The Sun.
London, England, 1852-06-09 00:00:00

JUNE

Mr. YORKE—That is denied by Mr. Crattwell..
Sir B. HALL—It was' denied by Mr. Miller, hut stated by
Mr Cruttwell. But this was not the real question at issue.
The real question was, what ware they to do in these lament-
able circumstances? Ta his district thrre was a Protestant
clergyman who, although-performing Divine service its the
Church of England, attended a Roman Catholic place of
worship Sunday after Sutalay., A gentleman who saw hire
declared his readiness to emits° forv;atd and. verify the fact
that he crossed himself, made the various genuflexions, and
remained ,!uring thq whole time of service; that he went-
there again the following Sunday, and yet that mau
.per-
formed Divine service iu the church of St. Andrew's, '
street.;—(Cries of " Hear, hear.") It was said, why did
they not go into the ecclesiastical- court of Wells?
But would anybody, under such circumstances, go there,
when,the Bishop had just appointed his own son to preside
over it.. He believed. Mr. Bennett had been the means of •
converting many persons to the Church of Rome. Did the
Hon. Gentleman not know that, connected with the church
of St. Barnabas was a conventual establishment, and that
the daughter of a Right Hon. and Learned Gentleman, once
a Member of that House, was at the head of that establish-
ment—that the father of the lady had begged of Mr. Bennett •
to use his influence and endeavour to induce her to retrace
her steps ? And did he not know that that Rev. Gentle-
man, who was now the pastor of Frome, had refused to listen
to the prayers of the parent; and that the daughter, and all
the ladies associated with her, had gone over to the Church
of Rome.—(Hear, hear.) Did not Lord Colchester cite the
case of another lady where a similar result had taken place?
This man had been proved to have been trifling for some
time with Sir John Harrington; of whom they had hem
told by the Right Hon. Gentleman, the Member for the
University of Cbstord, that he had been justifies its leaving
the Church of England, b-ecause he had a congregation of
his own—

Mr. GLADSTONE said that he had distinctly contra-
dicted that statement before.

Sir B. HALL was not aware that the Right Hon. Gentle-
man had done so, or he would not have made the observa-
tion. He would'ask the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Glad-
stone) to say candidly what ought to be done under such
circumstances? Let the Bishops, who were the persons that
ought to be most desirous of reforming the ecclesiastical law
of the country, exert themselves in their places in the other
House of Parliament to effect this object. The Government
had intimated that even if they appointed a Commission to
inquire into this subject, the Bishops would not answer the
questions that would be put to them.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL—No, no.
Sir B. HALL—WeII, then, let them have a Committee,
and request the Bishops to appear before it, and if they then
refused to do so the responsibility would be on themselves.

Mr. E. YORKE wished to mike an observation in refer-
ence to the young lady who had been alluded to by the Hon.
Baronet. His impression was this, that the young lady her-
self was always restrained by Mr. Bennett from going her own
way to the Church of Rome.-(Laughter.) He thought
that his word was as good as that of the Hon. Baronet's.
The report then was, that the young lady had a'strong in-
clination to go to Rome, but was restrained, up to a certain.
point, by Mr. Bennett. But as soon as Mr. Bennett left St.
Barnabas she went to Rome.-(Hear and laughter.)
Mr. NEWDEGATE next rose, amid loud cries for a divi-
sion. He thanked the Hon. Member for Cockermouth for
the very able manner in which he had brought this subject.
under the notice of the House. Whatever might be the re•
suit of the division, he trusted that one good effect of bring.
ing forward the subject would be to lead to an alteration in
the state of the existing law, and he was anxious to hear
from her Majesty's Government whether they were prepared,
to consider the state of the law in the next session, and to in-
troduce some measure which would prevent men trcm hold-
ing benefices in the Church of England who had been con-
victed of unsound doctrines and the encouragement of Romish
practices.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said-This
mi
disssion, Sir, has tended very much to clear the case since
it was brought under the notice of the House. We have com-
pletely investigated the position of the Bishop of Bath and
Wells with respect to these circumstances, and I think I
do not misinterpret the general feelings of the House if I
describe it as one which would be extremely reluctant, by
any vote which it could arrive at, to throw any censure upon
the coaduct of that prelate.-(Hear. and cries ,of " Oh, oh.")
It meybe certainly very aa..y for Honourable Gentlemen to
sn per at that statement; but I think after a calm and ample
discusion, so ably conducted aS this bee been, we must ar-
rive at the conclusion .that however many of us may regret
the institution cf the individual who has become the vicar
of Frome, it is impossible for us to assert, by a vote of this
House, that it was the duty of the Bishop of that diocese to
prevent that institution ; nay more, I think that we have,
most of us, arrived at this conclu,ion, aut lied the Bishop
of the diocese thrown any difficulties in the way of the in-
stitution of Mr. B.:et-lett, be would have incurred very
perilous consequences.. In the 'present state of the law, I
think it quite impossible that the Howe should come .to
any vote which would in fact cast upon a Bishop of
_the
Church of England a condemeatiOn, simply because he has
done that Which all must admit to have been strictly his
legal duty, and which if be had not fulfilled would have
involved -WM in the most serious injure. .I consider
the questilin of the cendud of the Bi,hop of Bath
'and Walls to be perfectly dietinct,from those which have
occurred with respect to the preseat vicar of Frome.--
( Hear, hear.) Bat at the same time I cannot but remember
that it is only the Conduct' of the Bishop with which we have
to deal.-(Hear, hear.) When this question was first brought
under the notice of the House, I took the liberty of stating
with respect to the point of the ability which the parishtoners
of Frome should have of challenging the institution of one
who was to become their vicar, that if the state of the lawn did
not afford a remedy, then, I thought, it was our duty to
supply one. Generally speaking, that is a principle which I
think ought to guide as under these most painful circum-,
stances. I cannot think, with the lion. Gentleman the
Member for the city of Oxford, that there is no remedy for
the parishioners. I must still repeat, acting on the opinions
that have been given me, and confirmed by my own in-
quiries-.the opinion I have expressed before in this House,
that there is. a remedy for the parishioners of any living
placed under the circumstances in which the parishioners of
Frome are placed, and that that is a remedy for which they
need not go to any ecclesiastical court, or have recourse to any
ecclesiastical law. But I will not enter into that question again,
which we have before urged, because I am willing to admit
that.there is not sufficient facility or opportunity for parish-
ioners placed in the situation of those of Frome to obtain
that relief and redress which they have a right to expect.
But so far as the present motion is -concerned, it is really
the institution of Mr. Bennett into the vicarage-and that
is the act of the diocesan-which we are called on to inquire
into. I must repeat my opinion that the coneuct of the
Bishop of Bath and Wells cannot fairly be called in ques.
tion. But if we were to appoint a Committee, let the House
consider what will be the duties of that Committee. Their
duties would not be, I apprehend, to rake up evidence with
a view to institute proceedings against the Bishop. Well,
then, what is the duty of that Committee? Is it to be a
Committee to consider the state of the law? In my opinion
this is hardly the moment in
,which we should appoint a
Committee to consider the state of the law with respect to
the institution of persons into beneficies, and which cer-
tainly Ido not think a Committee of the House of Com-
mons the best instrument to carry on. with effect. I have
been asked by my Hon. Friend the Member for Warwick-
shire to give a pledge on the part of the Governmenf that
they will take into consideration that important subject, the
state of the law with respect to the institution to benefices. I
am sure my Hon.' Friend will not press me to gives pledge on
a subject of so grave and difficult a character. But that it is
a subject which must engage, sooner or later, the considera.
tion of any Government-that the state of our ecclesiastical
laws is one that cannot be much longer tolerated-(Loud
cheers) -and that with respect to the ecclesiastical courts, we
should follow the same course of temperate and efficient
reform which we have applied to all the other means of judi-
cature in the country-these, I think, are opinions which
few of us do not share, and certainly they are sentiments on
which the Government are prepared to act. I trust the
lion. Gentleman the Member for Cockermouth will not ask
the House to come to a decision on this motion. If indeed
he persists in so doing, although I myself most sincerely re-
gret much that has occurred at the vicarage of Frome, and
although 1 will not at this moment go out of my way to
offer any criticism on the conduct of other individuals con-
cerned) in these transactions, because I feel it is unneces-
sary to-night, especially when the conduct of one individual
alone is called in question-still, if the Hon. Gentleman
asks me to support this resolution to appoint a Committee to
investigate the conduct of the Bishop of Bath and Wells,
with respect to hiscompletion of an act which I do not think
he could have refused to fulfil, I shall feel it my duty to offer
a negative.-(Cheers.)
Mr. ELLICE said he saw all the difficulties of the case-
he saw all the objections to the appointment of a Select Corn-
mittee-(Llear, hear)-buf he could see no other remedy for
the grievance complained Of-(Elear, hear)-except an in-.
quiry--not-directid pershally against the conduct of the
Bishop of Bath and Wells, but into all the facts of the case,
in order to ground therein further proceedings with respect
to the state .of the law- (Clear) -which gave no relief to
parties complaining of, this grievance.- (Hear, hear.) Upon
this ground he should vete for the motion, seeing no other
meani of redress.-(liear, hear.)
Mr. MOODY thought that if an inquiry was instituted
into the occurrentes in London it would be trying Mr. Ben-
nett twice over. The question they had to deal with was
not an individual question, but was one as regarded the
Church at large. It appeared to him that there was a
very easy remedy in such Oases as the one complained of.
He thought a Commission might be,issued with reference to
what had taken place abroad, as well as to what had oc-
curred at home.- (Hear, bear.)
The SOLICITati-GENERAL said there was nothing in
the motion which impugned the conduct of Mr. Bennett.
-(heer, hear-)
It was for an
.inquiry into the dream-
stitution. and was directed entirely
against the Bishop stances *attending his il:1
of Bath and Wells.-(Hear, hear.) The
Bishop, however, in
the institution, had only done
.
what by law he was bound to do; and as far as he
was concerned, therefore, there was no ground for the in-
quill. Then as to the state of the.law some mieconception
existed, for if it wore proved that Mr. Bennett, by preache
teaching, by act or word, showed unsoundness of
ins or
doctrine, it .was coinpetent for the parishioners to put the
blue under the Church Discipline
law in motion .3glanst
Act_(ereer, hear.) -and even as to his past conduct
a commission could issue. in respect of
oanythilinegarsahiend
ro.;
done in this country within two ttwoofytehaers past.-st
Looking, however, to te ae practice oft
courts of,
Hear, hear)-to the practice of those courts,
the country-4
inetimes excessive-incurred in the
and the' exPeas"-
i assess proceedings-s°( Hear ,a hear )-a remedy.
hear.) It would be impossibwlesstoloeundtelyr
'called for.-(lleaf,
into that inquiry i
.now, but he hoped that the reform
which had taken p
the ecclesiastical
iaplacen our courts
ofthla wan d equ i t
would at the pr,oper time beeextended t o
courts -(silear.)
Dir. . D EDES
Ewxacsh
edisappointedo
tau
rt e tlhe
ge
salna stiwo ef
Chancellor of the
hear)-and the speech of the Solicit or-General as to the
state of the law, which had not encouraged any hope of
something being done to place it in a more satisfactory con-
dition,-(Bear, hear.). It was show's that the law was in-
accessible to individualseand that, therefore; something was
a done.--(Hear.) He regretted the 'state of
necessary
nhtiohb had been disclosed as to the position of the
thing' He was anxious to put an end to ' ; it,
Church- (fraxr•
and at the same time was anxious not to impute bl ame to
-(ilear.) But, as there was no hope,
uiustly.
he must, in order to promote
any pall},n "len of the law,
of any alteration
' SIDNEY HERB sT could nut express how strongly
this, object to vote for theEr motion.- (lleer.)
Mr. S
he we. s pained by the statements that had been made. He
was satisfied strictly that the question before them should be
looked into,
that members of the Church should have '
means of redress without the necessity of coming to that
which was not well suited 'for questions of the kind.
Hoitsiee,a7, hear.) The Bishop of Bath and Wells, it WAS clear,
could not have refused the induction, without risking an
action at law for his refusal.
wnIePOLE begged to be permitted to address one
word to the House in consequence of what had fallen from
the lion.
Member for West Kent (Mr. Deedes). That Lion.
Gentleman•
he thought, had entirely mistaken the reply of
his Light }Lin. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer, to
the appeal of the Hon. Member for Cockermauth. The in-
quiry would
the have been acceded to if it tad been put, as
suggested by Right Honourable Member for Coventry
(Mr. Walpole) reflected
(Hr. E. Ellice). Bust when he

9, 1852,

upon the speech of the Honourable Member for Cocker-
mouth, and .considered that the is. of the inquiry was
the conduct of the Bishop of Bath and Well that inquiry
*as to lead to a censure upon the conduct of the Bishop of
Bath and Wells, or to an impeachment on the part of some
Members of the House of Comnions agaiest that prelate,
and when it was notorious that the Bishop refusing ies,Pu-
i flan would have incurred the double proceeding of a writ of
4uare iinpedit and duplex qucerel, the proposition could not be
entertained. In the present state of the law the Bishop
-could not, have acted differently, and: under these circum
stances, he (Mr. Walpole) hoped the Hon. Member would
net ;press his motion to a division. If it was pressed, he
trusted the House would reject it, as lie considered it to be
both unreasonable and unjuet.
Mr. DEEDES explained that what he desired was a dis-
tinct declaration on the part of the Government that they
desired no alteration in the existing law.
Mr. GOIJLBURN thought it had been established that
the conduct of the Bishop of Bath and Wells ought not
te be impugned.
irroepnotesed
Feeling, therefore, that the inquiry
slahwou:hdenosthobueldia this particular case, but to the state of the
in-
quiry should be directed,
Bennett, but into the estate of the law attending the in-
stitution of clerks to benefices.—(Hear, hear.)
ansotaans atometnhdemiennstiituthtiaotn tohfe
Mr. HORSMAN, in reply, said he thought' he could tue
fwrioernddss.
fC
theirsetta Certain
proposedparties
that accused
sever the amendment of the Right Hon. Gentleman in three
there
sohf.oushould
murder,be ianntidu
iry certaininto
the state of the law with respect to capital punishment.
teexd p
toe or i
le
enacde dt
hMee.mllboeur
nfeoasr twthha.e3e,Universityfrom
se
—(Hear, hear, and laughter.) Such
w-
a
dofevCambridge iactht etmh ep
inquiry in which they were most interested, and to which
they at this moment seemed to be most inclined. It would
be making their proceedings perfectly ludicrous and ridi-
culous to adopt such a suggestion. - (Hear.) The motion con-
templated inquiry into the institution of the Rev. Mr. Bennett
and the conduct of all the parties implicated in the circum-
stances in question. A maxim in our law provided that
there should be no grievance without a remedy. A grievance
had been shown in this case, but where was the remedy?
While every one admitted the grievance, not one had sug-
gested a remedy. Wei the grievance to remain nnredressed,
or was the House of Commons still to say they would do no-
thing? He had brought this subject forward without having
any knowledge of the parties at Frome ; indeed, he had made
it a rule to take up no subject on merely local grounds. Ile
had selected it as a type of an abuse.

The House then divided, when there appeared
For the motion ... ... 156
Against it .. 111
Majority ... ... —45
MAYNOOTH.

Mr. BROTHERTON then moved the adjouttment of the
House.

Mr. OSWALD inquired when it was the intention of the
Member for North Warwickshire to bring on the adjourned
debate on the Maynooth grant?
Mr. SPOONEIt said he must refer thellon. Gentleman to
the resolution of the House. That would be decided when
the other orders were disposed of.
Mr. NEWDEGATE said it was his intention to take
the sense of the House on the question of the adjourn-
ment of the debate. It was now determined to defeat a
decision on that question by a factious opposition, but the
attempt of the Member for Salford to get rid of the
question would be frustrated, for he would take the
sense of the House on the question when the dropped order
for the resumption of the debate on the Maynooth grant
Caine Ott.

Mr. ANSTEY would be no party to a postponment of
the ileeision on the Mayncoth question, and he hoped the
Member for Salford wculd press his motion.
Mr. BROTIIERTON had no intention to get rid of the
question, but to get rid of the House.—(Laughter.) They
had been already sitting fourteen hours, and he was deter..
mined to pre,s his motion to a division.
Mr. HINDLEY thought the proposal of the Member for
Salford most reasonable, and he hoped the Government
would support the motion for the adjournment of the
House.

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he
,hout;ht the House had sat long enough.
The House then. adjourned at Halt-past One o'clock.

PARLIAMEN TA Ine DIVISIONS.

From the Votes and froeeeza4l;:. .;t' the House of Commons
TUESDAY. JUNE 8.
FROME VICARAGE.

Motion made, and Question proposed, " That a Select
Committee to appointed to inquire into the circumstances
connected with tho institution of the Reverend Mr. Bennett
to the Vicarage of Frome:"—Amendtnent proposed, to leave
out from the first word " the," to the end of the question, in
order to add the words " state. of the Law affecting the in-
stitution to Benefices," instead thereof :—Question put,
" That the words proposed to be left out stand part of the
Question." The House divide:l:

MAJORITY--AYES, 156.
A.hdy, Sir T. N. Edwards, Henry Moody, C. A.
Adair, B.A. Ellice, Edward Morris, David
Aglionby, H. A. Ellice, Edward,jun. Mostyn, E. M.
Alcoa, Thomas Ellis, John .
Noel, Gerald J.
lluntx, G. F.
Anstey, T. C.
Archdall, Captain EEliala.r°ti,jl4°'"lllinliEaM. •
Paget, Lord George
Arkwrifr,ht, G. Farnham, E. Parker, John
Armstrong, R. B. Forbes, Wm. Pechen, Sir G.
Bagge, William Forster, Matthew Pigott, Francis
Baines, M. T. . Fox, W. J. pintingten, JameS
Baird James Freestun, Colonel Pinney, William
Baldock, E. H. Frewen, C. H. Ricardo, John L.
Barrow, W. 11. Gesell, Charles Rice, E. R.
Bass, M. T. Glyn, George Carr Rich, Henry
Berkeley, Henry F. Goddard, A. L. Robartes. T. J. A.
Berkeley. C. L. G. Green, John .' Romilly, Col.
Bernal, Ralph Greene, Thomas Rushoat, Captain
Blackstone, W. S. Grenfell, C. Pascoe Salwey, Colonel
Booker, T. W. Gronfell, Charles W. Scholefield, W.
Moyle, Colonel Grey, R. W. &obeli, Captain
Bremridge,Richard Grosvenor, Lord R. Smith, J. A.
Bridges, Sir B. Hardcastle, J. A. Smyth, J. G.
Bright, John Harris, Richard Somerville, Sir W.
i Broadwood, H. nestle, Archibald Stanford, J. F.
Brockman. la- D.. 11.adinm, Tho....sa Eta..lon W. 0.
Brotherton, J. Henry, Alexander Stansfield, W. R. C.
Brown, H. Heywood, James Stanton, W H.
Buller, Sh J. Y. Heyworth, Lawrence Staunton, Sir G.
Butler, P. S. lllldyard, T. B. T. Strait, E.
Butt, Isaac 'Lindley, C. Stewart, Admiral
Buxton, Sir E. Hodgson, W. N. Stuart, Lord D.
Carter, Samuel Howard, C. W. G. Sutton, H. M.
Cavendish, C. C. Mitt, William Tenison, E. K.
Chaplin, W. J. Jackson, William Tennent, R. J.,
Childers, J. W. Kershaw, James Thompson, Colonel Clay, James ' King, P. J. Thompson, George
Clay, Sir W. Kinnaird, A. F. Tollemache, F. J.
Clifford, FlenrAM. Langston, J. H. Tolleinache, John
Cobden, Richard Laslett, William Townshend. Captain
Collins, William Lennard, T. B. Verner, Sir W.
Colvile, C. R.* Locke, Joseph Verney, . Sir H.
Copeland, Alderman Long, Walter Vivian, J. a.
Corry, H. L. Lowden, PrySe Walsh, Sir J.
Cowan, Charles M`Gregor, John Wethy, G. E.
Crowder, R. B. kV Taggart, Sir J. Williams, John
DWrymple, Captain Mangles. it. I). Williams, W.
Dawes, Edward Marshall, W. 'Wilson, Matthew
Dawson, T. V. Martin, J. Wortley, J. S.
D'Eynconrt, T. . Matheson, Colonel Wyld, James
Dod, J. W. Melgand, Viscount Wyvlll,•Marinadtike
Duff', James Milligan, Robert , TILLLER4.
Duncan, George Mitckell, T. A. Horsman, E.
Da3las, Sir David Moffatt, George Hall, Sir B.

MINORITY—NOES, 111.
Bailey' CrawhheY Gwyn, Bowel Portal," Melville
Bailey, Joseph Hamilton, G. A. Prime, Richard
Batllie, H. J. Heueage, G. It. Renton, John C.
Bankes G. Healey, J. W. ' ReptonoG. W.
Barrington, •Vis. Herbert, Henry A. Richards, Richard
Bell, Jacob Herries, J. 0. . Seymer, H. K.
Benbow, John Hervey, Lord A. Sibthorp, Colonel
Bennet, Philip Hope, Sir J. Sotheron, T. H. S.
Bolder.), George 11. . Hope. A. Spooner, R.
Bramston, T. W. Howard, E. G. Stafford, Augustus
Brooke, Lord Hudson, G. Stanley, Edward
Bruce, C. L. Johnstone, Sir J. Stanley, Lord
Cabbell, B. B. Jolliffe, Sir W. H. Stuart, John
Carew, W. H. Pole Jones, Captain Start, H. G.
Child, Smith Kelly, Sir F. Teunent, Sir J.
Christopher, It. Kildare, Marquis Thesiger, Sit F. •
Christy, Samuel • Knight, F..W, Thompson, Alderman
Clive, H. B. Knox, Colonel Trollops, Sir J.
Cocks, T. S. . Langton, W. H. Tyler, Sir G.
Collins, T. Legh, G. C. Tyrell, Sir J.
Cotton, W. S. _
ILeenwnioa3xa,mL,Orvdislcol.
tuasa.t
.vViilvillatersi: DiscountJ. E.
DDamavieers,,CDo.lAon.el
Littleton, E. R. Waddington, H. S.
Deedes, W. Lygon, General ' Walpole, Spencer
Disraeli. B.
Mackenzie, W. F. Walter, John
Buncombe, W. E.
Dunne, Colonel , PrOSSCr, F.
Manners,. Lord C. Watkins, Colonel
• Manners. Lord J. Wog--
Du Pre, C: G. Masterman, J. West, F. It.
Farrar, James illiles,'William Whiteside, James
Fellowes, Edward Morgan, 0. Wigram, Loftus
Fereison, Sir H. Mailings, J. R. Wodehousc. Edmund
Fikner, Sir E. .Naas, Lord Wood, Sir W. P.
Floyer, 'John Itewdegate, N. Wynn. 11. W.
Freshfield, J. W. .
Young, Sir John
Trrzr.as.
Gilpin, Colonel Packe, C. W.
Gladstone, W. E. Pakington, Sir J.
Greenall, G. Oswald;Alexander • Yorke, E. T.
Palmer, Roundel' •°album, Henry
Guernsey, Lord • Patten, J. W. Herbert, Sidney

TO THE SECRETARY OF THE BRILDFO
REFORM ASSOCIATION.

I am, Sir, yours eery sincerely,
.A.N OLD REFORMER.
Blackheath, Jane 9, 1852.

THE COUNTRY MARKETS.
IPSWICH, Jowl: 8.
We ccntinue to have the smallest show of wheat possible;
prices remain firm, and no disposition is shown by the sellers
to accept less ttan late figures. The showery and now very
forcing weather is questionable as regards benefit to the grow-
ing cropi.

PIR QUA RTY R. PER QUARTER.
Wheat, red - 32s to 00s
Ditto, white 4ss to 48s Oats oos to 00s
Barley, malting ... (10s to 00s Rye oos to 001
Ditto, grinding.... 00s to Ois Malt...—. . .. .„ OOB to 00s
Beans ...

AVERAGES FOR THE WXK ENDING JUNE 5, 1852.
Wheat
Barley
Beans, 67 „ 32s Od
Peas
Oats • „ 00s Od
HULL, JUNE S.

Messrs. Taylor and Bright's Circular states :—A good
deal of rain hes fallen at intervals during the past week—it was
much needed for spring corn and • grass, and has come too
late to prevent a light hay crop. The transactions of the past
week have been on a very limited scale, but each description of
spring corn has somewhat increased in value, with limited ar-
rivals and small stock in warehouse. We had a fair supply of
wheat from our own farmers, with very little foreign on show,
either from ship or granary. Fresh farmers' wheat was good
to sell at last week's rates, and more inquiry for foreign, with-
out however leading to niuch business. A retail sale for bar,
ley, as also a good consumptive demand for beans and peas• In
oats not much btisinesi passing. No alteration to be quoted,
but cakes are decidedly cheaper. Nothing doing in rapeseed,
but cakes go off readily at our quotations. Bones maintain
their value.

The following are the present prices of grain
E. 8.
Wheat, English, red 37 to 40
Do. white 4O 441
Dantzio and Ko-

S. ff
Peas, white and yd. 30 32
Do. grey 26 28
Linseed, Black Sea 44 46

nigsberg 4O 45
Pomeranian and
Hamburgh . 3B 40
Danish, Holstein, &
Friesland 36 38
Russian and Odessa 34 38
Oats, English
Do. Danish 16 18
Do. Friesians io lJ
Do. Russ. & Odessa 15 17
Barley, malting 2B
Do grinding
• 26 271

Do. Petersburgh ... 42 0
Do. Riga & Archngl. 38 42
Do. Konigsberg .... 36 40
Per ton.
Lins. c., Hull 71 lOs Od to 0101
Do. fine for. ...7i 5s Od to 0/0s
Do. inf. foreign... 0/ to 61 Os
Rapeseed 23/10s to 001
Kape cases...w2s tict to Vbs Od
Tares, English 37s —00 e
Do. foreign 32s —34 e
Guano 5l 71 to 91 10

Beaii.s
Do., foreign 26 26 Rye Meal 71 Os
CORK, Juxx 7.
-

Barrels. Currency.
O White wheat 001 Od to 00. Od 00s Od-20 stony
O Red wheat oos Od to 00s Od
0 Ditto ON Od to 00s Od } 00s Od-20 do
0 Ditto ON Od to 00s Cd
0 Barley 00s Od to 00s Od}
0 Ditto oos Od to ON Od 00a Od-00 do
0 Ditto Cos Od to ON Od
0 Bere . 00s Od to 001 Od N Cd
16 Oats 10. 6d to 121 Od
0 Ditto .... .. . oos Od to 00s Od 00s Od-0 de
0 Ditto ... oos Od to ON Od
ONs OO5 Oil to 00s Od 00s Od per owl
Quantity sold at the .Highest Prices
:-
0 barrels whits wheat; 0 red ; 00 barley; 0 bere; 11 oats;
0 pigs.
Quantity of Grain and Number of Pigs sold last week t...,
Wheat, 48. Barley, 35. Oats, 629. Pigs, 0.
PRICES OF BUTTER.
CAJIT. . CIIIMINCT..
... 63, Third quality ............... 54.
sFeireostngau quality
67s Second qua 'ty /.4. ...... 88,
.. .........
Ti
Third quality
Fourth quality
Fifth quality
Sixth quality
Return of Cattle sold for week ending May 29.
Pigs, 319. Sheep, 444. Cows, 88.
Collt.—Florx—Fast 12s 64 to 13s 6d ; extra 14s 6d;
s ocoLls, 10a 6d to 12s; households 95 to lOs 64 ; thirds, 75 tog,
per cwt. Oatmoal 11s to 1 ls 6d; Indian meal Es 3d to 8x94; wheat,.
meal, 946 d to lus Ed per cwt. Indian corn 815 s to 31108 per too
Bran 87s 6d to 90s per ton. Hay—Farmers 286 Od to 30a; avp,..„.. '
00s ; dealerB2St to 40s Od; average ON per ton. Stram . - —se
i•armere
lbs Od to 23. Cd, average 203: dealers 272 Od to 00, od ;
average ON Od per ton. Bread—Whesten leaf 6
bacon 6d to 7d ; sau"usa:ellds;d
household loaf bd to Od per 411). Freak butt:4l: to 04
103 per lb. Eggs-3s 44 to 3a 6d per hima...L,---, 8d to
Ltiempart 14: to ; Lydney 155 ; Land,„..--,, Coals—.
Bangor slat
—Beef 4id to 7d ; mutton 54 tr."..' gdlon. Mess
1. '66 per ton. Tallow Sgs od 4,..' 'jug ; Colin,
Fleece wool 14. to 15s per atone.
Whisky, 25 o. p., 52 9d p • •"' 394 per cwt.
er
muttony
Hemp 291 t 0341 per ton. Fish
7d ; pork 44 to Od ;
81 8s to 9/ Os per cwt.
Bark, red 71 to 8/ lOs per ton. es
2117,1 6d tc:11 310 s Poi tout.
pvee;1111. 4 ifloto
--.5‘G,,,,,„,
ditto, 24. to 005 per barrel ; N -- herrings 18s to 19.- red
ton. Timber—Memel, 70 "iblutdiaucl, 101 Os to li/ per
ditto, 21 15s per ton; dealser ton; red pine, 31 5, ; yellow
Market )6e to 241; s ' ' 151 to 181 per 100. Bides--
3d to Od per lh etted las to 24s per owe ; mil skins
- Pots
itki to I2d. Ottao, p.....t °ea, white 84 to 9d; pinkfl
to. el C 8 per toll. 'i "lan, 10! los to 114 lebab°44 '"
TAT--Archangel, 192 per barrel.

~- -
A MEMBER- O.FPA-RLIA.NIENT ASSAULTED
~.AFC_ OT ACES E
By MR. FEARGUS O'CONNOR.
The conduct of Mr. Feergus O'Connor in the Ilonie of ADVERTISEMENT ]
Commons last night-au account of which appears in our
AND TUB It oyAL
, the size oft,
Parliamentary report-regnuelreess#etbe
avery i coofnatarera„ laable, newly-invented, v___ ..n ....sverfal waistcoat
ery met
_kr'
person can be
p lia..pocket
on the Race-course, tiou of hi 4 relatives. On t ofdissolution glass
that the Speaker or the see
men tit is scarcely to be expected n and known li • a. wale answer every purpose
des distant • tbey House should take any further steps in relation to the Hoo. ' houses - country scenery
Member for Nottingham than may be required for keeping and ships . ,3 at the Opera-
they' are invaluable
'
him within something like bounds when he obtrudes f h ti
are cieariy seen at 12 to 14 miles; ,
or 8_00..11,, d
himself upon their deliberations. But his relatives Gentlerneu e. eer stalking, 3 fists.-
'l'o tearrielseeners and Tour 'To be had at Messrs.
ought really to have medical adVice npon his real S. and H. Sol ~ 'o'• • es 1)9, 1 et P Ainemar esstre . icca-
condition, as a glance at his recent proceedings will dilly, o • °Ea -' hotel.ucla 'T Telescopes-A new and most
PPQ;te the York e
possessing such extra-
show. First, the establishment' of that huge failure the importau Telescopes.Land Scheme, by which some thousands of hardworking ordinary t invention in
„iinebes. with an extra eye piece,
men were deprived of thousands of pounds; then a series of will show powers, that sosseer a
.t ,s Moons, Saturn's Ring, and the
offensive scenes before the Master in Chancery, when Mr. Double dietinctly, Jupei
same Telescope' weighing only
three
tars. With the
se's countenance 3iti miles distant,
O'Connor's conduct in relation to the Land Scheme was. ounce
under inquiry; next a discreditable assao in a theat , and as' c?.ri, be seen persons miles. They supersede every
followed by incarceration in the. Rouse of Correction're; other kind
object from 16 '
waistcoat pocket, and are of larger and all
then air exhibition of troublesome conduct in the Rouse - ' kind for
the. powers accordingly. Opera and Race-
sothen a sudden flight to the United States of
sizes, with incises; powers
wonderful powers; an object can be
by whf aglnlmorr.- A
miles distant. Messrs. S. and B.
course glasses,
sudden a return by. the steam-ship that took him; rut", , clearly seen from 14 16
invented invaluable preserving
greatly to the dismay of the paisengers; then a series or Solomons, Optici . have unseemly interruptions _of the jad • ges in the courts ' ediately they are placed before imper.•
, nem
and now, finally, an assault upon a Member of of law ; Spectacle Lenses
. strip of instances ag
the House feet vision,.evesri object appears clear and distinct, the most
Yghs beeomes bright and brilliant, is brought to
of Commons. Surely here is a sufficient site
pointing out why. Mr. O'Connor's relatives should ed defective # r _,
and original state. The Invisible measures calculated to secure his comfort, • take its
Y°
. Lid
all kinds of Acoustic instruments for relie
lie-
of others whilst th„ safety
and the progress of blic busines • e genic e d"'ness. 39'
- Albermarle-street, Piccadilly, op-
further interruption.-Daly
News. s is secured from
lie for a long posits the It or. .trite
The eccentricities of Mr. Feargas O'Connor
of
extur%etrhiothfural,,tner7e_no. 1
FADVERTISEMENT.]
• •
time past attracted a considerable share ofßsrry's delicious Food cures Indigestion,
public, attention. Da
Even before his departnre for America Ifconstipation, nervous debility, and nervous, bili-
an examin.. i l con aon that took place before ones of ther complaints, in all their varied forms; with
conduct during dyspepsia,
and live
Cbancery was of so outrageous a nature as t 1 Doss
.. la . cramps, acidity, he
his incarceration, bad he not been dealt with e have ilieed , 81)----s" &e.-Extract of a letter from the Rev. J. W. Fla-
ciful spirit. Since hie return to England his in a most mere- , is tre adaches, sickness, depression of
' 2- hi
ltidiington Rectory, Norfolk :-" Eight years' dyspepsia,
pear to be more deranged than mind would ap- : veil,
nervousness, and debility, with cramps, spasms, and nausea,
before. We find him at one eeryou #
had consulted the advice o? many, has
moment insulting all thelgueete •
•in the hotel, ' which my servant
drinking out of one naiu's glass, coffee-room of an for
effectually removed by Du Barry's delicious health-re-
the plate of another; text he turns
and helping himself from been effectually
food in a very short time. I shall be happy to ans-
hall, where he enters each of the puP
in Westinin's: a , swar any inquiries in canisters, suitably packed for
familiar conversation with the • de courts in turn,
belled- i all climates, and with full instructions-llb., 2s. 9d. ; 2lbs ,
dresses them in a vein of joculg Judges on the bench,
re and . 4s. 6d.; slbs , Ils.; 121 be. 225.; super-refined, Sibs., 225.;
place. Every action would
show
thatity ill-tuited to the
ot
aseession , 10Ibs. 335. The 10Ib. and 131 b. carriage free on receipt of
of his right mind. Upon anyother be was not in.hp
-mild long postso'ffice order. Barry Du Barry ape Co., 127, New Bond.
supposition be s since have, been locked . takes his street, London ; Fortnum, Mason, and Co., 182, Piccadilly ;
lace as Member of
p the Rouseof '
up. Again, when he
Commons Ivo find him be- . Hedges and Butler, 135, Regent-street; and all respectable
having himself in such the discus- grocers and chemists.
a manner as to ,itterrupt
slops and embarrass the House ' d list night, , 4
1 ADVERTISEMENT.] Holloway's Pills bn
. NI, hat occurre
ve been
however, can leave no doubt that the unfortunate genttrleman the means of curing another Sufferer from a Liver Complaint.
is a maniac. The particulars of his outrage upon S. r'eni -The wife of a respectable tradesman, residing • the
in neigh-
j im.in Hall, mad of the sc d in the House o
bourhood of Thrapstone, was suffe •
ene which occurre ring for more than two
Commons wi , 11 be found in Parliamentary report of this
ears from a severe liver complaint d • s urieg which period she
ourthis is
an isolated act. 3 ,
h b t cl. I •
day. It must not b is is received t e es me ica advice, but without deriving the
e supposed that th
has been the
Fur some tithe
past Mr. Fear as O'Connor .
slightest benefit therefrom. she then made trial of Rollo-
terror of the Hens% 4. •an of all persons who frequent the halls
moment he might waY -
's Pilla, and bv their use alone she has been restored to
and passages of the buiPing For the
perfect health ; die name of
was not done. the party cured is not made
have been placed in fe“ k e•pin ins;', but this
public, but Mrs. Collier
Even so, what w sa
''
e •ha him when the powers of bookseller, Thrapstone, can vouch
for the authenticity
as to be done Wit
of
the dissolution? of the case. Thse Pills were also an in-
the House sho ld h •
a , ave.exru-
pd by re:son
• a dangerous madman. 1 .
fallible remedy for indigestion,bilious headaches,and
attacks,
There can be no question that he is . . , all disorders of the stomach. qdruggists,and at
old all
Are w to o committed some serious
e wait until he shall have
by
r d
stablisliment, 244, area ,London.
crime before society takes precautions to preserve itself?-- ,
EDINBURCrt P.
Times. I - ,lAIR or MORAL PHILOSOPHY.....
....m.•••.M...•••••••••••••••••••=aft
• V Mr. Macdougall and Mr. Ferrier
were the candidates for the
rz. ---.Alunors•—Snape and Smitn .
THE HULL ....ARRoTit ' . ;vacant Professorship,final examination, and were
, were brought up yesterday for
{former by 20 votes against 13.
I Committed for the murder.

ti V re

ei - -I- (.
. n
, • Ak.,,,,,3/4 t,_
ThiA,,,
..4..
)
..s.vP,•••• 04 •-•)
, ~..,,..-,,?A,:1i...-_-..i,1
-........›...!......- - -
(CONTINUED ON MONDLYB AND WEDNESDAYS.) l'i`l4 'fr.4 ..--; 4t g 5.7
S:r,—C.i.Mtnoday the 7th of Jae°, the bli:i;a Bill
was :cad a third time, and a Clause added, extending ,
certain exemptions to the Uuiversities of -London and
Durt:em. A:nem:hi:lents directed to limit the powers of
tho Bill, were negativad by majorities of 187 to 142,
and 173 to 82. A pouition ha'l been ably taken up by
the Ggvernuat,nt, in making tae. application of a con-
sciipiion pataiisive and not obligatory; the effect of
which wee to divainish opposition by imaging the danger
more obscure. At the same time, the resistance to the
Bill has been wanting, in concentration and vigour; ex-
hibiting an inclination to be prepared with an answer to
constituents, rather than the steady adhesion of men
conscientiously desirous of falling in,the last ditch.
Oa Tuesday the House met at noon to proceed with
the question of Maynooth. After a few preliminary
speeches of no great length, an orator from Catholic
Ireland, as the Americana' say " occupied the floor,"
,
till the hand of the clock reached four, and the
i
debate died a natural death. Without following
him through his details, one thing, he proved, which
is sufficient to dispense with all the- rest; and that is
that the House is now called UPon to institute an in-
quiry, while there is all the time a legal method of
inquiry directed by Act of Parliament. Why is not
the House of Commons to institute an inquiry into the
cases which may be now in band at the Old Bailey,—or
into the more complicated mysteries pending in the Court
of Chancery? Simply because there is a legal appa-
ratus already for those very purposes,. and it would be
simple foolishness for the House of Commons to erect
itself into a new tribunal.
At sin came on Mr. Herman's motion for a Select
Committee to inquire into the circumstances connected
with the institution of the Rev. Mr. Bennett to the Vicarage
of Promo. Some strange points appear to be established.
It seems to be avowed, that a bishop is powerless for good,
and by
do abroad, can Among other things, it is declared that nothing a
consequence if be has any strength it is for evil.
lawyers in the
clergyman, can
by u, bishOp.- As an instance, it is virtually main-
tained by beatakcelenrcgoygnmanizancmesoyf
the Government, backed by all the
go to a Catholic country every winter if be can
cssthbaet
get there, may there mak„, the most ostentatious
displays of communion---- with the Church of Rome,
ending in getting himself ember of that
Church in the Almanac, or Directory, as
am
trectory, and may come
back to take his tithes i England without the pos-
sibility of interference in
To lea Tone doubt u
Y any ecclesiastical supe-
rior.is maintained that such s Pon the subject, it
himself to heavy P
ain4 and penzieerio.r would subject
interfere. For this, bishops s. if he attempted to
Some persons may be comforteficereththeir revenues.
ter things to come; from the Lint, that e hope
of bet-
motion was carried by 156 to 111. Here r I.l43"man's
gins the first chapter of the Re-refo • rmaitor. of
, perhaps,
of England. Hoglund. _ the Church