The Express.
London, England, 1860-05-23 00:00:00

TO TII2 ICLHFOR OF TH2 DAILY HEWS.
__ _ _

firs,—lf the House of Commons has any regard
for Its own privileges, and is not wholly devoted to the
House of Lords, two steps will be immediately taken.
1--To peas a resolution that the paper duty be not col-
lected.

2—To pass a standing order that every bill repealing tax-
atioo form part of a bill for raising the money of the year.
It is tolerably certain now that the Reform Bill will not
par the Lords (poor though it be) unless still further at-
teenated in committee in the House of Commons. It be-
hoves the liberal party at once to mashie itself, and not
to And itself, u it usually does when the moment for action
arrives, unprepared.—l am, ko.,
AN ELECTOR OF THE CITY, FINSBURY,
AND NARYLRBONE,
London (LC.), Nay 22.

dam Entelltanut.

OPENING OF TERM.

This Was the Brat day of Trinity Term, and the learned
judges of the Court, of Queen's Bench, Common pleas, and
Exchequer, took their seats on the bench at the usual hour.
There were no "calla within the bar."
It may be well to mention, for the information of suitors,
that the fret nfsi pries sittings in Kiddies's, in term, will
commence on Thursday.

EQUITY COIJETI3.—MAy 22.
(Before the Realer of the Rolle.)
HAIRTIN V. DARBY.

This was a summon% to vary the chief clesi.'s oertificate,
and came on with the cause time further directioos. The
testatrix in the suit. by her vnA appointed the plaintiff,
who is • solicitor, and had acted as such for her, one of her
executors; the defendant was the other executor. By the
will a legacy of 100/. was given to the plaintiff, and the
testatrix declared that he should be at liberty to charge her
estate foe hie professional service*, as though be had not
been appointed executor.
Mr. R. Palmer, Mr. Wickens, and Mr. Godfrey, appeared
for the parties.
The taxing•maister had disallowed the plaintiff's charges in
respect of booboos whith, hut ha not been a solicitor, he
must have employed on. to leaneact, and which he, there-
fore, contended be was at liberty to charge for.
His Honour, however, concurred in the Muter's view,
and so the motion ores refused.

(Before
FARRELL V.
Mr. Bayly (with whom wen Mr. Beale) moved, on the part
of the plaintiff, for an injunction to restrain the defendant,
his agents, or workmen, from selling asphalte made into
blocks resembling those manufactured by the plaintiff, hav-
ing the word "Seyssell" imprinted upon them, showing a
colourable imitation of these manufactured by the plaintiff.
The Asphalte Company, as represented by the plaintiff,
their secretary, was established in 1838 by an act of parka.
meat, and they purchased Claridge's patent for making
whine. The company imports bituminous limestone from
a quarry at Pyrimont, near the town of Seyssell, in Fiance,
and when brought to this country it is ground down, mixed
with sand, and made into blocks on which the word
"Seyssell" is printed. Defendant carries on business at
Battersea, and it was alleged that he was manufacturing a
spurious material.
Mr. Glues and Mr. Kingdon were heard for the defend.
ant. They submitted that the inscription " Seyssell" on
the blocks did not constitute a trade mark, and that the
plaintiffs must establish their legal rights.
The Vice• Chancellor said the sole question was whether
the plaintiffs had an exclusive right to the word "Soya-
sell" as used by them. Their rights must be determined
by a court of law, and the motion must stand over ; but
the defendant must keep an account in the meantime in the
words of the injunction.

Sir R. T. }Cindersley.)

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.-MAy 22.

Sittings in Banco.—(Before the Lotd Chief Justice Sir A. J.
Cockburn, Bert., Mr. Judie,
.7iightl:nan, Mr. Justice

Crompttni, and Mr. Justice Blackburn.)
An immense mars of business stands for disposal in
this court. In the " new trial paper," the entries are 57 ;
in the special paper, 20 ; and in the crown paper, 34 ; whihs
of enhuged roles there are 10.