The Sun.
London, England, 1858-07-29 00:00:00

THE stlN LONnOM T-
v
TEURt,D T. v F. IN G, 3 C O9, 18.5 8.

L LEAS',

A it:EN TA 1,7,

LA •f/ INTFAL LI GENGE.—aiiis )

! the pr t,c-ner Inv house and called fora pit of
ball and halt. Ho was intoxicated, and I reth,-ed to
serve him with ail, at d ti 1 l him he had bad enough.
The prisoner insisted on being, stuppiied with malt liqu,,r
and swore at me. I told him to leave my h,use, which
he refused to do, and uued the most odious I,notage.
He rept,atediy called me a --, and &taller gi-d 11. e to
fight. I laid hold of him and turned him oat of my
house. He came back again, made acol her disturbance,
and I attempted to turn him out again ; be then struck
me a violent blow on the mouth and cut my lip. I
seized him again, and detained him until a police con-
stable came up.
The prisoner, who said he was a sailor, and had been
upon a two months' cruise on shore, pleaded drunken-
ness.

Px,..l

AlLwAste

Leasin.
Comu,mie,

gem, I'ric.
ytsterda

'Mines
this da).

VIOE-CEIANCELLOAS. COURT.
Vic.--Cliancelllr Sir W. Pa., W:,00.)
IN RE ASKEW -ASKEW V. THOMPSON JUDGMENT.

Clyeles,l?. e •)c.
Col.Stour V 7.
E.Ln. g. 6 p.
E. Un. H. Sh.
Glss. Barr. di
Neila,Direct.
Do. 1,7,m
Glstr.Br,Dn.Fr
Hull dr Selb
Do. A Sharee
Do. I Shares
Lon.&Greenw
Do.Preferonce
Lon. Tit., &S.
Do. Bark. Sh.
Manch.Bxton.
and Matlock
Mdld. Bradfd.
Newmarket
BuryE.G.spc.
N.&Est.s p.c.
Do. 6 per et
Do. Fixed sp. c
Prest. & Wyre
IDo. Shrs.
Roystn.d; Hit.
Shrows.Bz Her
S. Staffordsh
jWearVal.g6pc
Do

Ln.!zN.

(it. Nordin'
E. Count.

Hie Honour the Vic ti livening judg-
ment, eaid that the only point that he bad to consider
was, whether, under the will of the testatrix, Mrs.
Thompson, which directed her executors to pay all her
brother's debts (who had predeceased the testatrix forty
years before the date of her will), whether interest was
due upon his debts from the date of his decease till the
death of the testatrix.

Caldonian.
Do.
Gt. Westn.
Y. & N.M
Do
Do
S. Eastern
Do

His Honour, on considering the terms of the will,
came to the cot:tem-don that no interest was intended to
be paid by the testatrix upon the debts due by her
brother between the date of his and her decease. Tbat
she directed her executors to pay his debts only, with-
out interest:. He ordered the payment of her brother's
debts due at the time of his death, with interest at four
per cent. per year after the date of the testatrix's death.
The costs of all parties to be paid out of the testatrix's
estate.

Mr. Yardley : You are fined 20s.
The penalty was paid.

Peto SCo 1
Do

Ln. dtN. W
dt Midld.

GOODWOOD RACES.—(This Day.)

E. Count
Do
Do
Do

(BY ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH)
ZETLAND STAKES.

Star of the East...
EIGHTH BENTINCK MEIVIORIAL STAKES.
Rainbow 1
Clarence

L. 41‘1%.
Do
Gt.Nortfinl
T. Brassey
M. MClean
Stk. &Dar
Do

COURT OF DIVORCE.
(Before Sir C. Cresswell, Judue Ordinary.)
WELLS V. WELLS- JUDGMENT.

Five ran.

WiltsclrSomrst!

!Gt. Wostn.

This was a suit; instituted by the husband against the
wife for a judicial separation, on the ground of adultery.
It appeared that the parties were married in October,
1847, when the wife was only 16 years of age. Two
children were born ; one in February, 1850, and the
other in 1853. In March, 1850, George Wells, the
husband, who was a builder, went to America, and re-
turned in July of the same year, after which they lived
together in several places, and in 1854 they resided at
Peckham grove. A. person named Thomas Berryman
was employed by this husband making drawings for him,
and was acquainted with the wife. Frequent quarrels
took place between the husband and wife, and in May,
1854, she left her husband's house with her two children
and went to her mother's residence, at Kenning-
ton-cross, and remained there two or three months.
During the time taomas Berryman temporarily re-
sided there, and then it was that the alleged
adultery was committed ; but if the cause rested
on the evidence ie. support U. this part of the alle
gation, the learned judge said he should have had great.
difficulty in satisfying his mind that the charge of adul-
tery had been proved ; but there was another charge of
adultery against the wife with Thomas Wildman (whom
the wife represented to the servant first as her cousirs
and then a friend in the Customs), particularly in 1856,
at the husband's house. The parties were seen walking
and talking together near the house, and Wildman also
visited her during her husband's absence. They had alao
visited Cremorne-gardens together, and the evidence of
the servant went to prove acts of adultery between the
parties. It was alleged that the husband knew of Wild-
man's visits, and was agreeable to them, but there was
evidence to the contrary, because the husband on nee
occasion broke a stick over Wildman's head in order
to keep him away in future. Wi dman, by letter,
threatened to take proceedings against the husband for
the assault, but he never oarried it out. After referring
to the details of the case, the learned judge said he was
bound under the circumstances to decree the judicial
separation asked for.

ABRIVED.—PaIm Leaf.

LATEST BETTING.

GOODWOOD CUP.

7to 4 agat Ventre St. G►ia (taken)
6 to 1 agst Fisherman (taken)
6to 1 agst Saunterer (offered)
7to 1 agat Arsenal ( ffered)
10 to 1 agst any other (offered)

DERBY.

25 to 1 agst Promised Land (in force) (taken)

MARKET NEWS.—(This oa3 )

CORN EXCHANGE.

GENERAL AVERAGE PRICES OF BRITISH CORN
For the week ended July 29, HA made up from the Re-
turns of the Inspectors in the different Cities and Towns i❑
England and Wales, per Imperial Quarter.

WHEAT I BARLEY OATS RYE BRANS PEAS
46s 4d 29s 9d 27811 d 35s 4d 44s 4d 44511 d

THE SIX WEEKS' AVERAGES.
wuP,AT BARLEY OATS RYE BEANS 1 PEAS
443 id 30s 5d 26s 6d 31s 4d 42s 10d 43s 6

ENGLISH GRAIN SOLD LAST WEEK
Wheat, 91,917; barley, 1,301; oats, 4,454 ; rye, 48;
beans, 1,487 ; peas, 173 qn.aters.

Judgment acc,rdingly.
On a question of costs,

Tae learned Judge observed that be thought there
was sufficient evidenca to show there was a miserable
conspiracy to entrap the husband into a condonation of
the conduct of the wife, and granted the npplication.

CARGILL V. CARGILL - JUDGMENT -ISIPORTANT

POINT.

This was a petition for judicial separation, promoted
by the wife against the husband, on the ground of de-
sertion without cause for more than two years. The
husband did not appear. The parties were married on
7th June, 1348, and in December, 1850, the linsbani
sent his wife to her father, with a letter accusing her of
misc induct, of which no evidence was given, and de-
clining to live with her again. Shortly after he quitted
England for Australia, and the wife heard nothing of
him till March last, when she recerved a letter from him
dated from an hotel in London, requesting her to live
with him again. The wife returned no answer to the
letter, but filed her petition, and the question was,
whether the wife's right to relief by the statute was
taken away by that refuml. After referring to the law.
the learned Judge considered the wife was not deprived
of that relief, and he decreed for judicial separation.
Judgment accordingly.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.
(Before Mr. Commie-inner Face.)
THE ROYAL SURREY GARDENS.

Mr. Chester appeared ou behalf of the parish officers
of St. Mary, Newington, fa. his Honour to make an
order upon Mr. Carman, the receiver, under the wind-
ing up of the affalra of the company, to pay the amount
of rates due in respect of the aboard gardens.
Mr. Carman said that he had no money in band out of
which he could pay it; besides be objected to the claim
for it was almost like ra log an empty house, for the
receipts did not much exceed the tent, and the premises
were rated at 1,280/. a year.
Mr. Chester said that the assignees had ha I a 1 the
benefit they could fxwe'. Tilt;) bad appealed azainst
the rental, wbic had been reduced from 1,5001. t,

1,200/. A:3 to Mr. Cannan not having any money, that
gentleman had not expl Lined himself. The property
had been sold for, he understood, 13.0001., and he had
received a deposit of 1,500/.
Mr. Cannan said that was the fact, but it was the
property of the mortgagee.
Mr. Chester said that the property could not be c.illed
unproductive when Mr. Sputwou paid at the rate of
700/. a year for the use of it on Sundays.
His Honour did not see that he had any power to
make any order in the case—it was a matter for Op-
assignees to administer the as,ets as they were g .t in ;
there was no proof that any monies had been received
which were availabie for the payment of the latei.
Mr. Jones, for the assignees, said they had none,
and if Mr. Cannan was called upon to pay it it must be
done by his own bankers. The proper course was for
the parish to apply to the magistrates for a distress-
warratt and seize for the rates.
Mr. Chewer said that would he of no use, for the
assignees had sold all that could have been distrained
On.

Hie Honour repeated that hs had no power to make
the order, and did not see why he should have been
appealed to.
Mr. Chester said the application had been made out
of respect for the court before adopting other proceed-
ings.

The application was refuged.
IN RE BERGER.
This bankrupt was ed as of Queen's Head-
court, Newgate-street, bookseller, and to-day cam-, up
and paused on accounts prepared by Messrs. Hart
Brothers.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.—(This Day.)

MARLBOROUGH-STREET.
CHARGE OF ASSAULT AGAINST A SON.—A BRUTAL
YATIER.—John Cbarleis Cooper, a respectable-looking
young man, was charged with his mother, Ann Cooper,
with committing an assault on John Ackland Cooper, a
wheelwright, at Whitcombe-street, a dissirated-lookkg
than.

The prosecutor said that on the previous evening he
was lying io bed when the male prisoner and another
son came in and struck and kicked him violently all over,
pulled him shout by his hair, and on a previous occasion
had beaten him black and blue. He did not wish to say
anything against his wife, and if his son would promise
not to molest him he would be satisfied.
In answer to Mr. Beadon, the son said his father was
always drunk, and did nothing whatever towards the
support of his family. He was in the continual habit
of beating his mother, who ;las then covered with
bruises. On the previous day he was fetched by a
widow who lived in the same house, who told him his
father was smashing all the things. He got up to the
bed, where his father PT then lying, and having bad
some words with him, his father jobbed a fork into hi-
face,
he was sorry rrissoeyye. He owned he was quick-tempered,
and to say that he struck his father in re-
turn, but only one 'low. Tie (the son) was going into
business, and his father !vas aggravated because he
would not take him with Into,
Mrs. Edwards, a widow, Was called, and, in addition
to confirming the principal portion of the son's state-
ment, said the father was inFesaantly ill-using his wife,
and she had on several occasions afforded her protection
from his violence. His ennd.uct was so violent that she
(witness) was frightened of loin.
Mr. Beadon said, after that he should discharge the
accu4ed ; at the same time be would recommend the son
to take his mother away with him.
The son said he certainly should do so.

THAMES.
THE DIVORCE AND MATRIMONIAL CAUSES ACT —A
respectable womap, about 30 years of age, who gave the
name of Margaret Smith, and said she was the wife cf
Richard Smith, formerly a c ,achman and omnibus
driver, and now a timekeeper, applied to Mr. Yardley
for an order for the protection of her property again t
the interference and desi4na df her husband.
The applicant eaid her husband deserted her eight
years ag.), and she had frequently taken out warrants
against Rim for ill-using her. She bal amassed a little
property by her own industry, and her husband had
from her. She hoped, under
the magistrate
agistrate would put the Act of
theth r e
circumstances,a threatened t o ta k e it away
Parliament in operation in her favour.
Mr. Yardley said he had great pleasure in giving the
applicant an order.
VIOLENT ASSAULT ON A Pt BLICAN.--Jamee Wills, a
tall, rough-looking fellow, was brought before Mr.
Yardley, charged with assaulting Mr. James Flowers,
the landlord of the Prince of Wales public-house, in
North-street, Bow,
Mr. Flewere laid, yesterday evening, at six o'clock,

LIPE.RIAL PAR LIA.ASiii T.

-

HOUSE OF LORDS. —(YEsTERDAY.)

Lord REDESDALE, in lb,. absence of the Lf.rd Chan-
took hid treat on the woolsack at 20 minutes to
five.

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. BILL.
On the 'notion of the Earl of Derby it was agreed
that
Vie Commons' reasons for disagreeing to their lord-
ships amendments should be printed and taken int,
consideration to-morrow.—Agreed to.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BILL.
On the motion that this hill, which was read a third
time yesterday, do pass, several amendments were made,
the divisions upon which occupied a considerable time.
The Eatl of DERBY protested against so many
amendments being made to a bill in its last stage.
Tne proper time for tvialtt▪
,g amendments was in com-
mittee or on the recepti▪ in of the report, and not up •ri
the third reading..Ele hoped the proceedings of that
evening would not be drawn into precedent.
After a few worts from Lord MoNTzAanE,
Toe motion was agreed to and the bill passed,
. The Railway Cheap Trains Bill was read a third time
and passed.
The Cornwall Submarine Mines Bill was read a third
time and passel.
The report of amendments to the Art Unions Act
Amendment Bill was brought up and received.
The repo: t ~f amendments to the Reformatory Schools
(Ire!and) Bill was received.
CLERIC OF PETTY SESSIONS (IRELAND) BILL.
This bill was read a third time and passed.
METROPOLIS LOCAL MANAGEMENT ACT.

The house tht.n went into committee on this bill.
Two new clauses ,4 ere proposed, which were ordered
to be printed and considered on the third reading.
Toe Drafts on .Bankers Law Amendment, the Civil
Bill, &c. (Ireland) Act, Amendment, and the New Writs
bills passed through committee.
BEER HOUSES.

The Bishop of OXFORD asked the noble earl at the
head of the Government whether he could hold out any
hope whatever that the attention of the Government
would be directed to the law which regulated the salt•
of beer. The present law was working very badly,
and directly opposite to what was oriy.inally intended
by the framers of the hill. In the event of it not being,
the intention of the Government to do so, he should
next session of Parliament himself introduce a bill on
the subject,

The Earl of DERBY said the attention of the Go-
vernment bad already ben directed to the subj et, and
a bill had been drawn out, but it hal been deemed ad
visable to postpone it till the next session.
Their lordships then adjourned.