The Sun.
London, England, 1851-06-30 00:00:00

; :: , .• ,
i
i
. .
1 •
...-------....----------"
.:'• IV :5nr,t1132.1031 11.7..cn '‘.7:-:.,1,a7,-,y;T;-1.-t.A.7.0',..
, P Si•iCe OM' Its' repor.. V:, f,,- mat ket. be: e 1_,,,e11 sessOn-
silly weil ,upplit,il v.'it'f each kind of tnelt, a rortion of
~i .
wriich. nolvrithAtinHipg th:l prevailing hot W e tither , had
Len derived from the v t,Villeeg, in which ce miy a od
..
• 2,..,P rate business has been &Ars-, on somewhat lower terms.
At per 2tona of the Carcase.
3. d. to s. d. I 5, d• to r:. 0.
0,, neerontortor.••• •• 2 2 2 4 1 Mutton, interior .•2 4 2 8
1, .--., middling —— 2 6 2 8 1 --middling— 210 3 2
~.. •-- primele.rge .. 210 3 0I pilaw •••• 3 4 3 8
-',:.? prime small .. 3 2 3 4 ; P0rk,1arge........ 2 2 3 2
Vall• • .••••• ...... 2 6 3 6 ' smell 3 4 3 8
-'f tA.r..tb, 3,8 d to C; 103.
1303Z0T1G33 ae.IsID SP3.T.6..X3rIELDS.
The at rivals of (Ad Poi awes hionug eseesed, the few
se , parcels left over are (delt; et very irrt guiar prices.
New qualities, bath Eriglieh arid foreign, are conalag
• freely to hand, and a god business is doing in them, at
ie. . from 8s to 20e per cwt. Last week's imports into
' t London were 12,000 baskets from Rotterdam, and 700
Y - from Dunkirk, or about 750 tons.
1.10,330 Ulan Ler Itill&StllET.
`:i Owing to the couttnued increase in the fly in most
re plants ions, our market is firm, and prices are tending
upwards. Duty, 90.000/. to 100,000/. Mid and East
Ilse, a . Kent Rickets 41 4s to 71 ss; Weald or Kent ditto, 41 to
4, ,
'.i.,' 4l 153; Sussex ditto, 41 to 41 10s per cwt. .
woox..
._• ~• A° private contract market being exteissively sup-
Ase..te plied with all kinds of Wool, the stock of Celotoarbeing
e-.,;..,.. upwards of 30,000 bales, the demand is exceedingly in-
_ active, and lest week's prices are almost nominal. The
. ,
imports have amenno,d to 430 bales; from Haraburish,
2,677 tr"m Sydney, 23 from Alexandria, and 19 bags
f• fr ni Oporto.
t:' f1r.0.7.13033T.
The deliveries of Tallow have been somewhat exten-
sive during the past week for the time of year; hence
the market is tolerably firm at very lull prices. To-day
e P.Y.C. on the spot is quoted at 37s 9d; and for forward
• a i delivery 38s 6d to 38e 9d per cwt. Town Tallow, 35s
dds . 6d per cwt OPt cesh; rough fee 2s per 811 s.
IA 1847. 1848. ts 49. 1850. 1851.
j A -_ - - -
Stock this day ••.... 8,422 2,418 . 23,115 23,971 36,527
, 4oa 3d 44s 6d 388 3d 36,s 9d to 77s 9d
, Price of Y. C. •• ••
~ . . lto 40s rid to 4 i a9a to ,1 36s Cd to OP Od
..; , Delivery last week •• 532 1,444 1,221
,802 1,415
...: l
~ Dittp from Jtme 1.• • . 3,687 6,4i7 ' 4,703 4,2,6 4, i5O
~, , Arrivals last week .. 558 710 1,044 4 , 244
',
' lij 4 ;
I.' 1 Ditto from June 1. .• 3,99 u 6,316 i 2,415 2,633 4,344
Price or Town „..... 5380 d 46463 I 39.46 d 38s Od 388 Od
THE GREAT EXHIBITION.
, ..
i (THIS DAY.)
.j The number of visitors who entered the building this
morning was abcut 17,000, and from the crowds coed-
,
, Dually passing in every moment we have no doubt that
• 1 to-day's returns
greatw found as saristectory as on any
previous day. A waut of efficient veatiletion has
, .
been felt during the last few days of intensely hot wea-
ther which we have experienced. It the Crystal Palace
cA
is to be left staneing—and no voice is now raised to
4 advocate its demolition—and more especially if it is to be
turned into a winter garden, it is not too late now to
i) `,.... ~ commence operations fur ventlating and warming the
k. 21,11/er;
Is; , ,i''',', building, to accommodate its temperature to the various
'f t . SettiOns, and we are sure that such a measure, under-
re.,:, s; ' taken and carried out speedily, would render a visit to
I:.s ':I the Exhibition much more a matter of enjoyment than
.1. ''; it is when the visitor, as now, is obliged to make his
a, see , promenade in an atmosphere not many degrees cooler
r ;
a, e. than a vapour bath.
1V:: '
.• ..e: The visitors to-day consisted for the most part o
' f
excursionists, a great proportion of whom were evi-
dently present for the first time. The number of fo-
reigners too increase considerably; but we are informed
..t' that at present the advanced guard of continental visi-
tors has only as yet visited our shores, and that the
1 .s. main body will scarcely arrive here before the end of the
,
ensuing month.
, •,`e ,
el -
HOUSE OF LORDS.—(THIS DAY.)
:- , Their Lordabips sat to-dey to near appeals. The
'-
Peers preseet were tha Lord Chancellor and Lord
. ',:.• Brougham, No caze of pubic interest occurred this
morning.
i! '.
,e, -5,,, •
ROLLS' COURT.—(THIS DAY.)
, (Before the MASTER of the Roans.)
~,, His Honour this morning proceeded with the part-
:' Vi
i' heard case of Brown v. Oekshott.
it. ;, VICE-CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY.)
(Before Vice-Chancellor KNIGHT BRUCE.)
$ .--
• 1 His Honour was occupied this morning with unop-
posed petitions.
, , (Before Vice-Chancellor Lord CRANWORTIL)
,". EGERTON V. EARL BR ,WNL4,W.
I
i 1 ,
This was a demurrer respecting the description of the
' .. property of the late Earl of Bridgewater, who died
about 1830, leaving.his estates to his nearest heirs male,
.. Lord Aliord and Mr. Cust, under certain conditions,
one of which was that all efforts should be used to in-
•'' - ,
. xt • a
'st :''s• duce the Crown to revive the title of Earl of Bridge-
water. The defendants are the Earl of Brownlow,
\,,f'. c . litr. Cust, and Mr. Tatton Egerton, M.P. The plaintiff
is the sou of the late Lard Aitord.
ile as) Mr. Russell appeared for Mr. Cust, and was opening
, the case when we went to press.
(Before Vice-Chancellor TURNER.)
BEADON V. KING.
This part-heard case was sig,,,iu proceeded with.
QUEEN'S BENCH.--(THIS DAY.)
, . _
, -I (Sittings at Niai Pelee in Guildhali, 134.,f438,4 tho LORD
CHIEF JUSTICE )•
.. ,
BARTLETT, CLERK, V. EVANS.
t This was an action of debt, brought to recover 158/.
for money bad and received to the tae of the plaintiff.
Mr. Prentice appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Keat-
:::
e .
;! inthga:fr'p'.l
I
the'Pit iti
sEhdNmerecenci atEd,ahneit.nw
aospceni :nag b
etfhoer
ecase e to
Bishop the Coot. nhr
its.
stated that some time ago the plaintiff, who was a bene-
ficed clergyman, was convicted of a libel, and sentenced
to two years' imprisonment. While be was undergoing
diocese, to show cause why he did not attend at his
, s
induttihees
parishas incumbentof
Leominster,of th e dainsdtr
as
st
ncoh uwracsh
notof ilnv ian gptoosni:
lion to comply with that citation, the Bishop issued a writ
of sequestration, appointieg the defendant sequestrator,
ie in which capacity he received the money now sought to be
recovered. Now, there were three points of objections
which the plaintiff wished to raise against the si quedra-
, tion of the Bishop of Hereford; firstly, that illasmuch
as the plaintiff was prevented from performing his duties
i by a competent legal tribunal, it could not be said that
''
:-. he had contumaciou-ly disobeyed the citation, and there-
- ) fore the Bishop had no power to resort to a sequestration;
secondly, the great principle of law, which laid it down
that no man should be deprived of his right or property
, until he had been called upon to show cause, and hed
actually had an opportunity of showing cause against
~ . such a proceeding; and, thirdly, that there was no real-
denCe upon the plaintiff's bete rice to enable him to com-
ply with the citation in the first instance. Those were
ed
, . e the points of law involved in the case, and on behalf of
--
.- s , e. the plaintiff, he was desirous it should be taken pro
forma for the plaintiff, subject to a case for the opinion
/i%l.- /
of the-Court above, to be tounded upon a bill of excep-
tions, which the other side should have the advantage of
ee . preparing.
Mr. KEATING declined to accede to the proposal, in-
il,l forming the Court that the points raised by his Learned
Pried bad already been discussed in the court above, on
an ElPplication for a writ of prohibition to be issued
s ' agaioit the sequestration, and decided against the
.: If ,
*•/7
1g
;., . plaintiff.
Mr. P'4tEmTrcE, under these circumstances, had no al-
ternative but to proceed with the case.
Evidence was 'then put in to prove that the defendant
Was duly licensed, and inducted into his living in Here-
fordshire; but one of the witnesses stated that the Ec-
clesiestical Commissioners bait received the fruits of the
.
benefice and paid them over to the defendant as signe.- .
, . trator; and
rt The COURT held that there was no case to go to the
r' jury. There was nothing to show that a sequestration
, , , had not taken place, and it must, therefore, be presumed
-r,-,
that the defendant had properly received the money.
Mr. PRENTICE contended that he had Wade out the
Plaintiff's chum to the living. and that was enough.
His Lordship would observe that if the sequestration
%: were allowed to continue the eleiutiff would have to
-.-. - suffer the loss of his living as well as the two years' the-
- dle ' prisonment which was being inflicted upon him for the
ee , libel.
Lord CAMPBELL said it did not follow that the seques-
• tration deprived the plaintiff of his living.
Mr. PRENTICE said iu this case it would, for as the
1 ,•' plaintiff's trim of imprisonment would not expire fur
. some eight' en mouths he could not retake pothe,lol) of
the living witlein a year atter the issuieg
c'e•-e of the acqueS•
i
tration, and be would therefore be wholly depraved 0, it.
`. Lord ,„
, ~k,,- ' CAMPBELL repeated his opinion that there
was
no case to go so the jury, and the plaintiff was accord-
Y....''', n' ingly nonsuited.
S.IARLBR.O'-STREE r—(THIS DAY.)
•s, . 1 41._
t ,•:. i
, ...-
1 ,5.-
;.:
EXTRAORDIY ROBBERYINSTER BANK AT THE LON-
Sr.
DON ANNARD WESTMINSTER
,
JAMES'S-SQUARE.
,
John Tyler, aged 62, a returned transport, and William
Couty, 69, were brought before Nlr. Hard wieke, in eels-
Per) • tody of Inspector Lund and Sergeant Whicher, of the
...-
Detective Police, charged with having committed a
i''
~ :
" ..
, ,
~,,,,, most daring robbery, at the branch establishment of the
:1
London and Westminster Bank, St. James's-square.
The prisoner Tyler refused to give his address, and
the other prisoner, Cauty, described himself as a "gen-
s'e: _ tleMan," residing
' i es i 53, Commerciel-road, Lambeth.
s , Mr. Lewis,L -wits solicitor, of Ely place, attended to conduct
.
l 'V
1 1:-:. s •
et .
•
v , ts
te-
the prosecution on the part el the London and West.
.
minster Bank. There were also present several fume
tionaries conueeted with the bank. A solicitor namesVicers, as we understood, defended Cauty. The other
prisoner was unprovitied with legit' advice.
Cauty was dressed in a suit of black, and bad a rather
respectable appearance. Tyler was shabbily attired
taut locked like a m chanic ut of employ.
Mr. Lewis having briefly recapitulated the facts o
the case, cued the following witnesses :
Ire.pector Lund, of the detective police, said-01
Ss Saturday, the 31st of May last, I was near Trafalgar,
square. I observed the prisoner Tyler. I was accum
panied by Sergeant Whicher. He had a great coax a
, o his left arm. W !richer knew him, and in conger-at-woe
° of what he communicated to me, I watched tf:
t se
' 4 prisoner b,r that time. He went into St. Jarres's-par.
• 6 ,'
and sat down on one ui ik.,e era s near ilia cows, opposit
the Duke of York's M.o lie was iminediatel
a joined by Ceuty, who shot k him by the baud. Ti:e
A. , , both sac down for twenty minutes, sad then wi,lit to
a
London and Wes• moister B s ids, in Charles-street, S
James's-square. Ctiey entered and remained inside ii
ten or twelve minutes. The other prisoner remeieu
t-- ' at the opposite (sumer. This was about tweie
.1, , li,
minutes past three. At the lapse of the twelve minut
: :' 'co' ~ '

EXTRAORDINARY ROBBERY AT THE LON-
DON AND WESTMINSTER BANK, bT.
JAMES'S-SQUARE.
John Tyler, aged 62, a returned transport, and William
Cauty, 69, were brought before Nlr. Hard wieke, in cus-
tody of Inspector Lund and Sergeant Whicher, of the
Detective Police, charged with baying committed a
most daring robbery, at the branch establishment of the
London and Westminster Bank, St. James's-square.
The prisoner Tyler refused to give his address, and
the other prisoner, Cauty, described himself es a "gen-
tleman," residing at 53, Commercial-road, Lambeth.
Mr. Lewis,solicitor, of Ely place, attended to conduct
the prosecution on the part of the London and West-
minster I3ank. There were also present several func-
tionaries connected with the bank. A solicitor named
Vicers, as we understood, defended Cauty. The other
prisoner was unprovided with legal advice.
Cauly was dressed in a suit of black, and bad a rather
respectable appearance. T} ler was shabbily attired,
and looked like a m chanic out of employ.
Mr. Lewis having briefly recapitulated the facts of
the case, c.ilied the following witnesses :
Iwpector Lund, of the detective police, sahl—On
Saturday, the 31st of May last, I was near Trafalgar-
square. I observed the prisoner Tyler. I was accom-
panied by &rgefint Whicher. He had a great coat on
his left arm. W !licher knew him, and in consopence
of what he communicated to me, I watched the
prisoner for that time. He went into St. Jamrs's-park
and se down on one of il.:e sea s near the cows, opposite
the Duke of York's M.iournent. lie was immediately
joined by Cauty', who ,ho, k him by baud. They
both sa( down for twenty minutes, and then went to the
London and Wes. ni Ito. ter 13. k, in Charles- street, St.
jtmea's-square. Ctity entered and remained inside for
ten or twelve willow:•. The other prisoner remained
at the opposite corner. This eras about twenty
minutes past three. At the lapse of the twelve minutes