The Express.
London, England, 1865-11-22 00:00:00

LUGENCE.
)AY.)

CE AND DIVORCE.
ire Ordinary.)
ADAMS.
apinka produced arlCitield
Na proof of the wae's ask
with mita.

JOHNSON.
Geer, the wile of a acalalaird.
married her I. 1846, ikt
doh lasted till 1863, he ,
idiom He had oleo tram

I the custody of one of th.

018 AXD r►unuu,

ker. Be was ea avant yd
Bomereetshire ; end he owned
lived happily with her till ghe
suddenly informed him tau
in au intrigue with her est
'ration ; and a number of y;.
Ins petitioner were put in,
contrition, and bngisyg thu
bit goi and birds.
farmer is the neigh
osto,*
voedent on the 9th .1 July,
DIMOOOdUCt with barn SOL lit
d skid, " Oh, Kra Padheld,fin,
unbend!" Kra. Padfield nit
respondent went away oryto,
r Mr. William, and rommi.
=ea. Her deposition, Irk,*
I, from whiob it aposarad Mat
e state of her eon's health to
than doter:aimed en taxing the

>on the authority of Robbeat
'ahoy) that the admission of a
cleat grounds for the gnat*
bat the dam was wbolli ht.
ed a wish to examine the pit.

'resent the ewe Ina Winne&

IMINAL COURT.
S DAY.)
-•--

row Bramwell)

TESBUILY AND HIS STEWARD.

art, Robert Short Waters, :sts
fteebnry, wee caned upon to ea.
I upon several °bargee of so.
ley, the property of the Belt at

end Mr. Clifferd, Q.C., we
r. M. T. Cole, to Prosecute.

is specially Maud, with Ir.
ace.

II called upon to eurrender,
the court to postpone the trial
ding, at present in progress hr
have been disposed of. He mad
Mr. Barnsley. the solicitor ia
ling all the circumstances that
■e the public, and said that
almost reedy for decides,
it was only reasonable that
of be called upon to Sairlit
Chancray suit. which rer'ly is.
cat issue between the put*
The affidavit also stated that
iota had been employed for many
he accounts, and they bad stated
ugh there were errors in the to.
t in the result there teatild he
1,803/. and upwards in favour of
ion to these facts it appeared that
rn the Chanoety suit for hea-ing on
'Abe stated that in his opinion the
d be expedited by the crimiall
until the Chancery suit was
the matters were proper subjects
of Chancery, and if the claim he
as was urged on behalf of the
of Chancery would no doubt so
would be ruined by the costs he

~ said he could not accede to the
elievei it was only made for the
reminded his lordship that whoa
Kretponement was made one month
the Reorder said if it had bees a
ground had been shown for a pad.
as a criminal cane he should gnat
ould only be upon the understand•
l positively come on. The &few
niry's service in 1863, and his lord.
fern. Rose, Baxter, and NOlka
so aocauctent was also employed to
e,
and it was upon this investigation
I subsequently preferred. He pro.
lotion of his lordship, to put in two
Ir. Hemsley to Mr. Waters, and he
tern whether the Chancery suit was

f this was done he should state a
k Ooze between Mr. Howley and
for to Lord Shaftesbury. This an
i of it, at all eveots, was considered
if those letters were put in he should
se whole of the conversation before

id he thought it was not advisable, U
s 3, that a confidential conversation
nould be made public.
hen proceeded to state that if the
ru acceded to, the criminal trial would
DO pearl.

For three years?
rad an affida% it of a gestlemen in the
ears. Row, Baxter, and Norton. which
6t three yearn at least mast elepee be•
[bury coarse, could be deckled in the

ais rep!y, lei I, so far as the particular
d, the defied int was as ready to wet
uld be ; but the point be had to aril
involved voluminous accounts that
Lag to the e:un.el on the other sides
nvestigate, and that it would be mcat
lent to press do case on, and compel
in the matters that were alleged &Oust
shoald turn out in Chancery that Mr.
al to 5,0001. or 6,000/., there would, ol
the present charge.
said he hid an opinion upon the
would consult his brother 1311 es upon
te same time ietuark, that it defendant
at the present time, he put it WWI
the prosecution wsether he would not
the imputation that the detcadant bed

o then left the court to confer with Mr.
luring his abaente the learned cocoa
conferred earnestly together.
when he retarned, said that Mr. Jo.
1 with him in saying that the aPP'
tponed, act it was now for the cona►d
to decide upon the other question.
said that be bad consulted Lord State&
neitructed him to state that rather than
ed for a moment that the defendant bad
prejudiced, he would consent to the GP'
tponement, and allow the accounts to bc
o was in the right.
rare then made that the trial should WO
April session.

POLICE COURTS-
(THIS DAY.)

XASSIONAIOUSE.
)BBBILY BY • COBTOU•1101:011 Paint.
• respectable looking young nue.beeha 14? ll
I
.sty's Customs, wu charged with s
roperty of • brother clerk.
the assistant solicitorto bet Majestys
id to oondn A the prosecution.
at for a 000siderable time prt moor/ ha
belonging to different clerks i 0 the caroms
are created avery painful frolic ir *ot
meat. On the 13th of October, KG X
who holds an appointment in the Cum*'
office, placed • 51. note and sera sorregns
i on the following day the X Dori was
es were mule. and it was aseertaised Unit
obtained change for the identical 51. rop
se Railway station, and it was 1110"
k would not have riven him oboe

NA that be knew him as a pauwenpr on the railway, so'
go be was clearly ideotified u this perms who bad
he
awed the *Us note. When he wee apprishawda,
that the 54 note had been paid to him in consideration
6 °coming note.
d
Tiosaarec, who made no answer to the oheno, wee
CLEREENWELL.

DOING HOBSITIT AT • corrrx•noutut.--00111IITTAL.
Charlotte Hudson, aged 19, well-droned young woman,
am:gibed as • nesdlewoman, was "loo-greet.
before Mr. Barka
wink steeling from 54, Red Liott-street. Holborn, two
blanket^ value 10s., the property of Mr. James 'ranter. •
odr-housekeeper. She was further charged with stealing
s e'er et boota,f one chain, two locket" sad one petticoat,
tie-property o Mary Connelly, servant in the above house.
The prisoner had lodged in the above house foe three or
Isar eights, and on one °erosion before she had gone the
*Pete from a bed in a adjoining room were mimed.
spin= fell on the prisoner, and on • further search
bang made, the other artiales named in the charge were
rte, The prisoner was found and given into custody,
es she then was wearing the stolen plot She stated
that ohs had pawned the blanket" sad that she was com-
piled to do so through distress.
The prisoner said she was sorry for what she had dons.
So had been away from home shout three weeks, her
lOW being compelled to get rid of her, as the landlord
add there were too many ia family for all to live in one

room
The mother of the prisoner said that her daughter was a
my bad yeses womao. and although everything bad been
des• fm her, it was all without avail. The prison
had
komeaaricted, and been sentiered to 12 months unpri-
...eat, with bard labour in the Hones of Orarrotione for
,eye a man she had lived with.
Berber said it was a moo that would have to go before
toy, but she would wow be remanded for the production
of
the be
of the previous conviction.

lIMIIIIMMN