The Sun.
London, England, 1868-05-09 00:00:00

R tssian 5 per Cent., 1822, .£
Do 4} per Cent. 1850
Do 4 por Cent., ISGO

Do 3-Per Cent.; 1859
Do 5 per Cent., 1862 .... 84 3}
Do. Anglo-Dutch, 1864, £lOO Boudr.„ 861
Do. do. £B4 15s. d 0....
Do., 1866, £lOO Bonds B6l. 7
Do. do £B4 15s. do B4l
s %Minima, 5 per Cent —
panisli 3 per Cen . —
Do Account
Do New Deferred —
Do Account
Do Passive —
Do Acc.unt
Do Corn. Cert. of Coup. not funded
Do Account
T a:lcish 6 per Cent. —
Do Account
Do 6 per Cont. 1858 --
Do Account
Do £lOO Bonds —
Do 6 per Cent., 1862 —
Do Account
Do £lOO Bonds 651 4i 5
Do. 1863 --
Do 5 per Cent., 1865 —
Do Account
Do 6 per Cent., 1865 _ 5B f
Do 4 per Cent., Guaranteed
Venezuela, 3 per Cent
Do 6 per Cent., 1862
Do 6 per Cent. 1864
Do. 4 per Cant. Certificates ..... —
Dividends on the above payable in Loudon.
Belgian. 41 per cent., Ex. 25f.
Dutch 21 per Cent. Ex. 12 Guil —
Do Account —
French Routes, 3 per Cent., Ez 9,51. —
Austrian o per Cont. Ex 10 Florins ,
Italian 5 per Cent. 1851, Ex. 25f. —
Do. Account 4Bl
CLOSING PRICES.
Consols, Money 94 1
Do. Account, 4th Juno ... 921 1

LAW INTELLIGENCE.—This Day.

COURT OF DIVORCE.
RICIIARDSON V. RICHARDSON.

This was a suit in which the Queen's Proctor in-
tervened. Some time ago the petitioner, an artist,
residing at 7, Melbury-terrace, Harewood-square,
presented a petition to the court praying for dis-
solution of his =rriage. After hearing the evi-
dence, the Judge Ordinary ordered a decree nisi,
but, from certain circumstances becoming known,
the Queen's Proctor intervened, and to-day a great
deal of evidence was offered to the court
to show that the petitioner at the time of his appli-
cation to the Court had been guilty of the greatest
immoralities.
A number of police constables were called, who
proved the statement of the Queen's Proctor, at the
conclusion of whose examination the Judge Ordi-
nary ordered the decree to be dissolved.
WHITTLE V. WHITTLE.
This was a suit for judicial separation, presented
by the wife against the husband on the ground of
cruelty and desertion.
The petitioner was the daughter of a gentleman
named Spence, residing at Kilworth, near Sutton,
Yorkshire, previous to the marriage with the re-
spondent, who was a cleygyinan of the Church of
England. After the marriage they lived at various
places, but in 1856 Mr. Whittle became curate of
a parish in Berkshire, and a year later on he com-
menced those cruelties which culminated in 1859, an
led to his wife leaving her home. The respondent, it
was stated by the learned counsel (Sergeant
Parry) who opened the case, treated the petitioner
with the greatest cruelty, striking her, and desiring
her to become the familiar friend of one of her
domestics named Alethia Grey. There were at this
time five children living, the oldest 16, the
youngest nine, and unrestrained by the presence
of his own son and daughter, he used to act in such
a manner that it was impossible she could continue
to live with him. _ _

A number of letters were read, written by the
respondent, promising better conduct, but it was
felt, under the circumstances, imperative to pro-
ceed with the present petition.

The case will not conclude to-day. The petition
is supported by Mr. Sergeant Parry, Dr. Spiuks,
and Mr. Serle ; and Dr. Deane, Mr. Coleridge,
and Mr. Montague Chambers are engaged iu the
suit.