The Express.
London, England, 1850-07-05 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, FRIDAY EVENING, JULY 5, 1850.

the principal thoroughfares leading to say of the
large milosy statioos. (Hear.) Hs awaited that un-
a alarm had Imes ensiled *
_the inhabitants
of E. ridge by *e speallestka• whisk had been issued
by the Balding Commeitim. Tba inmeumiedg the con.
missiesses to the build*, Wesel* that they should
erects building
.se es esissW as wad possibly be done
la enaionnity with the object in view. The committee bad
coma tO the conclusion that it was *livable to use a more
durable material than mere lath and plaster, and bad justi-
, fled that conclusion is their repeat. As to thevrezeed
demo,whieh had ideated mmeidesuble alarm is se
sons' Weds, he believed he taught repeat what was GUM
him is a very bed paa, by • friend that morning, that " it
was doomed." (Hear, hear.) Attar the alum whisk had
been excited 1 y the proposal to employ bricks and
mortar in the ceestrution of the heaths , he,
se on individual commissioner, skald eert y op-
pose its adoptioa, even U they were obliged to use a
worse material. It was possible, also, that means might be
band to diminish the slued the buildiag, and consequently
its cost. Another objection wee founded en the number of
special constables that would be reader* Rosemary, by the
extraordinary crowd of persons collected in Hyde-nark.
This, he bedeved, had been much overrated. lie had been
informed that at the Agricultural Society's shows, where
perhaps 12,000 people were brought together, from 20 to 30
extra policemen were all that were required. People who
lived in the metropolis were familiarised with crowds, and he
did not anticipate that the crowd in Hyde-park ceased by the
exhibition would be very much greater than the gatherings
frequently emu in the metropolis. He implored their lord-
ships not to refer this question to • saw committee.
After a few weeds from Lord BRoucestut and Lord On ex-
glum acres the table,
Earl GREY said that the notice of the noble and learned
lord wee merely that he would call the attention of the
house to the subject—not that he would move for it, refer-
ence to a select committee. When a notice was given in
that form, it wee ales)e understood not to be the intention
of the morn. to Mir:Audi matter which might mute e
difference of opinion ; sad it was the laverieble prefabs', out
of sommon courtesy, when • modes wee to be made
was likely to be opposed, for notice to be given of that mo-
tioo. (Hear, bear.)
Lord Ditottogam said a few words mom the table.
Lord CAMPBELL said he should support the mo-
tion, if it were pressed to a division. lie should
hare preferred • arnica for a humble address to
her Majesty, praying that the proposed erection
in Hyde-park might not be farther sanctioned.
He blamed no one for what had been done hitherto ; but if,
after the matter was fully understood and the lamentable
consequences pointed out, the project wee not abandoned,
some one would be very mach to blame. He approved of
the exhibition generally, and of the appointment of com-
missioners ; he only regretted that they had not exercised
a little more discretion and foresight. Their report showed
that the probability of the exhibiting interfering with the
comforts of the rendeats in ilyde.perk bad never entered
their minds. He thought it quite possible to find a better
site. He Mould regret were the exhibition to be aban-
doned ; but he thought that would be preferable to taking
possession of Hyde-park, and depriving the public of what
they bad so Inge enjoyed.
Lord BROINHAM said that after what had been inti-
mated by the noble earl apposite (Ore') be should not press
his motion to a division. The noble and learned lord, after
some remark., presented a petition from inhabitants of St.
Oeorge'e, Harover-square, against the exhibition taking
place in Hyde perk.
Lord ILEDESDALE said he regretted the choice of site
that had been made, and hoped that the matter would be
farther considered by the goverament.
After a few words from the Earl of LONSDALE to the
same effeet,
Earl FITZWILLIAM said if the exhibition interfered
with the enjoyment of the park in one way, it would add to
it in another. (Hear, hear.)
The Earl of ELLENBOKOLIG 11l said that after looking
at the plan of toe buildtug, and cusidering the liability to
fire, he was induced to hope that all the resources of art
for putting oat fires would form part of the exhibition.
(Lauglrer.)
The mottos was then withdrawn.
Mein setts from the Commons brought up several
METROPOLITAN IN I:EIiNIENTS BILL.
This bill was referred to a stlect committee op stairs, eater
n short diseueeion, in which the Earl of Carliale, Lord
Brougham, toe Marl of Etienborough, sad the Bishop of
London, took part.
The bill was accordingly referred to s select committee.
BENEFICES PLURALITY BILL.
Lord LYTTELTON, in moving the second reading of
this bill, said he had been requested to take charge of it by
those who had conducted it through the House of Com-
mons. The bill did not allow a plur tidy where oW:ice of
the livings was worth more than 1001. He thought that
pluralities should be allowed where suc of the livings was of
a greater value.
The Bisheip of LONDON said he and his right reverend
brethren acquiesced M the general principle of the bill, but
they sheuid have certain amendments to propose in com-
mittee.
The Bishop of SALISBURY expressed some dissatiafic-
tion with the scanner in %kith the till had been introduced
into the other house, and also with the partial chaster of
its provisions.
After a few words from Earl Puwes and the Lord LYT.
TLLTON the bill was read a second time.

THE METROPOLITAN INTERMENTS AND GE-
NERAL BOARD OF HEALTH BILLS.
On the motion of the Earl of CARLISLZ, these bills were
referred to select committees.
LARCENY SUMMARY JURISDICTION BILL.
The Earl of CHICHESTER proposed the woad reading
of this bill. It did not propose to effect any change in the
law which could be in any sense prejudicial.
The bill was then read a second time. To be commAted
on Thurs lay.
Their lordships then adjourned, at ten minutes after nine
o'clock.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.—TiItIngDAT, JULY 4.
The 8 took the chair at 12 o'clock.
TEL DEATH OF SIR R. PEEL, DART.
After the despatch of some private business,
Sir U. GREY rote and said—Now that ail the pri-
vate business has been disposed of, I wish to move that the
consideration of the ening of tne day be p •o•poned until
the afternoon. I regret that the bran should have been
out to any icconvenience by this early meeting to-day, those
orders having been filet' se vend days ago for consideration ;1 tit
my noLle friend, the First Lord of the Trk&Slirr, is anxious
to take the first opportucity of the house meeting—(here
the right hon. baronet bent down his head, and paused
for some moments, being evidently moved to towel—and
before any public business is proceeded with, to express
the feelings which he, is common with every mem-
ber of this house, and the whole country, enter-
tains with reference to that lamentab:e occurrence
which has recently takes place; and be is particularly
anxious that he should be enabled to do so when there io a
full a•tendence in the house; and I have, therefore, to ask
the house, it having now been constituted, to separate at
once, and that you, sir (addressing the Speaker), should tali"
the chair at half-put four o'clock, when my noble friend will
be in hie place. If the house agrees to that motion, I hope
so discussion with reference to it will now take plate. (Rear,
hear.) I have only one word more to add, and that is to
sapless my deep regret, and to apologise to the house for the
anay.idable absence of my noble friend, who was not present
yesterday, to concur with the house most sincerely in that
most appropriate mark of respect which the house unsni.
nosily adopted to the memory of that great man who has
been removed from us by the painful and mysterious dispen-
sation of Providence.
The motion was immediately agreed to, and the house
adjourned until half-past four o'clock.
The house again met at half-past 4.

Minimum BILL.—By Mr. MASTERMAN ;several),
from places in the city of London, in lac -ur of this bill.
Jaws' PARLIMIIIITAXIC OATH BILL.—By Mr. MAS-
TERMAN, from a parish in the city of London; the
Illescluis of DOURO, from Norwich ; Mr. NE WDEGATE
(soveral), from places in Warwickshire, Northumberland,
Lancashire, Yorkshire, Rutlandehire, Somerset,
Worcester, Gloneester. Orfordshire, Norfolk, Kent, and
Surrey ; Mr. FULLER (3;, from places in Sussex ; Mr.
ROBERT PALIAKR, from a place in Berko; Mr. EOU N-
DELL PALMER (5), from Plymouth and other places;
Mr. SPOONER (3), from places in Warwickshire ; Sir R.
11. INGLIS, from place in SOH; Rises, end Suffolk; Mr.
ADDERLEY. from Biddelplt„. Mr. DUPRE (8), from
places in Buokienhamshire • Mr. BRISCOE, from rector and
parishioners of Oro, SWINK :Mr. FLOYER.(2), from Dorset.
shire; Mr. PLUMP TILE (5), from plaus in Kent, and from
Sokewak• Donst ; Colonel TREVOR (4), from places in
South Wiles ; against this bill.
Poer-orrice.—By Mr. KUNTZ, from the mayor and
corporation of Birmingham; Mr. SIIAFTO ADAIR, from
Cambridge; Sr G. STAUNTON, from a pleas in Hemp-
shire ; Mr. ELLICE, from Coventry ; Sir ROBERT
PRICE, from Mayor do., &a, of Hereford ,• against the
recent Post-ofßes ventilations. Mr. TENNEI4T, from Pree•
bowl= congregations of Belfast, against the transmission
' of letters on Sandals. Mr: FLOYER, from Haselbury,
Does*, praying that du recent postal regulations may have
• fair trial.- Mr. ADDERLEY, from Stone, against Sunday
labour.