The Sun.
London, England, 1847-02-10 00:00:00

SANDERSON.

The arguments in this part heard case were resumed this
morning.

The case came before their Lordships upon appeal from
the decision of his Excellency the Governor of the island,
refusing to dismiss the respondent, the Chief Justice of the
colony, flout his situation. The case appears likely to os-
cupy several days, the first counsel for the appellant (Mr. J.
P. Wilde) not having yet concluded his address to their
Lordships.

CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY.)
The Lord Chancellor sat to-day in his Court, in the Old
lall, Lincoln's Inn, and heard appeal motions.

THE ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH COMPANY V. NOTT AND GAMBLE,

This case came before his Lordship upon a motion
in the nature of an appeal from the decision of
his Honour the Vice-Chancellor of England, ordering
a motion for an injunction made on behalf of the
plaintiffs, the Electric Telegraph Company, to stand
over, and giving liberty to the plaintifis to try such action
as they might be advised to try the validity of the patents,
to prevent the infringement of which was the object for
which that injunction was sought. One of the objects of the
present moti n was to discharge that order, also to obtain an
injunction from his Lordship to restrain the nefentlants from
directly or indirectly making, using, exercising, or putting in
practice the invention or improvement contained in the patents
' belonging to the plaintiff of the :years 1837, 1840, and 1842,
or from, or in any way, resembling or counterfeiting them.
We have already given a statement of the facts of the case,
and it is, therefore, unnecessary to repety them.
Mr. Bethell, Mr. Teid, and Mr. Heathfield, appeared in
support of the appeal motion ; and Mr. :quart and Mr.
Webster were counsel for Messrs. Gamble and Nott.
The case appears likely to occupy a day or two.

VICE-CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)
(Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND).
THE LONDON AND NORTH-WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY t",

SWA INSO N.

Mr. BETIIELL, with whom was Mr. Follett, applied in this
case upon motion to discharge an order made by Sir W.
Horne, one of the Masters of the Court, by which he gave
to the defendant six weeks longer to put in an answer, plea,
or demurrer to the bill of the plaintiffs. The London and
North-Western Railway company was now incor-
porated with many other railway companies, by several
Acts of Parliament, and it was usual in any bill filed
by the company to mention those Acts. The London and
,North-11 estern Railway Company had entered into a con-
tract with the defendant, Mr. Swainson, for the purchase of a
piece of land, and the present Bill was filed on the 22d of
December, 1846, for the specific performance of that contract,
and praying that:it might be decreed that the plaintiff was
bound specifically to perform the contract. The defendant
did not put in his answer in time, and not being, able,
as he alleged, to do so, in consequence of not having
had au opportunity of reading the several Acts
referred to in the Bill, he applied, under the new order, tdo
Sir W. Borne for further time, which application was grante
,
and six weeks fofther given, and that order it was now
sought to discharge.
ansiidhis
rte;;fr.erld\li,t'ooaaNitnkoidieuerigtba
aidnlvir.teelL
h7dreei gtochin.td-deoarpnp,t,of stesedni
r thed‘\ar
.yisi,, application.eO
i)t uotb ien
clln
COMMON PLEAS.—(THIS BAY.)
BARKER V. lANDEN.

On the assembling of the er_lirt this morning, this case,
whick was part-heard yesterday, was
Nr. Stepens., the teeretary of the company, recahq,d,