The Sun.
London, England, 1841-11-17 00:00:00

NOMINATION OF SHERIFFS FOR

42d Foot—Lieut. T. Kinlock to be Captain, by purchase,
vice Ramsay, who retires; Ensign F. Wade to be Lieut., by
purchase' vice Kinlock, Nov. i 6; Lieut. G. M. Ross, from
the 57th Foot, to be Lieutenant, vice Wade, appointed to the
98th Foot, Nov. 17 ; J. 0. Barnett, Gent., to be Ensign, by
purchase, vice Wade, Nov. 16.
46th Foot—Lieutenant W. Peacock to be Captain, by pur-
hese, vice Wharton, who retires ; Ensign P. B. Bicknell to
se Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Peacock; G. C. Fitzgerald,
Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Bicknell, Nov. 16.
47th Foot—J. Peacock, Gent, to be Ensign, by purchase,
vice Domville, appointed to the 29th Foot, Nov. 16.
58th Foot—Captain L. J. Westropp, from half-pay 95th
Foot, to be Captain, vice R. Hutton, who exchanges ; Lieu-
tenant C. L. Nugent to be Captain, by purchase, vice
Westropp, who retires ; Ensign I. R. Cooper to be Lieutenant,
by purchase, vice Nugent ; Second Lieutenant L. J. Thomp-
son, from the 21st Foot, to be Ensign, vice Cooper, Nov. 16.
60th Foot—Captain T. Crombie-to be Major, by purchase,
vice Fitz Gerald, who retires; Lieutenant W. Everard to be
Captain, uy purchase, vice Crombie ; Second Lieutenant 'l'.
S. Armstrong to be First Lieutenant, by purchase, vice
Everard ; E. Bellairs, Gent., to be Second Lieutenant, by
purchase, vice Armstrong. Nov. 16.
84th Foot—Capt. M. Day. from the 20th Foot, to be Cap-
tain, vice M'Calt, who exchanges, Nov. 16.
65,h Foot—Lieut. J. Blackburn,- to be Captain, by purchase,
vice Hamilton, who retires ; Ensign W. W. Maunsell, to be
Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Blackburn ; W. Williamson,
Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Maunsell, Nov. 16.
89th Fcot--Lieut. J. Walker to be Captain by purchase,
vine O'Malley, who retires; Ensign E. H. Maxwell to be Lieu-
tenant by purchase, vice Walker; R. J. Mgood, Gent., to be
Ensign, by purchase, vice Maxwell, Nov. 16.
92d Foot—Ensign W. Dalzell to be Lieutenant, without
purchase, vice Gordon, deceased, Aug. 28 ' • Ensign G. G. H,
Johnstone to be Lieutenant, without pnrchaie, Nov. 16.
To be Ensigns' without purchase—Sergeant-Major D.
M•Queen, vice Davies, deceased, Nov. 14; E. P. Mann,
Gent., vice Dalzell, Nov. 15 ; A. Macdonald, Gent., vice H.
Johnstone, Nov. 16.

THE YEAR ENSUING.

(From the London Gazette of Last Night.)
The names of those who were nominated for Sheriffs
by the Lords of the Council, at the Exchequer, on the
morrow of St. Martin, in the Fifth year of the Reign of
Queen Victoria, and in the year of our Lord One
Thousand Eight Hundred and Forty-one
Bedfordshire.—William Sutcliffe, of Great Braming-
ham, Esq. ; John Lee, of Sharmbrooke, Esq. ; Robert
Lindsell, of Fairfield-house, Esq.
Berkshire.—Sir Robert Throckmorton, of Buckland-
house, Bart. ; Henry Mill Bunbury, of Marlston, Esq. ;
and Edwin Martin Alkins, of Kingstone Lisle, Esq.
Bucks.—John Palmer of Dorney Court, Esq.; James
Trevor Senior, of Boughton-house, Aylesbury, Esq.; and
John Barnes, of Chorley Wood, Esq.
Cambridge and Huntingdonshires.—John Lurton, of
Stirtloe, Esq. ; John Beaufoy Rooper, of Abbots Ripon,
Esq. ; and Steed Girdlestone, of Sibson-cum-Stebbring-
ton, Esq.

Cumberland.—Fletchvifle Lawson Ballantyne Dykes.
of Daventry-hall, ESq.; Robert Hodgson, of Salkeld,
Esq. ; and George Harrison, of Linchwaite, Esq.
Cheshire.—James 'Walthall Hammond, of Wistaston.,
Esq.; Edward Davies Davenport, of Capesthorne, Esq.;
and John Dixon, of Astle-park, Esq.
CormcalL—Sir William Molesworth, of Pencarrow,
Bart.; Richard Spry, of Place, Esq. ; and William
Marshall, of Troworgey, Esq.
Derbyshire.—William Mundy, of Markeaton, Esq. ;
Thomas Pares, of Hopwell, Esq. ; and James Sutton,
of Shardlaw, Esq.
Devonshire.—William John Clarke, of Buckland,
Esq. ; John erotica Bulteel, of Fleet, Esq. ; and Em-
manuel Lousada, of Peak-house, Esq.
Dorsetshire.—Henry Ker Seymour, of Hanford, Esq.
John Mansell, of Srnedmore, Esq.; and James Charles
Dale, of Granrills Wootten, Esq.
Durham.—Robert Eden Duncombe Shafto, of Whit-
worth Park, Esq.; Cuthbert Elleson, of Hebburn Hall,
Esq. ; and Edgard Shepperdson, of Durham, Esq.
Essex.—John Faithful Fortescue, of Writtle Lodge,
Esq.; Henry John Conyers, of Copt Hall, Epping, Esq.;
and Sta nes Brocket Brocket, of Spains-hill, of Willin-
gall Spain, ESq.
Gloucestershire.—Thomas Henry Kingscote, of Kings-
cote, Esq.; Edward Hopkins, of Edgworth, Esq.; and
Joseph Yorke, of Forthamton Court, Esq.
Herefordshire.—John Lucy Scudamore, of Kent-
church Park, Esq.; the Hon. Thomas Harley Rodney,
of Borrington; and Sir James Kyrle Money, of hone•
house, Bart.

To be Adjutant—Lieut. D. Mackenzie, vice Sutherland,
promoted, Nov. 16.

94th Foot—Captain R. M. Beebee, from the 4011 Foot,
to be Captain, vice Longworth, who exchanges, August 27.
95th boat—G. Hicks, Gent., to be En.ign, by purchase,
vice Craigil, promoted in the 7th Foot, Nov. 16.
98th Font.--To be Lieutenants without purchase—Lieu-
tenant and Quartermaster W. H. Rogers, from the 95th
Foot; Lieutenant F. Shelton, from the 44th Foot, Nov. 16 ;
Lieut. T. F. Wade, from the 42d Foot, Nov. 17.
To be Lieutenant, by purchase—Ensign P. F. Hussey,
vice Rogers, who retires, Nov. 18.
To be Ensign, by purchase—A. F. Steele, Gent., vice
Hussey, Nov. 18.
To be Assistant-Surgeon—E. H. Blake, M.D., Nov. 16.
3d West India Regiment—Lieut. D. Cooper, from the 17th
Foot, to be Captain, without purchase, vice Nieolay, appointed
to the 29th Foot, Nov. 16 ; Captain P. Hennessey, from the
hall-pay Unattached, to be Captain, vice Cooper, appointed to
the 17th Foot, Nov. 17.
UNATTACHED.—Lieutenant J. B. Wheatstone, from the
53d Foot, to be Captain, without purchase, Nov. 16.
HosrtrAL STAFF.—D. Kennedy, M.D. to be Assistant-
Surgeon to the Forces, vice Boyle, deceased, Nov. 5.
BREVET.—To be Lieutenant-Colonel in the Army—Brevet
Major L. J. Westropp, of the 58th Foot, Jan. 10, 1837.
To be Majors in the Army—C. L. J. Westrepp, of the 58th
Foot, July 19, 1821 ; Captain R. B. Wolseley, of the 41st
Foot, June 28, 1838; Lieutenant W. F. Hay, Adjutant of the
East India Company's depot at Chatham, to have the tempo-
rary rank of Lieutenant in the Army while so employed,
Nov. 16.

Hertfordshire.—George Gould Morgan, of Brieken-
donbury, Esq.; John Bennet Lures, of Rethampstead,
Esq.; and Thomas Plumer Halsey, of Temple Dinsley,
Esq.

Kent.—Henry Hoare, of Staplehurst, Esq. ; Frederick
Perkins, of Chipitead, Esq.; and the Hon. George King.
of Ansley.
Leicestershire.—John Bambridge Storey, of Locking-
ton, Esq.; Sir Willoughby Wolston Dixie, of Bosworth
Park, Bart.; and Archibald Henry Algernon St. Maur,
Esq., commonly called Lord Archibald Henry Algernon
St. Maur, of Burton-on-the-Wolds.

Lincolnshire.—Sir John Nelthorpe, of Scawby, Bart. ;
Georwe Hussey Packe, of Cay-thorpe, Esq.; and the Hon.
Charles Thomas Clifford, of tinhorn, Lancashire.
Monmouthshire.—John Etherington Welsh Rolls, of
the Liendre, Esq. ; William Hunter Little, of Upper
Panty Goytre, Esq. ; and William Philips, of Wilston
House, Esq.
Norfolk.—William Howe Windham, of Felltrig, Esq.;
William George Tyssen Daniel Tyssen, of Fouldeo,
Esq.; and Sir John Peter Boileau, of Ketteringham, Bart.
Northamptonshire.—Robert Sackett Tomlins, of Fo-
theringay Castle, Esq. ; Langham Rokeby, of Arking-
worth, Esq. ; and Allen Allicoche Young, of Orlong-
bury, Esq.
Sorthumberland. William Tlodgson Cadogan, of
Brinkburn Priory, Esq. ; Edward Riddell, of Chees-
burn Grange, Esq. ; and William Cuthbert, of Bean-
front, Esq.
Nottinghamshire.—Francis Wright, of Lenton Hall,
Esq. ; Thomas Dickenson Hall, of Whatton, Esq.; and
Charles Paget, of Ruddington, Esq.
Oxfordshire.—John Shawe Phillips, of Culham, Esq.;
William Henry Vanderstegen, of Cane End House, Ca-
versham, Esq. ; and Walter Strickland, of Cokethorp
Park, Esq.
Butlandshire.—Richard Westbrook Baker, of Cottes-
more, Esq. ; George Fludyer, of Ayston, Esq. ; Henry
Richard Watson, of Caklicot, Esq.
Shropshire.—Henry Justice, of Hinstock, Esq. ; Sir
Andrew Vincent Corbett, of Acton Reynold, Bart. ; St.
John Chirerton Charlton, of Apley Castle, Bart.
Somersetshire.—Robert Charles Tudway, of the city
of Wells, Esq. ; Robert Farthing Beauchamp, of West
Monkton, Esq. ; the Hon. Philip Pleydell Bouverie, of
Brymore, Esq.
Staffordshire.—Charles Smith Forster, of Walsall,
Esq.; John Edward Piercy, of Worley Hall, Esq. ; Henry
Goodrick Willet, of Lightwood House, Esq.
County of Southampton.—George Henry Ward, of
Northwood Park, Isle of Wight, Esq. ; John Coventry,
of Burgate, Esq. ; William Hughes Hughes, of Hyde,
Isle of Wight, Esq.
Suffolk.—Edward Bridgman, of Coney Weston, Esq. ;
William Long, of Saxmundham, Esq. ; Sir Philip Broke,
of Nacton, Bart.

ERRATUM in the " Gazette" of Sept. 17, 1841.—Rifle Bri-
g3de—For Sir Henry T3rwhitt " Jones," Bart., to bo Second
Lieutenant, read, Sir Henry " Tyrwhitt," Bart., to be Second
Lieutenant.

Commissions by the Lord Lieutenant of Ross-shire.
J. J. R. MacKenzie, Esq., jun., to be Deputy Lieutenant,
Nov. 12.

The following places have been duly registered for solemniz-
ing marriages therein, pursuant to the Act 6th and 7th William
IV., chap. 85.
Salem Chapel, Sedbergh, Yorkshire.
The Baptist Chapel, New Mahon, Yorkshire.
DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY.

GEORGE HUDSON, nctualler, St. Peter the Apostle,
Isle of Thanet, Kent.

BANKRUPTS.

ROBERT ROBERTS, wine-merchant, Gower-street
North, to surrender Nov. 23, at half-past eleven, and Dee.
23, at twelve, at the Coat of Bankruptcy. Whitmore, Ofi-
cial assignee ; Wal:s and Son, Hart-street, Bloomsbury.
WILLIAM STRAKER, bookseller, West Strand, Nov.
23, at half-past one, and Dec. 28, at one, at the Court of
Bankruptcy. Gibson, official assignee, Basinghall.streot ;
Hopkinson, Red Lion-square.
THOMAS MORTON JONES, merchant, Yardley, Wor-
cestershire. Nov. 26, and Dec. 23, at two, at the Waterloo-
rooms, Birmingham. Rowland and Young, White Lion-
court, Cornhill, London ; Tyndall and Son, Birmingham.
JAMES CROFT, dyer, Apperley-bridge, Leeds, York-
shire, Nov. 24, and Dec. 28, at ten, at the Commissioners'-
rooms, Leeds. Walker, Furnival's Inn, London ; Blackburn,
Leeds.

WILLIAM EMANS, bookseller, Aldersgate-street, Nov.
30, and Dec. 28, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Tur-
quand, Copthall-buildings, official assignee ; Nortons, New-
street, Bishopsgate.
GEORGE BARRETT, butcher, Ecclesfield, Yorkshire,
Dec. 1 and 28, :t twelve, at the Town-hall, Sheffield. Bran-
son, Sheffield ; Moss, Cloak-lane. London.
GEORGE BUGG, builder, Exmouth street, Clerkenwell,
Nov. 23, at half-past twelve, and Dec. 28, at twelve, at the
Court of Bankruptcy. Belcher, official assignee ; King, Win-
chester-buildings, Great Winchester-street.
THOMAS HILL, jun., and WILLIAM BROOKES,
merchants, St. Mary Axe, Nov. 24, at two, and Dec. 28, at
eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Johnson, official assignee,
Ilasinghall- street ; Fisher, Bucklersbury.
HENRY GREVES, timber-merchant, Warwick, Nov.
22, and Dec. 24, at the Lansdowne Hotel, Leamington Priors.
Cary, St. Swithin's-lane, London; Kitchin, Warwick.
FRANCIS BRITTAN, woollen-draper, Bristol, Nov. 27,
and Dec. 28, at eleven, at the Commissioners' Rooms, Man-
chester. Makinson and Sanders, Middle Temple, London ;
Atkinson and Saunders, Norfolk-street, Manchester.

Surrey.—Charles Barclay, of Bury-hill, Esq. ; Richard
Sumner, of Puttenham Priory, Esq. ; and William Stra-
chan, of Ashurst, Esq.
Sussex.—George Wyndham, of Petworth, Esq.; Mus-
grove Briscoe, of Coghurst, Esq. ; and Edward Hussey,
of Scotney Castle, Esq.
Warwickshire.—John Little, of Newbold Pacey, Esq.;
Arthur Francis Gregory, of Stivic-hall, Esq.; and
Charles Newdgate Newdgate, of Arbury, Esq.
13 Wiltshire.—Frederick William Booke, of Lackham-
house, Esq. ; Henry Stephen Olivier, tf Potterne, Esq.;
George Edward, of Warrens, in the parish of Banes-
ham, Esq.
Worcestershire.—William Robins, of Hagley, Esq.;
Edward Holland, of Linchwick, Esq.; Francis Rufford,
of Prescot, Esq.
Yorkshire.—William St. Quintin, of Scampston-hall,
Esq.; Sir Joseph William Copley, of Sprotborough,
Bart.; Sir William Bryan Cooke, of Wheatley, Bart.

ANTHONY MORLAND SOULBY, wine-merchant,
Saint Mary'-at-Hill, Nov. 23, at half past twelve, and Dec. 28,
at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Green, Alderman-
bitty, official assignee ; Ogden, St. Mildred's Court, Poultry.
EDWARD MOUNTFORD and FREDERICK MOUNT-
' FORD, drapers, Bath, Nov. 26, and Dec. 28, at eleven, at
the Court of Bankruptcy. Groom, official assignee, Abchurch-
lane, Lombard-street; Ashurst, Cheapside.
MILES COE, laceman, Goldsmith-street, Wood-street,
Cheapside, Nov. 24, at three, and Dec. 23, at twelve, at the
Court of Bankruptcy. Lackington, Coleman-street-build-
ings, official assignee ; Carter and Gregory, Lord Mayor's
Court—office.

A List of Gentlemen qualified to serve the office of
Sheriffs for the several Counties in the Principality of
Wales, for the year 1842 :
Anglesey.—John Sanderson, of Aberbraint, Esq. ;
Humphrey Herbert Jones, of Llynon, Esq. ; George
Anson Walker, of Meriogan, Esq.
______

Brecknockshire.—Rowel Joneis Williams, of Coity
Mawr, Esq.; Howel Gwyn, of Abercrave, Esq.; Walter
Ma bury, of Brecon, Esq.
Carnarvonshire.—John Griffith Watkins, of Plas Llan-
fair, Esq.; John Lloyd Jones, of Degan'vy, Esq. ; Ro-
bert Williames Vaughan, of Plasnewydd, Esq.
Carmarthenshire.—James Gwynne Holford, of Sit-
gwyn, Esq. ; William Phillips, of Wagngron, Esq.
Cardiganshire.—Francis David Saunders, of Tymawr,
Esq. ; James Davies, of Trevechan, Esq. ; Alban Thos.
Davies, of Tyglyn, Esq.
Denbighshire.—Henry Warter Meredith, of Pentre-
bychan, Esq.; Thomas Molyneux Williams, of Pendedw
Hall, Esq.; Thomas Parry Jones Parry, of Llwynynn
Hall, Esq.
Flintshire.—The Hon. Lloyd Kenyon, of Gredington
Ellesmere; Edward Dymock, of Penley Hall, Ellesmere,
Esq.; James Wills, of Plas Bellin, Northop, Esq.
Glimorganshire.—Henry Lucas, of Uplands, Esq. ;
Rowland Fothergill, of Hensol Castle, Esq.; Thomas
William Booker, of Velindra, Esq.
Merionethshire.—Sir William Wynn, of Hendre-
gwenllian, Knight ; the Hon. Thomas Pryce Lloyd, of
Mochras; Edward Griffith, of Gwastadryn, Esq.
Montgomeryshire.—Sir John Roger Kynaston, of Hard-
wick Hall, Bart. ; John Owen, of Broadway, Esq. ; Sir
John Conroy, of Plasypennant, Bart.
Pembrokeshire.—John Harding Herries, of Trevacoon,
Esq.; Robert Frederick Gower, of Glandovan, Esq.;
Charles Cook Wells, of Tenby, Esq.
Radnorshire.—Francis Phillips, of Abbey Cwmhir,
Esq.; David Oliver, of Rhydoldocr, Esq.; The Hon.
Edward Randall Plunkett, of Brynerrynog.

JOHN CROWTHER and JOHN BUTTERWORTH,
black beer brewers, Leeds, Nov. 24 and Dec. 28, at two,
at the Commissioners'-rooms' Leeds. Wilson, Southampton-
street, Bloomsbury ; Payne, Eddison, and Ford, Leeds.

LEOPOLD NEUMEGEN, bookseller, Highgate, Dec. 1
and 28, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Johnson, Basing-
hall-street, official assignee; Davis, Charlotte-street, Bed-
ford-square.
GEORGE TURK, saddler, Cheltenham, Nov. 26 and
Dec. 28, at twelve, at the Royal Hotel, Cheltenham. Stiles,
Cheltenham ; Carter and Lindell, Raymond-buildings, Gray's
lnn, London.

JOHN NIGHTINGALE, innkeeper, rtusholme, Lanca-
shire, Sow. 27 and Dec. 28, at twelve, at the Commissioners'-
rooms, Manchester. Creswell, Manchester ; and Gibson,
Manchester; Chesholme, Hale, and Gibson, Lincoln's Inn-
fields, London.

WILLIAM 111ORG AN, bookseller, Longdon, Staffordshire,
Dec. 1, at one, and Dec. 28, at twelve, at the Swan Hotel.
Lichfield. Tatham, Staple Inn, London; Eggington, Lichfield.
WILLIAM LISTER, cloth manufacturer, Roldcy, York-
shire, Nov. 24, and Dec. 28, at twelve, at the Commercial-
buildings, Leeds. Walker, Fttrnival's Inn, London ; Black-
burn, Leed3.

FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZETTE.
WAR-OFFICE, Nov. 16, 1841.

let Regiment of Life Guards—Cornet and Sub-Lientenan
J. Farrer to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Duncombe, who
retires ; R. Sutton, Gent. to be Cornet and Sub-Lieutenant,
by purchase, vice Farrer, Nov. 15.
Ist Regiment of Dragoon Guards—Gentleman Cadet J. M.
P. Child, from the Royal Military College, to be Cornet, by
purchase, vice Fleming, promoted in the 7th Foot, Nov. 16.
3d Regiment of Light Dragoons—Cornet H. Wood to be
Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Wytt, who retires ; T. Penton,
Gent., to be Cornet, by purchase, vice Wood, Nov. 16.
6th Regiment of Dragoons—Gentleman Cadet H. B. Leigh,
from the Royal Military College, to be Cornet, by purchase,
vice Parker, who retires, Nov. 16.
7th Regiment of Foot—Ensign R. C. Craigie, from the 95th
10th Foes—Ensi
Foot, to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Brooke, who retires;
Cornet A. C. C. Fleming, from the Ist Dragoon Guards, to
be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Brandling,who retires, Nov. 16.
Ensign, by -
vice K. L. gn J. J. Bull to be Lieutenant, by purchase,
lirThomas,h who retires ; M. V. Bull, Gent., to be
chase,
14th l'otP, Irene, vice J. J. Bull, Nov. 16.
vice Wilson, who retires ; Ensign T. E. Holmes to he
Gent., to be b{, purchase,
t. C. Leventhorpe to be Captain, by pur-
Lieutenant, b
17th Foot—Cag D' cooper, vice Leventhorpe; H. Fit3gerald,
Eoo,urchase, vice Holmes, Nov. 16.
Capp
vice ter, from the 3d West India Reg,i-
ment, to be
17awrence Fyfe, who retires upon
half-pay Unattached, Nov,
19th Foot—Lieut. J. M'Clintoe k from half-pay of the 88th
Foot, to be Lieutenant, vice WalAshiensergh, appointed Paymaster of
a , to be Lieutenant,
the 2d Foot ; Ensign R. J. S.
by purchase, vice M'Clintock, who
retires; Ensign A. P.
Atherley, from the 30th Foot, to b Ensign, vice Mansergh,
•
16. Foot—Capt. G. 11I'Call, from the 84th Foot, to be
Captain,
pvi
sa
ti nF,ovoi
tclDEa.
f,•bmoi
cecanc,hGa ?nets.
t 0 Nov.b• Secondl6 Lieutenant,.
by purchase, vice Thompson, appointed to the 58th Foo.
November 16.
23<1 Foot—Lieut. F. Torrens to bo Captain, by purchase,
vice Movir.s, who retires; Second• Lieutenant the Hon. F.sJ:
R. Villiers to be First Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Torrensx•
J. Isham Routh, Gent., to be Second Lieutenant, by pur:
obese, vice Villiers Nov. 3.
27th Foot—Major M. C. Johnstone to be LieUtenant-Colo-
nel, by purchase, vice M'Pherson, who retires; Captain It
Fawkes to he Major, vice Johnstone ; Lieut. T. P. 'f ouzel to
be Captain, by purchase, vice Fawkes ; Ensign B. Tunnard to
be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Touzcl; F. C. Herring,
Gent. to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Tunnard, Nov. 16.
•
29th Foot—Ensign G. H. M. Jones to be Lieutenant, by
Gerard, who retires ; Ensign C. C. W. Dom-
purchase, vice
ville, from the 47th Foot, to be Ensign, vice Jones, Nov. 16.
30th Foot—J. Rose, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice
Foot
40th Foot—Captain D. F. Longworth, from the 94 h t
,
Atherley, appointed to the 19th Foot, Nov. 16.
to he Captain, vice Beebee, who exchanges, Aug. 27.
41st Foot.—Captain R. B. Wolseley, from half-pay of the
22d Light Dragoons, to be Captain, vice A. Hook, who ex-
changes; Lieutenant W. May to be Captain, by purchase,
vice Wolseley, who retires ; Ensign C. T. Tuckey to be Lieu-
tenant, by purchase, vice May, Nov. 16 ; Ensign J. Madden to
be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Browne, who retires, Nov. 17;
C. F. Edwards, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice
Tuckey, Nov. 16 ; T. Rawlins, Gent., to be Ensign, by pur-
chase, vice Madden, Nov. 17.

JOHN LEWIS, coal master, Hockley Colliery, Sedgley,
Staffordshire, Dec. 1, and Dec. 28, at ten, at the Swan Hotel,
Wolverhampton. Brown, Baton, Staffordshire; Williamson
and Hill, Verulam-buildings, Gray's Inn.
PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED.
W. Dennis and C. Taylor, tobacconists, Eyre-street-hill,
Leather-lane—NV. Elliott and J. Rogers, bat manufacturers,
Charles-street,;Blackfriars-road—J. North seri., and J. North,
jun., lace manufacturers, Woodhouse Eaves, Leicestershire—
J. Aitken and E. Hawkins, boot makers, High Harrogate,
Yorkshire—J. Lovell, H. W. Down, and G. Rood, skin ma-
nufacturers, Baltonsbcrough, Somersetshire (so far as regards
H. W. Down)—S. `Swindel and J. Bulbeek, linen drapers,
Hipperholme, Yor'Ashire—T. Balmer and R. Goolden, water
carriers, Welchpcol, Montgomeryshire—J. Took and W. Beales,
nurserymen, Li Ale Dunham, Norfolk—J. L. Foster, G. J.
Lloyd, and P. B. Teulon, attorneys, Fish-street-hill, City—J.
Walker and J. Wadsworth, dyers, Leeds, Yorkshire—J. E.
Piper and T. Cooper, chemists, Upper East Smithfield—A.
and T. Sce.ithwell, grocers, Brigdnorth, Shropshire—W. Rowe
and T. Green, steel pen manufacturers, Birmingham—H. W.
Ruel, T. Jones, C. F. W. Ruel, and G. E. Jones, sweep
washers, Goswell-street—J. and D. Caparn, chemists, Horn-
castle, Lincolnshire—A. Spoor, sen. and A. Spoor, jun.,
builders, Newcastle-upon-Tyne—A. Bowker, E. Bowker, and
M. Bowker, brewers, Pendleton, Lancashire—C. Dod and H.
Bent, ship brokers, London—G. C. Welsford and J. Gibson,
coal merchants, Weymouth, Dorset shire—W. Taylor and W.
H. Mackenzie, coal dealer?, Birkenhead, Cheshire—J. Peat,
J. Airey, H. Blake, and J. Moss, ship-builders, Maryport.

SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS.
MATTHEW HALL, merchant, Troon, Nov. 19 and Dec.
10, at one, at the Portland Arms Inn, Troon.
JAMES KNOX, Silverbuthall, Nov. 22 and Dec. 10, at
twelve, at the Tower Inn, Hawick.
HEDDERWICK and RANKIN, ship-builders, Glasgow,
Nov. 22 a.nd Dec. 13, at twelve, at the Office of J. Monteith,
Glasgow.

BIRTH OF THE PRINCE OF WALES.—
With feelings of the most unqualified pleasure we con-
gratulate our readers and the public upon the birth of
the heir-apparent to the Throne of these realms—an
event of the most gratifying description in it-
self, as the consummation of a nation's wish,
and not less so as filling up the measure of
her Gracious Majesty's happiness. If anything were
needed to add "to the general joy," it would be found in
the gratifying assurances of the excellent state of the
Royal health. For these propitious events, the voice of
a grateful people will ascend in accents of praise and
thankfulness to that Almighty Power who vouchsafes in
so eminent a degree to bless this favoured land. The
promulgation of the joyful news has been received in
every part of the kingdom with an enthusiasm which
has nut been equalled since the period of her Majesty's
Accession ; it was responded to in this borough, as well
as in the chief towns of the coanty, with reiterated peals
on all the parish bells, and the usual manifestations of
loyalty.—We have to express our thanks to the pro-
prietors of The Sun for the copies of their Journal,
which we were enabled, by their exertions, to circulate
and exhibit to the public, soon after three o'clock, p.
on Tuesday. This paper has for a considerable time
established itself as the earliest channel of important
news, and for the extraordinary despatch with which it
conveys information to the most remote parts of the
kingdom.—Reading Mercury.
PRUSSIC ACID.—A servant maid, aged 15,
was ordered to destroy a cat with prussic acid ; she ac-
cordingly purchased half an ounce of that deadly poison,
and proceeded to administer a part of it to the poor
animal, which it instantly killed. But the effects upon
the girl were almost fatal, the inhalation of the vapour
of this very volatile poison having given rise to sudden
stupor, which was followed by delirium, and a most
ffightful degree of prostration of the vital powers. She
was immediately placed under the care of Mr. N. Smith,
by whose exertions in the course of a few days she was
so far restored as to bear removal to the Infirmary,
where she now lies in an improving condition, under the
care of Dr. Prichard.--Bristol Mirror.

BAIL

THE SUN, LONDON. WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17. 1841.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
ROLLS' COURT, Nov. 16.
ATTORNEY-GENERAL 1). PRETTYMAN.
Mr. PEMBERTON stated this was an information filed
by the Attorney-General at the instance of the Charity
Commissioners against the Bishop of Lincoln and the
Dean and Chapter of the diocese for maladministration
of certain charitable trusts. In the year 1243, Simon
de Roget, founded and endowed an hospital on his manor,
in the diocese of Lincoln, for the maintenance of I
poor persons, andsa chapelwarden. The hospital had
now disappeared, and all that had remained of Into year:
of the charity was, that the rents of all lands were col-
lected by the chapelwarden, who paid 24/. per annum
among six poor persons, and appropriated 81. per annum
to himself. The real value of the property, however,
consisted of fines, which were appropriated by the pre-
sent chapelwarden, and, as he alleged, by his prede-
cessors to his own use. In the year 1816, the present
chapelwarden, Dr. Prettyman, was appointed by Lis
father the Bishop of Lincoln, and the estate was then
held by a gentleman named Manby. In July,
1817, the lease being partly expired, applicatio:i
was made to Dr. Prettyman to renew it, to which he
replied that he declined to do so, but was ready to treat
for the purchase of Mr. Manby's interest. This, how-
ever, Mr. Manby declined to part with, and continued to
hold it until his death, when it devolved on Major Cot-
grave.' On that occasion the lease was renewed ,for
term of 99 years, for which a fine was paid of 9,247/. In
1825 the lease was again renewed at a fine of 2;300/,
and in 1831 it was again renewed at a fine of 1,0001. So
that the sum received by this gentleman for fines
amounted to the sum of nearly 13,0001. In the year
1835 the Charity Commissioners applied to the Dean
and Chapter, who were in possession of the foundation
dead, for the production of the documents in their pos-
session relating to the foundation, and the defendant Dr.
Prettyman, who was a member of that body, admitted,
in his answer, that in consequence of his advice they
positively refused to produce it. The production of the
document, however, had been compelled, and it was
now admitted that this was a loendati©n for the
benefit of thirteen poor persons, who were to re-
side in the hospital, and that the chapelwarden
was entitled to no more than a fair remuneration for the
performance of his duty. In addition to the largo sum
received for fines, the chapelwarden had cut down
timber of the valae of several hundreds of pounds ; and
it now remained for his Lordship to say what species
of relief the Court would administer to the charity. He
thought the charity was entitled to ask fur the principal
sum that had been received, and to be placed in the same
situation as if the same annual value had been reserved
in the last lease granted, and that the lease should be
considered as adopted for the benefit of the charity at
the time the ',Commissioners investigated the subject ;
but, at least, ha asked that the amount of the principal
meney received for fines and timber should be restored.
Then a scheme was to be considered for the application
of the fund, and he would suggest that an hospital should
be built, and that it should be otherwise appropriated,
according to the intentions of the founder.
Mr. KINDERSLEY, on behalf of Dr. Prettyman, said
that undoubtedly the foundation deed was very explicit,
as to the mode in which the intentions of the foun-
der were to be carried out ; but Dr. Prettyman
was only pursuing the course of his predecessors, who
had received thtefines for many years back, and who, of
course, had believed that he was entitled to them, but
who, with regard to the future, was willing to submit
to such directions as his Lordship should think fit to
make. But for the fines received since his appointment,
which he had received as a matter of • emolument, he
thought the Court would hardly go back to them beyond
the time when the attention of Dr. Prettyman was, of
course, for the first time called to the subject by the
Charity Commissioners. If he had received any subse-
quently, a different consideration might be applied to
them, but with respect to the others he would submit to
the Court that the six poor persons were not in existence
who could have received any benefit from them.
The MASTER of the Roees—Froni the titre Dr.
Prettyman was informed of this has he been prompt in
setting himself right and in restoring the charities ? I
own I strongly feel that when a breach of trust is acci-
dentally discovered, and the person who has been in-
nocently, though improperly, in possession comes for-
ward promptly to set the matter right, that the Court
should deal as leniently with him as possible ; but
when he contends for his right after the truth has been
discovered, it is a very different thing.
Mr. KINDERSLEY said it did not appear that the truth
was discovered, nor that the document was forthcoming.
He admitted that the refusal to produce it was impru-
dent ; but many an innocent person, when he found a
claim made on what he had supposed to be his property,
was naturally unwilling to assist in depriving himself of
it. With regard to the timber, he submitted that the
money received for that was no more than the ordinary
profits arising from the premises. He submitted that
they ought not to go back beyond the investigation by
the Commissioners, and that the Court should direct an
inquiry as to the application of the fund.
Mr. LOFTUS WIGRAM. on the same side, said that it
had been repeatedly directed by the Court in cases
similar to the present, when a long period had
elapsed, during which a party had innocently
misapplied a charitable fund through the 'aches of others
—that was, through none of the public setting him
right—not to call upon him to account for a longer period
than that at which the misapplication of the fund had
been discovered. If it could be shown that the public
had told Dr. Prettyman that he had no right, or if the
Dean and Chapter, who were visitors of the charity,
had told him that the allowance to the poor ought to be
increased, the case would have been different ; but until
some circumstances of this kind was charged against
him, he did not see how his Lordship could consider
him otherwise than in the light of RR innocent party.
The Learned Gentleman then cited the Attorney-Ge-
neral v. the Mayor of Newport, 3 Milne and Keane 650;
the Brentwood school case, Ist Milne and Keane; and
the Attorney-General v. the Archbishop of York. He
hoped his Lordship would at least make a distinction
between charging the defendant with all he had received,
and with what might have been considered a sufficient
provision for the charity. The foundation on which it stood
directed that houses for 13 poor persons should be
kept up, and that if other benefactions were made to it,
the number should be increased. In the present case
there had been no additional benefactions, but merely an
increase in the value of the lands. Under these circum-
stances, he hoped his Lordship would think that relief
ought not to be granted, except by making the defen-
dant pay what he might have received wince the Charity
Commissioners had called his attention to the subject.
A Learned Gentleman appeared for the Bishop of the
diocese, and exhibited his right of patronage.
Mr. BARLOW, for the Dean and Chapter, appeared to
submit to the direction of the Court, and applied for the
costs of his clients. He submitted that it was not fair to
allege against them, as had been done, that they had
thrown obstructions in the Way of the charity. They
had not exercised their patronage for four hundred
years, but it had been exercised all that time by the
'Bishop of Lincoln; and the Act of Parliament under
which the Commissioners acted; the Ist and 2d William
IV., c. 34, provides against their compelling the pro-
duction of any documents held by collegiate bodies.
Hs clients had been always willing to produce , the
documents in question to any person not claiming it as a
right, and he therefore submitted they were entitled to
their costs.
Mr. PEMBEBTON, in reply, said that the decisions of
his Lordship (Lord Langdale) -went further on this sub-
ject than any authorities that could be produced. In
this case he submitted that the chapelwarden had no
more right to cm down timber, or to claim the surplus
of that property than any of the objects of the charity,
of which he was one. He felt called upon to say a word
respecting the course pursued by the Dean and Chapter.
It was not to be supposed that; because the Act exone-
rated these bodies from the control of the Charity Com-
missioners, with respect to these bodies themselves, they
were, therefore, exonerated from their control when
they were trustees of charities, and justified in with-
holding documents relating to their trusts. There was
not the slightest doubt they were bound to produce the
legal documents of charities connected with their body,
and he hoped his Lordship would set them right upon
this subject. He did not assent to the proposition made
by his Learned Friend. The original division was a
sum of 32L among the objects of the charity, giving a
double share to the chapelwarden. He thought that at
least the charity ought to have the benefit of the lease
for 21 years now in existence, taken from the time the
Commissioners made their Report, and then he should be
dealing more leniently with the parties than perhaps the
Attorney-General would think he ought to deal. But
on the part of the Attorney-General, he should be con-
tent with whatever his Lordship might direct, but lie
thought his Lordship would feel that a party whose
conduct their Counsel did not attempt to defend, ought
not to receive the costs to which other parties were
entitled.
The MASTER of the ROLLS said in these eases, a great
deal must depend on the conduct of the defendant. He
would read the answer and see what it said about it. It
was a great mistake to suppose the Court had discretion
to determine the right of the parties. Its discretion was to
deal with the fines. This sum of money, beyond till doubt,
belonged to the charity ; but when a:Pparty innocently
in possession of trust money, on discovery of its
misapplication, carne forward and gave every
facility to the due application of the trust money, there-
after he had never thought it an improper exercise of the
discretion of the Court, to save him as much as possible
from a bygone account. He believed that from his
acting on that principle
great facility had been afforded
for the recovery of charity property, which otherwise
would have been lost. But the promptitude of the de-
fendant in setting the mutter right, was an important
element to the exerr.lese,
of the discretion of the Court.
It should not be for g atten that there were cases in which
the Court, however
had not thought it hard it might be on the parties,
right to act on the discretion which it
had at other times exorcised. There was a case in which
Lord Eldon himself had referred the matter to the At-
and had taken the benefit of his re'
it
no r
s-
iGdeenr
ienrga 1
de the
the
Dean and Chapter, by their Counsel, reproach
what Was to be done. In this cc t'""
Pret-
tyman, and Dr. Prettyman b his Couns,•,r, reproach
cannot be defended on
round that
the Dean and Chapter ; but the conduct
the latter
to it by Dr. Prettyman.
am onle ' then/were urged
singularity of parties repron% o. chin- I observing on the
which they seem to havedone a each other for acts
this case stand in the paper •
in perfect concert. Let
.or to-morrow.

on behalf of the
AL-- COURT, Nov. 16.
eldexhAarianbEenenv .
obtained
deflenndthainstcbayse-iv't
show cause 1 r* llagley calling upon the plaintiff to
case of r IrlY,ltul , ' .
eracnt should not be entered, as in
nons •
in;; be • tut, ..,
, ,en•
joilud iia,
ta not proceeding to trial, issue har-
l' - month of January last,
Ar Tim. this -ii • •
;1A a•rfilf. • 11 cause' • • t th
owe( against , e rule, and
-4,;_. thbt 0,1. e twireild
cauwas an insolvent debtor, who had
Aaken the benefit t the Act, but had been remanded for

twenty months for fraud. The debt for which this action
had been brought was fur 3001., money lent, and was in-
cluded in the schedule ; and the action had been brought
for the purpose of securing the detention of the defendant
for the time ordered by the Insolvent Court. lie sub-
mitted that, under the provisions of the Act of Victoria,
abolishing arrest on mesne process, the plaintiff was not
bound to proceed, and submitted • that the rule must be
discharged with costs.
Mr. BAGLEY, in support of the rule, contended that
the plaintiff, having known of the defendant's having
taken the benefit of the Act, had no right to take any of
these proceedings, after such a fact had come to his
knowledge, and therefore submitted that the rule must

be made—absolute.
Mr. Justice PaTTEsosr said that there seemed to be
some contradiction in the law on the subject. By the
41st section it was enacted that no party should be dis-
charged out of custody by judgment in case of a non-
suit
until such time as he should have remained in
prison the time ordered by the Court, and there seemed
to ba some contradiction between that and the 85th sec-
tion. The defendant, however, he was of opinion, had
no right to force the plaintiff on, and wider the circum-
stances he thought, perhaps, the best thing would be to
consent to stet processus.
Mr. BAGLEY would cons-alt his client on the subject.
VIE QUEEN V. TRAVIS.
Mr. TIATEs applied for a certiorari to remove the depo-
sitions in this case into this Court, and for a rule
nisi to admit the defendant to bail in the country.
It appeared that the prisoner had been committed by a
Magistrate of Lancashire, for felony, on a charge of wil-
fully and maliciously stabbing a horse. In the depositions
it appeared that the defendant was the son of a small
farmer, and was, with his father, working on his father's
farm, when Mr. Entwistle, who was out hunting, entered
Mr. Travis's grounds with his hounds, and accompanied
by sevsral persons. That hearing a noise of hounds, he
rode up to-the place from whence the noise proceeded, and
found the defendant attacking the hounds with a
pitchfork, with which he had been previously working,
and the huntsman remonstrating with him, and that Mr.
Entwistle said they were trespassing, and would get out
of the field as soon as 'they could, when the defendant
struck the pitchfork into. Mr. Entwistle's horse. On their
depositions Travis had been committed for febny. Now
he submitted that even on those depositions there was
no reason for committing the prisoner for felony, but
his affidavits showed that Mr. Entwistle had
frequently had notice not to trespass on the grounds of
Mr. Travis in his hunting excursions. That Travis had
repeatedly suffered from Mr. Entwistle's trespasses, and
that Entwistle had read and observed upon a notice
which Travis had put up warning persons not to trespass
on his farm. That on the morning in question Travis's
son had warned Entwistle not to trespass, and
that on hearing the noise Entwistle had rode
us) to the spot at a furious rate, had attempted to ride
lcavis down, who had held out his pitchfork in self-de-
fence, and that Entwistle had ridden against it.
Mr. Justice ParrEsosr—Take a certiorari, anti your
tide to show cause.—Application granted.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, Ncv. 16.

REFUSAL TO TARE AN OATH. -IN RE -- HOFFSTAEDT.

This was the day fixed for the adjourned examination
of the bankrupt, described as an india-rubber manufac-
turer, but who stated himself to be a g,eneral merchant.

It appeared from his several examinations that a few
years since he arrived in this country, and had several
places of residence in Billiter-street, Cloak-lane, Ste. That
he had made large purchases of almost every species of
goods, which he "consigned" to houses at Hamburgh and
Rotterdam, but he had produced no books to show what
they had realised, although one of the creditors (for 2001.)
stated positively there were two when the bankrupt was
making arrangements to effect a compromise with his
creditors. He had books of accounts in his possession,
but was unwilling to let the creditors know the names of
his consignees. He was to-day brought up in custody
from Whitecross-street prison, and in the course of his
examination one of the creditors' assignees requested
that the bankrupt should be sworn ; but he refused, on
the ground that he entertained religious opinions which
would not allow him to swear, and the Scriptures said,
" Swear not at all." _

Mr. Commissioner FONBLA,NQUE-0? what religious
persuasion aro you ? The Bankrupt—l am- a Roman
Catholic.
Mr. Commissioner FONBLANQUE—There is nothing in
the tenets of your faith as a Roman Catholic, nor in the
precepts of your church, which prohibits you from taking
an oath.
The Bankrupt—My religious principles forbid me to
swear, and I will not swear, Sir, so you may do with me
what you please.
Mr. Commissioner FONBLANQUE—You may tell your
client, Mr. Norton, that he must comply with the laws
of the country in which he is living, but not from any
force of conscience. It would be inconvenient to discuss
matters of theology in a Court like this, but if the oath
be pressed I have only ono duty to perform in the event
of the bankrupt's refusal to take it. Where are your
account books ? The Bankrupt--I do not know. I
have Vitnd tticniorandums, and I have done what I could
to make out my aceottlifM,
Mr. Commissioner FONBLANQUt —HaTe you any suspi-
cion of where the books are ? The Bankrupt—When I
left my lodgings in Cloak-lane I there ?eft my b''°ks ;
the landlady of the house might know some lung, but
that is all I know about the matter.

Mr. NORTON', for the bankrupt, prayed that a further
time might be given to render and complete his accounts,
as being confined within the walls of a prison he had
not had those facilities which he might have otherwise
enjoyed of making diligent search and inquiry as to his
books. With respect to the other part of the case, he
knew the power of the Court in the event of the bank-
rupt's refusal to take the required oath : and if he still per-
sisted in not taking it, he must submit to the consequences.
The bankrupt said that on previous examinations, be-
fore Mr. Commissioner Evans and Mr. Commissioner
Fane' his " affirmation " was taken, and he considered
that he would be under the same obligation as if he
were sworn.

Mr. JONES (solicitor to the assignees) said his clients
felt it their duty to press the bankrupt's being sworn ;
and, at all events, to adjourn the case sine die, as his ac-
counts were most unsatisfactory.
Mr. Commissioner FONDLANQUE—No ; upon a first
meeting of a final examination I never adjourn a bank-
rupt sine die, unless in cases of collusive bankruptcy.
In this case the bankrupt will find it a very difficult
thing to pass, and if ho were not already in custody I
should have taken a very different course ; but my
exercise of any further act of power is unnecessary.
This is one of a class of cases which requires great look-
ing after, and I am glad that the trade assignees are
doing their duty.
The bankrupt was then taken back in custody of an
officer to Whitecross-sireet prison.
The Official Assignee stated that the creditors were
not likely to receive a single penny of their claims.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
mil SION-HOUSE.
A Spaniard, named Jose Joaquiin Goncalva Baste,
was charged, on Monday, by the firm of Pinto, Perez,
and Co., No. 36, Crutched-friars, merchants, with bay-
ing obtained from thent bottle warrants, of the value of
5001, under false pretences.
Mr. Theodore F. Pinto stated that Mr. Baste called at
the house, and purchased sherry wines, for which he
was to pay upon delivery, to the amount of 700/. Upon
paying a deposit of 3001, Mr. Basto received part of the
wines to that amount by a transfer order on the St. Ka-
tharine's Docks, and subsequently he called to take the
rest of the wines, and, as witness supposed, to pay the
balance, as a matter of course. The money, however,
was not produced, and Mr. Baste was informed that the
agreement was that the wines could only be delivered
upon the discharge of the balance. He stated then that
he had sold the wines; that, if any delay took place, his
credit would be injured ; and that he had sold them
through the house of Mr. John Mitchell, of Old
Broad-street. This representation was accompanied by
assurances that the transfer order should be immediately
returned. Not wishing that the credit of Mr,
Basto should suffer, witness consented to give him the
transfer order for the remaining portion of the wines
upon that condition. This transaction took place on the
Friday, and at a late hour in the day, Mr. Basto called,
and stated that Mr. Mitchell would not accept the
transfer order, and would not be satisfied with anything
but the wine warrants theansolvesi and that if they were
produced everything would be ready in the morning.
Witness said he had no objection to let - Mr. Basta have
the wine warrants till next day, upon the assurance of
strict attention to the agreement. The wine warrants
were delivered, but, to the surprise of witness, Mr. Basto
did not make his appearance at the appointed time. It
was then considered neceseitry by the hrm to send one
clerk to the St. Katharine's Docks, to inquire about the
wine warrants,_ and another to the house a Mr. Mitchell,
to ascertain the nature of the transaction between that
gentleman and Mr. Basto. At both places the reports
were unfavourable, for the warrants had been brought to
the Docks, and Mr. Mitchell declared that he had had no
transactions with Mr. Baste for years.
The LORD MAYOR—You let Mr. Baste have the wine
warrants to show Mr. Mitchell that he was in possession
of the wines. Witness--Yes. I did not wish to do any
harm to his credit, and of course entertained no suspi-
cion as to the intention of Mr. Basto.
Mr. George Allan Mitchell, of the house Of John
Mitchell and to., of Xo. 9, Broad-street, stated that the
Atm had not recently had any transactions with Mr.
Basto. If Mr, Pa;:o nut. husjness will} the firm
lvit-
nem wouldknow the fact,
The Lottb MAYOR—Did Mr. ftasto lately call at your
house to offer wines for sale ? Witness—Not at all.
Mr. T. Ferricra Pinto—Mr, Baste said in his conver-
sation with me that the wines had been sold by a party
in the country. ,
Thr? L9RP., DIAYOR (to Mr. Mitchell)—Did you receive
am r'
ar fr'Jm the country, to pay for wines to Mr. Basto?
Nothine. of the kind occurred.
I The Loan Ilitiroß—Welr, Mr. Baste, what have you
to say to this charge sgainq
i Moto paid, that
having bought willed ?t a cneap rate a the house e:
Heasts rintio and Co., be went thither to ---,These
considerable quantity• • "... -•
* -
; and he said he wanted them for
a party in the country,. for the'porpose of getthig them
at as reasonable a
very much for a halal:ire? u possible. Ile was pressed
he asked a friend to assist
him.atthe time of
friendthe dealing, and '
accomplish the object assist
That could not
without having some authority
upon which to raise the cash, and he (Mr, Pinto) gave
bun the order to procure the temporary accommodation
upon them. Talniedrela Pinto s no intention whatever
thing wronrs,
had been made to to do any
get.
themoney would find
necessary
that attempts
to pay the
amount of the demand.
The T. A r
""`"I) ''.""C°ll—This is an ugly way of raising
stoney, Mr. Basto. Mr. Basto--I assure,you it is oat
what is
_called "raising the wind. y"
e LORD MAYOR—It is not the way to allay the
win'di believe
tic'.tic'.
Mitchell's Mr. Baste—l hive hae4dealings with
house and that and ofxher houses lovel
had confidence in me.