The Sun.
London, England, 1850-06-28 00:00:00

DURING DEBATES.

The Marquis of LANSDO WNE moved the consider-
ation of the report of the Committee upon the above sub-
ject. In doing so, he said it was unnecessary for him
to recapitulate all the arguments which had been used
on a former occasion on that subject. The Committee
had reported that another gallery be added near the
strangers' gallery to that of the peers, for the accommo-
dation of such personages. Although it was the wish to
afford every accommodation possible, it was necessary
that the Houss should retain in its own hands the power
of making such regulations as it thought fit. The pro-
posed arrangement was, therefore, entered into until
other arrangements might be made. _ _ _

The Duke of WELLINGTON concurred in the ob-
servations of the Noble Marquis that the House ought to
retain in its own hands the power of regulating its own
standing orders.
The report was, after a short conversation, understood
to be agreed to, to theeffect that the lower end of the peers'
gallery was to be added to a portion of the strangers'
gallery, to afford accommodation to the members of the
diplomatic corps.
Some Bills on the table were then advanced a stage.
CRIME AND OUTRAGES (IRELAND) BILL.
The Marquis of LANSDOWNE, on moving the third
reading of the Crime and Outrages (Ireland) Bill, ob-
served that his Noble Friend the Lord-Lieutenant of
Ireland had said that if he had such a measure as that
to administer he could dispense with the Arms Bill
altogether.
Their Lordships then adjourned, at Ten minutes past
Eight o'clock.

HOUSE OF COMMONS, June 27.
The SPEAKER took the Chair at Four o'clock.
THIRD READINGS, &c.
The following Bills were read a third time and passed:
Prussian Minister's Residence.

Timber Preserving Company.
The following Bills, as amended, were considered and
agreed to :
Nlarylebone and Finchley Turnpike Roads.
Rochdale, through Bamford and Birtic to Bury, and
other Turnpike Roads.
The Manchester Bonding Bill was read a second time.
_ PETITIONS.

Sir R. 11. INGLIS presented a petition against the
admission of Jows into Parliament.

Similar petitions were presented by Sir C. Burrell,
Mr. Christopher, Mr. R. Palmer, and several other Hon.
Members.

Mr. PRIME presented a petition from Arundel com-
plaining of the alterations in the Post-office.
Mr. J. REYNOLDS presented a petition from Dublin
against ministers' money.
Mr. DUNCAN presented a petition from Forfarshire
praying for a drawback upon bonded spirits.
Sir D. NORREYS presented a similar petition from
Malton.

Mr. S. WORTLEY presented several petitions from
different parts of the metropolis in favour of the Mar-
riage Bill.

Mr. PACKE presented a petition from Hinckley
against certain clauses in the Savings Bank Bill.
Mr. M. GIBSON presented eight petitions from Man-
chester in favour of the Marriage Bill.
um_ PROPOSED ERECTION IN HYDE.PARK.

Sir H. WILLOUGHBY gave notice of a motion for
Monday next with respect to the right of the Commis•
sioners of Woods and Forests to erect a building in
Hyde-park for the Exhibition of 1851.
Sir DE LACY EVANS gave notice that to-morrow
he would put a question to the First Commissioner of
Woods and Forests on the same subject.
Mr. T. DUNCOMBE gave notice that on Monday
next he would ask the first Lord of the Treasury when
the intended Exhibition of 1851 would close; also whether
it was not advisable that the Commissioners of Woods and
Forests should reconsider their determination to erect the
building in Hyde-park, and whether, in the event of
the amount raised, or to be raised, by voluntary
subscription being insufficient, it was in the contem-
plation of her Majesty's Ministers to ask Parlia-
ment, either this year or next, for a grant of public
money to defray the expenditure which would be in-
curred.—(Hear, hear, and cheers from the Protectionist
benches.)

Mr. ROEBUCK wished to know from the Noble
Lord (Lord J. Russell) whether, in the event of the
building being erected in Hyde-park, there was any
stipulation that it was to be pulled down ?—(Hear.)
Lord J. RUSSELL said, as the Hon. Member for
Finsbury had given notice of a question on the same
subject for Monday next, he would rather defer giving
an answer to the Hon. and Learned Gentleman's ques-
tion until that day.
Mr. HUME wished to know if Government would
guarantee that there should be no expense incurred ou
the part of the public?
Mr. LABOUCHERE said it should be distinctly un-
derstood that Government had nothing whatever to
do with the expense of the exhibition, which was alto-
gether a private speculation. Government had nothing
whatever to do with it.

Mr. ROEBUCK asked the Right llon. Gentleman
whether he would sanction any application to Parlia-
ment next year for a grant to assist the undertaking,
supposing tho Right lion. Baronet should then be in
office?

Mr. LABOUCHERE declined to give any pledge of
that sort, but he could positively state that he had no
apprehension of any such vote being asked for.—(oh!)
Mr. ROEBUCK considering this answer unsatisfac-
tory, gave notice that on the earliest possible day, he
should take the sense of the House upon the propriety
of destroying the parks.