The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1820-05-13 00:00:00

• w}. ~ ~.

• •

. .
• • altar, Veepeetiog the eendoet of the riseinhly
iiassaultiog a mem who was fakir to be at spy, we kentsee, •
Won tho Marieltesier Pollee Mice, • The Learned Jake
Bed void the Jokey that this roadie insidd serve to ire pluio
Whatilie C. Manley had said respecting bb haired of spies.
Uposs the austweitp wf bis•Liwrsed (Park'.) Notes,
foe adfortainateliples had that bieteelf beese*peesent when the
lbeirsed Judge memaard,up, he matt she that he had bent
ifebiend the ordee of the fens, roe 't \ea:lash au Collier had
Wile place heroes Air aware Welorley had cubic es the
gensod. The Lensed Cosseelhierni 'has gning to argue on
sfidavits w(nel had bees read, iktf interning the Ce",tiThell
the rule Niel was crashed, but was slopped by
• hi,. Justice BATLIFT, who teemed hire that Ibis course
was irregelar.
The Leirueol Cosiseel resented and said, it was a great'
haralehip sin she individeal, although lie conceded that it was
roper In abide hy the hike of the Court.
Chief hoitiee AteMelee-eol, Suppoeisg that the /mitre did
noels, die order of facto, adding' peened to that, supposing
11 orinstiled ^ .
Me. Pastime resumed, and coateuded that it inlaid then
sppehr, front the Latteeed)edge% charge, that Sir Charles
Illohmloy had gives as order to the people to maltreat the
ogrostable, which order had bees obeyed. This must have
Sad great weight with the Jury, as the tussahs' up and .
charge of use Lensed Judge Mesita had, and therefore be
..liumbly so bode ted this was important grammar°, a sew trial,
sad glees it might bibs granted.
Mr Cisneros' beard os the same side, and contended that
ha
est/ one set of fbirelence had been committed, it eersiiialy
• was imp/se:sot lobe* whether Sir Charles Wolseley could be
to any Way coosseciled wish that Mt, sad thenfure Hui
mistakosent of the teamed Judge se to the order of the
facts was most Important.
Mr. Cum, was beard on the port of Herrin.. The in.
• 'fitment charged, be said, not any particular words spoken,
but an intention to disturb the peace, mad excite hatred and
emetenspt of the Goverment's ; the motive of the speaker
was therefore to be looked to, sod as be ems addressing a
brie assembly, the Defendant most have spikes loudly, so
that oil might hest, him; therefore the Learned Judge's
Vt3llol.it•g was bad when he bad told the Jury that there was
in contradiction of the whiten, Johnson, because uhe man
might hear what another did n't. The attributing the ante.
ardent attack on the constable to words afterwards spoke.
DI Sir Charles Wolaeky was, he most submit, such a solidi-
- ?redoes of the Learned Judge as ought to entitle the parties
to since Trial. In support of this reasoning, the Leaned
Cosner' referred to the case Howe e. Stroud, 2d Wi/1/011,
page 269.
Chief Justice AlilleTT-0 The difference between that
ease and the permit is very material. It (the observatioa of
the Isid4e) was there given in the stature of • direcetan, sod
appl,ed to the whole case.*
Mr. Cam?, in conclusion, keeled, as the erectness'
reasonings of she Jury often were a cause of error, mach
more powerful must be the effect of any error in the Infer-
ences of the Judge, and therefore he trusted the Court would
be picarr d to giant a new trial.
Teel! Lordships delivered their 'revisions aerialist.
The. Loan entry Joyner said, he did nut think that
sufFeteot grounds had been laid to induce them to gent *
new trial this rate. His Lordship observed there were
two points 91) which the Court had usually granted new
trials, via. misdirection on the part of the hedge, or a err.
(Let unt warranted by the evidesice. Now as to the first,
there was so important difference between an observation
on matter of law, and a remark or observation on a pra-
ctise. part of the evidence On the first point but little
coedit he left to the Jury, tint the other, from its very ma.
tore, wail left fur their considnation and derision. As to
the testimony of Johann, as compered with that of Gersten
oriel Thorns: it certainly did not follow" brcause one or two -
have not beard, thalthereture the words were not-spoken. The phblic begin to feel somewhat impatient to
The, it., not say aim was spoken, and there wal • material what device the Cuatscitautt of the EX...
differetsce between a wituess who tells all that was spoke.,
mot one who gives evidence only to what he bas notheard, CHEQUSS. will. adopt this leer fur meeting the cur..
Stith respect to what the Learned Judge had said of Jam. • reel expenses of the Sitiee. =ll<ia speculations of the
• sole. evident* being immaterial, supposing that the whole .on have failed most mi •
serably, and wb
of the testimony were struck net, he thought that sufficing I. 'CystSeAst.
world remain to warrant the Jury drawing That conclusion fear, that the is permanent financial system" OW
I •
whii.e:'stsbr7citid,ssetirrsaswi'ion
as to the time of the moot, sup... pounded and adopted year, will /kid ,den
..241posing that the Judge bad so mistakee, which was not very the present Session te• See of t'sose•eher laid* ,
likely, yet as the Jury had heard she whole of the evidence, mutual expedients to whieft 44 totala ille*tea •
they could and but have detected ibis error of the Learned
Judge, bud it been committed ; fur it is nut to be supposed i sure seem so fondly attached. Not wily will .t(lettet
that Juries du not ise their judgment and discretion um be no sinking fund this year. hut it is mock to be
tbereasonines and summing up of the Judge. Now looking .
apprehended that there will be an actual deficiency
at ease without the evidence of Johnson, he thought that
saffieirist remained from the tertimuny of the witeesses for I in the total amount of the revenue, including the-
Defeadants to confirm the evidence of the Winnows for the i _
Crone' ; therefne, he considered that no new trial should he ISOnlinol. sinking fund, as cent pared with the
ex-
hail In this ease, because uo injustice had been done to the I peuditure of the year, and which must be made
Defendants.
tither by loan or an issue of Exchequer bills.
Mr Justice BAYLEY said, it was a risk of the Isle Lord nod
Xerivon's in regard to conflicting testimony, to rode i The 'CHANCELLOR of the EICHEQUILR exyressed
to recooelle It, fee if it was irreconcilable, then perjury had
hi. belief on Tnursday evening, on Mr. M•aatte
born committed. Johnson stating what lie dues affirms.
lively, he is perjured if it is not true; but what Geroelt tAr's motion, that the new duties would be fond.
sued Thomas state negatively, is, M most, only matter of I productive within the whole year to the amount
..pinion, and they may state that opinion without being pee.
jeered. This was Ghat he (Mr. Justice Bayley) should base I estimated last Session. But what advantage is it
udd the Jury; and the expressions of the Learned lodge at to the country thole` one class of duties should the treat amounted osly to that direction, and nail putting
et on that solution, sad was by no means improper. As to i productive, if other classes foil in an equal or •,
...bat had been said respecting the observations of the i,srel'ader degree, and thereby leave the balance in
LTsio Tied Judge, '4 that she treatment of tlig constable served-
to diew what Sir Charles Wolseley meant by bichateed the sums total more unfavourable than it was
and iuformers ;'" in his mind it Ciaitily appeared diffi. The total amount of the revenue for the year ended
fun to connect this observation of the binned Judge nil
lie treatment of the attestable. ;He agreed with my Lord 3th of April, 18i0. including the new duties, was.
Cruel Justice, that lieiree'und Ised'beeti `laid fora new trial. according to the official returns, leas than that of
Joatieste Hi/tie...xi tomtit) With his Learned Brothers,
the year preceding by a sum not much :Mort of a
ii.at re, grtiarods had bevels)," fur a sew trial. The speeches
•ura resolution clearly shirred that the operably was an on. I million. The Treasury therefore gauss nothing by
'lawful wee, and ihe cuuduct of the Defendants was with the
the success of the new taxes, if the old taxes be
charged is the isdiciment.
Mr. Justice Ben bad never thought there wereauy grooods proportionally kss profitable than usual. Mr. Maa •
for tt.. role to sheaf tine, bat in this case be was Dot sorry ilitaLx's tnggestion for removing some of the present.
at load bars granted, for as it was s criminal charged a pe-
collar if it wassiated that injustice bad been done, most burdensome and killing duties pressing most.
was It iteisould be examined to the bottom, and that till severely upon the pour, and establishing in their
'beano punishment should be awarded. But to gran a new
t. ial us Ode case would be absurd, because, .
blotting out all place an lueutneTax upon real property, wog not
. tee leaCtiermy Objected to, it did not appear that ally other j uufavounibly rvcrivtd it ths#o.m...
ve•diedwienolii have been given. Loukiag so the language I e. •
heat,* she Defeeidaot Harrison, he *hooch( that woo sum-
creamlike Make the meeting angst and if Ste Charley, Wolin
nol spoke at all, if he eontioued 10 assist at the
Meeting after Web language had bees used, be was as eel- •
ti,: nahy responsible as elle other.
ToeSotaceron-Cisastin. mow prayed the Judgment of
the Cosset.
An nth 'sett of Air Charles Welesley% was put is and read,
maims t:oit hr had ou'prevloss concert with Harrison, and
Test b. was immerse' that any versos, ascent to attend the
iseming armed with sticky, or he Hiroshi out have attended
a. ; that be was is possession of a lifg estate only, which was
eirierly eotaind on his eldest nu, and that In hod four
.ousimier children.
Mr. PtAinson again addressed the Court in mitigation
iet punishment.
The rieiverroa-Gem now wag heard in reply.
Sir Chinks Wolseley here asked permission to address the
'the Coors, sod was proceeding to reply to an obsematiou of
. slot Solicitor Geeeral, vibes he was stopped by
The Cote* henna, who infurmed him that linter been
bawd -by his Counsel, it was iseonsistens with the rules of
toe Court that he Arnold be heard.
See Charles Wirlseley bowed and desisted.
The Cites JusTice said, Ilse Court would take till Mon.
dastbtoonaider of the judgment. Harrison meet refuels in
e and ovediag tp the missal practice of die Court,
100,14 112er as
Defroilaot mum he committed to the custody of
ifielliesslial of the Court till
,flW.Charlea W,ol.eky mid Harness them withdraw in Ike
mow* of the siltatar• •
TOs SOW IP. Janina NASH.
tido Diakesdastl ad. 1/011 e.osivkied et the last reek.
AMitimof saltimsaiditirroa publieatiom, was brought op for
issegvisoa4 hat the Stmarsartoa-Gessmat. amiss ha had
Jm Mfolseit that he had sllssiated from Mlles that met wf
sielibmtliotiat:hs,zi eld eat prom foe the jefirmeat of the
. =°Pim was aetasdiugly dliebaspil as oder-
Ma bb sou maregaisarma fee MI.

Bitriristi PREss.

LONDON,
SATMlipit M*r IS, WO.

A petition was presented yesterday evening in the
House of Lords, by Lord Hol.L.ttep, from a,
clergyman of the name of Jonas, in the diocese
of Exeter, complaining that he had been refused
institution by the Bishops of LINCOLN soil PBTER.
sonoucm, to benefices to which he had been pre-
eente.d within their respective dioceses ; and that
the Bishop of Exam had refused to countersign
his Tessimuniuns, without sufficient cause. The
opposition offered to Mr. JOWLS on the part of
these Prelates is attributed to the circumstance that
he had impugned the ductriuee of the church of
England, by yen...tiring in strong language the
Atharrasimi Creed; but the Bishops acted solely
upon the discretion vested its them by the consti-
tution of the church, and refused to assign 'heir
motives. The petition was rejected in the Hume
of Lords, on the ground that the case to which it
referred did not lie, in the first instauce, within the
jurisdiction of that House. We ore ourselves very
far from professiug to admire, because we really do
not understand, the Athanusien Creed ; but we
most confess, that while it is continued a part of
the liturgy of the church, it deserves to he at
least treated with reipect by the established clergy,
and if a clergymen is unwilling to acquiesce in
the principles or practice of the church, we see oo
great hardship in preventing him from eijoying the
advantages which this venerable establishment is
so well capable of granting.

A great many petitions were presented in the
House of COIDIDOOII from agriculturists in various
parts of the kingdom, praying for relit'''. A pe-
tition in favour of Parliamentary Refoitri was pre-
sented by, Sir M. W. RIDLEY from Newcastle-
upon-Tyne. We were afraid that every ides of
a Reform iu Parliament had been clamoured down
is. consequence of the violent proceedings of the
Radicals, but we find that, good sense can still
pursue its tranquil course in defiance of conflict-
log passions sod prejudices.

The debate cos the second reading of the Civil
List Bill, was postponed until Mondry next.

..We have received Paris-Papers or Tuesday 1.4.
The) state that Olivier, who was arrested on Sa-
turday night as he was proceeding to ignite the pe-
tard under the window of the Duchess of BERRY'S
apartment, has made disclosures, in consequence
of which three other individuals were arrested early
on Sunday morning.
The Duke of AKGOULEMC, now making a tour
in the south-east of France, was expected at
Grenoble on the Bth instant. from whence he was
to return to, Lyons on the 11th, and thence pro-
ceed by Bourg and Besarc,rn fur Strasburg.—The
debate on the Custom. was resumed iti the Cham-
ber of Deputies on Monday, and adjourned to the
next dry.

The five per Cent. Consols ere 73 fr. 65 e...
Bank Actions 1.5021 fr.

Dutch and liamburgh Papers have arrived,
the former of which are to the I Ith instant. The
ice in the Neva broke up on the 17th last. after the
navigation of the river hail been closed for six
mouths. Sal. R. Kau PURTta flint returned to

.§t. Petersbargh from a v met to Pent*.
with beta several trauma of atotiqaiii;. among there
ere bricks front the ruius of Bstryloil. i pieCe of the
cannot wed is the buiWiugs of that city. a piece

•• • c; • •