The Sun.
London, England, 1847-07-12 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
COURT OF QUEENS BENCH, July 10.
(Sittings at Nisi Prius, at Guildhall, before Lord DEN-
MAN and a Common Jury.)
CRIM CON.—WESTON V. BILL.
Mr. Dowdeswell and Mr. Cleasby were counsel for
the plaintiff; and Mr. Humfrey for the defendant.
This was an action for criminal conversation with the
plaintiff's wife. The damages were laid at 1,000 l
Mr. DOWDESWELL, in opening the case to the jury,
expressed his great regret that in the absence of Mr.
Martin it had fallen to his lot to state the case of the
plaintiff to them. The plaintiff was a person who, at the
time of contracting his marriage with his wife carried on
business as a butcher. The marriage had taken place about
four years ago ; he then gave up his business as a but-
cher, and took a public-house, called the Sun and Sports-
man, in Marylebone, which was exactly opposite some
extensive mews kept by the defendant, who had also a
house in the Regent's Park. He frequented the plain-
tiff's public-house, and a familiarity sprung up between
plaintiff's wife and the defendant. At first this was a
slight familiarity, but after wards it became stronger, and
the defendant had been seen sitting with his arm round
her waist. The plaintiff gave up the public-house and
went to reside in another place, but the intimacy was
continued, and the defendant was in the habit of going
to the house when the plaintiff was from home ; but the
defendant being a married man, and not very young,
the plaintiff did not think anything of it. In the begin-
ning of the present year it was arranged that the plain-
tiff and the defendant should go out together on the fast
day in a carriage, to shoot sparrows, but plaintiff was
obliged to go elsewhere in the morning, and defendant
was not to call for him till two or three o'clock. When,
however, the plaintiff returned home, he went to the
window of the parlour to call his wife, but upon looking
in, he saw the defendant and his (the plaintiff's) wife in
such a position as could leave no doubt in his mind of the
fact of criminal intercourse having taken place. While
the plaintiff was standing in a state of the greatest asto-
nishment and misery, the defendant came out, passed
the plaintiff, and jumped upon his horse, which was
waiting for him, and rode off'. They might easily con-
ceive the state of mind of the plaintiff. He left his house,
roamed about the streets all night, and the next
morning he went to the house of the mother of his wife,
and related to her what he had seen. The mother called
upon the defendant, who at first said there had only been
a slight difference between himself and the husband, but
eventually admitted the fact, and begged for pardon ;
but yet the defendant would now attempt to say that the
act had not been perpetrated. He called on the Satur-
day, and requested to see the plaintiff, and an interview
was arranged for the following Tuesday, at which the
mother of the plaintiff's wife was present, and on that
day the defendant expressed the greatest contrition for
what he had done, and offered to make any compensation
if the matter could be arranged. These were the facts
of the case. It was impossible the wife, who had one
little child, could ever again be the inmate of her hus-
band's house, and he now came to this court to ask for
compensation—a compensation which must always be
inadequate to the wrong done. He should call his wit-
nesses, and leave the case in their hands, and they would
say what damages the defendant should pay.
Mary Ann Charlton—l was present at the marriage
of the plaintiff and his wife in September, 1843. I have
visited them two or three times, and they appeared to
live on very affectionate terms.
Mr!. Smith—l am the mother of the plaintiff's wife.
The plaintiff was then a butcher. He afterwards sold
his business and took the Sun and Sportsman public •
house in Marylebone. Opposite to that were the defend-
ant's livery stables. My daughter then had one little
boy. I visited her, and she and her husband lived on
very affectionate terms. He was remarkably kind to
her. He sold that business in April last, and went to
live in Caledonia-road. He came to me on the fast day;
he was in a most distracted state of mind. I went to
the defendant's in consequence on the following day,
and saw him. I then asked him what was the matter
between him and Mr. Weston, and he said that he did
not know. I afterwards saw him again on a Satur-
day, and he begged pardon, and denied that any-
thing criminal occurred. He said lie was very sorry
for what had taken place, and begged to see Mr.
Weston. I afterwards saw Mr. Weston, and then Mr.
Hill, and I told the latter what the former had said. I
asked him if he was aware he had parted man and wife.
He said he would do anything, either in money or any-
thing else, if Mr. Weston would but forgive him. I
said, if I could get Mr. Weston to see him, I would send
and let him know. Mr. Weston consented to see him on
the following Tuesday, and it was arranged that I should
be present. We met on the Tuesday. Mr. Hill was in
great agitation. Mr. Hill asked what had taken place.
Mr. Weston asked him if he did not see him in a certain
position, and Mr. Hill admitted that it was not a false-
hood, and begged Mr. Weston to forgive him. Mr.
Weston said, how can I forgive you when you have
ruined me and my family for life ? Mr. Hill begged me
to have another interview with Mr. Weston, but Mr.
Weston refused. I had seen Mr. Hill at Mr. Weston's
before this ; they were on very intimate terms.
Cross-examined—When Mr. Hill came to the house a
person was placed to hear all that took place. I ad-
vised that. He was in an adjoining room, with the
door open; his name is Summers. At the interview,
Mr. Hill said the fact of criminal intercourse had not
taken place. My daughter now lives with me. I can't
tell how often the plaintiff comes to my house; he calls
to see the child, sometimes twice a week. Mr. Williams
succeeded Mr. Weston at the public-house. The plain-
tiff's wife has gone there to collect the debts, and what
money she collects she keeps. It is not requisite I
should tell you how much she has got. I never inquire
into other people's business. She sends her brother
Joseph. I have three sons. Mr. Hill is younger than
Mr. Weston; I believe him to be about thirty-five; my
daughter is twenty-three.
Charles Summers—l am a tobacconist. I called upon
the plaintiff on Tuesday, the 20th of March. I was
asked to remain. I went into the next room to that in
which the plaintiff and Mrs. Smith and Mr. Hill were.
Mr. Hill said he was come to apologise for what had
taken place. so help him God it had not taken place.
Mr. Weston said it would have taken place, if it had not.
Mr. Hill said, " My dear soul, it would have taken place,
I have no doubt; but it did not." Mr. Weston said,
you have been there when I have not been at home.
Mr. Hill said, yes, he had ; he did not deny it. I had
never seen anything wrong between Mrs. Weston and
Mr. Hill when I called at the public-house.
Sarrah Watson—l was in the service of the plaintiff
at the public house on the 3d of May last year. Mr.
and Mrs. Weston lived on very good terms. Mr. Hill
nsed to come very often. I saw nothing particular. I
have heard him call her my dear. She has said, " Mr.
Hill, I'm not your dear."
Cross•examined—There was a barmaid in the room
at the time.
Mary Willis—l also lived servant in the public-house.
The plaintiff appeared affectionate to his wife. Mr.
Hill came there frequently. I once saw his arm round
Mrs. Weston's waist. I have seen them meet on the
stairs ; he has gone up stairs to the billiard-room, and
Mrs. Weston has gone up stairs.
Cross-examined—Mr. Hill used to take Mr. Weston
out for a drive.
James Smith—l recollect Mr. Hill coming to Mr.
Weston's on the fast day, on horseback ; Mr. Weston
was out. I took care of the horse ; be remained for
two hours.
Cross•exemined—l am living with my mother now.
I have been to collect the debts at the public house by
the desire of Mrs. 'Weston. I have given the money
to her.
Hester Macey—l live with the defendant, in the Re-
gent's Park. On the day before the fast day an arrange-
ment was made between the plaintiff and defendant to meet
the neat day at Red Hill, near Edgeware, to shoot spar-
rows, and the ladies were to go in the evening. The
defendant was to call for the plaintiff.
Joseph Tewsbury—l lived with the defendant ; he
kept livery stables opposite the Sun and Sportsman.
Mr. HumrnEv then addressed the jury for the de-
fendant. It had never been his fortune to see such a
case brought before a jury. His friend had used common-
place phrases, which would do for many cases, but here
they were a little out of place. His friend had said that
the little familiarities which went on were not noticed
on account of Mr. Hill being an old man, and Mrs.
Weston a young woman ; he did not know what Mr.
Weston would think of that, but Mr. Hill, in-
stead of being this old gentleman, was about two
years younger than Mr. Weston himself. He had never
heard a case so attempted to be got up ; but he must
say that this husband had presented himself with as
little pretence of being injured and heartbroken as any
man he had ever known. This had taken place on the
fast day (Wednesday), and the writ had been issued on
the Friday. The attorney said, " Oh, I will issue the
writ; I shall get 2L 3s. 4d. for that; but then what is
your case?" Mr. Weston would then look a little blank.
The attorney would say, you must have some evidence
upon which, by the advice of the attorney, the heart-
broken husband arranges with his mother-in-law that a
conversation should be got up, so that some person
might hear what was said, because if they could
manage a little admission that would tell before
the jury. The interview of Tuesday was to
take place, and he had no doubt Mr. Weston had
gone off to the attorney, and said we have made a
good shot, much more effectual than shooting sparrows.
We have knocked down the bird, for Hill has
agreed to meet us. Then the attorney would say the
admission is not so good if proved by ono witness, and
therefore if you could just quietly get some one in the
next room to hear what is said it would then be a double-
barrelled gun ; put Mrs. Smith in one barrel and Mr.
Summers in the other, and then we shall be sure to have
him. It was discreditable to get up a case of this sort
by conversation, and his friend had said, could this hus•
band ever again live with his wife ; but let them conceive
him sitting in the room at that interview for a quarter
of an hour, while the worthy tobacconist was listening in
the other room. The defendant had said that nothing
criminal had taken place, and then the husband (no
doubt on the suggestion of the attorney) said it it had
not, don't you think it would? He had never seen a case
in which there was such evidence to lead a jury to the
conclusion of guilt. He submitted that the proof was
not sufficient to induce them to find a verdict for the
plaintiff.
Lord DENMAN, in summing up, said it was a question
of facts for the jury. A great deal depended upon the
evidence of Mrs. Smith. Surely the feelings of the
mother of the wife who had committed such an act
were to be spared in some degree by all parties in the
evidence she had to give. Let them consider what her
feelings must have been during that conversation, and
what her feelings must be when in a public court of jus-
tice she came to state the guilt of her child. Were they
or not satisfied that this had taken place ? He thought
it a most serious case. If these parties were adulterers,
he thought the defendant had much aggravated the case
by bringing it into a public court, by not suffering judg-
ment by default, by exposing parties who were witnesses
with foolish persons sitting by ready to grin in their
faser at any indecency that might arise. If they con-
fide ed the defendant guilty, then the question was,

what damages they would give against a man who had
been guilty of this crime.
The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages
2501.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER, July 10.
(Sittings as Nisi Prius at Guildhall before the LORD
CHIEF BARON and Special Juries.)
WALLER V. BISHOP.
The Attorney-General, Mr. Martin, and Mr. Cleasley
conducted the case for the plaintiff, and Mr. Crowder,
Mr. W. H. Watson, and Mr. Ogle appeared for the de-
fendant.
This was an action to recover a sum of money alleged
to be owing by the defendant, in his character of a
member of the committee of the Dutch Hanoverian
Railway Company, to the plaintiff, a stock-broker fur the
purchase of shares and " continuations" for and on ac-
count of the company. It appeared that some time after
this company had been brought out, the plaintiff re-
ceived instructions from the board to purchase up
the shares as they came into the market, with
a view of maintaining their value. For a length
of time these purchases were effected, and the
purchase notes made out " bought for account of N.
Ogle, Esq.," and although a letter was put in evidence,
which purported to be an authority from the company,
and wherein there was a recognition of the correctness
of the plaintiff's account, it was contended on the part
of the defendant that he had not only not signed the
paper, but that he had said he would not sign it for a
thousand pounds.
The case occupied the whole of the day, and the only
questions between the parties were, whether these pur-
chases had been made by the plaintiff on account of the
company, or on the private account of the director of
the name of Ogle.
The jury retired at twenty minutes past five o'clock,
and at five minutes to seven sent a note into court pray-
ing that they might be discharged, as there was not the
least chance of their agreeing to a unanimous verdict.
The Lord Chief Baron having left the Court,
Mr. Baines, from the Marshall's office read the note,
and asked the attorneys on both sides if they would con-
sent to the discharge of the jury?
The Attorney for the plaintiff said he could not give
his consent.
Mr. Baines thereupon communicated that fact to the

jury.
About eight o'clock the jury again sent out to ask
whether they mighl not be discharged, as the probabi-
lity of their agreeing was more distant than ever.
Mr. Baines returned an answer in the negative, as the
parties would not give their consent.
Shortly afterwards, however, Mr. Baines sent a mes-
senger to the house of the Lord Chief Baron in Queen-
square, communicating the request of the jury, and
asking for instructions.
At nine o'cl,,ek, belore the messenger had returned,
the jury came into Court, and delivered a verdict for the
plaintiff—Damages 3,9291. 17s. 3d.

ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE.
OXFORD ClRCUlT.—Abingdon, July 10.
CIVIL SlDE.—(Before Mr. Justice COLERIDGE and
a Special Jury.)
SMITII V. SCOTT AND OTHERS.
Mr. Whateley and Mr. Phipson appeared for the
plaintiff ; Mr. Godson and Mr, Maynard for the de-
fendant.
This was an action against the prooprietors of the
Morning Advertiser newspaper, for a libel contained in a
report of proceedings at the Judges' chambers, before
Mr. Justice Erie and Mr. Justice Cress well respectively,
on application by the plaintiff to get released from cus-
tody by virtue of his discharge and certificate under the
bankruptcy laws. The defendants pleaded only " Not
Guilty," and the principal question in the cause was,
whether the report was not a fair and correct account of

what took place.
It appeared that the plaintiff was formerly a barrister
on the South Wales circuit; that he, about the year
1836, originated some waterworks in Glamorganshire,
and subsequently started the Swansea Journal, and/
afterwards, having become involved to the extent of
upwards of 20,0001., had a fiat in bankruptcy struck
against him in the Bristol District Court, passed his
examinations, and was discharged and granted a
certificate by the commissioner. Being afterwards
taken into custody by some of his creditors, who had
not proved at Bristol, he applied at the Judges' cham-
bers in London for his release by virtue of his certi-
ficate—first to Mr. Justice Erle, and subsequently to Mr.
Justice Cresswell. These applications were resisted.
on the ground that he had lost more than 201. in one
day by gaming since he had become a trader, this alle-
gation, of course, being supported by a sufficient number
of affidavits ; and on this ground, under a provision of
the bankrupt laws, that where a trader shall have lost
more than 201. in one day, or 2001. in one year, by
gaming, his certificate shall not be a protection to him,
the plaintiff's applications were refused, and he was re-
mitted to custody. All these facts the report in question
set forth, and so far the plaintiff did not complain ; but
the reporter, under a misapprehension as to the state of
the law with regard to what a bankrupt should swear
before getting his certificate, added that the plaintiff in
his examination at Bristol denied that he had ever lost
more than 201. in one day by gambling ; and, further,
in his statement of the argument of Mr. Thomas Chitty,
the well-known special pleader, in opposing the plaintiff's
application, described that gentleman as contending that
the plaintiff had obtained his release by misrepresenta-
tion, whereas, in fact, the plaintiff had no occasion to
make such a denial in his examination at Bristol, and
Mr. Chitty had confined himself to urging that the loss
of more than 201. by gambling in one day made the
certificate void, and did not at all allude to the examina-
tion at Bristol. The plaintiff's counsel, in stating the
case, expressed his readiness to take a verdict for
such damages as would carry costs, if the defendants
would even now consent to apologise, and state that
they were in error in representing the plaintiff to have
denied that he ever lost more than 201. by gambling in
one day ; but this the defendants' counsel declined to do,
saying that the report was a correct one, and therefore
the defendants should not be punished in costs for its
publication.
On the part of the plaintiff it was admitted that he
had gambled largely before he became a trader, and the
gravamen of the libel was that he should have been re-
presented as having denied that he ever gambled, whereas
what he denied (not at Bristol but at the Judges' cham-
bers) was, that he gambled since he had become a trader.
It appeared that by the bankruptcy laws the plaintiff
should have made an oath that he obtained his certificate
by fair means, and that the certificate should set forth
that he had conformed, in all respects, to the bankrupt
laws; but the form of each oath was so vaguely framed,
that on a careless reading of it the deponent would seem
to swear that he had conformed in all respects to those
laws, whereas, he merely swore that he by fair means
obtained a certificate that he had conformed in all re-
spects to those laws; indeed, so apt was the frame of the
oath to lead an unlearned layman to the former conclu-
sion, that a quarter of an hour was consumed to day by
the Learned Counsel on both sides, and the Court, be-
fore the counsel for the defendant appeared satisfied
with, or rather ceased to contend against, the version
which we, in accordance with the decision of the Court,
have given as the orthodox one. It appeared in the
course of the case that the defendant's liabilities were
between 25,000/. and 26,0001., and that there were no
assets in hand.
Mr. GODSON addressed the jury on behalf of the de-
fendants, contending that the report was a fair and cor-
rect one; that when a reporter was compressing into a
reasonably readable compass the substance of what
occupied for several days the attention of judges at
chambers, where no regular course of proceedings was
pursued, but every one interrupted ever) body else, and
all was scrambling and confusion, no other errors could
be sought to be established against him—that from
the nature of the discussions which were proved to have
taken place, the very statements repotted in the de-
fendants' paper must have been made on the part of
those who opposed the plaintiff's application for his dis-
charge; and that even if an error had been accidentally
committed, the plaintiff was not a character who could
possibly be entitled to more than half a farthing da-
mages.
His LORDSHIP, in summing up, told the jury thatt iff
they thought the report in quusetiseteionthaechorthee;
shouldaccoun find
proceedings in a court of ,
t'o r op
the defendants; endan
correct,ts yetbu if
was it they
a fair,
awi
re,r o
Lone
7f;
fidei in that,
though opinion tat
not
well-
intentioned statement of what occurred, they should give
the defendants the benefit of this impression, by limiting
the amount of the damages to w hich they should think
the plaintiff entitled.
The jury, after a few minutes' consideration, gave a
verdict for 40s. damages; and an observation having been
subsequently made at the bar as to costs, it being for a
moment doubted by somebody whether an action for
libel was not within the jurisdiction of the county courts,
the jury said that they intended to secure the plaintiff
his costs.

said that Mr. Daniell had not arrived. I opened tht,
premises, and, as the shop was dark, directed that the
shutters should be removed. I then perceived that a
number of articles had disappeared, and the tickets which
had belonged to them were scattered about the place
and I said to the lad, " I see how it is." I then brought
in some gentlemen. (Here Haydon, the officer, produced
several bundles containing jewellery of various kinds.)
I can identify the gold watch found by one of the officers
upon Daniell as our property, and part of that whicia hot
been on the premises on Saturday, and had not been ae"
counted for by Daniell.
Mr. John Walker, of the firm of Brown and Walker,
saio—l went on Monday morning to our house
iu
Leadeuhall-street, and found everything there in
state of confusion, and the property stolen, and the
tickets about the premises. I instantly commenced
course of search, accompanied by Haydon and Webb,
the officers. I went with them for the purpose of identi-
fying Daniell. After having gone to a variety of places,
we at last called at No. 21, Green-place, Lisson-groves
where the officers knocked at the door, and inquirea
whether Mr. Johnson was at home. "Yes," said the
person who opened the door, " walk in." Upon enter-
in, we saw the female prisoner, and asked her whether
Mr." Johnson was at home? She replied in the negative.
I said, upon looking at her, "Your name is Daniellr
" No," said she, "it is Johnson, and Mr. John'
son is out." I at once recognised a particular book
which was on the table as Daniell's, and I said, " That's,
his book," and one of the officers said " That's his hats',
We then searched the next room, and Webb discovered
Daniell under the bed, and pulled him out. I said to,
y
Danill, " You scoundrel, where is my propert
he rep plied, " I see its no use—it's in that box," pointing
to a heavy trunk. The trunk was then opened, and We
found almost all the property which had been stolen
a carpet bag in it, done up in fourteen parcels, and We
took an inventory of the property. Daniell made 0°
statement, but the female prisoner inquired of him wilt
it was he said, to which he replied that he would tell her
presently. The whole of the property produced is (AO'
The female prisoner—Mr. Walker said at the time he
did not " charge" me.
Mr. Walker—Yes, but afterwards I found that yoU
had a black brooch and ring of mine.
Robinson Webb (658) City policeman, and Daniel
Hayden, who had traced the prisoners and the proper
from place to place, with extraordinary skill, gave er'i:
dence in all the main points exactly corresponding °DA'
that given by Mr. Walker. When Daniell acknowledge,
that there was no use in further attempts at concesy
went, he handed to one of the officers a key, which 111
singled out as the key with which to open the trunk, an
also the keys adapted to the lock of the carpet bag
which the property was contained. Each lock was al'
once opened with the key selected. In Daniell's pockets
were found not only the gold watch identified by Air'
Brown, but several foreign coins.
Mr. Walker said he hod no doubt that the coins were
the property of the firm, as Daniell was entrusted t°
purchase old gold and silver.
When the officers told Daniell what they were, aO, a
asked him whether he knew where they came frOlt, P°
nodded assent, and when asked whether ho wishedt°
say anything before the house was searched for the pr ll
perty, he said, " Well, it's all over, it's no use, yob,
find it all there," pointing to the trunk. When t
officers told the woman that she must consider berth
their prisoner, she replied, " Yes, 1 have no other W"
but to share his punishment."
The prisoners were then remanded.
A great deal of ingenuity, it appears, had been e%et;
cised by the prisoners to escape detection, but it 10%1.
a few days overcome by the indefatigable zeal and VW.
lance of the policemen.
MARLBOROUGH-STREET.
ASSAULT ON A MAGISTRATE.—Benjamin Black WI:
was brought before Mr. Bingham, charged with halh3°
assauhed Mr. Manning, a magistrate of Wolverhal
ton, at present staying at the Berners Hotel, Olfevr,
street. It appeared that on the previous erening
Manning was in Oxford-street, near the Prince to
Theatre, about nine o'clock, when he asked a person
direct him to a watering-screen. One person pointed oat'
a yard close by, in which was a stable. Complairie,,,r
went into the stable, and, seeing a man there, asked:l",
and obtained accommodation. When about leitll/11
defendant came up to him, seized him by the collar, aro
struck him a violent blow on the chest, dragged hi
out of the place, and threw him into the street. he
The defendant denied that he was the person°its
had assaulted the complainant, and called some
nesses to prove that it was another man who had not
treated complainant; but Mr. Bingham said he diu.,,es
believe the defendant's denial, or the evidence of his ",ig.
nesses. Complainant had acted most properly in I„ea-et
ing the privacy he had done, and, therefore, he °740
not to have been subjected to such violence. Defeo
was fined forty shillings, which he paid.
DUTH WA RK. ,rho
EXTENSIVE ROBB OF RAILWAY IRON.--"i
J
Malsey and Robert Howe, the former manager, s-re
the latter clerk, to an iron merchant at Bankside, °heat
charged, before Mr. Seeker, with assaulting 11°.,`"re-
Blandford, Police sergeant, 19 M. It app pot
that a few weeks back the sergeant discovered 44,
worth of new iron rails in the yard of the defendt%o
employer. That circumstance led to the appreheristho
of a man named Haynes, who had sold a great por
of the iron, which was believed to belong to the 5°,125,4
Western Railway, a great quantity having been ralsoes
from its junction with the Richmond line, and I.lo:the
was committed for trial at the Surrey Sessions.
trial the witnesses were unable to swear that the 1 ,c 1
was the same that Haynes had brought to the Yard' lithe
he was acquitted. Application was then made to 0
Bench by the railway company for the iron to be gifeepc
up to them, but the Bench refused to make any or
until better proof of its being their property was giveefl.
The company being positive of the tact, directed Blac/
ford to keep a watch on it, which he did. On the pre;
vious night he saw about thirty labourers remoringiljlo
iron in a truck from the yard, and on stopping there
was knocked down, and the Wheels of the truck Ivebe
over his legs. Yestsreley morning at nine o'clocih the
went to the yard with Mr. Rayland, chief clerk Comore
solicitors of the GI eat Northern Railway, and Air' ore
ray, a wharfinger at Battle-bridge, when the rails oar
identified as their property, and not that of the °:), tee
Western Company. Defendants were in the yard 504
time, and resisted the officer in his duty, for which
were taken into custody. 5 eric°
Mr. SECKER said it was a case in which $ , ve it
robbery had been committed, and with a view to it for
fully investigated he should commit the prisoner'
trial.

he
THE ATRAFILATORY7 OR LIQUID HAIR A., tley
only dye that really answers for all colours, and a„vyto
require re-doing but as the hair grows, as it never II to
acquires that unnatural red or purple tint coniniolldeodk
other dyes. Ross and Sons can, with the greatest Co estr
recommend the above dye as infallible, if done at 061;o ref,
blishment ; and ladies and gentlemen requiring it, bei.';
quested to bring a friend or servant with them to see.withell.i
is used, which will enable them to do it afterwards
the chance of failure. Several private apartments
entirely to the above purpose, and some of their es"; 8001
ment having used it, the effect produced can be at °llc f tirt°
They. think it necessary to add, that by attending soe
ti
the instructions given with each bottle of dye,n, Ott
persons have succeeded equally well without coming wt,
Address Ross and Sons, 119, and 120, Bishopsgate-stVOir
celebrated Perruquiers, Perfumers, Hair-cutters, an
Or
dyers. inf
ROBBERY OF 650/.—On Saturday evening office,
illation was received at the Metropolitan peliee,,4
Great Scotland-yard, that Wm. R. Rinzy bad 056501,10
from Monaghan, stealing and taking with him eir'a3
provincial notes, which he changed in Dublin, rr
amongst other moneys the following Bank O Ditss9,
notes and post bills, viz., note for 100/., N°- dated
dated June 5, 1847 ; ditto 1991., No. 26,6999 i 0. it
June 5, 1847 ; ditto 501, No. 99,389, dated dit 349 t
1847 ; Bank of England post bill for 50/., No- S" dated
favour John 'rrenlow • ditto for 301., No. 47',t r 4u"
June 11, 1847, favour John Trenlow ; and ditto te-criir
No. S., 9,555, dated June 2, Liverpool. His de feet
Lion is as follows :—Age about fifty years, fileemoti
eight inches in height, face round, but flattish in Tof 0
features small, nose rather hooked, eyes small, all'o•
blueish grey cast, hair thin and grey, sallow' C.,0
plexion, voice hoarse and squeaking, but delivery 4710
and concise ; usually wore a grey truck-coat, and vlLes
with a stick. It is supposed he has assumed the DP-ro.
of Davis, and is about to proceed to America. '
ward of 501. has been offered for his apprehension.
FADVERTISEMENT.] —HOW TO OBTAIN HEALTH Wit'aii
LosT.—The wonderful regenerating effects that Holloway's .70
produce upon the whole system is truly surprising. This astollio4
medicine perfectly identifies and assimilates itself with the„
„ 00
and other fluids, while it removes from them all impurities. AOO.
upon the stomach, the liver, the beast, the lungs, and the icti SO
and in its course so surely cleanses and invigorates those orr:011
to make the return of health the Immediate consequence 0 ;opt
doses of this wonder-working remedy. Persons of weak all:pr
litated constitutions are sure to regain their health and v_itoel
their use, when every other means have failed.—Seld ant, 24
eine venders ; likewise at Professor Holloway's establistiroy'
Strand, London.

FA/4
BIRTHS.
On the 15th of April, at Valparaiso, the lady off'. .14'.
of
Esq., of a daughter.
lAd
On the Ist inst., at Longnor Hall, Shropshire, tha
Edward Corbett, Esq., of a daughter. Lee.flig
On the 4th inst., at the New Proprietary Som--"
dati ,f
Blackheath, the wife of the Rev. H. Dale, of a gbe
On the sth inst., in the Close, Exeter, the lady
Chancellor Martin, of twins, a son and daughter, t WV-
of which survived only a short time. a. to
On the 6th inst., at Harrowden Cottage, Wellogb°
the wife of Henry Watson,Esq., -
n
On the 7th inst., at Tunbridge-wells,
Mrs. George COr
010
bell, of a son. n are,
On the 7th inst., Mrs. H. Home, of Montagu-S"P
son

01
MARRI if Pillle
On the 6th inst., at Edinburgh, John Blurra,/,'„r of
•
Albemarle-street, London, to Marion, third daughter
Alexander Smith, Esq., of Edinburgh. T h 0.4
On the Bth inst., at St. John's, Hackney, Mr. v?-..,13 ,bter °
Cummins, of Cambridge-heath, to Anna, eldest. a11"_,,,,..
W. S. Keneall, Esq., of Hackney.

DIED. ~ tteet'
On the Gth inst., Mrs. Ann Furnis 3, Carow--,-5
Pimlico. li ;013°
On the 6th inst., at Belvoir Cottage, Uckfield) —r.
N theewn On
8, ed 49. of tile
doil
tagh inst., at Camden-town, Elizabeth, wi
late Richard Burney, Esq., of l'ortsm th o°ll
"
On the Bth inst., I'. T. Esq.,Torkington,.°
solicitor,
h relict
Bridge-street, Blacktriars.
On the Bth inst., at Senbons-buildings, Susannah'
t•
William. Smart, Esq., aged 80. t• 0 ea
On the 30th ult., at Biebrich, Lucy, the wife of 141°
the Wife
Colonel Jasper Hall. th,
On the 6th inst., at Mitcham, Surrey, Elizabe
of Mr. Henry Hart, aged 65. ll'
sclil°
p• J
On the 7th inst., Anne Eliza, daughter of gr. .
Jobßelitha-villas, Islington.
On the 7th inst., at Beaumont. close, Bigglssif 111'4
Foster, Esq., aged 83

Lon.:on : Printed and Publisbc,i by UMW° youbro..t-e vl2,
tt
nil and, Prin,r, at ('lie Sun (..tice. Nn. 11e, Strand, in
of the Savoy, in the Coauty 01 hilddlesel,