The Express.
London, England, 1861-11-27 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, WEDNESDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 27, 1861.

taetw,r —Dee. 17. H. Tare. Pt. Jolts's-square, Clertenwell, aid
leauttumt, Mom width manufacturer —Dee. 7U. E.
ithmreetrr. canter-IW. Iv. D Whalta Bristol. !wilier—Dv,
16. W. iaky and W. T. ItVey, setal..) WaLt..ol.
Staihmlahlre, 'net maelers—Dve. U. T. r:u nn, Multi Drayton.
.hr.qathire. timber Merchant—Dee. Is. J. Tall. lihsptton New-
nan. tar thatWer Iv. IL IL Vanalek. Newtastle.upou.
Tyne. wine trivrylituit —Dec. 70. J. Altm. Durham, Irma merchant.
CLitTIVICA ILPtu he granted. auk.' came he aLown to the

contrary oat or before the day qf mooting.
Dee. If W. E. lute, fit. Linastan's.hill. City. •ma broker
the la. V. J. Mansell. lialisbury. Wilts. lincodrover—Dec. ilk
J. l'atrs. Ite'J. ate eel. in.dinfacterer
Lire. *NI. W. V. N. Murk* Realm," Norfolk, tailor— Dec.lo.
U. lionnorsoicy Novvroati, Surrey, Ulmer—Dec. lo
J. Large, 11tota, ii•okshiro, cattls salesman—Dec. 111. J. B.
'tray. 11 u Iy, Illiklievra, draper - Der. IV. .1. Y. Calvert,
Laninshire..traper—Der. 19. J. T..ylor, Nlanulo,ter,
goner —Dec.llll. J. naoditonl. Anerianton, Lancashire, contractor.

PARTNIMSAIIPS IoNi•ALVLD.

.1. Accra.. I• and It. A. Liorrluutnii, Slanchistcr,
coninalishe agents - Jelnolaila Itrosles and T. Ithodea she Meld,
V.; kinu e, mannfacturers of SHIM, Waled goods—C. Marsden
and A. Thackrah, Haitian. Yorkehlre, wire drawers—W. Kent
and .1. Bullock, ratemoster.rusr, City, booksellers—W. rind..
and .1 fiollition, Bull and Beverley, auctioeers—J. Lock,/ soot
J. Tllll/11111% Curililtiainiorganshlre, drapers—G. talon and E.
►median. ~h,-Mehl, Yrs Wire, cabinet makers-11 fide and it
Da.r, Kilmontonolrapers -• hamar and E. J.
Hommel,. lit•ver. Kent, printers—T. Smith and J. G. Kenyon,
Accrington. Lancashire, warperi U. Lazonby, K. W. Taylr,
and Hear, jun., beetle, Yorkshire. woollen cloth merchanta,
solar m nitarila It. Leer, Jun.—W. Anwyl "'set K. J. Aulryl,
tinl-
aelly.Merionethshlre,grocen—T. Brandreth and J. Weaves,
Stockport, Cheshire, drapers -J. Sparks and C. T. Spark■, shoa-
l:me, lily, East Drdia ageliti —B. Whiteley, J. Buckley, and A.
Eaton a, uldham, Laniaishire, cotter .siduners. so tar a. regards
J. 101.-kley --W. Taylor. J. Taylor, and T. Taylor, Walsall, Mat.
foriPilore Maier*, so far as regards W. Taylor—J. C. Gill and J.
Larratt,Clowlle, Cbashirs, smiths—S. Hirst and W.Wooillisail,
briabigli, 1 orkahlre, /nicer's.

SCOTCH SHOVIGSTRATIONS.
TH.1145 llnnontgos. Ulaktow, woollen cloth warehouseman,
Dec. t, at the Vacuity Hall. Mango..
ILLIAN T 0111111.11.1. (cleansed , Humelburgh, hair cloth manu-
facturer, line. 3. at lamella and 14011.4 Dooms. urgh.
Ileum Hit.tga, hut .erglen, grocer, Dec, 6, at the Faculty Hall,
tilataam.
lalta mAcannosit. Absurder, lankemper, Dec. 4, at the 1514-
tits Hold, laymen.

'RAW Entillignirc.
COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.—ICov. 2G.

&Wisp at Nisi Priori ut Weatssiuster.—(Before Lord Oblef
Justice Cockburn and a Common Jury.)
QUEEN V. PEARCE.

In this ease, after our report left yesterday,
Mr. Henry James addressed the jury on the part of
the defewlant, and, without imputing any intentional nits-
represeutation to Mrs. Grundy and her servant, he ()potential
that owing to the lapse of time their recollection of what
took place at the lodgings was inaccurate, and ought not to
he relied num. The learned counsel stated that the defen-
dant had always borne a high and exempl.ry character, and
commented upon the improbability of his imperilling it for
the sake of a debt of only a few pounds.
A considerable number of witnesses who were called
bore strong testimony to the deteadant's honour, truthful
ness and houesty.
The learned J wigs having summed up,
The jury found • verdict of Uwillp, but recommended
him to the merciful consideration of the court in consequence
of his previous good diameter.
The Lord Chief Justice said he would postpone passing
judgment until the points upon which he had reserved leave
to move bad been determined, but the defendant's recogni-
sauces would have to be doubled-2004 himself and two
sureties of 100/. each.

Dr. Phillinioro (with whom was Dr. 4pioks) begged that
in Una cue, instmoi of tashiug ■n attachment, the taxation
might be matlebeforthand.

file Court—No ; I shall adhere to the prattle*. You
have bad an ample opportunity to request a toiatiue of the
costa in order to their payment; but you only make the
application when the order of the court is asked to be
enfoionl. Ueai.lea, I should il,:ua toe geutletuan would
bare less dithoulty iu Mviug S ority than in paying the
money down.
On the motion of Dr. Witinhey, the court condemned
the husband in the whim of this appliesitiou.
ORAT r. OBAY AND THE DCLEN.II PROCTOR (nrrenvienro.)
In this cue, after • decree oisi had been made at the exit
of the wife on the ground of bigamy and adultery, the
Queen's Proctor had intervened, and chithe parties
with collusion and Mrs. Gray with adultery. Au applica-
tion liad then been made by the petitioner to dismiss her
petition.
Sir F. Slade, Q.C., now opposed the motion, and contended
that it would be contra bonus mores to allow attempts to
impose upon the court to be made without exposure.
Sir C. Cresswell said be would dismiss the petition, but
he should order an entry to be made to the effect that the
court did it pmprio viers, for want of answer to the Queen's
Proctor's allegation. It would then be fur the crown to
consider whether it would not pursue the course threatened
by the Lord Chancellor when Attorney•Grueral, namely, to
indict the parties for conspiring to chest the court.
Dr. Wembey was ready to admit the charge of adultery,
but he dolled the collusion. He would therefore withdrew
his motive, and ask the court fur nine to plead to the
Queea'a Proctor's allegation.
The Court gave the petitioner a week to plead.
BRIKILET V. BERRZLIY.

This was & petition for restitution of oonjupl rights, pro-
moted by the Hon. G. C. thentley Biwkeley. Yrs.
Berkeley denied that she had wilful!y withdrawn from oo-
habitatioo, sod asked for • judicial aspiration on the
grounds of cruelty and adultery.
The Court ordered the cam to be tried before a special
jury.

POTTS V. POTTS AND BATEMAN.

In this ease the petitioner claimed 3,000/. from the co-
respundeot as Images.
Dr. 13pinks asked for leave to plead the Statute of Limi-
tations as against the claim for damages, the last act of
adultery charged being so long ago as 1833.
The Court granted Leave on payment of the costs of ap-
plication.

brief, and uked him (witness) to lend him 10s. to pay hie
expenses, which lie did ; aid on the prisoner's return he
soil it was all right, Mr. Todd had received the mosey. He
had since ascertained, however, that .Mr. Todd bud never
received the money ; and that Metaled of the name being
Tood, of 95, Bennie-street, as the prisoner bad told him
to direct the letter, it war Mr. Todd, of 75, Newgate•strect.
Mr. Mitchell, c..bicr At Blessie. Glyn. huh, said the
cheque pioduced, siesta Win. Toed fur 201, was paid to
the party who presented it, but lie could not say if it
was the primmer.
Wm. Buoy, au officer of the Bath constabulary, said that
be apprehended the prisoner at Bath, and told him he was
charged with forging and uttering a cheque for 201. on
Messrs. Glyn and Co., and be said, " Well, Grass will have
to prove it. I can show that I bad his authority to receive
it. lam now in a condition to meet the use."

Mr. Goodman asked the reason the prisoner hail been
sent to London, when lie was apprehended in Batb.
Mr. Hughes, the superiotemleot of the Bath police, said
the prisoner had been taken before the magistrates at Bath,
but the clerk of the court thought that as Mr. Board was
instructed to prosecute, and some of the witnesses, as well
as the forged document itself, were iu Londou, it was beet
to send tho prisoner to be examined before his lordship.
The Lord Mayor said be could not authorise any money to
be paid for expenses of bringing the witnesses from Bath.
The prisoner was then remanded.