The Sun.
London, England, 1841-07-01 00:00:00

THUIISD-A-Y- , JULY 1,

1 '

31 R. NOTTER, late Box-keeper, to the
Theatre Royal Covent-garden, but now appointed by
W. C. MACH EADY, Esq., to fulfil the same duties at the
Theatre Royal Drury-lane, begs most respectfully to state, that
his ANNUAL BENEFIT will take place (by the kind per-
mission of B. Webster, Esq.) at the THEATRE ROYAL,
HAVMARKET, on TB URSDAY, the 15th day of July, 1841;
On 'which occasion Mr. MACREADY has most handsomely
consented to act in Sir E. L. Bulwer's popular Comedy of
" MONEY ;" after which, Miss Geary, the celebrated
Pianiste, has liberally offered her services, and will perform
Dohler's Grand Fantasia from " Anna Bulena," on one of
Erard's New Patent Grand Piano Fortes. To conclude with
other En'ertainments, which will be duly announced; when he
trusts for a continuance of the kind support he has enjoyed for
seventeen consecutive seasons, and which it will be his stre-
nuous endeavour to merit, by strict attention to the wishes of
the Patrons of the Drama in his forthcoming office.
Tickets, Places, and Private Boxes may be had of Mr.
Archer, at the Box-office, Theatre Royal, Haymarket ; and of
Mr. Netter, at the Box-office of the Theatre Royal En'•ish
Opera House,
Private Boxes may also be had at the Principal Libraries.

Tet. R-ITISH INSTITUTION,'
PALL,MALL,
ILP
The GALLERY, with a COLLECTION of PIC-
TURES from the ITALIAN, FLEMISH, and DUTCH
SCHOOLS; also the WORKS of the DECEASED ENG-
LISH ARTISTS, Sir J. REYNOLDS, WILSON,
GAINSBOROUGH, HOGARTH, and a SELECTION
from the pencil of the late THOMAS STOTHARD,
ILA., is Open Daily, from Ten in the Morning till Six in the
Evening.
Admission, ls. Catalogue, Is.
WILLIAM BARNARD, Keeper,

TO PAPER-MAKERS,
GENTLEMAN,in the PAPER TRADE,
residing in MANCHESTER, having a good con-
nexion among the consumers of that article in the town and
neighbourhood, is desirous of selling for a Manufactur4 on
Commission or otherwise.
Address, stating the kinds of Paper made, J. L., 14$,treA,
ford New-road, Manchester.

NV-HEM'', AS, :by anO -rder at the flier
COURT of CHANCERY, made in a Cause
TINKLER versus HINDNIARSH, it is (amongst other
things) referred to Sir" WILLIAM HORNE, one of the
Masters of the said Court, to inquire whether there is or are
any, and what debt or debts, and to what amount, to which the
defendants ELIZABETH HINDMARSH, Spinster, and
THOMAS TEGG and JANE, his wife, or either of them,
is or are now liable in respect of the carrying on and publish-
ing of the " True Sun," " Weekly True Sun," and " Morn-
ing News, or Public Ledger" Newspapers, which remain unsa-
tisfied, and in respect of which debt, or debts, the said de-
fendants ought to indemnified out of the estate of Ralph Ro-
binson Hindmarsh, the intestate, having regard to the Orders
made in the said Cause as to the said Newspapers, and the seve-
ral parties claiming such debt or debts, as aforesaid, were to
be at liberty to come in and establish their claims; therefore,
any person or persons, claiming any such debt or debts, as afore-
said, are to come in and prove the same before the said Master,
at his Chambers, in Southampton-buildings' Chancery-lane,
London, on or before the 14th day of July, 1841, or, in de-
fault thereof, they would peremptorily be excluded the benefit
of the said Order.

FRY, LOXLEY, AND FRY, Cheapside.

SIIMMARY OF THE MORNING

JOURNALS.

-14 W
H2RALD.— The Herald, after 'presenting their readers
with the conflicting state of the poll in the City on Tuesday,
whereby each party appropriates to itself the greater victory,
proceeds to argue on the supposition of the " Liberal " state-
ment, which claims to itself a return of two Whig-Radicals
and two Conserva.ives. If
statement prove, says the
Herald, untrue, even in its general features, a 3 to candidates
actually returned, and their prevstalence on the poll, it promises
to visit that party with heavy vengeance, for atteinpting to
mislead and deceive the constittionoy of the whole empire—for
the falsification of its returns, *aid the eager and instant diffu-
sion of that falsified statemeut to every corner of the empire.
Again, it states that if the returns prove equal, not equal will
be the triumph of the resneetive parties. That of the
Conservative will be plus—thai of the Whig-Radicals minus—
by all the iufluence of the Co* and the Government, which
were brought to bear, in the -*inst powerful but the most in.
delicate manner, (i.e. in the Orson of the Minister), against
the mere personal influence of 'private character, intelligence,
and mercantile station of Meaari. Masterman, Lyall, Attweead,
and Pirie, even if it prove it 46as in continuation but a drawn
battlO; ytjil it will have yieldett the most essential fruits of a
victory to the Con:,ervatives, sing that every nerve, energy,
and resource of the Whig ty--the dominant party in the
London Cerporation, were taitid to the utmost effort.
TIMES.—The Times neetles itself by putting into faxta-
position Lord John Russell's#ddress to the city electors on
Monday, and Sir Robert Peet` i speech to the Tamwerth elec-
tors on the same day. It, of ilium, cansiders Sir Robert's as
one of the most statesmanlike ilanifestoes ever published on a
political occasion, while. it cha#teterises Lord John's es:ts petu-
lant farrago of the usual Whig''?-opics of declamation. It then
eltters into a magniloquent reeew of the ,TatawoTth speech,
and discovers, by some unaceOnit.tble analogy, a likeness be-
tween the position which Sir lobert has ever occupied in the
senate to the retreat of the riuke of Wellington at Torres
Vedras. Surely the contrast is a- most unfortunate ono—few
can fall much lower than ref oat. A second article proceeds
to ground some remarks upon to Ministerialist admission that
they havelost two seats. It ystpones further remarks hereon
till.tbss Sheriff's return t. me,,?, when, if it prove that the
-Ministerial leader Of the H4i4 of Commons is defeated, they
promise, ,aselves ii.4.!;...t-s.x.ment, the sharpness of which
''silltbiliefLii,tened by thelr presiht abstinence,.
CHRONICLE. —The Chronicle has further a very sarcastic
article on the Tamworth speech of Sir Robert. Sir Robert,
it says, complains that the newspapers will not allow him to
speak for himself. The complaint is true, as regards the
Tory Journals, for the obvious reason that it would not be con-
venient for Sir Robert Peel to say in his own person all that it
is convenient for his, partisans to say in order to hold together
his heterogeneous faction. Sir Robert confesses the existence
of great embarrassment and distress, and deeply regrets it,
but his mighty manifesto contains not the shadow of a mitiga-
tive remedy. On touching upon the Corn-laws, he circumna-
vigates the globe for images to plamp out his skeleton theory,
while heknows all the while he is "angling for impossibilities."
Hitherto the great towns, with the exception of London,
justify our anticipations—Southwark, Portsmouth, Bath, Not-
tingham, Leicester, Derby, and Coventry return Reformers.
Bath has been wrested from the Tories, and Mr. Walter has to
rue the day he ever set foot in Nottingham. It would seem as
if certain parties in that old citadel of civil and religious liberty
had determined, by way of freak, to join the Tories in order to
give Mr. Walter a brief taste of the House of Commons.
As the election proceeds the Reformers will gain rapidly on
the Tories. The latter are notoriously strong in the small
agricultural boroughs, whence the first returns are received,
In the great towns, again, the Reformers, have a decided ad-
vantage. This day will make a great change.
On one point, Sir Robert Peel cannot complain of not being
allowed to " speak for himself." Nastily prevents his telling
with what new taxes he would commence his administration.
Mast people have a wish, as all have an interest, to know. It
is a portion of the policy on which the public is invited to
judge between him and her Majesty's Ministers. Here, at
least, he is allowed to speak ; and he maintains an " expres-
sive silence." So will not the people, when his new burdens
are lashed upon their backs.
POST.—The Morning Post has the following delectable
statement :—" We hear that from the beginning of the day
the word was passed through the Committees of the Ministe-
rial party that Lord John Russell was to be at the head of the
poll, and in order to accomplish this purpose they have, it ap-
pears, resorted to the easy expeeient of deducting one hun-
dred and sixteen from the poll of Mr. Lyall, and adding one
hundred and sixty-five to that of Lord John, by which means
his Lordship is placed above Mr. Lyall, who was really at the
head of the poll, and also by an unit above Sir Matthew
Wood, to whom these faithful reporters have assigned the se-
cond place. The truth will, we believe, turn out to be that
the position of Lord John Russell on the poll is not first, or
second, or third, or fourth, but fifth—the position which was
certainly due to his Lordship's political position—that, namely,
of leader of the losing men.