The Sun.
London, England, 1834-06-02 00:00:00

DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK•

riticKS OT STOCKS TH4
Bank Stock 2164
3 per Cent. Red 91%14
3 per Cent. Cons.' 9•214 414
34 per Cent.
Ditto Red 98% 94
New 334 per Cent. P.0%144 14
3 per Cent. Ann. 1726._. --
4 per Cent. 18,26 Assent.. 994 %
Ditto Dissented lOO7
Bank Long Ann. to expire
Jan. 5, ..... 17 3-16 14
Oct.lo, 1859
Jan. 5, 1800 17 7-16 %
Jan, 5, 1880
Aprils, 1880
Jan. 5, 1870

New 5 per Cent .............
India Stock ............... 268 7
Ditto Bonds ............ 28 pm.
South Sea Stock ........ 105%
Old Annuities ............. . .

New Ditto .....................
3 per Cent Ann. 1751.51
Ex. Bills, £I,OOC ......
Ditto 500...... 50 51 pm•
Ditto Small ..... . ...... 50 51 pm.
Ditto Commercial ......... pm.
Ditto Advertised ......49 50 pm.
Bank for Acc0unt.......... --
India for Account ...
Cons. for Account ...92%%T

PRICES OP FOREIGN FUNDS THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK.
Austrian Bonds loo4i Peruvian Bonds 9l 2
B,lcian Bonds ON ; Ditto Account 0134
Ditto Account 31851 ;Portuguese Bonds ......7714 614
Brazilian Bonds 76t4 i Ditto Account 77% 64i
Ditto Account -654 Ditto New Bonds ...7756 6%
(perms Ayres Bonds 3254 2 Ditto Acconnt...77% S 630,9
Ditto Account .32U , Prussian Bonds 103t4 3
Chilian Bonds ' 48% i Ditto Bonds, 1822 to3
Ditto Account °Bl4 inussian Bonds, 180'3 1( 57si
Columbian Bonds 235 f Ditto Account,
Ditto Account. SU, i Ditto 111
Ditto Bonds, 1824 064 'Spanish Bonds, Is2l 3834 4
Ditto Account clili 7 ; Ditto Ace......... 36% 814 8g
Danish Bon 4 75 Ditto Bonds llt3 :14%
Ditto Account 75 Ditto Accoun' 34%
Greek Bonds French Berates, 51'. C. —r —c.
Ditto Bonds, 1825 MN :----- Exchange f —c.
Ditto Account — .-..-...-.. 4 per cent
Mexican Bonds, 5 per ecnt.34B4 ---- Exchange .... —f ___,.
Ditto Account 4hitch, ‘-'l, p. c.... ...... 52%Nr fe
It, 0, 6 per cent 455434 N Ditto Account .52% %
Ditto Accouiv 45(4 Ditto, sp. C.
97% 47,4
51 Neapolitan.— - .... ........... 94% i Ditto Account
-

PRICES OF SHAItXS THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK.
Pail. l'or Share
Alien Mining C0mpany.................. .E. 9 1I U
Anglo Mex. Min. it,. tiss. at 5/. pm. £lOO 9
Bolanos Mining Company El5O 142 ,4rl :0
Brazilian Mining Company 5 15
Brazilian imp. Min. Co. psi. at 5/. pin.) E 2.0 59 l 4
ditto Macaubas Cocaes 2O 20
Ditto St. John Del Rev
Cata Branca Mining Company nA Gli
Uritish Iron Mining, Comnany EN 30%,
Columbian Mil ii na Co. (iss. at 51. pm.) 5”6 10e.
English Mining Company . ......
General Mining Association l`2
Hibernian Mining Co. £lO
-EON
Mexican Mining Co.
Real del Monte Mining Co....(unreg.) .---
United Mex. Min. Co. (iss. at 'X. pm.) 40
Ditto New Scrip 5
Alliance Fire Insurance C0mp,.,..
Protector I ntnirance Comp.
Australian Co
Canada Company
General Steam .lavigation Co. l3
National Provincial Bank of England 15
Rio I)oce
Provincial Bank of Ireland 25

-11
3514

llii'
..tI 9 0

HIGII WATER. AT LONDON BRIDGE TO 3101L1Ow.
Morning . 3 minutes after 11. I Evening...So minutes after 11.

~,turce •
fribr

LONDON,
MONDAY EVENING, JUNE 2, 1834.

SUN OFFICE, Quarter to Four.

This afternoon, about two o'clock, a very,.
numerous meeting, consisting of upwards of 300
members of the House of Commons, took place
at the Foreign Office, to hear the proposition of
ministers with regard to the course of proceed-
ing this evening on Mr. WARD'S resolutions.
The plan submitted .by Lord ALTHORP was
to adopt theprincipte embodied in Mr. WARD'S
resolutions, and to issue a commission, forth-
with, to inquire into the state of the
Irish Church. This Commission is to be of
the most searching character and is to make a
report at the earliest possible period. Upon
the tenor of that report will depend what future
measures shall be adopted, but. the most straight-
forward course is to be pursued.
Lord ALTHORP was very warmly cheered
in his address to the meeting.
Mr. ABERCROMBIE, too, addressed the
meeting in a very eloquent speech, strongly re-
commending the support of Ministers, and he
was immensely cheered.
Sir FRANCIS BURDETT and several other
members also spoke to the same purport.
_ _

The only question left undecided was, whether
there should be a resolution of the house de-
claratory of Mr. WARD'S proposition, or whe-
ther a commission simply should issue.
If Mr. WARD should persist in his motion
it is intended to meet it with the previous ques-
tion, but if he should not, then everything will
go off smoothly.
There is a meeting of Mr. WARD'S friends
now, at the hour we write, debating what course
he shall pursue, and upon the result of that will
depend the decision to-night in the house.

Though Earl GREY'S cabinet has not re-
ceived an accession of strength, yet it may so
conduct itself as to secure support from the
country. There must be an end of palliatives
and expedients. Every measure must rest upon,
and be adapted to, the nature of society and the
principle of things. It must also be well consi-
dered both in its matter and its. manner by the
cabinet, by whom it should be approved of in
all its parts and bearings before it is propounded.
The want of previous consideration, and of
proper communication, has been the rock on
which the late cabinet has split. Care must
be taken that the penalty which has been now
paid shall not be again suffered. Even with re-
ference to the question which broke up the late
cabinet, we suspect much yet rerhains to be
settled. Though every just and reasonable mind
will agree that ministers of the established
church in Ireland should not continue after the
termination of the existing interests to be la-
vishly paid for doing nothing, or next to nothing,
still there may be much difference of opinion
as to the mode of application of the surplus
property of the Irish church—we mean the
property that shall remain after duly providing
for the Protestant establishment in Ireland.
Now there are two things in that country for
which provision requires to be made, the relief
of the poor and public education—and even
though the conclusion should be arrived at, that
the surplus property of the church in Ireland
should be devoted to these two purposes, still
the question will remain, in whom the property
should be vested for these purposes, and how
the purposes, or either of them, are to be ac-
complished. A previous question also will be,
what is to be the establishment of the Irish
church after the termination of the existing in-
terests. This question mint be settled before it
can appear what the surplus may be that is to
be applied to other purposes. We merely throw
out these things to show that the difficulties of
the cabinet are only beginning. We shall en-
Aleavour to return to the subject.

The General Assembly of the Church of
Scotland have come to a decision on the ques-
tion of patronage, which is of the greatest im-
portance not only to that Church, but also to
the Church of England. This question has
for years excited strong feelings among the in-
habitants of the northern part of the island,
and .may be said to have divided the church

into two parties—the one contending that the
people ought to.be the sole judges of the fit-
ness or unfitness of a. candidate for a liv-
ing, while the other as strenuously contended
that the patron and the presbytery (the clergy
of the district) were the only competent autho-
rities. The great body of the people, of course,
joined with the former, but as they had little
influence in church courts till lately, the-mode-
rate party found no difficulty in defeating any
attempts to confer the right of election on the
people. The Scotch Burgh Reform Bill
passed last session, has, however, completely
changed the state of parties, and has thrown
into the assembly a preponderance of popular
influence which has completely swamped that
party which had long ruled its destinies. It
may be necessary to state, that the assembly is
composed of clergy and laymen—the former
being in the proportion of about two to one as
compared with the latter. The clergy are re-
turned by their own body, and the laymen are
returned by the boroughs—the number altogether
amounting to about 350. Most of the lay mem-
bers having joined the antipatronage party,
the victory, of course, was easy and complete.
Our only wish is, that they may not have
cause to repent it ; but, looking at the nature
of the constituent bodies that will thus have
the appointment of the Clergy, the vast evils of
popular election in the Church, and the bias
which it will necessarily give to the feelings
and habits of candidates, we have the greatest
fear for the result, and are fully convinced that
it will neither raise the character of the Scot-
tish Clergy, nor abate dissension, nor pro-
vide Ministers more suited to the wants
and desires of the people. The party
who introduced the measure brought it forward
under the plea that the right of patronage would
be left untouched.. They either deceive them-
selves, or their object is to deceive others. The
declaration of the Assembly (if it can be en-
forced) will destroy patronage as completely as
if it had been abrogated by act of ParliaMent ;
for it expressly states that no person can be
inducted into a living if he is disapproved of
by a majority of the parishioners. This is
precisely the case in all popular elections.
It is the same principle which decides the elec-

tion of a parish doctor or overseer, or parish
beadle, and the election will often be attended
with the same canvassing, the same electioneer-
ing tricks, the same animosity, and the same
disgraceful conduct which unfortunately so often
characterizes these elections. Any one who
has seen what has passed at the election of an
evening preacher here may form some idea
of the practical working of such a measure.
But these are not the only evils. It will
deter men of great ability and independent cha-
racter from entering the Church, it will lead to
hypocrisy and deceit, and induce candidates
for the ministry to acquire rather those qualifi-
cations which may please, than those which
may benefit the multitude. We appeal to
the history of the church, and call on the
authors of this measure to reflect how many
clergy, that are now beloved by their flocks, were
opposed by them at first, and how very few of
the leading men of the Church and of the men
that have distinguished themselves as authors
would have been admitted had their appoint-
ment been left to the people. This declaration
takes the affair entirely out of the hands of the
clergy, and vests the right in the people ; for
however high may be the candidate's qualifica-
tion, however firmly convinced the patron may
be, from long experience, that his nominee is the
fittest person for the office, the congregation'
may reject him without assigning one reason,
or affording the presbytery an opportunity of
judging whether the objections are frivolous or
well founded. We cannot help thinking that

it would have been more conducive to the in-
terests of the church, if the people had been
allowed to object to the candidate, and state
their objections to the presbytery, in order that
they might receive the fullest investigation, leav-
ing the presbytery the supreme right to decide
on his merits or demerits. According to the
plan of Lord MONCRIEFF, who introduced the
motion, the church is deprived nearly of all
control in the settlement, and the patron is
deprived of a valuable privilege. Whether that
can be done without an act of Parliament is
another question. The numbers for and against
the measure were 184 and 138.

The elections in the North have terminated
triumphantly for the Liberal cause. The
LORD ADVOCATE is returned for Leith by a
majority of 267, the numbers being 686 and
419, and Sir JOHN CAMPBELL is also re-
turned for -Edinburgh. The result of the poll
on Friday was—

Sir John Campbell
Mr. Learmouth 1,229
Mr. Ay toun
We have letters dated Saturday noon, which
state that Sir JOHN'S majority was increasing,
and there was no doubt whatever of his return•
This is as it ought to be.

The Dutch papers of the 30th ult. contain
an article from Constantinople, which makes
no mention of the reported assassination of
Mehemet Ali, Pacha of Egypt.
DUTCH FUNDS—AMSTERDAM, MAY 30.
Actual Debt, 2% per Cent.
A mart Syndic, 4;4 per cent. 90% to 91
Ditto, ditto, 311 par cent.
loan of 1831, 5 per cent
Ditto, 15.32 and Lik33, 3 per Cent 97 to 97%
Exchange on London 12 10
Ditto, two months 12 03
PRUSSIAN FUNDS—BERLIN, MAY 26.
St. Schuld. Sch. 4 per cent.
Prussian English Loan, 1818, 5 per cent 103% --
Ditto 1822. 5 per cent... -- _
Thtto Bonds ligla. 4 per cnt.... 9514 94%
AUSTRIAN FUNDS.—VIENNA, MAY a
Four per Cent. Metalliques, 91; Bank Shares, 1,2A3,
BELGIAN FUNDS.—BRUSSELS, MAY 30.
Actual Debt, 2 % per Cent. 5l s
Itothschild's Loan, 5 per Cent 9B Ta
Loan of the City, 1832, 4 per Cent. 95 %

German Papers have been received, but
their contents are of little or no importance.
VIENNA, MAY 23.—Five per Cent. Metalliques 99% ;
Four per ent., 90% ; Bank Shares, 1,231. Allgememe
Zeitung, May 27.

The news which we gave on Saturday from
Portugal, is• confirmed this morning. The
Duke of TERCEIRA obtained a victory over a
portion of MIGUEL'S army on the 16th, took
1,200 prisoners, besides a number of deserters,
cannon, &c., and followed up his victory with
such effect, that MIGUEL abandoned Santa-
rem in the night of the 17th, when the libe-
rating army entered it.
The gallant NAPIER was not idle. He at-

tacked the Miguelites at Villa de Orem, and
took the whole garrison, 800 strong, prisoners.

Private letters from Lisbon state, that after
the battle of the 16th ult. near Thomar, the
12th, 19th, and 23d Regiments of Infantry
deserted to Don PEDRO, with 200 cavalry
under General CUEZ. MIGUEL'S army was
retreating by the road of Aviez to the Algarves,
and Don MIGUEL himself was expected to
embark for Gibraltar. Other accounts state
that he was proceeding towards Elvas. In any
case, his career is over.

The Spanish Government, it seems, has at
length formally convoked the Cortes for the
24th of filly. The decree of convocation, dated
Aranjuez, 20th ult., was published in the
Madrid Gazette of 24th ult., and the law of
election was to appear on the following day.
Another subject for congratulation consists in
the publication of an amnesty in favour of all
the political offenders excepted by the previous
decrees, and allowing no exceptions whatever
any longer to exist, by virtue of which decree,
the patriot MINA, and all the Spanish refugees
who have till now remained away from their
native country, may immediately return. These
satisfactory and liberal announcements were
supposed to have been precipitated by a de-
spatch from General RODIL, confirming the
evacuation of Santarem by Don MIGUEL, and
the apprehension that he was advancing on the
Spanish frontier, in order to support the sink-
ing cause of Don CARLOS.

Letters have been received from one of the
Mexican Mining Companies, dated March 17,
stating that the country was in a disturbed state,
and fears were entertained of another revolt.

We understand that General MINA. takes his
departure for Spain in the course of the week.

Mr. O'CONNELL has addressed a letter
(dated London, May 28th) to his Dublin
constituents, in which occurs the following

passage :
" I cannot conclude, however, without congratulat-
ing my constituents on the prospects before us—pro-
spects which have opened upon us since my project of
a settlement of the tithe question was fully detailed to
the House of Commons. Let us, however, not antici-
pate too much. One Cabinet more is broken up,
because several of its members have totally refused to
do justice to Ireland. These refractory enemies of
our native land are at present ejected from power. It
refreshes the long oppressed heart to find the unrelenting
oppressors at length laid low. But who are to fill the places
of the dismissed? There lies the rub,' as Shakspeare
has it. There is indeed one consolation—we cannot have
worse or more envenomed foes than Messrs. Stanley
and Co. to deal with. To that faction in the late
Cabinet we shoul dattribute almost all of that ungenial,
and harsh, and heartless rule which Ireland has expe-
rienced since the formation of the administration of
the Whigs. When shall we have better? But, I
repeat it, there is one consolation—we cannot have
worse. In the mean time, Ireland preserves her dig-
nified attitude of readiness for either alternative :
readiness—cheerful, affectionate readiness—to meet
every measure of justice and conciliation in the best
spirit of lively and useful gratitude : readiness also
(it must not and ought not to be concealed) to
revert—should the doors of conciliation be closed,
and justice, full justice, refused—to revert, I say,
to her own constitutional resources. and to seek
for, in peaceable mood, and by means sanctioned
by every law, human and divine, that justice
from her native parliament, which will have been
refused her by the wicked folly and foolish
wickedness of an un-Irish parliament and an anti-Irish
administration. Once more I say to you, my respected
friends, the experiment is being made. Everything
favours its progress. The secession of the Stanley
party gives it a new impulse forward. I offer myself
to you to aid its advancement. If we succeed, we
achieve mighty advantages, and a new system of go
vernment for Ireland. If we fail, Ireland is too mighty
to despair."

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT,

THIS DAY, MONDAY, JUNE 2.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.

The SPEAKER took the chair at twenty minutes past
twelve. There was an unusually large attendance of
members, particularly on the opposition benches.
Mr. EBENEZER JACOB, the new member for Dungar-
van; was introduced by Mr. F. O'CoNNoR and another
Irish Member, and took the oaths and his seat.
On the motion of Sir J. DALRYMPLE, the Edin-
burgh and Dalkeith Railway Bill was read a third time,
and passed.
Colonel GRANT moved the second reading of the
Elgin and Forrest Drainage Bill.
Major BEAUCLERK presented a petition from St.
Mary, Newington, against the Bermondsey Water Works
Bill.
Mr. POTTER brought up the report of the committee
on the Mousely Estate Bill, which was afterwards read a
third time, and passed.
Mr. HUGHES HUGHES presented a petition from
the butchers of Finsbury, against the Islington Market Bill.
Sir 0. MOSLEY moved the third reading of the Staf-
fordshire Enclosure Bill. .

The bill was read a third time and passed.
Mr. PHILLPOTTS brought up the report of the com-
mittee on the General Steam Navigation Company's Bill.
Mr. PENDARVES brought up the report of the com-
mittee on the Hayle Railway Bill.
Mr. GOULB/JRN brought up the report of the
committee on the amendments to the Kendal Tithe Bill.
Mr. PHILLPOTTS presented apetition from the Com-
pany of the East London Water Works, against the South
London Water Works Bill.
Sir F. VINCENT postponed the consideration of the
petition of which he had given notice to this day week.
Mr. BYNG presented a petition from the inhabitants
of Fulham, against the Hammersmith Vicarage Bill.
Lord GRIMSTONE resented petitions from several
places in Shropshire and Surrey, praying for the protec-
tion of the established church ; one from Market Drayton
against the admission of dissenters to the Universities, and
several other petitions against drunkenness.
Colonel BUTLER presented a petition from the parish
of St. John's, city of Kilkenny, very numerously and re-
spectably signed, praying for a—total abolition if tithes.
The hon. member expressed his entire concurrence in the
sentiments contained in the petition.
Lord SANDON brought up the report of the committee
on the Liverpool Court of Passage Bill.
Mr. DAWSON presented two petitions from Sutton
Colefield and Halstead, against the Church Rates Bill.
Mr. BELL presented petitions from Woodhorne, and
St. John's (Northumberland), in favour of the established
church.

Mr. BOLLING presented petitions from Stockport,
and another place, against certain clauses in the Poor
Laws' Amendment Bill.

Captain WINNINGTON presented a petition from
Bewdley, against the payment of church rates.
Colonel LEITH HAY brought up the report of the
Committee on the Cromarty Harbour Bill ; also a petition
from a place in Aberdeenshire, against any alteration in the
present system of Church Patronage in Scotland.
Mr. J. OSWALD presented a petition from the over-
seers of the poor in the parish of Allington, Lanarkshire,
against the Poor Laws' Amendment Bill, and a petition
rom Glasgow against the same.
Also
Sir A. HOPE presented a petition, numerously
scfhruomrch o Soln Linlithgow,et a .
in
favour a
petition of
against the 65th clause of the Poor Laws' Amendment thef esta-
blishedom the
commissioners
the consequence of which, if adopted, would be, the de-
struction of the admirable system of poor laws under which
the country had so long flourished. A numerous meeting
rt
commissioners of supply of the county of Linlithgow,
of members from Scotland had been held to consider that
clause, and they unanimously expressed their decided ob-
jection to it, and had agreed to oppose it to the utmost.
Sir G. MURRAY and Mr. C. FERGUSSON cordially
supported the prayer of the petition, which was then or,
dered to lie on the table.
Mr. A. BARING presented petitions from thirty-four
parishes in the county of Essex praying that no measure
might be passed by that house that could be injurious to
the church. The hon. member then stated that there
was a circumstance connected with this subject, which had
given great satisfaction to all persons attached to the Esta-
blished Church—he meant the answer of his M
eajesty ttc)i
the address of the Bishops, in which his Majesty ,s,r_T.c.i.
his determination to support the Established
tation
The answer of the noble lord at
of the heado
members
r
de u s
of the Government to the p

of that house, who waited upon him upon this subject,
also given great satisfaction. The hon. member concludeu
by expressing his cordial support of the petitions.
Mr. C. FERGUSSON thought that in the absence of
his Majesty's Ministers, and upon mere newspaper
authority, the honourable member for Essex ought to
have abstained from making those observations respecting
the sentiments attributed to his Majesty to which he al'
luded, such observations ought not to be allowed to go
abroad, without receiving an answer.
Mr. BARING said he was not aware that it was irre,
gular, in presenting petitions, to allude to circumstances of
public notoriety connected with them ; and it was not big
fault if his Majesty's Ministers were not present. 11,
thought he had a right to make use of the declaration 40
the noble lord (Earl Grey) in answer to an addrets of 10
members of that house, being, as it was, a written answer+
and taken for the purpose of publication.
Colonel EVANS said he entertained great doubts of the
propriety of a body of the members of that house exPres."
ing a confidence in a minister, without stipulating for the
utterly
The report
1 lr.s
e.ye equallyp.ionretinconsistent
nm
adoption of any particular measure.
Mr. O'CONNELL said, that if the speech attributed it°
gsohttohetheeeohtshisetrenptartiyvitihn anothereither ereijawr as
his Majesty was consolatory to one party in one paragraph,
siistent with both. (A laugh.)
petitions were then ordered to lie on the table' ti;
Mr. BLAMIRE presented a petition from the toWnV
of Pendleton, for the further mitigation of the erill'
TYRELL presented a petition from the Protest of
Dissenters of Stow Market (Suffolk) for the reinoval „
their disabilities; one from the magistrates of Burthf,
St. Edmunds, in county session assembled,.against
seamen,w sl
IL su p and
o r e d
Poor Laws Amendment Bill.
Mr. HYETT presented a petition from the pitPalt
ppon
:eotinArlisiiirerrßbr.L.
syi
Pisley, Gloucester, against the Poor Laws' .Amenn"",Bill ; and one from Stow, in favour of the County t'''-'
HalCel.t.HvirAhPi
til
yI A, Na g
alp presented
thente dreaeilfreeteititiyonsyfrsotemnith. e Sip,
Mr. O'CONNELL supported the petition. •
Mr. LISTER presented a petition from the towt`shi,T
of Haddington (York), against further alterations in ta
Mr. HUTT presented a petition from Kingston' ens
Hull against the payment of sixpence to Greenwicoh,.„,gh
onet
hfreo
pme
tHi t
iuolnl praying,
i ford a'
_e - e
of
reform in the corporation.
th delay
in prosecuting corporation,reforms had occasioned some
those bodies to fill up the measure of their mischief, know'
comMrarissßioLnAerCs,laTeßonNteEndeddefetnhdaetdththeye
ing that they must shortly come to an end. tie e
i-
done their duty had they not been minute in their ifl ec
so
1 -
gation. The immense mass of information they b
lected was a proof they had not wasted any time
_,d in.
Mr. BAINES asked the hon. member if he eu„i"
form the house when the report would be presented ( , , ,
Mr. BLACKBURNE said he could not tell precise') s
but certainly not during the present session.
Mr. HUGHES HUGHES presented petitions from,
the parish of Holywick, and others in Oxford, in support from,
the church. wouldeolld ue
note ootflas.
Mr. ROBINSON presented a petition from the cor-
poration of the Seamen's Hospital Society, praying
that merchant seamen might be relieved from paying
sixpences to Greenwich Hospital, and that the same might
be transferred to the
,support of the Dreadnought sick sin?'
Also a petition from David Young, of Hackney, against tile
Poor Laws' Amendment Bill.
Sir W. FOULKES presented a petition from Dorset,
complaining of agricultural distress, and another from tile
same place, in favour of the better observance of the Sab-
bath. three
Mr. EGERTON presented a petition from
parishes in Cheshire against dissenters claims. from
Sir EARDLEY WILMOT presented a petition the
the
Birmingham, for a select committee to inquire P 4
causes of drunkenness.
,titian from
Sir GEORGE MURRAY presented a pe
_, Don.
the Commissioners of Supply of the count u' wrs'
barton, against the 65th clause of the e"pitbt
Amendment Bill ; one from the county
offronl the,
for an alteration in the game laws •
thees]) tell °1 '
parish schoolmasters in twelve arishes in pr
~Y_
500
Dunkeld, for increase of salary; and one from the
place against drunkenness.
'd not beliefe
earlier in the morning, explained that he
diused by him.
Mr. C. FERGTJSSON, in reference to ~Nhat occurred
that the words imputed to his Majesty were s
11_0 the
Mr. H. DARE deprecated any comment r'
opinions of the throne.
Pancras, in
kinson, of Swinton-street, in the parish of St.
Mr. WILKS presented a petition from William
the county of Middlesex. William
Mr. WILKS also presented a petition from
_,,nte,
Tooting Ecraft, of Greenwich, an M.D., and a 1-"'":, ox.
complaining that he was excluded from graduating ‘''_,ot, •
ford c r Cambridge, and one from Coggeshall, ag'
drunkcnness.
Petitions were presented by Mr. Bailey from Bristol,
drunkenness_ ; from the same city against the ro-
' t°l,'
Lacs' Amendment Bill ; by Mr. Alderman Thompson, frOo
the Chamber of Commerce of Sunderland, against the reel-
procity system, and one from the seamen and inhabitants
of the same port, to the same effect ; by Mr. Saunderson,
from Colchester, for the better observance of the Sabbath
,
'fa. dv°
oUr
Mr. Palmer, from Newbu, in favour of the Poor Law
Amendment Bill; by Mr. Humphery, from Berge _::
against the same bill, and one from Bermondsey, in
of Dissenters.
Quarries in Ireland was read a third time and Pa.ss''
l' left the
The SPEAKER, having gone through
his list,
chair within a few minutes of three o'clock.
Minesi and
The Bill for Encouraging the Working of