The Sun.
London, England, 1851-11-20 00:00:00

2 0 0
123 7 1

Total ... ... ... £l5B lb 3
lITEIM-B OATS.

... ... £167 17 9
18 6 10

Passengers •••
Parcels, H. C. and D. ••• D.

Total ... ... ... £lB6 4 7
Scorrisn CENTRAL RAlLWAT.—Traffic for the Week
ending Nov. 16, 1851 :
Passengers (8,727), parcels, horses,
and carriages ... ... ... £892 11 2
Goods, cattle, &c.... ... ... 729 6 9

Total .. .. 1,621 17 11
Corresponding week in last year... 1,660 9 9
Perth, Nov. 19, 1851.

MONEY MARKET.—The quotation of gold at
Paris is at about par (according to the new tariff ), which,
at the English Mint price of 31. 17s. 10Id. per ounce for
standard gold, gives an exchange of 25.17 ; and the ex-
change at Paris on London at short being 25.15, it follows
that gold is about 0.08 per cent. dearer in London than in
Paris. By advices from Hamburgh the price of gold
is 430 per mark, which, at the English Mint price of
3/. 17s. loid. per ounce for standard gold, gives an exchange
of 13.7 i ; and the exchange at Hamburgh on London at
short being 13.81, it follows that gold is 0.58 per cent.
dearer in Londoa than in Hamburgh. The course of ex-
change at New York on London for bills at GO days' sight is
liti per cent., and the par of exchange between England
and America being 109 23-40 per cent., it follows that the
exchange is nominally 0.67 per cent. in favour of England ;
and, after making allowance for difference of interest and
charges of transport, the present rate leaves a small profit in
the importation of gold from the United States.
goanedn
preach the dis
to disobedience A RESPONSE.—The Star Spangled Banner says
that, not long since, in South Carolina, a clergyman who
was preachingsnded to
Nncienevoiftejso,neaxhclwahimenedcion a
com-
manded
of thunder, that passed through the congregation like
m
an electric shock, and are there any Jonahs here?" There
was a negro present whose name was Jonah, who, thinking
himself called on, immediately arose, and turning up his
white eye, with his broadest grin, replied, " Here be one,
Massa.'

~ ;..~

Name of Company.

4 8. d.
Stock.
Stock.
100 0 0
Stock.

Stock.

b 0 0 0

50 0 0

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, Nov. 19.
(Before Mr. Commissioner FONBLAINQUE.)
IN RE MURRAY.

The bankrupt, J. Murray, woollen-warehouseman,
Gresham-street, applied for his certificate. The balance-
sheet, from Jan. 1, 1850, to July 8, 1851, shows the
following :—Creditors unsecured, 6,0251.; ditto hold-
ing security, 3,425/. ; liabilities, 7,1971. ; grant of
life policy, 542/. ; profits, 1,726/. ; cash, 21/. ,
debtors, good, 7201.; doubtful, 1411.; property to
realize, 1,759/. ; property claimed, 2951.; property
in the hands of creditors, 2,900/. ; trade expenses,
2,396/. ; personal expenses, 849/. ; losses, 1,271/. ;
deficiency, Jan. 1., 1850. 1,3221.
Mr. Lawrence supported the bankrupt.
Mr. LINYLATER, for the assignees, offered no op..
position, but wished to examine the bankrupt on
behalf of Messrs. Mallinson, who were creditors, re-
lative to the disposal of some goods.

The bankrupt, upon being 'xamioed by Mr. Link-
later, said he had purchased goods of Messrs. Mallis-
son on the 20th of May. These goods were sold in
the regular course of business ; none of them were
pawned. In fancy goods they were obliged to make
sacrifices at the end of a season. It was certainly
untrue that he had pawned goods. The largest
parcel was sold to Parkins, of Chespside. He un-
derstood they were pledged by Parkins. He (Par-
kins) was since a bankrupt. He had never pledged
or undersold goods himself. The goods sold to Mr.
Parkins were invoiced in the ordinary way, and were
sold at an advance o❑ the cost price.
Mr. LINKLATER here observed that he had no evi-
dence to show the improper parting with goods, and
left the case to his Honour.

The bankrupt (to the Commissioner)—Parkins
owed him about 8001.

Mr. LAWRANCE, in reply to the Commissioner, ex-
plained some bill transactions with Vevers, which he
submitted could not be called accommodation bills,
and called his Honour's attention to the fact that the
bankrupt had not preferred family to others of his
trade creditors. The assignees offered no opposition.
There had been no pledging of goods proved against
the bankrupt ; he had, in fact, never pledged goods
in his life, and never sold goods under cost price, ex-
cept when they had become depreciated by change of
fashion, which ninety-nine out of a hundred who
came into that court could not say. With regard
also to the bookkeeping, there was this fact strong in
the bankrupt's favour, that as the bankruptcy ap•
proached the bookkeeping became better. With re-
gard to his transactions with Vevers, they could only
be called incautious, and he (Mr. Lawrence) trusted
that the Court would grant a first class certificate.
The COMMISSIONER said he id not think that any
weight could be attached to the charge of having
pledged or having sold under cost price the goods
which were supplied by the opposing creditors, though
at the same time he should intimate his opinion that
his transaction with Parkins was not a prudent one,
and it had resultod in a heavy loss. He (the Com-
missioner) was prepared to give the bankrupt credit
for honesty of intention, but he had been both with
regard to Parkins and Vevers rash and improvident ;
the result was shown by the figures before him.
Having a deficiency of 1,3001. in January, 1850, it
did not matter whether it was due to trade creditors
or to family creditors ; he was 1,3001. behind the
world. His Honour, after looking through the
figures on the balance-sheet, and observing that the
profits were 1,7001. and the trade expenses 2,3001.,
said that under the circumstances, although he gave
the bankrupt credit for honesty of intention and for
having recently kept his books well, he could not see
that the bankruptcy was attributable to unavoidable
loss and misfortune ; and he could not give a certifi-
cate higher than one of the third class.

MIDDLESEX SESSIONS.

(Before Mr. WITHAM, Deputy• Judge, and a Bench

of Magistrates, at Clerkenwell.)
Yesterday James Norman was indicted, charged
with having unlawfully sold certain indecent and ob-
scene prints and publications.
Mr. Clarkson appeared for the prosecution.
The defendant pleaded Guilty, and urged in miti-
gation of punishment that he had a wife and family,
and an aged mother, who was blind, dependent upon
him for their support.
Mr. CLARKSON was sorry to have to press upon the
attention of the Court that the defendant did not stand
simply in the position of a circulator of these filthy
publications among individuals, but was a wholesale
dealer, furnishing these things to parties who were con-
nected with the shipping interest at and about Wap-
ping and Ratcliffe. That fact alone was sufficient
ground for the Society for the Suppression of Tice,
for whom he appeared, not joining in the appeal for
mercy which had been made by the defendant.
The COURT sentenced the defendant to imprison-
ment and hard labour for twelve months.

Alborough Richardson Davis, described as a wine
merchant, carrying on business in Bow-lane, Cheap-
side, and having a private residence at Harrow, sur-
rendered to take his trial on an indictment, charging
him with having stolen a pony and chaise, of the value
of 401., the property of James Henry Edwards.
Mr. Clarkson conducted the case for the prosecu-
tion, and Mr. Parry defended the prisoner.
The prosecutor deposed that he is a licensed vic-
tualler, and keeps the Royal Yacht public-house in
Stanhope-street, Clare-market. He said—On the
18th of October the prisoner, with whom I was ac-
quainted, called upon me in the early part of the day,
accompanied by a person named Boyes. I did not
know Boyes until that time. They came in a pony
chaise—the hour was between nine and ten in the
morning. I was upstairs when they called, and on
being informed by the bar boy that they were below,
I came down stairs. I found Davis standing in front
of the bar, and Boyes was in the parlour. Davis
asked me to lend him some money on some dock
transfers for wine. I asked him to let me see them,
and he called Boyes from the parlour, and told him to
show me the transfers which he had in his pocket. I
looked at them and returned them to him, and said I
could not advance money upon them, as he might go
outside the house and make a transfer to somebody
else. He said he must have money ; the transfers
were worth 1951., and he must get some money to re•
lease them from Mr. Boyes, who held them as secu-
rity for an overdue acceptance of 28/. 103. He said
he was in a very bad state for want of money, and
showed me some duplicates of watches. He then
asked me to lend him some money on a pony and
chaise, which were outside. I refused to do so,
and he then asked me to buy the pony and chaise.
I said I would. He went into a room and agreed
that I was to buy them for 401. I was about to write
a cheque for the amount when he said that would not
do, as he wanted to pay Boyes and get the transfers.
I had not sufficient cash in the house, but I saw Mr.
Wheeler, a friend of mine, in the parlour, and I asked
him to lend me the money. He lent me two 101.
notes and 12 sovereigns, and I put eight sovereigns
to them and paid the 401. to Davis. I requested Mr.
Wheeler to be a witness to the transaction, which he
was. Wheeler went with me into the parlour and
saw me pay the money. I said, " Now, Davis, the
pony and chaise belong to me," to which he replied,
" Certainly they do." I then went out and got into
the chaise, and Davis followed me out of the house
and got in too. As I was driving towards Elliott's
livery stables in Drury-lane, through Newcastle-
street, the prisoner asked me to purchase some of the
wine the transfers related to. I said I would if it
suited me. He said, Let us drive down to the docks
and see the wine. I said I would not do that, but
that I would go with him after I had put the pony
and phaeton up at the stable. I went to the stable,
gave the pony and phaeton into the charge of the
ostler, told him it was my property, and to take care
of it. We then took a cab and went to the
docks, where the clerk said they bad no such
wine as that referred to in the transfers. I
left the prisoner, got into a cab, and returned. I
called at the stable ; the pony and chaise were safe.
I then went home. Afterwards the foreman to Mr.
Elliott, the stable-keeper, called at my house, and
from what he told me I went to the stable. When I
got there I found the prisoner with two other persons,
one was an attorney's clerk. I asked them what they
wanted. Davis said, he wanted his pony and chaise
to drive his friends down into the country. I said to
him, " You know they do not belong to you ; you
know I have bought them of you." He said, " You
have got no receipt." I said I had a witness. I did
not have a receipt, but I had offered to pay him by a
cheque. I said, " If any of you dare to take the pony
and chaise away, I shall give you into custody. '
Upon that they went away, and I went home. I got
hems about half.past six, and in half an hour after-
wards Davis and Webb came to my house. The
former asked for a glass of ale, which I refused to
serve him with. He then said he wanted to have a
little private talk with me, but I refused. I after-
wards said I would have as much private talk with
him as he pleased, as Mr. Gay, my attorney, was then
present. There were present, Davis, Gay, Webb,
myself, and two others. In the course of what was
said Davis told me he had come to ask for the pony and
chaise. I said I would not give them to him. Webb then
said, " They do not belong to you." Davis said, " You
took an lOU for the money," and I said I had had too
many of his I 0 U's. I did not think it worth while to
make any other answer to what Davis said. I had
not taken an I 0 U for the 401. I walked out of the
room and went down stairs. On the 2Gth of October
I drove in the phaeton to my father's in Elizabeth-
street, Hackney-road. When I got there I threw the
cloth over the pony and went into the house. As I
was talking with my father at the front parlour win-
dow I saw Davis run up to the phaeton, jump in, and
drive off as fast he could. I ran out and called " Stop
thief," but the prisoner's men stopped me and held
me by the arms. Several others, about a dozen, ran
up, and said " Knock the -- down." Two cabs came
up, and they got into them and drove off after the
phaeton. It would have been useless for me to follow,

as the phaeton was driven so rapidly. I gate information
to the police-stations, and Davis was apprehended on the
Monday. The case was taken before a megistratt-,
who ordered a remand. When the next examination
took place another magistrate was sitting, and he dis-
missed the case, saying it was one of great suspicion,
and recommended me to indict at the sessions.

The prosecutor was submitted to a rigid cross-
examination by Mr. Parry, but his testimony was un-
shaken as to this particular transaction.
Mr. Wheeler, who had lent the money to the pro-
secutor to pay the prisoner, proved that fact, and had
served him under a writ in an action of trover, in
consequence of his refusal to comply therewith, before
he took possession of the property.
Mr. PARRY, for the prisoner, [Omitted that the
prosecutor had correctly stated the circumstances
under which Davis took the pony and chaise from
Elizabeth-street, and proceeded to urge upon the jury
that the prisoner had acted under the bond fide belief
that he had not parted absolutely with the property to
Edwards, and that he had a right to act in the way he
had done. Ile had never contemplated the commission
of a felony—to rob Mr. Edwards of that to which he
(the prisoner) could not by possibility have any kind
of claim or title, but he had acted under the honest
impression that the law justified him in taking the
steps he had resorted to to obtain back his property.
The prisoner could not answer p,rsionally the state-
ment of the prosecutor as to what passed between them
privately about the matter, and the Learned Counsel
contended that, considering the conduct of the prose-
cutor and the prisoner throughout the transaction, it
was not beyond the possibility of
.question that the
pony and phaeton were left as security for a loan, and
that when the prisoner found Mr. Edwards was claiming
the property as having been sold to him, he had taken
these measures to obtain back what clearly had been
his own ; and, considering the businesslike habits of
Mr.. Edwards, it certainly was an extraordinary fact
that he had not taken the precaution to have a receipt
for the money if it were a sale.

The Learned JUDQE having summed up the evidence,
The jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty, adding
that it was their opinion the prisoner had not acted
with a felonious intent.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
BOW-STREET.

George Turner, a porter, i❑ the employ of Mr. G.
Oldham, currier, of Long-acre, was charged with
stealing a quantity of leather, and George Mills, a
hawker, was charged with receiving the property
knowing it to have been stolen.
The prosecutor had missed about 401. worth of
leather during the past six months, but only lately
had occasion to suspect the prisoner, who had been
intrusted with the care of the premises, and possessed
the entire confidence of his employer. A quantity
of the missing leather was traced to the shop of a
dealer named Cannon, in Seven Dials, who had pur-
chased it of Mills, at whose house some of the re-
maining portions were afterwards discovered. The
prisoner Turner, on being taxed with the theft, made
a confession to his employer, and attributed his pro-
pensity to steal to the habits of drinking and betting
at public-houses, by which he had become greatly
involved.

Mills, in his defence, stated that the prisoner
Turner always represented the pieces of leather as
"job lots," to which he became entitled as perquisites.
It was proved that the prisoners were continually
drinking together.
Mr. HENRY committed them both for trial.
LAMBETH.

Abraham &carton, a young man, servant to Mr.
Robinson, wholesale confectioner in the Dover-road,
was charged with administering some narcotic drug
to the complainant, Harriet Davis, at a public-house
in Lambeth.

The complainant, a well-dressed, rather good-
looking young woman, who gave her evidence under
strongly-excited feelings, deposed that she worked at
the same place with the prisoner, and, on his invita-
tion, met him on Sunday evening at five o'clock,
when, at his request, she went into a public-house,
where she had a glass of gin and cloves. From this
public-house they went to the lodging of a young
woman with whom the prisoner kept company, and,
finding she was not at home, they went to another
public• house, where she had another glass of gin and
cloves, and next went to the prisoner's lodgings,
where they had some tea. They subsequently went
to a public-house near the Westminster-road, and
there she became perfectly unconscious and lost al!
recollection of what happened to her from that time
until about six o'clock on Monday morning, when she
found herself in bed with the prisoner. On discover-
ing her situation she at once jumped out of bed and
made the best of her way to the residence of her
father, and from that time to the present had suffered
considerably from severe bruises on her side and dif-
ferent parts of her body. She also suffered, and was
still suffering, from internal affection such as she never
before experienced. _

The father and married sister of the complainant
deposed to her coming home shortly after six o'clock
on Monday in a dreadful state of affliction, and suf-
fering considerably from great apparent pain of body
and mind. She then stated that the prisoner had taken
her to a public-house, where they had had two glasses
of gin-and water, and though she had not taken so
much as would affect her in an ordinary way, she
lost her senses, and found herself in bed with a young
man on the following morning. She alao said that
some drug must have been put into the drink, or the
quantity she had taken could not have any such effect
on her.

Police constable 143 M said that on that afternoon
he took the prisoner into custody at his master's, on a
charge of administering some narcotic drug to the
complainant, and, on telling him the
nature of the
charge, he (the prisoner) stoutly denied it. He ad-
mitted having been into three or four public-houses
with the complainant, and said she became so over-
come that he bad been obliged to take a bed for her
at a coffee-house, not knowing where to take her to
her home. He (the prisoner), denied having mixed
anything in the drink taken by the young woman.
James Brown, the proprietor of a coffee-house in
Gibson-street, Lambeth, said that, about half-past
eleven o'clock on Sunday night the prisoner came to
his house and asked if he could accommodate himself
and his wife with a bed for the night. He replied that
he could, and soon after the complainant was assisted
into the house and upstairs by the prisoner and another
young man. Believing the young woman to be tipsy
he (witness) remarked that, had he seen her before,
he should not have let the prisoner the bed. After
they went upstairs the complainant, was making a loud
moaning noise, and saying " Oh, my side ; oh, my
my side ;" upon which he went upstairs, and, knock-
ing at the door, said he could not allow such a noise,
as it disturbed the other persons in the house. After
this he became quiet, and she heard nothing more
about them until six o'clock on the following morning,
when the prisoner came down stairs and said he had
no money to pay for the bed, but should leave h's
watch till he should call in the course of the day. He
then returned upstairs, and soon came down again
with the complainant, whom he wished to take some
breakfast, but she refused.
The prisoner, in reply to the charge, said that the
fact was that the complainant got so tipsy as to be
unable to walk home, and he, not knowing where she
lived, took a bed for her for the night, and remained
with her, but slept outside the bedclothes.
Mr. ELLIOTT (to the complainant)—ls that true ?
Complainant—There was so little clothes on the
bed, that I can scarcely say whether he was under or
over them.

Mr. ELLIOTT—Had you your clothes on or off?
Complainant—I had them on, your worship.
Mr. ELLIOTT—What situation did you find the
prisoner in when you awoke, as you stated, on the
Monday morning ? Complainant—He had one arm
under my neck and the other over me, and when I
called out and said, " Good God, what place is this,
where am I?" he desired ma to be quiet ; but I
could not, and got out of bed.
Mr. ELLIOTT observed, that by the surgeon's certi-
ficate it did not appear that any violence had been
committed towards the complainant—a circumstance
most fortunate for the prisoner. There could be no
doubt, however, that he (the prisoner) had taken a
very scandalous advantage of the young woman by
making her tipsy and taking her to sleep with him.
Had his own story keen true, that he had taken a bed
for her protection, there was no necessity for his
sleeping there himself. There was no proof, however,
that he had administered any drug, and therefore that
part of the charge must fall to the ground; bat there
could be no doubt that he had been guilty of an as-
sault, and for this he must pay a fine of 51., or be
imprisoned for one month.
7'HAMES.

Robert Sheen, a police-constable of the K division,
No. 82, appeared in his uniform before Mr. Yardley,
to show cause why he should not be adjudged the
father of an illegitimate child.
Fanny Watson, a well-dressed and very prepos-
sessing young woman, stated that she lived at No. 2,
New-alley, Three-colt-lane, Limehouse, and that her
child, which she produced, was born on the 2d of
September last, and the defendant was the father of
it. She had known the defendant four years, but
first became more familiarly acquainted with him two
years ago, when they were both present at the fune-
ral of a policeman named Harvey. On that occasion
he urged her to meet him on his beat, and she had
very frequently done so. About a year ago he first
seduced her, and the intercourse had frequently been
renewed since. She was quite certain Sheen was the
father of her child. She never allowed any other
man to take liberties with her.
In cross-examination by Mr. Pelham for the de-
fendant, the complainant said her aunt had seen her
meet the defendant and speak to him. On that occa-
sion she walked with him the whole extent of his beat
as far as Poplar Church.
Mr. YAzuour said, that by a recent Act of Far'

----------------------------
liament the complainant could call on the defendant
to be examined on oath. c•,
The Complainant—Yes, if you please, "r. II
knows he is the father of my child. , Me?
Mr. YARDLEY—Now, do you understandbo
you rag 0
Corroborative evidence must be given.
all, but 5,
enabled to do without his testimony at
ma, you e, have rative proof froro
mouythif of thelik defendant.corro Youbo had better think 01,
'
and whether it will be better to call him or Dote. in.
Mr. Pelham—Do you think, Sir, it was :,
of
tended to have corroborative testimony, in cas
bas'ardy, from the mouth of the defendant? , ~,ate
Mr. YARDLEY—I don't know what the Leglsfosa
intended, but I will read the clause of the 14tn of
15th Victoria, "An Act to amend the Law,„ref
Evidence"—" On the trial of any issue joie
ati-sivg
any matter, or on any information or inquirY col
in any suit, action, or other proceedings in
B°Y cby
of justice, or before any person having by
111:aclrel.
consent of parties authority to hear, receive,
eross
amine evidence, the parties thereto, and tbegt, pro.
in whose behalf any such suit, action, or °, 001:4
ceedings may be brought, or defended, end ego.
as hereinafter excepted, be competent dl, by de'
pellable to give evidence, either viva voce ° art, cn
position, according to the practice of the °id sait,
behalf of either or any of the parties to the 55 ntioot
action, or other proceeding." He found the ei_eioioe
to be in cases of persons charged with the conri,bable
of any indictable offence, or any offence Pan e%cer
on summary conviction. There was ale°_ai. This
tiou in cases of adultery, and breaches 0 4,rtlis case
of marriage tried in the superior courts. ''
did not come within the exceptions at ail. „deli*
Mr. Pelham—Punishable on summary n?ctieat
Is not this in the nature of a sumraary Onvilled or°
Mr. YARDLEY thought not. Ile Was ea
to make an order, not to convict. ova dir
Mr. Pelham said, if an order was made
obeyed the defendant could be sent to prisooe.eog to
Mr. YARDLEY said this was only a Pro Fog'
obtain an order, and if he made one, 30" ! dictole°4
man disobeyed it, he would be liable to salt was 0°
and would come within the exception. f s muses
indictable offence to disobey the ordefr,end to Prian°
trate. The defendant could be cororoi,t'vation• s
summarily for disobeying an order of i''''
oc" eedieg ' ,
showof
an
illegitimate
Mr. Pelham—ls not this a criminal Pr a bere ii
Mr. YARDLEY—No ;he is stuntooned to fathe,,
cause why hech
ishouldchild,
not be adjudge. ill wittier
under the new law. He is now charged Wid sot beHi
dictable offence. I don't see why this 5°11,4 to lilef
long to a class of cases where it is tiece°s°'ire 00 '
truth, nor can the new law be apPlied n3° (I
coiled, 610
than to cases of this nature. D
and he is a cooVeleitb so iv'
The aunt of the complainant was thenbe policlei
deposed that she had seen her neice and t tto e t too
walking together on his beat. and
laseptbi store
so
were walking together was about silt Di tor °lot,
the child was born. She never saw, 9°21 rall_li r
walking with her niece, who was ALI"' stbs rdcbe
tached to Sheen. One night she went toop; 1111;eot
man and said Fanny wanted to speak to t 00 "tip
said, " Very well ;" and the comploilaside by
away with him, and she saw them wli'l oolv
for a considerable distance. ; tif °replied'
Mr. YARDLEY asked the complAo°,4 be 'e• ,
wished the policeman to be sworn, f'o- 6 1)33
I, .
"Yes, Sir, certainly."ad id 10'1'
The defendant then took the oath,[s,- bad se tbe
seen the girl many times, but be net '-eottid,,lllies
with the girl. She had spoken
liar intercourse with her, and therefore er live
the father. He never took any 030°?
Complainant—He to OD' tog "/°stlier
Mr. YARDLEY—Do you hear that, Y°., tot
sheTmheuDsteefeonmdeant—te
1 ta
of my child. c. best. ge Ole
swears falsely. tie I
driven her away, and told her if sbe vil CO.
05 1)() of rib,
anotherDefendant—She
h e
Mr. . YARDLEY was bound to sal there fief stoi
firmatory evidence. According to II witoea6;rioa°
statute, the defendant was a conWeten ferY 5000;
if he had taken a false oath it W 95 6Co f,°r, Ohl
thing, and would rest heavily DP°, ,1° ot,
thiams9c.ome on M.,
sated to,
tore. A fortnight athe defendsn' - le 11 jeo'
go tool 0 ,
been sworn. The result would thetio3ooP
same, there being no confirmatory tes.- Jed'
to make an order. The case was distoi° for
AB bsrde
SOUTH IVARK• d fit .-,,d0- 3
Brecknell and Richards were Ploce jot° ~,- o,°,
re-examination charged with breskivgpoort;oto '
of Mr. Hill, a schoolmaster in 01, .overe -
ste• •
(ding a cash-box containing " oi3er.
t co° clle
gold guard-chain. i jot° 6, ~..oii iv
The evidence,
which was enter
narrated
rateo'hofstliea
able length, may be thus briefly 1331.000C150014'5ti3e
night of the sth instant the cornpla,l°,,tio tbe .110„,r,
retired to bed after having fastens° "` , I'Der.
vrido, , / t ,or
windows. The next morning (' patert'olB"sd'
servant maid got up she found, 00 ' iot°' tbe -ets
lour, that the house had been brokelitell
it coati ' the
boards and drawers in that room, agod thefroinidbst
joining one, being forced open is,:t:o';, d°' ..a.,,
strewed about the floor in all dire',..l,,,e, he -:,a
latter room, on the complainant hei,r,jed ttle'reeigna. ltl
had taken place, and on proceecunroaole't) tole ea
covered that his cash-box, containil lost ti, boa l'erdt
a gold chain, had been taken. P., el„,. the "ftet,ot
giving information of the burgifi'l 55 'ere'
ode f 00
committed to the police ; and o°°3-asion °Alt °llOB
he saw the gold chain in the P°s9e;eclOce.o6r, err'
Quinnear, of the L division, wb° 13" the Pef tau 'the
occasion, and it was identified hYlietisiou
put oe lag
circumstances attending the aPPre" ell se beo
soners are as follows •--At on efl 0 bolo ,of
mornin subsequent .to coniplair° 5 c 13n)
' softer hbour late
broken pinto
and robbed, the Prihe peig"(l3ree" PA
shoemaker named Matthews, in t."- ill s 'IV'
'
' a tile eiitne`eiPtle
East-lan W
ef alworth, when one ~ A the (.„ co- -1310,
exhibited a guard-chain, and ass;d. Pv a fOr
tole
and ascertain whether it Was got
0,000 ofoteep
with the request, having pre/it:4l5lY A P‘Vi ifig tO
•le to boy, e
and accordingly took the antic eve stifle isir
shop, where it was stopped. 11)°, pa la to 10:19°
apprised of the latter fact succeaue toe"
age
t a c° tit, Dip lof ' o
two •
prisoners into custody a 0 t bit icy
the it, 'o°
house in Kent-street, and when , seep 100
they at first disclaimed ever hay ing 00 e4ll° 001
wards declared that they found it' eaot Illred t],
SerS effect sacc',ao
' of the complainant's house bY
bad beet/ id too
discovered that an entry ha' ti tbe Sil
the parlour window, the burgia%teae e Est t
hat/
in putting back the catch which,lf , or 0003 eofiefe;
bottom sashes by means of a lolvevicleoced co°,
instrument of that description. "."-iej ova fellileof
tried to , .A,
adduced that Richards had beep larl' 111° ter
at the Old Bailey in 1849, of bUrga that ot t
to seven years' transportation, le felonl itill
C
prisoner had also been convicted . fie°
sions, and suffered imprisoninentio theo
The prisoners, who merely dell , ore
committed. _----''''' .10,lit'
____-
glee, 5.0t.„,r
,4 pills joborof"00
[ADvERTIsEmENT.]--IlollowaYo6.--,4 VI,
for Stomach Complaints, Indigestion,o7o, low, 00'00 IA
Esq., Launceston, Van Diemen's 1'1°451. 0: repro 010'
Holloway, by letter dated March 17, t` fiollsheeo
thud,ell epti
of Hobart Town, declared to hin3 ththe bad, debut
be
011 c,,
been the means of saving her life. '-'_„hiel: 'eget tV 'Or
time afflicted with an inward disease, "idol!! on 0011°0o.ilf
the doctors, and for two years .he g` -thatrestlieg g
worse. Accidentally meeting wi _ eedti‘eieri°,oo.oe
wayian System of Medicine, she cotnrcieb°,, pers deoirbpop,
Pills, and found immediate relief, Sofa 69 ,°icrsil sof Dot'
use she was permanently cured.---'" ; ;4', „010 00 std
at Professor Holloway's Establish 3L: prey;ipg ,c de iv,
A TRAP FOR THISTES.---11-'vd, o'a b•-opt•,,ol'
Sampson, colour merchant, Birken,bei'oecasie:iWeetliSr4 sr
glariously entered on three severs", riotDeet6lol'o3°,
man devised a simple plan to detectt el ceeof3';,
the booty secured previously led him i°ol'';iii ono f"',est4,
no person living on the premis!°' tirel,i'yeJt "eetil,i" Art,l
tached to the office door, come:3olcl o'c' lig ros''fa!,,
two 00 450 jfr° IS
an adjoining house; and about
neigh s. „e
be nob bad sere oeY: 01
morning the quiet sleeper of t
tia ol Atte) 410 Dil
roused by a violent ringing. "." To A pr- 00,)
after some searching, the thief, w-"
,d in ~sh'`',.d.,•edl"
roof of an outhouse, was found stow- ath-a 0 ~.J.,1
turned out to be a beerhouse-keePrn'tencle,il4o'
been in the employ of the partY 1116/. is
person was found 51. in gold, as'
Stan .lard.
• 0'
VP ,i
OW ife '
818 2^.0-g• ft,. f
actri- ast,' ~,,,' .
or
On the 17th inst. at the RectorYwiater.,,doo, e
~„,,
folk, the wife of the Bev George tea'', CO eft
On the 17th inst., at Crohaul,
, Vii°' et
Robert Pollock, Esq. _
....iiic.,l itii°
On the 16th inst., at Tavisteoctc,. 0° ci
the wife of George Yarde Sparh ,tir'l,,
~,arbiol, pir
or A D•n° hell, °) aeSt
On the 17th inst., at Coati/Am. der vev
George P. Wilkinson, Esq. f A,lesol tO
mp. l,
On the 14th inst., the wife o .ov-iletl,
OW. C° f ‘
Avenue-road, Regent's-park.
iv, , OS rip 0
MABBlro'ret °' a$ CD Iltet 'fi
On the 18th inst. at
.:-, S. )stler of Cls't (iillt' off !I's,
Rev. James pulling, D.D., b-as coing_,,,r, ,js 'li 1
Cambridge, to Elizabeth blk!llielstrriio;orge sllev
Hodgson, Esq., of Dean's-yard, '
Surrey ,
at:, to
1;1
On tbe 15th inst., at Reigate.,irroiab $
. sr
V
son of John Charles, Esq., et " of JOlll3 01
bath, third surviving daughter
idir t
Salmon's cross, Reigate, Surrey
Tori" 41,0"
p1EP.,1,, tletr a s.i' coceLts)
gollitn"' sgej lin eV/
On the 16th inst., at the t_otideley,6it. oigovids)
the Rev. 1-brace George Choeblill-b°leentt jj;hr "
On the 18th inst., at Brant itoo-cregfairs ° De •
On the 14th inst., 3t "01 for the 31 Itilef ';'
vireo 01
George Maule, Esq., solicit r a
~ otise, , no
Treasury. ddnel‘'" 05' i
On the 15th inst., at Cell 83. .., ~., el
_hire. tes. fip
John New, Esq., 111. D., 8g ,(,-,1 , 00013, PSn9ipt67o.ll ,
On the 15tt. inst., John. i„, sortnoe, 1 AO°
hcos
R. 'Thornton, E,q., of 11r.pewliinc61;',
S"s'''lla;4 °l.' "St reP VI
On the 16th inst., at Ise.4o,„vi _ .41 .(
On the 17th inst., at COLdeso' .
,0,50, 4, y
FolD:“; De°
liarben, aged 77' N rtb-en"' f,•l.Arie ii
On the 16th inst andat o
,r,. g. ,
Loeta. L, 'anal, 4i
Lieut.-Colonel Eden +to De itip i
On the 17th inst., at ' ,0 4vrioll
Addington, aged 48. ginocet 000
- - - --------
—Pt-tblishedr s„ 0
go
London: Printed and , ~ at ,he _ov. i
No. 112, Strand, Fria the SPilit,
Strand, in the Precinct °.`„,,,ber 201.
NOYW
igidclleaessYlittradaY;

. << .

„ •

frd'

ir. 11"

id me ?
IVO be
nit you
rOta
ak of 111

)t.
ever i°.
n
:ages ''-

ro.
liog ,
Arfib
ai ir
b Obr
eel