The Express.
London, England, 1868-12-24 00:00:00

--

THE SX.ritESS,

ra'surig blyet 4aloy
grway llse
157.Lalre elwwwd
-
with the IN at Brighten ; nor 'ma is so mod
as that of lades whoa nee DryakAlN
sad lasi as ••"7 • As ke nMw.
this rip blo2ilbfr dawn. Meant, %id& yawns's' las
tHwelle for the 00•14.:Sal at York, Least ONIPIIS 4104
Molded clollell Ha even after lblettnair
**valid ifek • par 6. • • as there wai ma/4
1••••1:ean illessdard Bearer the AdeentegaVe
Itmetklets eat up wen worse on the Kneveseake the,
in his second Nee atlesektes, Ong
_manlely ma f iidta
to Linty Dewhast, Matilda, in the mile
Ohnereek, • perileresmes Mat was jest toe here to be true,
wr bow muchlisteer weight thee make Lady Dewherst thaa
her then stable comparsion Dryed ? Doncaster, neverthe-
less, Weed we or two riddles, if the results broiled
back the old doubts as to the essillenne of
Belledress sad Rriliworth. who each suffered de-
test, and in the two principal events of the meeting. The
Champagne dose was SO* reoevered from
that
many
the week, for Mures was about the tail would be
tboneht of as likely to heat Debar= after her two bed
forintiness, and it was hard band an menu for the de-
throned Zing. His jockey wasblamer of OVUM ; then
again he was " very big," and the d enemy crowed
over the idea that he wee a env and • roarer, end every-
thing else that was bed. Matters certainly, amused a
serious completion when he was sent home of
Wal-
lies his other engegements,on the knowleige of whictiMr.
Simile had Eviliworth from Newmarket to run
for the mile Bwespstakeshere again the
backers of " public form " were made to died
tears of woe. The Newmarket pet was actually
beaten by the twice disgraced Therweldese, end
lost the second money to Crocus by some lengths,
for which his rather lusty appearance was not snakiest
excuse. The pair in front a him were, in truth, just
ripe at last, on thorns would not have cantered home be-
fore the highly-tried Poinsettia, Melody. and Lady Mel-
bourne filly, for the Fond' Makes ; and it was only her
excellent "second" that saved the yellow jacket from
utter disgrace at Doncaster. Those who had any idea
what %Wren% could do with her had to rest satiated
with the merit she displayed with Thorwaldeen, who quite
recovered the good character be lore at York, by not only
tu tables on Lady Dewhurst, but by beating her
and many lengths. The letter had run
recood in a large field for the Donington Handicap, but
received 13111. and such a beating born Lumley therein,
that the Biithton hero went home from the north the
ecknowled equal, if not the superior. of anything of
his year. Only moderate animals—such as Misadveature,
St. Mungo, said I/siker—were east up_ by the minor
events: and as Leaky was not in the Derby the most
hopeful began to think the Blue Ribald winner had yet
to make its appearance on the turf. Had the idea of the
race becoming null and void been mooted jest now rawly
backers would have been delighted with the prospect,
for most of the money invested by them ap-
peared " dead," and they could hardly have anticipated
plat, after such stars as Wild Oats and Pero Gooses w-
rested on the horizom lielladrum should do something to
rival them, suit go into winter quarters the premier Derby
favourite after all.
How he did this, and how the " form " stood at the
time of the ream. mast be told in my next and OM-
eluding letter concerning the crack two-year-olds of Pled.
—1 am, Sm., Msrsou.

. •

THURSDANAIVICIIIINO,, DECE/ABBR 14, 186 b.

&dip ,

437 TRZ PRIV Y
. I*.t, ) IL Clie.-01."'
(Edon the of York, Lod Chelmedord, Led
arks and Sir J. Ootvils.)
m iltranerire 111 IMS gr. ALIA= MIVAL one, *50121
tiatettiOneernt—areoaram DMMINS.
This was an aypeel_fran the Arches Oniet um to the
Abashed* orresel as it. Alta. Helhorloo, and
eigittodlshr aggioleted by timer
math dated
case wee lest
Came, when hie but In the
absence el the Lord the Eglrodho' pof York
was et tee bead el the wormers
On the present wore the homed round on both
sides wine in atlondsiess, and Mr. W. M. Isms, Q.C.,
made his smarms, for the id time at the bar, melees
to his elevation as ilee-Chasselker. J=szas
P
given in another ease Ulm "MAY v. .
was caged on, and the evert was mask weerdele lasi
Westbury, who sat with the noesebees et the aommilese
when the case was heard,_ was not in ahandenes.
Lord Cairns delivered the judgment of the court, read.
beg from a printed
.tegy. Es said the ease of " Mar-
tin .. Itatkonoekis' esemessesid Were the Bieber of
Landon, and was, mine the previsions of the Clergy
Act, sent by the bishop to the wort of
reeirri Archbishop of Canterbury foe trial in the trot
instance, and beviiii bees heard before the
Judge of the Arches Court Ina decree made on
the 28th of March lad. Mr. Madrensitsie. the dirk in
holy orders against whom those moeidiess were directed,
was charged with four oieneee- embed the laws eoclesi-
astical--11 Elevation of the pease end cup, end kneeling
2, using lighted mediae ; 3, ming isms@ ; and 4, mixing
water with the wine in the selemniation ot the Holy
Communion. The learned Judge of the Arches Courts by
his decree, sustained the third and teerth of these charges,
and admonished Mr. Madieseshie to abstain for the
future from the use et Immo and from mixing
water with the wine. Against that part of the
decree there was no appeal. As to the Ind charge,
Mr. Mechem:chit while admitting the elevation of
the consecrated elements, pleader" that be had dis-
continued the practice before the Welted= of the suit.
The learned Judge theiefore admonished Mr. Meskonochie
not to recur to the practice, bat es to the sheep of
kneeling and prostratiNg himself belie* the esineerated
ek nests. the joested kedge (Mr Hebert Phallism) hell
that if Mr. lladmsoolde bad mommitted say error In
that respect It was ens which shoeld not form the subject
of a windmill proesm&on,
_but should be reigned to the
bishop, in order that he ght exercise his diserseica. The
ralipromoter (Mr. Martin) wpealed from the latter pert of
creLien of the leerwd judge on that charge, and he
also complained in his appeal that the defendant
was not ordered to pay the mats of the suit.
The episodic= raised ley the appeal were very
fully and ably argued, and their lordships had now
to state their reasons for the advice which they pro.
posed humbly to offer to her Majesty. His Inedship
considered the charge of kneeling before the consecrated
elements, and stated the charge and answer, and after
reading the rubric and the directions on the prayer of
ontecratit n' proceeded to slate that their lordships an-
tral tailed nu doubt en the construction of the rubric, that
the priest was intended to continue in one potters during
the In ever, and not to change from standing, or kneelinr,
se vice verse; and it appeared to there equally certsin
that the priest wax intended to stand, and not to kneel.
'I heir lordships thought that the words " rtinding before
the lei lc" applied to the whole sentence, and they be-
lieved that it was made apparent by the consideration that
acts were to be done by the priest before the people as the
rape proceeded (such as taking the paten and chali
lido his kande, bivekiug the breed, anal laying his band on
the variant weed.) which could only be done in the atti-
tede t I standing. That being 'newt? forelehips' opinion the
puler construction of the rubric, it was clear that the
terjoueent by the posture or change of posture during
the payer Lad violated the rubric and committed an
(.14111:41 within the mewling of the 13th and lith Car. 11.,
cap. 4. sections 2, 17 and 24, taken in connection with the
Itt th, cap. 2, and puni-hatde by admonition,
wider the 23rd section of the latter statute. His lordship
adverted to the argument used, and to. be said, the very
trained and elaborate judgment of the Dean of Arches on
the subject, and further that it was a matter for the dis-
cretion of the bishop. On the whole their lordships were
of opinion that the charge against the respondent of
breeding during the prayer of consecration had been
sustain; d. and that he should be admonished. not only
not to recur to the elevation of the paten and the cup,
pleaded in the 3rd article, but also to abstain for the
future from kneeling or prostrating himself before the
consecrated elements during the_ prayer of consecration,
as the Fame article also pleaded. The other charge
involved in the appeal was that of wing lighted candles
on the communion table, when such readiest were not
wanted for the purpose of giving light. Lord Cairns next
read the charge and answer on "lighted candles," and
the point was ceremony or ornaments. The Dean of
Arches considered that the use of lighted candles was
ceremony. The subject of ornaments wan settled by
the Committee in the ease of " Weeterton v. Liddell;'
and the Council of Trent had exprewed its iminicer and
Dr. Donne preached on the point. The use of lighted
candies us a ceremony was prohibited h Queen Eliza-
beth'. Ace of 17iiiformity.. The judge of the
emit of Arches was of opinion that lights were ordered
by injunctions, having Mendable authority, and that they
were Vats(' on the table " For the signification that Christ
is the light of the world." After referring to the low on
the subject, and the rubric on ornameuts. his lordship
raid lighted candle' were not "ornaments" within
the words of the rubric, for they were not preseriMel
by the authority of parliament mentioned in the
first Bayer-boa dr, nor was the injunction of 1117
the authority of parliament within the meaning of the
vubno- they were not subsidiary to the service, for they
did not aid or facilitate —Muth less were they neoessary
to tl e service, nor could a operate and independent orna-
ment previously in we be said to be eourstent with a
rubric which was silent as to it, and whil, by necessary
implication, abolished whet it slid not retain. After some
!either remarks on the tame subject, his lordship said tM.ir
lordships would humbly advise her Majesty that the
charge as to lights al,O had been sustained, and that the
reerendent should be admonished for the future to
abstain from the use of them as pleaded in the article.
His I.4lship concluded-All the charges against the rt-
Tendert having Leen thus established, their lordships
see no reason why the usual C01140(11:eDCO as to costs
theuld not follow. and they will advise her Majesty th it
the respeudent should pay to the appellant the costa in
the court below, and of this appeal.