The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1820-08-23 00:00:00

LONDON, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 23,

to what use it was applied? (The answer was too olreDalVe
to repeat).
Does witness remember Wog at the Cooireot of Benedic-
tion at St. Almelo ! Yea.
Dues he remember seeks the Prieesss at breakfast there ?
Yes.
DiJ the Prisons loreskfest shore, or with Bergaini ? With
Benson.
Dues witne s remember soy thing pussies or bring dons
there by Beeseesi? Nulling was duo, that witness I.OIIIIIIF,
breed.
Where did witness omit the envies lir the Princess ? 4.
Pesaro.
How beg since? Three rem Irk
When witness left the service of the Prioress whets
he? To Sidon.
Into whose Derek* did he ester? Tibet of the 111101001
Erhe Ortesealchi.
How beg did he remain to Italy after goisilog rbi
vke of the Primes? He could mot miletalier ; perhaps
or Rye months.
• Does offline remember got/ with the Prisons to Paris
Yes.
At whet Is. did theyisdgw in thee plisee? H. did two
remember, hut it was the into en the right hated aide es en-
timing Paris.
Dues witness remember when the Princess was at Naples,
Bergami being out on horseback ONO termitic and the Prin-
cess asking for him? Hr remembered it trio well.
[The Interpreter amid, that pin &mid weal In comment
either for very well, or tow well. The Interpreter said that
the Queen's Attorney-General had objected to the word
kappa yesteidsy, and therfere he offered the two 'tiptoes-
'does. Mr. Brougham said, that he had not ohj•cted to the
wind froppo, but to the use in which it wee given in inter-
pretation.]
During the time that Berganii erns out on horseback, did
the Princess inquire for him? Yes.
(It was asked by lord Eamtite at what time this oc.
curved. Lord LITIMPOOL auawered, its November or De-
cember, 1614.]
thi the return of Bertrand from riding, did witness coos-
nmaicate to Berganti that the Prioress wanted him? Yes.
Was the Princess al that time above stairs in her bed-
room? He did nut know, be was below in the court.
In consegortice of the eireetweuicasioo, that the Prince*"
wasted him, did Bergalni go up stairs to her bed-meow?
Mr. Brouebsin objected to this epiestion, because it sit-
rooted that the list question. as to the listowkdge of the
witness, had been answered its the
The LORD Cdsvosu-wi said, that the question was pat
as a leading one. It ought to be, " Did Berge's' go up
into her bed-room?"
The question was at lesith pet—Where did Bergsma go ?
[The 'wiles", was detailing a CO•Vrillalion which evened be-
twixt him did Bergami oa the oceastoe.]
Mr. Brougham said that this could sot be evidence unless*
iteennected the presence of the Process with Bergsma at it
occurrence.
The Solicitor-General submitted that it was subject of
evidence.
Lord ERIPLINe said, that it could hare se easseetion
whatever with the ease, if it only proceeded fres the mouth
of Berguni without the presence of the Queer.
The LORD,CII•XCELLOR mid, that it might be evidence.
Bet that it must be gives en question regularly pet.
Where went Bergaini ? To his own rams.
After entering it whet did he do ? He shot the doors.
Did be merely close them? He locked them.
Does witness recollect how bag Brigand remained there ?
About these-quarters of as lemem N Wm.
Did he see the Princess below stelfitisrlog that period ?
No.
Witness bad in a former part of his evidence described the
arrangements as to sleeping-rooms is the villa D'Este, was
any change made after their return from Orem? Yes.
Does witness know what changes were made In the apart.
meots 1 Yes; he remembered them.
Was there any evenmunicatioe betwees those of the Prix.
ens and &egotist ? Yes.
Were the apartments of the rest of the suite at a distance
front them? They were" more far."
Was there any door which, being closed, shut off all tom-
=imitation between the spermicide of the rest of the house
and those of Ikrgami and the Princess? Yes; when that
door was locked none could enter.
Du,s witness remember any alteration of the wall in et.
reefing the communicative between these last apartments?
Did not well remember.
Was there • theatre at Trieste ? Yes.
Did the Princess act at it ? Yes.
With Bergami ? Yea; had seen Bevgavni and the Prin-
cess there, but never remained during the performance of
the comedy.
On their arrival at D'Este and subservient residence, was
the Princess usually visited by the Nobility, hy the persons
of diatinctioe in that part of Italy ? I don't remember.
Does witness remember a person of the name of Mehemet ?
Yes.
What countryman was be ? He was of Jaffa.
Was be taken on board the vessel at Jaffa? Yes.
Did he remain with the Princess the whole time in which
wheelie was with her at D'Este? Yes.
Can he tell of any exhibition which _Mehemet was in the
habit of making before the Princess which be never used
what she was not there ?
Mr. Brougham said, that to allow this question would be
opening a door to illegal evidence, end would lead iv an ac-
tual necessity of receiving it. It would be well if the Suli-
cilorGeneral would surroutid iota questions with fewer of
those guards, which he used from a very proper motive; but
they led to much perplexity. A habit was out matter of
evidence, except it was communicated is the presence of the
Pri ; it would then be a fact of the case. But Make.
met's habit in the ahoeuce of the Queer could be no subject
for questiouiog.
Do's witness remember the Princess being present, Ms.
hornet uakiug any exhibition ? Yes.• sort of fen (i~ambi).
Will witness describe the exhibition, the peat, which
Malionset made? (The Witness described it; it consisted of
• gesture and motion which are used In the Spanish jaw
dunan, and the interpreter said that they formed a pert of
a dance practised all over the East, as throe of their Lord-
ships who had travelled must very well keow.)
Mr. Brougham wished the interpreter te confine himself
strictly to the answers.
Whether either before or during the time the motion he
has described, hr mails tiny arraogement, ur say allrenlium,
or any thing as to his paatalouus, or what it wee--obriber
be did soy thing with his paataluons do net keie.
Will you ask the witness to describe the gtiochl from be-
ginning to rod—what was done from beginuieg to eod—
whether we did any thing with Ms shirt or soy other pert of
his dress?
l'he witness here polled aphis trousers.
The Interpreter. I cannot translate that, heestatto it is
• nudism, and yeti are better jade,* than I ear possibly bp,
sod I hope your Lordships will excuse me."—(Hear, Afar )
Mr. Brougham—lt is as easily translated luta Eirglish as
possible, it is rureary.—(Loud cries of " Nye se.")
By the Solicitor Geseral--Does the whams remember on
this °mobilo soy thing being dare?
The Interpreter—The wetness has not given say sewer,
he has merely made a motives which the Solkiter.Umseral
would be as able to give hinsitelt —(Lood lasphlag.)
The witness wee desperildwg insiatalibig with the paataketem,
or trousers ; I want him to describe what that was with
aceeracy—bow the browsers were prepared—whit hr did wills
the truowers—did ha do any thing to the troesees with his
lambs 'either before or dodo; the MN this mouse was plug
on? 1 have not seers it.
Ma the poeities of Me tremors the same as usual ?
Always is the same elate.
As to this Sweat, doss he reissebst In mere thou rise