The Express.
London, England, 1850-05-02 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

SOUSE OF COMMONB.—WaroxiADAT, MAT I.
Iks Srkozas took lb. akar at 12 o'clock.
PRIVATE BUSINESS.
Ammonium; CONSIDIIIID.-80ath dtaffordslio Rail-
wig Bill.
TRW)
DilL

Hospital Improvement
PUBLIC BUSINESS.
THE MILITARY KNIGHTS OF WINDSOR.
Col. SALWZY gave notice that, on FINDS OR, ls
mead move for of
of the ems voted by parliament
*r the sesosumodation of the military heights of Windier.
ZZOISTRARSHIP OF THE DIOCESAN COURT OF
CANTERBURY.
Sit B. HALL said that in relation to s Tallies 1.2 Its
Is the soap lord at the heed a her Mejesty's
sommaing the registrarship of Cuts:bay, he vilaieff le
make a few oteeratione. It would be In the resellsollesa
the home that he had asked the sable lord a qemilissi
Nis Week whether the appointmest of a registrar for Cm
Whiny had been filled up, and if so, whether bad hew
Sled up by the Archbishop of Canterbury
flagnomin
ate
his
own son or the son of the Bi.hop of Winchester to t
tees ? Ile believed that that was the exact quail= widish
he pat, sad that the answer given by the noble lord veer that
the Archbishop of Callable, had filled up the weasel
a who wea
with the name of his own son,, pang eras seedy-
hag et the Temple. It appeared, however, from some of
those channels of comemileation that ge firth to the public
that he aided to know from the noble lord whether it
had been filled up by Mr. Smarr, the sou of the Bishop
et Winchester, sad that the answer of the sago lord was
Is the affirmative, whereas the noble lord used that the
Archbishop of Canterbury had filled it up by SIM semi of
hie own eon. [The report ie the Evros was verisairis
of literati's in soconlance with the hon. baronet's preeeat
esplanades.]
METROPOLITAN INTERMENTS BILL.
Tamara to Sir B. HALL.
Sir G. GREY said that this bill would respire some con-
sideration, and that he would not wish to proceed with it on
rehlay neat.
LAWS OF SETTLEMENT. OF REMOVAL, AND
RELIEF OF THE POOR.
Mr. Alderman SIDNEY asked the Presided of the Poor.
law Board the following weirdoes :—Whether it be the
intention of her blepsty's government to propose any
11106611641 founded on the recommendations ammined in the
reports to the poor-law board_,_'' on the lees of settlement
and removal ot the poor ?" Whether it be the intention of
government to introduce any bill for the more (qua distri-
bution of the char" for the maintenance and redef of the
poor ? Whether, in the event of no suck general measure
g introduced, it is their intention to propose such a
meows rehash' to the Woes of the City of London, with-
Is whisk the int quality more particularly pry 5.4
Kr. BAINES said that, in reference toile questions put to
the hoe. gentleman, he begged to state that the sub.
Jests the settlement and the chargeability of the poor had
occupied the attention of the Poor-law Board for many
months, and were stilt under their consideration, and that they
were questions of great difficulty, to which muck attention
should be directed before any opinion could be given. As to
the facts stated in the reports, the board thought that it
wee their duty to bring the subject under the consideration
of pediment at the ear:int period in their power; but
the 'tab of public, badness precluded the possibility of
their being able to do so daring the present erosion.
They hope-I, however, to be able to do so at as earl
period la the next. As to the hon. gentlemea's
quotas he would remark that as settlement and &WWI.
a3ißt were 63 closely emulated he did not propose to bring
forward any measure on the separate subject of chaneabi-
lity, though he would oak the -house to renew the Union
Ast. As to the third question, he did not think
CHttlirwaski be pester for the Poor-law Board to introduce
any potholer seellere for the City of London, and when
ear the subject should be introduced to parliament he
ld
shou prop that it be dealt with aserelly.
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES BILL.
In reply to Load Dorcas,
Sir J. DUCKWORTH said that he would go os this
day with the mend reading of the bill, as he fat that, in
that stage of it, so objection could be taken.
BIRTH OF A PRINCE ROYAL OF ENGLAND.
Sir G. GREY said that before the orders of toe day
should boned he might be allowed in the absence of his noble
friend the first lord of the treasury to make a motion which
after the happy event that had taken place that day, he
wee wan woad meet with the cordial and unanimous con-
ennence of the house. He felt that the house woad he
seams to take the earliest oppoetuaity of riposting upon
this seesaw the deep ink rest that it felt in everything that
related to the domestic happiness of a sovereign whose public
aid private virtues had every day rendered her more and
mere an object of affectionsto attachment to the people of
We assay. (Hear hear.) He would therefore propose
that on \amble adtlises be presented to her Majesty, con-
putulatiag her at the birth of another prince. and assuring
her that every addition to her domestic happintst afforded
the most heartfelt 'Mead°a to her faithful commons.
(Hardsear.)
Sir R. H. INGLIS said be bad great satisfaction in se-
conding the motion, and stated that every year that her
Majesty had reigeed, from the lint, moment of her socessien
to the throne, had gives her new claims to the gratitude
and affection of the people ; and every child with which
God had blessed her had furnished new motives to all per-
sons to hope for the continuance of that favour which bad
watched over sad guarded the prosperity end happiness of
the people. (Hoar, tear.)
Motion agreed to unanimously. with cheers.
LANDLORD AND TENANT BILL.

Mr. PUSSY moved the second reading of this bill.
Mr. CHRISTOPHER objected to the principle of the
Cpl, whisk wild sense an undue interference between land-
lord and semi It would be much better that they should
allow the landlord and tenant to arrange their own
matters amongst themselves. He would, in the absence of
his hon. friend, move an amendment that the bill be read a
mooed time that day six maths.
Sir G. STRICKLAND seconded the motion, and pro-
bated against such an unjust interference with the rights
of property, which would destroy the freedom which every
person ought to poises. of managing his own private sire
as he thought best. It had been stated that this bill was •
paraissive bid, but it was no suck thing; it gave no power
whisk did net exist before. He had another strong objection
to the bill, as it had the tendency to promulgate bad systems
of agriculture. It recommended marling, which was found
b many places very injurious to land. It was provided la
this bill that if • tenant built, whatever might be the wire
of the building—however bad, inappreptisou gg assuming
ft may be—the landlord was to pay tr the moilles or lb)
tenant is to be allowed to take away the gastedi of
which it was compzed. That he ingnibred to be
a most dangerous ple.
Lord GALWAY said he would vote for the anteedment,
as ke felt the bill would produce strong ill feeling between
landlord and tenant.
Mr. AGLIONBY supported the bill, though. perhaps,
ems alteration would be fouad necessary to be made is eon-
asides.
Mr. PACKS sold that, although he felt that gingillashie
alterations were esseaseey in the bill, still, being aim of
the many hardships arking to the is* be. cheese of
ownership under the pees* state of the law, heti
to support the mid readies. He *sight that mit of
hardship of this kimi befog frequent, W=in INS wag
worthy the attention of the Mese. (newt,)
Colonel SIBTHORP having apologised be laid umavoida-
hie abseil at an earlier period of the day, desired his inten-
tion of decidedly appeals; this bilL It was sailed • bill for
improving the rheum' between landlord and imant, but in
his opinion it would ham quite a contrary ells* Tim re.
lations wanted no improvement. (A laugh.)
salted all the mast exteive lad spate In pi of the
oguntry, and all concurred is alibi that ea alteration wee
necessary. For his own part, he Imam dilmhisied tenants.
AMbig towards thus on the high pled* of " live and
Ist live," he had sever heard ems a Wars of dirigible.
gas. (Hear. hear.)
Mr. H. DRUMMOND would vete for the sealed nailer
of the hill, but he could tell the has. WI. bssurty.
WAIN it win go altered in cossasittee, as le be wry dike
what it then was, he mum give hie vote spit M es the
third Nadia& (A laugh.)
Mr. S. HERBERT mid that the hoe. gagestier kr
West Surrey's exception was decisive as to the mei of
the bill, and 'for this reason, that the great meicelty of
estates in this country were settled estates, The great
argument hitherto used against the bill was that it was
wrong to interfere between landlord and tenant, sad that
every is should be permitted to make the bah lie=
ha could. Bet this was merely a pergabeim 1111,
wee easing oonipabmy in 1
_te esegimeete, and OM 'sly
object was n enable a Milord M wake Mb* =EOM
SS he might think fair hotness himggit god kis
Mr.l TRELAWNY wield the see-eaw support epos
to the bill by the be. wither be West Surrey. Farb*
self, he should be ashme to limpet as immure imolai*
to improve the miler lives' but
believing that tipsiest big meld wag mein *gm ire
complicated, he fir Willi IND sappers the assesionA
Mr. COLES magibeed that the bill was as impels*
and invaluable 1/0111111,0.
Mr. NRWDROATE supported the bill. He had nip
sae °ideates, id that was, that the holder of a
might give es* agreements to his units as
piety obi the interests al kb sassier. Re though*
that the leepiatare should guard spit seek • emignip.
Cokes] THOMPSON mid that they had -up de
with posterity ; their {tine. wau if possible, he the
Lmeant
od CASTLIREAGH hoped that the bill would be the
of some gasman be mule the muck-vezed qua.
prose
the Mies ef ideals gad brash In Ireland.
his. P. HO WARD *seed that la the present transition
elate of apieshere, the fusers were 'added to some ima-
ms of tide kind.
Kr. CHRISTOPHER, eosins the gene al fishing of the
house, was sot bribed further to apprse the woad
reading. He begged, therefore, to witudraw his awed-
nit. (Cheers.)
Mr. PUSSY expressed his hope that Ike house would give
him Mae facilities Is the fats» stages of the bill, the more
sepolagy as the peeing esedities of the farmers was such
as se Week as delay is any mesies intended fur their
beseSt. (Rear, tram.)
goosed
The bill
emuwas, star some nalisporit movenation, read •
Oa*, quoin that the bill be eginitil this day,
Oel. 013THORP annouaced his lisidge ef opposing the
101 by every as.. and is every step. As to the sip el
beefs ,pied it to the winds. (A burgh.)
Lord CASTLIRRAOH asked whoa they might sagest
Ms high Laadlord sad Tmast Bill?
I/ 1r 0. GREY could not give a defile answer until the
Me slim important bills bad bees ascertained. With
Mpg to the grist big he thought that the misittes