The Sun.
London, England, 1841-02-06 00:00:00

EVENING

ht
lint he could not but think the larger part of the ftletbe
Hon. Gentleman's argument applied as strcwiSlYito. big
existing system as it did to the measure prepoeu by
Hon. and Learned Friend. The arguments. •ra
Right Hon. Gentlemen were not arguments of riot
ciple, but of expediency. The Right Hoe. Geers:
had entered largely into the subject of the origin
perty, but there was not a word about this in the Bill
his Hon. and Learned Friend. This being the ea!e'i.
the illustrations of his Hon. Friend would be,as affri
cable to the term of 28 years, under the esisting.ll'2o
applied to all works produced in the last Year tiss
author's life. Exactly in proportion as a mall 6,5(1
not for the day, but for posterit would he be beeF, s,
by the Bill of his HonourableY' and Learned Fr'cdPss
He thought the course taken by his Hon. Fri-n4,,,te
most inconsistent, since he understood his objeeloielsa
the Bill to be founded, net on its principle.,".ooll
degreee. The boon that was asked could en'Y 874.
toE those whose works deserved well of their eneeid
very argument that had been used by the could
Learned Gentleman against the sixty
equally apply to the twenty-eight years. lle b°llo
rood
' therefore, the House would allow the Bill to be
second time.—(Cries of " Divide, divide.") a'
bt
Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD replied. fle tqui°ol
that if the Right Hon. Gentleman ePVSiIO: that
really cherished those deep and strong conviction, bsd
the Bill was calculated to inflict those injuries betios
mentioned, he would have expressed those eontwost
upon some of the many former occasions the 5, Of
had undergone discussion. The observations olliftos
Right Hon. Friend had made, and the. cle?'o4!,
years, v!
he had laid down with respect to propertY
it asuld
might be equally urged against. all property. 101
0
apply to all who were endeavouring in this ifeeettbeit
life to accumulate property for themselves 401
posterity. Was it authors only who bad priii
sons ? Might not others have descendantestiest
might dissipate their property ? The House nlig"thos
as well refuse to a Marlborough or a Welliegta tatt/'
honours which their illustrious services entitled Oleo?
because they might, perchance, have unworthy dee.ot
ants. He would, therefore, dismiss that argueletotSo
bang unaorthy of attention. Then with resPeetTaese
supposition that books would be suppressed. e 0•
again p
the same argument would a ply toletheh Oo lothor
But he would ask, might not works wh i-yog'
might desire to suppress be brought forward? inns'
no evil to an author, if he-had published song
turn misconception, or written something of :n so
riper and maturer years he had repented--swe'osla
that if he written one line which, dYieg' 110 be
blot mat, but could not blot out when dYleg;'
that continued before the world?
tilleirt;ihle;
pourable Friend had not attempted o
any one of the great examples
been adduced in support of the Bill' tiVe'
not to led with the cases of Ince Pr
Wordsworth, who was suffetina under undo de
tothe
glect, and who, of too noble a mind to Pirehr roue!
taste of the public, had waited his time, an worifa,ll't
that, when he had arrived at a venerable tittle"' at 1111'
works were beginning to. be profitable, lbethiln•...,ool!
moment the profit was snatched from
hear.) Was it not just and noble of tbe
tohneid men who looked beyond the grave, Oa"-
t future in the past ?—(Hear, hear.)
h lion. Friend supposed that the rnonopolY' at bad'
books dear ; but experience had shown that
such tendency. The extension of the Itneeertlalldel'
fourteen to twenty-eight years, far from be rather Prcrt
by an advance is the price of books, had rt.' et dit
duced a reduction, and it was natural to eero-sesq,
it would do so ;as books could be produced mere pf
by one press, one set of publishers, and °De 110 all
vcrtisers than by fifty. He would not have tr°l,u•iAlibt
House at this time with any observations, if,".1.-eotbri
Hon. Friend bad not thrown the weight of 11;atione'
rity, the grace of his eloquence, and the le,selsrilll
his style, into the scale in opposition to till° -Ssiee.,.
He (Mr. Sergeant T.), however, thought the 'ol.;Caoaw
Wordsworth, Southey, of Moore and RogerPosbif
ridge, speaking, as it were,
son of Sir Walter Scott—(Cheers)--iseis
against all the powersand genius of
le
the
Friend's address.—(Checrs.)
from the grave' "fils v,7:4
Lola
Strangers were then ordered to withdraw,
House divided, when the numbers were' 3s
For the m0ti0n........ ..............
fur the nmeedment .............................
M...........................
_,••••
Mr:MUM, PPOITsSIOIN. • aro
Mr. HAWES moved for leave to brill; -11116'4-It
" to amend the laws relating to the Medical riTtlis
The Hon. Member said, that as he underston' eillh;
ition would not be opposed, he would not thf Of
ito any details with regard to the provisie°s
measure. r,ao, is
Mr. MA. r. FOX ULE did not intends
terroe't
a reg./
motion. He thought that some reform w" is
the laws relating to the medical professio ill' a' 0011,1
try was certainly desirable ; and he belic;'?gg
stating that opinion he expressed the fee:ll;6°,s'
three great medical bodies in the country---,l' ay'r
of Pits s'cians, the College of Surgeons, ell"
pony of ApotPecaries.
Mr. IV AKLEY said, that if the flee'tprres
opld
who had lest addressed the 'llJtts,? Wert/ Cpfil.l
tt, support such a measure of Medical rcfcri-i
have the senction of the three bodies 4`1071.11). b)io
would not give satisfaction to the profession. be oAit
the gwas icleo'ahmtee
itftahcatt
possibledwias
ssa,
tti
shaf o‘amscetoiubodies had gi t° t -'jots
desire e
which so generally prevailed Itil''oiatfitatdbr-iie!issearisfa,c;)erra;lircro6
toot
•
Mr. WARBURTON concurred. in teei",,c oescor
the Hon. Gentleman who had just sat oto-dres",
thought that a reform in the three gre'lit
selves,r and their statutes would ho 06d- 14..' fir
vv,uld not now go into details, but he beP5 diet!),
Friend. would be more successful in plc'l bed, of
e!sion with his Bid than he (Mr Warhurtoch 5105600
with the one which he had int;oduced et t-bce 2b°er
efa;endnit his duty ltnie
last Session.
opposefelt boundany t
Bill taythicbilo;lecitti.blicio
•l to put down irregular practitionertsolh of
strenuouslywould as he had opposed the CoPYrit'sl'oriingoe
never consent to any provisions seohs,,o3l;oll
porations to drag an irreau!ar practitioner ude
Magistrate, with a view of nuttieg -°,tice sfer
was not the method by which irregu'ar Pre.' wio
atondbe prevented. The principle had bees° Id ePP
over again, and had failed and he I'6l 111
I,s
any Bill embodying such a prit:e:- fr-°
Lord JOHN RUSSELL gee' srlj' ,ree
Under-Secretary of State, had been 1111°J
httloh-ei:elaislnalayadndesmttn netassuari de tolifa t
reformthe
niotnedofwtahse,
ttilliarteetnhinedical corporalx-il;cosr
acknowledged :nowledged that some medieCa°lrrPc°fonrltnti°llllB4loltscAl:tibir°
would not now give any opinion en the tbrod
ject, but would content himself' by 114rilln-1 110;
thought it desirable that some more ceVne
should be taken to ascertain the Va' esat. rr
dical practitioners, than was taken at Pr"tielllue;lll°
Mr. HALFORD challenged the 11'.11;aseless'biroli
Finsbury to prove any char eof corruPti° to
medical bodies ; and he shouldg like to knew, far°
tate
of them the Hon. Member alluded in hijege 0 ectilrlt
his charge, and when the corruption bed t°,,Peetillaflo4#
theop
sMiGrr
aHindE N FRENCH 1 %art
dical reform. not taken up rho '1
R. INGLIS
„ fiae de
had accused the
soon
nt athndinkcoorritipethiaorng.ingThe question of misrot 51°10.1'11
was one that might be fairly discussed, hett ositga tot
corruption as the ColleateheofNPohbiseiciai:nrtel' °rfaeleeebliecelrtr.4
on the Medical Committee,b and usY far as beso-rstrq''
no charge of corruption had been broua'ht bot,
tainly none had been substantiated.the of
Mr. HU ME said the fault was not in at
object,in the saynelatetuhre.
questionlNled ical
oughtrel'or a
toi
IV7)03501:4-arC LIP
I,'"ott°,
Government.etNraiinbru.ttolovsAcaoyr(rLu A Pi;
lEJonexitiolaioae,dyth.antdvicidtas. not
amt
that any individual''l had bectisaol//c4:l/
hand into too public purse. What he did 11.1 o's tvae IpetC°
ing thebe Medical Corporations with corruPtl.setly c vpOJ
meant to say, and.. he now did. diciolferrcisjals'jj
them, that in exercising the authority '
them by Acts of Parliament, and by charted !egis pro.
legislated di.,lionestly—teat is, that theY tbe 110
do. ~
for their own benefit, and not for the g°°,,a aP rt
fession and the public. If any doubt esjei bin'sc or
mind of the Hon. Baronet, he would hob od tilPic: to
sponsiblc when the Bill was read a secPd shartj);lo
wheal he brought in his Bill, ss
be enabled to do—(Hear, bear)---4.° Ina
hii4) eeo
charge he had made.
Mr. HA WES then bi al in the I'l 'aeon"
'Oll dt
d
read a first time, and ordered see
L
that day fortnight. 1311)-j; gle J
IRIS II REGiSTRA.TIO,- fci-b
which be bolo gOO
, Lord MOIt['ETH brought in the - to
tion Bill, which was read a first, trod oracr.
a second, time that day fortnight. before
The House adjourued at a Cill3rte'
&Cheek to Monday.

REGISTER STOVES, 3 it. wiutlegisler4
Poles for Window Curtains, Is. 3d. per foot. "-eister sii,el',
Bd. k:er inch; elliptic stoves, 4d. per inch ; ri;l °loon
with bright fronts, bright and black bars, bgninch at feel
I.°°3. ; brass poles for window curtains, ' `Hale,
oeie twigt,
is. 3d. per foot ; 2 inches, Is. 81 ; a 2 int'Aete:Oijeiel'
inches long, with ends, rings, and brackets, cf.""erTery ,$f
Catalogues gi atis, containing the price 0. eet.
xstr
ironmongery. 00f"
HIPPON and BURTON, Wells-street,
I
!..,_,..—frs-,..--,-----..—,....-.•-•
D I E D 40
On the 31st ult., at Stanwell, J. Gibbons, Esq.' . flor
.40 fl
or
John Gibbons, Bart., aged 40. sir Oa" itil
On the 3d inst., in Spring-garden-terrace, oat
rison, K.C. 11. Lleob
r gal SO.
On the 30th ult., at Braywick- grove, near 00, 01
Rev. R. Bouchier, A.M., rector of Brightwalt
is,
1,17.. t.... . yOll- 111
.sstrtf)o
London: Printed anti Published by -ITA*'..-- - -02; .11
No. 112, Strand, at The' Sun-Ofliee, -o°' .or lr'''
the county of MidcUeley...Saturdoi, Magi