The Express.
London, England, 1860-01-12 00:00:00

The imamate having ooncluded, the wort reserved
Adobes*.

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.
JAN. 11.
(Before the Jodp Ordfury.)
ANTMONT V. ANTIZONT.-.4INTINCI.

This vas a salt foe a judicial eapeesdon, ea the mend of
brought by the wife of an artist, named Merl An-
thony. It was Wield shortly Wore Christmas, and was
tally swirled at the time. This morning,
Mr C. Crams a ell pronounced materm He said the
parties were married in 1846, and bad had three children,
who were born in the years 1849, 1861, and 1863. They &p-
-ressed to have lived happily together till about 1861, when a
young women named Emma Bennett was taken into their
sorties. Ot Emma Bennett Mrs. Anthony became very
priori, as her husband well knew. On one occasion she
saw, or toasted she saw, Bennett sitting on his knee; but
Bennett dented that she had ever done leo. Oa another oc-
casion, alter the respondent bed begun to occupy a separate
apartment, the petitioner went upstairs and caught hint, as
ebs alleged,comingoatofßennert's room. Both the respondent
and the young woman denied that he had been there;
but he reedited that he woe not in his own bedroom, but
was it his etrabiner-roost. The court was not oadelnind that
the empradmil led been Ia Bionnett's apartment; bat Mrs.
Anthony hid at Meet rearmalde ground for samides, at
width Be salt laws been 0.1111•Mone' and he ought Mao-
ism to love bees rely menful sot to excite or injure the feel-
ings able wills. Tim serious acts of violent* had hem
premed. One wee en them:iron whoa a dispute arose *boat
the respondent's ordering Snot Dermett to make ten We
his. Mrs. Anthony seated that wins she heard her bar
bowl give the mkt to quotes she wound—`tThat warm
shell osier We my phew ;^ whersopea her Masa throw
Ursa at Ilowese, and threw her down as the door sat with
sash Asians that her costs worsen biotin, and she its.
sariveslip hut. The respondent and Bennett gene • dilwent
nesesse of Ilk tronsestien, slaging that when le desired
the polisser in nobs ores la hie she threw the keys at his,
▪ add Ms to maw Wilma :1 he amount of the injury
she inindlild was alw denied ; bat Mrs. Anthony
was easoberseed by Mrs. Duna, a imam who
was worlds. In the Mime, and wham evidence the court
thennitt ws ea the whole more entitled to reedit than
that anima inamt. It was of coons not likely that her-
many woad be petered to the homes while Bennett reasaiss4
ink; tat the respondent refused be direhsege ben. Af.er
this anew same wins was neesesd, end the petitioner said
the sensate asst have taken it They, la arm, 'barged
bar will Miring drink it herself, or with having mot it oat
with. Mao, Mr. Anthony accepted their versos et the
COON red that tear had alma Ueda Manhistoe his relations
with his wits. At Last bor health limas so Impaired that
Dr. Norton was WWI ia. Mr. Anthony said bet condidos

.~..

Ina soributable to her intern • by Dr. Dories told
dine that it was owing to doled. In August, 1866,
ths esepeadt us weg guilty qesnothar eon et *weft a, &s-
-pate bsd Sirlimpbost the_ natbsr e[ hovels Mil sod hi
Ins studio, lad ft Mad tai. Womb, aNg Cl SW *lir
hr swim • oilllegliillisa awned, is Ass able If wake
the j wee keens stetter hind vu tot. The
sip basing stack law a violist blew wit=
He amid, however, that be was se *booted at this occurrence
thee be
'ahaeirits Ara geard, acid
that he utter used 41blettes to bar sofa. In
MO as baldest' alto bconestml which reheated real &t-
-ooth ups lierrseptedenk Ifir hither having died it biome
amemuy ai pat the logy lane ateerniag, and be Mid Its
wife that if 011 a had kelt* that would-not ham bow maw
try. It appeared that be bed Awed bar 60l a year to p
away end that she had refused to leave Mo. Sea now
c to accept the Mean tat he would not pm It hot, for
add after a time Ma would p away Cl bog pea accord.
She toiled him how she yea to live. As said is didast see
any moselly kr her tot lire at all, ballet if live
dm might do so by prostinuloa. TW martwould haws
=bigthat If that manenent U sem M* the .nopenient
haw shows the graded easisty to matradist It, bat
tots weed #ll-1141 beam , denied, although he bad beta
Owed to the ha. With rammi to the moaralag, be had
pima his wits drams *mealy ithe these Maio mrealsts, sad
led rebind bar loam crepe wideit she had nand kir ,• bat it
mealy wad sot be a amisfamory Wag fir • alb M bs
We *sell it thews.loc ges her dorosedm Is 1866
aepeat was swan to km baton the petitioner with
for Eakin Itha to discharge Bassett. Ia
, 1866, while be was at Burnham Beeches,
W WSJ dIINOTI that Benaell hod seat her letters to the
respendeat ; sad she hit so mach degraded by this treatment
that abs took her two yosagest children and left the holm,
suing
itows.st to bar busband'e sister's, and than to ledginp is
Thu respondent bad shown a great want et
aandam to retinues to this steir of the letter. la the err-
resperisara be bad hod with his wife he spoke of it as if
Bearesit hisd acted al her an accord; bat is his Misses
before the mart he admitted that Beasett bed mat him her
reistran'e letter by his desire, bemuse, feeling that asithar
his boom nor hia property was safe in tbe pidtioser's
barb, ha was anxious, If poribis. to obtain sass evidence
' against her. In the negations, which followed the Napo,-
dunk promised that he would demise Beasts if his wife
would return ; but she &Amid to coma boos until Beasts
W been sonally sent away ; and having twice had quereis
about bar which bad ,walled in bar Wing beate%ie stessmight
well think that she had no guarantee, so hag as
la the house, that the eametklag might not atm =Loa=
wins wee Mr. latheny's Mower to all ads?
wee am plaided • sad, Weed, if it had both it would Urn
be try 2:misdeed by his own ~Nana, is, he elated
that he had reload to Tempi* dm pedigree. as • vile. even
Ones 1856, and that he oill adheied to the wee neolution.
The court felt Wand, tbwellon, to set ague the belabor of
cruelty which had ocea detailed by the wituseses sad admit-
tat by the remoodent. It would domes a judietel secant-
tioa, and direct that the custody of the children should not be
changed until farther orders.

SCOTT V. SCOTT.-81XTBNCL

In this owe the court refused a Judicial asperetion cm the
pound of cruelty. The reepoodaat woe a &mime, profli-
gate women, of whom her hiabead tumid so doubt be may
glad to get rid ; but there had hoes no aufiltiant evidence
of 'avid' cm bar part.

EMILLWE e. BAILIT.—ALIIIOIff.
Is this ease the wart greats.' the wife alimony, pendent*
lite, at the rote of 6001. per annum.