The Express.
London, England, 1858-02-18 00:00:00

THE CANTILLON LEGACY.

Mr. 7. W. Parker has published a pamphlet corn.
piled by Mr. Stirling, M.P., containing the speech of that
gentleman on the subject of Cantillon's Legacy, with Lord
Palmerston's reply end official document' front the Moritteur
sad other sources relating to the subject. In an introduc-
tion Mr. Stirling °berms :

...Ile tone which Lord Palmerston thought proper to
adopt in replying to my question on Friday, 12th February,
induees me to reprint my speech, and the speech of the
noble lord, together with the documentary evidence
upon which my brief statement is bind. The sole
authority upon which my statement avowedly rested
and rests, is • aeries of elaborate state papers published
in the l'artsit Ojratiellc of the Mon item, or, in other words, it
rests upon the deliberate and published word of the Imperial
government of France. The noble lord, who omitted to
give any authority whatever for his counter statement, will
hardly pretend that the private information with which I do not
doubt he bu been supplud,reets upon higher or otherauthority
thanthatuponwhichlrely. HMI:11y eatementbeenfonnded on
official papers in the London Oazitte, an unsupported con-
tradiction, even from the mouth of the Prime Minister,
would scarcely be held sufficient to demolish my position.
How far the two statements, the noble lord's and mine, which
will be found confronted on the last pages of this tract, can
be reoenciled, it is for the public opinion of England to
determine. How far it is worth while attempting to re-
concile them, it le for Napoleon 111. and his exponents in
this country to consider."
The documents printed by Mr. Stirling monist of extra*
from the account in the Moniker, 12th to 16th of May, 1819,
of Cantillon's trial; the fourth codicil of the will of Napo-
leon Bonaparte ; the substance of the report, Bum the Masi-
teur of Aug. 14, 1853, of the first coma:disks charged to
examine the question. relating to the execution of the will;
of M. Fould's report, with the imperial decrees thereupon,
from the ifonitrur of Aug. 16, 1864; M. Fould's letter to the
Emperor, enclosing the report of the second commission,
appointed is August, 1851, together with the report itself,
which includes • table showing the names of the legatees,
the amount of their legacies, the sum which they have
received in capital and interest in the first division and that
whleh la dna to them. The pamphlet closes with the

STATEMENTS OF THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT, AS WADI'
DT LORD PALMLNATON, AND IN THE MONISM/It, CON.
FRONTXD.

LORD PA

Tilt Nor Tut's.

With references to the Quo-
No referatoe gives. Utica,' in the procedlag
Page,.

It Is ebeolutely false that
the legacy was paid under the
innelion, or by the authority,
of the present Emperor of
the French.

11;tWe;es 1823 and 1826, It appears that to forty-
lhe executors of the will, two legatees 3,418,285 fr.
Otsseal Bertrand and Omer of capital were paid in or
eel Yontholon, issued certain prior to 1828, and In 1826,
sass to him on account of 457,336 fr. of interest, p. 26.
that legacy.
The preemie Emperor of The present Emperor of
the French Issued a commie- the French appointed two
aim in 1864 to carry out the osnrobations on the will; the
conditions of the will =Seely. first to investigate, p. 18,
the second to execute, on •
basis laid down by the first
End approved by Woman, p.
22, 23.
Commission I. reported, fu
1853, that 8,000,000 limos
seemed sufficient to pay up-
warda of 200,000,000 francs
of legacies, and that, at that
time no legatee, except some
servants, had bees paid in
fall, or had received more
than half of hie legacy, pp.
19 20.
To that commission the Co-material U, reooni-
widow of Cantinas applied mended that, the funds being
for a balance due to her of insufficient to pay even
about 1,200 haws. The the principal money of the
commission refuted the legacies in fon, sixty-three
claim, on the ground that out of the sixty-fur legatees
the teatator must have been should submit toe deduction
Insane. from their legacies, p. 26.
In the same report It appears
that Centilitre received :non
than his principal, p. 29.
No mention is made of the
milted of any claim put
forward by any one of the
sixty-four legatees or his re-
presentative.
The executor/ in 1823-1628 Commission 11. was ap-
who made advames, and the pointed under a Minietertal
oommhadosera in 1864 who report in whialt the 'sem-
refused to pay the balance, Hon of the will is stated to be
toted rattly an their own re- the spontaneous met of Na-
sponsibility, and in neither poleon 111. ; and by a deism
ease bed the Executive Oo- which declares the Empe-
vernavent anything to do roe's approval necessary to
with*. VO Tetley to it/decisions.
Vita report of the commission
is signed,
" Approved, Narotion."

His Excellency the Earl of Carlisle, 8.G., has
appointed the following Olean to be emirs aides-de-amp :
Lieutenant Henry J. Begot Lane, Coldstream Omen* vie.
Grad y. tutted ; Captain William Weetby Moore, Dublin
County lialitle, rig Mendmll, promoted.

INDIA : THE VICE-REGAL COURT.

Extract of a letter from as officer, dated Calcutta,
lan. 3, 1838:
I have beta going oat every night this week. On Tuesday
I was at the house of the deputy-governor of Bengal.
Among other celebrities there were a son and grandson of
Tippoo 861 b, of Beringapatam, the son of coarse rather an
elderly man. By the last mail he received en autograph
letter from the Prince Consort, inviting him to England ;
their dreams were magnificent, and richly embroidered, with
diamonds, de. , but they do not seem to be thought so much
of here as people in England might imagine. A night or
two ago I was at the Governor-General's ; there were about
fifty to dinner. The state dining-room is an exceedingly
handsome spertment, and from the effect of the plate (all
gold) and the number of lights', uniforms, &c., the
appearance was very rich. Each guest had a tor-
rent in scarlet livery behind his chair. The Governor-
Gemmel and Lady Canning had also atteedants with
large horsetails mounted on silver handles ; theme every now
and then they raised to the air,with a peculiar motion, which
made the white hair expand, so as to keep away any mes-
quites which may have been hovering near. I believe also
there is some connexion with the idea of royalty in their nee
at the dinner-table in the Bast. In one of the illustrated
newspapers just arrived there is a picture of en Eastern
prince, with two of these Chemise, as they are called, by his
side. Lord and Lady Canning were very affable to their
gueeta. At dinner I eat next to an officer who had been all
through the siege of Lucknow. You have, of course, read
the details of this, perhaps the most interesting siege, in
many respects, in all history.
Jan. 9.—The first detachment of the sick and wounded,
with women and children, has just arrived from Lneknow
and the guns have been firing a salute, and the ships in
the river are all gaily dressed with flags in hollow of the
occasion.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
THIS DAY.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.
(Sitio. at NW Mae at Guildhall. Baton Lord
Campbell sad a Special Iwy.)
ROYAL BRITISH BANK.
Firm DAY.

TI QUEEN V. HUMPHREY BROWN, EDWARD =HAILE,
HENRY DUNNING ILACLZOD, RICHARD KAREL'S"' BIN.
NIDE, WILLIAM DANIEL OWEN, JOHN ETAPLITON, AND
MOON INNER CAMERON.

At the sitting of the court Ibis morning,
Mr. Kennedy applied, on the part of Mr. Brown, to have a
piece of evidenos struck out of hie lordship's noted, end said
he would at once be able to show the reasonableness of Lis
application.
Lord Campbell—l cannot listen to you.

Mr. Kennedy—l consider it necessary to make the appli-
cation. Your lordship cannot possibly understand my objec-
tion without hearing me. The evidence I allude to wugiven
by Mr. Paddison yesterday to show that Mr. Cameron knew
that Mr. H. Brown had received the freight upon theliornet.
According to the witness, Mr. Cameron asked Mr. Brown if
he had received it, and he replied that lie had not, and then
when Mr. Brown went oat of the room, Mr. Cameron made
some remark to wit:nese, aa the reply he had given, and said
" What a pity it is that a gentlemen in Mr.
Brown's position should be guilty of falsehood."
He submitted that this was no evidence against
Mr. Brown, and that it ought therefore to be expunged from
hie lordship's notes. It could only have been asked for the
purpose of exciting a prejudice against Isis client.
Sir F. Thesiger said if any evidence bad inadvertently
got upon the notes, which ought not to have been received,
it was the desire of the prosecution that it should be struck
out.
His lordship accordingly struck out the evidence.

Bit F. Theiger mid he wished to say a word with regard
to the compensation to be given to the jury for their servbxe.
He had spoken to his learned friends, and they had all ageeed
that at the close of the case it should be left to his lordship to
decide what was their proper remuneration under the cir-
cumstances.

Sir F. Kelly should be glad if his lordship would take
upon himself that duty.
Lord Campbell said he was certainly very glad that some
arrangement bad been made, because it was moat unjust
to call upon those gentlemen, whose time was valuable,
to sacrifice eo much of it for the public good without any
proper recompense. This was a very eatramdinary case, and
the law, not oontemplating such a one, had not made
any provision with regard to the compensation to be
awarded to the jury. He would moat willingly take
upon himself at the clue of this are, which he hoped at
some time would arrive—(a laugh)—to express his opinion
as to what was it to be done under the circumstance'.

Mr. Anderson examined—l produce ten bills to which
Oliver is a party. They were discounted by the bank for
him. In October, 1855, I banded them over to Mr. Craw-
ford to take to Liverpool. The total amount of the bills is
23,0001. Crawford on his return to Liverpool produced to
me this list. Soon after his return the bills were mislaid or
missing. I weal called before the board to give some explanation
of them. I afterwards found the bills. On the 18th Dec., 1865,
I want before a oourt of the directors when the general
manager, Mr. Cameron, explained how the bills had been
found. I produced to the court the ten bills and Oliver's
per book, as well sa the list now Defers rne.
Cross-examlned by Sir F. Kelly—The earliest of the bills
is the 7th November, 1854, and the latest the 24th April,
1865. The whole debt due by Oliver was in respect of the
first half-yeer of 1855. There were some payments In
1866-8 which reduced the amount.

wer * dee the Jul-IThreetiateeieire to the fife when the tills
e .

Cresireneadna tion continued—l do not know whether
these bills were included in the deed of Mr. Oliver.

The deed was ItWeintl27lt wr attecuted by Oliver on
ith October, 1864, end assigned all Mt effects for the benefit
of his creditors, reserving the right of creditors upon the
emeuides which they held.
Cross-examined by Mr. James—Mr. Oliver was the moat
extensive shipowner in Liverpool, and reported before his
bankruptcy to be a very wealthy man. He failed for more
than million of money.
Mr. Crawford reuiled—l took the ten bills down to Liver-
pool for the purpose of roosiving a dividend on Oliver's mats.
I went at earl of Oct., 1855. I received a dividend at Liver-
pool on 24,0101. It was 2s. 6d. in the pound. I returned
to Liverpool nut morning. I made a memorandum oa the
ii.t at Liverpool. I saw Mr. Cameron on my return ; the
bills were stamped with the dividend which had been paid.
I think I handed the bills to him. I believe I told him that
24. or 2s. 6d. further dividend was anticipated, I made calcu-
lations of the amount which wee likely to be received
from the other parties to the Mile I believe that I made those
celoulations by Mr. Cameron's request and that I showed
them to him after they were made.
Mr. James—All the other parties were not bankrupts.
By Mr. D. Seymour—To ohs test of my belief I showed
the cabala/lons to Mr. Cameron. .

(A Mot of the es—kglitions wasglven in evidence.)
Crosemzeroined by Mr. James—The actual debt was reduced
by dividends and other payments from 24,0001. to 13,0001.,
I believe 2e. Bd. more has be paid cm Oliver's estate ;so
that ts. li. la the pouna has base resolved by the bank, ta-
=of the securities of other parties, Ido not know
another dividend is promised.
Mr. James pointed out that the VeR4MIIII assigned to Oliver's
truism wore valued in the deed at 838,7501., and that there
was a condition that they should not sell them by private
contract for a lees anm. _ _ _

mined 'l3 Mr. D.' Seymour—Mr. Cameron
led me to understaad that Mr. Walton was virtually respon-
sible to a tertein extent for Oliver's debt—l can't say to the
almond of 13,000 i , bat to it considerable extent. Mr.
Cameron Insisted on that view of Walton's liability until the
close of the beak. _

Ro7aersehaedZWaltoa's MUDS r not to any of those bills.
To Mr. D. Seymour—All the diaconate fur Mr. Oliver
were obtained through Mr. Walton. He iatrodnoed Oliver
to the beak. I believe Mr. Oliver had a disootutt account
with the bask.

Mr. Paddien proved the execution of deeds by the direc-
tors of be bask in bankruptcy estates. The first was • deed
dated Nov. 28, 1864 winding up the estate of Means. Bel-
Janne aid Orr asdar nepeotion. In this deed there was
no discharge. The next wee a deed of composition in the
estate of Oster Pryde, executed on the 22nd of Jemmy,
= another
oompositioa bong 4s. in the flollod. Then was
la the agate of /ink and Pm nin, dated Pa. 16,
1858, for 4s. ad. la the pound, and a fourth in the estate of
Wilson and Company, dated Yank 7, 1866, for Is. 4d.
Mr. Patrick JeUsea auesined—l en /tee stings in the
estate of Robt. Jackson. He berme a baaknt ia Novem-
ber, 1864. He paid a dividend of 2s. Id., a his anns is
nearly exhausted. I don't think time will be mother
dividend. . .

-6roes-examined by Mr. wale ship-broke,
in London and was oonnected with Mr. Oliver, of Liverpool.
He wee the drawing-post for the hones and when it stopped
he failed. Jhelum was a respectable man in hia way, but not
a man of large means.
Re-examined—The bank did not prove legalist the estate
of Jackson, because the titles they held wont not true. One,
for instance, purported to be drawn at Husks°, when it was
actually drawn asLl
The beak was entirely innocent of any privacy in the
matter.
Mr. William Croeeley—l was the accountant to the estate
of Alien end Andersen. which Is finally wound•ap. They
failed in October, 1854, and paid 4s. in the pound—one
dividend of 2. and two of la. each.
Orcea-cormined by Mr. Jams—They were Irish factory,

•
and carried on buainees Si Hibernia Chambers, London-
bridge. They bad been In badness many years, and failed
in cooaegoeaoe of the failure of Liverpool houses.
Mr. Paddison re-called, said—On the gist of December,
1860, a committee was appointed to eit every Friday to con-
sider past due bills.
Mr. Atherton said he now intruded to proceed to the
debt due to the bank by Mr. ll'Oregor, the first governor.
Mr. Anderson, re-called, said in reply to Sir Y. Holly—
The amount of Mr. Oliver's debt at the date of the balance.
sheet of the 30th June, 1866, just before Mr. Stapleton
became a director, was &nt 17,0001. Down to the failure
of the bank that debt was never increased, it was decreased.
By the Jury—That wee the amount in the past-due bin
book.

To Mr. D. Seymour—l believe Mr. Cameron stated to
me in conversation that he believed the whole of Mr. Oliver's
debt would be recovered.

To Sir F. Thesiger—He stated so while the bank was
going on. Mr. Oliver's deot in November, 1865, was
14,000/. , making allowance for all that had been received.
In reply to lb.. D. Seymour,
Mr. Paddleon said—l have heard Mr. Cameron express an
opinion that Oliver's debt e ould be menaced. I do not re-
collect his saying Mr. Walton would be liable. He spoke
strongly about Mr. Walton, and said he was morally re-
sponsible, though his name was not on Oliver's bills.
Mr. Paddison, examined by Mr. Atherton—The letter pro-
duced la written by Mr. McGregor to Mr. Cameron. It was
dated 25th February, 1860 and said his time was constantly
occupied in parliament and by other duties, end that it wu
he should guard spinet pecuniary inconvenience
IdmiLinesarle session. Formerly, he could get what he wanted
from Drummond's, but now his connexion with the British
Bank placed him in • position of difficulty as regarded that
bank, and any application by him to it might emits suspicion.
He should want between 5001. and 6001. on his own personal
security, and he did not ase any reason why a director should
be placed in a worse position than an ordinary customer.
That letter was produced at the finance committee on 25th
February 1860. Bedsits, Gwynne Owen, and Hertz were
present. The application was agreed to. Mr. M'Gregr's
note for 1,0001. of the 26th of February, 1862, at three
months, was discounted by the bank. On the 22nd of
November, 1854 • ascend note for 2,0001. at ex months,
was discounted for him. On that occasion there was a me-
morandum, signed by Mr. M'Oregor, handed to the bank,
making over to the bank, in consideration of various
=thee advanced to hint, several life policies, scene
government stock, and shares in different companies.
The money advanced consisted of the following
items:-1441., 1,6561., 1981., 3061., and 2,3761. The
securities remained in the hands of the bank until the
failure, but the bank received nothing upon them except
8001. government stock, and 1,0001. on the policy on his lib.
The other policy dropped from want of payment of premium.
It was in the Merchant and Tradesmen's office. Mr.
11.0tegor's note for 2,0001. has the Weals of Mr. Owen
upon tt. It is usual for the director present when
• bill is discounted to place his initials upon it.
There is another promissory note of Mr. M.Gregor, dated
25th June, 1854, for 1,0001., payable to the bank eta months
after date. There is also one payable at sight, dated 16th
Jan., 1863, for 5001. It is signed with the initials J. P. ;"
another dated 30th June, 1868, for 1,0261., at six months;
others for 1631., dated 12th September, 1863, at six months;
for 1,2001., dated Bth November, 1853, at six months (it is
Weaned by Mr. Mullen) ; 300)., dated 9th August, 1853, at
six months. ; Some of these may be renewals. In
January, 1854, Mr. Cameron requested me to at-
tend a meeting between him and Mr. M'Gregor.
An account, in the handwriting of Mr. Crawford, was pro-
duced on that occasion. It showed that Mr. McGregor's
liabilities amounted to 7,3701. It bears the initials both of
Mr. Cameron and Mr. hl'Gregor. There was an estimate
taken of Mr. M'Gregor's securities ; it bears Mr.
Cameron's initials. There is an assignment of these
securities, with a power of sale to the bank. The total
estimated value of them is 5,4661. In February, 1855, Mr.
Cameron ceased to be a member of the court. On the 27th
of February, 1831, there was • letter from Mr. WClregor,
dated from the Athensuum Club, to Mr. Bedsits, alluding to
hie account. Subsequently another letter from Folkston
was received from him, in which, addressing Mr. Cameron,
he said he had relinquished hie house in Princess-terms,
to avoid the expense, until parliament met. He also said
suits bad been threatened against him by a dock company,
observing, " How is it they fire at poor me F" I don't recol-
lect submitting this letter to a meeting of the directors.
On the sth of Juno, 1855, there was a meeting of the iiireo-
tore. I then Mated that Mr. Ill'Oregor's shares In the Irish
Peat Company, held by the bank as security, would be for-
felted melees calls recently made of otlder share were made
by the bank ; 61. bad already been upon them. It was
ordered that the arrears be paid, if the solicitor could obtain
legal transfer of them. On the 12th of June I reported to
the board that there could not be a legal transfer with-
out lodging an attachment, and afterwards applying for its
removal. The result was, in the end, that the bank refused
to pay the calls.
Oros-exernined by Sir F. Kelly—At the date of the
balance-sheet in June, 1863, Mr. M`Gregoes debt was be-
tween 6,000/. and 7;0001. Mr. M'Ciregor's securities came
to me after Mr. Mama' death, but sealed up, and they
remained so foe some time. I think they remained in
my hands until the failure of the bank. Most
assuredly these securities were spoken of at meetings of
directors in 1866 and 1836 as being almost worthless, except
the 8001. stock, and what might come from the policies on
his life. Several of them are marked by Mr. Cameron in
the list es " nil."

Crora-examined by Mr. D. Seymour—On the 19th Sept.
Mr. M'Gregor wrote to Mr. Contemn that if he were net
attacked be would make a strung effort p 3 pay.
Cross-examined by Mr. James—Mr. F..sUile merle] him-
self in February, 1854, to bring Mr. M'Gregor to book. At
that time Kr. bl'Greger was in good repute. He had bees a
secretary to the Board of Trade and then M.P. for Glasgow.
At that time I did not doubt his reeponaibility. Ho lived in
style at Prince 'e-gate. These circumstances gave a prestige
to Mr. M'Olegor, and he was generally believed to be a
highly renewable, most honourable, and reasonably respon-
sible wan. I have • recollection that Mr. &dello complained
to Mr. Cameron very strongly that advance' bad been ear-
reptltioaaly mado on the initials of Mr. Mullin" without
pang regularly before the board. It wee complained by him
after Mr. Mullins's death that advances had been made on
his eignature to a very large amount aurreptitiously and
behind his back and that of the rest of the director".
Money bad been advanced to several thousands in that way.
Mr. Mullein had the entire confidence of the bank to my
exclusion, and I had no participation whatever in those
matters. I was honourably end entirely_ aeiritted of any
complicity with my partner in them. Mr. Radiate repeatedly
and strongly complained of what my partner had done.
The witness was under examination when our report left.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
SECOND COURT.

(Sittings at Mal Priam, in London.—Balare Mr. /milks
Willem, and a Special Jaiy.)
AgTON AND ANOTHER V. HUDSON AND OTHEE3.-BROXERS

AND THEIR PRINCIPAL.

This was an action to recover the sum of 2021. Els. Id., a
balance claimed to be due for yellow metal sheathing sup-
, plied for the ship Forerunner, and the question was upon
whose credit the metal had been so plied.
Mr. Hawkins 'ippon ed for the plaintilb • and Mr.
, Knowles, Q.C., and Mr. Rumen for the defendants.
Ihe plaintiffs were oopper and yellow metal merchant', in
Philpott-lane, and the defendants were ahipownere at Sun-
derland, and they owned the ship Forerunner. The Fore-
miner was built at Sunderland fn 1855, and Masers. Reynolds
and Service, brokers in London purchased one-fourth ENO
of the vessel. She left for Madras In the latter end of
but run aground on her outward voyage, and suffered con-
siderably. She discharged her cargo and returned home in
September, 1856. On her arrival in the Thames, she was
sent to Fktcher's Dock, at Llmehoure, to unload. This
was communicated to Means. Hare.' and Mr.
Ralph Hudson came up to town. The vend
was surveyed by Mr. Carr, _ and one of the
defendants gave orders to Mows. Reynolds and
Service to ripply the metal; which was afterwards ordered of
the plaintiffs. The invoice wee furnished to Mears. Rey-
nolds and Service, who were acting se brokers for the
owner , and they forwarded it to Maws. Tinda/l, why were
Whig a. brokers tor the undewriter., and after the claim
bad been settled, the invoice was forwarded to the
defendant,. On the part of the defendants it was said
that credithed not been pushy the plaint iff. to thadtdends^
but to Messrs. Reynolds and Bervlce, who had continued
part
owners until November, 1856. On the let of January,
1857, a bill was drawn by the plaintiffs, and aceepted by
MOWS. Reynolds and Service, but on the 6th January
Karns. Reynolds and Service drew upon the defendants, Sild
endowed the bill in a letter, in which they stated,
"We enclose our draft on you at as months for
yellow metal for Forerunner, and bare settled with
Aston, Griffith, and Co." This, it was said, bad been doss
to accordant* with the usual custom of the trade.
Mr. Hawkins stated three facts to the Jury, and attempted
to prove them, but his lordship exprered an opinion that it
was evident that the plaintiff. had dealt with Mesas.
Reynolds and &reeks, and frequently of the defendants.
The conequence wee that after some discussion a BOP
suit was entered.

THE POLICE COUltlB.
TIM DAY.

LXLISTMENT OT APPRINTICES.
A very respectable-looking man applied to the magistrate
under the following circumstances:
He stated that an iwpreatice, during the period of his in-
denture, had been enlisted for one of the regiments of the
line, and subsequently attested. His objeet was now es
claim him, ea he could not bo lawfully enlisted, or cow
palled to MOM Se a soldier.
Mr. Arnold inquired where he had WM attested ?
Applicant—At this court.
Mr. Arnold inquired the apprentices age, and tarot et bila
apprenticeship'
Said he wen taunt, years of age, sad Woe bag"
at pixteen, for five years.
Mr. Arnold agreed w.th the applicant thatlCMsppssiis
was exempt from service, and might be claib7 18'
master, but it was only fair to point oat the arawq
I. which the apprentice bad rendered histunif
lieMa
the 20th of Victoria. cap. 13, ear. Si, it was enassid fiat aq
apprentice who should enlist as a soldier, tad Amid
litYr
state to the magistrate before whom he was attsalad lit
sou not an apprentxt (which the party to this me DM

J'-

Mn, Loadoa-
amrs, mad Ltasel

of December,
Friday to rot-
proceed to Ito

.ret governor.
F. Katy—
of the halaace-
Mr. Stapleton
to the Wm,
was decreased.
se past•due

son statod to
of Yr. QUv

• dui teak mu
4r, 1866, w
ma mind.

IR, esprine an

bit . Ho spoke
ems ulerolly n-
ee bills.

-21 a• later FO-
- I t waa

warTonataattlY
and 'hat ,t was
UW.D,W4I7
what ha wante.l
with the 14;tiah
aa rogarde.l that
'telt* tropic ton.
ti. pertocal
I &actor about.'
inary rostonwr.
somata as Lith
ad Hata went
Mr M'Oroaoeo
1t42, at llama
hi the 22n4 ..f
at it enoatLa,
there was too-
k to tat took,
dna of various

Vii., I-.

I,:st cvspiaboo.
t. C4k.irlog
id 4376/...

Wait ;mill dr
* tem
Wiry ce b17(21.
wat af prusaitra.
a's s• .
lb d Yr. Otsse
• rripaawb:
Ill•thriss, dudteak is swath.
elgia timed 15th
Wee* "J. P "
M .la seetaths;
I. at is ustaks ;
▪ sissalssAls
A1105t..1.34pt

d w to at-
Mr. leCiroser.
syloid, woe leo-
Mr. 11,0meg/6
• !silk& both
sag so taikaiii•

It bears lir.
moat of tham
wok. Ibe Wel
miry, VA Mt.
I. Oat the 2711 i
a Mr. 111131. pr,
a.., slhalac

from FoMoho*
w Mr. COMMIS.
trisease-tennee,
4. Me Wee NM
d6clklwegaV=.:
et the Megaton.
Uwe at the direr
Wee la the Id*
n woad be Me-
ehan wore made
.et then. It wee
• c.-441 obtain
lune I matted to
dal wsw whit
• em tylag tee Its
the bank rifted

the date of the
or's d.Lt was be-
e neurvies rause
Id up, awl they
they winsweed in
• husk. Most
if at sentisys of
worthless, siorpt
as the pobrass on
Mr Cswerra In

it the 1...4b Rept:

it ►e mryte ii 34

le I lerlC I hint-
nor to ba k. At

He bad beet •
11. P. fey °lame.
obly. He lived in
re cave • primes
r Loured 4. be •
moveably ',Ton-
complained
tea ►a.t been ow-

Mullins Intboat
roaplaised by his
lad bras mock ca
mitTeplitxquly sad

I a I. tiir;rtcre-

sada la that way.
the beak to -y
whatever M than
ly vvrtitted of say
Pada tl. repeatedly
ter had "ewe. _

ell 061 report left.

LEAs.

lens Mr. husk*

rm - ■lO[ ISO

Of 2021. M. 11., •
441 .b this sop-
lallaiolll was apse

bUf~, sad Mr.
Mersdants.

;;;FeaenTisitt., in
ittipowners at San-
%mar. Th. Fon-
d Marro. Rsoidls
tot use-
p•rt
latter red 01.1666,

asisniktod ono:
d ndarowd bowe
• Intstwo, Jae woo
M untrol. This
*lds. owl Mr.
on. TM mod
▪ we at tbo
a. Soroslds and
border* orbood
▪ it• 111 town. Ref.
Idelon Mid
asTlaidt. maw WIMP
tad Awe lbs die

f 4 we ardot to tbii

;S•••11 11; ....I; W.llll odd
IC to Lb' deftnulsats,
bsd • -stisord
tb• I.t ul istsaary,
, sad owed by
the fitb JarsAry
di* asistsrlsats, sod
b they rostra,
eii mobil. for
Wise rifled mill
NM. W bees 4cire
M trod...
WY, 'tut sticreptad
Si opirlios that if
lash with 111 rows.
the delsosialatis

dida.rea..42 • WM-

Mel&

ICal.
4 o• the oftifirsto

he prima 4 IJ• is-
• volfteasto a J.
obkvi vas sew le
iseirel, at ear

I &Meted t

1.. sod Wrui of big

iiri, Nei was bora

by so
k•o•
kr=1..19;
garaisi sin
rod shwa Os*
▪ ri.uod obil •
vi • obi we boil