The Sun.
London, England, 1852-04-30 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

ROUSE OF COMMONS, April 29.
The SPEAKER took the Chair a few minutes before
Four o'clock.

PRIVATE BUSINESS.
The Bury (Sussex) Road Bill and the Deptford Gas
Bill were read a third time and passed.
The following Bills were considered and agreed to:—
London, Tilbury, and Southend Railway.
Southern to Kineton Road.
South-Eastern and Reading, Guildford and Reigate
Railways.
dCA enmteranldrnent
Porihdirillaen and Nanthwynant Roads.
Mr. MASTER MAN moved that the order for re-
ferring the City of London Gas Light and Coke Com-
ae Consumers' Company
f Selection, be read and discharged.—
A of Acts Bill, to the
PETITIONS.
Several petitions were presented praying for the re-
peal of the Maynooth grant.
Mr. G. SAUNDERS presented a petition from Liver-
gn Committeereed Amalgamationa
tn od . o Great
and
Liver-
pool in favour of the reteetien of the Crystal Palace.
Admiral STEWART presented a similar petition
from Greenwich.
Major BERESFORD presented a similar petition from
Saffron Walden-
Mr. HuNIE presented a petition from Braintree against
the Charitable Trusts Bill.
of the Crystal Palace.
petition from Farnham
Presented a similar petition from
in
iuMfarry..osullcrOffoDfotrrSFeltpi presented
la
30,000 of the inhabitants of Birecitigham.
tit r.T.
REYNOLDS presented
presented
Fite,bury.
a raestiitmioinlarfrpoemtittihoen from
Cor-
porationAfrß of Drogheda in favour of the admission of Jews
into Parliament.
Sir DE LACY EVANS presented several petitions
from various parts of the metropolis in favour of the re-
tention of the Crystal Palace; also a similar petition
from the metropolis signed
by 50,222; and a petition
from the owners and occupiers of the buildings in the
neighbourhood of the Palace in favour of its removal.
Mr. J. B. HOPE also presented a petition against its
continuance.
Lord PALMERSTON presented a petition from the
Literary and Mechanics' Institution of Preston, praying
that all Parliamentary printed documents may be sup-
plied to them and other similar institutions gratuitously.
Lord DUDLEY STUART presented a petition from
Marylebone in favour of the continuance of the Crystal
Palace.
Mr. BRIGHT presented a petition from a Dissenting
for the abolition of the Maynooth and
grants;Re-
irT
and a petition from a plsce in the West Riding, in favour
of from Navan in fa-
vour of the Tenant-right Bill.
hand-
loomMr. EWART presented a petition from the
gbo
tio':sTriefl3aal3r3". education;
weavers of Scotland, praying the House to facilitate
.
also, a similar petition from Boston,
,
ehrnorateeractirm,zli(zailopt some measure for establishing

Mr. SANDFORD presented
petitions from the at-
torneys of Reading praying for the repeal of the certi-
&ate duty.
Mr. WYLD presented a petition from Bodmin in
favour of the retention of the Crystal Palace.
Lord R. GROSVENOR presentod a similar petition
from West Brompton; atso a
petition from St. Luke's Hos-
pital, praying to be ezem t from the operation of the
Charitable Trusts Bill. P
Mr. COWAN presented a petition from the hand-
loom weavers of
colonization, a place is Scotland in favour of home

Mr. BAILLIE presented a petition from the hand-
loom weavers of Ayrshire complaining of distress, and
praying the House to relieve them by a system of emi.
gration.

- Mr. WAELEY presented petitions from the city of
London, Hammersmith, and other places, in favour of
the retention of the Crystal Palace.
Mr. M. MILNES presented a similar petition from
the Whittington Club.
Mr. HEYWOOD presented a similar petition from
the visitors at the Crystal Palace.
Mr. HINDLEY presented similar petitions from diffe-
rent parts of the country.
Mr. PIGOTT presented a petition from Reading for
the preservation of the Crystal Palace.
OUTRAGE UPON BRITISH OFFICERS.
In reply to a question from Lod MAHON,
Mr. HERRIES stated dust negotiations were still
pending with the Austrian authorities relative to the
outrage which was committed at Aden last year upon
certain British offh
" HOUSEHOLD NARRATIVE."
Mr. SCHOLEFIELD said, as some uncertainty pre.7
veiled with reference to the intentions of the Government
as to further prosecuting the household Narrative for
if
in-
fringing the Stump Act, he should therefore gladhcL
the Learned Attorney-General would state distinctly
what was intended to-
be done.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said the
of the Crown, as well as Mr. Justice_ou Crompton,
of Exchoropatwtm officersExchequer,rlwere
dis3ati:,fied with the decision of the r
bee had no doubt that the
argument, and then the
previous opinion, withoutany
and, therefore, he had receaihm nded that a fresh suit
should be commenced, on which
matter Court coafaEldubbeegaaurerriewdotuolda court of appeal, when th©
according to their
law would be finally settled.
Mr. BRIGHT wished to know if instructions to that