The Express.
London, England, 1868-11-14 00:00:00

woe. is ritualism (load theme) and. gen-
tlemen, I wish to add this : them may be
many things that are good in the way of ex-
term' observance, bat gees with regard to some of three
things which are Roca greaten* oat madam ought to be
oberved in introduces( them to the use albedo wbo have
not rives their worst to then, and wbo are not pre-
Ferri to use Mesa for a bessficial purpose. (Gasses.)
fle Apostle rays, " Let all things be done to Will-
adieu ,• let all things be dose which build up
the Christian man." Let to take that for our rule.
There Is an opinion that is many owes the Wandering of
mimic in churthes, and ether things that probably may be
eery simple, very Mamas; mid very beselcial in them-
selves, may have • very bad ilea Wi6dlll Istrodurel either
contrary to the will of the congregation. Cr when the
congregation are not in • Mete to tura them to
spiritual ammat. sad, therefore, I eonfess my
great mine ty is that congregations in these
nutters should leant to rueogaise and admit
their so that they should be able
to defend throneless against that sole sal auto-
cratic act of the which ‘`!l often may be due
to the best, the bide.f. and tie seism motives ea his
part, bet which, the seise limn ought sot kr be ea-
templed exmO with the eseenneoses of the Cluistion cm-
egatioa. ((leers) And now, gentlenisse having maid that,
1 Slunk 1 have given an explimation of my general opt-
ukase, and I am bound to look to the TOJ VI 4of the
existing government, whatever that may be. This oar-
taialy no quistion of party. It would be • tarible
mister tune 11 it berme one--if quatioas coneruing the
iutenial doctrine and discipline of the church of England
ever became questions of party. Ray on it, the day that
termer so, will be the day you may bid farewell to an
Lope of a iatisfactory settlement. (Cheers.) We
must watch for opportunities of limo au 1 cir-
cumstance, and must have the opinion of the
government and of the heeds of the church. I have
endeavoured to describe to you theu=ral circumstances
under which my couduct will be • and I venture to
think it is your betel that I should, as far as I could, en-
deavour to enure a faithful apOostim of that prin-
ciple. We are here to ask your suffrage. as Bopp noes
of the liberal party, as representing it in this
division; not as having provoked this emoted, but
as Laying refused, as far as depends on us, to
acquiesce in au arrangement attempted by our op-
p enenta to shut us out entirely from the representation
of the division. That stands an admitted fact. We don't
believe it is denied in any quarter. I was until two days
ago your member ; for my unworthy oeuduct rn
parliament, my opponents claim that I should
be shut out from being your member, and
my friends meet this claim, . thnt I shall be shut
out from being your member, in the only way in which
under the tinned elections in great coostituenues it m
be met— by fairly matching Mr. Grenfell and myself a mind
Mr. Turner and Mr. Cross. It is they who provoke and
invite thelettle. It is we who, being invited mil provoked,
do not flinch from it. (Cheer..) It is you who mild
decide which way the issue will go. (Cries of "We
will.") And now I want to know what are the grounds
on which your votes are asked for the party that c ills
itself conservative. The last thirty-five years have been
prase marked beyond any previous period of British
history for centuries peat by the active and beneficent
character of their legislation. Of that there is no doubt.
To whom is that legislation due? Who have been the pro.
pelting, and who have been the retarding party.? Who have
been the proposing, and who have been the rousting party
'St hy the proposing party have been the liberal party, or
else they have been meters of the non-ervative party to
which I myself, under air A. Pell, had the honour to
belong ; and we, for our misdeeds is proposing gored mea-
ning for the country, were turned out of office in 1816,
and gradually found teat the so-called conservative party,
being determined on what we thought bad measures, and
we being resolved to take what we thought good ones, the
remit is that we stand where we do; I speak now of the
literal party ; I draw no distinction between myself and
others of the liberal party, except this, that I may wish
that I had been with than sooner. (Loud cheers.)
But at any rate. it is 26 years since Host all credit and
character. Even when I was in the government of Sir It.
Feel I was looked upon as the most dangerous man it
contained, for my allegiance to the oorn laws was euspecte 1
hem the lint moment that I opened my mouth on the
subject in parliament, and not altogether without reason.
sow, gentlemen, you have got this issue to decide. and
barely we can go to the issue upon facts in this matter in
the sperit.stirring song which you mug after I entered this
place, in which occurs the line—
When Oladatene's rearehing brae.

Gentknsen, I have marched borne to-day. (Cheers.)
Tllu spot upon which I stand, and thereon fo ir
miles to the north of it, are the home of my chihl-
hood, and, notwithstanding all that has transpired,
it is still to a great degree the home of my heart.
(Renewed cheering) When this *Aunty we, divided, it
a ould not have been for me to call upon the generoas
energy of my friends to support me ins helpless task, bet
if they thought the battle could be blight with
hope, nothing would induce me to recede tram the
soil upon which I was bore, and to fight
the battle in any other part of England. (Cheers) 'fee
right hon. gentleman then went on to contrast the public
policy of the liberal party with that of the tarries during
the past generation, and appealed to his hearers to say
what the tones had to show on their side. Almost the
only measure which they pretended to depend upon W 44
the passing of the Factory Acts. It was totally untrue to
ray that that 121.11114:74 had been paeeed by the conserva-
tive or pretectionist party. It never was &party question
at all. Be refereed to the attacks which had been male
al on Mr. Bright for his opposition to the Factory Acts,
arid spoke of the calumnies which had been heaped upon
Mr. Bright's head by the conservative party. Three
vs era ago (continued Mr. (Iladetene) Mr. Bright was
more paraded as the bugbear of the day than he is now.
Whenever we in 1866 alleged that our views and proposals
will respect to retie= were not only constitutional but
mode: ate to time last degree, the sewer always wad
tut they are aproved by Mr. Bright. Mr. Bright 11:45
s. ce pied them." What was the reason, then, for holding
IT Mr. Bright as the object of terror to the nation: It
was this, that Mr. Bright bad years before stated east iu
his spinsou household suffrage was the true basis
of the! suffrage; and these very men, through toe
year 1866, dinned in our ears from day to day and hour
to hour a reproach of some sort of supposed agreement
with Mr. Jingle, who, I mutt observe, had with grail
mcdtration foregone much of his own opinion in order to
actept what he thought • practical and honest,
though a limited measure. But the meritice which
he made would not avail. The constitutionalism
of this conservative party was such that they could not
endures government which did not anathematise a mass,
who hard been guilty at some erne of his life of proposing
Ileum hold suffrage. These very men who bad deuoureied
us and him amid his proposal, and said that our pro-ood
would cud in hie, and was therefore to be condemned, sax
me uthsafter are found adopting and themselves making
the pro; teal of Mr. Bright, claiming credit for its
authorship, and vindicating to themselves the
honour of originality, and affecting to be surprised when
other men are doubtful whether to them is due the
honour of a conscious adoption of the principle involved
.in that measure. (Cheers.) Gentlemen, that may appe sr
lethal* to be mere retroepect, but what is history
(Heim hear.) It is from history that we are to draw
the lessons which are to guide us in the future.
Who in 1866 denounced Mr. Bright, and as beesuse we had
proposed the measure that he had accepted, are the very
lame persons who now, even to producing nausea, are de-
nouncing Mr. Bright again because he is party to the
measure with rest ect to the Irish church that we have
proposed. (Hear, hear.) Now, I want to know what
security have you from them, that they will
not in 1869 repeat the game which they played in IS
(e Hese" and cheers.) If the resistance of leed has
been followed up by the resistance of 1864. why are not
the odd numbers to agree with ono another like the even.
and why is not the terxiversatisn of 1867 to be followed
by • Us tergiversation in 1869 Gentlem al. I
have never said, with regard to oortain mea-
MUM, you rummy not, perhaps, if you think fit to
adopt the male of proceeding, get a.s much from
the tory party. or whatever it is from us. If
you wid only let the people come to the verge of sed tion
through discontent—if you will make them exasperated
through abuse and alserustetl through mistrust until they
begin to threaten the law and the constitation —I have
No doubt that from tories each us these, who after
all are but effeminate in their composition
(a laugh)—you may ext act from their fears
and from their hopes, from their (urn of violence
and from their hopes and love of °Mend power, as
much upon particular subjects as you can have from a%
(Laughter and cheers.) If you like the country to begs).
veined in that way—if such be the will of the English
nation, let the English nation say so. The right
honourable gentleman next proceeded to n
the Irish ehurehtpisatioa, anderpresed his belief Math°
changes which he reposed to effect would relieve that
religious body from a false and hateful position. reel
would open. the way tl a more salutary development of
those energies which had too long remained dormant.
Re concluded with an earnest appeal to the electors of
South West Lancashire to rally round the liberal candi-
dates, and support them in the great undertaking in which
they had embarked. The right hon. gentleman resumed
his seat amid loud cheers, having spoken nearly an hoar
and a half.

Mr. Gladstone is inia visit to Mr. T. P. Hey-
wood, Norrimgreeni Liverpool, for a taw=
" I WAS suffering licitly a few ago from
severe paint about tie • neye and eacemine muskiest'
in the beck accompanied with nauseous Mamie, moaned
to my bed, when a friend who bad long known as ex.
penenced greet good trees your Pain Killer, brought am
• bottle, which I and with the beet reeotte, and am now
tree from ell pains and sichnetm—A. itimiassm, Wood.
dde. Aberdeen. Oct. 24, 1867.—T0 Perry Davis It Boa,
17, Southwapass-row, Holborn. W.C."—lhavW
Tni ILUiDIACTURE op WATONNS AND CSLOOKS.
most and laelreilivo Mae walk SloolOWs WON?.
withAlew
imatiebriricksadi dta
SI sad*
oami of oaf
iisZites
No eat emeenre rag moo eV.
dom. or the Dolosloo,are woolee4 So Wool for tioomfoos
Ow watch adeptod fee /beer wee. and MVO M Newt to Noonwith re duet Fahey. Mr. Hosewh, who bolds the eppotstioont to
Me Ilion. of Mahe, ...Me Ole yewer*eaaphlet to any oddroos
e on r”oeipt
of two tootaeo annum and wo too Arme reawmatzwod
to the &Obi of the iotehigwerasr.-14401ont„j it