The Sun.
London, England, 1852-07-29 00:00:00

to be paid 2/. 2s. a sheet for the translation, which wculd
be guineas per volume.
Mr. Wingate, of the Established Church, by
Sergeant
MILLER—I resided for many years in Hun-
gary, and knew very well the father and mother of the
plaintiff. He was considered one of the most distin-
guished i citizens a Pesch. I have brought money and
letters to the plaintiff from his parents. I brought him
Tabhoeuit
° 2 v 6.
51. and a packet of letters from his mother. This was in
January of the present year.
Mr. Sergeant MILLER said that was his case.
Mr. MACA.UL&Y then submitted that his friend had not
proved the declaration.
The JUDGE said the charge against the defendants
was, that they had pile before a magistrate, and falsely
and maliciously, and without sufficient cause, induced
him to grant a warrant for the arrest of the plaintiff, for
having, by false pretences, obtained from George Daw-
son , there was no evidence of
what occurred before the magistrate previous to the
arrest; and in the depositions road there was no proof
that Mr. Tyndall undo any such charge againzt the
the sum of 243. Now
plaintiff, the woman Ywial'aladtever proved against Mr. Pey-
ouly said that he did not be-
howove , r who did say in his deposition that the plain-
Wevs3idenle a:tad:l76es: Mr. (D)nawl3:::
IttThereeffov.e at Idhw,aloat andebsenuaeio. Mecaldas.ofes 1:0 am,
whole case hinged upon the fact that the warrant was
somehial 243, on false pretences. The
obtained by the defendants falsely and maliciously, and
without sufficient cause, sweariag before a magistrate,
previous to toe issuing, of a warrant, that the plaintiff
oney
Dawson. There was no evidence, no ,aever, who it was
upon false pretences from Mr.
owaabdhtaaevileenhtehdsweet forth the fact produced. The deposi-
ocmrh3,
most
iande
utherehi ri
ywas n
takeno
before
or warrant ntth which
hi ch
ma-
gistratesthwt oo'ainu tsl
would
at the. hearing of the case against the pllinta,
were the depositions of witnesses, and as such did nut
render them liable to an action.
cSonel'ogi'natnly:
tMILLERdenIIr.
ce
suffi-
cient case proved for the decision of a jury.
aclietnhteenddeedcentdhaanttt:rarnedwaasevi
The JUDGE said, as there was evidence against Daw-
son, he would not stop the case, and it must therefore
proceed.. g
Mr. acauaav then rose and argued that in all the
points of the declaration, as affecting Mr. Dawson, proof
altogether failed, and that, even as regarded these, there
was no case for the jury.
Mr. Sergeant MILLER briefly replied.
The JUDGE, after stating his reasons for the decision
he was about to give, said it was very unfortunate, but,
if ho was wrong, he might be corrected. In his opinion,
the plaintiff must be called, The declaration, owing to
certain failures in evidence, and other irregularities, was
not established, and he could not allow a case to go to a
jury when there was no evidence. Let him, at the same
time; say, that he much regretted the result. Very
wrong and rash proceedings had been adopted by the
defendants; and, although the Baroness Von Beck might
have been wrong, of which he would say nothing, al-
though he was aisposed to think she was not, yet there
was no reasonable ground for supposing that this young
man, even if the baroness was an imposter, had been
guilty of the offence with which he had been charged.
As he (Baron Alderson) had said before, he regretted
the result of the present triaL
The plaintiff was accordingly nonsuited, but it was un-
derstood in cuart that the action will be renewed.

WESTERN CIRCUIT.—Exeter, July 27.
Mr. Baron MARTIN, in charging the grand jury for
the city of Exeter, observed that there was a ease of a
yeoman charged with concealing the birth of a child. So
many children had come to their deaths shortly after
birth, that the law had made such a concealinest an
offence. No doubt many infants were found concealed
who had been born alive. There had just been a case in
Dorsetshire, where, if the jury had not acquitted the
prisoner (and no doubt they
were right in so doing), he
would certainly have felt it his duty to have left the
woman for execution. In another case in the same
county the prisoner had been acquitted with perfect
propriety, because there bad not been the necessary
proof; but there could be no doubt a child of ten years
had been barbarously murdered by some One. A sort of
practice had sprung up of acquitting women on charges
of murder, and finding them guilty of concealing the
birth, for which a short term of imprisonment was
generally inflicted; but he much feared that the prac-
tice had led to the deaths of many children. He
was sorry to say that these cases were in-
creasing, and, although it would be extremely painful
to the judges, the consequence would be that some
women would be executed. It must not be tolerated that
young women who had brought upon themselves the
burden and shame of having children to support should
thus escape the burden. In the present case there wee
no evidence of the child having been born alive, and no
marks of violence Lad been found upon it; the cherge,
therefore, would only be that of concegling the birth;
.but
after what had occurred at Dorchester he considered
it his duty to state what would certainly be the result if
the offences should be continued to be committed.
Richard Baran was indicted for having, on the Teti of
July, wounded Henry Thomas Pratt, an infant of the
age of two years, with intent to murder it.
Mr. ',epee was counsel for the prosecution, and Mr.
Coleridge defended the prisoner.
It appeared that the child in question was the pri-
soner's child. The prisoner was a plumber and glazier.
On the 221 of July the prisoner was seen to go into
his house is a drunken state. Shortly afterwards
blows were heard tellowed by the cries of a child,
which, as the blows were repeated, became
fainter and fainter. When the prisoner went into
his house he had a stick in his hand. After the cries
were heard persons went into the house, end found the
child lying iu the cradle with blood oa it. There was
a small wound two inches above the right ear, there
was a bruise on the temple, another on the abdomen,
and the right thigh, and the lower part of the back unu
loins. At first there was danger, hut the child was now
recovering. There was blood ou the pillow iu the cradle.
Mr. COLEDIDGE urged to the jury that the man was
in such a state of intoxication that he could not have
had any intent at
Was in such a state of mind
that he was incapable of having any intent.
Me. Baron MARTIN summed up. It was necessary
under this indictment to find an intention in the men's
mind, but it did seem to Lisa that if the mare had any
mnoinLdnat h
could becaet.aaschnieldt tosotalv4:4elhoepurtivaend of all
all events, to do grievous bodily harm. A fierce animal
might destroy child, and it was for them to say
whether this man had not drunk to such an extent that
he was utterly deprived of all sense and mind, and was
not at all a humen being,
Tee jury found the prisoner Guilty of unlawfully
wounding.
The Learned JUDGE then told the prisoner if the jury
.
bad found guilty
the felony he would have left
hien for executtoe. The sentence now was that ho should
be imprisoned for two years and kept to hard labour.

POLICE, INTELLIGENCE.
II Onsiity
following, series of outrageous
-STREET.
Yesterday Mary Phillips
Mr. D'Eyncourt upon was placed at the bar before
the
assaults :
About four o'clock en ii,
married woman named le preceding afternoon a
ought
and unmerciful manner
a mechanic in Dunk-street, friary Ann=) Arnold, tho wife of
beating a child iii such auet, Mile-end, saw the prisoner
entreatedtphaas
st i she, i toldohae d rehdt Lorhdeserissei:
it
.:, h
The
thto be ashamed to do so, and
e prisoner flew late a violent
and, rushing upon her like the most foul-mouthed abuse,
severely about the head a'n( Prizefighter, beat her so
her eyes vet.° face with her fists that both
she finished by tearing shockingly,_r contused and swollen, aid
nisanuteiroear-rings out of the lobes of
had a second married woman,
in which the prisoner had
nhearmeeadrss.uselna
sthmeith,
who
for her protection, witnessed the cruel way
set upon the last witnese, in-
terposedprisoner, after at-
tilt: teeth into one of her hands,
at-
tacking her in a similar Ina:" the
with her nails, and fixing be-ner, scored her face down
bitpla eheerhesrosseelfveirnely; that the
of
woman was obliged to
which dressed. The prisoner then
iferkonmife, in a minute or two She
Hospital to have her wound's theA surgeons of the London
ra
u returnedinto
o
her head, and seemed dote,: which sho brandished over
through with it who came
onained to run everybody
third woman, named Cathe • within her reach. A
hre,irthboautstieb,
danger likely to result fromrine Hayes, who saw the
she Was manifestly under,
the vindictive feelings
to get behind her, and seized her
contrived
in the hope of wresting the her by the arms,
but the prisoner ws determined instrument from her,
and fought and struggled with s she should not do so,
such violence that in the
course of the contest betweQ, them the prisoner directed
the blade against the witne.s'a
rm
which she ialicted a serious stab, causing
near the elbow, in
flow in much profusion. Several „Causing the blood to
interposed to restrain her, und f the ntighbours now
fetch
stiblo of the H division, to take her ed Taylor, a con-
the prisoner was iu such an uticont into custody, but
re-
sisted with such strength and pntiorollabls rage, and
then only with the greatest difiSe„,,aeitY, that it was even
""Y that her apprehen-
sion was effected.
• When called upon for her defence, the prisoner stoutly
declared that she had no knifo whatever in her posse
sion, and called a witness named we i-
flings, a clothes
dealer ;,n, the neighbourhood, to depose
ho par ~ially did so, but having admitted, to the fact, and
tad, that
saw th 3 prsoner and the three complainants
en-
gaged in a violent contest, he did e_. k all
ginated, ,'''' new how it ori-
Mr. ) YEyNcounT, one of the complainants declining
to press the charge, convicted the prisoner the
assaultr i upon the two other women, and of violent
to pay penalties to the amount jointly of sentenced, her
de-
fault to ,stand committed to the House
~.4., or in
two In, inths; and, as the prisoner was
of uerre •
enable
Correction for
either to
Penalty, she was carried off to prison in pay
LAWETH. ln the van.
Yes' •
,erday, soon after Mr. Elliott had taken his
on the seat
bench, a young man of respectable c
residir ,
and whose
P,' in Hercuies-buildingF, Lambeth
.namesbefore
VI is given in confidence to our reporter,a attendedw"e
it),xtoore . 11, is worship to expose a nefarious system re
to liSip
Sly adopted by persons of questionable charactereentl
obtain
money from the unwary, under pretence of
placing t hem in good and lucrative situations at the '3
gold
diggings in Australia.
Pjic
ant stated that a few days ago he saw an adver-
tisement in one of the Sunday papers of extensiv •
latio e Caen.
Uas follows:
" Aunt ralia —A party required to go to
a corn •
The . . Australia for
valee,Phaa ty. appointment being of great trust and
must posetuai some property. Direct to A. F ,
98, der;
Hayin yn-stre,,,t, stating amount of means." F.
incl. 4.1 little money at his command, and feeling
matte nto proceed to Australia, he wrote to th an
per-
son ascot ding
e ', to the above address, and received
following the
answer, which was printed, and ou
had no perusal he
dt .übt his worship would come to th
cIUSi 1, ° "an 2con-
On st. at he had, that it was an attempt to obtain