The Sun.
London, England, 1815-05-18 00:00:00

izlissatisfacon At yoirr bitnA•trct„" &c. tzc. VVe
Lave before us the mint te of et lettor from the
tipper/it to the king- of Naples; czt.'ttcl at Von'-
tainblean, the 2fith of :ranuary, 1313-, beginning
thus, " I shall say nothing of my dissatitlaetiop
at the course of conduct, which you have pursued
since I left the army." The last part of 'the sm.
tence, Which would have marked the date, is
omitted, and there has been substituted as the re-
mainder of the letter, and which relate/4 to Cir-
cumstances which followed the departure of the
Emperor after the campaign in Russia, the pas
sages which We have marked, and which tend
to the aim of the falsifiers.
Lord Castlereagh did not quote in his speech,
but he distributed to Parliament another letter
from the Emperor to the King of Naples. This
printed copy has received the date of the 7th
March, and as there is contained in it details which
can only relate to 1814, the date intended to be
given to this letter is 7th March 181,4. In this
letter we read these words, " you are surrounded
by people who hate France and seek to ruin you.
I have given you many warnings. All that you
write to me is at variance with your deeds, &c."
AVe have still before us the minute of another let-
ter from the Emperor to the Kitig of Naples ; but
it is dated at Compeigne, 30th August R>ll ; and
in it we find literally the passage which we have
quoted. It is, therefore, this letter which has
been falsified. None other of the expressions
have been presented to enable us to recognise the
true. letter. Now, bow could it have been said in
1811, as is printed in this letter, " i shall see by
your conduct at Ancona if your heart be sill!
French. Continue to correspond with the Vice-
Roy, taking care that your letters be not inter-
cepted."

The original minutes of these letters are in our
hands. The original autographes can be no where
hut at Naples, and they will confirm our asser-
tions, for, no doubt, they will be published.
What then are the Papers on which Lord Cas,
tlereagh has caused the documents to be printed,
which he has published ? What seal of authority
is affixed to them ? It lies with him to prove that
they are true ; and it would not belong to us to
prove that they are false. However, we shall fur-
nish the proof.
Ve are authorised to declare that there will be
shown to all Englishmen of distinction who are
at Naples, and who will ask to see them
Ist, The original Minutes of the Emperor's Letters;
2d, The Minutes of the same Letter's, falsified, sand written
In the hand of the Abbe Fleuriel, who for 19 years has exe-
cuted the functions of Secretary in the Cabinet of the Count
de Lille and of the Count de Blacas.
There would also be communicated the.minute
of a letter written by Count Blacas to Lord Cas-
tlereagh, March 4, 1815, if Lord Castle'Tagil had
not kept the. original. It contains these very
words—" I have since likewise found in another
bundle three minutes of letters written by Napo-
leon, one of which has no date. I have the No-
nour.to send you copies of them, and they are not
the least interesting pieces which have been dis-
covered among the immense mass of papers which
it was necessary to search through."
These copies are evidently those of the three
letters which we have mentioned, two of which
bear dates, prove to be false, ant/ the other en-
tirely wanting a date.
We perfectly know, then, that it was on the
4th March, 1815, that the pretended copies of
these three letters were sent to Lord Castlereagh.
There shall also be communicated an original
letter, front a person whose testimony Lord Castle-
reagh will not dispute. This letter was written
on the 4th January, 1815, to Count Blacas, by
Lord Wellington. We shall print itat the end of
this note.

We have a right to deduce from it the following
facts, which no one can contest.

The Government of Count Lille had committed
to the English Ambassadorthe papers which were
found at his disposal, and which concerned the

King of Naples ; but then they had not falsified
thenvand Lord Wellington deduced the only con-
sequences from them which the real Papers could
present—" I return the Papers, which I have
read; they contain no proof against Murat."
Such an authority leaves us nothing further to
say. Lord Wellington attests that the Papers
which we quote are accurate, because they con-
tain none of the proofs sought for against the
King of Naples, and that thOse which have been
produced by Lord Castlereagh to Parliament are
false, since they strongly inculpate the King of
Naples in his conduct towards the Allies ; no one

can refuse this testimony.
What then happened in the interval between the
4th January and the 4th March, 1813 ? (1815, we

suppose.) , Count Lille, who never ceased to in-
sist, at the Congress of Vienna, that the Bourbon

branch of Sicily should remount the Th►ronc of

_...„.._
Naples, saw that the Powers who had contracted
Treaties with the Kiag of Naples resisted or he-