The Sun.
London, England, 1823-01-18 00:00:00

[monNlNo pos.r.]

we received last niaht Bayonne Papers to the
WO) inst. They represent the situation of the
Army of the Faith in Navarre as most deplorable.
O'Diitinel had been compelled to leave it by the
clamours of 'oldkrs, or rather the intrigues
of the other Chiefs, ivho had not been pleased at
beitig compelled to resign the command into hiS
habds, though they dared uot at the time disobey
the ordpis of the Urgel Regency. But since the

11igh►t and dissolitticti of that ephemeral body,
they had used all possible means to make him
lose the respect and confidence of the troops.
They painted him as too old for the warfare
in which he was engaged (though the chief
ground of complaint against him seems to

tave been the fatiguing rapidity of his
marches), and they availed themselves of his
close relationship to the Conde d'Abisbal to ex-
cite serious doubts of fii,s fidelity. Having re-

fused to give battle to the Constitutionalists, be-
couse he felt that the only way to preserve his
army was to avoid a general action, a sedition
broke Out in his own camp, and he retired to St.
Jpan-pied-dp-Port, where he remained on the
10th instant, a with his feet frozen, and the ma-

ledictino of his soldiers for his recompence."—
Meanwhile Torrijos, who had occupied all the
strong positions In Navarre, and driven the
itoyaliqs into the vines, issued a Proclamation,
whicit induced many, of the latter to abandon
their colours and to join his army. O'Donnel's

successor had not bet,n appointed, but it was re-
ported that General Quesada, celebrated for his
defeatfi, was expected from Paris to take the
supremo command, which was divided for the
time between the two Guerilla Leaders, Juan..
nito and Ludron. The intelligence frOm Madrid
does not come down later, than the 2(1 inst. All
was then tranquil in the Spanish capital. In
consequence of the refusal of the Pope to sanc-
tion the division of the dioceses and the exile of
the Archbishops who had proved hostile to the
present system, a :proposal was to be Made in
the Cartes to render the Spanish Church inde-
pendent of Rome.

1:1.40 TIMER.]
No expresses hating arrived in town yester-
tiny, up to the hour it which the business of the
Agchange terminates, inventien was exceedingly
active In supplying the want of real intelligence.
The most formidable rumour current was one of
the assassituttiou„of Count de Legarde;the French
Ambassador a(Madrid ; but this was DO sooner
bruited than discredited. Another story, of in
suits having been offered to that Minister by the
populace of the Sanish copital 'MIS SO circtm-
stantially related, as' to induce itiquiries into
its authenticity, .'wh:en was ascertained that.
a letter; had arrived from Par.is, bUt dated
as long 1146. as Monday, last, nientioning such,
an event, and 'giving :particultirsi, The date
assigned was the 17th instant, and the lette'r:
StateS„ that on
.t,hat day a tumultuous assemblage
took place before the ,house of M. do Lakarde tit
Madrid, who used ekpresslons highly menacing
and inieltitig, and exhibited every demonstration
Of the iutention to rooted to violence—that M.de.
Lagard- dispatched '4 inesenger to the Command.
ant, apprising: 114 n f his danger, who promptly
enforced tln attendance of the military, and
by their.aid lie Was enabled to escape by a baCk'
Ivay, whooce he: was conveyed for security to a
distance of -miles froth the capital. The writer
gives some colou! to
,this statement, and accounts
for truting so important en event to the post, by
adding that it •was,knewn only (besides himself)
to the !Aerial G.ov,ernmentrwho would not suffer
it for two or three days to transpire in Paris,
and that all the
.eXpresSes from Madrid had
been stopped. 'rho whole story is a contempt-
Me falsehood. We allude to it only as a ettri.
ens specimen of the expedients resorted to in or.
dot' to depress the foreign securitieg. We un-
doro.and soiree large sales of Spanish stock were

rrttle On the strength of this rumour, which oh.
however, so little belief, that the prices
rocovertd nln ht innueditely. Our expieSS;the
contents of %vhich Tiublished in Wednesday's
paper, left /Madrid on the 7th, the date of the
pretended riot, and all' was then perfectly tran.

quit.

U:N' ENV TIMES.
`i lu is Benin ]
of the political campaign in the
Schee is usuaily preceded by some skirmishing
without doors, and so it happens at present. On
the Atinisterial side a battery has been erected in
the shape of a Pamphlet, which has it walked

the townaWhilenurrib'ring good intellects."—On
the other hand, the guerillas of the malcontent
party assemble, to. shew off their dexterity -in
speechification, and to condense their argu-
ments into strong resolutions and patriotic
healths 44 five fathom deep." Notwithstand-
ing the late unfortunate explosion at Nor-
wich, the Whig's have determined on hold-
ing a grand field-day at Edinburgh, and two
happy occurrences coincided to afford them a
happy opportunity, the anniversary of Mr. Fox's
birth, and the election of Sir James Mackintosh
to succeed Mr. Jeffrey as Lord Rector. of Glas-
gow. We.say it with unaffected sincerity, we
are truly pleased that Sir James should have ob-
tained so appropriate an honour as that which
leas been:bestowed on him by the young Gentle-
men of the Lanarkshire University. But on cast-
ing our eye over the report which has reached us
of the Edinburgh dinner, we cannot but think that
Sir Jame and his friends have been a little too
much elevated by his accession of dignity. The
idea or having a Lord Rector among them seems
not a little to have 44 dazzled their eyes and be-
wildered their brains." The tone of their
speeches was as elevated and Bobadilish us if
they had not heard of the late unfortunate explo-
sion which made their friends cut so foolish a
figure at Norwich. It seems that the determina-
tion
.of the Edinburgh Reformers " to oppose
and expose," is us fierce as ever. Heaven have
mercy on the Sinking Fund and the Property of
the Church, if such political Drawcansirs do but
once more get into power !

[MORNING HERALD.]
We heard, in the City, yesterday evening, that
ad vices of a late date bad been received by Go-
vernment, from Madrid, and that the intelligence
brought is to this effect :—that the Spanish Go-
vernment would be guided by the advice of Eng-
land as to the question o( waror peace with France,
::.ad that the general opinion entertained in Madrid
was that there would be no war. We give this
rumour as we received it, not pledging ourselves
in the least for its authenticity. If we may
express any opinion on a subject so momen-
tous, especially to those interested in Foreign
Securities, it would be, that the Spaniards have
no idea of going to war with the French ; for in
so doing, they would risk every thing, and could
gain nothing ; and, on the other hand, we can
hardly imagine that the French Government
would be so stupid as to go to war with Spain,
by which, in all likelihood, they could get no-
thing but hard knocks, while they run the risk
of their troops, even if they conquered
Spain, returning to France with the same
revolutionary spirit the troops of that weak
Prince Louis the Sixteenth manifested, after he
was silly enough to send Lafayette and a French
army to the assistance of the rebellious North
American Colonies of Great Britain. It is, how-
ever, difficult to say how this affair will end,
and especially on the part of France. When
any Government has at its command one or two
hundred thousand well-appointed and well-paid
troops, it is apt to be equally affected as a man
in private life is who has at immediate command
one or two hundred thousand pounds. Man is
but weak at the best, either collectively as a Go-
vernment, or individually as in private life.--
When pride or passion gets upper hand in either,
it is not easy to foresee the result.

['mann rat:ss.]
The conduct of the High Sheriff of Wexford is,
so far as the official tools of Government are con-
cerned, a striking and just retribution for the in-
sidious hostility with which public meetings in
England have been restrained. The Acts of
Lord Castlereagh, in the very spirit of this hosti-
lity, are a reproach to legislation, and will hang
as a mill-stone from the_ neck of our Constitution
until they are abolished with due execration. It
was but the other day that the Noble brother of
the-insulted Lord Lieutenant called the meeting
of a county, not far inferior even to Wexford,
44,a farce." This is retributive justice ; but its
retributiveness is all that can be praised. It is,
generally speaking, the natural fruit of the mon-
strousignorance,arrogance,and persecution which
have been so long favouied and promoted by the
Tory Administration of this country. The reasons
of this rival of some applauded Sheriffs in England
for refusing a county meeting are not more singu-
lar than they are absurd and contemptible. With
such reasons we were familiar when county meet-
ings were refused on occason of the military outrage
at Manchester. Becauie a Party Grand Jury have
:ignored bills, to the astonishment of every man
who understands the province of a Grand Jury
and the 9bligations of an oath ; therefore public
meetings are not allowed to express their.
.abhor-
settee of assassination, violence, and outrage.—
The Sovereign of Carlow had set •the example
of
,this sagacious magnanimity, worthy of the as-
sembled sovereigns of circular celebrity. We
should as soon reason with the '‘ lunatic" who
talks of an ‘‘ atrocious violation of French terri-
tory," as with the Sovereign of Carlow or the
High Sheriff of 'Wexford. They are d • hi
a mire y
illustrating the cause they espouse, and effectu-
ally promoting the • principles which they hate
and persecute.

SAVAGE ACT.-----.--O,1Ifithly night some
wretches poisoned a most valuable Newfound..
land dog, belonging to Mr. PumpoT, pawn-
broker, Bermondsey-street. The animal, when
discovered by its master, was foaming at the
mouth, and writhing to and fro in the extremity
of agony, and died in about an hour after.—This
is the second faithful animal lost by Mr. PIMPOT
through the same diabolical means within the
last two months. They were kept for the safety
of his premises, and on the former occasion the
shutters of his shop Were taken down, the gas-
lamp directly over his door being fiat extinguish-
ed, by cutting away the pipe, and several articles
of value in jewellery and plate carried off through
a cut pane of glass. Mr. PIIILPOT has had the
dogs opened, and large portions of arsenic were
found In the stomach of each. The savage act
is perpetrated by throwing the poison, thickly
covered with grease, within the reach of the
animal, which is swallowed without resting on
the palate.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, JAN. 17.
IN RE THOMAS SPURRYER, A LUNATIC.

Mr. HEALD moved that the Committee of the lunatic might
bring an action of' ejectment against the person in poasesion of
an estate to which the lunatic was supposed to be entitled. The
former application to the Court bad been made sit the instance
of the Committee, who, at his own expence, and from motives
of humanity, had prosecuted the interests of this unfortunate
lunatic, who was a pauper. He had been non compos mentis
for more than thirty years, during which period a sniall estate
of inheritance had demised to him from his father. A party,
taking advantage of his condition, had procured a conveyance
of the property, and obtained possession, and the lunatic had
been ever since in a state of the utmost wretchedness. Refer-
ence had been made to the Master, who reported that the con-
veyance was not sufficient, and that the lunatic could recover,
and recommended a bill to be filed for that purpose. The
Committece had been advised by a common lawyer to try the
force of an ejectment against the present holder, which was a
mode of proceeding so much more simple and cheap, that the
Committee determined to adopt it, provided his Lordship would
grant the order.
The LORD CHANCELLOR, without fuller information, could
not make such an order. The Maiter had reported that a bill
would give the lunatic his remedy. It must be shewn why an
ejecunent was preferable, to justify hisoLordship in rejecting
the opinion of the Master, for which he had called.
Mr. HEALD said it would cause the loss of twelve months by
the delay.
The LORI) CHANCELLOR said that was not quite so clear.
By following the Master's directions, they would have a more
sure and very likely a speedier remedy than in any other way.
The'deed spoken of might be so framed as to defeat a common
action, and yet this Court,
,regarding the circumstances under
which it was obtained, would be able to relieve the lunatic
from the operation of it. If they could convince him that an
action of ejectment was the More eligible, he would hear them
again.
Mr. HEALD admitted that the Mamer adhered to his first
report, and therefore it would be better to proceed with a bill,
as a nonsuit in common law might prejudice the after hearing
in equity.
The LORD CHANCELLOR did not assent to that. They
might try the experiment at law, and afterwards be as they were
before, in Chancery.

CHAMBERS V. SIR ANTHONY LECHMERE AND BENJAMIN

JOHNSON, LOCI. •
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said, that in this case the bill
in support of which he was to address his Lordship prayed for
the removal of the trustees for the appointment of a receiver,
and, further, for the payment of such a sum of money into
Court as they had not accounted for. The Learned Attorney-
General described the conduct of these trustees as negligent in
the extreme and justly meriting the censure of his Lordship.—
Indeed a case of more culpable inattention to those interests
to' which they were bound to attend had seldom appeared m
II- Court of Justice. That negligence too was not denied.; they
admitted their gross misconduct, and though he did not attri-
bute either fraud or wilful default to the Gentlemen whose con-
duct he was investigatlng, still he felt that the same conse-
quences which fraud or dishonesty usually originated, prevailed
in this case to an alarming, and, indeed, a calamitous extent.—
The testator in this case died in the year 1809, and by his will
directed that the trustees under itshould dispose of his property,
real and personal, with all convenient 'speed—to pay his debts
with as little delay as possible—and to discharge all his legacies
within twelVe months after his death. In 1809, as be had
just stated, the testator died; and the trustees by their answer
admitted that, bad the pioperty been then Sold, there would
have been ample means both for the discharge of the debts due
by the testator, and also for the payment of his various legacies.
But the *teem was now reversed, and in 1823 they were apply.
ing for the payment of these legacies, with the unpleasant re-
flection of knowing, from the information of these trustees,that
there were not means• left even for the payment of the,testa-
tor's debts. Upon this one circuinsts'nce alone, he submitted
that their negligence was apparent ; but it was not upon ap-
pearances alone that he relied, since they had the evidence of
the trustees themselves to shew, that if not delinquency at least
most singular negliffence was attributable to them. Upon that
material fact then they had the admission of the trustees them-
selves. They indeed attempted to trace thatdeficiency to causes
which, while they urged them in palliation of their negligence,
served but to place diet negligence in a dearer light, and to ex-
pose more fully the extent or their inattention. They referred
that deficiency to the multiplication of vexatious suits insti-
tuted against them ; but was it not obvious to all, that the very
institution of such suits grew out of their own culpable negli-
gence. As soon as these Gentlemen succeeded to the trusts
which the will of the testator assigned to theme they permitted
the eldest son to occupy a considerable portion of the estate,
called the Whitbourne Estate, of the annual value of 5001. ;
and they also allowed him to receive the rents of other parts of
the estate, and to reside there for, the space of ten years, without
the payment of a single farthing of rent. During all that period
they never attempted to sell that estate, be; actually borrowed
money in order to procure a renewal of the lease. They ad-
mitted too that they allowed 28 different suits, exclusive of the
present, to be instituted Against them, the CMS of which amounted to upwards of 4,0001. They had put in long sche-
dules, though those very schedules had been reported by the
Master as insufficient. There was the sum of 1,5001. unac-
counted for, even by those very schedules ; and it appeared
that there Were several thousand pounds deficient in the rent
according to their own statements. They borrowed money
for the singular purposes of liquidating debts, which debts
carried no interest; and, instead of selling the mansion-house,
they raised money in order that the edifice, which they stated
to have been in a very dilapidated condition, should appear in
Its original splendour. This was not the way in which trustees
should manage an estate, and be apprehended that the Court
would visit upon them the consequences of their negligence.
The Lord Csiaerer:eton thought 'that this motion was not
tenable in its present form • because, if the facts imputed to the
trustees by the Attorney-deneral's statement were admitted, it
would be better that they were made matter of a bill and an-
swer, rather than thus to engraft them upon former proceedings.
111 r. PERES, on the mane side in consequence of the opinion
intimated by his Lordship, applied his observations merely to
the propriety of appointing a receiver.
Mr. HART, for the trustees, made several objections to the
font* of the motion, in the force of which his Lordship con-
cured.
Mr. SHADWELL vindicated the character of the assignees
from the imputations made upon it by the Attorney-General.
There was not thu least reason for supposing that any tumor
the property had been applied to their own use ; and had it not
been for the institution of vexations suits, the property would
be still capable of defraying the debts and legacies of the tes-
tator.

The LORD CHANCELLOR inquired if the trumes had any
objection to suite by affidavit the auras of money in their
hands ?

Mr.SIIADWELL replied, that these was not the Lmst objec.
tion to accede to such an arrangement. It had been statod by
the Attorney.:General, that the trustees were desired to dispose
of the property with all convenient speed; and they were quite,
willing to have done so, provided a reasonable ofia was made
for the property. They stated, however, that no such offer
had been made; and with respect to The permission granted to
'the elder Mr Chambers to reside upon the estate, it was no
very extraordinary privilege. The house was at the time that
he took possession of it in a state of dilapidation, and it had
been imprwied it 'his' expence. They stated also, , that they
could not procure a tenant for the mansion, and it must have
remained unoccupied, had they not permitted the SOU of its
late owner 'to occupy'
The Loan Crratscaton thought that a receiver ought to
be appointed, 'and that the trustees should ula/ca an affidavit
of the sums of money at present in their hands.

VICE-CIL#.Is7CELLOR'S COURT, JAN. 17.
GLASSINGTON' V. Tfit'AitES.
Mr. Bait called the attention of his' Honour to this case,
which had been decided in, ltis absence, lie thought that he
could show to the Court that the plaintiff was entitled to an
order much more extended than had beau granted.
The VICE-tIiANCELLOU requested the Learned Counsel to
mention the case again on Monday,

OLAI)WIN V. BON NOR.

---- •
On a former seal, an niunut on h►d been obtained by Mr.
Heald to restrain proceedings in an action of
.ejectinent.—
Mr. BELL now moved to dissolve that injunction. The
short facts of the case were these:--A Uentlenian of the name
of I3onnor became possessed of an estate in Northumber-
land, left in his father's will tinder the condition that he
should not go to America. Mr. Bonner married an American
lady took possession of the estate, and' burdened it with a
number of very heavy annuities. He afterwards got into
ciildes, and ishot at an officer. To avoid the consl
'2rituneencetri Bitoef
this act he was compelled to go to America In tle an
the annuitants got possession of the estate in Northumberland.
The sisters of Mr. Bormor, ladies residing in NOrthumberland
conceiving that be had thus forfeited his title to the estate,
brought an action of ejectmentitgairist the annuitants. It Was
to restmin proceeding In this action, that the injunction had
been obtained.
firat.n,.on theArt,of tthe annuitants, argued in sup.
port of the injunction—first, that the will only contenipiated
dm residence of Mr. Bonnor,with his family in America ; and

second, that It was an act of collusion between the parties, to
deprive the annuitant' of their rights.
The VICZ-CHANCZLLOR, after having fully beard the case,
directed the injunction to be continued, in order that if the
parties chose, an action might be raised to try the question of
eollusidn.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JAN. 17.
HARRY AND ANOTHER v. PRATT.
This was an action upon a policy of insurance on the ship
William and Mary, at and from Monte Video and Valaparaiso
to Europe, on ship and freight. The loss was averred to be by
perils of,the sea. .
Mr. SCARLETT stated, that in the Roads of Valparaiso the
ship experienced a tremendous gale of wind, but it did not ap-
pear at that time that it had caused any injury to the Fhip. It
was, however, discovered in the progress of the voyage that
. the gale of wind was the incipient cause of the mischief which
afterwards ensued. Having proceeded some distance on the
voyage, she sprang a leak, which obliged the Captain to return
to the harbour of Okimboe ; it was then found the vessel had
broken her keelson. There being no docks in that harbour, it
was found impossible to repair the ship. The cargo, which
consisted principally of copper, was transferred to another ship,
and the wreck sold.

Several witnessea were called, who proved that previous to
the voyage in question the William and Maly was a strong
well-built Pomeranian ship, and calculated from the manner
of her Construction to carry a cargo much exceeding her regu-
lar tonnage.
A witness was called to speak to the sea-worthiness of the
vessel, who stated, in answer to a question as to his nautical
experience, that he had beep , fifty-seren voyages to the West
Indies, and had crossed the Atlantic one hundred and twenty-
six times.

Mr.IIIAnRYATT, for the defendant, insisted that the acci-
dent hnd been occasioned by the overloading of the vessel.
The deposition of a person who surveyed the vessel a,
Okimboe, wax read in confirmation of the -Learned Counsel's
statement.

Mr. SCARLETT replied.
The LOUD Curler JUSTICE told the Jury that the question
was, whether, when the ship sailed from Monte Video for Val-
paraiso and Okimboe to bring the cargo for Europe, she was
capable of performing the voyage ? Ile observed that copper
was a lading tending very much to try the strength of the vessel.
The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff-4001

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, J. 17.
WALLIS V. WILLIAMS.
This was an action to recover damages from the defendant for
having maliciously arrested and held the plaintiff to bail.
Mr. Serjeant Lrxs stated the case to the jury, which was in
effect that the plaintiff, who was an engraver and printer, had
been induceal to accept three several bills of exchange for the
accommodation of the defendant, who was a farmer. The de.
fbndant bail given the plaintiff a guarantee to provide for the
bills.when they became due in regular course. The bills were
drawn in 1818, and when due the defendant paid them. A con.
siderable time after this, in 1821, the defendant arrested the
plaintiff for the amount of the bills, and detained him in prison
fbr several weeks; after which he liberated him without taking
further proceedings. For this arrest the present action was
brought, a demand for compensation having been refused.
A number of witnesses were called, who proved the fact of
the acceptance of the bills by the plaintiff, which they observed
was by agreement between plaintiff and defendant, the former
not haying had any value for them.
Mr. Sergeant 'WORM? said he was instructed to give a
different account of the transaction ; that thiplaintiff and de-
fendant were duped by the artifices of a person earned Eding.
ton, for whom the bills were accepted ; and that the defendant
had paid them himself, the plaintiff not beinrin a condition
to do so.

The Learned Serjeant called several witnesses to prore this
view cf the case ; but the Jury considered the attempt a failure,
and found a Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 2601.

SECONDARIES'
inquiry
toaa t ses COURT',3
damagesC 0L E MAN-STREE T., Jan. 17.
EARLS V. rowEt AND ANOTHER z
inra
Thaction of assault
and false wseits imprisonment.an The 'plaintiff was 'Cornelius Earle,
Esq., of his Majesty's Navy; the defendants were Powell,
toffisle.r.
,rslate Sheriff of Surrey, and Thomas White, one of his
*PLATT operied the case. The plaintiff Mr. Earle,
being hi October last on a visit at his mother's 'cottage, near
Shooter's-hill, was wrongfully arrested by the defendant White,
under the following circumstances :•---A bout eight in the
evenings a knock being heard at Mrs. Earle's kitchen-win-
dow, the plaintiff; with the maid-servant
ofeonrdant White, who said-- Youn Mr. r who
wanted admittance. On Mr. Earle's '
or 1 'gwa(et .tlnsri.,..;,ahre,
andsaw
ih e s tthrleee street-door; e
have
a writ
against you." The plaintiff seplied—
hseorulvsaaeomtwtnhheskettiMethirje:. Bevan. White again said—You are, and you
are my prisoner." Mr. Earle then offered to come round to
personbwua tsV tr
recognizedwh insistedhitoemh
he
b hya:o on
ei takingnl andlandlady,
custody
yhim
,wasthrough
rot
,siti ire
.
window, and did so, notwithstanding the aastuances of the maid-
servant
o me
Bevan. The plaintiff was then carried to the Bull public;
he was permitted to go at large.
Bull stables, where he wes detained a considerable time before
accordingly.,heSwuabssoeqveurtenatkleyn,
by White
as he wasanindaldnlibegratiediis
White and carried back to the
Sarah. Holbon, the maid servant, proved the dregging throußh
the window. Mr. Earle declared that he was rat Mr. Bevan ;
witness said the same thing, and remonstrated ; but all was
in vain.
Cross-examined—. Mr. Bevan was in the house.
Oeorge Farthing, a waiter at the,Bull, was present when Mr.
Earle first opened the window. When witness first saw Mr.
Earle at the window, he said to White, " that is Mr. Bevan ;"
afterwards, however, before M. Earle was pulled out, he told
White that he had been mistaken.
he was brought to her house, and immediately told White that
1 ' Ia m not
not
dtwhose'answerlhsauvl teapta"orl7ei:
agC;:itc:nizsis3b-eyeoxtTMlinpr:B—ne(M'vlaatnnhde'nlady of the Bull) saw Mr. Earle when
he had not get Mr. Bevan. White then said that he had been
misinformed, and went away. Mr. Earle was set at liberty
immediately.
Wm. Batting, ostler at the Bull, proved having seen Mr.
Earle at the stables, in White's custody ; but there was no
rr9of that this was subsequent to his being liberated at the
Itopec.—This was the case for the plaintiff'.
The defence was, that the case was neither one of malice nor
Indignity, 'White could not reasonably take the word of the
maid-servant as to his prisoner's identity, and Farthing evi-
dently was uncertain. As soon as the landlady at the Buil had
seen I,,fr. Earle, he had been liberated ; and there was no evi-
dence whatever of any subsequent caption. Mr. Earoire'sunonwne.
cqnduct, too, had been such as to wart-Int suspicion that he
acquiesced in the mistake to favour the escape
othodifeen:hoeselhrree.rivißraesysar
not
of:Ts:llasee violence.
prsntdjtprurt the • question, " At whose suit ?" and Mr.
elliive
eeevara
hadan sh was
aodnorl
we ay
to 101 ye
choosein
evidencethe b
tDisc..iat.
betweenh
edArta
had used
luulevents
ls ntil
(Mr. Collingrid e summed up the case, and
the Jury found for the plaintiff—Damages ti.