The Express.
London, England, 1847-04-30 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, FRIDAY EVENING, APRIL 80, 1847.

bat for the amendment effected by sunning the order is
council and the letter from the Secretary of State to the
keeps of the Peuitentiary, the sufficiency of the return
would not hare been for a moment defensible. In this country
transportation, save with the consent of the criminal, war
the creature of the statute law. In Jersey as little as in
the country, was transportation recognised 'by the common
law, and it had never been introduced by statute. The
sentence then was unlawful, and so was the Order is Cons-
eil founded on it, unless the court should treat that order se
a legislative enactment and, farther, sanction the infliction
of p_unidument by an ex post facto law.
Mr. Lash followed on the same side and contended that
the return ought to be so framed as to give tho prisoner. •
remedy is law if the return were false, and also enahle him
to tracer.* the facts which were relied on as justifying the
deter.tioc.
_ _

TheAttorney-General contended that a writ of error Was
the proper remedy in this case; and that if this application
should be successful, a writ of habeas corpus would, in the
first instaece, hu• always resorted to, especially as the writ of
error would, nevertheless, be available. The fallacy on the
other side lay in the confounding with the functions of a
court of apical the functions whic`t thin court exercised on
a writ of habeas corpus. In discharging the functions last-
named, the court would, in this instance, confine its in-
quiries to two points; first, was the royal court of Jersey of
competent jurisdiction to adjudicate on this ease, and pass
this sentence t—secondly, did the existence of that coinpe•
tent jurisdiction 'sufficiently appear on the face of the return ?
In the ease of Citrus Wilson, the court had refused to ex-
amine the propriety of a sentence by the court of Jersey,
when once it was satisfied that the jurisdiction to pronounce
it existed, and so it would refuse in the case of a sentence
by a Scotch court. There never had been an instance
of interference with the sentence of a court of competent
jurisdiction, an.l tho Court of Jersey was es erimnetent and
as independent as the Court of
of the Canadian prisoners was not in point, for there the court
had passed sentence of death, and the transportation was a
voluntary arrangement of the prisoners with the court, te
escape the capital punishment. Here the custody was war-
ranted by the sentence, which was planed by a court of com-
petent jurisdiction ; and in Poch a ease the place of confinentent
was not essential to the jurisdiction. As to the appointment
under the sign =smut the question really was whether there
was an authority t t order detention, and if necessary the
court would infer Cid the place was a proper one, especially
as by the 6 it 7 c. 26, Milbank pnson had been consti-
tuted a prison fur such purposes as were described in the
previous statutes. For these reasons he submitted that the
court would refuse to discharge the prisoners.
Mr. Crowder, in reply, contended it hail not been shown
that the court of Jersey had power to transport ; the in-
ference was that it had not.
_ _

The Attorney-Gen : I must not be taken to admit that.
Mr. Justice Patterson: The question is whether you ought
not to have shown, on the taco of the return, that the power
existed. The court postponed its judgment.

BAIL COURT.
before Kr. Juana, Coleridge.
Ex PARTE OEOllOs. FIMUELLICI MUNTZ, Eon., M.P.—
CRIMINAL INFORMAI lON FOIL LIIIEL.—Sir F. Theaiger
moved for a rule calling on John Brathwaite, the proprietor,
and Charles Whyraan, the printer and publisher of the
Railway Times newspaper, to show cause why a criminal
, information should not NI filed against them for an article
which appeared in their paper of the 17th instant, reflecting
on the character of CI. F. Monts, Esq. , member for Birming-
ham, and which was calculated to do him irreparable injury.
It appeared tkrit in Aug, at, 180. Mr. Moots. at etwin-
stance of a Mr. Charles S'saw, of Birmingham, became eon-
nected with the Direct Birmingham and Leicester Railway,
took 100 shams, and was afterwards appointed chairman,
Mr. Shaw being siee-cha'retan. The capital of the com-
pany was 600,0001., in 111. shares, deposit 21. 2e. per
share, which were allotted, and 52,0001. collected. When
the bill went before parliament the company got rid of the
'opposition of several competing lines, but the Linden and
lsurth Western having con issued theirs, the bid was thrown
out on the third reading. I t was then arranged that 11. per
share should be returned to the shareholders. After the
liabilities were paid, Mr. M nts was active in the settlement
of the affairs of the comp ny, the hills were reduced by
4,0001., and a balance-sheet was pupated which would soon
be exhibited, when the a :rpluo would be divided. Mr.
Muntr's attention was called to an article, which appeared
on the 19th alibis month, in the Railway Times.

Wm two isembses tor Birdtlegham, Mr. Monts and Mr. Spooner,
maw met nnibrhalitie In their I silway coailexions. They eves to
bawl p=alaserreral whew; which the mania of MO brought
arimeiderstios as to the consequences to their own
=Ai fur ilts ammeseall world ; and hence they mtut bare eery
often be kimilwas Monleed with certain schemers who were mot
=lramerms hi their proceedir Ira TM.% might have been
n a miiilmtnne, and nu 7 mieht knee Wained afinpatby,
if tiff had shiner that their sitedion was distasteful to them, er if
they bag taken ago to extricate th ittaelrat from it But or Wing
dem ao, thi y a be condemned wit certain bubble-Noma, whom
charastore leave reader an Indelible mark. Certain were
cowshed with .churn, me of whiat turned oat • sod
triers. hobble: we mama the D. rect Birmingham imilAlswlst
Barry C=icairj, art wizen that • more diagramed boar weit
me tar was fa paha. it was diagrantal. berm k
was • wigpskal bp Ow names at ass iit WO Maim
assoakirl with ma ski. to eiy the had al tkoi. how
redraw' anything be audit an the sisranalk WV.
Mr. Mots was at the mw'/ tide oompeny, sad Imp prim so
the liiii are name, teak Glare, in the hope that • ire brims lie-
rologres sad rierre wear he carried out; they zero wild Orr
gam
Area Mee* Welt bar der so st a parremerd to Ibis
day ban rem sot ef Orr mei owl ass /stater/rem As
we have babeswf, a know amnia he Sam of .wees•
viable notoriety iris parries dwessykkg con-
nected with the maga% and we red mg Parke rto the
ratios etre 'Maki igtha eampay. We sok Mr. Maar Who re
deliberald y wearer the psosseasss wfddi haw, tekdil *Ai with
respect to this biliblw We ad if • aomestio with mob a state of
things bilks the diameter of • aserher at MI _ Welatore, ropmernt-
ing • imp ammeniel constilamey no Minolin. If he gnawers
in tie idianstive, hi. nodose id pronekety met have very mar
2=betiro became i provirsal director. We cull on Mr.
en dolma of title connimiliy, V. 'lndent Ilia paitioo in the
cemmulllnid Mudd. end to worealse dale to those deluded and plun-
dered shereimblima We call or kir to verify limmell frown the stigma
which Ids temodsa wits Certaill individuals in Birmingham has
nowswirtly berthed Whim, and by doing Justice to others, to render
It ale to WNW"

All Them statements Mr. Manta denied on affidavit.—Mr.
Justice Coleridge Tee article only implies that there may
be criminal participation with other.—Sir F. Tbesiger : It
styli a stigma attaches to him.—Mr. Justice Coleridge : Will
attach. It does not impute anythine to Mr. Muntr. If the
application had been made by Mr. Shaw, there would be no
doubt about it, hut he makes DJ application.—Sir F.
Thesiger : Mr. Mutes feels that there are attacks ma his
character likely to injure him with his constituents, end it is
necessary he should hare the protection of the court. —Mr.
Jir ties Coleridge: This application is very likely to lead to
a disavowal, and therefore you may take a rule. Rule
granted.
TUE BISMINONAN AND OXPORD RAILWAT.—MANDL.
311:3 to ELECT. Dusucroeso—Mr. Cockburn moved/me be.
half of twelve shareholders of the Birmingham and Oxford
Railway Company, fora rule calling on P. H. Mentz, Esq.,
aid the other directors of the company, to show causw why
a mandamus should not issue commanding them to retest by
ballot four of their number to retire from office, end to call
a general meeting of the shareholders, in order to elect
four others to supply their places. The case had oc-
cupied much time in two departments of the Court of
Chancery, and the result was that the plaidies in
those proceedings had been sent to a court of law. The
question arose on two acts of partially nt, the Bih Vie. c. 16,
The Companies' Clauses Coesolidati in Act," and the one
by which this company was constituted, 9th and 10th Vie.
c. 338. The provisions of the general act relating to the
vacating of offices by directors, were a untamed partly in the
83rd section, which provided that the directors,appoiated by
a special act should continue in office until the next general
meeting after the special act was pewee I, and then that others
should he elected in their places. The 66th section provided
that ordinary meetings should be held within a month after
the special set peeled, or in February and August in each
year; and the directors appointed at the first meeting should
continue till the first ordinary meeting. The 88th si ctiun
provided that the directors appointed by the special set
shon'd retire at the end of the first year after their election,
and that one-third of them should be s lected by ballot among
themselves to retire, and their places he supplied by qualified
shareholders, or they might he re-elected. Those provisions
might be modified and controlled by a special met. In the
special act by which the company was oonstituted, the first
provision which was not contained in the general act
was the 16th section, which }seeded that the first
ordinary meeting should be hell' within six months
after the passing of the act. 3 he 12th section pro-
vided that the directors should oortinue till the first
ordinary meeting, when the shareholders might. continue
them, or elect a new bodrar pert atheist. The UM sec-
tion was the one on which the questions had been diemased
in the Courts of Chancery. It provided that at the first
ordinary meeting held in the year next after the! year in
which the lest-mentioned directors were appointed, the
shareholders should elect directors to supply the places of
those retiring under the provisions of the Companies' Clauses
Consolidation Act. The act constituting the eompaay was
pawed in August, 1846. The then directors were to can-
tinue in office till the first ordinary meeting, which would be
held within six months. It was held on Octeber 30, when
the shareholders continued the directors with certain excep-
tions, in whose places others were clotted. The question
then arose how long they were to continue in office, and
whether new directors would be neeessary in February, 1647,
when there would be an ordinary emitting under the provi-
sions of the general act. A great change, however, had
taken place in the views of the shareholders, for a proposi-
tion had bees made by the Great Western Company to elllT-
dun the line. By the 37th acre, the shareholders
had power to sell to the Great Western, or if that
wee not des% there was a power by which the
Greet Weems ehe.M he allowed to use the line on such
terns me &add be Grad en. Alter the meeting of the
30th October the direeten, several of whoa were dieaatoei
of the Great Western, entered Into an to sael-
gamate
the Illsainghosa sad Oxford with taelfendesham,
Dailey and Mel Company. From this seem
of the shareholders tithe and Ocisatilleamewl,
because, Maack' the alone td litaingbant and Dudley
were at a premium, yetellM7 'Were mita as highs .
as their own, and the thought *Nee* vlroddlimtes ,
the premium of the bma and Dudley shares, mai
to lower their own, and in et, that the time
compani:a would mate a new line, w male ampule
with the London and North-Weetern. Thay amebt that
they could make better terms if they renew. -
tint company, and, et any tam, es the famden melt-
Western had an interest In poreharing the link. that better
terms could be obtaieed trout that company; any they called
on the directors not to complete the arreagmaat with the
Great Western. Sic out of the twelve dinettes wean aloe
directors of the Birmingham and Dudley, mad those were
directors of the Great Western. A kentna mai( was
called fur the 4th of December, to ratify this apeman
with the Great Western. Previous to this, the Mares of the
Oxford Lod Birmingham being St a prentinna,diere hod been
much dealing in them and many of them had changed

heads. Up to this time no sealed certificates bad her
issued., nor were they to be imbed till Dee. 14, and so many
scrip certificates were still out that many pervons were Rot
in • situation to vote. The shareholders, therefore, called
on the directors to postpone the meeting till after Dec. 14.
This they declined, sad et the meeting a revolution was pro-
posed that the meeting should be adjourned, but it was loft,
and the directors got the confirmation of the agreement
carried. Before this a regoftition had been made for a
general extraerdinary mating, under section 70 of the
general act. Logged of oalliag this niceties in 14 days the
direftwe managed to postpone it till the last moment
allowed by law, so that it took place after the ordinary
meeting se-geb,
_namely, oe March 13. The great pro-
portion of the ral,ders were adverse to theft proceedings,
bed they called isei the directors to determine which four of
them should go out of office. This they refused to do, and I
were in office now. The object of the present proceeding
was to try the validity of that act. At the meeting of 13th
March the shareholders elected six of their body as additiocel
directors, so as to enable them to contra the essiluct of the
others. It turned out that just precious to the extraordinary
meeting the directors had appointed a committee of their
body, seven in number, a large proportion of whom were
directors of the Birmingham and Dudley Company, and two
of the Great Western, thereof whom constituted • quorum,
and thereby they transferred to them nearly 01l their powers,
not merely on the question of this agreement, but every
power incidental to the office of directors, and they had
held a meeting of the board since; go that they had rendered
the election of the directors by the shareholders a nullity.
A bill fur an injunction to restrain the directors in the par-
liamentary smalgamstion of the companies had been filed,
and the case was heard before the Vice-Chancellor of
England, who decided that four directors should
have retired.—An appeal was carried to the Lord
Chancellor, who decided against the decree of the Vice.
Chancellor, but left the menu of tie case entirely un-
touched. Objections were made to the filing of the bill by
the shareholders, and it was urged that it should have been
done by the *hole company in its corporate character ; and
besides, that u it was intended to disfranchise individuals, a
court of equity had no jurisdiction. It was on those grounds,
and not with reference to the act of parliament, that the de-
cree of the Vice-Chancellor was reversed, and the court
directed that an application should be made to the Court of
Queen's Bench.—ltule Dig granted.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.
Bitting. In Banco.
DOE. DRY WOOD O. WILEINS. MIL JAMES WOOD'S
WlLL.—Tbis was an action of ejectment, brought to
recover a conenderable part of the property of the
celebrated millionnaire, the late Mr. James Wood, bet-
ter known as " Jemmy Wood," of Gloucester. The
cause was tried beLre Mr. Justice Mania, at the last
summer essises for Gloucester, when a verdict passed
for the defendant. The real question at issue between
the parties was, whether a certain register of baptism was
genuine or forged, foe the purpose of maintaining the claim
to the late Mr. Wood's property.
Sir Fitzroy Kelly, Q.C., showed cause yesterday against a
rule for a new trial obtained on the ground of the improper
reception of evidence. It appeared that, with a view to
support the allegation that the document in queetion was
fabricated, it was proved that the lessor of the plaintiff and
one John Bowen had been on very intimate terms, and ex-
tensively engaged in pecuniary treneactions, just shout
the period when the alleged forged instrument was said to
have been found in a repository ; and it was suggested that
Bowen was a party to the forgery. This was the evidence,
the admission of which formed the ground for the rule nisi ;
and the learned counsel argued that it was clearly 'denia-
-1 rible, regerd being had to the real question at imam lsetween
the partws.
Mr. Serjcant Talfourd (having been called on by the court
before Sir F. Kelly had concluded his argument) contended
that no snob agency was proved to have existed between
Bowen and the lessor of the plaintiff as would authorise the
admission of evidence as to Bowen's circumstances and cha-
racter. Upon the merits the plaintiff should have had a
verdict, and it was therefore but justice to afford him an op-
portutoty of having the =WC tried again.—The Court saw
no reason why there should be a new trial on the ground
that the verdict was against evidence, as the lessor of the
plaintiff might bring another action. The evidence said to
have been improperly received was clearly admirable.

POLICE.-YEATERDAT.

GUILDHALL.—CIISKOE or EMPEZZIJSUENT.—George
Emery Langley was charged with embezzling various sums
of money belonging to his employer, Mr. Lewis Berger,
wholesale oil and Roman vitriol manufacturer, City-wharf,
Upper Thames-street—The complainant stated that the
prisoner was employed as a clerk for the last three years.
It was his duty to collect money, and also to receive whatever
was paid to other parties employed in the business. On
making an application to a customer against whom there were
two or three outstanding sums, and who, according to the
prisoner'. statement, had paid no money since the year 1845,
complainant found he had made three or four payments in
the year 1816. Alderman Musgrove remanded the prisoner
fora-week. On being removed, the prisoner asked if he
might be admitted to bail, which was refused ; but eventually,
at the request of the master, Alderman Musgrove consented
to accept bail for his appearance.
WORSHIP-STREET.—Orza• GLASSEB.—F. Wittick
was cheesed with having stolen a large number of
opera glasses, of the value of 801., the property of his em-
ployers, Messrs. Bongrand and Co., of Queen-street, Cheap-
side.—M. Estee= Jecquet, a partner in the firm, stated
that the prisoner had only been a short time in their ser-
vice when witness was compelled to go to Paris on business,
and upon examining the stock, soon after his return, he dis-
covered that a large qoantity of expensive opera glasses had
disappeared, but not the slightest suspicion was entertained
of the prisoner. Some very decisive circumstances, however,
transpired about a week afterwards, which clearly indicated
the prisoner as the depredator, and he was closely
questioned upon the subject. After considerable hesitation
and evasions, he at length banded to him about thirty dupli-
cates, all of them relating to opera-glasses, pledged at
various pawnbrokers, and urged in extenuation of his mis-
conduct, that he had been driven to dishonesty by
the privations and distress of his wife and three
children. On being called upon for his defence, the
prisoner, who was so greatly affected and depressed that his
loins was almost inaudible, acknowledged the truth of the
facts against him, but pleaded the distress of his family, and
said that the prosecutors had at first consented to accept an
assignment of his little furniture as an indemnification for
their loss, but had afterwards declined to carry out that ar-
rangement.—Mr. Arnold ordered the prisoner to be brought
up the formal attendance of the pawnbrokers,
when again for
ewou
ld be fully committed for trial.
MARLBOROUGH-STREET.—THa Case or THE
COUNTESS or MOHNINOTON.—The Couateea of Morn-
ington came before Mr. Bingham, to make the usual
declaration on oath of her being in such a Mate of destitution
as to require parish relief, in order to enable the parish
authorities of St. George's, Hanover-square, on whom her
ladyship had become chargeable, to proceed in the usual way
against the Earl ot Mornington, for neglecting sod refusing
to maintain his wife. Her ladyship had, it appeared,
applied for relief, as Rascal pauper, to th. parish, and, having
been relieved, her deposition was taken according to the
customary form. The deposition was to the effect " that
she, Helena, Countess of Mornington, had been lawfully
married in 1828, in Hertfordshire, to William Pole
Tylney Long Wellesley, the present Earl of Moe.
rungton ; that she had applied for assistance to her hus-
band ; that she bad been refused any kind of support ;
and that she was, at present, entirely destitute of
any means of ordinary subaistence."—Mr. Thomas, the
priprietor of Ilatehett's-hotel, deposed that it was his
opiaioa that the statement of complete destitution
put forth by her ladyship was true Her ladyship, who
appeared to feel acutely her peculiar situation, was then
sworn to the truth of her statement. The warrant, which
ordered that the " body of the Earl of Mornington be forth-
with taken, and brought before the signing magistrate," was
then signed by Mr. Bonham, and the parties left the court.
MANSLAUGHTSIL—The HEM= BUJ fin war finally ex-
amined, charged with having caused the death of a man
named Bridges. The PM has been several times before the
public. The prisoner was fully committed for trial,
bail beinie_pnitively refused.
WOOLWICH.—Vtotasr ASSAULTS ST A SOLDIRIL—
CAarIea WDonalel, a private in the Royal Hone Artillery,
was chanted with violently assaulting a young lady, and
several other persona Mr. Lee, a clerk in the Admiralty,
was returning home from church on Sanday evening, with
his cousin a young lady, when the prisoner came running
through the ohnOyard at a tearful rate, and knocked the
young lady down with such force as to render her senseless.
Is biding that be did not stop to apologise, Mr. Lee and his
brother followed him and seized him bj the collar, when he
assaulted them both, and, with the asaistance of same more
soldiers, made his escape. He then burst open the door of a
house, in which he taught refuge. With the assistance of
Watts, a constable, the prisoner wastaken into custody. He
kicked so violently with his spurs as to endanger every per-
len around him. The clothes of Messrs. Lee were injured,
by his kicking, to the amount of 21. Mr. Traill ordered the
prisoner to pay a fine of 64., and in default committed him
for six weeks to Maidstone gaol.

Cents.. 58 to j ; the Fours, 881 to 9; from Amsterdam of the
26th they came lower. Russian, 110 to 111. Belgian Four-
andos-Half per Cents., 941 to 51.
The discount market remains without improvement, or
rather is may be said that the standard of money values has
been fixed at the higher rate current, as if it was calculated
that them could be no early probability of a change to more
moderate and favourable conditions. Some of the leading
discount firms gave notice this morning that they were pre-
pared to allow 44 per cent. on money lodged with them at
call, instead of 4 per cent- as before, and 6 per mat. in-
stead of 41 for money not to bus called in less than
fifteen days. From these high terms it is clear
that no immediate abatement of the rates charged
upon bills to be discsounted, that is to borrowers, is contem-
plated. When parties take in and pay for money at 6 per
mut., recallable at such short periods, they are not likely to
lend it out on three months or longer dated bills with a less
margin of profit than 3 or 4 per cent mere.
In this state of the bill or discount market the inquiry is
raised, why Exchequer Bills should be suffered to remain at
their present rate of interest, which has already brought
them to a discreditable discount. Although the Treasury,
having passed a contract with the holders, cannot be consi-
dered as justly liable to make good what has turned out to
be a hard and bad bargain, into which both .ides entered
with their eyes equally open, end with bona fides, any more
than in the reverse case it could be rightfully
entitled to call upon the holden to refund the
50.. premium, which in more prosperous circumstances the
bills sometimes command; yet in the interest and for the
reputation of the state, as sometimes a borrower of money,
and always an issuer of these bills, which is tantamount to
the contraction of a loan by passing them against essh, it
seems as inconvenient as inexpedient to remain indifferent
to their depreciation. The circumstance which should more
forcibly impress upon the Chancellor of the Exchequer the
necessity o: making some early and formal intimation of
what may be his intended mode of dealing with thim, is the
near approach of the period when he must declare the
usual notice of peeing off in money such holders as may not
be content to renew. Some eight or nine millions become
due in June, and the usual notice for calling them
in about the middle of May should appear before
the expiration of miny days. That notice will require the
holders to signify their option of taking money or renewing
the bills. It is entirely out of the question to suopme, in
the present state of affairs, that holders will be satisfied with
20. per day, or a fraction more than three per cent, per
annum, when Consols will at pavan.. prices yield about 31
per cent. ; and who knows whether before the Exchequer-
bills are one-hall matured whether they may not yield tour
per cent. ; whilst in the open market money may be placed
on unquestionable security at five per ant. and more. But
that which mug most weigh with the Exchequer is the pos-
sibility of paying off eight or nine millions of bills
in June, in hard cash as it were, for notes are
the equivalent. The Bank, it is evident, could lend
no helping hand in such an operation. The Chan-
cellor of the Exchequer should therefore take
warning by the misadventure of the last Exchequer bill re-
newal some months ago, when having advertised in the
ordinary way, as if dealing with ordinary times, that they
must be sent in marked to be paid off or renewed, he was
served with many unwelcome notices that the money would be
preferred rather than renew at the then comparatively mise-
rably low rate of interest ; which notices would not have
been served upon him had he at the same time agreed to that
elevation of the rate which subsequently he was compelled to
offer, but not early enough to reach banking and other
quarters in the country at a distance where such securities
are usually held in amounts. The impression in moneyed
circles now is, that unless the rate of interest on these bills
is raised, commencing in June next, to 3d. per day, or a
fraction more than 41 per rent. per annum, numbers of
holders will be induced to declare for money instead of bills
reaewed.

The deputation of bankers and merchants from Liverpool
are understood to bare bad interviews to-day with the Chan-
cellor of the Ex. hequer and Lord John Russell, if not with
Sir Robert Peel. It is said that from the Chancellor they
received no encouragement in their supposed application for
an extension of bank aocommodation, and the partial sus-
pension of the action of Peel's bill. From Lord John
Russell their reception is said to have been of a more kindly
disposition. From Sir Robert nothing of course could
be hoped.

Soak Ikea. ISO 1/0 IS 90 -----
1.410 Mods maoler 1 OM, 4
I pet Ca 144. oar, 041 I I Bask Segel 4.4 Are.. 111
3 par Cl. Cosa Aar., 44 4 4 0444414 tot Met.. 6416.11
Kew 14 per CI i..., 11 i i 1 per Ct. C0a501.,11.16. TI 416.
14 6666..... J5a.1,11106, I 16-1411 lk. BM. LI 4.. L.. 1
._.._ ..... ... .

I.Y. so*. ma a ' I Dime, tottO, 7 3
Dille bra. WPM. IS 1/010, Nate, / 1
POllllO7l FUNDS.
24 Peet. IMO& Bari 51e..72 3 we CO 11peeleh Boads,
I pea Peetzetee Ilerads, 34 e pee Cl. Veleta 1100.., Itlr ,
Ditto. Lem. 34 per, Cl.ra 1/stela ittlaaapt, 12
erre. lintels+ 1142,11122,411t.103 le tisfl..
Dino APO., WI 11,110 4 pee Orel. D 21211 Cert.. 114
0 Ore C. Sputa rmiw sia.. al

ear 6.coosse
PALMS' "*". it 11.7.7. 0pa1... 1111ebon. i Lemon. CM.:..
lor Coal, . Ti 7$ 19 To II 77 II 7/ 1/0
11110 1161$ $3 TI II
le T7e. . . • *4 • • •
6 Do. . I
_ . e e •
Delitan 1, INC 109 e • •
Do. I. 1643. • • • •
Do. 3 . • • • •
•
Ds. le. . • • • ^
1104664 Romeo . 197 se
• • .4
Domes Leas . 1 101$ . /4 .. •
Tiosoory BOW/ .. a • .1. .
Hoak Samoa . I WO
Mullane o Tosooloa (30 tam, 1; $3-
....
---

It•sars, Aram 13.-71•44. per 04•114, 111 144.7. 111 setaant ; 71••
per 04444.. 1111 44me7, 14 aceoast ; P• 441444, 411 414caty. s meeption ; 0444-
poma, , 84•4 0114. IaNWY. 174.—iscluaage as Ludas, 41 W.