The National Register.
London, England, 1814-07-03 00:00:00

MONTIILY AGRICULTURAL REPORT.

Swedish and the trw yellow Scott,ls turnips which are sown have I.
twen well got is. The common turnip culture proceeding with ac-
tivitv. The putatoe crop luxuriant anti forward, and contrary to
former opinion, an equal breadth with last year planted. Grass
very liJit upon poor lands : on superior soils heavy, and improving
tinder the present rains. Very little yet cut, and that chit fly near
the metropolis. Tares, rapes, &e. a most Imturiant crop, and chives.
very good. The sprig torn looks well, and as yet healthy : but
tile long continuance of the easterly winds, the alterations since,
and watt of the solar heat, have retarded thfe progress towards ma-
turity, and, as tar as at present can be judged, the harvest must lie
late; and sin the cool weather continue, there must be considera-
ble tit feet both in the quantity :mil quality of the grain. The
process of flowering has not yet ceneneneed on the wheats, even of
the best of soils, A very heavy interest depends on the success of
that pro ess. The pea crop wars a very indifferent appearance from
i's extra me back wardne-s. Of hops HO particular report. The
• fruit received an early blight, ac in last year, and it is to be fbared
that 611CCeliSiOil of warm sun, so absolutely necess..ry to its recovery,
will not come in time. The quantity iJ spring wheat sown this
season minsintLy small, but the breadth of the wheat crop in general
firon the most exten,tve scale ; and if productive, its quantity will, in
all probability, eonsidetaliy overtop the animal consumption of this
country, from which, and other considerations, the. exportation Bill
is wise and judicious. In wool no alteration,
Cattle markets universally heavy, and the dealers fully aware oft}
still farther and considerable decline. Mulch cows fetch a fair
price.

LAIV INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF KING's BENCH.-SATVI2DAY.

BANFIp,I) v. MILLAR.
This was an action to reeve,. 951. 10s. for goods sold and de-
ercd. The plaintiff wa• a broiler, anti the demand was for
goods famished by him to the detentiant's credit. The defence set
up was that 11,1:e goods were not furnished (to Mr. Millar, but to u.
person named .Cullier. brother to Mrs. MWar, house they
were ddixered with the exception of two
.of the articles. It ap-
p;!ared however that Mr. Millar gave the ,order for the goods, awl
sdected them.; on one occasion when a .pair of witclow•
curtain: wt•r.e.nut sent house at the time promised, 11ir,. pillar threat-
coed ir they we,re.not soltite.next day all the goods sh,wild be re-
turned and ac wut:!o ppyfor none,of.theiii. Verdict fuy..tbe

SIR (:. P. rfURNER, ;BART V. STROLING.
w 3-: an avtion of 'Frover 40 .11W.G vet. a piettire frame, winfler
the tollo<At:12: eiretunitanees nue aLt:o Sit Gregory too a
Fancy to a pirtore painted by the defendant. the t•ubjeet of „tv.11:1:11
mas, 1)3:Iia and matte proposAis to 111e1t4se
it. 'rile price whi.ch tl.e defendant demanded 1.1. Vat?
.f2OOO r Gref,ol'yj lwv:est‘r; _ultimately atvectl to gi.v
1,Y.)01. for it. At this tinse it will in :at elo,:ant gilt franie, hitt
5(.14;4t• time at ter, t% hey sent home, it \vie; nit a rolkr, w,th
no fr:uuc
tit 311. Application was
spnvie to the defendant for the frame, t,at
without •ateeess ; and the pre,ent action was brow:lit to ceeover the
frAine Of it, value. It t,Vilti WI kV Prikiiiol 414 iii. (lit' it,..!Ce*:ll.l':lt %Vit., 101
pictute anti frame, i4n:l.ttlat v6hte .the ft ante w 4;
,gtut.e4,. ; for which stint a yet dict was ta}cep tor the

COLT:r nF ENVIIM4LTER.—SAIUIWAY
THE •h 1 V. fIEGVINING.
dcfcr.dint in tni• eaw. (h owner of a sal ti:vzling vesiret,
Thu convietel in the lit:nalty of ioUW. for having c0n-
.04.