The Sun.
London, England, 1824-11-27 00:00:00

1:01-AL HARBOUR. OF itAmm.,lll: OFFICE.

Lont!on, Nut. RG, 18i4.
N consequence of the TOWS of RAMS-.
-11- GATE hating been recently LIGHTED h! GAS, 4(0
that Ships going for the Harbour in the Night Time found a
difficulty in distinguishing the Pier Light, .

Notice it hereby given, that froni,avti sifttr the loth of Dr.
cenilier next, the PIER LIGHT will be' 'exhibited through a
clear and strung shade of RED COLOUR.
By Order of the Board of Director!,
JOTIN KIRKPATRICK, Svc..

chi, Day was published,
In Two Volumes, royal lepto., with, a NO! Set of Platei,
price 11. as.. in boards, corrected to the tiresent Title; Live
considerably enlarged. of
11)E1i1iE'1"1"S BARON ET A.V, of ENG.
LAND. • •
Printed for C. and J. 11.144figton; altnattell ; J. and A
Arch ; L•inronan and Co.; J. Catlell; I. :did W. T. Clarke;
J. Richardson ;J. Boolter; J. Booth ; S. lingster Hatchard
and Sun ; Baldwin and Co. ; J. Harding; Butting and Co. ;
Hamilton and Co.; Rodwell and Martin; Kingsbury anti Co.;
G.. 11, Whittaker ; W. Mason: Lloyd andi:Stin ; T. and W.
Boone,. and IL Saunders.
A New Edition (the greatest part ie.:Written), of DE-
nitErrs PEERAGE of the United Kingdom, is in the
Press, •and will shortly be published.

UNIFORM WITH THE WORKS, jIN THE TWO
SIZES.
This Day were ; published
_ .

New Editions, in 1 vol. Bvo. and in 2 vols. foolscap, price Lk.
boards, .
CONVERSATIONS of LORD BYRON.
Detailing the principal occurrenccs.of Isis Private Life,
his Opinions on Society, Manners, Literature. and Literary
Men. Being the substance of a Journal kept during a Resi-
dence with his LJrdship at Pisa, in the years 1821 and 1822.
BS' THOMAS MEM IN, Esq.
Of the 21th Light DragoonS. • •
Printed for Henry Colburn, 8, New Burlington-street.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CIIANCERV, Nov. 2G.

EXPARTE ROLLAND AND OTHERS, IN .THE MATTER OF

AfARSII, sTitaerv. AND OItADA3I, BANKIiVPTS, AND OF

11EN1Y PA UNT LEROY, RANIER Err. • .
Mr. Hitatn said, that a commission of bankruptcy had is-
sued against the three parties that mentioned. end a separate
commission against Henry Fiontleroy. In the beginning of
-October, Mr. Seymour, a creditor, took oat a commission
against the four. No assignees had'acen appointed ; nothing
had been done in the commission, witch inr7atirt was perfectly
Useless. The attirignecs - under, the commission against three
all the costs,
itionipii:elysion might be
prrtapyeert,dathie, reanfoaret,hatltiahtt;
including this application.
should be
Mr, GLYNN appeared on behalf of a creditor, to request
that this application might stand over.
Mr. EAU) reek a formal objection to the interference of
any one creditor with this application. If one creditor had this
right, why not MI ? Why not the 1,50 t) or more creditors
Who were likely to claim under the commission? •
• .The Loop ('itAwcpr LOR said, that the objection came a
little too quick upon him, as he really did not know what the
Counsel were about.
Mr. Su A DWELL, on the part of the tutaigi?Pes against Henry
.FisiliftleroY, had no objection to the-app*aulal.
Mr. IlEaLii had been as much in the dark as the Lord
Chancelkn, for mita this teito,e he Intd,orskw,4tel that Mr
Shadviell. appeared to oppose the application. The assignees,
however, fur Ili 110 m hp Appeared, rayed-for the superseding
31r. Seymour's commission, or, in the alternative, that the
p.roceedings might be stayed and deposited in the office of his
Lorilship'a Secretary for Uunkrnpts.
The Lonniiit e T.Oll said, there could be no difficulty
in this case, and the application of Mr. Glynn was of flu use.—
A commission bad issued against three of these partners, and,
at first, it did not occur to him what was•to he done with time
fourth. • lint 113 was then informed that an Act of Parliament
'had lately passed which enabled creditors to take out a coma
mission against some of many partners,
without barring them
from the right of taking out a second convitission against. the
I.m:titling parties, if need should be. This was tie very case
before 'him, and the Act of Parliament enabled the two com-
missions to work as if they were a joint commission against the
whole of the partners. There was no necessity, theirethre, for
the third commission. At the same time it might be •preina-
tore to supersede it, because defects might be discovered in one
Or both of the first commissions, which would leave this com-
mission of Mr. Seymour as die only valid one. The proper
way would be to render this commission inoperative for the
present, by staying the proceedings, and depositing them in the
Secretary's office, without prejudice to the right of any creditor
to present B petition
Order.—Commission to be stayed, and the proceedings depo-
sited with the Secretary of Bankrupts.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov. 26.
Tim KING T. TUE DULL DOCK COMPANY.

This was an appeal against a rate tbr the relief of the poor of
!lull, on the ground that persons liable tube rated were omitted:
These persons were of three classes: first, individuals having
property in !lull, but not personally resident within its limits;
second, the owners of ships registered in the port; and third,
the landlords of houses, whose tenants were too poor to pay
the rates.

The Cot'wr now gave judgment, that the two first classes
ought to be included by virtue of a local statute ; and that the
third class were rightly omitted according to the principles of
the common law. They therefore ordered the rate to be amend-
eel according to their decision.