The Express.
London, England, 1859-02-19 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, SATURDAY EVENING, FEBRUARY 19, 1869.

telegraph, but finally left I/abatis en the lee day of
October. Up to the time of the second starthregf the 'a-
pathies Hr. Woods' salary had been regularly we • hat
Tam that dale down to the period of hie return to London
be bed beam pith nothing by the defendant. At that time,
therehre, Mae 26/. wee due to him, and on calling at
theta:a to receive It the cashier informed him he mold
nee pay him any money except by Mr. Xmas' authority.
That gentleman's authority was consequently taught, but
at em Werraw which took place between the plaintiff, Mr.
hems, and Mr. Fowler, the plaintiff wee informed that Mr.
Jobastone, the Meads:it, bad given orders to pay no more
money to the plaintiff, ea he (Johnstone) did not consider
Mr. Wo,de to have been on the eetabliehment of the
thew* Herald since the 17th of July. The plaintiff's
mooed demand, therefore, seas directed to recover the sum
of 261., alleged to be due to him ea his salary from the
17th of August to the 6th of October, the date of his formal
dismissal from the defeedent's employment. With regard
to this branch of the inquiry it was alleged, on the part of
the defendant, that as the plauitiff had broken his contract
with hint first, in sot returning to London alter the
lest expedition, and resuming his duties tiler° roundly,
la esteem; into en inemement to contribute to the columns
of the Hesse, unauthorised by the defendant; thirdly,
in sending manifold copy to the iferitiay Herald,
instead of, as ter agreement, sending Lr the exclaim me
of the journal a long and special report; 'earthly, la
not coldest Mg hinted( with sending abort sketches to the
other papers ; that for all three reams, the plaintiff bad
die-
miued howl, from the defendant's employment. To that
th
e plaintiff
replied that he had remained in ',eland, and bad
on the second expedition, list, because be was not
recalled, and the defendant keen vary well where to write to
him; sad, secondly, because his was "to give
am amount of the laying of the ea " and ha therefore
pleaded his contract would not have hem completed
ashes he bad done so. Aa to his undertaking
with the Thin, that be was compelled to enter
Into by an arrangement with the company; while,
lastly, as to his supplying the defendant with manifold
meets, he had never agreed to do anything else, unless
tine allowed of it. Bat, moreover, the dethedast bed
oreoped the contributions of the plaintiff on three or four cm-
melons subsequent to she 17th of July, and had meted
them in his mere as from "oar own correspondest." How-
ever, against- that the defendant attempted to show that all
mob Wises bed ton espied into the Herald from the Hs-
prose end segued further, that the het of the pro-
=Mof ftglftem having published the plaintiff's
k Utak paper_, the Expreas, showed plainly
thee Ohs gleasiff .41 Milne dld not preclude pahlicath n, in
the fret het iS thaewellthg mars. That podtion was
mot by the piehtlre mein that the proprietors of the
• Name Mut yes le the first halance, a single
mart in the ftevee peeing to the pabliostion of the
17* of eeptem; and that was only dome when it was
hand that the ehides contract with the Daily News
bad been nepeoleW bean by the deherthat's publishing
the reports as thry naahad him in the Doweiwy Berald ; but
euppeing tba Misled wen beholden he the imports to the
form, why MI be boded them is the Herald as from
own oomethenthett"
,Lestly the pleistiff chimed a
week's salary lerthopeded haermalag between his wrongful
diembeelhy the Mewled led Ms champion on the staff of
the Dear Awe el a seamy more then double what he re-
ceived dm the delleled. The plaintiff bed received a cam
of 111. Hs tam the Hews for Ids report of the soereemful
=elf
the dite cam ble,
ees evenalthoughi itng. hod appeared In the 3011411
of el
The jury hand he the plaintiff—Damages, 2W., width
was the tall meant addend, minas the 114 received from
the Aare

COURT OF PRORATE AND DIVORCE.
Pm. IL
Ohba tit, Judo Onlisary.)

Te•iiiiii:sr;iriTiWiss at Waltham-crow, 7.74 for a
divine se the 'toed of adultery sowersiteed by his wilt
with the co-respeadost.
Mr. Wordsworth and Mr. Tomer appewed for the peg-
their ; Mr. Lily and M►. Martin fur the tooprailente ; Mr,
Carr erawdeciad hie ome In person.
Theme levier been proved by the evidence of a servant,
knaTtesiory toned the lame of adeltery la favour of the

This was a salt kw • diverse, promoted by a wife sealed
her husband co the grew* al adalteg, enmity, sad deem,
fiat. Tb. parties were asserted at Worms* ha the year
1834, sad they had shseverde mail es bedew as pies-
terse mid theimmiter empseetsely. They bed lived col; on.
Myth* *I ream a* id *die emelt, were
mist the respandsaL Me had IA her some years
era mad reams was oh* is show that he hod lived with
maim mimeo at No. 4, liacksepreal.
Yr. liddheites. Q.C. a* Kr. iteM toe the
petitioner ; bed the resposil
peeseat*, wive bed eed a mad-
rrey did set e
eis C. Cples.reasweil that dielbreemireomisly soother of
these sow to Kish there mold be as bud sa to the cruelty
of the empoodesit sad the he had pat are the mooed,
without seeigring the suo peel* he It, was ot a piece
with the brutality he bed the* towards his wife.
The feud the hem at Ma sod amity, bed did
sat Goodie that the imp d deaseim had bees matte out.