The Sun.
London, England, 1864-06-21 00:00:00

GREAT EASTERN.

The scheme of the Great Northern consisted of a conneo-
tion between their loop line at Gainsberough with Doncas-
ter, so as to establish the route from Doncaster to Peter•
borough by the circuitous line via Lincoln, Boston, and
Spalding; and, secondly, by a system of single disjointed
loop lines, ostensibly destined for local accommodation, but
really devised in order to block up the district and prevent
the establishment of a superior direct through route. Taking
Cambridge as the common point of concentration to and
from the Great Eastern district, the distance to Doncaster
by the Great Northern loop line was 17 miles greater than
by the proposed line.

It was urged that the new lino would tend greatly to in-
crease the profit on the capital of £20,000,000 already ex-
cl.aat Eastern aratpnr, Tt nppaared that
the committee did not consider it fair towards the Great
Northern for the proposed line to a have a maximum fare of
one farthing per ton per mile, while the Great Northern
required a farthing and a half per ton per mile to pay them.
If the Great Northern had the same gradients, well and
good; but as they had not got them and could not get them,
except at a very large expense, the committee thought it
right to reject the Great Eastern Northern Junction Bill.
But, at the same time, the committee inserted facility clauses
in the Great Northern Bills with a view a view to enable
Great Eastern Company to run over the lines of the
Greet Northern Railway to Doncaster, if they thought pro-
per to do so. The directors state that no amount of facilities
could ever give to the Eastern Counties district the advan-
tages of a line 17 miles shorter, with flat gradients, neither
could any amount of facilities give to Central Lincolnshire
the advantage of having their district served by a grea
through line of railway. They also state that every one con-
versant with the working of railway traffic was well aware
that those facility clauses under such circumstances were
neither more nor less than "a mockery, a delusion, and a
snare." The directors could nat believe that Parliament
would finally refuse to sanction a scheme which offered to
the public the advantage of the best and cheapest trunk line
which had yet been devised between the North of England
on the one hand and the Eastern Counties and eastern dis-
tricts of the metropolis on the other.

PE RNA.SIbUCO.
The adjourned half-yearly meeting of this company was
held yesterday at the London Tavern, Mr it. Benson in the
chair.

The Secretary having read the notice of adjournmen
and also of en extraordinary meeting to be held immedi
ately afterwards,

The CMAIRMAN said the half-yearly meeting had been
adjourned to that day in the hope that something definite
in the meantime might Le received frora the Government
respecting the guarantee, but nothing had been received
from the Government in respect of the extension of the
guarantee. There had been two mails from Brazil since the
half-yearly meeting was held, and they had been informed
by their agent that the finance committee of the Chambers,
to whom the matter had been referred, had reported in
favour of the extension of the guarantee to the company,
and the question was now before the Chambers for their
sanction. He had therefore nothing further to communicate
about the extension of the guarantee, and he would proceed
with the extraordinary meeting, which had been convened
for the purpose of confirming certain alterations in the deed
of settlement which had been agreed to at the last meeting.
He then moved a formal resolution confirming the altera-
tions in the 92d clause of the deed of settlement from the
Ist of February and the let of August of each year, to the
30th of June and the 31st of December in each year, as the
dates in future for making up the accounts.
The motion was seconded.
The CHAIRMAN, in reply to a question, said they could
not pay any more interest until they got the money from
the Government, or until the Government gave them the
increased guarantee. The capital account was now closed,
and the directors could not pay the shareholders more than
they received.
Mr GOEI wished to know whether the guarantee was to
be extended in proportion to the increased outlay. He sup.
posed that the alteration of the dates for making up the ac-
counts and holding the future meetings of the company was
to enable the directors, before holding the meetings, to as-
certain the dividend due to the shareholders after paying
expenses, and to declare it accordingly.
The CHAIRMAN said that no amount had been finally
fixed, but the Government had agreed to recommend to the
Chambers that the guarantee should be extended to £85,000
a year. The matter had been investigated by four Govern-
ment officers, and the Minister had agreed to lay that
amount before the Chambers for its sanction. The Cham-
bers might reject the proposition or approve it, but the
Session would not close until the 7th Sept. next. The
alteration of the dates was, as the hon. proprietor supposed,
for the convenience of the company.
The resoluion was then unanimously adopted.
On the motion of the CHAIRMAN, seconded by Mr. GOBI,
a formal resolution confirming the repeal of the 38th clause
of the deed of settlement and authorising the ordinary
general meetings of the company to be held in future in
the months of April and October of each year was unani-
mously adopted.

In reply to a question, it was stated that one reason for
the dividend on the last occasion being only 2/ per cent.
was that the working expenses had exceeded the receipts,
but this was not likely to occur again.
The proceedings concluded with a vote of thanks to the
chairman aid directors.

A HINT TO VOLUNTEERS WHO ARE BENT UPON
GOING to COURT.—As there continues to be a belief that
gentlemen have a right to be presented at levees in virtue
of their being volunteer officers, we may state positively,
and from the best source of information, that no such right
exists. Volunteer officers must be eligible for presentation
for other reasons than their volunteer rank. The matter
was decided in the spring of 1800,—Court Journal.

The directors of this company have issued a statement to
ho shareholders respecting recent proceedings before a
committee of the House of Commons on the Great Eastern
Northern Junction Bill. The proposed line was intended
to start from the Great Eastern line near Cambridge in a
northern direction, passing near Peterborough, Bourn, Slea-
ford, Lincoln, Gainsborough, and Doncaster to Askern,
where it would form junctions with the Lancashire and
Yorkshire Railway, the North-Eastern system, with the
South Yorkshire coalfields, and with the new line from Don-
caster to Hull. It would also join the Midland Railway at
Peterborough, and the Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincoln
system at Lincoln, thus forming the most direct access to
the Eastern Counties, as well as a large and populous dis-
trict in the eastern part of the metropolis. The proposed
main line and branches were 134 miles in length, and the
total cost was estimated at £1,500,000, or less than £12,000
per mile. The gradients throughout were only lin 400,
being so favourable as to enable an engine to draw nearly
double the load that could be carried over the existing Great
Northern Railway between Doncaster and London---400
tons and upwards against 240 tons. It was proposed that
the new line should carry the 400 tons at a farthing per ton
per mile, while the rate on the Great Northern for a load of
240 tons was a farthing and a halt per ton per mile. The
proposed line would therefore earn 10d per mile at the re-
duced rate, or £6 Ils 8d per train on a distance of 176 miles,
more than would be earned by carrying only 240 tons in a
train at three-eighths of a penny per ton per mile. This
proposal would have reduced the cost of carriage upon coal
by is 4d per ton between Doncaster and the eastern part of
London, which was a wholly distinct district of the metro-
polis:from that which was reached by the Great Northern
at King's-cross, so that there could be no competition for
this traffic, as it would cost 2s per ton to bring the coal from
the Great Eastern district to that served by the Great
Northern, and vice versa. The advantage of cheap fuel
would therefore be entirely confined to the large district
served by the Great Eastern, effecting a reduction in the
price of coals to the consumer of 3s 4d per ton as com-
pared with the cost of being compelled to receive their coals
from King's-cross, The population of the eastern dis-
trict was estimated at 600,000 persons, and the probable
annual supply of coal by the Great Eastern at 1,000,000 tons.
The saving on this commodity alone would have been
£166,660 as compared with the same amount of coal carried
to the same district by the Great Northern route. The
statement also referred to the great advantages that would
be derived from the proposed direct communication between
the Great Eastern agricultural district, served by 600 miles
of railway, and the great railways in the manufacturing and
mining districts,