The Sun.
London, England, 1804-06-23 00:00:00

HOUSE OF COMMONS.

FRIDAY, 'JUNE- 11:
AVvsagc.from the Lord's announced their assent
to 0$ Linen-baty Exemption Bill, to the Ayles.
Bill, and to the 'Attornics' Indemnity
EH.

Mr. JOHNSTONE, from the Office of the Chief
Sf!cretary of Ireland, presented an Account of the
Officers on Half. pay in that Country.—Ordered to
lie on the Table.
Mr. OwEN presented certain Papers relative to
the Maltratta pursuant to an Order of the
Howe of the 7th of flay.—Ordered to lie on the
Table.

Colonel O'Dt.t.t presented a Petition from the
County of Limerick, against some alterations in the
present state, of the Corn Love., proposed by
tort from the Committee on these Laws.—Ordered
to lie on the Table. •
Mr. FOSTER gavenotice, that on Monday, he
would move for leave to bring in a Bill to appoint
Commissioners to examine into the State and ices
of the Public Offices in Ireland.
The Resolutions of the Corn Committee were
read and agreed to, and a Bill ordered to he brought
in, pursuant to the said Resolutions.—The. Report
then recommitted, and certaio additional Row...
lutions were agreed to. ." •
Mr. WicitErtroitcit moved, that on Monday
Counsel should be heard on the geport of the Slave
Trade Bill. Ordered..
IRISH DUTIES.

*The Resr,lutions of the Committee o(Supply rela-
tive to the Irish Duties-, were toad. Severaf of the
Resolutions'.were agreed`tO ; hut "on the que'stion be-
ing, put upon the, Resolution to impose a .duty, of
two shillings -on the stamps 'necessary for.regitteting
Freeholds, 's
Mr. DAwsoN and Mr. HuTcHtwsoN objeAed to
this Tax, upon the grounds that it, went 'to give.the
Crown a certain degree of controul over, the': votes
of Elettor,:, and materially to 'infringe the Freedom
'Eleftion. . „.
Sir JoRN Ntwrotur defended the Tax, and.ob-
served, that those who were 'really Freeholders
would feel themselves under great obligations tO'the
Right ,Hon,. Gentletnan for. proposing such a.regi.i.
lation, as it would in a great measure put a stop to I.
the great number of fidi,tias votes, which had al.,
ways been fxtremely troublesome.
Mr. FOSTER replied to the observations' of.the
Hein. Gentlemen oppositt to him (I):Awsos and:
HUTCH iNsoN) and declared his resolution to
severe in the Tax, since he saw chat the IrisliAiein
bers were divided in opinion upon it. Had they:-
been- unanimous in their opposition, ,he came _to the i

House -prepared to substitute instead of it a TaX
upOn the lease granted by the landlord to the Leona ;
but as this was not the case, .he.. would persist.
Tire house then divided on this resolution—Ayes

. ,
1 1 9--Noes 31.
The Resolutions were then all agreed, to, and a
Bill or Bills conformable to 'them -otdercd to be
brolight in. '
Mr. FOSTER then moved for several Accounts,
isr, For an Account of the Funded Debt of Ire-
land, the progress of its increase for sortie years past,
and as it now stand.' , .
zd, Fur an Account of the Net Produce of the
Irish Revenue, its Decrease fur some years past,
and its present state.
3.1, For an Account of the Balances in the hands

of the Revenue Coltetiots, and the Securities tog
theui in the hand; fQotietittnert.
_ _

444 For an ACcotint of the,Balsnee in the hands
of the Receiver General of the Stamp Duties....,
sth, For an Account of the Balance in the hank
of the- Posr_mas ters.General. '

Mr. FitArtois triquired whether it was intended
to lay before the House the names of those persons
io_wllose 1151,11(15_0e balances were left - • -

Mr. FOiTER replied, that the names. of the de-
ceased Colle&ors were already before the
•anti that :the balances in the hands of the existing
'Collators were comparatively trifling.
This Motions were then all agreed to.
LORD ADVOCATE OF SCOTLAND.

Mr. WI4ITBItS AD moved that the Papers re)a.
. tiv,e .to the case of -the Lord Advocate of Scotland,
shOuld be read.. •
The LORD ADVOCATE'S Letter to the Sheriff
'Substitute of Baoffshire, together with the Letter of
.the latter to the Sheriff Clerk, beitsg read, •
Mr. IPrIIITR READ -expt'essed hit satisfadion.
that the Right Hon. 'Gentleman, against whom the
charge, founded on thLse.Papers, had. been brought,
was noW in his place,, and in a situation to make'his
own defence. The Papers to which he adverted-, had
now- been regularly apdpubliely;read. He, hoped, that
they had.heen privately perused by the Members of
the.Hotise, who were prepared, he had no doubt, to
give their decision-on the present important and inte-
retingquestion,witli fall the candour, justice and free,
dem; which became abranchisf the British Legislature:
He hoped that all -were free ,from prejudice and Pas.
sion on this'orcasion. He himself too laid eloilp to
.that freedom from prejudice.
_He confessed that
. when' the le«ers in questiOn first came to. his hands,
he had read theM with'.warinth, and had entered
warmly into, the conduit
_which his feelings on the
occasion-prompted. him to pursue. But. he assured
,the Houle that this warmth; sin his part, was perfed.
ly free from passiorq-hot lit his zeal for the liberty of
d the•subje, as it ,was reetignized by the British Con.
,•stitution,- did he forget char he was standing forward
'as the accuser of an, individual,.4.ho had certainly
duous and difficult dutierto.perforin. . Having thus
preparedliiinself to 'consider the point coolly. and:.
, impartially, be trusted that what he had to offer
wtitild- not exceed the hounds of what the:Papers on
the justly and imperiously 'demanded. It
was fortunate, in this case, every point of
view, fors the ends; of- public justice, and for
-the interest. of the perionctiefly concerned, that the
'accuser and the accused had met face to face. The_
,House by this means had an opportunity;of hearing
,the defence of the accused from his own m9tit lief° re
they came to a recision, and would'thutlie enabled"'
to judge_ .with accuracy and' precision, whether the
inferences which he drew from the 'Papers on the
Table' were founded or not.'. At all events, af.
ter .the progress; which had been- already made in 1
'this business after the steps. which the House had
thought proper already' to take in the present in-
stance, he was-confident that: every man would feel
that it was necessary that- some decision .should be
given. The House- certainly was • not pledged' in
any way tot decide either 'for or • against-rhe per.
son who was 'arraigned before ihem,-_ bur,rtm some!
decision -they must come, and the decision would•
rest upon the cleatest and most satisfattory
from the fortiinate 'circumstance that. the Lord
Advocate himself was present. For the sake of
justice, -thee-',' to the individual, who, 'according
to his :infoetnation, and as he was fat the present
intitled io conclude, was unjiiStly and illegally
oppressed; for the sake of justice to the People
.of Scotland, who had a, right to claim from the
House a proof that none should oppress them with'
impunity ; for the sake.of justice to-the Right Hon.
'Gentleman himself-, whose professional charafter -is
deeply involved, the House inttst One way or other
come to a decision. They must either decide that.
the whole of the materials-before them are false acid
unfounded fabrications, or that the charge is true and
well-founded '; in, which latter case, they must take
care that -the .People of Scotland shall be, shel.
tered from such proceedings for die future (loud
cry of ." bear!")—li was but'fair, honourable, and
just, that the individual accused should.be acquaint.
eti with the precise nature and words of the Motion,
which he was about to submit to the'HouSe. If the
House, after having heard the Defence of the
Right Hon. Gentleman, shotild feel it - incumbent
upon them to go along with him in that Motion, his
dutY'would not rest there, It would, intiectl,, be a--
• flagrant neglea •of his duty, if he, were in such an
event to stop -short at the Resolution which he -ndiv-
meant., lo propose.- It rtiust-be followed op by a
Motion for an Address to HI v`MA J ssTY, to remove
that person froM an office which the House had pro.
flounced . him unfit to exercise. The proposition,
which he was now about to submit to the,House, was
this, that the Right Hair. Gentleman aurasgnilty of
illegal and oppressive condua, and had aded contra,:y
to his ofcial duties. The powers of the:Lord.Ad-
vocate
.uf Scotland were certainly great, but surely.
they were not so great as to allow him to aft con.'
trary. to the clearest Principles of justice, nor in such ,
a manner as he is stated to. have done by the papers
before the House.., But sopi)ose for a moment; ,that.
what the Lord -AdVOCite had "done was. not illegal,
still he. contended that it wasin_ the highest- degree--
cruel and grossly oppressive.. ...-.ltre. did not think
it necessary ,to :trouble -th.e-liouse with. a parti-
cular detail of the transitdion,. :as they had heard, it
before bUt as -the Right Hon. Gentlema'n4as-nof
Present-duringhis fiitin'er. statement's, it was neces.,
sary that he should, touch upon it, that the:R ion.
Gentleman and he, might agree upon the fittts. .The
transadion • thin was shortly this c a person. Of the
name of Robert GarroW„made a statement of a'case
tO the-Right bon. Gentleman, merely as a Counsel,
and not itrhis official situation of 464 Advocate.—
In this ease it was set foith.that Garrow had entered.
-into a Volunteer Corps,•,and that, contrary to thF,
,commands of his ntastel; lie had left his 'work .io
order to go to an inspection_ of
.thc Corps_to Which
he belonged., In consequence of ,Illis.P;,rlgYi z%V.46
discharged, and made his application to Counsel, to
know what wagei'lit was enttlerl. tti
The answer was, 'that Morrison, the Mastery had
ClOne nothing contrary to Law.. - This Opinion, also,'
contained a very on Mux.ris9t), Jf. •
.opinion liad•passed secretly betty .en
Client, he would not aflirin• that any an tam
ion co:b, 1
Lund..l upon it i but when it was, promuf&atcd.: to 1

the manner it had been, it was certainly a mos un.
just libel upon the person- whose condaa it was
designed to attack. Now,- 'be had said, ,it
this
proceeding was oopressiv even if it bad been legal
(a. cry of " hear hear I") Was .IVh;rrison accused
ut disloyalty ? 11/4,lo.—Was be denounced to the Lord
Advocate in his Official capacity ? No.—But with..
out any thing .of this sort, when' it stood. upon the
-Lord.Advoctite's- own-recoitled-opinions-thlt• Mot- -
risop had done nothing contrary to lave, the Right.
Honourable' Gentleman had. pronounced:sentence, -
without hearing from the accesed, patty .one
in his own defence—Thud cries of o. hear! hear P')
—lt was'. ihrely very pos,,ible, and the Bigler lio.
nourable Gentlemen might- have 'considered' it so,
that. Morrison, the: Person accused,,, might be .Orte.
of the,.mosr loyal men in the empire, •and that the
servant might at-thesarne time be extremely dia.
fated, .He did not 'say, howeVer,. that the servant-',
was disaffeaett, for. he professed' to know nothing .
at all about-lite matter. At'ille time when the qd-ei--
tion was first agitaio in the Eause; .11e.kneW'nc.
thing more about Mr. Morrison Allan bout his Kr.
`vant ; but it appeared,onthe ;face of the letter of the
'Lord Advocate hiniself,' that he had not duneiny
thing disloyal'of illegal ; for, in the letter, the Right,
HonOurable.Gentleman.said, that he-suspeded Mor-
rison ofa secret spirit of dis-affeaion. Information,
however; badleached him since be had last men.
tioned the present subjea, of the particulars of the
, story, anti from this it appeared that the servant had
-been .diScharged,upon giOundS,' he.or any
other Member of the House would discharge a ser.
vast; without that servant being, however, in the
smallest degree, liable 'to' 06. charge of distiffee.
tioo. The servant: had, been employed -thatching
. a batn, a thing that, at that time•Ofehe yett`i„ (La•
not admit_olanY .delaY ; and, -therefore; his Master,
told hire that lie intist not' leave it, in order to go
to his insPeaion, otherwise he would discharge him. -
The servant; natWiihstanding Went, to the
speCtiOn, and his mastet.aecorstingly.turnid.him aft:
this was the cause of• the servant beng,.oisthirgo, •
and a very reasonable cause, mitts opinion,' for the •
work necessary -Th• be performed, was -•-• very 'trgen't
and pressing. But here 'he- w'ouh.l. mention a
Or two with respea to-the. Volunteer Syst.em.., This
was in he tire' it a free service.; butt,.
. were we to be drageonedr into being Vbltinteers ? ,-q
Were we to be branded with the name of diSaffeeleti
persons, because 'cifeurnstances might' prevent .us
,frorn allowing otir Se'rVants'tdenter i ell nto e.Volun.,-,
leer et4ps ? It, co'Oftt not be; ThiS:serviee %vas .vci.
luritatY, anti it never WasApe:lpt, Oat. W''e tire-re to:beA
chaStisett.-into it, and treated. as :mere
This'Was not the
,case•here; nor could iTt*'the case .
in,Seotland. Loyalty Was-, unitersally wread
most unexampled Mariner over all-the,Empire, and!
he believed theseverity,.ernploYe4 ;an
;this occasion':
to'be as 'unnecesaary as it w:as ilkgala,ndOpPresive ;. 4
I (loud crier of " bear I. hear!" Tl.tete ,fives another
feature in this eiv:e' which he Would not have -tneii:
honed wiless the Right Hon. Gentleman had been ice
his ,place. Marrison,•hetinderstood,.tatf appliedtti.
Olt Lord Atlitwine after he had received his leiter
+—stated i:.e circumstances of the eio;,, acid request.l
ed. that the Lord Advocate would write a letter,'
iicknoWledging that had affect upon Misibferma-
tion.—(liere the..Lerd Advocate said, that .Murri-
eon had applied to him, but not • in the terms that
-iHon. Gentle
he man mentioned). Well, he had
appl
.
ied, however, -and the request, in his opi..
nion, was a verfreasonableone. The answer-given,
according to his.. infOrmat ioe, was, that Morrison was
a fool for not quietly consenting to pay his fines, and-,
acquiesce in the sentence of the'Lord Advocate-
in the present 'state of. the Country. Really if
such an answer was given, and he was to consider
himself omnipotent in Scotland, if his information on
,this point was true, then he 'considered the offence as '
being; highly aggravated (crier,of."heav,/ hear!")
and it was a proof that the Right Hon.. Gentle.
man was unfit for the situation Which .he 'had.----,--
Hehad not the psesumption,to claim much acquaint.:
• ante' with the laws of Scotland,, 'but he would refer- ,
thei House to the Statute of William. the 3d, 'passed.:
expressly. for - the purpose of, securing, the. Liberty
of the.Subjed. It Might, however, be said, :that:
though the law was" precise, still there 'night ly a:,
crisis-when-a person-who- was placed in a situation
of such responsibility,. must not strialy. adhere
to the' 'fortns:of law: BLit here the, precise case-
Was provided fat .in case of Invasion, A
peled person was . to. be apprehended 'by a 'War-
rant -from the Privy •Council, but even in. thiscase
heisVis‘to hive infcirrhation ofthe cause of his deten.
tian, and'a right to. trial within 6o days after his
commitment. But here there was neither Warrant
nor. information. A person too was entitled .ta.bail
in such cases as the present,- but here there was no
bail allowed, but the-man was to remain Confined
till the Lord Advocate's sovereign will and pleasure
should be:known. Undoubtedly, when the Country'
was in danger of Tnvasiiin, a great responsibility,,'
attached upon the Office of the Right Hon-Gentle-
nun, but, as he had already observed, this case ,was
spe-cially provided for, and therefore the Lord Ad-'
vocate's conduct was not only oppressive but
gal.; forip his Official Situation he had no business
with the matter and if the, man was,disloyal; the .
proper power to, commit him,
.upon an emergency,'
was the Privy COuncil.: The powers of Lord Advo-
cate.were certainly high.. He would not, now talk,
'of the propriety of his uniting in himself all the
powers of the Grand Jury, the,Corooes.'s Inquest, and •
the At torney.General; But lie nut only. had the power .
to prosecute, but to abstain ,from prosecution when. -
he thought fit. It had been so decided not many years
ago in the House of Lords. These were certainly
enormous poners; a'nd he Who was. intrusted wide
them, ought to be a 'man -Of no Party, and who
ought to •suffer under no imputation, of improperly
and. partially prosecuting;, or abstaining from prose.%
eating; when there was just cause for it. Therefore,'
lie 'asset<t'ed, 'that
sent lnst,tnce, t he
nottll,e
course
he r
i; tie pursued;
in.
nd
cthe
v eriPr e.
s if
was the right course, still his coo.'
duct was ext'remety blameable. "Xhat defence lie '•
ineendetii.to set he, did.. not know, nor would
.1)4 presume to anticipate.- He conclUded with oh.
serving, that in e;ise the charge should be made ,Our,
rile trriAise
,would feet it was improper that a per-
joia, so intlyettet in Iris ze'al should• hold the situe-,.
2100 of LW* Advaeste of Scotland. He would'
th,elefore 'proceed t0,111.4.-MOtio'n; 1

The -SrPAKEI here observed, that tale leg"
ininotht c:1
}puce'l (b. ()leg twhes'Mwo w heir '
int.; ::;e7al
after having delivered his defence, he was 10

I tire, • -
Th • e LORD' ADVOCATE.—"
feel and ackoowledoe the very manly • 1 ol'en way
and
in which, the Hon. Gentleman has brou_glit forwar
thii.e.ctisairon-i'heli:tidone every titfiig in power
to make a charge of grave and serious inature as
this'B9•PalataiYle• asvissible.; and I have nothing.
to
lay to his charthat I e 110 Pr°-
cxcqt, perhaps,'
ceide'd on too tnformation. It has seldoui
happeried'to• me to have addreSsed this Rouse'
little expeeted that I shouldhave nowbe4o °l)°gefi
I certainly_
iii
the ehargs
myself ave been Obliged defend f
do so ; ,and i'ticli.Jess did I, eXp-e:q. that
Those
ar
of mr),, il.fid injustice and o;opresiiati,
charges I am tint ictustOineit to 'Rave made ag"in't
rice
.
me,. and. will
.say,.
,I believe the words, d
e
and oppression have. never' befdre. been cOul'i
y th'at
.with thenairieTbear.. 'I at *h n very all: was
charge
which .has brought against ine,
brought by 'a Gentlemen not -acqUainted melt ,ic
or With my CharaL4er. The FLiuse too is sPine
'unactivainted.,with.ine;,-- but I will. -venture 53Yn'
that in my own Country, where I. au" 1,°°:1,(1.)
it would "nOt 'be'. believed that I had II*"
than-
wilftti injnstice 'opPression against '2"Y me -
shout,
Was drel-toctourable Gentleman •to'. rcP:rfe;lE.,;ini
so in the. .where. I- principally
tong
borgli),4here_ would be a ..hutiarld th..6usod
ready to repel the charge, and •,roba.blY Z can
arms 'aISo ratsd-igaiti-sr him' who made it; ,ion
assure-, the ilopourable.Geotleinari ,that the accti''4. if
itself is to me a considerable poni,hmentia. ,41
Ihave in the least.
a'st,ioinr'ed Mr. Morrison;.....he. A e..
his friends haveiound the way:to retaliate.nyst soft'
verely. The trinSaltizyn Which-ts now the silbje6l 4
'the charge,- turd;. p1a,.ce.40 long air) as IV -3015
agO,, and 'did ,nOt, bear a
2-..svnahle of it. while was,'attending the Rouse daily ;
..,O'or'Pfter I had .tetttrrieiPtc;..Scattand, V, the b"'`).3l.
f
tots .„sharge,„apd obliged
odatTe},s;:' id7.lolu)n).4.lPydge"-tii initt x .exercise4°ll yni tu'rcig-'ce'adi
...defend myself. " dt)',..l-Icit jay tfie least ~bl.itine to
T i4lll. t:011-•
-vinced„.btOttglri- fOr'Waid'ihiS.b6siness a; soon as
116. Pat LIP posv.ssilon ,of tAe.iliformail°•
". "P:
lit-greiunds•his acpt•lsuion:.; gust °I;
server in "dipswer to-anobseivatiert_flial ids .03`
, on a Ike, ocCli'sllia; r Opfesiirh." suflioten sly ac-
to -.0141:1;:01..t. here to,
Ccrunt ftir theisilkiets of Al rAorri
Apiliskoiovas not tO-besci ti,ted:;4l.le • 'ft
. how to •-•clopkleity,piri.k7tesl-;,"-atiir)fte r•tfaJ.l,,s; S:Pote-
,to me a mast respectableAgeni- «i CO
oh the subject. :" 1; Agetit:"-thathe' teiit
:itOn'nf *!fiiigrs't‘resli'ielabilllyZ in .l,is ,;
man.
MOrfis:OP 4. aliO. 1-f,undil-soinc
etl uttY)Bl:3lllP:!.;lllail(lll:er,S~lYriVit'ihnit.--,J.....(if • ft,l.6l'falc°lll.t"..lcali.
was by. n' mearis4,-as cud jtidget (liar.
titer
loyal Mary that .k-believed him to be-;:- that
business ab ut Jte.'l,li•as surd' de,
froth misapprehension,
.I had said ,qg'4"s::ou'iJ
come to me and say so, I shtiulci ghats l'•
im . s 4 ev•
ert
tisfaetion in-my power.„- Mr. :
never did' conic ,to the tor the purpos•
e; of irttouse
any -explanation, Ldo not think. the .`"
-/Vloc.; .
Would' expeef. that I was to search out for Mr' ~,on.
rison,. and go upon my; knees for. his satisfati) lLti
Froth the time of this conversation • I had wt l,u
4kgent, I never heard a syllabic more about,thf :to
ainess, until, when exercising my oftcial ;
Scotland,,.'l learned that-a charge wasinale ag`
me, ':in this HOse,. for unjust opi)resive ive
duet. I.am sure, nothing Mr. IVlorrisoo coo4,lll'.sn
felt from my! letter, wag equal to the pain
having so serious an: accusation brought aVia.:fica-
in my. absence.—Before I enter into the cor'''e-: it
tion .of Mr. Morrison's condo and: of 47'4,:,:in0
w ill ,be necessary, to put the Floitse in 11,,;tiand
of-the peculiar ind critical situation or" tytll be
at the time that .Letter was written, Ic
tIIC vg.
hat tSGtnetal
I'lttlereee -44aarirdY, dutiesf r
wrn he;ftt. o.tihs ei
the yes
it,oh.ofe.nmsAi.
bdvviYi
of Scotland .;
art times to the situation,
.but tricire peculi‘lo;
the. times and 'circumstances when I the" he,' i• 3, I
station.. Ai to the peetiliar situation
particularly alfude to i4,ineaiis or det•eirce, to
were then so very Small,: -that Scatland wit:
be.considered ai a CoUntry:•standing bY-itself;,'Ejj'ai-
, were wholly inadequate.- I do not meati,
pute the feast bl;me to His Majesty's late
much k, ss to Highness,-wfto siii)P"iti
direct the disuibulioo of orc'4s.--
Ire ryas
11ecC
sally feltt in Sdotla'nd, it was ar's°l`itie,''-apira,'
sary to concentrate the principal 0' 1.,"; t -the'
- about
.the Scat at the G(k,eininent, Mid 'e;"1
hcart of! the EMPire,
Might be• felt ex-posed- to-ai:ack. it •
'lnown 'to'an tfilliary -Men what %le.& 1arge,4,4.;
portion - of. the British Army is •fornished by
laod,,it would hardly be helieVed, that, the
left for the defence.of Scotland were iwck
olions of ae'scrve,atid one-Regime:fit of Drafrol,'
47hieli, with thirteen -Battalion of Scotell
even 'though, the extrernittir
filmed the whole of iii;:Defelisive.E.JrCe of ~li3
Country,. exclusive of ilte Volunteers, I liAd'rf4
,csi'vd a letter f'rom Commander to
of aSc Ni and (Lord
,MP I infi) fining me'
o (jays
;distribution of the Forces.‘ On the .w hole .E/.1
st
of Scotland, Nortli'of the Frithof,Forth,.there'v;'‘,.
bat one.:lt'lifitia Regiment, an but ue',,c -
,ly.
raised (the R
Ross.shire.eginieni.). Coincatuu.
in Chief of 8!..70i Lind had judged it proper
;),3-1:
c'entrate.all his Forces 4t Edinburgh, ilia! the
of. the Country, at least; might be defended .I°6,
any attack'. 'Li those circumstances, it Was evid°o.
the-defence of the North! of Scotland rested .110,f:-
entirely tipon the V."6lUriteers. Of the Volanteer°;..
BanfEhire, not a third part, were armed, and -tr
most evident,thzt if other -farmers would follt~ chi
ekample of Mr.
,Morrison, that only,de,fence Of'
Country would 'have failed. • Under, those '''fy
cratstances,. would 'ad :AS the safetyfety
l
-tate_zetlured; afld responsil;
. et
by the old and frigid. rules of. strict law. f
1611 convtaioii, that if tfie
to land: in the.
.Nortn) :the- salvation 01.5c`71.

I

'