The Express.
London, England, 1853-07-27 00:00:00

CRICKET:

SUSSEX (WITII GEO. FARE) T.
match waa resunc., yvbterlay with the fol'owine
England, first tunings, 123, tecoLil inaings, 227. S{{lGe3k ,
first Imlay, 80.

taw *nitMunn.

HOUSE OF LORDS.—YESTERDAY.
Coineirtsa roe rasemsoes.
Tun Duiczoov or bloirtanal.

't he Sot, .tor-U coral occupied the whole day 'n corr.-
Intl:1110g on the evident:* is this ease, sad had a 4 et solo& d
when the house arkjousseL

ADMIRALTY COURT.—YEinatrAT.
Derma Ds. Lownwarest.

Tat DI.THIMS or KINT.—SALVA,II.

This m a suit to recover compensation (or services nr-
dewed by the parties proceeding—nsmelv, gni n lin c fry
no lb. business of diver., for raising the Duchess 01 ii.eut
steamer, which, it will be remember's', was ran down a
little above Gravesend, by the Ravensbotirne, in tie month
of July, 1532. The poiuta in di.pute were—tint, whether
,r not a wr tten agreement to raise the weasel, without bee
walergoing further injury, fur the sum of 2u0?., had been
et t aside for a verbal bargain to do the work for 101. • day
and sscondly. whether the divers bad not greatly injured
the property. The evidence in the cause was gnatly
r: pant, the value of the property raised being estimated by
the divers at 2.13'2', awl by the owners of the Den.l.4
of Kent (the Commercial Steam racket Cospati) at
only 2001.
'I he Queen's Advocate and Dr. Twiss appeared for the
salvors ; Drs. Addams and Daybed for the company.
After a lengthened hearing,
'lns Trinity Masters expressed their opinion that there
bad been a gnat aunt of skill and juilglient on the par of
the salvors; and that, had due care Wen taken, the wreck
and machinery might have been securely grounded withaut
material injury.
The Court therefore pronounced against the claim, with
costs.

MAOLLLAN PIa►TRA.
Dr. Lashington gave seztence. ll* was of opinion
that Commander Stewart's claim fell fairly within the
meaning of the act of the 13th end 11th N mt., chap. 26,
End that be had taken twenty-eight men out of the Eliza
Corni►h, und had captured filty.six in Wood's Bay. Ile
tourel, however, that only 150 men had been taken out of
the Florida, in►tead of the 200 alleged. Ile (the learned
I.l.ictor) could not but think that it wus pre. isely for ser-
•icee such as these that the legislature had intended to give
the rewards specified en the act.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT.—YEsTERDAT.

DhrO&S ■I. Commons Law.
IN TIM MATIZIL Or THOMAS W kIAAS HALL.

SEDUCTION.

This insolvent, an omnibus driver, applied to to
charged from prison.
Mr. Sargood opposed for Mr. Bugbee, the detaining cre-
ditor, for the damages in an action brought for the seduc-
tion of his daughter; Mr. Reed supported.
'the proceedings is the action, "Bugbee v. Marshal',"
were put is evideace. It was an action for seduction, and
the damages were laid at .1001. Judgment was allowed to
go by "'fault, and the jury awarded 1001. The costs were
Lased at blf. 17s. 21. The plaintiff is a retired tradesman,
tiling In Bath-place, Hounslow. Several witnesses were
called on the OZIPOUtiOR of the writ of inquiry, on the part
et the plaiatiff, but not fcr the defendant. lie did not
appear.
lo answer to Kr. Sargood, the insolvent said he was an
mashes driver. and had been so for nearly twenty years.
Hs had been a barman at the Tey Tavern, Hampton. He
had lived with his mother for awns time ; she had no pro-
perry. About fifteen year. ago be was in partnership with
person is the omnibus business. His salary as
driver was If. a week, and he said he had so fees or any-
thing eff that wt.
Os the ssOject of the action, the insolvent was examined
by his cosset!, Kr. Reed. He stated that he saw the
plaintiff's daughter on New Year's Eve, 1552, in a pubiis
house. He was in company, drieking sad smoking, with
fourteen or fifteen other persons. There was only one other
female. lad that wee Mr. liugbee's servant. Miss Bo bee
came afterwards for the servant; abe said she came to fetch
the servant. He (the insolvent) was introduced to her by
• young lass named Taplor, who was formerly acquainted
with her. Daring the time she was them (at the public
beset), lomat gentlemen took the liberty of kissing the
young lady, and be did the same. He farther said he did
nut appear to the antics—he had sat the means.
Mr. %mood addressed the court. The cam bad not bees
mended or varied by the evidence which had just bee.
gives. It was true that the acquaintance began is the
manner described, and the only thing the court bad to do
wee to pronounce a judgment commensurate with the ia-
jury. The opposing creditor was a retired tradesman with
ewe daughter, sad that daughter had been sedated by the
insolvent. The jury had given LOU!. damages, and that
showed the opiaion they entertained. It was 1001. against
an omeibes driver with If. a week, and his duty was to ask
the mart to give each a remand as would satiefy the justice
of the ease. _

Mr. lived, in mitigation, urged that there wee no awe-
vatiag eueumstastem is the ease. The damages were laid
at 4001., sad wily 1001. given. Besides, the court bad heard
ao

Mr. Commissioner Law sold no evidesce could be given
In the court on the subject. That was the rule.
Mr. Reed was aware of the rule. It was a case of poverty
on the pert of the insolvent, as wee proved by his non-
appearance on the trial for the want of meant
Mr. Commisoioner Law pronounced a judgment of nine
calesdar months from the resting order for ILA) damages
awarded In the action for seducti3n.

Sanaa Ma. Coatatiatona runup!.
Ix THE liArrso or WILLIAM MILLEa.

The insolvent was a biker in Banle-terrace, and renewed
an application foe • protecting order. The case had ►een
before rtportad. An offer to pay 211. into court was now
made.

Idr. Dowse and Mr. Macrae complained that the properry
bad not been given up.
Mr. Commusioncr Philips expressed a similar opinion.
The ease had began in fraud and ended in fraud. He sent
the ',solvent beck to prison wall justice was done to the
creditors.
Adjourned sine die.