The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1820-05-08 00:00:00

r,lo7ll,Luvziveit.

gnat or 111,41SAKOCar111100041%

•••mm..•

sea Et!. %lc sun 44.4.iiit0.
The Cosa were occupied in thologply.ent of the day Is
ltimicig motions of as pwbBe.it reslL re. JuNie• he.?
Sal its the Bail Court till sieves, et7ulnobs sboo, he littered
this Curt.
Mr. Hunt was ealleskspos to ge.mg milk hie argosies'.
Us iserisedialely rope ao4 walk that wheat he had left of au
tom precedirag day, he trod beemeorleavouring toksbc. their
knr.letrips, that the teMewiso reaped*" the Bags and ban-
ners unlit. um tip hare bees received. Thriv I.of4ldsitl
viuobl observe, that though all the witness,. who had seep
gremerisioss Week Asg spike of the mottos thereon. yet Is
no
iistaisee did they Rive similar testimony. This fag Was
produced at the trial, ow it was the cobbles, of justice its
osuMly painted, hot fortunately foe the !arrest's's. the
primer had omitted the sword; he said fortunately, because
so mach ores. had beau 101 l nu • bloody dagger which serer
existed. Now *allot sees who were seat by the Magistrates
to Mite soles of the eaottos very
Mr Justice BATLICT" 1 mulestronred to press
the Bags as against those cooly who bore them."
Ur. Hoot conteaded, that as there was the variance which
he bool stated in all the testimony, it was • strong reason
why the rule of the law of "widest" should not have been de-
parted frum, of not receiving ural fretioneay reeprelia2 writ-
he document*, where the documents thesseelves might be
yr•ilseed ; and these Bags were, he cookware', of the
',inure of willies doemsenta. He spa, pressed the Court
to receive the affidavits which he hail before offered; and
quoted n case where, upon application for • rule to thew
snaps, why • new trial should out be Emoted, allidavit•
were allowed to be read. _ _

Mr. hunter Bawt.av-w+" In diet immure the hedge who
tried the cause was sot wend; and the affidavits were ne.
cowry to assist thejodgmest of the Court, whether they
would grant • role to chew rinse or not."
Mr. Hunt then offered affidavit' as to the pint of being
taken by tuirmise at the trial, recanting the charge of fol-
lowing op the illegal intention (us appeared by the notice
of the first meeting advertised) of electing a legislatorial
attorney —After Wet discossioo,
The Court decided that a surpriec was where evidesee was
produced which is not expected; hut this *sootily evidence
mute tete of in • way sot 'tweeted, and which be (Mr.
Hone) bad Owned haselitiest for the purpose. It was
therefore no surprise.
Jr. Runt the. proceeded to slate that as the only fig
which it appeared be "veld know say thing about was
trio carried by the female who sat is the dickey of the
artiane in which Ile rode, he begged to recut to his
Lordship's (Mr. Justice Bayley's) recollection that be bad
charged the Joey if they believed the Dekedsols were
aorant of the mottos they could find a special verdict.
Mr. Justice FlituT—`l If the mottos leaded to excite dis-
It rec.' inn and contempt of lie Government, whether the par-
t** horse the tootles or not, it is illegal!'
'O.. Hunt—" That is titulary to what his Lordship
cud al the trial."

VI lusliet RATLIT etrited what he bed said at the trial,
•cr, tiling to his recolketina of it.
The Loup Crtn Joeeten—.-* The only difference up.
peers to be, that the Judge at the trial sued op she evi.
drum more favourably for you, them, is the opiniwnof *nos

. , . .
other Judges it aught to bays bees : it goes so further."
Mr. Dual proceeded to spite, that be was not by say
Means certain that if leadividsals were attacked is a email,
we alt llnerliemer, by • party ef soldiers : that they would not
be ;addled is resisting latch /meek, either with stones, brick•
bet., madmen. any other wetipon they might hisppea to have
in their hands, provided that they resisted individually with.
out mem, or eigreerneet with others. Mr. Hunt then shortly
summed op the arguments whirls be bad urged so their Lord-
ships' a ti,ii ties He would rest, be said, es the principle which
his Lorde.hip had implies teally impressed on the J•ry—to Rod
no Defendant guilty if 'Mei bad a doubt sport the matter;
but In let them have the besellt of mach doubt. With all
deference to his Lordship he must centred, that ho had
charged the Jury, contrary to this principle, what in the
'Venice of proof be hid suggested, that they might presume
•vdtist the isooctane of the Defrodants, whey, I. feet,
L the nrevaimptiee so ht to have been the other way. Mr.
Host eenclnded by apolugiaitig to their Lordships for the
time which he had •pied in stating his arguments, but
secured them be hiM coatined himself as strictly as possible
to those which he Thought cogent, and entreated their Lord-
ships dispassionate eassideratiou of them.
- When he had silt lows, the Lord Chief Justice inquired
if any of the oiler Defeedsests wished to addms the Court,
but they all dentined it.
The Loao ratair Justice mid, the Court would, agree-
ably to Mr. Hunt's request, take time to consider the ease
till Monday, wheal probably they would be ready to give
their deeisinte.
Mr. Haut hewed, and accompanied by the other De-

ftimiasts, immediately len t►e Civet.
After wb ie► a jury 111111 seem is, and t►e Lord Chief lea.
Levees at Nisi Prime, ►et .o ease of public istereet wee
tried.

TRU ZINO V. CASLILII.

Mts. Carlik appea►ed this nsoraing lo plead to another
criminal info' nsaisuu bled easiest her, at the instance of the
S. cies, fur the Suppression of rice, for publishing another
biespliwasous I brl, containing the flagitious doctrines of
Pelmet, Aye of Reason
Mr. Dealer, rend over the isformatien, to which She De•
fefwEint pleaded Not Cattily.
Mr. Deskry—m Take notice then, that yo■ will be tried
u•wa this information at the sittings he Crtsildhalt, so he held
OW the Coy of Leoslon, after the eras Term."
The Defendant Ikea retired.