The Sun.
London, England, 1841-06-09 00:00:00

f
VE ING t:Dri"l ON.

,Mr. BUCK presented peal ions fruit parishes -in
Devon, against• a fixed duty on rn.
Mr. SIDNEY HERBERT p.vesented petitions from
parishes .in Wiltshire, against the proposed .alteration of
the Corn-laws.

Lord STANLEY presented a petition from Imam-
shire in favour of Church Extensicat ; also si:weral yeti •
lions from the same ;:ounty again; :t any -a Iteration of
the (own-laws.

Mi. MACAULAY' presented a petition from a emigre-
t, ions of Seceders in Edinburgil, agaiy.,st Church-rates ;
also, a petition against the present Cory-laws:,
Mr. ILVIVES presented petitions from lyandswo:th,
Brixton, Richmond, and 25 parishes in the .noitroPolis,
against the present Corn-laws.
Mr. GREG- presented. several petition..s,,:signed. by
9,065 persons, praying; for the total repeal .or the Corn-
la ws ; also, from two Dissenting,Congregatit es in Meri-
onethshire, praying for the abolition Olturch-rates,
and the Ecclesastical Courts.

Mr. GEOEGE PALMER presented ;wt.,. •, yeti flops
from Essex, agattst :Inv alteration in. the.Cort.t.-;
Mr. E. BULLAU: iresented petitions. from %' he opera,'
Lives employed in .15 firms in the lotteries, pr lying for
an alteration in the Corn-laws ; and pe6tions fr ton New-
castle, Burton-on-Lent, and several other plat eg, to' the
same effect ; also a petition against Church-rate t:
Mr. WA DDINGTON presented five 'Petit ions front
Suffolk, against any alter:Atoll in the Corn-Law; 1. • .

Mr. G.1141,1:Y presentedpetition • from the
of:capier4 of land in Nottingliant,:hire, against, urn alte•l
=don in the Onm-laws.

Mr. SA:NEOIZI) pmented a petition fron Somer-
setshire in favour e the present system of . 'rn-laws ;
frow Willou, in So.rnersetshire, in favour of the fixed
.duty ; Lnd from sail manufacturers of East C. 'iinnock.
for a total repeal of the Corn-laws.
. Sir C. ...E.:IIIIELL presented two. petitions fro tri Sus-
sex against any alteration in the Corn-laws.

HANii.LEY presented a petition from L
shire, very numerously signed, against and• ahera 'ion in
the Corn-laws.

6ir T. TIZOUBRItGE presented a petition fri ire the
inhabitants of Deal, very numerously signed, in !tivour
of the G overnmeut propositions.
Lord GRANVILLE iI_OMERSET presented peti-
tions frdm. Monmouth and Gloucester, against• an y alte-
ration in the Corn-laws. - •

Mr..AINSWORTH ,presented several p etitioi is from
Bolton, and other places antLancmhire, . praying tOr the
repeal of the Corn-itiliTs. • -
Mr. T. puNcomßE presented a petition from Man-
chester, complaining of outrages -Perpetrated upon cer-
tain persons, assembled at that place to discuss
.the
Corn-laws, and praying the House, to make in( luiry into
the circumstances. Also several petitions a; ainst the
Corn-laws. Also a petition, praying for the n 2moval.of
clergymen from the Commission of the Peace. _

Mr. HASTIE presented twenty petitions frog n Paisley
praying for an alteration is the Oorn-laws.
Sir B. HALL prevuted similar petitions from Mary-
lebone.

Mr. WARBURTON presented a petition from 300
females at Bridport against the Corn-laws. Al.'io•a peti-
tion from Doreheeter against the taxes on corn and pro,
visions. Also similar petition§ from places in the same
county.

Sir R. CLIVE presented a petition from Si iropshire
against any alteration in the Corn-laws.

-Air. PhINGLE preSeMed several. petiti4 mis from
Hampshire against the Corn-Jaws.
Lord CASTLEREAGH presented petitions from Ire-
land against Church Patronage in Scotlands ax d against
any alteration in the Corn-laws. . •

Sir DE LACY EVANS:presenter). petitions from flit.
parish.of • St. J ames' s, Westminster, in., favour of the re-
peal,of the Corn-laws.
The Earl, of • LINCOLN presented a. petition from
Lincoln, -11,4*ainst any alteration in the Corn-latv.s
fir G: CLERK presented a petition -from Renfrew,.
against any alteration in the Corn-laws.

Sir J. Ca? AIIAM presented a similar petition from a
parish in rerk.

Mr. CRAWFOIII) presented a petition from the ward
of .Portsoken praying for the abolition of the Co. 7n-law;,, •
• -Mr. 111; Al I.; presented t petitions to-the same-effect,
some of them in favour of the three prop9sitions • of the
Government, and one praying that if, the Gom-laws,
should not be repealed, they Might besttspended•for three,
.years.—(Cheers.)
• Mr. CRAVEN BERKTlLEY7presented three peti-
tions from Cheltenham and its neighbourhood praying
for a repeal of the Corn-law-5.. .

!:31-IEIL preented a petition to the same effect
from the town of. Tipperary.
The ArfORNEY-GENERAI, presented eight peti-
tions from Edinburgh.. and its neighbourhood with a.
similar prayer.
• Mr. 'BRISCOE presented petitions to the same effect
from Chippenhan, from a:place in Surre.y, and-from in7t4
places in ‘Vilfshire.

- Lord H( MICK presNlted a petitidn-to the same effect
from a place in NordiumbertaTid.--- ' ''•

_Mr. WILLIAMS prebent4 petitions from places ill
Warwickshire to the same effect,

. .
Mr. VERNON SMITH presented two petitions from
the town of Northampton in favour of the commercial
measures of the Government ; also .11. petition from a
place in Northamptonshirc praying for an alteration in
the Corn-laws.

Mr. W. PATTEN. presented a petition from a place
in Lancashire against anv alteration in the Corn-laws.

An HON. NikotnEu on the Opposition benches pro-
sented ten petitionSlfrom places an Berkshire,
_prayiK
for a fixed duty on corn.—(licar, hear.) Also a, peti-
tion from a place in Cheshire in favour of the present.
Corn-laws.

On the motion Of Me. BAS.TTIOPE, the Churel--rate
Abolition Bill was read a first time, and ordered to' bti
printed.

TRUSTS.

INIACKIN2,I:.-)N begged to Ask the lion. the
Under Secretary of State for the Home Department a
question relative to the subject of a Conunissioa issued
to inquire into the ConsolHazion of Tiumpikc Trusts.
He Wished to know whether the Government intended
to take any steps in consequence of that Commission.
Mr. FOX .MAULS said that early in the Ses.ion, in
consequence of the Report of that. Commission, the Go-
vernment.had determined to frame a Bill founde.l upon
the Report of that COmMiSsion, but they did not mean,
during the present Session, 'to" press further than the
second reading, in order that the country might lave an
opportunity of considering the question .before the meet.-
ing of the new Parliament.