The Sun.
London, England, 1815-07-05 00:00:00

ORANGE SOCIETIES IN IRELAND.

Sir H. PARNELL rose to-- make the motion of
.which he had given notice last week, when he
presehted a Petition from the !lonian Catholics
near Newry, praying that the nature of these
Orange Societies ought be enquired into. He
stated, that the Orange Societies in the North of
Ireland wet e very numerous in eight of the largest
counties in that part of the United Empire ; that
five of them form a district, and that they met in
these diStricts for the purpose of keeping tip:ani-
mosities only among neighbours : descilibed
'the nature of the oath they took, which he said
was secret, and therefore illegal, and, in fact,
,that they interfered with the ,lye administration 9f
justice, for they frequently acted both as constables
and jurymen, in the former of which characters
they persecuted the Roman Catholics, and in the
latter capacity of jurymen, wherever a cause was
• depending between an Orangeman-and a Roman Ca-
•tholic, it
.was impossible for the Catholic, to ob-
lain an impartial verdict. The Petition also 'Com-
plained, that many of the Magistrates leaned more
•to one side than the- other. That very able and
•upright Judge, Judge Fletcher, had given it as
Isis opin on to the Grand Jury of the County of
Wexford, that these Orange associations were il-
legal, anal that, unless they were put down, the
peace of the North of Ireland mast be continually
disturbed and interrupted.. He instanced a great
many rases in which bloodshed, anti sometimes
murder, had been the consequence of th'e feuds and
animosities they led to, andirepresented their far-
ther continuance to be a most grievous injury to
the lieoet, happiness, and welfare-of the commu-
nity at large. Fie concluded by moving—
Address to his Itt,yal Highness the Prince Regent, re-
questoLc that he would be graciously pleased to appoint a
co.nomisuon to inquire into time proceedings of the Orange
_Associations in the Ilbritl of Ireland:"

Mr. i!EFLF..said
.the honourable Baronet had
for the lasi three 9r tour years made it an annual
custom to hring forward a motion of this nature
.fust at the close of the Session whether it was
that he Was desirous to make a speech on the
sutjcct, and to gain popularity in that part of the
CO ullfry, he -could not say. He nnist, however,
ohj,:ct to the motion of the Hon. Baronet, be-
Cause no good t'fhcct could arise 1114111 it, hut to
revive u„,se tends and animosities which some
'.y,ais ago acre carried to a very lamentable
Iteight, hut whicii for some time p&st
,hat! been
„I,(l.,whicii, waS hoped,
granti4llv sulTittrig,
'Nvonld in tiaie Linirely die atvay. The commis-
Sion could only be for the purpose of making in-
quiry %%nether these ()tangy socicties were legal,
a" Wiled: Cr Judge Fletcher's opinions Were
reel'. It the Hun. B.tronet- meant to chaige the
Governineut with parti4ty in the admints-

tration of the laws, Ife (inert "to hare troktglit
.forwai.dhis charge in an open and manly manner
in such a 'period of the Session when it might
have had a tair and fall discussion, and not [rave
confined himself to such look and general allega-
tions as were contained in the petition from which
he made his statement. lie thought there was no-
-parliamentary kriiiind laid for an address to pro-
duce an inquiry, which Ea must repeat could do
no possible good, but might on the contrary be
the means- of mischief and injury, by blowing
into a flame embers that I.tere nearly quenehed,
and as such, he moved the previous question.
Mr. MAU RICE FITZCIER AIM differed entirely in
opinion with the Right lion. Gentleman, arid
thought the motion of high_importance, and that
it might to he granted.

Mr. V. FITZGERALD concnrred in opinion with
his Right Hon. Friend (Nr. Peek) that no'Par-,
liamentary ground had ken-laid for inquiry, and
in,oppo,ing the motion-be did it from a certainty
that it agreed to it could have no utility or good
effect.

General ARCHER 'said he was clearly of opinion
that the Orangenien had been the saviours of
Ireland, and he holed the motion would not be
agreed to.

Sir 11. PARNELL shortly replied.
Sir G. HILL deprecated the idea of going into
any topic which revived the recollection of these
terrible associations. The
who
in the
North of Ireland were those had the greatest
reason to complain, and the Itibband men had
been gtHt y of scenes of bloodshed and murder,
from which these associations alone saved. the
Country.

On a division, the numbers were-
- For the Motion
:Against it ....
Majority n,.;ainst the Motion .....
Mr. GuEN FE LL his int CllOOO to sub-
mit a motion respecting the Bank early next Ses-
sion,

90

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER brought
up stindry Papers, anrong them was the Bull of
Pope Pius I'll: for the restoration of the Jesuits.
Ordered to lie on the table.
Some Papers were also brought up relative to
Canada, and to the East India Company. -
Mr. BARING, wished to know if the Chancellor
of the Exchequer had it in. contemplation before
the close of the present Session, to introduce any
measure for carrying the Commercial regulations
of the late Treaty with America into effect.
The CHANCELLOR of the Excur.ausa said, the
Hon Gentle Man must be atvare tlrut this could not
at-present be done in any regular form, but here-
minded him"that a Bill was now in the 'House for
regulating the trade t.vith America. •
THANKS TO THE DUKE OF YORK..
Sir J. MAJORIBANKS disclaimed all personal
views in the motion he was about to submit. .He'
had not the honour even of being known to the
Royal Duke : lie acted solely from a ctuiscientions
feeling, that it tribute of respect and gratitude
should be paid by that House to the services of
the illustrious Duke. All- with tvhom he had con-
versed on the subject were of the same opinion,
and spoke hi the highest terms of praise of the
manner in which the Royal Duke had for so many
xears conducted the affairs of the army, without
any unfairness, or party-feeling, or prejudice.—
He then alluded to the grand scene last Session in
that House, when the Duke of Wellington re-
ceited their thanks, convev.i to him by the elo-
quent sptech of the Speaker; and•read the address
of the Duke of Wellington in return, in:
,which
his Grace complimented the Commander in Chief.
He, was sore it was the earnest desire of the coon-
try, iliat-theAloyal Duke should reeeive sonic
mark 'of gratitude, and he hoped what Mi-
nisters woiild take it into consideration, and bring
forward the .subject early next Session.- Mau
while, nothing could be more delightful to the
Royal Duke's feelings, that' Yu receive the thanks,
pt that House. He concluded by moving, that
the Thanks of the House be g,iven,to his Royal
nighties the Duke ofs York, Captain-General
am! Commanderiht Chief of the British Forces,
for Iris •scontimfel, effectual, and unremi tiog at-
.teotion to the duties of his office during a period
of 'more than '2O years, during which time the
army. had improved in discipline and in science to
an extent unknown before, and had, nuclei- Pro-
vidence, risen to the height of military glory. • ,
.The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER was far
from opposing- the motion, which he thought
would meet no dissentient voice ; yet, he thought
such • a motion would have been more proper
when the services of the army were brought to a
close by the termination of the war. The House,
however, would do justice to the feelings of the
Hon. Member, though they might a little over-
step the sober judgment of the case. It was na-
tural, in the moment of enthusiasm, after thank-
ing the immediate actors in the late great event,
to skew a grateful feeling towards that quarter in
which the means were framed by`which such great
achievements had been accomplished. The merit
of our troops and our Officers in this great battle
was briefly expressed' in the modest simplicity of
the Duke of Wellington's dispatch ; but the whole
might be seen to more advantage by looking at
the accounts of our Allies and of the enemy. It
was, indeed, a proud day wilco the Conqueror of
Europe was dethroned by one battle. Much me-
rit must undoubtedly be due to the Duke ch.' York,
who had for so many years conducted and orga-
nixed the army.
General FERoussos was happy in the oppor-
tunity of giving a tribute of applause -to the Royal
Duke for the improvement of the Army while
under his command.
Mr. WESTERN felt reluctance in objecting •to
the motion, but he •must do so on constitutional
grotinds. -He had no wish to -detract from the
merits of the Duke .of Yell, but was ready to
allow the full extent of his services : but had the
Office of Comniander in Chief been held by 4uy
other person, was it likely that they trould•hive
heard of this motion.? 'There Was nuthing'iit this
More than in any other office. There..was no
constitutional distinction bettveen it and the Ord-
mince, the Admiraliy, or the TreaSury. 'Was it ever
contemplated to thabk either of those offices for
doing their duty lie Would chalieoge a precedent
tor such a motion.. A Commander in Chief was
removeable like every other Officer. The time,.
Milliner, and eilcumstances, of thiS motion were'
extremely unfortunate. On the question of the

Duke. of 'Cumberland's Marriage, the meritg Of
the Duke of York had peen introduced ; and this
mOtioir appeared to rise out of the rejection of the
proposed allowatree to the Duke of •CuMberland>
Perhaps 'the Hon:- Member would say that ' lie
had.previously intended to move it ; but why hail
he postponed it till now, with only three, days'
notice ? If such a vote were passed, let• it be at
the concltision of the war. His -objections to it
were.of a constitutional nature. It-would form a
had precedent, and in all views of it he must give
it his negative.
Sir J MAioatßANts explained.
Mr. W. POLE was of opinion that a more fa=
voorable opportunity might have beet' selected for
the proposed vote ; •but when he saw that it had
been brought forward, it would wear a strange
appearance, indeed, if it did not meet with una-
nimous approbation. X.Vhat could they expect to
be done for the army, if they refused to the Duke
of York the Lair acknowledgment of his merit i
Was- he, mit w i!hstanding his merit, to be deemed
an undeserving•individtral, merely because he was.
a Metitieer of the Royal Family ? If-it was uncon,
stitutional to vote the thanks of the House to his
Royal highness, because his future conduct might
become die object of 'emisicleration, it had been
equally irregular and equally unconstitutional -to
vote their•thanks to • the Duke of Wellington.—
Had the House precluded itself by that vote 'from
investigating the future: public conduct of that
illustrious Person -Certainly not. The vote nas
a guarantee for his future conduct, but not against
Parliament for their future-censure, should it be
deserved. He was surprised that precedent should
have been coldly calculated, when it was declared
by the Duke of Wellington himself, that the vic-
tory which had shed so bright- a glory over the
British nrms, could not have been won but for
the improved condition of British troops, an im-
provement that had taken place entirely since the
administration of "the Duke of York. " Never,"
as his Grace. had written to himself, " had he
fought so hard for victory, and never, from the
gallantry of the enemy, bad he been so near be-
ing beaten." He. had added an expression of his •
astonishment at the paint of excellence, in every
military quality, to which the British army had‘
arrived ; and he hirnself- would now appeal to the
}loose, to what cause was this excellence to- be
traced but to the discriminating, impartial, and
unwearied attention of his Royal Highness the
Commander in Chief ?
Mr. BARING- was convinced that nothing had
been directed peronally by the Hon. Member for.
Essex against the Commander ,in Chief. The
only objection was upon a .constituflonal prin-
ciple, that the office held by-his Royal Highness
partook more of a civil than.a. military character.
He conceived, however, himself, that there was a
difference in this respect. lie was not of opinion
that this was the fittest occasion for coming to
vote of this nature, but when proposed, and the
awkwardness of 'withdrawing it considered, lie
could not avoid giving it his hearty concurrence.
With respect to a further pecuniary allowance, he
thought there existed strong reasons for it-, not
only on the ground of the gallant achievements
and, the complete discipline of .the army, but in
requital of the. assiduous attention, and the unre-
Mitting official fatigues so rarely submitted to by
persons of so high a rank.
Vir.BooTee supported the motion.
Colonel Wools-passed a high panegyric upon
the 12010.3.1-Y administration of the Duke of York;
as havi;ig !=nt only added greatly to the comforts
of the. s,d,lier, but as having highly improved the
tactics of the army. _
Mr. I'. METHIJEN declared himself in favour o
the vote,

1\11;. WHITBREAD lamented much of the discus.
sion that had taken place, and particularly that
any contrast should have been exhibited bet weer.

his Royal Highness and his predecessors. Upon
some of the-points that 115 d been urged, the
thanks of the House were equally due to the heads
of the various other poblic departments which had
in the due di .;cliarge of their fun et ions contributed to
the acquisition of so great a triumph. He could
have wished, too, the suggestion °fan increased
pecuniary allowance had 'been founded, not upon
the present inadequacy Of that allowance, but on

_ .
the uterito►ious exertions, which had called for
and justified an increase: As to the question in
the present vote, he knew not how to Object to it
without the appearance of ingratitude, after the
noble tribute paid to his Royal Highness by the
Doke of Wellington, on his l►►te memorable
triumph. Notwithstanding, therefore, the warmth
so unnecessarily introduced into the debate by
the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. W. Pole), 4nd
the importance of the Cons►itutional principle
suggested by his Hop. Friend (Me. Western), he
could nut withhold iris sanction.from the present
vote.

Lord BARNARD supported the motion. He con-
ceived that the
.Duke of York was entitled to
the Thanks of the House and the country, for the
high discipline of the British army, which eni,ibled

the Duke of Wellington to achieve the late splen-
did victory.
'Mr. Sec jeant BEST denied that the motion was
unconstitutional, and thought that the thanks of
the House should he given, not only to the Duke
of Yolk and the Duke of 'Wellington, but to an-
other illustrious Personage (the _Prince Regent,)
who had appointed them to their situations, and
who rejected the counsels of those who advised
the abandonment- of the Spaniards, whin the
Duke of Wellington was shut up within the passes
of Torres Vedras. Never was any Government
more prosperous than that of the Prince, and if
no other person brought forward a motion of
thanks to his Royal Highness, he should feel it
his (WI to offer such a motion, notwithstanding
his unfitness, from the situation he filled under
his Royal Highness, as Prince of Wales.
Alderman SMITI4 supported the motion, as well
as Mr.
•~~ddinaton.
FoßsEs was in favour of a pecuniary re-
ward, as he understood that the Duke of York
laboured 4t present•tider difficulties.
Mr. HART DAVIS spoke on the same side.--
After a few words front Sir J. MAJoRIBANKs in re-
ply, the questiou wAs put and carried.

favour
of
the
mAi:SSiZE OF BREAD BILL.
LEMS pfesented a Ileeition signed by 800 bakers ii
_ .

Mr. AldermanATKlNS presented a Petition from the mas-
ter and wardius of the Olporation of :Ja i is a4aiust it,

A Parr
A g 06'
Mr. F. LEWIS said, that although, fitni serer.
tions, tions, it would seem that there was an opposit:;,°;oo `6,-e•
went in the trade about the measure, the Pa",,',.-,tlle-loit
sented was from practical bakers, and he was s—Astvrf
jority really'coneerned in the trade weie for it. d 3 Or
corporate body of the Bakers' Company, he belierebut
great proportion of them were not really bakers'
factvirs and tnillers. f the sib'
Alderman ATKINS observed, that the prayer ° the'
tiort•that he presented was only for time to consider . Of
ject morefully.get
Alderman C. SMITH conceived that the bakers g
approved of the act. h bad bt6at
Mr.-ROSE was convinced, from the evidence
xe- -e jient-b
before the Committee, that it would be very eio, ,„/
the Bill should pass in the course of the pr,esenct bread 15C
Mr. LocKtimur thought that the fact 01 is
dearer by two-pence a loaf in London, than it ,wasod for
where there was ho assize, was fully suttioientgr°,"
experimental Bill for at least a year.
The Bill went through the Committee; and ~
13'11
Up the eport, - tl'e 44$
Mr. FR. LEWIS proposed, as an "'amendment,' " 4)0 fm
should riot take effect till the Ist of September, irj
agee, to, and the Bill was ordered to be read. t 1/1'
to
The H-morrow. -
ackney Coach Bill was re toned, .an- °r deij to
read a third time to-morrow. l
SHIP LETTER BILL. p
• CO-1•1;
The East India Ship Letter Bill passed througb 3 1,04.,,
tee, wlivn several new Clauses were brought 1”. Nirdt,o-Pr
INGTON, and the Report was ordered to be receive
row.—Adjourned.

FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZE.I"O'

hr
Doun"ng-d Plea'
Ci
Ga
reet, July 3, 1815.
wt;es
His Royal Highness the Prince Regent has -
in the name and on the behalf of his Majesty, to
of
Francis M'Naughten, Knight, to be one of the '1(1311'4
Supreme Court of Judicature at Bengal. ,2
1)00 be
nest: ha, also been pleased, in the name and 00!
his Majesty, to appoint Sir Edmund SttutleY:':licatilf.
one of the Judges of the Supreme • Court of ,
Madras.

BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED.' iron, fieli
fa
Joseph Graham, Maddox-street, Hanover-square, '-
July 8 to Augnst 26.
.
BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED' vepePti,
Charles Cosier, Wendover, Buckinghamshire, sh*Fine-trlAti -
George Outhwaite, Pancras-lane, City of Lund'n'
Jolhsn: NaVnhdi te,
Augustil' e bll, e21,-- eaßtielteNetn,l:SßaotituPGt l'lruwSi
la.drhka, 1
iv. i C t 8 a I l
Atto e- ral 0.1;31-Cri:
e
Lang, Aerica=square. ' --
v
Francis Alessi ter, From e-Selwood, Sonicrsetshire,s,lgteaPli
in
July 24, 25, and Augnst 18; at eleven, at the t 7, frOlP '
Frome-Selwood. Attornies Mr. Gilbert Rot!cn
.eri
or Mr. Thomas Edwards, Surrey-street, StrandLoat4los,y,
William Warne, Bedford-street, Covent-garden'i.o Attoo„.
July I I, 28, and August 15, at ten, at Guilelhal
_.„,sqlli'dj
Mr, John James Wilson, Dorset-street, SalishtniJaaa, r,m
John__ Dangerfield, Whitechapel-market, hay-s,,a,et'anel,
9, 15, and Aug,tst 15, at ten, at Guildhall. 4"
~ pli
,Coates, Paul-street, Finshury-square. „tree', i,st
"118 i II: e.i salslsl.L. Eiln(l.):Fpi gtrli.sal ttltlolClsl orton viornlw
,Ifambers, Throgln
niiilerfan, ilf_fo
Jul!
t
of England. et, $
1 keel' GOA
John Smell, Great Torrington, Devonshire,_o,_°P.loo, ,• 9
8, 29, and August 15, at twelve, at the Gl"ne i ilawlet
• Torrinton. Attornies, Messrs. Kingdon.
,'-right,.al,' 10
'Great Tot rington, or Messrs. Anstice- and
Temple, London. July if
aantdtie_ina,wkact, Gpuriilldi
Princes-stye
Jul!
ipi
John Broom Farrant, Fferrivock, DerOnshire,
ili-in;tnorl.AAutgtuosrtn.
iless,,axtierr, e"s;ae tii.
r, e ant, the White 14.."Mi.1431
Wellington, °I . 14,
Salishury-squa re. ' - 19 a" t 0.
John Baker, Northampton, woolstapler, July
Sand August 15, at ten, at the George fun, 'aellt °'
Attornies, Mr. William Lucas, Newporvra6 oft
John Alexander, New-square. Lincoln's inn; iv qs„at war
Matthew Knowles, Marple, Cheshire, tanner, dtb.,,,., Lim.4.00
29, at ten, and August 15, at four, at the Ge°Wedfora •-
rington. Attornies, Mr. Norris, John-strese, m
, R9O
or Mr: Garth Warrington. _,.... at sits.9tiou
Thomas Hook, Garth,
Yarmouth. miller, JulY. oast, ~,,,i
RamPal'l dee 9i3
at nine.'and'Angust lf,, at four, at the ilocau
Norwich. Attornies, -Messrs. Bleasdale, -;00,1•30j.
llohne, New Inn, London, or Mr. S. King,,:ic CO-9 2.'11.-"-
Joseph Levy, Boston,, Lincolnshire, iewetler, ,fo:o3os,•':iiag,
,iess._•l"°
August 15, at eleven, at the White Hart ' rs
Attornies, Mr. William Bowles, Boston, oe '
at efief.
- ton and Hall, Secondaries' Office, Temple•
and 15, , WO;
Thomas Boss, Liverpool, tailor, August ', 2'mr. josia" aoo
at the York Hotels Liverpool. Attornics,
s. KeatseY ,
liamson, Leigh-street, Liverpool, or Nlessr
vivre!,
nu fact', „a,
Spurr, Bishops ate Within•
July 17, 18, and August 15, at nj,ney
at
Maucliest
William Brown, Wigan, Lancashire; cotton-ninon!
yieVsof
Manchester: Attornies, Mr. Barrdsc',
Messrs. Milne and Parry, Temple.
' DIVIDENDS. - ' rt. I.7ii'l'ecc:-'
--1. ly g. ton, erg
LilJ,euilly„,2osl; Jii.lGerticillida,ntL_
jonudloynsn.lelrvc.hantu crosto-,._„cer""
_roipre,Yr.ll3alcrtie7-63.140:::
Iddon;
w_hury, gl,-',„.aiw'
Julysiiire '2lsi linen
—ii njiu, lyE2ss6c.xl-draper
sli' S°ltr°e,,7i'os:titanislire---,:rst;'
ker—JulyNV: Pugh, Berwiek-street,
.0
J 5.. Ep.aPuill,l Pillow,
elsatteer,
,ofCi coach-makert e rbury_L
market .• v ,
Shields, grocer—Aug. 9. • J. Wallialen,. .deverle),:nir.../r
rough, innkeeper—July 26. -G. Harwoo!, ..t00a,,,,j,
tualler—July 29. J.,White, Windsor-terraketi,,,ivg, 11k,
chant—July 25. J. Powell, Soutliiimptonb .."_';'., g 5, tr,l)l
.1../
July 26. T. Russell, Beverley, victualler-4"')
Little rrltaffOr °of
C. Hill, and A. H. Althans, Union
cornfactors—July 25. J. Russel, late of
shire, gu n-barrel-man u fact tirer—JulY
Bury-street, St. Mary Axe, !mai-ass-1 a.ei_avoi,fa.li 15, t
Spencer, late of IVolferhampton, gun-bariehant•--Jul.,stree '
2/15.ker--1 •tUreffr.
late : f olae
Gordon, T. Steadman, and S. Howland, ~„e 0
July 26. R. Dodson, late of Liverpool, rater
of pore, üburtio
merchants—
,July 27. W. Stackhouse, 1"1.
Acoungi.mor
jbv.eswielearp,i-l-saoo?t,to,:.
linen-draper.

i_ronm CERTIFICA'rES—Iviy 95* / 'OO/
late of I; tes 1.30
P. B; Jones, late of Birmingham, bardwarernan--"obetej,
ink street, wine-rnerchant—J• - of"
versmith—J. Phillips,
onger—E. Appleton, Manchester, cottusoiloanil) or
cabinet-makers—J.
Sharp, sen. and C. Sharp, jun. noroseY, Throesifr
abjnet-paliers—J. O'Brien, Copthall-buildingst.l4,, ,ior
ton-street, instnance:broker—J. Thropp, •Birniqbvietti,,'
• Kelly, Windmill-street, Finsbury-square' 'tirig
W
Chur
ard, Fressingfield,,,Suffolk ~0-rocer---'-`• sea.
Monkton Comb, So; t loth- Needham,
uerset, c
Chester, dealer.
late of Prickett-.,r

•
_ COAL MARKET, Jubl g• price, git.
Ships at, Market. Ships sold. 496' 0.-
51 Newcastle
71 Sunderland 311 ''''''' 399: 0~•
I'l 435•
21, ,
'''' 41s.

,
Blit'lliS.
wickshice ti, f •
On 'Saturday, the 24th of June, at fiartiT
on
sunda 9.. .ady of ti .. •
last, at Broom-place, the Lady of L''r
ilamp Proct} tD6
itectorirchter,
wet,
On Alo ..
or,
11.
N.,
of
a. :ea,
aJr:tiSliceltiir)l.efie 9 u,,f,ft,dt:i°:l3,3(r.
.!I(l,ty.litst, at his house in Lipper Broo.Vr.
'''' George Webster), Bart. of a *on and "

Laity of Sir C

Yesterday,O n FijaT
latSt at St. I, • y.
Esq. of the .Na". ' A Clar, .
• le 1\ avy-01tice, to Miss Ann e ePrr•
heath. .
Holmes Jackson, P.;,.q., of Gleinnore. tot r %f 130,
ter of the 1 t ' ' -
a e . uhn Whyte Melville, I,sll- :', of
captao-4
Stratbliion
. esi. , f,q„ • too
Lately, at F.dinburt.,,,h, James Pall Yfol,le, cbristili''' hire.
the Marq„i3
Ely East Indianian, to Mail 0, peeblcs
daughter of Sir dailies Natuyth. Bart. of l''''s
I‘JIIA111111? el :VE. S'l :. liolbort.),lfte• W. Bea''
' CI rch 1-lanorer-squjirir'cijaiigto

ILeesst ejrodiany.
mto7,llEinsgt; Street,.
• ole'stre
, Eicodc• land
„On the 27th alt. atfChertgey,.Alr.<.l3eniati"° 01, the 15 0,„•
at his house) CiPP.c.r %/7"°9
km the t4th of 3wit • I tat Breiteciorfc%o,3,
"fJava,Georoe A 'dr ,sq son 01 ; I,e Spec r)
ILs,„ „ iistus -suulS 01 . or of
Bengal, heir tl• to the Audi
tor, &c. a

1.4,1c,r5, Lan:l'S
(1)3N.1)(. ;
au
)N liv ,J. CAltSl'.:l I,tl;l,l\,.;:.„'f',rirt'i-15,,,any!I;v.It'• re
Oinc:F., Nu. 114,stiand; bvatiu-r`
at lite Su-
meats,&e. Jai s