The Sun.
London, England, 1851-07-23 00:00:00

tr=llll# mt

LONDON, WEDNESDAY, JULY 23, 1851.

In the House of Lords, last night, the adjourned debate
on the second reading of the Ecclesiastical Titles As-
sumption Bill was resumed by

The Earl of WINCHILSEA, who expressed his inten-
tion to abstain from voting on the question because, in
bis opinion, the Bill did not go far enough. All
these aggressions had been occasioned by the measure
of 1829.

Lord LYNDHURST had no doubt that the assumption of
these titles was as illegal as it was insulting. He should
vote fur the second reading of the Bill.
Lord VAux and the Earl of WICKLOW opposed the
Bill.

The Duke of NEWCASTLE contended that no aggres•
sion had taken place, neither had there been any en-
croachment on the Royal prerogative. lle should vote
against the Bill.
The Marquis of CLINRICA.RDE supported and Lord
MONTEAGLE opposed the measure.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said that it would be impos-
sible to pass over this insolent assumption of the POPE
in silence, and as a mere resolution would not meet the
requirements of the case, the only course left to pursue
was to pass some such Bill as the present.
The Earl of ST. GERMANS opposed the Bill, which
was supported by the Earl of MINT°, Earl FITZWIL.
The House
aundarthcieuiEs aorfl oLfAllNAspuouwwNicEe.plied.
LIATIsh,e
divided: the numbers were—
For the second reading—
Present
Proxies

.0 110111

For the amendment—
Present
~,
Proxies ...

... 146
... ... 119
..--265

... 26
... 12

•-- 38

Majority for the second reading ... 227
The Commons were occupied during the early sitting
in the consideration of the treatment to which Mr. Ex•
NEST JONES had been subjected during his imprisonmen
in Tothill•fields Prison.
The case was brought foward by Lord D. STUART,
who in moving for papers stated that be should next
session move for a Committee of Inquiry into the case.
Mr. W. Wr.i.xunrs said that the fault was in the law,
which left the visiting magistrates no option. Ulti-
mately the motion was withdrawn on the understanding
that such papers as could be furnished should be granted.
In the evening sitting,
Lord J. RUSSELL brought forward the motion of
which he had given notice, to the effect "that DAVID
SALoatorrs, Esq., is not entitled to vote in this House,
or to sit in this House during any debate, until he shall
take the oath of abjuration in the form appointed by law."
Mr. ANSTEY moved, by way of amendment, " That
DAVID SALOMONS, Esq., Member for the borough of
Greenwich, having sat and voted in this House without
haven taken the abjuration oath in the words contained
and set forth in the form tendered unto him at the table,
the Attorney-General of England be ordered to institute
proceedings against him at law for such default, pur-
suant to the:Act 6th Geo. ILL, c. 53."
Sir B. HALL hoped the Hon. Member for Youghal
would withdraw his amendment, in order to allow an-
other to be proposed.
Mr. ANSTEY then withdrew his amendment, and
Mr. BETHELL moved another amendment, to the
effect "That Baron LIONEL DE ROTHSCHILD and DAVID
SALOMONs, Esq., having taken the oaths in the manner
in which the House was by law bound to administer
them, they were entitled to take their seats in the House."
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL contended that the words
" on the true faith of a Christian" were part, not of the
form, bat of the substance of the oath.
Mr. J. Everts contended that the words were merely
formal.

Mr. NAPIER supported the original motion, and Mr.
AGLIONBY the amendment
Mr. H. DRUMMOND said the oath was intended to
operate against Jacobites and not against Jews.
Mr. ANSTEY supported the amendment.
_ _

Sir R. INGus contended that, even admitting that the
words in question were introduced into the oath by acci-
dent, there never was a time in which the oaths were
not administered upon some symbol that would exclude
members of the Jewish persuasion.
Upon a division, the amendment was negatived by
118 against 71. _

Mr.BniGnT suggested the appointment of a Commit-
tee to consider the question.
Lord J. RUSSELL replied that such a Committee had
been appointed last year, and had reported.
Sir B. HALL asked for delay, to give the constituency
of Greenwich an opportunity of petitioning.
Mr. G. THOMPSON supported the appointment of a
Committee.

Mr. ANSTEY moved the adjournment of the debate.
A division negatived the motion for adjournment by
190 to G 9.

Mr. G. THOMPSON moved another amendment
pledging the House forthwith to cause such alterations
to be made i❑ the form and mode of administering the
oath as should enable Mr. SALONONS to take and sub-
scribe the same.

A long and acrimonius discussion ensued, in the course
of which Lord JoHN RUSSELL pledged himself to re-
introduce the Jewish Relief Bill next session.

The motion for adjournment was negatived, on a di-
vision, by 207 against 59.
It being now nearly one o'clock, Lord J. RUSSELL,
adverting to the character which the debate had assumed,
said he would no longer oppose an adjournment of the
debate, which was accordingly adjourned until Friday.
The remaining business having been disposed of, the
House adjourned at a Quarter to Two o'clock.

The result of the division last evening in the House
of Peers, on the motion for the second reading of the
Ecclesiastical Titles Assumption Bill, ought to prove
to the Court of Rome how gross has been the decep-
tion practised on the Porn and his Ministers by
those who, to forward their own ambitious schemes
of personal aggrandizement, represented that the
aristocracy of England were favourably disposed
towards the Romish Church, and on the faith of that
representation induced the PorE to issue the arrogant
rescript which has excited the just indignation
of the whole of the Protestant, and we add
of the majority of the lay Roman Catholic, population
of these realms. Out of the whole of the aristocracy
of England assembled in the House of Lords to dis-
cuss a measure, having for its object to repel the
aggression which by interested misrepresentations
the Pors was induced to commit, only 38 could be
found who refused to concur in that measure, whilst
no less than 9.65 recorded their votes in favour of the
Bill, which emphatically declares that the POPE
shall exercise no temporal authority within these
realms. The Court of Rome must now be convinced
that the aristocracy of England does not take
its tone either from the sentimental "fine ladies,",who,
blasee by a perpetual round of dissipation, seek to
keep up the pleasing excitement of the Saturday
night's opera by the clerical histrionics of the Sunday
morning's service, or from the weak-minded but am-
bitious among the clergy, who, conscious of their
utter deficiency in all the qualities which deserve the
respect of their fellow men, endeavour by their arro-
gant pretensions to secure from their station that
deference which would never be accorded to them
for their merits. The true aristocracy of
England despises both these classes, and are not more
inclined than their fellow-countrymen to humour the
caprices of painted butterflies, or to permit themselves
to be tyrannized over, or their substance plundered
by ,the intoning drones of the social hive. The
aristocracy of England, the descendants and
representatives of those stalwart barons
who enacted the Constitutions of Claren-
don under HENRY 11., who forced Magna
Charts from JOHN, who passed the Statute of
Przemunire under RICHARD 11., and who by their
memorable resolution, Noluntus leg es Anglia mutari,
resisted, and successfully resisted, the attempts
Of a former POPE to introduce the canon
law into these realms, proved that they,
too, like their ancestors, were determined
never to submit to the degrading tyranny of a sacer-
dotal despotism, and by a majority of 227 gave a se-
cond reading to the Bill, one of the principal effects
of which will be to prevent the introduction of
the canon law into this country. The debate, which
vra3 commenced by a somewhat rambling speech
from the Earl of WiNcimx.sEA, was conducted, on
the whole, in a manner which did honour to their
Lordships' House. The speech of the night was that
of Lord LYNDHURST ; never have we heard a more
clear and convincing legal argument than that by
which he proved that the sees pretended to be erected
by this Bill_were even now only pretended and il-
legal sees, and seldom has there been a
display of eloquence more tasteful than
the concluding passages of his speech.
L YNDHURST was " himself again," the LirrinnunsT of
ten years since. The Earl of WICKLOW, who followed,
must be a nobleman of very obtuse perception ; he could
not for the life of him perceive that any real insult
had
been intended or offered by Rome. We should like
exceedingly to bear the Noble Earl f,,definition of an
insult, he evidently places a very Liberal construction
1, - •
.3V34'4i

on the adage " bear and forbear." The Duke of NEW-
CASTLE, who also opposed the Bill, did so on the not very
understandable ground that because the Church of
Rome had been always intolerant, insolent, and ag-
gressive, therefore we are bound, as we had passed
over some former aggressions, to submit to the present
one, which is tantamount to saying, that because you
do not choose to take the trouble to prosecute a
fellow who has picked your pocket, you
are bound not to resist him, should he attempt to cut
your throat. The Noble Duke also ventilated the
old fallacies on the subjectof spiritual and temporal au-
thorities, forgetting that wheresoever spiritual authority
meddles with things temporal (as it does in this in-
stance) its exercise is ipso facto the exercise of tem-
poral authority. The other speakers against the Bill
were Lord MONTBAGLE, who spoke as flippantly and
as verbosely, and as little to the purpose, as though he
were still Mr. SPRING RICE, the Chancellor of the
Exchequer, and the Earl of Sr. GERMANS, whose
speech seemed inspired by a fear of Mr. JouN REY-
NOLDS. The CHANCELLOR spoke well and ably to the
legal portion of the question, and the Earl FITZ..
WILLIAM as well and as ably to the constitutional
portion of it. We congratulate the country on the
prospect of the speedy passing of this most necessary
measure.

Towards the close of the sitting in the House of
Commons this morning it was proposed by the
CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER that the Metropo-
litan Interments Bill should be considered in Com-
mittee. In consequence, however, of some objections
to such a proceeding raised by the Hon. Gentleman
the Member for Manchester, the question was post-
poned until the sitting of this day (Wednesday). The
delay cannot be regretbd, seeing that the inquiry re-
lates to a measure which can never by any possibi-
lity work to the satisfaction of the multitude. Be-
sides which it will have to be decided whether or not
a sum of 130,0001. shall be appropriated to the carrying
out of this most inadequate project of her MA-
JesTr's Government. From the first moment the
matter referred to was brought under the considera-
tion of the Imperial Legislature, we protested against
the scheme chalked out by the Cabinet as one by no
mean calculated to remove the difficulties presenting
themselves in this particular direction to the sanitary
reformer. Clause by clause the Bill already specified
was passsed by us under review, and we in
no single instance shrank from indicatipg
what appeared to us to be the principal objec-
tions to the proposed enterprise. A reconsideration
of those objections has only tended more and more
to convince us of their reasonableness. We perceive
in the measure too many and too glaring indications
of a disposition, on the part of our administrators, to
truckle to the clerical party to admit, in our think-
ing, of any probable advantages being derived from
the suggested innovations. Hitherto it would seem
to have been imagined that the ministers of the
Christian religion should be induced, by every ima-
ginable contrivance, to exult in the calamities of
the laity, by causing them to flourish in
proportion to the annual mortality. The
burial fees have all along appeared to us to be pro-
vocative of this ghastly exultation. Hence they
have always appeared to us detestable. If we would
act in this matter in accordance with the dictates of
our divine faith, we ought most assuredly to destrOy
a system which gives the clergy a direct interest in
the deaths of their congregation. Such, however,
do not appear to be the feelings with which the
subject is regarded by her MAJNsTr's Government.
On the contrary, it would seem as though the Cabi-
net were solicitous by every means not merely to
perpetuate the abominable system alluded to, but io
connect together yet more intimately interests which,
long since, should have been altogether separated.
Already a considerable interval has elapsed sinde
the passing of the original measure relating to mt.
tropolitan interments. In speaking therefore of its
insufficiency we are speaking not from mere conjed-
ture, but from actual experience. What benefit, 4e
ask, has yet resulted to the community from this
magnanithous and magnificent interference on the
part of the Government? Have the grave-
yards of the capital been closed in conse-
quence ? Has there been any cessation B,f

that hideous practice of desecrating the sanctu-
aries of dissolution, the first disclosure of which, by
Mr. WALKER, can never be sufficiently commended ?
Are there no longer witnessed in the burial-grounds
of London and Westminster those scenes of brutality
where the sextons are made to enact the part of
ghouls, tearing to pieces the half decayed bodies of
the departed, breaking up their coffins, and huddling
together wood, flesh, and fragments of skeletons, to
be carried elsewhere, in order to make room for addi-
tional interments, so that more burial fees may be
pocketed ? Repeated paragraphs in our own columns,
recounting such detestable acts as these, will have
enabled the more observant among our readers to
aver that nowhere can be perceived the evidence of
the benefits declared to be the inevitable consequenceli
of this interference of her MAJESTY'S Government.
The graveyards of the metropolis are still employed
for purposes of sepulture. The remains of the dead
are Ail! disturbed in the manner above indicated.,
The fees arising out of these interments are still drop-
ping coin by coin into the purses of the clerical,
evaders of the law. And all these things are attribut-ii
able to the circumstance of that discretionary power
which was left with the ministers of religion by,
the enactment, a power which from the very,
outset we insisted would prove detrimental to the
interests of the population.

Aware, as they must perforce be by this time, of the
total failure of the Metropolitan Interments Bill as a
means of carrying out sanitary improvements, it
is earnestly to be hoped that the supporters of that
cause will bestir themselves at length in order to
dissipate those evils which have hitherto been
tolerated by the members of her MAJESTY'S
Government. An admirable opportunity presents
itself at the present moment for bringing about
a wholesome change in the law, such as must
satisfy even the most fastidious and exacting. It
rests with the sanitary reformers in the House of
Commons to decide whether 130,0001. shall be
granted for the purpose of enforcing a Bill, which,
when enforced, can effect no reasonable improvement,
or whether another and a very different measure shall
be introduced, prohibiting henceforth within the
precincts of the metropolis all interments whatsoever.
If we would effectually cleanse the atmosphere of the
capital from the contamination to which it is now
subjected by our unwholesome system of intramural
burials, we must extort from the Legislature some such
resolute and inexorable prohibition. Otherwise it
will be vain attempting to build up by a less strin-
gent course of proceeding a regular system of extra-
mural cemeteries. Force must be employed in the
desired direction, now that persuasion has proved so
vain as a means of bringing about the required im-
provement. We look; therefore, earnestly and
anxiously to the present deliberations of the Le-
gislature.

DESTRUCTIVE CONFLAGRATION ON THE MARQUIS
OF WESTMINSTER'S ESTATE.—Last night, about a quarter
past eleven o'clock, a fire of a very fierce and alarming
character broke out in one of the newly-erected houses be-
longing to Mr. Hutchinson, the builder in Morton-place,
Pimlico. An immediate supply of water was procured, but
before the dames could be assuaged the premises in which
they began were totally gutted, the only portions left being
the outer brick walls. The origin of the fire is not precisely
known, but the prevailing opinion of the inhabitants was
that it was the work of some vile incendiary. Owing to the
great confusion which prevailed, it was impossible to learn
whether the sufferer was insured or not. Mr. Russell, super-
intendent of the B division, with a strong body of police,
rendered essential service to the firemen by keeping a vast
crowd out of danger.
THE LATE MR. ROGERS, Q.C.—By the demise of
this gentleman, the office of Recorder of Exeter and De-
puty Judge Advocate General become vacant. Mr. Rogers
was called to the bar in 1816, and had a high repute as
author of works on the law of elections, and other legal
subjects.
Lord Stanley left town yesterday morning for
India, where his Lordship will remain until the approach of
the next session of Parliament. The Earl of Derby still re-
mains confined to his room by a severe attack of gout.
Two failures were announced at Liverpool yester-
day afternoon, the parties being Mr. G. Wright, i un., and
Messrs. T. and W. Stock. lhe liabilities of Mr. Wright are
supposed to amount to 60,0001., and those of Messrs. Stock
to about 35,0001. The suspension in each case is understood
to have bean caused by the fall in cotton.
TESTIMONIAL TO ALDERMAN THOMPSON.— On
Friday last about fifty gentlemen, connected with the ward
of Cheap, dined together at the Plough Tavern, Blackwell,
on which occasion an elegant piece of plate was presented to
Alderman Thompson, as a testimony of the estimation in
which he was held. The Alderman, in a speech of much
feeling, acknowledged the compliment paid him, and ex-
pressed the satisfaction he felt at having been adjudged by
his fellow-citizens to have performed his duty.
k

THE SHARE MARKETS

BRITIBU ICAMIV7ILYN.

Railways.

Aberdeen • • .. .. • •
Ambergate, Nottingham,
Boston, & E. Juncion
Belfast and County Down
Birming., Wolverhamp.,
and Stoar Valley ..
Birkenh., Lan.. & Chesh
June., late 331. 6s. 6d..
leo. Chest. & Birkenhd.,
501. & 251. Consolidated
Do., do., 901.
Bristol and Exeter.. ..
Caledonian
Chester and Holyhead •
Direct Lond. and Portsm.i
Dublin and Belfast Janet. I
Dublin and Kingstown
Dundalk and Enniskillen
Dundee, Perth, and Aber..l

Paid.

Nominal Prices.

9h to 93i

4% -4%

lOU - 10%

13 —ll die.

17i,
100

78 -80
414- 9%
15% - 18

deeu Junction .. • •
Do., New ..
East Anglian (251. L. &
E. and L. & D.) ..
Do. (181. E. & H.) •.1
Eastern Counties ..
Eastern Union, class A,
late E. U. shares ..
Do. do. do.

-- ••
24 —2O air.

Do. do., `B
& C shares
East Lancashire • •
Do. New quarters ..
Edinburgh and Glasgow
Edin., Perth, and Dundee
Exeter and Exmouth ..
Glasgow and South-Wert,
Do. do. G. D. & C. stack
Great Northern • • • •
Do. halves, A, deferred
Do. halves, B, 6 per ct.
Great Southern and
Western, Ireland ..
Great Western ..
Do. Now, 171.
Lancaster and Carlisle

214 -51%
N -1%
6A -6%

4% - 5

3% -3%
13% - 14

9% 3i
4%

93(
Ik 54

6 4

13% %

27 -29
5 - 6

Do. thirds • • ••'
Lancaster and Preston ..
Lancashire and Yorkshire

Do. quarter shares ..
Do. fifths • • .
Do. West Biding Union
Leeds and Thirst • •
Liverpool, Crosby, and
Southport • • • • • •
London and Blackwall
Do., Tilbury Ent. Scrip
London, Brighton, And
South Coast
London and IC.-Western
Do. do. new quarters .
Do. fifths „.

Do. 101. sh., ALIGIS Co',
London and 8.-WoBtern
Do. new 501. .. ..

Do. new 404 .. ..
Manchester, Buxton, and

Matlock •• .„ „,
Blanchester, Sheffield, &
Lincolnshire 1..
Do. Blanchester and

Lincoln Union

Midland • • • • .. • •
Do. bOl. shares .. ..

Binning & Derby
Midland Gt. Weat. (Ire.)
Newcastle an Carliale••
De. quarter shezea
Newmarket • • „„
Newport, .AbergaTeany,
and Ilereford „
Newry and Enniskillen..
Newry, Warreapoint, &'

lteatrevor •.
Norfolk • • ..
Do. New 201. shares • •
Northern Countes Uai•n
North British • • ..
North Staffordeire • •
North-Western
North & Sth :West. June.
Oxford, Worcester and
Wolverhampt4n..
Scottish Central ..
Scottish Midland ..

Do. new -- .. ..
A
Shrews. & Birnt.,Class

Do. Class 8.. . I
Shrews. & Ilerefird., Old
Do., do., Nay ..
Shrewsbury and Chester,
(Nor. W. Min. ..
Do. Halves

Do. Oswestry

Do. New..
Shropshire Unlen .. ..
paid up at per teat • •
South Devon • • ..
South-Eastern I
South Wales.. ..
South Yorksh. ald,ltiver

Shoff., Roth., anant Geole,

South Division ~
Stockton and Hartlepool
kiwaiasea l Losifior, &a.
Taw Vale Extenton
Thames Haven Doak and,

Railway .• .• ••
Vale of lieath .• ••
Waterford and alkennyi
Waterford and Lalerick,
Waterford, Wait, Wick.

and Dublin ..
West Cornwall ..
West London ..
Wkitenaven and !artless,
York, Newcastle :& Ber.

wick .- • • •• ,
Ditto and Newcastle,

16% - 16%
11% -5%
12% - 12%

Extension

Ditto---a7NTi. rainhase
York and North lidland

38 -39
3254 - 3334
13% - 14
79 -SI
IN -9% P•

SINES SEAS:

11 13 4
47%
100

100
42%

47U —47%
.. —....
934 —l% dia.
d.
10% 11%

lid %
S
12,4

634
par 4
9334 9434
121 —123
E% —EX P•
3 3)4 p.
IN, —234 p.
$234 8334
9 —8 es.
734 634 CS.

11% 11

$8 8$

%%

17X IS

AT

Ditto .. • .
Madrid and Valentia
'Karla Antonia • • ..
Ditto, New
Namur and Liege
Northern of France ..
Orleans and Bordeaux ..
Paris and Orleans ..
Paris and Rouen ••
Paris and Straabourg
Rouen and liavre
Sambre and Meuse
Tours and Nantes ..
Tonrnay, Jurbise, Lan-
, den, and Hugon
west Madero
t. '

5%
17% % g

Business done
to-day.

is
$2% 34 83

P
41% 47% 3i

93% 94 MI%
122% % 132

26% %
dlis. [97%34%
117% 34% 3534
190 2%
1134
11%

%Baia.

Ballwaya. I Paid. Nominal Prices. I/liminess dais
3
to-day.
—.---
Aberdeen • • •• • • all 1 —34 dla
Caledonian 10/. • • • 10 63( —6%
L Chester and Holyhean • • all 14% —153 L
Dund. Per. & Aber. Ju3l°z all di&
East Anglian (31 1"•)
6 per cent. .. • " all 1% 2 1%
I Eastern Counties B-t 1412”
s per cent. No. 1 • • all par —34 p x.d
, Do. No. 2 .. • • • all 34 dis Par die.
Do. New 6 p. cent• Stock 10 10% 10% 12%
Eastern Union, ScrlP
guaran. 6 per cent. • • all 12% —.13%
Do. 101. Deben. Sbaras • all •• ••
East Lancashire, 6 per
' • cent. quarter shira4 • • all •• ••
E. &W. York. Jure. 51111 all • • —• •
Edin. Per. & Dun. all 34415. par
Glasgow & 5.-W. Conaal. 100 • • "" • •
,Gt. Northern, 5 per cent. all 1334 —• 13%
Great South. & liestern
(Ireland) eighths • • • • 234 -- Ip. x.d 5% x.i.
,Lancashire and York-
shige, F. 401... • • •• 6 •• ••
De 6 per et. Stock •. 127% 1. d.
Leeds and Thirst, 6 per
cent., No. 1 •• • • 11 .. P
, Do. quarters, 1818 •• P • p
London, Brighton, and
! Senth Coast gust*. 5 per
et., late Croydon thirds •••
Do. pref., S p et. Stock,
1851, from 58/. chars. E 100 .. •••••
Do. new guar., 6 per ct. 100 .. • • 138
London &S.-W, new • 8 2% p.
Londonderry and Ennis-
killen, half shares .. 10 ..
blanch., Sherneld, and
Line., guar, slue., No. 1 all 12 •II
Do. new, 101. .. all 11% —l2
Do., 61. % p
If idland Con. 6p. e. btock 100 • • • • •
Do. Consel. Bristol &
Binning., 6 per cent... 100 129% —13034 xd x.d
Do. Bristol & Glouces. 48 ..
Norfolk Extension .. all 18 —l6 x.d
Do. guar. 5% per cent. all 434
Do. Wayeney Valley .. 2 .. —••
North Britioh ~ 5
Oaf. Wer. &W el. 151. 6 p.c 4 % % p
Shrewsbury and Birm.
New Guaranteed ~ all 1034 10%
shrews. and Ches. (Nor.
W. Min.) 8 per cent. all 14% 1534
South Devon •• all 13% 14%
South-Eastern, 4% p. et. 10 ..
Waterford &Kilkenny, 51. 1
West London, lot Cl. (101.) all ••
Do. Id Class de. (par) all •• —••
York, Newc., and Berw.,
Gt. N.of E. Par. .. all 16 163
Do. .„ 5 4 —4%
York and North Midland
H. and 8. Parch. .. • 10 1% 1 did. x.l 8% x.l.
POZEIGN.
Boulogne and Amiens all 10% 10% 15% %
Central of France (Or-
leans and 7ierzon) .. all 17 17% x.l
Demerara .. all
Dutch Rhenish 8 534 •••• 5 as,
East Indian .. .. 16 2% —2% p. x.l
Do. do. do. • . 90
Great ludian Peninsula.. all % P. 341
Ditto ditto • • .. 334 3% 4 x.l x.l.
Louvain ala Sambre .. 734 . —• •
Luxembourg • • • . I%
Madrid ai;d. 10 2
434
Valentin .. 2
Maria Antonia • • .. 1716 s Bd9 —ll
Ditto, New .. 73{ 2 —• 3
Namur and Liege .. all
Northern of France •• 16 14% 14% x.l 14% %
Orleans and Bordeaux .. 9 4% du. x.l 4% x.l.
Paris and Orleans .. all 33 —35 x.i.
Paris and Rouen all 25% 25% 25%.,
Paris and Straabonrg .. 16 8% dia. 117 rs
Rouen and Uavre all —9%
Sambre and Meuse .. all 3%
Tours and Nantes .. .. 16 9% 9 obi. xd
Tommy, Jurbiae, Lan.
den, and Llas#4ll ••• • •
Welt Mader: • 4 • 8 2 i"

...vi.
'4l;-C-g------;!)".:. -4, 4,--v-,
..,.. , , log.,
. ib . •
..., . ,c2itiii,R,,,,,,,
gii,
.; 40(,--I,l' '''l ?- ''' "17.• ~.11°'' 4,:ttigi. :40 t s , .I', '', -
Ili LT 7 t. , • Nr . re, ,
L ,
..
~
...
.. .
~,
.....
- ' '