The Sun.
London, England, 1847-03-17 00:00:00

l‘irol SPOONER said he would bow to the wigh of the
.

en to brine in the l 3 il•
FACTORY BILL.
Mr. DENNISTOUN wished to ask a question of cell'
slOe'rable impel Nance with respect to factory ittbotir.
The SPEAKER—Tire lion. Member is out of order.
Mr. DENNISTOU.N e cud throw Himself on the in-
dulgence of the House.—(Hear.)
The SPEAKER said, as is appeared to be the wisll
of the House, the Hon. Member might proceed.
Mr. DENNISTOUN—The House was aware that tbo
Factory Bill was to come before the llcuse egai°'
to-morrow. The manufacturing interest had been over•
whelmed with surprise by the majority of the 110este 1,11
favour of the Bill,. and had not taken any steps w°a":
ever. He had received communications from w;
of the most influential of his constituent, wit,h;„,
proposal that would• meet the views of all 1)1,"'",„".
He regretted to see that the Hon. Member for 01U,c'a—
(Mr. Fielden) was not in his place, but as the lon'
Member for Cockermouth was present, and his celne
was at the back of the Bill, perhaps he could say wbei
ther the mover would be ready with the concurrence
the Noble Lord, to postpone the measure.
Lord J. RUSSELL said it was quite true that he
fan
Hon. Member had submitted the proposal ofa lb
which be conceived was likely to meet the views c'fi.ukeelf
the parties who were interested in this matter,
Bill ?J and h-eh
. !
to remove those portions of the Ten Hours'
were objectionable in their eyes. In his own °PTen
is
he must say that the proposal was feasible, uu'ber
Bill or
depended entirely on the feelings of the Hon.
for Oldham as to whether he would postpone the
Lord
not, t-speeially in its present stage. Nor could he P.
John Russell) ask him to do so. But it certainly %h
peered a great advantage to adopt any plan
"11
might meet the views of both parties.
Mr. AGLIONBY had no authority wh3teveri for
aceceling to a proposal fer postpunement, but be persi°
concurred in the opinion that it was most desirab,e
obviate the objections which had been entertellateed
against the measure The Noble Lord had enters
that it was necessary for the Hon. Member for Olcula.„
to state what ceurse. he intended to pursue, before
answer could be nto the question.' From carat e b:a
si.
fellen from the Noble Lora, it appeared that the POP
tion was worthy of attention. the
Mr. HUME eaid that as the first Minister 0-
Crown had expressly declared that this proposal /10
parties,
calculated to meet the objections of bothit vl
or
of immense importance that it should be d°l
sidered.
Mr. lIINDLEY hoped the House would go °- ;we*
the Bill. The difficulty of a private Member eacrYll)st
Bill through that House was.very great, and he
it unreasonable to expect the Hon. Member for 010,4
to postpone it. With regard to the opposition dilate,
masters, he believed it had very much abated of;:hes
and he believed that, if the Noble Lord stated his 'I, she
to tin in, there would be a general acquiescence 0'
part of both. oars°
Mr. P. BORTHWICK thought the proposed c-if be
was irregular, arid he trusted the lion. Gentleniall.,,'" to
wished for postponement, would be able to-10r'.
convince the Hoe of its proprie A ‘lOO
Dr. BOWIIING thought his Hon. Friend bad iced
everything that could be expected of him. He ""`"-„-$ to
a communication from his constituents with resP":„tioa
the Bill, and he no sooner received that cornmutc-fger
than he communicated it to the Government. 1"
he had done everything that could be expected fro°4 the
Mr. FERRAND said that the only method to e 0" for
discussion was to pass this Bill in the way it now st°'' old
if it was other, ise, a more determined agitation w°_,,a
take piece in far ur of the measure than heretoiore''rbe
the reason was, that the operatives had seen that el.
Anti-Corn-law League had carried their point by
tatioth

k)

en
I,tottlitlogrnttsthilte-bee‘i
their
IRISH EMIGRANTS. if the
Lord GEORGE BENTINCK desired to kaavi
eten A or 0 at
Government had received information of any I Tiaite-, r;_, aat
on the part of ,Itho Government of the head ;igiat to d;
States or New York to impose a duty of sl,peccd to
up, n immigrants to that country. He also ee5.14.1 the dello '`..hl
it, elm
know what were those other documents to whit thel
akler,7
Noble Lord referred upon a previous occasion when
were diseussing the subject of Cracow. 0 statiees
Lord PALMERSTON said that, with referenceoil toeot
the first question, he did not understand that had the co
been ntionedided su p hadin been Congress, but taken. Theno subkint Faistialo that
t
me!.
had beim conveyed to him respecting "' es-
,vs
answer to the second part of the Noble Lor" than lith;
tion, he would say that his eve was quickersolio
to,
his ear, for he (Lord Palmerston) only , there se,
and the interpretation of that smile was not that is
were other documents, but that the Noble Lora "° the
find, by reference to the library of the House, th3:,,,;r0 t'
British Government, at the Congress of Vien"'„ress•
party to all protocols and treaties made at that ull ,by
ADJOURNED
CRACOW. se 011
DEBATE.—ANNEXATIONOn the order of the day for the adjourned deb 2.
Cracow being read, ug th.
Sir JOHN WALSH rose and said in addressiito
House he would apply himself first to the Paletiw
of the question arising out of the motion of tuerseti*
Member for Montrose, and inquire what was the first
cal and immediate question before the House. ~
_bir
bad
question for them to consider would be whether
any legal right to free themselves from theouizassie is tioa
a-•;
of that treaty to continue the payment faith °`
whether it would be consistent with t" con-
treaties, or with their own character' to
t inue that payment. The second question ise,
whether, the other being assumed, it would be %%re,
whether it would be politic, whether it would be e-
sistent with their national status in the p„r
sent condition of Europe, to pursue such a cot.:
When he entered upon this question, he "
say that he felt considerable dissatisfaction
the mode in which the Honourable Diet
for Montrose had introduced his motion, not that
had stated what was not literally true, but any Pe'
who
owas
not
acquainted
erroneouswith conclusion.t h e
whole
Tie
question,ico7
be led into a very
Lion of the 19th of November, 1831;, was merely, a st
mental measure, to supply a Parliamentary deficieLF
was contended that, in equity, England could not avat
of the treaty of Vienna. It was, however, subsequen
witted that Parliamentary sanction was requisite:,
treaty bore date May, 1815, and the treaty of I
merely a subsequent and technical
,treaty, calculate'
effect to the former one. What was that tre4
1815, and what were the obligations by whiellmit
bound under that treaty ? The treaty to whic" ;,
1815 referred was one between Holland and Russ"
the treaty of 1831, England rendered herself ref
the obligations into which Holland had entered
In order to show what the nature of that treaty vo
Baronet read the preamble of the treaty of 1815,
appeared that, in consideration of the assistance
the allied powers to Holland, Jain agreed to pa!
for the expenses which had been incurred. It w
dent that this sum was to be paid for the res'
kingdom of Holland. At the conch
speech on Thursday last, the Righ
Baronet the Member for Tamworth had ta'
remind the House of the services which Eng]:
to Europe during the great struggle of the I:
of the obligations which s he had undertaken
—when she took up—the responsibilities of t
Holland and Russia. He rejoiced to hea
from the lips of the Right Hon. Gentlema
England should be reminded that she was
in making those arrangements, and he tho
was due to Russia, as she was the first tha
Napoleon, and helped to effect the deliver:
Right Hon. Gentleman the Member fur
tested against a doctrine in one of Monsie
that the breach of one article of a treat
tion of the treaty itself on all who were
not think that Mons. Guizot was core
though he was not sorry to see the pre
Gentleman, he thought that he had p'
the phrase than the writer of it inter),
know, however, how they should a(
adopting the resolutions of the Hon
If they acted in this manner, they w(
ciple that the infraction by Russia of
would justify them in releasing the
gations which they owed to Russia,
The Member for Montrose had m
judicial character, and he had calle
whether, under certain consideratit
obliga, ions otherwise binding. T
tion to be in, namely, to be judE
was, therefore, doubly necessary
bearings of the case, and to see
attaching weight to the allegati,
how far matter had been urged i
He said the Right Hon. Baron
had expresed a strong opisior
England;—of all the great P
of protection to the smaller at
thing to the effect that they
anxiety as to such a Power
Bavaria, Prussia ; but he di
of the body of internationa
weaker States, He (Sir J
the Right Hon. Baronet, f
of the great States, and tt
' special interest of Englan(
to gain from territorial a
and if she absorbed any
a sacrifice, and the loss w
entertained that opinion
British empire would b,
that, among those sma
duty, that if they had
bound to observe strict
casion for aggression f
the smaller States oil
secure them peace, wl
pose they should tak
portance of the noble
nent of commercial
merchants, the pro
vital spirit of comm
nence to that tow
France were sudd
possession, and
that she was to se
Frankfort. If
burst of indignat
pose, that instea,
that she was obl
come a politica
to become wha
century. Thr
enemies of Fr
to state that a
Inn tandis, he
thetical case
In making t
House to th
sympathy o'
this insurre
movement
Poles who
stepped fi
ready to
so much
11.,!ssta—
that ma
These v
rection
known
or int
but tt
from

------".
wish of the

szinn of c':ll'

12,1),nr.
)lit orayr.
If on cno in-

be the wish
:ecd.
;lite that the
tl bi en over:
he House in
r steps what'
from snore
ql:s, wit"!
all Parties.
for Oldhaai
as the 11°1/'
vi his DO'
ald say whe:r
ncurreace

true that the
tl s Plao
dews of both
and Which
Billwh!ciinjofi,
own
iible 1
mhemat ber
[on. or
the d
old he L°
ertainiy
inn " hie°

hatever for
he perfeatif
' desirable to he
entertains
had stated
for Oldham
e, before el
a; what bi,
the Pr°P°s

lister f the
sal fall
;tropo
rties, it 1:
duty CO.

w
00 °n with
rrvog
he th°u"
for
Oldbs°
he
ition 0f
t
tea of late,
:id his witele
cence 00

)osed c°;tierre
go
0_1:nom,"

d had `l`,:ed
He refit
reePec.
• ntri nl‘ Io .
fact,
,d from
bitocd t'°`
d to e A for
)1' 5t00,..01
ration ,'
pfd
yood
-etcoort'' the
een flit&
)int bi lig

if the
know ti(' 0
iv in
tesa • ti
• Vlte
;he vs,.
51. per d to
;0 desir,,
) *vint
a when t;

° "
7,feWIC Any
that hsci
übjec, 4,tiott
into"- 10
it, ,
frds goes!,
91:‘, • -.tier tbad
31Y sitter°
that
Lord ".°,b°
t
3e9hat e
• r
a s"°
ienn
t

a dew' °°

iressieg thg
tieelar°
par tion„
f the
.0 nr.-
t" r first
The Logi
,3r their •
obliga.ti°
Russia%
, faith or
to c°n-
3tion wage'
ild be will,
ild be co
oe'
the t ?
coorsest
he Must
faction _
bleln"r
e
of that b:
any perse
ion, would
io convey
ly a suppirs
iciei.cy, if
avail
pv003'141:0
ite.
1831 'if
ited to g
thee,p oe
v,
y,
g land WS'
e treaty of
and, by
pt: nsible for
pith Russis•
the 11°1i
wibie;by
renaere..
.rtain Or:
oly
aiti f the
two ° bis
3 °f
_340
00,0100-to
occalifered
id rend
r; ae" vied
he :estl'w eell
be t
`tY
ntioleeti
heegh-ct
onlY 9g-de
e gestitlier
ie P e vibe
,roPe•
slset„rbes
defrP3'7
the
t. 1 j
stood,aoo,
ight
ituele."rto
uld it
of tbe
trop
, the
tre c-tif.
these;lP
r gsunie s
to de,ciotio:
aged
ir.
cate rd" it
!
ttn-tile
e"
ooned j 0
made' rigid.
.11 ace-tli,
)ower 10'r
rnessive.,
gas 9° 0o
• bale
or
ssia'• tule
prioc d
Ithe
to
with
be lid
Itbe
y net bin%
so;
gleat st
lo
.t the
vbilee
tbe
ter °f
id of
roil/aye°
rere -
batan! ,t
ssY
is °°
nut 0„-,0
the i,„°-
lost ;
,st fer be
tb°
eta, ,
301 etsi,
ble
tb
nritori
al
r city
e city
bt be
°°r
imierv-1
to be'
fort
of t
Olt
,nce the
France
mutat°
le bYcoP.'
;ralt•
n of tile
d to the
30. *l,
Fir trP.
,e great
to, lib!
re ever
v""'"f
Aver
and SP
[MOUT
boar'
we.,11.,'
iirecuy
ection;
erianla
Lopat'"'

from Mr. Magen nig, that General Sobieski, who was so dis-
t:ue'tishrd for his gallantry in the contest of IFt3O, had
wo2uti,et ab,tahle‘i trom
of Craea,,. and had, as 30 ,L Lf.l ;; Ma ion
of the outbreak, not only refased the sanmitn of Lis r;at
but had removed into the territories of is as soon
;,1 it commenced. The Hon. Meint.er for Fii.sbury charged
his lion. Friend t Lord George Bentiock ) with only partially
!Whig the manifesto of the provis.mial Government of Poland
~.1411ed at the breaking out of the revolution. If the Hi-use
"u,uld permit him, he would read the document in full, which
Welt be called the Magna Charta of Poland. (Hear ) (The
st• Member here read the various articles of the manifesto. )
The penalty of death was also to be enhereed upon spies, and all
declared forming clubs against the new Government were to be
"dared traitors to the country. Any interference with the
siptuala established was also to be punished with death. The
wth article regulated the national colours very minutely, and it
.1,14: that system of contemptible trifling and sanguinary tyranny
rch was to guide the future destinies of Poland. The ccin
rof Cracow must be deemed a 3 involvin,2; its own safety.
could not conceive that when a small state like Cracow was
- tlieuPied by a military force that it could be other than imbe-
,..! and weak, or that it subjected itself willingly to -ugh Judi-
"4l occupation. M. Guizot had very much urged upon the
consideration of the three Powers the pos-ibility of their adopt-
ithot3t destroying the independence of Cracow, such pre-
alve measures as would check the progress of these conti-
nued insurrections. Such a course could not be adopted without
4,
interest
vast and general system of espionage, which, even to the
s, erest of Cracow itself, would be most objectionable. Cracow
k,uld have been placed in a false position, and instead of being
rnefitted by such an arrangement it would have been ma-
'Molly injured. Was the state of Europe such as would war
'lnt them in directing to the three Powers such a feeble show
remonstrance and hostility, which would not have the
tallest effect upon the independence of Cracow So great a
t7O"
611 as England could never have recourse to a little war, or
v,,Petty and inefficient measure. Let the House consider
116":‘ Would be the effect of a measure of petty hostility—as
?,,;,__cted to these three Powers—it would lead to innumerable
sourll, and declarations on the part of Russia, that this
iv„id Y had been guilty of a gross breach of faith, while it
be productive of no effect, but that of contempt. He
r aware that warm feelings existed in this country towards
Zees but he knew, from his own experience, that the same
ett:sßa did not exist in France. France was, he believed, at
tuctnent the only nation of Europe which had a desire
~Zart and a desire of aggrandisement by conquest. The
spj'lng bered namin
thates of Macountrengory,, Auster
and likept tz, analived Jenathat warlike
are still re-
ipir,
tool* He hoped that the powers of Europe would be
tie to arrange the present difficulty without
th"eg that fearful feeling. He felt convinced that in
p event of any disturbance of the peace of Europe
bLsOce would not be a safe ally for this country. How many
ti"Z during the last seven years had they been on the verge of
ouleah of their treaty with this country? It was only the
tetb..tnight that they were called upon to increase the navy
tourtes. because they were assured that the whole seaward
Do of France was arming. He did nit know for what pur-
IC the 127 furnaces were burning at Brest, but of this he
kliaured, that they did not burn there. to restore the inde-
itofMatonens of Cracow. Under these circumstances, he
.felt
teloo-trY willing to vote with the Noble Lord on the previous
epee °122 and be did not feel inclined to interfere with the
with respect to Cracow by any such inefficient
71.h.re.
14;7 HARRY VANE had not heard an argument to induce
tite' agree with the object of the present motion. He had
Ilklsed with the utmost attention to the statements of the Hon.
o Irjoinita
ct (Sir J. Walsh) to a certain extent he agreed
teehriu, 't that the treaty of 1831 was a subsequent and a
To
teal treaty ; but still he could not separate that tree. y from
treaty of 1815, and from that of the 14th of August, 1814.
tees certain extent he coincided with the Right Hon. Baronet,
sit i ielnber for Tamworth (Sir R. Peel) that there had been
41114'404in of those treaties ; but yet, at the same time he
of th acceded to the proposition of the Noble Lord at the bead
Government, that it was unbecoming in this country to
tioi`wd to the monetary consideration of a great political clues-
, IN' and that it was salleient that a protest had been entered
ttotenst the proceedings of the three Powers. Yet he, at the same
the. must say that the three Powers saw reason to believe that
deolisc.lePendenee of Cracow occasioned disturbances in their
of tintucs that they might not do away with the sixth article
Una e treaty of Vienna. But although he was far from saying
%%the independence of Cracow was of the great importance
Itetuae Peace of Europe which it had been represented to be, he
tigh" at the same time assert that the three Powers had no
tto destroy the independence of Cracow w ith:ot onsult-
%%their allies. After going through the several p lit :cal rela-
deli,lawhich had arisen out of the treaty of Vienna, but while
e,,-4'ng which it was utterly impossible to give this details
opoiT'lacquence of the peculiar tone in which the Noble Lord
sttn e, he proceeded to say that, reviewing all these circum-
to,,tea, there appeared to be ample reason for the acknowledg-
h%he'd that Russia and Austria had no right to act without
i concurrence of France and England. He would not
tbititeY upon the alliance of France, although he felt
p'"e, Right Hon. Baronet the Member for Tamworth ( Sir
ee'), bad hardly done justice to the worth of that alliance.
v.quite agreed with M. Guizot, that it was ne justification
e tever for one party to kite sight of his engagements, be-
eet!arvele another had altogether overlooked them. He bad stated
heY shortly what his opinions were, but he could not
re at all with the opinion expressed by the Right Hon.
ti7enet the other night, that there was no sufficient justitica-
"it for the protest, and he sincerely trusted that the three
peat Powers would take warning from the observations of the
4se on the coarse which they were pursuing, and that this
Zehtry might take advantage of the legal construction of this
"tety,
the Itlr. J. WORTLEY felt himself in a great dilemma as to
question which was before the House. He would express
as plainly and as forcibly as he was able, his total disapprobation
If the suppression of the independence of Cracow.
But he could not forget that there were political
considerations well worthy of attention, and which induced
ra to hope that the Honourable Member for Montrose
°Old not force the House to a decision on the question.
tie did not wish to dwell upon topics which tended to create a
'Pith of hostility in that House, but he could not help re-
kitking that, on the first partition of Poland in 1772, the
Y 4140,_? excuses were put forward by Catherine that had been
ad arced by the existing Sovereign of the same country.
ikt:leminded the House that in the year 1814 it was one of
47„orst articles of the convention of Paris that the throne of
1161,11 d should be restored to the house of Orange, and Great
to voluntarily gave up the colonies which had belonged
tig-Cticeuntry (and particularly Java), which they had every
if fat
tthelle laws of conquest to retain ; and therefore, in point
frierua. restoration of these colonies depended only on the
treat of the King for the house of Orange. By the
Yof Paris it was determined that Great Britain should
title )000/. to Sweden, 2,000,0001. for the re-construc-
ted t"' the fortifications of Holland on the side of France,
eke: Rive' an equal amount, with Holland, to the other
tkiti; such sum not to exceed 3,000,0001. Among the subjects
Veen„eame under the consideration of the convention of
`thstio' Was the consideration of the losses sustained by
af her the destruction of her ancient capital—the ravaging
country in a greater degree than suffered by her allies
title toit was agreed upon that England should waive her
el t°
of the
in favour of Russia! And why ? Bee
icicle the facility which the latter country had given to the
Stooentets..,t ef Holland. But they did not undertake to pay an
"alogiti "i money to Russia as security for Holland. Their
iro. On to pay was a distinct and independent one. The
to 41`"eneber then read the stipulations of the treaty of 1831,
old 7 that cassia was guaranteed the repayment of her
ZiceHestch debt, on condition of her maintaining
Ie the treaty of Vienna.—( Cries of Hear, hear.)
Eierttatderation of the treaty of 1815. and subsequently of
4441114 the general arrangements of the Congress of Vienna,
eee Lfecilities Russia had afforded towards carrying them
the oti;lad that consideration failed ? had on one side,
Ofe.r, had a right to take advantage l
oft it. What was the
things in the time of Lord Castlereagh? Why Lord
'41101411 h, assisted by France, wished to restore the freedom
lteeeeu, while Russia wished to have the whole of Poland
'Zla? to Warsaw; and the contest was brought to an end by
`alt 4-* a contracting to secure the freedom of Cracow. Upon
oderstanding the loan under discussion was taken up by
and; but as Russia had broken one of the conditions of
esti, tieLto ercent, England clearly had a right to (lie-
f' a it, payment. But then, did not matters
-„cY suggest to them that it would be in-
!tk'lls, to pursue such a course ? England was in possession
too Hies, which were part of the consideration for which
of
ePon herself the loan, while in times of danger and
tlee o;,teevi gone by, Russia had observed—and with the excep-
l'e ty. instance, still observed the conditions of the
eetelt • Vienna. Was it prudent, then, for England now to
hietitneloall, in consequence of the confiscation of a geogra-
kttr, kagr°lll? Could she do it without coming to some new
gab Cement with Russia as to the possession of the colonies?
te„stierellended not, and therefore he was so far opposed to the
(Rill the Hon. Member for Montrose.— (Hear, hear. )
Arien'tluowever, there could be no doubt that the Treaty of
seLtited had been violated; for Russia reluctantly con-
to only to that part of the treaty which related
."3eseo-te freedom of Poland, but still she did
e`ce toe `e it, and there could not be a shadow of a doubt that
'eteife'eaation of this geographical atom to Austria was a
kid ti at violation of the treaty. In the Convention of Austria
tosdt °'and, the real contracting. parties in thin matter, Russia
btla<t proposals, upon which was ultimately founded the
th:estY which settled the balance of power to be exercised
No various nations of Europe. Now in those very pro-
le,.
et there was an article expressly providing for the freedom
11114 f'uceetlft the town and state of Cracow,
.and in the face of
It the Austria wasim 13n0sds.lprleust:iadehnayi violated
tzeantrde htyeotr
soirioetnhnear
ban, time
Parts they had taken with regard to Cracow.
'411,0 time that treaty was come to, it was admitted on all
athris that Cracow was of the utmost importance to England,
hveven now it was a commercial station of no mean character.
thought at that time that Cracow was a city of too
CO importance to be given to either party. It was quite
%! that a violation of the treaty had taken place. The
lidZliet of the annexing parties would also show that they con-
tra red it themselves that they were taking a coarse contrary
tetheee treaty of Vienna. They had acted in the matter alle-
le% t without the knowledge and consent of Eng-
acee'f`( Hear, hear.) This country would, he hoped, not de-
liZreto avenge the violation of the treaty by inflicting
,soiti Pecuniary punishment. He hoped that the House
4.ord.,d•pt the dignified course recommended by the Noble
eanm_et the head of Government, and set thereby an ex-
Rotr4to the other states of Europe and to the world. He
tiet.ptiliniutk,,rnfore,. if the motion were pressed to a division,
oetholvide with him upon the first resolution, but against
rient e last resolution, recommending a suspension of the
of the interest on the Russo-Dutch loan.
`4S '"RISTIE said that the real facts of the history of
byte evae
mautiPpeared to be, that a payment should be made
thet inter to Russia, of a sum of money equal in amount to
ettn. est en what has since been known as the Russo-Dutch
411106 The
tsh le •
portion of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman's
so,off
cacti might be deemed historic, had not, in his opi-
teat de or altered the position of the question, and with
edict teren„
a._ not think
to that Hon. Gentleman's legal acquirements,
ei,Zotil eou, that words introduced into the preamble of a_
to elation fifteen years after the date of the first, and
tlitlitte co_in a ver general and vague rnanner with respeet
or afjeotinu
fgTess of Vienna, could b considered as binding on
vieoo.g the general interests of the parties to the. treaty
R hear ) It h b said, that even if a
b th
e 1)4 eear treaty had takenad place,een this country would
et'• be
to fulfil the engagements which she had entered
tielt if -e
"54 not, however, agree in that opinion, he thought
to tea provisions of the treaty were violated, all the par••
,then"`!.tre7ety would be released from their engagements.
rein o„,i(ce infraction of the treaty had absolved Eegland
tzkia rte
et the, interest on the Russo- Dutch lean, England
sod olltr pay it, and it would not be shabby. for
e todeaeo Y to take advantage of that violation.
,tfivat pow_ttr to inflict some punishent, however small, upon
kite hem 'lifer the infliction ef am reat injury. le on the
thuSey, the'etnla country was not absolved from paying the
ehc conduct" "shabby" would not express in proper terms
tt conduct h of the country in withholding the same. He
nta.t
14 ever, that
ss it was inconsistent with the functions
Natio „11"se to pa resolutions on the subject of the foreign
441 C. oth
er countries. He thought that this debate
IC! of ir....,ennclude without some remark to the cruel-
IsTobi,sl,l and the barbarities of Gallicia, especially as
Zo!lt 11,;_tr)rd the Illember for Lynn had, in a most extrava-
itis`lv which was its own refutation, gone comiderably
it,ar the ay. to pass a high-flown eulogium on what he
Mild and paternal Governments of Austria and
")% h " Member then proceeded to read extracts
-4111. ber of letters written by Mr. Magennis and other