The Sun.
London, England, 1841-11-18 00:00:00

THE QUEEN V. BINGHAM.

Mr. CHADWICK JONES applied to the Court for a man-
damus directed to Mr. Bingham, the Magistrate of
Worship-stroet, to compel him to grant a sum-
mons against the Ipswich and Norwich Railway
Company. It appeared that the Company had occupied
certain land belonging to a person named Emlin, from
February to November, 1839 ; that in December notice
had been given to the Company of a claim for compensa-
tion, and that in June following a summons had been
issued by Mr. Bingham, on the application of Emlin
against the Company. When the summons came
on for hearing, a preliminary objection was taken
on the part of the Company, that due notice
had not been given, and on that ground the
summons had been dismissed. Emlin had subsequently
discovered that due notice had been given, and had re-
newed his application to Mr. Bingham, who, however,
refused to grant a fresh summons. Under these circum-
stances the application was made to the Court.
Mr. Justice PATTESON—Take a rule to show cause.

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Nov. 16.

(Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR Of ENGLAND.)

SALISBURY U. MORRICE.- -MORRICE U. SALISBURY.

In this case, which was partly opened yesterday, be-
fore his Honour the Vice-Chancellor of England, the
arguments were resumed to-day after tho Court had dis-
posed of a few unimportant cases. This bill was filed
by Mrs. Salisbury, the only daughter of a gentleman
deceased, named Webb, who had formerly carried
on the business of an agent and land-surveyor at
Salisbury, in partnership with his nephew, and a gentle-
man, named Ackwood. The object of the bill was to
obtain an account, against the representatives of the
nephew, of the personal estate,''and also an account of the
rents of the real estate of Mr. Francis Webb, the father
of the plaintiff, which it was alleged the nephew had re-
ceived, in the character of agent and confidential adviser
of Mrs. Salisbury, the devisee for life, and also the
legatee of all the testator's extensive property. The
bill also sought to charge the estate of the nephew with
those sums which had been lost through his default to
the estate.

The arguments appear likely to occupy the Court for
several days.
(Befure Vice-Chancellor WIGRA M.)
RAMIE V. BAINES.

Our report of yesterday w•as inaccurate in stating that
the arguments in this cause had been concluded.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Nov. 16.
WALTER V. POTTER.

This was an action brought to recover damages for
the infringement of a patent. The disputed invention
was an improved apparatus for the carding of silk, by
the introduction of India rubber in the formation of the
cards in which the teeth are set. The cause was tried in
the sittings after last Easter, and the Jury found for the
defendant. Mr. Sergeant Channell subsequently ob-
tained a rule nisi to enter a verdict for the plaintiff; or to
grant a new trial.

Sir THOMAS liriLDE this day showed cause against
the rule, and was followed by Mr. Sergeant Bompas on
the same side.

The argument is expected to occupy more than another
day ; but as it turns entirely upon legal technicalities
and minute mechanical details, it cannot present much
to interest the public.