The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1820-10-13 00:00:00

In giving your ra a•osts why you dial mot think it degrading
to the station of her Royal Highness to have • male si4i.
'nestle sleeping is the teest with her, I flout' you said that
there was tie mystery i• the ca,e, at the commusiestiou by
the hatchways to the tent were always open; you have said
that our night is attempting to go up the hatchway you
found the tent cloyed, did you think there Wllll auy mystery
in that? The teat brie( rioted, I supposed her Royal High-
ness retired to real; I did nut think there was any mystery
is that.
IYas Bergami is the tent at that period? I did not see
him—l do no. know, amid I cannot tell.
Do you know that he was not is the tent Ido not.
I shirk the witweas has already spoken to Bergami's sleep-
ing in the teat--(Sesarst Peers cried " No! No! be bead
it, sad ha &litres it.")
You have already said you had beard, mad you believed,
that Bergami slept is the tint ; have you any reform in be-
have ►e was nut in the tent when you found it closed ? I
thought about it ; I thought uothimg of it.
You have before said you sever IT/flllll.lllell to her Royal
Highness that you ilanesilst it necessary foe a male dosmestat
to sleep *ear her us deck ? Yes.
Consequently you could not be the recommender of that
meaauae; did you thick it necessary fur • male domestic to
sleep withis the trot? 1 never represented either the one
ur the other.
The witness has, however, said, he thought it necessary
that • male domestic should sleep sear her Royal Highness
on 4 ck—did be think it necessary that he should sleep with.
is the lest ? I never thought of the thing at all. Probably
if I ►ad seen so person in the tent I should have taken as
little notice of it, as whew l observed some person to be
there I said soiling of it.
Was it for the Princess's saf ly you thought it necesssry
that • male domestic should sleep near her % Ile► Royal
Hiatuses, thought so; and I did not think okra wise.
The wittiest has *heady lamed, that in his opinion it was
Necessary, hut that he did nut oumeissauicate that opinion to
bar Royal Highness the Princess al Wales, but in In. last
answer tt appears as if the PriurLas of Wales had comm/-
ideated it to him; did the Pciseess of Wale in fact cum-
inuteicate it to the witness % She did out us that occasion,
except after the business at Gcnua she 'sever partueulaely
mentioned it.
What was the danger to he apprehrsaleil on board the po-
!acre ? Ido nut know (Alloy immediate dative.
Times the attendance you thought requisite fur the Prin.
eess of Wales, of a male domestic ►teeping mar her Royal
Higher's, was slut from the apprelnssion of any danger'—
Sir. Brougham interposed and said, the witness had nut
staled that no danger was appreheutleJ, but that he himself
kites, of no immediate danger.
Was there soy danger ? Ido nut kasw of any immediate
danger ; nut personal danger: if I bad thouslit that, I ►hould
nut have bees easy myself is @leering below.
Was there any dimger, such as would have induced sou at
any time to recommend that a sour _datnestic should sleep
iu the tent? I nyseeellifirriUmmetoll st.
By Lord Gratifies—Yon have said that at Carlsruhe the
Primers, dined at the Grand Duke's a xrept one day, when
she dined at the Margiavine's; did you dine wills her at
those place? Yes.
You have also said that sliesuppeil at the Court, or at the
Margravine'• ; what is the hour of dingier at that Court?
do not recollect the hour sufficiently to he able to maak it.
Have you any recollection of the lateness of the hour of
the supper amid evening parties there ? I can't say; it was
late; I should think past twelve.
Can you say whether her Royal Highness hail time to re-
tees home between atheistr and ampper,eillier whets they were
at the same house Of when she dined at use anal supped at
the other? I should imagine she might.
Did she, to your knowledge, return home between dinner
aid supper o• either of those days? Idu out recollect that
she did.
Will you undertake to say that ►he did nut return home
on auy of those occasions? I will undertake to say that I
du nut recollect it. If I had the smallest recollection of it I
would have nu hesitation in stating it.
ttzeinsimmi 6N Lord Darlington—l will tall the witness's
rceulketien to the time Bergami, Camera, sad Throaluse
took have of her Majesty on hoard the polacre. He has
said, that when they took leave of her Royal Highness they
each kissed bre baud. I would ask, whether he knows that
Bergami dud sot take leave of her R•syal Highsesa Infuse
coming on sleek? Ido nut hamar ; I have nut au idea of it.
Did you see those there persons come upu• desk together?
They were all us deck tugellser.
What! Bergami, Theodore, and Camera? All on deck.
Did the Princess come im deck whets you were all there ?
I do nut recollect that the Princess was below.
Did you ever see Bergami take leave of her Royal Higlu
seas us any occasions except that you have just mentioned
of Camera, Theodore, or any tuber Fermin of her suite ? I
have sees him take leave merciless user, mod l have
sees may thing else bet kissing her hand as every body else
did.
Now, Sir, during the coarse of your very Wag easmisa.
lieu, you have frequently mentioned her Royal Highness
sleeping oa board the pulacra, seder the test—whew you
►ave usestionial her alerpiag is that test, 1 appeelascad yew
watt that she rating repaacd ua the sofa, tins slops, is the