The Sun.
London, England, 1847-02-11 00:00:00

FOREIGN RAILWAYS.

Boulogne and Amiens :.---.:..lii::::L .. .. .•• . . • 14
Dutch Rhenish .. .. .. .. 7 .. • • 4' %.• •• • • 4%
Namur and Liege .. .. • • .. 8 .• .. 2% %..•• • • • • 2%
Northern of France .. .. .. 8 .... 12% IA .. ••.. • • 12
Orleans and Bourdeaux .. .. 6 .... 7 .. • • ...... 7

MINES.
Real del Monte, Unresristered —3% • • .• • • . • . • 3%

LLOYD'S SHIPPING.-(THIS DAY)
LONDON, FEn. 11.—Wind N.W., moderate breeze and fine.
DOVER, FEB. 10.—Wind N.W., strong.—Arrd. Union,
Saintball, Jamaica, for Bremen.

PORTSMOUTH, FEB. 10.—Wind N. to N.W.—Sld. Mary
Ann, Cape of Good Hope and Madras; Miranda, Antigua.
BRIFTOL, FEB. 10.—Wind N.—Arrd. Sybilla, Mauritius.
COWES' Fan. 10.—Wind N.N. W.—Arrd. Louisa Caesar,
Weneke, Rio Janeiro; St. Thomas's Packet, St. Domingo.
Livanroor.' FEB. 10.—Wind N., fresh —Arrd. Walpole,
Richardson, New York. Sld. Rimar, Valparaiso. The
Charles Brownell, for Valparaiso, and the Milton, for Bahia,
were in contact last evening in the river, and both received
some damage.

CLYDE, FEB 7.—Wind N.—Sld. James Ewing, Jamaica;
Agnes Sophia, Matanzas.
WATERFORD, FEB. B.—Wind N.E. to N.N.E.--Sld. Mar-
garet, New York.
CORK, FEB. B.—Wind N.N.W.—Arrd. Panama, Wilson,
Callao; Esk, Bahia. The Lovely Mary, Stanton, Waterford
to Newfoundland, has put in here with masts cut away, and
part of cargo thrown overboard in a hurricane, lat. 24,
long. 37.

CorooNnznztr.—Arrd. Canonicus, Copeland, New York.
Sld. Maria. New York.

LBITH, FEB. 9.—Wind N.W.—Arrd. Joanna, St. John's.
BRIDLINGTON, FEB. 10.—The Charles, Clay, from Boston
to Stockton, is on the south pier, and likely to be much
damaged.

MARKET NEWS.-(THIS DAY.)
NirCVGATE AND IMADZNIIALL

There was a very steady trade here, and prices were well
supported. Beef, 2s 8d to 3s 8d; Mutton, 3s 6d to 4s 4d •
Veal, 4s 2d to 5s 2d; and Pork, 3s 6d to 4s 10d per 811);
by the carcase.
_ MEAT =ARMLET S.

SOUTHALL, FEN. 10.—Prime Beasts and Sheep com-
manded a very steady inquiry, at full prices. In all other
kinds of stock next to nothing was doing. Beef,
from 38 to 4s 4d ; Mutton, 4s to os ; Veal, 4s to 4s 10d ;
and Pork, 4s to 4s 6d per 81bs., to sink the otfals.
RostFoßn, FED. 10.—We had an improved dmand for
each kind of stock at our quotations : Beef, from
3i to 4s 4d ; Mutton, 3s 10d to 5s ; Veal, 4s to 4s 8d ; and
Pork, 4s to .4s 6(1 per Sibs. Sucking Calves, 18s to 29s ;
quarter-old store Pigs, 16s to 18s ; and Milch Cows, with
their small Calf, 161 to 181 each.

- .
LEWES, FEB. 9.—Beef, from 3s 4d to to 4s Gd ; Mutton,
4s 2d to 5s 2d; Veal 45 2d to 4s 8d; and Pork, 4s to 4s Gd
per 811 n. A moderate supply, and a steady trade.

CORN AVERAGES.
GENERAL AVERAGE PRICES OF BRITISH CORN
For the Week ended Feb. 11, 1847, made up from the Returns of the
Inspectors in the different Cities and Towns in Exgland and Wales
per Imperial Quarter.
WHEAT. I BAXLEY] OATS. STE. I BEANS. I TEAR.
PRICE • . 73s 10d 53s id 33s Oct 55s 9d 545 3d 57s Eit

The Duties on Foreign Grain are now suspended.

HOUSE OF LORDS.-(THIS DAY.)
The House of Lords sat to-day to hear appeals.
WILSON V. WILSON.

The arguments in this part-heard appeal were resumed this
morning by Mr. TURNER, following on the same side as Sir
Fitzroy Kelly, who addressed their Lordships yesterday on
behalf of the appellants. The case came before their Lord-
ships upon an appeal against the decree of the Vice-Chan-
cellor of England, by which he had deserted specific per-
formance of certain articles of separation between these par-
ties. The bill filed by Mrs. Wilson stated that in the month
of April, 1839, a marriage was solemnised between the
plaintiff (then Mary Wright Wilson, spinster), and the de-
fendant, John Wright Hanniker Wilson (then John Wright
Hanniker); that previously to and at the time of such
marriage, the plaintiff was entitled under the will of Lady
Frances Wright Wilson, deceased, to a certain freehold
estate called Drayton Lodge, situate in the county of
Southampton, and Mat she was also entitled under the will
of Sir Henry Wright Wilson, deceased, for her life, with re-
mainder to her children and issue, to certain freehold estates
in the county of York, and a small estate in the county of
Essex, and to certain leasehold hereditaments situate in" the
parish of Chelsea, and called the Chelsea Park estate, and
also to a certain leasehold house in Grosvenor-place, and to
money in the public funds. That previously to such marriage
between the plaintiff and defendant a marriage settlement
was executed, dated 27th of April, 1839, whereby it was,l
amongst other things, recited that all the property of the
plaintiff, except the Drayton Lodge estate and the Chelsea Park
estate, and the sum of 3,0001. Consolidated Annuities, therein
mentioned, should aft( r the solemnisation of the said intended
marfage belong to Mr. Wilson, in his marital right. And
the Drayton Lodge estate and the 3,()001. were then settled
to the use of Mary H. W. Wilson for her life, and the Chelsea
Park estate was vested in trustees for the residue of several
terms of years therein subsisting, upon trust for John H.
W. Wilson, for his life, and after his decease to Mary W.
H. Wilson, for ber life, and after her decease, in trust, for
her husband, his heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns.
The bill then went on to allege that soon after the marriage
unhappy differences arose, and on the Bth of May, 1843, the
wife instituted proceedings in the Ecclesiastical Court for
a divorce, on the ground of impotency; that proposals
to prevent the continuance of this suit, and to ob-
tain an arrangement for a separation, had been at first
made by Mr. Wilson, but had been rejected by the lady,
Ultimately, however, certain articles of agreement, dated
June 2, 1843, were executed, by which it was covenanted
that Wilson should allow his wife to live separate from him,
that the estates in settlement should be vested in the trus-
tees of the settlement for her separate use during their
joint lives, and that if he should perform the covenants
therein contained he should be indemnified against the
covenants on certain leases on which he was liable, and also
against all his (this ought to have been her) present debts
and liabilitie., and that whilst he should duly perform the
covenants of this deed he should receive an annuity of
1,0001. during the joint lives of himself and wife, charged
upon the freehold estates in the county of York, and that
in the meantime proceedings in the Ecclesiastical Court
should be suspended. On the execution of these articles of
agreement all proceedings in that Court were stayed.
Mr. Wilson afterwards repudiated this deed of separa-
tion, and Mrs. Wilson and her trustees filed this bill
against him to compel specific performance of it. In
this bill, after the allegations above stated, they prayed
relief by a decree for specific performance of the deed of
separation, and offered to correct the error as to the debts,
and to execute any deed to indemnify Mr. Wilson against
the present and any future debts of his wife. Mr. Wilson
bT his answer alleged that the deeds had been obtained from
him by fraud and intimidation, and under the pressure of the
terror and degradation and ridicule, which the ground of
suit in the Ecclesiastical Court would bring upon him, by
which he bad been induced to give up the benefits he had
acquired under the marriage settlement, his wife, all the
while, knowing that the alleged ground of suit was false.
Mr. Wilson also filed a cross bill containing the same allega-
tions, and further insisting that the articles of separation
were contrary to public feeling, and praying that the deed of
separation might be given up to be cancelled. The two suits
came on to be heard before the Vice-Chancellor, who decreed
that Courts of Equity had power to enforce the deed of
separation, that in these articles there was nothing opposed
to public policy, and that there was a sufficient consideration
for the agreement, without a covenant to indemnify the
husband against the wife's debts. He therefore decreed spe-
cific performance by the husband of the deed of separation.
The address of Mr. TURNER, on behalf of the appellant,
to-day, occupied their Lordships the whole morning. The
case appears likely to take up two or three more days in
argument.