The Express.
London, England, 1866-03-28 00:00:00

LLW INTFALLIGEA. Ut.

(THIS DAY.)

EQUITY COURT.
(Before Vice-Chencellar eir W. P. Wood.)
yge irentima mower V. Till AUCTION MART COMPANY
Norryin)—Deirr v. VTR AUOTION MAW OONTANT—TIL-
WM T. Till AUCTION Karr nourxito.
Tees suits were instituted by three owners of property
ajoiming the old suction mart. to restrain the new wel-
-1 from se erect,ng their buiklisp as to diminish the
7lit sad air enjoyed by the plaiatiffs reopeotively in respect
0 oar respective properties.
The Vies-Chancellor now delivered julgment, end said
that after lobate and careful examination of the
ipitence, be had coin* to the conclusion that substantial
sad dial injury was done to the plaintiffs by
the WU of the defendants' compasy. Recent decisions had
no eight thrown much difficulty in the way of the °mut',
deiermicing what the amount of injury must be to justify
the interferes** of the wart. But in the present eases be
tett w heritatieu is his own mind in corning to the cousin-
woe that there was a substantial and realised diminution as
marded both light and air in the first two suite, and as re-
pidad light in the third snit. Under these eircumetwoes
time wart be a perpetual juju:obeli Se prayed by the bills
is each ease, and ouch portions of the building as had been
netted and infringed the several plaintiffs' rights must be
palled down. There would be a reference to chambers so
to this.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.
(Before Mr. Omemiesioner Hohe'd.)
A. D. lIDD.—APPLIOLTION POZ
The laskropt bed traded as e rtrawloinnet insnotacturer,
under the same of Archibald Dale. He dot
ing nervad Ms
application for release front custody, the tfor choke
of saliva's@ having takes plasm.
Mr. Downy supported Mr. Bredau opposed for s
creditor.
It appeared that ths beetroot hed failed tyke before,
end tad wood is acosintoodatios tessoactions. His
Bomar said it was sot a ease in old* tho wart fsit sailed
as to toe
its discr•docary purer discharge tram
ossiody.

(Before Mr. Conrardener Goulburn.)
111 BS SEDWARD.
The bankrupt was described as a patent limiest manu-
facturer sad coal agent, of Camden-town and Kentish-town.
This was the sitting fir alantioation and discharre-
"pines debts of 2,2161., of which 3.151. were in mot of
insenunedation bile, the meets wen returned at
Mr. Reed appeared for the bankrupt.
The Warms., is sal war to the court, stated that patent
harm were • othstitate for lath and raster.
Mr. Stamford, for the andspiess, did net oppose, and the
ceder was grsnted.
DI 11 J. S. HASSLES.
The bankrupt was described ass cattle lasperor, of Cam-
den-town. He owes to nameoured creditors 2641.
Mr. Enda, on behalf of the assignees, offered no ava-
rice. The bankrupt, it appeared, was one of the district
taperers of cattle reontly appointed under the orders of
mere Woad to reference to the settle Abeam
Order greeted.
Br in v. OAT:A=O.
The bankrapt, • commission agent. of King-street,
Overt-garden, applied for his order of discharge. Da*
TAX ; no meta, debts to the amount of 6991. kis in.
tared as bad.
Mr. IL Abrahams, for thirster., omplathed that the
bankrupt's sowers to the requisitions were extremely ea:
artistry. He understood that the bankrupt desired an
adjournment with • view to supersede the bankruptcy ; and
that he did not oppose.
Hr. Bagley, toe creditors, consented to an adjournment
ti the bankrupt's expense.
His Honour directed an adjournment sine die, with leave
to the bankrupt to have another day named on payment
of oosts. Protection was granted for ens month.
IX IS CAPTAIN BOSS/.
The bankrupt was • captain in the Royal Artillery, of
Woolwich, formerly of Balta. This was en adjourned
&Mier for examination sad discharge. The total
liabilities are 12,1171., of which 1,1724 is due ton nsecured
creditors, and 8,4551. is in reaper of aceommodatton ;
&mete, 3501.
There wee so opposition. The case had been adjourned
ate tomer sitting in order that 2751., rid to be in the
heads of the assignee, might be paid into the bank bat
this had not bees dens.
W. Lucia, on behalf of the meigsse, stated that this bad
not been done ors( to the absence of the solicitor in
Leaden.
Mr. Bagley urged that the benkrept right not to aul
by reason of the assigooe's default.
His Honour said that it was the duty of the assignee to
pay all mosey at once into the bank without its goiag bite
the beads of the solicitor, and he was liable to be sum-
moned aad mitred to isimisonmeat for neglecting to do
so. The case was one demanding further inquiry sad
there most be an adjournment.
(Before Mr. Commissioner Winslow.)
11 A. Z. CORNITS.—DUORSAWS DSCISION.
This was an application for release from custody. The
bankrupt, a emersion agent, of reathentone.buildias,
was derived et the suit of four creditors, one of whom de-
trued lure on a caper to hold te bail for 27/.
Mr. Maniere opposed on behalf of & creditor.
His Honour ear that the court had always had ems
ficulty in releasing from custody bankrupts who were held
to bail under &judge's order, it appearing somewhat in the
natured • review of the decision of a lodge of & superior
court, and some of the commissioner had eves doubted ,
whether the court had jurisdiction to niere.
The car of experts Waugh, however, established the
jurisdiction, but showed that the court should ewclae
rat with great caution ; and for some time it had been the
practice to leave bankrupts in such cues to apply to a
edge at chambers. A summons had been taken out before
. Jure Wiles to show cause why the bankrupt should
not be discharged out of custody, a reasonable time having
elapsed for the plaintiff to sign final judgment ; and
ups the summons wort on thatlearned judge endorsed the
following memorandum on the back of the summons :—" I
decline to interfere, being of opinion that the defendant is
is custody for debt; and I adjourn the summons until so-
plicatios may be made to she Court of Bankruptcy,
which court, in my opinion, has power to discharge
the defendant upon reareable terms, such as
meta bail, if the commissioner should think
it." His Honour was glad that such an opinion
bad been expressed. It might be necessary that beil should
be required, and it wee better that it should be given to
;IMAM the sittings of this court and reform to the bank-
ruptcy, than to give bail in the action. He should follow the
Mutation given by the learned judge, and order the bank-
rept to be released from all the detainers on his finding
tail, two sureties in 501. each, and himself in 1001., in the
noel form.

THE POLICE COURTS.
(THIS DAY.)

WORSHIP-STREET.
CONVICTION FO2 DOG argaxmta.
Charles Dalian, describing himself as • tailor, was
charged on remand with possessing seven valuable dogs,
supposed to have been stolen.
This cue was reported last week, and the descriptions of
the animals given in the police columns of the newspapers
beveled to the following identifications :
John Wolfe, of Charterbouse-square, attended, and
claimed the " white Maltese." The Rev. Henry Plimby
Bally, of (Ihrietchurch Parsonage, Hoxton, recognised the
English terrier as his property ; All Akir, representing
himself as secretary to the Persian Embassy, sad residing
in the Queen's-road, Bermondsey, gladly welcomed beck
his black retriever ; and Mr. George John Horsing, of 73,
Oxford-terrace, Edgware-road, Maimed the white Skye
terrier. All these dogs bad been stolen, and this was the
third time the retriever had twee restored—on the former
occasions in coesequeees of rewards offered.
Sergeant Butcher, of the C division, by whose activity
animals of the canine rsoe have been restored to
their lawful owners sad their unlawful possessors punished,
said that he had still three of the dogs on band—each of
them terriers, but he bad not the least doubt they would,
from the description made public, fall into the hands of
their legitimate owners.
Prisoner, who hod at the former examination claims
three of the seven dogs as Iris own property, tow cud he
would not have anything todo with them, he had purchased
bet one.
Mr. Cooke remarked that he had not the slightest doubt
the prisoner made it • business to steel dogs for the pur-
Pola of procuring the rewards offered for them. He should
Sue him 201., or in default of payment sentence him to 21
dove imprisonment in each of three oases where the
dogs were claimed, making in all 31. for unlawful posses-
sion, and with respect to the fourth CNN he ordered him to
De imprisoned for the term of six months' with hard
labour.