The Sun.
London, England, 1823-04-10 00:00:00

[MORNING} HERALD.]

Private accounts, and some journals of Mon
day's date, were received yesterJay from Paris. They states
that the French army had commenced the passage of the Bi-
dassoa on the Gob. One of the journals gives this intelligence,
on the alleged authority of the King, who observed to persons
admitted to his presence before mass, that the army was to pass
what may be called the Rubicon on that day ; and another an-
nounce~ the actual receipt of the intelligence by telegraph.—
The commencement of hostilities a few days sooner or later is
of no material importance. The arrival of the Proclamation to
be issued by the.Ditke of Angouleme upon entering Spain, and
which 'was given in the Herald off' yesterday, not only renders
die war a matter of absolute certainty, but proves that it must
commence without delay. This Manifesto is studiously unaii-
hurtling. It remains to be seen whether it is equally sin-
cere. It holds out one pledge which deserves sonic notice,
viz. that " occupation" is not the object of the invading army,
which will confine itself solely to restoring Ferdinand to the
plenitude of his power. But how is he to be maintained in his
new position ?--llalf a dozen conspiracies exploded in Spain
in the interval between the destruction of the Constitution by
Ferdinand, upon his return, and the successful conspiracy of
the Isla. It is pretty obvious that the changes effected by the
Constitutional Government and Cortes, during the last three
years of peaceful legislation, in the civil, municipal, and mili-
tary powers—in the interests of property, by the sales of na-
tional domains—even in the very constitution of' society—for a
society receives its spirit and character from the laws—Must,
independently of the progress,of constitutional education, have
marshalled a new and greatly increased mass of strength, 'in
support of the new order. If the King of Spain could not
muster resources to prevent the resurrection of the Constitu-
tion which lie laid violent hands on in 1814, is it likely that
he will be able (supposing the French successful) to maintain
himself upon the ruins of the Constitution of 1820 ? The evi-
dent probability is, that Foreign troops will he much more ne-
cessary in Spain than in Naples or Piedmont. The disclaimer
of occupation, therefore, may be regarded as fallacious. The
Duke of I3elluno arrived at. Paris on Sunday. Ile appears to
have gone upon an idle errand. - It. is evident that the Duke of
Angoulerne did not receive, him as Major-General of the army;
and it remains to be seen whether he does or does not resume
his functions as War Minister at Paris. The Ultra Journals
state, that his quick return,is to be ascribed to his having found
on his arrival that his mission was unnecessary. The most
contradictory accounts are given in the French Journals of
the progress of the Royal Cavalcade towards Seville. Ac-
cording to one, it is as sad as a funeral procession; Record-
ing to another, it is a continued triumph. No attack, it is
said, will be matte by the Bands of the Faith on the Royal
Party, lest the Constitutionalists should kill the King,
Queen, and Princes, rather than yield them.. But a dash, it is
threatened, would be made upon the Cortes, Madrid has the
air of being wholly abandoned. The troops and militia with.
drawn from it to escort the King on the 20th, and the Cortes
on the tath, bad left- it wholly unprotected. The Government
appears to have had no intention, froth the beginning, to dis-
pute the possession of the capital •witit the French. It is the
capital only in reline. A Freneh statistical writer says Of Ma-
drid, that " it wanted all the ittibstantial attributes of a capital
—riot central—unconnected with thetranaaction of public busi-
ness—sittieted in a desert—that the real capital was to be sought
in the great maritime cities on the coast at the Mediterranean,
and in Cadiz—Madrid being a mere Versailles." Under these
circumstances, its abandooment by the Spaniards, and its occu-
pation by. the french, are not of real importance as affecting
the contest betrecen the two nations.

' [NEW TIMES.]

The Proclamation-of the Duke d'Angouleme
has been universally received with sentiments of decided appro-
bation. Its tone of perfect candour and moderation; its total
disclaiming of all views of aggrandisement; and its positive
pledge neither to impose laws on Spain nor to occupy the coun-

try, have effected a considerable change in the opinions of many
who had hitherto doubted the justice and integrity of the French
Councils. Two circumstances come strongly in aid of the
favourable impression made by the Royal Duke's Proclama-
tion.; one is, the flight of the Cortes from Madrid ; and the
other is, the avowal of the Marplot in The Morning Chronicle.
The flight of the Cortes really places them in a more despicable
point.of view than their prototypes, the runaways of Naples.—
The Neapolitans did not run away till they had actually smelt
the Austrian gunpowder, and had even had something like
a battle at Ried ; but the Spanish Carbonari have more of
" the better part of valour" than their Neapolitan brethren,
and gravely move off to transact business at Sevilla! By the
bye, they inform the Gentlemen who may be interested in the
late Spanish Loans; that the accounts relating
_to them will
also be kept for the future at Seville, which must be very satis-
factory to those individuals who could not obtain such answers
as they wished from Mt. Ilaldimand. It is observed, too, thar,
the insurrection, which according to The Times has been so
often suppressed, seems to survive its extinction in an extraor-
dinary Neu), ; and the factious, who never consisted of more
than a few miserable Monks and vagabonds, multiply themselves,
and perform very singular feats. Theyhave, for instance, taken
the Castle of Morvedro, near Valencia, which has induced
_the Republican Commandant of the latter city to declare it
"in a state of siege." The Royalist General Bessieres, so
often killed and annihilated in various ways, had his head-
quarters at Albacete, on the road from- Cuenca to Murcia.—
IJlmann, his confederate, is believed to have joined two other
Royalist leaders, Sempere and Chambo, who for some time
have menaced Segorbe and Castillon de In Plana. The Politi-
cal Chiefof Valencia informs his Republican brethren that the
Royalists were at Xerice, and had levied contributions on Se-
gorbe ; and instead of announcing any punishment that bad
fallen on these audacious Royalists, he only desires his friends
to " wait with tranquillity the result of the measures taken to
destroy those men." In short, let us cast our eyes where we
will over the map of Spain, we find Guerrillas rising up in all
parts, not to oppose the French, but to shake off the yoke of
, the Descamisados.

PROVINCIAL JOURNALS.

[Frona the Bury Gazette, April 9.]
So sunk is Radicalism in this county, so diapised has the
very name of Parliamentary Reform become, that but for the
efforts of the Tory press to do' justice to the proceedings of the
jobbets in representation, the party would be left unnoticed and
unknown. The County Meeting on Friday last, which we re-
port faithfully, was the forlorn hope of all who call themselves
Reformers. It was prepared by the head of the party, and the
requisition by which the Sheriff was induced to call it was
hawked about for eight weeks, by every descriptiopf Radical
Reformers. The press of the party pompously pkraded the
preliminary proceedings : " pine tenths of the freeholders
of Suffolk" were to sign the death doing document, which
was to drive Ministers in despair from the seat .of office,
and " leave the world to darkness and the 'Whigs."
..Never,
no never, since the days of Guy Fawkes, was there such an ex-
plosion as this was to be in the county of Suffolk. But, ales !
their light is extinguished, their combustibles have indeed ex-
,ploded ina little flash and a great deal of smoke, but have
done no harm, except to those who fired the train. Even " the
vehicle of the faction," pretending want of time,,dares not pub-
lish a faithful report, but:gives the world a partial and garbled
statement, and refers its .patrons to its compatriot Post for
the whole story. Now As, unluckily, the 1 relied upon
" the vehicle," whose duty it by right was to give a faithful
report, the party would have been left in the lurch, but for
the praiseworthy dime of the Ipswich Journal, seconded by our
own strenuous exertions to complete the work there be-
gun, and give the world the truth, perhaps not the whole
truth, but certainly nothing but the truth, deny it who dare.---•
The Sitrolk Chronicle says. that—" the Meeting fully demcin-
strated, as well by the attendance of the Nobility ! Gentry !
and Freeholders I ! ! of the County, as by the unanimity, or-
der, and Anneals of the prikeedings, that a Reform` in the Re-
presentation of the Commons' House of Parliament, to be ef-
fected by constitutional means, is the ardent and unequivocal
desire of the county at large."—Sips, when a man wishes a
story to be believed, the best possible plan is, to tell it boldly,
and put a good face upon the matter, as if it were literally and
substantially true ; fur, the first thing necessary to obtain be-
lief pi, to put on the appearance of -being convinced. Thus,
the Svpll: Chruniele, in all the conscious dignity of truth.!
and patriotism ! gives its faithful version of an event,
which few will contradict, because very few were present,
who wished that the fact should be known. We .happen
licivever, to be'pretty well infbrnied, and shall practice our old-
fashioned trick of telling truth, though i e shame the Devil.—
First for the Nobility. There was one Lord present. The
Lord deliver us ! and there were two Letters present, from two
Dukes, who appeared by proxy, we presume. Grace be upon
their representatives ! The " attendance of the Nobility" then,
in the Siffiblk Chronicle, is not true ; and if it were, we ask,
how dare any Peer of Parliament presume to interfere with the
Repreaentation of the Commons Great Britain ? We boldly
tell all Pukes and radical Lords in the realm, that
Constitution,they break down the barrier that fences
the
violate radical
te
in the aristocracy, and culpably encroach upon the rights of the
people ; rights as valuable, as inherent, as holy as dim they poi-
mess ; whenever they appear but to Sanction the stivillest varia-
tion ill the principle of the construction of the CoMmons House
of Parliament ; save only in their legislative capacity, when the
question of reform in the representation of the people, may
fairly and constitutionally be brought before them in their own
house. Till that time, their interference is not only iiiiperti-
nent, but is an outrage upon the privileges of the people,.from
whom they are set apart, and with whose representation, they
have literally nothing to do. We do not then CondeMn the
reform meeting that it was not graced by the nobles of the
land i but it is untrue to say that it was so graced. But there
was u portion of the gentry of the county present, is true ; but
that portion was so small, so very small, that to take their opi-
nions as the sense of the county, would be madness. Let us,
in driller to understand the term, agree to call those the gentry
of the county, who are liable to serve on the grand juries
of the county ; •of such men, we think we are liberal, when
we estimate them at a quarter of a hundred--a score, we believe,
is nearer/the mark, but tslimporte. Next for the freeholders, a
class whom we consider of more real consequence, in regard to
any public question, than either the radical aristocracy,or squire-
archy ; and of these we shall find a woeful deficiency.— The
whole meeting, on the estimate of one not at all inclined to tie-
grade the cause, consisted of about 1,000 people; weave assured
that this is an extreme calculation ; of these, not less than 000,
perhaps more, were residents iii Stownutrket, who came to see
the shew, as they do when Punch exhibits in the market, or the
learned Pig grunts wisdom to the mob. If we admit that
one fourth of the remaining four hundred have votes for the
county, we think we accord more than' the .fact, and then,
gentle and simple, we shall find about 125 persons ready to
vote for Parliamentary Reform. We frankly admit, that we have
no data, by which to prove the accuracy of our estimate, but
a. few trifles may serve to shew, that we cannot be far
from the truth. County Meetings are held at Stow-market for
the purpose of enabling the inhabitants of the two principal
towns, Bury anti Ipswich, to meet, as it stands mid-way be-
tween what may be called two County towns. Now, we have
pretty accurate information, and we cannot enumerate
twenty-four persons out of both towns, who were present
at the Aleeting their joint population is twenty-four thou-
sand. The innkeepers at Stowinarket, did not find the day so
advantageous as some market days. Neither post-horses nor
gigs were in requisition : but four pair of horses passid
trough the turnpike on the principal road, during the whole
morning, The weather did not deter people from travelling,
for the Morning was remarkably fine, although about noon it
began to rain, and continued wet during' the remainder of the
day. There was no crowding round the waggon on which the
orators exhibited; people walked about at their ease under
their umbrellas, and now and then stopped and listened. The
" unanimity, order, and firmness," of the Suffblk Chronicle,
was apathy and listkstineas in the hearers, mortification and
disappointment in the speakers and leaders. These things will
!thew whether we were not justified in saying that the County
did not wish for a meeting.; and whether we are guilty of mis-
representation in pronouncing the whole proceeding a,palpable
contrivance, to serve an obvious purpose, which has miserably
failed, to die manifest discomfiture of its contriver.
4%11' Here follows sonic pertinent, spirited, and judicious
comments on the chief speakers at a Meeting, the substance
of which we have already given. As, however, the Party
Prints have endeavoured to aliew that Mr. npocii is a Prose-
lyte to Opposition, we subjoin what the Editor of The Bury
Gazette says respecting that Gentleman:—
".The speech of Mr. Gooch needs no remark, practical
sound sense and plain English feeling are its characteristics.
He involves himself in no labyrinth of sophiatications —he tells
plain truth in plain terms—he stands before a part of his con.
atinients, violently politically opposed to him, in all the se-
curity of conscious rectitude ; ready to defend overy'act of his
public life, and manfully reply to his accusers, Such conduct
cannot but be appreciated by Englishmen, and we are proud
to record another instance in which our valuable representative
has singly ventured to stem the torrent of faction, and like Mr.
Edmond Wodehouse at Norwich, and Mr. Stuart Wortley at
York, sturdily maintained his ground against the congregated
force of radicalism!"

SPRING ASSIZES.
LANCASTER, APRIL 7.
BREACH OF PROMISE OF MARRIAGE.
HIBBERT V. BARROW.
This was ail action brought to recover a compensation in da-
mages for the injury sustained by the plaintiff', by reason of the
defendant refusing to perform a promise of marriage, which it
was alleged hebad made to her. The damages were laid at logo/.
Mr. Bnouoits Ai stated the case for the plaintiff. The plain-
tiff, Miss Hibbert, was the daughter of a hatter residing at Fails-
worth, near Manchester; the defendant was a publican at the
same place ; he was himself the owner of a public-house, and
was a man in opulent circumstances. The parties were, there-
fore, i
pretty much on a par with respect to their station n life,'
and he'believed equarin point of age. The intimacy between
them had subsisted for a considerable time, and it unfortu-
nately happened that the plaintiff relying more than she ought
to have done on the honour and the repeated promises of the
defendant, had been induced to surrender her virtue—a cir-
cumstance which did not form a material part of the present
case, but might he made the ground of a separate complaint.
After being deluded' by reiterated promises of marriage, and
put off from time to time by the defendant, her hopes of that
union which he had led her to expect, were at length totally
blighted by the marriage of the defendant with another wo-
man, with whom he received a considerable portion, anti no-
thing was left to the plaintiff but that compensation which she
Was seeking, and which he trusted she would receive at the '
hands of Jury.
Ann Ogden, wife of David Ogden, of Failsworth, had known
the plaintiff for a long time ; her father was a hatter. Knew
the defendant, who was a publican at Failsworth. The 'plain-
tiff' and the defendant had been intimate for 12 or 14 years.—
Witness was in her father's house with them in the year 1818;
they were talking together; defendant said if ever lie was mar-
, ried to any woman it would be to her; he repeated this twice.
He afterwards asked her to go out at the door, he had a few
words. to say to her, which he did not wish any one else to hear.
He took hold of her hand and led her to the door, and said she
and he must be married very soon. She had a child several years
ago ; she was 30 years of age, and he either 32 or 33.. fr Cross-examined by Mr. iwasis—Pray, Mrs. Ogden,
what is the age of your oldest child ?—Twelve years.
And your second P—About eight.
, And your third ?—lt is dead ;it would have been three if it
had lived.

And pray, 31a'am, when were you married 2—About two
years ago. •
Bless me ! had you all those children before you were mar-
ried ?..:-Yes, Sir.
What was the age of Miss Hibbert's child when the conver-
sation took place which you haVe mentioned ?—Between two
and three years.
Re-examined—The defendant married a Miss Simpson, did
he noti?--Ares, Sir.
And old Simpson built him a public-house ?—Yes, Sir.
Miss Hibbert's father never did build him a public-house,
did he P—No.

Mr. BROUOIIAM—Aye, that's the difference, you know, be-
tween the two ladies.
Charles Stott produced a certificate of the defendant's mar-
riage, which took place on the 2241 of August, 1822. Served
defendant with the writ in this action. Ile said he had paid
money enough on account of the child ; he did not want to
pay any more.
Mr. WI LUAUS, for the defendant, contended, that before the
plaintificould recover in this action, the Jury must be convinced
not only that the words imputed to the defendant were really
uttered by him, but also that they were understood by the
parties at the time to be a distinct promise of marriage binding
upon both. And what were the witnesses who were called to
prove this notable case ? There was the particular friend, the
intimate associate of the plaintiff, who came shamelessly into
the box, and admitted that she had had three bastard children
before marriage. What sort of reliance could they place upon
her testimony, when they saw such a laxity in that point of
morality which was so essential to a female ? Even if they be.
lieyed the promise, of which evidence was given, what did
it amonnt.to ? The defendant led the plaintiff to the door,
and whispered in her ear some idle words, which just as
much amounted to a legal and binding promise of marriage, as
jum ping over a broomstick constituted a binding ceremony.—
It was in evidence, that the connection between the parties had
subsisted for years, and that so long as the defendant remained
unmarried, the plaintiff' did not give herself any trouble about it.
" Cursed be all laws but those which Love has made,"
would, he supposed, have been her motto, if ever she had read
the Poet, so long as she could live in a state of concubinage
with the defendant. But when he got married—when this
sinner became publican—she was inflamed with the sight of his
icr
neybremaidglitofbephrroomt firsoemof hnirar,rituiaged
house—sheshe
se
herself
prov
by the testimony of that witness Whom they bad heard, but
who, he .trusted, they would not believe.
Mr. Justice 11oLuovn summed up, and the Jury returned
a verdict for the defendant.

TAUNTON.
George Clerk, the coachman of a Bristol and Bath coach,
was tried under the new Act of Parliament, for manslaughter,
in having furiously driven a coach so that it was upset, and a
person named James Hamilton. Jailed.
The Counsel who conducted the prosecution, in stating the
case to the Jury, urged the necessity of visiting those to whom
the safety of the lives and limbs of so many of his Alajesty's
subjects was intrusted, with severe punishment, whenever by
their carelessness either was lost or endangered.
The first witness called was Jr. Smart, who stated that on
the evening of the 14th of February last he started from Bristol
to go to Bath in the coach of which the prisoner was the driver.
The witness described the manner in which the prisoner drove
on the several, parts of the road when the deceased with his
nephew got up. The prisoner appeared to be in liquor, and
as they went on he whipped the horses furiously. As he
drove through the turnpike-gate near Bristol, he nearly ran
against the gate. The nephew of the deceased told the pri-
soner he had " skimmed it near." One of the passengers
told him if he drove so fast he" would upset the coach : hut the
priSoner kept increasing his violence on the horses. He in-
creased the speed very little, for the coach was going at such
a rate, that to increase the speed a great deal was impossible.
After they had palsied' the bridge which goes over the Avon,
about 100 yards, the coach was upset by the furious driving.
The coach was not upset, in witness's opinion, by running
against any thing. It was running straight when it was upset.
All were thrown off' the top. Witness saw the deceased, and
thought his skull, was fractured. The prisoner requested as.
sistance in getting the coach to rights, but witness gave no
assistance. lie was too much bruised about himself. The
deceased was carried to Bath. The coach was going at the
rate of about fourteen miles an hour, when it was upset.—
There were four passengers' at the time inside, and eight
outside. The coach swung'from side to side as it went along.
John Anthony, appther passenger, said, after he had been
on the coach some tune, he thought the prisoner had been
drinking exceedingly. The coach drove furiously on, and
witness felt very uncomfbrtable at the time, and thought him-
self in danger. He requested a person who was talking to the
prisoner not to speak to him or divert his attention from the
horses. •

Mr. Ackland, a surgeon at Bath, stated, that on the 14th of
February he found the deceased labouring under a very severe
wound. After lingering► a considerable time, he died from the
effects of a fracture on the base of the skull, as the witness
ascertained afterwards.

Mr. Smith, of the White Hart inn, Bath, proved that the
deceased, on the night the coach was upset, was brought in in
a state of insensibility, and languished there until he died.
The defence set up in behalf of the prisoner was, that a spring
had broken accidentally on the road, and thereby thrown it on
one side, so that it upset. A witness proved that the coach
arrived at the White Bart inn with one of the springs broken off;
but on his cross-examination it turned out that this spring had
been broken before, and Was only mended by a thin piece of
iron. On the re-examination of all the passengers, there ap-
peared to be.no reason for believing that it might not have been
broken by the coach oversetting.
Some witnesses gave the prisoner a good character for hu-
manity._ •

The Jury immediately found the prisoner—Guilty.
Mr. Justice BURROUGII, in passing sentence on the .
soner, observed that by a recent act of Parliament he was
empowered to sentence him to transportation for life; but
as this was the first instance which his Lordship knew of,
of a conviction for the offence of furiously driving, he did
not think it •necessary to visit him with the full measure
of punishment which the law enabled him to inflict, and
he should impose a more lenient punishment, in the hopes
that that would operate as a first warning to those of his
class. Ili* Lordship, however, couldnot help observing,
that a great portion of the evil was occasioned by the
inattention of the proprietors themselves, who encouraged this
system of driving furiously, for the 'purpose of out-stripping
each other, and getting more money by perforMing journeys in
a shorter time: Such itiate of travelling as 12 gr 14 miles an
hour by a coach laden with passengers, was a rate which could not
be sanctioned, tor it was dangerous and illegal, and those who
adopted it must be aware, for they did it at their peril. lle was
afraid itowever,they would go on dnving;faster and faster, until by
repeated accidents it became necessary to put a stop to the sys,
tem, by sentencing those who in the pursuit of it occasioned the
dctith of any of his Majesty's subjects, to be transported for
life. His Lordahip sentenced the prisoner to be imprisoned for
' 12 months in the County Gael, and during that time to be kept
to hard labour at the treadrnill.—There were niany Jams in
Court, amongst whom the conviction andienteuce appeared
to excite a strong sensation,

FOR THE SUN.

CATHOLIC E3IANCIPATION.,-PROTESTItNT

SUBJECTION.

P,L E °
ThetioPusE r EC
Na
Gt
11L
cD !
CausesW ecroemaerse yoonu
nP etthie-
House of CoMmons in a few days, and ifyou coo-
tinue to sleep while it is carried,'you will be
wakened in a few months to the greatest afflic-
tion which ever befel this land. Do you mean
that Englhnd should be the slave of Ireland ?
Protestant England sacrificed to Catholic Ire-
land 41—Your Altars and your Throne trampled
upon by Popish superstition and Popish Bulls !
Do you mean to let all the liberty of conscience
and of person which you enjoy—which your
forefathers gained for you with their blood, and
trafismitted in confidence to your keeping,
sported away without remonstrance or appeal,.
by those who should be foremost to maintain it--
by those who are sacredly 'entrusted by your
selves with the defence of it ?—llo you mean,
by your apathy and indifference, in the moment
of extreme danger, to put yourselves to the neces-
sity of contending again hereafter for the Consti-
tution which now shelters and is dear to your-
the Ascendancy which you now possess,
and must possess, or endure the worst of
tyranny—the tyranny of Papists ?—They are
prepared to execute it—they have begun.-
Look at your ill-fated Protestant brethren in
Ireland ; not one of them has escaped Catholic
hatred or Catholic outrage—thus tenements are
burned, thjir lands and crops destroyed—thus
persons murdered in cold blood—ell this is daill
and hourly transacting by Catholics. Look at tiee
unfortunate family of sixteen persons (the. Shee
vengefully beset, surrounded, and unrelentinglY,
burned in their homes, at midnight, by assemble°
hundreds of ruffians and savages. This was
by Catholics, and is the mercy which Catholpr
will shew Heretics (which is their ,ph trase
hew
Protestants), when they can get them in
power. Look at half a million of moneys
more,drained from the unwitting beneYolon"lo
an
public purse of this country to relieve those us;
by their conspiracies, and burnings, d devil
aio„
na
tions in Ireland, had reduced themselves t
their uniqforming neighbourhood to starvation
and disease. This too was Catholic worlfr-4/1,
the av
representation of the distress, Catholic—
tine
ministration of the funds, Catholic. book at
language of fervour,L---prelude to yourowo
,uts,
pression, now growing in daily vogue. The I
• be'
sessed 'raxes,are remitted who*, in !relent
,ea
cause Ireland is Catholic—Tithes are co nimie,%,,
in Ireland—" and it will please the. Calli?';
• forbidden
—the statue of King William is
of
he
to be dressed, the most glorious era
.e it
Constitution is snot to be celebrated, .1, I.:` ote,
should offend the Catholics! The Lord
Wove,
nant is insulted in consequence at the
which is usual enough for public actors tas:_a
and because the favouring of Catholics
.17C s I
wil'ho
the disturbance, the Protestant ntrendLer..
might deserve some punishment, are to nted
sated highireason, or tit least to be inn" Uc
re l°
a riot and conspiracy,—Grand Juries
lop
of Ca"
grossly insulted by the Irish Advocate ~.t). or
Supremacy (there is no punishment for
..";;I,:or
acquitting their consciences, and thr?: nit on
the Bill; the acquitted are again to u
their trial by virtue of the ex-offico and
the Jury will not unite to find them oil?twitit
they shall be threatened, notwithstantlin,l
9 open'
a THIRD prosecution for this trernendoku 0 _a;
of a glass bottle thrown by a
ntis n isfribe
benches violently rapped by gY may
bora
play and singing interrupted, oIY , at
the
astounded ; his Excellency alarmea
es, ilesa
44 awful" disturbance, and not the weakor
rs,ther
broken ; all this straining of the law,.
_„,,ation
no law, was for the.,sake of or at-the 105"b•treo
If e
of Catholics against Protestants• wher
frees
then people of England to continue fro.
0)&14,9
are your petitions against the
comma's.l,
every city, town, village, parish,
and individual among you ?
(To be continued.)

tFlliredWork respectably
wirrekcstiwmillicohf
... - --,------------:------ --------- ":-- ..„,.„ yerf
Earlfor yesterday morning a young "'"" ii,i,
Gardens,
an:ll\rei
requested
eskqeeudr:astpi
eop
dlif:dialmatabtleitAnhi.r;ol:llo,trit:ig3o:l-hasisi
sKiTiiryds. I‘....ortram,iti
e
fire
cal wheels, &c. might be sent to the 0011-in" bole
Fleet-street, (where he should be the ''bouiti
day),h et he
selected fire
, worksc
o nutbiten her of v°°,;:lfc.fPiellioctuil:
a directed to Mr. Smith ;he asked stileh 9 01?
then,
tobre whenabse theyl,
ce
:iefteerd butls. et:1:1i::
alone" it made no difference she ly"Id purporttake
he tendered a• live pounil note acing
in toYI;)e of the Bank of England, and nc't. Ist bp
change,-shewent for it to a' public-itonsdu note
would be " is
SUPP°Svdt SUSpeCting theturnej
be pronounced a forgery (which, ft the
out to be the
case), made a retreat, and ier 90,
note,
which is now in the possession f , 00
ordering
the fire-works, he said they w
celebrate
a wedding day at Brighton.

COAL-MARKET, Arita. - 011
Ships at Market. Ships sold 334 6,1 to 44i,4
611 Newcastle - 491 sas Oti ,„ 011
16i Sunderland . 16•
0 Scotch Coal n

On Tuesday.last,
den, surgeon in the
Richardson, of Oxford-s3trel o.
" t 4 Arclet
On ,t,t, OW 11,61 •
the 9th instant, at St. Bartliolomew-3.."- %no --
onlybald 31arlaurin, DI Somerset-linage, linage, to Mary. i, ,
daughter of Tho.ntas Rester, E.. Cloth
_,..-n,v, Chorl;:
On Tuesday, the ath instant,'at *St: Porierl 1 -of CIO
Mr. Justin 11PC
artily, to Miss Susanna Noarlani •
don-square. jillesPtiAcirtn.nitdaßlittnlrclunti).gpea'n'r?slget;lolll::ttt°3l:.:,

er
• t°
DIED. - . . 1 tetoe
At Brom t
‘,.....„ . 1; nn, yesterds/,, to
""11")1 aged 19, Eii b t ~ youngest daughter of ''
Mackintosh. 73 c '
74th cblabo 1 r 0 e ,
On Tuesday, '
in Albemarle street Charles ~a A,
of Chisholm ' ' 1 aged 4' 00‘'
,_ ~ q, in the County, of Roxburg it _t yris. inner
' neaumg, Berks.. on Satunlay the GtO In. 'l4 the J
win rlict f
Basingliall-Street), aged 49. . go'. .
, o the late tieorge 0;ot11110, .. be:
Temple, London re, ir
.the inexpressib c fr,:,,.. ja
On the 7th inst...
in wilmo_ t Brunoic.squal we'
OOld.sEitreet. . ii,ajleY Oste
On the llth inst., John Getnen, Est, of "-
' Mrs. —iLabe.tli Calt-vsetrret,er'elict of Alr• .139 g ' 0(
--,looll4.4l:ttit:e

Printed and Published for doe C
Pnoritt,- ph
Office, No. 112, Strand, by J. ft All9'