The Sun.
London, England, 1851-08-07 00:00:00

yz,"7
. ~.
,--•
/2 :___:: Z. e-P------------c---)---
,-----
,
ib.
. .
____ /
`Nle-cloths, the part _ 7...• -..,
~. -.4?:•`'e.. . - ‘ -
••.f. . • * A v.,-„......„
(- _ , , , _
-in been cut off,
...__
.....,, 4.
7c,--7, 7,:. '
~ ' ,
~,,,,,T4:Li.7.
~,.,,,.
-,•:.-
, ' '4,l'
_ 1 - . .‘,' 1t.4.4,i'','..8,'C . -°., - - •Tj
-.. 't1,,,,-r. e!„ )
' 't
tl7 e- <0 he cloths were
.I, 1 ,
:. :''. -'-•-, ..',.-, .
, --- c.k'' -4*.,' '0 .. .144 k -. v ~, la ~, ,e r 7
..---I:r., ..,
house. It
, .. L,,,,,- -,--6,,.. \:, ,
~-' , _I.,- i.,__—__s, - '---._ •
; O.,
. ..
....71,:7---,
~: . ' -/,i. ~
Nutor, that
_4
..... t?' 4 1 :..';'* •.'e ,
..
.. . '', . ''''
''..f/.,i :,;‘ : ;-. I--. ' -‘
' - ; 71f . * /:/g \ ' '' ""
. -'.
''''\
- s '‘' ) .:‘
. '
' .1.4
. '
+ la were
.t,? . ..
11,1,, ' 1 ‘...,; 1 I it. 4 .v,..-- '- •.. ,--' *;9" ,7----Ibk ~ .. 5,06 S '7l'liii-• ' `• ^ Y.;,, tS' •
one Of ~.
/ .4 ^ *4' ),,,40'
- .N...._. e," ---- 11/4) //, .. , '" ''lrip r',...x',,,,,, .' '. ' lA -z- ~. -:= 1-1 -bit 0 , '.. '
_.,,,zfet „„) , qt,' *14., Diy,"ls , ~, - . 4. ~.//).*ll ;11N, 4,i, -., ,„-, 4,..- - IT,.
'ere
.... _ .
..
_... .
fil 1
... ..... ..
_: _.
~ . . .. ..... _ ....._.
...
.
. .
AUG UST 7, 1851. ii--1;, , "1
.).---1 —1,.: ',;l f
'!, '' ,
RICE SD.
LONDON, THURSDAY -'O, , _. ._
...- ~.., . , „..„
S U N 7

Soyer's, together wiVapkins ancliable-oloths, the part
on each article conta ning the matlits having been cut off,
and the cloths fresh hammed. Some of the cloths were
found secreted under a bed in the prisoner's house. It
appeared from a statement made by the prosecutor, that
since the establishment had beeu open articles were
daily missed, and he had lost not less than 60 dozens of:7
napkins, but since the prisoner had been in custody there
had been no complaint of any property being missing. ,
Mr. METCALFE addressed the jury at great length for
the prisoner, and contended that as two sons of the pri•
soner were employed upon M. Soyer's establishment, it
might be possible that the theft had been committed by
them, without the knowledge of the parent, and unless
they were satisfied that such had been done with the
knowledge and consent of the prisoner, he was entitled
to an acquittal at their hands.
The jury found the prisoner Guilty.
The Learned JUDGE sentenced him to hard labour for
nine calendar months.

- 7
A '
77:1'6 •••-
tj.
17!
N •

ROBBERY AT CR EI;LORNE GARDENS.—George Orange,
a respectably•dressed young man, was indicted for
having stolen a gold watch, value Si., the property of
Eugene Cuzio, a Frenchman, from his person.
It appeared that on the night of the 14th ult., after
Ulf., performance at Cremorne Gardens, there was a great
rush of persons to obtain tickets to coma down the river
by a steam-boat, the prosecutor being in the crowd, and
the prisoner pressing against him. He immediately
missed his watch, and saw Lim running away with bis
handkerchief in his hand, which he had no doubt con-
tained his watch. The prisoner and another man hastily
quitted the gardens together, and while running their
hands met together. The prisoner was stepped by per-
sons outside the gardens, and given into custody, but not
without an attempt on the par,: of the man who was with
the prisoner, by putting out his foot, to throw those
down who were in pursuit of him.
The prisoner denied all knowledge of the robbery,
but the jury found bim Guilty.
The Learned JUDGE had a suspicion that he was a
member of the " swell mob," and to allow inquiries to be
made as to his character, he should defer passing sen-
tence until next session.

POLICE
ANISNIOT:NET-HLOLUISGEEN CE.
.
John Kinq, a person in the employment of Mr. Bell,
of Jewry-street, Aldgate, clothier, was brought before
Sir P. Laurie charged with having embezzled severe],
sums of money, and also with having committed robbery.
Mr. F. Wood, pavvnbroker, proved that he had paid
the sum of 7/. 3i. I.od. to the prisoner, on account of
goods supplied by Mr. Be!!. Mr. G. Byford, slop- :eller,
proved that he had paid to the prisoner 10/. Ios. on ac-
count of goods supplied by Mr. Bell ; and Mr. Gould
proved that he had paid to the prisoner, at different times
sums amounting in all to 19/. 19s. for the same trades-
man. The prisoner had not accounted for those sums in
any way.
Mr. Bell having asked Sir P. Laurie whether it would
be necessary to bring forward any other case of em-
bezzlement, as there were numerous other instances
ready, and being informed that those which had been
already specified were sufficient for all the purposes of
the prosecution, said it was his intention to add to the
charges of embezzlement several charges of robbery of
' another kind.
Sir Y. LAURIE —To what amount has he robbed
you ? Prosecutor—l fear that he has been plunder-
ing me of goods to the amount of 101. a week for P, long
period. His conduct has been base and ungrateful in the
extreme.

Sir P. LAURlE—Magistrates are for ever engaged
now•a-days in hearing cases of robbery by servant:► con-
fidentially employed. The offence has become of such
frequent occurrence that it has been necessary to insist
upon prosecuting in almost every instance.
Mr. Bell—The prisoner was in my employment as
town traveller, and had authority to receive moneys due
to me. I had xcused him for 951., of which he was de-
ficient in his accounts, upon his statement that he bad
been very lately married, and had been involved in un-
merited and unexpected difficulties; but I ascertained
that, at the very time I was granting him the merciful
indulgence, he Was robbing me to a vast extent. •
Sir P. LAURIE—I shall give you time to prepare the
cases of robbery; but Inow commit him upon the charges
of embezzlement.

Abraham Simpson WEIS charged with having embezzled
money, the property of Mr. Foster, of Yhilpot-lane, tea
dealer.

The prisoner was carman to the prosecutor, and an-
thoriz,,d to receive money. Ho suddenly left the service
without notice; but, since his departure, he had obtained
money in the prosecutor's name, under false pretences,
so that he will be doubly dealt with after committal.
The prisoner was remanded.
William Tarnkin was remanded upon the charge of
having embezzled money, the property of Mr. James, of
the Poultry, filter manufacturer, to whom he was porter
and shopman.