The Express.
London, England, 1850-07-30 00:00:00

TUESDAY EVENING, JULY 80, 1860.

THE EXPRESS.

DRAMA.
OLYMPIC_

This down lag beittAM-tietiiir six algbibs, sadly
the mmegment of Mr. Gomm B Kea, Me begat MO
main with a revival ef so The Maleseiest," • play by
Mantes, one of the drumusts of .tb. ZUs Mahan
age, *mil he me hardly be mid to belong Se that
bright emessliedoe with& lasladol latekspeare, Jos-
ses, Dessmeet Fleteher, MesdargZd. sad
Karam With the '101111•11 et these moo,
that Maritsa Nowt be elassedutit aed. marl-
few of their plays (se as *en
a Maurboween). km bees possible Mao to
the Robes stage, it mull hardy be expeMed la bN ea
astelir rises eases the wart .ea ea whet se Mask their
Wake la an the quibble of a dramatis pent. The plays M
▪ doemiseee we Mis maid, sad several Mama though
fve Kam see mad, are rah tresses of LOA Mora.
awe, awl hailine ho gerweeliy mitre. Thom of
Karam ere breslinia, ie thet of
asset. map. by Mom
who like to asplare the Women regions of the
saint drams. Hs hie the faults Si his greater
esstampsearise, sot rammed by their bsouties.
While we entirely disapprove of the prods/Km of this
ploy, we must add that it was earidelly get up sad respeetably
ealled. The performs's, excepting Mrs. Bromism, ware
stmegers to N. That lady tad to swabs the odious part we
base avowed, sad it roast have bees pahsfal, we @koala
think, is, her Is do ea Kr. 11. Lea, Mr. Kamm, Mr.
Jakastaae, sad Mr. Marshall seem to be vase of talent.
whiah we hope to am better employed. When the senate
ha the.. was very loud tat by so names Emma applause,
with audible meads ofdisapprobation. Every plow, geed
e&is Sew a sapappleedsd mere or low ; bet it is is*
that seek a pass se this mold bb saadastory to the
rt7f su lieglish radians*.
The ploy wee /ennead by a harangue pleas thigh wee
the old Oiymple, tolled " The Pets of the Ballet ;"
Cri by at
the farm at the " Weaver."

RAS intelitattleg. . •
HOUSE OF LORbS.—TBITIZDAT.
Pawn : Ulm Snootinma (rufflsom) aim less patens.
Tan Dual or Ilautionaa . t..Mese Ilaware Ain
Onus.
This weal hem the Court of Sissies reeposting the right,
of the respendub at utak fish is pen of the Erns Tow,'
tbe appeffaare pie jeerer ineas:lipwarZisaaiii
af▪
ter S tawasorestisese ben Lied Bresgbeem •
putisi ~sena* la the jabbeent all was
Fr:XLthe tartbas eveldiflnailes Weessaia
th P•111•00.4*IIDGOT or • UIIIIRAXD...
111•14•111411•••••daellY.
Thiele's an lOW NOMA debase( the dirt dividing of
the Court of Stubs In leNaad, Kadin that the man-
date, who is the wile of the appolhat, was entitled to a
demos or a wail tit thou frost him with ali-
mony, mooed to kb asses, of whisk he was by the de-
cree nquired to give la as iseesat. The quake Was
this—whether • Intsbastlibly refugia, to truism the marital
duties by Nang his wife ealy at meals, without
to her, by revealing her from vielang, or reseiZradtiliti
visits of friends and relative' and by Wigan, on her
• wise of insoles and indignitlis, but without whet or
pontos' sr ocessitting adultery. &a.,
Lbligentlatlytt soak conduct would, by the law of &attend,
entitle the wife to a separation and dismay. It appeared
that the parties were married in July, 1843, with math pre-
violas acquintease. The
_appellant, being is went
of mossy to set his Waite right, applied to Mi.
eSame% the father et the young lady, Sot pe-
lat., sad proposed for the datieheer at the
▪ s me. Beth peopOseb were seespted. Aber the mini-
age they mullet ahem, 'visited Load= and ether plasm,
and the went Is Odds at the appellant's house. The ree
spottiest sompleinal hem time to time to her Meads of the
coldness and sestestpt with which the appellant treated her.
H. himself, toe, wrote to her father and friends that he
sever had any &Subs for ku, that his life in her company
was one of deep mitictios, that she, without any fault of hot
own, mut be ever unhappy with him. In a
biter to her Mar the appellant wrote, " I re-
grit to say that without say dispentgerseat to the
aaturally good and kiwi disposition of your daughter, the
occurrences on our Jamey (to London) did set at all tend
to improve my hopes of Meridian; every hour, every Ind.
dent, every sesames uttered, loaded more and more to con-
vince me bow entirely unsuited we were to each ether. My
depression of spirits ontiesea, and I see sot the most
emote prospect °fatty amendment." In another part of the
same letter he admitted their unhappiness " is to be found
eulasively in my smanepterable &prude* of spirits, sad
unsequent neglect of these attentions which she has aa un-
doubted right to upset ben the male to whanehe has suited
herself, but which are se Meisel sow es they were previous
to our marriage." Is April, 1844, the respeadent left the
appellant's house, sad silerwaris, by the advise of her rela-
tives, brought an sales plea Ida be a dimes a menu et
there and he sulealie Amoy, the ground of action being •
souse of creel and najastishis eminent of her by the ape
pelisse, sash as to Bader bee life miserable and in danger.
She alleged is the ennunose that the appellant's whole con-
duct towards her wee inatimieed by a desire to szul her
he. Ms \sue. That he sever discharged the dut es of •
hothead he sad bum the first month site, saurisge he
coma Is Mkt say beerseues with her, aad though living in
the see blase be never spoke to tar ; that
in all hie Nods* be treated her is the most tontemptuoas
romnace, sad that he mum of the servants ; that he only
periled her in hie prima at breakfast sad disser, and
the be treated with disuse mid seatinapt ; ad as some as
the meal was over be retired to his teem ; that he ftquently
left haw hr weeks, leaving the t without he ae-
sesuries of life, se mosey to buy " to. The appel-
lant abstabed from
de
any explanation. in his
defence retie Mink haying part of the respond-
ent's abodes, but he that all her allegations, if
true, were eat sedirlut to entitle her to a decree of sopa-
ration and Amway, mod that nothing short of peneetal vio-
lence would nibs hr that purpose. The Lord Ordinary was
of that opinion tee, WO. that a libel at the instance of •
wife against her basibeimd. *Gaited on • series of insults and
indignities of to bar by him unaccompanied with per-
meal violence or mamas thereof was not sufficient, and he
dismissed the melee. Hie lordship added that were it not
for the view he took of some English precedents, he would
have greatly doubted the justice and pAicy of permittlag •
husband to wound and outrage the haling, of his wife by
every species of insult short of personal violence, and to per-
severe is his waded for ais kof time without redrew
when he had the means of bee a 'operate 'mint.-
nanft. From the Lewd Ordinary's t the respondent
appealed to the flue divides et the Caere of Session,
which after a long coons of pleading sad evidence also on
the part of the respondent is support of her allegations on
the Reties, deerua for the respondent that she might live
separately hem the appellant, and as to alimony ordered the
appellant to tarnish the court with an account of his means
and estate. The appeal was against that dories.
Mr. Holt wee heard for the appellant, contending that
nothing short of personal violence or • threat thereof, so ss
to put the wife an fess of her life, which was not alleged
here, would justify the court to decree for separation.
Dr. Harding was es the same side, but Lord Brougham
said he was Rua of the opinionurged by Mr. Holt, but he
would cell cet the ethic ado.
Mr. Turner and Mr. Anderson were then heard in sup-
port of the decree, contending that it was consistent with the
law of Scotland, as it certainly was with reason and justice.
The evidence showed a continued coulee of ill-usage which
no woman could bear. It was not personal violence or adul-
tery alone that entitled a wife to the protection of the court ;
a long Krim of unprovoked insults and indignities entitled
her to a separation.
Lord Brougham, admitting that there was gross miscon-
duct on the part of the appellant, was most clearly of opinion
that there was no sufficient ground laid for a divorce, cer-
tainly not, according to the law of England, and he believed
not even by the law of Scotland. However, he would bear
Dr. Harding on the point as te the law in our ecclesiastical
courts before he would move the judgment of the house.
Adjourned accordingly.
FIASIR O. LORD LOVAT.—ENTAIL.
There were two appeals between t 0... parties agaiust
decrees of the Scotch courts. One of them was argued in
February, 1949, and the second last week.
Lord Brougham now read a note from Lord Cottenham as
to the first appeal, and he agreed with that noble lord, and
moved that the appeal be dismissed. His lordship also
moo. d that the decree complained of in the second appeal
be affirmed.

--foiitde;ses was affirmed accordingly.
INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT.—YEErrutoaT

Bigroas Ma.

LAW.

Ix xi nuoi I;soLvaxciss.

This insolvent, a commission agent, made his third appear-
ance to be discharged under the art. He had been twice
before the court, cad owed considerable debts, which still
remained unpaid. He had in his present schedule nearly
thirty creditors, and owed about 6001_ There was no oppo-
sitka by his creditors to this hie third application.
Mr. Commissioner Lew told the applicant that his trade
was one of insolvency, and he thought the present applica-
tion should be diversified by a remand. His Honour ad-
judged hiss, under the diesremonary clause, to four calendar
months' imprisonment from the vesting order.

lha A essikataa Mu the
newer Kr. Hap
. atintatire rimers.
l'ota . *Aka has boss alma, do-
tavias Sett rolid oast; ant additional airflow
having Wes ohm,
Ik. Broderip said he should 'commit tho vision itsw-
H p nom the soosraLakorgas brought spinet Ist. H. ex
pr... 14 his opialsaApt did ass think the muds
lad lop mean W Mel solphiell at W sitnation is
ills, mei foam ; bit do orastlas was not whothar thoy
Italasald potitsatly projoerly, einsidotiso tilt Sossiisa,
hat wilodist dim eta stilialitis nits's, to *arrant
*Mit. Ile lbw& tame Miro wet, bat It woe so hr hoe
oweitedve tire be would seas two rendes 301. sash he
Ask apparanas at ths