The Sun.
London, England, 1812-06-24 00:00:00

talk,

Sir F. BURDETT, gave notice, that on Friday
next he would "move to take the several Petitions,
on.this Subject into consideration.

Mr. WALLIS, 44f:it:IT to the Petition pre-
sented some time ago by an Hon. and Learre
Gentleman. (Mr. Brougham)- from Mr. Prender-
gast, on-behalf of two Native Bankers, resident
in the Province of Oude, of the rrnue of Doss,
stated that the subject was under .the conside;•a-
tion of. the Directors of the East India Company.
Baou. alum expressed the satisfactiom
which he felt at receiving this information, which,
of. course, would induce him to dryp his intended
motion ; should the Directors,_ however, not •de,
.terthine on affording redress to. the Petitioners,
during the approaching recess,' he should be under
the 'necessity of bringing- the subject under the
consideration of the House early in the next Ses-
sion' of Parliament. •

The Bahama Trade Bill went throtrgit a Com 7
thittet, the Report o .which was ordel'ed to be re-
ceived to-morrow.

The Bermuda Trade 'Bill Was read a third time
and passed.
Lord BINNING moved the further consideration
of the Report of the Mail Coach Toll Exemption
Repeal Bill.
Mr. BAN,KES moved as an amendment, that the
Report be taken into farther consideration on that
day three months: •
A long discussion ensued, in which Sir C.
Burrell, Sir G. Clerk, Mr. 0. Williams, Sir. E.
Burdett, Mr. W. Dun.ias, Mr. Rose, Mr. Wrot7
tesly, Mr. G. Johnston, Lord A. Hamilton, Mr.
Whitbread, Mr. D. Giddy, Mr.: W_ Taylor, Mr.
Banks, Lord Binning, and Mr. Home Sumner
participated ; after which the House divided

For the Motion.
Against 'it.

Majority
ORDERS IN COLIN CIL

.L_.,

Mr. BROUGRAM said, it was his painful duty, a
few nights ago, to call the attention of the House
to the subject of the Orders in Council, in a man-
ner which he was happy-to say was no lonuer ne-
cessary. An order had been issued this day, by
his Royal highness in Council, which, in his
opinion, and in the opinion of all the friends with
.whom he had consulted, was in every way satin-
-factory.- He should therefore move, before he,
sat down, That the call of the House, which was
fixed for Thursday next, should- be discharged:
He could not conclude withotit expressing his ap-
probation of the frank, manly, and proper Con-
duct adopted by his Majesty's Ministers. To say
more would be improper; as it might be attri-
buted to a sort of triumph' on his part, which he
did.not feel ; but to say less would be unfair. He
should repeat once again, that he, as one of the
public, thanked them for their frank and manly
conduct. It was fit that such an acknowle
meat, should proceed 11.0111,0:at side of the House,
because the fear of an ill-judged triumph, he was
persuaded,Operated often to produce the continu-
ance of measures which Would otherwise be-aban-
doned. He trusted, that the revocation of the
Orders in Council would produce a proper effect,
and -be taken as they were .Meant '.by a Govern-
, ent which he hoped was naturally friendly to 'us.
If, unfortunately, it should happen\ that this was
not,the case, he should be the last- man to say
that the Government of the country ought not to
be supported. He concluded win! nny.jug, -That
the Order of:the ,Dav for caling over the Blouse
on Thursdaytext, should-be discharged.. •
• Lord CASTLEREGn expressed his satisfaction
that the conduct of. Government appeared so sdtis-,
factory to the Honourable and Learned Gentle-
man. He was all along aware that when the in-
tentions of his Majesty's Govertnuentwere under-
stood, and freed from those misconceptions under
which it had labonted; all unfavourante impres-
sions would be removed. He begged it mightetot
be supposed, otter the declaration of the Honour-
able Gentleman, that Gol'ernment had departed
in any measure from- their on intention as
declared in that house. The. difference ,between
thein was, tint he (Lord Castlereagh) preferred.
Suspension to revocation, and the Honourable
Gentleman would recollect that suspension was
one course which he himself recommended. One
of his motives for taking a particular time •v.-as,
that he thought it would be more convenient to
those who were interested in the trade, to know
the precise period Of its duration. With this one
exception, the measure was time same as that he
intended. Having guarded against any mison-
ception .on this head, he heted the Hon. Gentle-
man would-not think that he was the less happy
to have received his approbation.
Mr. A. 13:knixo made a few observations in' ap-
probation.of the Conduct of Ministers, and con-
gratulated the House and the country on the step
that-had been adopted.
• Sir FRANCIS ThJRDETT approved of the conduct
of Ministers, and the ability and candotir with
which his Honourable :Friend Oh. Brottghani),
had conducted the
,investigation to this happy
issue—agreeing, in all that had been said by the
Gentlemen who had preceded him—he still beg;eed
leave to call the attention of Ministers to the sub-
ject of the impressment of American seamen--atul
suggested the propriety of an inquiry into the case
of Williams,

-Mr. GOLDBURNE said, that inquiry had been-J
made, and that a Right Hon. _Friend of who
would soon be in the House, would be able to

Lord CASTI,,REAGH assured the Honourable
Baronet, that all communications from Ameriea
were attended to with that care which the itn-
portar •e of , the -subject required, and that: a
list of all American. seamen in the service was
obtained from the American Minister, for• the
purpo:ie of adopting such steps as would be Satis-
factory.

.Mr. PONS 713 Y declared that,, so far as be un-
derstood the Gatette, it was to him perfectly sa-
tisfactory"; if America should persist in unjust and
unreasonah!e demands, though he had constantly
opposed the o:ders in Council, his vote should not
• be wanting to the enactment of those measures
which might be 'neeesisary to the dignity and cha'-
racter of the country-.
-Mr. WHITBREAD expressed his heartfelt satis-
faction that the revocation had. taken place, and
he had no doubt that it would be successful in pre-
venting a rupture between the two countries.. It
was impossible, to notice the joy of the manufac-
turing
districts ,on.the present occasion-, without
congratulating themselves on what had beep done.
On returnihg'to their estates, they would find the
people' quiet, peaceable, and employed. It was
unnecessary to .pay any complimentto the manner
in which his Honourable Friend (Mr. Brougham)
had conducted the invcsti2-,ation—the country
knew it .When one's own country was in the
right on any disputed question, there could be
little doubt as to the part which they ought and
would adopt, .but he was unwilling to anticipate
such a remit, and therefore should say nothing on
it.: He hoped that the differences with America
Would be immediately settled, and that some at-
tempt would be speedily made towards a peace
with France.

-The Orderfor a call of the Houses on Thnrsday
next was,then discharged.

TITI-IF,.S IN IRELANp,

- Mr. PARNELL rose to make his promised- mo-
tion on this subject. ..He began by observing,
that- no. -fewer, than nine counties- had expressed,
either. by petitions, or through Graiid Juries, the
necessity of some alteration in the tithe system of
lrelbnd. He was confident that a very general
couviction prevailed of-its being a great grievance
on -the lower orders of 'the country, and that the
Clergy themselves, would be glad ,of some commu-
tation. The maienitude of the evil was admitted
bv'the late Mr. -Perceaal himself, who had pro,
neeted a Bill for an alteration in the tithe system,
but who dropped it in consequence of supposed
diflituities In Me. Pitt's speech -On the Union,
that important authdrity confessed that tithes
were a great practical evil in Irelanda• and from
the zeal with which that speech was circulated by
the Noble Lord opposite, itavas reasonable to ex-
pect that some arrangements, as to tithes, would
have been the consequence of a Legislative Union.
The tithe system was ,by no means the same -in
.England as in Ireland. In the first place, the
people who paid tithes he:e were of the same re-
ligion as the Clergy to whom they were paid.--
In Ireland the proportion of Protestants to the
rest, of the population was as one to ten, comput-.
ing the population according to Bushe, Chalmers,
and Newenham, to be five millions. -With- this
extraordinary fact before the House, it was very
much to the credit of the Catholics, that they
were not the petitioners against the tithe system.
Their policy was not to ;rive offence, or to embar-
rass their great cause, by meddling with the affairs
of the Church. The next difference between the
tithe 'system here- and in Ireland, was - the
unsettled rates in the latter.
,There was, in fact,
no uniform system through the different counties;
a great deal was left to the--caprice of individuals
in levying them, and much of the oppression under
which the dandholder laboured was to be traced to
th:s cause: The next difference was the Collec,
tion. In England the farmer had recourse to' a
jury, in case of dispute with the clergyman ; in
Ireland, all such disputes were, settled by citations
before an 'ecclesiastical jurisdiction. The Hon.
Gentleman then quoted the case of a Mr. Battersby,
a eleagyrnan, who made a new demand, -of What
be called family-money, in his parish, and actually
sold the kitchen pots of a poor cottager for this
family-money. A ,court of justice, however,O af-
aterwards disallowed the clergyman's claim, and
prayed how unsettled was the. system on which
.he . haled: every consideration, in fact, which be
could give to the subject, convinced him more
and more how necessary it was to relieve the
lands older .11. Ireland froni the pressure of this
system. His plan was to appoint Commissioners
,to compute the value of the tithes throughout
Ireland, and then to substitute a county land-tax
for them until lauds could be obtained for the
, clergy.• He would therefore move, " that a
Committee be appointed, early, in the next Ses-
kion, to take' into consideration the state of the
law with respect to tithes-in Ireland."
Mr. POLE said, he should not trouble the House
at any considerable length, on the nresent occa-
sion : and he -hoped- that his Hon. friend would
not think that be meant any disrespect towards
him, if he did not again deliver nearly the same
speech which he had delivered to "the House in the
last session of Parliament. This he must do, if
he-answered the speech of hiS -Hon. Friend, in
which there was not one new argument, nor one
topic which had not been over And over again An-
swered in that House. The Hon. Gentleman had
done him the honour to make some reply to the
observations which occurred to his (Mr., W's.)
mind in the-course of the debate is the last session
of Parliament There 'were, however, only one
or two points of his Hon. Friend's speech to which
he should direct bis attention. The Honourable
Gentleman had -alluded, in the early part of his
speech, to what he alleged his (Mr. W.'s) feelings
to be, as expressed in that debate upon the subject
of tithes.. He would meat to the Hon. Gentle-
man-'s memory what he did really say on that Oc-
casion. lie (Mr. W.) had stated, that When he
first enteead into the corisideration of the subject
-of tithes in Ireland, he had a communication With
Perceval, and -other members a)f the 'Govern-
ment, upon -that subject, and that he (Mr. W.)
bad deelareci-to the House, that if he could thiel or
-discover any practicable _ mode for remedying the
inconvenience alleged to exist in respect to
tithes, he should feel himself to be the Most for-
tunate- man in liii Majesty's Government.

" he (Mr. W.) stated : that aftce a full consideration
of the question, he fOund that, in the first place,
upon inquiry into the merits of the subject, that
the gri&Vances alleged were by neemeans so great'
as supposed ; and, in the second place, thl-it he
found it impracticable, by any means which then
presented t eniselves, or could be devised, to re-
medy the grievance, :,without material injury to
all parties. The House, he hoped, would bear in
!mind, that, in the session before last, when the
Honourable Gentleman brought forward a motion
similar to this, that in concluding the speech which
he (Mr.: `V.) made on that occasion, he declared
that he would make it his, duty; in the Vacation
before the last, to investigate the question com-
pletely, respecting Irish Tithes : and be then
pledged himself to tome down to the House, in
the last session of Parliament, prepared to propose
a plan for ameliorating-the system of Tithcs in
Ireland, or at least to state the grounds upon
which his conviction -vas founded, that no. such
plan could be properly enNrtained. When his
Honourable Friend opened his speech in thelast
Session, Which was the very same speech almost
he had just now nowedelivered, he. felt himself
calle I upon to state the grounds ,why he op-
posed the motion his Honourable Friend then
made ; and the Hon. Gentleman most recollect,
that in so doing, he had.kept- the pledge he het].
before given ; anil that he did go deliberately
through the examinations of every system, and
every plan proposed upon the subject of tithes in
Ireland,- commencing with the plan of the Right
Hon.; "Member for the City of Dublin (Mr.
Grattan) proceedingnext-with the plan of his Han,
Friend, then with •Lord andi af-
terwards with all the'varions plaos.eversuggested'
for
the alteration cf the system of tithes in Ireland, -
and he 1111, on that occasion, humbly state, thet
he thought that not oee Of those plans could have
any, other effect than to aggravate the alleged,sul-
ferings of the lower orders of the people by eom-
Telling,: them to :pay a greater propor!Lion.of Tithes -
than they did at this moment. He (Mr. P.) Stated,.
that when the system with respect.to Tithes was
altered, itnvould'be calculated perhaps-for the be-
nefit of a few, but be manifestly inaurious to the
many ; andhe thoughthe had proved that there
_was
no neW plan proposed,hich, if carried into execu-
tion, would not be found manifestly unjust in its
principle, and in its operation.would make the
burthen of Tithes injurious and insupportable to
the great mass of landholders ip lrelande2 In
closing his speech, however, he had railed upon
his Hon. Friend, after stating how very much.he
felt interested in this question, to exert himself
in the course of the recess,-and to.nse all the ener7
gigs of his own ingenious- mind in deliberating
and methodizing his thoughts ; and that he-(Mr.
W. P.) pledged himself, if he brought in a- Bill
founded upon any thing like an eligible plan, be
would give his assistance in the fair and candid
discussion of it ; and if commensurate with its
object, that it should not want his support.—
Now the Honourable Gentleman, after hav-
ing had frill twelve months' time
.to deliberate
on this subject ; after twelve months have
elapsed since this statement . was made; he
came clOwn, not with any practical measure, but
repeated almost the very same speech with which
the House had been before indulged, and closed -
with the very identical motion he made in the last
Session of Parliament. Now, under these circum-
stances, he (Mr. 'P.) should not,—because he
thought it quite unnecessary,—go through the ar-
guments lie took the liberty of urging on thii
question hist year : but, in point of couttesy,
perhaps, he wes bound to make a few observa-
tions upon what the Hon. Gentleman had °tiered
respecting the plan which he.conceived would af-
ford relief to ,the persons alleged to be aggrieved
by the Tithing System_ in Ireland. Ile (Mr. P.)
,thought it necessary just to state what the conse-
quences would be if that measure were adopted,
which the Right Hon, Gentleman seemed to think
would be a remedy for the evils of which he com-
plained. The proposition of. the Hon. Gentle-
man Was, that there should be Commissioners ap-
pointed for valuing the livings of the Clergy of
Ireland as they now stood ; and this he under-
stood to be the Hon. Gentlenian's proposition.—
" I don't Wish to deprive the Clergy of Ireland
of whit they now enjoy ; brut I wish to ascertain
how, upon inquiry, I can remedy the evil com-
plained of,' without any injustice to them, and
for the benefit of the people of • Ireland." But
the first thing the HOn. Gentleman would do was
this : he would call upon the Commissioners to
value the present receipts of. the Clergy of Ire-
land. Now, he (Mr. P.) took upon hineseW to
state this, that, upon the average, the Clergy of
Ireland, in some districts of that country, do not
receive more than one-twentieth of the produce of
the land ; t and that, in almost all other parts, they
did net receive more than one-thirtieth.
rWe hope to he able to gli'e the remainder of Mr: W. Pole's
Speech upon this important que,tion to-morrow.]

Sir .TouN NEWPORT declared that •he had the
authority of one of the oldeSt resident Clergymen
in Ireland; to state, that if the Clergy were to collect
their own tithes, they would , petition for leave
to commute. He complained that the: promise
held out to the poorer persons in that kingdom
at the Union, had not been carried into 'effect.
In order to shew the hardship which the peasants
endure from the present mode ofcollecting tithe's,
he read a letter from a Gentleman in the -county
of Wexford, stating the case of a man named
Murphy, who was compelled to pay a great in;
crease, the Clergyman of the parish demanding
nearly double. Another case-was that in which
the Clergyman in New Ross gave notice to one
of the parishion4s that he would not receive his
tithes of potatoes till the whole was dug out of the
.ground. By these Means this person's income
was increased from 1000/. to 30001. per annum.--,
The Right • Hon. Baronet recommended most
strongly the necessity of adopting some measure
which should give- relief to the poorer classes,
and warmly supported the motion.
Lord CASTLEREAGH entered his protest against
the principles of legiSlation laid down by the
Right Hon. Baronet. He maintained that the
prOper mode of applying relief in any case where
grevance 7. as stated, was for the Hon. Member
who brought it under the consideration of Par.

For the, Motion

36

This

liament,. to point out a remedy. The Noble
Lord deprecated the practice of stating insilated
acts of What was deemed, oppresslon, as cruel to
the individualand inArious to the public. interest.
The Right Hon. Baronet would have' done his
Letter.if he had brought the particular laws

,
within the 'view of the House; and submitted a
motion for the repeal of the laws.' He denied
that any particular pledge had 'been given., by hint
on the subject. He admitted that evils certainly
do exist, but he could not suffer the property of
the Church to be conshrered in an inferior light to
any other species of property held under the
Crown. At 'thetithe of the Union, much pains
had been taken on the subject, but the difficulty
which then Was presented arose front the objec-;
tion tb interfere with the religious establishment,
and its consequent pecuniary benefits. He had
not. been able to discover any proposition.likelYto
remove the cause of complaint, yet he was dis-
posed to give.his assistance to the Hon. Gentle-
man, or to any other person who would prOduce
to Parljament a project, with a ViCNV to allay the.
discontents upon the subject. Until then he must
object to take the subject 'under consideration,
and therefore must, vote a,.,ainst the motion.

Mr. BA ZEIAM supported the motion, convinced
that any remedy must be attended with less in-
venience than the evil

Mr, M. FITZGERALD, adverting to what had
fallen.from the Noble Lord; maintained that his
Hon. Friend had made out a case sufficient to call
upon the House to
,accede to the motion. He
denied that there %vas any disposition to.enttench'
upon the -recogniied rights of the Church. He
enforced the necessity of.giving-some pledge, that
the subject sliouid be considered during the re-
ceSs,.and of e.xtending to lreland the same laws
which the f%; ,wr in England. is under the prO-
tection'of, in i-e.spect tcohis.tithes, and which the
unfortunate peuantry of the fortn,er country so
much requite. • .

SislITH declared: that he should be glad
to-sec a total ;change in the principles of tithes,
hut not without an ample- security to those who
had property in theM. If-he cotOd state to -the
'Uouse the -instances of oppression of which he
had heard and .read respectiofr, tithes in. Ireland,
it would make the feelings of-EnglishMen revolt.
Convinced that there 4vaS n 6 subject of greater
importance to the
_Empire, he should certainly
support the inotioa.

Mr. TIGHT asked, to whom were the,people of
Ireland to look for redress bet to their Repre-
sentatives ? The grievailces with which the sys
tem of tithes abounded were_acknowledged by all
parties, and he could not therefore perceive any
rational objection to the mition.
Mr. WILBERFORCE was astonished at the diffi-
culty of obtaining information on the subject of
the tithes in Ireland ; but it was evident that in
many parts of that country the peasantry were
much oppressed. It was a great advantage of the
Union, that it brought the condition of the lower
orders of the people of Ireland more completely
under the contemplation and consideration of the
Empire.

Mr/PARNELL made a short reply ; after which
the House divided-:-

.Agaiast it. ,31)
• . Majority
On our re-adiriission to the Gallery, we found
Sir-J NEWPOAT on .his- legs, adverting to the
thirteen Reports from the Commissioners of Na-
tional Education in Ireland, and urging the ne-
cessity of a pledge an the part of Parliament, that
they would at an early period enter into the con-
sideration of that most important question.. He
moved three' Resolutions ; the first stating the
importance of the subject—the second expressing
high. approbation of the labours of the Commis-
sioners—the third cleairing that the I-louse of
Commons would at the .coinmencement of the
next Session proceed to carry into effect that great
national work.

Mr. W. POLE opposed the motion, on the
ground that the fourteenth Report of the Com-
missioners, containing much valuable informa-
tion and opinion, was not yet quiteprepared ;
when it was so, it-would go .to the Executive
Government, who would prtpose: a plan accord-
ingly.
Lord CASTLERiAGH trusted the Hon. Baronet
would withdraw his Resolutions ; otherwise be
should be compelled to move the previous clues.-
tion on them.

Sir J. NEWPORT', hOW#Wer, persevered.
Mr. WILBgIiFoRbE said a few words against,
and Mr. W. SMITH in favour of the motion ;
after which, the previonequestion was -carried on
all the Resolutions.

Mr—LocKHART, postponed his motion respect-
ing the Marshalsea Court to Thursday.

Mr. WHITBREAD postponed his "notion on the
Toleration Act from to-tnorrow to, to-morrow
se'nnig-ht.

Lord CASTLEREAGH stated, that the subject
Isms under the innnediate consideration of his
Majesty's Government. . -
Adjourned at half-past twelve 'o'clock.

TRISH CATHOLIC.--All -Aggregate . Meeting of
the Catholics of Ireland was held in Dublin on
the lt3th inst. The object of this Meeting was -to
receiye the report of the persons 'appointed to
Manage the late Catbolic Petitions to parliament,
and to present their Addresses to the. Prince Re-
gent. Several Resolutions tit ere passed, by -Which
the Catholic Body continues to pledge itself to
the pursuit of the, repeal of the-whole of the e
disabilities.—CounsellOr O'Gorman begged
it might be distinctly uddeistood; that any ra-
rangements or conditions which -might lie con—
nected. with Canning's Motion in the House
-of Commons, would have no in-Kan-ice on the con.-
duct of the Catholics. of Ireland, as they were de-
termined to obtain their freedom uncondition-
ally. • (Loud applause.)-L-A Resolution was passed
for calling another Aggregate Meeting, on Thurs-
day se'nnight, and that the Board, thus autho-
rised to prepare the Petitions, shOuld have the
same leady for the cons,ideration of the Meeting
on that 'day.

A Gentleman named CORTY peformed on foot
28 miles in five //lours and ten minutes, yester-
day, fur a wager of 100 guineas:

PRICE OF STCC

Rauh Stock, 216 3151
Navy '5
per Cent. shut

LONDON rated b TIjON,!AS WOOD: ot. No: !35, Maden-line,_Cov\ent7ganlen.; and Publisb,ed -by WILLTAM ApIICiER SCRIPPS, South 11101 ton-street, Grocretiortsquaies

FROM THE •LONDON GAZETTE, JUNE 23

Trar-('dice Jane,

In consequence of the gall:xi:Au. displayed by the 2dl3.atta•
lion of the 47th Regituent in the defence of Tariffaihis.Royak-
Highness the Prince 'Reg•clit has been'pleased,' in the rtin,:
and on the behalf of his Majesty, to approve of the word
Tarifa" being borne upon. the colours' and. appointnieut4 of
the 47th Regiment.

MILITARY PROMOTIONS.
.111 fir. 23, 181'2.
Ist Reg.-Dragoon Guards, ('apt. James B. Mimi, from the
Regiment of Aletiron, to be Captain of a Troop, vice Her;
ries',7 who exchanges. • Cornet R. Bakington to, be Lieute-
nant, by Purchase, riee'Delap, Promoted. in the Wegimeat.
of Meuron. -

3d Regiment of Foet G:zards—David Baird, Gent. to be Ens'`,!
sign, by purchase; Moorhouse.' promoted.. • s
sth Regiment of P:::)t---Captain Nieholas, Hamilton to be Ma-j.,
jor, lice Ridge; action.
45th Ditto--Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel Hon..G.A. Chetwyni
Stapylton, from the 6th Foot, to be Captain of,a Company
vice For;ter, Who .
Menron's Regiment.—Captain W. L. Ferries, from the
Dragoon Guards, to he Captain of a Company, vice Delapt
who exchanges.

COrsican Itan6crs.—Major A. Schummelketel to have permal
neat rank in the Army.
BRV_VET:—To be Liciitenant-COlonels in the Army, INT;t7oi
John Bacon Harrison, of 50th Feet, 'Charles Cother, of list
(Foot, and Edivard Currie, •of 90t4 Foot. To be-Majors
the Army, Captains Charles Cornet ,Bacon, of the Gotif
Foot, G. Hewett, of :lid Foal, and' Herman Stapyltou, of
both Foot.

BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED.
Richard Chafrey, Maudlin, Devonshire, clothier.
Charles Cox Bartlett and John Burt, of Nortoii-dader-Harni-'
den; Somersetshire, tininen.

•BANKRUPTS..
'Thomas Nightingale, Watli ii;-•street, London, Ware!' ou em
to surrender June 27, July 4, at twelve, and August 4, at'
. eleven, at Guildhall. Attorney, G. Adams, Old Jewry.
John Newton;Stockport, Cheshire, grocer, July 3, at three,
B;and August 4, at eleven, at the -Warren Bulkelevy Arms
Inn, 'Stockport. Attornies, Messrs. Cooper andLowev
Southampttm-bnittlings, Chanceiy-lane, London or Mr.
, , Cheetham; Stockport. ' •
John 'Mason, 'Liverpool; merchant,. &ay 15, 16, and August
-4, at, one, at the Globe Tavern, John-street, Liverpool
Attnmies, Mesiirs. Cooper and Lowe, SouthawPion-huild.
(lAm:cry-lane, London, or Messrs. Orred and Baine4,
.
Russell, Ipswich, Suffolk„ maltster, July 14, 15, auk
'Augnst,4, at elev'en, at the Griffin Inn, Ipswich. Attornies;
Mr. E. Lowrance, Ipswich, or' Kr. Samuel Taylor John.'.
street,.Bedford-row, London., • ',' •
James Pitt, Swan-street, :Wineries, butcher, -June 30, at-
,
tw.!.We; Jaly 4, at on and August 4.„ at ten; at Guildhall,
Loadon. Attorney; Mr. E. A. Wilde, Warwick7squaret
Newgitte.strert.
,James Fowler, Portsmouth, mere cant, -July 2, at -one, 4, -4
eleven, And August 4,-Pat one,-at the'Crown lan, despoil,
• ''AttOrnies, Messrs. W. and J. Allen, Clifford's-inn, Londull,
•or Mr. Winkworth, Portsmouth. • •
Thomas. Holmes Warwick, grocer, July 1, 2,'.a.nd August 4'
'at eleven, at ;he Black Swan, 'Warwick. Attornies, Mr:
John Sinart, Staple-inn, London,. Or Messrs. Tonle; ow'
Ilerdon, War-Wick.
Thomas Carter,, Charles-Street,. Northampton-s4nare,
.dlesex„
.masher,inariuer,june i, July 4, and Att;u;t 4, t
tat Guildhall,. London. Attorney, Mr..F. W. Carta,
Lant-street, Southwark.

George Haley, Plymouth Dock, Devonshire, china-mcv_liwit•
June-29, July 3, and August 4, at e.leve,n, at t, t:
Nu, Fore-Street, Ply mouth-Dock. zOl-
- IViinborn, and.Coliett, Chancery-lane, lemdon,
,Peers, or Mr. Bozon, Plymouth-Luck.. •
'Molnar; Pott, 'PalmyOat:, Warwickshire, Lin-keener,
at five, 8, and AngtiSt 4, at eleven,..at the litch of Pr4:(:r,
Wielinyr Bridge, Staffordshire. -Attarnies, Mc!-,.;;T:;;-
and Flicks, Baytietes7builthags, Ilulbora, or 1`.1.r.
Nevill, Tannvorfa.
Thomas Tron3, Bil:-,ton, Staffordshire, woollen-tiroTer,
B,•and Aii,gust at t-w,dve,-at the Swan Tavern, Buil-op:ter.
Birninghwo. Attornies, Messrs.. his;-, in, Stevens, 111..ti,it.41
and Pears-e, 'Old Jc7.7:7, -London, or Mr. NVltateley,
mini )lai)I.
•
RiCkards, formerly, of Newgate-street, warr
hoGseruan, and late of Fetter-lane, tov,tun-ict:eper, June it2,:r
July 7, and August 4, at t•ii; at Guildhall, ILoudon.
tornev, Mr. Parton, WaN:look. •
dohn Titomas, Bristolptailor, June 23, at twelve, July 7,, n
August 4, at one, at the Greyhound Inn, BroadweP'
Bristol: Attornies, Messrs. Wiliteornbe and King,
jeant's-inn, fleet-street, Landon;or Mr J. H. Fraiilol
St. John-street, Bristol.

[thvidends, &c. To-marrow.]

South End, in Essex, and the neighbourhood
for several miles round, were on Sunday mai-nil/4
visited by a very :severe storm of thunder .ito'
lightning, accompanied by a shower of hail-stones
of uncommon size.' The thunder was trenico"
dous, and the lightning extremely vivid and Be'
were. It came on so suddenly, that several ladle'
who were 4thing at the time, could not• ret.re:at
quick enough to- escape the " pelting of the pits'
less storm.". The spire. of Rayleigh Church Oh'
struck by -the- electric fluid, and the lead With
which it was covered was stripped oft, and the
rafters were le't

BIRTHS.
On Wednesday last, at Hampstead-Hall, Staffordlhice, t"
Lady of Wysley Birch, Esq. of a Son.
On Thursday last, in -Red-lion-square, Mrs. Williams, 0f
,Son.

On the 20th inst. at Clifton, the Lady of Lion-tenani-CoW
Alorgan, Royal Glamorgan Militia, of a Danzirter,
On Saturday last, -Mrs. Bramwell, of Lincoln's-inn-fieb)
of a Son.
On Sunday last, the Lady of Mr. William Seymour, of
Stamford-Hill, of a Son.
On the 21 s t inst.. at Hull, the Lady of Captain John ,•
eholls-, of a Daughter. '
Yesterday moimitir,, at his house in Sloane-street, the L'4l
of Vincent -Stuckey, Esq: of a Daughter.

,
' " • MARRIED.
• On Monday last; at St. George's Church, Hanover-sqll re
Joshua S. S. Smith, F.,;(1. of Hampton Court, to Mrs.
tletlivayte, of the saint! place. • --• 11
Yesterday, at. St. Mary-le-honne Church, Adolphw
Dalrymple, .Esq.
,M.jor of the 19th Regiment of Light -19(iy
goons, eldest son of Sri Iftw.Dalrymple, to Anne, the ° •
daughter of Sir. James Graham, 'Dart.
The same day, 'at.lluritham; the Rev. Townshend Selo, ,j
to Charlotte SOpiiia, eldest daughter of the Right Hon..l''
Right .Rev. Lord George Murray,. late Bishop of St. David

• - DIED.
... On the lath inst. at Southaairion, Thomas Russell, Est
Captain in the; East Essex.Militin, -pf.red.eiyounest 50,3,0 r
the late William Russell, Esq. of Barninghain:Hal,
folk. '
tije
On thelEth inst. of a consumption,' at Hampstead,
2ath year of tier age, Hem-letter,, the wife of Mr. W. A.
Nctriman—ltreet,
Ott Friday the 11,111 inst. at Lady Ahereromby's
Richmond; in
_the 9th ye:tr of his age, • Ralph Aberes('''„
Cameron, second son of Donald Cameror, of Lochiel,.Es4,ier
On Saturday last, in Mitldox,street, Hanorrr-smare, 3' .
a long and painful iilll..!sS, Mrs. Stanley, sister of the Itec,lo J.
Grrevilie, and of thle. Rev: Greville, Rector or
ton, and of flonsell,:near Matlock - Bath, Derbyshire.- 03
• On Sunday afternoon, Mrs. Pallier, of Sloane-street, st
advairced age. • •
On Monday, suddenly, Samuel. Manesty, Esq. late RG0:1
at Bussora, and Aml,assador to,the. Persian Court.

KS YESTRDAY.

,
India Bonds, 3s. 9s. dis.
ENChequer Bills, 3,4 d•P~r

. ..
4 per Cent. 7.214 i , 3s. ss. 4s. dis. . ,
3 per Cent. Red. 56U Ditto, 3y. per day, 33. P', ,
3 per Ceut. Con. shut Ontnium, '24; li pr. ,4
Bank L: Ann.-15 1-13th 15 Cons—for Opening, 58 `C"
India F.toek, /
—/

n 8 •
HIGH WATER:VC LONDON BRIDGE TO-NIORJ:--
Morning, S 5 min, after 2. 1 Evening, 59 win. after_i