The Sun.
London, England, 1847-01-13 00:00:00

WHITECHAPEX.
We had only a moderate supply of Meat on ofTer to-day.
"a the whole the trade was firm, at full prices. Beef, from
2510 d to 3s 8d; Mutton, 3s Sd to 4s 8d; Veal, 4s to 4s 10d;
and Pork, 4s to 4s 10d per 81b, by the carcase.

SPORTING INTELLIGENCE.
BETTING AT MANCHESTER—TUESDAY.
CHESTER CUP.
50 to 1 on the field—offered.
DERBY.
15 to 2 agst Van Tromp—offd 35 to 1 agst Wanota
1.3 to 1 agst Epirote —offered 35 to 1 agst Allertonian
to 1 agat Planet—offered 1000 to 15 agat West India
z 5 to 1 ant Glentilt Planter
2837 to 1 agst sis to Cobweb colt 1000 to 15 agst colt out of
n," O
to 1 agst Port—offered Calypso's darn.
to 1 agst Ludale

El*7'tirty 'lElution

CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)
The Lord Chancellor in his Court at Westminster
todayB and heard cause petitions, none of which pos-
sessed any points of interest except to the parties con-
cerned.

ROLLS' COURT.-(THIS DAY.)
FISHER AND CROFTS V. ATKINSON AND OTHERS.
The arguments in this case were resumed to-day, but
not concluded at the rising of the Court.

VICE-CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)
THE
(Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND.)
RE ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH COMPANY V. GAMBLE AND
NOTT.
'llle arguments on this motion for an injunction on
behalf of the plaintiffs, the Electric Telegraph Company,
were resumed and concluded to .day.
„ notioun, without calling upon the counsel for
the defendant stated that, in his opinion, the best course
10 be adopted, would be to direct the motion to stand
oyer, in order that the validity of the patent might be
determined at law. This suggestion met with the ap-
probation of all parties, and the case rests at present.
nis .13oNourt then proceeded to hear motion?, and
stated that it was his intention to proceed with the hear-
ing of them to-morrow.

(Before Vice-Chancellor Sir J. WicßAm.)
E.WART AND OTHERS V. RENSIT AND OTHERS.-
JUDGMENT.
iEf ill rforroun gave judgment in this case to-day, grant-
on Mong the inda ju
y. action. The facts appeared in this journal
szermiE
AND OTHERS V. BLAKE AND OTHERS.--

JUDGMENT.
I}li3 HONOUR also gave judgment in this case. The
Plaintiffs were the younger children of Dr. Starkie, de-
ceased, and the defendants were purchasers of the estate ~
John Edward Starkie, the eldest son of Dr. Starkie.
The object of the suit was to rectify a deed which had
been executed on the 23d of December, 1830, between
J(410 Edward Starkie and Dr. Starkie, by inserting the
~
-"le Of Maria Barbara Starkie, the mother of the
Plaintiffs, in the body of the document. The terms of
111 e deed were to the effect, that John Edward Starkie
should pay Dr. Starkie during his lifetime 1,200/. per
annum, and a sum of 6,5001., as well as other demands,
.! consideration of which he resigned to him (John
Edward Starkie) his interest in certain copyhold pro-
,PertY. It appeared that the estate at this time was sub-
Oct to a debt of 92,0001., and another of 8,000/., &c.,
Edward
John Edward Starkie was obliged to pay. John
fadward Starkie also covenanted to pay two annuities,
one of 7501. and another of 2001. ' • and there were several
other liabilities to which John Edward Starkie bound
himself by the deed in question.
Ilis HONOUR was clearly of opinion that the only mode
iu which any relief could be granted was by a declaration
to the effect asked.

LETTS V. THE BLACEWALL RAILWAY COMPANY.
The arguments in this cause were resumed and con-
cluded to day.
. Judgment was deferred.

UEEN'S BENCH.-(THIS DAY.)