The Express.
London, England, 1866-06-02 00:00:00

! It\

TVELEREPERSENTATION OF THE PEOPLE BILL. '
• • IfiIibRITRIBCTION OF SEATS BILL.—
ADJOURNED DEBATE.
On the gnosticat being pat,
Mr. D. GRIFFITH presented • petition from Mr. John
Perceval, (the son of Mr. Peroeval, formerly prime minister
of this country),praying that in any furtheaextension of the
suffrage to the labouring classes there might be some check
enacted, by giving plurality of votes to those who had

Sir, the proper time for declaring the inten-
tion of the government with respect to the motion
of the hon. and gallant member for Wells will be when
I have the honour of addressing the house in the
debate, end I must request my noble friazd to have
the goodness to wait until that period comes, in order
to obtain such information as, in the exercise of the beet
judgment we can form with respect to the performance of
our duty fee the public inteeest, it may then be in our
power to render. (lUmisterial cheers.)
The debate was then adjourned until Monday.
The reports of the resolutions on Industrial Schools
(Expenses), and on Reformatory Schools (Expenses) ware
considered and agreed to.
The Lunacy Acta (Scotland) Bill was read a third time
and passed.
The Indian Prize Money Bill passed through committee.
The Lords' amendments to the Contagious Diseases Bill
were agreed to.
The Glebe Lands (Scotland) Bill was read a third time
and passed.
The Marriages (Sydmouton) Bill passed through com-
mittee.
The house adjourned at twenty minutes past twelve
until Monday.

Su CAIRNS, who said that he, like Mr. Lowe, had
endeavoured to discover the principle of the bill for the
Redistrlbtition of Seats, and though he had hoped to have
hail that difficulty solved by the Attorney-General, he had
been disappointed, for all he had suited was that the bill
adhered to the old marks and practices of the constitution.
What ancient practice of the constitution consisted of
grouping boroughs ? The grouped boroughs of Scot-
were brought into the imperial parliament
with the union and had been grouped 150 years
before. The boroughs in Wales were grouped JOO
years beck ; and this was done with the view of
obt iining borough representation. The only cases of group-
ing in England were two, Penryn and Falmouth, and Sand-
wich, and they were grouped for the same reason. There
were three kinds of grouping—first, unrepresented bo-
roughs alight be group torarlcii; unrepresented might be
grouped with represented hs ; and represented bo-
roughs might be put together. he two former operations
might be wade for the purpose of securing borough repre-
sentation; but the latteroperatedas disfranchisement. This
mode of grouping was new in itself, and vicious in its
effects, as tending to expense it was non-natural, inhar-
monious, and in some cases caused antagonism between
the boroughs ; while geographical convenience was
curiously avoided. Seventy-nine seats would be dis-
turbed by the bill, only 31 were occupied by liberals, and
49 by opposition members ; while taking 8,000 population
se the line of diefrenchisement, there were several boroughs
with scarcely greater population retained two members,
and these in the main were supporters of the government.
No less than 39 members could have been got from
boroughs with less than 10,000 population, returning two
representatives each, without destroying their identity.
He objected and argued against the giving of three mem-
bers to large constituencies ; and to the apportioning of
seven English members to Scotland, urging that no reason
sad been shown for depriving England of any of her mem-
bers. He also urged that the subject of boundaries should
be dealt with in any plan of reform, and contended
generally that these measures would unsettle much and
settle nothing,
Mr. AC LAND said that it was the duty of liberal mem-
bers to put aside all triflingobjections and assist the govern-
meet in the endeavour which they were making, at the end
of fourteen years, to legislate upon instead of evadiog
the question. (Hear, hear.) They all, he believed, de-
sired a settlement of the question, and it was the aim of
the government to extend the franchise and to remove
I anomalies, maiming at the same time as little alte-
ratione in the present balance of parties, and disturbing
the present framework of the constitution as little as pos-
sible. (Hear, hear.) Far himself, he looked forward to a
speedy settlement of the question, for he bad confidence
in the result of the deliberations of the house, and in the
influence of enlightened public opinion. (Hear.)
Mr. B.COCHRANE believed that the bill would not be a
settlement of the question. They had it on theauthority of
the leaders below the gangway opposite that it would not
be a settlement. The hon. member concluded by express-
ing his determination to oppose, in every way, the bill,
which he believed to be fraught with danger to the con-
stitution.
Mr. C. W. MARTIN said that, representing Newport,
in the Isl. of Wight, one of the largest and most populous
boroughs proposed to be deptived of one of its members,
he was anxious to say a few words in order to explain why
he intended to support the government. His hon. colleague
on the other side of the house said that the constituency
were opposed to the bill, but he begged to contradict that
statemerit,becaue that part of the constituency who sent
him there would heartily approve of the vote he was about
to give.
Mr. KENNARD said, as the other member for Newport,
he might state that the party which he represented
were dissatisfied with the arrangement of the government.
(Laughter.) They thought that the Isle of Wight had not
been fairly treated, and he might state that the opinions of
his lion. colleague were not shared in by his (Mr. Kennard's)
constituents. (Hear. hear.)
Mr. LEATHAM believed that this was a conservative
measure, and he had stated the same thing at the place
where he lived. (Hear, hear.) He was in 18.i9 the victim
of bribery and corruption, and anything which he could
do to correct those evils he would do. The other evening
an allusion was made to the borough of Huddersfield,
which he thought was most unfair, for although a petition
was presented against his brother in 1839 it was rejected,
are! he came out of the inquiry free from blame. (Hear.)
Colonel C. H. LINDSAY thought that the first thing
that the government ought to have done was, not the
extension of the borough franchise, but the ex-
tension of the borough boundaries. (Hear, hear.)
The next item in the plan should be the redistribution of
seats ; and the third, an amendment of the law as to
bribery and corruption. He maintained that until they
could amend that law it would be a very dangerous thing
to reduce the franchise to those who would be more sus-
ceptible than their neighbours to corruption.
Mr. A. PEEL was of opinion that as population in-
creased it was necessary to enlarge constituencies ; and
unless it was proposed to add to the number of members
of that house; it was necessary to have recourse to group-
ing ; and he also supported the plan of the government for
ail. franchise, although he was prepared to go lower.
Sir E. LECHMERE remarked on the anomalies which
were palpable in the plan of grouping in the redistribution
bill, especially dwelling on the incongruity of the group to
which his own borough of Tewkesbury was subjected.
Mr. HOLDEN, although a member fur one of the con-
demned boroughs (Knaresborough), was prepared to sup-
portthe government measures on the ground of the public

good.
Major JERVIS was surprised at last to see members
behind the government rising to support their measures ;
hut he was not surprised at hearing each of them prac-
tically condemn them. Although a member for a small
borough, he did not desire to speak on the sudject
of small boroughs, but on the ministerial measures
generally, and he declared his disbelief in the honesty
and good intentions of that bill ; and he should op-
pose them, though always ready to support • good
measure for the extension of the franchise. He
objected to the grouping of Harwich with Mal-
don on account of physical and geographical difficulties.
He urged that whereas the ostensible object of the
hills was to bring the working man into the enjoyment of
the franchise, and even its concomitant membership in
that house, its operation would be practically to throw
obstacles in the way of their attaining those objects.
The LORD ADVOCATE put it that long as had been
the time during which the house had been discussing the
question of reform, it would not be easy for the country
to emir to a conclusion as to what their opinions really
were on that subject. In the present debate there had
been no consideration of principles, but details, which
ought to have been dealt with in committee, had been
minutely discussed. The question of the grouping of
boroughs did not involve any vital principle, but was, in
fact, a matter of detaiL The right hon. gentleman pro-
ceeded to reply to some of the arguments of Sir 11. Cairns,
and especially showed that Scotch boroughs were not
grouped for the purpose of extending, but for diminishing
representation, and the same principle was sought to be
applied to small English boroughs which were now over-
represented. As to the geographical difficulties which had
been named as objections to the proposed grouping, none of
them would compare with those which existed in Scotland,
and they had been found no real obstacle to the working
of the system. As to corruption. the junction of two or three
towns must surely tend to diminish that. He contro-
verted the insinuation that in disturbing the existing
system of seats the government had exhibited partiality
to the constituencies which returned members of their own
political persuasion. As to giving a third member to
large constituencies, there was a new-found alarm that it
was a step to universal suffrage, whereas the plan was not
new, and had in practice not worked badly. He argued
in favour of an extended franchise, saying, in reference to
the objection that it would lead to democracy or govern-
ment by numbers, that the House of Commons was the
en:bodiment of democracy and government by numbers.
Lord J. MANNERS moved the adjournment of the
debate.
Lord ELCHO—Sir, I wish to ask the Chancellor of the
Exchequer whether in the event of the amendment of the
hon. and gallant member for Wells being rejected, itis the
intention of the government to proceed with the bill tow
before the house, and endeavour with theirwhole power to
carry it dining the present session. I ask this question
on behalf of gentlemen who at a great sacrifice, but in obe-
dience to public duty, have felt themselves bound to
place themselves in opposition to the proceedings of the
government on the question. They have no 'wish, I am
sure, to place the government in • difficulty that can pos-
sibly be avoided, and if it is not the intention of the
government to persevere with the bill, no good purpose
can be served by forcing those gentlemen to vote against
the government (Hear, hear.) It is currently reported
and believed in the house that the government do intend
to withdraw, and not proceed with those bills in the event
of their having a majority in the approaching division.
Now, if this be so—if such be the intention of the govern-
ment, it ought to be announced at onee—(eheen)—in
justice to those gentlemen who, as I rid, from a strong
sence of duty have felt themselves bound to place them-
selves in opposition to the government, although still
b !longing to the samepsrty. ("Oh, oh," and "Hear, hear.'')
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER—Sir, it
appears to me that if my noble friend found himself under
the obligation of putting a question of an unusual charac-
ter upon the motion for the adjournment of the debate,
he certainly would have done well to have conveyed to
the government his intention of putting that question.
(Cheers.) It is not, however, simply on the ground of his
having failed to give any intimation of his intention that
I wish to found the answer which I shall now give. Sir, I
know nothing whatever of those rumours, or of the belief
to which my noble friend has referred, nor do I know
what are his means of information. Him sources of in-
formation he knows better than I do—(a laugh)—but as I
know nothing of those rumours or of that belief, and as
I confess I am extremely sceptical with regard to their
mirreney—(oh, oh)— I am unable to afford any satiafactioa
to the curiosity of my noble friend in regard
to the question which he has put. (Cheers.)

• „ . . 1: • • r
.
TRE EXPRESS, SATURDAY EVENING JUNE 2, 1866
Ir.

Latta intaltfract.

BAIL COURT. —JuNs L
fatting. at Nisi Pries at Westaninster.—(Before Hr
Justice Lush and Common Juries.)
PARR V. ILLUS.—LLB/M.
This was an action for libel brought by Edwin Parr, the
celebrated trainer, against the Daily Telegraph. The de-
fendant pleaded not guilty, and that the words were not
used in the sense alleged.
Mr. Huddleston, Q. and Mr. F. H. Lewis were coun-
sel forcotuhnelaintiff ; Mr. Hawkins, Q.C., and Mr. Sleigh
were for the defendant.
Mr. Huddleston, in opening the ease, said the plaintiff
had felt bound to bring this action in ceder to vindicate
his character from the serious pd
which the
defendant bad cast on it, and he not help thinking
that when they heard the case they would agree with him
in thinking that the defendant ought, as the proprietor of
a respectable journal, to make the only reparation that was
now in his power, byre tracg the insinuation, and
apol • • for what had been published. The action was
only brought to vindicate the plaintiff's character, and he
was then ready to accept an apology, with such damages as
would carry costa. The plaintiff was a well-known cha-
racter, and it would appear that in 1864 Lord St. Vincent
whose trainer the plaintiff was at that time, p
urchased
an Irish horse, Roden, for 650/. The horee
was trained by the plaintiff, and during 1866 he
won no lees than 2,530 f. in various stakes. In August the
plaintiff left Lord St. Vincent, and on the December
12th December
there appeared in the Daily Telegraph an article head
" Sporting Intelligence—Turf Topics and Derby Cracks,"
and in it was the following, which was the libel com-
plained of:—" Redsn is a horse whose merits have not
been properly appreciated by either the public or the
backers of horses. He is undoubtedly one of the moot
compact and neatest and racing-like Derby colts we saw
out all last season. Every inch a stayer to look at, and sure
to be there or thereabouts on the Derby day if he does
well through the winter months. During the summer he
ran with varied success, but there is more than a suspicion
that he was never half trained, and that Parr's pills and
Telsoornbe cookery (the learned counsel explained that
Telsoombe was Lord St. Vincent's training ground) had
prevented Lord St. Vincent from landing several bandsoue
stakes. Nevertheless Roden, when only just coming into
his proper form at Doncaster, ran a great horse with Lord
Lyon, and it was urged that he would have snatched that
race out of the fire had a man been on his back instead of
a fashionable light weight."
The learned Judge suggested whether the matter could
not be arranged.
Mr. Hawkins said it never was intended that the words
should convey an imputation of fraud.
The learned Judge said that might be so, but still it was
for the jury to say whether the words conveyed some
imputation which was liable to injure the plaintiff in the
way of his trade.
Mr. Charles Betts, a musician, and friend of the plain-
tiff, was called to prove that be read the article in ques-
tion, and that he considered it reflected very much on the
The witness was subjected to a long and humottrous cress-
examination by Mr. Hawkins.
The plaintiff, who it was stated was unavoidably absent,
could not be called, neither could Lord St. Vincent.
Mr. Hawkins then addressed the jury in mitiga-
tion of damages. He urged that it was worse than
idle to suppose that any fraudulent imputation was
intended. The writer had only made a fair com-
ment upon racing matters, and had only at the
most said that something seemed not to agree with the
horse, which after all was a mere matter of opinion. It
did not impute any improper conduct to the plain-
tiff. The term Pares pills was only a skit upon
the plaintiff's name, and every one knew that Parr's pills
possessed wonderful powers, especially with regard to lon-
gevity. It was certainly strange if the publication of the
article had damaged the plaintiff's character that no evi-
dence had been given in support of it.
The learned Judge, in summing up, said that editors of
newspapers and others might comment on public matters,
and also upon the supposed capabilities of a racehorse ; but
if they imputed improper motives they were liable to an
action for libel. The first question for the consideration
of the jury was, whether the defendant intended to im-
pute fraud to the plaintiff.
The jury, after retiring for half an hour, said they did
not believe there was any intention to impute fraud.
The learned Judge asked them if they thought the
article imputed incompetency or negligence on the part of
the plaintiff, in which case they would assess the damages.
The jury found that point in the affirmative, and assessed
the damages at 40s.
The learned Judge then directed a verdict to be entered
for the defendant, with leave to the plaintiff to move to
amend, or to enter a verdict non obstante veredicto.

PROM LAB!

rAZETTE.

Wand OP SOLICITOUS AND FURTHER PARTICI/LABS TO MI
OnTAlrriD AT r'HN OFIIOII OP THIII OKEEP 1111/111MIAR,
00UST OP BASERWTOT, PASISCINALL4TRINE.I
IIUtKRUPTS.
SAMUEL COLLIS, Lelpstoroad, Camberwell New-road, painter, to
surrender June 13, at 1.
Gummi FR/DIRKS GOODXAM, Milks-next Gravesend, geode.
man, June 13, at 11.
WILLIAM SoListoArn, Ceded, Norfolk, butcher, June 13, at ii.
CRAUFURD CIOesMAII, Sonteraeastreet, Portinan.gitare, retired
major In the Bengal army, June 13 at IL
WILLIAM AAAAA ,Thomasst., use,buildar,Junelit, atilt
'Mar Jose coLiser, Custess-house-terreoe, Vittoria Dock,
shipkeeper. June 13 at 12.
HINRY Lamle, Me -Street, New Bond-street, tailor, June
13, at IL
ALLEANDSI HALLETT, Peilton-placs, Newington, beet mane.
June 13, at 1.
HENRY JOHN BerelNO, Gravesend, grocer, June 13, at 1.
Gunton Maim, Norwich, leather seller, Juas 13, at 1.
WILLIAM Kass, Walthanutow, Ewa, superintendent packing
clerk to a bullion merchant, June
TILIMACHUS COLLARD, Reforeadreet, Holloway, carpenter,
June 18, at IL
JAMES WALTER LYON, Poultry, banker, June 12, at
J.
u
fiAnuaL Muse, Church-road, Battersea, engineer, ne 12, at 1.
Resius Kee, Brunswick-plam, City-road, late licensed victual-
ler, June 12, at 2.
Geoids Maser IiIIYWOOD LADEN, Sun Tavern Fields, Shade's'',
iron merchant, June 12, at 2.
MARION POLLARD, Salisbury, milliner, June 1 at 2.
ALFRKD JOHN ELwYII, Grafton-terrace, HAV2, eratuCk-hill, com-
mercial clerk, June 12, at 2.
Gates Gencrane, New Nicioldreet, Bethnal-greell, cabinet
maker, June 20, at 12.
EDWARD THOMAS TAYLOR, ilolyneux-street, Edgware-road, lour-
neyman gilder, June 20, at 2.
Wl,' r•ir JOSEPH HOLLIS, Lion-place, North Brixton, cheese-
monger, June 27, at 11.
HENRY CHARM NzerToll, Pinners-court, Old Broaddreet, con-
tractor, June 27, at It.
SIWALL WARNER, Minorlea. shlpchandler, JUDEA at 11.
RICHARD GRIOGS, St. Mark's-terrace, Notting-bill, nshmonger,
June 11, at 2.
ALBERT Wlesea,Brighton, watchmaker, June 20, at 11.
WILLIAM KITE, High Cross, Herta, flour merchant, JUIN 20, atl2.
THOMAS ORATOR, Cowley, Oxon, late victualler. June 20, at 1.
VICTORIA FORTIN, Howland-d., Fitzroy:eq., spinster, June 20, ati.
ROBERT LARS= Little Dezenth, Kent, journeyman paper
mould maker, June 20, at 2.
ilitruu,ret,2J7une.
at 2711,.at11.
TIITHOOMMABABAFISRAELNLITgyonnitchin,
and
SAMUEL
80Hommmty.
copthan.onitHertford,
Thmoishire, polnowitumber,re:d,
June 27. se 12-
toricananodenrrace.t., Bey,hdre-pi.rooadSurr;.lcoo:rnpl 7bchanleicolid7cer,
JOSEPH ROGERS Nuneaton, Warwicksh7=Suressit, June 15, at 12.
ALFRED ANTILL and WILLIAM WILJUNIION, Birmingham, and
Whitby, Yorkshire, jeweßmm,, June 13, at 12.
Axe BARIUM, Walsall, Staffordshire , victualler. June 18 at 12.
GEORGE FLiToecru, Sutton-under-Bralles, Olou , late
farmer, June 13, at IL
WILLIAM HENRY RICHARDS, Ashburton, Devonshire, mine agent,
June 13, at 11.
GiroeuxTueron,Kirkburton,Yorksh. mannfatturer Junel4,at IL
Fist
j;JOHN Lewis, Pengraigwen, Anglesey, farmer, Alm 16, at It
J:ENuneaPLALlM3,wrilitwaAl2.7:lll:o27oo.
JOHN TOMLINSON, West Gorton, lanclalL, joiner, June 16, at 11.
1.
PATRICK HoGAN, Salford, shoe manufacturer, June 15, at 11.
ben:ki.‘okeepern. Lin,
June 14, at 11.
WILLIAM HAMILOND AmaLKIL, Bishop Auckland, Durham, draper,
June 16, at 12.
THOMAS JArts3oe, Blackhill Ilarham, beerbouse keeper, June
15, at I&
IILteRA 1101.128, Mobberley, Cheshire, builder, June 11, at 11.
l 11.
EDWA oGifili,Burnhant nh.,unel, at 121.
JOSEPRIIDSNOOIK, Portsea. carpenter,
serseta June 14,
derJal
SAMUEL KINSMAN, jun., Burnham, bookseller, June 11, at 11
WILLIAM BeAseLxv, Mollington, Oxfordshire and Warwickshire,
atl .
saddler, June 7, at 10.
JoHN DAVIRs, Brook, Osrmarthensh., blacksmith, June 11, at 10.0
DATlDDAvins,Machynlieth,Mc:rotrh. .poosrolunerl,
JAMES WESTWORTH MAWS, his of Wight, clerk In
holy orders, June 13, at 11.
JANE CARRY, Winchester, licensed victualler.
June 11, at 11.
CHARLES DODGER, Elton, Huntingdonshire tailor, June 12, at 10.
ELLEN June 11, at 10.
CHARLES JONES, Bristol, lodging-house keeper, June 15, at It
RICHARD DUNNING, Bristol, late victualler, June 15 at 12.
JOHN De vies, MiddlmbrouTorksh., shoemaker, June 13, at 11.
JOHN WHITE, Eaton, Yorne, blacksinith, AMR 13, at it
JUSRPR JOHNSON, Bethesda. Carnarvonsh., grocer, June 11, at 10.
Roemer PLUMB, Lichfield, cooper, June 13, at 10.
THOMAS Flog, Oxford, late tobacconist, June 11, at 10.
WILLIAM THOIUP, Oxford, chemist, June 11, at 10,
WILLIAM TUCKwILL, %Mail, Oxon, ahoemaker. June 11, at It
THOMAS JAMES SMITH, Luton, Beds, tailor, June 12, at 10.
SAMUEL HoukE HELLISR, Bath, manager to a Loaded victualler,
June 15, at 11.
THOMAS Vinson, Lenten Moor, Cumberland, journeyman
butcher, June 13, at 10.
LAST EXAMINATIONS.
Jul 13. F. Bevan, Faihimbstreet, (*Outfields, grocer-June
26. 1. V. Vliet, Little Ormond-street, QURAD-GRUITO, furni-
ture broker-June 29. C. W. Sturley, Rose-street, Shoreditch,
cabinet maker-June 29. Martha Bennett, Mile End-road,
assistant to a milliner-June 29. W. Bennett, Mile End-road,
cotton twister-June 29. C. G. Elliot, Charter-terrace, Borough-
road, warehouseman to a bookseller-June 21. Mary Matilda
Adusms, Southsea, licensed vietudier -June SI. F. Coley, Stroud.
Kent, licensed victualler-June 20. J. A. Underwood. Hounslow,
captain of volunteers-June 26. G. Fraley, Hackney-road. and
Church-street, Shoreditch, dealer in building materials-June 36.
A. rufous, New Broad-street, City, commission agent-June 28.
B. Howlett, Wharf-road, Clty-road, ironfounder-June SB. K
Day, Red Hill Farm, near Edgware, and Warfield. Berkshire,
fanner-June 26 J. Bernstein, Pedley-street, and Fleet-street-
hill, Bettinalgreen, stick manufacturer-Jane M. J. Connell,
Ware, Hertfordshire, licensed victualler-June 28. V. delude,
Church-street, Soho, restaurantproPrietor-June 29. J. W. Smith,
Plumetent Kent, tailor-June 20. B. C. Sheppard, New Wimble-
don. Surrey, sawyer-June 29. E. Erikson, Bromley, Kent,
author-June 29 S. Stubbs, Weedington-roed, Kentish New-
torn, builder-June DI. 11. C. Chapman and F. R. Chapman,
Clifton-place, Holloway, wine merchanta-June 29. C. Clarke,
Plumstead, Kent, beer retailer-June 29. A. Williams, Milton-
next-Gravesend, commercial clerk-June 29. G. F. Parson Ed-
wardston, Suffolk, farmer-June 29. A. F. Goodwin, Bridge-
street, Vauxhall-gardens, dealer in grindery-Jeme 29. J. A.
Leech, Libra-road, Old Ford, oilman-June EA J. E. Burns and
C. Allen, High-street, Maryiebone, auctioneers-June 18. W. L.
Gilpin, Birmingham. hardware agent June 96. G. F. Rummy,
Hackney-road, builder-June 110. W. Bryson, Sheerness, baker-
June 20. W. Munn), Bartholomew-clew, City, and Fellowes-
street Kingsland, colour manufacturer-June 20. J. A. Whar-
ram, John-street, Mackfriars-road, painter-June 20. J. Woods,
The Hyde. Middlesex, plumber-June 20. C. Maks, Wine Office-
court, Fleetetreet-Juue 20. R. Dixon, Stewart's- Batter-
sea-park, master butcher-June 18. J. J. Munro. read,
Hackney, and Mincing lane. merchant-June M. G. F. Overall,
Old Keut-road, baker-June 21. W. Hitchcock, Bromley Com-
mon. Kent, coal merchant-June 18. B. T. }butt, High-street,
Camberwell, cheesetnonger-June 18. H. Stubbs, Shepherd's-
place. UpperKennington-lane, carman-June 18. T. IL Johnson,
Eaton-grove, Upper Holloway, clerk to a land agent-June lti.
11. Burney, Newbery, Berkshire, surgeon-June 18. F. Godbeer,
Bull and Mouth-street, St. Martin's-le-Grand, silversmith-June
IS. J. Willett, Reading, builder-June 20. J. Davis and J.
Davis, jun., Aldershot, Hampshire, contractors-June 20.
H. Allemon, High-street Homerton, cattle dealer-June
20. W. T. Wilson, Bunhill-row, Middlesex, hat blocker-
J une 20. C. Smith, Cumbesiand-terrace, Bayswater, tailor's fore-
man-June 20. J. West, Horton-road, Denton late oilman-
June 20. J. Friend, Dover, licensed victualler-June 20. G. Aus-
tin, Prince's-street Leicester-square, barman-June 21. C. B.
Robinson, Crawford-street, upholsterer-June 19. S. Lethal,
Brighton, draper's assistant-July 2. W. HUI, Birmingham,
joiner-July 2. J. H. Wear. Birmingham, jewel case mike"-
J uly 10. L Hall, Nottingham, and hasford, Nottinghamshire,
grocer-June 22. J. Ringed., Foxholes, Yorkshire, farmer-
June 22. W. Gray and W. Jordan, Middlesbrough, York-
shire, bootmakers-June 26. W. Jeasop, Huddersfield, waste
dealer--June 26. J. Walker, Leeds, late ppruuprietor of race-
horses-July 2.. T. Doyle, Moreton Cheshire farmer-
July 2. J. Townson, erosion, Lancashire, joiner-Jul 2. I.
Cooke, Egremout, Cheshire, late Named victaaJ une
J. Ledward, Chester, accountant's managing clerk-July 2. J.
R. Durke, Liverpool, tailor-July & W. S. Redhead, Egremont,
Cheshire, butcher-July 3. J. F. Hartmann, Liverpool, mer-
chant-June 13. A. Wareing, Blackburn, tailor-June 18. J.
Burgess, Salford, late glass dealer-June 20. T. Sharp, Barrow-
In-Fumes., Lancashire, builder-June 29. J. Taylor and F.
Hepworth, Manchester, tea merchants-Jul y 6. J. Simpson,
Rochdale, woollen manufacturer-June 18. C. J. Morgan, Jar-
row, Durham, draper-June 22. W. Davies, Llannhangel
Croyddin, Cardiganshire, farm servant-Jane 22. C. Williams,
Llancynfelln, rUrdiganehire, mine 'gent-Jane 22. J. Evans,
Aberystwtth, auctioneer-June 23. T. Woodburn, 'Tiverton,
Lancashire, shoemaker-June 21. H. C. Card, Iprwich, brick-
- layer-Julyll. J. Shapland, Chittlehampton, Devonshire, vet:wi-
nery surgeon-June 14. T. H. Turner, Btroud, coupes-June
• 19. T. Baunton, Charlton llueve,ll3omeredabbe, butcher-
June 12. 8. Moon, Shelton Mett, pig dealer-July 13. Caro-
line Thomas, Cheltenham. dressmaker-June 10. A. Routledge,
jun., Carlisle, watchmaker-June 11. E. Singleton, Hudders-
field, weaver-June 26. C. K. Evans, Ardwlck, Lancashire, sake-
.o man-June 26. 0. Woodward, Levenshulme, near Manchester,
170 shoemaker-June 26. J. Stanley, tanchester, cart driver-June
187 21. 1, Slincock, Burnley, Lancashire glass dealer--June IA J.
196 Cooper, Hulme, Lauire, tea deafer-June 15. T. Cardwell„
71 Wigan, Lancarhire, clogger-June 14. D. Gregory, lklper, Der-
-112 byeldre, late beerhouse keeper-July 4. R. Leadbeater, ribeilleld,
41 mason-June 16. S. Dermot Downham Market, Norfolk, la-
-19 bourer-June 21. J. Stafford., Gloucester, tobacconist-June
- T. Kinton, Leicester, beerhorke keeper-June 19. Rath Claxton,
Bradford, dressmaker-June 19. H. Craven, Handfeed, builder-
June IS. J. Charlton, Braasington, Derbyshire, Lax collector-
11l June 18. F. W. Huggins, Derby, agent-June 18. J. Masey. Cub-
- ley, Derbyshire, farmer-June W. IL Kay, Whimworth, by-
` shire, farmer-June 20. T. Pinhey, Plymouth, mason-June m.
J. M. Jewett, Hoverport, gunner in MM. p
umpdri-Jne
20. W. H. Minis, Devonport, haberdaaher-J 112. W. Bun-
ton, Banbury, bookseller-June 22. J. Grainger, Oxford, assistant
in a fancy goods repository-June U. J. vems, Oxford. bar-
man-July 10. Elizabeth Brabin, Newcastle-under-Lyme, draper
-July 10. A Maddison, irthtingborougb, Northam
tailor-July 10. T. Li ley, Wellingborough, blackamit=Zy'f:.
J. O. Bauer, Heath, Glaroorganshire, schoolmaster.
BANKRUPTCIES ANNULLED.
M 11. SAMUEL LAVALLIZRZ captain ha her
Majesty's Military Train.
May 30. CHARLES WlNTritg, Newoselieupon-Tyne, rivet maker,
and Raker, Durham, innkeeper.
DECLARATIONS OF DIVIDENDS.
THOMAS Nlterrue °Livia, Old Fish-street, cocoanut matting
manufacturer-2nd dividend of is. Md., June 6, and gabs.-
rvert Wednesday, at Parkyme. BealughaUdred.
HENRY ATwooD iseparate estatel, Gloucester-road, Old Bramp-
ton, market gardener-ht dividend of 10s. 44., June 6, and
subrequent Wednesday, at Parkynt, Basinghall-street
WILLIAM ROBERTS, Lower Sloantrutreet, Chelseek, oilman-Ist
dividend of 3s. Bd., June 6, and subsequent Weaneklay. at Par-
kins', Beateghallstreet
Jan= Reartge, Great Winchastar-etrest, London.wall wholeashe
clothier-let dividend of 6s. 1 June and subsequent
Wedesaley, at Parkyni, Hal ,H-street.
WILLIAM WIIIMARTH (imprints estate,
City, and Melbourne, Victoria, mereisent-Thretrdivideedleiretd
2e. ljd. June 6, and subsequent Wednesday, at Peatynr, Be.
THOUS C0M1110414111, Liverpool, ship store dealer-Ist dividend
of 2a 44., any Wednesday, at Turner's, Liverpool.
Forma Jones, Brynrefall, groesr-Ist dividend of 4d., any
Wednesday, at .ners, Liverpool
DIVIDENDS.
Zane 14. J. Peacock, South Norwood. Surrey, builder-June
20. IL Cooper, Stratlunorederrace,on=te Lambeth, late Demised
victualler-June 10. Sarah Ilianbogneenraoe, Hyde-park-
garden, livery stable keeper June 19. W. N. Boyce, Sloane-
eked, Chelsea, commander worded royal navy on half-pay-Jane
It A. H. Denton, Bradford, stuff manufacturer -June
M. G. Cooper. Shellield tinner-June 23. F. W. Wilson, She Meld,
attorney-June 21 H. J. Whiting, Theme, Yeekeldre, Innkeeper
-June M. C. Burgin, Sid, manufasteerer--.lnne 14. T.
Webster, St. Heim's, , joiner-June le. J. Holknd
setatel Rattan. Deskighabare, joiner--June 14. H.
separate
,Blackburn, cotton manufacturer-June 16. J. Duckworth
and C. Parker, Rightoe, Lancashire, mannfactarers-June It W.
Jackson, Cambridge, groom-Jane 26. H. Mahar, Hotheads, Lin-