The Sun.
London, England, 1833-07-23 00:00:00

" THE PATENT OBLIQUE PEN, THE ONLY
STRAIGHT PEN."
THE PATENT OBLIQUE PEN is
now acknowledged by the first writers of the sae,
to be the beat in principle and the most free and perfect
in °tie, of any metallic Pen hitherto offered to the notice of
the Public.
The Principle of the Patent Oblique Pen is in the posi-
tion of the slit, which being parallel to the usual slope of
Willing, several unequalled properties follow as conse
qeenees of this first principle, of which it has been said by
celebrated penman and mathematician " the Oblique
Pen is the only straight pen."
ihe most flattering testimonials were presented to the
Proprietors of this Pen on its first introduction to public
notice, as Well by private individuals as by the public
Press. Since that time, however, they have improved its
quality ;0
per-
fection, viz.,
point most important and essential to its per-
its elasticity. The sides of the Pen are now
dt..._de_ pat instead of round, and the elasticity being now
~Pennent only on the form and principle of the Pen, and
ROLLED-'e thickness of the metal, which is THE BEST
STEEL, and not on a number of slits or holes,
fli'xibilitYs like that of a common quill, is greatest pre-
the L the part where it is most required, viz., near
sidur:lats, decreasing with the increasing breadth of the
t In thus combining the flexibility of a quill wi, h the only
rue direction of the alit in the Patent Oblique Pen, the
utmost perfection has been obtained in this invaluable
tnetr p
't is with the greatest confidence, therefore, that the
cstentees recommend the Patent Oblique Pen to the no-
,
tLieee of the
re Publ. satisfied that it is the most perfect hi-
iklt° offd.
tatiattfactured by S. Mordan and Co., Patentees, 22,
ae- treat, Finsbury.
FRAUDULENT IMITATION OF
TILES
MARKS, AND SALES OF SPURIOUS AR-
OF CUTLERY.
BEFORE THE VICE-CHANCELLOR,
WEDNESDAY, MAY 29, 1833.
m WILSON V. WILSON AND SOUTHERN.
le h 7 r• KEN VON
PARKER-•-." Will your Honour give me
to move for a special injunction ?"
IbTbe VICE-CHANCELLOR (seeing articles of cutlery upon
's table) said—" What, in a cutlery case ?''
spwritrs PARKER—" Yes, Sir ; in a case in which lohn
n',Za is the plaintiff, and George Wilson and Francis.
tio°,ern are the defendants, I have to ask for an injunc-
W7Ca special injunction, to restrain the defendants,
eer2ll and Southern, from manufacturing, selling, or;
Isl',lugt any knives with the name or mark, ' I. Wilson,
ar''' a crown reversed thereon, or with any other name
the atk in imitation of the name or mark stamped on
Panives manufactured by the plaintiff. What I now
;‘,70",i„.r, is ex-parte, and I do it upon the affidavit of the
rind'l", which states, that his father for many years car-
had ea the business of knife-manfacturer, at Sheffield, and
teb,ra,equired great celebrity in his business, more parti-
'Y in the manufacture of knives used by persons car-
as
lvon the trades of shoemakers, butchers, cooks, bakers,
tiew arious other trades which required knives of a par-
him t or pattern ; that the knives manufactured by
than Were highly esteemed, and fetched a greater price
the continents
of other manufacturers, both in England and
The
Continents of Europe and America."
th e VICE-CHANCELLOR_" Which, Mr. Parker, are
el‘fenuine knives ?"
PARKER--" The genuine knives, Sir, are marked
am_ a figure one; the spurious ones are marked with a
1347. The affidavit then, Sir, proceeds to state, that the
sh'elltiff, ever since the death of his father, had carried on
b ht in the same manner as it had been carried on
hl,ntrn ; that the knives manufactured by deponent were
eki in equally high estimation with those manufactured
k the father, and were in great request, and fetched a
higher price than those of other manufacturers - that the
knives manufactured by the father of the deponent were
Ramped with the mark composed of four pepper-corns.
den% know whether your Honour can clearly distinguish
hitt,
The vic.-cHANc.,,LO.—,, 0 yes."
Ales PARXER.--." Followed by a diamond upon the
blade
of each knife. The deponent, on his father's death,
tbeted that mark, and has ever since continued to use
e same with the addition of his name, and the words
!a4t warranted,' and shear steel,' and the first
lettterr of
his
Christian name, I. WILSON,' in capital
„wit a, also stamped upon the blades of certain knives ma-
taoeftlited by deponent, and by such marks the knives
and usilet:reet by deponent's father were formerly known,
arisen, e manufactured by deponent are now known
tent) dealers as being the knives manufactured by depo-
_an and distinguished frem knives manufactured by other
rtuticrui acturers, and that knives be ring such marks are
The
Y boners and
being knives manufactured by deponent.
einceaffidavit then goes on to state, that about three years
the t,) the defendant, George Wilson, who then carried on
flo, llaineas of a cutler and knife manufacturer at Shef-
to th eaOrnenced a manufacture of certain knives similar
tumitnile made by deponent, and stamped or marked with
' apoue !Millar to the marks used by the deponent; and
htleerrering such fraud, deponent caused it to be re-
aitted-Td to the said George Wilson, that unless lie de-
neat 'timla manufacturing knives with the mark of depo-
agaiNtturreon, legal proceedings would be commenced
there; him to compel him to du so, or to that effect, and
reeN"Pon the said George Wilson entered into an agree-
so (litil deponent not to manufacture any more knives
"tIV.A Is
Th,
%tee, ICE-CHANCELLOR" What is the date of the
sir' at, Alr. Parker?"
affirlas•V4RXEß.essa" About three years ago, Sir. The
rine :it then proceeds to state, that George Wilson had
thrY4e,;_i.nt° partnership with i Southern, and that
14the AruirV on the business of cutlers at Sheffield, under
f t 'Wilson and Southern;' that they had lately
Illat-liret%aketarsed certain knives known by the description of
and ib eta knives, butchers' knives, and cooks' knives,
'toll °7l2lthiltd them with the marks, name, &c., in im
1104 e Marks by which knives of the same descrip-
. It
"Vetn, five and sold by the plaintiff for the last
,Ind 11;•"tee years and upwards, are and have been stamped,
aisle% 4,,,,e1°1.rna similar to the form in which the plaintiff's
'reeler o Marked. The affidavit then, Sir, proceeds to
The l'earks.o
the let
irtle eUANCELLOR..-" There can be no doubt of
Y ; it a
sur,
Appears perfectly manifest to me."
"t di "1." Then, Sir, we take the injunction ac-
The' to the ?"
v prayer of the bill
entertain a
Yes ; it is impossible to
la 4 doubt about it."

MARRIED.
btgsp,
On the 17th inst., at St. George's, Hanover-sq-
u
W. Seller, youngest son of Mr. James Seller, Arad'
to Miss Wright, of Cumberland. nf
On oth inst., at St. Clement Danes, Walter
to Matilda, third daughter of the late Captain John 11:tel
On the 13th inst., at Westbury-on-Severn, Glouceoo,p
31
George Richmond, of Clapham, son of the late Th° to'
mond, Esq., of Hope-house, in the county of Durhaol'et,
only daughter of Captain Humble of the aforesaid Pla