The National Register.
London, England, 1820-06-25 00:00:00

.106

Inperiaf Parliament colothusedfrone page 203.
• slioeld disregard roasequesces, popularity, applause or tars
• tious clamour. The advice which he had always tendered
to her Majesty, and nine& he should continue to efier, nee
each as he deemed beet calculated to protect her honour, tits4V
• to coodece to the interests of the couutry, atwitter lie met
with opposition in or out of dean.—(Loud and continued
cheering.)
SLord CASTLEREAGH row, evidently mach agitated,
and was proceeding to speak of Mr. Broughams's speech, as
characterised by that ability which theHomse knew he could
so well continued, when Mr. Brougham left the House.—
Lord Castlereagh said, he could nut proceed unless the
Bon. &knitter was present.
The Hon. and Learned Gent. shortly after returned, on
which
Lord CASTLEREAGH rose, and in an excessively
long speech justified generally the conduct of Ministers,
and the conduct of those impended by his Majesty to treat
on his belied; and declared that iu proportion as they
'conceded, the Law Officers of her Majesty iocreased their
demands, that they had shifted their ground and bail been
guilty of tergiversation.
Lord A. HAMILION•then rose and said, that, in sub-
•tnitting an amendment to the House, he acted solely from
the impulse of his own feelings. His Lordship proceeded
•to take a most severe•review of the conduct ut Mr. Wil-
berforce on the present occasion, which we much regret
•we cannot find room for, and concluded a most eloquent
and able speech by moving, as an amendment,
" That this House, sensible of the objection the Queen
must feel at the relinquishment of any points in which her
dignity and hamar are involved, is of opinion, that the
insertion of her Majesty's name io the Liturgy would be,
under all the circumstances of the ease, the must tape-
client and most etkctual mode of sparing this House, &c."
Sir F. BURDETT seconded the amendment.
Mr. DENMAN spoke most eloquently of the heroic
conduct of the Queen, and declared that justice deenauds
ed as a first act, the restoration of her name to the

Liturgy.
Mr. !tanks, and Mr. Canning supported of coarse the
motion.
Sir FItANCIS BURDETT, in a brilliant speech, sup-
ported the anseedment.
Mr.WILBERFORCE replied, and the gallery was then
-cleared for a division, and strangers were cadmicd for
upwards of an hour. The embers were—
for the original motion $9l
Against it 124
Majority for the 'embolism —241
Daring oar at/mace, we andentaed, some discession
took place on the coarse to be pursued, in case the Queen
refused to accede to the advice contained is the resole-
Aims ; sad Mr. Brougham, we have heard, stated that
the Queen acted entirely for herself, and, nalike the
King, bad no responsible advisers, who were accountable
for theemireeshe pursued.
On uer re.adesission to the gallery, we found
The SPEAKER stating, that it had been meal, whea
addresses were presented to a gages, for the mover and
seconder to attend t and also, according to the precedents
on the journals, when her Majesty bad a household, for
some of the (Akers connected with it to go up with the
address.
Mr. DENMAN said, the precedents of other times did
not apply to the present case. Her Majesty had no house-
hold s hot he hoped the address would be presented in the
most reipectfal manlier.
It wasalsen agreed that Mr. Wilberforce, Mr. S. Wortley,
Sir T. /kiwi, and Mr. Bantus, should wait upon her
Majesty with the resolution. The House then adjourned
at lee o'clock.