The Express.
London, England, 1857-02-03 00:00:00

UAW Enttlll

SPRING CIRCUITS OF
SOUTH WALKS AND CHI
TaiddrderarM.u.o4, it,wd.r.„...,...n0n Nstscor,...thufe.,!olitli
5...—......""' ""'Tolrlds"4l 11:41erfth'orti"wheorr
. rub. Sloe ran Ana. Pernßrnic
......4
. Kai* 11. at Csrdtpso. Czn
,'- im . , Borough of Carinart
. . Koren 21. at Rms. 1
, Crioner sad CUT, Nits
NORFOLK CI R
Lord Cblsil Hiroo ear Mr. Ju.tio
bare silo made the folloolos arm
Monday, 111•Ttil 9, nt Ayt..1...r.
j"Pri'd. 4WlhYibanc:,l:::.)7i4re'',7744g
, liszcn 31, jthe Qatte w
Mee dar, at the Oulkinsil
ono Coo.. ,T.—Mr. Justice eternal
Lord
"ri, *III pr reed on ibis drcult, but
ds)" oo the Midland, Nurthrro
Vibes tore Wowed in the .. Daily Nos
liz. J imUcc Colcridso will be Ow ram*

COURT OF QUEEN'S
(Sittings at Nisi Prins, in
Campbell and Spam

This inn the tlrt:t 41,ty of tho P
COUtaiMPI 50 cruses, of which 13
Juries.
THE. atIEV, AT THE ritotrel
C. CORLEV.—YALSE DECLAHATIC
•Cf.

Mr. Tndcaux and Mr. Manis
mention; Mr. Serjeant Dallantii
defendant.
The indictment in this CIN eon
charging the defendant with bar
and wilfully wade a false maim
%end to the superintoudent regist
triet of a marriage intended to
and Constantia Campbell. The
Ilth of Ikcember, 1849, and tl
June, 1850. Tho fourth count
the registrar without reference t
statement relied on WWI as to M
described as 60 years of ace, wire
defendant well knew she wan upv
The defendant pleaded not gui
Mr. Prideauz, m stating the ci
grows ation aroeo under the Mar
IV., e. M. The fourth section
stage solemnised under the pr
of the parolee ohnuld debar
registrar a notice in the fnnn gi.
that form wars a column headed
up with the wards " Of full age"
tided that any person making
subject to the penalties of pegs
against the defendant under th
that all prosecutions under the
within three years after the offer
Lord Campbell considerrd the
limitfor all prosecutions under tl
Mr. l'rideaux submitted that
wider the act tusks' it sough
punishment provided by the elf
and although he might have Mtn
an offence against the statute. I
count, which did not refer to the
to support the indictment.
Lord Campbell would hold the
which the learned counsel bad re
force any particular penalty mac
must be taken to be founded on i
not pamed, the count could net 1
offence charged in it could not 1
proviso lathe 41st tertian was a
persons from vexatious prose cuts
been committed by the Menden
the statute, and as more than thi
should tell the jury that the pros
ported The
jury returned a verdict of
(Common

The declaration in this case
had debauched the plaintifti
tamed certain goods, the propert
ho had assaulted the plaintiff,
preened without reasonable caw
Tho defendant pleaded not gee
Mr. E. James and Mr. Web
Mr. M. Chambers and Mr. Peter
It uppoarod from the statement e
was connected with a roepeetoble
In 1844. Ito afterwards went to
family. In 1853, Mrs. Kennet
took ► bouso in Barrington-roe
who tarried on business' as a the
within a few doors of her. In 11
England, and he (omit his wife
menta in the defendane's house t
such information as left no doub
Ile found that she had removed e
defendant's house, and when he
fondant gave him into custody.
Farah 'Whittaker, who had h
when at Brixton, deposed that
habit of going to the efend►nt's
till a late hour. In Is' the d
and then went to live in Mr. Ke
a front roam. Mrs. Kenrick w
and took her meals there with h
his room after the others had gm
wituess went into the room, and
bed. On other (cautions she fo
fendant's knee, with his arm rev
children to eau him papa.
Cross-exeunined —The defends
while at Mrs. Kenrtek's house,
hie room.

Mary Whittaker sister of th 4
in defendant's tarried in Brixtet
nck was in the habit eomi
The defendant was ill at the tin
Mr. Ge ego thisis, who he
fondant, stated that Men. Kent
reside at the Kruse in the Mini

gpently soot her mule out of de
sheer c 4 may inetratem of imprt
Mr. Joseph A. Brirby stated
furniture from the defendant.

eTter;rarderrrmegtdthet. the '
be gave up the furniture to Mr
to Englund.
Mr. E. James proposed to ca
Mr. Eeteradord objertitl. Ai
of thaw in which the plaintiff
Lord Campbell would allow
be would confine his evident*
bitnre andtheasimult,

Mr. Richard K. Kenriek,
when he returned to Englam
the defendant's house. Some
and when he went to &roma
out. lie refused to go. Dile
roan. They all wont to the p
him with creating a diaturbanc
his wife and family were in th
for the lodgings. He was et c
Coset-cautatned—lt was adz
Went to the hon Defendein

Mr. E. thlllll'. Rimmed wtt
Mr. Petenalorlf addmemd tL
Contended that there was no el
•dotter, 7 Lem was no proof
tiria,lendence of the terms on
.
. .

Mr. E. James contended th
Dot put in issue the feet of tin
Lord Campbell would hot
Verdict fur Ito defendant, on t
versatien; Lut he would ask
that ad: tery bad icon ootnra
than to SWIM the damages,
plitotiff leave to move to enter
Tito "ury found that adul
tt the dunages at 201.
Lord Campbell nit he wool
defendant on the count for
the assault, Le would leave Vii
The jury found a verdict fu
this issue.

COURT OF BAN]
akfore Mr. Comm

IN RE EYARP,
The bankrupts wero men
business, in !full-slley, Los
nrainstion tooling.
Mr. Linklater, fur tho assig
Of two months. The recount

Mr. Luxe:ince, who appear
ohet to an ntijonnuttent at tl
The Counuirainuer—Anoth

These owes give us plenty
under the arrangement are of
bake an adjournment for two
Mr. Linklater consented to

The Canele.iou, —As I t
e=xhibited great diligence in r
think much conduct ought to
Of U. per week to each banks
Mr. Liectun, 0 hoped there
Mr. Linkinter fetid they rho
Sleeting in about a mouth.
Mews. Hort are engaged
counts. The liabilities are
assets, 30,0011/.
Adjourned for two menthe.
(Before Mr. Con

IN RR THE ROT.

This wee the day appoints
new eLarcboldera who anew
treated aa dubbin', but as ei
their having been induced ti
recitations on the part of 11

Corny:any.
At the last Fitting an adjo
resters that the courts at'
flounce a dorikion On this qua
the Court of Qumu's Bench