The Sun.
London, England, 1858-06-12 00:00:00

MR. CECIL MOORE.

Mr. J. FITZGERALD asked the Attorney Gcnf ral
for Ireland, whether Mr. Cecil Moore, who had betn
recently appointed Sessional Crown Prosecutor for the
county of T • e, was t,'e same Mr. Cecil Moore
-3 rim
de-
scribed in the appendix to the report on the Belfast
Riots, p. 289, as Cecil Moore, of Cottage Hill, Augh-
nactony, Grand Secretary of the Tyrone Orange Lodge ?
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL for IRELAND said
the person lately appointed was the same person referred
to in the question. The appointment was made on the
recommendation of the two members for the county,
and the assistant barrister for the district. ([fear )
LADIES' GALLERY.
Mr. EDWARDS asked the Chief Commissioner of
Works, if thtra was any objection to an increase of
accommodation in the Ladies' Gallery ?
Lord J. MANNERS said he had made inquiries
into the subject. He had no objection to make an
experiment as recommended, and, if it answered, to
further Extend
OFFICERS' SOLDIER-SERVANTS.

General CODRINGTON—;;;;;;T7Ie---gecif;tary of
State for War, whether the warrant of 1857, relating to
Officers' Soldier• Servants was or was not cancelled ; and,
if not, whether it was still considered that the sudi of
Is. a-day in England, and le. 6d. a.day abroad was a
sufficient sum to pay for a civilian rervant
General PEEL said the war circular referred to bad
been cancelled. (Hear, hear.)
CHATHAM. BARRACKS,
In reply to a question,
. _

Gen. PEEL said he bad received no official report re-
lative to the scarcity of water at Chatham Barracks. His
attention had been called to the subject by a paragraph
he had seen in the public papers, and he had sent down
an officer to make inquiry sand report thereon. (Hear.)
INDIA.—LORD CANNING'S PROCLAMATION.
On the motion for adjournment till Monday,
Mr. WILSON asked the President of the Board of
Control whether any distinct information had been re-
ceived that Lord Canning's Proclamation Lad been
issued at Lucknow, and of the result which bad been
produced upon the talookdars in their relation to the
British Government.
Lord STANLEY took the opportunity of correcting
a slight mistake he made yesterday. He was
yesterday asked if any official document had been re-
ceived by the last mail relative to the pacification of
Oude, and whether he saw the notice on the paper—be
canoed enquiry to be made in his department, ard
be
received a positive assurance that nothing official had
been received on the subject. After he had given his
answer yesterday to the question, be was informed that
at the bottom of a miscellaneous despa'eh there was a
paragraph bearing date the 3d of April, stating that the
talookdars were holding aloof from the rebel cause,
and that the Chief Commissioner fervently hoped there
would not be much longer any serious opposition to our
rule in ()tide. (Hear.) Two lists had been sent in contain-
ing the names of those who had come forward, and whose
claims to the lands would be reinvestigated,.
.(Hear.)
The proclamation of the Governor-General had beensetit•d
but considerably modified from that sent hove. (Hear.)i
From various private letters he had read, he hoped there
was reason to believe that the policy now actually pur-
sued in Oude was one of conciliation and justioe, and
the results, so far as they had been ascertained, were
believed to be sati-factory in their effect on
noble lordon the landed
proprietors and others. (Hear, l hear.)
took occasion to reply to the following question on the
paper by the hon. member for Devonport (Sir E Perry),
whether letters from the Governor-Ger eral of India had '
not been received, covering reports of a public character,
from Mr. Montgomery and other officers in (hide, re-
lating to the pacification of that country, and whether
these was any objection to laying such reports on
the table ? The letters he (Lord Stanley) bad
seen were private letters, though containing en-
closures on public matters. Unfortunately he had
no control over those letters, and could not pro-
duce them ; and with regard to the enclosures, he could
not undertake then to produce them, believing it would
be for the benefit of the public service at present to
withhold them. It would be more convenient to delay
the publication till the receipt of the corning despatch
containing explanations. He would also take that op-
portunity of answering another question on the paper,