The Express.
London, England, 1849-06-18 00:00:00

Mr. Trevelyan, but the court had no further
denteevidce of this
than that area by Jess Rochester, who
Faumett did set admit or deny it. Thh antra on the
sky posiessiy to their gain', and soon after the witness
hit the sereko, when Mr:Fauseett took Mn. Fas mett to her
meshes', (Lady Trevelyan) at Wallington, ia the meaty of
Northumberland, after which Mr. Farm went with his
*Wren to his father's at Oxford. There appeared no date
at which they could ',tidbit the first root of adultery, and
there was no proof that Mr. and Mrs. Fatima did not so-
habit together up to the middle of Sereseher, at the house
al her brother. He (Dr. Ludington) thought the lib 1 was
set insistent with the *ideate; there was no direct proof
when esitabitation had erased.
Dr. Faintness remarked, that when they were at York
they ware separated, vii , es the 6th of August, 1848.
The Judge replied, that the court had not sufficient eel.
dines of this fast. There was so evidence of their entire
separation. Tura we a letter addressed by Mrs. Helena
Faussett to Min Fawatt, the sister of Mr. Pittman, from the
hones of Lady Trevelyas, dated Wallingtoo, in which she
szpressed bee foollor, and it was to the f lowing area :
Waffinetre, hod April.
Islv Datum:. Sentst,—l knew magnesia, at hi that et me to write
some& to rq be it Is the entsennesistion I have, them I no per-
LIS kw ms toepeak to, kw I mast sit bean pew mina with my
adairiaa. Spam and Warta —cars Isiah end Arthur,
I Me gem to say, le ahead Mph tea ssew ; he was
very sorry not tome ftpestelias sod I wee anginfuld ler his
sadden espistere, and iirra hoe sem se heati he Nell bare
stayed • Sew days lap& lig 11111mdas Iwe feel mos has ever, I
fir the lest few dope I Mee leer In a whirl, I e met I
=aieverything has same wpm mane soddenly. On
m children weals& aelliosinad, I wasbeland=
too; on Monday night I wee shoe, al more alone I hi swea
lama Imbue the soya d lair sweet Ideas. Hume sithhg are
to lasers sr, at the pmfament is Wee; they, der praises
=ll=agoisgrage pat
.s uaradmihryyssellgotss. II:dlte b
oa
thiaminb me so of Thos. Z ems cep early this morning, and I
wand dam tp Meng helm Isealast ; bow my children would
have elm 111 (OM ths ibeen. Do pray when you write
tell mg what imp do at he alliest boors, that I may be able to
fame dm min dhtlactly, saga me If they an love me, and PII
miff hie ere iedhs happy ad ashinted ; pray take ears of dearest
Emy. end do net let her get arta ; kiss them for me. flank
Bryan much teeth km nee to msalkolng our sad journey. Mamma
la very Wad, bet I would wear be in a dirty lodging and a
dull town; beams Mee I Seel everything is too good kr me.
1 am surrounded ell entry luxury and every comtort, and what do
I deserve? SAW. I hips Bryan will have a good journey. To-
night be al sailhas bare their little arms round his neck,
an -I kiss their ps Misr has. 1 hope they will like the things
is
I scut them; Nees say thyme Be you to read the hook to them.
Bobo owe sit in your lap, as her ha by you working at her stool.
Friday—This day week we left amellehrt. Oh ! Susan, every moment
I Meg more and more to ewe MI her my children ; if I lose all hope
of seeing them Inman just h-5k ism, all latticed for everything is
gone from me. I try to be to deferral as I eau before monies, but it
is such • blessing to be alone. (h bovine tried to perowle me to go
to Edinbre today with Arthur, but I remembered Br) an's advice, and
raid I Anted stay herr. It is halt-pet 10. I fancy my darling children
are running about in the rodeo, and bow I wl-li I was watching
them. Ob, write to me and tell me a them, or I hell must, I ska
—ch, I don't know what I shall sot do. Dearest Susan. pray for me.
Will you phone tell tiepin, that from some allu-ions which be made
the other day, I am quite positive a great many untruths have been
told about me. and I do not think that anything Rochester may have
raid ouch to be believed, as I am equally positive she could never
have either seen or beard anything which was not proper. I wish
now I hid asked Bryan what she did say, but really, true or untrue,
I could not bear to hear all the things. Somehow or other, I cannot
help reeling, that If It had been so ordered, that we should
have not now bean wtad, we should have gone on much more
bsppl.y than we have -ever done before. I had so &tenni eedto do
what was Mght, and to be wee amiable, and Bryan was
so kind to me in Frankfort. that I felt I could have done
anything for him, and am we he would hove got to love
me whether he wished it or not. As it is, I care not what
becomes of me and feel as if I should never have energy enough for
anything again. Saturday. Bryan said be was end I should bud a
home here ; but, as I told him st the time, I did not think it right to
come here on account of the nervous state poor mamma gets into.
I sow find I was right, for, although she did not my an
at first, the is now beginning to be very much put about. When
to go to I know not. 1 would rather be more in the south,
se the letters are not so long coming here, and I have not a
creature to speak to .bout my own miseries, or to consult what to de;
and mamma may correctly any, that more c, nsideration ought to
have been shown for her. As far as I was concerned. Dr. F.iuseett
was welcome to send are sny where ; as, without my elsildrt it, reek
plea It a ike to me, and nothing but misery will be say pada ass
for ever. Yon most not think I ant meopl.ining, bash lei magi&
and misery would drive me mad; and oh, I do so wand say
children—my precious, darling, much-loved children. Oh, I ion so
dirappointol, fir I vied so bore for a letter to-night. Do pray, Bryan,
if you have any pity, let dearest Emy write to me. I hope the dar-
ling children will not go to the Holland,; (or however kind they may
have been to Bryan, they certainty acted most bypocritcally towards
me. Oood bye, aced God bie's you, and Bryan, and my precious chil-
dren. Ever your affectionate sister, 11. . Cl.
. The rose is for dear Emy."
Here waii a denial, end not a denial, of the truth of the
statements made against her. It was d fficult to be recon-
ciled to the whole of this letter. In looking at it, be (Dr.
Lushington) cored not say he had come to the conclusion
that it was a con' anion of criminality. The terms of the
letter were not sufficient to bring him to that c %elusion.
It was • c ,mbination of circumstances which acted upu
him. The contents of this It tter required great considera-
tion to knit an ulsimate coneusiou, hot he must say per as
it was cot en admission of guilt In May, 1847, she went to
Edinburgh, and on the 6th of July following she gave birth
to a child. Mr. Walter Trevelyan came there and remained
there some time, visi.ing Mrs. Fau•ett. Even after her
confinement he visited her every day. The Judge said
ha could not help expressing his astonishment that Mr. Ar-
thur and Mrs. Arthur Trevelyan should also occupy
apartments in the same house, for they were h r brother
and brother's wife, and it seemed as if it were an attempt to
conceal the visits. They took the lodgings for Mrs. Faussett,
and he spoke et his sister as the person who was to occupy
them. Mr. W. Trevelysn'e visits were frequent, and al
though Mr. and Mrs. A. Trevelyan occupied distinct apart-
ments from Mn. Faussett, they took their meals together as
one family. The witness (Mary Cumming) said a gentle-
man used to come frequently, hut she did not know who it
wee, except that he was called Mr. Walter. When he e. me
le the brae he always naked for Mrs. Trevelyan, and nut
Mrs. Foliate When he was introduced Mts. Fauesett
I would sometimes be prevent; if she were not Mrs. Tre-
velyan would go for her. Now, here were the parties living
on intimate terms wilt the very person who wee charged
with having committed the set of adultery. He (Dr. Lush-
instals) felt he would has been wanting in due diligence,
if he had let the ease pass without commenting upon
this conduct, end to show the parties such acts did not
escape the vigilant of the court. It wan actually giving en-
souragement to carrying on these acts of criminality, for Mr.
W. Trevelyan and Mrs. Faumett were often left aloae
together. There was no reason for disbelieving the witness,
thouth it might excite astonishment in the mind of the court.
Pdr.W. Tref,' lyan used to ask for Mrs. A. Travelyan, and then
go to the apartments of Mrs. Fasseett, where he remainei a
considerable time. At the a-me time the servant was sent
out of the way. This was as strong ablator, of intimacy as
there well could be. It did not pro's that adultery was
actually committed, but it must have its weight in a cats of
this kind, snd mat of necessity lead to the belief that cri-
minality had indirectly taken place some time or other,
I though it was darkened by the cloud of the conduct of
Mr. and Mrs. A. Trevelyan, and the court was surprised at
their not having been examined in this cause. It could mot
reject the evidence of the witnesses who spoke to these
filets, both Mary Cumming and Margaret Martin. The
Rev. John Alexander, of Edinburgh, said that in August
1847, an elderly lady, a perfect stranger to him, and whose
name he did not learn, came to the vestry on the tffind
August, and requL dad him to officiate at a baptism, which it
was proposed should take plus the following morning, when ,
a child was brought and christened Herbert Trevelyan Fent-
on ; and when he asked for the parents' names, the lady,
who was very much agitated, bursting into tears, said, " the
child you are about to-bathe is that of the sister of your parti-
cular friend, notter Trevelan ; but lam sorry to say that
bee husband is the father of the child." This statement was
net aide in the presence of Mrs. Fatusett, or within her
Marin. The Judge said this could not be noshed as evi-
dence, as it was only made by an agent, and although a peed
of agency, in a civil muse, each as purchasing goods, lettiag
of a house, de, might be binding, it was not so in a criml
aft, and therefore not so on the present occasion, and the
coat must reject the whole of it. Taking the whole of the
evidence. it admitted an act of adultery, but did not show at
what time or in what place • there were ample opportunities
to commit adultery, it the Parties were so disposed. Undue
familiarities had been proved to have taken place, and
taking all the bets together, he (Dr. Lushingtoo) had
come to the conclusion, that he was justified in pronouncing
for a manias, and if the east should go before the House
of Lords, Mr Pausal* would not regret that the court had
taken so much pins to refer to the meagre evidence that
had been brought biers it. If it had not done so, serious
prejudices might have been raised against it in another
plea, sad sexless impediments might have arisen in the
I
These Prowedihdt

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.-BATURDAL
Boom Ha, Comessonzi Commas. •
Ix is BOVILLS AND OF RUM-
PROPIIIIVIT "writ' FORTY TRAWL
This bankruptcy tool, plea in 1810, and applieation was
made by a person who said that he had been the means of
discovering peo=delonging to the estate, and that • divi-
dend had bees
Mr. Green, the official wiener said the applieeta had
give* iabrieatioa of some deeds which had been suppressed
ter Cossaideriible time, sad is emergnesses of the informa-
tion given he should be able to pays dividend nada the
estate.
The applicant said that the deeds had been in the posses-
sion of a third party for 23 years, and they had been im-
properly retained.
Eis Molnar referral to the act 6 Geo. IV., esp. 120, and
said that any person who voluntarily disclosed to one or
more of thepsees the azistenoe of property, atter the
time had ex for the disclosure by the bankrupt of his
estate stool be entitled to an allowance of 61. per ant. on
the amount of property acquired. He (hie Honour), how-
ever, could not make an order in the absence of the solicitor
to the fiat, and therefore the application mut be rammed at
the dividend meetiog.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT—SATeaDAY.
Booze lie Coicrastonza Parums.
In to TRONA, OAMN.—INPORTANT APPLICATION
AYYLL7ING COLOITT COURTS.
In this NM Si important question was raised. The ir sol-
oist wee heard We month before the County Court at Wit-
ten, MN liesauset, sad an application was now made for a
releazieg ea the ground of fraud. The question was whe-
ther there was any power to great a re-hearing, or whether,
since the baldness bad been transferred to the
County the power formerly exercised by this court
had bedew beperat4ve. It woe stated that if this must did
let bilierfire, there would be no remedy, as the county courts
bad se power to grant a rehearing.
Kr. Oahe, who made the application, said it was of great
impernmes, and the public policy was In ita favour. He
abed Mural standee, and pointed out various clauses In sup-
port cf his, view.
Xr. Commissioner Phillips said the question was a very
Important one. It was the opinion of the Court of Queen's
Bench that in old cases this court had the pow d it there
was no provision to meet new oases, he (Yr. Cdimiesiouer
!Mr) thought there should be mi set paned by the lees-