The Express.
London, England, 1866-04-20 00:00:00

(Ins' topher Ole,su, a native of Holland, aged 65, and a
pickle merchant, of Crispin-lane, Spitalfields, and lately
des/ling in Tredegsz-place, Bow, and Ellen Houghton,
kied 34, of No. 17, Stafford-row, Tredegar-road, Bow, were
weight before Mr. Paget for final examination, charged,
span' the 55th section of the act relating to offences
avast the person, with the abduction of Mile Elizabeth
Tam under the age of 16 years, from the custody of her
pants.
yr. Charles Young, solicitor, again conducted the pro-
secution ; the prisoners were defended by Mr. Bailey, the
barrister, and Mr. Stoddart, solicitor for Houghton alone.
yr. H. Allen, the prosecuting officer of the Associate Insti-
tution for Improving and Enforcing the Laws for the Pro-
tection of Women, to which society; Mr. Tolley originally
applied, watched the case.
The evidence did not materially add to the facts already
published. There was no doubt that the prisoners
had entered into a conspiracy to induce Miss Tolley
to leave her home and proceed to Paris, where
Okius was to marry her, and that he bad promised to re-
ign • divorce from his wife, who, he said, wee living away
tem him. On the other hand, the able cross-examination
d Xt. Bexley revealed the fact that the young lady was a
la* instrument in the hands of the prisoners. She said
it ass by her express wish and desire Mn,s Houghton
sacmpanied her to Redhill, Folkestone, Boulogne,
sad Paris. She received several letters from
Mr. Olefins. None were so affectionate as the letter
',id yesterday. Mr. Olefins never said anything improper
to le, either by letter or word of month. He never used
se improper word to her.

Mr. Henley wished the words " be has never used an
indecent or an immodest word to me "to be put down.
Xr. Paget said that Mr. Pyer, the chief clerk, had
tats down the words of the witness very correctly,
bet the words suggested by the learned counsel might be
added, with the words also expressed by the witness "in
my opinion." He (Mr. Paget) was of a different opinion.
A man of 70 who had sent twice ten thousand kisses to a
'tang lady of 15 had made use of very improper words.

Mr: Braley—He is not 70. He is 54..
Mr. Paget—That don't materially alter the matter.
Mr. Charles Young—He is 65 and bald headed, and
talked about marrying the girl while his wife is living.
Inspector Kemeny, of the K division, produced kid
gloves, white cuffs, and a handsome valentine, presented
by Olefins to Miss Tolley.
_ .

Mr. Bexley—The flowers in the valentine are forget•me-
nota Very appropriate.
In answer to Mr. Staidart, Miss Tolly said that the pri-
Kw did or said nothing to induce her to leave home.
The depositions were then read, and
Mr. Paget committed the prisoners for trial.
WANDSWORTH.
IMPORTANT CASE UNDER THE BUILDING ACT.

Mr. A. Smith, of the British Flag, in Culvert•road, Bat-
tersea, appeared before Mr. Dayman to answers summon'
at the instance of Mr. Taylor, the district surveyor, for
erecting a wooden building, contrary to the provisions of
the Budding Act.
The building complained of was a skittle-alley shed, 34
by 12, placed on a vacant piece of ground close to a public
road, and just opposite the British Flag beer-house.
The defendant at first disputed that it was a building,
and said it was a carriage, which could be removed on
wheels.

Mr. Taylor's clerk explained to the magistrate th►t the
building was a skittle alley, and its use had been com-
plained of by the vestry.
Mr. Hayman pointed out to the defendant that he might
put a house on wheels, but by doing so it would not cease
to be a house. He also said that, according to the present
mechanical contrivances, anything could be moved, even to
St. Paul's Cathedral.
The defendant then stated that he constructed the
building for sale. He described it as a portable skittle-
alley, and he wanted time to enable him to dispose of it.
Mr. Hayman Said a man could not be permitted to
endanger other buildings while lie waited for a customer.
He (Mr. Hayman) had no doubt it was a building within
the meaning of the act. It appeared to him that the
defendant first violated the law, and then asked for an
indulgence. He ordered him to take down the building
within three days, and told him that in the event of his
not complying he would render himself liable to a penalty
of 20/. a day during such default.
The defendant said he could not remove it in three days.
He should take the roof off, and convert the remainder of
of the shed into a fence, and then it would not be a
building.
Mr. Nyman said his order would be to take the building
down in three days, and to pay 2s. coats.
The defendant complied at once with the latter part of
the order by paying the 2a.

LATEST SPORTING INTELLIGENCE

(By ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH.)
NEWMARKET MEETING.-(THIS DAY.

SWEEPSTAKE 100 SOVS.
Bresulalbane
Ackworth