The Sun.
London, England, 1851-01-13 00:00:00

retersburgh bring lower prices, viz., 110 to 109 roubles
for August.

1347. 1848. 1849. 1850, 1851.
Stock this day .... •• i 18,597 22,358 38,0.03 44,452 52,583
Price of y
r ; 51s Gd 45s 3d 418 6d 393 Od to 37s 3d
'C —• • t 'to OS Od to 45s 6cl to Os Od 39s Gd to37s 6d
belireryla.st •
week ••1 2,440 4,294 ' 2,568 2,518 2,759
I
Ditto from June 1.. .. 59,834 66,257 6.5,405 61,233 60,888
Arrivals last week . 50 5,335 5,189 571 4,070
Ditto from June 1 ... 67,838 80,514 9.5,877 80,215 i 87,950
Price of Town ...... 54s 6d 49s Gd 4ss Od 41s Od 39s 6.1

CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)
IN RE NORTH OF ENGLAND BANKING COMPANY.
The further arguments in this part-11,,ard appeal from
the judgment of the Vice-Chancellor Knight Brun?, to
have the name of Mrs. Sou tlYwaite struck off the list of
contributories to the North of England Banking Com-
pany, occupied the Lord Chancellor the whole day.

•
ROLLS' COURT.—(THIS DAY.)
The Master of the Rollg, after disposing of the cases
of the Attorney-General v. Dalton and Zulueta v. Yin-
• cent, heard unoppos:d petitions and motions, none of
which were of any interest.

VICE-CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY.)
(Before Vice-Chancellor KNIGHT BRUCE.)
. The further arguments in the case of Eaton ?Y. the
..,,B.wansPaliVaterWorks, and the hearing of petitions of no
ihtirest, occupied his Honour the whole day.
(Before Vice-Chancellor Lord ORAN WORTH.)
His Lordship heard causes to-day after disposing of
catises of Utterman v. Stevens and Mayhew v.
~,all.llon, which were argued before him previous to the
../qnstalas recess.

QUEEN'S BENCH.—(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco, at Westminster, befure Lord CAMP-
BELL, and Justices PATTESON, COLERIDGE, and
WIGIITMAN.)

• DE PORQUET V. BERRY.
Lord CAMPBELL delivered the judgment of the Court
hr this case this morning. He said the question was
Whether, under the 9thand 10th Vie., cap. 99, sec. 128,
the cause of action arose wholly or in some material part
Within the jurisdiction of the Waltham County Court.
The Court was of opinion that no part of it arose within
the jurisdiction of that court. The facts were these.
The defendant, residing at Nasing, within the jurisdic-
tion of that court, ordered a ploughshare and plough to
be sent by the plaintiff to Nasing by the Eastern Coun-
t!". Railway, be (the defendant) having to pay the car-
riage. The manufactory of the plaintiff was in Essex,
sad the ploughshare and plough were made in
14 manufactory, and delivered according to order
at the Stratford Station on the Eastern Coun-
ties Railway, not within the jurisdiction of the
Waltham County Court. They were forwarded by the
carrier from Stratford to the defendant, and be received
them at Nasing. This action was brought for goods
• sold and delivered, and the plaintiff recovered a verdict
for 31. 10a. A suggestion was entered on the roll that
~tbe cause. of action arose within the jurisdiction of the
'County Court before mentioned. Now, the Court was
of opinion that it did not, because the cause of action
was Complete out of the jurisdiction, and therefore no
Part of it could have arisen within the jurisdiction.
When the goods were delivered at Stratford they were
delivered to the defendant, and he was liable to an action
for goods sold and delivered. He did not make any
objection,
and it was to be taken that he could not make
any cbjEction that the goods were not delivered accord•
Ing,to order, therefore the cause of action was complete
at Stratford. The Court was therefore of opinion that
the verdict was properly directed to be entered fur the
Plaintiff on that issue, and that the rule should not be
granted.—Rule refused accordingly.

: CRIMINAL INFORMATION.
THE QUEEN V. CHAPMAN AND ANOTHER, THE PRINTER
AND PUBLIAIER OF THE " MORNING HERALD."—DON
PACIFICO.
Sir FREDERICK THESIGER said during last term a
tale nisi bad been obtained on the motion of the Solici-
tor-General for a criminal information against the
printer and publisher of the Morning Herald, for an al-
leged libel on M. Pacifico. On an affidavit stating that
the circumstances out of which this application to the
Court arose occurred at Nice, the Solicitor-General con-
-I,alcd to an enlargement of the rule until the second
day of this term. Immediately after that application a
communication was made with the correspondent of the
Slarning Herald at Athens (the alleged libel being con-
talucd in a former communication of his which ap-
Peered in that journal), in order to enable the defend-
ants to answer the rule. They had received a letter,
dated the 17th December, from their correspondent,
Who stated that in consequence of the length of time
which had elapsed since the circumstances stated in the
alleged libel had taken place, there was great difficulty
111 obtaining the requisite information in order to enable
the defendants to show cause eactually against the
rule, and that that information could not be had in less
(h,
than a month from the time at which his letter was
dated
Under these circumstances he (Sir F. Thesiger)
had now to apply to the Court to enlarge the rule until
next term.
Lord
CANPNELL—Take a rule to show cause; but it
13 a pity on an application merely to enlarge a rule that
there should be a rule to show cause.

BAIL COURT.-(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco before Mr. Justice ERLE.)

QUEEN V. CORONER OF UPPER GLOUCESTERSHIRE.
Mr. COWLING applied to the Court to enlarge a rule
nlsi, which was uutaii3ed last term, calling upon Mr.
lirewiti, the Coroner for the Upper Division of Glouces-
tershire, to show cause why an information, in the nature
of a quo warranto, should not be filed against him to
try by what right he held his office. The rule was
granted on the 29th of last November, but it was not
'served till the 10th of December following, and the affi-
'davits tiled in support of it slumbered as many as fifty-
611e, alleging, amongst other things, that Mr.Frewin's
election was illegal, that he was not chosen by the
majority of votes residing in the district of Upper. Won-
cestershire, and that his election was carried by 450
...faggot votes. Now it was utterly impossible for Mr.
J3tewin to ascertain the truth or falsehood of these alle-
itatiens•in time to answer the rule this term. lie im-
pugned the validity of many of Mr. Musgrove's (his op-
Vl:Merit's) votes; but the truth or falsehood of the state-
rents contained in the fifty-one affidavits was not within
° "11 personal knowledge, and could not be• tested
Without Instituting lcng and diligent inquiry. lie,
Terefore, wished to have the rule enlarged to Easter
erta.
Justice ERLE said it was extremely probable that
t)ury would be required to try the case, and as it was
01y desirable that all disputes relating to the holding
4).[La 'public office should be settled as speedily as pos-
-1/I°le be could not accede to the present application. To
)°6lpone the inquiry till Easter. Term would throw the
matter over the spring assizes; and he could therefore
n,
• iier4Yril,enlarge the rule till the last week in the present
ti,! 11'. COWLING would take a rule to that effect, but -in
L.; event of the other side not objecting perhaps his
ter:l;lBE4p would allow the case to stand over till Easter

bp,M, 1.. Justice ERLE would not interpose any obstacle
;.""er those circumstances, but still it was highly de-
"lrahlt that the validity of the election should be tried as
,',„,
-welt as posiqhle.
.hold enlarged till the end of the term.
The Court afterwards sat at Nisi Prius, and disposed
of
several undefended causes.

„„-tACHEQUER.-(THIS DAY.)
e Court took the new trial paper to-day, but the
0 241 Y case hears during the morning was that of ” Tanis
Lei which involved no question of sufficient ge-
ilerai importance to justify a report.

BOW-STREET.—(THIS DAY.)
This.
morning a respectably-dressed man who gave the
-ewe
of William Grav!s, aged 63 years, who roused to
re his address or occupation, was charged before Mr.
a ;tit with stealing two plated table spoons and one silver
p" spoon, from the British Hotel, Cockspur-street,
I, Property of the proprietor, Mr. Charles Hickin-
uothaw.
The prisoner on Saturday evening last entered the
:°llee-roora of the above hotel, and took from a table
;a(1
wb:lilt leaving ° Plated spoons and one silver salt spoon, and was
the room when he was met by the waiter.
71
ath e Prisoner asked if Captain Wilkinson was staying
ere. The waiter told him he was not, and the pri-
()per, after thanking him, quitted the hotel. The waiter
missed the property and followed him. He caught him
t doors off, and the prisoner said, " 0 my God, 'know
heat you want. Here are the spoons." He then handed
Spoons to the waiter, and was given into custody.
The prisoner made no answer to the charge, and
r• HALL fully committed him for trial.

BIARLBRO'-STREET.—(THISDAY.)
RATHER strspiciotrB.—John Wallace was brought
beforeloitering
Mr. Bingham, charged with having been found
I?uternag in Old Bond-street for the purpose of commit-
„itog a burglary.
John Yoo, 309 A, an active and intelligent officer,
ukellosed that about a quarter to six on Sunday morning
" 641? the prisoner lurking about the doors of several
tradesmen's shops. lie watched him, and saw him go
up to the door of Mr. Holbeck, gold lace manufacturer,
lIIId finparently try the lock. The prisoner then turned
round, and on seeing witness he left the shop door, and
Walked towards Piccadilly. Witness followed him, and
stopped him as he was returning into Old Bond-street.
Witness then asked him if he bad anything about him,
and requested him to unbutton his great coat, and on
bledoing so witness perceived a large screw•driver, such
48 is used by burglars, project from his pocket. Wit-
ness took it out, and on examining it he found that it
Was without a handle, and that one end was formed as a
laten•key. He then took the prisoner to the station,
"here he was searched, and a knife, was-taper, and a
box of silent matches were found upon him.
The prisoner, who offered no defence, and who is
well known to the police, was remanded until Monday
next;

WESTMINSTER.—(THIS DAY.)
dune Gardner was placed at the bar for examination
• , before Mr. Brodrip, charged with endeavouring to ob-
taiurthree shawls and some furs at the shop of Mr. Par-
ton, Queen's-row, Pimlico, by falsely representing that
she had bean Aunt for them by Mrs. Moore, one of her
Majesty's houeekeepers at Buckingham Palace.
.The particulars of the first examination were given in
211 e Sun of Monday last, when she was remanded.
The Inspector stated that he had made inquiries, but
could ascertain nothing further against her.
The shopkeeper's assistant said thet they did not wish
pm the charge arky further.
;the Pris9Aer was then discharged.