The Sun.
London, England, 1851-05-31 00:00:00

PAR,LIAMENTAR,Y DIVISIONS.

(From the YGtes and Proceedings of the Howe of Commons.)
FRIDAY, MAY 30.
ECCLESIASTICAL TITLES ASSUMPTION BILL.
(IN THE COMMITTEE.)
Question put," That Clause one stand part of the Bill."
The Committee divided:—
MAJORITY—AYES, 244.

MINORITY—NOES, 62.
Greene, John Oswald, Alexander
Higgins, Geofge Peel, Frederick •
Ilobhouse, T. B. Ponsonby, C. F.
Keating, Robert Power, Dr.
Lawless, Cecil Pusey, Philip
M'Cullagh, W. T. Roche, E. B.
Megan, W . H. Sadleir, John
Maher, N. Scholetield, William •
Meagher, Thomas Scully,Francis
Mahon, O'Gorman Seymour, H. D.
Monsen, William Smith, R. V.
Moore, G. H. Smythe, George
Murphy, F. S. Somers, J. P.
Norreys, Sir D. Suillian, Michael
Nugent, Sir Percy Talbot, J. H.
O'Brien, John Tenison, E. K.
O'Brien, Sir T. Tennent, . . J.
O'Connell, John Wegg-Prosser, F.
O'Connell, M. J.
O'Ferrall, More
O'l'laherty, Anthony ReynolT,LJEoßnSli
Osborne, Ralph Keogh, William

Armstrong, R. B.
Arandel;;Earl of
Barron, Sir H.
Blake, Martin J.
Bright, John

Burke, Sir T. J.
Clements, Charles
Colebrooks, Sir T.
Corbally, M. E.
Crawford, W. S.
Currie, Henry
Dawson, T. V.
Devereux, J. T.
Fagan, James
W. Fox,
J .

French, F.
Geach, Charles
Gladstone, W. E.
Goold, Wyndham
Grace, 0. D. J.
Graham, Sir J.
Grattan, Henry

COLONIAL PROPERTY QUALIFICATION BILL.
Order for Second Reading read; MotiOn made, and Quei-
tion proposed, " That the Bill be now read a second time :"
Amendment proposed, to leave out the word " now," and
at the end of the Question to add the words " upon this day
six months." Question put, " That the word now' stand
part of the question." The House divided
MAJORITY—AYES,-72. '
Prewen, C. H. Nugent, Sir Percy
Geach, Charles Paget, Lord A.
Goold, Wyndham Paget, Lord C.
Grenfell, C. Pascoe Patten, J. W.
Grey, Sir George Filkington, James
nestle, Alexander Rich, Henry
Hawes, B. Russell ,F. C. H.
Hayter, W. G. Seymer, H. K.
Hill, Lord Marcus Smollett, A.
Hindley, Charles Somerville, Sir W.
Hollond, Robert Spearman, H. J.
Howard, E. G. Spooner, R.
Kershaw, James Sullivan Michael
King, P. J. Talbot, C. It.
Lewis, Sir T. Thompson, Colonel
Lockhart, W. Verner, Sir W.
Loveden, Pryse Wakley, Thomas
Miles, Philip W. S. Wawn, J. T.
Moncreiff, James Westhead, J. B.
Morris, David Williams, W.
Mostyn, E. M. L. Wilson, James
Mulgrave, Earl of Wood, Sir W. P.
Mullings, J. R. TfILERS.
Nicholl, J. Hutt, William
Norreys, Sir D. Aglionby, H. A.

4bdy, Sir T. N.
Adderley, C. B.
Anson, Colonel
Ansley, T. C.
Baines, M. T.

Bass, lcf. T.
Bennet, Philip
Berkeley. C. L. G.
Blair, Stephen

BriscO,.l,l-.

Cavendish, W. a
Christy, Samuel
Clive, H. B.
Cockburn, SirA.
Codrington, Sir W.
Cowper, W. F.
Douglas, Sir C.
Duncuft, John
Dundas, Admiral
Dundas, Sir David
Dunne, Colonel
Ellice, Edward
Ferguson, Sir B.
Foley, J. H.
Freshileld, J. W.

111(INORITY-NOES, 21.
Arkwright, Georg Greene, Thomas Stuart, H.
Baldwin, C. B. Hall, Colonel Taylor, Thomas E.
Bateson, T. Henley, J. W. Tyler, Sir G.
Blackstone, W. S. Hill, Lord E. Waddington, H. S.
Boldero, George H. Lowther, Colonel Willoughby, Sir H.
Duncan, George Blasterman, J. TELIMS.
Ferrer, James Scholefield, William Stanford, J. F.
Galway, Viscount Seaham, Viscount Forester, G. C.

THE RECEIPT GOLD DUST ROBBERY.
The official investigation by the authorities of the South-
Western Railway
Companyinto the circumstances of the
mysterious gold-du.st robbery was proceeded with on Wed-
nesday and Thurslay last, at the offices of the company, in'
the York-road, and was continued until a late hour each
evening, in the presence of several members of the board of
directors. On Thursday a portion of the guards, engine-
drivers, and breaks men were summoned to attend, together
with all the servanlts employed at the stations on the line at
which the train stopped on the night in question. One of
the attendants at a station was upwards of four hours under
examination ; this was followed by taking the evidence of
Morgan, the breaksznan to the train, which terminated the
proceedings of the day. Several other persons are still to
be examined, and it is believed that the inquiry will extend
over two or three days more, as it is the intention of the
company to bring forward all the parties in any way con-
cerned, and to sift the matter as far as it is possible for them
to do so.

Inspector Field and Sergeant Shaw, of the metropolitan
detective police, and the City detective officers, Trent and
Huggett, have been busily employed since the last examina-
tion at Winchester in collecting evidence, and the latter
officers have made such inquiries at the different stations on
the London and South-Eastern Railway as there is reason to
believe will enable them to fix positively on the person who
travelled by the seven o'clock train to Dover, on the Friday
morning after the robbery, and with whom, it is believed,
the prisoner Plampin was seen in conversation at the Lon-
don-bridge terminus, shortly after he left the coffee-house at
the Eastern Counties Railway. It may be generally stated,
that as far as the inquiry has gone, nothing has transpired
to fix the slightest suspicion upon any servant in the employ
of the respective companies, and how the boxes were ab-
stracted remains, up to the present moment, as much a mys-
tery as ever.

COMMITTAL OF THE PRISONER PLAMPIN.
WINCHESTER, FRIDAY EVENING.—This day William
Plampin, who stands charged with being concerned in
the gold dust robbery on the South-Western Railway,
was again brought up.
Mr. Crombie, who appeared for the prosecution, on
the part of the South-Western Railway Company, said,
that in consequence of aie suggestion thrown out by-the
Worshipful Chairman on the occasion of the last exami-
nation of the prisoner, he intended to close his case this
day, and upon that to ask for the committal of the pri-
soner on the charge of stealing the gold dust in ques-
tion. As he had stated last week, inquiries had been
going on between the South-We,tern Railway and the
Royal Mail Steam-packet Companies, for the purpose of
connecting the prisoner with other parties, but of which
they were not prepared to offer the proof that day.
There could be no doubt, however, that a robbery bad
been committed, and to the connexion of the prisoner
with it he was prepared with proof that day.

After the evidenCe had beer: given,
The Mayor said that the Bench were not unanimous,
but there was a great majority in favour of sending the
prisoner for trial, and ho must say that he was one of
that number. From the evidence that had been adduced,
he thought that an opportunity should be given of in-
vestigating it in another court. The prisoner would,
therefore, be committed to the next Winchester sessions.
The prisoner was then formally committed, but will
be brought up again on Friday next fur the depositions
to be finally completed.