The Express.
London, England, 1859-01-10 00:00:00

COURT FOR DIVORCE AND MATRIMONIAL

CAMBS.-JAN. 8.

(Beim the Lard Chief Janice, Mr. Baran Martin, and
dr Judge Ordinary.)

CURTIS L. CCRTI.4..
(Concluded from yemerday's Express.)

Lied Campbell (without calling on Mr. Forsyth) aid the
court had Mead moat attentively to the ore ingenious awl
abls address of the appellant, but they could entertain no
remonahle doubt respecting the propriety of the Judge
Ordiaary's decree. It mewed to him that there had been
legal cruelty brim the parties went to America; that during
their stay in New York there was abduct on the part of
Mr. Curtis, wham be ma be moldered se responsible for
his AC,iOI7P, clearly amputating lemmata; sad thatalter thee
return to this country, there wee also conduct on the poet Of
the appellant sot only that would hare removed the
effect of any former madonation, but that would
of itself have mounted to vends of a character
to entitle MI wife toe judicial semrstion. He (the learned
judge) me referring to what had take. place warn the sp.
pellant saw Mrs. Curtis at Mrs. Flood's house in Irela
Even his own amount of what the occurred showed that he
conducted himself so sa to reader It extremely unlikely that
Mrs. Curtis could ever with any degree of story comet to
Inn with him agate. He admitted that be said to her,
" Msy God tune you sad your father." And those were
the words of a podium who mete • great preheats of
relisco. No doubt he was very lacers in that pram ice ;
but what had occurred showed that be had no control near
hie owe helisgs, his own words, or his own settees.
The purser who advised him to ism the placards
Midi he had referred to, could not have been aware
albs twee, or lee they gave him advice that was very dis-
gentehtl. Those placards were most degrading to Mrs.
Curtis, sod they showed that Mr. Curtis wee in a elate of
aked W wkieh so confidence could he reposed in him. From
all he bed heard and reed of this case, he (the leaned
was satiefied that cohabitation Meese the polies
tit net be mewed se es to *newer the ends for which they
bed Meted We the holy Mate of restrimony ; and for these
velem the Judgment et the Judge Ordinary must be ma-
imed.

no elbow hemiljudges coneurriair, the appeal tree die-

TANS V. TANA AND RONINION.-GINTINCL.

Mr. Haddlonon, Q.C., moved that a dear of dineolatioa
of nerriese he pained to Mr. Evans, the jtuy having found
both issue is his favour, namely, that Yes. Ream had coin-
witted adwitmy with Mr. Roltineoa, sad that Mr. Evans had
amp:erne* ineoltod her.
The mart, at ease, gloated the application.
Mr. Maddleshos tins prayed that Mr. Robinson might be
oosdansed is all or SCOW part of the costs.
Mr. Retinal Pigott, ire Mr. Robinson, referred to
allidatrits, free which It append that the ocelrepcadent bad
already paid SOW. damages and 44111. cone, is the second
sena far arias. cos. In tke postant Ottawa be had caned
so witairows, sad, therefok Is conformity with the pears-
dist of " Lisa v. Ling sad Crates" " Law Joanne) ha
ought to be mewed any Wilber payment el mats.
Mr. Hodson (ce the same Me) observed that if one of the
onto= of atm. sea. had terminated alversely to Mr. Ro-
binson, the mbar bad been in his favour; besides which, Sir
John Dodeca bad decided the same imeue against Mr.
Ryer.

Lord Campbell (warmly)—Bat that decision wsa obtain:4
by perjary. The Imo that Tao mid about these promedinp
the Meter.

11r. Hodson—On the oontxse7, Si, Jobe Dodern expreaely
Name that he futmded his decision on Jr. b:vasa' own
wharf's.

Lord Campbell—A jury has now said that it was found(
ti Li =pry, and I Wawa their declaim is wholly maim-

Yr. Hods—Sr Jolts Redman laid that Field had him-
self disposed of hie ova •Maass; and it would hart heat
madness is Mr. Robinson if titer that dada:slam ha had tot
oaos more defended himself.

Lord Cempbell mod that without Lying down any in-
delible rule the pnal facie course mum be to condemn the
minimise in the rotas; and no reason whatever had been
shown why the court should in the pretend laminar, depart
keen that coarse. On the COllllll7, It WWI a vury Accra-
Wed rase. The verdict was waimptached, end they must
therefore conclude that It wei in ace ordance with right and
justsca.
Mr. Harris Martin coneurred. But for the conduct of Mr.
Robinson, Mr. Beano would have obtained the relief be sought
years ego, sad It would be most unjust if he ware not todeni-
ailed tor the expense to which Mr. Robinson had put hint.
The Judge Ordinary was also of the same opinion. The
Gl= of the adnherer with coats wee one of she billeato
the isghlatere had contemplated affording to the pub-
Ile whoa it pared the diva(*) act. If the plea that Mr.
Itoblasaa had celled no witnesses could be allowed, no wil-
lows seer would be called by the co-respondent. Even if
dap defence were an alibi do witnesses would be examined
by the vide.
Dissolution of the marries% end the eo-reepotdene con-
illemed in all the coots incurred is that court.