The Sun.
London, England, 1847-05-22 00:00:00

LI.A.V >711.12.11.E TS

SMITIIFIELI).--Aleaoow Hay, 2/ 103 to 31 14s ; Clover ditto.
3! 104 ti 4,15 s; and raw, 14 lOs to 11 14s per load. Supply
gno.l, and trade very dull.
Custm,,LAND.—Aleatlow hay, 21 12s to 31 16s; Clover
ditto, 31 tOs to 4/ 14s; and Straw, 1/ lls toll 15s per load.
A lull average supply, ai,d a sluggish demand.
11''iirracHart:L.—Meadow Hay, 2/ 10s to 31 14s; Clover
ditto, 31 lOs to 41155; and Straw, 11. lOs to 1114 s per 'oat
Trade dull, at barely late rates.

REPORTED DEATH OF MR.
O'CONNELL.

The .211oniteur Parisien of this night (Thursday,
contains the following :
A letter from Nice gives the death of Mr. O'Con.
nell on his arrival at Genoa.

"On ecrit de Nice que O'Connell est snort en
arrivant a Genes."

Although this important statement bears no date,
yet it must be observed that it is communicated
through the organ of the French Government, who
received it probably by telegraphic dispatch, as it is
worded in the form usually adopted when giving such
communications to the public.

(From the Atlas.)
SECOND EDITION.—We are in receipt of a private
letter this morning from Florence, dated May 13th,
by which we are enabled to set at rest the anxiety of
Mr. O'Connell's friends respecting the above report.
It gives us pleasure to state that Mr. O'Connell was
then on his way to Rome, and apparently recovered
from the attack which seized him at Genoa. The
writer says—. '
" Mr. O'Connell and his con, Mr. D. O'Connell, june
with the Rev. Dr. Miley and his private physician,
arrived at Leghorn, from whence they proceed byhav the
steamer to Civita Vecchio. and Rome, where he is to
remain a short time; after which he comes to Florence
to pass the summer months at a villa."

ALARMING FIRE NEAR THE POST-OFFICE.—Last
night, shortly after 11 o'clock, a fire that caused consi-
derable alarm broke out upon the premises belonging to
Mr. Falshaw, , fancy box manufacturer, situate at No. 8,
tainlane, St. Martin's-le-Grand. The flames origi-
natedi ntigom some unknown cause in the front shop, and
before being perceived they bad obtained the complete
possession
of the whole of the stock therein. Whilst
S
the firemen were engaged in extinguiNhing the flames, a
report was raised that an elderly temsle was at the top
of the house. The escape of trie .yal Society for Pro-
tection of Life from Fire was immediately raised in
front of the building, and the conductor ascended, and rushed through the smoke, and inspected overy room
not cn fire, but .' ithOtitfi an) one, and it after-
turned out that . h- wire from home when the
outbreak uccurted. :!nd O. great ex.:rtions the fire
was contioed to the lower portion of the premises, but
before it was extinguislnd nearly the whole of the stock
in tn.& was destroyed. It could not be ascertained
whether or not the property was insured. shortly
het' re Vie •thove outbreak a fire broke out at 13, Water-
l" Chel:ea-eotna:on, occupied by Mrs. Mary
A; .f ed. a lau-dress. ThE, loss will be covered by all
in-
eurance in the County-vffice. •

.

CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)
The Lord Chancellor sat at Westrninsttr to-day, it
being the first day of Trinity Term. His Lordship sat
at ten o'clock, in consequence of the usual breakfast to
the Judges, Masters in Chancery, and'Queen's Counsel,
having been dispensed with. The formality of this
breakfast on the first day of each term has existed forcen-
turies, and Lord Lyndhurst, the late Lord Chancellor,
was the first to put an end to it as far as it respected
Hilary and Trinity Terms. The present L.rd Chan-
cellor thinking, as we understand, the ceremonial a great
waste of the public time, and tollowing in the wake of
his predecessor, has discontinued the practice for the.
two other remaining terms, Michaelmas and Easter.'
His Lordship was occupied the whole morning with ap-
peal motions, but no case of intt rest came before, the
Court.

VICE-CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY')t
This hying the first day of Trinity term
otheeloek ,
a nd Vice-Chancellortxuce proceeded
codfhis Lion?_.ll
to England
tak
BRETT V. MASSEY AND THE ELECTRIC TELE"
COMPANY.
e motions.took his seat at:..:
-
Mr. Stewart, with Mr. Webster, were for M. Briarett;h
;
Mr. Rolt, with Mr. Metcalfe, for Mr. Hassey: and "„
Bethel!, with Mr. Heathfidd, for the Electric TelegraY
Company. a Lb°.
This was an application to restrain Massey an, ob.,
Electric Tel. graph Company from pirating a Ilatenn", of
twined by Brett to simplify and improve the sisti the
printing by means of electricity. As stated ,Y ,he,
i
Learned Counsel, it appeared that Mr. Brett, ll
month of December last, had turned his attention toote!
subject of electric fluids with the view of inventines no°
means to prevent the gradual decrease of
Power is
In the
of the
batteries occasioned by the imperfect construction
metallic troughs. He did discover a mode of remedying
the evil, and had so fur improved his invention by the
et4d of January, that on the 11th of February, 1847, be
was induced to take out letters patent. It appeared',
however, that Mr. Massey had, in the month of January,
called at the office of the Electric Telegraph Companyr
and exhibited to them a" model trough " ot a similar cha-
racier with that afterwards patented by Mr. Brett.
The company at once saw the utility of the invention,'
and entered into terms with Mr. Massey. A. formal
agreement was concldded between them, dated the 25th
of January, and Mr. Massey afterwards proceeded fur-
ther, for on the 16th of February he (claiming to be en•
titled to the credit of this invention) went—and instead
of apply ing for letters patent—he went and registered
the invention. •The Learned Counsel, under these dr-,
cuinstances, contended that as the patent was granted ta
Mr. Brett, on, the 11th of February, and Mr. Massey bad
only registered his alleged inventian on the 16th, the
priority of date sufficiently proved to whom the merit ,
the invention belonged. .I.le maintained, therefore, that
under these circumstances his Honour should grant the
injunction.
Mr. BOLT and Mr. METCALFE were heard against the
application. .
His floNoun granted the injunction prayed for.
(Before Vice-Chancellor Sir KNIGHT Baum)
This being the first day of Trinity Term, his Honour
sat at Westminster.
The Court took motions during the early part of its
sitting, and then proceeded to hear arguments in a cause
already part heard, but which possessed no interest ex.
cept for the parties immediately concerned.
(Before Vice-Chancellor WIGRAM.)

BROOKS V. PORTER.
This was a suit by vendors against purchasers
and the Plaintiff gave
the defendant might pay his money into Court, whico;
that
the
he did, and a sum of SOU was accepted as a compromise
instead of the former sum The ennveLah,ce
lawtatswr ofe.
pared and approved of, but it now appe ed
noticothf
specific performance,
might be ordered to execute
The defendants
Cthoeuvrtenncleowrs
wre.afsutsetdhatto
tehxeeyeute. The application to the.
the' conveyance within a limited time. _
ohuatdtfihleeidr aanutahtlayv.it, that the suit was commenced with
solicitor ltr . B ToGrShaispperiaernetsd
hadfor the
made de defendants. dan
arrangementt s.
wai beneficial to himself, and had completely thrown
over their interests. Thu suit was commenced without
tt,h:Hr•ieriis) kiiiitioouaNp,l,,eruld:Rhgtehe.edfiicir.Bsoeterytt:e. executing this conveyance his
clients would be assigning over a very considerable pro-
ma
stand
doe
rt
over
of
ferminoru Master
n until
peity without any proper satisfaction. ile would suggest.
to I- k: a Honour
eadyy shouldatonhfeeere.
term,cfears thee
ato case
nsut
Friday next.
bneeixntg.
motions were disposed uf, which contained nothing of
public interest.
QUEE

N'S BENCI-I.—(THIS DAY•)
Their Lordships(Stoitotkintghseilrn sßeaaltiscuthis morning abort',
alter ten o'clock.
THOMAS V. FREDERICKS.—DAMAGE Br GAME.
In this case the defendant had obtained a rule in arrest
of judgment, and a rule calling upon the defendant to
show cause why the verdict which he had obtained should
not be set aside, and a new trial granted on the ground
of informality.
Mr. Peacock and Mr. Chilton, Q.C., appeared in s.er.
port of the verdict of the jury, and against the aPPlica
tion of the defendant.
The Counsel simply confined their arguments to the
arrest of judgment.
It appeared that the plaintiff bad leased a
house and land, in Carmarthen, to the defendant for tw-
omanortwo years, for the purpose of shooting over it.
was stocked with game, and in the agreement
between the parties, it was arranged 'that in
the event of the game doing any damage
to the property of the farms, over which the
right of shooting was let to the defendant, the amount
should be determined by two " indifferent " persons,.
one to be appointed by the plaintiff, and the other by
drawn
nw land
up
the defendant. Damage to the amount of 1601. 12s. was
done during the first year of bis tenancy, and 183/. 7s.
during the second. This amount was awarded by a Mr.
Moody, the plaintiff's arbritator, the defendant not
having appointed one on his behalf within ten days after
having received notice from the plaintiff to do so. The.
first objection raised by the defendant was, that the
agreement was not under seal.
Lord DENMAN said it was merely a license to sport,
and did not require to be under seal. The Court Of
Exchequer had so decided, and a case was tried before
him at Kingston, in which an objection was taken to the
validity of such an agreement, because it was not under

seal;but he overruled it at nisi prius.
Mr. PEACOCK
said the second objection raised by the
defendant was, that not having thought proper to ap-
point an arbitrator, the plaintiff had no right to go on
without him; but he (Mr. Peacock) held that the de-
fendant was bound to choose an arbitrator within the
specified time, and to notify the same to the plaintiff,
and c.t at if he did not do so, that the plaintiff could pro-
ceed to natjte his estimate of the damage sustained, and
he proceeded Accordingly, and obtained a verdict for the
amount claimed.
Mr. CHILTON followed on the same side.
Mr. BUTT appeared in support of the arrest of
judgment, and contended that there was not sufficient
statement in the declaration to show that the defendant
had not appointed an arbitrator. The defendant might
have appointed a person to make a valuation on his part,
and if ho did, there was no necessity for him to give
notice to the plaintiff; it was quite sufficient for a per
son to produce his arbitrator at the time he was required.
Mr. GRAY followed on the same side.
Lord DENmAti considered that judgment ought not to
be arrested. It was true there were grounds of de-
murrer, but they were very special grounds indeed.
When two parties agreed to appoint arbi rators, be
thought it was incumbent upon them to exchange notices
to that effect. Haring the arbitrator's name on a piece
of paper, or in one's mind, subject to be altered at 41
times, was no nomination at all. The Court could not,
therefore, c• nsPut to arr,.t the judgment.
Rule discharged accordingly.
The rule which Ilact been uytained for a new trill ne?t
came on for argument.
Mr. CILIUM said the rule bad been obtained Ort

ROLLS' COURT.—(THIS DAY))
This being the first day of term, his Lordship sat this
morning. at tf n o'clock, at Westminster.
FOTHEhINGTON V. THE SOUTHAMPTON AND DORCHESTER
RAILWAY COMPANY.
This was a motion to restrain the defendants fro,n;
erecting a station at a place called King. Johns airor
near Southampton. It appeared that the piaintin, -rims
Hamilton Fotherington, a portion of whose estate.
traversi d by the works of the defendants,
against their Bill, but had withdrawn that oppositioll
the faith of an agreement that had been entered into„
between his solicitor and the company, by whic4 it vinia`
stipulated that the railway should pass the ext,rege
southern boundary of Mr. Fotherington's estate, anc tu
a screen or fence should be erected, which w„nott
ld
entirely exclude the railway from view at .-P.ine
Bridge House, the residence of the plaintiff.‘_
which would prevent the plaintiff having the prosPeet.
from his house obstructed. It was further agreed the:
if any difference should arise in reference to the site of
had petitionead,
the station, or on any other point, it should be decided
by two arbitrators, who were named. The Bill Will
passed through Parliament, the defendants commence('
their works. A difference did arise between the par'
ties, and it was decided by arbitration that on no pert:
Lion of a piece of reserved land, specified by the terme2,_
the arbitrament, should the company erect any
This, however, it was understood, the company
about to violate, being in treaty with the proprietor °f
the ground in question, after tha withdrawal of an in
junctiou which he had obtained at his own instance,
prevent their erecting any works there. Gin
Mr. Tumult, who appeared for the plaintiff, CO
that - his client was clearly entitled to the ililetr
which he required. His case rested upon three grth"- the
the very terms of the company's Bill, which limited t e
site of the proposed station of the company le s°°.
place "at or near Bletchington-terrace, South a/upto.th
the terms of the agreement, and the award of the ureP,lre.
The company could not erect the station at the PT,„
where they proposed to do so, without violating Ai,
terms of the Act of Parliament, it being a considers.
distance from the place specified. But even if the tertft;
of the Act were not considered conclusive as to 0
validity of his client's claim, there could be no doubt_nd
to the terms of the agreement, and Lord Cottenhani hit
decided that a company could not violate an agreement
by virtue of their Act. By the terms of that agreewe of
they had bound themselves to abide by the decisionfer.
arbitrators, who decided that upon no pretext whet; be.
should any portion of the reserved piece of growls,
built upon by the company.
Mr. BAGSHAWE followed on the same side. so:
Mr. BEALY said that he would rest his clients cam
upon the evidence adduced by the plaintiff.
Ili§ LORDSHIP said that he thought it would be
dati
gerous to rely upon such evidence, and it was ultimatcye
arranged that the case should stand over till Friday'
28th instant.

~~

POs

was
Cie°
had
Ike%
lient
Ivor
earl
%tot
zoo

ground that rabbits were not game, and at the trial his
k Learned Friend (Mr. Williams, now Mr. Justice Wil-
• limns) produced an illustration of a Brobdignagian rabbit
eating the ears of ripe corn.—(Laughter.) A thousand
couple of rabbits were killed by the defendant in
the first year, during which year it was alleged that
damage had been done, by " rabbits and game, to the
amount of 601, and in the second to the value of 451.
The principal damage was done by the rabbits, and he
(Mr. Chilton) contended that they were game.
Mr. BUTT said they were not game by the 1 and 2 of
VM.32, C. sec. 2. As they were not game, the
damages should be considerably reduced, and therefore
a new trial should take place.
Lord DENMAN said the Court would consider the
whole matter.
BOYD V. ROYAL EXCHANGE ASSURANCE COMPANY.
This part-heard case is appointed to be resumed on
Itonday, the second day of term.

BAIL COURT.—(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco, before Mr. Justice WIGHTMAN).
The Court met at ten o'clock, but no business of im-
portance was transacted ; and after sitting for a few
Minutes the Court adjourned.

EXCHEQUER,.—(T HIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco.)
This was the first day of Trinity Term. Their Lord-
-BhiPs sat at two o'clock, and in pursuance of a new
arrangement, proceeded with the business pending in
the peremptory paper, from which, however, no case of
141 Interest was taken. Mr. Baron Parke will be the
J..
be at nisi prigs this term.

COMMON PLEAS.—(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco, before the LORD CHIEF JUSTICE.)
This being the first day of term, motions were taken,
fete first of which was
BAINES v. WARD.
Mr. Sergeant BYLES moved for a new trial, on an arrest
(f. judgment in this case, on the ground of misdirection
of the Judge at the trial. It appeared that an action
had been brought upon a case of injury, where damages
. had been given for a default in not properly fencing an
wren close by a public footway. The circumstances
Were these :—A lady, the mother of three children,
/rent to see her friend off by the Great Western Rail •
lteY, and while waiting for the train they both went to
%house in the neighbourhood, for refreshment, and on
aheir way back to the station her companion dropped
" !Duff; she turned to pick it up, and in doing so fell
own
he_ a number of steps which led to the basement of a
"use, and fractured her skull. She died in consequence,
!Ind an actionfor damages had been brought, on which the
PIT gave a verdict for the plaintiff. Mr. Sergeant 133 les
moved for a new trial on the ground that the declaration
has not in compliance with the terms of the Act, which
Lerher andiredthat all the parties interested, up to the grand-
nez grandmother, ought to be stated. In the
user
t place, there had been no evidence to show that
e hadtuts eni been any grant of a public right to pass by
Possibnl
.way and if there were not, no action could
v tr: Justice MAUlsuggestedthe case of " Walker
• linght."
broueb:r. "'rgeatit BYLES said that that was an action
nue"' in a case where the casement or footway was
ter Oyer, an area, and not by it, which materially al-
ol circumstances. Neither could there be any
for—"ith4 the ground of this being an ancient footway,
he,..._`.fteeident occurred in an open place in front of a
*0'4.1: Victoria terrace, situate in a pathway leading
Solelythe Edgeware-road to the Harrow-road, which was
tenant in in consequence of the permission of the
hope .-J• Now, although there was a local Act
unitg a penalty upon parties not fencing any
"tim or open space, yet that did not give
fine ;Int ground of action, for the penalty, which is a
conk ~,ute pounds, would give the remedy ; and. he
the abuse
that if this way were allowed by the tenantry,
i......auuse a
or misfortune arising from the use of it,
ta"tePt). Qed 11.0 responsibility on the tenant in fee of the es-
or mar it was an acknowledged principle, that a rector
ha even, erea, each of whom was at least a tenant for
Yard Z.' no right to yield a hetrih of way over a church.
so thv itilunt the consent of patron and the bishep ;
4 deet there was clearly no liability. There was then
Weren.leeneY in th among which stated that the damages
,49 De divided the several persons who might
nieed:ht!ed to them ; and there had been a special recom-
take reef
bY the jury that the learned judge should
the
reaaFe that the money was properly divided among
geld 11)ients who were infants. There was, therefore,
411(14% defect in the judgment, which entitled the de-
The a new adjudication.
the Be 41E' JUSTICE said, that it was the opinion of
butted neb that sufficient evidence had not been sub-
knot a„...t° the jury to justify the verdict, and the rule
money rdingly be allowed. With respect to the
bela.ue
ssourt had no jurisdiction. but in the event of
tile pot ultimately paid, the plaintiff in the action was
tbs re Y entitled to receive it, and if any injury ensued
Zleitrill.et• would be by an application to a Court of
MrCOWELL V TIPROSE.
u
Hi; y *
this uONES applied for a rule for a new
the def ease. The plaintiff had been charged by
etettetie.
Bb "dant • .
with felony for breaking open a shop and
PeehendeiCiartinles, in consequence of which he was ap-
rod flisehagr4euned in the station-house for one night,
ahon„s"Pence ef the next morning by the magistrate, in
tress, had been eff appearing that the entry into the
The eii; 7c,ted for the purpose of levying a dis-
erdiet foe. `,l-4„,t"T brought an action, and obtained a
tria, I
was
t_ha.,t,
th.eehe ground application for a new
Weer!. venue had been laid in London,
been
ciaog_no evidence had been given that anything bad
Place ,
u there, for the arrest and imprisonment took
*ere
befr dnitiee CRESSWELL said, that as the allegations
%our° the magistrate must have been stated on, the
i.trial.
le Present representation was erroneous.—r e rule
tlaccordingl refused.
There beincrYno other business ready, the Court ad-
dcinrned till Monday.

WORSHIP -STREET. -(THIS DAY.)
txTENSIVE ROBBERY BY TWO BROTHERS. Henry
f 7" Charles Fan-, were this morning brought be-
orßroughton o on the charge
atealing a cash-box,containing gold, bank notes, and
°lBaturitios amounting to upwards of 2301., the . property
.Mr, James Bird, landlord of the Mail Coach Tavern,
--`nAgsland-road.
Salta
last.
rirciZeunt of the robbery appeared in The Sun of
liee_seY were again remanded, in order that certain..
14 '_' ed victuallers, who have been plundered in a stmt-
tuM nner sho 1 have the opportunity
na.,
~
e, u d
''' uci m. of appearing
A tall,TpHo4l‘fulLEl Sk.—*
g(T.omilain,SnaDmeAdYJu./)iu Mann,
Ass char hY Niru.° Henryin Lemon, landlord of the
erge Tavern
bad been for s'ornillpsein4rY.
kastitilt:-- lane,
following
in
whose servicep sherate
Some Unit., with the des
kr, L
dotsett th ereon stated that yesterday afternoon his wife
the Prisoner out. When she returned she was the
c4rryeinir licl"r, and nearly let his child which she
was
carrying Pali
out of her arms. A woman who
.in.s.
raediuki at t.he bar took it from the prisoner, who I
blow
/loner °:l:t."heelzikeetolir by her hair and dealt her a violea.t
d him with interfered, when the pt-i-
-teveral 'Et -'4l with the foulest epithets, struck him
6qUares ~f--"i's, 411 d then proceeded to demolish two
in , ;,' glass, two bottles of gin, broke a tub contain-
Thirdand gall" and a half of bitters, and finally took up a
threatened to stab him.
Afr. jridenee having been corroborated,
Nur d 'tLLANTINE inquired if the woman who had. been
e
gative, air
ne e.
was present, and on. receiving an answer in
Out 4 , eeted her to be informed that she must take
tiaa, h"srrant against the prisoner, whom in the mean-
er -e Bhould fine 255., the amount of the damage done,
4!fillic3tlrt.his imprisonment,
pet:no:A) isoner, who said nothing in her defence, was
to folita, and the Magistrate again.direc.tead Mr. Lemon
tile, is°W uy the case, which. he cson:hidoewreedre most. serious
said to have
b q bringing other witnesses been
, present at the transaction, on the occasion of her
ePearing to answer the warrant next week.

CLERKENWELL.—(THISchaDrgAedYw.ith
11„aaines Cuffe and George Ciriff
-,,aling 40 sovereigns and a Ji.enote, the property of
41)..0°Mas Lloyd.
l'rota the evidence of a numbleurdgoefdwaittnteislesehsuiutsea.pui
eered that the prisoner James lodged
he called his wife.
Piel. Prosecutor, with a r
00.eeproseeutor had inile
hiosd instant, upon his going to
so
nbowx 40 sovereigns and a 51.
thi,3and on Sunday, the
staple3c, he found that two of the screws fastening the
ithad been removed, and the box being still locked,
ttZtsu opened, and then he saw that his moneyb tshvaesr
the • The younger prisoner called to see his ro
ave information
to ~_daY before. The prosecrudtsor
the elder prisoner
ieftinn police. Soon afterw.a
tne lodgings, but being watched closely, he
which
as traced to a house near Drury lane, Was found to be well furnished, and each of
uthe
Prisoners had a good silver watch upon him,
Previously they were known to have been in ratherodgs i
althn_
tressed circumstances.
Ur. ARNOLD, the sitting magistrate, ordered the pri-
;llZ:
rtion u
be remanded until Friday next, in order
that
quiries might be made about the disposal f the
Prosecutor's money.
...,•imm.............m.m0n0
'FIAE , NORTH-WESTERN
to, ON THE LONDON AND
morn Between twelve and one o'clock yesterday
itti when the down luggage train on the Lstoanduoun,
0.. for,h-Western line was near the Willesden station,
and of the him,. trucks discovered to be on fire,
and th_ . . luggage was tiens e train w
effect,
as instantly stopped. Immediate exer-
as thewet.' made to subdue the flames, but without
end,
two first truck Was speedily on fire from end to end,
tllnd before e vehicle could be detached from the train
swD,°,„,,c),t,hers Were also on fire. Other assistance, however,.n
olt"L'y arrived, and by great exertions the destruction
e()CPertY was confined to the three trucks with t
Tit
of pr-o'it', all of which ',sere totally consumed. The amo,u
4 . Perity destroyed has not 3et been ascertained. The
Feident is supposed to have b caused by a red-hot
cinder having been thrown fromeen the engine.
~NENIENT To THE LATE EARL OF YARBOROILIGfHa.
~,,.."-oe committee for superintending the erection 0,.
r.
i7littnaent to the memory of the late Earl of la 'Nigh, consists of Commodore the Marquis of Done-
gal, R ,
ke ~ • ..s., Admiral Sir Graham Hamond, Bart.,
Adair, 44., R.Y.S., John Beardmore, Esq., R.Y.S., Rear-
ilitLil D. Dundas, C 8., M.P., Lord of the Admiralty,
rt.y.s"'e°3•..4•Y•S.; Captain Love, RN., lion. Me"
t,, • •; the uon. A'Court Holmes, M.P. G. H. Ward,
Mounttj" M•, Secretary to the Admiralty, and the Earl of
acydu:•.tecurabe, Commodore of the Royal Western
sevellratiUlebuti Thine' Commodore is not yet determined on, but
Pieces (& land"en of the Isle of Wight have offered
t.._
wa
at for that purpose. The subscriptions
."I.t), t_. present to abouth©
Royal Westeria
& %Qat Club Vahicrthei6,ol. towards it