The Express.
London, England, 1849-11-10 00:00:00

AT NOTTINGHAM.

COURTS-1

As stated in the Express of yesterday, the con-
firmation of the sentences of the first series of trials was re-
ceived in the course of Wednesday of ernoon, and at the
rising of the court (sitting on the ease of Private 8011, which
was net concluded) the whole of the monis in barracks were
called out, and formed into square in the Riding school, the
various orisonees, including those about to be sentenced,
being placed under guard in the centre.
Lieut.-Col. Arthur and Adjutant Robinson then read the
despatches revived through Earl Cathcart, colonel of the
regiment, which, in addition to recapitulating the evidence in
each ease, confirmed the various sentences passed by the
district courts se follows:
Private 781, John Turner, charged with breaking out of
barrack. on the 14th of October, when ere:fined thereto, and
with not returning until brought back in custody on the
evening of the same day. To be imprisoned and kept to hard
labour for three =lender months.
Private 787. Thomas Holmes, for breaking barracks on
same day, and not returning until the 16th, being then
drunk, To be imprisoned for 81 days and kept to hard
labour.
Private 785, Alfred John Ellis, for breaking out of bar-
reeke after having been previously warned for duty, and
further charged with a formerconviction for a similar offence.
--Guilt!, with the exception of that part of the charge as to
having been warned :or duty at the time of absenting him-
self.—To be imprisoned for 56 days with bard labour.
Private 916, Edward Smithson, for breaking out of
barracks whilst crinfinid thereto, on the 18th of October,
and nut return ag until next day, and for abeenting himself
when warned for &Py. To be imprisoned 3 lunar months
with hard labour.
Private 936, Robert Reuben William reuse, for break-
ing oat 01 barracks on the 16th of October, at a time
when he had been warned for they, and net returning until
' the 17th ; and also with afterwards breaking from a picket
to whom he had surrendered. To be imprisoned 66 days
with hard lshour.
Privete OA, Charles Peters, frombreakiag from barracks
on the 16th of October, after being warned for duty, and
not returning until the morning of the 17th; and also for
t soaping iron a party sent in search of him, to whom he had
surrendered on the 16th. A similar sentence to the fore.

oi
gng.
Private 610, John Whel, for breaking out of barracks and
not pawning until the 16th. Same sentence es in the two
preeeding cum.
On Thursday a despatch was received frost Barl Cathcart,
continuing the **mance on Scrgeant John Newman, for
neglect of duty on the 25th October, in suffering rivets
Moffatt to mope front luc custody. To be reduced to the
rank of a private dragoon.

Sir W. W. Wynn's hounds, Monday, Greeforn ; Wednes-
day, Slab, ; Friday, Acton Reynold; Saturday, Buchan%
Station—half.paet 10.
Mr. Farquhanoa's hounds, Monday, Bradford Planta-
tion; Tauday, Carus Park.
Mr. Lumley's hounds, Monday, Baniby Moor ; Tuesday,
Dinairigton ; Friday, Berlina Bar ; Saturday, Finniogley
Village—UP:past 10.
Redford's hounds Monday, Plessley Village ; Tuesday,
Thargurton; Saturday, Thcresby Park—half pest 10.
The Branham Moor bounds, Monday, Harewood Bridge;
Wednesday, Bram ; Friday, Deightem Bar; Saturday,
Hook Moor—quarter-past 10.
Lad Varbornugh's hounds, Monday, Weelsby liouse ;
Wednesday, flashy Mill ; Friday, Little Limb: v. Lodge-11.
Sir TattOri Sykea's hounds, Monday, Langton Wold ;
Wednesday, Castle Howard ; Friday, Hopkinton House—
half-past 10.
The liolderness hound', Monday, Buford ; Tuesday, Caul
Castle ; Friday, Kennel-11.
Lori Redusials'y hounds, Monday, Pomfret Castle; Wed-
nesday, Bradwell Grove ; Friday, Eyford ; Saturday, Blen-
heim—halfpast 10.
Mr. Giles's hounds, Monday, Duke of York, Barrow;
Friday, Wall Hills—half•past 10.
The Warwickshire hounds, Monday, Wellesboume ;
Tuesday, Midford Bridge; Thursday, Duschurch ; Friday,
Upton House.
This Brighton harrier, Monday, Patcb am ; Friday,
Djke—quarter to 11.
The Brookside harriers, Monday, Newmarket Ilia; Fri-
day, Talscombe Tye.
'f he Cottesmar• hounds, Tuesday, Tilton Wood; Wed-
nesday, Casewick ; Friday, Hambleton ; Saturday, Saadi:
thorps-11.
The Crawley and Horsham hounds, Monday, Crawley
Village • Friday, West Grinstead—half-put 10.
Sir Henry Seale's hounds, Monday, Buller's Anne, Dean;
Friday, Marley.
The Worcestershire bounds, Tuesday, Harticbury ; Fri-
day, Brockeridte Common—half-past 10.
Her Majesty's stag hounds, Monday, Bodfoat ; Wednes-
day, New Lodge ; Friday, Hayes-11.
The E sec and Suffolk hounds, Tuesday, Gol Grove;
Friday. S ratford ilia.
The Essex Union hounds, Wednesday, Dambury Griffin;
Saturday, *Abington Wants—half-put 10.
The East Essex hounds, Tunday, Kelvedon Angel; Fri-
day, Wethersfield Town.
The B. V. H. hounds. Tuesday, Sturmicster Common ;
Saturday, Pointington Ridge—halt-pas: 11.

Latin llnteliteence.
EQUITY COURTS.—YES.TERDAL
Barons TUB Vicie-CuAncEu.oaor ENOLV.P.

AMR-YU-GENERAL V. BROWN'S EObPITAL, STAMFORD.
-ADMINISTRATION OP CHARITY FUNDS.
.

---
This wss an information filed by the Anorney General,
at the relatiou of vrtain inhabitants of the town of Smarts-1,
fur the purpose of baying a new scheme direcs.d by the
court, for: the administration of tho funds of an hospital at
Stamford, f-,unded by William Brown, an inhabitant of
that tone, in the third year of the reign of Richard the
Third.
A reference to the Master to approve of tt scheme had been
arranged by the partite, with the eseeptien of 1.01.0 question.
which wee as to what visitant! powers were vested in the
Bishop cf L'ncoln, with reference to the alteration of the
rules and ordinances of the choity. This question having
been argued by counsel, the Vice-Chancellor reserved his
judgment.

Boon VI

Wieux.

...........
Tstn MILTAIJIE OF LONDONDERRY O. OVINOTOIC.—SDIT
FOR TITHES.
The bill wee tiled to establish the right of t' o plaintiff
to the tithes hedonging to the impropriate rectory of St.
Giles, of Kepier, rear Durham. The plaintiff claimed as
tenant for life under the settlement made on his marriage.
It appeered that the rectory and tithes had, prior to the
marriage, formed part of tho property of the marchioness,
whose title thereto was deduced through the family of the
Tempests. from a grant to Lord Cockburn of Omuta:,
made by King Edward I.
The Vice Chanceller said that, assuming the title of the
plaintiff to the rectory and tithes to be made out, yet ete the
di els were all inter putts and no instance had been proved
of the pernancy of tithe, he wee hound by the cases of
" Meeting v. Meade," and " Knight r. the Marquis of
Waterford," not to decide the case without a trial at
Law either by an action er an issue. The only question to
ugne, therefore, was, which of those modes of proceeding
should be adopted. The argument will be resumed SO-
IIIOTTOW.
—.—..—...