The Sun.
London, England, 1850-10-17 00:00:00

TRADE OF HULL.

We are glad to find that the attention of all parties
in this town is now steadily directed to the consider-
ation of the best means (.4 effecting an early reduction
of those heavy charges which- are beginning to en-
danger the trade of the port of Eull. To the Dock
Company the greatest praise is due for taking the
tiative ins meaSure of which" theimpOrtence to the
people
_of Hull cannot be exaggerated.' And now
that we begin to examine the question in all its bear-
ings, we confess •the surprise we feel that a state of
things so long calling for change has been suffered to
remain in the position in which we find it. Why, for
example, should the freemen of, Hull be exempt from
the water-bailiff's dues, while the merchant or ship,
owner from other places settlingin Hull, and infusing' new life and spirit into the trade •is compelled to pay
these heavy and vexatious dues? Why'should the im-
porter of corn, Or. timber' ' or pitch, tow, hemp, and
•- - • •
'other articles be taxed heavily, when linseed and
other produce of more modern, date are exempt- from-
the impost of water-bailiff's dues ? 'Why should
freemen exempt from anchorage, to the' detriment
of their neighbours who are not tree of Hull ? And
why, in these days of free trade, should British
vessels pay nothing for hostage to which foreign ships
,are liable? Why should foreign vessels be fined for
coming to the port of Hull, when the policy of our
corporation should be to encourage the arrival of
alien ships ? Why should the Dock Company, who
have lately expended upwards of half n million ster-
ling fur the benefit of the port, in making decks and
building warehouses, be alone called upon to make
sacrifices to preserve the trade of the, port, to the
exclusive benefit of' the. other corporations, which
have done nothing to increase the facilities of trade?
Will not the trade of Hull decline as the trade of
Bristol has declined if no reduction of our port
charges be effected ? And, in such case, will not the
revenues Of the Corporation and Trinity'llouse suffer
if) proportion ? Is it not the fact that the high rates
of port charges at Hull are acting prejudicially as
`regaids its trade with Northern Europe and America?
And if such be the case, should we not be up and do-
ing .
to preserve our commerce—possessing, as we do,
every facility largely to increase it ? Are not Goole,

Grimsby, Gainsborough, Sunderland, Hartlepool,
Leith, Yarmouth, Lowestoft, Harwich, and other
ports, connected as they now are with the manufac-
turing districts by means of railroads, making every
exertion to participate in the trade carried on for cen-
turies at Hull ? Has not Leith shipped 15,000 bales
of cotton this year to Northern Europe ? Did not
30,000 tons of foreign shipping pass our port last
year for Goole, having on board 160,000 quarters of
grain ? Are not our charges higher than those of
any other port? And are we to be told that the cor-
porations of the borough and Trinity House cannot
lower their rates without Acts of Parliament, and yet
hear of no steps being taken. to obtain such Acts? If
they be necessary, let the requisite notices be given at
once, that the next session of Parliament may furnish
us with the necessary powers for making all proper
reductions. 'We recommend the Mayor to consult
with the Town Clerk upon the desirableness of call-
ing an early meeting of the Town Council, for the
purpose of 'authorising the giving of notices in time
for legislation in the next session of Parliament. 'We
wish everything to be done legally, and in order, al-
though we are not without an impression that the
Town Clerk could suggest a mode of practically re-
ducing the dues during the period between this and
the passing of the Act in question. There is such a
thing as taking a toll with one hand, and returning it
with the other ; and the Town Clerk is as competent
as any man in England to advise the Council how
this process may be carried on, till an Act of Parlia-
ment can be obtained enabling the Corporation to re-
duce or abolish the duties now exacted. The Corpo-
ration of the Trinity House will not, we feel confi-
dent, throw any obstacles in the way of reductions so
essential to the prosperity of the port. The
Brethren are trustees for the poor, and in any
change care will be taken to protect their just in-
terests.—Hull Advertiser.

RAILWAY TRAFFIC RETURNS.
LONDON AND NORTH-WESTERN RAILWAY.--ROttllll of
Traffic for the week ending Oct. 13 :
Passenger, parcels, &c. £27,300 1 11
Merchandise ... ... 18.265 15 1
Cattle ... 1,87013 8

Total ... £47,436 10 8
Corresponding week last week 45,079 8 9
SOUTH-EASTERN RAILWAY. Gross traffic receipts for
the week eliding Oct. 12 :
Passengers £11,774 1 3
Carrying account .. ... 3,340 6 5

• Total ... £15,114 7 8
CHESTER AND HOLYHEAD RAILWAY.—TrafIIe for the
week ended Oct. 13:—

MAIN LLN X.

Passengers £1,489 14 7
Parcels, H..C. and D. ... ... 100 2 1
Goods, cattle, &c. 483 0 4 •
Mails ... 600 0 0

Total .. £2,622 17 0
MOLD.
Passengers ... £37 .4 7
. Parcels, H. C. and D. ... 1 10 2
- Goods, cattle, &c. ... 70 11 0

- • - Total ...

STEAM-BOATS.

... £lO9 5 9

Passengers £lB4 5 1
Parcels, H. C. and D. ... 7 6 4

Total ... £l9l 11 5
LANCASHIRE AND YORKSHIRE RAILWAY. (260 miles
open.)—Traffic for week ending Oct. 13 ....£14,345 10 9
Corresponding week in last year, (196+
miles open) .. ... • ....£14,297 0 3
SHROPSHIRE UNION RAILWAY.—(Open LO miles ),—Traffic
for the week ending Oct. 13 :
Passengers, parcels, &c. ... £294 6
Goods and live stock .. .b. 165 4 6

Total .. .. £459 10 n
Corresponding week last year ... 420 13 6b
.SOUTH WALES RalrmAy.-,Return of trafficlor the week
ending Oct. 13 :
Passengers ;.. 4772' 15 ' 6 ,
Parcels 130 5. 8 '
Goods ... ..• 92 8 9 •

Total (exclusive of mails)... 895 911
CALEDONIAN RAILWAY.... (16Q miles, opened.) Return of
,raffic for the week ending Oct. 6 :
Passengers, &c. 6 3
Goods, &c. :3,958 3 10

Total .. ....£7,344 10 1
Corresponding week last year ... 6,705 7 10i

ENDORSING A HUSBAND.—A tailor, who was mar-
ried to a very sickly woman, got enamoured of a young girl
who lived in his neighbourhood, and gave her the following
promise in writing to marry her immediately after the de-
mise of his wife:—" In two days after the demise of my pre-
sent wife, I promise to marry Miss Morgan, or order, value
received under fifty pounds sterling. Given under my hand
this sixteenth day of May, J. Sullivan." Shortly after Miss
Morgan received the above she died, leaving it endorsed to
a female, who also chanced to take a fever and died before
the tailor's wife! However, on her sick bed, she also en-
dorsed the note and gave it to a cousin, whom the tailor
absolutely married, agreeably to the endorsement, in two
days after the death of his wite ; and it is said the tailor and
his wife are now living happily in the city of Kilkenny.—
Ikenny Moderator.

THE BOYNE VIADUCT.--We believe we may an-
nounce the speedy commencement of the works for the Boyne
Bridge. Men have been taking levels on the site of it during
the last week, preparatory to the commencement of the
mason work.—Drogheda Argus.
DESTRUCTIVE FIRE AT TOTTENHAM.—Last even-
ing a serious tire broke out upon the extensive premises be-
longing to Mrs. Wakeling, situate in Church-road. The
flames continued to travel, and in a space of time compara-
tively brief a small dwelling-house became fired, and the
range of stabling, and by the period the assistance arrived
from London, a barn and its contents, the stabling, and
cottage, were destroyed ; and the *amen only succeeded in
entirely subduing the fire by ten o'clock. Mrs. Wakeling
is insured in the Phoenix Fire-office.

SURREY QUARTER SESSIONS.
(Before Mr. E. PENIMYN, Chairman, and a Bench of
Magistrates.)
MUSIC AND DANCING LICENCES.

Yesterday being the day appointed for the hearing
of applications fur the renewal of licences for music
and dancing in the county of Surrey, and for fresh
applications of a similar nature, there was a full at-
tendance of persons interested in establishments of that
description.
Mr. LOCKE applied for a renewal of the licence of
the Royal Gardens, Vauxhall, to Mr. W. Fowler... •
The Clerk of the Peace reminded the Court that a
communication had been received from the Commis-
sioners of Woods and Forests upon the subject of the
amusements given at these gardens, and, at the re-
quest of the Chairman, he read the letter that had
been received. It enclosed one from Mr. Barry, the
architect of the New Houses of Parliament, in which
that gentleman called the attention of the Commis-
sioners to the fact that fireworks were exploded from
balloons that were sent up from the gardens at night,
and that upon one or two occasions burning materials
bad fallen into the Government works at Thames-
bank, to the imminent danger of the property lying
there, and the Court was requested ,to take some
steps to prevent the recurrence of ,such a dangerous
practice.
Mr. LOCKE said, this was the first intimation Mr.
Fowler had received of the existence of such a cause
of complaint, and he thought it would have been
more courteous to have made. an application to him
in the first instance. The proprietors of the gardens
were anxious to carry on the amusements without
,causing annoyance to any'person, and he must say
that it appeared to him very extraordinary that any
burning materials should have been carried to such a
distance as Thames-bank from the gardens at Vaux-
hall.

The CHAIRMAN said this was a question of fact
which could easily be ascertained, and he asked the
Learned Counsel whether he was instructed to deny
that fireworks had been exploded from balloons in
the air.

Mr. LOCKE said' he would not deny that this had
taken place.
The BENCH expressed an opinion that this was a
most dangerous practice, not only as regarded the
Government works referred to, but to all the pro-
perty in the neighbourhood, and they were of opinion
that it should be discontiuued.
Mr. LocKE said that Mr. Fowler would readily at-
tend to any suggestions that fell from the Court.
The CHAIRMAN then said that the licence would be
renewed on the present occasion, but it would be ac-
companied by a condition that Mr. Foivler should un-
dertake not to have any fireworks exploded from bal-
loons in future, and if the condition was broken, the
licence would not be renewed next year.
The licence was then granted.
, • The licences for the following houses were then
renewed without any observation The Grapes,
Suffolk-street ; the Black Dog, Vauxhall-walk ; the
Surrey Zoological Gardens ; the Rosemary Branch ;
the Castle Hotel, Richmond ; the St. Helena Gardens,
Rotherbithe ; and the Salmon, Union-street, Borough.
There were three new applications for licences to
have music and dancing.
The first was on behalf of Mr. Deane, the landlord
of the Lark-hall Tavern, Lark-hall-lane.
Mr. KNAPP, in support of the application, produced
a memorial signed by the church warders and several
other of the parish officers, and also by a number of
respectable inhabitants of the neighbourhood, praying
the Court to grant the prayer of the applicant.
There was no opposition, and the bench granted the
application.
The next applicant was Mr. M. F. Horsley, of the
Grove Tavern, Peckham.
The Clerk of the Peace said, that with regard to
this application it appeared to him that the sessional
order referring to the notice to be given of such in-
tended applications had not been complied with. The
person who had originally applied for the licence for
this house was a person named Esther Dove, and he
had beard nothing of Mr. Horsley until about a
month ago, when he sent the usual notice to the petty
sessions and to himself.

Mr. INAPT, who supported the application, said
the fact was that Mrs. Dove had got married to Mr.
Horsley since ,she gave the original moticg, and ha
felt sure that under these circumstances the bench

would waive the strict form, and that they would not
decide that she ought to have waited all this time to
obtain her licence before she had got married.
The BENCH said, that under the peculiar circum-
stances of the case they would receive the notice, and
the testimonials presented on behalf of the applicant
being considered satisfactory, the licence was granted.
Mr. CHARNOCK then made an application on be-
half of Mr. Wentz well, the landlord of the Ship,
Fore-street, Lambeth, for a licence of a similar de-
scription, and there being no opposition to it the bench
granted the licence.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.

MANSION-HOUSE.

Henry Denham, charged upon suspicion of having
feloniously assaulted and robbed Mr. Cureton, of
Aldersgate-street, and also of having feloniously as-
saulted and attempted to rob Mr. Miller, of Long-
acre, was brought before Alderman Gibbs fur final
examination.

As the case of the attack upon Mr. Miller was the
first in order as to the date of the offence,
Alderman Gums intimated his wish to go into the
particulars of that charge as the first on the list.
Mr. Humphreys, upon the part of Mr. Cureton,
who was present during the examination, approved of
that course, which was accordingly adopted.
Mr. Thomas Miller, the prosecutor, who gave evi-
dence against the prisoner as having been one of three
men who assaulted and attempted to rob him at a
little after twelve o'clock at night, at the corner of
Rose-street, in Long-acre, appeared in the witness
box, and said—l have no hesitation in saying that
the prisoner is one of the persons who assailed me on
the occasion, and that he put the stick round my neck.
Alderman GIBBS have you ascertained the pre-
cise date of the night of the assault ? Mr. Miller
—The date was the night of Friday, the 23 of August.
At the Gime I was passing my coat was unbuttoned.
I distinctly heard one of the men say " Eyeglass,"
and he was quite close to my ear at the time, so
that if I heard the voice at this moment I should
know it. I felt that somebody put a hand into my
waistcoat pocket and felt for my eyeglass. My trou-
sers pockets were buttoned up tightly, and the attempt
to open them failed. I had a large roll of white
paper, consisting of drawings, in my hand, and when
I was pinioned behind I dropped it. I also dropped
at the same instant (to the best of my recollection)
my walking-stick. At that stage of the proceedings
I believe somebody must have approached and alarmed
my assailants, for they threw me down. I saw one
of them, and chased him for some little distance,
but was unable to go far, or to call for the police, in
consequence of,the pressure upon my throat of the
weapon used upon the occasion.
The solicitor for the prisoner—How long did the
proceeding you describe last ? Mr. Miller—About
one or two minutes, I dare say ; I cannot exactly say,
but it lasted a very short time.
The solicitor for the prisoner—How long did you
see the persons after the assault took place ? Mr.
Miller—l saw them for a very short time indeed, the
business was so well done. . _

The solicitor for the prisoner—And you recollect
the countenance of one of the persons by the moment-
ary glance you had ? Mr. Miller—l do. There was
a strong light reflected from the lamp upon the coun-
tenance, and from the opportunity I had of seeing it,
I swear that, to the best of my belief, the prisoner is
one of the persons.
Alderman GIBBS—Have you any doubt upon the
subject ? Mr. Miller—l have not a single bit of
doubt about it. _ _

In answer to other questions put by the prisoner's
solicitor,
Mr. Miller said the lamp, of the reflection of which
upon the prisoner's countenance he had spoken, was
on the opposite side of the street, about ten yards
from the spot on which the assault took place ; that
the night Was;
_he believed, a very moonlight night;
than the ifidoner's face was turned towards him, and
in such a manner that he could see it by the reflec-
tion ; that he was pinioned by one of the men, faced
by another, and that the third put the instrument
round his throat.
The solicitor to the prisoner—Why did you not
call the prisoner ? Mr. Miller—l could not. I was
almost insensible. The policeman had passed the
place, I believe, two or three minutes.
The solicitor—Why did you not complain of the
attack ? Mr. Miller—l went immediately to the
Bow-street station and represented the case there, and
I also went to Scotland-yard, and stated it to the au-
thorities there. _ _ _

Michael Haydon, the officer, said—ln consequence
of informatioU which I received I apprehended the
prisoner on the 2d of October, on which day he was
examined at the Mansion-house, and whilst he was
there the present charge arose.
Mr. Miller, it will be recollected, was present when
the prisoner was on the previous examination placed
at the bar, and almost fainted upon seeing his face.
Alderman GIBBS then repeated to the prisoner the
form of words used by magistrates when committing
psrsons for trial, and asked him whether he wished to
say anything on the subject of the charge against him,
of having feloniously attacked Mr. Miller, with intent
to rob? The prisoner, by the advice of his solicitor,
said he should reserve what he had to say in his de-
fence for another occasion.
Alderman Gmus—You stand committed.

Mr. Humphreys said that, with respect to the case
of his client, Mr. Cureton, it would be unnecessary,
after the decision of the Alderman in the case just
heard, to apply for a remand. It was only necessary
for him to observe that inquiries had been made, and
were still being made, into the circumstances of that
atrocious robbery, and that if, while the prisoner was
eeodyy the solicitor for the defence.
witha
tmatterhatoffshould
due ariseno
trieclea tsihnogutl
do
ahb tei
InTtgh
aevese Opnc
rl
oodi
nsfonßnie
taeci
rttl
was committed to Newgate for trial.
Mr. Benjamin Webb, of Lindsay-row, Chelsea, was
brought up, charged with hiving defrauded a cabman
named Chamberlaine: •

The cabman said—The gentleman called my cab
at the Mansion-house, and desired me to drive to the
Ship, in Water-lane, Thames-street. It was on Mon-
(lay, the 23d of September. He then directed me to
drive him to the Borough-market, then to Blackfriars-
road, then to the Elephant and Castle, in St. George's-
fields, and then to the Walworth-road. He got out
of the cab in the Walworth-road, and, telling me to
wait, he went into a house, and there he remained for
two hours. He then came out, told me to wait a little
longer, and to get some grub, for which he promised
to pay. I accordingly had some refreshment, and 1
waited for him another hour, and then I knocked at
the door of the house into which he had entered and
asked for him, but I was informed that he had left
the place, so I had to return to town after paying for
my grub myself, and without receiving a farthing of
my fare, which amounted to 103. Bd.
Alderman G inns--I regret to say that this case is
out of my jurisdiction. You must apply to another
court on that point.
Cabman have an other case, your Lordship,
which is in your jurisdiction, as I am told, for he tried
to double mull me again.—(A laugh.)
Alderman GIBBS—Oh, he tried to get a cheap drive
again. Very well ; go on.
Cabman—On the.following Wednesday, as I was
Broad-street, I saw the gentleman again,
going along
and he was ust
going to give a turn of the same kind
j
to another cabman, so I went up to him and spoke to
him, but he pretended not to remember me, or the
fare. However, I was not to be done, as I thought,
again, and I told him all about it, and then he seemed
to have some recollection of it, and he got into my
cab, and said, "Cut away to the Walworth-road, and
mind, we now begin afresh. —(Laughter.) So I
turned round and was going along to be paid my
fare, and he popped out his head and told me he wanted
to make a call at a public-house in Queen-street
before he went to -Walworth, so I drove to the public-
house, when in he went at one door, but out he walked
at the other.—(Laughter.) I caught him afterwards
in Watling-street, but now he does not wish to give
me anything, although I have lost my situation, for
my master would not believe that any gentleman
would treat a poor fellow in such a manner, and turned
me away.
Alderman GIBBS—This case of the eightpenny fare
happens to be within my
jurisdiction. What has the
defendant to say to the charge ? I understand he has
taken no notice of two summonses which were served
upon him? The defendant—I understand that what
I am here for is an eightpenny fare, from Broad-street
to Cannon-street. The cabman refused
to drive me
to Walworth, and I don't consider he is entitled to
anything.
Alderman adjudge you to pay the man
Bd., his fare, and expenses for six days, and the cost of
two summonses, a warrant, and execution.
Mr. Goodman (the chief clerk)—The whole amount
you have to pay here is 1/ 17s. 81—(Laughter.)
Defendant—What, for going from Broad-street to
Cannon-street.
Alderman Ginns—You must pay that before you
leave this court, or go to prison.
Defendant—Then I appeal against your decision.
Alderman GlBBS—There is no appeal. The mo-
ney must be paid. This case is indeed a very bad
one. The poor cabman has not only been losing his
time, but he has lost his place by your gross miscon-
duct. He will recover the 103. Bd. score you ran up
with him on the first occasion.
The defendant retired greatly mortified, and in a
short time pail the whole of the money.
Alderman Ginns expressed a hope that the master
of the complainant would, upon learning that the man
had not misrepresented his treatment, restore him to
his situation.

SUPPOSED SUICIDE.—The body of a respectably
dressed man, about 55, which is now lying for identification
in the dead house St. Mary, Islington, has been picked up
in the New River, near Canonbuty-bridge, Islington. His
linen is marked " D.," and a paper found in his pocket is
signed "J. Daviss."

GAS-LIGHT AND COKE COMPANIES.
Dividend Amount
Name of Company, per of Paid. Price,
Annum. Share.
---- - --- ---
X. s. d. Z. a. d.
British •••••••• •• •• •• 11. 40 0 0 18 0 0 13
Ditto Provincial.• •• 11. Bs. 20 0 0 20 0 0 18%
Brighton •• •• .... •• .. 51. 20 0 0 - -
City of London .. •• •• 61. 100 0 0 150 0 0 -
Continental Consolidat. 935. 75 0 0 31 5 0 -
Equitable.. - .... •• -50 s. 50 0 0 50 0 0 -
Imperial .• .... •••• •• 31. 50 0 0 50 0 0 70
Independent ....... • • 61. 40 0 0 40 0 0 48
L0nd0n...... - 50 0 0 50 0 0
Ditto- - ........ • • - 50 0 0 50 0 0 -
Do., Parl. Preference 61. 25 0 0 210 0 -
Phoenix . ............ . 4%1. 50 0 0 49 0 0 28
Ratcliff ..... ~...... 5/. 100 0 0 90 0 0 -
United General .... - 11. 50 0 0 50 0 0 15%
Westminster Chartered 31. 50 0 0 - 48
Ditto, New •• - -... 12e. 50 0 0 10 0 0 9%
LIST OP SCOTTISIC COMPANIES' PRICES
Dividend Amount
Name of Company. per of Paid. Price.
Annum. Share.
--- -- -
£ s. d. £ a. d
Bank of Scotland ...-. 71. per cent. 100 0 0 100 0 0 17Y
British Linen Company Si. per cent. 100 0 0 100 0 0 mg
Caledonian Bank
City of Glasgow Bank . 61. per cent. 10 0 0 10 0 0 11%
Clydesdale Bank •• •• -6% per cent. 20 0 0 10 0 0 13%
Commercial Rank .• •• 71. per cent. 500 0 0 100 0 0 174%
Eastern Bank •••• •• • • 61. per cent. 25 u 0 10 0 9%
Edinb.&Glasgow Bank 6/. per cent. 5 0 0 5 0 0 4%
Exehangeßnk of Scot 4/. per cent. 100 0 0 50 0 0 12%
Isle of Man. Company 71. per cent. 10 0 0 7 0 0 -
National Bank 6% per cent. 50 0 0 10 f 0 15%
Northof Scotlandßank 4/.percent. 20 0 0 5 0 0 2%
North British Bank •• - - -. _
Royal Bank of Scotland W. per cent. 100 0 0 100 9 0 133
Union Bank of Scotland 111. per cent. 100 0 0 50 0 0 so%
Western Bank.. •• -•• 71. per cent. 50 0 0 50 0 0 73%
Alliance Fire and Life 8%1.pr cent. 10 0 0 10 9 0 20%
B. Accord. Life and Fire - 20 0 0 10 0 -
ilritish Guarantee Ins. 41. per tent. 10 0 0 1 0 0 14J 6d
Caledonian Fire Incur. 101. per cent. 100 0 0 10 0 0 23
Colonial Life ... - 50 0 0 1 00 IL 3s.
City of Glasgow Life 6l. per cent. 25 0 0 2 0 0 21. 171
Edinburgh Life Incur. 61. per cent. 100 0 0 15 0 0 20
East of Scotland Life - 10 0 0 015 0 -
Eng. & Scot. Law Life 51. per cent. 50 0 0 217 6 2%
Hercules Insurance Ce. 71. per cent. 100 0 0 10 0 0 -
Insur. Co. of Scetlnd•• al. per cent. 100 0 0 10 0 0 -
Life Assoc. of Scotland 61. per cent. 10 0 0 1 OAI 11. 185
Mercantile Life - -
National Fire and Life Al. per cent. 10 0 0 1 0 0 21s. 6d
North British Insur. • • 6pr cent. 200 0 0 20 0 0 25%
North & West of Scot. 61. per cent. 10 0 0 1 0 0 -
Scottish Life and Guar. - 20 0 0 011 0 -
Scot. Mas. and Gen. Life - 0 0 015 0 -
Scottish Union Insruce. 6141. pr cent. 20 0 0 1 0 0 241.0 d
Standard Life .• .... •• 51. per cent. 50 0 0 4 5 0 ; 9%
United Dep. Assurance 51. per cent. 10 0. 0 1 0 0 I Iss 9d
MISCELLANEOUS.
Dividend Amount
Name of Company. ' per of Paid, Price.
Annum. Share.
--- ----- --
X. s. d. X. a. d.
knetien Mart .• •••• •• 21. ss. 50 0 0 - 2$
Australian Agriculturl 1/, 100 0 0 30 0 0 15g
kaglo-Mexican Mint.. 11. 10s. 10 0 0 10 0 0 20
Ditto, Half Shares.. _ - 2 10 0 5
Canada ... •......... Gl. per cent. 100 0 0 32 10 0 S 9
Uppr Canada Bonds 51. per cent. - - 94
rity Navigation .... - - - 95
Gen. Revers. & Invest. sp. c.& In, 2/ 100 0 0 'lOO 0 0 90
Equitable Reversionry 5/. pr cent. 100 0 0 100 0 0 106
Gen. Steam Navigation 11.8 s. 15 0 0 14 0 0 27%
London Institution ... ' - - 78 15 0 -
Russell Institution •• .. - - 26 5 0 -
Peninslr & Orient.Stm. 81. per cent. 50 0 0 50 0 0 79
Reversionary Ipt. Soc. 4%1. pr cent. 100 0 0 'lOO 0 0 96
Royal Mail Steam•-• 6/ 18.4. p. c 100 0 0 160 0 0 69
South Australian... - 11. per share. 25 0 0, 25 0 0 -
Van Dieman's Land.. - 100 0 0 , 29 0 0 i }i