The Sun.
London, England, 1823-11-18 00:00:00

IX RE 0011RLA.Y.

On the LORD CHANCELLOR'S rising to leave the Court,
Mr. HART observed, that as his Lordship had now been put
in possession of an authenticated copy of the Judge's notes, and
had also received from Mr. ()outlay certain maps of the estate
regarding which this litigation had arisen, it would be satisfac-
tory to his Grace, the Puke of Somerset if his Lordship would
allow them to be deposited in the hands of some officer of the
Court, in order that they might be inspected by his Grace's
agent. lie did not presums to fix any day for this inspection,
but he trusted that his Lordship would accede to his motion for
its being granted, as it was of great importance that the plans
given in should be correct.
The Lora) CHANc ET.1.011 said that he was ready to receive
any plan that his Grace's agents might O'er to him in Court,
provided Mr. Gourley were also present. lie would after Wards
compare the plans of the two parties, and decide upon them
to the best of his abilities. There had been, however, so much
irregularity already in the prosecution of this suit, and so much
inconvenience had resulted from it, that he was determined
not to hear either party makes motion whilst the other was
out of Court. The Learned Counsel must therefore mention
this matter again, when Mr. Oourlay was in Court, if he in.
tended to carry any thing by his motion. Whilst he was upon
this subject, he would remark that he had received a letter
from Mr. ourlay on Saturday, in which lie had pressed him to
give judgment in this cause in the course of the ensuing week.
Now it was his custom not to read any letters which he knew
to come from the suitors of his Court : and in this case he
threw down the letter as soon as he saw the name of Gouda),
subscribed to it. Before he did so,. he had however seen
enough to inform him of what the general nature of its contents
werelikely to be. lie would therefore now say, that he would
give judgment in that case, as soon as he could come to a pro-
per decision upon it, consistently with that consideration which
was due to the interests of the other suitors of the court and
those other occupations in which his own time Was neces-
sarily engaged.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, N0v.17.
THE KING
.. v. MANTLE. _

Ir.''PLarr moved that the recognizances of the defendant
and his bail should be enlarged till next term.' . He was a mer.
chant residing at Calais, who had suffered judgment by default
to an indictment for a misdemeanour,. and who was this'day to
have received the sentence of the Court. Before the notice re.
quiring his attendance had arrived, lie had set out for Paris,
and therefore could not be brought IMO court this term. Under
these circumstances, the Learned Qounsel hoped the recog.
nizances would not be entreated. - '
The COURT observed; that if the defendant. should now be,
called,on, his recognizances would not be entreated till. next
term ; unit therefore, on his appearance in that term, is mo.
tion to stay,the estreats Might 'preient the forfeiture. This,
therefore,' would be the best course to pursue.
The defendent was then called on his recognizances, ant
The SOLICITOR.OENERAL Moved that his recognizances
be estreated ; which was ordered accordingly.

TAYLOR v. wavEss.
This was an application to the Court to set aside the outlawry
of the defendant, on an obiection to the form in which one of
the proclamation; was made.
•T ife COURT directed that the outlawry should be set aside,
on the terms of the defendant appearing, and putting in bail
to the action. -

THE SING v, J. W. TRUST.
The Soucrroti-Ogxenar, moved flir the judgment of the
Court on the defendant, who was convicted at the last sittings
for London, on an ex-tecio information charging him with the
publication of a blesPhemous libel on the Christian Religion
and the Holy Scriptures. •
The defendant, a young man, of respectable appearance, ad.
dressed the ,Court, and begged that tire case might stand for a
futtire day, as he wished- to piepare affidavits, and as he had
instruatal Counsel, whom he had only been able to see on the
preceding evening, and who had. not found time to prepare him-
self in the interval.
The Limn Oilitr • JusTICE asked who his Counsel WAS, •
and whether he was present..
The defendant laid Mr. French was his counsel.
he LORD CHI Er-JUSTICE inquired whether Mr. French
Wished for the delay.. '
MN Entarett'rose and replied in the affirmative.
The case was ordered to stand till Thursday.
THE ,ICIKO L ODER AW) tutgEswooP,
'The Scit,fc tVott-tiErttitAi .prayed for the judgment or. the
Court on Richard Older, a seaman, and Mary Ure.anwood, who