The Express.
London, England, 1859-11-19 00:00:00

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.—Nov. 18.

The court eat In bane° and heard some motions, but role
at la tarly hour, ea the new trials on the hat were those
which had been tried by Baron Brantwelf, who was at
drakes.

111111ep at Nlai Prins at Gaildhall.—(Bdore Mr. Baran
Mutin sad Common Jurist.)
ILAINI O. waLts.—AssAuvr.

This wee an action fur en useult, to which the defendant
pleaded net guilty, and that the plaintiff having created a
dintiwbeaee au the premier of too defendant's mama, he
bed duly wed sufficient force to remove Dim.
Ni. POW* appeared for the plaintiff; Mr. Looks Led Mr.
repromated the defendant.
The are the plaintiff wee that he, accompanied by e
Mr. Dana, wont into the White Bear public-home, in King
Wailllll.lllTOSI. City, on the loth of October last, between
throe and taw o'ekelt in the afternoon. The defendant woe
the of the home is gumbo. Mr. Dunn reatived
leM,_ he had deposited with the defendant, ead he
end Mr. Dan began to toes for a bottle of wine. Wpm thee
the dehadant became slimly.; and came round the bar to
tarn him out. In endeavouring to do tbia he struck the
plaintiff two Molest blows in the face, and then threw him
oat of the door.

The difand;at deposed that Mr. Dunn, who was as old
coanomor, had left 1601. In his charge, being too drunk to take
are of It. Oa his returning it, on the day in question, the
plaintiff prepoesd to tom Kr. Donn for a bottle of wine and
• 6f. mote, to which the defendant objected, when the plain-
tiff said, " I don't want to toes with you • I want to get
him on." The defendant then told the plaintiff he was a
rogue, and he would not allow any one to take advantage of
Mr. Dann. Ths plaintiff then used bad language, and en-
deavoured to strike hint, on which the daleadant put him out
of the howls, though with no mere vb. k-nos than was Delka•
eery. lie swore roost distinctly he did not tanks the plaintiff.
Yr. Dann corroboratal this account, and added that all he
ham of the plaintiff warn that be had 01114 his at various
publio-lsortaea, and had allowed:him to sleep at his house the
night before the occurrence, aa he said be had no place to
ge_to. • . . .

Two other whammies, nnoonnected with the parties, gave
the same account el thetransactionse the defendant.

---. --.
Tit* jury toga a verdict for tho defendeat.
sum P. 1001.—A Iia.TACIR DOG.

This was ma seats for injuries sustained by the Win of
dog belwaffisi to As doloodaat, be wail knowing him to be
smug% Ti. &doodad pleaded not guilty, and tam the dog
WOO WI II MM.* dog.
Ms. Poem ogpostod for the plaintiff, and Mt. D. D. Keane
kw the athadatit.

The plalotill, •jourusyntan watchmaker, in the service
of Yr. Williamson, in the City, was Rent, on the 6th of
hoe lest, by his employer, who has a private house at
Homey, to get some cream from the defendant, who kept
cows in ths neighbourhood. On entering the defendant 'a
yard • large dog day so him, and inflicted such injuries o 0
his leg that be was in Bartholomew's Hospital for sin weeks.
His smear stated that he was • rained man for life, se his
serves had received such • shook he could not follow Ida
tat* as which he bed ears= 11,6 e. a week. _ _

---edth74 It wen prow Gently down out at
=es tbey peevedkautel, but he bad never been
to bIS any sae Wm.
Tierplaintes cum being outelnded,
Yr. Keane submitted time wee no proof that tbe defend-
ant luny tie dog wits lawmen
The keened fudge, on tide objection, said the plaintiff
man be nonsoited, or be would direct a verdict for ties
. _

Mr. Pearce said his client would consent to withdraw •
juror and give op all claim on the defendant.
Mr. Baron Merlin observed that wee a very handsome
offer, end the defendant ought to present the plaintiff with 101.
The defendant said he did not mind giving a couple of
Trr.raron Martin—The plaintiff has suffered a severs
Wary, sad though defeated on a legal technicality, justice
e d be done.
The defendant then amid to give the plaintiff 51, and •
juror was withdrawn.

COURT FOR DIVORCE AND MATRIMONIAL
CA.l.7BllB.—Nov. 18.
(Before the Judge Ordinary, Mr. Julio. Williams, and Mr.
Baron Bramwell.)
•LLIN N. ALLAN, lIKIALET AND IIIITZR.
In this =se, which vas Used as ivirdsy, a defect in the
evidence of identity was supplied; sad
The court dissolved the marriage.
LACIANCI V. LAURA/IC&
' The wits in this or • sued foe a divorce, en the ground of
' eduhery, cruelty, and desertion. She weepsnied at Snood,
alseendurehlre, in 1834, sad had bons* bar husband nine
0( whom fire was Beteg. The adultery was
=to have been coannittad with the widow of one of her
, by whom the nispenthat had ales two children.
lir. Wordsworth, Q.C., rid Mr. Bushby appeared for the
petitioner; Dr. ethics for the respoedent.
The court dissolved the montage on moot of the above
foots, without going into evidence of cruelty.
MANTON V. MANTON.
The montage took pleas in 1863, the respondent being a
person engaged on the Orem Western Railway. In the fol-
lowing Anoint the reepondent, during the abuses of his
wife, who had gone to a relative's in the onsalry far the
beentat of her health, sold off and disappeared. Be retread
to her in 1834, bat after a theft time Ili sok duetted_ her
and had never ante afforded br the slightest aseistaum. PM'
of adultery with a woman at Paddington having boss gives,
The court dissolved the tinnier.,
Dr. Plaiting's, Q.C., sad Dr. Slinks apps red for the
pesidoner.