The Sun.
London, England, 1851-08-19 00:00:00

TUESDAY EVENING, AUGUST 19 1851.

THE GREAT EXHIBITION.

Yert,,,rdv was the first day r,P r ht. op ,n:og at nine
o'clock, but few seem to have mailed cht mielves of tne
early hour of admittance. The police returns were as
follow:—
At 10 o'clock ... 3,478
At 11 o'clock 17 321
At 12 o'clock ... . • 30 589
At 1 o'clock 41.017
At 2 o'clock 45 513
At 3 o'cl ek 48 739

At thin arse 2 951 p-rsons had left, su that the
;reace,t number present at ono time was never above
6,000.
The therinomPter rose during the day from 62 t,) 70
The Atafue Eve, which arrived on Saturday, w..s
unpacked this morning It is represented hi a reclinihg
poAure, and is toe w .rk of 51 Van dor Ven, an gni,
eel-braced for his religious pieces. IL war execu..ed

The result of :he d,.libwrationa which we mentioned a•
having been held at (Morn. between tt,e iilustrious
onief uf the Outninibsion and several members of th•
Execu.ive Committee, b4ve bwc 'me known in part. Th..
Exhibition is to be closed esriy in Octob'r, with e
ceremony similar to the opening, in which her Maje,t)
And the Princw Consort will take part
The amount talt.n fur season tickets was 5/ The.
money taken at the doors from the visitors for the (lei
..mounted to 2.5061. 16s , making the total of receipts
2,511/. 16s. The police report showed that 51,525 ban
entered the building.

ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE.
TVEs 17-!;/?N Clii UI T ri,tel, Ally IS,
(B -fore Lord CAMPBKLI. and a Special Jury.)

FOWLIsIiV THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY,

Mr. Sergeant Kinglake and Mr. Stone werecoun-
sel for the plaintiff; Mr. Ball and Mr. Smith for the
d+•fendants.

This was an action brought against the Great
Western Company as common carriers. Tne decla-
ra.ion alleged that the defendants, as such common
carriers, received a certain box, containing a variety
of articles, to be conveyed from Bristol to Brompton,
and that they did not use proper care and diligence
in the conveyance of the same, but on the contrary,
let the box fall, by which moans the articles in the
s Aid box were broken and dainag-al, and the plaintiff
in consequence stwained great damage, and was un
able to carry on his business and calling as a lecturer
in natural philosophy. The defendants pleaded ten
pleas—amongst others, that the packages contained
4iass to a greater amount than 101.; also that the in•
jury occurred owing to the improper manner in which
,-he box was packed; and also that the b,)x contained
articles which ought not to have b•-en packed toge-
ther. This was an action brought by the plaintiff,
who was in the habit of travelling about the
country lecturing on natural philosophy, and
he box in question contained various articles
of glass and different apparatus which he used for
experiments with which to illustrate his lectures. On
the lit of May last, five packages were delivered at
the Great Western Railway station at Bristol, directed
to the plaintiff at 10, Montpelier•row, Brompton,
marked " glass, with care," and 10i. 3d. paid for the
carriage thereof. On the 31 of May, when the goods
were being delivered at Brompton, the carman let one
of the packages fall, and the artic'es which it con-
tained were thereby broken and injured. The plain-
tiff made many applications to the company, and
offered to take 151. for the damage, and 10 guineas
for the loss he should sustain in not being able to
perform his engagements to lecture in various parts of
the country which had been advertised. Upon an
occasion of his calling at Paddington, he saw a Mr.
Drew, an official of the railway; being rather deaf,
the plaintiff had taken a friend with him, but Mr.
Drew ordered him out of the room.

Mr. BALL, for the defendants, took many technical
objections to the plaintiff's right to recover, which
were overruled by Lord Campbell. The defence set
up was that the packages were safe when delivered to
the carrier in London ; and the carman was called,
who swore that he delivered the packages all safe at
Brompton. It was stated by Mr. Drew, the official
of the company, that he had offered the plaintiff 51.
compensation, but the plaintiff demanded such a sum
that he " pooh, poohed it." He denied, on cross-
examination, that he had ordered the plaintiff's friend
out of the room, but admitted that he had "requested"
him to leave.

Lord CAMPBELL, in summing up, expressed regret
that the small sum originally asked for had not been
accorded by this great company to the plaintiff for
the injury that his goods had undoubtedly received.
As a judge, he felt it his duty to expri,ss his opinion
of the conduct of the official of the company, Mr.
Drew. It was most unfair, most unjust, and most
liscreditable. It was a perfectly fair and legitimate
course for the plaintiff to adopt, to take some witness
with him. Mr. Drew knew he was a competent wit-

❑eas for the defendant, and he' also knevv that the
plaintiff's mouth was closed as to all that would take
place at that interview. He would not allow him to
have the advantage of a witness who could testify as
to what took place between them ; therefore he was
..ritirely at the mercy of the conclave of officials then
present. He again said that he hoped so unfair a
course would not be repeated by the officials of any
railway company, and he thought no jury would be
inclined to favour those who pursue-d so very discre-
ditable a course. His Lordship then went through
he evidence on both sides. and left it to the jury to
say whether or not the plaintiff had made out his case,
and if so, what damages he was .ntirlerl to.

The jury found for the plKintiff—Damages 451.
Lord CAMPBELL then said that this was :he last
case of the circuit; and he was so much pleased with
the manner in which the business had been conducted
4t Bristol, and with the intelligence of its juries, that
ne should have much pleasure in coiniog here again
next summer.

NORTH WALES CIRCUIT. —Chester, Aug. 16.
CROWN couit r.—(Befora Mr. Ju)tice TAL

FOUB.D.)
William Doran and Thomas Sharpies were in,
dieted for warehouse-breaking at Macclesfield, and
stealing a quantity of manufactured silks, the pro-
perty of Goldthorpe, Hoy ley, and Co., and Thomas
Fenton stood ctiarged with receiving the same, know-
ing the goods to be stolen.
Mr. Trafford and Mr. Wynne Ffoulkes appeared
for the prosecution ; and the prisoners, who severed
in their defences, were represented by Messrs. M'ln•
ryre, Brandt, and Sweetenham.
The case presented no features of general interest.
It appeared that shortly after the warehouse was
broken open and the goods stolen, a quantity of the
property was found by the police in possession of the
prisoner Fenton, who carried on the business of a ge-
neral broker in Manchester. He at first gave unsa-
tisfactory accounts of the manner in which he became
possessed of the goods, but eventually he stated that
he bought the goods of the prisoners Doran and
Sharpies, who had been introduced to him by a con-
federate named Shaw. They were all apprehended,
and Shaw being admitted approver, and his story
corroborated in some material points by others, they
were all found guilty. Doran and Sharpies were
then sentenced to eighteen months' imprisonment and
hard labour, and Fenton to be transported for seven
years." With this clossd the business of these assizes,
The boy Skeen, aged 9 years, who pleaded guilty to
an indictment for placing a dangerous obstruction on
the rails of the London and North-Western Railway,
as reported on a former day, was sentenced to nine
months' imprisonment.

NISI PRIUS COURT.—(Before Mr. Justice
WIGHTMAN and a Special Jury.)

BOSTOCK V. TUE NORTII .4TAFFORDSUIRE RAILWAY

COMPANY.

This action was of a rattler novel character, being
directed by Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce, to ascer-
tain the right of the defendants to hold regattas and
other public amusements on the Rudyard Reservoir
or Lae, near Leek, in thi., county.
Mr. Evans, Q.O , Mr. Weisby, and Mr. Pulling
sppeared for the plaintiff; Mr. Grove and Mr. B-avau
for the defendants.

Mr. Evans stared that the plaintiff, Miss Bostock
was a lady of rank and family, living at Cliffs-park.
eear Leek, in this county, an estate of great beauty
.and value, situate on the borders of the princely,
sequestered reservoir or lake, which formed the
subject of the present dispute. Miss Bostock de-
rived the property from a Mr. Haworth, who had
built the mansion-house and laid out the grounds
many years ago, and the property had le-fore belonged
co his ancestors. The defendants were possessed o'
the property of the now defunct Trent and Mer-
s .y Canal Company, who, having been authorised in
1766 to form a canal, obtained powers in 1797
form a reservoir of water for feeding the said cenel
and formed in the Rudyard Valley the reservoir which
formed the subject of this action. By the Acts of
Parliament of the company, they were authorisA
only to use the canal for the purposes of navigation,
and the reservoir for the purpose of supplying the
canal with water, the rights of fishing, shooting,
digging mineral, using pleasure boats, and a number
of other rights being expressly reserved to the neigh-
bouring landowners. The reservoir had been gra-
dually extended over the valley until it formed an
extensive lake two miles in length, copiously supplied
with fish and water-fowl, and became an extremely
picturesque object in the valley, in the midst of which
stood the pleinziff's mansion and park, beautifully si-
tuated and remarkably retired. Se matters remained
until the present year, when the North Staffordshire
Railway Company thought proper to make up their
then dividends by advertising in flaming handbills a se-
ries of cheap excursions along their line to the Rudyard
Lake, a regatta to be held on Easter Monday, with
sports of all kinds, music, steam-boats, firing of guns,
Itn. Miss Bostock and several of the neighbouring land-
owners expostulated, but without avail. The regatta
took place, and with an invasion of 6,000 people of all
kinds from the manufacturing districts the jury might
imagine how little the privacy and comfort of the
plaintiff could be consulted. The vast crowd came,
the quiet reservoir became a scene of tumult, amid
the hissing of the steam-boats, the firing of! guns, and
the shouts of the people. Miss Bostock 's park was
unreservedly trespassed upon, crowds scaled the walls
and fences of the park, broke down the trees, and, last
though not least, openly insulted, by obscene and
abusive language, Miss Bostock and her friends.
The company's agents were expostulated with, but
without avail, and a long correspondence took place,
which, however, did not end in any very satisfactory
manner. On Whit Monday, however, the company
advertised a second cheap excursion to Rudyard
Lake, and Miss Bostock s friends took the alarm, and
commenced the necessary proceedings to obtain an
injunction, which, however, could not be applied for
in due time to save the fete being held, and it was
arranged to postpone the application. The second
regatta was therefore held, and the same consequences
nearly ensued as those already described as having
taken place on Easter Monday. In June the motion
was made for an injunction, and the Vice-Chancellor
K. Bruce directed the present action to be brought to
try the right; the defendants undertaking in the
mean time not to hold regattas or public amusements
of any kind on the lake until the present action was
tried. Miss B 'stock did not now ask for damages,
hut she confidently looked for such a verdict as
would secure her property from the serious injury it
would sustain by a continuance of the defendants'
conduct.

Several witnesses were then called, who reposed to

the facts s.nted in the opning speech of the Learned
Counl.

Mr. GROVE, for the defendants, in a v,ry able
speech, denounced the attempt of the plaintiff to pre-
vent the amusements of the humbler classes. He said
that the only object of the plaintiff was to obtain a
pecuniary compensation from the company, and he
maintained that the defend ints had a perfect right to
use the 14ke, their own property, in any way they
thought pr,.par.__

,
Mr. Justice WIGHTALAN told the jury that with re-
gard to the rights of property he Thought The de-
fendants had made out tneir ,nd it was for the
jury to say whether in the use of that property the
der:Tv-lints had interfered With the plaintiff's undv-
pored right of tithing over the lake, or had been The
means of causing such annoyance to The plaintiff as
would amount to a ouisance. The law would clearly
deem it to he a nuisance in any way to collect such
crowds of people in the neighhourh.iod of a mar's
bowie as to obstruct the thoroughfare, or to incom-
mode him in the enjoyment of his home.
Toe jury were absent for about three hours, when
they returned into court and announced They could
not agree; and ultimately, by arrangement between
the counsel, it was afire.-d that they should he dis-
charged ; the defendants' undertaking to be continued
until a further order of the Court could be obtained.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
WANDS WO
THE ROBBERIES ON THE LONDON AND S•'Urn-
WESTERN RAILWAY.--Charles Whitcher, aged 40
years, a greengrocer, of No. 14, COureb row, AA-
gate, was again brought before Mr Beadon, for re-
examination, on various charges of robbery of valu-
able property to the extent of several hundred pounds
from the above line of railway.
Mr. Games was present to defend the prisoner.
Mr. Crombie (from the office of Messrs. Benham
and Co., the South-Western Railway solicitors) said
he intended on that occasion to open a new case
against the prisoner for being cone rued in the rob-
bery of a quantity of ribbons. Mr Saward, a linen-
draper, of the Commercial-road East ( who has been
liberated from custody on substantial bail until the
26th instant, on the charge of having received a por-
tion of the stolen property—namely, the mousselines
de laine and merinos), had purchased a quantity of
them, and when the officers applied to him for that
information necessary to complete the charge, they
received nothing but abuse, and his conduct was quite
contrary to what was expected. Under these circum-
stances, he did not think it advisable to enter into
that case at present.
The only additional witness examined was
Richard Curtis, who stated that he managed the
business of Mr. James Taylor, a calico printer, of
Wood-street, Cheapside. In December last he re-
ceived advises from his employer's brother, at Ring-
wood, Hampshire, that a box containing a quantity
of hosiery and gloves would be sent to them by the
South-Western Railway. Witness did not receive
the box, and he accordingly wrote to Mr. Taylor,
who sent word by return of post that the box of ho-
siery and gloves had been sent by the rail way in the
usual manner. Witness made inquiries of M-ssrs.
Chaplin and Horne, the carriers, and also at the ‘Va-
tarloo station, and on the 20th of the same month a
box was delivered at their premises in Wood-street.
On opening the box it was found to contain, instead
of the hosiery and gloves, an empty box, and a tin
oil-can.

The box (it will be remPmbered that some of the
witnesses stated ou the last occasion that the box was
lying about the goods station, at Nine Elms, for se,
eerai days, and was considered as an empty one) was
produced, and the witness ideal Wed it as the same one
th-Lt was brought to their premises. He also stated
that the box was the one that had been sent from
Ringwood, and which ought to have contained the
hosiery and gloves.
In answer to a question fro'n Mr. Games,
Mr. Cro nbie said that evidence would in substance
complete the hosiery case against the prisoner. He
should not bind himself down not to prodace any
other witnesses in the case ; hut if there were any
fresh ones to examine be would send and give him
notice.

Mr. BEADON obs4rved there would be the prisoner
Plarnpin to examine on the next occa•ion, and he
would have to give evidence in ail the robberies.
Mr. Crombie then applied for soother remand.
Mr. BeADON said he would remand the prisoner
until Tuesday, the 26th instant, the day app anted for
the final examination of Seward, and he hoped the
railway authorities would come prepared to complete
the whole of the cases. He should devote the entire
day to the matter, as the other court would be pre.
sided over by Mr. Long.
Mr. Crombie was of opinion that the clerk would
be more than one day in reducing the minutes of the
depositions.

Mr.
BEADON said he would give as much time to
the cases as it was possible. He was quite alone at
that court, his colleague, Mr. Poynter, having taken
his holidays.
_ _

Mr. Crombie said a habeas corpus was lodged on
Saturday last for the production of the prisoner
Plarnpin, who would be brought to that court from
Winchester Gaol on Tuesday morning, the 26th inst.,
in time to give evidence against the prisoner.
Tne prisoner was then removed in custody.
Mr. Crombie applied for a summons for the attend-
ance of the witness Senior, the landlord of the Black
Dog public-house, Crown-street, Finsbury, who
gave such doubtful evidence in respect to the alleged
introduction of Plampin to Saward.
Mr. BEADON immediately granted the summons.

THE CHARGE OF CONSPIRACY AND
:CHEATING AT PLAY AT BRIGHTON.
An application was made yesterday at the Town-
hall, Brighton, on the part of two of the prisoners
charged in the above case, viz., J. Broome and
Staden.

The magistrates present were the chairman (C.
Carpenter, Esq.) and J. Borrer, Esq,
Mr. Sill, on the part of the prosecution, stared that
he had received notice from Mr. Lewis, that Charles
James Kemp, of the Queen Elizabeth Tavern,
Asylum-road, Old Kent-road, licensed victualler, and
Samuel Genese, of 125, Jermyn-street, St. James's,
dealer in jewellery, would he proposed as bail on the
part of Broome; and that William Sparks, described
as of 25. Oxenden street, Haymarket, builder, and
Henry Nottidge, described as of 2, Allington-street,
Pimlico, gentleman, would be proposed as bail on the
part of Staden. No notice of bail, it was stated, haci
been given on the part of the other prisoner, James.
The parties named as bail were then called, but
none appeared, although notice was given for one
o'clock, ami it was then half past that hour.
Mr. Sill said he bad no wish to take the parties by
surprise, and that he would wait for any length of
time the Court might think reasonable.
Mr. L-wis said ttiat one of the bail, Mr. Genese,
had been in court, and would, no doubt, presently
make his appearance.
Mr. Genese shortly afterwards entered the court,
and having been sworn, said that he wis a dealer in
jewellery, and resided at 125, Jerrnyti street, St,,
James's ; that he was a boos-keeper there, and was
worth 1001., after the payment of all his debts. He
stated that the lease of his house and his furniture was
worth somewhere about 5001, and that his stock of
jewellery, watches, clocks, and silver Was worth
about 700/. or 800/.

Mr. Sill then proceeded to cross-examine the wit-ness,
- and in answer to his questions, the witness
stated that he had been five or six years in a small
way of business, and that he had been for the last
seven years in a large way ; also, that he dealt in
such jewellery as csme into the market from pawn-
brokers' sales, besides others. He farther add-d that
he did not keep a jeweller's shop, but that he kept a
coffee-shop and chop-house, and that he did his jewel-
lery business in the back room adjoining his shop,
end on the first filar.

After answering several questions as to the nature
and the value of his stock, the examination proceeded
as follows :

Have you ever been convicted by the Inland
Board of Excise for selling spirits without a licence?
—I was.
Did the sale of those spirits take place at 125, Jer-
myn-street ?—lt did.
Is not your house, 125, Jermyn-street, the nightly
resort of •prostitutes P—Well, there are men and
women come there. I have no right to say they are
prostitutes.

Don't you know that these men and women are
gamblers and prostitutes ?—No. I know the gentle-
men who come to my house not to be gamblers ; they
are men of property and gentlemen.
Are not the women reputed prostitutes ?—I object
to answer that question.
Do the police ever visit your house ?—.Every night
nearly ; and I have been there nearly three years and
nev r had a complaint against me.
Did you ever let off the upper part of your house ?
—Never.
Are you the landlord of any house in Duke'--
court, Drury-lane?—No.
Not of No. 9 or No. 12 ?—No.
Do you know No. 9 or No. 12, Duke's-court,
Drury-lane ?—I do.

Rave you anything to do with either of them ?
Nothing.

Do you know whether either of these houses is at
present to let ?-4 do not.
Upon your oath, sir, is not one of those houqPi at
present to let, with a reference to yourself ?-IJdon
my oath it is not, with either my knowledge or my
sanction.

Nor was so yesterday?—Nor was so yesterday.
Did you ever live in George-street, St. Giles 's ?
Never.

Did you ever keep a house there ?—Never.
Upon your oath did you no keep a brothel in
George-street, St. Giles'e?—Upon my oath 1 did not.
Never ?—Never.

Hail you ever any interest in a brothel in George-
stref,, Sr.

Was tne upper part of your house in Jermyn-street
ever let for gambling purposes ?—Since I have taken
it, three years ago, no one has ever occupied it but
myself and family.
Was it ever wed for gambling purposes ?—Never
since I have been in it.

Ras the upper pia ever been entered by the police ?
—Toe policr w4ik up when they come in of a nigh
to t..ee who may be there.
„
nave not the poiic, pointed out to you women as
reputed p ostitutes ?—I don't recollect their ever
doing so; if they had I bhould have put the parties out.
Win you swear h th,-y have not repehtedly done
so ?—I do swear that th.y have not repeatedly done so.
Win you sweAr that they 114 v.. never done so?—ln
tore,- ye .rs I can't recollect, but I never recollect such
a circumstance.

Will you bwe4rthat they hive never taken gamblers
out of those ro.)tn.?—l will swear that no man ha°
ever h'en taken in custody there, unless it has been at
my charge.

ti,ve y ou ever charged any person with gambling ?
—No.

Don't you soil the jewellery you have been speak-
ing of to the wen who fn-quent your house, to give
to the women who fri-queut your house don
know. I sell it to the wen wbo fri-quent my house,
and what they do with it I don't know. I have
fn-qaently seen them wear watches and rings I hate
sold them.

DO you know the prisoner Broome P—l do.
Is he not an intimate acquatntance of yours?••••
Nut particularly. I know the man.
Does he ever tr,quent your house ?—He comes in
sometimes, not very often.
By night ?—Yes.

Alone or in company don't know. Sometimes
be may come in in company with some one, but his
visit's are so seldom I can't say.
R.-examined by Mr, Genese, You
have been adted several questions. Now, are you
upon your with worth several thousands of pounds
I am.

Mr. Lewis was then about to address the Court in
support of the bail he had tendered, when
Mr. Sill objected to his right to do so, and after
some discussion,
Tne Chairman decided against Mr. Lewis bele);
heard, as being contrary to practice.
Mr. Lewis submitted that the respectability of the
witness, relative to which some questions bad been
put, had nothing to do with the point at issue—lns
sufficiency as bail.
The Chairman considered it was most important the
respectability of the bail should be inquired into, so
that they might have a certainty of the prisoner being
fort booming.
Mr. Lewis contended it was enough that the wit-
ness proved he was of sufficient substance. Suppose,
for instance, he lodged 1001.
Mr. Borrer, one of the magistrates, said he would
by no means consider that to be sufficient. In the
present instance the party tendered as bail bad been
described as being a jeweller, and it turned out that
he kept a coffee and chop house. In his (Mr. Bore
rer's) opinion the bail ought not to be accepted.
Tne Chairman said he quite concurred in that qv
mon, and the bail must, 'herefore, be refused.
Some conversation having taken place between the
solicitors as to the notice to be given relative to the
parties to be prop ,sed as bail,
Mr. Sill intimaTed that under the circumstances
he would not, at present go into another case against
one or the prisoners, which he was prepared to bring
forward.

Mr. Levds complained of the adoption of that
cour,e.

Mr. Sill considered he was exercising a sound
discretion.
flue inquiry then terminated.
liispector Ocway was present, by order of the
Commissioner* of Police to watch the proceedings.

THE CoUNT

the following is the official
corn, &c., received in the poi
Essex, from the 11th Aug.,
both inclusive:—

Colchester
Harwich
Leigh
Mahlon

t Y 'MARKETS.
statement of the quantities . a
•t, of London from the ports 10
1851, to the 16th Ang., 1651'

103 •
'S
25
23 -
- 101

53

CHELMSFORD, Aua. 15.—Prices to-day were as follow:7;
Wheat, white, old 416 to 46s ; new —s to --s; red, OW
356 to 406; new, —s to —s ; barley, —s to —s ; chevalier
—s to —a ; grinding 20s to 26s ; oats 18s to 25s ; malt 01
to 55s ; chevalier 54s to 56s ; peas, partridge, new 27s to
3thi; old, —s to —s ; white, new, 27s to 296; old, —s to --.5;
dun, new, 25s to 26s ; beans, tick, new 2tis to 29$ ; old, 005
to Uos ; harrow ticks, new 279 to 30s; old —8 to —s;
ma-
zagan, new 26. to 28s; old —s to —s per qr.
COLCH icsnea, Aua. 16.—Wheat, white 424 to 46s ; red 381
to 406 ; oats, 20, to 235; beans, mazagan 2dl to .ss; middle
and small 28. to 30s; peas, white 268 to 28s, grey, new 245 to
26s per qr.
PERTH, Aua 15.—Wheat, old, 388 Od to 42s Od; ditto,
new, 00s to OJs ; barley, new, 228 Od to 25s Od; oats, Ifis
22d; peas and beans, 26s Oct to 30s per quarter. Oats:Dello
per sack, 34a to Ns.

Szawicii, Aua. 14.—Wheat, 40s Od; barley, 00s Od
oats, 00s Od ; rye, 00a Od ; beans, 00s Od ; peas, COs Od
average per imperial quarter.
STraramo, Aug. 15.—Wheat, foreign, 21s to 235; ditt°_,l,
home, 003 Od; ditto ditto new, 193 Id to 21, 3d; barley, FT
boll of 6 bushels, 185 to 19s Od ; ditto new, 15, 6d to 184 •
Oats, Cupar, 003 Od to 003; ditto new, 155 6d to 17s 01;
ditto, Flemish, Os Od to 03 Od ; ditto ditto new, 00s Od; 011
distillers, 338 Od to 35s ; ditto brewers, 35s Od to 371; bear
3'
re
per boll, 00s Od to 003 Od; ditto new, 16s 6d to 1850 d; pease 0
Od to ous Od; flour, new per sack, 33, to 34s Od; ditto cornolG4,
ditto, 19s Od to 218 Od; oatmeal, per load, 00s Od to Otis 04;
ditto new 34s Od to 3ds Od; ditto per peck of 71bs, lAA to Ild;
fresh butter, per lb, 9d to 10d ; eggs, per dozen, 7d to SCI
hay, old, per ton, 84s to OUs Od; ditto, new, 60, to 70s. „,
KELSO, AUG. 15. Wheat, old, 003 to 003; ditto, new,
to 34s Od ; barley, new, 2us Od to 213 6d y • ditto old, Os to Os;
potato oats, 00s to 003 ; ditto new, 17s 6d to 1930 d ; comnr,ll
oats oils Od to 00s Od ; ditto new, 163 to las 6d ; peas, 005
to (Os Od ; beans, 60s to 09st,c1 per boll of six imperial bushels.
HAWICIC, Alio. 14. new, 333 to 35s 6d; barley'
new, 2 fa to zla tid ; ditto old, 00s Od to 003 Od ; potato oa"'„,
17s to 18s 6d ; common oats, 16s Od to 18s Od ; peas, 223 vu
to 24s Od; beans, 23s Od to 243 Od per boll of six imperial
bushels.

KIN.KALD7, Ana. 16.—The following are the quotation,
for grain :
Wheat. Barley. Oats. Beans.
First 478 6.1 28s ud 26s Od —a Od
,econd 44s lid gds Od 25a Od Od
Third 4os 6,1 24s 6d 22s Od —s Od
Oatmeal, oer t,a it 28011., imperial, 33s Od to
HADDINGTON, AUG. 15.—The following are the
grain at our market to-day :

Peas,,,i•
--s Od
—6
153, Od. f
Price 6 u

IA twat.

Barley.
.. ' Data. 1:3"11;j'a
First .. ... 46s Od i 326 0,1 1 276 Od 36a
,d
,
Second ... ... 416 5d 1 30s 5d 24s 11d 346 la,c,iv
Third ... .. 366 Od 30. Oil 121 a Od 331
Total quantity of Wheat in market 330 qrs., z7B 9014 i
Do. Barley do. 13 q, s., 6 130-
Do. Oat. do.
Do. Beans do. 13882
(1(11.7:: 17025 sold 6),
GLAsoow, At m. 13.—provisions—Cheese, 34s to 43s u••
per cwt ; retail, 5d to tid per lb. Skim milk, 2us Od to Os Per
cwt. Country tresh butter, 10d to us Od per lb. Irish pen
dered, in lumps, • i'd to 9d; country powdered, wholesale, °T
to Od. Country eggs, 93 per dozen ; carried hen ditto, 54 6d
per 120, or 7d per dozen. Hens, 2s Od per pair ; Dacis'
2s Od.

FALKIRK, AUG. 14. —The supply of grain in this the
market was 72 bolls, wheat at tvs 6d to 22s dd per bull
barley, 00s Od to Us Od ; oats, 16s 9d to 178 9d; beans, I$J 0"
to 193 Ud per boll ; oatmeal, Os to 03 per load.

COAL MAE& E
Carr's Hartley ..... Od
Redhugn Main ..... Its
Canfield Nloor Butes 123 I'd
Walker's Primrose l2s 0
West. Wylam
VVylain
Wall'i End, Stc.
Acorn Close
Hilda l3s ocl
Riddell
Eden Main . l3. 9d
Braddyll
Haswell l4, 9V
Lsmbton .............
Russell's Hutton
Ships at market,

;T.— YESTIRDAT.
Scarborough l3s 61
deugh Hail
Ks:lloe.. ... • 14s 3;
...... ••
South Hartlepool 146 31
••..•
South Kelloe l3B 9'
thornley
A hitworth
(Adelaide fees
IWeit Cornforth
Cowpen Hartley
DerwentwaterHartley 148 o,'
Hartley ~......„ ... 143 0"
!Nixon '5 Merthyr and
Cardiff ....-•••• ..... 21s 01
Sidne) 'a Hartley
99 Sold, 72.

BIRTHS.
OF A SON.
Oa the 15th inst at Torrington.square, the wife of Edified
Willson Crosse, Eiq.
On the isch inst., at Spring Vale, Isle of Wight, the Wife
of Captain George Hathorn, R.N.
OF A DAUGHTER.
,i" of
On the 13th inst., at Huntspill, Sonaersetshire, the w—e
the Rev. George Jenkins.
On the 15th inst., at Curzon-street, Mayfair, the Led/
Catherine Wheble, of Bulmershe-court, Berks.

MARRIED. f
On the 14th inst., at Great Marlow, William, second eon - o
the Lite Richard Brown, Esq., of Bognor, to Cornelia Janel
oungest daughter of the late Thomas Tindal, Escl" °
Aylesbury.
un the 14th inst., at St. James's Church, Westbonrne:
terrace, Lieutenant George Augustus Brice, R.N , second
son of James Brine, Esq., of Grosvenor-place, Bath, 0 11'
Nanette, daughter of Charles Purton Cooper, Esq., 42.,d't -
Grove-end- road.

DIED.
On the 12th inst., at Margate, Par. T. T. Morrell, of Peck.
ham-rye, aged 63.
On the 4th inst., Bertha, wife of the Rev. G. B. 2,l°l°ll'
rector of Sandringham, Norfolk.
On the 14th inst., at A denham-wood, Herts, Charles -Si'
cholls, Esq.. aged 79.
On the 14th inst., at Phillimore-terrace. Kensington,
Rosalinda, relict of the late Christopher Foss, E3cl., of r°ll-
-n-street, aged 80.
0.1 the 15th inst., Thomas Lupton, Esq., of Grangevillas,
Brompton, aged 59. Wife
On the 15th inst., at Upper Clapton, Middlesex, Lucy,
of Henley Smith, Esq. eral
On the 16th inst., in Sloane-street, Lieutenant•%Jan
Nathaniel Forbes, H.E.I C.S.

London: Printed and Published by il1URI.)0 TO
r'.o
No. 112, StP The Svn OfE
Strand, in thQ Prpcinctrinter
at
of the Savoy, in tticrs,
" oull' of
Middlasex, Tuesday, August 19, 1851.