The Sun.
London, England, 1833-11-14 00:00:00

LITERATURE.

4 /a.

LAN FOR DIMINISHING THE
'00.1,1 RATES IN AGRICULTURAL
DISTRICTS. BY WILLIAM ALLEN, ESQ.
This is a pamphlet written by a very bene-
ent, but we suspect, very mistaken man. It
~Qtails the mode in which the cottage land
11(1
tment plan is carried into practice upon the
io -t'aveley Estate," in the parish of Lindfield,
Sussex, by Mr. John Smith, M.P., and the
tlthor, There cannot be a doubt that an
tit°letiltural labourer will be able to get a living
b~:in, land at the worst of times ; but under-
~ng to provide all labourers with land is like
C is
to supply all labourers with work.
8
101 simple impossibility ; but the undertaking
Ithti° so for a limited time, instructing the
"uourers that they must ultimately depend
iii)011 themselves, may be beneficial. A con-
Intivance of the system could only end in re-
theetng the Fn lisp easantr to the situation of
Irish'g P
y

Con
RT OF CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY.)

IN RE LONG.
COLEMAN stated, thlt on the 23d of August last,
potikietence wis directed to the Master, to inquire who
14, be a Proper guardian to be appointed for a young
N:eleven years of age. The mother wished herself
j,aPPointed. The grandfather of the child had been
iat
bY astonished by having had an order served upon
)°bklined summarily from his Lordship on the 2el of
N,tllrretens month—no doubt by surprise upon the
ldl actually at once appointing the lady to be the
Ittirt;an. He (the learned Counsel) held in his band a
'tea Presented by the grandfather, which he was in-
lej,„%tt'l to pray might be answered for an early day, the
14; of which was to have the order discharged. An-
-40 for 'Wednesday next.
Sir t. NALDER V. HAWKINS.
4 i".IIWARD &MORN moved that the order made
'tlio,7l cause by his Honour, the Vice-Chan-
on the 23d day cf August last, might
Ityescinded, and that the present suit might be
41-trited to the master to inquire if it had been properly
?444,114teds and if it had, who would be a proper and fit
4 ti;tl to be appointed as the next friend of the Infant's,
: Place of a Mr. Browne, whose name now stood on
record as the next friend. His Honour had dismissed
11r motion, when before him, with costs. The testator,
44.41 lialder, died possessed of some personal, and, of
es,
4t) real estates. He left a widow and four chil-
Mr. Tilby, of Devizes, had been his attorney.
b"lbY had also on some occasions lent him money. A
,ahillips was called on to make the will of the testator,
ti4ingieli he had proceeded some length. Dlr. Tilby,
4511'1 by some means that Mr. Nailer was dying, went
'4l„,,''‘lth a view to obtain instructions for making the
ill'reta4""'" will. From the evidence it appeared that on the
1:lo.fi:41e of the family there was a strong objection to
er, I's being so employed. The dying man, bow-
Irsh'unn bearing of Mr. Tilby's arrival, requested that he
lh::" he shown into his room that he might make his will.
accordingly done, and Mr. Tilby made the will.
Ni‘-
041°°_,f appeared that Mr. T. knew that any other
.pro-
It 44 k`u, gentleman had been consulted or interfered on
clty L'ulect•
After the decease, it appeared to be neces-
-44,:, kccording to Mr. T.'s views, that the present bill
er
41 be filed to have the estate and effects administered
kith the direction of the Court. The Learned Counsel,
Pawh'ln was Mr. Hater, complained of this step on
Itit,rettrit of Mr. T. They stated that Mr. Browne. was
,),28 servant, living at a distance of 21 miles from the
rtY and the family, and contended the suit had been
iron Altogether fur the express purpose of putting money
T.s pocket, and that the question simply was,
tta
,et' an attorney was to be at liberty to foist himself
aid( room to get the making of a will, then to
the Property of a family into the Court of Chan-
lit:f:tkir through the medium of a third person, make
r and business of the affairs of individuals in that
his own aggrandizement ? Such a proceeding as
it iv,,-1111°14ght for, could not be advantageous to the family.
ici,n" an abuse of the practice, and a scandalous pro-
on the part of the attorney.
Pzers and Mr. RussEtr. contra. They had never
strati-
, g language at the bar so misapplied in any
tor he Vice-Chancellor had heard all the arguments
1-) and he was clearly of opinion that the suit had
,Prerly instituted, t hat Mr. T.'s conduc had
-°r„op ectt and therefore dismissed the motion,t with
,"tarot T. had been a very old friend of the
,441. • '• He had been long his confidential ad-
aad felt it to be his duty—both to his
and to his children, to go and get the w,ll
4',.,`nnnediately on hearing of his dangerous illness.
tet'ovisions of the will no one had disputed the pro-
f3ll4tf.' and it was only after Mr. T. had seen the
th' necessity for the safety of the testator's infants, to
br ,tlit instituted for the proper administration of
41`k,1°Perty under the direction of the Court, that some
tivil:44bad been found to come forward to impugn his
The and to raise objections.
arguments were not concluded when we left the

rbp
I'SRSONAL AITLICATION.
LirglinleUtti in the above case were interrupted. by a
'landing a letter to the Lord Chancellor, which he
't 1.4 d aftei wards calling the person towards him, told
th:inform Lord [name not heard] that he would
tr? it. The individual bowed, and immediately
Court in apparent great haste.

ROLLS' COURT.-(THIS DAY.)
11;4 ______,..........___
e urvr was occupied the greater part of the morn.
tt *t°
N a part-beard case Gf Elmsley v. Young, the facts
cil are of no public interest.
lh
'CHANCERY CO [)RT.—(THIS DAY.)
lilt c,..
-.tart took motions to-day.
I'll
e A ROGERS V. ROGERS.
i s h IToRNar-GENERAL applied upon motion in this
eip ..nd,R.
1 It4ti the Act of let William IV., chap. 47, tor
1401,, g the payment of debts out of real estates, for
ti4ttigh upon an infant to convey certain estates situate
' N ' in Warwickshire, the 11 0 section of that
A
iLlittilleeWering the Court to make such an order. The
,jots 4 4 instituted for the purpose of the payment
ilik,t tof the real estate, and on the case coming on
thitti, er,of the Rolls ordered the estates in question to
A:4
i at order was served upon the defendant, who
It
ttsst Y. ° convey, and the present application became
Ht Il
h ux
-14 „, °um. made the order.
C
411 the first application of the kind under the Act.
'th, quER, CHAMBER.--(THIS DAY.)
)r 1.0 ...-.......-.
it:1414; rbdui Chief Baron was expected to. sit here this
, tard . ' in consequence of a case having been only
'tt tiiiTad .the other Court yesterday, he did not take
[
ki. "-past twelve o'clock.

_ -...
\ll.
NI WAN V. SCOTT.
'l44t fr
tO
~ likAitAm in this case appeare for th plin-
a3lY for a special injunction tod restraine thea de-
-2 *hie'? selling out two sums of money of 225/. and
tjtre tr: Were vested in Bank Annuities. The plain •
I:l4.leite!ees under the will of a Mr. Joseph Taylor,
ev l'lng the above-named sums, naming Montagu
lie Jecutors. Montagu died, leaving Scott sole exe-
L tile 110 died, leaving his widow as executrix, to whose
tpiAl 14`1,1 annuities were transferred. Berme Scott died
Ilet,Zotlle bankflouprut, and the present defendant's af-
t in a rishing condition. The plaintirs

made affidavit that they were informed she intended to
sell the annuities, and they prayed for an injunction to
restrain her from so doing. and also the Bank from pay-
ing the dividends to her.---Injunction granted.

KING'S BENCH.--(THIS DAY.)