The Express.
London, England, 1860-07-11 00:00:00

ORDER OF COURT.

Whereas, from the present state of the business before the
Vice-Chancellors Sir K. T. Kindersley and Sir W. P. Wood re-
spectively, it is expedient that a portion of the causes standing
for hearing before the Viet-Chaneellor Sir W. P. Wood should
he transferred to the Vice-Clisocellor Sir T. Kindersley. Now,
I do hereby order that the several causes mentioned in the sche-
dule hereunto eubJoined be acconithgiy transferred from the
hook of causes standing for hearing before the Vice-Chancellor
Sir W. P. Wood to the hook of causes for hearing before the
Vice.Chluicellor Sir R. T. Kindersley :
SCitabout.—Stone v. Parker, motion for decree, reference to
record, 1800, 8, 21—Deane v. Foster, motion for decree, refe-
rence to record, 1869, 0, 84—Williants v. Nicholls, cause,
reference to record, 1859, W, 106 Fraser v. Clark,
cause, reference to record, 1858, F, 47—Dow .. Baker,
motion for decree, reference to record, 1859, D, 114—flabby
v. Keith, cause, reference to record, H. 160—Young v. P 111111136,
motion for decree, reference to record, 1859, V. 3-11titton v.
Hutton, motion for decree, reference to record, 1850, 11, 127
Richards v. Richards, motion for decree, reference to record,
1859, B, 108—Dalaton v. Medley, motion for decree, reference to
record, 16.58, D, HO—lngram v. Midland Railway CompanyrMarshall,
motion for decree, reference to record, I, 08—Davies v.
motion for decree, reference to record, D, 20—slarvis v. Moore,
motto, for decree, reference to record, 1860, 191-lAmPton .
4
Cooke, cause, reference to record, 1868, 108-oakee v.
Buckley, motion for decree. reference to 0, 4—Hadrlck
v. inures, motion for decree, reference to 1850, 116, DO
Tompson V. Hope, cause, reference to record, Ism, T,
Pickles v. v. Pickles, cause, reference to record, P 80—Redwell v.
Prudence, motion for decree, reference to record, IWO, 8., 10—
Andrews v. Higgs, motion fur decree, reference to record, 1800,
A, 62.—Ciairsuu.t., C.

ROUSE OF LORDS.-Jmy 10.
COMMITTEE FOR PRIVILEGES.
THE DUNDOTHE PECRAGE.

Their lordships sat aa a committee for privileges and took
further evidence in the case of the Right Hon. Theobald
Fitswalter Butler, on his claim to the title and dignity of
Baron Dunboyne in the peerage of Ireland. The case hu
been several times before the house. The further bearing
was adjourned.
In the matter of the claim of Adolphus Lord Aylmer,
Baron de Balratli, in the county of Meath, in the peerage
of Ireland, to vote at elections for representative peers of
Ireland, after evidence had been adduced, the claim was
allowed.

EQUITY COURTS.—JoLy 10.
(Before the Ratter of the Rolle.)

RUNT r. ILIUM

This case arose out of the fraudulent transactions of
David Hughes, the bankrupt solicitor. In October, 1852,
Hughes purchased by auction at the Mart in the City, a
piece of freehold hind at Maryland Point, near Stratford,
Essex, with live houses then in course of erection thereon.
The property was ocomoyad to Hughes in fee In May,1854. At
that time he was the solicitor of the plaintiff, and u mortgage
for 3001., which the latter had upon some property, having
been paid off into the hands of Hughes, the plaintiff was
told by him that be could find a good investment for that I
sum, and any other moneys which he might wish to lay
out. Acting on this suggestion, the plaintiff furnished'
Hughes with other moneys, amounting in the whole to
LOOM. which the latter arranged to borrow on his own
amok Ity way et securing this sum, an indenture dated
April 30, 1855, and made between Hughes and the plaintiff,
we. duly executed. The indenture comprised ham-
hold property in Marylebone, reveninis to certain
sums of stock alleged to be vested in Hughm,
and the above mentioned property and homes at Stratford,
which were thereby demised to the plaintiff for 90 years,
subject to Hug equity of redemption. The indenture was
registered by Hughes in due course, and shortly after the
ministration he forwarded to the plaintiff a bundle of deeds
111 an envelope, which was endorsed as containing deeds and
mortgage by demise of certain premises other than those in
question ,"and of five mesauagee st Maryland Point, Stratford.
Len, far 90 years, &c., for securing 1,0001., and interest at 5
percent. The plaintiff had no professional &mistimes other
then Hughes., and did not examine the deeds, believing them
to be such as he was entitled to as mortgagee. Interest was
regularly paid on the 1,0001. up to December 1857, and the
plaintiff did not know until Hughes absconded that lie had
ceased to be is receipt of the rents, &c., of the house. at
EltratfortL As seen se the plaintiff was apprised that
Higbee bed abeseedid. be directed his present eeliciton to