The Sun.
London, England, 1858-01-09 00:00:00

9. RE SUN,' LONDON,", SATITOD Al 7 'EVEN ING, JANUARY 9, 18N8,

son or persons pretending interest in such real estate ;
and the judge on being satisfied by affidavit that the
will in question does affect or purport to affect the real
estate, shall make an order authorising the person ap•
plying to cite the heir or heirs at law or other such
person or persons as aforesaid : Provided always that
the judge may
make any special directions as to the
persons to be cited which he may think the justice of
the case requires.
35. An application for a new trial may be made to the
Court of Probate in respect to causes tried before a
jury within ten days from the day on which the cause
was tried, or on the first sitting of the court after the
cause has been tried.
36. An application for a rehearing of any case tried
before the judge without a jury, and in which evidence
is given vivavoce, may be made within ten days from the
day on which the same was heard, or at the first sitting
of the court after the cause has been heard.
37. If the plaintiff or defendant in any cause, unless
by leave of the judge previously obtained, fail to deliver
the declaration, plea, or other pleading within the time
specified in these rules, the other party in the cause shall
not be compelled to receive the same, unless by direc-
tion of the judge. The expense of every such application
to the judge shall fall on the party who caused the delay.
38. Citations, notices, and other processes heretofore
in use and still in use, are to be inserted in the London,
Gazette, and in such of the leading morning and evening
papers, and such local papers as the judge may from
time to time direct, instead of being served on the Royal
Exchange.
30. Where a special time is limited for filing affidavits,
no affidavit filed after that time shall be used in court,
unless by leave of the judge.
40. In contentious business, inventories, and not
merely declarations of personal estate and effects of the
deceased, are to be need, unless by order of the judge.
The form of inventory is given, No. 28.
41. All notices required by these rules, or by the
practice of the court, are to be in writing.

of the testator will be sufficient to entitle the paper to
probate.
21. If the will, codicil, or testamentary paper is signed
at the end of it by the testator, and attested by one wit.
ness only, and there is nothing to show the testator's
intention that it should be attested by a second witness,
the affidavit of one disinterested person to prove the
signature to be of the handwriting of the testator will be
sufficient to entitle the paper to probate.
22. The circumstance of a person being named as an
executor in the will, codicil, or testamentary paper, or
being interested as a legatee or as the husband or wife
of a legatee under such will, codicil, or testamentary
paper, rendered him incompetent to become an attesting
NS limes' to it, so that if the name of a peroon 99
interested appears as that of a subscribing witness to
the will or testamentary paper, the same, so far as
regards hisattestation, must be considered as unattested,
and his evidence in support thereof will be inadmissible,
unless he shall first release his interest thereunder.
23. If an attestation clause, or the word " witnesses,'
appear written at the foot of the paper, the same being
unattested, or if the paper purport on the face of it to
b 3 a drift of a will, the copy of a will, or instructions
for a will, it must prima facie be considered as an in-
complete paper, and not, save under special circum-
stances, entitled to probate.
24. Any appearance of an attempted cancellation of
a paper by burning, tearing, obliteration, or otherwise,
must be accounted for.

25. Every faet leading to a presumption of abandon
meat tr revocation of a paper on the part of the testator
must be accounted for.

26. Alterations and interlineations made by the testa-
tor, if unattested, are to be proved by an affidavit of two
persons to his handwriting. If the same are in the
handwriting of any person other than the testator, it
will suffice to prove by affidavit that they were known
to and approved of by the testator. Proof by affidavit
that they existed in the paper at the time it was found
in the repositories of the testator recently after hie death
may, under circumstances, suffice. Alterations and
interlineations made since the 31st of December, 1837,
are subject to the provisions of 1 Yict., c. 36.
27. With respect to deeds, papers, memoranda, or
other documents mentioned in a testamentary paper, or
appearing to have been annexed or attached thereto, the
foregoing rules, orders, and instructions as to wills bear-
ing date since the 31st Dec., 1837, will apply.
28. A will made before the let of Jan., 1838, is con-
firmed by a codicil duly executed bearing date on or
after that day.

order that he may determine whether it will be expe-
dient to interfere on the part of the crown ; save and
except that when the deceased is domiciled within the
duchy of Lancaster, notice is to be given to the solicitor
for the duchy in London ; and no grant is to be issued
until that officer has signified the course it will be proper
to take under the circumstances of each particular case.
63. The registrars are to take care that the copies of
wills to be annexed to the probate or letters of adminis-
tration are fairly and properly written in the engroF sing
hand heretofore in use in the Prerogative Court, and are
to reject those which are otherwise.

From the London Gazette of Last Night.

LORD CILMBERLAIN'S OFFICE, JAN. 8.

Notice is hereby given that the Solemnization of the
Marriage of Her Royal Highness the Princess Royal with
His Royal Highness Prince Frederic William Nicolas
Charles of Prussia, will take place on Monday the 25th
instant.

LORD CHAMBERLAIN'S OFFICE, JAN. 8.
Notice is hereby given that Her Majesty will hold a
Drawing Room at St. James's Palace, on Saturday, the
30th inst., at two o'clock.
There will ba no presentations to Her Majesty upon this
occasion.

bury, Jan, 19, at three, and Feb. 19, at eleven, at the
Court of Bankruptcy.
William Tabby, cheesemonnr, Great Castle-street, Ca-
vendish-square, Jan. 21, at eleven, and Feb. 16, at twelve,
at tho Court of Bankruptcy.
. . _

James Metcalfe and Christopher Metcalfe, tailors, Rich-
mond, Yorkshire, Jan. 26 and Fob. 23, at eleven, at the
Leeds District Court.

Pain Arnold, manufacturer, Manchester, Jan. 25, and
Feb. 15, at eleven, at the Manchester District Court.
William Hancock, builder, Manchester, Jan. 19, and
Feb. 16, at one, at the Manchester District Court.
John Stuart, coffeehouse-keeper, Wigan, Jan. 19 and
Feb. 9, at twelve, at the Manchester District Court.
Mowbray Lookap, banker, Staindrop, Jan. 14,
at half-past eleven, and March 4, at twelve, at the
Newcastle-upon-Tyne District Court.
In the matter of Groux's Improved Soap Company
(Limited), the Commissioner has appointed Tuesday, Feb.
2, at the Court of Bankruptcy, for the settlement of the
affairs of this company.
James Parker and James Ronald, commission agents,
Bread-street, Jan. 20, at half-past eleven, and March 1, at
one, at the Court of Bankruptcy.
John Bullen, butcher, Leather-lane, Holborn, Jan. 18,
at one, and March 1, at twelve, at the Court of Bank-
ruptcy.
Thomas Butler, licensed victualler, Priory-road, Wands-
worth-road, Jan. 20, at nalf-past one, and March 1, at
eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy.
Andrew Thompson Honeyman Dalziel, licensed victual-
ler, Liverpool, Jan. 15 and Feb. 11, at eleven, at the Liver-
pool District Court.
William Oxlade, coal merchant, York, Jan. 26 and Feb.
23, at half-past eleven, at the Commer4ial-buildings,
Leeds. _ _ _

James Moorhouse, cotton spinner, Howgill, Yorkshire,
Jan. 26 and Feb. 22, at twelve, at the Commercial-build-
ings, Leeds.
Chatburn Cockcroft, picker maker, Stansfield, Halifax,
Jan. 19, at half-past eleven, and Feb. 16, at eleven, al
the Leeds Disti ict Court.

Thomas Oliver and Andrew Oliver, lace manufacturers,
Nottingham, Jan. 21, and Feb. 9, at half-past ter, at the
Shirehall, Nottingham.
Tom Smith and William Fletcher, commission agents,
Bradford, Jan. 21 and Feb. 19, at eleven, at the Leeds
District Court.

Edmund Cockshott and John Cookshott, worsted manu-
facturers, Bradford, Jan. 28 and Feb. 26, at eleven, at the
Leeds District Court.

John Mayor Brown, apothecary, Kineton, Warwick-
shire, Jan. 21 and Feb. 11, at half-past eleven, at the
Birmingham District Coma.
Joseph Thompson, jun., plumber, Dudley, Worcester-
shire, Jan. 20 and Feb. 10, at half-past ten, at the Bir-
mingham District Court.
Edward R. Daunt and Brother, general merchants, Liver-
pool, Jan. 15 and Feb. 11, at eleven, at the Liverpool Dis-
trict Court.

James Laidlaw, insurance broker, Liverpool, Jan. 26
and Feb. 23, at twelve, at the Liverpool District Court.
SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS.

John Moffat, tanner and currier, Annan.
Chappell and Anderson, brick-makers, Glasgow.
William Russell, grocer, Glasgow.
Cay, Ogilvie, and Company, merchants, Leith.
Donald M`Glashan, wine merchant, Edinburgh.
Alexander Mitchell, manufacturer, Glasgow.
James Morrison, innkeeper, Port Elphinatone, Aber•
deenshire.
Robert Philp, builder, Glasgow.

supposed to have been killed—no account of him since the
mutiny at Delhi took place.
Mr. 11. N. Settle, Sub-Conductor, Delhi, May 11, 1357
supposed to have been killed—no account of him since the
mutiny at Delhi took place. No. 5.
Mr. George Connor, Sub-Conductor, Delhi, May 11,
1857, supposed to have been killed— no account of him
since th 3 mutiny at Delhi took place.
Sergeant Isaac Hoyle, Park-Sergeant, Delhi, May 11,
1857, killed by Sepoys while proceeding to the magazine.
No. /.

_
Mr. Geoffry Coleman, Conductor, Allahahad, June 22,
1357, died of wounds by insurgents.
Mr. Nicholas Reilly, Assistant Commissary of Ordnance,
Cawnpore, June, 1857, supposed to have been killed, no
account having been received of him since the station has
been reoccupied.
Mr. George H. Manvi..l, Officiating Sub-Conductor,
Cawnpore, Juno, 1857, supposed to have been killed, no
account having been received of him since the station has
been reoccupied.

Mr. Richard Saunders, Magazine-Sergeant, Cawnpore,
June, 1857, supposed to have been killed, no account hav-
ing been received of him since the station has been re-
occupied. No. 11.
Mr. Matthew Jones, Conductor and Engineer, Putty-
glint- June, believed to have been killed at Futtyghnr, or
on the river between that station and Cawnpore, but no
account has been received of him.
Mr. Michael Rohan, Conductor, Futtyghur, June, be-
lieved to have been killed at Futtyghur, or on the river
between that station and Cawnpore, but no account has
been received of him.
Mr. Patrick Hammond, Sub-Conductor and Assistant-
Engineer, Futtyghur, June, believed to have been killed at
Futtyghur, or on the river between that station and Cawn-
pore, but no account has been received of him.
The wives and children of all the warrant and non-com-
missioned officers have been killed, with exception to Nos.
5,7, and 11.

A. ABBOTT, Colonel,
Inspector-General of Ordnance and Magazines.
Fort William, Ordnance Office,
Nov, 11, 1857.