The Express.
London, England, 1858-05-14 00:00:00

COURT FOR DIVORCE AND MATRIMONIAL

CAUSE& —Mar 13.
(Before the Lord Chief Janice, the Lord Chief Baron, end
the Judge Mary.)
TOVILLZ e. TOVILLI MID IINSILILW.
The further hearing of this 'Toros uses wee resumed to-
day, when Dr. Phillimore ha concluded his argument on
be al Mrs. Tourle,
Mr. Illade,Q.C., on the pert of the petitioner, replied on the
whole case, sad contended that the evidence wee overwhelm-
ing es to the fact of continuous adultery of the wife with Mr.
Renshaw, end that there was absence of proof that Mr.
Tourle, et the time ha commented to receive his wife beck
after a enspkdon of wrong on the 9th of January, 1867, had
any knowledge of actual adultery; but if that were so, there
was ample evidence of subsequent continuous adultery.
The jury said they would not trouble the court to sum up,
se they had fully made up their minds.
Lard Campbell said the questions to be submitted to the
jury were all very plain, but he thought they should be
stated shortly. After a careful review of the facia, his lord-
ship asked whether the jury entertained any doubt as to the
an of adultery having been committed.
The jury had no doubt whatever upon the point.
Lord Campbell maid Mr. Towle had been charged with
connivance, but he appeared to the court to be an honourable
man, who was attached to his wife, paid her every attention
and treated her with the greatest kindness. Being a profs.-
atonal man, Mr. Tourle was obliged to leave Aahmount Cot-
tage every morning to attend to his business in town, bat
surely his absence during the day could not be looked upon
as connivance at his adultery. The busband did not
mark the signals between the pinion nor was be aware of
the indecent familiarities which took place in the wood. Not
the slightest evidence had been adduced to chow that he
law anything shout the meetings In question, and there-
fore in swan Mr. Tourle connived at his own Mahatma
isms* to the court to be a most uncalled-for accusation.
Whim the irbaad at length mat the adulterer at the
TWA be was only prevented by fora from wreaking his
vessmses von the man who had dishonored his bed. The
mart vex of opinion that there was condonation with regard
to tits sisitsry in January, 1867; bat the wife, in her letter
to bar hissitoad, made such a pathetic appeal that he was
Winced to take her back. However, it seemed clear front
the Mims that tits sots of adultery in January end Feb-
ruary, WA were not condoned ; and, perhaps, the jury would
be pod estemagit to may at once whether they thought there
itsd bass may condonation subsequent to the lest acts of
adultery.
The jury thought there had been no condonation enter
quietly to the 16th of January, 1867, and certainly none
after the last acts of adultery.
Lord Campbell maid he thought the jury must be all agreed
with regard to the question of desertion without reasonable

The jury were of opinion that there had been no desertion
without tameable ram.
The Court prosounold for the diseolntlon of the maniere,
sad ordered that Mr. Itmehew, the co-respondent, should
pay the costs.

PTNZ MIAMI' PINE.

This wettest& instituted by the wife agtiust her bruiting
for • diesolatioa of the nurriage, on the ground of adultery
and desertion.

TM is wee
Dr. Phillizsore,T.P.7rth whom wee Mr. Lloyd), appeared
for Mrs. Pine. The parties were married on the 20th of
neptemble, 1828, and they cohabited In London and other
places until 1812, when Mr. Pyss finally left his wife. Soon
Our the maniegs the husband gave himself up to habits of
dissipation, and also berme deeply in debt. In pursuing hie
profemlem MI an artist be went down to Deroushire in 1839
with his wife, but *dm hie etey there he constantly ab-
sented Idmeelf ban hoe, and his debts inc reseed to such an
seen that be blame almost ruined. 1e 1842 he left
Ude emery ekes, for Prawns, to me whether be
eissald be ebb to gain a livelihood by the ner-
ds* of lit art there, and although Ms. Pyles
osnmaled w orb arrangement It was upon the db.
that umbrelinding that be would either send over for her
if he enseeedled, or return home if his endeavours felled.
Thee lempigery atios, however, had bean converted
by the kW without any reasonable canoe, for
ohm IW le X newer seen his wife again, nor bed he
tiralebei Minds her maintenance. Re returned
Se 1.0011 18117, bet this that time he had been cohabit-
iniverlseaslit severei user% by ale of whom ha had children.
Irvin be eareine4 is support of the oast of
Ma.
Ppm,
The meet dewed the dissolution of the marriage as
preyed.

COURT OF
(Blom Mr. Comaissicsar Oddball.)
IN 11 PAZITT MID PARITT.

r.-MAT 13.

The bankrupts, three in number, brothers, were Wars,
of Wegmbeg. This wee the certiecens meeting.
Mr.l6leitolsom, the official assignee, la him report ea
ewe, ebbs thin the bankrupts bays ham in business between
SO sod 40 years. At the beginning of 1666 they were In e
=Zof 11,1140 i. They now owed 164001., *ad pre apt
ama NW. ; but • dividend el de. in the pound, end
la some um of de. 3d., bad been pad on s portion of the
oar es ersegonsu rade le flay lux The probe
W PAIL ; egerue, lONIA ; partners' drawiap,
qY ; Wee, NIL ; led *Ate 111.11111.
Mr. for the sigkrinolftred no opposition.
Kr. 'Weight opposed Ibiliersilier, and examined ode of
the bankrupts ae to the large mem of bed debts appearing