The Sun.
London, England, 1815-06-07 00:00:00

SALARIES OF CONSTABLES IN IRELAND.

`Mr. lier.;E rose, pursuant to his notice, to. Move
for -leave to, bring in a Bill to enable the Graud
%ivies in Ireland to allow larger Salaries to the
ConStahles. The sum which the Grand. Juries
was at present empowered to grant, was only 81.
a year, a sum too small to procure the services of
men who were fit for the situation, which was one
of great importance in the preservation of the
peace of that country. There were two otherob-
jects which he wished to include in this Bill, one
was to enable Grand Juries, with the consent of
th►e Lord Lieutenant, to grant a superanuation to
old Constables, who had, for a certain number of
years, faithfully and diligently performed their
duty ; and the uther• was to empower the Grand
Juries to present for the necessary sums for re-
moving convicts, from the goals in Ireland.
After a few words from Sir C. MONK and Mr.
CALCRAFT, the motion was agreed to.
Mr.PF.ELE then moved,that the Art of 4I George
Sd:he read, Which being done, the House resolved
itself into a Committee on the said Act.
• M ASTER OF THE, ROLLS IN IRELAND.
. Mr. PEELE proceeded to state to the Committee
time ground upon which he meant to propose an
.increase of the salary of the Master of the Rolls
in Ireland, and of the sum to be allowed to him
on his retirement. He proposed to add 8001. a-
year to the salary, which being now 35001. would
make 43001. a'-year, and to add 6001. a,,year to the
sum allowed. to the Master 'of the, Rolls on his re-
tirement, which being.:now 27001. would make it
33001. a-year. In the. last Session of Parliament
a Bill passed that House to increase the Pension
to the Master of the 'Lolls,-on his retirement,

6001 a-year, which, was the sum now proposed 5
• but no increase was matte to the salary. So that
in fact the sum granted upon the retirement would
bare been nearly equal to the full salary. This ar-
rangement , upon consideration, appeared to him so
improper that he withdreo that Bill; but the flouse.
then fatly sanctioned the measure of increasing the
retirement to the Master of the Rolls to the
amount now proposed. The present salary of the
Master of the Rolls in Ireland was fixed in 1801
since that time the salaries of the Puisne Judges
• in irelaod had been increased, and put upon a
footing with those .of England. The.office of
Master of the Rolls was next in point of dignity
to the Chief Justice of the King's Bench; it was
superior in rank to the Chief Justice of the Com-
mon Pleas and the Chief Baron of the Exchequer.
In determining the amount of the increase of sa-
. Jury there were two principles upon which lie
might proceed, either to put the Master of the
Rolls in Ireland upon a footing with the, Master
of the Rolls in England, making allowance for the
lncritire Tax, which was paid by the latter, or he
might increase the salary to make it bear the
sarue proportion to the salaries of. the Irish
Puisne Judges that it, did .before their sala-
ries were raised. But whichever principle •be
alopted, the result would be the same, viz.
that the_anginentation would be 8001. The pro-
position which he was now making had the ap-
probation both of the late and present Chancet-
i.:rs of Ireland, though he was aware that -he
could not urge that circumstance as a reason' to
utduce the ommittee. Before he concluded, he
thought himself bound in justice to state, that the
• preSent Master of the Rolls in Ireland had uni-
forndy discharged the duties of his office in a man,
tier %ila!' gave, the highest satisfaction to the
suitors iu -his court, arid to the bar. He then
moved the Resolution.
Mr. ABgRCRONIBIE apprehended that by this. regulation
the silary of the Mater of the Ruth in Ireland would be
wde greater than that of the same Officer for Englund; the
latter being, he believed, only 400 p 1. a year, with a house.
'lnc business also dune by each of these Officers bore- no
comparison, as much more labour Was performed by -the
:'‘laiter in England. He- therefore thought the subject re-
quired much cunsideratiutt,.:as the increase appeared in the
light of a rellininary to the removal -of the Officer in
•

question,
PEELE, ia. explanation,. denied the last inference
which the flon. Gentleman had drawn. He added that the
2.1.43ter of the Rolls in Iretand was su-I,.frcted, to the Income
'fax, from nßich that ()nicer in England was exempt.
Mr. HORNER decidedly pro,tzsted 'against the measure, on
all the. grounds urged by Mr. Abercrombie. Ile thought
when the Irish Judges came year after year for an increase of
tht suhjkiet required [Wire attention, in such times as
th,'''ittnt‘4 the IL>tise app:.areddivosed to g; re to it.—lt was
ri tiAd. precedent. • Perhiras
) ass;! 1t ,r year the Lord Chancel-
la.lreland might lie h' ronglit3%,rwa-rd as an object for an
•• Ca-se
,dhay, by the \ln' ter of the Rolls.
Mc. MILLE aid Mr.IIORNE.K
explAilL $
iedwith souse &Kau
Mr. Wrii'fl3a2,,l said a few words.in defence of the re-

marks of Mr. corner ; denyieg thit he tetld mean to threw
any perSonalimputation Cu the individuals sn question•
Mr. LOCKHAWI' tholglit this measure might lead to a
burthen on tile country. by inducing Masters of the Rolls to
fetire, Tbe last person who held this situation had not rea
tired from 01 health. But be had a still more serious objera
iiyl to it, -as such gtauts, .so sepeatedly• and easily wads)
te:ltled to render the great Law-officers more 'dependant on
the Crown than they otherwise would be. Forthese reasons
he felt a considerable repugnance to-such frequent applica-
tions: he was uot, however, inclined to oppose the preseelt

grant.
Mr, ABERCROMBIE said the House ought to he in pos-
session cif some documents to show the necessity of this in-

crease.. .
The-q Yestion was then pet and carried, and the Report was
ordered to he received tu-morrow.
Mr. JOHNSON presented certain Accounts relative to Fines
in Ireland.

WOOL TRADE.
Mr. WESTI.RN, after rations observations, moved for a
Committee to topsider of the Acts imposing Duties on Dtitish
WOollsold bv auction.
.- Mr. FRANKLAND LEWIS seconded the moti(.o, and ar4
gned that whatever was practicable should be -dime for the
farmers. The Corn Bill had dot cured the constantly in-
creasing calamities which affected the agricultural interest.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER admitted that
A revision of this'matter was desirable, but the ptesent pro-
position might be dangerous. It might be advisable to try
an experitu,•nt on a small scale,-such as taking I instead of 5
per cent: He agreed in 'the propriety of encouraging the
growth of our owli wool:
Mr. I). GIDDY supported the motion.
Sir H. PARNELL appioved of the objett fOle motion,
'but
recommended the Ail tOrawing it far the pr,sent.
Mr, J. P. GRANT and Mr. H. SUMNER Supported the
motion. • , .
Lord LASCELLES hoped that the • present proceedings,
even if the motion Were withdrawn, would serve as a notice
to wool-staplers and others that a metiAti-e. would he intro-
duced next session.
Mr. ROSE rectomnended the withdrawing of the Motion.
Mr. WESTERN was unwilling- to withdraw the motion,
but had no objection to modify it:
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that he
should not nbject if the Bill were limited only to the reduc-
tion of the duty for the present.. - •
This proposition was assented to, and the House resolved
itself into the Committee. The Report being be-ling-lit up,
leave was given to bring in a Bill to reduce the duty upon,_
Wool, the growth of the. United Kingdom.

- -
BEGGARS IN LONDON:
Mr. ROSE gave notice, that on Thursday he would move
fer a Committee tin the state of Nlemlicity in the Nletropolis.
His object Was only to Ening in the 13ilIYor eonsidcratiun.•

NEW TAXES.—SINKING FUND.
Mrt TIERNEY enquired whether ir was in the contempla-
tion et the Right Hon. Gentleman to propose any new mea-
sures of finance, in the. place st those taxes which had been
abandoned. The Stamp Duties had not yet been brought be-
fore Parliament, but _he under tood that there were altera-
tions, and that. their original amount was calculated at
800,0001. The Wine Tax was withdrawn, and be understood
that the Tobaceo and new Customs and Excise Duties were
estimated_ at 1,600,0001. Had the Right Hon. Gentleman no
farther ways and means of meeting the ditticuities of the pre-
sent crisis ?

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER; in a low tone
of voice, observed, that the Right Hon. Gentleman had ac-
curately stated the original estimated produce of the New
Taxes which bad not been abandoned. The Stamp Duties,
however, had been newly modified, and were now estimated
at 1,000,0001. For whatever deficiency might arise in the
Ways and Means already before Parliament, it was the in-
tention of his Majesty's Government to propose resorting to
the stock now in the hands s-i the public Counnisioners.
Mr. GRENFELL gave notice of a motion on the subject of
the public balances deposited in the -Bank of England.
DEBTS OF THE PRINCE REGENT.
-Mr. BENNET asked, whether the Noble Lord had any ob-
jection now to state the amount of the Debts of the Prince
Regent
Lord CASTLEREAGH said, that up to the 20th of May
there remained 339,0001. undischarged against
.his Royal
Highness.
Mr. TIE.RNEY asked whether it would not be infinitely
moie-to the credit of the country for the House to take the
whole subject into its own hands, instead of obliging the
Prince Regent• to resort, Session after Session, to Parlia-
ment ? It would be a great deal more fair and manly to give
the creditors some security, and to relieve his Royal High-
ue.iis from embarrassment.

After a few words from Mr. HoKurd, Mr. H. Addington
obtainaleare to bring in a Bill to amend the Laws relating
to Transportation.
. Mr.TIERNhY asked, When the Treaty with Holland would
be laid on the table ?
Lord CASTLEREAGH said--Tomorrow.
COTTON APPRENTICE BILL.
- -

Sir R.. PEELE, on rising to wove for leave to bring
in a Bill to amend the Act relative to the Apprentices
of Cotton Manufacturers, observed that his prin-
cipal object was to benefit the health of the children.
it had been the. custom to take children at a very early period
of life, before they were able to attend many bouts to any
sort of business without injury to their health. He would
propose to restrict the a4.e of children adulated to ten years ur
upwards, and to extend the benefit uf the Act to children
already apprenticed, as well as to those not yet bound. He
should also propose, that their daily time at lab Our shout,'
not exceed twelve hours and a halt in each day, inc!udia the
.time for refreshment and education, which would reduce the
actual time of their labour to ten hours and .a half. No

injury vviitil;la;lseto the masters from this regulation, as
the business was not a labour of 'hardship, hut a labour'of du-
ration, and-the length of time the children were employed in
most manufaCtories seriously injured their health. He had a
remarkable proof of the advantage of such a 'regulation in his
own establishment, where the average mortality did not ex-
ceed one in a hundred, which was considerably less than the
diminution of human life by any other employment. He
should also propose that the persons who teach the children
should be properly paid by order of the :11agistrates, and that
inspectors be appointed by them, to be also remunerated.—
As the Bill was of immense importance, he wished it to be
read a first time and printed, in order to be perfected next
Session, and he wished it -to be understood that' the Bill
would provide against its being legal for any young persons, to
be apprenticed after this notice. The Hon. Baronet then
made his motion.
Mr. W. Smith highly approved the Bill, hut wished it had
been introduced earlier, so as to be enacted this Session..
Mr. HORNER thought all such Bills as this were no bet-
ter than palliatives. The root of tliC evil was the removal
of parish children to distant manyiactories. This was an
outrage to humanity which the law should not permit.—
Such was the extent of abuse and atrocity to which this
treatment of. parish children was carried, that in the,
case of , a cotton-manufactufer, who some time since be-
came a bankrupt, whole gangs of children were advertised
and disposed of among his effects. In another case before
the King's Bench, some children of this description were
found in a state of famine, and saved from starving by the
humanity of some persons whose notice was attracted to them.
It appeared before a Committee up stairs, that a bargain wits
made between a London parish and a Lancashire manutac-.
turer for the removal of these unhappy children, one condi-
tion of which was, that with every tei sound children, he
should take one idea. He was ready to admit that-the abuse
was accidental, but the possibility of its existeace should be
prevented by Parliament.
Mr. PHILLIPS stated, that in consequence of recent alte-
. rations, the dumber of apprentices under ten years old was
greatly reduced,
.and that he found on inquiry the state of
health in the manufactories to be as good as in anv other suit
of employment. •
, Mr. H. SUMNER suggested a short Bill in chi present
Session, with a view to obtain full iuforMation before the
next Session.
• After a few words from Sir R. Peek, and Mr. Roses leave
was given.
Sir It. PEELE subsequently brought in the had it read
a first time, and ordered to be printed and read a second time
on that day se'nnight.
Mr. HORNER presented two Petitions from the Debtors
confined in the King's Bench and Marsholsea Prisoms,,against
the pending Insolvent Debtor's pill, which was ordered to lie
un the table.
Mr. GORDON asked, whether the Post Office Bill was to
be brought on that night, and at what trout.? • .!
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, he wish-
ed hest to dispose of the other orders, but that if they. took.
up the time till ten o'clock, it was his intention to postpone
the Post Office Bill.
EAST • INDIA SHIPPING BILL.
. .

The Order of the Day for a CouTnltee on the,
India Shipping VAL hav,ing been read,'
Alderman ATKINS rose td-oppose.the.Speaker's
leaving. the Chair. 1-le conceived, that the etTect

of this nig, would. 1e to transfer ship-bitiliting P
front the Kivet"rharnes to India. In such cage,
what were to become of the great establishments
on the Thames, aod of the thousands of ship-
wrights and arthatiS employed there I much the
greater proportion of the large ships, formerly
built in the River Thames, were intended to be
employed in the commerce of India bin if the
Company, besides their monopoly of the trade to
China, were permitted to carry on all that trade
in India-built ships, he conceived the business of
ship-building in the Thames, and the immense
establishments existing for that purpose, would -
be completely annihilated. Since the Company
bad begun to build ships in India, the number
built in the Thames .did not exceed two in a year)
. whereas it formerly amounted to seven. Inde-
pendent of ,the other advantages of the trade of
ship-building centering in this country, it should
be recollected that in very critical times, when
the Navies of France, Spain, and Holland were
coalesced against this country, no less than four-
teen large ludiamen, many of Which were brought
into the line, were transferred to the service, of
Government. This could never , hive taken place
if the docks for building those ships bad then
' been in India, instead of England. Incase of a
long peace following the present war, how .tvcre
the numbers of men now employed at the dock-
; yards to find work, if the commercial mat ine
should not be able to find employment for those
ho were no longer iiccessary to our military

?
Mr. WALLACE conceived that the obtect of this
8.11 had been very generally misunderstood. It
was rather extraordinary that the ship-builders,
in their petition against it, still stated the ill con-
sequences which would result front
ships being entitled to all the advantages of a
British register, when they had, by their depu-
ties, several conferences with Ministers upon the
subject, and could not avoid knowing, that one
of the objects of this Bill was to prevent the sale
of Such ships, or their being admitted in the- ge-
neral competition of trade. So tar front giving
India-built ships the full. tolvantage of a British
register, this was a restraining Bill, which did
not permit them to be employed in any other
trade but that of India, and from India to this
country. it had been said, that this would be a
breach of the spirit of the Navigation Act : that
Act, however, had been originally intended for
the encouragement of our commerce and_our sea-
Well,. much more than to encourage the trade of
althOugh this trade flourished, as
was naturally to be expected, in the general pros-
perity of our commerce. The Navigation Act
was, however, never at any time so construed as,
under the words British-built -ships, to exclude
the ships which were built in our Colonies. In-
deed, the very words of it mentioned the territo-
ries in possession of his Majesty. It was perfectly.
well known, that when. America was in the situa-
tion of a Colony, American-built ships were not
considered as. excluded by the Navigation Act
from the advantages given to British ships. He
• would now ask,' upon what Principle of justice
were the Americans, and every nation in amity
with us, to have the advantages in this trade,
which were to be-denied to British India ? With
respect to what had been said-'as to the state of
destitution of the yards, he was convinced that
it was not occasioned by the East India ship-
ping, but by the want of that employment which
Government had afforded them during the war,
and also by their own improvidence, in driving
away every species of shipping except the most
expensive. It was from that improvidence, there-
fore, that they now resisted the Bill, and sought
an indemnity at the expence of the East India
Company. The number of shipwrights was stat-
ed at about 4,000, but as they were chiefly em-
ployed in repairs, nearly tour-fifths of their trade
would remain, if they had neither the Gtivern-
ment; nor the East India Company ; and there-
fore, it could not be said that their. ruin would be
effected by the introduction of the Bill. The East
India Company had at ptesent 30 ships, which
must shortly be replaced in some way or other,
and no doubt could be entertained that a great
proportion of them would be built in this coun-
try. From many circumstances, indeed, they
could be built much cheaper here than in India.--
In some parts there was a difficulty in procuring
wood, and a sufficient number of shipwrights
could not be found ; and it was not to be supposed
that -a trade, which an Englishman was seven
years in learning, could be acquired by an Indian
in one year. It had been urged, that no advan-
tages would accrue to this country from building
ships in India ; -but the very reverse, was the
truth, as one third of .the materials must be- sent.
from England. In India, they had never been
able to make iron applicable to the purposes of
ship building : they had no copper at all ; 'and in
regard to cauvas,.Mr. Horner had said that he
would not suffer a ship to come. round the Cape
without English sails. In 1801, Lord Wellesley
bad expressed an. opinion, that we should derive
very considerable advantages from India built
shypiog, and it was perfectly clear, that if we
would avail ourselves of those advantages, we
a-sise),gic.rozionl:.‘telit,te(nlyb
in
notnor
oakbe wished
this t hcaotu there
should make this country the universal emporium
practical security owf4tsraadieu;
eivtivlehriticceh,v‘t.latsat-rnecotliosinte
t e
but
fourth t tpa4dr
%eve:
for the Navy atone. Besides, the price of oak
was four times as much- as it
was 20 years ago,
• notwithstanding the facility
Mr. ' M considered that India was ex-
empt from all the restrictions to whiCh the other
Colonies of England
were subjected. She bought
wherever she found it
cheapest,
and sold where-
' ever she could do it with most advantage. The
natives of India were unable
to support the ;hard-
ships of our northern climates, and therefore
-could_.be of no use to our navy. He thought that
those who were not subjected to colonial restric-
tions, should not be entitled to colonial
privi-
~-leges• He contended that the price of oak had
hardly doubled in 60 years. Ha smaller quantity
.1. .appeared. throughout the country than in former
times, the demand had also become less. Our
ancestors used oak in building their houses, and
lor.many other objects, in which a different kind
of wood was now employed. The quantity, though
I diminished, was therefore still sufficient for • ship-
building. Was tree, as had Inca said, that eren

should the measure -be carried, In 1 3
di, bad n 6 °Cant
of availing herself ()fit what7would be the.ti.eb:t
and should the
passing the 11;11 ?: B' 1 . 1 t India
• But tie thong )
the means,
b_ ee adopted, a-capital of twenty-two millions "a to
!? taken away from England and:Aransferre
_.
ourlndia.
seamen were Here, we must either bring-,,0r
shipssi. to our seamen, or send oar seamen tc'elici.,
:iia,td
°t
fld
dentsups. Would not this be increasing tbe tido.
which might happen to either, and leil'r! lea
Bering the existence of our navy ? Mr ' ""lon's
. tiv e Hastings
stlie
in India by a thread, which the breath- of PLi ,
Opinion might destroy. We had tang ht the
ottlict
us, that we held our posses 3 bo
'atigta
,
them how. to build navies.. He thong wer 0,...
not-to place. those means at the disposal„,l% Sole
sessions so distant and so precarious. 'SY into tile
sentiments he should vote against going at.-
b
Committee. , of ottr
Mi. Fri ‘vitr, and were now to itiStl .
-ED- DOUGLAS ritliCUlect the ioea ~ one
teaching other countries the art of shirt„l',(l ''''
which was no mystery, and defended the L'l'•be,
. Sir CHAs• MoNcit hoped, atter all the postrtio,
Coe:Lcrleuatsl co:11 reasons
iitillents that had taken place, and the eiden;eeniea-
.‘ d been produced, that the authors ot this .t......
sure would have been induced to wili“.ll.`°tliolo gt
the
then entered at length into a"
examitia,;,. atid
whichoi)i,olseitilighitittlietoctcliiicittitte.
it ituprop,... I ,
bad (titri4el
GliteNutquieNr:e supportedopposite rile
viende Is'
Attiee.'reiylStirliteidirt,
recourse hail been occasionally had (0 the ' bey
chant-yards in the river Thames, but not that
bte ,
ought to be always employed. it would ~,i
monstrous proposition to maintain that the..-...,
of England should depend ofd few arblill 1"
in the River. 05
Mr. MARRY Aar opposed the measur-e; he not
willing that timber should he_imported, bat
~..3
shil3s-41te material, but o.ot the mantitactto
article.
The House then divided, . .
1
For going into the_ Committee •..... • • • • • • • 5
Against it ...................... .•• • • 930
'Majority ...... • • .to
The House, - havina then fesolved itself in
„Jo.
z.,
Committee,
,the different Clauses went thrair.;,,t
and several new ones were .proposed and
afire
to. The Report was received, read, 011 d °°
for,farther consideration on Thursday.
The Chapel Exemption fill was
third reading to-morrow.—The other Orders %.,(;e0
then disposed of; and the House Adjool.lled at
O'CLO •
LC. ----- -,_ WO'
MINORITY, ON THE EAST INDIA SHIPPING
„, Os
[FROM A CORIIFSPON:PENd
The Ntanes of
--, the Mindrit ' t%oted bast xigla --4
y who
East Italia Shippigg Ma:
Mr. Marryatt Mr. Ege.rton Mr. Astell ,
. Lord Neicou
Mr. Sumner . _me. West.,,rn
Mr. Round Mr. R. Wigrain. Mr. MsYielik
General Doreton ime. c. Ellison . Mr. iNlitf.or_
Mr. D. -
Alt nport Mr. Crickett Mr. P. 63. ev.i
s. waits.
ordered farl:
Mr. Houblon Sr. G. Alien
Mr. Glenfell Mr. Calcraft
Me. Lyster Sir M. W. Ridley
Sir C..Monck, } Tellers.
Mr, Alderman Atkins
The following Members paired off:---
Sir M. B. Foulks with Mr. Porcber, •
Mr. Cawthorn.. with Mr. R. Abercrorribtp
'Dnnas cl'is"4l
Sir. R.Gordan .. with Sir
Sir T. Pechell.. with General Finch.

heldijllStototr. .i\;:".e"--tis--teo-rDT--------IGasyoz..,C,oitit'ott-tiTeer's9.l,4okqeao'ft ‘iiiis%,e.:::
before .
di_miler:ll,sat'int ial.ltiCes lalltenolts°lesealtlei ne°rlSlionittiltljleits•- b‘tl;3(ejiyectso,tlSY'lsgoarsi°nl:':rlittl:;:iii:e:
hol(l>ddorefatclfilial
bullock. running
yifini.ltliil.lllll:litillg, in consequence of ittlrd
SlUtatftii‘eitilisi)l.car:ttett°l)-,ilt :t.
thi`l'e(!ca(
dc twoe ce a
soe
(iii n
lc) eusd of
el ae int d ai :rm ; 0
..yl,:trel s7si'lactic:
,foarbtohye,laabstoisti:ll3llo:e:ss:::ool:
Charing on INionclay eveol 7reer,
accif(ilierniottiosicyciti.rr occurred
pi ntutilliseinneenith_nstf :
so closely pushed by tile anima A(I,
'hen the spikes entered
ir ity, his body,
he _w,as taken to St. Martin's workhouse.
red iu
°cello:1' rif,
to go over the railings at
',il
accidents has
North, by the firing or blasing -of k.' thec vbelo
cin'tnging to Messrs. Ncstiot an. Co. 10 i 000,...,
~_ll y of Newbattle, in the county ot 1)1"0,1 just.
I' is dreadful calatnity took phice oil the "._5.: 40
oftenof. upwards of
.70. persons lost their lilieo to
ittili_elie.:eain.iiLigtoitaneitititasipeicevla,itior.i
endeavoured
le:
Houghton-le-Spring unfortunate vittims were to be t'ttoidal
"llt"-le-Spring 1 .or interment o
butso at
last, and about 30 more were to be oc Oft
this3teeet and Fainshaw. The erraioct
r_, disastrous' event bad not been asc
tberc il
novne.ll the last accounts came awaY, buctfo it ilif.
doubt it was occasioned by means of i'liollY
Fur same time no i er on could be Otillt ocer'
enough . ..) 'r
to descend into tile pit, in order oou
tail) the state of thing b I v and to {lean ighr
5e o y WV "1 Of
to save
. any of the unfortunate persons ~bson, I
still remain-alive. •At length Thoinas il'", olteere`
the village of -Houghton-le-Spring, colt 05°
hise se", ices for this perilous andertalciago tiot II
xetten himself in the cause of holowait-Y were 501
actually got up six of the sufferers, ho. uitiopt°
alive, but with vtry small hopes of tb,r
recur , -
ol cry. Aff'
,clock' aria
.. On Friday night last, about ten o'c
_.,.t
.0
singlerOOE was returning to Brping title
sto?
himbeet
on the Leabridgeoad by thrCe .
cite), /le
but pushing his horse, which was veri srif isfot,
overthrew the luau who had placed'hinisibt
tit pot'
the animal, and by that zudatts escaßedi, at•Dill!'
until another Of the villains-fired a pist?Lie of IJ°
the ball of which perforated the left Y1`._,1.„.
without
great coat,
hilll further it ju j
, • . yo 06;
. MA RRIFP. . I.,tr, iv
Lately, at Bolton-le-Moors, Lancashire, Wil 1:_, ipit
Fsc • ' of Chadivi.cli 5/ '
' I. of Bolton 001 to ikdiss Singleton,
blesdale.
PIE 1). .. 00111°05PC:
n
..,n sat arday, the 3d inst. of ii-deciille, at bre' ‘OO,iOP
near Kilhnro, in the tAth year of legit,e, 1%1 .3. ' ' .or.
Wife of Dr. Mai:kin:ion, of John-str Adelpin. 0 0
On the inorniii,„.• of the 6th instant, at ;veslialui,6,'
aq.,
eestershire, Mrs: Nlaurice Lady of Capt. Matt lle'.
whoge amiable virtues and 'intelligent Wind ha
,
Hided and distress hushin' to devloie her Ivo. p4'
On the -260 tiltedarah, wife of ltobert Varniete •
Burgh-hall, Norfolk.