The Sun.
London, England, 1852-06-10 00:00:00

ourtt Vition

The New Stakes.

Hy
Prevention
Pug Orrock

86 p-

23 7c3

The St. James's Palau° Stakes.
Daniel O'Rourke ••• ••• •
Alcoran ... ••• ••• •

.03%
63

104%

... 1

94 th,

... 2
... 3

... 2

RAILWAY TRAFFIC RETURNS.
THE GREAT NORTHERS RAILWAY..—(MiIes in work, 223,
Returnof Traffic for the Week ending May 30, 1652:-
Passengers, parcels, carriages,
horses, dogs, and mails ... £6,099 19 5
Merchandise and minerals 50.89 18 3
Cattle ... ... 164 6 6

21%
39%

Total ••• ... X 11,751 4 2
Corresponding week, 1851 (236 miles):—
Passengers, parcels, &c. ... £7,026 18 5
Merchandise, Cattle, &c. 3,735 1 11

Total 0 4
LANCASEDRE AND YORITURIC PUILWAY.— (260 miles
open.)—Traffie for week ending June 6....£22,108 3 8
Corresponding week in last year (260
miles open) ..
....£16,784 12 4
CHESTER AND HOLYHEAD RAILWAL..TrafEC for the
week ending June 6:—

Passengers ... ...
Parcels, IL C. and D. ...
Goods, cattle, &c.
Mails

MAIN LINE.

... £l,BOl 7 6
... 82 0 0

ALLEGED MURDER AND VIOLATI°;80.0
On Taerday Mr. W. Baker opened an inquiltPet.
Foresters' Arms, Old Ford-road, Victoria-park, re.„.°r„
ing the death of Maria Leech, aged eighteen ye..;;ge
single woman, who was found dead in Sir are," Si,
Duckett's Canal. Mr. John Parr, residing at NO. if: se,
John's-terrace, South Hackney, an independent ge'left
man, stated that the deceased was his servant. Sbek,f
his residence on Friday morning at eleven o'clock! —O9
holiday, with directions to return at eight o'clock 'Eitel
evening. She was quite cheerful when she depst",-ri
and witness had not seen her alive since. She Yilips.,„vily.
regular in her duties, and attentive to the 1111-o
Witness had mado inquiry and ascertained that
bad
body hid been found in the canal, which he Ie
since seen and recognised by her di's"' gad
did not believe sho had committed suicide.
heard that she had been on a visit to her aunt. Decrial
was an excellent servant, and had no followers. 4P:„.1-61
Brown, the aunt, was c tiled, and said that she r,,69;',ity
at Bromley. The deceased came to see her on •P
last, and remained until seven o'clock in the evev"T
ter
wLen she left to proceed across the fields to her 03116". ad
et..
bouso at Hackney. She had a little basket h lots
a pair of cloth boot 3, which she had purchadeu,l;he bet
she left witness. She bad only a few coppers "" of
when she departed. Mr. Edward Moore, surgOrsbe
No. 86, Bethnal-green-road, said he had exatnineuita of
body, and found a bruise on the left eye, and ma et'
on the neck, as if the arm of 00(1 pros
son had been closely pressed round it, and her ;ed.
exhibited marks as if they had been tightly gril.ler'
There were bruises on other parts of hervii,`ced
son, which he was of opinion had been in"—bad
previous to immersion in the water. Witrless
a
lso ascertained that -some connexion had very recentlyof
taken place, but there was no hemorrhage provis
particular violence. Susannah Keppell, wife of a
with
Ver,
shop keeper, stated that she saw tne deceased
sailor on the Friday night, about ten o'clock. -tn
entered the Yarmouth Arms, in Green-street, idetunebe
green; but witness only knew her by the bonnet id
had on at the time. Vaughan, summoning cille"' gi
they had since found the deceased'sshawl
by the dragl
The basket had also been recovered at a pUblie.house'r
Folly•bridge, where it had been sold for a Pint of: bibs
on the Saturday, by some person who picked it up to
_0
field near the canal. No barges were allowed to e;;...
through it. It was kept fur pleasure-boats and batb
aiseSd
The road-way was not dangerous, and the th:ce,
could not have walked in from the main thoroughia'ror
The inquest was adjourned to give the police title
further inquiries.

SEABORNE MAILS.
[N signifies that the mails aro sent from the Ger,or
by the night—and M by the naorning—Aispateh.]

rost-ottoo

When made up is 1 Frem what when
PLACER. General Post-of lice port die- diso•
London: patched.
..............!
_ ...—....—....., ...nor ........................
i .I.fune 17
America (by Brit. pktON June 11 .. ..!Llverpoo' • rrivcd
I A
America (by U.S. pkt.) N ,
.. ..,LivorPo°-:' July 3
America (by U.S. pkt.) M June 9 .. ..iSotithanlP'•
Australia (via South- I
ampton) .. .. .. M. .. .. .. ISonthaniPt •
•• 1
DDlittttoo,(vviiaach.loairsGe.ilhllosp)e
NNlA.u.gust. 2 ...
.. jDover • •
Africa (West coast).. N 14th of the montn June 18
Alexandria* ........ N 19th & 80th of nao.;Dovor
.. Day
Belgium .. .. .. N; Daily .. „. .. 'Dover
t June 16
Brazil .. , • .. M 9th of tho month ISouthamp •
rune 0
Buenos Ayres .. .. M 9th of the month SonthainPt- ''.,. nn .40
California(viaChar, r, er) M,2d & 17th of month Southampt. .H 20
Cape of Good Hope NI 14th of Juno .. irlyrnonth.. Juni! 20
Cape de Verde .. .. N August 2 .. .. Iplymouth• • Jurricio
IpP4lyniymowautthh....
June
29
Constantinople* .. • • :Nith 17th 27th of mo Dover ••AL 20 _
_.
Central America .. M2d & 17th of mon. Southampt. •BweP
Channel Isles .. .. N Aron., Wed., & Fri. Southampt. Tr'. i 14.620
Chili .. .. .. . Mil7th of the month ISouthampt. Juneeoo,lll
France .. .. M& N Twice daily .. .. !Dover • • Ty`i
•ed
Greece*.. _ .. Nl7th 17th27thof mo 'Dover .. Afro
~..t.
Hambargh .. .. N Tuesday Se Friday !London .. Tnee:,7,l.
Ireland Honduras
Holland ~ • • .. M Wodnes. & Satar. j London .. M •,-,`:
India (via Southamp.) Ml2Oth of the month Southampt. June' p
mouth Southampt. Juni! Anal
0.7
3.4.8 c
NNlTv4l7thceofdathiley..
India (viaMarseillea) W sthiz,24th ofmontb Dover .. jthme. 7
Plymouth
India, via C. of G. Hope N 15th or month ..
.. Holyhead.. j TlO- secr•
Mauritius .. N 15th of mouth Plymout.i..
Mediterranean (via
Ifediten anean (via ~
eofmmoonnthth DBOuvtheraMP.t.. IlJarnee:l•7
ItSoarsotheamillesp7).. .... D&N,B2thOthao2f4tthh
.. .. .. Ml9th of the month Southampt,' June '-
Mexico .. .. .. Ml2d of the month.. Southampt.lJulY ,4
, DsioonDvt
floe.
rya: p
~ . i I .
3;7 . .
June
-n, ,
..n
e: :
0:
i riiol
i tt 30th of month
Naples*Peninsular..
Maltanin
s Madeira
1. ... ..:: : :
mNr
751htthil'illitthhi:21759ttlithio:f7mmtobo
Papal States* .. .. N sth 15th 25117 of mo; Dover • • I°
g"" 12
Peru
~ .. .. .. 31 17th of the month Southampt. t 5110:
Tuscany* • . .. • . N sth 15th 25th of mo Dover • •IJau-o
--
2: West Indies .. .. 31 17th of the month Southampt. j.,'
...
West Indies (exec.+

Naples* • • • • • • NI
Papal States* N
Peninsular.. .•
Peru • • •• •• • • 31
Tuscany* .. • . N
West Indies •• Id _
West Indies (except
Havanna & Nazsati) 1112(1 of the month .. ISouthanspt. I
voyed PI
* The mails to those c ountries thus marked (C) a" con
French packet via Marseilles.
e enin°
The India mall, via Southampton, will be made up on tb:s-viid4l.
of the 19th instant, in consequence of the 20th falling on
,bo 001
The Peninsula mail will be made up on the morning of
instant, in consequence of the 25th falling on a Sunday

THE BARR FORGERIES AT -I •
sHEFFIELD.....y, re
Grape], whose examination on several charges of baetkilirlt
genies appeared in Saturday's publication, was agehl,brc:,.atip
up before the Sheffield borough magistrates on Weuil—ared
Alr. Mullens, solicitor to the Bankers' Association, SPlleace
to conduct the prosecution. The only addilonal atsbire
was the proof, on the part of the Coventry and Virarwic'l9B/.
Banking Company, of the forgery of the draught for
Agers
I Is. 2d., which the prisoner paid to Messrs. Joseph
and Sons, cutlery manufacturers, in September, 1851, itidit of
ment for goods which he had purchased to the am° f the
801. Payment of money was also proved in the ceslitli,
forgery at West Bromwich, where a draught on Zior
Payne, and Smith's, of London, in the name of the I'd 00
chester and Liverpool District Bank at Stafford, was PaiAshill
the 29th ult. to Messrs. Davies and Bloomer, of Go the
tbe
New Ironworks. After the depositions had been reafectlf
prisoner said—" The statements of the witnesses are per _ries
ti ue. lam the only guilty one. I executed the forg,
myself, and there is nobody else implicated in any vrslvi*
executed all with my own hands, and nobody else kr': ter
word about it." The prisoner was committed to x or'
trial at the assizes.

-----10_...--:"'
'

queCst°wiwasNteßl:lB at Maidstone
produced before the coroner thaatit
of a butcher at Maidstone. It
twoasrudpspClyhitthteenbdaernr,acakysownnitgh
appeared from the evt Reed
INQUEST.--On
the
nteandeceasedThursdayaoohnfnaiWtdat—hsheic'tel
0I :abaata:napru
if,: e s 01-41 f:
of a portion of the contract objection had been taken idt:l;
both as to its quality and its freshness. The deceased ,;',i,
came excited, and
throat cut in
was also shown that segveorrej
stroyed themselves whilst urn
abnadildsihnortily afterwards was found with e.
Royal, LI edmrelerymmubieenerdtaa L.; :f t
hh i the
delusion. workhouse'familyT had
:i de-
was
be JuT f '
after a 10
" ng-ccmtielted investigation, returned a verdict
Temporary insanity."
LIE 3,
lANCHESTEIt CHARITIES.--The Tbestre
el"
ancheQter, has been thrown open for six nights P, to
formances, in oider thet the gross receipts may be devoted
the benefit of the various charitable institutions of Mancha"
ter and Salford. The performances commenced on Mon eta
evening, under the distinguished patronage of the Qee.lll
Prince Albert, and most of the influential inhabitantS '„
Manchester and itineighbouthcoe. In addition to the meinhex"
of the dramatic corps of the Theatre Royal, wheat once volutr
teered their assistance, several performers of eminence ;
eluding Miss Helen Faucit, Mr. and Miss VandEnhoff; Dgi..
Glyn, Miss Fenny Vining, the Batmen children, and
Barry Sullivan) have given their gratuitous services for
otbui
e
occasion. The receipts on Monday and Tuesday were
ab
260 L, and a handsome sum of money is likely to be reslis3"
most
PROTECTIONIST ESTIMATES.—Perhaps tt e . t
curious item in the estimates agreed to by the Protection:s_
Government is the estimate that has been fottnei o f act
national honour, which (ride the Mather case) has been
°
dowj at two biuldreii and Nrty pepc1,40.4140/6

.. .1 %,

ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS, REGENT'S.

PARK.
The second general exhibition of plants and flowerra
at gardens tlok place yesterday, but to 01
wetness f the weather few persons were presentbeyond_
the orokssional hort'culturists immediately interest
in toe show end those determined amateurs whom 11°'
thing so ,n daunt. In themselves the collections were re-
markably fine, and although numerous, would havibeel!
more abundant had not the almost certtoa prospect °`
r
continuous rain prevented the exposition of many othe?'
The heaths end azaleas were, perhaps, the most Pleat,!
tul in proportion, and reiicct::d great credit on the
grower'. The orchideous plants were also remarkalo:Y
good, but not in such nunoLers 03 at the preceding fete'
The same observation will apply to the quality of the
pelargor:ums and the stove and greenhouse Outs'
Roses, cinerarias, calceolarias, end the other hosts CO'
plated the crowds which filled the marquees. The
which generally attract so much attention, were OF:
strained to expand their sweetness upon the vacant el'
The American plants, which foimed on the precedbt
Saturday a special show by_themselves, but were then
rather backward in flower, owing to the coldness of the
season, were on Wednesday in magnificent condit,l%
Nothing, indeed, was wanting but a sunny sky to bare
made this exhibition most successful, the number
rckets 'ssucd to the fellows and their iiiends having el.
Of
cecded all formers years. We subjoin en official
the chief prizes awarded:—

MEDALS WITH THEIR MONEY VALUE.
EXTRA GOLD, 30/—To Mr. Frenklin, gat...rt.vi--
a
Mrs. Lawrence, Ealing-park, for 25 orchids.
LARGE GOLD, 151,—T0 Mr. May, gardener to V.
Lawrence, Ealing-pork, Mr. Cole, gardener to g,r• ,
Colyer, Dartford, for 30 stove and greenhouse Pgln''
end to Mr. Cole.
MEDIUM GOLD, 101.—To Mr. Greer, gardener to 5!
E. Antrobus, Cheam. Surrey, for 20 stove end glne„,.."
house plants; Mr. Blake, gardener to Mr. J. Ithu"—(i
Stratford-green, for 25 orchids; Me3sre. Rollinson en
Son, nurserymen, Tooting, for 20 orchids; Mr. Woollofs
gardener to Mr. H, B. Kerr, Cheshunt, Herts, for
orchids.
20
GOLD MEDAL, 71 —To Mr. Speed, Edmonton, 'l°-
r
stove and greenhouse plants; Mr. Smith, gardener
Mr. W. Quitter, for 12 cape heaths; Mr. Smith,
wood, for 12 Cape heaths. Onen class—Mr. Green•ri,
dener to Sir E. Antrobus, for 10 greenhouse azaleas:
Mr. Robinson, gardener ta Mr. J. Simpsor, Thelnig; -
bank, Pimlico, for 12 pelargoniums in 8-inch P°
Messrs. Lane and Son, nurserymen, Great Bakh9ll,
stead, for 12 distinct varieties of roses in 13-inch P°er
LARGE SILVER GILT 51.—T0 Mr. Stanley, go,rcle:3o:
for 30 stove end greenhouse plants ; Mr. Dods; ,710
dener to Sir J. Cathcart, Cooper's-hill, Surrey, 'n* go
stove end greenhouse plents ; Mr. May, gardelii.
Mrs. Lawrence, for six greenhouse azaleas ; gar
liams, gardener to Mr. C. B. Warner, Hodesdon,
for 25 orchids ; Mr. Green, gardener to Sir B
.P'e
bus, for six orchids ; Mr. A. Rowland, Lewisham,
for eight distinct varieties of roses in 13-inch pots.
LARGE SILVER, 41.—T0 Mr. Green, gardener to Sit
E. Antrobus, for six tall cacti ; Mr. May, gardenerop,
Mrs. Lawrence, for 12 Cape heaths ' • Messrs. Rollins
nurserymen, Tooting, for 12 Cape heaths ; gr• for
rigan, gardener to Mr. E. Lowrance, Kentish Toval et
12 pelargoniums in 8-inch pots ; Mr. Parker, gate',
to Mr. J. M. Straehen, Teddington, for six 17 Bp,
goniums in 11-inch pots ; Mr. Turner, nurseri'sf,
Slough, for six fancy pelargoniums in 8-inch p 915 ; •Dolt
Robinson, Pimlico, for six fancy pelargoniums in 8:I 8.
pots ; Mr. Hoyle, Reading, for six pelargoniums In
inch pots.

ARCHES COURT.—(THIS DAY.)
(Befor,- Sr JOHN DODSON.)
Tax OFFICE OE JUDGE PROMOTED DY HODGSON V. GLAD-

STONE.—JUDGMENT.
The Learned Judo deliver,Al the jurlgment of the
Court in this important case to-clty. IL said the suit
was instituted by virtue of leLters of request from the
Bishop ~f London, pursurdat to the statute of the 31 sod
4th 01' Vie., c. 86, c yuneouly called the Chureis
plinr Act, by %II:eh he w,-,s enabled to send cases of
this deseripljoa by letters of Lit to the Court of
APPeal of the previous, t) the there/Yard end determined
,ce'rding to the seed ~f that court. It was
hardly
accessary to sta.' the proo, edinga in the case,
as that had already be,,u done on one or 01 o OCcasiOiv,,
bat ho might as wed of s,,rre that, by virtue of these
let er* of request a citation issued from the Court, which
Was returned widi 0, certificate stating it had been per-
sonally served upon Mr. Gladstone; that en appearance
was given for him by his proctor,who prayed for articles;
th kt, those artiel-s were afterwards brought in and a,?.-
niit e(1 by Mr. Gladstone without any opposition. Upon
the following court dav, after ti:e admission of the aril-
eles, he denied tho lst, 4th, sth, 10th, and 11th articles,
.sand admitted the truth of the remainder, viz.: the 21,
3d, 6th, 7th, and Bth. The Learned Judge then
detAiled the subsequontatages which were gone through,
and Raid, as the publication of the articles had been
n
rtts3c'd, the case now stood for judgment. The offence
charged against Mr. Gladstone was contained in the
bedding of the articles, and was publicly reading prayers,
preaching, administering the holy sacrament, and per-
form other divine (Bees, in an unconsecrated chapel,
celled Long-acre Chapel, in the parish of St. Martin's,
and in the diocese of London, without any licence from
the Bishop, the previous licence buying been revoked by
him, and contrary to the prohibition of the Bishop,
The first of the articles set forth the law of the case,
but the Court having pronounced its judgment on the
lave as applicable to the facts charged in the articles, and
tie to the right of the Bishop to revoke the licence, and
to prohibit Mr. Gladstone from performing divine ser-
vice in the chapel, it would not be necessary to discuss
that point again. The cases which had been cited ap•
Peered to him to put the matter beyond all doubt—at
least so far as to prevent the Court coming to a con-
trary conclusion. The remarks, which were somewhat
irregularly made, in reply to what fell from the Court,
he had listened to with great attention; but, in his
!Tinton, they were not such as to induce him
in the slightest degree to doubt the correctness
of the conclusion he had arrived at, or the principle as
laid down in those authorities. Adhering, then, to his
view of the law, and the facts charged in the articles,
the principal remaining question was whether those
facts were established by sufficient proof; but before
entering upon that, it might not be improper to notice
Certain of the objections offered by Mr. Gladstone's
Counsel to the irregularity of the proceedings. First,
he said, that in consequence of the omission of the
Word in the citation served on Mr. Gladstone, the
iiiehop of London was described in that document as
" Father God," instead of " Father in God." This
!natter, it was contended, must be deemed of high
importance, and of essential value, inasmuch
as a title of a blasphemous character was attributed to
the Bishop, from:which it might be supposed he intended
tt° assume the title " Father God," which it was men-
;pled was given to the Pope. Papa nostrum dominus
eus• He scarcely knew whether the Learned Counsel
.!',as serious in taking this objection, but in his opinion
" certainly did not carry that weight with it to which
he
seethed to think it was entitled. The omission of this
r"osyllable was, in fact, a mere clerical error, and it
r?.d been almost admitted to be so. The Bishop was
olfghtlY described in every other part of the instrument
Citation, and the accidental omission of the word could
„hlu.ti therefore, mislead anybody; it did not, at any rate,
riotalead Mr. Gladstone, for he duly appeared to the cite-
lain' This then was a very trifling matter, for it was
Psssible gravely to suppose that the Bishop meant to
/* rime the blasphemous title which the Learned Coca-
tio:aid he did. Another objection was, that the cite-
th ,Was served in the diocese of Winchester, whereas
doe letters of request were issued in the diocese of Lon-
and this wee said to be informal under the Church
de"nne Act; but the Learned Counsel laboured
er some Are, confusion as to the constitution of the Court of
ap„e"_°,', and did not distinguish between that court in its
in re 't character and in its more limited jurisdiction
Legui
could
sating the peculiars of the Archbishop. There
Pell doubt that if a citation, issued from an sp-
it ;lint oeurt to a clergyman in the province over which
litei,ad jurisdiction, was served anywhere within the
it ss‘" ef the province, that service would be binding if
the as followed by an appearance. That was precisely
ehrttl3l*Rseent ease, and it was vain, therefore, to contend
by Gladstone was not properly before the court,
thareason of undue service. A further objection was
t
Glee the proceedings were instituted against Mr.
two—stonentalus celeritum—that fourteen days wer©
oolte" by the Church Discipline Act, for issuing
tb mulission before a party was obliged to appear;
Rt he
once . re the proceedings were taken against him at
gala in the Arches Court, and without any opportunity
pu g afforded him to consider what course he should
Dryer that ho was in ops toncili, and was led into
%ser consequence of the speed which was unduly
profit e the occasion. Now, Mr. Gladstone appeared by
seith,l. in the usual way; he had
heldful opportunity to eon-
ei,euts professional a dvisers ; and ould not see to what
10eValitage he was exposed. The Court only foi-
l:3(4,i' the usual course which was adopted in all cases.
h '"es, Mr. Gladstone was resident on the spot, and
e admitted all the main facts charged against him, and
(ftletiat4renore, on every occasion when he applied for
Tee,tY' the Court acceded to his applicatien. The
htwthed Judge having thus expressed his opinion on the
to tbaPPlicable to the facts, and on the objections urged
whe,tlUrisdiction of the Court, proceeded to consider
wer the proof of the facts was sufficient or not.
done 4th and sth articles were in reality the only ones
Of LI" by Mr. Gladstone; they set out that the Bishop
tho laden did, by instrument under his own hand, on
linen 16th January, 1852, duly revoke and make void the
of which he had previously—to wit, on the Ist day
pie4ugust, 1851, granted to Mr. Gladstone, during his
se asure, to perform the office of minister in the uncon-
vactratted chapel known as Long-acre Chapel, in the
effl,ei;"„hf St. Martin's, &0., and further prohibit him
-`4Ung or discharging any ecclesiastical duties in that
heal3sl or elsewhere, in the iocese of London, and thmt
a
which instrument was duly served on him on the 19th
?
is of of
January. The fifth article simply annexed
°' of the instrument of revocation end prohibition.
Though Mr. Gladstone denied the truth of those articles
h! admitted the two subsequent ones, that the instru-
,:e,iit bore the signatere ot the Bishop, and also his
cii",aeopal seal. The question was whether it had been
served. It was first said the service of the revoca-
n4sh and prohibition ought to be proved by two wit-
jsss; but he was of opinion that it was only necessary
0 bring the issuing of the instrument to the knowledge
of Mr. Gladstone, and that a formal service in the pre-
sence of witnesses was not necessary. That Mr. Gladstone
Was made acquainted with the nature of the document was
placed beyond all doubt by the evidence adduced in the
case. It was first served on him at his chapel on Sunday,
the 18th, previous to divine service, and as he denied
the validity of the service on that occasion, it was sub-
sequently served at his residence, in accordance with his
oven appointment. The next objection was that the licence
to preach was not given during the Bishop's pleasure,
out absolutely; but a witness stated that he saw the li-
nes in the registry, and that it wee " daring pleasure."
zut even supposing it was an absolute one, the authority
°F Dr. Dillon was directly applicable to the present
case, because he held, and he thought properly, that in
141 cares the same power which gave a license had the
Power to recal it. But there was every reason to sup-
Pose the license to Mr. Gladstone was during pleasure.
The instrument being therefore legal and le-
gally served, and Mr. Gladstone having ad-
mitted that on the following Sunday ho publicly
reached and read prayers, &c., end continued
do so up to the present time, or at least until he
made his admissions, there appeared to him complete
Proof; either in the evidence of witnesses or in the ad-
Missions of the party himself, that he was guilty of the
of with which ho was charged. After alluding to
some other technical objections the Learned Judge con-
cluded thus:—l am, therefore, of opinion that the
Iliahop of London had power to revoke the license at
his will and pleasure. end had power to prohibit Mr.
Gladstone from continuing to perform divine service in
the chapel; and that, notwithstanding the revocation of the
license, and the prohibition of the Bishop, he has still
continued to perform divine service. That being so, I
consider the facts charged in the articles are supported
by sufficient proof, and I therefore admonish Mr. Glad-
Stone to refrain from reading prayers, from publicly
Preeching, or administering divine offices in the uncon-
aeerated chapel of Leng•mere for the future, until he
obtains a license from the Bishop, and from performing
diem service there or elsewhere within the diocese ot
44hodon, in the province of Canterbury, until he obtains
Inch license, and I likewise condemn him in costs.
dr. TEBBS, the proctor, said he would appeal
agsiost the decision.
The JUDGE—Very well.

COURT.—(THIS DAY.)
`'-'efere JAMES &MCI-JELL, Esq•, Under-Sheriff.)
A CURT
-.°UB WIND-UP OF A CHANCERY SUIT—BISGOOD
Thi V. LLOYD.
"Ce
8 was an inquiry under a proceEs in outlawry
thy_eto
defertain what lands, tenements, goods, and chattel.
._k of the
Sh4.`4l3t was possessed of within the bailiwick
'„'11. of Middlesex.
the T BoBIPBoN CHITTY appeared for the plaintiff in
jud 811 it, and star(' that the plaintiff had obtained
comt'nt against the defendant in one of the courts Of
acie;°,ll Ift,w, and the present proceeding had been
for,„riTh'!". to obtain any property belonging to the de-
et us to secure the plaintiff to the extent of the
"out
instit Le; and although the present proceedings were
Was Med by the Crown, and the property
b , neually forfeited to the Crown, it would
Vivered up to the creditor. The defendant in the
Ceent scion bed been the plaintiff in a suit of Chao.
another suit,
by a cross bill had been made a defendant in
of snit. In the first suit he was entitled to a sum
the;::' 15%, and in the other to a larger amount, never-
' 42? 'Lll)ject to any dccrce of the Ma,ter.
Court'"ng didenssien ensued, fur the judgment of the
titer, " Cbaneery had not been drawn up for want of
Thic'r as the judgment W 33 only delivered in April las-.
so 1'11;4-lutes et the jud,zment were produced, bur, were
ueaCeTt'lligiMo that the Learned Under-Sheriff re•
The
LEARNED
they might be put in form.
the utimiEtAßNEn COUNSEL sidd that the tranrcribing
The UN
'
, would not take a minute.
takes tlat, OthertEi:SZlEßM—wal, than, go en, and I will
eu,sjes•
mir,uts of the •,,4_,"leb, the rccistrar,
1,-.noted to the
Mr C J"'gna-lat . 'BITTY tsuid
bu;, the cirawin,, p judgment could not bo altered,
he defendant tuti. °f the order was another matter, for
441911 Wight Win uP the order iii