The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1820-07-04 00:00:00

paw its consegbessce of ihe
tinned thereon. feet:win namber, were smelt us girt.,
likely to obtain Ustaaiunosta concurrence, thew
object being to maitre his Majesty's !torsi Bn.
them and Sisters. and certain inilividtbils
with the Itoyal Hueseholili during the late reigo.
in precisely the muse attire's cccc in which they pitiful
before the demise of its late lkirjesty. No ndditio:t
whatever to the ieellffir of hie Maje.ty's
relativer was eemprseed ill theire pri.losottoils.
Certainly he had we bennstinn in saying, that under
Obey circumstances. and Ova the financial saws-
' ries -of the country different from what it was, his
iiminiesty Would have felt it right to recommend as
emension of income to tine or two brooches of the
ilayal Family. The House was owarit that his
gird Highness the Duke of Clarence was in so
listsor• condition in twilit of income to Isis Royal
&others. But the wine conseilerations which had

induced his Majesty to forbear I'rou► requiring in iv
new grant for the support of his own household, had
influenced him to abstain I•rom recominending *IT
addition to the ',mime of hi* Royal 11Ingli.iess the.
Duke of Climber. though it was six II ~,,, 'amid a
year less than that rojoyed by the rest of his Royal
Brothers. He was sure the Houre would feel the
difficulties in which that illu•tnnos individual and
his consort were placed by this cootraction of their

circutustatices, whale they at the same tome anus'
adintle the prudent and moderate spirit displayed to
their domestic economy and arrangensents and sily.e
of living.—(Cries of Hear, hear, hear./--
Another branch of the Royal Fatally, whose Wile.
11011 lie had beets commanded by his Ntsje sty to no.
lice to the Howie, was the Duchess of Kent and Ilre
infant slaughter. But the same consideration lie
lied already explained operated with Isis Me.
jest), not to make any specific recominentletion with
regard VP these Royal individuals at site present
time. Nu iticonvenience resulted from the want of
r regular ellooatace so the Royal infant, because
Prince Leopold had generously takes, ou liikiself to
defray the charges of her erlocatiots—(ifepeorrrf
twee►:)—without, however, barring troy sight or
claim which his itsfaut relative might have ots Par-
liament. Her Royal Highness the I)ucloess of
Kent found it necessary to avail herself of the lobe.
rainy of her brother, its consequence of the limita-
tion of her own income, her slower under her former
marriage having lapsed. It was further proposed
to renew the pecuniary grouts to the amount of
241.000/. enjoyed by various persons forming u part
of the Royal Household, or having allowaisces on
the privy purse previous to the demise of Isis late
Majesty. It was not his attention to move that these
shoolsl he voted lisle highs, but he should
exploits them now. and move the votes in the
Committee of Supply on Wednesday. The
House had been apitrireil that •24.000 f. would
hr the rum required fur making these provisions.
New estimates had bees' laid us' the table of these
claims, which would folly enable the House to come
to the consideration of the subject on Wednesday.
It %Monty now necessary to describe the brads of
the charger. The House was aware that it war not
WWII to make provisions at the commencement of a
new reign fur the persons in the set vice of the late
Sovereign. But this was different from an ordinary
case, because his present Majesty had formed its
establislinseist a cousiderable atomiser of yew.* be-
fore the demise of the late King, and therefore was
tint its a situation to take the servards of his late
llajesty into his service. Of the 24,0001. required
9,500/. was to provide fur individuals who had been
actually in the service of his late Majesty at his
demise. For servants its the leteQueess's househo:d
4,5001. voisthe sum necessary. The Committee would
also be called on to renew their allowatsces to cer-
tain persons, to the amount of 10400/. whose ser-
vices had entitled them to be settled on. the Privy
Parse during the late 'vigil. Of these pensions,
about 8,000/. had been grouted by his late Majes-
ty himself, and 1,8001. by the lute Queen, duriote
the time that she had the administration of the
Privy Purse. He was sure the House would ac-
knowledge the justice of these claims. and lie
thought that wider the special circumstances vs'
the case. the admission of them by Parliament
would form no precedent. The Noble Lrrti theta
moved—
That it be tie opinion or she Committee, abet his Majesty
be enabled to paid to bis Royal Highness the Duke of Yurk
a yearly sum of savory, out exeeediug 14,000 L to he paid
oat of t►e Consolidated Fond of Enghtilltl and !Maud, and
to eoatusessee from the demise of his late Majesty.
The question having been put.
THE QUEEN.
Lord A. HAYII.TaIe felt very great surprise in-
deed at the course pursued by the Noble Laai.
rod his omitting to snake any mention whatever of
her Majesty, in opening his views respecting the re-
newal of the grants to the Members of the Royal
Family ; he thought the Noble Lord had iseglecs-
ed the discharge of an important duty of los offir.•.
Bat he wished first of all to stale why he felt bar.
prised—the House would recollect Chet he had
more thou once, since the demise of the late King.
asked the Noble Lord why he did not brorg the
subject of the provision fur her Majesty Under the
consideration of the House ? Ilis Right Hon.
Friend (Mr. Tierney) had drawn his attention to the
same subject. The Noble Lora.s reply always
was. that the proper time for bringing the subject
before the House was, when he came down with a
proposition relative to the grants for other branches
of the Royal Family.—(Hear. hear, hear.)—
He hoped he had not misunderstood the answers ;
that certainly had been his impression, and he be-
lieved that of the House respecting them. Utst
now the House found that the Noble Lord came
down with a recommendation for a renewal of their