The Sun.
London, England, 1840-02-29 00:00:00

Mr. John Chapman, Mr. Buller East, M.P., Mr. Charles
Buller, M.P., Mr Aaron Asher Goldsmid, Mr. J. Montefibre,
Mr. J. Cockburn, Mr. J. Hoare, Mr. C. E. Laysrd, Mr.
Newnham, Mr. Brooking, Sir Frederick Hankey, Sir Jah4
Campbell, Mr. C. F. Middleton, and Mr. Montgomery Malin,
had an interview yesterday, with Mr. Labouchere, at the Board
of Trade, respecting a bank for the British possessions in the
Eastern hemisphere.
The Solicitor-General, Sir Alexander Johnston, and Mt.
Vincent, had interviews with the Marquis of Normanby yes.
terday.

LAST THURSDAY'S DIVISION.

PAIRS ON MR. LIDDEI
J. NEWPORT

.f.'SMOTION ON SIR
S PENSION.

AGAINST.
Abercromby, G. R
Acheson, Viscount
Anson, Sir Georg*
Barron, W. H.
Beamish, F. B.
Berkeley, Hun. C.
Bryan, George
Cave, Otway
Cavendish, G. H.
Cayley, E. S.
Chapman, Sir M. L.
Chester,
.Henry
Chichester, J. P. B.
Childers, J. W.
Culquhoun, Sir James
Crawford, W.
Davies. Colonel
D'Eyncourt, C. T.
Donkin, Sir liufane
Duncan, Lord
Edwards, Sir J.
Erie, William
Etwall, It.
Fector, J. 111.
Ferguson, It.
Ferguson, Sir It. C.
Fitz,imon, N.
French, F'.
Gillon, W. D.
Grattan, Henry
(.uost, J.
Heticage. E.
Heron, Sir It.
James, William
.Jephson, Sir C.
Langton, Col. G.
Lister, E.C.
Macnamara, W.
Maher, John
Martin, Thomas B.
Milton, Lord
O'Brien, Cornelius
Phillips, Sir It. P.
Ponsonbv, C.
Power, Jambs
Roche, Sir 1).
Roche, F. It.
S alley, It. A.
Sloe's, Alexander
Talbot, J. H.
Talfourd, T. Noon
Vivian. Major C.
Vivian, John
'Walker, C. A.
Westenra, Hon. H.
White, Samuel
White, Colonel H.
White. Luke
Wilbrahaar, G.

Palmer, George
Parker, Montague
St. Pae.l, Horace
ccistlereugh, Viscount
Rose, Sir George
Meld, Joreph
O'Neil, J.
Burdett, Sir F.
Bagot, Hon. W.
Cartwright, W. L.
Compton, H. C.
Parker, T. A. W.
Buller, Sir J. Y.
Yorke, Hon. E. T.
Trevor, Hon. IL
Dottin, Abel Rout
Hamilton, C. J. B.
Maclean, D
Gordon, Hon. W.
Brownrigg, J. S.
Davenport, J.
Cress. ell, ( resitreci
bushbrook, Colossi
Egerton, Lord F.
Kelbuine, Lord
Jones, Wilson
Fleming, J.
Williams, Robert
Hughes, \V. B.
Lcltoy, I) I'.
Tyrell, Sri J T.
Marton, George
Kerrison, Sir E.
Jenkins, S r IL
Gore, O. W.
Fernald, Robert
Hawker,
Pollen, Sir J. W.
Canning. Sir S.
Hayes, Sir E.
4+ Hord. VISCUtlat
Kirk; Pc.er
Patten, Wilson
Baring, W. B.
Dungannon, Lied
Bateson, Sir A.
( onolly, K
Smedley, IL
Feilden, W.
Houston, George
Godson, It.
Dr.l,
Mackenzie; W. F
Campbell, Sir H. P.
Harcourt. 0. S.
Cole, Hon. A.
Stewart, Jot
Cuote, Sir C
i Grabby, Marquis of
'SENT LIBERALS.
.Elliee, E. Moreton. A. lid.
Euston, Earl et Nagle, . ir
Fenton, John (Yswalt:, .I,vires
Fitzgibbon, Hon It. ('. F.
Greenaway, Charles Patiscri, J.
Ha9vlmiton, Lord D. P,a,c, JoscFh
Haslie, A. Philips, NI
Hawes, B. Power, Janes
Ileatherite, G.J. •Pr)ie,
Ileatheote. Sir 4;. liipwm C.
Hindley, Charles Setioletiehl, J.
Horsman, Edward Sharpe, General
Hoskins, K. Steuart, It.
Hutt, W. Talbot, C. R. M.
Lainbton' H. Villiers, Charles P.
Lennox, Lord G. ‘Varhu Orin, 11.
Lushington, C. Ward, H. 0
Marsland, H. I \Venire, J. C.

Andovbr, Viscount
!laini,ridge, E. T.
Ilanoerimin, A.
&nett, John
Berkeley, Brantley
ISlewitt, Reginald
Blunt, Sir C.
lirmbason, Lord
Brabazon, Sir W.
Chahmirt, P.
Clayton, Sir W.
Clements, Lord
Collies, William
Crawley, S.
Currie, ttaikes
Dr Winton, W.
Divrtt, E.
Dundas, W. D.
Easthope, John

ABSENT TORIE
Goddard, Ambrose
Grant, Hon. Colonel
Grant, 1% IN,
Howard, W.
Ingham' Vobert
Irving, John
Kerr, 1).
Knox, Hon. T.
10 USUALLY VOTE WITH MI.
'HO VOTED AGAINST THEM.
John.on, General Leader, .L I'.
Jervis, h. Molosworth, Si, W.
Hume, Joseph %Yakley, Thomas

Adana, Sir T. D.
Adare, Lord
Attwood. W.
Burr, tligford
Crewe, Sir 6.
nattier, Hon. G.
De Horsey. S. H.
Feetor, H.
LIBERALS WF
NISTEItS, AS'
F ielden, J.
Fitzroy, Lord C.
Grote, G.
Goring, H. D.

Lowther, Vi.edunt
Master, Colonel
Miller, W. h.

M trg;n, C. M. R.
Pdhington, S.
Shaw, Fr.tlPriek
\Vudehou'e, nor.. E.

POLITICAL SUMMARY OF TFIE

MORNING JOURNALS.

The 31-orni»g Terrill! of this day, alluding to yesterd.iy`s,
meeting of the .tliddlesex freeholders. observes :—" A patriotic
and noble example have the freeholueiss of Middlesex set to thit
rest of England. , lit this trying emer-rey,iy.hen the hi atilt
of both the4i4o. On't les in't he Aousett4 Wait.
spiretk toielter,aoinst pats, -itisfiee. ansT:lihe'rti, -they hate
,looked to the Oiling light of prineiple, lilone, and rallied tvitb
a generous coustge round. the teuding,ered Ci4estitutrom Its
'the persons of the Sheriffs one of. the
~foulest- acts of aggres-
-sion against the eenstitutional, rights 'Of tEuglishmuu. has
been committed that any tyranny at
_any period of our
history ever. tirt.tl 'to perpetratt,."2--The' 7Vin.s thus speaks`
of the residt- discuss* on'- Thursday night to Ike
Commons, on Mr. Liddle's motion teSpeCting'bir J. Newport ; •
However,. on the whole job, takes together, the House of
Commons hat now pronounced its voice. That •voioe is a
censure of the Ministers—a plain, flat, downright ocsware—ao •
described by Mr. Lidde'i ; so received by Lord ;I'f.rpeth, who
moved En amendment of an evasive and pitiful kind, not dtgriza;
to assert that the act complained of in the resolutions was one
which ought, or to acknowierge that it was ore whirh °tight
not, as alleged by the resolutions, to be iepeated. It the re-
solution was not a " censure," why move an iimeii.tenent ? If
beaten on the amendment so proposed, hoe durst the) have the
'face to l retend, in their journals, as they have done, that the
-Government came out wf the contest " quite unscathed
Why, it is an over. helining defeat."—The Morning
Chronicle makes the following remarks with reference to the
Privilege Meeting yesterday at the Freemasons' Tavern :
" We were not mistaken in our ecojecture that foul play would
be resorted to at the meeting at the Freemasons' Tavern.
The
gs
all the farces under the designation of public meetings ever
enacted, the farce of yesterday was the most Itnpudent:
whole humbug was managed in so barefaced a manner, that if
the parties who called the meeting had any object, it was eta
cessarily defeated by the confession of fraud and itipostur •
o t u
eLhi da(sl
plied iti the whole course of the proceedin,crs."_Th Me re-
in:-
joy Post speaks as follows,
it the
Commons on Thursday night :—"
pon the important resolutions of Mr. Liddell on Thursdayen
night, we liks the debate still better. The Honourable Mover
ot the resolutions said he was rejoiced to perceive the iletermi-
nation of the Government " to.thow tigi t" upon the occasion.
We sympathised in that feeling, but still more were we re-
joiced to see the Opposition bow fight so decidedly as it dia."—
The Morning Advertiser thus alludes to the meeting yeeter-
we lirnktrtteue
day at Ilia Freemasons' Tavern 1—" Yesterday the electors of
Middlesex were again scandalised by the disgraceful proceedings
of a meeting, fraudulently pretending to give expression to thtie
sentiments, at the Freemasons"favern. Never was there a
more shameful exhibition of factious fraud than was Jakiftssted
both in the mode ot pawking the meeting and cream: tug its
proceedings. Instead of the electors of Middlesex being freely
admitted to the place of meeting, there etas a paay stet toned at
the door who scarcely admitted any elector who had not a
ticket from those convening the meeting, or wile was not too
well known to admit a question of his qualification. By this
means several electors were excluded, and others west away
in di:,gust."

DEATH OF PRINCESS ELIZABETH
Bum he Princess Elizabeth of 13runswick, rrs ae
learn by a letter from Stettin, died on the morning of the 18th
instant, of an attack of apoplexy. The Court of Prorsia has
',,one into mourning on the occasion fora week. Her Serere
Highness was great aunt tp the present Dukes Charles and
William; was born in 1746, married in 1765 to the Fringe
Royal of Prussia. afterwards to Frederick 11., was separated
from him in 1769, andbccame a widow in 1797.

- - -
Tile representatives of both Britain and France-,
seem as if opening their eyes to the impropriety of nation's
supporting all the branches •f Royal. Families, regardless of
the tact, that the heads of these famihtz have enormeo
allowances for themselves. What would be thought of the
head of any mercantile firm proposing to quaff ter his sons and
daughters on the company, as they came up, in place of.putting
them in situations to prov►de for themselves? Why, he wou:il
be turned about his business as mad. On the same principle,
then, why should the heads of Royal families not provide for
their chi.dren, in place of turning them over as reopens en
the State ; particularly when they have the seliole public
situations in the nation at their disposal. The world is under•
stood to b. getting wiser, and if a bad pr pries hat prevailed
hitherto, that is no mama why it should be continued. .Tbi►
seems to be the reasoning of the French deputies.— GUAM,
Chronicle.