The Sun.
London, England, 1841-03-25 00:00:00

CORN AVERAGES.

GENERAL AVERALIE PRICES OF BRATISII CORN,
For the Week ended March 19, 18II,,made up from the Returns (1
the Inspectors in the different Cities and Towns in Englan: a d
Wales, per Imperial Quarter.

Wheat 63;. Od. Oats
Barley 333. 2d. Ryc ..... 365. 6d., rease .335. Id

AVERAGES OF THE LAST SIX WEEKS.

ST. ALBAN'S ELECTION COM-
MITTEE..--(THIS DAY.)

The Committe re-assembled this morning at eleven o'clock,
and proceeded with the evidence of George Taylor, who was
cross-examined by
Air. AUSTIN—Witness is a freeman of St. Alban's ;
changed sides in politics, when Air. Ward voted against the
fieemen. Knows the Rough Club ; is not a member. It is
only a place for chaff. Did not fill any office at the last erec-
tion. Wes not employed at all ; was paid for bringing in
votfrs something. Received a sovereign for his expenses and.
sometimes 10e. ' • they were Mr. Cabbell's voters. Mr. Lang-
ley paid him ; he gave ss i'ness the money directly he was
going off after anybody.
By one of the COMMITTEE—Mr. Langley is a boAsel!er.
By Air. AUSTIN—Went to the Verulain Arms, when Mr.
Cabbell was there, and shook hands with hirp. Wert there of
an evening afterwards.
Re-examined by Mr. lIILLYAnn—The money was paid on
account of exrewcs. Witness promissed Mr. Cabbell before
he was engaged at all.
Mr. HILLYARD —Did Dr. Webster at any time between
the vacancy and the election make an apOcation to you?—He
curie on the Thursday morning with Mr. Edwards. I was at
home. Edwards made an application in the presence of
Dr. Webster.

Mr. lllLLyAnn—What was the application Mr. Edwards
ma4e to you ?
Mr. AUSTIN objected to the question being put, until the
agency of Webster or Edwards should be proved.
Mr. HILLYARD submitted that he had a right to put the
question, as part of the proof of the agency of Dr. Webster.
Any act might be given in proof of such agency, and any
deela-ation made at the time might be given in explanation
of the act.

Air. AUSTIN made no objection to proving the act, but the
de, aration could not be received in evidence until the agency
of Webrter or Edwards should be proved.
The CII n IRMiN directed the room to be cleared, and on
our re-admission announced that the Committee had declthd
that the question should not be put.
John Pym Richardson was then called in and examined by

Mr. T;LBOT—Is a bookseller at St. Alban's. Voted for
Mr. Cabbell. Lord Listowel!, Mr. Webster, and several others
called on him the Friday before the election. They came to
the shop, and Mr. Webster said " Mr. Richardson, we have
called with the Earl of Listowell to solicit your vote and inte-
rest." Lord Listowell said nothing. I said I had promised my
vote alr: ady, and Lcrd Listowell bowed and went out. Knows
the George, kept by Nlr. Foster. Saw a paper with the
Speaker's signature affixed to it.
Mr. AUSTIN, to show how dangerous this examination of
the witness was, would observe, that the witness had been
made to say he saw the Speaker's signature to the warrant.
Now, if it were a warrant, it was not signed by the Speaker.
Mr. TALBOT—Have you seen any processions by torch-light
in which that warrant has been carried ?

Mr. AUSTIN objected the warrant shou'd be put in evidence,
if anything were intended to be made of it.

Mr. TALBOT wishcd to show how the authority of the House
of Commons had been treated at St. Alban's.

The CHAIRMAN said, that unless the object was to show
ihat these proceedings affected the case, by preventing them
to bring up evidence.
Mr. TALBOT thought he should be able to show that the
case was affected by it.
Witness saw a torchlight procession, with several papers
stuck on boards and carried before a band. Did not see Mr.
H. Edwards on that occasion.
Cross-examined by Mr. AUSTIN—When Mr. Webster and
Lord Listowell called they were arm-in-arm. Mr. Webster
canvassed witness. Witness had been canvassed before by Mr.
Grimstone. The roam was full then. Witness's opinions are
well known in St. Alban's, and witness rook this call of Lord
Listowell as a mere act of civility. Is sure it was Mr. Webster
who canvassed witness. Was canvassed by Mr. Cabbell. Mr.
Blagg was with him. There were others—the shop was full, in
fact. They all stood very near together. Mr. Blagg said,
" Here's your old friend again," and asked witness for his
vote. The applications in the two cases were very much alike.
Re-examined—There was no lawyer with Lord Listowell's
party. Witness had no conversation with any one but Lord Lis-
towel! and Mr. Webster.

Samuel Cheny examined by Mr. lIILLTARD—Witness is a
linendraper at St. Alban's, and a voter was canvassed on Fe-
bruary 5 for Lord Listowell by Mr. Webster. Lord Listowell
was present.
Cross-examined by Mr. ArtsTrx.—Witness is a Tory, and
voted for Sir. Cabbell. Had promised before, and told Lord
Listowell 'o. Had bren canvassed for Mr. Cabbell by Mr.
Storey, Mr. Gate, and Mr. Blagg. Mr. Blagg introduced Mr.
Cabbell to witness, and he promtscd Mr. Cabbell. It was the
ounterpart of what took place with Lord Listowell.

Thomas Wood examined by Mr. TALBOT.---Is a harness-
maker at St. Alban's. Is a Blue—that is a Tory. Was can-
vassed for Lord Listowell ( by Mr. Webster, in company with
Lord Listowell). Witness said he was engaged, and they went
away.
Cross-examined by Mr. COCKBURN—There were a great
many with them. Witness is not always a Blue—sometimes
is on the other side. Shifts the colour occasionally. Was
canvassed by Mr. Cabbell. Mr. Story was with him.
Others were there, but he cannot recollect who. Does not
know if Mr. Blagg was there. They asked him for his vote
in the same way as the other party.
Joseph Richards, examined by Mr. HILLYARD—IS a voter
at St.:Alban's ; was canvassed for Lord Listowell and Mr. We-
bster. in the presence of Lord Listowell.
Web-
ster,
by Mr. LEAHY—Was canvassed for Mr.
Cabbell, who was also accompanied by many persons. Mr.
Blugg was on the opposite side of the street at the time.
Robert Howie, examined by Mr. HILDYARD—Is a gardener
at St. Alban's ; remembers the Thursday evening before the
election was proclaimed; was before Mr. Webster's house ;
Webster came to the window, and addressed the people ; he
said he had brought them a good man ; he said he had brought
ten candidates before, and had fought the battle many times,
and never lost it but once, and he would fight it again and
again. After that Lord Listowell came forward and addressed
the people; had frequently seen Lord Listowell and Webster
canvassing since; they were walking arm in arm, and going
into the houses of different voters.

Cross-examined by Mr. LEAKY-Does not know that
there was anything very extraordinary in Webster saying he
had brought them a good man. It may be a common thing at
elections for persons who are not agents to recommend candi-
dates to the people. All sorts of people speak at elections.
Witness is in Story's employment. Story is the petitioner in
this case.

Re-examined.—Witness has seen Lord Listowell and Web-
ster canvassing at night. Does not know he ever saw Lord
Listowell without Webster.

James Armsby Doran—ls a voter in the Blue interest.
Was canvassed on the part of Lord Listowell by Mr. Webster.
He had a book in his hand like a canvassing book ; but does
not know its contents. Was on the hustings on the polling-
day about two o'clock. Mr. Webster told me what had taken
place at the hustings relating to Adams.
Mr. TALBOT—What did he say?
Mr. LEHAY objected to the question on the same grounds
that Mr. Austin had objection to a similar question in the early
part of the morning.
Mr. TALBOT submitted that he was now in a position to
entitle him to ask the question.
Mr. LEHAT contended that the Committee must decide that
Webster was Lord Listowell's agent before the question could
be put.
The Committee decided that the question might be put.
Witness—Dr. Webster said they threatened to send me to
Newgate. Witness said, what for? Webster said " Adams says
I gave him 101. to vote for Lord Listowell." Witness said,
jokingly, "Many better men had gone there, and he hoped he
would have pleasant company."—(A laugh. )
Cross-examined by Mr. LEHAY— Can't say if that was said by
Mr. Webster seriously. Witness said what he said as a joke.
He could tell whether Mr. Webster meant it seriously. He
was certainly agitated. If a similar imputation had been made
against witness, however falsely, he would have been agitated
also. He should not think it a joke to be sent to Newgate on
any account. It is very true that witness at the time might
have thought it possil le that the circumstance could not be
true, and therefore he treated it as a joke. When witness was
canvassed, Mr. Webster was not arm in arm with Lord Lis-
towell. Lord Listowell was among the party of canvassers. It
was much as other canvassing parties. Witness was net at the
hustings when the affair of Adams took place.
By the Hon. Mr. ELLlOTT—Witness did not see Mr. Web-
ster write anything in the book when he canvassed him.
By the CHAIRMAN—Witness has always been a Blue, and
that was known to Mr. Webster.

Robert Taylor examined by Mr. HILLY ARD—Had the su-
perintendence of the bar of the Red Lion on the Saturday
before the election. Mr. Webster came there—Goodspeed,
a voter, was with him. Webster told witness to let the people
hare something to drink. Witness supplied the people with
drink—did not receive money for it.
Mr. HILLYA RD—Did you put down to any •account the
amount of drink so supplied?—Yes..
Mr. lIILLya RD—Did ou do so in consequence of any direc-
tions you received from Mr. Webster ?
Mr. LEHAY objected to the question. The agency of Web-
ster must be proved before Lord Listowell could be affected
by any acts done by him.
The Committee decided the • question might be put and
the witness answered in the affirmative.

Mr. HILLYARD—To whose account did you put it down?
Mr. LEHAY objected to that question. It wa3 laid down in
the Wells caseithat agency must be proved before the decla-
rations of the agent could:be odmitted in evidence. But even
supposing the agency proved for a legal purpose, it wasmon-
strous to assume that he had the authority of his principal
for an illegal purpose; for doing that which in itself would
be sufficient to vitiate the election 3
Mr. HILLYARD contended, that this not being a case of
criminal prosecution, the evidence was admissible, and quoted
various authorities in support of his opinion.
Mr. LEIIAY replied. And
The CHAILMAN ordered the room to be cleared in order
that the Committee might deliberate.
(No decision had been come to when we went to press.)

WALSALL ELECTION COMMIT-
TEE-(THIS DAY).

The Committee assembled this day at 11 o'clock in the
Committee-room (No. 1. )—Lord Eliot in the chair.
Previous to resuming the examination of witnesses, Mr.
Sergeant' Wrangham applied to have an answer given on the
preceding day by the witness Joseph Marlow, expunged from
the notes, on the ground of its being hearsay evidence.
Mr. Sergeant Merewether resisted the application, and after
some discussion the room was cleared ; after an absence of
almost an half-hour, counsel were called in, and the Chairman
announced that the Committee had decided that the answer
made by the witness, so far as it related to declarations made
by his wife, should be s' ruck out.
Joseph Marlowe was then examined by Mr. Sergeant MERE-
WETHER.—Was at the New Inn, on the day of the election,and
remained there from one o'c'ock in the afternoon till next day. Saw
otherelectorsthere. Could not tell thenames of the personswho
came into the room in which he was, in the New Inn, on ac-
count of his get ing tipsy. Went to bed subsequently, and
on awakening expressed a desire to go out of the inn; but a
person outside the room told him he could not get out, as he ( wit-
ness) hal not sufEient s'ecp. The door was afterwards opened, and
Mr. Boast came in and assisted witnessto dress. Could not say
what time of night it was then. Went down-to a large.room
where several electors and other persons were sitting and walk-
ing about. Among tho:e persons were Mr. John Taylor,
anctioneer, and Mr. Wood. Witness expressed a wish to get
home, but was detained on account of the mob quarrelling out-
side the house. When the mob had dispersed, witness went
home accompanied by the two Messrs. Bu=st. Was told that
the Messrs. Busts accompanied him home.
Mr. Sergeant WKANGIIAM objected to anything' the wit-
ness was told by others being given in evidence.
Examination resumed—Witness had a recollection of having
been accompanied by the Illesrs Bursts. Went in the morn-
ing about seven o'clock to the Stork Tavern, and took
breakfast there. The Messrs. Bu=st accompanied witness from
his own house to the Stork. After a short time went up and
polled. A great many others also went up from the Stork and
polled. Paid nothing for V% hat he eat or drank at the Stork.
The cross-examination was proceeding when we went to press.

---
BRUSSELS, MAItCEI 21.—After a Council of
Ministers there was to day, at noon, a General Council at
the Palace. Nothing has transpired; consequently all the va-
rinus reports which are spread deserve no credit.
Viscountess Palmerston and Lady Fanny Cow-
per left town on Tuesday, fir Brighton, where their Lady-
ships intend passing a few days.

IM PORTANT NEWS

FROM THE
NTTEID STATJ'_:S.

By the arrival of the Patrick Henry at Liver; •
pool yesterday afternoon from New York,. iv,
have received American Papers to the Bth 10,1t'
inclusive—being seven days later than the la
arrivals. They be.- rin -the Inaugural Addreo °f
the new President, General Harrison, on assn l:
ing office—a summary of a debate in the Setia.r,
on the relations between the United States suit:,
Great Britain—and the strictures of the Joura#f
upon the same subject. We subjoin the addres';
and the spirit of the Journals, referring e°
readers to our leading columns for the debate ,_
the Senate.. We have great pleasure in obse'vra
ing that the tone of the whole intelligence fm°
the United States is decidedly pacific, and ill
t
there is every probability that Mr. M'Leod AV
be delivered over without trial to the British at_lt
thorities in. Canada. We may here state
the Patrick Henry made the voyage from IN t'rs.
York to Liverpool in fifteen days and ten-11111e
As the Patrick Henry was clearing out t
tOscius entered, having sprung her mainal3'
during a severe gale in her passage out.

INAUGURAL ADDRESS.
Called from a retirement whieh I had supposed leas te
tinue for the re-idue of my life, to fill the chief executive or.ti,
of this great and free nation, I appear before you, fellow 15
zees, to take the oaths which the constitution prescr.bes:tie
necessary qualification for the performance of its dut. es.a, end
ie obedience to a custom coeval with our governmeu_esees
what. I believe to be your expectations, I proceed to P:e ie
to you a summary of the principles whi h will govern °lO to
the dscharge of the duties which I shall be cared or
perfrm.
Ito was the remark of a Roman Consul, in an early
of that celebrated Republic, that a most striking coMowerasr end
observable in the conduct of candidates for offices of p.,iag
trust, before and after obtaining them—they seldeenelfrjtbe
out in the litter cese the pledges and promises made n-reeedt
former. However much the world may have ,
in many respects, the lapse of upwards of two thousanii„of
since the remark was made by the virtuous and inclebejoe
Roman, I fear that a strict examination of the annals of pose
of the elective governments, would develope similar ins
of v:olated confidence. laireieo
Although the fiat of the people has gone forth, roe pen
me the Chief Magistrate of this glorious Union, nothing. 0-
their part remaining to be done, it may be thought that toy
tive may exist to keep up the delusion under which the,Ys and
be supposed to have acted in relation to my prineiKepele
opinions; and perhaps there tray be some in this ass, 011
who have come here either prepared to condemn thee, tcitlr
now deliver, or, approving them, to doubt the sincertlf_.
pill
which they are uttered. But the lapse of a few reont°'
confirm or dispel their fears. te be
The outline of principles to govern, and measures be
adopted, by an Administration not yet begun, will,w;ither
exchanged for immutable history; and I shall stand
ass of
exonerated by my countrymen, or classed with the tvitlr
those who promised that they might deceive, and flattery"'
the intention to betray. heel
However strong may be my present purpose to rea._, ese
expectations of a magnanimous and confiding people, I ;ger
understand the infirmities of human nature, and the uttioei•
ous temptations to which I shall be expOsed, from thee. fieoele
tude of the power which it has been the pleasure of t"`‘,' gee
to commit to my hands, not to place my chief confidenoteeten
the aid of that Almighty Power which has hitherto Pler
me, and enabled me to bring to favourable issues ell' to ins
portant, but still greatly inferior trusts, heretofore confide"
by my country. rests
The broad foundation upon which our Constitutiloalls
• being the people—a breath of theirs having made, a' se, Dose
can unmake, change, or modify it—it can be assigned 'o"erec)::
of the great divisions of government but to that of do sister'
If such is its theory, those who are called upon to adro°, 'bapieS,
must recognise, as its leading principle, the duty of reate n
their measures so as to produce the greatest good to the fet coe'.;
number. But, with these broad admissions, if we w°n, of °.;
pare the sovereignty acknowledged to exist in the M36' cell
eeople with the power claimed by other sovereienties,:je, eo
those who have been considered most purely jernocraiao
shall find a most essential difference. All others lay eef oar,
power limited only by their own will. The majority'
areas'
citizens, on the contrary, possess a sovereignty with ariotee te'
of power precisely equal to that which has keen grothit
them by the parties to the national compact, and right
beyond. We admit of no government by Divinene6sea
—believing that, so far as power is concerned, the he an flee
Creator has made no distinction amongst men—that ht
Cove
upon an equality, and that the only legitimate rti'otel'
govern is an express grant of power from the st eon'
The Constitution of the United States is the instrunse_°oo,,,,r
tainirg this grant of power to the several departments
ing the Government. On an examination of that insoa sole:
it will be found to contain declarations of power grant.e.iat, Oh'
power withheld. The latter is also susceptible of dift't whie;
power which the majority has the right to grant, loned ties
they did not think proper to intrust to their agents ; 7,5,1
which they could not have granted, not being Pc!„.sbts efe
themselves. In other words, there are certain cote(
sessed by each individual American citizen, which, in ;one cle
pact with the others, he has never surrendered. , ligoag
them, indeed, he is unable to surrender, being, in the 11 a
of our system, unalienable. biel
The boasted privilege of a Roman citizen was to biro ajeersr
only against a petty provincial ruler, whilst the proud de,', for*
of Athens could console himself under a sentence of deaTotderi
ailments
.toincor,,
supposed violation of the national faith, which no onekereeel,
stood, and which at times was a subject of the Mise„ed
all, or of banishment from his home, his fainill, itfr
country, with or without an alleged cause ,• thattecroc.
the act, not of a single tyrant, or hated tris is il,
bat of his assembled countrymen. Far different one
power of our sovereignty. It can interfere with nose,„ to
faith, prescribe forms of worship for no one's obserca'teet;
diet no punishment but after well ascertained goilt'etititt'
investigation
suit of under rules prescribed by the Ones
itself. These precious privileges, and those scarcely jot,
portant, of giving expression to his thoughts andeellabli"
either by writing or speaking, unrestrained but by ,tb:
for injury to others, and that of a full participation I'l6o 0
advantages which flow from the Government, the or
ledged property of all, the American citizen derives Teceiii,
charter granted by his fellow man. He claims thelP, ;501
he is himself a man, fashioned by the same Almightlbeble'r
the rest of his species, and entitled to a full share of
tee
ings with which he has endowed them. bS", of
Notwithstanding the limited sovereignty posse's- All" e
people of the United States, and the restricted ereeongo
power to the Government which they have adopte,_,4'eh it weo
has been given to accomplish all the objects for or bithe,",e
created. It has been found powerful in war, low ertt'ee
justice has been administered, an intimate union's
domestic tranquillity preserved, and personal libertYfros sa;
to the citizen. As was to be expected, however' 0 °f.
defect of language and the necessarily sententicates bsoi
nor in which the Constitution is written, disP setre.o•
arisen as to the amount of power which it lois petS_.or
granted, or was intended to grant. This is nor.oteens
larly the case in relation to that part of the les rerog
which treats of the legislative branch. And not oblY gi‘r.lrod
the exercise of powers claimed under a general etanscarrY It
that body the authority to pass all laws necessary to also, ces
effect the specified powers, but in relation to the latter.ln ,teo
is, however, consolatory to reflect, that most of thccoosti!t6b-e
of alleged departure from the le•ter or spirit of the °foe
tion have ultimately received the sanction of a orNe most or
people. And the fact that many of our statesmen, e tieethe
tinguished for talent wed patriotism, have been, at eech of ice
other of their political career, on both sides of ea,oferu"tee
most warmly disputed questions, forces upon us thewe to iii'that the errors, if errors there were, are attribat%g the 06
intrins!c difficulty, in many instances, of ascertati than
tcnt.ions of the framers of the Constitution, rat"- ft,"
influence of any sinister or unpatriotic motive. , grea'a
But the great danger to our institutions does not ra„te
me in a usurpation by the Government of power nOlegrastru(tee
the people, but by the accumulation in one of the," a, arateo
of that which was assigned to others. Limited bete ,of
powers which have been granted, still enough, je, 00- 0
granted to constitute a despotism, if coneentratoebute„eth 8,5
es
the departments. This danger is greatly he',
ajou, °'
t heir
has been always observable that men are less :le „poo
croachments of one department upon another, than tbei
own reserved rights. e ft° est
When the Constitut ion of the United States first earrii.ie step
hands of the Convention which formed it, many ti the P° ore
republicans. of the day were alarmed at the extent 0 end piths
which had been granted to the Federal Governmenteed too_ea
particularly_ of that portion_ which had been assi.gi: arpe,elo,
Executive branch. There were in it features eavf repre ,ef
not to be in harmony with their ideas of a sitorleoeq), a
tative democracy, or republic. And knowing the .ceeci
power to increase itself, particularly when ex
no eerY_.e,
single individual, predictions were made that, at
virtual ,T.e
mote period, the Government would terminate inteare of t'bes
narchy. It would not become me to say that thc.neertlY.os,
patriots have been already realized. But, as s,seopini_oo-
- that the tendency of measures, and of Tuen.t I
for some some years rest, has been in that directiona,cla_ior, tor
ceive, strictly proper that I should take this 0_ dete_an'ily
peat: the assurances I have heretofore given 01 it',•7f it reeph
nation to arrest the progress of that tendeneY! title t!a„,eie
exists, and to restore the Government to its pri!,
and vigour, as far as this can be effected by au.' oy
exercise of the power placed in my hands. cauieti-
I proceed to state, in as summary a manner a' e$
i„,
opinion of the sources of the evils which have her bed' le
sively complained of, and the correctives whie
be fens are
plied. Some of the former are unquestionably totiolaeot,
the defects of the Constitution ; others, in my'injsions•,ool
attributable to a misconstruct o
ion f some of its Pr;) to a se;,.son
the former is the eligib lit of the same individir_aeqr. fea,ade,
term of the Presidency. The sagacious mind ci
,",ebeeor the
Only saw andlamented this error, and attempts ha ewer °'
hitherto without success, to apply the amen
of e'
State to its correction.
,ower. -s
As, however, one mode of correction is in the r
_,„,
datory
President, and consequently in mine, it would :Jill the
,u,re,
perhaps invidious, to enumerate the evils of whi
,n_ sages
framednionof
them an of
Constitutionur fellow
mayw e
have
tai zveenbs
etehni s
the
r est.()
aioftf.ctZa„ atl ce t o
it contivti ge'
ter fruits which we are still to gather from it,
ere, 35 soon
disfigure our system. It may be observed, how, r error
neral remark, that republics can commit no greaee, „verve",
to adopt or continue any feature in their systems %
ore of Volt
which may be calculated to create or increase the.lettitoeoely
in the bosoms of those to whom necessity obligentu,s silkwor en
themanagementoftheiraffairs. And surely notht et.irg
to produce such a state of mind than the long con ling, no to
office of high trust. Nothing can be wore Corr' belong
more destructive of all those noble feelings
the character of a devoted republican Patthrie° We'" nevere-
corrupting passion once takes possession of
.It i 5 the'rOW an
les is
like the love of gold, it becomes insatiable.
dying worm in his bosom, grows 11.1cstirag, • eitfhte 'sec
strengthens with the declining yen"
republic to Witte d t e
true, it is the part of wisdom for a has entruste
vice of that officer, at least, to whom she
execution her
shoe
management of her foreign relations, the eteo a Peri°ds° she
and the command of her armies and navies,tbe
accountableii el an
as to prevent his forgetting that he, is
the
waster. Until
not the principal—the servant, not,ected, public
ntewipg
amendment of the Constitution can r
be
e 'aid to it, bY censor
may secure the desired object. I give my
c.r_..rasae
eeoe
the it be
I consent to serve a second term.
liberty front,it to the
ledged if there is danger to Public'n the want of theret
the pledge heretofore given, that, under no
•
ledged defects of the Constitution,
a misconstrueti° cant;
is, I apprehend, not much less from
actually givle:eer et
'of
instrument, as it regards the powers
any or c a Pir" r
not conceive that, by a fair construction,stitute the Presidentt.
continuance of the Executive power in the same hanr, of Oa
provisions would be found to constitute
be
claimed from
ahecorpiie;
the legislative power. It cannot
common with ei •Lr colt
it is a privilege which he holds _
ething moped, the
c swu ae-
citizen. And although ther be
measures recommendeeette
the
fidence in the propriety of
bligations.of
to recommend, since, although enjoined as a duty .„I:re nth
one case than in the other, in the o