The Sun.
London, England, 1803-02-14 00:00:00

CORN EXCHANGE, Fss.. 4.

WI have scarce any arrivals to-day, being 'so
early after the frost ; the Market is dull, and Wheat
has no alteration in price; Barley is in. plenty ;
and Malt as our last ; a goad quantity of Pease ; in
them and Beans tve see no dilCial1011; Oats are
getting Something lower,; last prices of Flour re-
main.

..,.....__ _
Whep 451 a Sts aos ad Tick 13W% ~ aSs a 33s od
Fine ditto -00 s al)is ad Oats - • iss a Ifis :as
llarley - 225 II 27S 0,1 l'oland ditto 22$ a 23s 64
Malt - - ,fry,fryß 463 oil RapoSeed . - 30 a 341
Kyc - ' • 336 a. 36 611 Fine Hour 1 45$ It 50s od
White POS. 33* a 39s 64 Sgsi9p44l9 • 4-'6 a 45$
Deana - 31$ a 344 44

L. 4 07 REPORT.

CL)I:T KING'S BENCH, Fi.a.

• Mr. Ct. .Froik 6 moved cot stave to file a Crimi-
nal Information against JOHN BAR B E it, Esq. Mes-
senger Of the Great Seal, and Colonel Wool:, Mem-
ber of Parliament for the Borough of Gatton, on an
allegation in an Affidavit, that they had concluded
themselves contrary to the express provisions .of the
Statute of the 7th and Bth of William 111. which
expressly required, that after the Sr EA ICE R shall issue
his warrant to the Clerk of the Crown for a new
writ for the Eledion of a Member to serve for any
place in Parliament, the precept shall within three
days be delivered to the Returning Officer of the
place, instead of which, this Gentleman, he said,
had delivered this precept to Colonel Wood, who
had said, the'Botough was his own, and he had kept
it for twenty days before he delivered it to the Re-
turning Officer of the Borough.

The Court observed, that here was no state-
ment of any thing being done from any corrupt
motives whatever, and therefore the Court would
not interfere in this extraordinary manner. If
there was any thing in the case that was illegal,
the party moving, might resort to the ordinary re-
medies of the Law.—Motion refused.

SATURDAY, FEB. 12.

CUTHBERT fV. SWINEY.

TIM was a rule calling on the Plaintiff to shew
cause why the judgment signed in this case, and the
execution levied, should not be set aside, and why
the money taken under that execution, now in the
hands of the Sheriff, should not be delivered to the
Defendant, upon the ground that the Warrant of
Attorney, given by the Defendant to the Plaintiff,
for securing the payment of tool. borrowed of the
Plaintiff by the Defendant, was founded upon the
most griping usury, and that the judgment had
been entered up, long before it was agreed between
the parties that it should be so, &c. • .
Mr. ERMINE, in sheaving cause against the rule,
observed that it had been obtained by means of the
most infamous perjury, for that every one material
circumstance in the Defendant's affilavit, was Duly
denied by the affidavit of the Plaintiff, and in this
the Plaintiff was confirmed by another, who joined.
in,the affidavit. Mr. EastciNF was proceeding.. to
state the circumstances of the case, when •

Mr. GARRow observed, that be kid seen the
affidavit on which his Learned Friend was sliming
cause. His ohjed was to save the time of the
Court. He was aware that if the whole of the
affidavit was gone through, the result would be that
this rote would be discharged; upon which the rule
was discharged with COSt9:

Mr. GARROW moved for a rule to slew cause
why a Plaintiff bhould not give security for costs,
on the ground that he was a native of France ; that he
came over to..this country, and was now residing here
merely for the purpose of superintending his cause,
and that after it was determined he was expected to
return immediately, so that if the Defendant ob.
tair3ed a verdift, he would have no means to secure
his costs, because the Plalqtiir might be gone out
of the jutisdittion of the Court.
Mr. ERSKINE said, that the Defendant might
find the Plaintiff in this cause at the house of the
French Ambassador.
Lord ELLENBOROUGH observed, that, the
tiff was now resident in this country, and no case
had gone so far as to determine, that because he had
another residence, he shall give security for costs
and therefore the motion could not be supported.—
Rule refused.