The Sun.
London, England, 1852-04-19 00:00:00

'Total
... 307
...
The yearly comparison of the weekly imports is
under; _

rigs. ..,.(3.1
Beasts. Sheep. Lambs. Calves. 29 '-%•,
1851 443 ... 1,018
... _
... 393 ... -,e' 1
1850 464 ... 545 ...
... 235 ••• a • :s;
~ .f.t
1849...
...., '
1848— ..... 532 ... 588 ... ••• 136 .. During last week the arrivals of stock from 1re1and,......0
direct by sea, amounted to 40 Beasts. From ouro 17y. ,;li,
grazing districts the receipt* of Beasts, fresh up t
Dild
were unuutially heavy, the time of year considered,sat_tecn; in excellent conditinr. Notwithstanding that the
danct; of buyers was large, and that the weather. ws
vseiry ,ta,
vourable for slaughtering, the Beef trade
on Monday last of are fur,
depressed state, at a dectin., in the quotatiwonass6lonbtained '
1,
total
the best Scots was only 33 4i per Blbs.,f ,
ign stock
2d per Bits. The extreme
clearanc,,. was not effecTed. The sh"wisiootrfojlrke,-suffolk.
was but moderate.. The arrivals from Norfolk,
to
2,
460 So"'
Essex, and Cambridg
homebred*, and short-ellsohritnes.
ford; runts, Devons, i&c*;
amountedrem other parts of }-7,og-
land we received 800 Iffre
and, polled Scots, mostly
and from Scotland,
till bareods met a very dull inquiry!
~:
horneda
considerable increase in the Y,.
per railway. There was s
I • of he best old Dowos la 4,
:unptipilny csofalSeheiTtanees the currencies had a downward .
' 1 The ex;seale va 1,, s
the wool
was
48 From the . Isle of Wight, °"
.6jCi(lle-'. 2d per Bibs. Nearly four-filtbs of the .
.•
Sheep were shorn.

,
001
6 d
be

Per 81b&, to sink the oasis.
April 21, 1851. Apr. 19,1852.
& d. s. d. s. d. s. d.
Coarse and inferior Beasts ... ... 2 4to 2 6 2 2to 2 4
Second quality ditto ... ... 2 8 210 2 6 210
Prime large Oxen .. ... 3 0 84 3 0 3 2
Prime Scots, sc. ... 3 6 3 8 3 2 3 4
Coarse and inferior Sheep... ... 3 2 3 4 2 6 2 8
Second quality ditto ... 3 6 3- lei 210 3 4
Prime coarse-woolled ditto ... 4 0 4 2 3 6 3 8
Prime Southdown ditto ... ... 4 2 4 43 10 4 2
Lambs... 4 8 6 0 4 6 5 6
Large coarse Calves ... 3 0 3 6 3 0 3 8
Prime small ditto ... ... 3 8 3103 10 4 2
Large Hogs .... 3 3 0 3 4 2 6 3 4
Small Porkers ... .. 6 310 3 6 g 8
Beasts ... •-• 3,254 4,886
Sheep and Lambs .. —.22,530 26,420
Calves ... ••• ••• ••• 194
Beasts u 5328820.1
Pigs ••• ••• • • • 400
SUPPLIES ON SALE, APRIL 22, 1850.
Sheep and Lambs, 20.760; Calves, 126;
Pigs, 230.
APRIL 23, 1849 Beasts, 4,349 ; Sheep and -
Calves, 132 ; Pigs, 240. Lambs, 20,320 ;

Boasts.
4,886

TOTAL gICTPLY AT Iti 4/tV'7ll.
i EilleeP. I Calves. I Flee, 26,420 1 221 I t. 280
oREIGN surpta.
Beasts 1
530 . Sheep.
250 1 Calve
158 s. I Pigs.
iiVUTGILT3I3 AND ZEZIZEITEALL.
For the time of year, large supplies of country-killed
..Xeat have come fresh to hand, in excellent condition.
'The show of Illeat slaughtered in the metropolis being
'very moderate, the demand for Beet, Mutton, and Veal
:is steady, at full prices; but Lamb and Pork are lower
to purchase.

tho depositor having in the mean,
i 3i.nie,naurried, the present action;was:brought in her bus-
rid s name, and tried before Mr. Justice Wightman,
at the last Stafford assizes, when a verdict was returned
for the defendant, with leave to the plaintiff to move the
Court above to reverse the thcisicn. Mr. Keating ac-
cordingly now moved and argued that the notes were
accepted by the Bank as money, without any guarantee
or condition, and therefore they were liable 4t law to
make good the deposit.
„ .
Mr. Justice WIGHTMAN said the real fact was this,
the notes were paid in at 11 o'clock on the morning of
the 26,h of June, and the Stourbridge Rink paid that
day and not afterwards.
Lord CAMPBELL said the point involved in tho case
Was one of considerable importance to the commercial
world, and it ought therefore to be fully argued.
Rule nisi accordingly.

EXCHEQUER.-(THIS DAY.

MILLER V. ALDERMAN SALOMANS.—JUDGMENT.
The court was very much crowded by the bar and the
public this morning in consequence of to-day having
been fixed for giving judgment in this important case.
It will be recollected that the action of Miller V. Salo-
mans was brought to recover certain penalties which
were alleged to have been forfeited by the defendant
under the Ist of Geo. 1., c. 13 and the 6th Geo. 111., c.
53, by reason of having voted in the House of Commons
without having taken the oath of abjuration. It was
tried at the last sittings after Michaelmas term, when,
the jury returned a special verdict, and the case came on
for argument before the full court during last Hilary
term, when the Court reserved its judgment. There
being now a difference of opinion among their Lord
ships, Mr. Baron Martin, the junior baron, delivered his
judgment first.
Mr. Baron MARTIN said Sir Fitzroy Kelly, on behalf
of the defendant, urged three points. First, that it was
not obligatory to take the oath of abjuration at all=
that it was abolished, or-expired at the death of George
the Second, or, at all events, at the death of George the
Fourth, and ,hat there was no lawful authority for eubsti-
tuting the name Queen Victoria in the place of that of
the monarch who was on the throne when the oath was
enacted. He was of opinion that this point was not
tenable, and that there was ample authority for intro-
ductile the names of Sovereigns into the eath as they
succeed to the throne. The second point was that the
words " on the true faith of a Christian," were repealed
by the 10 Geo. III.; but this he also thought was not
tenable. The third was, that according to the true con-
struction of the statutes, an obligation was imposed on
all subjects, whether Christian or Jew, to take such an
oath as was binding on their conscience. He intimated
also (as we understood) that he considered that point
could not be maintained. The fourth and last point, and
really the only one in the present case, was whether, as
the defendant had taken the oath in a way
binding on his conscience, though, omitting
the words "on the true faith of a Christian," be
had not taken the oa,h •in a lawful manner, and
was consequently relieved from all penalties.
The Learned Baron then went through the various Acts
at considerable length, and observed that the main object
of them appeared to be to exclude all pereoes who were
suspected of being disaffected to the Crown, and to compel
subjects not to take the oath simply as a matter of form,
but in a way really binding upon their consciences. The
words " on the true faith of a Christian" were not in-
serted as a test of Christianity, but in order to make the
oath more effectually binding upon Roman Catholics,
who were then suspected of using mental reservations; for
it was evident that the Legislature never intended to term
Jews Popish recusants. The special verdict found that a
Jew was bound by the oath as taken by the defendant,
though he omitted the words in question, and it would
be a manifest absurdity to compel a Jew to use another
form, and to swear " on the true faith of a Christian,"
when that was not binding on his conscience. Highly penal
statutes ought always to receive a just and reasonable
construction, but if the view contended for against the de-
fendant were adopted, he could neither sue nor be sued; he
could neither bequeath property nor have property
given to him ; and on the warrant of four justices of the
peace he could be banished from the kingdom, and if he
returned without the license of the Crown he might
suffer the penalty of death. His opinion was that
a Jew ought to be allowed to take the oath, omit-
ting the words "on the true faith of a Christian;"
and that opinion he believed was consonant with
the principles and practice of the law. In saying, there-
fore, that the defendant was entitled to the judgment of
the Court, he thought he was doing his best to carry
out the intention of the Legislature, and to give the
true legal construction to the statutes on the subject.
Mr. Baron ALDERSON said the Court all agreed that
three of the points submitted by the counsel for the
defendant were not Supported, and it was only on the
other point that the Court entertained any doubt, viz.,
whether on taking the oath of abjuration Alderman Sa-
lemons was bound iceadd the words " on the true faith
of a Christian;" and whether, by purposely omitting
them, he must be deemed as not having taken the
oath at all as prescribed by the Act 6 of Geo. lIL ?
On this point he regretted to say he differed from his
Learned Brother, Mr. Baron Martin, being clearly of
opinion that the plaintiff was entitled to the judgment
of the Court. He considered that the words omitted
formed an integral part of the oath, and could not be.
dispensed with. It was argued that such a construc-
tion involved an absurdity, and that according to the
golden rule it ought to bit modified, in order to get rid
of the absurdity ; but he held that no more modifica-
tion was required than was necessary to dispense with
what appeared to be inconsistent or absurd, He saw
nothing in the Acts recited which induced him to be-
lieve that the Legislature did bet intend that the words
" on the true faith of a Christian" should form a ne-
cessary part of the oath. The object of the Legisla-
ture evidently was,. that the oath of abjuration was to,
apply to, and. be taken by, all persons named in the
Act, of whatever religion, whether Protestant, Roman
Catholic, Jew, or Moravian ; and that this was so
was proved by the fact that Acts had been at
different times passed dispensing with the words in cer-
tain cases, but unfortunately they did not extend to ,the
present one. The words were incorporated in and formed
a part of every sentence in the oath, so that without
them no part of the oath would have exactly the same
meaning as when they were added, he therefore was
of opinion thet Alderman Salomons had not legally
taken the oath. He regretted that as an expounder of
the law he was compelled to come to. that conclusion,
because he believed that at the time the oath was en•
acted the case of a Jew- was never contemplated. He
thought, however, it would be better,. if Jews were to
be excluded from Parliament, that they should be ex-
eluded by a specific enactment, and not by an oath
which was intended to apply to a different class of
subjects. He regretted that the consequences of his
decision were so serious, involving as they would disa-
bilities of a very grave character, for in addition to being
liable to the penalties sued for the defendant could be
made an outlaw. He hoped, however, that some legis-
lative remedy would be provided to meet these-
ties but it was his duty to expound the law as it was,
and not as he could wish it to be.

At per stone by the Carcase.
s. d. to s. d. 1 a. d. to s. d 'eef, Inierfor...... 2 0 ... 2 2 ( Mutton, inferior .. 2 4 2 6
-- middling .• .• 2 4 2 6
. .... p rim e 1 arg e.. 2 6 2 8 middling.. 2
prime -•• 3 0 210
3 6
1.. •-•-• prime small.. 210 3 2 Pork, 1arge........ 2 4 210
.881•• •• .• ......•• 8 0 4 0- small .... •• .• 8 0 3 6

Lamb, 4i 6cl to 5s 41.
BOROUGH &ND SPITALFZELZDS.
Exten,•ive suppiies of Potatoes have arrived, coastwise
and by land carnage, during the past week; and aese
3 markets continue heavily supplied with parcels of good
tuality. From Harlingen we received four baskets, and
t tom Ireland four sacks, For all kinds the demand is
k awry, as- follows :

Per Ton. Per Ton.
"Yorksiz Regents. 60s to 80s Kentish Red Kid. —s to —.4
:Ditto Shaws ... —8 to a Cambridge
.Lincoln. and Wis- Kent Regents-- 60s to 75s
beach_ .. —B to —s Essex Regents 6os td 75s
Scotch Regents.. 60s to 70s, Essex Shaws
Perth Cups
lifeshire ditto.... 55s to 60sIKent& Essx. Mid. —s to —s
Common Whites. —a to —BlFrench
Naive:ode &Ber- 'Dutch Whites —s to —s
wick Regents.. —s to —a Chats . —a to s
- ZOROUGU BOP 81Z8.2/1.31.E7t.
; Not the slightest change has taken place in our mar-
-set• Fine Hops, being scarce, command full prices, but
lovv and middling qualities are somewhat neglected.
• Sussez pockets, 112 s to 1265; Weald of Kent's, 126 s to
o--
8 ; Mid and East Kent, 130 s to 240 s ; Yearlings.
to 11 Os ; Old olds, 224 to 50s.

WOOL
The imports of Wool last week were 2,023 bales from
Hz ort Philip, 2,400 from Sydney, 451 from Mogadore,
2O from Bombay, 370 from the Cape, 34 from llam-
Qgb, 323 from Alexandria, and 678 from Adelaide.
bends
of both English and Colonial continue to change
46114 for shipment to the Continent, but for home use
*ell little business is doing.
TLOW'.
Since our last report the demand for all kinds of
3allow has ruled "very inactive. Prices, however, are
3PPorted. To-day P.Y.C. on the spot is quoted at
,L 4 9d per cwt. For forward delivevy so little is doing
hi..l4k the quotations are almost nominal. Town Tallow
Per cb
litiful, at 35s ;per owl. net cash; Rough Fat, 2s

1848.

latlek Ws day 8,282
(11
I.
C. tos°sogd
ixt,,,,el.:Ylaat Week .. 1,029
l;ZsoTafttne
wee„ „ 92,79
2121
921:898
• aet of Tovfa
52s Od
hOUS-

1849. , 1850.

1851.

1882

26,243 29,182
38s 9d 3na Od
to OsOd to OsOd
1,322 I 1,570
96,137 116,446
289 $9
108,847 90,157
41s Od I 38s Od

34,242
408 Od to
1 408 64

42,914
35s 9d
to Os Od

777
66,239
6S
94,963
41s Od

1,05 i
96,603
I,9ii
102,983
38s Od

E OF.' LoRDS.-4THIS DAY.)
Their Lordships sat this morning at 11 o'clock to hear
Ll:ird pals.
The Peers present were the Lord Chancellor,
Ashburton, and Lord Lytteltoita.
ittFiaTallraxa V. EAST FIFE RATLWAY COMPANY.
Of 13:?4,11 appeal from an interlocutory of the Court
pstim,o ef Scotland refusing an injunction to the ap-
%tab:: Prohibiting the railway c ompany to pay over
oentroripa of moneemy due on behalf of the expenses
_4,4 by th.
left '"ulir was opening the appeal when our report
C"l4

-ANCERY.--(THIS DAY.)
(Before the LORDS J usTicEs.)
4.4ordship3BALLINGER v. HAVES.
proceeded with the arguments in this
"afd appeal this morning.
ItQLLS' COURT 'THIS DAN*)
In FORD v. SYTIA.P.T.
bOrrr, 18 sßit the defendant, Sir S.,meon Stuart, in 1832,
de"Ted the sum of 8,000/. from sir C. Saxton, and
ear
be keiu eZecuted on the 234 of January in the sameye.
tide a ,
ot that settlement of certain pri )perty in consideration
itirthellt Olin; the defendant su.bsequentl borrowed
--.411, r‘r a urns from other parties, and mortgaged the
tiot, enperty for the repayment 'at' them, and the clues-
Ras ~;aiil. Whether the deed of the 2.3 d of January, 1852,
cided °Noun, in giving judgmeint thin morning, de-
;4'4a' it was valid, and dismiiised the bill.
. LONDON AND NORTH-WESTERN RAILWAY
In th• COMPANY.
INiat:3 Case, the plaintiff, who is the public officer of
41%4 iinhal and Provincial Bank of England, sought to-
PBOV Ce L. adon and North-Western Railway Com
.r,lablo for certain 61103 s whioh they had paid over
454 t-414 parties on account of Mr. Thomas Burton, a
_ rotor
gated , who, it was contended, had.previously exe-
t° hiii;tl!4"ighinent of all sums which might becume due
12th Dean favour of the Bank. It appeared that on rho
cettanniber, 1846, Mr. Burton oontracied to construct
and 8t Portions Portions of the line from Rugby to Peterborough,
'iilLattiford, and in the month of March,lB47, applied to
aidera'ljtii°ll4l and Provincial Bank to advance him a con-
ebaldt. r,%e B,,,uEn of money to carry on his works.
.Theed
Lt4mh,.4"t' him a considerable ed vance and received
Petty int 4 at the same time an order on the railway com-
,.dne ta)PaY Over to them all sums which might become
zurtoa t-41.- Burton on account of his contract. Mr.
wOrara a -putt4; e, time after fell into difficulties and his affairs
4IL° the hands of assignees for the benefit. of
eatspaym Li,orB, a
nd the railway company made several
by the
them on account of the contract entered into
tee
Insolent, for which it was now sought to make
~:;nttipany liable
kisis..lloN.oun, in °giving judgment, said that the two
iontions in the ease were whether an assignment had
executed by Mr. Burton to the National Bank of
'4,lglarid, and whether the railway company had notice of
401:assignment. After going through the whole of the
,s'3B Ilia Honour said that there was not, in his opinion
dltadyanceed by
athe. plainiiffs to support'
t'tlic'ititit evidence
gerof these proposition , an
Itnisa the bill, but without costs. should, should, therefore,

..,
ICE-CHANCERY.—(T HIS DAy.)
(Before Vice• Chancellor PARRER.)
SHARP V. LAING.
'lli
injunction, prohibitina
VI, I visa an application for an
whiZle of a cargo of salt e now on its way to Calcutta-,
alai,. it Was alleged on behalf of the plaintiff had been
due authority.. 4, fed by the agent wit .
1)1, a Rozionn now gave yudgirento dismissing the ap_
tior,
Itt
.s THE MIDLAND UNION,
BURTON-lIPON-TRENT,
111mUt"DE...LA•ZOITC11, AND LEICESTER RAILWAY
`tautif:4Nt,a mo EX PARTE HILL.
- W4ll ion on behalf of Mrs. kill, the adminis-
ditee
t)t of John George Norbary, deceased, for an order
hti hvltig Master Tinney to reviewbis decision, whereby
flit 4, Placed the name of Mrs. Hill,. as the administra7
the ° Alt• J. G.Norbury. on
tibov
counsel, it
411),41. 0 company. From the
statement of
vi.
the list of contributors of
°etitti " that Mr. Norbury was a member
d consented to take
it co,st,,!ld managing committees, an
of the pro
tilloit`to number of shares, but that none were
$.(l t11:4 to him; that he had attended several meetings
one(in
ever
,eb 29 ,Laanaging eummittte, and in perticular
is_t4er;„tu of October, 1845, at which the report of
,the
‘.ll-I.l'-b"3''B engineer a been received, and ordelect to
()tai), n'lled in the daily papers. All the claims of the
ti 814113' ad been satisfied with the exception of.that.
di r• 11
. tect, azter, who, at the rt-quest of the provisional
IP' .48, had dischar d th .laini of the company's
,14„..
ge e C,
IL, 'lt".
the 4x,"°uß gave judgment, confirming the decision
aster, and oisrnisbing the application.
r4tt ID.
itti e .'"N'S • BEN CH.—( THIS DAY.)
al\itt• ij61.i.11 banco, bi-fore the LORD CHIEF JUSTICE,
"kW —`i" WIGHTMAN, Mr. Justice ELME, and Mr.
lee eitomeTox-)
tfb.,l'hia 1%,„_: . ARNoTT V. HOLDER.
l,' Nb„,;°': an action upon two bonds, one for 300. and
't, lb,— :let` 1501., to which the defendant had pleaded,
Is' tb - ''`Fttlite of limitations; and secondly,
.bankruptcy,
lilt e trial
1,
,term,
a _b:
rt)rie the Lord Chief Justice in London,
4414;4) they i
t ryas returned_ for the plaintiff, with
44, ti
._, defendant to na.be the full court for perrois-
n C accordingly
h h,'"-4 a Roßsilit. Mr. Knowles, -,.. ~
voi. —ov_ed
N ot . • and obtained a rule to show did pro-
r,, 40,!,Purely technical character, which dlu no;
Prt.
p.. `l4 Ittit mho interest to justify a detailed repor
t.
it 'ois
?ern v. SKINNER.
eNtri • was an avtion
11,4 "a"EI rioht c on the case ,
Otts z- ', 0, Way, which was tried at the
lest De-
`or, disturbing the
Qatr ' ", Etud a verdict returned -- 'h plaintiff.
ti . se,.
.„.
tut. , c
, illowigeallt taNGLAXE DOW moved for a rule
%use why a sew trial should not

Mr. Baron PARKE said the real question for the deci-
sion of the Court, was, whether the words " on the true
faith of a Christian" were part of the oath, or merely
the ceremony or mode of administering it. He could not
bring himself to beli,eve that these words were ever intended
to be omitted, or that the oath was meant to be taken in
any other way except on the true faith of a Chris-
tian. None but Christians, in his opinion, could
take the oath. The truth was, that the case of a Jew was
no more thought of when the statutes were passed than
that
of a Mahemedan or a Pagan. The words omitted
cbleeianr_lysof,or.med part of the matters sworn to, and that
the
t;gitth
of
was. obliged to come to the decision that
defendant.
Legislature was
abjuration was not properly taken by the
take tho oath verbatim
The °nit,
BARON believed that the object of the
, xclude all persons who could not
to omit or add trm, and the Court was not at liberty
what was just or unn'Yu'hing, according to its notions of
consciences
cf
je?vsst, so as to accommodate it to the
Tpyi:latur. to exclude even
it was notoriously the
avowed object o
of tobnee
expr,s4
aunlaar.denomination. When
to substitute
Christians unless
another to meet the re-
relaxation,
aicroperatively required
one statutes
forth, d iws tei
rnec tt Lye. ,y
lwigaisousos
etffaerraeaucdeps
oosiftitvhao
apseotpole4o language used
udo
though it might be termod just and lak,rnal.
grounds ho agreed with his brothers Mr. Bar,.?nahese
Parke
and Mr. Baron Aide, son, that :he judgment ought to be
given for the plaintiff.
Judgment fur the plaintiff
accordingly.

MIDDLESEX SESSIONS.
(THIS DAY.)
The April adjourned general session, forr athtisAeodunty
commenced this morning. before Mr. Sergeant
Assistant-Judge, Mr. Witham, and other emnagistraress,
at the Session House, Clerkenwed green.
The calend:,r, which is rad-v.r light, contains the names
of fifty-one prisoners for trial.
STEALING 1401.—James stalling,respeo.tably.dressed
young nari, was placed at the bar to r' ceive judgment_
upon an indictment charging ..him with larceny and
robbery.
The offi-!er of the House of Correction stated that he
had been in prison several times, and his cousin was
lately transported for seven years.
The ASSISTANT JUDGE, in passing sentence, said he
had better join his cousin across the seas. Since his
trial inquiries had been made into his character, which
had nut turned out satisfactory for him, and it must be
remembered that he was found guilty of larceny and of
stealing 1401., under most aggravating circumstances.
Taking all the facts into consideration the sentence of
the Court was ,that he be transported beyond the seas
Li- seven years.
James Goodwin,;.llenry Harper, and James Duff, who
were found guilty of rubbing an old mau of his Rune in

,

Lambs reached us . and the arrivals from other quer- be granted, on the ground that - the Learned
ters were large. +he truth) was heavy at a further Judge who tried the case misdirected the jury in_ixe_
decline in prices of 2i par Sibs, the current rates pimping the law of usor, under which -the- plainiiff
being from 4, 6.1 to 5s 6d per gibs. We had a very claimed the right of way. It was admitted that the waY?
slow sale for Calves, the supply of which was mode- had Leen enjoyed- for a period of upwards of twenty
rate, at last week's prices. Tee Pork trade was un- years, but it was contended that as the original gratita
usually heavy, a; previous quctetions• the right, which was under a lease, was made within a
Per Sibs. to sea the offal, term of legal memory, the law of user did not apply.
0. d. to s. d. s. d. to S. d
AND 'WIFE v. GIBBONS. •
The Court granted a rule.—Rule nisi accordingly.
Interior Beasts"... 2 2 2 4 Inferior Sheer .. .• 2 6 2 8
Second quality —— 2 6 210 Second qual. sheep 210 3 4
Prime largo Oxen.. 3 0 3 2 Curse-weolledditta 6 3 8 This was TairtmaMcirioBn debt brought by the plaintiffs
Prime Scots ...... 3 2 3 4 (:.tlthdown Wether 310 4 2 against the defendant, who fills the situation of public
i
Large coarse Calves 3 0 3 8 Ditto out of tlio wool 0 0 4) 0 officer to the Birmingham Banking Company, to recover
Primesinaliaitto .. 310 4 2 Large flogs ...• •• 2 6 3 4
651., under the following circumstances:—Early in 1851
!tackling Calves —lB 0 24 0 small Porkers .... 3 6 3 8
was then a spinster, received a
Lambs .......... 4 6 5 6 Quarter old Pigs ..16 0 19 0 Mrs. Timmins, who
A Statement and Comparison of the Supplies and Prices of
iegany of 1001, and 651. of that amount she deposited
,in
Fat Stock exhibited and sold in Smithfield Cattle Market, the hands of the Birmingham Banking Company,Li" on Monday, April 21, 1851, and this day, Monday, April an undertaking that she was to receive three per cent.
19, 1e52. interest, and to give fourteen days notice of withdrawal.
The 651. consisted of notes issued by the Stonrbridge
Banking Company, and the day following that upon
which Mrs. Timmins
Company
therefore refused to refund the 65/