The Express.
London, England, 1846-11-03 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, TUESDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 3, 1846.

meadow, by. the river, the deer made away, in beautiful style, over
the fields, into Sir William Payne's planation, between Maidenhead
and Marlow, winding round again towards Maideaheed, on to North
Town-mad, where it was taken at the malt-house of Means. Langton,
after a run of little more than a. hour. The pace was rather slow,
and the scent tar from good. The Earl Granville, Lord .town, and
between 150 anik2oo pereons were up at Mannish. Lord Granville, after
proceeding from Maidenhead to the Roval hotel, Slough to Mechem,
left in the afternoon for Fern-hilL lbs lordship's stud consists of
upwards of twenty first-rate bunters, many of winch have ham pur-
chased since his appointment to the maatership of the Royal pack, at
an unusually
hip' figure. The whole of the appointments connected
with his to
bunting stud are of the highest character. The
spirit manifested by the new master in every department connected
with the Royal hunt, and the determination his lord-hip has ex-
po afford the best possible sport, leads to the opinion that this
union will be one of the must celebrated for many years past.

tab) Intelligente.
LAW NOTICES —Tats Dar.
Cora? or CHANCERY' Weetentr.ter.—ln re Fender; mot',on and
petition part beard.—Lunatic Petitions : in re Sombre, in je wey..
ster, in re Wattins, in re Bickerton, in re O'Nel.ll.—Bard
suet Pell.
Dons ; Expute Butler in re White (2); ExParie Morley i A re Butter-
field.
Vict-Crasserumne Corim, Westminster.—Before Sir L Shad.
well—Start v. Soulby, muse by orders ; after which r petitions;
the UnOPpooled to be taken Int ; and motions eolith' med. Ater the
motions, adjourned petitions, commencing Kuser' J v. Nicholl'
part beard; Neate v. Finke, part beard.—Before J. Knight Bruce
Motions. After the motions, 14 cause petitio m. Before Sir J.
Wigram.—Fer judgment : Jarloon v. Pieterine, (2, ;
Campbell v. London and Brighton Railway, part heard:
Ikea; part heard ; Bunter v. Mackie* (as '.o parties) ; Plow-den v.
, Thorpe; Buncombe v. Levy ; Fraser v. Jones.
Corer or QULEN'S BLNCII, Wesuoiroster. --Sittings in Banco,
BAIL Coca' (Q can BLNeI Westrar aster.—Middleeex Common
Juries.—french v. Canon; Molded ; Pickford and others
v. Lacon; Franklin v. Seaton: Ivo v. Jones; Panne, v. Sheraton;
Watney and another v. Ant:lemon, undefended; kieliarths v. Lyle.
Coral Or COMMON PLEA% Wegoll'AßOPT.—Sittings in Bann'.
Coral' OF EXCIILIALL3I, Westmitoi.er.-3lickliesex Common Junks.
—Brown v. Davis ; Wylby v. Brown; Masters v. Abithol ; Teague s.
Fields, undefended; Webster v. Bar, Bose v. 1`..i,10w,
undefended; Barber v. Firth; Ersdbrer v. Johnson; show v. Dix;
Hawkins v. Hall; Evans v. Whiskin; White Y. Ilardmg.—The Court
will also sit in Banco.

EQUITY COURTS—YESTERDAY.
before the Lord Chancellor.
This being the first day of Michaelmas term, the Lord
Chancellor resumed his sittings at Westminster at half-past
one o'clock to hear appeal motions. In the course of the
day the following gentlemen were called within the bar,
Serjeant Ttilfourd, as Queen's Serjeant; Serjeant Man-
ning, as Queen's Counsel, and Serjeant Murphy and Serjeant
Byies as having patents of precedence.
THE TROTTHECK CASE.— PETITION Or RIGHT.-Mr.
Anstey applied for permission to present a petition to inquire
into the allegations of a petitioner for a writ of right to re-
view an erroneous decision of the High Court of Char eery
with reference to the property of the late Samuel Troutbeck,
who died at Madras, possessed of large property. He left
will, but it was declared void on the ground of being in vio-
lation of the statute of mortmain, and the property lapsed to
the Crown. Mr. Ansley said that he made this application
without notice having been given to the Attorney-General ;
such notice having been considered, after his lordship's inti-
mation in the case of the Baron de lbde, unnecessary.—The
Lord Chancellor said, that the exception admitted in the
case ref,rred to did not at all necessarily apply to this, in
which he did not see that the application should have been
made without the consent of the Atttorney-General. If the
learned counsel, however, thoucht proper to take the respon-
sibility upon himself, he would make the de,ired order.—
Mr. Anstey, however, declined to accept this offer; and the
application was for the present withdrawn.

Before the Vice-Clutneellor of England.
The Vice•Chaucellur took hs seat this morning at half-
past one o'clock, shortly after which Mr. Serjeant Talfourd
and Mr. Serjeant Manning, who have been appointvtl two
of her Majc,ty's serjeants-ut-law, were desired to take their
seat within the bar of the court.
Mr. Serjeant Murphy and Mr. Serjeaut Byles having been
appointed Queen's counsel, were alsn desired to take their
seats within the bar.

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COUR2'.—YEsTERDAT.
A sp cis] session, in accordance with the provisions of the
Central Criminal Court Act, was held to-day, this being
the first day of term, in order to fix the days fur holding the
cessions for tt.e ensuing year, and other business connected
with this e outt. The following judges assembled: Mr.
Baron Ald erson, Mr. Justice Patteson, Mr. Justice Cole-.
ridge, 3d r. Justice Coltman, Mr. Justice Maule, Mr. Baron
Rolfe, Justice Wightman, Mr. Justice Cresswell. Mr.
Justice Pale, Mr. Baron Platt, and Mr. Justice WP.tiams.
The. following memorial, signed by nineteen genth.men of
the bar of the Central Criminal Court, was preamr.ed to the
iudgeri by the Lord Mayor, to whom it had beet addressed
as the chief commissioner of the court. " The gentlemen of
' the bar, practising at the Central Criminal Court, present
their compliments to the Right Honourable the Lord Mayor,
land request that he will communicate to the judges and
other commissioners, that, in their opinion, the sitting of the
court at the early hour of nine in 'the morning is produe-
' tire of much inconvenience, not only to the bar, but also to
jurymen, witnesses, and prisoners."—The judges hating
Perused the memorial, made some inquiries of Mr.
Clark, the Clerk of Arraigns, and that gentleman con-
firmed the view taken by the bar as to the inconvenience
of assembling at so early an hour. Many of the jurors had
to come a considerable distance' as also had a great number
of the witnesses, and the first hour was generally occupied
in calling fey parties who had not arrived, and thus very
little business was got through before ten o'clock, so
that in reality there would be very little time lost if the
court did not assemble until half-past nine or even ten
o'clock, and the additional time would be a very great
accommodation to the jurors, witnesses, and the gentlemen
of the bar. The judges bad some consultation on the subject
matter of the memorial,but theEdeclined to make any order,
although it was understood the point would undergo further
con-ideration.—The followir.g days were then appointed for
holding the sessions :-18 16, Nov. 23, Dee. 14. ISI7,
Jan. 4. Feb 1, March 1, April 5, May 10, June 11, July 5,
Aug. 10, Sept. 20, Oct. 25.