The Express.
London, England, 1850-06-22 00:00:00

RAW inttilisma.

ouiZ OF LORDS.—YESTEIDAIN
The noble arid learned lords proem mere Lard Brougham,
Lord Venders, and Lord de Mauler.

CIIII'PEIDALZ.6 DITOICI BILL.

The houss,aitiels-s;Sair some— appeal cow :proceeded to
read this &Porte bill swami tie,.

Lord Brougham occupied the chair.
This CMS CUM under the considwation of the house to day.
The petitioner, who was au attorney's clerk, rued in form.
pauperis.
Counsel and the parties having been called to the bar,
Lord Brenham said he had carefully looked through the
evidence is this case which had been given before that bouse
upon the lest occasion, and be had found that the neces-
sary proofs, which had upon the previous examinations had
been wanting, hid been supplied by the witnesses which
then boss prodansii. Under these circumstances, therefore,
be should recommend that house to read this bill a second
time. The petitioner had not only been in a state of cons-
waties povetty, but he would unhappily 'NU to have
been aa unfortunate in a selection of a wile as he had been
unsuccessful in his pecuniary pursuits. Taking all those
ciretunstenees into consideration, he would move that this
bill be reed a second time.

Tie bill eraesecordially read a snood time, mad ordered
to be committed.

Th. hoar then adjourned.

EQUITY COURTIL—TUTEHDAY.
awns Tu VICOZOJOSCILLOI OF r.VOIJiI.D,

CI:UMW 7. BAIL- Oa-

risna.—Arronivisarr OF NEw TErsnr.s.

A claim had been filed in this eses, under the 11th clause
of the first order of April last, for the appoiatmeat of new
trustees, and the defendant having appeared to the writ of
sammons trued thereon, the plaintiff moved this day, cal-
ling epos the defendant to show cause why the relief claimed
should not be greeted. The claim stated that the plaintiff was
interested nadir tr.e will of Sir Alan Chambre, in certain treat
property therein mentioned, and that the defendants, who
were four in number, were the personal representatives, and
also devisees, of the trust estates, nadir the will of Thomas
Maude, the last surviving trustee of suet. property, and that
the power in the said will to appoint new trustees could not he
executed, and that the plaintiff, Alan Chambre, therefore
claimed to have new trustees appointed of the said trust
property in the place of the said Thomas Maude, deceased,
or of the said lour defendants his personal representatives
and devisees in trust.
Mr. C. Young appeared in support of the claim, and
produced the will of Sir Alan Cbandure, which contained a
proviso that in ease the trustees thereby appointed, or any of
them, or any soseerdine trustees or trustee of the said trust
premises, or any of them to be nominated and appointed by
virtue of the said viwer, or their or any of their heirs, exe-
cutors, or administraton, should die, or be desirous of being
discharged from the trusts, that it should be lawful for the
surviving or imatinaing trustees*, trustee for the time being
of the mete *rut premises respectively, or the executors or
administrators of the last surviving cr continuing trustee
with the c•dieent and approbation in writing of his nephew
and niece, Thomas and Mary Chetah'', or the survivor o
them, and after the decease of such survivor, at the discretion
of the said surviving, or continuing trustees or trustee, by
any deed or deeds in writing, &c., to appoint new trustees.
It appeared that the power could not be exercised by reason
of the testator's nephew and niece being both dead, and
their wowed coosequently unattainable. After their de-
cease the testator had directed the power to be exercised at
the discretion of the surviving or continuing trustees, het
the movie*, trustee being now dead the question was wits-
Um the power could be ozonised by the defendants, the
personal representatives of such last surviving trustee.
Mr. Dickinson appeared for the defendants.
The Viee-Chancellor, after reading the terms of the power
of appointing new trustees, contained in the will of Sir Alan
Chamber, said he was of opinion that the power could now
be ixereieed by the defendants, the personal representatives
of the last trustee, and that an order should homed' without
reference to the Master for the appciatment of new trustees,
having regaid to the power in the testator's will.
Mr. Young than suggested that special leave ought to
have bees gives ander the "lath order to file this claim.
The Viee-Chancellor said be agreed with al on,
end would, therefeen, direct the claim to be out of
the day's paper, sad give leave for it to be filed as • *Nisi

[lt will Do am by OM above woo dist point of low of
woo imprison was dooliod upon s dein mike the sow
ordoro, at ea *spoon of *boot U., wboa osier lie elf .72.
as of bill sad samor, tbo woos wadi Imo olooodol 60f1

COURT OF QUM'S BENCEL—YzerrsapAy.
SITTUNS AT NM NMI AT WINATITITIIML-1111.0A3 Loss Cam
Jounce CATETIZILL ass A aracau JUST.
Tun Dunn or Batraswies It. Kossuth.
Tale was es amiss brought by ***Stiff egoist the dr
hooks% one of the registered proprieties of the Mos, for an
alined libel.
The Dela se Basessick rocketed his own gees la psrss,
and Mr. Sanest the defandeat, was ably reresen by Sir
' F. Thesiger grad Mr. MSS.
The wildest matter of the alleged libel ens a leafs/ article
which appeared is the Ihne is the 28th Jens, 1849, ens-
seating is a trial is shiest:art, a few days psevieualy, of sa
sides for as alleged libel brosialit iloseareeent plaintiff
waist the prosieter el the Weekly • .
The Duke of Branevriek Tle en rem whiek he mad
to the jury, metested the eireastatheest sada whisk he
had tlicught it his duty, la Jaw last year, to festinate
had
lawaseillage egaiset tke proprfotee cif the Weekly
Lis !ens whisk appealed is that Par-
ma es so as September, 1830, Wastage years
bells the These &mica's, of width the duke coos-
pithead es Itheliews„ were of considerable length, statthg,
magi ether Offer, that he (the Sake of lintaserish) had
been athdled MS hie demisions because awee a tyraat,l
sad bed entesged the lieMip of his subjects ; that be bad
trampled is the laws end bre* 'silty of other ems, which
bed se mush incensed sad Irritated his etthista, that they
had spelled him from his dukedom gad tuned It. paw.
The libel of which he now couplathed wee na esti& wins
is the Met I. reference to the trial ysisM lite Weakly
Dis. sod which be alleged and enteggented
the .ous matter contained in the Dieratek is respect of
whiffs he Ist year °bathed a verdict and a sesiderable
most of damages.
Ilir F. Th er the eddressed the Joey an behalf of the
delhadeat, 11. right of the mu of this country
to emsseat ups the political sadas of posies shamed as
the saint& we..
Witness were then called to skew that another mottos
foe the seas libel was pending against Mr. Young, who was
connoted with the paper in question, and that the de-
had's% knew aotblag of the publication of the alleged libel,
and had nothing to do with the saaaagsseat of the paper.
Lord Campbell the. briefly sussed up the see to the
jury, who, after a few minutes,' deliberation, returned a
verdict for the plaintiff—damages, se shilling.

COURT OF BANIERUPTCY.-TESTIZDAY.
Race" N.. Ocomaraoina VANE.
IN NZ HAMM AND BISIAL-IN is HAWAII AND

--- ----- --.
81L1T...-CMAROU 01 FRAUD.

This was the last azantination mooting under the smell
bankruptcies of Harness and Mabry, wit° wens demribsd as
warehousemen, of Aldszmanbory, and Wm. Bilby, wars.
honssaenn, of Bahian. . _

,
Mr. V aa Sandan, ler the enigma, opposed the passing of
the bankrupts, sad contended that their trading had been
characterised by fraud ben beginning to end. The firm of
Hansa@ and Gilley began business in August, 1848, at Anti
as commission agents, bat they soon began to trade on their
own amount. Neither of them had any capital; Harness
had 1201., but he owed upwards of 2001., sad
was consequently insolvent; he undertook to produce
MOM capitol, as did Bliley, to the extent of 6001.,
bat it did not appear that any had ever been brought in.
They carried on the concern until November, 1849, when
Bilby retired. Bialey, who had been a wine-merchant in
Hand-court, Holborn, then joined Harness, and they agreed
to indemnify Bixby against the debts of the former punter-
ship, which were about 4,9001. The assets realised were
9,6001, and Bisiey sad Hunan received out of those assets
5741. ISM than they actually paid on account of those liabili-
ties. The period of trading occupied be the bankrupts was
from November 12, 1849, to the 19th of March in the present
yeu. The balance-Meet ehowed debts and liabilities to the
extent of 4,8001., and alleged smote to the amount 0(1,3001.
The forme item was comet, but the latter to a great extant
imaginary, for the whole of the assets realised only amounted
to 3201. The charges comprised nearly every species of
offence known to the bankruptcy laws—tales entries in the
books, fraudulent disposition of property, forced sales, ex-
travagant expenditure, reckless trading, obtaining golds
when in a state of hopeless iosolvency, &c. In the four
months over which the Miaow-shut extended, Sisley drew
out of the 00111 C ra 4251. The node in which he accounted
' for the diabarsemant of this sum was singular 1001. was set
' down for dinners in the city, fares of omnibus bl. 10s., and
a considerable sum was also charged for " recreation," stab-
ilise, &o. There was a deficiency in the cash account of
312/., which Harness accounted for by saying that he drew
out of the firm 2741., and Bliley 2391., "being cash taken out
various dew which they omitted to enter." Upon the trading
tisasections of the four months there was no profit, but a loss,
upon goods bought and sold, of 3741. The business expenses
daring the same time were 6871, and the sum drawn oat by
the two bankrupts, 9.511. The manner in which the books
were kept was entirely unsatisfactory, and the chugs of false
entries was tot rebutted. One of the very wont features in
their tickler career was that they obtained large quantities
of geode from respectable wholesale house+, and immediately
sold them to " job-ehope" at a great sacrifice. The solicitor
tar the magnets was about entering into the various details,
in order to show that the bankrupts ought not to be allowed
to pus their last examination, when
The Commissioner said it was perfectly clear that these
men could not be allowed to pass He could not believe •
single figure in their accounts, and the balance was no indi-
cation whatever of the manner in which the bankrupts had
earned on their trading. The cue seemed to be a very
fraudalent one, and be felt bound to adjourn the bankrupts'
last 'mainlines sine die, without protection,

MIDDLESEX SESSIONS.—YzsTraDAT.
BAYOU Ma SALSA= ADAM., AND • 131:NCII or MAMMA/
ITALURD I AZT CONDUCT OF A JURYMAN.

Theodore Rammenaers and It Hin4m, merchants,
is the City of London, end the former baying place* of
barium at Alexandria and Hsttetdare, surrendered" to Isle
their trial upon an indictment charging them with having
welted • police-offs or in the execution of his duty, with
Latest to prevent their lawful apprehension.
In opming the ease to the jury, Mr. Parry said that the
Marge against the defendants was one of • very serious
description, and was greatly aggravated by the fact of their
being persons of h•gb station in society; as all would agree,
that it any offence were committed by persons of education
and of standing, it was of a far more serious nature than if
committed by an ignorant person, of low condition, who
might not be aware of the UAW* it a k2al. sense of
his proceediage. It was pesstbie that his learned friend
might endeavour to impart into the case certain matters
which he (Mr. Parry) ventured to my would not be relevant
to the issue, though he was quite sure that his friend Mr.
Hillmans would not in any case introduce subjects without
feeling satisfied that ultimately they would be brought to
beardirectly upon the case. The learned counsel briefly
stated the facts, and then called the witnesses.
William Henry Holloway, 60 C, stated that on the let of
this month • magistrate's wamat for the apprehension of the
defendao'e was placed is his beads for execution. He made
several attempts to serve it, but was unsuccessful. Oa the
evening of the sth, about 8 o'clock, he went to Biz Tree-
road, St. John's-wood, and got near to the boast No. 20
in which the defendants maul, and a forum gentleman,
named Heystek, was with him for the purpose of poleaxe
the pasties out, the warrant bevies( been issued upon bk
application. At about nine o'clock he saw the defendants.
in company with two or three other foreign gentlemen.
They ease out of the garden of the house No. 20, and he
weal up to them and asked them if their names were not
Rameenaen and Hinkel, and on being answered in the
afilimative, he produced the warrant and told them that he
was a pelisse officer, and apprehended them by virtue of that
document, requesting them to go quietly with him. ate he
found they were not willing to submit to the authority he
was 'mud with, he took Hinkes by the caller, when they
objected to being taken, and he then requested the gentle-
men who azeompanied the defendants not to obstruct him
in the execution of his duty, is an cflicer of justice. Buys-
seams, thereupon, took him by the collar, and tried to
make ilm release his hold of Blokes, but to broke away
from Ruysseniers, and continued to hold Hinkel by the mi-
ler. Ruysseoaers then struggled with him, aid pushed him
against the wall, and Hinkes gave him several blows in the
moods. A black ma, who was servant to the defendants,
naked out and struck him with his clenched fist on the nose,
the consequence of which was that he bled very much. The
black man said " You shall no take my muss," and he and
the two detest' lents threw witness upon the ground, and whilst
lying there, Rinke, and the black struck him several times.
He got upend the black struck at him with something which
be believed was slits preserver, but sized him. A general
wrestle followed, in the course of which he was tripped up and
he fell on his back. As he turned over on to his stomach to
get up, Makes jumped upon bins, as did one of the other
peaces. All this elms the defendants' friends were trying
toresene them, and bed not two constables arrived in • cab
end secured the defendants, be should have lost them alto.
getber. The cab west for more constables. He was quite
faint, tos much so to assist in conveying the defendants to
the station, and on his arriving there he had to be pissed in
a chair and revived with cold water. He received a black
eye and other injuries, bat he had not been under medical
treatment.
Cromexamined—The defendants were apprehended for
an assault on Repair. Did not know whether the magi'
trate bound Ileystek over in recogninnees. That charge of
smelt was waived, so that the present one might come for
trial. There was mother foreigner, named Onllier, present
with Heystek when the smelt took place. There
were also two ladles present with him. Was not aware that
one of them was Madame Heyssenaers, the wife of the de-
fendant of that name. The ladies were at the station-house.
Went is plan clothes and met Helatek. The ladies were
they with elm. Hermit was now in court. Blows were
not struck until after he had hold of Minket. Griller
pulled the black servant away ash. was trying to choke wit-
ness. Would swear that He stab did not strike anyone with
• stick. He was mach too frightmed to take part in the
natter. lie had done his duty as warrant officer ever
since. This ease was not ted by the police sem-
missimers. It was praecutea by Heystek.
W. Pink, • lamplighter, la the service of the Imperial
Gas Company, and • *ablaut named Clayard, who drove
Borst& an the leaks to the spot, gave corroborative evi-
doses as to the moult. They confirmed the ofileer's state-
ment in every particular.
Mr. Hillmans thee addressed the jury. He said that the
defendants were molt anxious to times their bitter regret,
and to offer their deep apology if they lei thenitted any
violation of the laws ef a meats, *bare they hell been hos-
pitably received • and if they bed violated *MO laws, it had
been eatlmly wader a nabeenseptise, sad they bed asted
miler the im bold NM they me themstete
s mut Merefer yeetheiher.
Thor me punai of Go MIMI nqpraNlige am*

es babe" is the City es stesettesti, sad Itsylesserne had
lane bows at Aleassdia sad 21101Ndia. lad ho (Mr.
litise) meld set bat ecesphin that the essoleleate who
treated this warred had deviated *ln the psepec slum in
granting seal 511 betnuseat IF ea rho
pert of a penes nosed rat they bad
eostaitted a seams se rash apes Tkk lisps& was
most whoa tbe araels sow is =mpg sestalesd ;
ha was there with a pours we'd g lib, soh.
swot two bliss. ewe ofxpelswhom= was Illadene Itsyssenases ;
he was tig the e ef tbh preessomiss, yet his
hams" ii.l lad set hid to plass way MO et thee. pr-
em. ibe lows box. beans, hartir ef sertels net-
sire, whidb two at pretest in the beak !stud. Heyseek
was that is wart, and why was be set galled P—why,
biomes there woe. alsas whisk were to be kept beet, sad
Mr. Hayes& did set dew Is ease forward fa era daylight.
lime& had pessered Mb rearrest by dabble hbrbeed,
sad bed the seeshlebe sash as be aught Is hese des*, he
would sot lave rested a wenant, but Onbasse. He
got the giber le 10 at a late has sf this so l
111111111ial OM.
CV* it. Wes SIM UN ainames sisim ass be te put
in ben sad Ow sat day; 1111 11111 ONMOSIIM INS Mime
Rereamon snag the best seenialess sitimmtsues ; sod
he 111/ the prima, of Ws gee etches hen the best vile
sad viallellve feelbes. ad Its hed been pits of the
grossest siessadest. The libeeessel booby made
sale severe 011111.“11dMie apes eseet, sob urged that
the defesdreis bel meted Is pure liseruess of the law, the
Akar Wag is pleb *Asa at the Ww tai sell he *said
tell seldom "phi& would arable the WasieNAß le a verdict
of set guilty.
The Liaised Judge asked if the OVIIM, about to be
called would negative the evident, gives as to the assault
If that could not be tamed, what the defesdeate had to urge
by way of apology was foe the essidderatios of the court,
and sot of the jury.
Mr. Parry said be had no *odes top into the "reas-
sumes essaseted with tk• obtaaing of the ',ulnae.
The Meisel Judge said it was straw there was no ex-
plagiaries of the fact of Medals* IirpIOMMIS being resist
with Heystek.
Mr. Parry said It wee sot tha wife of the dohs/bat boys-
rase", but the wife of_ his brother. _ _ _

Mr. lialleatiso said this was so mad Its corrected himself;
he bad .append k was tbs dsfeadant's wits.
Atter conferring with th. defendant.' solicitor. Mr. Bal.
!satin, said he should withdraw from the defend*.

The learned judge, la suuntias up, said the policeman
was the °Meer of the law; sad, se sucs,wee bound toeserute
the warrant ander whatever shaman's's' It night have
been obtained, sad as tie awash was proved by threo wit-
nesses, and not now denied, he apprehended the jury would
at case return a mein of
After eossideriss one time the knew' of **jury said
they were ell semi neon oiLs.
The leaned judge said hs was 'mined at this The
tumult was pond by three witness, when evidence was
not impulsed, and, I. fast, it was admitted by the
defendants

Mr. Parry said he had ao objection to withdraw the die-
seaticat juror, and take MIS verdict of the eleven.
The forma* said their brother barer would cot balm
the witnesses ea their oaths.

iii;ii.,;•aiiii;WidUsis was • moat extraordinar,
piece of obstinacy. It was not imputed that they had spoken
untruly. (He then reed over the triunes.)
The foreman said they could not agree, so had better retire.
The learned Jude, the mailgram on the bench, Mr.
Parry, end Mr. Billantine, endeavoured to impress upon the
juror that he could not but °ones, in the verdict of guilty,
as the defendants admitted the assault. _ _ _

The jury, however, retired, sad were locked up by Mr.
Grew, the officer of the amt. After a considerable time
had elapsed, they seat the following communicatioa to the
learned judge:
" May it please your Lordship,—Ws, the eleven of the
jury who are unanimous is our verdict, ferret to state that
the remaining juror misses to believe on his oath either of
the witnesses who have been examined in the case under
consideration. We therefore trust your lordship will
take into comidetatim the circutamences of the case, and

not keep is confinement the other part of the jure on
mount of the obstinacy of the other member of it."
Hissed by eleven.
The jury having been brought fete wart,
The defendants withdrew chili, pleas, and pleaded guilty.
The learned Judge maid that in an experience of 35 years
he had n met with such a ease as this, and, he had no
doubt, should meet with such a ens again. What the
juryman's real names were he could not say—at any rats he
had forgotten that he was upon his oath, and ought to be
struck off the jury list as a person unfit to serve on an Hagfish
jury. (Toe other jurors here vociferated "hear, hear.") His
triumph, however, would be but small. The court consi-
dered then was a good deal behind which was unexpliaced,
u Heystek was the prosecuting party. having been on the
spot in company with the wife of the brother of one of the
defendants, and having been in court, though not called as
a witness. As the officer was not hurt, and considering that
the defendants might not have deliberately defied the autho-
rity of the law the untrue wm that they be fined one shil-
ling each and discharged.
The defendants paid the lam and left the court with •
great number of their friuda.
The learned judge said these was mot the slightest imputa-
tion urn the officer.

THE POLICE COURTS.

ViOBBHIP-STRILET.

COLONIL SIDTHOILP AND Tin PAULIN Or Sr. Lrnx.—
Yesterday being the day appointed by Mr. Arnold, for the
delivery of his judgment upon numerous suinmoeses issued
by the parish of St. Luke against poor persons occupying
linemen's upon a portion of the est►te of Colonel Sibthorp,
is the neighbourhood of 13ushill-row, for refusing or neg-
lecting to pay certain arrears of the lighting and paring-
rates, to winch they were alleged by the parochial author'.
ties to be liable, bat which liability was strenuously dis-
puted by the gallant colonel, upon the ground that the
premises in question formed part of his private freehold, and
were therefore not legally useseable, and that an amicable
agreement between himself and the pariah, exempting his
property, bad been superseded by the othcen of the latter,
without the slightest notice to him or his agents.
Colonel Sibthorp was in attendance at the court, but took
no put in the proceedings.
There were either eight or nine summonses in all, but
only one was selected for trying the points in dispute, which
was that of a person named Thomu Markham, occupying
the house No. 8, Salmon and Ball-court, Bunbill-row, and it
was mutually agreed that the judgment upon ttis should he
taken to decide and conclude the others ; and also a sum-
mons against the Colonel himself, which, although not
actually issued, the Colonel consented should go upon the
same ground as the rest.
Mr. Arnold delivered a voluminous judgment in the cue,
the effect of which was that the tenants of Colonel Bibthorp
are liable for the rates claimed.

Mr. Procter requested a week or fortnight's time, that an
opportunity might be afforded for consulting the Colonel's
legal advisers at to the eourie that should be adopted ; and
Mr. Kipling Miring treated on the part of the trustees to
that arrangement, the issue of any dimness, if necessary, 10r
the recovery of the rates, wee suspended for that time.
TRAM ES.

TER PORT or LONDON.—IMPORTART DECIRION.—Mr.
Yardtry pronounced his decision yesterday, on a question
which was discussed on the 7th instant, by Mews. Pelham
and Henderson, with much legal, :mica, and philological
SCRUM.

The point at bane was of considerable importance, seri.
manly affecting the construction of several acts of parliament,
but more immediately relating to the 9th and 10th Vic , cap.
36, commonly known as the Coalwhippers Act, on an alleged
violation of shish the question wee raised. That act pri,hi
bite the unshipping of coals in the port of London by the
process of whipping unless the muter of the vessel has cant
offered a tonnage price at the coalwhippen' office for a rule-
, tered gang, end that price has been refused. It farther re
quires that any gang employed in such an alternative
should not be paid at • Welter rate than that which
tsar been refused at the office. The facts are briefly
these : The Charlotte, Captain Johnson, discharged her
cargo in the lock of the Regent's canal basin with-
out the necessary preliminaries, and in answer to the
summons issued in the charge Mr. Henderson contended
that the buin did not come within the term " the p rt of
London," being private property, constructed at private ea-
, and rising above the tags+ water mark of the river.
gik"
r. Pelham contended that to take the river as • mere line
without lateral extent would be meaningless. He insisted
that both the lock and basin of the canal were within the
scope of high water mark, and showed from several lezioo.
arsphical authorities that " canal" and "channel" were the
same, for the purpose of bringing the point in question
within the meaning of the report of a commission, which in
chided in the definition of the "port of London" all streams,
sewers, channels, gad rivets falling into the Thames below
London-bridge.

Mr. Yardley proceeded to pronounce his decision. He
said that since the case wee last before him he had looked
into several dictionaries, and other authorities, for defini-
tions of the word " canal," and fund that they all concurred
in rendering it " channel." When the commissioners made
the report alluded to camels WITS not known is this country,
and it was even doubtful whether the great Lenguedoo
canal had then been commenced. The worda in the report I
were, " y sewer, channel, stream, river, inc." Now, if
high water of the Thames could flow into the lock in ques-
tion, no other conclusion could be come to than that it was
within the port of London. That was hie opinion, but he
was happy fn knowing that his decision could be ap-
pealed against. As the principal object of the digests-
pion appeard to be the decision of a point of law, he would
impose the minimum fine. He did not know whether or
not an appeal was intended, but if noes were made, and
that another similar else came before him, he would impose
a heavier penalty, as, in his opinion, the loth of the
Regent's Canal basin was within the port of London, and
he would therefore fine the defendant Is. and costs.
Shortly after the proceeding, bad closed, Mr. Henderson,
the solicitor for the defence, arrived, and apologised fur his
absence. He came to request that his worship would raise
the fins to 31., as he understood that no appeal could be
made unlearn the fine was to that amount.
Mr. Yardley accordingly raised the fine, at tie same time
intimating that in the event of no appeal being made, no
more than the minimum penalty would be implied. Four-
teen days are allowed for notice of appeal.

811111311,111' DON di TO THE lODOIIB.—The usual
usual entertotemeat to bev Majesty's judges Wal given last
sight by the sheriffs at Fishinasgen.hall. Aa elsborste
estirtabusest was prepared for the ocessiou. Mr. Alderman
sad Sheriff Lawless. presided, sad is reply to the various
censplimentary Meats, addressee were made by the American
Yielder the Lord Chief Bares, sad other notabilities.
Nearly 200 swim ware wisest, sad the estertslonest,
which was of am weal magaihosatcliarootor, pawed off with
ovory possible oolof.

Now She LONDON GAZETTIL—IVidez Jam 21,

BAIIIIII2/111
IlailJalint imam Iluatwas, tranksaJoalllaga Grafadaa,
toliw.boosa k , to wantador Jaw SS sad Aorta 1 at 11, at
SOL, Maw, arawry-/aa• ; 1.4,
wa,
lona avanatio, %Word Rivera. YAM; balm Jura MI 11. lad
~ at Badagballatroat. ea, hiwaraist,
awl Itowlord; aE able, 11/I.
It=load olAs= Ualoswf Lk at trost. 114412awsitSaar sad, haw IS
at
ilagrat Ida.
at
ataar, ; at 448., OalwwwittieL
Sa
at 12, mai at at
w 412441114. 41240414tra5t.
=1414 awl Awart at Ll=2lllll ham
4441(.1141.
J gawdiaa dlaalar, July S aad
st Ist (hut 444 4121241.14444 ; wig., Mas-
a"
Wawa* Itawatay lkits4 imam Sib I mad Anvil 1, at 11, at
Mid Caen. Iligi=sol 1114414 mi sad 044-
Ma, labial; a&
ham Vaaaav, Ma IS at lad ASS.
Sat Is, at Noweallwapa. Court! So la., Ball and 00., Bow
Chwalwart, llowatathwpoa-Tyae; oe'.aoalg.,
Wa/day, Nawatatlawraa-Tyaa.
Tan Gomm. oatiaman.l.a, Law, aim brwouscs COMPANT,
July 4at 11, sad Aiwa 14 at 11, at Baalaffiall-street.
Nap's' sad 00., Pniketelea.42aw. Old Jewry; off. Ralf., Pilataell,
adaalhahamtwoa.
thatai WlLLutis sad JAMB W 11498, Groat Diatafflasegity, sad
Mlle-end, bullied; Joao 24 et IS, mad August latl, at 'nibs&
ItLet. Bawer, Graradas-equass; ad. swig, Mumma,

—...--.
Joss 19. Tama Casa, abiteshapel.roed, atabiskesper.
lase S. WILLIAM Maw sad HJOIRT Haus, liftezhask, Denblik-
airs, paper sanufseturers.
Jaw 3. Joan Mom, Aldsagslasteset aty stook aseutastarar.
DECLARATIONS OF DIVIDEND&
TROMAI MARTINSON All tam Holtra.a.lieektang4.lasotashire, ONO
hator-2ad div. of as , June 21, sad any su mat Friday, at
°kaiak's, Hull.
&MARIN C.aaysn, Cloarndon, Laseetashlre, baskotith—div. oi
b. 3d., at Brook",
Tara USWINULT firmer-dir. of
is. 10L, at &oats, Loma
BURNT W,...AM GODWIN. Llama, ship and boat builder-Ist sod
Inal div. of Ss. ad, June 21, sod any subsequent Friday, at Car.
risk's, Hull.
EMAIL. Howar, Liman, kaillar—lst and anal &v. of Id., June 21,
sad any subsaikent Friday, at Carnek's, Hull.
Jam Jatiumm, Leduiatiry. Totkoldoll, cora attar-Ist di.. le. 60.,
June 26, and any subsequent Monday or Tuesday, at Hope's, Leeds.
Jana Ashby.de.a.lauels, Leicestershire, cbemist—div. of
Is. 6d , at Loseby's, Lamar.
Wawa Naas; Nahanni', laiestashlns, saddler-411v. of Sa. 9d.,
at Lathy's, Leaelitat.
TUMOR Pacraa, Preston, Laseaddre, spindle and By maker—lat
div. of is., July 2, and say salasquent Tuesday, at Pat's, Nan-
. .

JA IM ELVIS. Itindstoo.opoaatall, OM anal dlr. of
7s. IL, Jaw 21, _aod any .utsergeest Friday, at Carrick's, 11.11.
WILLLUI UAW ifMllimadar—let mad flail div. of la 7d.,
Joao 13, and say daboisassat Midday or Tuesday, at Hope%
Leeds.

BoruZZlMErno, Doke/ter, jo►oc—div. ot Is. 2d.. M broby'o, tcl

cestear.

i4lllll 141ISCILII. Loughborough, Leicestershire, horsedeake—ete. of
Is. Iod., at Brucles,Loughborough.
',muse ti.) WAIST Kingston-upon-Hull, millwright-2nd and final
dw. of Is. Std., June 21, and any subsequent Friday, at Garrick%
Hull.
'AMU 'lams, Lard., tailor—let and final dlr. of Id June 25, and
any subsequent Monday or Tuesday, at llop:'s, Lade.
DI VIDRNDB.—JuIy 18. W. Bedford, Fen Drayton, Cambridgeshire,
pedallcan—July 19. J.M.ltlask4l,lasei Wharf. Blackfriars. cement
inanufacturer—Ju4 R. lb. Cans Whitby, Yorkshire, tanker
July 21. 0. Davison, Alawick. . oritionberland, earpenter—July 22.
A. Mason, Ka:berth, P‘mbnaksehire, groat —July 18. T. Mos, West
Danforth end Thrishngton, Durham. linieburner—July 18. F. Giles
and J. Odes, lineward.etrest, Spltallields, slk stimittbeturers—July
Ilepweetb, Selby, Yorkshire, linendraper —July 18. B. Kent,
Medley, Berkshire, lodengbouse keeper—July IL It. Lund, Black.
barn, Lancashire, onion spinner—July 19. B. Ilfsrtineld, Frederick-
etreet, Regent-park, and Nottingliszewnewa, Marylshone, ceschmaker
—July 12. M. Ricketts, Mosegate.street, City. merzbaat —July 12. M. ,
Tspley, thilmouth, Demaddre, Ilareadrapre—July IL Marla Frances
Themes, Bristol, hotel keeper—July 18. R. White, Thorne, Goer and
Sundt eland, Burka", merchant.

CLITIVICATiM to be pasted, mhos amass ha shown to the contrary,
on tee day at meeting.
July IS. A. Brown, Liverpool, provnion merchant—July IS. J.
Guy .t, Birmingham, commandos ngent—July 13. N.. 1. Holloway,
liderries, City, clock manufacturer—July IS. G. G. *aeon, Itugeley,
Immalore. 'won winner —July IS. 8. Misplay, Walmil, Stafford-
shire, horse dealer—July 12. J. R. Phn, Birkenhead, Cheshire, hek.
maker -July IS. W. Todd, Liverpool, proclaim merchant—July 29.
T. Wakefield, Lenten, Nottinghamshire, merchant—July 19. J. Young
and It. Y. Watson, hunderimad, ahiphuilders.
PAK! NERSIII PS DISSOLVED. —O. R. Ayahford and W. H.
Merry Bruadelist, Devonshire, eurgeons—W. U. Bell, J. Wawa, and
kiln:Won, helper, Derbyshire, carpenter—T. Brown and D.
Prichard, Nottlnghamractra and 1 ligh-street, Marylsbsoe, coach.
smith,—Joseph Citherall and John Catherall, Leeds, bricklayt re—J.
Chapman and T. Stayiry, Ilisec'enbe:d, Cheshire, sWc throwtters—N.
Cobham and C. J. Ashneld, Ware, ItertJordahire, attornies—J. Duck
and W. Duck, Lind m-rad. Southwark, metal merchants—T. Patchett
and H. Thompson, Liverpool, fruit brokers .1. Glover and T.
Thorp, Licerp..ol, 001111XliA•1011 agenta-1. Hammond and J. B. Nicklin,
Wolverhampton, etaffordabire, ml refiners—P. Hawke and A. Paul,
Kirby-street, lineon.garden, printer's broken—T. Hitching and
J. Suinarlelik Halifax, Yorkshire, carpentern—J. Horsfield, T. Hera-
field, and G. Glover, Wheelock, Cheshire, salt proprleiQrk so far as
regards G. Gloves—R. Hunt and Elisabeth Hunt, Briatel, brush and
bellows manufacturers—J. King and J. T. Honey, Nottingham, late
tnanufacturers—A. Macey and W. M. Elliott, Dartmouth, Devonshire
drapers—U. Radford and G. klouthall, Gracechumb-etrest, City, coal
merchmta—susannah Bothwell and J. Wild, Itochtlile, Lancashire
hat manufacturer,—U. Schilling and W. S. Sut•on, Brighton, soya
wat,rmanufacturers—lLSchilling and J. IL Luoard, Barataria, cock

manufscturer-A. ti.m, CoWorry, gram merr7.l;:ni,.sofsTi;re,rards
his connexion with the City of Glasgow Bank—E. ',yawns and K. W.
Symons, Old rish.rtreet, City, impnro rs of foreign guods—li.Warille
and J. Cook, Rushton, Staffordshire, silk dyers.

SCOTCH SEQUE9TILITION3.
TnoiAq Ibtaulaloa, Edlnbcrgh, taker, June 2t4 sad July 19, at the
Royal Exchange• Coffeehouse, Edinburgh.
Jour llotnox, Paisley, draper, June 23 and July le, at the Semen's
Head inn, l'aidey.
Manama% bl'friaLaxit, Blairgewrie, baker, June 27 and July 19, at
W.Larea's Ina,
Wairdas Yna, 01mi:ow, collector of the tonnage dullos, June 23 and
July 16. at Forrest. r's Commercial llotel, 61.01ew.
Jowa Waoaac, Dundee, cianutActuscr, June 2t and July 31, a: Ander.
ion's Inn, Luanne.