The National Register.
London, England, 1822-11-25 00:00:00

CRIMINAL INFORMATION.—THE KING o. NOEL.

Mr.l4;riettnioved for leave to tile a criminal information
against • military officer, named Neel, residing in the West
Riding of the county of York, for sending • threatening Letter,
with • view to provoke Mr. Wilson, a gentiewa• of the same
district, to fight • duel.
It appeared, by the affidavit of Mr. Wilson, that some roe-
raspondence had taken plane between himself and Mr. Noel,
o• the subject of sporting on a manor and certain inclosures.—
Io of having beep w;roed off the manor by Mr,

oe".
_

Wilson's sorvuot, .Ir. Noel wrote to Mr. Wilson, threaten.
lug to insult him wherever they 'MAU meet.
•
Time Court granted mrule to stew e3uic.
DOP, DEMISE OF HOWARD, V. TAILOR.
Mr. Stocks said this case had been before Ihe Court en a
former to:coition. when the parties were in sited to come to so
agreement. All eu.leavours to bring thrum to on agreement
had ',noted useless, and the Court was again c%lied Non' to
decide.

Justice Be t read the report. The cause was tried at the
spring assizes, Cambridge, before the Chief Baron. It was an
actidex of ejectment, to obtain posses.don of premises held by
the defendant in the county of Cambridge. 't he Jury found
Verdict fur tile plainiill. The L ssor of the plaintiff claimed
session, as shaignee of a mortgage deed executed in 1747. ine
. .

101111 of 1201. was paid for the- property mortgaged. Mr. Wel.
hinson had moved for • rule to shew cause why the verdict
should not he confined to premises only situate in Milton. The
spplicatinn was made upon the ground that the lessor of the
plaiatili had taken more land under his mortgage tha• he was•
entitled to stains. It was urged as a very bard case, inasmuch
as the defendant's fancily, who resisted the plaintiff upon a deed
executed in the year 1740, were not prepared to prove at the
trial the precise quantity of land which came within the deed
assigned to the plaintiff. They were guilty of au oversight in
that respect, and the Court was mused either to storied the
verdict or grant a new trial.
Mr. Stocks, this day, opposed the application, and an affidavit
made by the Rev. Mr. ',Web, a trustee, under the plaintiff's
0, deed, was put in. The affidavit pr ed the payment of interest,
' under the deed, by the detention' - Hy.
• The Court, coder all the circuits§ .es, refused to grant a
new trial. _ _

WEDNESDAY. Noe. 19. k...
tits
The Court was engaged till near one o' clock ' hearing Mr.
Robinson and Mr. Marryatt on the notion for • trial in the
lithe cause of Butt •. Wiseman. Before one, tit JAM Chief
Justice left the court to sit at Guildhall, and the othar Judge*
took only orditeasy motions,and shortly rose. Nothiogbeaurred
of any interest to the public. It is still quite uncertain *ben
the case of the King a. Williams will be heard.
COL/Rl' OF COMMON PLEAS.

TUESDAY, NOV. 19.
ST. JOHN Y. SIR THOMAS CHAMUMETS, AND COVENTRY tr.
TUE SAME.

These important cases were this seaming decided. ► rule
was obtained some time back by Mr. Sergeant Lewes, to chew
cause why the annuity granted by the defendant, in consider.
ation of the sum of 9,0001. should not be set aside, and the
deed securing the suite cancelled, part of the consideration
money having been repaid—the address of the witnesses ut the
memmial not having been described—and the names of all the
parties beneficially interested not baying been named therein.
Mr. Ser_tant Peek followed on the same side.
Messrs. Sergeants Pell and Vaughan spoke against the rule
at some length, and
The Lord Chief Justice, in a luminous speech recapitulated
the whole of the ease. His Lordship concluded by sJying, that
neither justice nor law required the interference of this Court tai
set the annuity aside , and I suggest. said his Lordship, for the
consideration of Sir T. Champneys, whether it might not he
better to take until the nest Term to consider as to the other
case of Gordon, the third annuitant, is which Sir 'rimmed, who
wan present, seemed to acquiesce.
WELNIESDAY, NOV. 20.