The Express.
London, England, 1861-04-19 00:00:00

CouET OP COMMON PLEAS.

Sittings in Renee.--(lheare the Lent Chief Justice Erie,
and Jodie= Wilke, !tyke, and Keating.)

It \NNERNAN r. WRITE AND A4OTHZIL - WARNANTT

OF 110144.

The plaintiff in this ease was en ea tenure hop power is
Kent, and the defendants were hop mercluinte in Louden.
The plaintiff sold his whole growth of hope in lbeibl to the
defemlants for 16,700 f., and the present adios was to
reeover a moody of that suns but at the trial before the
Lord Chief Justice at Mairldooe, a verdict was enteral for
the defendant► Is cue, however, it should be determined
that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, the jury armed
the amount he was entitled to at 6,3401.
Mr. Lush sow moved for a rule to enter a verdict foe the
plaudiff f.r thin amount, and stated that the ale took
place on the 14th (ktober, a sample from each pocket of
bops basing been edmiutil by the defendants, and there
w►, no doubt that the hulk agreed with the samples.
Durum the dirriaraiou wand's( the ads, however, the
defendants asked whether sulphur had beta used in the
treatment of the bops during their growth, sod the answer
was '• Tneru was no ocarina for it as wu had no mould
this year."
Mr. Justice Willem —Med the jury mud be taken to have
to lad that this amounted to • warranty that so sulphur had
been used.

The Lord Chief .lustioa—Arel it must he tar ebo that
sulphur bed tiro used is this ',use. There were 300 acne
a hops, sad those grows on five scree hail beeu trotted
with sulphur to test some process, sal afterwards the pro-
duce of the five acres bed her mixed with the others.
The brewers would not re hops which had bleu trusted
with sulphur if they knew it ; but Uwe was no mode of
asorrtsaniug when hope were bought whether sulphur had
been used.

Lush--The plaintiff afterwards pee a written
ituiraides that be would iodennify the purchasers against
shy Lee in cosesquesce of the mode of treatroent ot the
bops a the poles, or their curies. The hops were deli-
vered at the end of Oct ,her to the defendants, and it wee
sot metal the twined's( of December that, in consequices of
some repasts, they sought to repudiate the bespis. h WOO
sow acilemitted that the goods, wrung 14411 hue& by envs-
ple sad the balk accepted. the ilefetoLiota bad no power to
repadinte ; and that the plaintiff was entitled to have • ver-
dict far the sineast asesseed by the July.
Kale granted.
BuLLIDAT r. TIN VENTIT or eT. IXONAZD, MMOMODITOI.

eraser ACCIDENT.
This was as attics to recover damages In amissironce of
the plaintiff Moir' haw throws ant of Ma chaos he its
boos drives over seism paving dowse pissed to • highway.
At tits viol brier. the Lord Oast Justice the verdict was
for the plaintiff.
Mr. Ma boirwrer, sow moved fort Ma to aster
verdict far Ihst ddasdr.l. sod stated tb• following circum-
stances :—'Thera awe 6 few_ yards of footpath by • deed
min, absflashury-striset. Hortoo, which paring.
68d Mr. Proshody, Om pariah surveyor, directed that
loos serphis dam from auother joh should be takes
than. The wariness piled the state so the road some abort
&Manes ham the MA. and it was belliered that afterwards
thsrmidle:dussms of Mom doom is tbe road. The plait..
Mlf drag Ye sand tit sight muse spans& the ohms,
sod was owl It was aostandsd that tiss vestry
us Valais. hosanna they bad sot properly lighted and
pardid the sloes; loot it was sow outonitted that elm vestry
WIWI Irv*, give'. any order ot the matter, were not re•
epureillso for what had bees dooe.
Maki ponied.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.
Maw is Ikons —Orkin Lord Chief Herm Pollock,
used Peceori Mart* Brilatwen. and Wilde.)
=nom PIIIIIANDICL —TII2 wA II
Mr. T
Mr. Bevil% QC.. frith when were Mr. Priesslad
. Jaweed Ow • wit of lobes' mom to the
body .1 M tired... with • view to Me Wog ed
her, arled4r. The tow • awe orbits est of the presseatioo
for Whey, et the kis Wakefield decks& At the kW be-
fore Nr.l6o** Hill, at York, it will he rersolleotod that
the &Minot ref he sawyer corials queetkos pot to
hiss. whim he is. cormaitted Se prime Per sir
woody sad ordered to pay • floe of 11001. far oni•
wort of amt. The limbed mousel entered at some
length Sao the facts sod cirvunistaiscos connected with the
ere, sad quoted munerose authorities to show that the
sWicaut was improperly deter sod is costal,.
Ins arguments had sot camcluard elms war report left.]

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.
(Before the Jodie Ordinary.)
cerium r. °tram IlaßOWlrr•
This was • suit umlauted by lady Gethia, lae trite et ea
Irish barurrat. Mir H. Cathie, ter • divotor as the grimed ot
emelty sod adultery.
Mr. Illeasalay, 4.C., appeared with DT. Spiaks as bar
Walt.

lad; Gethin was the daughter of a gentleman in Suffolk,
saso it,dey, and was married to the respondent et
Boisteml on the 25th of June, 1'4.. The cohabitation,
w►tc► listed for about sesta ytan, was fol-
lowed by the birth of two children. Leidy Gethin
stated that very shortly after the niarriage her husband
became very unkind ; was fru meetly abusi, r, and sometimes
med •real personal violence to her. He was addicted to
drink and was eaceseively jealous. 'two hours after her
Masai child was born, he said to ber, "1 disown that child
it is littock's"— Pittock being a man servant. After that
he ogres went near her for three days. He charged her
cousin, her brother, and Lawrence (another man servant)
with the paternity of the second child. At lenudh,
after one of his assaults upon her, she left ►im,
and went to her friends. In I fts6 be came to her in Ladtwooke
square, and insisted on her going with him to Calais,
threatening to take sway her child from her if the refused.
Ile then went to the Crimea for three or four months;
tad oa hie return she joined him at Soothers!,
when she lived with him about three weeks.
He agate ill•tsnated her, and took from her hes
watch and rings, on which he raised IN. One day
while they were at Southend he asked her to walk with him
ea the ywr, for he said that he wanted to speak to her very
y. He said he did not with to go on as they had
bat wished to get free from her. He then
asked bit to give him cause to apply for a dissolution of
theynaniage ; adding that he id not wish to be hard upon
her, and woukl Dot expose her sore than he mold help.
She was very indignant, and left him as woo after as she
*mkt Ia Itt6d Sir Richard Gethin went to lodge ■t Hounslow
with Mrs. Wham, the wife of a civil engineer, who was
t►ee is India ; and last year this lady was divorced, at tbo
•nit of her husband, for adultery with Sir Michaud
Sr. Macaulay having given evidence of the above facts,
ralle.l

Mr.. Anus Harriett Latham, the divorcee in question.
she said that sbe boor sir Rickard, and that he had lodged
•ult her at ifousslow, under the name of Mr. Grey. He
*oi at the house about fire mouths.
Mr. Macauley—Was there Jurist( that time an improper
lu:omit, listirema you!
- [decline to answer that question.
Mr. Macaulay (after a Mate)-1 think I must ask you
11.0. Have you not atievreroll that question quite re,ently!
sire. rreaserell maid that if the witness had a legal right
answering the principal question, (shout which he
.1.1.0.4 there could he no doubt) she had likewime a right
t..b.rlitie to armee the suburdioate one.
Ma.aialay said the aritoese might not object, aid re-
leat...l the questions.
W Areas -1 ass sot aware that I have ever done so.
Mr. Macaulay—l menu quite renently, and not se a wit-
Levi. IKit SY II m warm an ed in the cause!
Wittier —I Celistrnei recollection of having ever done so.
Mr. Macaulay said he wa. taco Lv surproie by the answer
of the willing. There were other chews of adultery
lotatu Ilrt Getbia, of which he should have been glad