The Sun.
London, England, 1864-01-27 00:00:00

essrs, Bright a.nd S. chok,field at

Birmingham,

BIIIMINGLiAM, Tuesday Evening.
Bdght, M.P., ar.d Mr. Schol4eld, M.P.,
attended a meeting in the Townhall this evening,
for the purpose of addressing their constituents on
public affairs. The hall was crowded in every part.
Mr. HOLLIDAY, the Mayor of Birmingham, occu-
pied the chair, and having briefly opened the pro-

equal riist,ribet ion of his property mnog his child
ma than the law itself would make. It is thus that
laws tt e..nselve s—the ei eetnto o public opinion—
often powerfully react upon it. The writer goes
on to show that the effect of the change had been to
alter the dist t ibution of land. It lessened the chances
of ever being so enormously rich, and it gave much
greater chancre for moderate riches and comfort ;
and that if there were fewer coaches-and-six in the
State of Virginia, there were twenty times as many
carriages and pairs. (Cheers and laughter.) The
question of primogeniture I have briefly touched on.
The question of entail is much on the same footing.
I will only say a word or two on the subject. The
object of entailing land is to keep great estates to-
gether, and to keep them in one family. Under this
system land in this country is sometimes tied up for
fifty, eighty, or one hundred years, and no person
has the power to sell it, however advantageous it
may be to the proprietors themselves and to the pub-
lic that the land should be sold. (Hear, hear.) And
then we come to the difficulties of the question of
transfer. If you will ask gentlemen who are near
me, who are connected with the law, they will tell
you that it always takes months, and sometimes
sears, to provide a title, and of course that has no
inconsiderable effect in increasing the amount of the
purchase-money. (Cheers.) Now, may I ask what
are the particular reasons for which this state ei
things is maintained ? It is for the very reason for
which this system was established 800 years ago that
there may be in this country a handful of persons—
twice as many, perhaps, as there are in this room,
who are the owners of nearly all the land in the
country—in whose hands is concentrated nearly all
the power, and by whom the government of the
country is mainly conducted, and amongst whom the
patronage of the Government is mainly distributed.
(Loud cheers.) In every country of the world as far
as I know, the possessors of land are the possessors
of power. In France at this moment we all know
perfectly well that notwithstanding there may be a
revolution now and then in the streets of Paris,
still if you come to the grenter question of voting,
of the opinion of numbers, the proprietors of the
land of France are the vast majority of the voting
population, and ten or twelve years ago it was
their suffrages that conferred the supreme
power upon the present Emperor of the French. (A.
Voice—That's a lie. Laughter.) If you cross the
Atlantic and study the political system of the
United States, where almost all the farmers are the
owners of their farms, you will find that they are
the holders of political power. The city of New
York, through its mayor, it may be at one time, or
the governor of the State at another, and the news-
papers of New York may denounce the policy of
the Government at Washington ; but it is not the
tenant but the land-owning farmers and cultivators
of the great States in the interior of the country who
ate the depositories of political power, by whose will
alone the President of the United States is able to
carry on the great matters which belongs to his
exalted station—(cheers)—and it is the same in the
Southern States—for the great planting population
—the great owners of plantations, are the life and
soul of the disorders which are now unhappily
reigning in those States. If you come to your own
country, if you come to your own county of War-
wick, you will find that two or three landowners
can sit down and determine who shall or who shall
not go to Parliament in the pretended representa-
tion of the population of this county. (Cries of
Shame.) I believe that these vast properties, which
are of no real advantage to those who hold them—
for £lOO,OOO or £200,000 can give no more real
happiness than £lO,OOO or £5,000 a-year—l believe
that these great properties give groat political
power, and this, which we call our great territorial
system,prevails to an extent iu this country which is
probably unknown in any other, and leaves the cul-
tivators of the soil ignorant and hopeless and de-
graded. (Cheers.) There is a great tendency to
larger farms throughout the country, which makes
it still more difficult even for a labourer even to be-
come a tenant, or even to rise above his present
condition. An illustration occurs to me which I
once before used in this room. I see a ladder—e
social ladder—up which I want to see the poor,
and depressed, and unfortunate nine-shil-
lings or ten-shillings a week labourer
ascend gradually. I should rejoice to see him
getting up a few steps and becoming a farmer,
even in a small way, or becoming the owner of a
piece of land; but I find that at six, or eight, or
ten feet every stave of the ladder is broken out, and
from his low position he has no chance of ascending.
Let there be slipa of small farms and small estates,
and let land generally bo bought and sold, and then
the labourer will have something to hope for, some-
thing to save even his small savings for, and by
chance some of them may find their way from their
humble and melancholy position to one which I
wish from my soul every labourer in the country
could occupy, (Loud cheers.) Now, for fear that
that the man in the mask—he has got his mask on
again for a time—(laughter)—for fear the man in
the mask sh uld misrepresent my views, let me tell
you that I am not against great estates, or great
farmers, or great properties, or great factories ; but
I have a great desire to see small estates, and small
farmers, and small factories. In this country,
where there is such a great creation of wealth, there
is always a groat desiro for the accumulation of land.
I know the case of a nobleman—it is in a southern
county—l am speaking from public report—who is
said to have .C 120,000 a year, but who being a wise
man as regards his expenditure, only spends £40,000
a year; bat it is a mystery to me how he does it.
(Laughter.) He has thus £BO,OOO a year left, and
what does he do with it ? Why he buys every farm,
every estate that offers; and thus his estate is gra-
dually growing bigger. 1 don't blame him for that.
I applaud him in this respect, that he is a man who
does not waste his property ; and I have always
heard the nobleman to whom I refer bears an excel-
lent character in the neighbourhood where he lives.
There are persons who come from Manchester and
from Leeds, and I hope from Birmingham, who can
purchase considerable estates. These is always a
tendency in this country, especially where we have
so much manufacturing and commercial industry
and wealth, to buy estates. There possessions give
great social position and great political influence. I
am not complaining of this; it is a natural, and a
just, and a healthy thing; it is desirable that the
farmer should have the stimulus of ambition to
acquire larger farms, and that those possessing
estates should wish to acquire larger estates.
This is the stimulus that leads men to strive for some-
thing honourable in this country. But to have all these
influences working in that direction, and to add to this
influence the force of a most intricate and complicated sys-
tem of law—to give all these forces greater forces, is in
my opinion contrary to all the true interests of England ;
and I believe that if it goes on in this way for another
half century as it has been for the last half century it may
cause discontent and great embarrassment within this now
peaceful kingdom, (Cheers.) What I propose is this—it
is the most moderate that can be proposed. If you want
to see an admirable description of what I think it would be
wise to do you will find it in a paper which certainly is
not very Radical—l mean the Spectator—a weekly Lon-
don newspaper. There was an article on landowners in
the State of New York. The writer says with regard to
certain changes, " No doubt Mr. Bright did not consider
them sufficient for his purposes and wishes." Now he is
quite mistaken. The changes which ho proposes are more
extensive than any changes which I ever proposed, either
in public or private. What aro these changes P First of
all, that the law shall declare that when any person owning
landed property dies without making a declaration of it by
will the law shall distribute it on the same principle that it
now adopts with any other kind of property. For example,
suppose a man has got money in the bank, and I wish
everybody had-'(cheers and laughter)—suppose ho has
machinery in a mill, or merchandise in a warehouse, or
shares and parchments in his safe—when he dies the law
makes a distribution of all that property in accordance as I
believe with the principle of parental affection and justice.
I say let that principle be extended to all property of which
a man may die possessed. In that respect I want to go no
farther. (Cheers.) With regard to the qUestion of en-
tai's, I would say this—the Spectator proposes that a
man may entail his property so as to prevent his heir
and tho next heir from disposing of it—that is, that
there shall only be two parsons in the entail. I only
propose this, that a man may leave his property to
any persons who may be living at the time he makes his
will. But at present he can leave it to a number of people,
and to the child unborn, and which may not be born until
20 years after the making the will. I would alfer that sys-
tem. I should be content to have the property left to per-
sons in existence, and whose names should appear in the
will ; and you will not find as A, B, or C died off that the
property would come into the hand of a man who would
have the absolute disposal of it. (Cheers.) That is whall

want to see done, and I believe it would be better for the

public if the freedom was given to the owners of land what
is given to the possessors of other property. (Loud cheers,)

There is one other point on which I wish to melee a remark.
The man who buys and the man who sells property finds
the law regulating the transfer so complicated, that if Sslo-

mon himself were here he could not come to any fair deci-
sion about it except that very curious one which he is re •

ported to have done upon another point. (Cheers and laugh-

er.) Now, everything which I am proposing is carried out

to a somewhat greater extent in the United States, in most

of the States, and to a greater extent on the continent of
Europe; and it is being carried out in all tho Australian

colonies. It is, the most curious thing in the world that
whenever an Englishman leaves these shores, whether it be
the effect of the salt air, or of sea sickness, or of that pro-

longed meditation which a long voyage invites, he seems
to peel off, not the rags of his body, but the verminous rags
off his intellect and soul; he lands in Australia with his

eyes perfectly clear, and he can see things in a common-
sense manner. (Laughter and cheers.) Now, I want to
ask you, as reasonable men and men of business, if there is
a man here who cannot understand the question mode-
rately well in the way in which I have endeavoured to put
it. Is this spoliation? Is this agrarian outrage ? Is
this stimulating working men and the agricultural

labourer to—what shall I say ?—ineendiarism or

anything else he may have recourse to ? It is nothing
of the kind. It is laying before them just principles

of law, admitted to be just in every other country in
the world except this, and which we admit to be just

. .
in regard to everything else, charged with all sorts of dread-
ful things by that gentleman in the mask, On the 27th of
November he wrote this about Mr. Cobden :—" He (Mr.
Cobden) stoops down and picks up a missile which h as never
yet been used but for anarchy and for revolution. Is it not
in effect to tell the labourer and the workman to look over
the fence of the labouring proprietor, and to learn them to
think they have a natural right to a slice of the soil?" The
law steps in and maakes it difficult to sell and to buy ; then
I say that labourer has a right to look over the hedge and to
feel that the law deals a grievous injustice—(loud cheers)—

and it is this gentleman in the mask that frightens the
landed proprietors. I met the other day with a gentleman
connected with one of the largest properties in the kingdom.
He said to me (and he is a very liberal and thoughtful man),

" You have no idea of the terror which y,air speeches create

among the landed gentlemen." (Laughter.) I never
frighten any of my neighbours. I do not know why I should

be so alarming to those gentlemen who live in their great
houses a►nd their castles ; but the fact is, that the landed
gentlemen are not a wise class. (Laughter.) There are

brilliant exceptions. (Rear, hear.) There are many men
amongst them who cannot be surpassed by any of their class,
or of any class in the world ; but as a class—and perhaps
one might say it of nearly every class—l believe it is true of
the class to which I belong in Lancashire, they are not a

wise class. They know something of agriculture. County
members have to get it up for agricultural dinners—(laugh-
ter and cheers)—and they know something about horses,
and they know all that can be known on the subject of
game. (Laughter and cheers.) Well, on the principles
of law and of government, speaking of them as a whole,
and judging of them by their past force, they are dark
as night itself. Would you believe that the landed
proprietors never found out, till Mr. Cobden and I and a
few others told them, that the corn law was a great
injury to them. (Laughter and cheers.) They did not
know that it actually diminished the value of the land
and diminished the security of their rents, and that
it loaded them with an inconceivable amount of odium.
whilst at the same time it beggared hundreds of thousands
of the people, and it menaced this nation with revolution.
(Cheers.) Mr. Cobden and others who acted with us—
chiefly perhaps because we were the most prominent—were
slandered then, and by the gentleman in the mask, just as
we have been now. (Cheers.) The Times was as foul-
mouthed upon us 20 years ago as it is now. (Cheers.) They
said that we went about the country eetting class against
class. (Cries of "True," and "Shame.") They said that
our views led to the confiscation of landed property. They
said, in fact, everything that was spiteful and untrue, as
they say now; and yet is there a man in this country who
will not admit that property is more secure in consequence
of the abolition of that law which they believed to be the
anchor of their safety, that animosities between class and
class have been allayed ; and who shall tell how much it is
owing to that that our Queen at this moment wields an un-
challenged sceptre over a tranquil realm ? (Great cheering.)
A landowner in the House of Commons, an old member of
the house, a representative of a south-western county, a man
of excellent character, for whom I have always had the
greatest respect, even when he was the most wrong—(hear)
—said to me not long ago, speaking about the corn laws,
they didn't then know the good we were doing to his class.
(Laughter.) I nuged him and said " Well, if you would
only have faith 1 could tell you one or two other things—
(laughter)—that would do you just as much good if you
would let us try them." (Cheers.) But he had not faith.
(Great laughter.) Now I will just say to the landowners
that I never was more their friend than in discussing this
question as I am doing to-night without the least animosity
to them—(laughter)—and with a belief as firm as I ever had
on the questionof the corn laws, that their interests are bound
up with the interests of the people in the right solution of
this question. (Cheers.) I would ask to what are they tend-
ing under the operation of these laws ? They are becoming
every year smaller and smaller in numbers—the large ones are
rapidly eating up the small ones. The census returns show
that the number of landed proprietors is but a handful in
the nation, and every day becoming fewer and fewer. Their
labourers remain at the old nine or ten shillings a •week.
Somebody will write to the papers to-morrow and say they
get twelve shillings—(laughter)—but bear in mind that
they do not always receive wages on wet days— (loud
laughter)—and I believe that the average money income of
the agricultural labourer throughout the United iingdom
will not exceed, and many persons will say it will not reach,
ten shillings per week. The smaller in number these landed
proprietors become, the more, it may be, these labourers
become discontented, There may arise some political acci-
dents, and political accidents come almost as unlookel for
as other accidents. You do not hear the tread of the earth-
quake which topples down your finest arehiteeture, and the
country gentlemen do not see the tread of that danger—it
may be that catastrophe which inevitably follows upon pro-
longed unjust legislation. (Cheers.) And there may come
a time--and I durst prophesy that it will come if there be
au obstinate retention of our present system—when there
will be a movement in this country to establish not what I
believe to be the just, moderate, and sufficient plan which 1
recommend, but a plan which shall bo in accordance with
that which is established by the Code Napoleon in France,
and which is spreading rapidly over the whole continent V,
Europe. I would ask them again how do they propose to
keep their population if this system is to be maintained. And
now 1 beg the attention of you working men who are here to
two oe three observations upon this point. America, though
3,000 miles off, is not so far off but that people may go over
there in about 12 days, and they may go there for a sum
varying from £.2 to £5. During the year that has just
passed, I think 150,000 or 160,000 persons have sailed from
this country to New York. (Bravo and cheers.) Every
man who settles there is not blinded by mystifi cations and
falsehoods of the New York Correspondent of the Times.
(Cheers.) He is there, and can see what the working man
gets, how he is considered, and what he is, and ho writes
over to his friends in this country, as has been .the case for
years in Ireland, and the result has been that Ireland has
been drained not of its surplus population, but of tlae popu-
lation actually necessity to the proper cultivation of the
soil. (Loud cheers) Now let me tell you a fact, and if you
do not treasure it up in your minds, I hope one of those
gentlemen, the landowners, who think I am very hostile to
them, will just think it over, if he has time, as he eats his
breakfast to-morrow or next day. (Laughter.) In America
there are at this moment 140 millions of acres of land sur-
veyed, mapped, and set apart for those who are ready to
settle upon them. In the year 1861, that was the first year
after this war attained its present proportions, there were
not less than 40,000 new farms, over 80 acres each, occupied
in the Western States; but the Government of the United
States, not content with that measure of progress, passed
an act which came into operation on Jan. 1, 1863, which
was called the Homestead Act. I have a copy of the act
here, and I have a copy also of the circular which was issued
at the same time. What is that Homestead Act? It is this
—it says that any man or woman, 21 years of age, or
younger, if the man happened to have been for a fortnight
or a month in the service of the United States—whether in
the army or navy, may go into these territories, may choose
what is called a " section," which is 150 acres of land, being
one-fourth of a square mile, and on payment of a fee of
10 dols., which is equal to £2 English, he may apply and
have this land oonveyed to him for no other payment for
five years, and it cannot be aliene.ted. Ho is not allowed to
sell it, It remains in his possession, and at the end of five
years—he having done to it what the Government requires,
that is, settled upon it and begun cultivation, and so forth
—then the law gives him what is called a patent, but which
is, in fact, what we call a Parliamentary title—the land is
absolute freehold for ever. (Cheers.) Now, it would not
take more than £l5 for a man to go from Birmingham
'to the territory where this land is to be disposed
of. if he had not got any money by which he could
take up the 160 acres, and begin to cultivate it, and would
engage himself to a neighbouring farmer, he would
get, I believe, now about 20s. per week wages, besides
his bard and lodging; and if he worked as a labourer for
two or three years he would be able to save a small sum,
sufficient for him to commence the cultivation of a portion
of his farm, and ho would be settled down there as a farmer
and as a freeholder, (Loud cheers.) Now, do not let me
leave you with the idea that there is no rough end rugged
career in this. There is much that is rough and much that
is rugged. But there is a good deal of that in this country
now. (Cheers.) When a man looks upon those children
that make, even in the poorest house, sometimes a gleam
of joy—when he thinks what these boys and girls must be
in this country—never to rise one step higher than that
which he occupies now as agricultural labourers ; and then
ho looks abroad and he sees them not labourers in the sense
that we use the word here—not tenants even, but freehol-
ders, and landowners, and farmers of their own property,
then I say that the temptation held out to men here to emi-
grate, if he knew all the facts, would be irresistible to hun-
dreds and thousands who have now no thought of moving
to another country, Even our agricultural labourer's con-
dition ie improyQd in some rcispeCta. Tltcre are some feeble

13emffa;retrse
anpotshsieble. They find their way into agricultural villagesers
tohifoeurgmhotreit? was. and
to
see labourers will gradually begin to open their e7bie
offerUn it c oncedySt ats
mpuabaleisthoegaila'et
abirrr---",a, little instruction. TherearerOs'
as cithe that a changperioefetwhehiirepho'sviatisenaiscinnoettisonlieM:emeel:
political equality—they offer to to every child of ev.gell_f;
in whose face I am now looking education from the I 31',.i.
of his alphabet up to, if he has the capacity to travel e. :,
offered
ehighest knowledge of classics and mathematics wilics'.
a to the best students in the colleges of this coutin)_,
and II that without the payment of one single farthitg:
except that general payment in which all the peaplo par:
Now
wr
swochiaaltegisuailittyll--stibei
ticipateunio in the school-rate of the various States m°f, to
Well, now, I ask you if I am wrong in sa/V,;of
theirown and to the great, that T believe,
the richn. if they
tl': to
make interest, it would be worth their while to
of),ice
this country a more desirable one for the poor t I,
in.
who (Cheers.) If they disregard this great quetioa,;,
povisterri,
are of the middle class—or not absolutely
andtrym e 1111
1. a
class—shall have to decide between the claims nf iba 0'
tol I meet tiled
lb;
magnates and tThheejruesatrreigehootsleorfameni_llions of oar cos
then--and I wonder where they were born, Int 01
they came into the world, who regard these territ: jo
magnateshu as idols before whom we are all to bps./ de/ 0 •
mble submission. I think travellers tell us tb_er°tthey
tribe in Africa so entirely given up to sap that
tn° 4)
fill their huts and hovels with so many idols that tilielbi;
not leave room for their families. It reaY be so -1101°
country, that we build up a system which is detrimen
_lO
ourtphooligtirceaalt fmreaeedsomoi
oaunrd ipsroddeasteriuncgtive of thekbieeggr;c4,
and wet' e for
~ _. ow, am I the enemy of any class if cols
ilci,
(Cheers 1 N
ward to state facts like these, and to explain Prilicii)Aidet3:o3
asthese ? Shall we go groping continually in the ''''t or
omaking no effort to strengthen our position ? De 11:It Oil
pose because because I stand here I love better to find fell'oleo
aws
of
my
country than to praise there, that 1 am
with English and less patriotic, or that I have less eY,,,,raloe.
country and my countrymen than other 03'., or
ful,(Ch eaemrdsy.) I want our country to be populous, to be. 1.7„,,55i
nevernto be happy ; but this end can only be
'utlistO
has been attained in any country blit bliiieas ,db.
justly administered. I plead only for what I 5 yearslelb
just.sto I wish to do wrong to no an. For 25broalll
od before audiences, great meetings of ray neli"-; tli"
tpleadingm only for justice. (Loud cheers.) Dal; i*
you know, I have endured measureisee
need tiO
Ii hea'v as
tellrich you
asn thatpassedt e
mthyroeulgiehatheurhraicvaeneasootf
gabeauesrae.iiiior ittostillgii,
(Hear, hear.) groat, but rather the poor and and diri,
They cannotgive rape plac'e lie'
nities and wealth ; but their honourable serf'. 11/
me that which is of far higher and more isstillclplioli,
the
mucedonne.rsoc io(ofTusshineneasis thatare
not
t lhaveless
beenth ecso pr
notuu nsdnicintag :1 ado? i:
ng laws which, though they were not giveilt i 6cv'
and not less intended to promotesand secure tbe Wiilft`3
st 0
hon. gentleman resumed ors se
A vote of thanks to Mr. Scholefield an
re -:
tight
cheering.) d gr. err
subsequently carried, and the proceedings we
a termination at half-past ten o'clock.
—.OO

COUNTRY MASTO

BRISTOL—TUESDAY• o,afiff
There was a full attendance of the trscle„lviEWO
everything was held firmly, with a fair colls"

SHEFFIELD—TnVIDAY' t ite tP;ril
There was a full average show of grain/ I?cties ireread/D`.
wheat ruled extremely dull, and former TheePrl e ,I
maintained. Other articles also dull. ~olr6
was unusually small. .a 00
tor
,150 l
Red wheat, par load of 3 imperial bushed'' rs 0 li 6.1
i oto si
White .' los
„, 1
If 1
New red ''.179:„„v"t01,,9i1i
/
New white 11 11 1,15611:tt0T6
Beans , ff ..osuis4
It
Grinding barley, per qr .................. :34: 01101' '4
I\lalting ditto, 9 I ........... .... 190
.
Oats ), .............. ~.
.. ,
it),
Flour, Is 4d to le Sd per

Jr)'l
f pi,
LEED S—TuEsDAY. 00'4 i,l
There are good arrivals of grain boh,l ol7redi
this week. The wheat trade to-day ooni,'",,beotit,:ditP"
and only a limited business was done ocov
othernereib
rates. Good barley without change
to sell. Oats, beans. and other ajiciestll:ls' +I,
MARKET HARBOROUGII"Tf51;41:101
White wheat,:42s to 445; red, 369 t°:„.tileg,
Malting barley at 33s to 36s per qr•; gr--203 ta
per 30 at, Oats, old, 26s to 295; new'
st.; beans, 33s to 38s per qr.

itO
LIVERPOOL—TursD ,
e tow" iii#)l
There was a small attendance both 0' . wet tf
country millers at market to-day. Whe,a„`g of Issoalt,l
slow sale, at no improvement on the prw—rica.
Flour quiet, but nominally unchanged ihrtioo,lifq,
oatmeal met a dull sale, aud prices about Ito
tuttyleersdooinulgy
offeringinlud 30s.
Indian corn—holders

Foreign Mail Packet

_ O•ll'
MAILS DUE. ~"fdD,,
Australia. and Mauritius, via SouthaulPtcli..a,...feD.:;ti.
- via Marseilles .:'..,,0'11it 1,
brazil and Cape Verds, by British rael(eil"e.i.cet,fe'•%'
Cape of Good Hope, Ascension, and St...- ptd joll'
China, Penang, and Singapore, via .9e.;11113e5". ~
- via gar° . . 0 "141/„' i
Falkland Islands..
Gibraltar, via Southampton ''''''''' t°•'''/' ''''
India (Calcutta), and Ceylon, v.U.Soutills...'lis' ',
ti, oo' „ i'rel/ 3,
India (Bombay), via Southampton ...... ....'f°'
. ....,
- via Marseilles ..... •'''
r' .
Portugal... . .••. ,pill 3.
• ..................... tow., 0,
Malta, Egypt, and Aden, via Southau3P ~.11,0
via Marseilles .....„,
Newfoundland
Oporto and Vigo .................... ,_. .. lo'itef 0 ' ','
U. S. and British N. '.
America,. ti) isrit• P-acicet.*;,..loo; i'
- by V•SaluielAcic•AoeD,
by Cs•F ~.,'',3' :
W.C. of Africa, M-
adeira, and Tenerille":,,,•':,Ssil ;3,
Bahamas, via New York ....... .... i JO' '
Mexico ................... 'roll
................... ill,
All parts of West Indies, including '-'" ..... 4
California. ar,1211 British Colul fiY
01 l
1.1417 'l'l
-----t;to%t_ 00116ot
No Holm complete without $ - iflicies;.eoeot!oo I
SEWING-MACHINE. Simple, contlis.ct'.. reet' JO'
noiseless. Warranted to fulfil all t'ee 01 Or 41
perfect family machine. Prospeet°,ll.e Dil''
.4.0 , !I,'
No. 135, Regent-street, W.---LAD“., o 0 !ley -1.5 e en-
[ADVERTISEMENT.I-COHSUMptiOMeri titSiee;iptio:l;o,l
liver, and stomach complaints, is of 0,01 °tog llefeo i,
gravated and accelerated by drugs °all regt,,,°s s W,,,,1'i 6
perfectly curable by Du Barry's l'eltftds of '''-ccore,„•osi
Arabica Food, as proved by thou to tessr•-- catesl'tP4o
been considered hopeless. We quote -r tiis 1 lad ' oda,
Miss Lange, 18 years of age, cured attetrota thee%peelsef
abandoned all hopes of her recovelli cougll'itoliorriere4ji
pulmonary consumption, with leartu,stion rod, ~r 0, 4
exhaustion, spitting of blood, Persl3-00 0,0013' rl°l,
emaciated to a skeleton. She is novv, Lange, "- of :0,1;0J
healthy, blooming, fleshy girl,..._s. itobertgo,i 0
Police. Cure, No. 40,270. Mr. jole6spitttug 0,12,11°,'
Surrey, of thirty years' diseased Illogcore, S°: ill,tes,',lo
derangement, and partial deafness.--
otoess,vl.+l,,,,rettj
Elizabeth Jacobs, of extreme erns ialle'lentos.;o4oo.
gatherings, low spirits, and lle,-,-, faten/3" Wei;
54,816. The Rev. James T. CaraPbeii'v'er. wllica,,,lo p ',l
of indigestion and torpidity of the 209 d; 2,1 op o,lao,
all medical reatment. In tins, 1119'1pol it(tiosoll,%oi,6
11s; 121 b, 225; 241 b, 40s. Barry (10 od Dias P oilltd
Regent-street, London ; also °tFrtnunthe VIP 0310
grocers and chemists in every WWI • trOellt et °lit,
~, mi 010 has 0 ls" ti
[ADVERTISEMENT.I---41011010.7,:- ,itical .",terS,fo,o)
Healing not Harmful.--1.10 aPP'_F-,,• all e-ig'O'rliP"r, 1
same universal approbation tor curl?,,,,A. S
..14,0,110 p
as that which this unguent has recolvcourfse't ce iditiV
ulcers, fetid discharges, burns, blister:void
.pt. .1 Ito ~.)
similar affections are at once sootllet -tirit_l;3tecitV
of soundness by Holloway's ointroetesosenb owoo:b100
and his pills the wealthy may save t s to bet' be ClIP).
ing and the poor may help thernselve „,id 004 00,0
medicaments are reasonable ie Price;curefteuel died
in every hamlet. They have etrecte,,d °pa I reo
swelled legs, and ulcerated limbs, land 0' /
spect of alappy future, after eVerY
been given up. ---'
__--------- 00
--------_—___- • tta
~g of .1i
Births. „oiterler• I, ():
CoCKtRIML.-On the 25th inst., at_ 'of, dit wife po
of Captain Cockerell, 10th Ilussars!_,,, tbo
of 0 i
DATHAN.—Ort the 23d inst., at Soutpailt lit'
Li It S. 0'
Dathan, Esq., R.N., of ~ ' I
ter. 0101 tir
00111 0'
GURNEY.-On the 26th inst., at St°
Gurney, of a son. fi•• 'Ville'
STALER.—On the 25th inst., at ell
Doge
Trent, Lady Starner, of a sou.
l
DIP‘OI
marriages. t otiotoioo
~ -not., 1,00,' ,4
CASSIDY.-O'BRIEN.-- On the 11-4.`t 11 to 51' 0
of Nil 9,°,,t; is ftic. 1
Valentine Cassidy, Esq.,
Ellen, the youngest daughter of Le• t 0 I,
'feu° ',
O'Brien, Bart. ~ at l''' ktltlA'oo'
PAPPS --BART.- On the 21st W., . tO , tvev
Ellary Papps, Esq., of lionsin_Ft.,,e! of II."
1°0;
daughter of Commander Hart, lt-o I cet .;,
Deaths. .5(1'15 f'
toje i
4 Loo „V 1
BLISS.-On the 25th inst., at 2 , lc, I°l
ton, Mr. Edwin Bliss, aged 65.
._,,p10.
iivie
oftst°'
BIRCH.-0 a the 24th inst., at IIenle;
t De stle' 'l'
Birch, Esq., aged S 9. at S ',.,0 C 9 ~ V?
BILINCKMAN.-On the 231 inst.
'l2.dore t 71,1,3
Windsor,Lady Brinckinan, 0 /30.. ofire',./t,
Sir Theodore H. L. Brinclnull;o iforalcbiot,
..oc,o,
CATON.-On the 24th inst., at 131,_roub., o iPoce7o, ts,V
Richard Bewley Caton, 1‘1.4-•• uf,, p,,,t13 1). Abe:Jd _
colnshire, formerly Lieut.unindt•us'ir r3,ra1P,,,,,,,P' tie ,9,
in the campaign in Egypt
/lily Miki° Or" ,
clf
in 1801, and was subseque afor of,
Lincoln Militia, aged 90.
Woburn, ve i
Colo bb, 24th inst., a 0, ,
Cobb, Esq., aged 74- _... IRO liSf;
• t TIOw"
HORNE.---OH the 26th. Ins ~ ,
_._.____,----rip I, 11
land-street, Bankside• age"'"
_.,,,,, p.,f
041'1'4 se CO'
L------------ondon : Prinze—d and rub; 'ele.l _tY ITO elii.., tile
of No. 112, Strand, Printeo: at 5oref:110,
Strand, in the Precinct J_.,,,..ary ,o,
giddleseY.--ViCCIINACIAY, 4""