The Sun.
London, England, 1851-12-10 00:00:00

ii,t-Ii N Ig Sli A Y.

William BeAford, Brighton, cowhmaker.
J. Cinnberlidge, Congletun, Cht..aHre, licensed hawkr.
Joan Wit-Lei) Bowler, Gay wool, I.`:trlolk.
William Lloyd, Macleley, StAtTortlahire, grocer.
Robert Knights, Snape, Suffolk, coal merchant.
John Bradlaugh, Brdndeston, Suffolk, blacksmith.
George Mills, Aldby, Norfolk, eordwainer.
Jonathan Rayner, Wortwell, Norfolk, labourer.
James Knights, Snape, Suffolk, wheelwright.
George Marjarom, Framlingham, Suffolk, innkeeper.
Henry Lock, Portsea, builder.
William Page Hatton, Warwickshire, bootmaker.
John Beaumont, Adam Beaumont, and Henry Beau-
mont, Huddersfield and Almondbury, fulling millers.
William Brown, Hastings, hairdresser.
James Locke, Brighton, bottle merchant.
John Gaius Browne, Brighton, bootmaker.
Anna Conquer, Brighton, schoolmistress.
SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS.

W. Miller, Rutherglen,laker, to meet within Whyte's
Temperance Hotel, Glasgow, Dec. 13 and Jan. 3, at
twelve.

B. Gardner, Glasgow, grocer, to meet within the Star
Hotel, Glasgow, Dec. 17 and Jan. 14, at eleven.
A. Denny and W. Baird, Glasgow, merchants, to meet
within the Star Hotel, Glasgow, Dec. 15 and Jan. 12, at
twelve.

.... __ _
J. Gow, Patrick, victual dealer, to meet within the
Globe Hotel, Glasgow, Dec. 16 and Jan. 6, at two.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Dec, 9.
(Before Sir JAMES PARKER.)

ROSENBORG AND ANOTHER V. JAMBS HOLDER ALLEYNE
AND ALEXANDER M'GEACIIY ALLEYNE

This was a motion for an ex parte injunction to re-
strain the defendants, James Holder Alleyne and
Alexander M'Geachy Alleyne, from disposing of or
intermeddling with any of the moneys or effects of
the partnership of which they were members with the
plaintiffs, Mr. Frederick Rosenborg and Mr. Conrad
Montgomery, and from drawing, accepting, endors-
ing, or negotiating any draft, bill, or note in the
name of the said partnership, or pledging or using the
credit or name of such partnership.
Mr. CAIRNS stated that the facts alleged in the
affidavits on which he moved appeared to be, that in
the month of February last the Messrs. Rosenborg
and Conrad Montgomery agreed to form a partner-
ship with James Holder Alleyne and Alexander
M'Geachy Alleyne, in the business of working a
patent for manufacturing staves, casks, barrels, and
similar articles. By the deed of partnership it was
provided that it should continue for twenty-one years,
subject to be determined at the end of fourteen years;
that all the moneys, bills, notes, and securities of
the firm should be kept at the bankers of the part-
nership, to be drawn out only by cheque, or note
signed by two of the partners; that no partner with-
out the written consent of his copartners should en-
ter into any bond or guarantee, or become bail or
surety, or confess any judgment, or do or suffer any
act or thing whereby the effects of the partnership
might be rendered liable to be taken in execution, or
the credit thereof affected by or for his private en-
gagements, acts, or defaults. A suit had been in-
stituted to dissolve the partnership, there having been
last month an indictment in the Central Criminal
Court, which was subsequently tried in the Court of
Cueen's Bench, charging James Holder Alleyne and
Alexander M'Geachy Alleyne with having conspired
with another person to defraud Robert Blair Kennedy
of the sum of 7,3001. in bets on the performance of a
mare called Pigeon, they at the time knowing that
such mare was unfit to run from lameness. The de-
fendants were both fonnd guilty, after a trial before
Lord Campbell and a special jury, and a sentence
was pronounced of two years' imprisonment against
Holder Alleyne, and of six months' imprisonment
against Alexander M'Geachy Alleyne, but they had
both absconded. .The affidavit stated that the effect
of these proceedings had been to injure the cooperage
business, and that it would not be possible success-
fully to carry on the partnership so long as the delin-
quent partners had the slightest connexion with it.
It was stated that the two Alleynes had entered into
recognizances to appear and take their trial; but
they had forfeited these by absconding previously
to the sentence. The partners were apprehensive that
the property of the cooperage business would be seized
under Crown process, and they believed that their
partners (the Alleynes) were wholly without resources
from which to satisfy the amount secured by the
recognizances. They also stated that they had reason
to:suspect that the Alleynes intended to negotiate
bills, accepted or drawn in the partnership name, in
order to obtain money ; that they would probably
attempt to draw cheques on the bankers, and assign
their interest in the partnership property. It was
stated that they had recently written from Calais,
expressing their distressed feelings, and deploring that
upon their trial anything had been disclosed respecting
their connexion with the partnership, and suggesting
that the fact should be contradicted in the public
newspapers, at the same time hinting at the probabi
lity of a transfer of their share in the partnership to
another party. The plaintiffs also stated that a
professional friend of the absconding partners had
represented their desire to come to some arrangement
for the future conduct of the business; but the
plaintiffs could listen to nothing less than a dissolution
of the partnership so far as it related to the Alleynes.
Attempts had been made to find out the Alleynes,
but a messenger who had gone to the Continent with
a deed of dissolution, had been unable to find the
defendants.

The VICE-CHANCELLOR said he thought the plain-
tiffs entitled to be protected by injunction, and would
make the order in the terms prayed.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, Dec. 9.
(Before the CHIEF COMMISSIONER.)

IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH JEMMY, OTHERWISE

THOMAS SHAKESHAFT.

This insolvent appeared for further examination.
Mr. Sargood opposed for several creditors.
The complaint urged on the part of the creditors
was that the insolvent, being an uncertificated bank •
rupt in the country, had come to London, and traded
in the leather line with the opposing creditors, who
represented wholesale houses in the leather trade, in
an assumed name of " Shakeshaft." Such conduct,
it was to be reprobated, and visited
with
Mr. COOKE urged that unless the insolvent had
adopted a new name the assignees under his bank-
iwthas a
jucodngtmeneude.d, t
bank-
ruptcy would have been in a position to have seized
the property supplied by the new creditors. He
submitted this view of the case fur the consideration
of the Court in extenuation of the insolvent's conduct.
The ORIEL' COMMISSIONER thought the insolvent
had been a sufficient time in prison for any offence
committed in assuming the name he had done. No
doubt it would have been better had he told the whole
truth; but, under all the circumstances of the case,
he was of opinion that he was entitled to his discharge.
The insolvent was accordingly discharged.

ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE.
NORTHERN ClRCUlT.—Liverpool, Dec. 9.
NISI PRIUS COURT.—(Before Mr. Justice EaLE.)
Edward Wood was charged with having at Man-
chester, on the 25th of October last, feloniously killed
and slain James Gayman.

Cubbett prosecuted. The prisoner was unde-
fended. . _

It appeared that on the night in question the pri-
soner and the deceased were in the Nelson Tavern,
situated in Ancoats, Manchester, at which place a
club of tin-plate workers assembled, to which they
both belonged. Both of them were Irishmen, and at
the time were much in liquor. They talked together
for some time in a friendly► manner, and then the con-
versation turned upon the trades which their fathers
had carried on in Dublin, and as to whether they
were worth 2501. This created a bad feeling, and in
a short time the deceased jumped up and truck the
prisoner several violent blows in the face. The land-
lord then came in and laid hold of the deceased by
the shoulder to keep him off, and while doing so the
prisoner, who had in the meantime laid hold of the
poker, struck the deceased with it over the head,
which caused such a severe wound that death ensued
from it on the 12th of November.

His LORDSHIP ha;ingsummed up, the jury returned
a verdict of Guilty—sentence, five months' imprison-
ment.

Joseph Brooks, alias Joseph Stockdale, was con-
victed for having, at Salford, feloniously attempted
to extort money from one Samuel Williams, by ac-
cusing him of endeavouring to commit a nameless
offence, and was sentenced to twenty years' trans-
portation.

CROWN COURT.—(Before Mr. Baron PARKE.)
George Alcock, 23, was charged with the man-
slaughter of Louisa Teel, at Manchester, on the 10th
of October last.

Mr. Ovens prosecuted, Mr. Wheeler defended the
prisoner,

It appeared that on the occasion of the visit of the
Queen to Manchester, in October last, many persons
testified their loyalty not merely by illuminations
and the display
of banners, but by indulging in the
frequent discharge of fire-arms of every description,
although the mayor had forbidden it by proclamation.
In a place called Turner-street, a part of the town
inhabited by the labouring population, and which on
this occasion was densely crowded, the prisoner and
several companions of the same age or thereabouts,
were amusing themselves in this way. Many children
were attracted by their proceedings, and crowded
round to watch the various operations of loading and
discharging the fire-arms. Among them was a little
girl, named Louisa Teel, who carried a child in her
arms. She was standing on one aide of the street,
within the iron railings of a warehouse, nearly oppo-
site to where the prisoner and his companions were oc-
cupied. They had two cannons, about a foot in length,
which were placed upon temporary carriages, and
one person also possessed a pistol. The prisoner came
out of a house carrying a red-hot poker, and it was
deposed by one of the witnesses that there was a cry
of " stand clear," then r,the reports of :three pieces ;
and when the smoke which followed had cleared the