The Express.
London, England, 1868-06-16 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

The House of Lords was engaged for some time
lent evening in a discussion raised by the Earl of
Stanhope upon the subject of public schools; but
the County Courts Admiralty Jurisdiction Bill,
and a measure for amending the law relating to
the sale of poisons each passed a stage.
As very often happens on
Po Monday, the most 'M-
eant questions addressed to members of the ge-
vernment were those of which no notice had. 'been
given. Mr. La ,ard elicited from the 'Prime
Minister and the Secretary of State for India that,
although two of Sir R. Napier's mrussagers,
Colonels Milward and Fusser, had arrived inLanden,
the gallant general's most important dogwatch, that
in which he described the distinguished services of
officers of theAbyminian expedition, had not come
to hand. Mr. Monk obtained from Mr. Disraeli a
promise that the Revenue Officers' Disabilities
Removal Bill should he put down es the first
order of the day en Friday next ; an Lood Elcho
ascertained, by appeal to the same aty, that
a holiday will be given to nil gentlemen employed
in the public offices, who are anxious to attend
the volunteer rerteu• • at Windsor next Satarday, in
the ranks of the corps to which they belong.
There waa no subetrintial opposition to in
committee upon the Irish Reform Bill, but heldtparture of the Speaker from the chair was delayed
for sonic time by a discussion which arose
upon a suggestion made by Mr. Sandford, with
the countenance of Mr. Henley, that the govern-
ment should withdraw the clauses of the bill
which related to the redistribution of seats, and
confine the enactments of the nieasnre to the ex-
tension of the franchise. Some dozen or so of
Irish and English members took part in this de-
bate, and the recommendation of the hon. member
for Malden was very generally appro.ved: Among
those who slake most strongly in its favour
were Mr. C. Fortescue and Mr. Lawson,
who were respectively Irish Secretary
and Irish Attorney-Gweral under the late
administration. Mr. Disraeli declined to do more
than promise a "respectful and mature consider-
ation " to the proposal which had been made ;
but when the rtZstribution clauses were reached
in committer, he inured their postponement, in
order that the government might have time to
make up their minds upon the subject- The first
sunendinent that excited any discussion was a
proposal by Mr. Lawson to confer the
franchise in boroughs upon the occupiers of
houses rated at 4/., instead of, as provided by
the bill, at ~more than " 4/. The Earl of Mayo
opposed the amendment on the ground that
it would materially interfere with the law of
rating without producing any corresponding ad-
venter ; and this view was, after a short con-
versation, adopted by the committee, Mr. Law-
son's motion being rejected by a majority of 11-
188 to 177. After this question had bftn disposed
of, Mr. Bearden rose to move the reduction of the
limit of the lodger franchise from 101. to 31. The
member for Athlone, who is not yet forgiven for
suggesting the abdication of the Queen, was re-
ceived as he had been 01100 before, by loud groans
from nearly all parts of the house, and
his amendment was at once rejected ; the only
effect of its proposal being to prevent the conside-
ration of a motion for the reduction of the limit
to 61., of which notice had been given by Mr.
Scrjeunt Burry. The clause providing for the
appointment of a boundary commission was
omitted from the bill ; and the next subject which
engaged the attention of the committee was the
conveyance of voters. The 18th clause of the bill
declared the payment of the expense of con-
veying voters in boroughs to the poll to be
illegal ; and Mr. Morris proposed to omit
Revere] boroughs from the operation of
this section. Varioue opinions were expressed as
to the propriety or impropriety of paying these
1.111.4`100 s ; and, while there appeared to be a
general desire to diminish the cost of elections to
the emndates, there was much difference of
opinion este how that resultemildbest be obtained
Mr. M. Chambers, for instance, recommended
the multiplication of polling booths, while Mr.
Mill expressol a strong opinion that all necessary
expenses ought to be paid by the public. Ulti-
mately Lord Mayo suggested that the amendment
should be confined to the counties of the
cities of Cork, Gehvity, and Limerick, and
this suggestion found acceptance with the
committer, Galway being retained upon a divi-
sion by a majority of 48—ayes, 131; noes, tie.
A f ter these questions had been.dieposed of, the pro-
gress of the bill was rapid and easy; and when
the Chairman reported progress only a few post-
pined clauses (including those relating to the re-
distribution of seats) and some new ones remained
to be agreed to. Two measures introduced by Sir
S. Nortlesite, for amending the law under whichour
Indian empire is governed, were read a second time
without any general discussion ; but some of their
details were criticised by Mr. Ayrton and Colonel
Sykes. Before the report of supply was agreed to
there was a short conversation between Mr. Childers,
the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Mr. Glad-
stone upon the old topics of the dissolution of par-
liament and the granting of supplies. The mem-
bers for Pontefract andiSouth Lancashire did not
hesitate to assent to the granting of the supplies
for the whole year; but Mr. Childers took
exception to the interpretation placed upon the
precedents of 1830 and 1841 by Mr. Hunt the
other evening; and, although that right hon.
gentleman argued in support of his own view of
the case, Mr. Gladstone pointed out some distinc-
tions between the attitude assumed towards the
government of the day by Sir IL Peel and
the opposition of the year 1841 and that of
his hon. friendsandhimaelf at the present moment.
In a conversation which preceded the second
reading of the Registration Bill, Mr. E. Baines,
Mr. Mill, and Mr. Laboucliere called atten-
tion to defects which they believed to exist in
the bill as to the registration of lodgers and
other points. Mr. Locke and the Solicitor-
General alleged reasons why the suggested provi-
sions were unnecessary, and the latter
hon. and learned gentleman reminded the
lime* that if the measure was defective,
its faults might be removed by the select com-
mittee to which it was to be referred. Mr. Pugh
and Sir G. Bowyer deplored the temporary aboli-
tion of appeals to the Court of Common Pleas ;
while Mr. Leeman, as an old clerk of the peace, con-
gratulated the government upon having brought in
the bast measure which could have been introduced
to attain the object they had in view. Mr. Denman
recommended that the select committee should
have poieer to examine a few witnesses ; and Mr.
Dodson, the chairman of committees, ted
oontrissiions of the time allowed for coltracting
two or three parts of the process of
registration, by means of which parliament might
be got together about the 9th or 10th of Novem-
ber. Mr. Hardy promised attention to the various
suggestions which had been offered, and said that
be would leave it to the committee to decide
whether or not they would take evidence. After
the till was read a second time it was referred to
a select committee.
The house then adjourned.

Taz PUBLIC &IMMO Bun..—Yesterday a meet-
ing wan held at the Salisbury Hotel, Plest-street, com-
mis a deputation from the oorpomtion of Bedford, and
, with a view to make common cause against
the contemplated confiscation for the benefit of the rich of
the edneafional endowments left for the lower
middle classes and the poor, whether by the
Public Schools Bill or future legislation according
to the recommendations of the Schools Inquiry Commis-
sion. After a long discussion the gentlemen present
waited upon therpiective members of parliament of their
localities, and u them at the preeen moment to watch
the Public Schoo 170037ecially, and to support the
Viscount amendments to be pro by Mr. Kerslake, M.P., and
Enfield, IL .
[Advertisement.]—Homow.ty'a Pru.s.
flatuliney, bi dieorders, Woo* enTeZint., And
Indi-
nervousness, end general debility, are all evils may be
easily sad speedily subdued by them Inestimable gran which
aver are at OnCe the mildest and meat ellisacioas medicine
yet dintovered. They do not merely get rid for
the thee of the particular diseaae, but emwelse so powerful.
beneficial, and an influence upon the whole irLeteinas
to protest it from the mcurrenee of the same Miletion. Thel im-
part tone to the stomach, restnre the mpebte, give strength and
1904. and male the patient feel himself quite • new man. Heine
.omPotad of vegetable attracts, without the admixture of arif
4dgemi....Wa'va"ub"ta6oe whatronr, thew pills are as We as they are

TEN CE ARGUS 404 L.YST .M.t#D4MB
Madr,me Rachel, otherwise Rachel Lseerson, of
No. 47,, New Bondartreet, again appeared before Mr.
Knee', at Marlboreagh-stmet, to answer &charge of oh-
till, money by false pretences tram Mrs. Mary 'Maker
B •
The court was densely crowded, and several persons of
peention were on the belch.
Mr. Digby Seymour sad Mr. Sleigh, instructed by Mr.
Troggatt, appeared for the prisoner; and Mr. M. Wil-
liams appeased for the prosecution.
Before lie easearas resumed,
Madeline Rachel begged lo be permitted to mike a state-
ment. She said she had peal an immense aura to be pro-
perly defended, and her case had not been thoroughly
attended. When a warrant was obtained against her, a
person named Aussell, fraMthe .Bice of Mr. Edwil. Lewis,
called on her and advised herto fly, but this she refused to do.
Somerlaysafterwardsshe,gamMr. Sayer,from the office of
Mr.E.Lewrs,SOLforthepcyp of her defence. She hadbeen
led to believe up to last •TSi ay that her case was pro-
gressing favourably unacrihe dreadful circumstances sur-
rounding It. About that.thae a man calling himself Davis
came to her daughter's residence in Maddox-street, and
en seeing her (Ma(huno Rachel) said a charge of con-
epiracy had been madeagainst her, and that if she would
give a certain sum of money the matter might bo gut over;
that only half-au-hourlbefore the case came on last Mon-
day she found that Ms. M. Williams was to appear against
her, and that she was not tole defended in the manner
she expected. The result wart that she was sent to pram
because she had no bail ready. She was informed that
Mr.. Sayer, to whom she had pad the money for her de-
fense, was not present, as he had met with an accident.
Mr. Knox said that statement was quite true. Mr.
Sayer had been injured by a cab.
Madame Rachel went on to say that she engaged Mr.
Froggatt to defend her, and that several briefs which
had been drawn up.by her professional advisers were not
correct, as some of the circurrudances of her came had been
omitted. She had only asked permission to make this
statement, in order to show the muddle she was in with
re t to her defence.
rr. e. Knox said having made this statement, it would
appear that, now the prisoner had regularly instructed a
solicitor, the case must proceed in the regular course.
Mr. N. Williams then rose and raid—Before he entered
upon the further examination of Mrs. Borrodsule, he
wished to state that he tad received the fullest assistance
from Lord Ranelegh and Lord Runelagh's solicitor, from
which it would ap, that with rospoot to the letters read
last Monday, T Ranelagh knew nothing about them ;
mid that Lord Ranelagh, on receiving letters from Mrs.
Berrodaiks wrote to that lady's relatives on the matter.
He proposed to shape his case thus. lie should
take she earliest opportunity of putting Lord Ranelagh
into the witness-box to show that Mrs. Borrodaile had
been the dupe of the greatest y that ever came
into a court of justice • that Lord olugh, who occa-
sionally went to Madame Rachel's shop, might have seen
Mrs. Borrodaile there, but that he had nothing to do with
the letters, and certainly could in no way have been
pecuniarily benefited. The lady, Mrs. Borrodaile, ho
would show was blinded by the letters she read, which
she thought came from Lord Bauelagb, the deception
being confirmed by one of the letters haying his lord-
ship's monogram on it. He would just say one word in
reference to the statement made by Madame Rachel just
now. The court had been told that some attempt to
get a settlement of the matter had been made. What the
person Davis (lid his client was ignorant of, and had the
proposition been whispered to him he should have
at once withdrawn from the ease, and brought
the matter before the court. He would next
call Mr. Randall, the corn-cutter referred to, who
in the coarse of causemelicm with Mrs. Borrodaile,
was told by that lady that she had parted with nearly
4,000/. to Madame Rachel, and that subsequently a man
caned on him and told him with reference to the maser-
sation ho had had with Mrs. Borraduilo that he had better
not interfere. The same person called again and said he
was Lord Ranelagh. He told the pence he knew Lord
Ranclagh, that he was not Lord Ranelagh, and must
leave the shop. He would next call the evidence of a lad
who saw the case in the newspapers, and he would prove
that Madame Rachel hired him to write her correspon-
dence, and that he remembered being asked to write a
letter in an extravagant amatory style, and that a man
who was present, who went by the name of Edwards,
said he could write a better. Madame Rachel having re-
marked that it was a schoolboy's handwriting. He would
conclude by stating he would put in Hayne's bill of costs
for selling out 1,4e01., as alleged for volunteering par-
pesos, and then proceed to call his witnesses.
Mr. Abrams, for Mr. Randall, begged to say that hie
client was not a corn-cutter, but a corn-extractor.
Mrs. Borrodaile was then called by Mr. Montagu Wil-
liams, and resumed her evidence in chief as follows :
I saw the gentleman who was represented to ho Lord
Ranelagh twice at Madame Rackets. To the best of my
belief the gentleman was Lord Ranelagh. I never saw
the gentleman represented to he Lord Ranelagh only on
these occasions. This was in May, 1866, or about that
time. After the money had been advanced I used to see
Madame Rachel every day, and I wrote letters at that
time at Madame Rachel's dictation. Madame Rachel
handed me letters and said they were from Lord Rane-
lagh. I began to receive letters in 1866, and up to this
year—very nearly the last time I saw her. The last time
I staked for my money of Madame Rachel was four months
ago. Madame Rachel always said she had not my money,
and that she always gave it to "My dear William," and
I said I should be glad if he would return it to me. She
said elue Weald write end Pk 19r it. I always gave
the letters I wrote to Madame Rachel. r remember on
one occasion while in the back shop at Madame Rachel's she
brought me a cigar, and said Lord Ranelagh had sent it
to her—it was partly smoked. This was in the early
part of 1867. I remember calling on Mr. Randall
the chiropodist, I think in Feb., this year ; and I had a
conversation with him. Mr. Haynes, a solicitor, was in-
troduced to me by Madame Rachel, and acted for me in
selling out some property to pay Madame Rachel some
money. The bill of costs is the one Mr. Haynes seat me.
It is for the sum of 1,400/.—the sum in question. I never
wrote any letter in reference to this matter save and except
in the presence and at the dictation of Madame Rachel—
except one to Messrs. Lewis and Lewis.
Ma. Seymour here handed a number of letters to Mr.
Knox, who, having marked them, handed them to Mrs.
Borrodaile, and she admitted they were written by her.
Mr. Seymour then nose-axamihed Mrs. Borrodaile as
follows :—Captain Borrodaile died in India. I came to
England in 1861. I mode the acquaintance of Madame
Rachel in 1864. I told her I had a claim to relationship
with the family of Lord Kensington. I told her that I had
a cousin a member of the same family, named Edwards.
He was a captain ; but he was now a colonel of the Guards.
His Christian flame is William. I have never seen him at
Madame Rachel's. I have relations in North Wales.
Cope is only a relative by manage. In 1866 he was
living in North Wales. I represented to him that I wee
about to be married—that was, I think, about September,
1866. Previously to 1866 I had not seen my cousin for
three years. I did not see him in 1886. I did not see any
gentleman of the name of Edwards in 1866. I saw Mr.
in 1866, when be cams to London. I did not at that
time know the appearance of Lord Ranelagh so well as I
' do now, but I knew him by sight. In 186.5 Madame
Rachel told me that Lord Rauclugh desired to be intro-
ducal to me—it might have been in June. I had money
transactions with Madame Rachel at the end of 1866. I

do not recollect her lending me 6001. She did not lend me

8001. There was not an unsettled account between na in
1866. I had made payments to her through my solicitor.
She had not lent money to me, nor found money for me.
Madame Rachel never brought an action against me. She
put me into Whiteezoes-street prison for a debt due to her
Decembtr, 1886.
Mr. Knox—Was the action in Madame Rachers name P

Mr. Seymour—lt was.
Crees-exammation resumed—Madame Rachel did not
lend me 5001. to pay bills. I will not swear the letter
produced is in my handwriting. I will not swear one way
or the other. My opinion is that it is not.
Mr. Knox—That will not do.
Borrodaile—l will not swear that it is not.

Mr. Seymour—That letter was written by Mr. Haynes,
Mrs. Borrodaile's solicitor, and he is subpoenaed here to
proclaim it.
Mrs. Borrsdailo—li do not recollect writing it. I will
swear I did not borrow 6001. of Madame Rachel for

which I gave her an order on Mesas. Grindley and Co.
Madame Rachel did not pay any money for me. I was
imprisoned in 1886. I did not borrow hou. and if I said
so in a letter it is false. I was in White Cross-street for
Ave weeks. Maclaine Rachel, before I was sent to
Whiteurees-dreet, did not send me a debtor and creditor
account—none at all. The letter produced, I think, is in
my handwriting. lam not certain, but I believe it is.
Mr. Seymour—l will read the letter. (This letter, as
well as several others, related to business matters.)
Mrs. Borrodaile—The letter was all written by iadame
Beefier. dictation.

Mr. Seymour—That is all very well ; but we will judge
of that by and bye. The letter is written to your own
solicitor.

Mrs. Borrodaile.—l was living in George-street, Han-
over-square, at the time.
Mr. Seymour—lf Madame Rachel said what was false
you need not have written it.
Mrs. Borrodaile.—She had great influence over M.
I received no account from Madame Rachel. I 'agreed
with Madame Rachel to pay 1,6001. by yearly instal-
ments of 1401. in consequence of advice to that effect from
Messrs. Lawless, Nelson, and Goodman, my solicitors, in
Graerchurch-street. I did not owe Madame Rachel the
money, but I agreed to do it to get out of Whitecrow-
street Prison. I was put in there for a debt I never
owed. Madame Rachel asked me to copy something
for her one day. rayMg it would make me clear of
everything,ever but I a.rwarrls found that it bound me
pay 1,000/., and she got the money from me in
the way I tell you.
Mr. Seymour read a letter, purporting to be written by
Mrs. Borrudaile to Mr. Nelson.
Borrodaile—lt Jaime I was incommunication with
Mr. Nelson, but I think him too respectable a man to
play into the bands of Madame Rachel. While in prison
I dal not agree at first to give Madame Rachel a charge of
1601. a year In lien of the mortgage, but I afterwards aid.
A person from Messrs. Grindley's called and prxidavel
an order for the payment of 000/., signed in the name of
Mary Tucker Borrodaile.
Mrs. Borrodaile—l will not swear the order la in my
lunalwraing, but I believe it .P.
Mr. Seymour mail another letter.
Mrs. Itorrodial•—l had been I.

licitke with

Mears. Lawless, Kelso% and Goodman, and I offered
Madame Rachel a °haws of 160 k a year on my property,
for the purpose of perng off Madame Rachel's mortgage
on R I did not Volalve many Mims from Mosses. law-
less, Nelson, and Goodmen. 1 will not swear I did not
receive a letter reduced, awl give it to Mr. Haynes. I
son afraid to asensr because I cannot recollect. After the
arrangement about the 160 k I went to Madame Beakers.
Mr. Cridhusd was my solicitor in 1866. I told every one
that the gentleman I sew was Lord Ranelagh. I had only
seen a little of him. I know Lord Ranelagh by eight, hut
always thought it was Lard Banelagh that was intredseed
to me. At the end of May, 1868, 1 was introduced to the
real Lard Ranelagh.
Mr. Seymour—And then you saw thedifferesse between
the real and the mock lords.
Mrs. Borrodaile—Which is the mock or ? I see Lord
Rauclagh in court, and was never introduced to any rue
else. At the end of May or June, 1868, I was iabroduced
to a person as Lord Ranelagh wham I kMOW new to be
Lord Ranclagh. I mean to say that Lord Ranelagh is the
ripen who was introduced tome by Madame Rachel as the
tyenwie rhewrhZo7d4Bßansinliow‘ i°ormar;7l2.l serlroaVmaattier w"
saids
There is • sitting-room and shop at Madame Rachel's.
Madame Rachel was with her &wider and a Russian
lady, and she opened the door leading from one place to
the other, and said, " This is the person who loves you,"
and I said, " Are you Lord Ranelagh r and he then gave
me his card. It is the gentleman in mart if there is not
some one very like him. I will not answer any question
about my first child.
Mr. Seymour—Yon must answer it.
Mrs. Borrodaile—l never knew Lord Basely& by sight
before 1868.
Mr. Seymour—Have you ever said that in consequence
of Lord Ranelagh's interference and leading your husband
to suspect that your first child was net his, he mur-
dered a man, and that Lord Banelagh was the cause of
the (panel between you and your husband?—Any ques-
tion put by me need not give the slightest pain to any
friend of Lord Banelagh's ; but I feel that, in justice, L
mud put it.
Snag—l will ask the question myself, wad parka's.
I may succeed in getting from Mrs. Borrodaile what you
require.
Mrs. Berretta's, in reply to Mr. Knox, then said—There
was an estraestrangement between me and my husband, through
tome one's interference ; but I never said it was through
Lord Ranelagh. But afterwards Madame Rachel told me
it was so.
Mr. Seymour—l ask her if she has not stated that her
husband murdered a man because of what was said? I,
after that Madame Rachel told me, thought Lord Ranelagh
was the person who urged my husband to kill the man 'n
consequence of the report circulated ; but I sever said
angling about Lord iielagh.
Seymour then proceeded to read the following
letters:—
Dear Maclaine Raehal,—l went to Mr. Crialand's yeaterrla
and to my horror I found Lord Banelagh there. He
was in a state, and made use of veil, tad language, and I hat
my temper. As no one was present but Mr. Cridland, Lord B.
and myself, I know that I am safe in that quarter, for It will
never paws the Mare. I really thought he would have struck me.
If be bad done so Mr. (..Yidhual would have given him in charge.
Lard R. told me there was a dear William as well as a dear
Tommy, which was very cowardly of him to expo e my affairs.
He might have spared my feelings thus far, and all might have
ended well; but when he mentioned William's name I called him
a liar and a thief. If lard It. fagot that he was talking to a
lady by birth and parkin's, I treated him as a cowardly, unmanly
vagabond. Let me implore you to give me my letters, which
will prevent me being subjected to any mere annoyancea,—l am,
1 yours very truly, MAST T. DOIMODAILa.

Witness believed the brewer's daughter referred to
was Miee Men: ; so at least Madame Rachel told her.
Both the letters were dictated by Madame Rachel, who
told her to write them to her, and she did so.

7, 0 , Feb. 20, SM.—Dear Malone
Raehen?ent'nelose ylreAna=ulred's letter, which I reocived this
morning. 'You know the meaning of it. Give me the box of
letters, and put an end to all my misery, which has boon killing
me. You shall not be made the victim to serve other people. As
dou have kept my (enflame° I shallrepay you as a lady ought to
o, in consequence of thoannoyanoes you have been put to
my unfortunate affairs. flume written to Mr. thidknd, anthr=
him about the cruel at Mx that took placebetween Lord Ranelagh
and my dear husband, and you will see that Mr. Cridland will
keep it secret. I wrote it in haste. I only told him a part. You
may rounaber that I told him mane years past, when I returned
from India, the usifortunate affair. If Lord Itariebigh had not
mentioned William's memo in the pretence of Mr. Cridland I
should not have mentioned the 'ad affair. By referring to the
card enclosed, you will see that the dates are correct.—With kind
regards, yours say truly, MIST TUCKER BORRODAILI.
The brewer's daughter hutment to tali me that Lord Banelagh is
to give hex away to-morrow. The following is a copy of the card
alluded to :—I was married on the 2nd Destsiber, 1848. First
child born the 20th December, 1847, at Brampton. Second child
born 17th October, 1840.
December 20th.—Dear Madame Bachel,—l am sorry that when
your grandchildren called upon me to-day that Mrs. Smith should
say I was not at home, for it was =true. I had not left the
house. Will you, dear Madame Bald, kindly give me the box
of letters which was sent to your hoar, and entrusted to your
care for me, or will you tell me when I can all for them. If you
are asked any questions about my affairs, please my yorl know
nothing about them. I send you a pretty little book for Harry,
as he was disappointed of the cakem. I promised him—With kind
regards, believe me, yours very truly, MART T. Ikurrioesats.
P.B.—lf you will send the box with your man Henry, I will give
him something to bring it.
' -

Mr. D. Seymour Would now go back to September, 1866:
se, George-street, Hanover-square, Rept. S.
My awn dear William,— If you knew what I have suffered since
Baturdaynight on your aecormt one unkind word would never escape
your Ups to me. Your brother-in-law went to the Carlton Qub to
we Lord Ranelagh. They told
s.himthat he was out of town, sad
bad not seen him for a ww.2. I,ls. oraLer-lh-:idif *"en went to
No. 7, New Burlington-street, and he went there yesterday and
to-day. The servant told him his lordship bad been out of town
for three weeks, and that all his letters had been sent to Lowther
Coptic. Had it not been for her being ro obliging, curse her, ft
would not have given me so mach trouble. Binne Mr. Cope
has married my airier he is quite a Welshman, and you
would agree with me had you seen the frantic manner he was
running about London looking for that invisible person who
could not be found, thanks to our lucky stare, and yet con-
tent he took us to Regent-street and bought a photograph of his
lordship, whose nose he did not admire. Poor fellow, be pet it
into MI pocket that he might take it out when he felt
inclind, width he is quite welcome to do. My brother-in-law
took me to Rachel, and she denied all knowledge of any trainee-
time between his lordship and myself, and as well she might. Mr.
Cope made me promise meet solemnly that I should leave my
present lodgings, as he was under the iropreseton that the
of the haw and poor Rachel were in league together in IPrio3h°Pnig
me into a marriage with his lordship. Mr. Cope and my sister
made me promise oner again and again that I would not see
Rachel again, sal had led titan to suppose that she had been the
promoter of his lordship's intriguing with me. When rar raster
was at Rachel's she was furious with her. I wish you could have
wen it all without being awn. Anyone less Interested than my-
self would have been highly unwed, and it was a great effort on
:3= to keep my gravity. I shall not sleep in Oeorgeetreet
t. I wialud Xr. Cope and my sister good byti,_and
returned to North Wales by the the o'clock train.—With food
and dearest love, believe me, your affectionate end loving
MAZY BORZOI:4MB.
P.R.—They would not leave town until they made me come
witlithem to Mr. Haynes, but fortunately he was not in town.
Mrs. Borrodaile, by manage , had a relation named Cope,
who lived in Wales. Had throughout thought that the
person she was corresponding with was Lord Banelagh.
When writing "Dear William," she considered she was
writing to Lord Ranelagh. Never asked her family
whether they approved of her marriage with Lord Rane-
lagh. Her brother-in-law came to London and tried to
find out Lord Banelagh ; this was in September, 1866.
Her brother bought_ a photograph of Lord Ranelagh.
Wrote to "Dear William, ' telling him his photograph had
been bought. That letter was written at Madame
Rachel's dictation. Knew Mrs. Lilley went to Moon's
along with Cope. Did not recollect whether Cope said
that Madame Rachel ought to be prosecuted if she had
committed any fraud on her. Could not recollect whether
she said that she could not be any party to a charge of
fraud against Madame Rachel, for she was indebted to
Madame Rachel in a large sum of money.
Mr. D. Seymour read the following:

ettardatitafvellinff. 7, George-etreet, Feb. 8, lea—Dear
Madame el,- Ict me implore of you to give me my letteri.
All that is ray power I will do foe you in return. I would give
you 1404 and, indeed, SHOO% if I had it. Indeed, I scarcely
know what to do. I received such letters this morning from
Wales, lam nearly distracted. I have written to-day to Mr.
Cridland and to Mr. Ha nes. I hme endows you the . It
is to satisfy Mr. who writes day to my
and is the "nsinag poet.' Mr. and Mr. Haynes are
become verygreat Mad,. I thought it advisable to write to both.
You understand the motive. You have children of your own. It
is to save my daughter's name, that her mother may not be de-
graded in the opinion of the world. You know it will not do to
have my name mentioned with Captain W. Edward's. It
would be ruin to myself and my datmhter. I still feel immured you
will not refane givhg me my letters. I will never give you cease
to regret having done so. With kind regards.—/ am, very
sincerely yours, IL Homumati.s.
Mrs. Borvodailo Raid that too was written at the dicta-
tion of Madame Rachel.

Mr. D. Seymour—Wee this also from dictation?
Thursday Ear Dec. 12.—My own dear William,—Ton will
see by the enclosed a Mr. Smith who told me that he wag Lord
Randagh's solicitor has been wry to my family, who are al/
furious to think that I bare been duped by a mad who has dis-
owned all knowledge of me, which is diahoaournble and unmanly
no his part, for I have been a good friend to him. Now my dar-
ling my diens have mane to a crisis, and I deli have to part with
yw, the ormacquenee of your daisy, had you married me, as you
declared you would do more than a year ago la the presence of
Frank, and year three misters, Mrs. We, and Btmaimeon, I
should not have written to Cluitenham to the/iamb Rotel topre-
pare our rooms. Remember what my dear Florence said, I could
not be in the same rooms with you, without being married. I wish
had been an extravagant little monkey. fl shall wait till Satur-
day. It will then be out of my power to do anythi more for
rcziwWith love whdies and kisses, ever your affsrtionate, and
)41111' BOZIODAILZ.
Mrs. Borrodaile here paused for a moment, and ap-
peared to shed tears.
Mr. D. Seymour—Take your time, Madam. Why did
you write that letter ?
Mn. Borrodaile—l wrote it more from wanting some-
thing to do than anything else.
Mr. Hnos—l must have a special note made of that
part of the letter which refers to the promise made some
time back, and the several parties named in the letter.
Mn. Borrodaile cross-examined—Mr. Smith wrote to
her friends, who were furious. Captain Edwards had a
brother. Could not say whether his name was Frank, and
Captain Edwards had three or four sisters. Lord Bane-
legli never made a personal promise of marriage, he only
did so by letter. Madame Rachel told her he said he
would marry her.
Mr. D. Seymour —ln this letter you lay you had been
duped by some one to whom you had been a good friend.
Now who was this William you were writing to and telling
that you had been duped F
Mrs. Borrodaile—l shall not tell you.
Mr. Knox—Did you conceive you were writing to Lord
Rouelagh when you wrote this letter P .
Mrs. Bo I did. I wrote to rooms at the
hotel for myself and Lord letter I
wrote I thought I wrote to Lad

Mr. D. Seymour than :
X. Oeorge-ativet, Hanever-ogaeno. lAeb. 8, 1686.
Drar here eat nveima tram Madame liach4 the box
containieg latent whisk: by W. Edwards left at ler hoses
for me. I Mall feel singed by your emelt In Madame Rachel.
and 'equalling be M give them be me without iiiihr.—Yeara
akar r. 11/1111RODAILIL
.1. Harem, Mee.
Mrs. Borrodaße said she wets the letter, biker' that
Captain Mime& had left a hex coats/elm ler Idlers
with Madams Rachel, sad hal tea her seliciter, Mr.
en. When Me wrote drat liblwarils had left the
boa, she meant that Lied Remake' had left it.
Mr. Knox said—U kis period astkiag in the evideaes
has appeared to isaptieale Lord limekiln is the least
degree. I have, bosestsrer thought it but fair to give his
loniship an opportimityeemaking his statement.
Lord lienelagh-1 has only to repeat what I /debut on
the pravious occarion. I have ae cognisance of anything
that has taken piece between Madame Rachel and Mr..
Borendaile. Nnananeeyy affair"; have ever taken place in
which I wan caonceneel, and I only heard of these matters
in November' HIV, I immediately put the case into the
hands of my solicitor, who omaniameated with the rile-
tivcs of Mrs. Borrodaile, and since then I have had no-
thing to do with the matter. ha some scandal has eccurrel
in one respect I may here state that the story Meat look-
ing into a lady's bath is wholly unfounded.
Mr. D. Seymenr—l ask, whether you were introdaced
in May, 1868 V
Lord Ranekgh—l swear I never knew Mn. Borrodaile
by sight, and only recollect seeing her at Mr. Cridland'e
unke.
Mr. Knox—Mrs. Borsodaile's statement is that she
raw you at Madame &Whorl is 1866, and was iatroduced.
Lord Razielagh—l might have been at Madame Rachel's,
and Madame Rachel might have named Mrs. Borrodaile
to me, but I only gave a passing glance, and should
not have known her agar.
- • - -

Mr. 81eigh—I can only say we are too glad to give Lord
Ranelagh an opportunity of =hag his statement.
The case *as then &dimmed on bad.
Mr. Edward Lewis begged to be allowed to make a reply
to Madame Rashers start. He had only deferred Ms
answer at the time as he did not wish to interfere with the
course of proceedings. The explanation was of much im-
portance to him.
Mr. Knox would suggest that Mr. E. Lewis should ar-
range with Madame Embers solicitor the time for an ex-
planation.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.- JITNE 15.

After Terra Mai Priva Sittinga at Westminster.—(Before
the Lord Chief Justice and a Special Jury.)

DIST ALLAH V. WHISEHIJIST AND °THEM.
After our report left yesterday, the plaintiff continued :
After leaving prison 1 saw Mr. Kimber, my solicitor, on
the following day, and he accompanied me to my hotel ;
he asked me to send a telegram for him. I did so, and on
my return he said a Turkish gentleman had called on the
part of the Turkish consul to see me, and showed me
his card. I said I had never beard of him. Mr. Kimber
said, "He looks a very nice fellow and I have made an ap-
pointment to meet him at his hotel, and accompany him
to the Turkish consul-general's." We went there, and I
was introduced to Asmond Effendi, and we went to the
Turkish consul's. After that the Turkish consul ex-
pressed his readiness to render me any assistance.
clatiluie
thought he was a friend of the Turkish
I had never seen Osman Effendi before that
day; be invited us to dine with him, but
on our inviting him to dine with us he ac-
isipted it. Osman was a very good linguist—he
spoke French, Italian, English, Arabic, and Turkish—he
expressed his readiness to do anything for me; he said he
was acquainted with several families at Antwerp, who,
lie said, were anxious to assist me • he also said he was
very intimate with Mr. Grey, brother of Sir George Grey,
then Secretary of State for the Home Department; he
offered to lend me money and to assist me in other ways ;
he always appeared to be well off he kept good society
had good wine, rode in cab e, and invited me to dine with
him ; he introduced me to a person named Hermanaen, a
friend of his, a Danish consul iii Paris; I was in-
troduced by Osman to a person named Verstraaten,
a petroleum merchant, the father-in-law of Her-
mansen ; ho lived in good society, gave good
dinners, and drove about in a carriage ; shortly
after my liberation I became ill from typhoid fever.
was told that I lost my sexism for • couple of days.
Osman paid me much attention. He was the only per-
son I knew there, as Mr. Kimber had returned to Eng-
land. Osman nursed me during my illness. During that
time he and Hermansen busied themselves about my
affairs. I placed my affairs when at Antwerp entirely in
his hands, and he took possession of everything. I also
authorised him to obtain my property from the authori-
ties, and also to settle my hotel bill. Mr. Kimber advised
me to entrust my affairs to Osman ; there was no proof
on the trial of any dealing between me and Osman
before the death of Ridley. On my return to England I
owesponded with Osman. (The letters were put
in and read.) Osman asked me to get him
employment DI London, and I spoke to the
Turkish consul. He told me he had been employed by
the English government to buy cattle for the Cnmean war.
That was true. He said his brother-In-law was the Sul-
tan's doctor, and on inquiry I found the Sultan had a doc-
tor of that name. All his letters were seized when I was
arrested. I was interrogated abo at their content, by the
president at the trial. I wrote Osman that I should be
very glad to see him in London, when be had arranged
my affairs at Antwerp. He afterwards came to Loudon and
stayed with me in Weymouth-street. At the end of July,
1865, he left for Paris. (The letters referred to by Mr.
Serjeant Parry in his opening statement were put in and
read.) Suliman Bey was staying with him when he re-
ceived Osman's letter to change the money into English
notes, and a request that the letter should ho
burnt. Suliman Bey advised me to retain the letter
and take the number of the notes. I retained the letter
and Suliman Boy took the number of the notes, and I
placed the money the same day at my banker's. Oxman
returned to London almost immediately, and offered me
80/. to keep for him, but I declined, fearing I might lose
it. He m.4"Put it with the rest at yourbankees." I paid
it in. When Osman ca me to London he said he expected pro-
perty in Turkey and the interest to come to him. He said
he had got this money from Constantinople. I paid him
sometimes in gold and sometimes in cheques. I made ap-
plication for 1,0001. on Ridley's life policy, but I was in-
formed I must first produce • certificate of his death. I
was at BriOton, and I wrote to Oman respecting it,
and I asked Lim to fill up • printed form. He afterwards
said he had made it and eent it, certifying that he knew
Ridley to be dead. (The fabricated certificate of Identifi-
cation in which he stated he knew him before his death.)
He knew him after death, and followed him to his grave.
The Lord Chief Justice—Did the company pay 1,0001.
Mr. Serjeant Parry—Yes.
The Lord Chief Judico—Because most of the offices
have a clause against suicide.
once saw Hermansen in London and
Brighton, but he did not stay with me. When I was at
Brighton I received a letter from him from the prison at
Hastings. I never associated with him in England. I
showed the letter to Osman, who was at Brighton at the
time, and I afterwards saw Hermarusen in Hastings gaol,
and also Mr.Glenisten, the superintendent of-the Hasbngs
police. I did not offer to supply funds for Hermansan'e
defence. Gleniden, when examined at Brussels, did not
Pay that I bad offered to supply the funds. Hennansan
was tried and convicted for robbing • friend of mine at
an hotel. After hie conviction I received a communica-
tion from his wife asking me to go and see him, acid
I did so. She was the daughter of Varstraaten.
I never saw him afterwards. In December of that
year the China Steam Company made a call
for sharer, and Mr. Kimber advised me to pay. it. He said
if a friend called on him, he might save the mitered and
the lawyer's expenses. Osman offered to settle it for me.
I obtained a checque for 2501. from my agents (Messrs.
Abbey Bros.), payable at Messrs. Roberts", which I gave
to Osman to offer at once to settle without expenses, and
take a receipt for it. He us to meet me at the Royal Ex-
cheese. He came back and said be could not see the se-
cretary. I asked him to remain and arrange it for me
before three o'clock, at which hour I would call on him,
and if he bad not arranged it, I would go to the banker
and pay the cheque and interest. He was enable to settle
it, end I paid the call and interest by cheque. I know
nothing personally of the attempted fraud -by Osman on
Messrs. Roberts and Co. His oommumeaticam with
Mews. Abbey have continued up to this time, and ono
a 1 the partners came to Brussels and gave
evidence in my favour. They never believed
in any complicity with him. I afterwards went to Paris.
I had promoted • company for the establialiment of flour
mills at Beyrout. Messrs. Kimber and Ellis were to be
the attorneys, and Osman the secretary. In January
Omen joined me in Paris, but before this he had gone to
Spa to settle Ridley's debts. At this time I received the
1.000 insurance. I stopped at the Grand Hotel, and
Oman in the Rue Castigltone. On the 29th January I
lost my pocket book. I have not been able to get any
documents from Brussels since the commencement of this

trial.
The Lord Chief Justice said he should have thought
they could have been obtained through the intervention of
her Majeety's government.
Plaintiff said he had done his best to get them, but
without suceees.

Mr. Baker Greene said an attempt had boon made to get
than through Lord Stanley, but without sumac The
Procureur-General refused him (Mr. Baker Greene) 'to
have any of the documents.
Mr. Serjeent Parry said photographs of the documents
had been allowed the other lido, but refused to the plain-

plaintiff hoped his lordship would write for them.
The Lord Chief Justioe said that if her Majesty's
government had fulled to obtain them it would be
useless for him to to for them. All he should
have been asked for was to entrust the docu-
ments to some one to produos in court. If we
had got him here with the documents we could get
them out of him. (Some delay was caused in consequence
of a slight misunderstanding between the learned counsel
on thisEilst.)
The tifs examination in chief ocespisd the whole
a the y, sad MA aci esatisied Was gis wart raw

COURT OF COMMON FLEAR.—JumE 15.
Sittings at Nlei Prim, in Middlesex.—(Before Lord Chief
Justice Sevin ens) a Special Jury.)
ILLS a ILLITNCRT.
Nomrs'fili 7tecuarecoveractiondmagemaipaist thi,:rprioderlimetoprubolifstie linnatitriith
paper. The defendant pleaded in pi/Ur-Mimi that the
airlibels were tree.
Quain, ac, and Mr. Francis appeased for the
Oaintiff ; and Mr. M. I:bombers, Q.C., and Mr. Joyce for
film defended.
The Osintiff masa clerk in the War-office ; he had been
siouneeW with the Civil Service Co-operative Association,
and he and some other gentlemen started a similar
a,s,cs iatieua at Lewisham. In Augast last they pub-
lished a circular, u which they stated thut the stores
had been eatabfiabed to supply the public with articles
of consumption at the lowest possible price, and they also
stated Mar the association was registered wider the
lith and 26th Viet., cap. 87. The transaction now
in question commenced by Dr. Shute writing to the
Kentish .Allereury in reference to his retirement from
the association. Upon this circumstance 110111 e wm-
meats were made in the paper, and it wan stated
that the West Kent Supply Association wee so daring and
desperate an attack on the interests of shopkeepers in
the district that the editor proposed going fully into the
matter in his next number. In accordance with this pro-
mise the defendant ppuublished an article in which it was
stated, "Frona circular that has come to our possession,
which will be reprinted in theme columns as a portion of the
text of our commentary, it appears that the gentlemen who
have formed themselves into an association for selling tea,
sugar, treacle, butter, bacon, short sixteens, rushlights,
and lollypop! at cost price, have quarrelled with their
head shopkeeper, Mr. B. J. E Annegarn, who has in con-
sequence let the cat out of the bag. Ile explains that Mr.
Johnstone and his three cost-price' colleagues in the
direction—Mr. John Keen, clerk in the War-office depart-
ment; Mr. J. D. F. Farrell, clerk in the Royal Arsenal ;
and Mr. F. Miles, of Lewisham, another civil servant—
have secured for themselves 60/. each for the first year as
directors' remuneration, the remaining profits in
on their sake on ` met-price' principles to be divid
share and share alike between the Said four clerks in
her Majesty's service and the aforesaid B. J. E. Annegarn,
in .he service of themselves. We should be curious to know
what reply these clerks will have to make to the respective
heads of departments if they should be asked, as we fully
expect they will be, when they and other public servants
who are engaged in these Supply Associations have suc-
ceeded in ruining the poor shopkeepers who, as tax
payer help to provide for the payment of your salaries ;
What p Mon do you propose should he made for repair-
ing she deficiency in the national receipts which your
grovelling views and grasping propeditiss have occa-
sioned Y"The next publication complained of was a hand-
bill headed " Amateur Shopkeepers," and which stated
that in the next paper would be published an account of
the association, with "some commentary on the pernicious
combination of government clerks calling themselves
directors, but who are in reality nothing more
than a body of traders endeavouring to cajole the public
and destroy their fellow-shopkeepors." The next arti-
cle complained of stated that so far from the asso-
cintiuu
selling at wholesale prices, they had charged for
40 yards of chintz 1-9th more than the wholesale price,
and that the association was deacrilml as a "limited!"
one, when it had not been registered as such ; and it
was suggested that the heads of departments should
inquire " into the mischievous tendency of allowing
their clerks to become retail shopkeepers, and whether
any of them have deceptively published themselves as
a limited liability company, to the discredit of the public
servi, and the injury of the toiling classes of her Ma-
jesty's subjects, and finally to solicit the heads of de-
partments to ascertain by examination of the clerks en-
gaged in such trading operations whether they have in
any instance drawn any portion of their trading stock
from the stores of government contractors."
The plaintiff and the other directors were called, and
they denied the truth of most of the statement mule in
the defendant's paper, and in particular they denied that
they were to receive any money from the associations • and
that any charge beyond the sum paid to the wholesale
house had been charged for the 40 yards of chintz. It
appeared that the association was not registered when it
started, but was soon afterwards.
Mr. Annegarn gave evidence for the defendant, to the
effect that the statements which had been made in the
paper were true. In particular, he said the directors were
to have 601. each, and that the balance of the profit was
to be divided among them and him. He also said that
many of the goods at the store were supplied by a govern-
ment contractor. _ . .

The plaintiff wu recalled, and said that he did not
know that the person who had supplied the grvxls in
question was a government contractor. In the depart-
ment of the War-office in which he was, they had no-
thing to do with contractors or contracts.
His Lordship left it to the jury to say whether the
articles complained of were fair comments upon a matter
of public interest; and, if not, they would then consider
whether the defendant had made out his plea that the
statements complained of were true. The plaintiff would
be entitled to a verdict only upon the jury finding in his
favour upon both these te
The jury, after cord ering the matter for 20 minutes,
found a verdict for the plaintiff—damages, 101.
His lordship granted a certificate for costs.

TIONE TEACHING FOR THE BuND.—Yesterday the
anniversary meetingof the society for this object, inconnec-
tion with which is the Alexandria Institute for training and
employing the blind, was held at Willis's-rooms, Colonel
Itowlandicu occupied the chair. A somewhat novel feature
at these meetings, and one that by no means detracts from
their interest, is that the majority of the audience are those
whose afflictions and necessities have brought them within
the scope of the society's operations, the " visitors" being
confined to the centre seats; and amongst them were ob-
viously yesterday many of the relatives and psrsonal
friends of those who had been benefited by one
or other of the affiliated societies. The object
of the Home Teaching Society is to teach the blind to read
by means of an ingenious system of raised letters, the
foam of which can be felt with the fingers. It also pro-
vides free lending libraries of books printed in this raised
INDIGENT BLIND VISITING SOCIETY. —The annual
meeting of this society was held yesterday afternoon, at
the Freemasons' Tavern, under the preailemcz of Lord
Ebury. Its object is to ameliorate the condition of the
destitute blind resident in London and its vicinity, by
providing them with readers of the Scriptures at their own
homes; with conductors, when needed, to take them to
church and to the classes established by the society; and
by instruction in reading the embalmed characters, to
invented by the late Mr. James Halley Frere.
tknooLa OF ART.—The Lords of the Committee
of Council on Education offered to every teacher of art
schools visiting the Paris Exhibition the sum of dl. in aid
of his or her expenses, and an additional sum of 2/. for
any one report which any such teacher might make, or
any useful suggestions in respect to his or her duties or
teaching derived from the study of the exhibition. The
exhibition was visited by 101 art teachers, of whom 28
made reports amoved by their lordships. The first prize
has been awarded to Mr. W. J. Mue.kley head master of
the Manchester School of Art; the second to Mr. Walter
Smith, head master of the Leeds School of Art; and the
third to Mr. Dewar Campbell, master of the Bridport and
Dorchester Schools of Art.

---
TnE Blx.wiNonAlt HORDE AND HOUND Snow.
—This popular exhibition, which is announced to be held
in Bingloy-hall, Birmingham, on the 'arc!, 24th, 2.ith, and
26th instant, bids fair to be even more attractive than in
former years. The entriee, which show an increase in
numbers, amount to upwards of 2.30,and will include many
of the celebrities exhibited at the late show at Islington,
amongst which may be named the winners of the mile
trotting match and the piebald pony which was so admired
by the Princess of Wales.
A NEW STnEwr DANGER.—Mr. Payne, coroner,
held an inquiry last evening at St. Bartholomew's Hos-
pital, relative to the death of a painter named Charles
Stacey, mod 36, who was killed by the fall of a " cradle "
suspended in front of a house. The deceased's family
was represented by Mr. Mote, solicitor ; and Mr. Lewis
appeared for Mr. Leyeber, the owner of the "cradle." It
appeared that the deceased was employed on Thursday, the
28th May, in painting the front of No. 30, Noble-street,
and he and another man stood in a cradle suspended from
the fourth floor by means of ropes 16 feet long. The
ropes broke, and the deceased was precipitated to the
ground receiving fatal injunies. It appeared that the
ropes ghatean in use nearly six years, and Ur. Loyeter de-
weeda rope of that kind should last nine years. A
practical men on the jury, however, dissented from this
view, and said that the rope which broke was so rotten
from age that the strands, indeed of supporting half •
hundredweight, gave way under the pressure of a pound.
The danger eonesqiiint upon the use of ouch ropes °m-
anned not only the men in the cradles, but the public
walking on the pavement underneath. The jury returned
a verdict of "Accidental death," and added that there
was great neglect on the part of the master in not provid-
ing_proper ropes.
BI7ILDING GRANTS FOR SCIENCE Scuola.—The
Committee of Council on Education will be prepared to
make grants towards the building of schools of science at
the late of 24. 6d. per square foot of internal area, up to a
mazmaum of 600 E, for any one school on condition that
the school be built under the Public Libraries Acts (13 and
14 Pic., c. 86; 18 and 19 Vic., c. 70; 29 and 86 Vie., C.
114) ; or be established in connection with a school of art
aided by .a department building grant ; and that the terms
of the minute of the 19th Deoeniber, 1866 (No. 603) relat-
ing to building grants for schools of art, so far as appli-
cable to schools of science, be complied with.
DYSPEPSIA, CONSUMPTION, &C., CURED BY Dl7
EA ITT'S lINTALDIITA ADADTTA FOOD TO TDB Siresaes, sorer.
lIDDS. end INN of
fl
rikial
insaang.and ming. without medicine or ex.
Erigm"- - I.7.6.4,4p=ittladosiVudeNtigi
to .7
eases =tellf""ansaWayeuma== of WI }foli-
ages the Pope. It eaves IWO Wen its Net in caber. remedlee—
The. IN. le ad.; Me.. Ise ; toe, or pd. par Neel Also the
IIIODDIDD Chocolate Pander, sere etreapthenint Ulm .'onoen-
tested beef.—Da Duty end 00., 17. Reaen=asoni,, London;
also Pertness and Mason end at el. %ocean AMA; 4, Cheep.
aids : O and ISO. Oailaa aaat—(Adv'sikleartl
Mrs. S. A. Allen's World's Hair Restorer or
=ealliCT:r
btartDeak =lore raiz fed Iketntat:
rpota It win promote Nutrient re k lam
&NUN eelni. • Ibis Mk Wakened. Ikeldsatioretonted. It
rej="l4ZeriZero sad fra niett"anake gamble. Ili
=be el I= ata 41 Le I dma= ei=lAl Its