The Sun.
London, England, 1847-06-01 00:00:00

rgir
NO

eon
tife
;00.
thie
our
rde
the

id-
big
wo
r 9,
er.
)11,
•dg
,po

to say, that he had received a letter from Lord Bere-
"ven, contradicting that statement. The Right Hon.
Gentleman having read the letter said, he deeply
rcgretted the alteration which the Lord, had made, and
he feared it would greatly prejudice the good working of
the measure. But it was understood that the Lords had
given way in a great many things, and he therefore was
of opinion they ought nut to peril the safety of the
measure.
Mr. POUIETT SCROPE explained. His object in
making
the statensents referred to, was merely to
show the unwillingness of many landlords to bring the
Relief Act into operation, and in doing so, he instanced
the case of the workhouse of Bantry, to show the mis-
raanagernent which had taken place. He begged how-
ever to say, that the statement he made in reference to
Lord Berehaven was completely confirmed by six gen-
tle men nof Bantry, including the Catholic: clergymen of
that place, and it was not upon newspaper authority he
Made it.
Sir B. HALL called attention to a printed paper
ordered by the other House of Parliament, where 600
ejectments were issued at Ballina sessions. He would
ask the Hon. Gentleman was this the romance which he
B,ltiel was indulged in with respect to the Irish landlords ?
B•Ite looked with great jealously on the conduct of some
Aoble Lords in the other House with regard to this
and he thought it right to say that the Noble Lord
Y Whom the leadership was assumed had not taken a
very disinterested part with regard to it.—(Hear,
"ear.) He would ask that Noble Lord (Lord
ldonteagle) if he himself would be inclined to
have the principle of no out-door relief applied to him-
aelf ?—(Laughter.) He was Comptroller of the Ex-
Virlecicer, and received a large sum yearly for that office.
°cid he be inclined to have that relief limited to a
Year and a half's duration?—(Laughter.) There was
ttthe.r Noble Lord also (Lord Abinger) who
tongtated that
Pirinciple of out-door relief would lead reat im-
s;„raLitY, that he looked upon such assertions with great
she-T:ct°c•—(flear, hear.) As long as the poor added to
s importance of the Irish landlords at the polling
ttland they were fostered and looked after, but now
at this state of things no longer existed, and
tebat the 40s. freeholders were disfranchised, they were
ill:),nsigned to death in Liverpool.—(Hear, hear.) At the
I•sent moment the English towns were crowded with
serls PauPeers—all of whom should be at home, and
wypho rtd by Irish landlords.—(Hear, hear The
435°1e rates to the poor in Ireland during last year,. was
silts twenty millions,
stac,,l°Nl, or about 7d. to the pound. Now, it was
`',l that this annual vulue of the rental of Ireland
and he would ask, in the words of
statel.Randolph Routh with such resources, ought such
iisii
of things to exist ? (Hear, hear The Eng-
poinPeople were obliged to forego many relaxations,_ in
Which o„f taxation, to which they were entitled, andd.
t `coy would have obtained, but for the expen. l-
ure
13•equired to meet the distress in Ireland, and which.
ught to have been provided for by the landlords of
tlrseland---(Hear, hear.) He thought the conduct of
nue tchabitants of the metropolis had been most gener-
ths and
r, worthy of all praise.—(lronical cheers.) He
deal the effect of this clause would lead to a great
Irishf ejectment, and to a great deal of immigration of
that ~Paupers into this country. He hoped, therefore,
surte -eat Year the Government would introduce a mea-
s. t° facilitate the removal of the Irish poor.
ir Barron,explaina Mr. B. Osborne, and Mr. Callaghan
FRENCH did not mean to enter into the sub-
,tnatter under discussion, but be thought he had a
joeilt to under
of the way' in which the Irish land-
the tau were treated, and he did for them complain
the
Member for Dorchester (Sir J. Graham), and the Hon.
caber
lords for Stroud (Mr. P. Scrope). The Irish land-
taunt= ad in times past acted in a way to repulse all the
whichQ had been thrown out against them.
tar • '-'IIIART said be was surprised that the Hon.
shoot et the Member for Marylebone (Sir B. Hall),
placed have converted some language used in another
grou%largurnents on a public subject urged on publicd
the n's, into
att a personal attack, and should have abuse
areileges of the House, the freedom of speech to
a
speed, that person being absent at the time. Such
aien u, that seemed to have been written for the occa-
but toad addressed, not to the Speaker or the House,
pri,ii Public out of doors, was a gross abuse of the
and eigea of the House. He even named a Noble Lord,
groun`daunted him upon receiving a pension on the
Ile of holding a public office under the Crown.
had 0-hauled another Noble and Learned Lord who
neith4ee occupied a seat in that House, and said he was
Yell remark-able for his eloquence or his wisdom.
11
' WiSdnth at
Noble Lord, no doubt, would be quite a match ,
could °r in eloquence for the Hon. Baronet, if he
The Le: e had the opportunity of defending himself.
ground °Ted Gentleman then read a paper, on the
Ron. Bar' which he called the accusation made by the
Mr. vv. Baronet affainst the Mayor of Wexford unfounded.
were t, AISO'N said the question was whether they
they enact a union rate or an electoral rate ; whether
free theeld throw the whole burden on the towns and
for th country. lie spoke not to his constituents but
trtclrepri:se'ribt ecaluse the town which he had the honour
listed
and
yscieou:iest:OneYlvas then
the pr that was overwhelmed with destitution. He
would reinstate the original clause, for
The"--s system was full of tyranny.
Mr. m er,a,c't," when put, amid cries of "Divide,"
stand
Wh4s-'4I.RTHY rose and said he could not under-
"dtheriforthe
motion ho
nouse should secede from their opinion,
The e should press the question to a division.
For the rn
Rouse then divided, when there appeared-
-80
Against it
Majority for Government, and the Lords'
amendments
fir- D. NORREYS contended that the clause would
1,
" altogether inoperative, because, by its present con-
struction, it contradicted itself.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said,
that with a view to reconcile the discrepancies which
existed between one part and another, he had altered
some of the tenses in the clause. _ _

Mr. M. J. O'CONNELL said another difficulty would
arise from the difficulty of knowing where the applicants
for relief had been residing.
Sir R. FERGUSON said that a third, and perhaps the
treatest evil would arise from the derangement to the
workhouse account, occasioned by the introduction of
this clause. He thought that some little time should be
given them for preparation.
Sir GEORGE GREY said that ample opportunity
l'jould be given to arrange means to meet the change
w11:1,ell would be rendered necessary.
Clauses up to 17, were agreed to.
Clause 17 was negatived.
'
iter_ter a few words from Sir J. D. Norreys, Sir G.
.1,4, and Lord Hamilton,
pow': ATTORNEY GENERAL objected to the
tnovi, given under the present English poor-law, off
eertirig such cases into the Queen's Bench, by writ o
to, i'ra,r and he would rather take from, than give
rptil'etand the same power.
Douse then divided, when there appeared,
For the amendment
For the original motion 73
Tho Majority
„Amendments„ were then agreed to.
TtIe`INDED PROPERTY (IRELAND) BILL.
that CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved
Mr. Lord's amendments on this Bill be read.
es 't/ITZSTEPHEN FRENCH said that the Bill
fourthporfelserenland
tstrd, would be inapplicable to threes-
The amendments were then read.
that th RANCELLOR of the EXC,IIEQUER moved
Lordenntst amendment of the Lords be disagreed to.
coasen BENTINCK hoped the House would not
an tto the course proposed, but agree to the Lords'
„,'',endrnents, as they had done to the Lords' amend-
""'ts to the English Poor-law on a former occasion.
could The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he
not agree to the suggestion of the Noble Lord.
biDie recommended the amendments to be disagreed to
ecause they affected the pecuniary qualifications of the
h.. 1111, and were therefore an infringement of the
P/illEzps of 'that House.—(Hear, hear.) As a
`lllcation of privilege. he considered this as a matter
,
great importance ; and, notwithstanding what had
fallen from the Noble Lord opposite, ho trusted the
Ogpse would not depart from the usage of all former
Ihusai of Parliament in cases of this nature.
Mr. ii.b.'WDEGATE said the Right Hon. Gentleman
h 441 based the privileges of the House upon a very
itlerro i
w foundation. The Lords were allowed to nter-
e ,ere iTt platters connected with local rates, and
al he considered the funds to be raised
under this Bill were to be applied to local and not gene-
tal Purposes, he could not see why any questions
of
Privilege should interfere to defeat the amendments of
the Lords.
Mr. GOULBURN must resist the amendments of the
Lords upon the grounds stated by the Right Honourable
Gentleman. The peculiar privilege of appropriating
thti Public money was vested in the House of Com-
mons, and the House ought to be cantious that it
Was not infringed. Suppose they were to agree
these
finitely amendments, what might it not ulti-
whe !a, to ? Why, it might happen that
, this House voted 5,0001. to the navy, and
'MU to the army, the Lords might give this as an in-
stance for their reversing or altering that appropriation.
(lear, hear.) He must, thefore, decline to be a party
14) allowing the House to agree to these amendments.
r, AftPr a few words from Lord John Manners, Sir G.
Mr. the Chancellor
of the Exchequer, Mr. Lefroy, and
, J. O'Connell, the amendments of the Lords were
rejected.
Upon clause 29 being read,
VITZSTEPHEN FRENCH objected to the
-**4enuraent, on the ground of its interference with the
privileges of the House, it being a money clause.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said
that he would move that that clause should be agreed to
11 the House.
.gull plans© was then agreed to.
Thee 43 amended, was then read,
tIiattIeNCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved
t he amendmentarnenuaden be disagreed to.
The ffailoving t Was rejected accordingly.
to. two clauses, as amended, were agreed

Claude 55, with amendments, was also agreed to.
Several other amendments were agreed to, and seve-
ral rejected.
ordered
Th ll,be brought
The 'louse resumed
PESTITUTE POOR (IRELAND BILL.)
On ilia motion of the CHANCELLOR of the EX-
th
440 use went into Committee upon
this Bin.
what
The he CLIANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said that
now Propo•ed with reference to this Bill was,
that a further advance- should be made on the security
of the rates. Since August last 4,700,0001. was ex-
pended, but he was happy to say the old system, under
which this money was distributed, bad been nearly
entirely discontinued. The reduetiou whioh had been

v made, was greatly complained of, but it was attended
with great success, for it was effected when it was de•
sirable that the cultivation of the soil should be attended
to. Great indisposition was sho►vu to this proceeding.
They had every reason to believe that the resident pro-
prietary had endeavoured to keep the expenses within
toe strictest limits, for the ration system brought the
conviction home to their minds, that they should
either employ the people upon their estates and farms,
or feed them in idleness upon the produce of them.
The system which hsd been pursued was to encourage
the volunt ry principle ; and so far had it succeeded that
in many districts the wealthy had volunteered payments
to prevent the levy upon the poorer classes, with the
exception of some twenty-eight or thirty electoral over-
seers, the new system had been introduced throughout
Ireland, and it was progressing with the happiest result.
The Right Hon. Baronet then read statements from the
reports of Mr. Fox and others to show that there were
abuses when the food was given in kind, and that a
considerable change for the better might be anticipated
from the new plans of relief. He believed the course
adopted by the Government was the best that could have
been resorted to under the circumstances, and he hoped
the result would realise their expectations. The sum
he now applied for was 600,0001., and if it would be
necessary to have a larger sum before Parliament rose,
he would come down and ask it. The Hon. Baronet
concluded by proposing the resolution.
Sir J. GRAHAM said there were two points to
which he wished to call the attention of the Noble Ba-
ronet. Since August last it appeared that the sum of
4,700,0001. was expended in relief, one moiety of which
was to be repaid. Did he understand that the half of
this was to be repaid in ten years ? He wished to
know, also, as the Relief Act was in operation in 1,900
electoral divisions, and that the public works were in
operation in 68, and that 2,200,000 rations were daily
distributed, what was the estimate of the cost of all
this? Whether in every one of the 1,900 divisions the
rate would be struck, and whether it would be met?
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said
the estimate was 21d. per ration, and the total esti-
mated charges 2,651,0001. He had already stated that
4,700,000/. had been spent in the department of public
works, and would be payable in twenty instalments, the
first by next summer assizes. Ho believed that the rate
was already struck in every union, but they had no in-
formation as to whether it was being met.

Sir JAMES GRAHAM asked whether Government
could come again to Parliament for a second rate, until
the rate for the previous instalment was in the course of
being raised ?
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he
had not made any statement to that effect.
Mr. AGLIONBY regretted when so great sums were
voted away for Ireland, that Members should not under-
stand how these sums were applied. The Government
had no idea what was doing in Ireland. Statements
were coming out accidentally in the Committee in which
he acted, and the schism it would seem which had oc-
curred in that country between the officers and the
employed were quite appalling. He assured the Go-
vernment that it would be absolutely necessary for them
to obtain more immediate and accurate information than
could be obtained by the ordinary printed reports. He
thought the most serious evils and abuses prevailed, and
thought that it would be incumbent on the Government
to adopt some such measures as he had recommended.
Mr. LABOUCHERE said that the abuse spoken of
by the Hon. Member was the necessary concomitant of
the extraordinary measures which were adopted for the
amelioration of the miseries which had afflicted Ireland.
At one time the Government employed 750,000 persons
upon public works—a gigantic undertaking, such as no
Government had hitherto attempted. These great mea-
sures had been carried out without disorder, and the
people were kept at peace and in constant employment.
He believed that it was no matter of surprise that some
abuses had prevailed, for the operations carried on by
the Government were, he believed, altogether out of the
ordinary pale of legislative acts. He believed that no
Government could undertake to employ or to feed a
whole people, nor even such a portion of the population
as they had aided without much trouble and evil arising
from the measures which they adopted. He wished also
to correct the practice which existed of making sweeping
observations against the Irish gentry, for he knew very
many instances in which great personal trouble was un-
dergone, and great pecuniary sacrifices sustained for the
alleviation of the miseries of the starving peasantry.
In 1846 there were 100,6001. subscribed by private in-
dividuals, and from September, 1846, to May, 1847, they
amounted to 200,0001., so that there was not, therefore,
any want of public spirit on the part of individuals.
After a few words from Mr. AGLIONBY,
Mr. ROEBUCK said, that when he had heard the
landlords of Ireland spoken of as a class, he had heard
them described as not informed as to their duties; but let
that matter be as it was, he conceived that the Govern-
ment were departing from their legitimate functions in
their interference on the present question.
Sir J. GRAHAM differed somewhat from the Hon.
and Learned Member for Bath in his general statement
of the affairs of Ireland, and he fully sympathised with
the Government in the fearful emergency in which they
were called on to act. Still he thought it was time that
they reviewed their position, as be looked on the state-
ment of the Right Hon. Gentleman (tbe Chancellor of
the Exchequer) as anything but cheering. There should
especially be no misunderstanding about the 600,000/.
now spent monthly in Ireland in various works. Steps
should be taken to get it paid back, and rates in all
cases where practicable under the present law should be
levied towards liquidating these advances.—(Hear.)
Mr. ROEBUCK wished to know whether the Go-
vernmentitth oapr;eteasrjae?d.dwy,
Res:rine determinedimposed.
:sssEesfdu.several4lsuccessfully
aos
opposed
cases
to o
gentlemen
enforceed
th e i then
collectionlrpaymentlanolreland
h tahodef,
said that the rates would be
ratl7Joarldre
enforced as far as possible. With regard to the ge-
neral subject, it ought to be recollected by) the Right
Hon. Baronet the Member for Dorchester that
the time at which the Government was called
to act was one of great emergency.—(Hear, hear.)
people
The case of Ireland was one of 5,000,000 of not
dependingthemselves
te d wages,
whene s , but
that on
food the foodfaile
failed,
htihcaehs tstatehey
of society did not afford a remedy—society w
dis-
organised. They had not to do with granite, but with
a loose, friable sandstone. The proprietors had no hold
on the affections of the people, the landlords were not
respected by the ecclesiastics, the lower classes were
excited by speeches which appealed to their imagina-
tions ; they were not affected by measures which were
directed for their benefit ; and however much the House
might admire the patience and constancy with which
they bore the calamity with which Providence had
afflicted them, they could not disguise the fact
that that evil had been considerably heightened
by their own want of energy and foresight. It was urged
against the Government that they ought not to interfere
in a calamity like this ; it was urged that the Govern-
ment were travelling out of their way by introducing
measures to alleviate the sufferings which were daily ex-
perienced ; but when they found that these works
were successful in alleviating that distress—when they
found that much misery and much wretchedness had
been qombated, he thought that the Government had
so far proved their wisdom in bringing forward such
measures. The abuses attending the system adopted by
Government for the alleviation of this distress, had at
last the effect of inducing a better state of things, and
he trusted that the calamity which had already visited
that country, would, in conjunction with the poor-laws,
lay the foundation for a state of great and happier ex-
istence. He was still of opinion, that it was right for
them to adopt such measures as might meet the calamity,
and afterwards elevate the people in the scale of nations.
He hoped the House would grant its consent to thosa
sums; he did not ask the House to grant that consent
in the expectation that no abuse would be exhibited in
the expenditure of them, but he could assure them that
the fullest attention of the servants of the Government
would be given to the proper distribution.
Sir IIiNORREYS expressed himself satisfied with.the
statement of the Noble Lord, but still he could not help
feeling that the landlords of Ireland had been unjustly
treated by many Hon. Members in that House, and
particularly by the Hon. and Learned Member for Bath.
The truth was, the great body of the landed gentry
of Ireland had done their best to mitigate the sufferings
of the people, but they were besot on all sides by diffi-
culties, and perhaps their efforts had not been so suc-
cessful as they might otherwise have been. He enter-
tained no doubt whatever that in all they did Govern-
ment was actuated by the best feelings and intentions
towards Ireland ; but their ignorance of the real state
of things in that unfortunate country had led them into
many errors.
Mr. ROEBUCK said that the speech of the Hon.
Gentleman who had just sat down was a complete con-
firmation of what he had been saying throughout the
whole session in reference to Ireland, and the mode that
was adopted in reference to relieving the distress of that
country.
The resolution was then agreed to, and ordered to be
reported to the House to-morrow.
The Punishment of Vagrants (Ireland) Bill was read
a third time.
Lord J. RUSSELL brought in a Bill, to regulate the
payment of rates and taxes by Parliamentary electors.
Mr. WARD brought in a Bill for limiting the time of
service in the Royal Marines.
The
adjournedorders of
at the a
e day were
to ethtewno o'clock.disposed of, and the
House

ZENON, THE MARTYR. The marked success
the fortunesg of
whashicihndhuasce
in the shape of a narrative, illustrating
adttheinmdetdo
pthaet wfoorrtksh
aofptrhodeolleteivo,. Roifcahahrid
cha-
racter,Cheorbbold
historye
of the Christian
EZ emnpo
en r,
oar CDhormi s itai
ann. martyr,A t
the whopr
elsievoetd
tdi
mu ret,nwg htehae
aroe i gmno oe
hf th
at-
tention is being paid to the early
Ch,aahrurractio gs utchhe aa
dproductiono
f cannoth is h
efraoi
theto beao welcome.thor gigives
an
animated picture of the Emperor's Court, as In
themaohya idettsa
ial
an d
of meal
ananaei
er sa
l of
Ehoi sme principaldoriagntohbel es,
firstan do.introducesf
Christianity. To the general reader, and especially the
Christian reader, " Zenon" must therefore present claims o
his attention far superior to those which obtained so large a
share of the public patronage to the histories of "Margaret
Catchpole," and of " Mary Anne Wellington."
EXTRACT OF A LETTER FROM GIBRALTAR DATED
MAY 21.—" The appearance of the Straits for the last
three days forcibly reminds me of the return from
Epsom on the day of the Derby. I scarcely think
it an exaggeration to estimate the vessels pressing on
at 1,000 ; upwards of 200 had been long anchored
at Frogerola, in sight of the Rock, distressed
for provisions and water. The French steamers
were extremely active in seeking out and taking through
the Straits all vessels in which Frenchmen were inte •
rested, while England, with her boasted fleet of steamers,
. bad only one lying hero, with three leaky boilers, so
that if authorized to act she is compelled to be motion-
less. I fear a large portion -1 t';, Euglish cargoes must
be heated, some of them arrived here having been loaded
130 days.'

PARLIAMENTARY DIVISIONS.

From the Votes and Proceedings of the House of Commonr.)
MONDAY, MAY 31.
POOR RELIEF (IRELAND) BILL.

Lords Amendments agreed to, 2s far as pr. 10,1. 9:—
Amendment, to leave out from "Register" to " And," in line
26 :—Motion made, and Question put, " That this House
doth aaree with the Lords in the said Amendment." The
House divided :

MAJORITY-AYES, 80.
Aglionby, H. A. Ferguson, Sir R. Martin, John
Arkwrlght, George Forster, Mathew Masterman, John
Bailey, Joseph French, F. Mitcalfe, H.
Baine, Walter Gore, Montague Monahan, J. 11.
Bannerman, A. Goulburn, Henry Morris, David
Barclay, David Granby, Marquis of Morison, General
Baring,r. T. Granger, T. C. O'Brien, A. Stafford
Barnard, Edward G. Greene, Thomas Parker, John
Bell, John Grey, Sir G. Iteid, Colonel
Bellew, R. M. Hamilton, Lord C. Rice, E. It.
Benett, J. Harris,;Captain Russell, Lord John
Bentinck, Lord G. Hayes, Sir E. Russell, Lord C.
Berkeley, Captain Heathcoat, John Itutherfurd, A.
Bernal, Ralph Henley, J. W. Sheil, R. L.
Bodkin, J. J. Pildyard, T. B. Stanfield, W. R. C.
Brooke, Lord Hobhouse' Sir J. Staunton, Sir G.
Brotherton, Joseph Hodgson, Richard Stuart, J.
Burke, T. J. Hope, Sir J. Strutt, Edward
Chaplin, W. J. Hudson, G. Thornely, T.
Chichester, Lord J. Humphery, Aid. Trelawny, J. S.
Colvile, C. R. Inglis, Sir It. Wilshere, W.
Copeland, Alderman James, William Wood, Sir Charles
Craig, W. G. Jervis, Sir John Yorke, Henry R.
Crawford, W. S. Jolliffe, Sir W G. H. Young, John
Denison, W. J. Jones, Captain
Divett, Edward Labouchere, Henry TELLERS.
Duncan, George Macaulay, T. B. Tufnell, H.
Dundas, Sir David Mangles, R.:D. Itili, Lord Marcus

MINORITY-NOES, 16.
Boyd, John Howard, Sir R. Watson, Henry
Browne, R. D. Layard, Major Williams, W.
Browne, W. M'Carthy, Ales.s.nder
Curteis, H. B. O'Connell, M. J.
Duke, Sir J. Perfect, Robert
Escott, Bickham Roebuck, J. A.
Hall, Sir Benjamin Tancred, H. W.

TELLERS.
Norreys, Sir D.
Callaghan, D.

Clause D read a second time :—Amendment proposed to
lesave out from " Balances," in folio 2, line 11, to the end of
the Clause :—Question put, " That the words proposed to be
left out stand part of the Amendment." The House divided :

MAJORITY—AYES, 73.
Aglienby, H. A. Fox, C. R. Ord, W.
Arkwright, ti.. Gardner, J. D. Owen, Sir John
Barclay, David Gladstone, Captain Parker, John
Baring, F. T. Goulburn, Henry Peellell, Captain
Barnard, E. G. Graham, Sir James Rice, E. R.
Bellew, K. M. Greene, Thomas Rutherford, A.
Bentinck, Lord G. Grey, Sir G. Seymour, Lord
Berkeley, Captain Hall, Sir B. Sheil, R. L.
Bodkin, J. J. Hanmer, Sir J. Shelburne, Earl of
Bretherton, J. Hasti., A rrhibald Somerville, Sir W.
Buy., Charles Ilobhouse, Sir John Stansfleld, W. R.
Burke, T. J. Hodgson, F. Staunton, Sir G.
Byng, G. S. Hope, Sir J. Stuart, Lord J.
Cavendish, G. H. Howard, P. H.' Strutt, Edward
Clay, Sir W. Inglis, Sir R. Tancred, H. W.
Clerk Sir G. Jervis, Sir John Thornely, T.
Coivile, C. R. Labouchere, Henry Vivian, J. H.
Cowper, W. F. Lockhart, W. Ward, H. G.
Craig, W. G. Mangles, R. D. Winnington, Sir T.
Crawford, W. S. Martin, J. Wood, Sir Charles
D'Eyncourt, C. T. Mania, Fox Young, John
Divett, E. Mitcalfe, Henry
Duncan, George Monahan, J. 11. TXLLEII.S.
Dundas, Sir David Morris, David Tufnell, Beery
Farnham, E. Newry, Viscount Hill, Lerd Marcus
Forbes, W. Northland, Viscount

MINORITY-NOES, 19.
Barron, Sir H. W. Hamilton, Lord C. Norreys, Sir D.
Boyd, John Harris, Hon. Capt. O'Connell, M. J.
Callaghan, D. Hayes, Sir E. Watson, W. H.
Collett, John Henley, J. W.
Copeland, Ald. Hussey, Thomas
Dickinson, F. H. JoMfrs, Sir W. H.
Evans, Sir De Lacy Jones, Captain
Hamilton, G. A. M'Carthy, Alex.

TELLERS.
Ferguson, Sir R.
French, F.