The National Register.
London, England, 1821-04-23 00:00:00

a~

)t '

r Inn

FllO.ll TUEND.II" G.IZETTE.
BANK PTCY SUPERSEDED.
O. Hogg, Pancras Lane, tavern kclier.
BASERUri S.
W. Soaps, Lichfield, meicer. Solicitor, Messrs. Constable
and Co. Symond's Inn.
R. Hoyle., Nescastlc upon Tyne, merchant. Sols. Messrs.
Meggison and Co. Gray's Inn.
T. P. Jones, Carmarthen, linen draper. Soli. 'Messrs. Jenkins
and Co. New Inn.
W. J. Tender, Portsea. Southampton, victualler. Sol. Mr.
Can, John Street, Bedford Row.
J. White. Lambeth Road. Surrey, merchant. Sol. Mr.
Thomson, George Street, Minor',l.
T. Bonner, Monkwcarmouth, Durham, fitter. Soh. Messrs.
Bell 'rod Co. Bow Churchyard.
J. Ford, Gloucester, patent woollen yarn manufacturer and
clothier. Sols. Messrs. Buttsßeld and Co. Bouverie Street.
W. Cole, Sinniagton, York, farmer. Sols. Messrs. Eyre and
Co. Gray's Inn Square.
C. Cope Berkeley Mews. Portman Square, job master. Sol.
Mr. Coleman, St. James's Walk, ClerkenwelL
R. Ritchie and J. Bigsby. Deptford, brewers. Sols. Messrs.
Osbaldeston and Co. London Street, Fenehurch Street.
J. Greases. Liverpool, broker. Sols. Messrs. Taylor and Co.
Temple.
J. Blackband, Burslem. Staffordshire, grocer. Sol. Mr.
Hicks. Gray's Inn Square.
W. and W. S. ILWeilen, Barton upon Humber, Lincolnshire,
scriveners. Sol. Mr. Hicks, Gray's Inn Square.
T. Whitt, Brinklow. Warwickshire, innhohler. Sole. Messrs
Fuller and Co. Carlton Chambers, Regent Street.
T. Burbery. Woolston, Warwickshire, grazier. Sols. Messrs.
Fuller and Co. Carlton Clambers.
J. Whitchurch, Worship. Street, Finsbury Square, coach
master. Sol. Mr. Dimes, Friday Street, Cheapside.
J. Masters, Upper Berkeley Street. Portman Square, coach
maker. Sol. Mr. Dunn, k. Swithin's Lane. _

J. isurniter.Charlottel;treet, Old Street Road, stone mason.
Sol. Mr. Phillips, King Street, Covent Garden.
D. Pulko, Birchin Lane, broker. Sob. Messrs. Courteen
and Co. Walbrook.
DIVIDENDS.
May 12. J. S. Smith. Brighthelnistone. druggist-19, B.
Glasscott. Cheapside, jeweller-19, W. Blackburn. Blackburn,
Lancashue, sbopkerper-11, T. Hadley, Birmingham, dealer—
]3, J. M. De Quinn, Size Lane, Buckkisbury, merchant-8.
W. Davies. Caerphilly, Glamorganshire, woollen manufacturer
.-10, R. Sallow., Hadlogh., Suffolk. grocer—lL S. Bowring and
S. Tint, Cheapside, Ineerdashers-23. J. Avison. Brighouse,
York, grocer-19,J. lisides. Blackburn. Lama/hire, druggist.
CERTIFICATES to be granted May h.
J. Graham, CroolotdLoas, upboisterer—T. Hughes, Bennett
Street, St. Janne., Dealtry, RawelifFe, York,
fanne—J. P. Mammal, Lemke Street. merchant—T. Rome,Liverpool. optician-11. aindl, Bath, slionnaker—W. King,
Ipswich, maltster—J.latisid. Edward Street, Cavendish Square,
surveyor—W. Wilkinson. Blackburn, Lancashire, cotton manu-
facturer.

DESTINATION 01 REGIMENTS.—As several re-
giments are now about to change their destination,
the fullott ing list, it is expected, may be found use-
ful to many of our readers
4th dragoons and 18th hussars, to India.
Bth as 17th light dragoons to come home front India.
Ist hatt. royal Scots, from Ireland to the Mauritius.
13th, 41st, and 44th. from home to India.
38th ar.d 54th, from the Cape ei Good Hope to India.
33d and 91st regiments, from ! JMC to the West Indies.
49th and 55th ditto, from home to the Cape of Good Hope.
58th and 61st ditto, come home troin the West Indies.
6th regiment to St. Helena.
75th regiment from the lonian Isles to Gibraltar.
Slat and 85th regiments, tiom home to the Mediterranean.
82t1 regiment from the .Mauritius to Mille.
17th, 53d, 59th, and 65th regts. come home from India.

ilk

Extract of a letter dated Cape Hayti (St. Do.
mingo), Feb. 28.—" We have lived in great agita.
ion here for several days; a conspiracy of which
the ci-devant Duke de Mamielade, at present the
Governor and Commandant of De Place, and Gen.
Richard, a sanguinary negm, were the principal
contrivers, was accidentally discovered on the eve of
its being carried into effect. The objects were the
overthrow of the government, the plunder and mur.
der of all the whites and mulattoes The ring-
leaders had the good fortune to escape from the fury
of the exasperated populace, but were sent in chains
to Port-au- Prince to undergo their exclamation.—
The troops had been worked up in a state of frenzy,
and only ly the great and indefatigable exertions
of General Manny could be restrained from plun-
dering : some excesses have, however, been com-
mitted, especially in the adjacent country, where
robbery and murder is still going on.
We find by a letter from Leghorn of the 3d, that
a most respectable English merchant, a nephew of
Sir R. Peel, has been ordered to quit that city and
state at twelve hours' notice, for presuming to doubt
the truth of an Austrian bulletin! Such conduct is
better calculated for the meridian of Tunis or Al-
giers than that of Tuscany, which has long been
considered as one of the mildest of the arbitrary sort
in Europe. The expulsion of this gentleman for
the crime of " incredulity" has produced a deep
sensation, and created a considerable alarm among
the English residents at Leghorn, more especially
as the arbitrary mandate had been proceeded by no
notice, called for no explanatiou, and admitted of no
remonstrance, or expostulation—off he was obliged
to go, probaLly to the ruin of his business and Mr-
tune. The British factory, and the general body
of British residents, have seen the magnitude of the
inconvenience, and the extent of the danger Which
this treatment of Mr. Peel warrants them to appre-
hend, and have taken up the matter accordingly.
Accounts from Hanover assert, that Lord Castle-
reagh has audounced officially to Count Munster,
that his Majesty would visit Hanover in August.—
We much doubt the fact, or at least if such is in the
contemplation of his Majesty, it will be preceded by
some legislative measure in parliament.

THE NATIONAL REGISTER

3nivertal Varilanttnt.

•
HOUSE OF LOROS.
• MONDAY. •PRIL
Petitions against the Roman Catholic hill were pre-
,rated from the clergy of Itaih—lit ktol—Noi folk—
Woodstock—and the Roman Catholics of Limerick.

Earl GREY presented two petitions from the Boman
Catholics of England—one declaring that his Alajesty's
right to the throne was indisputable, end that they never
would admit the interposition of ally foreign influence to
shake their loyalty and attachment. The second petition
was from Lords blire‘ssbory, Petre, Arundel, and other
Roman Catholic peers. Both were in favour of the bill.—
The petitions were read, sad laid on the table.
The Earl of DONOUGHMORE then rose, on the order
of the day for the second reading of the bill, and com-
menced his speech by observing, that the Roman Catholics
of Ireland had suffered under severe intolerance up to
1793, when they were admitted by the legislature to the
right of elective franchise, and promotion in the army and
navy. Concessions bad bet ti previously spoken of, but in
fact no concessions were made. In the present instance
a bill of Mercy and grace had come up from the other
house. It, however, no sooner passed the threshold of the
house, than the noble lord on the woolsack, and the noble
lord at the head elate triasury,denonneed it. He trusted
he should hear, in the course of the debate, the principles
on which those noble lords had taken as, lie considered,
an erroneons view of ihe subject. Would the lords not
condescend to give due consideration to a bill which in
the other house of pat liament had gone through the ordeal
of five weeks debate? Alter the deliberate sense of the
other house, taken upon the measure, what could the
house do bet give a bill of such vital importance, at least
that discussion the subject was entitled to ? He was the
mote surprised at the opposition of the two noble lords,
because it was not usual to express opposition to the prin-
ciple of a bill before - the second reading. Upon the
authority of the other house of parliament, lie asked the
lords to discuss this subject. Four millions of Irish Ca-
tholics, containing in that number the most respectable
names, requested to be heard, and not sent away from
parliament. Under the sanction of oaths, his Majesty's
Roman Catholic subjects had abjured disloyalty. They
had not done so by one oath, but a succes►ion of oaths.
They had taken oaths, and proved themselves trust-
worthy. When the act of 1793 passed, it had the full
approbation of his Majesty's ministers. They considered
the Catholics trust-worthy. They bad been in possession
of the elective franchise 28 years. That act said in plain
terms, I. We will try you, and hereafter open to you the
doors of the constitution." He did not speak disrespect-
ful of the constitution as a Protestant constitution. It
was the object of his veneration, but he wished all the
members ed it to have participation in all its privileges.
The doors should be opened to the Catholics to enjoy
equal rights, and at the time the admission was allowed,
the C btliolic should not be insulted un the subject of his
religion. The noble. earl read a document proving the
alteration the Pope had made in the oath to be taken by
the Roman Catholic bishops. Wards were left out for
the purpose of inserting others, which state that nothing
in the said oath is to shake the fidelity such bishop owed
to the king and government under which he is placed.—
There never was a bill in parliament discussed with more
moderation and temperance than this bill had been iii the
Commons. The bill, in fact, gave nethiug—it only restored
those constitutional rights of which the Catholics had been
deprived, but which no man could say ought to be no w
withheld. The Protestant establislhm.•nt was undoubtedly
entitled to support; but the bill, if' it passed, would nut
prevent the King holding those safeguards which the
constitution required. A Protestant king would never
prefer Roman Catholic conosellors. Conceiving the Ro-
man Catholics were trust-worthy, he could not consider
the second part of the bill necessary. He could not con-
sider the Catholics suspicious. They had been in posses-
sion of the elective franchise Y 8 years, and the good use
they had made of it was security for future good conduct.
He wished therefore the second, or restrictive part of the
bill, expunged. They waisted no fresh securities. They
were told they had a disaffected belly of clergymen—he
knew that the reverse of that character belonged to the
Catholic clergy. Hr had too smelt respect for those who
introduced the securities, not to think they had a good
opinion of the Romeo clergy. 'fumy must have supposed
those securities were not canted, but thrown out as a tub
to the whale. It was too much to expose a respectable
body of the clergy to the odium and daimon of the mul-
titude.—The noble eau l then observed that it would, per-
haps, have been snore reasonable to reset we his objections
to the restrictions till the bill came belore a con 111 l ittee,
but as he did nut hear from the noble lords that they
would permit the bill to go to a committee, he could not
w ithlitod his opinion respecting the alteration. The first
clause imposed the penalty of au oath. lie did nut like
the imposition of au oath. At the commencement of the
French revolution a compulsory oath was taken by cler-
gymen. They took it to avoid deportation. The opinion
ur all sensible men since that period had been, that the
oath ought never to have been inforced. The oath in the
bill before the house was to be taken, or the part/ would
be liable to prosecution for a misdemeanor. He eThjected
to it because it was wholly usnieceiriary to catty into
effect the machinery (tithe bill—whether the Roman Ca-
tholic clergyman was sworn or not, lie would nut resort'.
mend any person to be a bishop ur dean Hitless he knew
that person to be a loyal person. 'rite other t estrietions
also came tinder the noble earl's observati 111 l , and lie con-
tended that there was nogtoubd for any restitutions. The
Catholics were not suspicious pet sons, curveguently they
ought not to lie treated with suspicion. He dad out he.
heve any individuals weir to be tutind more ready than
Roman Catholics to du their duty. At the same tune he
was ready to say, he did not wish the Catholic* to t humph
aver the Pi otestaists on this occasion. He thought they
ought to give some mods:drat, some satislavtiuu to sOOlll
the pm epadice of Pt idestanis. He 'birdied himself, how-
ever, to nothing of that sort. He considered the securities
requited 'millet:cases y and unjust; therefore he could not
call on any body of int it to give thesis. The want of the
veto requited by the bill could never, in his opinion, pro.
duce the least danger. The noble rail concluded a speech
of emisideiable Italia) by moving the second reading to
the

Lord MANSFIELD said, the bill divided had two ob-
j.•ets—one part admitted Catholics to the privileges of the
.1414.—the other imposed testtictious. With respect to
those resit tutiotts, Ilia experience led him to believe that
the Homan Catholics or licland w mild never be satisfied

with restrictimet; they required unlimited access to all
public etc.s. In case they obtained that liberty, they
%stolid nest moire the restoration of their clergy, and
pet Imps the ql;lte‘ nf the church which had been seized.
Person■ enn!d have but little foresight or knowledge of
mankind, If they doubted the real feeling of the parties.
Toleration in every sense would be required, and the Pro-
testaut ascendancy would in the end be lost. Tne Pres-
byterlan form of worship bad been the established religion
of Scotland. The Catholic religion was established in
Ireland. Both, perhaps, should be tolerated, and con-
cessions made by the l'rotestant established religion; but
the question would be, whether, in making these conces-
sions, they would not eudanger the constitution, and make
way for a new religious establishment? Restrictions in
the bill were, in his opinion, necessary. The house could
could not deprive the bill of its Aati•Calnolic character
without destroying its very essence.
The Marquis of BUCKINGHAM supported the claims
of the Catholics.

The Bishop of CHESTER opposed the bill.
The Bishop of NORWICH considered it inconsistent
with the self-denial and seclusion from the world which
the Christian religion required in a bishop to come for•
ward on any question of party politics. He had been
accused of ambitiously pushing himself forward on this
question; but he felt lie had only discharged his duty as a
conscientious member of the church. Humanly speaking,
he might never have another opportunity of addressing
their lordships. He asked, then, what church it was that
was to he supported by disabilities and penalties? None
could venture to say that it was that church of which the
the Law-giver and Head had declared that his kingdom
"was not of this world." (Loud cheers.) Christianity
prohibited every harsh, severe, and uncharitable opinion.
If no other passage of the New Testament enforced this
liberality, it would be sufficient to the terms in which the
divine founder of chtistianity reprimanded his disciples,
who had falsely imagined that their religion was to be
supported by judicial interpo•:tion even from heaven,
when lie told them that they did not know what matter of
religion they were of. (Hear, hear.) If any thonght
their church could not be maintained without disabilities
and penalties on millions of men, they had reason to fear
either their church was bad, or theyl were in error as to
the means of supporting it. None was more anxious titan
lie for the support of the chinch of England; lie would
venture his life for the truth of its doetriues anal the wis-
dom of its discipline. But the most Christian means of
upholding it lie conceived to be, not disabilities and pea.
nalties, but learning and exemplary conduct on the part
of the clergy (hear, hear, hear), kindness, candour, mo-
deration, and forbearance, ou the part of all its members.
(Great cheering.)
Lord REDESDALE opposed the bill. No security
whatever was held out for the establishid religion in this
bill.
The Earl of HA RROWBY supported the bill at consi-
derable length, after which
The Emil of LIVERPOOL said, that whatever might
be the ultimate deeistun of their lordships upon the goes-
tion, it was of the utmost importance that it should appear
to have undergone the fullest investigation. He should
be sot ry that stay noble lord should he prevented, by
want of opportunity, from expressing his sentiments, and
therefore moved that the house should adjourn till
to-morrow.

Adjourned at half past 12 o'clock.
TUEEDDAY, APRIL i 7.
A petition was presented (Join the owners and occupiers
al laud in the county of Cardigan, complaining of agricul-
tural distress.

Petitions were prerented from the clergy of Brecon—the
clergy of Leicestershire, &c. against 03 Roman Catholic
du ems.
A report was presented from the commissioners for build•
ine new churches.
Lord HOLLAND pr rented u petition from certain Pro.
testant dissenters, against the Murtiage Act. Laid on ib.
table.

Rooms CATHOLIC BILL.—The Bishop of St. DAVID'S
rose tot the order of she day for renewing ;he debate on
the Roman Catholte,Bill, and /listed hisobjection, on the
ground that it eon a proceeding to whirls lie could not as-ent
without a violation of his oath. It appeared to him to have
a most pernicious tendency. The restrictions imposed oaths
which no Roman Catholic clergyman could take without a
sacrifice of all his l'tilf4ioUl feelings. Seeing danger in the
operation of the 11/eil,Uft'S, and the little sincerity it would
obtain, he was disposed to reject it in logo.
The DUKE of YORK root to deliver his sentiments upon
this que,titoit. His Royal IliAluiess observed, that the house,
was culled upon to sanction it nieasuie which would operate
us a repeal of all the laws and Pi otestutit seem sties brought
in by the revolution of 1685, and which placed the fatuity
of his Invsent Majesty on the throne. The more be had
runsitkred the object of the bill, the more lie was disposed
to a: jest to it* The illustrious Duke expressed a hope that
their lordships would not coma& r him opposed to toleratiou.
lie mos a friend to universal toleration; and would ever
promote the free exercise of religious worship, but he was
obliges) to consider the wide difference between toleiation
and a struggle rot political patter. (Hear bear.)
Earl DARNLLY felt that the constitution would in no
respect be eurlangeted by passing the bill There could be
no fair pretence for denying the Ruivan CIO holies of (rebind
a fair and equal partucipat tun in the rights and privileges of
the constitution they haul so often fought to maintain. If
any furs should be reitiiged, utter passing the bill, the Pro-
testants mould have the remedy tin their own hands—they
formed a bilge majority, and consequently would be able at
all all lilacs to rtiatiato any (Linger a hick might by accident
arise from the lull.

The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that night it was his
fussiness to remove some of the prejudices entre mined by
the advocates of the bill. The uptestion was, whether the
bill, with its provisions, ought to be read a second time?
Now, upon that question, said the noble and learned
lord, " I defy any HIM) who know, the law of the country,
and the principles of the constitution, to pass this
It is impossible for any man in my judgment, to pass a
bill with the provisions in this bill." It had long been his
painful ditty to oipose similar measures. His opinion
upon the subject was ihts—parliament ought to go into
committee to consider what was to be done with the
claims of the Reiman Catholics, butt those who thought.
they could alter the essential fundamental principles of
the cuti AA i;; Ilion of the country, were bound not to throw
the weight of the question upon a committee, but propose
some general principle for the adoption of parliament.—
He could never bear to hold out hopes to the Roman Ca•
tholics which he knew could not be realized. The key
stone of the arch of the constitution was taken away by

1I

ilia very language of the bill then upon their table. The
noble mil had mentioned the opinions in favour of such
a measure entertained by Mr. Pitt and other high autho-
rities. There lived not u man who had a stronger regard
for the late Nlr. Pitt than himself; and after the union
with Ireland, lie never would have differed from Itim OU
the a:lWe' of Doman Catholics, had he not been per-
suaded that great man took an erroneous view of the sub-
ject. He never did hear nor ever could hear from him,
what were the securities lie proposed fur the safety of
the Protestant government and Protestant church. It
pleased Divine Providence to take LAM illustrious states-
man. Mid another great snail:, then in the house, for whom
be had the strongest friendship (Lord Grenville), became
the friend of the measure. He asked the house after all,
whether they had not come to this:—that they were to
snake concessions without any securities?—(Hear, hear,
from Lord Grenville.) He should he ready to hear the
noble lord. If they had securities, he was quite ready to
admit they ought to pass such a bill. One of the first
duties of statesmen was to take care of the religion of
the country. They had been told to look at political
Motives only, but his opinion was, that the established
eligion of the country was one of the greatest political
rbjects they had to consider. If this happy land had
ofotunately adopted a system of church government, the
mildest recognised in any church in the world, the mem-
bers of that chinch were hound in duty to secure civil
liberty. They could not pass the bill withoui repelling
the test and corporation acts, which, in the opinion of
the greatest lawyers, where the shield and, protection of
the constitution. The hill before the house went to re-
peal the Supremacy act • as well might they destroy the
Mill of Rights. Magna Chlirta, and ether securities upon
which the coustliation was founded. The oath of alle-
giance iu the bill gave no set urity. Why was the Pro-
testant to give a stronger oath than the Roman Catholic
The Protestant swore the Pope had nu authority at all.—
The Catholic swore with a reservation on that point.
Lord GREN VILLE, in a speech of considerable length,
abounding in force of argument and eloquence, supported the
bill, and contended that no dodger to the established reli-
glen could arise from granting the Catholic claims, whilst
much public good would result from that measure.
Lord LIVERPOOL could out conscientiously give his
support to this measure, consistent with the safety of the
established religion. The noble earl Intik the same line of
igriestut against the bill as the Lord Chancellor had pre-
viously done.
The Marquis of LANSDOWNE said, the time was now
arrived at which, in his opinion, they might, without any
danger to the establishment, grant to the Catholics their
claims, and by so doing unite the talent and increase the
strength of the Empire at lunge,
Lord SIDMOUTH apposed the motion,
Lords Melville, Ashburton, and Somers supported the hill.
Strangers were then ordered to withdraw, and the house
divided : when there appeared.—
For the second reading l2O
*phut it 139
Majority....... • 000000000000
Adjourned at halt-past three.

wmixEsnar. arms, I4_
The bank cask ptynuonts bill, and the charitable landc transfer
bW. ppuasaacedd through committees, and were _reported • without
ituuttdwent, tuljoumod.
rtittasnaw. APRIL 19.
The royal assent was given by commission to the beer duties'
bill, the oulkeepora.' bill, the lrsh law of treason ametultuent
bill. and about forty private bills. The commissioners were, the
Marquis of Cholmondcley, the Lord Chancellor, and the Earl of
Shaftesbury,
The Londan gas light and coke bill. and two others, were
ht up from the Commons and read the first time.
114 i. 'knock prwekneil an account of the addition made to the
public debt during the last ten years.
On the nation of the Earl of Shaftesbury, the house adjourned
W Tuesday the lit of May:
•••••••••••laMMI

HOUSE OE COMMONS,
uospax, Aram Hi.
Mr. S. C. WHITBREAD presented a petition from
freeholders of Middlesex, praying fur parliamentary reform.
Mr. Sergeant ONSGOW presented a bill to repeal the
uiury lows, Read a first time, and ordered to be read a
second lime May 10.
Mr. M, A. TAYLOR rave pollee, that PP May 30, lie
should submit a motion to amend ear mode of itdministering
Joliet, in the Court of Chancery, also of enforcing the appel-
11101,1uriudiction in the house,
Mr, Sy K ES presented a petition from the ship-owner, of
Mull, pret)tag fur a Ceptiti of the w duty which
he considered must Injurious to the microl inirrelts of the
country. He lamented that pone of the ministers were pre.
sent to bear tide petition read, because it well merited pecu-
liar alteotioo. Petition ordered to be printed.
Inlitt altroltu PeriTtorr.—Air. LANIUTON presented
patitloo from lOU inerchauts, 4c. of Belfast. The pelt,
turd preyed eroeri,il) tor rehires, urging, dint the petitioners
del net conaider the house In speak the w popular voice ;"
And they lamented the ii rumours" that were circulated, that
Wale were bought Inn' SW, mid that ministerial majorities
were swelled by placemen,
Volition read, I:made" praying fur Worm, it likewise
Called far the restcoution of the Duero to he, sights. It alto
aid that 1V percnn. in made Om rclUtii to the writ,
iltition ordered to be printed,
411111•14#TURII aril fnaoti.--Mr. BI.LICE presented
li petition Irmo merehauts in Landau, trading to Canada,
Slating that alteration of the timber duties would suliject
them to ruiesan difficulties, which would prevent them Irian
raueuchig the customary reiuros. tic r.qpiciesl toe purlieu-
r attention of the ',hokum of Cs,: :int 'cultural committer
(Mr. hooch) to this hrtliiun, for the returns of curs' glom
capadit were no; likely to elle"' the Eiy,;iish grower, Thery
was a difference its quality and expense ut near 40a. Iretweeli
the cure of Unload and that of Canada. That solely was
protection enough to the i iigli.h wooers i any restrictiuu
would be ruitiou. to the corner') w era uf Cio,ada,
Lord MILTON said, he hoped fur a report slain from the
committee on agricultuie. lie Ow trusted that 111 e liisl
report would lain the ranialittee's upinia.is, fur lie un-
derstood that their 'inquiries bad been pi num ily dirt vied to
the extent of actual ;Hares* olongs' Inc lie coil.
eluded with whim the hue, chat; ail, when a fellolt 1111,01
be expected,
Mr,1,400C11 replied, he uppieheuded 11st soon atter the
holidays the should be prepared n ith a repot t.
Mr, MABRY AT supported site petition. With the poi-
posed alterations, the cut:mists could Hot exist,
Mr. (1, BENNETT said, that the point ut issue was, that
few imerestsff lyarlesiniii. the II shipping interests," rer,
sluiced the pool. of 4(s). Ocil, is yep', Hu cu 11,,) on the
twat., scutltautu t 0 lisise their .tatid apsii.:l his, nib 110..1