The Sun.
London, England, 1852-03-03 00:00:00

LLOYD'S SIIIPPING--(THIS DAY.)
LOND,)N, MARCH 3.—Wind at noon N., fresh breeze,
and fine clear, dry wk ather.
QUEENSTOWN, MARCH I.—Wind N.W.—Arrd. Coro-
mandel, Callao; Prospect, ditto; Coutes, Laguna for
A, tone.
Fai,mouTH, MARCH 2.—Wird W,N.W.—Arrd. Mer-
curios,6 Vioto. Off port, Abel Gower, Callao
f. r Abirtie,.,n; Mary, Calcutta; Clotilde,
SOUTHAMPTON, 'MARCH 2.—Wily Thames
steamer, West Indies.
COWES, MARCH 2.—Wind N.E.—Sld. Fairlie, Hobart
Town.
BRISTOL, MARCH 2.—Wind N.W.—Arrd. Queen of
the Ocean, New York; Isabella Smart, St. Andrew's,
New Brunswick; Falcon, ditto.
NEWPORT.—SId. Kitty, Bermuda.
CLYDE.—SId. Gondola, Trinidad; Mountaineer, Sa-
vannah.
RAMSGATE, MARCH 2.—Wind N.N.W.—Arrd. Maria,
Loudon for Jamaica, very leaky, and part of crew re'
fusing to work.
PORTSMOUTH, MARCH 2.—Wind W.N.W. to N.N.E.
Essex, Madras and Calcutta.
SCILLY, MARCH I.—Wind \V.N.W._Arrd. Costello,
New Orleans, very leaky; crew sick.
DEAL, MARCH 2.—Wind N.W.; Noon, N.N.E.;
N.E., fine—Arrd. Woodbridge, Singapore. Arrd. from
the River and sld. Madagascar, Calcutta; Ellen, Sierra
Leone; Eliza Sharp, St. Kitts. Ski. Strive, Porto Rico;
Bhck .Nytaph, ditto.
LIVERPOOL, MARCH 2.—Wind E.N.E._Arrd. Ame-
rica New York; Consbrook, Corisco; Barkhill, Pa-
raiba, sld. Jan. 20, and left no English vessels there;
Falcon,Saxon, N
ditto; ew
ciOrleans;ara sAisle,ines
eGr
,1 as e n :
ditto;Courier, ditto; Wil"
liam Hitchcock, Apalachicola; Anne, Charleston; AA"
made, ditto; A. Cheeseborough, Baltimore and St•
Thomas's. Off port, Asia, Mobile; City of Manchester
steamer, Philadelphia; George Glin, William Parke!'
Asmante steamer, Cannata, kiebe, and William Per'e'
Sld. Emerald steamer, Africa; William Fisher, •Valps"
raiso; Dcuison, Antigua; Everton, Jamaica; IV
elift/ra'
Boston.

MARKET ZNE WS.-( THIS D

CORN EXCHANGE—WEDNESDAY
coasti
The arrivals or English Wheat since MondaYt
wise and by land carriage, having been limited, we ba
a very small show of samples here to-day; nevertheless.
the demand for all descriptions, as the attenda or
buyers was on the decrease, ruled inactive, at
barely equal to those obtained last week. For forward
delivery very few transactions were reported. The jai'
ports of foreign Wheat have been confined to 1,440
quite as
quarters. Selected qualities were scarce, and
dear. In other kinds very little business was transated.
We had a steady, though not a brisk, inquiry for mailing
Barley, whilst grinding and distilling sorts were quite al
dear. The Malt trade was dull, but no decline took Pitelei
in prices. The transactions in Oats were liberal, 51 a
currencies. The stock. held by dealers are considere
small. Beans, Peas, and Indian Cora were held at lat°
rates. Fine Flour was steady, but low country woks
prices
were rather difficult of disposal.
ARRIVALS THIS WEEK

ARRIVALS THIS wza...n.
Flour.
Wheat. Barley. Malt. 1 Oats.
h--- --- -- --_--- ------sacia.
Qrs. Qrs. Qrs. Qrs• 920
Enos)/ •• •• • • 1,2'0 1,560 1,110 2
47U ,430
—1, 2 00510
Irish •••• •• •• 403
Foreign .. .. i 1,440 630 1 2:6_l_o____2
,3:2........)' blil

BOROUGH HOP MARILET.
For most kinds of Hops we have only a moderate
inquiry, yet last week's prices are steadily supported•
WEITECELEIPEZ.
Prime Beef and Mutton were in fair request, et fall
quotations. Otherwise, the demand ruled neavy• Reel
from 2s 2d to 3s 2d; Mutton, 2s 6d to 3s Sdi Y,
3s 2d to 4s; Pork, 2s 4d to 3s 8d per 81bs by the carcase,

CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)
The Lord Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor Nindersll.
did not Bit to-day, in consequence of attending the lete

The argument inn this cas.e,
ROLLS' COURT.--(THIS DA"
I.lGTori t, lioGuToN.
the Court • for nearly five entire days, resumed thlg
was
mornin,,s.
The b.' ill was filed by of 13g1:a
Hall, in Henryenry Hoghton, sq.,.
the county of Lancaster, against his father, P'r
enr Bold Hoghton, of Hoghton Tower, in th° °Arils°
runtyf (other persons interested being also defendant's;
or the purpose of setting which has now occupie.d
aside a deed of settlemen•
executed by the plaintiff on the 7th July, 1843, ahinitd
year after he attained his majority, and which he twe'ae
he had been induced to execute through the infiaeri" '
control, and misrepresentation of his father. , ars
It appeared from the statements of counsel tnat e--i
vious to the year 1840 Sir Henry Iloghton, in righati °of
his wife, Lady Hoghton, was in receipt of the reni"„nut
the Bold estate in Lancashire, amounting Will' i)- - .
12,000/. ; but upon, the death of Lady Hoght",,:ll„,,- ee
camber of that year, the plaintiff, as her first son, became
entitled as tenant in tail to these estates, he being t'''' her
of the age of 19 years. Within a few days aft ,t,
death the plaintiff executed a deed, appointing his .--,bee
his guardian during his minority. At this 61263: 0
plaintiff was also entitled as tenant in tail,
the decease of his father, to the Hoghton estates, Of i t
value of about 8,000/. a year, subject to the life interes
of fits father. The Bold estate was altogether unencuta, -_
bared, but the Hughton estate was subject to incrtgebi!
to the Bank of England, Sir R. Peel, and others, too 0%1
eXpatOlll, °be
amount of 81,4001., the annual interest of which touted
to nearly 3,5001,, and was payable out of the in' produce
of
these estates, thus reducing the net annual
them receivable by Sir henry to about
ed by Lady
result of this state of circumstances, produc
~,.
became
Hoghton's death in 1840, was that the plaiptil
year,
spotted in possession to estates worth 12,000 a
___
whilst by the same event the income of Sir Henry wal
d 21 on
reduced to 4,5001. a year. The plaintiff all
deed „,,.
2d August, 1842, and on the 3d he executed a
..30i'lle.
4,5001. The
entailing the Bold estates, and thereby enlarejog his twee
terest in them to an absolute estate in fee, and
°of
.11_0.
4th he executed to his father, Sir Henry,
annuity of 2,500/, a year, which, however, was toaweo
teraiine on the plaintiff's discharging out of his a a.,
moneys the mortgages then, affecting the "Itis° eel
21, Su'.
tates. Previously to his son attaiuing brick,
had entered into a negotiation with Charles Searle s
..,‘
E,q„ for sale to him of a portion of the Bold estated3lovi
a grant
which the plaintiff had become entitled by the oho
his mother, called the North Meols estate, 82CI bad,..nge-
instructed his solicitor, Mr. Walker, to to usriec- tog
clients for paying off the mortgages to
the Hoghton estates out of the Money e
_._..
be produced
tbiriii,cahn,
date
at hrreiesdumintoof
by the sale of this proneirrs'Yes
Ultimately, in the month of October, 1842,,,a "sears
elff32ec,oto;oaLn, d
1.11
for the sale of the North Meols estate to -0417 lan
was signed by the F .. . ,
the moat :3 exe-
bruary, 1843, a conveyance of the propertY 000 y Of
cuted ; and 81,400/., part of the purchase incuoullt °f
132,0001., was applied in discharge of
tbsl
t:tes. lies
mortgage debt then affecting the tioghton es
executed,
conveyances of those mortgages were the,ir
flag,
which had been prepared by the solicitor of ° mortgage
the effect of which were to merge the whole
entirely
debt so as to exonerate the Hoghton estate
.__.ed;
therefrom, instead of keeping it on foot for the los?_.„
of the plaintiff, which he alleged ought totshave been
of
done; and, accordingly, one of the obj of le!,
suit is to procure a declaration from the court,
el:
these mortgages are subsisting charges for the ben 137
that() object is tO
of the plaintiff. But the more imme
nt of the Hoghton
set aside the deed of re-settleme
1843, which it was stated was
estates, dated 7th July,
under the following circumstance&
prepared and executed
1842, the arrangements foro
In the month of December,
discharging the debt on the. Hoeton estates out of tha
proceeds of part of the plaint property having been
completed, the defendant, Sir Henry, determined that t,
d 1
platnti -If should re-settle these estates, and instructed ht
Walker, to prepare a settlement accordingli•
solicitor, Mr.
On the 7th ot July, 1843, the settlement in question wall
executed by the plaintiff in the presence of Mr. walker
and a Mr. rilkington, in the bed-room of Sir Henry,v,"
at that time was suffering from severe indispositioo.
having a few days previously broken a blood-vessel
Mr. Walker deposed teat, although he never saw the
"'nit Lion' forormrecrived any letter, or other written consnsa;
him with reference to 'that don, drat-
it, yet
of the settlement was sent to Sir Henryin LOD vvith
whom theplaintiff 3'
was then living, for several months
previouslyto its execution,
and that there
to prevent the l . d
p anatiff from having seen i 6 an perusedso
it, and '
it. consulted his la,her with reference
wss
The purport of this deed of re-settlement
stated Os
to be to cut down the plaint
interest in these
large estates from an estate tail to atai
estate for life, and that by it large benefits were secured
to the defendant, Sir Henry Hoghton, and his secon.
wife, the pres•nt Lady Hoghton, without the less!
benefit or advantage to the plaintiff, and povvers werl;
reserved to him which would enable him to dispose 0'
the estates in fee in the event of his surviving the plain,:
tiff, and the plaintiff dying without issue male, and void,
was theretore contended that this settlement was voluo
and the plaintiff ought to be put in the same positine
with reference to the Hoghton estates as ho was in befor
he executed it. On the part of the defendant, Sir
resents
Heanel
l'
it was contended that there had been no miiirep.g'
Lion or concealment, that it had long been the ietention_
of the plaintiff to execute such a settlement, that it ill
nothing but what, from the altered circumstances 1",
the defendant, occa,ioned by the death of his wife' a
sense of duty to his father and his younger brothers 00,w
0
sisters would dictate, and such as was constantly 1", Inu.,
in families of distinction upon the oldest son coin
of age, e.
d
Mr. Bethel!, NTr. Follett, and Mr. Bazalgette appear
for the plaintiff; Mr. Roussell, Mr. Rift, and 'Ms. Gad
riano for the defendant; Sir Henry Bold
116ghton, in!
Mr, Roundel! Palmer, and Mr. Charles Hall,
for
infant Cecil Hoghton, who claims to be interested
a.cs;.
first tenant in tail under the deed of settlement sought
I
be impeached. /IP
Mr. BETITELL this morning commenced his r
.0
winch is ,expected to occupy the greater part, if net '
whole, of the day.
-------

MIDDLESEX SESSIONS.
(THIS DAY.)
James Skinner, an omnibus conductor, agfd °
respectable appearance, was found guilty of erabezzlivi
various sums of money, the property of his master o,ll'
emAnother
'Yr. Johnof Holloway!
conductor` was convicted of a similar charge!
and the Judge, after a severe address, sentenced them
to twelve months' imprisonment with hard labour.
-

It was generally rumoured yesterday- at the Cit..—
that Mr. Villiers, at the personal request of Lord John Eusi
sell, had consented to withdraw the ill-advised motion
which, when smarting under the effects of Lord eerb,YA
§tatCliliCkit,U9 POI WV Lacuna 4:siva ligtio-oer"