The National Register.
London, England, 1811-07-14 00:00:00

THE NAT

Edward Gyfford, of Upton-place, Westhani, Essex, builder
acid surveyor.
Samuel King,, of West Lexham, Norfolk, money-sc;ivener.
Abraham Page, of Fakenham, Norfolk, brewer.
Theophilus Mitchell, late of Kingston-upon-Hull, chymist
and druggist.
George Dyson, of Dob-mill, near Holmfirth, York, cloth-
manufacturer. _

1-leiiry Mewburn, jun. late of Lloyd's Coffee-house, under-
Write.r and broker.

John Damm, late of Threadneedle-street, merchant.
Hoary Webster, of Roll's-buildings, Fetter-lane, jeweller.
William Brock and Benjamin Le Mesuricr, of Warnford-
court, Throgmorton-street, merchants.
Sergeant Bold, of Great Wild-street, Lincoln's Inn fields,
coach-smith.

Thomas Birrell, of Upper Baker-street, Mary-le-bone,
bulkier.

CERTIFICATES—Au c. S.
John Gray Gerard, of Etasinghall-street, merchant. —Alfred
Charles Smith, late of Kennington-green, Surrey, merchant.—
Samuel Bottomley, of Salford, Lancaster, liquor-merchant.—
John Hardman, late of Blackheath-hill, Kent, victualler.—
John Ellery, late clf Orange-row, Kennington-road, Surrey,
chymist and apothecary--Alexander Carson, jun. late of Malta,
inert:ham—Hannah Nutter, John Nutter, and Thomas Wake,
of Huddersfield, York, merchants. Jonathan Joseph
SOls, and John 'Winter Pidgeon, of Hambro' Wharf, mer-
chants.—Cornelius Wildgocm, of St. Philip and Jacob, Glou-
cester, coal-merchant Cooper, of the Minories, silk-
mercer.—Robert Bainton, of Lombard street,. provision-dealer.
Thomas Wilson, of Higham, Suffolk,
,miller.—John Williams,
of New Compton-street, St. Giles, baker.—John Prebble, jun.
of St. Mary Bow, miller.—Henry Houghton and John Humph-
reys, of King's .Arhus-yard, Coleman-street, merchants.—
V.'illiam Rieg, of Liverpool, merchant —Christopher Wild-
mai, of Great Newport-street, Lorige•acre,

LAIV REPORTS.

COURT OF JUNG'S BENCH.

THURSDAY, JULY 11.

KTERULFT V. WALTER.

-- -
After the Jury were sworn, Mr Jekyll, stated that this wag an
action against the defendant, the Editor of Tice Times News-
paper, fur a libel published therein; but he was glad to state
that it was not one that would go to any discussion before them,
for it had only been brought by the plaintiff, It gentleman of
considerable rank, to vindicate his character from the aspersions
.thrown out in that publication ; he had conversed with those
who appeared for Mr. John Walter, the defendant, and the
result wat, that they were disposed to allow his client to take a
.verdict for 1001. on account of the insertion of the par:graph
alluded to.
The Jury accordingly, without any evidence being vile into,
under the direction of the Learned Judge, returned a verdict
for the plaintiff—Damages tool.

FRIDAY, jut, 12.

THE KING V. SEDI.i:V AND OTHERS.

- - -
This was an indictment against D. Sedley, J. Sedley,— Myers,
and Baron Kierulft for a consloiracy, to defraud the Marquis of
Headforc of certain Bills of Exchange. From the evidence of
the Marquis. of Headfort, it appeared, that in Oct. IW9, he re-
ceived a letter from a person named Walker, who was unknown
to him, containing some overtures for advancing a sum of
.money, which his Lordship had at that time ot;casiou for; in
consequence of this his Lordship returned an answer, appointing
an interview, that interview however did not take place; but
instead of Mr. Walker attending his Lordship, a few days after
he received a letter from Myers, one oldie defendants, offering
to advance him a sum of money upon his notes, at three and
six months, an interview took place, and his Lordship gave
Myers acceptances at four and six months for 30001. awl received
in return of Myers acceptances for 28001. at 21 days. Of the
notes given by the Marquis were two of 10001. and two.
of 5001. each. Soon after Myers applied to his Lordship, and-
stated that the bills would be discounted with more facility
if there were other names to some of them instead of his, as
drawer, and that a friend of his would take one of the Sool. if
lits Lordship would, divide it into two notes of 3001. and 2u01.
This he consented to do, and next day received a letter from
Kierulft, the person alluded to, stating, that if his Lordship
would leave the two hills with his porter, the 5001. bill should be
returned. 'Phis was accordingly done ; but his "Lordship had no
further intercourse with Baron Kierulft. Money, however, did