The Express.
London, England, 1849-09-29 00:00:00

FRANCE.

PARIS, FAIDAT, 5 30 rag.
Yesterday the edict and amnesty of the Pair was
the topic of every conversation; to-day, it is the
subject of every newspaper.
" We did not wank" says the National," the pro-
clamation of the Pope to show us that three can be
no settlement between contending dogmas, that there
is no possible conciliation between two radically
wont* terms—namely theocratic and popular *eve-
'witty Pins IL, in favour of whom the expedition
was planned, has just tried and condemned it by his
sniffs's. The Papal crozier has sharply castigated
that unjust and undignified policy which, a ter attack-
ing the liberties of Rome, thought to attenuate its
casket by vain-glorious boasting. We say, and this
troth must be deeply impressed on the masses, that
the Pope, as Pope, did but what he should by riveting
anew that chain which had been so nobly broken by
the patriots of the Lanai City."
Mare can be so compromise, thinks the National,
between a part or the whole of the Pope's temporal
power. He must have all or none. The fault of the
French government was to think that he would be
Went with a little. He desires the whole, and will
net yield farther. Ia this the National and the re-
publican may be wrong. France cannot be satisfied
with so little. Two of the pants of the presidential
litter are no: touched at all—namely, secular admi-
situation and liberal government. As for the third
—a general amnesty—We act qualified as each does
sot deserve the Lame. It te evident, from the
teas even of the Coestitutionnei, that mat ere cannot
tort u they are. If hopes were entertained before
the manifesto of the Pops was known, that it might
be emisidered sufficient, they are gone now that it has
=. The Con•litutionsel says : "We dz net
edict which has just been published at Rome
as satisfactery in all its parts. We are in it neither
a tlll4 of rupture nor a motive for satisfaction; but
ally a step towards an agreement." That evidently
is how it mast be taken; the good part—municipal
irat.tutions and judicial reforms—as in Instalment
ally of what is dee and must be granted. The re-
pabfean and democra'ic organs, however, do not
thick that more cot cessions can be wrong from the
Pope; but the Debate, which considers the edict as a
"deteptiost," expects something more. It says :
la the Aeons propio of the holy father there are ter)
Me le he denismitelsed ; that which coseeras the Malta-
Um, sad that which relates to the amnesty. Oa the Ant
peat we terregret that the relents wombed do not that
▪ a Mus arable of more immediate realisation nut
lb" w rarroanded with reatrieticom and reserves which
ajar te pompom" their esesation to an butellaita period.
Its, however, a pram oa which it i. impowiblo not to leave
s vide knits& to the initiative of the government. The
lifitatiem is themselves will have more or lass truth or
oomenty amain, to the mo who are charged to put them
:remise. Were the Pope to grant sera more extensive
awe liberal reforms Asp wield stall depend on the
Cior bed intlinatinn of ate saMionadoe. The eliseise-
d the Rama fives must be taken as it is. There has
taw him a mortioa et dentandimc of the Pope the estn
mimes eta eenstitudneal mamma. ouch 11 is nod"'
OM is smatriss where there is a well defined separation
litmus the spiritual and the temporal power. Institutions
dues kind as alwelutely aeoapetible with the ..In
tut" of the prattled power; to demand thew, would
Mis ask dila Peps the ennitdlinta of his own wor and
.IhrseM be se se wto have gene to Itit• ill*
mow% eeseeney in thie natter to rely more on the Jewe-
ler sad so the gamut et the sovereign pontiff, mod on
IS rbsies ef his government, then on written statutes. As
**mem, es regards the aansety, we cannot help ob-
liging *et the heath goverunenet is still ailed on, en this
Vot, to slimes veresentatkas to the nowt of Wine.
i.... 76111.116 dal IMMO which we always wish to observe,
e pain whisk ore aunt dieseabie, the pretended
*boat hes easy appraises el being • derision. The en-
Illfirs is mesh sere viand than the rale ; with the este-
▪ vash as istreihred Into it, we do sot mse what
iseli mask neaps frees ezeapinno, WIT/ el" ,
led
giertleveTy nee. Frame has. by WS *Valid= to
awe thee illatereetsa took. We
112_ .ININP":=18 Nolo sundops peanmees for the tri-
'woos sad the Presoak geweaMt bee die right to de*
new that it Mould not le wade ea intlientent of ven-
lamse sot allowable to from gas Pops of 1849
h"▪ '
aw"" POP. a 18461 We meld wish ler a other abi-

Piss IX. has just made a oonceinion to liberal
malt" says the Potrio—" a trifling and insignificant
it is tem, but still it is a oonosesioo. We must,
4not despair of the future. Let us hope that
1 y father will know bow to complete the work
liaiPit he commenced amidst the applause of all the
hinds of progress and of wigs liberty."
The Prow iodignant, and justly so, at la ain"
h which reprieves no one:—" For the sales of the
°NY rather, we would rather have seen him refuse an
altogether, than grant oas which, from

Par Assouat.
PALM Sam IL For
Mosey. leesst.
I-- 177-------_____ Daly.
....._
11 par asta b 6 13 36 0 66 13 65 93 66 15
3 par Owls. l9 10 16 90 69 IS SS 90 84 10
3 do. Noncom „
44jer Cast/ -
4 Ter 08E64 NI to ,
bebop cm larks : SO 41:1;•. 33 II; la asp. SS 33.
13sta.1, IMO ....„
971. Maa" liss6;4. 5l Ilcoey
I, INS
Do. 41
Da 9
Baciss.—Paris sad" (NUL... 745 • Pads sad lama. 1.110 ;
lama IN vrai:zi;n=sal ilors=o.; lassabourg
sal 1616. 3; ). WI 75; 410; North,
OS 71; Mali sad Oasabsw& 631 111; Town sal 14sa1sts, 191 60;
Mcislsrasa sad Timm, 115 ; Duras= sad TIN*, 66.