The National Register.
London, England, 1820-06-26 00:00:00

FRIDAY, JUNE 23.

Tait QUZEN.—Mr. BROUGHAM expressed the Lope
:hat the ki•aise would allow hint to supply an oinission
which he had made in the course cf the diticussiou which
took place last night ; aud it was a fact that he had entirely
forgotten at the time, and which had not been bt oug lit back
to his recollection till he received a eau:lamentation trout the
Queen this nsurnist,;. Amungct other arguments urged By
the Noble laird, :And others who thought with him, it wits
alleged that the question of the Lititigy was not brought
i :to discussion till late in the uegociatious. The fact ;WS,
that as soon as the Queen bad heard of the ornissioa of her
name in the Liturgy, and as soon as tile fact was cot:firmed
by the arr,val of the Gazette, her Majesty then immediately
%rate a letter limn her then rraideilee to one of the hltuistera,
eomplitiming of such proceeding. tier N:ajesty lu such cum-
ramileation, expressed ill strung language her seetitnents, and
disappridiat ion of the omission. Thus early was the disap-
probation expressed, thus early was the objection raised on
the subject of the altered Liturgy ; it however was certainly
due to all parties atsuite, tout there was no metitiuu of the
Liturgy at the commencement of the neguciatious.
Lord CA SILF.:REAGIi observed, that lie had heard of
such a lever having been son by her Majesty. It witi lint
forwarded to him ; it was acct to a Noble -Friend (Lord
Liverpoul.) 'that letter undoubtedly complained of the
omission °fait Queen's name in the Liturgy. Be, however,
had not urged that t ih• que,tiou ofthe Liturgy had tot !well
la thc Ouech's !Mod; what he hail contended was, that the
vestioh was hot iiraiight forward till late in the uegociations
that it had been pressed as if it were an after-thought.
Ileyohrl this ;John he had nut submitted coy opinion; ghat
Le said wet; founded no the contents of the papers us Ince had
been laid before the Howie. While lie tens Uri his legs lie
thought it expedient to suggest whether it would not be ad-
v.seable that the House should meet to%raorrow, fur de pur-
pose of receiving the Queen's at.swer to the resolutium.—
( Hear, hear.)—He did not mean that there should lie any
ideiewsioil on the answer, whatever it might be.—( Hear,
lireir.)—But he thought that the receiving of it on that day
w old so far fia ward the other proceedings, that it would
leave them prepared to enter .tin the discussant of them.—
(Hear; hear.)
Mr.IIIiOUGII.AM agreed on the advantage of the sag-
- litsted al raagela( Of the Noble Lord, and pat tietilariy
it should be the 'intim standing that it would not lie
',spewed t,) promote away iliseiru•toti on receiving the
answer. Tire dclav that had alreinly resulted was not
oecosioned by the Quern, but was the consequence of Ins
indisposition, and tile la lencuts of the hour at which ho
had left Ilie,liouse that morning. 0 whig to these edIISPS
he was not able to wait out her illajesty, till three o'clock
f.:is afternoon, before which et:allusions as to some t‘tib-

mitten! meii,otts could not be come to; And till that tithe
tI•N hour :or rceciving the deputation of the House of
C,mthions could not be fixed, wl.:,ch was arranged for
ec% O'CIOCIL to-mori ow mot intl.!.
:Ir. DENMAN observed, that although the statement