The Sun.
London, England, 1833-11-21 00:00:00

give him all municipal rights." This is pre-
cisely what we contend for, not only in the
case of London, but of every borough in
the kingdom, and we trust that the Reformers
throughout the country will exert themselves
to induce the Government to go so far.
At present there is every reason to appre-
hend that Ministers contemplate the general
adoption of the franchise of the Reform Act
in the elections under the new municipal con-
stitutions. We grant that in many cases this
would be as vast an improvement as its adoption
universally was in Scotland ; but it is not so great
an improvement as the restoration of the old
English constitutional scot and lot franchise•
A new division of the wards of London, a
different mode of electing both Aldermen and
Mayor, is suggested, with different other steps,
as a means of insuring to the citizens of Lon-
don the free enjoyment of those rights and
liberties of which a long series of accumulating
abuses have deprived them. The Committee
holds its meetings at the Guildhall Coffee-house,
and as his MAJESTY'S Commissioners begin to
take viva voce evidence at Guildhall on Tuesday
next, we would urge all who are in possession of
information which may serve the cause of Re-
form, at once to communicate with the Secretary
of the Committee.

LITERATURE.

THE GIPSEY MOTHER. LONDON, 1833.

A republication—or Victoria edition, as it is
styled—of one of Mr. Newman's old Minerva
Press novels. We have struggled hard with
our conscience, but flnd that we cannot honestly
say one word in its favour.

" Come, then, expressive silence, muse its praise I"

COURT OF CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)

IN THE MATTER OF TIIE SUITORS.

Mr. Pares appeared, upon a petition presented by a
Mr. Rennolds, who had been a clerk for 41 years in one
of the Masters' Offices, praying that, in consequence of
his ill stare of health, he might be directed to have the
retiring pension. The state of his health was supported
by affidavit.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL appeared for the suitors, and
did not object.
Pen,ion ordered, which is four-fifths of the salary.
JONES V. POWELL.

Mr. PEPYS stated that this was the case in which the
papers which had been used upon the trial at law were
ordered to be delivered to Mr. Justice PATTHSON, to en-
able him to make his report; that the papers had been
delivered yesterday, but that as no affidavit had been
made by the solicitor for the defendant* why he had not
furnished them earlier, he (Mr. Pepys) was now in a
situation to ask for the costs of the motion.

Sir E. SUODEN expressed his surprise at this statement,
and at the modest request of Counsel. The fact was,
that an affidavit bad been made by the solicitor, which he
(Sir Edward) thought the Court would consider amply
satisfactory.
The Loan CHANCIELLOR desired to have the affidavits
on both sides, that he might avail himself of an opportu-
nity:if reading them.

Mr. BAGSIIIWE wished to have a day fixed for the
hearing of the motion for the new trial.
Sir EDWARD SUDDEN suggested that the better way
would be in the first instance to obtain the Learned
Judge's notes, and then for the parties to agree out of
Court upon a day among themselves. The case was one
of immense importance in point of property, and tbe mo-
tion would in all probability take a long time.

Tile LORD CHANCELLOR said that-that would be the
better way, and whe❑ the parties had agreed upon a day
they had better mention it to the Court.

ROWE V. GUDGEON.

Sir E. SUGDEN applied for a day to be fixed for the
hearing of this motion, in which Common Law Counsel
were to attend. The case was very heavy, and would
occupy a considerable time.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, on the other side, did not
object to an early day being named.
_ _ _

The LORD CHANCELLOR ordered it to be fixed for the
26th and 28th days of the present month.

KING OF SPAIN V. MACHADO.

Sir EDWARD SIJGDEN stated that in this case Lord
Eldon had put a stop upon a large sum of money which had
b. eu deposited by Machado in the Court of Common Pleas,
upon an action being brought against him by M. Men-
dizabel in the absence of other bail. The action had now
been tried and a verdict found in favour of M. Mendizabel,
to a much greater amount than even the sum deposited.
He had therefore a motion to make for the transfer of that
money, but he understood there we►s some preliminary
objections to be taken by the Counsel on the other side,
which, if not token immediately, and a valid objection, he
(Sir Edward) desired to press on his motion.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL, on the other side, said that
his clients were under some difficulty in consequence of
the death of the King of Spain. There was a Sp iniard
here watching the cause on behalf of the King of Spain.
but he did not feel at liberty to act without orders from
his government, which he was daily in expectation of
receiving. Should he not receive those instructions
within a fortnight from this time, his clients undertook to
be ready by that time with the best case they could make.
Sir E. SuanEN expressed himself satisfied ; and here
the case rests.

The LORD CHANCELLOR rose before 12 o'clock, in
consequence of there being no business before him in
which Counsel were ready to proceed.

ROLLS' COURT.-(THIS DAY.)