The Express.
London, England, 1851-06-20 00:00:00

Ms. N
Alderman SIDEY
that they would on no accounttake
market. The eosporation could 'Lei
peat from taking each a step. Tbl
einntittce when the house pia fill
pods". of the day. He novid, tho

igi:
at a

lead J. RUSSELL mid that oldie* Ile tharraa rr
anotheedr le:Mee!' ?IVA limy should
pea wide the
Mr. W. WILLIAMS ressitmended minsber (XL
AIL Slimy) sot to dbilatbalmme.: ---
STASIORD joined is the settentietilla don of the
has. amber for Lambeth.
Nr. Atiseara SIDNEY thought it was quite intern-
shard to theet,te be there legislatzei for the destruction of
sn cairns erelre. without seseig• site. Hem made
hisses l[ peesli=edeoquainuat wib tbs sabre, be on-
rZlib& that tree wee so site so canesiatt
te Awe tbe reakot
preent Mat "Cteastste=yuelltelarrig ardtaa.at
stir J. DUI* red as seassimet as the dense, to
dr glint that ttr its alma be grovel et by par-
lausint.
Sir U. GREY did set see how be eould adept the hon.
usember's suggestion. There was no way in tart the as-
sent ot pertisimat *nig bo given to an ageserast for the
purchase of I.
The amendment having been withdrawn, clause 3 was
aimed to.
Clauses 4 and 5 ware dm agreed to.

SIMI 41,
Oa
Sir J. DUKE propose& an amendment, providing that
the bye-laws should 100 approved of by the judges.
After a few words from Mr. G. C. Lewis, the amendment
was naptived, and the clause agreed to, as were also
dna.7, 8, and 9.
On Muse 10,
Or
J. DUKE proposed, after' the word " opened," in
plee 4, line 49, to knee out the reasainder of the clause.
The object of the amendment was to provide that, while
the public might enjoy the advantages of as many new
markide as might be erected, the ancient market should not
it up.
D. C. LEWIS said the adoption of the amendment
entirely defeat the purpose of the bill.
Alderman SIDNEY mid that if his hon. friend (Sir
B Duke) did not divide the committee on the question
reteuuon of Smithfield market he intended to pro-
hat in page 5, beginning at the words " no new =f-
ees, the remainder of the clause bo left out, the object of
the amendment being to admit of the erection of new mar-
kets where they were thought desirable.
The CHAIRMAN asked if Sir James Duke withdrew
his arsendrneut
Sir J. DUKE said he intended to take the sense of the
house on it.
After some discussion, the committee divided. The num-
bers were,
For the amendment 2l
Against it
Mr. Alderman SIDNEY then moved to leave out th
rest of the clause from the word "markets," in the fifth
line; the effect of the amendment being to allow other
markets to be held. The committee divided:
For the amendment. 2O
Against it 47-27
Mr. A. STAFFORD said there were good sites at the
south side of the river not two miles from St. Paul's, and
he wished to know what objection there was to putting in
the figure 3 or 5, instead of the figure 7.
Mr. CARDWELL said his answer was that they had
copied the words of the original charter. Whatever might
he said now, he was confident that eventually the City
would take the management of the market, and they did
not wish to deprive the City of its privileges.
Atter a few words from Mr. Mackinnon, Mr. C. Lewis,
anti Mr. W. Williams,
Mr. A. STAFFORD moved that the figure " 3 " be in-
serted in the clause instead of " 7."
After a few words from Captain PECHELL,
Sir J. DUKE must my the City of London had not been
fairly treated in this question. Notwithstanding the pub-
lic declaration he made in that house, they were made to
appear as if they wished to interfere with the inhabitants
ou the youth side of the river, by striving to preserve a
monopoly. What he complained of was, that the govern-
ment wished the public to believe that the City of London
was wishful to preserve the distance.
Mr. MACKINNON remarked that, if they got rid of
Smithfield-market, they must get a better ; and it was on
that around that they ought to establish one market.
The committee then divided;
For the amendment
Against it 46-28
The clause was then agreed to.
Clauses 11 to El were teemed to without observations.
On clause 16,
Sir J. DUKE observed that, in the event of the City un-
dertaking the management of the market, there ought to be
• provision that the tells should be paid into the treasury of
the City of London.
Mr. C. LEWIS said there were various modifications that
might be made in the bill if the government could receive
• positive assurance that the City would undertake the
management of the market.
Mr. CARDW ELL said they could introduce words to the
etl et suggests it by the hon. baronet in the 38th clause.
Clauses 16 to 2.5 were then agreed to.
On Clause 26, which incorporated the Lands Clauses
Consolidation Act into this Art,
Mr. W. WILLIAMS said the amounts ought to be
audited, whether the City was to receive the tolls or the

Mr. CARDWELL observed that if the City provided a
now market and found the money they would be in pre-
cisely the Santo position with regard to it as they stood in
now. They did not propose to send the accounts to Somer-
set-house to be audited, if, instead of its being public
money, it was corporate money.
The clause was agreed to, as were also the remaining
clauses up to 37.

On clause 38,
Sir G. GREY said, on the consideration of the report,
he would wove an unterolment to this clause.

...The remaining clauses were then peed to, and it was
agreed that the schedule should be printed with the bill, on
the understanding that alttrutions might be made in it on
the bringing up of the report.
The Chairman then reported progress, and
The house, at ten minutia to four o'clock, adjourned
until an.
The house resumed at six o'clock.
SMITHFIELD MARKET REMOVAL BILL.

Mr. BERNAL brought up the report on this bill.
SELECT COMMITTEES.
Mr. EWART postponed his motion for the reduction
of select committees to seven members to a future day.
MILLING INTERESTS.—IRELAND.
Lord NAAS postponed his motion in reference to the
Irish milling interests to Tuesday, July 13.
BORNEO.
Mr. lIUME gave notice that on Thureday, July 16, he
would bring forward his motion in reference to Borneo,
which had been postponed a few nights since.
TRANSPORTATION.
Mr. AN STEP begged to postpone to the 15th July the
moti n which had been set down for Monday next, in re-
ference to the subject of transportation.
ACCIDENTS BY STEAM-VESSELS AND

"gel iWrvi.j

........ .....,..
Lord NAAS said that as several of the late accidents to
travellers and workmen had been manifestly caused byne-
Blest and carelessness, he wished to ask the Hight Hon.
President of the Board of Trade whether it was the inten•
tion of the government to propose any measure during the
present session for the more efficient protection of persons
travelling by steam-remelt or railways, or of those employed
in working steam machinery ?
Mr. LABOUCILERE said the question put by the noble
lord related to three different subjects. The noble lord
inquired if it was the intention of ministers to introduce
any measure fir the purpose of affording protection and
security with reference to steam-vessels and steam machi-
nery employed in factories, as also in reference to railways.
Now, with regard to steam-vessels, it was his (Mr. Labou-
ebere'id opinion that the law was in a very defective state.
In consequence he had introduced a bill, which had been
read a veered time, and which, he hoped, would receive the
sanction of that house, as thereby the law would be placed
in a more efficient state us regarded steam ma-
ehinery on hoard vessels. With regard to the se-
' einul..part of the question, the machinery employed in
fecieries, be was not prepared to introduce in the present
session any measure conferring on the government more
power a the supervision of machinery used in factories than
they at present possessed, However, the matter would
receive his consideration ' • but for the present be wee not
prepared to go further. I,ostly, as to whether it was the
intention of the government, in any way, to take into their
hands increased power of supervision with a view to pro-
tecting the public against railway aWdmiM he wad assure
the noble lord that the subject hadaesiad Ms cwt anxious
and 'titmice consideration. He ha sow to the opeetasion
that any meanly of
t.=
4=isa or opplkation
that might be lot the
of directors would be isionded wish srica lea inn
As regarded security*, possia= be hod essidolly con.-
sidered the various that had',
bee made ; but ho i1Zr.4464114 rogiCratitush poen] I
sad unieenal appidalisa asoserer. Thorabre, be should 1
=to giving my dapansoll of the parairat that 1
they swahl ass exercise propady, but whhh the !
dbostarosooM, awe„
I. tho supseisse of the deals
c't=', r.. 46„„ I. i after on, as soeurity of the public :
de is the pasta mita, he was not
prepaid to inta
re kes a bill to karma Oho lowa otiovern
Sir D. NORRIFF-
meat ks this osal_S to ihrbthris aillitt.
sell the othation of the
i eight hon. gentlialma to report la* ads by Captain
Leans on the salkiest of railway assidento end wished to '
know if prostalissof the directing her , in ease
of apsidint, =Win* be resorted to t . I
Mr. LABOR moiled dal the tam *which that
referred hod bola nods the, of a soraner's in • '
awl a sadist of astommd against '
Therohae 14 opal lairamasi that after
esmh the mossooma should holitals a prose
rissoldis
osila. Me hsliwad tam lagohas mat atioadsdi with
area bra Win atasitha to ths ossiewsks, and
the dilate to ardspt seam uss to pre-
tine rsonsasse of Meadaasoisna
WOODS AMR- FORESTS.
Lord DVNOAW vial& to knew hen this nab led the
Chief Otwasolesicaor of Wads and Forests, if it were his
intention to fix ea early day lee the diesusina of that outs-
tie* ?
Lord SEYMOUR replied that on Friday the bill would
be read pro, orma and that on the Tuesday following they
would take the discussion.

CROWN PROPERTY.
14. t. HMIS said it was his intention to take the opinion