The Express.
London, England, 1860-09-21 00:00:00

lU.VSION-HOUSE.

Marin Gaufl, the young moo who stands alerted with
the commission of a daring robbery acoompamed with
violence at the shop of Mr. Walker, a watchmaker, in Liver-
pool•street, Biohopsgate, was yesterday brought before Sir
R. W. Carden for re-examioation.

No further evidence was adduced on the present occasion,
and the prisoner was remanded until Saturday, when the
other man (Alfred Watson), who is supposed to have been
his companion and assistant iu the rubbery and who in
under remand, will also be brought up.

A good-looking German young WOlllllO named Caroline
Illizabetk Sheer, was charged with attempting to dertnT
herself by jumping ,nto the river. The act waa committed
on Tuesday evening, bat the prisoner was not in a condition
to be brought before a magistrate until yesterday.
It appeared from the evidence of a City police-constable,
named Henry Stuttle, that on Tuesday evening he wee on
duty on London•bridge, when he received information that
a woman had thrown herself into the river from the steps
on the Surrey side, and upon going there he law the
piermen in tats act of dragging the prisoner out of the
river. She was in an almost insensible state, and he took
her to St. Thomas's Hospital, and on the way there she
made some rambling statement to the effect that she
wanted to go home to her father and she had got no money,
and she was determined to do it. . _

George Wiwns, a man employed upon the pier at the
Surrey side of London-bridge, said that he heard an alarm
that a woman had jumped into the river, and be procured
a boat-hook and caught hold of the prisoner and dragt,ed
her to land. If she had been only & foot further out into
the river nothing could have saved her, as the tide was
running very strong, and she would have gone under a tier
of barges.
Sir R. Carden put some questions to the prisoner,
through the medium of an interpreter, as she did not ap-
pear able to express herself fluently in English, in answer
to which she said that she was a native of Coblents, ou the
Rhine, and that her father lived there. She had been in
London about ten months, and had been in service, but was
discharged. The manner and answers of the prisoner ap-
t* be incoherent, and the general impression created
ap-
peared er conduct was that she was not of sound mind.
Mr. Sewell, one of the officers of the court, said that the
C naozr made an application at the Mansion-house on
y for some &sentence, and she was referred to the
Prussian consul.
. . . . .

'Sir R. 15ard;r inquired whether the prisoner had made
any application to the consul, and what was the result
The prisoner, through the interpreter, replied that they
gave her a paper at the Prwidan Consulate, and when she
took it to the place to which it was directed they shut the
door in her face, and no assistance was afforded to her.
Sir R. Carden said he thought the best thing that could
be done for the unfortunate young woman was to send her
to the union for a few day., in order that further inquiries
might be made about her. He at the same time gave tbrec-
tions that she should be treated with every possible kind.
ness and attention, as there were good grounds for sup-
posing that her reason was affected.