The National Register.
London, England, 1822-01-07 00:00:00

'O4
ITHE RATIONAL REGISTER

2

7'CIESD.II" NIGHT'S GAZETTE.
DUBLIN CASTLE, DEC. 49.
The Marquis Wellesley, alto eninarked at Holyhead, at ten
o'clock a.m. the eflth instant, an ived at the harbour of Howth,
at five o'clock the same evening; and this day his Lordship,
upon entering Dublin. was received by the Lord Mayor. Alder-
men, Sheriff; and Commons of the city of Dublin.
His Lordship. attended by a squadron of dragoons, proceeded
to the Cagle, and the Council having assembled at two o'clock.
was introduced in form to his Exceilency Earl Talbot, who re-
ceived him sitting under the canopy of state in this Present.*
Chamber. from whence a procession was made in the usual suite
to the Council Chamber. The Council sitting. his Lordship's
commission being read, and the oaths administered to him, his
Lordship was invested with the collar of the Most Illustrious
Order of St. Patrick, and received the sword of state from the
Earl Talbot.
Hi► Excellency afterwards repaired to the Presence Chamber,
arid received the compliments of the nobility and other persons
of distinction, upon this safe arrival, and ta►ing upon bun the
Government of Ireland.
FOREIGN OFFICE. JAN. 1.
The King has been pleased to appoint Thomas Fonblanque.
Esq. to be his Majesty's Consul at Konigsberg. Memel, and
Pillar. and all udier ports and places in the province of East
Prussia.
The King has also been pleased to appoint Samuel Om
Ma:shall. Esq. to be his Mejeity's Consul at Calais.
other ports and places in the Depatnuents of the North, the
Straits of Calais, and the Solllllle.
The King has also beim pleased to appoint Langford Hand,
Esq. to be his Majesty's Consul at Ostend.
The King has also been pleased to approve of Don Antonio
Salinas to be Consul at Malta, kw the King of the Spasm.
BANKRUPTCIES ENLARGED.
J. D. Beaumont, Maidstone, Kent, upholstery, from Jan.
to Jan. Is.
J. Ciunie, Camberwell, baker, from Dec. 11 to Feb. 2.
BA N KRU PTS.
T. Graves. Cottenham, Cambridgeshire, butcher. Solicitor.
Mr. Crott, Chancery Lane.
.1. White. Bletchingley. Surrey, farmer. flaw Messrs.
Welchrnan and Co. Stamford Street.
T. Abbey, Pocklington, Yorkshire, ironmonger. Sol. Mr
Evans, Ha ton Garden.
G. Nude. Grantham, Lincolnshire, builder. Sols. Means.
Stocker and Co. New Boswell Court.
R. Abbey. Alne, Yorkshire. miller. Soh. Messrs. Frame
and Co. Temple.
T. Clark, Hammersmith, many scrivener. Sol. Mr. Isaac-
son, Lung Acre.
DIVIDENDS.

Jan. 16. J. Tillotson. Watley. Yorkshire, cotton spinner—lg.
P. Jane, and W. Appleton. Liverpool. saddlers—ft. R. frulprir.
Bridgewater. Somerset, draperr-Ig. T. Merrick, Frith SWIM.
Soho. mercliant--ft, T. Austin. J. Gregory. and J. Hue%
Bath, haberdashers— R. Ashby, Poultry. engraver—ft. H.
H. Whitntarsb, Wingharn. Kent. mobster —ft,. J. Hooper.
Tooley Street, chymiso...66. J. Wilson. Macclestietd, bookseller
—ft. T. Sargent. Millbank Row. Warminster. timber and
stone merchant—ft, D. Fowler and A. Annie, Gracechurch
Street. merchants--ft. T. BiJdick, St. limey, Cornwall. corn
factor—A, S. Mace, Norwich. groat-22, IL Masters, Coven.
try, tailor-14, T. Ward. Sterner. York. maltster-2Y, C. Bayly.
Abingdon, Berks. linen draper—Feb. g. H. Atkinson. Bread
Street Hill, ironmonger—t. I. Node, Beech Street. button and
trimming seller—S. J. Bend. Montagu Place. underwriter—in,
G. Laing, Commercial Sale Rooms. Mincing Lane. merchant.
CERTIFICATES to be granted Jan. 111.
J. Horsfield, Bolton. Lar.cashire, grocer—J. Bracewell, Bram•
ly. Yorkshire. innkeeper—D. Adcock. Melton Mowbray,
Leicestershire. druggist—B. Wadham. Poole. grocer—T. Cha-
rters. Manchester, tailor—S. Buttner, Oxford Street. woollen
draper.

LAW INTELLIGENCE,
COURT OF KING'S BENCH.
IFIBLINZSD•Y, J•tl. V.
Sittings at Guildhall before Ski Lord Chief Justice.
LIBEL IN THE JOHN BULL
rite KING U. INN:AVON. uNACKNLI, AND AaaowxYlr N.
This was au istiousiatious exhibited order the wiction of
the Cowl of King's Bench against the three defendaws,
charging them with the publication of a libel, rett.ctiug on
INC eh:a-deter of the Countess of Jersey.
Mr. Stearn stated the case. He wild the Earl of Jersey
wits the prime...tor. The defendants were the printer awl
proprietor* of the John Ball ace/simper. He was to be told
neither of tue defeaulmits was the author of the libel COM-
plaiutd of. The probability was, that the author would
never be known to the public. If he should unexpectedly
have the good fortune :..• be received• into the society of gen-
tlemen, the discovery of Ni.. name Must indeed, exclude
tutu. There was nothing in the matter or composition of the
I.bel to induce 'Posterity to seek sill She author, and no doubt,
he world remain 'tokenise; but Otiose who lead ilwasselves
to the malice of such sistouyistioni writers *Wald become
liable to public lattice. Mihiciuus libel was es crime Ike
must ollensive to mankind. II Ilse author of she libel in this
cave foetid have hems discovered, his advice %timid have
been to worudon the prosecution newest the ddendaiits;
but loussmuch us they rotted it advantageous to conceal his
name, it was titling they should answer its all the couse.
sequences civil sod ctiibtual. He ant sure blue Jury would
edam that the defendants ought to be responsible for the
°lichee cunitiotted in their uewspaper. in all the extrava-
gance and nialieaity of the pew, in all the acrimony applied
to public Characters, no man had been Wood ,a vout of deeo-
shin, we lost to the feelin,s'of society, us to bring a female
chataeter beim e the public, and eudeavour to blast private
character, for the purpuse cat promoting the inter. St ill poll.
twat parties. But it seems, said Mr. Scailett, au outliner
aits tit last beets foiled capable ill' writing fur the purpose oft
serving wets au object. It seems he professed a [Smogs Its.
calunimat• all those who visited her lisle Mistiest). He:
thinks, probably, be serves some ',eject reconcileable to
ISIS
own eomcwoce by that specie-, oh summit, but does he re-
elect that those win live under toe same aiouarchy may tore
as i 6666 tar plan of attack. mid it' tiny did so, what would be
the state of society I—Could a man, to serve the cause of
oily one of the Royal Fiorito., consider himself holly at
liberty to attack alt those supposed to stand it. the way cab
his object 1 If such con dett was adopted it would not
agree with Ilse gamut opinion of austiluod. The author of
the libel also thought that lie was ill liberty to traduce the
character of owls, women, mud children, for the purpose
of
putting an end to all respect for the wife of the Sovereign.—
tie no/Light lb to abuse the }tippet Perooll, and to level the
shafts of malice at every imlividuol who spewed the least
respect tor her Majesty. Its that view he held out his intim.
tiou trs'autarli. every *wean who had the respect to leave
her moue at her Majesty's dwelling. Severe indeed would be
the he*, said Mr. Scarlet.. and t would it be to every
Otivesament, if the private character ill persons who paid
seipert to tilustrium reek, were to be considered liable to
the attack of writer wit, undertook to support a par-
ticular oatject. The Countess of Jerseys name be had
never hetod worationed without respert,ous its Ilse habit of vs.
smog her late Majesty. upon which the author thought dt to
polluting the libel in question. Nothing could more tle.terst
the feeling of a lady than to become the subject of public
diwussion. It sous part of the privileges w a female to
itudiaw bons the public eye—
" Their very virtues love the shade."
Mr. Scariest then read the libel, %WWI. commenced in these
words—o We have recets,d communientions swim' the
Countess of Jersey, some of a hick shall glum tone to time
amuse our rude.* Every • must have seen we had a
kindness for Lady Jersey, and that we had spared her ; but
tut, foolish outbid' of forty has Riede herseit so oiti:solve by
toils% up the (lobe of the of Hereon', w bets every our
ihid dropped, toot die torte. herself uu our notice, of wuich
with the Weston.. of Heay. is, she shall have enough." The
libel despised the lineal cat pussecutiou. and imputed idle
talk to Lady Jersey, aho was said to be displeased with the
person who kid Lord tirey the Juke Bell declaring that
those who took in the Bali shook' never be &Admitted to her
parties. It *set oil to say, that the cooduct of Lady Jet Pry
to the {twee (termed the modest' Attention) compelled her
to go astroad, and that she had been received with aitsgust
and coldness is society. Lord Jersey would nut ult.)* his
Countess to become a tenant of the Mho ill Como, or the
permit' alai bred Bergioni."—This was toe ua.ure of tile
libel, which the learueil Counsel called upon toe Jut), to
consider a must uojustiliable ettack uu the N.sble Lady, olio
had been go tool, wandered.
The tarsi who. ist was 'lntones Wright, clerk to the alloy
ney for the prosecution, woo deposed that he purchased the
delta ysllco.,tuiuuig the Impel of the Ist cat Juiie last, at No.
.11, Jouirinies•court, Eleet.street. Oa the door, Ise sits the
names bloickell and Arrow smite." This hove had the ap-
peorauce of a private house. lie did not know either of toe
defendant*. NV lien he purchased the paper be hoard some
mews at woo k. Tae o floras Haas produced the copy of
an albnavit, signed at the stautigeffice, pussuaut to a late
Act of emolument, fur the remanent of printers and pub-
lishers. to the said ma/davit the defendants &wished them-
selves as printer and props leteof of lie John Bali, priuted tit
No, 9, Dyeembuildiugs.
Inc Sulattor-6eoetal. fur the defendants, then submitted
that the paper purchased by W right, in Johnonewcoutt
could nut be received as evidence, nod the spsestiou arose,
obi:thee there was any proof tutu the defendants were pub-
fishers of the libel. Litotes toe provisions of the Art alluded
to, adiJovits are requsied to be made by the wooer, pros
prietur, and publitmer, and if tiny public:dont %loch is the
subject of pussiolition Or lotion, coirespowls with the des-
descriptioit in the alb tai it, the parties are held Isable....ln
this case it was orgo,d, that the Jury had lio newspaper
before them publish...A mod coosequeutly
these was no piiiiir that the defend:lista were publishers.—
Weaver, Whine name Was nut oil the dour, was entirely Uhl
at' the question.
Mr. beerlett admitted the difficulty occasioned by the ab.
sescr of proof that the paper was published sa sliihrbOtele
court, but cuisteadeil tom mere Mist elabila II to go to the Jury,
iwomitech tit IL Dui for tutus to decide w nether two sot the
defendants, attache!, ant Arroosaiith, whose Inning stood
on the door, were publishei%
The Lord Chief Justice considered this it question of some
importance, as It was the Mot %%hien hail twee. lied under
the Act, bud Illerelint acceded that it ought to go to the

J ery.
ne Sulicitur•General ua% then heard for the defendants.
—He cubteutted that the &hefted libel vias not an attack on
private Chbluctcti but discussion respettlag the cuitittitt ut

_._J

%- :.

Lady Jersey, who was a partiauu daring a contest which
agitated the whole country.
The Lord Chief Justice lo his charge to the Jury, said, as
far as mpected two of the defesidmits, Shin:ken owl Arrow.
smith, they had two questions to consider. The first was,
whether it was proved to their satisfoction, that both those
persuos were publishers of the paper. If they should be of
01 they were DM, no further anew ion could passe ; but
it they thought. from the evidence bud berme shear. they
could reasonably conclude that those two p►rsons were pub-
lishers, they would then have to consiikr whether the pub-
lication be a libel. With respect toThossas Wearer he was
intitled to an acquittal. It is fur you who have heard the
paragraph is gamine to judge whether it is out obviously
menial to hold op Lady Jersey to contempt and ridicule: if
it is so intewled, it is that suit of criminal plash, anon know
iii law ►y the designatioo of libel. Gentlemen of the Jury,
it is my duty, upon that p • of the case, to staple to you
11w upsilon which I personally entertain. You will Clef •
clse your own discretion, sod either negative or Whim
wy judgment ns you may think gond :—say opinion is do.
tioctly that the publication lea Wel Gesitleamen in the Jury,
(owe inure reveal yuerotteuttoit to the ditleirence hem,.
she toe questious in the case. Thr chief, and iudred ahassst
tue only doubtful poise is—ore you s;.tiviied teat the dews'.
itrinta are the putp•ishera ul She "paper I
The Jar), utter alms' a quarter of an hour's coa•ideration,
said, that they Arid the publicestbot to be o libel t but upuu the
ground of neteetive proof as Iv the ptuperty, they Amid the
defendants—Not Guilty.
Mr. Scaliest begged that bbl Lordship (the Chief Justice)
would certify that the cause bud beets tined uplift probable
grunod, as such testrticate N.* important to toe waiter of
costs.
The 1 ord Chief Justice said it was it ease in which he
should not hesitate to certify.
THILIRODAIf. JAN. 3.
(Before the Lord Chief Justice and a Special ✓ury.)
GRIM CON.
•LADIOC O. 0011”0".
• • •

The plaintiff, a Surgeon in the 31th regiment, serving in
the East ladies, brought his action against the defendant,
Captain of a Regality' of Cavalry in the same country. to
recover •compensatiou iu damages fur Cr' sal conversation
with his wife.
The Solicitor-Gemini stated the case.—As far back as
1813, a marriage took place between the plaintiff and his
wife. She was a lady of grew beauty, nod the daughter tit
centlersau iw Ike.vasty of Yosk. At the ti.ur of the
marriage the plaintiff resided in this country, amt had no in-
trusion of gating abroad. The lady was about 2 4 sir 25
The plsiwlitt might be thirty. They had during five years
nue child. Towards the rut of 1814. Mr. and Mil,. *Lidice
went to the East Indies, with the 34th regiment. While
they relearned in that country they had too other children.
They lived happily, the plaintiff being a fond domestic huff.
baud.—los 1820 they were at Madras, and their 'wog. at
chill bad a severe illness, occasioned by the climate. They
were consequently Maimed to mod hint home to En4land
Captain Chapeau, et the bast India CUlNtillai'S ta.ryiee,
eat throat Madras. sad being related to gis. Alailice, an
arrangrateat was made to send her bane with her children
its that ship. it was aka arranged tis.it she was to reside, on
her return to England, with her mother in Yortithire...-She
aecordiugly went on board, and sailed on the voyage home.
The defendant, Captain Johnson, is-us a passenger ou board
the Slop, and, on every occasion, he bhewed a marked
at-
teuuou to Mrs. Aladice. It did no appear that he %US
kaUMUIU the plaiiitilf. There was no evide..ce to prove any
criminal intercourse between the parties on board tile ship,
but it would no doubt strike the Jury, when they had all the
facts befure them, that an intimacy consmenced iii the vestal
which led to the plaisititi 'it dishonour. On the arrival of the
ship at Southutopton, Captain Johnson accompanied Mrs.
Aladice to town. She went fast to the house of Mr. Ste-
venson, biotite, of Captain Chapman, and float thence to
lodgings taken for her at lurans-street. She was thrte
fte-
qurntly visited by Capt. Johnson, w Ito temained with her to
a late hour. Mr. Stevens made arrangements fur Min,. Ala-
dire to go to York-hire. She was acrordingls sent orby
the coach to York. About it mile (tom the Inn Captain
Jtraamal got imit the conch wilt) h. r, saymg he MilsatilliA to
St uttund. At Yolk he left her, It the srivant he was
obliged to go back to Laludia, having kit his moue) behind.
Mrs. Aladice theta went to W "why, to her niothrr and its-
tars, aud iu April following she determined to retain to Lou.
don with her two swiess. Our tit them Lilaahrth Naltier.
was at that time aiddiebsed by a gentleman 'hoard Metcalfe.
lie proposed she should come to town and proceed with Mat
and her twit sisters to France. Site accoriliii_ly came in
wan, and wrnt 10 Mier tit B • nos p t tit Certain J.. 1
visited her halt nut boor atm het ai rival, and wit. introduced
to tier Watt rs. tin Visit. New Ireton's. Amoe it fort:livid
after her arrival at Brewton a lettcr nu. feceivrd front the
plaintiff in Indio, stating hit intents'''. to r. turn to Logland.
A few tiny. 'Atte her sister went into the return and toui.d her
in tears, and Captain 'Johnson iu peat contusion. Mr.
Metcal.e having palmed tickets for the Opera on the night
the King went, legated Mrs. Aisidit e and her sisters to go.—
Alta Aftdice declined list invitation, Mid Mr. Metcalfe went
with the two sisters. Doting their absence Mrs. Alutlice
remained alone with Captain Johnson all 'he evening. Tins
look place On the 13th of May laid, autistic soon altered her
intention of g • g to lettuce with her sitters. Sae wished tie
go alone. Accordingly towards the latter end of May she
proceeded alone to Rover. She was met at the inn door by
Capt. J. who %tent w ith bee to Calais. In the mettatone
man Inge had taken place between her sister ancl3lr.Nlet • :site.
who were at Lite. She resided iii France till the month of
September, where rise received trequeut visits horn Clptiliti
Jokossm. In the sat-e moods of September she returned
to
England, and she again took lodgings iu Brampton-low.--
In Octolter the plaintiff shrived in England, mid wits re•
cleaved by his wife, not as he had mice been, but under
consireiot and coldness. In comeguente of the et tlection
of w hat her aSection had berm, she fell unto a lit ut
tears. Mt. Aladice attributed this sensibility to her at.
tection, and a report which had been spread of its death.
He coritinued to reside with her a fortight, never sot-
pectitig any Impropriety On het part. it happeued, how-
ever. that Mrs. Manlier felt that she was pregnant by
Captai Johnson, and that it was imssible to cony e.ll
it onto het husband. It was a case tipputos the whoie niti-
fled to ample d swages.
Witnesses writ then called, who eotirely supported the
statement of the Solicitor General.
Atte' au able charge from the Lord Chief Justice, Ott
July found a verdict tor the plai iiii 11.--Damages
t ,latt. 4.
LIBELS ON HEK LATE MAJEST Y,
THIS &MG V. WEAVeIt AND °Thiene.
This was an indictment against the defendants, W iiiii ,
• Shaekell, and Atrowsuntli, fur the publication of critam

paragraphs, alleged to be libels on her late Majesty, con.
tabled in the papers called John Ball, of the 23th of Feb.
the 11th of March, the Bth of April, the 1116 of May,
and the 27th of May, 1821.
Mr. Ty lidell olideseit the pleadings.
Mi.DenlUilti Oily stated, that this prosecution the law
'Accra of her lattniajesty had timid it neessery to insti-
tute for alas purpose of be ingiog top
had dared to pntblialt some of the most atrocious libels
that ever disgraced the Press of Ibis cosentry. If the
• 'necessity of this proceeding was felt during the life of
',the Queen, It was not less necessary at the present day.
_Thuile who held the situation of her Majesty's law °Meer.,
were discuntitsued at her death. He merely mentioned
' that circumstance to account for the absence of her late
hlajesty's Attoiney-Gesieral, who otherwise would have
addressed the Jury. They bad thane,' it their duly to
aeleci the five linels which he had to bring forward, as
publicatiens, which he thought it impossible they could
suffer to escape. belepentlesit of attachment to the
Queen, their duty to the public, and the general interest
I f society, demanded that the defendants should be pu-
nished. 'the lust libel, in the Juba Usti of the 23th of
February, was liewled by the name of Mr. Wilberforce,
and the author. who professed to have great zeal fire reli-
gion, cotividered that he was exercising that zeal by a
furious attark upon the religious feelings of that gentle-
man. It was not, however, for the libel on Mr. Wilber-
fin ce that they complained, but it was necessary his name
should lie mentiotied, to emivince the Jury that her late
Majesty was the person pointed at in the libel. Before
lie stated the libel., :le was desirous of saying a few words
on the name of the evidence they iutended to lay before
the Jury, iu order to make the defendants liable. They
haJ gruel' abe by experience, and they meant to prove
beyond the possibility of doubt, the conn:xion of the
parties, and that they were joint prissier. and publisher's
of the libels. The first question would be, whether any
or all of She pat imiaphs were libels on her Majesty.—
With respi ct to the liability of the defendants. they_ in.
Imided to pot in the original affidavit at the Stamp-office,
which stated that Weaver was the Printer of the News-
paper called John !tall, and Shackell and Arrowsmith
sole kiroptietUris t that the Paper was to be printed in
Dyel 3s-buildings, Hulborn, and called Joh* Rua. The
Jury %volt(' field Ilse first ten numbers were printed in
Dyeeshuildings ; the eleventh, containing the libel, was
printed iii JittallSon't court, Fleet-street, and it would ap-
pear all the lib. Is were published by the defetidauts at the
step or office, where two of their HOWL were over the
the door. The delendants were persons jointly liable to
the I and watch rates in the parish of St. Dunstan.—
Shackell and Arronsinith paid rates for the house in
Joheison's court, Fierti.treet, and also for the shop in
Fleet-stseet. where the Paper was likewise published.—
The three men were all active in promoting the pit:rhea.
• . It would be to evidence that a bill of exchange
was given in payment for advertisements iu the John
which bill was indussed by Weaver. With respect to
Sliackell and Ariuwsmith, the collector of rates would
prove boll' these defendants paid rates for Nu.
court 5 in short, the publication would appear
us clear as possible to he the joint act of the defendants.
—The L +wird Conner' then drew the attentio., of the
July to the libels. 'fast tat the 2511 iof February, after
utit ))) i) ig Mr. fusee in dam ispectful terms, the
author hilds--•• We cannot believe that the only place
where imniumilly I. to he rereived with decency, can be
house of Gird, and that the only place where her halite
is to he received without a blush is at the table of the
Lord." The t,ecotail libel, of the 2J of March, contained
the following passage--" When we see old Thames
change his course alyd flow back fr.mi Westanineter to
Henley, we will believe the Queen is i etiiriiing hack to
the cuaduct of a vii tuous woman." The libel of the 8111
of April stated, that the Queen hail been declared godly
of adultery by the highest tribunal of the country ; hurl
name etci ided lions the Liturgy, and that she admitted
it, :mil mut: the price of her isititille. She was snaking
etforts to he stetiveo into society. That cis conistinice
did hot surprise the a rite'', but they did not expect Lord
Jr's• y vied Lot d cricy would sanction .ins visit, of their
Lountesves to a is °wail convicted of adultery. Tl.eit
wen Svc yviiiiien equally pure 'A 1141 Vatitutis as Lady Jetsy,
ho woo d not visit prolligacy--..• • •.—Litily
Jersey was huh away by her levee' for the to
approach the infection of Brandenburg!' !louse, are."—
Li the next libel ill the I Its of May, the writ.. deviated
las ntaelauuu 10 attack all females mentioned in the The
Cl/4roniae and The hones, as vl,llols of the Queen. Tile
paragiapli of the 27th of May, charged the Queen with
skulking to the Opera, under the intine of Mrs. Jsuu~s, ea
a mete of ins trinity, and el there niermig with the et y of
—Oat f 0.1.1-1 Away! Jfc.—These insinuations Mr. Denman
declared so be false in every respect, nod eutichided by
ilepressatiog in the strongest terms the several pas-ages lie
had team—Nothing but the strong &rill of the law could
deal with the system of such a writer.
Mr. Sakes, Solicitor to the Stamp-office, produced the
athilas it of the tierce defendants.
shi. Taut/twit proved the hand writing of Shaekell,
Ailowsndib, and Weaver.
'(hr affidavit beteg read, proved the defendants were
Ps inters and Proprietou a of the Julio Bull. _The atfidevit
had twilling to du with another Paper called the Real
Jahn Ilsial.
51r, Mal iron, the Registrar of Newspapers at the Stamp
°thee pioducril Nu. lii of the John sups publiehril tau
• Fiehrosery 19, It purported to he ['mimed by R. T.
Wearei, Hulborn, and published lay
hilli at Nu. 11, Julinsolea-rout 1, Fleet-street. The wit
pooduced No. 11, (Feb. 25, 1821), published by
11 , aver, in Johnson's court.
Mr. March, cult, ctur of taxes fur Fleet-street and John-
sou's-cons t, stated that the person rated to alie hooey, No.
to, Johnsoh's emu!, fur watch-rate at the beginning of
18X1, was The num primal NA% sated
for No. 11, the bathe court. The udit• was made afire
Lady Hay, 1621. II teas made fur the ;Ml' of March.—
lie did not know who paid the preceding sate from
ilitistialas lu Laity Day, 1821. 'the rate fur the follow-
Mg quarter was lip to Miami:enter, end William Shaekell
hurl Thomas Allowsinith wire toted fur Nor.. It) and 11.
tae witilel.lo ieveived the rates ma the 7111,4 May and ii„•
it ot °chilies'. hunt Mr. Sliaekell and Mt. Al sow ram tn.
lie received isti Iwo trial-tell. He did nut kliuw whether
the names nem ucur the door. Ilistahros was
rattled on lit the 11011 s,. The Jolla) 111111 tall sold in
Fleet-street. He dial taut hi the number of the Lim's•
or shop. 'The bathe Juliti Bull was Over the door. The
received tates for that shop friars Sheath. After
Match 18.0, Mr. Sltackell gave the witness uuttee of kit