The Express.
London, England, 1859-01-13 00:00:00

ORZAT 11111111111BUR1 CASS.

--
TAY true es action Wowed to try the right to the Shrews-
bury mater, end at the triel before the Lord Chief Justice it
wee !wronged that a verdict should be entered for the pla•o-
-tiC, subject to the opinion of the court upon certain questions
of law.

Mr. Serrant Shire, on the part of the defendente, now
implied for knee to make bis 111041011 some day nazi week, 10.
smooch as the documents had may put oome out of the
painter's heads, sad he he/ not had ass opportunity of con-
eidering them. It weabl he meolemsy to mkt to the docu-
ment, et coosiderable Werth.
The Lord Chief Justice thought that the bare mention of
the points would entitle the learned serjeant to his rule se •
matter of comae.

STerjeaOtibee aid the plaintiff at the trial had made
out • prima facie came by potting in the figree and •
private at of parliament ; and he now 'cited the indulgences
of the covet in allowing him to make a full statement of the
grounds upon which he mid that the pleintiff ought not to
recover.

The court sonded to this request, old appointed Friday
week for bassfisi the matter.

STANT V. JULIALN.-lIIRE OF A TENT.

This wee ma seise to recover Mil. ft., for six wee& Mee
of a tent, for las dining M. Juniusle concerts at the Surrey
Zoological Gardena is 1156. M. Jollien paid 201. into
court, and denied hie liability for soy greater amount. The
came was tried before Mr. Justice Wilkie, when the jory
found for the plaintiff for 201. in addition to the auto paid
lute court. Last term a role fore new triad was applied for
upon the ground that the verdict cm. Recaps the evidence.
The Lord Chief Justice now said that the court hul con-
sulted Mr. Justice Wales, who wee of opinion that at all
events the plaintiff as. entitled to 41. beyond the sum pad
into court. This being co, the defendant must c.ineider
whether it wee worth ha whit., to take • rule for a new trial.
Os the other hand, if the olsintiff consented to seduce her
verdict to 41., it wee not likely that the court would order a
tow Mal.

—Yr. k; Chambers, for the defendant, said he would con-
sult his eliant upon the matter.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.-JAN. 12.

Sittings in Banco. ►t Weetminater.—(Before the Lord Chief
Berea, Mr. Heron Martin, Mr. Baron Wows), and Mr.
B►rm Chenerll )
TAhl !NOT., V. •PFNCTIt AND OTIIZKS.

This ws n wit.• for an illegal distrcwr, tried before Mr.
Maven Maeda .t %Vesta...aster. in the rittinge after Thrifty
Urn. It appeared that the defoldant, Spencer, is a broker.
In Aligner, 1867, he nixed certain ftwniture in the plaintlrs
hooey, No. 2:4 Devonshire-street, Porilsod.place, under •
warrant against • ma weed Thayer, for rates and tares
Ate to the pariah of 81. l'annsit The learard judge left
the queetio• to the jury. whether the defendant nod seised
the goods bowed, behaving than to be the goods of Thayer.
The jury Semi la the aegative, end returned • verdict tar
Me piatarlft dowager 64. A rule nee subsequently obtained
by Mr. Peers to set said* tbe verdict, on the ground that no
node* el setts had been reeved oa defendant, as required
by the load set wader which he acted in meting the salaam.
Mr. Holt *bowed esults againet the role, and contended
this the rase had been properly left to the
_jury, as it was
elver • gamuts for theme w6ther an cave was acting
bass Ade ie discharge of what he believed to be his duly.
The Lord Chief Elston said the court were of ovules that
the Me ought to be dierberged. It WAS always • question for
the jury la such •we • bother • loan acted boss tide. They
wen eot quits satirdisel with the finding of the jury on the
evident*, but as the verdict was under 201. they would not
disturb it.

Rule distitargsd.
Sittings at Nisi Pria..—(Before Mr. Baron Brum*
sad COCOCOOD Jarits.)
IdASTIN I. STOATS.—NAINTINASCL OF A WIFO.

Zhu yea ea action to mover 2s. 164.34. for good• nold,
to which the dtemadent pletiedbever indebted.

Mr. Series** Peen aid Mr. Lestrin were counsel for the
plaintiff The dihedral appeared la person.
Mr. Berisaat Peery, le opeateg the mule, said that It wmt a
moat parallax and unfortunate our. though the amount in
&spots wee small. The p!alooff, • grocer In Beth, had sup.
plied the wife of the defendant, who le • hounder, and pos-
emeasi al oeaskiereble property, with the goods in quertlon.
It append that Mr. and Mrs. Stoats were courted
d 115. Lawrence Church, near /tamp* is Noma.
her, 1562, and shortly Oa the marriage Mr.
Sonde demeresd her, emit left her entirely deatilute.
Sha wiergeroly discovered he eve living with a
SIMS Mary Morita,
aidaoed Bath. rtrn:
oder *ivies, she west to Beth s Heed i
wth her hothead;
' bet be emerby dragged Me oat of her hones and threw
herdeed= dee the sewed. Mrs. Smote applied to the
sod her boded wee bound seer to keep the
maglabto . lad twe seedire of 4W. 'garb. She returned to
reed sod hoed di Mr. Soave had left. lo e
days shamed. he awe wtth two wen and stripped
Ibe his.. of ad , eves to her bed. Ile esti
ilmeted her. ad aimed her nothing for =dr
Owed Kn. IMO. be/ "gilled to the Mr
bidembi Ceded Odd li• • Jellekl dederdtbd, sad the