The Sun.
London, England, 1834-02-01 00:00:00

COURT OF CHACERY.-(THIS DAY.)

NEW FEES.—BROOKE V. TURNER.
Mr. PICOT applied for an order from his Lordship to
compel Master Trower to deliver out his report in thi.
cause, upon payment being made to Lim of the fees that
were due under the old system. The draft of the report
vl'e, made in August last. Several attendances took place
bt•fore the Master prior to the long vacation, but in conse-
guenee of the offices closing, it was postponed till after
the recess. The parties then p the Master's clerk the
„
-Btralfee of 61. on each folio for the copy. The report was
a" Settled till after the new orders came out, and the
Al tees
complaint now was that refusal was made in the
Alaster's office to deliver out the report, unless the fees
Were pail according to the new scale. Under the old
systemthey would be 81. 3s. 101., and under the new,
S:%d. The question arose upon the 37th section,
:ea of the 3.1 and 4th of the present King.
.'6! Loan CHANCELLOR could not make the order
Without consulting with their Honours the Master of the
Rolla and the Vice-Chancellor, which he would do as well
upon this as upon another question that had been sub-
etted to him a few days ago ; also upon the
re system of charging. It was imperative that
"Y order of this sort should be made by the Chan-
cellor, with the concurrence of at least one of their
timours. It was right, however, that suitors should
"le that both their Honours had entirely concurred in
every
one step that bad been taken, and in every thing
at had been done with respect to the new orders. None
of the Judges could, of course, be answerable :or any
tarttcular charge—professional gentleman had been con-
ad
upon them all, and it was only the ultimately finished
tih,
statet of the schedules that had been brought befo-e them
(the Judges), and of which they had expressed their un-
qualified approbation.

RE LORD WARD.
The LORD CHANCELLOR was for a considerable time
?ecuPied, in his private room, with Counsel and parties
le this matter.

APPEALS.
nil Lordship proceeded!, as appointed, to bear appeals

ICE CHANCERY COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

His Honour the VICE-CHANCELLOR sat at Lincoln's Inn,
and took rnotions to-day.
BEtinveT U. BROOK AND OTHERS.
E.
Sir MICIDEN.. With whom was Mr. HEATIIFIELD,
fenappdantlied s
from upon notice for an injunction to restrain the de-
Pr°ceeding with an action at law to recover
the amount of certain bills of exchang a given by a person
of the name of Molyneux, who was a partner with the
plaintiff for a debt due from ahlyneux to them.
The short facts of the ease
appeared to be these :—ln
the year 1832 the plaintiff entered into partnership with
Molyneaux as tea dealers in Mincing-lane. Previous to that
partnership Molyneaux was indebted to the defen-
dants, who are tea-brokers residing in the city, to a large
amount, and upon his represen'ing to the plaintiff that he
required money to carry on his business as a tea-dealer,
he consented to enter into partnership with him if he
Was satisfied of his credit and integrity. For the pur-
Pose of satisfying the plaintiff on this point, Moly neux
referred him to Messrs. Brooks, the defendants, who
Spoke so highly of Molyneaux, that the plaintiff was
Induced to enter into a partnership with him. At the
time of the interview with Messrs. Brooks, however, it
Was alleged by the plaintiff that these gentlemen never in-
timated to him that the defendant was indebted to them,
tad the plaintiff discovering after the partnership began that
Molyneaux was drawing bills in the partnership name,
and handing them over to the defendant, for the payment
of the debts previously due from him, the plaintiff filed
Lis bill, praying for the dissolution o
f the partnership, and
ft,4 injunction in the meantime,
restraining
from negotiating the bills which were the defendants
n then due. In
August last the injunction was applied for, and obtained ex
Parte, but the hill not praying for an injunction to re-
strain the defendants from proceeding at w, they brought
in action to recover the amount of the bills which were
11"? over due, to restrain the proceedings in which a
suPplemental bill had been filed, anti the present applica-
tion made.
Mr. GlanLEsTortn, jun., in the absence of the ktorney-
General, opposed the application on the ground of the
statements in the defendants' answer, from which it ap-
Peared that the defendants had fully apprised the plaintiff
that Molyneaux was indebted to them previous to the
partnership With him,
His HONOUR granted the injunction.