The Express.
London, England, 1849-06-11 00:00:00

rule, sad Mr. ihrjeant Knight sad Kr. Pitt Taylor were ordered to be in attendance to render ailiesaa
hued in support of lad • • • • • should be required. , can is
The Court in giving judpaant said thr ceisdirecticat eon- Miu Benham said she was acquainted with Mt Mille sec
plietalkteredinofquwassatioain
ought
respeoMm
have, liretliseny eofded that thbeymtheeanjaingioft
loth:
usaMr."Wtheatsodno,fradanand thvastrooshet Ittr.bzwarwingiitiofour sotaatseintMep i
not lett for the jury to determine, and seotountadliz, that. the and threaten. to best his wife with it, sad hid .6
emotion of disobedience was wrongly stated to eat. Now rehear; him declare that he would stab her with a knife.
It "to be observed that these was a great of extriniks The defendant, in reply to the charge, accused Yr. son. .444,0 awadaead to the ems to show la what sense the of having taken advantage of his spiritual office to elks;
pialatiff meat hare nudastood empreselta "bunkum Yrs. Weasel, and said he had plenty of evidence to pews c,
poses." It wee contended for the plaintiff that he eight Mr. Ivailtam, said be would not enter into that is—assth„—
e=have understood the orders in the sense w No doubt the defendant conceived he was an injuisd',
the payment of Ms own salary, and on behalf ofd.- whetherpeserigtmaiht ordswrongmr.
miiut slit:anniotaforherhimmatoi
qty'su i;sabi,,7:
hadeat it was urged they were so plain that the plaiatiffnusee must tor rentreioed, and he was not justified in mica
be taken to have kaewingly dieobeyed them. But in such threats as kis lied done. Re must Ball upon the defealsetuitte
ars wlvire the expreeeloo used in a written document is enter into his owe recognisance, is the sum of 401., to k-m;
sseeesambiguisosusq,uthestieeonlesfotionr
thuepizlrythe.
and
aispoebetwzont thee
flat
;lot;
the
ant
arm
=mew
a tea,
tet. Then as to the precise quesdon left to the jury. The satity was sawed fate, and the parties left the c
question whether the plaintiff had knowingly acted
matrary to orders, was that on which the parties had rested
their rights at the trial, and was substantially the question
left by the judge for the opinion of the jury. It was
said the mode of putting it by the judge raised the
emanation whether the plaintiff was morally wrong is
past of motive' but the fast was they had been is reality
asked whether tne plaintiff had intentionally disobeyed
orders ; and that was the grew question to have been left to
them. With regard lathe verities being against evidence, the
judge who tried the sawm was sathiled with the verdict ; and
it was not so clearly wan re to Waco the court to inter-
fere. There was la the ether ground insisted upon
as to the amount of the . The rule for a new trial
would therefore be disebarg ou all the grounds.
Rule discharged accordingly.
lIAIOOOIT O. DIXOX.—MOTION TO titan aft ATTOILNZT
OTT ran ROLLS.
In this ems a rule nisi had been granted, calling upon
Mr. Edmond Garbett, an attorney of this court, to show
cause why he should not be rruck off the rolls on the
ground of his hernia knowingly adopted and used a false
affidavit at the master's adios, upon the tandem of costs in
the above muse. The rule now came on to be argued, but
as the arguments of °outset were still unfinished at the
rising of the court, we defer for the present • faller insertion
of the ease.

Ju;el4
0
June X
0
June 14
Juno X
Jaw 21
in., 14

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.
arrnigss or Banco.

WALLiv, M.P., v. Came Jaw HIALIT—LiaiL—Tan
Rol:mm.ow FLoooixo CAss.

This was as action brought b the IY/TOMIT for Middlesex
fer certain libellous articles is tie Medical Times, of which
the defendants were the registered proprietors. It may be
remembered that the trial occued throe entire days beta"
the Lord Chief Baron, at Middlesex, the sittings after Hilary
Term last, when a verdict was returned for the plaintiff,
with 3601. damages. A rule nisi fora new trial was subse-
quently obtained, by Mr. Serjeant Wilkins, on the ground
of misdirection. Mr. B. James and Mr. Bramwell (in the
absence of the Attorney-General) appeared on Saturday to
show dune against that rule, but the first-named learned
counsel had not prosmeded with his argument more than •
few minutes, when the Court rose. The case will be re-
sumed this morning (Monday).