The Sun.
London, England, 1847-12-11 00:00:00

COIL MARKE'

[kiddie's W. Hartley 17s Od
Davison's West Hartley 17s 3d
Hasting's Bartley l7s Od
Holywell Main ..... 18s 6d
Londonderry Hartley l7s Od
New Tanfield l6s 6d
Ord's Redheugh
Original Pontop 15s 9d
South Peareth
Tanfield Moor 171 Od
Townley l6s 6d
West Wylam
West Hartley
Wylam l6s 9d
_ _ Wall's End, &c. _ _ _

Bewlace and Co l9s 9d
Brown's Gas
Elul Park
Gosforth l9s 9d
Killingworth l9s 6d
Dien Main 2os 6d
Ships at market

VICE-CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY.)
(Before the VICE. C HANCELLOR of ENGLAND.)
.„
PURSER AND OTHERS V. BRAIN AND OTHERS.-- TOO
LONDON MANURE COMPANY V. THE LONDON PATENT
MANURE COMPANY.
Mr. BUTE applied this morning, at the sitting of the
Court, upon notice, for a special injunction to restrain
the defendant from using in his printed circulars the
title of " The London Patent Manure Company."
It appeared from the statements of the Learned
Counsel that the plaintiffs, who wore extensively en'
gaged in the guano trade, had established a company;
which they called " The London Manure Company.,n
The defendants, who were also dealers in manure, Ila
set up a rival company, which they called " The London
Patent Manure Company." It had been ascertaine by
the plaintiff that the defendant had taken outd - no
patent whatever, and as the use of their title on his
circular by the defendant was calculated to injure the
plaintiff, the present application was made for the inter-
ference of the court.
The VICE. CHANCELLOR immediately granted the in:
junction, observing that it appeared to him a gross fraua
on the face of it that the defendant should use in the wit/
he had done the title of the plaintiff.

QUEEN'S BENCH.—(THIS DAY-)
(Sittings in Banco, before the LORD CHIEF JUSTICE and
Mr. Justice WIGHTMAN.) for the pur-
The Court sat today at twelve o'clock,
pose of giving judgment in several cases.
CANNING V. INCE.
This was an action upon an agreement,
which thew
fendant contended was forced from her mobile she
confined in a lunatic asylum, and consequently was 13°C
made with her own free will and consent, and ought'
therefore, to be annulled. The Court, however,took *
different view of the case, and discharged the rule.
THE CHURCHWARDENS OF ST. NICHOLAS, DEPTFORD, U.

SKETCHLEY.
In this case the plaintiff had become possessed of ce"
tain property in the parish of Deptford, which the de'
fendant claimed to be vested in him as trustee. The
property was left many years ago, for the benefit of the
poor of the parish, and the charity was vested in trustees,
In the course of time, however, the trustees died off, and
the parish officers undertook the conduct and adminis'
tration of the charity, but the defendant subsequendl
claimed and obtained possession of the charity as the
legal representative of the former trustees, and ben'
the present action, to try the right of the parties.
The COURT gave judgment for the defendant.
BARKER V. LEMON.
This was an action on a bill of exchange, to ivbiheh„,
the defendant had pleaded that the plaintiff was not 1""
holder of the bill, and to this plea the plaintiff had ue#
murred.
The COURT now gave judgment for the plaintiff.
7ILLITER V. PHIPPARS. ac
tiOn
This was a motion in arrest of judgment. -.;-prtain
~
was originally brought to recover the value el ---
property of the plaintiff', which had been destroyed de
a fire which broke out upon the premises of the
fendant.—Judgment for the plaintiff.

ROBINS V. FENNELL. Dyer
This was a rule to compel the defendant to psY
to the plaintiff a sum of money which he had rece,4o
in an action wherein Robins was also tha plaintiff
defendant was the London agent of Robins's attorney
and had applied the money to liquidating a debt whic
this attorney owed him.—Judgment for the defendant"
NEW TRIAL PAPER.
rising
of
The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE intimated at the
the Court that, as the special paper had taken UP xv
much time this term, all the special paper days for ne
term would be devoted to the new trial paper.

LONDON SESSIONS.-(THIS DAY*)
(Before the RECORDER, Aldermen Sir J. DUKE, GinWl'
and HITCHES.)
Jane Bryant was indicted for an assault on Nickels:
Henry, a clerk in the employment of Messrs. 13ering
Brothers. tbst
From the statement of the prosecutor it appeared
last Wednesday, he was in the counting-house writing
near the window, he heard a smash of glass, and innh ne'
diately afterwards was struck on the shoulder wit •
large brick thrown by the prisoner, who was standing
outside.
It appeared that the prisoner had been convicted
within the last month of a similar offence.
The prisoner said that her father was an engineer at
Maidstone, and that she had left her home in cense'
(pence of disagreements between herself and her step'
mother; she was in a state of utter destitution at the
time she committed the offence.
Alderman HUGHES observed that this was the effect
of the heartless administration of the poor-law.

The prisoner pleaded guilty.
The RECORDER, in passing sentence, expressed a We
that the case would be noticed by those charitable
dies who attend to such cases, but at the same time he
felt bound to pass a severe sentence to prevent the re
currence of such acts as the prisoner had coniraitte
The sentence was three months' imprisonment.

POLAND INCORPORATED WITH RUSSIA.--"A COI.
spondent writes from Magdeburg on the Ist, that 003
entire incorporation of the kingdom of Poland with II!:
Russian empire is decided upon, and will positiTely
pigee on January 1, 1848.

rra-