The Express.
London, England, 1861-04-23 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, TUESDAY EVENING, APRIL 23. 1861.

The SPEAKER eras anderstood t asiv that the hoe.
where beet plan mould be to almodeni the present bill
and to twin.; in a new oue, frdned iu accordance with the
amendment which bed heen carried

INDIAN ARMY AMALGAMATION.
Mr. BENTINCK asked the !kcretury of State for hullo
whether he had may objection to lay bef:.re the bowie copies
of the orders or communications Neut or mado by him to
the I ..vernor.Grieeral for carrying out the amalgamation of
the aoyal .ord local snub anti for giving effect to her Ma-
jolty s warrant for the formation of a Staff Corps for India,
ilated .I.n. le., 1861, together with copior. of all ailments end
aptaious reonded on that measure by member' of the Council
of Italia in January,
Sir C. WOOD said that In the imaructions which hod
been sent out to the Governor-General of hails permission
hal lava given to mike such :iterations as might be
ilerrne,hle,..imhle. As vet government had not received any
iatinuU•rn respecting whatever alterations might have been
made, When they bad there would be no objection to laying
them on the tablet

of Exchequer bonds ; but where was the money to do so
Not one of those projects was carried out. Did he blame
ministers for not adhering to those resolutions' No; be-
cause his impression was that the great thing was to keep
faith with the public creditor with the least pressure on the
resources of the country ; and se long as they did that,
they might dispense with resolutions (Hear, heard With
regard to this 'articular tax, Imause circumstances were
changed their duty was not changed, which was to consider
what was most for the wants of the
_people. (Hear, beard
Now, as to this particular tax be would not vote for its
repeal • he did not consider the house was bound to vote for
the repeal of this tax. If it saw that it was advisable to dis-
pense with that income, or if it saw that it had • surplus,
would it not be wiser to apply that surplus for the reduc-
tion of duties upon articles of consumption of the people
He should like to have seen the remissions confined to only
one-half what had been proposed ; but he had been told
he was not in the position of the Chancellor of the Exche-
la:Lc:wort; that tee hasp not hris
tkotirtibedege otfrexpeLilnee...Th. e
with 2,000,00 W., but let them see horns he could
employ'w
those 2,001.4000 f. If that be so, let the Chancellor of the
Exchequer apply that sum to reduce the taxation on articles
of consumption used by the people. (Hear, hear.) With
regard to the income tax, they underrated the pressure
upon those who were consumers ; and he thought that
that was to be the only source or great source of
patchingeeo up the revenue in time of peace, it might
a very dangerous expedient from the extent
to which it might be used in time of war. He
confessed that if he were to say how the surplus
might he applied it would be by a reduction on the tea
duty. (Hear.) He confessed that the course proposed by
the government to take off at once the paper duty was
neither wise nor safe, and he begged the ministers to re-
censider it. He begged her Majesty's ministers to believe
that he did BO not from any wish to disturb them from the
position where they now sat, for he looked upon no calamity
m great se • weak government, and no government could
be strong in that house unless it possessed a strong financial
position. (Hear.) He trusted they would value more
their responsibility in being provided against every danger
rather than be actuated by jealousy of what might take place
elsewhere—that at least was not the feeling which should
influence the House of Commons in its decision. (Cheers.)
Mr. WHITE observed that, although there had been •
reduction in the duty on tea within the last few years
to the extent of 35 per cent. it only diminished
the cost to the consumer 17 per cent But
owing to the disturbed state of China it actually came
to the, that after • diminution of duty in this country
there had been an increased augmentation of duty in that
country, consequently until there should be a more exten-
ded trade with China it would be hopeless to expect that
any remission of duty by the Chancellor of the Exchequer
would lead to cheapness, or to a lowering of the price of
tea. He spoke from • practical and extended knowledge of
the subject, and such were his °occlusions. (Hear, hear.)
Lord R. MONTAGU, in the existing state of me finances,
and of European and American polities, doubted the safety
of abandoning the paper duty.
Mr. BAXTER, in reply to Mr. Baring, defended the
budget, which, he mainta,ned, warn lased upon moderate
and reasonable calculations ; indeed, competent persons, he
said, were of opinion that the Chancellor of the Exchequer
had under-estimated the revenue for 1861-02. He thought,

however, that the expenditure ought to be greatly, though
gradually diminished.
Mr. fit'A NHOPE said he opposed that part of the budget
which remitted taxation, because he did not not see that
the Chancellor of the Exchequer had any surplus at all, a
real aurplue being the balance between the expenditure and
the revenue derived from taxation already existing.
Mr. DOLIBOSI said he saw no reason why he should dis-
trust the calsalatioas of the Chancellor of the Exchequer
for the current year, those of last year having turned out
remarkably correct. Mr. Baring had suggested that the
receipt of the 750,0001. from China was uncertain, but he
(Mr. Daiwa) thought it was as safe a portion of the revenue
as any. With respect to the disposal of the sv-plus, he
WWI not inclined to quarrel with the repeal of the paper
duty, which would be a great benefit, but the question wee
cue for consideration in the committee.

Kr. BLACKBURN examhad some of the calculations
von which the budget rested, end urged the expediency
el having a surplus actually in existence before taxes were
eel
supported the proposition
for the repeal of the paper duty, which would, be said, be •
great boon to Ireland.
Mr. BAILLIE contended that dependence could not be
placed upon the surplus of 1,900,00/. claimed by the
Chancellor of the Exchequer, which was made out, he said,
by • proem analogous to the raising of money to pay off
debts. He objected to the repeal of the paper duty, which
would not benefit the community. which the great body of
manufacturers did not want, and which would be an advan-
tage only to one small but powerful clam—the proprietors
of the penny newspapers.
Mr. W. EWA RT approved the repeal of the paper duty,
observ'm that when excise duties were taken off the aggre-
gate amount of that branch of the revenue increased. He
insisted that it would be a commend:it benefit and • litenuy
benefit, and that it would heal the dissensions between the
two Houses of Parliament. The budget was, in b.' opinion,
a wise and sensible one. _ _

that the available surplus of
the Chancellor of the Exchequer was Imaginary ' • that there
was in truth a deficiency of revenue. He bhunod the go-
vernment for relinquishing the paper duty, and give an
seaming history of the manufacture in Ireland. The my of
"taxes upon knowledge" he denounced as cant, substituted
for argument. The budget wee, in his view, objectionable
in temper and in its details, and it was likely to prove de-
lire.
r. NORRIS denied that the paper-makers were in-
different to the repeal of the excise duty on their manu-
facture, and he explained their feelings upon the subject.
Ur. B. LONG said he was =prised, and regretted that
the speech of Mr. Baring wee not followed by a more active
coselnaioa, and that he had not moved an amendment in
opposition to the resolution of the Chancellor of the Ex-
chequer. He condemned the nehmen of the government ;
he considered the repud of the paper duty most undesira-
ble and most unwise.

Mr. BLACK, in supporting the repeal of the paper
duty; showed how the duty operated injuriously, and the
great relief its remission would afford. The public paid
probably 2,000,001.2. for the 1;200,1..)1. received by the
exchequer.
Mr. WARNER likewise supported the repeal of the
duty.
Mr. BENTINCK made a ramming commentary upon the !
financial speech of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whom
he accused of carrying the principles of free trade to an
extravagant length. He denied that there was any surplus,
but if it was real it would not be possible for the Chas. I
caller of the Exchequer in another year to fall hack upon
any resource but • large Increase of the income tax.
Sir J. PAXTON insisted that the repeal of the paper
duty would be • very great boon to the consumers of paper,
though he admitted that he believed the paper-makers, as
• whole, were against the repeal because it world interfere
asith their monopoly.
Sir & NORTIICOTE said that the budget of his right
boo. friend might be viewed from many sides, It had •
political and a finaaeial side, and with the last alone be
should venture to deal. It was with great diffidence that
he rose to impugn the maculation' of so high an authority
as a cabinet minister ; but he was somewhat encouraged to
do so by the fact that the calculationsof his right hon. friend
last year had not been realised. His right boo. friend the
member for Huntingdon (General Peel) called in question
during the last session the sufficieney of the army estimates,
but the noble lord the Secretary for War (Lord Harbert)
expressed his conviction that the estimates of the govern-
ment would be sufficient, But it turned out that his right
hon. frieod was right to the extent of 450,0001. and the
Secretary of State was wrong. (Hear, hear.) No lees than
250,0001., which had been allotted to the navy, was inns-
tarred to the army ; and they heard, on Monday last, that
another sum of M,OOOl. was to be taken for the army
excels of the year. (Hear, hear.) Again, his right hon.
friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in his supple-
mentary budget of last July, told them that he was going
to take out a certain sum from the balances of the Ex-
chequer—he believed 1,286,0001. ; he told them that the
balances were in a satisfactory state—that they amounted to
a certain SUM in March—that they bad fallen in June—that
they amounted to 6,500,0031. ; but that it was expected
they would be In a more satisfactory state in September
than they were in June. It turned out however that they
were much less satisfactory, for they were lower in Sep-
timber than they were is June. (Hear.) He thought
these facts justified him in challenging the athroletions now
before them. He was astonished to hear it said that the
Predictions or rather the calculations made on his side of
the home had proved to be groundless, the fact being that
those calculations were literally justified by the result.
They stated last rear that the provision made for the year
was not sufficient. It was not sufficient. (Hear, hear.)
His right lion friend sail he had • surplus of 1,200,000/.,
but in truth if the houao declined to vote the taxes which
his right boo. friend nakal them to vote there would be a
defiriency of 8,500,000/. The CHANCELLOR of the EICHE.
urxii-20,000.000/.) If they declined to renew the tea and
sugar duties the deficiency would be 20,000,000 f.
but he referred only to them extra taxes which
his right honourable friend wad should be open
for the consideration of the house this year.
They had therefore a large deficit to deal with. He might
be told that they had prealictel lard year that it would ba
very much larger. Well, that was true—(bear)—they did
predict that it would be larger. and they were quite justified
in doing so ; for at that time the spirit duties stood at 14.
Instead of at 10a. per gallon, to which they were ultimately
raised, and the paper duties were not repealed as they were
at lint to have been. The raising of the spirit duties made
• difference of 1,500,0001., and the paper duties were
soother 1,300.000/., making together • sum of
2,800,0001., which would have 'aimed the deficit to
11,000,0001. or 12,000,0001., which was what they
(the onpositioe) said they would have to deal with this
year. (Cheer.) He congratulated the right ham rear
man in some respects upon his policy. No death there
were portions of it which had proved very satis4 astory ; bat
at the same time they must look at it as a whole, sad not
let their gam rest upon • single bright feature, when there
was so smith et gloom in the picture. (Hear , bear.) Last
year the deficit bad been about 2,500,000 f. The right boo.
gentleman said that there was • sum of 300,0001. which
really belonged to the previous year; bet that, on reflection,
was a mode of calculation on which he would hardly
care to insist, because if he took credit for that
300.000/. he must be prepared to give credit for the
MOW. which was outstanding on the vote of credit for
the Llama 'vodka:la. (Hear, hear.) The deficit last year,

then, was 2,568,000/. ; and how had that been met' The
right hon. gentleman mid he had taken 1,450,000/. out of
the balances in the Exchequer, and had added 460,0001. to
the unfunded debt of the country. But the first observa-
tion that suggested itself on that statement was that
1,41'40001. and 460,0001. did not make 2,568,0001. (Cheers.)
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER—I never pro-
fessed to state how the deficit was met. (Hear, bear.)
Sir S. NORTHCOTE—Then the right hon. gentleman
ought to have done so. (Cheers.) But the only figures he
bad given the house were the two sums which- he (Sir S.
Nortlicote) had quoted, and like many other bon. gentlemen
he had ever since been puuled to make out the difference.
He would state to the house bow he supposed the matter
stood. In the first place, it was absolutely necessary to
take into consideration an item which the right lion. goals-
man designedly and deliberately told the house ee should
omit—the vote for the fortifications. This year the loan on
that account had amounted to very little. Only 200,0001.
had been borrowed, of which only 50,0001. had been ex-
pended ; but though the item wee now a small one, it would
probably be larger in subsequent years, and he must protest
against its omission from the account. Besides the two
sums he bad mentioned—the 454,000/. addition to the un-
funded debt and 1,300,000/., the diminution of the balances
in the Exchequer reckoning the fortification vote—he found a
third item, repayment of themes, 627,000/. Now, be
wanted to know what these were, for he believed that a
good deal would turn upon them. He supposed that they
were repayments of the loans advanced for public works. If
that were so, this was another addition to the debt of the
country, foe though the money had been borrowed many
years ago, it had originally been raised by loan, and what
was now paid in ought to have been lent out again. IL
however, it was now used for the services of the
year it was virtually a new loan ; and he did not think it
ought to have been so used without the sanction of perils-
meat, or without explanation to the house. (Cheers.
It might be that he (Sir S. Northcote) was in error in tbe)
conclusion at which he had arrived; but if so, be could only
repeat that the right hon. gentleman ought to have informed
the house how the deficit of last year had been made up,
and then he (the hon. baronet) should have been in no dan-
ger of drawing a false deduction. At present it appeared
to him that they had made an addition to the debt in the
year of no less than 1,257,0001., besides largely drawing
upon the balances in the Exchequer ; besides which he
ought to add another million for Exchequer bills not paid
off ; and then the addition to the debt in the course of lath
year would stand at two millions and a quarter. (Hear.)
There was, moreover, an army excess of 200,0001.—h0w woe
that to be paid? Was it also to be taken out of the Exche-
quer balances, or was it to be thrown upon the revenue of
the coming year? in which, by the bye, there was no provi-
sion for it. He could imagine hon. gentlemen exclaiming,
"What in the world are these balances?" No doubt they
were partly made up of accumulations of surrendered services;
but to a very large extent they consisted of sums already
appropriated. It might be a very pleasant thing to have a
large balance at one's banker's, but if against that balance
there were large claims and cheques outstanding, it would be
ica gratifying. It certainly seemed to him that if ever there
was a time when it was desirable to have the Exchequer
balances strong it was now ; whereas the right hon. gentle-
man admitted that they were 700,000 t. leas than they were
this time last year. (Hear, bear.) They were told that
there was a surplus of 1,900,0001. ; and he (Sir S. North-
cote) suppmed that bad been very fairly calculated. Of
course there was always some risk of such failures is those
which they had had last year, and which had undoubtedly
resulted from the unfortnnete harvest, on which they could
not calculate ; though it might, to be sure, have been cal-
culated upon at the time the right hon. gentleman produced
his supplementary budget. The only point on which be
felt doubt was the 750,0001. of China money. He really
could not understand the explanation which bad been girth
by the noble lord (Lord J. Mown) on that woes. At one
time the noble lord seemed to think there would be
600,000/. ; while at another be spoke of only 200,000/. ; and
there appeared to be some uncertainty in his mind as to
whether the merchants were to reosive their compensation
la the first year. It was most important that with so small
• surplus the house should receive more explicit informa-
tion, for at present the explanations which had
been given were anything but satisfactory. (Hear, hear.)
Last year they were asked for 3,800,000/. for the extras..
dinary expenses of the army and navy. They granted that
sum, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer told them he
had no occasion to pay more than a little over 3,000,000/.,
and consequently there was a balance of 750,0001. still un-
'pent. He asked the right hon. gentleman if that sum was
cow available if called for, but the right hon. gentleman
was obliged to tell him that it was not in his power to say,
but that it still remained good for the service of the year
therefore that 760,0001. war as good as gone. It was
possible that this 1,00),000/. which they were about to take
for the service of the year might not be required for
this year, but there was the money in the Ex-
chequer, liable to be drawn out. Ile did feel that
in all the provisions of the financial arrangements
this was the one which required the most careful scrutiny,
and was the least satisfactory. (Hear.) He thought, there-
fore, the house ought to have more full explanations of our
financial position than they had yet had. (Hear.) With
regard to a provisional budget, he thought if there was any
proposition upon which financiers were fully agreed it was
that it was very undwimbly to live upon • system of pro-
visional finance. It mart, for instance, be very diadem-
tsgeous to those who were dealing in tea and sugar not to
know from year to year what the taxes on those articles
were to be. (Hear.) The Chancellor of the Exchequer
told them that with regard to two articles, tea and
sager, the duties hid been stationary during the
last two yews ; but did not the right bon gen-
tleman know the stationary character of these imports.?
The merchants looked for the estimates of the Chancellor
of the Exchequer, and about the middle of July next they
would look for a considerable reduction in the tea duty ;
but when they had imported their teas, they would find the
reduction had not been made, and they would be obliged
to keep them in bond. (Hear, bear.) It was true there
might be conditionsin our trade under which we might be
content to vote some of our taxes for one year. Last year
oar exports were 136,000,0001. ; for the first two months of
the present year they were only 3,570,000/., being a rubs:-
Goa et 161 per cent., which was lower than any year
since 1857. They were told that our import trade
was going on satisfactorily, but they did not im-
port many of those articles because the taxes
bad been taken off, but because there was a deficient har-
vest in this country, and they were obliged to buy food in
other countries. lie connected that with the very remarkable
decline in our trade with the United States, for he found
that during those first two months there was a total decline
on various articles amounting to 37 per cent. (Hear, hear.)
He thought that was another of that there might be a
neceseity for a provisional W. and to vote the taxes for
a short time only. But if that was so, should they at the
same time withdraw a large sum from the permanent sources
of the taxation of the country? (Hear, hear.) They had,
moreover, to me what would be the working of the treaty
with France. He believed that working would be satisfac-
tory. (Hear, bear.) They had also got to see what
would be the seeking el the alterations in the spirit duties.
On the sugar and tea duties they might, if necewity re-
quired, re-impose a duty of a penny a lb., but if they re-
=the paper duty it was lost altogether. He therefore en-
the house to pause before theycommitted themselves
irrevocably tothe repeal of this tax. He was satisfied with the
proposal as to the income tax. He believed that 81. in the
pound would be 'akin, to balance tho account, but as they
did not know what mkt happen it was as well that the
rate should be 9d. The Chancellor of the Exchequer
might reply that he hoped to reduce the expenditure,
but that was a hope they might indulge in too long.
The right hon. gentleman had been in Wiles near two years,
but he had not done much in the way of reduction. He
did not blame him. The feeling of the house, the feeling of
the country, and he dared say the feeling of his colleagues,
had been too strong for him. He hoped that the home
would not part with the substance for the shadow.
Mr. S. FITZGERALD moved the adjournment of the
debate.

Lord PAL3fERSTON mid he could offer no objection at
th►t time of the night to the adjournment. Of course the
adjournment would be to Thursday, but he thought that
the announcement c the boo. member (Mr. Bentinck)
th►t the debate would last many nights was not intended
to be a true mediction. lie hoped that in consenting to an
adjournment to Thursday, seeing that there would be so
man' opportunities in committee for members to state their
opinions on the resolutions, the debate would end on that day.
Mr. DISRAELI said they ought to remember that this
was the only occasion on which strictly according
to the rules of the house they could have a dis-
cussion on the whole project of the government. He
assured the noble lord that lie had no wish to obstruct the
of business, but he was quite convinced that if they
first a full discussian on the budget, they would make
much mom progress than if they were confined to separate
discussions on the resolutions. For his own port, lie bad
not mode up his mind as to what course he should take
upon the resolutions. Very much would depend on the
course of the debate and on the tore of the ministers.

Tho CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he was
quite sure it was oot the intention of his noble friend to
oomplain of the course which bad been pursued. The
course taken by the lion. member for Huntingdon was one
which he was quite entitled to take : and he, for one, was
pleased that he did take it, bemuse it gave to every member
an eqq.ortunity of asking for explanation. He agreed with
the right hou. goutlenoin that they had every reason to
anticipate that the result of a disc USIIOII of this kind would
be raid...tory. 11., war anxious that the discussion should
rat Ise abridrod ; hut it wait very desirable, owing to the
complicated arnumemeuta of the revenue department, that
the dr. iaimr of the house upon the subject of the income
tag should be taken as aeon II possible, and he therefore
trusted that tie debate would terminate on Thursday. If
not be should ask fir leave that the discussion should go on
from day to day till the matter was disposed of.
The motion for the adjournment of the debate was then
pat and agreed to.
ILX/MBINATION OF PARISHFA DISSOLUTION
(SCOTLAND) BILL.
Mr. DUNLOP obtained leave to bring in a bin to make
provision for the dissolution of combinations of parishes in
Scotland as to the --went of the

is /1.4, management AI poor.
PUBLIC OFFICES EXTENSION BILL.

On the motion of Mr. Cowrie Colonel DllOOO sod CoL
French were added to the select committee on this bill.
The bowie adjourned at 12 o'clock.

Mr. A. Bmugh, wine and apirit merchant, of
11, Strand, has attsrd.. his prices in acoardenee with the further
seduction of the wine duties. lie it now selling escedient Port
and Sherry at IS., per dozen, and a good sound Claret at 13e. per
dozen, bottles tociaded.—(Ldverttsentent.l

Lab) inulligtnct.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.—Aran. 22.

Sittings in Bsace in Eager Term.—(Before Laid Chief
Justice Cockburn, sad Justices Crompton, Hill, sad
Blackburn.)
THE QUEEN V. B07E:I.-WAKEFIELD ELECTION.
. . .

To-day having been fixed for the arguments in this case
Mr. Edward James said he understood the ease was wit
to be proceeded with, in consequence of the illness of his
learned friend Mr. Cleasby, and he should like to know
what other clay their lordships intended to appoint for it.
The Lord Chief Justice—Make your own arrangements
with the other side. It involves a question of some import.
ance, and, as we should like to have a full court when it
comes on, let us know what understanding you have
arrived at.

Mr. Edward James subsequently informed the court that
the Solicitor-General and he bad agreed to appoint Thurs-
day for the arguments.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.—Aran. 22.

The court at in Banco, and were engaged in hearing
argumenta in two cases—one a demurrer, and the other as
to the erection of some buildings—of not the slightest
public interest.
Sittings at Nisi Prins.—(Before Mr. Baron Channell and
Common Juries.)
DAHVILL V. TKERT.-INTERPLEADER.

Mr. Hawkins and Mr. Raymond were counsel for the
plaintiff. Mr. M. Chambers and Mr. Garth represented
the defendant.

This wee an interpleader issue to try the right of the de-
fendant to seize certain goods belonging to • person named
Beatty, at Farnham, the plaintiff's brother-in-law. It ap-
peared from the plaintiff's case that he carried on business
at Farnham, as • draper, and in Iteio Mr. Beatty was
anxious to proceed in the Courts of Insolvency and Bank-
ruptcy, when e►e plaintiff lent him 1501., for which Mr.
Beatty gave • bill of sale on his furniture. The de-
fendant and !lastly had been at litigation, and the former
recovered a jodgusent'against the latter, on which an execu-
tion was put in, and the goods now claimed were seized.
No witnesses were called for the defence, and
The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff.

COURT OF PRORATE AND DIVORCE.
Aran. 22.

(Before the Judge Ordhlar7, Mr. Justice Wiegman, and
Mr. Judo* Williams.)
_ 110111 TON V, DOTNYON. _ _

In this cue lire IficeintOo had procured a dissolution of
her marriage, on the ground of cruelty and adultery. In
the month of Ju1y,1849, when a girl of 17, she had eloped
with the respondent, and was married to him at fia.deregia,
Hanover-square, by a license obtained by Captain Boynton
upon a false affidavit. The fugitives were pursued by the
young lady's mother and stepfather, and they were over-
taken a few bows after the marriage. Under threat of
proceedings for making the false affidavit, Chpisin Boynton
wee induced to sign a paper which was convected into a post-
nuptial settlement. By this instrument it was provided
that Mrs. Boynton should receive two-thirds of the annual
premeds of her fortune (which consisted of about 18,700(.
in stock), and that the husband should receive the remdning
third, with benefit of survivorship, and remainder to the
hem of the marriage, by their joint appointment or by the
appointment of the survivor. In the event of there being
no issue the money was to revert to the wife's family.
There had been one child born of the marriage.•
Mr. Macaulay, Q.C. (with whom was Mr. Jones), now
applied to the court to direct the custody of this child to
be given up to Mrs. Boynton, and that the whole of the
annual proceeds of the settled property should be paid
to her.

Dr. Spinks appeared for Captain Boynton.
The court sad that if Captain Boynton lost the custody
of his son it would be owing to his own misconduct, whereas
it would be bard to deprive a mother of her child because
she had had the misfortune to be united to such a man.
With regard to the second application before the court, it
would be indeed strange ui these days, and after
the passing of the act constituting the court,
if a divorced husband could be allowed to retain
for his own benefit property which had originally belonged
to the woman, and when be bad violated all the
duties of the relation that he had contracted with her.
Dude, the eimumsMacee a/ the cm* Yrs. Boynton must,

till further orders, have the custody of the chili!, reasonable
Gomm being reserved to the respondent ; and the whole
of the proceeds of the settled property must be paid to
her, or in the event of her death must be devoted to the
benefit of her son. The child must not be removed from
the jurisdiction of the court without permission, but no
order would be made as to costs.