The Sun.
London, England, 1851-06-24 00:00:00

(LEFT SPEAKING.)

HOUSE OF COMMONS.
The SPEaticka took thy Chair shortly after Twelve
o'clock,

PRIVATE BUSINESS.
The St. Helee's Impruvemeet Bill was read a third
time and pessed.
Mr. MO NATr moved that tRe standing orders be
dispensed with in the ciao) of the Metropolitan Water
Supply (control of by Representative Body) Bill be dis-
pensed with a view to reading the Bill a second time.
Mr. WILSON PATTEN opposed the motion, and
said that if it were carried the House might as well dis-
pense altoge her with the Standing Older.' Committee,
for it would be sanctioning a most flagrant breach of the
rules which it had laid down for the introduction ot
private Bills.
Mr. HUME supported the motion. If any relaxation
of the standing orders was sought it was fur the public
advantage.
Mr. WILLIAMS also supported the motion. He ap-
pesied to the Right Hun. Baronet the Home Secretary '
not to take advantage of such small technicalities ta
detest a 80l which be had promised should be referred
to a Select Committee.
Sir G. GREY could not respond to the appeal just
made to him, bn cause it was quite impossible fur him, as
a member of the Government, to interfere with the func-
tions of the Standing Oiders Committee.
After a ,ew, words from Sir B. Hall, Mr. Mowatt, and
Mr. W. Patten,
The motien was withdrawn.
PREVEN l lON OF OFFENCES BILL.
This Bill aas reed a third time and pa.:s.d.
SMI t HFIELD MARKET REMOVAL BILL.
On the motion ttr the third reading,
:dr. STAFFORD protest• d agaiest the Bill, but inti •
mated that it was not his intention to divide the House
cn the motion tier the third reariieg. He hoped the Bill
would meet with a different tate in another place.
Mr. HUME thought the House had proceeded in a
rash and inconsiderate manner, in sign eing to this Bill,
which in his opinion seigmattz,d aid di,el',.e'd the first
municipal c,rporation in the country. He moved that
the Bit be reed a third [me this day six months.
Mr. W. WILLIAMS reef) to secend the amendment,
believing th,t his constituents would be very sertuusly
injured by this Hill.
Sir G. GREY defended the Bill, and called upon the
Ileuse to adhere to his form r decisions on this Bill,
sod read it a ttiird time. There was au desire to exc'ude
the city of London from the management of the new
market; hut on contrary, h. yet entertained hives
that eventually the Corporation would be induced to un •
dertake ice; • n.i-e c• ntrol
Sir JAMES DUKE repeated that the City was dis-
pelled to make the exiseing market almost a tree marker,
besides considerably increasing its wee and improving its
de ails. and he there'ore could tart help feeling that there
was no riene•eity for this. He insi,teri that .he Govern.
some id. a ot the nutuber
merit ought to give the Hoes-.
• of acres iliac would be reqiiire.d for the te'w market it
they were not prepared 0, name win re its site we uld be.
Again, he protested egotist the Bill, and trusted is
would be thiown ut elsewhere.
Mr. CARDWELL supported the all. He denied
that the Select C cocuittee who ci,nsidered the
mutter had not done ample justice to the Ciey.
They gave the Corpora ion a fair hearing, and
he venrured to assert that when the public. came
to loelc fairly at the question they would agree that the
Committee earl arrived a' a just cenclu...ion.
Sir 11. VERNEY contented that Saiiti,fi,..ld was
great nuisance, and its removal ass imperatively de.
banded by the wants and wishes of the public.
Sir W. JOLLIFFE thought irwas for the advantage cf
the public that the market should b.- in the centre of the
metropolis, rather than five miles to the north. It was
not strictly correct to say that the city of London was
fairly treated either by the Bill or the Government.
because now could they - undertake the management of
a market which they knew nothing ot?
Then House then divided, when these app eared—
Foe the third reading ;.. 81
Against it
Majority 32
The Bill was t''en read third •
BUILDING ACTS"
• AMENDMENTtirnean
BlLL.dssed.
CHURCH
tor •h-, second reading of this Bill,
Hkt.:(l what the object ot the measure was.
Oa the motion
Mr. HUME
Bill proposed to facilitate the
Sir G. GREY
said the
a. •
erection of churches in populous districts, arid make ro-
vision for their endowment by the vale of pew teem')
Mr. HUME complained that there was one clause in
the Bill arnich would heve thee ffsct of preveutteg parties
from building chuichea utile SS Ihey elleetd the birth
of the chmemo to ni,minate the clew man. Th. aitait:pp
of London and others ef bis Clll6B made tt great
noise about the spiritual destitution of Poo.
d Bills or cular districts, and yet they promeie this
• deseription, which were little better than a robbery on
. the public and the poor. It would have the effect of
taking sway one•ball of the free seats in all churches
that have been built by volun ary contribution.
Sir GEORGE GREY said tee should have tao objec-
tion..to take than clause cur.
that would not
HUME eitteglad f •
remee, h,_ o it, but even
• to be „VJecti.ll to the Bill; and it appeared to him
consi-
deration otesure that ought to be referred to the corisi-
in defilialSceelect Cernmittee. This mode of legisla-
tion.of the wishes and wants of the poor,
would before 10
Wished Crut this
fdlug lead to the destruction of the Este-
second time this day he eheuld propose that it be read a
Sir R. HALL saidx months.the soh-division of porn,: clause in the Bill for
one, hut the Bill went coned," perishes was a grmi
ntlise shhuld pause fat foe, beyond that, and the
This we not the first
oceugua lead it a sec.d time.
nature had been Introduced; for which a Bill ibis
similar Bill was brought in, whichformer session is
lwould have bad the
effect, had it paaf.el, of considerably
rates, and this But was like that, the &11 of church
of London. Its real obipct was to tax the free,
the Bishop
e ree leash of
existing churches. His Hoe. Filend the
Montrose hadstated Member fur
ire y that no private iedividu I
allowed to build a church without endowing it, and WI"
cone•equeuce area, as had ually occurred an a district 9"
with which he was co,nected, that
_urge portions ot the
population west entirely without church accottreoee„
then. It was not the doctrine hut the discipline of our
Church that required reformation, and before the
house
entrusted greater powers io Right R•• verend Pre-
lates they (eight to kidst upon reformieg their discipline
Mr. PLUMP FRE said- '•
the two precerding speakers
bad taken a very erroneous view of the Bell, though he
was notpreparedto
were
highlyCe.mite'bjectionabie, but theae, could be removed in
and the Bill made a very usefulone.
Mr- W. J. FOX this • Bill had be en brought for-
ward at a time When it riga ut
Sider it fairly„itheterl impossible to (Ju-
r in or out ot ouors, and he con • tended that it was only an act of justice that the second
=ending should be postponed to some- future occasion.

BANKRUPTS.
Anthony Patten, burial dealer, Cnapp'e Es,rx, to su r
v,licler Juiy 12, at one, and July 29, at twelve the
Court of Bankreptey. Graham, theist assigu'eea: Ed.
teary, Fenchuich-street.
Joseph Sowerby, silkmercer, Oxford-street. July 10
and Augur. 12, a• eleven, at tte Court of Bankriptcy.
G, own. ffi tai assignee, Abehurch-lane; Wootton': Vo.-
kenhouse-) ard.
Wilburn Hanson, sta'uiry, Warwick-road, S-nsing-
ton, Jul) 3. at 'en, and Aua. 5 at eleven, at the Court
ut Bafikrurcy. Groom, Oficial assignee, Auchurch-
lane; Laogrove, Mark•lace.
John Benton, corn merchant, White Horse-street,
Stepney, July 4, at halt past one, and Aug. 15. at
.weave, at the Court of Bankruptcy, Edward,,, tfficlal
assignee, Sam brouk- cour., Basing f all-street ; Hilieary s,
Fenchurch street.
William Davies, coal merchant, Wslbrook, July 3 and
Aug. 7, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Johnson,
official assignee, Basinghall-atreet ; Gresham, Castle-
street, Holb rn.
Augustus B, zzi Granville, boarding and lodging-house
keeper, Wembly, Middlesex. June 28. at two, and Aug.
23, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Penvell,
official assignee, Guildfall-chambers, B isin;.:,hall-street;
Lawrence end Plews, (lid Jewry -chatuhers.
Thomas George Tui, y, bookseller, Rugby, Wurwick-
shire, Jul) 3 and 31, at tw,lve, at the Birmingham Dis-
trict Court. Christie, official assignee, Birmingham;
Wratislaw, Rugby.
Will William SOLVENT DEBTORS.
iaHeath Bonds, builder, Creek-load, Deptford.
Fr: Leis Ptiiim-r Parker, clerk in the Mental Life As-
Joh'Trla7raice, Windsor-terrace, Vauxhall-road.
New Braead.gg, vain° merchant, Belgiave-street,
Jonathan
i„o_fiei„Etrris, milkman, Great Wild-street, Lincoln's
Frederick
hill. Sparrow, tea merchant, Skinner-street, Snow-
jr;hrielrlein.veterinary surgeon, Church-place,
James Fisher. confectionPZl‘S,lorahe7street, Chelsea.
Abraham E. Dais. ,„
.Meet,
Alogtte.
Nathaniel Jones Woolley"Zigh• M
Ann Reynold,,, 1,,dging.h05,,, Camden-town.
Pcer, Greene-street,
lizvhbon&-plice.
Alexander Reid, commission agent, Tachbrook-street,
Plmi co.
Edward Cowell, agent Ibr Ibe We of b,..oks, Cam.
bridge.
Fred. rick Gilbert, grccer, acehix-place, Phcesix-street,
Spitaltields.
Anthony Carroll, furniture dealer, East-street, Finsbury.
market.
Thome,. Rattray, ironmonger, Vc,df Tr" place, Stepney.
Colin M•CtAiihro, ship br, k, r, Sciney-t.qu .1 e, Mile et,d.
E. Kl4aictr, hawk, r, 16 ellingion street, Blacktriars road
J• Batt, surgsou, Terrace, Trinity -,quure.
Well am Wllls, jun., Shouloham-street, Elgeware• road.
c•-al deader, Riding House-lane, Mar) lebune.
James
aoustoun Biexani, ch rk, Mitcham Common, Surrey.
Bel ry Bennett, licensed victualler, bultord LAncasbirc.
Crockwell, commission agent, Sait.rci.
G,orci3 fiarrintc,n Church, sui geori, Gravesend.
Garner, baker, Great ALCOctitt-aurae, Nan-
T Ts?rilarrison, butcher, Lancashire.
dolly, o.he!d
ju sst n Hayes, beer-houselkeeper, Salford.
h" Jack, beerselier. Mat heate
r.
Janes 51111 d, team bailiff, Wes:ertou'S.Usse ltilph Robinson,- agent, Salford, Las.' cs Is x.
Upheld, grocer's assistant, West C'hiltinrgei
u kn, Sussex.