The Sun.
London, England, 1851-08-02 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, SATURDAY EVENING, AUGUST 2, 1851

and following Saturday, between ten and three, at the
office of Jr. Wakley, Newcastle upon-Tyne.
NOTICES OF CERTIFICATES.
At the Court, Basingball-street.
C. Holthouse, Great Tower-street, sugar broker and
wine merchant, Aug. 22, at eleven.
In the Country.
R. Craig, Brynmawr, Brecknockshire, draper and tea
dealer, Sept. 1, at eleven, at the Court, Bristol—W.Gar-
row, Bootle, near Liverpool, merchant and shipowner,
Aug. 25, at eleven, at the Court, Liverpool—S. Pearse,
Topsham, Devonshire, coal merchant, Aug. 26, at eleven,
at the Court, Exeter.
CERTIFICATES GRANTED.
C. Chaplin, Sudbury, Suffolk, printer and bookseller,
certificate of the first class—H. Watson and J. G. Hick,
Elizabeth-bridge wharf, Pimlico, and Sittingbourne,
Kent, cement manufaoturers, certificates of the second
class—W. Coles, Milton-next-Gravesend, pastrycook
and confectioner, certificate of the second class—J.Clark,
Clarence-place, Camberwell, auctioneer, certificate of the
second class—R. Rising, Frith-street, Soho, and Lower
Berkeley-street, dealer in casts and bookseller, certificate
of the second class—J. Moores, jun., Aylesbury, Buck-
inghamshire, draper, certificate of the third class—T.
K. Pyrke, High-street, Notting-hill, bookseller, certifi-
cate of the third class—J. M'Namee, Manchester, manu-
facturing chemist, certificate of the second class.
PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED.
R. Lloyd, W. Kimberley, and 0. Lloyd, Birmingham,
wine and spirit merchants—W. Kimberley, 0. Lloyd,
and R. Lloyd, Birmingham, commission agents—J.
Ames and T. Harris, Bristol, malt distillers—T. Leo
and W. Glynn, Manchester, letterpress printers—C.
Cooper, sen., C. Cooper, jun., J. Cooper, and H. Cooper,
Maidenhead, Berkshire, brewers (so far as regards C.
Cooper, jun.)--C. Neal and J. Hawkins, Birmingham,
wire-workers and weavers—K. Hoyle and D. Allenby,
Louth, Lincolnshire, fellmongers—J. Radcliffe and J.
Radcliffe, Sowerby-brige, Yorkshire, woollen spinners
and coal merchants—H. Mehrtens and C. Roltens,
Spitalfields, scum boilers—J. Rix and J. B. Balcombe,
Royal Exchange, stock and sharebrokers—T. Collins, J.
C. Harrison, and H. Harrison, Manchester, calico
printers, merchants, and warehousemen (as far as re-
gards T. Collins)—H. Plumb° and S. Massey, Liverpool,
Berlin and fancy wool dealers—G. Standerwick and
w. a Williams, Bristol, auctioneers—J. Wood ear and
NV. Pritchard, Manchester, excavators—J. Crook and J.
Ismay, Ha Idax, Yorkshire, brickmakers—J. Wilson and
J. T. Wilson, Stamford, Lincolnshire, jewellers—J.
Hall and J. J. W. Gutch, King William-street, City,
and Gloucester, pin and needle manufacturers.
INSOLVENT PETITIONERS.
Thomas Tobin, Cardiff, tailor.

John Thomas, Aberdare, Glamorganshire, butcher.
John Morgan, Welsh St. Donnatts, Glamorganshire,
labourer.
George Miller, Brecknock, eating house deeper.
John Spring, Brigg, Lincolnshire, town crier.
James Cook Bygot Sutton, Broughton, Lincolnshire,
farmer.
Ann Nutt, Lutterworth, Leicestershire,.batcher.
Francis Goddard, Brimpton, Berks.
William Coates, Farnborough, Southamption.

George Lovegrove, Oxford, common room man.
Caleb Baskett, Bramford, Suffolk, cattle dealer.
William Simmonds, Tonbridge Wells, cabinetmaker.
Richard Earl, Reigate, Surrey.
Thomas Smith Williams, Ramsgate, gentleman.
William Allen, North Nibley, Gloucestershire.
Charles James Fox, Uley, Gloucestershire, carpenter.
James Stokes, St. Philip and Jacob, grocer.
SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS.
J. M'Graw, Gorebridge, merchant, to meet within
Stevenson's Rooms, Edinburgh, Aug. 11, and Sept 1, at
twelve.
H. Fergus, Edinburgh, earthenware manufacture, to
meet within the rooms of J. and A. Dowell, Edinburgh,
Aug. 8 and 29, at one.
J. Brown, Aberdeen, woollen draper, to meet within
the Advocates' Hall, Aberdeen, Aug. 6 and 27, at two.
J. White, Airdrie, tailor, to meet within the Globe
Hotel, Glasgow, Aug 8 and 29, at one.
J. M'Cowan, Ayr, cattle dealer, to meet within the
Dumfries Arms Inn, Cumnock, Aug. 4 and 30, at three.
W. Craig, Newmilns, baker, to meet within the
George Hotel, Kilmarnock, Aug. 6 and 30, at half-
past ten.
J. Harvey, Glasgow, merchant, to meet within the
St. Enoch Tavern, Glasgow, Aug. 6 and Sept. 4, at one.

and there aro sellers at 298 to 29s 6d. In Nitrate of
Soda little has been done, and there are scller:', at 14s.
OILS.—At auction this afternoon 39 tuns Sperm mostly
sold at 851 to 861 si, one lot 84/; the bulk at 851 to 86/;
38 tuns Southern sold, double compass 321 15a to 331,
single 32/ 15a, and nic 32/ 108.
TALLOW.—This afternoon the Tallow market was
firm; at public sale 148 pps 14 hhda 202 bss South
American at 37s 8d for fine; 638 eks Australian—Mut-
ton 37s 6d to 37s 9d; Beef, second 36a 6d to 36s 9d.
P. Y. C. at 37s 9d to 38s on the spot, and in good
demand.

BANK OF ENGLAND.
(From last night's Gazette.)
An Account, pursuant to the Act 7th and Bth of Victoria,cap. 32 for
the Week ending on Saturday, the 26th day of July, 1851.
188IIS DSPARTMENT.
X.
Notes issued.• ...... 27,225,485

Government debt •• 11,015,100
Other securities .... 2,984,900
Gold coin andbullion 13,192,110
Silver bullion • • • • •• 33,375

427,225,485

X 27,225,485
, Chief Cashier.

Dated the 31st day of July, 1851
BANKING D 1

Proprietors 'capital • • 14,553,000
Rest • -• • 3,223,598
Public deposits (in-
cluding Exchequer,
Commissioners of
National Debt, Say-
ings-banks, and Di-
.

Government securi-
ties (including Dead
Weight Annuity) .. 13,464,021
Other securities .. .. 11,600,605
Notes ........ 6,7 C 9,445
Gold and silver coin.. 591,251

vidend accounts).. 4,295,495
Other deposits •• • . 9,097,562
Seven day and other

Bills •••• .... 1,195,667

£32,365,322

32,365,322
MARSHALL, Chief Cashier.

Dated the 31st day of July, 185

SEABORNE MAILS.
[N signifies that the mails are sent front the General Post-ofile.
by the night—and M by the morning—dispatch.]

When made up in From what When
PLACES. General Post-office port dis- dne.
ILondon: patched.
America (by Brit. pkt.)N Aug. .. Liverpool .. Aug. 4
America (by U.S. pkt.) N Aug. 5 .. .. Liverpool .. Aug. 12
America (by U.S. pkt.) M Aug. 13 .. Southampt. Aug. 7
Africa (West coast)•. N 14th of the month Plymouth Aug. 3
Alexandria* ........ N 19th & 30th of mo. Dover .. Aug. 15
Belgium • . N Daily .• .. Dover .. Daily
Brazil .. 11 9th of the month Southampt. Aug. 12
Buenos Ayres • • .. M 9th of the month Southampt. Aug. 12
California(viaChagrea)M 2d& 17th of month Southampt. Aug. 5
Cape of Good Hope N 14th of month !Plymouth • • Aug. 3
Constantinople* .... N,7th 17th 27th of molDover .. Aug. 10
Central America .. ,M2d & 17th of naon. I Southampt. Aug. 5
Channel Isles N'Mon., Wed., &Fri. Southampt. Tn. Tk.B a
Chili . 31,17 th of the month Southampt. Aug 5
France M&N Twice daily .. .. Dover .. Twicodaily
Greece* • • .. Nlth 17th27thef mo Dover .. Aug. 10
Hamburgh N,Tuesday & Friday London .. Tues. Sat.
Holland .. .. .. M)Vednes. & gatur. London .. Me/4.Thu
Honduras Nll7th of the mouth Southampt. Aug. 5
Ireland .. .. M & N,Twice daily .. .. Holyhead .. Twicedally
India (via Southamp.) M.2oth of the month Southampt. Aug. 23
India (via Marseilles) N,7th& 24th efmonth Dover • • Ati. 15
Mediterranean (via
Southampton) .. M2oth of the month Southampt. Aug. 23
Mediterranean (via
Marseilles) .. N 7th& 24th ofmonth Dover • • ,Aug. 15
Mexico .. 3e2d of the month.. Southampt. !Aug. 5
Madeira • • .. 1119th of the month Southampt. Aug. 12
Malta. ,7th,17th,19th,27th I Dover Aug. 10
& 30th of month
Naples* .. N sth 15th 25th of mo Dover .. Aug. 2
Papal States* .. N sth 15th 25th of mo Dover .. Aug. 2
Peninsular.. 7th 17th 27th of mo Southampt. Aug. 5
Peru .. M 17th of the month Southampt. Aug. 5
Tuscany* .. .• N sth 15th 25th of mo Dover • • Aug. 2
/Vest Indies .. M 17th of the month Southampt. Aug. 20
West Indies (except
Havanna & Nassau) M 2d of the month .. Southanapt.lAug. 5

The mails to those c
French packet v:4 Muse!.
CitiFOUNLA . Mails to
aro now despatched and d

12d of the month ..
ountries thus marl

and from California
Lao by every Ameri,

Southastpt. 1 Aug. 5
ted (4) are conveyed by

via tha United states
[can packet.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

HOUSE OF LORDS, August 1.
Their Lordships assembled at Five o'clock.
CUSTOMS BILL.

This Bill was read a second time on till motion 01
Earl GRANVILLE.
COMMISSIONERS OF RAILWAYS ACTS

REPEAL BILL.
Earl GRANVILLE moved the second reading of this
Bill.

Lord REDESDALE regretted the introduction 6
,hie Bill.

The motion was then agreed to, and the Bill was
read a second time.

LANDS CLAUSES (IRELAND) CONSOLIDA.

Unlawful Oaths (Ireland).
Tiviinike Roads (Irelfinti).
Private Lnnatic A,ylums (I elan'.),
Public Woiks (Ireland).
Local Acts (Preliminary Inquiries).
Charitable Institutions Notices.
Commons loclosure (No. 2).
Civil Bills, &c. (Ireland).
Ecclesiastical Titles As,unaption.
Militia Pay.
Soap Duties.
Copyhold and Enclosure Commissions.
Smithfield- market Removal.
Stock in Trade.
Imperial Continental Gas Association.
Kensington Improvement.
Hartlepool Pier and Port (Construction of New
Pier, &c.)
Wicklow Harbour.
Magneto-Electric Telegraph Company.
Clerkenwell Improvement (Transfer of Powers to the
Corporation of London, &c.)
Wexford Free Bridge.
Llynvi Valley, and Duffryn Llynvi, and Porthcawl
Railways.
Warkworth Harbour Dock Company.
Manchester Improvement.
Manchester, Buxton, Matlock, and Midlands Junction

Railway.
Thames Haven Dock and Railway.
Trinity College (Dublin).
Cameron's Coalbrook Steam Coal and Swansea and
Loughor Railway.
Manchester and Salford Extension Railway.
General Reversionary and Investment Company.
Glasgow Provident Bank E3tate.
Musselburgh (Arrangement with Creditors of the Burgh)

Estate.
Shelley's Estate.
Moore's Estate.
The Lords Commissioners were the LORD CHAN-
CELLOR, the Marquis of CLANRICARDE, and the Earl of
CARLISLE.
Several Bills were then brought sip by messengers
from the House of Commons.
A conversation then ensued as to a petition which the
Earl of ST. GERMANS had given notice of his intention
to present from the trustees of the Liskeard Turnpike
Roads, complaining of the exemption from tolls of stage
coaches carrying letters.
The Marquis of CLANRICARDE said that these
coaches were employed iu carrying across the country
letters brought by the railway, and that if the letters
were not sent by these coaches some delay would take
place in the delivery of them.
The Farmers' Estate Society (Ireland) Bill was read a
third time and passed.
On the motion of the LORD CHANCELLOR, the
Court of Chancery and Judicial Committee Bill was
read a third time and passed.
The Medical Charities (Ireland) Bill went through
Commii tee.
Adjourned till to-morrow (this day) at Twelve o'clock.

ROUSE OF COMMONS, August 1.
(Continued from our Afternoon Edition of yesterday.)
COUNTY COURTS FURTHER EXTENSION BILL.
The House then went into Committee on this Bill.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL moved the following
clause:—And whereas it is provided by the Act 9 and
10 Vic., c. 95, s. 40, that the greatest salaries to be re-
ceived in any case by the judges and clerks of the county
courts, shall be 1,2001. by a judge, and 6001. by a clerk,
be it enacted, that from and after the passing of this Act,
the greatest salaries to be received in any case by the
said judges and clerks respectively, shall be 1,500/. by a
judge, and 700/. by a clerk.
Mr. W. WILLIAMS opposed the clause, on the
ground that circumstances did not call for an increase in
the salary of county courts' judges.
Mr. COLLINS protested against the clause, but not
wishing to take any factious course et this late period of
the session, he would not divide the House.
Sir GEORGE PECHELL considered that a breach
of faith had been committed in placing additional bur-
dens on these officers. They had now more arduous
duties to perform than were contemplated by the first
County Courts Act, and ought, in his opinion, to have at
increased scale of remuneration. Even by the present
clause it was left uncertain whether the judges were to
have 1,0001. or 1,5001. a year.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said that it was in-
tended that the minimum salary should be 1,200/.
Mr. CLAY would like to see express words intro-
duced into the Bill fixing the minimum at that amount.
Sir G. STRICKLAND considered that as county
courts were every day growing into importance and use-
fulness, the respectability of the judges ought to be kept
up by giving them a salary, the amount of which would
be sufficient to secure eminent and experienced lawyers.
After some further discussion,
Mr. W. WILLIAMS said, as he saw the general
feeling of the House was in favour of the elause he
would not press any amendment.
The clause was then agreed to.
Mr. HARDCASTLE moved a clause, the object of
which was to provide a salary of 3001. to assistant-clerks,
instead of paying them by the present mode of remu-
neratiou. _ _ _

Lord D. STUART said the assistant-clerk, in many
cases, discharged all the real duties of tke first clerk, and
ought to receive a fair salary for his labour.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER opposed
the clause. _ _

After some discussion the clause was withdrawn.
The preamble was then agreed to, and the Chairman
was directed to report the Bill.
The House resumed, and the report was ordered to be
received to-morrow.
CHURCH BUILDING ACTS AMENDMENT BILL.

This Bill was considered and agreed to, and ordered
to be read a third time to•morrow.
MESSAGE FROM THE LORDS.

A messenger from the Lords brought up the following
Bills, which their Lordships had agreed to:—
Churches and Chapels (Ireland).
Ecclesiastical Residences (Ireland).
Charing cross Bridge.
Farmers' Estate Society (Ireland).
EPISCOPAL AND CAPITULAR ESTATES MA-

NAGE KENT (No. 2) BILL.
On the motion for going into Committee on this Bill,
Sir HENRY WILLOUGHBY objected to going on
with the Bill until the House was in possession of the
report and evidence upon which it was founded.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said the Bill was not

founded upon the report or the evidence to which the
Hon. Alember referred. The Bill was not compulsory,
as that report r,c,immended, but was merely permissive.
Sir H. WILLOUGHBY still entertained a strong ob-
jection to the Bill.
Colonel THOMPSON asked if the Bill would force

the parties to whom it referred to enter into certain con-
tracts whether they would or no?—(Cries of ".No, no.")
Well, then, would it merely give power to the parties to
make such contracts it they so thought fit?—(Yes, yes.)
Mr. AGLION BY urged upon the Government the
expediency of postponing the measure until next ses-
sion. He denied that it was a permissive Bill as it now
stood.
Sir B. HALL thought the lessees who would be
affected by the Bill ought to have time to consider it
before the House forwarded it another stage.—(Hear.)
A former Bill, which was admirable for its purpose,
and judicious in its provisions, was rejected by the other
branch of the Legislature after a long deliberation, but
this Bill was to be disposed of in a very different
manner. It was to be pressed forward with indecent
haste, end the parties who were most interested in its
provisions were to be refused the opportunity of
considering its details. Now if the Noble Lord
imagined that he could pass a Bill of this important
character within two days after it had come down from
the Lords, he must be labouring under a species of episco-
phobia that was perfectly astounding.—(A laugh.) He
protested against the House proceeding further
with this Bill, which might benefit one or two parties,
but would inflict great injustice upon the majority of the
ecclesiastical leaseholders of the country. He did
not object to the principle of the Bill, but to the hurried
manner in which Government were attempting to pass
it through, and he hoped the House would help him
to get it postponed until next session. With
the recent experience connected with the Church fresh
in the minds of the people, it was exceedingly impolitic
to proceed further with this Bill, which would exas-
perate the public mind, and render legislation upon the
subject next session impossible.—(Hear, hear.)
Lord J. RUSSELL said no pdlpable objection had
been or could be urged against the Bill. The Hon.
Baronet, according to his own statement, did not
object to the principle of the Bill, but merely to
some of its details. Well, then, why not
go into Committee and see if it was possible to improve
its provisions? There was nothing arbitrary in the Bill.
The lessees would be left to make their own bargain with
the ecclesiastical corporations, and it was quite impossible
that it could inflict injury upon either side. Then what
objection could there be to passing the even at this
late period of the session, if it contained nothing unfair
or unjust? No damage could accrue to any one from the
passing of the Bill, and as the objections ehich had been
urged by the Hon. Baronet could be removed in Com-
mittee he could not consent to postpone it until next
session.
Mr. HENLEY said the Noble Lord hat. entirely over-
looked the fact that the parties who were most interested
in this Bill had had no opportunity whatever of con.
sidering its provisions. That was the principle reason
nrged in favour of delay, and he for one thought the
reason was conclusive.—(Hear, hear.) The arrangements
to be made under this Bill were to be regulated by an ob-
jectionable Board, who might lay down rules
and establish principles which rendered the
Bill virtually inoperative; and when the lessees
themselves came to Parliament to legislate equit-
ably upon this subject, they would be met with the
objection that a permissive law was already in existence
which must have a fair trial before any further legis-
lation could take place. Now ho was anxious to
guard against such a state of things as that, and he
should support the Hon. Baronet opposite in obtaining
the postponement of this measure. More than half the
Members of the House had left town, and after the
pledge which had been given by Government on this
subject it would be a breach of faith to press this Bill
forward with indecent haste.
Mr. NE WDEGATE also objected to proceeding with
the Bill, as it would give the Ecclesiastical Commis-
sioners power to interfere with the rights of tenants, and
lessors the power to avoid all leases without compensat-
ing the lessees in the manner which the law and equity
of the land provided.
Mr. SPOONER, on the other hand, supported the Bill,
and contended that it was impossible that any injustice
could be done under its provisions, as before a lease
could be avoided the consent of the lessee as well as the
lessor must be first obtained for the purpose. He did
not, however, think that the Ecclesiastical Commis-
sioners were the proper parties to negotiate the avoid-
ance, but that was a matter of detail which could be
remedied in Committee.

Mr. J. A. SMITH thought that on the whole the
wisest and best thing !hey could do was to go into Com-
mittee on this Bill. It must nor be understood, however,
that in consenting to go into Committee he gave hi.; un-
qualified approval to the principle of the Bill, nor did he
disagree with those Honourable Members who looked
upon it as au unfortunate cirewinitance that a
Bill of this nature and importance should be
introduced at this late period of the session. Like other
Hon. Members who had preceded him, he protested

against the Ecclesiastical Commissioners having power
to form the rules and regulations upon which the provi-
sions of this Bill were to be put in force, and when they
got into Committee he hoped the clause giving them
that power would be struck out of the Bill altogether.
Lord D. STUART thought it a sufficient reason why
they should not proceed with this Bill, that the parties
most interested in its provisions had not yet had an op-
portunity of considering its provisions. and he should
therefore move the adjuurment of the debate.
Mr. ALCOCK said many of his consituents were
lessee under the Bishop of Winchester, and as they had
been afforded no opportunity of considering even the
principle of the Bill, let alone its details, he should vote
against going into Committee.
Mr. AGLIONBY, although somewhat opposed to the
Bill, would nevertheless vote for going into Committee
in the hope of being able to improve its provisions and
remove some of the objections which had been taken to
the clauses. For his own part he was quite content to
leave the interests of all parties in the hands of the pre-
sent Commissioners.
Mr. RICE expressed himself entirely of the same
opinion as the Hon. and Learned Gentleman who had
just sat down, that all matters were safe in the hands of
the Commissioners.
Mr. AIULLINGS was afraid that the interests of the
iesses9s were being overlooked. He was entirely favour-
able to :he principle of the present Bill, but he thought
alterations ought to be made in it to protect the rights of
the lessees.

After a few words from Lord J. RUSSELL,
The House divided, when there appeared—
For the adjournment
Against it .., ...
Majority ~.

30
51
-21

On our return to the gallery,
Mr. STUART complained of the conduct of the Go-
vernment in forcing on this measure, which Honourable
Members had not had time to consider. He thought

there was great necessity for delay. He hoped. the NOble
Lord would not drive the House into discussion and
division in order to obtain time for consideration of
the Bill.
Yr. FREWEN said that he should more that the
He,',ie should go into Committee on the Bill on this day
thr4y months, for the purpose of giving time for consi-
deration. He protested against Bills being brought
down from the other House at this late period of the
sessioa and forced through this House.
Sir B. HALL hoped that if the House went into
Committee, it would be on the understanding that the
Bill should not he Massed into law this session.
Mr. CAYLEY thought that unless some provision
were introduced into the Bill for the protection of the
lessee, they ought not to attempt to carry it on. He
hoped the Government would make a promise to this
effect.
Colonel SIBTHORP supported the amendment.
Lord J. RUSSELL declined to pledge himself to in-
troduce any clause into the Bill, as suggested by the
Hon. Member fur the North Riding. In reference to
' this subject, he wished to inform the House that it was
not his intention to pro;leed with the Charitable Trusts
Bill this session.—(Hear,
.bear.)
Mr. HENLEY thought the best course would be to
zo into Committee now on the Bill on the understanding
that it should not be proceeded with further this session.
Lord J. RUSSELL said he did not think that they
would be gaining anything by this course, as Hon.
Members would not consent next year to take the Bill
intact as it came from the Committee of this year, with-
out proposing their amendments anew.
The House then divided, when there appeared
For going into Committee 48
Against it 37
Majority —ll
Lord J. RUSSELL, in reply to Mr. Cayley, said he
would consent to the Bill now going into Committee pro
forma, and then to postpone the further proceeding of the
Bill in Committee until Monday.
The Bill then went pro forma through Committee,
and was fixed fur Monday at five o'clock.
Lord J. RUSSELL also intimated that the House
would sit at twelve on Monday; and that the first Bill
to be then proceeded with was the Patent Law Amend-
ment Bill.

GENERAL BOARD OF HEALTH (No. 4) BILL.
Mr. T. EGER CON having presented a petition,
signed by several members of the town council and one-
third of the rated inhabitants of Macclesfield, praying
that that borough might be included in the operation of
the Bill.

The House went into Committee, and the several
clauses were agreed to.
On the schedule being read,
Mr. T. EGERTON moved the insertion of Maceles•

field in that part of the Bill.
Mr. BROCKLEHURST opposed the motion, and
contended that, although one-third of the ratepayers
might hare signed the petition presented by the Hon.
Gentleman, yet that the remaining two-thirds objected
to the prayer of the petition altogether.
Mr. J. WILLIAMS also opposed the motion, and
said he was convinced that the teeling of the majority of
the inhabitants was hostile to the Bill.
Mr. G. LEIGH supported the motion, and expressed
his opinion that it was absolutely necessary that the
town of Macclesfield should be included ie the Bill.
Lord SEYMOUR also supported the motion, observ-
ing that the Board of Health were favourable to the
extension of the provisions of the Bill to that town.
Mr. MUNTZ opposed the motion; and,
After a few words from Mr. NEWDEGATE,
The Committee divided, when there appeared—
For inserting Macclesfield in the schedule 50
Again,t it ... ••• 16
MacclesfieldMajority
w a
was then
tehne
insertedotio n 3
n schedule,
the preamble having been agreed to, the House resumed,
and the CHAIRMAN reported progre•s.
r-e, and 4
CAN lERBURY ASSOCIATION BILL.

The House went into Committee on this Bill.
Sir J. PARINGTON sAd that by an arrangement
which he had made with the Noble Lord at, the head of
the Government, that Noble Lord had undertaken that
he (Sir J. Pukington) should have this evening to bring
on the subject of which he had given notice of a motion
(sugar refining in bond)—a subject of great importance
to the parties interested and the public at large. There
were only five orders now on the paper to be disposed
of before his motion came on, and he feared when they
were gone through he would find himself in the position
of Mr. Bourke, who " went on refining while others
were dining." lie hoped no more orders would be gone
through until he was afforded an opportunity of bring-
ing on his motion.
Mr. C. LEWIS said it was understood that all the
orders were to be disposed of before the Hon. Gentle-
man's motion was to be brought on. The remaining
orders would not take up much time.
Sir J. FAKING TON begged to say that the under-
stariding was very different from that stated by the Hon.
Gentleman.
Mr. C. LEWIS—This is not a Government Bill.
The several clauses of the Bill were agreed to, the
preamble was passed, and the House resumed.
NUISANCES' REMOVAL AND DISEASES PRE-

MENTION BILL.
On the order of the day for going into Committee on
this Bill,
Sir J. PAKINGTON again appealed to the Right
Hon. Gentlemen on the Treasury bench not to proceed
with any further orders until he could bring on his me-
Lion. Ho moved that the order of the day be postponed.
Lord SEYMOUR said the Bill would not occupy more
than a few minutes.
Sir J. PAKINGTON would not withdraw his motion
unless the Government kept good faith with him.
Lord PALMERSTON observed that undoubtedly an
arrangement had been made with the Hon. Gentleman,
and if the orders on the paper were matters of import-
ance which would create discussion they would not be
pressed, but they were mere matters of form.
The Hon. Gentleman did not press his motion, and the
Bill passed through Committee.
The Petty Sessions (Ireland) Amended Bill was con-
sidered, the amendments were agreed to, and the Bill
ordered to be reported.
The Summary Jurisdiction (Ireland) Bill was also
considered as amended; the amendments agreed to, and
the Bill ordered to be reported.
The Collection of Fines, &c. (Ireland) Bill was read a
third time and passed.
The Constabulary Force (Ireland) Bill as amended
was considered; the amendmeuts agreed to, and the Bill
ordered to be reported.
The Yeoman Usher of the Black Rod here advanced to
the table, snd summoned the House to the House of
Lords to hear the Royal assent given by commission
to several Bills.
the The
n.SPEAKER, Membersaccompanied d to
their Lordships' House, and after a short absence
present, abeyeetrhdeieggreater p onion of
re-
turned, when accordingly proceeded
(tor which se
The SPEAKER announced that the Royael
Lasesrednst,
had been given to several Bills,
report.)
Sir
O eantrineetuartnienwaosf
orderedn th e motion
relating
to of
juvenileJ PAKlNGTON,offenders
(in
e
Parliamentary paßpeEr,FNlNo.Ete,soutGseAssß.ioa 1849).
Mr. LABOUCHERE presented a petition from 23
out of 25 or 27 sugar refining houses in London against
any alteration in the present law regulating the system
of refining sugars.
Sir J. PAKINGTON then rose to bring forward the
motion of which he had given notice. After the unex-
pectedly protracted sitting of the morning, he felt that
he brought forward this subject at a disadvantage; but
his justification was, that he could not allow the session
to close without pressing it on the attention of Parlia-
ment as of the utmost importance to the classes imme-
diately concerned in this question. He approached it
with no party feeling or party object; and his desire was
entirely to make a calm appeal to the House and to the
Government for justice to these clases. He therefore
hoped he would be met with no pretexts of expedience,
or with the views of some three-and-twenty London
houses; but that they would say whether or no, by force
of argument, and on the ground of consistency and jus-
tice, a material alteration ought not to be made in the
laws regulating the refining of sugar in this country.
There were two classes affected by the present law, as
regarded the refining of sugar—one the refiners, the other
the British grower in the colonies. Reverting to the
Eli st-narned class, from some of whom the Right Hon.
Gentleman had presented a petition, he (Sir J. Puking-
ton) was aware that a large proportion of the London
refiners were opposed to the change, end that the re-
finers generally were divided on this subject; but he was

Also aware that, taking England and Scotland into conside
ration, a large number—he talieved numerically one- I
half, and he was certain folly that amount in point of '
quantity—were favourable to the change he desired,
and most anxious to promote it. For the last twenty
years sugar had been allowed to be refined in bond in
this country for exportation, though not for home con-
sum ptiou. The consequence of this was that the refiner
for home consumption laboured under a double disad-
vantage. He was met by the Dutch refiner on the one
side, who received a bounty from his Government equal
to 2s. 6d. on the cwt. upon all refined sugar exported
from Holland; while on the other hand he was cramped
by the restrictions imposed by the law upon his trade.
The English refiners were, under these circumstances,
not able to compete with the foreign refiner, nor even
with the native refiner for exportation. They wished,
therefore, to have the option of refining in bond, in the
same way as the latter, end so to be enabled to come upon
fair terms to the home market. To come into the market
at present they were obliged to resort to the vexatious
and costly course of exporting their produce to
Jersey or Guernsey, so as that it should touch the land;
and then of re-importing it as refined sugar from abroad;
being by this means exposed to double charges, and all
the hardships of a circuitous transfer of their property,
because of an absurd and oppressive law. lie (Sir J.
Pakington) bad been assured by one large refining house
that last year alone it cost them no less than 1,300/ to
bring their sugar into the home market in that manner.
Would the Government defend the law which made such
a course of proceeding imperative upon men only desir-
ous of fairly exercising their trade? Then there were
this refiners in Scotland, many of whom by means of
scientific inventions had been enabled to work coarse
sugar up into fine; but who said that if the existing law
was persevered in, when all sugars were placed on a par
in point of duty, their trade would altogether cease.
Turning, however, from sugar refiners to the more im-
portant part of the subject—namely. that the Govern-
ment and the House were bound, in justice to the
British colonists, to carry out their own legislation as
regarded free trade—how did it stand? The British
grower was at present under a most serious disadvantage
in respect of these laws. He (Sir J. Pakington) would
not then refer to the sugar duties, as he had given a notice
respecting them for the next session, and he should
merely advert to them, therefore, only in so far as they
affected the question of refining sugar in bond. Many
lion. Members no doubt thought that for reasons of
state policy it was desirable to admit all sugars at an
equal duty. He thought differently; but at all events
no one could deny that great hardships were inflicted on
the West India colonists, and that in carrying out those
principles of legislation the Government had no right
to shape laws so as to inflict additional injustice, by
placing British sugar in the position of disadvantage in
which it was placed at present. The differential duty
on sugar under the Act of 1848 was ss. 6d. per cwt., it
was true; but such was the operation of the law regu-
lating refining, that at least Is. 6i. per cwt. of that sum
had to be allowed for on the comparison in consequence
of the difference in quality of the British grown and
foreign sugars. Assuming no change to take place until
1854, when sugars—British and foreign—were to be
placed on an equality as regarded duty, he was pre-
pared to prove that instead of equality, it would be
most oppressive to the British grower. After 1854 there
would ba a duty of 13s. 4d. per cwt. on refined sugar;
and a duty of 10s. per cwt. upon white clayed, British
Muscovado, and foreign brown clayed sugar. The
whole of the British sugar, or at least nine-
teenth-twentieths of it, which was of an in-
ferior character, would therefore have to pay
only the same duty as the superior sugars from Havannah
and Java. The difference as regarded produce in re-
fining was, however, enormous, because while the British
colonial sugars gave in some instances only 321 b. to the
cwt., and upon the average not more than 50Ib. of re-
fined produce, the superior sugars of the Havannah and
Java yielded no less than an average of 901 b. in the cwt.
Therefore, when the sugar growers of the East Indies
paid the same duty as those of Cuba and Java, it was
obviously unjust. It was therefore ho demanded that
the Government should accede to his proposition, and
permit the refiners to pay the duty only on the quantity
refined. This would be an ad valorem duty; it would,
therefore, be a duty not new in principle to the revenue,
and it would, moreover, he an act of justice to the
British colonies as well as to the public.—(Hear, hear.)
Deputations on the subject had waited on the Noble Lord
and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, but they had
learned nothing from either. It was, therefore, fur the
Government to state what was intended. The subject,
however, was not a new one. It had been before Parlia-
ment, and it had found an advocate in the lion. Member
for Westbury in 1848. That Hon. Member had sat on
the Committee of that year, presided over by the late
lamented Lord G. Bentinck, and, among several sets of
resolutions, one set was proposed by that Hon. Member,
to the effect, that from the evidence taken, it appeared
clear that the mode of levying the duty, without suffi-
cient regard to the variation of its qualities, imposed
practical disadvantages on the producer in the British
colonies, That was a recognition of the principle he
(Sir J. Pakington) contended for. The Right Hon. the
Chancellor of the Exchequer, in the same year, said he
could not at the present introduce a measure for refining
sugar in bond, but that he was far from underrating its
importance to the trade. He (Sir J. Pakington) did not
contend that these amounted to promises; but when the
Chancellor of the Exchequer said he was not prepared
" at the present" to introduce a measure on the subject,
it was a fair presumption that the Government would
bring in a measure of that kind on a future day. The
Right Hon. President of the Board of Trade had also
on that occasion agreed with his colleague, stating that
if it were possible to do so with security to the revenue,
it would be a most important boon to the West India
interests. He (Sir J. Pakington) now called ou the
Right Honourable Gentleman to show how the revenue
could be endangered by the concession. The Right Hon.
Gentleman had, in presenting the petition from the sugar
refiners of London, only strengthened his (Sir J. Pak-
ingtors's) argument. He bore the fullest testimony to
the respectability of these gentlemen; but what he ob-
jected to Was, that they had got a good thing, and they
naturally wished to keep it. The real secret of their objec-
tion to change lay in the fact, that under the existing law,
as the duty was paid at the same time as the sugar was
purchased, it required a very large capital to enter the
trade. The consequence was, that the trade had fallen
into a few hands; and a monopoly was practically esta-
blished which they desired to maintain. The fact was,
that about ten or twelve houses controlled the sugar
market of the country in a manner entirely inconsistent
with the interest of the consumer. That was the way
in which he dealt with the petition presented by the
Right Hon. Gentleman. As an instance of the opera-
tion of the law in this respect, he would state a single
fact. On sth July last a fall took place in the duty on
British sugar equal to ls. per cwt., and on that on foreign
sugar equal to Is. 6d. per cwt. A more than commen-
surate fall in the price of the article followed; raw sugar
going down to the extent of 2s. per cwt. But would the
House believe it, the price of refined sugar remained,
notwithstanding this fall, the same as before; and the
refiner, therefore, pocketed, as against the public, the 2s.
per cwt. difference. There was also another cage. No
doubt the sugar brokers of the country were opposed to
change in the law; but why? They were paid a com-
mission of el; per cent. on the sales, and as the duty and
sugar were pail for together— both being included in the
transaction, their gain was all the greater. He asked the
Government, however, to bear in mind their own princi-
ples of free trade, and to give the advantage to the con-
sumer. One of the many objections that could be urged
against the proposal was an apprehension of danger
to the revenue; but he demanded to have it shown
how. He would be answered, no doubt, that it would
effect the revenue directly in the first instance; t!,nsd,rlen_
the second, indirectly, by promoting fraud. A
garded the first objection, no doubt the result of the
change desired would be that all the infer or
sug sugarsars
would be refined in bond, while the dsup.ior d
that to
would be refined out of bond; and he atte
some extent the revenue from that soumroicveermnmigehutt be
affected. But he denied the right of
oaoury
eg;
-c
and he had
recruit its revenue from an unjuisgtosry
law which would
no objection whatever to a cdon:
,-.Pbuond. This would pro-
cause all sugars to be refine
duce a counterbalance, and cempendsate
thetoindirect loss
for the possible loss.
by fraud, he only askesduthe Government to tell him how
gar had been refined in bond for
it could take place?
exportation for the lastd -tvi.‘evnhtyatyehaerss,ouagnhdtnwo
acomplaint
of fraud had been ma e.
he appealed
to extend that system to sugar for the home market as
well as to sugar for exportation. Finally,
to the sense of justice of the House and to the consist-
ency of the Government, and concluded by proposing
the following resolution:—" That, in the opinion of this
House, the British refiners of sugar should be permitted
to refine in bond, and to enter their manufacture for
home consumption, upon payment of the same duties as
are levied upon refined sugar imported into this
country.
Mr. LABOUCIIERE would state to the House in a
few words the reason why he could not agree to the
resolution; but, before doing so, he expressed his deep
regret at the unavoidable absence of his Right Hon.
Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer, who had given
the subject such careful consideration from every point
of view in which it could be looked at. He did not at
all dispute that restrictions imposed on refined sugar,
like all other restrictions, operated unfavourably on
those concerned in the particular case to which they ap-
plied, and it would be an undoubted boon to all parties
if sugar could be imported and refined for home consump-
tion duty free. But a revenue to the amount of
4,000,0001. was involved iu the consideration, and the
question was whether they were prepared to make that
sacrifice. It was the anxious desire of the Government
to remove all needless restrictions. But the provision of
which the Hon. Baronet complained was, that, as under
the present system the sugar coming from the British
o i
lonics was imported in a coarser state than that which
cca
use from Cuba and other foreign countries, the former
was subjected to discouragement by the imposition
of a duty which was meant to apply equally to fo-
reign and English sugar. The question was maturely
considered by the Committee which sat in
1848, and over which Lord G. Bentinck presided, and
the Hon. Member fur Westbury coincided with the other
Members in thinking that a substantial grievance was
thereby inflicted on the West Indian interest. But did
no alteration take place in consequence of that investi-
gation? On the contrary, a material change was made
on that very ground, which had materially diminished
that grievance. He believed that tho sugar now im.
ported from the British possessions approached far more
nearly to the qualities of foreign sugar than before. A
great deal of energy and activity had been displa) ed,
and the result had been a great improvement in the
process of working the sugar. It was also satisfac-
toryjt to know that no reason existed for supposing that
any diminution in the importation of sugar from our
colonies had taken place of late years. The importation
from the West Indies had somewhat fallen off during the
present year; but that was attributable to the short sup-
Jamaica in consequenc© of the cholera.
ply furnished by

Bet this did not apply to the other West Indian colonies
But, taking the triennial average, there s..as no reason
to believe that the supply of sugar from our
colonies was decreasing, eltbouo he rejoiced to
say that from other quarters the supply had greatly
increased, to the great advantage of the revenue and
the consumer, and, he hoped and believed, without any
injury to the prcelsucer in the, West or East Indies. In
the three years from 1839 to 1841 inclusive the importa-
tion from the British West Indies was 9,389,000 cwt.;
from 1842 to 1844 inclusive, 2,487,000 ewt.; from 1845
to 1847 inclusive, 2,733,000 cwt.; and from 1848 to 1850,
2,740,000 cwt. From the Mauritius the increase bad
been larger. In the first period, the importation was
620,000 cwt.; in the second, 568,000 cwt.; in the third,
918,000 cwt.; and in the last, 929,000 cwt. From the
East Indies it was, in the first period, 746 000 cwt.; in
tee second, 1,044,000 cwt.; in the third, 1,386,000 cwt.;
and for the last, 1,381,000 cwt. With regard to price s
also our producers had no right to complain, for the
price for the four years ending Dec. 31, 1842, was 225.;
the four years ending 1845, 235.; the four years ending
1849, 265.; and the four years ending 1850, 275. He
now came to the real objection to the motion. The Ho-
nourable Baronet had treated rather lightly the petition
of the London sugar refiners which he had laid on the
table that evening. It was signed by almost every
sugar refiner in this town, and the sugar-refining trade
in London was something larger than that of the
whole of the rest of the United Kingdom, so that he
altogether denied the accuracy of the statement that there
teas a division amongst the refiners on the subject. Ho
denied that the sugar refiners of Glasgow and Liverpool
were all of the other way of thinking. lie denied, from
any representations which had come to his knowledge
from the sugar refiners elsewhere, that anything like a
unanimous feeling existed in favour of the alteration
pressed for by the Hon. Baronet. As he had already
stated, the case had been submitted to the Government,
and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, after going into the
whole case with a sincere desire to afford as much liberty
to the sugar refiners as was consistent with the interests
of the revenue, after receiving repeated deputations from
the sugar refiners, and employing some of the most ex-
perienced officers of the Excise to examine into the pro-
cess of refining, saw that it would be impossible to afford
the relief required without imposing numerous restric-
tions; and when these restrictions were submitted to
the sugar refiners, they did not eetempt to gainsay the
report of the officers, but said they would rather
not take the privileges accompanied with the
restrictions. The chief difficulty lay in the com-
plicated nature of the refining process, the residue
of one operation being carried to another, so that a sys-
tem of restrictions, intermeddliug, and watching would
he the necessary result. The sugar refining for expor-
tath n was in the hands of a very few, who conducted
their operations on a very large scale, and it was not so
difficult to conduct this part of the trade consistently with
the security of the public revenue; but it would be im-
possible to do so with a view to the home market. It
would be necessary that those engaged in it should alter
the situation of their premises and rebuild them; and
even then there would be the greatest risk of fraud.
With these facts established by the testimony of prac-
tical authorities, the Chancellor of the Exchequer would
not have done his duty to the public revenue if he had con-
ceded the relaxation sought. He believed that those who
were anxious for the change were persons who had two
establishments—one in bond for export, and the other
out of bond for the home market; but the other part 0f
the trade were of opinion that to yield to their desire
would be to inflict injustice on the rest. A resolution
was passed on the 7th of April of the present year, by a
meeting at which all the great sugar refiners were as-
sembled, in which it wis resolved that, referring to the
report of the officers of Excise in 1849, wherein it was
stated that in order to protect the revenve from fraud it
would be necessary to impose inconvenient restrictions.
and having fully considered the present state of the sugar
trade, it was not for the interest of the trade to feria
on the Government at the present time the consideration
of a law for altering the system. With the evidence to
which he had referred, and this expression of opinion on
the part of those engaged in the trade, he ventured to
express a confident hope that tee House would not sanc-
tion the motion of the Hon. Baronet.
Mr. MITCHELL thought the speech just delivered
by the Right Hon. Gentleman fully justified the Hon.
Baronet in bringing forward the motion, even at this ad'
vanced period of the session; for grounds so weak for
resisting a proposal which he had admitted to be just he
had never heard. The object of the petition to which
reference had been made was to keep the trade in the
hands of a few large capitalists and exclude all others.
Such was not the policy of the country and of a very
large majority of the sugar-refiners of this country.
The Right Hon. Gentleman had hinted at dangers to
the revenue, but had given no reasons for his apprehea°
sinus; and with respect to the testimony on which here'
lied he should be the last to admit the authority of 9121'
cers acting under the Board of Excise upon such a point.
If improvement was to be made it must come from
some extraneous power. The best answer to the 013'
jections urged against the motion was, that the system
been in practical operation for eighteen years with'
out any allegation that fraud had been practised. The
safeguard against fraud was found in the large capital of
those engaged in the trade, which afforded a sure remedl.
to the Government and the number of workpeople none °,
sarily employed, which rendered all attempts at fraua
impracticable from the certainty of detection.
Mr. WILSON rose to address the House, when
An Hoer. MEMBER moved that the House be
7,
counted, and only thirty-seven Members being preen"
the House adjourned at a Quarter to Nine o'clock.

RAILWAY SHARE MARKETS.
BRISTOL, Alla. 1.
STocx ExcHicreni.—The market to-day is considerablf
better, and an advance has taken place in the value of shareldg:
Great Western, Original Shares, were done at 8654A—Midi5n
6 per cent. (Birmingham and Gloucester), 129 ex div.
South Devon (Six per Cents.), IPA—South-Eastern an
Dover, 23Ni. _ _

LIVERPOOL, AUG. 1.
STOCK EXCHANGE.—The share market continues firm'
hut prices are unaltered. The transactions were as follow:
Edinburgh and Glasgow, 28j—Lancashire and Yorkshire;
5034—Ditto, Fifths, 814 dis.—Ditto (West Riding Union)'
dis. Midland, 43 L,(,—Ditto, Halves, 195 s dis.--Shrtlif
bury and Chester, Preference, guaranteed 8 per cent, I._47ich
York, Newcastle, and Berwick, 6 dis.—York and Nor'
Midland, 19.

MANCHESTER, AUG. 1.
STOCK EXCJIANGE.—The business of the day has been
good, but prices have not shown any signs of improvernerit.
The transactions were as follow :—Caledonian, 104 -
Preference, '9 - East Lancashire, 14 7-16—Leeds, 59,:
London and North-Western, New Quarters. 4,A 134'1"
p•—
Manchester and Birmingham, Quarters (C), 2 3-16 VI
London and South-Western, 841—South-Eastern an
Pict°,

Dover, 221/2 n.
BIRMINGHAM, Auo. 1.
STOCK EXCHANGE.— The business transacted on 'Change
to-day was almost entirely confined to local stock. The
only sales reported were—Shrewsbury and Birminghate
(to.) , 2
), 19.
61/4dis.—S.........._...._______________________:____ hropshire Union (Ellesmere and Chest er,
[ADVERTISEMENT.] -- Holloway's Ointment and
Pills.—Extraordinary Cure of a Bad Foot.—Mr. Henry Kea"
newel', son of the late much respected surveyor of the South-
ampton District of St. Pancras, London, stated in a letter to
his mother from Burra Burra, Port Adelaide, that in his PIA
ney to those mines from Adelaide, he was compelled to stil
for want of a conveyance, and, in ; d
-e•ng so, he grazed, :a
afterwards poisoned his foot, which became so bad that be
~„„t ob-
under a surgeon's care for more than two months wit"Thiat-
taining any relief; he was then induced to t 1- Iloil
, a°
meat and Pills, which, in three weeks,wockrOkrn let:
reered hig
foot, and he was enabled to commence
venience.—Sold by all druggists,
Establishment, 244, Strand, dat ProfesPwsiet
PORPOISES IN THE T London.
BLACK NEAR e COD'
BRlDGE.—Thursday morning,'l.,. a larg
course of people assembled on, aboutllac six o c
'cbl°ridg'e to AVAIIeS:9
the gambols and freaks of a large kfriars-
porpoises, whie)ll
had been washed up the • shoal of _umr i
all twelve Itlloinweit°y%
river. They appeared to D five to
or fourteen, some ' front he
them measuring
seven feet in length. AI ofearly hour, t-.
t lough at such an
eastern side of the brid These strange vest.
eastern was crowded.
tors created much along the
tors amusement and excitement a sur-
looker-- •
a on, with their gambols and rolling about on the _ins
face of the water. They, however, disappeared about I.
o'clock, and nothing has since been seen of them.
•1 bitS
A NEW FLYING MACHINE.—A M. d'...-AT vt
helOW
es,
addressed a letter to one of the journals, in which 8. ho
with reference to the announcement that a DI. Salaillanc:was
invented a flying apparatus, that before M. Salamancarosa
engaged on this invention he had made considerable pllteed,
in experiments with the same object, and has now adVEOI"%.,
so much with his machine that he hopes to be able t bat
hibit its effects in the course of the autumn. He addsair,
his invention has many advantages over that of bf;.fctiag
manta, which, according to him, produces a motion afle,si..
the stomach like the sea sickness, and also requires "ba
derable muscular exertion; whereas M. d'Arville can'avel
says, with ease work his wings by the feet with pedals' ir se
the motion is so easy that he can write and read in the aterog
if he were on land seated in an arm-chair. lie Pre .'
that he will be able to fly with as much speed as a pigeon
Galignani.
„ p •c 129
PUBLIC INCOME AND EXPENDITURE.—CL --:°„„cie
was printed the Government balance-sheet of the, ~,L,3,, 'a.
and expenditure for the year ending the sth ult. ,L,",-.48101-
come was 53,045,2671. Os., and the expenditure 50,u''-ciittirel
13s. 4d., showing an excess of income over the exPen 1- the
of 3,032,7861. 7s. sd. The balances in the Exchequer ea the
sth of July last year were $.900,380/. la. 103/0., and °
sth ult they amounted to 7,934,1541. 9s. 63/d
4 •
_............%i

BIRTHS.
OF A SON. Vile °I
On the 20th ult., at Derby-house, Sunbury, the
the Rev. Thomas Hayes. Elliot
On the 31st ult., at Denmark-hill, the wife of Dr. R •,q,
On the 28th ult., at Ecton, the wife of B. Tunnard'
OF A DAUGHTER. Cart'
On the 29th ult., at Saville-row, the wife of P.
Wright, jun., Eq.
On the 31st ult., at Mansfield-street, Mrs. Charles Milli'
ners Lushington.

MARRIED. it
On the 26th ult., at Brussels Murray Macgregor, Ycitis'.,
son of the late Lieutenant-Colonel Valentine Blacker, bor
Surveyor-General of India, to Frances Elizabeth, dnigh.
of the late S. Blacker, LL.D., rector of 11h.,

DIED.
At Penrith, on the 26th ult., Lieutenant-Colonel (-I
F. Macleod, C. 8., late Royal Engineers. , i, of
On the 27th ult , in London, Sir Page Dick, age" -
Port-hall, near Brighton.
",
At Greenwich, on the 30th ult., Lieutenant Andoe,
tf
On the 29th ult., George Kelly, Esq., of Mucklon, cu
of Galway', Ireland, aged 78. v 9 nee'
On the 29th ult., at Mymms-villa, Albert-road, x.eve
park, Mrs. Henry Batson, aged 46. vlovver,
On the 29th ult., at Peckham, Surrey, Matthew •V
Esq
0., late of St. John's Southwark, aged 87. ,d
On the 30th ult., at, Durham-place, Ilackney-roe.
Dlr
Sarah Berry, aged 83.
On the 21th ult., at Epping, Captain 11. F. Barker, late °f
the Madras Fusiliers.

London: Printed and Published by ULTIMO YOIJN(7O,
No. 112, Strand, Printer, at The Sun Office, 10'
tia.,
, 0
Strand, in the Precinct of the Savoy, in the se
Kiddlynx, Saturday, August 2s 1851'