The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1820-11-08 00:00:00

The Archbishop of Casiterbory observed, that lA. Mort
Reverend Brother (the Archbishop of York) had stated to
their Lordships, that he felt a difficulty is voting for the
divorce clause on religious grunads; bid he could not coul-
eur with him in this feeling, for a divorce o staters *ale,-
monii, for cense of adultery, was consistent with the law of
Gad; and they would And ignition,' of divorces pronosenced
on this geom..' in this country, antecedently and subse-
qnently to the Reformation. On this, therefore, he grounded
himself in supporting the clause; fur he told their Lord-
ships that a divorce fur the cause he had stated was
consistent with the direct and express revealed law of,
God. Divorces fur adultery were not forbidden by the
rations and constitutions of the Established Church,
and there was nothing in them contrary to the com-
mon law of the land. Marriage harmed one of the
strongest supports of social order, and therefore it had bees
the must anxious object of every State to rcuder it as suletan
mid binding an ordinance as portable ; bolt, notivithstandiug,
divorces for the crime of adultery had prevailed in this sotto-
try nut only antecedently. but subselpiently to the Rotolo-
tton. Under the law of WWI, divorces bad been admitted,
partly fur general, sod partly fur special csuses. The New
'testament permitted divorces for the crime of ado! cry
Onr Saviour said, as his woad's were recorded by St.
Matthew, that where • dissolution of marriage took place
fur any cause but farnication only, such dissolution would
he followed by adultery hi the parties marrying again. St.
Mark and St. Luke gave the general prohibitory urdinshce
ouly without the excirtion. Bet is interpreting the true
geese of these ;images, they were to take that which was
less express, and measure it by the one more express. It
appeared, therefore, that there was a divine authority for
/1111ffeell for the speciel cause of adultery. l• our own law
the same exception occurred. With respect In the tondnet
of the Qurru he had nothing to say put this, that the acts
charged hail Laren inquired IWO, awl, iu his upittion, a case
of adultery established. Therefore he saw nu objection of
any description, and least of alt a religious one, against
this Bill being passed in the manner usual in similar castv.
Lord King sable few words which were out heard below
Bit her.
The Bishop of Worcester spoke at considerable length on
the clause, but is so low a lour of voice as to be with great
difficulty audible iu •liiklonft. We understood his Lordship
lu say, that lie could itairbrisig himself to suppoit the divorce
clams, ,as the parties stood in so different a sitnatios there
from what they would if the case could have gone illlo au-
other Court.' _

The Bishop of Landaff was understood to say, that his
♦iew of the ease entitled him to give bis consent to the
clause. There was no qualifying clause to our Samna's
ilijuncliou in regard to adultery. Ile apprehended aelious
danger to public morals from rejecting the dance, and thus
le./9'lllg it to be supposed *hit proved adultery might so far
pass unpunished.

The Bishop of London said, that after the most painful
and anxious attention devoted to the inquiry, be felt him.
self called upon to rapport the clause. lie believed that
with respect to the permission given by Scripture to dissolve
• marriage fur the cause of adultery, there was no doubt
whatever. He could nut sultacribe to his Most Reverend
Brother's (the Archbishop of York) doubts on the subject,
as he bail not stated any pentads to them. He thought that
those who opposed the clam*, on the ground that both pare
ties slid nut possess equal 011.41111 of redreesing their cutijugal
iujuries, had riot observed that there was • ercat constitu-
tumid principle involved in the Bill begone them, namely,
that the King could out lie supposed capable of cumulating
any crime. The Queen, therefore, had uo right whatever
to recrimination. Many Divorce Bills had been passed is
that Illutiae, where the conduct of the histibalid had beets
notoriously repro hensible. In a mural, religious, and consti-
tutiorsl of view, he felt Wood to support the clause.
The 1::01 of Lauderdale said, that he rose with some dif-
Realty to tlw discussion of thia question. He could nut but
recollect that be bad heard it said in that House, that the
istelasion of the dense would'ilegrade the King. Was it to
be said that the King was uut to have Irons this Muse that
remedy by • Bill of 'divorce which was allowed in common
caws ? Nobody, he thought, would say so. But though he
should contend that this clause ought to stand as part of the
Bill, he was nut for supporting it in the same way that the
Right Reveresul Prelate who bail addressed the House last
lead supported it. When a Lady contracted marriage with
the King she theieby entered tutu a public end responsible
situation ; she because invested with peculiar risbt., and
hail ',ebbe duties to perform. la the present este he con.
ceived that her Majesty had betty proved incapable of per-
forming these public duties, arid Ilwrefore Ise was prepaitd
to give his amen( to that part of the Bill which Attu iv. d
her of her public rights and privileges. But dal lie say that
there was oar law for the King awl another for the subject
in this respect ? No ; he held the same opinion with a
Learned Doctor (Lushingtor) who had addressed the Huns.
ou basal of bet Majesty. The la* of marriage was the
same in the rase of the King and the subject. The It nil
'Prelate who had spoken last bad sperkeis of that principle of
oar Constitution which said, that the King could du no
wrong. Ile (Lord Lauderdale) .thought that a false
idea prevailed through the world with regard to the cri-
estimably incurred by the husband by committing adultery.
Ile knew that. though adultery was no crime in common
law, it was criminal in Ecclesiastical law; bust even in the
Ecclesiastical law it wan peruidied as a pectufans, and rot as
a crime. At first he had thought that it would be humus
able to degrade the Quetta, without divorcing her alas; be.
cause, if they slid not destroy the Queen as it respected
her lights of a femme civil', she would 13:111211iU • femme
enarerle, and the King would he liable for lair debts
His mind had Imes relieved by faith r examination. He
••• now tonviticed that it would be impartible to divorce
the Quern without following the practice in ordinary Bills
of that character. The husband was kept its amendence
usually in the House, to be subject to examinatiou, though
in few instaucea bad the examisatinat really takes place, be.
eauswthe merits of Mecum were thuroughly iuvestigated is
the Courts autecedent to the Bill coming be fore the Muse.
lie cuuld out rimiest while they were degrading the Quito,
on account of the dangerous example of her conduct, that
the conduct of the Kiug, Whose example must be more
powerful, should be led without any restraint. He objected
to she:clause.
The Earl of Darnley said, that his opinion hail not been
altered by any thing which had bees advanced from the Res
vereud Brawls. Ile wished to put • question to seine of the
Reveresel nod Leonard Lords. The decree of the Gospel
wee, " He that putted' away his wife fur other cause save
committing adaltery,eausesti her to commit adultery." He
wished for infurinatiou, to knew if he understood the pas-
sage rightly. The Queen bad beets pan away frum her hus-
band kir nu triune, and without her own consent; bad her
husband or had he taut teemed her to commit adultery ? If
he dills according to the in iociples of the Cation Law could
the Muse grant bins that relief which would be denied to
any other husband who had so acted? As to the. Bill, With
ur without the clause it could nut pass. If the clause uurlJ
out Ire retaiiied, Oat would be the use of the Bill ? Could
the wife of the King be less than the Queen? He bad heard
ahuich of the unisiiputeuce of au Act of Parliament, but it
mould not alter the ',inure of things. The Queen could out
be deprived of her title except she were to be divorce &from
the King. The prosecutors were tied in a dilemma out of
which they were welcome to escape as they could. Any
way, that detainable measure, which could no; puuthly do
soy gthAl, must soon be put au cod to, though the precise
degree of mischief which it had operated would nut be
Bishop A. esplaiited the text quoted by the Noble Earl
to " whosoever puttelle wady his wife, dcc. causer(
her to marry woullies man, thereby causelb her to tonsenst
adultery."
The Fail of Darnley expligined.
The Bishop of Landsff corroborated the exposition of the
Revereint Prelate who spoke last but one.
The Earl of Donoughature cap/ease& *Hue surprise that
his Noble Priem' (the Earl of Lauderdale) hod Not, besot sans-
_ bed With the uptown which 4 been ptorolunted upon Ike

lideslitni of Mimes by she Keret& BMA. .f Skase.. Me
I ridiculed she pawky sf the sexennest of his Mehl. Friend rib
ppeeiltsg the rospoosibility for debt to which be hod aihsdsd.
I This bras not the ease of as lisvidool season for relief.
The Kist bad asked for Iso relief rues as brad of the State.
The State, their Lordships, sad the Ministers had solicited
relief, sot the King. His Lordship was of option that lan
little (whist bid bees Isbellested for Hutt !theorises Pat-
Dosage throughout these pruceediuga. If Ikea:ban% eras it
s hold her situatken after all that hail bora proved,
their proreediogs moat go for nothing. They had wily
wasted fifty days of their valuable lime to so pit/Vow.
He thought those persons meted wroogly who had presumed
to introduce the Hide's name in this precreding. lie did'
not wish royally to be degraded: there was too Muds of that
feeling not of doors. The measure had been introduced few
the relief of the /hate; and all be asked, and shit was Hot
woeh, that the remedy 'honk' be given in the manner
least likely to prejudice its character. The House had de-
!Oared by its vote, that it conceived the Queen to hare ren-
dered herself unfit for the rank of Queen Consort ; and-
they owed it to themselves, they owed it to the women, they
wired it to the character of the constry, that she should
mot he continued in the character of the wife of the Kin*
Every one of the majority most have beer of opioisan that
adultery hut been proved ; several of the nsiskwity bad'
also declared their cosmic:lion of Ilse /HMI!. A get those
was the venerable Prelate the Archbishop of York, who,
though oppitarel so the m .jority on the question of the
second reit/hog, had rapt-tared his opinion that the Queen
was guilty, yet thought it was not justifiable that she should
be divorce.l.—[Sume interrsptioa having beets given to the
Noble Lord during Isis speech by calls of a Order" sad
" Quest iga," he said, those interruptions were disgraceful
only to those who used themosed for his own part he treated
them with sovereign contempt.) This Lady, be contitresed,
sias unfit for the station of Quern Consort; she had
been proves) guilty of adultery, mid to let her remain Quash
tie her still closer to her Majesty, Is, give him no relief,
Mon 1.1 he to manifest a great disregard, he would not say to
the feelings of his Majesty, because they hid beeu told front
ati:burity shut his Majesty had nu feeling us the subject,
but to their own consistenry. With respect to the feeheuges
Of his Majesty, he must say, that he believed there never
had beets ally public prucetliaguf such motorist, of such am.
porlance as this, in which any person au direrily interested
had taken see lit Ile forward a past. He slid not, if he might
be allowed to use the expression, be Jul nut rare what sasigist
be the feelings of that Illustrious Person—be did out view
this measure with any relat• to those feelings. God forbid
that either ht, or the Mosistris, or Hint House, al Id ever
and themselves to soy such feelings! hot as it State mea—
slier, he thought the House should pass the whole Bill. Is
Biting this opinion he acted not according to the (relines of
the King, but •:curding to bin °rm. It was as a State mese
suer that he had voted Gir tier Bill, and be thought it ought
to toe paserd altogether; for is what situation would they
stand, if, after egret lag that She -p.camble had bees proved,
they should refuse to pass the divorce clatter?
The Bishop of (leaky bid, that the Noble Lord who
gook,: last baying stated that 'the whole of the Bishops, is.
cept the tearrable Prelate (the Archbishop of York) who bad
so ably exin.undrd the erelesiasiical law of marriage, agreed
In the propriety of the divorce clause, he felt himself called
upon to declare, that by oo consideratiou whatever could
he, consistently with the dictates of his conscience, be in.
Jared to vote for shell Bill with the divorce clause.

Lord Donoughtnore explained.
The Earl of Hari uwby said, that the ground on which the
Noble Eirl (Demotichewer) bad placed ii, was, in his mind,
an additional übjece sun to the clause. The tatroduction of
that clause might lend to give a differeot character to the
Bill from its tree one. It might give it the appearauee of a
leaving for its object the relief of a partienlar India
•idesl, while, in reality, et was a measure of State policy;
and lie, therefore, wished it to be considered as wholly dis-
tinct front the object of personal relief. The King and
Quern Intel been many years separated, and that separation
bad been rreoguistal by an Act of Parliament. According
to the Laws of Divorce, persons in that sleuth» were not
entitled to relief from the marriage toe. And he thought
it wry object tale for the House to do that in this par.
Beeler ease, which it could not do in any other of the same
nature. As this was a measure of State policy and wet of
personal relief, the divorce clause could truly be justifiable
tin the ground ut some overwhelming stale isecirmity, but be
saw nothing of that Lind in the present ca.t'.
Dill nixie Memo spoke fur sonie time against the Bill;
hut from the situatiou of ibis venerable Peer under the
Gallery, and from the excessive weakness of hie voice, we
wield scarcely ascre min ley the sound that any version was
'rat Mg. We unlit caught one sentence distinctly, wherein
tie mated. with supple C 1111.114512, how their lestdohips could
lake wpm themselves to interpose between MAN and wife,
in k case wherein neither of the parties themselves required
the it lute efertiece!
The Earl of Liverpool said, that on a former occasion, when
some observations were mask on the divorce elegise, as being
u ineature of personal relief to the illesi r I 0000 s individual on
the throne, be had disclaimed any measure of that kind,
and had stated that 'fit should appear to be the wish of their
Loitiliips, he would not press that clause. He now wished
to say a few words iu Reply to the misunderstanding pagans*
Nibble Lord. no this poise He had never viewed this pro-
ceeding as a Hill of Divorce, hut always as a public measure;
and in no oiler, light could it be viewed—in pellet of fact a
Queen was never divorced. He would put the strorgest
case that could be put, ■smely, that of a young King mar-
ried to a young wife, who should be proved to be godly of
conduct the most gross and unbecuatiug, and lie would say,
that even its that ease they muld nut wort-tails it as a totes.
sure of personal relief. Some Noble Lends epsomite seemed
to think that it was impossible to degrade the Queen with-
out following up their proceedeog dimmer, for that
to degrade the Queen without divorcing her would be to de•
grade the King also. But be could slow that nu such Co.WI
betinCnCe necessarily followed. Suppose a Qiiern lu be
guilty of a feauuy, of uue of the highest crimes known to our
lawerrould any man say that it would nut be proper to degrade
her from her dignity, and deprive her of her rights and pri-
vileges as Queen i And yet they could out divorce her in
that case. Fur he believed that he should be supported by
the authority of the whole bench of Bishop! in saying, that
■ divorce could not take place on any seller ground but that
of adultery; stud yet be thought hardly a man could be
foetid to mai tttt tin that there were taut may other acts
which she might curtsied, desersaug of degradatiem. He
did uut presume to give an opinion me religious points, but
theopiniou which he was inclined to follow was that of the
venerable Prelate, the Metropolitan of this province—
that divorces were clearly allowable on the score of
adultery ; and that the right of recrimination wee net an
institnti..n of the Divine law, hut was wisely devised by
mar, for the purpose .of compelling the complaining pony
to show that he came reefste in curium. He knew that
mlikoy persons of religious feelings objected to the divorce
idasse, on the ground of the supposed right of recrimina-
HOY. But the Learned Prelate he bad alluded to, bad fairly
stated in reply to this, that the conetitutitinal nisei%
gist " the King can do uo wrung," wholly destroyed that
plea; fur the King's corduct was thereby declared out
iitarualde to guy power; and yet would any man say, that
la no case lead a King any right to a divalent? He was aware
that, count cud with ibis topic, many calumnies wee isi etr.
eslatiuu—caluiunies which it Will easy to circulate, but

difficult to saute, however groundless, mid many of IN*
'thin-id to events that had passed bug shire. But he mar*
lie permitted to any, that it was anjart in any matt I.
judge upon beariug wily one side of buds riatements, and
without braise acirusiuted with every circumstance cosi.
untied oath the crews to which such stateineuts related.
It was known that twenly..four }ears ago a separation took
place which wrs anus tinned by the Klux and coufirmed by
Act of Parliament. Now, iu souse muds a doubt 'Rasta
whether, after sit long a separation, the House could pro.
(veil to a total dMululion of the marriage. No such dirobar
operated tau his ono miud; but where many of the 'enigmas
part of the community felt au anxiety on the subject, sad
• where some doubt did exist, aud there was so oveserlo Waft
Slate necessity which peremptorily required macho nterespre,
be was ready to agree that it ought be better amt thunkeNta
should be withdrawn. He /therefore wan of opinion% . Os
clause should be ietrodoced, iu piece of the otaeee of
Curie, COlstil wing the separatiou, soil calculated to resent
the inconveniences which might arise Irons the situatiou of
the Quetta.
The Lord Chancellor gild, he cushi noingree In the post-

lion lair) al5 by that enlightened commentator on the law
of England, Oliteltslone, that maninge was • mere veil
contract. He had always esteemed it, and linked he thought
its istatiteution eleaely proved it to he a contract io its nil.
tore partly civil and partly religious. A merely nail too.
tract it could not lie, because it was out the child, but the
parent of 'warty--
" Prtiticipioni itririti, el eeipietalleire fundanientom."
It woo • civil cuetrart with respect to civil rights, and a
religion• nomad with respect to religion,. rigida. Ili.
Loma, omit, that d Iles time of the Re forweitioa,
esker metes minds were set atiat on such subjects, it
was • prevailing upiteion that marriage rag merely a civil
contract ; but, except the ECClelliall•Cil law was roe part tsf
lire law of the land, it wen a religions no well as a civil eon-
tract. The civil law knew seuthieg of diveree. but Parlis•
meat had interposed to give relief where die civil las snit
the law of the lan! bad no remedy; but rhino to a pollee.
tar period, their Lordships lied no stands lig meter, ',Tinier
that there should have been an action al law previously, sod
It was ant till the year 17t13 that they hid ah:an,6ngo„l r
tie render it requisite the preeecediuge in the Lei lesia,ete4
Court should be priaeloced wills the petiiion to that
nut Ibis he meant from that to infer that cases 'meld i.• t
occur where their Lordships would hot ferrite a me •iotll
action at law to have been commuted oil tlie-preeeedinea
in the Ecclesiastical Conn, I/I be produced. best it wail a rule
by which they had bound themselves not to proceed withent
knowing if the puny seeking relief were twitted or mot.
With • view to expe.lienev and public moral*, ht mod have
leave to put the Hume a mind, Ilia will. respect to re.
reirdisiation, lee (mild not bud any Scripture meth...its that
the .01114USlitittld SIM be a at away if the M4ll had hismelf
been guilty. Their lordihipa, fur the pew. etheu of public
morals, had laid it Mont that a patty Sr. keel re :le f at their
bands, was nut retitled he cumplain of another, if he had
himself Goodin. the &dig:door by which he was himself
bound. Their Lordships iis general would nut let a veins..
'come to their liar fora divorce. He reedlert I rt. mt one case,
that of Mrs. Addison; but Oat was a special our, and did cut
invalidate the general rule, that their Lordships wohld nut
genet that remedy to female., except iii part.eielar virtues'.
stators. There the adultery was with the n•ter. and it was
usi the ground that it was interioons min fiery Ilist the House
relaxed their sole. They also re laurel Use role further, and
very properly, in his opinion, relieved her from the nectasity
of bringing a previous action.-.. 3 cnulitiun whorl she could
not have complied with. Aguish gentrally speaking, their
Lordships raid, where there bail been a long separation,
that oat a ease is which they would rclurtanthy inter.
pose. Reluelseetly, be nod, because be should lie sorry
if it could be said that in no such We Ilira would iii.
terpose—berause it might possibly happen that a woman
might so cundirct herself as to render it ouposselele for Inc
kistabawd to live with her, and she migtio afterwards content
adultery; i• which case, undoubtedly the hushing.' might
ask fee relief. There wile many ether duties imundenst vu
• husband, and other thisgs In maid, besides committing
adultery with other women. The Noose hail said, tint ii.
no
case 'lmola the henbaud lake advantage of his oven
urgli-
geace; and in a ease not two years ago, where the hie.bra,l
weut to trellised iu Ike moult, of October, ail I did nut re-
join leis wife till the mouth of August folioale.g, 'be Mose
thought that such an iiistance of neglect. that they kft him
to the cons 111 l see law of the country. A Noble Carl who spoke
from ler the gallery, and fur whose opiniosi• lie Menem-
eel the highest respect, considered that tin Home could wet
Mee, pan, because tiny would have hereafter to tender the
Bell to the King; but be apprehended it win only in that
way it could he peopused foe the consent of his klajesly.
Suppose the ease of the most virtuous King that ever net rat
the throne of tinge realm,. and his wife bad been convicted
of adedierrootry the party fur high treason, or proceed O.
whatever way they would, could the King get rot of his wife
if that were • valid übjectoun ? It was impassible that be
could but by suffering the law to take place; but accenting
to the neglectful of she Noble Earl, ne every casesthey most
remain together till death does them part. Such NM; the
getter*, view of the subj. ct, he would beg their Lnritthep• to
consider what was the expediescy, for it aunt he opine ex-
pedieuey sills u flee regard to justice, that their deeisime
would be founded. Supposing the preamble proved—soil
it ensile! be iu the recullectioa of the Heise, that yesterdlV
hi had raid uo mhe couiel vote for the sensed reedit"( who
Idid out conceive that the preamble was proved—he nimbi
nut reconcile it to expediency to declare her Majesty guilty,
and there to slop. They had decided on the truth of the
preamble of the Pill, by reading it a second time. The
greed.' use wheel, he apprehended the divorce clause propel ly
mood in the origionl proceedings was this:—lf they poe-
t need. d to degrade the (Aileen only, they most sptcify every
! immunity, dignity, and prerogative which they took away;
now one of her highest prerogative was, that she shush! be
! considered as a fess** str!e, slit might site or be sued abuse
i —these, if they seek away her rights in that respect, they
would w offset connect her mach closer wills her meson
than she hail hitherto been. Should their Lordship he of
op' • that Hee clause ought Hut 10 Maud us aroma of
the separatism, why "hued.* fiery out legislate to make that
separatien effettual T The Act uf bid tate Alsjoety could slot
lie put out of their considevatiou in whatever peons of view
they regarded it. He thought it necessary to declare that is
his opinion ibere did nut live a man who bad brew guilty of
mum cruelty and injustice Its divorce cases, if the evidence
on these psucerdinga did nut justify the Maritime of the
divorce clause. Each of their Lurdships femalel feu their
opinions ute the 'object. He should reserve drelarieg his
own opinion till be had beard that of others, awl received
all the light winch alisemaios could afford to Mai He conkl
! not sit down without saying. that he Isupstl he should learn
the opinion* of these to whom he alluded, by mote other
I Mean/ thaw hearing them declare, Cement or Nuo-Cuu-
tent.
The !Hanoi, of I-anodes* protested against being mime-
dered humid by the Atchison of yesterday.

Lord Duncan said he could not solrer the Noble and
Learned Lord's speech to co forth to the world, without ex.
peening his dissent frees the opinion that the preamble had
been proved. Supported as it was by evidence u( such a
suspicious character, be, for oae, could rut agree In declare
It proved.
The Earl of Liverpool said, be believed the regolor way
bo proceed would be to report progress.
The Earl of Straftesborp pot tire rialeatiors that the Haase
• ties. resume. His Lordship declared fist tie Gallegos
bsd it, but a division b►ing called fur, strangtve were or-
dem.) to withdraw, but the divide's was sot pressed.
The Hoare thee. resumed, sod sdisessed tell to-morrow
morning, at tea o'clock.

ADDRESS TO THE QUEEN.

Yesterday. pursuant to a requisition signed by
above lOU itihrbitatits of the united perishes of St.
George, Bloomsbury, and St. Giles-inathe-Fiehb.
• public meeting was held in the Freemason;
Hall, (heat Queen-street, for the purpose of con-
weleriog the propriety of presenting an Address to
her Majesly Queen Caroline. Long before taelve
o'clock the body of the'Hall and the pllerit% ,rre
crowded to excrete by • most respectable aosein-
blage af Ladies and Gentlemen.
The Chair was taken by J. A. Willie, G rp. our
of the Churchwardens, who, in a few *flea., stated
the object of the meeting. and expressed his Lope
that ore'', person would obtain a fair and candid
hearing. Messrs. I'. Moore, M.P., Sir Gerard Noel,
M.P., Major Cartwright, mac. were preset on the
platform.
Leiters were read from the Marquis of Tavistuck,
Sir It. Wilsoo. Mess's. Grey Bennett, Denman,
Whitbread. &c. apologising for their absence. but
expressing their high approbation of the object of
the meeting, and their wish that the united grace
of the people might be directed by petition to the
House of Commune against the Bull. Sir F. Bur-
dett aod Mr. Hubhuuse had burn applied to, but
returned no answer.
Mr. Press bloom' then rose to move the first
resolution. He brgau by thanking the Couansittee

apreestei ft, sal he greyest VA tS.4lil nit WWI ewe
dimwit the reel of his Ufa to eotedeose W drpeolie
The Bishop 'CChem&ld, lhol'iwiliktbv teed 4+
With the lempeowitio that stades' pews( hoed
bees give*, voted Go the seemed reedlog of BO Bit; yet It
tr... the ooderstoodiog that the divorce chaise should sot
reothoso to stood as pew of it.--(Hostr.)-04 this males
he judged as he hoped to be jodged. _ _