The Sun.
London, England, 1858-03-08 00:00:00

MOIqID

what he was likely to say, but it appeared to bim
that as the counsel for tho Crown, ho ought not to
call a convicted felon, as he considered his evidence
would be of very little value as corroborative testi-
mony, either one way or the other.
Mr. Justice Williams said he should take upon
himself to examine the witness, and Ringshell was
accordingly sent for to the gaol, and he arrived in
a short time and was sworn and examined.

The learned judge having cautioned him as to
the importance of his speaking the truth in so
solemn an inquiry, proceeded to put some questions
to him, in answer to which he stated that, on
Woednesadoal, so
y evening, when' he was in the van going
t the gaol, e asked him what he had got,
and he replied ten months' imprisonment ; but he
else passed between
conversation of any kind
them, swore positivelyand
that
no that
otherat nothing
took place in the van as it was going from the court
to the gacl, or when it entered the gaol yard.
The jury wished to know whether there was any
one else in the van who could give any further
informagovernortionthe
uponthesnbject ?
The gaol (Mr. Hatehard) said
that a young woman, the daughter of one of the
turnkeys, was riding in front of the van, and there
was a turnkey, who was her father, behind the
vehicle.

The jury said they should like these persons to be
examined. . _ _

Th© learned judge said by all means this should
be done. _

of Elizabeth Duncombe, she then being under the age of
16. There was also a count for a❑ indecent assault.
Mr. Henry Mills appeared for the prosecution ; the
prisoners were defended by Mr. Power and Mr. Tozer.
Mary Duncombe, examined by Mr. Mille—l am the
mother of Elizabeth Duncombe. She was 15 years old
last Christmas-day. She lived at home with me. On the
7th of August last she left home between 8 and 9 •'clock
in the evening. She was going to her brother's to sleep.
She did not return. I found her at home again the third
day after this. I was constantly looking for her. She
went away against my will.
Cross-examined by Mr. Power—My daughter cornea
home between 10 and 11 o'clock at night, and sometimes
goes to dances and fairs alone. A girl named Gurney
often takes her out.

Elizabeth Dancombe (an extremely good-looking girl,
but is appearance consil rably above the age of 15),
examined by Mr. Mills—l left home on the 7th August.
I went with Anne Gurney to the Axe and Cotnpaesss.
We saw the defendants outside. We spoke to them. We
then went with them to the Bell, at Eddlesborough. We
had some gin. The defendants paid for it. We stopped
till between 11 and 12 o'clock. There were three other
girls there ; they left about 11 o'clock, and we and the
men remained for half-an-hour. We then wont to Mr.
Primett's premises. He is a married man and has two
children. Simmons is a widower, and has four children.
We ;topped till between 3 and 4 o'clock, and then went
away into the road. The men came with a gig which
holds two. I sat on Primett's knee, and Anne Gurney
sat on Simmons'; knee. We drove to Tring. We went by
train to London at .a quarter to 8 o'clock. I believe
Primett took my ticket. After breakfast we went by
water to Gravesend and returned the same day to town.
We went to the theatre ; we then went to lodgings. I
slept with Mr. Primett, and Anne Gurney with Sim-
mons. We returned to Tring on Sunday, and then
parted company, and I went home. I paid no expenses.
Cross-examined by Mr. Po wer—l went straight home.
I have known Primett some months. I have danced with
him. lam a good dancer. When I came home at night I
always found the door unbelted and mother in bed.
Anne Gurney is older than I am. We sent in to the
Axe and Compasses to inquire whether the defendants
were there. They came out to us. Mrs. Brinklow came
in. The other three girls ran into the yard because she
is a friend of theirs. We did not run away when she
Came.

Mary Anne Dunning, the young woman referred
to, was then examined. She stated that she was
riding outside the van on Wednesday evening, and
heard some conversation going on inside; but could
not hear what was said. There were two or three
voices. The talking began soon after the van started,
and continued till it stopped at the prison, and
when it had entered the gates it commenced again,
but her father, who was riding behind the van, then
interfered, and put a stop to it, as it was against
the prison regulations for the prisoners to talk to
each other.
Stephen Dunning, the father, was also examined,
and he slid that he heard talking in the van when
it was at the gaol gate, but only two or three words,
and that ho immediately put a stop to it, and
threatened to report all the prisoners for breaking
the gaol rules.
Mr. Justice Williams put soma questions to the
witness, in answer to which he said that the com-
partments in the van were all separated entirely
from each
and they were ventilated by grat-
ingsvan. He said that it was possible
the prisoners might communicate with each other
as the van was going along, if they spoke very loud.
outside
The jury eventually expressed a desire to exa-
mine the van, and they went out, accompanied by
a bailiff, for that purpose. It turned out that, in
addition to the gratings for ventilation at the side,
that there were others at the top of each compart-
ment, which afforded a ready means to the pri-
soners for communicating with each other.
This closed the case fur the prosecution.
Mr. Sergeant Parry then proceeded to address
the jury for the prisoner, and, although he appeared
to be labouring under indisposition, and asked for
the indulgence of the jury on that ground, he made
a most eloquent and telling speeu h on behalf of his
client. Ho said he should not for a moment at-
tempt to deny that a most foul and cruel murder
had been committed ; but the proposition, and the
only one he should endeavour to make out to the
satisfaction of the jury on behalf of the wretched
man at the bar—wretched, if he were innocent,
and doubly wretched if guilty—would bo that the
evidence against him was not of that direct and
conclusive character as called upon them, in the
performance of the solemn duty in which they were
engage], to return a verdict the effect of which must
inevitably be to consien a living, breathing human
being now standing before them in the full vigour
of manhood to a felon's death on the scaffold. That
it was a case of suspicion against the prisoner—of
strong suspicion, if they pleased, he could not deny;
but no man's life, he said, ought to be taken upon
suspicion only ; and even if they should be of opi-
nion that there was moral doubt of his guilt, still if
the evidence did not establish it in a.clear and con-
clusive manner, it was the duty of a jury, and they
were only acting in strict conformity with the law,and
performing the obligations of the solemn oath they
had taken, to say that he was not guilty of the crime
alleged against him. The theory of the prosecution
if he could be permitted to apply such a term to an
inquiry of this solemn character, appeared to be
that the unfortunate deceased had received special
instructions on the day of the murder to watch the
prisoner, upon the supposition that he had com-
mitted some offence, and that this had led to the
fatal encounter between them, but he said that the
evidence failed, as it appeared to him, altogether,
to make out that fact, and all that was proved ap-
peared to be that the deceased had received instruc-
tions to be about the neighbDurhood of Norton
Green Farm, and to report himself at nine o'clock ;
and he urged that although they might have their
suspicions upon the subject, their was no direct
testimony toshow that the prisoner and the deceased
ever came in contact with each other on this
fetal night. He therefore contended that the case
for the prosecution failed at the very onset, and
that all the other circumstances that were relied
upon might be explained in a manner consistent
with the innocence of the prisoner. The learned
sergeant then proceeded to observe upon the fact
of the blood-stains being found upon the clothes of
the prisoner, and he said that nothing was more
likely than that such marks should be discovered
who, it was proved that his nose was in the habit
of bleeding, and that only a short time before he
had been engagedin performing an operation upon
some pigs, which caused them to bleed a great deal.
With regard to the evidence given by the policeman
Quint, be called upon them to dismiss it altogether
from their consideration, as unworthyof belief. Re
said he was contradicted in several material parti-
culars by the other persons in the van, and he
urged upon the jury the extreme improbability that
the prisoner should have made such a statement to
a man of whom he knew nothing. He then re-
ferred to the other facts in the case, and concluded
a most able speech by calling upon the jury to say
by their verdict that the charge was not proved,
and therefore that tiesy acquitted the prisoner.
The learned Judge then summed up the whole
case with great care and minuteness, and the jury
retired to consider their verdict.
They returned into court in about half an hour,
when they stated that they found the prisoner not
guilty, but at the same time said that thy thought
it was a case of ;Treat suspicion against him, but that
there was not sufficient direct evidence to justify
them in finding him guilty of the crime with which
he was charged.
There was an attempt at applause when the ver-
dict was delivered, which turned out to proceed from
some relatives of the prisoner who were in the gal-
lery of the court, and ityeas speedily suppressed.
The prisoner was then ordered to be discharged,
I and this concluded the business of the assizes.

By the Lord Chief• Justice—l knew what a man was
before I saw Primett.

This being the ease for the prosecution, the Lord
Chief-Justice ruled that there was no case against
Simmons.

Mr. Power then addres ed the jury for Primett.
The Lord Chief-Justice summed up, and told the jury
that if they thought the girl bad been allowed by her
mother to run loose, although the mother said it was
against her will that her daughter was taken away,
yet it was for the jury to say whether she had any will
in the matter ; and, however immoral the conduct of the
defendant might be, unless they believed that he took
her out of the possession and against the will of her
mother, ho W 3.3 not guilty of an offence against the
etatuts.

OXFORD CIRCUIT.--WORCESTER, MA.Rcu G.
(Before Mr. Baron Watson.)
THE KIDDERMINSTER ELECTION RIOTERS.—William
Pitt, butcher ; Benjamin Wellings, weaver ; Robert
west wood, publican ; Henry Westwood, publican ; Geo.
Barker, weaver ; William Wood, weaver ; Samuel
Payne, John Cook, Elizabeth Bentley, John Drury,
mason ; John Beehell, IYIKAOO ; George Parker ; J.
Smain, weaver ; John Stevens, umbrella maker ; and
Charles Partridge, weaver—were indicted for riotously
assembliug at .Kiddermiuster on the 4th day of April,
the pull day for Kiddercuinster, at the last geosral elec-
y, Q
riot,
and attacking several persons.
An.o., and Mr. Kettle were counsel for
the pros
peror‘es-Va,cthia't3ttgleolatea ; and Me-. Huddleston, Q.C., and Mr.
Byrne for the accused,
the parties had been at large on bail.
On
the
understoodparties
being
thatthey did so
called up on, they
theypleaded b
would
it
being
discharged on their own reoognisances.
The prisoners were then bound over on their own
recognisances in 100/, each to appear when called upon.
BURGLARY 'WITH VIOLENCE.—SENTENCE OF DEATH.
—Benj,,mm Gordon and Charles Pearson were indicted
for breaking into the dwelling-house of,Thos. Cartwright,
at Hagley, on the 26th December, and stealing money
and with cruelly beating and ill-treating the
prosecutor and his wife.
and
Thegouds,
prosecutor is an aged labourer, and lived with his
wife, also in years,
at Broadmareb, Hagley. On the
night of the 26th of December his house was broken
into by three
men, and the old people were savagely
treated. The prisoners were two of the men, the third
being Thoo. P
ar"A
"e, who was now admitted Queen's
evidence. He detailed the particulars of the plot, its
plan and execution ; proved the murderous violence used
towards the old couple, and the subsequent distribution
of the spoil amongst them. The prosecutor was still in
a very weak state from the treatment he had received,
and his head was bandaged. lie had been cut in seve-
ral places with a billhook. Gordon attacked the old
woman, Pearson ransacked the boxes in the room, and
the third kept watch. She gave Pearson her purse,
containing 1/ ,to save her life. The police, on arriving
at the cototge, found a pool of blood which had flawed
from the old man's head.
B)th were found guilty.
His lordship commented on the enormity of tho
crime, and on the necessity of protecting person and
property from lawless violence. Gordon had used the
billhook,
and it was no want of will of his that the
wounds he had it flitted on the old man had not been
fatal. He, therefore, sentenced him to death in the
usual form, without any hope of mercy. Sentence of
death was also recorded against Pearson, but without
an intimation that Lis life would be spared.

The jury without any hesitation acquitted the
defendant.

BALL OF LORD CLARBNDON.

(Froid the Daily News.)
If the fall of Lord Clarendon and his Ministerial
abettors be considered only in the light of an exemplary
punishment inflicted by the representatives of the nation
on a man who had betrayed the most peculiar trust, and
on those who were guilty of passive complicity therein,
it must be felt to be a❑ incident worthy not only of pro-
found attention while still recent, but of a conspicuous
place in our constitutional history. Parliamentary cen-
sure, by way of deliberate and unrecinded resolution,
is the modern form of criminal proceeding for political
offences, which has gradually come to supersede the cum-
brous and clumsy method of impeachment; and it cannot
be denied that in most respects, and in the great majority
of instances, it combine, all the advantages of celerity,
certainty, and justice, which law reformers look for in their
amendments of other branches cf our Jurisprudence.
The public mind is longer divided by pity for the offender
and desire to see the offence adequately punihed.
Personal danger or pecuniary penalty no longer
plead in deprecation of our just resentment. There is
nothinee really left in question but political reputation,
and the power of doing mischief in future ; the infinite
flexibility of the ♦ocabulary of condemnation insures an
adaptation of the censure to the sin ; and once the sen-
tence is pronounced and the delinquent excluded from
further opportunities of mischief, the public resentment
is appeased without any fear of the public conscience
being subsequently troubled by remorseful qualms. In
the present case there is an universal feeling of satisfac-
tion that we have at length got rid of a bad Foreign
Minister ; and there is hardly an audible muttering of
regret in any quarter that Lord Clarendou'e administra-
tive career is closed, But a far more important question
remains. Is it only the man we have got rid of, or the
system of which he was at once the master and the slave
—the instrument and the impersonation?
Political systems, whether departmental or dynastic,
when their appointed hour is come, commonly break
dosn through the personal weakness or personal blun-
dering of him who for the time is supposed to embody
their highest pretensions. Royal statecraft was believed
to have reached the acme of perfection under Louis
Philippe. Among the monarchic maeoouvrere of Europe
he was looked up to as a model and example ; and by
every member of the covenanted service of diplomacy
( lie was hero-worshipped as the modern Ulysses. Yet it
was erophatica'ly by ths' faint-heartedness and folly of
Louis Plidippo himself that Louis Philippe-ism was
levelled to the ground. In our own country we have
witeeesed a hardly lees striking instance. Peelisin was
confessedly the invention of him whose name it bore—
a subtle, specious, cunning, and candid contrivance for
making Toryism look like Liberalism, and for substituting
expediency for truth and right. The late Sir Robert Peel
was regarded by his followers as the nearest known ap-
preach to political omniscience and infallibility. He
might not always be popular, but, according to them, in
his calculations he never could be wrong ; ho might not
always go as fast as his adversaries desired, but his party
had the comfort of knowing that they might safely go to
/sleep so long as his constant and circumspect hand was
at the helm. Yet Peerism was undermined and laid in
ruins by the very hand that had piled it together ; and
the catastrophe was effected not by any momentary act
of rashness or passion, but by the very quintessence of
furtive wisdom and smuggler-like caution of which its
indefatigable author was so proud. Yesterday has sup•
plied uswith an equally clear and palpable specimen of the
same sort of thing. Secret diplomacy with all its subter
fuges and shallows, its public sayings and private un-say-
lugs, its infinite tissue of un-reality, make-believe, evasion,
has broken down suddenly and shamefully in the hands
of the man who, above all others, was supposed to have
raised it to its highest perfection. Had some novice in
the art been thrust into Downing-street, or some favou-
rite of the popular will aceustemed to feel manfully and
speak eloquently been entrusted with the seals of the
Foreign-office, the catastrophe might have been as com-
plete ; but the lesson taught would have been far less
instructive. We should then have been told that the
danger had arisen from permitting inexpert hands to
meddle with great affairs; and every apologist of the
corrupt system would have been rea•ty to promise confi-
dently all manner of good from its resuscitation and con•
tinuance. But the specific value of what we have recently
witnessed consists in this, that the system has broken
down of itself, and in consequence of its own inherent
rottenness. It was a system of secrecy, and secrecy
has been its ruin. It was a system of double dealing,
and its ambidexterity has lost it the game. It was a
system that sought to baffle parliamentary control, and
by parliamentary censure it has been del berately con-
demned. It was a system that strove to set up oligar-
chic opinion against the national will, and it hat been
abandoned by the oligarchy in its hour of need to the
execrations of the people.
One honest, straightforward, courageous utterance of
the feelings and sentiments of the country, would have
renewed Lord Clarendon's lease of office, and reprieved,
perhaps, for a season the wretched system of which he
was the appropriate Minister. But no such expression,
ne conception of its policy or value, ever occurred to him.
M. Walowski's des' arch was not answered when it
ought to have been, because unfortunately it has not been
the custom for Parliament to supervise the conduct of our
foreign affairs, or to insist upon knowing what is doing,
or being left undone, until all inquiry is useless. Lord
Clarendo❑ relied upon his irresponsibility for impunity.
It never entered his head that ho should be called to
account within a month for any act he might commit
or leave unperformed. Had L rd Palmerston been at
the Foreign-office when the insolent missive was received,
it is not impossible that he might have penned on the
instant (though he would hardly have ventured without
consultation to transmit) a suitable reply. The ex-Pre-
mier has great fault., but they have often been redeemed
be his instinctise sense of what is right ; and a life
spent in the House of Commons has naturally kept
alive in Lim some degree of sympathy with the fear-
less and outspoken spirit of the nation. Unluckily for
Lord Clarendon,he was not bred in that best scoool
I of English statesmanship. He was reared in office,
and he has never been accustomed to any more open
atmosphere of discussion than that of the salon, the
Cabinet, and the House of Lords. It is not unworthy
of remark that throughout the whole of his five years'
I tenure of the Foreign-office, he has uniformly been
I treated with consideration and compliment in the Upper
House, and that not a single member of that assembly
appears to have uttered one syllable of remonstrauce or
protect against the doctrines set forth by him in his
recent defence of his conduct. Teo truth is, he was,
and they felt him to be, the Foreign Minister of
Oligarchy in secret league with Ab,oiutism, and they
desired to let him fall as softly as might be. Can any
might-hearted man entertain a doubt, after what has
' happened, that in future the Foreign Minister of Eng-
land ought to be a member of the Hou;e of Commons ?

[ADVERTISEMENT].—Holloway's Pills,—This medicine
bus been constantly increasing in public estimation for
years, and is now acknowledged to be the nioAt woe der-
tut remedy in the .;cirld. P. acts directly on the
system, removing ad obstructions from the str.macb,
renovating the i.prings of life :yid purifying the blood
totally eradicating liver complaints, that mainspring
of so many diseases—indigestion, loss of appetite, pain
in the side, and general del ility. It is also a remedy
Win!
Primettfiefore La,nirddCFßC:eldWii.eNsf on which the asthmatic may place the greatest de•
--.
NORFOLK CIRCUIT.—A pendance, and obtain perfect restoration to heaiti,._
SBITRY, March G.
Sold by all medicine vcrolora throughout tho world,
. at Professor liulloway's Establishments, 244 Stran•l,
Before ' LoiLdo:;, i.e .id SO, 2,la,titn-iane, Iscw lorki ; by A
ijCmilOmsulot-RiniTs:sre-e°reekcib)surrg'e.d) under I Stampa, Constantinople ; A. Guidicy, Smyrna; and E.
the 9th Gee. IV., o tp. 31, sec. 30, with the abduction Muir, Malta.

E V EINTNV j;3l C B, 1 NB.

Names of
Companies.

Ashtn &Oldh I
Birmingham
Coventry.. • •
Derby • . •
GrandJunctn
Do., 6 pr. Ct.
Grand Union
Kennt & Ave
Leeds &Livrp
Leicester....
Lcicstr &Nth
Loughborogh
Macclesfield.

Dividend
per
rr.4 Annum.

93 71. r.
40 41:
100 111
100 61. 1
100 21. pr.
10 6/. pr.
100 78.
40 63.
00 251,
'OO 51.
83 11.5!
143 701
100 21. 10
100 161.
100 -

Ncath ......
0xf0rd......

Name of Company.

Price.,

Names of
Companies.

90%
19D

Peak Forest.
, Regen t's .. • .
!Rochdale....
Stard &Won:
Stoarbrldge..
Severn and
Wye Rail.
'Warwick &
Birming.
;Warwick &
Napton..
Worcstr &
Birming.
Wilts & Brks

Berlin ..•• • ........
East London'

Do. 4 per Cent. I'ref.

Do. 5 per Cent. Pref.
Grand Junction .... • •

1.
,ss.
ct.
ct.
;d

WATER-WORKS.

Dividend
per

Do. New ••• • • •
Lambeth • • .... • • • • . •
New River Company..
Southwark & Vauxhall
West Middlesex ..
Do. Do, ..... •

Name of Company.

Hunger:ord.... ....
Southwark ......••

Ditto New of 73y p.c.
Waterloo ..... .. .. • • • .

Ditto Old Ann. of SI.

Ditto Nw ditto of 71.
Vauxhall

Annum.

51. per cnt.
6&.per cnt.
41. per cent.
51. per cent.
41. per cut.

5/. per cnt.

Name of Company

,4L. per cent.

BRIDGE

Dividend
per

Annum.

•• • • I
Od per cent.i

Commercial . • • —.. • .
Do. Preference
East and West India..
Grand flurry D. & Canal

11. 12s. Od.
11. Ss. Od.
28s.

DOCKS.

Dividend
. per

Annum.

51. pr cent.

Amount
of
Share.

s. d.
10 0 0
Stock.
25 0 0
25 0 0
50 0 0
25 0 0
100 0 0
100 0 0

100 0 0
GI 0 0
5 I 8

Amount
of
Share.

Do. Loan Notes .. ..

Do. 5 per cent. Pref.
London ..• • .••• • • •
St. Katharine • • • • • • • •
Southampton •• •• ••
Victoria .. •••••• •• ••
Ditto New •• •• •• ••

Name of Company.

X s. d.
25 0 0
11100 0 0
50 0 0
100 0 0
60 0 0
40 0 0
70 10 3

Amount
of
Share.

Gl. pr cent.
41. per cent.

51. pr cent.

Albion
.... • • • • ••
Alliance Brit. and For.

Oil. per mt.
4 per cent.
51. Oe per c.

71. per c.
71. 14s. 6d.
ii. p.c. & bs.

X s. d.
Stock.
Stock.
Stock.
100 0 0
100 0 0
25 0 0
Stock.
Stock.
50 0 0
20 0 0
20 0 0

'ANIES.

Ditto Marine .......
Athenaeum ..........
Atlas
Argus Life ... •-
British Commercial ..
Church of England ..
City of London .. •• ..
Cleric Lated.& Gen. Life
County •• •• •• • •
Crown ............ ••
Eagle..
Equity and Law......
European Life.........
Family Endowment .•
General •• .• .• ••
(Hobo • •• •• ••
Gresham' Life

153. bs
U. per cent.
71. 10s.
71. 10s.
51.
5 pr ct.& bs.
IL per share

I/. 18s.
55.
514 per cent.
11.
41. per cent.
6 per cent.
51. per cent

Do. Do.
Guardian ...... • • • • • •
Imperial Fire.........
Imperial Life .....
Indemnity Marine....
Law Fire .......... • .
Law Lite......... • •
Legal and General Life
London
London & Prov. Law..
Marine... • • .... • • • • • •
Med. Invlid & Gen. Life
Minerva • •
Monarch • • • • • • • • ....
New Equitable
Pelican
Plicenix
Profeskona Life......
Provident Life........
Rock Life ...........•
Royal Exchange
Sun Fire
Ditto Life
United Xingdom
Universal Lire ...
Victoria Life

51. per cent
121. per cent

14s.
sc.p.ct.Scbs.
2s & 2s boos
2;1. per sh.
4s. per share

18s. & bs.
I% per cent
51. per cent.
Si. per cent.
6 4 per cent

6/ p. ct.
5L per cent.
51. per cent
12% per c.
7g.
p c. &bs
p c Sc bs

it 14s.
41. & bonus.
Si & bonus.
51. & bonus

Amount
of
Share.

£ s. (1.
500 0 0
1100 0 0
100 0 0
1 0 0
50 0 .)
100 0 0
50 0 0
50 0 0
50 0 0
100 0 0
100 0 0
50 0 0
50 0 0
100 0 0
20 0 0
100 0 0
5 0 0
Stock.

20 0 0
100 0
500 0 0
100 0 0
100 0 0
100 0 0
100 0 0
50 0 0
25 0 0
50 0 0
100 0 0
50 0 0
20 0 0
5 0 0
10 0 0

TINT-STOCK

Name of Company.

Dividend
per

8 5 0
100 0 0
5 0 0
Stock.

Amount
of
Share.

Annum.

PRICES OF SHARES.

Prom the Official Last,
rUBLISIIED EVERY TUESDAY AND FRIDAY EVENINci

LONDON, FRIDAY, MAUR 3, 1858.
CANALS.

5/. Os.
17s

281
121. 108,
11. 16s.

10s.
7s. Od.

Paid.

£ 5. d.
100
all

Paid.

Price

X A. d.

Prico.

Paid.

A s. d.
Stock.

iOO 0 0
00 0 0
6 0 0
Stock.

50 "0
0
20 0 0
14 0 0

Price.

£ s, d.
50 0 0
11 0 0
25 0 0
al
5 15 0
25 0 0
5 0 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
10 0 0
10 0 0
5 0 (.
5 0
5 0 0
alai 4 0

119%

10514
94
74)si
99

Price.

47 b
50 0 0
20 0 0
30 0 0
2 10 0
13 0 0
2 10 0
12 10 0
2 0 0
12 1/ 0
2 0 0
20 0 0
2 0 0
4 0 0
1 0 0
1 0

o 10 0
10 0 0
0 10 0
all

5 10 0
10 0 0
5 0 0

365
184
129
3
63
5 1,4
38

Paid.

8
274

Price.