The Sun.
London, England, 1834-06-26 00:00:00

DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK

PRICES OF STOCKS THIS
Bank Sock 216!,‘. 15
k per Cent. Red.... 91% 90% 1
3 per Cent. Cons.
3t per Cent. 98%
Ditto Red os%
New 314 per Cent lOO
1 per Cent. Ann. 17126
per Ccnt.lB9o Assent 99%
Ditto Dissented ...... 101,:
Bank Long Ann. to expire
Jan. 5, 16611 17 1-16 14
Tact.lo, 1859 17 1-Iti 171
Jan. 5, 16130 shut
Jan, 5, IRS° —
Aprils, 18.4
Jan. 5, 1870

New 5 per Cent. ..........••
Tndia Stoc& .................. shut
Ditto Bonds
South Sea Stock ............. 103%
Old Annuities ............... -
New Ditto .....................

3 per Cent Ann. 1751...... -
Ex Bills £1,000...48 50 49 pm.
Ditto 500...... 50 49 pm.
Ditto Small ............ 50 49 pm.
Ditto C0mmercia1......... 51 pm.
Ditto Advertised ......... pm.
Bank for Acc0unt.......... 216
Intl i a for Account ....•••• -
Cons. for Account ......... 92%

PRICES OP FOREIGN FUNDS THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK.
kostrian Bonds
Bl.zian Bonds lB ' Ditto Account ........... .... 2R
Ditto Account 9B , Portuguese Bonds ............ 78
Brazilian Bonds 761.2 , Ditto Account ............... 7g
Ditto Account 761,', Ditto New Bonds ..... 78
Baenos Ayres Bonds 33 Ditto Acconnt ............ 77% 8
Ditto Account 33 Prussian Bonds ............. 10114
(Milian Bonds ....., 32 11A, 2 Ditto Bonds, 1822......... 101
Ditto Account .9 Russian Bonds, In". ... 1051 i 5.;
C.ilumbian Bonds 2914 ! Ditto Account, ......... tusk;
1 )itto A ccount ' Ditto 111 ................... 10544
Ditto Bonds, 18'24 3014 Spanish Bonds, 1611 ...47k043,4
M o
'Mtn Accuti. 30 144 , Ditto Acc 47%104%
D mists lords
Ditto Accrunt 75 Ditto Account ............... 44
Greek Bonds French Rentes, Sp. c. --! —c.
!Otto Ponds, 1825 W4 '--- Exchange...... —1 --,.
Ditto Account — ' --- 3 per cent...... —f —c.
Mexican Bonds, 5 per cent 3414 -- Exchange ...... —f —,...
Ditto Account 3414 .Dutch, 2 p. c. ............... 5234 %
it• o, 6 per cent 44N !4 5 Ditto Account ............... 52N
Ditto Account 45 Ditto, 5p c. ............... 971414,
Neapolitan 91I!, Ditto Account ........ . ..... 97%

PRICES OF SHARES THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK.
Paid. Per Share
Alton Mining Company £9 1116
4 nelf. Mex. MM. ...o. (tn. ats/. pm £loo 9-
Bolatins Mining Company £l5O 127%
Brazilian Mining Company 5 I 5
Brwilian !mp. Min. Co. (iss. at 5/. pm.) £2O 37
Ditto Macaubas Cocaes 2O t 2,014
Ditto St. John Del Rey
Cata Branca Mining Company 4ft 9%
British Iron Minim? Comoanv £sl 30%
Columhicn 111inini, Co. (iss. at 5/. pm.) 52% 104.
English Thinning Company
:eneral Mining Association l2
Hibernian Mining Co. £lo 3%
Mexican Mining Co. £49% i i
weal del Monte Mining C0....(unr0g.)
Umted !Mex. Min. Co. (iss. at 21. pm.) 40
l' lan New Scrip 5
Nlliance Fire Insurance Comp. ......
Protector Insurance Comp.
Australian Co.
-anntla Company IS
General Steam Navigatien Co. l3
National Provincial Bank of England 15
Rio Doce ..., 2
Provincial Bank of Ireland .......

.£1 10 0
38
495;
15%
14
274
46};

PRICES OF IRISH STOCKS, DUBLIN, Just 23.
:Link stock — it. Patrick In.ur.(perShare
Consols, 3 tier cent.
3ov. Stock, *,', per cent. 9714 National Ditto
ili tto, New
I per Cent I Hibernian Bank 23%
:;(.),. Deb. 31.', per cent.... 90% [Provincial Ditto
Royal Canal Stock ......... 39N :itoyal Irish Mine
,3 rand Canal Stock --,lmperial Mine
City Deb. 4 per cent. — Mining Co. of Ireland
3allast Office Deb. 4u. c. —Commercial ?Anticlines —

Arrived. , Due. ATI i tett. Due.
O America 0 0 Hamburg 0
O Brazil
0 Buenos Ayres 0 0 Jamaica... ....... .... 0
O Carthagena......
I Dublin 0 , 0 Lisbon 0
O h'larde•s 0 1 0 Malta... ........... .. 0
I France 0 1 0 Sweden
1 Guerns, &Jerse,. 0 I War.,rfnrri

HIGH ‘VATILK AT LONDON BRIDGE TO MORROW.
NT orning ... 2 minutes after 6.1 Evening...t.n minutes after

-
tii
,
,

-
AV.
is
,z

LONDON,
THURSDAY EVENING, JUNE 26, 1834.

In another part of The Sun will be found
some particulars respecting the arrival of the
gallant Admiral NAPIER at Portsmouth. He
landed there on the morning of the 25th, and met
with a most triumphant and enthusiastic recep-
tion from all classes. Our correspondent, who
was pres6nt on the occasion, says, " Never,
since the landing
.of NELSON, have we wit-
nessed such a scene." We need scarcely
inform our readers that it is Admiral NAPIER'S
intention immediately to propose himself as a
candidate for Portsmouth ; still less need we
add that his success is certain, for, of course, no
one will be fool-hardy enough to enter the lists
against him. It is in happy accordance with,
what Philosopher Square would call, " the fit-
ness of things," that one of our greatest living
naval heroes should be returned for one of our
greatest naval towns. Admiral NAPIER has
been the main prop and pillar of the throne of
the young Queen of PORTUGAL ; he it was
who restored her to her capital ; who gave the
first decisive shock to the power of Don MI-

GU E L—a shock which that arch despot
never recovered, and which was not con-
fined in its stunning effects to Portugal
alone, but reacted favourably for the cause
of constitutional freedom throughout the Penin-
sula. Before " brave Charley Napier,"—as
his brother officers, with whom he is a great
favourite, familiarly call him—took an active
part in the Portuguese struggle, into which he
threw himself with all his characteristic energy,
the cause of Don PEDRO was in a sad,
see-saw condition, up one day, down
the next ; but the instant the Gallant Admiral
embarked in it, he put an end to its feeble, va-
cillating movements, gave it firmness and stabi-
lity, was its chief propelling power, and carried
it forward to a successful end. He now comes
crowned with laurel, with a name that has re-
sounded through Europe, to receive his reward
at the hands of those who know how to appre-
ciate such heroism ; and, we doubt not, will
carry into the Senate all the shrewchipss and
energy that distinguished him on the quarter-
deck.

Nothing can show more clearly the unfitness
and unwillingness of the Bishops to reform the
Church than the admission of the Archbishop
of CANTERBURY last evening, that he and the
other learned prelates had been for three years
engaged in considering the best means of abating
the evils of non-residence, and the only result
of this long consideration was, that they found
the subject full of difficulties. Was there ever
such mockery—such trifling with the reli-
gious feelings of the people as this ? We
have thoUsands of parishes without minis-
ters of religion, besides thousands where
the rector performs the duties by deputy, and
neglects the religious and moral instruction of
his flock. We see the Dissenters gaining
ground every day, not because the people of
England have any dislike to the doctrines and
services of the Established Church, but because
the clergy will not reside among them and
attend to their spiritual wants ; and though the
injustice and ruinous consequences of such a
crying grievance are apparent to every layman
in the kingdom, we find that three prelates, after
consulting and deliberating for three years,
can find out no remedy, and, only come to this
miserable conclusion, that it would be desirable
to enforce residence, if it can be done without
distressing the clergyman. This salvo—this
important word " if," explains the whole mat=

ter ; they think of the clergy and not of their
flocks ; and unless -church reform were pressed
on them from without—unless the people
were to press the subject on the Le-
gislature, and some Commoner or lay
Peer were to rouse them to a sense of their
danger, they would sit blind as owls in the
noontide sun, and only see the danger when the
whole fabric was falling in pieces around them.
Such a charge is advanced, not from hearsay
evidence, but from the showing and admission,
and the legislative conduct of the bench of
Bishops themselves. They have seats in the House
of Lords solely for the purpose of preserving the
purity, the usefulness and stability of the Church,
yet what have they done to repair its defects or
secure its stability ? Whenever the three great-
est blemishes of the Church—tithes, plurali-
ties, and non-residence--have been brought un-
der the cognizame of Parliament in the shape
of a bill, they have raised insuperable objec-
tions to almost every clause ; when the subject
has been left to themselves they have deliberated
sometimes for six months, sometimes for three
years, and either doing nothing, or produced such
an abortion as that of the Archbishop of CANTER-
BURY two years ago,when under pretence of abat-
ing the evils of pluralities, he would diminish the.
distance at which a clergyman could hold two
livings from 45 to 35 miles I When Church
Reform was pressed on them by the Govern-
ment last year, the LORD CHANCELLOR de-
clared in the house, and no bishop denied it,

•
that they deliberated for three months, and
when the Government wished to know what
progress had been made, they found that the
heads of the church had not advanced one
step, after a deliberation of three years, on
non-residence. The Archbishop admits that
the result was the same, and if they had been
blessed with the longevity of Methuselah,
and had deliberated for three hundred years,

they would have been as distant from the point
as ever. When the subject is at last brought
forward by the LORD CHANCELLOR, and a
bill introduced for abolishing two of the greatest
blemishes of the church, there is one universal
outcry against his lordship ; and their lay organ
in the house chaunts a hymn which will be re-
peated in full chorus, " he objected to every
clause in the bill." The public and Parliament
thus know what sort of ecclesiastical reform
may be expected from the high church party,
and will act accordingly. The LORD CHAN-
CELLOR appears inclined (probably from the
opposition he has received) to give up one of
the bills for this session, and the only excase
that can be admitted for this is expediency.
One bill may be carried ; but if both are urged
at once, the lateness of the session might af-
ford the anti-reform party—the great object of
their wishes—a little more delay. His Lord-
ship, however, is not a man to be deterred by
such opponents ; knowing, too, as he does,
that by passing reform he will be supported by
nearly the whole of the people 'of England,
Scotland, and Ireland, and render the most es-
sential service to the Established Church.

The small minority in the Lords on the
Jewish Emancipation Bill is ascribed to the
absence (in the expectation of a long debate)
of a great many noble lords who intended to
vote for it. Several, who were formerly op-
posed to the Jews, are now very eager friends
to their cause. Amongst them we may men-
tion one, whose prejudices have at length sub-
sided, and whose conversion cannot be deemed
a matter of trifling importance. We allude to
Lord DURHAM, who not only voted for the
bill, but would, had the division not been called
for so soon, have made a speech in its
favour. Those who know the strength of !
Lord DURHAM'S feelings, and the freedom
with which he used to express his opinions
on this question, will not despair of winning
over even the Archbishop of CANTERBURY.
The Jews should print a million copies of the
admirable speech in their favour delivered last
year by the Archbishop of DUBLIN, and cir-
Iculate them in every direction. Their cause is
just, but it can only be gained by frequent dis-
cussion, and by proving how unworthy they are
:o be degraded by their fellow-subjects.

The speech of Lord JOHN RUSSELL 011 the
Irish Tithe Bill, the other night, was one of
the best, perhaps the very best, his Lordship
ever made. No one can doubt the noble lord's
sincerity or firmness, or that he expresses the
opinions of the Cabinet on this vital question.
Sir ROBERT PEEL made, perhaps, as good a
speech on the other side as could well be made ;
but it is evident that this able debater has not
well examined the subject. There is a fallacy
in all his argumentations. He refers through-
out to the Clergy as the Church, whereas
they are merely the servants of the Church,
anpoproiginhtd and
tetorenipad
remuneration
yiote
nhfosrtate,
labourand
whciahn have
e
To enable
either do not or cannot perform•
them to make fortunes is not a religious pur-
o
be
pose
strictly; th e religioussu ehbu
te education
can religion
ion of the young
gin have
to would
do
with the excessive remuneration of individuals
even for actual service ; but where no service has
been or can be performed, it is surely irreligious,
because unjust, to appropriate that money
to personal objects, such as the enriching,
individuals or families, which would be re-
ligiously, because justly, employed in teach-
ing the poor to peruse and examine for
themselves the Holy Scriptures, the foundation
of the Christian religion. Will Sir ROBERT
PEEL, or will Mr. STANLEY affirm that to give
an individual ten thousand pounds a year, in-
stead of founding fifty schools, in each of which
five hundred children might
be taught the prin-
ciples of Christianity, is the most effectual me-
thod of diffusing the truths on which all the
hopes of man, in reference to futurity, are built?
It is too absurd to be seriously argued for a mo-
ment. The man who pretends to maintain such

an opinion, must either be excessively ignorant,
or, what is worse, dishonest.

The French Journals still continue to be
filled with election matters. Messrs. LA FI TTE
and ()DILLON BARROT, though unsuccessful
at Paris and Strasburg, have been returned by
other electoral colleges. The former, having
without his previous knowledge,
been returned for that city by a
bateeßn
great majority.
opur eni ,o Isieadd,

There is a very short answer to the attack of
the Times on the Government for not sending
away General MORENO. They have no
power to do any such thing. He can neither
be tried in this country nor expelled from it.

COURT OF CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)

ATTORNEY-GENERAL U. SHORE.
The Lord Chancellor, Mr. Justice Littledalc, and
Mr. Baron Parke, took their seats in Lincoln's Inn
Hall, at half past ten o'clock. Their lordships were
accompanied on the bench by Lord Morpeth and
Lord Lascelles, and a great number of respectable
persons crowded the Court to hear the decision in this
matter of Lady Hewley's Charity. It was fully dis-
cussed very recently before his Honour the Vice-
Chancellor, when the details were given to the public,
and the present hearing is an appeal from his Honour's.
decision. Since the appeal was lodged, the Lord
Chancellor has made many efforts to get the parties to
pass over his court, and take the question at once to
the House of Lords, whither, he was informed, it
must go, whatever might be his opinion. All
overtures, offers of facility to hear, and pledges
of immediate disposal of it in the Lords, were
however of no avail. The parties considered they had
a right to be heard here, and this was the morning ap-
pointed for it. The fund at stake is very considerable,
but probably, in the result, some parties may find that
because the fund is a large charitable fund it does not
therefore follow that it is to be greatly exhausted by
wholly unnecessary and most expensive litigation.