The Sun.
London, England, 1858-05-15 00:00:00

The Two-year-old Stakes.'

Pandora
Cait by Daniel O'Rourke
Clemantbe

IL-tt ng---6 to 4 on Pandora, 100 to 8 agst Cietuauthe,
100 to 7 ag*.t Daniel O'Rouike.
The Taliy-ho Stakes.

Impatience.
Walnut 2
Repulse
Betting-6 to 4®u Impatience.
Handicap Plate of 50 Slvs.

Wanderer 1
Rio 2
Pantolus
Betting-7 to 1 agst Pantolus, Bto 1 agst Rio, 10 to
1 agst Wanderer.

Hurdle Race.

Walnut..

Rafe
Rebecca .
Betting-2 to 1 agbt Rai
The Scurry Staker.

2
3

Salmon -1
Impatience 2
Lady Aintree .. 3
Betting-7 to 4 each agst Salmon and Impatience,
5 to 2 agst Lady Aintree. . .

LATEST BETTING.
DEBBY.
5 to 1 agst Fitz-Roland (off)
sto 1 agst Toxopholite (off)
12 to 1 agar Ancient Thiton (takeh)
12 to 1 apt, Longrange
16 to 1 agst The Hadji
100 to 5 aget Ditto (taken 20 to 1)
25 to 1 aget Ethiopian (taken)

BETTING AT MANCHESTER.—FBIDAY.
DERBY.
sto 1 agst Fitz-Roland (taken)
6to 1 ngst Toxopholite (taker')
12 to 1 agst Ancient Briton (taken)
14 to 1 agst Llngrange (taken)
100 to 6 agst Ditto (taken)
16 to 1 agst Sedbury (taken)
No others backed. No Oaks betting.

[ADVERTISEMENT.)—Among the numerous extraordinary
cures without medicine of Indigestion (Dyspepsia), Flatulency,
Constipation, Nervous, Bilious, and Liver complaints, Cough,
Asthma, Consumption, and Debility, effected by Du Barry's
telicious health-restoring Revalenta Arabica Food, the follow.
ng are not the least remarkable :—Cure No. 47,121.—" Miss
cEul irzeaobfeetxhtdrae
mc obs ,
e nervousnessofNazing,
io.
vf
oNuaszni
ensgs cdai rag
egs
tei,oWn,agaltlithaemriczls:mHsepritisit:sa,
and nervous fancies." Cure No. 48,314. " Miss Elizabeth
Yeoman, Gateacre, near Liverpool: a cure of ten years
dyspepsia and all the horrors of nervous irritability." Cure
No. 3,906. Thirteen years' cough, indigestion, and
general debility have been removed by Du Barry's excellent
Revaleuta Arabica Food. —JAMES PORTER, Athol-street, Perth.
Supported by testimonials from the following eelebrated 140,-
lessors of Chemistry: Dr. A. Um; Dr. Shorland; Dr. Harviney!
Dr. Campbell ; Dr. Gattiker ; Dr. Wurzer; Dr. t
jleruart;
Lord Stuart de Decies; the Dowager Countess of Cas t
Major Gen. Thomas King, and many other respectable
a
sons, whose health has been restored by it,
with full means of cure had failed. Suitably packed
I. 4s. 6d:; Sib. lls. ;
instruc-
tions, In canisters, 11b. 2s, 9d.; 2!.•free all re.
121 b. 225. The 121 b canisters are
Da Barry,
!Ay.
and 77,
ceipt of Post-office order.
Barry
Caaution against the Co.,
fear.
Regent-street, London.
Important The Vice-Chancellor Sir
er aliora
fuldangers of spurious imitations.—The
William Page Wood granted an
Barry's Revalenta Arabica Foo
Injunctionns. on the 10th March,
1854, against Alfred Hooper evill for imitating "Da

LONDON, SBTURDAY, MAY 15, 1858.

The contest has been decided in one branch of
the Legislature. It is still waging in the other.
Notwithstanding the disclaimer of any factious
motives by Lord SHAFTESBURY, the House re-
sponded to the truth and accuracy of Lord DERBY'
statements and arguments, and sympathised with
the high-minded and chivalrous declarations of the
E trl of ELLENBOROUGH. The result was a majority
of 25 of the Peers who heard or participated in
the discussion against the factious motion which
was reduced to 10 by the activity of the hunters
after proxies. The decision of the Lords was,
doubtless, a serious disappointment to the Pal-
merstonians. We do not see how Lord
SH A FTESB URY can henceforth insist on the
Etter observance of the Sabbath, when he lent
himself to the conspiracy hatched at Cambridge
House on Sunday last.
The manly and straightforward speech of Lord
ELL ENIOROUGH must have carried conviction with
it to_ every disinterested and unprejudiced person.
It enhances the regret that must be felt through-
out the entire kingdom at his resignation of the
office for which he was incomparably the best
qualified man in the United Kingdom. He might
not have written or forwarded the despatch, and
probably would not have published it had Mr.
SMITH— late of Cannon Row—furnished the in-
formation which, in justice and equity, he was
bound to forward to his successor, but which was
unfairly and unjustifiably withheld. He might,
we say, have changed his plans, but as it was we
honour him for the decision and promptitude with
which he repudiated the act of wholesalespoliation
and published that repudiation to the world;
boldly declaring that he neither invited nor
dreaded the resignation of Lord CANNING.
There is but one point about the entire
transaction for which Lord ELLENBOROUGH can
be blamed in the slightest degree. It was
for the resignation which he sent in without con-
sulting his colleagues, knowing that they would
unanimously reject the sacrifice, and believing
that no amount of factious feeling—no greed for
office, could stimulate any persons to 'go on after
the only person who could fairly be held respon-
sible had expiated his offence, if offence it could
be called. But while on this point, and this only,
we condemn—we must also admire. There are
faults that almost become virtues, and such was
the sole mistake of Lord ELLENBOROUGH. Under
the circumstances it was impossible to cast cen-
sure on his colleagues, who were totally un-
aeqnsinted with the intended publication ! Whe-
ther that publication were right or wrong, flay
could neither claim praise, nor receive reproach.
In.the Commons, r. CARDWELL 13111110 k fie n
the real point in dispute. He knew that the
Ho
use could not sanction or maintain the intended
contiscation,,,aou dtherefore he emphatically de-
clared that n the proclamation it was not his
intention to ask the Rgive any judg-
ment." This siding off on
to
a
collateral issue might
do very well during the palm, days
i
demurrers, when paltry quibble: were substituted
special
fur sound argument ; but it was unbecotan
would-be Minister of the Crown, and unsuitable
to to the atmosphere of a legislative assembly.
Admirably did Sir HUGH CAIRNS administer the
castigation so well merited by both Mr. CARD-
WELL and Mr. VERNON SMITH. His brilliant
speech was worthy of the best days of British
oratory, when there were intellectual giants in
the land. It exhausted the entire subject, and
might be placed on record as a noble vindication
of the Ministerial policy and proceedings with