The Sun.
London, England, 1852-11-03 00:00:00

ELEGANT AND USEFUL.

V. MOSES and SON frequently employ three
•4• words to designate two classes of Goods, one the Depart,
ment of Luxury and Taste, as that of elegant VESTS and
TROWSERS, is ten thousand novel FASHIONS, STYLES, and
SHAPES, for which their Establishments are universally celebrated ;
ELEGANCENvoarth
the other for those STYLISH inventions in COATS and OVER-
COATS, for which they have gained a world-wide fame, yet never
were three so practicably used as at the present season.
numerous for &c.,
fancy
VESTS nd USEFULNESS is displayed in such an array of
and TROWSERS as have not been presented on any
Previous SEASON. B
proof of E. MOSES ande
of wEATTERs,
CAPES, E. MOSES and SON'S innumerable styles
House—a distinction they &c., the names of which are too
can describe, Will,wrecapitulation, and the pecularities of which no words
never loose. Ravin purchased and worn, be an incontestable
SON'S entire precedence over every other
advance
Haring purchased
have long enjoyed, and which they will
rhased to their usual magnificent amount
and be FAR BETTER inaQUAILeIITy'
for this season will be en
previous to any
nrgtehde price of MATERIALS, their DRESS
considerably LOWER PRICES,
E. MOSES and SON'S OUTFITS a
EMIGRANTS PROVIDE FOR
than any offered elsewhere.
OR LAND.
SEA
seafion ; they are prepared for any rut suitable for any passage at any
been procured by thousands of Emigrants,
or occupation ; they have
prices, and of the same matchless quality, and at the same low
thousands more. Having many years attetyd they can be secured by
BUSINESS on the largest scale, E. mu to the OUTFITTING
highest credentials of merit, having larger anSd and
SON have the
transactions than trey other house, they
can
furnishmore trail have
com-
plete and the best OUTFITS for the least men the most
accommodation may be furnished to Emigrants money,
theirar that every
ment, they keep a separate department entirely for Establish-
ment, Outfits. All
necessary information relative to sailing of vessels, cost of •
be had on application, or Post ;free to any
&c., maypart 1 aor the
Kingdom.
CAUTION.—E. MOSES and SON regret having to guard the
public against imposition, leaving learned that the untradesmanlike
falsehood of " Being connezted with their Establishment," or " It's
the same concern," has been resorted to in many instances, and for
Obvious reasons, they beg to state that they have

No CONNEXION WITS ANY OTHER HOCH IN OR OUT OF LONDON,
except their own Establishments, as follows :
London C 8
6, 154, 155, 156, and 157, Maori's, 83.
84, 85, and 86, Aldgate, opposite the Church, an communicating.
London West-end Branch, 506, 507, 508, New Oxford-street, 1,2,
and 3, Hart-street, all communicating.
Bradford (Yorkshire) Branch, 19, Bridge-Stool.

Sheffield Ifranch, 36, Fargato.
Merchant Tailors, Clothiers, Batters, Hosiers Farriers, Boot
and Shoe Makers, and General Outfitters for Ladies and Gentlemen.
IMPORTANT.—ShouId any article not give satisfaction it will be
exchanged if desired, or, if preferred, the money will be returned
without hesitation. All goods are marked in plain figures the lowest
from which no abatement can be made.

The Establishments are closed from sunset Friday to sanest on
Saturdays, when business is resumed till Twelve o'clock.
A new Book, entitled " The World's Pharos," containing the
Emigrant's Assistant, full list of prices, and directions for self-mea-
surement, may be had on application, or post-free, to any part
of the kingdom.

A handsome Almanac for the year ending 1852 can be had, gratis,
on application.

loi I'on Pule Francais. I Qui si parla Italian.liter spxlcht roan Deutsch. I Aqua be habla r. gppuol.

IMPORTANT MEDICAL AND SURGICAL
street WORKS,
Just published, by U. Bailliere, 219, Regt-, London.
No I.
Second Edition, with. Additions,
Bvo., in cloth, price 55., by post free, ss. 6d.,
ON TRUE & FALSE SPERMATORRHMA ;
with the View to the Correction of wide-spread Errors
in relation to the Treatment and Cure of Sufferers from Debility of the
Generative System, or Sexual Ilypochondriasis.
Translated from the German of Dr. PICKFORD.
"Dr. Pickford is known to English readers by his frequent practi-
cal contributions to German medical literature. This is the first
time, he informs us, that he has addressed himself to the non-medi-
cal reader. We trust this may not be the last, if he shall
detect any other equally flagrant evil which it may be in his
power to correct."—London Medical Gazette, May 30, 1851.
—" The editor has conferred a great boon on the sufferers from this
distressing malady by translating this little book, and by laying bare
the scandalous practices of unqualified adventurers, who profess to
cure a disease of which they know nothing, with no other object
than to fill their own purses. The difference between tree Sperma-
torrhcea and the various forms of disease which resemble it are
accurately described, and thus a safe guide is offered for the
treatment of the malady."—Medical Circular, May 5, 1853.
—" We have delayed so long upon the contents of the preliminary
chapter, that we have scarcely left ourselves space for any notice of
he subject sr ocially treated of by Dr. Pickford ; but the moderate
price
eeyat which the • brochure' is sold, places it within the reach of
18,1811. e interested in the matter."—Dublin Medical Press, April

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

EQUITY COURTS.—Nov. 2.
(Before the Lord Chancellor.)
In consequence of the Lord Chancellor having re-
ceived the Judges, Queen's Counsel, &a, at breakfast,
as usuil, on the first day of this Term, his Lordship did
not take his seat in Court until half-past one o'clock.
At the sitting of the Court Vice-Chancellor Sir John
Stuart took the usual oaths. . .

Ills Lordship, after expressing a strong opinion in
favour of the continuance of the ancient feeling in favour
of Westminster Hall, and his wish that no separation
should apparently take place between the common law
and equity bars, acceded to the request of the bar as far
as regarded the present term, stating that he was much
influ.nvd in yielding to the request; made to him by the
fact of the other equity judges having to sit in chambers
at Lincoln's-ins.

The Court therefore sat this day at Lincoln's-inn.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCE—Nov. 2.
MELLoR V LOUGH AND LEATHER.

This was an action of replevin, tried before Mr. Justice
Wightman at the Liverpool Assizes, in which a verdict
had been given for the plaintiff.
Mr. James now moved for a rule of nisi to show cause
why that verdict, as against Lough, should not be set
aside. The facts of the case, which excited some atten-
tion at Liverpool, were as follows. A certain pony, the
subject matter of the action, had been in the possession
of Leather for a considerable time. The plaintiff Mellor
made a claim to the pony, and, some time before the
action was brought, he, with oue or two others, surrep-
titiously obtained possession of it from the defendant
Leather's stables. Upon this a complaint was made to
the police authorities, the parties were given into cus-
tody, and the pony detained by the defendant Lough,
who was a constable of the borough of Liverpool,
appointed under the Municipal Corporations Act. The
-charge having been dismissed, the magistrate exer-
cised the authority given to him, in regard to pro.
perty alleged to be stolen, by the 5 and 6 Vic., c. 116,
by making an order for the delivery of the pony to the
defendant Leather, and this order was carried into effect
by Lough, in whose custody the pony was. Thereupon
proceedings in replevin took place. The defendant
Lough at the trial pleaded the general issue, and the
learned judge ruled that the defence could not come in
under that plea. The learned counsel proceeded to com-
ment at some length upon the acts of Parliament relat-
ing to the privileges and pow, rs of constables appointed
under the Municipal Corporation Act, and upon the case
of " Haseldine v. Grove" (3 Q. B. Rep.), and one or two
others, when he was stopped by the Court, and a
Rule nisi granted.

:secretarye e
of
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.—Nov. 2.
HARRIS V. TIIOMPSON.—BLANDER.
Theon Nplaictrifoiplis
in this case was
the Brewersnd lnsurance Company, and also auditor to the
Lo
Company,butfbm in consequence
to
onsegti en
some charges made against him he was dismissed from
the first-named situation. The defendant was a director
in the Necropolis Company, and at
a meeting on the
23d of February, 1852, ho communicated to his brother
directors the fact of the plaintiff's dismissal, and pro-
posed that he should be also dismissed from the office of
auditor to the Necrerlia Company. The chairman in-
quired the grounds of the plaintiff's dismissal from the
secretaryship; when the defendant sail he was charged
with obtaining money under false pretences from the so-
licitors, and giving an I 0 U for a petty cash debt. This
was the slander upon which the action was founded,
but as it was uttered in a privileged communication from
the defendant to bis brother directors,. it was necessary,
to sustain the action, that the plaintiff should prove that
the defendant had acted maliciously.. Of this there was
no conclusive evidence, but the plaintiff proved that he
and his solicitor attended a meeting of the Necropolis
Company directors on the Bth of Mwhen arch, called for the
the defendant
purpose of investigating the matter,
refused to make any statement in the presence of the
plaintiff's solicitor, or of the plaintiff himself. The trial
took place before Chief Justice Jervis, at the sittings in
Middlesex after last term, when the jury were of opinion
that malice was proved, and they gave a verdict for the
plaintiff, damages 1501.
Mr. Serjeunt Boyles to-day moved to enter a verdict
for the defendant, or for a new trial, and submitted that
there was no evidence of malice to go to the jury, and
that an inuendo stated in the declaration was not sup-
ported in the evidence. As to the new trial, that was
asked for upon the ground that the evidence did not
warrant the jury in finding so large an amount of
damages.
The Chief Justice said ho thought the amount of
damages was very large.
Rule Nisi granted.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.—Nov. 2.
(Sittings in Banco.)
NORCAN V. CLIFTON, BART.
This action was tried before the Chief Baron at the
last sittings at Guildhall, when a verdict was found for
the plaintiff with 8001. damages.
Mr. Edwin James, on the part of the defendant, now
moved for a rule nisi for a now trial, on the ground that
the verdict was against the evidence, and upon affi-
davits.
The action was brought against Mr. Clifton (now Sir
Robert Clifton, son of the late Sir Jukes Clifton, of
Clifton-hall, Nottingham), to recover the stun of 1,000/.
due on a bill of exchange, which was given to a person
named Rowlands. It was pleaded that the bill was
given for a gambling transaction, and that no considera-
tion was paid for it lv the plaintiff; and that it had come
into his possession with a full knowledge of the circum-
stances under which it bad been obtained. The
facts of the case were as follows :—The plaintiff
was the keeper of a public-house at Nanty-
Glow, in Wales, and there Rowlands, who was edu-
cated as a surgeon, but spoken of as a sporting man,
became acquainted with the defendant, then a minor.
Mr. Rowlands afterwards visited at Clifton-hall, and it
was proposed that he should accompany Mr. Clifton
abroad, which he did, and diversified the journey up the
Rhino by winning 2,0001. of the defendant at dominoes.
No security was asked or given for this sum, at that
time; but in September, 1848, he went to Ireland, and
called on Mr. Clifton, who was then visiting his brother-
in-law, Sir Harvey Bruce. Mr. Clifton was in bed when
Rowlands called, but he accepted two bills, each for
1,0001., dated 22d September, 1848, and payable on de-
mend, but which Rowlands pledged his word should not
be presentad till after the death of Sir Jukee, or nego-
tiated. One of the bills afterwards passed to the present
plaintiff, and one to a person named Williams. The
plaintiff was called at the trial, and endeavoured to
prove that the consideration for which the bill had
been given was a sum of 800/. 6s. 2d., which he
declared was duo to him from Rowlands, and had
been owing for seven or eight years previously. The
principal items of the bill were " brandy and water " and
" horses." Morgan admitted on cross-examination that
he knew Rowlands was insolvent, and that be could not
have advanced any money for the bills. He also ad-
mitted that on one night in January, 1851, Rowlands
had come to him and asked him to keep the bills for him
in his safe. It was afterwards arranged that Morgan
should hold one of them for the tavern bill in question.
The affidavits on which the learned counsel moved, set
forth that Rowlands, wbo would have been a most im-
portant witness, had kept out of the way, and Morgan
admitted, on cross-examination, that the evening before
the trial he had dined with Rowlands at Wood's Hotel,
Furnival's Inn, and that he had also breakfasted with
him there on the following morning, the day of the
trial. Four several journeys had been made into Wales
to endeavour to subpoena Rowlands.
The Lord Chief Baron—You may take a rule upon
both points.—Rule nisi accordingly.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.—Noy. 2.
(Bcfore Mr. Commissioner Holroyd.)
IN RE PRRNTICE. _

Mr. Hubbard, on behalf of the ;assignees in this case,
made an application under the following cironmstances;
—The bankrupt had obtained his certificate several
years ago, ho had since come into the possession of con-
siderable property, and having paid all his creditors in
full was desirous of a properly classified certificate under
the new act. The old certificate lay at his (Mr. Hub-
bard's) office; and, what was more strange, there was
a large surplus in the hands of the official assignee,
after payment in full of all the creditors, for which the
bankrupt declined to apply.
His Honour said ,he had no power to interfere ; the
certificate already issued must stand.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT,--Noy. 3.
(Before Mr. Commissioner Law.)
IN THE MATTER CF MANUEL ENDINE DURUP.

This insolvent, who had been in no business or pro-
fession applied to be discharged. Mr. Sargood opposed.
The insolvent was entitled, under the will of his fa-
ther, on the death of his panther, to considerable funded
property. In November, 1850, the insolvent was indicted
by his mother for stealing some articles of grocery, of
the value of 155., and before trial she died. Her depo-
sitions were admitted in evidence, and he was convicted
at the sessions, and sentenced to 21 days, imprisonment.
By his mother's death he became entitled to the property
lett under his father's will. The crown had, as he was
convicted of felony, made a claim to the same, and va-
rious negotiations had been pending between the solici-
tor of the Treasury and his attorney, and it was antici-
pated that the crown would relinquish the claim, and
that the property would come to him. He had given
mortgages to some of his creditors on the property in
question.
Mr. Commissioner Law required some further evidence
on the subject, and the case was adjourned.