The Sun.
London, England, 1851-03-01 00:00:00

LONDON, SATURDAY EVENING, MARCH 1, 1851.

short months, become the law of the land. At this
moment the assistance and advice of "the Iron•
Duke," the "Hero of a Hundred Fights," has been
sought for by his SOVEREIGN. It is perfectly clear that
it is as a mediator that the Gallant Duke is required—
at his advanced age he would naturally be
unwilling to embark on the stormy sea
of politics, and encounter the cares and
anxieties of official life ; but deservedly he has
immense influence with men of all parties ; his sug-
gestions would be listened to with affectionate re-
spect, and would, if at all practicable, bring matters
to an amicable and satisfactory conclusion. Nothing
certain has as yet been decided on, but from
present appearances it is probable that a " Ministry
of Transition" may be patched up, to carry on the
necessary business until the measure ren-
dered necessary by the late Papal aggres-
sion receives the legislative sanction, or be
finally disposed of in one way or the other.
This may be done if the PRECIOUS Budget be with-
drawn, and a successor found for Sir CHARLES WOOD ;
for we are firmly convinced that the country will
never assent to the resumption of office, even for a
single day, by the most unfortunate and most incom-
petent financier that was ever pitchforked, through
family influence and unblushing nepotism, into the
head of an important department, for the arduous du-
ties of which he was totally and entirely disqualified.
It appears that when Lord STANLEY was first in-
formed of the resignation of the late Ministry, and
called upon by his SOVEREIGN to advise on the- course
most advisable to be adopted under such circum•
stances, he inquired the nature of the causes that
bad led to such a course. On hearing the slender
majority on Mr. DISRAELI'S motion, and the decisive
defeat on Mr. LocKE KING'S proposition assigned as
reasons—although the Noble Lord participated in the
opinion to which we have long since given ex-
pression, " that these were not the only grounds,
or even the principal cause of that resignation"—
he strongly recommended her MAJESTY to try whe-
ther it was not possible in the first instance to
strengthen the then Government, or to reconstruct it
by a combination with those who, not holding office,
concurred in the opinions of the Ministers, and felt
the necessity of union. If such an arrangement
should prove impracticable he (Lord STANLEY) might
be enabled to obtain the assistance of a portion of the
third, or intermediate party—the Peelites, by which
his difficulties would be greatly diminished. But if
he could not obtain that assistance, and if
personal considerations stood in the way
of the formation of a Government of those
whose opinions appeared to prevail in the House
of Commons, he, Lord STANLEY, not underrating the
difficulties which he should have to encounter, would
prefer any responsibility, and even the chance of
failure and loss of reputation, to that of leaving her
MAJESTY and the country without a Government."
Such was the judicious advice which the Noble Lord
tendered to his SOVEREIGN under the peculiar cir-
cumstances of the case. He thought it but an act of
justice to his rivals to afford the fullest opportunity of
retrieving their position, and he Also thought that his
negotiations with a certain portion of the party which
formerly followed Sir ROBERT PEEL could be
better carried on if the attempt at an arrangement
with tha RUSSELL Ministry had been tried and
proved unsuccessful. This led to the sending for
Lord JOHN RUSSELL on Saturday evening, and the
various interviews between the late Premier, and the
Earl of ABERDEEN and Sir JAMES GRAHAM.
Unfortunately, there was one point that prevented
the cordial alliance between these parties, which would
have overcome all the obstacles. Sir JAMES
GRAHAM and his former colleague were conscientiously,
opposed to the Ecclesiastical Titles Bill, and al-
though resenting the haughty tone assumed by the
POPE in his bull, and by Cardinal WISEMAN
in his pastoral, they could not consent toany legislation
on the subject ; while Lord Jones RUSSELL, although
willing to modify the measure to some extent, in
order, if possible, to come to an agreement based on
mutual concessions, could not consent to abandon the
entire question. This, then, was, as Sir JAMES
GRAHAM happily, although we believe without
premeditation, denominated it, " the cardinal
point " that rendered the junction impossible. The
Right Honourable Gentleman and the Noble Earl,
with whom he was associated, were, however, too
well aware of the state of publio opinion to believe it
possible to carry on a Government framed on the
principle of non legislation on the Papal aggression.
Toffs was his sole difficulty. He would not be
a member of any Government that would introduce or
support such a measure, and he was well aware that
no Ministry could stand against the popular feeling
in favour of repelling the unwarrantable invasion on
the prerogatives of the Crown, and the independence
of the British nation. We rejoice, however, to find
that although this temporary obstruction prevented
a coalition, " agreement on other points not
being impossible," the terms used between
those statesmen were those of mutual esteem
and friendship, and, as we have already
stated such as afford an early prospect of co-opera-
tion in a powerful and united Cabinet—a Cabinet
not based on family compacts, or red tapism, but
which will give the best men that can be obtained
to the service of their country. Lord STANLEY
then tried whether he could recruit his forces from
the neutral party, and with that view communi-
cated with Lord CANNING and Mr. GLADSTONE,
but the same obstacle prevented the fusion
of which he was so desirous. The Pro-
tectionist chief felt the necessity of repelling the
aggression as powerfully as the Whig Ministry
he would, if at the head of the Government,
have introduced even a more stringent mea-
sure than that already before the House of
Commons. Suffice it to say, that a brief interview
proved that Mr. GLADSTONE could not, consistently
with his views, take part in an Administration pre-
sided over by the Noble Lord. He also ap-
pealed to various members of his own party,
but even there he was unable to enlist
promising recruits. Three or four refusals to
join in the forlorn hope convinced him of the useless-
ness of the attempt, and he waited upon her MAJESTY
and abandoned the arduous undertaking upon which
he had entered.

The advice and assistance of the Duke of MIL-
LINGTON is now to be taken, but his Grace is absent
at Strathfieldsaye, where he has, according to his cus-
tom, been entertaining the Judges now on circuit in
that district. We have no doubt, however, that he
will speedily arrive in town, and that his valuable
aid may overcome every impediment. Let
the, people rest contented, the great cause
of free trade cannot possibly be injured, and
we have learned from Lord JOHN RUSSELL that
a large extension of the suffrage is resolved upon,
although we must express our deep regret at the
terms in which the Noble Lord alluded to the " depri-
vation of the House of Commons of those Conser-
vative elements which ought to belong to it." And
the depreciating tone in which he spoke "of a House
of Commons merely representing numbers." What-
ever, then, may be result of the present crisis,
the popular, cause cannot be injured, and we
trust that it will be materially benefited
by a wiser and more equitable financial
administration than that of Sir CHARLES Woon,
than whom it would be impossible to find a more in-
competent or incapable Minister of Finance.

Many publication's of every form, size, and price,
hare issued from the press on the subject of the Papal
aggression, and the division of the English soil into
ecclesiastical districts at the mere will and pleasure
of a foreign Prince, who not only_arranged and deter-
mined the several sees, but nominated the various in-
cumbents, without the sanction or assent of the
English Government, and without obtaining the suf-
frage of any person owing allegiance to the British
SOVEREIGN. This arrogant assumption was but a
continuation of a claim that had long been asserted by
successive Popes, and which had at all times been stea-
dily and energetically resisted by the English people.
On the late occasion the public feeling was excited
to the highest d2grce of indignation -at the unwar-
ranted invasion of the Royal prerogative and
vo
usurpa-
tion, hi
of the national independence. The then prime
Minister, Lord JOHN RUSSELL, came forward
boldly, and in a letter to the
.ca
Bishop of
vieNs
1 DURHAM
not
oniexpressed
respecting clearly
thatandunjustifiable
t! ne nl
but against another evil of even greater megpi.
tulle, Whiell had long excited the reasonable appre.

hensions of the cornmumity—the Puseyite and Trac-
tarian predilections of a numerous body of the
clergymen of the Eitablishei Church, and which if
persevered in was eminently calculated to endanger
the Protestant institutions of the country.
The traitors within the citadel were un•
doubtedly more formidable than the enemy without ;
the internal strife was more fatal to the well-being of
that church than any external attack could possibly
be. But, though we have had a measure introduced
to obviate the consequences of that " aggression by a
foreign Sovereign," which, notwithstanding the
virulent opposition which it encountered on the first
reading, was affirmed by an overwhelming majority
of 332, nothing has been e: en suggested against
the more alarming danger arising from the "clergymen
of our Churcb, who having subscribed the Thirty-nine
Articles and acknowledged in explicit terms the
QUEEN'S supremacy," have been most forward in
leading their flocks, "step by step, to the very
verge of the precipice." Nothing has been done to
remove those who "are with us but not of us," who
are in the enjoyment of high preferment and hand-
some revenues from ecclesiastical sources, although
not acknowledging the fundamental principles of that
Church, being a sort of half-caste between the two
great creeds, although holding a far larger proportion
of the Roman Catholic than of the Protestant doc-

trines.
The dangers arising from this source have been most
ably exposed in a pamphlet* which has recently
appeared in the shape of a letter to the Lord Bishop
of LONDON, on the promulgation of the recent Papal
Bull. The learned author proves that the Papal re-
script is the natural consequence of the Tractarian
movement—that " it is a bird from the Puseyite nest.''
He censures the culpable indifference, or rather direct
encouragement, which some of the bench of Bishops
afforded to the innovators in the early part of their
career, and which eventually produced the evils that
are so deeply to be deplored, but which were totally
disregarded by the great majority of the prelates and
dignitaries of the Church, until they found that "their
revenues, episcopal and cathedral, were about to be
swept into the coffers of the Vatican."
On this subject the learned author thus addresses
the Right Rev. Bishop :
"The subject which at present agitates the public mind is one
of most intense interest. Looking to the ascendancy which
Puszyisss has, within the last twelve years gained amongst
us, and to the numbers that have joined the Church
of Rome, we see but too painfully the sad and solemn
fruits of it. It is to its activity and influence that this vol-
canic eruption in the reb.grous world may be traced. All
the evil we are now bewailing has its source in the schism
of this party, and their abandonment of the reformed faith.
A deep responsibility attaches to your Lordship, if it shall be
found that you were accessory to it. You are very generally
believed to be so, and sufficient evidence is not wanting to
establish the fact."
In proof of this assertion he refers to the corre-
spondence which took place, in 1843, between the
Bishop and certain members of the congregation
holding pews and sittings in St. Paul's Chapel, which,
coupled with the charge of the Bishop of EXETER in
1845, "may easily account for the prognostic of the
Vatican and the vicars-apostolic, that before many
years passed away England would become a Catholic
country, and the crucifix of St. PaTER's displace the
ball of SL Penes." He then proceeds to show the
true nature of those attempts that were regarded with
so much leniency by the Episcopacy :
" There are mysteries in the world of theology as well as
in the natural world, and we must content ourselves, there-
fore, with antheaticated facts, without seeking for unsearch-
able causes. One fact is, beyond all, prominent; and it is
this:—That there is a powerful religious party in the Church
who are for bringing us under the priestly authority of the
darker ages, and restoring that dominion from which the Re-
formation set us free.
"The rapid progress of intelligence among the middling
and working classes has become a source of fear, as what-
ever strengthens independence weakens authority. The
bulk of the nation are beginning toithink and reason; it is
one of the signs of the times, and to the hierarchy, it is
the most alarming sign. It is natural to ask, why should it
be so? This is a searching question ; and, were an answer
honestly given to it it would be this :—lf we can succeed in
restoring the Catholic faith, the object we have deepest at
heart will be attained; the sovereignty of the Priest will dis-
place the sovereignty of the people; and we shall then have,
as we had before the Reformation, a Church Government
that all looked np to with awe, when the word of the
preacher was received as the word of God, and his will as
the will of Heaven. It is thus in Rome; we are striving
to have it thus in England ; it is to this and to those days
we would return.
"But, my Lord, it cannot be; the stern spirit of our
Saxon ancestors is hereditary; never will Englishmen be
again brought under the Papal yoke ; no persuasive addresses
from Dr. Pusey— no exhortation from Cardinal Wiseman—
no proclamation from the Pope will avail anything; it is
ploughing the rocks. No scheme for bringing the children
of the poorer classes under clerical direction will succeed.
Your Lordship's declaration, that no scheme of national
education shall receive 1. our sanction which dews not leave the
appointment of schoolmaster in the hands of the clergy,' is
derided for its meddling, and despised fur its arrcgance.' "
The learned author then adverts to the system of
religious instruction provided for the children of the
poor by the National School Society, and the West-
minster Training Institution, which he asserts to have
a Puseyite tendency ; and this opinion he sustains
by extracts from the Cathechisin put into the hands
of children, with regard to the worship of images, of
saints, of the Virgin MARY, and also on the duty of
eonfession, or, to use the milder term, " of seeking
counsel from the clergy."
There is another topic to which he alludes with
considerable power—the intrigues of the Jesuits, to
which he asserts that the recent aggression may in a
great degree be traced. On this point he refers to the
clauses relating to that body in the Emancipation
Act, which manifest a sincere resolution to rid this
kingdom of those wily schemers, but et hich have
been, as well as those relating to territorial
titles, permitted to remain dead letters on the na-
tional statute. book. To show the real danger arising
from the machinations of this body, he refers to the
secret instructions of the Jesuits, from which he
gives copious extracts, particularly respecting their
mode of ingratiating themselves with persons of rank
and wealth—the manner in which " rich widows are
to be gained over"—how the hold is to be maintained,
and the way their wealth is to be disposed of—how
their children are to be treated, in order to make
them embrace a religious life—how the revenues of
the College are to be increased, and a variety of
other subjects of intense interest.
In every respect, this little publication will be
found well worthy of perusal ; and we have no
doubt that it will be eagerly sought after by every
sincere Protestant, when told that it emanated
from the talented writer of the well-known " Tracts
of an Anti-Tractarian." A second letter was also
promised—but that hope, alas ! can never be realized.
PROVIDENCE has interposed an insuperable barrier
—the mind that conceived is no longer the tenant of
an earthly habitation, the hand that penned is for
ever stilled—within forty-eight hours after the last
page was written the gifted and accomplished
JAMES SEDGWICX breathed his last while a guest
with his old Mend and former junior, the LORD
CHIEF BARON of the Exchequer. It is unnecessary
to add a single word in favour of the latest publica-
tion of the late Chairman of the Board of Taxes to
any of those who had the honour of his acquaint-
ance. By every one who knew him he was respected
and esteemed. The courtesy and amenity displayed
on every occasion, the strict fidelity with which he
discharged the duties of his station, endeared him to
all with whom he had any intercourse, and eminently
entitled him to the public gratitude.
A too conscientious discharge of that duty was
perhaps injurious to his own pecuniary interests, and
probably led to his retirement on a pension but
insurances
one-third of that which he had reasonable grounds to
expect. The falling-off of income thus occasioned
prevented him from keeping up
he had formerly effected, and will, we
believe, which
materially affect the future fortunes of his amiable
daughter. We trust that many will desire to possess
themselves of the last production of JAMES SEDGWICX.
We can assure the public that none will regret having
acted on our advice.

* " A Letter to the Lord Bishop of Loudon on the Pro-
mulgation of the Recent Papal Bull. By' a Barrister." Lon-
don J. Ridgway, Piccadilly; W. at d 'l'. Piper, Paternoster-
TOW.

LONDON SACRED HARMONIC SOCIETY, EXETER
HALL.—The oratorio of the Messiah was admirably per-
formed here last night by the members of this society, under
the able direction of Mr. Surman. The solo parts were sus-
tained by Miss Louisa Tyne, Miss M. Williams, Mrs. Temple,
Mr. Lawler, and Mr. Donald King. It is the first time we have
ever had the pleasure ofhearing Mr. Donald King sing Handel's
music, but we are convinced that from the admirable man-
ner in which be acquitted himself last evening he must be-
come very popular with the Exeter Hall audience. He is
thoroughly imbued with the true Handelian spirit. The hall
was crowded.

ROYAL ACADEMY OF Music —Amongst the
alterations in the general instruction given to the pupils at
this institution, a series of lectures have been adopted by the
committee, and the Rev. J. Richardson has been appointed
to give lectures on English history or literature. The Ar-
ra❑gements have been very satisfactory to all parties con-
cerned.

THE SHARE MARKETS.
BRITISH RAILWAYS

Railways. I Paid.

Nominal Prices.

Business done
to-day.

Aberdeen.. .. • • • •
Do. Preference •• • •
Am bergate, ttingham,
Boston, & E. Junclon
Ayrshire and Galloway • •
Belfast and County Down
lurks and Hants Eaten.
(Great Western Per-
petual 5 per cent.) ..
Birmingham and Oxford!
Junction, calls duly!
paid, or with a guar..
Do. without a guar...
Binning., Wolverhamp-
ton, and Dudley, calls,
duly paid, or with al
guarantee .. . I
Do. without a guar. ••I
Binning., Woiverhamp.,'
and Stour Valley .. I
Birkenhead, Lancas., and!
Cheshire Junction .•
Bristol and Exeter.. ••
Buckinghamshire • • • •
Caledonian
Do. 111/. Preference ••
Do. Clydesdale June.
Chester and Holyhead
Do. Preference ..
Clarence .. .. • • ••l
Do. Ist Class, 6 per MI
Do. 2•1 de., 5 per cent.!
Do. Gov. Loan,4 pr. ct.l
Direct Load. and Portsm.
Dublin and Belfast Junct. I
Dublin and Kingstown..
Dundalk and Enniskillen
East Anglian (251. L. &
E. and L. & D.)
Do (181. E. & H.)
Do. (31. 10s.) 6 per
cent. Preference

Do. (51.) 7 pr. ct. Pref.'
Do. (7 1. 17807 p. c.Pref.
Eastern Counties .. • . 2
Do. Exteu., 5 per cent.
No. 1 •• • • • • 6 1
Do. No. 2 • • • • • • 6 1
Do. New Preference, 6
per cent... • • I
Do. North. and East.
6 per cent. • • .. 5,
Do. do. 5 per cent .. 5'
Do. do., New • • • • 4.
Eastern Union, class A,
late E. U. shares • • 2
Do. do. do. ..
Do. do., B& C shares 9,
Do. do., scrip, guaran.
6 per cent. .. • • 21
East Lancashire .. • • 2.
Do. New quarters
Do. 6 per cent. prof.
quarter shares.. ••
East Lincolnshire, put. 6
pet cent .. • • • • 2.
Edinburgh and Glasgow 5,
Edin., Perth, and Dundee 2!
Do. Newport .. • . 1!
Exeter and Exmouth .. 1
Glasgow and South- West, 51
Do. pref. consolidated;
Do. do. G. D. &C. stock! 8
Gloucester &DeauForest 11
Great Northern .. • • 2.
Do. halves, A, deferred
Do. halves, B, 6 per ct.
Do. 5 per cent. pref. •• 11
Great Southern and
Western, Ireland • • 51
Do. eighths .. • • !
Great North of England . 101
Do. new 401. 41
Do. new 301. 31
Do. new 151 • .. 11
Great Western .. • • 101
Do. Now, 171. .. .•
Hull and Selby ..
Do. half shares .. 2!
Do. quarter shares ..
Lancaster and Carlisle .. 51
Do. thirds • • • • •• 11 1;
Lancaster and Preston .. 4'
Lancashire and Yorkshire 101
Do. quarter shares 2!
Do. fifths . 1
Do. F. 20/. ..
Do. new, guaranteed 6
per cent. .. • • 10
Do. Pludders. & Sheff. 51
Do. West Riding Union 1
Leeds and Bradford .. 51
Leeds and Thirak • • .• 6,
Do. pref. 6 p ct., No. 1
Do. pref. 6 p ct., No. 2 1'
Do. pref. 6 p ct., No. 3
Do. pref. qrs., 1848 .. 1
Liverpool, Crosby, and
Southport .. .. • 1,
London and Blackwall 11
London, Brighton, and
South Coast .. • • 101
Do. guarteed. 5 per ct.,
late Croyd.n thirds • • 10'
Do. preference, 5 p et. 101
Do. preference, cenv. 5
per cent., 1852 .• 51
Do. new guaranteed., 6
per cent. 10
London and Greenwich . 12 1,
Do. preference .
London and N.-Western 101
Do. do. new quarters 11
Do. fifths .. 11
Do. 101. sh., M. & It (c)
London and 8.-11 eaters . 101
Do. new 501. .. .. 4
Do. new 401. .. •• 3
Do. new preference .•
Londonderry & Coleraine
Do. half shares 1
Lowestoft, guar. 4 per ct. 21
Do. do. 6 per cent. .. 21
Londonderry and Email-
killen. .. • • • • 21
Do. half shares • • .. 11
Manchester, Buxton, and
Matlock • . 1
Manchester, Sheffield, &
Lincolnshire .. 101
Do. quarters, No. 1 .. 21
Do. new, 1W preference 11
Do., 64 Preference ..
Do. Manchester and
Lincoln Union
Midland • • • •
Do. consolidated prof.
Do. 50/. shares .. • •
Do. Blinking & Derby It
1)o. CousA. Bristol &I
Birrnwg., 6 per cent. 101
Do. Bristol & Gloms. 41
Do. do. do. • . ,83 1
Do. Erewash Val. pref.! 5
Do. Leic. & Swanning.
8 per cent. guar. . • 11
Midland Gt. West. (Ire.)
Middlesbro' and Reclear,
6 per cent. guar. ..
Newcastle and Carlisle..
Do. quarter shares ..
Newmarket • •

.. I 4

..:. 6%

21, - 22%
16 - 14,

8 ..

15 22

••
—9O dia.

3% -34 i
2% -9%

3 1

13 4
1 4 par

to I lox

i 0 155
13 I 4

-1%
-1
-63

% r
Si P

- 11

67
6 p

6 -6%

4 - 434

10 11754

6% 2%
6W ••

15 211%
50 31%
16 7

15 18%
L 2% 6%
[2% 12%
[2% 13%

XI 1242

14g
3%

-324
- 3536
-7%

% P•
245

90 —9l
2 15 Cs.
100 102
60 —5l

!Fs% 1 !2% 23%

- 78

[3 4 8 - 9 p.
17% 29 -31 p

)0 57 —54
15 10% 1014 ft.
11% 7% 7 dis,
6 1% I% dia.

!SO - 131

UM 6 —6% die,
50 06% 07%
50 14% 15►~(
9 336 —2% dls.
17 3% ad's.
6 i% Ri dia.
9 % —1% I)

15 .. - ..
6 3 7% -7%

MI -90

14 - 129

Do. extension scrip .. 2 1
Newport, Abergavetuty,

and Hereford
Newry, W arrenpoint, &

Rostrevor • • ..
Norfolk ..
Do. New 201. shares..

Extension ..

Do. guar. 5% per cent.
Do. Waveney Valley..
Northern Counties Union
North British..
Do. l'reference
North Staffordshire ..
North-Western .. • •
North & th.-West. June.
Oxford, Worcester and
Wolverhampton.. ..
Preston and Wyre
Do. Halves (A) ..
Heading, Guildford, and
l;tigate .

5,
..1 2.
11

Eloystiin and Hitchln
J)e). Shepreth Exten..,
Se,,ttigh Central
Scottish Midland ..

Do. new 2
..
Sarewsbury Binning.
Clan; .. 13
Do. Class 8.. .• • • 9 1
Dc. New Guarantee..
Shrewsbury & Hereford
Shrewsbury and Cheater
(Nor. W. Min.) .. pal
Do. tial-vee
Do. Oswestry
Do. New.. ..
Do. 8 per cent. Pref. .
Shropshire Union
South J)evon

Do. Preference ..
South Staffordshire ••
South-Eastern ..

Do. do. 4% per cent...
South Wales.. .. • •
South Yerksh. and River

Dun •• •• •• ••
Shaft., Roth., and Geole,
N. Div., guar. 5 p cent.
Do. do. South Div. . •
Swansea Sr, Loughor,
Paw Vale Extension ••
names Haven Deck and
Railway .. .. . •
Vale of N eath .. .
Waterford and Kilkenny
Ditto, 51. Preference ..
Wat ertord and Limerick,
aterford, Wex., Wick.
and Dublin ..
Wear Valley, 6 per cent.
guaranteed ..
Do. do.
Do. do.
West London .
Do. let Class Pref. (10101
Do. td Class de. (par)
Whitettaven and Furness
Windsor, Staines, and 8

do. ..
do. ..

Western .. • • ..
Wilts, Somerset, & Wey-
mouth •• •• ••
York, Newcastle, & Ber-
wick ••
Ditto and Newcastle
Extension ..

Ditto G.N.E. purchase
or preference ••
Do. .. • • ..
Do. Hartlepool Dock
and Railway ..
York and Nerth Midland
Do. Preference ..

Boulogne and Amiens ..
Central of France (Or-
leans and Vierzon)
Demerara
Dutch Rhenish
East Indian
Do. do. do.
Great Indian Peninsula..

Ditto ditto ---
::
Louvain ais sambre ..
Luxembourg .... ..
Ditto ..
Madrid and Valentia ..

57 -GO

135 -138
114 - 11%
24 -25

130;4 -131%
61,4 - 6 p.
54 -5% P.
2% - 3 p.
88 -89

6►% 634 dig.
4% E i ass.
2 —2 p.

to il4

b% 1 33(

)0 3456
is 1334
10 11%
2 1 %

o 3M
61M

K.I '129%
3 -

'341..

- 15

315%
14
12%
%P
dim.,
—61%

—14 N
31

- 130%

43( - •
5%

0 1 ..

13% 14
dlt

34( yi x.d.

124 12
5%

3%
2% X
1%

6% Yi 7

4
Far

10% %

[5 Xl4

-24
—la dia.
18
—B%

-9%
-6%
- 6 MIL

17% I 6%

.. %
..
% - P

SO ls%
15 42%
10% 8

55 54%

14% 15

18% 14 14
6%
12%
13%
42 11;

- IN
- 4354
- 9 p.

20 21%
6% 71
2% I%

-21%
-8%
-.ly, p.

15 9%
12% 7

19134 99 911(

- 183
- IN
-8

5 3' 614 5 die.
12 8 4% 4 die.
$ 10 —1036

50% xd

57% us %

7%7 id
98% 4

tat% uli zd
22% h 23
17% Id

189 8954x.1

3536 35 3{
14 %
11%

ale.
62% 61% 63%
1 [63
i 20X % %

B % % XX

91( %Ili
a yi
'oh 11

Id up 15 —l6
dup 754 $
20 11 —l2
1 1% 1 die.
10 14% 15
6% 3 —2% db.
50 1654 1754
1$ 13 —l4
954 3% 3 Ale.
10 265( 26%

- -- ••
39 -30

15 I —23dls,

[834 I - -..

•• ... ••

10 1.. —..
IN I 8% --7% die,

17
I
6 4 d.

10 4%-- 6-
10 16% - 16

19%3

• • ..... ..
24 -26

[7% -
ip 8 -

u I • • -- • •
10 120 -21
10 • •

• • •••• ..

44 -45

21 -Nu

4% —3% dis.

17 9
(16 %
176 die,
' 4% —4%

i 0 I 24 24%
10 1% 1 Cis.
'OBEIGN.

7% %

5 4% dia.
4 dia.
10% %

8% - 9

ion IN —16%
L 7 :t.

26% % N[32
30% 2% 1%

24% z.d

6 —4% die.
% —1% P.

--i
U - 54 IL
. - ..
Bg, 1 -11 i
10 2% -2%
•
25 .. -..

7%
14% 15
4% 4 did.
34 —,36
25% 25%
5 476 db.
10% 11
3 —3%
976 —9% dig.

8% I —1%
STOCK BANKS.
40 83 32%
50 424 43
25 9s— 10%
20 25 25!
ie 18% 17%
20 273{ 2739

21 % 34 %

10
2234 17% -1$
IS 42 -43
10 15% - IS
25 34% -36
2ji 3
io ii% —133(
10 ••

7% !if

14% % x.d

25% %