The Sun.
London, England, 1833-10-14 00:00:00

pILAPERIENT FAMILY
Ls,
,iii;tgiddi4 a Most excellent Medicine for Bile, Indiges-
!kii:' and of the Head, Piles, Dropsical Com-
il)tlitgllBoflierarein a considerable Degr.ee a preventive of
.h. they diseases. 'Their composition is truly excel-
Nt"ittion :,t4it contain any antimonial or mercurial
or cttr:°.atever, and do not require the least confine-
t4eg("otl ~,tl°l4 of diet (moderate exercise promotes
tt,,, ho effects); they seldom operate until ten or
14; wor' after taken, and then very gently ; they
t'o Ptiops tg, purify the humours, and evacuate all foul
tC/‘•ing alk‘sitereby so many diseases are produced; by
"u't, they cause the food pass its
rite se par tic ions, to to
°E heara, becoming a good restorative and preser-
, 'll'4 trlii `h to both sexes, and to those of a costive
oYsaluab!e treasure. Also, SNOOK'S ITC-
tilass, r
,COUGH PILLS, for Coughs, Colds,
its as 40"ds' Shortness of Breath. It is well known that
' att Colds (if
,not soon removed) are, in many
ttoeh tn ' pactswith considerable d oer • for the removal
,ittitittitlepded:ral or Cough hPiallns'are' with confidence
sped"' an excellent medicine, and in most cases
tl,."„stheir • A single box will be a sufficient trial
lEET,,"d effects. SNOOK'S DENTIFRICE
pills " and GUMS.
)I're sold in Boxes, at ls. lid. and 2s. 9il.
etaifrice in Boxes, at Is. I id. and 2s. each.

i Apo --"...............,------
,4 t IliEc A , 9
'1 n who -411 Es HALL.—Names of
t d certificates
Otitii6_4l.. the Court of Examiners Fran e
Allen,
gentle-
Lei•
ire. iulon on Thursday last :—Richard
li,kl;este7'.rY,Bart!tf, Kingston, Berks ;
'7,0, Pet ' k'rantis A. B. Bonny, Bren . ;
tford Robert
John Bennett,
l?'ltitl; Perih'r°ilgh ; Henry Acheson Crozier, Tstnes:
yhltptliirn t'toderck, Davenport, Egham, Surrey ; Edwardjiin
vgli; ~,n7 Bedworth, Warwick ; William e.? '
9'
11,,) Staft, "otnas Lloyd, London ; John Moseley, tsur, -
filtwtll Steven David Morgan, Llandilo ; Thomas
ii',,,4lheria,,'",‘:ens7 Barnstable • William Saul, Green Rocs,
st. 117-", ; William Stan'hope Taylor; Jonathan G.
litik4t", nk,ar Rotherham ; Francis Welch, Taunton.
Ittt,, titiii, ISt! AIUSEUM.—.A new room has been
411'41 fi,i- and finished at the British Museum, on the
),lieis „-f?", oPposite the passage leading from the old
is i... a4tiquitits to the late additional gallery. This
tto ended to be a pro riated to Egyptian antiqui.
.',kl' 4.4 ;I:dhioh, bouPgit aPt.Sitherhy's sale some time
t,t ' lef,„ 'n an adjoining apartment. The new
\i'd fro " and of a moderate length and breadth,
'l,t ti, . 01 41,0Ve t 0 show the figures to be deposited
,'ita •bretter advant Near the statue of Sir Joseph
~Sl[,a)it'4 the „„aneeatg"
be Museum, is now a fine One
tY'lttPiillre' l'irnila; to() tthat which is in the vestibule of
etteatre.

CHAR GE OF FELONY AGAINST MR.
REEVE.
Mr. Reeve attended on Wednesday, accompanied
by his Solicitor, to meet the serious charge against
him, and Mr. Ashurst, the Solicitor to the relatives
of the drowned and plundered persons, proceeded
to question him.
Mr. AsHuusT—Have you disclosed to the Ma-
tristrates in your statement of yesterday the whole
of the property which came into your possession ?
Mr. Reeve—Every thing.
Mr. ASHURST—WiII you state whether the reti-
cule be! nging to Mrs. Pyne, to which you referred
yesterday, was in any way attached to her person.
Mr. Reeve—lt lay upon her bosom very visible,
attached to a small piece of white tape. I think
it was fastened to her side. I merely untied it in
the way I untie the tape now before me.
Mr. ASHURST—Did you find it was so fastened
to her as that you could not remove it whout inter-
fering with part of her dress ?
Mr. Reeve—l did not discompose her so as to
throw open any part of her person. It was merely
tied to her, and came away without any force.
Mr. ASHURST—WiII you state from the persons
of which of the ladies you took the rings ?
Mr. Reeve—There was a black ring on the per-
son of a lady who I understand to be Miss Roche;
that I took from her finger.
Mr. ASHURST—Was that as the body lay upon
the deck ?
Mr. Reeve—l think it was as the body was
being taken up through the skylight. That was the
only ring I took from the person of Miss Roche.
Mr. ASHURST—WiII you state what rings or or-
naments you took from the person of Mrs. Pyne ?
Mr. Reeve—l mentioned to Mr. Pyne that I had
taken a stout ring from the finger of Mrs Pyne, and
a pair of large earrings from her ears; that was all
I took from her.
Mr. ASHURST—Did you move ear-rings or finger-
rings from the body or bodies of any other lady or
ladies ?
Mr. Reeve —I can't charge my memory with re-
moving any more. The other rings either came
from the bodies or were put into my hands.
Mr. ASHURST—Was there an anxiety on the
part of the pet sons on board to get the bodies up,
and pay every proper attention to them ?
Mr. Reeve—l should say there was. I saw no
disposition on the part of the persons on board to
rob, or thieve, or conceal anything ; and the people
on board were as well conducted under these cii cum-
stances as I could wish them to be. I believe I
stated before that my reasons for taking those rings
were from stories I had heard. I took charge of
them under the impression I was acting for the Lord
of the Manor, to protect what property I could.
Mr. ASHURST—Can you reconcile your statement
as to the disposition of the people, their character
and conduct, on board, with the supposed necessity,
of stripping the persons of the ladies of their orna-
ments the moment they were taken from the water ?
Mr. Reeve—Nothing but the tales I had heard,
and the cruel treatment to the bodies washed ashore
induced me. I took charge of them as relics for the
relations.
M. ASHURST—Was this in the forenoon and in
broad day-light ?
Mr. Reeve—lt was.
Mr. ASHURsT—Were not the waggons able to
get close to the vessel, anti were not the bodies
handed directly into the waggons and conveyed on
shore to Brancaster Church.
Mr. Reeve—Yes, and each body was placed in
blankets and covered up.
Mr. ASHURST—That being so, and the people
being well behaved and honest, do you not consider
that whatever trinkets or other property were on the
persons of the ladies could have been safely con-
veyed on shore until the usual attention paid to the
bodies of dead persons had been given by persons of
their own sex ?
Mr. Reeve—Probably they might.
Mr. Reeve's Solicitor—Were there not men of
all characters and descriptions on board the vessel?
Mr. Reeve—Certainly there might have been.
Mr. ASHURST—Can you name the gentleman who
asked you first to open the reticule when you
took it ?
Mr. Reeve—l think Mr. Sharp was standing by.
Mr. ASHURST—Did not Mr. Mengay also apply
for it ?
Mr. Reeve—Yes, he did.
Mr. AsnutsT—Your attention being thus called
to the contents of that reticule, did it not occur to
you as desirable that it should be opened in tile pre-
sence of a third person ?
Mr. Reeve—lt certainly did not occur to me at
time moment.
Mr. ASHURST—Did you observe that the ear
from which you moved the first ear-ring commenced
blesding before you moved the second ?
Mr. Reeve—No; that is one of those falsehoods
that have been reported.
Mr. ASHURST—Is it not the fact that, with your
anxiety to serve and assist them, you staid on board
the vessel till the tide came in, and you could stay
no longer?
Mr. Reeve—Of course I staid on board to watch
and see that things were going on right.
Mr. AstivitsT—You gave no aid to time passen-
gers on shore personally, nor attended the bodies of
the deceased after you had secured the property ?
Mr. Reeve—When I was on shore I was on
horseback. I aided the passengers only up to the
time of their quitting the vessel, and I then staid to
see that nothing wrong was done. I used very
great exertion to keep people off the vessel, and
from coming on board.
Mr. AsHunsT—Did you not know that Mr. Mengay
and the Preventive Service men were on board, and
a constable placed at the gangway ?
Mr. Reeve—Yes.
Mr. ASIIURST—It is stated that you were seen
riding on horseback from the vessel to the shore
with a box, acid that you were afterwards seen rid-
ing back without it. Es that true ?
Mr. Reeve—Certainly not. I am quite clear
that there is no foundation for that statement.
Mr. AsttunsT--And is your recollection as to
property which came into your possession sufficiently
clear to enable you to state that you had no other
property, articles, and things than those you have
stated ?
Mr. Reeve—l can lay my hand on my heart and
say so.
Mr. ASHURST—Did you deliver up the whole of
the letters and papers which you found in the reti-
cule, or elsewhere, to time Captain, in the presence
of Mr. Holloway and other gentlemen ?
Mr. Reeve—Yes, every thing. I took the re-
ceipt now produced from the Captain, and requested
the gentlemen who have subscribed it to certify the
fact. That is certified by six persons.
Mr. ASHURST—Can you reconcile the caution
You observed in taking a receipt with six witnesses
to what you delivered up, and the want of care in
not requiring any person to witness the opening of
the reticule ?
Mr. Reeve—There I certainly plead guilty. It
was an omission.
Mr. ASHURST—WiII you compare the nine 5/.
notes now produced with your memorandum made
at the time, and say whether they are the same ?
Mr. Reeve—l have not a doubt about it.
Mr. ASHURST—Assuming that the passengers
were drowned at eight in the morning, and, as