The Express.
London, England, 1858-02-16 00:00:00

COURT OP COMMON PLEAS.

(Sittings at Hid Pries in Loodon—Before Lord Chid
Justice Coobburt and • Common Joey.)
1110/1780N ff. WARD.—DETCNUE.
The plaintiff had bath a general dealer in Teek-sereth
Walwonh, and the defendtun we an auctioneer and broke.
Oa the 15th hum an agreement was entered into between tic
plaintiff and Kr. Clark, who was described at a merchant, In
Thames-meet, and who had carried ea venous bed-
noses, in which agreement ft was recited that la
consideration of Kr. Clark having advanced 301,
be should have • sum equal to corbilf pit
of the profits of the business of the phdatlff ; lad the wide
of the stock and ftuniture was charged in favour of Mr.
Clark, for all moneys advanced by him. On the 4th of July
Mr. Clark gave the plaintiff notice that he should require
him to pay the 30f. within fifteen day., in accordance with
the agreement. and on the zooming of the 30th of October,
he met the defendant's men to the plaintiff's premien, and
they removed two vane, some harness, and a hone ; and this
action was to recover the vane of those articles. At that
time the plaintiff was in Wendsworth Gaol on • charge d
having been in naked's! poseestion of some property.
The plaintiff said that Mr. Clark had advanced mlI
101. oat of the lb, bet Mr. Clark said that he bad brined
about the whole 301. in the way and another. Contradinny
evidence was also given as to the value of the repot.
The *Wolfs arm was that wee of the vane had bit kbe
eighteen guineas. end the other nine gainer, that the bun
had east bin 91. 10s., sad the harness was worth about et,
but the defendant's ease wee that the vans were not wan
the value of the born wee only • few shillings, sad se
to the born it was in nth estate that it wee nemesery
slaughter ft, and the mere was sold for 11
It mewed that then bad been a snit in the bud *Two
Court lemma the plaintiff and Chith, and • juror had WI
vithitnera ; Ind fa this ore notes questions of law were
rebid. It wee mid that they were and also On
Ohat vas familial la whin the
luso atimpoweeazdeotesiat asap to thither 131plkut
'ad the dishadsst ollsed to vs up poeseasisselths was,
bat the saw was art
Tins lad Clldst Justice said that Shwa WO NM area
whisk ammol a jnigabrtsimthae agasssi of his dosilsao
when celled epos is ay, sad he thought that this sM d
the He, however, met reserve the eeteetreathe dee
agreement for the court, and the jury maw whiter de
amount of the dosages.
The fury returned a verdict for the plaintiff
L,6l*
The Lord Chief Justice, some time afterwards, •.`
been informed that the phintiff's 'Loewy bad rebid le Pay
the ordinary court fees ; and be could only my Men M wog
tette in character with the cause. He thould nibs bin to
tee treasury as a Molter and leave the tram* to did
with him NI might be thought proper.
The phdatirs ooaaaal said his attorney bed bed to 110
away has the must.
The Lord Chief Janke understood that he hod passoll•
tally oatmeal to y, an that this we the mead use that
be bed been a In this coat

COURT OF BANXRUPTCY.
Moron Mr. Chsossinftesr ii )
rrr 13 BALDWIL-CLATMI 01 INORTGAGEICS.
MAW IPSO argued • lbw drys Si%
His Honour sow gus• *sant. B. rid—Than are two
portiorn la this osoo—t6 ors a b.kd at Edward For,