The National Register.
London, England, 1822-07-07 00:00:00

€l4

• < "‘

(Imperial l'aphameot coolmurd from me 211-)
Dublin, proving for the repeal of the Irish aie..e.iseil
ordered to be printed, aftei souse renatrls from Mr. C.
Mr. i:ICOltDO inured fur accounts of the quantity of wood
imported.--Ordereil.
Mr. 11 OD.EIIOISE brought in a bill to repeal the Excise
Licences Bill, HA far us the souse regarded Matting Houses--
Resit a first time, and ordered to lie read a second time to-

morrow.
The horde' amendment* to the Marriage Bill were ordered
to he taken into consideration July 12.
31r. 111201 GIIA 51 brought in a bill to amend the laws
touching the retail Inuit, in ale and beer. It eras a measure
that be moved is conformity to u previous notice, that lie stould
propose •ucli a hill in the event of Mr. Bennet's bill in part
tailing. Read a lirat time, and ordered to be read a second on
Monday, and to be printed.
CHIEF Banos, 1 tit ha m—Lord LONDONDERRY wished
the bon. member (Mr. S. Rice) to postpone his caution respect-
ing the Chief Baron of Ire!anil (O'Grady) till the next session,
as there was not sufficient time now for its proper investigation.
The milk Lord ads vitt it to what had already lieu done to pro-
mote sufficient enquiry on the subject. SCV end documents and
reports had already been printed, and were in the hands of
atembere, but be had been unable to look through the papers as
yet, go far as to take them into consideration. Under these
Meematunres lie requested that the motion might he postponed.
a 1 r. S. HICK said he only wished to do what was consistent
with the justice of the case, and the dignity of the ailluitiistr.t.
Hon el s justice. It might be charged that an individual on the
beach had a serious allegation kept over bi a bead ; but if such
charge wore preferred, he trusted that it would nut be !event d
against him. He was prepare•l to go into the present question,
hut after what bed been said be could no► think of urging it
during the Tr, gent session. He, however, could not avoid re-
marking. that it was the duty or Government, if they thought
they hail any duties to perform, to watch over the pure aditii-
oistration of justice. Ile should certitinly bring flow:Jed the
subject oral, in the next session, if the Government in the mean
time slid not institute proper investigation and slope.
CAt.ct•TrA 11ANKFRS.-4lr. BROUGHAM ruse to move
that the petition of Mr. Pendergast on account of certain Calcutta
hankers shalt be referred to n select committee, to examine
into the allogations of the saran•. It concerned certain loans,
and the demands laid been resisted by the Governor-General,
who said that it would establish the precedent for listening to
many similar claims. Ile commuted with moving for a cola-
accortlinaly•.
'l•he motion oreinsioned a desultory debate of some hours'
duration, in which Mr. Wetheral, Mr. Hume, Mr. P. Moore,
Mr. Pendergast, &r. took part.
The House then din idol, and there appeared—For the motion,
82—against it, 39 majority in fat our of the motion, .13.
The committee was then appoint. it.
On the order of the day lot tLe second reading of the Inane-
recticn Act,
Sir R. Aa 11.30 N said lie would not impose the bill going
a stage, on condition that IS. d.-hate was taken nn the question
at this late hour, but that a ileh.ite should be taken on the
location for e apeaher-Icaving the chair.
Mr. (JUL I,IIIRN acceded to this proposition ; the bill was
read a second time, and eo...mitim with iu under-
at:mding 0111 it 6110111(1 cuM-011 early that illy
Mr. PEEL postponed the discussion on the Police Bill to a
Nine day.
The oilier orders of the day were disposed of, and the House
sejourned.

FRIDAY, JULY 5.
Mr. Q•arme, the Yeoman 1.....18,r of the Black Roth, sum-
moned the House to 'Mewl in the House of Lords In bear the
royal assent given by commission to sundry public and private
bills.—(See Lords' report.)
Mr. Alderman WOOD presented a petition from inhabitants
in the parishes of Ilornsey and Finchley against the Highgate
Chapel Bill. If the bill were pressed he should resist it,
and divide the House on it.
Mr. BROUGHAM trusted that the bill would not he pressed
forward tow. The foundation (rod ample means; it was more
richt) endowed than the school atilarrow. The bill was really
of a public nature.
Mr. BYNG said, when his turn came he should move the
reading of the bill.—Petition read.
Mr. CAL% ERT presented a similar petition from Holloway
isd Kentish Town.
Mr. BY ls.G soon afterwards moved the second reading of the
Highgate Chapel Bill.
Mr. IIUME was cut prised that this motion wax made. As it
was pressed, he should move, as an amendment, that the bill
be read a second time this day six months. The funds were
left to nodal:tin a grammar school, and to divert them to the
.building of a elrlpel was a misappropriation. Besides, there
was a suit Hauling in the Court of Chruscery on the subject;
that might lirst to be decided. The rental was between 7 aad
tttlol. • year. lie depended on the justice of the House hot
to interfere with the course of justice. He concluded with
moving an amendment, that the bill be read a second time this
day six mood's.
Mr. Alderman WOOD also opposed the hill. This bill was
brought in a second time, which was contrary to the general
practice of the House; and in favour of it they had not yet
heard one word. He wished the bill to be postponed till next
session. A clergyman might he maintained—but at present
the sexton and grave digger were the only teachers of the

boss.
air J. c uAIIAM that this bill was not to take away
the juriad;etion of the Court of Chancery ; and in that lie slid
the truth, which bed not yet been spoken on this subject. He
was Rusin's fur religions instruction, therefore he supported
this bill • he had read the Bishop of London's letter. The
chapel had long been maintained. It was in proof that the
clergyman had married in the chapel, and dune every act in it
calculated to ease the mother church.
Sir It. WILSON wished to know, if certain persons al
Highgate were auxin's% to build a chapel by their subscriptions,
why they desired to seize on the charitable funds
Alderman HEYGATE said, the object of the founder was
to establish a grimmer school and as far as lie unthistood the
bill, it was diametrically opposed to what he deemed to have
been tle• inter...an of the founder.
Mr. BROUCIIAM opposed the bill. He always looked with
anspicion at both houses interfetiug with private property
if all the mystery of private bills was untokled, such a scene
would lie opened as would frighten both Huesca and disgust
the country. -(Hear! )
Ihe ATTORNEY GENERAL opposed the motion, thinking
that the House was not the proper place in which to decide the
suestion involved in the bill.
Mr. Bti NG suppoled the bill.
Mr. WHITBREAD said be could not support the till. It
was against his advice, and that of his lion. colleague, that the bill
was :nought farwari its the present s4ssniu.—(liear.)