The Sun.
London, England, 1858-05-21 00:00:00

LOTION, FRIDAY EVENING, MAY 21, 1858.

EORGE HOBSON begs to invite the attention
'Of of Gentlemen to his new Stock of Trowserings tor the pre'•
sent season, price 21s. to 255.
G. 11. submits for inspection his new Overcoats, in all the new ap-
proved and various shades of colour for sp ing wear. Excellence
with Economy. A suit of clothes made in a few hours' notice.
GEORGE HOMON, 57. Lombard-street.
ESTABLISHED 1796.

CF. HANCOCK, of Bruton-street and New
• Pond-street, Jeweller and Silversmith to the Plincipal
Sovereigns and Courts of Europe, begs leave to remove an erroneous
impression which exists amongst some of his customers, that he has
retired, or is about to retire, from business. This impression (which
is entirely unfounded) has probably arisonin consequene of the re-
tirement and selling off of a jeweller of the sane name, also of New
Bond-street, but with whom C. F. Hancock is not, and never has
been, in /my way connected, either in business or by relationship.

FIVE POUNDS WEEKLY, may be perma-
nently realised by either sex, with ea:h pound expPndeci.
Particulars clearly show that thesa incomes are so well secured to
those investing, that to fail in realising them is Impossible. Parties
may comm2nce with sma'l investments, and by increasing them out
of their profits; can, with unerring certainty, realise an enormous
income. No partnership, risk, liability, or e.nbarking in business.
Incoutestible authorities given in proof of these statements; Enclose
a directed stomped envelope to Joan LEWIS, Esq , 32, Trinity-square,
Southwark.

gthreTr,tihtwa:naertgtihscalie ntsctsihurait. an insinuation shoull have been
plained cf was Landed in and read by
Sir D. LE MAucHaNT (the glen.) at the table of the
house.
, The motion was then agreed to.
table covering
of the d eh srponast
THE VOTE OF CENSURE.
house
ti t
htio,.ninge
• Lord PALMERSTON a,,ked the Chancellor of the
resr
laid whetheron
the
any
EthicecphoT
from L(.rd Canning, and if so, if he bad any objection to
produce it—(hear, het.t)—and the next question
esmn
transmittingoh
wished to ask was whether it was clearly understood
that the debate on the resolution of the right bon. gen-
tleman the member fir Oxford should finish to-night
—(hear, hear) —or whether it should stand over till
after the Whitsuntide "holidays. (Hear, hear.) He
presunied the right hon. gentleman did not wish that
the discussion on a motion that reflec'ed on the con-
duct of her Majesty's Governtnent should be postponed
till next week. (Hear and cheers.)
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, said be
assumed it was the general understanding that the de-
bate should
.be concluded to-night. (Hear, hear.) Of
course he could not have given notice of such a motion,
because it was not in his power to settle such a matter
beyond giving an example. He intended to offer a few
remarks to the hou-e to-night on the motion, and after-
wards that the house would coma to a division ou the
question. (Cheers.) .No notice had been given to him
relative to the first part of the noble lord's motion, relative
to any covering despatch being received, but if there had
been one received he thought it would be advantageous
t $ the country, the house, and Lord Canning, that it
should be Laid on the tablo of the house, but he as
unable then to give an answer to the question.
I,id PALMERSTON—Can the Secretary of the
Board-of of Control answer the que, tion

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he
thought there was no covering dispatch, because the
dispatches received from Lord Canning were. addrassed

.o the Court of Directors.

Mr. LABOUCLIERWasked if any authentic copy of
Lord Canning's proclamation had -been received by
her 11.1".mjesty's Goverrime,:t,
Toe CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he
believed no authentic copy of the proclamation had been
received, but he believed letters had been received from
Lord Canning referring to i's publication, and its being
in operati ir. (Hear, bear.)
Mr. GLADSTONE asked whether, when her Ya
jesty's Governwnt heard the proclamation wa,3 coa.i• g
from Lord Canning, they had any.intimatisn of any ex-
planation being supplied?
Toe CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said no
intimation of the kind was received by her MajeAy's
Governmeat. The first intimationtheyhfrard of it way from
a statement made in the otter Hou-e cf Per:iament by
the Marquis of Lansdo -vne. On receiving an intimation
from the right hon. g. ntletnan that he ended ti pot
this question, be (the Cliancelkr of the Exchequer) cum
tnnnicated with his late colleague, the E zrl of Ellen-
borougb, and he bad authorised him (tie Chenctlor of
the Exchequer) to steta, that at; no time, to the best of
his recuikcticn, wee any intimation of that kind made to
him.. (Loud cheers.)
The subj!ct then dropped.
WITHDRAWAL OF MR. CARDWELL'S