The Sun.
London, England, 1833-01-31 00:00:00

and I'd have you avoid France, too, or you'll get he
("allies. As the offence you have committed was
not committed in this country, I shall discharge you.
Brown—l'll be off in an instant, my Lord.
The LORD MAYOR—And let me tell you once
more that you are the most shameless and insen-
sible fellow I ever beheld. You show a total ab
sence of all feeling in the presence of your .rind be-
nefactor, whom you ought to blush to see. If it
were in my power I would indict severe punishment
upon you, but the press has protected the public
from any further immediate frauds at your hands.
You have thrown away opportunities which pru-
dence and integrity would, no doubt, have made
available in a very exalted degree, and leave that bar
with the contempt of all who have witnessed the
extraordinary course of your proceedings.
Brown—What have I done, my Lord ? What
is it, after all, but a little debt ?—(Great laughter.)
The Chevalier then departed, and the multitude
soon disappeared from the justice-room.

G UILDHALL.
MISCHIEF OF MINT REWARDS.—Yeaterday Thos.
Perkins was re-examined before Mr. Alderman
WOOD on suspicion of conspiring with Benjamin
Charles Murray to get an old man named William
Low, who used to keep a frnir-stall and sell birds
in the road nea► the Horns at Kennington, convicted
of having base coin in his possession, with the view
of obtaining a reward from the Mint. Murray ap-
peared voluntarily to meet the charge.
Low repeated his statement, that Perkins called
at his cottage at Kennington, and induced him to
accompany him to Holborn-hill to sell a linnet; that
Perkins, telling him he was known and afraid of
being stopped, persuaded him (Low) to carry in his
hat, till they met the customer for the linnet, three
papers, which were found to contain a bad half-
crown and four bad shillings; that Perkins, after
leaving him a few minutes at a public-house on
Holborn-hill, called him out, and he was instantly
secured by two city policemen and another per-
son.

Mr. Alderman WooD, after questioning Low and
his wife at considerable length, asked the prisoner
Perkins what he had to say to the charge.
Perkins—The greater part of it was false. Low
had been tutored to say these things against him by
the smashers in the Compter, who had a spite
against him.
Alderman WOOD—How is that ? Did you ever
give information to the Mint ? Perkins—Yes, I
have, often.
Alderman WOOD—How were you paid ? Per-
kins—l have received money.
Alderman WooD—For giving evidence ? Per-
kins—l don't know what it was for.
Alderman WooD—What did you get ? Perkins
—I received but two payments.
Alderman WooD—Well, how much did you re-
ceive? Perkins—Thirty pounds.
Alderman WooD—lndeed ! Can you tell me
who were convicted in consequence of your infor-
mation ? Perkins—There was George Roberts and
George Bagley. They were caught making money.
Alderman WOOD—Any others ? Perkins—Yes;
there were two more people, but I cannot recollect
their names.
Alderman WOOD—Do you remember the name
Myers? Prisoner (with some emotion)—Yes.
Alderman WooD—What is he ? He keeps a
tobacconist's shop in the Newington-catpeway. He
is a constable, but I have done no business with
him lately.
Alderman WOOD—How long have you been in
the employ of Mr. Powell, of the Mint ? Prisoner
I am not employed as a constancy. I have done
nothing for him these twelve months.
Alderman WooD—Then in what period did you
receive the thirty pounds ? Prisoner—Perhaps
eighteen months.
Murray, who fetched the two policemen from the
station-house to seize Low, was then asked if be
wished to make any statement.
Murray replied that Low was notoriously a re-
surrection-man, and had been discharged from the
Greyhound at Kennington fur concealing a dead
body in the stables that bad been brought up by a
VA aggon.
Low declared he had not been employed at the
Greyhound, nor had he ever stolen a corpse, or
been charged before a Magistrate with any of-
ence whatever.
Mr. Alderman WOOD desired Roe, the city of-
ficer, to make inquiry into Low's character.
The ALDERMAN then put a few questions to the
two policemen, Protheroe and Scott, by whom Low
was apprehended. Protheroe said he saw Murray
either one or two days before he brought the infor-
mation. Had seen Scott and Murray together se-
veral times. tie did not mean to deny that he had,
with Scott, visited the Rotunda to see the horse-
manship, and converse with Murray, who was hired
there. Scott said the third person who assisted
them in securing Low was a man named Rose, a
pork-butcher, who was accidentally passing, but
with whom he was acquainted.
Per kins being questioned by the Magistrate, said
he also was acquainted with Mr. Rose.
Mr. Alderman WooD ordered Murray to be
taken into custody, and said the conduct of the po-
licemen should undergo further examination before
the Police Committee. The case required more in-
vestigation, but it appeared to him to be a revival of
the old system of conspiracy to obtain reward.
He remanded the prisoners for further examination.
MAR YLEB ONE.
Mr. Robert Taylor (not the pseudo parson) was
yesterday charged with intermarrying with Miss
Frances Sadler, his first wife, Attn Carpenter, now
being living.
The certificates of both marriages were handed to
the Magistrate by Mr. Swath man, of No. 3, Little
St. Andrew-street, Seven-dials, who proved that
Taylor had married Miss Ann Carpenter, as a
bachelor, by bans, at St. Marylebone church, on the
.sth of May, 1815. He also proved the second mar-
riage to his present wife, Miss Frances Sadler, by
bans, at St. Pancras new church, on the 26th of
January, 1832, being a lapse of 17 years between
the marriages.
Mr. William Cummins sworn—l was the butler
to Mr. Bingham Baring, and a witness to the mar.
riage. I know that the prisoner (Taylor) has been
cohabiting with Frances Sadler, as his wife, at
No. 22, John-street, Edgeware-road.
Mr. EAWLINSON—Send for her.
Mrs. Frances Taylor here deposed that she (the
second wife) was married to Mr. Robert Taylor on
the 26th of January last year, at the St. Pancras
new church, tier sister (Mary) and Mr. Cummins
then being both present. She could not recollect
the name of the clergyman who had " coupled"
them. She owned, with great reluctance, that the
prisoner and herself had lived together in service for
several years, and that he had betrothed her, in
reality, long before he knew his alleged wife.—
(Here she burst into tears.)—Remanded till Monday.

ANECDOTE OF LORD TENTERDEN.—On
the trial of Mr. HONE before Lord TENTERDEN, on a
charge of blasphemy, his Lordship behaved with great for-
bearance, and indulged the defendant in his deviations from
the ordinary rules observed on such occasions. The de-
fendant was not content with the indulgence shown him,
and, addressing his Lordship, said, " My Lord, even in a
Turkish Court I should not have met with the treatment I
experience here." " Certainly not," said Lord TENTER,
DEN, " the bow-string would have been round your neck an
hour ago,".—Lepal EJaminer.