The Sun.
London, England, 1849-01-05 00:00:00

PROCLAMATION OF OUTLAWRY.

The following persons were called on to surrender
at the suit of their respective creditors, or to be out-
lawed :—Matthew B. Rennie, at the suit of William
Strachan and another ; John Robert Holmer, suit of
James Arding, the elder; Sir 'William Massey
Stanley, Bart., suit of William Jones ; Thomas Par-
ker, the younger, suit of Henry George Robinson ;
Edward Fennell, suit of Charles Cancellor; Fre-
derick Thomas Mullins, suit of Charles Addis and
another; William Ward, at the suit of John Carlow
and another ; William Hanham, at the suit of Ber-
nardo Goldshead ; William Gravener, suit of Joshua
Mayhew and another; T. L. Cross, suit of Va-
lentine Elkins ; Frederick E. March, suit of John
Brydie ; Joachim Hayward Stoqueler, suit of Henry
Levy ; Thomas Deserneaux, suit of William John
; James Lang, suit of Edward Lewis ; H. J.
Janney, at the suit of John Pook ; Charles Beau-
clerk, commonly called Lord Charles Beauclerk, at
the suit of George S. Harcourt ; Thomas Boulton,
suit of George Lees ; John P. I3eavan, at the suit of
William Cox; C. E. Synge, suit of Richard Kirkman
Lane ; and Lord Algernon Chichester, suit of Charles
Smith.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, Jan. 4.
(Before Mr. Commissioner EVANS.)
IN THE BANKRUPTCY OF WILLIAM PRICE.

This bankrupt formerly carried on business in
copartnership with Frederick Mangles and Henry
Talbot Moore, in New-Broad-street. They were East
India and general merchants. In 1845 the bankrupt
withdrew from the concern, having assigned over his
interest to the other two partners. He has lately
resided in the Strand. This was a meeting for the
last examination.

Mr. Lawrance supported, Mr. Sargood appeared for
the creditors.

The following are the main items of the joint
balance-sheet, which was obtained, notwithstanding
the interdict of his Honour : The balance-sheet
commences on the Ist of January, 184 k, and ends on
the 27th of September, 1848. Sundry creditors,
7,333/. ; profits, 7,932/. ; amount subsequently
brought into the firm by Mangles, 18,250/. ;
ditto, by Moore, 15,6761.; ditto, by the bankrupt,
8,0691.; amount advanced by Mangles and Co. ;
28,485/. ; cipital on the Ist of January, 1845,
15,1381.; and on the credit side, good debts, 881.;
doubtful ditto, 2,358/. ; bad ditto, 2,378/. ; property,
8,842/.; amount drawn out of the firm by Mangles,
1,2521. ; by Moore, 1,293/.; by the bankrupt, 1,8281.;
interest, 8,078/. ; office expenses, 756/. ; losses,
68,7661.

Amongst the "property" set down in the joint
balance-sheet are the following items :—the ship
Claudine of 480 tons, the cost of which was 5,232/. ;
estimated to realise 2,500/. Shares in the Union
Bank, which cost 223/., and now estimated to realise
about the same amount. 100 acres of land in Aus-
tralia, which cost 114/. The separate balance-sheet
of the bankrupt has "Sundry creditors, 509/. Capi-
tal, 2,594/. Amount of dividend of profits, received
on shares in the Australian and Colonial Assurance
Company, 221. 10s. Amount of gifts from relations,
2,917/. Amount of annuity under marriage settle-
ment, 170/. Doubtful debts, 35/. Property, 130/. ;
ditto in the hands of Mangles and Co., 120/. Ex •
penses, 1,496/. Losses, 1,993/. Amount paid into
the firm of Mangles and. Moore, 3,0694 Amount
paid for losses and averages, 1,1981."
A claim was made by Mr. Sargood, on behalf of
Messrs. Mangles and Moore, the bankrupt's former
partners, for 21,0001. It appeared that the whole
partnership trading up to June, 1845, at which period
Price went out, has, through the depreciation of the
produce in which they dealt and bad debts, resulted in
a loss of 68,000/. The partners, Messrs. Mangles
and Moore sought to prove against the estimate for
the bankrupt's proportion of that loss.
Mr. LAWRANCI resisted the admission of the proof,
on the ground that it did not appear all the partner-
ship debts had been discharged, and, therefore, the
partners could not prove in competition with the other
creditors.

Mr. SARGOOD said, that up to this time, no assignee
had been chosen, and no debt had been proved, and,
therefore, the case was not yet ripe for discussion.
The bankrupt had failed to debit himself in his
balance sheet with the sum claimed by the other
partners, or any part of it.
Finally the proof was ordered to stand over. One
debt of 1801. was proved, and Mr. Lattraile, clerk to
Messrs. Mangles and Moore, was appointed assignee.