The Sun.
London, England, 1855-03-31 00:00:00

CLERGY RESERVES ACT.

Mr. DUNLOP asked the First Lord of the Treasury,
whether—c9midering that by the Clergy Reserves Act,
recently passed by the legislature of Canada, and as-
sented to by the Governor-General in the name of her
Majesty, it was declared in the 'preamble to certain of
its enactments that "it was desirable to remove all sem-
blance of connectisn between Church and State"—it was
the intention of the Government to cease to maintain
that connection in Canada, by no longer advising ts.er
1111,jesty to uotnivato to ViLUD./Ii• I.i,lwp ica iii tin4t
colony'!
air G. GREY said there had been no vacancy Bizige

-. •
Sir DE L. EVANS said, as the house was about to
adjourn for a fortnight, he could not let Parliament
break up without urging upon the Government the ne-
cessity of doing everything in their power to
reinforce the army, particularly by increasing the bounty
for recruits. If the army were by some such means
raised to a proper standArd the war might pM3sibly _be
brought to a speedy termination. (Hear, bear.) He saw
by the public prints that a large steam fleet was about
to be sent out to the Baltic. Now, if Government would
reduce the number of steamers by supplying their place
with gun-boats drawing small draught of water, the
steamers could be despatched to the B'aok Sea, where
they were much wanted. (Cheers.) His experience of war
led him to believe that thebest mode of operating against
an enemy was byconcentrating our forces upon one point
rather than by 'distributing our forces and making
attacks In various localitles.• He hoped efforts' would
be made to bring all our power to bear upon the enemy's
position in the Euxine. (Hear, hear.) While he was
on his legs he might take the opportuaity of adverting
to the debate last night relative to 'Odessa. It would
have required 200,000 men to do what the hon. member
for Berwick seemed to think ought to have been done
last year—viz., to occupy Odessa.; and that circum-
stance probably would explain why such a step was not
taken. It was a mistake to suppose that the posses-
Sion of Odessa had facilitated the operations
of Russia in throwing troops into Sebastopol,
as their forces were brought from an entirely different
direction. However, no time should be lost in reinforcing
the army in the Crimea to the fullest possible extent,
while every available steam-ship and gun-boat should be
sent out to the Black Sea to ce-operate with the army
against the enemy, and he sincerely hoped this sugges-
tion would not be lost sight of by the Government, dur-
ing the recess. (Cheers.)
The subject then dropped.
THE VOTES OF SUPPLY.

Mr. WILLIAMS begged to call the attention of the Go-
vernment to the great inconvenience that had arisen from
the Secretary of the Treasury bringing forward votes of
supply amounting to 2,750,000/. at half-past twelvo o'clock,
without proper notice. The grievance was net felt by him
alone, there being other gelitlerrren who did not expect
that a motion of so much importance would be brought on
at that late hour.

Lent SEYMOUR agreed with the hon. gentleman so
far that he thought it was most desirable that they should
have the opportunity of discussing these estimates, and
when they wore brought on at a late hour they could not
have an opportunity of :onsidering the form iu which they
were arranged, and of 6s:ussing them. It was little use
to have items brought forward unless they were in a form
which would enable them to discuss them under their se-
veral heads, and, when necessary, to ask for explanations
conc.:ming them. But when it was said that the Govern-
ment wore in fault, ho must take their part, and say that
they had no alternative in this case. On every night for
bringing forward the estimates so many motions were
made before going into committee, that it was impoisible
to get into committee of supply at a reasonable hour to
discuss these questions. It was most desirable that hon.
gentlemen should bring forward general questions on no-
tice of motion, and that when supply came on they should
merely bring forward those motions that had relation to
supply, and were properly applicable to tho votes to be
brought forward. (Rear, hear.)
Sir HENRY WILLOUGHBY observed that in the case
to which reference had been made the Government had de-
liberately put on,the paper two motions before going into
supply, one relating to the Sardinian loan, and the other to
the newspaper stamp. Having called attention' to an in-
crease in the inland revenue estimate of 200,0001., he
was informed that it arose from poundage ; but he found
on inquiry that 112,0001. only of it was for poundage,
36,0001. for salaries of officers, 25,0001. for buildings,
15,0001. for offices, and 12,0001. fur miscellaneous expense.
Mr. WILSON waggled of the opportunity of explaining
the course that had been pursued by the Government, and
also of complaining of the course that had been adopted to-
wards them. Those estimates had been on the table for three
weeks, on everynight tiere was notice of supply, and, more
than that, there was tie usual notice of moving particular
estimates. On Friday list he thought to get those estimates
on, but orrthat night first of all there was a motion on the
question of the adjourzment of the house, which occupied
nearly two hours.' They there was a motion on going into
committee of supply, wliCh occupied the house until twelve
o'clock, and it was obviously inconsistent with the conva-
'thence of the house that they should bring on the votes
after that hour. The nest night was Monday ; on Monday
also, there was notice of supply, and likewise notice that
those estimates would betaken on that night ; but the dis-
cussion on the newspaper stamp occupied the house until
nearly twelve o'clock. It was, however, absolutely neces-
sary that the votes shouldbe brought on on Monday night,
though of course it was (nit° competent for any gentle-
man to get up and object to the proposition for going into
supply on that occasion. If such an objection had been
made, it would be his (Mr. Wilson's) duty to explain that
it was absolutely necessary for the public service that they
should go into committee, because if they had poritponed
the committee to the period he was addressing them,
they could not report antil after Easter, and, conse-
quently, the salaries could not be paid until after the
recess. It was quite true there was no use in having
those estimates if they were not discussed ; it was the inte-
rest of the Government that they should bo discussed, and
they bad courted discussini by volunteering those esti-
mates. The notices of motion on going into supply had the
effect of enabling private members to discuss some private
measures of their own, and deprive the whole of the house
of the opportunity of discussing those items, though the
discussion of them formed a most important duty of the
House of Commons. Instead of there being ground of
complaint against the Government, be (Mr. Wilson) com-
plained that hon. members superseded the business of Go-
vernment by bringing forward their motions on going into
supply. In reply to the observation of the hon. baronet,
he begged to state that, in explaining the increase referred
to by the hon. baronet, he had said it principally arose
from time of !,<111.::1-'in, n7„l
knew that the collectors of the assessed taxes and of the
income tax were paid by poundage, and just in proportion

Colonel KNOX had received a letter from Sir Frederick
Smith, who was charged with the erection of the buildings
at Aldershott. It stated that the intensity of the frost at
the end of Febrirtry and beginning of March prevented the
use of either concrete or thick brick work for the founda-
tions, and they had no option but to proceed and lay the
sleepers in the ground. The huts raised since were all on
concrete and brick foundations; those built before would
be underpinned and made good as the season advanced.
He differed from the hon. baronet the member for Coven-
try as to the ventilation, inasmuch as there were two shaft
ventilators in each. ,He would suggest that the roofs
should be covered with felt; which would be warm in
winter and keep the sun from them in summer.
Mr. MONSELL sail-, with reference to the suggestions
for keeping a considerable proportion of the men under
tents, he had to inform the hon. member and the house
that it would be unfortunately necessary to encamp the
troops not only during the summer but the winter months,
from the deficiency of barrack accommodation; and there-
fore it would be absolutely necessary to have huts for, the
whole number. With regard to the timber used, nine-tenths
of it was Christiania deal. The Surveyor of the Ord-
nance, who had examined the progress of the works, stated
that-they-were- in a most satisfactory condition, and highly
creditable to the contractors. It bad been determined
that the roofs should be covered with asphalts and felt, so
that it might be hoped they would be thoroughly protected
from the weather.

Mr. JOHN WGREGOR thought it most unsatisfactory
that the hotise should now be called upon to adjourn for a
period of seventeen-days, looking to the extremely critical
State of affairs, to the anxious expectations as to the
Vienna Conferences and their uncertain issue, to the grow-
ing agitation and discontent of the public mind, and to the
nigh price of food in the pi inci pal towns.
,They were left
in the most complete ignorance and mystery as to the in-
tentions of the Government with respect to the mode in
which they intended to levy taxes to provide for their
reckless anti extravagant expenditure. They had now the
most complimentary Treasury beach ever known ; every-
thing was done in the best manner ; it was impossible for
them to blunder ; yet the country, and Europe in general.
he believed,' were of, opinion that they had done every:
thing ill. Government had taken on themselves, ho would
not say a criminal, but a vast responsibility, and he must
protest against their adjourning without being placed in
possession of the budget, in the name of the house and the
country.

Sir J. SHELLEY wished to bring under the notice of
the Secretary of. State ter the Home Department a case
which had appeared in the newspapers under the heading
of " Alleged death from. police neglect in the Charing-
cross Hospital." It appeared from the report of an inquest
held'on a man named Thomas Gooch, that he left borne
ene Saturday night, perfectly sober, and stating his, inten-
tion to return soon. Nothing was heard of him, however,
by his family, but in the course of the night he was found
in a court in the Haymarket with a wound on his head.
He was then taken to the Vine-street police station, where
he was said to have been 11 hours in a cell without bed-
ding, covering, food, or attention. At the end of that time
he,yvas in suck a state that a medical officer who then saw
him immediately ordered him to be taken to the Charing
cross Hospital. Soon after his arrival there he died.
It appeared.from the evidence given at the inquest, that
his stomach contained neither food nor liquor, and the
jury returned a verdict imputing neglect to the police.
He thought that his right hon. friend ought to make
some inquiry into the circumstances of the case ; and he
also wished to call his attention to the circumstance that
all persons brought into the police station, without discri-
mination or classification, were consigned to the same kind
of cells, and that they are not furnished with any descrip-
tion of bedding or covering, but contained nothing but a
'laid bench. He certainly thought a different arrangement
ought to bo made. (Hear, hear.)
Sir G. GREY would inquire into the state of the cells.
He had no doubt that inquiry had already been made into
the case which had been referred to, but as no notice of
the question had been-given he was at present unprepared
to enter into any details with respect to it.
Mr. FREWEN wished to know whether the Govern-
ment had taken, or intended to take, any steps for, the ap-
pointment of a new chairman of ways and means, as he
understood that they had lost their former chairman ?
Mr. CRAUFURD wished to know whether it was cor-
rect, as had been stated in the newspapers, that the Hon.
James Kenneth Howard had been appointed to succeed
Mr. Kennedy as Commissioner of Woods arid Forests ?
Captain BOLDERO, reverting to the subject of the en-
campment at Aide; shott, suggested that the huts employed
there should be such as the troops could themselves erect
end take down. It was also desirable that the troops en-
camped there should be taught to sap and mine, make fac-
eines and gabions; bake their own bread, kill their own
meat, and do all those many things which were of the
highest utility to an army engaged in the field, but of
which ninety-nine out of one hundred of the troops who
had gone to the,Crimea were ignorant.
Lord PALMERSTON said that the appointment of a new
chairman of ways, and means would be moved when the
house met after the Easter holidays. It was quite true
that the Hon. James Kenneth Howard was to receive' the
appointment to the vacant commissioner lip of the Woods
and Forests.

Mr. CRAUFTIRD said that ho should in that case call
the attention of the house to this appointment soon after
the i ocess.

MA.YNOOTH COLLEGE.
Mr. SPOONER gave notice that on Tuesday, May 1,
he should move for a select committee to consider the acts
in rd Mon to the college of Maynooth.

• THE BALLOT.
Mr. WILLIAMS gave notice on: behalf of the hon.
'member for Bristol (Mr. H Berkeley), that soon after the
Easter recess that hon. member would call the attention
!r.if La huilY.-;

Mr. COWAN gave notice that in the committee upon
tb.o Newspaper stamp Bill be would move amendment&

•
THE HOP DUTY.
Mr. FREWEN gave notice that after Easter ho should
mike a-motion on the subject of the hop tlutyn
THE ECCLESIASTICAL COURTS JURISDICTION.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said that, in moving for
leave to introduce It bill to abolish the jurisdiction of :dl
the ecclesiastical and peculiar courts in England and Wales
respecting wills and administrations, anti' to establish a
distinct court of probate and administration, he could not I
help being struck with the many abortive attempts which
had been made to deal with this subject. Twelve succes-
sive Parliaments had been unable to accomplish the object
sought to be attained, and he had seen at least &dozen, if
not fourteen or fifteen, bills which had been introduced to
remedy the acknowledged evils of the present state of the •
law on this subject. Ho was not sanguine enough to ex-
pect that the measure he was about to introduce was not
open to a great number of the objections that had been
urged against its predecessors ; Brit he must appeal to the
house to awaken to the necessity of accepting a measure
which put an end to the eXistina.grievance, although .it
Might not be exactly the one which every one in his theo-
retical specrilation imagined to be the best calculated for
the purpose. The necessity for some interference with the
present system had been acknowledged for a long period of
time, and had been admitted by many former cotnu issions
and committees. Anti ho wished to remark that the bill
which he was about to move for leave to introduce compre-
hended the things on which all the several committees and
commissions had agreed as being expedient. He.would-now
with the permission of the heusea briefly refer to 'the re-
commendations of those committees and commissions. In
1832 a commission, consisting of persons holding a distin-
guished rank in the common law, equity, and ecclesiastical
courts, and also of several of the right reverend prelates,
was appointed to consider the state of the testamentary
jurisdiction. In their report, which was presented in 1833,
they recommended the abolition of the diocesan and pecu-
liar courts, and the concentration of the whole testamen-
tary jurisdiction of the kingdom in the Prerogative Courts
of York and Canterbury. At the same time, they added
their unanimous opinion that it would be still bettor if it
were possible to unite these courts into one, and to esta-
blish one metropolitan tribunal as the sole seat of the tes-
tamentary jurisdiction: Iti 1333 the Real-Property (4001.
Miesionefs made their fourth report, in which they recom-
mended that the diocesans and peculiar jurisdictions should
'be abolished, and that one metropolitan court should be
established, but they differed from the Ecclesiaitisal Courts
Commissioners in this respect, that, while the latter pro-
posed still to retain the testamentary jurisdiction in the
' hands of an f cciesiastical court, the former contended that
this was within thelegitimate provinee otthe civil courts,
and they accordingly recommended that the testamentary
:jurisdiction should be transferred to theCeurt of Chancery.
A select committee which was afterwards appointed agreed
with the Ecclesiastical Courts Commissioners in recom-
mending
thatthe testamentary jurisdiction—both ordinary
and contentious—of the Whole kingdom, should be trans-
ferred to the Prerogative Court of the province of Canter-
bury ; and the same conclusion was arrived at by a select
committee of the House of Lords. The result, theta of the
recommendations of all thsao bodies of commissioners, of
great authority and experience united, was this, that there
should be one single tribunal' established in the metropolis;
and exercieing all-the authority, both ordinary and con-
tentioue, over the whale connt_ .
ry, and that it should be a
civil tribuned ; for that there was nothing either in the
origin, .the naturitof the jaristliction, the mole of its exer-
cise, or any of aler peculiarities which cheracterised• it,
which recommended its being continued in thearauds of an
ecclesiastical tribunal. He had endeavoured to, aceomplish
this as the first object of the bill he eves ab mt.te deseras.
Besides the reports of committees and t e nieassieners to
which he had already referre,a, ha merstehowever, call the
attention of the house to another. ' The second report, Of
the Chancery Commissions, which was rendered in 1851,
contained certain recommendations with reference to this
subject, upon which, however, the members of the com-
mittee were not unanimous ; for while some of- the corn-
. missioners recommended the transfer of the jurisdiction to
one central metropolitan court; which was to bo newly
'constituted for the purpose, to lea a distinct court, and to
have but a 'finite,' authority, others of the commissioners
recommended that the whole testamentary jurisdiction of
the country should bo placed in the hands of the Court of
Chancery. All the commissioners; however, concurred
in disapproving of the present system. The bill that was,
introduced in the last • session of Parliament was, to a,
certain degree, founded upon the report of this eommis-
sion. It proposed to transfer the testamentary j ttrisdietion
to,the Court of Chancery, in accordance with the reoom-
unendation of some of the Chancery Commissioners, and.
' with that contained in the repOrt of the Real Property
Commissioners in 1832. To that pl.t.n, however,,great ob
jectious were raised out of doors, where it was not under
. stood, and where it was supposed that it was proposed to
throw the testamentary business of the country into the
general mass of the business of the Court of Chancery,
and great apprehensions were- in consequence expressed
with respect to the delays and confusion which might arise
from such arrangement. He had endeavoured to meet
that difficulty in the present bill; and to render it imps-
Bible that such a misapprehension of the real object of the
' . measure should again arise. The first-thing he proposed
to do by his bill was to vest the '.vhole of the jurisdiction
iu relation to wills and the grant of letters of administra-
tion, that was, all the authority to deal with matters of
testacy and intestacy, in one metropolitan court deriving
its authority from, and exercising its jurisdiction in, the,
name of the Crown. It would be a 'civil court, and it
would be a distinct court; but for, purpoies he would ex-
plain it would be necessary that this tribunal should, as it
were, lit constituted in a court of construction and admin-
istration, should'parteke of the fullest powers of that court,
and should be a portion of that court where the duties
which were properly incident to a court of probate might
be fully and effectually discharged. He proposed that-this
court should be established in the Court of Chancery ;" but
it would be a distinct court, hailing a judge, officers, and ,a
clerk of its own, and would he called " Her Majesty's Tes-
tamentary Court." It would exercise a complete though
not exclusive jurisdiction upon all subjects relating to
the proof of wills and the grant of letters of adminis-
tration. He proposed that, attached to this court.,
there should be also in London a large and conapi?-
proposal that this
*1
courtenve
should Testamentary exercise
t; in place of the .380 or 400 peculiar or diocesan
10E, -eoxfficicues.i,reHteestarnentaiy jurislic-
id be open to .
' courts scattered all over the country. The Testamen-
tary hen,r-
tary office attached to the court WOll.
tthoe pnreocvees
necessity
yl 1 soof r
their obtain
e nlleptltosyrs.
ofl an] de smtyi sstur bajt oe nt a,
wwhi tolicontmita
ing any solicitor, proctor, or agent whatever. With respect
to those persons in the country who were unable or une
willing to come to London to prove wills, the solicitors
throughout the . country who, as commissioners of the
Court 'of Chancery, were authorised to take affidavits,
could be armed with authority to receive wills, to admi-
nister oaths, to supply information, and to require the ne-
cessary proof of circumstances requisite for the proof of
wills. They could then transmit the affidavits and the
'depOsitions taken by them to the Testamentary-office to-
gether with the will. He proposed that these commis-
sinners should be furnished with printed instructions as
to the manner in which they were to perform their duties,
and with forms of depositions, affidavits, and declarations
to be made or signed by the parties-applying for probate,
suited to the various circumstances that were likely to
occur. (Hear, hear.) • Before the passing of the Wills
Act, which came into operation on the Ist of January,
1838,- probate was a mere process for authenticating a will.
But aince that law,- the duty of the officers before whom
.wills were proved—even what was called the common
form business—had partak:n somewhat of a judicial. cha-
racter, and had not, as before, been confined to matter of
routine. These duties, no doubt, demanded considerable
experience, attention, and care fur their discharge. Ho,
therefore, thought that it would be utterly imposiible,
having regard to the important circumstances that at-
tended the execution of these duties, sto expect that they
coul I be satisfactorily performed by gentlemen acting alone
in the country, unless what. was done by them was sub-
jected to the revision, superintendence; and further. exa-
mination of appointed officers in the Testamentary-office
in London. He proposed, therefore, that althougl the
solicitor in the country would be required, as far ache was
able, to discharge these duties, yet lie would have to send
up the will and all the documents connected therewith to
the Testamentary-office in London. .When received in the
Testamentary-office in London, it would be the duty of one
of the registrars thereto examine the papers transmitted and
see that the duties of the solicitor or agent in the country
had been properly discharged. If any question arose, the
registrar would consult the principal registrar; if any fur-
. tar difficulty was felts the judge sitting in chambers would
be. consulted ; and if all the papers transmitted to London
were found to be correct and regular, the will would be
admitted to probate, and letters of probate would be sent
down to the solicitor from whom the original will was re-
ceived. But here he proposed to make an important, and
he hoped the house would 'think a valuable, alteration.
He proposed that the simple plan of printing wills should
be resorted to—(hear)—and that, instead of pending to the
party in the country the old-fashioned but inconvenient
and useless parchment copy, there should be printed at
least 50 or 60 copies of the will, and that one of those
printed copies should be transmitted to the agent entitled
to receive it. (Hear.) The advantages 'of that plan bad
already been experienced in the Court of Chancery with
regard to the printing of bills, and he thought the advan-
tage of the plan with respect to probate of wills •would be
manifest on little consideration. First of all with regard
teethe point of expense. Although at first sight it, might
appear that considerable additional expense might he in-
curred, he was happy to say that the proposed plan would
bo a means of producing economy. He found from the
charges made in the Prerogative Court - and the charges
in the diocesan courts were larger—that' the 'charge fur
making office copies of papers or parchments in the Prero-
gative Court was at the rate of 81. per folio of ninety
words ; and that charge was made for every copy which was
required. Sir-R. Bethell explained at considerable length,
and with much exactness, the working of the new court
and office. With respect to wills of real estate, there
was at present this anomaly—that Whereas the probate of
a will was conclusive as to personal' estate, it did not
establish its validity as- to real estate. It was time,
he thought, that this anomaly should be put an end
to, and ho proposed "that any person 'interested in
rerl estate under a will should have the power of
bringing forward that will in tin court to have
it finally and conclusively established ; so that the effect
Would be competent to deal with all questions ielating to
the validity or invalidity of wills, both of seal and per-
Renal estate. He then proceeded to explain bis scheme for
the compensation of parties for the loss of offices under the
bill, observing that its effect would be to disarm Opposi-
tion to the-propoeed reform. The proctors, as a compen-
sation
-for the loss of their present monopoly, would have
secure&to them for life an annuity equal to one-half of
the income derived froni their professional practice. The
total amount-of charge for all these compensations would
be 144,1001. To meetthis prop.° 1 to-add to the fee fund
of the Testamentary Court, which would be• 74,7461., a
i 3f5106e6, which
nearly wouldls,
000 yield
1. more 83,
charge of 3 Ter cent. upon the stamp, in lieu of. the proc-
tors' sthl.'inmeta•idounlgd an
ne
aggregate
ofrequired.
With lespect to the advocates of Doctors'-commons they
eeiytotwfe tolt
thitlaitci
upon
talents
ttslh):.eruir runt rleesi
baaernedg:h.aet
id
In cnoennros.
etar ctdhins
byontnitbil would
tbehexa
cAllsmioirn.,lttybewSaosltiieni,tioerr. aatnettil
ttihmatt eb
iaCourtup upon
aconsideration,in t
the subject
cf marriage and divorce was prepared, and
would shortly be introduced • -
into that or the other House
of Parliament. The subject !of ehurch discipline, he was
understood to Rey, would likewise be considered.
Mr NAPIER
bill,
• , without opposing thointroduction of the,
adverted to the opinion expressed by the Lord Chan-
cellor last year, that the jurisdiction of' the Ecclesiastical
Courts should be dealt with, not piecemeal, but as a whole;
and he contended thatsit would be wiser and better, in-
at; of ft t,,_,,tlytnert.fury bill tocarry substantial'
, re-';
- , 1.7 i rrt i-f

evils of tc''"-
ttlentary jurisdiction had bee:i, he tbotght, greatly exag-
gerated, all, agreed that it diould be Te3ted in one Court,

-;",.llittc, three rn,
Nlarsellies 25 47)4
Bourdeaux • •••• •• ••
Frankfurt-an `.!aine••.. 119
Berlin •• •• .• •• .• ••
Vienna•••••••••••• •••• 12 30
Prieste •• ;•or •• •• •• •• 12 32
Petersburg •••••••.••.• 86
Madrid ••••••••••••••• 50
.. 50%
Barcelona ............-
5evi11e...............-

Nio Janeiro
Buenos Ayres.. •••• •• ••
New York,o days' eight
Philadelphia ••••• • •• •••
PRICES OF BULLION. PE
s
ot
Foreign Ga 0
l in Bars .£3 17 37,
Portugal Gold Coin .• 0 0 •••
0 0
Mexican Dollars ••
Surer in
in bare Dbollars 0
‘O, s

SEABORNE MAILS.

(N signifies that the mails are sent from the Goner—
.1 1144441"
y the night—and 31 by the morninr--despaC.)

''Y '..a.p.a.l.—••m• ma , •••.,.....,.. ..... ~ _
- ----.--.-----"---.---
, When
Day wiaen in a. t... •.• frond vrbit.
COUNTRIES. due l 0
in General Post- rat , Engiand.
Office, London.* Dispatched. ~.........._.......
America(byßrit.pack)N Every Friday .• . • Liverpool .
kmericP,tby United Sts. 7---
-----------
Each Von
, I
. LiverPooi Marelt 23
i ): ti
1;:t it
oaaet err:ka
11(
tlevilian:a (byl, (I.va Ir.: al
Is.: e:: ill 81. Statessu.)..t. hNI•I
• • • • " •• .. SoUthaMpto..,
Ditto (via Cape of cloed Uncertain
..../%7, ..... ••• • • • *" March 12
Africa (West Coast) .. N:i3d of the month.. Plynaouth • • ,
Alexandria.— „ „ „N!3, 9, 24, & 30 of zn. Dover ......1
Alexandria- „ „ 914th tt 2oth of mon. Soathatript..4,..7llarck 24
Bah amas ......: .. • . i,4 17th 0! .tb .... .......... t• SD' "iv' tt erfilll! dt ti 1".......
Belgium ..„,........N Daily- - • • .....• Dover •• ... • ~6.1".,'"'r 316
Brazil ~ „„„ „ ,„ 9th of the month.. Soath.uni.to.., I
ilnenosAyres-..., ~ ..M '9th of the month,. Southall' toi.lnioertaid
Cape of Good llOpe ..N Venus p0115,'
Cape of Good Elope ••=1
Jape de Verds ...... N 9th of the month puthan2o.s'' ..
7iey-lon (soe Inlia)
Jeylon..„ „ „ „ ....
„lc 71.. '
...4- ~ ' . ;7. „., _
.•
•....
~f a.Ti, pat
??._
ilamitam lAprg. • '
.)ban
Isles ........N Mit Will4P--Prtit.lL,q;.6.o,3,thaCappltotonn'l/
Thill.. _...... „„„ „ Ai 01- It* 4 ija6-fitt, aourthimPt)' march 20
Chine.... 'Ohee a.nionth.. • • ..?
ijonstantinoPle ~.. __: , '4,13, .8,Y35,i'.‘6.91M '374... ' frill
tiellStanthlOple ••, ~ , 4i..til S:: 20 flt.of Mon. Bouthara lcedail.9
Cont. of Europe 3i 8c N Twice daiik •••• • .. Devl.l" ••., 44' 'l'w.
EgYpt (aeo India) - .! n„ric.idelt
France - - - - M & N 'Twice daily.. •-• .. 'Boyer ••••-.•.1.100 90
libraltar .. -__, , b 4 14, 7, 17, 20, 27 oral. blouthhniPs7lll
Iseece (see India) ~ LAPril 1
ireytown ........, g 2r.d & 17th of mon. Southarapt•o, ,
darriburgh ..........N Tuesday & Friday London ..
t•o•;•,tiprii 1
.I.ivaimall _,,„ „ „ m 2nd of the mon!. - South3l'l,. ~ ip,lY
ionand ..•• .• ...... m Da1t1,,....•z••..::'..00ve7.r" April 1
flondora7 .... .•-_ m 17 ttt of-the InoutN. South aor
au"(viSouthamPt.) Ml 4 Or Fc -.20t1i of iiion.tryrilout
.• •
au" (ia Marseilles)Mi9Litts2sth of month Dover . ... ~.•
lonian fan
(ace India) 71111.0 27 of Mon Dover..
~• 7•
.!Twicedigilv
Ireland ........ni & N TO'A.(tlaily 1, ..4:11O1,31el ' 4,,,Afareh 95
Lison ,„ „„,, „. m 9; •17;& 21 of in. SoutltaniP, ,
vfadeira .......... .. 31 9th of ,the month Sguttounpt..:
~pril 16
dadeira ............N 23d of .month .... Liverpool
. .
+tails (see India) ~ March 90 .. :
delta ..,,,. NB, 18. &28 Of mon, Dover ,• ,•
•tauritins (see India) . April 1
vlaurithis ..........N 14th of the mouth .
_____._,,,
Mexico . .
aples ... ...... - 152trhvili°ftbt2115ethom°flltoP1-: 'D-S°UVt-en:7l:7: • 1
low Granada ......M 2d eiL 17th of montlt
tievr Zealand i; over ••• • • •
Papal States ........ N,ithlrtth2ht tosoo :
.tionthamptan
Peninsulaucai .. .... .... ......... MN
sitthhiis7tll:22s7:l:o-nuomnt_
Peru „„,„.. „, ~ ~94 .d 8e 27th of in
....,,ariows
ports -n
' v carte
By priva tot skip
Port Natal •••••.......N By prtivate ship. •, Y
;I, Dover •••• ..•
'-S°‘7EllrtiOhllaSinpP'../Wl:l,l.7nCertil .
SICITY '•• •• ••••,,,,,,...N sth to h25tiftw0i1:00n.,.....0, ..... . 1
icneamela „., , „.„ ~,m 2d& Dui o 11() tilibOUl
Van Diemen's.L.tutO (sec
A.ustralia) ...... •• •• . AI 1
-at pi i- i 7th o , month Southampton Ap..-
west Indies .• ••••• • `" i '''
.
~,.., ,nails. ortil_g tie;

When any a these datea fall ol a +lmlay, , the wails wlll ne de-
spatched on the following day, with the exception of the India via
South= tn
Pn), and the Diana, both of which Will be despatahod the
receding day.

87.1111115.
07 A sort.
On the 30th inst., at St. -Pads-road, tile wife of Arthur
H. Browning, Esq.

On tho 28th , Or A DAUGIITEIit.
ham. inst., in Arlington-street, Lady Viralsing-

rz 1.BRI.E1).
limns, I'llll2
On the 29th inst at Old Milton Church, next GraOlt
ughter of tho l t Mr. E Blow of Gillinghaw.
end,,a Kent, Captain 'Masters, R.M.. to Isabella, the third
Adm
On the e• E. Bane•.'
Joh 29th inst., at St• Thomas s Church, Ity:de,
ra lint Hill, Bombay Engineers, son of the late
to Mary Vizabeth, daughter of
"218, G.C.B ,of Burwood House, urrey.
and grandniece of the late AdtniraillTrsThos.

lethe 22d inst ,
--------
D I g D. /Wade, liar-
On
George Jeffs, Esq.,
yford-road, Kennington, aged n.
0 e ITIS ey, •
n the 27th inst -tilli Yorkshire,
W. Sa- dW•tl " a
il. C..-8., of the 13.nnba.v ArinYL!.,,. of Bdraon-
On the 9th iest , Edward John .Field, .r, q ' .
ton,
Middlesex, aged 76. Piekirr
On the 29th inst., ' Surrey, John
atNorwood' , CO'
son E-
, sq., late Com troll G eral of her goieitY 8
P er- en
toms, aged 67. tieut.-Gen.
On the 23th ' st
tain Lidtl'ard in.
.
of
the 66th Regt., aged 70. dd.son
On thel2B4- ' ,at 11, Trafalgar-square,
.h inst. Mr• 11. • G 'llim of A
, . • Any wi
north IC • •
, °Mang-hill, formerly of tho Strand, ogeu
_-----"--'-----
---
--- -
.1°75-T-'oll° D--Inte,i and Pab'lsb,l by AITTRDO 8'.°175.??
~" :.:7\- ''' ran,i, 21.;10.:-r, r'l4- 7''''' ' ''' 0610, go. ll= ,
,-,cri,,L, moll a
I, in tne PrecinQ, of tilt, i,:tvo , in the °—
Chelsea, Cap-
Mitidlesta, aturday, March 31. 1.65

1e-