The National Register.
London, England, 1820-11-12 00:00:00

THE NATIONAL REGISTER

Majesty Caroline Amelia Elizabeth, then, and ni sutra
case, this present Act, and all the matters and film es
roatained therein, shall 'weenie utterly void and of no
effect, and the whole of the Preamble thereof shall be
deemed and taken to be false, cahnimion,, and seantla-
bins, upon the same evidence on which it bath now Leen
held to be sufficiently proved." (Lund cheering, with
sonic cries of order.)
Lord COLVILLE (of Culross, in Scotland, one of the
Scotch Peers) ruse, with much %%anent, to vindicate him-
self, and those who acted with him in favour of the Bill.
lie said they were aspersed—they were attacked—by this
motion. He wished, HlCEtfOtt', to know whether that
Noble Lord was in order. (Hear, hear.) He was pro-
ceeding, but was 11;111Sell interrupted by
Lori, lIOLLAN who speke to order. The Noble
Lord (Colville, of Ciilress) had asked whether his Noble
Friend was in order, but had not shown him to lie disor-
derly, or pointrei cut how, a Lich every Noble Lord was
bound to do who took upou hint to interrupt another.
(Loud cheers.) The motion, he verily believed, might not
be agreeable to the Noble Lord; but it did not, un that
account, become disorderly. (Hear, beer, bear.)
Lord LAUDERDALE, with great vehemence, sup •
ported the objections to land King's clause. He yielded
to no man in loyally, but he thonght this motion attacked
every Prier who had supported the Bill ; and it was the
manors ut making it, rather that; the 11101i011 itself, which
all miler perceive to be disorderly. (Clatters.)
Lord IxING could out allow that any thing disorderly
was continued in his clause. It ascribed Ile motives to
any o:te except loyalty. of which reel y one was, and justly
might be, proud. It only affirmed what was the necessary
consequence of loyal feelings, and assumed that their
Lordships, as loyal men, the moment the Queen-Consort
because, by succession, Queen-Regnant, would change
their 1)(144 respecting her conduct. 'nits was a ...ices:co.!.
consequetice of their regard for the first principles of the
Constitution, by which every Monarch was deemed
" most execiltet," %%iliac:tit any regard to his conduct or
character.
The clause was iiegatived without a division, and the
Chairman was dirt-cue.' to report the Bill.
The House resumed, cud ordered the Report to be re-
ceived to-morrow.
THURSDAY, NOV. 9.
The Lord Chancellor took his seat on the woolsack a few
minutes before ten o'clock. Prayers were read, and the
list was read over. Apologies were made fur the Marquis
ut Ilerifoid, Lords Holland, Limerick, Huntingdon, and
Motley, who were indisposed.
It yes then revolved, that any Peer might sign the Pro-
test this slay. and that Lord Holland should be allowed to
sign it when he was sufficieutly recovered to attend the
Hou,e.
Lord SHAFTESBURY brought up the Report of the
Committee.
The amendments relating to the alteration of the name
of Bergami, were put and agreed to.
Lord ELLEN BOROUGH understood that many Noble
Lords had voted fur the second reading of the Bill, in the
uuderstauding that it would undergo such modification
the Cunanittee, and the only alteration that had been
made, was omitting the article " the." He therefore
hoped, that those Noble Lords who had voted for the se-
coed reading in the bapectation of the Bill being meatier:,
would oppose its turther progress.
The Earl of LAUDERDALE cosh! not help remon-
strating on the conduct of those Noble Lords who had
voted against the Bill, and yet voted for the divorce
clause. His Noble Friend (Earl Grey) acknowledged
that he had Male so with the view of getting rid of the
Bill altogether. lie was astonished that any Noble Lord
could lend himself to such a trick and mane- uvre to get
rid of the Bill. tic should like to know, on ;shat prin-
ciple of .:onsisicticy those would act who voted for the,
scold reading, and yet would oppose die third reading of
the Bill?
Eat I GREY.—" My Lords—lt is not oily with surprise,
bat with sonic degree of indignatiou that I have heard the
charge of the Noble Lord who had just set down, who,
from habits of friendship, ought to have known me better
than to at!CIISC me of trick and menterivre! The charge
collies well from that Noble Lord certainly! But, my
Lord, my condect dining the allele of this unfortunate
investigatior, and my vote, have been fait and open, and
free from trick or in4ileetivre ! But w hat shall we say to
the tricks and suiteceuvres of those ale), to get VOWS ter
the wend reading of the Bill, held out helves of alt;:i a-
(ions and owditicationa in the Committee '[lie Noble
Lord on the woolsack, who had umuc «u eloquent speech
in lavour of the divorce clan,e, had, with the alwle of
the cabinet monsters, voted against the clause!—(Hear,
hear). My Liods, I felt tudignation mid disdain. and 1
might also use a stronger term, at the charge of my Noble
Diem!? Hid 1 been, like the Noble Lord, a supporter
of the bill, I could have felt no difficulty : the difficulty
with me was, that I was against the bill; but still I might
have stated sollicieet reasons for the vote, in my wish
not to add to the degredation of royalty, by &guiding
his Nhajesty, a, well iis '.is consort. Every thing that I
have heard; every thing that I have read; and every
thing that I hate theught on this subject, has coulirmed
my original opinion on this erasure. 1 had voted cult-
atientionsly that i did nut think the cheree against the
Queen had beets mule out; and yet i ',mad myself coin-
epellcd to vete ter the divorce clause, which might app's'
to give my sanction to the charge. I agree aitit the
Noble Lord behind me (Ellenhormigh), that those aho
voted fur the second etching of the bill, in the hopes ut
its la lug altered in the committee, have been deceived ;
but, of course, there %%etc no tricks, no 'name avres tit
this. The Noble Lords who have hunt thus deceived,
' and induced to press hli to a stage which it other
%%use would never leave a...ached, roust, however, oppose
the third reading of the Lill. I trust, toy Lords, I shall
be excused if I have expressed thyself warmly; but,
consitici lag the charge made against me, and the quarter
trout whence it came, I could not but heel it strotigly.—
My whits is to sr. ' aeol an this House, and to discharge
my duty faithfully and conscieutionsly.
Lord LAUDERDALE explaided. Übe were capable
on any account of say top what null! by possibiiity detract
Rum the character of fins Noble Frienii, it would he in-
finitely inure painful to him than any thing that ever
happened to him ii, the whole coarse of lust tat. But he
114.1 110 t used the word ouworilig trick. He had only said,
that it was a Parliamentary trick, often practised, and
never, perhaps, more effectually than on the present
occasiuu. He could assure his Noble Friend that, on all
occasions, be could have but otia (echos towards hint,

a feeling which had long existed, and must tollgates with
him to the end of his life.
Lord LI V LItI'OOL would fairly ask their Lordships
whether, iu any stage of this proeet ding, he could be justly
itecoved of holding out any expectations that had nut been
reales, d l lie had merely stated, on the second reading of
the Bill, that no Noble Lord ought to feel precluded from
voting, because of uny objections he might have to the pre.
preamble, or to the clause of divorce, both of which would
tie open to discussion in the Committee. Ile hod always
stated most distinctly, that the preamble was, in his non
opinion, most substantially proved, mid lie could therefore
never have held it out as his opiiiipu that any material alter.
titian would eventually take place
Lord CALTHORTE thought the vote which the Noble
Earl near him (Lord Grey) had given on the divorce clause
was perfectly consistent with all that he had heard (rout hint
on the subject of the proceeding. Ile avowed it, ut the
same time, to candour to his Majesty's Government, to say,
that he could not conceive tuiything Inure becoming-the
Moisten Ida country like this, than, whets they found tiny
previous impres,ions of their awn hostile to the public feeling
—it seemed to be a tribute of public feeling—to cute as tlury
had done yesterday. The divorce clause wits undoubtedly
at variance wit a the religious prejudices of It very cuosider•
able portion of the best tafortned and right judging part of
the community.
The LORD CHANCELLOR. said, that the only question
',flute the tram.e was, whether a word of thr:•e letters, tho
won!" the" should stand part attic preamble or nut 1 mid
he did not ima :ins that much le)it could have been noon
oa that point by the sort of canvass is high had h....en going
on, fin• he could call it nothing else, as to the votes on the
third reading of the Rill.
The Duke of HAMILTON said, it was necessary for hint
to state to the Ilia.se that he objected to the 11111 aitogetlii r.
Ile, therefore, w itliont entering into uny dLcussiun
the merits of so obnoxious a proceeding, would merely
move the omission of that part of the preamble in which the
words " adulterous intercourse" were mentioned. It might
he supposed that he would also object to the part containing
an enumeration of the punishments to he Indicted upon a
clinic, which, hi his opinion, hail not been legally mid de.
monstratively proved. In this stage of the Bill he should
nut do so, but merely confine himself to what he had at tint
proposed, and he should afterwards move it as a corollrey
to the former.

The amendment, that the words "adulterous Intercour3e"
be omitted, was negatived.
Lord k ITZWILLIANI said, the apullerous interepurse
had, in his opinion, by no means been proved. But he cal.
led on those Noble Lords who held an opinion that lice Ma-
jesty was guilty, to limit the period during which they ciao
sidered that she had been engaged In the criminal intercoursr,
to a portion of time previous to the year 1817, us no pool
whatever had hceu brought Coward of her communication
with the individual named in the Bill after that period.—
Ts refuse to adopt this 'principle would be extreme injustice
to the unfortunate accused.

Lord CARN AR VON said he had a clause to propose to
to the House, for the propriety of which he should refer to
to the former conduct of both Houses of Parliament, it was,
he observed, most necessary to mark in the Bill the real
cause of the present proceedings which, certainly, would
hewer have been entered upon bad her Majesty remained
abroad. The nativa well knew that Minkers had, ia
in conjuncrion with another great body occasionally mi-
llet:led with them, supplicated the Queen to put an end to the
proceedings against her, by leaving the country, and that
they had offered her the sum Of 50,0001. a year, upon
the condition of her absence from this country. W liatever
might he said to the contrary, his Majesty's fditikers had
made this proposition; and it was clear, that if the terms
had been accepted, the
.couniry would never have beard
mure of the investigation. The Noble Lord then moved au
:intendment, that there bltould he ititroduced into the Bill,
:trier the Nerd " uhittatl," words to thi: elleet : " That her
Majt-sty bad refused the sum of 50,0001. a yeur out of the
public money, prolferred to her as a homage from both
Houses of Parliament." _

The Amendment sus negatived without a division.
Lard F.INO moved that there should be a clause intio-
duced to the following effect, after the word
That certaiu English Commissioners appointed ut hlilau,
with an ltaliaii Attorney named Vilroacarti, had collected
a mitts of false, ealiimaillBs witnesses, who had beet. produced
Reid had given false testimony at their Lost-hips' bar fur
many ures.s, whereby the dignity of the Crown, the Nation,
a" the Parliament, had sidlered great scandal.' and dlbitolltlllf,
tutu that the Ilutise entreated that it should be enacted that
the persons who had acted on the Milan Commission should
be reneleied fur ever incapable of holding any place or peu-
biUll whatever.
The amendment was negatived; and the whole preamble
having been gone through, the Rouse adjourited.
TRIAL OF HER al Ael
THIRD READING OF THE PAINS AND PEINALTIES
BILL, AND ITS REJECTION:
FRIDAY, woe. 10.
The House met this morning at the usual hoar, *lieu
prayers sere read, and the list called over at usual
On the Order ut the Day for the third routing of the hill
being read, and the question being put,
Earl MORLEY rose, and said, lie had conceived it ne-.
cessary that some enquiry should take plaee into the con-
duct of her Majesty, and that his Majesty's 'Ministers were
called upou to institute such an enquiry ; and thinking
also that the measures taken lit Parliamesit were the most
likely to itivestibute the subject fairly, he had given his
vote fur the enquiry. Ho had, however, on Monday Ism,
opposed the secoud, as he now intended to oppose tile third
reading of the Hid, because lie did not think the Let:
ur as tiny ought to have been, incontestibly proved•
the King or
ever the prim aide was admitted of divorcing, It
the Queen, except in eases where the public safety required
it, what dangers would they nut runt The security of the
1111'011C and the satiny tit the State itself e until thus be ha-
g:utter'. Nu man was inure sensible ut the advantages of.
virtue and moral character in the Sovereign than himself.
but these were buthiug to the c.dvantages of hereditary ih!e•
cessic.n. The Noble Lord concluded by opposing the third
reailiie; of Ow
SOME AS spoke at some length in favour of the
Bill, as it seemed to him that the adailery had liven folly
proved, au opinion, he said, which had been also den ar ei
by several Solite !Ands who h.iil voted al,a.iist the second
reading of
the "is Londship concluded by observing,
that though some of the er 'deuce was rather coatradictury.
as, fur iibtance, that of Cuelii, yet, uponthe whole,
he
`felt conscientiously bounu to vote for the passing of tht-

Earl PORTESCUE said, that it was with much vain that

be now, fur the first time in his political life, differed with
his Nubile Friend near him (Lord Grenville). He thought
that it was impncsible to give to the sort of testimony pro-
duced, the t fleet of 'a legal proof of guilt. It was hilt too
true that persons in a royal station might be guilty of Im-
proprieties, and even tunics; but lie bail always enderstorel
is to he the wisest polies, to keep them as intich cone:mice
as possible! He was conviiiced that much mischief had been
done by this inquiry to the interests of the Monarchy; he
Loped that it was not yet quite irreparable; it was still in
tin it power to do much towards that desirable object, by
finally rejecting the Bill; and he for one could not in his
conscience give his vote otherwise.—[His Lordship spoke
in so low a tone as to be almost inaudible at the Bar : and
it was with difficulty We could collect what he said. The
above we believe to be the substance of his speech.)
The Duke of BEDFORD said that, in his opinion, the
measure was one which, to use the emphatic words of ano-
ther branch of the Legislature, " was derogatory to the.'
honour of the Crown, and injurious to the best interests of
the country." He did nut cote on the Divorce Clause, be-
cause he could not conscientiously vote upon it unbint
thinking the Queen guilty. It bad given him great asto-
nishment to sec Ministers supporting the omission of the
Clause, consenting to the castration of their own measure,
depriving it of the only feature which gave it the semblance
of rationality. Ile did not mean to go in detail into the
evidence, but he could not, however, help offering a few
remarks on some parts of the proceeding. A Noble Earl
opposite (Lord Liverpool) had commented on the evidence
in a manner which had given him great surprise. lie had
assumed some of the most important facts of the case as
proved solely by the testimony of that pure and immacu-
late witness De Mont. ll' had ventured to say, that she
was in one instance supports d by Dr Holland, but on the
iniautes of evidence being referred to no sect, corroboration
appeared. A Noble Lord on the cross-bench (Lord Lau-
derdale) had, equally to his astonishment, commented on
the evidence in a similar style, assuming facts to be con-
firmed by the evidence for the defence, which depended
only on the unsupported evidence for the prosecution.
There was another circumstance which he could not help
adverting to. The Noble Earl opposite (Lord Liverpool)
bad commented with what lie conceived a most nrisplai ed
severity on the conduct of her Majesty hi acting the part
of an Automaton. Nothing was more common than fur
persons in the higher situations to represent characters iii
ancient ur modern history, or the Gods and Goddesses of
fabulous story ; he had known it dotie by personages than
whom the Princess of Wales was nut more exalted in rank,
•nil whose chat acter the breath ul calumny had never dared
to assail. The truth was, every thing that could in any
way be turned to the discredit of her Majesty was nettle
Use of to effect the purposes of this Bill, without any re-
gard either to their justice or probability. He would ask
their Lordships, how the character of Queen Elizabeth
"mild have stood?—where the glory of her Is len would
have been ? if she bail been infected as the Princess of
pilules had beer., by spies and informers ? His Grace eon-
eluded by declaring, that if called upon, in his judicial
character, to give a verdict. on the evidence which had
been piodueed, he nitist say " Not Guilty, 00 my honour
and conscience !" and, if asked for his opinion as a Legis-
lator," that the Till was as impolitic as it was !"
The LORD CHANCELLOR.—" My Lords, at an early
stage of these proceedings, the second reading, 1 stated,
that it appeared to tne utterly impossible that any mail
could vote for the second reading who was not convinced,
not on moral conviction, butt on legal evidence, that her
Alaiesty was guilty. I did not state any thing as to the po-
licy or expediency of the measure; but I said it was still
comp* tent to your Lordships, if convinced that the sub-
etantial charge had been proved, that you might alter the
preamble so as to include all that you believed had been
proved, and rejecting all that you believed not proved by
legal evidence. I also stated that the enactment of the
might be altered. It was, therefore, tor y our I oril-
ships to decide whether the Divorce Clause should continue
a part of the Bill or not. The Learned Lord bete pro-
ceeded to argue at great length in favour of the Bill, and
concluded by saying, 1 feel gratified, and so I am sure will
your Lordships, that I ens now going to titter my last words
on this great and melancholy question. If I feel that the
Gutlt of the Queen bar been proved by legal evidence, I
shall act accordingly; but if I was not so convinced, Ito
earthly consideration should induce ire to vote fo.• the third
reading; but after hearing all the et idence, and devoting
Cs cry attention in my power to the subject, I cannot con-
scientiously but vote for the third reading of the Bill.
The Bishop of CHESTER rose to state, that lie had voted
for the second reading of the Hill upon the full conviction
that her !Majesty was guilty of the crime imputed to her,
which had been proved by circunistatitial evidence of the
strongest nature. Certainly the evidence had been tits mote
than circainstantial; but if the Queen wilt; itittocent, her
innocence was eccompaitied with seelt corrobetaids a guilt
as never had been heard of in the antials nt history. It
was from a moral view of the question that he was induced
to vote for the second wading of the Bill, but it would be
recollected that he had decidedly given his opinion and Isis
vote against the Divorce Clause. This lie had &rue because
lie cunsidered that Clause contrary to all established usages,
and opposed to the Div ine Precept. Notting could he more
abhorrent from his mind that; the idea of performing any
act which could tend to degrade his Sovereign ; " and it
is," the Rev. Prelate said, " v ith horror I htattl it stated
by a Nohle lord (Grosvenor), that if he vvas the Ai eh-
bishop of Canterbury, and lvid been requested by his Ma-
:testy to omit the Queen's name in the Liturgy, be would
throw the Prayer-hook in his Majesty's face." The Learned
Prelate then declared, that as he could not conrcientiously
vote against the Bill, being clearly of opinion that her Ma-
jesty was guilty, and as lie conk' not consistently vote for
tht Divorce Clause, his imp' ession with respect to that
Clause remaining unchanged, he should withdraw himself
from the I louse, and give no vote one way os the other.—
(A long li, and cries "Hu ar, hear!" and " Orik r !")
Earl G ROSVENOR said, it was impossible not to tres-
pass ill their Lordships to take notiee of v. hat had fallen
trent the Le:tined Prelate. If he recollected right, be had
!laced what was supposed to have passed between his Ma-
jesty mid his el iiiistet s—that there had been rumours, which
wire. fostered by Ministers, that the King had been the
math cause of the agitation of the question, and that his
Majesty Lad pri•posed the timissiou of the Queen's moue in
the Liturgy himself. lie (Len! ) had distinctly stated,
that such rumours tended to thiow odium and euntempt
upon the Crowd, and were in every respect nicked and ia-
yarious; er d he admitted that he hail tleclaied, tliet if he
were in the place of an Archbishop of Canter but v, to eisuen
such I prikosition was wade, he &hyoid out licsitate to

THE RATIONAL REGISTER

throw aside punctilio in the manner alluded to. (Hear,
hear). He acknowledged that he had also slated, that if
he was a Minister, he aould sooner trample gimlet foot tle;
seals of ellice than ititroduce a measure Cu obnoxious !
(Hear, hear, hear.) Ile should say no mote in auswer to
the censorious comments of the Learned Prelate, than de-
elate, that every tiling he heard more aid inure convinced
him of the impropriety—the absurdity of the n:ea•urc--
(Loud cries of " Question!" when the Noble Lord sat
down.)
Lind ERSKINE took the opportunity to notice the ar-
gument of the Noble Lord on the lA'oulsack, which was
grounded on the case of the murder( d man. The circum-
stances stated were certainly a strorg prestimptiuti of guilt,
but he begged to know what the slut y would have thought II
if the person brought forward to prove the murder, hail de-
clared in Court, that he hail seen neither the bloody knife
nor the murdered man?—(Hear, hear, hear.)--This was
the ease to which the present indeed might be compared,
for lie must assert that so complete a contradiction to the
statement of the Attorney-General had river been given,
than that wli.ch appeated all through the evidence fur the
prosecution, from tile mouths of the witnesses, nut wily in
cross-esatiettiabon, hilt in the direct examitiation of all the
evidence.—( I Tear, hear).
The Duke el GRAFTON said, that after having looked
with the greatest attention to the evidence for the Pill, and
particularly to that of Majucclii and De Mont, he must,
upon his honour and conscience, say, "Nut Guilty."—
(Loud cries of Mar, hear).
The Marquis of HUNTLEY said he wan as decidedly
convinced of the Queen's guilt, as the Noble Duke seemed
to he convinced of her innocence.—His Lordship was de-
termined not to give a silent tote, notwithstanding the
threats held out by Counsel at that Bar.
The Marquis of DONEGAL said, them were some pow-
erful contradictions to be found in the most essential parts
of the evidence. His vote should be against the Bill, as a
measure injurious to all parties, as well as to the best in-
terests of the nation.

The Bishop of Li LOUCESTrit said, the !louse not having
separated that most objectionable Clause trout the Bill, he
was compelled, by his conscientious feelings, to vote against
the third readiag of the Bill. (II mad cries of Hear). lie re-
gretted to be obliged to °mime many of duise with whom he
usually voted; but he was convinced tiutt cowisteuey uf con-
duct was the best security against misrepresentution.—(lhear.)
ard DA in\ LEY could not let the 41twstion go to their
I it d,hips, without appealing to thosewhohad before wavered
in their opinions a, to Um guilt of her Majesty, to stand be-
tween Ministers and rain! The muss of the Cu oats of
England would, he was convinced, resist, with all their fora•.
this iniquitous Bill, and other nations would view the conduct
of the Upper Muse of Parliament with the deepest emitempt.
Here there were loud cries of "Question"—Strangers were
then ordered to withdraw.

At t‘enty minutes iwst one o'clock the Ilouse divided on the
question, that this Lill be now mid a third time :
CONTENTS
NON-CONTENTS
••••••m•

Majority fur tht Third Reading
As soon as the maubers were at 1111 l towed, Lord DACIIE
rose amid very vehement cries of "Order," and ns surto as the
Peers had taken their seats, lie observed, that he had been
intrusted with a petition from het Alajesty, pray big to be
heard by counsel against the passing of the bill. (Much
cheering.)
Lord LIVERPOOL, on the question that the Bill do pass,
declared his conviction of the Queen's guilt; yet, with a
majority so small. and feeling how difficult it would be to im-
press conviction on the ptMlic mind, he should feel it his duty
lu propose, that the further proceedings on this Bill should he
postponed until this (lay six months. ('Flue must cehtnteut
cliceriog took place at this um:trete/I declaration.)
Earl (..iItEA rose as soon as the Earl of Liverpool had re-
sumed his seat, but the confusioa did not subside Wild after
his lordship had been for some time on his legs. liis lordship
complained of the whole mouse ministers had pursued with
regard to the bill, which, after the declaration of the noble
earl, could scarcely be said to be bt fore the house, but which
was still before the country, and would long live in its memory.
(Hear). Ile charged the servauts of the crown with the
grossest neglect of duty, in the first instance, in listening
only to crporte evidence, mid giving a willing credence to
the most evargeertited and unfutintleil calumnies. (Loud cheers.)
They had thus for many months twit:tied the nation—they had
produced a general stagnation of public rend private business—
and tiny haul given a most faxottrable opportunity, were it
desired, to the enemies of internal peace and tranquillity.
They had hurt ray ed their King, insulted their (pleen, (con-
Cooed erica of hear front all sales), and had given a shock to
the al, of society by the promulgation of the detestable
nod disgusting centrism, in the bearing of which the house
had been so long occupied. (]fear.) His lordship also repro-
I attal in the severest terms the conduct of the Ilitan commis-
sioners, alto having been appointed, not to investigate truth,
but to obtain testimony of guilt, had found in this count.) but
t,o great an hiclination to put faith in all the stories their
agents and *inn ses might invent against the honour and re-
putation of the Queen of Great Britaut. Ihe result had been
that, alter itiquitit 5. seet.et and open—after the grossest mi-
lli:tut:et and the foulest wls laid been made the subject of
detail and dehate Mr :id days—after all the injury that it sits
possible to do the Queen had been accomplished, the bill was
abatelotted, nut without teaslit, but assuredly without apology.
Ids lordship concluded by assuring ruble lords on the other
side, that the prople of tireat Britain would not he satisfied
with the mere witherawing of the inewme, but would de-
mand a strict inetary into its fUlilitL4iiUll 1111t1 origin. (Orrin ,
eiweriug,)
lord I:RSIiINE followed Earl Grey, and expressed the
delight he f that, after all that bad been threatened and
pe.turined, lw had set at Icngiln lived to sue justice—tartly aad
relactant justice—done to the Queen. It was the victory of
right and inetticetwe user w thug and malignity. Ile bad spent
much of his lite in courts of justice, nod he had often witnessed
the triumph of the lass,but never so gloriously 4slglthe rest tit
eetasion— the triumph of that law of which Ilts.ker, in his
Vccicviastical l'aity, said, "Of Law tluire can be 1111 It'sS ac-
knowledged than that her seal is slur bosom id (iud, :we voice
the haniatny of the amid. All things in lica en and on catth
du her homage; the very least as feeling her cure, 111111 the
greatest as not exempted from her power. Ituth Imp Is and
men, and creatures of what condition seever, though uhcli in
different tort and rammer, yet all with anthem conwitt atdnrir
illg 11l r its the her Ili their peace and joy." (Bear, lie tr.)
lite Duke of 1 11ONTROSE took the typos Inutity of stating
that his conviction of the criminality of her Majesty was lanai:
ten it, and that Lot one, be should ticker luck up to her as his
Qutt n.

367

The question was then put from the woolsack, on the mo-
tion of the Earl of LI VF.N POOL that the question " that this
hill do piss" be put on this day six months. It was carried
wenrine contruelico nte, and alinim by artlanialion.
Order having heel' once more re-establi,hed, the Earl of
Live It ig),/f, aimed that the Ilouse should adjourn until the
23d of November, that day on which the Commons meet. It
was also carried, and their Lordships immediately separated.

CONIENT4 ON THE THIR D R E•DING.
Duxes.—York, Clarence, Beaufort, Newcastle, Rutland,
Wellington, and Nurthotoulmorlaud.
t isss Cony A nglesea, Caliph to, Nor-
thampton, Exeter, Jleadfurt, Cornwallis, Buckingham, Lo-
thiao, Clomensberty, and Wincla stet..
1:1n1.5.--St.Gertuains, Whitworth, Yendaso, Cathcart,
Midway e, Orford, Nl:lowers, Rosse, Nelson, l'ow is, Limerick,
Diniaugh more, Belmore, Maya, Longford, Mount-Cashel.
Kingston, Liverpool, Dighy, .Mount-Falgeconob, Strange,
(Athol) Abergarenny, Ailesboiry, Bathurst, Chatham, Har-
court and West onorland, C. P. S.
VI .COU Nrs.—ENlnutith, Lake, Sidmouth, Melville,-Cur-
zon, Sydney, and Hereford.
lt. B oiszs —Harris, Russ (Glasgow), Meidrum (Aboyne)
Hill, Coant.eronere, Hopetauts, Manners, Ailsa • (Cassilis),
Lauderdale, Sheiliehl, Redesdale, St. Helens, Noo thwick,
Bolton, Carrington, De Dintstameiile, ROll9, Saltersford
(Courtowill, Stewart (Galloway), Stewart (Moray), Douglas
(Alm foto), Grenville, Suffield, Itlontagu, Gordon (Huntley),
Somers, Rodney, 'Middleton, Napier, Colville, Gray, Sal-
twin, Forbes and F.lolon.
A nen Rl9lloP.—Canterbury.
lit su a tis.—Cark and Ross, Llandaff. Peterhorough, F'
St. David's, Worcester, St. Asaph, and Landon.

NON-CONTENTS.
KEs —Portland, Brandon, Devonshire', Berk- -
ton, Richmond, Somerset, and Gloucester.
Ala it u ss s.—Path, Stallitrd, and lur
EA i.s.—Allwmiiiie, Blesington, Bradt.
Grey, Go.ford, Itonitley, Roslyn. Caluo
Girrick, Citiootson, AllatiAchl
(Dounshirt.), tirtc•venor, 1)e Lae•
Fit-milli:on, Portsmouth, St
Oxford, Ito‘rbert, Jersey, Es"
and De. by.
VtsrnuxTs--Anwnt, (if
Torrington, Falmouth, an
BA ItO I UM
Ils
dir, Caltliorttp, Dawn
selsea, Mendip (Clio
(1)onektl), Amherst, 1
horton, Itagot, W 4lSin
ith_e (.Irg II), Dos
Grantham, King, 11.4
Scle, Howard, 1)e k
De Clithird.
Auctintstiors.—Y
13,5it0p--Cilmesto
Couteuts 10t1 I No
FROM T (.71

J. Wright, senior, art
Solicitor, Mr. Patu.n, Hatton Gana
G. Trent, Botirum, Dorset, malts."...
and Dixon, St. Switiiin's I.anc.
F. W. Wragge, Gliatcmter, dealer. Si.JA
Ilraikemidge, Bartlett's Huild;ngs, Ilolbern.
J. C. Scawimi and F. Grosjean, Soho &pr.:re, harp
turcrs. Sol% 3/emi,. Jones and liland, Great Marylehone Sta..
P. Watkins, Bri,tol, oilman. Sols 3lessrs. llurd and John.

•
son, Tenip!e.
T. Wt.:Ali-en, Andover, Soutlunoton, linen draper. Soli. -
Atessrs. lire:midges and Iltirtn, Dyer's Buildings, I lolborn.
T. Atitby, East Street, Alaneliester square, baker. Sols.
Ale,:srs. !hates and Wilson, Lincoln's Inn Fields.
W. Cooper, Fleet Market, linen draper. Sols. Messrs. Dares
and Chunield„ Angel Court, Throginorron Street.
J. kenwortity, Saddleworth, Yorkshire, oyer. Sol. Mr. Bat-
tyc, Chancery Lane.
W. Fromow, Great Yarmouth, druggist. Sols. Messrs. Pools
and Grectilield, (ray's Inn Square.
W. Yates, Manchester, cotton twist and weft dealer. Sols.
Messrs. Ali'ne and Parry, Temple.
A. IVilkinson, Liverpool, wine merchant. Sols. Messrs.
lilackstotk and Bunce, Temple.
S. Trthaue, Exeter, silversmith. Sul. Mr. Brutton, Old
Broad Street.

T. Noais, Bi,hor.-tone, Wilts, shoemaker. Sots. Messrs
Milieu and Co. Alitlua: Temple Lane.
DIVIDEND:.

Nov. 2S, 11. and .1. Doilsen, Three 'fun Court, Southwark, •
hop trietors-28, It. Coilens, Maidstone, hop dealer-2A, T.
Phillips, Bread Street Hill, niercharit—•:B, 1. Lianas, White
I Lorse Inn, Fetter Lane, tavern keeper-13, J. Ilturnion,
Lincolnyldrc, timber niereliant-28, Holmes, .1. Harris, and
J. D. English, Long Acre, coaeliniakers-14, J. Townsend.
Ludgate Street, warehouseman-29, E. New. Bristol, banker-
-28, H. Buckton, Jentiyii Street, St. James's, working jeweller-
2H, NVard, Maiden Lane, liattlebuilhe, mustard menu.
fact urer—l 4, F. fotlionier, Corporation How, Clerkenwell,
distiller-28, it. Callen and J. Pears, Cheapside, lactors—t9, T.
W. and T. Gardiner, Leicester, hosiers-28. C. ShoLeidge,
liensing,ton. draper-2;4, W. lii,litou, St. Peter's Hill. what.,
bone wereilant—Dee. I. E. M. Carey, Liverpcol, merchant—',
11. Deaver, Liverpool, ineichant-2, I'. Evans, Cross Street,
Goswell S,trect, brandy merchant-2, J. ll.mcock, Lirnehoir.e.
Hole Stairs, mast maker-4, W. Mole, Worcester, and
Lockett, Hcretiard, carriers--i 6, J. Wilson, Old Broad Street,
.merchant-20, C. Evans and Sir J. Jett; knight, Gioneester,
bankers-13. %V. 14 otyer.'renbt:ry, Worcestershire, nialtster.
CE url FICA'fES to be granted Nov. 21.
E. Crabb, Beckington, Somersetshire, clot:her—W. Parks:.
Birmingham, lime dealer—T. Summer:told, Bristol, iron tounder
—J. Greaves, Queriihill. Vorks!irre, fancy cloth maotd'acturers—
.l. Cook, 11.11usly, YorkAire, itivreinart—f. Russian, Bath,
marchalit.

The Rev. A. C. 14:11en, Rector of %Vona.= Mon.
timer, Essex, ut his late tithe niekting, took only at
tke rate of (is. no acreolthough be had, by the coinp
mon assent of his parishion,:rs, been accustomed to
receive 7s. We hope that this liberal example will
le fuliowed by those who have it in their power, by
individual sacrifice, to relieve the td:nrese,:nfinany.

!Jr. Joint laic, of Richmond, rraluced in the
Ina&Let ,a'Saturary last, for sale, a Scotch cabbage,
weighing 471bs. and coveting r :Taw of live feet.

-
11111.11111111=miliimila