The Sun.
London, England, 1833-11-11 00:00:00

and no fear is entertained, for the safety of the
place itself, although the troops are not strong
enough for offensive operations. There is no
authentic information of Don CARLOS by the
last arrival from Portugal; but there is no reason
to doubt the determination of the two Pretend-
ers to assist each other in their respective ope-
rations.

German papers, to the 6th inst., arrived this
morning. Their contents are not important.
There is, however, rather a curious article from
Vienna, in the Allgemeine Zeitung on the re-
ported exactions of the Pacha of EGYPT in
Syria, and the restraints which he isiposes on
British commerce. The writer attributes this
state of things to 44 the present inconsistent
British system." " They" (the British Govern-
ment) says the writer, "have everywhere the power
to act, but seem to want inclination. Had they at
once declared MEHEMET Am a rebel when he
rose up against the Porte, or had they openly
approved his conduct, benefit would have accrued
from either line of policy ; instead of this, there
was a semblance of protection given to the
Porte, while IBRAHIM was guaranteed the
Government, thus falling into a juste milieu
which has not filled the pockets of the British
merchants." We did not expect such strictures
as these under the rubric of Vienna. They are
not, however, the less entitled to attention.
The juste milieu, as it is called, is a very stupid
policy, and justly excites the derision of fo-
reigners. We can assure the Vienna correspon-
dent of the Allgenzeine Zeitung, that it is far
from being popular in this country.

- .
VIENNA,— OCT. 31.—Five per Cent. Metalliques, 93;
Four per Cent. ditto, 82k; Bank Shares, 1202.

COURT OF CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)

The LORD CHANCELLOR eat to-Jay in the Privy
Council, consequently there was no business doing in his
own Court.

ROLLS' COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

THE EARL Or DERBY V. REECE.

In this case the Earl of Derby, being a trustee of a term
to raise 5,0001. for the younger children of Sir Henry
Hawkins, instead of assigning the term for raising the
money, advanced it himself, and afterwards Sled the
present bill, for the purpose of raising the money out of
the estates. On the hearing of the cause the usual de-
cree was to take the accounts, &t. ; and the only question
now was, whether at the time of making the decree the
Court ordered the Earl to have his costs, as between
solicitor and client.

Mr. LYNCH, on behalf of the Earl, submitted that that
was pronounced by the Court.
Mr. ROLFE, for the defendants, denied that any such
order had been made.

The MASTER of the ROLLS, considering that the estate
had been put to great expense by the course adopted by
the Earl of Derby, refused to give bin] costs, as between
solicitor and client.

THE EARL OF SHAFTESBURY V. THE DUJEE OF MARL-

DOROUGH.

This case, which stood in the paper for to-day to be
spoke to, was, at the request of Mr. Tinney, ordered to
stand over for a week.

VICE-CHANCERY COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

HARDII4AN V. ELLAMES.

The arguments in this part-beard case, which came
before the Court upon plea, were resumed this morning,
and occupied a considerable portion of the time of the
Court.

The COURT was of opinion that the plea was bad, inas-
much as it did not sufficiently answer the statements in
the bill, and ordered it to he overruled.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.-(THIS DAY.)

The Court was occupied the whole morning with spe-
cial cages. Nothing of any interest had taken place when
our reporter left.

COMMON PLEAS.-(THIS DAY.)

The Court sat this morning in Banco, and took mo-
tions. Nothing possessing the least public interest up to
the time our reporter left.

EXCHEQUER CHAMBER.-(THIS DAY.)

(Sittings at Nisi Prius, before Mr. Baron VAUGHAN and
a Common Jury.)
LEWIS V. PALMER--ROBINSON V. PALMER.

These were actions upon Bills of Exchange, to the
amount of 3,0001., brought by the indorsee against the
Hon. Member for Bath, General Palmer, who was the
acceptor.

The handwriting was proved by a clerk from Cos and
Greenwood's, and the causes being undefended, verdicts
were taken for the plaintiffs to the amount of 3,0451. 10s.

WARD V. 11I‘KONE,

Mr. EARLE stated this case to the Jury. The plaintiff
was a widow, who had saved a considerable sum of money
for one in her situation. The defendant was a servant
out of place. They met at lodgings in Noel-street, Soho,
when the defendant found out that the plaintiff was in
possession of some money, and he being in • ant of it,
commenced courting her most assiduously. He 3presented
that though he was then without money, he ia.l a great
deal owing to him by gentlemen of fortune kr aq:ges, and
that by putting both together, they might live very comfort-
ably. He met with such success, that after a short time a
house was taken for them in Red Lion-street, for the furnish-
ing of which she advanced to the defendant 491. 195., at
the same time taking a promissory note for it. He would
prove the handwriting of the defendant to that note,
which would entitle him to a verdict for that sum. The
defendant did not perform his promise, but continued Ito
amuse her with hopes for the space of two years, during
which time he not only lived and boarded with her, but
borrowed many sums of money. At the end of that time,
finding the money was getting near a close, and finding
another who had more, he broke all his promises and
deserted to the other standard ; but he was not so suc-
cessful with her, for she insisted upon going to church,
before she would allow him to handle the money. lie
was now a married wan, and the plaintiff was obliged to
bring that action, in order to obtain justice.
Mr. Baron VamanArst inquired whether there was any
gentleman for the defence--was there no set-off for work
and labour done?—(A laugh.)
Mr. EARLE said the case was undefended. He sup•
posed the defendant was so ashamed of his conduct, that
he could not appear•. He then proved the hand-writing
of the promissory note for 491. 195,, money lent to the
amount of 151., lodgings and board for the two years, by
agreement Ss. 2d. per week, amounting, along with
interest on the bill, to 501.
No defence was offered, and the Jury returned a verdict
for the plaintiff—Damages 1151.

KING'S BENCH.-(THIS DAY.)

HOPPE V. LORD Dr DUNSTANVILLE.

Sir J. ScAar.Err applied to their Lordships to fix a day
for the trial of this cause. A great number of documents
were necessary to be produced upon the trial, which would
probably occupy a considerable portion of the day, and he
submitted that Thursday next would be the most couve•
nient day.
The Loan CHIEF JUSTICE said that a criminal informa-
tion was fixed for Thursday, and it was probable it would
last all day.
After some further conversation, the trial was fixed for
Thursday week.

BAIL COURT.
(Before Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE.)

IN RE ROOM.

Mr. HILL moved for an attachment against a person
named Brown, for not attending before the Court of
Quarter Sessions for the county of Stafford, pursuant to
his subpoena. An order bad been made by two magistrates
upon a person named Room to pay a certain sum of money
to a member of a friendly society, against which order
there was an appeal to the Quarter Sessions, and Brown
was subpoenaed to give evidence, but failed to do so.
The Court of Quarter Sessions bad no power to punish
for disobedience of a subpoena, but by the Act of the 45th,
George M., that Court could transmit to the Court of