The Sun.
London, England, 1823-01-22 00:00:00

N.

fliade no mention of the advantages granted by-the State for the
reieforagrieulture in the remission of various hint which had
been removed from tbelands- within. the period.
The Lord CuAxpri.x.on. a.sked if the tenant was willing to
Surrender the lease and farm

Hog had no doubt bat that his client would be glad
to give irp Ink Lease.
Suunkii said, "the committee would willingly take it
back on payment °foe arrears of rent.
The Loup CitAWC$l.l.O)l. thought that the Court had al.
read ventured too far in listening to the petition. Here was a
party complaining that he had speculated on the lititte of agri.
culture in 1819, and that prices hail. fallen ,between that time
and 1821, front 735. to 445. for the quarter of wheat ; and yet
in 1821 he consented to a lease being executed. lie had -ap-
peered in Court within less than two years, and prayed to be
relieved from his contract, and tendered five out of seven
quarters' rent due from him, as the' amount which. he'expeet-
ed, by a reference to the Master, to be Balled ori.topay as ar-
reasr. Such a proceeding could not be allowed.. The petition
must be dismissed with costs.

.43E-TARTE Slit SAXES BUR.ROUGHS, 1)1 THE 'MATTER,
• OF FETCH. r LUNATIC.
The prayer of this petition was of the same nature with the-
last ; the lands are situated in Essex.
The Lout) CHANCELLOR Old that these applications were
becoming too much as a ritatter.citsoursts. Parties came there
who sought to be ;relieved fr*tri. thole `oloti contracts, which
must be always a dangerous thing "for that Court to grant.—
Suppose the case to be one of-reap. hardship, how:was he to
prevent the same application from all the farmers in Essex,
after granting relief in this instance ? In this very case, the
petitioner had acknowledged a rednction of .20 per cent. in
11116, and now.he asked for a reduction of 25per cent. more'
on that reduced rent, and all this without offering an affidavit
of the circumstances. fle could not .hear • the petition' in any
case, without an affidavit. ..I4et the petitioner make the It4te..
meet on oath, and the case might be mentioned at some other
time. If the tenants disliked their leases, they should give
them up.

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COVR, JAN. 21.
AND'OTUERS.

Mr. BELL rot ihe plaintiff said he had to object to the draw.
ing up of the injunction as not being sufficiently extensive to
effect the objects of the plaintiff.
Mr. AGAR here interposed, and said the Learned Counsel '
was now about to take up new ground by which. he must either
stand or fall. • • •
The VicE-Cualects.Lott said he wished Mr. Bell. would
direct his arguments to the propriety of the ffirthar extension of.
the injumtion.
Mr..Bet.t. said he only wished the, principles should be ex.
tended to the agreement between the parties.
The VICE-CHANCELLOR, said, what he considered on a for-
mer occasion, and now believed, was, that:ot neripapera en.
tered into competition with each other. Aimalarie one would, ,
think that if the Proprietors of i'MOtnittgl'aper were to letid
the use of his types to the Proprietor of. an
.Evening Paper it
would not .be.for a partnership purpose ; but on looking more,'
closely it possibly might be for a partnership purpose, inasmuch
as the allowance made for the use of the types.might, be more.:
beneficial than the injury sustained by reason of the existing
competition. Besides which, usage was is favour of the prac-
tice, which was further illustrated by the.cOndUct of Glassing,
ton himself, who, though Aware the usage had existed ever since
the year 1804, did not object to it till lately.', Glaiiiiigten had.
Caine into the concern in • 1814, and had become, by acquies.
cence, a party to the loan of the typei for. six UT eight years at
least. ,

Mr. BELL, thought the 'usage was egfainly evidenced by the
usage between the parties. - . .
The VICE•CJIANCELLOR .oblittiVett that the eustoni Seemed
to be borne Out by the.usage of the trade. ".
After a desultory conversation between his Honour and the
Learned Counsel,
The VicE.Ctlawcy, said, that unless Mr. 13e11 could
introduce new matter in support of the extension of the injunc.
sion, the motion fur' extending the injunction could not be
granted, because the Court would .not perMit itself to be taken
y a side.svind on . a question. respecting which it had already
pronounced its thxision.
The motion for the extension of the injunction was accord.
ingly refused ; and the injunction it-only su far in force as to
prevent the Proprietors of The Enghtth.ehrouiele, who are part
Proprietor's of The MorniN: Herold,• front using or ill terting
in the evening paper any information, procured at the expense
of The Morning Herald, before it shall have appeared in the
morning paper.

DLO:MARA r. TAlrr 114-DrA C6IPANY.
`This was a case which occupied the attention of the Court
previous to the holydays, and tUvollied u question as to the
mode in which it number 01* 14.4scin Amid.br. lait to :NHL
Air. lion NE now moved, behalf of the plaintiff, that
the sum now in the hands of this 'East India Company be paid
into Court.

Mr. 11°1E, who appeared for Mr. Baxter, consented to the
motion, if the words without prejudice to'Jir. Baxter" were
introduced into the order.

Mr. iloaxt had no objection to the introduction of these
words.

. „
21Ir. BEL L, ,tor the East India. Company had no objciftlon
to the mutton. 'A doubt, however, existed, 'Whether the ac-
counts had been balanced between the partieit. Thire wag also
an order for the payment of 6661. into Court by the East India
ComPahY. This ;mist of coarse be discharged.
Alr• HoRxE consented to this Suggestion, and the motion
was, with this understanding, granttd.-

COI/RT OF X1:4,1(1'8.48:5CH, Jag. 21.
BREA.CII UP PROM! L ov MARRIAGE.
At'PNIERso) I‘. LoVIX.
Mr. ADOLPHUS stated, that thiN was an action for breach of
promise of marriage, 'woolen by a widow Lady'agairist the de-
fendant, Captain of a \Vest Indiethip. She went out to De-
merara in defendant's ship, prior to her marriage with Captain
111`Pherson. In January, 11101, Captain Lovie came home,
stating that Captain 111Therson was dead. The lady was at
that trine residing in England, in a house which Captain 31Therson had given defendant 6001 to purchase, for her.
The defendant coming home from Demerara, came to the
hoose 'where she resided with her mother, and took up his
residence, professing honourable Roil to the plaintiff, whom
he intended to marry. letter would be put in, promising, in
the' most
.solemn words, to marry her on his return. The de-
indent hi forty years of age, the plaintiff a widow, probably
older than him, but that was no topic of defence in answer to
the action. He understood the detente intended' to he set
up would . be, that this paper, which would be put in, was in-
tended as a demise of the preniises which :41r. Lovie had pur-
chased for 3lrs...)l4Pherson, in which she had tilled up ablank
left with a promise of marriage, where no such thing was
meant or intended. He should show that, for the purpose of
lierritssing this poor woman, a warrant of attorney hail been
fictitioosirfillesi up by the defendant, and a distress put in
upon her thereupon, with the view of preventing her front pro-
secutieg this action. He should prove,that the defendant had
attempted to bribe an attorney's clerk, to give tik a written agree-
ment between the partiett.
Isabella Staniforth,slaughter of the plaintiff; an elegant and
'interesting. youg woman, about twenty; witness at 'fins re-'
sicked at Demerara.; the defendar.t sent to England fbr wit.
ness, and told. her her father, t'aptain 1114Pherson, was dead,
and they all, as well as defendant, went- into mourning',. tie-'
fendant said that he must purchase the hawse in Stepney.
green, as for himself, lot the 500/. which' he seCtietel to pur-
Chase it, should make it subject to his (Captain ..;%IThersion'sy
debts; this- was after he said witness's father was'tlead ; (''apt
Lovie came to her mother's, and told witness he was going to
arrest hir mother; her mother end she did not owe hint arY
money, and he could not arrest her ; the'plaintlff desired ti e
witness to get him out of the house, and alai would shut the
door ; witness got him out, and her mother shut the dooCiipou
,witneesi and defendant, who were both out higether ; defend.
itrit then hegged her to let him in again, upon which Captain
Lovie seized her mother by the hand, and said, “-1tyei....41,
have got you now ; ' and, continued the witness, Capt.! Lurie
'used my mother in the most Shlttrieftd‘ way.
-Mr. G u•wwe, ,—Thilwas coattail ip.
I)efendant then calle to the neuters to jump over the garden
wall, which they ilitl ellr.',Lovie then seized myliiother arud
threw her down opal; the eofiii.and held'her tiliwn with both his
hands— 4A latleo ; the, officer then arteited her mother ; an
agretraeot teas drawn
.up, andher mother slimed it without
kaawipriehat the was signing; wittiest Was nut therm married,
hut seas trial tied 4 few weeks after; Captain,lrnie said— So.
Mixes I hear you are vine. to get the soot of Me and your *no::
ther." Defendant then told the witness that he intended to
marry her mother, :.nd would, as her father, witness. a