The Sun.
London, England, 1852-06-03 00:00:00

BIRTHS IN THE WEEK.

Dividend Amount
Name of trimly. per of Paid. Prico,
Annum. Share.
4 e. d. I. d.
Australasia .......... 51. per cent. 40 0 0 40 0
BritshNorth American W. per cent. 50 0 0 50 0 0
Oommercial of London 61. per cent. 100 0 0 20 0 0
Colonial..
Gloucestershire • •
lonian 6/. pr cent. 25 0 0 25 0 0
Landon and County .. 61. per cent. 50 0 0 20 0 0
Lowin and Westminstr 61. per oont. 100 0 0 20 0 0
London Joint-Stock .. • 61. per cent. AO 0 0 10 0 0 18N
Provincialof Ireland.. 81. per cent. 100 0 0 25 0 0 45%
Ditto, New. •• • • • • 8/. per cent. 10 0 0 10 0 0
National of Ireland .. 41. per cent. 50 0 0 22 10 0 20
Nat. Provncial of Eng. 61. per cent. IDO 0 0 35 0 0
Ditto, New. • •• • • Q. par cent. 20 0 0 10 0 0
Oriental Bank Corpora. 81. p. ct.& bs. 25 0 0 25 0 0 4631,
donth Australia ••• • .. 6/. p. ct.& bs. 25 0 0 25 0 0
Union of Australia .• 61. per cent. 25 0 0 25 0 0 42%
Ditto • • 61. per cent. 210 0
Union of London. •• .• 71. par cent. 50 0 0 10 0 0
Union of. Madrid .•... 40 0 0 40 0 0 _

INSITUANON COMIEPANZZa.
Dividend Amount
Name of COmpaay. per of- Paid. Price
Annum. Share.
-- -.............--.
A a. d. £ a. d.
albion .. ............ 81.108. 5,00 0 0 50 0 0 86
Alliance Brit. and For. 71.145.6d.b5. 100 0 0 11 0 0 22
Ditto Marine. ••• • • • 61. p.c.& be. 100 0 0 25 0 0 41A
Atlas ..... •........ •• 135.6 d. DO 0 0 510 0 18N,
Arhus Life ....... .. 41. per cent. 100 0 0 16 0 0 -
British Commercial .• 7e. 6d. 50 0 0 5 0 0 6.1 i
Claricl,Med.&Ges•Life spr ct.& bs. 100 0 0 10 0 0 10ii
41. 100 0 0 10 0 0 101
148. 80 0 0 5 0 0 1614
Eagle ....... ..... •• • • 55. 50 0 0 - 5 0 0 7u
Egity and Law .... •• 434 per ceat. 100 0 0 50 0 5!.i
~loropeas Life ••• • • 10s. 20 0 0 All paid. 12
General •••••• • • • • • • - 5 0 0
if 5%
Gl-be
Guardian •-.•• • • • • • 51. per cent 100 0 0 45 0 0 56
Imperial Fire -•••• •• 121. per cent. 500 0 0 50 0 0 256
Irnperial Life •••• • • • • 125. 100 0 0 10 0 0 19%
In _len-nifty Marine •• •• 11. sh. & as. 100 0 0 20 0 0 50
Law Fire ... .... .... 25.& 2s. bs. 100 0 0 210 0 4
Law Life.... --- .. - 100 0 0 10 0 0 46%
be,s-al and General Life - 50 0 0 20 0 5%
London Fire ........ 105. & be. 25 0 0 12 10 0 25
London Ship . •• •• 105. & b 3. 25 0 0 12 10 0 -
t!farine.. ............ Iss.per share 100 0 0 15 0 0 15U
lied.lnvild &Gen. Life 4341. per ct. 50 0 0 20 0 2%
Monarch ••.•-.. - •• - 5 0 0 1 0 0 19s. Cd
'Tattonal Lean Fund- 51. per cent. 20 0 0 210 0 234
Plliadium Life 5l. per cent. 50 0 0 90 0 234
P ...aix • - - 160
Profeiselonal Life.. •• - 51. per cent. 6 5 0 010 0 155.0 d
Provident Life .... -• • 11. 55. & ba. 100 0 0 10 0 0 36
Rock Li fe........ .... 50. a 0 0 010 0 7%
Royal Exchange 6l. p.ct. & be. Stack. all 2253
4t171 Fire.. - „ 213
Ditto Vfe ••• -
United Kingdom
f TRiversal Life-. ..
Victoria Life - 412 6 5%
38047Z.110.
Dividend Amount
Name of Company.
per of Paid. Price.
Annum. Share.
............................... ...i...... ~........,, .1•••1.1..1••14 ••••••MMM.,
8. X
Commercial
- 90%
East and West Ind, a ,, 6341. pr cent. Stock. - -
East Country -.. •• - -
London ... •• • 5l. pr cent. Stock. - 12834
Ditto Bonds 4l. par cent. - - -
St. Katharine -
Ditto Bonds 43(1. pr cent. - - -
Santhanapton .....• i 11. per cent. i5O 0 0 50 0 0 27
117 it Xl3 OBS
Dividend Amount
Name of Company. per of Paid. Price.
Annum. Share.
...... ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••••••••ry......... ......,,
X. a. d. .C. a. d.
Efangerford...• • • .. • • - - - -
Southwrk •..... •• .. - 100 0 0 -- -
Ditto Nw of 42 p.c. 700. per cent. 50 0 0 - DE
Waterloo ............ - 100 0 0 -3%
Mtn Old Ann. ofBl. 21.85. Od. •-• 60 0 0 24%
Ditto liw ditto 0f.71. 21. 25. Od. -, 40 0 0 22
7auxhall •• .. •• • Av. 21. 70 10 3 - -
vrammst-worms.
Dividend Amount
Name of Company. per of Paid. Price.
Annum. Share.
..........1•VINNIMI ••••••••• ....................
X 8. d. A a. d.
East London..•• •• •• -81. per cnt. 100 0 0 - 155
Grand Junction ...... 4/.'per wit. 50 0 0 - 6534
Zeta...-. .. ........ 41. per cut. 100 0 0 - 83
Lambeth - 97
.... Now River Company 21.103.
- 60
Southwark & Vauxhall 51. per cnt. 100 0 0 -
W..at Middlesex ••• • - 161. Os. pr ant. - - -

Males
Females ... ... •••

Total
..,1,416
*ln this number are included 41 by Scarlatina, 3
by Typhus Fever, 13 by Diarrhoea, and 2 by Cholera.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
COURT OF EXCHEQUER, June 2.
(Sittings in Middlesex, at Nisi Prins, in Trinity Term,
before Mr. Baron PARKE and Common Juries.)
PARKES V. MAYER.
Mr. Sergeant Wilkins and Mr. H. A. Simon con-
ducted the case for the plaintiff, and Mr. Edwin James,
with Mr. Bevil), represented the defendant.
This was an action to recover compensation in
damages for an alleged fake imprisonment and assault.
It appeared that the plaintiff was formerly a partner in
• row, but had some time sines failed for a sum of 45,0001.
rti the firm of Parkes, Smith, and Co., solicitors, Bedford-
! On the Ist of July, 18M, being pressed for money, ha
made an application to a person of the name of Barnard,
,34 a clerk in the Royal British Bank, to whom he was
known, to discount for him. This application, how-
ever, was refused,
beiug contrary to the rules of the
• bank. Barnard wishing to assist the plaintiff gave
hint a card of introduction to the defendant, a plate-
glass manufacturer in Great Queen-street, Lin-
coin's Inn-fields, at the moment supposing that the former
had a good account at the bank, although it afterwards
tea turned out that that account was overdrawn by about
121. The defendant was in the habit of discounting
bills. The plaintiff, when at the defendant's, produced
three acceptances by
different persons, one for 1201., one
for 401, and one for 301. At first the defendant refused
it to comply with the reqaest to discount, but subsequently,
upon the plaintiff depositing with him fifty share, in a
lime quarry in
Cornwa:l, the deltridant made an advance
of 501, vehicle such was either to be repaid in three days,
;m or the discount was to be completed with a deduction of
101. The plaintiff, however, having obtained the 501.,
did not again visit the defendant, as bad been agreed
% upon. Upon this a corresponds:nee was opened between
the parties, the defendant demanding the repayment of
6 the 501., as he had discovered that the bills were unsafe.
9% And so it proved, for on their arrived at maturity they
,0 were dishonoured. The money for the 401. bill was af-
-4
was walking along,
terwarda recovered. It happened that as the defendant
Cheanside on the 4th of October
he met tho plaintiff, whereupon he gave him into
• custody upon a charge of having obtained money from
him under false pretences. This was on the Saturday;
Cd and on the Monday, having been brought up before !tte
234 magistrate, the ease was dismissed, upon the ground that
2:4 the false pretences had not been established. The pre•
I.od sent action was therefore bro tion for this imprisonment, dght to recover compensa-
is
•1,0001. and the damages were laid at
The plaintiff, having been called, proved the original
transaction, and added that ho banked at the Royal
British Bank, and that he had applied to Mr. Barnard,
the chief cashier, who eventually gave him a card of intro-
duction to the defendant.
Cross-examined by Mr. JAMES—At the time of his
application his account was overdrawn 121., which ba-
lance against him had not, up to the present moment,
been diminished. He had not told the defendant that
the clerk at the bank would endorse the bills. Of that
fact he was quite certain, and would swear it. He had
t 34 deposited some shares with the defendant as a sort of
security. Those shares he bad purchased of a
:34 Mr. Pace, but he had not paid for them. He
gave a bill for them, which had not been paid. The
bills he had deposited with the defendant were
bills which had been accepted for his own accommoda-
tion, and they had not been honoured. He took the
benefit of the Insolvent Act in 1849, when his liabilities
were as much as 45,0001. In the course of his ere-
Paid. I Price. fessional transactions large sums had come into his pos-
session, but had not afterwards been forthcoming when
required by the parties. Hence the large amount of his
liabilities.
Further evidence was given to prove the custody and
It 6 the Lord Mayor.
jury for the defendant in
eidhereppluaitnattiiffoa, and by practising frauds
tvheerMydrai:jltiaiPsEleseocathdtd:lreeetlslaemsdeeebttyhieng in terms of great severity
tea
a respectable practice as an attorney, had subsequently
who, having once been in
on the unwary. He would leave the matter in the hands
existedo t he conduct
hd
iuscrtuoi
ruined
of the jury, by whom he felt assured due justice would
be done.
after a little consultation, returned a verdict
Mr. Baron PARKE then summed up the evidence.
e t 4
laintiff—Damages. One Farthing.
I 97
A 3 forTthhee pjury,

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, June 2.
(Sittings in Banco.---Trinity Term.)
GREGORY v. THE DUZE OF BRUNSWICK.
In this case a rule has been obtained, calling on the
plaintiff to show cause why the record should not ba
amended, by inserting in it the judgment of the Court
f
pay the costs incurred subsequent to the judgment.
it appeared, had been carried to the Court
of Exchequer
gave judgment far the plaintiff on the de-
murrer,W o
T Ehxeccheafiqe n
,er
Chamber, Chamber, andan d
thaty the plaintiff should not
h Court, in the absence
of h
the demurrer, and for the do-
ii fendant on the issues. One of the defendant's counsel
present, by mistake, endorsed on his brief " Judgment
for the defendant, with all the costs," and on the brief
being handed in to the Master, this endorsement was
e with the costs of
entered on the record, whereupon the plaintiff's atter-
afnactookither inquiry, immediately
'issued a
the case to the Rouse of Lords,
judgment. given below was affirmed.
The Master having been requested to inquire and re-
port when the respective
attorneys first knew of the
whereawerYi o fwt
error,
mistake, now reported that neither of the attorneys knew
of theovrit of error until a few days before it was argued,
but that the defendant's attorney first knew of it.
On this report, Mr. MAN/STY, for the plaintiff, in
showily, cause against the rule, contended that the de-
fendant ought to Day the unnecessary costs which bad
ice. been incurred, 'the mistake also having originated with
him.
Mr. ATHERTON, Q. 0., havin—
g been heard in support
A of the rule,
16 The COURT made the rule absolute, and ordered the
defendant to pay all the Costa, including the ooata of the
application.-1300 absolute.
t 7