The Express.
London, England, 1851-11-08 00:00:00

to teases the damafres to W. 34. &1., and the
notion(quest an
W 34
whether interest could he claimed upon ehe a o
ai.coeat for mewls sold wider ea. foli 0,1114 eir.umstanc
The plaislito were aria itivers and tokaiakem ki
ter, awl in 1161: the; vasiniessee.l sup; :ling the sick irlants
with tool, Ibe irivoices sent in contained a memorandum
that th. :mods err. supplied csin tto terms of cash on
• ry." Th • _amuse rrom 1 .<l uni....d for u Cflumtivr-
RM.. 10,, and thee the dispute arose whether the plaintiffs
Wald alai n interest.
TM swam without hearing the ewe at length, adobe
V of Mr. Jusase ,retainsll s that ".ere should
rule, and a rule nisi was granted accordingly.
in HZ AN AT;uILNEA.
Mr. Bramwell, (1 C., moved for a role nisi for an attiri
tent against en attorney our falsifying au alotract of Mal
mum .re wrkmeut, by making it appear that do
w▪
as entitled allsolutely to the payment of I,oolo'. on the
death of a re'etive, wheu in fact she bad a life interest in
that sum only. The supposed object of the falsification
was to cheat an untie. The name of toe attorney was ass
Sett med.
Itule nisi gran!cii.
%Ant r. WisnY—Fetoke GOODS.
The 1.1,111'11 in this case is ass:Knee of the goods d
Thomas Whittaker, who was eons icted at Cambridrlf
arson, and the defendant is an edfica of the town ofu
bridge. It appeared that the town of Cambridge
canes
by grant, all the goods of Vona coi.sicted there, and they
aeworilingly s• teed those of lemmas tt'hitekker. The plain.
tiff claim...l them under his assinitient, and cumnie,.ced the
present action of trorer to try his right. The cue was
beard belort Mr. Juaiee Crkswell st the last lluntiiiitdon
Amines, when the verdict was found for the plaintiff, leave
being given to the delenelant to move to enter a verdict fur I
himself.
Mr. reendelgott,Q.C.,now moved pursuant to this leave,
sad seentiencol the punt to be this. The record of the con-
viction stated it to have taken pl:teu on the cueunission do,
which statement, it appeared, was iu accordance with the
usual practice on drawing records. The fact was that it
did not tale place until some deys after then, the assign
MIA having been executed between the commi,aion do
and tt.e actual day of trial. The defendant's case sees that
the statement of this time of consictiou in the record must
be taken as enneitonTe against the plaintiff, and that there
fore his nasnotn.:nr wAs invalid for having been executed
after conviction.—ltule granted.
Itreasratattos ArrEALS.

This morning tle following suttee w.ts issued:—Notice is
hereby given th tt the court has appointe.t the following
days for hearing appeals Mont decisions or revising hams-
kers, .burulay, the Itft ; Monehty, the 17th ; and Thurs-
day, the 211th Nov. ; on which days the court will pro.
mai to hum the upiteals in the order in which they arc
entered.
'I he appeals entered are the undermentioned
Ilarwich Iforough—" l'osuall r. Iltrod;' :tad " l'ownall
v. M0e...."
rstirewshury Borough—" Jarvis v. the TWA 11 Clerk of
Bhrewsbory.
Blackburn Lturongh—"Milnei v. tekhouse."
CAnslindr.• Burouah—" Baden v. Cooper."
Isle of Wfflat, 'Lytle polling district—" tihetblen Y. Butt."
War.icL•hire, Northern division—" Bealuish v. the
Or-rat-c. 01 the purish of Stole."
Northamptontsbire, Southern division " Burton v.
Brooks," awl 'Baton v. Blake and laltesn other,"
Ilirsisofa at Ism lams Went as. Jonick
C.1",41.1.1. a 10 • UMW:. Ira,.
LtI.:TIN ET* lII' THE COURT.

The nuinle•r or Cans., entered far trial at the first sittings
in term is 22, 6 of which were undefended, and those hav-
ing ken tried, the court proceeded to dispose of the cases
which were detesoled.
lleiciiehh v. Wool.l.E.—Tae New LAW ire EVIDENCIt.
I lie JO this case wan a job mister in trees.
street, 'I tdo nhamscoint.road, and the defendant was a
livery st rule keeper in ltunvcll•mews. 'file action was
brought to recover 46f. le, the balance of an account re-
feting W transactions between the parties in the way of their
trade.
In the course of the coc the plaintiff was called, and he
produced his boot, to show Chit thi,• claim wan :V true one.
In answer to thin, however, the defendant wan put into
the hos, awl denied, on oath, must of the btrttroutztri of
the Omuta.
Mr. Jue„ice Crewiwell summed up the COW,
And lh.• jury immediately found a verdict for the plain-
tiff Mr the amount churned.
Ills Lordship then Vint that this war the first case which
he had bad outosiou to try bitter the pot-ing of the new art
relating to ewitleno. A. far as the pleinta war concerned
it had worked exceedingly well, but the tirrviliblia had
Murk a most disgraceful exhibition of himself, anti he was
sure that, in ord. r b, nuke the it work urn, it would
Ire ut ry•wary to Make some lorni,olll lilt the payment of the
tayetirow of prosecutions for la•qury.