The Sun.
London, England, 1847-11-06 00:00:00

PLYMOUTH, Nov. s.—The rblura, of Pwellheli, wf t$
on shore on the Battery Roof, Sutton Pool, but was ps
sisted off without apparent dttalac,e.

MARKET NE NV S.—(THIS DAY •,)
covzii-x-GABaormr.
Potatoes, 5s to 6s 3d per c;:l.; Apples, is to 3' ; ; and
Pears, 2s 3d to 5s 6d eve ; Wale' Ats, 6d
per halt:,>j T z rnips,
to Is per hundred ; Greens, is 3d isr' 2s ;
Is 8d to 2s 3d; Leeks, is 2d to is 9d ; OniOns.
1 3 6d to
2s 3d; and Carrots, 2s 61 to 4s per dozen bu hes ;
)
Red Cabbages, 2s to 5s 6d ; White ditto, 9t3 t, is ;
and Cauliflowers, 2s to 3s 6d per dozen; Pine Ai pples,
4s 6d to 83 each; Celery, 8d to is 6d; and gorse-
r: ,dish,
3
Is 6d to 4s ; and Brecon 9d to is per bundle; slush-
rooms, 5s to 8s per bushel; Hothouse Grapes,. 2s to
4s; Out-door ditto, 3d to 8d ; Filberts, 4d to 9(
l, and
Cob-nuts, 6d to 8d per lb ; Spinach, is 8d to 2 6d Per
sieve.
NEIXTGATE AND IMADENBEA.IL 16.
Prime Beef and Veal sold readily at ful 1 p rices.
Otherwise the trade was in a very sluggi 3h 6tate-
Beef, from 2s 6d to 3s 8d; Mutton, 3s 6d to As 6d ;
Veal, 3s 8d to 4s ad; and Pork, 4s to 53. 2d per
Sibs by the carcase. Geese, 5s to tis ; Fowls, 2s 3d to
4s 3d ; Capons, 3s to 5s ; Chickens, is 9d to 3s ;
Ducks, Is 6d to 2s 6d; Rabbits, 8.&I to is 6d;
2s 9d to 3s 6d ; Grouse, is to la 6d ; Partrid,ges; 15
3d to is 9d; Pheasants, 3s to 4s; :and Pigeons, 83 to
10d each. Fresh Butter, 10d to is lit per lb. IA Irerets,

RITN6EI3,IIORI3
Full average supplies of most artzicles were on sale
to-day, and which meta very heavyv aquiry at drooping
prices.

NEWPORT.
Beef, from 2s 10d to 3s 10,1 ; Mutton, 3s 6d to 4s sd
Veal, 3s 8d to 4s 10d:; and Pork, 4s to 55....'9‘1 per sibs.
by the carcase.

WEXTECECAPEZ.
Beef, from 2s 3d to 3s 8d; Mutton, 3s 6d, to 4s 6d;
Veal, 2s 101 to 4s 8d ; and Pork, 4s. to 5s 2d
per Blbs by the carcase.

EILLINGSGATE.
Turbots, 4s to 13s ; Brills, 2s to 5s 6d; Cod-fi. ih•
to 6s 6d; Haddocks, 8d to 10d; Whitings, 40' to 8d;
and Lobsters, is 4d to 3s each; Soles, 6d to 2s Sd per
pair ; Fresh Herrings, 6d to is 3d per dozen; Salm",
10d to is 2d; and Eels, 6d to Is per lb. 2s 6d

BREAD.
The prices of Wheaten Bread in the metro polls are
from lid to 8d; of Household ditto, 6d to 7d per 41bs
loaf.

HIDE IVILLRICET.
Market Hides, 661 b to 641 b, 2id to 24d per lb ; di"
641 b to 721 b, 21:1 to 3d; ditto, 721 b to 801 b, 34-d
ditto, 801 b to 881 b, 4d to &Id; ditto, 881 b to 9,61 b, 4-,id to
4id; ditto, 961 b to 1041 b, 44d to 5-4 d; Calf St ins (each),
45 6d to 6s 6d; Horn Hides, 13s; Polled S deep, 35 to
4s; Kent and Half-breds, 2s 6d to 2s 10d; Downs, 25
4d to 3s. to 34d;

EAT MARMETS.
SMITHFIELD. Meadow Hay, 21 103 t o 31 12s;
Clover ditto, 3/ 12s to 41 15s; and Straw, 11 7 s to 11 lls
per load. A moderate supply, and a sluggish demand•
CUMBERLAND.—MeadOW Hay, 21125 to 31 14s ; Clover
ditto, 3/ 103 to 41 12s; and Straw, 1/ 85 to 11 12s per
load. Trade tolerably steady, at but little varh pion 111
prices.
WEEITECFIAPEL.—Meadow Hay, 21 12s to. 3/ 12$ I
Clover ditto, 3/ lOs to 4/ 17s; and Straw, 11 643t0 11 1111
per load. Supply good, and trade dull.

COAL MATZKE

Adair's Main
Bate's West Hartley... 19s Od
Buddle's W. Hartley 19s Od
Chester Main lBs 3d
Clavering's Tanfield 15s 9d
Hasting's Hartley l9s Od
Holywell Main ..... 18s Od
New Tanfield l6s 6d
Ord's Redheugh
South Peareth
Tanfield Moor ..... 18s Od
Townley l6s 3d
West Wylam
Wylam
Wall's End, &c
Bewicke and Co l9s 3d
Gosforth l9s 3d
Hedley
Riddell's l9s 3d
Eden Mail. 2os Od
Belmont 2os Od
Braddyll's Hetton 20s 3d
98 arrival

T.—YESTERDAY.
East Hetton .........y,. 19s Od
Haswell 2os 9d
Hetton ... 20s 9i
Keepier
Lambton • 20s 6d
Russell's Hetton ...... 20s 6d
Shotten
Stewart's .. .. 203 6d
Whitwell . 195 6d
Caradoc ..... .. ...... ... 20s 6cl
Cassop.. ..... .._ ,200 3d
Hudson's Hartlepool.... 195 9d
Heugh Hall
Kelloe . 205 3d
Barrett
Cowndon Tees ... ..... 195 3d
Seymear Tees . 195 9d
Tees .......... ...... ..... 205 6cl
Derwentwater Hartley 18s 611
W. Hartley Netherton 19s Od
Sidney's Hartley

[s-82 sold.

VICE-CHANCERY.—(THIS DA Y.)
(Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLA.NV.)
CRAWFORD V. THE CHESTER AND HOLYHEAD 114/1..
WAY COMPANY.
This was a motion to dissolve an injunction re'
straining the defendants from infringing on any Fottion of the plaintiff's land not within the limits ot
deviation of the company's undertaking. The Sues'
tion turned upon the construction of the corapsnY
Act of last session, empowering them to extend they_
station, but it was contended that they were still
bound by the general Act, which restricted all devia-
tions from the deposited plans to one in four.
The case commenced late yesterday, and the OP'
ments were resumed this morning.
Nothing of any interest transpired in the other
equity courts.

QUEEN'S BENCH.—(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco.)

IS A DISLOCATION A BRUISE ?-M6ORE V. LABRON.

Mr. KNOWLES, Q.C., applied for a rule in this case,
one of a novel nature, calling upon the plaintiff to
show cause why the verdicts he had obtained should
not be set aside, or a new trial had, on the ground of
misdirection. The case was tried at the last York
.Assizes, before the Lord Chief Baron. It was brought
to recover compensation in damages from the de-
fendant, a surgeon, for negligence in treating the
plaintiff for a dislocation, the declaration averring
that the defendant was employed by the plaintiff to
cure him of "certain wounds, fractures, bruises, CO'a"
plaints, aad disorders," and that the defeniunt disre•
the
garded his duty, and that, by his negligence,
defendant was greatly injured in his health. The
evidence simply showed that the defendant was em-
ployed to treat the plaintiff for a dislocated; arm'
Now he submitted to his Lordship at the trial that
there were no words in the declaration to show the
exact nature of the plaintiff's injury—nothing to show
that he was suffering from a dislocation ; for instance, he
contended that a dislocation was not a fracture or a
bruise, but his Lordship, notwithstanding the exact
nature of the injury was not specified, di rested the
jury to find for the plaintiff. lie submit ted, there-
fore, that there was nothing in the declaration which
met the case. A dislocation differed from a fracture
or a bruise, and "complaints and disorders" every'
body knew did not require surgical skill like that
applied to a wound. A wound was not a dial()cation,
in a technical sense.
may DENMAN—A dislocation may or a, not
include a wound in the regular technical sense. „pes
it not include a bruise ? In
Mr. KNOWLES—A dislocation is not a bruise.
this case there was no appearance of a bruise, and the
alleged unskilfulness of the defendant arose from tuu

injury not being apparent in the part.
Lord DENMAN-It was a strange blunder on the._
part of the pleader to omit the word " dislocation," 1115
I think, nevertheless, that the Chief Baron was quite
right in his direction of the jury.

BAIL COURT.—(THIS DAY.)
(Before Mr. Justice PATTESON.)
CORONERSHIP OF WIGAN—THE QUEEN ON THE no'
SECUTION OF ROGERSON V. GRIMSHAW.
Mr. COWLING applied for a rule nisi calling upon
the prosecutor to show cause why so much of the
judgments as awarded costs to be paid by the de-
fendant in this case should not be set aside, and This
I why the taxation of costs should not be stayed. "k
,
was a proceeding in the nature of a quo warrant°, a'
the instance of Rogerson, who claimed to be coroner
of the borough instead of the defendant, end the
court decided in his favour. Rogerson commeneeu
the taxation of his costs, assuming that he was en.
titled to them under the statute of Anne, but the
Master deferred the taxation until the opinion of the
court had been taken in the matter. Mr. Baron
Platt was applied to, and he recommended the pre-
sent application to this court. He bad therefore
now to apply to his Lordship for a rule in order
that the matter might be argued—whether the
prosecutor was entitled to costs or not. On the
authority of Corner, p. 158 and subsequent pages, "
contended that it was quite clear the prosecutor cowl'
not receive costs. Looking at the construction of the
statute of Anne, s. 20, c. 5. The coroner of a borough'
appointed T
under the provisions of the Municipal C
poration Act, was not a corporate officer within
meaning of the Act, although he might be one, an
'
yet fill the office. It was true the statute of A°lll
to which he had referred, said the Court might away
costs, and provided that a quo warranto should 20114
against any person who might usurp the "
office or franchises," but surely it could be held. fill(
this that the defendant, who had considered bans?
entitled to hold the office, and had fairly contested the
matter, should be called upon to pay the whole of the
costs.
Mr. Justice PATTESON said the case was clearif
one for the consideration of the Court, and granted
the rule.

COMMON PLEAS.—(THIS DAY')
(Sittings in Banco.)
ARMSTRONG V. CHRISTIANI.
This action was tried before Mr. Justice Coltntall
at the last assizes for the county of Surrey, and;
verdict found for the plaintiff on all the issues. +l,O
was an action on a bill of exchange drawn by "--
defendant for 981. 15s.
Mr. M. CHAMBERS, with the pErmission of thehe
Learned Judge, now moved that the verdict be
tered for the defendant on the 4th issue. The °I
question involved in the present application was lesle
reference to the notice of the non-payment of I.",
bill, which notice was delivered to the defendant, and
did not, 113 is usual in such cases, state by wh"a t li:
d
bill was accepted, and that it had been presented, an _
payment refused. Several authorities were cited by
the Learned Counsel in support of his application.
The COURT was of opinion that the quest o_
issue involved circumstances of such genertil occl"