The Express.
London, England, 1861-04-22 00:00:00

COURT OF IL7LOBEQI7IR,—Amen. 20.

Sittings in BAUNO.—(Before Lord Chief Baron Pollock,
and Baratta Martin, Bramwell, and Wilde.)
RIGHTS OP TUX AITORPITT4IINEHAL

The Solicitor-oeneral said he had to state to their lord•
ships that the AttorneyGenersl proposed to come into
court on Wednesday next for revenue cams.

Mr. Baron Martin—Wednesday is special piper day, and
generally speaker the Attorney-General does not interfere
with Mondays or Wednesdays.
The Lord Chief Barou—l think it quite right to say that
if the Attorney-General comes here on Wednesday we shall
be bound to hear him, but having bad a long experience at
the bar, and having been twice Attorney-General, this is the
first time in which I have heard an application made to tha
judges in any other form than when it was convenient, or
will it be convenient, for the Attorney-General to bring on
his cases. My learned brothers may think differently.
Mr. Baron Wilde— We are bound to speed the King's
business.

The Bolicitor•General—l thought I made the application
in the usual form. lam sure, my lords, I meant no disre-
spect to the court.
The Lord Chief Baron—No, not in the usual form, cer-
tainly, Mr. Solicitor.
It was then arranged that if the Attorney-General sp-
=d in court on Wedoeaday, the special paper would be
on Thursday.

MI LAW AMENDMENT KOCUITY V. ATTACHED:ET.
Mr. Garth moved for a rule calling on a certain person
who's acme we do not, at this stage of the proceedings, give,
to shin► cause why an attachment should not issue against
him for contempt of court. It appeared that in December
last a person named Lammingly sued a Mr. Clarke for
41. 14s. 6d., the value of some grass seed, and the writ was
issued, subsequent proceedings taken, and the bill of costs
made out in the name of Mr. Walter Foley, an attorney of
thin court, who made an affidavit denying that he bad given
any authority to the person moved against, although he had
Mr. Foley. name on his door.
Their krdshipe granted a rule nisi.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.—Aram 20.
(Before Mr. Commissioner Fans.)
CR is TIM ICROPEAN MEWL COMPAXT (.torreo).
This yam the day appointed for the hearing of a winding-
up petition presented against this company. The appli•
este* was opposed on the part of the company, and, after
hearing arguments, his Honour reserved his judgment.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS COURT.—AFBIL 20.
(Bator. Mr. Commimaioner Nichols.)
IN RE MICHAEL W. seise THE YOUNGER.

This insolvent, the son of the composer, whose case was
before the court on a former occasion, appeared under the
Protection Act for his final order.

Mr. Dowse supported.
On the first bearing a tailor, named Reed, opposed, and
after hexing his complaint Mr. Commissioner Nichols lug-
Vdis 000apoeooeof the representations the young man
.made as to his allowance from a member of his family,
that the matter should be settled. The debt was accord-
ingly settled by his family, and on the next occasion another
for started up, and notice was ordered to be given, on
which the case was adjourned to the present occasion.
Mr. Oommissioner Nichols referred to his notes, and
inquired what bad been done with the creditor, who ap-
pend.
Yr. Dowse produced the receipt from the creditors who
0
Pr Commissioner Nichols was satisfied with the termina-
tion of the case, and granted the young man his final order
of protection.