The Express.
London, England, 1859-01-17 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, MONDAY EVENING, JANUARY 17, 1869.

the creditors of the prepirty, ordered the insolvent to be I
discharged in 15 calmest mouths from the date oldie ,estlng
order for making away with bk property.
IN 111 Z. I. 101111150 N.
byThisksolvent wu apposed b Mr. Raid and was supported
Kr. Mink. The lasagne less a asseer-ateriser sad had
Wm est wilts to Bassos Ayres, titzessis of which he
was to meat hoar to the which he feted
?titlark& azgisaded =gay br the 'aecessities of hie
The awl prosouscol s reseeed eg du menthe under the
disitetioarey deem.

SHERIFFS' COURT.—Us. 16.
(Wont Mr. Proadargeat, Q.C.)
I'ILIACI AND ANOTKIII V. PIPIII.-11111011LAI AND

This was sit action to recover 601.ccavaledes br obtalalag
deastbar • puma. with 1,0001. capital.
Yr. bard appeared for plaintiff. Mr. &type woo come&
:debabiaL

...Mr. Bead dated that ia the mall of Anemia last • Mr.
Ititaidled upon dellademt (Asa old friend), end ultra
(111 r. Piper) bad bard at We misfortune ? Des
hadme that be Ind act Mr. Appleford sold, " I
the bra sad as TNT On budder in
them* day w, INNIS POMO, in Lombards
sinslosas icareatuat amid oral." then what do-
liadest tedletrlbalkoses or, fire. Min, end handed Li.
. .

sem drimkre.—Dellaskat-raiTinned hi that be was look-
ing oat Ss afflatus. with capital, and palaintiff °blabbed him
one (a Mr. Thus), lad now sought to recover his
▪ fir so Mag.
Pialatiff was called, and ;moved the above facts. He was
cassmzminall by Mr. Sharpe at acme iamb, sad Mated
that be bed smiled to both deisdant sad Mr. Biwa kr his
canntisioa. The swiel alarm were 6 per out. ten the lilt
1,0001, and 24 per amt. .= each 1,0001. above. Hoirankd
es the busiam se Pearce sod Co. He wu only two er three
&lye about the boobies.
Mr. Sharpe this coutioded that plaintiff should be acia-
=ludo' Wag In the name of Pearce sod Co., when ha was
de facto the Mintiff, and should wee as Applaud.
His Honour decided that he bed said la cam. He was
=3 as Pearce and Co., and, by the parrOssios sad ea-
his brother-in-law, nectar his ca He was nt-
epoasible to ream sod ;add only sue la the sem under
which he segetisted the business.
Mr. Sharp Ma proceeded to show that plastid had ao
claim upon Misdealt, and should rather look to Mr. Dina
Defendant wee (salad. His MMus did not materially
affect that gives by the plelatif4 except that he was commu-
slogan with his as Applaud.
Kr. Sharpe then pat it, what/her, if plaintiff had any claim,
he should not have sold both plums P
Mr. Beard pointed oat that, by the county court law,
plaintiff waspannitted to see oae rimer. He oratemad
chat If ever a man was fairly satitled to a MU Of nosey,
that was the plaintiff in the present can. By plebaid's
imam defendant had obtained a good ram, sad It wss
absurd to [gnus the fact that plaintiff canted cm the !Maus
es
Pearce sod Co.
. . . . . .

His Honour said that in thle case plaintiff had elected to
am Piper, end was allowed by the county court law to do
on. He did not see that defendant had soy reason to com-
plain. Plaintiff had evidently conducted this transaction
not only most efficiently, but most rapidly. Barely de.
hudeet would not grumble became plaintiff had procured
him what ha wanted in three days. Every one remembered
the *try ef the sailor who wee charged a guinea by a Lamont
London doodle for the rapid and dexterous extraction of a
Wee. hut Fumbled mat hien, at the exorbitant charge,
sold said lie had, at Portsmouth, been Maul about the rem
far bolt an hour, and thee wee only charged one shilling.
(Laughter.) Defendant was not milks that sailor. Plain-
tiff had quickly earned hie COCIWIIIIICS, which sort certainly
he was fairly entitled to.
Verdict for the plaintiff for 601. sal costa.