The Express.
London, England, 1850-06-13 00:00:00

mole worker mad modeller of editable shill sad eslebrity
in Oreekutrest. In the mental Of Marsh lot be went to
Paris, aad imaged the plaistiff,Auguate Gaillem, as a par-
mynas modeller and worker Per me year, at Ira Imam per
working day of ten hours, sad to pay year,
travelling expenses
to London. It wile, Indeed, stipulated that the defendeat
should retain 3 francs per week to cover the amOlint of the
travelling expenses; but the whole sum to be retained to
the phii.tiff at the end of the year's service. After the
plaintiff bad beau at work fee about throe weeks, the At-
tendant put an end to the egreement on the ground that the
other was eat competent to ammo the finer dentiptios of
work required to be dose. arid which, it wee aloud, was
included's the contrast. Subsequently, the defealeat pro-
posed to redoes the wages to 41. per day, aad have the qua*.
non of capability submitted to the arbitration of two piteous.
Tee plaintiff misted, oa media= that &mild the ilecklon
be is hie fancy he wee to reciive the worm of the original
contract. Bat, after some eonsideratios, the defendant
declined to give effect to the proposition sad the plaintiff
was absolutely &missed. It will as reeollected LLa: an
action between the same parties wee tried the week before
last is respect to the detection of the plaintirs tools, when
the jury found for the defendant on the ground that the
',labia' had (Iwo his employer a lien over them, is respect
of the advisee for travelling expenses. The case excited
considerable iaterest soonest foreign workmen, of
whom there were, French and German many in eourt;
but as the fasts were nearly similar to those stated in the
ease of Bartion v. Wertheimer tried on Friday, It is unneces-
sary to repeat them.
Maay witnesses were called on each aide. For the
plaintiff it was mearted that he was one of the most skilful
workmen of Path, and that any inferiority in his work was
to be attributed to the haste he was required to make. 00
the other hand, the defendant's wittiest's workers acd
deralers,said that the wwk was positively bait
Col. BoOd H.P. for Windsor, a patron of the art on an
extensive sink', gave evidence as to the isaufbiamy of the
worksamehlo. _ . .

Several specimens of the plaintiff'. chides( were produced
in court, Melodic, a stag, and two figures of Beesbus. The
allegations of inaufficieacy es r 'greeted the God of Wine,
11111* that in one figure the nasal promontory tem not suffi-
ciently developed is the other that it wanted fire in the
egos.
Theft's, found for theplaiciff ; damages 211. 16e.
This concluded the bummer of court for the Trinity tens.
SHERIFFS' COURT.—YrsTaRDAT.
Bascom R. Mitt; PAL
MARTIN e. 811..—LIAPILIT11.8 OP INNICIIII7I.III.
_

The plaintiff in this action if a oommercial traveller, de-
fendant is proprietes of the Cathedral Hotel, lit Patera-
churchyard.
It appeared by the evidence that plaintiff had for a long
tints frequented the house, and on the night is question
bed retired to bed leasing his watch, 10 sommiens. &c.,
on the table; but In the morning the property was missing.
Defendant called his porter to prove that a strict watch was
kept in the house, but that persons were let out without
inquiry. The loss having ken made known, information
wee given to the police, who succeeded in apprehending the
t►ief, who proved to be • returned cmvict, and was subse-
quently indicted for and convicted of that offence. Plain.
tiff contended that as an innkeeper defendant was responsible
for all property left in his care, and that although the pro-
perty in question was not de facto deposited with ►im, yet
the poseemion was implied by his employing a special porter
to watch.

The Learned Judas took this view of the cue, and gave
judgment for the full amount.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT.-YESTERDAT.

Prioax Va. CONIIIVIONCIL LAW.

IR RI JANIS 17/11DZITIICt 111;(71.11..-.11-RA. lITLES3 CA BE
OP SEDUCTION.

This isuiolvent, whose C;seappsared in out paper of
Thursday last, again came before the court. It will be re-
collected that the insolvent, a German journeyman tailor,
had seduced a young Welsh woman, named Sarah Jaws, a
servant, and had contrived to obtain from her 601 is
matey, as promise of marrisge. The case stood over fnr
the insolvent to produce the yaw g woman's watch, and for
other purposes.
Mr. Sturgeon again opposed for Sarah James, and pro.
dated a copy of her savings bank book, to show that she had
made advances from her earnings as a servant to the insol-
vent. Her watch was produced by the insolvent, but not a
gold seal, which she bed given him ; which he now stated he
bad, with other articles, pledged, sad disposed of the
duplicate. . . _

Mr. Commissioner Lew directed the watch to be handed
to the Toting woman, which was accordingly dose,
A I. renchman was examined to shoe, that he had pur-
chwed some pawnbroker's ticket• of the insolvent, and had
redeemed the articlea and resold them at a small loss. Amor g
the articles was a gold seal. It was also shown to the court
that the insolvent had paid come money for duty at the
Custom House, on goods tent from Germany, and which
money he had obtained from Sarah James.
His Honour expreved himself of opinion that the insol-
vent had cruelly used the young woman ; he had got her
money on the pretence that he was going to marry her. It
was for him to see what amends he could make. and with
the, view the ease had better stand over for six weeks.

The insolvent handed in a paper which he wished to be
read. It had been written by a fellow rriaoser. The pap. r
which was r-ad, expressed his regret for the injury he had
inflicted on Sarah James, whom he admitted he had pro-
miscd to marry. She had been ill, and having become as-
quainted with his present wife, and she being pregnant by
Lim, he had married her.
Yr.

Ltw observed that the insolvent, on his
formerly/ arks, denied the promise to marry, which he now
edatltted by the state meet he bad made, to Bush James.
The cam would stand adjourned to settle, and it the young
woman withdrew her opyo•ition, be might be discharged,
otherwise be would receive a judement.
The ease vu adjourned to the 24th July.

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT.
OLD COURT.—YESTERDAY.
B•rosi ML 'MICK PArreaos.
ASSAVLT CASII.

The grand jury have founia true bill against Captain
Montgomery I.ir an assault upon Mr. Bolt, in Hyggis ilk,
under circumstance.s which have already been published, and
able t have can ted considerable attention in the fashionable
world. It is rumoured, however, that no trial will take
plate, the parties having, it is understood, placed themselves in
the hands of Mr. Clarkson and Mr. B alkali, their respective
counsel, who are to say what each gentleman ought to do.

NEW COURT.—YESTERDAY.
nk-FOIS Tilt OrVIION SLILIFANT.
RnaB6RT BY A SOLICITOR.S CLERK.
Joseph Hall, erd 33, clerk, was indicted for stealing the
ma of 11., the property of Messer. Maraca and Pritchard,
hie neuters.

Mr. Overend prosecuted, and Mr. Charnock defended,
The facts of the case were these. The prosecutors are the
well known firm of solizitors, of Christchurch-chambeis. Pri-
soner was their oat door clerk, and to him was entrusted
monies to liquidate the current expenses of the office. In
the present instance he had debited the :firm the sum of
It. Is., paid with a subicens, having only pai I Is. with it.
Previously to this and other frauds Ming discoverei, the
prisoner left the prosecutors' employ without notice, except
sending a letter to state that he was going down into Wor-
cestershire to some friends.

In the course of moat examination it was elicited that the
managing articled clerk in the odic% was a delaaltet to a con-
Icrable amount and had absconded, and prisoner when
charged with the offence said he had been made the dupe of
him.

Mr. Charnock took an objection to the indictment, the
exact sum stolen not being specified, and quoted the recent
decision of the Queen v. Bond. _

The Common Serjeant held the objection to be good, and
directed tte acquittal of the prisoner.
He was again indicted and convicted of stealing a cheque
for 91.6 i. which had bees entrusted to him for the businees
of the dice. _ _

The jury and Om promoutor haviaa recommended bias to
mercy, be was material to is lantin' imprisonment.