The Sun.
London, England, 1858-07-13 00:00:00

theee resolutions, if agreed to, would be considered as
those of the whole house, and the extent to which the
Government was responsible for them was endorsed by
the announcement on the part of the noble earl at the
head of the Government, of his intention to propose cer-
tain amendments in them. The Government, in making
these concessions, ought to have done so freely, gra-
ciously, and ungrudgingly, rather than in the manner
which had been adopted. He looked upon the hypocrisy
of those reselutione, in the face cf what the Government
had done with respect to this bill, as most discreditable
to ihe House of Lords. (gear.)
The Duke of NEWCASTLE said that be bad heard
the speech of the noble lord who had last addressed the
house with great credit, for up to the present time there
bad been no display whatever of anything like acrimo-
nious feeling. (Hear.) He thought that great allowance
ought to be made to noble lords who had supported the
Government from the position in which they were placed,
and the greatest credit was duo to the noble earl at the
head of the Government for the sacrifices which had
been made by him in order to bring about a settlement
of this long-vexed question. (Hear. hear.) He thought
it would have been better that the question should have
been postponed than that an imperfect measure should
be introduced.

Reasons 1,2, and 3 were agreed t).
Their lordships then divided on the ptrendmtnt pro-
posed by the Earl of Derby to be substituted for the 4th
clause—.
Contents
Non-content
Mr.j,rity
Thd sth reason was agreed to, and the 6th struck out.
The reinain;ng reasons were agreed to.
STANHOPE AND WOLSINGHAM RECTORIES

BILL.
This bill paved through cotnrnittee.
ECCLESIASTICAL CORPORATIONS LEASING

BILL.
This bill passed through committee.
FUNDED DEBT BILL.

This bill also went through the same stage.
JOINT STOCK COMPANIES ACT AMEND-
MENT BILL.
This bill was read a thir3 time and passed.
THE JEW BILL.

Tile Earl of LUCAN moved the third reading of
this bill.
The Earl of GALLOWAY entered his protest
against the third reading, declaring that he had never
been a party to any compromise to admit the Jews to
Parliament. There might be subjects on which it would
be welt to listen to the plea of "expediency," but this
was not one of them. The country, he believed, was in
favour of the Jews being excluded from Parliament.
(Hear, hear.) He moved that the bill be read a third
time that day six months.
L-rd DUNGANNON also strenuously opposed the-
bill. By admitting those who denied the divinity of our
Saviour, the prayers now offered up at the commence-
ment iof 'their deliberations would belittle better than
a mock.,--ry.
Lora COLCHESTER (who spoke from one of the
Ministerial benches below the gangway) trusted that the
noble lord would not press his motion for rejecting the
till to a division.

Their lordships then divided
Contents for the third reading 33
Non-contents
Maj city —l2
... .

On the question tl-at the hill do pass,
A NoBLE LORD gave notice of a clause providing
that no resclation for admittiog the Jews to Parliament
should be moved in either house without due notice in
compliance with the standing orders.
Lord REDESDALE deprecated any interference with
the forms of proceeding of the other house. The noble
lord moved Its an amendment that no Jew contractor
should be at liberty to sit in Parliament.
L-rd LYNDHURST said that if no resolutions were
passed in the House of Commons the Jews would be
placed in a worse position than they were at present.
The Earl of DERBY hoped his noble friend would not
proceed with his clause. (Hear.) It would not be wise to
trench upon the tree action of the other house. On the
other hand, there could be no danger of any surprise.
Lord RED ESDAL E consented not to press his clause.
The Earl of HARRINGTON was sorry to be obliged
to oppose a measure in which the noble and learned
lard (Lord Lyndhurst) took so deep an interest. Nor
had he a word to say against the personal character of
Baron Rothschild, but it was a farce to say that the in-
troduction of a rich Jo 01 to Parliament was the consum-
mation of the victory of civil and religious liberty over
bigotry. He opposed the bill because it was contrary to
the institutions, laws, and religious feelings of the people
of this country. Many of the Jews were loan contrac-
tors, who, in a moment of national peril, lent money for
the carrying cn of wars, which might advance the inte-
rests of despots. The Jews bad been ennobled because'
they had lent money to despots. He would rather see a
good Mohammedan or Hindoo sit in Parliament than a
Jew of this description.
The Earl of DERBY said it would be unfair to put the
Jew upon a different footing to the Christian, if elected to
Parliament. (Hear.) The resolution of the noble earl
would interfere with the privileges of the HOuse of Com-
mons. The resolution was quite inconsistent with the title
of the bill. No distinction ought to be drawn between the
subjects on which Jews and Christians should vote.
The Earl of 11 ARRINGTON said that during the last
war large sums of money were sent from this country to
Holland for Russian purposes, the result of which was
that a measure was passed prohibiting such loans. But
he would not press his amendment. (Hear, hear.)
The Earl of GALLOWAY, in resisting the final stage
of the bill, said he would not discuss the question en the
ground of religion or of flencxe-cy.
come bPrb n, cr. kvii,..tatxr might r.ceive a large
toe tor recommending the Sovereign to create Jew

peers.
The bill then pawed.
CHURCHES, &c.( IRELAND) BILL.
This bill was lead a third t mo and passed.
NISI PRIUS COURI (IRELAND) BILL.
This bill passed tkrough committee.
ENCUMBERED ESTATES (WEST INDIES) BILL.
This bill passed through committee.
Their lordships then adjourned at 20 minutes past 8.

HOUSE OF COMMONS—(YESTERDAY.
The SPEAKER took the chair at twelve o'clock.
NEW MEMBER.

Mr. J. St. Aubyri took the oaths and his seat for
West Cornwall, in the room of Mr. Williams, deceased.

NEW WRIT.
Sir W. JOLLIFFE moved for a new writ for the
borough of S,.ainlord, in the room of Mr. John Inglis,
Lord Advocate, wilo has accepted the office of Lord
JuAiee-Clerk in Scotland. The motion was agreed to.
SUPPLY—THE EMBASSY AT PARIS.
Oo the order for going into committee of supply,
Mr. WYSE said he saw with astonishment in the es-
timates delivered on Saturday, a vote of 19.2951. for
the ounbassy-home at Pads, ou which 135,0001. had
been expended. He hoped some explanation would
be offered on this point by the Goveroment. He
thought it would .be better that the ambassador in
tads should be allowed 5,0001. a-year to find his own
house, as was the case with the French ambassador

iu England.
Mr. HAMILTON said he should be happy to lay
on the table the reports and correspondence which was
the foundation of the present vote. • -
The house went into committee of supply, and
several votes were agreed to without discussion.
On the vote of 10 000/. fJr Hong Kong,
Mr. WILSON objected to the vote on the ground
that it was for local, and not imperial parposes.
Lord STANLEY said the Government bad cut of
every item from the expenses which was not neces-
sary.
The vote was then arreed to.
I On the vote of 40,0001. for extra diplomatic expel'.

dance,
Mr. WYSE objected to such a large amount,
and thought that 30,0001. would be ample, and he
moved an amendment to that effect.
Mr. W. S. FITZGERA.LD said there were many
diplomatic arrangements pending, about which it was
impossible to obtain o, correct estimate.
The committee then divided, and the numbers were—
For the amendment
Against it

Majority
Mr. WYSE then moved as an anamendment that
lie vote should be reduced by 5,0001. The committee
then divided—
For the amendment .... 69
Against it Bl
Majority
The vote was then agreed to.
On the vote of 39,4001. for the Nonconforming and
other ministers in Ireland,
Mr. BAXTER moved the reductioa of the vote to
3661., on the ground that grants of public money to
different sects for religious purposes were objectionable.
Mr. P. O'BRIEN opposed the amendment, though
he would have no objection to support a motion for
withdrawing all public grants for religious purposes.
Mr. J. LOCKE thought that endowments ought
not to be attacked piecemeal. He should be happy to
vote for a general measure.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL defended the vote,
which had been in existence from the time of William
the Third.
After some discussion the committee divided.
For the amendment
Against it
Majority —4 111
The amendment was negatived.
Mr. GILPIN moved as an amendment to the clause
to reduce it by 3461. 3s. 4d. for new congregations lance
last year.
Too SOLICITOR,-GENERAL said that chapels had
been built and congregations formed on the proutio of
this vote.
The committee divided—
For the amendment
Against it
Majority.._
The amendment was negatived, and the clause wag
agreed
~,oTiolacek,sitattingwhwicahs sutismpeend:ldr.atptianffeL ro
mutnelsonbeedfortehe
house to hear the royal assent given to certain bills.
siun4
At six o'clock the house eeamed.
SALE OF POISONS BILL.
This bill was brought down from the House of Lords
by Mr. Secretary WALPOLE, and
, read a first time.
MILITARY STORES.
Capt. VIVIAN askedthe Secretary of State for War.
0e conclusion of th
a factw e r that
81s7i 0000 n pairs of boots had
late wa
r,waand that a poition of thosethe n sub-
boots had been bweheenth e whether t wa e
sequently re-purchased by the Government and issued
to the troops I Aloo, whether it wool correct that Capt