The Sun.
London, England, 1852-01-28 00:00:00

MARKET NEWS.-(THIS DAY.)

CORN EXCHANGE—WEDNESDAY
The supply of Wheat on offer in to day's market was
„
Znusually small, and much out of condition. The at-
'Mance of millers was limited, neverthelers the de-
'nand for all kinds was on the increase. Owing, how-
ever, to the want of arrivals, the amount of business
Oring was trifling, yet some of the factors refused to sell
r forward delivery except at higher rates. Only 160
quarters of foreign Wheat have come to hand. Selected
qualities of Dantzic, ex-granary, were held for more
111(IneY, and we had an improved inquiry for low and
kiddling parcels. The show of Barley and Malt was
te,?raParatively small, whilst the trade ruled firm, at ex-
me quotations. Good sound Oats were the turn
higher, with a steady consumptive demand. No change
ruk place in Beans or Peas. Indian Corn and Flour
full; "'Ported Monday's advance. The nominal top
0.'013 of English was 43s per 2Solbs.

_
IA.RRIVAI:S THIS WEEK.
' I Wheat. Barley. Malt. ; Oats. Flour.
I...__ —
E4c,,,,.,
.. Qrs. Qrs. Qrs. 1 Qrs. Sacks.
41;7. •••• b9O 850 2,110 I 710 1,260
, " ....
'Orel 5,590
-...._ " "•••• 160 840

WiIIiTECBBPZ3L.
The supply of Meat on sale to-day was seasonably
Bova
log'swhilst the general d ruled ias •
from 2s 2d demand ruled inactive, as fol-
from 2s 2d to 3s 4d: Mutton nactive,,
2s 6d to
3s 10d; veal, 2s Id to 3s 10.1; Pork, 2s 6d to 3s Sd
Per Sibs by the carcase.
7307R0U GU 110 P IVLAMILT.
Our market continues firm, and lest wee Ek's prices are
Well supported.

XunEQUER.—(T HIS DAY.)
MILLER V
The ar 41.DERMAN SALOMONS,
_ gIIIIISOtS in this important and interesting case
tilf_ere resumed this morning before the Lord Chief Baron,
r. Baron Parke, Mr: Baron Alderson, and Mr. Baron
The Court was very much crowded the whole
1111,2rning, and there was a full attendance of the bar, the
"4°
°rthy alderman himself figuring amongst the gentle-
-4 of the long robe.
d Str
FITZROY KELLY continued his arguments for the
eenclant, and insisted at great length that the words
0 OQ the true faith of a Christian" formed no necessary
rp'sential part of the oath of abjuration.
lee; he arguments were still proceeding when our report
t " lid there was little prospect of the case closiug

BAIL COURT.—(THIS DAY.)
QUEEN V. BROWN.
)7,14 this case a rule had been obtained, calling upon Sir
nieeent Cotton, one of the justices of the county of
Zilitobridge, to show cause why the prisoner should not
Zoltdraitted to bail. The prisoner was accused of having
stu.°ll a hunting whip from the dog-cart of a university
uent, and the magistrates refusing bail, had committed
;one for trial at the next Cambridgeshire assizes. The
blllB,.cluance would be that he would have to be detained
forriBoll at least three months before he could get he-
ti e %jury, and as the prosecutor was inebriated at the
ti
the alleged felony was committed, he was not quite
nit. that he bad been robbed at all. He was, therefore,
te, Jueed to join in the present application to liberate the
:111_8011er on bail, and in his affidavit he stated that since
the night of the supposed felony he had ascertained that
e
prisoner was a highly respectable man, and the fore-
-..au
briA 9' an extensive brickmaking establishment in Cam-
-Zgeshire.
111,71%,WORLIDGE now appeared to show cause against
el: rule and read an affidavit from the constable who
b:elned the prisoner, alleging that the prosecutor had
h'ee Caoled into foregoing the prosecution. There was
defect. whatever in-the proof of the robbery, and the
-"toebitataitrates were all opposed to admitting the prisoner
„Mr• NAILOR, i
on the other hand, insisted that the
hT-rge rested upon a very slender foundation nd !f3d .
bo"e prisoner was highly respected in his own neigh
larh°ocl, and no one there believed him to be guilty.
Me. Justice ERLE said that was very possible. He
rjmembered a case in Somersetshire of burglary, where
non burglar was detected in the act and pursued by a
through In his attempt to escape he ran the constable
through with a sword, but he was ultimately traced to be
e churchwarden of the parish, who lived in the neigh-
u_ee.erhood for years, highly respected, and yet in his
llars were found e proceeds of at least a hundred
burglaries.
Mr. Nsu.on contended, however, that the guilt or in-
nocence of the accused had nothing to do with the ques-
tion; All the Court had to consider was whether or no
it was likely the prisoner would surrender if he were
admitted to bail.
Mr. Justice Eimu did not think he would, and d these circumstances no refused to make the
rule nub
(1.
lute.—Rule discharged accordingly. a So-

GUILD HALL.—(T HIS D AY.)
Thomas Charlesworth was charged before Sir Chap_
man Marshall with having received the sum of 131. 138.,
the property of his late master, Mr. Johnson, of Hud-
dersfield, without authority.
Mr. Wontner appeared for the complainant, and Mr.
Wood for the prisoner.
Mr. Johnston stated that he was in partnership with
otlyer persons for the sale of a smoke-consuming appa-
ratus, under a patent. With the object of carrying out
the business, he came to London in November last, and
accidentally met the prisoner in the street, when he re-
!Nested employment of some kind. The complainant
appointed him an agent, up to the 17th of January,
When he was discharged. On Tuesday, the 20th, he
When he
upon Messrs. Levi, Robson, and Franklin, printers,
°,l Great New-street, and presented an account for
'1'344 13s. for a smoke consuming apparatus which had
e"Pa erected by Mr. Johnsen, and he understood re-
aLved the money, for which he has never accounted.
Mr.h. Levi pat in the bill and receipt and proved the
Payment of the money by a cheque upon the bankers
of the firm.
Johnson being recalled stated that he had never
any authority to the poisoner to receive money on
6 account.
twThe prisoner was committed for trial, with bail of
th sureties of 50/. each, at twenty-four hours' notice of
validity of his sureties.
114.11:US. rri Irt T• y

-BRO'-STREE r-(THIS DA -
wALLxICED FRAITD.—Mr. William Grey Rex, of 3,
s,,,Y,adhara-place, and Billiter-squire, City, commission
Who was charged at this court yest ea 3 ut.
11, twining 41. 2s. from NI,. J. A. N?hitc, hatter, 19,
'Rent.street, and the particulars of whose examination
appeared in this journal last evening, attended to meet
44Y
..further evidence that might be offered against him.
04Ir. White said the defendant had paid him the
othneeY he had obtained from him, and us he had n 0
th_ r r charge against him (defendant), ho presumed
the wilts no further occasion for his attendance.
shall I•I4GRA3I—WeII, as you have got your money
discharge the defendant.
Discharged accordingty.

---•••••••• 77.7
of Mr' Wegg Prosser Las announced to the electors
:Ilithe county of Hereford that it is not his intention to
himself again as one of their representatives. The ilon9
n.
les S B Hanbury, a Younger brother of Lord Batetua has determined, it is said, to come forward on prot aeti
.
luag Protootant principles.