The Sun.
London, England, 1833-12-05 00:00:00

C OURT OF CHANCERY.-(T HIS DAY•)

BOWER V. MARAIS.
This was a case in which there had been an appeal
from a❑ order made by Sir William Grant, and also a
petition in bankruptcy, heard a considerable time agoo•
The application now was, that the costs of the assignees
might be directed to be paid out of the estate. Severa
Counsel were heard, and after a lengthened conversation
at the bar, the Court intimated that it would consider the
propriety of the application.
RING OF SPAIN V. MACHADO.
Sir EDWARD SUGDEN stated that about a fortnight ago
it was directed that this case should stand for to-day, and
that by this time the parties to whom he was opposed were
to have filed their new bill, and be prepared to enter upon
a discussion of the merits. He had been informed that
the bill had not been filed last night, and that they now
wanted them to make fresh affidavits. If they had desired
further time to file affidavits, they ought to have been in-
dustriously employing the intermediate time. Unless they
could show some satisfactory ground against it, his clients
were entitled to have the order of the Court direetinz the
payment of the money (116,0001.), upon which Lord
Eldon had put an estoppel, and to which the recent verdict
at law had given his (Sir Edward's) clients a clear right.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said it was impossible for
the Court to do justice in this case without hiving all the
facts brought before it, and that it had he'll out of the
power of his clients to get their affidavits ready by today.
The LORD CHANCELLOR gave till next Wednesday
week, and ordered the hearing to stand peremptorily for
that day.

DARE V. FLETCHER.
His LORDSHIP proceeded to hear the further arguments
in this part-heard appeal.

VICE-CHANCERY COURT-(THIS DAY.:

TINLEY V. FARWELL.

This was a petition, praying a reference to the Master
to inquire whether a gentleman of the name of Ward, one
of the trustees of the charity mentioned in the petition,
was of unsound mind, and that if the Master should so
find, the parties might be ordered to proceed in the
election of a new trustee.
A testator of the name of Charles llopetoun directed
certain altos-hous,s to be established, which he vested in
ten trustees, which number be directed always to be kept
up. The charity was established by a decree of the
Court in the year 1740, and a scheme was ~ettled by the
Court that the ten trustees should always be continued,
and that when that number was reduced to six by death,
the election of f ulr new trustees should take place. Mr.
Ward was the seventh trustee, and one of the three in
whom the estate was vested. He bad lately become bank-
rupt, and that event had preyed so much upon his mind
that his intellects had become deranged, and he was now
confined in a lunatc asylum. Under these circumstances
the present petition had become necessary.
His HONOUR immediately granted the order as prayed.

ROLLS' COURT- THIS DAY.)

there was no business for the Court to dispose of. The
Recorder, Jury, and Counsel, were all in accen ance, and
he just comphints of s, treat a waste of public time we,e
oud and d-ep, particularly from the gentlemen sumaamed
,0 serve on julies.
Af er waiting until past 10 the Jury drew up and
signe l the following memorial or remonstrance :
" To the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for
the Home Department.
4, We, the undersigned, having been serving as jurors
for the County of Middlesex for the whole of the present
sessions, beg leave to say that we feel a pleasure in doing
our duty for the good of the public, but being greatly in-
convenienced by the repeated adjournments for want of
business, feel it incumbent to submit to your Lordship
that we are tradesmen greatly depending on our own ex-
ertions at home. From the facts of the above case we are
emboldened to apply to your Lordship for a discharge,
understanding the delay to be entirely occasioned by the
unprecedented detention of the Grand Jury at Clerkenwell.
W. Sykes (Foreman) John F.lgar,
W. Smith, Barnard Smith,
Edward Taylor, William Maberley,
G. Mims, Thomas Okey,
A. C. Lindale, Hugh Metcalf,
W. Stet t :tar, Thomas Peckard,
T. Stephens, Benjamin Nicholson,
Richard Wolley, Nathaniel Rogers,
Henry James Tolley, T. W. Mills,
John Tocey, James Kewley,
Joseph Copeland, John Morris.
The memorial, thus signed, was then conveyed to the
COMMON SERGEANT, who (we believe) directed it to be
forwarded to the Home Office by the Sheriffs.
Mr. Sheriff Wilson undertook the mission, and set out
at eleven o'clock with this and two other documents from
Jurors in attendance in the New Court, to present them
to Lord Melbourne, at the Home Office.