The Express.
London, England, 1858-12-16 00:00:00

Irbs Oxpre...

TO 00.2111P00D11 TS.
AverefeemMe bdiedlel be Or "The lia=Las
Weals, ppee. mot be et Os 011ee. 10.
by Two OM* es On dig el pilgrim.

Too TITI ?MI Or TIMM. Irmo
Ilenwo>l MY. Silsbee& -TUltra
Or ORA Von sa-17.. • TOOoL•11 Or Des.-• Onwile
Pr de Dom-1M • SUMBA TO KARAT -Cower at I.

Ten Flinn. 111111je 111.1
..11111.DAT. - And
11141 1 JOWL NE. at I.

l aTr-Z:1 Ilm.lroom Mt umaLl WaMfdi PALMS. AND MI
are Itttrt.42.

lIIOR WALT= AT LONDON BEDS&
rte-toiaz.

LONDON. 77: DIY, DJC is.

Two or aims se the some aotorioes amen the
recent dsoisions in the new Divorce Coast ap-
pear in certain quarters not to have given
satishiction; and doubts are thrown out whether
the ledge Ordinary has proved himself quite
equal to the great sums of work that has been thrown
upon him. We cannot endorse throe strictures or
these doubts. With certain admitted sad well-
known faults of manner, Sir Cassewm.t. atitssirmx.
has, on the whole, discharged his very onerous
duties with singular ability and oorreepon ding onsoms.
Even those whooontend that the verdict in " hLtacm-
" sour v. Mzactiootr" has established a proesdant
dangerous to the stability of the marriage state, by
giving too lax an interpretation to the legal defini-
tion of cruelty—will admit that the law WY laid down
with perflect correctness by the Judge Ordinary. So,
again, in " EiAss e. Beans aid holitiosos," the
verdict has been deplored se tending to encoring,
that most odious of all practices—the practice of
relying on the evidence of private spies. With this
supposed result Sir C. CZESvWELL has nothing to
do, for it was not he, but Mr. Baron MARTEN,
who tried the case. We do not concur in
either of the above opinion. In the
MONT CYO the circumstances were so entirely ettosp.
Bonet that it can never be drawn into president 11
it can never constitute a binding authority is aaatbar
ace; it can amount to nothing more than the Judi-'
ment of that particular jury on that particular est
of facts. In "Seams v. Rontosos " we think the
verdict right ; and we deem it creditable to the jury
that, in compliance with the direction of the keen-
sighted ledge by whom the case was tried, they
should have fixed their attention on the proved
Auniliarities that had taken pleas between the par-
ties both before marriage and after, rather than on
the odious nature of the evidence by which a por-
tion of the facts were sought to be established. At
all events, the Judge Ordinary cannot be made
responsible for the result of either case; he did
set try the one, and in the other he so laid
down the law that, had the jury followed his
orideatinening, the ism would have been altogether
Eillerset.

The priseiple of amides is the are of " KW'S e.
LIM and lionlatrise,"se reported Ws oer isapreimiea
a yesterday, may parlor sdasit of more geodes
Weed the ledge Ordlzary himself did sat evince
hie anal asehienee in the comets's* of his own
eimeheism. The hen of theme mars are anhetanately
se ewe be be familiar to the public, that be mho se
them Is detail would be ea idle repetition of a saner
time whisk it is enplemaat enough to be obliged he
tell ewe. The point ea whisk the are Waned
wee a very abort are. The whitey was alb
mined—in het was gagreat and shamekwa It
bed bean carried on at rasa, platee—enionget
Mien at Dublin. The husband had been pot
le All peneemion of all the eMdesees of hie wilds
gelk deem to the close of her stay in Dablin, se early
es thee/prong of this year, when the dimes nit wen
mommeneed. In the mann of the Amman attimqple
were ands by the wiles family to twin &bent a mesa.
AWE& haebemi, a person apparently "of
• shame Mika as wall as of infirm character," was
Ind be haws that therviassee sobeutted to lain bed
less measted by the ens of hie wife'e --demo. H.
aped lea meeting. It took place late last weed ,at
tae lam of the erife's brother-in-law. The vet Me
thew it deiced to disband (shish see Wes)
est do had mast ens her panisrear aim she iset
DAIL The huhead. epos this laid the byelaw-
Wave that he horns bar 1 tied old le lie tells
Welk sly deer, I hope we shall toderass4 sash
" ether better, bat we west sot revert le fie past'
The istiareiew laded bye proialee ss the hooka&
pert Se go sad see the wife et St. Lossavels where
she we thou residisi t e promise shish wee sot
heyt, owing to his having gilled es hi attsrsey Ise
the way. To meet this evidence of alleged masa&
this essaterseidsses wa tendered sad resolved to
rhos Chet the wife at this interview had devolved the
'.dead, end had, in he, renewed the adaltereee

lat•ssnw sitar leering Dublin.
The wain quake is the ewe wee, whether on
Am beta there had been any eendonation. Sir

Cessowat.t. Cassava'. defined Oondonatio• to mow
not • more nmiscion of the imputed aims, hat a
remissisa ascompanird with the intaglios of restoring
the party offending to the same position as formerly.
Unless Mr. Aiwa, with full knowledge of hi
wifo's adultery, had resolved to blot it ost of hie
mind and take her to live with him as his wife
again, then. awarding to Bir C. CIZISWEIJ, there
was no condonation. The Jury way to fled whe-
ther in feet ha did so intend or not. Ono of the
Jar, he a long time reflood to sordhos himself to
this view of his fooetions. Hs did not like the
lodes oxpositMa of the law, and declined to limit
himself to a more verdict on the het& Whatever
may ho thought of Sir Cassava:. Cxesswiu.'s
szpositios of the law, there osii be little doubt that
kir mods of bringing this ?oblatory juryman to a
dos seem of his position was ado:datable. Nothing
to so deeply wanted as a snow, and few things
are loos becoming the dignity of the Judicial Bench.
Sir C. Glissowati. has anlockily lather a tarn tri
miss.. BTION, though ito dwarf it win (OM
we do not) to indulp " in an habftral stern of isost
belated it to be 112114011, even for a coseparor, "to
" wear it ever on his lip and brew." It is wows
pigmy la a Judge. A British juror has no admire.