The Express.
London, England, 1859-08-22 00:00:00

LISIZAID IIiCTJO2I.

The election of a representative for the borough of
Llskeerd, is the room of Mr. &W. Orgy, ambled Cstemmio-
'loner of Customs, eras held os 7.lday. r. Ralph Bernal
Osborn* wee die only eyelids* Is the field. Pronoun to the
eteetl.o • large number of the eleetor• of Bodnun entered 'he
town di compeay with Mr. Wyld, the newly-elected member
for that borough. Every test wore a wreath 4 laurel leaves
on lee breast. Me. T. J. Agar Roberts,, M.P. for East
Cog nrell, wee also prewar, sad the esti* assembles* num-
bered about two thoesand pryer.
The Mayor of Lekeard presided r veturaleg officer.
Mr. Burette proposed, and Mr. ANDILIW BINOSTOX
secooded, the emoiartion of the Eight Hsu. Rallis Basel
Wynne u a fit sad proper imam to reprvernt the borough
of
bees Wined * peritonea% ; sod no other canlldate having
Tlieljert saainaciii Mr. Osborne to have tern duly
elected._ . . .

TM Hor. Gartri.zinue retannd thanks la a eFe=ch of
some labia.
81, Anbur Baer, the newly elected member for Devon-
=.3lr. Moberise, M.P.. and Mr. WOO, M.P., also ad-
the sleets,,, expermine their r mearrence m the poll-
neat eanduseade at Mr. o.batte, and r mgratulating the
tlectors as their baring ea worthy a reprwentanta.

THE DEER FORISTB.—In the forest of Fannieb,
the petty began the name of dr, r-etalkAg on the 15th.
Captain Wywthem killed a rig with • heed et eight tunes,
and wounded mod bet another with ten rises. A. Webb,
. at one stalk, shot a royal min, another with CA to thee,
and a third with eight. The deer were t und all very for•
ward and in giod condition. In Cromer...roc forest Lord
Doors is getting excellent sprat having killoi ten good stags
to his own rifle up to the 15th met. On that day his
Lra-
eblp shot two floe stage, right and lefr, and nude right and
bit shore brit* during the previous week. (he of the stage
killed on the 15th weighed 18 stone clean, another shut on
tt e 12th neighed 17 eke 10 lb. elean—the etual'ea of the
I tee .toga weighed li Maw, and the whole were in good ..dc-
dilog, the largrit remarkable far. In °lemma-darer
ek.en rine were shot last week—eve fell W Lira Loyal'.
ries, eve to the Mahar if LOWS,, end one Ina *hoe by Mr.
Hoge Scott. At Onisnekes, D. C.Marjoribabke, Lai., soot
a gee stag. 16f atone oleos, wait • well feriae.* head al eat-
lers.— Scoteesers.

YOND.-10 censequence aad the prosecution hawing a:premed a desire That tha
dtheapproaohhig departure of the Right Hoe. James W. court would he lenient towards him, be was liberated on
gm for ladle be km boss complied to decline the messier- entering into Lis own recognisances m lOW. to come op for
ship of the Newapsir r Preee Lund, of which It• still coati- judgment whoa called upon.
atm ; a vice-president. The right h•a. gendaraan has StCOND COOKS COD ItT.—(Befoas Mr. Ellis, Q.C.)
fawned a hope that 01 hot return to Enai•tol, Bee years The following cases were disposed vf in the Chancery
betassAin my dad the fund • • brieiugg amnia u. DAM Coto,
CM Mare" laq., harrieter.at- I or, bas Itietn elected ties- Jouph Leather, committed of a burglary committed in
yam ad the faaL , &clams, on tlie Plat Jaly WC at the home of Samuel
THE EDCCATIONAL QOUTION.--It is stela Oanset, woo sentenced to sit psi,' pewit ',gigs.
thell in seeseessees of the Mamma oldie Romish metaled Niffiale !Aeries, charged with the mashinghter of his
men Ike edacadca queet.os, Mr. Jame OTerrall hoe wen- wife, at Li I, on the 9th May last, ma fused gaily,
died Ids redgmtion ci.olakelower. It I. added ea end esasaad to oix week: iniprieonmint with herd leboar.
piebalds that in • few daje other Roman Catholic commie- Agars.m Algiwsad Nary lrecw. „„, osevtatrd dpess•
doom will tog. the aria. Bras,. An error occurred is our lag base cola at Blekeley. The forcer havisg bean pee-
wee, of this demount is Saturday. It should here boa viessly convicted, was meteor 11 to tour years' meal merri-
ment synodical swift tam." of " pow." be word rode, and the latter to duet months' imprisonment with herd
paste/—their lordships having brought their peoceediap to labour,
• elm mem days ago.
Ntit PSICS COVllT.—(Berors Mr. Jutic• Hill, and a
ELECTION it‘raNST.o.—The slectiOn itudi'or for Erdal Jury.)
Ism in. made late return or tbe espresso inrurri,d by the
STOCK V. 11411 LOW.
••••01.4 asenrv.ii.a cmdktaa M's". BM's.'" sad This was an adios to mem damages for a malicious
Weise" tee the emulsion 'brims of that manly. TM
prommtion. The defendant plaided not guilty.
IN& 1101.0" dl"led the elPe6a4 sad it "Ilanwhat The plain'id tea salesmen in the etoplo)ulfrit of Mowry.
easy ate gaged omit newly it. each, the dis•hreesiiiets miihngton and Hay, rot Manchester ; the defendant id the
irviatrthe7ram.o s,tha made, 7.12:1 4:117.........4"1„,' .I°l ~.I"ado,,i, Ma/10mM &goat ut Mown Horsby, and Co., of Blackburn,
Barg and the tremactlosi which gave time to the action occurred so
‘WW."'""/ """'r lots] up ntai ng far beck as IBM. At vet time the plaintiff was la bedews
TAW Ida Pd. oei his own account in Mead:baster, se a conimbeigh eye%
JET/134LS MARRIED A onOt D.—A skate jell i4Ttlell but not hamg eutacient capital to develop his camezios be
dialliss that KW.1410 mowed to AUWIIAS ddljd, u. ociasalted a fr'end, Mr. Osettiorp, who advertised em Ms
het whim Me *maim goveinrmat refuses lobes is Austria, belisli fur a partner with timsy. The dslesinnt M-
os lbw Pool 01.15 W eisnentos wer. 00#4. Ms, rat'iro to sewed the sdvetthstsent, an interview took piens Imilwein
Ergs awl ke esselired &as as Roma& dul.ros.'Ride theca ant (as rho plaintiff alleged) Mess of
übMam fey Illewise Me with them mid when they bee lOW were agreed upon. The plaintiff was at that limn /eemei
der MIN, whether tine wish to Leonine &await or for money, and it area olipalatsd thee the almilast *NU
ARMOR& miltil• litho later sheradeive be preferred by ' 'Avows mossy to latialy his seeneing Midas. The WOW'
ti Ow we how gait the empire within on year. The Wad to is canted on at the peasim aesephad the
reseer• •••••er. Isay.••• ils!D lo got tilt fr t in Marty -strieti and tire *MA vie
web" ad Is. 81•2 dot/e'". dens, thair sos-r•t• sh,ji seed them Ti. name met the dose wee elmegekts
he Wilkie asn Mimeo am be alive.—Jewielt Cl reipb. ' tow sad Co., het Ms pikintire ems was dm pima as Ms

door is alder that his mutemere might know when to fled
him. The terms of partiamehip were drawn out but not
l'ill The delendeat imprecise Ina or nawilliog to
vmsa°6 ogle, the plaintiff premed him for route ea
the a y mg the 3rd of May Sas turda, _he woe to leave
lows tai the y following. The defaming promised is
have eahequs with the cashier, hat felling to do so
the plet• told the cashier that ha 'meld go to
Mews. Wanted, and receive the amount of their amount
(til. 17e.) with the defendant. He did so. and on hie retry'
told the osehlee to credit Hamm Wtethcad with the
SISIOSIM 1111 she told the defendant, who observed that in
• Isla pertmeidp the practice wee for neither of the pertain
tedium messy seder snob circumstances, and *wowed a
wish that that pretties should be observed between them.
The premised oapital not being forthcoming, the plaintiff
loft the warehouse and west away. He was shooed from
Manchuntar for a short time, and on his return he wee ar-
rested on the 3rd of Angus order • warrant on the informs.
tion of the defendant ohergieg him with em-
bristling the sum of 81. lie' received from Messrs. West-
heed. He was taken to the police oHm, brought before the
magistrates, end oa the application of the defendant re-
manded until the Tuserhy &nodes when he woe again
brought up, and the charge dismissed. In tionsequeme of
the taint noon his character it wee with the greaten dielculty
that he entamoostly obtained a sitaation, and he had also
to take the benefit of the act ; and it we ceer?Lte them dif-
ficulties that the present patios wee dela
_
mantine

t es to the UTSIt

Inspector Bucklesy was allied and
&C.. Of the plaintiff.
George Bleck, the plaintiff, stated that be bad bean in
business as a commission agent on his wen amount to 1856,
in which year the defendant and himself arranged to bedew
partnere; lidand eat to supply capital, end the proms to be
equally divided. Plaintiff removed his books and stock
to defendant's premises, where the badness was to be carried
on in the name of 11. A. Barlow and Co. He frequently
plied to defendant for money for business parpoan , but could
obtain none. On the day when ha drew errs. Weetheate
account, defendant prowled to leave a cheque for him, bat
did not. He (plainuff) drew no other account, and received
no other taursey from the defendant, who add nothing more
about Messrs. Weethead's account beyond that it was the
rule between himself and his late partner not to drew so-
/30111MP. Defendant gave plaintiff • copy of the snide. of
partnership, bat did not sign them, as he said he expected •
friend would join theta with 2,0001. or 3,0001.
In cross-examination plaintiff said that for one year he was
fn businese on hie own amount. His traneactions amounted to
10,0001. When the partnership was being negotiated he told
Mr. Barlow there were claims egalnat him, sad Mr. Barlow
agreed to pay off the claims on lus estate, and take the welts
then existing. He swore that the defendant in consequence
gave him two sums of 2.51. each and one of 351. He drew no
other money than the 81. 17s. His debts in his schedule
amounted to 2981. He did not schedule Mr. Bartow.
(ties schedule was here put in, and contained this satry
tt April 3to May 2, received during this period from B. A.
Barlow and Co. on account of salary, 101.") He never asked
Mr. Barlow for an alums* of 1001.

W. Gawthorp, Sooolll2llloli, proved that he had ineerted
an advertisement in the Guardian on the Bth Muth, 1866,
on behalf of the plaintiff for a partner, and that the defendant
celled on Dim lu cumquat:me. He introduced the defendant
to the plaintiff.
The case for the defence was that a partnership had been
contemplated, tut that when the defendant found that the
plaintiff was in deb, he abandoned the Idea, and employed
him as a salesman at 1001. a year. The deed of partnership
was prepared by the defendant's 'solicitor in midair., but was
never given to the plaintiff, who, it was alleged, surrepti•
uotmly removed it from the office.

Robert D. Barlow was called and examined. He said he
was a cotton and commieslon agent in Manchester, and also
agent for Messrs. Hornby, of Blackburn. At their first
interview plaintiff told him that be had a mailable connexion.
end that he had paid out a partner with 4001. or 6001.
He said that he woe solvent, but when ft turned out
afterwards that be woe In debt, he (defendant) refired
to take him as a partner, but agreed to take hies
into his service u a steam= at • salary of
1001. per annum. The money he advanced wee
out of kindness, and to enable the plaintiff to pay his ore-
ditore who came is " swarms" to the office. He did not
agree to pay off the clams on the plaintiff's estate and take
the profits then misting. On Saturday, the 3rd May, the
pleintiff asked for an additional advance of 1001., saying titre
it would pay off all his creditors, and that whin he got cloth
from Greenwood, Massey, and Co, sad • legacy of 1001.,
which he said Le wee to receive from Sheffield, he would
rem the defendant. Defendant replied that he did not
believe him, es he had deceived him before, and be would
not let him have any more money. In the course of the
some day defendant acid, There is Weelberttesid's account
to be collected to-day;" and the plaintiff replied that he would
get it. Defendant then said. "I dolma approve of anyone
collecting money in my establiehmeat exempt my cashier."
The plaintiff never told him that be had received thie
money, but afterwards dal:admit ascertained that he hod
done eo. The plaintiff wee at the office on the fol-
lowing Tuesday, and defendant asked him for the money,
saving. I must have it. and shall take proceedings to get
it." The plaintiff replied that be had the money at home,
and that be would bring it. He did not do so, nor did he
ever pay book any of the advances. He then went away,
and defendut never saw him again until • few days before
be was arrested. There had been no conversation on the
Saturday about keying a cheque. He bad no Meth:mit recol-
lection who applied tor the remand. When he applied for
the warrant ha conaidered that he had jut•auee for it.
.

crcae-sitamination be raid that tie plaintrtf brought to
Mnrlyanet al: or eight pieces of samples.
Wm. Slumber& the cashier, stated that the plaintiff on
the Saturday maul be would collect Westhired's account, but
he could Dot recollect whether the plainbff toll him after-
wards that he bad done in. Oa the following Tuesday the
plaintiff said he would bring or send the mossy. lie did not
do so.
0 o

he add that tha plaintiff had salted

en the &Wolin it the defendant had left a cheque.
His lordship said the question for the jury we. whether
the defaidaat to obtaining the warrant had sole l fd.ely and
maliciowily and without remonable cause. If he had acted
honestly, bone fide believing the charge he made, and from
no indirect motive, then undoubtedly they should find that
he had not acted maliciously ; bat if be hod aced from an
indirect motivo, then they should find he find acted meltd-
own. As to the question of probable caws, it was • mixed
on. of law and feat. If they believed there was • pen-
man on the 3rd of May they should find there
was no probable cause ; but if they believed that
merely the relation of master and lament had
dated, then they should find that there was probable and
reasonable cause. Hie lordship dwelt noon what he termed
the extraordinary conduct of the plaintiff in tearing the busi-
ness without mottos to, or conservation with, the defendant,
and he elm pointed out that plaintiff and dofrndant when to
the wittpw.box bed diff-rod in every point, and the case was
in fact ens of oath ageoilt oath. The jury, therefore, had
.Imply to say which of them they believed.
After a protracted consultation the jury agreed to a verdict
for thspleintiff—damages one farthing.