The Express.
London, England, 1859-01-11 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGEIs
(TIM DAY.)

COURT OF QUEEN'S BE
'teams is Bow is Mary Term.-03doi
boil sad bufilles Wiettman sad 1

THE 1.11:1!EN 5. THE 111D1H-EleN CO
In this owe, which was tried before Lord
of sittings at Guildhall, and in which a verd
arbetandally for the prosecutor, who sought
the ca Knowles essistant in the Saddler's Compi
Ur. , on the part of the defendant
the finding of some of the banes
Lord Campbell—This was a mandamus to
to the office of assiatent in one of the Cit 3
good many years ago he was unanimously
office; be war sworn in, and served the offer
and then, without being summoned or heard,
011 the ground that he had air-stated his p
swims before he we, admitted. It is qu
my that he was justly removed or that he
be motored.
Mr. Knowles—But I apprehend the coon
wemptory mandamus to restore a person t
De has obtained by fraud, I shall not oont
missal at a meeting to which he was not e
regular proceeding, but there are cues
has existed in the mode of removal, and y
said .` the party hr been guilty of miscoM
not grant a mandamus."
Lord Campbell—That may be a ground
mandamus, but, u in this cue, the menden
a return made to it ; we have no discretion,

ft peremptory.
Mr. Knowles said that at the trial it ws
fall court to say how the issues should be fc
Lord Campbell suggested that the cote
should attend in his private-mom and tak
the imues on which they could not agree, a
either party being dissatisfied with his di
might come to the fall court.
Mr. Lush, who appeared for the proven
no objection to that arrangement.
Mr. Knowles also essented to it.

Decision accordingly.
In the coarse of the morning Mr. Rod
(of the Chancery bar), and Mr. Hawkins
pointed Queen's Counsel, were called WI
took their seas amwedingly.

PCULLY V. INCJILAM, NI.T
Mr. Bovill, in applying for an enlargan
lowed for making a motion for a new trial is
action was brought by Mr. \lnca
Mr. Herbert Ingram, M.P., for frauds
that be wee the owner of the Castle I
county of Cork, wher.hy Mr. Scully mid
He put forward hie claim on two grounds
been prevented enforcing' the payment of
late John Whir owed bim ; and, second
the advantages of the estate. At tl
very little evidence to show hr
could have benefited in any abate
fraud, or what motive be could
committing it. Tho jury found I
plaintiff with 300!. dtmages. They twit
and said they could not agree, and it all
at least a whin portion of them, were
that Mr. Ingram was an aooomplice
fraud. .

Lord Campbell—They stated the grog
viz., whether if Mr. Ingram waa an to
the plaintiff would be entitled to verdict
Mr. Bovill—lt is quite clear the jury
soy that there was any fraudulent lute*
part of Mr. Ingram.
Lord Campbell—lt did not appear tl
personal advantages, but 1 apprehend t
that he was engaged in this scheme w
Scully.
Mr. Bovill—lt is unneceseary for me
of the question in this stage of the pn
mama that the jury took the most nut
Ingram's connexion with Sadleir.
then Meted that the transactions in
long ago as 1862 and 1853, and that at
r was taken by surprise by the prod
correspondence which he had ne
had on opportunity of ersminin
trial, the defendant applied for th
papers of the late John With
of Mr. Norris, his administrator; of
mastery; and of Mame. Murrogh a
►n Dublin, with whom Sadleir had be
that it was only on the sixth of the I
had received permission to exam
dafendant'a solicitors had already
documents, and expected to find I
wished for further time to continue
order to show the importance of th
application the learned (comet me
ascertained that there .as an entry
Munough and K. needy, in June,
they had received instructions from I
outline of the titleof the Castle Hyde
sale to Mr. Dugan, and that be had i
laid it before him. If that were cone
time was dealing with the estate as
bebelieved Mr. Ingram had purchased
was at once amend of his ease. Mr. I
before then, and abandoned all lute
afterwards he had nothing whatever
Lord Campbell—There was overt
documentary and parole, to show th
Mr. Ingram wee the owner of the a
Mr. Bovill—l admit there woe cat
entry be true, it is impoaaible to say
Ingram wee the owner. I may rem
this is a question of Mr. Inge*
Against that gentlnnen, there's not
regards his integrity, honour, and b
Lord Campbell—tie was engage
with John Sedleir.
Mr. Bovill—But there wee not o
his honour and integrity. All Mt
to ask him some queetthas as to
Sodleir.

Lord Campbell—You bad better
marks on that subject. There wt
was not mixed up in those iravac
Ingram stands in a most respeetal
that his character was never hopes
affair.

Mr. Sarni—At the motion for
pared to give explanations on
reserve them until then, but at all
ships to give uu an opportunity
documents I have mentioned, be
make that motion.
Mr. Justice Wightman—ls the
application as this, for postponini
he the hope of obtaining addition
Lord Campbell—lt is quite no,
such an application I think we
genus precedent.
Mr. Bovill—The general rule
must be made within four de:a c
not inflexible. In the est reon
Brunswick, you allowed the on
lapse of two years.
Lord Campbell—lint there ne
of the period prescribed, on di
that other materials may be d
totter be contented with the int!
Mr. Justice Wightman—You
materials you have obtained wh
Lord Campbell—You taken°
Application refused.

COURT OF
(Before Dr. 1

Mr. Marks Geo.;go
of proenrataro-yentral exeman
Then was no other Lorinen