The Sun.
London, England, 1833-08-23 00:00:00

MINERAL SUCCEDANEUIII FOR FILLING DE-
CAYED TEETH, without Heat or Pressure, and IN-
CORRODIBLE ARTIFICIAL TEETH, without
Wires or other Ligatures.

1 J ONSIEUIi MALLAN and SONS, Sur-
-1:f geon-Dentists, No. 32, GREAT RUSSELL-
STREET, BLOOMSBURY, and No. 9, HALF-MOON-
STREET, PICCADILLY, grateful for the high and
extensive patronage which has so eminently distinguished
their professional exertions since their arrival in the British
Metropolis, respectfully announce to their Friends and the
Public in general, that they still continue to restore DE-
CAYED TEETH, with their celebrated MINERAL
SUCCEDANEUM, so universally recommended by the
Faculty of London and Paris. The operation of Filling
Teeth is performed in a few seconds, without the slightest
pain, heat, or pressure. They also FASTEN LOOSE
TEETH, in a manner singularly efficacious, and SUPPLY
WHOLE or PARTIAL SETS of TEETH formed of the
above INCORRODIBLE MINERAL, or of Natural Sub-
stances, without WIRE or other LlGATURES—guarsn-
t!!ed to answer every purpose for Articulating and Masti-
cating.
The Faculty are respectfully invited to witness the suc-
cessful result of the Mineral Succedaneum.

N.B. One of the above firm may be consulted Mon-
days and Thursdays, for a short period, at Mrs. Short's,
King's-street, Great Yarmouth ; and the intermediate
days, at Mr. Cutchfield's, Market-place, Norwich.
Charges as in Paris.

THE UNITED SERVICE JOURNAL.—The
Number for August of this highly popular Mkt]lany corn•
pletes the Second Volume for the present year, which
may accordingly now be had of every booffseller. Among
the variety of interesting matters treated of as particularly
deserving attention may be enumerated the following :
The influence of Colonies on maritime and military ascen-
dancy—Military establishment of Germany—British Ca-
valry in the Peninsula—Siege of Badajoz—The crisis of
Turkey—On the overland invasion of India—Revised
movements of Cavalry—On steam navigation—Pay of
Officers in India and England—The West India Question,
as connected with our naval superiority—The crisis and
close of the action at Waterloo (with a Map)—Memoir
of the Defence of Canada, 1833 (with a Map—The Jamaica
Station—Utility and economy of the West India Regiments
—On Military Costume—Proposed establishment for the
board and education of the Sons of Naval Officers—
and Memoirs of the services of the Earl of Pomfret,
General Sir Robert Brownrigg, Major-General Sir John
Malcolm, and Vice-Admiral Sir E. J. Foote.

A MOST DISTRESSING CASE.--PREMA-
TURE LABOUR, IN THE STREET.—On Wednesday morn-
n2, about eight o'clock, a female of the most wretched
appearance, destitute even of the necessary articles to cover
her nakedness, was observed going from house to house
apparently soliciring alms. It turned out, however, that
she was making known her situation (being then in the
pains of labour), and begging temporary accommodation
during her confinement, which was invariably refused,
owing, perhaps to the miserable and dirty appearance of
the unfortunate app!icant. Having reached Charles-
street, Westminster-road, being then quite exhausted, and
evidently in great pain, she fell on the pavement, and
gave birth to a living child ! The prompt and humane
attendance of Mr. Hooper, of the London-road, and the
praiseworthy assistance of the respectable females near the
shot, procured for the poor woman whatever assistance
could then he rendered. She was eventually placed in a
returned chaise, which happened to be passing at the
time, and removed to the workhouse, where she iS now.
She is expected to recover.

HOUSE OF COMMONS. Auousr 22.
TITHES STAY OF SUITS BILL.
, Mr. D. W. HARVEY, in continuation from The Sun
of yesterday, said—
If they did not belong to the Church, they did not be.
long to the landlord, but they were a property which he
was sorry to see a disposition in that House to fritter away;
and he was very sorry to see landlords endeavouring to
excite those feelings and produce those results which
were now working in Ireland. He was one who would
stand up for tithe property, and he viewed with appre-
hension those assiduous attacks which were being made
upon it. If they were to have a Bill, they ought to
have an efficient one.—(Hear, bear.) The object of
, it was to prevent adverse litigation till the next Session
of Parliament. Now nothing could be done till Novem-
ber, and though he was against the Bill in principle, yet
under all the circumstances, if they were to have such a
13;11 at all, he was an advocate for a Bill which would do
away with all such proceedings as had been instituted
within a given time.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said he must congra-
tulate the Church and the Clergy on their new defender.
The Hon. Member bad said no action could be brought
unless it was upon a modus that could be clearly shown
the parties had been in possession of for a series of years.
Now he could tell the Honourable Member, a modus had
been set aside within the last twa years, which was proved
to have existed for more than a hundred years—it was
proved that it had taken its origin in the reign preceding
that of Edward I. New, he did not call that justice, but
gross injustice, and contrary to all rules of jurisprudence,
which had guided every civilized country. He did not see
what good could result from suspending the proceedings
under this Bill till the next session of Parliament.
He thought it was for the benefit of the Church that the
Bill should pass, because they did not put an end to the
suits, but merely staved them, while in the mean time
Gentlemen would proceed with the Tithe Commutation
Bill.
Sir R. INGLIS did not know what the Hon. and
Learned Solicitor-General meant by talking of the injus-
tice of a decision where a modus was set aside, because it
was not traced back till the time of Richard the First's
return from the holy wars. Neither did he understand
the cheer with which it was received by the H•;use. That
decision was according to the law. The Bill was a gross
violation of the law, and the rights of parties.
Mr. COBBETT said the Hon. Bart. talked largely of
the injustice of the Bill, and as he was by office the de
fender and advocateef the clergy, of coarse theargutnent was
to be taken as theirs. Now, he had a precedent for the Bill,
and one too to which the clergy were parties. In 1796, or
1797, upwards of 1,000 actions were commenced in the
King's Bench against clergymen for penalties for non-resi-
dence, and what did the clergy do? Come forward and
pay the penalties, and so stop the suit? No, they cam::
before the then Parliament, and got the actions stayed for
a year. Next year the same, and the text year again. Then
in 1802 Parliament did what he hoped that House would do
next session, quash the actions entirely, and as they re-
lieved the clergy frotn the penalties, now relieve the peoele
from the payment of tithes. It was idle to talk of its
being an invasion of the principles of law, for the case
was one of strong necessity.
Mr. W. BROUGHAM agreed with Hon. Members
that the Bill was an infraction of the law ; but he would
ask, was it not a case of the strongest necessity ? The
number of actions had been multiplied so enormously,
tat great injustice must be the consequence if the Bill
were not passed.—(Hear, hear.) He was informed that
in the Exchequer alone there bad been upwards of 4,000
writs issued within the last two years, making with those
in other Courts 8,000 in all—if ever there was a case of
stern necessity that was it. He would ask what right
the Rector of Kendal hod to 10,0001. a year of tithe',
he must he beat in nine out of every ten of the
actions. It was clear that they had only been sum-
moned in order to save the right which otherwise
Lord Tenterden's Act would have taken away. He
should be sorry to interfere between justice and those
who would have brought their actions, if Lord Tenter.
den's Act had never passed, but as the suits in question
had been instituted, as he believed, merely for the pur-
pose of defeating the operation of that Act, the easiest,
fairest, and most convenient method of proceeding would
be, to suspend them till next session, or some more dis-
tant
period.
Mr. AGLIONBY explained.
Mr. LYNCH extended his amendment to six months
from the Ist day of February last.
Mr. BLAMIRE said it was almost impossible to state
precisely, until the returns were laid on the table, the
exact number of suits which had been instituted under
the Act ; but he knew from the communications which
he personally had with different parts of the country, that
thirteen counties were in the state he had before described,
and that the number of suite would probably turn out to
be not less than 9,000.
The amendment was then put and agreed to.
The clause, as amended, was then ordered to stand part
of the Bill.
In place of the 4th clause, which was omitted,
Mr. LYNCH proposed one to this effect:—That for
any party or parties to a suit or suits which had been
suspended, should there be danger of injuring their claims
in consequence of material evidence in favour of it being
liable to be lost in consequence of the suspension of the
suits, it should be lawful, to the extent of that evidence,
to proceed so far in the suit.
The amendment, with a verbal amendment extending
it to actions at law, as well as suits in Chancery, was then
agreed to, and ordered to stand part of the Bill. On the
preamble being put,
Mr. TOOK proposed a proviso that the Bill should not
apply to actions or suits which had been bona fide set
down for hearing before the bill had passed.
Mr. WARBURTON, Mr. K. TYNTE, and Mr.
O'REILLY opposed the clause.
Lord ALTHORP said it would very much interfere
with the clauses and main objects of the Bill.
Mr. TOOKE thereupon withdrew the amendment.
The preamble was agreed to; the House resumed ; the
Chairman brought up the report, which was received and
ordered to be further considered to-morrow.
On the motion of Mr. STANLEY the Lords' amend-
ments to the Slavery Abolition Bill were read a second
time.
The House then went into Committee on the Infir-
maries (Ireland) Bill, Mr. EWA RT in the chair.
The several clauses were agreed to, with trifling verbal
amendments.
Mr. WALKER moved the addition of a new clause as
to the qualifications and payment of medical men.
Mr. WARBURTON objected to the clause, as it only
went partially to remove restrictions upon medical men,
and he hoped early next Session that all the restrictions
would be removed by one Bill.
Mr. O'REILLY objected to the clause.
After some further discussion, between Mr. Walker,
Mr. S. Rice, Mr. O'Reilly, and Mr. Warburton, the
clause was ordered to be added to the Bill.
The House then resumed, and the report ordered to be
received to-morrow.
Mr. COBBETT rose to make the follewing motion,
" that there be laid before this House a return of all per-
sons who we re imprisoned in Great Britain in virtue of
the Act of 1817, (57 Geo. 8, chap. 3) stating
with regard to each person, separately, Ist,
his name ; 2ndly, his place of abode, at
the time of his arrest; 3d, the prison or different pri-
sons in which he was confined ; 4th, the date of his
commitment; sth, the date of his discharge from
prison; 6th, the ground of his commitment; and 7th,
the name or names of the persona who signed hie com-
mitment;" also, for a copy of a circular letter
which was addressed by Lord Viscount Sidmouth
to the Lords Lieutenant of Counties, and which was
dated " Whitehall, 27th March, 1817 ;" also for a copy
of the letter which was addressed by the said Lord Vis-
count Sidmouth to the Earl of Derby, dated 21st Aug.,
1819, "directing the said Earl to thank the Magistrates
who acted at Manchester on the 16th August, 181 D,
where and when many of his Majesty's subjects were
fkilled ah
iwoottnded." The Ho
itonopposed,n
he would
nlAemhr
dlnotnetasid
state any
yuns
grounds
he
for his making it.
bellB lurg.
gLesAtedMßtosnaeidandedewdetuoldonnottpooprroasse
ttohethemgortoiounn, but
dsof
uonrd,i s ;
s at
tt
all.—(Laughter.)
unlikely
ku
ega
lebyttethrhe. samethat
Hleeswhc
would
uun
ddd
commitmenntfdor a nh theseye
thought
grounds
bbee
agbiTeento.'fi'
also suggest the omission of the words " where and when
many of his Majesty's subjects were killed and wounded,"

POPAY, THE SPY.
Mr. COBBETT said, in rising to bring forward his
motion relative to the report of the committee on Younge's
petition against Popay the spy, it was not his intention
to say anything that might irritate or annoy his Majesty's
Ministers. The people ought, and he believed were satis-
fied with the conduct of his Majesty's Ministers, as far as
related to the inquiry upon that petition, at least as far
as the matter had already gone. But it ought not to stop at
the point of inquiry.-:--the Ministers were expected to do
something more. Every allegation in the petition had
been proved to the satisfaction of the Committee, and, as
the members of that Committee would declare, the wit-
nesses in support of the petition had behaved in the most
correct and proper manner. It must be in the recollec-
tion of the House, that Sir Charles Wolsley had been
'imprisoned and fined for using words much less sedi-
tious than those used by Popay, and certainty with
no ouch base and despicable intention; and yet this
Popsy—this criminal—was walking about. the streets
apparently without the slightest fear of punishment.
The people would naturally ask whether this was proper
or just; and if this man ought not to be prosecuted for
sedition :—if not, justice would not be done, and the
Solicitor- General would not be doing his duty.—
(Hear, hear.) if he were not prosecuted, the
people would say that the Government was anxious
to screen these wretches, or was afraid to proceed against
them lest they should reveal something which might affect
the Government. The crime could be proved—the wit-
nesses were ready—and why not have the criminal
brought before the Jury ? Before the Committee he
had mole such a shuffling defence, that every
Member was convinced of his guilt.—(Hear, hear.)
If, then, this man should escape, what would be the
opini.n of the people? This was all he should say on
that subject, hut leave his Majesty's Ministers to do wh at,
after such statements, they might think was right. But
Popay was not the only man who should be punished.
The superintendent, Maclean, had been guilty of the
greatest prevarication before the Committee. Az
first he denied having paid the spy any money
hut was afterwards obliged to confess that he
had paid lint money. His evidence was all a shuffle
from beginning to end. This was the superintendent
who dismissed the cowkeeper so cavalierly when the
latter complained that a police sergeant bad feloniously
stolen his milk. A pretty sample this was, of what
might be expected from these worthies forming it rural
police; why, they might as well send down as
many milk maids into the country, for there would not
he a cow left unmilketi by these precious rural guardians.
(Hear, and a laugh.) It was all too much of a piece in
these police matters, for Popay was unpunished, and
M'Lean, and the felon who stole the milk, still retained
their situations. He had seen the inatket gardener who
saw the police sergeant steal the milk, and had seen the
cowkeeper, and would pledge himself to prove the facts.
All he wanted was to state these facts to his Majesty's
Ministers, it) the hope of their taking some steps in the
matter before the commencement of the next Session He
could not, however, sit down without mentioning the
case of Mr. William Dean. In doing this he must say
that the Commissioners had not conducted themselve
before the committee in the manner that was expected.
It was they who brought up the name of Mr. Dean
in the committee ; for Mr. Dean had nothing to
do with the committee. The commissioners introduced
his name by saying that they had dismissed him, after
two years service, for some observations he had made re-
lative to the Calthorpe-street affair. Mr. Dean might have
acted indiscreetly in what he had said with reference to
Lord Melbourne, and to the proceedings of the Jury ;
but however this was, the commissioners acknowledged
that they had dismissed him from the Police,
into which he entered with a most excellent
character, and after he had satisfactorily fulfilled the du-
ties of sergeant—they confessed that they had dismissed
that man without putting him upon his defence, or con-
fronting him with his accusers. This he (Mr. CoViett)
considered to be a grievous wrong, and a showing of in-
defensible partiality, for if Bartlett, who stole the milk,
was kept in the police, surely this respectable man ought
not to have been dismissed for a hasty, inconsiderate, or
indiscreet expression. He should leave the criminals he
had mentioned in the hands of the Solicitor-Ge-
neral and only call on the House to aid him in
an inquiry into the affair of William Dean. The Hon.
Member concluded by moving for a copy of the order dis-
missing William Dean from the police.
Colonel EVANS, althoueh he had great objections to
the system of eolice, felt it his duty to bear testimony to the
unimpeachable characters of both the Commissioners,
especially Colonel Rowan, with whom he was personally
acquainted. As to the case of the spy which had been
adverted to by the Hon. Member for Oldham, a clearer
case, he thought had never been made out, and he
could not believe that the superintendent was igno-
rant of the man's procceedings. He concurred en-
tirely in the object of the motion of the Hon. Member
for Oldham, that Government would take into considera-
tion the propriety of visiting this man's eonduct with
something further than dismissal. With respect to Mac-
lean, he must say that he did not consider him fit to hold
the situation he did in a free country. He understood
that he was in the habit of employing sometimes as many
as twenty persons: in plain clothes ; such conduct could
not be too strongly deprecated, and he must say that it
tended greatly to increase the prejudices be had to
the system. The expense, too, was much greater, the
whole expense of the watch, in time districts where the
police were now s•ationed cost 137,0001., the police force,
however, during the last year, had cost no less than
215,000/. There was no doubt great objection to the
old system, but in his opinion it only required modi-
fication. Such a course hart beet' adopted in the City
of London, and had been productive of time best effect.—
(Hear, hear.) There were also very just complaints
with respect to the vigilance of the police; robberies were
continually being committed, the perpetrators of which
could not be discovered, and the servant of a friend of his
was time other night robbed near St. Martin's church,
when no policeman was to be found. It would be well
worthy the consideration of Government whether a modi-
fication could not take place in the lei ce, such, for instance,
as giving some control to the local authorities.

Mr. LAMB said, that with regard to the case alluded
to by the Hon. Member for Wham, he certainly was
of opinion that it was one calling for the interference
of the Secretary of State. The proof of Popay being a
spy was certainly very complete, with the exception of
that part of it which related to the assassination, but
he had been advised that he could not prosecute him
in Court, unless be relied on the odium that generally
attended spies—for that reason he did not think it his.
duty to prosecute him, but he wished it to be clearly
uuderstood,that he was dismissed from the Force altogether.
He had certainly seen Luab, and he would make it his
business to see him again, that he might make still more
particular inquiry. Upon the whole, be did not think
there was sufficient evidence, without further inquiry, to
call for the immediate discharge of the superintendent.
With regard to Mr. Wm. Dean, whose gravamen of
offence vas that of having expressed very strung opinions
respecting the Calthorpe meeting where he was not pre-
present, when he was examined his language was so
violent as to induce a belief that his mind was affected.
As to what had been said by the Gallant Officer
about policemen being employed in plain clothes, it cer
tainly did appear that twenty of them hail been so em-
ployed at different times for the purpose of detecting
felonies, but the twenty had never been employed all a
one time. It was to be recollected that before this force
was formed at all, all the officers that were employed
were nothing more nor less than policemen in plain
clothes. It had been very much considered by Sir
Robert Peel, whether they ought to wear uniform or
not, and upon the whole it was considered better that they
should wear uniform. Although this, however, had been
decided upon, yet it would be impossible to leave off wear-
ing plain clothes altogether. 01 course attention was to
be paid to the expense of the police : the accounts were
regularly laid on the table, and it was to be hoped the
rates in future would not press so heavily as to be the
souree of that which he believed to be the only, cause of
prejudice that had existed against the police.
Mr. WARBURTON thought the Hon. Member for