defendant. • Spencer, of Illeeheirn-terrace. g -r-/
Krirlrancis oar.° .
cote
Mr. Barn 'on—For seventeen years the Watermen and Emma, the eldest daughter of Mr.
ce, 0
Lightermen's Company have been endeavouring to ac- itreet,.Edgewere-road.
h -Jers .04
complish the okeet of regulating theeiumbers to be re- Om the 28th alt.,
Pejoil Dorset, Eleanor
.ceived on.board the steamers, and we trust that we: shall Balstoe, e, Est! of PlTotrent
rife
of the late Edmund Locker,e
receive your Lordship's aasistance•to.effect sce great a • • - the
7. -
public good. •
. ,foy?
Settle, -
• 1,1 Ile
The Lonn MAtnn—T shall certainly bring 'forward On the 26th .tilt., at klneld, near
o_oo,
,00
the question at the next Court of Aldermen. the Rev. IL J. Stve!;e, aged's. • steve
t St. Saviour's Chure .4stor,
An experienced old smuggler, named Thomas Myers,
4.
1" at HOY bourne, Alton' 000
'was charged by the solicitor to the Customs' with having On t 28th t., _
_nos
Themes Frederick, abed 2n tll,l 280: `lllt at Stamford, William Lieutee 110
been found in possession of five pounds of,tsbacco. • cl•
guilty:
• The defendant, in a.whiningtene, pleade
Esa ci Han, YOrkehire,
Thornalli4r thc°te
try
The solicitor to..the Customs informed the ,Lord
•. n t e n a
' a :cute lt t Tottenham, lees f
On the alt., to
.tre7.lt'eley.-'seluai'er
.11
Pigett, .
to
Mayor, and Alderitan,PlotattelArood, who sat in jurtac- On the. 20t1i .
.... A.
ti..n wilhAtiteleirdshipethat the smugglers were under the Mecklenburgli-siiitare. - mirgaret, re
Vincent-square; impseesien that, -if. they were caught with floe more Onehe 29th'ultein •
tobaecti ie their posseeeion at one, time thate.fite.peund;' late W. Tarte, Esti., aged 82.
°l).'l
wi:.ight, the Act Of Parliament.could not touch them for
a heavier fine than Si. The consequence' of such an im- eye. 112; "Stiiiid,. . TI `3.l`rjli `
LS
Pressien was that' hey sometimes nuide3.each of them, a
London : Printed' and • Published_ Ofeceeseleg7
Strand;ln• the Piedfact of the SitVY
'clbzon -t4 -iteantaitiotatt and • Budakipigibiguiroooki

Mr. Lmeci said he would commit him -(the pnsopen
trial, and asked if he had anything to say in defeaca „is`
V The prisoner, who Was bathed in tears, had nothivg '
and he was removed to the lock- up cell.
is°
Mr. Burgoyne, solicitor to the banking house of Sire
Scott and Co., attended to prosecute, and another Pr'd for
.gentleman, whose name we could not learn, apPair.e'
prisoner.
CLERKEN WELL. 14
al ,
A man -.nailed George Welfare, who is emPloYed
Islington toll-bar, and who has been repeatedlY ctart°
assaults on the police and on civilians at thus
charged with the following conduct
On the-previous night, at eight o'cloCk, police-cflietly
,Harris being en duty in King-street, was PassleL
shop, at the door of whichthe prisoner was standieg, 000
prisoner)! exclaimed,'" Oh', there goes b—
but I'll have a mug at' him." Kiddy Harris wag tb 04
of a most diabolical character; who was some y°,sl
executed at the Old Bailey for the murder a't -,ItY
.wom.woman!,lel
oan under circumstances of extraordinary crn "„eri
repeated this offensive language, and having been,: !Pi
'
from the beer-shop in consequence followed liar' -veil 0
him by the throat, and thrusting his hand bet' lotj
leather stock and the skin pressed his knuckles aganA
Windpipe. A polieeman ',fortunately came up an vilely
Harris from his grasp. , The prisoner, however fas,ity,,,,
Harris again, and clung to -him with desperate ten3so.
_kicked him on the leg, and cat, and bruised the "
coo
face.
Police-sergeant North, 14, deposed that nothilled
exceed the pnioner's violence-at, the station-house.
ctery,,
'an associate of thieves and the most depraved char3t 5911
Mr. GREENWOOD said it was very disgraceful tha,tol.
person should be employed in such a capacity as 114
a public toll-bar, and he was surprised that Mr• to io),e
could tolerate it. The prisoner had done his best, OtV
the constable, and he would send him to' prison, witu°
for ten days. - • •
A PROFLIGATE WIFE.---garah Duch, the wife of
Duck, a French polisher,
.residing in Kingsgate-street'
born, was charged with assaulting her husband. t,lO
It. appeared, from the evidence, that the defean_,,'" i;r
woman of dissipated habits and unfeeling disposit„ r; Olu'lol,'';
J
husband, a hard-working man, deposed that she f
squandered in drink his week's- 'earnings, leaving- " oi(o
little children in a condition bordering onr,,re
tion. She has been frequently brought the of
Court,' and bound over to keep the peace towaru'' ove"
plainant. On Saturday night last he gave her a °To
for the housekeeping expenditure for the week- °II tor:er
last she said she had taken two of her little childrea„,
Chapel, but, instead of doing so,. spent the eveniagl'A,fici
shop with two low fellows, and returned home at 'e<`o4
toxicated, having squandered the whole soveraigripeeei
fivepence. When her husband wanted to have the,,iielObe
from her to get something for supper, she flew at "'she lee
tigt•ess, tore his face, and knocked him dawn; die c°;l
seized_thepoker, which,- haVing been disarmed dopy"
held of the tongs. , Of/hese, too, she fortunate!, ty
before she could inflict any serious injure. tlea to
In default-of die payment of fine, she "Was comnli
tt.
I
'Muse of Correction for-a month. ileg
George Rogers Was coffin-fitted for trial for stea,,cw.,,
pounds of tea, value fifteen shillings, and other 10;40
property of Mr Jenny, a-grOcer • residing In Flat° , 1143
whosti-service he was engaged. thick
Thomas Watson, alias John Boyle, a notorious&11.
charged
.With stealing w necklace, the proPerlYs.llol,Vl
Hone, a poor woman, living in Peter-street, Sao.l.ntive 011#
The prosecutor Was in bed with her children at ieep, be
1
on that morning, when she was aroused from 5',01 014
prisener haVing opened a box inthe room, from og oty
had abstracted- the necklace. She screamed, 1-13`„ 04.1
seen' him before, upon which he said he bad CO"nibe
house with -his brother and a young woman', 01
turned out to be false, and the necklace Was ,n
person.—He was fully committed for trial. if)
TOY
COURSE OF EXCHANGE........(yES.- ' ..43
Amsterdam CF. 12 6 Gibraltar ............ #
Ditto, at sight l2 4 Leghorn .............. P
Rotterdam 2U.12 6 Genoa .......... . .....41
. •
Antwerp , 25 90 Milan ....... ......
...... ,
Hatnburgh MM.. 13 14 -Venice .......... F
Altona ... • 11
13 14i Naples ....... 1

- •
Paris, 3 daySisight 25 65 Palermo per oz••••
Ditto, 3 months 125 85 Lisbon .... . ........ •
."1.

. . . .
Marseilles ..... ....... 25 '9O Oporto. ...... 0
•''...
. ..
~
Bourdeaux 25 90 Rio Janeiro ........
• FrAnkfert on Maine
Petershurg,h, 3 LTA 364 .Buenos Ayres.. ''':,:it
Berlin . 7 NeivVork ,21dys slb 1,/ op
Vienna, effee. 11.3 M.' 953 Philadelplaia ..... ~ 11;, 9,
-Trieste, ditto • • 954 PRICES ofSULL'l3's 7
Madrid 37 • Foreign Gold, b a•- rs ii 0
ri 3 .
Cadiz
%thee 36 New D0ub106115.-' 0
0 ,1,
Barcelona 36 t New Dollars ..... .••• 13
•Siiiille — Silver in rarB-".•

„ 41. J,
ALLEGED URDER AN!) ROBB”' P.-01h;7
curF.—On 'Thursday Mr. Baker and:a jury sat ;i•
time at., the TOwn of Whitby publie-honse, WaPP"
determme the cause of death of Luke Williarns.,/0919frt
witness was examined on Thursday, a charity School otiepsj
Lane, who stated that on the afternoon of Sen,t,'ll,o6
inst hearing. a disturbance in Brunswick-Pli,roWipif",j
there, and saw the windows of Nicholson's houFed 0,4g;t..1
looking through he observed the prisoner Hor.ste
old nun, who was lying on the floor. Ire also 54r,4,/iO,,,cV
jump on the lower part of the old man's Et omacht.n.ell oci!
that his heels slipped off the body, and he neat7.o 01,
wards. , There were present
..A. short andeorcsier/ej
but they. did',-not interfere any way. .Tile dee itot r
bein:4-tbe.whole of the evidence, read over the
ftcontjsfteA
the tom. previous inquiries, and pointed out wh len ut,
murder and manslaughter. The jury then retireuthe 1011,00
an absence of four hours and a half, retuined cbcie onceo !e,
room, saying that they wished the inquiry could 11,11
adjourned, in order to 'see whether evidence as lire,
found to implicate some of the other F? ea
Horsted. The inquiry was accordingly adjourn
day next.

Rect°f
Letts h
On the 28th ult
Harthe lady of the Rev. Joir„,„hW•ni tP6
of St. Olave, in .-street, Mark-lane, of a 'll7jacti ,
On the 28th ult.; at Charterhouse-square' t"
Rev. William Goode, of a daughter. endislr'''
'
On the 29th -ult., at Wimpole-street, C'3l
the lady of William Tillotson, Esq ,of a sea- e are'
On the 29th ult., the lady of Colonel GaseaYD '
Guards, ofa son. Rolf °f •
On the 30th ult., at Bryanston-square, '""
Higgins, of a daughter.