The Sun.
London, England, 1805-08-26 00:00:00

hANKRUPI S.

John Edgar, of New Sarum, Wiltshire, surgeon, to surrender.
Augut 3,4, at six, Sept. 3r, at tt:n, .4sld 04,t, 5, at one, at
the Auotiope Sdrom. Attornies, Mr. Colin I-loci-
/ling, Salisbury ; or Messrs. Millet and Son, Terrace,
Gray's.l on -lane, London,
Ceorge Lambert, of Holborn, Middlesex, victualler, to sur-
icwier August 30, at six, It, act oa. s, At toll, at
Attorney, Mr. Ellis, James-street, Bucking.

hum-gate.
Richard Smith, of Latterworth, Leieestershire,,mercer and
driner. in surrender Sept. 13, at six; 4,and eicycn,
at the • flind Inn, Lutterworth, Attornies, Mr. Watson,
Lutterwurth'; ; Messrs. Kinderiey, Long, and Ina,
Symontrs-1 nue Chancery-la,ne, London.
Mirk Hughes, of Bury-ourt, Love-lane, London, wool.
to surrender Augu&t 27, 31, and Ott 5, at ten,
at Guildhall. Attorney, Mr. John Fore-strut.
I (Am Witti:ptii, of Leigh, County Palatine of Lancaster,
Cahinct-maker, to sortender .Sept. s, 6, and s, at
etev;:ii, , the Legs of Man, Pleston, Lancashire.. Atter.
Lies, Mr. lohn Tionghton, - Preston ; or Mr. Philip
thud, King's Bench. walks, Teittpke,.London.
Ilenry Hansom Angell, of New Don't-street, Middlesex, ha.
bis.latiltaroo surrender August 27, 3 t,and Oct. 5, at ten, at
Guildhall. Attorney, Mr. llerry, Waibreok.
George Dytlgsott; of Kendall, Westmorland, grocer, to sur-
reiiiier Sept. 5,7, and Od. s, at ten, ,at Guildhall. Ai-
torl,,..y, Mr T. 'C. Rigby, New City Chambers,
Atelkanil.!r Alwrdein, late of Calcutta, Eastindies, but now
or Lisle At feet, Middlesex, merchant, to surrender August
17, Sept. 7, mut 041 s, at twelve, at Guildhall. At--
tornies, Messrs. Ross and flail, New Boswell.ceurt, Ca-
tq.street.

L,..1:11:1
~..- LE ;1:C)...4...7'..,..'.

COURT OF RY, A. uc, .

E%-TARTE CEiRTIS,'E!: :%IATTr,II'

Tue prayer of this Pez.t.ioner Was, that Sir Mat-
the,:ll,Bloxharn and I\lt. Whitelocke might be re-
moved from their situation as Assignees ; that new
Assignees 'Might be thaiett„ to whoin the former
Assignees should deliver, • tip. all papery and. pro-
eeedings ; that it be ,referred to tile*Comthissioners
to take on .ac cuunt of the askts,; that Sir Matthew
Bloxhatn tad Mr. Whiteloe4e deliver over the mo-
ney and effeCts in their hands to their successors
that the Petitioners be permitted ,to prove their debt,
And that the costs of this "'application be paid to
them. • •

1110 ATTORNEY-GENERA said, that the Bank;,
rujit was a Merchant at Newcastle-upon-Tyne,
and that he was indebted' to the Petitioners in
perhaps a larger, amount than' all the rest of his
debts.

Mr. TtomlLLy, (interposing)—" As far as the
Petition seeks to have, accounts reviewed, although
they haVe been taken adversely, I, On the part Of
Sir Matthew illoxam, shall make no objeaion. If
it be to he contended that Sir Matthew has been
guilty of misconduCt, I am prepared to resist the
Charge."
I The ATTORNEY-GBNEAAL.-L." If Sir Matthew
assent to be removed, there is tie des'ire, from vitt,
di-dive motives, to detail circumstances of rnis on
~..;
The Lotto CHAS.bEr4I..OII.- You can anise a
new assignee in the room of Mr•Whitelocke, and
Such assignee, may review the account of Sir Mat-
thew."
The ATTORI3DY..GENEW.VI..--" It is material, my*_
Lord, that the account should he taken under the
inspection of the Commissioners."
The Loan CHA24CFLLOR.--" If an assignee have
adverse interests, it may be very necessary.to exa-
mine- his accounts y but tk, Court may take a mid-
dle course, and appoiht an assignee CO review the
accounts of the. former. There must be a produc-
tion of all papers, and the ,exarnination of Sir
Matthew Bloltham. and his:partnerS upon unterio
&nodes."
The ATTORNBY4GpiERAL."'" I do not know
that any :arranm
geent can more beneficial to
My client than that which your Lordship has'pro,
posed."' ' .
The Loin CHANCELLOR.-7-" All costs ate to be
,
reserved for future Consideration."

ir-parts WOODVILLE, IN THE MATTER 01, LODGE.
Mr. COOKE contended, that there were not suf-
ficient grotinds on Which to- support this Corn-
mission of Bankruptcy. The evidence of the ;A.&
on, which the. Commission was founded depended..
upon a person of the name of Dencock, affainst
whom 'a Bill of Indiament had been preferred for
Perjury, which had beet
,found to be a true
Ibis Lordship would not peimit a Commission to pro-
ieed on the,authority
.of one placed in such circum-
stances. The Assignees, in orderio harass the Pe-
titioner, had removed the indiCtMent by certiorari
to the King's Bench:. •
Mi. ALEXANDEIt,fOi the
.Assignees. —," The hi-
diament is not foundOupon the examination'before
Lord Et,Lnz,tnetiot.rwt,f but upon an Affidavit in this
Court." • •
Mr. Cootti.—" Sci'much-the stronger; beeause
precludes the uncertainty of parole swearing. The
objea,' on the other side,' is, to get rid of this Peti-
tion_before the Indiament is tried, ,yilichydur Lord-
.ship will not allotk.!'
Mr. A.LEKANDER.•••-"The Petition states, that the
aft of bankruptcy depends upon the testimony :of
Dencock; there is the additional evidence of Banner,
.I.yllo is not indicted."
The LORD CHANCELLOR.-.—" 1 do not think we
. .
should dismiss this Penton before the trial let it
stand over till after the lontt vacation." : • ,