The Express.
London, England, 1859-08-03 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, WEDNESDAY EVENING, AUGUST 3, 1859.

flab ligelligrate.

.
HOUSE OF LORDS.—Auct:B7 3.
AM/LLB.

Their lord hip at as•inumblea for Moiler% ad boa
the following pimp onmoo :
THE Dt'UOTME rEtItACIE.
- •

•
hie war it claim of Thiebild Fitzwalter Brice to the
tide end dignity .f Brea Dentheyne, in the pomp cdrira
lei The cue Wu bike tisk twinning lest yew, wire
Ne eiclreet'aigree ned re facts of the ore wave telly
reparted.vOenoe mac tibia then up to a arab Fort,
old dr case atearand.
Ihretber evidence wee Oen, and the considered= of the
Mra.agdev oil% and Mr. Duda append be the claimant.

Tilt TAW/I PIZZA'S.

This ass a dein et Prim Rada* Jam** Freers
Quart Teas to the We et Threat T dOs ,gad
Dam et /lamer, la the a Tr ear, r
4
1 tersbered, Itse bra the hare sa arena as
)rt
ed*tre. liken this to ann.
trel . ea to-day, sad the eariliredts
d the are seats
tits
Dv. Tres, Mr:irodesTe, sad Mr. R. Berke spared toe
dinar
The risear-Osserel sad the Attorasrataeral toe be-
half sphered it the mega i both awes..

DISOLVICIT DEBTORS COURT.—Avo. 2.
(Moro ■r. Csamillmer Nieviy.)
IN RS WILLIAM)

This moires, the was daseribed es la ao mainmast,
rearing Croydon, INS emend by Mr. danced, an the
pas al the Loads, and Meth Wooten Railway Garay.
Mr. Reed 'Appsed.
L Muth. IMO, a esebleat econned at the Waked
Sadao ea tae Loads sad Meth Wiese Radwey. The
bretsat sad Me ink JOiseleth Priscilla, were presges.
They lose anis te the Victoria Hotel, at Eeetaesporee,
where they wan Mewled by the sages of the casseay,
owl shat • week's owners west to their sel-
dom at no alesplay slid the s-
='eed Crre• ins se • cospeastiaa say
thet sight have beta seteined. la &pusher Set
the wee served wait a writ for special dames to
the • Min TY ass which eras dehaded
Mt. Oster, at Gest Geoweseet, Westailasee. the Wi-
ens te the assiss, was sopped by the nay, whe seemed
a soden he the Meadows ad Laid Qmplood. whit tried
the ern wee of *New diet "ft was a logreas Om* to
impose ea IS empmay." Tbe este neared by the owe-
piny la rands; dr oda meowed to 1204 sod has
theridelties. TM rely odor creditors on the esbedole
were dee eltoroeybdoging tbe odors old • 'argon medical
animism

Mr.lirsoed dotard the EEC% of the car, sad r ad the rarepeai
empired al the perespertrest the Iseolirent had made cu
MOM. The 011111 la We aortas we amended, and 10/. paid
late mart as the reolrat eared that some china lid been
brutes. Os the schedule the brolvest had libelled Mr.
Edam Jana, his own crawl. ix seglectias hie car ; but
It wam class that Uwe 11011 as presser tat the and
that it wee • treedurat arks. Os them roue& he had to
ask for a ju4nsat, I. surd paler corepeare sad the
pubbc has aaub paw ramp at hapeatina.
Mr. Reed eshattwel that It we sot a car to pronounce ea
adverse jtedgrealt The lasereat did not appear to be the
what ed sea ; mill It we Maw that thae bad bra a
arias eteldeol, end the het that 101. lied bees gives rod
Id& petit We welt weal *fly the arm that had beta
. . .

It amoral that the bravest bad mar lend, on which h.
antion.
hod glow charge to hit attorney, oho had brought the

Bs Baum wid he quits agreed with Lord Coughed' that
k was • Myatt attempt to impose ate the compowy, end he
we OW to hon tie opportunity, • hint web • wanton
melon WWI to have bies brag ht, to proton polka oak-
peals each proosodinn
The court gave • judgment or throe calendar meth) under
the silkoodseary than.

IN lit R. H. 1714.1CHAkT.

Mr. Dirket Calms opposd and bit. Wet supported.
Tbe ewe bed been Fermi tune* tome the coast. The W-
ooly/at bad a pea: u fr,un the lull. Board.
Mr. Bicker Ca Inert complained of the manner ie wide& Ur
debt 'web his client hal 1,11 Incurred.

The court gave• julgeteet of eight mouths from the me-
in ceder.

Is called widen weabw tea, end segAffellat of eke wan, aft
in the leaderrtteg al the deesemi. The ',kir est firth
the the szesaten were It. Csesewell, Jahn Mani" ad
John Muesli • sad she saber/ • Ile of iM prior to
whom his felido/7_propity was ish, with "ens Ws se
Arley to J. B. They ha, thee, the madralde iheit the
with the epitome of the will we bad the led emlieff, el b
the limiting of the issemier. Without bowing whine the ewe
be the defendant' would be, he hot lame to say that the
*whelk 3, 2 End 1 snit stand or tai talease. In the esF
girl will of 1834, the testate had left the hem of his oc-
llittto Catherine Menden eel the remeadse
litttall, of London. By the 001namisse in ha
denied It after the We of Mr. Nolen to Mr.
See. Two ether poems were hqpiy awkwed by
the nal wW ; one of these, a Wm Midden,
MS. •thweetii, had keen he the seer-
,
vice of he meth.; end sandal was a 11c•
'haw, bat upon Ursa lesselso wen annuities to Mr. Mee
wed 112 w Menden. The codicil number one was
two of Mr. Nattall's ales servants who witneseeddirdel
who netwitheteadiag any &head tale they might tell now,
had told Mr. Newbold that they saw Mr. Muesli sign the
paw Wen they put their neaese le its sad they also needs
en ellidevlt to the effect. This was neesesery, as in the
to clease there was a slight inqe, lamenede se
it did at Mete that both the media( were peemed
whim the testator signed it. By thee proceeding' des min,
Ile meet of their clam, haying become amaze that there wee
• slight imperestien is the codkel, entertained an idea that
• brim peopwty was decedent on their will and phai
betas taw wither of them gars ant any intiniatitsr4
say hregaiwity to the attestation. The names of these two
men, whowould be called, were Brixton sad Gregory. It
Joao, 1856, tee of them reproached Mr. Else, by telling
his that a gentleenan had *eked him if 1001. would be of say
re to kiss if he would say he did not are his muter Gigs,larmiries were made after that gentleman,
aa but he never
again. In 1867, Gregory, who w retailed in
rs:reios of Mr. Kim, said to Mr. Else, Barks beteg
preent, " It is very herd we ham had nothing for saying
we sew the paper agent" Mr. Else indignantly ordered him
of the premises, sad he had never been on them since.
When Mr Else returned from turning Gregory if the
ground, Buxton repeated something like what Gregory
had said, and then Mr. Else, believing that **two were
conspire' together, took the advice of Mr. Newbold sad
the niaguarstes' clerk, but it wee decided not to probe •
erknisal charge against them, and Buxton was obs rest
dee discharged from Mr. libia's service. The laporteace
el this part of the eat was immense. Two ma hid
clearly signed the codicil with their own hands, and eller-
wards they sought to make money of their knowledge.
He suppoeed that Mr. Hams would not contend that theme
men did not sign in the preeecce of Mr. Nuttall, or that they
signed It at Mr. Else's dictation, but there could be no other
objection to it. By this time Mr. Else had bane the oar-
irey.,r of highway. for Matlock, and welder; • book which
It was known Mr. Nuttall had paesessed, 'mob was weds
foe it among those conveyed to Mr. Newbold's offer.
After some trouble the book was found, sad re beteg
by Mr. Newbold, jun., was found to metals • paper
lee de sad =domed "codicil number two." Theproper stops
were taken to have this opined in the presence of the execu-
tor., sad then it wee found to be attested by Mr. Job
linowbe end Mr. Adams, a surgeon of many years' standing
in Matlock. The codicil No. 2 we. dated 6th of January,
1866, awl wrapped in it wee found • piece of paper, contain-
, fag a newt upon • religious abject in the handwriting
of the deemed. This extrect it wield be proved the de-
meld nod to • gentleman on the very day the codicil was
signed, sad both Mr. Adams end Mr. Knowles would tell
the Ivry the circumstances by which they were able to 0x
the data of signing it. As the two codicils had bees &co-
vered, the parties whom situations under the will were
altered by them were duly informed of the fact, and no owe.
sides waa then expressed, nor wee any Imputation awe by
them upon the pantheism. of the documents; sad if it had
not been for the eurrobee and hole. pickiap of • professor of
wilting who gets his living by throwing doubts upon tilde-
deeds, there would not have bum asp Chsacery salt or
melee MUM. Nine months after the diseevery of
codicil number two there cams to light codicil
number three., which did not make any very mate-
rid alteration la the position of parties be the 141,
le effect Min to make M. Mae residuary devisee Instead of
Kr. Natrall, gof Loolon.r Boma months after the death ol
Mr. Nolen Mr. Else occupied his house, and at the bath,
over a stable, them was • room which it wee said Mr. Nitta
bad used as a sort of a den for himself alms. Mr. Else
employed a lad to clean this room, which was mey &eyelid
revered with cobwebs. The window was a high am, and
before the tad commenced hie cleaning, Mr. Bea, in the pre-
mace of the boy, attempted to epee the window, whin the
window board mese cams out, and he nearly fell backward'.
He was putting the hosed back into its place when the
lad cried oat, "What's that ?" and on looking leader the
board in a narrow recess they saw an earthenware jar,
which they took out. In the pressom of the boy, Mr.
Else took out of tbajar • paper packet, around which was
wrapped • CaIIVIVII pares containing twenty 'overtime. Mr.
Newbold was sent to,, end in the presence of the proper
partiee the packet was opened, and oodicd three was found
attested, ma number two had ben, by Mr. Adams and Mr.
Knowles, who would prove the attestation without fail.
Buxton and Gregory would also be called, and would be
ocastrathed to swear, as they had done twice before, that
they signed the codicil number one. The estates in the re-
citer way were all put up for sale by auction, when notice
wee given by the Nattalls to the purchasers not to com-
pel*. • salt in Chancery followed, and the court had or-
dered the issue to be tried before 'jury.
• anutbar of witneeme sere called in support of the
*half. cope am 'Wed above, which occupied the court
until its rides at eight o'clock in the evening.

Ara UST 2.

The case wu resumed at nine o'clock this musing, whoa •
Serjeant Hayes eddreseed the jury on behalf of the do-
fendaate. They had to try the validity of three diet/act dm
cumeata, and to solve the question ae to whether or not two
of these documents were nut in the handwriting of at beet
two individuals. Now the question which the jery maid
have to decide wee, whether the plaintiff, Mr. Else, err be be
believed in hie etatement that be found the codicil in • jar, or
whether they considered oat the other hand that they werenot
the genuine documents of the testator. Ehe mast sake eat,
• ft he could, that they were the genuine docammes of the
tanator. The learned coonael that proceeded teiTstal the
brought broht forward on the pert of the '
glazing with the original will of the his Mr. mesa He
aaturally gave his home and furniture to Ana Mendes,
who had been hie boaukeeper, and after her death to go to
bleurnzhew. John Naftali, of London. In the ft ma
a to be left to John Else and. Ellen Maiden, his vas
The testate, had she a lease of some mince at Makers, la
Cheshire, and these were left entirely to John Else, amietiag
overseer of the pariah of Matlock, but were subject to paying
certain Mucus es follows —To John Numb, of Loarka,
MM. yearly ; Sampson Hoe, 10/. yearly; Catherine Higimon,
401.; a legacy of eel. yearly to Ann Dobson, and 101.yaely to
Wm. Naftali, of Derby. His leaving them moue- to Ike
showed that he had • natural &Bad= for him. Thin
wraps • &vim of certain property at Aabover to Elise
Hieekshaw and at her death to go to John Nuttall,
of Lomion! There was also a devise of houses at Labour'
to Mks Mesh Trevis, meeting postimietrees of Matlock.
The out devise was a most valuable me ; it was property at
Brockhurst, to Sarah, daughter°, Samuel Holmes • servant
of his maters. The property at Benson and Matlock,
Weneley and Suitruton, ho left to Elizabeth Sheldon; it
appeanng that be did not know whether her husband wee
dead or alive. Now the codicils transferred this valuable
peoperty to John Elea; and he would lay that that devise
had been tampered with, and that the interltheation bed
hem put to by some one, and not by Mr. Naftali. To the
original will (A) he wished most particularly to call their at-
hletics. It was the beginning of this mysteries@ cue. They
had heard that Mr. Nuttall's paper. were all kept in the cup-
board; it we. there that the original will wee found. but it was
not there that the c oak& were found. Mr. Nuttall ltd been
dead some time when caw codicil was fouled, and dormer&
there was the discovery of another ate In the mysterious jar
I. the above hay chenille,. And here he would remark upon
the kir way in which Mr. Newbold had given hie endows ;
hat every one who know Mr. Newbold could not expect other-
mei trona straightforward honourable men of business Mr.
Newbold saw him a few days before his death, wbea he at-
tempted to get to the closet, but • ould not. lie died, gad la
that delft was (mad the will produced, but no codicil.. But
la • week afterwards they have Job Knowles. Job Knowles
says, " There is something else to be found." He makes
mysteries' statements, and directly afterwards • earth is
made aid • ccslicil is found, on which is written "This'. my
TIM' will." The queetion for the jury to decide war, woo
pet it there, and from what motive? In this will there are inter-
posed the words, ot Subject to the reedy payment of 1001. an-
molly tool oh Else, and OW. annually to Catlow.ne Marsden,"
after bequeathing the Mello& prof orty and Howell pro-
geny to Mrs. Silo-Idea. Would Mr. N kitten have done each
• Übe as order a preheat of 1601. a peer out of a life in-
Prat? The next event is the visit tel Mr. John Nuttell, of
Lesko, whose childrat he (Serjeant Hates) represented.
Mr. Naftali examined the property, and left the management
of matters to Mr. Moe, bat unfortunately Mr. John Nuttall,
who wail engaged by Sir Joseph Paxton to erect • notaiim •
long way off, died la the April following hi Paris laming Ma
youth children. B.oon after • another codial IMO found, with
particular of property at Bonull and epitome of Die will all
gleamed uo in eta old ego/elope. Mr. Nutlet, woo a Whims'
man. Why did he not go to his clout en his bed-ream,
Oka out the will, and etoach the codicil to it? [The burned
smojimat read the codicil, which gins en triunity of 601.
le Mr. Newbold, sod property to Mr. Thomas Naerb Jd, eon
of Mr. Newbold, s.,llcitor, and !ratos leeecies to John Eno
sad Catherine Marsden.] Who (sold toe learned counsel)
band the codicil? Hoe. Who benefits by it? Kiwi and
Mandell, and the two Mr. Nowbolde. If that wee • manias
demount, why should a large property be kit to young New-
bold ? Why did he leave 501. a-year to Mr. Newbold P If he
had been &Monate leave those gentlemen tegacias, why not
awhile them In that keg Bet of annuotuite who had been
tentioned in the original will ? The motives of the miter ei
the codicil, la inserting Mr. Newbold's mares therein, wee ID
get that pratleuou.'s lattred Ia sadeavearimg to prove that
' the codicil wee the genuine document of the twister.
Who was the wither to this codicil? Job Kamilla to
whom a legacy had been left. The learaid esansel
then called attention to the headmitimt of the
c dosil, end to the bad mania" of the aunt Wee ft of
• to think that Mr. Naftali, a man of tatelllgemo sad
burns**, could possibly make each nistakee t He (esejelat
Huai) unhesitatingly said it tree impomitele that he add
have written that ducausent. The Seat oodicilerea moved by
lieztos and Gregory, and there we. no doubt that they ham
mils two statements. He (Serjeant Hasse) had Sillaisel
than late Court of Chancery, sad they both maid they did
so, is, me. art it, lead that altimaristhey roodred

; 201. Mee from Mr. Elm He °Wended that evidence given
by men who told two different tales could not establish the
validity of a codldl even if the/ uses familiar but •
vulgar term—"until they were black in the face."
He (SerYstent Hare) wan not there to convict any
cm of fargerkeeleaut he aid the codicil was not
the mane t of the testator. Gregory and
Buena went last the sort of persons that could be induced
to assist in mesh means, but from the various statemeute
they had made no reliance could be placed upon them. In
on to notice the mecca codicil he would remark
that plaintiffs' 'Waimea admitted that they were not
written in the style of handwriting usually adopted by
Mr. Natal'. Betides the papers found with the first
codidl, it was dated thwt; what was called en (mikado woe
also toned. It egret/ that this epitome wee written at
two differ nt times. The Int part waa a of the
will, and the name of every annuitant. It the
names of executors, R. Creesweil, J. Marriott, and John
Natal Bnt, stuck in a comer, and evidently put in
afterwards, was "J. B. G. Codel." And lower down
the name of en original legatee had been tread, sad the
word "J. E. Newbold" Mated. It was perfectly con-
clusive that it could not have been written by the testa-
tor, bat it was put along with the codicil, in order to give
a colouring of mammas to it. With regard to the second
codicil, why me it not with the will? Why Wag it not with
the drat codicil? The learned serjeant then alluded to the
mysterious finding of the second codicil in • highway beak
icy Mr. Elsa at Mr. Newbold's ofilce, and planed In the book
abet with • piece of paper, on which was written a religioua
t. 'TM abm tele of the finding he left for the
vy to any whether they believed or not. Else stood about
ewbold's office for about an hour, when all at cats they
pick up a book, and exo/sim, " Bless coy soul, it is •
codicil I" He agreed with his learned friend, that all them
codicils must stand or fall together; they were all fated
fa the same 'miraculous manner, under the same mysterious
circumstances, and composed of the curio wretched mho-
, by. In this wonderful codicil the word contiguous I.
emit " coati/mous." Would Mr. Naftali, an educated man,
write thus ? The learned counsel called the attention of
Ms jury to the wrong *pelting of the words in this codicil.
This codicil was discovered on the 10th of December, in the
year following Mr. Mattel?' death. Was not the second
codicil from the same mint as the Heel ? Woe it not
In the same handwriting as the first P The same ortho-
gmMy ; the earns blunders ; and the same liberal bequeste
to Ilse? Let them just look at the evidence of the medical
man, the old gentlemen 67 yam of age, and very deaf. whowse
the witness to the signing of the codicil along with Knowles;
be says that It was on • Saturday night that he put las
hand to a something, but had not the dightest
idea of what it was. He said If it had not
been so small be should have thought it had been a will.
Was his story credible P He had no hesitation in saying
It was not—it was morally impossible. Besides, he con-
faded that the story of Knowles contradicted that of
Alms. Knowles raid he told Adams that they had wh-
innied es alteration in Nuttall's will, whilst Adams said
thee he bed net the slightest idea what be had been signing.
The consuiel then proceeded to argue that,Mr. Adam.,
in are poor dreams:moss, had been
1710 himself to something which he ought
wet le hew hoes. Ha would say that the codicil was not
wellies by Mr. Nana, and Mr. Adams die not wit-
am die elleplog of it. With regard to Job Knowles, he
mese/ le have always been in the mesa. Every codicil
that le bond, Job Knowles is there. He knows
emythiag, and throws out dark hints of other
documents still to be found. Job Knowles, when
'eked why he did not suite that there were other
codicils, aid "be thought it would be a breech of confi-
dence." But it turns out that in the second codicil Job
Knowles' son gets an annuity of 20/. per year. In the that
codkil Mr. Newbold's son gets it, in the second codicil Mr.
Knowles' son gets it. And now they approached the third
sot in this extraordinary drama—the flug of the third
codicil. Nine manila after the second codicil lied been
found the discovery of the third took place. It had been
beeledin a place who,* no one could nod it, but by • miracle
ft MI ftetemately been discovered. Why WWI not this codicil
limed with the ethers ? Like the other codicile, something
wee Mod with it to give it authenticity. In the other
adYils mere were attached; with this 20 sovereigns wen
Mad. It is dated in January, and one year and WIN months
&peed before it was found. “The only man servant," the boy
Me/ emend yesterday, wee taken up by Blatt to clean the
window in the room over the stable. He had never been
there before; and on being asked it he had seen Mr. Else In
the room, said. "Yee, he had seen him there ma, • few
days previous." He wood Moe to the window. Could they
have better evidence against Else; nay, could not the jury
at owe imagine they saw Mr. Else " planting" the jars.
The lad was taken into the room ; seizes the bused,
and the cry is at once raised, '• Hollo, what is this?" The
learned counsel read the codicil, which took away all the
y that had been formerly devised to her, and trams-
re=it to John Nuttall. stoneinseon ; Mee. Sheldon ito
receive an annuity of 301. • year for life. In the
same valet! the property that had been formerly devised to
Mrs. Blackahaw was revoked, and the same to be
left to John NIHAU, of London, or elsewhere, stone-
mason. Did the jury think that Mr. Natal would do co
Pea • Wag es to take away the property he had devised to
Owe maw t Bid course Catherine Menden, the wife
of El" is theeght of. She is to have an annuity of 601.
yysaeerr and nes is le have the residue. In all the codicils
Genesee Masks mad Else are rather taken me of. In
comasies did any believe, knowing what Mr. Natal was
diftelallsll6ll.% could they say that he less the author
afar sedislif Why all this Manse? Why was every-
Wing le be hit le Else and Manse?
and Else?
Why Aso' It be taken from thole to whom it was devised ?
It Isobel to him to be utterly impossible that there docu-
ment, minsented the red will of Mr. Notts') at the time at
Ihis drib. If the jury wens sot satisfied with the codicils
eery IPA give the defendants a verdict. That verdict
meld not involve a charge against any ono. It it had bon
In the other court it would have been otherwise. A deal
I had been said of the teetator's handwriting, but be would
cell before them witoesses who were illnglier with his hand-
writing, and who would state paitively that the handwriting
of the codicils was not the writing of Mr. Naftali.
They were not bound to make out • came against Mr. Else ;
they were only bound to prove that the codicils wore
not:the genuine instrument of Mr. Nuttall. Some letter.
bad been put into Mr. Else's hands, and ho whetted they
were in Me handwriting; and although he (the learned ser-
jeant) would not say woo had forged the codicil, he
would ask who wee meet able to do it Mr. Elm had been
' twelve yearn in his employ, and woe familiar with his hand-
writing. Who could imitate the writing so well as John
Elm? Who would benefit by the codicils? The greatest
gainer would be John Elise. Again, the blunders in the
yellow, He would read Rome lets re written by Mr. Else
to chow that be did mate great blunder.. (A
letter to Mr. Jackson from Mr. Else was need, in which •
meet number of meta were spelt wrong.) Otherwise it
wee • tolerably well written letter. Please wee
i' pleas," wait was written " Ovate." The plaintiff. had
got paper. without end belonging to Mr. Nuttall.
Let them bed one it they can that is not perfectly spelt.
Further, there was something stronger than what he had
alluded to as to the handwriting of Else. He held In
his band a county court summons served by Else, and
endorsed by him, in which he saes, " served the doughtier"—
the very enure spelling of the word that was found in the
codicil. There were two other county court papers on which
the word daughter is spelt by Else "daughter.' He (the
learned counsel) could find twenty other came, but as Else
admitte I they were in his handwriting it was cot necessary
to prove more of them. The learned counsel roneluded by
expressing his coefidence that the jury, under all the circum-
stances, would give a verdict for the defendants. (The
learned soleant's address to the jury occupied four hours in
delivering.)
The case wee proceeding when our report lift.

OXFORD CIRCUIT.—DERT.FORD, AuorsT 2.
The coennimion was opened here pieta:day emoon by
Mr. Justice BON. Both oonrts ware creed for business at
tee o'clock this moraing.abere are only four civil causes for
trial, one of which is marked for a special jury. The cri-
minal Wander COWALLI2.I the names of only rive prisoners to
be tried out for housebreaking , one for frond, one for con-
cealment of birth, one for ergrevated mitualaushtar, and
John Isaac Jones alias Robert Dibble, for the wilful murder
olliarrist Baker, at Ledbary.

was disoovered in a drawer in a room of the plaintiffs,
but how it came there subeequent events did not chow. A
coroner's inquest wee held, and the inquiry terminated
in the jury ending a verdict of Wail murder" against
Jane Ellen
.Farrow, the daughter of the plaintiff.
The daughter, then monad' of the murder of her
child, was so W at the; time as not to be able to leave
her father's house, sad a police constable wu always with
her until a day or two before the day of her trial, when she
wee removed to Ipewich gaol. In the charge to the grand
jury the learned judge who then presided ad-
vised them to throw out the bill so far as it

charged her with the capital offenOe, and the
grand jury did so. The young woman wee eventually tried
on the minor charge, and after a long inguiry she wee ao-
quitted. Fran inquiries instituted after the apraring et the
libel complained of, the editor of the Irpress admitted that
the defendant was the author of the paragraph. Evidence
wee then given to chow that the plaintiff had applied,
through himself and his solicitor, to the defendant to make
an apology.
Mr. Sulky, the editor and proprietor of the Ipmich Bx-
prise and N.e.t. end Suftnlk diferrarry, in his creeks-examina-
tion, said the defendant was a regular correepondent to his
floweriest. The paragraph in question, he said, had been
inserted inadvertently. If witness had read the paragraph
on its receipt he should not have permitted its insertion. as
his communication with the plaintiff would chow. The

piper circulation is from 1,000 to-1,200.
The plaintiff, In his examination in support of him case,
maid he had been in business et Framllogitem for upwards of
30 yens, and that since the alleged libel had appeared in the
Ipswich Express he had lost his Made, and that he now re-
sided In Ipswich.
Mr. Mille cress-examined the plaintiff et some length, but
failed in his endeavour to get the plaintiff to admit that he
had treated hie daughter unkindly, as had been represented
In the paragraph in question.
Mr. Mills having addressed the jury, submitting that the
defendant had been imitated in writing the paragraph In
question, consequent upon the ruction's prevalent at the time
at Fmmlingham, then called witnesses for the drideoe.
The defendant said he wee the regular correspondent of the
Ipswich Ezprot. Be had been informed by several persona
of the mods to which the plaintiff's daughter had been treated
by her parents—conduct of the moat inhuman kind. Before
the eaten was brought he offered to make an apology and
pay the rum of V., and since the action had been brought he
had likewise off, red to make an apology in three of the local
newspapers of the county, all of which offers had been re-
fused. Had no ill-feeling, grudge Sr indica against the
plaintiff when the paragraph was emit to the !pewit!) Es•
press. Made bmobles of Inspector Spode as so the treat-
ment the girl received in her father's (the plaintiff's) hours.
Mr. James Lerner, a woollen-draper, Framliagtiam, said
he had heard "dozens" of rumours every day to the effect
of great irregularity in the plaintiff's house, that the police
had to Interfere for the sake of comfort la the daughter's
sick room—that the plaintiff's daughter had been denied
the use of things that were needful two ea three days after
tutee " melancholy occurrence."

Inspector Sporle, of the Framlieghans district—l was en-
trusted with a coroner's Warrant on the 26th Jane, 1868, to
apprehend the plaintiff's daughter. On the 26th July elm
was removed to IpswieY. I engaged nurses to attend upon
her. I paid for the musessries she had. I beard a rumour
from one of the nursed that who wanted =miseries.

The Judge—That is not a rumour. (Laughter.)
Withers (examination continued)—Had • policeman there
continually. I have on one or two occasions admonished
the plaintiff with reference to his conduct towards his daugh-
ter. Had been called to exeunt by respectable inhabitants
of ffranalinghem for not removing the daughter from her
father's house in coc argue:lce.
The Judge—But theac ore not rumours.
B. J. Brown, Independent minister at Framlingbain, de-
posed to the rumours in circulation at Frazolingbaun during
the pried in question, whh reference to the conduct of the
plaintiff towards his sick daughter.
Hr. Mills having summed up the defendant's case ; and
Hr. Coach having replied,

His lordship, 172 Burt:Doting up, said it was for the jury to
say what amount of damages the pl‘intiff was entultd to.
The jury found for the plaintiff—Damages fit.
The Judge refused to stay oncatioa.

MARKIN&

COTTON.—fautitrooL, AVOIAT 2.—The make of cotton
to-day are estimated at 4,000 bales. The market dome
quietly at prices rather in favour of the buyer.

COTTON GOODS.—MaNciteenta, Ammar 2.—The
market is now rather quiet's than at the close of Ind week,
but great anadinese prevails In nearly all departments, and in
some there is still an upward tendency. The ptiscipal
activity is In yarns, though the treamctlosa have not been
numerous to-day. For China and for Germany there Is a
fair demand, and wry full pekes bays to be paid, the supply
be limited. For India the inquiry ham rather Blackened,
and the buyers far the boon nude are also audios& The
Prices demanded are still rather beyond what am
inclined to give, and the amount of business tar= by
this circumstance, besides which spinners are so well imaged
with previous orders that new oontracta cannot readily be
undertaken. Advice from Calcutta are unfit to
' much business in cloths for that market. In newly all de-
scriptions of piece goods for India the market is inanimate In
appearance but producers for nearly all markets am
well engaged, and there appears to be no giving way
in quotation in any instance. On the whale there.
fore the market is wrong, but quite devoid of excitement,
"The exports of cotton piece goods and yarns for the month,'
say Mons. B. Freeland and Brother, "are 106,275 packages
against 94,094 for the saws month last year. The increase
will be found to be chiefly to India and China ; to Calcutta
there is an Moreno of 9,793 packages • to Madras of 1,020 ;
to Batavia, of 2,227; to Hong Kong and Canton, of 6,166 ;
and to Shanghai, of 628. On the other hand, there la •
falling of to Bombay of 1,634 packages; also to Hamburg
and Rotterdam, of 2,399. The following classification shows
eta glance the proportion shipped to the various nistkfts of
the world

Packages. Lb.
Cotton Cotton
Pine Goods. Yarns.
East Indies
China
Australia
Central and South Am ato& ll.l .. 0.5
North America
West Indies 3•B .. 0.0
_ -

Coast of Atria ll .. 0.0
Turkey, Egypt, and levant 7.0 .. 20.4
Germany and Holland
Other European Staim 69 .. 22.6••

WOOLLEN.—LEnns, AUCIVIIT 2.—Thare ts no feature
in the market that requires notioe this morning. The tone
continues exoledingly firm. A steady business has been
%manned in seasonable goods, quite equal to what is usual
on a Tuesday.

WOOLS. 1117DDZEISFIELD, Avo UST 2 —Considering
that trade is healthy, and oar general prospects good, the
deemed fur wools is not near what might have beta expected,
which is chiefly owing to the high rates ruling in London at
pnreat sales.

MANUFACTURES.—}tooninanaut, Anorsr 2.
The buyers attending have been rather numerous, sad their
peahen. move extensive, s very rood Madams having been
dime is List doeskins sad fancy trowsennsgs. Low.priosel
union cloths are also to good request.

CORN.—firy., AUGUST 2 —At to-day's market a small
supply of English wheat, which is cleared off by the millers
at about lust week's rates. Foreign held above the Mesa of
buyers. Barley for feeding meets a fair sale at late canonry.
Beene and pram slow, and prices tither easier. Oats quiet,
bat not quotelly lower. The foreign imports last week are
as under :—Wliseit, 37 qrs.• barley, 4,998; oats, 2,148-
bean; 1,385; peak 173; linieed and maned, 10,829; oil
cakes, 81 tons ; bones,

Laces, At OUST 2.—Yeeterday we bed unmated weather;
it is now flee again. The show of the fresh wheat is
limited, and price' for such are well maintained; but the
trade is very slow for other *niftier, without alteration ht
value. Barley nominal. Beata make late quotations. Oats
and other articles as before. Arrival..—Wheat, 1,423qr5.;
peas, 24 qrs. ; rapeseed, 1,067 qrs.; bens, 111 qrs. Average
price of gram for the week ending July 30 :—Wheat,
3.776 qrs.. at 44n. 100. ; per, 10 qrs., at 435. ; barley,
66 qrs., at2Be. 9d.; beans, 60 qrs., at 46e.
- - - -• •

AIJOUST 2.—The weather the latter part of last week
yea ohansaabla, sad a groat deal of rain fell on Saturday
night. To-day is Gas mod dry. At our Corn Exchange this
day we had a moderate show of old wheat, for which a ready
sale was pod at fully last Tuesday's nue. No new
of
ferbsg. g soya without alteration. Wheat, whites,
611ba. to ha., 44a. to 48s. ; do., red, 60th,. to 631b.,40a. to 435. Barisy (thavalwir), new, 62Ibs. to 641 bee., 38a. to
44a. ' • do., common, 511bs. to 62115., 30s. to 345. Beans,
661 ts. to 6611b5., 48e. to 62a. ; do., new, 641bs. to
661bn., 465. to 48a. per qr. to ths growers.