The Express.
London, England, 1856-11-29 00:00:00

ILato intelligence.

;From Ist atitiVe " Omettml
CROWN OFFICE, Noe. 41.
Da7t tat for I,o:doci opeetal cambric= Moyer atta temaLin
.mJ god delivery, at the followleg places :
Nortban,tondure—Tbareday, December 1, at Northampton, ,
1 :-eolo.b. re, Saturday, December', at tba Castled Uremia.
L.:7 01 —The tame day, at tam City ot Lincoln.
mAtmettamelore -71tunctay, Dimmable 11. at Nottlaeltam.
Toon cd Nottingham—The eame day, at the 101111 of Nottingham.
Derbyehtre--eateMay, Deemeter 13, at Derby,
Wareekshtre—Wedmeday, December 17, at Wand*.
COURT OF QUEEN'S BE :ROIL—Nov. 28.

1T1V7....• AT :CAI AT

TA43ANT V. TUMID. AND

The plaintiff brought this action egaiett his wifee trustees
sada • died of separation, for the alleged breach of certain
@maniocs contained in that deed.
Mr. Oren, I, Mr. W. Pram*, and Mr. Brooks appeared
fcr the plaintiff ; end Mr. B. James and Mr. Lush for the
defendants.
Loll Campbell remarked that the first alleged breach
einced to be that the defendants had endeavoured to make
the plaintiff live with hie wife. (Lasslntr.) •
Mr. B James—And an-ther breach is that the wife wrote
three leans to her husband. (Renewed 'slighter.)
Lord Camphllf said it was a ud thing to make disclosers*
Of this nature in a public court, end uked If then was ne
mode of coming to an amicable settlement ?
Mr °wand observed that the action was only brought to
protect flea plaintiff (iota annoyance.
Mu B. James raid Le bad a viny good answer to the
acne., and nun Ma his lordship to allow it to go on.
Mr. Orsrerd tern opened the case. The plaintiff, Mr.
Tarrant, was a g• whines who had bees cossetted a greet
samba of yin with the law deportment in the office of
the Duchy of Lancaster, and is 18.50 he costracted a mar-
rage with the daughter of the defesdast, Mr. Tucker. A
algid was bora of that marriage; bat after they bad lived
together same time di.end uoae between them, and they
ematul!y agreed to eeparate. A deed of degrades was
drama up and eseeutsd in June, 1831, Mr. Tacker, and
the other defendant, Mr. Him, both rinsed neediness,
acnn as the masters. Under this deed the plaintiff agreed
to all ,w I i. wife an annuity of 601. a year for the main-
tenant cf Lend( end 'held, to be payable by quarterly in-
stemmata, and to furnish two rooms for her, to the esti/-
fat:ion of the truants, on her sada:taking not to disturb
or molest him is say way. The tomatoes then entered into
a covenant that the wife sboold duly observe and perform
the covesants of the agreement, and shoald not, either by
mcmi oval censure, eacitatios, or any other means, en-
deavour to ompel Mr. Tarrant to live with her, or to allow
her a larger maintenance.
Lord Campbell—The trustee, are suedes for the °heavy-
sate of that eouditlos.
Mr. 0 d—Yes ; and it is oar the (nosed that they
eave not observed that endiliss that this anion is brought
against them to recover damson.
Lord Campbell—What Alps ieglest m the measure of
damages ?
Mr. Orerend—l say the sittnite it Amster is the inns-
ne.sote the binned bee alliblad by Wild/ Monies Into
his house, and violently stand{ ieg Mai the Ms he has
sastund by a tamest Invite its Mlles Is ansequencie of
the disturbance, and the nesspent• d bag dud before
the magistrate. Bat it is set ell mask demagog we ask for
as the protintios of the keened.
Lord Campbell—This is really es nibs by a Mahon
against his wife.
Mr. Omen tees mended to state that Mr. Tarrant,
in anordance with a stipulation is the agreement, furnished
some lodOsits for his wife in the Southwark-bridge road.
In the month of September is the mass yeas Is was
astosished, Miss be retuned home sae miming, to lad that
his wife had (Med Merl late his Mouse at Peckham. BM
eassalted him and used nobs. Knitting,, eatt. that wee
her ems home sod ennead ass Mane it, sad costissed
to remain there fee tea dep. ffieMe apprehnsbro of her
violent, he obtaised • esimens ism ne magistrate with
the view of Monet her ever Mhos, lb. pate, an when
the case same es for Moen* be kfinit tor the drat time
that there ins a onepleist r M Ihe inning of the far-
sitars which he had Mir ladillalMilasfr was eventually
Man by his living bor min tar tnesiture. Frees this
pried op to 1864 'terrines west as perfenly regular,
Mrs. Tarrsat receiving the smutty tad set interfering is
any way with the plaintiff. Tim pintiff, however, beams
embarrassed sad passed through the laselvent Court, and
was enable to pay the quarterly isetalmeata to his wife as
he had previously done. la November, 1864, Mn. Tenant
west to his lodgings sad foetid her way in, and Isolated
upon riessaisisg, and did minis until 10 o'clock at night
her husband all the time tegeestieg her to p sway. Of'
this ogees ag sin she used violent ingsage, and threatened
to annoy him at the Dacht Klee, • threat which she
mentesily curled out.
Lord Campbell—l really mut repeat that it is a very sad
thong to try a ease of this kind in open siert. Whining
way the verdict goes it cannoteompua the disputes basses
the parties. Those disputes weld be men satidestotily
dealt • ith by Mile domains Innen
Mr. E. James—it is perfectly isapesibb to emu to any
arnegement. I shall show that this peer limas and her
child were left in a positive state of ellenellies for sizteen
mambo, and that it was vibes in this efts Kell she went to
the Daohy of Lasonstm Mlles. la hint* beams charge-
able to the pariah. The plaintiff has nee pill be Is. of
this miserable 80f. since llon.
Mr. Oreresd continued—The seat elep whisk Mn.
Tarrant tcok after eallieg at the Deny of Lameralar
lace was to apply to the magistrate to amyl her hishowl
to make her an allowaset, bat he donned le Istselloge.
Ale these proceedings of Mrs. Tenant Wen easy enmesing
and iojerions to the plaintiff• sad as the truism bed aide
thernsenes responsible for tier acts, be mainlined hest he
was jostifin no bringing this action spin{ aim, the
°beat of which he would most was siet oe smelt to re-
cover damages as to obtain prone:Man for the future upbeat
the repetition of such enselset.
Mr. TSfiebt, the plaintiff, was then ensained in ser•
robaration of these stational'.
Daring nice cromeasminatios several well writes* and
effeeties letters, sonsposed in very endearing terms and
sontsitics p retry, addressed by Mrs. Tamest to her hue
baud altar their separation, wen patinae's*, and the
ending of them created an isannesabigni• Ming is her
Imam mans the spectston in the soon
Lord Campbell ermaktd that in seed these the wile
semen en amognation with her husband.
Mr. B. James—That is oat of the newt benches.
Lori Campbell also observed that IM eases were quite
nail to the genial Mule of Milarle pastys
Is cram ezasaleatios the plaint/ admitted that he bad
net paid a farthing of the ansidey dose Illbesalmas, 1861,
but said he had been seed to theamay mart by Mr.
Tamer lateral times for the been sad inesesom of his
wife, and had paid gams of 1111,11/. 111, Mate the
sanity had been discontinued. Bs Maned Mes. Tarrant
had gone to the workhouse slam this maim bad bees
brought. The pariah bad not compelled him to make her
an allowance, but be had voluntarily offered to give her tie.
per week. lie now paid that sem to the clerk of the
guardians. Lis bed pats the Bs. for about thirteen weeks.
The Waiters be eupplied to his wife wee worth 601.
Mr B. James—la one loiter your wife offers to pledge
her jewellery to prevent your being committed to prison.
Do you call that a breech of the aernment
That was jewellery I bought for her, and it was taken
from my house.
Do you say that generous offer on the part of your wile
was an attempt to annoy you—a breath of the contract dea
which the trustees are liable ?
I say that from the whole Naomi( the letters het °KOMI
was to laden me to hold communication with lasso* Mall
the Minis themedves might have a right of amiss WWII
me fora besesh. (Laughter.)
But under the used of separation all her jewellery and
wetting apparel are to belong to her absolutely ?
I am aware of that, bat still 1 consider the jewellery is
alllte.
0 ler evideste Inviog bus adduced on the pert of Ma
plaintiff.
Mr. K. Junes submitted that the plaintiff ought to be
sessuited on the ground that as evidence Lad bees gives It
prove • moon of the enesante is the deed of separation.
Lord Campbell th tight than was some evident/es that
point to go to the Jury.
The leveed eaiitterl thes is en effective speedo es behalf
of she defeedasts comasentsd with some wwity on the
sensev aced cruel.y *heels th• plaintiff had tinned te his
wife, and mod the real °Nest of the gamest satin was to
intimidate Mr. Tucker tato suppottiag wife sad child, sad
thee to relieve himself of .11 statue fa regard to them.
Mrs. Tarrant, a parson of lods.like appeaseace was then
si 'mian. She skid she west to re ahem b:easise sae
had not mahout Inesiture for herself seed chill, but denied
bads, byes vi 'lent in her endued or used 'Maim ha-
page. She accused her husband *Ho barieg acted yin.
handy towards her when he attempted to ruin her rest. He
sever supplied her with may limn or kitchen articles, mad
she had no mossy to buy.
Kany.
la Met saaniastles n. Tinton admitted that he sant
her • ffinmesle dallat, sofa, shiffeemidee, mirror, chaired. 8e
bet she sailed that she could not cook food with this. thiem
Other evldeuce Laving been adduced ea to the defteiney
of the fanner* and the pressediags at the pellet coast is
1861,
Kr. Y. James and Kr. Owen tinnily addressed the
am. -...amp00l istimsted, during the latter loused gentle
man's speech, that be thought there Vail been a eoaduns
ties of what took plate at Peckham by the arrassientra
illabsequently before the magistrate, and that he wee also ot
opinion that the evidence Mewed that she plaintiff bed out
&Whin the stipolation is the deed requiring him to *apply
the fureiture within fearless days after the retortion of
%bedroom:oat.
Mr. Unread said that entities of reoSnioe co the part
el his lordship placed him m a pos.tion of oessidershle
&Meal, y.
A comedian*a the. took place between the weasel es
both sides, sad
Mr. E. Jell*. said they bad agreed to take a Mae'
parent for the Mindsets, end to shrew that the &bad •
sets wen sot miens. by any visdietive feeling, he might
state that they did sot jawed to ask for amts.
Verdict for the defendants.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.—Noy. 28.
AT 11111.1 PUTS ns 11011111.111T1 MOOS 111. MTN"
ANNIVALL ATI A MUM MT.
STOCIWILL L. WMOT.—AMBLOLT.
Ttb ine is satow to tee Iva/ domain Psi is welt sem-
daltted 02 the 3rd &rushee Isee. The pirriatdi grad 1w