The Sun.
London, England, 1802-07-19 00:00:00

DUBLIN, JULY 13.

YESTERDAY being the Anniversary of the glori-
ous Victory at the Boyne, according to the Old
Stile, and of the decisive defeat of the French and
Irish Papists at Aughrim, according to the New
Calendar, was observed with the ordinary tokens of
exultation -by the• loyal Inhabitants- of this City :
the Statue of the great King William the Third, in
College-green, was superbly decorated •with appro..
priate colours, and several loyal Societies pitratled,
round College-green in the course of the day, which
being unusually fine, attraCted• great numbers to,
view the splendid elegance of the scene. Litre in
the evening, however, a disposition to tumult was
observed in the persons colletled in College-green,
which, notwithstanding the most anxious exertions
of Alderman Starner, who intreated the mob to dis-
perse, increased every moment ; a' guard was sent
for, but in the interval the appearance of three or
.four Yeomen, in uniform, who passed along the
street, seemed to be the signal for the outrages
which ensued : these unfortunate men were attacked
by the• whole power of the crowd, and heaven to the
ground, 'while • some Gentlemen who interfered to
preserve them, shared the same fate. Major Swan,
who endeavoured to preserve order, was also knock-
ed down and cut, and the riot had assumed a most
alarming appearance, when Alderman Darley ar-
rived with a Party of the Castle Guard, upon whose
appearance the mob- instantly dispersed.—Some of
their Leaders were however taken into custody,
and measures have been taken to bring others (who
are rather of a higher rank) to the punishment
which they so well deserve.

On Friday, the 2d instant, a Troop of the 23d
Light Dragoons, commanded by Capr, fray, march-
ed into Dungannon from Armagh. Two Compa.
nies of the Elgin Yet-161)1es are at present quartered
•

.~. ~

CORN EXCH A:VGE,

July I 9:

• Tuts day we have a great many fresh arrivals of
English Wheat, but being rather full of buyers,
with the uncertain appearance of the harvest) caused
that article to fetch good prices ; Barley is some-,
what dearer ; the sale of Malt is rather dull ; in
Pease and Beans there is little alteration ;, of Oa:s
there is a good supply, but from the great.demand,
area trifle higher•; Flour has a brisk sale,andriear..
ly as before.

Wheat sos a.6os• a 72s od Beans 33s -a 361 od
Flue do. -73 s a 74s od Tick ditto - 29 a 32$ 6d
Malt -46 s a 455 a sts od Oats - 145 a iSs a 235 ed
Fine ditto '- 52s a 53s 64' Poland do. ' ..i,..; a 255 6d
Barley - ads a 355 Qd . Rape Seed 321. a, 35l per last
Rye - - 325 a 36s od Fine F ton.; cos `a
.55s per sack
White Pease 37s a 39s od Second do. 4;s a sas pet' do. '

'THE OP that remains in town of the:
Fashionable World were present, :on Saturday, at
this entertainment. The house, indeed,
.was full
as well attended, even with the strong cottnterl.:
anion of Parliamentary el/to:prizes, as is generally
the case at this advanced state :of the season. We:
have so often made our reports on the Operati,:
formers, as well as on the Corp de Ballet; tint we
have only to say PAR 'so; -by- her animation and
agility, proved that she is completely rcovered.
Her famous pas sea, or horn-pipe, bevel':, went off
with more admirable precision and spirit.
Last 'Saturday se'nnight a very melancholy, bar-
baron's, and unheard of ,cruelty happened at Corva,
near St. I've's, A woman, whose name is Brey,
whilst her husband was on his buiiness at a,
tin mine (where he is a Captain) and no One in
the room with her, took an infant child' of about
ten months old, out of the cradle wherein it was
fist asleep, undreSsed it,' and Lid. it on a red hot
baking iron, which was then on, the fire, then
throwing a sheave of reeds over the infant, set it
in a blaze; but the child, through the torture, was
heazd to cry veheMently,- which immediately
brought her' sister-in-law and daughter., Min were
'ln another 'part of the' house, into the kitchen,
where this horrid barbarity was 'committed. They
found the child- just taken off the' fire by this un-
natural
.monster, burned in a most shocking- man.
tier. A Surgeon and the child's father were itn
mediately sent for, but to no purpose—it laul
guished a' few hours, and then expired' 'in great
agonies. This wretched woman, it seems, has
been in a kind of melancholy for:.-satie inontl4
past ; and sometimes so outrageous, that her hos;
band was obliged to bind her 'for some days. Mr-4
they ; but that. morning she seemed to talk sensibly',
kind desired him to let herloose, which he•consenG
ed to, in an unguarded-hour: -The jury, after exa..
the Child, and 'its inhuman mother, 'gave a
verdict Insanity. The Mayor, who attended,
ordered 'her husband to confine her in future, and by.
149 pearls to let het-loose-again;

LAW REPORT.

COURT OF BENCH; Tuty 17.

r,

SITTINGS BEFOKE LORI: £LL.ENV..III6UGYi xs.avikrtnALL,

DIMSDALE AND (ITU E ItS L4NCHVTEk•

THIS was an Action for Money had and received
by the Defendant for the plaintiffs' •t!Se.
Mr. Gie as said, that the Plaintiff) 'ti-e'Bahkers
in this town, and the Defendant, Mrs. tanehest-er,
vas a person in trade in this iselecropelis also. The
fads of the case were shortly as (ollow
. .
A Promissory Note,dtawn by.the Peferhiaohc=irrig
to the hands of the Plaintiffs, •as bankers; tor the
Sum of 54.!.. I6s. which ,w‘yonoted for pota,payment,
and upon which there. therefore attaehed,a -further
sum of zs. 6d. It was noted by a Notary Pub!ic,
of the 'name of Adamthevelite, =who
.sent his Clerk
afterwards with the Promissoty Note to demand pay-
ment ; this Gentleman's name was Bannister. •. He
received the whole of the money for the note, toge.
ther with the costs of noting. . He immediately
marked all (the notes in which this payment was
made, and then delivered thini over, thesame days
to his master, Mr. Adamthwaite, who marked them
also. They were then all paid in at the bankers'.
On the following day it was discovered that one of
the Bank Notes, thus received of the bcfeodant by
Mr. Bannister, purporting to be a 191. Bank Notes
was a forgery. There was no imputation whatever
on the Defendant, that she knew it to be ri forgery,
bin it turned out that it was a forged note. Appli-
cation was made to the Defeodant for the payeueor
of this tole in lieu of this forged note, but she re-
fused, and therefore this a4ion was brought to re-
•eover the value of it. There would be no question
upon the note being a forged note, for iheCletkof
the Bank wopld,put that beyond dispute immediate-
ly., The sifigisvgyestioo would be, c Wheteer
this was the same note or nc.it, which Bannister re-
ceived of the Delendamein payment shook!
prove it was, and then the Plaintiffs would be en-
titled to a verdict.
11/THE-liniriister, Clerk to'.Mr. AdaMthwaite, the
INT`heziry.Public, said; he went to -deMiihd •••11'
pay! LI
'of a note for 54i. t 6;. and is. 61. for tke noting,
-oh the 12th of March last.. He received one zol.
bank note, three 10.. bank 'notes, one 21, hank note,
and two Ile hank cotes, Inall-a-guieea,'aMlsileer to
the amouro of 185.6d.' He n irked an those9otes
and delivered them over to Mt'. Adamthtniite; :he •
same evening, when he got home. He was quite
sure the notes he deliVered -to :e/lie t'Vlamthke'4ite
were the same that he recoivedeordie' Defendant :
he received it of a Lady, on her behalf; and in her
presence, who appeared to be her siste He
_was
absolutely positive, that not one of the notes was
changed ; he had no other money, nor. did 'he, it.
ceive any other money that day.
Lord ELLENI3OkOUGH said, the Plaintiffs must .
conned this sum of money received of the Defendant,
with some Count in the Declaration. • ._ •
It was then proved, that this money was received
of the Defendant on account of a Promissory Note
drawn by the Defendant on a Mr. Sav'ge, and pay-
able at four months, and held by thePiaintiffsi
Mr. Adamthwaite, proved that he' received the
notes, described by his Clerk, Bannister; on 'the
1 !tin of March last. He was sure' that the notes
were the sane he had received of his kir
he happened not to have recei vett any other thaed:iy.
He wrote upon every one of the notes 'the name' be
Lanchester, and that immediately on retelviog
them. He then looked at the not lb q~t sort,
which was alledged to be the foiged hne, amdflie
said, that it Was certainly one of the notei lie re-
ceived from his Clerk, his hand-writing:being' 'On
It.

' The Clerk'Proved it was the note he reeeiVedbf
the Defendant, and paid to Mr. Adamthwa;te
the. rjth .of March, Mr. AdamthWaite said; tie
paid itinto the house of. Baron pima! and.CO.
whose property the whole was,'• and that 'on tl& fol-
lowing day, it was discovered-to be a forgery.
Mr. Baxter, a Clerk at the Bank, proved the
rol. note in question to be a idrgery. It was made
neither of the• Bank Taper, of the Bank Engraving,
nor'was it of the Signature of any -Bank Clerk.
Mr. East;.tlra took an objedion to this forth of
the adion, being for Money had and receivedi—the
demand upon the Defendant was upon a note drawn
by her on a gentleman of the name of Savage pay-
able atiOur months, and which he did not pay, and
therefore the Defendant was of course liable for it
to the Plaintiffs; Who-Were the holders of it for a
valuable consideration. When this Note became due
-they.call for payment ; suppose .no part of
this Note was paid at all, the Plaintiff's must have
declared. on this Promissory .Note. ,Suppose this de-
Mand had been for goo Els sold and delivered, and the
Defendant had paid in bad paper, arid This Note had
been given for it, the 46tion could not he 'for money
had and received for the PlaintiEfs' use, it.nrust be
on the Note. It could not be money had and re_
ceived by Mis. Lanchester in this Case, 'fur she had
not received any,,money this Case—money had
and received it never coull ire, unless. is
,that the Defendant had received money, %.,hich
ought to be in the pocket of the P!ainti;FJ----nor
couhi it be money. paid, laid out., and expended
this Case. •

Lord . ELL E r:3O aouort said 01v...a person , who
sent into the world a ,negotiable instrument like
this, undertook to pay the sum due upon it,,
must be taken to admit that he has tends in his hands
.for. that purpose,. and .out -of whiA he iS to pay.—
: The whole amount of the Note was assumed to have
been.paid:by.the Defendant, but here,w-is of e piece
Of paper by 'which that payment was alledged to ire
-made, that. was .worth .nothing, and thercfor,!,.
thatamouni, "it was' well described as money had
:and:received by the Defendant to.-the.Plaintilfs' use.
His Lordship said. he. thought that the ad of pAy.
meta of the Note • purporied that the: Defendant
&money applicable to the .paythent ail, and that
.I,v.asiinor.,ey; which Was due to the Plaint'ilfs up,m
this. Note, and therefore whatever:sum was prt -of
.theAttholeof that payment, and not paid, was money
kept in: the hands of the Defendant; Which belOnged
toithe—Piaintils, and therefore was. to be.dega-Aed
-mpney ,had; and• received to the Plaintiffs' use ; fur
-ittsc-rtaia* 116 Wdshi2 khpuziu Ulm was, in

sul•.strince, nothing in the objealon to the form of
the AEuion.

Mr. ER SKINU then submitted to the Jury that
this. was:a Mistake on the part of Mr. Adamthwaire,
aloe Notiry,.and Mr.. Bannister, his Clerk, for. that
in r:-..iiry„ this forged Note was not given by the
Dcfletithitat •Banniter, that he must, Some how
p;her, have received it of somebody else,, and
supposed he received it of her ;, for that tlfe sister
of the Defendant paid Bannister-,this money, 'and
'she remembered perfealk well, that the Bank Notes
were .all new and the pqper clean, whereas thet Note
now in Court Was ragged and dirty, and not at all
like either of those which she paid.
Barbara Lanchester said,"she paid the' money to
Mr. Bannister for this' Promissory • Note of 543. 16i.
end ako the'2s. 6d. for the noting. She described
• the Notes to be, one a 201: Bank Note—three rot.
rank Notes—one 21., Note—and two 11. Notes,
• half a guinea, and •0. 6d: in silver, On looking
- at the Note in‘question,- she. swore she was con-
_

fident 'that she did not pay that Note to Bannister.

All the Notes she gave Jim were quite new ; she
did riot ithow, where they came from, her sister's

Clerk gave them to .her:: he was -gone abroad she
believed.•He left their house'ortihe i 3th of March,
tVhich as the following day after ' this payment
was made.

• Lord ELLENUOROUGH said, he thought this last
circumstance cast a little light upon this question,
pr raiher rendered it suspicious :how this Note tame
into the hands of this Clerk who ~vent abroad the

day following. this payment., If the jury: were
satisfied, they-.might save some time (which was
now .very- valuable in that Conn account citihe
•press of business before it) by saying so, without
bearing a reply froM'the PiaintiffsuCourisel.

- - .
• I. Quiss Saul,- there Was no bcWince in the
evidence' in this Case.

LOH ELLiNßokeitfouf said, 'there was certainly
not; and ithen the Jury found a Verdi& for the
tiff's, damages iol.