The Sun.
London, England, 1833-05-11 00:00:00

were I,enitth
eCleocvteonrts-wgahrodesnaid
,11 u„stNiAnTge
course 7-4
HomiousE has taken, but we would rat? Pru";
vote against him. If, however, EVANS iscol
hard, send to us at three o'clock, on the se.deri,
day, and we will lay aside all other consider
Lions and go to the poll." A tradesman Itilo
neighbourhood of Russell street, who was
hustings there
anxious to vote for Colonel EvANs,
tN
alarmed by the menaces of the friends 01,i
opposing candidate that he consented out)
support the Gallant Colonel, but being
to vote against his conscience, went OUt o
Another, near Drury-lane Theatre, Fail')
wish 'EvANs well, with all my heart, but
not vote for him. Why don't they give 119,4,
h i
by ballot ? we should then be able to do
liked." We could mention fifty other
thirg
a similar kind. t
It is said that the Government did io• 0!
forward to support Sir JOAN Hol3soVss‘diy
assert that he was a Government 01 tht
throughout. He was accompanied the e
hustings, on the day of nomination, by,it"veir
I
of one of the chief members of the u°OlS
ment, and by the influential persons 0°115170
with the Ministry, and the report which Wafe
forth on Wednesday, for the purpose ededt
clueing, an effect on those who had intee'nl;el,l4
vote against Sir JOHN HOBHOUsE, bse.
that he had not fully relinquished the riel
taryship for Ireland, was of Government iOt
This report stated that Mr. SPRING Illetlsos
been appointed Secretary for Ireland. ":",isoi
find that the office is still vacant, and t113.00r
(lays after the resignation of Sir JOlll4, frotl,
HOUSE, despatches were addressed to Mid° $0
a high department as Secretary for Irelani veo
the fair presumption is, that if he lin b(6I
returned for Westminster he would ha
l'
Secretary for Ireland still. 009
Then again, as to the reported juneti°/1„10
Tories and the Reformers—nothing c°,,715
more unfounded. So far from this l',C5P'
been the case, the Committee of 1-1011riol
in order to strengthen themselves with coIC,
support, put forth a placard stating that
had resigned, and in less than one 11°IVoir
the issuing of that placard, Sir JOOl4 alor'e
HOUSE rose upon the poll. This 11°,01,4°
will show how the feeling ran. rrile„ n'
voted with Sir JOHN HOBHOUSE as ap,
they heard that they had lost their ovvilipitier
The charge of Colonel EVANsS,
having impeded the voting, by rerinlr;',°,tioili`
administration of the oath, needs little reafroeo'
It was found that some of the voters kir to°
°
the other candidates were giving their .(itY
houses
which they no longer occupied, snitstitl°
administration of the oath was a Pre,cs-014
which the legal friends of Colonel PO' 3
bound to take. 'de w;
We are told that a petition to set 351, it
°
election, on the ground of inforntaiitn4o,r
the course of preparation. Is Sir tly
HOUSE SE fallen so low ? We can tell 111'rripil
if were to succeed in so paltry an attelighte!,
for which, however, there is not the s'n,,y
ground—and another election were 11c/cret9f'
place, the number of his voters would 'e
and that of Colonel EVANS rise in the,y
proportion as the latter rose between bisceo!
contest, and that which he has gained. , 01).46.
minster has done its duty. It has "sort;
from the thraldom of faction, and 01°1;0194
be enslaved. The lesson which the Go/eOl,l
has Pv received, is an important one. e
become P.
wise from experience, and ebf/
course. (ht

✓
We have inserted, in another colon' .0
Government plan of Negro emancipalin?;oll4';
it is of so complicated a nature, and 1°5,0/1
the consideration of so many calculati°flcelr
we should be unwilling at once to prort° iro
opinion upon it. Upon one very materje Cr
j
also, it is far from being so clear as /11
wish. We allude to the obscurity vvilicoool'
over the manner in which the 15,000,000
01
to be advanced to the planters. We '0 thy'
that it is not to be advanced except urio
roughly good security ; but where is r/to
from ? Is it to be raised by a loan, 0r,0016)
chequer bills ? The object of it is, we Pre',ggf
enable the West Indians to pay off ill-roe hi
on which they are paying a large 1)5,1)
interest, and thus compensate theallihd
difference between the interest
pay for this 15,000,0001., and that W"1
to Lit
are actually paying for a similar sign oi,te
mortgagees. If that be not the mode illercei
they are to be compensated, we do not Poiooi4
that the plan affords them any comPensoAci
all. We know that strong arguments ,5001,
principle, be urged against compensatil'folltly,
owners for the loss of a property tint Olt:
never to have possessed ; but, pottL",;011
other considerations, it is highly imp,, titoh4
the success of any plan of emancipatin:"bat pr,
should not merely promote the distrsre
immediate interests of the planter. %ve -001
fectly aware that any plan whatever eo .f)
denounced by the West India inter';
order to get as large a co mP ens
o ° 'eta
Pi p" ei
possible, just as the East India - 10'
raved week after week against the q°bel)l;,4
sketch of the new Charter, the rise in •
g,
of their stock 12 per cent. all the ei
the lie to their assertions. But 84hcisborpit
should on the publication of any plani'e Obe,
buying their estates at double their va'n 'verli et
the planters to growl a little, it is still)1101)
less, most desirable to leave them 11° goo re'
opposition to the plan of emancipati°notat, fool
they can unanimously agree. We do ntsios
sent say that the Government plan e" reles4
such grounds ; but, till the partieol3roill
ing the loan are explained, a doubt he Die
over the subject. Our contemporaryw/ plev
we see, imagines that this country but her
pay the interest of the 15,000,00°-/V; e ;1101
or wherefore we cannot conjecture. nett iol,pr,
think our contemporary must have.° heiveitici
mistake upon this point. We wan,!,foi potill some explanation of these dolt;
toops,v,
has been given in the House of C° a theP
well as till we have maturely considere
before we pronounce our opinion upo° Pp
• i
,•
ceedings, but a report, which we g V
It is not our habit to refer to
iivneali'n 600;4
part of The Sun, of a trial
this morning in the Court of King deem jib"
of such a peculiar nature that we._7,oovic,'ol
which tnneoctii),
an act of strict justice to express oolor-iety ctio,
many
our thorough conviction, of the pr ri!ndot, e
verdict given in favour of the clel.e_d the
_do
BARING WALL. We have reportethere;eol
dente at considerable lengthy but be gi4
fficierit e 0
but which of themselves were sti
rtopt
conviction to the mind of the most o,e o'torY. 05
sive person in Court, that the wn.°'_icts,io".ribli
by the principal witness was a la`
as bock
impudent and barefaced, as it t,
and atrocious. Nothing is easier t
minute parts of it which cannot to tae
,