The Express.
London, England, 1860-05-10 00:00:00

ME EXPRESS, THURSDAY EVENING, MAY 10, 1860.

the alle ellegalloas of Ida& were en 1110,11421(
that he fieforisi peenouting the *Mims till he hied Whet
the ',reeky el the Mateserots, but he found the eseschall
met been emesteted. lie bed ems into likothod
make permed bigotries es the subject, sad he
had entered photo where the heal of the Ames was
up to 130. There wee anoliar aims of poem knows
▪ " &Wm,' that he thought should have bees la-
chided in the bill of the hen. member for Hobos; this
clams efaedjmany pe= :ll= waked
cwt' long ion was
arsissary, and the bill was defective it would be better
foe them at owe to repair its imperfections than to poet•
pose lesidadon.
Maier ED WARDS said the Fut*ry Act lied proved one
of the greatest liming ever aanlmted as the msenfeetar•
leg operatives. If the metriffins whisk' i 1 isquaed had
=so we in the sad weals dietrlcts. why
melon
hey net answer when applied to birching and dye-
ing works f Bs hoped the haw wield eel send the bill
to a select committee, but would at pee legislate upon the
✓t. C. LEWIS nonsked that fb goastioa did not
=in quite so chars manner to Ids Naiad as it seemed to
noble memitorfor North Lassaissairb. One question
very diflealt of &shim em oat ef the hot that there were
some cesemeniel eatablielemeits white serried es the ordi-
nary proems of smoulatbire oil sho the week of tiog
goods, and it would not he easy M deulde er they
would be subject to the Peeks., MS er the Pasting Works
Act. The effect of the sollea of the boa member for
Manchester would hs tint Ohms Maid settle
the proviacos of the WI Wised oT a oeeindllee of the
whole house. Ho should peke the 1111 being settled by •
committee of the whole hews ; bat if the of
the bill wished to adopt the proposition of the het member
for Manchester be (Sir G. C. Lewis) should not offer any
oppantion.
Sir J. IFEROUSSON trusted that the house in dealing
with this qunction would remember the spirit in which they
voted for the second reading of the bill, and that they would
cot adopt a vacillating course.
Mr. CONINOHAIf thou4ht that the matter was one
calling for immediate Wsktion.
Sit N. CAIRNS held that the subject before the house
ievelved two quahogs ; het, whether the house had before
them sufficient bets to enable them to legisisto ; and if •st
what ought to be the 'stun of their lipaiatioa. He did
not mom with the hon. member who reseed the amend-
ment. Having reed the thus blue books which had bees
published, be must say that he easiekesw • case in which
they could better arrive at the reel truth, and he
did not think that further inquiry would have any beneficial
effect. Rot suppadog they had the facts correctly, what
ought their 1 to be' He wee anxious that there
should be legislation on the subject titterer ; and if they
chose the alternative of having the question diecussed before
a select committee, it should be amity understood that
they were only to consider the clauses of the bill and not to
take evidence.

The question wee then put by the 3n►KER.
The house then divided, and the numbers were—
For the amendment 147

Apt ._~

14-37

The Wise timig nal inknannmittee.
Upon damn L. •
Sir H. CIAIIIIII moved edetedpeeeteseetpting from
the ooppeerntian of lie UM weeks is vide tie eseupation of
Hiesching or dyable linen, lima yam, and cambric only wee
carried on. He thought that parsons who were employed
in the open air amid Mira,/ be tepeded as suffering from
the evils which the bill wee Mded to remedy.
Mr. BAXTER supported lirtimendettatt, and the clams
wan stall ander diatimioa, whim at a quarter to six o'clock,
in accordance with the stendlng aides, the home rammed.
MALIL7OII3 INJURIES TO PROPERTY ACT
AMENDMENT BILL
This bin posed through committee.
MARRIAGES (EXTRA PAROCHIAL PLACES) BILL
This hill was mad • weed thee.

Rain Intellfgenct.
COURT OF EXCHRQUIR.-MAy 9.

Battings et Nisi Prim after term at Watminuter.—(Befor•
the Lard Chief Baron and • Special July.)
The mum BA for theme sitting amebas 21, et width lbw
me ',menet&
wart r. 1111110P.—Ifiwariloll IFICULLTIONL—ALLIGOID
intoeoruc DONIIIISAL Aim AISAOLT.
Thin wee an action brought by the plaintiff to recover
damage@ againid the deant, • solicitor, mid Poriotcr
of the Minima Mem, for a breach at contract, whereby
the plaintiff weea2pem asztlieher sod as a collector of
mbar Meemeeis, situation he had been
wreephdly dimimed. Them yes elm a covet for an as-
sault mad another for slander. The defendant denied the
=A; and as to the amaidt, pleaded a justification,
id* aa to the general imue.
Ir. Ihrjewat Petendorff and Mr. Jacobs were counsel
for the ; Mr. M. Chambers and Mr. 801 l repre-
sented the deihndent.
The case havbx preseeded at some ith, an a rrange-
ment was made between the learned counsel on both aids
under which a juror wee withdrawn.

COURT OF QUERN'S BENCIL—(Before—MAT 9.
abilstp in Bur*, atter Easter the Lord
Okla Justice, Mr. Justice OmorTerm. pton, Mr. Justine
and Mr. Justice Blackburn.)
lIAIWOOD v. THE GREAT $011101:11N RAILWAY 00111 PANT.
The court was occupied all day with this awe, which was
an action tried before the Lord Chief Justice at the Mid-
dlesex sittings after Hilary Term, for the infringement of
a patent taken out by the late Mr. Wylds, civil impneer,
for improvements in fish joints. The plaintiff is one of
Mr. Wykie's amentcee. The argument came on on a
motion to enter the verdict for the ddendenta, or in the
alternative fora new trial on the ground of misdirection by
the learned judge.
Mr. Knowles, Q.C., Mr. Grove, q.c., Mr. Webster, end
Mr. Hindmizah appeared for the plaintiff ; Mr. Bovill„ Q.C.,
Mr. Lush, Q.C., Mr. C. E. Pollock, and Mr. H. Lloyd for
the company.

BAIL COURT.-MAr 9.
Sidi's(' at Nisi Prius ►t Westaiiseter.—(Before Mr. Justice
Wightmas and Gismos Juries.)
DIXON AND WWI v. BOOM AWAITS.? AND num

This was an action for an assault and false in:wholemeal
The defendant pleaded—AM, a denial of the emelt ;
secondly, that he used no more Viollloolllthan was secemary
to eject the female plaintiff from hie runnier ,• and thirdly,
tled in ceder to prevent her committing a breach of the
pesos, he gave her into custody.
Yr. Q.C., and Mr. Prentice were counsel for the
plaintiffs ; Mr. Hawkins, Q.C., Mr. Thompson, and Mr.
Roll were counsel for the defendant.
Mr. Collier, in stetting the case to the jury, said that the
plaintiff, Mr. Dixon, was an ironmooger, carrying on busi-
ness in Eaton-street, Pimlico, and the defendant described
himself as formerly a captain in the Austrian or Pruden army,
and lately in the Bankruptcy Court aa • merchant and com-
mission scent The action was toren assault on the plaintiffs
wife, and in orderto make it intelligible, itwas necessary that
he should detail some of the transactions that had taken
=between them. The defendant, when he was first
to the plaintiff, was nodding in the house of Madame
Schultz, in Chester-terms. He then supplied some pods to
them under the impresario that thodefet woe M. Schulte,
and Madame's husband, and not, as it now appeared, H.
Desch, and her lodger. The ddendant then removed from
Chester-terrace to Charles-street. Haymarket, and there
other goods were supplied amounting to 261. The plaintiff
once unable to get his money, and he mstitated.P/m"d1211
for its recovery, when the defendant preened he wee a
lodger, and Madame Schultz pleaded ooverture. An agree-
ment was, however, oome to for the amount to be paid by
inetalmenbe, and U. 10s. had only bean paid. On the Ist
of August hat the plaintiff's wile called in the evening at
Charles-street for some money, when the assault am-
phuned of waa committed. The learned counsel called the
following evidence.
Mr. Dixon, the plaintiff, was called. He deposed to the
dealings between the pieties, and his impression that
when he supplied the goods and executed the work the de-
fendant warn Madame's'hustend.
In cross-examination the et= mid the paths had
threatened to send for a for him when be bad
called for money. When found he could not get his
money he told his boys to call when they pawed the house,
' and inquire if M. Schultz, who was represented to be in
America, was at home, and when the money would be paid?
He denied that he eat them there to annoy the parties.
He never said that he bad tried his remedy at law and had
failed, and that he should continue Wien( till be got the
money. He said, "Where is that d—d Busch ? I'll knock
his doable specs off and make him see through his eyes."
(Laughter.) That was after his conduct towards his
(plaintiff's) wife.
Mrs. Dixon, a genteel, delicate.looking person, deposed as
follows:—On the Ist of August last I was walking in the
evening in St. James's.paric with my servant and five chil-
dren. It occurred to me that as I was in the neighbour-
hood I would call upon Madame Schultz, thinking I
might induce her to pay me some money. I called at the
house between seven and eight o'clock, knocked at the door,
and asked to see Madame Schultz. The servant said she
was not at home, and I waited in the hall for some time
with my eldest daughter. The other children and the ser-
vant were waiting opposite, under the Opera Colonnade.
After some time the defendant came bonne, went upstairs,
then came down again, called the *errant, said something
to her, and she left the house. As somas she had left the
defendant said, " You have come from Mr. Dixon for the
money owing from her to him." I said, "Ys." He
instantly seized me and threw me down. I screamed
for help, saying I was enciente, and not to kill
me for the sake of my children, but he conti-
nued to . drag me along the passage to the street-
door, during which a female voice called out, "For
God's sake, Busch, consider ber eta*" but she did net
come to my amistience. The defendant dragged me to the
door, took me up in his arms, and threw me out of the door
on to the stones. I fainted and do not remember what took
place after that till I found myself in a baker's shop near at
hand, where I had been given a glans of water. After that
I was given in charge of a policeman, and I was conveyed in
peat agony ad pais to the police-station in Vine-itneet.
On the way I had frequently to stop, and I was afraid of
premature labour. I asked to have a cab, but the police-
man said it was not usual, end I did not have one. I was
suffering from cramp. After being at the police-station for
a short time I was discharged, when some strangers procured
a cab for me, and I was sent home. When I was thrown into
the street I fell on my back. I was much bruised, and had
to keep my bed for five days. I did not give the defendant
any provocation.
Crom-examined --When I called at Charles-street I de-
clined to give my name and business. I did not say that I
had called to see Madame Schultz, and that I would remain
till twelve o'clock to see her. The servant brought me a
chair, aid lat down in the hall. I did not say to the
lodger who came in, " Are you 11. Busch ? I have come
for my husband's money." The defendant did not ask me
to leave and call again in the morning, or he would send
for a policeman. I did not say that I had celled for the
of annoyance by the advice of my friends. I rude
ill'oMeurtianoe. At the polios-ahtion I said I would not
apply again foe the money. I did not complain at the
station-house that I had been assaulted.
Mary Quin, plaintiff's servant, Isabella Dixon, her eldest
daughter, and Mr. Sass, the baker, were called in support
of the plaintiffs' case.
Mr. Woolmer, surgeon, was called in to see the female
plaintiff on the 16th August. She was suffering from ner-
vous irritability.
Mr. Hawkins having addressed the jury for the defence,
Ann Poles deposed that in August last she was in Ma-
dame Schultz's service. She left in September. The
female plaintiff, when she called, refused to give her name
or business. Madame Schultz was ill at the time. She re-
mained in the hall about three-quarters of an hoar. Wil-
lem declined to give her a chair, and she sat on the stairs
till M. Busch came in. The female plaintiff was in a very
excited state, and twirled herself round and her purse in
the defendant's face. The defendant desired "ranee' to
fetch a several times before she did so. When
witness left to batch a policeman there were a great number
of persona outside the door. Mrs. Dixon called out
" order" and for help, but the defendant did not touch
her; when Mame returned with the policeman Mrs.
Dixon was at the door leaving the house. She
put her hand upon witness's shoulder, who took
hold of her, and desired her not to excite her-
self. The defendant did not touch Mrs. Dixon. When
he came downstairs he bad a cane in his had, and in the
most gentlemanly manner he laid it on the table, and asked
her to leave the house. Witness asked Mrs. Dixon's ser-
vant to take charge of her, and get her a glass of water.
When the policeman came to the door he asked Mrs. Dixon
if she had been drinking. Mrs. Dixon was taken away by
the policeman.
Cross-examined—She did not see the defendant touch
Mn. Dixon. He did not push her uut of the house. She
aPriin a fainting state through excitement.
Basch deposed that he was Pnasian by birth, and had
resided with Madame Schultz since he had been in England
as a lodger. Madame Schultz asked him to select the goods
required for his apartments. He denied that he touched
Mrs. Dixon or pushed her out of the house. She was
sitting on a chair in the hall. As soon as the word " police-
man" escaped his mouth, the female plaintiff got up from
the chair, and commenced screaming " Murder!" The
hall table was upset, and all the bedroom candlesticks were
thrown down.

Croneurnined—He was a captain in the Prussian army.
He had been a bankrupt, and he then described himself as
a merchant in the City. He did not know how much his
creditor had been paid in the pound. He had 1 with
Madame Schultz for five years. Her husband had ben in
England during part of that time. He did not take the
house in Charles-street in their joint names. He, however,
became security to the landlord. He did not Mach Mrs.
Dixon. She came for a row, and threw herself dorm in
the pas age He was 26 years of age. Madame Schnitz was
between 50 and 60.

Home furthe; e;idence way called for the defence, and the
learned judge haring summed up,
100 L
The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff--eusiges,

ArRIOL r. CLAILICL-A CLOWN'N RALAIT.

This was an action for a treach of contrwt. The plaintiff
it a celebrated clown, a relation of Ms. Flexznore, and the

defendant is the proprietor of Macarthy's Circus. The de-
fondant engaged- the plaintiff at 121. pee week, for three
months, with the clear half of • benefit in each town. Th•
plaintiff entered on his engagement at Manchester, and
shortly after the defendant directed him to go to Birmini-
heza and perform for • person them to whom he had pro-
Weed his services. =
The Saint& refund, whenengageme thnt.e defer.unct inuttedieiel put an Ind to the The
faded, and the jury returned a verdict for
the plaintiff—dantages, LIOL, with immediate execution.

alone, and after some conversation it was arranged that my
husband should surrender at itidia's Hotel, Holborn.
Croes-eiarnined—The little girl Lam bad been a member
of our family two or three years at the time the Mimeos
came. We were very fond of that child, and were very
kind to it. Eugenia Plummer was treated with equal kindliest,
and nothing was denied to her that was reasonable for a
child. I did certainly "stop her beer." (A laugh.) Her mother
wished her to rave beer, but I considered it was not proper
for her. I generally used to get up first and dress Lucy,
' and during this time my husband remained in bed, and
the child Eugenia with but I do not think she was
ever there longer than three or four minutm. I never law
my husband kiss Eugenia while she was in bed with him.
My attention was not called to the circumstance until
nearly three months afterwards, and yet I can remember
that dunng the fortnight Eugenia Plummer wee in our
home my husband did not leave the room any evening for
so long a period as ten minutes. lam sure be was never
absent more than two or three minutes. I will swear that
be was never absent for so long a period as ten minutes. I
believe that I enjoyed my husband's entire con-
fidence, and he never kept anything secret from
me, and always consulted me in everything
affecting his interest, except in reference to this trans-
action. When my husband received the bishop's letter he
appeared very much distressed, and was about to put it
into his pocket, but I insisted upon seeing it and he gave it
to me. I only glanced it over, but I saw that it referred
to some charge of indecent assault upon the Plummers by
my husband.
Mrs. Hatch gave her evidence with very great calmness
and self-poseeenon, although she was evidently deeply
affected at the unhappy position of herself and her
husband. At the close of her examination the case was
adjourned, the father of the defendant renewing the recog.
miasma he had entered into in the sum of 5001. for her
appearance on the following morning.

NEW COURT.
(Before the Recorder.)

The trial of Eliza Welemmata'', Edward Weitanutein,
Madeleine Jourdan, and Herman }Fie}, for ocmspiring toge-
ther to obtain money by false pretences, sad also for joining
to impede the course of justice by giving false evidence upon
a trial in the Court of Queen's Bench, was resumed in this
court.

Mr. Huddleston, Q.C., Mr. Sleigh, and Mr. Poland,
prosecuted: and Mr. Berjesat Parry, Mr. Giffard, Mr. Best,
and Mr. Kenealy, defended.
The defendant Madeleine Jourdan, who had been out on
bail, again surrendered.
Previously to the learned counsel addressing the jury for
the defence, a record of the life of Weltsenstein, written by
himself, wasr,ad.
. . . .

It appeared horn the particulars contained in it, that the
writer entered the Austrian army in 1848 and had seen
much service, but quitted in 1853 in consequence of having
some dispute with the commanding officer arising out of his
marrying, which took place in 1852 without the proper
sanction of the military authorities. 'These and the circum-
stance of his having killed one of hie comrades in a duel led
to his having sought a refuge in this country.
In answer to the B. Mr. Stohwaseer said he had
never offered to settle the action.

Mr. Henesl then addressed the jury on behalf of the
defendants Weltzenstein, and commenced by begging of
them not to let the decision of the jury in the Court of
Queen's Bench influence them in the conclusion they
came to in this matter, as the innss were different.
In a criminal case the duty of the prosecution was to make
out • case entirely free from doubt, and in this case
it would be • bold man who could may that it
was free from reasonable doubt. The prosecutor
had written, and from an independent source
had the history which Welt:4)o'l.in had given
of himself confirmed ; and he would ask if he was not of high
birth as well as the lady, and therefore that part of the
ems bad not been made out. With regard to the story of the
child, it bad not been shown that the defendants whom he
represented had not got one. The learned counsel con-
tended that the whole nature of the correspondenee and
conduct of the prosecutor led to an inference not to be
resisted by any sensible mind that the prosecutor was in-
fluenced by an immoral consideration when he parted
with his money ; and if so there was an end of
he case. Prosecutor upon his own showing was fully
aware of the position of all the parties, and it
was blaspheming the name of charity to use
It in connexion with conduct like the prosecutor's. Could
there be a particle of • doubt that he wee telling an untruth
when he denied the letter of amkpaties, and said it was a
forgery? And, spin, as to the memult he complained of ; if,
as he said, he thought it was a plant, why leave? and when
he got to his club and was sent for, why not come back
end face the accusation ? He contended that his whole con-
duct was such as to railse grave doubt as to hi truthfulness.
Mr. Serjeant Parry said that his learned Mend had
addressed them, the jury, so fully and so eloquently upon
the whole subject that but little was left for him to urge
upon the case generally. Still the topics left to him were not
quite the same, and upon the part of Madame Jourdan
he had to publicly complain of the manner in which the
leadingoounsel for the prosecution had sought to prejudice
the came as far as his client was concerned. He alluded to
the remarks which he bad made in his opening speech
about her marriage ; he should show that the prosecutor
was an unscrupulous man, and his client a respectable
woman, and the prosecution had not been conducted at all
in a proper spirit of public justice ; but he did not antici-
pate it would impose upon the jury, although the charity
and wealth of this great west-end shopkeeper had been so
much vaunted during the opening speech. His client had
no motive for taking any part in this
fraud. It had not been shown that she
been any gainer by the matter. He (the learned counsel)
accused him of mingle, which, if not consummated, was at
blest intended, and be wished to know if the sick woman re-
quired his &timelines, whether his (prosecutor's) wife knew
of the kindness he was showing this woman. His wife might
have been called, and have proved that tl e matter was
known to her. The prosecutor was trading upon a false
character for morals. He bad become referee in a false
name, and then denied the fact. His conduct, be contended,
had been immoral, and he (the learned counsel), in conclu-
sion, said that the jury would do well to remember that
prosecutor in denying the matter would not be the first man
of respectability who had so endeavoured to shield himself
from expostue under the sanctity of an oath.
Mr. Best, in • very humorous and energetic speech,
which was much applauded, contended that the part which
Frisk was shown to have taken in the matter was so trifling
that it wee a part of the burlesque, which he called the pro-
secution to include him in the unlictment.
Lady Stanley was then called by Mr. Parry, and she stated
that she had known the defendant Jourdan since 1852,
having dealt with her. She was a respectable woman. She
introduced to her notice Madame Weltzenstein to obtain
her some work. Jourdan was very charitable. Count
Napoleon introduced Madame Weltrenstein to her notice.
Cross-examined--Count Napoleon only knew that she was
in distress.

Tire evidence of two girls who had been in Jourdan's
employment proved that during May and June, 1858,
Madame JOlllll.lll had turned the prosecutor out of her shop.
A boy named warden said that in 1858 he was page at
the house in Eccleston•terrace. The prosecutor would come
there three or four times in a month ; he used to ask for
Madame Weltzenstein, and she used to go to him in the
back parlour.
A police-constable named Bell said that in January, 1808,
he called on prosecutor to ask some questions about the
Weltsensteins, and he said be did not know any one of the
name, and when asked if he had not given them a reference
for the house he ordered him to leave the shop.
It being now long pest the usual hour of the court's rising
the case was again adjourned.

ACCIDENT ON THE GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY.
—Yesterday afternoon a collision of trains took place near
the King's-can station at the junction comma
through the Great Northern ooal-yard with the
London Railway, and though fortunately there was no at-
tendant loss of life, a good deal of the company's property
was sacrificed. It appear, that about half-past four o'clock
a train, consisting of luggage vans, was about to proceed
from the King's-cross terminus to the Great Northern Com-
pany's List-end station at Royal Mintatreet. To do this
it had to pus on to the North London line by • short
junction railway, which crams almost at right angles a line
lading up • steep acclivity to the coal-yard. While the
goods train was in the act of crossing, a heavy mineral
train coming down the decline came into collision obliquely
with it, and cut completely through it. By the force of
the 000C111111i011 many of the waggons were thrown off the
line, and tumbled together in strange confusion, and three
of them were much broken. The engine of the mineral
train was also thrown off the line, and the part which came
in contact with the tracks was completely smashed.
The drivers, firemen, and guards of both trains escaped
unhurt

BURIAL UNDER DIFFICI7LTIEB.—At Luddenden,
last week, was interred in the graveyard of the Wesleyan
chapel, Mr. Charles Teal, of Green-hill, Bradford, in the
60th year of his age. He was a man of extraordinary stature
and weight, being, up to the time of his death, on the 26th
nit., the stoutest man in Bradford. He stood six feet two,
and weighed 7t stone. His coffin was 7 feet 2 inches long,
2 feet 9 wide, and foot toi inches in depth. The united
weight of his corpse and coffin, the latter being If thick,
was 35 stone. It was found necessary to lower the body
out of the window of the mom in which he died, after
which it was conveyed to Luddenden in a hearse, followed
by four mourning coaches. Not fewer than 15 men were
requisite to bear him to the chapel, and on the way one of
the massive coffin handles broke. From the construction of
the entrance to the chapel it was impossible to get the
body in, and it had to remain outside while the service
wan conducted within. The family grave was not suffi-
ciently spacious, and a new one had to be prepared, into
which the coffin was lowered by twelve men.
- -

[Advertisement}-011 THI Loss or TDIIII AND
go a Teem, and as now restored by the new patent mean
of seltadherton without springs. wires, orpainful also
extracting any teeth or roots, or any nful operation,
by means of a soft and flexible gum, thus ensrl the most per-
fect self-adhealon, the result of PO years practice by Thomas
Howard, surgeon-dentist to his Once the Arc bishop of Canter-
bury. The invention Is of Importance to many persons, and
those Interested in It should read this treatise. Just publlahad,
by ilimpkin and Marshall, the tenth edition, price ls., and sold
by all booksellers, or sent post tree hy Mr. Howard, 17, George-
street, Hanover-square. London. "We think it would be an act
of kindness to present this book to oily friend who may require
the all of a dentist."--Chelt..Ohnto " This useful
treatise we can strongly re, nurneod . the remarks 011 artineted
teeth are especially deserving ottentlou. —Brighton (Anita.

MARKETS.

•
coProN.-lAntroor., MAT 9.—The sake of cott t,
day are animated at 10,000 bales. A good inquiry at ye ti
day's prima

LEATECER AND JUDEA—The transactions in leatlw
this week are of a very limited character. The eupphee
fresh goods woe not large, and the prices remain totally c,.
altered. At the public mks last week of foreign raw hitt,
there was little animation. The salted Cape hides were
said and at to prices, which cannot be said of any oti,t,
article. Of 56,000 East India kips about 60000 were solo.,
generally at former prices, with a alight decline in those
the lightest and beat quality.

9011N.—Boerorf, MAT 9.—A fair supply of wheat, as;
prams the wee as last week, seller' resisting any declin,
Reds, 51s. to Sts. ; white, 555. to 581. Very little opri4
corn offering, and last week's rates were well supported.
STOCKTON-ON-TETA MAT P.—The arrivals of wheat ail
oats for the pest week are liberal. At today's market thtr!
was a good supply of wheat front the growers, which met a
fres mU at the extreme currently of last week. Bark,
without alteration. Oats continue in good demand at full
prim. Beans the turn cheaper. Imports during the pet
week :—Wheat, coastwise, 2,782 gra. Oats, coastwise,
290; foreign, 1,076.
GLASOOW, MAT 9.—Since yesterday's rain the weather
has been cold, and the wind westerly. To-day's market sa,
thinly attended, and the trade ruled quiet. Holders showed
no disposition to press sales, but buyers had the turn 14
prices in their favour on all the leadingarticlee, and the bun.
near which transpired was quite of a retail character.

CATTLI3.-13ouvaala., May 9. —Trade was tolerabli
good to-day, at about last wades AU& Beef made ken
2a Bd. to se. Od.; mutton, 4s. 4d. to Ba. Od. • lamb, U. Od.
to 7a. 6d. ; veal, 4s. Od. to Be. Od.; pork, 3n; M. to 4s. 6g,
par aka() of Blba., sinking the offaL

COALEL-Loatimi, 9.-Byase's Betide We{
Hartley, 15s. 9d. ; Hastings Hartley, 16s. 9d. ; HolyweB,
15s. 6d. ; Howard's West Hartley, 16s. 9d. ; Tanfielst
Moor, 13s. 3d. ; TanSeld Moor Huta, 111 s. 6d.; Tynedale
West Hartley, lfe. ; Wylam, 16s. ; Walls End Aeon
Close, 17s. &L. ; Walls End Eden, 17s. 6d.. Eden Maia,
17s. ; Walls End Braddylls Hatton, 17s. 9d ; Walls End
Framwellgate, 17s. 6d. ; Walls End Haswell, 180. 3d.;
Walls Eod Peosher, 160. ; Walls End Roman Hettou
17s. 9d. ; Walls End South Helton, 18s. 6d. ; Walls End
Stewart's, 18.. 6d. ; Walls End Modell, 170. ; Walk
End Heigh Hall, 17a. 6d. ; Walls End Halite, 18a. ; Walls
Lad South Hartlepool, 17s. 6d. ; Walls End South Whit.
worth, 15s. 9d. ; Walls End Tlecenley, 16s. ; Walls End
Thorpe, 17e -Ships at market, 86; sold., 47.