The Sun.
London, England, 1804-03-22 00:00:00

GMYI', RHEUMATISM, INDIGESTION.

- • -
rIHE CONCENTRATED ESSENCE of JA.
MAICA •GINGER, patronized and used by the
ROYAL FAMILY, and by the first Personages in the
Kingdom, being sanlioned and recommended by their most
eminent Physicians, who have witnessed its admirable.ef-
reds in the Cure of the Gout, Rheumatism; Indigestion,
Flatulency, Netvous.Head.ach, and Giddiness, Lowness of
Spirits, Tremors, &c. and Spasmodic Affettions of the Sto-
mach and Bowels.
gold only genuine by the Inventors and Proprietors. Oxley
and Thomas, Her Majesty's Chemists, No. 27, Haymarket,
and, by :their appointment, at Air. Bull's, Dublin; Baxter,
Edinburgh ; and by every respectable Vender of Medicines
in ToVn and Country, in BOtilcs-ofss. 63. and los. 6d. Duty
inclUded. • • • _ _ _ _

N. B. INToue ikgenuine but what bears the Scal and Signa-
ture of the Proprietors as above. -

• ..11EALTII AND LONGEVITY.
Dr. JAMES'i•ANKLEpTIC PILLS.
rraohy ia te the- lippositionsAvhich bav,e long been
praelised in regard to thiS Mediciae, a small attention
only is requisite ; for as by, favour of the -Commissioners of
the Stamp-0111a., separate Plates have been ,prepared for
Mr; Net.vbery's use, with his Name engraved in the Stamps,
the
.imitation oflvhich would be a Capital Offence, the ge-
nuine •Preparation' may now be readily ascertained; it is
therefore recommended to Purchasers not to open any Box in
flamer,- unless_ they observe the words, " F. Newbery,
S t.. printed in the Stamp.'
Tire-superior 'Excellence Of these Pills in Rhetunatisms and
Wits, aS well as in other Complaints to which the"htiman
frame is liable, trona the vicissitudes of our Climate, is uni-
versally acknowledged': They are admirably calculated tot
Bilious, and other Disorders. of ,the Stomach and 'Bowels ;
for Head.achs occasioned by Indigestion ; and for preventinz
Palsies and Apoplexies, so-often the consequence of Free
Living. Recourse should be had to them atrer every Ex-
cess, and upon every slight Indisposition; and thus their
well-known charadetistic of promoting Longevity will be
maintained.; for by assisting nature in the due dischiqe of
the animal Imielions, and by keeping the Constitution, as it
were., in continual repair,'hey p:eserve the Body in health
and vigour, and prevent premature decay. Tney require no
particular confinement nor attention to diet.
They are sold only by F. Newbery and Sons, at the Ware-
house for Dr. James's Powder, No. 45, S. Paul's, a few
doors from Cheapside, London; anil at Dr. lanies's late house,
in Bruton-street ; in boxes price .4s. 6d. each, Stamp
on the quantity of SIIC In one large hox,for ii. 45.

IMPER iAL PAR,LI,IAIENT.

N•'JUSE OF PEERS,

WFDNESDAY, MARCH 21.

Cour: cr t. were heard in continuation respeaing the Scotch
A le.ing v. Abercrornby ; namely, Mr. ALEX-
oEit nut Mr. BOYLE, on the. part of the Respondent.
t.ter which their Lordships adjourned the farther hearing of
:ne case till Friday.
The Bills kefore the House were forwarded in their several
sties ; they were chiefly third readings. Amongst. which,
thoie of the Irish Revenue Bill, the Irish Countervailing
Duties Bill, the Irish Malt Duty, and the Hides and TO-
law-Importation Bills, took place.
Several Private Bills were read a third time, and passed.
An Officer from the Court of Exchequer in Ireland pre-
sented at the Bar certain documents relative to the pending
Appeal Cause, Redington v..Redingtran, which were ordered
to he on the Table.
Adjourned till THREE o'clock To-morrow.

HOUSE OF COMIWONS.

WEDNtSDAY, MARCH 21.

DR. GREY, from the British Museum, presented
he Accounts ordered a few days ago by the House
of Commons : they were ordered to lie on the
Table. •
The Reports of the Sugar Warehousing Bill and
the Expiring Laws Bill were brought up and agreed
to, and the Bills were ordered to be read a third
time to-morrow.
The CHANCELLOR Of the EXCHEQUER stated at
the Bar, that His Majesty had been waited upon
i:11 several Addresses of that House, that His
:viajesty had received them graciously, and had
tv2t,n pleased ro say he would give direCtions accord-
trziy.

LISKEARD ELECTION.
Mr. WM. DUND AS said, he rose -to' call the
attention of the House to a Petition, which appeared
to him to be of great importance to the rights of
that House. The Petition was from WIA. HUSK'S,
Esq. and the circumstances it contained were of
yo peculiar a nature, that he hardly knew what :node
of proceeding he ought to adopt. The Petition
stated that an Eleaion had lately taken place for

the Borough of Lisiceard, at which Mr.l-iusxts-
soN. was a Candidate, and was returned by the
111.40 r duly eleaed. When he came to Town, he
found that another Paper, purporting to be a Return
Of tie R.:turning Officer, but without his signature
or his seal, had been sent to the Clerk of the Crown,
stating that .Mr. THomAs SHERIDAN was duly
elet'Aed. This Return had been first sent to the
Ueder-Sheriff, and by him transmitted to the Clerk
of the Crown, and the Under Sheriff thought pro-
per to certify that there was . double Return. Mr.
flusKissoN was placed in a singular situation, be-
cause he could not complain of a double Return, for
in po;nt of fart there was not a double Return,
because the one which declared that NIT.SHERIDAN
was duly eleaed. was neither signed nor sealed, so
that in point of f ct they might as well have sent
an old Bal:ad. it. contended that the Under.Fleriff
could nor, by sc gross a trick, prevent Mr. Hos-
-1,-.1,0N from caking his Seat, and keep the Borough
of Liskeard without a Representa:ive. He wished
to ask the opinion 'of the SPgAKER as to the mode of
rocetA og he ought to pursue.
The SPEAKEI said, if the Petition complained
of an undue Eleaion, it might be presented at the
Table ; if not, he must move for leave to bring it

up.
Mr. Vim. Du N DAS then •moved for leave to bring
up the Petition.
The CHANC ELLOR cf the ExcHnouEtt. wished
the Right Hon. Gentleman to state the purport of
the Petition.
Mr. DUNDAS said, the Petition stated
the circumstances which he had mentioned, and
prayed ler such relief as the House might think
proper. The Motion was then agreed to, and the
Petition was brought up and read. It stated, that
at the last Election for the Borough of Liskeard,
HIJ,K I toON and Mr.-THomAs SHERIDAN were
Candidates ; that by the last decision of the Com-
raittee of the House of Comtnons, the Right of
E:edion was in the . Mayor and Burgesses Of the
said Borough, and that the Mayor was the Re-
tureittg Oilker ; that the Mayor and twenty Bur-
gesses voted fop Mr. Hu,KrssoN, and only three
Burgesses f ,r Mr. 'l'. SHERIDAN, and that Mr. HUS-
K ISSON wi":s therefore declared duly eleded at-al re-
turned ; but that the Under-Sheriff, Mr. DAMON,
had annexed to his Return a second Schedule, by
which Mr. T. SHE F. ID AN was returned, but which
Schedule .had neither the seal nor the signature of
the Mayor,ant therefore the Petitioner prayed for
Air. PITT said, it appeared from the fits stated
in +i e Petition, that the Sheriff had transmitted only
one Ret
the Clerk of the Crown, but it did
not appear to I that the 1-louse could proceed to
,
take any steps until thCy had ascertained the fads of
the case, and the best way would he to order the
Cerk of the Crown to attend with the Returns. If
the fads were correaly stated, there was one corn.
islet. :regular R,:turrt, from which it appeared that
the Returning Officer had executed no otheivlnden-
ture. It also avveared that the Sheriff had received
from somebody something that purported to be an-
other ; not from another person claim hg to be a
Returning Officer, but purporting to be another Re-
turn from the same Returning Officer, but neither
sealed nor signed by him. If this really was the
state of things, it appeared to him that the Sheriff
has, in fad, made but one Return, and that the
person so returned mist take his seat. But still the
other Candidate might ado'pt the regular means of
ascertaining his claim by presenting a Petition, the
merits of which must be decided upon by a Com-
mittee. Suppose fur ais that there had been
no other Candidate but. Mr. SHERIDAN, and that
there was no other Return but that one which was
now the subjed of discussion, there could be no
doubt but that upon such a Return he could not take
his seat.. If then this Return would have been of
nc cite in the case only tif one Candidate, it cer.
tastily cenid be nf no avail against a regular Return.
'Upon the whe'.e, he thought the regular m 'de of
proceeding I,votid be to order theCerk of the Crown
to attend e.lth the Returns, anti then the
.11ouse
~,..redd be aisH o, jndge" wheith.r the facts were cur-

starekt
:Mr. SILE,R4D..q,y !,ai,!, he t the Right
(;;;;Itletito I.Motton'

would have aled more candidly if he had given
him notice of his intention•of bringing,forward this
Motion; The Question as to the Right of Eleaion
in this Borough was to be decided in a very short
time, and therefore he thought' that it would be
proper that all proceedings upon the present Bubjeet
should be deferred tsil after the Question of Right
was decided. He was really unacquainted with the
circumstances of this case, and did not know any
thing of that Pastoral Cornish Gentleman (Mr. Da.
mou), who had been mentioned. He certainly
wished this double Return bad not been made, but
it was not in the power of Mr. T. SHERIDAN to
withdraw the second Return after it had been made..
The Right Hon. Gentleman had contended that
such a Return could in no case he received by the
House, but he could by no means agree in that pro-
position : because it was in fart the Sheriff who was
bound to make the Returns, and he was.the respon-
sible person, and the Sheriff would have been justi-
lied in acting upon the Return of the Burgesses
themselves. The Writ authorising the Eleetion
was direeled to the Sheriff; it made no mention
whatever of the Returning Officer. The House,
therefore could know nothing hut of the Sheriff; if
he at-led wrong he might be punished, and the party
injured might undoubtedly bring an attion against
him. The faCt was in this case, that a Return was
first made to the Sheriff by the Inhabitants, of Mr.
T. SHEItIDAN, which he accepted; afterwards ano.
ther Return by the Mayor was also presented ; he
received them both, and transmitted them to the
Clerk of the Crown. This he understood to be the
state of the faBs, and he contended that it was
net a question upon which the House could decide,
:but it must be referred to a Committee.
Mr. WM. DUNDAS said, that with regard to
the candour of his proceeding, he could only say,
that he did not know of the Petition when he last
conversed with the Hon. Gentleman upon the sub.
jeCt. With regard to the second Returni he con.
tended it was a mere nullity, because in WI it was
not signed by any person, though it purported to
be signed by the Returning Officer.
,Mr. SHERIDAN adverted to the case of the
Elettion f..r Helstone, in which place a person who
conceived he had a right to ad as a Returning Offi-
cer under an old Charter (though it had expired and
a new one had been granted), actually made a Re-
turn of two Members, and the regular Returning
Officer under the new Charter, returned two other
Members ; in that case it was considered as a dou-
ble Return, and referred to a Committee.

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
said, that if this Return should turn out to be as it
had been stated, a mere nullity, then the'House
could of course immediately decide upon it ; but if
there were any evidence to be examined,, then it
must be referred to a Committee. He wished at
present not to give any opinion upon the subje6l,
or prejudge it in any manner.
The Minion was then agreed to.
Mr. PITT moved, that the Clerk of the Crown
should attend to-morrow with the Returns. With
regard to what haof been said by the Hon. Gentle-
man about double Returns, they were cases where
two persons claimed to be Returning Officers, but
in the present case the Return was not signed by a
person claiming to be a Returning 'Officer, nor was
it in fact signed ar all.
Mr. BOROUGHS was of opinion that in this
case there was • only one Return, and consequently
the House could decide upon the point without re.
fetting it to a Committee.
MT. PITT'3 Motion WAS agreed to.
A Message from the'Lurds Informed the House
their. Lordships had agreed to the Irish Malt Duty
Bill, and to the several other Irish Revenue Bills,
without any Amendment.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved
the Order of the Day for the House to resolve itself
into a Committee of the whole House to consider
further of Ways and Means for raising a supply
granted to His Majesty.
The Order being read, the CHANCELLOR of the
EXCHEQUER. moved, That the Account of the Dis-
position of Grants of Great Britain, presented on
the 4th of March instant, be referred to the said
Committee. O,dered.
He then moved, That the SPEAKER do now leave
the/Chair.
The question being put,
Mr. DENT was proceeding to make some obser-
vations on the promise of the CHANCELLOR of the
EXCHEQUER to bring in a Bill to indemnify Ban-
kers and other grear Commercial Persons who had
received Dividends for others, by virtue of Powers
of Attorney, from certain penalties in the Property
Bill for not returning, as that Bill required, the
amount of Dividends so received, &c. when he was
informed by
The SPEAKER, that nothing was regular upon
the present Motion, except that which 'might be,
urged by way of objection to the. SPEAKER leaving
the Chair.
'Mr. DENT then caid, that if driven to that
course, he must take it, and objet to the SPEAKER
leaving the Chair, until at least some explanation
was given 'to some questions he had to put to tlw
CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, and it was in-
formation he had a right to ask in the common
course of business in that House. He said it referred •
to the situation of all those who acted as Agents in
the management of Dividends, and who were so
circumstanced as to demand the attention of the
House, and particularly the information of the Right
Hon. Gentleman ; for if the House shouldadjourn
over the sth of April, which was. probable, and
make no provision cn this subjeCt, those Bankers
and others, who had received dividends for
others, would all of them be subjeft to the
penalties in the Property • Bill, for not returning
an account of the amount of them as that Bill
required, for then four quarters of the Tax under,
that Rill will be due.—Not one of those who
had thus received dividends for others by virtue of
Powers of Attorney, would he exempted from the
penalties in the Property At for not returning the
'amount of such dividends. The hardship of this
wt.,ulal be enormous, for When they had an iriN,r-
course with the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQU f R.
early in the Winter, when the diflicnities of -con.
fort-ning to the Property Att began to b! felt, they
were i!ss;...'red that rite Bill would .be %mended by a
(-21a135('--*11.) Hon. Gentleman intended

to. propose, to exempt Bankers and other persons
of that description from the penalties of the Al,
and that such Clause was to be brought in soon after
the Christmas Recess. It was expected of the can.
dour of the Right Hon. Gentleman, that such a
clause would have been proi)osed soon after the
Christmas Recess, and yer the House was now about
to adjourn for the Easter Recess without any such
provision.: nor did it appear that any alteration
was intended to be made in the Proncrty Bill this

Session, as had been colletled by what the CH AN-
_

CELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said in answer to a

question which had some time ago been put to him,
and by which it seemed that the Property Tax was
to be tried by way of experiment for the present
year, in order that Ministers might judge whether
it was, a measure fit to be continued or not. There

was, however, in that answer, also an assurance that
the Bankers and other commercial persons who had
received dividends for others, and who, on account

of some insuperable 'difficulties in the Property Aft,
had been unable to make returns conformable to that

Ad, should he indemnified against the penalties of
that Ad. The answer was, that '' they shotkid
not be liable." Now he hoped he should have an

explicit answer to the./ que.stion he was about to put
to tie CHANCELLOR. of the EXCHEQUER, for he

came down on purpose to put that question on be-
half of the great body of Bankers and commercial
men who were apprehensive that They should he all
liable to these penalties; although it had not,been
their fault that they were incurred. The question
was this, Whether any such Clause as that which
the Cs ANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER promised to
.propose soon after the Christmas Recess, or some
other measure to that effete, was to be brought for-
ward before •tile approaching Easter Recess ? Upon
the answer which he received to that question would

depend the course he should pursue on the question
now before the House. The next question was

equally rinmentous with the former, and that was--
At what period the Holders of the Loyalty Loan
were entitled to be plid.cfF, under the Provisions of
the Law upon the subject of that Loan ?—The Aft
-of Parliament said two years after signing the.Defi-
nitiVe Treaty of Peace, and that six months notice
should be given. - He understood that the opinion
of the Attorney and Solicitor General had been
taken upon this subject ;
.but the parties concerned
in that Loan could not learn what that opinion was,
or what was understood to be the Law upon that

subjea ; and they wished to have their. doubts re-
moved upon it by some public declaration upon
which they might rely, for otherwise by the io'h
of October next they would be under some difficul-
ties ; upon which subjea also he wished for some
explanation. It was thus he was obliged to apply
to the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, fur with-
out some public explanr lion from that' Right Hon.
Gentleman, these parties could not judge property
of the situation in which they 5t00d,.,.

.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
said, that consistently with the forms of the House,
he could hardly answer the Hon. Gentleman, be-
cause no answer he could give could have any re-
ference to the question that the'SPEAKER &) now
leave the Chair; but, however, by the indulgence
Of the House, he should answer the Hon. Gentle-
man. Oh the first pciint he was perfedly satisfied
that the House would think it incumbent on them
to relieve the parties to whom the Hon. Gentleman
had adverted, from the penalties to which they
might be liable under the provisions of the Property
Bill, and the question now only was, whether it
was absolutely, necessary that the provision for their
exemption should take place previous to the ensuing
Easter Recess, or might he deferred until after.
'wards : upon which sujca it was his intention to
.propose to bring in a Bill to remove, doubts upon
this subjea, fur the purpose of exempting them
from penalties, to which by the. way he believed
they were not liable ; hut, however, as doubts were
entertained, it would be well to remove them. In
case any proceeding should be had for the ipurpose
of recovering any of these penalties, the House in
its justice would interpose and stop such proceed-
ings. As to the second point, he was a little stir-
prized at the question of the Hon. Gentleman ; he
must know from his connelions, that at the request
of some persons immediately interested in the
Loyalty Loan, that an application was made to him
for the purpose of ascertaining what was the con-
strudion put upon the terms and conditions specified
in that Ad of Parliament : he referred the point to
the Attorney and Solicitor General. The opinion
of these learned Gentlemen was communicated to
Government, and a distind communication was
made to the Bank, and to that he begged leave to
refer the Hon. Gentleman.
Mr. DENT observed, there was a positive pro.
mise do the subject of Bankers liability for receiving
dividends, &c. under the Property Tax, that a
provision should- be made immediately after the
Christmas Recess. He must again repeat his appre-
hension of the danger of deferring it till after the
sth of April, when the four quarters, will be due on
the Property Tax. He observed, that when the
Bankers.,had waited on the Right Hon. Gentleman
upon. this subject, they declared he had treated them
-with•great. candour, by which he had been led to
dismiss all doubt that the Right Hon. Gentleman
would fulfil his promise immediately after 'the
Christmas Recess.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
said, that a fortnight ago he told the Hon. Gentle-
man
.distintaly his intention to bring forward a pro-
position, and of his confidence in the disposition:of
the House to grant it, for the purpose of
:pioteding
the persons, to whom he had alluded, from the
penalties under the Property Bill ; and if it was any
great satisfaCtion to them, as by the manner in
which the Hon. Gentleman pressed it in their behalf
he apprehended it would, the measure might yet be
proposed before the Easter ReEess. He did not al-
left to distrust the Hon. Gentleman, but if he had
a few hours for the purpose of ascertaining whether
it was really and bona fife the wish of the. Bankers
that a measure should be brought forward before the
Recess, he should be glad to hold a conversation
upon that subject.
Mr. DENT said a few words.
The
.SPEAKER suggested the propriety of limit-
ing the indulgence of the House to this irregularri c.versation.
Mr. PITT said, he had no desire to-
prolong the

conversation, but he must observe, that as ir was,
stated that these penalties had been incurred, and
as it was a general opinion that the parties who 1131
incurred them ought to be indemnified in this
‘a casei
they ought to be relieved from the penalties
out delay, lest a further difficulty might afi,e bY,,
other persons instituting suits for the recovery ot
the penalties under the Ad of Parliament. 'al
subjel of the Loyalty Loan, he observed, that
had -been apprehended the Ad of Parliament had
somehow by mistake been drawn up in a war'
ner which was not Stridly conformable In the
Resolutions upon the terms of which the Lay'
alty Loan was contraCted for; this was a 113is'
take for which he himself was in some degree tin:
swerable, and therefore he Was the more hounq,
to take notice of it, and to do all he could to reaifr
the error, for it happened when he was Chancellor
of the Exchequer-. The Resolutions of the Cot
mittee were the foundation of 'the bargain and Coil'
trad for that Loan, and if the Ad of Parliament
happened by mistake afterwards to be drawn
a manner that was not conformable to that Res°lti-;
tion, it ought to he altered, or some relief shoo"
be given to the ContraCtors for that Loan, othere.°.'
wise Parliament would be guilty of a breach of
towards these persons.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUEIIn •
said, he could assure the Right Hon. Gentletii,fi
that great pains had been taken to ascertain sy",s"
were really the terms of the Loyalty Loan, and the
opinion of th Attorney and Solicitor Garieralahe)
'
been taken on it ; but, however, it was notoosailitc
for these learned Gentlemen to give an opinion 0/-'''°-;
any thing but the Aft of Parliament •itself,- nor -
it possible for Government, without further dire"; .
tion4rotn Parliament,
to
accede to any constru
upon the Loan, but such as the law warranted.,
Mr. PITT said, he 'never stated that the ltt
Hon. Gentleman, or the Lords of the Treasurre •
could do otherwise than comply striftly with .
Ad of Parliament, but what he said was, that 41'—
Aft ot Parliament had by mistake been drawn ‘ll,
in a manner not conformable to the Resolutions e;
which, and on which only the Loyalty Loan v't
founded, that Ad ought to be altered, and 1111‘'.7t
.
conformable to the Resolutions from whicil l
emanated, and if it were not made so confortn4hie'
Parliament would be guilty of a breach of fa+th td'
wards the Subscribers, and in this respeet )1e
took ,
some blame to himself for the inadverteneY•
Mr. VANSITTART said a few words, whieeh
ws
could not distindly hear.
The House then 'resolved itself into a' Committee
of the whole House, to consider of Ways and IVlean,
for raising a Supply granted to Hi; Majesty.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
said, that if Gentlemen would have the goodness
to turn to the third page of the Disposition Parr'
they would perceive that the total of Grants for the;
Naval Service of last year was 9,551,3781; and
the
debt for the Naval Service Was 8,174,71'1'
fore the Grants exceeded the Debt by 1,776,6671 a
This being the ca,e, lie should have to propose suet
the amount of this surplus should be issued and O' _
were it not for circumstances he was al:an°
to state. In the itch page of the Disposition Patir;
several payments were stated and made by anth°rirra-
of an Aft of Parliament, out of the ay and Mitict.
of the year,
,and that -amounted to 579.7061' '„a
therethaz reduced the surplus he had above stared'
that
therefore the Committee would not consider 6671
there was really a saving to the amount of 1 ,776.5 a
that was to sty, that the Public had expended it
by that amount in the Navy than the grants 'unc)ilfi
ed to, for that in fad the Navy Debt had increoseii
931,6591. last year. Gentlemen might ask how
could be ? but they would he aware, that in ma
ant
instances it was wholly unavoidable, on aee°`tei
of what might be paid to Seamen on Foreign Sersucag
and which it was impossible to calculate the emoted
of before hand, and that sometimes accumnl4.as
some time before it could be ascertained. 1'13°,..
stated several sums on this head, the sum he }:„/-05
posed to be voted now upon this occasion, 0
1,370,6741.—and therefore he- moved, that litoci
the opinion of this Committee, that there be isiufi
and applied to the service' of the year, &c. the 500 ,
of 1,370,664. zs. Bd. from the Surplus of the c't! ,-•
ot the year 1803. was
Lord FOLKESTONE contended that thiere sure
a fallacy_ in the account, as in fad there 00 Sri-0,
plus, but on the contrary, a deficiency. N,‘;„teti
tice was taken of the surplus of the Consnil •
'Pt
Fund. The War Taxes had been estimated 110 and
' duce by the sth of , January last, 4,soo,oo°"docea
had fallen short 2,603,0001. this therefore fear to a'
the surplus appearing on the face of the ;,ccou"...,
the
deficiency of 1,300,0001. He also objeated t't
be
mode of making up the account, as it could n° pad,
understood from it upon what it was the 53'4111
arisen. It had been stated by a Noble Lord O, co, -
former occasion, that the Land Forces amonntenod;
96,000 ; the number its the account was only 66'?tfic
he wished to know therefore out of what fun') 00
remaining number were paid. He saw likewis,eakc
item ,of 1,500,0001. to enable His Majesty
tO _firer
such steps as the exigency of affairs might l'equekt'
but there was no account how that money ""s' •
pended. had been,
Mr.
said, the accounttha-:
made out in a similar manner from year to yea tways
pradice being to appropriate the excess of the I, of
and Means over the Supply in aid• of the Sul the,
the ensuing year, notwithstanding there Inig
rows
outstanding demands. With respect} to the stittaio,
of the Consolidated Fund, about 900,0001• re'
ivy
ed to be made good. As to the a'far Taxes'to ire
were estimated not to the eth of January. but ut Of
sth of April, at a produce of 4,so,ol::::::lse.ol:Licpbai‘li,
that however, there had been up to last wee „foe
into the Exchequer 3,130,0001.
only remained a deficiency ot 1,300,0001••• .sth of
probable might he paid in before Abe lase
Aprti, ot at least reduced to a small .sray;
e„
items ip the account were arranged in the oil d 00 °
as to the Army the number of Forces
,atat.i'm '
or
former occasion, included various deseril „at.
force wloch could not come within this -aceicconti
Of he Surplus stated oa the face of the
1, quer 'lO
900,000 i. aetualiy remained in the Ex- t
applied. seve t
VANsiTT
Lent FOLKESTONE and Mt. A t
rally explataed. if Ilse great
Mr. JOHN.STONE wished CO kilOW

l