The Express.
London, England, 1850-06-18 00:00:00

____ --
Maas Paw o
Palos aad WILLIAM Faros, New-road, Middle- to
s
an, ireasnanna.
Is
Joins Caum. Neigannet, Ci.y, victualler. ao
N tsz. HEWS, Beth. ailvereasith. 23
JANOS DOMINT, lies, Ilnisenr, Boatsessishire, COMM.. IS
BANTAMIN Snows!, Newiaa, Ideatinsernine, ocan 31
Mffik At.
le• @carat sitQtriurtitertows. le
Lula aud Snows Limn/molt, Glanair, narehassta. g
Taman HAMILTON, Glautow, asaaufactarer. so
Josue Baartss, Dundee, baker. so

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
THIS DAY.

ARCHES COURT.
/Imam Bra IL 1. Poor, Err.

00111 AM V. TM' BISHOP 01 EXITZI. ITit
I. this este, it wiU be reentlected that on last court-day 44
Dr. Addams, ea the part of the Bishop of Exeter, promised so'
that his lordship would comply with the monition this day. 81
if so proceedings were taken is the other courts in the mean too
time. Oa the may being called, to
The Registrar said he had been served with a rule treat r.
the Court of Exchequer to show cause why the monition 100
iron out of this court, calling upon the Bishop of Exeter to 17
send In the lettere of institutioa to thekvicarage of Brampford 20
Spoke, should not be set aside.
No person appearing for either the bishop or Mr. Gorham, 121
the cause wee ordered to stand over.
Ordered to stand over till next terms accordingly. St

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
THIS DAY.

BOW-STREET.

Cll4lOl or EMBSZZLIII2;;TZW: Smart was charged
with embezzlement various sums of money, amounting to r.
upwards of 1561., the property of Mr. Samuel George Fotd, it
solicitor, of No. 8, Heariettaetreet, Covent-garden.
Mr. Ford deposed that the prisoner was a clerk in his em- at. I
ploy, and was in the receipt of a good salary. Witness's son 9
conducted the banners, and he was in the habit of giving the
prisoner cheques and other moneys for the disburrements of 54
the office, that daty having been appropriated to the prisoner, in
who kept a cash-book of his own for that pur;ine. Witness 34
produced the easL-book, which was is the prisoner's hand- St. I
writing, and read several entries therefrom—On August the 9.1
6th, 14149, in the suit of Bruce v. Walker, paid tor brief, 20
21.4 e. 6d.; consulted-at and fee for clerk, 11. 7.. August a
6th a similar sum was paid in another suit. There were so
other entries ie which the prisoner had sat forth that he had so
paid Mr. Parker, the barrister, various sums es fees for • 20
motion is the suit of Bruce v. Walker. Witness bad 20
made inciairies, and found that none of these fees had C. ,
been paid. The discovery of the embezzlement had been as '
med. by the examination of the prisoner's cash-book, sad io
the one belonging to Mr. Ford, jun. The prisoner had si
paid 71. Its. for folios of writing, sad had entered the same at-1
is his book. The amount had been entered in Mr. Ford's 50 I
book, and the prisoner had afterwards altered the figure 7to St '
9. This led to a further examination of the accounts, and st.l
it was proved after a hasty calculation that the prisoner bad 20
appropriated to his own um the saut of 1561. Winne+ said 20
he sent for the rinser and gave Mx into custody, and he 5
offered so explanation to the charge. He merely said that /1.
the differuca is the books respecting the folios must have 2;
bees as error.
The prisoner said he was unprepared with his defame, 22
u he was only taken into custody last night. lti
Mr. Ford said the books had not been thoroughly exa- 20,
mined ; and when they were so, he expected to find name- ,11,
rota other cases against his. st!!
The prisoner was remanded for • week. tell