The Express.
London, England, 1848-06-13 00:00:00

BAIL COURT.
Sittings In Ranee, before Mr. Jaetite Wiebtmen.
Qushit o. inns Atilt linuolin.—APßACLT.
lit this QM Mr. Phillimorehail obtained anal* nisi, which
ws puler V. ntly mad, absolute, to entreat the rive gniennece
of the defilidenta, and to quash a writ of mot watch they
hod sued out for the purpose of suAling aside a convicion iu
'..
a case of assault which was tried at the lot assizes for the
county of Oaterd, upon whi.whichoccasion they. had been both
Mund treaty, anti eentenZl'd to thr• joisonternt.
The ground on which the rule had he, n made absolute was
that the defendants lied nevi, taken any steps to prosecute
their writ of error. Subsequently Mr. Hunifrey, (.4.c., on
behalf of Henry Brume, uteeined a rule nisi to set aside
Mr. Phillimore's ru'e so tar as rester,d, d Henry
Broome, b couse he had not been able to show cause
ad.,,nst that rule, and that the attorm ye who instructed Mr.
I'hillim•rr, M. owe. Rickards and Waikt r, appeared only ler
be delentlaot John Broome • hence the II rvice of the rule
upon them wenn! not Oh ct li. cry Broome —Mr. Millimeter
cow lowered cause against the rule, mid comerdcd that it
was clear the same a•turn. 3s wi re employed fir hetet parties,
and that view of the nutter was supported by the tact of
Nlessts. Itickarsis and Walker having written to the attorney
for the pies. eirion and 'Token 01 both the alefendents as
their 'linen'', in support of the rule, sub-
mitted that the d. finelatit Dry Broome heel never
bre.. served with the role, and a service upon
Moors Welter& tend Walker would only be good as regarded
John llso , inasmuch as the attorney for Henry Broome
was a Mr. Newton.—Mr. Justice Wialvman mod he thoulat
the units: it the rule nisi upon the itefe d 11-11 flt Henry grooms
weep not wood, and therefore this rule which sought to set
spite the rut, anulute, which Mr. Phillimore Lad
obtained, must he made absolute.—A long argument then
engird as to the question if ova, but his Lordship gave no
111'64011 on the p ,ant.—Mr. Butt, Q C., n I.eltalt of John
1111,0111.., emptied to the court that, as the writ of error was
still in zi,ence as far re Henry Broome we, tencerned,
client n.l.4ht be allowed to assign error. He apprehended
that oho n two defendants sued out a writ of err r, end one
wee allow, el to pror test mh it, the other was • ntitled to do
so tai —Mr. Justice Woghtuteu said he would make nu utilet
eleint the other defendeutt.
- • • • •

PANTY. WALKEN. MANPAMMI. Mr. Archbold
nursed for a writ of mai damns to tu• directi d to the pier-
diens of the Tt tibury U. but, in Wore. ster comm..nd.
log them to pay to a single lady, of the nano, of Walker,
hhr tutu of AWL Some nuttier • Miss Walker, at the soli-
citation of her brotlit r, who wa* one of the guardians of the
Thin U..ion, advanced to the guardians the ►um of 3001.
towards building a workhouse. During the time her bre-
toer continued a guardian stie received regularly the interest
id her mon. y, but tn. Ills ce sine to hold that utlico she ap-
plied fur the pay went of the :1001., and she was then is-
ho med that 1/.4..2d , minus 8411. for income tax, was due to
her as ii.t. t, at.l that 301. was all of the principal sum which
remained undtscharg. d, tt e rest having b. en paid to her
brother. lie I. cruet c .unsel stated that he was instructed
to say, a xl Miss Walker had made an affidavit of the tact,
that she never authorised her brotoer to receive sty of the
principal sum on her account, and therefore the guardians
wets eland to pay her the amount she claiwed.-I•hc Court
granted the application.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.
Mttifl4 at Nisi r. iss, is tvcsi at WestriaNter.—Baure Baron Parke

sad • teem. jury,
DENT V. JACBJOIt.—LIYrnt %TAIGA DEALINGS —This
eine, which era upitd the attention of the court fur two
entire d.yn, was concluded yes.. relay.—Mr Crowder, with
whom wen Mr. M. Smith, .toted the ease for the plaintiff-, a
livery-stable keener in the neightionrh aul of Portman.
square, who keeps a linentlrspe.'s shop in that
n. ightiourhood. Tile action won brought to reeiver
rota the defendant, the London agent of Messrs.'
Stevens and Co., the ale Wiener,. of Leasetshire, the
morn of 271. 10n. 6.1., incurred with r the following circum-
stance.. The date, slant harlot opened a beer-shop adjacent
to the plaintills ntalile. in July, 1811, was introduced to the
'atter, sad placed a hornet at timiry in his where it
remained until the middle of August, for which a charge
of 4/. 7a. wan made. The defeialant totteref. iro requested
the plaintiff to sell the Anise, which he did, and for which
he (the prtintill) rectie. d 171. The plaintiff charged
2.. 61. cc ciimmissinn on the transaction. On the sale of
this Mime the defendant hired another from the plaintiff,
and ultimately j urcha ed it for the sum et 351. At the
clone of the transaction a balance of 271. 10s. 6.1. remained
due to the plaintiff, which the defendant having refused
to pay, the pr. sent action was brought, Mr. Watson (with
si has was Mr. Bramwell), for the de:cnce, entleavo.ind
to sk iw that the defendant Jackson throughout these trans-
actions was only the agent of Mews Stevens and Co.—The
jury returned a verdict for On plaintiff liir
El. vest C.kllFel remain on the paper to ha heard at the
present sittings.

High-street, Blow.,bury, oth Jove. le 1 hove just when
eatilerly to lord J. Hewett :he knees me.
Mr. Brodcrip observed that the letter mentioned that
the writer " should go again liref--re the police court," tend in-
quired whether defendant had been before charged with any
offence.—Baron Hugel replied that defes.dant had been
taken to Marlhi rough-street police -cart
ofyoerr.mb.euaakrein_g
tM
trier, rilipwinino:lttire""d w4thebthin Nitre in
er the rein e felt that the dere nil.
ant's anno)auce was of such a character as to induce him to
claim the protection of the law I—Baron Hugel repli. d that
the Prim e considered that it was tefeudant's object to annoy
him by endeavouring to evert money. The prince had
thrown himself woo the hospitality of this country, that I.e
might be iirooleyti:d and quiet, and thought V.at English
laws would protect him from such an annoyance.—
The deltoid enc. who app' ared to labour under considerable
excitement, said that the Baron and ho were not strangers
to each other. They had brealtfeeted, dined tog, ther, and
the 13 iron had often shiski is hands with hite,ettmelimer with
both Idide. lie lad known tile Baron more than Ire year.
110 felt surprintid that the present proccedir go should have
been taken tensing him, and Clnaplaine,l of the solitary
pcisonment he had had since he was taken into etocody on
Saturday evening. After a pause, defendant *a "It is
nut my province to say the injury the prince has done my
country. I certainly wrote the letter to the idiom I wanted
him .o give me a little money to get back to Austria.
I have been deprived of some property I had in
Austria through the prince. I ask you whether lam likely
to injure any wee by the contimts of that letter, which wan
seat opt.o and by post ? Is it likely a mail would injure
another who says in hie letter " 0 d forgive you as I do " ?
—Mr. Brod. rip: If yin have any claim on Austri t, that is
beside the pre. nt question ; you must seek your remedy In
another way. It will not ustifv you in writing a letter of
this description. Defendant : Doe§ your w raliip think
it is threatening to soy " God forgive you, as Ido "? Is it
Ik. ly the man who wrote so would injure another ? If you
receive my word of hohour,l will not go near the prince again,
In reply to a qui stion from Mr Broderip, Bitron Hugel said
that ene his oath Ii apprehended the prince went in danger
of annoyance from the defendant.—Defendant, who pro-
duced a medical ce rtifieate to show that lie wu in a very in-
dal rent state of health, entreated the Baron to accept his
solemn word that be would not annoy the Prieto again by
writing, going to his house, or by any nth• r act; and the
Baron heviiig censented to accept his promise to Viet effect,
Mr Broth Ili, observed that had the Baron prayed the judg-
ment of the court upon defend int he should have felt bouted
to have come to such a decision as would have protected the
Prince. lie (the worthy magistrate) would suspend the
warrant for two months ; and if it were found necessary to
ag .in put ie in force agee.ust defendant, lie might depend upon
it he would find himself effectually restrained by law from
repealing the annoyance.
SOUTH HARK.—Am same Mnienzit.—Mary Doyle, a
middle aind Irish woman, was brought before Mr. Cutting-
ham, chain.) on suspicion with having thrown a child over
London-bridge into the river.—R. Hicks, a letter carrier,
stated that on Saturday night last, about 10 o'clock, as he
was passing over Lonelonybriige, his attention was arrested
an observing the prisoner standing up on a seat in one of the
alcoves. She looked aosiously rich and left, and when she
thought that she was nut perceived, be saw her throw a
bundle over the parapet into the river. She then got off the
seat, and, as he emir-itched, when she caught a g impoe of
him, she attemptei to mike her recipe by runtiitig away,
hut he pursued her, and gave her into cuatady. A
boy coming up at the time said that it was a
child the prisoner had thrown over into the river,
adding, that he (the 1,0 y) had seen the child in her arms
previously to her hosing Hung it over the bridge. Two
other witnevee who happened to be paining over the bridge
at the same time, c ottirnted the letter carriee* statemi :it,
and added, that in throwing the bundle, or whateve r it was,
over the parapet int:, the river, the prisorer was compelled
to use both her hands in toe operation.—Policeman 178 Id
stated that when the pisciner was given into his custody she
said that the parties were mistaken in supplYing it to he a
child that she had ma le away with ; and added, that whit.
the y saw hi r throw one r into the river was a bag containing
some dirty old linen and old shoes which were valueless, arid
which she was ashamed for anybody to see.—The prisoner
was remanded, that blether evidence might be adduced.

1123 i 314
I lb.

ei
1. ad
7: OA.
6 :,4,1
ill Rd',
4i
13 :Id.