The Sun.
London, England, 1804-05-17 00:00:00

life KS's HALL, CLEI?E.^ENIrE'L.

SoProm, and Po.rtledvtoo;te, emi-
nent Bankers in Loitbard-streer, were indi6ted for
wilful and corruFt.perjury, committed in an affida-
vit before a Master of Chancery', oppoSing the Cer-
tific,:te of Wm.'Tnner, a bankrupt.

Mr. FIELDING, who led the case, in an eloquent
and able speech, stated the circumstances to be as
follow : Mr. Tanner became a bankrupt, having
himself been formerly a partner in the house of the
Defendants, and the Defendants under his Commis_
sion, proved. a debt of 314z1. He afterwards ap-
plied-for his Certificate, which the Defendants Op-
VOrdibefore the Chancellor, on the ground that they
claimed a debt of 30001. above what they had proved'.
The Prosecutor assigned this part of, their affidavit
as perjury, alledging, that they had never made any
such claim before the Commissioners. Mr.II.IELD-
ING said, that this would be proved, first by the
Papers under the Commission, and next by the
Oaths of Mr. Tanner, and of Mr. Charles the
Assignee, who would both swear that they attended
all the meetings of the Commissioners, and that no
stich cLim was ever made. In evidence, the pro-
ceedings under the Commissioners were put in,
which Mr. BLOFIELD, the Solicitor, said he re-
ceived from Mr. BLEASDALE, the first Solicitor
under the Commission. But it appearing that they
passed through the hands of a clerk, who was not
present, Mr. BLEASDALE was called to prove that
the proceedings were the same ; but his evidence
xtt a sneedy end to the case, for from him it ap.
mired, not only that the claim was made, but that
he was the hand whith wrote it, and gave it to the
Commisrione;s.

FFELDI*G admitted 'that he could not go
further with his case.

Messrs. GAR!).OW and ERSKINE, who attended
for the Defendants, animadverted on the iniquity of
the indictment, and Mr. FIELDING was about to
reply, when he was stopped by'Mr. MAI NW AR N
who said, " You, who are the Learned Counsel on
both sid.7s, may talk a great deal about this, to
warm the imagination ; but the Only thing that can
be said is, that this is a prosecution for Perjury,
against three Gentlemen of the City of London, of
very great eminence, and who are universally esteem-
ed ; and it appears in the result, that there was not
the least, the most distant shadow of foundation
for the prosecution. That is as much 'as can be said
oii any man."

OLD BAILEY.

FIRST DAY---WEDNEsDAY, MAY i 6.

Tests day the Sessi,ms commenced here, befoie
Mr. Justice GROsE, Btron GRAHAM, the RECOR-
DER of the City of Lindon, ar.d Mr. Alderm.tn
BOY DELL.
A very young girl, of the name of Maria Fore,
was tried for priva:ely stealing about ren yards of
printed cotton, in the shop of Mr. Johnston, of
N rton Falgate, linen:draper. It appeared, how-
ever, that the article charged in the indiament was
lying outside of theishop-door, and the girl was.ac-
quitted.
Mr. Justice GROSE observed, that there wan a
V.*Y • !I shop-keepers placiwg their
gt-.).0s outside of their doors, as, besides the temp-
tation which it afforded to persons inclined to steal,
iL Was a nuisance, inasmuch, as it was an obstruc-
t 't) to passengers on the public highway.

The next trial which was worthy of any public
notice, was that of Robert Clajton, who was charged
v ,!h stealing six silver table spoons, value 6!. the
voperty of Mr. Charles Incledon, of Covent Gar.
den Theatre, in his dwelling.house, at Brompton,
in the parish of St. Mary, Kensington, on Wednes.
day, the 9th inst. at about a- quarter after three in
ifterneon.

Mr. Incledon identified his property ; but ac-
kAowledged that some imputation of blame might
be'la'.n.l against himself, in some of the circumstances
irTii,:‘• led to the theft, and which the Court, per.
-:night be inclined to think would operate in
tf,ation of the offence with which the Prisoner
stl7-3 charged. He had been in conversation with Mr.
Cioke, the Performer ; parted with him at the door
of the forecourt or garden before his house ;. then
went to speak to a neighbour, at a little distance ;
le-tying all the doors open behind him.
Miry King, servant to the Prosecutor, described
thecircunastances which have already been mention.
64 in the Papers,'ol'her laying the cloth for dinner;
sting a stranger going out ; Missing the spoons ;
athe wiving the alarm.
.12: Taylor and L. Winter, two journeymen
painters, who were at work at a house next door,
swore to the fi.;:t of 'the • apprehension of the Pri-
sonei-, and the spoons being found upon his person,
or de;,:vered up by him ; and also that a pot of cur-
Was found in his pccket, but whose pro-
p::-.s7iat. was, or why be bad it there, not
accoun,ed for.
aMr.
RECORDER summed up the evidence to the
Jury, and stated his opinion of the point of Law in-
volved in the case before them..--Stealing to the
amount of .}ose in a dwelling house was a capital
felonr at law, and would deprive the Prisoner at the
bar of the benefit of clergy. He had been seen
going.ut of the house ; he was never our of sight
until •h property, which was sworn tcl, was found
upon his person, or given up by him. Of the fafis
he thought, there could hardly be any doubt, A 3 to
the intrinsic value of the silver, however, exclusive
of any idea of the charge of fashion, some of them
tnig!,t, perhaps, he better able to judge than Mr.
Incedon was. Upon that rested the principal part
of the case, if they .thought that the other fans were
tv,f;iently proved to convince them of the guilt of
the i-;isciner. _ _

The Jury deliberated about ten minuteN, and then
returned a verdict--Guilty of stealing Et, the amount
of 399.

Harriet Robinson, Maria Parker, Mao, Blake,
Patrick Cooling, Walter Dixon, David Fitzgerald,
Richard Lee,
,lamer Lee, William 'Prances
Turner, Ann Wilson, Edward Ting, George 11.1uz-
zark' , alias Muslin, Ann Sondell, Frederick Bove'',
and Veorge Bentley, were convidt..d of felonies ; and
were acquitted,

L A'i V RE:POi.T.

COURT OF KING's BENCH; i'vrAv 16.

PARKER k✓.

. e wife of the Plaintiff went to the shop of Mr.
Goodwin, who has two places in Holborn %vivre he
disposes of jewellery. A gold ring had been im-
pounded at the.one, which Was taken to be disposed
of at the other. The wife. and the property
were detained on suspicion, and taken before Mr.
LEACii, a Magistrate in Hatton garden. She in..
formed the Office, that her husband, the Plaintiff,
eXpeaed by a waggon certain property, which .I,e,
ing suspected to be stolen, it was the duty of the
Hatton.garden Office. to inquire into the affair,—
This duty devolved upon the Defendant.. He went
and entered into cpnversation with the Biok.keepece
at the waggon office, and intimated that he was the
proprietor of the goods; in consequence of which
the Plaintiff was deprived of his property ; and this
A6ion Was of Troyer, the Defendant having on,
lawfully converted the receipt for these goods, which
had been confided to him, to his own use.
Mr. Fitsic.trTE, for the Plaintiff, stated the foun.
dation of the aaion, and tlw injury sustained, which
he proved by a variety of Witnesse-s.
Mr. GAaRoW, for tl,o Defendant, observed,
that the nature of an Aiaion of Troyer, required
that it should be proved that the effeas, whatsoever
they might be, were .unlawfully converted to the
use of the Defendant ; cod he contended, that the
latter was only a.hling in his unicialseapacity, and
that there was nosuch illegal application of the goods.
Lord ELLtril3Ok:WG-11.-‘r In ..his case the max,
is deprived of the receipt for his goods, which goods
he could have obtained through the mediulO of that
receipt. To this extent he is injurvd. The ac"tioo
is brought in the proper form : it appears in evi-
dence, that the value of the goods was 51. or 61. and
your-verdid to that amount will probably do jOcticc.
between the parties."—Verdia fur the Plaintiff,

Having copied a statement of the following Came
from The Tina, we tae the earlicst opprtunity
of correcting the tendency of such injurious repoit:,
;-)y inserting a corred account :

SATURDAY, MAY 12.

HABEAS CORPUS.
Mr. ERSKINE, on a former day, had obt4neti
writ of liabeat Corpur, to be direaed to Mr. De
Manneville to briog into Court his daughter, Ca-
roline de Manneville, a child of eight months old.
This application was made by Mrs. Dc Manneville,
under pretence that the Father might carry it to a
distant part of England, or out of the Country,
Mr. TOPPING, an the part of Mt. De Manne-
ville, moved that the return which had been made,
to this writ might be file!.
The return was read, stared; that the Chi d
was brought up, in abedtexce to rile writ.
This beautiful and healtiit Child was brought into
Court, in the arms of a rnost tesin4table
nurse.

Mr. Tor", INC said, it was now to be dechhal
the Court how this Child was to he disp,aa' 01;
He submitted; that the Court would ot !er this
Chill to remain in the custody of ti's Father,
which ;r wt. • ; frt.? 'l'7!
rity of the case of Mr. Litten, which was before
the Court in 1771 and 1781. In that case Lord
Mansfield said, the Court cannot, at any age, take
a Child from its Father. He therefore submitted, on
the authority in that case, and of a great many
others that might he mentioned, that Mr. De
Manneville was entitled to the custody of his Child.
The writ was obtained on the idea that there was
in the atridavitean express declaration of an inten-
tion to take-this Child to France.. He had looked
over these affidavits with the greatest care and at-
tention, and could find nothing in them like such a
declaration; but only fears and apprehensions ex-
pressed by this Lady, without any one reason what-
ever assigned for them.
Lord ELLENBOROUGH here desired the Learned
Counsel en the other side to point out those parts•of
their, affidavit on which they relied.
Mr. ERFKINE, Mr. GAAROW, Mr. GIBBS, &c.,
direded the attention of the CoUrt to those parts of
their affidavits they had selecled, and commented on
them with great abilities; and Mr. GAR ROW par-
Ocularly dwelt much on Mr. De Manneville being
an alien, a -native of France, and on the cruelty of
taking the Child from its Mother, in inclement
weather, and driving it away in an open gig ; and
also stated, that Mr. De Manneville had brought
great deal of money to this Country, which he, the
Learned Counsel, did not know what he meant to
do with it. But they were not able to produce one
fa&, from which the Court could infer that Mr.
De Manneville meant to carry away-his Child. The
two principal affidavits for Mrs. Dc Manneville,
were both made -by the Lady herself, and only
stattid groundless fears and apprehensions. ,
Loral ELL1:Z7.13011.0 UGH etizerved, that ~:icse
aid nut touch any rhe Child, which
. in
to.
Meonly thirh. t;a: Courr-,• s then inquiring
Me_ TOPFIVG was heL,T-,ning, very ably, to -
statr: the affidavits which Mt: Dc Manneville
prtadueed, in answer to those on the other side,
when the Lord Chief Justice told him, as this Lady
had no ground before the Court to induce it to
grant the application, it was totally unnecessary to
give himself any trouble.
Mr. ToPr 'NG said, he was afraid that, from his
wish for the accommodation of their Lordships, and
, that public business ;night go on with convenient-
speed, he might have done injustice to his Client,
Mr. De Manneville, in-not fully stating his case,
which was supported by his own affidavit, and by
a great many others, which had been shown to the
other _ide. These affidavits, he had said', should
be filed.. They'proved, that this injured Dui op-
pressed Gentleman, for such he undoubted;: was,
was not the person that had been de7,clibetrlv. the
othr-r Side. He had affidavits from many of .he
military and commercial Characters in thi: Country,
who had 'known him many years, and c.‘..0 stated
him to be a Genticm:!n of hiah rank art ;'tOn)ur.
When Mr. TorkrYo was thus proceeding,.
Lord ELL ENnotto UGH here interpo'ed, and .!'alt,lk
no inference to the disadvantage of Ma. De
vine can be.drawn from circumstances that do rot
apply to the particular case before us. The Fdeli, r
is entitled :0 the legal custody of his Chill. It he

COURT OF CHANCERY, MAx i 4.
GODsALL 's. LORD cOURTFNAY.
RICHARDS, Counsel for Mr. Godsall, this
day produced affidavits from three eminent coach-
thakers, explanatory of the custom of the trade as to ,
the allowance of eighteen months credit, 'which was
reserved by the -Lord Chancellor when the case
came on before, on a motion for an Injunction.'
The objedion on this part of the case arose from
a letter of Mr. Godsall's to Lord Courtenay,in which
hr stated that he had allowed him eighteen months
credit upon his bills ; whereas, in fait, he had only
allowed eighteen months from the commencement of
each current year, and many of the, articles being
charged in the months of November and December,
there would consequently be upon those articles a
credit of six months only.
It was sworn in the affidavits filed on the part of
the Plaintiff, by persons who had been twenty or
thirty years in-the business, that the custom of the
trade was, alwaya to calculate the commencement of
the credit from the beginning of the current year, and'
to allow six months from the delivery of the bills at
Christmas ; and that this, according to the custom
of the trade, and the usual acceptation of the term,
was an. allowance of eighteen months credit:
Mr. IticHaaias contended, that if the point was
to 'be decided by the custom of the trade, that these
affidavits were decisive; but that in this stage of the
cause, Lord CoUrienay ought to be precluded-from
making this objeaion, on the ground of these hills
having been examined and settled, and the securities
given after the bills had been delivered, with the per-
feCt knowledge that Gedsall had allowed credit only
in the manner stated, and that it was the duty of
Lord Courtenay's Steward, when he examined these
bills, to have then objected to this mode of stating
the account,' whereas he had, in fan, recognized
and admitted the-manner of stating the account, and
no objeetion had bean'ever• Made to it.
Mr. ROMILLY, for Lord Courtenay, contended
than where the custom of trade was repugnant to the
sense of the terms used, it was impossible for a
Court to establish it, howelier positivelfit might be
sworn that such was the accepted interpretation of
the expression. Lord Couitenay could not be sup-
posed to know a coachmaker's constru4ion _of the
words, " I have given you eighteen months, credit
upon your bills;". hot must be sueposed to have taken
them in the sense the words themselves imported;
which unquestiOnahly is, that a clear credit of eigh-
teen months from the delivery of the bills had been''
allowed, before any interest was charged. With re_
seed to the argument that Lord Courtenay's Stew-
ard ought to have made the objeaian when he exa-
mined and
_sealed these hills for the purpose of as-
certaining the amount.for which the bond was to be
- given, to give any weight to it, it would be necessary
.to prove that he knew of Mr..Godsidi's statement in
Isis letter, and that Lord Courtenay had consented to
give the security and allow interest, upon the ground
of having a 'clear-cretlit of 'eighteen months. He also .
produced an affidavit from a person who had been
thirty years employed aso coach-broker, and conver-
sant with the settlement-of such accounts, which con- .
tradifted the Plaintiff's affidavits, as to the construc-
tion of this alledged custom of trade.
LOR'D CHANCELLOR.--" If this obje4lion were
taken to an account recently settled, I should cer.
tainly-have thaught myself bound to interfere,for it is
impossible to reconcile it with common sense, that a
man should say eight4rt months is given, when that
assertion does not apple ttiany one article in the bill,
or to the whole, taken colleislively ; and it signifies
nothing with me what these coachmakers swear as
to their custom of trade, for if that custom, in their
construaion of it, be repugnant to common sense, it
can never be legal, and no Court can enforce it. I
recollect a case when I sat as Lord Chief, Justice of
the Common Pleas, at Guildhall, when a custorr was
attempted to be, established by evidence, similar to
this, and I told the Jury, that if it was not reconcile-
able to principles which must govern mankind,ading
upon the plain sense of the import of words, that it
was worth nothing ; and they found a verdi4 against
it. But the point now is, - Whether Lord Courtenay
is precluded from making this objection and I
• am clearly of opinion that he is, if it shall turn out
that his Steward had:Mr. C-odsall'sletter before him
at the time that he examined these bills ; for if he
had, he has clearly recognized and established the
Plaintiff's constration of this usage. I shall, there-
fare, direct a reference to_ the Master to ascertain
this point. But the residue of the money, after de-
cluEiieg sufficient for what may be the effect of ale
ivritig the-account by a new calculation of interest,
owst he immediately ..paid to the Plaintiff'; and the
amount of the interest must be paid into Court."

EXTRACT FROM THE REPORT OF Till, COMMITTER
ON HIS MAJESTY'S CIVIL LIST RIVENUE.
FROM an examination of the AcCounts respeCting
the expenditure 'of the Civil List, it will appear,
that, as has been noticed in the preceding Reports,
the excess of Expenditure beyond the Estimate is to
he found, almost exclusively, in the Third and
Fourth Classes, and the Head of Occasional Pay.
ments.
The first of these comprizes the regularestablish-
• merit of the whole Diplomatic Body, the charge of
which for the year 18oz, will be found to exceed
the Estimate of 1786, by the sum of 19,0451. 14.9.
; and that for the year 1803, by the sum of
36,084.1, 3s. to!al.
It was observed, in the Report of last year, that
" the charge of this Class, had always, during the
years of peace, in some degree 'exceeded the Esti-
mate ; that the increase had been>progresaive, be-
ing in the first year above 40001. amounting in
1790 to near, 17,0001. and in 1792, the year ins-
mediate!), preceding the late War, to 27,0001.; that
the increase was truly stated in the' Report of 1802,
to have arisen partly from some addition to the al.
lowances of many of the Ambassadors upon the usual •
establishment, but principally from the -occasional
appointinents,of Ministers Plenipotentiary, Envoys
Extraordinary, Charge des Affaires, and Secretaries
of Legation ; for most of whom, as being only tempo-
rary, no provision was prOfessedly made in the E° ti-
mates of t 786; And it was also observed, " That the
rising importance of America since that year, had
also considerably increased the charge both in the Di-
plomatic 'and Consulate parts of that establishntent,
of which only the appointment of Consul General
,was included in that Estimate."
" That in consequence of the late Peace, which
occasioned the re-appointnaent of Ministers to
France, Spain, and Holland, the charge in 1802 had
risen to the, amount stated ; but that as several of
the most considerable of these items were taken
only for broken parts of the year, and as it might
be found necessary hereafter to revive the ,Diploma-
tic Relations of this Country, in some form or other,
with several'of those powers with whom they had
been discontinued, there seemed no reason to expert,
that if the rates of allowances should continue nearly
as ire the account of xBO2, the charge of that-Clasa,
can a permanent Peace Establishment, could be taken•
at a lower scale,. if so low, as it adually reach.
ed previous to the late War, which, as above
noticed, would exceed the Estimate by at least
27,0001." . , •
In truth, the appointment Of Ministers, conse-
quence of the Peace having taken place during the
course of-that year, and their Missions having con-
tinued through a great.. part of 1803, and that to
the Court of Spain through the whole ; while on the
other hand, the re-cornmencement of the War may
have occasioned some new appointments or increased
allowances to those before existing, neither year
can be considered entirely on the footing either
Of a Peace or War Establishment ; and it may he
thought therefore, that the fairest mode of obtaining
a proper result, would be by combining the charges
of the two last years, and taking the average of the
whole, which would make the annual charge ,
98,416 J. ; being little more than soot. above the
charge in 1792, and consequently exceeding the
Estimate in about that amount beyond the 27,0001.
calculated upon in the Report of last year.
The charge of the Fourth Class, comprising " the
Approved Bills of His Majesty's Tradesmen, Arti.
ficers, and Labourers; for any articles supplied, or
work done for His Majesty's Service," which,
from its magnitude and general excess beyond the
Estimate, particularly attracted the notice of the
former Committees, does not, in the yea under
consideration, appear to require much Additional
observation. The, charge, indeed of the Lord
Chamberlain's Department, which has usually the
most exceeded the 'Estimate, has in the last year
been reduced above 19,0001. below that of the pre.
ceding ; while that of the other branches ofahe
Household has either varied little, or has likewise
been reduced, so as or, the whole to have' amounted
to less than it has done in any year since 1799.
In the other subdivision of this Class, the article
of Printing has exceeded that of the preceding year
by, above, 70001." still leaving the charge of the
whole Class abOut 14,0001. below the amount of
the preceding year.
The charge under the head ,of Occasional Pay-
ments, which is the third objeet to which it was
proposed to_ draw the attention of the House, will
be fount to have exceeded that of the preceding_
year by the sum of 52,8961. though not to have
reached the amount of that of 1801,
The principal articles in which this excess has
arisen, will appear to be,
Deficiency of Treasury
,Fees ; Sheriff's Convic.
Lion of Felons, and Over.payments on ..:;%11" Ac-
counts, amounting together to an excess of above
'9oool. ; Law Charges 15,0001.; Extra.Exttaordi--
naries to Ministers-at Foreign Courts, including
,reimbursements for expences 'incurred and losses
sustained in His Majesty's Service abroad, above
14,0001. ; Messengers' Bills in the Departments of
the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs and the
War Department, 70001. ; and Contingencies in
,the same, 80601. Some diminution of expence ap-
pears to have taken place, but not in any item of
necessary and. constant charges.
The whole amount of the charge of the Civil List
in the last year appears to have been 1,148,8511.
exceeding that of the preceding year by 48,6911. ;
the principal articlessof which have been adverted
to in the preceding remarks on the Classes, in which
the excees has arisen, and which' difference would
have been still greater, but for the diminutito,. of
expense in some of the other Classes, %villa it has
not' been thought necessary Particuhirly to notice.
The result of the whole gives an excess above the
Estimate of 1786, of 251,4511.
This deficiency nattarally leads your Committee
to the consideration of the next object of inguiry,
the debt which has accrued since the sth of Janu-
ary 1.802 ; the particulars of which, as it now
. stands, are detailed in the act:aunt of theAppentlix

Friday morning the following circumstances oc.‘l
curred. in Holywell-lane, Shoreditch man and '
his wife, after having severely beaten their child, a
boy about eight years of age, for some trifling
fault he had committed, the cruel father threw him
out of a two pair of stairs window, by' which .he
was most dreadfully bruised, and was taken to'
Shored-itch workhouse,' where-he remains in a doubt-
Jul state. The inhuman parents were taken into
custody,
and are committed to prison until the fate
of the child is known, and pronounced- out of danger

_/*___Z_ _


L(?N 1)0N: Printed by BUCHANAN M`MILLAN (of liow-Street, Covent-Carden
P übh by WlL:.zam Aamiczx SCRIPPS, (of South Molton-street, Gro'svenor-squam);
At 'the I.spi-C)s.i, cs, No. 'll2, ; where &her/tier/7(lra, Ordtri fur the Pater, Letters for the Editor, Oast-paid), must Oc
sed

}DER. THOMPSON, Check Manufaettlrer,°fg
Penrith, witnessed an extraordinary Case of a r'•0,,,,
Lady whose Life wasdespaired of, in r deep Consurnlo.l
and was curedeby the CORDIAL BALM or GIL FA , t
Mrs. MatheWs, No. tB, Strand, London, writes, , af-
the Disorders with which a Lady of my acquaintance
hieted, 'previous to taking the 'Cordialßaliii of Gilead,
Nervous Affeetions and a very. high ,Inflammation
Lungs; attended with excessive Coughing, which re`
-i; al
her to• Death's door. She is now perfectly recovere'
,me••
though previously attended by Dr. Pitcairn, and the first.
dicat Men-, wthout . • .Wee
Mrs. Griffin, of W.atcombe,. near Blandford, fort e tee
ears of age,' was so that she could not walk out
years ofag,' was so ill that she could not wik OUt
houseand for near three years confined toiler bed with ssvi-
Net,vOlis AffeClips,,'Premblinge-Debility, Lowness (a ocre
rits, and-subject to Fits, by which she was reduced te„, cured
skeleton., A few Bottles of the CordiaFßalin of
her:— Mr. Simmonds, arßlandford, and Mr.- Shore,
cornhe, have attested this Core. d
heee
An Officer of the'th Dragoon Guards had lorige, fei°le;
jeCt to a Nervous Disorder, which a*eted his whor-„, I"rc
his, hand shook so violently, that he coold tot WT:ii-taY
Cordial Balm 'ot perfectly .cured .3:e
et
known by application to Mr. Watkins, High T°'"-1'
fOrd. inf3rlci
A Mercer, of Chester had been aMiCied fronl his slit .r
Wlth -a Nervous COmplalnt, attended witLi greet
Languor, Want of Appetite, and Lowness of r S 1-orits'eiciiog
to
st ihneess
Cordial; ti fortunately lcy hearinglead, heowf
increased so much, as to render him incapable ot att"- eficeCe -
by
the oe.
Bottles of it.—Mr. Fletcher, of Chester, will givc'
• cessaryereference. ,ether
A Lady, a few days since, called upon me, an,d.f:coc. her
that, the Coidial•Balm .of Gilead had saved the ee of 3
c r-
friend t another Lady assured me, thet she waescidelt
violent Nervous Complaint by
.e few Bottles, all ny.thitig•
she began taking it; she could scarcely attend t° 3
The above from Mr. Hazard, of Bath. ,L FAD, for
Dr. SO LOAION's CORDIAL BALM of,t-'o„ijetecaYst
atsherewsZele:tful ea few
the Weak,' the .Sickly, and the Infirm, in an, Vit sex, owill •
Debility, Lowness of Spirits, Weakness in c.'tneeineti°3s'
to youthful' finpendencies, or- Nervous C° /es-
merit stands unrivalled. !Os. 6cl. and -11,e
repered by Dr, Solomon, Liverpool, '" by which
Bottles ;, saveatter contain four et the fortoe'
Stanlp,`"ele-
P arch 3ser. s 9s. E very genuine B,,ttle earnuel '-
bears the-Proprietorii. Nateee and Address, be
mon, Liverpeol," tqirmt.ttc which is Felocu'boaor lost
N. B. The Postage or•all Letters to th
paid, and ios. fei. as a Fee, enclosed tor Advice.
d Abp
• 'f he Cordialeßalin Of Gilead, Anti-Inipetigines, .
ste JogleantbLyl,(ioctim,tlaainti, a IRt I!,,B"acahre,
New-York ; ,Mathews, No. 18, Strand, Londo ; rri
Bath, by Hazani ; Bristol, ,• Brighton, Gresj3"ii!eidte_ii..
ming-nein, KnOtt and Lloyd ; 'l3edfind, Smith ;
ebeeo, se
"1-IGanu,!bducrtg°lll;le
Simmons ; Bury Sr. Felinond's, Dingle ;
• don; Cambridge, Hodgson.; Coventry, Rollas(er.s:e
ter, Keviner ; Canterbury, Simmons ; Carur, ' clieste
it hri
Chatham, Etheringion ; Chelmsford, Clacha e;
stet', e.
Pool and Son ; Clienester, Phillipson ; Cirence college
Chippenhani, Combs ; Dublin,. Keene, No•
green; Derby, Drewry ; Durham, peiniinet.oleeel_ itose!
Neales e's•Devizes Lowe ; Dorchester, Virtue_ !olen-•:*th.ele.ceir,
Dartmouth, • fack'son ; Edinbureh, '"Gle;,rg
Exeter, rewinan and Son ; Falmouth, Liverpool' tour,
ter, Pitt, Walker ; Glasgowe Me Donald ; es Lioc_
ca:ntiliee Gazette Office ; Leeds, !mils, Hol,rny, swiefere:
Drury ; Lyon, Headley - Leicester, Greeoarrate ft
_\:!"1
Chttite J. coioss7
Lewes, 'Pitt ; Manchester, Thompsoli ;
.Ivl sgeee;ery,:_i,,
Maidstone, Walkc;; Marlbofbugh, 1-tar°la ;. reofttiainl '"311
lei, Atlee ; Newcastle, Walker, 1 It'dgs"n ' S tevens°l'torts-
Dicey ; Nottingham& Rurbage; Norwicheo
Co. ; Oxford, Jones ; Plymouth 1)oek,
mouth Belem ; 14.'eacting, Smart And CO. ; r'rNe_e;wc _oui 1.,
ington ; Preston, Sergent ; 'S";.,
I rcwsbuU s
tn, Bker ; Staltbrd, -Morgan ;
amSunpdeorland,a 13ray ; Salisbury, COli!'sj S
ley ; Taunton, Poole ; Tunbride ‘N
r,tirts,Li`i,:kr;,wr'y
rit
Evill '; Weymouth, Write! ;
Medi, tries
Wolstenhol me ; and by all
the United Kingdom.