The Express.
London, England, 1859-11-24 00:00:00

ambit pi k mot requisite that .chid nail
my none.
Bir F. Kelly—l should be veep happy to relieve year lord-
ship, bet ea a OW dui carer on the mune which the Mist
took sad se as. of Ilia plata le whether the plaintiff le 'ad-
ded M MOM
to for aMe ea wash preside, I eat dread 11101
be
netumb tam te the
The Lord' Chief Erna—mewMy impremits is that I mid I
should mown any gaud= of law.
'lb P. Keilp—No doubt, my lord.
The Lord Phial Santa—The matter at how is whether the
Jirsotisa gins to the jury wee right or "msg. Ido not
'Wow insdat of form I reserved the point, bat nub-
IlthatiallY I did Sepposing we all agree that the verdict
wee a right one, them would be no right of appeal melees In
gave abe, bat I Mak, conddering the magnitude sad impart-
MOD laths imenice, and with referee°, to what wee stated
meths trial, we an bound to give ea appeal.
Ilk F. Kelly—There wee only oae point on which the nits
weegranted, and though Mr. Kennedy, in the coons of Me
motion, mid the verdict should be eat aside on the ground
that it wee warm the weight of evidence, yet he appears set
to have persevered in that, end the rule her been drawn np
on the ample ground of miadinotion, involving taro question
as to the liability of an advocate, that le, whether en advo-
cate who bona fide end to the beet of hi. judgment cooducts
his client's case, sad in the course of It enters into a compro-
mise, is Bade ton scam. lam afraid, my lord, no time
would be sand if you left your notes unread.
The Lord Child Baron then read the whole of the notes of
the trial.

Air F. Kelly, in showing canoe spinet the rale, referred to
the counts in the declaration, and said that the opening of
the learned counsel for the plaintiff, Mr. Kennedy,
full as it wse of vigour and ability, but abound-
ing in the most virulent invective sgainat the de-
fendant which human lips could pronounce, resolved
fuel( into a charge of a wilful, dishonest and criminal
act on the part of Lord Chelmsford. To meet that charge
be (Sir F. Kelly), am counsel for Lord Chelmsford, had ap-
plied hie observations and his evidence, and the learned
judge had no other question to leave to the jury, than that
whlah he bad left to them—namely, whether the defendant
had Gelid bona fide, or from any corrupt, unworthy, or im-
proper motive. The jury had found that the defendant had
entered late the compromise bona fide, and that he bad
authority to do so. The charge the defendant had now to
• meet had never bean left to the jury. He could not see
wbere the question, whether a counsel unless he noted malt
fide, wee liable man salon, arose, yet that was what their
lordahlps were gild upon to decide.
The learned counsel wr prao. dllen4s with his argament at
four o'olook, when the court
INSOLVENT DEBTORS COURT,.—Nov. 23.
(Before the Chief Comndsaloner.)
In 11 ItICH•ID OZORONNOBLi.
The Iminivesnot term bailiff at Roydon, in Bsern, applied
under the Preto:dim not.

Mr. Robertson °Habil appeared for Mr. J. E. Can-
'V end Mr. NMbole nappereed.
t. part of the epperlng asMer an application was
mode for an adjournment, on the greed of the absence of
material witnesses, sad a statement in the sebedde was re-
fined to. The insolveat wee indebted to Mr. Cuanington
Las mum 'ISO& far soma in a suit in the Moms Court to
&melee the memrlese with his wife for dupery with him,
who was a co-reepoedent. The merrlige wee dissolved,
and** insolvent, as the orresposisnt, condemned In the
Noes, sad to relieve himself from the moans bad petitioned
leder the Protection Act.

;eieellactiadae, rented the application,
sod ebb ars was adhearned to the ITtli Decontar.