The National Register.
London, England, 1816-04-07 00:00:00

and that was the great simrce of her evils. His remedy there-
Aire, would be to make all pm suns hi Ireland, high and low,
obedient to the law. There w ait a great error in the educations
of the Irish : and that was, that they were not taught proper obe-
dience to their parents. For the peasant only corrected hits son
by Limekiln: him iliiwn ;that was his mode of teaching hint obe-
dience—( 1 long!! iiistanrud the ieiiiimisy of the Irish to-
ward, the English prow ietors of land : One of them, who lived
on the late Earl of Slielliarne's est .'c, being told that the Noble
Owner was a Fitsanaitriee. said, " a Ft:am:wrier ! What are
they?—Fellows that came in with Stronghow!"—This was the
tllinntOn expression of contempt of the OStillirans and the
O'Donaglines, who comidered themselves the aboriginal Irish
people.
The Earl of C %NARY AN supported, and the Earl of ST. GEn-
pi ANS opposed the motion.
Lord not.LAND and Lind CriuN% mks: supported the motion
for a Comnii; tee.
Lord st ninon TN opposed the motion.
The Na' penis of Itticaincua 'coiled. The Mast, then di-
♦ided. For the motion tit--.lg4iitst it Majority 70.
Adjonrue,l at Half- past Two.
(Wednesday and Thursday nothing of public interest oc-
curred.]

rRIRiV, APRIL S.
MILITARY OBSTRUCCIONS IN THE STREETS.

The rarl of ESSEX called the attention of the House to an
outrage offered to his person, in the avenues to Parliament.
He complained that he was stopped in his carriage, by a soldier
with a drawn sword, at the end of St. James's-street, who re-
fused to let him pass, and struck the horses with his sword.
This be considered not only a breach of privilege as a Peer of
Parliament, but a proceeding dangerous to the freedom of the

subject.
The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, the object he had in view in
placing soldiers round the avenues of the palace was only for
the purpose, of preserving order.
Lord OrtaNsti.LE considered the practice of placing the
military at the Levee a dangerous proceeding, adverse to the
constitution, and deserving of reprobation. The cis it pours.,
namely coastabies and magistrates, could only be employed,
uoless the peace WdS broken.
The LORD CHANCELLOR was of opinion the civil power
ought to be employed; yet he had no objection to see the
either do the duty of a citizen in preserving the peace.
The Marquis of BUCKINGHAM asked the Secretary of
State for the Home Department, whether tin re would be a re-
currence of the interruption complained of?
Lord SU/MI:MTH said, in consequence of what had passed
yesterday, he felt it incumbent on him to take care that civil
officers iu future shall he stationed in all parts of the town
where the military are employed.
After some further remarks from Lords Grey, Holland. and
Buckingham, the subject was disposed of, en assusilllCC hying
given that the constables and magistrates are in future to be
employed instead of the soldiery.
Lord LANSDOWNE, after a speech of considerable length,
/loved for a return of the aincoded estimates for the service of
the year, and after a long debate, his motion was agreed to.—
Adjourned.

HOUSE OF COMMONS, Moknav, APRIL 1.
LORD ELLr.N BOROUGH.
LerdCncoaartr rose to present another charge against Lord
lElleeittorotigh,which,lieobserved,could not by any construction,
be tortured into an implication of any of the other Learned
Judges. The charge was delivered in. It accused the Noble
Lord of partiality and oppression, in refusing to hear the noble
Lord (Lord Cochrane), on applying for a new trial; and, with
'misrepresentations, iodating a false conclusion on his trial, in
respect to the evidence given against him ; and by such misre-
presentations, impressing Mr. Justice Le Blanc with a wrong
idea of the merits of the case, which led to the infamous and
unjust sentence pronounced against him.—The Noble Lord
moved, that the charge be printed.
Mr. B. BATHURST conceived that the charge went to incul-
pate Mr. Justice Le Blanc, who was accused of passing an un-
jest sentence, though the Noble Lord had stated he did not
mean to in pis ,n the conduct of that Learned Judge. The
Right Hon. Gent. then moved that the further consideration of
the question be adjourned till Friday next. Agreed to.
WAR MALT TAX.
Mr. LvTrtyrosi asked in what manner the Right lion. (len-
tleman meant to dispense with the. Malt-tax ; what drawback
be intended to allow; and what his general object was in giving
relief?
Mr. Vanstrran? observed, that a Bill was in preparation
en the subject. lie had already stated, that the Maltsters
would be entitled to the re-payment of the duty which they
may have paid for the stock in hand. In order to prevent the
stagnation arising to the Brewers, art arrangement would be
wade also for taking an account of the stock in hand, as in the
4rmer case, up to the sth of July, so that they might be en.
led to brew to that period ; when the War Malt ditties would
repaid to them for the whole of their prevent Mock.
Mr. CALVERT was afraid, that the Right Hon. Gent, had
vats Ie d the Norse ; for he believed that he wished the dower
to rew as fast as he could, and lie would give him a propor-
ttod‘f the Agar Maltdnty up to the sth of July ; but If he did
not brew at all, then he was to lose the whole of the ditty on
/dock in hand allowed to him.
Mr. V sustiv %try ..vas disposed to enter into the question
with every degree of kherality ; arrangements 'night be wade
for beer already brewed, as well as if the brewer continued
to brew up to the sth of July.