The Express.
London, England, 1859-01-17 00:00:00

gee Oxioreoll4

Amlsmabb wail kw "The ==l:
It emleg /W web be et lb, Odbm bll.
by Tye Ft •ii es tie ay el yobllselbs.

?MN L'L47l4l4%llffr Tasz. '1 mr,
EL=2;7"mgasrs E 52117,1 %4

ROTLL 111101.111111 YRDI/.
• Ileisti• o•4onmew d lb* fun Mt all Sao*
Team Il• maw WV ALS WA ;•e. et liMasaWils,
r1:1=1"fratrilt1=Ii11111

Tim Itrime. Tall La
.02.11.1. illmanCbipploit=um
Um
Ltd lam
qamtitire. Mom
Ode; lift Inn F. IMO&

Trio lemma. mAlUar_lll, rad Oado
.I.I.I.IENMt I:4lluct.art=raggi

Ts. hems. MILO, LOairlk er,Tbe
fair Or...ft-Till MOS Or
?Bor.
runen
ariattl Mar
TI. als=lll..

, Case, of Nam
w. aremry. Twine.
11. Teabs4.—aal
—Ormaheaso as T.

sapersic
Tom Valises MIMI MIS QOllBl Off /PIM
se. The Pamirs 4 •1441 milk M. Jam lamb Mo. 41.16
kW. 0444 disMne.-414/ SIMM £OM OW MM.

MGR WATS* AT LONDON BILIDOS.
li'Vers== t t"----1111-1".: It :::

LONDON. MONDAY. lAN. 17.

Arun vainly waiting for many months, we IWO
at length a voice from the late Administration on
the impending question of Parliamentary Reform.
The toes is low bat suEciently clear; the tenor q
its utterance cold, niggardly, and doctrinaire; bat
its drift, like its authorship, admits of no queetien,
and it is at least satisfactory to know what we
should have got bad the late Ministers ever brought
forward a Bill, and what manner of Bill they aim
now ready to oppose. The horn pane through
which this light is now shed on the country's
poli.kal path is ea article in the latest
number of the Eidiallwrpi Review, professing
to gins the history and presperts of Reform in Par-
liament With an eieberats show of particularity
as to dates and empesseive proposals on the subject, a
narrative is prevented of bald and colourless facts,
calculated only to discourage and mislead all earnest
constitutional progress. Many interesting sad be.
portant facia are studiously omitted; In est a dew
instances grave misstatements are mak r sad
throughout the design is palpably revealed el try-
ing to persuade us that all Lord CiIITIUL Mr.
Fox, and the men of their time, valued in Rehm
was its tendency to curb the jobbing power of the
Crown; and that the only motive which tin-
riled Lord bone RUSSELL, Mr. LAISSToN, and
Earl Garr to advocate electoral change from 1819 to
1831. was the desire of breaking up the clues
borough system, which prevented the passing of
salutary mesaures. This desire we:are told was
accomplished by the Bill of 1832, under which Par-
liament his become a hithfal and adequate repre-
sentation of the waste and feelings of the nation;
nearly everything has been done which ought to be
done, and hardly anything dons which ought not to
be done. 'That the existing House of Commonable
• reflected with fidelity the predominant opinions el
" the great body of the community we hold to be •
• matter of fact established by the evidence of
*general neferiety. We defy say person to produce
" sa instance where the Hones of Commons sines
" 1832 has shown an undue disregard of public
opisise." If this assertion be good for anything
It is good for resistance to any measure of esesotial
change. It is a clumsy and prolix reproduction of
the old stock argument of anti-reformers daring
the reigns of Gamier 111. and GEORGE IV.—
never mind anomalies, the eystem works welL The
ex-ministerial reviewer does not venture to make
such an induction in terms; but he avows plainly
enough that he and his friends consider the Mt of
1633 final and conclusive against all farther claim of
popular power. Whitener motion of minor details
may have become nsomeary thenegh lapse of time
sad the host in which the Ant of 1832 was pus*
that masseur. we are gravely imenred, " ken beams a
" great constitutional lendmark, and has *ay set-
. tied flealol4l so to the iemederiee of oriotoendie
" and democratic power relish went preview/4y sis
../Ifurfrorssy Male."

Here then we have it at bet. Then is ao Isom
say room hie natal(' or denial. Asti-Itoal•Reforto
is the staadard unfurled from Cambridge House;
sad beneath it are ortentatioaely piled all the
miry impost et attack and &hem abide the
Et ooii soil Cs.tt.aaannts, etaileoe aid Pizza,
meek nee of is their day. Press the hotoric sana-
tive of the "intim envy hearty or gancrose, Mate&
manlike a, patriotic theught Is jeshmely eliminated.
Of the Weise wennd Ctaatwt or Pm, Fox or
Oars, Banco:rile or Pirrisr. Dramas. Bun-
LIT, *Wel: LA T Of °TOON fi.L. Oa a tfOrDSOi
is recalled. Believe the pros et Sir Cosetwsu.
Lau is, sad Reform et l'srliamset woe at ant hat a
war cry between the leaded oligurehy sad the
Court, sad subenpiently between the Whigs sad the
Tories ; sad the Court sad the Tine long so Wager
formidable, the Whigs Sr. coolly rmended that they
hare se Wert a motive kr wining say malaria
amigo Is the present mechanism of rale. A. for
the • outset's/at of istelligent sad industries* mil-
lions sow 'molest', winded hum every protanse
of a don in political rights, the oligarchic reviewer
don hot condensed to ails& to the reign
these. 1 hat manse woe - hay settled" is
whoa the Court was coespolled to Mks