The Sun.
London, England, 1864-04-28 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS.

theatrical counseller to the committee, and it is by
following his advice that some of the most serious
obstacles have been surmounted. This fact was well
known to the chief of last night's audience. More-
ever, the excellent comedian did not wholly rely on
his reputation as a Shaksperean philanthropist.
He played Sir Andrew Aguecheek with fun even
more than usually exuberant, making a compound
of sot, zany, and poltroon that caused the wooden
walls of the Pavilion to reverberate with laughter.
Mr. Compton, who played the Clown with admira-
ble quaintness, was another leading favourite, being
known here not only through his London celebrity
but through a high reputation at Birmingham.
Malvolio was played with thoroughly sustained for-
mality by Mr. Chippendale, and was apparently a
more thankful part than it is usually found in Lon-
don, the practical joke of the " cross garters" being
immensely relished by the audience. Mr. Rogers as
the bluff besotted Sir Toby, and Mr. W. Farren as
the mischief-loving Fabian, were likewise excellent,
and nothing could go off with greater spirit than
the more broadly comic scene of the play—the duel
between Sir Andrew and Viola awakening a special
shout of mirth. Miss Louisa Angel, who played
Viola, was an object of general admiration, both on
account of her personal appearance and her sensible
inobtrusive style of acting ; and the celebrated lines,
" She never told her love, ike..," which had been sung
with Haydn's music the evening before, was duly
marked out by applause. Mr. Howe performed the
Duke with his wonted urbane dignity, and in the
uew building had an opportunity of proving the ex-
cellent quality of his voice. It is not too much to
say that his words, though uttered without effort,
were more discinct to the ear than those of any
other performer.

The character of Captain Howard Leslie,su stained
by Mr. Sothern in the afterpiece, is the first that he
essayed in London after establishing himself as
Lord Dundreary. It seems to exhibit him as an
excellent light comedian, and his coolness at the
beginning and his mock rhodomantade at the
end greatly delighted the Stratford audience.
This evening, to-morrow, and Friday he will play
Lord Dundreary at Birmingham, and will then re•
turn to London to appear at the Haymarket on
Saturday in a new piece entitled " David Garrick."
Miss Nelly Moore, known in London as a rising
young actress, distinguished herself greatly by the
spirit with which she played the self-willed and not
very scrupulous Mrs. Arundel.
This afternoon there was a dramatic recital in the
regular Stratford Theatre by Mrs. Macready, a lady
from the United States, who a few years back made
a favourable impression as a reader without book,
who by freedom of action and variation of voice
gives an almost histrionic representation of the playa
she recites. The audience, who nearly filled the little
theatre, now called the Shakspere Rooms, seemed
well gratified by the entertainment. The house it-
self, which stands on the site of the garden of New-
place, and of which such high expectations were
raised in 1827, is of itself worth a visit. It is very
small and low pitched, with two tiers of boxes—one
on the level of the pit, the other, though raised to
no great elevation, nearly reaching the ceiling.
Here were performed the plays that constituted a
portion of the entertainments of the Festival of 1830,
when Mr. Charles Kean was the principal actor, and
was generally looked upon as a rising young man.
At present it is in anything bat working condition,
as is amply proved by its deficiency in one detail,
generally considered necessary to theatrical repre-
sentation—viz., the stage.
With the two concerts on Monday, and with the
excursion to Charlecote, and the plays of yesterday,
I have been so occupied as to neglect the collec-
tion of works of art associated with Shakspere
which is exhibited all the week at the Town-hall,
and which when the value of many of the works
is known, will doubtless prove as attractive as
anything connected with the Festival. The core
?oration itself possesses an invaluable treasure in
the fe!l-length portrait of Garrick embracing a
bust of Sh!lksPere, painted by Gainsborough.
Then there is a .:Rrge assortment of Shaksperean
portraits of various degrees of authenticity, among
them the so-called " Jansen" ;with two others, not
at all like it, attributed to the same artist), the
"Lumley," the " Stratford," the " Droeshart,"
lithograph of the " Felton," and a drawing of the
" Chandos." To these may be added a copy of the
" Kesselstadt cast," which is now id the custody of
Professor Owen, and which is believed is some to
be the mask taken from the poet's face after death
for the sculptor or his bust. The discussion as to
the authorities in favour of these different portraits
forms a branch of erudition in itself ; but those who
would skim pleasantly through the subject I may
refer to a small handsomely illustrated book on the
" Life Portraits of Shakspere," written by Mr. J.
H. Friswell, who, however, does not touch the
" Lumley." The " Stratford" and the copy of the
"Felton" now exhibited at the Town-hall, both
belong to the Sbakspere Museum, to which they
were given by Mr. W. Oakley Hunt, the present
town clerk, who is highly respected as one of the
best Shaksperian antiquaries in this little Shak-
sperian world. "Of the "Keseelstadt cast" an ex-
cellent photograph has been taken by Mr. Nottage,
of the London Stereoscopic Society.
The picture owners have been very liberal in their
contributions to this exhibition. Her Majesty has
sent Sir T. Lawrence's well-known portrait of J. P.
Ketnble as Hamlet, to which Sir Joshua's Mrs. Sid-
dons as the Tragic Muse is a worthy pendant. Har-
lowe's great picture of the Kemble family engaged
in the trial of Queen Katherine is likewise here,
with three admirable works by Zoffany, lent by
Lord Carlisle— viz., the portraits of Foote as Major
Sturgeon, and of Garrick as Abel Drugger, and a
curious painting of three actors, supposed to
represent characters in Sir John Vanbrugh's
comedy, " Asop." Among the likenesses of
living artists is an admirable drawing of
Miss Helen Faucit by Burton, lent by Mr.
Theodore Martin. The pictures are nearly 300 in
number, comprising a quantity of ideal works in
addition to those of historical interest. Mr. Court-
ney, a carver of the town, has contributed to the
exhibition a "tercentenary table," a marvellous
piece of workmanship, in which six views, illustra-
tie g Shakepere's life, are inlaid in curiously coloured
woods. Messrs. Hunt and Roskell, too, have struck
a bronze medal, with a head of Shakspere surrounded
by the names of his plays on the obverse side, and
the apotheosis on the reverse, The testimonial pre-
sented to Mr, Ca cries Kean after his retirement
frem the Princess's stands in a conspicuous part of
one of the rooms, as well as Vechte's shield in
honour of Shakspere, Milton, and Newton, shown
at the International Exhibition of 1862.

Persons in debt may obtain instant protection against
imprisonment or seizure of their goods, and an entire release
from all debts and liabilities without publicity, by application
to Messrs. Marshall, solic.tors of the Court of Bankruptcy,
Charges under £5 payable by easy instalments. Offices—
(established 1830), 12, Hatton-garden. City branch-6, Moor-
gate-street, Bank.—ADvT.

ADVERTISEMENT.]. -Avoid medicines: they always aggra-
Tate chronic complaints, but Du Barry's Delicious Health
Restoring Revalenta Arabica Food, which saves fifty times
its cost in other remedies, invariably cures them, restoring
perfect digestion, strong nerves, sound lungs, healthy liver,
pure blood, refreshing sleep, functional regularity, and energy
to the most disordered or enfeebled. We extract a few out
of 60,000 Cures :—Cure No. 58,216 of the Marchioness de
Brehan, Paris, of a slyer complaint, wasting away for seven
years, debility, with a nervous palpitation all over, bad
digestion, constant sleeplessness, the most intolerable nervous
agitation, and dreadfully low spirited.—Cure No. 1.771. Lord
Stuart de Decies, Lord Lieut. of Waterford, of many years'
dyspepsia.—No. 49,832. "Fifty years' indescribable agony
from dyspepsia, nervousness, asthma, cough, constipation,
flatulency, spasms, sickness, and vomiting.—Maria Jolly."
—Cure No. 46,270. Mr. James Roberts, of Frimley, Surrey, of
thirty years' diseased lungs, spitting of blood, liver derange •
ment, and partial deafness.—Cure No. 47,121. Miss Elizabeth
Jacobs, of extreme nervousness, indigestion, gatherings, low
spirits, and nervous fancies.—Cure No. 54,616. The Rev. Jas.
T. Campbell, Fakenham, Norfolk, "of indigestion and torpi-
dity of the liver, which had resiste 1 all medical treatment."
In tins, 1 lb., 2s. 9d. ; 21b., 4s. 6d ; 51b., 11s. ; 421 b., 228. ; 241 b
IN.—Barry Du Barry and Co., No. 77, Regent-street, London;
also Fortnum and Mason ; and all Grocers and Chemists Lv
every town of the United Kingdom.

[ADVERTISEMENT.]—HoIIoway's Ointment and Pills.—
It is admitted by every one who has personally tried these
noble remedies for any eruptions, sores, ulcers, &c., or who
have witnessed their purifying and healing effects on
others suffering from such maladies that nothing more can
be desired than these medicaments possess. The Ointment
relaxes the swollen muscles, diminishes both redness and
inflammation, assuages pain, and alleviates even danger,
which may have lasted for months, or even years. Hollo-
way's excellent preparations are stated to be effective singly
—resistless in combination, and have been recommended
by grateful patients to bo sought as the alternatives when
all other means of regaining health have failed. Their
action is tomperate—not violent or reducing,

POST.—If an illustration of destroying by kind-
ness on the large scale were to be sought in the
records of colonisation, the blue-books, now multi-
farious, relating to New Zealand matters would go
far to supply it. When first the two magnificent
islands not appropriately called the Britain of the
South came under the regular dominion of this
country as members of the British colonial empire,
every desire was manifested to do absolute justice
between the Maories, often, but inappropriately,
termed " aborigines," and the invading race of
European settlers. Exeter Hall and the Aborigines
Protection Society had it all their own way in those
times with the Colonial-office, which latter was
influenced to put itself upon conscience with the
natives, to deal by them not merely in accordance
with certain abstract principles of justice, but with
certain developments of the abstraction, the result
of civilisation at home, and fixed government of
long duration. Herein lay the error—the prin-
ciples constituting the basis of legislation were
true and good enough, but the special application
of those who have exaggerated the very evils they
were intended to obviate. Hopes were held out to
the Maories, and promises were made, both clearly
incompatible with the relations which must needs
subsist between themselves and the colonial popu-
lation—hopes and promises that have resulted in a
chronic feud which, if not composed once and for
all, must lead to utter destruction of a very inte-
resting race of people now barely amounting to
50,000 souls. In taking a review of New Zealand
matters, from the stand-point of the doctrinaires
who instigated the Treaty of Waitangi, it is well
to understand and bear in mind, once for all, that
the Maories are no more the aborigines of New
Zealand than are the English and other Europeans
now settled there. In support of this come not
only their own traditions, but ethnological points
of similarity not to be mistaken. According to
their own records the Maories came from Hawai
in canoes about three hundred years ago; and
although the voyage seems long for that mode of
navigation, yet, when the absence of storms in the
Pacific is considered, and when, viewing the map of
the world, cognisance is taken of the islands and
islets, well-nigh innumerable, that stud the ocean
like stepping-stones across a fording-place, the
Maori tradition of their own exodus is in no way
improbable. It followe, then, that the Maories can
lay no claim to land title by prescriptive right of
occupation ab ortgine, which postulate once con-
ceded, the whole basis of assumption on which the
Treaty of Waitangi was established disintegrates
like a foundation of sand, and the whole super-
structure fells tottering. Perhaps it may not be
inexpedient here to indicate that the treaty to which
we have made reference is, in the annals of New
Zealand colonial history, comparable for importance
to what the Magna Charta is in the chronicles of
England. Its main characteristic was the affirma-
tion of a principle deduced from considerations of
abstract justice—the principle that lordship of the
soil, proprietorship of the land, should be recognised
as vested in the natives. As a corollary it was de-
creed that no land should be taken up, cultivated,
or otherwise appropriated, save under the condition
of voluntary sale by the rightful owner. Stripped
of all unnecessary mystification, and put in plain
language, such was the main principle affirmed by
the Treaty of Waitangi ; and it needs no deep
acquaintance with juridical science to see that a
stipulation of this sort could only take effect har-
moniously and satisfactorily under the condition of
the existence of a distinct land tenure well attested,
consecrated, so to speak, by time; recognised as
land tenure in England is recognised, and capable
of being placed in evidence whenever need should
arise, by what, for shortness sake, we may term
a Maori court of registration. Now, unfortunately
for the harmonious operation of the Waitangi
Treaty, the relationship of the Maori tribes to
the land of their islands was one of pretence and
pretence only. They were not an agricultural people
—they were not even pastoral. Farther to simplify
the case, they were not even a hunting people ;
and all this conceded, it is difficult to understand
how even—granting, for the sake of argument,
the aboriginal claim—the Maories could be held
constructively as lords of the soil, according to any
European jurisprudential notions. Admitting,
however, the theoretical propriety of the application
of principles laid down by the Treaty of Waitangi,
the futility of attempting to carry them into effect
will be made manifest by consideration of some
very strange pretensions which rule amongst the
Maories in reference to their land claims. Oae of
the strangest amongst these is what they call their
Law of Blood, the nature of which will be best set
forth by an illustration which we have on the au-
thority of a New Zealand blue-book. In one of
these publications it is recorded that a Maori, en-
tering a domicile belonging to another individual,
struck his head against the door-post, so that the
skin was broken and blood flowed. Thereupon the
visitor advanced a claim to proprietorship of the
house as having been the means of causing his
blood to flow; and in the blue-book wherein we
perused this statement testimony is made to the
fact that such pretension was wholly accordant with
a very ancient lex non scripta of the Maories. If,
!istead of a door-post, the visitor had fallen and
broken his head on the ground, then the whole
estate would have been constructively his; and thus
it is easy to see that, even without further cause of
embarrassment, this curious and fantastical blood
law would necessarily prevent any harmonious
working of conveyancing laws, the result of our
long-established government and more perfect civi-
lisation. For our part we see no hardship in the
policy of abrogating the Treaty of Waitangi, but a
real mercy to the natives. We should be well con-
tent to see the whole length and breadth of the two
New Zealand islands vested in the Colonial Go-
vernment, and redistributed according to the special
justice of each individual case. This done, there
would be what there never yet has been in New
Zealand—a safe and guaranteed title to land pos-
session ; and if a plea for action be deemed indis-
pensable, surely there is a very material one in the
argument perfectly well recognised in civilised
polity—that war abrogates treaties ; that, when
once the sword has been drawn, relations begin
de novo.

HERALD.—The corporation of Dublin has consti-
tuted itself the champion of Irish tenant right, and
the Lord Mayor of that city has, in full civic state,
presented a monster petition, said to be signed by
over 400,000 persons, at the bar of the Commons,
praying for legislation on this most important sub-
ject. The petition has been of course got up after
the usual fashion, each individual, young and old,
affixing his signature on issuing from the chapel
doors, where either the priest or some influential
agitator stands pen in hand to witness and urge on
the proceedings. Thus we have the urban popula-
tion bearing testimony to the " ills they know not
of," and the rural peasantry, naturally enough,
praying for some measure which would make them
virtually owners of the soil. We cannot but think
that the corporation of Dublin would have been
better employed in reducing the rates paid by the
inhabitants of that city than in squandering the
funds intrusted to their guardianship in bootless
and expensive visits to Landon. Their last state ex-
pedition, includirg the cost of their victory over
Edinburgh, entailed an expenditure of nearly £lOOO,
and no doubt the present appearance of the Dublin
functionaries at the bar of the house will be attended
with an outlay proportionate to their iueas of their
own dignity. There are many gentlemen of their
party in the Commons who could, and would, wil-
lingly have presented this petition, without expense
to the ratepayers of Dublin. If the corporators
suppose that their presence will give additional
weight to its prayer, we beg to assure them that
they form a very exaggerated opinion of their own
importance. The debate in the Dublin Common
Council, on the adoption of this petition, most for-
cibly verifies the truth of the old adage, "That the
cobbler should stick to his last." We believe that
the terr;torial possessions of tee very few members
of that very excitable body connected with land,
either as occupiers or owners, are of the most infi-
nitesimal proportions, and the peincipal speaker on
the occasion (Mr. Dillon) frankly admitted that,
personally, he knew nothing of the management
of estates or tenantry, his only object being to
obtain some measure which would render the
people comfortable and keep them at home. What
that measure should be, save that it must include
remuneration for outlay, he did not indicate. Now
Mr. Dillon must have been ignorant of the fact,
that there is already in existence an act of Parlia-
ment, called Cardwell's Act, from having been in■
troduced and passed by that gentleman when Secre-
tary for Ireland, by which an annuity of 7 per
cent. for 25 years is secured to the tenant on all out-
lay for the profitable improvement of his farm. If
such liberal terms of remuneration will not encou-
rage the Irish tenant to industry we should be glad
to know what more may be expected ? We can
easily believe that Mr. Dillon was ignorant of this
act when speaking; for it has become quite a dead
letter, and is no daubt altogether forgotten, not one
Irish tenant having taken advantage of its pro-
visions. Were the same advantages accorded to the
English tenant the results would have been very
different. Mr. Dillon has been singularly unfertu.
nate in his reference to the French tenantry. Before
he hazarded assertions which tell altogether against
his views he should have made himself acquainted
with the terms and tenures on which land is held in
France. It is true that the French peasantry are in
very large numbers proprietors of small portions of
the soil, but they are also almost invariably renters
of far more considerable farms than those they hold
in fee; and if Mr. Dillon or his friends wish to in-
troduce the French laws and customs regulating
the possession of land into Ireland, sure Nye are that

the Irish proprietors will not object. The longest
rt
lease ever granted in France is for seven years; ts°
usual tenures for three, six, or nine; both p
aie
having a reciprocal right to terminate the tenaUee9l
by giving six months' notice at the end of eith r
term. It is true the landlord keeps the boo!:
stead in repair, but as there are neither gati:.7
nor fences in the agricultural districts of Franc!
this costs him but little, while the tenant P3l*.
taxes on windows, fireplaces, doors, gateg, frau
which the Irish tenant is wholly exempt. The retnot
of the French tenant, which is, in proportion
quality of soil, at least 30 per cent. above the rep?
in Ireland, is paid the day it becomes due; if
the landlord summons the tenant before the justice
of the peace, who, the debt being proved, issues ant
order for his dispossession. If, after 14 days
grace accorded by law, the rent should still remain
s
due, the landlord proceeds to the premises with ,
policeman, the tenant and his family are taroea,
out, the furniture and stock are sold by auction, ant,
if any surplus remains it is handed to the tonic'.
and all further connection between the parties
ceases. Such a thing as an abatement in case et
bad crops is unknown—and it must be said, to the
credit of the French farmers, that eviction is seldom
had recourse to. The French tenant is perfectly
aware that his farm, on the expiration of his tenure',
will be let to the highest bidder, yet in the teeth e 4
short tenures, high rents, and strict landlords, he
thrives and becomes a proprietor, small thong') end
acquisition may be, solely by his industry. Inetei
of misleading the Irish peasantry by false state:
ments of their being born proprietors, would it no
be well if Mr. Dillon and his friends would much
them to industry, by showing them what the Freucli
peasant accomplishes under more adverse circulz:
stances than the Irish tenant is ever placed ill r,
When the agitators for tenant right assert 08:
Irish tenants are driven from their farms ilft,el;
having improved them, will they favour us Zvi
t,'"
some examples ? It must be easy to do so if the
cases be so numerous; one fact will have more
weight than a thousand assertions.