The Sun.
London, England, 1805-04-30 00:00:00

atTe/sary. Rig Hon. Viand had' nut stated that
coy nt,rsfin wAs ihqiiry, as indeed inilivi:.
wss, or ought to oe above inquiry in this
Cmrory, but ::.oat. the Whie Litd will beyond the
te4elt .f by any inquiry. the letter of the
fi n. Baronet Coils ,riot kvotiii notice till the other
documents should :be had. In moving for .Papers,
the lion. Boronet ought oat least to have given a
At....',lptiort ref the documents he called for. The
Rom, he thought. had .gat by the omission into a
difficult state 4:41. proceeding.
VICKii.VS2N stated, in a few words,
that the "Motion which had, been made, (by Mr:
Klnnsitri) fur the ,produlion of the• letter of Mc.
Tucker to. the Mmiralty was precisely the same-as
that then nutlet by the Hon. Baronet.
Mr. G. PPNSONOY shpuld.not vote. for read
ing the Papers. It was not lair to the,Noble Lord.
rite Papers: were inten4eil not only as a justification
of the lion.. Baronet, but a new, frerdt, distind, mat.
to of crimination against the Noble... Lord, and„,in
candour he was entitled to on c!xliitv,,iol,.ol The
°hied, and of the documents. This he was entitled
to claim frnas the justice of Parliament, leaving its
generosity out :.f the. question, or without resting
on his ,ch.rader end service,, or on chile feelings
towards him which pervaded every part of the coin.

munity.
ArTORIVEY.GENER AL. •obsetvctl, 'that
if any other person but Lord St. Vincent were the
ohjett of the Motion, nu ohjetlion.would be made
to laying the Documenteon the Table. But Wei
there opt a Report on the Table charging the Hon.
Barr. with haying. omitted to have iitifornied the
First Lord ,of she Admiralty of certain important
tranitatitorts He had looked into the intr6dudory
Weer-linos the comencement of the discussion, by
which it aptecared that the Hon. Bulnet; when he
Inond that hie conduct had been reflected on by the
SII4O Report, had tendered to, be re.examined ; which
the Commissionete had, no doubt, on sufficient
grounds, refused. The Hone Batt, had then addressed
himself to the Admiralty, inclosing the. documents.
Inconiseqtience of which they were no longer in
his
potter:44in, and that had been the cause' of his moving
for the Letter and its Incitsures..At to the observe.
.soon. of the:Learned,Gentleman that this was a fresh
and distinti charge agaiost , the Noble_ Lord, Was not
there already upon tho,.Table a charge against.. the
}ion. Baronet Ways'ihere.na hardship .in that
A Learned Srejeant ,(Best) had given notice of .a
Motion on the subject of- the Eleventh Report ;
Sod in adverting to the change tif..Notioea. that had
itaken.place, his Right Honnurable Friend had only
laid, that it_ was impossible for the llotite to know,
*hither the. Motion would be made Or a Commit.
tee of not.
Mr..GNEY felt it iivpossible to suffer the House
to bc..lied away by false impressions. He was sure
the statement from the other eide was not carted
relative to the order of the Makin* (on Thursday).
HOW himself stiggensted to move.' for the Cont.
mittee fires and for the, Ptosecution after. 'But he
observed:ln uniform endeavour to mislead the House ;
that they who supported him opposed the produltion
of Ducurnents,—God forbid it was to the manner
of moving for the Documents they olije&d. He
' moo happy to,firiti that • no Gentleman attempted to
Pratify the manner in which the Hon. Baronet had
IPlight ,fortv ard.his M ition. The Report had been
printed on the r tth March, and it Was not till the
yid of April !,hat the Hun. Baronet wrote the let.
ter to the, Admiralty ; Whale ;sth he gave his no.
tree, and an the,a6ili he moved tot its produltion.—
What was to ke_concluded, but that hei.had written
the letter for the porpose,of having it, produced to
ferliament if
Sir ANDREWS. h'AMOND had lost no time.
It was extremely late in March .when the • Report
had beers printed, anti the next, day he wrote to the
o,ostrtirsionere of
_lnquiry. As he held a high
office, it was nip slight matter that lie should stand
,eight with his lultarior,Board. He had written his
letter on the tilt of April, and delivered it with his
own hand to the Commissioners. On the 17th he
received iheinswer, and on the 2ad he wrote to the
Admiralty. 'she documents were in the regular form
of dicoments from one 101rei to another, and num.
leered Irvin t to to, being letters from the 'Secretary
,of State, anti ,from Earl St. Vincent, and if the
Secretery of the Admiralty did not produce them
with the proper titles, it was not his fault. ihe
eisedips the Papers would not take tip ten minutes,
e should therefore vote for the Motion.
M r. 41C aN,./4.11V D should nut have risen if it had
root been ha a personsl allusion to hire. Previous
go she Motion which had been observed upon, he
)lad,prettentetia Petition front Mr. Tucker, explain.
Sig the nature of his grievances anal the Motion.
The Letters 'vat then read. The first explain.
ed the circumstances, of the Hop, Baronet's situation
nil coltilutt, and his application to the Commis.
clusters of Naval [Aug. The enclosures were Let.
sers from Lord Hobart, Mr.,Sullivan, and the Earl
01 of. y tticent. No, 3, the principal one, from Earl
st. Vincent to Sir A. S. }femoral, mentions the re.
ceipt of his cootrounieetion respelling the Stone Ex.
redition, which he has no doubt will he well caeca,.
ed; hut as the wholeexpenee was to be defrayed by
the Treasury, he
_saw no ()cession fur giving any of
the iletaits to the Admiralty.
On the Papers being read,
Mr. TIERNEY said, that the Hoare was aware
that for
,some time back the mast base, malignant
isisinaationa, were circulated that Laid St. Vincent
had been guilty of the must grosi perjury. Every
Member of the Houle, particularly the friends of
the Noble Lord, mutt have been deeply stetted by
such a charge, It was not surprising that those
who had been themselves eonvitied of delinquen.
try, should wish to bring him, the author of that
detection, to their own level: Every exalted
charatter, when he undertakes to reform abuses,
must expeil to be subject to such charges. He had
beard, if le coedit regularly advert to the (-intim.
stance, that the Noble Lord had never either di.
redly or italiratly countenanced the application of
• the naval !stoney to other services. He defied the
Honourable Baronet to prove that the Noble Lord
unit' tmly and sedui,,usly protested against
~Jch application of the naval money to svcret ser.
tr era. N 440 OiECer was to have boa) etriplOyed
tile Sitikine, ut the vet eta; the wtwi lc was to have
'vett Cothitae,te.i by those belier acquaitited with
the klatch Coast. The ohjtot of the Commissionets