The Express.
London, England, 1859-11-07 00:00:00

THE MORTARA CASE.

DEPUTATION TO LORD JOHN HUBBELL.
(THIS DAY.)

This afternoon • deputation waited, by hp-
Toiattomet, ape L,tcl John Hama, her lajewys foreign
sareetery, at the to lay bd., hal loth-
alp 6 p 6 .666 Lou est the protest ptheeolieffs of the
Papal outharvias tit the Mutters cm*, sad to repent
that hat Mar...l*ll trovertatest, i. ease they should take
say part is lLe Wiliam' of the hakes quanta., wlll
thew the July, t of the l'opol treathseat of tha Jews to be
. .

b to Mire the enetiderad 'is of the govenonents of
Tb• drpetanos emesiated of Sir Culling Eradley,
Yre-chairmes. S. Osman, Esq., M.P., Iffejor-Oesend
Alestuider, me Mayor of Rochester. Mr. J. Lord, Bristol*
Scott, he. sereetary, W. Lerch, Req., ftew. John. Garrett,
It.. S. Be dge, Kew. 11. Schtsettais, Rev. G. R. Birch,
T. t tinter, Hy., 0. Yoege, Rai., Dr. Didoe, R. R. A 1...
ander. Eel., It. N. Yowler, Eel. Several I:Lubin:nen and
feintlemen who were unable to lie present sent their cards, in-
toiatieg their toomervenee and regretting their Mobility to
attend.
1 be deputation was intredured ty Mr. Scorr, the City
Chamberlain, who eaplained that the Lorl Mayor end Sir
Jame* Doke were unavoidably abeam, the former from ill
health.
Mr. Stott said be had been requested by the committee
to wan that reporter@ of the London piper., were present,
and that they would not allow theta to be present without
hie lordship being made swam of it.
Lord J. Ruseett-1 have no objection at all to their
presence the guesser bang a pablic 01111.
Sir CULLING EAIIDLIT acid—My lord, I. the absence 01'
the Lord Mayor of Ledo°, the Chairman of the Morten
Committee, I hare the bower, e. Ylete-cheirroan, to pat into
your heads • copy of the Mortara protest. I need not, per-
hap; trouble your lordatilp by reeding it. It has been in'
all the pipers, sad is signed by 79 mayors and
provosta, 17 delve and other pairs, 22 bishops
and erctibishop., members of parliament, sad • van
number of clergy nod laity of all denomination.. The
committee by whom the roust hat bees conducted bps Wet
your lordship will be kind esouth to bring the document
under the notice of her Mtjaity't government. They she beg
to exerts. • hope that in the event of her Majesty taking
a pan in the esaismast of the Italian question at • commies
or othervrian We Majesty will come the Papal treatment
of the Jews, la the Mortars case, and in others also, to be
brought bekos the masideration of the governments of Smog,.
Illy iced, I seed pot, sepseially with such • friend of freedom
no roar lerdthdp, dwell upon the infamy of the
teenseedes. image rings with It. If anything were oast-
*to port that the Papal government is what your lord-
ship and Lord Palmerston ham always said that It is,
It is the Mortara ewe What then le to be done?
The Mortara Committee nab that the Papal
treatment ef the Jews may be begged by Rag-
land helm the geveraments of Europe. With what view?
If your lordship will allow me I will state my opinion.
With • view to such • settlement of Italy no will involve
• liberstioa of Mcmars. If that child is ones liberated
the crime will sever be repeated. Now, my lard, the must
M It we bee told all men that Mortara being • nadir,
et Bologna sad Bologna belonging to the Pope, the
berms the. Pope's subject, shall not be restored to lie parents;
on the ether hood, If Bologna, which is already free from the
Pope it facto by the decision of Europe becomes free etr
run the child Mortars will be liberated by the law
of nations. It will become the subject of a forsiga
state. Now, my lord, the c/a:stelae, of Europe and
of meek iod demand/ that this child shall he liberated;
and se by the showing of Rome itaelf, this cannot be
effected in one way, and ea it certainly ma be @flamed in
another way, I oak that that other way may be
adopted. I ark the Foreign Minister of England to bold
• brief for the Jaws. I ask that England may demand
of the °garrets of nations the freedom of Bologna, with
a view to the freedom of Mortara. I oak that Eaelend,iteylitS
gives to the Jews of Ragland perfect political rtancipetion,
Orrin gives to the Roman catholic. of England per-
fect palitisel measeipation, having never failed to raise
lwr yoke in behalf of religious freedom, quite as
mach of Jews sag et esthetics as of protestant*,
all the world tar, may saw disc/ et the Ulna catholic
nod other stare of Ester snob • settlement of the quote=
of Central Italy es will make this child free. I ark that free.
dos may be glees to the down-trodden ant opi raised race of
Israel in the Goly owtotry le Europe which would dare to
perpetrate the iniquity of which we complain to-day.
The has. baronet coneloded by handing in the protest,
a copy of which hoe already appeared in the Express.
Led Joni( Hui,' acid—[ believe I have correctly
understood what you (add...ins Sir C. Eardley) and the
deputation Malted to repreeent to me. With regard to the Cu.
itself, it is, se you have very properly observed, unneneweary
to use arguers with any person striding In the eituation
that I do—that of British Minister foe Foreign
Affairs. We should of coarse consider it • greet vie-
brim of palatal right' for any perms to take
away a child from its parent', and for the
state to protect that violation. Nor do I see that the ere
has been made at all bettor by an allegation which I have ems,
that in fact the permits of this chili hod violated
the law of the country by taking • Christian nursery maid
into their service. I am sure that If to tide country anytime
was to proper that Roma catholic. should not be at liberty
to Wm • protestant nursery maid into their service,
every Raman catholic would or, out against it as •
pose violation of religious liberty, and would main-
tain that such • law would be only ea aggra-
vation of the offence of taking the child from
its I penal.. So that upon the jungles of the owe there
seed be so argument, and there ma be se question.
But with regard to what the British government should de
In the molter, you stied that I aliened esmitheekate your
wishes to my colleagues, and I wade he seseeint my-
self by styles that I will °ornately dot they, and will
femoral to them what this respecteble depstatise has mild
M regard to the subject. Of c iota' whim the eases to deal
with brags settees with repeal be their pertieslar laws
and Wear. the owl*, le saver easeingeseed
with ditlieuttint. In the err plece ewe ought to
bare • very strong Ca. of violates, sot merely
ear notices of Nedra, whether political or Mien's, bet of
the cameos reatimista of jostles that all iseepesa
ashore estertals, in lb. caw which is Mem& he-
lices no. In the neat place, It Is to be esmidend
what are the pendia/ lows of tine different asthma bane
whom the gumbos might acme. The laws of Rases are
not seek as we ma at all approve. la Near
these is complete liberty far the Jews, sad
lees teen sow Le a considerable time; bat with
regard to other amities of &rope, it is I. feet ha-
preible to ray what view they nay tab ea bearing upon
their owe legislation with respect to the Jews. Therefore
I tan only say that the matter meat be a good dial
unarmed before the same of the British mattes is pm
Reward by the organ of this imam, in making repetitious-
ness to pricers MIMI. At the same time the car is, I
gaits admit, cos la which all our feelings of what is
doe to parents are violated, and that must I thine be very
geaernlly Wt. It is no doubt part of the legislation ef
Rams, with its view of the nommity of belonging 10 the
Rms. catholic church, upon which I do set wish to
eater, sad which would, of moor, make that church
sat the Roman nut/miter entirely oppowd to any reproves.
tattoos toot might be made, and therefore I conaider that it
would be of in. um whatever to go to the Papal &Mao-
Mae sad oaks repreeentatieas to shim on this subject. I
hoe.% however, lietenei attentively to what hat been said,
sad I will take care t het my colleague, shall be informed of
what has peened at this interview.
Sr C Es touter wished to nate that the Jewish comma-
idly through its organ the Jeer .4 Chronicle express d • few
days agi its warm interest In the object of the deputation.
Re also wilted to say that Lord Stratford de Radcliffe bad
written in the fulloeier terms —" You will greatly
oblige me by expreiwieg my regret to the com-
mittee at my abseriii, soil also my hearty good
wishes that the Secretary of Susie roe, feel himself at liberty
to • imp'', with the requiet merle." S r Culling added that
Sir Stove Monii tiore had expressed hie willingness to
go again to Rome as • member of a deputation;
while the Pe.voet of Edinburgh wee willing to go on
• similar Weston to Paris. He further stated that the
Aretibisbop of Canterbury had signed the protest, but the
Bishop of Louden had not, the right rev. matte remarking
that the Mortara care was but part and panel of
the 'mein of Rome, and that if be UN, to
prone against .very uojustifieble set of the Papacy be
wouid have witting elm to do but to be continually
protestisp. The den uteti would her been far twifentiMerotla
0.1 is taken place at the time ormiselly *peo:nod, and he
(Sr. C. Earley) wee awry that his biedship wee tutoring
from indispeoloos.
Lad lows Ruseett, who appeared to be suffering folio
/ever* hoarnesem, said he moat geologies f a not having bees
able ti meet the depetetion list week. At brat he
hod only a slight add ; but it elterwarde became so severe
that be wee robed to postpone the iaternew.
The deputation this withdrew.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

(THIS DAY.)

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
Sittings is Bsaeo.—(Belor• the Left! Chief Judas Kris sad
Isaias William, Cfew.:er, ead Bytes.)
se woe V. JOHNSON AND OTHZII.-LANDLOILD •ND

TIN•NT.
This wee an action to teeover damages for what was
said to be =Mania dietrese, and at the trial before Mr.
Jamie. Wilke, at Staff nl, the verdict wee for thedefendanta.
Mr. Scotlasd now applied for a rule for • new trial upon
the gram& that the verdict was =ail= the evidence, and
that the Julie had improperly directed the jury. The plain-
tiff in 1166 ;wirehaired • email property, his attorney, Mr.
Palmer, edveneing him part of the money, and taking a
mortgage to secure it. In 1564 Mr. Palmer claimed repay-
ment of the mortgage money, and, in default. sold the po-
verty to the defendant, Johnson, who demanded pomeesioe.
The plaintiff refused to give up possession, contending
that the sale wee illegal, and he threatened to resist any
attempt to deprive hint of poine=ion. The defendent's
came wee that after the purchase Mra. Eetl, the plaintiff's
mother-In-low, who lived with the plaintiff on the premises,
agreed to become the tenant, but sue getting in erre= foe
net, two 'operate dietretwee were levied, and on those owe-
mons the plaintie's goods were diatramed. Tune distrait=
the plaintiff contended were Illegal, and claimed damage• for
them. The learned judge left it to the jury to say whether
there had bees an agreement for a tenancy between Johnson
=1 Mrs. Earl, but it was now submitted that there was no
evidence at all that the tenancy of the plaintiff had termi-
nated. ad that in default of any such evidence it moat be
mem= that the plaintiff continued in possession as tenant
on sufferance.

Toe court, however, was of opinion that the ttIOOSO7 Or
Dawson terminated immediately the mortgagee demanded Ma
mosey without getting a, and that without any pales or
legal proem whatever.
Hole refueled.

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.
(Before lb. Jodi* Ordinary.)
OASC O. O•IIC—CROSLTT DT A WWI.
The petitioner, Mr. Ferdinand Fugas Auguste Oiem, •
teacher of French, and reader on one of the moniker
*Mao, *ought • judicial separation on the ground
of cruePy and demotion. The parties were mar-
ried on the 23rd of September, 1854 ; end on the
28th of the following month a dispute arose &Owen'
them, which ended in the respondent's threateoing to break
rho potirioner's bead with the poker, and in bee eotoilly
&crotch* Ws face. On the 31st she left her itn•bsied's
lodgings, No. I, lateen-square, Bloomsbury, end sever steer
monied to cohabitation.
Dr. Wan3by was counsel for the husband; the wile did
not appear.
Sir C. Cromwell did not thick say cam of °reeky had been
made out, but be would grant • separation, on the ground of
direction for two pees and upwards without resecombie
cause. Mersey husband who hut hie facie scratched by his
wile were to sae for • divorces the court would hare enough
to do. (A laugh.):

AMa AND PLAICE e. LIMA.
Thie was a suit to tht..romte the valeley of the will of
Mr. William Limb., late of Cerne Abbas, Dureetaliini, dairy-
's's, who died on the 6th of February kat, leaving
property worth about 1,1001. By the will in qrs.
taxa, which wee executed on the 16th of January,
be lierpesathed his household furniture to his wife, whom to
bed recently married. He also gave her a life interest in
SOW , which he directed after her death to be divided amongst
the lease M his marriage, if any ; and if not he left it with
the rimidne to verieue menibers at hie own family. Three
makes/Mr executing his will he committed suicide. The
inetnnuest was propounded by the executor., and was
by the widow on the ground of Insanity."o7d
Lu.h, Q.C., sad Dr. Waraby appeared for the
*half Dr. Dear, Q C., br the defendant.
The attesting witnesses having been examined, and having
ex ecut ed
deposed to the perfect sanity of the deceased at the time he
the iseerament,
The Court deemed probate, end refused the widow her
aims out of the estate.