The Express.
London, England, 1848-07-13 00:00:00

Lord EgiWon's Flatiron ........... ..... ......... Groowsr
Lord dautley's 6tronakdor .............. . .........
51 r. B. Green's Garrick . ........ (Wintainekam
•
Lead Gissouvr's fby Um Provost, d *by &Mos.. ...(d. Halmos 4
MrJones's DuWady ... ............... (Harlon $
- Gk, "ann Ito 2 apt kniaron. Eitbtron

iiiiiii7ifiZri.n -____ A-- - _ __
took the wad, made all the roonisg and WOO tulip by a length; the I
same between wood and Mini R= in sSsee. for 3-
PRoDIXit BWTIFBTAISII of 60 son. each, h ft, yr-
olds. IA tails.
Lord gtinley's Archery Moll 1
Mr. Davice's Red Knight (Wynne :
Mr. Mostyles Lsecadive (Tem&m.n
6 to 4 on Red Knight, end 10 to 6 apt Archesy. Won by tour
lengths. Ran to 2 min. 40 em.
SWEEPSTAKES of 200 son. each, h ft, for 2 and 3-yr-olds.
T.Y.C. (20 auto.)
Lord Eglinton's The Flying Dutchman (Mall 1
Lord Stanley's &Wade (Buller) 2
Lord Glows'. bt by Linen:oat out of Canada .. - . (Holmes II
Mr. Me cby Lanercost out ot Alice liaw.thorn's dam
( real.an) 1
Stol on Flying Dutchman and 6to 1 agst F...mh. Flylog
Merriman wade all the running, and won coolly by a length and a
halt. Run in SO secs.
fiarrom STAKES of 30 son. each, h ft; for 3-yr-old fillies
Eat 11b each. (6 subs.) 1
Sir E. W. Bulkeley's Miss Orbell
Mr. Merry's Avestal
PLATE of 601., for horses that never won 601. ; the second
to rewire 10 sows ,• one mile and • halt ; wee won in three heats by
Mr. 3. Davies'. Idle Bor. beating Mr. Meiklam's (Avondale, Mr.
Douglas's EcesEnda, and Kr. Forester's foSeptdOe.
LATEST CUP BETTINO.-3 to 1 apt CAWIOIIIII, 6 to 1 apt
Executor, 6to 1 opt Plate Charlie, 6 to 1 mist Olen Saddel, 10 to 1
apt Sylvan, 10 to I met Orions" 11 to 1 apt Montgenster. Chanti-
cleer was scratched last night.
DST,—Offers to take 14 to 1 about Elthiron.

ILab3 intelligenct.
EQUITY COURTS.
Before the Lord Chancellor.
HeATH O. CHADNICK.—CIINDITORS' BILL NOT MAIN-
TAINABLE AGAINST A DEBTOR WHO IS ADJUDGED AN
INSOLVENT.—The Lord Chancellor, on taking his seawu
t,
proceeded to give judgment in this ease, which
argued in the end of the year 1846, his lord-
ship first observing that it had quite escaped his
memory until lately reminded of it. The bill was
tiled by the plaintiff on his own behalf and on behalf of all
the other creditors of a defendant who was adjudged an in-
solvent debtor. The bill did not allege the insolvency of
the party, nor put it in issue. A demurrer was filed by the
defendant, Poisons, a purchaser or incumbrancer on the
insolvent's property, fcr want of equity, for multifatiousneu,
and tor- want of parties. It appeared that there was •
meeting of the creditors of the debtor before the billhe bill was
filed, and they resolved not to institute any suit. T
was therefore filed on behalf of creditors, not only without
their authority but against their will. The principal
question, however, was whether a creditor can maintain
such a bill in those circumstances. The acts relating to in
solvent debtors negatived such a supposition, for it was clear
that, if any creditor could institute such a suit, the general
creditors would suffer as being deprived of the advantage of
a general distribution of the insolvers,'s estate under the
more suitable jurisdic of the Insolvent Debtors' Court.
It was not necessary t o into any argument in the matter,
as there were many dectsicns ehowing that such a suit could
not be sustained. His lordship then mentioned, among
other cases, " Yewens v. Robinson" (11 Simon-, 105),
" Hammond v. Attwood" (3 Haddock, 158), " Kaye r. Fos-
broke" (8 Simone, 28), " Major tr. Auckland" (3 Hue, 77),
" Bonfield r. Solomon." (9 ea. 77), and said the demurrer,
for want of equi7, was properly allowed ; it was not
nary to to give any opinion on the multifisriousness or want of
Fa./.91-

WOODS r. WOODS. ENROLMENT OE A DECREE T •
GATED.—His lord-hip gave judgment in this case also,
which was • motion made before him in April, 1847, to
vacate the enrolment of a decree made by Vice-Chancellor
Wigram on the 25th of November, 1846, dismissing the
plaintiff's bill, and also to discharge an order made on the
17th of March, 1847, for the enrolment of the said decree
none pso tune. It appeared that on the day in which the
decree was pronounced the plaintiff's solicitor entered a
caveat against the enrolment of it. The decree was pre-
sented for enrolment on the 16th of February, 1847, and on
i the 17th of March then following, when the 28 days allowed
for the caveat would expire ; the plaintifFs solicitor, meeting
the solicitor of the defendants in the Master's office, on the
taxation of costs, informed him that • petition of appall
against the decree was *resented to the Lord Chancellor,
and the deposit money would be lodged that day. The soli-
citor for the defendants, not regarding whet was so stated to
him, obtained, on the 17th, an order none pro tune for the
the
enrolment. The decree was accordingly enrolled on
18th of March, and the defendants, on the 19th, refused to
accept notice of the petition of rehearing.—His lordship,
after observing that this case, like the former, had escaped
his recollection, until he had been reminded ud he had not
disposed of it, and, &tier going through the eaten and circum-
stances as above, ordered the enrolment to be vacated for

irr:gularity.
ATTORNEY-GENERAL T. MCNRO AND OTHERS.—SCOTCH
KISH IN MANCHESTEIL—These appeals from a decree of
Vice Chancellor Knight Bruce, removing the Rev. Mr.
Munro from officiating u minister of the Scotch kirk in
Manchester, on the ground of his having adopted the doc-
trines and opinions of the free.church patty, and also re-
moving on the same grounds some of the trustees, have been
argued for several days by Mr. Bothell, Mr. J. Russell, and
Mr. Little supporting the decree, and by hlr. Holt, Mr.
Cowling, and Mr. Selwyn for de minister and trustees in
support of their appeal. At the conclusion of the arguments
the Lord Chancellor postponed his judgment.