The Sun.
London, England, 1858-01-05 00:00:00

CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY.

(Front the Lancet )
Any ambitious metaphysician of aspiring genius de-
votel to the study of the doctrine of probabilities may
find ample scope for original speculation in seeking to
fairly apportion the amount of moral guilt atnong-t those
directly or indirectly irnplicat,d in any great crime. It
is essential to the well-doing of society that murderers
should receive the punishment of death. Yet there can
be little doubt that many a man who has hung for his
crime would have been held comparatively guiltlets could
the responsibility of the act have been apportioned
cording to abstract principles of justice, and that Mac-
heath woold have had no occasion to sing,
" Its strange we have not better company
Upon Tyburn tree."
A trial of three days' duration Las just been concluded
at Glasgow, which affords abundant material for much
speculation. James Thomson, a journeyman tailor, ad-
ministered a dose of prussic acid toayoung woman named
Agnes Montgomery, which rapidly caused her death.
He escaped detection at the time, as it is probable many
other criminals escape detection in Scotland, through the
absence of ac: roner's inquest. Twelve days afterwards
he again administered prussic acid to a man and his wife,
having mixed it with some whiskey, of which he invited
them to partake. They narrowly escaped death. Prus-
sia acid was detected in the spirit, and the body of the
girl, subsequently exhumed, presented abund tat evidence
of her desth being occasioned by this poison. For neither of
these crime.' could any motive be assigned. The psis
soner was condemned to die, and we believe the verdict was
mostjust, though his perfect sanity seems more than quo'.
tionable. For we confess to little of the fine-drawn ayma
paths, which relieves the perpetrator of a deliberately
planned murder from due punishment because he does
not come up to a certain standard of insanity. When
we see criminals so frequently feign madness, and hear
counsel cross-examine witnesses with the sole object of
proving it, we may well be more cautious in granting
reprieves on the score of insanity.
In reading the particulars of the above case it neces-
sarily becomes a matter of surprise how a poor tailor
could obtain possession of such an amount of so poisonous
a drug. On the trial the prisoner's shopmatem proved that
a good deal of conversation took place about the time of
Miss Smith's trial regarding the rapid effects of prussio
acid, which they said was sometimes used for photogras
pbic purposes. A carrier's boy proved that he took a note
from the prisoner to Hart's, a druggist in Glasgow, from
whom he got a phial. He could not read, but another
boy read the note on the way, aid said it was for prussic,
acid. The prisoner told the carrier's boy that he wanted
the stuff to dye his hair, but if he was asked by the drugs
gist he was to say it was wanted by a photographer. The
druggist's shopman proved that prussic acid was supplied
to the carrier's assistant on Sept. 12, and the latter said
be gave it to the prisoner on the morning of the 13th,
the day of Agnes Montgomery's death. It was proved
that the carrier's boy get a second supply of prussic acid
at Hart's on Sept. 24, the day before the second admi-
nistration of poison,
We cannot better express our opinion of the man who
sold the poison than by quoting the words of the judge
in summing up the case. He said, " that he never knew
of a more singular piece of carelessness in selling poison
than that exhibited by Stirling, the chemist, Hart's as-
sistant. He got no satisfactory answer to his question
as to who the acid was wanted for, and did not believe
that it was intended to be put to the use alleged, and yet
gave it without inquiry. He (the Lord Justice Clerk)
would not retract what he had said the day before to
Stirling himself, and would repeat, that the death of the
girl oueht to lie on his mind for lite.
But we must go further back than the chemist who
supplied the deadly drug. When the Sale of Poisons
Bill was shelved last session we thus wrote in these
columns :—" If dearly-bought experience is to be taken
as a guide, this delay of a bill restricting the sale of
poisons may be accompanied by the death, either acci-
dental or intentional, of some whose lives the time));
passing of a judicious measure might have saved."—
Med.
HadAtrahnisot,
billA ugbeuesnt 2012,81118p5a75.5ed,
nhi naatrvoreaetffeo
deb c: taa,
nnt
deh
de t mht
the woman
onpmoo
iwas
no cnown
itdlnue
lmdt
,nh
ee
pd andretoaobs
toy manner
mlayot
a:nn
have
could
aa
been
rneoi
evoe
ntde
alive, for no extreme vindictiveness was proved against
the prisoner. There is a chain of moral inculpation
sufficiently puzzling. Whether it will serve as a warning
the
emi
netmr
obde
ur se
toi tPo
B aorf iaa mmeenats
uwrheoenairceuPreparingpretvoenotpptohsee
recurrence of such crimes remains yet to be seen.