The Sun.
London, England, 1864-02-09 00:00:00

performed, by others among the great contem-
porary comedians of Lord PALMERSTON. Very
full " Houses" might by this arrangement be
always secured by a comic Cabinet represented
upon the Treasury Bench let us say by Messrs.
CHARLES MATHEWS, BITCKSTONE, COMPTON,
TOOLE, SOTHERN, and PAUL BEDFORD. Lord
PAL:

.MERSTON even then being still allowed, if
he pleased, to play his own part to the life as
Master of the Revels—the Premier being per-
fectly competent " to hold his own," even if aeated
in the midst of such formidable rivals as caterers
for the popular amusement. Last evening was just
an illustration of the pertinacity with which, in
season and out of season, Lord PALMER-
STON is perpetually striving, not altogether
unsuccessfully, to put the house upon the
broad grin by his light-in-hand, touch-and-go,
manner of handling the reins of Government. The
hon. gentleman, the member for West Norfolk asks
very gravely and very reasonably a question
bearing upon Naval and Military matters at this
exceedingly critical juncture when war is actually
being waged against Denmark by the two
chief powers of Germany, the noble lord, the mem.
ber for Stamford, previously, asking another very
grave question, one more directly even than. that
of the member for West Norfolk, bearing upon
the momentous position of affairs, raider, in
Denmark. To neither of these questions could
Lord PALMERSTON vouchsafe a relay—and he
replied to them separately—without provoking
—(a laugh). Where the joke Fassibly can be
in the war, we can't see : and we certainly don't
feel in the least disposed to yir.tld precedence, or
priority, or anything of that kind, to anyone in the
instantaneous recognition of a joke, when there is
one in any way recognisable. But no—the fact of
the matter appears to be this: that the Premier
being dragged now deeper and deeper into the mire
by a cluster of either do-nothing or perversely
bungling colleagues, is heroically striving, as Lord
MELBOURNE did before him, to carry the doubtful
and occasionally perilous position off lightly, joy-
ously, airily—as though it were the best fun in the
world—with a laugh ! An ingenious device, but
one hardly decorous, and one in no way likely to
ast very much longer.

Once again has the Bench of England vindicated

its well-earned title to respect for its fearless up-
holding of the laws of the country. Yesterday the
all-important case of the Alexandra was again de-
cided against the Crown. In the Exchequer
Chamber the appeal from the Court of Exchequer
for a new trial was discharged upon technical

grounds—Sir HUGH CAIRNS having raised the

objection on Saturday that the Court had no juris-
diction. Yesterday morning judgment was given

discharging the rule for a new trial. Their lord-
ships were, however, divided in opinion. Lord

Chief Justice COCKBURN, and Justices CROMPTON
BLACKBURN, and MELLOR were opposed to grant.

ing a new trial, or rather held that they had no
jurisdiction ; while Lord Chief Justice ERLE, and
and Justices WILLIAMS and WILLES were in favour

of granting a new trial. It is not our object to

enter upon the legal merits of the case, because
whatever had been the decision of the Court, the
case must ultimately have gone to the House of

Lords. But it is satisfactory to hear the exponents

of our laws speaking out so boldly and earnestly as
they have done throughout this protracted trial.

Mr, Justice BLACKBURN, in stating his opinion,
observed that "he had to consider the objection
raised in a legal point of view, and deliver his

udgment as he thought the law warranted, with.

out consideration of what would be its effect and

consequent result." Lord Chief Justice COCKBURN

and others spoke to the same purport, all express

og their conviction that, as the case would be car

ried to the Lords, the interests of neither side
would be affected. We now, therefore, must wait

patiently until their lordships adjudicate upon the
matter. ' In the meanwhile, Mr. SEWARD is as

practically triumphant as if the Alexandra and the

other vessels whose fate is to be decided by that of
the Alexandra, had been condemned and confiscated

at the period of his first modest request. Who
shall hereafter be bold enough to assert that bluster
and insolence have now power with a British
Ministry ? The Alabama is said to have escaped
from Liverpool—at least so Mr. ADAMS was in-
formed ; but Lord PALMERSTON stated in the
House that he believed that if he had
stopped the Alabama the Government would
have been liable for damages. Earl RUSSELL also
considered that it was necessary to show that the
owners intended to employ in a hostile way the
ships before they can be legally seized. Why then,
but a short time afterwards, does his Lordship so
completely change his plan of action. Lord DERBY
furnished an answer in his speech in the House
of Lords last Thursday evening. He drew atten-
tion to the fact that Mr. SEWARD had forwarded a
despatch to the Ambassador of the United States in
London, in which it was stated that unless a stop
was put to the sale of vessels of the Alabama class
in this country, the result must be that the Federal
Government must take the law into their own
heads, that their cruisers would follow such vessels
into British ports, tied in British waters, to main-
tain their own interests. His lordship went on to
remark that he hoped Earl RUSSELL had answered
this dispatch in a manner which would put a atop
to such monstrous demands for the future. How-
ever the dispatch was received in this country in
the latter part of August last, and early in Septem
ber, the noble earl adopted the strong measure of
seizing the so-called Confederate rams in the
Mersey. The inference to be drawn from this
fact is obvious enough. Last year it was the
opinion of the legal advisers of the Crown that the
Government were not warranted in interfering, but
so soon as Mr. SEWARD writes a bullying letter, Earl
RUSSELL eats humble pie, and does the very same
thing which, but a short time ago, he pronounced
to be illegal. The Americans have no right to com•
plain, for our Government have gone further than
is sanctioned by the Supreme Court of Washington.
We have before us a small volume on the Foreign
Enlistment Acts of England and America,* in which
the various acts are clearly defined, and we find
that on orders to the collectors of customs at the
United States porta "they shall detain no vessels,
though manifestly intended for warlike purposes.
where the owners give security that they the
owners, do not intend using them in a manner
hostile to those at peace with the United States."
Well might Mr. SEWARD threaten to send Federal
cruisers into British waters to make reprisals
when the act had already been committed with
impunity. When a Federal cruiser may unques-
tioned sink an enemy's vessel within a few hun-
dred yards of British territory, as in the case of
the Margaret and Jessey among the Bahama
islands, and more recently the treatment of the
Anglo Saxon off the Cape of Good Hope—to
say nothing of the outrages daily committed upon
British ships on the high seas, which are too often
unjustly seized by the United States men-of-war,
to be as illegally condemned by the prize courts
of the United States—we trust that the case of
1 the Alexandra may be soon decided by the House
lof Lords ; for until this vexed question is defini-
tively settled the principle of English law is vir-
tually reversed, and instead of a men being deemed

* The Foreign Enlistment Acts of England and
America. By Yigilans. Saunders uud OL!ey.