The Express.
London, England, 1859-11-29 00:00:00

t,an• istilltuinta.

WORT OF QUM'S BENCH.—Nov. 28.

&Mem M NW Prim .It., Mum, for Itiddlesm.—(Blows
Mr. Zarttm Cromptoa and a Common Jury.)
MALMO 11. TIOITILIIT.-TSZ MLA OF SALK ACT.

This was an interplesder hale to try the right to rozne
furniture at the home 46, Devonshire-street, Cavendish-
square, removed there from 12, Princess-mast, in the woe
The plaintiff is now • lieutenant in the 81eff irdehire
Militia, and in the month of November, 1867, being then in
some other militia, be advanced to i brother of the defendant,
Mies Tennant, a sum of 10Di, in two themes, receiving in
return a bill of sale for 2607. on furniture at 12, Trincom-
alee'. The brother bad ban a clerk to the firm of Beate
sad Cook, attorneys, the plaintiff in this action being $
Mahar of the senior partner. On the 25th of July last the
hissahnents on the loan not having been paid, the pisintiff took
poe•eedow of the furniture; bat on the Bth of August an
emnatie• was put into the house on a judgment
amine William W. Tennant, the defeedant's b;dOT:4
an • wrung of atttorney given by him to bor. The questica;
Om for decision vim whose property was the imitate, was
it Enloe or was It Min Tenant's.

There being no dlfferrece as to the theta,
Mr. Francis, on behalf of the defendant, took the objeation
that the bill of sale was made ander the Bills of &le Act,
the tick and 18th Vic., cep. 36. In the bill of sale itself the
reirrees was described as a gentleman, whereas be was either
ea sitom.ey or an attorney's clerk; and in the affidavit of
verification the attesting witness, Daniel Gardiner was old
Is be a etentkman, whores' he, too, was se atterney's clerk.
Mr. Audios Crompton held the objection to be fatal, sad
directed the jury to find for the deleadent, giving the plain-
tiff leave to more._ _

Vfiriciiorfiedefemdant soornellsgly.
Kr. D. Seymour and Mr. Cook appeared for the plaintiff.

COURT OF EXCREQURB..—Nov. 28.

Miami at NM Prins at Weseaalsetar.—(Balare Mr. Boma
Bramwell and Cameos Janes.)
moomi I. Till PAMIR 01 ST. MA/11.11, ummterrow.—

DIAIN•OZ.

Mr. M. Chambers and Mr. Jacobs were compel Our the
plaintiff ; Mr. Overeud and Mr. Denman repreuntsl the as-
ants.
This wu an action brought by the plaintiff, a publkaa,
who curies on business at the Boston Amu, Maiden... Lea,
wines the defendants, the Vestry of 81. Mary's, Winans,
for negligence in taking up and reconstructing some drains
which ran through his garden, whereby his property sod
trade wars Injured. TM defendants pleaded net guilty. and
Lew and herr.
. .

Tie wily session st bele in the Gess, which wee part
Yard ea esar&y, was whether the work bad been properly
doss in sot, and on this a bap reams of evidence, &key of a
solentilo (bander, won 'Adored.
TM leased Jed" Is sornaing up, left it to the jury to
say whether the defendants bed "stowed on the plaintiff's
lead with lids try" and bosun ; and secondly, whether they
bed been guilty of negligenas in the construction of their
work.

jplaintiff without
1261. having the box, found a verdict for the

RICHEQUBIt CHAMBER.—Nov. 28.

Mthigs in large. (BOW* Justices Williams, Willa',
Crowd's, and Biles ; and Banes Martin and Channell )
Till SAIL OF 11111STSBORY F. 1111111A8BUR7

lIITATIS.

In this ems, In which ea applicants had bees mode on Sa-
turday for a postponement of the ergument on the writ of
error,
lb. Baron Martin said he had reedved a Wier from the
Attorney-Demure), stating that the arguments had occupied
dm days in the court below, mad them was so reams to map-
per that they would occupy loss time is this court. It wee
therefor* imporible the* the court could take the OM daring
these neap,
Sir F. Kelly said it wee hi:moult:de to offer any argument
spina the statement of a gentleman at the bar, bat it sp-
paired to him rather rash in my gentleman to per such as
alike. He did sot think the cam would occupy more than
two days, sad ha would ask, would there be greater facilities
for bearing it after ant term f
Mr. Bina Hartia—l have merely meatimed that I have
received seek a letter. It will be boner to council the judges
I el the Qarea's Bosch, but I think it will be impossible to
dam • court. _

Sir Y. 1611 y said all he had to sak was, wbrAbat the case
would be lA= or not.

Mr. &eon Ch;iireii—The difficulty Is this. Then Chief
Jumbos of the Common Pleas oan Mks no part in this caw
booms it coma from that court, and the Chef Justice of the
Quesn's Bench cannot sit beams the teas was before him
w►en la tae Common Plea ; Justice Wightnum will hors
town on Friday, and I shall lens Seboday.
84 F. Kelly—Tbrrs as three Judaea from tho Exchequer
sad two from the Queen's Bench._

Baron Martin—The Chief Baron cannot gin up his
Wel mine sittings, Baron Watson wIB be in the Themes
Court, and Baton Bramwell at the Central Criminal Coati,
Baron Channel' and myself will be es circuit.
81r F. Kelly—l ma only oak the court to come to some
arrangement., Weenie it is a crying aril.
Yr. Berea Martla—l ma only suggest that you should
apply to some el the other Judy..

IIRCHAII e. WALIZZ.—INSOLVENCY.
In this CAN the question eras whether iIISOCIITSCIIIII la the
names sad residences of some creditors in the schedule of an
insolvent in the Insolvent Debtors Court prevented them
trot• taking proceedings against him. The Court of Quest'.
Demob bed held that toe ina=rscies were not fataL

The Courla;w delivered jaligmen— t,Colaing that the in-
secaracies were so great that the insolvent was not dieshergad
boas the debt, and reversed the judgment of the court below.
Judgment accordingly.

STRAY O. ROOSILL.—TILL ROYAL BRTTOIN DANL.
This was an action to recover 5881. paid by the plaintiff for
sixteen shame in the Royal British Bank, through his
broken, ?dews. Taylor and Ashton. They bought them
Prom the defendant, and she: tb• stoppage ei the bank they
kit bound, aooordiug to the usage of brokers, to pay the
amount. The plaintiff recouped them, and then wad the
defendant to get the money back.

ha the eami'was about to proceed.,
Mr. Baron Idsrtin said be had to go to chambers, sad
Yr. Justice Crowder observed be did not think it right that
four judges should sit in error upon a judgment of the Court
of Qaesn'a Beach.
The arfaoenta were therefore pottponed, and the court