The Sun.
London, England, 1850-05-31 00:00:00

to be married to a young lady of property, but
onel"P, then in rather straitened circumstances he induced
rn:tiTe[nPest, the present de'endant, to accept two acco-
f 4tion bills of exchange, one for 301. and the other
r 'OO/. Before these bills arrived at maturity Mr. Guy
tay e
adMittid as an attorney, and last year Mr. Tempest
Rita surprised at receiving a writ, at the suit of Mr. Dud-
Z, " the plaintiff in this action, his friend Mr. Guy's
being
EIIP being endorsed as the attorney for the plaintiffl,.B.;rencpest represented these circumstances to his
ad
vlser, who told him that he could have no de-
oee against Mr. Dodson, the indorsee; and he there-
r.alluwed judgment to pass against him by default.
te eptertiber last he was arrested on a capias ad satis-
itti'ojndum. and sinee then repeated applications had been
Roue to Mr• Guy to disclose who Mr. Dodson was and
an *
re
.(
resided. This information, however,was never
1171'LP:bed; bttt recently Mr. Dodson had been found at
and that gentleman now declares that he
n "vs nothing ( f the hills, nor did he ever give Mr.
helnY, any authority to sue Mr. Tempest upon them, and
• the present application.
Justice WioirrmAti said he could only grant a
4u4 !fi, to allow cause why the judgment should not be set
sinus, in order that the defendant might be placed in a
Lffi'etion to plead to the action ; the facts stated in the
davits on the application against Mr. Guy must be
goyter proceeding.
itule nisi accordingly.
r SWAIN' V. COX.
the • RENTICE applied for a rule to show cause why
CWrit of
tty prohibition, issued in this case out of the
g office of the Court of Chancery, should net
arty• aside. The action bad been commenced in the
Court of Reading for a trespass, but at the hear-
tag of the case the defendant took an objection to the
tl"‘l'diction of the Court, on the ground that the point
how"isPote involved a question of title. No evidence,
a "ever, was adduced to show this, and the Learned
he go overruled the objection, when the defendant said
thwellid leave the matter in the hands of the Court.
oi:,e Court decided against the defendant, and
bat meted, him to pay five pounds as damages ;
w
that
t hen the money became due, it was discovered
j he defendant had caused a writ of prohibition to be
tase,ued out of the Petty Bag office of the Court of Chan-
snl. It had only been recently discovered that this
Zer
„existed in the Chancery Court, and the consequence
eon ',tat in every county court case where property was
sohjeAuLtned, the defendants were obtaining prohibitions
t,'" were issued, as a matter of course, out of the
thE4l3. ag-office. There could, however, be no doubt
by il"its Power of granting prohibition was transferred
el:" County Court Act to the Queen's Bench, who
forereilied
discretion in granting these writ, and
the prohibition in this case ought to bees et aside.there-
mule W.

ARCHES' COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

(Before Sir H. J. FEST, Tint.)
At coatiam V. THE BISHOP OF EXETER.
the sitting of the Court this morning, after several
itlief the ordinary description had been disposed of,
itoode Registrar called the case on, and said this case
De. Aver from the last court day on the application of
Ali ,
.ula who appeared for the Bishop of Exeter, to
olio further time for the return of the monition.
beh ri• ADDAMS rose, and said he was instructed on
fie) of the Bishop of Exeter (the defendant in this
tolik)i to ask that the Court would grant further time for
Prav„ns the return to the monition; and he therefore
eoui.,"l the Court to allow it to stand over to the next
h;;"ay (Monday, June 10). The Bishop of Exeter
desc}i,"flued the Learned' Doctor) bad not the slightest
the et° slight the authority of the Court, or intended
yeast disrespect, in not complying with its order, but
keliaB desirous of obtaining the opinion of Sir Fitzroy
the and Mr. Baddeley, whether after the decision of
Co Judges of the Court of Queen's Bench and Court of
444:"1 Pleas, an application for prohibition should be
l'iss;tO the Court of gxchequer, and which opinion it
Cotip7Peeted. would be obtained during the duy. The
kppC was aware that the question raised by the
spp leation for the prohibition was whether the
RhaLl had been directed to the right Court—
of Per
(Or
1,71' the Queen, by the Judicial Committee
rn7 Council, Lad power to entertain such appeal.
Prea, • • Addams) must repeat, and he begged to im-
deft upon the Court, that the Bishop of Exeter had
theacre to create delay, or at all to slight the order of
o
eirart 114 E
a
alma `,ttERT JENNER FUST—I Call readily under-
") that.
Etei; ADDAIII9—I have no doubt that the Bishop of
hr will receive the opinions of Sir Fitzroy Kelly and
hiouaddeley during tbe day as to the propriety of tip-
g to the Court of Exchequer for a writ of proh!-
4104 on end if no proceedings are taken on those opi-
the „e he (Dr. Addams) would undertake that before
kt4ext court day the return to the monition should be
h
Arr. A BERT JENNER FIIST—AM I to understand
tour,xtidaras that if no proceedings are taken in the
tide t "Exchequer that the order of the Court will be
lied?
r
.A
u • DDANS—Most certainly, Sir.
4'4 TOLLEX (the proctor for the Bishop of Exeter)
14 Proceedings are taken in the Court of Exchequer
make undertake, on the part of the Bishop of Exeter, to
Ibe t' a return to the monition before your surrogate at
srePer time.
Nor IiERBERT JENNER FIIST—What do you say to
/4.lk,,;(addressing Mr. Bo wdler, the proctor for the Rev.
4
Petit] BOWDLER said, after the application that has been
15oe by the Learned Doctor, I do not feel it necessary
i3Pose the motion.
011,ert?liERBERT JENNER FUST—Then you do not
No Sir.
44. "° WDLER— •
ktsipi '"ERBERT JENNER FEST—Very well, let the case
CPVer till the next court day.
Nered to stand over accordingly.

(4,fo'nE'Y SESSIONS.—(THIS DAY.)
A (-.,,r° J• E. JOHNSON, Eq.. and &Bench of Magistrate:.)
Ari4-RAntous ASSAULT ON A CONSTABLE,—WiIIiam
tQitt, '24, for committing a violent assault upon William
he e Pbell, a police•constable of the N division while in
cf his duty, was sentenced to three months'
labbur at Brixton.

kAb
.q.,BRoy-STREET.—(THIS DAY)
L'iOtCllcE OF FRAIID.—Anna Maria Tolfrey, the
11,,,.44 Who was brought up before. Mr. Bingham, on
Of inkBidaY, the 23d inst., charged with obtaining the sum
444 u‘• from Mr. William Richardson, bootmaker, 19,
laatiltrenr, Bishopsgate-street, under false and fraudu-
-1/4 Petences was placed at the bar for further ex-
Inatrio4
14 •
addition to the evidence which appeared at full
nth In
adduced. this journal on the 23d inst., the following was
140
ecti,,,cl Alfred Paget, on being sworn, said he was not
hertnited with the prisoner, neither had he ever seen
*trtlittreeul,,(ll)rye
hiinel.his life. The letter produced was not
°oe' ; 'wen, secretary to the London Trade Protection
170 Regent-street, produced several letters
t he had received from parties who had been duped
tc prisoner.
aoia titeth Crosby, 41, George-street, Blackfriars-road,
frotObout four years ago the prisoner obtained 270/.
hat ner mother. A portion of this sum had since been
lot Zed, and her mother had an I 0 U of the prisoner's
Nir;°l. This was given to her mother about three
j (
ar ar'
rem -won, for the prosecution, said that there were a
""Re,atnitnY more charges against the prisoner, and
tf;-‘,;‘) have her remanded.
'INGHAst remanded her until Wednesday next.

s'4IISOM RACES.

(THIS DAY.-BY EXPRESS.)

tetbe The Innkeepers' Plate.
zurittoo ••• ..• •••
'4l
... 2
skt46tane ••• 3
()"11-CS BETTING UP TO TWO O'CLOCK.

7 to 2 agst Eliza Middleton
9 to 2 agst Tiff
8 to 1 agst Exotic filly
9 to 1 pgat Probity
10 to 1 agst Rhedycina
10 to 1 agst Kathleen
12 to 1 agst Sacrifice
12 to 1 apt Clelia
20 to 1 agst Gillyflower
20 to 1 agst Estafette
kr)o,
kr. '1.(313 THE OAKS.
son's Rhedycina (F. Butler) 1
1)
owneY's Kathleen (A. Day) 2
Gr
ativick's Countess

Won cleverly.
16 ran.

WOLVERHAMPTON
114°11.11::?_1), WORCESTER, AND
4blie 'Y'—The citizens of Worcester,.
ir, it generally, have at length receivedandthethaessturaravnalcleinogf
ktn,,,aril. the chairman of the directors of the above corn-
l'tittl .that means will at once be taken to connect this city
liik,,
."I_e great lines of railway
tit; ',Peet that within a few months t
communication.
he h lie T
betweenheputbhl public
t14%1141 Abbot's Wood will be opened •, andms
nenartnl of thisweare
ty f , will be taken to proceed with the works
giverl?rthWith. 'We sincerely trust that the ledge now
n1i,e313 not of the same frangible nature as the former pro-
uarter.
I'ller ' ga4rantees, and assuranees from the same
dt4 raie are three means by which the company nowlluroptohsee
rat( the necessary capital for the works : by se
t„." ttord.o„_Avon .:
b `aPtia., . , _ canal to thef Birmnitnhgerhaemninapnandieosg;xta-onrdd
~._3' %In .' ? .10y borrowing money rom
'a'nt, P'iling the Great Western to complete its engage-
Illtllti rr 11 e -11 il l s now before Parliament for the two first:
th, felled objects it is understood will not be opposed 1.))
l'llder4ilvaY Board • and with regard to the third point, we
Nitieastanit that the' law officers of the Crown have ter-
Wett,,al3,oll the mode of proceeding against the Great.
liat:etl-tOtra_rnPany, in order to compel performance of its
ilea Q,,`,"gagements in resect of completing the above
b-11, that, in pursuance of that determination, a motion
for Et tetnitle on an early day in the Court of Queen's Bench
tort r1;111nal information against the Great Western three-
sVorcester Chronicle.
;; l'ari, tca 'SOMBRE.—This gentleman, who is now
-,`'R thaiii!l.as memorialised both Houses of Parliament, pray-
'Nio,. itcB examination may be taken before the. close of the
pray-
s illedi
.ii )fibyeeacietesSosimbre has at the same time forwarded
talti:iZsi.eatalwlatilcilietiiiheerhat declar'esgth t he is not at p
ned by five eminent mcdical practi-
resent of unsound
perfecatly competent to manage both his
13 Propetty.