The Sun.
London, England, 1805-07-30 00:00:00

GA Al LAGER.

Mr, Resateey, for the Dean and Chapter, ap
plied to have Mr. Grainger, who had agreed tie. Leases
of certain houses belonging to the Dean and Chap-
ter of -Westminster, restrained for uplifting the,
rents of these houses, while, at the same time, he-
refused to complete the 'Leases and pay the fines
and expences stipulated for them. The Learned
Counsel submitted, that it might answer the pur-
pose, to order Mr. Grainger to pay the money into
Court, and to refer to the Master 4he terms in
which the Leases should be drawn. The Adver-
tisements in consequence of which Mr. Grains-er
offered for the Leases, bore them to be Dean and
Chapter Lands, to be let fir 40 year-t, renewable,
at the pleasure of the Dean and Chapter, as was
usual to be done, at the end of every 14 years.
Mr. RICHARDS, for the Defendant, said, it was not
on account of the price, which the Defendant had
lying idle at his Banker's, that the Leases had
nut been concluded ; but, from 'a refusal on the
part of the Dean and. Chapter to insert -what the
'Defendant understood. to have been in the contem-
plation of the parties at the time, namely, h Clause
making. the Leases renewable on the usual fines for
ever. The Defendant had 'no obje6tion to ppy the
money into Court, and to go before the Master to
have the terms of the Leases adjusted.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said, they Might go be-
fore the Master, but the Master would know his
duty too well to allow the insertion of any Clause
which could be of no 'use, as he must know a Clause,
stipulating for the -renewals for ever of Dean and
Chapter Lands to be void.

• ttlesiPsetkr dam FORMAN V. nin.m.
The Plaintiffs and Defendant were in partnership,'
and were proprietors of the,Red,Bull Wharf, and
also of a certain Iron-Mill in the.neighbourhood of
London. The Defendant bad taken'possession of the
&mks and of tine Premises of the Concern, for
.his
own exclusive belle& ; and the motive,of this appli.•
cation to the Court was,,that a .Receiver might be put
upon the Estate, and that the Defendant might be
dispossessed. • •
.Mr.-Prooorr, for the Plaintiffs, said, that they had
called upon the Defendant to &hew how 7,500 i, which
was to be his share of the Capital,.
had been paid,
And that be had refused to give
any ac court .of the
sante, or even to surrender the Rooks. Messrs. Cal-
vert and Co. had bOught the Premises, and had of..
fered to pay the Purchase-Money, being'!),3ool. into
the hands of any person the Plaintiffs and Defendant
should nominate, but the money was withhold, be-
cause the Defendant required it to be paid into his
own hands, and would appoint net common trustee.
The bill prayed that the . Partnership might be de-
clared to be dissolved in.. June last, and, besides. the
nominationof it Het:elver, sought' an Injunftion .to
restrain the Defendant from proceedings. under the
Partnership Credit, and with the Partnership Etreas,
Mr. MARTIN,.for the Defendant, otfered, that the
Partnership Firm should not he employed, and that
'access to the Books shoula be granted to the Plain-
'tiffs if time to answer were allowed.
The Lori CHANcELI.oIt.—" I am ready to give
the Defendant time, it he will make me quite stirs, no mischief shall he done in the interval. it is
bard to put a Receiver upon the Y.4tate...l do not Mean,
that the Court will not do it in awtain cases, bat it
dislikes so to a& until both the parties have been
heard. Let thingiremain in their present state, and
this motion may come on on Thursday morning."