The Express.
London, England, 1862-11-19 00:00:00

-(THIS DAT)

--•--
LT, Notes

ELL
W.
LW.
W.
E.S.E.

N.&
KN.&
N.N.W.
N.N.&
N.N.K.
N.

i. / /./.

=N.B

V.I S.

I It
2 6
lil
Its
44

'CI L
7!
• -

S iti
if -

31
:I4f - -
• o
S -
O c
7 1 -
9 0 -
9 o 3 LI.
✓ it - -
I 2 It -
12 - -

TIRTIUMA T. MINT.
Variable, light, ftne. lloorirero. N N.E. to kt.
light to MA
&N.& to 8.8. E., male. Wuxi% &t to s
rate, tame snow. some or tat,
As shore, with snow, W. CantiAL. B.E. to it.a'
__sleet or rain. to fresh.
_ _

N.l.tos.l..rong to B.W. LS.K _ s I,
moderate. to stow:. nn
X toe., strong to troth, &L E3GLAIID. XB.B to s
sleet. to noon.
LICK to 8.8. K, strong X. OUR. L to s
to modarsts. snow or M.

THE DINTRENB IN LANCASHIRE,—BT. MID
AND HT. JOHN'S. WESTII. snub—At nom this
numerous sod influential meeting of the inhaletsin
united parishes of St. Margaret's and St. Jobe. vs
in the Seeelooll.hOttee, Broad Sanctuary, Westonmte
Very Rev. the Dean of Westminster in the chair. u
measures for the raising of contributions wan
perishes for the relief of thedistreared Lancashireol
The chairman having opened the proceedings, the
passed a vote of sympathy with the &strewed
and expressive of their admiration of the manner
they bore up against the sufferings they had to
Resolutions calculated to carry out the objet in
having been adopted, a committee was appointed to
the contributions of the parishioners. A vote of the
the chains= terminated the proceedings.
COURT or ALDERMEN. —A Court of Alde
was bold yesterday at Guildhall, sod as this was
coeet of the present mayoralty the Lord Mayor I.
Rose) and the sheriffs (Alderman J. C. Lonna
Hugh Jones. Esq.), with the under-sheriffs (Yam
yell and Farrar), went in state from the ALMA
The Lord Mayor, before the comineuceineet of the
business, addeesi:ed a few appropriate obesiodiesits
covet on that his first appearance there is his Dee
A resolution of thanks to the late Lord Mayor ills
efficient manner in which he had discharged the
of his office was thee passed. The usual Slued Mot
the Rev. Mr. Davis, the chaplain of Navigate; was -
aud referred to the Gaol Committee. As 'wheel
permission to store the inflammable material haws
petroleum in certain premises in the City was red •
the General Purposes Committee. Mr. Frederick I
and Mr. William Sheldoick were allowed as City
sad Mr. Walter Homer Brown and Mr. Stephen
Barber were discharged from that offiee. The Pc
Committee brought up a report recommending that tie
and almost obsolete precepts liPusily issued to the
beadles on Lord Mayor's Day should be diecoc:stisi
future, and that a notice of the intended route of the
cession should be sent to the Aldermen of the ilitProt,
instead. The report was agreed to. The court
afterwsrds adjourned.
THE HEALTH OF BIRKENHEAD ASP nit
TROLZUN WORK, —The ratepayers of Birkeoheal
public meeting on Monday emitter fdr the prom 0(
testing against the recent decision of the Nene
Board permitting the storage of petroleum, alai du
tioo of refining works near the great float at Sr •
Several of the gentlemen present denounued the or
the dock board as one which, if persisted in. Itotidk
prejudicial to the health of Birkenhead. Instoxes
enumerated where families residing in the tieighlot.
of the works hal been seized with illness, whico t fir du
attributed to the fearful stench arising (pan the
kern works ; flour dealers compleioed of !Wig
Lions of their stock destroyed by the barrels sad
becoming impregnated with the odour of the
and greengrocers end market-garelsoers el-. 40°1
their vegetables were destroyed by the elute (roe
works. A memorial was them umninewnly duped
questing the Dock Board to rescind their ue,tws,
aced
a more exposed sad uninhabited piece thou Biricebed
their storage and relining of petroleum.
DESTIOCTIVZ FIZZ AT BIRMINCHA3I.--
o'clock yesterday (Tuesday) morning, the butt.
factory of Alderman J. H. Cutler, in New T
Hatatingham, was totally destroyed by fire. The
are
have been burning for some time before it was s.
as it bed proceeded so far that tLe roof of the lookS4
in before the engines from the different are offers
although there was iso loss of time on their rad thg
alarm was given. No estimate of the amount ot
has yet hem gives, but it must be very great, aWV
tity of very valuable machinery being made Celt'
worthless except as old iron. As to the origin d *
everyone is at a loss, as there was within; tort
inflammable about the premise, and all lima etsf.l4
the previous night. Both the building and its contests
insured.
FATAL COLLIERY ACCIDENT.—EseAFE or
Mot.—Yeeterdsy morning, between 8 sod 9 ° • •
colliery accident, unhappily fatal in its result.,
in a pit now being sunk in Park-lane. near Nib
Merin. Mercer and Evans. It appears that eight or
engaged as usual, two, named Goulding and Cotters.
at work rummies a shot, when, by Nome nieseel
reached the powder they were tieing, and so explew .
place, the full for of which had to be borne 11 tm.
workmen above-named, one of whom (Gosildst)
fatal injuries, and the other (Catterellt was so
loam
that his life was despaired of. Strange to ay, a
mining six men who were at work at the time of is
dent, sot one is seriously injured, though the piece!'
they were working was necessarily very small. The
of Goulding has bees removed to the 'Red Liu* 114
the colliery, to await the inquest.
Toisurrelloix Accomir—Fouß MEx _
IN CARRON DAM.—As a number of young nee curl'.
Carron Iron Works were returning from their mono
• day evening, they west ammo the ice on Coro
save them some nrioutes' walk, when the ifflgs:t
about twenty yards from the roma, and selend
were precipitated into twelve feet of water. N.. few°
be
four were drowned. Their bodies were nose
env rata boat belonging to Mr. John pgir."°' a c
IldirsburpA Conessit.

LAW INTELLIGENCE
(THIS DAY.)

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.
(Bdore the Jodie Ordinary.)

r. HOIBERT, MID OU
Dr. Speaks appeared for the petitioner, Mr. John Sicard
Rutter, a clerk to • merchant in Mincing-lane. He married
the respondent in November, 18.5 f, and cohabited with her
for about three years. in 1857 he bad a quarrel with her,
on account of something she had done and of which she was
unable to give a satisfactory explanation. He sent her home
to her parents at Woolwich and paid her lice. a week for
her maintenance. Very shortly after this she *rote to him
stating that she had been confined and demanding an
increased allowance on account of her infant. The
husband, disbelieving this, sent her a document for her to
sign affirming that she had been delivered since she had
left home. In reply, she wrote back to say that she had
penned her letter under the influence of elicit( I feelings ;
that she did not remember whether she had used the ex-',
pression " delivered of • child," and that " perhaps it
would have been more correct to have said a miscarriay."
In the summer of 1859 he traced the respondent to Mar-
gate, where he heard that she was living in adultery with a
fellow.lodger, the co-respondent, Mr. Ernest Hulbert.
Early one Sunday morning, be went with Mr. Davis, a'
solicitor and friend of his, and with the landlord of the lodg-
logs, into her room. She was sitting up in bed, and laughed
in the face of the party According to Mr. Davis the pe-
titioner went up to her, "addressed her in affectionate
terms," and told her what he had heard of her. It was sug-
gested that she had received information of the intended
visit ; and Mr. Davis stated that he had since had an inter-
view with Hulbert, and pressed him to acknowledge the
offence he had committed against society. Hulbert re-'
fused to say anything about it; but he stated that after
they had left the house on the ocession refereed to Mrs.
Rutter had come up to hi+ bedroom and told him sill
about it. Some other evidence tending to show the fa-
miliar terms on which the respondents stood to each other
was then given; and Mr. Charles Hulbert, brother of the
co-respondent, was called upon his subpoena. He did not,
however, appear.
It was then proved that the respondent had lived in
lodgings at Ramsgate with Mr. Merthyr Guest a gentleman
connected with the firm of Guest and Son, ironmasters,
King's Arms-yard, Moorgate-street. They had also cohabited
as man and wife in a furnished house, No. at, Cambridge-
street, Hyde-park, where Mr. Guest ultimately left the
respondent, in consequence, as she said, of the annoyance
her husband had caused him.

Sir C. Cromwell reserved bill judgment u to the adultery
with Hulbert. but said be had no doubt, as to the awe
against Guest.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.
(Before Mr. Commissioner Hon'burn.,
TN RS ELIZABETH WOMBWILL.-SIBUCLAR CASE.
The bankrupt was described as an assistant to a cow-
keeper and dairywoman, of Highbury. This was the exami.
nation sitting, but no accounts had been filed.
Mr. R. Griffith., for the bankrupt, stated that she had
only one creditor (for 5914, and that creditor had been set-
tled with. If the court would allow the case to stand over
a day, legal proof of the settlement would be given, and he
would then ask that the adjudication should be annulled.
His Honour did not think that bankrupts should be allowed
to come to the court on their own petition and in forma
pauper's, and then settle with their creditors.
Mr. Aldridge said the necessary effect of the course pro.
posed would be to dispauperise the banks apt, and she would
be required to pay the costs as if the petition had been pre-
noted in the ordinary course.
Mr. Griffiths mentioned a case in which Mr. Holroyd had
aUowed an adjudication to be annulled under similar car.
cumstancea

His Honour said there was DO assignee in this case, and
they had nothing but the bankrupt's unsupported assertion
that she had only one creditor; for aught that appeared
she might owe hundreds. It could not be allowed that
the parties should avail themselves of the privilege of the
court to sue in forma pauperis, and then, without filing any
accounts, ask to have the adjudication annulled on the
bare allegation that they had settled with their creditors.
The examination would be adjourned sine die and without
protection.

(Before Mr. Registrar Razlitt.)
IN HE WENT.-A GOOD ESTATE.
The bankrupt, a draper, of Riverhead, Kent, came up to
pass his accounts, showing debts of 2,3001., with assets
returned at about 2,0001.
Passed, and a day appointed for the discharge sitting.
IN HI EMILY GODWIN.-DINNISSAL OP PITMON.
The bankrupt, described as a spinster, of Chelsea, bad
come to the court on her own petition, returning her debts
at leas than 300/., and consequently presenting her petition
on a 11. stamp. This was the adjourned examination sitting.
Mr. E. Reed opposed ; Mr. Lucas supported.
It was stated that the bankrupt had surrendered after
presenting her petition, but had Dever appeared at any of
the public sittings or adjournments thereof, of which there
bad been four, owing to her not having filed her accounts.
It also turned out that her debts were considerably over
300/. ; and that she had contracted several debts in a dif-
ferent name from that in which she had petitioned the
court. On these grounds it was asked that the petition be
dismissed.

The Registrar, after consulting with Mr. Commissioner
Ilolroyd, dismissed the petition.

RE RIDINGTON.
This was an application for an order of discharge by
Thos. Ridingtoo, of 15, Finsbury-place South, boot and
shoe maker.

The debts are 435/., and the only available meets are in
the hands of creditors, and valued at 50/.
Mr. Holt, who supported the bankrupt, stated that he
bad been in badness for 'l5 years, and had kept the money
order and post-office at Finsbury for many yens. He had
never failed before, and there was no opposition.
The court granted the order of discharge.

SEIRRIFFW COURT, RED LION-SQUARE.
(Before Mr. Sorjeeme Hayes, Almoner, sod • Speer( Jury.)

I'I'MMINGS V. TIM 31EiliCIPOUTAN RAILWAY eOMPLINT.
This was a compensation one. Only tan special jurors
attended, and by consent the case proceeded Intl that
number.

Mr. Hawking, Q.C., and Mr. Gates were for the claimant,
and Mr. Lloyd, Q.C., with Mr. Holloway, for the company.
An attempt was made to arrange the matter, but Mr.
Lloyd said it could not be done without the consent of Mr.
Jay, the contractor, and he stood away Irons this case.
Mr. Serjesint Hayes said the company would have their
remedy against the contractor.
The case was opened by Mr. Gates, and the claimant called.
The action was to recover compensation for injury done to
the house, 10, Acton street, Gray's-inn-road. Ou the
morning of the 15th of January a land slip occurred, and the
house was at once evacuated, as it was expected to fall. The
premises had not been since occupied, and the sum sought
to be recovered was 600 t. It was expected that when the
trains were worked the injury would be increased.
The case will probably occupy the day.

WESTMINSTER COUNTY COURT.
(Before Mr. Bayley.)
DAUB V. BTNa.
The plaintiff in this case is the welLknows military tailor,
of Regentatreet, and the defendant is the Hon. Witham
Frederick Byng, a brother of the Earl of Strafford, sod
uncle of Lord Enfield, M.P. for the county of Middlesex.
Mr. Best, of the Oxford Circuit, appeared for the plaintiff ;
and Mr. F. Lewis fur the defendant.
Mr. Best, in opening the OM, said that the plaintiff in
this ease was Mr. Thomas Davis, the weli.known army
and military tailor, of Hegel:it-street In the year 1841
the defendant was a captain in the 13th Dragoon Guards
and quartered at Canterbury. He was introduced to Mr.
Davis, and ordered one or two pain of trousers from that
gentleman. He continued dealing with Mr. Ihmis at his
shop, giving him °niers —some of those orders being sent in
letters. He not only applied for clothes for himself, but
ordered them for a gentleman of the name of Clarke. In
one of the letters, dated June 5, 1841, he wrote to Mr.
Davie, '• Please, make the bearer a nice new coat."
(Laughter.)
Mr. Lewis said there was no reason for Mr. Best to
trouble himself by reading the letters. They were not
disputed.
Mr. Best maid be had heard with some regret that his
learned friend intended to shield his client under a plea
which he hoped would not have been set up. It WWI not
disputed by Mr. Byng that he had had the clothes.
Shortly afterwards Mr. Byng left England. and he had now
instructed his counsel to plead the statute of limitations,
which no honourable man would plead if he could avoid
it. If that was to be the defence he must, of course, bow
to the decision of the court, but he sincerely trusted that
his learned friend would set up some more boom/ruble
defence than that. If an honest man had incurred a just
debt, and had articles from a tradesman such as were now
described, be submitted that he ought not to plead the
statute of limitations.

Mr. Lewis said the plaintiff had hai five days notice of
this plea, and ten years' notice as far as Mr. Byng was
concerned, for continual spplicatioos had been made to
him during that Limo for a debt which Mr. Byeg con •
acieotiously believed he had paid. In ordinary cases he
admitted that a gentlemen should not put in such a plea
as this, but Mr. Byng believed he had paid the money, and
under such circuinaLincoo it would be wrong not to set
up the plea. Mr. Best might ask Mr. Byng if he pleased
whether he believed he had paid the mosey.
Mr. Best said he most certainly should avail himself
of the opportunity.
Mr. Byog was then swore, and said he resided at No. 33,
St. George'rraed, Eccleston-square. He was the brother of
the Earl of Strafford. Ile received goods in 1841 from Mr.
Davis to the amount of 48/. 10s., the present claim—at least
he received roods, but be did not remember the amount.
Ile most firmly and honestly and conscientiously believed
that be had paid for them. In August, 1841, he paid Mr.
Davis 100/. and upwards.
Mr. Best—Had that payment of 1001. anything on earth
to do with the claim now before the court?
Mr. Byng—l believe it had.
Mr. Best—Did you ever borrow money of Mr. Davie?
Mr. Byeg— Yee.
Mr. Beet—Had not that 1001. reference to borrowed
money ?

Mr. BY —S portion of it, perhaps, but oot all.
Mr. Dans said ho could prove by his books what the pay-

meat was for, and that it had no reference to the present

The Judge held that it was immaterial. lie did not see
how he could go further into the matter.
Mr. Davis said that if Mr. Byng meant to cheat him
under the statute of limitations, he supposed he must
submit.

ifr.l3ett.—l fear you will never get your money.
Mr. Davia—l don't expect it now ; but I shall go from
this court a much more gratified man than I think Mr.
Byng can be.
Verdict for the defendant.

MIDDLESEX SESSIONS.
(THIS DAY.)

(More Mr. Bodkin, Assistant Judge.)
WTIALING TWO CABS.

Albert Coombe?. 27, was indicted for stealing two cabs,
Value 621., the property of Samuel Clevelend.
Mr. Ribton prosecuted; Mr. Montagu Williams defended
the prisoner.
The prosecutor is an oil and colourman, and also a cab-
owner, living at Walham-green, and hail a cab at
the coachmaker's under repair in February, 1861, which
he agreed to let to the prisoner for 10s. a week, payable in
advance. While the prosecutor was ill in bed, the pri-
soner came to bim and said the cab would require some
little repair before it could be pealed by the inspector of
hackney carriages. On the 4th of March the prisoner
came again and said the cab had been passed, and it was
agreed that the hiring should commence on the next day,
and he paid two weeks' rent for the cab, and
the prisoner hired a second cab, when he'
stated that he had a stable at Mr. Cooper's, at Fulham-
fields, and that he had five horses there, which statement
was entirely false. He never saw the prisoner until some
time afterwards, when he was taken into custody. Only
two days after the prisoner obtained possession of the
first cab, be met Mr. Vann, a cowkeeper, living
at Notting-dale, Kensington, and asked him it he
was about purchasing a cab, and he replied that he was.
The prisoner said be had one to dispose of, and he accord-
ingly went with him to Fulham•fields to look at it. The
prisoner asked 131. for it, stating that he gave that for it,
and was obliged to sell it because he could not get
a horse. A bargain was eventually agreed upon
for 11f. 45., which he banded to the prisoner, and
he gave him a receipt for the money. lad
a few days afterwards the prosecutor came to his yard and
identified the cab as his property. In the same month the
prisoner went to Mr. Haines, a cab proprietor, living at
Hammersmith, and sold the other cab to him fur 211., and
gave a receipt for the money. He said that be bad bought
it, but was going to give up cab work, and take to something
else. The day after the purchase the prosecutor came to the
yard and claimed the cab as his property. It was proved
by Mr. Cooper, of Fulham-fields, that the prisoner had not
' hired stables of him in March, and had no horses there.
Acres, a police-constable, subsequently took the prisoner
into custody on a charge of stealing the cabs, when he said
there were others io it as well as himself.
Mr. Montagu Williams made an able address on behalf
of the prisoner.
The jury found the prisoner Guilty.
The Assistant Judge sentenced him to be imprisoned and
kept to hard labour for 12 months.
Mr. Ribtos applied to his lordship to order the restitution
of the property ; and his lordship said that where property
illegally there was no sale, and he was entitled to it ;
Ciat.t7hde prosecutor had better consult his legal adviser.

THE POLICE COURTS.
(THIS DAY.)

GUILDHALL.
MISCONDUCT IN THE TEMPLE GARDENS.

John Arc;sell, -a
printer, was charged with indecently
exposing his person in the Temple-gardens.
Mr. E. F. Burton conducted the prosecution on behalf of
the benchers of the Temple.
Mr. Surto° said that the bendier, were most anxious to
protect the public using the garden. from indecency, but at
the same time they were not desirous of pressing the case
severely against the prisoner on account of his young wife,
who appeared to be a very respectable person.
Alderman Bailey said it was a very serious charge ; and
however anxious he might be to treat the case leniently,
the act preem:bsd the punishment for the offence, and he
could not depart from it. The public morality must be
preserved, and the least he could do was to commit the
prisoner for one month.

WESTMINSTER.
ROBBERY OF THE HON. HR. DECHLN, M.P.
Ellyn Ford was charged with stealing divers sums of
money entrusted to her by her mistress.
The Hon. Mrs. Denman said—Yesterday morning I re-
ceived a note from my butcher, stating that he had not re.
ceivedany money from July bat. I was much surprised, u
I had given the prisoner the money weekly to pay the
accounts as they came in. She was my cook, and had
been in our service about tee months, and she regularly had
the money to pay the bills up to last Friday. I spoke to
the prisoner about the butcher's bill. She acknowledged
she had bad the money and wanted to go to the butcher's,
and I told her she might. I sent privately to the police,
who also went to the butcher's shop.
Mr. Arnold—What is the amount of money the prisoner
has had
Mrs. lien man-15(. Is. Id.
Arnold—ls the butcher hare?

Polioemari—He is.

Henry Thomas Fekhan', of 101, Marlborough-road, Mel-
ees, aid—l have served the Hon. Mr. Denman for the last
four years. Mrs. Denman's account is only paid up to the
26th of July. 1 never until last night received any money
from the prisoner or anybody else on that account. Yester-
day morning, not feeling satisfied reepecting Mrs. Denman's
account, I wrote to her stating the fact, and I heard that it
bad been delivered to her, as I had requested, because Mrs.
Denman war heard inquiring of her why she had not paid
the butcher. A policeman shot tly afterwards arrived at
my shop and told me the prisoner was coming, and she
directly came. She said, "I have come about the beak,"
and was fairy I hid written to her mistress, ea she might
lose her situation. I informed her that I
tioned any name in my letter, but merely stated
that I had not had my money. She then said
she had had the misfortune on Saturday to lose her purse,
but now had some money about her, with which she would
pay part of the amount, and the reminder by icattlmenta
weekly. I told her I could not allow that; my young men
might as well be expected to pay my debts. I drew her
attention to the circumstance that the last receipt stamp on
the book had been removed from • week which had
been paid to • week further on which had not.
She said sbe wanted the previous week's meat put down,
and then wanted me to take 41. IGe. I told her I would
take the money, but would not put it on the book, but give
her • separate receipt, and I told her I should keep the book
and send it to Mrs. Dennuin. The policeman came into the
parlour, and I gave him a copy of the receipt.
Peter Smith, 163 H. mid—l went to the butcher's, and
placed myself in a position to hear what occurred when the
prisoner was there. I went back and told Mrs. Denman it
was her servant and not the butcher's who was the thief.
I afterwards took misoner into custody.
Mr. Arnold asked pi isomer what she had to say.
Prisoner aid the amount was not quite accurate, but
added—l am gu,lty, your worship.
Mr. Arnold—You are remanded for • week.
DIARLBOROUGHSTREET.
_ DARING ROBBILET AT A YOKE OFFICE.
. _ .

JoksSeotr, describerf as a abrk, was charged before Mr.
Tyeebitt with steeling a number of postage stamps at
Messrs. Berry's, grocers and rio,t•offlee keepers, 3, St.
James's-street, in the following daring manner :
. . . .

Mr. Edward Holmes, assistant to Messrs. Berry, said that
no the previous evening the prisoner route in and asked for
10e. worth of 2d. postage stamps, 7s 6d. worth of 3d.
stamps, and either 2s. or 3s. worth of 4d. stamps. lie
placed the 2d. and 3d. stamps on the desk at the end of the
counter, and stooped to get the other st►mp., when the
prisoner seized the sheet of 60 2d. stamps and rushed out of
the shop. lie immediately pursued the prisoner, and after
a smart chase caught him in Ryder-street, and gave him into
custody.
Robert Jarvis, 116 C, said be took the prisoner to the
station and found in his possession two books, quite new,
entitled the "Cosmopolitan Guide."
Prisoner said he wished the magistrate to dispose of the
risen but on being asked by Mr. Tyrwhitt whether he was
guilty or not he said he took the stamps, but did not steal
them, and upon this Mr. Tyrwhitt said he should commit
the prisoner for trial.
Committed.

SOUTH WARM.
131PODENT ROBBERY AT ♦ OBOCIle&
A tall repulsive-looking man, who gave the name of
William French, wee brought before Mr. Combs, charged
with being concerned with others i• stealing a cask of cur-
rants, value 31.. the property of Mr. Balls, grocer, Great
Dover-street, Southwark.
The prosecutor said that about 7 o'clock on Monday
evening he was receiving a load of goods, and owing to the
want of storage for the moment some of them were placed
on the pavement, ►mong which were • cask of currants,
which be valued at 31. Witness had occasion to go to the
back of the shop for a few momenta to pack up some
goods, and on his return to the front he mused the cask
of currants. About • quarter of an hour afterwards the
currants were restored to him by a witness now in court.
William Roll, a broker, of Eltham-place, Kent-street,
said he was standing at the door on Monday evening when
be saw two men pass with a truck on which was • cask.
The prisoner was pushing behind. A lad came up to wit-
ness. and, having told him that he saw the cask taken from
the door of Mr. Balls, he went after thereon, who scampered
off, leaving the truck and cask behind. Witness then
ascertained that it was • auk of currants belonging to Hr.
Bolls ; consequently be restored them to him immediately.
Dennis Clark, 108 M, said he took the prisoner into cus-
tody last evening, when he denied all knowledge of the
cask of currants. Witness had known him for a long time
as a companion of notorious thieves.
The prisoner pleaded guilty, and
Mr. Comhe sentenced him to four months' hard labour at
Wandsworth.

OITNEAL PALACE. ONE SHILLING DAP.—
TUESDAY, Novelists 13.—Admieeiona on payment, al3;
ditto by mum Wks% 443; total, 856.

iai
10,
100
1011
100

SHARE LJST&-(THIS DAY.)

Two o'Otooz.

Little variation has occurred in the railway market
to-day, which continues very quiet, with transac-
tions to only a limited extent. Caledonian and
South Eastern stocks have declined I per cent.,
the other principal lines being quoted the
same as at the close yesterday. Lou-
don and North Western stock is now quoted
94 to ; Great Western, 66 to } ; Midland,
123} to 129 ; Lancashire and Yorkshire, 108} to
109; Caledonian, 113 to} ; South Eastern, 88} to
; Great Eastern, 46 to 1 ; Great Northern, 124
to 125 ; and London and South Western, 100} to
101}.
Lombardo-Venetian Railway shares remain flat
at 31 to I, ex div. Other foreign lines are without
change of Importance. Indian and Canadian rail-
way shares are steady.