The Sun.
London, England, 1823-11-12 00:00:00

listed by men of temperate politics throughout
the nation, will henceforth, should this heartless
tyranny continue, restive to their ranks a rein-
forcement of every individual, who is able to
solve the most simple question of personal inte-
rest or discretion. The soldiers and militia,
moreover, have been at once insulted and left a
prey to utter famine. Vie first consequence of
this is already manifest—the army have dispers-
ed into bands of plunderers : they may soon be
re-assernhled under military chiefs, and their
hearts still burning with shame and vengeance,
will furnish means for a renewal of the war.

[NtW TIMES.I
On Saturday last we published a documeni
highly wor►hy to be referred to 7.n the presen.
conjuncture, the Proclamation of the King o
Spain in 1814, pledging himself to establish on
the firm basis of law the rights of the Throne
and the " equl►lly inviolable rights of the people."
Now is the time for the Spanish Monarch to re-
deem that solemn pledge. Resolutely as we have
contended against the anarchical Constitution,
which was forced upon 'the Spanish People by
the bayonets of the Mutineers of 1820, we
shall no less resolutely contend for their right
to a good, a wise, and a free Constitution,
founded on their ancient liberties, and adapted
to their present and future happiness. The Pro-
clamation of 1814 not only promises this, but
points out the mode, the only mode, by which it
can be safely attained ; namely, by the King's
deliberating on so important a subject with the
Representatives of the nation legitimately as-
sembled in Cortes. The ancient Cortes of
Spain and Portugal, the S►ates.Geeneral of
France, and the Parliament of England were
only so many diversified modes of National
Representation----so many Great Councils of
the Realm, by whose advice, and with whose
assent, the King, the head and chief of the State,
was bound to act, in the discharge of his high
legislative functions. They represented the na•
tioa ~truly, by representing the great national
interests: and this was a far better safeguard for
liberty than if they had been chosen on the
most comprehensive system of Universal Suffrage
ever devised by the ingenuity or conceived
by the folly of our. Parliamentary Reformers.
It has happened to us eventually to outstrip our
European competitors in the improvement of
Representative Government. There have been
times when that was far from being the case.
Under the tyrant Henry VIII. the English Par-
liament was a model of servility and baseness ; '
under the well meaning bat misguided Charles 1.,
the Parliament laid its parricidal hands on the
Constitution, murdered the King, and enslaved
the people. Providence has graciously enabled
us to redeem those errors ; and we now possess
a Parliament, which answers it, legislative pur-
poses more fully, fairly,and effectually, than any
similar assembly does or can do.in any other ne-
on..

[BRITISH 1
tis always well to tread ith caution where
we do not see our way clearly ; for unless we
do so, the velocity with which we travel only
carries us farther from the right road. To a
great Commercial country like our own, peace
is always a blessing. It is a blessing, Indeed,'
to all countries, but to Great Britain pecu-
liarly ; war is therefore never to be entered upon,
but under circumstances which offer no alter-
native; such circumstances rarely occur, perhaps
never did occur, to any nation not predisposed to
profit by them. Should France be found to act,
as we fear she will, upon the views of wealth and
power which are at present directing her atten-
tion to South America, however any counterac-
tive policy which this country may adopt in such
it case may be defensible on the ground of expe-
diency, it will be defensible on that ground
alone. We mean here to speak not of moral ex-
pediency----for morality has no concern with it
but of an expediency purely political ; for,
iii meditating the acquisition of the Spanish
colonies, though the conduct of France may
be unjustifiable, yet our Ministers, on their
side, will not easily absolve themselves from the
blame of braving deliberately adopted a course of
policy which directly led to it. If, disdaining
all connexion with freedom, we suffered her un-
furled standard to be trampled upon, and stood
by, the secret applauding spectators of the late
atrocious and unprovoked attack upon Spain,
what moral right have we to interfere, should
France indemnify herself, by the possession of her
Colonies, for the heavy expence she incurred
Jrt, the destruction of her Constitution ? Our
Ministers approved of the W. step; what reu.
sonable ground then have they to complain of the
other ? If that base invasion of the Peninsula
which our Cabinet connived at, while it restored
a system of tyranny, becomes in Its effects a sys,
tern of national aggrandizement on the part of
France, 4)11 what principle of justice or consist-
ence cy.n they appeal against it ? Can the same
persons countenance violation of every principle
of
,justice and good faith in the atmosphere of
Madrid and Cadiz, and insistopen.thele:beleg
held sacred in the latitude of La Plata 4.0 d, Peru ?
Should Great Britain be forced into hostilities in
defence of her counnerrial and political int•ereats,
Ministers will no doubt very pathetically lament
he necessity of imposing fresh burdens on. the
eople.

LAW INTF,LLIGEIIOE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, Nov. it
CARTra v hiiICNAUGHTEN.
Alt.tlllllo was heard during the greater part of the time in
which the Court sat, in the expusition of a very long and tedi.
ous affidavit of accounts.
DF.A.TII OF TliE CUM` DAROU.
The 'Ant) Catasc Ltort announced to the bar, in an im.
pressive manner, that this CUM had occurred in the course of
the morning.

VICE!.CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Nov. 11.
The Coon was occupied during the greater part of the day,
in concluding the cute of " Trollope and Linton." The pro-
perty at stake was considerable ; but the question, which was
of title, had no general interest.
Oahe V. 3V/11:NTT.
This was a question up the construction of a will. The
plaintiff', M H iss aig, who is the daughter of a gentleman of
fortune, took certain properties—to wit, a sum of 9,0(301. 4 per
Cents., and a valuable chest of plate, under the, will of the fate
Mrs. Herat, of Prince's-street, Hanover-square. The terms of
the devise tas respected the 1,0001.) were—" to Swinney,
Esq. (the defendany and a cc-trustee, in trust for the sole use
and benefit of my adopted daughter, Ann Hurst Haig, to pay
her, and allow her to recive duly, the dividends arising from
the same." The plate was left to thematic trustees, in the first
instance, for the sole use of Aliss Haig's mother, during her
life, and independent of her husband ; at her death to become
the property of the plaintiff. It was admitted that the gift of
the plate to Miss Haig wan absolute; and,
Mr. HEALD contended, for the plaintiff,. that the 9,001. was
in the same situation ; the gift of the dividends to the sole use
and beneht being tantamount to a gift of the principal, and such
a devise as empowered the plaintiff' to dispose of the property
by will.
Mr. Art L. submitted, on the other side, that the words of
the will were not apecitic enough to give the plaintiff any, thins;
more than a life interest in the 9,0001. He relied upon d it.
ference of expression between the devise of the plate sod the
devise of the money.
. The Vic it- elt A SCELLOIt by no means thought that circum-
stance decisive; but took time (until Thursday) to give his
opinion upon the question. His Honour cheerved, however, in
the course of conversation, that he felt it to he the general duty
of the Court to look rather at what a testator's wards absolutely
eaprevied, than at what he Might be eupposed to have intended.
If the practice were to obtain of supposing what a man was
likely to have meant, instead of taking the direct and obvious
effect of his words, the consequence would ire, that the disposie
tiert of a property constantly would depend upon the peculiar
constitution of the mind oft judge.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov. 11.
. 7:0A14 ANA 'WATERMAN' v. Totere.tat.t.
This was an action of trover brought against a banker at
Liverpool , to recover the value of a Bank of England note for
1,0001., which the plaintiff* lost, and which they charged that
the defendant took, either fraudulently, or under circumstances
which ought to have excited his vigilance and suspicion. The
case was tried before Mt. Justice HoLROYb, et die lost menses
for Lancaster, whet the Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff's, 1
damages 1,0001. It oppeare4 that the clerk of the plaintiff, hay.. I
ing procured four tiPtee of 1,0001. each, to lodge in the Bank of
England, foultd, on his arrival there, that he had only three in
his Pi:moisten, The missing note was advertised, and a large
reward offered far It, but without success, until about a year
after the km when It was traced to the posslasion of the de-
fendant, who alleged that he received it from Mr. Henry, the
keeper of a tavern, called the Ilmericau tavern, at Liverpool, who
Changed it forone of ills customers. On behalf of the defendant,
to *flew that he received the note trierifide, and for a sufficient
,4,,ideoition, Mr, Henry ws, called, who swore that a ponton,
about to sail for 'America, who was lodging at his house, had
the note In his possession, and wished to buy goods in Liver.
'pool, but could find no one who would change the note. By
his delire, Mr. Henry requested the defendant to ellange it,
arid received from him the whole amount in cash anti bills.
The clerk* of the defendant also corroborated this statement,
with respect to the amount of bills tr.e cash actually given.
On this evidence, Mr. Justice 1101,ROYD told the Jury that
\
if they believed the defendant's witnesses, they must fold their
vordltt in his favour ;
The 4ca.torrox,fiemao. moved tor a PIO- tO Stinw cause
why the verdict should not be set aside. and a new trial granted,
yet they found against 141 M.
' He urged that` the verdict VISA clearly *gals= the evidenee,
. ktiollentirely tegatiNea the susekihus tibed 'tor the plaintiff,

[MORNING utnat,n,,)
A new species of gambling is just beginning
to develope, itself in England, which has bean
broughtabont by the spirit of avarice, at present
so predominant in this country—we allude to the
system of some foreign loans. The plan is for.socoe
one to conjure up a foreign state of some SOftw—
We will imagine that certain parties have a
great Inclination to get hold of, as much of John
Bull's money as they can---half n million,
or a or more, it matters not how much.
The greater the sum, the sooner the parties
will be able to retire, For that purpose they
have recourse to a Directory—the Commercial
Directory will answer the purpose hest, for it
contains the names of all the merchants, ii‘nd ma.
nufactorers, and shopkeepers in the iting4ons.—
Secondly, the prospectus is ativertiscd,ip all the
newspapers, The parties prepare 11,45 t oftsati.

scribers. It is put forth that the loan Is for a , and that the &Vide of a respeetable man had sustained spa's clerk as the wet of making such claim. The praetor thro
unmerited Injury by, the decision, _ „r ~ .
million, and that for erery 501. money, a bond : The LORD eurxr Jurrtet, edit wasulting with the other waited on the master, and informed him that if he persisted in
for 1001., with a Ate per ciat.hstrong Julepcitterest on the bond Judges, said the case wsa pregnant with i • on, and his refusal, an action would be entere-1 egainst him for theon,
lOs 4d. A
for 1001. will be given. This is a bait, even in the was peculiarly fit for the consideration of the Jury, who had • •
master declined to settle the costs, but tendered the wagel.,«-
beard the statements and observed the deportment of- the wit-
way of interest, too grntt-lstr the cupidity of John noises. The Court couldnotthat they had
say drawn a wrong The clerk of the adverse proctor then attended Mr. Walton, or
tend to such cues ?
An adion was entered accordingly, and then the
g rather his clerk—
Bull to withstand4l4e being five per cent. per ann. conchtsion, and wouldnot disturb the verdict.
, Lord STowent..-1 am sorry to find the clerks thus inter-
.
on his outlay of M., it amounts to ten per cent. ,IRASIER V. WOOD AND ANOTHER.
Mt. BCARLETT moved for Riede to shew cause why the faring here on both sides. Why don't proctors themselves M.
verdict for the plaintiff in this case should not be set aside and
interest. Besides, the stock-broker will tell John
tproctor for the master (Isle. Addams) - W I
Wood and others for a distress taken under their
of the chance rte hits of the bonds, at some time a new trial granted. It was an action of trespass against air. Dr. DoDSON.—The captain then offlred the Ns. Ad. and the
wages ; but refused to pay the further expencee incurred. The
or another, being worth 1001. The contractors, Aldermanwarrant, in Thavies-Ihn and the only question in the cause wrote ti letter to Mr. a •
in their prospectus, tell John that they shall take was, whether the inhabitants nts of that place were liable to be son, Informing him that he should bring his conduct under the
They have an rated to the poor in the parish of St. Andrew, Holborn. At time notice of the Court, the next Court-day. On receipt of this
care to withhold three dividends.
trial it was proved that the Inn wait locally situate within the Intimation Mr. Watson's Clerk applied to Messrs. Addenet
parish, but the Jury thought the liability of the inhabitants to
intent in so doing ; for by this means they make - and Co., begging that the -matter. might be postponed
tillthe thing of some apparent worth in the money the rates was not substantiated, and they accotdingly found A of town,
the next Court-day, an Mr. Watson himself was out
re-
verdict
books
Itheipilintiff, with 31. 9s. damages. Since that time, uetotwn, but would he back during rho week. This rei
market ; that is to say, they make the 1001. bonds
been discovered among the muniments of the (:Dort. s was refusedt and the matter was brought on at the net
apparently worth 151. each: to this let us add spe„vreirsah, of dsetes from 1745 ta 1750, spewing that residents of lt had become quite necessary for Mr. Watson's
justification that it should be heard as soon as possible ; and in.
another 151. as the sum had been rated, and . alibrding reasonable presumption which speculators, bidding the Inn deed the conduct of Messrs. Addams and Co. had put it out of
that they
_had paid the rates, which might have .produced
one against another, might choose to risk upon
strong effect on the Jury. '1 p i h•officers wseearreeealnyxouupseotaur the power of Mr. Watson to settle the matter, on behalf of his
client, quietly out of doors. After the affidavits should have'
aneAr trial of this case becauseteatrlise; could
each bond in addition to its apparent value, andbeen read which were now brought into Court on both sides[
thus we may suppose these bonds starting at the prevail on any other Magistrates to issue a warrant, and there. the Learned Counsel would move the Judge to condemn Mr.
fore might be precluded from again trying the question • and
price of 301. T m bus the contractors ay sell the they were willing to pay the costs of the former inquiry.
had been incurred in the recovery of the wages. Ile (Dr.
whole of the loan at the rate of 301. for every The COURT said that it was by no nteans of course to grant a
new trial on the discovery of fresh evidence,3cen)'w"*3rry to be thus obliged to occupy so muchoi th
and that they al- D°
101,1, bond, or as much more as they can. As
ways inclined against the practice as dangerous. In the present Court's time.
long as the Contractors can play this game, case, it was clear,)
on the parole testimony" in the cause, that no Dr. JESSE ADDAHS Said, he would, after :the iffidevit had
„ been heard, submit that the conduct of Mr. Watson had beta
it matters not to what extent they carry it, rates had been •,d f
pa. or seventy years, though in general pa- hiehly unjustifiable.
there bein no law to call them to an account. rishes were eufficientlyalive to their own interests, and ready
to charge all whom their officers deemed liable to contribute to Load STOWELL asked whether this matter had been referred
g to the registrar for his opinion ? It was a queetion much more 66
Now, suppose they manufacture twenty thou-
, their eipences. During that period, houses had doubtless 'to itb fought before him than before the Court; and scatty Olt
b
sand of these one hundred pound bonds, which) been transferred from owner to owner, and the purchasers had
probabiy been induced to glee higher ptit.es tor them, on the the Court would have the btnetit of his judgment. If it :Mould
appear to him, that according to the practice of the Admiralty
they sell in the market for thirty pounds each,
supposition, that they were exempted from rates, wurliti,chthileireefeeorne-, this charge and these wages were doe, doubtless they would be
duct of the parish tended to confirm. The :Co
they get into their clutches 600,0001. of John
even pay the acting on that principle which always paid; determination;Coiftantothtehhealetstvreatrt':doht ntr ought to satiiee
led them to incline to
Bull's money, and should they
quiet tibtlesafterflong possession, would not deprive these parties which principally detailed conversations atuidemefettlinlge R'sffibdetattvertita4
three, first dividend 9, they would only have to o thebenefit o the verdict. They therefore refused the rule. ,
clerks. The Court would listen only to principals ;and ite
pay him back the t 00,000/., so they would sack Dor, ON THE DEMME OF pAREER, v. BARTLETT. time was not to 'be taken up in listening to these cases, whet°
309,000 L by the scheme ; but when John Air. IiASELEE moved for a rule to show cause why the ver.
diet for the plahoiff in this action of ejectment, which was tried the Question at issue was the
Ttle matter was then efer sutra
redn tontfhhesßife--isgttritnes.
applies for his fourth dividend, they tell L M Lim before r. Justic'e SU Trough at the last assizes for Devon, e oUN
hould , ar.
.BOATS—NAIdrS UNKNoWN—(I, 2,3.) ,
that they have not received it from the state for not be set aside, arid a new trial granted. The affidavits in
The KING'S ADVOCATE obtained the Court's decree tor
whom they contracted the loan, and there. this case developed a scene of as gross fraud And perjury as
head money oh the destruction of' three enteny'e gun-boats;
ever wag exhibited in a Court of Justice. The defendant had
each having a complement of seventy-five men, in the year
fore they cannot pay bum. N long
ow they are been in possession of an estate which belonged to the Hill, by the boats of his Majesty's ship Hotspur, Captain
not compelled to give any proof that they heirs of Richard Parker, who was executed for Its share in Percy. These vessels, formed part of a French flotilla which
he mutiny at the Note,and who were clearly entitled to
was anchored in a Hide harbour 'tear the rocks of alvados,
have not received such payment of interest ; to tit, unless Richard
the 300,0001.: remains snugly lodged in their cof. the plaintiff' called Parker
himeelf jeohnajta'arlees ofll:airrit.rThaentlecslsarmta not far from Cherbetrg. The enany's.batteries, under the
of which they were riding, severely annoyed the captors,
fell. If they were to put (drib this sort of pro. the estate as the only son of Richard Parker the mutineer.—
gunswhose
vessel took the shore when within half-gun shot Of the
Specters with regard to well.knov7n Kingdoms and tw•tetrletigtebt; I.)feerrshoanp sw.;
hioeenctom
he a quest?, whether, if
lllehreeaelly forts. The ran-boats' crews eeceped or were owned ; two of
States, the thing would be soon exposed by the titled to more titan a moietys the
opftetettes.,eteto bae'l* he
wou 110 the boats being rule on shore and destroyed, and a third sunk.
;"" question might Head-money decreed.
Ambassadors of those States resident in England; be raised as to the rejection of certain evidence at the trial, A monition was obtained against the mister of a merehentL
un the ground of professionalconfidence • but theview which
,
so in order to avoid such exposure, a new Slate or
7 the Court would probably take of the merits of the case would nuary last hoisted a blue royal ensign in port The Captain
Principality is to be conjured up, rvltich is easily render all discussion of these minor points superfluous. The i• • -
snen,
o his Majesty's shipi Ne observing the mercanttnan with-
tness was the widow of t • r anti thepre-he .mtoinee. out any colours, sent his Lieutenant on board, who desired the
done. They say that the loan is for the service of l'erniYeillowtititr I the lessor of who gave her eteci master to hoist one. The blue cosign in queetion was runup',
the King of the Mogul territories--the Suiten of thence in 'll manner well ca calculated plaintiff;
'te to captivate the jury, an (the excuse being that the) had no other on boird.—Monitiono
Delhi, or for the Chief of the Order of Palestine, for whom an interest had been previously created by allusioes s.d
grant .
who means to appropriate the proceeds of the tsc;iethweabsrbsovernryatanie
Aberdeen,
fate of her husband.. She stated, that One or two other motions, of no public interest, being die-
b leen, and lived in the village of Brernaan, patched, the case of the ship
loan to the restoration of the Jews ? The to secret in Scotland, until the year 1793, when she went 1
La' bin urg i EREntRiCK •
on the part of the Contractors is to pay the to visit some relation, though for purpose she did not specify. was called. This was a question of wages, and Dr. inntril,
She then asserted, that as she was getting cut of the boat, in his opening, intimated that he should move the Court to
first three dividends, and it would even be their Richard Parker, who was in another boat, assisted tier; he decree cagainst
costa : the Proctor for the mariners, who had pHs-
interest to pay the fourths; for if they did, and that had never seen her before, but lie declared Met he would never 1,4 them and put them to much unnecessary expence. As
being so much more than John Bull bargained lbeua;iled.irscr,liaknd shortlyb after she was married to tins. 21. t 110111ef the argument of Counsel was not concluded, we shall postpone
for, the latter is caught effectually, and iinine. her o'aglea hall,
ythe Rev. John, „,. (Jordon,, ,themn"l,l, er,l3 our report till the next Court-day.
parish, whohappened to be in rntiourgn,anu in time 1M0.............•
diately after, the parties would be able to presence of her brother, who also happened- to be there
at the time ; and of other witnesses. To account for -tla 'LT() N.—
negociate another 1,01111 for a million or
absence a Mr. (Jordon she stated that he had become minently t
two. As for the money, his Sultanship may insane;but • d ' •
produced a certificate, purporting to be signed egistrates t
or may not get it, , for hat John knows.— by him, and witnessed by two persons, named Small and thev en preset
yet
nzie, who declared that they were present. She then said, tse
dorms
John thinks of is the ten per cent. in. WiCe
that after remaining at Edinburgh ten mouths, she was deliver. nd,
terest, and buying that at 201. which
ed of the lessor of the plaintiff, who was christened the same tend with i
hr
can afterwards sell for '2 51 —taking care, if day, which ceremony she witnessed through a glass door; and ato curb t
a certificate of the baptism was given by the clergyman, Mr. irbers of de
he be a w m ise an, like the late Mr. R Fraser. Shortly after this, she accompanied her husband to
icardo, to I human it
sell always "at the turn of the market." flow England, leaving her son in the care of her sister, at Bramsen, )wards Lin
far this new mode of raising the wind may be where she lived with Sir. Cumming, her husband. In the f repose
mean time she and Parker came to Exeter, where, in con- the 111 agi
carried, time only can determine. The only ob- • , .
sequence of some scruples of her father, she was remarried disposition
r (as tl
ject we have in view al to point out its princi. on the 6th of June, 1795, the parties being described as
?emite a
(area
pies to our readers, leaving them to dears their
beeteaur and. spinster. AtXsetet she had a second and a
nara sf.,n, both since deed, but was ntver known to mention be forest
conclusions- .
. 4".1 leLe., that she had left a son in Scotland. After sonic nine, Parker iti mann:get,
, peeve
was pressed, and went to sea, and soon 'fomented the mutiny use illness,
-,d• - • for which he suffered. To confirm the evidence of the widow, have witr
her mister, Alm Cumming, was called, who swore that she soured for
received the child from Mrs. Parker, and that she had mt. As fi
brought him up to his present age under the attune of John , and ie
Charles Parker, by which he was always known. On the part amongst
of the defendants,, .11 gentleman was called, who had been at sure of t.h
school with Richard Parker, anti had known him till his death, liable fain
who deposed that he never heard him speak of a son In Scot- ty lure, w
land, and that the reputation in the family was, that all his !membrane,
sons were dead. A surgeon, not certainly of very respectable lin the rat,
appearance, also stated that Mrs. Parker lamented to him that afforded I
she had no children; but this witness, on cross-examination, ll never le
admitted that lie had quarrelled with her, and otherwise laid t is indelit
himself open to remark. When Mr. Sergeant Pell, who was I too mud
Counsel for the plaintiff, rose to reply, the teethed Judge sug-
gested that no reply was necessary ; but the Learned Sergeant
liegged to say a few words, in which lie strongly reprobated lANteE, :
the attempt to defeat a just claim " by the evidence of such a
specue as the list witness ;" and quoted the well-known de-
scription of the apothecary from Rortfo and Juliet. The
Judge shortly summed up, and the Jury immediately found a
verdict for the defendant.
It was remarkable that the marriage of Mr. and Mrs. Corn- • • •
ruing was only three days before that of the Parkers, at Exeter;
as that the statement respecting the child being left with Mrs.
Cummings could not be true. The chief ground, however, for
setting aside the verdict would appear in the utlidavits, and
which disclosed a conspiracy arid fraud of the most atrocious na. ...
tune. First, the defentiants.swore that they were entirely taken ...... ,• • •
by surprise, never having heard any mention in the family of
any son of Richard Parker as living, or of any marriage in Scot-
laroi. Mr. Dore deposed that he had produced the pretended John
Charles Parker to the Rev.Jarn es Sundt and Mr. Joule, a school.
master at Brarnaun, and those gentlemen swore that he wasAlexe
ander Cumming, the son of the sister of Mrs. Parker, always
called by that IThine, and Lever by the tootle of Parker; and Mr.
Joule swore that he had been at the school several years. John
elmsley also deposed that he had always passed as the son of
Cumming. John Macqueen, and Mery his wife, deposed, that
Cumming had boasted that he gained the verdict at Exeter, by .
a certificate taken from a registry which they kept; anti i'lne. ,
.Mcqueen recollected his calling in her husband's absence,
and askirte to look at the register, when she saw him insert in
it the entry from which Ise afterwarde took a copy, but which ,
copy her husband refused to authenticate. Mr. Gordon, the I
clergyman, deposed that lie was riot at Edinburgh in 1793;
that he never married Richard Parke: to the woman, arid that
he never signed the certificate: and there were the affidavits
of several persons that Mr. (Jordon was not, as pretended,
insane.
The COtrltT hairnet eti that the Learned Counsel had said
enough to entitle him to a rule to chew cause.
Mr. Cwasaoto said that he wished to add one fact more, in
justice to the respectable solicitor for the plaintiff, who ought
to he exonerated from any suspicion of participating in the
fraud. The result of time heal had created a great seneation in
Scotland, where the falsehood of the call: was well known, and
some proceedings had taken place among the members of the
religious communion to winch the parties belonged. These
might induce the young mu to write a letter to the toliziter
dated 13th of last October, which that gentleman believed to b;
in his hand-writing from papers he had seen hint write at Exe
ter. The Learned Counsel read the letter, in which Ore writer
sail, that ••with the utmost confusion he avowed himself a
gross impostor ;" that he " knew not how to justify himself,
but felt bound to acknowledge the Integrity arid innocence of
the attorney ;" that " his father and aura were the lead. e
parties who instigated him eletter wa to the fraud." The ln'
_s
signed, " A person too well know', to you,.. and a POi;C:ipt
seas signed, A. Cumming."
The Count granted a rule to 'how cause.
Me. OA3ELEE wished the rule to be drawn up for the next
term, on im.:courit of the distance of the parties, but
The CounT thought it should be drawn tip i
terms, a' it might be enlarged if suet shouldc-ri the
usual
be shown
against it.

CO, .CIIANtA, Nor-vcniber I 1... ,
stosteitlati
Ditto, at Sight lt $
Itottertlain
Intweil, lt 6 (f
ilatnlntrgli
-th ontt
..
Paris,3 Day's sirj.t
Ditto
ri,onidextx, ditto
Berlin
Finitlifortr,tlttle Nl.sin ... .......
Peteisburgh
Vienna .
Trieste
Madrid
Cadizl
lill r o a ....................... .. ........... .... ... 1 42131:3:9:56657:8.99111::: 1 1 re44r.
tut:l'll:74 411
tint:::'
:18
Barcelona
Seville
..... 0
Gibraltar .... 30
Leghorn
...... 46
Gel 'h
...... .. • :.i---•••••Vcnice, ital. Liv• fag i 0
Malta 4r, --,—Nalites .......... 301 e, iti,
Palermo ............................. 1 ii, /1
Lisbon ................................. VI . 414.„
48
Oporto
t„,,',4
~ lu-'
Itto.lartairo .. 46 -7 .04,.
Bahia lts
. ........
Dublin .... 94 Cork 44 Inc. tact•. , r
to
BULLION. 0r
Portugal G,l,l,iti Coin • / 0 ° •
•
:3 If e
Foreign Cold, iii Bars
n
"
New Doubloons . .... . ........ •• -
0 4 Oii
New DOirs .1'
l I It
Silver tri B as, Standard.. .......... .

_gT '--it----Tirs_. 410
ffteglie
On Friday, the 7th inst., Mrs. Roobqrd, - t
of a daughter. Jo,
of o , '
On the Ist ult., at Constantinople, the Lad/
D..Leeves, of a daughter. ' 40,
MARRIED. ___A-Iso , *4l'
On saturday, the Bth of November, at Brv*- giiitiff%o
y the Rev. G. Saxby Penfold, John Marl 11,0tr_ , ebb,
eldest sorrof John Ensor, Esq., of Rolishy kOTiptlP
of Norfolk, to Mary Ann, second daughter co Zi
Es q., of 'Worthing. rt Tll4°
On NVednesday last, at Kensington, Rohe--itre Pl'
Esq., 'eldest son of Robert Mitchell, Esq., visgiailh
Tqbar; to Fanny, youngest daughter of John": 4- ote;
of Brampton. , 0411
On Saturday, at St. Luke's, Cheo'e4A' As.— osi
sEpurt.,
ecifu,CElisffge.,,Koern lytiotoisCeih.arlotte, eltlestiv33l6:oolo,o4oreniow
Owen Gleuttower NVilliams, Dig., of °le eitlad iaiglflii.
Williams., surgeons, Great St. 'Thomas "
of the late Rev. George Willisms, rector
morganshire, to Sarah, eldest daughter
Esq., Walwortit, Surrey.

te,D. „gel 00- sot
On Sunday last at BroOkinans, in the .'" ,-_,,..' tiotat ,
the Rev. James A'ugustus Franks of r" ' 'es
On the 10th inst.; Thomas smith, E-'4'' ' ' -.AI • ''
74. Fo'
04°44 ' Jell
on tht lOth inst., in the fling's-old, , ,00,
Itgedr, 61. enc.' tietpi'r
wiamiliionybeit'atiff°l'7ltactkYt.l.:llBl:l3'llt:irles'lriliniftrt.:ll,aetnrh3:lTer:lditie lA': ' ' 'l
.
, 08
4i it '
i 11444:# 1101 '
IPrinted ana Publialitti for Out - p 3°-,,,iti.
- Orricz. 112, Su-Iml, by .1, 'M r

HIGH COURT OF ADMIRALTY, Nor, 11.
TSlit rtZw PLIMMIX.
This was an application for a decree of cots.
Dr. DoD3ow briefly ststed the circumstances under which it
was made. On the Mh of June last, one Herring applied at
the office of Mr. 'Watson, a prottnr, far professional assistance
in recovering wages due to hint, for services as a seaman. on hoard
the New Plgenix• The proctor's clerk wrote the letter, usually
addressed no such occasions to owners, and made the claim.—
On the 30th, the master attended at the office of Mr. Watson's
of wages- due to Herring but he refused to pay the usual and
clerk, and offered to pay the sum of it, is. 44., a the amount
accustomed fee of 10s. 4d., 'which was .charged by Mr. Witt.

MAJOR WARBURTOti.-A tribute of respect
has never been more eminently deserved, or More creditably
paid, than that by the Magistrates of this county to the (Wide-
man whose name heads the present paragraph. Major War:.
button has spent the last seven years in this county, as Surer-
intendant Magistrate—and, eluting that period, in a situation
in which he had to contend With the prejudices and evil loci'
penrities of the multitude, to curb their licentiousness, arid try
que.itly to punish the disturbers of the peace, co tempered WOO
bearing with kindness and humanity, that not one entertain-
ed an unfriendly feeling towards Lieu. To him we have be!,l;
ch ''
iefty indebted for the repose of this county, froni I"'
ready co-operation with the Magistracy, his excellent #l'
rangernenta, and skilful disposition of his Police. file O.
trtiwolniesnra
duringni the past year (as
eneandeiiseeaaare L
threatened a
our ,}Kipttlation, can never be n>rginten:.° Nor will r,4:
Whets public anxiety • wee manifested. fey his tecoverY tr.
the severe and nearly fatal which such t,frnevilent
exertion occasioned, we have wiinegwd expresaiotlw.rol AV
must devout gratitude poured firth by hundreds tipsll
every account of amendment. As a private individual, bit
cliaritiA were munificent; and whichever' capacity Ir,s
view his retirement front amongst us, we must rcilltc
very sincerely. The departure of thls Gentleman ni!c,„,:
lily involves that of his amiable family—and this Hill
a void in the circle of society here, which 4' Will be
indeed to till up. The remenibrance of 'their madY saw
virtues will be long cherished in the rank in 'which they ,1'7,,T
—and the sense of the aid afforded by them, inf"
tilv
of calamity and distress, will never be obliterated 61:41;:if
minds of a grateful poor—it is indelibly imprinted 00,,,i.*.
hearts, which 44 have suffered too much to forget."-.4
Journal.)
AA.
tiithE OF gzlT- tar 'I-