The Sun.
London, England, 1858-06-29 00:00:00

the people did not really and in deed feel—the
fore he agreed in this motion. It should be dist'ne'l
understood that there was in this no alteration of
the Book of Common Prayer. It bad been said that
this motion was only for an instalment of other
amendments, but he thought it was one of those motions
v hick would prevent others being brought forward.
He looked upon the Book of Common Prayer as ore
of the greatest blessings. oir Liturgy bad been formed
from the earliest times of the Christian church,
and we inherited it free from the superstition of more
modern times. The proposition bef. re their lordships did
not touch the Book cf aunt/ion Prayer. The services
marred to ware a mere a.n:.exation to the Book of Oem-
man Prayer, by virtue of the proclamation of the cove-
reigr. and might be removed and liar,. fit. P,:.:-,77.-`No.k
just the came its it. But
Fe: pisil of the motion which ho elated to
e altered. It included the cervices fur the accts: inn
of her Mcjqsty, and played her Majesty to issue a new
proela aut;on. He s:fould be content to leave that ser-
vice as it now stood. He thought their lordships ought
to pause before taking any new step to give new autho-
city, and should be sorry to see, in answer to the address,
a proclamation altering that rervice, unless it was to be
used. lie thougl.t it desirable there should be a ervica
of prayer and tbanlugivirg far the accession of the cove.
reign. He doubted not that the prayer of the Init!011
annually offered up for the sovereign drew down blet.
Sings upon the throne of ;Lat sovereign ; but care ought
to be taken to render the service fit f,r the orcasinth
an one which e•mill be used uniformly. He thought a
short addition to the service used on the Sunday nearest
th,, day of accession would be the most desirable course
to adapt ; but at present in his opinion it would be bet-
ter not to mention that service in the address, and hi
would sug,;est that the motion should be confined to
the other three pervuee.

The B:sbep cf CASHEL believed that nearly all the
weal-thinking and zealous members of the Church of
En4lari and Ireland desired to see these services re-
rn, vtd from che Prayer-hook, always remembering 'hat
they were not a part c,f the Prayez-b..ok at all.
Lord CAMPBELL impressed his mtiefecticn at the
manrer in which the motion bad been received by their
'orilebies, and said he believed the change now proposed
ti ould render the Prayer-book sill dearer to the mem-
, ere ot the united churches e f England and Ireland.
lordship: were now asked to agree to do
f rtnally that which for so many years had been done
in!ormaily. Tbere was another thing wanting to cons-
pl to the object which his noble friend (Earl Stan-
to,ie) had in view. Their lordships were ewers
that the dui y pray rA in thlt house inclu led words re-
lating to the Gunpowder PI t. Ile h d spoken to seve
/al or the right rev, prelates on tbe subject, hod no one
was able to tell him bow the words gut into the ec rviee,
or how to get them 'out. - Re- trusted th(y writ:ld mu-
eider fOill3 means by which the services might be re-
lievrd Irons those wo:ds.

The Ent of MALMESBURY riitl not ri a to oppose
the motion of the noble earl, but thought he was not
taking the beet course to accomplish his object. ec•
tirely differed from those who wished the acts of Parlia-
ment to remain as rnenvotials of the times which had
been referred to. It ibese ads of Parliament had pro-
duced thee() proc'ama;rons he thought they were very
objtTiortlble, ant could not underetaod why the cause
should be retained and the tffeet be abolished. He
thought the noble earl, instead of inviting her 'Majesty
to rtpcal the proclamatons, ought to endeavour to re-
peal are statutes, and then the proclamations would fall
to the ground. By pureeing such a course an opportu-
nity would be afforded to the other house of expressing
its opinion ; but, as the matter now stood, the motion
wor:li only Le an expression of the opinion of their lor&
ships.

The B shop of ST. ASAPII begged to say that his
right rev. brother, the Bishop t‘f Bangor, did not stand
alone in Lis objections to the 'notion, for he himself felt
bound to pretest against it.
Lard REDESDA LE thought it most desirable that
the preytr which had been referrtd to by the t oble and
learned lords should be txpunged from the daily service
of the huge.

The words objected to by the Bishop of Oxford
having b;cir struck out, the motion, as amended, wat
put and agreed tn.

-UNIVERSiIsIES' AND COLLEGES' ESTATES]
BILL.
This bill was rend a eecond time.
Their lordship Vann adjourned at a quarter before
tai a o'cicck.