The Express.
London, England, 1856-06-14 00:00:00

ITTTITITA •T NMI PAM • T W 4

LOAD rAIdPIELL

•IDDOLPIT O. LIU AND OTHINS, ASSIONEL9.- ACTION TO

',Cottle. As teTATE.
Thu or an attire of *Patient to reeom pastrami of on state
riled The Grasse, in MagaOrbire, and waa soneiderahM imperi-
ous to the parties interested, Manuel u the result of it would de-
termine the right not only to this estate but to valuable property in
ochre pane of the country.
The plaintiff, Mr. A Wray John William Biddiaph, was represented
by Sir P. Tinnier, Mr. H. MIL art Mr. Budder, ; Sir F. Kelly,
Mr. Keating, Mr Lush, and Mr. Fleming appears] flee the defend.
ants, who sere the reigns. of the late Anthony Oro. William old.
oulph. a bankru,ii, rot the tether of the plaintiff; and Mr. B ivi!l sod
Mr. Phipsou attended on the part of Lord Camay., who was outran-
Ugly the defaulter in the cue.
Vera the Guru garment of counsel it appeared that tbe plata-
SI claimed the muse a. the heir at law of the two daughters of
Therm Itiddulph, who were born at Lille, in France. as long age cs
If and the only queetions of fact for the jury were whether them
chiUren bad ere existed, and if e 0 wht they they were the true of
Thome. Btddulph. by Margaret hie wife, to whom he was m 're-EU at
Brighton on the Seth of Lets:ober, 1715. It rested that their bu-
tt-in was registered in Praire, but the Minter of Juror had de-
clined to allow the , rng,osl documents to be brought to this country,
and the pluatiff was only able, therefore, to produce properly authen-
ticated mate. of them.
Sir F. Kelty ohaectee to the admissibility of this evidence, and after
role durum at sae soured th.t It should be reo, Iced, sad that
the queetion es to Pa admissoboity should bo lett for the decision of
the ma court, together with other mints of law erring upon the 4.
etruments tinder which th.- plaintiff claimed.
Lord Campbell raid, if the di:turnout purporting to be copies of
th• register in France were correct, they proved beyond the
poribility of a doubt both the birth end the paternity of the two
children.

y intimated that Lord Camps had kit it his duty to en-
Naga counsel to watch the case on ,his behalf, as it had always
been understoml in the family that Thomas had died wit/e..ut hone.
and as nothing bad bees heard of these children until a compara-
tively recent p. rind.
The marriage was than proved by the •fear of Brighton. Copies
of the register of Moil= of the children were out in, and Noesseur
Denny, an avocet .t Lille, proved the law of France respecting the
reiktratlon of baptisms at the period in question.
The jury, under the direction of his lordship, then found s verdict
for the pkintalf, subject to the opinion of the court above on the
points of law.

BIDDULYR O. LORD CAltoLll.-11DDOLII O. MILLISH.
In these cases, 1 which precisely the same violin's@ of law and
feet were Involved, a yerdist was also takes. by. accrue, for the
&AMIE

COURT OF EXCHRQURP.--Julgs 13.

IMITOPOS AT ILU 1•1101 AT

LAM •PID =MON !VMS:

Tide was the fret day of the matinee after tens. The lint contained
faventy-loon PUMP.

EVANS Ir. WISTON —A RIAD CASS.
Mr. Edwin James and Mr. gain appeared for the plaintff, and
Mr. O'Malley, in the atoms of Mr. Gray, conducted the defence.
ibis was an setlon brought by the plaiabff to recover in right of
his wile theism of 3791. from the defendant, Mr. Plenum, a surgeon
residing in the neighbourhood of the Regent's. park, for money lent,
and on an mount stated. The defendant pleaded a eat off of 3161.
To establish the plaintiff's eon,

Mrs. Jane Evs;;;••m:lied, and Plated that she was the plaintiff's
wife. On the 12th of May, 1052, being then unmarried, she went to
residewith the defendant as governess to his children at • 'Maly of
101. a year. In the May of the following year, she sold out 2001.
which 'be had in the Tbres.snd•s.puarter ter Cent. Cowie., and
lent It to the defendant, who was in ecoMmaared circumstances. In
August she lent • furt►er sum of loet , and during the time the was
In Ills defendant's meek*, where she remain, d till October. 1824, she
advanced bim beside', vatious smell sum. smotantmg to 111.25. 6d.
None of these amount* bad been repaid, neither bad she received any
portions' beg salary:. . . .

Cromemenine 1-Bhe kid been ill after the entered upon her situa-
tion, hat not seriously, so as to Incapacitate her Mom dincharging her
dais. Mr. Weeion had glees her tome medicine.
Mr. lamas—Oh 1 1 suppose the eel-off is for medicine. (Laughter.)
Mr. O'Malley said he did not test justified to proceeding further
with the cue. Has learned ((hod had handed ham a letter, written
by the defendant, which timely put an end to the plea of net oft.
The Mot Baron directed the Jury to return a verdict for the plain-
tiff tar Mil. 12a. 6d., making a deductii a Mom the amount claimed of
161. fa. 6d., the rate of intermit charged bring too high.
Mr. fames applied lot =media!' execution, which was at ono*
granted.

COURT OF

r.-JUNE 13.