The Sun.
London, England, 1851-06-28 00:00:00

RACING FIXT

Newmarket
Carlisle ....
Woodford
Ludlow
Lancaster
Worcester
Jersey 9
Liverpool
Mansfield
Kinneil
Dunnington l4
Stamford ....
Ilsley
AM
Ripon
North Staffordshire
Leith Subscription 5
Brighton 6
Leominster 6
Brighton Club 8
Wolverhampton ... 11
Huntingdon l2
Reading
York
SEPTE
Scarborough
Eccles
Warwick
Rochester
Lincoln
Radcliffe , 8
Lichfield 8
Cheadle (Staff.) 8
Yarmouth
Leicester lO

OCTOB ER.
Monmouth
Richmond
Calvdoniam
Chesterfield 1 Hereford
Chester
NOVEMBER.
Worcester

GOODWOOD CUP.--.here is no alteration in the
weights since they w« re last published.
ARRIVALS AT NEWMARKET.—At Armstrong's—The
Moor, 6 yrs, and EIIZA Middleton, 4 yrs. Wallflower is
put to the stud.

We are requested to state that Mr. Merry's horses
have left Mr. George Taylor's stables, and will be
trained for their future engagements by Mr. William
Saunders, of Hednesford.

Lady Evelyn was scratched for all her engagements
at 1.30 P.M. June 23.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

HOUSE OF LORDS, June 27.

_ -- -
The LORD CHANCELLOR took his seat upon the Wool•
sack at Five o'cluck.

PETITIONS.
The Duke of CAMBRIDGE presented a petition
against the Charitable Trusts Bill from the Governor
and guardians of the Foundling Hospital.
The Earl of Fr EZ WILL-AAA presented a petition
with a similar prayer from the Governors of Christ's
Hospital.
Lord WHARNCLIFFE presented a petition from
Leeds against the extension of the county courts.
Lord BROUGHAM said that each extension of the
county courts cast upon the judges more work without
any increase of their very scanty remuneration of 1,2001
Ho thought that the Consolidated Fund ought not to
benefit by the increase of business in those courts, but
that the officers of the courts should benefit by it. lie
thought that as by the proposed Bill county court
judges were required to reside in their districts compen-
sation should be made to them for the practice which
they would be compelled to give up.
Lord CAMPBELL presented a petition from certain
solicitors of Southampton in favour of the County Courts
Extension Bill. He (Lord Campbell) considered it was
highly desirable that the county court judges should
receive a higher rate of remuneration in case of addi-
tional business.
PREVENTION OF OFFENCES.
The NOBLE LORD then moved that the Commons'
amendments to the Prevention of Offences Bill should be
taken into consideration. He regretted that the Bill
for the improvement of criminal proceedings had not
been returned at the same time, as it was a measure of
great importance, and had been assented to by Lords
Brougham and Cranworth, the Lord Chancellor, and
some of the most eminent men at the bar. That Bill
had been referred to a Select Committee, but it was a
great discouragement to law reformers to know that it
might be rejected.
Lord BROUGHAM concurred in the regret ex-
pressed by his Noble and Learned Friend, who had
understated rather than overstated the pains and trouble
taken with the Bill in question. He was quite morti-
fied that it should have been referred to a Select Com-
mittee after the care and attention that had been be-
stowed on it by the judges. He wished to know when
the report of the Common Law Commission would be
laid on the table?
Lord CAMPBELL could communicate no satisfactory
information on that point ; the Judges had been pre-
vented by the delay from making many salutary reforms.
JOTEE PERSLIAUD.
Lord BROUGHTON said he bad attended in his
place in accordance with the notice of the Noble Earl
(Ellenborough) on the preceding night. The Noble
Earl had communicated to him the nature of his observ-
ations; and he (Lord Broughton) had not the slightest
objec:ion to the returns which the Noble Earl had given
notice to move for. They should bo prepared and laid
on the table of the House, as soon as possible. Since,
however, it was possible that a mail might immediately
arrive and bring further information on the subject in
question, he thought it was not asking too much to
rr quest the Noble Earl to postpone his motion until the
papers expected by the G.tvernment should arrive.
The Earl of ELLENBOROUGH said, when the
Noble Lord mentioned his wish to him a few hours pre
viously, he thought it was p-obable that nothing could
cerne to hand which would affect what he (the Earl of
Ellenborough) had to state on the subject. He has,
however, promised to give the request his attention. It
was very possible that the Governor-General might
have directed inquiry into the cases of tampering with
witnesses and other cases in connexion with the charge
against Jotoe Perahaud ; and if that was the
case, he could not desire to press the subject at present.
His only object was to get a full and fair inquiry; and
he abouid, therefore, waive his motion, in accordance
with the request of the Noble L ,rd. The Noble Lord
made no objection to the production of the papers, and
therefore he should go no further. He would, however,
take that opportunity of placing himself right upon a
point in which he had committed a slight inaccuracy.
He had stated that the recognisances of Mr. Laing, the
advocate and bail of Jute() Perehaud, had been estreated,
and his press placed under an "embargo." He did not
much like the expression when he used it; but he was
compelled to use it because it was employed in the