The Sun.
London, England, 1867-09-03 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, TUESDAY EVENING, SI P rEMBE It 3, 1867:.

DEPOSIT DEPARTMENT. THE CON-
SERVATIVE LAND SOClETY.—Persons wish-
ing to invest large or small sums, receiving half-yearly
interest warrants at four per cent, per annum, with power
of withdrawn 1 at fixed periods, according to amount in-
vested, may deposit sums daily at the offices, No. 33,
Norfolk-street, Strand, W.C., without becoming members
of the Society.
CHARLES LEWIS GRUNEISEN, Secretary.
Prospectuses of the Share, Deposit, Laud, and Building
Advance Departments will be sent free of charge.

LONDON and NORTII-WESTERN
_AuRAIL-
WAY.—On and after Monday, September 2, the
following EXPRESS TRAINS will be RUN between
MANCHESTER and LONDON, via the Potteries and
North Stafford Line :

Leavo Manchester (London road), 11.30 a.m. ; arrive
London (Euston Station), at 5.15 and 5.50 p.m.
Leave Manchester (London-road), 5.30 p.m. ; arrive
London (Euston Station), 10.45 p.m.
Leave London (Euston Station), 7.30 a.m. ; arrive Man-
chester (London-road) 12.30 p.m.
Leave London (Euston Station) 11.0 a.m. ; arrive Man-
chester (London-road) 4.20 p.m.
Third-class Arrangements.
Tho trains leaving:Manchester at 11.30 a.m., arriving in
London at 5.50 p.m., and that leaving London at 11.0 a.m.,
arriving in Manchester at 4.20 p.m., convey third-class
passengers.
By order,
W. CAWKWELL, General Manager,
Euston Station, London, August, 1867.

LONDON and NORTH-WESTERN RAIL-
WAY.—New Service of Trains between Kensing-
ton and Broad-street.—On and after Monday, September
2, a new service of TRAINS will run between KENSING-
TON and BROAD-STREET STATION, City, every
half-hour.

The trains will complete the journey in about 40 minutes,
and will call at Shoreditch, Dalston Junction, llighbury,
Camden-road, Hampstead-heath, and Willesden, and will
leave Kensington every half hour from 7.40 a.m., and
Broad-street Station every half hour from 7.40 a.m. until
9.10 p.m.
For further particulars see time tables.
By order,
W. CAIVKWELL, General Manager.
Euston Station, London, August, 1867.

LONDON AND NORTH-WESTERN
RAILWAY.

WARWICK RACES, 3rd and 4th September, 1867.

FIRST and SECOND CLASS RETURN TICKETS
issued at London (Euston, Broad-street, Dalston, Shore-
ditch, Kensington, Chelsea, Battersea, and Clapham Junc-
tion Stations) to LEAMINGTON and WARWICK, on
MONDAY, 2nd September, and intervening days, will be
available to Return by any Train (Irish and Limited Mails
excepted) from Warwick and Leamington to London, up
to and including Thursday, sth September.

TI C 5 .1.. N m
,:c1
* vs O• "ti c 0 . ~3 '4 5 f.'g 4
,0 A.:O c, c., , 6 Al, I, 0
N m (0 0.0 ''', c 0 I if: o o
-,3 2 5 ez .n -r° al ,-4 .:14
N d
,-I 0 0.“0 t. C. 4-C) I 040 CO F.
V) 0 0.0 NT2 SJo c, kr:
1,,,•• .3 g.n Lo ig...4
...,:.) 040 C- t'- ~.., C) 04.0 CO C.:
.-I
Nfr C:, 0, .0 N 7,), )lz c,
-
.0 04,, . if:: ,-1 0 P.,il .14 CO
N m N ,),
~ 0 0 C, .0
. - . IN
C )o, Lamm
2 ; 7: 4 '
' 2 et, ::
*.! vi gm C'', '-'1 * .ti :
~., C.) pi .1,1 CO C:
v-I
..3 d 4 g •-, c.-
. 0 d ;41 $71.14 N .-10 O.N N .0 0
0
.
ai 050 .0 N 4 5 2 52 1
~.rn 'a .1 ~.
4. _, 0 d o Ar-1 ,-1 • r-, o ce 71 7.1 ACI 1:,
I-I r-i M
.4 .0 !O•
Ts 5.55 0 .0 ,-,
14-.5 72 P
N NO. 0 0 .
,-.1 .0
E.-4 ..4
o.• N c:, (D Li- 0, P
m
.2 El 0.0 54 .4.1
0 b 3 ce El 3 •,:,
q -C) as NN ,-4 0 ct 0 0 O,N co
......., .-.1 .-I •.., .24
:t m 14 re
Ca 0 .0
;sr V% El 0 ~3 A 5 gl2 '52 g
:., c, t.... 0,-1 ...4 r-I 5. dOOCO AN A
"g.
Nro .0 .0 .0. N 2 0 2 .7i 2 Et;
, 5N C 0 ,:/' =23 :s
.-,U dtO :12, 4 -U d t,.• t••• 0
...
Nai •.0 NN
td sg a ,--.
,-,5 ci tg g,
• ,-,
- g
t t ;)
a)
2 t> 0,:,
~.7-.. > 4..
'.
..'
a) yea
ax cl PI . ,
0 0 a., 0 r.
'',
?:, t.' 1.. E.
c ••4
i-1 ./..:- ', , v. x
I ad ,9 ;.--., r:.': '- 2
z , -a 0
x
0 P 7 L.:
i-4 1.4 ..4 i-::

By order,
W. C A.WK NV ELL, General Manager.
Euston Station, August. 1867.

OSB ORNE'.3 STILTON

Is THE Cheese !

Anwsthesia," &c.,
A ESKELL, Surgeon Dentist, Author of
• "Dental surgery," "Pure Dentistry," "Dental
from Ten to Four o'clock, at his only residence,
may be consulted DAILY as hitherto

BOYS and their CLOTHING.— lIYAM & CO.,
66 and 67, OXFORD-STREET, W.
Nothing can possibly surpass the suitable Neatness,
Elegance, and Economy of the Clothing made by lIYAM
and CO. for Young Gentlemen, Boys and Youths. Tho
durability, adaptation to ngo, and superior fit, combined
with now improvements in stitching, braiding, &c., of the
following Garments must still further increase the reputa-
tion of IIYAM and CO.'S Establishment, so extensively
patronised by Parents, Guardians, and Schools from all
Parts of the Kingdom.

B°"' YOUTHS, and ELDER YOUTHS.

BOYS' PRINCE ALFRED OVERCOATS,
21s. to 455.

BO"' REEFERS and INVERNESS CAPES,
15s. 6d. to 355.

BOYS' VENTNOR OVERCOATS, 12s. to 30s•

BOYS' JACKETS for DRESS and UNDRESS,
12s. 6d. to 30s.

BOYS' KNICKERBOCKER suns, 15s. 6d.
to 425.

BOYS' VELVET KNICKERBOCKERS,
30s. to 50s.

BOYS' OSBORNE SUITS, 21s. t 4

BOYS' RUGBY SUITS, 255. to 455.

BOYS' HARROW SUITS, 21s. to 50s.

BOYS' WIMBLEDON SUITS, 40s. to 555.

BOYS' TROUSERS, Bs. 6d. to 203.

BOYS' VESTS, 4s. Gd. to 10s. Gd.

BOYS' HATS, CAPS, and UMBRELLAS.

BOYS' SHIRTS and HOSIERY.

HYAM & Co.'s SELECT DEPARTMENTS,
66 and 67, OXFORD-STREET.
The attention of Gentlemen is invited to the following.
arrangements into which HYAM and CO.'s Establishment
is laid out for public accommodation :
No. 1. Clothing for immediate Wear.
„ 2. Select Order Department.
„ 3. Juvenile and Youths' Department.
„ 4. Hat, Hosiery, and Outfit Department.
The most experienced cutters and workmen are em-
ployed, and the newest and best materials, with due regard
to economy, are guaranteed.

OLIN GO HELL and Co.'s CHERRY
cll TOO FR PASTE 1s greatly supe:tor to any tooth
powder; Ores the teeth a pearl whiteness, protects the
enamel from deoay, and imparts & pleasant tragraree to
the breath. ?doe te. fsd.—lted Bull Wharf, v 3, Upper
Thames-street, London.

TEET H. —Messrs. GABRIE L.
(ESTABLISHED 1•415).
NEW PAMPHLET, FREE BY POST FOR FOUR STAMPS,
Explaining the l':dniess System of Dentistry, and
self-adnesive Teeth with ,ut .prings,
AT 310DERATE eIIARGF.S.
*,,* 61, Luvt;A rE- HILT. CI rY, 3 Londan.
**oo, flarley-street, Cavendish •sq tre,
01, Duke-street, Liverpool.

would be a calamity to all nations. 'be United
States think it not only easier but more desirable
that Great Britain should acknowledge; and satisfy
the claims for indemnity which we have submitted,
than it would be to find an equal and wise arbitra-
tor who would consent to adjudicate them. If,
however, her Majesty's Government, for reasons
satisfactory to them, should prefer the remedy of
arbitration, the United States would not object.
The United States, in that case, would expect to
refer the whole controversy just as it is found in
the correspondence which has taken place between
the two Government, with such further evidence
and arguments as either party may desire,
without imposing restrictions, conditions, or limi-
tations upon the umpire, and without waiving
any principle or argument on either side. They can-
not consent to waive any question on the considera-
tion that it involves a point of national honour
and, on the other hand, they will not require that'
any question of national pride or honour shall be
expressly ruled and determined as such. If her
Majesty's Government shall concur in these views,
the President will be ready to treat concerning the
choice of an umpire."
In his reply to this despatch, dated March 9,
1867, Lord Stanley declines to go over the whole
ground traversed by Mr. Seward, but says :
"In my despatch of the 30th of November I ex-
plained to you the grounds on which her Majesty's
Government could not consent to refer to a foreign
Power to determine whether the policy of recognis-
ing the Confederate States as a belligerent Power
was or was not suitable to the circumstances of the
time when that recognition was made, but I at the
same time expressed the willingness of her Majesty's
Government to entertain in a friendly spirit any
proposal which might be made to them by the Go-
vernment of the United States, to refer to arbitra-
tion other questions which might be at issue between
the two Governments in reference to the late war,
and I desired you to invite Mr. Seward to state
what were the precise points which, in his opinion,
might be and ought to be so dealt with, Mr. Seward,
in his despatch of the 12th of January, while sug-
gesting that it would ' not only be easier but more
desirable that Great Britain should acknowledge and
satisfy the claims for indemnity which we have sub-
mitted, than it would be to find an equal and wise
arbitrator who would consent to adjudicate them,'
goes on to say that if her Majesty's Government
should prefer the remedy of arbitration, the United
States would not object, but in that case' would ex-
pect to refer the whole controversy just as it is found
in the correspondence which has taken place between
the two Governments, with such further evidence and
arguments as either party may desire, without im-
posing restrictions, conditions, or limitations upon
the umpire, and without waiving any principle or
argument on either side.' To such an extensive
and unlimited reference her Majesty's Govern-
ment cannot consent; for this reason, among others,
that it would admit of, and indeed compel, the sub-
mission to the arbiter of the very question which I
have already said they cannot agree to submit. The
real matter at issue between the two Governments,
when kept apart from collateral considerations, is,
whether in the matters connected with the vessels
out of whose depredations the claims of American
citizens have arisen the course pursued by the British
Government, and by those who acted under its
authority was such as would involve a moral respon-
sibility on the part of the British Government to
make good, either in whole or in part, the losses of
American citizens. This is a plain and simple ques-
tion, easily to be considered by an arbiter, and ad-
mitting of solution without raising other and wider
issues ; and on this question hor moicaty's ouvern-
ment are fully prepared to go to arbitration, with
the further provision that if the decision of the
arbiter is unfavourable to the British view, the exa-
mination of the several claims of citizens of the United
States shall be referred to a mixed commission, with
a view to the settlement of the sums to be paid on
them. But as they consider it of great importance
for the maintenance of good understanding between
the two countries, that the adjudication of this
question in favour of one or other of the parties
should not leave other questions of claims in which
their respective subjects or citizens may be interested,
to be matter of further disagreement between the
two countries. Her Majesty's Government, with a
view to the common interest of both, think it neces-
sary, as you have already apprised Mr. Seward in
your letter of the 7th of January, ' in the event of
an understanding being come to between the two
Governments, as to the manner in which the special
American claims' (which have formed the subject
of the correspondence of which my present despatch
is the sequel) ' should be dealt with, that, under a
convention to be separately, but simultaneously con-
cluded, the general claims of the subjects and
citizens of the two countries arising out of the
events of the late war should be submitted to a
mixed Commission, with a view to their eventual
payment by the Government that may be judged
responsible for them.' Such, then, is the proposal
which her Majesty's Government desire to submit to
the Government of the United States--limited re-
ference to arbitration in regard to the so-called Ala-
bama claims, and adjudication by means of a mixed
Commission of general claims. You will read this
despatch to Mr. Seward and furnish him with a copy
of it, as the deliberate reply of her Majesty's Go-
vernment to his despatch of the 12th of January,
and in doing so you will express to him the earnest
hope of her Majesty's Government that their present
proposal will be accepted by the Cabinet of Wash-
ington in the spirit in which it is made."
The two following despatches of Lord Stanley
complete the correspondence :
" Foreign-office, May 2, 1867.

"Sir,—Mr. Adams has this day communicated to
me the substance of a despatch which he had re-
ceived from Mr. Seward in reply to the proposal
which you were instructed by my despatch of the
9th of March to make on the subject of the claims
arising out of the civil war in the United States. In
this despatch Mr. Seward states that the Govern-
ment of the United States adhere to the view which
they formerly expressed as to the best way of deal-
ing with these claims. They cannot, consequently,
consent to a special and peculiar limitation of
arbitrament in regard to the Alabama claims such
as her Majesty's Government suggest. They cannot
give any preference to the Alabama claims over
others in regard to the form of arbitrament sug-
gested ; and while they agree that all mutual claims
which arose during the civil war between citizens
and subjects of the two countries ought to be
amicably and speedily adjusted, they must insist
that they be adjusted by one and the same form of
tribunal, with like and the same forms, and on prin-
ciples common to all. The President of the United
States, therefore, respectfully declines the proposals
of her Majesty's Government ; but reciprocating
the feelings of goodwill which have been expressed
on the part of Great Britain, the United States'
Government will cheerfully receive any further sug-
gestions that her Majesty's Government may have
to offer.—l am, &c., " STANLEY."
" Foreign-office, May 24, 1867.
Sir,—I abstain in my despatch of the 2d inst.
from making any observations on the communi-
cation from Mr. Aeial to which that despatch
referred, in the expectation that I might receive
from you some furthcr explanation, as given to
you by Mr. Seward of the views of the American
Government on the subjeci!-. Not having heard from
you, I must conclude that IVii. Seward has not made
you acquainted with the nature of his reply sent
through Mr. Adams to your com]nunciation to him
of my despatch of the 9th March. I have nothing,
therefore, beyond the brief statement made to me
by Mr. Adams to guide me in dealing with Mr.
Seward's reply. In that reply Mr. Seward says
clearly enough that the Government of the United
States cannot consent to a special and peculiar
limitation of arbitration in regard t 4 the, Alabama