The Sun.
London, England, 1851-12-01 00:00:00

MONDAY EVENING, DECEMBER l, 1851

William Jolliffe, for Havre; Emanuel, and Baron Osy,
for Antwerp; Albemarle, ler Port Adelaide; Thomas
Arbuthnot, for Sydney; Perseverance, for St. Michael's;
Mary Ann, for Trinidad; Testadelen, and the Twende
Brodres, for Norway; Triton, for Ostend; Rainbow, and
Attwood, for Rotterdam; Calcutta, for Wales; Albion,
for Boulogne; City of London, for Dunkirk; Batavier,
Earl of Auckland, and Burgermeister Hyndekoper, for
Rotterdam; Lord John Russell, for Harlingen.
VESSELS SPOKEN WITH.

John Hamilton, from Bombay, Nov. 18, in lat. 8 N.,
long. 27 W.
Richmond, from Liverpool for Buenos Ayres, Sept. 28,
in lat. 26 S., long. 34 W.
Cornelia, from Batavia for Amsterdam, Oct. 17, in lat. 9
N., long. 23 W.
Albany, from the Clyde for Calcutta, Oct. 18, in lat. 10
N., long. 23 W.
Nicholas, from Rio Grande for Elanaburgb, Oct. 22, in
lat. 14 N., long. 27 W.
Caroline, from Newfoundland for Pernambuco, Oct. 25,
in lat. 17 N., long. 30 W.
Glenorchy. from Calcutta for London, Nov. 3, in lat. 2
N., long. 32 W.
PAngola, outward bound, Nov. 15, in lat. 44 N., long.
31 W.
Tropic barque, of London, for Buffalo River, Oct. 8, off
the Cape of Good Hope.
Duchess of Zetland, Nov. 24, in lat. 49 N., long. 7. W.
Maori. from London for New Zealand, Oct. 15, in lat.
2 N., long. 22 W.
Jessie Stephens, from Peru for Cork, with loss of boats
and spars, in lat. 40 N., long. 24 W.

Name of Company.

Australasia • • •• • • • ...
Britsh North American
Commercial of London
Colonial.. .••
Gloucestershire ......
lonian
London and County ..
Loudn and Westminstr
London Joint-Stock
Provincial of Ireland..
Ditto, \ew.••.,
National of Ireland ..
Nat. Provncial of Eng.

- -
Ditto, New. • • • ..
Oriental Bank Corpora.
South Australia • • ....
Union of Australia—.

Union of L0nd0n.....
Union •f Madrid ... ..

INS'

Name of Compaay.

Albion •• • • •• • •
Alliance Brit. and For.
Ditto Marine .•
Atlas .........
Argue Life • • •• • ••
British Commercial
Gen. Life
County
Earle
Eqity and Law ......
European Life ••• • •
General ••• • • •
Gl)be
G lardi an • • •• ••
Imperial Fire........
Imperial Life • • ••
Indemnity Marine....
Low Fire ••
Law Life •• ••
Legal and General Life
London Fire ••••• • • •
London Ship . • • • •
Marine •• -• • •• •• • •
Med. Invlid &Gen. Life
Monarch •• •• • • ...•
gational Lean Fund..
Palladium Life
Pticenix • • • ..... • •
Professional Life
Provident Life .• • • • • ••
Rock Life •• •• .•
Royal Exchange . •• .• •
Sun Fire..... • •• • • .•

Date Life ... • •
United Kingdom
Universal Life.... • • • •
Victoria Life • • ••

Name of Company.

Ilungerford•• •• • • •• ••
Southwrk .... •• • ..

Ditto Nw of 7% p.c.
Waterloo • —• • •••• ••
Ditto Old Ann. of 81.

Ditto Nw ditto of 71.
Vauxhall .... ... Av.

Name of Company.

East London. •• ••
Grand Junction .• • • ••
Lambeth .• • • • • • • • • ••
New River Company..
Vauxhall •• •.........
West Middlesex • . .

Name of Company.

Commercial
East and West Ind' a...
East Country • ....
London .• • .•

Ditto 80nd5•.......
St. Katharine ........
Ditto 80ndi•.......
Southampton ........

Dividend
per
Annum.

41. per cent.
51. per cent.
61. per cent.
21. per cent.
151 per cent.
61. pr cent.
61. per cant.
61. par cent.
61. per cent.
81. per cent.
81. per cent.
51. per cent.
61. per cent.
51. per cent.

61. per cent.
61. per cent.
61. per cent.
71. per cent.

'CH C

Dividend
per

Annum.

XI. 10s.
71. 14s. 6d.bs.
SI. p,c.& be.

138.6 d.
41. per cent.
7s. 6d.
spr ct.&bs.
41.
14s.
53.
4% per cod.
10s.

Al. der cent.
51. per cent
121. per cent

-12 s.
I I. sh. & be.
2s. & 2s. bs.

105. & bs.
10s. & bs.
15s.per share
4)41. per ct.

Si. per cent.
Si. per cent.
31. p. sh. k be.
51. per cent.
11. Se. k be.
53.
6/. p.ct. & be.
61. 105.
11. 6s.
41. p. ct.&bs.
10% ct. bs.
51. per cnt.

i 70s. per cent.

21. Bs. Od.
21. 2e. Od.

-'.&TEII-

Dividend
per
Aunt*.

Lmount
or
Shari.

X 8. d.
40 0 0
50 0 0
100 0 0
100 0 0

25 0 0
50 0 0
100 0 0
50 0 0
100 0 0
10 0 0
50 0 0
100 0 0
20 0 0
25 0 0
25 0 0
25 0 0

Z s. d.
500 0 0
100 0 0
100 0 0
50 0 0
100 A 0
50 0 0
100 0 0
100 0 0
00 0 0
50 0 0
100 0 0
20 0 0

5 0 0

81. per cent.
41. per cnt.
41. per cat.
51. per cnt.
21. 10s.

Sto k.
100 0
500 0
100 0
100 0
100 0
100 0
50 0
25 0
25 0
100 0
50 0
5 0
20 0
50 0

6 5 0
100 0 0
5 0 0
Stock.

Amount
of
Share.

Z. s. d.

100 0 0
50 0 0
100 0 I

70 10 3

51. per cnt.
pr cat.

7D OC

A s. d.
40 0 0
50 0 0
20 0 0
25 0 0

26 0 0
29 0 0
20 0 0
10 0 0
26 0 0
10 0 0
22 10 0
35 0 0
to 0 0
35 0 0
25 0 0
25 0 0
2 10 0
10 0 0
40 0 0

Price.

Price

Dividend
per
Annum.

'O7ICIC3

Anaonat
of
Share.

X s. d.
100 0 0
50 0 0
100 0 0
100 0 0

100 0 0

41. pr cent.
pr cent.
20s. per sh.
51. pr cent.
41. per cent.
3% per cent.
4%1. pr cent.
21. per cent.

Amount
of
Share.

SU
133

160
175.6 d

6%
221
209

Paid. Price.
--- —.
Z. a. d.
15
1E
a
GO 0 o 24%
40 0 0 21%
18

X a. d.

X s. d.
Stock.
Stock.
100 0 0
Stock.

Stock.

50 0 0

Paid.

X s. d.

50 0 0

8”4
143

VAINT.6:BI:es
01
2‘.; Dividend
Companies. loefs. 41' per Price. Cempanies. R per price.
' Annum.
c lAnnum. m ,
----- ---- —..--... —
S X
Ashtn& Oldh 98;71. p. a. 140 Macclesfield. 100 21. 10s. 50
Barnsley.• • • 160, Neat...... 1001 161.
Brknk&Abrg 1501 51. 85 Oxford.. •• • • 1001 131,135
Birmingham 40, 41. 93% Peak Forest. 78 I 31. 18e. 70
Coventry.. • • 1001 251. 200 Regent's •• • • 83' 11. 3s.
Derby ..... 100 61. 63 Rochdale.... 8b 21. 42
Ellsmrc&Chs 69 2N p. ct. 35% Somrset Ceal 150
GrandJunctn 100 3/ pr.ct. pi( Do.Lk Fd St 12
Do., 6 pr. Ct. 10 61. pr. et. 1 i Stffrd &Wore 140 281. 405
Grand Surrey 100 V. Os. 32% Shrewsbury.. 125
Grand Union 100 1/. 10s, 24 Stoarbridge.. 1451 20/. 290
Kennt& Avn 39 41. Od. Severe and
Lancaster . 100 Wye Ball. 126 21'Os' 24
Dee,ls&Livrp 100 201. 405 Warwick&
Leicester ..•• 100 51. 66 Birming. S 100 41. 40
Leicstr&Nth 83 41. 44% Warwick&l I
Loughboregh 142 701. 510 Napton..j
Monmouthshil
100 Worcstr &
M 1 100'
78 31. 33 31. 28
ntgemrysh' --100 Birming.
MaltnMwbry' 100 Wilts k /Irks lls. 6d. 714

ckAS.-X.IGHT AND CORE COMPANIES.
Dividend Amount
Name of Company. per of Paid. Price.
Annum. Share.
---- --_,
-,....
X. e. d. A. s. d.
British •••••••• •• •• •• 11. 40 0 0 18 0 0 11%
Ditto Provincial- .. li. Si. 20 0 0 20 0 0 18%
Brighton •• • • ...• •• ~ 51. 20 0 0 - -
City of London .. •• .. 61. 100 0 0 150 0 0 180
ContinentalConsolidat. 50s. 75 0 0 31 1 0 39%
Equitable -•• • • • ...... 50s. 50 0 0 50 0 0 2734
Imperial -..•••• „ „ 31. 50 0 0 50 0 0 70
Independent ... -.• • • 61. 40 0 0 40 0 0 46
- 60 0 0 50 0 0 -.•
- 50 0 0 50 0 0 -
Do., Parl. Preference 61. 25 0 0 710 0 •-
Phosnix .••.•••• • •• „ 41. 50 0 0 49V0 0 27
Ratcliff
.............Si. 100 0 0 90 0 0 -
United General ...... IL 50 0 0 50 0 0 1634
Westminster Ck &dared 31. 60 0 0 - 444
Ditto, New - .... •• 12s. 50 0 0 10 0 0 834
31.15 T OF SCOTTISH COMPANIES' PRICES
Dividend Amount
Name of Company. per of Paid. prim
Annum. Share.
_
X s. d. X s. d
Bank of Scotland
British Linen Company 81. per ,ant ~.. u 0 100 0 0 201
.............,..-.. ,r. __._ . . ri. per cent. 10 0 0 210 0 3/.lls
City of Glasgow Bank 61. per cent. 10 0 0 10 0 0 1134
Clydesdale Bank...-. 6% per cent. 20 0 0 10 0 0 12%
Commercial Bank -.• 71. per cent. 500 0 0 100 0 0 176
Eastern Bank.. -.•- 61. per cent. 25 0 0 10 0 0 10
Edinb.isGlasgow Bank 61. per cent. 5 0 0 5 0 0 4
Exehangeßnk of Scot.. 41. per cent. 100 0 0 42 0 0 8
National 8ank....., 64 percent. 50 0 0 10 0 0 153
Northof Scotlandßank 51. per cent. 20 0 0 210 0 2%
Royal Bank of Scotland 51. per cent. 100 0 0 100 0 0 134
Union Bank of Scotland 8/. per cent. 100 0 0 50 0 0 92
Western Bank ... -• •. 71. per cent. 50 0 0 50 0 0 70
Alliance Fire and Life 4%/.pr cent. 10 0 0 10 0 0 2134
British Guarantee
Caledonian Fire Incur. 101. per cent. 100 0 0 10 0 0 28
City of Glasgow Life 6/. per cent. 25 0 0 2 0 0 31. 15s
Colonial Life
Edinburgh Life Incur. 61. percent. 100 0 0 15 0 0 21%
!Eng.& Scot, Law Life 51. per cent. 50 0 0 217 6 3%
Life Assoc. of Scotland GI. per cent. 10 0 0 110 0 131. 15s
National Fire and Life 51. per cent. 10 0 0 1 0 0 258.0 d
North British Incur 5l. per cent. 200 0 0 20 0 0 27
ScottishUnionlnsnace. Gil. pr cent. 20 0 0 1 0 0 281.6 d
Standard Life ...... - 51. per cent. 50 0 0 7 0 0 1234
United Dep•Assurance 51. per cent. 10 0 0 1 0 0 17s 9d
MISCELLANEOUS.
Dividend Amount
INsme of Company. per of Paid. Price.
Annum. Share.
.....1111,0.
w.,..............,••....
X. s. d. X. s. d.
Assam Tea -- • • .... - 20 0 0 20 0 0 9
Auction Mart.. ••• • • • 21. 55. 50 0 0 - 2634
Australian Agricalturl 11. 100 0 0 30 0 0 15
Australian Trust •• .. 6/. per cent. - 35 0 0 20
knglo-Mezlean Mint.. 11. 10s. 10 0 0 10 0 0 24%
Ditto, Half Shares.. --- 210 0 -
British American Land - - 38 10 0 -
Canada ... •......... GI. per cent. .100 00132 10 0 49
Do. 5 per cent Bonds - - - -
Ditto, 6pr et. Bonds 61. per-cent. - - 109
City Navigation Bonds 31 per cent. - - 95
EGgenuitßabevleerits;
Ditto New ........ - 50 0 0 710 0
v3serlgnivenesryt. 155piper..liscbesn,t2.1 100 0 0 10010 0 0
190%
Gen. Steam Navigation 10 p.ct. 16 0 0 14 0 0 2734
Hudson's 8ay...... • • - Stock. 0
- 206
Hungerford ...... •• .. 21. ss. - 100 0 0 47
London Institution .• • - - 78 15 0 6%
New Zealand Company - 25 0 0 25 0 0 -
Ditto, New ........ - 25 0 0 12 10 0 -
Russell Institution.• •• - _ 26 5 0 -
Peninslr&Orient.Stm. 81. p. c.fcbs. 50 0 0 50 0 0 70%
Reversionary Int. Soc. 4341. pr cent. 100 0 0 100 0 0 100%
Royal Mail Steam•• •• 4/. p. share. 100 0 0 60 0 0 8034
South Australian .•• • • 11. per share. 25 0 0 25 0 0 23%
VanDtemius's lapicl.B rt 100 0 0 39 9 9 I

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT.
OLD COURT.
(Before Mr. Justice MAULE
The following case was specially fixed for this
morning, (Nov. 29), and the court was accordingly
opened at ten o'clock. Owing to some misunder-
standing, however, the jury, counsel, &c., were kept
waiting until twenty 'minutes past one o'clock, at
which hour the Learned Judge took his seat on the
bench.

William Smith, alias Glenister, aged twenty, was
indicted for the wilful murder of Mary Elizabeth
Reynolds.

Bodkin and Mr. Clerk conducted the prosecu-
tion. The prisoner would have been without the as-
sistance of counsel, but the Sheriffs, upon becoming
acquainted with the fact that he was not in a condition
to obtain such assistance, very kindly requested Mr.
Cooper to watch the case on his behalf.
Mr. BODKIN having opened the facts in a clear and
temperate address to the jury, the following evidence
was adduced :

Elizabeth Reynolds deposed that she had cohabited
with the prisoner for about three months before the
death of the child in question. They lived at No. 6,
Douglas-street, Westminster. About eight o'clock
on the evening of the 234 of October witness went
out, leaving the infant in the prisoner's room asleep.
It was witness's child by another man. She met with
a friend of the prisoner,and they drank together, and
sbe became intoxicated and was locked up in the sta-
tion-house, and was taken the next morning before a
magistrate, who discharged her. When she went
home she found her child covered with bruises, and
quite dead ; and, from what the persons i❑ the house
told her, she went to the Equitable Gas-works, where
the prisoner was ,employed, and upon seeing him she
exclaimed to him that he had murdered her child.
The prisoner replied, " You should have been at home.
I have murdered it. What to do I don't know. I
had better b— well go and drown myself." A
policeman was sent for, and the prisoner was given
into custody. (A child's and a man's shirt, both
saturated with blood, were here produced and iden-
tified by the witness as being those of her child and
the prisoner.)
In answer to a question put by Mr. COOPER, the
witness said that the prisoner sometimes appeared to
be fond of the child.

Caroline Lund, a lodger in the same house, and
occupying a room adjoining that of the prisoner,
proved that on the night of the 23d of October the
prisoner came home between 7 and 8 o'clock, and
by his manner she had no doubt that he was very
drunk. As he was going upstairs be called out "All
right" three times, and he then went into his room,
and very soon afterwards she heard the child cry as
though it was being slapped or beaten. The prisoner
then exclaimed, " You little wretch, if you are not
quiet I will kill you," and she then heard the child
cry again. Immediately after this witness heard the
sound of a thump or fail upon the floor, and then the
child cried still more violently. The prisoner made
use of very bad language to the child, and said that if
any one interfered he would serve them the same, and
she also heard him say, "My life is a misery ; I am
miserable; I know I shall be hung, and I may as
well be hung out of the way." After this there was
another sound, as though the child was thrown down
again, and it screamed violently. Nobody but the
prisoner was in the room at the time.
James Henry Walker, a shoemaker, living in the
house, gave similar evidence as to what took place in
the early part of the evening. He also said, that be-
tween 12 and 1 on the following morning he again
heard the child thrown down and beaten, and it
screamed violently. Between 5 and 6 the same thing
occurred again, and about 6 the prisoner went out,
and he did not hear the voice of the child any more.
About 11 o'clock he went into the prisoner's room
and saw the child lying dead, and dreadfully disfi-
gured, and covered with a piece of ticking. The
witness also stated that the prisoner was in the habit
of illusing the child, he had repeatedly complained of
it, and said that he would not stop in the house if he
continued such conduct.

By Mr. COOPER—He did not interfere because he
was afraid of the prisoner's violence.
William Miller, a police-constable of the B divi-
sion, proved that he went to the prisoner's room and
found the child quite dead and cold. There was
blood all over the bed, and the child appeared covered
with wounds. Upon searching the room he found a
man's shirt and a child's shit t, which he produced.
They were both very bloody. There was some blood
upon the hearth, and in another place it appeared as
though blood had been wiped up. Witness then went
with the mother of the prisoner to the gas-works, and
took him into custody upon the charge of murdering
the child, and he replied that he was drunk when he
went home, and that he fell over the child, and did
not know what took place afterwards. There was
some blood upon the prisoner's smockfrock when he
took him into custody.
Mr. Pearse, a surgeon, described the condition of
the child. There were sixteen bruises, some of them
old and some of them recent ones, upon different
parts of its person. The right arm and left leg were
fractured, and there was a very severe contused wound
under the left eye, and the head and face were covered
with bruises. All these injuries were of a nature
likely to be occasioned by the child being held by the
legs and dashed against the ground. There was a
quantity of extravasated blood upon the brain, and
this was the immediate cause of death.

This was the case for the prosecution.
Mr. COOPER then addressed the jury for the pri-
soner, and he endeavoured, with his usual ability, to
induce them to come to a conclusion that they might
charitably say by their verdict that the prisoner was
in such a condition of mind at the time that he com-
mitted the act that he hardly knew the consequences
of what he was doing, and that upon that ground
they might acquit him of the dreadful crime of mur-
der and convict him of manslaughter only.
Mr. Justice MAULE having summed up,
The jury, after deliberating for about a quarter of
an hour, found the prisoner Guilty of murder, but
they at the same time strongly recommended him to
mercy on the ground that he was at the time in a
state of intoxication, and that if the woman Reynolds
had been at home on the night in question the occur-
rence would not have taken place.
His LORDSHIP put on the black cap, and, addressing
the prisoner, said that he had been convicted upon the
clearest possible evidence of a murder of the most
aggravated and brutal character, committed upon the
parson of a poor child, who could not possibly have
given him any provocation. It appeared that he was
intoxicated at the time, and this was another instance
of the melancholy consequences that resulted from
the fatal vice of drunkenness. The jury had recom-
mended him to mercy, and that recommendation
would be forwarded to the proper quarter, but he
exhorted him not to place any reliance upon the effect
of that recommendation being favourable to him, but
to prepare, by a sincere repentance, for the fate which
in all probability shortly awaited him. The Learned
Judge then passed sentence of death in the usual form.
The prisoner neither during the trial nor when
sentence of death was passed betrayed the least emo-
tion, and when the Learned Judge had concluded he
walked out of the dock with an air of the greatest in-
difference.

This case concluded the business of the session, and
the Court was adjourned to Monday, December 14.
The cases of the persons committed for perjury by
the judges of the superior courts are postponed to
next session.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
MANSION-HOUSE.

Daniel Wilson, who was stated to be the keeper of
a tavern in the neighbourhood of the East India
House, was brought bf•forr. th. cue
fun,,,nig remarkable circumstances. Mr. Hobler
appeared for the defendant.
Mr. James M'Millan—l am a solicitor, and have
an office at No. 31, Great St. Helen's, Bishopsgate.
Last evening, between five and six o'clock, I made
up my office books and put them in a drawer in the
table where I usually kept them, and I locked the
drawer and the office door and went home. On ar-
riving at the office this morning, at half past ten
o'clock, I found two of the doors open, and saw a
prize-fighting man sitting in the office. I asked him
what he was doing there? My suspicions were excited
from seeing him, and I opened the drawer in which I
had deposited my books, and I found that my day-
book, in which I make entries of all my transactions,
was gone. In consequence of what the fighting-man
told me I went to the house of the defendant, and
asked him to give me back my book. He said, " I'll
do nothing of the kind, unless you abandon the pro-
ceedings you have taken against Mr. G. 11. Child," a
personal friend of his. In the course of a conversation
I had with him be said he bad been at the office that
morning, and had left the man there. Some high
words took place between us, and I told him that I
would take proper means to recover my book, without
which I could not go on with my business. I then
went for a policeman and gave him into custody.
The LORD MAYOR—Is the book produced here ?
Mr. Hobler said it was not.

Complainant—The defendant's name is under mine
at the office entrance, as he contemplated opening a►
room as a wine merchant's office there.

The LORD MAYOR—Had he ever used the day-
book ? Complainant—No, it was my own private
book. He holds a power f attorney from Mr. Read,
who formerly rented the office, and had taken the
chambers for three years, which are not yet expired.
He used to be frequently at my office, but has been
there but seldom of late, and he had been a client of
mine. I was told this morning what I did not know
before, that he had keys of my office. He paid the
rent of the office up to the 24th of June. I paid the
last quarter's rent.
Cross-examined by Mr. Hobler—Mr. Read occu-
pied the premises till the beginning of January, and
I was not aware that he went away in debt to the

defendant, for whom I was concerned in settling a
great number of actions.
Mr. Hobler—Were you not aware that the whole
of the goods were appraised to Mr. Wilson P Com-
plainant—l was not. Mr. Read told me that I was
to have the goods for what he owed me. Some pages
of the day-book had bee❑ written by Mr. Read.
Mr. Hobler—Had you not made arrangements with
Mr. Wilson that he was to find money to carry on
the business of solicitor, and that you were to find
the business. Complainant—Certainly not.
The LORD MAYOR—If you had made any arrange-
ment of the kind you would both be very heavily
responsible.
The complainant's cross-examination continued—l
was paid 101. by Mr. Wilson to pay counsel's fees in
a Chancery suit. Nobody had paid rent for the office
without being distrained on until I got possession of
it. The day• book was not contained in the inven-
tory which was supplied to Mr.!Wilion who purchased
the goods after the distraint was issued. It was un-
derstood by Mr. Read and me that I was to carry on
the business.
Mr. Hobler—Have not you And Mr. Wilson shared
and divided the profits of the business you have been
carrying on as a solicitor ? Complainant—Never. I
consider that he owes me between 50/. and 60/.
Mr. Hobler said that the tact was that Mr. Read,
who had been indebted to Mr. Wilson, was the owner
of the day-book, and that the latter had purchased it
with all the other effects of the former under the dis-
traint.
The LORD MAYOR said the proceeding was cer-
tainly a most extraordinary ene, and if such a course
were to be tolerated a man's businesss could not be
carried on at all. If there was anything i❑ the de-
fence set up, the defendant would be liable to very
severe penalties for having acted as a solicitor without
the necessary authority, and the complainant would
be liable to the ugly punishment of being struck off
the rolls. The day-book ought to be in the hands of
the officers.
Mr. Hobler—Mr. Wilson has a power of attorney
from Mr. Read to act in his affairs, and if my client
has done anything wrong it was wholly unintentional.
The LORD MAYOR—Then the book must be given up.
Mr. Hobler—My client has not got the book.
The Loan MAYOR—Then I must remand the de-
fendant.

Mr. Hobler—Will your Lordship take bail fur my
client's appearance ?
The LORD MAROR—Oh dear, no. If such a pro-
ceeding were tolerated there would be no security for
property at all, and the defendant must remain in
custody till the book is produced. I consider it to be
sacred property, and that the act of taking it away
was altogether unjustifiable.
Mr. Hobler, after some conversation with the de-
fendant, said the book should be sent for to the person
in whose custody it was.
The LORD MAYOR—Very well. The defendant
must remain in the care of the officer until it is pro-
duced.