The National Register.
London, England, 1819-06-21 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COU:IT OF BENCII. SATURDAY. JUNE If.
eit oc ER v. t•nrn EMMA..
This was an ititpotteht case to teiviiits and land-owners ' It wee
an :ection brought on 6.- act of the [ICJ of Gr.... 11. e. 1 i w if.
Wirt:tied to protect Lindl cols from collusion hetweei, their tenante
and others, to put them cut of poss.wsiou of their 'impiety. The
se: provided. that any tenant being eervaal with a rotice of elect-
icceut from premises which he held b. any one except his landlord.
and giving up
.posi.ession to the ;cram serving him wi h s'ou'l
proceedings in ejart tent, without giving notice to his landlord.
should therehe stilthvt himself to arfeit to his landlord three
thrice the amount of one year's improved .w tack rent of all the
premises demised to or holden by him. The defendant, in the
present case, held of the plaintiff certain premises. consisting of
sninee and waste land, and having been served by a person named
erunnin•rhavi, with a priers* in ejeemprit as related to the mines.
.end without y;ieing any notice to the plainiitr, he let to the sheriff'.
tend gave poswwsieni to Cunningham. The pluinti:!', in conse-
eptence, comtnenced the present action. In lip declaration, how.
ever, he only described the mines, and did not mention the waste
I end : the duty, hwever. remind a verdict for 4.31511. tnree nines
Cie amount of the Tent of all the premises demised to or holden
d the plaintiff by the defendant.
Mr. Jervis now contenthel, that this verdict could not stand ;
the p'aintiff must be bound by his declaration, and in justice
wadi; tic be so: since the defendant hail only given up the posses:-
vim of the mines, the justice, of the case would be met by giving
hree times the amount of rent paid for that part of the property
belch by
The Coon . however. were decidedly of opinio:. that, tinder the
wont* of the act, " all premiers demised or holden," the plaintiff'
was entitled to recover the full amount of three times the amount
tit die iiiirroved or rack rent of all the premixes held by him. and,
tiierefore. that the cricket of 4,50101. was right. The rule for A
trial was theretbre refitsed.
Tt. esti w, Juice 13.
Till ALIS.G e. RottLitTii.
The Common Serie .iit moved wide a criminal informa-
lam agaimt Ouch Rub-sets, a ,tir.con and apoihreary, at
ColtliatVoll. lielienrcde the application en the installer of a
pei 1111 l named Kennedy, steamed to Sir Peter launch. It
swim areal, twit Robert, had brio called to 11.4esia wee of the
d•iinesties in Sir Peter Darrell's family, and his blip
PAW, a dispoie acne bet aeon I and Kennedy. Clam a
Swiday , when 1v.% wily aas coming hid n cougreget 1111 l of
Juniper , 111 a ideh he Ihr. 1111 l gel!, Mr. Robed is
art him, and used abn.nr language. The newt day be
Si rote dim a tette r, in a Ilieh be iveol h.' ors- obliged to keep
at a dulante from him to avoid toe h. otee filth., and ll gli
be Keened), wine a Sc iii a %%den row 11, he would
;eye hl,ll Isiah eat isfue . This wB5 EMU( Ueli iillsl A chat-
le .re (II light a duel, acid •he court aas moved act untimely.
Ittelaert-, it was islteged„ carried pi•tols, and the deponent
considered his lie., in clanger.
Mr. Jos; ire Bay ley said, there was nit ground for a crimi-
nal information. If Mr. Kennedy considered his life
t lireattaed, he height apply Is the quarter SeMilt/lia• the
a, p I i eat ion alias refused.
Till KING e. CARLISLE.
The defendant Wile up to plead to two informations for
and au iudietineut fur a seditious libel we-
ltered cad term.
Hr was asked if lw was ready 1,1 plead, and he put in au
al6dav it st that the putslitation 1/11 %his' is Was ill11111111:11.
[ions were founded. were the ensue n its se tea 55bit'Is fOlllllYr
priweedines sigeinst him acre inetiruted. '1 hey urge uuly
adopted upon a sw salines letting.
Me. Justice Ltayely inked i 1 they were published at the

6411111•11111 e•
fbr defendant Clllll3 not 'ay they were published at the
same time; ha they aisle the same subject to a letter.
Mr. Justice II ,y ley stssf, tiles were oisti.iet punlications;
and if he went on 'subliming., they tuOit exhibit 'stemma-
lions. for every one so published.
'the detendain nail b.f..° told on a former day that some.
fist hear stce might be expected in taste hr did not publish
tiny more.
Mr. Carlisle said, he could not consider himself guilty of
au OMMICI• until the Jury foutol the pu'.ll, at ion soboisise.
.Ir. Justice Bayley ob.rnrdr thst he nit4itt nod himself
mistaken.
The Chief Jtoti.-e ohserted, that full tune bad beer) given
lii plead, 611111 the court could gibe ins smu'.•.
'flu :defendant then pleaded - Not (Milt,.
•PCIOHT r. all V a it ise •
111•. flurney moved tar a rule to spew cause why there
should nut be a new trial en this case.
' It IA as as action for seduction, tried last-brims
Mr. tourney moved, tat the.round that de, plaintiff, who
was the father sits the young woman s.•ducrd, you d not have
been deprived of tier seix.eis, Matsuura-it as she was in the
service of the defendant beinse:f.
The court gritilieil a rale to thew cater.
LOMU CIIC aCHILI. v 1I!•KT.
Mr. W. 1.1.1 Ills moved for a rule to shoo faille, why the
verdict a hieh hod been found in thiscase should Dot be ens
titsred fin the defendant, on all the counts of the declaration.
Thiv. he said, was an action for a Ibel, and the Jury found
th it the aeci•lesit happened by the furious driving of the
plaintiff. All the comas of the de. la rat toil charged the de•
fend-int with a libel " of and coneerising the said 1111 idrlll."
which 11 ippenifti a ithout furtims 1•1111114 .111 e learned
counsel contended, therefore, that the Jury found for the
defentlatit on every issues for they found that tar aerideal
happened by the furittssllrisi,ug of the Malaita. To follity
this argument, be cited the irit.e of the King e. Mine,
whi h was ti ied before Lord Alaissfield. It was an info' lila-
toot for a libel coureriiitig his hl,ije,t's (iiiverionimt, and
roacerning the employniet.l of his wasps. llw case wss
removed bs h uric of error to the !louse of Lines; mid
Lord Chief Ja.tice De (ire) then said, that if the Jury
f .sand its title libel was nut tip n bo Aljesty'• Cinvernmeet
and the employment of his troops, the information was
false. 111 pteroost ease, the tleuldrof ion staled. lbw the
accident happened oithout any negligence, or
s driving, on the loot of the plait:ill; and •i the Jury
bail firmed the turioel this-log, it appealed that their indiug
antittuotcd to as rot it e verdict for the defendant.
Tile litassied Judges said, it appeared to them that the
mod acrid. lit wits used to signify the evt ut that of-rutted,
mutely, the railliviou sit alit -carriages. Ibe allegation in
the intrudes. tory pall of Ihe declarrition aas a divitrhie al.
le tttt , rind the plAirttit way nut bound to prove the whole
Ail his iiitroductsuy manor.
The applicsaiuu war necuillin,ly refused.

FitiDAY, JUNE 18.

MON COFFINS.
Soon after Mr. Jul.tive Holrnsrl had taken his seat Klan
the Bench this morning, Al r. morel for a mantlamns
to be is,tiell to the acting ministers of the partial of tid,
Andre fiolbot it, and the Lime, ho order's and sex ton of
palish, directing thew to bury the turibe tot' Mos.