The Express.
London, England, 1849-12-13 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, THURSDAY EVENING, DECEMBER 13, 1849.

that conclude conclude the doetrt-is of the church of G
hat d to
rts
as he might think fit. What was tut
main; up a standard of his own ? The article, themselves
wen pawed ban the purpom 4 establishing unifsrmity nf
doctrine. The question 01 refusing to insulate was precisely
the same as the gustion of depravation. On this subjoct,
the learned counsel referred to " Visee's Abridgment,
where it was sold d
that it must be dose in a brutal
Bishop Apply the test, sad see whether in this am the
Bishop could refuse to Institut& It was not alleged that
there could be found anywhere • statement of the effect of
Ur tham's doctrines.
Lor Gd
Langdale—There is no distinct allegation of their
effect He Terner.—He bad no idea whether the doctrine of
the Bishop el lamer egreed with that of the church. From
begionim
_se dm ead of this ease, there was no allege,
tolls by-the Blimp what was the doctrine of the Church of
England what woo his view of the doctrine ot the church of
England on the WOO of regeneration. lie doubted whe-
ther the Bishop of Easter and the Judge of the Court of
Araks agreed ia their doctrine. If he went to take the
questions pet by the Bishop of Bum, he was satisfied that
to and time judo were at issue upoa the mesas of spiritual
regeanation. Of what ass were the proceedings maintained
by the Whop In the examination of Mr. Gorham UMW he
could show that the answers to the examination ontained
doetriaes contrary or repugnant to the articles
of the church? He put a different comtruction
hem the Bishop of Baiter upon certain sen•
teams. The allegation wee confided to thin, that
he entertained Matrices which were unsound on
the subject of baptism. Re asked whether any 'nausea was
to be felted in which • charge of heresy had been maintained
except upon the articles a the church of Reiland ? This
point had occurred ia an early stage. He had inquired whe-
ther there IMO Lateness of precooks; on allegations of
unsound doetrim against the chiuch, end he believed there
were not say nth. It WOO IL strong confirmation of the
view which be bad takes Is the early part of the
that the arida were the exclusive standard of tbell ,
ef the church ; that you could find no llgsliso.
inseams of a charge of heresy on the sersises,l
" Speaker's ems," (5 Coke), and " Bobinscia's Embesies.l
timl Law" were authorities on this point. Se did net
disputes that they were 'stilled to examine fats the doctrine.
but if they did examise, they were to take the doctrise
of the 'ruche of the *Web, and not take the destrim of
inference. He had sow hie duty towurds this
ems except drawing their ' satiation to the juke
meat of the karma jade. The esnossi thee ma
several exams iron the judgment of Sr amber. J. FOIL
widish, be maintained, did not heM the elsolehme el Me
wades.
Dr. Bs followed on the same side. He believed that
this was the lest time ia war history since the days of
the refeenestima, sad aims the atlklos were establaked
ke seemeeles mead religion in this ream, is which a clerk
▪ id ah vomis maimmtamerst him ter upholding un-
mail details% whim be bad profesmedly granted all
the &maim ifish we slated la the snides of the church,
when he had been Weeded esplarilly en that ground by
his counsel, and when the adverse sentence went on this
mappositioa, that there was &Ohba. actually contained ia
them articles from which it was possible to show that be bad
maintained any matted doctrine. If the judgment of the
lower court were *filmed, it would be a direct eoatudictioa
to the gesseral polity which the church of England had
'always_ pursued. lie apprehended that, as far as emir
thug discipline, and's@ far as sound religion woad per
the policy of the church of England had always bees
inclusive sad not exchaive ; it had always been to spread
her arms is widely as possible, cad embrace as many lair
bitaate of them comatries es she possibly could. This sp-
ina the laistorisas who related the introductions of
Intor9e,dwed the *Aides of these periods. Psky, in the fine
volume of his " Eadmia Reseerata," p. 163, speak* of the
Prayer-book in 1540, said that is most parts the leaned
men amen the papists makemed to it, became they feud
it differ Ma thi Latin minim. TM bosh was am& so
parable maga the implies, that for 10 years they generally
repaired he the psi& elmock without doubt Cr simple.
The seise dd.g wee stated by Bernet to have occurred
with rapist to the introdustion of the ankles. He by that if this &arias whisk wee imialeimd by Mr.
Gorham was mowelak the
afteZegoisim suet be to show
that the doming ef Wind ems ensladei from the
articles. It was important to sae whet bed bees ism ia the
public acts, and how the articles followed on them Is the
formulary by Lloyd he found it stated what was the case as
1648. The great pr
to infants in premise
pertained
imitating life ap-
pertained not only to sigh as were of reasonable age, but
also to infants sad children. In 1637. it was stated
that the promise of goose and everlasting We ap-
pertained not only to such as had the use ofinfants
rea-
son, but to all intents and purposes to
and children, and by the ar.rament of baptism they also
obtained remission of their sins. In the King's Both it was
said that lapdog win offered unto infants, whereby they
received forgiveness of their sins end snob gram from the
Holy Ghost that if they died in the state of their infancy,
they thereby nadoobtedly were saved. The same doctrine
was held when they wage reviewing the articles for the last
time ist 1671.
addressed the mart on the part of the Bishop
Dr. Addams
of Easter. Hamm semen to think that Mr. Gor-
ham's &striae were mosand, the bishop exercised
his right amt di
seherged his duty on the first examiastion.
They bed be Med of the length of the examination,
of the sunder et the hewn it occupied, sad of the number of
qualms whisk had bees put, the mower to which was
dist spa the tea of the book itself the vainateness of the
examiwolles wee mei,* awing to Mr. Gorham. The con-
dad Whop wee the most kind sad ameiliatory. a.
wkm giesa Ur. Chaim& an =nhimgist :i
Tim
ad
the Meares el the C el
hisway es to 'sable him tNOve him en answer sada.
, =le hie won Fifemniastims were pie
wader et Kr. Gahm fa-
misted ima hie right of publishing whatever had
token gime between himself and the Bishop el
I Iseter, ant upon that his examination reseeded
mash Woad the limits to which it was intended
.411=IyIllniananissonaret mat
subjectl .i
of
and the bishop were sot
generaties
The judge released not to know what was the destine of
regeserstion, and he complained that the Mass
were set fairly raised on the record. If any error was seer
milawil, it win not fair to throw that error in the teeth of the
erreleMbee. The question between the bishop and M.
Gorham me not twardealarly the effect of spiritual roger
rks, net what It was and what is swayed 1
hat the anrooadases with which the Diem al
Exeter charged lb. Gahm wan this, that la minlishled 1
that no spiriting bobelletbeditalo missed
hem asgthis. Is I
said that them were opearsakas arm whisk the sessibees
of the Mardi of Dogma might entertain diarist sad very
opposite sprigs& Mr. Osetrans said that he sepassied the
gram tram the rem sent &egotism • he did am air that
they had any _ eamestien hawses ' them. That me the
hermy of *Mel the bishop somplained. It was hapenibi•
to read the hdrainstisa of his book without sesillg_that Kr.
()whom, in this esatreveny, had entirely fell*. imhasgsi
the bishop with the interim of
Miens ea
this country the horrors al psM.; he elm bask
sadr
to repranit the* the -deetlines kid dmni by
the bielep, with respect to the keorsm of Infante, were elm
laid dews with respect to the bspeim of adults ; he actuelly
eadeavessed so liz on the bishop the opinioa that the efficacy
of haptim was as opus weals.
Dr. Addams Mae stated that be wed not proceed further
withoem his books, which he had not with him, not having
bees e• _to be called upon to speak to day, and the
mart fleed. shortly before fear o'clock till Friday.

bases or other vehicles to Birkenhead (16 miles), and then.'
over the Mersey by the ferry boa's to Liverpoel. The dia
tame frees B rusingham to Liverpool by this routs of the
plaintiffs is only seven or eight miles more than the ra
ense ofilway
of the London and North Western, and the exp
passengers is coneidereble lees. Hence the opposition of the
latter line, and oleo of the Birkenhead and Chester Oim-
pony, who charge 3s. W. for paruser+ betueen those
places, while the plaintiffs have arranged to carry
them in omnibuses foe Is. 6d.,and they also carry from
Shrewsbury by railway to Wolverhampton at a little more
than one shilling. On the 13th of last smith the station
committee resolved, by a majority of ten to two (those two
being the appointees of the plaintiffs), that the plaintiff
and
s
should not have the facility of booking pameogers bey
B.vewsbury, or have what is culled at statlees the "through"
traffic, Of the advaatane of omnibuses or other vehicles to
cony mesegen at goods, except to Chester city, and with
that slew barricades were erected at a distance of 120 yards
to exclude all vehicles except ouch as pledged themselves not
to carry beyond the city. The plaintiffs then died the. re.
seat bill, cad the Vice-Chancellor, alter hearing e ral
patios, Maud for two days (the 4th and 6th inst.), granted
the limited Intametion above stated, declining to give his
opinion ea the Interroptica to the station secommodation
for the eteihone, which the plaintiffs now eeek to make a
pert of the inksseties. The learneJ counsel argued that the
plallalbilele Galled is the same complete and unrestricted
- —.moulded. ecthe ee station which the defendant

----------------
Mr. Arnold wished to be informed as to who were the
persons at whnse Instigation the defendant had been katged
in the workhouse?
Sergeant For r plied that he believed the original pro-
moter wan the ch teudant's own wlfe, who bad obtained •
certificate from Mr. Bowers, a medical iriend of the defend•
ant, whose opinion as to the unsoundni si of the detendant's
mind was alto confirmed by the divisional police surgeon,
A reap, stably dressed lady-like woman then entered the
witness box to give evidence upon this point, but the di fond-
ant having instantly objected to her testimony being received,
upon the ground that she wee his wife, and that ber evidence
was not therefore legally admissible ; Mr. Arnold slloweu
the objection, and the witness therefore wee not sworn.
During the elimination of the witness the defendant
made repeated appeals to the magistrate against the validity
of the proceedings vflgeh bad been adopted against him,
which, he centended, were grimly illegal and oppressive
Gem beginning to end, his insanity had entirely failed to be
established, and he claimed his discharge, with the expressed
determination to seek legal redress irom the parish authori-
i ties for placing him in such a degrading and humiliating
._ .