The Express.
London, England, 1865-05-27 00:00:00

Mead Oa essay Egag-bang, here we are again," for sa
ohpatioaabbe sham. Atterwards the soag was gemeraUy
looses fry the este* a "'
Other widows wee evils= east that the " Has.
" bad bass meg ia America by Yet Poore troupe,
with the °hones " Hero we are sepia, hare we are awls.
ill an sasinses day." sad that at Christ/am, 186 L, is
Ma platosioi• at the Barmy Theatre, the song was 'stre-
amed with a thorns similar to the plaistiffs
The *7, I. the emerge of the endorse, stopped the case,
raying that they had bused essush of
Yr Jostles Yearns sessussi ABA they bad ouislaly
bard 416010 of " Ellaptt"
Verdict for ties delea

COURT OF lIXORKQUIIIg.
fittings is Bran'—(Bliere Lord Cede Bares sad Barons
Mart* Bramwell, sad Chanssal.)
centaur 9. Dia OILLTOQUIL
The plaintiff had formerly beans fanner and an agent to •
brewer, and the defendant was abet do mein* of
the Duke of Wellington. The Crown tavern, in
Rapsranneet, Haymarket, eante Into the posses-
sisa of Use defendant, and being anxious to
dispose if It be offered to plaintiff, who was in the habit of
Bogginess the house, and who had proposed to get •
parobsser, 11. per amt oonsmission in the event at his Sod-
ing a palm who would agree to bay. The defendastseked
3,000 L for the tavern, but sold be wsokl take
less, and that the plaintiff should have the 11.
per sent. upon whatever It brought The plaintiff et.
introduced s pawn named Cuthbert, who eirend • oeutzsot so
to purchase at s certain prim and paid 601. deposit, bat
he was unable to raise the rest of the messy, and ultimately g
want to New Zealand. The plaintiff claimed 375. 17s. foe se
arimasimica, sad the defendant having refused to pay he u
brought hie action to recover the amount. At the trial, ft
which took place before Mr. Baron Martin at the sittings
in Middlesex after last term, • verdict pared for ths plain- ei
tiff. as
Mr. Joyce sow moved for a rule for • new trial, es
on the ground that the verdict was spinet the evi-
BL
dew% sad of the misdirection by the learned judge. ge,
The real question was whether the 11. per cent. N,
was to be paid when the oestmet to purchase was mitered ill
into or whom it had boss performed. The learned connael e
oonteadati that the real meaning of the agreement between ri
the parties was that the per maw was only to be paid in ak
Ito event of the plaintiff introducing • pawn who wee in
willing and capable of carrying out his walnut, by the pay- Si.
meat of the pcuchiss• money.
The Court was ananimoualy of opinion that there should als
be so rule. They thought that the percentage was to be gLet"
paid when the coat act to purchase wee made, and not ,
when It had been performed. es.
Role refused. k
so

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE. '0
too
(Before the Judge Ordinary.) 109
EDAM AND OTHINII O. BOWL= AND 0211128.-12111 A. Si.
ORDINAZY CAM. 9
This extraordinary case was rammed tide rooming, Mr. all
Coleridge, Q. 0., Mr. H. T. Cole, and Mr. Pritchard ap- 46_
peeringi for the Rev. Mr. Barton, who propounded, as • 7,
the radical to inertias ; the Queen's Advocate, sk
Mr. Hanna. bed Mr. laderwith for Richt d stares and 04.
Elisabeth Bowler, the executors ; Mr. Manion, Q. 0., Mr. NA
J. Brown, Q.C., and Dr. Mushily far John William Ring, Si
the heir general. gq
The Queen's Advocate addressed the mutt at peat
length, ontendlog that the codicil was a manifest for.
pry ; and that there Win aotltio in the surrounding air- 26
cumrsoces to raise the smallest astherdeat probability 29
that the testator, who had shown that up to the 25th of 8$
March hie ruling mina was to tie up his property for to
the en, longest period the law allowed, would oe the god of :
May have executed • paper whisk aritudly disposed 10
of 112,0001. The beamed advocate also sited opals .a
to show that eves when the balance of Gridiron in a
the question of beam-Meg was in hewn of an iostrument M.
produced in a similar 111113111 K, the mart had iavartably as. 4%
fused probate. He called Was Bowler, who said that when it.
she received the codicil sad letters she wee conga that they to
wen sot in Mr. Ring's writing; and. that she after.
et
wards gave them to Mr. Parnell, the solicitor 10
for the estate. The original will and codicil et
had been proved by the Mr. Adams referred to la the letters. 84
At the date of the sadist, and lethal the decreed was se [l.l,
ill that he could an possibly have writtten them. The '"
testator had gine se • reams for tying up the property fee
21 years, that he thought John Ring would sot be ,
living after that time. John Ring bad the a davghter
shoot 17 years of age. Mr. Banco was often in sneer of 14.
his net, and often tacks his promisee to pay up. Mr. •••0
Ring, therefore, said, " Barton Is all lice asd deception, mad 0•0
I must have Bathing to do with him."
[The case was proceeding when we west to prom] tie

Ird.l

SHOCKING DlSCOrzas OF A DEAD CHILD. Itit
(THIS DAY.) es.
ss.

THE EXPRESS, SATURDAY EVENING, MAY 27, 1865.

- pima I
171 1116
4 17
dY F
Lizt