The Express.
London, England, 1857-11-05 00:00:00

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.

maw
Judea 1111111sies. away, ed )

U 70} v. BAIILrL7CONTILTILOCT TO MALL♦ WILL.

This was as'
es attics We by die leht-es-km al Yr.
Wm. Watts @Mks to norm mese properly whit=
peeled le ham tan dewlead by that gestlemea te the
see. The *IOW ciainerl the petparty spun the parr' that
tee Meister, is easearmeace of a lower manse of habitsel
hdemperamm, woe net of compeleM *lad to make a wilL
The mas had been twit... tied, sad as the lest ceassica the
trial took plane before ChM( Justice Cathleen, and occu-
pied antes low A greet body of "widows vna=ed as
tae= side, sad the remit waie s verdict for the deiadant.
XL Gm.% Q C., sow mond for a new trial upon the
LicLuot adedireetion and eotapkised of madam
leammlas up of bis loidahlp, which occupied rilia" :
in the
The., etice, etemw, said that es loag as ha had
the beam el shtiag at Mel prhu, he should emphatically
prated aphis mimes pkkag a few words oat of a ma-
in* ap, sad costenclisi that those few woods embudied the
dimities at the Mgt
Mr. Justice William wee of opinion that there Ina no
miedinetkm. The Chief Justice appeared to ham dose
tlne the 'vides,* and to hem reminded the jury of cer-
tain ftmstanota under which slat evidence was given, and
slip to ham made some comments on it which would se-
camerily have eastremed themselves to the mind of any man
of ordi shrewdness.
Role
PATRNY 11017 M MYRIAM." COMPANY V. REMOCII.

INFIROIONNINT OF • revere.
Mr. Bari% Q.C., laid this ewe bed been tried before Mr.
Jean,* Wiles, who wowsited the plahstlfb. The plaintiffs
ware powered of • patent far • mode of waking en-
ter bottles oat d rashes, • covering which
;eelertated the pecking of the bottles. The plain-
tiffs contended that the defendant had infringed
their patent right, bet two questions were raised at the trial ,
ft wee odd that there see no infringement and that the viw•
dietitian was wider than the Ulla of the patent. Upon these
points a nowit ins directed, but the mend application
wva for • rule for • new trial or to Weir a verdict for the
plaintiffs.
Role granted.

R 2 AIR ,ronor AND i-tnt niter AND DTH2I42,
Mr. Cathaok wive!. under the provisions if the act for
reerriag acknowledgments of dmds by married was=
that certain ostilkatre of ackeowledgment shoeld be
received notwithstanding sweral irregularftles The deed
wet executed by Biz Norge Grey, at the Cape of
Geed Mons ass by Mr. and him Triode,' and
Mt. Wszbarks et Albany, in Wasters Australis. In
al Cal of Er &city. ledy Orry three bad been an
Issrlesegios whirl net beret certified by the Initial of
fhe Comodesioser, bet an affidavit had been mown that
betagftwation wee in before the dams= left Eng-
lund. As to the mbar pardes there area no seamy
=kin 200 miles of Albany. and therefore the oath had bees
rdslogeland before a magistrate, and another magistrate
euttilled that he woe duly qualified. The just, however,
di twit Mao that it had been =mu at Albany;
let this, it Ina oesteaded. algal be inferred hoes
ether docemeah. Another dietcelty wee that the ocounke
its detailed the contmfteksers as "esquires," bet they
it their affidavit eppesded their tree description of matte-
mom-' It sue evident, however, that they were the rum
e there wee so rule !beg a person should dmortbe
Yerll es ea esquire elks be had sot that reek.
After rue elkimerbioa. tha were got over,
lad the area* ris isothyd.