The Sun.
London, England, 1864-09-01 00:00:00

MEMBER'S PLATE.

Roulette_ 1
Stygne

THIRD EDITION

SUN OFFICE, SEVEN O'CLOCK.

The Explosion on the North London
Railway.

Dr Lankester resumed the adjourned inquest on the body
of the stoker, whose death was occasioned by the explosion
of the locomotive engine on the North London Railway.
The jury having inspected the wreck of the locomotive
at the company's works, at Bow, _ _ _

.. ..
Captain Tyler, of the Board of Trade, was examined at
great length, the effect of his evidence being that the ex-
plosion was owing to a weakening in the bolts and stays of
the engine.

In answer to Mr Sleigh, who appeared for the company,
Capt. Tyler said it was impossible by visible inspection to
detect the defects in the stays of the engine which caused
the accident, except there were either leakage or bulging.
The Coroner said the jury would now deliberate on their
verdict. They would of course consider whether there
had been any laxity of inspection, and if they should be of
that opinion they would of course say so. Captain Tyler
had said that it would be impossible by visible inspection
to detect the defect that caused the accident; but if the
jury thought that there should be more attention paid to
the examination of the state of the locomotives they could
express that opinion in their verdict. No criminal act
had been committed, as no law had been broken ; but it
there had been an act stating that a certain thing should
be done, and the provisions of the act had not
been complied with, than there could be a
verdict of manslaughter returned against some party; as
it was, such was not the case. He felt certain that any re-
commendation the jury might feel it their duty to attach to
their verdict would be given the greatest consideration to
by the London Railway Company.
The jury then retired to consider their verdict, and after
an absence of about 40 minutes returned to the inquest
room.

The Foreman read the verdict, which began by stating
that Davis met with his death in con& game of the ex-
plosion of the fire box of No. 6 engine. _

- The Coroner—That is accidental death.
Several persons exclaimed, " No, no," and one said,
" The foreman has the report, and ho ought not to be in-
terrupted." _ _ _

The Coroner—That must be loft to me.
Tho Foreman added that in the opinion of the jury the
rivet-heads ought to have been more frequently examined,
when there were such evident signs of weakness.
Tao coroner—Then your verdict is accidental death,
with recoOmendations to be sent to the directors.
Several gb.ntlemen said the word "accidental" was not
in the verdict.

The Coroner— You don't say it was not accidental
surely. . .

A Juror—We purposely leave that an open question.

. .
The Coroner—The det.th must have been natural, acci-
dental, or violent, What tie you say it was ?
A Jnror—We say nothing about it. We purposely left
it open, in order that, it pressed upon us, we might retire to
reconsider the matter. _ .

The Coroner—You had better retire and bring in a ver-
dict of manslaughter against the company.
Mr 61eigh said, perhaps the jury would pardon him, but
what he supposed they intended to convey was that there
was no evidence to of blame to any particular indi-
vidual.a verdict of accidental death,
A Juror—lf we bring in
are the company liablo for the consequences.
Coroner—Yes, certainly. The company will be civilly
responsible.
A Juror—l don't see how we can come to the conclusion
that the death was accidental, when we are of opinion that
it arose from the neglect of proper care.
The Coroner said ho was only anxious that a verdict
should be returned which would be effective. He thought
it best the jury should return such a verdict as would en-
able a jury to convict, and not one upon which they must
acquit.
A Juror—Before we again leave this room I should like
to know whether we are bound to return either a verdict of
accidental death or manslaughter ?
The Coroner—Yes, you must one or the other, and name
the parties whom you consider responsible.
A Juror—l think we ought to be bound by Johnson's
Dictionary. What is his meaning of the word " Acci-
dent ?''

The Coroner—That may do very well, but in this:country
we go by common sense.
The jury then again retired,and after a short absence re-
turned to the inquest loom, when
The Coroner asked if they were agreed ?
The Foreman said their verdict was, that the death of
the man William Davis arose from fracture of the base of
the skull, and that that fracture was caused by the explo-
sion of No. 6 engine on the North London Railway on the
16th of August last, and also that the death arose from
mi 3a dventure.

The jury appended two resolutions to their verdict, one
specifying that there had not been proper care in the eaa••
urination of the locomotive, and the other that some more
effectual steps be taken for the future.
The Coroner, foreman, and jurors then signed the ver-
dict and resolutions, and a copy was ordered to be trans-
mitted to the directors of the North London Railway Com-
pany.
The proceedings then terminatel.