The Sun.
London, England, 1855-02-08 00:00:00

CALCULATIONS ON THE MINISTRY.-
vv statesman can best guide the affairs of the nation, and
minister to the exigencies of the times, is a question very justly can-
vassed. Comfort is ministered to everybody by the seasonable
clothing manufactured by E. MOSE 3 and Sox.
That every one in the City, in the country, and in all parts of the
world may have the ministry of the newest and most appropriate
articles of dress, E. MosEs and Sox have recently improved the
styles and quality, and reduced the price of all goods thoy submit to
the inspection of the public.
At E. Mosus and Sox's the most commodious Clothing, Bat,
Hosiery, and Boot and Shoe departments, are eonnected with the
most comprehensive Wholesale business in the world. This offers
better investments for Merchants, Captains, and Emigrants than any
other merchandise can secure.

SPECIAL NOTICE.—UntiI March I, 1,55;E. MOSES and SON'S
ESTABLISHMENTS will be CLOSE D at EIGHT O'CLOCK EVERY
EVENING, except Saturday, when they will be open till 11 o'clock.

CAUTION.—E. MOSES and SON regrot havink to guard :be
public against iniposition,ho.ving learned that the mitradcsman-like
faltchood of " Being cennectsld with their Establishment," or " It's
the same concern," has been resorted to in many instances, and fez
obvious reasons, they beg to state that they have

NOCONNEZION WITII ANY OMEN ROUSE IN OD OUT OF LONDON,

except their own Establishments, as follows : .
London City Establlslnnept, 154, 155. 156, and 157, Minories, 84,
15, and 86, Aldgate, opposite theCharch. all communicating.
London West-end Branch, 506, 507, 508, New Oxford-street, 1, 2
and 3, Hart-street, all communicating.
Bradford (Yorkshire) Branch, 19 and 20, Bridge-street.
Shefileld Branch,_3(f, Fargate. -

Colonial Wholesale Branch, Melbourne, Australis.
Merchant Tallow, Clothiers, Hatters, Hosiers, Furriers, Boot an
Shoe 'Makers, and General Ont9tters for Ladles and Gentlemen.'
IMPORTANT.—ShouId any article not give satisfaction, it will be
exchanged if desired, or, if preferred, the money will be returned
without hesitation. AU goods are marked in plain figures, the lowest
price, trout which no abatement can be made.
The Establishments are closed from sunset on Fridays to sunset
en Saturdays, when business is resumed till 11 o'clock.
A new Book for Autumn and Winter. " The Commercial Cornu-
opia," containing full lists of prices, our system et self-measure-
ment, &.e.. &c., may be had on application, or post-free.
Tei i'on parte Francais. Qui al narla Itan: no.
Tiler soricht man Dent.el, Aqua PR habln Espano.
An Illustrate& Almanac for 1855 pratison application ,or post free.

RATE OF EXCHANGE. —The rate of exchange at Paris
remains with a favourable tendency. The St. Peters-
burg advices show that the export of gold must yield a
profit sufficient to lead to smuggling, wherever it may be
practicable, the quotation having now declined to 864 d.
ARRIVALS OF SPECIE.—The arrivals of specie yester-
day have comprised 182,0001., of which 65,000/. is gold,
by the Solent. from the Westlndies, and 1,6001. by the
steamer Natal, from the Cape.
[ADVERTISEMENT.]—Many thousand cures have been
effecte3 without medicine, by Du Barry's Delicious Reva-
lenta Arabi ca Food, of indigestion (dyspepsia), constipation,
nervous, bilious, and liver complaints, paralysis, &C. We
quote a few t—Cure No. 52,612.—Xr0m the Dowager
Countess of Castlestuart.—" Rosstrevor, County of Down,
Ireland, 9th December, 1854.—The Dowager Countess of
Castlestuart feels induced, in the interest of suffering hu-
manity, to state that Du Barry's excellent Revalenta Ara-
bica Food has cured her, after all medicines bad failed,
of indigestion, bile, great nervousness and irritability of
many years' standing. This Food deserves the confidence
of all sufferers, and may be considered a real blessing.
Inquiries will be cheerfully answered." Cure No. 71.—
Of dyspepsia, from the Right Hon. the Lord Stuart de
Decies.—" have derived considerable benefit from Du
Barry's Revalenta Arabice. Food, and consider it due to
yourselves and the public to authorise the publication of
these lines.—e Stuart de Decies." Cure No. 32,836. —From
the Venerable Archdeacon of Ross.— "Three years exces-
sive nervousness, with painsin my neck and left arm, and ge-
neral debility, which rendered my life very miserable, has
been radically removed by Du-Barry's health-restoring Food
—Alex. Stuart, Archdeacon of Rossi Skibereen." Cure No.
4,203.—" Eight years' dyspepsia, nervousness, debility,
with cramps, spasms and nausea, have' been effec-
tually removed by Du Barry's delicious; Food in a very
short time.—Rev. John W. Flavell, Ridlindon Rectory,
Norfolk." Cure No. 51,416.—" Fifty years' indeecribable
agony from dyspepsia, nervousness, asthma, cough, consti•
pntion, fletnloncy, spasms, sickness at the stomach And vo-
mitings, have been removed by Du Barry's exceliout Food.
—Maria Jolly, Wortham, Ling, near fuss, Norfolk." Curs
No. 3,oo6.—ThirteenSeam' cough, indigestion, and gene-
ral debility haire been removed by Du Berry's excellent
Food.—James Potter, Athol-street, Perth."--In canis-
ters, suitably packed for all climates, and with full instruc-
tions-11b., 2s. 9d.; 21b.,45. 6d. ; 51h., 1 Is. ;121b., 225. ;
super,refined, 1.1 b., 6s. ; 21b., 118. ; 51b., 228.; 101 b., 33e,
The 101 b. and 121 b., carriage free, on receipt of post
office order. Barry du Barry and Co-, 77, Regent.
street, London ; Fortnum, Mason, and Co.,
her Majesty, purveyors to
182, Piccadilly; also at 68, Cornhill ; 60,
Cracochurch-street ; 330 and 451, Strand ; 63 and 150,
Oxford street ; 55, Chirintcross`; 4, Ch-eapside ;25 and
54, Upper Baker-street.

PRIVATES.
James Griffiths, 21 Ba'ttalien Rifle Brigade, diarr.,
Jan. 21
E'lward Mailmen, 41st Regt., ditto, Jan. 21
Robert Dove, 2d Bat. Rifle Brigade, ditto, Jan. 22
William Anderson, 41st Regt., contusion, Jan. 21
William Roberts, 97th Regt., diarr., Jan. 21
Donald liutrose, Scots Fusilier Guards, ditto, Jan. 19
George Cartes, 21st Rest., febris, Jan. 19.
Joseph Walker, 50th Regt., diarr., Jan. 20
Thomas Lodge, Grenadier Guards, febris, Jan. 21
John Baugh, Scots Fus. Guards, dysentery, Jan. 18
Richard M`Guirk, 38th Foot, iens, Jan. 20
Wm. Deacon, 2d Bat. Rifle Brigade, diarr., Jan. 21
Walter Patterson, 6th Dragoons, sphacelus, Jan. 21
Henry Burgess, 11th Hussars, dysentery, Jan.2l
Hugh Smith, Royal Artillery, gelatio, Jan. 21
Wm. Barrett, Royal Artillery, catarrh, Jan. 22
John Black, Coldstream Guards, diarr., Jan. 21
Richard Sable, 30th Foot, ditto, Jan. 22
William Mills' 97th Foot, ditto, Jan. 21
Edward Birch, 2d Bat. Rifle Brigade, gelatie, Jan.2l
John M`Donnell, 46th Foot, dysentery, Jan. 21
George Crawford, 2d Dragoons, diarr., Je.n. 21
William Brown, 4th Dragoons, dysentery, Jan. 21
Thomas Morth, Grenadier Guards, febris, Jan. 21
Wright Ford, Grenadier Guards, dysentery; Jan. 21
John Millington, 4th Regt., febris, Jan. 21.
John Fallen, 9th Regt., debilitas, Jan. 21
Edward Quinn, 19th Regt., dysentery, JIM. 21
Charles Langtree, 47th Regt., scorletans, Jan. 21
Thomas Hozlin, Grenadier uards, diarr., Jan. 22
Isaac Wilkinson, Grenadier Guards, ditto, Jan. 22
Joseph Honeyball, Scots'Fusilier Gds., rheumatism,
Jan. 22.
James Chandle, let Foot, dysentery, Jan. 22
Patrick Downey, Ist Foot, diarr., Jan. 22
John Mills, 7th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 22
Edward Whittle, 19th Regt., febris, Jan. 22
Thomas White, 19th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 22
James Newman, 20th Regt , do., Jan. 22
James Back, 20th Regt., diarr., Jan. 22
John Clancey, 21st Regt.. dysentery, Jan. 22
Samuel Paget, 33d Regt., diarr., Jan. 22
Samuel Shaw, 33d Regt., febris, Jan. 22
James Biddle, 34th Regt., diarr., Jan. 22
Martin Lanham, 46th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 22
Thomas Bads, 55th Regt., ebris, Jan. 22
Thomas Simpson,,ssth Regt., diarr., Jan. 22
Patrick Mee, 60th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 21
William iloward, 57th Regt., diarr., Jan. 21
James Angus, 79th Regt., ditto, Jati. 21
Chris. Galston, let battalion Rifle Brigade, 'flaw,
Jan. 21
Thomas Oliver, 47th Regt., febris, Jan. 22
Henry Smith, Royal Artillery, diarr., Jan. 22
H. Linski, 88th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 23
J. Carr, Grenadier Guards, ditto, Jan. 23
James Tyo, 55th Regt., Jan. 22
John Rey, Ist Foot, phthisis, Jan. 23.
Frederick Stiff, 21st Rogt., diarr., Jan. 23
Jeremiah McCarty, 28th Regt., chronic catarrh,
Jan. 23
.George Colpoys, Ist Foot, ditto, Jan. 23
Lawrence Kelly, 57th Rogt., diarr., Jan. 22
' William Hattie 68th Regt., Jan. 22
George Traver, 68th Regt., diarr.' Jan. 22
James Angell, 77th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 22
John Ferron, 88th Regt., febris, Jan. 22
Thomas Warburton, 88th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 22
John Freeman, 95th Regt., diarr., Jan. 23
John Cronin, 95th Regt., ditto, Jan. 22
Thomas Griffin, 95th Regt., vulnus, Jim. 22
Elwd. Steevens, 97t1s Regt., fever and diarr., Jan. 22.
John. Dickson, ditto, dysentery, Jan. 22.
Fred. Burman, let Bn. Rifle Brigade, febris, Jan. 22
Henry Slayman, ditto, gelatio, Jan. 22
James Dunk. 2d Bn. Rifle Brigade, febris, Jan. 22
George Ashley, 21st Regt., febris Jan. 23
George Humbleby, 77th Regt., febris, Jan. 23
William Barnes, Coldstream Gds., dysentery, Jan. 23
Alexander McLeod, 4th Foot, dysentery, Jan. 24 •
Jahn Allen, 63d Regt., Jan. 24
Michael King, 68th Regt., sphaeelns, Jail. 23
William Perry, 23d Regt.' febris, Jan. 23
Richard Smith, 21st Rogt, diarr., Jan. 23
William Graves, 20th Regt., vulnue, Jan. 23
Wm. Carmichael, Sappers and Miners, diarr., Jan. 23
William Dooley, dysentery, Jan. 23
Jos. Toms, Grenadier Gds., ietura, Jan. 23
James Hudson, ditto, diarr., Jan. 24.
Richard Orrel, 20th Regt., catarrh, Jan. 23
John Connolly, 88th Regt., vnlnus. Jan. 23
William Marshall, Ist Regt., gelatio, Jan. 24
John Wardly, Royal Artillery, diarr. Jan. 23
Wm. Garrard, Coldstream Gds., febris, Jan. 23
Win. Crosse, ditto, diarr., Jan. 23
George Menlo, ditto, vulnus, Jan. 23
Jobb Ennis, Ist Foot, vulnus, Jan. 23
Thos. Einmerson' Ist Regt., diarr., Jan. 23
E•lward Mellott, 19th Regt. febris, Jan. 23
William Carlton, 20th It dittrr., Jan. 23
Christopher Cliff, ditto, rheumatism, Jan. 23
George 11±I'Carrell, 330 Regt., diarr.. Jan. 23
James Smith, 3lth Regt., glatio, Jan. 23
Maurice Clary, 44th R,gt. dysentery, Jan. 23
John Anderson, 46th Regt., diarr., Jan. 23
Robert Neil, 55th Regt , febris, Jan. 23
William Gould, 68th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 23
James Ryan, 77th Regt., febris, Jan. 23
Win. Dawson, let Bu. Rifle Brig., dysentery, Jan. 23
JoSeph Bennett, 2d Battalion ditto, ditto, Jan. 23
Win. Fletcher, Scots Fusilier Gds., 'minus, Jas. 23
AT ABYDOS.

Wm. Phelps, Royal Horse Artillery, diarr., Jan. 12
John Fleming, 28th Regt., febris, Jan. 14
James Eardley, 49th Regt., pneumonia, Jan. 15
Duncan M'lntyre, 79th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 9
John Vincent, Ist. Batt. Rifle Brigade, ditto, Jan. 12
John Collins, Amb. Corps, morbus cerdis, Jan. 12
DEATHS ON' BOARD SHIPS ON PASSAGE FREY THE
CRIMEA TO SCUTARI.
DIED ON BOARD THE T. HILDA.
Robert Downdes, a civil servant to Captain Sutherland
Serjeant Robert Stockton, 63d Regt., Jan. 13
Corporal Thomas Early, 63d Regt., Jan. 14
PRIVATES.
Thomas Haig, 42d Regt., diarrhoea, Jan. 21
Andrew Pheip, 42d Regt., Jan. 12
Henry Green, Royal Artillery, Jan. 11
John Franks, Royal Artillery, Jan. 22
William James, Royal Artillery, Jan..B
R. Laidlow, 2d Dragoons, Jan. 11
G. Hembrook, 6th Dragoons, Jan. 6
Wm. Golingay, 6th Dragoons, Jan. 5
James Cole, Sappers and Miners, Jan. 10
John Bermisson, 4th Light Dragoons, Jan. 9
William Hale, 63d Regt., Jan. 14
Henry D. Andrews, 63d Regt., Jan. 16
Joseph Hoyld, 63d Regt., Jan. 14
John Moffit, Bth Hussars, Jan. 15
Benjamin Squalch, Rdyal Artillery, Jan. 13
Daniel Collett, sth Dragoon Guards, Jan. '7
Peter Delany, sth Dragoon Guards, Jan. 13
John Holden, 95th Regt. Jan. 15
David Roberts,•63d Rage. Jan. 11
John Flounden, 90th Regt., Jan. 22
DIED ON BOARD THE SHOOTING STAR.
Patrick Roden, 57th Regt., diar., Jan. 21
John Crosswait, 21st Regt., rheumatism, Jan. 22
William Bunn, 47th Regt., diar., Jan. 22
Charles Frnen, 7th Regt., ditto, Jan.. 22
Charles Williams, 23d Rut., ditto, Jan. 22
William Bailey, 46th Regt., ditto, Jan. 22
William Burnett, Rifles, rheumatism, Jan. 22
Daniel Hall; 20th Regt., diar., Jan. 24
William Meekin, 46th Regt., ditto, fan. 24
Thonfas Wallis, 47th Regt., ditto, Jan. 24
DIED ON BOARD THE COLOMBO.
Sergeant John Heron, 63d Regt., fever, Jan. 21
Corporal Furrier John McMillan, 2d Dragoons, bronchitis,
Jan. 22.
James Allen, Coldstream Guards, dysentery, Jan. 17
John Thornton, Scots Fusilier Gds, dysentery, Jan.l7
William Arbnthnot, 4th Regt., ditto, Jan. 17 •
James Ekins, let Regt., ditto, Jan. 17
James McDonald, 11th Hussars, ditto, Jan. 17
Henry Anderson, 79th Regt., ditto, Jan. 17
Henry Stokes, 38th Regt., ditto, Jan. 18
G. Henderson, 79th Regt., ditto, Jan. 19
J. Murray, 3d Regt., ditto, Jan. 20
DIED ON BOARD THE NIAGARA.
Michael McLean, 46th Regt.. fever, Jan. 21
John Gibbard, 46th Regt., ditto Jan. 22
John Berry, 63d Regt., diar. ditto,.
22
James Franks, Royal Artillery, chronic dysenterY;
Jan. 22.

' DIED ON BOARD THE MONARCHY.
Serjeant John Sullivan, 63d Regt., Jan. 14
Corporal Alex. Goodwin, 28th Regt., Jan. 23
Corporal Thomas Cooper, Sappers and Miners, Jan. 6

PRIVATES.
Wm. Lund, Grenadier Guards, Jan. 21
Robert Hewett, 4th Foot, Jan. 12
John Dennis, do., Jan. 23
Geo. Wyatt, do., 22
•
Henry Wey, Ist Foot, Jan. 22
Wm. Carter, do., Jan. 13
Wm. Clarke, do., Jan. 14
James Edmonds, 9th Regt., Jan. 18
Frederick Richards, do., Jan. 10
Alex. Lawry, do., Jan. 22
James Cuthbertson, do., Jan. IS
Geo. York, 20th Regt., Jan. 7
Michael Gaynor, 28th Regt., Jan. 19
Thos. Quinn, 38th Regt., Jan. 18'
Chas. Brighley, do.' Jan. 9
John Jarrett, 44th Regt., Jan. 16
John Clarke, do., Jan. 14
Chas. Ward, do., Jan. '2O
F. Tamfield, do., Jan. 11
Michael Wallis! 60th Regt., Jan. 16
Henry Doyle, do., Jan. 22
James M‘Laughlin, 63d Regt., Jan. 13
Patrick Shean, do., Jan. 18
John Ward, do., Jan. 7
Alfred Daw, Royal Attillery, Jan. 9.
Jamee Minty, ditto, Jan. 19.
George Hillier, ditto, Jan. '22.
Francis Clarke, Sappers and Miners, Jan. 19.
Robert Farrier, ditto, Jan 9.

The following is the nominal return of deaths, so
far as they have been reported, from the 25th to
the 28th January :

Second Class Staff Surgeon Newton, of fever, Jan. 26.
Serjeant William Johnston, 68th Regt., diarr., Jan. 24,
Serjeaut James Frazer, 42d Regt., febris, Jan. 25 ,
2ergeastt John Irwin, 9th Regt., ditto, Jan. 26
Corporal Edward Williams, 23d Regt., diary., Jan. 25

PRIVATES.
Charles Mitchell, 68th Regt., cliarrhcea, Jan. 24.
William Sayer, Ist Dragoon; ditto, Jan. 24.
John Wilson, 63d Regt., rheumatism, Jan. 24.
Wm. M. Rowe, Royal Artillery, diarrhoea, Jan, 24.
„Tames Miller, Royal Marines,
diarrhcea, Jan. 24.
Charles Carr, 41st Regt., fever, Jan. 24.
Richard Newille, Ist Ent., diarchaaa, Jan. 24.
Thomas lloscrip, 9111 Regt., dysentery, Jan. 24.
Edward Cleary, 41st Regt.' ecorbutus, Jan. 16.
Win. Downing, Royal Artillery, anwarca, Jan. 24.
Henry M'Arthur, 2d Dragoon., diarrhtna Jan. 25.
John Ellis, Grenadier Guarde, diarrhoea, Jan. 25.
George Loce, 46th Regt., dysentery-, Jan. 24
Robert Pollard, Coldstream Gds., dysentery, Jan. 24
Jos.Mat ebwr i
BDtlyo,r6a3n ,(15R5etglat
.Regt.,chro bronchitis,nicv.h na atJi
rheumatism,
Bei rd Farrel, 19th Ragt., dierr. Jan. 24
John rown, 99th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 24
13
R. Batt, Ist Batt. Rifle Brigade, dysentery, Jan. 24
John Bone, 2d Bat. Rifle Brigade, dysentery, Jan. 24
George Isard, 7th Re,gt., febris int , Jan. 24 Jan. 24 24
William Wiggins, 57th Regt., diarr., Jan. 24
Henry Padget, Grenadier Gds., diarr., ,Tan. 24
John Twining, Ist Fool, febris, Jan. 24
John Smith, 20th Foot, febris, Jan. 24 •
Patrick Cooney, 21et Regt., diarr., Jan. 24
Thomas Williams, 23d Regt., iebris, Jan. 24
Win. Goodacre, 23d Regt., ysentery, Jan. 24
Henry Elliott, 23d Regt., gelatio, Jan. 21
Thomas Davis, 28th Regt., catarrh, Jan. 24
Wm. Hyatt, 41st Regt., dysentery, Jan. 24
George Taylor, 44th Regt.,
Jdysentery, JIM 24
. t
Wm. Horan, 46th Reet, diarr., Jan 21
Thomas Kesrns, 47th Regt., diem, an. 23
Philip M'Gaire, 63d Regt
Michael Henley, 68th Regt., seorbuua, Jan. 24
, rheumatism, Jan. 24
Thomas Ewers, 68th Regt., diarr" Jan. 24
William Black, 79th Regt., febris Jan. 24
Christopher Dunne, 79th Regt., fa , Jan. 24
James Mcdord, 88th-Regt., diarr.
4i ,
-- •
Peter Downing, 90th Regt„-tebna, . 24'' -
Moses Black, 93d Regt., dysentery, Jan, 24
Charles Lockwood, Ist Battalion hie., Brigade,
febris, Jan. 24
James Crippe, Grenadier Guards, diem., Jan. 25
Patrick Flynn, 19th Regt., febris, Jan. 25
Oscar Maples, 9,sthßegt., febris, Jan. 21
James Humphries, 41st Regt., febris, Jan. 21
Owen Mahon, 41st Regt., dysentery, Jan. 22
Edwin Swain, Coldstream Guards, febris, Jan. 23
William Watson, Scotch Fusilier Guards, febris,
Jan. 22
Edward Samos, 38th Regt., morbis cordis, Jan. 23
Robert Don, Scots Fusilier Guards, dysentery,
. Jan. 23
John Brown, 41th Regt., febris, Jan. 23
Samuel Collins, 33t1 Regt., febris, Jan. 22
William Allen, Ist Rifles, diarrhoea, Jan. 23
Edward Flaherty, 95th Regt., bronchitis, Jan. 23
William Jackson, 77th 'tee., febris, Jan. 21
Patrick M`Gainess, 9th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 24
William Sheppard, 28th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 23
R. Atfield, 20th Regt., die:llama, Jan. 25
J. Walters, Scots Fusilier Gnards, ditto, Jan. 25
J., Coates, Ist Rifles, ditto, Jan. 25
J. Delaney, 46th Regt., febris, Jan. 25
A. Grigg, let Rifles, dysentery, Jan. 25
H. Clayton, 21st Regt., ditto, Jan. 25
Wm. Warden, sth Dragoon Guards, febris, Jan. 25
David Garrett, 50ih Regt , dysentery, Jan. 25
Thomas Harries, 4th Regt., ditto, Jan. 25
John Taxford, 19th Regt., ditto, Jan. 25
Dellis Flanagan, 23d Regt., ditto, Jan. 25
George Currie, 49th Regt., bronchitis, Jan, 26
Thomas Banks, 50th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 25
George Stephens, 55th Regt., ditto, Jan. 26
R6bert Batty, 28th Regt., diarr., Jan. 26
George Phillips, Scots Fusilier Guards, diarr., Jan. 25
George Jones, 55th Regt., ditto, Jan. 25
John Jennings, let Regt., ditto, Jan. 25
Render Layfield, Sappers and Miners, diar., Jan. 24
Daniel Mceawley, Royal Artillery, vulnus, Jan. 25
Peter Rohan, 2d Regt., vulnus, Jan. 25
Richard Sayer, Gren. Gds., diar., -Jan. 26.
Henry Austin, 46th Regt., pneumonia, Jan. 26
James Cropley, Greu. Gds., febris, Jan. 25,
Samuel Heady, ditto, diar., Jan. 25
Robt. Welham, Scots Fusilier Gds., eoorbutus, Jan. 25
William Place, ditto, dysentery, Jan. 26
Joseph Godkins, 19th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 25
George Richlows, 19th Rov., febris, Jan. 25
Joseph Beyshaw, 19th Regt., diarr., Jan. 25
..
William Murray, 20th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 25
John McKay, 30th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 25
Michael Kinouin, 46th Regt., diarr., Jan. 25
Thomas Mitchell, 55th Regt„ dysentery, Jan. 25
Samuel Horton, 55th Regt., febris, Jan. 25
Jonathan Bloomfield, 57th Regt, dysentery, Jan. 25
Patrick Joyce, 88th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 25 .
Alex. Ross; 93d Regt., diarr, Jan. 25
John Holdsworth, 2d Bat. Rifle Bri., dysen., Jan. 25
Edward Morris, Royal H. Artillery; ditto, Jan. 26
Martin Gorman; Ist Foot, diar., Jan. 26
John M'Cracken, 7th Regt., febris, Jan. 26
John Ramsbottom, do., dysent3ry, Jan. 26
David Moody, 23d &Net., gelatio, Jan. 27
Alfred Healy 'do., diar., Jan. 26
John Mansfield, 34th Regt., dysentery. Jan. 27
James Forbes, 42d Regt., rheu., Jan. 26
Michael Clarke, 63d Regt., scorbutus, Jan. 26
Richard Burke, 21at -Regt., dyeentery, Jan. 24
James Roryson, do., diar., Jan. 26.
Samuel Wood, 49th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 26
James Woods, let Rifles, gelatin, Jau. 26
Thos. Belfield, 21st Regt., diar., Jai, 20
G. Hargrave, Royal Artillery, phthisis, Jan. 27
J. Carney, 5015 Regt., dysentery, Jan. 27
David Thompson, 46th Regt , ditto, lan. 26
George Fanner, 63,1 Regt., diarr., Jan. 25
Ww. Folly, Royal Artillery, ditto, Jan. 26
James Jarvis, 46th Regt., febris cordie, Jan. 26
Stephen Bedford, 47th Regt., diarr., Jau. 26
Michael Loury, 631 Regt.' ditto, Jan. 26
Jas. Sturgon, Coldstream Gds., ditto, Jan. 26
George Spain, 30th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 26 •
William Dodds, let Regt„.diarr., Jan. 27
James Jelico,4fst Regt., ditto, Jan. 27
Richard Cox, let Regt.,.ditto, Jan: 27
Adam Ludlow, Royal Horse Artillery, rlreumstism,
.Jan. 26
Wm. Cox, Scots Fusilier Guards, dysentery, Jan. 26
Thomas Hazel, 9th Regt., diarr., Jan. 26
Michael McMahon, 19th Regt., rheumatism, Jan. 26
John Belcher, 34th Regt., diarr,, Jan 26
Patrick Cavanagh, 41st Regt., bronchitis, Jan. 26
Francis McGuirk, 44th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 26
John Watson, 44th Regt., febris, Jan. 26
Francis A.ndrovve, 46th Regt., diarr. Jan. 26
Edward Moore, 46th Regt., febris, Jim. 26
William Verown, 49th Regt., febris;-Jan. 26
Joseph Sunderland, 49th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 26
Robert McDonald, 77th Regt., ditto, Jan. 26 •
John Cushin, 77th Regt., dysentery,' Jan. 26
John Browne, 93d Regt., dito, Jan. 26 -
David Cameron, 93d Regt., febris, Jan. 26
Donald. DcEinnon, 93d Regt, diarr., Jan. 26
James Booth, 95th Regt., febris, Jan. 26
Joseph Alexander, 97th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 26
John Eastwood, 97th Regt., diarr., Jibe, 26
Thomas Boone, Ist Rifles, rheumatism, Jan. 26
Michael Hagarthy, 41st Regt., diarr. Jan. 27
Arthur Robinson, 41st Regt., ditto, 27
William Jackson, 50th Regt., febris, Jan. 27 , i-.
William Davis, 47th Regt., ysentery, Jan. 28 •• --
Peter Rutherford, 2d Dragoen Gds:,
Charles Catting, Ist Foot, ditto; dan. 28
Wm.. Brown, Coldstream Guards, vulnus, Jan. 28
J.enes Dredge, 20th Regt., diary. diarr., Jan. 27' ''
, Jan. 27
George Roffey, Royal Artillery, gelatio, Jan. 27 -
G. Wright, 77th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 27'
F. Hanratty, 44th Regt., febris typ., Jan. 27
John Viney, 62d-Regt., dysentery, Jan. 24
Charles Tart, 9th Regt., diarr., Jan. 25
Peter Roberts, 95th Regt., febris, Jan. 25
George Harrison, 62d Regt., dierr. , Jan. 25 ..
John Wood, Grenadier Guards, aria, Jan. 26
Daniel Preston, 88th Regt., sham, Jan. 26 John St. Ledger, 55th Regt., ditto, Jan. 26 _
.23d Regt., rheum. , Jan. 27
John Jenkins, Scots Fusilier Guards, ditto, Jan. 26
30th Regt., ditto, Jan. 27
George Best, Coldstream Guards febris, Jan. 27
21.4415 t Regt., diarr., JAB. 27
William Johnson3oSthcoutses.feGbtrtsis: rjhaenu.m27.,
lath Regt., diarr,, Jan. 27
634 Regt., dysentery, Jan. 27Jan. 27
68th Regt., diarr. Jan. 27
WT.Trejahoheillisotal:imiei.prlasehamißcasPaPhglialoaamernwrrste,,:ei
Timothy .Eierliby, 63d Regt., rheum., Jan. 27
John Bilding, 77th Regt., ditto, Jan. 27
Henry Wilke, 90th Regt., diarr., Jan. 27
Solomon Chapel, 95th Rae-) Jan. 27.
JWohilnliaHnidoCdo,Pe77latuhdßegt., febris, Jan. 47
. .
DEATHS ON BOARD THECAPs
ON PA.SAOM /PROM THE
MEA.

DIED ON BOARD THE MONARCHY.
Private Thoniaa Brady, 88th Regt., Jan. 9

DIED ON BOARD THE SRIVATES HOOTING STAR.
P.
Richard Sleevan, 20th Regt., diarr., 'Jan. 26
William Cook, Coldstream Gds., fobris, Jan. 25
James S. Perry, Coldstream Gde., diarr., Jan. 25
James McKelvy, 77th Regt., ditto, Jan. 25
Thomas Jones, 57th Regt., ditto, Jan. 27
William Lynch, 57th Regt., Jan. 27
DIED ON BOARD THE KANGAROO.
PRIVATES.
George Willis, Grenadier Gds., dysentery. Jan. 24
Richard Lees, 47th Regt., d 0.., Jan. 24
James M'Kevitt, 49th Regt., do., Jan. 24.
William Woodward, 7th Regt., do., Jan. 25
Lewis Morrison, 6'2d Regt., do., Jan. 25.
Edmond George Tanner, 97th Regt., Jan. 25
Rodger Lynch, 47th Regt., bronchitisioJ. 26
James Latimer, 6.td,Rogt., , Jan. 26
Leonard Fletcher, 97th Regt., diarr
Jan. 26
George Ronfow, 47th Regt., do., Jai. 26

DIED ON BOARD THE ARABIA.
PRIVATES.

Christopher Allen, 41st Regt., diarr., Jan. 24
George Bull, Royal Axtillery, do., Jan. 25
John Bennett, Royal Artillery, febris, Jan. 25
Wm. Longden, Coldstream Gds., diarr., Jan. 25
Roger Atkinson, Grenadier Gds.,-gelatio, Jan. 26
Win. Carver, 41st Regt., debilitas) Jan. 26
John truunock, 4th Regt., dysentery, Jan. 26
Wm. Plummer, Grenadier Gds.,,gelatio' Jan. 27
Win. Gray, lit Royal Dragoons, diarr., Jan. 27
David Brown, 90th Reg., catarrh, Jan. 27
Wm. McKeehnil, 93d Regt., ecorbutus, Jan. 27
DIED ON BOARD THE SYDNEY.
Nathaniel Martin, 46th Regt., diarr., Jan. 2S

STOCK OP SAYINGS BANKS AND FRIENDLY SOCIETIZE.
—From a Parliamentary paper lately issued it is shown
that, on the 20th November last, the funded stock of
savings banks in the United Kingdom amounted to
31,086,5681. 14s. 9d. • and of friendly societies to
1,922,6501, Besides, .the•'halance uninvested by the
Commissioners of Savings Banks and Friendly Societies
was 174,6831. 16s. 6d.

tives the chief executive offices of the Government must be
filled. _The question is not whether better Ministers can be
fund in the country, but whether better Ministers are to be
f6und in the House of Commons ; once in- that body, such
men of mark may be left to acquire their 4tural, influence,
and to assert their proper station. The exercise of the
franchise alone qualifies men to enter the lists of
public life ; that power 'is in the hands of the
people ; and, in proportion as. it is used with dis-
criminationtua great-
nesstpresentsa4,paepmgoeir
tor
grand:o
i,hoefi purity, thpy;
ott
rho, results
nn. tsoi:nwt
imiw,llc:Fte
ah
ai; it
the new Administration does not cbcaiii from Parliament
n the
resolve upon
n ap-
peal to the count ui- Vq,
...whenever such an event doe:,
occur, it is intyttai: urge too strongly on the doctoral
body that they are bound to return men to whose keeping
they are ready to confide- the destinies of the State.
'At prelent,- however, the-first duty of the-Govemment is to
act with vigour in dealing with that terrible state of affairs
which the whole correspondence.from the East but too fully
confirms; and the impression to be produced on this coun-
try and on Europe by Lord Palmerston's Administration will
not. a little depend on his first acts. It is obvious that there
are changes to be made and defieiencies to be supplied in the
most important branch of the public service, without which
no improvement can be hoped for. Bold,.stringent, and de-
cisive measures are absolutely requisite. If they are taken,
we have no doubt that Parliament and the nation will rally
round the Government—if they are omitted, the country
will ask what we have gained by this change.

(From the Daily News of this day.)
Lord Palmerston is Prime Minister of England. After
forty-four years of official lite he has reached the top of the
tree. Lord Palmerston owes the position ho occupies moreto
his own abilities, and less to connections, than perhaps any
of his associates or rivals in the political arena. Ho has
ambition, and ho has the sentiments of an English gentleman.
There are, therefore, good grounds for believing that he will
aspire to render his Administration one of note and mark in
the annals of his country • andithat he will. aim at this end
by means conducive to the honour and interests of England.
Whether he will be able to realise his aspirations, by the co-
operation of the Ministers he has associated with him in office,
time will show. The material changes iu the composition of
the Cabinet are confined to the secession of the Earl of Aber-
deen, the Duke of Newcastle, and Lerd John Russell ; and
the accession of Lord Panmnre. In the Earl of Aberdeen, the
country has got rid of a Premier whom the instinctive sense
of the public-taught it to distrust and, recoil from, even before
the damning evidence that has of late been produced revealed
to all men his incapacity. In the Duke of Newcastle the
country has got rid of a Mipister singularly tenacious of
office, and singularly incompetent to discharge its duties.
On the other hand, the country has lost in Lord John Rus-
sell a statesman whom recent revelations prove to have been
earnest in urging his colleagues on to decided action, and in-

tolerant of mere formalism in office. - How far the ,accessioi
of Lord Panmnre will compensate for the-loss of Lbtd John
remains to be seen. Thus much may be prediclid` of Lord
Panmure's fitness for the office he now fills :—To carry into
effect the radical and sweeping reforms called -for in the
British army, a Minister is required who can, when necessary,
do unpleasant things ; and Lord Panmure has shown that he
not only can do unpleasant things, but take pleasure in
doing them) Turning from individuals to the general aspect
of the re-constructed Cabinet, it does not appear fitted
to inspire much confidence. The Peelites and the colourless
Whigs predominate too'much in it. That, however, is mainly
Lord Palmerston's concern. He has undertaken to accom-
plish the arduous task which lies before him by the instru-
mentality of these Colleagues ; and he is as much responsible
for the selection of his instruments as for the use he may put
them to. If the country at large is disposed to place more
confidence in the reconstructed Cabinet than it did in the
Cabinet' which preceded the late break-up, it is simply be-
cause Lord Palmerston, instead of Lord Aberdeen, is at the
head of it. Whatever hopes may be entertained Of improved
management of the war repose upon Lord Palmerston. If
these hopes are realised, the glory will be Lord Palmerston's ;
if they prove abortive; upon him will fall the shame and
blame of failure. If ho set tnwork honestly and energetically
to repair the evils occasioned by the narrow "views, indiffe-
rence; and incapacity of his predeaeasor, the country will
support him.
The conjuncture at which Lord Palmerston seizes the reins
of State is critical in the extreme. There is no 1.16 in seeking
to conceal the low ebb to which the British force in the Cri-
mea has been reduced. The exposure of its"weakness will be
no news to the Czar, and will not eneburage him to an attack ;
for he knows that the British are supported • by the French
before -Sebastopol ; and he is further kept in check by the
Turkish force gathering on his flank at Eupatoria. The con-
dition . of the Allies, and of the Russian army opposed to
them, renders it extremely probable that operations will be
in a great measure suspended on both sides till the middle of
March. The interval is the time allowed to Lord Palmerston
to reinforce our • army and complete its organisation, and
to concert with our Allies in what manner the campaign is to
be renewed in the Crimea. For the state of Sebastopol is
now such that, in all likelihood, instead of making its reduc-
tion the preliminary step to the ejection of the dispirited
Russians from the Crimea, it will bo &uric' necessary first to
drive the Russians from the Crimea, and then reduce Sebas-
topoli. by regular siege; or even by the slow process of bloici:s-
ade. One of our correspondents writes :—" liheforte ires.s esult
grown so strong—and it is growing stronger—,hat the
of a cannonade and an attack wou'd b.:, most oblematical
Whore we used to see plain earth, there arearepno w
palace a batteries;
and, in Sebastopol, every house is a tort andevery' .
citadel." •
The first care of Lord Palmerston must bo to have our army
placed upon a
g Our Allies have a right to ex-
'poet that we will take f°o°lt-tilr'-elir share of the work ; and the
national safety is incompatible with an • ignominious retreat
from the
po
asptru struggle in which we have engaged. • At present it
does ear that the English army in the Crimea' could
muster much more than 16,000 men. Reinforcements, it is
true, continue to.drop in, and there are always a proportion
of the invalids who recover their strength and return to duty.
But both these sources are inadequate to' compensate for the
drain of 1,000 men per week--7the rate at which the effective
force of the army would, but for them, be diminished. The
army has before it at least six weeks more of winter ; and at
their close the fever season comes on. Au attempt was made
in the House of Commons yesterday to deny that the weekly
drain on the effective strength of the army is so great as we
have stated. The medical returns, it was said, show that
It is much less than 1,000 per week. But these returns are
incomplete and fallacious ; they only give the number of sick.
in the hospital tents, anct omit all those who, though incapable

SIR CHARLES NAPIFT: AND TtiE ADMIRALTY.
(Mom the Times of this day.)
Thero'issomething quite uncanny about this awful, war.
Nothing— follows suit iu eit, and it goes wrong from first:to
last. How It began, how there was peace when there ought
to have been fighting, and fighting when we chose to
call it peace, everybody • knows, Ent its very festi-
vities turn sour, and in its givings of thanks there
is always a note out of tune. Sir Do Lacy Evans
appeared, with all honours, to receive that rarest
and richest meed of 'valour, the thanks of the Speaker
before the assembled house, but no sooner had he

opened his lips in reply than something possessed him to re-
proach his eulogists, and challenge to hot controversy all who

should' do less than justice to the Second Division. Then
comes the Mansion-house dinner. The Lord Mayor is seized
with the commendable ambition of presenting himself before
the eyes of the nation between the most stately and the most
eccentric of onr modern heroes. Garrick between Tragedy
and Comedy had sympathies for both, and it is hard to say
which he would follow. But no Lord Mayor of London that
ever existed could have shown simultaneous affinities to Car-
digan and Napier, or have harmonised two such utter disso
ciables. There, however, they were; to. make the best of
themselves. Cardigan did his part with perfect good taste.
There is something indeed suggestibe of Medal-no Tussaud in
the " ident;cal uniform" which he wore in the desperate
cavalry charge. But his speech was, with a slight exception,
the simplest possible narrative of facts, and is, indeed, a brief
history of the war throughout its earlier stages. His de.
scription of that most gallant, though Quixotic enterprise,
in which there was " the greatest apparent certainty of death
that could possibly be conceived," without the slightest
advantage to "be gained by the sacrifice, was at once digni-
fied, modest, and affecting. How it happened that body
of men so brave and well-disciplined, so attached to their
officers, and so well cared . for " by them in return,
should have been led to certain destruction with
scarce 'a word 'of remonstrance against a stupid and
suicidal order, Lord. Cardigan forbore to explain. 'Perhaps
he may have good reasons for his silence ; but in the mean
time we must bog leave to retain our belief that, notwith-
standing the valour and discipline' of that ill-fated corps, it
was recklessly offered up as a victim to that want of harmony
which is known to have existed, for some reason or other,
between itself and the other branches of the service.

And now for Sir Charles Napier. At all events, duty and
Obedience are not here overdone. The contrast is the greatest
that can be imagined. According to Sir Charles, the fleet
placed under his command was " badly manned and worse
disciplined," and he never had fair play from the Admiralty.
The conclusion is, that he has brought home
.his fleet with
scarcely the loss of a man, au anchor, or a spar. In the army
we seem to have perfect organisation and entire destruction

—in the navy no discipline, and no loss ;. there not being
much to choose between the respective results on the enemy.
But, disguise it as we may, the spectacle of a magnificent
fleet assemliiing in the Baltic, and coming back scathless,
with nothing to show but the destruction of some granite
works and the capture of 2,000 prisoners, done by soldiers,
not by sailors, does not command itself to the taste of the
British people, and has not found favour with the Admiralty.
So Sir Charles has been relieved of his command, and, as a
natural consequence, went off at the Mansion-house on Tues-
day like an unlucky gun that hangs fire and then eiplodes
at half-cock. In the strange mixture of exposures and re-
serves that run through his speech, it is impossible to
form any judgment on his case. Nor is he always con-
sistent with himself. The principal exposure is, that the
Admiralty asked Sir Charles " why he did not take S mea-
berg, and why he did not do this, that, and the other;" in
fact, why he did not do something The question is so natu-
ral, that one looks for the answer, and Sir Charles's answer is
a very mysterious one. Ho says he proposed a plan for taking
Sweaborg, which might be taken by a certain day, though he
does not tell us what the plan was, why he proposed it in-
stead of executing it forthwith, and what the answer of Go;
vernment was to this apparently gratuitous proposition. A
we do not know the letter of Sir Charles's instructions, it may
be rash to pronounce on his conduct on his own showing ;
but, that a raan,should take a magnificent fleet to the Baltic,
send the Admiralty a plan
and, instead of doinganything,
e mg that it
way or another. As to the delay
foonr
tdho.ei doing something,
dmr
altyis then
saonudtt e
ily nortoted osqi
iti,a a na
pd
rthrow
.th e blame
demands explanation o
in the capture of Boma , employment of French
soldiers which enabled the Emperor Napoleon to take all the
to the English Government proposing
rs"und and that
credit, by conferring a baton on the General in command,
not more luck). than on tho matter of Sweaborg.
Sir Charles is
,I:yersss:mids, Why he should write at all, or pro-
-.vs do not know, 'but lot that pass. 441
" no other troops to enable me to go there.
oofsaetwtlaFy
anything,
nsmagg,
I
wanted,' he
enough ; but the French Admiral thought it
-more proper to have some. The French Government sent
out 10,000 troops accordingly. I repeat, that I did
not want them they would much better have been
employed at Sebastopol. I only asked for one or
two thousand men to make the thing more sure, but I could
have done the work without them, and I wrote home to that
effect. However, they scut us out 10,030 men." Can any-
body make out from this whether Sir Charles asked for wore
men or not? He first says that he did not, then Oat he did,
and lastly that he did not. If he did, of conrso it is a very
great pity, as the French have reaped all the glory of the
achievement, and the British army has not even that to boast
of. We quite agree, too, with Sir Charles, that just at that
time 10,000 men would have been better in the Crimea. If,
as he seems to admit, ho did ask for ono or two thousand
soldiers just to make the thing more sure, when be had an
ample force of Marines in his fleet for this very sort of occa-
sion, ho must not complain if tho British Government took
him at his word, and, having more regard to the success of
the joint cause than the private glory of England, sent him
the very effectual assistance of 10,000 French soldiers.
But what is the real imputation that Sir Charles must ad-
dress himself to ? • It is not-simply that he has done nothing,
except opposing a very imperfect obstruction to Russian com-
merce, as much to our loss as theirs. No sensible person
wished to force our wooden walls into collision with the
granite walls of the foe. People talked of Cronstadt, to be
sure, and they talk of it now, but they do not wish anything
thisnigr
to be done rashly, and they are quite ready to hear what
Charles has to say on the question of " Wood versus Granite.

•
• Lord John Russell is not in very high favour at the present
moment, and, therefore, we have the more satisfaction in
complimenting him for having in. one instance—we admit its
singularity—shown insight and sagacity. .Ho refused Sir
Charles Napier the coven-bend of the Mediterranean fleet, be-
cause, in his, opinion, he " wanted discretion," Our readers
Rill remember Lord. Palmerston's manly vindication of Sir
Charles from • this charge, at the Reform Club banquet,
founded on a:retrospect of the gallant admit al's character and
services. Nor will they have forgotten the very handsome
terms in which Sir James Graham, now the object of Sir
Charles Napier's vilification, spoke of him ou the Fame occa-
sion. .now • appears, from the. enraged admiral's own
admission, that Sir James,
,letters during the stay of the
fleet iu the Baltic, bad frequently -abeolved him from this
chargeof want of discretion. After all, it turns out that
Lord John.Bassell was-not very wrong in his estimate ; for,
certainly, whatever. character for " discretion" Sir Charles
Napier may have wrung from the First Lord of-the Admiralty
(hiring the past year, he has utterly forfeited it by hie extraor-
dinary and unjustifiable speech' ua- Tuesday evening. The'
truth we suspect to be, that the. militant portion. of the
Napier family are discreet enough- when on aetual service,
but that-they cannot be trusted' with a pea in their hand, or
with the liberty'of public speakir .., •
Sir Charles Napier is in a gre,t • go, but it is difficult to
discover exactly what has worked 'him up into that oblivious
state. His charges against Sir 4,,suies _Graham are of that
conglomerated kind which aro often. heard from-infuriated
females who are too much.in a plat4-..,rretrvapeak distinctly. Of
what is it that ho complains f • -He says he ;has been
censured by his Governmbnt, and dismissed' from
his command—the gentlemen mound him flatly- -con-
tradicting' this latter statement. At peesent, the public
whatever opinion may have been formed of the
singular contrast between Sir Charles Napier's earlier and his
later career—are in noetfficial way informed of either the one
or the other event having yet occurred. In Sic absence of
positive evidence on these points, whence the boiling indigna-
htioreof Sir Charles Napier? Is it. hee-euse_ as 9unicti cont.
• mender, he has performed an evolution analogous to the cele-
brated military manceuvre of the • King of France and his
twice ion thousand men ? Is it because Sir James-Graham
ea tees., to time, wrote him letters uread; trim to :action
What could bo mere natural ? An adm ,al on servi.Pe does
not supersede the Government in their functions, whatever
opinion they may have of hie " discretion.," The kind of
"-discretion" displayed by the gallant admiral was se very
unlike that of his earlier and more active years, that the plb•
lie will scarcely
,be astonished to hear that a little stimuldire
was applied to what seemed his flagging energies. We cannot
help suspecting that the solo cause of Sir Charles Napier's
soreness is, that he imagines he has fallen in the public esti-
mation. It must be mortifying to a man with a forty-Napier
appetite for glory, to have taken out the most magnificent
fleet Lnglaud ever sent forth, and to have )C12,11 COM'Pe dto
bring it back again without having achie ,ed another e d
a
more memorable St. Jean ,l'Acre. How does Sir o:rles
know that the public do not fully give him credit for the pa-
tience with Which he kept his ships from grounding ; for his
watchful care ire bring all his floating flock back again in safety;
I and for his oudence in retiring before stone walls ? We ven-
turs to say -that as much credit as this spoilt child of victory
deserves ho will receive ; although it be not exactly the cus-
tom to vote the thanks of Parliament for the kind of services
he performed during the last campaign. Admiral Dundee
did not go to the Black Sea with so enormous a reputation as
that which Admiral Napier bore with him to the Baltic ; but
he effected very nearly as much. He has quietly surrendered
his command to another, and ho at least will show better taste
than to rail against his superiors becaus6 ho does not receive
the ovation due alone to some great achievement. Sir Chas.
Napier ought to understand the full value of subordination.
A professional grumbler iu the :House of Commons is in a very
different position from an admiral on service ; and the gravest
affairs of a great nation ought not to be discussed in the spirit
of a clap-trap speech to the electors of Marylebone.
The professional jealousy of Sir C. Napier with regard to
the interference of an engineer officer might be more excus-
able on a less suleasu occasion. As, however, it was a ques-
tion of attacking batteries, the Admiralty can scarcely De
blamed if they wished the opinion of a man whose specialty
that was. As to the " insulting and degrading letters," un-
til we better know what they really were, and by what con-
duct they were provoked, it would not bo right to express
an opinion which might be prejudiced against Sir
Charles Napier by the singular exhibition he has just
made. With regard to his dictating to the Crown :and-
the country the future exclusion of Sir James Graham
from the Admiralty, that,• we suppose, must be passed over
in silence ; the threat having utterly failed to deter her Ma.
jesty or Lord Palmerston from again inviting the right hon.
baronet to contribute his eminent services to the Government.
Sir Charles Napier has made charges rather of a personal
than of a public nature, and we have no doubt that in due
time and season those charges will be met. Upon one other
of the recommendations of Sir Charles there will be a painful
division of opinion. When he talks of his name being
" scratched from the Navy List," he presupposes his country-
men oblivious of the gallant services he rendered in former
years ; but when he hiuts.at " not being -qmployed again,"
he indiscreetly raises a question silently revolved, we have no
doubt, in the minds of 'all who heard or read his speech,
but -which few Englishmen would desire to see publicly dis-
cussed.
The speech of Lord Cardigan—which, in its calm dignity,
formed so strong a contrast with that of the gallant admiral,
although he, too, might have found a theme for censure
—will have been read with an interest
to whichproport it
proportioned t
o
that already excited by the noble deeds
re-
ferred. The Earl of Cardigan spoke little of himself, but
much of the memorable charge which so signalised the heroic
courage of his troops, and which will have left his name to
posterity as the modern type of English Chevalier. Those to
whom the character of the noble earl has been presented in az
unamiable aspect may perhaps be surprised to find, that in
the soldiei of the highest stamp the keenest sensibility. is not
incompatible with an undaunted and unreflecting bravery.

(From the Morning Advertiser pfthis day. )
The speech of Sir Charles Napier at the Mansion-house, on
Tnesday, in which he so fiercely denounced the conduct of
the Admiralty towards him while in the command of the
Baltic Fleet has. created a "Teat sensation. -The place may
not have been the most suitable that might have been chosen
for such a purpose ; but certainly the revelations the gallant
Admiral made were of a most startling nature, while the in-
vectives which ho hurled at the head of Sir James Graham
were of the most furious kind which ever proceeded from the
lips of one man speaking of another. Never was such an ex-
plosion witnessed. The matter cannot remain where it ie.
Sir James Graham is bound to give some explanations to the
country respecting the very grave charges which Sir Charlie
Napier prefers against him ; ,nor should any time be lost tli
the performance of that duty. The public not only has 14F
right to explanations, but it has a right to expect that they
be made at once.

THE Sorra SEA HOUSE,—'this well-known edifice in
Tbreadneedle-street, with its Doric portico, its qua-
drangle, with Tuscan colonnade and fountain, and ex-
teneive vaulted cellars, is to be brought to the hammer
—the Conservative Lard Society having been already in
the field to negotiate fur the purchase by privat3 con-
tract, in which mode, it appear'', the di: e3tors are not
empowered to sell. The South Sea Company was ori-
ginated by Harley, Earl of Oxford, in 1711,
for the dis-
charge of nearly ten millions of public debt, and in
1553-54 the South Sea Stock was converted or paid oft.
The building occupies more than half an acre of ground,
and its value for building purposes is of course enor-
, MOIIP.
PUBLIC Parrrrosrs.--The list now includes 32 peti'
144ioSnpoeftitthioentas,
ilseiaggneeddabtyy
tient; for a repeal of the stamp duty on newspapers,
signed
many
Ott
carriage", especi:illy omnibuses ; four petitions, signed
pbeyrsoln2e3,lflorP_aenisaltsej.
by 1,306 persons, for prohibiting the use .of grain for
distillation ; and two petitions, signed by two persons,
for prohibiting the sale of spirituonS.liquours. -
is also a petition from Mr. Joseph George, the church'
warden of St. Anne's, Westminster, for thr dismissal of
her Majesty's (late) Ministers ; and three petitions,
signed by 413 persons, for the vigorous prosecution of
the war.