The Sun.
London, England, 1855-05-25 00:00:00

despoil of her territories, push her back to the north, and
reconstruct, in short, the map of Europe. If there were
a young Miuister full of genius and energy, backed by the
enthusiasm of the people, unembarrassed by any public
debt, and fortunate enough to possess as a colleague a
general, young, energetic, and able as himself, I do not
say that that is not a career which I should recommend
to his attention. I do not presume to predict what the
result of such a struggle would be, but I think few will
deny that the hair of the youngest member present would
grow grey before its termination arrived. There is an-
other mode of waging war with Russia—an essentially
protective mode. In adopting that mode your object
would be to protect your ally, to take care that her terri-
tory was not violated, that her fortresses were secure, and
to check the preponderance of Russia by increasing the
power of Turkey. That was the war in which, from your
declarations at its commencement, I thought we had em-
barked But what have you done? Having embarked in
a war to protect the Turkish empire, you suddenly re-
solved to invade the Russian dominions—(hear,' hear)—
and while you were iprotecting Turkey you engaged in
diplomatic transactions which were to carry out a protec-
tive policy. You have thus combined, therefore, an ag-
gressive war with a protective diplomacy; and to this
Incoherent, inconsistent union I trace and attribute the
dangers which are surrounding us, and which, in my opi-
nion, unless you terminate that union, must increase
until they perhaps overwhelm you. A Conference at
Vienna may cope with such questions as the government
of the Danubian Principalities, as to the course and free
navigation of a river, or as the security of the rights of
the Christian subjects of the Parte. But Conferences
at Vienna cannot cope with such subjects as the invasion
of Russian provinces, the destruction of Russian fortresses,
or the fortunes of accumulated hosts on the sterile terri-
tory of a proud foe. (Hear hear.) While, therefore, you
are wasting your time at Vienna in this protective diplo-
macy, all that you can do is to devise schemes which will
apply to the objects of the war. But the aril consequences
upon the objects of aggressive war are easily traceable, be-
cause by these conferences and this morbid diplomacy you
not only check and destroy the rpirit of the nation, upon
which, after all, you must rely, but by these very confer-
ences you are paralysing your allies, and preventing that
energy and exertion on the part of the European Powers
which may be necessary for you to carry on your aggres-
sive warfare, and to extricate you from the dangers which
you must meet. (Hear, hear.) Sir, it mey have been a
great error—as 1: frankly confess I believe that it has been
—to depart from the protection of the Turkish empire to
undertake that invasion of Russia which you most rashly
and, as I think, thoughtlessly decided upon; but, having
once entered upon that course, you must now meet the
consequences of the fatal policy you have pursued. You
cannot, however, extricate yourselves from these conse-
quences by conferences at Vienna. (Hear.) You will only
increase your difficulties and augment your dangers if
you trust to diplomacy. Your position is one that is en-
tirely deceptive ; and you never can carry on war with
success unless, on the one hand, you are supported by an
enthusiastic people, and unless, on the other, you can count
upon allies—if you have allies—who know that you are
determined to support them. I have said, sir, that there
was at least one object in my making this motion—not a
solitary, but a main object—viz., that I want the House of
Commons, by its vote to-night—l want those who are the
most favourable to peace, provided, I suppose, that it is
made upon honourable terms, and is likely to be permanent
—for I trust that no hon. member would advocate any
other kind of peace—l want this house, by its decision, to
put an end to that vicious double system by which we have
so long carried on an aggressive war and a protective diplo-
macy. I want the House of Commons to-night to say in
distinct language that the time for negotiation has passed.
No man, I think, will be inclined to deny that proposition
who has read Count Nesselrode's circular. If I thought
that there was even a chance of obtaining an honourable
peace and of extricating this country from the difficulties
by means of negotiations, I might still have the weakness
to cling to it ; but I am convinced that further negotia-
tions, instead of securing a peace, will only aggravate the
dangers and distresses of the war. lam confident that, if
negotiations are continued, the Government may be pre-
vented, indeed, from making a disgraceful peace by the
still latent spirit of England, but the Government, if it
persists in its present policy, will only substitute for such
a peace a lingering, fruitless, and inglorious war. I ask
the House, therefore, to support this motion, because one
of its main objects is to put an end to this fatal union be-
tween diplomacy and aggressive war. Sir, it has been said
that the motion which I um about to make expresses a
distrust of her Majesty's Government. Be it so. Is there
any man out of this house who does not feel a distrust of
her Majesty's Government ? (Hear.) I beg the noble lord
to, understand that Ido not say this by way of taunt. I
know full well—and it is a most sorrowful thing—that this
distrust is not limited to her Majesty's Government ; and
that it has been occasioned by the policy of this country
for the last two years. That distrust reaches our generals,
although they are victorious —it reaches our officers,
' although during this war they have achieved deeds of un-
precedented valour, and maintained among their troops
unexampled discipline—(hear)—it reaches our aristocracy,
although they have poured out their blood' ike water in the
conflict. (Hear.) Amid the dark suspicions that have,
alas, been rife, that distrust has even reached the prac-
tical working of our administrative system ; and will
you, then, hesitate to support me tonight in this
the first effort to breathe some feeling of life into this
House, in the dangerous circumstances in which, be-
lieve me, the House of Commons is placed? (Hear, hear.)
Further forbearance on our part cannot be submitted to by
our constituents. I speak frankly ; I say that silence is
by them considered to be an abnegation of our functions.
(Hear.) Yon must say "Ay" or "No" to this motion.
I cannot believe that you will allow any miserable amend-
ments to evade the issue which I am going to place before
the House of Commons. (Cheers.) Tbat issue is this :
" Will you put an end to this diplomatic subterfuge, and
this Ministerial trifling ?" and it will be so looked upon, I
believe, here and elsewhere. I find, sir, that a right hon.
gentleman has( done are the honour of adopting five lines
of my composition. (A. laugh.) I must congratulate the
present Ministry upon its good fortune in always having
a Privy Councillor to rush to its aid ; and certainly it
ought to be a wise Government that has so many amateur
and veteran colleagues. (Laughter.) I read that Sir F.
Baring is to move an amendment to my motion in these
terms :—"That this house, having seen with regret that
the conferences of Vienna have not led to a termination of
hostilities, feels it to be a duty to declare that it will con-
tinue to give every support to her Majesty in the prosecu-
tion of the war, until her Majesty shall, in conjunction
with her allies, obtain for this country a safe and Ifonour-
able peace." The latter portion of this amendment is
taken from the words of my motion. Is this the amend-
ment of the Ministry? If it is their amendment, it is an
act on the part of the Ministry which vindicates to a cer-
tain degree the course I have taken, and in every sense
condemns themselves. (Hear, hear.) If the noble lord and
his colleagues think. that this house ought, in the present
stat of affairs, in consequence of the failure of these nego-
tiations, to express their determination to support her
Majesty in the manner I have eescribed, how can the no-
ble lord reconcile it to himself that he did not himself,
like a loyal Minister of the Crown—(hear, hom)—come
forward and propose an address thanking her Majesty
for the papers which she has so graciously placed on our
table? I can hardly recall the passage, but I remember
reading of an example in the history this countrywhich
the noble lord the First Minister might well study in re-
gard to communications of this nature proceeding from
the Sovereign. It is to be found in " Cox's Life of Sir
Robert Walpole," where it is stated that the Duke of
Newcastle, then Secretary of State, brought down papers
relating tothe threatened invasion of England, and laid
them on the table of the House of Lords, by Royal com-
mand. In consequence of some papers mettle same subject
having been previously laid on the table, and the Crown
having been addressed in regard to them, the Duke of
Newcastle said it was not necessary a second time to ad-
dress the Sovereign. I can remember the spirit if I can-
not repeat the words of Sir Robert Walpole on that occa-
sion, when he made the only speech' he ever delivered as
Earl of Orford :—" My lords," I think he said, " is the
English language so barren that we c oanot find words to
express our gratitude to his Majesty for every act of grace
and condescension to this assembly ' And, continuing in
this strain, he so shamed the Ministry that, although the
Government party had a great majority in the House of
Peers, that august assembly rose almost in a body and
decided that it should address the Monarch ; while the
Prince of Wales, who was then in Opposition, although
he had not been for some time on speaking terms
with Lord Orford, warmly embraced that nobleman,
and, addressing him, exclaimed, " From this moment
we are friends. I feel that you have vindicated
the honour of the Crown and represented the feeling of the
country." (Hear.) Well, then, here is this amendment
of the right hon. gentleman (Sir F. Baring). Is it the
amendment of the Government ? Will. they have courage
to support this amendment? If they have, it is possible
they may yet take Sebastopol —(hear, and laughter from
the Opposition)—for a more audacious act was never per-
petrated in this country. (A laugh.) I wish to impress
upon the house the difference between my motion and the
shabby amendment—(laughter)—that has been oribbed
from my thoughts and clothed in my stolen language.
(Laughter.) What is the difference between them? It
is this—both the motion and the amendment contain the
assurance which I am sure hon. gentlemen on all sides will
feel it their duty to proffer to the Crown, of their determis
nation to support her Majesty in the war in which we are
engaged—(cheers)-- but in the amendment there is an omis•
sion of those words, which, if they be adopted, will ring
through England to-morrow, and will gladden the heart of
many a patriot who is now discontented, when he finds
that the House of. Commons have come to the issue I have
just described, and have decided by their vote to-night
that there shall be an end to diplomatic .subterfuge and
Ministerial trifling. (Loud cheers.)
Mr. BARROW, in seconding the motion, expressed his
concurrence with the right hon. member for Buckingham-
shire in the opinion that the negotiations in progress at
Vienna were inconsistent with the continuance of the war,
and his belief that a large majority of the people of this
country were anxious that the suspense existing with respect
to those negotiations should-be terminated. Me was fully
alive to the deplorable consequences of war—to the misery
which it inflicted upon private families, and to its injurious
effect upon the commerce and the general interests of the
country ; but it was because he entertained this feeling so
strongly that he was anxious to impress upon the house the
necessity of a vigorous prosecution of the war as the only
means of obtaining a secure and honourable peace . He was
satisfied that such a war as was now waged between great
and powerful nations would not be brought to a satisfactory
termination so long as any irresolution was exhibited pn
the part of her Majesty's Government. He remembered
the hollow truce—the peace of Amiens—which for a short
period interrupted the war that was carried on at the com-
mencement of the present century, and he had no desire to
see such an expeeiment repeated.
The question having been put by the SPZISEB,
Sir F. BARING said that, notwithstanding the formid-
able language of the right hon. member for Buckingham-
shire, he was not at all inclined to shrink from proposing
the amendment of which he had given notice. Indeed,
the right hon. gentleman's speech had convinced him of
the propriety of submitting such an amendment to the
house, for that speech plainly disclosed the intention which
he believed had lurked under the right hon. gentleman's
motion. He (Sir F. Baring) would, in the first place,
state the reasons which had induced him to steal the lan-
guage of the right hon. gentleman. (A. laugh.) He heel
concurred in the views expressed in that house by the no-
ble lord at the head of the Government, that until the
final and formal close of the conferences at Vienna, there
was no necessity for the expression of any opinion on the
part of the house with reference to the negotiations ; but
the state of affairs was entirely altered when the right hon.
gentleman's notice appeared upon the paper. The house
was there compelled to pronounce an opinion .of some kind
or other, and the right hon. gentleman, with his usual
dexterity, had combined an address to the Crown with an
attack upon the Government. After the right hon.
gentleman had laid upon the table a proposal to address
her Majesty, stating in proper terms and language, that
Parliament was prepared to support her Majesty until a
just and.honourable peace had been obtained, it was im-
possible to meet. such a proposition with a direct nega-
tiTe, Hon, gentleman mud remember that their discussions

,

----.--_-......--...-----.---------"-
a ;( the
were not merely for England, but for EuroPe• no" •_ to •
Proposal of the right hon. gentlenian fur an address , ,
the Crown had been met with e direct negative, it inoret
have been supposed out of doors, at all events in
.!,.!
countries, that that house was not prepared to to
Majesty in carrying ou the war. Wel:, he stole tits rigor
hon. gentleman's words, and he committed thet larceny
because he was anxious it should go forth to Europe that
pect to the proposal for an address, bn ._
twojetrherwesas no doubt or difficulty whatever in ttlitabtathgeoe.
gentleman on both sides were ready to concur in addreSl
her Majesty in the same words. He freely owned theta-IFe
language of the right hon. gentleman with respect t_ the
address seemed to him the most convenient he could ad_ello.t•
for it was free from any ambiguity ; but the right_ hon,
for
gentlemanal. was mistaken if he supposed that he 001
.....rn.
Lin) was
not
prepared to meet the remaining aud es°
Tb©r ht hon.
part of his motion directly and frankly. To rig f
gentleman had gone into a long narrative of the historyoc_
these transactions, into which it was impossible to foll w
him. The right hon gentleman ha,d attacked acts and tic!.
gotiatlone of the- Government, with reference to whiciti.
papers had already been laid upon the table, and such $
..
tacks would doubtless be met by those who' had been en-
tacks
gaged in the transactions, ana who alonewere able tr°lntehe
some of the right hon. gentleman's assertions. Bat lf
ight hon. gentleman believed there was reason for suchiv_
grave charges against her Majesty's GOVOWlllent, be
and ii;
surprised the right hen. gentleman had not frankly
i
fairly brought those charges before. the house, ins'no
mixing them up with what appeared t' him-to steely'
..,
right hon, gentleman's own expression-to be a °±7..
tleshabby" resolution. A great part of the right the
rcan's speech consisted of an attack upon the ° a.
adopted by the noble lord (Lord J. E,ussell) iii the Vor,T..
conferences. That was undaribtrelly a fair subject f ci''.
cussion ; but why did not the rightgentleman, in
stead of contenting himself with attacking they noble lortl,l.
conduct in his speech, in what appeared m (Sir F.
Baring) ambiguous and unsatisfactory terms, bring.ow;
question fairly before the house by, a bpd
reoluti ,110..'
(Hear.) The right hon. gentleman had chop(' the
_-.'„,
vernmenta with unsatisfactory conduct and with *7.l"erit,
ambiguous lanuae with regard to the negotiation! v'ol7:lit
were not yet concluded; and he (Sir ,F. Baing) tu 1:;ht
that was a point to which the attentfon of the house o :,.
to be directed. This involved a very considerable eon
,D:b
tutionalr question, and one which was of importance !!'ei.
reference to the transaction of the grea dip.loma ?;'.,,,,
ness of the country. As he read the consttution.?l_ 7-0,.
gvcountry,.wanhltugniilietst
taibe given
admittinge:int wftowihrr aeernsreittoigohtoheetwthtwoaerfsaa
rntehasexecutivealescohotnoitotu rnhsosees otLit
entrusted,
e aiS r o
ww
hn i
io that p e t Thir
re: ctthl re
.I_•!paitting the entire right of Parliament to canon draw
give to o
et the housew without
bsouucth
from_ Ministry while negotiathtido:unawtsyietwill°oedrsfreeadtioisgritth4lo;dc,,,,,;zikefucetdoos
injury to gcoivt or
thought that the house should not, either by an/ did eot•
indirect resolution, state that the Ministry that ',sees
from day to day, inform them of what was goiog (Is to-
wing ambiguous language or that their conduct 11 of his
satisactory. (Hear.) That had been the answer
_.nfo.ir
pforobniiiotis
noble and right hon. friends ? Had there been sill
rteas
concealment or any ambiguous language? 'When b 0
understood that the conference was suspended,.bat too,
suspended was not closed, and that the Austria' ?ed, but
niereviteiced:ril:ect. be
ment did not conssde; that every effort was alia'lls aetillS
was of opinion that means might still be found of wensioa
theo difficulty which had caused the temporal su5P code-
c. the sittings, his noble friend told them that the 11 in •
rence was suspended, but that negotiations werew'se net
progress, and that of course, while in progreis, it eothillg
possible for that house to ask and to be told dell', eon
respecting those negotiations. Was it possible'ls
while negotiations were going forward on a nalltteri.ftbeig
vadatveorlsifaerletsoacoadrryallthtbeme
woonrwidithwearneywhoapedeosof scintir:il.
,:cloo:ibtibo
what was taking place ? (Hear, hear.) Was '" boortv
heardrnent bo werehon.
gentlemen willingto
smakeay, leta
o a treaty.kowllteb
obi, 'doe „it:ion; they could ask to be told the terms on which the
nrre:teidol:
which you will consent to makehot irioa of tb°
think it was in accordance either with the prinelP t boll°
constitution or the good conduct of affairs that ths, pia
should ask for information on everything,that Ilh"ot WI
forward. When they, moreover, came to eobsider3h sell
were not negotiating alone, but with AI with
e, $°
they were by arrangements bound to coinlnc°l-decisil
not, he apprehended, to propound an ultimate poot,o •
without such a communication with the Goveritie tern)*
France, with which they were on mesonintirnswe prig'
shouldtreference(taftyrtaahhsohahnsneoirbeeedrubnitedehiwehFodiiiifueffithis.
uepenehwßelvxunticuoer
yoparoi
fighting the same battles, and acting the 55,... die,
miles, was it fair and just to their Allies that eyf'eoerth's
for to that it would come-the Government of tbl'oiotio
ecslifetithereffd
which must he made to it? (Hear, hear.) he: use I
conceived that his noble friend had given ti" cob0111(1.ei;
f
opuieehtrnnreier:btefdgihohehadoadarr,edetlanumerniima,dnt
yadreratgaoe)retti_ignmoidhosoadoesfebearnsuntdtdut.hdhwwoteewl tedeboawtioupriatni
ssenerrchsheihteoditesiensintsgbibeift
us t
el nouseeof:sabot
otrogn:le:r3
rot
los': .coarsen
oir 0
eg lopliciewor
00,:f
oeof:
ovt.osrichip
es sobrtile:cloves.croor
icieet
ei
;:::
France and Austria, with the view of rneetlpg'" ell eile
or,l
on the other hand, had abandoned all 110PeSjo 00,00
utdltenuorntohusiysfltseahodeee
_thtlgyrwhatlatm)noebhaehiaies
butceipeihit
mttoa wishes
e
news
sth; eheinwtearsesgtooinfgpteoa ese,aynfootrhtihnge
nceo:lBdra.Dbegne oos°_%ll•ooiettliii? ,153..
impatience of the country. The right bons b 0'
eluded by moving as an amendment- I te.e.`-4 ilif;oesli,
..e " That this house, having seen with regr.° 0000 tote,
e rencees of Vienna have not led to a tern:ll.o,4 000,00 o/
titihoteigeiwsv,aefre,elsit to bo a duty to declare that it"..„ooot/ Der
every support to her Majesty in thoenoPtEsoobie'epeitibrie?'
until her Majesty shall, in conj
Allies, obtain for this country a Ede and hene'io coliciferg
Sir W. HEATHCOTE said that, althoug? ho 1/01 :le. t°
nowao bring forward the amendment of whicn ot IP-000
lids rveosteel
witht i
htionia_ogar(
sotice.), he would state the reasons which ieditionel l'eiglio
hiss. geintleman the member for Buckinghs`"a entireee"eil''
of which
it to the house. There were two resole. The I. 00
hon. gentleman
he was required to give his assetbire• blie t'l
cote) sohouh
eech, had made it imp •• le that be Flfar frloot
siring to shut the *oos be PCLfte
door to future negotiate :,ieb AP 1 1-
anxiou to see the thread taken up broken " iffeer.iript
to have8 been somewhat abruptly brok. 'of tbe tli°
then had to consider whether the resolution a froloo,o
hrion. baronet expressed his opinion. dreto /00)
ght hon. harone2e speech that he intendee, geath,fo"o
very much the same meaning ohe (Sir " their; if
wished to see embodied in the resolution, 01'" tett) t"toocie
sheiaebtare)l-tebnetc:::: W,::: 601°'
hoped the right hon. baronet would not obilatiee 5,", el
troduction of his amendment; but, as the 'le ofchslills
t seemed to him to be somewhat open t° t rid or`
ambiguity and uncertainty. In order to fe,_,„ the. 1 tbe
,objection,. he should propose to insert alate's'iro tOstoer
hostilities," " and still cherishing the „jet) st,otios
communications which are in progress naal ''''' ity i 0 ' 011'
cessful issue,".Sec. He should have no dilfe° 0000 aeo
against the resolutionpetlet ~id
of the right 10°' gen- k- ll'°'"
Disraeli), •
or in favour,of that of the light Inesott 0:0
(Sir F. Baling), if the latter right hon. ge4o benusee Or
amend it to the extent he recommended. ' OO tile °_.ll''
no doubt unanim • •t lf to carry old - sor
ous in pledging ise _so eo reo
with vigour t,' un il a safe and honotarable Pot so esP
tamed, and he rejoiced that this sentiment I/ bad
in both the resolutions. (Hear, hear.) a 01%00'
Mr. K. SEYMER confessed to be one of tee-right, free
regretted the withdrawal of the motion of t e it wit,
member for Manchester-hear)-not becedoeger le °
from danger, but because he thought that tue peOlh) cos
have been more than counterbalanced hlle alicil 1;04
this country knowing who were on their slootio bled bit
the side of Russia. (An ironical cheer.) beeltilyn brla, ielt
to say that hon. gentlemen opposite bet' bos"reelst
to 0
Russian gold, but he trusted to be able i tot poll
degree they had been playing the gam° 0". bele (45.
(Hear.) When his right hon. friend the rne°?,,,,g, 11l 010
inghamshire first gave notice of his resoltl.t1:00.11,00,
Seymer) had felt some doubt as to whether t,1.4 fig.1.,400;
in them. Peehaps in a party point of vielcrr their 9"; of
gentleman had not chosen a good maneut '°peat 1 g miLif
duction. He was inclined to think that the t,O co°r-e ,00;
yet ripe, but the proceedings of last Mendv4ere f. otti„cat
ably, hastened its maturity. (Hear.) . pubte°"o gr' ,
siderations, however, counected with this id be so a
far outweighed party motives. No evil °°e0b0013,11)„-f
as that a large portion of the popuiatio?
loot, 05,,.
well grounded complaint against the Flu'lle'd A le' e ti'
thought what had taken plow, had call he xeol serf
dissatisfaction out of doors, Nothing ccultoolel
ewe
gerous,than that the people of England 1! tbe os' 0 for
much in earnest, and the Parliament v'tiorefollioorl3o
appear tranquil-(hear, hear)-an be' hoe. Oita .4
independent member, thanked the right , opro,,,itit!op
Bucks for affording Line an opportunity 01,,hst reool
~
Peas
on the resolution before thew- i',, 0 0!,7 /let',
was not an address to the Crown, butsiraP, Jot o;gut t'it
of the House of Commons-(hear, hoer/ he thco'hio 10L
tiator having been withdiawn'frora ViVlng'irbe I),Keeti 'i;
time ripe for discussion. (Hear, hea's di a .-....10 et
the First Minister of the Crown had .atte °A.ostrivi to
portance to the co-operation of Alletris'os4 atilter,
very difficult game to play; but her•
~,i
teat pc!
~ to
think the policy of France and li16" ~1)0P../
• hes ore `"" . 0
moment telbe tied down to the vil'i oero .-ellti dig
Austrian co-operation at this moment rinoricg
..„
consist in oppressing the Danubta?,oPbette.,roo7o.
(hear, hear)-aucl he thought it wotdo "atter l'obo o,
allies if Austria took no share in the r° those ea ollaje
(Hear,. hear.) The difference bet Ween ,otletista to r,
on his side of the house anti honourahlt: to ' itlir
site was, that the former felt we 117 yet
oO'vi 00,
and honourable peace by the bravery 0 ,_t tbere_foreo oe
hear.) ' Hon. gentlemen opposite thootypeoso cole,tbetoi.
chances of peace arising out of th vle ,-,r0p0.1,1 el'orf
The friends with whom he acted did /10:' irt bOl:, bO A itl
:should always remain at Sebastopol; isn't,it aeot2 10;1000:ot
be kept in view that Sebastopol reb,in. it ,13`, otlea
different from that fortress as it now 0.0..0 to ti toe. to
stand, the bugle of triumph would...reeie:rmeweintiossi;ort
confines of India. (Hear, hear.) I._i_nia bi 0,1.00
there was nothing on paper which c!-'
..,,sr, a 0 an 0)011
keep a treaty. The war V(3B a just Wharf be tbe etyw
undertaken in defence of a pow•er whir sifordinger $0,.1,et
attacked • and it was necessail• $ reeition.e,rightl tbe
means of resisting the dangerom" egfer f,r. sfseptetiodi
(Hear.) The hon. member for 1,01031 hoxo 10 Toc_ntiof
year contended that Turkey shoul
~ity. of. 00 roe
Vienna note (that note which the as e_141411 /.o_. tbe,gTer
negotiator said would place Turkey cu,,, noto7. 00 ~r,
of Russia), or (and here the house Wool
tli:t suoTtbe;teet
rosity of the hon. member's preficeV)the end insis ° s/
key should fight it out, and if, l. obould JO 1,,e0 0:
Turkey had the worst of it, then sve 4004 hAPP„ht
maintenance of the balance thater.
there twos e_.:ol.o3oyvtee
the hon. member admit red
ithere vo's 1;(0:j be;
power, and then that the balance o y this were...o. b i tli,
ing for. Throughout the whole I
A °liloll, V°tbi 87 Pte bibs
behaviour of our soldiers lo- s•do of the P 80 es-seb), .
more meritorious than the attitudeado bad 1,04,18,01,01
country. (Hear, hear.) No brava Club''
te P er, lel
except Within the walls of the 0 opt dear, he;cercole
no boasting had been hazardood.
t:i.s. (I,loa coolo,
iett
gatherings of her Majesty's Ali i 5 i
factur_og.° tole _aco,ed
laughter.) Amongst the Malin _lffored Iv reeil!',,f
classes, • who had undoubtedly 0:vor shoo' t be, po.,oter,,
that the be nine , the l'eotul
only desire evinced was
end hero tbiole rhea e 0 ( tlO
with vigour-(hear, hear)--- slid rot ~, ot o oo•
to say that.on this subject he _el.,' feelisl.9,rnieribel hlte
for Manchester expressed the get!, that tbsof , to
,_,,
13
(Hear, hear.) It had been sale'
o', the ar,,, Der! /Too:,
country desired the ontinuanc_coXo-. (re. re ivoto..,
it;
fired by it. He denied that a.e
__..t.:13c0 0
0t_°...(30 ~,
farmers did not desire a conotVe'reased.::,, r opts;tot of
knew that a state of war led to,
wbieh ais ibe feoseatlja
thence to increased burtl- 1
But beru"bsir;cl v ' fc tb°"ooghl
thrown upon the land._anity, de tios o, be 0,
trusted, from motives of hum
ted th° lel° ust say es tbtro4
the strife. While he respercot
all, I]°°3o„ Isbot,„ei.
objected to our goi before ti,„.b0,00., no. vioti,„, pr°ol.
they put the cart
'raises so 10 ilt to
_WO
1110 Tr Ottg , kip
principles of our net .
onpr:ess•the weak, i $,11(4
*bele ho keel's:44u ''

put the C 3, --
renriai ..._
:,iles of our nature
the. of
olio- gio,
ess tb.e weak, and w_.
of t or,. .:,,,,4
J. hi respected the ietilmi • 1 ~,, „
r ' 4
, .. ',:.:,',-;.te • '
4", • ~.. '''•
, •,, - '-- ." . ;,,-•- ~ -, _ 1.4,‘,4.- 6ve.'"
''.. ' ~-,--,',.•••-•:.'i. t '.. -', :. ~.....-, -
.-_,,,,-_,,,,,-,,,,, ..„„;, ;.-.. ~ , . ,