The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1820-10-19 00:00:00

i tut, yes bow Yilstattsti was morsel is her Hoye
Highness's affairs' Yes.
Was Potasai thee engaged in Iser Royal Highness's af.
fairs ? Yes, her Miles affairs.
Ilad Potassi docunteeta in Isis pommies of her Royal
Highness? Yes. Ise kid; sod I took them to Yilrnarcati.
Did you mut, es int beaffnean, inform your master that
Yilrnarreli bed Valetta per fee.papets ? Ku. • .
Did you bet tldelt it your duty to do KO I thought 1
should do no hassled
Do you mean to my, you thought you shield do no harm
in giving documenet of bee loyal Wesson ? 1 only gave
letters, not documents.
• Do yton think it so biro to give letters of bee Royal
Iliglineu? Yes.
Did yam not think it your duty to communicate this to
your master ? I thought it was my duty, but I neglected
..—(44 tough.)
Who was the person who called upon you twice, request-
ing you to 1;4 to Yilisurcati? Ido nut know, if 1 did 1
'would mention it.
Where did you first see trim? In the street of San Jerome,
year the theatre.
Did you meet him by accident? Yes; 1 did not know
him.
Ifid you not ask his same, when he knew ynii were Po-
tarsi's servant' I asked bite, but he said it was no
busi-
uesa of mine to know it.
tWhere did you meet him again by accident on the second
day ? Where I met him 13. fur
Waq ii at the Slate how the seroad day? Yes.
1)14 he put the CIIVIC Ties to you the second day? De
•Aied me if 1 had thought of what he had told me tire day
fore.L.
What did yoe say? I said 1 bad thought of it, and would

not go.
Did you see kiwi again ? No, I went In Yilmarcati.
After telling hem you would not go Yes.
Did you a►k him his name on the second occasion? Yes;
Le ri fused to tell me.
Did he go will you to ? Yes, to the door.
Mee you seen the nsau siuce ? Yes, but nut his face.
Had you no curiosity to see his face? Yes.
Did you follow him to zrstify that curiosity ? Yes.
Where To the door of Yiluvwcati.
Had you ;sitters in your possession thee? N.,; on the
former dry I had, but Not then.
Did you see the mats after that? Once, but I did not see
Lis face.
Wag he a young or old man ? Middle-aged, I think.
Was he light ur dark ? Durk.
How was he dressed! I am not a painter to draw his
picture.—(A laugh.)
1111.11 WAS be dressed? Ido not remember the colour of
his coat.

Ilas body instructed you, al this bar, not to say, Non usi
ricordo! I have beard this Non mi ricordo about tow's,
and I asked whet it was.
Did Vassali tell you cot to say, Non mf ricordo! No.
Did any uue tell you not to say, Non se *uteri, instead
of Nun mi ricordo? No I knew it myself without teeing
Sold.
Did Vilmareati pay you for the papers on the first lime?
; be gave me three double Napoleons, and he told me
to get ebnculate.—(.4 largh.)
When did you take the second paper. ? After September.
Dow soon after you took the brat papers &I you lake the
second i Three ur four days.
What did he pity for the second parcel? Fuur single Na-
poleons.
Were you sent for ? No; I went of my own accord.
When did you carry the third parcel ? Iu October.
At what part of the month of October? 1 du not re-
member veto ther it was the beginning, the middle, or the rod.

West. you paid fur she third parcel ? lie paid me another
time.
II hen did you carry the fourth parcel to Vilmnrcati ?
carried him papers as far as the latter earl of November.
What I asked was, when you carried him the fourth parcel?
I LIJ out know precisely; it was us the latter end of the
month of October, or the It-limning of Novi ntlerr.
Did you carry many papers to Vliellafettil i They were
mot papers; they were letters.
Dad you ewe communicate to your master she circum-
stance of your Laving given those letters or papers to Ya-
rn treati ? I ',ever said any thing to him about them iu my
re.
You have said that you remained itt the service of Po-
int-ft until the month of July following. Dui Mg that time
did nut Putatti speak to you rotative to the papa rs Never.
You have said you were left in charge air these papers;
were you the confidential cleik of Potazzi ? I was.
Did Pittazsi never miss the impels ? Never.
Hid you mut think you were milli( a must infamous part
in delivering those papers lo Vilmareati ? Nut at she begin-
nine, I dad afterwards.
How long was it before this light broke in on your under-
MI. Oeama■ °birdied to the question, 54 it WO Desolating
that a light bad broke. in uu the uulkratandiug of the wit-
utt4.

The Solicitor-General said, be hail so objection to put the
question in a different shape.
When did you discover that your cowing-I was base and
infamous ? About the beginuing of the present year.—(.l
laugh )
I wish to know whether it was a discovery of your own, or
you were told so by some person or persons? Many per-
sons act basely and sofainously, and afterw suds repeat ; and
so have I.
ben you discovered your conduct to be base and infa-
mous, did you think it your duly to commuaieate it tu
Pu-
tessi ? I thought it better to be silent.
Having swore thug you considered your conduct base and
infamous' and that you atcrwards repented, did you not
think She best thing, as pail of that repeatatico, was to com-
municate to P.rtaszi what you bad dune? I could out fore-
see all these 'llium
Navin said that in the beginning of the year you had
repented, when did you carry she last bundle of papers to
Villosarrati ? I do not remember, it was She egad of Novem-
ber or the begissuing of December, in She last year.
Am I to understand that you never carried papers to him
after that lime?—
The Interpreter said that the witness requested lime to
consider before be could swear.
In the month of Judy, the persois whose name I do n.,t
know, called at my house, sod asked for a list of the witoesses
in favour of her Majesty, and I gave it to him.
What I want to know is, whether you called on Vilinarrati
in the mouth of July ? Yee, to tell him that this permit) bad
called. _ -

Was that the same person whom yon before met by acci-
dent iu she street, who bad then called upon you? No;
the best person who called upon me I don't know ; but the
person who came in July is kieanti•
Did you give any papers at lint time? I gave him the
list of persons.
Wu that by desire of Potazzi ! No.
Do you mean to say that was a list of witnesses who bed
sat out on behalf of her Royal Highness? They were nut
all witnesses. I did not give him a list of all witnesses.
Mr. Dr 11111•11 objected to this line of rxamiustion, as it
referred to a written paper which ()tight to be produced ; nod
as it was in the hand+ of liimarcati, his Learmil Filend
could of course produce it.
The Solicitor-General was satisfied with the exaniination,
so far as it had gone.
I understand you to say that you did not communicate
that list to the advocate PUNZZI ? I did not conituoti:cale
it to Milani.
Then basing repented of what you had done in January,
you afterwards in July delivered to Viltinrecti a list of wit-
iiesses coming on behalf of the Queen—is tint so Their
carne five or six names. I gave the nvini• myself.
D:it Vilmarcati give any !bloc fur that lust intellipnre ?
Det, I gave him this list to bud cost who the person was
who called at my house.
Did you give any of the papers to Iligatiti ! I did not
give them to Rugsuiti, but to Vilmarcati.
Hair long was it after you gave the list to Vilmarrati that
posy master hoew of it' Oes the same day that I guild the
Advocate Puiazzi, that tease day I gave the list to Vtitnar-
age. L.
Did yes &hoer any other papers to .V.lasarcati after De-
. Afthert 10114 except the list' Nu.

',W.^ pm, di., .

- • -)"•