The Express.
London, England, 1858-06-08 00:00:00

IN it CM IL= 111DRIICL LIZ/.

Kr. Flood renewed his appliostion for a oertiorsei, to bring
op frau the island of Bt. Mises an indictment for a felo-
nious assault, sad all proceedings thereon, and also for a
writ of habeas eorpus to bring up the body of the prisoner.
The question was whether the jurisdiction of this court at-
tended to that island. Tim learned counsel having referred
to royal ordinances respecting the Island leaned in 1837 and
183$, end to numerous authorities,
The court said they would look over all the documents,
sad intimate their opinion on a subsequent day.
CLARA C. TURN

DIBIPUTIB.
This was a rule to show cause why the too_pirage inan arbi-
tration between Mr. Vincent Turner and Mr. Edward Raw-
son Clark should not be set aside on the ground of the im-
proper admission and the improper rejection of evidence by
the umpire. It weezed that Mr. Tamer and Ur. Clark en-
tered into pehi
.11? to keep rac•-horsee for their joint
profit, and a dispute having arisen between them with re-
gard to the accounts and other matters, the whole subject was
referred to the arbitration of Mr. Charles Oreville and Mr.
Wallace, who had power to mdl in Admiral Roue as en
umpire, in the event of their At'rpeeing. The arbitrators
did &Negros, and Admiral Roos haying been called in, he
made an award, ordering Mr. Turner to pay to Mr. Clark a
aim of 4601.

Mr. Edwin James now showed cause against the rule, sad
referred to various affidavits to prove that the umpire bad
beau guilty of no miaccaluct.
Mr. Lash, on the other aide, said Mr. Torre put an end
to the agramant into which he intend with Mr. Clark, on
the that the latter was going to run horses frandu-
hr certain noes, and be complained that Admiral
sous bad declined to examine him (Turner), and to
remise other evidence with regard to that charge.
Lord Campbell said it seemed from the affidavits that Ad-
nrsi Rona thought the matter affected the honour of the
turf; that it ought to be heard by the Jockey Club; bat that
it had nothing to do with the inquiry before biro as umpire.
Mrar . Justice Crompton—Was the charge inquired into by
the bitrators ?

wafameo—Not a word was mentioneei to than
on the subject.
Lord Campbell said neither party could brag Dow mattes
hems the umpire. As the charge was sot mole Won the
arbitrators, the umpire had DO power to deal with it, eves If
It had been brought under his notice.
Mr. Justice Coleridge—You moat bang Wm, the umpire
prenisely the sane matotiols which came beim the arbi-
trator&
Lord Campbell—The rule must be discharged with oasis.
Rule discharged accordingly.
SCULLY V. itiORAAL-THR SADLIER FRAUDS.

This action wee brought against the defendant for fraudu-
lently representing to the plaintiff that he had purchased
from Kr. John &ether, doomed, an estate belonging to the
plaintiff, under the Irish Encumbered Estates Court.
The declaration stated that the plaintiff purchased the
estate in that court through John Badlier, ea his neat, and
that he employed wilier to sell it for him at a profit, and
that Sadlier informed him that be had resold It, and at •
profit to Ingram. TLe derlaration then averred that the
defendant &hely represented that be had bought the estate
been &Wier.

Mr. Bovill, on the part of this defeudent, wow moved for a
role calling on Mr. Scully to Meow cease why certain interro-
gatories should not be administered to him. The object of
the interrogatories wee to prove that &dill'r wee the real
purchaser of the estate.
The smut granted a rule sist.

The called th. &hanks of the horsed commis-
sioner to the cirmunetenote of the saes.
Yr. Comnsistioner PhlUips said the inealust was not
opposed, and he should not stand in the way of the poor
men being diwtherged.
The Regishar amid the anal order wield be appointed far
the 30th UMW, sad then the &charge would be granted.
sh, Haber remarked that as the debt was for owns, ft
most be so. He would be Mecham,' as soon as the law
allowed it.
The day was named for the final order.