The Sun.
London, England, 1834-09-06 00:00:00

ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE.

NORTHERN CIRCUIT.—LANcAtinia, Sari'. 4.
(Before Mr. Baron GURNEY.)
TATHAM V. WRIGHT (TENTH DAY).
On Wednesday Baron GURNEY summed up the evi-
dence. The Jury retired to consider of their verdict, and
after an absence of two hours returned into Court and
delivered in their verdict for the defendant, thereby esta-
blishing the will ; so that after two trials, in two different
counties, and each terminating in favour of the validity of
the will, it may be presumed that it will not be further
disputed.

NEW PALACE COURT.

COLEY AND ANOTHER V. BARHAM.

The plaintiffs in this case are coal-merchants, carrying on
business at New Bridge House Wharf, Lambeth, and the
defendant is a respectable accountant, residing near Wel-
lington-street, in the Strand. The plaintiffs sought to re-
cover three pounds odd for coals supplied to the defendant's
wife in November last. It was proved in evidence that the
defendant was called upon for the account about six weeks
after the delivery of the coals, when the defendant said
that he knew nothing of the bill ; that he supposed
the coals had been delivered during his absence from town,
and that he would speak to Mrs. Barham, and if the ac-
count proved to be correct it should be paid." It was
further proved that the defendant's wife had since given
repeated promises to discharge the account, which was
contended by the plaintiffs' Counsel was sufficient to show
that the coals were had with the defendant's knowledge.
Mr. Judge CASELY said that the evidence was not suffi-
cient for the case to go to the Jury. The defendant's wife
could not be made evidence against her husband, and, as it
had not been stated by the plaintiffs' witnesses that the de-
fendant himself had admitted the plaintiffs' claim, they
were not entitled to a verdict. If it had been proved that
the defendant carried on a business where coals were con-
stantly required, and his wife was in the habit of conducting
that business, the law would presume that she was acting
as agent for her husband, and the plaintiffs' claim would be
allowed.

On the application of Mr. Ross, the plaintiffs' Counsel,
the Learned Judge consented to allow time for the produc-
tion of further evidence.

OLD BAILEY SESSIONS, AUGUST 4.

(Before Mr. Common Sergeant MI REHO USE.)
ROBBERY BY A SERVANT.

Ann Vickers, so well known to the public iu connection
with the case of the Lady of Colonel Hampton and the late
unfortunate Mr. Tuffnell, who committed suicide in conse-
quence, was put to the bar, charged with stealing on the
10th of July two cups and saucers, chocolate stirrers, some
bottles, glass saltcellers, spoons, napkins, handkerchiefs,
table cloths, carpets, dusters, chintz curtains, wax candles,
shawls, fifty numbers of the Mirror and Penny Magazine,
&c., the property of Edward Dove and Ellen Chandler,
Clifford-street, Bond-street.

Mary Dove, wife to the prosecutor, who keeps a hair-
dresser's shop in Clifford-street, had hired the prisoner on
the 17th of February. She remained in her service until
the 10th of July. During that period witness missed a
great quantity of small articles, which induced her to apply
for a search-warrant, on the prisoner leaving her service.
Ellen Chandler, a nursemaid, also in her service, aceom-
panied witness and the officers Schofield and Davis; of
Marlborough-street office, to the lodgings of the prisoner, at
No. 6, West-row, Carnaby-market. The prisoner was not
present when they got there ; but a search was, notwith-
standing, commenced, and a shawl, the property of Eliza-
beth Chandler, and other articles—wax candles, cups and
saucers—the property of the prosecutor, were found in the
kitchen. Witness identified some of the property as her
husband's ; and swore that the remainder, the candles for
instance, were, to the best of her belief, her husband's
also. The prisoner's boxes were then searched, and other
articles of the prosecutor's property found therein.
They were all produced in Court, and identified by the
witness.

In her cross-examination by Mr. PHILLIPS, witness ad-
mitted that a messenger had come, purporting to be from
the prisoner, with a message to Eliza Chandler, to the
effect that she would restore her shawl, if she paid he,-
shilling which she owed her. .
a,
The Common-Sergeant, et -

va Of p I

of the trial, sug-

gested that if the shawl were thrown out of the case on
this evidence it would tend to simplify it very much.
Witness further deposed that the prisoner, on entering
her service, had given her a letter of character from Mrs.
Hampton, wife of Colonel Hampton, then under a prose-
cution for perjury, arising out of a well-remembered trial,
which letter witness handed over to that lady at her lodg-
ings, whither she had gone to find her for the purpose, Wit-
ness had no connection, directly or indirectly, with Mrs.
Hampton in respect to this trial, and had no other motive
in prosecuting it than the furtherance of public justice.
George Davis, police-officer, of Marlborough-street
Office, deposed to the same effect as Mrs. Dove, especially
in regard to the finding the property. Schofield, the other
officer, was also present at the search.
The prisoner, still a good-looking young woman, though
considerably altered for the worse since her former trial
at the Old Bailey, addressed the Court and Jury in a low
voice, but with great collectedness and apparent compo-
sure. She stated that she had entered the service of the
prosecutor on a written character, subsequent to her leav-
ing the service of Mrs. Hampton, and her late trial at the
Old Bailey. Up to that period she had been a servant
from the age of nine years, with an irreproachable character.
Her story, though complicated, and in most instances irre-
levant, was very fluently told, and expressed in language
extraordinary for its selection and appropriateness ; artful
in the extreme, as far as it involved the sympathies of the
Jury. She broadly stated that the present prosecution was
for the purpose of getting her out of the way, as she was a
most material witness against Mrs. Hampton ; and she
added, that a long time previous to its being instituted
against her, Mrs. Dove had made propositions to her to
leave London till the trial was over, promising her, as from
Mrs. Hampton, any sum she chose to ask. She denied the
charge of theft, alleging she had received the property from
Mrs. Dove, and attempted a retort upon the prosecutors, by
alleging several matters against them. Her address occu-
pied a considerable length of time, very near an hour, but
it contained nothing save imputations of other parties, which
we do not consider it our duty to publish.
Some witnesses were called by the prisoner.
The Jury, after a short deliberation, returned a verdict
of Guilty, but recommended her to mercy.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.

MANSION-HO USE.

Yesterday a poor woman, named Elizabeth Thonzas, ap-
plied to the LORD MAYOR to intercede with the owner of
a lodging-house in Clerkenwell to obtain for her a counter-
feit arm, which was detained from her, and the want of
which prevented her from making her bread.
The statement which she made was a very affecting one.
In December, 1828, she met with an accident and injured
her left hand against a fender. She went to a medical gen-
tleman, who prescribed for her for some time, but she re-
ceived no relief from his attendance, and went by the advice
of her acquaintances into St. Thomas's. Hospital, under Mr.
Green, and remained there nine months ; at the end of
which she came out, but without deriving benefit, so viru-
lent was the nature of the injury. She afterwards was taken
into Bartholomew's Hospital, and remained under the care
of Mr. Vincent for three months, but still relief came 'not,
and back she went to St. Thomas's again, and remained six
months more. On the 21st of April, 1830, after having suf-
fered most bitterly, her band was amputated a little above
the• wrist, and in four weeks it was healed. The pain,
however, returned soon, and the unfortunate patient un-
derwent great agony. The arm was amputated above the
elbow by Mr. Langstaff on the 18th May, 1831, and she
found temporary relief, but the inflammation returned.
About six weeks afterwards two incisions were made in the
arm I the main bloodvessel was cut, and the patient lost a
great deal of blood. She was taken again to Bartholomew's
Hospital, where other operations were performed upon her,
but with no better effect than attended those which were
first tried. She remained in the Hospital three months
upon this occasion, but nothing would heal the wound, and
she came out and suffered inconceivable misery for two
months, at the expiration of which she appiied at the Lon-
don Hospital, and was there under the care of Mr. Luke
for six months. She obtained some alleviation of pain there,
but it returned, and for two years more she was subject to
daily and nightly torture. On the 16th of April, 1834,
she was received into Guy's Hospital under Mr. Bransby
Cooper, who found it necessary to cut away the rest of the
arm right out of the shoulder-joint (as the poor sufferer de-
scribed the operation), on the 27th May. She now thanked
God that she was free from pain after six years' misery, but
she was debarred from earning her livelihood by the unin-
dulgent conduct of her landlady.
The Lord Mayor asked whether the gentlemen who
superintended these hospitals had not made a subscription
for a person who had gone through torture, the idea of
which was enough to afflict any heart ?
The young woman considered herself obliged beyond any
thing by the great attention and kindness of the gentlemen,
who showed great compassion for her case. When first she
lost part of her arm, she was supplied by them with a false
arm with a hook to it, and she could contrive by means of
that to support herself by sewing.. She, however, contracted
a debt of 9s. for lodging with her landlady, who seized upon
her " hand," and kept it as security.
The Lord Mayor much regretted that a landlady was to
be found who had so hard a heart as to treat the poor girl
with such cruelty. His Lordship then directed an officer
to redeem the hand immediately, made a present to the
grateful. applicant of a sovereign in the name of the Lady
Mayoress, and addressed her in such terms of kindness and
sYmpathy as drew tears from her.

QUEEN- S QU ARE.
Yesterday Thomas Dyer, a journeyman carpenter, a
member of the Trades' Union, was brought up in custody of
a police constable, and placed at the bar before Messrs.
BURRELL and GREGORIE, charged with assaulting James
Buckley, a painter and glazier, in the employ of Messrs.
Bennett and Hunt, builders, of the Horseferry-road, West-
minster, and using abusive language to him, because he
would not join the Unions.
Mr. Shuter, solicitor, of Milbank-street, attended for the
prosecution.

The complainant was in the employ of Messrs. Bennett
and Hunt, builders, and was at work with several other
men at Sir William Gordon's house, near the Royal Hos-
pital, at Chelsea. That morning, between eight and nine
o'clock, as he was sitting at the Phoenix public-house in
Smith-street, getting his breakfast with some of the work-
men employed at Sir William Gordon's, the defendant, who
was quite a stranger to him, came into the room where they
were sitting, and began to abuse them all, calling them a
parcel of " black ones" for signing the master's document.
They took not the slightest notice of him, and he continued
his abuse. As they were going out to their work witness
requested him to let him alone, but he still continued call-
ing them all sorts of names. Witness told him if he did
not desist he would strike him, and shook his fist at him.
The defendant immediately made a cut at him with a
knife which he had in his hand, which fortunately missed
him. Witness then struck at defendant, and his blow
missed him. The defendant then made a second cut at
him with the knife, and cut him across the face. He im-
mediately went out and got a police constable, who took
the defendant into custody.
Mr. Shuter—Do you belong to the Trades' Union ?
Witness—l do not ; I never belonged to any Union at all.
Mr. GREGORIE—Was there any person with him ?
Witness—Yes, there was one man with him, but there were
several men in the street. Only on the previous day they
were insulted and abused, and there was a great disturbance
in the street. When they were at breakfast on the pre-
vious day, the defendant came in and abused them, and
called them a parcel of crawling fellows for signing
the document.

Mr. Shuter said that it was an extremely hard case that
inen—because they would not join the Trades' Union—
should be treated in such a scandalous manner. A very
little more, and he might have killed the complainant with
his knife.

Mr. Shuter was about to call his witnesses, when the ma-
gistrates, having consulted together, said that they thought
it was a case which ought to be decided at the sessions and
not before them.

Mr. Shuter was ready to accede to any course the Ma-
gistrates thought best, and the case was adjourned until
the Sessions.

HA T T ON- GARDEN.
Yesterday, John Murray, a labourer, was brought to
this office on a warrant, and placed at the bar before Mr.
ROGERS and Mr. Sergeant SELLON, charged by John
Lynch, a labourer in the employ of Mr. Cubitt, the builder,
of Gray's Inn-road, with having committed a violent assault
upon him under the following circumstances :-
1 Mr. Evans, solicitor to Mr. Cubitt, attended on the part
of the prosecution.
John Lynch, on Sunday night last, about ten o'clock,
was returning home through Buckeridge-street, St. Giles's,
when the prisoner came up to hiM and said, " Do you not
work for Mr. Cubitt ?" Witness replied, " Yes, I do,"
On which the prisoner said, " Then I suppose that you are
one of those who signed the document,' and he gave
him a violent blow on the eye, which blackened and swelled
it, when he repeated his blows and kicked him, making use
of horrid expressions, until at length be fell down. He
was then surrounded by a number of Unionists, who, with
the prisoner, beat and kicked him whilst he was on the
ground. Witness contrived to get u", and he was again
beaten
waking has escape.d kicked by the prisoneruntil he succeeded in
Mr. Sergeant SELL,-
any witnesses to
,„..-.Have you got
persons
corroborate
witr .„Jur statement ?
to come
..„,„le
d the transaction, but they are afraidLynch—Several pe
for-
ward, as the Unionists would treat them with violence if
they did so.
MrSergeantELLOVit is certainly • S a most serious

case. Your statement may be all true ; bat unless you
bring forward some witnesses, I am afraid the case must fail.
Lynch—l assure your Worship what I have said is true.
Mr. ROGERS—Is the prosecutor now in Mr. Cubitt's
employ ? Mr. Evans—He is, your Worship, and has been
so for the last six weeks or two months.

Mr. ROGERS—Has the prisoner ever been in that em-
ploy ? Mr. Evans—He has ;he was one of the party
that struck.

Mr. ROGERS called upon the prisoner for his defence.
Prisoner—On Sunday night last I was passing through
Buckeridge-street, St. Giles's, when the prosecutor said,
" There you are, Jack ; why don't you sign the docu-
ment ?" He then challenged me to fight, and we fought
two rounds ; but I deny the assault.
Walker, a policeman, 80 E division, on Sunday night
last, at twelve o'clock, was on duty in Buckeridge-
street, St. Giles's, when there was a desperate conflict be-
tween the Unionists and the parties who consented to work
for the masters. He saw the prosecutor and the prisoner
fighting, when he separated them, and advised the prosecu-
tor to go, but he was obstinate and would not. He struck
the prisoner first, and they had two rounds, when he took
out a knife from his pocket and threatened to stab him
(Walker) if he interfered.
Lynch—lt is false. I had no knife in my possession.
Walker was sworn to his statement.

Mr. Evans—Really, if this be true, lam astonished. I
have been informed to the contrary. (To Walker)—Pray
have you been drinking with any of tho Unionists since
Sunday night ? Walker—l have not.
_ _

Mr. Rogers—l ask you, on the oath you have taken,
whether you have drank with any of the Unionists prior to
the case being called on ? Walker—l have not, your Wor-
ship. What I drink I always pay for out of my own pocket.
Mr. EVANS—And you swear that you were on duty at
twelve o'clock on Sunday night last in Buckeridge-street ?
Walker—l was on duty all over the neighbourhood.
Mr. ROGERS—Answer the question directly. Were
you on duty in Buckeridge-street ? Walker—l was, your
Worship.

Mr. ROGERS (peremptorily)—And before you leave the
Court I again ask you, on the oath you have taken, have
you drank with any of the Unionists since Sunday last ?
Walker—l have not, Sir.

Mr. EVANS—And why have you not ? Walker—Be-
cause I pay for what I have myself for the sake of my
character and situation. The fact is, your Worship, those
hot-headed Irishmen, when they get a little drop in their
heads, would no more care about ripping your Worships
open than nothing at all, and then they'd be sorry for it
after.

Mr. RoGEas—Under the circumstances we must dis-
charge the prisoner.
Mr. Sergeant SELLON concurred, saying that the prose-
cutor ought to have brought witnesses.

The prisoner was reprimanded, and, being fined one
shilling, was discharged.

MAR YLEB ONE.

Yesterday Thomas Aldrich, a middle-aged man, respect-
ably attired, was charged with obtaining by fraudulent and
false pretences two shawls, value 21. 35., from Messrs.
Shoolbred and Co., linendrapers, Tottenham-court-road.

James Spasman, shopman to Messrs. Shoolbred and Co.,
deposed that the prisoner, who said he was ladies' cap
seller, was in the frequent habit of purchasing things at the
shop of his employers. On Saturday, the 19th of July, the
prisoner, having made some trifling purchase, asked witness
if he would let him have three Thibet shawls to show to
a lady. Witness said, " We'll send them to her,"-when the
prisoner replied, " No, it is at Hammersmith. I'm going
to take her some caps, and I will return the shawls before
eleven o'clock to-night, or early on Monday morning." Mr.
Shepherd, one of the partners, having consented, the priso-
ner took the shawl away, but not making his appearance
on Monday, witness went to his house, when the prisoner
returned him one of the shawls, and said he would bring
the money for the other two on the following Saturday.
He, however, " had kept scarce" ever since, which was the
reason of his being given in charge.

Mr. Shutt saidie could not interfere, and it was nothing
more than a debt ; they had trusted him from Tuesday
to Saturday, when he did not pay, and had ever since ne-
glected to do so.
Witness—This same man has obtained three shawls
from my aunt, who keeps a shop at Islington, under similar
circumstances.

Mr. Shutt—l cannot interfere in the case now before
me—the prisoner is therefore discharged.

FROM LAST NIGHTS GAZETTE.

CIRCUITS OF THE COMMISSIONERS FOR RELIEF

OF INSOLVENT DEBTORS.
AUTUMN CIRCUITS, 1834.

NORTHERN CIRCUIT.
H. R. REYNOLDS, Esq., Chief Commissioner.
Rutlandshire—Oakham, Wednesday, Oct. 22.
Lincolnshire—Lincoln and City, Thursday, Oct. 23.
Nottinghamshire—Nottingham and Town, Saturday, Oct. 23.
Derbyshire—Derby, Tuesday, Oct. 2e.
Yorkshire—Sheffield, Friday, Oct. 31.
Yorkshire—Wakefield, Monday, Nov. 3.
At the Town and County of Kingston-upon-HRI —Saturday,
Nov. 8.
Yorkshire—York and City, Tuesday, Nov. 11.
Yorkshire—Richmond, Friday, Nov. 14.
Durham—Durham, Saturday, Nov. 15.
Northumberland—Newcastle-upon-Tyne ini Town, Tuesday,
November 18.
CuMberland—Carlisle, Friday, November 21.
Westmorland—Appleby, Monday, November 24.
Westmorland—Kendal, same day.
Lancashire—Lancaster, Wednesday, November 26.
Lancashire—Preston, Thursday, December 4.
Lancashire—Liverpool, Friday, December 5.
Cheshire—Chester and City, Tuesday, December 9",

SOUTHERN CIRCUIT.
J. G. HARRIS, Esq., Commissioner.

Hampshire—Winchester, Monday, Oct. 27.
Hampshire—Town and County of Southampton, Tuesday, Oet. 28.
Wiltshire—Salisbury, Wednesday, Oct. 29.
Dorsetshire—Dorchester, Friday, Oct. 31.
Devonshire—Exeter and City, Monday, Nov. 3.
Devonshire—Plymouth, Wednesday, Nov. 5.
Cornwall—Bodmin, Friday, Nov. 7.
Somersetshire—Wells, Tuesday, Nov. 11.
Somersetshire—Bath, Thursday, Nov. 13.
Somersetshire—City of Bristol, Friday, Nov. 14.
Gloucestershire—Gloucester and City, Monday Nov. 17.
Monmouthshire—.Monmouth, Wednesday, November 19.
Herefordshire—Hereford, Thursday, November 20.
Worcestershire—Worcester and City, Saturday, November 22.
Oxfordshire—Oxford and City, Monday, November 24.
Berkshire—Reading, Wednesday, November 26.
At the City of Canterbury, Saturday, November 29.
Kent—Dover, Monday December 1.
Kent—Maidstone, Wednesday, December 3.
Sussex—Horsham, Friday, December 5.

MIDLAND CIRCUIT.
W. J. LAW, Esq., Commissioner.
Hertfordshire—Hertford, Wednesday, Nov. 5.
Essex—Chelmsford, Friday, Nov. 7.
Essex—Colchester, Saturday, Nov. 8.
Suffolk—lpswich, Monday, Nov. 10.
Norfolk—Yarmouth, Wednesday, Nov. 12.
Norfolk—Norwich and City, Thursday, Nov. 13.
Suffolk—Bury St. Edmunds, Saturday, Nov. 15.
Cambridgeshire—Cambridge Monday, Nov. 17.
Cambridgeshire—Ely, Tuesday, Nov. 18.
Norfolk—Lynn, Wednesday, Nov. 19.
Northamptonshire—Peterborough, Thursday, Nov. 20.
Leicestershire—Leicester, Friday, Nov. 21.
Shropshire—Shrewsbury, Monday, Nov. 24.
Staffordshire—Stafford, Wednesday, Nov. 26.
Warwickshire—Birmingham, Friday, Nov. 28.
At the City of Lichfield—Monday, Dec. 1.
At the City of Coventry—Tuesday, Dec. 2.
Warwickshire—Warwick, Wednesday, Dec. 3.
Northamptonshire—Northampton, Saturday, December 6.
Huntingdonshire—Huntingdon, Monday, December 8.
Bedfordshire—Bedford, Tuesday, December 9.
Buckinghamshire—Aylesbury, Wednesday, December 10.

WAR OFFICE, SEPT. 5.

Ist Regiment of Life Guards—Cornet and Sub-Lieut. G. Tom-
line to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Blackett, who retires; E.
N. Harvey, Gent., to be Cornet and Sub-Lieutenant, by purchase,
vice Tomline, Sept. 5.
2d Regiment of Life Guards—A. Knox, Gent., to be Cornet
and Sub-Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Marindin, who retires,
Sept. 5.
Ist Regiment of Foot—Lieut. G. R. Campsie, from half-pay
64th Foot, to be Lieutenant, vice W. Landreth, who exchanges,
Sept. 5.
6th Foot—Lieut. R. H. Tighe, from half-pay 60th Foot, to be
Lieutenant, vice Edward Wynyard Young, who exchanges, Sept. 5.
11th Foot—Brevet Lieut.-Colonel C. Bisshopp, from the 14th
Foot, to be Major, without purchase, vice Love, promoted in the
76th Foot, Sept. 6.
14th Foot—Capt. J. 13. Creagh, from the 81st Foot, to be
Captain, vice Boyle, appointed to the 85th Foot, Sept. 5 ; Lieut.
J. 31‘Dermott to be Captain, without purchase, vice Bisshopp,
promoted in the 11th Foot; Ensige H. M. F. Stirke to be Lieu-
tenant, vice M'Dermott ; Gentleman Cadet E. Archdall, from the
Royal Military College, to be Ensign, vice Stirke, Sept. 6.
16th Foot--Major A. G. Campbell to be Lieutenant-Colonel,
without purchase, vice Hook, deceased ; Capt. S. G. Carter to be
Major, vice Campbell ; Lieut. M. Smith to be C,aptain, vice Car-
ter ; Ensign W. A. Kirk to be Lieutenant, vice Smith, Feb: 8 ;
L. Hook, Dent. to be Ensign, vice Kirk, Sept. 5.
19th Foot—Lieut. J. Semple to be Captain, by purchase, vie*
Vignoles, who retires ; Ensign C. J. Freeman to be Lieutenant, by
purchase, vice Semple, Sept. 5.
22d Foot—Capt. J. 111'Mahon Kidd, from the 57th Foot, to be
Captain, vice T. Edwards, who retires upon half-pay 28th Foot,
receiving the difference, Sept. 5.
47th Foot—Gentleman Cadet W. W. Rooke, from the Royal
Military College, to he Ensign, without purchase, vice Atkinson,
deceased, Sept. 5.
57th Foot—Capt. A. Gregory, from half-pay 28th Foot, to be
Captain, paying the difference, vice Kidd, appointed to the 22d
Foot, Sept. 5.
73(1 Foot—R. C. Bamford, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase,
vice Douglas, who retires, Sept. 5.
76th Foot--Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel J. F. Love, from the
11th Foot, to be Lieutenant-Colonel, without purchase, vice Clarke,
deceased, Sept. 6.
81st Foot—Captain C. R. Scott, from half-pay, Royal Staff
Corps, to be Captain, vice Creagh, appointed to the 14th Foot,
Sept. 5.
85th Foot—Captain Hon. R. E. Boyle, from tilt, 14th root, to

be Captain, vice Hon. A. H. A. Cooper, who retires Upon tolfigl
Royal Staff Corps, Sept. 5.
86th Foot—Assistant-Surgeon J. Coghlan, from the 69tchF°°5t:
to be Surgeon, vice Cunningham, who retires upon half-puY, mt

Commission by the Lord Lietenant of the County of Dorset.
Dorset Regiment of Volunteer Yeomanry Cavalry. ,
Cornet H. F. Yeatman to be Lieutenant; F. Ito
Gent , Gent., to be Cornet, vice Yeatman, promoted,August

DECLARATIONS OF INSOLVENCY. -
CHARLES CANFER, builder, Cottage..grove, Canlberwit,
WILLIAM PROSSOR, sen., and WILLIAM PROS
jun., linen-drapers, Pitfield-street, Horton.
BANKRUPTS.
THOMAS SHADRAKE, Jun., coal-merchant, Hope-* ,r
Commercial-road, to surrender Sept. 12, at two, and Oct. 1701.
one, at the Court of Bankruptcy
i. Wells, York-terrace,
mercial-road East; Whitmore Basnghall-street, official assaire„
WILLIAM ORTON ATTREE, draper, Newbury, Bernok-
Sept. 11, at one, and Oct. 17, at eleven, at the Court of.o__
al"
ruptcy. ' Milne, Parry, Milne, and Morris, Temple ;Vinto
Basinghall-street, official assignee. lbiret
SAMUEL WALKER, ironmaster, Gospel Oak, Stab 40
„,..
Sept. 22, at ten, and Oct. 17, at three, at the Lion Inn, "pi.
hampton. Holyoake and Robinson, Wolverhampton; Cape",
mond-buildings, Gray's Inn, London.
CHARLS INGRAM, currier, Salisbury, Sept. 8, at 5.c
Oct. 17, at eleven, at the Lion Inn, Salisbury. Newton, °°
square, Gray's Inn, London y
in Housman, Salisbury. e 2 sari
GEORGE BENSON, nkeeper, Liverpool, Sce' ur" aiker,
Oct. 17, at one, at the Clarendon-rooms, Liverpool.
Liverpool; Perkins and Co., London. Corn'
FRANCIS BONNAFFE, merchant, St. Michael's-alleYt tef.
hill, Sept. 26, and Oct. 17, at twelve, at the Court of Bankrlol,,
Swain, Stevens, and Co., Frederick's-place, Old Jewry;

official assigneeA, St. Swithin's-lane, Lonibard-street. street.
JOSHUA NDREWS, stock -broker, Threadneedle'nok.
Sept. 22, at twelve, and Oct. 17, at eleven, at the Court of v.
i ruptcy. Rowlinson and Co., Southampton-buildngs,
chance'.
lane ; Graham, official assignee, Copthall-buildings; see'
CHARLES WINN, blank-tray-maker, Birmingham, 00.
17 and Oct. 17, at two, at the Clarendon Hotel, Birroing
Norton and Chaplin, Gray's Inn-square, London ; Harrisous
mingham.

DIVIDENDS. 0
J. and W. Jackson, stationers, Strand, Sept. 26, at elnso.
the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Johnson, J. Statham, and T. Jtif,
111,— Sept. 26, st

son, millers, Twickett's Mills, Northamptonshire, Sept
past ten, at the Court of Bankruptcy—P. Biggs, auctioneer, utio
cester-terrace, Cannon-street-road, Sept. 26, at half-imitates.
at the Court of Bankruptcy—W. Gilpin, army-clothier, v"'"
street, Strand, Sept. 26, at ten, at the Court of Bankruptst.,4
Sharpe, merchant, Lincoln, Sept. 30, at eleven, at the city n,
Hotel, Lincoln—P. Sainty, shipwright, Wivenhoe, Essex, °Clr,
at eleven, at the Castle Inn, Colchester—S. Stevens, bte",,;
Brierley Hill, King's Swinford, Staffordshire, Sept. 27, at eiefirer,
at Dee's Royal Hotel, Birmingham—W. Hill, nail-manufattel,
' Cradley, Worcestershire, Oct. 8, at eleven, at the Talbotat
Stourbridge—R. A. West, draper, Leeds, Oct. 11, at elev%r,
the Commissioners' Rooms, Manchester—C. Fox, artists'-0w,4,
11,00..•
man, Manchester, Oct. 2, at ten, at the Commissioners the
Manchester—J. Wigan, scrivener, Bristol, Sept. 26, at two, a'
Commercial Rooms, Bristol.

CERTIFICATES—Sxm 26. tailor"
T. Pinn, tailor, 'Great Pulteney-street, Golden-squarSl,7jllh
J. Battyll, common-brewer, Fulbourn, Cambridgeshire--7 •
builder, Exeter--W. H. Gibson, hatter, Liverpool.
PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. street
W. H. Johnson and F. G. Moore, chemists, Bishop,gste--
Without—R. Elliot and J. Page, carriers, Norwich—J. Per.„rYa
J. Griffin, flour machine-manufacturers, Liverpool—W. "-drug'
Mellor, mercers, Leek, Staffordshire--J. and J. Shiprnao, Glow'
gists—J. Dunn, jun., and J. Reed, attorneys, Woodchester, i,%or'
cestershire—J. and T. Pettipher, tea-dealers, Bedwardile' Hart'
cestershire—A. Greenslade and 60., seedsmen, Bristol-7; f;
ley and W. Mills, woollen-carders, Handersfield, Lancasnl i'l
C. Boorne and Co., retail hatters, Regent-street—J. Whee
W. Hams, timber-benders, Herron's-yard, WestminsterloaFtoper
Ewen and J. Earwaker, farmers, Wield, Southampton---„„o•oarsh
and G. Rathbone, painters, Wardour-street, Soho—B. 7',1 CO,
jun., and Co., Manchester, silk-manufacturers— G. Lewis 01, 01
merchants, Frederick's-place, Old Jewry—W. A. Grooo7°
Co., St. John's, New Brunswick.

SCOTCH .
WILLIAM THOMSON, writer, SeptSEQUESTRATION. 11 and Oct. 3, astfl'
at Kirkland's Inn, Kinross.

LONDON' MARKETS.

• 1
F BREAD. b.
The highest price of BreadPRICE in the Metropolis is fid. for the 4 ueP
There are others who sell from a half-penny to three half-Pence
that rate.