The Northern Daily Times.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1856-10-11 00:00:00

CONCERTS FOR THE MILLI°I'
ST. GEORGE'S HALL.

- - ___. _ .....___ _ _
The columns of the NORTHERN TIMES have alreadY b°ll2e.
faithful testimony to the important and valuable in
floelle'
which these Concerts must exercise upon the habits, to
arrateu
and disposition of the million. We have also
h
0 Inauguration„
what took place on the occasion of the AK
Concert. To-night, the people of Liverpool call e the
musical treat more rich and rare as shown in, ha
ss
;".--,
character of the music to be given. who, thal'
heard the " Pensive Warbler, " interpreted as Will
Farrell, of the nobilities concerts,' London, renders it, "i
not feel satisfied, that the slender admission of air;
pence, sixpence, or a shilling, as the case rnal be' the
b 0.
een well laid out. Mr. Scarisbrick, so well known to
Liverpool public, will sing in his own peculiar and eff
ob, K All."
tive style, that popular song, " I'm Not Myself
at
ulr
p
than the Cherry," in which he will be accomP
But this same gentleman is also to give us, ~ a
hied by
the
Best, on the Grand Organ. Miss Landon will give out
" Fairy King," and that very pleasing ballad, ""
a- t : hot,
Backed
tallest;
Lover. e
maTdaekfionrgtthhee
theingress o
programme asf avwiahitoolres,,itsuiseh exaro
00
the singers, first-rate professionals; and the raeget
menu
satisfy the most fastidious

EXTRAORDINARY

AFFILIATION a

Thersaglieed
lbjourdogumghen-streettPhosliccse-scsouorft,tzne
Be.of
xo.
formerly a Roman Catholic priest' 0, wean
named Fanny Allen, for refusing to support hies of the
eibgneM:cvz-ae'street, who was summoned by a rut eller
iOLßilieeildAagditQe:ritnummheate child. It appeared from the evidenecut fear
complainant gone into on Monday last, that ei herflel'
years ago the intimacy between the defendant an. Oh°
commenced. She was then in service, living oppos► waucilig
defendant's house. The defendant succeeded In to
want`
her to leave her place and to engage herself as hisTbis
and it was at his house that her ruin was effected,eosee,
intercourse continued air the time she was in his yvt'e
sod
which service she left in consequence of his jeelotie
personal violence towards her. After leaving the defeeeou wee
house, matters were made up between them, the illtefreedolls
was renewed and kept up in lodgings, which the de setae
erent
took for her, furnished for her, and lived with her fe
months as her husband, under an assumed name; in did ant's
situations which she afterwards held ; and in the defend
own house, where she lived a second time us servant sea
left defendant's house, and went into another situaT4iell
then she discovered she was in the family way, ebe 10°
circumstance she gave notice to the defendant. P, to
confined in the workhouse. The defendant eallr
her there, and left her some money and clothes for tuueasila
The defendant also paid for the expense of keeping
at nurse for one year, after which period he cease" -neffo
tribute anything, though he promised the nurse, 'Os
named Ford, that he would pay for the child. la ell lea!
ration, complainant said, in November last (the e—with
born the previous December), she took lodgings mete
woman named Catherine Collins. The defendant ear sod
the house every week, until about the end of Deeeln,.bileil'ig io
paid her rent. On one occasion he gave her a shit Age
the presence of Catherine Collins. Catherine Collie ,0
then called. She stated that the defendant came eiverefis the
to see the mother and child ; that she knew he had P-itbolls
mother's rent, as the young woman was entirely Iv's, the
money until he came ; and though she did noll tee
money actually paid, as he always communicatedthe
mother in the passage, she generally saw the money 00
mother's hand after these interviews. She t3;a tb-daf
defendant give the mother a shilling, and on the h,r,-
of the child the defendant came to the mother's lougadins
brought the materia's for a plum-pudding, made the Ptiesefl•
himself, and had his share of the treat when it was ee" sod
The defendant gave a general denial to the eberge'other
attributed the statements of the mother and the oowitneeses to a persecuting disposition towards tibeliverdl
account of his formerly having been a Roman
priest. He admitted having given her money °nal.° oil
occasions, but it was from a charitable feeling. 'crire he,r,
paid her lodgings, and had furnished lodgings be
entirely from benevolence. The furniture which ;vs,
given to the young woman was given with his wife's el", the
and in her presence. Defendant's wife said she g,48. Thei
furniture to the young woman, and not her husbanu' „Tries
defendant said the mother had pasted herself off as arli-erstA
Consplatf the
woman at one of the situations she took.
.admitted that, but said she did so at the suggestien ° the
defendant himself. The reason she had not sworn life
child before was in consequence of hie threatening heifer if
if she did so, and he had promised to be a friend to eekes
she did not. The last money he paid was about ail riot
ago. Mr. Beadon wished to know why the defendantA
and
to the mother's lodgings on the birthday of the god
he
made a pudding Defendant said this was artly trtin dee
he would explain. He had been instrupmental,
Providence, of preventing the mother from eon,esi title
suicide. This was an event which every good tiewei
ought to rejoice at ; therefore he had gone a friendly
to the mother's lodgings on the birthday of the ehtthen
had made a pudding. The nurse, named Ford, ‘1" the
called. She said : The defendant promised to Pail JlO
expenses, but denied being the father of the child'
bad
said he would give money, because the complainee"", eser
been a good servant when she lived with him. TheeoooB
plainant said she could bring the landlady of the , ed
where the defendant lived with her as her husband' oee
0-er
the name of De Rope. Mr. Beadon said the case 0,11.,;e t 0
of such a remarkable character, that he would take ti,"'salt•
consider the evidence, and give judgment on Wean-seat'
on which day the landlady of the house would be PrAtese,
Accordingly, the landlady in question was in atsitell-selh
and on being sworn she stated that her name was D'''-See
Sayer, and that she resided at Pond-place, Chelsea' sore
knew the complainant. She came to her house three
ago with the defendont, whom she stated was her 131 s b,: De
.0
Complainant then stated that her husband's nam° here
Rope. Defendant was that gentleman. Defends teens,
exclaimed that he knew nothing whatever of this "farS•
and said she must be' labouring under a mistake. 00t
Sayers said she was not mistaken. He and conlYg
11118liifort.
were with her seven weeks, with the exception 1
night, when they left on a visit to some friends.
came back and stopped till the following Chrislmas'esedsatt
ness did net know but what they were married. De'viretice
before they left the house, said they were going to -",,,yielt
to see what they could do there, as his pupils were Thor
their holidays. She subsequently met him in the Vwes-i/104
road. She was positive he was the person who l'eeee
with complainant in her house. This completed theitetes
for the complainant. Defendant, in a long, rambling:losa
meet, gave a positive denial of the paternity, and state"
twee
what had already appeared in the newspapers was a ;ilia
of misrepresentations and totally false. He knew 1% 10
at all of Mrs. Sayer, and it was perfectly ridiolll°-esie
suppose that he had two bodies, one to be with
stantly with the complainant, and the other Wet
his wife, whom he never left during the time Lela
by the complainant and her witnesses. Ile the
like his wife to be examined. Mr. Beadon had
..„o°,:d coo
least objection to hear Madame Herminez. •fl'eigiete
Herminez was next sworn. She said defendant 73 noel
husband. They came to England in 1852, and had
left since. Her husband never left her. He was a'"7 the
home in the evening, and never, during the whole %et
period mentioned by complainant, hadgthh,etstipaennitktbia:loooo,
away from home. Complainant first entered their le„-reiee,
about three years ago. She then told her she was a /13.-0"
ill-treatment.
ftwoman,satmaenndt.that
Thesh e
firsthad lefttim she
witness
ihusband h
sianrr
on;
this
was a month ago. In reply to Mr. Beadon, conWnseelr,
said that after she left the defendant's she' found. '''s•§
pregnant, and went to live with a married couple, fritnnonl
here, who lodged at a Mrs. Phillips's. The defendarbit
threatened to put her into prison if she spoke against
oversen ohe athdheeahl savode threatened
been
lengthy
tnaegn
magistrate,
iase
tvrmiaduteern,dseer
he
whhieatrrhi.
nellvierr.
great
hl3,aer:a
ird
ce Olt
defendant,
dgareniteir attention,app oa rod, andhad astho greater 1
eieolnvnt
eawe
monthshh
oiecfahvwtehho
ieroralheaf
btwheeorinrsaal
itlaitovnweswweesale:
ritdhbbeesno
uriceool:;gebsabi
oat:
ttwoomatshaaoffiewnmineiesfrootetedfht
bteaaher those
oai
gicdsiavasteetrrswayt
th e same, it
bmoneyeen during the
empowered
wnahreapwehateoduatcotsfochoso.b;
year: deeso
payment
thaodf
feelings towards the woman, and from no other Ina•tbo
weekl„,,ith
_The witness Sayer had, however, positively sworn t 0
defendant as being the person who, for some mont,"s'e the,
lodgings in her house, and lived as the husbanoi."o"aens
his
s passingwhi
ef e
relied
luoi under the :t
tahani
this,
name of
rtoefahl:
her
rn Rope.
testimonyfoep re.
hTeth.r
je could e oibit,
calledwm a
altogetherwoman,
ndi
mother on other occasions was not consistent with prlbstleSti
money,
oy
n.
7Tbe
but
tthsae
saw him
was the tlhiesimt material evidence eavtihdeern
eveorvyf the w'ila
e
amtotnheey
minethheereshalneddgeiangda.paiNd
Now, was
sawothteh
et defendanthdpeeafseana defendant
aentwho
hmeoeagdriee
teu
ra
ttiphedi ii calktr:
tghoi
s Collins,witwith
was twh he o
statedmn
oo not
h mother
that
hl only
tt
duct Paaimd
c
of a minister's duty ? The defendant havinr, e"., be
credit fo •
r his proceedings as a minister, could 1.1" must
condemned as an act of kindness to the man, an woman,
it not be condemned as something
which inel'eeen
interest • as
in the child, being its birthday, rather eyed
a feeling of charity towards the mother ? Takings-fellY,
hecircumstance into consideration, and weighing theta ea—f the
rent.
such coed
was of opinion that the defendant was the father 0 to
child, and he must make an order on him to pal
weekly, and expenses.

, gusgfir'
On Wednesday evening, after dinner at the 11 til "-i-nistel
mess, somebody extracted from the pantry a quantity °„. large
consisting of a pepper and mustard box six forks, tws' Lid
altogether to then alue of £3O, Theop
table spoons, tea spoons and other ieces, alne)-Isle
ed t° 0
ained of its recovery, as most of the
been left very carelessly in an op n antry, all: kite'
tbroken up and sold for old silver, - e
might "- e hit°
a hope. , _ aop
Pie
surmounted by a crown, l'aetre„PeasppoeuaLry A
toles