The Express.
London, England, 1850-02-04 00:00:00

ilntelligence.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.--SsruaraY.
.11Arrniss £T Nw Pelee.—Barou Ma. JIMTKIII NAM
B (CLasK) s. ETANC-2311QVZOTILATION.
Mr. Whitaburee and Mr. G. Atkin on appeared for the
plaidtiff, aad SAS F. Thu* r sad Mr. Sesser for the de-
a tt.

This was en cars foe soaey bad sad rewind, bat Ia
fact to try the right to the sequestration of • Livia& The
defendant we the Earn of Chareh.liewahura, near
Evesham, a very smell patio, sad bad • yeer's Essen from
the Raw of Wonsan to reside oat of the polish is
anthem bat is 1148 reps one takes te marl
blue te made. He ettribia the grossed of the ither usw
Ahem of the hew i4l the parish. He did set
reside, gad the Mier pat faros the pennons of a wenn
act of pedismaal. 1 It 2 Vie., a 105, for enfordeg neldries.
It nodded that la every cue when it appeared hs the
that adamant ought to snide ia hislivi g, la was
Mine a araitisa ; sad if the clergy's** did sotaisr:
side es did set rase satirestery reason to the fir
ae2.......,.5es as hidsep mast the hen a need
the lunges* to go ism residthes h 1111
ilepsef did an, the set provided that the bishop
shield Juke ea for eartratiest,
whisk then was as seder
aril is the arch
By thisammestrthlea a perms was appeinin to moire
reale el the udder sad aria a mats. • provider was
also math, that where a perm went into residence nadir
the asentiea, bat did an freak fide reside for twelve
arathe. we we shun fa a swath, then a sermatatisa
ethedg hen; bat k wee aid swat that, if a penes essides-
sally shunted himself he drab% be subject to "erestrasism,
bat only If be did .3 wilfully. By another sethes of the act
it was provided that, if any benefice should sestisue under
sequeetration for twelve months, the Hein druid heseme
void sad vacant altogether. Oa sth November. WO, the
bishop bend a mond= ordering Mr. Bacaker to
reside or pat in hie newer ; sad on 15th December,
Mr. &sake west date residence. There was therefore as
sad ef Wt maitre. The plan Was damp and unhealthy,
sal hI Melly andemed at Brigham ; and the rake was
riled whether he had ant wilfully neatest Ursa Pre-
ssgangs were tabs, and eaBrd Feb., 1848, a ties
we kneed by the bishop to his secretary, Mr. Bess, the
deleadeskaad a ante was appointed. Matters rat ea Ma
a lbw ape men Yea a year, and there being a nabs of
the reseed' of the living, which Mr. Bomber wibi tro tie.•
calve, the Hasp, who was perfectly satisfied with Mr.
Bonaker's sandset, gave directions to hive it done, whoa
to his greid regret and astonishment he found that the

Aquestimian hiving continued for more than s year, it was
absolutely Welted. The bishop was anxious to raggedy this
inadvertent*, but there was no means of doing so, and the
patron of the living, Mr. Stapleton, who was himself a der.
gyman, insisted on his being inducted into the living. The
question, therefore, was whether the sequestration was cor-
rect, and, firstly, if the proceedings of the bishop were
regular • and as there was no notice of the that monition, if
that did not nullify theta ? It had been distinctly laid down
that this was so.

Before the conclusion of the address of the counsel for the
plaintiff it was suggested by the learned judge that the cue
being one of law, he should direct • verdict for the
defendant, and that a bill of exceptions should be tendered
to his ruling, which would raise toe question of law before •
court of error. This was 'greed to, bat it being thought ne-
cessary to prove the fact of Kr. Bunakar's wilfully absent-
ing himself from residence for a month.
Sir P. Tleesiger eoinnsenced to address the jury on this
point, and contended that he did not bona file reside in the
parish, but at his own residence at Greenhill, near Evesham,
only going to Church-lioneyburn to sleep on the Saturday
and Sunday nights.
Mr. Justice Erie, however, suggested that this evidence
was not necessary, and a verdict for the defendant was then
found under his direction.

COURT OF ERCHRQUER.-SATURDAY.
811TUK111 AT Mu Palm—Boon Bug F. POLLOCK, C. 8., AND
Cosmos Jvasas.

BOMAN V. FINTIIIB AND --..iDD.PNAD..MACTION AOAINGT
rlla Simairre OP MIDDIASSI.
Mr. Huafrey, Q C.. Mr. Lush, and Mr. Macauley were
counsel for the plaintiff; Mr. Martin, Q.C., Mr. Bramwell,
and Mr. Burchell, for the defendante.
This wee an sown against the late sheriffs of Middlesex,
for a fate return to a writ of Seri facial, issued at the plain-
tirs snit against one White, the landlord of • public house
in St. John-street, Clerkenwell. It appeared that White's
furniture, Ito* flatures,_ as., were valued at 3001.,
when the writ in question was placed in the de-
fendant's hands, on the 10th of March, 1849.
A large portion of the fund ups was claimed by White's
daughter under a bill of sale, and removed apes the 'tithe.
city of a judge's order after the sheriff's aillsers had entered
into poisession. The plaintiff's claim minuted to 801.. bat
in consequence of airier execution for 701. at the suit of one
Benjamin against White. and the seizure of a large portim
of the goods to pay the Queen's taxes, the levy to satisfy
Benjamin's judgment produced only 321. The defendants
therefore nturnsd "nulls bone to the writ issued at the
plaintiff's snit. It was now submitted if the defendants'
drawn had used due diligence, the property seised was
amply saltiest to satisfy both judgments and also pay the
taxes, which had priority of both. It appeared the plaintiff
had been afterward* paid by one of the parties to the bill of
exchange, upon which he proceeded against White as
soceAptortt.
er occupying nearly the whole day, the jury returned
• verdict for the defendants.