The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1820-11-21 00:00:00

1;111
NINISTIRIAL inoturrs AGAINST
*Marla.

Moved, That the forties consideration or the Bill be ad-
journed so Ibis day mix swaths. Winds bring objected, the
viewless was rat iheresiorms..-11 was resolved in he
alartnative.

Was minim.
Breause no sufficient ground appears for the obsoloomert
of the Bill founded on the charges spinet her Majesty the
\Queen, which had undergone the most aulenin and aceurate
investigation; charges in which the morality of the country
was deeply interested, and on which 311 the Peers, spiritual
and temporal, who delivered iloir opinions, with very
fsw exceptions, declared their conVietiun of her guilt ;
and the abauchniment of whirl) is a dereliction which may
bring into disrespect nut only the diameter of our highest
Court of Judira•sre, het that of the Nation itself. Aid it
it with the greatest concern we observe the extreme want of
consideration for the Sovereign, by the dereliction of pro-
ceedings so necessarily brought os, by which a wife, declared
by the House of Peers to have bees guilty of adulterous in.
gelatinise with a menial servant, and of a conduct the most
depraved, is to remain his QUILIII Compri, thus lowering the
dignity of the Crown, and entbarraming the country with
far greater difficulties than those which seem to have in-
duced his Majesty's Government to relinquish the plows.
lion of the Bill. SH r.Fri El-D.
NORTHUMBERLAND.
I.OfHIAN.
HILLIAM.

AJbue,lo Die Neveinbiie, 1810.

DtmgreseuT,
Because, that in • case adds nature, in which this House
appears to us, by its RegoWastes to read the Bill a td time,
by its proceedings in the Committee upou the Bill and the
Report, and by its Resolution to read the Bill a third time,
'to have strongly manifested, that, is the judgment of • Ma.
*illy of this House, the guilt imputed in the Preamble of
the Bill had been dearly proved, we think that cons,derations
affecting the justice and boouur of the House made it fit
that the Bill should pass.
Bemuse this appears to of to have bees the more fit in •
case in which so many Peery, who voted against the third
reading of the Bill, had declared their convictiou that the
guilt imputed had been proved.
B•castse we also think that the House ought not, in consi-
dering whether the Bill should pass afore its having been
read • third time, to have beet, influenced lay any regard to
what might take place is an inquiry in the other House of
Parlismcnt, as was suggested in the course of our debates,
save only that we deem it to have been just that the party
occults(' should have bad an opportunity of calling fur the
judgment of both Howes, wises this House, proceeding by
• Bill of Pains sad Penalties, had rammed in its Resole-
limns judgment unfavont able to that party.
Because we anima but apprehend that the Resolution to
adjourn the ((other consideration of the Bill will had to
great inimppiehe 11l ioo n as 10 the real °Motion of the klajority
of the Pesos of this House, as it is to be colleted frum
the isotreedent proceedings properly understood, with refer.
race to the question span the guilt imputed to the Party
accused in the Preamble of the Bill.
BRIDGEWATER.
VF.RVLAtI.
SH A FTESBURY.
WILLIAM.