The Sun.
London, England, 1868-06-18 00:00:00

THE CIVIL SERVICE BILL.

Our readers are aware of the deep interest we
take in this subject, which we regard as one of the
greatest importance to the United States. It is
simply impossible to attempt any reforthation in the
political corruption so strongly condemned by the
Chicago Convention before the Civil Service of the
country has been wholly remodelled. What folly
it is to put the greatest temptations in the way of the
needy, and then to bewail the prevalence of theft.
Mr. Jenckes's Bill has been frequently alluded to by
us, and we cannot. do better than to reproduce the
article which appeared in the New York Nation,
May 28, on the subject..
Taking advantage of the comparative lull in the
ordinary business of legislation, Mr. Jenekes, on
Thursday week, May 14, introduced his bill to re-
gulate the Civil Service of the United States. He
reported it from the Joint Select Committee on
Retrenchment, and he supported it by a speech
which was reported in the telegraphic summary as
having occupied an hour, but not one word of its
contents or of the scheme of the bill was.given.

The plan is substantially that of Mr. Jenckes's ori-
ginal bill on this subject. It creates a department
of the Civil Service, to be presided over by the
Vice-President, with a board of four commissioners,
to be appointed for five years. Their duties are,
first, to prescribe the qualifications requisite for an
appointment into each branch and grade of the Civil
Service; next, to provide for the examinations, and
periods, and conditions of probation of all persons
eligible and presenting themselves for Omission into
the Civil Service ; third, to establish rules for appli-
cations, examinations, and appointments ; and,
finally, to examine personally, or by persons by
them specially designated, the applicants for ap-
pointment into the Civil Service of the United
States. The Act then goes on to provide for the
order and manner in which appointments to the
Civil Service shall be made from those who have
passed the prescribed examination and probation.
The proposed law is clear and simple, short and
to the purpose, free from preambles and provisos,
and it is so plain that he who runs for office must
hereafter read it and understand it. The army of
office holders now in place, and of their prospective
successors, must look upon it as their shibboleth,
I and learn from it how to live and die in office. Of
the greatness of the task which he has undertaken
Mr. Jenckes shows a thorough comprehension. He
proposes utterly to destroy the great American
curse of party patronage. He says, on the eve of a
Presidential election, that it is for the interest of
the country to pass a law which will forbid the re-
moval of fifty thousand officials as the result of a
change in the political complexion of the Govern-
ment. Not content with a theoretical discussion
of the merits of a permanent civil service, Mr.
Jenckes tells us that he has taken the testimony of
the greater number of the chief officers in the ex-
isting civil service, and he gives us the result. The
Committee on Retrenchment have received reports
from 446 officers confirmed by the Senate, in all
branches of the civil service, whose subordinates
within the operation of this Act number 12,819,
and of these officers 362, having 11,561. subordi-
nates, express themselves decidedly in favour of the
proposed reform. Of the residue 12 officers, having
143 subordinates, express a decided opposition to
it, and the remainder either do not answer the
vital questions at all, or answer them evasively.
With such facts, plainly and tersely put, as they
are in this speech of Mr. Jenckes, it is easier to
find forcible arguments in support of the measure
than to educe them from our general and theoreti-
cal belief in its efficiency. What are the substan-
tial rewards which Mr. Jenckes promises for the
fruits of his bill if it be made law? Double the
amount of the present service at two-thirds of the
present cost; a saving in the expense of the collec-
tion of the revenues of one-half the fifteen millions
which it now takes ; and, finally, an addition of
revenue from the subjects of taxation proposed to
he retained by the Committee of Ways end Means
of fifty millions in the internal revenue and twenty-
five millions in the customs. In short, the country
will be richer by a hundred millioes every year if
it adopt a law which will do more to elevate the
politics of the country from the great Serbonian bog
in which it is now bedraggled and bemired, more to
make statesmen of our politicians, financiers and
economists of our revenue officials, more to save
the people from corruption, more to preserve the
Government from mischief, more to renew, and re-
store, and sustain the virtues of the Republic than
all the legislation of the last decade.

With a Constitution purified from slavery, with
a Government under it that has undergone the
throes of civil war, of dissensions between its co-
ordinate branches, and with a people honestly and
heartily in earnest to maintain both the Government
and the Constitution, there is still a vice in the
administration of the laws which almost palsies
them. This mischief lies in the shifting, changing,
uncertain, and gradually decaying condition of our
civil service. Up to the breaking out of the re-
bellion it mattered little how the officers of the
United States exercised their . functions, for the
Government was seen rather than felt, it was an
idea rather than a fact. All this changed with the
rebellion, with the enormous efforts of the Govern-
ment to maintain itself, with the burdens put on
the people by the success of these efforts, and with
the taxes and the vast addition of revenue and out-

lay that were then voluntarily, assumed. The task
of adjusting these burdens to our capacity, to make
sources of national income without destroying
national wealth, has tested the fitness of our
political system to do this work. In any other
coun4-ry than our own, with its youth, its wealth,
its vigour, its unlimited expanse of territory, its
growing tide of emigration, the Government would
have broken down. That it will not do so now
may call forth all our gratitude. That it may be
strengthened and fitted for the work that it has yet
to do, in developing the power and capacity of the
country in industrial and in other directions, there
must be a reform in that one thing which has
hitherto been the pitfall of every political party,
and the blighting curse of the young men who be-
longed to one or other of the great armies of our
Government by parties. This reform is, as we be-
lieve, effected by Mr. Jenckes's bill—at least it is
aimed at; and as tentative legislation has been the
best thing that we could get in other matters, so it
may be the best, or in the end it may. secure us that
which is beat, in our civil service.

As we have remarked ebewhere, every party and
every politician is ready enough to denounce cor-
ruption iu the abstract. Nobody will ever have the
hardihood to get up and defend the appointment of
dishonest men to public offices, or the practice of
Chain tho QMPUIAIts TWO Vta Wet bo a

party avowedly and notoriously held together by
" the cohesive power.of public plunder," and which
it will be sufficient to turn out of office in order
to secure purity and efficiency. Therefore,
when a party passes resolutions against cor-
ruption in general, as the Republican party
has just been doing, it merely fires blank
cartridge. It makes a fine, exhilarating noise, but
it does not hurt or frighten the knaves. Under
the present system no party can be honest, because
no party can change human nature. Therefore,
the public ought not to be, and we trust will not
be, content any longer with vague denunciations
of fraud. It ought to demand practical measures
of reform, set down in black and white. It ought
not any longer to put up with windy abuse of
Andrew Johnson or of the Copperheads. In this
kind of work no knave ever is, or ever will be,
found wanting.
This bill of Mr. Jenekes's we hold to be the first
and gre ttcst of the measures of reform now before
the country--the one on which most is dependent
not simply of money, but of public and private
morality. He has worked long and hard at it,
and it is a kind of work with which the regular
party managers have, as a rule, little sympathy.
He is not likely, we fear, to succeed without active
and outspoken support from the public, and we
trust he will receive it without stint, in season and
out of season, especially from that large class of
young men who are now interesting themselves in
politics, under the influence of the wider knowledge
and higher aspirations which the war has bred,
We trust, too, that he will be of good cheer. If
political progress consist, as we believe it does, in
the greater and greater subjection of human affairs
to the control of enlightened reason, the future be-
longs to him, and to such as he, and not to the
windy declaimers who, while holding the great
horn of humanity with one hand and blowing it
lustily, generally hold with the other a leash of
hungry peculators, to be let loose at every conve-
nient opportunity on the unfortunate tax-payer.-
4nglo-American Times.

THE SU ORD OF THE LATE LORD
NELSON.

----o-- -

On Monday Mr. Coo Per, banister, accompanied
by ..Mr. Thomas Evans, of 27, Queen-street,
Brompton, attended before the Lord Mayor, at the
Mansion house, Mr. Evans's object being to
make an affidavit in reference to a relic of Lord
Nelson. In that document Mr. Evans deposed in
effect, that, declining in years, he was most
anxious to set himself right with the public with
respect to the dress sword of Lord Nelson, which
he had ever implicity believed to be a most in-
teresting relic of the great hero, and which, in or
about 1816, was presented by Lord Saye and
Sele to the Governors of Groenwich Hospital, with
a view to its being placed with the celebrated coat
and waistcoat there deposited. This the Governors
had declined to do, under an impression which the
deponent trusted to be able to show was entirely
erroneous. lie also desired to remove the prejudice
that the identity of the sword was doubtful, to
enlighten the public mind with respect to it, and
to show how he became possessed of it. He solemnly
and sincerely declared that ho obtained the sword
from the same lady froin whom Sir Harry
Nicholas procured the coat and waistcoat, in
the purchase of which the deponent was
forestalled. That lady was Mrs. Smith, who
was the wife of Mr. Joshua Jonathan Smith, Lord
Mayor of London in 1810, who declared to witness
that her husband obtained possession of the vest-
ments referred to with the sword, which was then
covered with crape, which time and moths had
partly destroyed. The relic, she said, had been given
to her husband by the celebrated Lady Hamilton, who
had been informed the sword was taken off Lord
Nelson's coffin. In the affidavit sworn yesterday be-
fore the Lord Mayor a copy of a letter written by
Wm. Ashby, apensioner at Greenwich Hospital, was
embodied. That letter was dated Nov. 13, 1846,
and in it Mr. Ashby certified that the sword which
Mr. Evans purchased was the one which, with vari-
ous other honours, was placed on the coffin contain-
ing the body of Lord Nelson, when the remains lay
in state in the Painted Hail of Greenwich Hospital
for three days, and that he was informed Nel-
son wore the same sword on the day he received
his mortal wound. To the identity of the
sword Ashby spoke positively, having had it with
the other insignia under his immediate charge for
three successive days, he being then in his capacity
of boatswain of the Palliser Ward of the hospital,
chief of a special guard appointed with ex-
press orders to prevent the removal, or the public
touch, of any of the relics. This letter was ad-
dressed to Mr. Evans, the deponent, at his then
residence, No. 17, Maddox-street. Mr. Evans also
solemnly deposed that from the time the sword came
into his possession up to his disposal of it, nothing
whatever bad been done to it beyond being simply
cleaned, in which operation the workman so en-
gaged transposed the hilt, which at any time could
be easily rectified. The affidavit, of which this is
the purport, was made before the Lord Mayor, who
thereupon appended bis name to it.

111ISCELLANEOUS _NEWS.

(From the Anglo-American Tim u.)

The Round Tuble, in reviewing the life of Jeffer-
son Davis, by Frank H. Alfriend, late editor of the Southern
Literary Messenger, thus compares the great Northern
General with his great Southern adversary :—" The
lengthy comparison instituted between General Grant
and General Lee by the author is not just to the
former, and perhaps could scarcely bo expected to
b i so. Grant has certainly not Lie's versatility, his
resource, his doh, and very few of his imaginative
qualities, but he was . pre-eminently the man for the
situation. Ile is a limited-mint 4 stony-willed, in-
flexible soldier of the grinding school, with very little
idea of chivalry, but a very definite idea of accom-
plishing what he undertakes. Of course, he dad more
man than Lee in the final campaign; it would have been
rather absurd to undertake the business with less. The
movement was an offensive, an invasive one, contemplat-
ing no less than the encircling and capture of the whole
opposing force; a climax which the evacuation of Rich-
mond only evaded in one way to bring about in another.
Mr. Alfriend has a great many passages like this :—" The
world was invited by the sensational press of the North
to admire I he 'strategy' which had carried the Federal army
from the Rapidan to the James, a position which it might
have reached by transports without the loss of a man."
Possibly, but with what damage to General Lee's army ?
The critic's implication would be sound enough if Rich-
mond and not Lee's army had been the true "'objective
point" at which 'to strike: Grant's losses, doubtless, were
great, but his policy, once in Lee's presence, was clearly
never to quit him. The Federal resources bore such a
relation to those of the Confederates that the " hammer-
ing" process was the best that could be adopted. The
battles of the Wilderness may not have been victories for
Grant,,bat they were not less practically the knell of the
Confederate cause. There was no getting away afterward
to attempt brilliant strokes whereby disparity in numbers
might be counterbalanced. The rest was all wary watch-
ing and hard pounding. The difference between Grant
and - other Federal commanders—judging, of course, by
their respective achievements—was that he went clear
through his task to the end. Another general would have
retreated, another have attempted something dazzling and
failed, another have permitted himself to be surprised.
Grant did none of these things. lie is, so far as humanity
can be so, as impassive as destiny ; the consummate em-
boditneut, in a military sense, of hard, pitiless, unimagina-
tive resolution ; a man of iron, but iron without magne-
tism. Lee, we may admit, is a more knightly and gra-
cious figure than Grant, a man more capable of evoking
enthusiasm, a man more like the heroic models of his-
tory.; but, after all, the simple fact is that Grant never
failed, but quietly and thoroughly did whatever he at-
tempted. It is no disparagement to General Lee to say
that, placed in the same situation, ho could not have done
more and might have done less."
The Spectator condescended to defend itself, and
lamely we admit against the flaunting of the Standard
on the prediction it so confidently hazarded that the Pre-
sident would be convicted and deposed. - The Spectator's
reply amounted to littlo more than that the Standard's article
was a " belated" ono. A result which ' deceived alike
Andrew Johnson, the prosecuted, as well as Butler and
Stevens, the prosecutors; which .was regarded as a cer-
tainty by Wade, the " heir apparent," and a host of those
keen-scented individuals, the professional office-seekers of
Washington—might well deceive the best informed
writers in Europe. In fact people were deceived iti pro-
portion to their information up to within two or three
days of the event, and no one appeared more contideLt
that " the national crime," as he termed it would be com-
mitted of deposing Andrew Johnson, than th,s Washing-
ton correspondent of the Standard itself. That the
Sp:War slarecii tad cmaitictioa wow 6 Foci of Up

„,c5
knowledge than of its ignorance of American poi”'
But it is not the Standard only that twits the Spectator on
the result. This is what the Round Table says: —"ng(i
lisp comments upon American politics are always re'
with interest in this country, particularly when they 0
from journalists who have made a special study of oli!
affairs. They are nut, perhaps, read so much with 3 vies
to instruction—although that is often to be obtained fr°:9l
them—as from curiosity to see what intelligent and Cullf
vated observers of our own race, looking at us from witht
may bo moved to say Mistakes are frequently rel"l3
these observers, and that, of course, gratifies us in proper'
tion to the average culture and sincerity of the blunderer
The Spectator of May 9 announces the conviction of Prost'
dent Johnson as "certain, of course,"—an example is
point. The Saturday Review repeatedly insists up'n thecertainty of the election to the Presidency of Genera
Grant ; we may possioly, in November, b 3 able to ea3ke,.
the same reply which we now forbear in the case of tse
Spectator." The Rowed Table forgets that, the Piir„rst
published in England mainly derive their information al'''.
Arno. ica from the papers published in America, and th:
opinions of the Round Table may have influenced those s'el'
journals in forming the notions on which it comments
,t
Suppose now that the Saturday Review had read the
article in the number of May 3J, from which we obtaige
this extract, headed " The Chicago Convention," aa'l,init;
pressed with the following words, had allowed them
_ii
create au idea to which it afterwards gave utterance, wc'"
the American paper be justified in commenting ou the OW
der of the English one ? " To the impartial observer thel
appears, therefore, at this moment no doubt whatever ih3t,R
tae present ostensible accord of tha different branches ef t"i
Republican party can be maintained for five months, "d,,,1
they cau be brought compactly to bear in November, the
election of their candidates (Grint and Colfax) is 3 eel'
tainty. The collective strength of those branches is III„"'
deniable ; their cordial unanimity is, for the time,
so ; and their triumph can only be preventod by P°l:
divisions which their leaders may or may not have

sagacity to avert."
Judy does not approve of the Tomahawk's Ft e
tures, and expresses how deeply she was shocked PI t"iti
representation of Satan driving a nob'eman to the inferlin
regions; and a sign-post with "To 11-11" inscribed 11P%
it, relieving the mind of all doubts as to the true rneavili:"
of the drawing. "The following week, in the same paPelid
says Judy, appeared a representation of Satan in his peols,
regions, with flames and all, according to the received ides
his Majesty and his surroundings. in an embryo PaPe,,,C
of the same class, which is just old enough to catch the li"
of licentiousness, the eye is refreshed by the sight els
poem entitled ' A Gallows Shame !!' In both of WI
papers, Royalty, the Church, and the State are ridiculed 0
libelled on every possible occasion. A third publicatioa
has selected the army for its attacks, and a criminal iW
not
mation against it has been applied for by the colonel ac't
officers of a regiment of dragoons. Whether or
such publications are subsidized by the Radical Pali;
remains a mystery, but if they obtain a large and geau:o
support from the public generally, the matter is still 111(''t
serious. Judy fears that there is really quite a taste at
the present time for scurrility, and she is confirmed in
this conclusion by a little incident which occurred to h)l.-
self, and which she will relate. Conversing with aPI
friend, whose mind is much misguided by the Radic
influences of the time, Judy, of course, quietly floV
her young adversary on every point of argument. tkfie
subject of newspaper influence was reached, and the ('-;
cussion waxed strong. Judy continued to put the rtip:
gentleman (metaphorically) on his back ; but, at last, 67;
Awns, she was put. completely hors de combat heree'r
Speaking of a certain journal, Judy remarked, is a sell
rilous paper, and you can't deny it.' I like a scarrilow,
paper' (!!), thunderedjuvenis ; and Judy said not another
word, but went home a sadder and a wiser woman' e
A curious account is given in the Providenc
Journal of a Bible printed in the language of the Massacbtv,
setts_ Indians, and all accomplished by one man knout`'
the Apostle John Eliot, who laboured as a missiaO'.
among the Indians for a long period. He was many 941:
engaged in the labour of translation. It is at all tint o
task of great difficulty to render the Bible into a fer'li,
language, even if the language is a written one ; b dr
such a language as that of the Indians, which was Utif
before written, the labour was gigantic. None but a ii
ginus enthusiast, such as Eliot, would ever have atteMPtl ,
it. This Bible has also a value as a typographical carl°r,
city. In the year 1663 New England was still a wildiebe
ness teeming with a groat Indian population, and the
struggle for existence was by no means an easy one. 410
print a pamphlet was an event of importance, yet to 1
infancy of the commonwealth the whole Bible was printo:l
Cambridge in this strangelanguage,a monumentof aborigill;
philology which has never been equalled, notwithstsedi
all the efforts of our missionary societies to Christiania,
and civilize the Indians for the last 200 years. The printi.,ll36
of this Bible was begun in 1660, and finished in Sept
ber, 1663, thus occupying three years. The edition w'r
1,000 copies, of which not more than 15 are known to be Pro
served in the United States. Twenty copies were seat,
England, in which there was a dedication to Charles i".,
Second. But this is not all that is remarkable about till'
Bible. A second edition was called for, and the
work was reprinted at Cambridge by Samuel Greene,
printer of the first edition, in 1635. The art of prilitt
was still in its infancy. Tho proposition for printing' t-a
edition was submitted to the commissioners of the ueitel
colonies of New England for their consideration in 1678-i
by Mr. Eliot, who, among his several appeals, said try,
King Philip had sent to him for books to read. The w°fri
which was commenced the following year, proceeded b 6,
slowly, as there was but one man, the Indian printer, sllbia
was able to compose the sheets and correct the proof.
1634, Mr. Eliot. writing to the Hon. Robert Boyle, sa93',
"Wo have but few hands, one Englishman and a ii;
and one Indian." It was completed the following Seal,
and 2,000 copies printed. The Indian title reads as f's
fows :—" Mamusse wunnetupanatamwe up-Biblura
Cer
naneeswe Nukkone Testament kuk wonk waska
Lament," &c. The following is the full Diets,' •
title :—" The Holy Bible : containing the old Tes-„,
ment and the New. Translated into the Indian
guage, and ordered to be printed by the Coeolo
sioners of the United Colonies in New England. t
charge and with the consent of the Corporation in-r.',13."e
;
land for the Propagation of the Gospel among the Indi-,
in New England. Cambridge ; Printed by Samuel Gree:o
and Marmaduko Johnson, MDCLXIII. (1663), 4to.
leaves." Tho New Testament contains 129 leaves.
r.lotd

well known that there is no Indian living who can
this Bible or even speak the language in which it is Oto
ten. The Hon. J. Hammond Trumbull, of Hartford, li'ho
Secretary of the State of Connecticut, is, we believe,
cl
only person living who understands the language till. 05
able to read this Bible. Ho has made it a study for 103,3 a
years, and has composed a dictionary of several thouloct
words from it. We are glad to learn that fine and per 01
copies of both editions of Eliot'sßible and New Testeri
are in a private library in Providence, in which alTha
little volume in the same ludiaa language, ca'le I
Practice of Piety," and "Grammar of the Indian Piof
guage," printed at Cambridge in 1666, both the sycirro,
the indefatigable Eliot. The gramintir is far more 0.0
than the Bible. as not more than three copies are
in the United States.

91
[ADVERTISEMENT.]—Consumption, and all nervous, ,1110,10,1
stomach and liver complaints in every stage are only aggrslote
and accelerated by drugs of every description, but Pervoo:,i
curable by Du Barry's health-restoring Revalenta Arabics,
as proved by thousands of cases which had been conswl
80f
hopeless; such as indigestion (dyspepsia), cough, asthals,foge
sumption, habitual constipation, diarrhoea, all gastric der 00
ments, haemorrhoids, liver complaints, flatulency, nervouss, is
biliousness, fevers, sore throats, diphtheria, catarrhs, eeldirpfl
fluenza, noises in the head and ears, rheumatism, gout, 00'
titles, eruptions, hysteria, neuralgia, irritability, aleeple_,oo/01.:
acidity, palpitation, heartburn, headache, debility, 'lra
cramps, spasms, nausea and sickness, even in pregnancy,,lloo"
sea, sinking fits, bronchitis, scrofula, tightness of the • pains at the pit of the stomach, and between the should
We quote a few.—The Pope's health restored by Du 13501
Food. Cure No 63,413.—" Rome, July 21, 1866.—The he?'e
tha Holy Father is excellent, especially since, abandonel.64
other remedies, he has confined himself entirely to Du P,'",,te
Revalenta Arabica Food, of which he consumes u P'eaci,
at every meal. It has prolneed a surprisingly he tly"..
effect on his health, and his Holiness cannot prais!:4,
excellent food too highly." From the " Gazette du liter
July 25. Cure No. 46,270. Mr. James Roberts, timber 00
chant, ,of Frimley, Surrey, of -thirty years' diseased •,n0,,;
spitting of blood, liver derangemgnt, and partial deafun 0,
Cure No. 1,771. Lord Stuart de Decies, Lord Lieutennof
Waterford, of many years' dyspepsia.,--No. 49,832.
years' indescribable agony from dyspepsia, nervos_ 00.1
asthma, cough, constipation, flatulency, spasms, sickne
vomiting.—MariaJoly." Important Caution.—Beware of the Ttioa
unsavoury and more than sloppy imitations to which, 0, ,
authority, Baron Liebig's name is most audaciously attach 115•:
In tins, at Is. 1 d.; 1 lb. 2s. 9d ; 2 lbs., 4s 6d ; 5 11140,
12 lbs , 225. • 24 lbs , 40s —:BARRY DU BARRY and CO gfel
Regent-street, London; also Fortnum and Mason, 1874 1
dilly, and at 61, Gracechurch-street ; 4, Cheapside; 63.
298, Oxford-street; 330, Strand; and all grocers and cheuP___

Births.
OOLD—On the 15th inst., at 22, Nottingham-plece'r,
gent's-park, the wife of C. Gold, Esq., of a daughte
EAST—On the 12th inst., at Rodwell, Weymouth, the '
of Commander James East, R.N., of a daughter. V(4
MILLAIs—On the 15th inst., at 7, Cromwell-plaeeltA.
the wife of John E. Millais, Esq., R.A., of a daugu

Marriages. ~ 16:
WATSON—CANNON—On the 16th inst., at St. Mary ',Zoo.
lington, Robert Henry Watson, Esq., of Malvell's4l4
Dalston, to Helen, eldest daughter of C. Cannel),
of Crowlaud-terrace, Islii.gton. 01'
sto
WINGFIELD FITZ PATRICK—On the 16th inst.,, eof
George's, Hanover-square, the Hon. Lewis S. Wineli.'
to Cecilia Emily Emma, daughter of the Right P."
W. Fitz Patrick, M.P.

Deaths. 040,
FORTH—On the 30th April, at Lima, in South Arliv-oit,Al"
Viscountess Forth, widow of the late Viscount,
e), le
and wife of E. C. Dering, Esq., eldest son of Sir Ps'
Dering, M.P.
0
r
HARDINGOn the 15th inst., at Bole Hall, Taiuw°-
Harding, Esq., aged 85. ~tot#
flawmxs—On the 15th inst., at 4, g
Vi o-street, lievha
W street, Mr. in. A. Hawkins, aged 66.
of T.'
Hort:vox—On the 16th inst., Edward Hornor, Esq.,

Howe, Halstead, Essex, aged 57.
pi lir., V
MEWBUItN—On the 15th inst., at Wandsworth, -•
Mewburn, Esq., aged 33. Ye'
WARMINGTON —Oa the 16th inst., at Lee-terrace,

- - -
Kue , Joseph `Var►uington, Esq., aged 78,

--- --
~,-00 9.
London : Printed and Published by Wazux Als.-a- °
1',4
of No. 112, Strand, Printor, at THE Surf 01ic.2. `'.,,:i
Strand, in the Precinct of the Se voy, in the Co'

kliddlosoz.--Ilanday, Jae Ufa

rho can
ich it is vir':o
lartforJ, lt7a
5 belie" °' a j,;
Vag° 107,11,
udy for 11);`,j''ci
3ral thou' fact
to and per pi
'w 'l.'estaw-
which also a
() call 1 ";-;,
Indian -10 i
h the Nvcs..,tro
far nin'e 01
es and 10°

ervous,
mlyaggr4rectui
L, but Perfoou'
een consl coo'
as thols, obe
istric d°rl3,o
7, nervotl-5
rrhe, co pa
m, gout, '0650
ateeplqsnoi:
regnaneY ° r o
'
Doh
3 of the
shouldereid.
by De 13111 CI
—The he, t P"
tbaudo.ei.d.ol
to Do
nes a Pl'tgcji'l
ugly be n° tilt
lot pritts.e\ioj,
etto du
3, timber .4,5,
liseased lust
ial deaftiest
Lieutenax,oo
i5,552;,00,,e0
d
stileknes'
rare of the Pt'lloo
which, /P t ,
attachxsly 715..
id * 5
tnd CO
won, 182, es
le; 63.1(:t,
and

Pg'
am-pi, a-„ -'r,
a daughte
lon tb, the s'
ighter.
11-place,
a daugbfr

St. MarYi'io'd''
]rp
Malvercp
canuon,
L inst., a.t
flel"
is S.
) Eight

ortth Aneolri'rA
't'
rf
"iscoundfr
. of Sir

TquiWOrti, " C'

itreet, Beb-
)r, E sq., Of 4

rortb, S.IV4

ijcei
e-terrace,

,x Aisne
the o°-