The Sun.
London, England, 1841-11-06 00:00:00

PUBLICATIONS.

Now ready, post Bro., price Es. cloth, with Maps and Plates,
NEW ZEALAND, SOUTH AUSTRA-
LIA, and NEW SOUTH WALES: a Record of
recant Travels in these Colonies, with especial reference to
Emigration, and the advantageous employment of Labour and
Capital. By R. G. JAMESON, Esq.
" An impartial and trustworthy view of the chief British
Colonies of the Southern ilemisphere."—Spectator.
London : Smith, E'v'er, and Co., 65, Cornhill.

BLACKWOOD'S STANDARD NO-
VELS. To be Published in Monthly Volumes,
Price Six shillings.

Juct published,
The ANNALS of. the PARISH, and the AYRSHIRE LE-
GATEES, by JOHN GALT, with a Portrait of the Author,
Engraved by Shaw, after Thomson ; and a BiographiCal Me-
moir by Delta.
" Altogether the work is well designed, well got up, and
well edited."—Spectator.
Printed for William Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh and
London ; and sold by all Booksellers.

On the 15th of November, in 3 vols. post Bvo., closely and
beautifully printed,
E N THOUSAND A-YEAR;
Carefully revised by the Author.
Wro. Blaclivrood and Sons 45, George-street, Edinburgl.
22, Pall Mall, London.

Now ready, 99 pp., Is., and may be had of all Booksellers by
an early application.
THE FARMERS' ALMANAC and CA-
LENDAR for 1842. By CUTHBERT W. JOHN-
SON, Esq. (Editor of the Farmers' Encycloptedia), and
WILLIAM SHAW, Esq., late Seeretary to the Royal Agri-
cultural Society of England. _
James Ridgway,Piccadilly ; and to be had in every Market-
town in the three kingdoms.

NEW WORK ON DEBILITY, &c.
Just published, price 45.; or sent by Post, free, 55.,
SELF-PRESERVATION ; a Popular Essay
on the Concealed Causes of those obscure and neglected
Disorders of the Generative System, originating in certain
solitary habits, youthful excesses, or infection, and terminating
in Nervous Debility, Local or Constitutional Weakness, Gonorr-
hoea, Syphilis, Indigestion, Insanity, and Consumption. With
Practical Observations on MARRIAGE, and on the Ana-
tomy, Physiology, and Diseases of the Reproductive Organs,
with plain directions for their perfect Restoration.
By SAMUEL LA'MERT, CONSULTING SURGEON,
21, FALKNER-STREET, MANCHESTER,
Matriculated Member of the University of Edinburgh, Hono-
rary Membel• of the London Hospital Medical Society, Li-
centiate of Apothecaries' Hall, London, &c. &c.
Published by the Author, and sold in London by S. Gilbert,
26, Paternoster-row ; Courier Office, 4, St. Ann's-square, and
Lewis, Market-street, Manchester; Newton, Bookseller,
Church-street, Liverpool ; Watts, Snow-hill, Birmingham ;
Cornish. 159, Briggate Leeds; Fryer, New Bond-street,
Bath ; Healey, Cheltenham ; Independent Office, Cambridge;
and by all Booksellers.
The various positions of Lover, Husband, and Parent, which
the world are severally anxious to fulfil, are the inherent privi-
leges of mankind, and but for the accidents of mortality would
be awarded equally to all. To such, among others, this essay
addresses itself; and, by its perusal, many questions may be
satisfactorily adjusted, that admit of no appeal, even to the
most confidential friend. To fan the spark of hope, to dissi-
pate groundless alarm, to restore failing confidence, and point
to the means of securing a happy old age, is no trifling n.com-
mendation of an effort directly tending to the social and moral
welfare of all classes of the community.
Mr. La'Mert is to be consulted daily, at his residence, and
Country Patients are requested, in their letters, to be as mi-
nute as possible in the detail of their symptoms, age, general
habits of living, and occupation in life. The communication
must be accompanied by the usual Consultation Fee of 1/..
without which no notice whatever can be taken of their appli-
cation; and in all cases the most inviolable secrecy may be re-
lied on. 21, Falkner -street, Manchester.

MARRIAGE.
New and Enlarged Edition (in an Envelope), price 55.,
by post 6s. 6d.,
MARRIAGE—Its Intent, Obligations, and
Physical and Constitutional Disqualifications, Medically
considered; with Essays on Hereditary Health, and on many
of the Caicealed Infirmities of Human Life. To which is
added, the Confessional—comprising. details of Melancholy,
Nervousness, and Feeble Health, arising from Care, Grief
Anxiety, Dissipation, Gourmandism, Corpulency, Love, and
Religion, with numerous Engravings, &c., the entire forming
a series of interesting, original, and important Papers, ad-
di essed especially to those approaching and arriving at Pubert7
and Manhood, and called " PROFESSIONAL RECORDS.

By a PHYSICIAN.
Sherwood, 23, Paternoster-row; Carvalho•l47, Fleet-street;
Smith, 5, Liverpool-street. City ; Hannay, 63, Oxford-street;
39, Cornhill ; and all Booksellers.

THE WHOLE CHARTER FOR A HALFPENNY.
ASK FOR THE
ENGLISH CHARTIST CIRCULAR
PRICE ONE HALFPENNY !
" This noble, though humble, ally in the glorious cause of
the People is, we are happy to perceive, pursuing its onward
march, and, if properly encouraged, cannot fail must efficiently
to aid in the cause of right and justice. The number before
us (25), besides other highly interesting matter, contains the
" People's Charter" entire. Thus every working-man, for the
charge of a single halfpenny, can procure for himself and family
an authentic copy of this most—this all-important document;
and we sincerely trust that the whole of the masses w ill gladly
avail themselves of the opportunity, and that all working-men
will aid in its circulation."—Northern Star.
The Work can be had in Monthly Parts, 6d. each.
'l4 In the current Numbers of this Work, Memoirs of
Muir, Emmett, and Lord E. Fitzgerald will be found, with
stirring Articles on THE REPEAL OF THE UNION, &c.
London : Cleave, Shoe-lane, Fleet-street; and all Booksel-
lers and Newsmen.

PARR'S LIFE PILLS.
TO THE PUBLIC.
No sooner is a Medicine well established in public favour
than a host of imitators arise, who, for the sake of gain, not
only wrong the Proprietors of the genuine Medicine, but inflict
a serious injury on the unwary purchaser of their base counter-
feit trash. These observations apply with increasad effect to
the Medicine which is now so well known as " PARR'S
LIFE PILLS." This famous remedy has been established
by undoubted proofs of its efficacy, and by a mass of evidence
and testimonials which no other medicine ever yet called forth.
These facts have had the effect of producing a very large sale
—more than 15,000 boxes per week. When this large sale
came to the knowledge of some unprincipled persons, they, for
the sake of gain to themselves, and reckless of the injury it may
do to• others, attempted to foist on the incautious various
imitations, supported by statements which exhibit the most un-
blushing effrontery. In order that purchasers may be able to de-
tect these frauds, care must be taken to look at the Government
Stamp pasted round each box, and be sure it has the words
" Parr's Life Pills," in white letters on a red ground, engraved
therein, and forms part of the stamp ; also that the name of
" Mr. Edwards, 67, St. Paul's, London," is printed, as W hole-
sale Agent, on the directions wrapped round each box.
Ask for " Parr's Life Pills," and inquire for the little book
containing the Life of Old Parr, thirty-two pages, with engrav-
ings, also the numerous testimonials, which may be had gratis
on application of all agents and respectable venders throughout
the United Kingdom.
As a proof of their efficacy the Proprietors refer to the follow-
ing Extraordinary Cure of Confirmed Asthma selected from
hundreds of a similar nature :
Mrs. Joseph Simpson has been severely afflicted, for the iast
thirty years, with a violent cough and difficulty of breathing.
The affliction has been so severe that she could not fulfil her
usual domestic obligations. She took cold when only fifteen
years old, and the cough never left her till she took Parr's Life
Pills. She had tried almost every kind of medicine, and had
taken laudanum in large quantities, but nothing afforded relief.
She heard of Parr's Pills about last Christmas, and as soon
as she had taken about halt a box she found herself completely
cured, and was never afflicted in the slightest manner during
the severe weather that followed, and is now better in health
than she has ever been in her life.
This cure does indeed appear miraculous ; but for the satis-
faction of the most incredulous, she has kindly consented to an-
swer any inquiries, either by personal application, or by letter,
addressed to Mrs. Joseph Simpson, Church-hill Close, Old
Lenton, near Nottingham.
The medicine is sold wholesale by appointment of the pro-
prieters by Edwards, 67, St. Paul's, London, in boxes at Is. lid.,
L 2s. 9d., and Ifs. each.

COURT OF-CHANCERY, .Nov.
The LORD CHANCELLOR took bankrupt petitions, lu-
natic petitions, and appeals to-day. -
BOOTH V. CRESWICK.
In this case, in which there was a motion and a peti-
tion, upon the application of Mr. Stuart they were both
ordered to come on together.
CARTER V. NELSON, A WARD.
Mr. DANIEL said he was instructed to apply to his.
Lordship in this case for the direction of the Court, in
consequence of the circumstances that had taken place..
The petition was presented shortly before the present
term by the father of a young lady, complaining that
she had been removed to improper custody, and had
been improperly detained by the respondent. On.
the first day of term, the petition being then
on the paper of the Vice-Chancellor of England, the
counsel on behalf of the petitioner applied to the Court
for the purpose a having a day fixed for the parties to
attend his Honour. The Vice-Chancellor having fixed
Wednesday morning, the parties attended, and as it was
considered a case necessary to be heard in private the
matter came on in his Honour's private room. The
matter of the petitioner was opened, the affidavit of the
father on behalf of the petitioner was opened also, and his
Honour questioned the young lady in private. The Court
having heard the matter of the petitioner, ordered that it
should stand over till Wednesday next, and that in the
mean time the custody of the young lady should be retained
by the respondent. Subsequently it was ascertained that
the petition had been, in fact, transferred to the paper
of Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce.
Mr. ROUPEL—NO, it had not been transferred ; it
was put on Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce's paper by
mistake.
Mr. DANIEL—It appeared on the paper of Vice-Chan-
eellor Knight Bruce; and wa. struck out when called 611.
'no party appeftvint;. ['niter these -circumstances it was
supposed, on the part of the respondent, that than,
might be some difficulty, because it was feared it alight
be said that the petition, having been transferred to the
paper of Vice-Chancellor Bruce, the Vice-Chancellor of
England had no authority to make the order he had
done. • Under these circumstances he had been in-
structed. to 'apply to the Court for its direction.
The LORD CHANCELLOR wished to know whether the
petition was transferred before the question came on
before the Vice-Chancellor of England.
Mr. DANIEL said that he had been instructed that
such was the fact; it was stated upon affidavit.
The Lord CHANCELLOR said he had been told that
that was not very probable, because it had been arranged
that the Vice-Chancellor of England should take the
old petitions, of which this was one.
Mr. DANIEL WAS SO instructed.
Mr. ROUPEL, on behalf of the petitioner, submitted
that the application was not only irregular but unneces-
sary. It proceeded upon the assumption that the petition
had been transferred to the paper of Vice-Chancellor
Knight Bruce. It was true that the petition had ap-
peared on the paper of that Learned Judge, but it had
been put there by mistake, and upon its being called on
it was struck out upon that fact being stated to the Court.
Such being the facts, he submitted it bad been properly
heard by the Vice-Chancellor of England,' and disposed
of by that Learned Judge.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said it was clear that it was
properly on the paper of the Vice-Chancellor of England,
and had been by mistake put into that of Vice-Chancellor
Knight Bruce. His Lordship thought that if inquiry
had been made by the clerk of Mr. Daniel, that mistake
might have been discovered.
Mr. ROUPEL observed that no party disputed the
order of the Vice-Chancellor of England, and he sub-
mitted, therefore, that he was entitled to the costs of the
present application.
Mr. DANIEL said, that his client was anxious to ob-
tain the direction of the Court ; and, under such circum-
stances, he trusted the Court would not visit him with

the costs.
The LORD CHANCELLOR, considering that if inquiry
had•been made by Mr. Daniel's client, he would have
ascertained that the petition had been properly heard
by the Vice-Chancellor of England, ordered him to
pay the costs of the present application.

IN THE MATTER OF BLAKE, A BANKRUPT,

This case came before the Court upon appeal from the
lodgment of the Court of Review. The only question
in the case was whether a creditor who had a debt due
from the bankrupts individually, and also a debt due to
him from the bankrupt jointly with another person, and
who had sued out a fiat of bankruptcy, was entitled to
prove and receive dividends out of the separate estate of
the bankrupt as well in respect of the joint as the sepa-
rate debt, or whether the circumstance of the separate
debt being sufficient to sustain the fiat precluded the
creditor from proving against the separate estate for the
joint debt. The Court of Review decided that the
creditor was only entitled to prove for the separate debt,
and from that decision the party appealed.
Mr. SWANSTON and Mr. GIRDLESTONE appeared in
support of the appeal, and Mr. BETHELL was Counsel
for the party in whose favour the Courrof Review had
given judgment.
The LORD,CHANCELLOR, at the conclusion of the ar-
guments, postponed giving judgment.
IN THE CASE OF SWINDELL, A LUNATIC.
The remainder of the day was occupied in the opening
of this lunatic petition, which had not concluded when
the Court rose.

ROLLS' COURT, Nov, 5.
JENKINS V. BRYANT.
Mr. PEMBERTON moved on behalf of Mr. Bull a
solicitor, to discharge an 'order to him as soli
of the plaintiff to deliver his bill, and all the b
and papers in the cause, to the plaintiff. It ap-
peared that the parties had entered into an engagement
with the solicitor not to employ any other person in the
suit in that capacity ; and his Lordship, after hearing
the facts of the case, which related to an annuity, granted
the order.

SELVES V. SELVES.
Mr. PE3II3ERTON, on behalf of the plaintiff, moved to
transfer a fund remaining in Court in this cause. A
testator by his will, bearing date in the year 1802,
directed the income of a sum of 1,7001. to be paid to
Edward Selves for his life, and after his death to be
transferred to his children, and divided between them
share and share alike, as they should respectively attain
the age of 25 years. Edward Selves died in 1824, and
it was now prayed that the remainder of the fund, which
had been reduced to 1,3371. by various decrees of the
Court, should be divided, in their respective proportions
among such of the children as had attained the age of 25
His LORDSHIP granted the order, which was not op
posed.

KEMP V. HILL.
Mr. PEMBERTON moved for an order to Mr. Rowson,
solicitor for the trustees of a gentleman named La
Bruyere, to deliver up certain deeds and papers relating to
the estate devised by him, which were detained by Mr.
Rowson, for a lien which he claimed to have upon them.
His LORDSHIP, after hearing the facts in suppport of
the petition, suggested that the deeds should be placed
in the custody of the Court, and that it should be re-
ferred to the Master to ascertain whether Mr. Rowson
had any and what lien upon them, but that they should
not go out of the custody of the Court, without notice to
Mr. Rowson ; to which arrangement Mr. Walker as-
sented, on the part of Mr. Rowson.

GURDEN V. BADCOCK.

• Mr. PEMBERTON moved for an order that Samuel
Deacon, the executor of the receiver in this suit, should
within a week pay into Court the several sums of
6431. 18s. 3d. and 3491. Os. 9d., making together the sum
of 992/. 195., together with interest on the same, and the
costs of the application. The Learned Counsel said Mr.
Deacon was the surviving representative of the receiver
in the cause, and as such, was ordered many years ago
to pay the above sum into Court; which, however, he
never did, but had suggested many excuses for not doing
so, which had proved to be unfounded.
The bill was filed by Benjamin Gurden and Thomas
Shillingford, tenants for life of an estate left by a gentle-
man named Smithers, which he had charged with various
payments, among which was an annuity to Mary Saun-
ders. On the Bth of July, 1806, an order was made to
appoint a receiver of the estate, in consequence of which
Mr. William Drayson was appointed receiver. Mr.
Drayson passed two accounts to the year 1807, and paid
the balance into Court, and by a decree made in the
cause in February, 1808, he was continued as receiver.
Mr. Drayson died in 1809, and appointed his widow and
Samuel Deacon to be his executors ; and on the 16th of
June, 1812, application was made to the Court on their
behalf, praying that they might be at liberty to pay such
accounts of the receiver as were not passed, and in pur-
suance of the orders thereupon made the Master made
two reports, by which it was found that the above
sum of 992/. 19s. was due from them as the representa-
tives of the receiver. The Master subsequently made his
general report, and thereby found that a considerable
sum of money was due to Mary Saunders, and these re-
ports were confirmed on November 10, 1813. On Sth
December the case came on for further directions, and it
was then decreed that the rents of the estate were littble
to keep down the interest. The suit had been ptose-
cuted in a negligent manner ; Mrs. Saunders, who: died
in 1839, never got anything that was due to her,
and upon her death her representatives applied for
and obtained the conduct of the suit. Application
was subsequently made to Mr. Deacon, for pay-
ment of the above sums, in answer to which he stated
that he had paid it to Mr. Kirby, the solicitor in the
cause, and that it was detained by him in part of his
account. It was contended that the order of the Court
had not been complied with, and it was, therefore, prayed
that it might forthwith be carried into effect.
Mr. RUSSELL and Mr. Romna.v, on behalf of Mr.
Deacon, complained that this proceeding should have
been instituted against their client, after so long time
had elapsed, especially when it was not denied that he
bad not derived any benefit from the estate, and when
all the evidence went to show that, though he had not acted
in the regular manner, yet he had acted with the consent
of all the parties concerned, and that the money had
been received by the parties entitled to receive it, though
not in the manner decided by the Court.
MS LORDSHIP desired defendant's counsel to examine
the orders, and said he would hear Mr. Pemberton's re-
Ay to-morrow.

- -
VIOE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Nov. 5.
(Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND.)
His Honour was occupied the whole day with unop-
posed petitions, short causes, and cause petitions, none
of which possessed the slightest public interest.