The Sun.
London, England, 1864-11-14 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY EVENING, MWEMBER l4, 1864.

ACCOUNTS and BOOKS.—An experienced
and practical BOOK-KEEPER is desirous of an en-
gagement for a few hours daily, or otherwise. References of
respectability ; terms moderate. Address A. 8., 101, Strand.

VURNITURE, 'ARPETS, BEDDING, and
FLOORCLOTX, CARRIAGE-FREE to any house in
the kingdom, regardless of amount or distance. First• class
goods at second-class prices. Terms peculiarly liberal to
Clergymen and Gentlemen. An immense stock to select
from, displayed in Showrcoms occupying an acre of ground.
Every article warranted.
CLERGYMEN and GENTLEMEN ABOUT TO FUR-
NISH are respectfully informed that Messrs. Cobbett and
Co. are publishing an entirely New Edition of their un-
equalled MOUSE FURNISHING GUIDE, Illustrated by 410
adm ^able engravings of every description of Furniture and
Leasteads, with prices attached. A copy sent gratis and
post-free on application. This costly work also contains
complete estimates for furnishing on the following revised
scale :
A Six-roomed Parsonage £74 0
An Eight-roomed ditto
A Ten-roomed ditto ........
A Twelve-roomed ditto
together with a Price List of purified Bedding, and a mass
of valnable informationto all requiring househ3id furniture,
carpets, or bedding. References kindly permitted to Clergy-
men and gentlemen in or near Great Malvern, Southampton,
Chichester, Bury, Ely, Preston, Grimsby, Ryde, Plymouth,
Wells, Oxford, Brighton, Gainsborough, Margate. Kidder-
minster, Wellington, Croydon. Cambridge, Staines, Dorking,
St. Alban's, Worcester, Ipswich, Peterborough, St. David's,
Wrexham, and above 500 other places in all parts of Great
Brita.L.
COEBETT and CO.. General House Furnishers, Deptford-
bridge, London. S.E.

the report, and, adverting to the enormous price
that was paid by
the citizens for gas, he expressed
his opinion that if some comprehensive scheme were
adopted for disposing of the sewage, it would
yield sufficient to relieve the citizens from
the amount they paid for the article referred to.
(Hear.) He said he thought that it was very objec-
tionable to entrust such a matter to the hands of any
company, and the proper course to be taken was
to endeavour to induce the Government to interfere.
(Hear.)

. ,
Deputy ELLIOTT said that he also considered the
report and the resolution agreed to by the committee
were most satisfactory, as it was clear that they
knew too little of the subject at the preeent time to
justify them in coming to any conclusion. (Hear.)
He therefore thought that the committee had ar-
rived at a sound conclusion that it was not advisable

long going on in reference to the question would be
put an end to, but he thought this could only be
effected by having a Royal Commission.
The COMMON SERGEANT, who was appealed to in
the course of the debate, expressed his opinion that
it would not be prudent for the Corporation to ap-
ply to the Government to issue a Royal Commission,
as they Lad no power to control the scope of such a
commission, and the result might be to materially
affect the principle of local self-government.
Mr Lawley upon this withdrew his motion; and
another resolution, empowering the committee to
confer with the Government, and to take any other
steps they might deem advisable in the matter, was
agreed to, after which the Court adjourned,