The Sun.
London, England, 1850-07-23 00:00:00

BANKRUY!'S.

Robrrt Day Bust, auctioneer, Reading, to surrender,
July 29, at twelve, and August 30, at one, at the Court
of Bankruptcy. Whitmore, official assignee ; Keighiey,
Basinghsll-street. •
Edward Foster, agricultural machinist, Chesterton,
Cambridgeshire, Aug. 2, at half-past eleven, and Aug.
30, at car, at the Court cf Bankruptcy. Canaan,
official assignee, Birchin-lane, Cornhill; Coles, Adelphi-
terrace, Strand; Fosters, Cambridge.
William Easlam, chemist, Hertford, July 30 and Aug.
31, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Pennell,
aficial assignee, Guildhall-chambers, Basinghall-street;
Thompson and ebenhstm, Salters'-hall, St. Swithin'a-
lane; Longmore and Sworder, Hertford.
William Ward Evans, butcher, Ludlow, Shropshire,
Aug. 2 and Sept. 4, at twelve, at the Birmingham Dis-
trict Court. Christie, official assignee, Birmingham;
Clark, Ludlow; E. and H. Wright, Birmingham.
Edward Round and William Round, timber merchants,
Tipton, Staffordshire, Aug. 10, at ten, and Sept. 17, at
eleseu, at she Birmingham District Court. Whitmore,
official assignee, Birmingham; Coldicott and Canning,
Dudley; Reece, Birmingham.
Ralph Hammond, innkeeper, Macclesfield, Cheshire,
August 9 and 23, at twelve, at the Manchester Dis-
trict Court. Hobson, official assignee, Manchester;
Parrott, Colvil:e, and May, Macclesfield.
John Hayward, scrivener, Hisiand, Shropshire, Aug.
10, and Sept. 17, at 10, at the Birmingham District
Court. Yalu, official assignee, Birmingham; Davies,
Oswestry ; Mu:terms-1, Knight, and Emmett, Birmingham.
Ralph Nuttall, silk manufacturer, Macclesfield, August
8 and 29, at twelve, at the Manchester District Court.
Hobson, cflicial assignee, Manchester; Bennet, Man-
chester; Parrott, Macclesfield.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

(THIS EVENING.)

HOUSE OF LORDS.

The LORD CHANCELLOR took his seat on the Woolsack
shortly after Five o'clock. •
PETITIONS.

Lord PORTMAN presented a. petition from the in-
habitants of Camberwell complaining of the incompe-
tency of the Commissioners of Sewers, in consequence of
which they suffered grievously.
The Earl of EGLINTON presented a petition from a
solicitor of Liverpool, praying to be heard by counsel
before the Committee on the forgery of signatures to
the petition against the Liverpool Waterworks Bill.
Lord WIIARNCLIFFE presented several petitions
in favour of the Marriage Bill.
The Earl of LONSDALE presented several petitions
against beer shops.
Lord STANLEY presented several petitions in favour
of protection— also a petition against the Marriages
Act.
Lord REDESDALE presented several petitions from
various bodies of clergy with a similar prayer.
The Bishop of OXFORD presented some petitions
with a similar prayer.
The Marquis of LANSDOWNE presented a petition
from the mayor, aldermen, and burgesses of Deal, com-
plaining of the great inconvenience which had arisen
from the abolition of the Sunday Pest-office delivery, and
praying for the immediate restoration of it.
MARRIAGE BILL

The Earl of ST. GERMANS, iti answer to a question
of Lc rd Stanley, said he had not had an opportunity of
consulting the promoters of the Bill, but be would give
an answer on Thursday.
The Marquis of BREADALBANE honed the Bill
would not be persevered in, or at all events that it would
not be made applicable to Scotland, from which country
he presented several petitions against ir.
COURT OF CHANCERY (IRELAND).

Lordln an answer tou Gli
a question
AS his intention to
proceed with this Bill, which stood for a third reading.
i saidtrot that
Lt
PROVISION FOR THE DUKE OF CAMBRID4
On the motion of the Marquis of LANSDOWNE her
Majesty's message was read.
The NOBLE MARQUIS then rose to move that a
humble address be presented to her Majesty, to return
her thanks fur her gracious message, to assure her that
the House would adopt all mr asures that might be ne-
et sse.ry to provide for the faint!), of the Duke of Cam-
bridge. The Noble Marquis then explained the pro-
visions of the Bill at prrsf_nt before the other House for
[nuking provision for the family of the late Duke of
Cambridge.

Lord iiROZIGHAM would say, as he had said in the
other House, that eo long as a most iniquitous and im-
politic law disgraced their Btatute•book, by which the
members of the Royal Family were prevented from con-
tr:)cing marriages with whom they liked, it aas the
duty or the country to provide amply for them.
The motion vsaa then agreed t( .
The Earl of ULENGALL presented a petition from
the landowners of a district in Tipperary complaining of
the low price of flour
(LEFT , and was
SPEAKING.)