The Sun.
London, England, 1852-03-03 00:00:00

LLOYD'S SHIPPING-(THIS DAY.)

LuNDoN, MARCH 3.—W Ind at noon N., fresh breeze,
and fi w. ath. r.
QUEENSTOWN, ARCH I.—Wind N.W —Arid. Coro-
mandel, Callao; PrzspEct, ditto; Cooks, Laguna for
Altone.
FALMOUTH, MARCH 2.—Wind W.N.W.—Arrd. Mar-
curiosis, Monte Video. Off pore, Abel Gower, Callao
ft.r Aberdeen; Mary, Calcutta; Clotilde, Haysnnah.
FOIITHADIPTON, MARCH 2.—Wind S.E.—Sid. Thames
ste.tiner, Weil Indies.
COWES, MARCH 2. Wind N.E.—Sld. Fairlie, Hobart
Town.
BRISTOL, MARCH 2.—Wind N.W.—Arrd. Queen of
the Ocean, New York; Isabella Smart, St. Andrew's,
New Brunswick; Falcon, ditto.
NEW PORT.—Sid. Kitty, Bermuda.
CLYDE.—Sid. Gondola, Trinidad; Mountaineer, Ha-
Viennah.
RAMSGATE, MARCH 2,—Wind N.N.W.—Arrd. Maria,
London for Jamaica, very leaky, and part of crew re-
fusing to work.
PORTSMOUTH, MARCH 2.—Wind W.N.W. to N N.E.
Essex, Madras and Calcutta.
SCILLY, MARCH I.—Wind W.N.W.—Arrd. Costello,
New Orleans, very leaky; crew sick.
DEAL, MARCH 2.—Wind N.W.; Noon, N.N.E.;
N.E., fine—Arrd. Woodbridge, Singapore. Arrd. from
the River and s/d. Madagascar, Calcutta; Ellen, Sierra
Leone; Eliza Sharp, St. Kitts. Sld. Strive, Porto Rico;
Black Nymph, ditto.
LIVERPOOL, MARCH 2.—Wind E.N.E.—Arrd. Awe'
rica, New York; Cousbrook, Corisco; Barkhill, Pa-
raiba, std. Jan. 20, and left no English vessels there;
Falcon, New Orleans; Atala, ditto; Jane Glassen, ditto;
Saxon, ditto; Clara tiymes, ditto; Courier, ditto; Wil-
liam Hi7clacock, Apalachicola; Anne, Charleston; Al-
made, ditto; A. ClaGeseborough, Baltimore and St.
Thomas's. Off port, Asi..3, Mobile; City of Manche"
steamer, Philadelphia; George Glin, William Parker.
Asmante steamer, Cannata, Hebe, and William Perie.
Sld Emerald steamer, Africa; William Fisher, Valpa-
raiso; Denison, Antigua; Everton, Jamaica; Wexford,
Boston.

MARKET ISE WS.-( THIS DAY-)

CORN EXCHAN GE-WEDNESDA

Tue arrivals or English Wheat since Monday,we ha "aati
wipe and by laud carriage, having been limited,
a very small show of sampl, s nere to-day; nevertheless
the ri,maild for all descriptions, as the attendance of
buyers was on the decrease, ruled inactive, at prices
barely equal to those obtained last week. For forward
delively eery tew transactions were reported. The fill'
ports of foreign Wheat have been confined to 1,440
quarters. Selected qualities were scarce, and quite as
dear. In of ler kinds very little business was transacted.
We haer a steady, though not a brisk,inquiry for malting
B siley, whilst grinding and distilling sorts were quite as
dear. The Malt trade was dull, but no decline took pleca,
in prices. The
transactions
in Oats were liberal, at full
currencies. The stocks held by cb,alers are considered
small. Beans, Peas, and Indian Girt, were held st late
rates. Fine Flour was steady, but low country woks

avert) rather httheult 01
kti

t dispobul.
VALm THIS WEER

Wheat. Barley.-------------571-;t—U I Malt . Oats.
Qrs. -- —— ack' •
Qrs. Qrs. wrs• s
920
Znglish ...... ' 1,230 1,560 1,4t0 2,430
Irish .. —— 400 , 1,470 30so
Foreign ...... 1,440 630 I 2,610 1, 2,4970 bls

BOROUGH HOP railaiLX.ET.
For most kinds of Hops we have only a moderate
inquiry, yet last week's prices are steadily supported.
VITHITECELAPEL.
Prime Beef and Mutton were to fair request, at full
quotations. Otherwise, the demand ruled neavy. Beef,'
tram 2s 2d to 35 2d; Mutton, 23 6d ,0 3s 8d; Vea'
3s 2d to 4s; Pork, 2s 4d to 3s 8d per 81bs by the carcase.

-------
CHANCERY.—(THIS DA Y.)
The Lord Chancellor and Vicb-ChAnctlior Kindersley
did not sit to-day, in connequence attending the levee.

N
uoionniThoi:euva.e:ewochnieThoeh.as
no
occupied
The
argument ROLLS' COURT.—(THIS DAY.)
the Court fur
neatly five entire days, was resumed this
morning.
The bill was filed by Henry Hoghton, Esq , of 1301,d
Hall, in the county of Lancaster, against his ;tither, S,r
w
Henry Buld Hoghton, of Hoghton Tower, in the same
county (other persons interested being also defendants),
for the purpose of setting aside a deed of settlement
executed by the plaintiff on the 7th July, 1843, about fa
year atter he attained his majority, and which he alleged
he had been induced to execute through the influence'
control, and misrepresentation of his father.
It appeared from the statements of counsel that Pre;
vious to the year 1840 Sir Henry Hoghton, in right n'
his wife, Lady Hoghton, was in receipt of the rental of
~,.
the Bold estate in Lancashire, amounting to about n 6 .•1`
,1
12,000/. ; but upon, the death of Lady Hoghton, in •L'e.
cember of that year, the plaintiff, as her first son, became l ,
entitled as tenant in tail to these estates, he being then :;:..,,e
of the age of 19 years. Within a few days after bee e
,_
death the plaintiff executed a deed, appointing his father e 4
his guardian during his minolity. At this time the .
plaintiff was also entitled as tenant in tail, expectant on
,i
the decease of his father, to the Hoghton estates' of the ,
value of about 8,0001. a year, subject to the life interest a -
of his father. The Bold estate was altogether unelietn;
bared, but the Hoghton estate was subject to mortgafeee
to the Bank of England, Sir R. Peel, and otbers, to
n.e_ii
amount of 81,4001., the annual interest of which annieou
13%1
to nearly 3,500/., and was payable out of that
i duce of et et
these estates, thus reducing the net 111311Utla pro .
Th *
0/ e f
them receivable by Sir henry about 4,50 • Lady
y to.l, e -
by
result of this state of circumstances, produced
- a
Hoghton'e death in 11140, was that the plaintiff became
_ f
eautled in possession to estates worth 12,0001. $ y.. 019, t,‘,....,,:ii
while._ by the same event the income of Sir ilednll2viwown , i
recuced to 4500/. a year. The plaiuttif attain
deed ~.
~,, .at
2,5 August, 1842, and on the 3d he executed a
hisuiln'.. , , :i
eeteilieg tile Bold estates, and thereby enlargiog
the '-';;
teresi. iii them to au absolute estate in flee, and on, _ -,'.0
4th he .xecuted to his father, Sir Henry, a grant t
o ,0".. ij, i
annuity of 2,500/. a year, which, however, was to
own
~.et.3l
tereaine on the plaintiff's discharging out of his _ 0,. :: fet
moneys the mortgages then affecting the lioghte'L.,
,lii J.!
rates. Previously to his son attaining 21, bir Henry .-re !.1--
'shriek,
mad entered into a negotiation with Charles Scan ,
, tes to
E.q. fur Salo to him uf a portion of the Bold ea,"ll,h of
~, -
which the plaintiff had become entitled by the kueadal,o '‘'''-g"
his mother, called the North Meals estate, and "a e. ti T
instructed his solicitor, Mr. Walker, to make arrsontfeg
wants for paying off the mortgages title to
the Hoghton estates out of the nwrinreolo rty•
be produced by the sale of this r- -•eixact
Ultimately, in the month of October, 1842, a conaris..
for the sale of the North Meets estate to Mr.
plain..Se
bricb, at the sum of 132,0001., was signed by eoFe-
and carried into effect ; and in the root" „, eve
bruary, 1843, a conveyance of tho propertY `ran of
cuted ; and part of the purchase Lac'
to iut of
132,0001., was applied in discharge of that
es stesu-1 Re"
mei tgago debt then affecting the Hoghton - iii xecoted,
conveyances of those mortgages were then e , e
ir Pite'Y'
which had been erepared by the solicitor of S ,
_,,,0
the effect of which were to LW rge the whole cuortgru
debt so as to exonerate the Hoghton estate entirely
l
therefrom, instead of keeping it on foot for the
benefit
een
of the plaintiff, which he alleged oughtto havoc) tithe
done; and, accordingly, one of the objects f
' trum the court, that
suit is to procure a deciarationcLa.,
gcs for the benefit
these mortgages are eubeisting
immedi'ate object is to
of the plaintiff. But the meorte
Jen,.
n,
of the Hoghton
set aside the deed of rfeB-453,
which it was stated was
estates, dated 7th Jut!
yu,nder the tollowingcircumstances.
prepared and execputeeere
1842', the arrangements for
ber,
In the month (Ade et
on
the Hof,hton estates out of the
discharging the b
proceeds of part
of the plaintiff's property having been
completed, the defendant, Sir Henry, determined that the
platenil shout
e
d re-settl e these states, and instructed his,
•
solicitor, Mr. a
ev lker. to prepare a settlement accordingly.
On the 7to of July, 1843, the settlement in question was
executed by the plaintiff in the presence of Mr. Walker
and a me, pilkington, in the bed-room of Sir Henry, who
at that time was suffering from severe indisposition,
having a few days previously broken a blood-vessel.
Mr. Walker deposed that, although he never saw the
plaintiff, or received any letter, or other written coma'
umation from him withthe draft
reference to it, vet that
of the settlement was sent to Sir Henr; in London' wits
whom the plaintiff wag then living, fur several months
previously to its executioa, and that there was oot)liDg.
.to prevent the plaintiff fromhaving seen it and perused
it, and consulted his father with reference to'
It The purport of this deed cf re-settlement Wee
stated to be to cut down the plaintiff's
interest in these large estates from en estate tail to an
estate for life, ana that by it large benefits were secured
to the defendant, Sir Henry Hogbton, and his second
Wife, the present Lady Hoghton, without the least
beat fit or advantage to the plaintiff; and powers were
reserved to him which would enable him to dispose of
the estates in fee in the event of his surviving the plain-
tiff, and the plaintiff dying without issue male, and it
was therefore contended that this settlement was void,
and the plaintiff ought -to be put in the same position
with reference to the Hogh ton estates as he was in before
he executed ie. On the part of the defendant, Sir Henry,
it was contended that there had been no misrepresenta-
tion or concealment, that it had long been the intention
of the plaintiff to execute such a settlement, that it was
f
reethleg but what, from the altered circumstances o
the defendant, occa.ioned by the death of his wife, 1s
woes of duty to his father and his younger brothers and_
sisters weuld dictate, and such as was constantly made
in lanaffiee of distinction upon the oldest son coining
of age. oared
Mr. Bethel!, Mr. Follett, and Mr. Bazelgette, app
for the phtintiff; Mr. Roussel!, Mr. Rolf', and Mr. Tor-
lien° for the defendant; Sir Henry Bold Hoghton, and
for the
,Air, R etied, 11 Palmer, and Mr. Charles
be Hall,
wight e, cii kieghton, who claims to interested ail
tirat tenetet in tail under the deed of settlement sought to
be impeached.
; e it
commenced his reply,
Mr BLTHE,I.I. th.s tri, rn
"rt it not the
which is ‘xpected to occupy the greater pe ,
y
weep., of the da

MIDDLESEX SESSIONS.
(Tills DAY.)
James Skinner, Eiu omnibus conductor, nged 24, of
respectable appearance, was found guilty of embezzling
v3rions sums of money, the property of his master and
ernplo)er, Mr. John Wilson, of Holloway.
Another conductor way convicted of e. similar charge,
and the Judge, after a severe uddruss, seater ced them
to twelve months imprisonment with hard labtur.

Ic was gt,nerally rumoured yesterday at the clubs,us-
that Mr. Villiers, at the personal request of Lord John
sell, had consented to withdrew the ill-advised motion of
which, when iiinarting under the effects of Lord Derby s
statement, he had, iu a hasty monaents,given