The Sun.
London, England, 1802-05-07 00:00:00

GENERAL POST OFFICE,

• 41,14), C,
„.„
baii4ng been take to• fac;-
... :itate the -Means
_of extending the Number of POST
DAYS to and from the CONTINENT of EUROPE, His
Majesty's Postmaster General hereby gives notice, that on .4,1
from MONDAY, the 17,, ingant, the MAILS fix' FRANCE,
HOLLAND; a'd HAAllit. RGH, will be made up three times
a Week, instead of twice, and be dispatched, from tense Ten
o'Clock in the Evenings of 5M0ND.414.53 IVIWNESDAYS, and
FRIDAYS, and that all Letters most he hairght to this Offi4f
before Nine'o'Clock on those nights.
By Comtizand of His Majesty's Postmzster-General,,
FRANCIS ,FREELINC.:, SeertYa4.,

RS. EMMERICH, Iliughter of the late• Mr..
Spateman, of Cannon-street, In the City (who was of
an ancient and respeCtable family), and the Wife of lieu-
tenant-Colonel Emmerich, who commanded a Corps of
British ChaSSeurs in America, in aid• of the late Sir
Henry Clinton, and was Deputy-Surveyor-General of HiS
Majesty's Woods and Parks, &c. &c. As at length under
-the necessity of 'exposing her situation, soliciting the at-
tention of-the Public to allOrd her relief.- Her being so
circumstanced. through a concatenation of events, arising
and occasioned through their late Father having been ever.;
thrown in consequence of Colonel F.nunerien's engaging or
the defence' of the Stadthoider, at the time of the revolt in
Holland, in the year 1789, unknown to their late Father,
who thotight. himself secure ha accopting Bills to a large
amount fora speculation of) Hock Wine; instead of which a
considerable part was appropriated to that purpose. ,
Her having accomeamcd Colonel Emmerich- to-Germaey,
and there resided eleven years, where, after experieneing,a
-variety cf scenes in the vicissitudes of fate (being at the seat
of War), became in a situation of great distress, and was cir-
cums,antially under the necessity of returning to Feesland,
when, finding it on the point of being invaded, she composed.
a representation of 'the different scenes and occurrences she
had been -spectator of during the time she resided where the
• I," renchefirst made their entrance in Germany, at Cologne.'
But through an accidental circumstance the Piece was lost,
end not recovered till after the Peace was announced, which
lapse of time broke the chords of the design, as it Was to re-
'• present what might be expected from the condua of the
Enemy, should they succeed id their effirt. . But notwith-
standing the production has lost the object in view, yet it
perhaps, still be deemed amusing (on which account
she intends publishing it), it being rho perspeCtive of the
great Theatre of A,ll:ton in a Dramatic Repe:sentation.
It is humbly hoped the situation and tile motive will be •:
the inducement to' the Benevolent to favour the Siihscription,
which is to enable her to establish a Seminary for the .e:du:
cation aye:Aire; Ladies, to support nersell and her Sisters, who
are deprived of their inheritance, and can have no redress;
as also forpse maintenance of COlonel Einmerich, who is
upwards of 73 years (Wage, and who, ..through repeatedly en-
gaging in pre,ieCts which have proved unsuccessful, added to
'other causes, remains abroad in the situation of being totally
without any means of supporting himself.
- Whoever, in consideration of the before-described situation,
should be disposed to favour the Subscription, the places
appointed for that purpose are, Wigley's Koy-al Promeneete
Room, Spring Gardens; Mr. Way, Tea-dealer, the 'corner
of Newport-street, 'St. Martin's-lane; Messrs. •Winter and
Hughes, Tea-dealers, NO. 51, Newgate-street.

ROMAN CEMENT.
MESSRS: PARKER and .Co. Bankside, ' South-
wark, minutadure Cement, or Mortar, for budding
in Water, which far surpasses in utility. Dutch TerraA, or
any other kind of Mortar : it gives to all kinds of Brick or
Stone Work, ari uncommon degree of strength and cohesion ;
it sets under- Water, soon becomes as hard irs Stone, pay
be exposed even to the action of the Sea, without injury. ka
all Buildings, therefore, intended to resist, or contain Viat*r, -
this Cement may be used with singular advantage ;, or it inay
be lowered with Lime and Sand, to any desirable degree, for
common purposes.
They also prepare STUCCO for easing Buildings with, of
the" same hard and dyable nature as the Cement : it preserves
the walls from wet and danip, anTinay be executed so as ,
completely to resemble Stone, at a very moderate expence.
Flat Riming, Coping, and Gutter Stones, cheaper than Na—
tural Stone.

For•CIIILBLAINS, RIIE•LINIATISMS, BRUISES,
DR. STEERS's Oi'ODLLDOC.
THIS Medicine has been long acknowledged to
be "superior to every Preparation of the kind. in the
Cure of Bruises,. Sprains, Rheumatisins, Cramps,- Numb-
ness and Stillhess of the Joints, and other extern,si Coin--
plaints, as well as in restoring a proper Circulation- to the
Limbs when in a Paralytic state. It is alsb- particularly ser-
viceqble for Chilblains but in this complaint. it should be
dissolved, and applied warm. •
On the dittside-of each Bottle of the Genuine Opodeldbc
-is pasted•a Staillp, in which are engraved these words:—
" P. NEWBERY, No. 45, St. Paul's." All others
are counterfeit.

Sold only by F. Newhery, at the Warehouse for Dr.
James's Powder, • No. 45, in St. Paul's ChUreh-yard, a le.w
doors from the Corner of Cheapside ' London ; and, by his
appointment, by Messrs. jeboult and Co. No. 150, and T.
Pidding, No. 76, Oxford-street; I. Wade, Old Bond-street;
Bayley and Co. Cockspur-street; Godfrey and Cooke,
Southaripton-street; j. Ward, -Middle-row, Holborn.; T.
`Putt, Ruy:ll-Exchange ; and W. Clarke, Borough, -High-
street ; price as. 6d.- per Bottle, including the Stamp, or Six
for qs. 6d. -
N. B. As the Opodeldoe for-Exportation is exempted from
the Stamps, and therefore deprived of that mark of authen-
tititY and as great quantities of Counterfeits are sent out of
thejeingdom, all Persons Abroad, to prevent such Impo-
sitions, are desired to be particular in Ordering thiir Agents
to procure this Medicine trom Mr. Newbery's.

• • A WONDERFUL CURE.
By taking one Boyle of Drops only.
To Mr. Lignum, Stngeon, No. 57; Bridge-Street, MancEes-
ter.
Sir, Northwich, Cheshire, Jane", 1799.
THREE years have elapsed .since my Daughter'
(who is now eight years of age), received, I think f may
with confidence say, the most extraordinary cure that was
ever in public print. . Her complaint- was an inveterate le-
prosy and scurvy, with width she was afflitted for many
months in a most distressing manner ; her body, from head
to foot, face excepted, was sometimes covered 'with at ales,
of winch, in a morning, handfuls •might be taken from-her
bed ; at other times, with eruptions,. front which issued a
large quantity of ichorous humour, attended with insufrer,
able itching; the discharge was so great, that she was con-
stantly wrapped in finen cloths, covered with some undiotts
substance, to keep theta from adhering to the parts. • In this
miserable and hapless situation she' was languishing, when,
providentially, • I was recommended to make trial of your.
Antiscorbutic Drops. But how shall I express my gratitude
to God, and you, . for your excellent medicine for after
having taken only one 4s. 6d. bottle of the DropS, every
symptom of her loathsome disorder disappeared, and, thank
God, there has not been the least appearance of its return,
she having enjoyed an uninterrupted state of health for the
last three years. Any person may4be further satisfied by ap-
plying to Mr. Peter Maddock, of whom I purchased your
Drops ; or to, Sir,
Your humble Servant,
THOMAS•RIIODE.
These Drops are sold in moulded square bottles', at ILS.
and 4i. 61. ones. One 12S. bottle is equal in quantity to three
4s. bd ones. They may he had, wholesale and retail, at
Lignum's Dispensary, No. -p, Bridge-street, Manches-
ter ;at Howardts and Evans's,. No 42, Lang-lane, West-
Smithfield; sole Wholesale Agents in LOndon and retail oy
the following persons : H. Cundell, No. 47, ; W.
Clark, No. 269, Borough t Jordan, NeX 33, Whitechapcl ;
Jeboult, No. 10, Oxford-street ; Sutton, No. 141, Long—
acre ; Wade, Old Bond-street, and No. 163, fleet street ;
Tutt andßoulton, Royal Exchange ; Knight, Norton Fal.
gate; Turtle, NO. 127, Strand ; and Ward, - No. 324, Help
born.

- -
JMPbRItIL PAI? L'ArAll,l EN T.

1

HOUSE OF PEERS,

THURSDAY, MAY 6.

HOUSE OF COMMONS,

THpitspAy,. 04y 6.

Coe ts..ss.t. were filially heard relative to the Scotch Appeal,
hog, v. Thwaites, uarnely, the ATTORNEY ,GENERA,L on
the pan of the t\ ppellants in reply, aftec which their Lord-,
ships postponed the further hearing of the case till this day
se'nnight.
The various Bills before the House were. forwarded in their
respedive stages.
The Eledion Treating Bill was brought up from the Com-
mons by Lod BELO R VE, and one Private Bill was pre-
sented by i\;l,r. j9DDRE.LL.
• Some private btisiness was then -disposed of, and their
Lordships adjourned until -to-morrow, when, the House
.ttanci.s s:turimoned,upon- the Motion of EarlSf ENC.Eri.

On the question, Whether the Cullan Road Bill should be
read a'secoh:l time, it was opposed by Sir rr_ Li Am SCOTT,
and supported by Mr. Mf.reivr.F • Upon which the House
:divided, ayes 53, noes 49. The Bill was then read a second
time.• On the question that this Bill becommitted, the House
again divided, ayes 51, noes 40.
, Earl TEMPLE rose, in consequence of a former 1
notice, to move for certain Papers relative to Malta.
In the first plice, however; he said, lie should state
. the reasons which induced him to call for these
Papers. It was agreed in the Preliminary Treaty,
that Malta should be restored to the Order,as it was
before the war, placed under the guarantee of a
third Power. By the Definitive Treaty both these;
stipulitions- were. infringed; the order is not re-
stored to its situation before the war ; a,new Lan-
guage has been introduced into the Order, incon-
sistent with the radical principles of Nobility on
which the Order is' founded.; by leaving out the
French Languages, and introducing that of Malta,
- we have adopted the much deprecated principle of
interfering with theThternal Government of Foreign
Nations ; we have joined, France in revolutionizing
:Malta, and converting the Order of Nobility into
a Deniocracy. The NOble 1.,0rd then entered into a
detail of the revenues of Malta, in order' to prove
that we had restored the Order without provid-
ing for their support, and consequently for their
independence. He then- proceeded to shew that a
Neapolitan
,Garrison put Malta entirely into' the
hands of France ; he. ontended that Prussia, Austr la,
and Russia, would, not interfere with the guarantee
proposed to l them, and then the affair "remained
entirely between Great Britain and France. He
coneluded by several observations, to shew how•
much the security Of Malta is aiFeled by .the state
Tw Inch the Cisalpine .Republie was , placed by the
reaty of Luneville ; from which he inferred the
recessity of that Treaty being laid before the House.
He concluded by moving, , :

" That there be laicr before the House statetrent of the
romthercial Duties and Territorial Revenues of 'the. Island
of Malta since it was surrendered 'to His Majesty's forces,
yith these Duties and Revenues, distinguished into any
nual accounts." • • • •-• • • •

The cotton was then.put_and agreed to.
Earl TEMPLE then moved,
" That an humble. Address be presented to His ,Majesty,
will be graciously pleased to lay' before the House a
ropy of that Treaty concluded Luneville, between the
Etripact of C.,ertriany and the French Republic."
Lord .11,1WEESia-747Y said, he did-not rise to
arty LnsWer whatever in this course of the
proceedings, which tic thought .would not be right"
or regular, but simply to state in a feW words' why
-he should obed, to this gotion... The flat Motion
of the Noble Lord was .for a Mere matter of Ac-
count. to be laid befOre the House, and he had offer-
ed no objection to it, nor had'he any; but this vas
Of another kind, and he objeded to. 1:, because no
Parliamentary ground either had been, or could be
stated for the produaion ,of the' 'Treaty which i 1
called for. Yesterday- Motions had been made;and
one of them for the Treaty of Badajos, to which
be did not objeel, because a fair Partiamentary
ground 'was laid for its produCtiOn, and so, he
did not Oppose it, nor did he, after the Mo.;

tion wab modified, oppose that for the produc,
tion of the Tri:aty of Madrid. The Treaty o

Was concluded a year acro to which
this country was no pzrty, and was not includ_
ed in the Definitive Treaty of Peace—under these
circumstances., he .aid not think any Parliathentary
ground wv:s laid for this Motion. This Treaty
could not be wanted for inforination, because, in
reality, they might haye a Copy of it at almost
every Booksetiee.s:Shop ist this Town. But there,

was no ground for calling for it as .a State Docu-
ment ; Gentletnen had no right to say, that this
Treaty was in the hands of Ministers. He did not

say it was not but he did say, that -tli-ere was no
Ic'arliamentary ground laid for' the House tb say it
Wai. Feeling that this application to the 'House
was different from that to which the House assented
yesterday, that tlio l'arli,imentary ground was laid
for calling for it, that it had no cOnnealion with 'the

Treaty Of Peace, nor with any thing arising out of
it, he took the liberty of resisting this Morton.
Mr. THOMAS GRENFILLE said, he could
tot alldw the.distintlion made by the 'Noble Lord,
between the'Treaties of Madrid and Luneville, nei-
ther of which were mentioned -in the Definjtive
Treaty, but both were intimately conneaed with
it, The ecssion of the' Cisalpine Republic was so
generally understood to increase the power of France
in that quarter,.that most people thought we should
IPiave retained I\l4lta, us a countervailing possession.
t could not then be argued, that the Treaty of
Which. the Cisalpine Repubil was
,given up to France, was a question uncooetaed
With a discussion reliaing Malta,

Mr. PITT said, that his Noble Friend had not
stated that the Treaty in question had, or had not
I:ezn o icially communicated to Governmentr, he
ilitrely stated, that. the Noble Lord and the Gentle-

iticn Who supported this Motion, had no Parliamen-
tary ground upon which they could assert that this
Tleaty 1-14 d been so officially' communicated, But
tie' ;Pally could not conceive how the.produetion of
';his Treaty could'be necessary for the purpose of
Thc;c:ebate, nor did lie think it could be properly
applied fof, on the grounds which had been. stated ;
ti.s Right. Hon. Friendspust know, that the Treaty
Luneville was not made in conjtinOi4o this
ihat we were not a party ni.,,zeisarily eon-
44ed with it. • Whether we approved of the Go-
,Ttrnent of Aust.ii3 yidding to the necessity which
.• ' •

d; aced that Treaty, Wag another question, but
it certainly was not a British question. But on
what &untis did the produdion of this Treaty
appear to
.be necessary to a free, comprehen-
sive, and candid discussion df the Treaty of
PeaCe, such as tet?cled to convey substantial in-
formation to enable the House to forma judg-
ment sa.tisfaaary to themselves, and the 'Pub-
lic The mode of Airoceeding adopted by his
.Right Hon. Friends Alper) this occasion, seemed to be
to separate, and to take one by one, the different 4r-
ticks of this Treaty ; and by these Motions, to
diicuss each Stipulation. by itself, instead of inves-
tigating the whole'-Treaty at once, and deciding
upon its general merits. His Right Htm.'Friends
confessed, that the subjea was not before the
House; they called for Documents to, enable them
to decide ; and yet they argued with as much pe-
remptoriness and decision? as if, not only no further
information was necessary, bur as if the question
admitted of no doubt. They decided without he.
sitation or difficulty, that one Stipulation was inef-
feAual—that another was inconsistent with the in_
terest of the ,Country--that a third was disgrace-
ful, &c. He agreed with his Right Hon. Friends,
that th4'stibjed was .to be considered With a re_
ference to the general situation of Europe granted
btit if the Treaty of Luneville was laid before the
Houie, what use would it he Of at present ? His Right
Hon. Friend opposite to him (Mr. GaErivi Lee) had
lamented some of the Stipulations of that -Treaty—
so did he. It was, however, now set aside by are a&
of the FienchGUyernment, which 'was a newrnqnu-
'tient of the ambition of that Country, ereaed even
between the Preliminary and Definitive Treaty ;
his Right
.4 1 . on. Friends opposite-to and he did
not differ in their opinions of the Chief Consul and
Government of France. 4s far as that conduct went,
it might be urged as an objeaion to the whole
Treaty.. "He did not differ
.from them upon general
points, but with regard to the inference that Might
be drawn frOgi them. , The way to consider this sub-
je& would be, in hiS opinion, when the time for dis-
cussion came; to consider the objets gained 'and for.:
tified by the Treaty of Peace, compared with the pro-
bable effeel of a continued prosecution of the War, un-
d# the circumstances in which Europe was placed,
when all the Other Powers were making separate
'Treaties of Peace, .and securing their separate in-
feresti: 'He. had said perhaps. more than was ne-
cessary ; but he merely' said thiS to suety the view
in which, he considered the question. There was
nothing more unfair,. in his opinion, than thus tak-
ing the Treaty article by article, 'and debating it
in detail, when the only proper way to consider
such a subjea was to take it in the whole, with all
its bearings and obje'ts ; to consider the situation
of,Europe, and the hopes, .by continuing the war,
of altering its situation, and to compare them with
the difficulties of continuing the War. His opinion
of the situation and resources of, the Country were
well known ; it was such as ought, not to compro-
mise the safety or dignity of the Country. He ;le-
ver thought so, and he was now less than ever in-
duced to hold that opinion ; we were far from hay.
ing arrived at the ultimate• period of our resources.
This was a general question, and he really thought
that his Right Hon. Friends would do better to vOait
for the period of general discussion, 'than to adopt
this plan, which, strialy speaking', was not irre-
,gular or unparliamentary, of discussing the Treaty
in detail, and staking every Motion for a paper a
vechicle for general animadversions uponthe Peace.
-This kind of debating could answer no good pur-
pose, and therefore 'he 'was not surprized that the
Ministers declined. this mode of discussing the sub-
jea, and waited for the day appointed for taking
the Treaty into consideration.
. Mr. IV.I.2VDHAIV contended, that we could not
argue so well upon the. Treaty of Luneville, nor
make such use of , it in the Debate, if it were not
officially laid upon the Table. The ,Treaty of
Ltineville throws much light 'upon the general
Question, by chewing in what state Europe was
placed by it. It also brought to light the bad faith
of the Power with which we had recently treated.
The utility of having the Treaty of Luneville
was then evident ; the only question that remained
was, whether an authenticated or an unauthenticated
Copy-of it was preferable. It was proper to have
information ; and it was necessary to shew for what
reason any particular inforination was called for.

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said,
he would not pretend to decide upon the intention
pf Gentlemen, in
,the Motions that had been. made
upOn this Subject ; he could only judge Of the ten_
dency of them.—His Hon. Friend had said, he did
not ask for the judgment of the House at present
on any part•of this Subject; that, Mr. ADD I I,ITON
said, was what he complained of, for when the
judgment of the 'House could not be had upon the
Subject, Gentlemen were taking a course (as far as
their influence could go) to_atfea that judgment
beforehand ;—a mode of proceeding which was
certainly at variance with the practice of the House.
—lf the language of the Hon. Gentlemen on the
-other side of the House, was; as had been described
by his Right Hon. Friend (Mr. PITT) ; if their Ar-
guments had. been direded • to obtain information
merely ; from him, and he believed from no other
quarter, would they hear any complaint whatever :
but the complaint was, that these Hon. Members
were taking a course, the tendency of which was,
to produce opinions which could not be expressed
by the House.—Now, with reference to the Mo-
tion before the House,• he had very little to add to
that which was said by his Right Hon. Friend on
the Bench behind him (Mr. PITY), and his Noble
Fried on the Bench with him.—But it was said, it
waT right for the House to know what had, been
done with regard the Cisalpine Republic, and
that therefore the Treaty of Luneville should be
produced ; the answer to which was, that the
Treaty of Luneville could not explain that Sub_
jest ; it could give no information whatever upon
the Subject on which so much stress was laid by
Hon. Members on the other .side of the House.—
It had been alledged; that the Treaty of Taineville
would be useful to. the House in the disCuSsion of
the. Treaty of Peace, and• it had been -Oki also
that his Noble Friend admitted the Treaty of
Luneville was an Official Document. 'His Noble
Friend had said' no such thing-.—He did not
acknowledge it to be an Oficial Document ;--1-le

said, he did rot mean to eay whether it was or not
an Official Document, but that it had never been
stated in such a way as justified the House in con.
sidering it as an. Official Document.--But, it was
said, thr,t as the Treaty of 4adajos )4 been
granted, the Treaty of Luneville ought to be grant-
ed.also—and, it was Wic.ed, how could the one be
• refused since the other was granted? The answer to
which was? That the one had no necessary con-
, net-lion with the Treaty of Peace, and the other
had. The justification of a particular part of •the
Cohdu4 of the g.itecutive government rested on an
Article of the Treaty of Badajos ; and it was there-
' fore assented to, that such Treaty should be laid
before the' House; but that was not the case with
resped to the Treaty of 4uneville :—However, if
it was conneaed with the Negotiation which cop-
eluded in a Treaty of Peace, and if, instead Of justi-
fying Ministers, it would lay down grOund'of in-
culpation, and the Document called for, was an
Official Document ; then it should, be produced.
The Treaty of Badajos had a necessary'conneion
with very important parts of the Negotiation.—
The Treaty of Luneville had no such donne Lion ;
and therefore he concurred with his Noble Friend
in resisting this Motion,„--rThere was no reason to
say that the discussion would be fettered, or that
the ground of argument. would be narrowed on the .
Sullied of the DefinitiVe Treaty of Peace, by .nega-
tiving this Motion.--However, if there had been a
Parliamentary ground laid for the produftion of the
-Treaty of Larneville,,unquestionably it ought to be
produced—but it was not -,so ; and he woLid fake
the liberty to add, 'that tl:re 'Treaty of LUneville
wool4.noi aid the disctision, if it were before the
House. In one word,. the grounds cf his opposition
to this Motion were—that no parliamentary 'found-
ation was laid for its produdion ; and also, that he
denied there was.any conneaion 'between the docu-
ment demanded, and the subja to be discussed.
WINDHAM explained, that it was not. Pis-
cussiOn but Inforthation that was at present re-
quired,'
Sir l YOUNG said, that it was only from the
Treaty of Luneville we' could learn if the connec-
tion between France and Austria was such, that the
latter would be a proper guarantee for Malta.
Mt. /ONES said, that the Ex-Chancellor of
'the Exchequer and he seldom had the fortune to
agree in . opinion ; but what that Right Hon.
Gentleman had said this night; was so like what he
himself had said last night, (a loud laugh) that they
seemed for once to agree in opinion. Long speeches,
he said, had been made about Papers. He did not
know what use would be made of them ;" but, cer-
tainly, the movers worked well with the materials
they had ; but .their efforts were in vain, for the
Public would hear of nothing but Peace.
Mr. ALEXANDER deprecated the present mode
cf discussion, as it tended to prevent all Parliamen-
tary business, and to prejudice the public mind be-
fore the question was fully and fairly discussed..
Dr. LAWRENCE contended, that it •WaS per-
fe&ly proper on moving for Papers, to go into the
discusSion of those points to which the Paper's re-
lated ; added to this, it was impossible to discuss a
subject of such magnitude as the Definitive Treaty,
where so many points were to he considered in otie

debate, nor could they go with propriety into that
discussion without the means of previously inquiring
into the details which relatol to the subjed. T 1
Treaty now asked for was one of two Documents,
the other being the treaty of Badajos, Which re-
lated to Malta, and he thought it .ought as well as
the latter to be laid before the House.
The Motion was negatiired.
On Lord TEMPLE'S last Motion being put,
for a Copy of the Laws and Constitution of the
Order of ;Malta, referred to in the toth and rob
Sedions of the loth Atti'ele of the Definitive

Treaty,
Lord HAWKESBURY obje&ed ,o it, observing,
that 'he believed His Majesty's Ministers were not
n possession ofany Official Document of this nature ;
it was matter of history, and any one might refer
to it. - • •

After a short conversation between Lord TEM-
PLE, Lord HAWKESBURY, Mr. WINpIiAM, Mr.
N. VANSITTART, and Dr. LAWRENCE, the Motion
was negatived.
The second reading of the Irish Court of Law Eiil was
postponed till Tuesday.
The farther consideration of the report of the Poor Relief
Bill w: deterred till Friday next.
- The Bill to amend the Lords Ad was re-Committed. A
short conversation took place between Mr. Wit. 4rAm
WYNNE, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. SERJEANT MOORE, and
Mr. BURTON, when the Bill passed through the Committee.
The report was received, and ordered to be taken into farther
consideration on Tuesday, and the Bill to be printed as amend.-
ed.

Mr. N. VANSITTART moved for leave to bring in a Bill to
enable officers, seamen, marines, and soldiers, employed in
the serVice of, the Country since the 24th 'George 111. to ex-
ercise Trades.—Leave given.
The second reading of the Town of Sligo till was post-
poned till Monday.

Mr. W. ELIOT gave notice of his intention to move the
Navy Services in the Committee of Supply on Monday.
Mr. BANK ES brought up the Report Of the Committee on
Dr. Jennet's Petition, which was ordered to lie on the Ta-
ble, and to be printed..

Mr. ALEXANDER brought up the Irish Sugar Drawback
Bill, which was read a first time, and ordered to be read a
second time to-morrow. .-

Mr. ALEXANDER' brought up the Irish Indemnity Bill,
which was read a -first time, and ordered to be read a second
time to-morro*.
• •
The Committee on the 7 Aas relative to the Sinking Fund
was postponed till Monday. • •
The Committee on the Irish Linen Bill was deferre.4..till
to-morrow.

The Committee on the Aas relative to the Provisional Ca-
valry was postponed. till' Wednesday. • .
The Militia Pay Bill passed through a Committee,• and
the- Report was ordered to be received-to-morrow.
The Militia Subalterns Bill passed through a Committee.,—
.Report. t6,:morrow. • ... .

l'heCuilimittee on the Scotch Nlilitia Bill was postponed
till to-rnorfow'.

Adjourned at eight o'clock till to-morrow.

PR ICA 0

S T

dank Stock 192 3
N.oey per cetit. ro3i- 2:k 3
; per C.erit. 't797,
par Cent. •
4 per Cent. Cote. glak
perCetit. Red. 75,1.•
kr Cent. Con. 7biai : .
Ditto Scrip ,1*
Bank 1... Ann: 217-161 7-16
Ditto Short Atilt:
Ditto Scrip