The Sun.
London, England, 1815-03-04 00:00:00

CORN BILL.

On the motion of the Chancellor of the
chequer that this Bill he read a seconatime ;
Mr. LAMBTON deprecated the haste with which
such an important measure was attempted to be
hurried through its stages, and stated that front
his conviction of the propriety and necessity of
delay,, it was his intention to move, tliat instead_
ofinow, the Bill be read a second time this day
six. mouths. He-would never consent that a mea:-
sure should pass that noose agitinst which the
voice of the people had been so generally and un-
etonvocally expressed.
Mr. J. 'Snif-fo 'was also in fa•otir of delay. He
observed that the distress of the fanner had been.
great, from the distress of credit, and bin front
the quantity of Corn imported. The Corn of
our last harvest was'alsO of an inferior quality, by
ichiCh the farmer .had Sustained a loss. It had
- been' asserted that this country could grow Corn
enough for its own consumption : he was of this
opinion, though the quantity produced in the last
two years might justify a contrary inference. As
our pdpulation had so greatly increased within
the last tea or twelve years as, to amount to se-
venteen or eighteen 'mottled thousand more than
when the preceding centum was taken—ot,course
an increase of agriculture was necessary for their
subsistence. When, therefore, it was clear that
thiS subject affected the whole population of the
country, he thought that much more time ought
to be given to the consideration of it than it had
yet received, if-it were only to.obtain the sense of
the country, by the reception of the numerous Pe-
titions that were in preparation. The subject of
the average bad not, in his opinion, undergone
sufficient discussion. It was also desirable tab)
hear further evidence, that the House might see its
way. more fully. He had read the evideucept last
year ; and was not coin inced from it, that the
protecting price ought to be 80s.; because the
persons who so expressed themselves, had formed
their opinion from the state of the taxes, and the
price of labOnr at the time. If labour should
fall 15 or 20 per cent. unquestionably the far-
mer would be benefitted, and enabled to sell his
Corn at a cheaper rate. He thought that a fall
in the &ice of labour was inevitable; for th9ugh •

vlan the Mile* ere dis-
'banded, and tile Se finer: _still 'employed were
these, great ilittabers of persoas who would
'be flyvown an the puhlie u-ould not be inclined to
'abour, yet he was of a different opinion. Per-
-sons who had been abroad. or pent up for years
'on ship-board,- were always anxious to return to
'labour When they got borne, and this would cause
tile price of labour to fall. Then when this hap-
'pened, there could be no question that 755. or
'even 725. would be a fair protecting price. He
persuaded, that if the Bill was precipitately
'pressed, it won'd have the effect of exciting disaf-
fection and tumults. Ire was aware that the agri-
-cultural interest was as important as any other in
the country; but if greater, time were not given
fin. the consideration of the subject it might be
:upposed that the decision had been prbduced by
in.trested motives. On these grounds be should
'second the Amendment. _

Mr. BABINGTON agreed with the Hon. Gentle-
-I:nan who spoke last. While it was admitted that
respect should be paid to agriculture, and that the
people should he fed from their own soil, the
claims of commerce ought not to be forgotten.—
Our Navy could not be kept up without foreign
trade ; and mminfactnres could not be produced,
unless labour and all things dependant upon it
‘vcre procurable at a reasonable rate. The Hon.
Gentlemmeiben alluded to the improved state of
the Continental manufactories, in proof of the
struggle which our trade would have to make for
future success, and contended, that as commerce
and manufactures were out natural security, we
ought to take care not to press any point that
might endan-.!..;-er them. tie thought, that as the
price of labour and .the rent of lands ought and
woulegraduallv sink to what they were in 1804,
that SOs. was tar too high as the permanent pro-
tecting price of Corn. No doubt Corn could be
griwn much cheaper in Ireland than in this _coon-
try, even as cheap as in France, where the export
prOhibitory price is fixed at 40s. If, therefore, the
Irish farmer bad 635. he would have a sufficient
stimulons for extending his agricultural pursuits ;
and these, with England, would go very far to- ,
wards supplying our wants. The unnatural rise
thl4t had taken place in rents was owing to the
unnatural course of events since. 1804, and
they must he reduced to enable our farmers to
live. \%e ought not to grow quire-enough for our
own consun:ption, in crrder that our manufactures
might lie taken in exchange for the portion sup-
plied by foreign.ers. If we do, we shall derange
commerce ; and in order that --no such derange-
ment mit.,,ht be hazarded, a moderate importation
would be desirable.

Sir J.NEWPQRT declared that nobody was more
concerned for the manufacturing interests than.
hiinself ; and if he believed that this measure,
-while it benefitted the agricidteral interests, would
iajure oar manufactures, he would not support it.
Eat a great proprirtion of the agricultural • popu-
lation of the empire were looking to the delibera-
tions of that House, under unexampled pressure.
In Ireland the great proportion of the whole po-
pulation were wholly dependant unon agriculture,
and it they were pot encouraged, they must ab-
solutely starve, as they had no relief from poor
laws. He could prove that the majority of the
la-bouring poor in Ireland had been, from the
iniddle of November till the middle of Ja-
no,u y, waiting for agrietiltural labour, and
had trot been able to gain a day's .employmept.
He would appeal to the manufacturers, a'nd
ask them whether they would wish such a •
large proportion of the Irish population to be
placed in sueh.a situation, and also, whether by
withhblding the blessings within their reach, they
would hazard keeping that' population in.a con-
dition that-would snake them dangerous to the
rest' of the community (.I.lltp Right Hon. Baro-
net then einsted, from a statement c.f the popula-
tion of certain manufacturing districts. ;ti Ireland,
the numhers devoted to agriculture, and contrast-
ed: them with those empro-yed in manufactures,
nun{ proved that even in these places, the pro-
portion of the agricaltarists was as two to oue of
the artisans. From this he drew the inference,
that the checking of the agriculture of Ire-
land would be vitally felt in every part of that
conntry. He then repeated the arguments he had
lately advanced respecting the benefit derived by
oor manufacturing interests, from the. interchange
with Ireland of their goods for Corn, and con-
tended that as, by the prohibitiOn of all foreign
mantifactured goods, Ireland had been made com-
pletely dependent upon England, it was but right
that she should look to her for relief. At present,
however, lie contended, the want of Confidence
lit:tween the two countries had become so great,
that their commercial intercourse was nearly sus-
: pended. He deprecated the amendment now pro-
posed, the interest of which was evidently to put
off all farther discussion for another year. It had
been urged that the delay would give time fOr pe-
titioning against the Bill from every part of; the
Empire ; but if the same pains hail been taken in
Ireland, to produce petitioiss on the opposite side
of the question., as had been taken here, against
the Bill, there could be no doubt. that they wottld
have been proportionably numerous. In all ques-
tions concerning subsistence, the Honse ought to
use its own discretion, and not be swayed by 'Pe-
titioners; for it was well known that the people
at large, so far front considering what Was their
real interest, would be ready to purehas'eTa, cheap
loaf for the present, though inev.itilei faMine
should be the future consequence,4lte 'Right
lion. Paronet, after• much further argiiihent in,
behalf of Ireland, concluded with strongly depre-
cating delay as-tending to drive the country into
a situation to which every rational titan must la-
merit to see it reduced.
Sir F. Fi.onD considered the amendment to be
monstrous, and contended that delay would have
the effect of throwing Ireland into a state or agi-
tation. He would tell those who had asserted
that the Irish farmer was not oppresSed by taxes,
tinit•there was almost every tax in that country as
in -England : there was the Horse the Ser7
vants"fax, the Window Tax, and there ',was one
which the people of England knew nothing
about, but which he wished to see introdneed, as
it,would fall upon the rich—he meantibe Hearth
Tax. He repeated twiny of the arguments that
had been adduced in behalf of the just _agrictil.- I
theist, and.afs6r de-seanting on the necessity of
but lesrts of the empire being on the most friendly

lootlng together, 'lit .b4ving his
tiecidecl negative to the amendment.
Alderman C. Sst MI said, the ametuhnent shoal('
have his vote, as a pure friend to his country. T.
oppose it would look as if the House was afraid
to give time for receiving the Petitions, the prayer
of which would prove irresistible.
Mr. LAMBERT.said, that he had had many op-
portunities of witnessing the extreme distress of
agricultural labourers. Since the last recess more
complaints had been made to him of want of
work, than he had ever heard since he had been
in the commission of the peace. An opinion had
gone forth that this measure would raise the price
of Corn ; but how was this effect to be produced ?
All inquiries into the state of the Corn-market at
this time, prove that it is very low and very dull.
As'far as proofs would go, he was confident that
a rise in the price was not the effect to be feared.
Lord MILTON said be was the Representative
of a very great and extensive county, great part
of which was inhabited by agriculturists, and as
great a part also by manufacturers, and it would
be his wish to attend as much as possible to the
several interests of both. It was extremely de-
sirable that the manufacturer should not pay too.
high a price for his bread; but while he was Will-
ing to allow that, would it be fair to adopt in
their favour.meaSures that would ruin the farmer,
and starve the agricultural labourer ? He had that
very day held a conversation with a Gentleman
just come to town from a part of the- country
called Bedford Level, which was a considerable
corn district, and the popalatiOn about. 13,000
persons ; and that Gentleman assured him that
one 61f of the population were now receiving pa-.
rochial relief. He thought, however, the Bill
would be much amended and rendered more•pala-
table by not being made a permanent measure.—
The Corn of last year was by no means good, and
therefore the Old Corn of 1813 had rose to 70s.
which ‘,:rould certainly not he a ruinous price' at
present; but. it things were continued in- this
state, ruin must follow. It was absolutely neces-. '
sary something should be done. Whether 725.
0r.765. or 80s. were preferable, was the point to
determine. - For his own part, he did not think
80s. toohigha price, but he would leave it to
the House to biay, what it should be. He was,
therefore, in favour of the

Mr. THONI'StiN wished that every word that
had been said in that House on the subject could
be heard abroad.. The distresses amongst-the
agricultural labourers in this country were unexe
ampled. Before he had come from Yorkshire, he
had witnessed such scenes as would have melted
the hardest heart. lit a village, where last year
the people complained of the high price of Corn,
they now exehrimed against the low price, 'and
said, we have.food cheap, but we have no work.
We would rather have a high price and some mo-
ney, than a low price and no money at all. This
distress was the effect of the redaction in the price
of Corn, and the cause was the importation of to-,
reign Corn. It there;had been no importation,
we should have had Corn at areasonabie
proportion to.the price ototherarticles. The Mann-
fhcturinginterests certainly had greater protection,
than the lauded interests, and this seemed always to
have been the policy of the Government. All
fo-
reign manufactures were prohibited, and there •
was no article of clothing worn in this country
from the crown of the head •to the sole of the
foot, which was not of its own manufacture. But
the farmers had no such protection as was athirded
to the rnanaacturerS. They could not export
their cattle,- their wool. or even the skies of the
animals they killed. These privileges of the ,ma-
nufacturers ought therefore to make them the last
people in the world to envy any advantage in con-
templation for the -farmers. iHe believed there
was -not one honest Yorkshire manufacturer who.
did not wish the agriculture of the country to be
effectually supported—(Hear 1) In carrying on
our trade, we know both in our imports and our
exports, that many advantages were derived from
using our own ships. • It might, however, be con-
tended, that with many articles we might be sup-
plied at a. cheaper rate, if foreign ships might be
employed without restriction, and this would not
be less reasonable than the opposition given to
the present measure. In the year 1463,
.an Act
was passed, prohibiting the importation of foreign
corn till the price of it rose to mss. Sd. -the quarter.
This prohibition was not attended to ; corn was
still imported, and the consequence was, in 1634,
from a document of which he read' an extract, it
appeared that husbandry had fallen so greatly to
decay, that in villages, where formerly there
were two or three hundred agricultural labourers,
only two or three herdsmen remained. He thought
it was possible, if we did not support our agri-
culture, that a similar falling off in husbandry
would again take place, and that villages now
containing two or three hundred persons, might
be so reduced as to contain but two or three
herdsmen. Within the last '2O or 30 years, a great
amalgamation of talent and science had been 'de-
voted. to the improvement of the agriculture of
the country ; and the result Was, a great supply
of Corn bad been produced, above what had for-
merly been 'raised, without which he knew not -
how the country could have been subsisted, and the
condition of the poor had in consequence been
much bettered. In this country it was necessary
to maintain a..reciprocity of dealing between the
agricilltural interest .- and the manufacturers-4f
the manufacturers were protected, the Legis-
lature must also protect the growers of Corn.
lie.cautioned the House against being .swayed
by the. outcry against the Bill. Ten years ago,
When Prince Talleyrand was very anxious
that Buonaparte should
•make peace with this
Country, , in a Note svritten to him to press his.
subject, his %fords • were—" Leave England in
peace,. and.. her Government will. he., constantly
directed by popular clamour, which we can at any
tinse anti:one and encourage—they will never form
schemes of so disposing of the population of the

_
Country, as to make one portion.of it be useful

to the support of the other. Leave England in
peace, and most of her Nobility and Gentry will
squander their great riches in irauce, to enrich
us, ,and enslave their own country." This was
the language which he had then held. Whether

it -was true or not, he could not take upon hin►-
self to say. lie was not atraid of England being
enslaved by France; and he hoped, by au undue at-

tendon to popular prejudices, the opinions of

Prie,o tineyVaila on OW. Oovetntuttlt. Woqld nbt
be jrntifiech
Mr. Pa E;;IIIN observed, since last year the
view taken of this subject had in many instances
been so changed, that those who then petitioned
against the measure proposed, no longer appeared
to consider such a step expedient. Next to the
agriculture of the country, he contended the ma-
nufacturers ought to he supported ; but the tax
which this measure could in any case impose on
them, was as nothing coMpared with the wages
they received. I-It thought every man of calcu-
lation must perceive this was one of the wisest
schemes that had ever been adopted to equalize
the prices of provision and labour. In every re-
spect he thought it promised great advantages to
the country, and therefore be felt it his duty to
give it his warmest support.
Mr. Martam4 bad uniformlrdeclared himself'
favourable to the principle of the measure, but
against fixing the protecting price at 80s.. He
understood the arguments used by an Hon. Mem-
her in this debate, to be founded on the connec-
tion between the Country Banks and the price of
Corn. He considered nothing had been shewn to
justify them in the importation price so
high;
,and only with a view of opposing that
price, did he intend to vote for the amendment.
Mr. PROTHEIWE was hostile to the measure.—
If 80s. were mined as the protecting price, it was
his opinion the average prices would be very little
below it.
,
Mr. WARDELL Stipporte'm the Bill, and com-
plained of the yputation thrown on the conduct
of an Hun. Member by another, who had spoken
of the connection hew een the Country banks and
the price 'of corn. Those who knew that Hon.
Gentleman, knew him incapable of acting from
such base motives as had been ascribed to him.

Mr. MARRYATT Oat what had fallen trOm
him had been ntiseenstrhed. He hied tneant to
cast no imputation on any one ; be had only re-
ferred to the influence. which .a paper currency had
on the price Of corn.
. 111 r. LOCKHART was not surprised that a great,
outcry was raised against, this measure after the
descriptions 'which had been given of it by a Chief
Magistrate, and by several Members of that
_ j .

flonSe. The prices.of Wheat and Bread,' he ob-
served; did not always tally. In the cbtintry, at
sonic fifty or sixty'miles distant, the price of Bread
was generally twopence under the London price,
and it was a common thing for it to be sent to
town by the coach, and sold at a profit then. The
public mind had beet) inflamed by mis-statements ;
it. had formerly been slaeivn, that when Wheat was
at 903. the qtrarter, the Quartern Loaf code-lie'
sold at 13y. yet a certain Chief Magistrate- Ud•
lately said, at 80s. its price must be from 15 to
He was not the advocate of any particular
class of nten, he fresired to do that which would
pr,).ve 'beneficial to all classes. He anxiously hoped
another year .rinild not be suffered to piss before
this measure was ad4ted. If it were not carried
eren the manufacturer would suffer-, and the free-
holder must know, that for the penny or three-
halfpence which' be might save in a loaf, he would
lose ten 'times the amount of such saving in se-
curity. Those most anxious to oppose this Bill
would be found to be persons more solicitous to
gain popularity . than studious to understand the
merits of the question. The labourers, who were
now reduced to the situation of what. was called
in the country rounds:nen, would, if this measure
were not agreed to, soon become mendicants, and.
mendicants, where bread could not be raised.
Mr. PROTHEROE explained.

Mr. ELLIOT said. that when a measure of a si-
milar nature r rop-osed last'year, be had voted
against it. He thought then that the tihie was ill
adapted for it, and . oat sufficient information had
not been obtained ;Ipon a subject So di:ll..cullt and.
at the same time so delicate. No man was, gc+,o-
rally speaking, more averse to 'political 'regula-
tions upon such subjects than himself. Notwith-,
standing this general feeling, yet, upoit the infor-
mation that was now before the House, he could
not avoid thinking, :hat both for the protertion of
our agriculture, and the preservation of the power
Of the country, some, regulationS were now ab-
solutely necessary. As to the principle of free and,
unrestricted commerce being a great good, no
body could deny it ; but we were not in a situa-•
tion to apply those general principles to the p-re-
sent question. The inland trade was entirely tinkler

the-protection of the State; but as to foreign trade,
there were two parties to it, and it must deptmd,
not only on the wishes of our Government, but its
duration must also depend upon the volition of ano-

thcrsuite. France had 'wade regulations, for her Corn

\trade, by which, when Corti-was above a certain
price, it was not to be exported. It did not ,sig-
nify what were the wants of other nations:: she

j►►stly said, that they must first take care of their
own people. • The market of France might there-

fore lair us when we most wanted it whereas

Ireland afforded an infinite field of improvement,
and could -be easily r,ade a fruitful and exhaust-
less granary to the whole kingdom. In this re-

_ .
spect, he spoke not only froth his own observation,
but from all the evidenee that had been examined on

that subject. The security of mrintei•nal supply of
Corn was the great shield of our commerce and de-

fence of our manufactures. This security ought not
to be left to hazard, or to the influence of a Ateign
policy. .
Sir JAMES SHAW desired to repel in the strongest
manner thoSe insinuations which had been made

as to the conditct of these %vim Opposed theprs,
sent -question being governed by an anxiety ifOr:
popularity. For his own part, there was no per 7
son, the tenour of whose life admitted .less the

application of' such a charge than his -own. He
held in his hap(' a paper, containing the regulation
of the assize of London for s;..verai.vears, by which
it appeared, that when wheat,. teas at 35.5. in Lon-

don, its ordinary price when the average was 80s.
the quartern loaf W S 157'14.1. It ought not to he
forgotten, that the Committee Ivhich sat two
years ago, recommended an exclusive price of
1355. although the last was contented with 80p:
Mr. ROBINSON begged leave 'to contradict! the!
worthy Alderman, and to sbew that his facts *ere
false, and, of course, his inferences untrue,: al.
though he was prepared to dispute his inferences,
had the facts been incontestible. Upon the clam,
parisoeoof the averages for the last ten years of
the maritime districts with the assize of London,.
it Nppetered that the general average had exceeded

I •

ll
assk.• of Lotlthn ; rtne. roure, ti:"t ;
the 11-ayontity of the Hon. Altteitr ;i,
Late averaKe of the bondon itrict:s tl;llsft"rt
that of the maritime (Ct. trim; to the n•rottot

• 3s. 3d.
•
Lord A. Ilitstitotl askcti, what hehel't
measure could produce to farmers, if it "1",:'
lower the price of corn, as the Right 1j07)•G"T:
man asserted ? The oniv way it coeld
any advantage was by increasing the Free It t"``
article, which he had no doubt %%Wild be the case'
Mr. PonE CAnEW supported_the Bill,
, been
Mr. BARING complained that nothing 0:141 5
said to prove that the price of SOs. proposed 'l:3
really wanted. The whole difficulty of the ":"ci
he conceived, was, whether the Ito enable
land would make some concession, to enable t'.:
the farmers to cultivate the ground ? Were:-Ib
high price of corn to continue, cur nr:ikliactur-ets
would go to other kingdoms in search Of bregli
our population would decrease, and the conotrY
might indeed become an exporting -conotry•—.°
He thought it the duty of the Gentlemen on tb°,
other side of the questiOn to fix the extent of
protection necessary to keep the country in a state
of cultivation
The CHANCELLOR of the ExenEkuot oo°l3.
take atuither opportunity of replying to the arga'
ments used by the Hon. Gentleman. The goes-
tion now before the House NI/a-, not One ut regti;
lation or limitation of. aver:ge or hq
merely whether any legislatlye measure -.11-'ll`
be adopted. It could not be expected, theritor'
that those subjects should have been disetissell.
Mr. WHITBREAD thanked the Cheineeliw ,t 6,11
Exchequer for placing the question in its rig"
point of view. He was convinced that the ctf's.l,
of this measure would be disappointment to tbe
farmer, as it would not supply him with ally
pital to invigorate his culture of the land. 'l'l:i
time was passed also at which the measure col'
have had any influence on the harve3t for the o°''',
season. He concluded by objecting to a tetllo'
rary measure, and as he wished to refove It°
agitation of the public mind, declared that
should support the Amendment.

Mr. ROB.INSON anti Mr. F.kr,ior explained. he
Mr. LI usKissoN was one-of those who. !Oust ".-e
classed among the men wanting common 3el"
and understanding, for he thought the propojec:l
measure would lower the price of Corn, or ai lc"'
keep -it fluctuating between 725. and 80s. if S"'
should be the standard. The Bill would, in fact'
provide a remedy to the high prices which were
oo
contemplated with so much apprehension. G
ki
,forbid that proper attention and respect shoo
not he shown to the petitions of this snbiceisif
but the House were to act; from the impulse - n
their oWn judgment. (HeAr, hear !) llc coc
-eluded by expressing his satisfaction that'
Right lion. Friend persisted in the principle Ili,
affording sufficient protection to the agi
turist.—Mr. IlArallo explained.
The question was then put, and a division t°°l4
place, when the numbers were—,

_ . .
Against the Motion c2i3
Fur it
.56
Majoriti in fa7uur of Ministers .--162
Mr. BARING then moved that the Bill be COI:,
mittcd on Monday se'nnight, when a second 01.
vision took place, and the numbers were--

Against the Amendment 215
For it
Majority against the Amendment —l7l
The Bill was then ordered to be committed
Monday next.
, 7.3 e
When the Gallery was re-opened, the 10.,1,(„
Was in a Committee on the Mutiny :
FITZGERLD was commenting on the exp'res!i(;,li
of Hon. Members, who had accused his
Friend (Lord Palmerston) of indecent col)tiu";,;
and had made some peculiar observatims 09
Chairman.
Mr. WITITDREAD meant no resection on' tre
Chairman ; but thought the proceeding 09,
Bill at that late hour improper in a Publ'c
m o'',f
particularly under the circustances of the Os'
at present.
Lord PALMERSTON never thought that whell
Bill was ordered,,it was necessary to.give a scc°'
notice. ,
- lfre
After some farther conversation betwcet)
Bennet, Lord Palmerston, Lord Miltoo,
Sutton, Lord I'rohy, the Chancellor of the '",3
chequer, Mr. Whitbread, Sir S. Ron illy, °aid
Mr. Fitzg,eiald, the Bill was ordered to be c°

ulitted on Monday next. •
icor
Adjourned at Half past One o'clock till )I°l

nexL
METEOROLOG (CAL JO U 1")
Thermometer. I I Weather'.

. I. J • i... • .
. IN 4 . • VI 1 ..., ~.., ". .' ~.71 %.*
‘..2
, , . ~• :I . ..• Z , .1, ..... •
at' g '.`i7 •'1
;I'4 2:-' -ri es' i.
. 1 :,.. pi. .-;
~i.,,
_,--
___,
,
Feb. 01 0 0 0 • inches Fairq,
18 40 140 4G .13 :30.50 Fair Cit'l"
19 45 46 4R 45 .25 i)(.. IN'
20 48 47 50 45 29.75 .01 Rain* p().:,
1 49 50 55 48 .90 .12 Cloudy Fet,
22 50 49 53 42 30.20 -
ilZi.r c.p.i„00.41
23 45 47 51 44 .25 ,
24 47 48 50 4G .10 Do.
•
' .13.
' 4 Boisterous.
COAL -MARKET, MARCH 3. __,„„. ~i,

' COAL -MARKET, mime
Ships at Market. Ships sold.
G Neweaktle . 384 .. . :
7{ Su►►derla.►id
I - Cinders....
1 Scotch Coal

Price,
.40$. 0,.1. to 44:. Oil'
40s. Od. to 4'. 013,
Od. to tyi•
365. od. to

~.....---- r
BIB.THS.
BalrnriLstienrcnitlnilsa-liln.,n;ffiaeledas,ugtihiteeiL!dy of G. NV. Mariouriottet, :14,
On Sunday week; at Fluchitir, the Lady of A. P• f
A , O
Surgeon of the Roal Navy, ct'a dauhter. ,rifafa.
the Ist inst. iyn
I.llc.unisliury-squgare, Mrs. I,Sr• ."
son.

MARRIED. °foe
citl:4;
Otuthe'2d ult. at Berwick, IVlr..Truncs el
aerat Post-Office, Edinburgh, to Miss Marg-art *
daughter of Mr. Robert Car, Apothecary, Bervicl‘l ;"

DIED. tbefi' ``r`
Yesterday se'nnight, at Syston Park; near" Otan V
81 years, Sir John Thorol, Bart. f si,
College,
0n Saturday last, the Rev.-Thomas Tyrrell, c
College, Oxford. '