The National Register.
London, England, 1812-06-28 00:00:00

WEDNESDAY, JUNE `=}•

Upon the motion for the third reading of- the Marvate Pier Bill,•
Lore REnkauAt t; pointed out one objectionable clause, w among
other things, provided, that all above a particular ape should nai• one
penny for permission to walk on the Pier. How', was the age to be
ascertained ? He moved that the clause be lett ot.t.
The Earl of Lto za root. sail, th it such an Ameadmcnt woud
yid the loss of the Bill. It was of great impiii !mice that d
pass, as the town of Margate was not secute without such a Pier._
The Amendment was then negatived, and the Bill was read a ;hi
time and passed.
A l-ng conversation ensued between the law Lords respecting
hearing of A ppeals, as a great number of them have now rrianned
unheard and undecided several years.
• Lord REDES D ALE expressed 3 ‘Visit !IC!: SOille steps might be tarn
to acc ilerate them, as great injury was done to the pai tie oy the r re.
mainimi, so extremely long sots rumen:.
The Lna.r CH tNc.ci.i.ort declared, that no man could perform the
archiOns dillies of the Law, and the business attached to tlkit House
its President, and satisfy the public and his ow i conseiente
dischargingthe weight that devolved on the shoulders of a lord Chan.
cellor, increased as that weight was by the important affairs that coat.
stantly pressed upon him, unless some alteration took pace as to the
manner in which the business of the Law Depa• tment and that of Pa.!'.
liamentary.concerns should be transacted Hereafter.
Here the conversation drooped, with an understanding, that Lord
Redesdale should bring in a Bill to expedite the judicial business.
Earl FITZWII.I.2 Au expressed his satisfaction, that the inquiry on
the Orders in Council had. in his opinion, been brought to a favoura'.-
ble issue. It was matter of congratulati in for hini,•that Mini,teri3
had renounced, it) this and other instances, the errors of their forum
policy. He shou'd not, th refare, feel it necessary to propose any
farther proceedings on this subject.
The Earl of I. iv La pone said, that reasons which had induced
nisters to give up these Orders were not necessary to be stated in thi.t
place, and at that time ; and he trusted, that this general repeal would
have the eact of bringing back the commerce between the•belligerents
to the old channel.
The Marquis of LA NsnowN E said, that every word of the Dectira-
. lion which the Prince Regent had ordered to be published, had his ill.
tire approbation ; but no part of the conduct of Ministers withal
them to praise or approbation—for they hid reduced his Noble Friend
(Fitzwilliarn) to bring the subject of the Orders in eoundir beforc the
House, -when they could have received all the infOrMation respect ng
them, ig,their own capacities as Ministers. However, if America
were not 'Satisfied with this absolute rev:lca:ion,. no one would he core
• reany to stand up for the ungoubted maritime rieht of this country
than he should. He concluded by Moving—" That an humble Ad.
dress be presented to the Prince Regent, that he would he pleased to
lay before the House a Copy of the Declaration revoking the Orders
'in Council."=-The motion was carded, xem. tits.—Adjourned.

THIORSDAY, JUNE J.
The Banbury Peerage Claim occupied the attention of their Lord-
ships at some length. . •
Lords F.r.t.F.Neeßouen, and Ei.nom, an:l the Duke of Noitrotx,
expressed a firm opinion.; that the present claimant had not In' 'e Plod
his right's to the title., Further proceedings were posti,:unc.l till
Thursday.
Earl ST Ari HOPE fixed the second reading of his Hill relative to Dis-
- for Friday the ad of July, and moved, that the Lords be sum-
moned for that day, which was ordered.—Adjourncd.

FRIDAY, juNt 26.
CURATES' BILL.
The Earl of HAaanwny stated, that in consequence of the rulop-
prehens:ons that prevailed in regard to the Curates' Bill, he was dis•
posed, though reluctantly, to give it up for the present Session.
an He
sh-ould propose sonic amendments on Wednesday or Thursday, d
the Bill might go out to the country as that of the proposer, merely
leaving such amendments as other Lords might suggest for considera-
tion next Se.: ion. It had nevt.tr been in contemplation to affect the
liOnzs of present incumbents.
After a ti:w words from the Archbishop of CANTERRIIRy, the
Bishop of LoNoosr' and Ike LORD CIIANCELLOR, Lord tiarrowl
proposal %vat, agreed to.— A djout ned .