The Sun.
London, England, 1841-06-24 00:00:00

AUDITORS.

Professor Wheat stone, F, tt. S. Professor Graves, A.M. P.R. S.
ACT!! A KY-NV', ;t3. B. Woolhonse, Esq., F. R. A. S
Some= as—Mt:nes. Sweet, Sutton, Ewens, and Omman-

ney, 6, Basingliall-slreet.
LIFE ASSURANCE.
_

Besides the perfect security to the policy holder of a large
paid up capital, and accumulating funds, the following is one
amongst mans of the advantages which belong exclusively to
the principles of Life Assurance and Deferred Annuities ori-
ginated by th. Society, viz.—Power to borrow (without de-
lay, expense, or forfeiture) Two-thirds of all premiums paid
upon a Policy of Assurance.
The annexed is a short Table, showing the Annual Premium
for assuring £loo on the Whole Lite, or for a Term

FOR LIFE.
A. B.
Age. Without With For One For Five
Profits. Profits. Year only. Years only
X. s. d. X. s. d. X. s. d. X. s. d.
20 1 13 7 1 17 4 017 0 017 6
30244293 0 19 6 1 0 0
40 21881 3 5 3 1 13 10 15 0
50 4 4 2 4 13 6 1 13 0 1 16. 6
606131178 4 3 0 0 3 9 6
Two-thirds of Profits divided annually amon!st the Assured.

Two-
-1

hirds of Profits divided annually amongst the Assured.
>EFERRED ANNUITIES DEPARTMENT.

By the plan exclusively developed by this Society, a single
Deferred Annuity is made, nGt only to answer the same object,
but to far exceed in amount the entire benefit of all the ad-
♦antages heretofore only obtained by the middle and industrious
classes through separate investments in Savings' Banks, Be-
nefit Societies, and Loan Banks.

1. A small yearly or weekly contribution will secure the
most ample icturn for after life; thus--21. 12a. per annum (Is.
a week) at the age of 20, will give the policy holder the fol-
lowing option, at the age of 65
Annuity for remainder of life £47 16 6
Cash

Policy, without further contributions, of 466 0 oat death.
Other periods of life (of 50, 55, and 60) may be also taken
with similar advantages.
2. Two-thirds at any time lent on deposit of policy, being a
land always available during sickness or want of employment.
3. Two-thirds of all payments returned to representatives in
case of premature death.
N. B. Policies, as collateral money-security, for periods of
one to five years, effected at lower rates than are charged by
any other Office, (ice Tables A. and B.), with option of coa-
tinuame for Life at the usual rates.
F, fERGUSON COI4OIIX, See,

Just published, price 2s. tid.
APRACTICAL ESSAY on the DEBILI-
TIES of the GENERATIVE SYSTEM, their Va-
rieties, Causes, Treatment, and Cure.

Bya\lE BEit of the ROVAL COLLEGE Q; ;URGEONS,
London, and Surgeon to a Metro
" I am impotent, and no', fit ti ;ir
ire..,__Laseg I,
iteuvrds of
Suicide. -cotan Infirmary.
.ti

Sold by Ottnh-.0. Cuthertne-fit, strand; Ross and
Nightingale, t Olitalf, Birmingham ; and all Book-
sellers in ,„,,,,,titioltrr,
Pees Yft the Country may have this work forwarded
rp pest (If're.t ), upon addressing either of the above Buoktullers,
tottii'tmtiising a remittance of

Just published, in loyal Duna cloth, price 34.; and sent ttee
on receipt of a.Poistwoffl ).
ec Order, ter ata
jANHOODt the CAtJES of its PRE-
MATURE DrCtittlt; With Plain Directions for
ITS PERFECT TIESIVI:A.TION; addressed to those suf-
fering fr,un the itottllctive effects of Excessive Indulgence,
Solitary Habits, Dr Infection ; followed by Observations en the
TREATMENT of SYPHILIS, GONORRHOSA, GLEET,
.Illustrated with Cases, iko.
By J. L. CURTIS and COMPANY,
Consulting Stitrotts, London.
Published by the Authors, and sold by RMlttte, Medical
Bookseller to tho Roykl Collee„e f Sititt6ns, 219, Regent-
street ; 011ivier, 59, Pall Maii; Szange, 21, Paternoster-
row ; Pattie, 4, Brytiker-btrat, Strand; 8, D'Olier-street,
Dublin; Duecair, nigh-street, Edinbrrgh; and tvi Ike ttttl
of all BookselletN,

The Work which is now presented to the ptiblit it tlit result
of very extended experience in a class el ista.aYtYt al tree-
bons, which far some unaccountable tett'on hide been Caller
altogether overlooked, or treated with epohy, and almost in-
Cierence, by the °Wintry pit ttitloner. To enter into the
details of these altectietts, to point out their causes, and to
mark the Ceti% eonsequences, social, moral, and physical,
vvhich ace sure to follow from indulgence, in certain habits,
wrould be entirely out of place in an advertisement. We hive
no hesitation, however, in saying that there it no member of
society, by whom the book will nut be found interesting, whe-
ther we consider such person to hold the relation of a PA.
RENT. a PRECEPTOR. or a CLERGYMAN,.
Messrs. CURTIS and CO. are to be consulted daily at their
residence, No. 7, Frith-street, Solve, front Ten till Three, and
Five till Eight in the Evening; and Country Patients are re-
quested to be as minnte es possible in the detail of their cases,
—as to the duration of the complaint, the symptoms, age, ge-
neral habits of living, and occupation in life of the Tarty t the
communiettion must be accompanied by the " usual Consulta-
tion Fee of 11.," without which nn notice whatever can be
taken of their applications erirt i ll cases, the most inviolable
secrecy may be r!littd Oh.

Tlin IDLER IN F.RANCE.---As Lady Blessing..
ton, during her residence in Paris, moved in the most
brilliant. society in the French metropolis, her "Idler
in France," as may readily be imagined, is remarkably
rich in piquant anecdote. Exclusive of the large num-
ber of distinguished foreigners who have a place in these
voluthes, her Ladyship introduces the reader to an as-
semblage equally brilliant of her own compatriots, amon.,
others the Dukes of Wellington and Hamilton ; the
Ladies Hawarden, Combermere, Stuart de Rothesay,
Lyndsay, and Dysart; Lords Byron, Yarmouth, Lilford.
Lansdowne, Darnley, Charlemont, Stuart de Rothsay,
Erskine, Glenelg, Rosslyn, John Russell, Allen, Pem-
broke, Palmerston, Castlereagh, Cadogan, and Abinger ;
Sirs Robert Peel, FranciS Burdett, Andrew Barnard,
William Drummond, William Gell ; Colonels E. Lygon,
Leicester Stanhope, and Caradoc ; and Messrs. Charles
Mills, Douglas Kinnaird, Standish; Cuthber
'Walter Savage Landor, Shelley, William Spencer, Rogers,
Luttrell, &c., &c.

EAST INDIA HOUSE.

The Quarterly General Meeting of the East India
Company was held yesterday at the India House, jn
Leadenhall-street. The chair was taken by G. Lyall,
Esq., at twelve o'clock.
The,CLl:ni,: read the minutes of the last`Court..

_
The CHAIRMAN read the itePort of the deputation ap-
pointed to present the address to the Queen on the birth
of Princess Royal,
The CLERK read the correspondence which had taken
place with reference to the statue to be erected to the
Marquis of Wellesley, in,the Company's Court, and a
list of the returns from the'Rouse of Lords and the

House of Commons on the subject of the connexion which
exists between the British .Government in India and the
religious ceremonies of the natives.
The CHAIRMAN presented a list of the superannuations
granted since the last General Court.
The Report of the Committee on Bye-laws was then
read, stating that they been duly observed, and the
Committee were re-appointed to act for the ensuing year.
Mr. MARRIOTT presented to the Court a petition
against the encouragement given to idolatry in India.
The Hon. Proprietor stated that the petition was an
exact copy of that which was presented by Lord Ashley
in the House of Commons, and by the Bishop of London
in the House of Lords. _

Mr. MONTGOMERY MARTIN withdrew his notice of
motion respecting the Land Revenue of India, and gave
notice of it for next Court day;
On the motion of Mr. 1). SALomoNs, the corre-
spondence between the Court of Directors and Captain
Charitty, relative to the refusal of compensation to the
latter, was.ordered to be laid on the table.

CASE OF THE•RAJAII OF SATTARA.
Mr. D. SALOMONS said, before bringing on the im-
portant motion which stood next in order, he must ex-
press his regret thatthe subject of it was not taken up,
by one who had more influence in the Court, and who
was more acquainted with the
.politics of India, but the
papers relating to the case having been laid on the table
of the House, on his motion, and as he thought it neces-
sary that the Proprietors should express their opinion
on the question before it was taken up by the House of
Commons, which it soon would be, he had thought it his
duty to bring it under discussion, and he was then pre-
pared to state his opinion from the voluminous papers
which had been put into the hands of Hon. Members.
But they need not feel alarmed, for it was
not his intention to lengthen his speech in
proportitm to the voluminousness of the Papers. They
were all aware that the India Government had set up
the Rajah of Sattara, and bound him by a treaty, but
the English were surely as much bound by it as he
was. It was not to be entirely a one-sided one. It ap-
peared that some questions had arisen with respect to
the violation of this treaty. The Court of Directors
had on that, as on every other occasion, acted with
the strictest justice, and he (Mr. Salomons) must say,
that if any evidence were required as to the desire of
the Directors to study the interest, of the natives of
India,. it appeared on the face of that document.
Any person who read the treaty could not for a moment
doubt the impolicy of the Government of Bombay.
The Court of Directors did not break the treaty.
He (Mr. Salomons) did not say who broke it ; but there
was much ground for the belief that the English autho-
rities had broken the treaty. The Rajah, to whom he
had occasion frequently to allude, had expressed his in-
tention of sending, some persons to this country to
enable him to obtain justice, and shortly after that pro-
jected embassy an alleged conspiracy was brought under
the attention of the authorities. The conspiracy was of
a very undefined nature, and was -said ft involve an at •
tempt to meddle with the officers of a native regiment,
and draw them off from their allegiance. When the
matter was investigated it appeared of so ridiculous a
nature and so completely without an object that it was
impossible to found any proceedings upon it. He (Mr.
Salomons) had read the evidence of the Rajah himself,
and he felt himself bound to say that he never met evi-
dence which seemed more full of truth. Mr. Salo-
mons then read to the Court the minutes of
Mr. Henry Shakspeare on this subject, wherein that
gentleman stated that he could not agree with the
Bombay Government, that it was expedient to adopt a
middle course, in this instance, if the Rajah were guilty;
that he was not satisfied with the evidence adduced, and
that he would, therefore, acquit him altogether rather
than adopt half measures of punishment, even if he (the
Rajah were guilty. Mr. Salomons then went on to eay
that, when the evidence was read coolly and dispas-
sionately, it would be seen that there was no foundation
whatever for the charge against the,Rajali.. But the Go-
vernment of Bombay had made up their minds that the
Rajah was guilty, and that if the evidence was not suf-
ficient to convict him of treason, it was sufficient to
show that he was an individual capable of com-
mitting it. When the sttlAiect was brought again
before the Governor,General, he again begged the with°.
rides at BontaAiyi,,+-s
would fai: before them the
whole-Case,. and put them in entire possession of the
facts. They were two letters from the Chief Secretary
of the overnor:4eneral of to.lia to the Chief Secretary
of the governor of Bombay. The first .was dated Octo-
ber 2, 1837, and stated that his j49o.;hip in Council was
of opinion that the evidence that accompanied the com-
munication from Bombay, respecting the delinquency of
the Rajah was insufficien4 nod that his Lordship'a opi-
nion of the danger of becoming intuited In an indefinite
inquiry, had every appearance or being roditud, tend that
the evidence of the alleged intercourse with tue
e.
Rajah of Nagpoor, was in the highest degree vague
ist
and unsatisfactory.
Now, that ivae the op
that
inionof the Governor-General. it wuttid tippottr
the Bombay Government were desirous of getting rid of an
individual, whom hey, no doubt conscientiously, thought a
guilty man, and they communicated the documents to
the Governor-General, who, after carefully eXtitninin4
them, declared that he placed no belief in them, and
thought them of not the least importance.—(Hear, hear.)
The other letter was dated a few days after, on the 16th
October, and in this the Governor-General went again
over the same ground, and expressed still more strongly
the same opinion, adding, that the proceedings that had
been taken were not such as met with the approbation of
his Lordship in Council. There was a postscript to that
paper, in which the Governor-General stated that he had
lately received certain communications relating to the
subject, but that those communications did not alter his
opinion of the case. Now it appeared to him (Mr. Sa-
lomons) that nothing could be more creditable to Lord
Auckland than the wisdom and the moderation displayed

by him upon the occasion, as appeared from all thedo-cu-
ments which emanated from his Governmenemon the sub-
ject. He would next read a despatch from the G overnor-Ct
neral, dated July 10, 1830. The despatch, which was
read at length, expressed the belief of the Governor-Ge-
neral that the investigation into which the Government
of Bombay had entered should be brought to a speedy
conclusion, and that any attempt to protract the proceed-
ings would be highly detrimental to the character of the
Government. There was another (1650101 dated ;Tithe
13, also addressed to the Governor of Bombay, in Val
it was stated that any. protraction of the investigation
would be seriously injurious to the public interest; and
that despatch was signed lity, Messrs. Lushington) Jen.=
kips, and others. There was besides a despatch signed
by 'the same names, in which they stated that they
b:en_previousl.7 l'ipresseu• by
saw no reason to diSlent frog the ()pink% :Whkstt had
'Fte Hon. Director proceeded to say that he did not wish
the (.)ourt ofT)irectors.
to cast any censure upon he mWnbif Sir Mantes Car;
nac, however midi IA the tibiiiSk
be had ettfstipd aeon time subject under their.ctinsidera
tit)nt and he'(Mr. S,alditions) felt initeli tegret in alluding
to his conduct,, ikrhite he earth i Hot lOW it l 0 lidtpalifi6d
th.eN 'rt'e A ilumnet' ot either minutes; which
Rye did not think necessary to read; all to the same effect
as those which, he had gone thfOtigii: it appeared that
every means was had f.oo,tlf±l'd tti; Oh the pad of the (j!D
vernor of l3tsmbty, fOi the plifiioSe gfimbiatifig
Rajah, and that it ei,iit„6:ketitVriiettt bad been Wc(iftd;
Merely fair theiiiintrig a piioi.lndian Pritiee:
tile hat Minute Ito would fefer tO;
,was 00, from
Governor-oeneii% Dearing dii,Deol:ll36tl 4,8; WOO;
perk s,
that 664 Mae illiStaae; ant it appeared
the gatei-61 must have been September the . In
that despatch the Governor-General expreSsed His dis-
approval of any investicti6l6Vi I,l3eitt'O'dBmii ,h
prolonged, would ffeW, t 414
BritWo. 0m), mitk lad . the iiihi l3itahts. to sup
a,ll,l,l:edi:dot!tSproprietor then read an ,eat;
justify the course which had
;3tiirrin.eirip'6Zu*trlisueelt.a)
tract with respect to the treasonablf intercOkse which litid
taken place between tl)4l+4laWob and 4Dillepßtois
On brAtig %VW /361134 the
gbjith fib ,4 to refe tb
r the hf ufa,t qd-
vermichf. There WM bile thit
matter, whieh NAII'Ob4 `..4ift Should
beat ikk. %Akar. sic Ge'Vernol-General. in Cbuticil was
ekc'ebdlngly anxious that the Rajah should ati Optr
tunity of meeting the charge M s *1 bidt Ht
against him. The ,cVidthiA,*ii tl.ll WEtitiLiit
fegaided ite,ctisatrdtiA
we
tial,—very tir It Was (nick The Itajah was kept
entirety in tilt dtlt
ft knO'el, 'AA ti-i3i4k148144.6efal 4-iwea
should be bi‘iiilght under his notice, that he might otter
whatever explanation he pleased. In the interval be-
tween the death of Sir Robert Grant and the arrival of
Sir James Carnac, the affairs of Sattara were again
reviewed by the Supreme Council ; and while he must
admit that it was the opinion of all the members of the
Council that the Rajah had been guilty, as far as the evi-
dence was concerned, the witnesses were of a very low
description, and there was scarcely any of the evidence
given which was not liable to suspicion.
A new actor entered upon the scene. Every
one of the Proprietors would agree with him. in
their personal esteem of Sir James Carnac, that he was
a most attentive Director, and a most kind-hearted man.
The handsome testimonal which ho had received from
the native population, showed that if kindness of heart
had been the only qualification necessary, a person
better adapted to further the interests of India could
not have been selected by the Court. But he must also
state, in reviewing the conduct of Sir James Carnac as
he found it detailed in the evidence laid before the
Court, that • that was precisely what had led to his ji4S-
condUct in his intercourse with t 4 Rajah. It was a want
of firmness in carrying out his con views—a. desire'lo
reconcile things which could not'
.reeoneljpit.prO,
Ming a half measure iutlti of fully cargius • out lie

views of the Court, which had led to the failure of
the attempt.—(Hear, hear.) When Sir James Carnac
arrived in India he found all the authorities prepared to
depose the Rajah ; he himself being free from those pre-
judices which were rife in Bombay. He seemed, after awhile,
to yield to the influence of the atmosphere which he was
breathing, although no stronger evidence was adduced
than had existed previous to his embarkation ; he ap-
peared unable to bear up firmly against those influences
which were operating to the prejudice of the accused
person. After some little hesitation, with a view of
bringing the matter to a conclusion, he proceeded to
Sattara, doubtless with the intention of serving the
Rajah, in compliance with the feelings which had been
expressed by the Court.—(Hear, hear.) This failure
was to be attributed to his attempt to mix up the ques-
tion of guilt and innocence. If, instead of this, he had
proceeded upon the principle that, regardless of guilt or
innocence, it was the part of an enlightened and powerful
State to bury his deeds in oblivion, he would have suc-
ceeded in his attempt. He pursued a devious middle
path, and that was the cause of his failure. Shortly after
his arrival, on the 19th of June, 1839, in India, Sir
James Carnac made a minute of three courses which
might be pursued towards the Rajah ; first, to sub-
ject the Rajah to a formal trial, and if he were guilty to
visit him with punishment; to proceed in the mode in
which national wrongs were ordinarily redressed by
taking possession of his territories ; and, thirdly, by ad-
dressing to the Rajah such remonstrances as might ap-
pear expedient, passing over his past offences, in the
hope that the exercise of clemency would give rise to
better feeling. Then he proceeded to say, that neither
the Rajah nor his adherents were very formidable, or
that they had nothing to fear, and that they could afford
*to act 3 with generosity. He was sure every one who
read or heard such sentiments would cheerfully respond
to them. Then came the interview between Sir James
Carnac and the Rajah :
" The Raja came to the-Residency -accompanied - by, a
small retinue. The interview was strictly private. No
one was present on the part of his Highness ; for, by his
own request, the only person who came with him was or-
dered to leave. Mr. Anderson, Lieutenant-Colonel
Ovans, and Mr. Willoughby, were present throughout
this conference. _ _ _

"I commenced by informing the Rajah, that I had
anxiously and carefully considered the whole of the pro-
ceedings in his case, and had, in common with all other
authorities to whom they had been submitted, become
fully satisfied that, misled by evil counsellors and low
and interested advisers, he had, on three occasions, ma-
nifested hostile intentions towards the British Govern-
ment. I reminded his Highness of the peculiar circum-
stances under which he was rescued from captivity, and
invested by the British Government with the so-
vereignty over his present dominions ; that this was a
pure act of generosity on the part of the EngliskGovern-
meat, not founded in any right of possession, since, owing
to the unprovoked hostilities of the Peishwa,the whole of the
Deccan had become ours by conquest, but simply from a
feeling of consideration and compassion to himself and
family, as the representatives of a fallen but once power-
ful dynasty ' • that his Highness must be aware that, by
the conduct he had pursued, he had forfeited all the ad-
vantages which he had derived from the Treaty of 1819,
and in virtue of which he became the head of the Sat-
tarn state : that, notwithstanding, the British Govern-
ment were willing, on certain conditions, to bury the past
in oblivion, and that, at considerable personal inconveni-
ence, I had come in person to Sattara, to endeavofir to
rescue himself and family from impending ruin. I in-
formed the Rajah that I was his sincere friend, and anxi-
ously desired to effect such an arrangement as would re-
storeiriendly relations between the two states. Finally,
.I recalled to his recollection the warning long ago given
to him by his friend, Mr. Elphinstone, against placing his
trust and confidence in Vakeels and low and intriguing
agents, and earnestly urged him to discard from his
counsels the numerous agencies lie had esta-
blished, and entreated him not to throw away this
the only opportunity which could be afforded to him, for
becoming reconciled to the British Government ; for, -
that, he might rest assured, however his agents might
endeavour to persuade him to the contrary, that I had
come invested with full powers to decide finally on all
pending questions, and that the terms which I should
offer to him had already been submitted to, and approved
of by, the Governor-General of India, and that the Home
Authorities had placed the settlement of all these ques-
tions in my hands, consequently he might fully depend
upon my having been vested with full powers.
"During this address, which I delivered firmly but in
conciliatory language, the Rajah evinced a considerable
degree of impatience, and frequently interrupted me by
abrupt declarations that he had committed no breach of
of alliance. When I had concluded, he stated, that he
regarded me as his friend and well-Avisher ; asserted,
that the accusations against him originated in the in-
trigues of his enemies ; that as long as the British Go-
vernment entertained the idea that he had cherished hos-
tile desii;ns he could agree to nothing, but this idea being
lie would coniiiif tio XLlT4iiftnlMlViif. 11159M;111 Ji dint
ligion or to acknowledge that he had been our enemy ;
that he would receive my conditions, reply to them, and
vindicate his conduct generally. Finally he observed,
that if I had not leisure to attend to him personally, he
could communicate what he had to say through the Re-
sident."
Now, as • a man, this mused Sir James Carnac in his
estimation. He must have known that his condust
would be canvassed at home ; yet, like an honest men,
he put down almost his very thoughts—every word of it
.nolo the language of truth ; but, as a statesman, he
Dive him the same praise.—(Cheers.) Was it
i, ~,
could no'
the Rajah's choler should rise when
any wonder tha:
• - ...i..n lanevage with great crimes. He
charged in such 1,...11 -- 0 .• .
- • --o friends who quarrelled. A.
remembered the story °,t b" '''er for mutual explana-
mutual friend brought tnem togek..— 0 them was, " If
tion, but the first salutation of one u. • ,
-,.
you are
yoti think lam come to make any concessw, - '', be
damnably mistaken,"--(A laugh.) That seemeu-..,
very much the character of Sir James Carnac's concilia-
tory language.
The DEPUTY-CHAIRMAN hoped"the worthy Proprietor
would read the rest of the minute. With great tact lie
read only such parts of the papers as suited his views of
the subject.
Mr. CLAIM thought it was very bad taste to interrupt
any gentleman in bringing forward a case; if he omitted
anything unfairly he left himself open to correction from
those opposed to him.
Mr. SALOMOMS did not think the observation Wft9
either just or deserved; but he had no hesitation in read-
ing all. :—" In rep to this) I repeated my former obser-
vations, and said that I hod Odle tint to prolong, but to
terminate these discussions, which bud no* occupied a
space of three ,years, and which had ended hi stititf,ifing
the highest eUtharitiest that his Highness had repeatedly
violated the terms of the treaty he had entered into with
the British poverntoeut f that, lied I come to Sattara to
inflict the penalty incurred by these iiitdatlons of the
treaty of 1819, further inquiry might pefitapq hoc been
considered dipedient, but that as I had come id Mier-
lbdk; iiiid iitti to punish; this was quite unnecessary.
'.Tara rase; flitifettiiefi.dgigitst, his Highness having been
established b3' it i_ihiiiii tif6tifithetl lioth oral and docu-
mentary, which from tne ffhittiitf idiii Circumstances
ithder whickit was obtained could not, iil fig viyittietff by
tthy po§milit* he materially shaken by any other esi
nave; and till that, i Arid require from his High-
itl4:4 it 4; thttt iietieefdrWard lie wcruld act strictly and in
good faith aetieftiihti to freitt' With the British Govern-
ment, and assent to two or threti Wier. tOnditio%
{ITT
IttelB itiezztertio,
Lions
syl .vetrheeatdetetio
intervalsn':jt.sullplP4ort'eci .1-iy iir'.;
ndersdn. Wiid infdillied the Rajah that the evidence pr -
Le6ti ititiiisi hint irti§ gd etrops. in
and convincing
that the ttigiiett aptithritio in indk had, without
exception, concii7red Ps iiiiiikiiik that the
he penalty pre-
scribed in the fifth article cf fl
l
. f'i_ ':fitifY slitrilicl en-
forced against him, and that tie strongly adtiOd hie High-
hese fd t(ttend to the friendly suggestions Of the attrettioff
itlid littdeet4 td OititAre togive hima second time the raj
% Ho lielifttl fitted, forfeiteti, It was with deep morti-
fiCa,tion and, regret that I &JOAO the
OFthese observe-
lone Prlidneed eio effect whatever en his llightulg. In
oft ilieOftil€; &Ai he might at tmcc become fully ap-
prised of all the Ceilidifidli4 of the ptoy4ed amnesty; I
deemed it advisabl? to put into his litifid64 ilfOrftttil inewro-;
fanduni in which they had been emboelluth iliftivg
*Filled'iliig; if apparently apparently with great earnestness, ills
Itilhli fettiffied M 4 iiiOnorandum, and at once said lie
Would ntit agree id Illy Edildbions, asking me to
tiVeisiitiii ,1441,4 t kiolatipti4 Of fhid Tottty. he lad been
`,',1!i1t.!7: et: rI6 itii Oki 140i-hied that th're'e Imp:trout
violations of the Treat3i ikaf: lAA k'
fu gitiriBi him i----..
I.sti.. of the sth Article, in having, aril* it 0:110' of
Yekh;.. old inlprpper communications with the (leg
ll
iiih'dili 4 ddt Om/Imp article, in having held a elan-
•asirl iii*iitigt.Witti it ilia 8414,ibt the ex-Rajah of
acridfe: 3d: _Of lial'in4: tilnaP'efed With 001 u!tive effi-
-66c3 4 ihg idd fteio'fireni,uf ghttie 4-501; IV3
11411: Neiiiiltleii 11140 lii litg liiklin6Ss' MAO. iU fly!
2d of these charges, and was very feiilSfliONW: :1* On:
`fiction being that the Rajah felt at the moment ceilgt•l44ig
Of his guilt; had stated, that sonie of Appa Sahib's ori-
kihill leti6igljA
Ail f?dlen MI Ora hands of the British Go-
Oki' tic etrtld deny the fact
ii:itimeni;; VI • alt p
yea 'o*. iN Ftifii: Re %El not
d the'se leitefS haVik
itiii 'would hVe lie& natural oft Ad Miftlift-g3oi tif
IfMß.4ofiriel fliii. iitileti i tiiieet atisswer bY .Obseritig.i that,
"The circumstance Cif ft:66loi* leiiete dil net constitnit
guilt on the part of him who receiiTd tam: A ftif,.Si
from a person does not establish guilt against the pafty
to whom it is addressed. Where are my answers ?
There is Mr. Anderson : he may receive a letter ; but
this would be no proof that he answered it, or that he
committed any fault in receiving it.'
" I closed this conference by informing the Rajah, that
the Resident would wait on him the following day, with
a correct written statement of the conditions on which
friendly relations between the two states could alone be
restored, and that his Highness would be required to sign
these, as a supplement of the treaty of 1819. The Rajah
assented to receive the Resident ; and when he was
about to take leave, I again earnestly exhorted him se-
riously to reflect on the consequences of his rejecting the
very moderate terms offered for his acceptance, to dis-
card the crowd of interested agents now in his confidence,
and warned him that, if he rejected my terms,, he could
only blame himself for whatever might. be the result., On
stepping into his carriage, the Raj ah made a kind of apology
for the discussion he had occasioned ; but turning toward.
the Resident, and looking at the paper of conditions
which he had returned to the Resident, he observed :
4 yeh Englinz oopur toomko izar howengee ;' which. was
interpreted to spiry a threat, that he (the Resident)

- ,t= •

~.,,:'7,.•;,..:-:r4.t,,,'.:;:nr:.,.,.,..F.A,