The Sun.
London, England, 1855-05-10 00:00:00

•our.e, tie the) Thc .or-lo4eroent la regard to
ine arts was initial., the only ditfcret.ce heiug that the
4-overnment undertook, in the latter cni., all risk of
:onveya,,ce. In reference to industrial articles the risk
,vas undertaken by the exhibitors.
VICTO RIA. PARK.

In reply to Mr. BUTLER,
Sir W. MOLES WORTH Faid the Gnvernment nsu-
Lily, in cases Of public parks, purchased more land than
vas required for the area of the park, and that had been
lone in the case of Victoria as well as the other parks.
THE ALDERSHOT ENCAMPMENT.

In reply to Mr. BELLEW, _
Mr. PEEL said it was not intended to keep the
troops in huts at Aldershot during the winter, but pre-
Aarations were being made to procure houses as barracks
(or them.
LORD DUNDONALD'S PLANS.

In renly to Mr. FRENCH,
Lord PALMERSTON said the subject of Lord Dun-
onald's plans was at present under the consideration
if scientific men, but he thought it advisable not to enter
alto the subject at present.
In reply to Sir J. PAKINGTON,
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said with respect to
Church discipline, which at present was a subject of
.rest reproach, a bill on that subject was prepared by
or at least under his direction, at the same
tone as the Testamentary Jurisdiction Bill. When the
oil' was introduced it had not been submitted to the Go-
vernment. It had since been submitted to them, and
,hey thought it right that the opinion of the right rev.
Telates should be had on it. It had been submitted to
them accordingly, and they had not yet returned it; but
'le could state the bill was prepared on the principle of
',Feating the churches of England and Ireland as one
Church, and be was not aware of any other legal prin-
ciple on which it could be framed. (Hear, hear.) With
regard to the time for the introduction of the bill, the
house would see it was impossible for him to say when
it could be brought in. It could not be brought in be-
lore the second reading of the Testamentary Jurisdic-
tion Bill, seeing they were in the middle of an adjourned
debate on that bill. But he hoped it would be brought in
before the third reading of the latter bill. The Government
had not the slightest intention of abandoning the Tes-
tamentary Jurisdiction Bill. It was impossible they
could have the second reading of that bill to-morrow,
but certainly they should have it on the first opportunity
when the more pressing business of Government would
allow. (Hear.) With regard to the Matrimonial Di-
vorce 8,11, it had been prepared in time for the second
reading of the Testamentary Jurisdiction Bill, but the
same causes that delayed the other bills operated also
with regard to it. (Hear.)

THE CANDIA TRANSPORT.
Mr. MOODY asked the Under-Secretary for War
the eause of the detention of the Candia, and whether
demurrage was to be paid, and, if any, to what amount
per day, and from what date for such detention ; also,
whether any special report as to her sea-worthiness had
been recently made, that the lives of those sent out in
her might not he endangered.
Mr. F. PEEL said that, according to the information
he had received, the detention of the vessel was caused
by an opinion expressed by the officers at Woolwich un-
favourable to the manner in which she had been fitted
up. In consequence of that opinion, the members of
~he transport board inspected the vessel, and satisfit d
themselves that there was no ground for apprehensien
on that score, and accordingly the vessel had proceeded
sea, after a detention of four or five days only. No
lemurrage had been paid, as the vessel was a hired one.