The Express.
London, England, 1867-08-09 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, FRIDAY EVENING, AUGUST 9, 1867.

great and powerful reasons for it, conservatives
ought to unite with him in opposing it. As re-
garded its party operation, he believed it would be
in favour of the party he supported, but that was
not the consideration that moved him. The im-
portance of the measure was not to be estimated
by the limited range of the present proposal. The
form in which it was now made was not the last
form in which it might come before them. It was
said that progress in England was slow, but it was
sure, because of the opportunities of repeated dis-
cussion ; but this proposal was first made nine
days ago, and now it was asked to incorporate it
into the constitution. He did not agree in the
principleof representation of individuals instead of
the representation of communities. The latter had
always been the principle of representation in this
country. Then the proposal would inflict
great injustice on the large towns. If they
wanted the minority in these towns to be repre-
sented, it should not be at the expense of the
majority. The minority was already represented
in the small boroughs. He appealed to the house
not to give to those great towns, excited by a sense
of wrong, the provocation to commence a new
agitation for further changes.

Mr. Lowe contended that the arguments in
favour of the amendment were inconsistent. The
complaint of Mr. Bright amounted to this—that
they were going to give Birmingham a represen-
tation corresponding to the state of opinion in that
town. The support of the majority was a mere
political superstition. The end of representation
was the representation of communities, and this
would be effected by this proposal.
On a division the motion was rejected by 253
to 204.

The Lords' amendment was consequently
affirmed.
Mr. citawroau then moved that the house dis-
agree with the amendment, that no person shall
vote for more than three candidates for the City of
London. He drew a distinction between the City
of London and the other great towns to which the
vote the house had just come to applied. The City
had Ion; enjoyed its present representation, and
the changes which the bill made would have less
effect in the City than in any other place.

Mr. Alderman LAWRENCE and Mr. BRIGHT sup-
ported the motion, which on a division was
rejected by 252 to 188, and this amendment was
therefore also affirmed.

On the amendment giving power to vote by
voting papers,

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER expressed a
hope that the house would come to an unanimous
decision in its favour, and in order that they might
do so he moved to leave out the words "or
borough," leaving the clause applicable only to
counties.

Mr. GLADSTONE said if he were to enter
into a compromise at all he should be disposed to
leave out counties instead of boroughs. He moved
that the amendment be disagreed to.
Lord CIUNDORNE, in assenting to the proposal
of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, did not wish
to disguise the fact that he consented to a modifi-
cation which he would rather see left out.

Mr. Doasow contended that the machinery pro-
vided by the bill for voting by means of voting
papers was open to all kinds of abuse.

Mr. M. Toenail's considered this not a question
of machinery but of principle, to which he con-
tended the house ought not to agree.
_ _ _

Mr. J. S. MILL described this as the moet mon-
strous proposition ever made.

Mr. HARDY defended the proposal by reference
to the elections for guardians.
Mr. VILLIERS quoted the opinion of a Poor-law
inspector who had inquired into the election of
guardians of a particular town, that every sort of
trickery was resorted to, including theft, forgery,
and destruction of voting papers.
Mr. BRD:HT had been informed by an American
gentleman that during the war an act was passed
to take the vote of the soldiers by means of voting
papers, and though every precaution was used, the
for.rery was appalling.

Aft,r some i)loser;ations from Mr. NEWDEGATE
against the proposal,
The Chancellor of the Exchequer's amendment
was agreed to, and the house divided on the motion
that the Lords' amendment be disagreed to, which
was carried by 258 to 206.
Sir R. PALMER moved to disagree with an
amendment of the Lords which had been inserted
to carry out a previous amendment giving votes for
the city of Oxford and town of Cambridge to the
occupants of chambers in the universities of Oxford
and Cambridge, and the motion was carried by 188
to 164.

The remaining amendments were then disposed
of, and on the motion of the CiteircEttos of the
EXCHEQUER a committee was appointed to draw up
reasons for disagreeing to such of the Lords' Amend-
ments as had not been agreed to.
Some other business was disposed of, and the
house adjourned at a quarter past two o'clock.

a:
A I
lot
me
too 1

LOS
ISO
M.
3t.
St

SHARE LISTS:-(THIS DAY.)

ili- 1110
ID 1t
IG
101 111
91 lee
St. 100
St 100
71
St. 100

ibai
1100
ail
an
10U

an
an
44:0
100

_ld
Si 9-16

I 1 -163} 41 415

zd

_l4

zd

id

zd

tio:iii

26 000

26,000

6-zi:iii

13:001-9

68,000

56.000

7.927

si:eio

eo;000

io;uuo

COLONIAL 00'

N.. I 9roOna, I Pd.l CL prism I dina.
860,000,101iNC0n5.40.4.3872 , 100 - -.-
MAN, Do. 1806 , 100 - .. -
.. 'Oan. OSLO p. e.,187741. 100 07 99 V} 4
.... Do.6porolfeb.&ka6. 100 06 97 id 97 10
en.. Do. 6pereallar.3 166 08 100 -
Wm=Do. sporellentil In $1 N •-•
Do. 5 per et Lao I 100 81 63 -..
mks* agolGliopeeper.l273 110 102 1011 -
▪.. do.liNo-1900 100 106 107
~. Do. do. 108040 100 104 106 -
-,- Do. do. 189001 100 104 106 -.
?AZDo.lo.olp.loell9oo 1190 03 95 -
Onlon,Nor.l/434 0 p.ot 103 102 106 -
Nig Do. 1878, do- 1 100 108 110 -
1., Do. 1871 do.- 100 104 150 -
Mauus/ per 01,1878 100 102 1134 -
:Lai Do. 1878 100 104 106
1891 . 100 106 197 -
-
NU Do. 1805 , 100 107 11:81 -
U4NONstalOov.6Bl.o.l9.ooe. INI 100 IN -
MINN New aranallev.lpern. ,VA 90 98 -
1334800 New Bonth Wane
_ ; Ip. 0501,11171 to 1876 , 100 94 N -
1071,000 Do. 5 p. 4.18800 18051 100 90 91 904
850000 D0.5p.e.r,1807 to 1875 IN 96} 07} 97
150,000 NOW latilaed Spar ant HO - - -.
11.500.000) Do, 6per oust. 100 90 92 91} }
600,000 Do. 6 per coat. 1901 100 107 158 -
1 004000 Do.do.l.olJunadDeo , 100 106 107 -
100,00 q Non Ikeda 6p. e.,111751 100 96 98 -
INe.sno, Queensland Go.. 6p. et. I 100 94} 95}
1,177,430 Do. Do. 1891 .. - 1 100 944 964 95}
710,600 s.Aust.Gov. 6 p.e.,67-77 I 106 - - -
De. 1811 and visa 1100 106 107 -
03,000,1710G0v.69. 0 Jan. July I 100 108 100 109
7.000,000, Do. 6p. et Aprl Onlet 100 110 111 1110} 411
Biu'risa NEM.
Mo. IN. I NNW. I Pd. ICL nine I Bsles.
1024 7 Des. 0. Con (Ts ) 11114 40? 42iilkEd -
11,800 .. Manna' -
51 Peat Bonet allops) 3lli 11 It
5,1 M .. last Condon
5,400 .. East Corn Brea. -
6,000 .. Ent Grenville 10.6 !t 2 -
I, .. Lest Lovell
6,000 .. Z. W.lttweell (Torink ) 111.7.6 1 3 -•
-
485 .. Oranbler & 94. Aooyn 03 4 1 -
12,500 4 Oren lousy (Limited) all 16 17 -
6,000 .. Great South Tolgus
5,908' .. O. W. Vor (Holston) i4o 161 171 -
6,000 .. Orenrille I 9.0.0 1 -
1,524 .. Herote Foot -
0,000 .. Monne Down . 5.10.6 1 14
8116 .. Margaret (Uny Want) 13.17.6 6 8 -
9,000 .. links Valley ' 4.10.6 44 6 -
40,000, 4 Mwyndy Iron Ore ; se WI. -
400, .. ow lieton ......
700, .. North M I olnar NI 3 5 -
8,140 .. North Wheal Crotty -
0,000 .. United '114.0 2 2} -
1,190 .. dome (C. Want), 10.6.7 26 50
512 .. . Condon St Claw)! If 840 300 -
5, .. nth Condorrow , 8.2.0 4 f -
- .W. Frances (Mogan), 18.18.9 30 35 •-•
920 .. tray Park ' 35.15.6 4 6 -
6,000 .. Crott -
5 - West Bonet (Illogon) lf f 14 -
LOU .. W. Camden (Unheard) 154 8 10 -
11,005 - Wen Chlvertott -
400 .. Welt Seton
51 .. Wh. Basest (Mopn) ll} 66 70 -
111 .. Wh. Buller Medratlt) lB 24 26 -
1,02! .. W,MaryAnn (Itnahon ) 8 13 15 -
.. Wheal Senn lO6 115 -
LON - Wh. Trolowner (Usk ) 11.0 7 0

No. i Sh. I

35,000.
100,000: 1
10,000 20
12000, 10
12,000
110,000 I
10,000 10

1
1L II

ne;Olio
11,000 •
40,17( PO
00,000 1
10,000 10
0,000 10
10,000 li
80,000 1
MAIO 1
40,000

10111.1011 MINES.

MIAMI.

NHoe Limited)
Anglamol-itrea.Oold(Lint )
Amtrallan
Cape Copper (Limitedl
Capalailliver (Limited
Chentalee6.&l3.
Coplapo (Limited) 1
Don Pedro, N. Del Rey
But Del Rey (Limited)
Fortuna (Limited)
inontittodnolivialold,

apunda
Limited) .Limited) Linares (
Lualtanian (Limited)
Panulcillo Copper (L )
Peatarena Gold (Lim.)
Peatibubatirilver Lead
Pert
!Royal Cobra Copper
loess Grande
illoottlah Austral. Lie
81. John del Bey Lim
United Mexican Us.
;Val Antigorla Go (/
Vancouver Coal (Um.
Val Samam (Limited
Waahoe Gold (Limited,
Worthing (Limited)
.Yorke Peninsula(Lim
'Yudanamutana (Ida )
Call pending.

No. 1 Eth i

las exn

par I par
0.16
1* tPa
1 Ipm
db
7-16 9- 6
16 18...

I 1
11* 1
109.

s
I U! ft
II 11
• d, I die
2-
6an
$ MO pre.

10.000 i

iii.iiii
EOOO,OOO
0040,000
10.000
00.000
10.000
41,000
11,400
11,000
40,000

ii:iii

UDYp*u .

palms. I Sala

_ate
11114.71110
11,911
10,060 ,
14000
11,030
111,000
110,000

14 111
7030
70 75
17_ 18 id

.7.

iii,ooo
11,011
4.-
11,000
10,000
00,000
10,000
00,000

17.100
.2.500,

'I Liii

11.01 i 1
SWAN 1
/1110.000 ,
!MCI'

t I
18 88

66 10 I
!_ 1.41. t

dla

ci, ti ill:
'till"
. ;i
...

_d

2 316