The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1820-08-30 00:00:00

•

~~

r

.~

• ^r".••••;*.•

eoneome4 be woo ottaated by the purest imelims, hot it
aeceesled to him why his Noble sod Lammed Friend had
given his vole me be did roe the last question, hecames it
would lead their Lordships inter dilkulties. If the Noble
emel Loomed Lod was series. in tie tootles, of which he
Foe satire us Someday, it ought to have lakes prey:e-
demas- of every other questioe; until be had heard some better
rooter fk eihoorlefflid Moieties Mies he bill•hrird,be would
takiret to it. He would ask his Noble mid Leaned Prised
why belted allessed two sr three hears of debate to go ow
this *my, without his prolamin
.(lie.weetima which he heel
gives meliee of? It was an old adage, I' get am inch, mid we
will Wets lake • yard."
lad Erato, said, the reason be did not claim the proem
dame lot bile motiots, wee, that he onderstood from the
Vol* Eat' (Liverpool) that Counsel agates* the dill would
Welk exassinateas of witnesses they wasted.
' 'rho Earl of Liverpool (across the table)-0 I did wet
pledge that the Hone would do so."
toed Erskine certainly did not understand The Noble Earl
as having done so, but what was proposed by hies wee tweet
itiventageom to the accused; and was that a resume that he
.Mold sot vote for that which was useful ? The motion he
hail -before made fur a list of witnesses had been read; it
mil*, therefore, be necessary fee him to stile what be
• isitatirhy On rimmed resolution of that motion :it was, that
IbeCtirte4l fur the Crown might have the opportunity of
bnegin forward other wits/roses than Hiner in the list deli-
veries', the memeerel, with the approbation of the Hawse.
the/16006g the adviee of the Jodree. He wished from his
**art that that emotion had been carried, •• It would have
prevailed the Evolution in their Lordship,' proetediep which
bad taken place.
Karl Broknirst—lt was tree that the Noble and Leare-
ed Lord had voted for the last queetiort, which he said was
goosing • soinetbilig towards the administration of justice,
sad then hrtook advantage of it, by making a 'notion Mimi.
tar loth" owe had made before, sod negatived by their Lord-
Mips: The objections them op the greeting the list of wit.
“esses had not been removed, Modred of which it had become
more objectionable on account of the last vote or their Lord-
stilmi, which mad* it unnecessary. He did not 'hank the
:Noble and Learned Lord had any authority for his present
mottos ; if their Lordships were to come to a dilf-rent vote
from their former me, and the list of witnesses milted on
the arrival of the widener' is this country, they 'weld be
vilified in all the libelluwa vipers of the day. If a list of
oilneese• was granted, moil a necessary witness, if not won-
t.orted is that list, would not he allowed lobe prorhiceil by the
nuoset m, favour of she Bill, they would be prevented
trop the beuefit of the evidence of the witness. Ii had been
stated that when their amendort hail passed this Act, which
had been so meet. commented on, from that lime it hail out
been acted on testil the trial of oed George Gordon. Their
Lordship: mast remember the riots which took place pre.
.uus to that trial, which he might say at least took place
u...ter the name of Lord George Gordon. In a trill for high
liesson after that time, where a list of witnesses was given,
the lint and principal witness, resign his name having been
staled in the list, it was well knowit that he was assassi.
haled. On the late trials for high treason, it was well
known that It was with much difficulty that the crime was
primed; but after a list of witnesses had beeii given to the
prisoner', • witness bad been found that would have proved
the 'rearm al once; but Counsel Cm the prosecutium
was debarred from reducing him, localise his name was
104 in the list a witnesses furnished to the accused.
the only ground on which it ennid be contended that a list
et witurwies should be given in cases of high treason was,
th it 55w accessed weight inquire into the character of the wit-
messes ; bat it was only in that description of case it was
grassed. If gestated MI the present OCC*BIOII, it would be-
come a precedent, sod could not be refused is any other
ease; therefore it was nut necessary that a list of witnesses
shimiel be furnished. The motion of the Noble and Learn.

ts4LuittlwrUid;;;lmale the inquiry come to a more early
close, for if there was the necessity to inquire into the cha-
racter of every witness, the same inquiry would be necessary
as to the character of every witness that was Blot included in
the Ito, sod might be brought to give evidence iu support of
the 1611.
Lord Holland said, that it had been his anxious wish not
to have been obliged to have said one word on this sub-
ject. soil oolong "'old w,ve compelled him to have de.
parted from that determination, hut the extraneous matter
syntrh had beau introduced by the Noble Earls (Lauderdale
act aailturst). He thought they ought to have considered
bilker they argued against one of the best laws in the coon-
t. y, anti nut to have attempted to depreciate that glorious
Act of Parliament which bad been acted tot for the last 40
yeses_ It was to that Act of Parliament that he (Lord
fiollstid), and all his ilisjesty'e subjects, owed their
1, oet t y and the protection of their property. The
e,,:-.erving of that Act inviolate was of more come-
v.senee to the nation than the proceeding they were pain.
tcii, called on to discuss. What did the Noble Earl
(Fat:torsi) meat, by snyinz, because a moo accused of
filo treason, and was not eituviettd, did he mean to say on
seseunt of his acquittal the law was defective ? He had
cosy.; understood that in cases of usury, whether it was
r gi,t or wrong, it was not for him to say, that a list of wit.
trial-11 was gives. He would media repeat, that that glut,.
ci s Act which bad bees so mach cuniplatued of by the
NAle Earls, hail, for the last 40 yeses, secured to his Ma-
jedy's subjects their liberty and their property, and this he
s-id without the fear of contradiction. Much credit cer-
ts.uly .was due to the Noble Earl (Liverpool), Cum the man-
ner to which he bad introduced the subject to their Lord.
si spa that morniug, when be said, that he saw greater
t•suitirenience in withdrawing any promise which had
been made, or disappointing any expectation which hail been
reasonably formed, than in yielding an advantage. It had
been said by spume Noble Lords, what signified promises, and
rt st w3s held out, es we are obliged to act according to
justice. He would tell them they were not a law iribusal,
but that they were Lrgislatoes, acid as such they must act
f.sm their own breasts. When be was told that this was an
tididgence that the Judges in a Court of Law would not
grunt, he is reply would tell them tint it was an initial-
grace that their Lordaltips could grant, and by doing so they
would show the Royal accused that she should have every
thing from their bands consistent with justice. lie would
not say every thing be thought of his Noble amid Learned
File.c4 (Lord Erskitie), because be was present; but when
be cm hint in his old age with renovated vigour, instruct-
ing their Lordships, and skewing them the only way to put
us (Cul to this disgusting busioess, it only confirmed him to
the high opinion Le had of him as a statesman and a lawyer.
East Tar of Limerick was of opinion that the present no-
floe was onaecessary, as the Royal accused had gained as
-equivalent by the last vote of their Lordships.
Loyd Calthorpe said, he would support any motion that
weti.d rescue the Home from going further into the inquiry.
'Floe Lord Cimacellor observed, that be was bound by the
11:•!Ci111011 their Lordships es to the former question ; sold
ttiesr loorieg come to that decision, he wished it might not
10, followed up by the evils which be lied foreseen. lie was
staid it would lead to interminable didieulties, as it gave
the accused inure advantages than um ever before kuuwu in
the history of the country. He was of monitor they ought
it. go through will the ease against her Majesty, and then
show her as much delay fur her defence as she might think
pmper,G.Thielleing hi. 'pintos, be could sot say " Con-
kat" to the motion of his Noble and Learned Friend.
Laid &skim observed, that the intention of his motion
WWI i 9 4wearai delay.
Their Luedships then dirk!.
Conteuts
us-,Cou ten la

MajoriSy-apinst Lord Erskine's a mioe.. 108

Wiles Ise were re•admsstrd below the bar, we found the
Earl of D•rtthry em bis legs, impressing o■ their Lordships
the eintemity of • rigid adherence I• future to the rule of
cros•Maminalion ohm* had been resolved on.

Lind Volta m' observed, that without wishing to east
the slightiat imputalimi us soy of their Lordships, he
should be extremely sorry indeed tiler thought that soy of
their Lordships could vote so or so es this snomentous
question because soother Noble Lent did the owe.
The Marl of Darnley explained.
The Emil of Darlington recalled.° the recollection of the
Hoare Mato. Friday lest they had beim obliged to adjourn
their peameselieci at so smiler hour tbs. they would under
other Circumstances Isswe thought ♦wiper, is consequence at'
We Majesty's Counsel sot baying then patent • German

littotreter. It Iris se Is he dueled to NNW ot Mane
to thine Come, that they hod not begs as powided, 'bey
✓ot lassie( has aware before hind AM • alines if thee
laaguage was to be ~.mined. Mow he WNW Isom to see.
geniis order to obriotethe rororratios of • Isar isms.
usiukaue, mut so secokama. or rather facilitate. their lard.
ship' proceedings, that they should ogres IS haw Inetrue-
Woos given by the Mohair turd Lesasod lAIVEN Mt onallaelt
N the Coosisel oat both aides, that a list of the witnesses is
be examined rich day is mappers of the Bill should bo
wished the preteding ceasing to her Majesty's Comado is
order that they might be prepared giro their Irdeepralai in
whatever laoguage the willossors weight give their Matson
whether they should he Eppel's% Afahll4ll4o, Alhessassi
or Arabs.
The Earl of Liverpool thought that the LAOIS* IM omit it
rule would be attended with extreme ihcaressiesos to both
parties; besides. he did not see how it was at all prnetiati
Me to lay it down, for the production of gammon at psi•
titular time@ depended very albeit asta riecussiattcos car
lineally happening.
The suggestion was areartliogly dropped.
Cowart were them called to the bar, and informed by the
Lord tioarkellne, that the Howse coomented, under the spa-
cial circodostances of the ease, to allow the Comsat for the
Quet'h to proceed with their crentexaminations in the au-
laer ropused by them at the her of the Illoase.-..ausuiy, that
immediately after the nominate** of the witoteases in chief
should have bees finished by the Cianellel fur the Bill, her
Majesty's Crionsel should commelite their entos.exastion-
tiow, sod carry it ea to such extent as they might *eon St-
ang, with a liberty to call bock any witness or epitomes at
• rotate period, and crusa.examtisso than a setsed lime to
whatever extent they should desire.
The last witless, Barbara Kr-we, was thee immediately
called to the tsar, soil her croosexasinatiom combated by
the Queen's Attorney-Getters,.
Where do you live now? In a private house.
Where ? leash ray
How far is it from this! I cans in • coach; I doet brow
bow far it is

-.-. —.-
Which side of the river is it ! We nate over a belittle.
Who lives is the house with pm? Chili the people of the
house.

Wttere dors your brother livet With me.
In the same house? Yes
Has he given you any money? No.
Did he never give you any mosey! No.
Never. at any time! Nu.
Did he never promise you any at a (stare time He
sever promised me any Meg; how eon be promise me soy
thing'
Do you mean to my he had no mosey of his ow.? Osly
that which he took from home.

What trade is your brother! He makes pots.
Is be a workman, or does be conduct the looniness! He is
the master of the mannfactoty.
What is yunr father! My father was • setjeaat is the
•rmy, but he is dead.
Is your mother alive? No; bat I have a father.imlaw.
What is your step father! Ha was a sa•ster weaver, bet
be no longer carrier on business, beanie be is two old.
Did no person give you any money ►efore you cams
over here? No, except the ducats I spoke of.
Did nobody promise you mosey! Ni,.
Did nobody promise to give you any money whets you
went back from England to Carlsrshe ? Nobody.
Will you swear that nobody promised to give you any
advantage of any sort after going back from England! No-
body pl omis ed ine any thing, but they said I should have a
compensation when I returned.
H .w mooch compensation can't say what I shell get.
Who told you you should get a compensation! Oar
Minister.

Which Minister ? I said to hint, " I was to be compen-
sated for the loss of my situation."
(The other Interpreter translated the last answer-4I stall
lose my place, and I should get some compensation.")
What Minister! M. Von Berksted and be mid that if I
did not go I should be forced.
Who is 31. Von Berksted ? As far as I know, a fdlluliter.
Whose Minister! I don't know. _ _ _

IP he :Minister to the Grand Dube of Baden? Ido •ot
know whether he is Minister for Foriepi Affairs or the
Interior. _ _

Do you mean to say you do not know whether he Mose of
the Duke's own Altuisters, or a Weisser from • foreign
Court ? Yea, Ido not know , 1 bad any besieges with
that gentleman but just this.
Did M. Von glerksied MIA for you? Yee.
Did nut M. Von Kaden come to look at the room which
the Princess had occupied in the ion ahem you lived?
did nut see him.

you know that be was there for that purpose? I easel
tell ; I nerve saw him.
After the Prince*. left the inn, did any other gentleman
come to look at her room ? I saw nobody but M. Vim
Grimm ; he came in there and walked about.
How long bad be lodged in the into? 1 can't say this; I
paid no attention to it; I bed other lousiness.
lo what part of the home dud he live? In the rooms
Nos. 13 and 14. Before the Princess arrived he lived in
Nos. 12 and 13.

Did he not give up No. 12 for the accommodation of the
Princess? Yea, so far as I have seen.
Did he sot retort. to' that room otter the Princess was
Roue, to look shat was there ? Yes, be ran about and went
through the room.
Was there any hotly with him when he came to make this
inspection? There came two other gentlemen, one of them
his brother.

What was the other gentleman? I can't tell.
Was he an Englishman, or a German! I never heard him
speak English, but I psid no attention to this.
What is M. Von Grimm? As far as I beard, he is She
Ambassador from Wuriemberg
What is his brother? I caul tell that r Mier.

How often brd you' seen the Princess before the day you
say you went into the room and found her with Kerman!
I had peen her very little before; I had tun much occupation
to suffer that.

Did not you wait on her at breakfast in the morning?
No.

Did you never see the Princess as breakfast in the morn-
ing? Once I came la, when I was Intake a mantle to clean,
and saw her at breakfast.

Was it after that time that you saw her in the room with
Dereami in the evening ? Yes, after.
Does she mean that she was called in and saw the
Princess at breakfast after the evening in the room? Yes;
they had spilt something, which 1 was ordered to take away.
Was it after she had been called in to wipe up that slop,
that she saw the Princess and Bergaini together in the eves.
ing ? Yes, after.
Where did the Princess dine on that day, on the evening
of which she saw her with Bergamot? 1 can't say this;
don't know.

Did she dine Ist the inn! Nu; 1 bid slot sews It; she
had nut dined with us.

Did they ever dins at the ion the whole of She days limey
were at soar house! I hail 'hewer seen it with respect to dim-
mer; 1 ouly know it respecting breakfast.

Did she never dine the whole of the time they were there?
I can't swear to that, hi coos, I never saw it at the time.
Will your swear that Itergaon and the Princess did not
dine every day at Court, while they were iii your house? I
can't know whether they dined at home, ur where they

lid you see the Princess and Ftergansi and the rest of her
Royal Nightie's', sour gu lo Court while they were Own?
I hare seen them 'wire gine% away and returning, hut
wheihrr to Court I don't know.

Had you seen the Grand Duke come to the to wait on
her Royal Highness? I hsre semi the ("mad Disks and
several other Gentlemen come op to the Primers'.
[Another hitermeter who stood beside the witness, having
suggested some alteration ia the translation ,( the last
assailer, end occasionally Infuse was asked by Mr Brougham
whether he had ever examined the evilness befure ?—wiseiher
he had ever before interpreted hetweea her and another per-
son ?—or wheliter be had seeu her since stile bad been last at
the bar ? To all of which questions the reply was is lbe
negative, and the cross-examination proceeded.)
What do you steam by corning tips—was it to pay their
respects to the Princess? Yes, probably.
Did you kappeu to ace the Gantt Duke come to visit the

7.

Meals waft Am
git=r; *All
rim dare asinithall the INN
Where did her Rost Highness reeekeo the
Net they woe upstage. aw a
Doss she aeon to al that the Grand lONm
Is Nit the Prises at she maw whew she
out of her INGO ! 1611 SI MIMS 1110 .I.ll.lllgullBolltr
1 watt down. _ -•-
Dees she ones* thet the &sod Dote sod hie giallo,
lassedistely alter she IA the room where MN Mews
was! I ens% say Shaba it was Nesanse day, se Nam at
late.
Will she weer that the Greed Deke did es seas on that
dap Oe pay his respects? I a.sR Mr; I was slow is the
hoes, and hod ocespetions ' • I did net pay atteation.
Who gave ',es the order la terry water to that sew!
Nobody told as to do so; it Ina ay busiwas, which I knew,
and I did it every evades.
When you saw Si. bed the fret snorsisg, as yes INA se,
wee 11 ea the ties yea were states; the bed ? Ti., whew it
was to be made, feet bad sodas' otherwise to de wish the
bed.
Had yes wade any of the ether beds is the house that
searaise ? No; lbw was she Ara made when they left it,
esetpt the bed Noy waste wad his wife.
Wham else says, N what they left it," does she mesa what
the Princess sod Searsoi left it! Yes.
• The wilier den stated that it was the roost No. IS she
want.
Was any body is the rasa whew she wade the lord ! No-
body except a sass with a Ames coat, who ease WM the
MM.
When you were esakieg the WV Tee, whoa I was ask-
ing the bedoe miaow in tersiog the mattress.
Who was that sensed ? This way two of thew, but I
did not observe vast they woe closely.
Ned you ever men then before! Neva escape when the
Princess was there.
Have you sect sees then ante! No, not sisee she left
the Wiese.

Did you ever see diem at say tidier time whew yes were
amities the bed in that roofs! Ido sot kilow; they sewer
rens iris tbe roues except is the sinewisi, wires 1 woe wok-
keg the bed.
Did you wake the bed is No. It every Neornisfr! Yes.
Did yes see woe or Will of ahem perms' every seersisg!
Now sad dies I have pees use of them is the roost.

_
Did any of them waist you re inside, the bed me any
other day? Yes, awe and thee awe of them came Woe the
room and assisted me; sommiwies be remeneed, sometimes
be west out agues.
Have you may doubt that they were the Priem's% str-
eams? Piebebly, they came with her.
Did not they p away se well sa they came with her! As
far as I know, they weal.
Wee ore of them a Yager? I dotal know; oar of them
wore a poem coat; I bed sot gnestioned them.
le that COOTIMNIOOII with Mr. Ireksted about a wiespew
ration for aiming here, what did you say to him ? I said
to him, must I gu ? fur that if I am not obliged, I censor
leave home, es I am a married women, and have other Wei.
SKIN to attend to.
[At this period of the preceediags, • Peer (we usiderstond
the Part of Hardwieke) was taken suildeely ill, is mew
(tome., we presume, of the hest of the Heine, and was COO.
wryed into as adjoining room.]
What did he say is answer to that ? He said Ilast if I did
not go willingly, I should be (weed, and then I asswered—
thew I will go, mad God may settle the business (eraft the
moult) se he pleases.
(The witness having here manifested symptoms of weak.
arse, a glass of water and a chair were piovided her her, by
the direction of their Lordships, and the cresowasination
wee seepeaded for a few minutes.)
Has her family received the promise of any thing? Ise.
Wilt you swear that no preemies has been gives to your
husband or any of your family? lan swear that *Wring
has he.. promised-to tile, sad I Iliwik snaking to myfwaly,
or I should have known it.

Wm the 16 or IB ducats she received got for going to
Hanover? I can't say.
Mich do you recluse the ducat was which the gentleman
pee you is the morning—was it ■ present, or for your
trouble ? He gave it one for my trouble that I went shore.
How far was it that you went to the inn It rosy be
half of a quarter of an hour's walk, but she caul exactly say.
How tong did you remain with him--the detest gentleman!
The ant time I did not stay long.
How long did you stay the second time? Not long at
all, for I was just order the stairs when be gave me the
ducat, and I west away.

. ,
Were any of the gentlemen you sw called Mandeville, or
Man-Devil? I do not meow.

What do you usually get from a person who sleep' a night
■t an ion and goes away in the morning It was cosnaion-
ly given to the wailer, and went into a common purse.
What is your share fur balf a year? It was divided every
quarter.
How midi for the quarter then? Sometimes 18, 20, sad
30, according to the clamber of strangers coming to the inn.
18, 20, mud 30 what? Florins.
Do you know a place called the Glass-house? Yea, she
does.

Is there not a place which goes by that name near the
gate of earlsruhe, visited as a pleasure-garden ? Yes, many
pervious go there.
Have yon ever been there? I have been there with my
husband fu► pleasure.
Were you ever there before you had a husband Yes ;
with the permit' who became her husband.
Was you ever there with any body else, or alone ! With
bee ►usband, other servants, and maids.
Have you ever been there without your husbaad or alone !
Never with any body else.
Did she ever go ■lone before she was married ? Never,
except with hrr husband.
But beru►e you knew your husband? I went with my
brother and mister by days— by night.
About w bat time in Ike morning used you to make the
beds et the Mu at Carlsruhe ? I went when the Gentlemen
rose.

Do you swan that ye■ always went into the room wham
the Gentlemen ruse! Sometimes l weal in earlier *miaow,.
Uses later.

Alter you had seen the person whom you took for the
Primers' to Hergami's room, did you not go to see if the
Consilium of Oldi was in her room ? A. No; I took water,
sad went to No. 5, and they were standing there.
Did she nut go to No. 5, to see if the Countess of Oldi
was there? I went first there.

Did she hut go for the purpose of seeing if the Countess
ofOidi was there? I went and a. aril that it war the—

Some rtimht bring brie expressed as to the cur►eclne+e of
the interpretation of the avower, it was proposed to repeat
the que►tiur.
M.. Brougham submitted that if there was any doubt it
would lee Is ufficieri for the witnesss to repeat her answer.
The question below again pot, the answer civet, waste
ho;
.1 first carried the water there.

Mr. Reportbent appealed to Noble Lords even who did
not understand Berman, it its the answer first gives there
was not aline mention tattle Princess?

The loterpreier—" She callused ber reply by repealing
half a Petitroce se►eral times."

The Lord Chasmllor, addressing the interpreter, informed
him that is was out his duty to collect the meaning of the
witness, but merely to repeat her words.
Mr. firoughani—'. And if she repeat the words twice do
sou sio Itkewm."

Will you Raresr that you did Rot go to that room to see if
the emulates' Oldt wee there' I weal first there to carry the
water.

That is no answer to toy qesestion. Will you swear bat
you did out go in part for the purpose of seeing if else
Camases• elldt was abets! I email say this ; I did sot go fur
that purpose. I ha►a sever thought I should be asked
about it.

Will you, upon the oath you have takes, swear that re
never told any pennon that Too did so to the mina' IM
C0e191,08 te see of she were there or rot ? I eases recollect.
I hare no 'booed •rose it whether I have said ilea say
body.

11;111 you swear Astro. newer bad any coweentatitte with
awy penes' about pi wig into the Cawatesa Ohio's roam that
sight ? l can't owesr that leaver had say coawcraatiwo with
any body.
Mr. Llreeghem mid the treaties pot by the ImerpreMer

. ,

▪ •
you moat lot Ism-mesh shies pis same I.
ersentsp bed ainismersatina with say body about gums So the
CassokeseOldes Amass! Nis • with stobotly.
lattorproter—lbe sort"...eines Ik/roman has any body
embed Me
Mr. attleflttas--a Ayltralfliso Amt r Ye., two Gentle-
men Isere asked Parr.
Nee she bed boy cotiolimitiois wish any body besides those
Ins Gentleman Mount 40 happened withal ought ! Yes,
at Hoooree and Frnablast. las massif tabeeinse.
At Hammer who upoke is her abets it ? As Ambassador;
she does sot know h s same.
And at Frankfort who ! It was • Gentleman ; I don%
keen his nerve.
How bag bare you been at Frankfort at one lime ! Fire
or eis slays.
Hate pm bees at Frankfort et any other time ! No, we.
ver„ ',seep( when we west to Hanover we passed through
Freakier..
Who have yes spokes to so Obese relereb in this coun-
try ! Two gessiesses have come to use me, but who they
are I dos% boon.
Have you ever 'pokes to say one besides doom two restle-
ss,. ! No.
Do you know a Captain or Major Junes in this country.?
No, 1 brow nobody.
Du yes boon of either of the two geollemen you talked
Mesa speak Gamma ! Yes, iaassms..h as I did hear use of
them speak German.
Do you koow his name ? No.
Was he • German ore as Englishness ! I don't know ;be
spoke Gemara.
Besides Om house you are now !ivies at, have yea ever
been is say Miser home in London ? No ; 1 have been so
where the Enteert here.
When wee the Arm time she was in this house? Friday,
lea week.

Rd yen never been here before? No.
Wks von soy you have never been in say other house to
this cousin, du you mean that you leave never edt. d ■t
any Niter, rte neve► been in say other at all ? When bike ar-
rive✓ she went teas betel for a few boors.

Willy.. swear that except is those two houses you have
sot bees Jollity other fur ever so short a space of time ? Nu,
so vrbere else.

How many servants were the►e at the inn at Carleruhe
where you lived? Two waiters, a pvithey, a groom, and a
howeessid.

Was theme., other chambermaid besides yourself' No,
I was 'homely we.
How many maids came with the Princess! 1 have sees
may two sad the Countess Oldi.
By lard IllaissieW—When the courier came forward to
order isoadet bads, did he give any reason fur the elle.
ratios

flr. Browhaul !submitted that Ilse reasons of the courier
would at be evidence, and the question was withdrawn.
By Lord Illamifield—When the witness made the beds in
the morning, sad observed the stains, had the bed the appear.
awe of hawing been slept in by two persons Nu; the
cushions lay seem, the other, so far I recollect.
By teed Falmouth—Whet the witness in a firmer part
of her canalisation said, " I went to make the b d ghee
they bird left ;" what does obi mean by "they ?" When
she west there was no one in the room; she could see
nobody.
Had you any conversation wish any person respecting whet
you had observed of her Royal Highness and Bergman I
wryer mode observations to soy body.
The Ptincess, she says, jumped up, sad witness was
frightened; after that recut did she communicate it to any
*se! I spoke to nobody about it, (mein to M. Von Grimm,
who imbed ms about it.

Mew hug after the Prisons had left the iota were these
question asked pie' V 8000 at they VIM sway M. Yea
Grimm asked mae.

Asked you what ? He asked me into his room, but then
I was unwilling to say; he asked the again ■ml them I
said it.
I waist to know what the witness was asked? He asked
me, " base you seen any thing?"
A Noble Lord, who spoke from the gallery, said, that it
appeared to him the House lost pint of the evidence from
Ike Interpreter's imperfect knowledge of English.
Mr. Brategbani begged to soy, that lie Interpreter who had
yet stood at that bar, hod a better konseledgeof the English
language than the gentleman now at the bar.
The Lord Chancellor asked if there were not two of
them ?

Mr. Broughams said there was, and though in the course
of this examination his Interpreter had been on duty, the
other bad stood behind bins and had nut dissented from his
interpretation.
The Earl of Lauderdale said, he had not hitherto put a
single gantlets in elicit ary fact which he bad learnt from
his situation as • member of tbeir Lordships' Secret Cont.
miller. The Noble Lord made some observation on the
highly irritated state of public feeling, the purport of which
escaped us.
By the Earl of Lauderdale—When the Princras was at
breakfast, wise was with her ? They were all there.
Can she state what gentlemen, and what ladies> The
Countess, and the tither gentlemen who were with her.
When abeearried water to the chamber No. 12, and saw
the Princess there, did she the next night carry water in a
similar manner? No; it was then abut, and 1 placed it be-
fore the dyer of the room.

Did she, after finding the Princess in that room, generally
find the door shut or open when she curled water? Shut;
many times shut, nod many times open.
Does she mean by shut, merely closed or locked? I in.
tended several times to gu in, hut it wee locked.
Mr. Brorgbam begged to put a question again through the
Lord Chancellor, as there were some doubts as to the answer
which the witness had given. _ _

By the Lord Chancellor—Did the witness 9ey she found
the door locked twice, or several times! 1 did not think so
exactly twice, as several tunes.
1 he witness ass then ordered to 11 ithdraw, and the Attor.
vary-General was desired to call another.
. . . . .

G uisepps Bianchi was theu called, and being placed at
the bar was sworn.

Mr. Deumau thee objected to the Merl hese Spinetto being
allowed to act as interpreter of this venues 'a evidence, us
the ground of his having seen sod:conversed with him he.
fore, the Marchers bowleg in fact interpreted the deposi-
tions of the witness on the occasion of a private examination
which he had undergone previously to being called upon to
give evidence before their Lordships.
The Eael of Liverpool said, that be saw nothing in the
°Nevins' which bad bees stated by the Learned Counsel,
that he thought could by any means induce their Lordships
to order that the Marchese Spinettu should no longer ma-
tinee to net as interpreter, or that he should not be permit-
ted to interpret the evidence of the witueas now at their
Lordships' bar. He acted in this case, and it was well un-
derstood to he so, as interpreter on the part of those who
supported the Bill; and it was therefore perfectly natural,
suit as fisr as be could see perfectly nuolijectiouable, that be
should be employed by them to interpret ally previous state.
meet which the wittier might make of such facts of this case
as he could speak in cvideuce. Besides which, there was an
Interpreter in attendance on. the other side as a cheek upon
him, and he (Earl of Liverpool) did not think that any sub-
stantial objection could he grounded on the fact of hie hew-
ing been so employed, against his confine ing to perform those
duties ass interpreter, his ability, attention, and fidelity,
in the discharge of which their Lordships had had such
ample opportunity of wituessing.—(B Hear, bear, Amsr!"—
" Goes, re on.")
Mr. Peek tiles proceeded lo the examination of the
whom, _ _

Whaicepositrynssis are you ? Aa Italian Swiss.
In what part of Switzerland were you burs ? I■ the de-
pertinent of Viciso.
Whore go you live? At Venice.
What is year occupatios—what do you do at Venice? I
sea porter (duorkreper) at the Braude Brdagna Ise at
Veslee.

dam len have yen been in that employ ? Fourteen yam.

1m,411:.
.'gplevrtibltma* fa% see Ire elaiimki se • mattet shiest
Elll lauJostodoti owl Writer inn loth Wand; oat
if els alsort. writer's! wiles.
, yew swear Not you sever Isero hod soy rowowestion
ylotroso shoot piss ism tire Gomm OW. wow
Illot WON? The Geotkosess whom 1 waist d upon bad