The Sun.
London, England, 1833-06-24 00:00:00

SCOTL AN D.

Adam, C.—Clackmannanshire
Agnew, Sir A.—Wiatonshire
Arbuthnot, Gen.—Kincardine-
shire
Bannerman, A.—Aberdeen
Colquhoun, J. C.—Dumbarton
shire
Dunlop, J.—Kilmarnock
Elliot, Hon. G.— Roxburghsh ire
Ewing, James—Glasgow
Ferguson, G.—Banffshire
Gordon, Call. W.—Aberdeen-
shire
Grant, C.—lnverness-shire
Hay, Sir J.—Peebles-shire
Hay, A. L.—Elgin, &c.
Jeffrey, Rt. Hon. F.—Edinburgh
Johnstone, J. J. H.—Dumfries-
shire
Johnston, A.—St. Andrews
Kennedy, T. F.—Ayr, &c.
Loch, J.—Wick, &c.
Mackenzie, J. A. S.—Ross-shire
Macleod, R.—Sutherlandshire
Maxwell, Sir J.—Paisley
Murray, J. A.—Leith
Ross, H.—Montrose, &c.

METROPOLITAN COU]
SURREY, SUSS:

DIVISION OF FIFTY-NINE MEMBERS

One was in the Chair of the Committee, 22 voted with
Ministers for striking out the 147th Clause of the Irish
Temporalities Bill, 15 for retaining it, and 23 were
absent, of whom one Paired for retaining the Cl Anse.

MAJORITY.

MIDDLESEX.
Byng, G.—County
Spankie, R.—Finsbury
Grant, Rt. Hon. R.—Finsbury
Key, Sir J.—London
Lyall, G.—London
Horne, Sir W.—Marylebone
LushingtonDr.--TowerHamlets
SURREY.
Mangles, J.—Guildford
Wall, C. B.—Guildford
SUSSEX.
Surrey, Earl—West County
Smith, J. A.—Chichester

Lennox, Lord A.—Chichester
Hurst, R. H.—Horsham
Spencer, Capt. F.—Midhurst

KENT.
Knatchbull, Sir E.—East Kent
Hodges, J. L.—West Kent
Rider, T.—West Kent
Mabelly, W. L.—Chatham
Reid, Sir J. R.—Dover
Halcomb, J.—Dover
Barnard, E. G.—Greenwich
Robarts, A. W.—Maidstone
Troubridge, Sir E.T.—Sandwich
MINORITY.
Hawes, B.—Lambeth
I Humphery, J.—Southwark:

MIDDLESEIC,
Hume, J.—County
Wood, Alderman—London
Grote, G.—London SUSSEX.
Clay, Curteis, H.—East Sussex
W.—Tower Hamlets
Evans, Col.—Westminster Faithful, G.—Brighton
SURREY. Wigney, I. N.—Brighton
Briscoe, J. I.—East Surrey
Beauclerk, W. A.—E Surrey
Leech, J.—West Surrey
Tennyson, C.—Lambeth

KENT.

Dundas, J. W.—Greenwich

PAIRED OFF.
Kemp, T. R.—Lewes

COURT CIRCULAR.

The Duchess of Gloucester and the Princess Sopisia visited
:heir Majesties on Saturday.

The King gave audiences on Saturday, at the Palace at
St. James's, to the Hanoverian Minister, Earl Grey, the Duke
of Roxburgh, the Earl of Albemarle, Sir James Kempt, and
Sir James Raynett.
The Queen, attended by the Marchioness of Ely, honoured
the Countess of Brownlow with her company on Saturday, at
the dejeune given by her Ladyship at her residence in Be!grave-
square. Prince George of Cambridge, accompanied by his
preceptor, the Rev. Mr. Wood, was of the party. About
five o'clock the Prince and his tutor left town for Windsor
Castle.

Their Majesties left town about five o'clock on Saturday
afternoon in a carriage and four, escorted by a party of Lancers,
for the Palace at Windsor.

The Duke of Cumberland honoured the Rev. Mr. Thurlow
with his company at dinner on Saturday evening, at his re-
sidence in Saville street. The Earl of Eldon, the Earl of
Falmouth, and Lord Kenyon, were among the party to meet
his Royal Highness.
The Duchess of Kent and the Princess Victoria, and their
Royal Highnesses' Household, attended Divine Service yes-
terday at the Palace at Kensington. The Rev. Mr. Pitman
officiated.

The Princes Alexander and Charles of Solms were present
at the review at Wormwood Scrubs on Saturday. In the even-
ing their Highnesses dined with the Marquis of Stafford in
Cleveland square, and afterwards went to Kew.
Mr. Burge, the Agent for Jamaica, accompanied by Messrs.
Barrett and Hodson (from Jamaica), had an interview with
Mr. Secretary Stanley, on Saturday, at the Colonial Office.
Viscount Althorp has been indisposed during the last few
days, but is recovering.
The Lords of his Majesty's Privy Council held a meeting on
Saturday, in the Council Chamber, which was attended by the
Master of the Rolls, Messrs. Pierrepoint, Taylor, and Ellice.
The Hon. William Bathurst was the Clerk of the Council in
Waiting. Two appeals were set down for hearing—Pownall
v. Mascall, from Antigua : and Douglas v. Smith ; and another
from St. Vincent's. In the latter case, which had been partly
heard at a former meeting, the Master of the Rolls, on the part
of their Lordships, stated their decision to be against the will
(not executed) as no sufficient evidence had been adduced to
prove that the deceased (Dr. Brown) had been prevented from
executing the deed between the time that it was dated and the
period of his decease. The will could not, either, be held good
for the personal estate, inasmuch as, by the terms of the deed,
the real property would be liable to be rendered an auxiliary
fund to the personal estate. The cause will, therefore, be sent
back to the Court below, viz., the Court of Ordinary at St.
Vincent's.