The Sun.
London, England, 1812-05-02 00:00:00

FRIDAY, MAY I.

The Irish Appeal Cause, Giffird v. Hort, Barts.
being taken into final consideration, their Lordships
came to a Resolution, as their judgment upon the
case, on the motion of Lord REDSSDALE, tended
partly to reverse the Decrees of the „Trish Exche-
quer, and partly to remit it, with diredions for ul-
terior proceeding on the part of that Court.
Their Lordships then "adjourned for some time,
during.pleasure 5 and at about five o'clock the House
resumed.

The Bills upon the table were forwarded in their
respeettve stages. Among these, the Irish Public
Accounts Audit, and the Irish Military Accounts
Audit Bills, were read a third time and and passed.
Mr. LUSHINOTON brought up a message from the
Commons, requesting a copy of the 4th
report of
their Lordships Committee upon the affairs of the
East India Company.
The, lush Partnership Regulation Bill was brought
up by the same Gentleman and read a first time.—
Several private and local bills were presented by Lord
Templetown, Mr. Dundas, Mr. Kenrick, and other
Members.

The Place and Pension Duty Bill passed through
a Committee of the whole House, and was reported
without amendment.
It was ordered, on the motion of the Earl of
LAIWBRDAL6, that there be laid before the House
an account of the number of notes ii.sued by the
Bank of England, from its first establishment in
1694, to the year 1797, distinguishing the amount
of each month, &c.

CHARGE MADE BY THE AMERICAN GOVERN-

MENT.

Lord HOLLAND, pursuant to what he stated on a
former evening, called the attention of their Lord-
ships' again to this subject. He said, he confessed
it was with some surprise, and with still more re-
gret, that he learnt it was the intention of Ministers
to resist his proposed motion for what he deemed
indispensably necessary information for the satisfac-
tion of the House and the country. There were do-
cuments conneEted with the transaElion alluded to,
the authenticity of 'which the Noble Earl did not
seem to contradid. He thOught it best to leave
explanation, in'the first instance, to Ministers them-
selves. The Noble Secretary did not ,state it was
his intention to bring forward any papers on the oc-
casion. When he first notified his intention to
more for these documents, he entertained a firm
convithon, that the Noble Secretary was not inclined
to resist such 'a procedure. As another important
topic was about to come under their. Lordships con-
sideration this evening, he should not now press his
intended motion, blithe should bring it forward on
Tuesday next ; and he would move that the Lords
be summoned on the occasioo. Wnat he- proposed
then io tuove for was, for copies of all communica-
tions made by Sir James Craig, to his Majesty's Se-
en tary of State, respecting the employment of Mr.
Henry on a secret Mission to the United. States of
Ain rica. Also for a copy of the correspondence
with Gen. Prevost on the subje& of the compensar
tion claimed by Capt. Hentli-; and also for a Fopy of
the instructions sent by the Secretary of Slate to Sir
Jai-nei.C:aig,.respeaing the Ctrlployment of a pei-son
to prOcure information respetting the United States
of America.

The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, that whenever the,
Noble Baron should bring forward his motion, he
should be perleally ready to state the grounds on
which he deemed it his duty to oppose the produc-
tion of those documents, aim to state such circum-
stances of the transadion as to induce him to form
such a conclusion. He Cads ready to meet the Noble
Baron on the subjed on any day ; to that specified
he had no objeCtion, as there vas no intention of
opposing the intended motion, of referring the Pe-
titipu9 of the Manuta&nrers to a Committee of the
whole House.
ORDERS IN COUNCIL.

The Earl of LAUDERDALE, in reference to what
the Noble Secretary of State had just intimated,
said it would be desirable to know when it was
meant the House should go into the Committee,
what time Would be set aside for those proceedings ?
Many of the petitioners came from different parts of
the country ; they must be prepared against the
time. They had other business to attend to, rind it
would highly inconvenience them to experience un-
necessary delays.

The Jiarl of: LIVERPOOL said, that with regard to
the course of proceeding, every proper, attention
should be paid to the pcpional accommodation of the
individuals alluded to.—The inquiry should go on
as long as their Lordships should think proper, and-
he thought a set number of days should be given up
for the purpose. He had no objection to com-
mencing the inquiry on an early day, and that Thurs-
day next would not be an improper time for the
commencement.