The Express.
London, England, 1859-05-21 00:00:00

COURT FOR DIVORCE AND MATRIMONIAL

CAtBEB.-MAY 20.

(Before the Lord Chief Judea. Mr. BUM Martin, and the
Judge Ordinary.)
111111CIMONT V. MA3CHMONT.

la this case, in which the petitioner, the wife of the Rev.
Heavy Marchroont a Baptist minion r, had obtained a judi-
cial separation on the grousd of cruelty,
Mr. }faraday, Q.C., asked the court to appoint a day on
which to hew the respondent's appeal against the dtcree of
the Judge Ordinary.
Iced Campbell—What are the grounds of appeal Y
Mr. Macrelay—They are set forth in the instrument
bet_ono your lordship.
Lord Campbell (hav:ng read the document)—All these
Ctawere brought before the fell court when you moved
caw trial.

—lirriaeaTaay—hly lords, I tel aware that there is a diffi-
ealty—
Lord Campbell—The difficulty la insuperable. We are of
ophaloa that them remiss ao erround for disturbing the
siocrei which the court has already pronounced in this cam.

EVANS V. EVANS AND ILODINSON.

In Ibis cape a dome of dissolution of marriage bad bees
prosonsond, and the co-respondrot had been condemned in
all the Goss. Refute the trial Mr. Evans had been required
to pay into court the sum of 76111. to satisfy oho claims of his
wife's proctor; and
Dr. now moved that the proctor be paid his
coats accogdingly.
kr. linddlesses. Q.C., said that the petitioner's costs bad
boss taxed at 1,2601.; which the petitioner bud endeavoured
without sumer to obtain ; for Mr. Robinson woe nut to be
found. Under these circumetani et Le ventured tt submit

thattie psoctor for the respotadtat ought not to have hi.
costs used he bad satisfied the court that ho had not been in
collusion with Mr. Robinson.
• -

Lord Campbell rid the c art must presume that the taxa-
tion had been properly done ; anl the proctor must there-
fore hare be costs, including the roam of the present appli-
cation.

RATCLIFF V. kATCLIFF AND ANDERSON.

The petitioner, Mr. Thorns. Anson Hrtriid,a haltpsy
otter, proceeded against his wife, Mn. Frmoces Harvey
btatcliff, for a diesthition of marriage. on account of various
nets of adultery c,romitusi by her with Colonel David Ander-
son. The reetondont denied the adultsty, and sho plesdid
(verity, connivance, co donation. and the unnecespary delay
in bringing the snit. Colonel Anderson pleaded that
the petitioner had entered too an agreement with
him not to put him to any expense in respect
of any legal proceedings that might be keix diary to obtain •
divorce., peovided that be (Colthel Anderson) would under-
talcs to maintain the reepondent, and to psy the expo nee o
her passage to England, which egg emetic be (Colonel An-
! demon) had on his part faiihtully performed. Ihs petitioner
denied in hie replication all these averments.
Dr. Deane, Q.C., Dr. Bpieks, and Mr. Prentice appi ared
for the petitioner; Dr. Idetsbi for the temp ndent ; Dr.
Phillimore, Q.C.' and Mr. Addams for the co- to.pondent.
The petitionarlled been lieutenant and paymaster of the
22nd Regiment of Foot. and on the 22nd of Noire tuber, 1941,
he inserted the respondent at Poonab. She was then a Min
I'itts, the daughter of an Aker in the Bengal military esta-
blishment. Ihe pantea cohabited in rarities pieces in India
till Jely, 1859. and hot is-tie, of which only one child was
surviving. The co-respatdent iiined the regiment es a
captain in the previous (Motor, and he had sin*, teams its
colonel. It wee proved %list on the 18th of Ju,y, 18.50,
Captain Anderson had gone with Mrs. Retell( to Ku.sowlie,
where he livid with her a man end wife for about two
months.

Dekdrhalf ofC.locrl Aed,rsio, Dr. Phillithorl reel % ecwr:.

respondence, from which it appeared that Um.
rusted 0111 r visaing iwo his test at !Mashed, where the regi-
ment waa stati,ated, sed demanded his wet. ion against the
&Woe of her busbead. 'the )eititioner Milewed her, aad
solicited his grid oPo, es with e slew to a twin ciliation. By
his MOW pesos we at last natured between the reties, sad