The Sun.
London, England, 1851-01-22 00:00:00

CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY•

70 p
96.;

56 p

102
35/A

-
784

112
961
17%
11%
38%

Y•)

EXCHEQUER.—(THIS DA - t„,dtif,
The Court proceeded with the Special Parr p*,:til pr
but the cases argued involved nu question of go-
public interest.

SECONDARIES'.—(THIS DA"
(Before Mr. Secondary POTTER.)
WILSON IP. WOLFF.
This was an action to recover the sum of 1°" l fOr
house'
the use and occupation of apartments in plaintiff's
in Scarborough-street, Goodman's-fields. A bliC
Defendant pleaded that he was not indebte.;,se.
witness (a debt collector) swore positively that lifeed"-etery
the defendant the amount of the account, and the
dam admitted that it was correct. doled
The defendant's attorney said that his clieothgt duei
this, although be admitteadmitted)a part of the sum ties:- to e
but as he had no evidence, of course he roust ov—i
verdict, ths"
The plaintiff's attorney applied for a certificates do
this was a case to be tried in the superior courts, re'
cause of action arose in the county-, and detends°-
sided in the City. iuk
The Learned SECONDARY said that he did not
he ought to take upon himself to decide the Pe ere:
some orders Mr. Justice Patteson had directed tueirioll
siding
judge to exercise the same ower as be
,;die;
would have. In such case thepresiding Judge rY
quire into the matter, but he (the Learned See °o3l3b'ears'l
mu,t leave this cane for decision of a judge 9't Clll6
DO°
The jury, therefore, gave a verdict for the /3

MIDDLESEX SESSIONS'
(THIS DAY.) aie eakt
William Barker pleaded not guilty to an °L.
charging him with stealing, on the night of the
January, 40 sovereigns, two half-sovereign%, .oclt,
crowns, and 10s., the property of John Georgo
a sailor.
uestionf
The prosecutor stated that on the night in q
about eleven o'clock, he was
'proceeding down Geld°'
bid,
little for,
hill, Shad well, when a female came and spok
and he pushed her away. He proceeded on 2,cy13,'
ther when she came up again, in company o 173°C
wi • oner
and after talking to her a little while he felt the Pris d
be
hand in his pocket, when ho caught hold of hire' ginht
ran away. Ho ran after him, and the prisoner nets
hold of t,im by the cravat, and some others bells the
very much. He was quite sure the prisoner wia-aio•
man, as ho had never lost sight of him for a sink but
meat. He had taken only a glass or two of 013`r;h"-'pri-
was not drunk. When the policeman Caine up ''-eating
soner said ho would give him into custody for the
his watch, but he made a counter statement, en bed
prisoner was taken into custo.ly When ha was e,e3;,„ his
none
of the property of the prosecutor was found
p)sses,,ion.
Mr.aa lIKSON, for the
his
contended that °ill;
take hua been made in his identiiy. conclleecb ben't
calling several witnesses., vho gave him all ec
character fur honesty.

The LORD CHANCELLOR heard appeals to-claP
poi
MILLER V. HUDDLESTONR.
Mr. LLOYD replied to-day in this part-beard appeal
from the. juegment of the late Vice-Chancellor of
_o°y,
land, Sir Lancelot Shad well. The facts of the case 7130
be leaned from the following short staternentt--b
aCbreswick, by his will, dated in 1834, gave to his
erty
• d his three nephews all his reel and personal Plater
upon trust, to dispose of and collect the same, silus-ibe
paying his debts and funeral expenses to loges lies,
money arising from the sale in Government sears
tea
,
George
Miller, out of the interest and dividends to payt°
tater's daughter, Mary Ann Miller, wife 0, Lasts
Miller, an annuity of 500/. for her life for her "r;
use; and out of the interest and dividends to nip;
brother, William Creswick, annuity of 100 L ith 00
and after the payment of the several 011,,
a_ eoe.
trust to pay the remainder of the interest or diva
arising trona said investment and from the rents an ilich
fits of the testator's leasehold and freehold propertf bet
should remain unsold to his wife for her life, and °ete.sool.
death to pay Mary Ann Miller another annuity 19` holt
for her lite if she should have no child then living; on.
she should then or afterwards have any child the tr. out
nuities should cease, and the trustees were to risq„" the
of the trust fund a stun of 20,000/, and invest is 1" for
funds on trust to pay the interest' to Mrs. Mille? her
her
life for her separate use, and the capital ooe
death to be divided among her children, or if but the
child then to be paid to that child on its attainiegnia
age of 21; and if all the children died before Atlairesi•
the_ age of 21, then the 30,000/. was to fsll into the 'dip
duary estate. The testator gave his wife power 1° and
pose by will of 5,0001., part of his residuary, esthater'llfs'
to dispose of 1,000/. more thereof by gift I° "Ae-thipl‘
time, among her three co-trustees as she should 'after
proper. The testator died in 1840, and his widow. sok
exercising her power of appointment, died in 1843. lies
Miller, the daughter, had no child, and the two 0,1191bi1l
of 5001. falling into arrear, she, in 1848, filed 6 00
against the trustees. The two sums appointed Vase
widow of the testator remained unpaid, and there we 10
no properties in the hands of the trustees suloc",;,l,
pay them and the arrears of the annuities. The Itess
lion raised by the bill under these circumstances 'ro.
whether the annuities and the gifts should MAN She
portionally, or whether the uneuities should ""te,
priority and be paid out of the capital of the ei4i4o.
The Vice-Chancellor held that the annuities were 1;t
titled to priority, and to a payment out of the esP'';di
the dividends were insufficient, and against that
ment the present appeal was brought.
The LORD Cl/ANCELLOI, at the conclusion of the re'
ply, postponed his juigment.

ROLLS' COURT.—(THIS DAVdo
Ills Lordship the Master of the Rolls continued '
hearing of motions to-day.

CUNLIFIE V. WIIALLEY.
The arguments iu this part-heard motion, for an tip)
junction, were resumed, and occupied the Court
greater part of the morning.

VICE-CHANCERY.—('PHIS
(Before the Vice-Chancellor KNIGIIT BRVC°./tion6
The Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce heard Pell col
to-day, but none came More him calling for °Pe
notice.
(Before Vice-Chancellor Lord CRANWORTO•Lster
His Lorddhip having disposed of the ca6o Of Xpvto ja
v. Handley, proceeded to hear the further argunie.hieb
the part-heard case of Macintyre v. Connell, "
lasted the remainder of the morning.

QUEEN'S BENCH.-(THIS DAY;
,Sittings in Banco,
• before Lord CAMPBELL and
jp
PATTESON, COLERIDGE, and % IGHTSIN•? 049
'"'"
HAWKER V. CAMERON'S COALBROOK STEAM C°
LOUGHOR RAILWAY COMPANY.—JUDGMENT.
,„ CO'
Lord CAMPBELL said that having taken time ba, for
Sider the motion fur a rule to set aside the Yerdienoigi
the plaintiff in this case, and having -had an opPort;000
of inspecting the bills of exchange on which of
the
ac•
was brought, and having compared the form or "" too
cepiances with the requisitions ot the Act of Parlisle.l3
which the action was founded, the Court was of OW
that no rule ought to be granted.
Rule refused accordingly.
THE QUEEN V. THE SOUTHAMPTON DOCK COMO-
JUDGMENT. 'bleb

Lord CAMPBELL said that the first question w°'el•
arose, among others, in this case was, whether the Or is
lents were liable to be rat.-d to the relief of the 100 the
respect of certain premises of which they wer6,oo,
owners, but not the occupiers, namely, the CuNO9.
house, in the occupation or the Commissioners of I.lis
toms, at the rent of 5001. aear, and a manufactori,„,,,
the occupation of the West Inydia Mail-packet Cool"'
at the rent of 4001. a year, and several workshops
a. du
His LORDSHIP, having reviewed the facts and r°,i.
merits applicable to the case, said the Court was of ~6cl
w'- nion that the Learned Recorder in the Court belo
rightly disposed of all the questions brought before
and that the order of Sessions should be affirmed. oi
THE GOVERNOR AND COMPANY OF COPPER MINOS
ENGLAND U. FOX AND OTHERS. Of
Lord CAMPBELL said, in this case the Court wa5
opinion that the rule should be made absolute.
HAY v. AYLING.—JUDGMENT. 0 a
Lord CAMPBELL said, in tbis case the Court W ;to
opinion that the verdict for the defendant ought 110
be disturbed.