The Sun.
London, England, 1834-11-25 00:00:00

COURT OF KING'S BENCH-(THIS DAY).

Stn JonN Nicnor.L took the oaths as Vicar-General of the
Archbishop of Canterbury, and Sir HERBERT JENNER was sworn
in one of His Majesty's Most Hon. Privy Council, Dean of the
Arches, and a Judge of the Prerogative Court.

TIBBETTS V. YORE.

The COURT gave judgment in this case. It was an action brought
by the Clerk of a Navigation Company against one of the proprietors
for work and labour done.

The Couar thought both parties were in some degree in fault,
but they were of opinion that the verdict should be entered for the
plaintiff on the common count only, entitling him to single costs—
that the Master should review his taxation, and that the plaintiff
should refuse to the defendant the difference between the double and
single costs.

ICILLADAM V. THE INHABITANTS. OF THE CITY OF BRISTOL.

The Co URT gave judgment inthi;e;;;,. whichwas—an
action brought by the executrix of the tenant of certain premises
held under lease from the Corporation of the City of Bristol, and
which were destroyed by fire during the riots that took place there
in the year 1831. The first question raised was whether the exe-
cutrix of the tennor for years could maintain an action under the
7th and Bth Geo. 4, chap 31., for injury done to the premises ; and
the second question was whether if the action was commenced and
abated, a fresh action could be brought by the executrix of the
tennor, more than three calendar months having elapsed. The
Court being of opinion that the defendants were entitled to judg-
ment on the second thought it unnecessary to consider the first.-
-Judgment for the defendants.

MORGAN AND ANOTHER V. CRESWELL.
Mr. MARTIN moved for a rule t > show cause why the nonsuit
should not be set aside and a verdict entered for the plaintiff, or a
new trial had. It was an action on a bill of exchange for the sum
of 1501, tried yesterday at the Guildhall, before Mr. Justice Lit-
ledale. Evidence of the payment of the bill bad been given by the

banker's clerk, but the Learned Judge thought that there was not
staficient evidence of the payment of the money to the ilefencrant,
and nonsuited the plaintiff for want of proof of consideration.—
Rule granted.

BAIL COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

IX-TASTE BRYANT.

-The AIVORNXV-GENERAL applied for & writ of eertionzri to
bring into that Court from the Middlesex Sessions, an indictment
against Messrs. Charles and Andrew Bryant, sons to Mr. Bryant, a
solicitor of that Court, for a conspiracy to defraud the prosecutor
of certain goods and chattels therein set forth. The counsel stated
that his application was made upon the affidavit of Mr. A ndreW Bryant.
setting forth that the result of this indictment was most important
to him, as affecting his character, and the success of an under-
taking in which he had embarked a considerable portion of his pro-
perty—the publication of county maps. The present application
had come before the Court on a former occasion, but the affidavits
having been insufficient, it had been refused.—Rule granted.

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

(Before the COMMON SERJEANT.)
Wm. Beckett, aged 20, was indicted for stealing a coat, the
property of Herbert Robinson, a hat belonging to James Hants,
and one the property of Daniel Bligh, from the litiuse of Mrs.
Styles, Gower-street, Bedford-row.
It appeared that about the end of last month there was
an evening party entertained, at the house of MrS. Styles.
At nine o'clock the prisoner knocked at the door, and when it was
opened presented a letter addressed to Mr. Styles, and said it re-
quired an immediate answer, for which he would wait. The servant
,took it and was proceeding up stairs to deliver it to her mistress
when she heard a noise in the passage. Her suspicionswere thereby
excited, and :he again came down, when she saw the prisoner tak-
ing the property named in the indictment from the passage, where
they had been hung up. She gave an alarm—the prisoner was pur-
sued, and the whole of the property found-upon him.
The several articles were identified by their owners.
The prisoner was found guilty, and the Learned Judge told him
that he must. go across the water.
There was no trial of any public importance before the Recorder
up to the time we went to press.