The National Register.
London, England, 1809-02-05 00:00:00

REV ST ER.'

Q. Neither.
Q. Did Roetfie
Thymic apt-died
Q. Did she

Thursday, and that the exchange was Gazetted on the succeed-
ing Saturday ? A. I did not.
Q. Has the witness told the House all she knew on the sub-
ject? A. 1 have told the House no more.
I.:444;aßatl3sa4regyownald the • House every ;thing youohave told
Col. Wardle on the subject A. Yes, and a great deal wore.
On the requiition of Mr. Brand, the witness was ordered to
withdraw, and the Hon. (ientleman. then stated, that the ten-
dency of the Attorney-General's questions was to impeach the
veracity of. Mr. Wardle,•w,hich
,he did not eonslder a fair course
of procedure toward, his Hon. Friend.. .
The ATTORNF.r-GEN ERA L denied that such was by any means
his intention. W hatevo questions he had felt it his duty to
.to.the witness, was with the sole view of impeaching her vent--;
city alone, and he trusted what he. hat said, and what he should
hay, would convince-the House, of her whole..story being a mall- •
cious fabrication, and not entitled to any credit. • Ile. was' far e•
frOm thinking that any. thing
.he could saysto.ex pose .her false- •
'hoods could in the least acct. thg veracity-0312dr. Wardle, twig
nothing could he farther from his . • .
The .witne:s was then called io, and re-examined by.the At-
trirney-General.--Q. What-circumstances have 3,9 U communi-
cated to the Howe which vou did not state to Mr. Wardle? A.
1 did not intimate to Mr. Wardle that a servant of the Duke of
York had got me change for the note., which I got dour,. that .1
,might leave some money with my servants whin. I weal out of,
town.

9. What other circumstances did yon relate to tGe House that.
you had not told Col. Wardle ? A. I said very- little to Mr.
Wardle at all. Ile had heard the story froni otherpeople, and
asked
.me whether it was true,•and t ansWeredyes.
. Q. If. Col. Wardli had not asked you to till him, had yOu
any intention of mentioning it yourself ? _Perhaps T might
and perhaps not.
Q. Had you any particular object to answer when you men-
tioned it to him, or to any other person ? •A. None whatever.,
Q. Had you any end to accomplish by making it known to
the public? A. Certainly' not. • • ,
Q. Did you ever statitliat you bad any grounds of complaint
against the Duke of York ? Ail' friends kno4v.tbat I have
grounds of complaint against him.
Q. Did you ever state thetulo any person ? A. No, I never'
.did.

Q. Did you not, state,.:thitilf his Royal' Highness did not set-
tle your demands upon him, that you would expose' him pub-,
licly? A. told Mr. William'Adam, in a letter, that if be
.did not pay me my annuity regularly, which he and the Duke
=of York had• Vrotnised me, that I would expose the letters of
Royal Highness, which he had at different times sent me.. -
That was all I said.

Q. Did you not, at varinui times, tify to different people,
that if the Duke of York ilid'not come to your teens-you would
expose him ? A. No, neter, in my lifet to any peiso'n
ever, nor should Is willidgly do itnow. Mr. Adam, wAii,ert
angry at the letter I sent • him ; and that's all I ever did..
Q. Was it only one letter wherein you threatened. to sxposti
his Royal Highness ? I wrote two letters.
Q. Did you threaten to expose the Duke in both the letters., •
A. Yes ; but they were never sent.
Q. What became of theta ? A. I suppose 14r. Adam 'has
got t hem both by him, and he can produce them. : : •
Q. In those les.:ers did you-say, that if ythlr solieitatidits
were not complied with that you. o ould expose the Mute'?
I wish you would ask Mr. Adam for the letters. •
Q. Did you ever state to othei persons, that if plitr detpatidf
were not complied with, that, you lyouyi expose: the-Duk,
York ? Np, never did, I 'am• quite certaip.-. " 7
Q. Did you ever 'tell Mr. Witt ale that yot wanted 2601. foie
any particular purpose ? A. No. I did not.'
Q: Did you ever say to Mr: It. Itnip:ht, that the Doke'of
York had ill treated you, and that you was detersolined to ex 4
pose,him.? A.-Nos, I did not.
Q. You are sure you did not say so, nor anything like itl
A . No. told him rshouldhe compelled to publish iiie.Putee of
York's lettors, to enable me to iw,my czetl49rs; which he
fefilsed to Pay..
Q. Did NI K

MI a visit v

)luotarily- or did yoe

1.• • - ',. . • .4'.,,t;') • ' • • . • Q. Did Mr. Knight pay you a visit voluntarily, or did yo 4
,n the witness • - si ;.-..- • of the month or of the send for him ? 'A. Ido not recollect.
•
1 which Dr. ' ~;-,
„. 41.
4,0.',. . , Neither the Q. Upon what occasion did you mention him to 111 r. Knight! . •
ie aiontb 'no o, 4'. ' • .4:
.. per. --V:. A. After the Duke of York had sent me a message; in ' limiter •
•`•. \ .
ither A::',. A. cr/ ri. 1 ' ..i'''..,•• ', •,•,-,*, 'r ~ tea' message 1 sent him for a few hundred pitundsOhna:nnuit
~.
d nonfie 'I0!? trotiktt, ?;::,
.'; -,,141.,., tat day Dr; plead my marriage or go to jail".
Lpplied to h • 4'\ ~-• "1ty.'".1., :74/...e. • Q. When was that message sent to you? 1i: Aboiii.airwe49 1 •
fk,
..r:k. i .7-. '‘ 4 •.' ! $'
i she Opt tel i i :‘, • .1-- 014. 1-, '•• •as Jade' on ' ago. •My lawyer can tell to whom it was Sent. A
• Y. & llir 4.4/ . ''.,:.(i 440 . • .
j" ) . -I: j.
. . .
. ..
: •• ' . . •