The Sun.
London, England, 1823-06-19 00:00:00

EMPLOYMENT OF_TIIE POOR IN IRELAND-

Mr. OW.EN'S PLAN.
Mr. S. RICE presented a Petition from the Hibernian 'Phi.
lane Topic Society, praying that the House would take into
cOnsidtration Mr. Owen's plan fur the employment of the poor,
frith the view of ascertaining how far it could be applied to the
einploYment of the poor in Ireland. The Petition was from a
very inspectable body, and as such merited the attention of the
Utlase. Upon the merits of the particular plan recommended
by. Mr. Owen, he would offer no opinion ; but that some plan
which could give employment to the poor in that country was
Much.called for, there could be no doubt. • To those who would
study the peace of that country, such an object must be of vast
importance. He would take this opportunity of asking the
Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Goulburn) whether he would ob.
jest to the appointment of a Committee in, this or early in the
next Session, for the purpose of inquiring into the best means
of employing the poor in Ireland ?
Mr. GOULBURN said, he could have no objection to the
appointment of the Committee. On the contrary, he would
give such a measure his hest support; but he feared that if the
Committee were to employ themselves in considering the yrac.
ticability of Mr. Owen's plan, however benevolent
Lion of that gentleman might be, they would iind their time not
vay well bestowed. At the same time be trusted they might
be able to devise some measure which could be carried into
effect.

After a few words from Sir 0. Norr. and Mr. Clna•rTAN,
which were not heard in the gallery, the petition was ordered
to be printed.
STATE OF IRELAND.
Mr. GRATTAN wished to know whether it was the inten.
tion of Ministers to present any additional pipers on the state
of inland. Those already before the Douse were very imper.
feet, and confined to q small part of Ireland.
Mr. PEEI4 said there were other papers in the possession of
Government: they related to details of particular outrages : it
was not in the contemplation of Government to lay them before
the House.

OLIVE, STYLING HERSELF PRINCESS OF CUM.

BE R LAND.

Sir G. NOEL rose for the purpose of moving that the Peti-
tion which he bud some time ago presented from the L.tdy
calling herself Olive, Princess of Cumberland, should ba re-
ferred to a Select Committee. About three years ago, this
Lady made an application to the Crown for the payment of a
sum of money, which she assumed to be due to her under the
will of his late Majesty. He was afraid he should find it diffi-
cult to make himself understood. Though an old Member of
Parliament, he was not an old Speaker. He was not one of
e.sose who could make a bad cause good by his eloquence.
But he believed that this was a gond cause. Whether good
or not, however, he had undertaken if, and would go through
withit. He had always believed that every Member of the
Royal Family was on the Civil List; and that it was not
In the power of a Minister to say that a Member of the
itoyel I.amily should have nothing to live upon. But here
was a Member of the Royal Family who had nothing to live
upon. Ilow was this matter to be settled ? He had always
understood,, hat by the British Constitution there could be
no wrong without a remedy. But here was a lady sabring a
great wrong, for which she had hitherto no remedy. It was
said she was an impostor.-:-if so, it was the business of Minis-
ters to protect the Royal Family from her by the exposure of
her imposture. But the strangeness of the thing was, that
the papers she had offered for the consideration of Government
had been neither altogether rejected nor altogether accepted.
He would not enter into any .detail of the case, not because be
was unprepared to do so, but because be had it in command
from the Royal Person in question to say nothing that could be
considered offensive. lie had it also in command, however,
if no good answer were made to him, to say tweaking that
would he very strong; both to the Ministers and to the coun-
try. He should not be at all afraid to do so—fear formed
no part of his composition. The lady should not lose her
right if he could help it. At the same time, if it were once
proved that she had no right, he would immediately give the
matter up. No person who treated such a subject with levity
ought to sit and vote in that House. To give judgment against
any person, without knowing why, would be still further to
prove the necessity of the Parliamentary Reform sought by the
people. He was one of the People, and if in the event of a
.Reform he were not to come into Parliament, he should be
very much surprised. But while lie was for Reform, he was by
no means for Revolution. " Pitt and the Constitution" had
always been and would still continue to be his watchword. But
he must say that great blame was attributable to those who had
neglected this question. He was desirous and determined to
rectify the matter, " lf," continued the Honourable Baronet,
feennet find the means of doing it here, I will find them
somewhere else—Fleciere ri trequeo Superos, ileherontts inro-
vebo".,.( Loud laughter.)
On the motion of Sir G. Noti., the Clerk read the petition
which the Hon. Bart. presented on a former occasion.
SirO. NOEL then observed, that perhaps it might be unfit
for him to enforce the quetion, if any disposition existed on the
pelt of Ministers to grant the Select Committee, lie was ac-
tuated by the most sincere desire not to do any thing personally
offensive to the Royal Family; There was not a man in the
whole nation more attached to the Royal Family than himself.
Ile had worn the king's button these thirty years. He had
been very intimate with his :Majesty. He would put it to his,
Majesty whether, when he visited Ittulandshire, he found any
part of the popufation more loyal and attached to hie person
than his (Sir G. NoePio tenantry Under these circumstances
he felt rather embarrassed as to urging this claim to the highest,
point of success. But he thought that Ministers were 'bound
either to allow the claim of the Petitioner, or to prove her, an
impostor. What he wanted to escape from, however,. was,
being offensive in a quarter to which he was commanded to
spew respect. Ile would therefore conclude by moving, anti
he trusted 801110 Hommourrible Member would second the Ina-
tion that the Petition be referred to a Select Committee to take

•
Mr. HUME seconded the motion with great plessure,nat
be:ause he had any aceuaintanee with the. Petitioner, hut Ws'
cause, after what had publiely occurred on the subject, it ap-
peared to him that. her claims had become a serious question
which ought to be settled. The Petitioner elaitnediolleos
branch of. to Royal Family ; he could not say whether shkwas
so or not-_ but this he would say, that, if it were not truelili-
nisters ought to defend the Royal Family from the :calurrsiay,.
and prevent the individual in question from spreattingsfalite.
reports in the newsp .pers and elsewhera. The principt4goeund,
however, on whicu he supported the :motion for referiing;thia.
individual's Petition to a Select Committee was, that she was
in possession of documents, ,confirmatory of her claim, pur-
porting to be signed by Mr. Dunniag and other persons, arse
signatures had been proved genuine. One of those documents
-was his late Majesty s will, which she was prepared to prove.
,N;foomuwisuethuwinseisrletraJabdtoiyouiliiu4-ai.sltaodiun
yedeeertitiber;;t: creditors were desirmis of
being the administrators of the willa,akureesienecoutiti6tntgynwolfenecthilioisnuoagikt:citehirlees
Other documents. He had seen a document in the Duke, of
Kent's own hand-writing, stating that Lord Warwick had teld
his Royal Highness the whole transaction, as also that he hid
been ordered by his late Majesty not to disclose it until. fter
his (the King's) death. The Duke of Kent was so Convinced
that this statement wits true, that under his own hand-writing
he promised' to pay this woman a certain aim of money ;. thus
showing that he beliested her to be the legitimate daughter of
his uncle, the late Duke of Cumberland. lie supported*
motion for the Select Committee,. as aiiiirding the best means
by which the afair could be investigated- , 2-
Mr. Secretary PEEL said, that what had fallen from the. Ho.
nourable Baronet and the Honourable' Gentleman imposed
:upon him the duty to be very explicit upon this subjectt end at
,once to state the facts respecting it. He would prove, to their
!complete satisfaction, either that this lady had practised one of
the most impudent impostures that had ever been conceived,
or that she had been deceived into the line of conduct
which she had adopted, by the impositions of others.—
. The Honourable Baronet had committal the trifling omission
'of not stating the petitioner's case; and had thereby rendered
'it necessary for him (Mr. Peel) to explain:to the Boost- what
that case was. This he would do as shortly as possible. There
were two brothers, of the name of Wilmot • the one, -Doctor
Wilmot, a Clergyman; the other, Mr. Robert Wilmot. . The
lade, who advanced the claims in gnestioa, was the daughter
,of Mr. Robert Wilmot. Proof bud been obtained of her birth,
her baptism, &c. For a considerable period of time the lady
had been contented with this humble origin. But, in the year
1017, she discovered all at one that she was the daughter, not,
of Mr. Robert Wilmot, but of the late Duke of Cumberland
his late Majesty's brother. At this time, however, she, did not -
neat present, profess to be his Royal Highness's sole and legi-
timate daughter. In 1017, she only professed to be his
itlf-
gitimate daughter. She presented a Petition: to his Majesty,
signed " Olivia Serres," in which she declared that she was an
possession of attestations, signed by the late Lord Warwick,
and the late Mr. Robert Wilmot, declaring that site was
the daughter of the late Duke of Cumberland by Mrs. Payne,
wife of Captain Payne late of the Royal Navy, and sitter
of the late Mrs.. Wilipot, . and that she hail been born in
Warwick Castle: 'Stich, ,was in 1017 the alleged ' filet, of
which she said sheaves in possession Of the attestation. In
1819, however, the lady became dissatisfied with deducing her
origin from an illegitimete source, and suddenly declared that
she was the sole and.cl4tintate daughter of the late Duke
of Cumberland, by a daughter of the late• Dr. Wilmot's.—
Her allegation in 1019 was, that Dr. Wilmot had a daughter
who was privately married to the late Duke of. Cumber-
land in the year 1767—that (which was Certainly true) the
late Duke of Cumberland was married to Mrs. .Horton in
1769—that in consequence his Royal Highness comntitted.'his
gamy—for that, as the Royal Marriage Act was not then. in
existence, the first marriage was valid, and the second illegal.
She also alleged that she was in possession of documents signed
by the late Lord Warwick, declaring that she was the oflitpring
Of the first marriage, and therefore that she was his Royal
Highness's legitimate datigh&r. These documents, however,
by some means or other, did not make their appearance until
after LordNVarwick's death.
Sir 0. NOEL said the fact was, that she did not receive them
until after Lord Warwick's death.

Mr. Seeretary PEEL promeded. It was another mysterious
cireumstance, that none of these documents were produced,
until immediately after the death. of the person who wtis said
to have assisted at this lady's birth. They all, however, went,
as she asserted, to prove the private marriage 1707, and her
birth. But then she had to account for her being brought'up
the daughter (WAIL Robert Wilmot. This she did in her usual
easy manner. She alleged that Mrs. Wilmot had a still-born
child, and that she, the petitionor, was substituted for tlifit
stillborn child, and was educated as Mrs. Wilmot's daughter,
with an understanding that the real fact should not 'bedis.
closed until after the death of his late Majesty. It was quite
evident that he could not go into all the' alleged proofs of this
story; nor would it benecessary to Multiply instances of their
falsehood. If he could show that two of the .most material
of the documents relied on were fabricated, namely, the will
of his late Majesty, and the marriage certificate, it would be
quite sufficient to establish the character of the rest. Nay,
if he could Prove the fabrication of the last document he had
mentioned it would be enough. This Lady claimed 15:,000t.
under au instrument which she called the will of his late' Me.
jesty, signed June 2, 1774, by his late Majesty, and witnessed
by J. Dunning and Lord Chatham. The terms of this-alleged
will were rather singular. They were to the following effect :
" George It. In case of my demise, I give and bequeath to
Olive, my brother of Cumberland's daughter, the sun; of
15,0001. ; and I command my successor to pay her that sum as compensation for her misfortunes." This instrument:pro.
fatted to be witnessed by Mr. Dunning and Lord Chatham.
Lord Chatham, as theilouse knew, resigned the seals in 1700,
and never afterwards was in t Vice. In 1772, he made a speech
in warm and direct opposition to his Majesty's Government.,
In 1775 he moved an Address to the King, praying his Majesty
to give Orden for the removal of Gen. Gage frondßoaton. They
who knew the sentiments of his bite Majesty on the subject
of the American war would find it difficult to believe. that
under such circumstances he would select Lord Chathariito be
his confident in a private traria:it-don such 413 that in question.
In fact, Lord Chatham cominencet: hie speech by saying:..
" As I hare not the honour of access to his Majesty, I trust
that by this constitutional ebonite! I may have the oppor.
tunity of making known to his Majesty the Miseendueent his
Ministers." But there wits another of this lady's documeets,
said to he signed by Lord Chatham, of a 4111 more extritii.
nary nature. Would the House believe that a man of Lord
Chatham's known character would so dishonour himseWas to
give under his hand such a statement as the following
Ills Royal highness the Duke of Cumberland having suh.
jected himeelf to the laws against bigamy, we agree that his
dauhter Olive shall be sacrificed, in order that the conaiet of herßoyal Father may never be called in question." It was
on the 20th January, 1775, that Lord Chatham moved the
Address to the King for the removal of General Gage and
the British Army from Boston, yet he was represented
by this lady as in about six weeks afterwards, as certifying, tb
such a document as the following by Dr. Wilmot 'Plus is
to costify, that the Princess Olive, the only legitimate child of
his R. H. the Duke of Cumberland, commonly called Plive
Wilmot, bred up as my brother's daughter, may he Itniityrl by
a large anti brown spot of g liver colour on her right rib."' /The
laughter of the house, which had repeatedly broken :Verdi
during the Right Hon. throlemen's statement, now bectime
unbounded.)—Certainly it' WWI net very probable that .I;tird
Chatham or Mr. Dunning would he the men selected to ifistu
such a certificate as that. Illit all this was immaterial as
pared with what regarded the marriage certificate. It war 'i
the following cf4.o. ;

" AlArtll-4,.1767.'

.
" I hereby certify that his R. 11. Frederick Duke Of Culra=,.
Berland was this day married to Olive Wilmot, the: triarriagt,
being solemnized after the due publication of bans according
to the rites of the Clturch.of.England,
" Witness--Ilitooxt. . JAMES WILMOr.
;home
—Now this James Wilmot was the real uncle of the petiticri
It wits utterly impossible that be could :have solemnir.4.the
marriage on the 4th of ,March, 1767, becauie it appearid on
examination dist lir a a ; at that time a Fellow" or 'Trinity Col.
lege ; that he watt liviog at Trinity Vollege on that tittyy and did
not leave it until the if th of March. So much for sill
Then there were tiffs witnesse*--the late, Lord Wariticii and
Mr. Adder. With respect to the first, he (Mr. Peel) had a
communication from the present Lord 'Warwick, stating that
he himself, before he came to his tide, used to'001" f t Brooke,"
but that unfortunately his progenitor, whose name was attached
to the certificate, before he came to the title, alwoy.l likned

. - .
titanic," anti that by the name, and that name alone,l
are wax always known. There remained the signature of James
Adder. A person hail been sent down to Warwick to inquire i
if thete existed any recolleetion.of such a person. The nfor-
,mation With; which he returned Was 'rather startling: namely,
that a.ninriber of persons recolleeted Dr. Adder, who was'very •
intimate at Warwick Castle. On further inquiry, however,
it tarried out. that the real name, which the good people of
Waisv irk pronounced "Adder," Wits " Haddow ;" being that
of a Scotch gentleman, who having taken his degree at. St.
Aorlrew's,lived afterwards at Warwick. Was it neeenarY for
him to: say any niore ?---( Loud cries of no, no !)--,--He really
diouglit the Hon. 'Baronet himself must be quite satisfied.
Still,-hOwevd, if the'lltm. Baronet were determined to per,
severe in•this Lady's cause, 'there was another claim on which:
he llllr. Peel) did not wish to throw the slightest' discredit.
He held in Ids hand a Manifesto to the people of Poland, in
which her Royal Highness the Priness ()live of Cumberland
asserted her right as the grand-daughter and heiress of Augustus
Ilanislaus, to the high Royal, and ecclesiastical dignities of the
Sovereign of that State. Thus it appeared that this Lady
had'tvid strings to her bow. With her claim to he a Polish
Princess belted not the.slightest wish to interfere, satisfied with
having shewri that she had no pretension to that rank in. England.
Sir r. NOElk had not before been acquainted with the facts
stated by the Right Hon. Gentleman, but he thought they
ought; all to be told again to a Select Committee. Assertion
was ,no, proof; and what the Right Hon. Gentleman had said
required to he established by evidence.
Thellon. Baronet seemed to be at first determined to press
the House to a division, but he afterwards declined doing so,
and the motion was instantly and loudly negatived.
MERCHANT AND FACTOR.
J. SMITH- obtained leave .to bring in a bill to amend
the .14aw 'of Merchant arid Factor.
ENGLISH CATHOLICS.
'Lord NU(IENT suggested that the bill relating to English
Catholics Might be advanced a stage without debate, in order
to RelrepOt its being lost for want of time.
t
M,GOULBURN said that he was bound in honour not to
give Way to the Noble Lord, as lie had given the Hon. Mem-
ber for Code Castle reason to suppose that he should not do so,
who had left the House upon that assurance:
Afteia feW further,'observations front r Lord NUGENT and
Mi. Sec. Gator iwG, the House went into a Committee upon the
IRISH TITHE COMPOSITION BILL.
The remaining clauses of the Bill were then gone through,
most of them were agreed to, and a few were postponed. •
Mr. GOULBUR N said it was his intention to move that the
Bill as altered should be printed, and afterwards recommitted.
The house having resumed, the Report was ordered to be
received to Friday.
ENGLISH CATHOLIC BILL.
Lord NTJGENT moved the second reading of this Bill. It
was not his intention to offer any observation upon the prin-
ciple ofit until a more advanced stage of it.
Sir GEORGE HILL said, he understood 'many •of his
friends were disposed to let this Bill pass unopposed, because
it was hard that the English Catholic should not have the same
benefit as the Irish one had at present. He, however, de-
cidedly objected to the principle of the Bill ; and he thought
it better to State as much, lest his 'silent vote might be under-
stood as an acquiescence in that principle. Much mischief had
emmed since the elective franchise 'hod been conceded to the
Irish Roman Catholics. He warned the English Gentlemen
against pasting this measure; It would rouse the known energy
and ambition of the Catholics. Ile should not press for a di-
vision, but he objected to the Bill.
Mr. W. BANKS opposed' the Bill. lie had no objection
to admitting the Catholics of England into the Magistracy, but
'he opposed granting them the Elective Franchise.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said the Bill went to re-
lieve every person from taking the oath of supremacy. It did
not confine the concession to Catholics. On this ground he
should oppose the Bill. Besides'there were many offices which
ought to be acepted from the Bill, even if the principles of it
were sanctioned.

Mr. Secretary PEEL said be should have several objections
to make to the details of the Bill. He could not consent to
abolish the Oath of Supremacy. The exceptions too were
very unsatisfactory. The Scotch Judicial Bench had not been
excepted—the Governors of Colonies.had not been excepted.—
' lie admitted that these objections were capable of being refine.
died in a Committee, but he thought it fair to state them. Ile
would consent to put the English Catholics on an equal footing
with those of Ireland, but to nothing else.
Mr. BANKES said the bill embraced a wider principle than
'that upon which the Noble Lord had obtained leave to bring it
' in. II e did not understand the 11111 as it was now framed. It
stated the word 4‘ franchise," which was a word of large in..
port, and should be properly defined ; as it now stood, it
might extend to the corporate as well as the elective franchise.
.—The bill professed to copy the Irish Art; but it was copied
'very strangely and irregularly, and there were many omissions.
No Colonial Governor 'was excepted from the bill ; but surely
'those who represented the Sovereign should be bound by the
'same oath as that which bound the sovereign himself. He should
not divide the House on the question for the scconil reading,
for there were a few of the provisions of which he approved.
Mr. WETHERELL said, that as the Bill was at present
framed, he was inclined to oppose every line of it. Upon the
principle of the Bill, however, he was very much disposed to
agree with his Right Hon. Friend (Mr. Peel), and he hoped to
sec the Bill favourably altered.
The Bill was then read a second time.

•
Lord NUGENT said, he would now be tempted .to enter in.
•to a discussion of the principles of the Bill. fie had endea-
voured to make it a copy, as near as possible, of the, Military
Hill of
,1816. The Hon. Member for Corfe Castle had asked
'llia several questions, hut he would ask one of that Honour.
able Member. , If the Hon. Member should ever think of sell.
• ing the Borough of Corfe Castle, would he pUt the Oath of
:,upremacy to the hrtended,purchaser ?
Mr. BAN KES said he thought the question put to him by
the Noble Lord savoured'Ver7 much, cif rirdeness and personality,
-.He supposed it arose from 'a mistaken opinion of the Noble
Lord, that he (Mr. B.) had offered a frivolous opposition to the
hilt. He would, however, answer the question„, If he were
' ever inclined to part with property supposed to convey political
power, he . should think he deserted his duty if be sold it to
'persons who.he thought would abuse it.—(Cheers.)
Lord NUGENT explained. He feared he had, indeed, put
tint queltion too abruptly; and he must. admit that the answer
• showed. the Mt!. Member to be consistent in his opinions.
The Bill ivas then ordered to he committed on Monday.
DISTILLERIES Bl I.L.

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the

second readingq of ii; lhyiillery Bill. - •
Lord A.IIAMILTON complained that the Commissaries
of Scotland .Bill had not been brought under discussion. The
Noble Lord moved na an.amendment, 'that the Bill to which
lie alluded be read n second time.
The LORD ADVOCATE said he was ready to bring on
the Bill this night, if the business of the House would permit.
Mr. J. P. GRANT supported the amendment; •
Mr. KENNEDY expressed himself anxious for the discus-
' sion of the Bill. ' •
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, if the
amendment , had not been moved the. Noble Lord. would 'have
'been nearer tollibdiseussio» of the Bill. The Distilleries Bill
WWI As impoftant tbScotland as any other Bill.
• .1404,JA: explained. •
The amendment wait then negatived.
RIQ_E eva.pressedb hope the Bill might dot be harried
tiirought the House.
CH ANCELtIOR Ofthe EXCHEQUER said 4 Depu-
uition from the. Distillers'in 'lreland was in London, and tnoy
would Alava abundant oppettinities of expressing their sintt-
lsetsvot before the Bill gassed.
The Bill was read *second time, and committed for to-aterrow.
(In the Order of the Day for the second reading 'of the Corn-
''othysaries of Scotland Bill
Mr. KIINNEDY. said he would fix Friday for the discus.
'sight. If the Bill was bretight on forthwith, he should move an
Adjournment.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, he

- should have no objection if the discussion was brought on early
'on Friday.
!sir. KENNEDY said, he should endeavour to bring it on
-.as early as possible.
The LORD ADVOCATE moved the third reading of the
Scotch Confirmation Bill.
After a few observations from Mr. J. P. G nar;T, Mr. Kix-
.riotivr, and Lord A. HAMILTON, the Bill was read a third
.time and passed. .
The LORD ADVOCATE then moved, the third reading of
the Scotch Commissaries' Bill.
Lord A. HAMILTON opposed the third. reiaing, in conse-
quence of the lateness of the hour.—The House divided— .
For the third reading - 56
Against it - , 21
Majority - 35
fiord A. HAMILTON again opposed the Bill, and moved
'the Adjournment of the House.
The motion was not seconded..
Mr. KENNEDY moved the Bill be read this day six months.
Mr. RAN T immediately after moved the House do adjourn.
'Mr. J. SMITH expressed a hope that the question of ad-1
jeurnment might not be carried, as it would tend to delay pub-

re busmem. • • •
Mr. HUME wished the Noble Lord to withdraw the motion
for the third reading ef the Bill.
The LORD ADVOCATE thought he had been met with
'vexatious opposition to the Bill.
Sir G. CLERK said much time had been lot in debate quite
useless. lie thought the Bill might have been discussed.
'the Marquis of-TITO-11'1E14D, before the House divided,
,eomplaihed that the Deer Bill was carried „yesterday contrary

to an understanding entered into by his Majesty's Ministers.
It was understood no public business was to canto on before
the motion respecting. the Chief Baron of Ireland, He came,
down to the House at four o'clock, and found that the Bill had
been passed. •
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER disclaimed
all intention of taking the Noble Lord by surprises Half:Tog
four o'clock had arrived, and them being no public btismess
before the House, he moved the third reading of the Bill. Ile
was no party to any understanding on the subject.
The House then divided*
For the Adjournment - 9
Against it - 44
Majority - -
Mr. HUMS still objected to the third reading, and proposed
to adjourn the discussion to this day.
The LORD ADVOCATE, unwilling to put the HOuse to
inconvenience, was willing to withdraw lus Motion for the
Order of the Day.
The disCussion was fixed for this evening (Thursday).
The other Orders were read, and the• House adjourned at
lIALF-PAST ONE O'CLOCK. ,

A LIST OF THE MAJORITY
Who voted for the Usury Bill going into a Committee. ~
Barnard, Viscount flume, J. :Scott, J. - •
Bcnett, J. Kemp, T. R. Smith, a.
Browne, D. Lamb, Hon. G. Tennyson, C.
Caleraft, John Moberly, J. Titchfield, 31arg.
Campbell, W. F. Moberly, W. L. Whitbread, S. C.
Copley, Sir Al. S. Marjortbanks, S. Williams, W.
Davies, Colonel Money, W. T. Wilson, T.
Evans, W. Moult, J. D. . Wood, M.
Forbes, C. Phillips, G. sea. Wynn, RLHn.W.
Gordon, Hon. W. Poyntz, W. 8;
(irenfell, P. Ricardo, D. ~ TELLERS.
Berries, J. C. . Rice, T. S. . ` Smith, W.
Hobbouse, J. C. Rickfmil, Wm. '

MINORITY
Illackburne, J. Jervoise, O. P. Pryse,
Cheere, E. M. Kennedy, T. F. Taylor, M. A.
Desbrowe, E. C. Mundy, F. Webbe, E.
Douglas, W. K. .Pahner, C. F. TELLERS.
Estcourt, T. (3. Powell, W. E. Davenport, 1).
Ileatheote, J. G. Plumber, John Williams, Sir R.