The Sun.
London, England, 1858-07-13 00:00:00

AYES-213.

Adams, W. Farquhar, Sir M. Mills, Arthur
Adderley, C. Fellowes, E. Wilms, M.
Agar-Ellis, L. , Ferguson, Sir R. Moffatt, G.
Alexander, J. Finlay, A. - Morgan, 0.
Ayrton, A. Fitzgerald, J. Morris, D. '
Bagwell, John Fitzgerald, W. H. S. Mowbray. J. R.
Baines, Rt. Hon. W. Fitzroy, Hon. H. Naas, Lord •
Ball, E. Foley, H. J. Naoier, Sir C.
Baring, Sir F. Forester, Col. Newark, Viscount
Bernard, Col. Forster, Sir G. Newport, Viscount
Baxter, W. E. Forster, C. Nic.l, D.
Beach, W. French, Col. North, Col. J.
Beale, S. (lard, R, ' Ogilvy, Sir J.
Beecroft,;G. Garnett, W. Paget, C.
Bennet, P. Gore, W. Pakington, Sir J.
Black, Adam Grenfell, C. Palk, L.
Bolder°, Col. H. G.
Gray, Captain Palmer, Robert
Bonham-Carter, J. Grey, R-
Palmerston, Viset.
Bouverte, Hon. P. P. thifilth.C. - _Patten, Col. W.
Bovill, W. Grogan, E. Peel, Gen.
Boyd, J. Cu, uey, J. Pinney, Colonel
Brand, H. Hadfield. G. Powell, F.
Bridges, Sir B. Hamilton, Lord C. Pryse, E.
Briscoe, John Hamilton, G. A. Pritchard, J.
Brocklehurst, J. Hankey, T. Pugh, D.
Bruce, 11. A. Harcourt, G. Puller, C.
Buckley, Gen. Har ly, G. Rebow, John
Buller, Sir J. Harris, J. Robartes, T.
Buller, J. W. Harlington, Marquis Roll, J. ,
Burghley, Lord Hassard. W. Russell, F. W.
Butt. I. Heard, J. Rust, James
Buxton, C. Henley, J. Schneider, H.
Byng, G. . Henniker. Lord &later, G.
Caird, James Hill, Lord B. . Scott, Major
Cairns, H. Hodgson, K. Seymer, H.
Calcraft, J. H. Hodonn, W. Smith, R. V.
Campbell, R. Holford, R. Smith, Sir F.
Carden, Fir R. W. Holland, E. Smyth, Col.
Cardwell, E. Hope, A• Somerville, Sir W.
Cartwright, Col. Hopwood, John Spaight, J.
Cecil, Lord R. Bombe, W. Stafford, Marquis
Charlesworth, J. Howard, C. Stanley, Lord
Sturt, Col. ,
Christie, Samuel Hudson, G.
Sullivan, Michael
Clark, J. Ingham, R.
Talbot, C.
Clay, James Jervoise, Sir J.
Thompson, Gen
Codrington, General Johnstone, H. B. •
Tile, W.
Cogan, W. ' Joliffe, H. Trefusis, C.
Cole, H. A. Jones, D. • Turner, J. A.
, Collins, T. Kelly, Sir F.
Vance. J.
Coningham, W. Kendall, N. Vansittart, G.
Cowper, W. F. Kershaw, J.
Vansittart. W.
Corry, H. T. L. King, J. Verner, Sir W.
Cross, R. Kinnaird. A. Vivian, H. H.
Davey, R. K n atchbull-llugess en ii
Waddington, H.
Davie, Sir H. R. F. Knight, F. Walcott, Admiral
Deedes, William Langton, W.
Walpole, S.
Denison, W. H. Lang ton,ll. G.
Warne, J.
De Vere, S. Lefroy, A. Weguelin, T.
Disraeli, B. Lennox, Laid H. J
Whiteside, J.
Drummond, H. Leslie, C. P. VirbitfoorP, IL
Du Cane, C. Levinge, Sir R.
Wiekhard, H. W.
Duff, M, Locke, John
Williams, Sir W
Doke, Sir J. lopea. Sir M. Wilson, J.
Dunbar, Sir W. Lovaine, Lord
Duncan, Viscount Lygon, Hon. F. Wise, 3.
Wood, Sir C.
Duncombe,Hon. A. Lytton, Sir G.
Hondas, G. Macartney, G. Wood, W.
Dunlop, A. M'Cann, J. Wortley, J. S.
Edwards, Henry M'Clintock, J. Wynn, Sir W.
Egerton, W. Waling, R. Yorke, E.
El phinstone, Sir J. Mangles, C. E. Young, A.
Eltan, Sir A. Manners, Lord T.
Esteourt, T. Maxwell, Col.
Euston, Earl Weigand, Viscount
Evans, T. W. Miles, W. Jolllffe, Sir IY .
Ewing, H. Miller, S. B. Taylor, Col.
NOES-21.
Gilpin, Charles
Greene, John
Greville, C6l. F.
Ker, B. .
Lindsay, W.
Macarthy, A.
Paget, Lord C.
Pease, H.
Pllkington, J.

TELUO.

Akroyd,
Al cock, T.
Biggs, .T.
Bowyer, G.
Clifford, Col .
Clive, G.

Ridley, G.
Roebuck, J.
Stapleton, J.
Trelawny, Sir J.
White, J.

Cox William
Crossley, F.
Dalglish, It.

IKLLEJJ.
Hatt, W.
O'Brien, P.

MAKING ME BBST OF IT.

(Front the Morning Post.)
Lord Derby's Ministry may now be said to have
reached a harbour of refuge, and to be tolerably
safe from any immediate danger of shipwreck. A
sudden squall might upset it even now before Par-
liament rises ; but the probability is that its end is
not yet. Mr. Disraeli owned to a reluctance to try
the experiment of an autumn session ; so that un-
less some new calamity should arise to make the
services of a thoroughly effective Minister necessary
to the safety of the State, the chances are that place
and power, and with them opportunities and re-
sponsibilities, will remain where they are for the
present. Upon this prospect the Tories have good
reason to felicitate themselves. When the present
session opened they had not the remotest prospect
of power. An incident which the actit?st sagacity
could not have foreseen gave them the pas, and
lifted them in a motnentfrom the depths of despair
to the pinnacle of success. So complete a piece of
pod fortune has seldom been since the disuse of
lotteries. If Ministers and their supporters are
wise, they will bear their elevation meekly, and
not play the part of braggarts quite so glibly and
vaingloriously as some of them seem now to be
ready to do. It would bo well for them to bear
in mind that they have not passed one single
bill of their own. Their India Bill is duo to
Lord Palmerston and the Commons It does
not represent the Ministerial policy, hut the results
of Parliamentary wisdom. No doubt every act
does this within certain limits. But the India
Bill does so pre-eminently. The bill brought in
by Ministers when Ellenborough was king, found
no favour at all ; and i s prom 4i rs were compelled
to go to the House for expressions of opinion, and
for intimation of what it would pass, on receipt of
which they concocted the measure now sent up to
the Lords. It would be folly to ascribe this bill
to the statesmanship of Ministers. In its form it
is the bill of the House of Commons—in its sub-
stance it is the bill of Lord Palmerston. It ill be-
comes a Ministry so situated to take every oppor-
tunity of lauding itself, and still less to depreciate
the political position of the statesman to whom it
is indebted for all the measures it has succeeded in
passing.
The history of political struggles in this country
affords numerous parallels to the position which
Lord Palmerston now occupies both in and out of
Parliament. Pitt, Canning, Sir R. Peel, and other
eminent statesmen, have all in turn been told to