The Sun.
London, England, 1852-06-10 00:00:00

IMPJRIAL PARLIAMENT.

• ROUSE OF COMMONS, June 9.
icPtitittnitd from our Afternoon Edition of yesterday.)
SCOPAL AND CAPITULAR REVENUES,
Sec. BILL.
The Maranis of BLANDFORD moved the second
wading of this Bill.
Mr. -WALPOLE considered the state of the session
teould not admit of their going into a discussion upon a
measure of this extensive nature, even if there
was nothing is the provisions calling for Particular ob-
jection. .Since tho Bill had been introduced he had con-
sulted the highest authorities in the Church, as well as
others who took an interest in the subject, and he was
now prepared to say the Government would undertake
the esansideration of the state of the cathedral bodies and
institutions, so as to place them generally on a more
satisfactory footing, and to make them more practically
useful than they were at present in regard to spiritual
instruction and education. Under those circumstances
ho hoped. the Noble Lord would consent to the order for
the sec'ond rending. being now read and discharged.
Tlve Marquis of BLEII4MFORD said he had ex-
peef ed that the Government would have made some de-
cheration with regard to the Bill.
Mr. WALPOLE, did not think the House ought to
epledge the Government to any details,—(llear.)
Mr. SLANEY heard the statement of the e;ccretary
for :the Ileum Department with great satisfaction, and
he trusted the Noble Lord would accept his offer aad
withdraw the Bill.
After a few words from Sir B. BRYDGES,
Mr. WALPOLE pointed cu; the four heads of the
Bill, and said it was the wish of the Government to re-
lieve as much as possible those who held high offices
in the Church from all duties of a worldly and tem-
poral nature.—(Heer, hear.) The spirit in which
the. Government proposed to proceed was to con-
sider whether these groat cathedral establishments
trielit not be more fully restored to the high and holy
egrposes far which they were originally founded and
endpwed, viz., as temples for the daily worship of the
Almighty Being, es seats of learning, as councils to assist
the bishops in several matters relating to their dioceses, and
as connecting links betwe n the higher and lowerorclere of
the clerey, so as to bring the whole body of the Church
in perfect harmony.—(Cile"6.) That being the general
view of the Government,
e thought it would be prema-
ture for the House to prejudge the question by binding
them to any particular details.—(l.lean)
Lord EBRINGTON was glad to hear that the Go-
vernment intended to take the whole subject of the Bill
into their serious consideration.
sic B. H. INGLIS thanked the Secretary for the Home
Department for the general view he had given of the in-
tentions of. the Government, and concurred in the de-
sirableness of not continuing the present discussion now
thae thine was a general opinion in the House that the
DM ought not to be pressed.
Lord B. GROSVENOR also expressed his gratifica-
tion at hearing the declaration of the Right Hon. Gen-
tleman.
Mr. J. WILLIAMS hoped, in any measure which
might be proposed, provision would be made to prevent
any clergyman being appointed to a bishopric in Wales
who was cot acquainted with the Welsh language.
Sir BENJAMIN HALL considered that unless the
management of ecclesiastical property was placed in
a Commission, and the salaries of Bishops and other
functionaries in the Church, the existing abuses
would still be continued. He hoped the Govern-
ment would see there was a disposition and de-
terreenation on the part of the laity to insist not
only on reforms in the manner in which the
ecelesis.stiaal body performed their duties, but that
a full and searching inquiry should be instituted
into the temporalities of the Church, not with the
viow of depriving her real and efficient servants
of good and sufficient incomes, but with the intention of
effecting necessary reforms. If the Government did not
yield to the voice out of doors, and propose a measure
Zvell halculated to remedy abases in the Church, matters
would come to a much more serious pass than was now
contemplated.
Mr. HORSMAN said, though the Noble Lord would
Set judiciously in not pressing the Bill, he thought they
siroajd have an opportunity to discuss the subject, in
order that the Government might know what was the
general opinion of the House. it was impossible to
detley the question, for the ecclesiastical system was ap-
presoaking a crisis, and if the Government shrunk from
the clanger and tried to remedy the abuses the time for re-
form would soon pass away. Public opinion was already
metered and explicit as to the condition of the cathedral
establishments, as to the management of eviscoeal and
capitular estates, and as to the present condition of the
episcopate. A fixed income for bishops was infinitely
preferable to the existing system of payment; and as
the 4ersn had given up her estates in return fur an
entreat vote, end as judges and other public function-
aries were paid by a fixed salary, he saw no reason why
the episcoieal body should object to receive their
incomes, from the Crown or a Royal Commission.
Eeclesiaeeical law was "he exception to the reform which
had taken place in all other branches of the Jaw, and that
bte.seee it had been left in the hands of the Bishops
themselves, who had proved that they were ill adapted
for that duty. The principle of reform of existing
ah'asea meat meet with the general concurrence of the
Rouse, and the abuses existing in the ecclesiastical law
"must be retformed in spite of the dignitaries of the Church.
Mr. OSWALD was of opinion that no reform
real* beneficial to the Church of England
could take place without the concurrence of that
Church itself. By the Constitution of this country, the
Church of England had had a corporate body of its own
members to regulate its own affairs, and it was the duty
of the House to provide far the edcieney of that body,
but, at the same time, no good end would he attained by
Parliamentary Committees attempting to regulate the
atfairs of the Church. I; should be remembered that the
Ohrirch of Euglanci was only a part of the great eengfi-
ceta Church, uud that in all other parts or the world
where that system obtained. representaavo
ugly conitirutiql, existed, and this materially prevented
white in England was frequently called priestcrail. It
was his strong opinion that this Howe had no right to
interfere with the eaternui affairs of the Church of Bug
land.:

Mr. S. 111,313E13,T thought the Noble Lord would do
well to frankly accept the proposal of the Government.
The eenciliatory tone and moderation of vie?, of the
Secretary tor the Home Department convinced him
them was no man in whose hands they might better
trust-this important question for adjudication.—(Hear.)
Due the butlject was obviously beset by very great Cite-
ce.lities, and if the Government attempted to deal with_
it they must exercise very great forbearance.
_T he
questions to be considered were, the extension of the
piscopate* the direinmion in the number of chapters,
the abolition of the office of dean, and likewise the
restitution to the chapters of the especial duties which they
were originally intended to perform. Ha was not one
who thought the proposed increase of the episcopate
was too large, but there was a strong objection in that
Hones to augment the number of Bishops in the House
of Linde, and most of the modes suggested for carrying
out the increase were open to objections. • In regard to
the pesymerat of Bishops, he thought the system, as it
now stood, was most objectionable, for in fact they were
irus?:ely land agents to the Ecclesiastical Commission ever
41-Intestetes, from which they derived no benefit be-
and the fixed income of their sees, and the quantity of
rju'uilat business imposed upon them could have no other
effect thee to isolate them from the other ranks of the
cute d rgY•
to As to the request that no one should be insti-
stood the avir_bie,ned,ce in Wales except he under-
'l,4ll Language, he thought that more
likely to —;"terfete with the vested rights of patrons.
Bat wit 11"ted interests were considered in a too
lawyer-like spirit it would considerably interfere with
etc iestinal reform.
The Marquis of BLANDFORD noticed briefly some
leadnittiotinze
!sreopethaetepdatihnets urged
as
sourse of the discussion, and
to the object and scope of
the 3ill, which he had given
on
a former eccasion, ob-
serving than inf.order to
; maintain the Unity of the
Cenral], lie bad thought it risce.ssary to preserve its epis-
c,opal charaater.
bet hea°49,ded hy intimating that, in
-hence CU %lea conseq e front the Government,
was then read and discharged.
he would withdraw the
The order of the day
TrLAUSES op
MAXAGEIIENO-N EDUCATION,
COMMITTEE
gir R. H. INGLIS tielsed the Secretary of State for
the
Council on Ed whether
posparea to the Cot, Home Depucaactmtiontwas ene mitte
s e of Privy
4441 - relax-
ettion of the management O:auses?
4ue
Mr. WALPOLE said the Committee had prepared a
tabaute, admitting the relaxation of dh e managing
clauses
in one ecepscts which was a very unporteat one., and
Copy of it would be laid on the table as soon as it was
finally settled.
Sir Be H. INGLIS—Then, is it not settled?
Mr. WALPOLE—The wording is not settled.
COUNTY ELECTRONS POLLS BILL..
On the motion ot Lord R. GROSVENOR for going
into Committee on this Bill,
Mr. PA.CtiE moved that the House go into Committee
on this Bill this day six months. Ho denied that the
excuse, that bribery
was practised on the second day of
county elections, was a true one. There were in England
and. Wales 79 Comity electiona end as at a general eke:
then they would all take place
within a few days
of each
ocher the effect of this Bill would be to disfranchise a
g whispered
that nuMber of electors, which it was ispered
that Bill was intended to do by a side-wind. The Noble
Lord had given notice that it was his intention to enlarge
the time from four to six o'clock; but he would ask,
would it not often happen that the poll would bo
taken for a couple of hours in the dark, and he need not
point. out the suites to which this practice would lead.
The, Right Hon. Baronet the Member for Ripon had, on
a fertner occasion, voted against a measure of this sort,
at, indeed had the Hon. Member for th© West Riding
c,f Yorkshire (Hr. Denison),; whose name he was now
liesprised to see at the back of the Bill. He saw, too,
that the name of the lion. Member for Manchester
(Mr. Bright) VI:A at the back of this Bill ; and he, too,
when Aleenizier for Durhain, had spoken against
opeosed - this Bill a former totem,,, If
ib 3 Noble Lard would consent to grin
o °aba g up
ft e neble non-rfisi,:unt voters to vote by proxy,
7ses veoteeT hav© no objeriti to support the Bill. As it
stoe, however, he should' move that the House ao into
Cor smittse on the Bthis day six months.
7.,ar. IL BAILLIE was Proceeding to ii:sy that as the
Cr ualy which he represented (Inverness-shire) was pe-
e -,lirly ciroutbstaticed, he hopes if he made out a case
'see ehould drain the assent of the Noble Lord to exempt
that county from the Bill, when, being informed that the
Bill did not extend to Scotland, he gave way to
Mr. ALCOCIC, who said that eince the increased
Means of locomotion ho thought there would he no diffi-
in counties in one day.
calty whatever in taking the pulls
Mr. WALPOL said he thought this queation most
materially affected the county Members, and it would be
better to leave it to theta, rather than to take it up as
a Government question. He should not, therefore, be disposed to oppose going into Committee, bid here,
must

warn the Noble Lord of the difficulties which he would
have to encounter, in taking care that this Bill would
be in a proper working condition for the next election.
At present the polling places were fixed by statute, and
it was impossible to alter them, except first ba appli-
cation to qaarter-sessions, and thence trom
qu^ •rter-s• sj.en, to the Queen in Council, who could
teen make the alterations prayed. Nosy we were
in the month of June at present, and it was extremely
improbable that there would be any possibility of making
the application to any quarter-sessions before the coming
election; and, therefore, the alterations in the polling-
places which would be necessary if Chia Bill passed into
law could not possibly be made.
Mr. B. DENISON said that he certainly had at one
time expressed an opinion against a measure of this sort,
but experience had taught him that such alterations
might be safely made. He was quite prepared to
go into all the argument against the Bill, but he would
content himself now with stating to the House that he
held in his hand letters from the under-sheriff and from
the clerk of the peace for Yorkshire, stating that there
would not be the slightest difficulty in taking the poll
in one day.—(Hear, hear.)
Mr. HENLEY said he thought the working of this
Bill would depend to a considerale extent on the cir-
cumstences of the different counties. He thought that
there would in many country districts be a great difficulty
in getting caeri3ges for the transport of the electors. Ho
did not see thus there was any machinery provided is
this Bill to bring it properly iota operation before the
next electien, and unless the Noble Lord could explain
how ho meant to make this Bill a practicable one he
should certainly be inclined to oppose proceeding farther
with this Bill. With regard to the question of experse
he did not think it wee' likely there would be so much
saving as would make that argument of any great
weight.
Mr. CARTER supported the Bill.
Mr. FELLOWES thought the Bill went to create a
New Reform Bill, and to deprive electors of the fran-
chise which had been given to them by the Reform Bill.
Mr. DREDES supported the Bill.
Colonel SIBTHORP said he happened to have votes
for seven counties, and even with the assistance of rail-
roads—of which he was not very fond—he could not, if
this Bill passed, exercise his paramount duty in more
than one of these counties at a general election. He
should certainly give his cordial opposition to this Bill.
After a few words from Mr. W. BROWN and Mr.
LCCIKE ii Na, who supported the Bill,
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said the Noble Lord
had not satisfied him that there was any immediate ne-
cessity for this measure at the present moment. He
was not prepared to say that county polls could not be
taken in one day, and if there were time to prepare
proper machinery he should certainly not oppose going
into Committee. He thought, however, that it would
cause great inconvenience to adopt this Bill at the pre-
sent moment, and the better coarse would be to defer
the consideration of it to some time when they could
have fuller information.
Mr. COBDEN had heard the remarks which had
fallen from both sides of the House. He did not think
that much weight could be attached to the argument of
the Honourable and Gallant Member for Lincoln
that, because he could not vote in seven places,
therefore the county polls all over the kingdom ought
to be taken in two counties. Neither was there mach
weight in the argument that there would be great diffi-
culty in bringing up voters to the poll in a scattered popu-
lation, because it was proceeding on the argument that
voters despised the privilege which they possessed, and
were unwilling to take any trouble to exercise it. He
hoped the House would go into Committee on the Bill.
Sir B. BRYDGES opposed the Bill, because he
thought its effect would be to deprive many persons of
the votes for the county which they now possessed.
In his own county there was one town containing a
population of 20,000, every one of whom who happened
to possess a county .vote would have to travel sixteen
miles to give it.
Mr. BOUVERIE thought the objections which had
been urged aaainst the Bill might be got over by allow-
ing it to go into Committee, and then bringing up a
clause to prevent its coming into operation until next
year.

After a few words from Mr. P. MILES and Mr.
OSWALD, who .sappirted the Bill, the House divided,
when there appeared—
For going into Committee
Against it .

... 166
. 82

Majority ••• —B4
The House then went into Committee on the Bill.
On clause 1,
Mr. HENLEY asked when the Noble Lord intended
hat this Bill should come into operation?
Lord R. GROSVENOR said he intended it should
come into operation at once. Ho was sorry that it had
been made a party question, because he had not at all
brought it forward in that light, but merely to remedy
an acknowledged abuse in the present system of
taking county polls. Ho thought he was perfectly jus-
tified in bringing in the present Pill by the scenes
of drunkenness which he had witnessed on the second
day of poll. Ho proposed to extend the time of polling
until six o'clock in the evening from four, and to provide
additional polling booths, so as to give ono booth for
every 300 electors, instead of 450, by which means he
thought ho should be able to get over the objections
which had been raised as to bringing up the electors
in too large numbers to be polled within one day.
He was anxious to pass the Bill now, because several
contested elections were about to take place, where an
unfortunate effervescence and excitement might be ex-
pected, and ho believed if the Bill passed the evil might
be got rid of.
Mr. 2. DENISON supported the clause, the operation
of which he did not believe would deprive any electors
of the right of voting as they now did. Experience
proved that an election for a county was virtually
decided on the first day. In fact. the first
day's elec!ien had never been overturned on
the knowing day except in one instance, and
he asked whether it was judicious to keep the popu-
lation in euspsnse for twenty-four hours, and to increase
the expcnseConly for a small additional number of votes?
The same objections which were urged against the Bill
were made to Ce prOposal for limiting the election for
boroughs from two deys to one, and there was scarcely
any man who would not admit that alteration had been
productive of great benefit.—(Hear.)
Mr. HENLEY thought in the case of a riot voters
mig:et be prevented giving their votes, and if the poll
was confined to one day, they would not have the oppor-
tunity, which they possessed now, of availing them-
selves of the second day, when steps might be taken to
keep the booths free from disturbance.
EX FRA.ORDINARY CONDUCT OF MR. F.
O'CONNOR.
A brief discussion ensued on the clause, but it was
suddenly interrupted by load cries of " Order."
Mr. B. DENISON here rose in en agitated state, and
said he felt compelled to appeal to the chair in conse-
quence of the conduct of an Honourable Member, who
had just struck him a violent blow in the face with his
hand, (11r. O'Connor was sitting next to Mr. P. Deni-
son on the front bench on the Opposition side.) He
would take that opportunity of stating that he
had experienced considerable inconvenience from
the conduct of that Gentleman, and he had
seen other Members experience similar inconvenience.
They had hitherto treated him with the greatest good
will and forbearance, but there was a point beyond which
it would be unworthy of them to
submit to such con-
duct.—(Loud cries of " Hear, hear.") He regretted
beyond aeyihing that he happened to be the unfortunate
person who felt called on to make these observations, but
believed he spoke the sentiments of the House.
Mr. BERNAL, the Chairman, said, what he had
power to do was to report to tho House when sitting the
conduct of any Member. Therefore, if the Comnuttee
wished him to report the conduct of the Honourable
Gentleman who had been referred to it must instruct
him accordingly.
Mr. WALPOLE said, after what took place last night,
be thought the House had reason to expect that the inter-
ruptions which had occurred lately in the House should
not us repeated again. The Hon. Member had acted in a
dierespseul manner, not only to the Hon. Member
(Mr. Denism) but also to the Chairman, and had inter-
rupted the proceedings of the House, and he thought it
right that an apology should be made by him—(Cries
of " Oh " and " No")—then either that an apology
should bo made or that they should instantly re-
port what had taken place, for the purpose of main-
tainiog order.

Sir J. PAKTNGTON said he accidentally observed
the conduct of the Hon. Member, and he had no hesita-
tion in expressing ..it as his opinion, however painful it
might be to do so, that i: wee indispensably necessary,
not only for the dignity of their proceedings, but really
for the conduct of public business, that this matter ought
not to be allowed to rest. Therefore he hoped the House
would have no hesitation in complying with the proposal
of his Right Hon. Friend that they should suspend the
proceedings of the Committee in order to report to the
highest authority in the House the occurrence which
tm.teddjiaetsetltaken place.—([Tear.) He would move that the
Chairman report progress and ask leave to sit again.
The motion was put and c.,rried, and the Speaker im-
insttueHt
take notice instructed
epeared in his place.
Mr. BERNAL, addressing the Speaker, said—l am
report that the conduct of an Hon. Member
in the
should been such that it is necessary the House
Captain
almost breathless
prrizof it through you.
oy here rushed up to the table in an
that the
same
zionstate, and said he had also to report
galleries; hit hi— : Member had just now, in one of the
a most outrageous manner, and put
g.attitude. He told him that if he
he would knock him down.
eyes spoke to Eau':
A:ipirepploaved that the Hon. Member be
Mr. WALPOL
Mr. J. BELL observed tilril
forthwith called to
his place.
au
annat it was of no use demand-
ing an apology from
, ag from a misfortune. It
• Gentleman who, he was
perfectly satisfied, was auffeti
two medical geetlemen.—(.. 0,,
0.
„under the care of
would be fetich better to Place
him
The ATTORNEY-GENERuaLb,a and a laugh.)
last si d he witnessed the
cfooldwucerit the
in
night,c.
and
from
what
ails own actions.—
sine that he 73 3 sufficiently master': ita:g
,to the conclu-
been
committed een
as he had ever
(Hear ) ale of the grossest bulk,
witnessed had•
Member for whom they all on
highest respect, and it behoved
of putting an end
jsiioned the
to interfere fir the purpose House
to such
conduct —(Elear.) If any thought he was
noto
agent, the event of last night must have convinced
a, free
them of the contrary; and ho certainly Should
consent to his being required to attend in his place not
the consequeaco of which all were aware e—
yesterday he instantly'
convinced .he was capable of understanding wking
gentlemanly and forbearing conduct in the Rouse v7aaat.
for when he was called upon
apologised to the House. It would not be consistent
with the dignity of the House to allow him to retire With-
out adopting measures to suppress a repetition of such
proceedings, and to enable the business of the Zama to
he proceeded with in a proper manner.

Mr. T. DUNCOMBE considered he was partly re-
sponsible for the attack on the Hon. Member. The Hon.
Member for Nottingham was sitting next to him (Mr.
Duneombe), and filter talking a great deal of nonsense,
that Hon. Member gave him a very serious blow on the
side, aed he told him if he did not behave better he would
get into a very serious serape, and in all probability be
shut no, on which he laughed, and immediately turned
round to the Hon. Member for the West Riding, and
struck him in the face. It was really a very difficult
problem to solve whether, after the warning given to
hip, he could be considered a free agent. He should
say he was not.
Mr. HILDYARD concurred in thinking that it would
be a perfect farce to ask the Hon. Member for an apo-
logy, when perhaps before he left his seat he would
renew his outraees. He suggested ho should be com-
mitted for contempt.
The SPEAKER said it was perfectly competent for
the House to deal with the Hon. Member as it pleased,
and if the House thought the act was of such magnitude
as to admit of no apology, it could, without ordering him
to appear in his place, direct that he be committed into
the custody of the Sergeant-at-Arms.
Mr. ANSTEY suggested that • the best way was to
disqualify him as a Member of the House.
Mr. AGLIONBY thought tho Iron. Member was
suffering from an aberration of intellect, and was not
answerable for his conduct. He was a subject more fit
to be placed metier the care of medical men than in the
custody of the Sergeant-at-Arms.
Admiral DUNDAS was clearly of opinion that ho
knew enough to be answerable for what he was doing.
After some further discussion,
Mr. WALPOLE moved that the Hon. Member for
Nottingham be' cornruited into the custody of the Scr-
geant-at-Arras for disorderly conduct,. and contempt of
the House.
This motion was then put and carried without the
slightest dissent, the original motion being withdrawn.
Directions were then given to the Sergeant-at-Arms
to take the Hon. Member into custody.
(During tho discussion Mr. F. O'Connor got off his
seat end walked across the floor once or twice, and also
left the House and returned to his seat, but when he saw
the probable nature of the motion that would be passed
ho slunk away, and we believe was arrested in West-
minster Hall.)
The House then resumed, and clause 1 was agreed to.
On clause 2,
Mr. P. MILES moved the insertion of words to fix
the time for the Bill coming into operation on the Ist
January, 1853.
Lord R. GROSVENOR opposed the amendment, and
the Committee divided, when the numbers vvere—
For the amendment ... ... 91
Against ... ' ... ... ... 134
Majority ... ... ...-43
The amendment was consequently lost.
Clause 2 was agreed to.
Lord R. GROSVENOR then brought up a clause to
enable the high sheriff to make such provision in the
polling bootbs that not more Shah 300 electors shall poll
at the same compartment instead of 450, as is the rule at
present.

Mr. B. DENISON opposed the clause as: being en•
tirely unnecessary, and tending to increase the expense of
county elections.

Mr. HENLEY also opposed the clause.
Colonel SIBTHORP said he supported the clause
simply for the reason that it did cause additional ex-
pense, and he would be very glad to saddle the candi-
dates with any expense he could.
After a short discussion the clause was withdrawn.

Mr. ELLIOT gave notice that, on the third reading,
he should move that Scotland he included in the Bill.
Mr. BAILLIE said that, under those circumstances,
he should move to except Inverness.
Mr. MONSELL also gave notice that he should move
to Mclade Ireland in the Bill.

The House resumed, and the Chairman reported pro-
gress.
COUNTY COURT FURTHER EXTENSION BILL.
The House then wont into Committee on this Bill,
commencing with the 25th clause, which empowers the
Lord Chancellor to give retiring pensions to County
Court Judges.
Mr. STANFORD moved, as an amendment, the fol-
lowing words:—" Provided that such judge, at the time
of such resignation, shall have served the office of judge
for a period not less than 15 years." The clause, as it
now stood, was contrary to all precedent, no pensions
being given to any of the judges unless they had been in
office 15 years, or were afflicted with some permanent
infirmity.
Mr. FITZROY opposed the amendment, which would
limit the pension to 15 years' service without reference
to cases of permanent infirmity.
Mr. WALPOLE acid, the effect of the amendment
:vould be, that no person, whatever might be his in-
firmity, would obtain a pension unless previously to that
infirmity he had been 15 years in office.
After some conversation, the amendment was with-
drawn, and the clause was agreed to with an alteration,
providing for a reference in cases of pensions to the
Commissioners of the Treasury.
Clause 26 (the last in the Bill) *as also a,greed to.
Mr. HEADLAM moved a clause regulating the man-
ner in which warrants of execution against goods and
chattels out of the jurisdiction of a court should be put
in force.
The clause was added to the Bill.

On the motion of Mr. MULLINGS, the following
clause was added to the Bill:—" That after the passing
of this Act no judge of the said County Courts shall
practise at the bar, or as a special pleader, or equity
draughtsman, or be directly or indirectly concerned as
a con viancor, notary-public, solicitor, attorney, or
proctor."
The House resumed.
The Friendly Societies Bill passed through Committee
pro forma, on the motion of Mr. SOTITERON.
On the motion of Mr. R. PALMER the Disabilities
Repeal Bill was read a second time.
.MAYNOUTH CO LLEGE—(ADJOURNED
DEL'ATE).
The resumption of the debate was fixed for Monday.
Lir. ANSTEY inquired if there was any chance of it
corning on?
Mr. SPOONER said it depended on the gnu. Mem.
br as much as anybody else.
Mr. ANSTEY—That could not be the case, as he had
already spoken on the question, and would have nothing
more to do with the debate.

It being now Six o'clock, the House adjourned until
Twelve to-morrow.

MR. F. O'CONNOR.
On the motion being put from the Chair that the Hon.
Member for Nottingham be committed to the custody of
the Sergeant•at-Arms, Mr. Feargns O'Connor im-
mediately left the House with great precipitation,
no doubt with the intention of making his escape
before the question could be carried. He was,
however, closely followed by the Sergeant•at-Arms
and the officers of the House, and despite the small start
he had gained, he was arrested before he got out of
Westmiuster Hall. The Hon. Gentleman was imme-
diately committed to durance vile, where he now remains
in charge of one of the messengers of the House.

THE LONDON GAZETTE, June 8.
DIVIDENDS.
At the Court, Basinghall-street.
T. Roberts, Watling-street, stationer, June 25, at
half-past one--R. H. Cuming, Lamb's Conduit-street,
bookseller, June 25, at one—T. Hatfield and R. Hatfield,
Clapham, plumbers and glaziers, Juno 29, at
one—T. Hatfield, Clapham, Surrey, plumber, Jane 29,
at one—C. Pasheller and J. Pasheller, Huntingdon.
bankers, June 29, at two--J. Rucks, Mill-pond-bridge,
Rotherhithe, cooper, July 1, at twelve—M. T. S. WeLb,
Romford, Essex, linendraper, July 1, at eleven.
In the Country.
G. Mathies, Glastonbury, Somersetshire, scrivener,
July'2, at eleven, at the Court, Bristol—R. W. Johnson,
Gloucester, wino and spirit merchant, July 1, at eleven,
at the Court, Bristol—J. Purniss, Digley-bridge, York-
shire, woollen cloth manufacturer, June 28, at half-past
twelve, at the Court, Leeds—J. Whitwham, jun., Golear,
Yorkshire, woollen cloth manufacturer, June 28, at one,
at the Court, Leeds—J. Mears, Leeds, Yorkshire,
grocer, June 29 at half-past eleven, at the Court, Leeds
—T. C. Willard and G. H. Homan, Manchester, mer-
chants, July 1, at twelve, at the Court, Manchester—
G. Warhurst, Leigh, Lancashire, ironmonger, July 1,
at eleven, at the Court, Manchester.
PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS.

R. Stephenson„Lorabard-street, City, banker,
on Thursday, Joule 10, and the three following Thurs-
days, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Stans-
fold, Basinghall-street.
J. Robinson, Henley, Yorkshire, dyer, 3d., on new
proofs, and final 2J., on any Monday or Tuesday, be-
tween eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Hope, Leeds.
NOTICES OF CERTIFICATES.
At the Court, Basinghall-street.
T. Pearson, Cold Harbour-road, Brixton, builder,
Juco 30, at twelve—T. H. Fiske, Portsmouth, iron-
monger, June 30, at twelve--W. Roberts, Warren-
street, Camden Town, builder, June 29, at half-past
twelve—S. L. Coleman, Norwich, draper, July 1, at
eleven.

In the Country.
H. Davies, Liverpool, leather seller,•July 1, at eleven,
at the Court, Livorpool--G. Sherlock and B. Sutterby,
Hulme, Lancashire, joiners and builders, July 1, at
eleven, at the Court, Manchester—W. Frost, Maccles-
field, Chouiiire, silk throwster, July 1, at twelve, at the
Court, Meinchester—T. Dyson, Bradford, Yorkshire,
linendraper, July 1, at eleven, at the Court, Manchester
—T. Lawson, Bury, Lancashire, draper, Juno 29, at
twelve, at the Court, Manchester.
CERTIFICATES GRANTED.

J. Millard, wading, Berkshire, coppersmith, certifi-
cate of the first class—W. Robinson, Trinity-square,
Tower-hill, corn-factor,, certificate of the third class—E.
Wolsey, Wareham, Norfolk, corn merchant, certificate
of the third class—J. Branch, High-street, Camberwell,
corn dealor, certificate of the third class—R. Wells,
Brig* Linoolnshire, certificate of the third class after one
month.

:PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED.
C. F. Griffin and G. F. Griffin, Beal's-wharf, South-
wark—J. Smith, W. Leggett, and W. Smith (so far as
ragftrds J. Smith), Albion-Wane, King's-cross, furniture
defilers—W. Woodson and G. Surctmerson, Leeds, fancy
shay wl manufacturers—J. G. Atkinson and G. A. Smith,
Pet erborough, attorneys—l. Atkinson and T. Haworth,
But y, Lancashire. power-loom manufacturers—R. Car-
lisle, J. Car Elk., T. Carlisle, J. W. Smith, and J. Ather-
ton (so far as regards J. Atherton), Liverpool, general
rnerc.hants—G. Fraekelton and E. T. Jury, Newgate-
tnarkett, City, carcass butohers—T. Horne, N. Horne,
saturdoe?:Biliaocrianrlasros, Hl;facroaalsmreergeahradnsts
—G.
J.
sor.ace?iffliaonldlanwd:
Buckroyd. Leeds, grocers—J. Hoyle and W. Salisbury,
Burnley. Lancashire, sizu.s—J. W. Ellis and G. Martin,
Leeds I, cloth merchants—W. T. Warne and J. Caries,
Scram I, ha and cap manufacturers—J. Morris and S.
Whielt iou, Eudora, titaffordahire, road oontractora--0.