The Sun.
London, England, 1841-08-14 00:00:00

MINES.

0,000 ... .... Albion Copper
4,000 117 51. Alien l5l. sh 121. t 1 tpd 10
10000 ~,,.».. Anglo Nexican,iss. 5/ pm.lool. sh. a‘ 44 114
Ditto Subscription ..... ..... .......251. po I
2,000 pi, Rolanos ...... ......... ..... 150/. sh all p.l 35
10,000 U. 10e Brazilianlmp. iss. 5/. pm... 35/. sh. 20/. pd 5
6,000 ..... Macaubas & Cocaes United 25/.5h.2.51. pd 5
1,000 Ditto St. John Del Rey —2O/. sh. 14/. pd 2&,
IC ,000 !Soli var Copper Company 20/. sh. 2411. pd I
10,000 "...... Ditto Scrip .......... 10/. sh. 10/. pi 2
20,000 .... ..... British Iron lOO/. sh. 60! pd
,000 •••... Bril Mil Copper 51. eh. W. pd 1%
Cc. I Br.inca 64/. pd 8%
Candonga ...
10,000 11 Copiapo ..... ... 2Ol. sh. 131. pd 10
8,500 ... Cofiimbtan, iss. Si. pm 55/. sh. 55/. pd Oij
2,850 31. English l4/. Cs. pd 2
20,000 General MiningAssociation2OLsh.lBl. pd I%
6,155 Mexican Company lOO/. sh, 074/ pa 6
SAS
11,500 Real del Monte, Unregistered 2lj
Ditto Loan Notes Mt. pd 160
10,000 United Mexican, iss. 2 pm. 40/. sh. all pd 2%
Da, Scrip '.:' ys,
Ditto New Scrip 51 p 9 4
• West Cork ... ..... ...... ....... 501. sh 50/. pd 26

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

ROLLS' COURT, Aug. 12.
FOWLER U. SIR MATTHEW WOOD, BART.

Mr. KELLY (with whom were Mr. Turner and Mr.
Walker) on the part of Sir Matthew Wood and Jacob
Osborne, stated that the object of the present application
was to obtain from the Court an order that the issues
directed to be tried by the Court at the late assizes for
Glou-cester might be tried at the ensuing assizes to be
held at Bristol, in and for the county of the said city of
Bristol. By an order of this Court, made on the 23d
July last, certain issues of devisavit vel non were directed
by this Court to be tried at the then ensuing, but now
late assizes for Gloucester, and that order directed that
the trial should take place before a Special Jury, to be
composed of persons not living within twelve miles of
Gloucester, and an order to, that effect was made by Mr.
Justice Patteson. The parties went down to trial, and
in so doing his clients had *expended 3,0001., but
eight only of the jurors summoned appeared. He
accordingly prayed a tales, but that was objected to,
and he then submitted t 0... the. Court that the 6th
George IV., -Cap. 50, imperatively requirad that a tales
should be taken, but Mr. Justice Coleridge considered
that with a tales the trial" would he a nullity. It
was then asked that the trial should be postponed one
day. That also was refused. The postponement was
then asked for one hour that the Rristol coach, which
was supposed to contain some of the jurymen, might
come in, but this was refused. It was then offered to ,
try the issues with eight jurymen. This alio was de-
clined, so that there was no trial, and the Court sepa-
rated. These were the facts as regarded the direction of
the Court. It was now asked that the issue might be
Lied at the assizes to be held at the city of Bristol. In
refusing to complete the Jury at Gloucester from the
common panel, he conceived that the Jury Act had been
misconceived. The course with respect to issues di-
rected by this Court was to carry them into effect sub-
stantially ; they were, however, subject to the same
rules as any ordinary action at law, and were controlled
only by the special directions of this Court, which were
engrafted upon the proceedings at law, in all other re-
spects they were to be tried in the usual manner. This
Court might direct the trial to be had without a tales. It
might also direct a trial to be had in Middlesex, before a
Jury drawn from another county, or in any other way,
so that the proceedings were according to law.
Lord LANGDALE observed that the object of the trial
was to satisfy the conscience of the Judge who had to
decide, either according to the facts, or to follow them
so far as would be proper for working out the point re-
quired.
Mr. KELLY-It was argued that there was no power to
try the case except before a Special Jury, but that was
not according to the Jury Act. By that statute a Judge
in Equity had no power to direct that a trial should be
had before a Special Jury.
Lord LANGDALE waa,disposed to accede to that argu-
ment; an order of this Court was only an intimation to
the Judge at law that the Judge of this Court would not
feel satisfied with any other Jury than that specified in
the order of Court. •

Mr. KELLY submitted, that after the case was brought
before a Court of Law no choice was left, and that a tales
must of necessity b. impannelled at the request of either
party. This application was made by way of appeal, and
tile questions were, whether the issues ought not to have
been tried, or whether there was to be a failure of justice,
either by error or accident, or whether some other order
ought not to be made to carry it into effect, and whether
the jurymen should not have been called from the com-
mon jury panel. The Learned Gentleman then mentioned
two cases,. but without any references, and said that the
trial might, by the direction of this Court, be had at
Bristol, before the Jury summoned at Gloucester.
Lord LANGDALE observed, that an objection to have
the trial at Bristol had previously been made.
Sir F. PoLLocx, on behalf of the heirs-at-law of the
late James Wood, deceased, said that the Jury could only
decide who were the executors of a testator by the pro-
bate of the will. He could well understand why the
heirs-at-law did not proSecute the useless ejectments they
had brought in ; there they were certain of success.
From February, 1839, when 'Sir Herbert Jenner gave
his judgment in the Ecclesiastical Court, to the present
year, the alleged exectitors had been willing parties in the
passive proceedings of. the heirs-at-law ; that decision
was fatal to their right as devisees. From that time the
tenants had refused to pay their rents .to them, and it
was not till June, 1840, that the devisees sought to en-
force their claim. The tenants then filed their bill of
interpleader, and brought their rents into Court in order
that they might pay them to such of the parties as
should be ultimately found entitled. With respect to
Special Jury cases, even a Court of Law was in the habit
of granting a new trial when but a few Special Jurymen
attended ; but it was not a statutable right to pray a
tales when the trial to be had was founded on special
authority ; and such an application as the present could
not be granted whether the trial failed by error or
accident.

Lord LANGDALE could only consider that the trial had
failed by accident.
Sir F. POLLOCK said that, entrusted as he was with
the interests of infants and married women, he could
consent to nothing ; besides, if a tales had been taken by
consent, he much' doubted if there would be any indict-
ment for perjury. Mrs._ Goodlake was one of the wit-
nesses sought to be examined ; she had already been ex-
amined upon depositions in the Ecclesiastical Court, and
that evidence was on record. Mr. Phillpott was another
of those witnesses. Respecting him he should not say a
word ; he.was not about t 9 quit the country, neither
was there any probability that he would die berore the
the spring asslzos. The trial at the late assizes had
failed by accident, and had been made a remanet, and
must be tried before the Jury already summoned, if that
Jury was not discharged ; and it was so stated in all the
books of practice. If this application were granted
not a farthing of the expense incurred would be
of any use, since there must be a new record, fresh
Court expenses, and even the subpoenas fo'r the wit-
nesses at Gloucester would not be good by consent; there
must, therefore, be a new jury panel and fresh jurors.
The same Counsel also did not go that circuit; the heirs-
at-law, therefore, would have to retain Counsel whom
they would have to instruct over again, and they would
have to begin to learn all the facts of the case. But was
the fund in Court (9001.) the reason for these fresh pro-
ceedings ? " Not so," said Mr. Walker, " this trial is
to decide other points." 'Were the heirs-at-law, then, in
such a case as this, upon the supposition that this appli-
cation could be granted, to go and retain and instruct
Counsel ; and even when they had done so, what secu-
rity was there that the trial would take place ? The wit-
nesses might be gone abroad, and other difficulties might
arise, so that he submitted the Court could not see its
way. He denied also that
,jurymen were bound to leave
their county except in obedience to the Court of Queen's
Bench ; and if they went by consent they were not liable
to punishment. Did Sir Matthew Wood want the 9001.
in Court ? If so, he might have it upon givin proper
security to return it if the case ultimately should be
decided against him ; but if the case was to be tried, let
that trial be had in a manner and at a place where it
would be satisfactory. His clients were in humble cir-
cumstances, they had already expended 1,0001. in pre-
paring for this trial ; 37 witnesses had been summoned,
33 of whom lived near Bristol ; Counsel had been long
retained, and others not so well acquainted with the case
would have to be instructed, and even notice of this tip-
plicatien had been sent to Gloucester on Tuesday night,
by a special messenger, requiring the instant attendance
of his clients. He did, therefore, trust that this unusual,
unprecedented, and anomalous application would be re-
fused, with costs.
Mr. SHARPE (with sihotif 'Was. Mr. Barber) followed
on the same side.

Mr. KELLY replied, in the course of which lie, on the
put of his clients, offered to pay the extra expense which
the heirs-at-law would be put to by having the trial
taken to Bristol, and to submit to a rule for that purpose.
Lord LANGDALE said that John Fowler, the plaintiff
in this case, was one of the tenants of the lands of the
late James Wood; these lands were claimed by Sir Mat-
thew Wood and others, as devisees, and also by the
heirs- at-law, who insisted that they took by descent, on
the ground that there was an intestacy. The plaintiff
had filed this bill to protect himself from these conflict-
ing claims, and an injunction had been granted upon
payment of the rent into the Court. An application had
been made to the Court in this suit, which contained
two results—the one was to order the money to be paid
out of Court to Sir Matthew Wood and others, or to
put the case in a "proper course of investigation. When
this was discussed, both parties said they were ready to try
the question by an issue; and after some discussion certain
issues were ultimately settled, both parties proceeded to
trial, but as the order made contained directions to sum-
mon a special jury of persons not residing within 12 miles
of Gloucester, it was considered that the .ease could only
be tried by a Jury so summoned. The trial was directed
to satisfy the mind of the Judge in equity, and the order
imposed upon the parties the necessity of bringing the
case forward according to the rules or law. The direc-
tions were imperative upon the parties, but not upon the
Judge at law ; to him they were nothing more than an
intimation of what course was considered expedient.
Upon the trial being called on, the jurymen were not
there, and a question arose whether a tales should be
had. The Judge thought not, and considered
that the trial in that case would not be valid.
When the issue was directed this difficsilty did not occur
to the parties ; but as the ease stood he could new
only consider that the trial had failed through
accident. Was it on this ground
,to be tried at another
place ? It was his duty to divest his mind of everything
that had taken place elsewhere, and simply to regard the
questions between the parties in thiS suit. There might
be reasons for delay, of ,which he knew nothing, but as
the case stood, he had heard no 'sufficient reason for
changing the venue ; he put the suggestions of expense
and the inability to instruct counsel out of the question.
The 900/. in Court might be of consequence to the parties;
they might attach great importance to it, and it was no
small hardship to be deprived of counsel fully prepared.
The Court, however, must endeavour to decide on the facts
before it. The examination of the two witnesses might
be important ; but he was afraid, if he admitted that
as a reason, he might be called on to interfere in every
case similarly situated. The case, as it was brought be-
fore him, was curious, and showed that other objects
beside the trial were in view ; for one party said he was
willing to allow the money to be taken out of Court on
secury, and the other said he would rather pay the ex._
penses of the heirs-at-law than that the trial should not
take place. As the case stood, therefore, before the
Court, he thought it right to refuse the application.
Mr. Sum asked for the costs.
Lord LANGDALE said he should reserve the question
of costs till after the trial of the issue.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.—Aug. 13.
IN THE MATTER OF WHITMORE, WELLS, AND CO.
This day being appointed for receiving proofs under
the fiat against the bankrupts, who carried on business
as bankers in Lombard-street, the Court was thronged
to excess by the creditors.
A great number of debts, varying from thousands to
a few pounds were admitted.

TO NON-ELECTORS.

HOW TO GAIN A VOTE, AND USE IT WITH-

OUT INTIMIDATION

Every Reformer who is excluded from the list of
voters, and does not possess the necessary qualifications
to get his name on the register, may as effectually-contri-
bute to the return of a Reform Candidate as if he had a
vote for himself, and that vote 'Was protected from inti-
midation by the ballot; if he Will examine the list of
voters, which may be seen at the house of any overseer
this day, and make a note of the name anti address of
any Tory that appears on the register and is not in
every way qualUied. He should immediately forward
the information, with ground of objection, to some active
Reformer or Registration CoMmittee, who will object to
him ; and if he is unable to prove himself qualified, will
be excluded from the register, the onus of proof lying
entirely with the person objected to.,
Thus the Tory rote struck off will be one gained to
the cause of Reform, and given as secretly, if not more
so. than a rote given by the informant under the protec-
tion of the ballot!
Surely the thousands in the metropolis excluded from
the franchise, and those who.have been compelled to
sacrifice their consciences, and submit to the Most shame-
ful as well as shameless intimidation, will avenge them-
selves upon their intimidators, and thus regain the vote
their private interest compelled them to give against
their own honest conviction.

FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZETTE.

At the Cana at Windsor, the 11th day of .kiigust, 1841,
present, the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty in Council.
This da, the Right Hon. Edward John Stanley was, by her
Majesty's command, sworn of her Majesty's Most Honourable
Privy Council, and toiik his place at the Board accordingly.

WHITEHALL, Auc. 11, 1841.

The Queen has been pleased to order a writ to be issued
under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Ireland, for summoning the Right Hon. Henry Charles
Howard (commonly called Earl of Surrey) to the House of
Peers, by the stile and title of Baron Maltravers.
The Queen has also been pleased to direct letters patent to
be passed under the said Great Seal, granting the dignity of a
Baron of the said United Kingdom to General John Earl of
Stair, of that part of the said United Kingdom called Scotland,
and the heirs male of his body lawfully begotten, by the name,
style, and title of Baron Oxenfoord, of Cousland, in the county
of Edinburgh ; with remainder, in default of such issue male,
to North Dalrymple, of Fordel and Cleland, Esq. (brother of
the said John Earl of Stair), and the heirs male of his body
lawfully begotten.
The Queen has al.o been pleased to direct letters patent to
be passed under the said Great Seal, granting the dignity of a
Baron of the said United Kingdom to Valentine Earl of Ken-
mare, of that part of the United Kingdom called Ireland, and
the heirs male of his body lawfully begotten, by the name,
style, and title of Baron Kenmare, of Castle Rosse,lin the county
of Kerry,
The Queen has also been pleased to direct letters patent
to be passed under the said Great Seal, granting the dignity of
a Baron of the said United Kingdom to the Right Hon.
George Hamilton Chichester (commonly called Earl of Bel-
fast ), and the heirs .nale of his body lawfully begotten, by the
name, style, and title of Baron Ennishowen and Carrickfergus,
of Ennishowen, in the county of Donegal, and of Carrick-
fergus, in the county of Antrim.
The Queen has also been pleased to direct letters patent to
be passed under the Great Seal, granting the dignities of
Baron, Viscount, and Earl of the said United Kingdom, to
Charles Noel Lord Barham, and the heirs male of his body
lawfully begotten, by the names, styles, and titles of Baron Noel,
of Ridlington. in the county of Rutland, Viscount Campden,
of Campden, in the county of Gloucester, and Earl of Gains-
borough, in the county of Lincoln.
The Queen has also been pleased to direct letters patent to
be passed under the said Great Seal, granting the dignity of an
Earl of the said United Kingdom to William Fitzhardinge
Lord Segrave, and the heirs male of his body lawfully begot-
ten, by the name, style, and title of Earl Fitzhardinge.
The Queen has also been pealed to direct letters patent to
be passed under the said Great Seal, granting tl:e dignity of a
Baron of the said United Kingdom, unto Lieutenant-General
the Right Honourable Sir Richard Hussey Vivian, Bart.,
G.C. 8., and the heirs male of his body lawfully begotten, by
the name, style, and title of Baron Vivian, of Glynn and of
Truro, in the county of Cornwall.
The Queen has also been pleased to direct letters patent to
be passed under the said Great Seal, granting the dignity of a
Benin of the said United Kingdom to the Right Hon. Sir
Henry Brooke Parnell, Bart., and the heirs male of his body
lawfully begotten, by the name, style, and title of Baron
Congleton, of Congleton, in the county palatine of Chester.

Commission by the Lord Lieutenant of Carnarvonshire.
Royal Rifle Corps of Carnaryonihire Militia—The Hon. A.
D. Willoughby to be Second Lieutenant, July 23.
Commission by the Lord Lieutenant of Suffolk.

Sir H. E. Zunburi, Bart., to be Vice-Lieutenant, Aug. 7.

WHITEHALL, Auc. 9,

The Lord Chancellor has appointed John Pain, of Dover, in
the county of Kent, Gent., to be a Master Extraordinary in
the High Court of Chancery.

The Average Price of Brown or Muscovado Sugar, computed
from the Hein, ns made in the Week ending Aug. 10, 1841, is
365. aid. per Cwt., exclusive of the Duties of Customs paid or
payable thereon on the =poi tation thereof into Great Britain.

BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED.
THOMAS PICKSTOCK, merchant, Clement's-lane,
London.

BANKRUPTS.

GEO. ANTON and GEO. DUNCAN MITCHELL,
corn factors, Mark.lane, to surrender Aug. 21, at half-pait
ten, and Sept. 24, at twelve, at the Court of Baukruptcy.
Cannan. official assignee ; Amory, Sewell, and Moores, Throg-
morton-street.

JAMES NEWHAM and GEORGE PEARSON, linen
drapers, Ryde, Isle of Wight. Aug. 23, at three, and Sept.
24, at twelve, at the Pier Hotel, Ryde, Isle of Wight. Hard-
wick and Davidson, Cateaton-street, London; Randall and
Eldridge, Southampton.
WHITE, wrrE, ship builder, East Cowes, Isle of
Wight, Aug. 24, at eleven, and Sept. 24, at four, at the
Fountain Hotel, West Cowes, Isle of ‘Fight. Lanibert, Ray-
mond-buildings Gray's Inn, London ; Hoskins, Gosport and
Portsmouth.

_
JAMES SMITH, THOMAS EDGLEY, and BRYCE
SMITH, laeemen, Manchester, Aug. 28, and Sept. 24, at two,
at the Commissioners'-rooms, Manchester. Worthington,
Manchester ; Baxters, Lincoln's Inn-fields, London.
A BRA HANI FOSTER, draper, Bridgwater, Somerset-
shire, Aug. 23, and Sept, 24, at one, at the Commercial-rooms,
Bristol. Jenkins • and Abbott, New .inn, London ; Clarks,
Bristol.

WILLIAM LOSH and JOHN LOSH, calico printers, Man-
chester, Aug. 31, and Sept. 24, at two, at the Commissioncre-
rooms, Mani hester. Abbott and Arney, Charlotte-street, Bed-
ford-square, London ; Bennett, Manchester.
GEORGE THOAIPSON, victualler, South Shields, Aug.
30, and Sept. 24, at eleven, at ihe Bridge Inn, Sunder-
land. Hodgson, Broad-street-buildings, London ; Wilson,
or Warn, South Shields.

GEORGE NEWTON, builder, Martoek, Somersetshire,
Aug. 31, and Sep. 24, at ten, at the George Inn, Ilminster.
Craig, Harpur-street, Red Lion-square, London ;
Yeovil.

_
HENRY CIFTON, proctor, Worcester, Aug. 23, and
Sep. 24, at twelve, at the Offices of Hydes and Tymbs, Wor-
cester. Hydes and Tymbs, Worcester ; Hall, New Boswell-
court, Lincoln's Inn, London.

The following places have been duly registered for solemniz-
ing marriages therehi, pursuant to the Act 6th and 7th Wil-
liam IV., chap. 85:—
Bethesda. Swansea, Glamorganshire.

York Chapel, Swansea, Glantorg nshire.
St. Augustine's Roman Ca•holic Church, Preston, Lancashire.
DIVIDENDS.
At the Court of Bankruptcy, Basinghall-street.
J. Firth, licensed victualler, Webber. street, Lambeth, Sept.
4, at twelve.
In the Country.

H. Harris, grocer, Faversham, Kent, Dec. 27, at twelve, at
the Guildhall, Canterbury—G. B. Orchard, upholsterer, Bath,
Sept. 6, at one, at the Castle and Ball lan, Bath—C. Fletcher,
clogs manufacturer, Horsforth, Yorkshire, Sept. 3, at one, at
the Commissioners'-rooms, Leeds—T. Stanley and W. Wat-
son, cloth merchants, Leed4, Sept. 3, at twelve, at the Com-
missioners'-rooms, Leeds—R. Bainbridge, woolstapler, Leeds,
Sept. 4, at one, at the Commissioners'-rooms, Leeds—T. C.
Armsby, chemist, Wotton-under- Edge, Gloucestershire, Sept.
3, vt ten, at the Office of Mr. Bishop, Dursley--R. Fowles, J.
Fiwles, and J. Fowles, joiners, Rochdale, Lancashire, Sept.
10, at ten, at the Commissioners'-rooms, Manchester—J.
Hawes, common brewer, Stoke-ferry, Norfolk, Sept. 8, at
twelve, at the Duke's Head, King's Lynn—J. llebblewhite,
woollen draper, Kingston-upon-Hull, Sept. 3, at one, at the
George Inn, Kingston-upon-Hull—J. Ware, tanner, Tiverton,
Devonshire, Sept. 8, at two, at the Old London Inn, Exeter
W. T. Barker, plater, Birmingham, Sept. 7, at twelve, at the
Waterloo-rooms, Birmingham—G. Franks, hatter, Newcastle-
upon-Tyne, Seat. 22, at twelve, at the Bankrupt Commission-
room, Newcastle-upon-Tyne—T. Mullins, scrivener, Bridg-
water, Somersetshire, Sept. 10, at two, at the Commercial-
rooms' Bristol—J. Williamson, carpenter, Boston, Lincoln-
shire, Sept. 9, at twelve, at the Peacock Inn, Boston—H.
Keale, grocer, Liverpool, Sept. 14, at one, at the Clarendon-
rooms, Liverpool.
•
CERTIFICATES—Sm. 3.
T. Watkinson, jun.. and H. Watkinson, grocers, Meredith-
street, Clerken well—T. Treanor, hardwareman, Birmingham—
'l'. Ely, victualler, Nottingham—T. 13. Procter, lnnaticasylum
keeler, Stockwell, Surrey—FL Sayer, grocer, Ardingley,
Sussex—A. J. F. itlarreco, merchant, Newcastle-upon-Tyne
—J. Jevon, jun., innkeeper, Bilston, Staffordshire—R. Web-
ber and T. Bland, attorneys-at-law, Bedford-row—J. Wilson
and W. Criu,hton, calico printers, Manchester—J. Williamson,
carpenter, Boston, Lincolnshire—W. F. Dodgson, victualler,
Leeds—J. Huddleston, boat-builder, Monkwearmouth-shore,
Durham—M. R. Kymer, salt manufacturer, Bucklersbury.
PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED.

.1. Bromley and J. M. Brack, lead merchants, Commerciatf-
road, St. George's—S. Padley, jun., H. Perkins, and W. G.
Hole, coal merchants, Swansea—C. Smale and H. A. Harvie,
attorney', Bideford, Devonshire—J. Davis and J. Cliff, rd,
coach makers, Northampton—J. Funnell and W. Hawes, poul
terers, Brighton—G. Thompson and E. Creswell, attoroeys,
Manchester—D. Arthur and R. B. Topham, packers, Man-
chester—G. Grumbridge and E. S. Speakman, linen drapers,
Ratcliff-highway—J. L. and C. J. Clarke, drapers, Taunton,
Somersetshire—S. and E. J. Harris, nurserymen, Fordington,
Dorsetshire—S. and W. P. Ware, surgeons, Chard, Somer-
setshire—H. Ashton and W. Withmell, merchants, Liverpool
—A. Sellers and F. Pierce, baby linen makers, Exeter—E.
Hembry and I. Smart, millers, Frampton Cotterell, Glouces-
tershire—J. James, jun., and H. Leach, merchants, Newport,
Monmouthshire—E. Myers and S. Sternberg, pawnbrokers,
Cheltenham—G. R. and T. R. Chappell. fustian manufac-
turers, Manchester—D. Haigh and J. Stanfield, woolstaplers,
Wakefield, Yorkshire—E. and J. Marshall, pewterers, Clifton-
street, Finsbury—W. H. Story and R. Robinson, tailors,
Bond-street—M. and A. Wilkin, ship agents, Liverpool—G.
F. Whidborne and W. Ocock, surgeons, Judd-street, Bruns-
wick-square—J. B. Thomson, C. J. M. Witikworth, and J.
Gwyn, win,. merchants, Ramsgate (so far as regards J. B.
Thompson)—J. Smith, R. Beacock, T. Tannett, R. Ta'.lor,
S. Fletcher, and A. Archer, machine makers, Leeds (so far as
regards R. Taylor, S. Fletcher, and A. Archer)—J. Hall and
J. Barton, contras tors, Rotherhithe—W. Turnbull and T.
Cowan, jun., linen drapers, Wooler, Northumberland—P.
Ganter, M. Weildoogle, M. Ganter, K. Imbery, J. Tritsehler,
J. Ganter, A. Zepfel, and L. Brugger, German clock makers,
Huddersfield, Yorkshire. • •
SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS.
JOHN BAIN, baker, Port Glasgow, Aug. 18 and Sept. 8,
at twelve, at the Office of J. Dunlop, writer, Greenock.
WILLIAM LAING, cowfeeder, Edinburgh, _'Aug. 20 and
Sept. 24, at two, at Aitken's Commercial Inn, Edinburgh.
JOHN ROSS, spirit dealer, Portobello, Aug. 18 and Sept.
11, at one, at the Old Signet Hall, Royal Exchange, Edinburgh.
ALEXANDER MASON or MWONALD, merchant, In-
verness, Aug. 18 and Sept. 15, at one, at the Office of W. Pol-
lock, writer, Ayr.
JAMES IN GLIS, writer, Glasgow, Amt. ;9 awl Sept. 9,
at one, at the Writing Chambers of A. Fleck, Cla-gow. •
WILLIAM MUNRO, writer, Glasgow, Aug. 24 and Sept.
24, at twelve, at A. Campbell's Tavern, Glasgow.

T HE MARKETS-YESTERDAY.
CORN EXCHANGE.

This week's supplies of all descriptions of „rain have been
moderate. The weather being fine, tended to slacken tits
trade. Wheat hardly maintained the advance of Wednesday.
Barley, Beans, and Pease as last reported. Oat 3 firm, with a
slow sale. Flour as last reported. London average—Wheat,
7,508 at 765. 9d.
SMITHFIELD MARKET.

The supply was middling, the demand nt,t very brisk, and a
small reduction was submitted to in iilref; other articles as
last quoted. Beasts, 712 ; Sheep and Lambs, 8.266 ; Pigs,
630; Calves, 213. Beef. 3s. Bd. to 4s. Bd. ; Mutton, 4s. to
; Veal, 4s. 4d. to ss. 4d. ; Pork, 4s. to ss. ; Lamb, 4s. Bd.
to ss. 4d.