The Sun.
London, England, 1841-10-25 00:00:00

MOR

MIND SUN. „a

„
)
LI MARY 0

AND
10 tibltt Optntof•

" Who runs may read:'

FOREIGN. b.cjag •
Christina Munoz has thought proper to deny "-
'at 'esti
made the statement with respect to the Span.-- iseeer•
gents, attributed to her by the Spanish AenbAs'-osty
The. Court organ, the Debuts, says—" We are,e3Pfetsria
authorised to declare that the words attributed to
_4(g.
Christina, in the despatch which the Spanish etaahass'slie
forwarded to General Alcala, have already been been
disavowed by the Queen, and that this disavowal, liscre„,
addressed to M. Olozaga himself eras her MajestYs_
intaray
tart'."—
aNs wof i t Oml cod' to
substance was quite correct. Christina takes bed against
"words," not to their generalpurport. Weighed 2g
de, eve
aoyz'abgea,sthraept
ntlrtte,rebntwaesalirgeht jolt:lent a
the statement of an Ambassador officially rsae- ;lob A
Louis Philippe must hold the contradiction or 5
woman as Christina Munoz as dust in the balance'
The Debats does not attempt to conceal its di"rPrPeet'iou
ment at the failure of the Madame Munoz ins he the
in Spain. It says, " Espartero reigns in Spain eVC is
Government de facto of that unfortunate countrY. „nees
acknowledged by France, we have received bie tire
sador, and he is about to receive ours. jest ion
fete
and France all is regular, and the law of natic't/eiti et
bids the French Ministry to commit any set s
roc rit,
openly or secretly; against the Spanish Go
e,
But the Press has a right to express its opinioreis_os
it pleased us to avow our good wishes for the stl‘v.rieies
the insurrection in Navarre, we should not ask n',oo,ets
sion of any party. If we, ike our Government, riitiesl
faithful to Espartero's alliance, it is through Pnd eat,
motives ; but our affection, our preferences, a?eeilee,
principles, are not there. We submit to this a i',4r ete
but we do not love it. We would have wished od b•
happiness of Spain, that the Queen had experieli
same sympathy from the men whom she I°aci iPS
benefits, and who betrayed her. But this trea%se
succeeded, and now constitutes the Spanish Gove!'"ee,s:s
The interest of our country obliges us to live les
with this Government, and we obey. We obey, but .1
whose heart is not in accord with his interest. We eelfeTsese-
Spain herself, who loved Christina, and who obeYs-'Veho
tero."—This is at least straightforward. The e Ise
French would upset the Spanish Government.
e`„,
could but yields to the necessity of acknowledgi;tb: tee
The language of the Debats is a transcript of
thoughts of the King. SP 1°
Several telegraphic despatches with news from
will be found in another part of The Sun. T":01-e.
substance of them here would but be to repeat th , es.
private letter of Thursday afternoon, from Fallen iA
tinctly states, " you„, may regard the insurreme
Spain as at an end." God grant it, say W.
PUBLIC OPINION. • 0
The _Morning Chronicle makes the following Pl
to some remarks made by Lord Stanley in o°ool
with the Corn-laws, in his hustings speech at leT.'cei,
—" There are mistakes of a venial nature I'l ie
public speaker may inadvertently commit'
titir allowance ought to be made. Of such natursess
for . est
not the Tamboff affair of Lord btanley. The
of his Lordship's speech at Lancaster is absolu felt'be et
to ef
graceful to the nation which suffers such a non ,ets
the head -of one of-the most important depart- Ise
Government. We deem it our duty to ring insult
boff case in his ears, to punish him for the we
offered to his countrymen, and the disgrace witvre $2;
he has covered England in. the eyes of eve:
Lord Stanley, from the position he occuPieseeed
to know something of the agricultural prod
.17/
which can be obtained on a given extent °flew, ter
aed of the )proportion of such, produce ay° /11‘
exportation, after supporting its population• for
pardonably disgraceful in a Secretary of •StA
6ttems ,eetA"
British Colonies to repeat and argue frog' heu-t
be
which no British mechanic could utter wit tor) ine
hooted 'doyen by his associates. The gossiping sop,'
,hp'-
Sir Edward Baines, that he had been told that iti •"';‘,
quarters of grain had been-produced in one
.y CI do.--
Government of Tamboff was bad enough 111 hoe.. ~-110
science. But 'Baron Munchausen' could 110t,tritts'"
proved upen Sir Edward as Lord Stanle ds rse
by nom eans a solitary instance of Lord y Stane'
version of facts, in order to suit party PurP°lthe
one of the rashest and most reckless statesmen - to
exhibiin in this respect it striking contrestwee
leader,t Sir Robert Peele--a sly, cool, ca tious diPbe -11
of the red-tape school. will not' we susc!'rotect,
ere the latter will find cause deeply to rue Pis t)
with Lord Stanley. bibel at'
The Times, reverting to the question °I • ote ;
elections, says ee-" We are not disposes t° e" re
time, or that of our readers, in discussing at -4,43 "ey:,4
length the hotly contested question, whethr, is; et't'oi
servatives, the Whigs, or the extreme Rad, is;
gen' tdi
guilty of the mOse extensive bribery at the fete be 6 al/
election. If, indeed, we were obliged he bet 'Tees ia
a race, we would back the Whigs. Other 13?,retieei the; jos
state were fighting for opinions, either of po"1,1; eer, u pf
or of moral principle ; but the Whigs lout;:,sess°, bf
life. We admit that a party having quiet FM,' or ;11
power, is generally more prone to negligence 21ni6 ,f
than a party seeking to obtain it ; but ed'euei- te
is in peril of being displaced—when the imtne—;,:rs,
and terror of expulsion are upon all their reta'-teao ';
isno more of tendency to napping or noddiqtu...o
house whose inhabitants are roused at naidnig"„t felt et
The exertion increases with the danger, out
its crutches, and even rheumatism wales, ereiecti•
en,
was the situation of the Whigs at the last Laois ele
That the Whigs bribed during the late re'-de ,ir
have not the slightest doubt, for they are I,l.es* tms;,e.
of it ; but it is the height of effrontery to eonrweo.ilef,
doings in this respect with those of the Vrie„.'inee
the last fifty years and upwards—indeed, ever,;
have been a dominant party in the State--ba ip
staunch, unhesitating advocates of bribery au
been t 1
tion in their worst form. Not only have tbeY pee
infamously distinguished; but they have even iegitin3 It
best to reduce bribery to a system—in fact, t° anee
it, as far as they could do so, by their eountell briet .110,
example. -No man ever mentions the word II Ter),kie
without instantly associating it in thought -Witte eoto,loe
' The Advertiser says—" We are at a 10s
the immense value of More Church' to A sio, •
1.41,11:, A
pulation, whose cry is for bread, unless ;it wits s-tt,jet.
there is no more hope for their bodiesetbe,trGevertle- tiO
be made, in future, the exclusive care ot u*fe
Having starved them first, it is perhaps tuf butel'eel,
monopolists to help their victims to Heave",:etsblo,-,1,,,,1t
not believe that the Church as by law `,g thJto
will give them any better qualification for POs„ ste of
the • narrow gate,' than by reducing them t" to
poverty, and thus relieving them from 0104 0,11 .00
meeting with such difficulties as the riee,ll e exteeeieas
encounter on their road to Heaven. 11 reP•010
of the Church is not the extension ° the fee of
consolation,' but consists chiefly ,in giving to„,e,
the luxury of paying parsons, with tbeo;"seiseti% for
being sent to sleep by the dullness of their 5 or
object in building more Churches is to pNviecesil t,t•
the spiritual, much less for the' corporeal °yams ° 00.
the poor—but to supply the temporal If Ariet°6 cl
younger sons and distant connections 0,,, is 11.,
families."—The clamour for " More Cbtlre"he 1000,00
mour whose meaning will deceive none but t
norant or the very credulous. It does nc'tioi ; for
religion—more charity—more true
more funds for the Parsons—more ternrrh3v,
the Establishment !Itis a clamour di lint trio it
to suit its own interested purposes. et doe
cede el.i'
'from the community at large—it is nOt resist
them. They take not. the -slightest interes
timer, which begins and ends with, and the
confined ties Mother Church herself. eierld!t as
In reference to • Lord Alvanley's late P'vvoict to
Herald has the following reniarks:d by " Is the St.!, 014
abandonment of Protestantisniin eeitt.'ef
adopt Lord'Alvanley's project ; it weuld 'once Do es
CJ
that good might springstherefrom. *The eet iu Sti4 /9
Christi
vOOll6Ol
State being Protestant; it imist be Prcitesttotesten,,
essential details. The active ptinciple-of thfeoper.,l
in a temporal view, is antagonistiC toVore.rrfesvf,iief
io Prot-eouttit, 11Peatten, it bclitves the dectri thiS Y,erS,t4r,
to be soul-des:ructive ; in all its formula its eepaoe
prominently developed. Protestantism, in they' PO/ .4e
from the leoinish Church, has indeed n° reieeiple
tion, and unless it adheres to this great P" estP"'
time the Reformation was accomplished in Y. woe" jots
ith sedo
testant State cannot re-connect itself w- eje testi-
!eboetenet,hteor uthseanAirteihsb.,i,s,hop Laud's inrciorA"ario.,,.o?sliiii:
The Post contains the following renl be
the sentiments which we perceive to bile they leo to,
Radical politicians, iv wold eppear t tny''enlities
the populace as made fortheir political cf,utiiefr veto o°l'
to be kept under, or inflamed, as mete' snit:, leatteeeel 00,
views. They tell us that the Tories sea
tote
tor 433
the folly of which ther were guilty 1010_ toto • 1,
the Liberal' Administration which stout. eiocr 1•
,r?,
(win' t
aristocracy and the popular hatred. Tlan helelri 11'
seems, are indebted for their safety', -.her7es' eeeseen
years, to the circumstance of the 'Al,'
_Gove'-oilt;
eP
it was not their interest to kick is 'oeerthr;
office. As they hail possession of tae. distor_o
yep
of which the natural tendency is t etsee
government, and, therefore, the. p0P.,..i,; so it, 3
down. A. truly 'virtuous policy, e'" „eel
Curious indeed -es the candour evbieu eigho ineteere'e
It is the Tories, not the Whig-Radicalse
_wel 4 tlt
the populace "as made for their political jos OP ties
TorY od oil twit
for it was ever the favourite notion of
notion it has never ceased to act• f" Liles
p"jor cyr
it will now.change its nature and enlarg /,:th otee
people were nothing—itself every thinsge ;vain°
have no difficulty in believing that ti $l,l
tc.,o St
Tie
change his skin, and the leopard his •r
Ove
absurdity, no matter how glaring. efi, tee t epobt
Speaking of the state of affairs in Canals' to to ace sios
Herald says : —"lf left to themselves,
tha"re is tido lifsehti
their own convictions of sound 13°.lile.k'weries, °nettled es
that the questions now agitating in
_nicabll tiop.e:,,
ing English interests, would soon beee jitit it
_vie
the Governments of the two countries. „ice preeeee
if nut 1:1-„, r 1,7, es
some of the border States, is almost%
cetera' vtchis
trolable by the President and the , _,oyeo ;eatils
that the spirit of independence, so called, v'" nite, fneil"
The history of the M'Leod case cleave' v,e„,s ince: eye! _
• thout the cb
the fact. Hence it is that tvi ~,t, fin ee
ib
to War on the part of either Government' ;eel° vet
independence without principle .nod • re
encipie or
the vOO-
- too many of the election,Republicanse, 1,
may be forced upon us by the headstr etion't
• re-
On the question
,of liriberY at :--" they r
Briton makes the following remark •
eve ; _ees _
tend to lament the abuse, but they
rejee hand,t` sr pr:fr
complain, but then they seek not' to iln_Pf“-seri
ry
remedy. The Reformers, on the viler et
in their deiire to stop the evil, and to icej'ep,
ticable improvement that may at;,onee
tually root out, the whole system.