The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1820-10-10 00:00:00

'Pesaro' in 1819 On my return from Venire I 'called at her
Papal Highness's villa at Pesaro.

How long did you remaiu Mere I retrained there two
4.49. Her Royal Highwess was out when I called ; she was
eat airing whew I called, bet on ►er return she sent her ear-
.iacw, walkout of In r equerries anti Mr. Austin, to that

%ad rw went? I did.
—lw 444,6466,

e-.V. e

.that 1 Volved stailt,

.....
_
nappeddaten tthaticreniss,....siad then retained to
1 n. w
an 410 i palm aropliala=lingail 411glintna ...she.
'Li:O.:lug Jay? Flee Royal neat her carriage and
her Illernerey, to show sew volinarrar *as worth eerie( in the

1,, woof Pesaro.
Ma& woe afterwards •waft no her Loyal flobstess at her
t.-..v31? I returned there to dinner, anti dined with her.
2014 rwr sprol the evening in eonspany with her Royal
kiighsess! After having walked with her Royal Highness
!suet the grounds, 1 yerwained stoat an tutor, soil thee pre.
:..ailed ou a• :tourney, as f wished to go to Senegatlin, it
beldg th► last day of the fair.
• Had you the honour of paying your reepeets to her Me.
,esty after she bad missed the title of the Queen of Lag-
oon? At Nome.
When was that In iNtO.

• WHY you tate the month, or if pomade the day 011ie
amotif, t hardly know the day of the month; I received
as amount of the King's death in February.
Had ehe assumed the title and dignity of Queen of Emi-
t Ate? :Moe halt.
Had she two Ladies of Honour then appointed to alleged
bet; Mae end no!.
Was auy guard of honour at her butyl' There was none.

Re...Mele-a, did persons of risk, both of Ronse and
I:attend, do themselves the honour to pay their respects to
Ler Majesty? Certainly.
• RNs the goodness to name some? There was the Conn.
fess • I speak of those who woos their names id
bet Majesty's hook.
• Did you see them do so
Mr. Demoau—l know we ought to have the
Memo did you see? 1 saw wont ;• I only know that they
did call.

do yon -happen to know from any thine that pewit, whe-
ther it wa. then untiessht..4 that ihr funeral of his late Ma-
1. sly had teen place' 1 ilsink• it had.
**vs *a% Dergenti Chainherldin to her Majesty in 1819,
and in In2o alum? He was.

11'a}-there tiny diffeeesice in the general appemanceof her
lioucebold betteren those period.. None.
Ditt you eee► wee soy Tbiog in the ciowsloct of the two pur.
lies towards each other in the slightest &Tree derogatory to
the English empire, or likely to wound the mural feelings of
the no unrs Never.

twirl...mkt" of the conduct of her Royal Highness to-
•U& BF ell NO, did yon in any other respect ever perceive
that her Majesty ever conditeted berarlf either in public
or prttrate,in either way, to winch • just objection could be
Vtltres

The Mlortiey-Ceencral—" I object to that."
Mr. Dennetn—" Mr Attorney General, I am looking to
'the tilers'.- of the Rill, which 1., that in politic and private,
mut wily with reaper, to Berpmi, hut in other respects, her
Majetty the Queer of England tondnetril herself in Ruch a
manner at to tiring deigrate on Him country. and to wound
• immoral feeling,. Here M a person who has hail an oppor-
tunity at three distinct periods, of forming a judgment of
her tontlinrt bosh public and prirate. It is perfectly coo-
• anitetn. my Lorna, that I should a.k that goes ."
• The land fibingeltur—" If we proceed regularly, we
vlaritild first hear the Counsel who objects to tire (python."
• "Ilse Attorney Geweral--" I take it to be a leading
question;'

Mr. licoughano--" Wr, on the other hand, maintain that
It to bot."

The Lord Chancellor—" I do not see that it is objection-
able ad • leadlnir question." •
Lord Liverreail admitted flint it was part of the chance.
_ .

The Lord Chaurellor said that wills rispect to its being
d►rogato,y to the country, that could only be the wiiiiess's
opinion, bee I r did out say that that ought to have no
w ibooght it ought to be reeeietd.
The question was ordered to be repeated, sod the witness
said, to ncv.v.disl.

The Lerl of Liverpool said, be would jest throw out one
puint..becanne•hr bad not the slightest objection to any pro•
:per question pet. Hr hoped their Lordships would consi-
der i• tacit minds bow far the 9nestiim on the other side
respecting his opinion would go, because if that subject
was in he gone into at all, as to what was the opinion on
Vie continent of bee conduct, he conceived they opened a
shun as to impropriety of conduct. Ihe Counsel fur the
. •I had not lunched wpm& that point.

The Loral Chaise,llor—a My Lora., I do sot apprehend
tint this writers, was so.ked what was theiroeral opinion on
t,..: C 041141.411, but the question was, *bat woo this wiloess's
opiniutriiii his own iihstrvattous?" _ _

At all the times whim you have arms her Royal Nielsen@
at.d Wrgsmi togetlwr, did be treat her wells the respect due
to bee quality and rank i• I never saw him behave other-
wi,r don with tow• utmost respect.
kio Jegradisig familiarity, was there? Nose whatever.
Crass e.raattard by the At toraey.Ceiterst.
—• •

Did Reigate, di** at table every tune you dosed al her
Re yet Higbee's', sit Rome! He did.
Where did lw sit? He but nu particolar place that I can
recollect ' • I have win htut at various parts of the table.
I think I osiderspied yea in say that besides seeing Rey-
Lieu at the table of her Royal Highness, you have seen her
-Keys! Highness tied Berflasiki at other places in Rome .! I
artlW them attesiling the Corpus Doasisi together; I saw
illergatni its atieedanee epos her Royal Highsates.
. _

In what manne► was he in attendslice • As Chamberlain.
Where was her kora Highness • In a box prepared for
Ivor by Government.

Whore was Dergami? Behind her Royal Highness.
Standing'ui sitting? When I saw him be was standing.
Was there slay 'other of her suite with her at sb.t time'
ter-sloth.

Flow mass tits.' did jot' dime eiiii her Royul Highness
•t 'tome? Ou the Ana uccasiun l dined with hrr titles ur
tour times certsiulf.
A miny as three or four times' Quite •s many.

Yen stated that persons called on her Royal Highness st
Rome; del yore Sentember she names of those persons The
Ladles that were it attendance opoil her were generally
there—there were many Cardinals vistaed her-1 met Corin-
na, aoasalvi going up stairs sit I was going down. There
were many others beyldes.
If Mesh went MAI other persons, probably yon will have
no difficulty in recolketing their names usually dined
with her Royal' Highness, slut after dinner' 1 quitted her,
and the persons usu,ally Caine in the evening.
• Were you there In the evening Once ur twice; her Ma-
j•sfy seas lodged at The Inn at this lime; she bad nu esta-
blished house at Rome.
When you say Shit 'ot/fer persons of distinction visited
her Majesty in the evening, are you speaking from what you
beard, or from your onn personal knowledge ! From any
own personal knowledge from tbe evenings 1 passed there.
Theis from ibeeVeming, itni passed there, can you enu-
merate any of the, persons of distinction sawn you hate
mentioned ' The tveniug 1 was there Ido not remember
other names than those 1 hive metiti )))) ed.
Yost hive staled that in Isl 9, you visited her Royal
Haglin as iss Pesaro ; when run called she was rot at home
but Chat one of the Equerries and Wm. Austin called upon
.con—who was that theealrer
Uid Itergausi sup with her Royal Highness) He slid.
Did lie dime with you on the following day! He did.
. .

What tither persons timed est that OVCIRSIOO There were
IN ltersevn het that of her Majesty's attendants.
Can you mention the 11.1111C4 of the pawns of her Ma-
j.-OY' establishment • who dined with yllll at Pesaro" Vas-
bati.lgersami, the Countess Oldi, and Win. Austin; the names
of Iwo oils, r pet ...ins at table 1 sin' 1211411 quango,' with.
Was Luigi liergann uue ul the ushers' I cannot say
that he was, bccaure I am net auto that I am acqualuted
with his person.
Whether he was tone of these two you cannot say' 1
twin 4.
Are those the occasions which you have mentioaed that
you had the uppurtunity of seeing her Royal Highness at
Ition • and l'esaru ' They were.
And list unly ones' Yes.

Re.exasioted 7.y Mr. Peons*,
Had you the Wave*: being stegnolmad with her 'loyal
Highness-before slat WI Eggpilet ? .141411+ -
By a Peer—gied,goo *eel any' olijodhlie.lowit-tiews to
table with Rergansi? Nolte whatever.
Lord .Derrlimetoo-1 understood you tear lible pipe have
lionaitS flaified.al 'lope; I b
tt it:42,Ard... last
flesh Rene? tte Itorae lu tire -
jaAprtl NW. Yes..
Did you leave in eonseqaeace of bearing that there 'Wes
to be, or hkety to be proceedings aphid the threat ?
irsr/I I:—t Wish Warkirlielger, in 1S1; lie saw
any English Laity in bee smile ! At tfise period of the year
that her Royal Highsees was at Rowse there were but feel
English-1 do sot remember to hive Sir's soy.
. Lard Mansfield—Mr. Mills ha. .tat that when her Ma.
jesty was at Rome, io 1620, she look the title and dignity
of Queen of England, does Mr. Mills know whether, In the
ro"lwi, bee Majesty was styled as Queen of Eugland ? 1
have heard—

Cries of " No, no^
The Lord ChanceDora—That questicia causal be pot:
Lord Maas&l.l—l allied whether he knew ;
The Lord Chancellor—l oppreeend that the ooly wsyrolof
knowing the aliments of the passport is, by asking whetter
soy application was made ?
Does Mr. Mills Itotiw of any applicar being made es
the part of her Majesty to the Goverwinent of Rouse for
purports? No, the application was matte to Ilw• British
Cutout.
Du you know whether the application was made by her
Majesty to the British Corsol fur passports, by the title mot
dignity of the Queen of England ? I know that it was.
Ry the Attorney-Gentral—How do goo know it ? Her
Majesty told me so.
The Lord Chancellor observed that hearsay ev?dence could
not be received, rind the question■ mot answers relative to
the passports were orderid to lie expliogeil from the minutes.
By the Lord Chancellor—Did you know of your own
knowledge that Bergsma had Area a servant to her Majesty,
and waited at table ? No; I only knew it by common
ri port.
Thu Loral Chancellor—Common report is not evidence.
Dv lord Filitnonoth—You have said you were in company
with the Countess ttlslt ; Yee. _

Did you make any observation on her manners ? Yes,
they were ustobtinsive.
Were they the manners of an ballast Lady Certainly
they were.
Was her language good Certainly; she spoke in the
scrent of Lombardy.
lltd von consider on that sernunt there was any vulgarity
in her language' Certainly ant.
By Lord Ellewhornugh—Did yon think the language
spoken by 'Pc Cuunitais filth in he spoken by her gramma.
firstly and correct?-1 am nut a sufficient judge of grant.
mar to tindettalte in answer (bar question.
Did you observe that she made use of any bad grammar?
Certainly tint.
By Earl Grey—Pow lung have yule been iu England'
1 arrive:l in England in the month of May last.
. .

Since you have been to England, and this 801 l bronght in,
'many application made to you respecting the conduct of
her Majesty in Italy' Never.
The Witness was then ordered to withdraw.
Joseph Feuille seas 07 n.zt witness, ezamined by
.IJr Williams.
Were you in the military service of the late Viceroy of
Italy? I was. _ _ .

W.
hat rusk did you bold? I was a Colonel on the
Staff.

_
Dui you ',clung lu Ih. Legion of Honour' Yes.
had lou a bruthrr • General of Division ill that service'
Yi•.

Were you his A iole-de Camp' Yea.
pnl yon know Ilsrtholonsew Brresnoi Yes.
Where did you first know him? 1 knew him fulfilliag
the fuoetious of a Quartermaster of a regiment of hussars.
What sear was that in? It was shout the end of the year
1800, or floe beginning of the year 1901.
1841 your brother, the General, at that time command the
regiment Brillion, brimmed to? My brother was a General
of Brigade at that time, which consisted of two regiments,
one of hoo ..... , the other of charaenrs, Bergamo Isrlougo ol to
the fu iner regiment. _

rre you Aide de Camp to your brother at that time'
was.

%Viral was the conduct of Bergami at that time? Der-
garni'. conduct was that of a non commissioned officer who
had nothing to reproach himself with, for his conduct never
was contrary to tiiar of a gaud ,rr.
Was that his general Character ? It wan.
Do you real* from the same part of the country as Ber-
ismi ? Wa are of the same country.
Did you ever Kt him as any of the dinner parties of the
getters!, your !fret her ? No.
Did yore ever see Demerol at the evening parties of your
brother, the General? I did not see him, but I hours he
went so the General's house of no evrnine. _

Did you continue acquainted with Bergami from that
time, or. was there an interval between your agate erring
Aim' A great deal of time intervrited bofore 1 saw hint
*gain.
►%here was it that you mw Bergami again On the from
fiefs of Spain.
In what year The latter end of the year 1808, or the be-
ginning of the year lane. It was when the Fiench combin-
ed army was about to enter Spain.
is whit situa•ion was Brrgami then in lie belonged to
the Imitoeholil of General Ptour wino commanded a division
of the Italian army.
How was he treated by General Ptuo I With s great deal
of combilence.

Dol you visit G I Pino! Yes, I visited him when the
business of the service required
Did vu• see Bergauti um those occasions? I have seen
him sometimes, not Mways.
Do you know whethe► Hergnmi dined with General Pino
when be gave dinner parties? 1 cannot know that.
Mist estimation was Bergami held iu at that time by
General Pow and the officers of the army? Hr was looked
ou as a man who wits of the Rooted confidence with Ge-
neral Pion; he had the whole confidence 4.f the General.
tYlial esteem was he held in by the other officers? He was
much esteemed, liked, and respected by them, as ass honest
111111th.