The Sun.
London, England, 1852-11-16 00:00:00

FUNERAL OF THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON.

NOTICE TO PERSONS IN THE PROCESSION.
The persons who are to attend in the Procession in
carriages numbered 1 to 41, will enter the Park by
Buckingham-gate or Storey's-gate, not later than eight
o'clock a.m., and , proceed (through the gate in the
railing near Storey's-gate) towards the Horse Guards,
and will there be directed to mourning coaches of cor-
responding numbers in the line formed in numerical
order in the open space and road.
All carriages and mourning coaches numbered 42 to
67, will enter by the Horse Guards, not later than eight
o'clock a.m., and turn to the right, towards the Admi-
ralty, and form in the numerical order indicated by the
card.

The carriages which precede, and those which follow,
,e funeral car will form in separate lines.

LAW INTELLIGENCE-(THIS DAY.)

QUEEN'S BENCH.

Before Lord Campbell, Mr. Justice Erle, and Mr.
Justice Crompton.)

THE QUEEN V. THE MIDLAND RAILWAY COMPANY.-JUDG

MEET.

This was a mandamus compelling the company to
construct a portion of a branch line between Market
Weighton and Cherry Burton, for which they had ob-
tained an Act of Parliament. The case was argued some

time ago at considerable length.
Mr. Justice Erie delivered his judgment this morning
in favour of the company.
Lord Campbell stated, at great length, his reasons for
disagreeing with his learned brother, and intimated that
Mr. Justice Crompton, who was then absent, had carefully
perused his (Lord Campbell's) judgment, and had autho-
ized him to say that he entirely concurred in it, believing
the prosecutors were entitled to the mandamus. The
company had obtained the act by representing that
the line Would be attended with local and public
advantages, and that they were ready to _ carry
it out, and they could not capriciously, or from
any interested motives, abandon the undertaking
and deprive ,the inhabitants in the district of the benefits
which Parliament intended to confer upon them. The
powers given to the company were clearly compulsory,
and must be fulfilled. The judgment of the Court would
be for tee prosecutors, and a peremptory mandamus
would be awarded to compel the construction of the line
in question.

THE QUEEN V. THE LANCASHIRE AND YORKSHIRE
RAILWAY.—JUDGMENT.
This was also a mandamus to compel the construction
of a portion of a line for which the Company had ob-
tained Parliamentary powers.
The Solicitor-General observed, that since the argu
went was heard, an Act of Parliament had been passed
relieving the Company from the liability to make the

Lord Campbell said the parties had taken the right
course in obtaining an Act, but it would be better for
fhe Court to pronounce judgment on the mandamus.
s Lordship, after going through the various points
n_rged
that jud
during the arguments, said he was of opinion
went ought also to be for the prosecutors in
this ease.
in that 011'1
Mr. j t•
lee Coleridge and the other judges concurring
Campbell
most award a peremptory mandp.
mus.
LOrd CP
most important case% that that these were two of the
Westminster Ran, and he thhad lately been decided in
y uld, with
ail possible iweed, be Ukenlbeforeta tigthiver twriobunal. i

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

HOUSE OF LORDS---(YESTERDAY.)
(Continued from our Third Edition of last evening
ACCOMMODATION IN ST. PAUL'S.

In reply to Sir J. SHELLY,
Lord J . MANNERS said, that 3,000 tickets had
been alloted to the Dean and Chapter of St. Paul's, but
those required by the Corporation had to be taken out of
that number. The Dean and Chapter had made
no application for tickets, and these had been offered to
them by the Government, they having made every effort
to consult the public convenience on the solemn occasion.
THE MOTION IN FAVOUR
.OF FREE TRADE.
Mr. HUME gave notice that he would move that the
House be " called" on Monday the 22d of this month.
(Hear, hear.)
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, it
would, perhaps, be convenient in that case that the Hon.
Member for Wolverhampton should state the terms of
the motion which he intended to make on that day.
(Cheers.)

WINE DUTIES.
In reply to Mr. OLIVEIRA,
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he
thought it would be acting ungraciously to the House to
state what alteration he intended to make in the wine
duties before he brought forward his financial measures.
(Hear, hear.)