The Express.
London, England, 1868-04-24 00:00:00

')lPAEttfXfitffifily NAP't4Xf

THIRD EDITION.

THE FEN lAN TRIALS AT MR OM)
BAILRY.-(THIS DAT.)

(Before Lord Chief Jo/Um Coabirs and Bona
BrsinwelL)

When their lordships had taken their nate,
The Attorney-General informed them that having ears-
ielly considered the cans against O'Keefe he was of opi-
nion that the evidence as to identity and complicity wee
much too weak to warrant the crown in seeking a conyke
hem
The Lord Chief Justice and Baron Bramwell agreed with
the Attorney-General, and the jury accordingly retuned
a verdict of Not Guilty in the case of John O'Keefe,
who was then removed from the dock.
Mr. Straight then addressed the jury on behalf of
Timothy Desmond, remarking that the verdict ia the cane
of O'Keefe and Anne Justice had considerably lightened
his task. Having begged of them, in the first instance,
to remember that Timothy Desmond end William were
not brothers, as had been stated by the Attorney-General,
be proceeded to argue that one of the chief points in
favour of his client was the failure on the part of the
crown to establish any connection between him and
Mullany. Because Timothy Desmond was found near the
scene of the catastrophe in company with Anne Justice
were they to find him guilty of direct participation in the
awful crime which was perpetrated on the 13th of De-
cember? Referring to the comments which had been made
en the subject of Fenianiam in the course of the trial, the
learned counsel expressed his intention to dismiss them at
awe from his consideration, remarking that the greatest
blow that could be given to the Brotherhood was the eon-
viction which had been brought home to its members that
theiroo-oonspirstors were ever ready to stand in the witness-
box and put them within the grasp of the law. He was not
going to enter into elaborate observations as to informers,
but he should remind them that the calling of that clue
of persons was spoken of in a language of the bitterest
contempt by Sydney Smith, who as they were aware, was
one of the best judges of human nature that ever lived.
The attitude and conduct of Mullany in the dock were
sufficient to brand him with infamy. He shook and
trembled, and was afraid to look the prisoners in the face,
and the jury might be assured that he had come
there for no other purpose than to do his best
to sacrifice the lives of the men in the dock.
The placard with the word " rewind " accounted for
Vaughan's appearance in court. The probability was that
he was never • member of the Fenian brotherhood at all,
and it would be an insult to the intelligence and humanity
of the jury to suppose for one moment that the statements
of a man like him would have the slightest weight with
them. Dealing with the residence of identification given
by Clifford. one of the warden of the House of Detention,
the boy Charles Monty. and a man named Stratton, the
learned counsel contended that the failure of the two
latter to recognise Timothy Desmond at Bow-street, and
of the fanner to identify him positively when first arrested,
nullified the testimony they had given in the present trial,
and favoured the supposition that the manner in which the
witnesses bad been conversing together at the police court
during the several remands had created • conviction in their
minds that the men whose identification was required
must be those they had seen drawing the track in the
neighbourhood of the House of Detention. Touching the
conversation which was alleged by Vaughan to have
taken place between him and Desmond at the house of the
former, he (the learned counsel) was instructed by
Desmond to admit a portion of it, but to deny in
the most emphatic manner that anything was said
by him about "taking a jump," or that the
House of Detention was to be blown up. Those statements
were due to the inventive genius of Vaughan. That
Timothy Destnond was near the House of Detention on
the 13th of December was perfectly true, but it was • fact
that be was drunk on the occasion and that he had no real
motive for being there. Inspector Thompson said Des-
mond was drunk, and the statement that had been made
as to his being seen loitering about with Anne Justice con-
nected him with no criminal intention. Anno Justice's
acquittal proved the belief on the part of the crown
that she did not aid the prisoners, and even
if the one against her had not been abandoned
the admitted facts on the point would show that she
could have been of no possible assistance. She was in the
prison on the 13th, and knew that the prisoners had been
exercised in the morning, and, strange to say, those whose
tool she was supposed to have been, blew up the wall in
the afternoon, thinking that Burke and the other pri-
soners were then in the exercise ground. Desmond, he
submittal, was in the Jolly Coopers public-house when the
esplosion took place and he was naturally running from
there towards Short"abuildings when the police pursued
and arrested him. There was no reliable evidence to show
that he was one of the conspirators. The fact of his being
seta running was no proof of guilt, for the stoutest heart
could not have withstood the fear an by the explosion.
In conclusion, be asked the jury to acquit his client, and
to show by. their verdict that Fenian. and Irishmen alike
would receive justice and fair play at the hands of twelve
intelligent and impartial Englishmen.
Mr. Keogh then addressed the jury on behalf , f Nicholas
Esglioh. He said that it bad been admitted by the in•
former Mullany that English was not present at the first
meeting held tor the purpose of purchasing the powder.
He asked them to take that circumstance into their
serious consideration, and to disbelieve the alle-
gation of Mullany that his client attended the
meetings at the American Stores and in Castle-
market. The evidence of the informer on this point was
uncorroborated and their lordships would tell them that
the unsupported testimony of Mullany would not weigh
against the prisoners. Referring to the statement' that
hagfish was seen at Mrs. Martin's, the learned counsel
asked the jury to remember that Martha Kempsley and
her brother, who lived in that house, bad not seen English
there. One of the witnesses alleged that English was
:it Mrs. Blertin's six weeks before the explosion, but would
they tell him that an active participator in the plot for
blowing up the prison would not have played • different
part' He did not deny that his client knew the other
prisoner.. They all lived in the neighbourhood of Golden-
a In-are, and nothing could be snore natural than that they
should be seen together in • public-hone,. frequented by
persons of their class. Then with regard to the evidence
of identification, he begged to remind them that
English was lame, and that there could have been
nu difficulty in recognising a man of that kind. The
evidence, however, was contradictory, and that fact was
very much in favour of English. Then the most impor-
tant circumstance which favoured • belief in the pri-
soner's innocence was that of all the witnesses called by
the crown to prove the identity of the persons who were
alleged Ss have taken tart in the explosion, not one spoke
of having seen English near the House of Detention on the
13th of December. English had, it was said, taken part
in " Father O'Connor's" meeting, but it had already been
shown beyond doubt that that meeting had not the
slightest connection with the Fenian movement. Whoever
brought about the terrible destruction of life and property
at Clerkenwell, Nicholas English had nothing whatever to
do with it. The case against him was the concoction of a
miserable informer, who came forward not to promote the
ends of justice, but to avert the punishment which lay
I efore him by sacrificing his former associates.
)Ir. Sleigh, with the permission of the court, called
William Sparkes Hall, who deposed that he was a boot-
miker, carrying on business in Regent-street. He em-
ployed•good number of men. Since 1861, William Des-
mond had been one of his workmen, and was in his em-
ployment at the time of him arrest. He was • very steady,
industrious man, and earned more money than any man
in the shop.
11r. Baker Greene in a very able speech addressed the
try on behalf of the prisoner Barrett. He prefaced his
remarks by observing that this was the first time he had
ever defended • human being who was on trial for his
hie. and that he deeply felt the terrible and onerous
nature of the duty which devolved upon him. He then re-
ferred to the disadvantage which his client, in common
With the other priaoners, laboured by reason of his
poverty, and to the difficulty he had to encounter in getting
fasts for his defence. The jury were aware that the papers
teemed with applications for funds with which to defend
the prisoners, and while abstaining from indulging in
any comment upon the refusal of the Home Seers=
rave the required aid, he (the learned counsel) complained
of the system by which the prosecution were enabled to
put in the dock a number of men who were without
means or friends to procure legs/ sadstanoe, and charge
tten, with the awful crime of wilful murder. After re-
!' ring to the imposing array of counsel fin the crown, the
earned gentleman proceeded at once to deal with the evi-
dence affecting his client. He commiserated the Attorney-
f.eneral on being obliged to rely mainly upon the testimony
of Mullany, and in referring to that individual he (the
"vac(' counsel) might say shat if the crown wished to
w certain
ire a verdict the best step towards attaining that
rn,l would be to place him in the dock and charge him
with wilful and corrupt perjury. He then proceeded to
ltdlV the attention of the jury to the discrepancies that
arisen in the evidence adduced for the prosecution
"'"'"Ting that he hoped the Attorney-General would
explain them in has reply. The witnesses Morris
51'1h
wiC94,el had spoken of Barrett as a man
huken and no moustache ; Vaughan spoke of him
, utin with • heard and slight moustache, and Mullein
ral given a different description of him. Remarking that
*RS reirtieularly desirous e jury should bear in mind
'cst tio
producedth by the crows connected
77.,1 with the Fenian movement, he went on
„ te that the crown had endeavoured firstly to
t's pretence in Pulteney-eourt, where the powder
1,14.1 'tared before the explosion, and sseessilly to Az his
"ace in Clerkenwell on the day of the explodes.
‘4' evidence on the former paint he contended
thin mat halatidaaturY. immesh as they had
that Martha Kmniadey, the girl who lodged

ai are. Martin's, tailed tu Mentify Barrett when,
laS fin* law him Milt lla arrest. Her Mee of
him eit the mead eiseedis whoa her hand hhn
broiled cep_
*kw kerealli &sal he =llmea
3kettionedlidth. The Mime el the nists bendier se
fle nea fa Pebener-eseare wee equally He
He timatht the mutt ha eased,' their
milthemes. peeve that Berutirs whiskies were le*
,eat that he were • =aloe heard,
eat Ore he were a Wee
enneet. the loadlety el W
Bell bs!riffialS, Amen year tin Keen of isearellea, idea.
tilted Barrett by his having wee* a big herd, but
u there had been evict's** of the mese nabedie.
tory nature on this pint he argued that the are
of the crown so far was very beeempleee. The
evidence of a poeitive nature es to Barrett bake
near the House of Detention on the day of the explosion
rested with four witnesses. frau Al em was see of Woe,
and he stead that being in Corporation-Iwo on the 13th
of December he sawßarrett moieties another maa in
a barrel off a truck. Allem in crouexamisatios admittedli
that he saw two men standing at the corner of the passage
opposite and that one of them was the man Jeremiah
who was arrested immediately after the explosion
on the present charge, but subsequently relseed en
the ground that he was an agent of the police.
Allant's evidence was totally oppoesd to that given by
Bird, the dairyman, which was of a singular ohs:aster.
The former said that Barrett crowed the road
and assisted the other man in taking the barrel off
the track, whereas Bird unhesitatingly stated
that after the barrel had been put on the pavement he
saw • man, whom he identified as Barrett, walk from the
end of the street cross the road, and lean over the barred.'
In discharging his duty towards his client he might
atop at the inadequacy of the case of the crown'
and at the utter failure on their part to
identify Barrett with the man Jackson referred to
by Mainly. But he would not do so, and before be sat
down be was satisfied be would establish the inno-
cence of his client beyond doubt. He would satify them
that Barrett was not In Corporation-lane, nor in Londos,
nor yet in England on the day of the explosion,
(Expressions of surprise.) Barrett was by occupation a
stevedore. He was an Irishman, and bad worked
in Glasgow since August last up to the One
of his arrest, when be was in company with a'
friend of his named O'Neill. Being an Irishman, he
had warm sympathies with what were allied ultra-Irish
views. Then the boy Homely stated that while looking out
of the second floor window of his parents' residence, be
saw Barrett apply the fuse to the barrel, and that the
explosion occurred coos after. The day, It should be retain'''.
bered, was a very gloomy one, and that !act coupled with the
circumstancethat the boy had no particular reason for ob-
serving the man who he alleged was Barrett, rendered his
identification of him six weeks afterwards, by what he
termed the peculiarity of his eyes, and under doubtful
cimumatances, unreliable in every respect Another va-
riation in the story as to Barrett's identity was to be
found ia the evidence of the boy Wheeler, who stated that
be saw Barrett coming round the end of the
lane, and go and apply the fuse. Counsel then referred to
Police-constable Moriarty, whom absence from the trial
he commented upon, adding that the evidence of • man
who was so close to the barrel at the time of the explo-
sion, and who, being in the service of the
crown, could not be expected to be favourable
to the prisoners, would be of very great importance.
He went on to say that on the 23rd of November there
was • torchlight procession in Glasgow, and he would show
them that Barrett was there. On the 13th of December a
meeting took place at the Bell Hotel, in Glasgow, Mr.
111`Corry, the editor of a Glasgow paper, was
in the chair, and that gentleman and an-
other would tell them that Barrett was present
at the meeting. He would also satisfy them that
on the 12th, 13th, and 14th of December, Barrett was seen
in Glasgow by three men who had not the slightest object
in coming to truth in his favour, cod who would swear
positively that Barrett read the account of the explosion
to them on the morning titer which it had taken place.
Mr. Greene then produced Michael DeNulty, who de-
posed—l am a boot and shoemaker. I carry on my busi-
ness in my own house in Glasgow. I know the pri-
soner Barrett. I have seen him three times et
my hone., and once in London. The first time
I saw him was on Thursday evening, the 12th
of December. when he came to my place in com-
pany with a man named Mullen. He asked me if I
would sole and heel a pair of hoots, and I told him I
would, and promised to have them ready the next evening.
Barrett came the next evening, and then I had not
touched the boots. He asked why I had not repaired
the boots, and I told him he had been in too greet a
hurry with his work. He then asked me when I
would have them done, and I replied the next
day. He returned the next day about 3 o'clock,
and then the boots had not been touched. He then com-
menced so abuse me, and celled me anything but a geed -
man. (Laughter.) He then cooled down a bit. Two
shoemakers of mine came in, and I asked them to do
me a favour—to sole and heel a pair of boota.
They mid! they would have them done between 6 and 7.
While the boots were being repaired Barrett sent out for
an evening paper. The paper was brought in and Barrett
read about the explosion in London. At that time he had
to the beet of my belief about three or four days' beard on
him. I have never seen him since. A man named
M'Alantut Game with a letter to me, and I gave him infor-
mation.

By the Attorney-General-4 live at Bridgegate-street
in Glasgow. I have not a shop, but I have a house. I
work for any persovis who bring it to me. I work for Mr.
Johnson and Mr. Mahone. Mr. Mallen, who has been re-
ferred to, is a shoemaker. He works for Mr. Beeson.
I don't know where Mr. Nowa lives now. I knew when
he lived ten months ago. I have known Mullen twelve
months.

By the Lord Chief Justice— Mullen oould not undertake
any work unless it had been given through his master.
By the Attorney-General—l last saw Mullen about the
commencement of January. That was at a soiree and
ball. They were not of • Fenian character. Mullen is a
married Irian, and has a wife and family. lie lived at
Candlerigpatreet, hut I cannot tell you the number.
[The examination was proceeding when our report left. ]

LAW INTELLIGENCE.-(THIS DAY.)

EQUITY COURT.
(Before Viee.CYaneellor ()Ward.)
LTON r. HONK.

This coupe WWI resumed. Mr. Matthews, Q.C., con-
tinued the cross-examination of Mrs. Lyon, the plaiatiff.

She said she did not recollect seeing Mr. Wilkinson on
the 7th of January. Except that part of the conversation
which relates to Lady D. it was substantially a correct
statement. Supposed Mr. Wilkinson left the deeds. Very
likely she desired him to read ever the draft deeds. She
executed the deeds on some day in January. Believed the
deeds were read over. Did not remember hawing her arm
round Mr. Home's neck on that occation ; certainlynot; but
did remember his having one arm round her waist, and his
other hand on her head, smoothing her hair. This was
whilst the deeds were being examined. He sat upon the
chair next to her, on the right hand aids. Did not repot.
lest mentioning this to the solicitor. Did not recollect
where the seal was taken from. Did not read.
lect the conversations with Mr. Hartley, one of the
attesting witnesses. [Letter of the 28th of January reed,
in which she wrote to Home, hoping be was better, and
asking him to inquire of the *rite whose was the face
they had given her to look at now, and saying Are had
never seen such a facie before, and could it be —.] Said
she could not explain whole the face was ; it was are of the
delusions she was subject to, and which continued for some
time after Home had left. Supposed she was asleep. Three
days was nothing for the magnetic influence to LA. Could
not supply the blank. It was a delusion. Might have
known Mr. Frederick Kent then. " Ho was no more to
me than you are." Did not think " Fred. Kent" had
called upon her at that time. Might have seen him at
the Atkin:mum. Did not know whether she had seen
Mr. Gibson at that time. The allusion was not to Mr.
Kati nor to Mr. Gibson. There was • conversation with
Mr. Dyne. Might have said that " Satire" ought to go
to Eton. [Letter read, in which she said he was • most
extraordinary porton—he must be either cracked,
or medium.] She thought him a most ridi-
culous man, because he said he could put his
thoughts into other people. Thought Dyne ridiculous, but
nevertheless wrote to say Home might some day be a
"wonderful man" like him. On the 10th of March she
went to the Athens= to get • letter rightly dated and
addressed, that had been wrongly dated and addressed.
Did not call for any other purpose. Did not desire
to get possession of any other letters. Did not get any
other letters from Mr. Phillips. Took the trouble
to go to a man's rooms to alter the date of a letter, end
could not remember whet alteration she made. Being
shown the letter, said she altered " terrace" into " plans."
Phillips brought her the letter after her wilt. Did look
at some other letters out of euriosity ; looked at her own
lotions—some el them. Did not recollect the last
time she signed "affectionate mother." Remem-
bered that she did leave off signing " mother ;"
deliberately left off signing " your affectionate mother,"
left off Gelling Hesse " eon " by depose, because she did
not wish to be at such intimate terms with him. Hem
had never shown any taste for the society of Mim Peel.
Knew he hated her, only said what she had said by way
of satire. Ellis Clyatow was a dirty story-
telling slut, and • very dangerous wen s& She
always celled Home an impostor, not to her
(Hrs. Lyon), but to Mrs. Pepper. Never spoke to Elm
Olyesew, except when she could not help it. Sometimes

west istifibaMidittltikaireggies. set talk to
Inisa Clibow,.ixisirtneAtb. rag. She
was a most effessive wow., nimbi* MO, the mem.
stress's eridesci., wee all Wee. Talked to her about bug.
sea. nothing else. Mr. Terra wee an Dabs Comic-master.
DM net come mesh to her rem. Came be IHraZeggerb
4)44001 reediest Whig Dr. Galley that Hss.'h We we
be Seeger, and bombe Idea to lot her ge t. hise. "Nell'
was the giber et Dr. Gulley. Big bled to esplais,
" Kiss Mad! is falling off ; withered towers esd algae
brews al Men We head," said she bold it had a letter
et Homes, mosalng that at a abase at Herne's Ilea NH
had sticks sod towers thrown at her bed. Adesiteed
she bade ebbe while* Hese was sway ; *be were
bet no raps, that she remembered. Fred. Ent
was pretest at env, Dr. Wlleasisub also. The last bane*
with Miss Nieltolls was at Albseatenses, at lira
Pepper's. Had a banes with Mn. Berry in
Jane. Flowers and everlasting. were thrown ; many
raps, and spirits walked about the floor. It was after
tea ; tea first, sod spirits afterward.. It was a pleasant
erasing altogether. The last ebbe of Fred. Heat she
bald net recollect the dais of, but the trial was seine on.
There were only Fred. Heat and a little girl preeent.
Never said to Clymow that Fred. Heat was her see that
wee to be. Certainly not. Being asked to produce her
'rawer to Hocates letter complaining that he bald not
sleep, because she did not call hint bar affectionate as.,
said she had not got it. [lt was not prodneed.l Re-
membered sending for Mr. Jencken shout the end of May.
He mime. She did not complain of Home's absence from
her ; it could be wen from all her letters that she wished
Home to be further from her. Never bid kimthat Bane
sad Wilkinson had conspired to take away her
property. That was all concocted by the spiritualists.
Ceesidered Socha a rude, impertinent, oontradiesons

" boy" : did not know •tout his vriskeasuses. Had an
reason to think seek a child as that was looking forward
to her death. Never writes poetry : had written some-
thing, but did not call it poetry.
On a letter of her own being read with the
words, "Oh ! bad some power the 'info gle us,"
&c., the plaintiff exclaimed, in an animated
tom, " Oh, had some power ! ' Oh, wed some power,' you
mean. Did you never read Robert Buena's poetry ? It
must be a misprint." Said she had no meaning in writing
about "over the water to Charlie," and " the merry days
of good Queen Bess" ; it was nonsense.—" Did you never
write nonsense!'" (Laughter.) Had opened a book
with a cover addressed "D. D. Home, 8K.."
accompanied by • small note ; but that was
by mistake. It came to her room by mistake. All his
Jotters were addressed to the Athenieuto. Had asked
Home for the key of his lodgings in June, because Mrs.
Pepper wanted it for • lodger. Wes never in apprehen•
don of her life from Home. " She was • poor
sickly creature, and was not likely to hurt
anybody." The first thing that opened her eyes was
when Daniel denied thattbe spirits had anything todo with
It. We bad had a quarrel ; that was just before he weft
to Malvern she second time. When Daniel denied that
the spirits bad anything to do with it, she supposed she
contradicted him. Could not recollect anything else
that opened her eyes. Lady Drumm told her that the
spirits were not to be relied on ; and wished Hon e
had told her so ; that was at the time. Knew that Lady
Dunsany had not made an affidavit in that cause. Mr.
Gibson did not assist in convincing her that she had been
deceived—not until near the end. Did not complain to
Perdicans that she was tied to a dying man. How
could she be tied to a dying man who was not
her husband ? The scraps of paper from which
the book was written were written long before her eyes
I were opened. OD being questioned uto • passage in the
books said it was never intended to come into court. On
the pewee describing Home, peeping at her through his
hands, looking at her like • deadly snake, and as if her life I
would not have been safe with him abroad, said she
did not know when that part might have been written ;
or a passage describing Home as a "greedy, fawning,
sneaking hypocrite," said it was not written to come
into court. Her solicitor told her it must be
given up. Was not getting up her narrative when
she went to Home's lodgings to correct the date.
Questioned as to the passage " The spirits I used to
see tell me that I shall be very great," I did not know
whether it referred to • visdan or a dream ; it was some
nonsense. "Do you never dream nonsense!" Would not
swear it was in her handwriting. Thought it was of no
consequence. Questioned as to the passage, " Yon are far
happier as my wife than if you were Duchess of North-
umberland ;" did not know when or by whom were they
obliterated.
The cross-examination was being continued when our

report left.

commit Nopiyam-Aisiti .D4r.)

_ .
. -
nunusinar ?Li d% '
Lc . . .. .. 1
°Was Blaqpia": ... 't

9 raa.
HURDLE EMIL
Carina _ 1
Mask Prince _ 3
13 tap. Wiaasc.ailialad
11E:41140 STEEPLECHASE. sad a to
Ababa* limas; Esadolios, , da
Pkias, Waddlas .11ary
Doom Charlie, Vislast, Moue, , and Praak.9;
are Sam
SURREY 0/tAND OPEN OTEMPLECAIIII. Tares
_amass sad a kW. _ _

TM Doctor, Pearl Direr, FieWeitug, Hoven, The Bob-
ber, Daisy, Penakmar, Angiodiszoa, Noose, L. S. D.,
sod Bleak Move are bora.

SHIRLEY PLATE. Five furleags.
Oeinealart. Lague, Watehbox, Dr. Wilson, Diamond,
Heckler, Solitaire, Gsy Lad, mkt, Pocket Hermilee,
Neningten„ Lorenzo di Ludt, and Little Coates. All are
here.
HUNTERS' ETILEPLBCHASE. Three nines.
Violent, Leotard, Patience, La Pique, Rattier, Brilket,
Sibyl, Bandoltne, Balder, Brown Charlie, and exismett.
All are here.

BUTTING 124 LONDON.-(TH18 DAY.)

!.39 P.N.

♦ large attendance, and several Important changes en
the Two Thousand. Rasicrusiaa, after being kW against
at 6to 1, was backed at sto 1 ; while Forams, after
misting with support at 5 to 1, had 6 to 1
laid awl sewed against her. The changes were
again rung on Green Sleeve and Blue Gown, the
nrst•nsmed advancing to 10 to 1, and the latter
driven to 1,000 to 80 ; Le Samaria was supported
heavily at 8i to 1 ; Moslem also came to a abort
price, and Vale Royal looked a trifle healthier. There
was no particular change on the Derby, but for the
Chester Cup 850 to 100 was booked in favour of Paul
Zoom Prices as follows :

TWO THOUSAND GUINEAS.
sto 1 apt Rogarnaian (t and off)
6to 1 Foment (t)
7 to 1 Paoe (1 and off)
800 to 100 Green Sleeve (t)
100 to 12 Le Sarre:in (1 to 25014
100 to 12 Yak Royal (t)
100 to 9 Modem (off, 100 to 8t f)
20 to 1 St. Ronan (t)
1000 to 30 Chelsea (I and effl
40 to 1 Homelier (1)
1000 to 30 Blue Gown (t sod off)
1000 to 30 Lord Glasgow's lot (off )
CHESTER CUP.
810 to 100 apt Paul Jonas (t)
DERBY.
10 to 1 apt Speculum (t and off)
10 to 1 Green Sleeve (off)
100 to 6 Peso (off, 20 to 11)
1000 to 50 Blue Gown (t)
1000 to 40 Tom Bowline o (1)
4000 to 100 L Sannsin (t)
40 to 1 Earl (off, t 1000 to 20)
1000 to 10 Franchise (off)