The Express.
London, England, 1847-02-03 00:00:00

NAVAL.

Woolard', Fa. 2.—TheVrke-ZaZ at-tnapahip. arra bre
y from Grverairbe, wan as We ass bag icon eras dew
rtred'porpose a having ber e4thlad;
her littlop at dna fort.—The arra this Aar=
ing toned the IP raw, 72, fran elm die Ms bra and
for the reception of the onsAnaril. 11101111 a d mai of the bag
Marina is wawa a this Ore, sad eir earn aerwararboa the
Babe be ban dead araMerat.
dinernwrr, 11.--/ty dr Canalises be wenstleg
Oane of Lord Mgt Aftled fd the Vaal ids= of Oar BMW
W bedwai—Wlrearne by ma nit, amid le the 5411 air a as
release lb bib Ilidody, Ms Gorge the Wok retiree an ad
theladir iseduliond the rand pars, harbours, radarede.
rata diem* Wm sad asviorge rivers ht the rafted liaphre.
sad of hie Marra desk* dockyards, arreare, shark restag
or
raw may me for replan rand sea weed for that pm,
e' ps • rlsOm le ea, km time to taw, by order or sabot a
• t c , odor air nereelne bwdq war awl of to otereuiry, se
order a whet pave or pleas midi or awe di or iss=
ark pada larbents, haven, and rook
ads, -orelee. Wm, and earlob, driess as atematilp
oar, irrnpart, a other private a neninn eir wart shad
tower he Wen with, or here on bred them; tundlly qapwass
at gua powder emeanthy let mri xi the lark • Me
abater have deemed r aseaswp sal wpollort„ i peerawee•
a the lahnowearawd MO, air, awl re dm benlesjotederb=
damsel air the with day af Palavety, thearmi
sad ken sarizziooy;.ate uI4 oar, Vannet, or pavan
ar neethmt noel, With ary repree le rata grespared
ta bred,bebre the yart Onrismil. Wall be born'
Wan loath Mt iy the haw pert of the leash. at which pare
the powder nay to embleked. Gam solar ow Made the 25th day
of denary, mu, W. Omani, Jo ger.
Peonorsos.—F. G. Peak to Inerearat.
dreourrinerrs.—An Fs. 2.—G. Mason, lieutenant, Stag
revenue crulaer ; J. P. Parry, naval cadet, Sided—Morey Primal,
do., Albateale.

to the plaintiff. When the vane containing the diamonds
reached Folkestone the captain went on shore in a boat, end
lab.,rded with the diamonds, which were afterwards par-
sitawil by Messrs. Ologg and Martin for 1,7601. This sum
bas paid by a cheque upon the Commercial Bank, and it
was discovered that six of the notes paid by the bank had
been expended in the purchase of the 6001. stock, the sub-
ject of the present application, and wits standing in the name
of the defendant and another. The object was to secure
this portion of the proceeds of the diamonds.—The Vice-
Clkanoellor granted the injunction.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.
ANDRBW3 P. LORD LTNDROBAT —ACTION AOAINST
LOIID CRANCILLOR 7011 RI/PUSINO TO MPS A WRIT OP
Ha Bead CORPUL—This was an action against Lord Lynd-
hurst for having refused to issue a writ of habeas corpus,
returnable before him as Lord High Chancellor, the object
of which was the discharge of the defendant from custody in
the Queen's Prison. The plaintiff. by his declaration,
claimed 5001., as the penalty given by the statute 31 Car. 11.
a. 2 (the Habeas Corpus Act), for such refusal, and recover-
able by an action of debt. The defendant demurred to the
declarati In, and, *long with other objections to it, raised the
following : let. Thai it did not show the plaintiff to have
been in custody on a criminal or supposed criminal charge ;
Ind. That it did not show a motion before the Lord Chan-
senor in proper form ; 3rd. That although it showed the
application to have been made in vacation, it did not show
that it was made before two terms had elapsed, after the
commencement of the plaintiff's imprisonment. Mr. Cow.
him now appeared in support of the demurrer, and contended
that the d. claration did not show the defendant to have had
Jurisdiction to discharge the plaintiff, either in respect of the
maw for which the plaintiff was in custody, or of the mode
in which application was made for his discharge, The plain-
tiff appeared io person to support the declaration ; but, as he
tfessed himself to have been raided by a variance between
numbers prefixed to the sections of the statute la an old
espy of it in his poweraion, and the numbers prefixed to
them in a more recent copy referred to in the defendant's
demurrer, the court gave hem until Monday the Bth inst. to
reconsider his argument.
Nli Prtm.—Betore Mr. Justice fate.
BENI:NTT V. ILL/ITlLL.—Ysiolugn Issue TO TAT vise
11.10/IT TO GOODS lIIIZED I.e EXECtTION.—AII execution
had been put into the houses 39 and 40, Green-street, Orosve-
nor-equare, called the Talbot Hotel, which was kept by a Mrs.
Thompson, the wife ofone Thompson, an ironmonger, in South
Milton-street, at the suit of the defendants, who are wholesale
Ironmongers at Dudley. This was met by a notice from the
parent plaintiff, who was described as the manager of the
Exeter Hall Hotel, and part proprietor of the Duke of Clar•
emu public-house, near the Surrey Theatre, claiming the
gads so his, under a sale which took place eighteen months
before, and it was stated that he had paid 3801. for them.
The execution being withdrawn, this issue was the
result under the Interpleader Act to try the right
to the goods. It was urged for the defence that the
transaction was a collusion, to prevent the creditors of
Thompson obtaining possession of the goods ; and that Ben-
nett was not is a position to advance a sum like that in
question. It appeared also that a quantity of plate belong-
ing to Mrs. Thompson was alleged to have been stolen,
which woo part of the property so sold, and that Bennett
never interested himself in any sups that were taken for
its recovery. The greater portion of the furniture, if not
all. had never been removed from Mrs. Thompson's houses.
—Verdict for the defendant.
Wool, e. HODGSON. COLLISION lIIITWBBN A CAB
AN L. ORNlBus.—This was what is called a " running down
ease." It was so action for SL, for injury done to the
plaintiff's cab by the defendant's omnibus. The usual con-
tradictory evidence was produced, each party Waging a
number of witnesses who deposed to the fact of their own
party b.iug eleariy in the right, and that all the blame was
to be attached to the other.—Verdict for the plaintiff
for 41. 10s.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.
The Sittings at Nisi Prins, after Hilary Term, were com-
menced 'yesterday morning at Westminster before Sir F.
Pollock, C. 8., and Common Juries. Several undefended
and contested muss. were disposed of, but no question of
public interest arose. The entry is a large one, there being
121 causes, of which 32 are for trial by special juries, besides
an crown cases.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER CHAMBER.
Eldinge is Error before lord Met Jostles Wilde, Mr. Barre
Parke, Mr. Baron Alderson, Mr. Justice Mande, Mr. Baron kolfe,
Mr. Berm Ilatt, Mr. Justice Cromwell, mad Mr. Justice V.Vidlieme.
The court resumed its sittings in error yesterday morning,
end proceeded to dispose of geese's Bench errors, heard or
partly discussed at the sittings after the last two terms.
HOWARD IP. SIR WM. 008SETT.—PRIVILIOR OF tea
Horse OF COMMONII.—REVIIRSAL OP THA JODOMINT OF
THE leirran COORT.—The court gen judgment in this
wed known case, the argument fn which, after various
adjournments, was concluded last term. It will be remem-
bered that it was an appeal by Sir Wm. Gossett, the 'trivia-
et-arms of the House of Co the plaintiff in error,
against the decision of the Court at n's Bench, in the
an. of " Howard s. Closeett," in which that court decided
that the House of Common', hem the informality of the
warrant, had no right to lageshos the plaintiff; and that
the deflmdent, Sir Wm. Gosest3 bed saki illegally in taking
Mr. Howard into onelsailosns Part now pre judgment
en the writ of serer, that tie Howe of Commons,
as one of the bigh essis pasimrat, had perfect right
to act in maims alheiss he OUR iptheleges, and was not
bound • to mate as the boo eF the warrant to the
serjeadt-at-arms ell the hemibtles required in a war-
rant 'issued by of lambi Pert. The superior
spurts, of law of TOIgLd emehed this right, and
their lordship wets, diesehre, if *shwa that the Home of
Commons bad ea easel right to hiss sad keep is custody
any pima the berm might asides is be giMy of eon-
tempt. The egisiseros warrant was safilcient
that purpose. laths course of the argument, It had limit
urged fry the mimed b behaiici a: 4 .ifc.l.danl is ince, that
the ommi shwa kpewer by ear branch of the heir
tarpspiMit be ahw tlreei any remedy Ike sea
=i7lt beamed ; but the are was
etaiYe with the in the seperier
courted law. It mils* =dim exercise of the
powerveshi be peeps* iemithat simailasynadse
exereihref eat pewee sew, that the geed seem Oise home
would aired redress es in the praise the IllirriOr
courts The of
aessiailed by remeing the decision
et the Court of Owes% Weds
CAMP/HALL O:7IIII.—VENIRMFACI.AR
Is 240V0 £llll 3511•11 INT ON A DAD VIRDICT.—This Case
was argued he the phistifs in error, at the sitting after last
terawand he the aresna at an extra sitting of the wart at
the-otbamemesmest fit the premnt term.
_lt tn!olves the

question, whether the Court Of Qmina's Inewe has power
to direct • venire hobo Jarman* de Rive, ease seaters has
been passed in a avert of quasi unisme sea • bed verdict
The tuts hue 'tread,. been dila In the Buns. Yes-
terday Kr. Peacoat wee herd et reef it prin.
tiffs in error ; and Kr. Waddington, k the ere we.
At the close of the argument, the lied tucks het4
mated that the wort rook' take roe to carder the ore.