The Express.
London, England, 1865-06-28 00:00:00

PARLIAMENTARY DIVISION.

HOUSE 'OF LORDS.-Jon 26.
RONAN CATHOLIC OATH BILL.
PALM.

FOR SIM BILL.
r arl
Truro, Lord
rite afford, Lori
Normaul.y, Minquir
Coryslort, Earl
Bolger, Lord
Durham. Earl
Stab., Earl
Eversley, Viscount
Leigh, Lord
Kenmore, Earl
Portman, Lord
forteocue, Earl
chichester, Earl
Cbesbant, Lord
Camden, bilarqids
CaringW4 Lord
Horns, Lord
Wrottosloy, lord
Sydney, Viscount
Lucas, Earl
Churchill, Lord
Wbarnellge, Lord
Basting', Lord
Chulemont, Earl
Sligo. Marquis
Pam, Earl
Dormer, Lord
Poltbnore, Lord
Itoselierry, lad
Vivian, lord
Brousdssal. Lord
aindolli, Earl
Etangliom. Earl
ere. e, Lord
Zetiand, Earl
Cottenham, Earl
Corr, Earl
Lyttelton, Lord
Wensleydale. Lord
Sutherland, Duke
Abingdon, Earl
Lansdowne, Marquis
Dorn, Lord
Sefton, Earl
Argyll, Duke
ilrorstsioa, lord
Do Manley, Lord
Londes Lord
ittrangfbo°rd7r.iscount
Conynglaes, MSTQUI2

AOAIII6T rat tat.
Drogheda, ffiaryals
Erne, Earl
Boynton, Lord
Salisbury,
evershani= F
Croftoo, Lord
Morton, Earl
Dartmouth, Earl
Cornorsm Earl
Warwick, Earl
Sheffield, Earl
Clancarty, kart
11111, aconot
llttLcleueli, Duke
Denegall, Mantas
Dynetor, Lord
helm,. Fart
Detainers, Lord
Rayleigh, Lord
Canterbury. Archbishop
Dr Sauntorer, Lord
Climbrock, Lord
Lanesboroorib. Earl
Leitrim, Earl
Berwick, Loral
Vs:calm, Earl
Blantyre. Lord
Forams, Lord
Dishy, Lord
Howe, Uzi
Forester, Lord
leconSeld, Lord
Gloucester, Bishop
Abinger, Lord
Raglan, Lord
Lonsdala Earl
&home, Fart
Cadegon, Fart
Ravens. 0114 Lord
Sandwich. Fart
Ilacckatield. tad
Gage, Viscount
Canterbm, Via:omit
Egerton, Lord
Beaufort, Duke
York, Archbishop
Winchester. Bishop
Darnley, Bark
Westmoreland. Earl
Mount Edgcumbe, Bari
De Res, Lord

ELECTION INTELLIGENCE.

CITY OF LONDON.
Last evening Mr. Lysll and Mr. Fowler, the
conservative candidates for the City, met the electors for
the first time at the Bay -tree Tavern, Bt. Swahili's-east
King.Williametthet, in order to explain their poddewasd
prinapiss. Sir THOMAH Ilium° occupied the chair, and
supported by Idesers....7. A. Cotton C. 0., J. K. Lusk,
Howley, Frseman,ilarewirod,J. H. Linkltter, K
J. IL Briley,
and other gentlemen interested iin the election.
The CHAIRMAN having opened the prooserliogs,
Mr. LYALL thanked the electors of London for the ho-
nour they had in former times dose his father by seeding
him to parliament to represent them. He we. a moderate
°enervative, and while he Wallin advocate for progress, he
was not one of those who would agree to a sudden change la
the sonatitution Herres not prepared to sanction the se
that bad been made on the church ; and although he yea
prepared to go for progressive reform', he was opposed to 1
sett of spoinitioe. He also objected to the 61. flambee 1
because he did not think it Ines to give up the privi-
lags, of one oboe of the maple and entrust them to mother
else which was not yet prepared to eremite them. (Chores.)
He differed from he opponents with regard to the
question of the ballot, bowee he believed that it
would prove futile, and wee unconstitutional and re-
tirely unsuited to the character of Englishmen. (Cheers.)
He thanked them for the hied reception they had given
him, sad assured them that for the mks of the cases in
which they were engaged, for the principles which they pro-
fessed, for the interests of the country and for their own,
he was determined to fight the battle with their assistance
to the last.
Hr. Formal regretted that some one of greater Mathes
bed sot come forward on the present wreaks ; bat wiles
be was raked to acts th his friend- Mr. Lail, he was
obliged to put snide ery selfish feeling and to ems
forward to represent the moderate views of the comas.
Ma party. M thought that they had lost a good member
is Bir J. Duke, one who, without secrificing hie own princi-
ples, was the best friend of the wasenatives in the City.
This was not a parliament that was going to the country on
say particular point, but one that was &solved by lapse
of time. Lord Palmerston did not promise any meteure
of reform, bat was willing to go in for a radical reform
bill if there were a stoog feelin; m that direction, or would
let the franchise stand where it wee if the feeling should
be the other way. With those indefinite views with
what oosfidenee could they be trusted? It had
I been said that small boroughs ought to be abolished,
but he disagreed with that principle. arid thought that they
' ought not to be disturbed enter is cases of bribery,
' then that the reprereatation stoma be transferred to other
I smentituescies. With regard to our foreign policy, be
strongly advocated the principle of nes-istervention, bat be
thought that acting the part of the bully to small Blain
whichcoerld sot redid us, such as Brazil mid Japsn, was net
• coutss which would coeduos to the bosom of Engleed.
(Hear.) With regard to thechareli he was papered torelieve
the
pre
pa
beneurgrievanosithor laboured laularshwtbs
was got pared to take away the mild control of the
okerrela, width was pun in its doctrine' and tolerate in its
diedlthan sad practice. He was nreparod for moderate sad
velem ; bat he withid it Or be fairly dealt out
Perrirliewa, beer.) While he admitted the right of the
ethlethitt of the franchise to the working classes there wee
It elms width deserved it as much se they did. Hatallocled
to thil clerks is beekin houses and other establishments of
the same character. (Hem, hear.) The liberal government
betaliver Wean eppeetsnity rd attheidog their rights and
aielvdeges, sad he referred to the lest they had made is the'
eadeavonr to take truer the My the control of their police.