The Express.
London, England, 1865-10-12 00:00:00

THI RIAISTBATION&

OITY Or LONDON.
In the precinct of Whitetriess, yesterday. Mr. Jobs An-
derson, who is on the register as oecupyier premiaa et 7.
Temple-etreet, woe objected to by the libewsla.
Mr. Asdereon appeared in support of his gualiftratios.
sad suited she; he hod oempied the minims for 13 yew.
They wars of the regulate value.
In reply to Mr. Ledger, Mr. Anderson Metal that he had
to brother of the name of James, who yes his managing
mac. He paid hint s Wary, but he hod 110 part in the
Warm&
The Rewistog Banister thought tho objection bad.
Mx. Lodger said the panto was expunged loot year ea Dis
some objection.
gly
The name woe socardlo retalood.
In the isms precinct Mr. Nathaniel Powell, who is os
the register in roimat of premises canopied by him at 89,
Chancery-Lam, woo objected to by the liberals.
Mr. Powell stated that he had s bedroom os the Psi
seism, titled up for his exclusive rum, sad which be aoald
sheep in whose's? be chose.
The Raviolis Barrister—And have you slept in it in the
coarse of the six mouths provioal to Um 31st July list ?
Mr. Powoll—No, 1 hams net I bam of slept Gigs
I Tunis
lye tho bedroom iu comeguense of bowing
previously obioctod to and my name oxpsogsd.
The Revising /3orrister—Yes. but tables sad oisirs will
not coostituto a reablearm Too mast also sloop os the

Prensimes.
Mr. Carlisle—Do you go there daring the cloy?
Mr. Powell—Not to that peat cd the premises.
Mr. &decoy Smith—The fact is that the premises are his
brother's, and he resides at Stetted.
Mr. Carlisle eresteoded that such did not affect the case,
and referred to the case of Mr. Harvey, deeded by Ar.
Hamm at last year's revision, in whinh he held that
where a person had a reside/mos his sleeping on the pris-
-1211•011 was not necessary to constitute a qua ideation.
The Revising Barrister, however, held that in Mr.
Powell's ease the requisites were wanting which were ne-
cessary to constitute • moroisoos, sad sostainod the ob
tion.
The name was accordingly ex
Mr. Carlisle said it would be Trit some understanding
were come to in respect of what constituted a residence,
sad asked the Revising Barrister whether, were Mr.
Powell to sleep in this bed-room some two or three times
during the six months previous to the Slat of Jaly
next, it would constitute • residence and meter • quell-

licatire.
The Revising Barrister said he could not mom the
question put in that abstract form. Besides he did net
thiok It was his province to tell them how to mammies-
tore votes.
In the parish of Allhallows, Lombard-Argot, the names
of the members of the firm of Barclay, Bevan, Mateo, and
Co., the bathers, who are on the reveler in resoles of pro.
mime Nos. 51 and 52, Loteboad-street, were objected to by
the liberals.
Mr. Carlisle, in rapport of the votes being
stated that during the electoral jeer the premises
pad
by the firm were takes down sad rebuilt, and that during
the interval they were being so rebuilt they ooly oesepied
two cellars, or strong rooms, where miss and books were
kept, and which wets daily occupied. .des
respect of the
suing, they had sot paid thy rates far the premises, se
none were asked for, but the DAMS A the parties were still
kept on the rate books.
Yr. Ledger referred to the case of Mew& Carney, which
occurred in 1846, under assay similar eirthemathese, and
in which the qualification was held to be sufileimmt.
Mr. Sidney Smith said, after folly eoesideriag the ease,
be thought the objection should be withdraws. In MIER
Gurney's case there was a seller or drool room retained
while the premises were being reheat, Is which a safe was
kept, but there went no books or papers kept withia and
it was never need. In this cam there were both books and
papers kept, and the premises were deny occupied. As to
the rating, he thought that the feet of rates having been
paid did not affect the qualification—the games of the par-
ties being still oa the rate-book. The words of the statute
were " shall have psid Al rites that shall have become pay-
able," but where no rates were needs theycould sot have be-
come LI
payable.
The Revising Barrister thought the qualification wee good, 1
as the lower porticos of the premises were occupied during
the rebuilding of the premises.
The names of all the members of the firm were accordingly
retained epos the lit.
The result of the day's revision as supplied by the Liberal
Asseeiatlon is as follows :
liberal claims allowed l6
Disallowed
Conservative claims allowed
Disallowed lO
Liberal objections sustained B3
Failed or withdrawn
Conservative objections ereeised 44
Failed or withdrawn 22
Of dime 21 were double °bier:lgor, and 3 were expunged
by the barrister.
The Conservative Amociation returned se follows :
Conservative claims and objectioes sustained.. 67
Radical ditto