The Express.
London, England, 1860-08-01 00:00:00

MARLBOROUGH-STREET.

Jame., Marsh, 21, described es a hatter, but oft/bating as
a burlier at li, Iloor-street, tieven-diala, was charged with
stealing, or receiving with guilty knowledge, a gold chrono-
meter, of the value of CO guineas the property of William
Patrick A1:1119, Esq., M.l'. for Ciacknuinuius and Kinross.
shire, Maitland, from his carriage, in or near Albemarle-
street, in the mouth of February lust.
Mr. Lewis, see., of Ely-place, conducted the defence.
Mrs. Emily Adam, of No. 5, Eaton-place West, Pimlico,
de Bed that she was the wife of the prosecutor, and was
in her carriage on the day in question. tilio alighted at a
private house iu Albeedarle.street between 4 and 5 in the
afternuom the carriage waiting for her in the care of her
memento. At that time, un the seat, in • small reticule
leg, there was the watch, together with three N. Bunk of
Euglaud not. and three were in • purse. On re-entering
the carriage she mimed the property, and information of
the robbery was given to the police with as little delay as
possible. The gold chronometer now produced is the one
so misers!, as the crest on it is a sword and dagger crested.
Sergea.itCole, of the C divieion deteedvem, proved treeing
the watch (winch hail been Oedgoill to • hotter who hail
redeemed it, whom he next and who gave his HAW as
Thom. Harrison, and said be resided at. It, Old Comptou-
street. This witness deposed that he know the prisoner
from going to to bo shaved. On the lOth lie
bought the duplicate of the vetch produced pledged for
for ss. of him, and redeemed it the sameduy—it had ever
since remained in him possesaion.
Rewarded ou this charge till next Monday.
The none prisoner and a woman mimed Caroline Mir-
!mare, who keeps a wardruhe and "leaving shop," No.
Moor-street, were next charged with knowingly reeeiviug
two mahogany chairs of the value of 11., and 2ss. teepee-
tively, which hail been stolen, and which were produced.
Inspector Webb applied far a remand in this case also,
and it was granted.
SOUTHWARK.

Mr. Barrow, solicitor, Cheannide, at-
tended, to complain of the conduct of the medical offieers of
Guy's Hospital, and to ask fur a luminous, under the fol-
lowing circumstuncer :
Mr. Harrow stated that his client, Mr. Henry Deane, was
an artisan, working in Woolwich dockyard. PriortoChriat-
MIA last he had a brother, a bricklayer, residing at Forest.
bill, Sydenhant. On Chrtateriaa-rlay be was at Chem, in
Surrey, where he received au aoriikntal gunshot wound,
and being of a serious nature be was conveyed to Guy's
Hospital, where, after great sufferiug, he expired four-
teen ,lade after admission. Mr. Henry Deane, his brother,
awl other relatives, were by his betbade shortly before hie
death, and it was his particular desire that he Arent' Da be
cut up, or anyway* disfigured. Thu droseer who attended
deceased heard him etyma this wish, as did Doctor
Elton, but to the surprise of the brother when he
canes to attend the inquest, and went into the dissecting-
room, lie taught the medical authorities cutting his pair
deceased brother's body ry in a disgusting manner. On his
ukiug them by whose aide's they Jill so, they informed
Lim that the coroner, Mr. Serjeant Payne, gave the order.
Mr. Deane inutiediately went to the hitter gentleman, who
denied giving such au authority, and advised Mr. Deane to
apply to a inagistiate.
Mr. hurl am—Lid Mr. Deane do so?
Mr. Berrew— No, air; I em informed he went to the police
station us the court was closed, and the horrible mutilation
of Lis poor brother's remains had such au effect on hint that
be was taken ill directly afterwards, and confined to hie lied
three mouths. Mr. Deane then put the mutter into a soli•
river's hands for judicial redress, but his case was neglected,
and his documents kept on tho table.
Mr. Ilurchani—What is the nature of your apportion
to me?
Mr. Barrow—l wish you to grant a summons against the
hospital authorities under the Dissection Act. It is quite
clear that they unlawfully distracted the body of the brother
of my client.
Mr. Ilurcham—Have you the correspondence which took
place between the Secretary of State and the hospital
authorities
Mr. Barrow—l have letters, which I now produce fur
your jumper:Um.

*!

Mr. Burcharn—ft appeals that the hospital authorities
have, in their communication with the Home Secretary, ex-
pressed their regret that she body was cut up. They say
it was done in mistake. After that, what can Ido Yen
should have made your complaint at the time. I am
very sorry for the rebtUves, but you see I osnnot now inter-
fere.