The Sun.
London, England, 1851-06-30 00:00:00

TILLLONS7.

The deliveries of Tallow hsve been somewhat exten-
sive during the past week for the time of year; hence
the market is tolerably film at very lull prices. To-day
P.Y.C. on the spot im quoted at 37s 9d; and for forward
delivery 38s 6d t., 38i. 9d per cwt. Town Tallow, 35s
6d per cwt net cash; rough f,t. 2s per 816.

1847.

Stock this day ••.. • • 8.422
Price of Y. C. ....
40
I t0480536dd
i
Delivery last week .. 532
Ditto from June 1.... 3,6 s f
Arrivals last week • 5"
Ditto from June 1 ... 3,990
Price of Town ...... 535 Od

1848.

1849.

1850.

PM.

4.,,418 23,115 23,971 I 36,527
445 6d 38s 3d 365 9d to, 37s 9d
to 4159,1 to 3556 d 56s tid to 05 Od
1,448 , 1,223 hO2 1,415
6,4.7 4,703 4,2,6 4,150
770 j 1,044 4 i 244
6,316 2,415 2,633 4,344
464 66 39a 6d 38s Od 368 Cd

THE GREAT EXHIBITION.
(THIS DAY )
The number of visitors who entered the building this
Morning was about 17,000, and from the crowds conti•
nuttily passing in every moment we have no doubt that
to-day's returns will be found as sais!actory as on any
previous day. A great want of efficient ventilation has
been felt during the last few days of intensely hot wea-
ther which we have experienced. If the Crystal Palace
is to be left standing—and no voice is now raised to
advocate its demolition—and more especially if it is to be
turned into a winter garden, it is hot too late now to
commence operations for ventilating and warming the
building, to accommodate its temperature to the various
seasons, and we are sure that such a measure, under-
taken and carried out speedily, would render a vit,it to
the Exhibition much more a matter of enjoyment than
it is when the visitor, as now, is obliged to make bis
promenade in au atmosphere not many degrees cooler
than a vapour bath.
The visitors to-day consisted for the most part of
excursionists, a great proportion of whom were evi-
dently present for the first time. The number of fo-
reigners too increase considerably; but we are informed
that at present the advanced guard of continental visi
tors has only as yet visited our shores, and that the
main body will scarcely arrive here before the end of the
ensuing month.

HOUSE OF LoRDS.—(THIS DAY.)

Their Lordships sat to-d4y to hear appeals. The
Peers present were tho Lerd Chaucelior and Lord
Brougham. No ca:e of public interest occurred this
morning.

ROLLS' COI RT.--(THIS DAY.)
(13efute the MASTER of the linu.s.)
Bis Honour this morning proceeded with the part-
beard case of Brown v. Oakshott.

VICE-CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY.)
BO°. e Vice-Cba t,cellor KNIGHT BRUCE.)
His El-nour was occupied this snowing with unop-
posed petitions.
(Before Vice-Chancellor Lord CRANWORTIL)
EGERTON v. EARL BR WNL W.
This was a demurrer respcctit.g the description of the
property of the late Earl of Bridgewater, who died
about 1830, leaving his estates to hits nearest heirs male,
Lord Alford and Mr. Cust, under certain 'conditions,
one of which was that all efforts !should be used to in-
duce the Crown to revive the title of Earl of Bridge-
water. The dell Rdauts are the Earl of Brownlow,
Mr. Cust, and Mr. Tattun Egerton, M.P. The plaintiff
is the son of the late L.,rd Altord.
Mr. Russell appeared for Mr. Cast, and was opening
the case when we went to press.
(Before Vice-Chancellor TURNER.)
BEADON v. KING.
This part-heard case was again proceeded with.

QUEEN'S BENCH.—(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings at Nisi Prius iu GuilnhuL, before the LORD
CHIEF JUSTICE
BARTLETT, CLERK., V. EVANS.

This was an sutiOu of debt, brought to recover 1582.
for money had and received to the use or the plaintiff.
Mr. Prentice appeared for the plain tiff; and Mr. Keat-
ing for the defendant.
Mr. PRENTICE, in opening the case to the Court,
stated that a ate time ago the plaintiff, who was a bene-
ficed clergyman, was convicted of a libel, and sentenced
to two yearn' imprisonment. While he was undergoing
that punishment he was cited before die Bishop of his
diocese, to show cause why he did not attend at his
duties as incumbent of the district church of Ivington,
in the parish of Leominster, and as he was not in a posi-
tion to comply with that citation, the 13 ishop issued a writ
of sequestration, appointirg the defendant sequestrator,
in which capacity he received the moneey now sought to be
recovered. Now, there v ere three points of objections
which the plaintiff wished to raise against the se queara-
tion of the Bishop of Hereford; fl;si ty, that iutismuch
-
as the plaintiff was prevented from peg terming his duties
by a competent legal tribunal, it cou! d not be said that
he had contumaciowly disobeyed the citation, and there-
fore the Bishop had no power to resort to a sequestration;
secondly, the great principle of law, t v hich laid it down
that no man should be deprived of his !right or property
until he had been called upon to sho w cause, and hsd
actually had an opportunity of show ing cause against
such a proceeding; and, thirdly, that there was no resi-
dence upon the plaintiff 's bene lice to ego able him to com-
ply with the citation in the first instanJce. Those were
the points of law involved in the case, and on behalf of
the plaintiff, be seas desirous it should be taken pro
forma for the plaintiff, suoject to a estee for the opinion
of the Court above, to be rounded upc en a bill of excep-
tions, which the other side should have• the advantage of
rewiring.
M . KEATING declined to accede to 'the proposal, in-
fOrieleg the Court that the points raise !el by his Learned
Friend had already been discussed in t h e court above, on
an application for a writ of prohibi coo to be issue..d
against the sequestration, and dec lied against the
plaintiff.
Mr. PRENTICE, under these circumtit ances, had no al-
ternative but to proceed with the case.
Evidence was then put in to prove ',teat the defendant
was duly licensed, and inducted into h it; living in Here-
fordshire; but one of the witnesses a rated that the Ec-
clesiastical Commissioners had received the fruits of the
banefice and paid them over to the do fondant as sequea-
trator; and
The COURT held that there was no ease to go to the
jury. There was nothing to show tbatt a sequestration
bad not taken place, and it must, then arore, be presumed
that the defendant had properly received the money.
Mr. PRENTICE contended that he had made out the
plaintiff's claim to the living, and that was enough.
His Lordship would observe that if the sequestration
were allowed to continue the plain tiff would have to
suffer the loss of his living as well as the two ye..rs'
prisonment which was being inflicted upon him for the
libel.
_ . . .

Lord CAMPBELL said it did not foil ow that the seques-
tration d..prive,i the plaintiff of his li.nng.
Mr. PRENTICE sum in thin case it would, for as the
plaintiff's tom of imprisonment would not expire for
some eighteen months he could not r etake possession of
the living within a year after the issu itig of the seques-
tration, and he would therefore be wt 'oily deprived 0. it.
Lord CAMPBELL repeated bis (pit, ion that thero wo,s
no case to go to the jury, and the pl. Lima was accord-
ingly nonsuited.

MARLBRO'-STREE r-(THIS DAY.)

EXTRAORDINARY ROBBERY AT THE LON-
DON AND WESTMINSTE lit BANK, ST.
JAMES'S-SQUARE.

John Tyler, aged 62, a returned transport, and William
Cauty, 69, were brought before Air. EardwiekP, in cus-
tody of Inspector Lund and Sergeant Whither, of the
Detective Police, charged with having committed a
most daring robbery, at the branch establishment of the
London and Westminster Bank, St. J.imes's-square.
The prisoner Tyler refused to give his address, and
the other prisoner, Cauty, described ,himself as a "gen-
tleman," residing at. 55, Commercial-.road, Lambeth.

Mr. L-wise, solicitor, of Ely place, ratended to conduct
the prosecution on the part the London and West-
minster Bank. There were also pr. sent seei•ral lune-
the bank. solicitor named
tionartes connected with
Vicers, as we understood, defended Clauty. The other
prisoner was unprovided with legal ar;
Canty wail dressed in a suit or black, and had a rather
respectable appearance. Tyler was shabbily attired,
and looked like ara chanic ut of emp I,oy.
Mr. Lewis having bri• fly recapii 'listed the facts of
the case, celled the iollowing witoes tes

Itt.pictor Lund, or the &tectitto said—On
Saturday, the 31. t of May last, I wts near Trafaig tr-
square. I obzervecl the prisoner Tyiler. I was accom-
panied by Sergeant Whicher. Ha ;and a great cotton
his left arm. !Vliiehcr knew him, :tied zn consequence,
of what ho communicated to me, I watched the
prisoner for that time. He went into St. Jamv-s's-park
and sat down on one of the seats near •the cows, opposite
the Duke of York's Monument. lie was immethattily
joined by Canty, who bite b,- the hac;(l.
both sat down tor twenty minut,s, used then writ to t::e
London 0"1 Wetiorain.ter I.Lek, in Ci,arlo,i•streer, Sr..
J4mes's-i-quare. Catry ervered an r tai .ined itolde for
ten or twelve minuteiv. The other •AnastAier reanAined
at the opposite corner. This Al as about twenty
minutes pad three. At the lapse of -the twelve minutes