The Sun.
London, England, 1834-06-24 00:00:00

BANKRUPTS.

ROBERT COWAN, schoolmaster, Plumstead, Kent,
to 'surrender July 2, at one, and Aug. 5, at ,twelve, at
the-Court of Bankruptcy. Edwards, Pancras-lane, offi-
cial assignee ; Nokes, Woolwich.
THOMAS HODSOLL, pictUre-dealer, Garnault-
plthe, Spa-fields, July 7, at one, and Aug. 5, at eleven,
--at the Court of Bankruptch. Edwards, Pancras-lane, of-
ficial assigne ; Constable and Kirk, Symond'r Inn, Chan-
cery-lane.
ROGER WHITEHEAD, attorney, Liverpool, July
18, and Aug,. 5, at one, at the Clarendon-Rooms, Liver-
tool. Blacistock, Bunce, and Vincent, King's Bench-
alk, Temple, London • Curry, Liverpool.
tHARLES WHYBOROIJG H, victualler, Manches-
ter; July 10, at ten, and August 5, at two, at the Com-
missioners'-rooms, Manchester. Appleby and. Charnock,
Gray's Inn, London ; Oliver, Manchester.
SOLOMON COHEN, factor and jeweller, Binning-
ham, July 4, and August 5, at one, at the New Royal
Hotel, Birmingham. Norton and Chaplin, Gray's Inn-
square, London ; Harrison, Birmingham
JOHN JAMES, innkeeper, Blandford- Forum, Dorset-
shire, July 7, and August 5, at eleven, at the Greyhound
Inn, Blandford-Forum. 'Dean, Guildford-street, Middle-
sex.

. _
FIEILBY LEE, soap-boiler, Selby, Yorkshire July 4,
and August 5, at two, at the Kingston Hotel, Kingston-
upon-Hull. Hicks and Marris, Gray's Inn-square, Lon-
Holden and Galloway, Hull.
SAMUEL CHAPMAN, cotton-spinner, Hurst, Lan-
cashire, July 10, and Aug. 5, at ten, at dornmissioners'-
rooms; Manchester. Adlington, Gregory, and Faulkner,
Bedford-row, London ; Claye and Thompson, Manchester.
EDWARD ELAISALL DAY, surgeon, Bristol, July 8,
and Aug. 5, at one, at the Commercial-rooms, Bristol.
"• 'like and Whitmore, Bedford-row, London ; Bridges,
Bristol.
EDWARD GRIFFIN, surgeon, Erdington, Warwick-
• te, July 4, and Aug. 5, at twelve, at the Union Inn,
Holme, Frampton, and Loftus, New Inn,
London Parker, Birmingham.
THOMAS UNT, scissor manufacturer, Sheffield,
"V I, and August 5, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy.
Abbott, official assignee, King's Arms-yard, Coleman-
street ; Trehern and White, Leadenhall-street.
JOSEPH WALSH, cotton-manufacturer, Warrington,
Lancashire, July 11, at ten, and August 5, at two, at the
Be
ner, Bedford-row London ; Nicholson, Warrington.
Manchester. Gregory and Faulk-
JOHN 1311LAIER, merchant, Hart 1, Durham, July
'25, at eleven, and August 5, at one, at the Commissioners'
Room, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Williamson and Hill,
Verulam-buildings, Gray's_inn:
castle-upon- Tyne. London ; Ingledew, New-
WILLIAM WILLS, builder, Exeter, July 15, and
August 5, at twelve, at the Half Moon Inn, Exeter.
Clowcs, Orme, and Wedlake, King's-Bench-Walk,
Temple, London ; Laidman, Bampfylde-street, Exeter.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT,
THIS EVENING.

HOUSE OF LORDS.
”ifs house met shortly after four o'clock.
P°l/VELL'S DIVORCE BILL.
-Witnesses Were bein examined upon this bill,
when the- LORD CHANCELLOR inquired if
process of outlaweY had been served upon the
defendant, and upon being informed
that it had not,
the. house upon the-
Ch!tileellOr; d recommendation of the Lord
or-ere- the proceedings to stand over, in

The Bishop of L L A ND A FF said. that in presenting
petitions intrusted to him against the claims of the
Dissenters he was anxious to redress, what his opinions
were and the ground upon which be intended to
support the prayer 'of the petition, and he begged
to state that he was not actuated, and neither
were the petitioners actuated by any ill=feeling
towards the parties against whom the petition was
directed. (Fear.) The first ground .he took was
agaiast the admission of the Dissenters to the
degrees of the Universities ; secondly, and which he
believed was indisputable, that religion was an essen-
tial part of education, and that the admission of per-
sons indiscrinately, without regard to their religious
opinions was destructive of that principle, for it was.
impossible to contend, with any degree of truth,
that persons could be admitted, of various religious
persuasions, without abandoning that most sa-
cred branch of education—religion. ( Hear, hear.)
In his opinion it was most desirable to make religion
a permanent branch of education. (Hear, hear.) He
wished to see religion and education go hand in hapl.
The LORD CHANCELLOR agreed with the
right reverend prelate that nothing was more
desirable than that education and religion should go
hand in hand. No man concurred more than
he did in the course adopted by the Universi-
ties of Oxford and Cambridge, and King's
Col-
lege, to admit no persons but those who belonged
to the church within their walls, but that was no reason
wby the Dissenters, a large and oppulent body,
should not have a University for themselves, and
it was no reason why the Eondon University
should be closed against Dissenters. In his opinion
the man who would say that it was unfair to found a
university for Dissenters was more fit for a musuem
than rational society. ( Laughter.)
The Bishop of L AND AFF begged to correct the
noble and learned lord : he had never made any ob-
servation against the London University.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said that over
the way (Westminster Abbey) they had heard
duetts and trios, but it was general in that house to
speak one at a time. As he had said before, local
parties agreed in every respect with the sentiments of
the church, he advised them to go to King's College
but where they did not they had surely the right of
being educated at the London University.
The Bishop of L A NDAFF was sure that the
strictures of the noble and learned lord upon the address
he had made was founded upon an inattention of the
statements he had made. .He had brought no,charge
whatever against the London University.
The Duke of WELLINGTON considered that
nothing could be more inconvenient than discussing
subjects of the importance of the present upon the
presentation of petitions. He should have thought
that the noble lord on the woolsack would have
extended his protection to the Universities rather than
cavil with the sentiments expressed by the right rev.
Prelate.

The LORD CHANCELLOR must say, if
the noble Duke had acquired logic at the Uni-
versity of Oxford (hear), he had not acquired
the faculty of attention. If the noble duke had at-
tended to what he stated, he would not have made the
observations he had done. With respect to the charge
made by the noble duke against him of raising a
debate on the presentation of a petition, he had only
to say, and he was sure the hon. duke was not aware
that the right rev. prelate had attacked him in his own
words. He bad always been a great friend to the
London University, though he was, perhaps, not so
great a man there as the noble duke was at Oxford.
He had no doubt that his presence at Oxford would
not have created a greater sensation of astonish-
ment than his Royal Highness' presence at their
meetings at the university. ( Hear, hear, andlaughter.)
He believed his Royal Highness had been invited to
attend ( Continued laughter), and although he
had not attended, he (the Lord Chancellor)
had no doubt but that the university
had had the illustrious Duke's good wishes, as far at
least as his conscience would allow him. On one
occasion, however, when there was an illustrious
branch of the Royal family present, and when
his noble friend the Secretary of the Home Der art-
ment were present also, upon that occasion, and upon
a former occasion, when all the subscribers
were together, he had mentioned Oxford and
Cambridge in terms of the greatest respect. He
asserted that as a fact, and that toention was received
with applause, end the mention of Oxford produced
not one indistinct expression of disrespect- on
that occasion. They ordered things on the bnnks
of the Isis, for when certain individuals were
absent, and in the . cool of those shady retreats
of the Muses, who haunted that classical stream, in
the morning, when the mind was perfectly free from
vapor,• except that of theological controversy, and po-
litical opinion,—upon the occasion of the late in-
stallation, unrestrained by the presence of
noble and illustrious Dukes, Doctors in Divinity,
archbishops and bishops—unrestrained by any such
presence, when mention was made of certain names,—
very harmlessly and innocently—an ancient and
established practice, of which he was the last per-
son in the world to complain, was resorted to on
that occasion. He would say nothing of it, except
that it consisted in naming certain individuals, for the
purpose of expressing feelings of respect or disrespect
towards them ; and as those'-games were mentioned,
those feelings got vent in the most convenient form.
(LEFT SITTING.)