The Express.
London, England, 1858-09-15 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, WEDNESDAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1858.

Katy intelityritt.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS COURT.—SErr. 14.
(Beton the Chia( Comattadoser.)
IN ZS =DWAZD TNONLS ISAACSON.

This isisnimed, di7so;tiall issi;;;Li; ;Zia no business or
=ltwas opposed IL, Mr. Way for a creditor named
also by Mr. , for Morn. Rogers end
Rivkin, drapers, of Brigham. . Murphy, a tailor, opposed
person.
good and Mr. Reed supported.
la this case the debts and liatelitise were 3,0001., and of
that sum upwards of 1.3001. was without consideration on
accommodation bills. The insolvent had been articled to an
&Stormy but had never practised, and for a long time had
been assisted by hie friends. His father,. retired solicitor at
Newmarket, had allowed him 11. a week, and his brothers and
slaters had assisted hint. He had resided at Newmarket with
his wile's father, Mr. Chides*, the jockey, and broke up his
establishment in 1852, when ha went with Mr. Chiffney to
Brighton_ , and remainedtheresonte time trying to get employ-
ment. Whilst at Brighton he contracted • debt of about
421. with Messrs. Roger., and the last item wee for two &ilk
dresses. Ho denied that he had represented himself as a
person of property. He had been clerk for eight months to
the Crimean Army Fated and received 601. He had been
• oommisekin agent, and also sn agent for the discount of
bills, at the dna in Notting-hill, Surbiton, and Bury.
Mast. When he raised money on bine he put his name to
them, mad resolved • commission. Mr. Harris, the opposing
creditor, attended him as a surgeon, and after telling the in-
solvent he had money to invest, the insolvent borrowed some
money of him on • bill.
Mr. Murphy, • tailor, complained that the insolvent had
got into his debt, and had represented himself as a person of
CLTy--a statement which the insolvent on his oath

Yr. Way and Mr. Denney submitted that the insolvent
had lammed debts without reasonable expectation of pay-
ment, tat before the case could be adjudicated upon the m-
aole•t should be required to describe himself ot the °coups-
does he bed Sonoma.

Nr.BBrgood eouriii;red that there wu a great latitude on
= Mks whether debts had been incurred without rea-
lm. The insolvent had been only a short
time ea Mtiving before auffend four or five months' im-
prisonment. When be bed completed the ameodmente re-
quirod,rlr.lthe court would consider that he was entitled
to his
The Chief ' &.•••• Wagoner went over the complaints of the
auditor, who opposed, end was of opinion that they had a
good cause to complain of the hasolvent's conduct, who bad
gone on incresaing his debt., and having been the greater
Mtnof his line out of employment, bad only his friends to
for his support. It was necomary that the insolvent
should describe himself of the Crimean Army Fund, and of
the jobbing business be bed dome in the Moment of bills of
sulange. As a new advertisement would be respired, and
some time would elapse (es be did not latisd to rem, the
conahancs), primp the insolvent would have
=l. on reaufficiattly when he sent came beim the court.
The aide woe adjourned elm

IN at WILLIAM NEMESIS.
This insolvent, who bed kept the llkies Head, Old Coop-
tetostrest, Bobo, was opposed by Mr. Read for Macon. Lo-
ma a Hart, the datillen ; end by Mr. Dowse, for Mr.
trtiLikrgood the
In January lest nsolvent gave Marra. Lemma Hatt
his lint order fee spirits, and promised to Mr. Jaooba, their
traveller, that be would pay the duty which wee 161., in a
week. In February the insolvent sold the husinam, throngh
Mr. Resell, the tanker, but he did not inform him that
Messre. loom Hart were creditors. 2001. was noshed, end
the insolvent paid 1211. to his nephew, a bootmaker, of which
sem 1001. was alleged to have bass advanced on the lease of
the house. The insolvent had 761. lait, and paid nobody, as
the creditors retuned an offer of fee. in the pound.
The Chief Commirdonar was of that Messrs. Hart
had, with the other creditors, • t to complain of the
meaner la which be had treated t espedally Meseta.
Hart, to whom he had offered a composition which would
amount to 101., when the duty they had paid was 161.
The court gave a judgment of eight months for making
away with property.