The Sun.
London, England, 1847-03-06 00:00:00

AIARCII 6, 1847.

PRICE SD.

PART _/S..kTiEN TA.:LY L„;F_,l.Nrrl-,SS.

From t - Votes and Proceeding,. of the Rouse of Commons,
THURSDAY, MARCH. 4.

;_e nndernamcd Railway Bill was presented, reed a first
time, and ordered to be read a second time:—

EdintAirgh and Northern (Improvement of the Ferry be-
tween Ferry Port on Craig and the Northern Shore of the
River Tay)—" to enable the Edinburgh and Northern Rail-
way Company to improve the ;Ferry between Ferry Port on
Craig anu the North Shore of the River 'ray."

The following Railway Bills were read a second time, com-
mitted, and referred to the Committee of Selection :
Edinburgh and Northern, and Edinburgh, Leith, and Gran-
ton Amalgamation.
Great Northern (Deviations between London and Grantham.)
Direct London and Portsmouth, Brighton and Chichester,
London, Brighton, and South Coast, and London and
South-Western.
Newcastle and Berwick (East Coast Line, Blyth, Seaton
Sluice, and other Branches).
York and North Midland (Hull Station and Branches).
York and North Midland (Harrogate Branch Extension
and Terminus).
York and Newcastle (Wearmouth Dock Enlargement).
York and Newcastle, Newcastle and Berwick, and North
British Amalgamation.

LI ISG ORDERS CO Allllll
The following following Resolutions were reported from the above
Committee :

STANDIN

AIITTEE.

1. That iu the case of the Falmouth Waterworks petition,
to insert the petition for the Bill on the list of petitions for
Private Bills, the standing orders ought to be dispensed
with :—That the petition be inserted accordingly.
2. That in the case of the Edinburgh and Northern Rail-
way (Branch from Burntisland to Dunfermline Branch, Site.
petition, the standing orders ought not to be dispensed with.
3. That in the case of the Parkgate and Chester and
Birkenhead Junction Railway petition, the standing orders
ought to be dispensed with :—That the parties be permitted
to proceed with their Bill.
4. That in the case of the Oxford, Worcester, and Wol-
verhampton Railway (No. I—Extension and Amendment)
petition, the standing orders ought to be dispensed with
That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill.
5. That in the case of the Eastern Counties Railway
(Branch from Stratford to the Victoria Park, &c.) petition,
the standing orc'ers ought not to be dispensed with.
6. That in the case of the Axholme Railway (from the
Leeds and Selby Railway to Gainsborough) petition, the
standing orders ought to be dispensed with :—That the
parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill.
7. That in the case of the Tyne Docks petition the stand-
ing orders ought to be dispensed with :—That the parties be
permitted to proceed with t heir Bill.
8. That in the case of the Surrey and Kent Commission of
Sewers petition, the standing orders ought not to be dis-
pensed with.
9. That in the case of the Belfast Improvement petition,
the standing orders ought to be dispensed with :—That the
parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill.
10. That in the case of the Lough Neagh Drainage peti-
tion, the standing orders ought to be dispensed with :—That
the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill.
11. That in the case of the Enfi.ld and Edmonton Rail-
way Extension petition, the standing orders ought to be
dispensed with :—That the parties be permitted to proceed
with their Bill, with the exception of that part which enables
them to sell or lease the undertaking to the Great Northern,
or to the Eastern Counties Railway Company, and which
enables such Companies to purchase or accept a lease of the
same.

12. That in the case of the London Sewage Chemical
Manure petition, the standing orders ought to be dispensed
ith :—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their
Bill, on fbrthwith depositing in the Court of Chancery such
a sum, in addition to one- twentieth part of three-fourths of
the amount of the estimate already deposited, as will make
the total sum deposited equal to three-fourths of the amount
subscribed.

13. That in the case of the Manchester, Birmingham, and
North Staffordshire Junction Railway petition, the standing
orders ought to be dispensed with :—That the parties be per-
mitted to proceed with their Bill, with the exception of that
pa, E which confers powers on the London and North-Western
Railway Company, the North Staffordshire Railway Com-
pany, the Manchester, Buxton, Matlock, and Midlands
Junction Railway Company, and the Sheffield, Ashton•
under. Lyne, and Manchester Railway Company.
That the Committees on the three preceding Bills do exa-
mine, in the first place, how far such orders have been com-
plied with; and do report the same to the House on the re-
port of the Bill.
First, third, fourth, sixth, seventh, ninth, tenth, eleventh,
twelfth, and thirteenth resolutions agreed to.—Report to lis
on the table.

NOTICES GIVEN AT TIIF: PRIVATE BILL-OFFICE.
The following Railway Bills are appointed to be read a
second time:—

MONDAY, MARCH 8.

Swansea Valley.
Vale of Neath.
South Wales.
Ipswich and Bury St. Edmund's (No. 4—Branch from
Stowmarket to Sudbury).
Edinburgh and Bathgate (Deviation and Amendment).
Waterford and Lrnerick.
Great North of India.
Birmingham and Oxford Junction, and Birmingham, Wol-
verhampton, and Dudley Railways Amalgamation.
Midland (Gloucester and 'tonehouse Junction).
Midland (Cheltenham. Warwick, and Leamington Line).
Slunsea and Amman Junction.
Dundrum, and Ratlffarnham (Extension to Ste-
phen's-green).
Leeds, Dewsbury, and Manchester (Ossett Branch and
Dewsbury and Morley Stations).