The Express.
London, England, 1858-06-18 00:00:00

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.

(Sittings at Niei Priem it Weamainenr.—Befors Lord
Campbell and a Special Jwy.)
1111:0111A IL LADY DINOILIIIN-LIPAL.

The trialllV&A:ixtrawl ioarycTseeOl libel wen resumed
et the elitism of the court this mousing.
The court wee very much crowded, sad the grestest
interest appeared tote take. in the proomdinge.
The mum& eogsged on the memos were the Attonsey-
Genend, Mr. E Jame., Mr. Bovill, Mr. Houseroom, and
Mr. Yorke, for the plaintiff; Mr. Mecaslay, Mr. Lash, and
Mr. Harcourt, for the defendant.
Colonel Williams croareiamined by Mr. Mitmanlay—l
am the nephew of the first Lord Dinorben—the eon of his
elder sitter, Sir R. Sotheby Is sort of another of hie deism
The boodle of letters of Lady Dinorben produced yaefwday
were headed to me to look at. They are addreard to my-
self. The anon business. 81aco 1862 1 may have had
re with Lade Du:well's. Since the death of the
two Lords Diaorbett I Have seen her tea or twins. I taw
her in 1863 or 1864, not since. Mr. Mama headed ter the
behdle of letters. I don't know how long they wink Mohan&
la 1866 I rocelved a letter from Lady Mambas, askileg me
to resign my trusteeship under the will of Lord Dbortses,
and I replied that I did not think it ormilletent with my
duty to my doomed relative to comply with her whims. I
cannot Si a date when I mood to vwreepoad with Lady
Dworbsu. As I received her letters I headed them to Mr.
Blown, aa they all relived to the trust. la Lord Diembm's
will the children of Sir R. Sulkeley Mood before ray ow% I
Judge of Lady Diaorben's handwritteg entirely from them Mt-
tem My belief wee that theanonymous letter to Load Ramo.
worth was written by the same person who wrote At Mien
of lady Diaceben addressed to myself. That belief le hooded
solely on the similarity of the handwriting, sot on the con-
tents of the letter. I cannot recollect when I first saw the

anonymous lettrz to Lord flaeessworth. It Rest have
been more than a year ego. I think it was net as
early se June. 1862. I recollect perfectly reedy-
tag the anonymous letter, NUR wood ' Dear Tea"
That was in November, 1862. I mat It to Mr. Haiku. 1
dent think I saw ft again until yesterday. I saw the
moss letter addressed to Mrs. Hugger, dated Deo. ra
=4l y. I cannot Pity whetter/ I law it When No
sow the letters to Lord Baesnewettb ad Mr.
Liddell, dated Juan 1832. oboist dr thee they were writhen.
Re-exesained —The lettere I remind host lAdy Diaorben
were handed to Mr. Blozam to the ordinary course of
badness.
Mr. John Willis, examined by Mr. James—l reside on my
I am
itsysseL".7 'tad ;item. I ma
itraistllleier Wlis, died
es y 6, 1867. During her IMMIme she bad been in the
habit of staying with Lady Dimities. Foe the last few
months of her life she did not Ilve with her.
Was themesy estrangement between them ?
TM witness did not answer.
Lord Campbell—Wes there any mildew between than
Witmes—l decline to answer the question.
Lord Campbell— I think you ought to answer the verde&
Witness—My sleet was not phased with her stmt's wa-
ded to her. _ . .

Lad Fem ptell—Did they methane to tire oa the was
eleetkaate terse on which they lived before ?
Witare—They did sot. I tree at at. lacamird's idea pay
deter died. . .

Did yet; dad ma mamma Uttar thin after bar dnik
Witssm—l &cam to in tbo quiwrics.
Lord Csampbrll—Yos taut.
Mitmass-1 am placed Is a you, awkward posidow,
I should sot hays coma hers if It bad not beam tor taw Iwo-
matatioaa of Mr. Blouse.

..."11zameteLeTeos itched—l did had an salosymetee letter
ea the bed. It wee hoe epees& mail able my Meter's &nth.
I opined It. I have got the Wee with me.
Mr. Jemee—Prodoee it.

as-I
bound to do so ?
Laid Campbell think you must produce it.
Itzeselnation continual —The seal la not the one whith
Imam the latter when I opened IL I give the letter to
Sir 'cistern Jamie, s relative of Lady Dim:mhos, to to
Kr. Walls,, Lady Dlaurben's solicitor. It was returned
to use with smother teal upon it. I oceettinat to
Sir Liman that the meal bad bra o tinted,
sat I sag I wadi Lees nothing more to do with it. The
eaghima ad am• ma, but not lite the one on letter No.
I. The sal as Ito. lls a heed. I don't thief It was
isseetly like that ; It bad the semi a ones. Mr. Blown
my the letter teforethe oral was tasted. I as, have told
lin that it did resemble the met on the letter written
to Lord Raventworth, bat I won't swear that I did so. I
bard that Sir Kingston Jams Is a altars lar lady Naar-
bat. I rimed the left r sddrassi to my *Ow.
la oboes handwriting do you believe It to he f
Witosea—Are I nbbged to answer the quellan ?
Lord Campbell—You must do so.'
Witeen-1 believe It to be in the handwriting of Lady
Dinot.
Lordhen Cempliell—Ars you sequeinted with her handwriting ?
Villasts—Tss.
Tbs leder without date we. in follows

Z67.7rtib; Wae—l iT,TleareCthat you are not as
well se the writer of this wishes yon, but I trust you will be
erne. Is it true you re now prevented leaving,
as yea lateadod, 2,0001. to your =form= cousin, Mary
/at Ttr prom who indraces you has no charity, sad
erM raver bre luck aad your tortoise. Do not he gelded
by each disgusting avarice. You know your =-
fortunate corm has not one farthing. Therefore, do
as you istritticd doing, sad leave something to pre-
vent her sts • . The great God will Wee you as you
bops to re him. 71iak of thin, sad let no one pervert your
Id= hells= from this clarity.'
Wasadsatios ortinor Mary Smith, the " nallortn-
sate carra," was a dace of Lady anorben. She raided
a rest dad with bet east et the time of my sister's death.
M6:14\1•11 so= her= le Isar.
I fort saw Mr. Bloom about the rake
-au du= menthe ego. If k bed not bra for the upraise-
hider at Ur. Blois= I should set have err lire as a wit-
nea He aid the intention el Lady Diesel= was to im-
pels the weir= of the WO= la ill% arr. bay sister. He
several samtyreas title= tad, mead Arm those
Cstra.desillaraeworth. I owed* sr der the Mlle that
lady Diarrhea Weeded to =pre the hers to ray matter.
When Mr. Blows came tome et Debde, ear the
sell on those letters with the Me amnesia
Nmaz
direr. We rate to the onaeloslan that the
were not the Bare, though they were both a bead
sad very much tike each other. I prier had sat
big more than urea or lour hitters boa Lady
Discern, but I have era plotty of her writing. My deter
was ill all her life, mom OT ises. the IMO with Lady
Drachma in Pere in March, 1866. That wee =boat the Ire
time she was with her.
Mr. Charles John Storm, ermined by Mr. Jame—l
have bees solicitor tor Mr. Hoe= • family fare ere may
yea= sad Isr the the solicitor la this action. I west over
I. Dahlia to re Mr. Width ea the 'abject of the latter le
had reedveL He grader= the Mier which bee beta road
=dry. I had whai are the twe sataystone Won te
Lord Rarerwarth sad Mr. LifdaL I impend the seals
la hat perm= Prose the ,imat I is. =red I
drug= the =We tree reserilid fedi ether. I had me
dear they wen hapressione haes dr mere rd. I add
Ira that hen the shollrity el Miss Wallia's hariwridag
la were nerds to that of Lady Dlacrbea—a sladeefty
=id bid boss pointed out to re by the opposite ido—
-1 had rases to believe that it was the intend=
of the dedrdsat to endeavour to teaks out that the ...T.
WM Win =re written by his lister ; that I was satirled
der hogairke that I had node that his =tar would ad
tells well anxious to
therefore
sad was erefore
earth IfmialetCralgrol..l% never sold to hint I thought
Ids eh= was the rut= 41b.: _

(leesonotedTy hir.-M•osalay—The writ in this artist
wee =ad on the 310 at July last, and the declaration oaths
oat the libels ant lin November. I declined in Jelly to dew
die leen lo Lady Diserbses sonata, because = ereesal
wee oat of tows ; bat I showed them la Nov,=
R it sot all the Mews I also padded
sutler of Lady Disorbees remains letters, and two width
were set napped to ha remise. I.dy Dinoromes send-
Knew: Waller sad Grant, said their object la coming
he my dies wee to were a the trek sad it was agreed that
eye aim peeled between us slosh ad be mod es edemas
Mr. Thome Wi'Jiams, memised by Mr. lieneyeda-1
am a solicitor in Wales. I was reileibw sad lead agent le
the ere Lord Dlearbee. He died in 11152, end I g:msz
the solicit/o=lp to Lady Dinette' in 11136. lam acq
with be headwririeg. Ide alt balm Um Idea produced(Ns. 1) is welter= by her. The smell "w" is " what
is A. her hadwritlez.

M►. Yesaulay —Ob. it all tar on the "w." (Laughter.)
Mr. Jawse—lndeed it doss set. _ _

iiiiWwaoset;;ZricelsTAir eiftered to the present
Lord Ravensworth I do not believe to be In the handwriting
of Lady Moorhen Mr. BMA new GAM me directly
whether I th.,aght the two Intim we in her handwriting.
He indirectly wished to have vsy ophden ea the letters, andl
mid ft was my opinion they were not la her headwritteg. may
have said to hint that they were like her handwriting. I tell
him that there were many of the lettere which were Tory
Wm It

ii.r"Richard Bulkeley, examined by Mr. Jamee--1 ase
member of parliament ! Angkor. I am nephew
of the first Lord Dinorbee, and tenable ander
the will. I have oirrespooded with Led) Disorben, bat not
frequently. I know her handwriting. The letter No.
4 (A). admired to Colonel Wilitare, is not like Lady
Diatehres handwridag. The letter No. 1, &admired to Lord
Ramerworth, le not like her meal handwriting. It
Is mar it. Them le . penallarity In her smelt " w,"
and the "w " i We latter (" I wish Yon wr
is Ilhe her's ; bet are then other " a's" wbkk
are milks hem The leper to Yr. Liddell is elm Win
her bielvalthg. Thin Is •caof • " sad
ear" arbkai remblan her wring. Tba "w'
vrban: la her Wear sigrami m " Ego" 4like her
w." I tls nal bow virae all was is Hn babit at call-
IlagLfribisbus Sol MOM I lime net inn& awyeaseer
Then la • wadi Mho bast
PraWielbmewiLQ:6B%.4 " whore," wide* I lam to ba
anal= by Larby
Oseramaniad by Ma. lissaslay—l balimed bet that
the laram milbbi i lb. Asibis• election wee in be bra-
maim bar
as hie laid k was writina by Ur I
woo Ma as Ws= saps
say num Art I
lid Ibia
=mind by Ns. Nrmaman—l au • alms
at en Ilse Low/ Blembeale Impkvlb. At ay more ell I