The Sun.
London, England, 1858-06-12 00:00:00

MR. CECIL MOORE.

Mr, J. FITZGERALD asked the Attorney General
for Irelaad, whether Mr. Cecil Moore, who had been
recently appointed Sessional Crown Prosecutor for the
county of Tyrone, was tl.e same Mr. Cecil Moore de-
scribed in the appendix to the report on the Belfast
Riots, p. 289, as Cecil Moore, of Cotta;,e Aui4h-
naclony, Grand Secretary of the Tyrone Orange Lodge?
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL for IRELAND said
the person lately appointed was the same person referred
to in the question. The appointment wat made on the
recommendation of the two members for the county,
and the assistant barrister for the district. (Hear )
LADIES' GALLERY.
Mr. EDWARDS asked the Chief Commissioner of
Works, if thtra was any objection to an increase of
accommodation in the Ladies' Gallery ?
Lord J. MANNERS said he had made inquiries
into the subjct. He had no objection to make an
experiment as recommended, and, if it answered, to
further extend it.
OFFICERS' SOLDIER-SERVANTS.

General CODRINGTON asked the Secretary of
State for War, whether the warrant of 1857, relating to
Officers' Soldier• Servants was or was not cancelled ; and,
if not, whether it was still con-idtred that the sum of
ls. a-day in England, and 1-i. 6..1. a.day abroad wai a
sufficient sum to pay for a civilian servant ?
General PEEL said the war circular referred to had
been cancelled. (Hear, hear.)

CHATIIAn BARRACKS.

In reply to a question,

Gen. PEEL said he had received no official report re-
lative to the scarcity of water at Chatham Barracks. His
'Attention had been called to the subject by a paragraph
he had seen in the public papers, and he had sent down
an officer to make inquiry end report thereon. (Hear.)
INDIA.—LORD CANNING'S PROCLAMATION.
'On the motion for adjournment till Monday,
Mr. WILSON asked the President of the Board of
Control whether any distinct information had been re-
ceived that Lord Canning's Proclamation Lad been
issued at Lucknow, and of the result which bad been
produced upon the talookdars in their relation to the
British Government.
Lord STANLEY took the opportunity of correcting
a slight mistake he made yesterday. He was
yesterday a.,ked if any official document had been re-
ceived by the last mail relative to the pacification of
Oude, and whether he saw the notice on the paper—he
caused enquiry to be made in his department, at d he
received a positive assurance that nothing official had
been received on the subject. After be had given his
answer yesterday to the question, he was informed tfeet
at the bottom of a miscellaneous despatch there was a
paragraph bearing date the 3d of April, stating that the
talookdars were holding aloof from the rebel cause,
and that the Chief Commissioner fervently hoped there
would not be much longer any serious opposition to ou r
rule in Oude. (Hear.) Two lists bad been Sent in contaii .-
ing the names of those who had come forward, and whose
claims to the lands would be reinvestigated,. (Hear.)
h
The proclamation of the Governor-General en iss nee!
but considerably modified from that sent home. (Hear.)
From various private letters he bad read, he hoped there
was reason to believe that the policy now actually pur-
sued in Oude was one of conciliation and juk.ioe, and
the results, so far as they bad been ascertained, vi ere
believed to be sati-factory in their effect on the landed
proprietors and others. (Hear, hear.) The noble lord
took occasion to reply to the following question on the
paper by the hon. member for Devonport (Sir E Perry),
whether letters from the Governor-Gei,eral of India had
not been received, covering reports of a public character,
from Mr. Montgomery and other officers in Oude, re-
lating to the pacification of that country, and whether
tbere was any objection to laying such reports on
the tablet The letters he (Lord Stanley) had
seen were private letters, though containing en-
closures on public matters. Unfortunately he had
no control over those letters, and could not pro-
duce them ; and with regard to the enclosures, he could
not undertake then to produce them, believing it would
be for the benefit of the public service at present to
withhold them. It would be more convenient to delay
the publication till the receipt of the coming despatch
containing explanations. He would also take that op-
portunity of answering another question on the paper,