The Sun.
London, England, 1852-02-28 00:00:00

alear, hear.) He certainly did not expect to receive
any opposition from the Government, because he recol-
lectedthe language used last session oa the subject by
the Earl of Derby, then Lord Stanley.
Mr. HUME—He was not in office then.—(Laughter.)
Mr. SPOONER—Lord Stanley said that " he did not
hesitate to say that they ought now to consider fully,
deliberately, dispassionately, and temperately, but at the
same time firmly, the whole of the difficult question of
the relations in which the Roman Catholic subjects of
this country stood to the Crown." Now he (Mr.
Spooner) meant to ask only for inquiry, grounded upon
the faCt that the relations of Roman Catholics in this
country to the Crown stood in a different position 110 W
from what they did a short time ago. Though gene-
rally he had been a supporter of the policy of the late
Sir Robert Peel, he had nevertheless opposed his pro-
posal for endowing Maynooth. 119 had, therefore, no-
thing to retract in asking that that erviowinent should
cease. Even those who had voted the other way could
have no difficulty now with respect to the question, for
the aggression of last year must have convinced them
that the conduct of the Roman Catholic priesthood had
became completely changed.—(Hear, hear.) If, then.-
fore, any understanding or agreement existed—which
he denied—that the grant should continue, it could only
have been on the principle that it was to be received as
II mark of kindness towards the Roman Catholics, for
which in return they were to expect that the objects for
which Maynooth was founded would he carried out.
Whitt were the original grounds for which Maynooth
was founded?
Mr. ANSTEY rose to order. He thought the lion.
Member was out of order in incidentally discussing the
grant to Maynooth on the motion that the House do ad-
journ.
The SPEAKER said he had not understood that the
Hon. Member was about to make any motion on the
subject. Any Member had a right to address the House
on the question of adjournment.
Mr. SPOONER remarked that the adjournment was
often moved by Hon. Members for the sake of address-
ing the House, and by no one had such a motion been
oftener made than by the Hon. Member for Youghal.
The original object for endowing Maynooth was stated
to be with the view of providing ministers of religion
better instructed and with more kindly feelings towards
the State. He wished to know if that object had been
carried out? Had they any reason for believing that
Maynooth had provided a more national priesthood, or
one with views less hostile to the Established Church.
Whatever understanding, therefore, had been
come to on such grounds was completely an-
nulled by the subsequent conduct of the Ro-
man Catholics. He might refer to the opinion of the
late Sir R. Peel in favour of inquiry. On the 23d June,
1840, Sir R. Peel said that " he could not agree that
the system of education pursued at Maynooth was a
Matter of indifferenee to the Legislature—that it was a
legitimate subject of consideration for Parliament—and
that it would be an abandonment of duty were the House
of Commons to say to the Roman Catholics, Here is
the money—do with it what you please—inculcate doc-
trines subversive of order and injurious to morality—we
shan't interfere.' "—(Hear, hear.) Now he was prepared
to maintain that the system of education at Maynooth
was contrary to order, and at the same time injurious to
morality.—(oh, oh.) Ho should not now discuss that
art, as a better opportunity would occur.—(Hear.) As
he had stated he did not expect the Government to op-
„pose the motion when brought forward. Still less did he
expect it would meet with opposition from the Roman
Catholic gentry themselves. Knowing the high character
of many Roman Catholics, and living in intercourse with
many respectable Roman Catholic families in his
own county, he felt certain they were ignorant of the
doctrines contained and of the principles incul-
cated in the books used in the College of May-
nooth.—(Hear, hear.) Since he had given notice of
his intention to bring the subject before the House it had
been his duty—a painful one he confessed—to inquire
into the system of education pursued at Maynooth; and
he had no hesitation in saying that it not only did not
do what Sir Robert Peel said it was intended to do, but
that it was subversive to order and injurious to me-
. rality.—(Hear.) lie went further, and maintained that
• it inculcated doctrines completely antagonistic to the
holy word of God.—(Cries of "0 h," and " Question.")
It placed the Church above—(Question). That was the
question.—(Laughter, and cries of " Adjournment.")
That cry of question he could only attribute to a feeling
that flinched from an assertion that could not be contra-
dicted.—(oh.) lle did assert that the system of educa-
tion at Maynooth did inculcate doctrines completely an-
tagonistic to the holy word of God.—(Cries of " Oh.")
~Re would prove it.—(Laughter, and cries of " No, no.")
It placed the Church above the word of God. It put the
Priest in the place of God.—(011.) It inculcated doc-
trines of a nature so horrible, that the nation which
supported the system under hich they were taught
could not escape being guilty of a national sin, which
Would certainly draw down upon it the Divine dis-
111easure.—(0h, and question.) lie knew he should be
despised' by some, and ridiculed by others, for what he
bid said; but he cared not. Ile was determined not to
flinch, and was prepared to prove every word he had as-
serted. He had no reason to be ashamed of Him who
declared that of all who where so ashamed He should
be ashamed of them. He should bring the whole ques-
tion forward on an early day after Easter. The first
• motion he had given was general. The second was dis-
tinct. Both stood on the paper, but the notice he in-
tended to proceed with was for a Committee to inquire
into the system of education at Maynooth. If the mo-
tion were acceded to he pledged himself to prove that
the assertions he had made were founded on facts.
Mr. ANSTEY said that when the lion. Member com-
menced his long discourse—(A laugh)—he thought that
the Hon. Member was about to oppose the motion for
adjournment, and to move that the House should sit
during the next fortnight, and inquire into the works of
Dens, Delahogee, Liguori, and others, taught at May-
tooth. The Hon. Member had, however, postponed his
motion.
Mr. SPOONER said he had distinctly stated that he
intended to bring it forward after Easter.
Mr. ANSTEY remarked that the Hon. Member bad
not fixed any day. The motion of the Hon. Member
consisted of two parts—one for an inquiry into the
scheme of education, and another for leave to bring in a
Bill to repeal the Maynooth grant.
Mr. SPOONER denied that it was so.
Mr. ANSTEY was under the impression that the
notice of motion was for the repeal of the Maynooth
Endowment Act. If that were so, and if the
Honourable Member brought forward such a mo-
tion, he now gave notice that he would ask leave
to brin in a Bill for the repeal of every Act by which
endowments for religious purposes had been created.
by athe Legislature ant of public resources.—(Hear,
near.) The time, he thought, had arrived for such a
ineasnre. He believed if the lion. Member was not at
resent in office, it was not becratso he had not been of-
Teti office, but because he had refused it.—(Mr. Spooner
shook his head.) It had been decided that the Hon.
r'ifetaber was in order in the remarks he had made, but
still questioned the taste of the Hon. Member in
Snaking them.
• Mr. GRATTAN said a few words deprecatory of
tingingcon-
the discussion, and advised the Hon. Member
for Warwick, if he got into a vessel, not to try and up-
'set _(Laughter.)
• Mr. NEWDEGATE said that his lion. Colleague had
Never been offered office, and the motion of which he had
given notice was his own. Government had nothing to
do with it.
Mr. OSBORNE had that reliance on the consistency
of the Hon. Member for North Warwickshire as to feel
Main that, on whichever side of the House ho might
sit, there would be nothing intolerant which he would
'not advocate. Without adverting to Maynooth, ho
should like to know why the Secretary fur the Treasury
had left the House on Maynooth being mentioned?—
. (Laughter.) That Hon. Gentleman had given notice of
a education
for a modification of the national system of
in Ireland. If he should bring it forward, he
'``."-a`nrrne) should move an amendment to it.
r
• E. B. Rea
discussion rested CUE said the responsibility of the
gave the Hon. withe those who had introduced it. Ho
credit of acting in LiTnalt)er for North Warwickshire the
rtgbtforward way on all subjects.
He understood the
bring the question ofu
Maynooth
was determined to
(Hear, hear, from Mr. Spooner.) before the House.—
made by the Government
If the legal appoint-
mentsthought the lion. Member neeT.ltiiviere looked to, he
Government.—(bear.)
not despair of being
supported in his motion by
Mr. EWART thought the Ffonvn.pißleetee—mot leireaorUght to
ta4reehdnettohe paper.
fix a day, and ballot at once for his
The motion for the adjournment of
House till
Friday, the 12th of March, was then
NOTICES OF MOTION'. '
Mr. G. THOMPSON gave notice for the
18th
March of a motion relating to the supply of coalstothoef
dockyards.
Mr. REYNOLDS gave notice for the same day for an
address to the Crown for compensattoli to the sufferers
from the failure of the Cuffe-etreet Saving B
s ank.
Mr. OSBORNE gave notice with reference to the
-motion of the lion. Member for the Univeratty
.of Dub-
hn for a modification of the national eystern ot educa-
tion, that he should move an amendment that
_ any inter-
, ference by the clergy of the Esteblished Church with
the nationaVsysterie of education in Ireland would he
productive of religious discord, and injurious totho spi-
ritual interests of the people.
Mr. HUME gave notice that on the 12th of March he
should move for an inquiry into the causes of the long-
continued discontent is the lonian Islands.
Mr. HOBHOUSE, on behalf of Mr. Slaney, gave no-
tice for the 18th of March of a motion for leave to bring
to a Bill to legalise industrial partnerships.
FREE TRADE—PROTECTION.
Mr. VILLIERS gave notice that on an early day after
the re-election of Ministerial Members he should sub-
mit a resolution declaratory of the intention of the House,
to maintain the policy of free trade, and to resist any
attempt to re-impose a duty on foreign corn.—(Cheers.)
NAVY ESTIMATES.
• Mr. F. MACKENZIE gave notice, that on Friday,
the 12th of March, the Navy Estimates would be taken
in Committee of Supply.
REFORM.
Mr- HUME gave notice, that on as early a day as he
could do so, he would bring On the same motion for
parliamentary reform which he had introduced last
session.

MINISTERS' MONEY.
_Mr. REYNOLDS gave notice that on the 16th of
!Urch he would move for a Select Committee to inquire
Into the &object of ministers' money in Ireland.
EDUCATION.
Mr. FOX postponed his motion relative to education
until an early day after the adjournment.
The SPEAKER then called on the
on droppedmoti ordere.
Mr. ANSTEY gave notice that, the on for
going into:a Committee of Sup Ply, he would move as an
,nkendment that a Commission be appointed to take evi-
dence with respect to the Government of India by the
ftst India 'Company.
Mr: C. L—WIS said
the greater number of the other

TIIE

S IT. N;__

orders of the day were Bills introduced by the late Go-
vernment, and he would, therefore, postpone them until
the 12th of March, when the Noble Lord the Member
for London would attend in his place in the House
and state the course which he meant to pursue about
them.
(These were the Parliamentary R-presentaticn,
Corrupt Practices a► Elections, Suitors in Chancery
Relief, Passengers' Act Amendment, St. Alban's Dis-
franchisement, General Board of Health, and the Im-
provement of Towns (Ireland) Bills.)
The Committees of Supply and Ways and Means were
also postponed.
Mr, C. LEWIS, moved the secoed reading of the Per-
sonal Estates of Intestates Bill.—Agreed to.
The Commons' Enclosure Bill was read a third time
and passed.

PETITIONS.
Mr. CROWDER presented two petitions from sur-
geons and chemists of Liskeard, in favour of the Phar-
mscoutical Bill now before the House.
Mr. SULLIVAN presented petitions from the county
of Kilkenny, in Ireland, and also the county ,
some in favour of Mr. S. Crawford's Bill, others com-
plaining of the present system of poor-law taxation, and
praying en amended valuation.
Mr. MUNDY presented petitions from Derby, and
other places, against any further grant to Maynooth.
Mr. SCULLY presented petitions from the Thurles
and Borrisokane boards of guardians, praying fur an
inquiry into the system of land taxation; and also some
from other parts of the county of Tipperary, in favour
of Mr. S. Crawford's Bill.
Mr. SADLEIR presented a petition praying the re-
peal of the Ecclesiastical Titles Act.
Mr. HEYWOOD presented petitions from Lanca-
shire in favour of the ocean penny-postage system, on
the subject of education, and the disfranchisement of a
local borough.
Mr. REYNOLDS presented six petitions from Ty-
rone, praying the repeal of the Ecclesiastical Titles
Act.
Mr. O'FLAHERTY presented various petitions from
Galway, in favour of an improved system of valuation
and taxation in Ireland.
Mr. F. MACKENZIE presented a petition from the
Kirk Session of Aberdeen, against 'the abolition of the
university tests in Scotland.,
Mr. SCOBELL presented petitions in favour of the
Pharmaceutical Bill and against the post-horso duty.
Mr. T. M'CULLAGII presented a petition from Mo-
naghan, in favour of the Landlord and Tenant Bill of
Mr. S. Crawford.
Mr. E. B. ROCHE presented petitions from at-
torneys in the county of Cork, praying the repeal of the
tax on their profession; also petitions in favour of Mr.
S. Crawford's Bill, and for the repeal of the Ecelesi.
astical Titles Act.
Mr. COLLINS presented petitions from the West
Riding of Yorkshire in favour of the Pharmaceutical
Bill, and against further grants to Maynooth.
Mr. HUME presented petitions from Montrose
against the post horse duty; from Glasgow distillers
against the Scotch Public-houses Bill; also some in fa-
vour of the ocean penny-post system; and one from
Norwich complaining of gross bribery and corruption
practised at elections, upon the prayer of which he
gave notice of a motion. He also presented a peti-
tion from some thousands of the seamen of the port
of London, complaining of the mode of taking registra-

don tickets.
The O'GORMAN MAHON presented a petition from
the town commissioners of Ennis, complaining of the
danger of life and property incurred by the inhabitants
of that place, in consequence of certain alleged neglect
on the part of the Irish Board of Works with respect to
the River Fergus. Be gave notice of moving for the
printing of the petition.
Mr. ROUNDELL PALMER presented petitions
from Plymouth in favour of the Parmaceutical Bill.
Mr. E WART presented petitions in favour of the re-
peal of the duty on newspapers and advertisements.
The House then, on the motion of Mr. FORBES
MACKENZIE, adjourned at Half-past Eight o'clock
till Friday, the 12th of March.

PARLIAMENTARY DIVISIONS.

---
(From the Votes and Proceedings of the' House of Commons )
FRIDAY, FEB. 27.
LONDON NECROPOLIS AND NATIONAL
MAUSOL ILUM BILL.
Order for Second Reading read; Motion made and Ques-
tion proposed, "That the Bill be now read a second time ;"
Amendment proposed, to leave out the word " now," and
at the end of the Question to add the words " upon thi
's day
six months :"—Question proposed, " That the word now'
stand part of the Question." Debate arising; Motion
made, and Question put, " That the Debate be now ad-
journed." The House divided :--; '
MINORITY—AYES, 92.
Bilaahrlrouiegkt,olnfi.
Anstey, T. C. Grosvenor, Earl Price, Sir Ti
Armstrong, Sir A. Raiford, Sir Henry Pugh. David
Vllis.count Hall, Colonel Reid, General
Baring, Thomas Richards, Richard
Boldero,Berkeley, Admiral Higgins George
George 11. lllilloaapmr(eliii,:ntlgoine.`:T(C:l: SA:_... Russell, F. C. 11.
Sadleir, John
Scott, Francis
Booth, Sir Ti. G. Joilitle, Sir W. A. Scully'. Francis
llramston, T. V. Keating, Robert Smith, John A.
Bridges, Sir B. Sotlieron, T. li. S.
Keogh, William
Buck, Lewis W. Spearman, 11. J.
Ring, P. J.
L Spooner, Ti.
Bunbury, E. Ii
. Langston, J. H.
Buxton, sir E. N. Lemon, Sir C. Stafford, Augustus
Clay, Jones Lewisham, Viscount Stanton, W 11.
Clive, R. 11. Lockhart, A. E. Staunton, Sir G.
Cochrane, A. D: Long, W. Strutt,, E.
Stuart, Lord J.
Cocks, Thomas S. Lopes, Sir Ralph
Stuart, J.
Codrington, Sir W. Mackenzie, W. F.
Currie, 11. Mackinnon,}`. Sullivan Michael
Drummond, Henry Mahon,O'Gorman Talbot, C. It.
Du Pre, C. G. Mangles, Ti. D. Tollemah, John
Ebrington, Lord Matheson, Colonel Townl
Sir ey, R. G.
Egerton, Sir P. Meux, Sir Henry Tyler, G.
Vane, Lord 11.
Fellow es, E. Morgan, 0.
Foley, John 11. Mundy, William Wigrain, Loftus
Freshfleld, J. W. Neck!, John Willoughby, Sir H.
Frewcn, C. 11. Newdegate, C. N. Worcester, Marquis
Fuller, A. E. Newport, Viscount Wynn, 11. W.
Glyn, G. C. Ogle, S. C.
TELLERS.
Goddard, A. L. Fatten, J. W.
Greene, Thomas Plowden, W. IL Grosvenor, Lord R.
Grenfell, C. Pascoe Power, NicholaS Howard, C. W. G.

MAJORITY—NOES, 161.
Aglionby, 11. A. Geach, Charles Peto, SatnF
Anderson, Arthur Gibson, T. M. Ponsonby, CIC. .
Anson, General Gould, Wyndham Prime, Richard
Bailey, Joseph Hall Sir B. Renton, J. C.
Baring, 11. B. Hallowell, E. G. Ricardo, Osman
Bell, Jacob Harrii, Richard Salwey, Colonel
Berkeley, C. L. G. llastie, Alexander Sanders, Ge
Bethell, K. llastie, Archibald Scholetleld, Williamtiremridge,
firenirldge, Richard Ilayter,
ter
W. G. Scobell, Captain
Brocklehurst, John Heard,
J. I. . Seya, H. K.:
Brotherton, Joseph Heywood, James Sidney, Aldermanamin '
Brown, H. lleyworth, Lawrence Smith, J. I3eM
Robert
Brown, W. Hill, Lord M. Stephenson,
, Sir C. Ilindley, C. Strickland; Sir G.
Burrell
Butler, S. P. llobhouse, T. B. Stuart, Lord 1).
Carter, J. B. Hope, Sir J. Thompson, Colonel
Chatterton, Colonel Howard, P. H. Thompson, George
Clifford, 11. M. Hudson, George Thornely, Thomas
Cobden, Richard Hume, J. Townsheibl, Ca ptaln
Collins, Thomas Inglis, Si R. Verney, Sir H.
Copeland, Alderman Knight, F. W. Villiers, Charles
Davies, D. A. Lacy, 11. C. Vivian, J. E.
Dawes, Edward Lushington, C. Vivian, Thomas
Douglas, Sir C. E. Lygon, General Walmsley, Sir J.
Duncan, George, M'Cullagh. W. Wawn, J. T.
T.
Ellice, Edward M'Gregor, John Williams, John
Ellis, John Martin, J. Williams, W.
Evans, Sir De Lacy Masterman,,T. Williamson, Sir IL
Evelyn, William J. 3Wo
lilligan, Robert Wilson, Matthew .
Ewart, William Morris, David o,
James
d, Sir W. P.
Fergus, John Norreys, Sir D. Wood,
Fitzroy, Hon. H. O'Connell, H. J. TELLER%
Fordyce, A. D. O'Connor, Feargus
Forster, Matthew, Osborne, Ralph Duke, Sir J.
Fox, W. J. Puke, C. W. Motvatt, Francis
Gaskell, J. M. Pendarves, Edward
-

WORCESTER AND HEREFORD RAILWAY BILL.
Order for Second Reading read; Motion made, and Ques-
tion proposed, " That the Bill be now read a second time :"
Amendment proposed, to leave out the word " now," and
at the end of the Question to add the words " upon this
stand day
six months,:"— Question put, " That the word '
part of the Question." The House divided
. MAJORITY—AYES, 156.
Adair, R. Shafto Grosvenor, Earl Reid, General
Adderley, C. B. Raiford, Sir 11. Repton, G. W.
Aglionby, H. A. Hall, Sir 13. Reynolds, Jonh
Anderson, Arthur Hall, Colonel Ricardo, Osman
Rice
Anson, General Hamilton, G. A. ,E. R.
Armstrong, Sir A. Harris, Richard Richards. Richard
Bagshaw, John Ileadlam,-,T. E. Roche, E. B.
Baring, Thomas Beard, J. I. Romilly, B.
Bell, Jacob Hervey, Lord A. Russell, F. C.
Birch, Sir T. Heywood, James Sadleir, John
Blewitt, Reginald Iliggins, G. G. , Salwey, Colonel
,
Braniston, T. W. Hill. Lard MarCUS Sanders, George
L'returitig,e, Richard Robliouse, T. B. Selioletleld, William
Broadwood, Henry Hogg, Sir J. W. Scully, Francis
Brocklehurst, John Iloward, C. W. Sc Hier, Ileury Ker
Howard, P. 11. Seymour, LI. D.
Brotherton, J.
Hudson, G. Seymour, Lord
Brown, W.
Buck, L. W. Hume, Joseph Sidney, Alderman
Banbury, E. H. Joluistone, Sir J. Smith, John Abel
Butler, I'. S. Jolliffe, Sir W. G. Smith, John B.
Campbell, W. F. Keating, Robert Spearman, 11. J.
Clitlord, Henry 31. Keogh, William Stafford, AtigustUS
Cobden, Richard Knight, F. W. Stanstield, W. It.
CCOcp:isa'rrird., S.
Alderman
Collins, W. ita s t on,
Joseph J . il. Stephenson, Robert
Strickland, Sir G.
Dawes, Edward Lockhart, A. E. Strutt E.
Douglas,_ Sir C.
Duke Sir Lockhart, W. Stuart, Lord Dudley
Dune' James loveden, Pryse Stuart, Lord James
"' Cie°rUe Mackenzie, W. F. Sullivan, Michael
buncombe,W
Du pre, ~. •E • Mangles, R. D. 'Penitent, Sir J.
Ellice, Edward
Martin, John Thompson, Colonel
Ellis. John arli
, 101
tmoi,o_ortg:sa. scoibl:rwonolotah,;raisrynatteite.G
eweau:lyß,;:uailbniJohnap.geherer thi:.,on y Tl,w7,l;lv_vvh,alaaeeouisginwilmtgo,hpiiscesii,oae. Aldermanjrnydio.:,;isjsi.rr.p7F...
Evans,Foie Jj.° H. Matheson, Sir J. Townley, H. G.
Fergus, John Maule, Pox Verney,wad ding St tort 1 11.
,David
. Milligan,-
Fordyce, A. D.
Forster, M. Morgan, 0 Wakley, T.
Fox, W. J.
W_w_illioOda,t.ns.si,rJohn
Freshfield, J. W.
Frewen, C. 11.
Fuller, A. E.
(leach, Charles
Gibson, T. M.
fatten,
Glyn, G. C.
Iferteilecitdn'eeaFl' r Frederick
rjei drs.eß, IV:Dil;;IT W. . • ' . 'NW:Iv:el:1:i isoiaasum:g.uls.s2. l'obn. wyacc"t, t
~.hg84.711111::
G(doorraalch(eia,tmNoV:ntara
Sir Jam" Perfect, R.
Peto, Samuel M. wow, Sir W. P.
Grattan Henry
Portal, Melville Worcester, Marquis
Greene, Power, Power, Nicholas Txt.l.om,
tireufell, C. P.
Grey, Ralph Wal• 'non. General
--------.

MINORITY—NOES, SG,
Scobell, Captain
Gastell, J. M.
Scrape, Q.P.
Bar
rock E. U.
+ Goddard, A. L.
Smythe, George
Barrington, ViSCOIIII.
Grogan, E. Stanton, IV. 11.
Bellew, It. ),I. E• ci.
Halley., ell. E. Stuart, J.
Bennet. Pp Harding°, C. S.
Talbot, C. B.
Berkeley; Admiral 1 er, W. U. Thompson, George
Berkeley, C. L. G.
Berkeley, Henry F.
1 'l3l
rth, L. Thornely, T.
Tollernache, John
Boldero, H. O.
Booth, Sir B.➢G. Hope, Sirs.. Townshend, Captain
Brown, Humphrey !Awl"' B. Tyler, Sir G.
Chatterton, Colonel Lemon, Sir C. Villiers,Sharles
Clay, James Lewisham, Via.
Rope, e°y Chatlei
Vivian, J. E.
Clive, It. It. Littleton, E. It.
`Whitmore, T.'C.
Cochrane, A. D. Morris, David
Wigram, LoftuS
Codrington, Sir W. Neeld, John
Wynn, 11. W
Davies, D. A. Newdegate, G. N. .. -
Drunalauri,g, Viscount Newport, Viscount
Drummond, Henry Pugh, David
Egerton, Sir P. Benton, John C.
Evelyn, W. J. St. George, Chris.

TFILE Re.
Hope, Ilenry T.
Spooner, Rickard

CONTRACTS FOR HORSES
FOR TIM ROYAL AUTIL:
LERy.—Several officers from Woolwich have been appointed
to proceed to Yorkshire and other counties renowned for the
breed of cavalry horses, to enter into contracts for supplying
her Maje3ty's Royal Horse Artillery with young and strong
horses Auitable for that branch of the service.