The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1820-11-20 00:00:00

FOLKSTONE.

On Saturday die inhabitants manifested every
feeling of exultation at the termination of the
Queen's trial. The town baud was resembled, and
accompanied by an immense concourse of speciii.
tors, they paraded the different streets. An appli-
cat was made to the Rev. Thomas Pearce, the
curate of the parish (who, from some misunder-
standing between him and the ringers, has prevent-
ed the bells being rung for many months), for per-
mission to ring the church bells on the occasion;
but he refused, and accompanied his refusal by the
application of one of the most opprobrious epithets
to the Queen that can be applied to the lowest of
the female sex. The populace, with the band, as-
sembled in the evening iii front of the Clergyman's
house, awl after playing some popular airs, smashed
a part of the windows.

SANDWICH.

Oa Saturday, on the arrival of the trews of the
Bill of Palos and Penalties being thrown out of the
!louse of Lords, the bells of the different churches
were rung, colours were hoisted on the shops in the
harbour, and in various parts of the town ; a band
of music, with colours, paraded the streets till a
late hoar, ■nd this glorious triumph of our gracious
Queen over her enemies was hailed with every
demonstration of joy. On Wednesday evening
upwards of sixty of the respectable inhabitants
of the loan supped at the Fleur.de.lis. to corn.
memorate the event, where several songs, and sen-
timents given, were received with such hearty
cheers, as almost to make the walls of St. Peter's
church shake : even• popular friend of the Queen
was given with three times three, including the

NM

LONDON,

MONDAY. NovEmnLrt 20, 1620.

An account of her MAJESTY'S attendance at
Hammersmith church yeaterday is given in another
part of our Paper. Ilrr MAiRSTY went to the
church in it civriage rid pair of horses, anti when
in it declined the superb chair prepared for her ac-
cummodation. This humility become a wounded
spirit come to seek comfort in humbling itteif be-
fore its Creator, and returning thanks for its deli-
vernoce from its rimeniiri.
Her Nl.l.lvsTY will intend divine service at St.
Paul's on Wedaeaday the 29ili Mosta, instead of
Sunday the 261 h.

The conjecture we expreseit on Friday respect-
ing a fixed resolution entertntne l in a certain high
quarter not to assign to the Qt;f:rN a royal palace
for her 'Majesty's residebce, tom; out unhappily to
be ton correct. In snottier pit', of our Paper will
be found a copy of Lord ttcglitroot.'s letter to the
QUEEN. apprising her that he laid her NI AJI.STY'S
request before the KING, and had "received his
MaiEsTY's command to inform the QUEEN that it
is not possible for his NI A 3 MY. under nll the rim.
eumstanees, to assign :toy of the royal palaces for
the Queen's residence."

We understand that her MaierrY. on receiving
this communication, immediately required the so-
teisdance or her A TTORN ET alid Sot iciroft.GE-
NSot,tciroa-Ge-
NF.RAI., to consult with them upon what further
steps it might be proper to adopt in tlii4 emergency.
Mr. BROUGHAM mid Mr. DENSI AN instantly obey-
ed the SIIII1111091,; and, after mature deliberation,
it was determined that her Ma.insTY should spin
mite to the Earl of LIVERPOOL. urging in still
stronger terms he► original demand.
This letter was immediately conveyed to the Earl
of LIVERPOOL by the HOG. Mr. KEPPEL CRA.
vstt ; but up to a late hour on Saturday night no
answer had been received.

Nothing can be more vague than the terms used
by Lord LIVERPOOL in the presence he Olin for
refusing a palace to her MAJESTY. What does he
mean by the words " under the circunistatices ?"
What circumstances can justify the Ministers of the
Crown in treating the QUEEN with indignity after
the defeat of their prose and the rejection of
their Bill ? No charges are now suipended over
Itrr MAJESTY'S head—there is no tribunal delibe-
rating upon her guilt or innocence—Parliament has
resolved that her MAJESTY shall not be deprived
of the honours and dignities that belong to her
raiik, and yet, in defiance of its authority. the
Ministers of the Crown have revolved to treat
her MAJESTY as if she were convicted of crime,
and sentenced to receive degradation as her
punishment. We cannot believe that Lord LITER-
Poor. and his Colleagues have any intention of
adopting any further proceedings against their
QuEsx. Could we conceive them capable of such

. N. 9•
• 44

MIME