The Express.
London, England, 1861-07-09 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, TUESDAY EVENING, JULY 9, 1861.

HOMES If itUrK OUT OF THEIR ENGAGEMENTS.
Jame V.—Aft< r 4 pm : Knight of St. Michael, out of
dos July asi ChPstrrfield Stake*.
Ana 9l—At . p.m.: Black Diamond, out of all engage-
weft

Ady 1. —At 9 a.m. : All Black, North Weld, Oipsy
mid lepidist, nut of Carlisle engagements ; Malek,
est of the July cod Chesterfield Stakes; Hurricane, out of
the July Stakes ; Ranee f and Robin Hood, ont of the
Stamford Plate ; Conecript, oat of engagements up to
July Jl Garrisoli Beauty, out of the Cumberlaod Plate.
At 10 p.m. Cowman, out of the July stakes; Hopeful
Lambe..., out of the Chesterfield :Makes. At 3.3, p.m. :
liens-rat fleas aod !Gnat-Arms, out of Worcester engage-
MClita. Al p.m.: Zodiac, out of the Worcestershire
Drakes, the Nottingham' Handicap, and the Burghley
Handicap at Stairdon
July 2. —At tta.m. : Sunflower, out of Worcester en•
~agswsuls Co,mit Bob,, out of Worcestershire Stakes ;
of Worceder engagements. After 0.0 p.m.:
Amsterdam, out of the Stamford Plate.

July 4. —At.: JU p.nu ; Walkingtoo, out of the Liverpool
Cup.

carers,.

ENGLAND r. FIFTEEN OP KENT.
This match was commenced at Lord's yesterday,
whoa tbotolloviog play took place :

T 4:weiCitia.-7;--"and b

Jati;;*
I I.) tykon, ark 122ackass I
G. Mansell.
L 1611126er, brIZZo•
W. P. Train. Lq., at Lock•
yer, b PONT
W Gsalbsw, b Jackson
W. Y. Taunus, Sm., 0 Callya I
W estrys H. Pryer. c Carpenter.
•J
A. repW. Fat., L Parr 14

W. M. ".S;ie•Fon,— Y.;l7.7Parr,
b Catryii
W. Hopkinson. b Grundy
Capt. Dunne. e btepbeisstn
Hs) ant
G. M. Belson. Pte., rod out lii
Z. G. Armstrong. run out
G. Baker. b Stephenson
b 4,14 i s, n. 13 2

Total

7tuT I:
R. Daft. I, Rennet
J. Grundy. not or,t
It Carpenter. not out
T. Hayward

woos.
O. 0,1110
C loompos

O. Parr

Said li

H. H. Stepbeabm

NAVAL AND MILITARY.

Anx IRALT v. Jt cv 8. APPorxrts ENT's. —Lieu-
tenants J. W. Lambe, to the Wanderer, and G. 8. Graves,
to the Orion.

Midshipmen G. W. Osmond, to the Doris, and G. V.
Story, to the Carnelian.

PORTSMOUTH, JULY 8.
The Persian, 12, sailing sloop, Commander Cucil
W. Beckley, V. C., arrived at Spithead this afternoon from
of the Cape Oravt Hope, and sedated the Slag of the naval
Ossamendse-uCbiet at this port, Sir Hear! W. Bruce. She
writ sail to the eastward, where ahe will pay olf.

MALTA, JCLT 4.
The Court of Inquiry connected with the Artil-
hry, seer sittiez nice dip, stopped. As it is a watt el
inquiry Us proeeedieis are secret, so no one lawn the
meett.

_
Heir Majest shipasb!foliazkbeenr!Zissv:lrabooehstare 'mimed
rhipeEtrise Walter ;in thee moint'ene bee Jite.
/may 's slap Assurance left with the mails for itkefn yaks,
day. Os the 2ud, her Majesty's ship Neptune, trial Ad.
mind Martin's dag, and 1...md0n, momeded to elm for a
cruse mend Sicily. lt reported the Admiral will be eh-
smatabout a fortnight.
Hs Majesty's ship Greyhound proceeds to 3fessioa with
the mails on Monday next.

Rain Intelligence.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.-JrLY 8.

Sittings at Nid Przaa m London—(Bolars Lord Chief
Junkies Erb and a Special Jury.)

11.1:N9: LL r. BIIID-MIL TUILVDCLL £lO THI PROTTATSIIT

ALLIANCE.
(Continued from yesterday's Express.)
Mr. Tnrobull ernes-examined—Mr. Hardy, when the
attacks were made in September, 18.1.9, told the Master of
the Rolls that I would resign ; but his Honour said,
" Never. I will not ignore my own appointment." When
I saw the Master of the Rolls in July, 1860, I did not offer
to resign, because I was fortified with his opinion of me,
and by my consciousness of my own integrity. My case
was brought before parliament by Mr. Maguire, who sent
for me. -1 beard his speech, which I think correctly stated
the facts. If my competency alone bad been attacked I
would not have resigned, but when a felonious act of the
basest kind was imputed to me I was compelled to appeal
to the public for redress, and I could only do so by romps.
ing. lam fully aware that the deputation requested my
removal to some other position, in which my religions views
would not interfere with my duties. I have not, to my
knowledge, ever seen Mr. Bird until to-day. Some pro-
testant gentlemen got up • memorial which was counter to
the one laid before Lord Palmerston, and for this I thank
them. One of thedocuments calendared by me is the answer
of King Edward I. to an invitation to loin the protestant
princes, but Ido not col:inkier this a religious document. It
is an important historical document. There are in the list
roost interesting documents affecting the progress of the
Reformation on the Continent, and most material to those
who wish to write upon the history of the times. There are
not many important documents in the reign of Edward VI.
relating to religion ; there is plenty of abuse of the Roman
catholic*. The Jesuits have been banished from every
country in Europe. and were not relieved by the EDlSOCl-
pation Act ; but they are still here, and openly confess
themselves Jesuits. I believe they have a provincial
in this country. I should expect that there are documents
there referring to the Dragonnades of Louis XIV. and the
Massacre of St. Bartholomew, and possibly in reference to
the operations of Jesuits in this country. There may be
documents in reference to the Gunpowder Plot.
Mr. &will, in the course of some discussion, admitted
that the volume of the Calendar published by Mr. Turnbull
was • fair and important work, and that he was fully com-
petent to the office he had bold.
Be-examined I received for my Weary labour as mien-
darer during the eighteen meths about 2181., after deduct-
ing income tax. (Laughter.) I had spent about 4001. io
purchasing • library, because I thought the appointment
would be permanent. When I published the 'Agendas
Catholicw it was to ridicule some of my brother barristers
who adopted inconsistencies in reference to religious mat-
ters; for instance, one esteemed friend would not snuff
during Lent, because he considered snuffing a luxury, but
at the same time be indulged very heartily in a cigar.
Mr. Bovill referred at some length to the speech of Lord
Palmerston, in the Home of Commons, upon Mr. Maguires
motion.

Mr. Kerslake, however, objected that Lord Palmerston
himself should be called.

Mr. Barill maid his lonlabip had beet subpoenaed to attend
when it waa thought this CYO was coming on on a former
occasion, but today his lordship's secretary only was in
attendance.

Mr. Hardy, the assistant keeper of public records, said—l
represented to the Muter of the Rolls that Mr. Turnbull
was well qualified for the case of calendarer of state papers.
Everybody has access to the records, fore' as well as
Englishmen, and lam sot aware of • ' instance where
a document has been tampered with. r. Turnbull was
not subjected to any restriction which did not apply to
everybody etre. The regnlstior na in the office are such,
that if an document were tampered with it would be dis-
covered almost instantly. Noes after I became aware of
the controversy which arose about Mr. Turnbull, the Master
of the Rolls desired me to see if there were any papers
which Mr. Turnbull had to caleuder which were of a
controversial tendency, sad I did so. I am not aware
that Mr. Turnbull had to Wender any document of im-
portance with refereace to the Reformation. I found no
document which I ',moldered of a controversial character.
I have examined every paper calendared by Mr. Turnbull,
sad I can say that his duty has been done faithfully, ably,
sad in a echolarlike manner. No parson on the part of the
Protestant Alliance has been to the Record-office to see how
Mr. Turnbull has done his work.

The Rev. J. 8. Brewer—l have been engaged some years
in calendering the state papers of the reign of Henry VIII.
The papers upon which the plaintiff was engaged went
mainly of a political character, and I do not know of any of
them which related to the history of religion of that period.
I examined the plaintiff's Calendar and found it fully,
honestly, and efficiently done.
This concluded the plaintiffs case, and the further hear-
ing was adjourned.

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.
JULY 8.
(Before the Judge Ordinary.)
RADIFORD Y. RADIOILU.7• EIr9BLND.

Thin was petition of a 110;b7nd for • judicial separa-
tion on the ground of cruelty. The wife denied the charge,
alleged condonation and also recriminated with pleas of
cruelty.
Mr. Hawkins, Q.C., Dr. Tristram, and Mr. Inderwick
appeared for the petitioner; Mr. Serjeaut Shee and Dr.
Steaks for the respondent.
The petitioner, Mr. Francis Radford, of No. 3, Camden-
hill Villas, Nottiog-bill, a mild-spoken and inoffensive-
looking man of about 40 years of ate, said—l married the
respondent at St. Nacres Murcia on the 2tith of August,
1845. Her name was Sarah Barden. Her mother was •
laundress, and she was herself in swim 1 was working as
a journeyman builder for my father. For three years altar
the marriage we lived in lodgiap in Camden-town ; but in
1848 we went to reside in the neighbourhood of Bayswater.
I started in busineas for myself, and for about seven years
have bees in partnership with my brother William. We have
lately been engaged on some rather extensive works
at Notting-bill. The conduct of my wife has been
extremely bad ever dace the int three weeks of our married
life. Bhe habitually used violent and abusive language.
81iii beet, scratched, and bit me ; she spat in my face, and
pulled my hair. On the 25th of July, 1454, she locked me
up is my bedroom all night witbout any moss whatever.
(LituOter.) On the 29th of the same mouth she pursued
the mine conduct. She called me all aorta of names, and
hit roe • violent blow with her tilt. I made notes of liar
behaviour at the time ; but she has purloined some of my
manuscrints.
orilTristram—dyad your note of the 25th of August, 1854.
'MUM began to do so.
Mr. Serfeent Shea —la that the very memorandum you
made at the time

touters—No. It is a copy which I made from my
I ontoairirrr Serjeast Shai—Thee you must not look at that. You
mod mad from the original 'melt.
Witness—Very well; but I cannot do it very rapidly, for
it is written in a mast head, to keep it from my wife.
flasghter.) The entry is—" August 25. 11.. anniversary
of my marriage. Abused me an day. Breakfast slew
dinner alone also. When she came into the roost where
1 wee at dinner she directly aimed a violent blow at my
heed. I should observe that I have slept by myself during
the last two nights. She annoyed me in every possible
way." (The witness made no further use of his diary.) Ou
the 6th of January, 1/16.5, she accusal me of steeling some-
thing or ether, end I told her she sfoght to be careful Low
she made such charges ; and then I mentioned some honey
which she had aceused a relative of mine of purloining. She
flew into • violent pennon, std I refused to sup with her
that evening. saying that I would Lave supper by
myself when she had done; bat whoa she had finished she
put out the gas, and followed me shoat shaming me in every
poodlgo way. I hid myself, and then tome down for the
of getting my supper. 12 about twenty minutes or
rani hour she rushed down stake in her night clothes,
violently assaulted me, beat and scratched me, and pulled
my hair. At last I put out the light is self-defence, and
in order to get rid of her. Then I went into the
kitchen and finished my supper. She assaulted me mein
when I was in bed. She thumped me with her fist.
end kicked me. She grinned at me (Ls ughter)—and pulled off
the bed clothes. In January, 185:4 I wrote sad proposed a
separation, but she sent mossavis to me begging me to
forgive her. On Ist of February, 1856, when I went up to
my rows, she jumped out of 'bed, pulled me by my hair,
and add she would go to Home-cottage, Notting-hill,
where ea brother lives (and where, I suppose, she thought
I bad Imes), aid would pull down ever" door nod window
is the place. She said "'Mere were already thieves
and
a murderer"—meaning, a. I understood her, that she
would murder me. She added that she would not put up
with such a -- scoundrel any lager. On the 14th of
August, 1859, I west home at about ten o'clock. She
looked at me, end said, " I em going to do it calmly now."
(Laughter.) Then she became very abusive. 1 toll her to
leave the room. She refused ; and, putting my hand upon
her shoulder, I said " You most go out, if you please."
She went out more quietly then I expected, but the
next moment she came in by another door,
and pulled me violently by the hair, sagging sue
at the some time. She made such a disturbance that the
servant, who had gone to bed, got up and came down to
us. Ido not remember if I slept with the respondent th.t
night, but the next morning I felt very ill ; and when I
combed my head! found a large handful of loose hair come
out. (Witness detailed many other acts of vi. donee.) At
length, on the 7th of April, 18C0. I ordered her out of
the house, m son being then very ill. She refused
to go till the 1 y oth of Jose, but I never slept with her
in the iaterral. I did not give her a black eye on the 4th of
March, 182)0, or strike her with my fist ou the nose In Marsh,
1851, or on the 10th of February, 1856, or in July. 12165.
I did not knock her down on the lath of January, 1867, or
strike her with a broom on the 11th of April. I have boa
sae, the eldest being fourteen or fifteen years of age. She
bass committed acts of the kind I hove described in their pro-
saic*. In October, 1810, I was laid up for three weeks
with congestion of the brain, in coosequenos of the continued
brutal treatment I had remised from her.

The wiles= was emes.ezammed at great Iregth by Mr.
Sedeant Mao upon particulars which do not admit (4 being
reported. He denied that he had ever struck her or
thrsalsoed to strike her, but admitted that when she had
spat at him he might possibly have returned the emnpli-
meet. is order that abs might learn what a disagreeable and
beastly trick it was. Had called her a "strumpet' three

or four times, but had apologised for the phrase,
and explained that be had not used it in the
Joboaooian sense of the term, but merely implying
that she was sluttish in her habits. She
was a bastard, but witness had never reproached her with
it. Had, in fact, known of it before the marriage. Had
never imputed wichastity to her. Had often bees apm-
beasive of what she might do, for her conduct was like
that of a m►d woman. Might have called her a beast, but
it was only after she bad used certain expressions. After
she had left she asked witness to let her come back. Told
her that that would depend upon her conduct. Never
told her that he hoped to see her die like a dog in a ditch.
When witness was first taken ill she said, " You villain,
you are pretending ;" but when she found the indispositon
was serious, she showed good feeling, and was attentive to
witness.

Mrs. Eliza Paxon, an acquaintance of the family, said
the petitioner was very kind to his wife. He was too kind
—in fact quite simple. (A laugh.) lieroonduet wee that
of • fury on all occasions to her husband, and also to wit-
ness. (Laughter.) Was once at hton with her. Mr.
Pazon came down, and it was agreed that they should go to
Shoreham in a fly. Mrs. Radford complained %bat the driver
was not the are she was accustomed to have. Her husband
said, " What does it matter if he is a careful man?' She
immediately flew at him, and assaulted him. She continued
her worrying conversation, and kept " nagging " at him
all the day. The result was that he refused to stop at
Brighton, and they both went home to Bayswater. Had not
spoken to her since. Was once telling her what confidence
witness had in her own husband, and she said, "I, too,
have a good and kind husband."
In confirmation of the petitioner's case, two yottno ladies,
who had been governesses in the family, and a considerable
number of the servants, were also called. One of them
described her master's conduct as having always been
" respectful, calm, gentlemanly, to his wife and to his
servants."

Mr. Serjeant Shoe having addressed the jury, celled
the respondent,
Mrs. Sarah Radford, who said—l have bad various quar-
rels with my husband. On the 15th of March, 1858, my
husband made observations respecting my birth, which an-
noyed me a good deal. Re frequently called mea bastard.
He began when I had my business in Coll met, Cam-
den-town, about six months after I was married. I threw a
duster at him, but I don't think it touched
him. He went out for • walk. At night I
his pardon, and I thought all was forgiven. On the
d following Wednesday I said to him at dinner, ' Frank, will
you give me some fttoesr. He said, "You beast, get
them yourself." Asriuds I asked him to give me some
bread end cheese. He called me • strumpet, and I threw
the bread and Amen over his head. I begged his pardon
for that too. One evening thinking that my husband had
gone out for the night with • supposed cousin of mine
named William Burden, who was in his service, I went
down in my night-clothes to put out the gu. They were
a the house, and my husband said to me, " You lewd
woman, go up stairs. I went to bolt the street-door, and
he cam put his arm round me, and hurt me very much.
He had bees • wrestler in Devonshire, and always served
me so when he beat me. Then I called him a villain and
• scoundrel. I was then eight months with child. I
was took weak to assault him. On another occasion, having
had an altercation with him about some money, he threw
some sugar in my eyes, which made them smart. I then
pulled his hair, and he attacked me with • long broom. I
wrestled with him for it, and I think I obtained poeseesion
of it. On the 14th of August I asked him to take me out
for a walk. He said he would, and I went to put my
things on. When 1 came beck he said he had oaly promised
to take me to "get my fine monkey up. " I was very
vexed, and took him by the oat, but did not shake
him. On the 7th of February, 1880, I was in the
act of putting some coals on the fire. My husband
came in and accused me of hiding his gloves.
I stated l had not done so. He mid, " You strumpet, You
have;" and I replied, " Coafound you, if you all me that
again ni throw the shovel at you ;" but I did not. On
another occasion he was aggravating me by turning the gas
jets out as fast as I lit them ; and I said that if he did go
I would throw the Inciters at him : but I did not. I cannot
remember whether I struck him. I once bit him, bat it was
because he had a way of putting his knuckles in my throat.
Sometimes be would throw use like • wrestler. Forty a
the years 1854 my husband's mother came to aie
my boy who was afflicted, and she said, "
why don't you put him in the hospital'' I was very
much enraged to think that it should be proposed to me to
send my boy to • p üblie institution. I recollect locking
my husband out that night. He had said to me, " Lady
Duchess, if you don't look out, I will bring a cab and take
that boy away." The threat worked on my feelings, for I
was nervous and in bad health, and I was really-afraid he
was going to take my child from me ; when, therefore, I
beard him return I locked the door, but I afterwards felt
that I had done wrong, and sent the governess to find him
and ask bins to return. In January, 1855, he had made an
insulting remark to me, and I pulled his hair. I cannot
scratch, having, from my childhood, had abed habitat biting
my nails. (Laughter.) On 27th of lan., 1856, I bad • quarrel
with him about a servant who had neglected her work. He
interfesed, and I said, " I don't cans to your buildings and
meddle with your men, why do you meddle with my
maid ?" He said, "She is worthy to take your
That very much irritated me, but I don't know whether I
did anything to him. He often celled me " the duchess,"
and said that Notting-hill would soon be too small for me.
He used to find fault with me for my walk and my
behaviour out of doors. He often spat at me ; and
once, I regret to say, I did so at him. Ow
morning be applied an offensive epithet to me,
and I jumped out of bed and shook him. He
struck me for that on the nose. He has bad three
attacks of congestion of the brain. Before the last he had
been applying himself very closely to business. He has
conunitted many violent assaults upon a In March, 1860,
he gave me • black eye because I tried to prevent the lam
ore house in College-street from going to Mr. John Redford.
In March, 19541, he gave me another—l forget why. He
struck me with part of • bedstead while we were moving
into our house at Camden-hilL-2111es. I remember the
evening he had been at Howe Cottage. When he came
back he had been drinking and smoking. I was impatient
with him, and he rushed at me and arc lted me. The
neighbours beariug the noise came into the house and stayed
with me. two hours. One manna be 'track me in bed. I had
some papers, on which ballad written, "cold mutton chop,
off cold plate," and such things asthat. I said to him,
" You call yourself a man to writedown • woman's failings, '
and I with a family, too." Once he pushed me down, and
by the fall caused me • miscarriage. In July, 1868,
I told him that Dr. Smith said I must go
out al town, and I asked him for some money.
He said, " Now I'll do for you," and he treated me with
great violence. It made me verylll, and I wee sever well
after. On the 7th al April, MO, I asked Idea for some
mosey. He called me • brats and I regret to say I retali-
ated, for I said, " You villain, do you dare to call me a
beast before my child?" Then I said, "Look what
von have done to my boy—he will be • klein-
laut cripple as long as be lives through your
sending bins to that abominable school in Frame." After
that afternoon he said, " I have not done with you yet.
I would be • friend to you • but you shall find me the
bitterest enemy you ever bad." The same evening he
Musa his hand into my mouth as far as ms tonsils. Then
be shook me as one dog shakes another. Then he dragged
me out of the room. I never struck him on that occasion,
but my little to did. I had slept with him on the 6th.
During the rest of the time I stayed at the house he used
such tyranny to me that I beanie a mere wreck, an
that I could not lift • cup up to my mouth.
Cross-examined—He offered me an allowance, but I
would never consent to it. No third person was ever pre-
sent at these quarrel/. Have had 50 servants, not 150. (A
portion of this witness s evidence was also unfit for publi-
cation.)
No witnesses were called to corroborate her story.
Mr. Serjeaut *lee and Mr. Indorwick having addressed
the jury,
Sir C. Cromwell summed up. It was' not often that a
man condeicended to ask the protection of the court against
hie wife. but be generally took the matter into his own
hands. The petitioner' whatever his conduct at home might
have been, had in the box been all meaner and humility ;
but it was also right to observe that the respondent had in
court been calmness itself.

-171;e7;ry-, wriiout.l7a. tits box. foun that both par-
ties had been guilty of ty to oath other, and that both
had condoned each other's offense.

This was the last jury ewe that will be tried before the
long vacation.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.—Jusy &
(Before Mr. Casuoiriceer Holroyd.)
IN RE D. M. AND G. $. /Truce.

The bankrupts were merchante of n
we.; the examination sitting,' but the In
not been filed.

This
Lave

ifr:fawranee appeared for the assignees ; sad Mr. Link-
later for the baukrupta.
An adjooroment for six weeks wee agreed to.
Maws. Hart's preliminary siatenisut of accounts shows
unsecured debts of 1,19:11. ; ILblliths, 5,408 f. ; assets, 770 f.
Further debts of 18,8001. are mooned by property valued st
14,0001.

would have got their composition, and the debtors
would have got their release. The arrangement ought to
have been carried out under the direction of the official as-
•signs, and not left to the creditor, themselves. The bank-
rupts had acted very imprudently in reviving their obliga-
tions ; but the blame ought not to rest on the bankrupts
alone, it should be shared by the creditors who had this
sought to obtain more than the rest. Therefore the oertifi-
sates would not be suspended on that ground. As there was
nothing of unavoidable loss or misfortune in the case, the
certificates would only be granted as of the third clam

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT.

VEER' ERDAL

Ernest Brown, 48, who pleaded guilty last session to a
employees,a 17: sum. ofi /I.°74'istrtrygtoy of his
it will
De remembered, absconded from in IL.
cennYt.cv to Port Natal,
from which place he was brought back to England by the
detective police, was placed at the bar to receive judgment.
Mr. Tindal Atkinson, who appeared far the prosecution,
stated to the court that the prisoner was employed in a
confidential capacity by the prosecutors, and bad taken ad.
vantage of his paallion to plunder them of large sums of
money, the total amount of his defalcations being 10,0001.
It was supposed that be would have given some account of
a suni of 1,2004, which it was believed was still under his
tiontrel, and judgment was reunited to the present emirs
to afford him an opportunity for doing so. The prisoesr
bad not, however, during the interval thought proper to
give his employers any information, and be was, therefore,
merely instructed to leave tho matter in the hinds of the
court._ . . . . .

Mr. Cooper, who appeared for the primer, stated that he
was instructed to inform the court that la.fe/ ray ego
the prisoner bad uolisppily entered into ant
speculations, which had resulted in very great losses ;
la an evil hour, he misappropriated awns of this
motley to cover these losses, in the hope that he be
able to restore it. His losses, however, continued to in-
crease, and at length he found it impossible to remain
any longer in this country, and he proceeded to Port
Natal, where be hoped to retrieve his position ; but be
was instructed to stele positively that, so far from the pri-
soner having taken a large sum of money away with him,
lie proceeded to the colony as a third-class passenger, and
be bad only 101. in his possession over and above his pas-
money.
The Recorder, in passing sentence, said that the prisoner
bad been employed in a position of confidence, and while
in that position he had robbed his employers of a very large
sum of money. Nothing but a very severe sentence would
be calculated to deter others from the commission of a
similar crime, and he felt it his duty to order the prisoner
to be kept in peed servitude for the space of ten years.
Mr. Atldneas said that the prosecutors bad been put to
emskienible exposes in bringing the prisoner back to this
country, and he applied to the court to make an order that
this mosey should be allowed in the expenses.
The Rewriter said that the court would render all the
essistanc• is its power to enable the prosecutors to be reim-
bursed the necessary expense that bad been incurred in the
prisoner's apprehension.