The Sun.
London, England, 1834-04-25 00:00:00

BEER HOUSES.

On the motion of Lord KENYON, an humble address
was ordered to be presented to his Majesty, praying that he
would be graciously pleased to order that there be
laid before the house all communications made to
the Secretary of State for the Home Department, by
county magistrates relative to the evil effects produced by
the Beer Bill.

The Bishop of LINCOLN presented petitions from dif-
ferent parts of Lincolnshire for the protection of the esta-
blished church.

Lord SUFFIELD presented petitions from Norwich,
and several other places in the county of Norfolk, for the
better observance of the Sabbath. The petition from
Norwich was signed by no less than 3,529 persons.
Lord TEYNHAM, in presenting a petition, took the
opportunity of defending himself from the attack made
against him last night by a noble earl then present,
with reference to a case in which he had been con-
cerned in the Court of King's Bench. On the
case being mentioned by the noble earl, the learned lord
on the woolsack, stated that this house ought not to take
cognizance of the subject, as doubtless a new trial would
take place. He could assure the house that every exertion
would be made on his part to obtain a new trial, and he
had no hesitation in saying that he should then be enabled
to refute all the calumnies that had gone forth against him.
The Earl of WINCHILSEA regretted that the subject
had again been brought forward in that place... He did
not intend to take any further notice of the matter, and all
he would say then was, that it was a most unfortunate
affair.

Petitions in favour of a better observance of the Sab-
bath Day were presented by the Bishops of London and
Lichfield and Coventry, and by the Earl of Roseberry,
to the same effect from the presbyteries of Stirling and
Skye.

GREY presented several petitions from dissenters,
complaining of the grievances under which they labour,
and praying for relief.
The Duke of GORDON presented a petition from
the parish of Forres, against any alteration in the
present system of church patronage in Scotland, and se-
veral from places in Scotland in favour of the alliance be-
tween Church and State.

Earl FITZWILLIAM presented petitions from pro-
testant dissenters residing at Taunton, York, Huntingdon,
and several other places, praying for relief, and the better
observance of the Sabbath.

The Noble Earl also presented a petition from the dissen-
ters of Bramley, praying for relie, and amongst other
things for the separation of church and state ; and that the
bishops might be removed from the House of Lords.
Earl CAMDEN presented petitions from several places
in Brecknock, for the better observance of the Sabbath.
Lord WHARNCLIFFE presented petitions from pa-
rishes in the West Riding of York, praying that no alte-
ration in the corn laws might take place.
The Duke of RICHMOND presented a petition from
a parish in .the county of Sussex, complaining of the
evils of the beer shops.—Referred to the committee ap-
pointed to consider the Beer Act.
The Marquis of WESTMEATH presented a petition
from the justices of the peace of the western district of
the county of Westmeath, complaining of the present
state of the law affecting Fin shops.
The Bishop of EX? TER presented a petition from
Exeter for the better observance of the Sovereign.
ENGLISH AND IRISH JUDGMENTS B 1 LL.
On the motion of Lord WYNFORD the bill was l•ead
a third time and passed.