The Sun.
London, England, 1855-05-21 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY EVENING, MAY 21, 1855.

detachments occupying it, of the 30th and 49th Regiments,
under Captain Z't'ijjiamson and Lieutenant Gubbins, of the
Hr, who, un•
r, I ; i I ogret to have

tO a ~; Selie :1,,,,-corinniadionAlufficers and
men were killed and wounded on the occasion.
On the same night Captain Arnold,* of the 4th Foot,
was wounded and taken prisoner, whilst posting the
advanced sentries on the left attack. The loss of the ser-
vices of this officer is greatly to be lamented. He had
done duty unremittingly, and in the most spirited man-
ner, throughout the operations of the siege.
I inclose the return of casualties to the 6th instant.
I have heard that six ships, having on board Sardinian
troops, have arrived in the Bosphorus.
I have, &c.,
the Lord Panmure, &c. &o.

RAGLAN.

* Intelligence has since been received of the death of
Captain Arnold.

Enclosure 1.
RETURN OF CASUALTIES FROM THE 4TH
TO THE 6TH MAY, 1855, INCLUSIVE.
2d Battalion, Ist Regiment of Foot-1 rank and file,
wounded.
4th Foot 1 officer missing.
7th F0..t,-2 rank and file, wounded.
14th Foot-2 rank and file, killed.
18th Foot.-1 rank and file, killed.
23d Foot-3 rank and file, wounded.
30th Foot-1 serjeant. 3 rank and file, wounded ; 1 rank
and file, missing.
34th Foot-1 rank and file, m ounded.
41st Foot-1 serjeant, 4 rank and file, wounded.
47th Foot-1 rank and file, killed.
49th Foot-3 rank and file, killed ; 1 officer, 15 rank
and file, wounded ;1 serjeant, 1 rank and file, missing.
57th Foot-1 rank and file, wounded.
89th Foot-1 rank and file, killed; 1 rank and file,
wounded.
90th Foot-3 rank and file, wounded.
2d Battalion Rifle Brigade-A-1 rank and file, killed ; 1
rank and file, wounded.

Total-9 rank and file, killed ; 1 officer, 2 serjeants, 35
rank and file, wounded ; 1 officer, 1 serjeant, 2 rank and
file, missing.

J. B. BIICKNALt ESTCOURT,
Adjutant-General.

Enclosure 2.
NOMINAL RETURN OF OFFICERS WHO HAVE
• BEEN WOUNDED FROM THE 4ia TO THE 6TH
MAY, INCLUSIVE.

WOUNDED.
MAT 5.
41th Regiment of Foot.
Lieutenant G. Rochfort, severely.
J. B. BUCKNALL ESTCOURT,
Adjutant-General.

Enclosure 3.
NOMINAL RETURN OF OFFICERS MISSING,
FROM THE 4TH TO THE 6TH MAY, 1855, INCLU-
SIVE.

MISSING.
MAY 5.
4th Regiment of Foot.
Captain W. T. Arnold was taken prisoner, and is sup-
posed to have been wounded, previously to falling into the
hands of the enemy.
J. B. BUCKNALL ESTCOURT,
Adj utant-General.

Enclosure 4.
NOMINAL RETURN OF NON-COMMISSIONED
OFFICERS AND PRIVATES KILLED, FROM
4TH TO 6TH MAY; 1855, INCLUSIVE.

KILLED.
MAY 4.
11th Regiment of Foot.'
Private Patrick Callaghan.
Private George Walker.
89th Regiment of Foot.
Private Henry Nicholson.
2d Battalion Rifle Brigade.
Private Thomas Turner.
MAY 5.
47th Regiment of Foot.
Private John Forsyth.
49th Regiment of Foot.
Corporal William Kent.
Private Andrew Ash.
Private Patrick Creighan.
MAY 6.
18th Regiment of Foot.
Private Daniel Walpole.
J. B. BIICKNALL ESTCOITRT,
Adjutant-General.

Enclosure 5.
NOMINAL RETURN OF NON-COMMISSIONED
OFFICERS AND PRIVATES WOUNDED FROM
THE 4ra TO 6nt MAY, 1855, INCLUSIVE.
WOUNDED.
MAY 4.
30th Regiment of Foot.
Serjeant Thomas Delaney, severely.
41st Regiment of Foot.
Private John Williams, slightly.
89th Regiment of Foot.
Private Robert Steele, dangerously.
90th Regiment of Foot.
Private Andrew Toomey, severely.
Private Thomas Brennan, dangerously.
MAY 5.
2d Battalion Rifle Brigade.
Private David Buchanan, slightly.
23d Regiment of Foot.
Private Thomas Lnnt, slightly.
Private David Jones, severely.
Private William Brown, dangerously.
30th Regiment of Foot.
Lance Corporal Alex. Boreland, severely.
Lance Corporal James Pollard, severely.
Private James Martin, slightly.
34th Regiment of Foot.
Private John Day, severely.
41st Regiment of Foot.
Serjeant Daniel Ford, severely
Private Patrick Mars, severely
Private Thomas Woodrough, dangerously, since
dead.
Private William Wormington, slightly.
49th Regiment of Foot.
Corporal Martin Connolly, severely.
Private Frederick Courtenay, severely.
Private Peter Farquhar, severely.
Private Wiliam James, severely.
Private Patrick Doyle, severely.
Private John Cavanagh, severely.
. Private Jual Linahan, severely.
Private James Gormanly, severely.
Private Denis Linahan, slightly.
Private John Kelly, slightly.
Private James M'Niel, slightly.
Private Michael Rogers, slightly.
Private Thomas Treasey, slightly.
Private John Mulvany,
57th Regiment of Foot.
Private Patrick Barry, slightly.
9 •th Regiment of Foot.
Private William Johnson, slightly.
MAY 6.
7th Regiment of Foot,
Private Da‘iil Norman, severely.
Private Philip Guest, severely.
49th Regiment of Foot.
Private John Edwards, severely.
2d Battalion Rifle Brigade.
Private Arthur French, slightly.
J. B. BUCKNALL ESTCOURT,
Adjutant-General.

Enclosure 6.

NOMINAL RETURN OF NON-COMMISSIONED
OFFICERS AND PRIVATES MI ,SING FROM
THE 4TH TO 6TH MAY, 1855, INCLUSIVE.

MISSING.
MAY 5.
30th Regiment of Foot.
Private Patrick Driscoll.
MAY 6.
49th Regiment of Foot.
Serjeant James Robinson.
Private Patrick Bannon.
J. B. BUCKNALL E3TCOURT,
Adjutant-General.

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS.

( From the Times of this day. )
Mr. Milner Gibson's motion, which be is to submit to
the House of Commons this evening, has at any rate the
merit that it raises broadly and beddly the question in
lebate, and demands from the house ao opiMon whether
p inn the ministers were justified in breaking off liegotia-
ticr upon the terms conceded by Russia. Many, no
doubt, will vote against this motion, who are nit un-
compromising advocates of war; but few, vie think, can
support it who are not prepared fur any peace at any
price of dishonour or discredit. We shall still need tur-
her test to classify those whose names may appear in the
lajority ; but the minority, at any rate, we shall ki ow
be persons who, if not theoretical members of the
eac (-Society, are at any rate- prepared to give us full
ractical extension to its doctrines as any of that respec-
able deputation which lately bowed the knee before the
genius of war and discord embodied in' the gigantic form
of the late ambitious Czar. Every one who shall go
into the lobby with Mr. Gibson will, to our thinking,
erase himself for ever from the list of practical statesmen,
and add another to that numerous class of people, the
wanderings of whose heads we are in the habit of par-
doning
landes ofamiable,
tthis
rude b usleytaegl
newuoatdtd:hsti
irtraaesterttahpslisyittlanewehunfit forori theworld.
Hadconflicts
th the
donin,g on account of the excellence of their hearts—
agnododstmruegn
such
isuvltstacevuiineitel
gi:befgdeeplertunot whethernopitnoaeserkfittienienore,ndi n
ahttinoaot
ddawsal
tnaati
rfeboel
of the
ewetaahhcroee:
uwswinui Sebastopoleneptnspehtorsor
uut rteni eodd--
produce. Many, doubtless, perhaps a majority of
the House of Commons, would even then have
thonght that a peace obtained' at such a moment
comd neither be durable nor h.,nourable, and that
it was better to trust to the fortune of war than to
expose ourselves to the certain evils of a
pacification
patched up at so untoward a moment. Had the ques-
tion been whether a limitation of the Russian fleet was
a sufficient -execution of the third point, there might
possibly have been a majority to affirm that even this
paper bulwark against material aggression was a suffi;
cient vindication of the honour of the Allied Powers.
But when Mr. Gibson gravely propounds to us that the
assent of France, England, Austria, Turkey, and Rus-
sia to the principles of the four general articles which
had been proposed as the basis of the settlement of the
Eastern question afforded a reasonable expectation that
he recent negotiations might have bad a successful issue,
asks us to assert a fact which very few people indeed
in this country ever believed at the time, and the
rounds of which experience-has shown to be even more
utile than was then supposed. On what should such
reasonable expectation be grounded ? Not, certainly, on
the moderation of Russia, nor yet, we should hope, on
the anticipation, however well realised by the result,
that England was willing to consent to terms deroga-
tory to her position among the nations, and inconsistent
with the grounds on which she entered on the struggle
with Russia. The rea4onable expectation with which
the Congress was opened was not, we apprehend, that
it would lead to peace, but that, by exhausting every

means of pacification, by adopting every E.uggestion
which Austrian ingenuity could devise, we should I,v
very s.,a, t.) ourzeke., in tia a i
and war ally. ;zirl n)t peace,_ wai the icoAot,
able expeetati,n on which the V.enna Conferences were
founded. This hope, and not the hope (if peace, was
the excuse for entering into negotiations with an arro-
gant enemy not sufficiently humbled to listen to fair and
moderats terms.
But Mr. Gibson's resolutions fly over all these preli-
minary questions, and boldly assert that the propositions
which the Russian Envoy himself could hardly have
made with a grave countenance—propositions having
more the air of a dry diplomatic joke than a sober busi-
nesslike communication—really furnished elements upon
which peace could be negotiated and the rights of all
parties honourably and satisfactorily adjusted. No one,
we think, could consistently come to this conclusion
who is prepared to justify ever having engaged in the
war at all. If it was eght to draw the sword against
Russia to prevent her unjust invasion of Turkish terri-
tory, it could hardly be otherwise than ignominious to
withdraw from the attitude of protection, and leave the
country we had pretended to shield helpless, heartless,
and powerless, in the hands of its barbarian invader.
Those who thought the cause not worth an effort, the
prize not worth contending for, in the first instance—
and one of these Mr. Gibson certainly was—cannot be
expected to think it better worth struggling for now ;
but there are not a few, and among those we believe a
numerical majority of the present Government, led by
Lord John Russell, who, after having plunged us into
the present war with Russia, and succeeded in convinc-
ing the nation of its, justice and expediency, are now
eager for peace on whatever terms it can be oblained.
From this portion of the Cabinet the House of Com-
mons is, we think, bound to demand a specific and cate-
gorical explanation. There is no subject on which Par-
liament has a better right to inform itself, at a crisis
like the present, than the precise views and objects of
our Cabinet as to the war, and the terms on which that
war shall be concluded. On this point the country will
tolerate no reserve and no ambiguity. At this moment
the confidence necessarily reposed in Ministers is far
more ample and far more momentous than on ordinary
occasions. They have the power, even during the
sitting of Parliament, a power which they were very
nearly exercising a week or two ago, to make
an ignominious and disastrous peace, without the know-
ledge of the House of Commons or the nation. During
the recess their power is still more absolute. It is,
therefore, absolutely necessary for Parliament distinctly
to express its own opinions on peace and war, and as
distinctly to ascertain the opinions of all the leading
members of the Cabinet. No attempt on the part of
Ministers to answer Mr. Gibson's motion by taking pre-
liminary objections to the consideration of the question,
such as that it would interfere with negotiations now
pending, or that it is an invasion of the prerogative of
the Crown as to making peace or war, should be tole-
rated. The country must and will know whether those
whom it intrusts with place and power do or do not en-
tertain on this vital subject sentiments in unison with
its own. It will suffer no half-avows s, no official re-
ticences ' • will tolerate neither simulation nor dissimu-
lation. Lord Palmereon, Lord John Russel, and the
other leading members of the Government, must make
up-their minds to communicate their views with perfect
fradliness, and to stand or fall as those views shall or
shall not meet the sentiments of the House of Commons.
We have grown tolerant of differences of opinion among
our Ministers on minor points, but peace and war—such
a peace, and such a war—cannot possibly be allowed to
remain for a single day longer an open question in our
Cabinet.
(From the Morning Chronicle of this day.)
_

The issue to be raised in the debate tonight, on the
motion of Mr. Milner Gibson, is of far more importance
than might be inferred front the terms of the right
honourable gentleman's notice. He propose, by an
Address, to "inform her Majesty that the Louse of.
Commons has heard with much concern that a difference
between the Allied Powers and the Government of Rus-
sia, as to the precise mode of applying the principle of
the third article of those adopted as the basis of a settle-
ment of the Eastern questisio, has caused the Vienna
negotiations to be broken off." And the right honour-
able gentleman further calls on the House to express an
opinion, that the Russian propositions, for giving effect
to the principle of that third article, contain elements
fur renewed negotiation, and may offer the means for
obtsmitig an honourable and satisfactory peace.
al the surface these sug4esti ms seem reasonable
enough., They are not ill-suited to the temper of the
times, nor to the modes of reasoning which Mr. Milner
Gibson and his colleague, of the Manchester school have
striven to renderpopular among certain classes of the cons-
munity. That they embody fallacies, even treasons to
political common sense, is no reason why they should
not be put forward by the modern school of doctrinaires,
or accepted by persons whose pursuits, prejudices, or
interests preclude them from taking an enlarged view of
public affairs. In no respect do the Machiavellian
instincts .of Russian diplomacy appear rin re signally
than in the artfulness with which, throughout the late
negotiations, and from the very commencement of the
present dispute, covert appeals have been made to those
portions of the population of the Western Nations,
whose limited political experience and strong personal
interests might lead them to urge on their respective
Governments the advantages of peace. If statesmen of
standing, like Lord J bn Russell and M. Drouyn de
l'Huys, were deceived by these professions, it is no
Ehauie to the community at large that they ould, by
the leaders of the Manchester School, be deemed c
pable of a like delusidn. The scheme of the Russian policy
is to paralyse the efforts of the Governments of Franceand

England, by influencing public opinion, and thus sapping
the foundation of their strength. Mr. M. Gibson is either
the dupe or the unconsciou,stool of thosea•tute schemer,,
when he falls into the trap so cunningly laid for his am-
bition as a public man, or for his presumption as a poli-
tical thinker.
Upon the insincere use of language in Mr. Milner
Gibson's notice we have alreadycommented. At-Vienna
audacious cunning was arrayed against unsuspecting
honesty. Our unsuccessful negotiator permitted his
simplicity to be imposed upon, and the sagacious ex-
Minister of France even exceeded the represent4ltive of
his Sovereign's Ally, in his eagerness to become the vic-
tim of Russian perfidy. But at the present moment
there is no excuse for the men who seek to reenact the
degrading drama of the Conferences. Earl Grey, Mr.
Milner Gibson, and the other advocates of a dishonour-
able peace, bare before them'all the materials on which
a judgment can beformed ; aud they provoke a suspicion
of something more than mere blind infatuation, by the
pertinacity with which they seek to urge the country on
a career of shame and ruin.

•
As the House of Commons is at present constituted,
and when there is not in the Ministry a predominating
mind to control the various factions, it is important to
know what course the Conservatives are likely to take
on a motion of this kind. We can well comprehend
their enibarr issing p ,sition. It is not so long since they
were themselves angling for the support, not merely of
the fanatical advocates of a peace policy, but also of some
Statesmen who had played a distinguished part in public
affairs, and who were supposed to have relinquished
their direction because they sympathised with the ad-
vocates of peace in their object, though arriving at their
conclusions by a superior process. The Chiefs of the
Tory Opposition, therefore, may naturally feel some
difficulty in reconciling their past coquettings
with their present duties. As statesmen they see
the absurdity of Mr. Milner Gibson's propositions. As
party leaders, they are mortified at being compelled to
forego so tempting an opporhnity to displace an inca-
pable Administration.

We can imagine those gentlemen believing, or pro-
fessing to believe, in the sincerity of Russia. They may
choose to regard the "proposals of Russia as more es-
sentially conservative and mire durably pacific" than
the conditions stipulated fur by the Allies. They may
adopt, to serve the purpose of the moment, the loo'e
and slippery language of Russian diplomacy, and, by the
host vulgar manoeuvres of the /tit of fallacy, joggle with
truth and common sense. They may choose to wear
the livery of the Nesseirodes and Gortschakoffs, and
strive to hide their shame under the swaggering impu-,
dence of conscienceless dexterity and heartless logic.
We should not be surprised if men, pretending to the
direction of the aflairs of this country, should prove
themselves capable of so for abetting the policy of the
enemy as to cover with the mantle of their political re-
spectability the daring duplicities which seem to have
deceived the English and French Envoys at Vienna.
These are the consequences of a habit of profligate
manceuvring, but they bring after them speedy
retribution.

Yet, whatever their inclination, the Tories dare not
directly arid openly abet the dangerous infatuation of
the men of the Manchester School. They well know
that as, although the individual occupant of the throne
dies, "the King lives," so the general foreign policy of
the country must be consistently maintained, whatever
Ministry may inherit power. Therefore they could not
openly abet the methodic madness of Mr. Milner Gib-
son and his friends ; and those who have expected them
to do so are reckoning with a very imperfect knowledge
of, the nature and working of our political system.
The chiefs of the Opposition for the tune being Are
always impressed with the relprinsibilites of future office.
More especially on subjects affecting our foreign rela-
tions, they never can permit themselves to take a course
which might compromise their subsequent position as
Ministers of the Crown.

Divested, then, of any extraneous inter3st derivable
from possible party conflict, the notice of motion given
by Mr. Milner Gibson rests on its own palpable and
ostentatious demerits. The issue it raises directly affects
the honour, even the political exi,tence, of this country.
Tile immediate effect of its announcement has been to
raise the hopes of the Russian Marty in the various Con-
tinental States to the highest pitch. Ignorant of the
decayed importance of the Manchester school of politi-
cians, they have accepted this movement on their part
as an indication of English feeling—as the first step to-
wards an ignominious surrender. Mr. Milner Gibson
and his friends are too astute nut to know the specific
mischievousness of their propositions, though they have
not enough public virtue to abstain from urging them,
They are doubtless well aware that the issue they desire
to raise is not confined to the mere question of the de- 1
gree of skill exhibited by our diplomatists at Vienna, but
that it embraces the whole question of peace or war. I
Their cold-blooded indifferehce to all but the mere logic
of their confined and dogmatic creed is as inexplicable
on:any hypothesis consistent with patriotism, as is the
kindred cunning of the Muscovites with European ideas
of political moraliiy. The Allies have exhausted alike
concession and courtesy in their negotiations with the
enemy. They have-sounded the depths of his profes.
sions, and have laid bare .his ultimate purpose—con-
quest at any price. Let us hope it will be distinctly
understood that no party considerations are involved
in the discussion of this evening. Those who most dis-
a:prove of the conduct of the present Government are
irund to postpone their discontent to a consideration of
the great interests of the nation,

!SPORTING INTELLIGENCE.

P.1.:0G- U.l AIME 014 ME ET),,or '-1-4. \r" -1 —:... L-I ..,4 , .
To MORROW.-THE WOOpCOTE.
Tic Craven Stakes of 5 sovs each, with 30 added ; for
3-yr-olds, 7st lib ; four, Bst 71b ; five, Bst 1 3lb ; six
and aged, 9st ; mares allowed 51b, and geldings 31b.
Last mile and a quarter of the New Derby Course.
Age. I Age.
-
The Chicken
Claret
Ellermire 3
The Horton Stakes of 5 sovs each, with 30 added ; two-
yr-olds, 6st 31b ; three, Bst 61b • four, 9st 71b ' • five,
t,ix, and aged, 9st 121 b ; mares allowed 51b, and geld -
ings 31b. The winner to be sold for 1501., allowances
if entered to be sold for less. New T.Y.C., three-
quarters of a mile. . . '

_
Age. I Age.
Merry Monk (401.), 4 I Lord Raglan (401.) 2
Usurer (401.)
Rosy Morn (1501.) 3 I Sextus (401.)
Bordeaux (401.)
The Manor Plate of 100 soya (Handicap) for all ages';
the winner of any race after the publication of the
weights. (matches excepted), slb extra. Any number
of horst s the property of the same owner may run for
this plate. One mile.

Age st lb
Cranbourne
Sicily
Charlemont
Humguffin 4 6 11
Singapore
General Picton 3 6 9
The Archer
Fvlbeck 3 6 8
Catastrophe
Evangeline
Gundoline
Katerfelto 3 6 0
Professor Airey 3 5 10 ,
C by The Libel,
out of Splitvote 3 5 10
Mary Ann 3 5 8
Vlaid of the Morn 2 .5 0
Airs. Rigby
sous, for all ages ; two-yr-
.t 1013 ; four, and upwards,
;lb, geldings 31b. Any num-
' of the same owner may run
Le.

Age st lb
Orinoco
Eulogist 5 8 5
Hesse Cassel 4 8 3
Fact
hider 5 7 11
The Assayer 4 7 10
Gamekeeper
Gossip ... 5 7 9
Patience
Roebuck
Gr m by Confede-
rate, out of Miss
Shirley's darn
Brother to Grey
Tommy
Master Slender 6 7 5
Little Toro 5 7 4
Cat-paw 5 7 4
The Tleathcote Plate of 50
olds, sst 12Ib ; three, 7-
Bst 71b ; mares allowed 5
her of horses the property
for this plate. Half a mil
Age
B f by Pyrrhus the First
out of Miss Whip 3
Spinaway
C by Thistlewhipper, out
of lone
Michaelmas Maid 5
Comfort 4
Octavia
Humboldt
King of Trumps 6
The Woodcote Stakes of 10 soya each, with 100 adde
-for two-yr-olds, colts, 84 7th ; and fillies, Bst 4
The owner of the second horse to receive 25 sovs
of the stakes. New T.Y.C., three-quarters of ami
Thirty-seven subs.
Mark Foulis
Sirocco
Vandermulin
Bast
b c by Pyrrhus the First,
out of Monge's dam
b c by Pyrrhus the First,
(dam foaled in 1839) sis-
ter to Driffield
Jenny
Prince of Grange
Maid of the Morn
ch c by The Libel, out of
Jet
b f by Surplice, out of
Marietta
b c by Chatham, out of
Henrietta
Illuminator
Emigrant
na c by lago, out of Lady
Lawn
The Middy
Spindle
JFhe Epsom Summer Handicap of 10 soya each, 5 ft, and
2 only if declared, &c., with 10p added. The winner
of any race (matches excepted) after publication of the
weights, sib extra ; the owner of the second horse to
save his stake. One mile and a quarter. 40 subs.
Age st lb Age st lb
The Nabob
Hermit
Vanderdecken ... 5 7 8 Courtenay 3 5 7
Hercules
Haw 5 7 1 Red Rose
Mr. Sykes 46 9 Hartley Buck 35 1
incubus 4 6 2 Moonshine 3 4 13
Veteran 5 5 11 Moorcock . 3 4 11
Topsy 4 5 10 Defiance.., paid.
WEDNESDAY -The DEBBY.

Age
Br c by Faugb-a-Ballagh,
out of Emulous 2

Lizzie 4
Bro to Little Harry 3
Ida 3
Hambleton ... 2
Cleopatra
Scherz
B f by Verulam, out of
Calista

Minim
Wrotham
Heart of Oak
Early Morn ,
The Ringdropper
The Knight of St. Patrick
Warlock
Elfrida
Lunelle
Skyscraper
Woodcock
Turk
Secretary
b f by Slane, out of Nina
c by Dan Juan, out of My
Dear
brother to Orinoco
Sauve qoi peat
f by the Flying Dutchman,
out of Tamerlane's d
Lawn
Wyndham's br f by Bay
Middleton, out of Horn-
pipe

Rene mal of the Derby Stakes of 50 sovs each, h ft, for
3-yr-olds ; colts Bst 71b, and fillies Bst 21b. The owner
of the second horse to receive 100 soy, out of the
stakes. The last mile and a half of the New Course.
191 subs.

PROBABLE STARTERS.
HORSES. JOCKEYS.
De Clare
' Lord of the Isles
Rifleman
Wild Dayrell
Kingstown A. Day.
Dirk Hatteraick Marlow.
Pharos
Garet
Rylstone O. Oates.
Lord Alfred r . . .. J. Osborne.
Monge
The Bisnn
The Cropper
Fiatterer
Strood ,
Courtenay
The Carew Stakes of 5 sovs each, with 30 added ; two
yr-olds, fist 31b ; three, Set 61b ; four, 9st 71b.5 five and
upwards, 9st 121 h ; mares allowed 51b, and gelding,
31b. New T.Y.C. Three-quarters of a mile.

Sly.

Age
Eliermire 3
King of Trumps 6
The Epsom Town' Plate of
ages ; the winner of any _
publication of the weights,
horses the property of the
this plate. One mile.
Age st lb
Orinoco
Eulogist 5 8 4
Vanderdecken 5 8 3
Cock Pheasant 5 7 12
Speed the Plough 5 7 12
Wilsford 4 7 11
Warwick a 7 9
Inder• 5 7 9
Roebuck 4 7 8
Wellsbourne (h b) 6 7 5
Testy
Humguffin 4 6 13
Cat's-paw
Foxhunter 4 6 131
The Great Exhibition Plate of 100 soya (Handicap), for
all ales ; the winner of any race, except matches, after
publication of the weights, 516 extra ; any number of
horses, the property of the same owner, may run for
this plate. One mile and a quarter.
Age
,st lb Age at lb
Lascelles
Vanderdecken
Eulogist 5 7 4 Brother to Grey
The Assayer - 7 0 Tommy 5 6 2
Caliph ........ 4 6 12 Tom Burke
Gamekeeper
Inder. 5 6 6 Katerfelto
Master Slender ... 6 6 4 Defiance drawn
The Epsom Cup of 100 soup, added to a Sweepstakes of
10 soya each, h ft; for 3-yr-olds, 7st ; four, Bst 7113 ;
five and upwards, 9st • mares allowed 51b, and geld•
ings 31b. To be run after the Derby, and any horse
having run in that race without being placed allowed
31b. Derby Course. 15 subs.

I Tiro to Little Harry 3
I Lambswool 3
50 sovs (Handicap), for all
•ace (matches excepted) after
, 51b extra. Any number of
) same owner may rata fot

Age
Nabob .•....
Acrobat
Jack Sheppard
Andover
King of Trumps
Virago
Scythian
Pantheon
The Durdans Stakes of 5
two-yr-olds, Est 121 b ; thr
five and upwards, 9st 8
geldings 3lb ; the winner
acces if entered to be sold

Age st rb
Toholski 5 6 13
Duke of Lancaster 4 6 10
Winter 5 6 10
Ch c byPantaloon,
out of Physalis 4 6 8
.TitormllB 3 6 7
Lady Alicia 3 6 5
Kettleby., 3 6 2
Omer Pacha 3 6 0
Matilda 3 5 13
Englemere 3 5 12
St. Julian
Professor Airey 3 5 10

Age
Epaminondas
.
Scherz
Knight of SL George 4
Hermit 4
Ore-tes 5
Ratl.olan
Dr. Cooke

... 6

sous each, with 30 added ;
•ee, Bst 101 b ; four, 9st 71b ;
lb ; mares allowed 51b, and
to be sold for 1501. ; allow-
( for less. Half a mile.

Fby ThistlewhipperAge Age Fair Jean (401.) .. 2
out of Herculaneum Spinaway (401.)
(40/.) .................... 2 .F by Verulam, out of
Usurer (401.)
Nestor (40/.) • 5 Tha Novice (401.)
THURSDAY.—THE TWO-YR OLD STAKES.
The Epsorn Four yr-Old Stakes of 50 sovs each, h ft ;
for colts, Bst 111 b ; and fillies, Bst 61b. New Derby
Course.
Pelham I Bmby I Tom I Marc Antony
Her Majesty's Plate of 100 guineas, for mares only ;
three-yr-olds, 7st; four, Bst 9lb ; fire, 9st 21b ; six and
• aged, 9st 51b. Great Metropolitan Stakes Course, two
miles and a quarter, to start at the winning chair.—To
close and name to the Clerk of the Course, on the Mon-
day before the races, by six o'clock p.m.
The Two-yr old Stakes of 10 soya each, with 50 added ;
col' , Bst 71b ; fillies, Bst 41b. Any winner before
starting to early 51b extra. Half a mile. 21 subs.
Lyd brook. Bubble.
Bravery. Frenzy. •
Sirocco. f by Orlando, out of Plash.
E'oquence. c by Epirus, out of Wedlock
Lady Florence. Missenden.
• c by. Bay Middleton, out of b c by Don john, out of
Slander. My Dear.
b c by Pyrrhus the First, Br to Orinoco.
out of sister to Driffield. Sugarcane.
The Daring Ranger. Scalade.
Overreach. Moiesty.
Fracas. Jane Shore.
The Grand Stand Plate of 100 soya, added to a Handi'