The Sun.
London, England, 1864-07-29 00:00:00

A L

OPERA,

IT A I. I A N
Covent-garden.
Last Night but One.
Extra Night.
Mdile. Artot; Madame Didiee ; Signor Attri ; Signor
Gratiani; and Signor Mario.
HIS EVENING (Friday), July 29. will be performed
T
Goanod's opera, FAUST E Mar4herita,
Artor, her second appearance in that charo; acte
er Sie-
be , Madame Didiee ; Marta, 31.d11e. Anese ;
Mefist e,
nor Attri ; Valentino, Signor Gra ziani ; Wagner, bignor
Tagliallce ; and Faust, Signor Mario.
Conductor, Mr. Costa.
Commence at half-past 8 o'clock.
pit tickets, 7s. ; amphitheatre c,ta lsa, 10sicke. 6d., 7mas., y
and 55
had
.;
amphitheatre, 2s. 6d. Boxes, stalls, nd tickets be
at the box-office under the portico of the theatre, whiah is
open from ten till five, and at the principal musiosellers' and
librarians'.

ROYAL PRINCESS'S THEATRE.--
Sole Lessee and Manager, Mr. Geo. Vining.
Last 2 Nights of Mdße. Stella Colas.
THIS EVENING, BORN TO GOOD LUCK. Paddy
O'ltafferty, Mr. Dominick Murray.
After which. the new ri.ay by John Oxenford, Esq., THE
MONASTE ILY OF SC. J : Messrs. Vining, H. Mars-
ton, J. Nelson, J. W. Ray, H. Mellon, W. Robins, Seyton,
llispman ; Mrs. H. Maaton, and Mdlle. Stella kolas.

NeaW 'I'tiEATRE-Ito Y AL, ADELP ill.-
5015 Proprietor and Manazer. Mr. B. Webster.
THIS EVENING, THE FLOWERS OF TILE FOREST.
Messrs. J. L. Toole, P. Bedfors, Billington, Stuart, Stephen-
-
son, Romer; Miss Woolgar, Miss R. FLeily. and Mrs. Bil
lington.
At , ONE TOUCH OF NATURE. Penholder, Mr.
1.1)
Benjamin Webster ; Constance, Miss .11. Simms.
Followed by THE ARE BELLE, with a Norrible Tale:
A.
Messrs. J. L. Toole, P. Bedford, is.
Homer, Miss Woolgar, And
Mrs. H. Lewis.

Co
=nonce at 7.

ROYAL ST. JAMES'S THEATRE, under the
Management of Mr. B. WEBSTER.
Last three weeks of the present season.
. crowded with rank and fashion.
Re-engagement of those
s. ce
Charles ebraced popular artistes, Mr.
Mr M and
athews.
Production of an entirely new original Travestie of a very
popular subject, by FT. C. B. urnant, Esq., entitled FATJS
AeiD MAIWITERI E, in which Mr, and Mos Charles
„thews will appear. The new scenery by the celebrated
ai
artists, Messrs. Danson and Sons ; the incidental 134.1 et by
Oscar Byrne.
Amongst the artists engaged will be found the popular
/macs or Mr. Benjamin Webster, Mr. Charles Mathews. Mr.
Frank Matthews, Mr. J. L. Toole. Mr. J. Clarke, Mr. I' tut
Bedford, Mr. y. Robinson. Mr. Ashley Mr. J. Johnstone;
miss Herbert, Mrs. Frank !Matthews, Miss IL Simms, Miss
A. Cottrell, Miss Fanny Josephs, Miss Patti Josepus, Miss
Wentwortn,:Mrs. Stirring, and Mrs. Chas. Mathews. •
EVERY EVENING, at 7, A SHEEP IN WOLF'S
CLOTHING. Mrs. Stirling, Mr. J. Clarke, and Mr. F.
Robinson.
At a quarter-past 8, a new Travestie, entitled FAUST
AND MELEGUERITE : Mr. Chas. Mathews, Mr. J. Clarke,
Mr. Ashley, Mr. Montague, Mr. W. H. Eburne, Mr. W.
Chamberiaine, and Mrs, C. Mathews.
At 10, LITTLE TODDLEKINS, Mr. Charles Mathews,
Mr. and Mrs. F. Matthews.
To conclude with BRISTOL DIAMONDS. Mr. and Mrs.
Frank Mathews, Mr. Ash ey, Miss Wentworth.

GOODWOOM—RACE GLASSES, the best at
C.A.LLAGIIAN'S, 23A, New Bond-street, W., corner
of Conduit-street. N.B.—Sole agent to Voigtlander, Vienna.

OPERA and RACE GLASSES. Field and Yacht
Glasses, in every varle%y of size, form, and mounting,
matchless for their great magnifying power and sharpness
of definition. Price, from 30s. each, at CA LLAGRAN'S,
23A, New Bond-street, W., corner of Conduit-street. Sole
agent for the celebrated race and field glasses and photo-
graphic lenses made by Veigtlander, Vienna. Field glasses
made expressly tor India. warranted to withstand the greatest
tropical heat. The new aluminium mounted glasses (as re-
cently made for H.B.H. the Prince of Wales', though of the
largest size, weigh but a tew ounce/.

COUNTRY and SEASIDE DRESSES.
k) Messrs. JAY, of Regent-street, have now in stock a
variety of WASHLNG SILK DitEiSES, suitatle for the
country and seaside, and at the c.earing-out price of only
Xl.llB. 6d. the dress.

JAY'S,
247, 249, and 251, Regent-street.

BLACK SILKS.—The price of Silks in the raw
material has already r. sen 15 per cent, and it will soon
reach a far greater per-centage. Messrs. JAY, therefore,
invite their numerous patrons to take advantage of the stock
they have on hand, which they can now dispose of on favour-
able term the but the same qualities will naturally be. more
co.itly as price of silk fluctuates to a higher average
• JAY'S,
217, 219, and 251, Regent-street.

COALS.—The LILLESHALL COMPANY'S
COALS.
Direct from their own Collieries.
Marquis'. 235. per ton. I Double 20s. per ton.
Top • 225. .. Deep 2ls. „
Well screened and delivered within five miles of their De-
pots, Westbourne Park-road, W., and 17, South Wharf,
Zaddington, W., and Maiden-lane, N.
Best Coke lss. per elifildron.

Terms cash.
JOHN SCOTT, Sole Agent.

11 HE THIRD EDITION OF " THE SUN,"
I Containing the Latest SPORTING INTELLIGENCE,
had Every Evening of
G. it. GLENIE, NEWS AGENT,
No. 4, Connaught-terrace, Hyde-park.

THE JOINT-STOCK. DISCOUNT COMPANY
(Limited)
6 and 7, Nicholas-lane, Lombard-street, London, E.C.
Capital, £2,000,000.
Paid up, £400,00, of which L 374, 3231 s invested in Consols,

' DIRECTORS.
William Charles Brown, Esq.
J. Henry Reynell de Castro, Esq.
William Dent, Jun., Esq.
John Bloxam Elba, Esq,
John Fisher, Esq.
William Chapman Harnett, Esq.
Samuel Henry Hinde, Esq.
Francis Martin, Esq.
Henry White, Esq.
James Freeling Wilkinson, Esq. (Managing Director),
BANKERS.

The Bank of England.
Messrs. Glyn, Mills, and Co.' 67, Lombard-street,
The Agra and Masterman's Bank, 35, Nicholas lane.
The Consolidated Bank, 7, Fenchurch. street.
REPORT of the PROCEEDINGS at the SECOND
ORDINARY GENERAL MEETING of Shareholders,
held at the London Tavern, on THURSDAY, 28th July,
1364 ;
WILLIAM CHARLES BROWN, Esq., in the Chair.
The Secretary read the notice convening the meeting,
and the following report of the Directors and the statement
of accounts :
The Directors feel much pleasure in being able to present
a statement of accounts showing that the business of the
Company continues to make steady and most satisfactory
progress, and that a safe and profitable business has been
transacted.
The gross prcfitsmade during the six months ending the
30th ult. have been £72,9913s 4d. This amount, after de-
ducting £13,741 ids 4d for rebate on bills not due, and the
current expenses, has enabled the Directors to increase the
reserve fund to £25,000, and to declare a dividend at the
rate of eight per cent. per annum (free of income tax), pay-
able onand after Monday, the Ist of August next, leaving
a balance of £1,411 13s 9d to carry forward to profit and loss
new account.
The Directors desire to call attention to the following
facts. In April, 1363, soon after commencing business,
the amount of loans and deposits entrusted to the Com-
pany was about £1,000,000; at the close of the year the
a mount was £2,600,000; on the 30th June last, as the an-
nexed accounts show, it had augmented to nearly three
millions and a half.
As the extent of the Company's operations must in a
great measure be proportionate to the amount of deposits
and loans placed in its care, the Directors wish to observe
that the more the Shareholders and their friends become
depositors the greater will be the profits accruing to the
Company.

W. C. BROWN, Deputy-Chairman.
H. J. \VESTBUP, Secretary,

BALANCE SHEET, 30'rK JUNE, 1861.
DR.

To capita-80,000 shares, £5 paid .. £400,000 0 0
To reserve fund
To amount due on loans, deposits, dz., tic , 3,416,921 16 2
To amount carried to profitand loss account,
after making full allowance for bad and
doubtful debts

£3,907,901 7 1

Cu.
By investments in Consols and cash at
bankBrs
By bills diecounted, advances, £441,225 7 3
3,464,092 4 11
By k•ase, fixtures, furniture, Sce .
2,583 14 11

PROFIT AND LOSS L3'907'901 7 1
For the six months ending 30th June, 1864.
D.

To current expenses, including salaries, rent,
stationery, advertisements, directors' tees,
auditors' fees, depreciation in value of
lease, fixtures and furniture, income tax,
&c. ................................ £1,826 1 10
To rebate on bills discounted, not yet due.
carried to interest new account ........ 43,711 15 4
To dividend for the six months at the rate of
8 per cent. per annum ................ 16,000 0
To amount carried to reserve fund ........ 7,011 12 5
To balance carried to profit and loss new
1,411 13 9
account

£72,901 3 4

CR.
By balance of gross profits brought down £72,991 3 4
Examined and found correct, July 20. 1861.
W. B. FORD, 1 auditors,
J. P. JUDD,
It was moved by the CITAIRMAIst ; seconded by Wr. C.
ARXRTT, Esq.; and resolved unanimously :
" That the report or the Directors. and the statement of
accounts now submitted, be adopted."
It was tuned by 11.. RoBA.RTS, Esq. ; seconded by RIMED.
JAMES, Esq.; and resolved unanimously :
" That ties best thanks of the shareholders be given to the
Chairman and the Board of Directors,"
it was moved by RICHARD JAMES, Esq.; seconded by
A. MOSEN7AL, Esq. ; and resolved unanimously :
44 That a c0r0.i.,1 v,?treeef. thangs be given to Mr Wilkin-
son,e.or. the Mane
1)1
(Extracted from the Minutes.)
By order,

11. J. WESTRIJP, Secretary.
N.D. The Dividend 'Warrants will be sent by post to
each shareholder, and will be payable at the Agra and
liaatermall ' Bank 35, Nicholas-lane. Lombard-street.

BUSINESSES.-Mr. ANDREW HIND
has for
SALE—Cornehandlers_,' from £5O to £l,OOO ; Green_ I
1.,-rocers', £5O
to X 3 0 ; Coachbuilders', £5O to £7 •0 ; Confec-
t , °Eters'. Ch,misis' 3.l.lliners', Stationers', from .Cl 5 to £4OO ;
rovers', s,, from ,50
' to 1;2,00o • Cheesemonzers', £4O to £350;
I) rapers'..-EVO to £5,0e0 ; fLikers', £75 to £lOO ; Coffeehouses,
to £1:200; Dairies, &c., ,£do to £lO t; Oyster-rooms,
I:''staur`ffits• ll'e., £&, 10 £16,00 ;Shop Laundr le3, E5O to .:'-:,0; ;
Oil, Cigar, Fish, ham, and Toy
numerous other in every .Cs') to £3OO ; and
trade. Commercial and General
Agoncy Offices, corner of Little Carter-lane, St. PaUrO,

Tie July List, containing. 50,), gratis,

The Weather—Sun Office, July 29, 1864.

THERSIOMMTER.
This day at Two o'clock 7B
Barometer-29.90.
WIND —S.; moderate breeze, and cloudy.

HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE.
Fins DAY.—Morning, 10h. 35m.—Afternoon, 11h. lam.
fo.uounow.-Morning, 1112. 52m.—Afternoon, h. in.

-
'l4Z\

LONDON, FRIDAY, JULY 29, 1864,

_.----.....g,,...-----

The noble lord the member for Arundel may be
congratulated by men or all parties out of the House,
as he was at once very earnestly congratulated by
men of all parties in the House, for the really ad-
mirable speech delivered by him yesterday upon the
subject of Emigration to America. That speech of
Lord EDWD. HOWARD'S was immediately recognised
Its one of such conspicuous excellen e that, directly
after the close of it, the suggestion came from both
sides of the House of Commons that it should, out
of consideration for the public interests generally,
be circulated as widely as possible throughout the
United Kingdom. Even the stormy, fiery, redhot
Tory member for Devonport insisted upon it, that the
working classes of this country as well as of Ireland
must fed greatly indebted to the noble lord for the
able and important speech he had just delivered.
Mr. FERRAND adding thereupon that that speech
ought (as previously suggested by Mr. LAYARD)
to be circulated throughout the country. The
expense of doing so, said the hon. member, might
be great, nevertheless he (Mr. FERRAND) would ask
tha Government whether they had not some money
in their hands which could be usefully employed for
that purpose. For example, said the member for
Devonport, seriocomically as one might say, and in
the midst of mingled laughter and applause, for
example—the secret-service money ! Again,
in regard to this remarkable speech of
Lord EDWARD HOWARD'S—what said the Irish
Sccretary—what said Sir ROBERT PEEL ? Why,
nothing less than this—that the excellent, humane,
and charitable demonstration of the noble lord
would, he hoped, be productive of much good in
opening the eyes of the poor dupes I The
dupes, that is, of those emissaries from
Ame rica who are notoriously going about hither
and thither in this country, promoting in an
underhand manner the illegal cause of Federal
enlistment. The Under Secretary of State
for Foreign Affairs, however, was the
very first, as he was, everything considered,
the most earnest panegyrist of the veritable good
service done by the delivery of the noble lord's able
imp) essive exposition before the House of Commons,
his exposition (through the medium of his speech)
of the evils resulting from the continuance of this
systematic emigration to America, of men who are
really entrapped for the purposes of Federal Enlist-
ment. Mr. LAYARD yesterday did not simply con-
tent himself with expressing his opinion that
hie noble friend, the member for Lrundel, had done
good service by the able and impartial address he

just delivered to the House." He said—while re-
marking that it was a difficult question for the
Government to deal with—that "he (Mr.
LAYARD) did not know a better way of dealing with
this difficult question than by publishing
throughout the kingdom the important state-
ment just made by the noble lord. It was
impossible for the Government to deal with the matter
except by reiterating the warning of his noble friend,
and by doing all they could to instruct those who
were likely to cross the Atlantic in regard to the
real facts of the case and the dangers to which they
were likely to expose themselves." Than this
declaration on the part of the honourable gentle-
man the Under-Secretary of State for Foreign
Affairs, nothing surely could be more strikingly
eulogistic of the speech which had been just
previously delivered in the House of Commons,
the speech then so very freshly within the recollec-
tion of those who were listening to Mr. LAYARD'S
instant commentaries thereupon. While we would
express our very cordial concurrence in these well
deserved commendations of the remarkable speech
here referred to as having fallen from the lips of the
noble lord the member for Arundel, we would fain
urge upon those upon whom ought now to devolve
the duty of carrying out the wishes of the
House of Commons in regard to Lord EDWARD
HOWARD'S speech of yesterday—we would fain
urge upon them the necessity of at once carrying
out those wishes in earnest by causing to be
reprinted and very widely circulated an accurate
report of that excellent aLd impressive harangue.
The glorious uncertainty of the law—proverbial
in this country from time immemorial—has but
just now, as recently as yesterday, had a new and a
very striking illustration. Nominally, the YELVER-
TON Case was yesteeday brought to an end defi-
nitively. Referring though we do here to the deci-
sion thus pronounced upon this important case by
the highest court of judicature in the land, we use,

advisedly, the significant adverb, and we hesitate

not to reiterate the remark, that this decision of
the Law Lords is, after all, no more than nominally
(as contradistinguished from practically) conclu-
sive. The meaning of which, at first sight, in-
comprehensible assertion, is readily to be explained
by the circumstance that yet another proceeding
has been taken by Mrs. THERESA YELVERTON, nee
LONGWORTH, the consequence of which proceeding
on her part is quite effictually to prevent the
judgment which was pronounced yesterday by the
Law Lords, in the House of Peers, from being
made final in Scotland, until the parties to the
snit shall have been finally examined upon oath.
It will be observed that the decision pronounced in
favour of the petitioner, Major WILLIAM CIiZARLES
YELVERTON, has been simply the decision of a
majority—not by any means an unanimous decision
against the respondent. Ostensibly, the majority is
considerable. In reality, it is insignificant. Ap-
parently, it is a decision pronounced as by three to
one for the petitioner and against the respondent.
Literally it is a decision carried by the smallest of all
possible majorities—that of one. For, while three
of the law lords (all of them present) were yester.
day for the reversal of the judgment pronounced
by the lower Courts--were, in other words, in favour
of Major YELVERTON, and against Mrs. THERESA
YELVRTON nee LONGWORTII—two other of the
law lords (one present the other absent) were
as distinctly of a totally different opinion.
And, observe who they were that were for
the petitioner and who they were that were
for the respondent. For MajorYELvEnToN,against
Mrs. THERESA YELVERTON nee LONGWORTFI,
were—of these Law. Lords—whom ? Lord WENS-
LEYDALE I Lord KIN GSDOWN ! And Lord CHELMS-
FORD I Whereas, upon the other side, who, let it be
distinctly borne in mind, were the law lords who
pronounced (one by word of mouth, one by message)
just exactly otherwise ? Pronounced, that is, dis-
tinctly, deliberately, emphatically, in favour of Mrs.
THERESA YELVERTON Lee LONGWORTH and against
Major YELVERTON, the Petitioner ! Who were the
Law Lords who so thought, so decided ? no
others than— LordWEsmuitYand Lord BROUGHAM!
The latter, the most venerable and illustrious

among our group of ex-Chancellors—as he is also one it
of the most remarkable men of genius living—the
ex-Chancellor Lord BROUGHAM ! And—coincident
in opinion with Lord BROUGHAM in this matter—
speaking from the elevation appertaining to
the actual occupant of the Woolsack—the greatest
among all living Lawyers—Lord WESTBURY,
now the Lord High Chancellor ! These are the
two men whose judgments confirm the pre-
vious decisions pronounced in the lower
Courts in favour of the Respondent ! If the Peti-
tioner is backed by the favourable decision of Lord
WENSLEYDALE, of Lord h.rINGSDOWN, and of Lord
CHELMSFORD (reversing the judgments pronounced
pronounced against him by the lower Courts, here
in Scotland, there in Ireland)--the Respondent is
backed by the equally positive opinion in her favour
(confirmatory of those previous judgments) by Lord
WESTBURY and by Lord BROUGHAM! Altogether
the result arrived at, is about as unsatisfactory and
as bewildering of its kind, in regard to the
YELVERTON Case, as the decision arrived at the
close of the dispute in the old fable as to the precise
definition of the colour of the chameleon.

The withdrawal of the Mutual Surrender of Cri-
minals (Prussia) Bill will be received with general
satisfaction. It was not, indeed, probable that the
measure could ever have become law in the face of
so formidable an opposition as it excited, but Sir
GEORGE GREY has done wisely in refraining from
pressing the matter, and in acknowledging that in
this matter the popular representatives fairly repre-
sented the feelleg of the public. It is not surprising
that the House of Commons should look with some
suspicion on the terms of any treaty about to be
concluded between this country and Prussia. The
members of our Government have shown themselves
collectively and individually to stand in such
wholesome awe of the terrible M. BISMARK, to be
so easily influenced by his wishes, so readily pacified
by his explanations, so confiding in the general
high-mindedness and generosity of the King, Ca-
binet, and people of Berlin, that plain English
folks, whose views and principles will not adapt
themselves so promptly to foreign fashion, may
naturally be unwilling to leave too much to their
discretion. In the case which has lately been
brought under the notice of Parliament there is
especial reason for watchfulness. There is perhaps
none of the ruling principles of our political
code more generally received and more
readily acquiesced in by men of all shades of opi-
nion than that which affords unquestioning shelter
and unhesitating protection to the exile flying from
political or social persecution in his own country.
Englishmen pride themselves on the welcome which
they give to the unfortunate whether or no they
sympathise in the views or the actions which have
produced their misfortunes. Prince and peasant,
Orleanist and Bonapartist, slave-driver and slave,
are alike safe from the vengeance or the prejudice
of their countrymen so soon as they reach our shores;
and in the solitary exception to the national hospi-
tality which occurred in the case of Marshal HAY-
NAU, it must be remembered that he was no fugitive
driven from his country, but a favoured noble tak-
ing his ease while Hungarian homes were desolated
by his means. However much foreign Govern-
ments may dislike or distrust this our traditional
practice they may all feel thankful that they have
such an asylum in reserve, while Continental Sove-
reigns may learn a profitable lesson from the recol-
lection that the past and the present ruler of no less
a country than France have at different periods of

their lives been glad to avail themselves of an
English shelter. But with all our fervour of feel-
ing on this point we do not carry our views to
such an absurd extreme as to wish to harbour
criminals. If our colonists are unwilling to receive
English malefactors, under legal restraints and
with proper guardianship, we are certainly not in-
clined to have the villains of all nations let loose
upon us. We have criminals enough of our own if

we may judge from the disastrous record of the last
few weeks, and the sagacity or activity of our police
force is scarcely competent to keep pace with them.
It is by no means desirable that every law-breaker
of foreign states shall flee to England as a refuge
from offended justice. Neither can we be anxious
that our own offenders shall be able to secure im-
munity from punishment by escaping our shores.
With the immense traffic that is continually going
on it would be a serious thing if every felon who
could contrive to get beyond the immediate reach
of English jurisdiction were able to feel secure. It
would be felt on all hands to be a direful blow to
public security and public order if such a villain us
MULLER were able to elude chastisement because
he had crossed the Atlantic. A treaty of extradi-
tion then secures mutual interests and public rights.
The code of moral and social offences is happily much
the same throughout Christendom, and those offences
which are most fatal to life and happiness are, by
common consent, regarded with equal abhorrence,
and liable to much the same degree of punishment,
in most parts of Europe and America. But it is
very necessary to preserve a strict line of demarca-
tion between political and other offences, nor is
there any unfairness in our insisting upon mak-
ing the distinction clearly and unreservedly.
If we refuse to surrender political offenders to
their offended Governments, we also refrain from
making any similar demand upon them. Chartists
and democrats who have suoneded in stirring up
agitation in the United Kingdom have escaped
across the seas unpursued, and we are not likely to
trouble France or America with any appeals for
the surrender of a refractory citizen, or unpopular
statesman, or indiscreet man of letters. Our Go-
vernments have hitherto been careful to frame their
extradition treaties with especial regard to this
point, with one solitary exception, of which the
public were probably unaware until the recent dis-
cussion had disclosed the fact, that in the
terms of the treaty concluded with Denmark
two years ago, no such provision was made. If
such be the case, the Treaty needs an immediate
revision and alteration, but one such instance can
be no excuse for committing a still more serious
error. As the general law stands, an English
magistrate must be satisfied that there is evidence
against the accused party of having committed an
offence which is punishable by English law. This
is the great protection for all political offenders,

and our readers will readily recall a notable in-
stance of the action of this clause, when the sur-
render of the fugitive slave ANDERSON was refused
by the Canadian Judge, on the ground that the

offence with which he was charged was not recog-
nisable by English law. Bat notwithstanding the
general feeling on this matter, and the experience
of so many years, the Government has omitted any
such provision in the terms of the Convention
which it proposes to conclude with Prussia. It
binds us to surrender any person who has been
convicted, on receiving an authenticated copy of
his conviction. So that in place of receiving evi-
dence of the actual guilt of the accused, we are
merely to be told that the Prussian Government
holds him guilty. Considering how very
widely the notions of Berlin differ from
the English sentiments, such a security is
by no means sufficient. There is perhaps
no country in Europe in which Englishmen are just
now so little inclined to trust ; and when we re-
member bow easy it is to cite a person known to be

absent from the countr: before a Court at any given

time, and to pass julgment in default, we shall
certainly not be inclind to depart so far from our
old traditionary policy If such a treaty is to be
concluded with Austriewe shall probably soon hear
of a requisition to surrnder Kossmi and GARI-
BALDI if ever they cone in our way. A civil ex-
tradition in the case of the Italian hero has just
been forced upon us, it anly remains to follow it up
with a less courteous wtice to quit. It is certainly
an anachronism in our egal administration if felons
of any class or county' can claim sanctuary under
our laws; but while seeking to remedy such a state
of things, our legielatoa will do well to remember
that we are now govrned by the same Minister
who introduced the .Jen Bill, and that no con-
siderations of right, rcason, or justice are now suf-
fered to weigh in the Wanes against the prejudices
or requirements of Prussia.