The Sun.
London, England, 1851-07-22 00:00:00

THE SUN,

NEW ORDER IN CHANCERY.

The following order of Court was issued on Sa-
turday ,
" The Right Hon. Thomas Lord Truro, Lord High
Chancellor of Great Britain, by and with the advice and
assistance of the Right Hon. Sir John Romilly, Knight,
Master of the Rolls, and the Right Hon. the Vice-
Chancellor Sir James Lewis Knight Bruce, the Right
Hon. the Vice-Chancellor Robert Mounsey Lord Oran-
worth, and the Right Hon. the Vice-Chancellor Sir
George James Turner, Knight, doth hereby order and
direct in manner tollowiug, that is to say—
" 1. That when any property is directed to be sold
before the Master, the Master shall be at liberty to order
the same to be sold at such place, either in London
or in the country, and by such person as he shall
think fit.

" 2. That when any property is directed to be sold be-
fore the Muster, the Master shall bo at lib-rty to fix a re-
served bidding for the same if sold entire, or if sold in
lots, one bidding for each lot, sod such reserved bidding
shall he made one of the conditions of sale under which
the said property shall be sold ; and in order that the
Master may form his judgment as to such reserved bid-
ding, the parties shall carry in before him such pro-
posals as they may
think fit; and the Master shall use
his discretion as to communicating such reserved bid-
ding to the parties, or any of them, or their solicitors;
and the Master, previous to such sale, if ho shall think
fit, shall clue to be put under a sealed cover, and deli-
vered to the person appointed to sell a note in writing
of the sum at which he shall fix such reserved bidding
for each lot; and in case no person shall bid a price equal
to, or higher than, the sum mentioned in the said note,
then the Master, or the person appointed by him to sell
the said property, shall declare that such lot is not sold,
but has been bought in on account of the persons inter-
ested in, or entitled to, the property.
"3. 3. That when any property is directed to be sold
before the Master, the Master shall be at liberty to fix
an amount to be paid as a deposit by the purchasers
respectively at such sale, and to appoint some proper
person to receive the same, who, if required by the
Master, shall give security, to be approved of by the
Master, duly to account for and pay what he shall re-
ceive in respect of such deposit, in such manner as the
Court shall have directed in respect to the moneys
to arise from such sale; and the person appointed to re-
ceive sucndeposits shall, within such time as the Master
shall appoint, and without any special order for the pur-
pose, pay the moneys which ho shall receive in respect
thereof (the amount of such moneys to be certified by

the Master) in such manner as the Court shall have
directed with respect to the moneys to arise from the
sal'. _ ..

"4. That when any property is directed to be sold
before the Master, the Master shall be at liberty, either
before or after such property shall have been put up for
sale by public auction, to receive proposals for the sale
thereof, or of any part thereof, by private contract; and
he shall make his report thereof, with his opinion
thereon, to the Court; which report shall be submitted
to the Court for confirmation in the same manner as re-
ports made upon special reference as to sales by private
contract. " TRURO, C.
"JOHN ROMILLY, M.R.
" J. L. KNIGHT BRUCE, V.C.
" CRANWORTH, V.C.
" G. J. TURNER, V.C."

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
GUILDHALL.

Mr. Edward Vaughan Lovell, a barrister of the Middle
Temple, was summoned before Sir C. Marshall to answer
a complaint of assaulting Mr. Patrick Lenaghan, also as
barrister of the Temple.
Mr. Sleigh and Mr. Thomas, barristers, appeared, the
former for the complainant and the latter for the de-
fend ant.

Mr. Lonaghan alleged that the defendant bad de-
bauched his (complainant's) wife, and that in conse-
quence he instituted inquiries into defendant's character,
and ascertained that he had forged a bill of exchange for
3,0004 in the name of " Wilson and Co." On meeting
him in the Temple on Wednesday last he mentioned in
his hearing the name of " Wilson and C 0.," when de-
fendant instantly struck him with a great stick.
In the course of cross-examination complainant ad-
mitted that he was separated from his wife, and that
during the litigatory proceedings between him and her
defendant was engaged as her adviser. He knew that
she had not visited defendant any where but at his busi-
ness chambers. On being asked how he came to know
defendant had forged the bill he said he had seen it in a
report.
Mr. Thomas, on the part of the defendant, gave a
thorough denial to the whole of this statement regard-
ing the debauching complainant's wife and forging the
bill.

Sir C. MARSHALL said this was a case that would
take up the tune of the Court unnecessarily,if ho allowed
it to proceed. It was evident that en assault had been
committed, and that provocation had been offered; he
then fore thought the moat advisable plan would b. to
bind all parties over in their own recoguizances of 501.
to keep the peace.
Mr. Thomas said he denied the assault altogether, and
had witnesses to prove that complainant's wife was lead-
ing an irreproachable life in the house of a friend, where
she was occupying apartments.
Sir C. MARSHALL said, if the parties thought the mat-
ter of so important a nature, they could settle it at toe
sessions, but he could not waste the time of the public
in listening to extraneous matter.
The parties were then bound over to keep the peace.