The Express.
London, England, 1859-05-26 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, THURSDAY EVENING, MAY 26, 1859.

COURT FOR DIVORCE AND MATRIMONIAL

CA,IIIIZ&-NUT IL

(Bakes the Lard
Ordinary.) Chief Juana'. Bans Martin, sad
the ledge
I.IITCLIT 9. /LATCLII7 AND ANDWON.

Tide owe was heard oa Friday lest, sad reported la the
Lame of gatnrday. It was a snit far amen pro-
moted by Mr. R.tclil, late bairn oast sad paymaster la the
22nd Foot, on the ground of his wife's &debar, with
Col. Anacreon, of the emus regiment.
The court this; morning gave sentence. After diepodet
el someteohnicel twists relatiug to ib. proof ot the remiss*
sad the juradictloa of the court (the carom karts( beta
comatitted la labs), their lordships :remarked that then
could he no doubt as to the beet of adultery. The only goer
tion they bad therefore to deternibm was as to the oats. It
bad been °onion:led that the co.respoudest ought not to be
Bled epos to pay there, because the Ciente had entered
Cato a written engagement with not to pat biro
to any expeme In the event of his
Colima
nataa math-
dons. It wee tine that Colima Amiens. had
partially Walled hie undeviating. He WI paid
the unease of Its. Itateliff's eelthkle Ithofead,
red be hal 'Mowed her 1001. a raw kr Ise seetheersee;
het Shoe wee a tided iittpalatioa be bad net scoot
ont—he bed not "MOM the reglsawat net was a proofs'
ben width neither the the Mk Chaim Napyiler aor Captain
&Ora could oleo Ides; end the malt of hit not Mailing
the wheat oneement hot boo to aimed the pe, itioner to re-
tire ea hell-pay ; kir it wee obvious that two wen in the
pubis' ot the petitioner sadthe seethepesthet sold sot n-
oels Is tits mem esp. The te-eithesient snit; thro-
bs py the eats De. awalley, en belong( the raincoats;
vides ibe petilismer might be directed to make ems pro-
Theher
_menthe' ;
te but
then asthma aande to the application.

PPCZOVIi IP. PICLOIIIII AND JOLLIT.

This ono weepart heard on Saturday last, and woo also
repcood in the Erprou of Monday. Tbe petitioaar Is a
tutor is Maddox-street, sad tho adultery eras charged to
hays been committed with a lodger, with whom she wee
:=4.to have eloped. The case yea adjourned for further
Mr. Illorjsent Pigott sold that his client had not hese able
to Sod the person be whiled to call, but be contended that
X6was aftady iamb erldence to justify the court is
grandag a diveoute.

Atterwsouse dissuades,
Lord Campbell said the court was satisfied, sad.disecind
the marriage, ocadaanting tee co-raspoadeat i the costs.

[MO V. [IRO •!ID BROW/f.

The petitioner. Mr. Hoary Dapost King, married the
remendene, thee Margaret Madeline Mitchell, at the Maari-
the, in Aware, 1647. la December, 1349, the pallet tea
to garland, end afterwards they want to Mareetike, where
If r. King wee now carrying on a basisses. la 1866 Mrs.
Elog's health bring somewhat impelled by the climate die
weir snowed by her hasbeed to go Is her sister, a lbs.
Persons, at Boulogne. For three Wall vie eterespenfed
wi•lt Mee ; but miter that tiros her Mesa suddenly oseasi.
This reseed the pet.tioser's auspielen ; gad he misgiving
WOO sessiderably incretaid when he hum* that hie wile had
dams cm him to the mount of 70L laseasd of 201., and had
gone 4 England with L•rutearat Drew., et the Boolean,
the 00-reepondeet. On milling Artier Ipairiee he deep-
's/el that cm the Ted of September kat the paramour. had
Oakes a doable berth os board the ably Vance, and bed
soiled for Bombay se man and wife. lb. Brown wee ended
to be about 20 years of age, sod the respondent about 16 years
elder. liatehrtory evidence having brae given as to the
pititiimer's English domicile, and of the identhy °Me
reported Mr. sad Mn. Brows with the reeptadeate.
The court, co the motion oi Dr. Phillimen,Q.C., dimoind
the OWASIM.
Mr. (linty append be the reependent ; end Kr. Beesley
fire the co-respondent The letter learned platleasso prayed
that the eo-nepoadent might be excused the t of cone,
an the ground of hie youth, sad the therein's,
that be wog net the satlneet.

La ; most indicant set for hits to se
publicly oat to ladis wait Mrs. King se kis wife, sad what-
sose die age Its most pep the eo-t•.

DETAIN V. lIITAIN AND

- •
Is this came the hams et adultary had beat Ibmad by &jury
mama the reepeadeata ; but Mr. Utley (with whams was
Mr. Wham) reed a muter of adidarita,with a view to show
that the petititairr had Morel( beat guilty of aat
ad maleetadact whkh datataled hi., be the ramify ad •
Magna

Tie inert refined, however, to maw Late .aunts wNa►
night to hen bean p'.•dd in the drat ineleace.
Mr. Lille y than applied te their lordships le allot the
Menem' a some provider by nay of anion,.
that after nyettiaen years coveriere, in the oo•rv. rialliarra
elm War std bar basbaad to tarn a competence, ohs
•odd be left entirely deetitnie.
derjewst Pigott opposed the application, on tbs ground
that the tetiliweer was • person of ion:operate and
habit.. Tt. adultery which had bee. found tryPittr;
was committed with • working carpenter, who bad • wife and
Andrea.

Tie ceart di.s.drad the marriage, sad dirsetsd the pall-
gnaw la pay the stria el 8.. per work to the reap aduat's
=Weer as a toad for h. r (reepaadeat's) support ; but they
refired he cedar him to pay her oats. The only ground as
whack the monist of the wite's rata by her hasbaad could
be Imebard as wee the fear last an lanoorat party rhould not
be this Ist bring her damns properly baton the mart ; bat it
was chew t►at that room could cot apply where the suit
hal bola heard sad dlopssed of.

ILYLANCII V. 111LANCZ AND JONES.
Tho petitioner imam articled at kersehmler, but I.
11.13. whoa be contowtad tie marriage, Is ma only a
siitandlary clerk won a salary of 12.. ;et weak, which mew
stitutad .11 bia moms. His bride, alma maw rue Ma
Jackarm, war, bowerwr, • millawr, wet rersed U. a week.
la its tollowmg year, la come...imam of habits of Wear
Imam* into which she Mil, • aspiration Ink pleas between
lb. partite. While hying apart rho •••d• sagesiablace
of resat is J oar, who ma • performer m Pablo Faatierfs
Cirrus sad whom professional is.. ea. a serious Gallica-
Totowa court used —" Herr Fraareos,” Eorareallp tbs rr
spoodems cohabred se ma sad vide, aid they eves scat sr
bar r to COODONt bigamy. The citation ma mood oa tam
ha Coprilagas.
Dr. Wanibarit amino d ft, the petitioner.
Lad Campbell revels.' 11111$ 8M mart rhombi be tbe
'was of &trivia( reel same allow prelbarey es bad ben
deposed to is this cam, but there use as wawa why tM
peaks,' Amid not base kis divorce. Tb• wart would sot,
Muster, give bins kis mete, became it seenel are probable
that loess @append IN MN Niebidair Witt • lINSIINN.

ir witr.y C. YKAIISLET,
The petitioser, Mrs. M.rpret Yeesiday, was the wife of
Mr. Moen Ye.reley, • wee nierchatii, end she sought • div-
salaries of her marriage es the ground of her husband's
cruelty and eduliery. Tha caries were married at the
church of St. Magnum the Martyr, Southwark, on the 12th of
February, 1842, .nd had two daughter. of the ages of 16 .ad
16. They cohabited at Sheffield, in Lonadalwrquare, !shot-
ton, at Liverpool, and in Wm3p4e-strett sad osssr piss,. is
the metropolis. The reeptiadest had keg been is be habit
of ming image Lague,' to hie wile, and of violmtly
moulting ban. Os see minion be tore wady all the hair off
one side of her Mad. The witemace rated that many of the
quurele whisk look plate letwts& the parties arms fnim
Mrs. Female, felearlrotizg with her humbled about staying
out Ire at sight. Os am occasice be gave her • violas.
baring became ohs add It was too hoe to prepare supper
Sur Sir Robert Mem, • friend of
the reepoodltt. A
third groom' et damped. was her folds( to cleft •
Mr.. Emma Cando, eh*, she mid, we* • had woman.
Mr. Yarn* care took his daughters tome this Mire Castle,
sad thaffeirenasmaste gave rise to a quarrel. The sdulteey was
*barged to ham bra committed with Mrs Castle, by whom
he had bad the lame of • house transferred, sad with whew
M bad cohabited for @mond weeks.

Cerjeehi 9h7o.l‘.trpdike, Ud Kr. Prentka, appeared
See the petitieneF:

ford Campbell maid the am was • very aggravated one.
Not only .a. there clew evidence bilk of cruelty and of
eery abeadooed Wats on the p.rt of the respoodvnt. but he
lel attempted to do what the civil las• regarded a+.o cert.@
—easae_ ,ly to force hsa inistrem nes his wife There moat
M • dleinistice of the marriage.

IIESP. VTI V.
T►l wee • suit for • dreams oa the ground of •dttltey mid
amity committed by the hurL••d.
The parties were toasted et Birmingham on the 3lst of
July, 1833 , they lived at Btudeley, and bad a roe and a
daughter. 'I he reependfut was • person of debauched habits,
W mcording to toe evidence of sie of the witnemm he
supported himself by pawnlog hie wile's thiage. Mrs. Ben-
nett was a seedlemeksr. 11. had been ransomed four times
by the local auttioritite tor dl-greeting hie wife. Evidence of
adultery of • very direct ktad wets given. Mr. France, the
wlfe'e aftenity, stated that the respondent cure to him and
asked kis to stay In. prereediago. Witneee told him that
after the diselute eel abet:dote t life he had lel, it was an
impudent Oleg tor bite to make much a 'tercet. Rerpondert
replied, " Feuer thousand three hunacW mad niaety-two
Isar. in War 1.1 .11 gaol nutria in pay off ill old ect,rea. My
wife ha. been enjoying the fet of tee land, wh,la t wee &fag
oa 'hilly." (Laughter.) The pstulonee was • very
w0g..., sad for tweaty years she had been keep.
ing hi self sod her children la • ;reportable
newt. Mar hurtbaad, as the soli e heal, need to weeder
about the cowry ; every now end Ile a coming beck, Cl-
slag M, sels••g some piece of tantrum aid wiling
Dr. Dewar, , meowed for the medicare%
jAld Caftlfffall said that We was • a•e illudTallag la a

striking manner the utility of tha new law. The marriage
must be dissolved.

wALTON C. 'WALTON AND BIBiLL.
The petitioner in 1826 was a sergeant In the Rifle Bri-
gade, and in that year he mined the respondent, then Jae
Driscoll, et Minnie. She was the daughter of the landlord
of the Golden Boot, In that town. After 27 yens' service
petitioner obtained hie (linkage, and he is now a collector of
taus in Birmingham. 11. is upwards of 60 yens of age,
sad I. the father of eleven children. There lo a twelfth
child; bat its paternity is disputed. The co-respon-
dent la stated to be • much younger man, but be
ha had fifteen children. The two familia were
very intimate ; and on one occanon the co-respon-
dent went to stay with the Walton. while be had the
gout. On another oocasion he stayed with them for • fort-
night, while the hnotend woe at Diver. He was also a
frequent visitor while Walton woo engaged in hi. orlinary
avocaUons. When Mre. Walt.. worn loot confined, which
woo on the 6th of Dec., 1863, she warn attended by Mrs.
Hibell. On the 19th 'of Feb., 1866, the petitioner ha •
violent quarrel with hie wife, ad in a few daa afterwards
she left him, and went to the Htbells. A short time after
this a deed of separation was executed, under which the pe-
donee agreed to allow the respondent 21 per month for her
maintenance and for that of bar youngest child. Hibell
was-the trustee named in the instrument. Subsequently, as
It was alleged, the potitioser's suspicions wee excited, and
be commenced an action for crim. con. against Hibell, upon
which Miceli Immediately began • monger action for libel.
Both volts stood for 01.1 at the SWUM of 1866, but they were
refaced w arbitratice ; and the award wee in favour of the
petitioner, with •farthing damages.
The evidence ofdultery was supplied by a sense,
who deposed to baring Diboll'. voice is Ma. Walton'.
bedroom; and by ons of Walton'. daughters, who natal
that Walton'. own bed had sot been slept is on several of
than cassia.. The witness also stated that when Hibell
nos to ass her, mother she need to net her and he
*tor oat

One or Hibell's daughters was also examined; and A.
described tamiliatides which she had observed between her
father sad Mrs. Walton after she had own. to live with
them. Mrs. liibell had since let her Rimbaud.

Metes, Spooner and Scotland appeared for the pittitkeer.
The evert directed the petitioner himself to be emendated.
He gelded that on the 19th of February he heard his wife
v with the children, who sold they bed no bread.
He rettimemerasted with her, and she flew taut a violent gar
aim, abed • poker, and threatened to tuck his brains ant.
His timighhon,
_however, took the poker from bor. It was that
quarrel wed had led to the deed of uparetioe. On being
further geartioned the petitioner admitted' that to February,
1853, his wife wanted to go with the !Melts on • journey,
sod witness refused to let her. She dew in • memo and
swore abe would go without his leave, adding that if he laid
• Heger on her she would swear, her life against him, end
get Ida six months' imprisonment. Disgraceful rumours
had reached him about his wife and Hibell, and
he tamed them with the matter. He oleo charged
Hibell with being accessory to what was going es.
They all took God to witness that nothing improper had
*marred, sad at last pettlieser sad his wife were reconciled.
Seal, he sever believed that the hat child was his; he
thoeglit it wee Hikers. Nevertheless he executed the
dud of separstios, in which flibell covenaetel for 2L a
mon.h, never to let the respondent or her youngest child
become chargeable to witness.
Lord Campbell—lt Is quite clear that though the petitioner
could not seU his wife to }libel!, this deed of separation was
in point of fact an sesigement of her to the calespoodent.
The petition is dismissed.

The parties were married at Bishop's Wearmoutb, in 1844,
the petitioner being a surgeon at Sunderland. In about 12
months sifter the marriage the respondent contented a habit
of drinking ; sad on Good Friday, 1848, the wee takes in
the feet of adultery with another surgeon named Hallman,
now deed. The petitioner had obtained a divorce :1 menu et
thorn, and the repondent was now an inmate of a house of
mho in Edinburgh.
Mr. Jacob appeared for the petitioner.
The court granted a dissolution of the marriage.
BVPINTSB or THZ COVRT.

The amber of capes set down for heariag before the fall
Part wee 163, of which 37 have been disposed of during the
Gee days their lordship haws sat. Therefore there remain
116 yet to be dealt with, In ad linos to which there are up-
wards of 200 other snits In 'orlon. stages of tome/dames.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS OOURT.—MAT 25.
(Beim du Chief Censieseter.)
IN 11 CHARLES HIGHMORE PUTT!.

/Ids essa, whirl was Wore reported, was concluded.
Mr. Deans, sad Mr. Hawthorne • for two credi-
tor., sad on the braise occasion Mr. Hider Cantos was for
the Insolvent.

The case stood over to settle with the opposing creditors.
The insolvent had been bu nearly 40 yews in tbo Nervier, sod
held the brevet rank of colonel, with a ospiaitt's pay of *4471,
less income tat. Oa the former occasion the learned Coal-
missfaser suggested that 801. a yaw should be Set aside, or he
should foal it to be his duty to proneuntx an adverse judg-
ment for the manner la whkh some of the debts had Ines
contracted.

Mr. Hassey said his client had boa offered fie. in the
peak without security, which of course vss no offer
Mr. Hawthorne said no offer at all had been made to the
maim he repressatod.
The insolvent said he could not sat aside the rum proposed
sr Ir should only have Is 91. a day kh foe himself sad
beady altar nearly forty years sorrow.
The Chief Commissioner pronounced a judgment of six
seeds at the suit of the creditors generally, and eight
moths at the suit of Mr. Took (fur whoa Mr. Hawthorne
for contracting his debt without resaottablo expos-
IntiPile=.synsest.
The) mate ere ooncurnatt from the vesting order on
the Mk Febrwy.