The Sun.
London, England, 1852-07-01 00:00:00

Blyth and Tyne Railway.
Kingston and Sheetbridge Roads.
Belfast Harbour.
Monmouthshire Railway sad Canal.
Kingston-upon-Hull Dues and Docks.
Claussen's Patent Flax Company.
Great Western Railway (No. 1.)
Frome, Yeovil, and Weymouth Railway (No. 1).
Liskeard Roads.
Manchester, Sheffield. and Lincolnshire Railway (No. 2).
Stockton and Hartlepool and Clarence Railway, and
Hartlepool West Harbour and Dock Companies.
Cork Improvement.
Asthall and Buckland Road.
Shrewsbury and Chester Railway.
Cambridge to Ely and other Roads.
York and North Midland Railway.
North British Flax Company (Claussen's Patent).
Great Western Railway (No, 2).
North-Western Railway.
Eastern Union Railway.
Wycombe Railway.
Wedmore Road.
Nene Valley Drainage and Navigation Improvement.
London Necropolis and National Mausoleum.
Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway.
Humber Conservancy and Kingston-upon-Hull Docks.
Oxford, Worcester, and Wolverhampton Railway (No. 1).
TorquaY Extra-mural Cemetery.
Midland Great Western Railway of Ireland.
Torquay Market and Slaughter-houses.
Exeter Roads.
Commercial Gas Company and British Gas Light

Company.
South Yorkshire Railway and River Dun Company
(Sale or Lease, &c.)
New River Company (to improve the Supply of
Water, &e.)
Chelsea Waterworks.
Southwark and Vauxhall Water Company.
Wexford Harbour Improvement (No. 1).
Wexford Harbour Improvement (No. 2).
Tees Conservancy.
West Middlesex Waterworks.
Grand Junction Waterworks Company.
East London Waterworks (Amendment of Ante, &c.)
Swansea Local Board of Health.
Wirksworth Mining Customs and Mineral Courts.
Leith Exchange Buildings.
Magdalen College (Oxford) Estate.
Aberdeen Hammermen Incorporation.
Gedling's Estate.
Earl of Purtarlington's Estate.
Elwes' Estate.
Fleming's Este.e.
Howfdl's Charity.
Adams's Estate.
Jarvis's Charity Estate.
Mill's Estate.
Spalding's Estate.
Thornhill s Estate.
Aberdeen Boys' and Girls' Hospitals.
Hawkins's Divorce.
The Lords Commissioners were the Lord Chancellor,
the Marquis of Salisbury, and Lord Monteagle.
retired, the Lord Chancellor took
The Speaker having
his seat on the Woolsack.
CONSOLIDATED FUND APPROPRIATION BILL.
On the motion for the third reading of this Bill,
Lord BROUGHAM took occasion to point out the
inquiries which he thought the Committee appointed to
investigate the working of the county courts ought to
pursue. The Noble Lord repeated the euloginno which
he had passed last night on the system, and also ad-
verted to the efforts which have been made for a revision
of the criminal code. He suggested th© Commission to
inquire should be based on the Chancery Commission.
After a few words from the Marquis of SALISBURY,
the Bill was read a third time and passed.
Their Lordships then adjourned during pleasure.

The House resumed at a Quarter to Four, and a mes-
sage was received from the House of Commons, inform-
ing their Lordships that the Commons disagreed to the
Lords' amendment on the Improvement of the Jurisdic-
tion in Equity Bill.
Lord COLCHESTER moved that their Lordships do
not persist in their amendment, which was agreed to.
Several other messages were received, and their Lord-
ships adjourned at Four o'clock.

HOUSE OF COMMONS, June 30.

IMPROVEMENT OF THE
EQUITY BILL JURISDICTION OF

The Lords' amenduients to this Bill were considered.
Mr. WALPOLE moved that the House do disagree
with the Lords' amendment which proposed to strike
out clause E.
Mr. BETHELL seconded the motion.
Sir W. P. WOOD took the opportunity of this dis-
cussion to complain of the conduct of the Lord Chan-
miler in imputing to his Right Hon. Friend the Master
of the Rolls sinister motives with reference to the Relief
of Suitors in Chancery Bill. There was no foundation
whatever for such imputations, and he wasiiorry they
had ever been made.
ROYAL COMMISSION.

The Yeoman Usher of the Black Rod here appeared
at the table and summoned the House to attend at the
bar of the House of Lords, to hear the Royal assent
given by Commission to several public and private Bills
(for which see Lords' report.) On his return the SPEAKER
announced the titles of the Acts.
IMPROVEMENT OF THE JURISDICTION OF
EQUITY BILL.
The consideration of the Lords' amendments to the
Bill were then resumed.
Sir W. P. WOOD added to what he had already stated
in reference to the Master of the Rolls, that th© Bill was
prepared by the late Lord Chancellor upon the recom-
mendation of the report of a Committee, and the Master
of the Rolls had nothing to do with the preparation of
its provisions.
Tne SOLICITOR-GENERAL said he was convinced
the House would feel perfectly satisfied with this expla-
nation ; and he was equally convinced with his Noble
Friend in another place that no stigma whatever could
be attached to the untarnished reputation of the Master
of the Rolls in reference to this or any other subject.
It was quite evident that the statement complained of
was made under a misapprehension, which perhaps
was excusable when it was remembered that his
Noble and Learned Friend who made it had
been so much taken up with such extensive and
valuable law reforms as those which had just been
brought about. He would take., the liberty of mention-
ing, in conclusion, that those improvements were only
the precursors of others of a far more important cha-
racter, which would be proposed to future Parliaments.
After a few words from Sir H. WILLOUGHBY,
The Lords' amendment was disagreed to, and a
Committee appointed to hold a conference with the
Lords on the subject.
SUITORS IN CHANCERY RELIEF BILL.
The Lords' amendments to this Bill were considered
and agreed to.

RELIGIOUS PROCESSIONS.
Mr. HENRY BERKELEY wished to ask whether
the Act in force to prevent Roman Catholic processions
cannot restrain processions by clergymen of the Church
of England in imitation of Roman Catholic processions;
and, if it cannot, whether her Majesty's Government
have any intention to frame such an Act as may put a
stop to such practices.
Sir F. KELLY said in answer to the question of his
lion. Friend he had to state, in the first place, that the
Act of Parliament which was now in force had no rela-
tion whatever to religious processions—if such had ever
existed—in which clergymen of the Church of England
performed a part. The Act of Parliament applied entirely
to processions composed of Roman Catholic priests or
Roman Catholic persons.—(Hear, hear.) With regard
to the remaining part of the question, he had only to
state that the Government were not at all aware that the
law had been violated in the manner represented in any
part of the kingdom; and therefore it was scarcely ne-
cessary for him to state that the Government had no
intention whatever of proposing, either in this or any
other Parliament, a Bill of the nature suggested by the
question.—(Hear.)

LEOPOLD DE ROSE. '
Lord DUDLEY STUART would move for a copy of
the depositions taken at Gosport on the case of Leopold
do Rose, who was sentenced to imprisonment, with hard
labour, 00 the 13th day of November, 1851. The Noble
Lord recapitulated the circumstances of the case which
he
had detailed on the previous day. Be added also
that Captain Hamilton, who had given De Rose into
custody, had also insulted him by telling him that,
as a Pole, he belonged to the most rascally
set of scoundrels that ever were let loose on this coun-
try. Toe Noble Lord then proceeded to point out the
injustice
of the case, remarking that even if the
alms
poor POl, had solicited
it would have
been harsh treatment to
It was i give him into custody.
only a few days since an Austrian officer, who had
been engaged in the war against Hungary, applied to him
for relief, and although he
had been opposed
to the prin-
ciples of that affair, ho should have disgraced himself had
he given that man into custody.—(Hear, hear.) And
yet Captain Hamilton had thought it not unbecoming in
a British
a Ache Pole
to be instrumental in imprisoning
of
for fourteen days. The conduct
magistrate was, however, equally repre-
fhoernysi;hilngei'for there could have been no necessity
so sliht an offence with such great severity.
A case of this sort was a disgrace to a country which
boasted of affording protection to fore_igandersr.eat
Mr. H. BERKELEY said that h h pleasure
blee Friengd. He, from
in seconding the motion of his
i personal acquaintance, Itaete that Captain De
greatest delicacy. He
Rose was a gentleman could state
herd there would be no of
t opposition to the motion.
Sir W. JOLLIFFE tted that the subject had
regretted
of the session. Time
been brought on at thirse
ought to have been affordedtPfOr procuring information on
unusual in such a state of
the subject. It was
things that no repTheessentation had been mado to
could promise was that he
the Home-office. All
etter.
would inquire into the
Mr. ANSTEY did ninotathipk, that application to the
Home-office was a very satisfactory remedy in similar
it been made to the Home-office,
cases application had had
and without the least success.oNsaid this was a case descry-
Lord PALMERST
accurate investgation, and he hoped
deserv-
ing ft minute and
the Government would tam, care that such aninvestiga-
tion was had. Tho Noble Lord who had introduced
this subject was entitled to the thenks of the country for
having done so, since it would convince the world that
even the wrongs of a poor foreigner could not be over-
looked by Parliament.—(Hear, hear.)
After a few words from Lord DUDLEY STUART,
the motion was withdrawn.
MOSQUITO TERRITORIES.
Sir DE L NCY EVANS wished to ask, on behalf of
British subjects having trading establishments in the
Mosquito territory, whether the policy of the British
Government regarding that territory, and the support
hitherto given to the Chief or so-called King of Mos-
quito, is intended to be changed, and, if so, in what
respeote?