The Express.
London, England, 1848-07-22 00:00:00

od for himself h
oth.

KTINCL gad Mr.
W. was substituted
Y substituted toe
made in mend
which, in come-
ts oontained in tne

bill was committed
ted ; the chairman

!Ilor of the Uxche-
onideration of the

IEQUER said h.
On Monday,
gi•tn notice of a
W (S.aurday), with
ord without fail or
REL AND.

s iuetf into a cob_

to motion of which
0, ramiee to the
case of John
which had hewn
ation, was apses-
that criminal ‘eu
ie care against him,
Ireland were con..
when acting under
mode of selecting
and as in England,
w being the same,
lot be was prerared
led with the case of
L, from the original
in the box, there
mini,tration of jus.
e I geed to call the
In land the sheriff,
the sulking of the
n this country, and
names of those who
cued in a book called
It so happened that
trinr d 4,570 names.
ud 1,635 were pro.
e than two Roman
?re book. From that
riff to select such

be sufficien• to
e commission. In
electe.i 150 names,
sheriff personally,
ed that more than

protestants. There •
It this. By the act
lected the panel, was
as obliged to summon
ow th, trial of Mr.
tie jurors were sum-
and
when those sum-
it was found that they
etrialatall. Now iwu
I, and the inference,
rd b subs' itut ed
hich the ju sn or
t.,re
el's tri,.l, a eta ement
nich he was bound to
ttis country. It war
,e brother of the attar-
clerk, had tampered
a examined as to the
rere anything but sans-
'chef, it was regularly
the 13th, and that it
e sander-sheriff, in his
That gentleman said
s preparation occupied
are selected to inquire
or not. They decided
r stated that they were
respectability. Well,
: of the whole 150 on
iolics : that, in the tint
frith, and that all the
its. (Hear, hear.) But
:al, and that the sheriff's
would, however, state
arrangement could not
ged alphabetical. Then
loon. both resident is
e business, and being of
rotestant, the other was
taut Moore was 12th on
loon was placed No. 122.
:inducted in England?
notic d that a panel was
was t Ann to it, not as
s b log unusual. Lord
!sown, acquiesced in the •
it into a ballot box and
the conduct of the Irish
of Mr. Mitchel. Un-
no attempt to restore
2 and exemsing the right
onted, out of 71 juron
of whom eighteen were
the only Roman catholic'
t him otnene, in passing,
entre was a very arbitrary
Michael O'Loghlen, the
le (Mr. Keogh) was not
should be chosen, but he
sufficient reason why those
set aside.. He had made
I to ante that ten out of
:ted with political anode-
now came to the most
nue had been only one
d enough, but it bap- '
rue juries struck before
a alluding. Two were
ien and Meagher, and two
[Con, but that charge was
11. .elony was , btained. In
weave jurors struck off by
lice, all men of the highest
n con lected with any poli-
trast this with what had
al in 1811, a case which bad
. and right hon. gentlemen
Ilan ea-holies were struck
Dut of those, eight were sa-
int Association, the ninth
e monster meeting at Tars,
hnut knowledge of his
gal number. number. (Hear, hear.)
he noble lord at the head of
at the se matters in the same
1814. (Hear, hear.) in
aid, that the conduct of the
ten Roman catholic; was
eediega of all moral weight
n a motion was then made
ble lord paired in favour of
to case or the justification.
a in his place ? (Hear, hear.)
to propose his third coercion
era.) He would again be in
11, although when two years
tred that he me-ely occupied
and yet when the subject
rent insult to the catholic
not deemed of sufficient
le lord. (Hear, bear.) The
7 tor the home department
cession in concurrence with
at was not all. Various mem-
, in 1814, expressed strong
he striking of Mr O'Connell's
lours' di-lay, a meeting was
ain't the conduct of the this
the PACMOIIt names to the
resent Master of the Mint and
(Cheers.) There was also the
e present undersecretary for
that his right hon. friend the
• cor.nexion. (Cheers and
red member quoted the speech
for Dungarvaii, on the occasion
le to memorialis, the eueen and
nut what the speaker styled the
conduct of the government.
to the Board of Control, tan
be Paid is England if persons
see of their religious opinions ?
lington, the Roman catholic se-
hat it would be quite unworthy
Ling it a matter of faith—(hear,
nine ministers were adopting
A the crown our safety to the
was yet another name he must
lan who was present at the same
ey-General for Ireland. (Heal
forward by Lord Norrnanby in
ing the conduct of the govern-
t in striking Roman catholica
, and a protest on five points
Innis of the house against
I name to that protest, and
Clarendon." (Chem.) But he
rf more urgent than tee conduit
nt government when in oppra-
ns. Was there nothing in the
to warn the bowie against induce
elief in the minds of the p?ePle
of England bad been given to
a boon, not as a law to be
fairs to to but as a means of
awn of obtaining verdicts by
.ar, hear)—to prevent men
s from being tred (silly .1
t, and to enable the re._
g against partisanship
a choose a jury of men whose
adverse to him ? This was the
to the jury which tried Mr.
t the object 2,s to have men of
Why, he had looked at the list
risoner was tried, and found th at
okrupt or insolvent within a few
.here were men rdected
who for
were
their
while other men,
alth and respectability, Wl*
ed
gentlemen opposite had obtain
that they would never consent
for Ireland, unless socotsgasiet
medial measures. (near.)
lave been in 1846 for pintrgliA6