The Express.
London, England, 1867-07-06 00:00:00

.117/4"..iftip.

THE EXPRESS, SATURDAY EVENING, JULY 6, 1867.

could calculate who would be returned with an
~,rear..exersay as they could under the ofd rotten
etent. hie denied the :seem—tee of t:.e.
qateinelilr that 1,1.11:11cIty wvs dead. Bee the :A.; .-
tueraey was doomed, or that dumJeraey was
triumphant. Lord emnborne had been a minister,
art must then h-ts e become practically acquainted
with the fact that the monarch exercised a salutary
indttence over pehlie affairs. The aristocracy e eih.l
not he doomed while it produced such men as the
te4,i • I..rd..ind t:CIIIUCTIICy could not be said to be
t r, at t.t bill gave hum:timid su.lr.tge.
But there %cere only feur millions and a half of
huts-
hi:ed houses in Englantl, and less than a moiety of
I the oecepters of these would be qualified. In
the ts.roughe there were only 1,509,0110
houses. and ee.;sably household suffrage would
nut ear:• m:his*. inure than 300,0110, or at the
utmost 3,10.1 e on persons. But the bill of last year
would have enfranchised 200,0 al persons, and the
hills of former ears from 100,000 to 150,1Ke1, And
who was it they were going to enfranchise ! They
were Eng!ishmen elm had been born and had lived
under the law and manners and custoins of the
country. He ebjeeted to these bugbears being
made the foentlation for new legislation, which was
to change the character of the constituf of this
coma ry.

Sir 6. Or e,:pressed himself in favour of Mr.
Morrison'4 amendment, which was to give every
voter, not throe. but two cumulative votes.

Mr. Lou r. rep!ied ; and, on a division, the
clause wa• rejected by 314 to 173.
Further pro;,,,reas with the bill was then post-
poned. and, it being near seven o'clock, the sitting
was suspended. . _ .

At the evening sitting, on the order for going
into supply, several subjects were discusted, one
being the Irish peerage, respecting which an ad-
dress was moved by Sir C. O'LimutEx,pmying Fer
Majesty not to create more Irish peers, but Lord
NAAS opposing it, the motion was withdrawn.

Sir e..l:or.i:se it, called attention to the recent
persecution of the Jews of Roumania.
Lord STANLEY said the latest intelligence on the
subject was received this morning. Consul Green
informed them that Mr. Simpson, the consul at
Jassy, had communicated with the Prince Hoepo-
dar, and had received an assurance that the abuses
complained of would be put a stop to.
Another subject that was discussed was the
rank, pay, and position of the medical officers of
the army, which was brought forward by Mr.
SYSAN, who moved that it was desirable that the
recommendations of the committee in reference
thereto should be carried out ; but after some ob-
servations front Sir J. PatutioroN, who stated that
several of the recommendations of the committee
had been carried out, the motion was withdrawn.
Mr. TATtAnt called attention to the conviction of
two men for poaching by the Salisbury bench of
magistrates in March last, who were convicted, as
he alleged, on the false evidence of a gamekeeper,
of poaching, against evidence showing the inno-
cence of the prisoners. In the course of his speech
he said •

It appeared that en the With March last a game-
keeper named Pilgrim saw three men running away up •
hill from a coppice, and he swore that Henry Pulford and
Mark Welatead were two of them, but his testimony was the
only evidence apdast them. On the other hand, it was
sworn by the father of one that his son was sleeping in
the same room with him at the time, and the
father and mother of the other deposed that,
he was sleeping in the pile room with them.
The woman was a remark calhic ientious witness. She
deposed that she slept as that night, but she could
positively testify that the er was in bed at 9 o'clock
OL
at night and at 5 o'clock in the morning. Stephen Deer
swore that lie saw two men running away, and that the
two men taken up were not those he saw running away.
They had, therefore, the assertion of the gamekeeper on
the one side, and on the other three witnesses swearing in
direct contradiction. One would have supposed that if
the balance of evidence was not in :avour of the prisoner,
yet if there was a doubt the plainer would have had the
benefit of it. (Hem., hear.) But
Things bad begun make stroug themselves by W.
Things were indeed bad begun for those poor men when
country gentlemen t ntered that court and took their meats
on the bench against men who in point of fact were
offenders against them. Ard the thing that was bed
begun made strong itself by ill, becateas it predisposed
the magistrates to weigh in a false scale the evidence pro-
duced before them, and to viola.e the first principle of
English law, that n man was to be held innoceut till
he was found guilty. (Cheers.) Fulton' was con-
demned to six weeks' imprisonment because his pre-
vious character was absolutely irreproachable, and
Welstead was sentenced to three months' because he hail
been convicted before. The magistrates received as
gospel truth the evidence of Pilgrim's gamekeeper. The
refused even to cross-examine him, and although they did
not go so far as to chatae the woman by implication with
perjury, they intimated that she possibly might have been
mistaken, and that although she saw her son in the bed-
room at 9 and at 5, yet in the interval he ought have gone
out when she was asleep and done his little bit of poaching.
(A laugh.) If they bad taken the trouble to cross-
examine Pilgrim's gamekeeper, they would have found
that he deposed to seeing the men at • quarter to 5. Either,
then, the men were innocent and the gamekeeper had made
a mistake, or the father and mother had perjured them-
selves. But Pilgrim's gamekeeper was not altogether an
irreproachable witness, for on a previous occasion there
had been a conviction on his evidence, in which he bad
been proved to be wrong ; and singularly enough the clerk
of the magistrates; urged that in his favour, because he
said that having made arch a mistake once before, he
would he likely to be more careful on a future occasion.
(Laughter.) If that was the idea of justice these
persons entertained one could not hut be filled
with admiration at the entire harmony and
homogeneity which characterised all the sur-
rounding@ of this case, both with respect to the
magistrates and their clerk. As was the magistrate so was
the clerk, and as was the clerk so was the only witness.
Pilgrim's gamekeeper, indeed, said that he had another
witness, but when asked why he did not bring him for-
ward, ho said, "Oh, the magistrates would be satisfied
with his word ;" and so the clerk said to Mr. Payne. " If
you are dissatisfied with the conviction appeal to the
Home Secretary ; he will refer to the magistrates, and the
nimistssteswill report;" implying that their report would
end the whole matter, and the inference being that the
clerk would put the reply into his pocket, and they
would hear no more of it. But while the magis.
orates and the clerk affected to believe the men
guilty, all the neighbourhood knew they were innocent
—(oh, oh)—and they knew it for the reason that they were
perfectlyzernielust of who bad committed the offence.
(Cries of No, no.") Mr. Payne said that he did not wil-
lingly interfere in the mater, but it was only due to
justice and to his own sense of self-respect to state, that
for some time he had heard unpleasant rumours, but hav-
ing implicit confidence in the administration of justice, he
was at last forced to do as he had. In consequence of his
inquiries lie had been pat in communication with the real
culprits, and from the inquiries be made of them
he was thoroughly convinced that George and Mary Wel-
stead were thoroughly trustworthy witnesses, and more-
over the men in question had confessed that they were
the real offenders. These facts being brought to the at-
tention of the magistrates, one would naturally suppose
that they hastened to do the unfortunate imprisoned men
jastioe, and that the post would not be quick enough, and
their only anxiety would be whether or not they
would not resort to the telegraph. Mr. Payne
took the man who reads the confession before
Mr. Hinckman, the committing magistrate ; he coo-
, leased himself to be the real offender, and showed his
knowledge of the other. This offender was Stephen Deer,
who swore that the prisoners were not the men, but also
swore falsely that he did not know who the real offenders
I were. Mr. Payne naturally thought that the magistrates
I would have done the men justice, and have applied to the
Home-office to release them from prison, but to his cur-
prise, on the 2iith of May be received a letter from Mr.
Hinck man that ho had heard from Lord Folkea tore, and that
after a careful consideration of the evidence and other-
wise, they must decline taking any further steps
in the matter. The house would observe that those magi-
strates who sit on the bench to administer justice supple-
ment the evidence by the words " and otherwise." Did
that " otherwise," which apparently weighed so strongly
in the consideration they gave to this case, mean vague
rumour, or evidence that might have been called. Ile be-
lieved that it would be found to mean that a man named
Sherwood saw two persons running away, attempting to
disguise themselves, that he recognised one of them as Ful-
ford, hut could not recognise the other, and he it was who
told Pilgrim's gamekeeper that he thought he was not far
wrong. it turned oat afterwards that these MOD were
1 Stephen Deer and Charles Moody, and Moody being a re- 1
workably little man, when that description was given to
the gamekeeper he rushed at once to the conclusion that
it must be Welted, because he also was a little man.
Well, notwithetauding that all this evidence was procured
1 and forwarded to the Home Secretory, he declined
! to interfere in the matter, and perhaps he would
tell the house why he did so. (Hear, heir.) He
(Mr. Taylor) was inclined to think that either his
notion of evidence was as peculiar a, that of the magis-
trates, or 1:tot he had nut read it at all—(hear, Leer)—but
had left the matter to some clerk, who bad shelved it,
thus handing over the people of this country into the
hands of the county magistracy. (Hear, beer.) It WAS
somewhere before the 29th of May that Mr. Payne wrote
to the magistrates, and afterwards sent the information
to the Home Secretary, stating that this unhappy case
never stood upon more than one leg, and now that the
evidence of the gamekeeper had broken down it
had no leg left at all. The people of the
neighbourhood were quite of that opinion, for a petition

signed by 201). and headed by the ehurehwaniens. was pre-
1••••ated to the hint.r on the enhject. and be informed the
I tome Secretsry that in point of [Jet the case ltd broken
down shamefully. Nine days ..!ter that orders served
that Wi! dad w • a to be released. N...v tb:a mitt Weased
because be was not guilty, and Hr. Payne thought that
at least the ju dice would be done of releasing his
bail from responsibility, end accordingly on the 18th
of Julie lie wrote to tae Home ri•;:creteity stating
that it was hard enough upon the nor man
to have 'offered an unjust imprisoument, but it would
be still harder on him if his bail were not released ; but I
it was almost incredible that no answer whatever had •
been received to that application. They sometimes heard j
it charged against reformers that they set class against
clan ; but was there ever a case more likely to art the pea-
santry against the squirearchy ? Let hen. member* try to
bridge over the abyss that separated them front that class
--put themselvea to their position, and imagine what
would be their feelings if subjected to such injustice.
(Hear, hear.) He was not quite sure whether, under such
laws as our game laws, they would not find themselves ani-
mated by the spirit of wild justice which revenge had by a
high authority been defined to be. What moat be the
seeding of hope'ess insecurity among the people of this
neighbourhood, nit one of whom was aura that they
might not be made the victim of some serviceable resod
anxious to procure a conviction which he koaw
would be pleasant to his master, and whose
oath would be held to weigh more than any
number of witnesses that they could bring— (cheers)—
especially when the charge was knocking over a hare which
happened to be nibbling his cabbages, crossing the road, or
nibbling on his master's pasture. It was not always the
cue that a person charged was able to bring irrefraga-
. ble proof of his innocence, and it was well
Iknown that there were hundreds of such cases
in England in the course of a year. (No, no.)
He said that it was a moat dangerous thing to sane-
! tion the commission of such reckless injustice, and were it
I not that the peasantry of England were good-natured and
mild to an extmonlinery degree, they would with one
voice demand that it should he placed out of the power of
the ma),istracy to inflict such gross injustice on their
Icountrymen. (Cheers.)

The following discussion then ensued :
Mr. MARSH denied that there were hundreds of these
cases occurring every year. Of the two magistrates who
had tried this case one was no game preserver, the other
was Lord Folkestone, KM= who was entirely above sus-
picion. He believed that the verdict of these magistrates
was • correct oae. (Ironical Shears.) One of the w;-
news had made two contradictory statements before the
magistrates, • fact which was not quite consistent with
the theory of his veracity.
Mr. HARDY said that the hon. member for Leicester
had adopted • course which he (Mr. Hardy) hoped would
never be repeated in that house. No doubt the hon. mem-
ber believed that all honour and public virtue would die
with him. The hon. member had spoken of gentlemen
doing their duty on the bench as men capable of convict-
ing two persons against whom there was no evidence,
or upon evidence which they knew to be
false, merely because that eviderce was gives
bt • gamekeeper. The honounible member
should know that mistakes occurred in administering every
law as well as the game laws. He (Mr. Hardy) disdained
what the hon. member had said of himself. He believed
that the magistrates were perfectly disinterested, and that
they decided after careful investigation, but he thought
there were SOM. doubts about the case, and that therefore
it was his duty to release the men. What had taken place
Three men were out poaching—the hon. member himself
admitted that -- they were sworn to by the
witness Pilgrim, and one of them remained six
weeks in prison simply because no application
was made to the Home-office. It appeared, therefore,
that that man (Henry Fulford) submitted to his fate
without remonstrance, and it should be remembered also
that they might have appealed to quarter sessions. (Hear.)
Krowing the difficulties of a case when men were cot
' brought face to face, he had ordered the release of the
men, and also that their bail should Le got rid of. If
that not been done, it was not the fault of the Home-
office. This case had in the first instance been taken up
by the hon. and learned member for Richmond—why was
it now entrua ed to the hon. member for Leicester!
(Ironical cheers.) The hon. and learned member for Rich-
mond hail spoken of the magistrates in the enlogietic
terms which had been applied to those gentlemen by the
hon. member for Salisbury. Ile (Mr. Hardy) did not
mean to say that a mistake had not been committed, bet
mistakes were committed in other cases as well as thou
of infractions of the game laws. He remembered a case
in which some men were convicted on the evidence of one
nisin,although four of them hail attempted to prove an alibi.
On the investigation it was found that the man hail bees
right in every cue, and the ju y, seeing the men face to
face, believed the one man in preference to the twenty or
twenty-five who came to prove the different alibis. If the
house were to regard evidence as the hon. member for
Leicester seemed inclined to do, according to the num-
ber of the witnesses, and not to the weight of
their testimony, they would be likely to arrive at
most unjust decisions. (Hear, hear.) The hon. mem-
ber had said that one of the magistrates bad spoken of the
"evidence and otherwise." The whole of the evidence the
hon. member had brought forward was taken from the
father and mother of one of the defendants, and the
" otherwise" evidence was not that given on oath before
the magistrates, but that which was subsequently scat to
the Home-office. He (Mr. Hardy) believed the decision
was honestly and fairly given, because the magistrates be-
lieved the evidence before them ; nor was it the duty of
the magistrates to enter into such a cross-examination as the
bun. memberfor Leicester supposed. The hon. member's idea
of cross-examination was en extraordinary one. lie had
said the witness Pilgrim was not cross-examined as to
what Stephen Deer had said about seeing some man
running away • mile off. It would have been • most
extraordinary thing to have salted Pilgrim about what
Stephen Deer hail seen a mile off.
Mr. TAYLOR said what he had stated was that Pilgrim
ought to have been cross-examined as to when and where
he saw the three men running away.
Mr. HARDY said the mother had sworn that her son
was in bed about a o'clock, and the keeper had said he saw
the man between 4 and 5 o'clock between one and two
miles from the cottage in which he lived. The magistrates
knowing bow indefinite evidence as to time frequently
was, believed from the evidence before them that there
was time for the man to have got from where the game-
keeper saw him to the house where he lived,
at the hour stated, without imputing perjury to the
father or mother. That there was poaching waa clear, and
that certain persons ran away was clear, and he must say
that nothing could have convinced him more than the
manner in which this case had been brought before the
house of the impropriety of bringing up such matters on
en appeal where the witnesses could not be seen, and
where the evidence they had given could not be tested.
After the tone and spirit of the speech that had
been made by the hon. member for Leicester, he must say
that lie never heard any one attempt to enter upon • ju-
dicial investigation in so unjudicial a noon ee. (Hear.)
The hon. gentleman had treated the magistra'eri in this
case worse than the magistrates would have treated any
witness who had been known to have perjuied himself on
a former occasion, and had supposed that because the case
was one of poaching the magistrates had dealt with it in
a different manner to that in which they would
have treated any other case. He might just
as well have said that in any ordinary case
of robbery magistrates had so deep an inte-
rest in protecting their neighbours' property that they
would believe any charge that was brought before them.
One of the magistrates, it appeared, was not a game pre-
server, and he ought at least to be regarded as a disinte-
rested person. However, it was not for him (Mr. Hardy)
to defend the magistrates. He firmly believed that they
acted on their sense of what was right, believing the evi-
dence brought before them. (Cheers.)
Mr. MILL had never heard a more unjustifiable attack
upon a member than that just made upou his hon. friend
the member for Leicester toy so high a functionary as the
Home Secretary. (Cries of "Oh, oh" from the ministe-
rial side of the house.) The right hon. gentleman had not
denied • single statement of the hon. member. (Hear,
hear.) The right hon. gentleman said the magistrates be-
lieved the evidence given before them to. be true ;
but the tendency of magistrates was always to
believe the evidence of gamekeepers. (Oh, oh.)
Whether that was so or not, it was the general opinion,
and this was an extraordinary and emphatic corroboration
of that opinion. It seemed that Pilgrim, on whose evi-
deuce these persons were convicted, bad before made an
unfortunate mistake as to identity; and after the self -crinii- '
nation of the persons who had been mentioned, a duty was
imposed upon the magistrates to sift the case to the very
bottom. It was said that the men might have appealed
to the quarter sessions, but were the unfortunate
labouring classes in the rural districts likely to
appeal from magistrates to magistrates! (Hear, hear.)
Were they not infinitely too much afraid and tooi much
cowed ? (" Oh, oh.") The only reason given against the
motion was that these magistrates were very honourable
men ; but one of them was likely, in consequence of his
judicial mind, to be appointed chairman of quarter session.,
in which cap flea', he would have the most important
judicial functions to discharge. They might he honourable
men ; but honourable men were sometimes singularly pre-
bediced, singularly unjudicial, and singularly disposed to
blieve in the sufficiency of evidence in a particular kind
of charges. Illear, hear.)
Mr. NEATE thought that the hon. member for Leicester
in bringing forward whet he believed to be a gross case of
magisterial 'misdeeds, had been rebuked by the Home
Secretary in a tone which ought not properly to have been
adopted. iHear, hear.)
Sir M. BEACH bore testimony to the character and
position of the two magistrates, and observed that the
style in which the hon. member for Leicester brought for-
ward the question reflected greater discredit upon himself
than upon those gentlemen. (Hear, hear.)
1 Mr. W. E. FottsTEß said that as there appeared to be
noder.ositionsand no record of the grounds upon which the
men were convicted, he should ask as an addition to the
motion, that the correspondence which had taken place
between the magistrates and the Horne.office should be
produced. The risht hon. gentleman had no right to re-
ease the men and forgive them their bail, unless justice
had miscarried, and if it had, the case was a proper one to
bring before the house. (Hear, bear.)

Mr. A. SEYMOUR having at for many years as a Wilts
magistrate expressed his surprise that no depositions or
notes were taken in this ease. If none had been token
by the clerk to the masistrates, all be could say was that

the practice ene; most reprehenrible. He was eeginainted
with huth the inagietrit,,, and he belie% ed they were men
of high honour. who wonbi not convict any wan unleas
they were natialiNl of his

Mr. HARDY obeerve.l that olthonli there were no
depositions, tits ordinary notes in swill miss were taken
yAb• amitiatrates. _ _ _

HINiiAIRD skid that these men had huffered
puuishment at the hands of the magistrate+ who were
evidently interested parties. (Oh, oh.) There could be
no doubt the gentry and magistrates in this county were
game preservers, but they held in Scotland that it was
inexpedient that game preservers should adjudicate in
CRAM of this kind, and that they should be dealt with by
the sheriffs.
Mr. HENLEY did not think that the hon. member rer
Leicester had introduced the Aubject in a moderate way,
for although he said there were a hundred instances
of the same kind, he did not venture to adduce any
evidence in proof of that assertion. He thought
he never heard a case which showed more than this
how unfit the House of Commons was to consider.
Thu hon. member fur We,tmin■ter had gone about the
city at meetings, and had denounced the conduct of the
magistrates, and now he came to sit in judgment upon it.
Why did not the men appeal? If they had done so the
case would have been fully heard in the presence of an
intelligent bar, and justice would have been dens to the
men. He quite agreed with what the Home Secretary
bad said upon the subject.
Lord ELCHO thought the tone taken by the lion. mem.
ber for Leicester was open to censure, and the cheers
which followed the remarks of the Home Secretary showed
that.

Mr. CHILDERS, having listened to the debate, was
surprised at the amount of heat crewed. The ease was
a plain and simple one. These two men had been con-
victed of this offence upon very insufficient eviderce, at
least upon very slender evidence, and the hon. member
fo- Leicester had done his duty in bringing it before the
house. The house ought not to refuse the production of
the papersandcorrespondence, which were public property,
and he would suggest an alteration of the motion to that
eject.

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER thought it
might appear from the tone of the debate that the Home
Secretary bad imprisoned some of her Majesty's subjects;
but he had recommended the exercise of the prerogative
of mercy. That that should be complained of was most
surprising. Documents had been moved for which did not
exist ; and as to the correspondence, why the Home
Secretary was constantly corresponding with magistrates,
and it was utterly impossible to assent to the production
of it.

--
Ultimately a division was taken on the motion
that the depositions be laid on the table, which was
negatived by 70 to 31.
The house then adjourned at twenty minutes to
two o'clock.

FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZETTE

[vain 01 II M`ClTOlti AND FORTUNE PARTICULARS TO II

OBTAINED AI MI 0E1•1011 O► THE CE!EF REGISTRAR,
own OF “ANILIiUMT, BAIINLHALL-STRERT.I

BANKRUPTS.
BARNS CORI:I, Myddettooatreet, tfierksswell, clothier, to sur.
render July 10, at It
JAIIIO6 11A ti.4la, Martins-lane, City. tea dealer, July 17, at 1.
NMI/SHAY CESSUrt WntuO7, Bloomsbury-situate, solicitor,
July 17, at 1.
Gratin bttiYtßl, Wenlock.street, New Noethroad, outfitter,
July 17, at 1
Braes (305.1 DAWSWII, Nobleat Chearside, dyer, July 17, at
isuatarlllat•sr, Shackles ull-lune, late auctioneer's clerk, Jui..

_
17. at 2.
Irtiddae &manneroi, Leighton [tumid, Bedfordshire, printer,
July 17, at 2.
CII•ILKs MAW, Ratheld.cottsges, Grant-road, liattersea, late
pig dealer. July 2.:, at 11.
WlLLiaal liow Lie [Manta, Winchester-street, Pimlico, late
secretary to a club, July 23. at IT.
ISAAC Kos PALL, Barrow-on-the.lllll, hairdremer. July 23, at 12.
DAN lit PRINOLIK Gutter-lane, City. merchant, July 23, at I.
GUMMI TURNBULL, Grenville-street, Brunswick-square, com-
mercial clerk, July 23, at I.
THOMAS Jung Gravesend. late coal merchant, July fl. at 2.
THoilAs SLATMAKEL Wyndham-street. Bryainstone-square, clerk
to a livery stable keeper. July 22, at 12.
/INNIS THOMAS BRASFIELD, Now.street, florslcydown, printer,
July 18, at Z.
THOMAS LRIRWOOD. Charles-street, Portland Town, sign painter,
July 18, at 2.
SAMUEL ?AMAIN, Trinity-terrace, Southwark, warehouseman's
assistant, July 21. at 11.
SAMUEL 11,11101, South-row, (golden-square, trimming seller,
July 22, at ii.
ROMSKT SAN OERs. T•mbriol2r, gent. Kr, a:cr. July 22. at 11.
TiloMAs (11101101. Compton mews, Compton-44feet, Brunswick.
square. smith, July 22, at 12.
JAMB LKIVIS, Sen., Deptford, firewood dealer, July ti. at 12.
JAMES MILIMSNALL, Wimbledon, labourer, July 22, at i 2.
JOHN REEIL Roche-4er, barge owner. July 22, at 12
DANIEL bIEkUIVIKLI. IlutighLou-strett, CLare-market,
advertising writer. July!!, at 1.
°Wein SUTTON Tatstamt, If unworthy, Dometahlre. clerk In
holy oilers, July 22, at 1.
Saltliat IloitTON PITo 0411. , flirt., EDWAND LADD BETTS. and
THOMAS RUSSELL CRAMPWISL Great George-street, Weatmln-
slur, contractors for public worts, Jul:yet:at It.
WILLIAM PooKK, rhippentiamoarram, Harrow-toad, auto-con-
tractor on public works, July 22. at I.
ens SIAN PA•PLIN, Yorkat., liacknay.rd . mariner, July TS, at 2.
MAL NICE HUN rs H.Croydoil,manager to • Ohre faclury,.l my lust I.
THEONORI LUDWIG lEMIL LANOISZIN, @e-en's Head-yard, High-
street, Southwark, hop factor, July 18, at It.
BESET Harm or.r.s. Jun., Kidderminster, attorney, July 17. at 12.
Lima Roret,, Wedneseeld-heath, Staffordshire, coalmastcr.
July 17, 1412.
Josttre ILMILtato; and 0501 ma BLOUNT, Oldbury, Worcester-
oldie. manufacturing chemists, July 17, at It
Jowl WARD, Leicester, C 0111111115.100 agent, July U at 11.
Ursa? Rat,, Median, Cornwall. carrier, July 16, at 11.
JOHN PooLar, Msrake, Yorkshire, surgeon, July 15. at 11.
WILLIAM ATNINtou and EPHRAIM ATKINSON, Dewsbury, York-
shire, builders. July It, at I l
JOHN AMIToN, Kingston-upon-Hull, fish merchant, July 24, at 12.
11001LMAN Mtwara,. •trrocer. July 17, at 12.
BRUM NIMITINIML/t, Penworthani, Lancashire, yarn agent,
July 15, at 11.
AIMIRD Coma, Manchester, Ponfounder, July 16, at 11.
*UNTIL YCZNITAL, Manchester machinist, July 24, at 11.
CHARM S SHILTOM BUTCRICI, Manchester, public accountant,
July 17, at 11.
THOMAS ATRIUMS, Barrow-la-Furness, Lancashire, clockmaker,
July 22, at 1!.
Lacing MI'LinoNT MILLAR, Rochdale. draper, July 23, at 12.
Joni JOHNNTIM, yl4llll, draper, July 29, at 12.

HOUR? HooPPR DoWRING, Ipswie , paper, nger, July 16, at IL
TlioNaitllabLzr.Pattinghans,Straffonish .frultdealer.Julyl6,l4l2.
Diraf TRUMAN J ANIS, Carmarthensh ire, general agent,
July Ifi, at 10.
THOMAS TIALL, Cirencester, bootmaker, Julyl7, at 12.
JAMBS BUM, Walsall, Staffordshire, plater, July IT. at 12.
JOHN Bache, Exineer, domersetahlre. fanner, July 10, at 10.
ENNISSON BoCenntorff, Northwood, Staffordshire, builder, July
20, at 11.
THOMAS BRITAIN. Kahn, fairreashire, heereeller, July 20, at 91.
JOSITH kiNuN, Halifax, greengrocer, July 19, at 10.
Jolly Bnurfl, Liverpool. butcher, July 16, at 3.
Joins FRANCR. Louth, Lincolnshire, slater. July 15, at 11.
HoSINT HiLoagn.Greas 1-rlton, Lincolush., farmer.Julyl6sit
MATTHIIN OoIITEIUI HARDT, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, agent fur
timber merchants, July 20, at It.
?dear ANS ADAMS, Newcastle•upon.Tyne, beerhouse keeper,
July VI, at 10.
EDWIN PITTI7T, Bath, clerk In holy orders, July Id, at 2.
VINIT, Bath, dyer, July 18, at 3.
H BUROR PUNA!, Burford, Osfordah., carpenter, July IR, at I.
WaLlas ARV NoLlei, St. Clears, Carinarthenshire, victualler,
July 15, at it.
Vinare! HILISFOID, lielkshalo, Wiltshire, timber dealer,
July 15, at S.
ALLAINION Scam, 11113., Kelghlcy, warehouseman. July 17, at 1.
61.11A111/1 LCNNINII and FINNAN LUNN'S% Brighton, Juvenile
dress makers, July 20, at 11.
James 8161011% Newmarket. butcher, July 16, at 11.
HRNRT HOPCROIT, Chinnor, Oxfordsb., tailor, July IS, at 11.
MAROS DIXON, Kingston.upon-llull, cordwainer. July 16, at 11.
WscLIAN HALCROW, Kingston upon dull, beerhouse keeper,
July 16, at 2.
JAHNS HAMM Mows, Upchurch, Kent, Journeyman wheel-
wright. July 20. at 10.
Saws WiLsins, Balkinirton, Wilts, shoemaker, July 15, at 11.