The Sun.
London, England, 1815-11-29 00:00:00

DIVIDENDS.

Jackman,. Mid:2lc Scot land-yard, Whitehall, Middle-
vsx, army-clothier---d. Fitch, Colchester, Essex, linen-draper
.1. Appieyard, Queon-Anne-street \Vest,. St.'Mary-le-Bone,
11Iidd!eseN, boAceller-1. Carliil and II :Carlin, Kingston-
merchants—Wm. Bud(few and U. Byetinch, Fri-
dav-iit reel, Ll9/1111)11, Ivholcs4le grocers.-7J. Bailey, Lavenhani,
Sitirolk, carpenter—S.Corney.Stanstead, Hefts; ctirritlealtir
J.M:t 19. T. I'.lktry, Alarli-lane, merchant—Dec. 21. W.
:James, West It 6-, Wiltshire, linen-draper—Dec. 80. J. Wade,
Battle's-bridge, I`..sex., fariner—Dcc. 22. G. Jtiques, Ili ink-
Cambridge, miller—Dec. 21. J. Wheelhouse, Wigan,
Lancas hi re, cotton-manufactin er—Dec. 19. J. Grainger, Mar-
tin's-kne, Cannon-treet, provision-broker—Dec. 19. J.
Amicic, Old Band-street, perfumer—Dec. 19. Z. Dunkin,
Parker-row, Bermondsey, surrey, druggist—Dec. id. .1. J.
Simpson and W. G. Fairmnn, of the Old Change, factors—
Dec. 19. G. F. Krumbhaar, Ilaannersinitlr,
teat einegat-roaker-•-Dec. Id. J. F. Schroder, jun. Crinclied-
• merchant—Dec, .5. J. Badcoeli, Queen's lleail-pas.-
sage, Pattenoster-row, bookseller—Dec. ld. G. Ancell and
J. Sim ey, calico-printer—l)cc. 9. P.
Pestei, Great WinclieiteiAtreet, werchunt—Dec. 19. G.
Theßl.lmn and R. T. Wood, Albany New-road, Surrey, part-
tiers—Dec. 19. S. Dawson' Fiddlifford,.Dorsetsliirc, johhcr
in bollocks—Dec. 2-2. J. Pic]; worth, jun. Billingborough,
butcher—Dcc% 20. I. Mil-reit, Great ti,s;iney,
Essex, ruiNci.-Dec. 19. .1. ilundock, Eastcheap, corn-factor.

CEIITIFICAI ES—Dr.e.

J. B. S.. 13leeklitn.3t; Wapping, Middlesex, rope-nialcer--
S. Silve.:ter, liilston, !•!,toicordsltit,!, japanuer--W...Petteplier
and W. N. Steift,. 'Zed Lion-street, clerlienwell, Middle-
sex, jt'welier,--S. S. Itobinsox, Freeman's-cm:a, Cornhill,
Brinkley,,Comlaidg,eshire,
Sannc!e.r3, Q.teen-streetr, Ratcliffe, Middlesex,
'coal,merelinut—H. Pater, bland of Minorca clod
Paercliatt—S. Hobert's, Clielteollani, (louc'estershire, drug-
Nlitre-court, Fleet-street„.London.
P.-IV,TNEItSIIITS I)f.SSOLITED.,

T. 'Withers and T. .Ealing, Southampton, dis-
tiller. 3-11". 'llolater the younger, and klobner, Union-
street, Sou,ltwark, ironinongers—E. Shoubert and W. 11..
Shnobert, Hackney, .coopers—R. Tilacy and Z. Downing,
Stitton-npon-Treni, waltsters—T. Gardner and W. Gardner,
I.ivCrponl, panders—N. Pigott, J. *Bagley, E. •Itladeley,
awl il. Yates, Derby, talc-in'anufaoturers (as far ai relatcs
to I. lio:)erts, 1-11.1tobe.rts, J. Roberts, .1. Ito-
:Jetts, Ayitun, - and J. U. Roberts, Puntley, hirr,
cattco-spinncrs (as far as relates to J. ltoberts)—J. short and
L. Quinton 'Tice King's-court, Loatbard-strtet, ship and
iniuraucc-CroLcrs—G. Knox and F. I.lsley. - •

LA.vs:' iN.l•i:LiAt_ll-,Ncti.

COURT OF CHANCERY, Nov. 28.

nx-rAR'i'F. sictioLL re slintWOOD.

. • -
Mr. HARt stated, that this Was the petition of
Mr. Nicholl„ the guardian, praying that his Lord.;
shin would be pleased to give some further dime-
tiOns respecting the education and maintenance of
the infant. llis Lordship had ordered him to be
sent to the University of Cambridge ; but he had
not been there above a fortnight when be left it,
saying that he did not like a college life. HiS
guardian was now at a loss what to do with bimi
but he prayed that the expellees of his mainte-
nance might be allowed, till hie Lordship's order
was pronounced.
The Lotto CH4NCELLOR said, that if this young
Gentleman was so soon dissatisfied with a college
life, it would he difficult to find ‘vhat mode of
life might be agreeable .to him. He had been sent
to the University, at his awn regnest, and had
made thelairest promises to his Lordship, to con-
duct himself with the utmost propriety. His
Lordship could not send hint back, as he had no•
power to order the college to receive him again ;
brit if he could find a person who Would under-
take to controul his conduct, he would immedi-
ately make an order to that effect, -
The brayer of the petition vas then granted.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov. 21.
NITAIDER.
THE: KIM; V. THOMAS.

Mr. TOPPING and Mr. LAWES Sbewed cause
again,t a Rule, obtained by the Attorney-Gene=
mai, for a Certiorari to remove an indictment
agaitot the pi inner for wilfnl 'murder, front the
jurisdiction of the Corporation of the city of Ro-,
ehester into this Court, in order to be tried by a
Jury of the county of Kent. It be recollect•
ed that the prisoner, a marine on board one.of
his Majesty's ships paying off at Chathani in Au-
gust' list, had shot the deceased, who was ap-
proaching the ship in a shore boat, as was sup-
posed for some improper purpose The ground
of the application Was, 'that the pt ironer was not
likely to have a sati4actory trial, from the pau-
city of freemen of the city who were entitled to
sit on Juries, by reason of which. the prisoner
could not have his proper number of challenges.
Qn the part of the Corporation, affidavits were
now put in by the Town Clerk and others, stating
that the number of resident freemen was 400;
that the pant,..ei; in ordinary cases, usually con-
sisted of thirty jurymen, and that, on extraordi-
nary ones, the number was extended to fifty;
that the deponents were not aware of any preju-
dices- existing against the prisoner; and they
knew nothing: to the contrary but that the pri-
soner would have as far and impartial a trial in
Rochester as any where else ; but that the Cor-
poration were indifferent upon the subject, and
were ready to abide the decision of the -6-iort.—
Extracts of the eity's charters were introduced
into the aCidavits, which declared that no Sheriff
or JuStice of the county of Kent shall interfere
Wifh the jurisdiction of the city.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL, after repeating •the
topiesiviticiihe urged in support of the, motion
originally, contended, that the charters did not,
:lioweeer, take aw-4 the right or the Crown to
interpose its prerogative when it saw Et.

'Pie Court were clearly of opinion, that the
Attorney General ha;' a right, upon motion, to the
certiorari, and also to a habeas corpus, to I►rin,2 up
the body of the priso►►er, to be tried at b:tr. This
was clear upon the authority of 14 lien. VI. c. I.
and of the cases ►mentioned in Male's Pleas of the
Crown, 2 C. 52 ; but Whether the record_ shmild
be afterwards tried at nisi Arius, depended upon
the pleasure of the Attor►►ey General, the Court
for the present having nothing to do With that
Tiestion.—Rule absolute:

BATES V. WINSTANLEY.

This case was argued at some length the
course of the tel It respected the jut isdiction
of the Magistrates of the county of Leicester
over the South Fields, a district claimed to be
rateable by the Magistrates of the Borough of
Leicester. The Chief justice this day delivered
the opinion of the Court, going over the 'various
chatteri and statutes cited in the course of the
argument, and deciding, that the South Fields by
law might be rated by the Magistrates of the
county, and consequently that the disttess in this
case had been properly taken.—Judgment of non-
suit.