The Sun.
London, England, 1855-08-03 00:00:00

were no improvement on the men whom they had super-
seded.
Colonel DIJNNE also criticised unfavourably the new
arrangements, especially the thrusting of civilians into so

many departments.
Mr. WILLIAMS lamented that the new changes had
not resulted in greater economy.
Mr. LIONSELL replied, defending the new system and
tilt, appointments made under it.
After some further conversation the vote was agreed to,
as were the supplementary estimate•.
On the vote of 15,0U01. for a building to exhibit scientific
models, &c., at Kensington Gore,
Mr. SPOONER opposed the vote, as he was quite cer-
tain that this was but the beginning of an expenditure
which no one at present contemplated.

Mr. GLA.DSTONE defended the vote on the ground
that there were various collections of scientific models
_ _

and objects of art which there were no meansofailaiting
to advantage. The land belonged to the Government; the
building, when erected, would be complete in itself, and
would require no further additions • for it must not be
forgotten that this was no part of die plan of permanent.
buildings with which it was proposed some time ago to
cover Kensington Gore.
Mr. DISRAELI also supported the vote, and said that
various interesting collections had been withheld from the
country simply on the ground that there was no place ade-
quately to exhibit them.
Mr. BRIGHT opposed the vote, which he was sure
would only prove to be the forerunner of a similar vote

. _
for the next fifty years.
Mr. FOX could only hope that Mr. Bright's prediction
would prove true, and that the increase of collectiobs would
necessitate the annual expenditure of a sum like this. At
the same time he was satisfied that this vote would not
involve us in'additional expenditure.
After some further conversation the committee divided,
when the vote was agreed to by a majority of 85 to 33.
The house then resumed.
CHARITABLE TRUSTS BILL.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said he trusted the house

v:clid allowthis bill to be read a second time, and consent
to take the debate on its principle on the motion for going

into committee.

Mr. KNIGHT objected to many parts of the bill, which
at the present period of the session could not be fairly dis-
cussed. The better course would be to refer it to a seleot

committee.

Sir G. GREY said that every portion of the bill might
be folly discussed on the next stage.
Mr. DISRAELI did not think that a bill of so much im-
portance ought to pass its second and most important stage
without discussion.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said the bill was nothing
snore than a supplemental bill to one the working of which
had been most beneficial.
Mr. MALINS concurred in the objection of the right
hon. member for Buckinghamshire, but recommended the
house to read the bill a second time.
Mr. MASTERMAN trusted the bill would not be pressed
further during the present session.
Lord PALMERSTON expressed a hope that the house
would consent to the second reading of the bill, reserving
the discussion on its merits to the next stage, when there

would be ample time for its full and mature consideration.
Sir W. JOLLIFFE said, if the house legislated at all,
it ought to legislate satisfactorily, but it was impossiqe to
do so at this late period of tho session. He thought it
would be much better to postpone the further considera-
tion of the measure until next session.
The bill was then read a second time, and was ordered
to be committed on Monday, at six o'clock.