The Express.
London, England, 1850-07-09 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, TUESDAY EVENING, JULY 9, 1850.

nook. sod the saki Lord Bishop of Bitter. Tao fees
necessary to be stated ter • deo trodentaading el the feal
are as know :—la the you 11147 Mr. Oaken was presented
by her Majesty to the lines of Brampfeed.flpeke, is the
dilletelle Barter. The bishop refused is admit Mr. Oor.
lam se the ironed that he entertaked *akin sat is
emordamos with the doctrines of the churn of laglasd.
Upon this refusal Mr. Graham instituted a proandisg by
darks ousels against the bishop is she sours of the Aroh-
Whop of Canterbury, eompisking of the decision of the
bishop, and &Hooks that be entertahied as &tonna lams-
natant with then of the church. Tho mato was board before
Sir Herbert Janitor Fast, Dean of the Arches, who diagnosed
the complaiste sad confirmed the decision of the bishop. Mr,
Gotham thee appealed from the Judgment of Sir Herbert
leaner Fast to her Majesty in soussil, sad the sass was by
her Majesty referred to the Jadleial Committee of the Privy
Council, by whom it was heard at gnat ksgth la the 'south
of February last, and in the month of Musk the Jellied
Committee reported in favour of the appeal, sad made •
reonameadation to her Majesty aseordiagly, spas whisk her
Majesty, as the 9th of Muck, inued an order in eintasil to
carry into effect the report and rocrommeadmion of the Judi.
vial Committee. The appeal to her Majesty in mune was
grounded on the statute tad and 3rd William IV., 0. 92,
wt kb abolished the Court of Delegates created by 26th
Henry V 111., e. 19, s. 4, sad enacted that all appeals whir&
might have boon made to that court should theneeforth be
made to the Him in council; and by the subsequent sit of
3rd and 4th William IV., 0. 41, L 3, all such appeals an
to be beard by the Judicial Committee. At the beginning
of last Beater Term the Bishop of Exeter applied to the
court of Queen's Bench for a prohibition to at any
farther proceedings on the order in cooacil made pur-
suant to the judgment of the Judicial Coaunituie, on the
ground that the matter in controversy was one which
touched the Queen as patron of the living, and that in a
cue touching the Queen there a was an appeal to the
delegates; and so neither would than now be an appeal to
her Majesty in council. The Court of Queen's Bench, after
taking some time to consider, unanimously refused to gnat a
role. The bishop then, later in the same term, made a si•
miler application to the Court of Common Pleas, and that
court, in the following term, by a unanimous
also refsa d to grant the rale applied for. The judgments
of both those courts proceeded on the ground that, even
supposing the matter to be one which touched the Queen,
still there was an appeal to her Majesty in council under
the statute 26th Henry VIII., a 19, altered by the nb•
quest statute of the 2nd and 3rd Willina IV., c. 92
The order therefore which had been made was legal red
valid, and so the bishop was not entitled to a rola.
bition. Late in the last term the bishop renewed his ap-
plication foe a prohibition by applying to this court, and
ander the Cifellolll4lllCtl of the ease the motion before as

being made at a time when it was imponible for us sells.
futorily to look into the authorities during the term, we
thought it best to grant a rule nisi, in order that the matter
might be discussed and disposed of at the present sittings
instead of bring left to staid over till Michaelmas term, as
it possibly might hue done, if we had taken time till alter
the last term to consider whether we ought or ought not
to grant a rule nisi. The rule basing been thus granted,
cause was shown against it oft the 29th ult. by the Attorney-
General, Mr, Greenwood, And Mr. Cowling, and on Monday
and Tuesday last Sir Fitzroy Kelly, Mr. Martin, Mr. Pea.
cock, and Mr. Baddeley were heard in support of the rule,
end the question now is whether the rule is to be made shoo!
lute or to be discharged. This involves two points:—l.
Whether this ie • case which touches the crown ; for, if it do
not touch the crown, it is admitted the appeal to the
Quen In council is well founded. 2. Whether
in all cams (touching or set touching the crowns
I there is an appeal from the Archbishop's Court to the
Queen in council t If there be, then also the appeal to
her Majesty in council is authorised by law, and this rule
cannot be made absolute. In the Courts of Queen's Bench
and Common Pleas the judgment was founded entirely on
t e second point—we directed the attention of counsel to
the first point alio, entertaining u we then did. and still do,
considerable doubt whether the matter touches the crown

or net; but we have thought it naneesseary to decide this
pantos we are clearly of opinion that whether a ease of
duplex guerilla before the archbishop be one which touches
the crown or not, there was an appeal given by the 2.5 th
Henry VIII , e. 19, to the King in Chancery ; and, there-
fore, now there is an appeal to the Qeeen in council. Ws
have arrived at this conclusion by considering what is the
combined effect of the two statutes-24•h Henry VIII., c. 12,
and 25th Henry VIII., e. 19, by which last statute the
authority of the Court of Delegates in these matters was
first created. For the Judicial Committee, without any
doubt, have been substituted for the Court of Delegates,
sad have (at the lust) the same juriedic.ion. We,
will, therefore, begin with the 24th Henry VIII., a 12.
By that Act, restraining appeals to Rome in suits testamen-
tary, matrimonial, and for tithes, there is first a general
prohibition to all person., subjects of this realm or resiaau,
to appeal to Rome under penalty of a prthenunire, and then
a provision by the sth section that where the King's sub.
jeep, or rebuts within the King's dominions, bad before
used to appeal to Rome concerning the three causes before-
usationed, they (i. a., the King's subjects or • is) should
MP:lwithin the realm of England and not elsewhere, is
imner sod form thereinafter pointed out and not otlieur-
whim The act then proceeds to describe four chases of cases :
I. Causes coming before the bishops' archdeacons, which
unto be pursued through the Bishop's Court, and so to the
Aselibiskop'sCourt,tbere to be de fin Sleety and finally ordered,
decreed, and adjudged, without any appellation or metha-
don to any other person or persons, court or courts; 2d.
Causes commenced before the bishops which go to the Arch-
bie.op's Curt in precisely the same terms as to finality.
3d. Suits commenced before the archdeacon of the arch-
bishop, which, after going flr-t through the Court of Arches,
are to go before the archbishop himself, obviously refer-
ring to the court (now obsolete and absorbed in the Court
of Arches) formerly held before the archbishop in person,
assisted, as he generally was, by assessors. But this
class of cams also, when arrived at this point, was to be de-
finitively and finally determined without soy other or further
proems or appeal to be therefrom bad or sued. The fourth
clam of cases was those of suits commencing (as this present
ease did) before the archbishop himself, which were to be de.
fioitively determined by him without any other appeal, provo-
cation, or any other foreign proem out of this realm, to be
used to the let or derogation of the said judgment, sentence, or
decree, otherwise than by this act was limited and appointed.
This, hen was the state of the law : by express words, th..
deeisio• of all these appeals by subjects or miens) grieved
might be winnowed in various courts, but in all of them
the decision of the c nut of the archbishop was to be final,
otherwise than was by that a-t limited sod appointed; and
the words were general and clearly extended (if the act had,
bat for the proviso, stopped here) to all suits, whether such
as touched the King or such as did not. But then came
the 9th section, as a sort of proviso or qualification of
them all. That clause enacted that, in suits touching the
king, ventilate, commenced, or begun in any of the said
courts fi.e. Bishops' or Archbishops'. Archdeacons' orß Shops',
or Archbishops' Courts), the final appeal should be to the
" Spiritual Prelates, Abbots, and Priors of the Upper House
of Convocation of the respective provinces where the suit
began, and that what matter there should be determined,
appertaining, concerning, or belonging to the King, his
heirs or successors, should stand and be taken for a final
decree, and the same nutter never to come in question end
debate to be examined in any other court " The true mean-
ing of this is clearly, we think, to repeal the finality as to
decisions in the Archbishops' Courts, in cases which touched
the King, leaving it is ell other cues. Then came the 25th
Henry VIII, c. 19, by which that which had been before
confined to three classes of ecclesiastical cuts was 'shaded
to all. This was done, we think, by the conjoint operation
of the two sections, the 3rd and 4th (which it may be well to
observe form in the old black-letter editions of the statute
only one h). It would clearly be incorrect to say
that the woe& of the 3rd section, is their strict literal mean.
lag, can be construed so an to give effect to the obvious
intention of the legislature. For this would be to make the
legislature enact, first—that all thee* eases should be finally
determined without any appeal from the Archbishops'
Court; and then, by the 4th section, alter that provision
by giving a further appeal to the Court of Delegates. It
ie we think clearly more simple and more reasonable to
say that the two sections taken together mean, that the pro-
vitions as to the form and manner of appeals given in the
24th Henry_ VIII.. e. 12, and amended by the 4.h section of
the 25th Henry VIII., e. 19. shall extend to the three
claims is the 24th Henry VIII et. 12, and all other rode.
siastical appeals whatsoever ; and if we do this, the natural
mode of the sections in order will be to superadd to
the • to the Archbishop's Court a new court of appeal,
repealing the finality of that court, and substitudag
In has place the finality of the new oottrt (viz., the Court of
Delegates), and the declaration that there shall be no further
=he them. Now, had the 24th Henry VIII. Ism so
is is dear that the Court of Delegates would have
heft tho di-Y- dud el appeal, provided by the 6th, 7th„
awl this assess' of that act. The words of the three
widths wan and applicable both to caned
tenablog or the King. The words of
Me edam as to dm of Delegates are general
dm. The Arelldellgsts pond was by these sections mad*
lisaL Ilse Cast of Delegatee is la like manner made deal.
Tisaj=iitite 9th section altered the finality as to
Me Othrts, but confined that finality to matted
net treemblog King. It Is obvious that a similar tile*
=ens elves to the words which render final the de-
af the ONO of Delegates. Indeed, it was admitted
Odle Ms. end mold set be denied, that this order of the
molionseendlethil the cad free feed all doubt, and that the
swedes_ (it wen the
soil
Teel
would clearly be, that is
am the Hinted:en would be from the Apia.
Overt to the
.. And after maw-
die v.:2, WO alaraniteoion that, nem&
111111 • MD Of th• statutes. theassetheeM
appeal Is all oeseo (whither they touched the Lisi at set)
Ism thedzelstlafeep Octet to thetwo
Quell fa C
illeadive,thet thorium his appeal to the QcseillaulamiLi m 4
This cells mien to be the result of the sees aim{ of
ice smeasi Wed. Is sheath " last ," p. 337. Leda*,
sew (al Ms (kart of Arabes), "Frets this overt the =)
icu. is Rles is Chesesry, by the maid set of 2drk 1
t 619 (making so mends. of 111) 'mails Is Ilst
therein). A_OLO, fa that put w pub et 1
Detentes. Ist Ins ha sago: Thus Thus dikobse ile
isreeei 16 twee ammiiiime k thins auk :—let.
a esteem le gives ils seep sewby the
aher or hie oasis'," (!rta
_. 10 maws am
i oaf, isslifelft_l7 ZVI! ..F. 110, belays
sklaftedig aPonaq 0 h um, amoral

rases denall miaow. of *Nub (what matter oesrathey
eassegra) shall lo aids la rah maamev foom, sad radition
widths lihe realm as it is above ~dared by 24 Hoary
in the thus canes afrasaidy and me further degree in
appeals for all manner of fawn Is gnu, vie.—fronl the
Archbishop's Coen to the Kiag la Chasesey." 80,
"Comyn's Digest," tit. Preeresetive (D 14), after mating
out the ratios of the 25 Heary-VIIL, s• 19, preseeds thus:
—"And ramie, is all meiselenteal mums as aappppeeal vies
to the delgialsh." Bleelmeass• ;Masa of all the esitities.
says "TM ',peal (whim tbs Woe bkorelf lea piety) dose
set lie to the Kies In ChaMilly, whisk would be absurd ;
had by IM *MU IL ismVIII., s. 12, le all the
=fa She Neu in the Upper Kora Cow
" klesearate mamma in which the rains is
rest:ikterallevile drag grant Per Mabting the sesehmies se
, and ue think the authority of Lard Cake GM of
Chia( Bores Osumi Y set outweighed by this see rases to
Bleskraney Weed, HIM pemegeb taken to lie WM, It
eosins the appeal to the Conesaden to thermoses falai&
the King himself is • party, sod it is quits Our that her
Majesty is not • party teens@ Funding', and so it would
he no authority be this nes at all. The Courts of Queen's
Bench and Cosmos Plus eon to the seouraelea that the
appeal to the Cestramtko was altogether abolished by the
effect of the tad etatap. They both thought that whew, by
the express provisions of see. 4 In the 25th Henry
19, a new appeal was given 5 ell parties graved, with-
out any exceptios, sad a sew *tiniest was nastitutel for
the purpose, and no farther appeal was to be bad or made
host the sane : this was in sleet a repeal of the ex
right of appeal gives by the 24th Henry ~,,,r t a litt
particular came of molten leeching the crown—and in
support of this view of the case reliance was placed on the
fact that no appeal to Convocation ever has takes place
during the three notaries and upwards which have elapsed
since the passing of then statutes; and, ma Use other head,
it wee shown that in Nunl ewe sines the rugs of Henry
VIII. (certainly in five, perhaps Ia more), In which the hire
was concerned, en appeal has been made to the delegate., with-
out objection. The conclusion at whisk the Courts of Queen's
Bench and Common Pleas have arrived seems to us so Tema-
able a coastruetion of the statutes, ezplathed as they are by
alinement usage, and contradicted by no contrary practice,
that but for the authority of Lord Coke, followed by a great
number of other text writers of eminence, we should at once
have adopted it. We feel, however, that the authority of
Lord Coke Is not to be lightly disregarded, and certainly in
the 4th Inst. he speaks of the Court of Convocation sea court
to which there was as sepia], under the statutes in question,
In eases touching the king. This is expressly stated under
the head of Court of Convocation, in p. 323, and again under
the head of Appeals, I. p. 339. It is true, that in the latter
passage Lord Coke is not speaking from his owa mind, but is
oily giving the report of Lord Dyer. But we think it must
be inferred, that he meant to adopt as good law what he so
states himself to have received from Lord Dyer. What Lord
C. ke the@ states, namely, that in matters which touch the
King, there is an appeal to the Upper Hone of Convocatlen,
has been adopted by a great number of writers cgs the highest
eminence, including Lord Chief Baron Comm, Ayliffe in
his Parergon, and ethers. These subsequent authorities, it
was said, do not add anything to the weight of the original
authority of Lord Coke, final whom teey obviously took
their law, nor do they, save only that their adoption of what
had been hid down by Lord Coke proves that they did not
doubt its accuracy. It was indeed a matter of little or no
practical importance, and in all probability they adopts d
Lord Coke's authority without much, or perhaps any inves-
tigation. Still the result of the whole is, that Lord Coke
writing long after the reign of Hoary VIII , says there
is in matters touching the Kirg en appeal to the Convo-
cation, and many intraquent text wrier. of great
eminence, down to very modern times, assert the
same. In the reran cue, this is rather matter of
curious speculation than of any practical importance, for
in either view of the ease the proceedings before the
Judicial Committee were well founded, and in either view
of the ease there can now he no further appeal. If the
2nd statute, 25th Henry VIII., c. 19, repealed the 9th
section of the former statute, the proceedings questioned by
the present application are perfectly regular. So if the
god statute merely gave a further appeal in all eases to the
delegate', ninny the proceedings before the Judicial Com-
mittee now questioned are regular, and there can now be no
further appeal of any sort, as the 3rd section of the 2nd and
3rd William IV., c. 92. exprenly makes the judgment, order,
or decree under that statute final and definitive. If we were
compelled to decide this question we should probably come
to the same conclusion as the other Courts of Westminster-
hall—vim., that in effect the statute 25 Henry VII 1., e. 19,
did repeal the clause in the 24th Henry VIII., e. 12, 1440011
9, which in cause touching the crown gave an appeal to the
Convocation. Then is on the one hand whet appears to us
to be a reasonable contraction of the statute, supported by
all the practice that is known to exist on the subject and op•
posed by none. On the other hand there is the authority of
Lord Coke and the text writers that some appeal did exist
to the Prelates of the Upper House in causes touching the
king; but, as we have observed, this is now practically of
no importance. The question before us is not whether there
was after the puling of 2.5 Henry VIII., c. 19, some
appeal to the Convocation in some stage of causes touching
the king, but whether in all manner of (ecclesiastical) causes
there was an appeal from the Archbishop's Court to the
King in Chancery, and we think there was, and that, there
fore. there now is to the Queen in Couacil. Our judgment
is founded on what we hold to be the true censtruction of
the act, and on the eminent authorities already referred to,
which it has been incorrectly stated lead to a contrary con-
,' elusion. The view we have taken may be fortified by some
matters presented to us in the course of the argument.
The section of 25 Henry VIII., c. 19, which gives the
appeal to the delegates, expressly says, a commission
shall be directed like as in case of appeal from the
Admiral's Court. Now, it is well known, that the appeal
from the Court of Admiralty to the delegates has always
been of all manner of isauses, whether touching the crown
or not. It was further noticed that in the Irish Statute,
28th Henry VIII., cap. G, following the course (very gene-
rally adopted) of assimilating the law of Ireland to the law
of England, the appeal to Rome is taken away, and an
appeal given precisely secording to the construction of the
English Statutee adopted by the Courts of Queen's Bench
and Common Pleas. It is true there may not have been
a Convocation in Ireland similar in all respects to what
existed in this country, but there certainly was a Convo-
cation, and, undoubtedly, (there were " Spiritual Pre.
lane," to whom the sipped might have been given, if it
were anessory (as it was generally thought to be) to
assimilate the practice in Iceland with the practice in
England, and if, in fact, there was an appeal in England
to the Spiritual Prelates in the Convocation being.
Lastly, we may remark that the Statute 25th Henry VIII.,
e. 19, by giving the appeals in all causes ecclesiastical
from the Archdeacon to the BA( p or Ordinary, and from
him to tho Metropolitan or Archbishop, and from him to
the King, and no further (if such was the effect of
the statute), did but restore the ancient law of the 14nd, as
settled (on this point) by the constitutions of Clarendon in
the reign of Henry 11., Assno Domini 1164 The constitu-
tions of Clarendon were directed against the enroachments
of ecclesiastical power and the usurpation of the Papal autho-
rity, and, next to the great Charter itself, they hate been
always considered es a security for the independence of the
kingdom and the liberty of its subjects. These last observa-
tions would not of themselees be sufficient to support our
decision, but they add stronelli and reason to the authorities
we have cited, and they illustrate the construction of the
statutes which we have felt ourselves bound to adopt. Oa
the whole, therefore, entertaining, as we do, no doubt upon
the question before as, and concurring with the other courts
of Westminster-ball, and, as far as we know, with every
judge of all the courts, we do not think that we should be
justified in creating the delay and expense of further pro
ratlines with • view to take the opinion of the House
of Lords, and our judgment is that the rule be discharged,
with eons.
Nra

61a P. Poubri, C. 8., AND ♦ LOImoN SPICIAL
JOLT.

RICH•RDS AND ANOT-1;11 O. OLIDATANAB.

This case was resumed at 11 o'clock this morning, but it
was not concluded at 6 o'clock. Wan the coon was adjourned
to this morning at 10 o'clock.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT.-YESTERDAY,

Bayou NIA COMUSSIONIUL PonAim
IN RI 0101101 L. MILLAIID.-TNN xzw POSTAL
ARILANONISINTS. .

Mr. Cooke applied to tbe;;;;;lrr7iis assistance in a mat-
ter which had arisen in consequence of the new postal
arrangements. The insolvent, who had resided in Pun-
briki shire, had only one creditor, who lived in London. It
was necessary to advertise the day of hearing in a Welsh
newspaper, and proper steps were taken. An advertisement
wu left in due time with Munn Barker, the London egen•s,
but waa not inserted in a piper of lut Saturday because it
had not reached the office in Wales in sufficient time, the news •
papers published on Saturday beicg obliged, in coseequeuce of
the postal arrangements, to go to press 24 hours earlier
than usual. The learned e:unsel geld this was one of the
many inconveniences which had occurred, and no advertise-
ment of the hearing had been inserted. Ms, however, hoped
the court would deem an advertisement inserted on Saturday
next for the hearing on the 18th inst. as sufficient.
Mr. Commissioner Phillips, under the peculiar circum-
stances of the use, granted the application. He would allow
an advertisement on Saturday next to be considered sufil-
cleat, although less than the usual period required.

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT.
NEW COURT.—YESTERDAT.
BOOM Mt COMMON SWLtNT.
In the course of the morning, upon the &rambling and
swearing is the petty jury in this court, two of the parties
so summoned al aiming exemption on the grounu of age, the
Common Berland tea the opportunity of informing these
that they should have given notion of that fact to the
churchwarden, overseen, and vestry clerks of their ropes-
otive parishes, and they *add not have been returned on
the jury list to the Wheels of this court, and thereby saved
the trouble of being mimmesed.
Kr. Clark said that this being near the period when the
lists of Jurors were nude up by the parishes, those
parties wishing to claim their exemption ought at ones is
give ma=

IV 001

MARKETS.

COTTON —LsvaspooL, JULY B.—The smart'
waleadingly stit4 and priest elated with a bard/Wag
13.000 bass were ruld,,ialuaing 7,000 taken tar ipmmigibit rd
apart

JL.—Erniso Vaia.—Thia fair wee heti ea Friday.
=.lod, eerlef le • Rod agree to the rte ingemomat
there was • IT
tar or mowers, ati a
et Mem steed am kr tear yews pot. The were
lw lewd the belle bandies' la the et the litleind Mem
The maim et deems eiterwe te4 mil amity Ms
of this wes tbo tulinm pine gives lid. kr teg, asd
tsr ewe Week es whom et Meet IIL per apes Ow rake of the
Mt kir. • reel; se we maereeri. are M he MUM MA I. the
demand dr the beet Meirletiren 61 Lydia Weal b the Theta thee
heat the rover oetivitg et ear own annutturem. The only
torgerseerm INNS Mr. Watt es mieett et Mr. Orem at Harlow
Mr. es the regreeentetive of Mena Mite mid Man el Cluelos.
Ibrd; feyM et liendord; hut the Wow gruthmes did sot
mud the flue leca ems beim trusereted.

CORN.—Butm, July 6.—Oar mark. ts ars from Is. to 2a.
per v. IsMbar ke
lest Wheat; sad other issoriptioas of grain are arse, at
west's goolitkos.
ClitSlloll4l.lll, lay 8. —Wo bass a Rood &naiad for
Wheat, which le held firmly be higher prises; Wood this article is
ito is. per qr. dome the csi this d.y Barley, Oats,
ans. d Bows tomb
101. stssily, at how quotation. Wheat. 91. 10s. to
per rtilot& Perim 2/ss mita pee v. Oats. 175.t0 Ws. B. saa,
m
RA9)111014 July B.—Wa bad a moderate supply of earn
today, though but little beside Wheat, sad that was taken etlelly by
the milers, at alma bet woek's priers. Very little spying, which said
tally as dear.

lkiakTroaD, Jaly 6.—The supply al Wheat fair; fee ISM •
plea made rather stote ease" h a the early pat at the marls; but
eland dull at tot work's priced In other dreartpUsse of Own bet
tittle boats= dolma; Isst west's priers supported. Wheat, frost
2V. r load. balmy, M. to Vs. par qr. Oats, 13a. to ll'.
per qr. Yeas, Vs. to 30‘. pet bad. Beaus, l7s. to 21a. Ursa Lb.
to 14e.

Li:moult, July 6.—There was a moderato supply of
Wheat at our risarket, with • brisk demand, at rally La. week's
prla•. Scarcely anything dolag in opting tkero. Wheat, red, .9a.
to 42a.; wkite, Maw 4la. barley, 2m. to 29e. OMB, 13e. to 21•.
Dams, 235. to SOL per qr.

PIiTWORTH, July S.—There was more inquiry for Wheat
at our market on Saturday, and the supply was cleared of at full rates.
Prices of utoer grain were the.. Wheat, white, 101. 10s. to 111. Se.
per lead: red, W. las. to lot. Barley, grinding, Y9s. to 245. per qr.
UAW, 17a. to las. Yeas, Pls. t i ate. beans, toe, to 112 a.
IitADING July 6.—There was slight in.:male in the
Ripply of Wheat at this day'. market, and the weather being very
unfAvonrable for the growing crops, together with a firmer tone in
the trade ou Mark-tooe, out millers bought with more confidence than
for some weeks past, and readily gave au advance of Is. per qr.; bat
as many held for a greater improvement, some quantity to put by for
another motet. Oats were is. per qr. imam. In other grain there
was no seriatim.

811P7KON WAZDIN, July B.—Wheat rather scarce, main-
taining tie former puce, 14s. to 425. per qr. Miter, best, 2ts. 6d. to
RM. 6d.; grinding, 17s. to its. BMW, 21s. to en. Peas, Vs. to
ills. Oats lb. to les. 6d.

CATTLE, dte. —CoLcuasTan, July 6.—There was an
abundant show of every description of stork at market to.day, bat
buyers coetinuing wane, the trade in •hecp was extremely dull to
the clime, a very limited portion being disposed of, although prima
declined full 3 per cent, to induce sake. lade appeared to be an
evident lack of the "etreulaling medium." Good Mich Cows fetched
high prices, but the greater pat of those cohabited were of an cient-
e dry chsraeter. There were not so many fat Besets as of late, but
the demand being very slack, no improvement in prices mild be
effected. Lees steak was scarcely inquired after. The Pig trade re-
mains to the arms stagnant state in tur several weeks past. tsupp:y :
Itbeep and Lambs, Mtn; Beasts, 3413; raga, 2i3; Calves, 39;
Horses and Pada% 147.

•
LIvngPOOL, JULY B.—Tha &apply of stock at market wu
much lea' than on last Monday , a good demand for each, at much
better price'. Beef, from 41d. to 5.d. per lb. ; mutton, from sd. to
at
30. per lb.
t. ; lamb, bid. per lb. 1,431 utile, 9,3,/b sheep and lambs
marke

Nouwicu July 6.—We have to report a very large show
of SCOCI, tho(11011111, and Llerons • the numbers were far more than
equal to tLe demand. At the Miss of the day fully hdf remoned
unsold. Saga, is. to 3a. 6d ; short-horns, and Dermas, fa. id. to as. p r
atone of labs., when tat Fat Ile auks, • small show, and trade good, at
6s to 6s. 6d. per stone. The pens were well Lied; Lambs are • mad
sale, at Os. to Ida. for useful descriptions ; pnrne, lee. to the per
head ; naked tbeep, from 2.a. to Jo*. Der head, amarding to Mae and
couthuon. Fat blimp, from 6e. to 6s..tsl. per stone. Goad store Figs
snot fat Fork, no alten.uon.

HOP INTELLIGENCE.
MAIDSTOIII.—Au extensive end careful examination of
the phintatloos maths us to say that the Isms are still going on most
favourably. The bine is strong and vigorous and grows rapidly—
enemies it baa none. The few fly which appeared ten days no have
vanished; the has do not propagate; is short, everything seems In
favour of the plant. Even the lute pies and stories have left them
for the mo‘t part unacathcd. rim state of things seems general
thrrogbout this idstrict.
FattLlloll Ant BAIMINGI.—B no growing feat —no
vermin.

WacrrxAx.—We an slack of bine in places, but in other
reerrets rang on Well._

Winnings...N.—Oar accounts me uniformly good. No
vermin. _ _ _

IittNTON, July 3.—The begs Dave hitherto been growing
vigorously. The wind however. is now handling them pretty roughly.
The hale is generally in a sufficiently forward vtate,tnough we nave
occasional slack pines.
STAPLEH Cart—The bine ts bruised by the high winds,
but 11.. s grown rapidly, and la cal free from vermin.
. . . .

itothsosti, July 6.—Our hops hatheno have been very
growing eaters in the grounds that were injured by the wet and blight
last year, where they arc very uneven. The late winds have biown ott
a great number of the beads and branches, which must lower the duty
to all appearance at least 10,C4M.
CAN rithlitatlf.—The weather this week has been tie favour.
able for the young hops, the wind blowing them abaut, bruising the
bine, and wuipping it • little. The mould has been ruble at places,
but we do not perceive shy increase of vermin. General amounts
speak of the plant going on promisingly.— Maidstone Journal,
MhazIVORTH AND WEST MALLINTS—The hops in these
parishes have not made the progress that might have been expected
during the past week. The late rates and cold woods seem to ?start.
their growth. 01•1111 to the ...Winne of the bin,' the crop can be by
mesas heavy. 80010 gardens will not grow one-third of a crop.
TISTON AND WATiItINOBVItT.—The hops lock well and
grow rapidly, There me few pieces of slack bine; yet their being so
tree from vermin is more than a balance for that deficiency.
We cannot speak well of the hops in this
parish. Although there are sane good grounds, yet there are several
slack of bine, and toe mould is greatly en the increase.

YALDI3IO.—Our hos generally are getting on well, and
in a growing state. The late high winds have mimed some work is
replacing the Dines, but Mire not preyed very injurious. In e.me
grounds the mould has made appearance.
Wkb r hILLLINO.-7he hope are still looking healthy, but
we doubt whether the north winds will not cause a different tale to
he told in another week.

liOLLlNollirUtitt—The hops continue to look well.
HADLOW. —The hops are doing well, and are free from
vermin. They are considered rather backward for the time of year.
Cllitllltllool.—The bine has been mach lashed by the
boisterous winds, but it is the opinion of the growers that nei ruats
fist injury hes es yet been done, The plant looks green and howl... Witt.
HuneMONDIN.—The late high winos have somewhat
damaged the blase In some grounds, but not, we hope, to any serious
extent; generally, they are looking very well, end ate write tree
frees iv.
consequence of the boisterous wind for
two or three days, the bine ban bei n bettered in exposed eituatlotu%
but • week's favourable weather will make it impercertible to the
view no vermin of any description to be scene

1 zerritunxte.—Tne hope continue exceedingly well. The
bine grows space, and has, in many places, muck overtopped the
poles
FARNHAM, ALTON, AND COCNTRY DISTRICTS, July S.—
Our hop plantaUcas are pregrneing favourably.—.Voidinse Gazette,
of July S.