The Sun.
London, England, 1834-11-08 00:00:00

COURT OF CHANCERY.—(THIS k)
1, 111"
The LORD CHANCELLOR was occupied the wu°'e -I
m
g with the further arguments in the appeal of t°
Cr°Ptht
v. the Derby Gas Light Company, which related
infringement of a patent for an improved gas meter'
n AY.
VICE-CHANCERY COURT.—(THIS )

Mr.
TICKNER V. HINDMARSII.—THE TRUE S"' the
HEATHFIELD applied for and obtained from oj
nn'.
Court a reference to the Master to inquire what sil°,so,
interest the late Mr. Hindmarsh had in the 'Rue
erS'
Weekly True Sun, and Morning News, lICWSPaP
WAIT V. GEORGE.--A WARD: . , °°
Sir EDWARD SUGDEN upon tis petition. nei‘ags,laiiii,tll.3:'
(the facts of which we gave a few days since) If' iti
liss 1"
the guardians had shown every anxiety to meet .. 0.
, but she seemed desirous to have her ew:eti
One of the guardians, a most respectable gentleman, °.i °g
to Thorn, residing in a lidility retreat near Bristol, Os sderate
take the young lady into his family at the Ine oir
re p oi
charge of 1001. a year. The young lady, bower
had
to live with him, or any of her other guardians,ll,Bo
had expressed her desire to be placed where she eouluol'ar.
fiee access to her father. Now, on the part of the qi,eir
dians, he was bound to say that it was not intended ent the
part to put her under any improper restraint, 1 they
guardians could not give up to the father the cove iir
had over her. What, therefore, in their behalf, ben `c,73313i1i
strutted to ask from the Court was, that the )1414.°h010
should be placed with one of her guardians (all °I ;oper
were most respectable men) until Christmas, s°9.e Ince.
place in the mean time being fixed upon for her resale, to
Mr. BELLASIS, on behalf of the young lady' st_te'in tl'e
.
she was no further desirous of having her on n ''an 0,
selection of the place where she should reside, than
proper and consistent. 1., ishes tj
The VICE CHANCELLOR—BUt I suppoo she s' iiter.,
be the judge Of the quantum of that propriety.--41134 ' '
of Mr. BE.LLASIS said that the young lady was not abeosisiv)lle
remaining with her father, or any person over ss ;di APY
had any control ; all she wished was to be placed "i'ientil"
person except the guardians, none of them being en.,,'l, 10.(4'
terms with her father. She had no friends to re` here:
but she was anxious to. be placed in a situation "
could have free access to her father. t °
After some further discussion, it being intimate-40r
Court that the young lady was in attendance, his ' ~, P
desired that she should attend him in his private rliect.
he was anxious to ascertain
His Honour then her wishes upon
left the Court, attended by the, it 0
the scuoujoei
and parties on both sides, when, we understanu'of9r.
agreedii that the young lady should go to the b°use 85; i°
the meantime,
at Bristol, one of the trustees, until ChristoloolLl
h eantime, some proper place for her residenee_e,K
befixed upon, not in the house of either of the trasie 51,00
father (P. Wait) being at liberty to visit and e°rre
- -

with her upon suitable occasions.
of
NEW KINGS' COUNSEL. apotlefllejes,
It was stated very confidently among the viiriders
the Bar this morning, that Mr. Preston, gr._...e I;il4'
Mr. Temple, and Mr. Jacob were to be 109-

Counsel. -
Alf.)
COURT OF KING'S BENCH.—{THIS
no, 110
DOE, ON THE DEMISE OF HENSLEY, V. 61°
OTHERS.
Mr. KELLY moved in this case, which bad beer' trbi the
Norwich before Mr. Justice GAZCELEE, and ill 'fbisee
plaintiffi had been nonsuited, for a rule to show cause
t the nonsuit should not be set aside, and a verdict ostrdr
for the plaintiff. The question turnedl uon the c°ll
tion of a will ; and after som,estr
Jury
asP to wiliheepl the
giv
the yenonsuited
the verdict should be entered
tiff, with leave from the Learned Judgeu to 010v,8050f, fo II:
present. rule. The question was, whether the r'clogyit
will gave to a person named Frances Blyford, "if,„ of
she took an estate for life, then o the llehootbe
",
her life, the claim of the remainder-man' u (frofa
plaintiff held) attached. If she took an estate in, le ti°
inasmuch as a recovery had been suffered, the es's„sel
remainder-man was barred. The Learned efliOri°s4
ceedcd to read extracts from the will of the tesw
port of his motion. ssible
t°,l
Mr. Justice TAUNTON said it would be inWei
derstand the scope of Counsel's argument un!ssbetbetb°
words in which the limitations were set forth
3
Court, as a single word would alter its
before ineanin,Tie Lei
e
The COURT took time to consult with
Judge whom the case was tried.
TICKELL V. BROWN. irOIC, per
Mr. Sergeant COLERIDGE moved in thief'l,or.
an action for an assault, tried at Exeter, ore cl,Tat
man, and in which a verdict of forty shillin' oitj,,
was, had for the plaintiff, for a new trial, on the giroiellth
I- is Lordship bad. rejected
some _evideacAdeac,, that
Counsel proceeded to state the value of the e pro" Ai
had.been rejected, and which would have elie!f I'l° shsl)
the plaintiff was a trespasser, and that the 'ereee'sign'e',,,l
justified in using a certain degree of fore inje.Lord
as such. This evidence had been rejected beeO' spec-
man on the ground that it shouldrej have
pleaded in the declaration.—Rule granted.
HOWE V. KENNETH AND 0°11• t° vs'
Mr. Sergeant COLERIDGE moved for 3 tc, this c-,01
cause why the verdict had for the defendaats l'ji
should not be set aside and a new trial bad 0' 'l:airist,ce,
of misdirection, or if not that the verdict Os ania b bad
Bence. It was an action for use and occuPati°,ll, -boas3
tried before Lord Denman, at Winchester• beelei
been let by the plaintiff to a Mr. Hawkins, svh°Z; preen
ia,n insolvent, and the property left by biro en ‘" este;oiLl
.ad been taken possession of by the defendants bath bee 0°
the creditors. The half-year'srentaccroing ijitioe'
to Howe, but he claimed twelve months' rent
,iai"j ha c'
the ground that they were yearly tenants -.lg coo' pre
given the usual notice. For the defence, it:wa- f the
that the defendants never had legal possess.°
the
d`
raises, and were not, betber
therefore, liable. t,
His LORDSHIP left it to the Jury to saY dersta cot,
fendants had occupied the premises with the ti:ecorne y 050ear'
sell
that they were merely to off the stock ef the
'
or with the understanding that they were I, f 11'6
tenants.
After hearing the arguments of counsel in suPr°rt
motion—

The CotraT granted a rule Ni. 4.
founda.ai
against
defendant guiltys
After ,
the false • l • as - 10',
meati. , and
plottingfra u d ; he
toe wasoverthrow
__yeo The trial of the false Dauphin in Paris n rille, vi
fl six days' duration, been brought to a close. ethieli'oe
King
dhim, except those of plotting against the_squipts.
coonfde themthn
eepdri
to
ocipal
tious libels.—French IP'
Paper. opej
The last time the v •
we met Ca tain IVlaonire ‘ es , 0
man recently murdered near P ' ber we- ovd
Cabir), we remem tage or f.,/
our admiration
at his courage in living in a cot •.. -(1
such a district. He told h h had nothing, ' A tr.
us t at e , ,algnincr'
that the peas ' antry of Tiperary were too mu l: n , oa lot
that man who just in his • l
was j his dealings and kind in pty .fig
might reside with all his - •h a '14.9401
doors open, and wit .1,
he would not 7), bh,
Pest. be robbed of a cabbage plant.---- .` •
sio?
,icet ~ 0
Government, twelve i ya ga
: and
i ffeorOl::
THE NEW COTTON C The Pa' l'or'cel
Columbus, Captain Cobb, ' CROP:
from brings oci ~
which arrived Lriogi ,00 P
Liverpool. on Thursday, e con oti
y, the 6th of November, f 0
to the
19th ult., which estimate the new eroP: °a 0
1,200,000 bales, and confirm the reeole
previously
relative 61:
to the anticipated lateness of the crop.
LIVERPOOL NOv', giro;
CoTTON-INIARKET, Abe,
We have experienced on to Abe
We a very fair inquiry for cott boe obi
both the trade and sculators. About 5,000 bales a spec
fold, at the extreme prices ofone-half 0
yesterday,
tion • • in 05
. , principally American, from Sid. to lod. v
41
.... 11 .°
WRECK OF AN EASTERN PAcKEJ.,,_, b 9.•i1,..i.
LOST.—The schooner Boundary, Shackford, iwe off I ced
this morning from Eastport, 7th instant, rep
and reced,
Quoddy-head, spoke a St. Andrews pilot-boat, an „. Prof
the melancholy intelligence that the packets chooll': After,
Pierce, hence for Eastport, was lost the 2d instant, ore'rses,ect,
Seal Islands, during a gale and thick fog, and 1740 ''''sotl
rished ; among them Captain Pierce and son, Jvcood Lobs
the mate, the cook, and 13 passengers' Joseph
0,1,a0114
Ebenezer Starbard, of Eastport ; William Fowlern..itvicic,;i,
and Samuel Wiggin, jun., of St John's, New 13r11Zir. Gip
all the names Captain Shackford could ascertain.e_,:'whNieh
ing, a passenger, and five of the crew were say ° ,00,eet
the body of Mr. Fowler, were on board the pilot-lw bar
0,4
arab ' 0,4
was bound into Lubec. The wreck of the Si_ 0 i
00,
drifting about six miles from the Sea Islands, It tne,t 0554 i
with all her spars and rigging hanging alongside. i...VP
posed she was lying to, ancr went ashore stern on.
Books—Boston. 1 eSOI
wo- of
A tremendous collision took place °n eir-0 trfeil'
evening, about five o'clock, off Greenwich, bet the
the IVt
sport ship, which was going which was
River, and with Foe
way, a Gravesend steamer, which was coming nPee of log'
passengers on board. It appears that in consell..o ,terrer
misunderstanding as to the course each vessel..."the go. oe
the ship ran foul of the steamer striking ber 1", el 01_.,,t
and carrying a • the stern,'breaking the "7"e too',4e
nay The ;
tiller, and oing other considerable damag lives, .4p
at the helm had a very narrow escape of their.e _towel. c„,
concussion was so great that every timber of th
were
broftbe
shaken, and a great number of plates and dishear...a. bill 03
The passengers were in a state of great4ubs '''.l„),ar.ft A
steamer proceed_;,,;, -after some Shealy to rr ler repair' taill
there 1.2.;,dcd her passengers. nov.unu ,rhe capttot
ration of the stern wasp icked up yesteric.laY.i spiel the
of the steamer, who is blamed by the othe side, board br'l
rscole 01, that e
great neglect was exhibited by the p---.. l ineo . -00
• • of nautica .
_ye 6
transport ship. It is the opinion Would IP
the steamer been struck in the midships sbe
down.