The Sun.
London, England, 1834-05-07 00:00:00

BILL.

The Earl of RADNOR then moved the second reading
of this bill for giving indemnity to witnesses who should give
evidence on the Liverpool Freemen's Disfranchisement Bill.
The Earl of WICKLOW was surprised that the riohle

lord the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster would allow
the second reading of this bill to- pass without any obser-
vation. When a similar bill was brought in, in the case of
East Retford, it was most strenuously opposed by the
noble baron and the noble earl at the head of the govern-
ment. _ _ _

After a few words from the Marquis of CLANat-
CARDS and Lord REDESDALE,
Lord HOLLAND said, that the noble earl seemed to
imply that he had been guilty of some gross inconsistency
in supporting the present bill. He (Lord Holland)
thought that the noble earl had no right to think that he
supported the bill, as he had as yet given no opinion upon
it ' • and, in fact, he had very serious objections to it.
The bill was then read a second time.
WARWICK INDEMNITY TO WITNESSES' BILL.
On the motion of the Earl of DURHAM, this bill was
read a second time.
WARWICK BOROUGH BILL.
The order of the day was then read for the further
hearing of evidence on this bill.
Mr. HARRISON, on the part of the petitioners, called
several voters, who proved that they had received money
on condition that they should vote on the side of Sir
Charles Greville.
Mr. Thomas Bell was next called in and examined.
The house adjourned at half-past nine to half-past three
to-morrow (this day).

HOUSE OF COMMONS, May 6.
The SPEAKER resumed the Chair at the usual hour.
MESSAGE FROM THE LORDS.

A communication was made to the house that their lord-
ships had given assent to several private bills.
Mr. HEA T H CO TEpresented a petition from Huddleston ,
Lincolnshire, against the General Registration Bill. The
hon. gentleman observed that as that bill had been read only
the first time on last Friday, the second reading should
not take place on to-morrow. Petitions were presented
by the same hon. member from several places in Lincoln-
shire for the better observance of the Sabbath.

Mr. W. BROUGHAM observed that some arrange-
ment should be made, in order that one general discussion
might be afforded on the subject of the Registration Bill.
Mr. HODGES presented a petition from George G.
Finsbury, Lieutenant in the Queen's Guards, relative to
the mode of taking legal evidence, and praying for an al-
teration in the same. The hon. gentleman also presented
petitions from Rochester against the Malt Bill, and from
Bedford in favour of the Labourers' Employment Bill.
Mr. HUME said that he should postpone his motion
on the Stamp Duties Bill, as he perceived that the hon.
member for Lincoln had one to that effect to make.

The SPEAKER was anxious to know what was the
wish of the house as to the proceedings of that evening, as
it was a day for notices. The Irish Church Bill stood
for the second reading, and it was proper to ascertain
what the house chose to do in that.

Lord ALTHORP said it would be a great convenience
if the house would allow the debate upon the Irish Tithe
Bill to be concluded. He put it to hOn. members who
had notices on the book whether they would not allow the
adjourned debate to take precedence?