The National Register.
London, England, 1822-06-09 00:00:00

43aritaintnt.

IIOU'E OF LORDS.
MONDAY, J t7N 5.
• The Earl of DONO..G II MO.IE tuok die oaths and his seat
as Vise wit I! etch anon.
Pe.mtnis ikeeinst the Catholic Peers' Bill were presented ftom
Bath, sat inn, Witte, Leieesterthire, and the Clergy of Killala.
Petitions complainin, ors agricultural distress were presented
from Norfolk, Suliillic,"Cirencester, and Kent.
Petitions, praying for a revision of the criminal code, were
presented nom Wellington. Bralmin, Maidstone, and Fiume,
treuinersetshire.) The above petitions were laid on the table.
The Kohut LIMERICK moved there consideration of Doye's
Divince Bill.
Atter oitue conversation upon the subject of securing ;0001.
stock w lady Vovle, which she received trout an aunt.
The LORD 211 AN CIS'. LOR imiulated that he should
secure the interest which that lady ought to have, when the bill
is read the third time. The report was then received.
r. Jenner, front the eounnibsioners fur building new churches,
yresesited an account of their charges and expellees, incurred
within given (1416—The House then adjourned.
TUESDAY, JUNI.
Sir James Graham, and other members from the Commons,
Li aught up the Greenwich Chinch Bill, the ary .le-botte
winch awl Light Bull, and several others. which were read the
tro. time.
Tile Carl of HAREWOOD presented a petition from New -
Ci•lie, against the Roman Catkolic Peers' Bill.
Load eIDNIOUT II presented a shinier petition.
leer sC I: I ELIO presented a petition trout the Hundred of
Greeultoe, in Norfolk, complaining of agricultural distress, and
preying fur parliamentary reform. Tee petition complained,
among otter strong expneelons, die following A large mini.
tarp force is kept up, with no other object truth to suppress the
rjghte ot the people. and destroy the constitution."
The LORD CIiA.NCELL9it cone lathed of the indecent
manner in which the petition was worded, and observed, that
the only way to make a petition inefficacious. was to put in it
trims disrespectful to the House. It was not possible hie Lords
could receive the petition just presented, and the noble and
leamod Lord moved that it be rejected.
Lead SUFI 'ELI) concurred in the observations made by the
Lead On/steelier, so far us related to the respect which was due
to the House; but said, so long as he had a seat in Perliament,
he should present petitions which did not appear to convey any
intentional indecorum. The petitioners had perhaps been led by
their ticelings to address improper language to die House, but it
did hot strike him that any disrespect was intended. The pen.
ben was 'ejected.
The Marquis of LANSDOWNE presented a petition from
two poisons re.i.iug at Dorking, on the subject ot it new inven •
tion in the tanning of hides.. The petition was bud ou the table.
The House adjourned.
wynXESDAY, JUNE B.
Petitions against die Catholic Peers' Bill were presented from
the clergy of iiereiurd, and the ovedulders and unnibitaats of
Peckham.
Gen. CASGOINE, and other members (rem the Commons,
brought tti• a private bill, which was read tree find time.
Au accoutit of the number of beast, and sheep sold in Smith-
field market since I.;LXI, was presented aoeording to an order of
the 1{1.4.13e.
Lind SUFFIELD presented petitions from Somersetshire,
Lewes, Gainsburuukla, Sheroorue, and other place, praying fur
revision of the criminel code. The above were bore ally read,
and laid on the table.
The Sheriff's Dz.mte Bill was rend the second time.
Lord SUFFIEL.D moved the second reading of the Vagrant
11111, which was accordingly read die second time and comitimed
for r>lllllilOW.
Lord DARN LEY pointed oat a part of the Bill which he con-
sidered oojectionable.
Lard MELVILLE said, the machinery of the Bill was wholly
inapplicable to the nurtheo parts ‘ll the kingdoin.—Adjaurnal.
Tett: asnaY. JVJE 6.
The Marquis CA:IIIIJCN presentee two petitions against the •
Catholic Pears Biti; one hum Caatetbury, and the other titan
Tenterden.
The Bishop of St. DAVID'S presented three petitions from
his Diocese, toiling the same object.
The Earl of SHAFTESBURY presented a petition from the
congregation of the gospel clutch at Pomace. Nona We above
mentioned bill.
l'ltepetitions were severally read, and laid on the table.
Mr. Wallace, and several members from the Commons,
brought up duce bills, via. the Navigation Laws Amendment
till; the Ancient Commercial Statutes Repeal bill; and the
Colonial Trade hill. which were read the first time.
On the motion of the Earl of LIVERPOOL. the second
reading of the Navigation bill was Axed for Timidity.
Lunt SUFI:IP:LI-I put drill° eanimittee on the Vagrant Lawa
bill, which stood tCr this day, until toonorrote.
The /mute then adjourned.
FRIDAY, ICNE7.
Lord EGMONT took the oaths and his seat.
Mr. Tomlins presented an account of the bullion issued by the
Bank to the Treasury, from Pelt, to the ptesent time.
Mr. Irving, Irvin the Ceatunis. preseeted an account of the
corn imported since the opening of tl.e ports..
Lord CLIPDEN presented a petition from the spirit dialers
afailkenny, complaining of illicit distillation, anti praying relief.
The petition was recd and lain cm the table.
Versitasfr BILL.—On the motion of Lord SUFFIELD, the
fleece w; .t into a committee on the Vagrant Laws' Dim The
The noble Leal, in the committee ptupotod several veinal
amendments.
Lord MELVILLE opposed the bill, on the ground. that it
slid not apply to Scotland. The nobie Viscount stated that he
sboald naive to insert a clause on the third reacting of the bill.
The Earl of SHAFTESBURY reported the but to the House.
The Duke of ,NEwcasTLE presented a petition from the
town of Mansfield against the Catholic Peers Bill. The petition
W 43 signed by 1250 persons. Tne noble Loru observed that the
eyes ot rile cuunny were open on the subject of the bill before the
House. With respect to his own county, he could state that
hostility to the bill existed to a great degree, and was increasing;
they were well aware of the evil consequences of a bill which the
nation justly considered odious. He expressed a hope that it
merle: be rejected by a numerous majority. It would be impel,-
table for him to attend toe discussion; that circa:mu:nee gave
emu great mortification, and he was induced on that account to
c vices his opposition to the bill. The petition was read and
laid on the table.
Lord HOLLAND did not object to the petition ; he was how-
ever, pervaded, that whether the Noble Duke attended in Par-
Brunet,' 'mon the distention of the bill ot not, die opinions of the
noble Doke would be the same. He objected to a statement
oracle by the nobie Hake, namely, that the bill was a violation
of the contaitution. It was to cestore the ancient constitution of
the country. It was to remove a hurdler' pieced on the Lords
Lao years age. When he heard such a description by a noble-
man of tank and influence, he was obliged to say it was not a
Irue description.
Petitions against the Catholit Peen' Bill were also presented
from Newark, Nottingluen, Toatielel, Sutton, Ashlield, tool
other places.
The Marquis of LANSDOWNE gave notice, that he should
move the second reading ot the Nlienortughter Bill on Monday.
Tue. BISALOP kETE.1501101.1411.-1-ord DACE!; pre-
sented a petition from the Bev. Mr. Gritushaw, rector of llunon
Latimer, ru the comity of Nottiegbann complaining of the =roe