The Sun.
London, England, 1824-11-18 00:00:00

CAItROLL'S NEW SCHEME.

TilouGti this Scheme has been compara-
tively
.but a few hours before the Public, it has excited
the deepest interest ever remembered in the history of Lotte-
ries. ale number anti magnitude of the great Prizes—the ea).
nomy of the adventure—the clearness and simplicity of the
plan—have all combined to render it the favourite object of
Public Patronage. The Scheme has been published at Rill
length in every Paper, and may be obtained gratis at CAR-
ROLL'S, the Contractor's,- Offices,
,CORNIIILL;
20, OXFORD-STREET;
7, CIIARING CROSS.
To those Persons who have not already seen the Scheme,
the Contractor submits the folloWing brief epitome of its lead-
ing features :..-there are
TWO - Prizes of - £30,000
TWO - Prizes of • £20,000
besides other Capitals and smaller Prizes, amounting in the
whole to Two Hundred and Six Thousand Pounds b'terling
Money, so divided as not to leave a single Number without a
Benefit.

TWO - of - .C-20,000
And 1,000 other Prizes, are sure to be Drawn the First Day,
16th December,
And may be obtained at a risks') unprecedentedly small as to
excite the surprize of all who have seen the plan—for after
taking the Chance of the First- Day, £lO may be received back
for every Ticket, and in proportion for Shares, whether the
Number be drawn or undrawn. By this offer, the immense sum
of Three Hundred and 'rwenty-four Thousand Pounds is ac.
tually added to the Pries Money of the First Day, as it must
be clear, that every Purchaser has the option of making his
Number un £lO Prize us sown as. that Day's Drawing is over ;
if he be successful, he may gain (and somebody must gain)
4:20,000 or more—and if unsuccessful, he cannot lose more than
£4 19s. by a Whole Ticket
Half - £3 501 Eighth - - • £0 10 0
Quarter • 4EI 13 6 1 Sixteenth - £0 9 6
Being the difference between what a Ticket will cost, and what
may be` received back for it any time before the 26th of De-
cumber.
CARROLL'S great Luck in Selling Thirty and Twenty
Thousand Pound Prizes is well known ; but he abstains from
particularizing them at this moment, as he is more anxious to
press on the attention of Adventures what he hopes- to do for
them in 'the coming Scheme, than what he has done for them
in past Lotteries,

RED DEK4t.
11TANT ED to Stock a PARE, both STAGS
V and HINDS, for which a rood price will lie given.
Apply to Mr. Peat, Saddler, Piccadilly, London.

PATRONISED BY THE 11-OKOURABLE THE NAVY

BOA RI.
GiIUBR'S PATENT DETECTOR LOCK.

TIE Hon. Sir GEO. GREY,, Bart.,
(the Commissioner), and the Principal Offiecre of His
Majesty's Dock Yard, Portsmouth, have given the Patentee
permission to publish the following Statement.of Facts relative
to his PATENT DETECTOR LOCK; namely, That have
ing, by order of the Honourable Navy Board, lately supplied
a considerable number of his Patent Detector. Locke for the
use of the Portsmouth Dock Yard, and 'being informed that
there was a Convict on board one of the prison-ships at this
port, who was notorious for picking Leeks, (being by profes-
con a Lock Maker, and who hie, till recently, for several
years been chiefly employed in pickiug anti rep:tering Locks in
London), the Patentee requested the favour of Commiseimier
the Honourable Sir George Orem genttur
.this titan, that he
might exercise his skill in atteamting to pick his Lock; and
the Commissioner having been pleased to acquiesce in this re-
quest, the man was sent for accordingly, and one of Chubb's Pa:,
tent Locks was submitted to his inspection, at the Storekeeper's
Office, in the presence of several of the Principal Officers ; when,
after a tewetul examluation, he said, " he thought he could
pick or open it with false instruments." He was therefore fur-
nished with files, and all the tools he stated to be necessary to
prepare the instruments for his purpose ; and was directed to
give notice to the Storekeeper when he should be • ready to
make the trial, for the promotion of whidi a Reward of
Five Pounds was promised him it' he suceeeeled. In about
three weeks after this time, he sent to say that he was
ready ; and, a time being fixed on for the purpose, he cont..
menced his operations in endeavouring to pick one of the Locks,
in the presence of the Principal Officers of the Duck-yard;''
but he could not succeed. lie then stated, " that his failure
was in consequence of his instruments not exactly fitting the'
Lock." To remove this hupediment, the Patentee offeted to
supply him with some blank keys, which should fit two of the'
Locks' in order to his melting another trial ; these were fur-
nished accordingly, together with a Lock exactly the same in
principle and in kind as those lie had been trying, so that he
might examine its construction, and make himself master of
its principle. Shortly after be made Whether attempt to pick
two of the Locks, in the presence of the Honourable Sir
George Grey, and the Principal Officers of the Dock-Yard :
his success in this attempt was not better than 'the tirst ; but
he overlifted the Detector of each Lock. Sir ( ieorge Grey then
asked him, what he would do In this case, supposing. he had
been making an attempt on such a Lock, with an went to cone.
mit a robbery.? He said, " I would go no more to the Lod:,
ever would set a watch and catch Me." He still thought,lioive
ever, that, by a further alteration the instruments he could
yet succeed ; more time was therefore given him, end even,
facility afthrtled him. Smile time afterwards he agaiu repeated
his climes, in the presence of the same Gentlemen; but having,
in his previous experiments, overlifted the Detectors, he; could
not by any means disengage them ; this was done for him seve-
ral tunes, with the Keys belonging to the hocks ; but, as often
as they were regulated, on every successive trial. he detected'
them again ; at last he leave them up, saying, `.`''!'hat he
had used his utmost ability to Lis repeated attempts, and could
not succeed : that Ulm Locks were the most secures ever
met with, and that lie. did not think it possible for any man to
pick or open them with any false instruments whatever. •
• The Patentee of the above Lock, in Making the following
observations, disclaims .any Intention of depreciating the merits
their insecurity : but treete the Detector Lock will entitle -him
by; deecrihing their defects, of demonstrating
of other Looks,
to a share in the attention and patronage of the Public ; as it
possesses, in a much higher degree than ally other, the four
principal requisites of a eerul Lock; viz. SECURITY, SlM-
which not erly`it imposeible to be picked
false
PLICIT V, STRENGTH..and DURABILITY. Its SE-
CA/ rt ur Y. particularly, 14 leeeeesedeaeyeue, enieteeenewey an
or otieneif instruments, but also detect,. the firerimprovement,any.
attempt to open it ; h h
teereee preventing those repeated eflhrts,
to which even the best Locks hitherto invented are exposed. In
these Locks, the combinations admit of so great variety, that
millions of them may be made, and yet one Key shall not-pass
any two-Locks; and the Detector renders that variety infinite:
for the instant that one or more of the tumblers are lifted beyond
the place where the bolt is' at liberty to pass, it overlifts the De-
tector, which then hooks the cull at the bolt, preventing it from
passing, and thus gives incalculable additional security, (as. well
us immediate notice, the first time the titre key is put into it to
open it, that an attempt has been made to pick it,) and renders
all farther attempts useless; it being impossible to di cover the
first combination. to disengage the Detector, or the' second, to
remove the bolt ; and nothing but the true key can either re.;
lease the Detector from its gram) cm the bolt; 'or open the Lock.
In reference to Its 1)1.7I(Aul 'ATV, it is not liable to be in.
,Jared by constant use in any length of time; this has been 'as-
certained, 14 an Iron-girt
emee luiving been attached to a
Steam-Enginiin the Dock-yard, • Po: smouth (to try the effect
of friction), by which it was locked and unlocked upwards of
four hundred and sixty thousand times, without receiving the
least injury. The STRENGTH of its parts, and the SIM-
PLICITY of its construction, are such, that no False Key,
or other Instrument, iptreduced into it for the purpose of open-
•ing It, can (without very great violence) injure it.
The Patent Detector Locks, of every size, and for all ; the
uses to which Locks can be needled, may be had of the Paten-
tee, CHARLES CBUBB, liereeee.
The Locks are also sold in London, by Illesrs. lye and Bur-
tlidge, 130, Fleet-street; Messrs. Bailey and Co. 30,-Cornhill ;
Mr. Phillips, M, High liolleoria; :11r. Colwell, 07, Haymarket;
Mre Howell, are New Bond-street ; Messrs. May and Morrett,
Ed, Oxford-street; Mr. Phillips, la, Camomile-street; Mr.
Hicks, 149, Borough ; Messrs. Ilancoene and 0, Skinner-
street, Snow-HUI • Messrs. Beobyer and Co. C0.,14, Stanhope-
street, Clare-Market ; elir. Downer, 155, Fleet-atreet ; Mr.
Benham, No: I, Edward-street, Portman-square ; Mr. Wilde,
99, WoOiLetreet, Cheapside ; Messrs. Payenter and Hawke,
178, Strand i Messrs. Adams and Morris, 11, Parlimmeht-
Street ; Messrs. Drury and Wilde, Castle-street, Liverpool ;
Mr. Raper, Leeds; Mr. Parlor, Lon:Ion-lane, Norwich; Mr.
"room, !lure St. Edmond's ; and tasty be had of the principal
lronmongete in the Kingdom.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, WEDNESDAY, Nov. 17.

DAVIDAttItICI: AND I,OltD CAMDEN.

r.erNt v. %O LE v.
This often tried case was introduced once more to his Lord.
ship this morning, by Mr. Ilan T..
It will be remembered that the celebrated actor, whose be-
is the subject of the present litigation, left It
In divided propertyportio ns between his wife, lira. Garrick, and other
to the latter, dm residue of his fortune, to-
relatives. To the former, an annuity a 1,6001. arising from a
fund of 50,0001.;
of ape. followed her husband in the
ruwatryteorof w.nibltmlitivtatihritrtryr:exicorsiru.oisenr.ofavtarhreeriic,te'kurrilytlbleeititule, acitiliirel idl trbiyiblisothwi;fea.n—d
nwilusxlappuinted trustee to execute the pro-
brother to the Roach's, be-
came entitled to the
The portion directed to be paid to Mrs.
at his demise bequeathed it among certain relatives, of whom
it)latertgroto.utinidis tih.utidty,tliteit:ee
bard
his sister, Mrs. rayue, the present plain:ill; was one. Mr. Hugh
vßiasiiolenys, clergyman,
oafthe
will.
be discharged before the legacies. After several applications
cPearytanien welaasintthanhedlinfrintbirlaerncoens on the property, which should
Ctohtahneceliturrimoafdee lalanncotZro,ithrtehceting the sum bequeathed to be
ipressteinuterteinalal:ne:
titlon this morning from that party, praying that the costs of
theseveraiproceedings has
maybtelo;se. id
011ultr.ofnaaftut
fund
' ing in the hitnds of the Court.
Mr. Psplrs opposed the petition. ilia client, Mr. Bailey,
had made no more opposition to Mrs. Payne., claims than he
was justified in making, by his duty of attending as trustee, to
the interests of other claimaws and incumbrancers on the
general tbnd t he ought not, therefore, to he compelled to pay
the costs of those proceedings, in which he was from the begin-,
ning a defensive agent. As trustee, he was rather entitled to
costs of his measures before the funds left his hands.
Mr. HART replied, lie trusted that his Lordship would
make the trustee pay the costs, as well through the considera-
tion fox his client, a destitute widow, as for an example to other
trustees.

The Low Citaxevt.min stated, that he could not mica-
Win whether Mr. Bailey had commuted an impropriey in re-
ference to thole proceeathip, without reading the “thiltait4,

His Lordship would look at them, and assured the Bar they.
should hear nothing of Garrick and Earl Camden after SatOr-
day morning.
EX rAwrt AtUOTTS, BANXRUPTS, WINE-MERCIIANTS.
Mr. Mormtou argued for the petitioners, whose certificate
was opposed by the house of Longhorn, creditor to the amount
of 72,000/. •
The Lonn CITANCELL(Mi, in commenting upon the case,
observed, that the law, as it now stood by, the protisions oft
'a' late /let of Parliament, allowed sound discretion to the
Lord Chancellor to entertain the prayer of a single creditor
in opposition to the certificate. The state of the law, to..
gether with the gperal practice as it stood before, formed
a subject of very Just complaint. At that. time, if. creditors
to a certain amount signed, the Chancellor must issue the
certificate. And this grievance he had himself "often felt at a
time when, from the altering nature of trade, there were many.
more bankruptcies than at present, that in cases of the most
profligate and corrupt bankruptcies, those creditors Who made
the greatest outcry were found, ninety-nine times out of a hun-
dred, to sign. first. • His LerdShip 'appeared to think that the
presenr case was one. peculiatly•fit. for the etercis.tt of tills new
discretion which was entrusted to biol. TOcae bankrupts bad
shown assets, nine months before Me connucsaion, which they
valued at 107,0001. Their certificate was signed.. by creditors,
whose claim amounted to 9;0001., and it was opposed by ,ope
creditor whose claim was 72,0001. Undoubtedly he could not
allow himself, 'by granting the certificate, to cifeet the entire
cancellation of so considerable a debt, while yet those erten; -
mous assets, which were said to be in existence nine months •
before, remained unaccounted for. lie 'would thereforerequire
the petitioners to make known to the Court what had: become
of those assets, and Ito would allow them to make any other.
affidavita which might cOntribute:to the'.perfect information of
the Court as to the reasons why they put this or that partieular
value upon the several items in that list, whether houses, tend,
ing stock, or other property.

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT. Nov. 17.
Thera was not any. business of Interest or importance in this
Court to-day. . , •

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Noy, 17.
THE Ellqa v. WESTWOOD.

This was a case respecting the mode of electing corporate
officers in the borough of -Wycombe. By the charter, those
officers should be elected by the burgesses at large; ,bitt.by
custom existing before the charter, and by a by.law made sub-
sequel-14, • the election has been conducted by the Common
Council, or select body of the burgesses. Two questions, there-
foreinrose : first, whether there can be a partial acceptance of a
charter; and second, whether, If there can.be no such accept-
ance, a by-law can be made to limit and controul its provisions.
These questions were now argued in the negative by. Mr. SCAR,.
L'EtTi. and in the affirmative by Mr. TINDAL . •
The CciußT took time to consider their judgment. ..