The Sun.
London, England, 1841-02-24 00:00:00

might go down once or so for the purpn-e. not indeed of lend-
ing much assistance to the Right Hon. Gentleman opposite
(Mr. Goulburn)—l might go down on some pressing occasion,
but disgust would soon weary me out. And now, what must
the Iris farmer do, who is much more -helpless than I am,
when he finds himself exposed to these great vexations
and obstacles, which the Noble Lord's Bill throws in the
way of his acquiring the franchise.—(Ministerial cheering. )
I think, Sir, however imperfectly I have explained myself, that.
it is my duty to give areason for my belief that the great object
of a Registration Bill is the keeping out of voters that ought t o
be kept out, and the letting in of voters who ought to be let in.
The Bill of my Noble Friend is decidedly superior to the Bill
of the Noble Lord opposite for this purpose. But is there
anything in the means employed by the Noble Lord which
does serve the useful purpose of making a salutary Registration
Bill, and which ought to be adopted ? My Noble Friend de-
fines the franchise. The Noble Lord proposes to leave
the franchise undefined. Is it possible to doubt there
is anything more important in this subject than that
definition of the Irish franchise? I will not go into the ques-
tion whether the minority of the Judges ought to be bound by
the majority.--( Hear, hear, from the Opposition.) Ido not
pretend to speak of it as a lawyer. I might ask some ques-
tions ; I might make some distinctions which I would be glad
to hear solved ingenuously by the Hon. and Learned Gentle-
man who has just sat down. But I will not go into the ques-
tion. We have the plain fact that eight Judges are for one re-
presentative system, and four for another ; twelve or fourteen
Assistant Barristers are for one representative system, and
eighteen or twenty for another. What was the law in Itl4o
is not the law in 1841 ; what is the law on one
side of the stream, is not the law on the other side ; what is
the law before the Chief Justice, is not the law before the
Chief Baron. Is it possible to conceive a state of things more
scandalous than this ?_(Ministerial cheers.) Why resist any
attempt that should be made to settle these difficulties. Is there
any more sacred debt from a Legislature to a people, than to
give definite laws? Is there any part of the law more import-
ant than that unon which the making of all law depends? In
Ireland this part of the law is in a state utterly, undefined, and
you leave it in that undefined state, and then you complain of
those very offences for which you yourselves are responsible.
Well, under these circumstances come forward two branches
of the Legislature, the Noble Lord on the one side,
and my Noble Friend on the other. The latter as-
certains the franchise —he fixes the law. The law
of procedure becomes simple and efficient—there is no vexa-
tion caused to the rightful claimant—the wrongful claimant is
at once removed. He (Lord Morpeth) guards against per-
jury. The Noble Lord (Lord Stanley) comes forward, and
he leaves the substratory law in the state of perplexity in
which he finds it. He then sets to work on the law of pro-
cedure, and makes it ten times more embarrassing than it was
before, and the effect is what we might suppose—it produces
phenomena in his Bill, so strange as was hardly ever paralelled
in all legislation. One of these phenomena was alluded to by
the Right Hon. and Learned Gentleman the Attorney-Gene-
ral, and it is even more extravagant than it was repre-
sented by him.—(Hear, hear.) In the county of Dublin,
if there is an objection established against a vote tried before
the Assistant-Barrister there lies an appeal from him to any
one of three Courts which the rejected claimant may
choose, each of which Courts take different views of the sub-
ject. The fact is, the Court of Exchequer always decides in
favour of the beneficial interest class of claimants, and the
Court of Queen's Bench in favour of the solvent-tenant class.
The effect of this system is, that whoever is objected to in the
Court below seeks for victory in the Court above, and the de-
cision of the Assistant-Barrister for Dublin must take effect
by the rule of contrary.— (Hear hear.) It would
be a curious and strange case of casuistry to point
out how the Assistant-Barrister for Dublin is bound
to decide on this question. If he decide according to
his opinions and the dictates of his conscience—and his deci-
sion will probably be reversed in the Courts above— will he
then decide contrary to his opinions in order to have that de-
cision reversed, and the effect produced that he felt it his
duty to bring about? Is this a mere oversight? No. This
is one of the effects of the attempt to proceed with the sub-
stantive law undefined. All the objections resolve themselves
into one—the principle of finality. The question is, will you
disturb the Reform Bill ? I will not at present go into that
subject generally.—(Opposition cheers.) I will not
go into that subject generally, I say, because 1
propose to reason on . this question upon those prin-
ciples which are held by all those Conservative Gentle-
men that I have the happiness of knowing. I propose
to reason on those Conservative principles, and if on those
principles I cannot command the assent of Gentlemen oppo-
site, 1 will not appeal to the principles of popular rights-and
popular liberties. I will admit that the Reform Bill, ought to
be continued inviolate, that it ought to be in full force in Ire-
land. Is it in force in Ireland? Certainly not. If the
meaning of the Reform Bill be that the beneficial
interest test be applied, then the Reform Bill is
not in force, for there are counties where the solvent tenant test
is applied. Is the meaning of the Reform Bill that the solvent
tenant test be applied? Then also is the Reform Billnot in force,
for there are counties where the beneficial interest test is
applied. These things are changing backwards and forwards,
and the counties in which the beneficial interest test was ap-
applied last year are different from the counties in which it is
applied this year. Now, if any person would define such a
principle, is it by leaving all things as they were before ?
Such a state of things amounts to finality.— ( Ministerial cheers. )
From an exceeding aversion to change, you uphold a system
with a principle which is ever changing.—(" 11 ear, hear," from
the Ministerial benches. ) I speak to reasonable advocates of
finality—to gentlemen who use the word only in the sense in
which any man, Conservative or Whig, ever used it. Wheel
they talk of finality, is it not that a certain Act should
stand unrepealed in the volume of the Statute Book ?
This then is the course pursued, to give to fluctuation such as
was never known among a civilized people, the name of stabi-
lity--( Cheers)—and then if the friends of finality come forward
to close this eternal whirl of revolution, to cry out that we are
unsettling the stability of our institutions.—( Cheers. ) Sta-
bility! When your representation may vary from September
to May, and one system be upheld in the Court of Queen's
Bench, and another in the Court of Exchequer ! Stability !
When, whether the constituency of a county shall be %WO or
4,0110, depends upon such a fact, as whether Mr. Baron
This or Mr. Justice That shall have a fit of die
out before the next assizes ! (Cheers and laughter. )
The question is not between change and no change
the question is between unchange and eternal succession of
changes--(Cheers)—between the Legislature and the Courts
of Law. Now, I conceive all reasonable Conservatives will
acknowledge one change to be better than a hundred. I con-
ceive we all agree that changes in the Constitution ought to be
made in the Legislature, and not in the Courts of Laws—
( Cheers.) Consider in what a situation you place the Courts
of Law. Is it possible toimagine anything more shocking to
any person of just feeling, than that when the Judges meet
to settle what circuit they shall take, they determine which coun-
ties shall have a democratic franchise, and which a restricted
one ? It is impossible but that it must deprive the judicial body
of the respect of society.-(Hear, hear, from Mr. Shaw.) I
am glad to hear the Rigon. Gentleman cheer me, but I
fear I shall find him opposing the only efficacious remedy.—
(Cheers.) Ido say I can conceive no system more pernicious
than that a Government should depend on the feelings of in-
dividual Judges, and that when a new Judge was appointed
it should be said—" We have got a new Judge. We
have lost Kerry, but shall have a change in Sligo." Is it pos-
sible to conceive a system so opposite to morality and to all
good feeling? Vote for my Noble Friend's Bill, and you will
be out of this situation in three months.—(Cheers.) I say
the necessary effect of such a system is this, that our free con-
stitution and the administration of justice is alike in danger.
You have on the one hand the Constitution quibbled away by
the subtlety of the bar, :and on the other hand, you have the
judicial tribunal agitated with all the violence of the hustings.
—(Cheers.) The greatness of this evil is not disputed, and
how does the Noble Lord deal with it? My Noble Friend fur-
nishes a measure which will at once put an end to it. It is
impossible after my Noble Friend's Bill passes, that the question
can divide the Bench of Ireland longer. The Noble Lord
(Lord Stanley) leaves the question unsettled. He only
plunges the Judges deeper and deeper into the mire, and gives
them a greater number of questions to try to which the pre-
cise difficulty applies. Of all the persons who cats complain of
the Noble Lord's Bill, there are none who can complain so
much as the Judges. The Noble Lord, Sir, can feel for your
situation. He addressed you in words to the feeling of which
every gentleman of both sides of the House will respond, and
which I would attempt to repeat, could I give them the same
grace and propriety ; but in thinking of your situation, Sir, he
forgot the situation of the Judges.—( Hear, hear.) Con-
sider how different the, cases. The Noble Lord, who scruples
to give to a person who ought to be impartial the nomination
of the persons who are to decide our causes, has no scruple to
give the power of deciding political cases to persons whose re-
putation, of all others, should be the least unsullied, and the
least subject to suspicion.---( Cheers.) To me it seems beyond
all doubt that if the Noble Lord's Bill passes there will not be
in a short time, a Judge in Ireland, however pure his inten-
tions, or however great his sagacity, who will not be called an
oppressor by the one party, and a disgrace by the other.—
(Cheers. 1 Now, to sum up, it appears to me that the Bill of
my Noble Friend will exclude those who, under the new system,
will not have a right to vote, while it will admit the greatest
facility to those who will have that right—that it will substitute
certainty instead of doubt, and rescue the Judges from the most
calamitous position in which they are placed. The Bill of the
Noble Lord will not do this. It provides no sure security against
the intrusion of wrong claimants, and throws every imagin-
able difficulty in the way of the rightful claimant, and it leaves
doubt, and change, and revolution where it found them.—
(Cheers.) Instead of telling the Judges what is the meaning
of the law, it leaves it unsettled, and only gives them another
set of questions to decide. I think whatever parts of the
evil system the Noble Lord has touched is only to aggravate.
He has left it uncertain that it may be made oppressive ; he
has degraded the Judges that he may disfranchise the people;
he has provided a machinery which, where it detects one per-
jury will introduce twenty. I hardly know on what principle the
Noble Lord can vindicate his Bill.--( Cheers.) This is the
Bill which the Noble Lord places side by side with others ;
and this suggests to me a topic on which I will say three or
four words. The Noble Lord misrepresented yesterday the
whole nature of his Bill, and of its relation to owes and their
relative relations to the franchise. He said. his Bill and ours
considered as Bills of Registration, were not essentially differ-
ent, but then, says he, " comes the franchise as a tack ;" now
that I utterly and altogether deny. I say the rule laid down
with respect to the franchise, is the essence of our Bill,`
(Loud cheers from the Opposition. ) And I say, wheSi the
Noble Lard brings forward a number of clauses of sty Noble
insa yyuso if
r
Friend's Bill analagous to clauses of his own,.h,aesamd
there were oppressions in my Bill, why place
~
own? the answer is, that having that franchise clearly
ascertained in the Government Bill from osse end to the other,
it turns that which in the Noble Lord's Bill would be a source
of litigation and mischief into that which may be efficient and
useful. As to the feeling, Sir, with which these Bills are re-
garded in Ireland, though I may regret the warmth with
which persons in that country have sometimes expressed them-
selves, I think it right to make the most ample allowance for
'this, because I am satisfied the question is, Shall Ireland have
the reality, or only the name of an electoral system ? In the
decision of that question, Sir, public order is as deeply in-
terested as public liberty.—(Loud cheers.) And 1 was
glad to observe that the Hon. Member for Cavan

expressed the opinion that any. great restriction or
diminution of the number possessing the elective franclihre
in Ireland would be a serious calamity to the country, We
have lessons enough to prove it to us—lessons many or Which
are not forgotten. It is unnecessary to state, after, the warn-
ings we have had, that great bodies of meet, that all
nations, when debarred from those organs which the Consti-

tution gives them, will certainly find other organs more for-
midablv.—(Cheers,) It is unnecessary to loe'a back any great
length of time for the effect that would be produced, if Lime-
rick, Cork, or Mayo, were represented in. this House by chiefs
of the Orange Society, or by those of the:, old Dublin corpora-
tion.—(" Oh, oh," from the Oppositi,Jn. ) Some Gentlemen
who make that cry may remember 1820; they may remember that
when there was not a single Catholic in either House of Parlia-
aaent, even the Duke of Wellington shrunk from conflict with
the excited population of Ireland. We might learn that lesson
from other times. The time when the Catholic Question was
settled was a time of peace. There have been times different
from that—times whoa England has been. forced to struggle
with formidable enemies to maintain her place among the na-
tions of Europe, It was so during the American Revolution
and the French Revolutionary war. During both we
endeavoured to govern Ireland like a conquered pro-
vince, and what was the result ? During the Arlie-
rican, war they wrung from Sou in your own despite
an acknowledgment of the commercial independence of
Ireland, During the French war, they engaged in a fatal and

E V ENING EDITION:

-
,Initous struggle for independence. Happily it failed.:Tbest,iti
Lord Duncan had not (alien in with the Texel fleet--0,..11'e
" Oh, oh," from the Opposition.) There was such a tet.
such a fleet. If a great French army had landed in gepr,-.1
that struggle would have tasked us to the utmost. But
tee
that struggle we were preserved by the great, but ill-1074
favour of Divine Providence. But still th‘ hea
was not small, it was not a small evil
the French armies were conquering beyond the"? 43
nines and the Rhine, the English troops were not rfe%
Buonaparte and anticipating Waterloo, but making o'er
our own subjects.—( Cheers. ) It was no small evil that 401
Massena, Macdonald, and Moreau were marching at the!'„j,
of their victorious troops, our own Abercrombie and CoreqA
lis were displaying their talents and long
the very men whom, under a better system, ;ti,
have led to victory. The retribution was Just sea coer
rat, and necessary, for a power greater than the p melt
of Parliament has decreed, that a Government I, 1,
hall
seeks tranquillity and safety though injustice b
p tv
it in vain. Let not us fall into that error ; let us lis'ot
their cry while the people_ are imploring us as one men
insult, not to brand them, not to strike the iron deePe' otte
their souls, not to drive them to deipair by. injustice, e tis
experience 01;ati
subject them to the • worst kind of injustice-o_ol.
,
ranny of caste over caste and creed over c`.'„ 4
Let us reject the evil consequences which follow in the 1),
of the oppressor, and by so doing, wrest the most forinibilee r,
weapon out of the hands of the agitator.—( vehement
ing from both sides.) Let us cement the unity of feelirTfr
tween the sister island, and give a perfect security to tlia
gislative Union, which nothing can endanger but our goo
misgovernment.—( Cheers.) Let us convert that part °L dip
empire which has -so often been a source of weakness iteJ
grace into the means of glory and of strength—(Cheered
strike terror into the hearts of men in all parts of the 1..4
who envy our greatness, or would insult our honour, by ueltjoiti
twenty-seven millions of British hearts in one great eause,'oo
under one parental Crown. (The Hon. Gentleman 561'
amidst loid cheering from both sides of the House.) 0 01-•
. On the motion of Mr. BROTHERTON the debate ivedo
)ourned, and immediately afterwards the House adieu°
Five Minutes past Twelve o'Clock.
FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZE-

WHITEHALL, FEB. 22, 1841.
The Queen has been pleased to nominate, constitute, tbo
appoint the Right Honourable the Earl of Chiehesnle
Right Honourable Viscount Duncannon, and the B,(Pclefi,
nourable Sir George Grey, Bart., to be three of the e
astical Commissioners for England.

DOWNING-STREET, Fun. Short"
The Queen has been pleased to appoint Willougn Y
land, Esq., to be Colonial Secretary at New Zealand.
DECLARATIONS OF INSOLVENCY.
WILLIAM EDMONDSON, tailor, Liverpool. 11.
EDWIN SPARROW, iron-dealer, Rush
BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED. t.
HENRY ROWE, wine-merchant, Great Tower-m.l-
- WOOD, iron-merchant, Nottinghate'
BANKRUPTS. hilJ,lttig
• JOHN MORGAN KNOTT, stationer, CamP
wickshire, to surrender March 9 and April 6, at,tnosie;,,,
New Royal Hotel, Birmingham. Chaplin, Gray'V'„-eo,
London ; Ingleby and Wragge, or Arnold and 1131'.
mingham.
EDWARD YOUNG, scrivener, Newcastle-151,
March 18, at eleven, and April 6, at two, at the prodri
Commission-room, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Dell' Newelstio,
and Bell, Bow Church-yard, London ; Seymour'
upon-Tyne. p,
ARBUTHNOT EMERSON, THOMAS 1. irevo
JAMES BENN, distillers, Brookfield county Antrl'ouglA
March 16, at two, and April 6, at twelve, tue
Bankruptcy. Belcher, official assignee ;
James-street, Bedford-row.
LOSS*
PETER 'BLACKBURN, builder, Salford,
March 4, and April 6, at eleven, at the Commissioners 4
Manchester. Higginbotham, Buckley, and Lord,c;ii,
under-Lyne ; Rickards and Walker, Lincoln's
London. r ;
JAMES GAWEN, Irish provision merchant, Leweeiel:4:.
well, March 5, at twelve, and April 6, at eleven, ai,t 11.54,1'
of Bankruptcy. Johnson, official assignee, Basing,
rt
Jordeson, St. Mary-at-Hill, London. Fl`el
„ler,
WILLIAM GEORGE, musical instrument In- the t"
street, March 3, at one, and April 6, at twelve, at lotree
of Bankruptcy. Graham, official assignee, 33asingba
Starli_tg. :.ackville-street.
Metb
ROBERT M'GREGOR, grocer, Chesterbir
April 6, at eleven, at the Green Dragon Inn, 40' 1
at'
Sise-lane, London ; Roberts, hester. ....„„b
EDWARD BENNETT, bCuilder, Cambric/
April 6, at eleven, at the Hoop Hotel, Car,ibridk.e-etch,
and Son, Cook's-court, Lincoln's Inn, ',radon ; get Sr
bridge. gar7el.
JOSEPH DUCKHASH, carpet des%er, Piccatlilltkrqw
at twelve, and April 6, at eleven, at the Court of 1r it
friars"'
Graham, official assignee, Basingb all-street; Itus
j' ,04
s.
blit
JOHN STEPHENS VIRET and THOMAS ' 5, sty, rr.
KITCHING, lineniirapers, Ludgate-hill, IVlar„u!:„rt of 719 e,
rpuapsttctyw. elvlve,hiatrandore,orrnilci6a,l
aastsignelegni3asatintghheart;reeti
and Shaw, Friday-street, Chcmpside.
übli'
THOMAS BARNETT LOADER, map p
Werth-road, March 2, at twelve, and •April 6, at elsasiagb.et.
ho,
'st
er
Court of Bankruptcy. Gibson, official assignee, harcl-s,,t'irr
street ; Lewis, Church-court, Clement's-inn, Leei, "„ear
WILLIAM MASON, cotton spinner, Heywoea't-the
Lancashire, March 16, and April 6, at eleven, a a ;kliit
Hotel, Bolton-le-Moors, Lancashire. Clarke an uper
Lincoln's Din-fields. L.ndon ; Grundy, Bury. co's'
STEPHEN GRAINGER WHITEHoUSA
- ereood,
chant, Northampton, March 19, and April 6, at sher''
the Peacock Inn, Northampton. Vincent and vsr
Inner Temple. London. ren the
JOHN PROFFITT, jun., buckle-mardiaetuop, ator
laston, Staffordshire, March 5, and April 6, el ele, joe,
Swan Hotel, Wolverhampton. Rushworths, Stae ,5 DI
don; Watts, Wednesbury.
JONATHAN GUNTON, butcher, Cambritie
and April 6, at one, at the Hoop Hotel, Cambridroo. rer,
croft, Guildford-street, Russell-square, don'
bridge.
.1'33
DIVIDENDS. 1011,,
March 18. H. Prior, Sise-lane, , stationer, 'tit. I)6ii:c°
eleven, at the Court of Bankruptev YMarch 111;1334r
Old Jewry, linen-factor, at eleven, aq the Court e'
dealer
cve
—March 16. H. Coates, Colchester, Essex,atle
twelve, at the Castle Inn, Colchester—March 2. •"ti,e Sbe,Flt
Boston, Lincolnshire, corn • merchant, at one,datiirig,
a `Tof',t
Inn, Boston—March 17. C. Johnson, Glamfer
colnshire, innkeeper, at one, at the Lion t, Y,
Briggs--March 23. J. Fletcher, Liverpcol,
the Clarendon Rooms, Liverpool—Marc h 16. $
sing, Essex grocer, at one at the Cr Ips Ilete" ert-de
March 18. ,C. Honey, Littlemore Oxf.drdshire, ee- 0 tom
twelve, at the Townhall, Oxford—? March • 660'50'
Wyton, Yorkshire, merchant, at tw dye, at the
Kingston-upon-HUH—March 24. E.. ThomP,seTgstoo4'.oceri
upon- Hull, merchant, at the GeOT ge Inn, „'',.l,senlge
Ifull—March 26. A. A yre, Seaham Elarbour, vu„"
at twelve, at the Bridge Hotel, Bishop Weglin,-0t roet::
17. J. Stripling, Liverpool, ship-chandler, at °,llj.°o-'olle''
rendon Rooms, Liverpool—March 19. W. anurfoloiss' oier
Manchester, machine-makers, at eleven, et tbue;clie!ctebre'lteiliVO
Rooms, Manchester—Alarch 20. J. lf
~te ox, i‘jsi, t,
chant, at ten, at the Commissioners' Rooms, too,
toilet,
March 18. J. Goudie, Liverpool, merchant, ant 0.23,,,,kra,
Commissioners' Rooms, Manchester--March_,.l Pthe PT9.
Newcastle-upon-Tyne, merchant, at- twelve, at the goo"
Commission Rooms, Newcastle-c.pon-Tyne-- dal
Meatyard, Bristol, ironmonger, at the Con°
Bristol,
16. To"

CERTIFICATES.—MAacu
J. S. Janion, Kingsley, Cheshire, inalts'.reircldV,
Bristol, scrivener—C. S. Jacicson, Leeds, 11,°°-•,•11, lioreelt
chant—B. Barnsley, Greet's-green, West Breelo-411 f
J. Coleman. Ipswich, builder—G. W00d,,_..„1,0-Zel.
wharfinger—W. J. Simpson, Reading, brieLlso,
Canaell, East Dercham, haruess-maker;-T. gar 9
r 4/
grocer.
draPe-
PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED eiv Leer f,
E. Paul and E. Sellers, Balham, Surrey, b,zaar-
E. Hughes and M. Bates, Richmond, SurreY,
--T. Powell and G. Parker, Warrington, °lg. K tear`'
Longden and R. Ford, Liverpool, victuallers--iits,J.:i
and V. L. Chemery, Knightsbridge,' wine-mei:eh: 11. ti SIC
and E. M. Williams, Bouverie-street, Prin`e-ni A.
Gill, Leicester, woolstaplers—R. rind T. Infra secl_„,l
rock and Orsett, Essex, farmers.- S. Runciraaideeirod
berts, Hove, Sussex, schoolmistresses--W. Par
tc'
Chorley, Lancashire, cotton-marau facturers--,
E. Marsh, Speenhamland, Berkshire, boobselleers.--v%,
and G. Esplin, Wigan, Lancashire, clock-teak
ley and E. Parry, Great Guildford-street, S°d, Snr"r's-11
founders—T. Netherwood and J. Lockwee
ufacturif.
Upperthong, Yorkshire, woollen cloth olanars."-factaree)
Vergette and Co., Peterborough, woollen-cirkvisalers.--A'
and G. Wolf, Moorgate-street, pianofortebooksel
err„..6,
—R. Nichols and C. Nichols, Wakeficlll,_„..tiraP.. far
Thompson and Co., Ashton-line,er-Lyne, Co•ji
Turner and Co., Woodbridge, Suffolk, coPre,rotee:etter
regards R. Turner and H. Taylor—G. Viaclui F. ° 147'
Habergham Eaves, Lancashire, Ship carp enters;pols nFr 1y
Co., Maichester, commission agents, as far ailotchireorisbire'
ter and G. A. Ascoli—Q. Kennedy an( 1 At Selby,
tol, corn merchants—J. Adamson and Co.'Lp st
whaxfingers, as far as regards J. Adamson, 4g. aw
SCOTCH SEQULSTRA T..„w eb el
Jong GALLIR, Edinburgh, plumbers ildinburg";reb.,ooeli
one„ at the Roal Exchange Coffeee-how_Aey AP"
THOMAS CLEMIWSON, Annan, earlo-neensh"-'
Feb. 26 and March 19, at twelve, at the -
Inn, Annan. 511°171804
Wre,
Join( M'CLuaa, Linwood, Rercfrews-isarseen
Feb. 27 and March 27, at twelve, at the 1 1/1
Paisley. ap- oe'•
,nit-dealer. te Grsg
ALMMAIMER 11PNAH, Glasgow, $ll
MaroemhzT2,patLuoumem, aEtitt,heEodffi
incbeuorfM; Weddell' vob. 2-henge'
Signet
'Ave'
March 24, at two, at the Old "*.
Edinburgh. 1)4:
obis,
THE NEW PORTA.DLE,,edressill,ge Or"
size of a small Snuff Box, can be placed •11 trued. rye
and set to ring at any hour that luny be reel fro°
Guineas.
T. COX SAVORY,' seven o°l6
Watchmaker, &c., 47, Cornhal, London ( .of
Gracechurch-street)' 0 f Bri.„gite
ees het,
soiree
N.B.—A Pamphlet, containing a List
Goods, w •
Spoons and Forks, Silver Plate, Plated. ,wortiei
i
Clocks, &c., may be had gratis, or will be
o`,
post-paid application. rrell&-11
W
FLAT HORIZONTAL ~Ne. 9' 01
A. B. SAVORY and SONS, Watchmakers, in silver cs_jegs 0
Lonchni, opposite the Bank of England. Price These w ors ff
guineas each, in gold cases 8 guineas eribt'os. gTeat,sfeeoliarif
waistcoat-pocket Watches are recommend for I %stet,
t fat • se
and durability, the horizontal eseaPeT7es in a k g
suited to combine those important requi;,andte 1111r•isit bdifk
they are jewelled in four holes, have the e orhl_,.
toads, and maintaining power to continuit
die hreia .`"
wound. A printed warranty gii" Watches'
large Stock of elegantly ornamented La

s -------------------------- NI
1•1.11„`.. r,
. •
SUPERIOR LONDON TABLE
Carvers,
hyelrvory Handles, 14s. per dozen ; Dessert E: rov_e:i't', ... 1 :
54. 6d. per pair ; Table Knives,"i,' r:7 ,
handles, as. 1141. per dozen , Dessert, 6s. d. ; ' ,srv'i pot
per pair ; Globe-shape Tea-urns, 4 quarts, tas• *; ser,,se et of
39 ; Papier Macke Tea-trays, gothic shape/CO; t` ,
full sizes.
ingCiarthonlomgounegsercyonatnldincinugtlethrye,Pgz!act°,is..f el".
, eo,o
RIPPON and 111.111 TON, Wells-sirs, t Oiford'"r
,
Established 1420.
______.........._—..--. t• isteer:-;..T1 ___--
DIR-0. afeeo
On the lith inst., at Cheytve-row',-w - Chelsea Anne 0
Wilkie. the wife of W. B. I‘lseslkall,'T ..N., agl`d :4°' isto *l'
On the 19th inst., at New-grove,, T. 13rown,Esq.,
Elder Brother of the Trinity bouse.
----- rr_. ''of - . ‘,.h-iiiiC,, °,
London: Printed and Published by .lifir 111)`' ~...Si 01111
No. IP2, Strand, at The Sun Offset , 111 o• 1i."'4415113,4"
the county of illiddlesex.—Weduestich I iebrw"J-'•
article' it s f OW'.