The Express.
London, England, 1853-08-01 00:00:00

FRANCE.

PARIS. SUNDAY EVENING.
The famous Camden solution and three telegraphic
despatches from Vienna supposed to bear upon it, are
thus contemptuously disposed of by the Constitu-
tionnel:

Here is a third despatch, and a third version, received
from Vienna, of what is taking place at Constantinople:
' Vienna, Friday Morning.
"News hu just been received from Constantinople an-
nouncing that the Ottoman government and the representa-
tives of the powers have accepted the project of an arrange-
ment proposed by M. de Bruck, according to which, the
allied fleets are to retire from the Dardanelles and the
Russian troops to evacuate the Principalities simultane-
ously."
This despatch 'comes to us by the private telegraph, like
the two previous despatches which we published yesterday.
We might criticise the terms of it, but we think it would be
waits of time to do so, and for this reason, that we are
enured the terms of arrangement brought by the Carideo
will not be accepted either by the cabinets of Parts or Lon-
don, uneven, as it would appear, by the cabinet of Vienna.
The other morning government organ, the Pays,
has the following milk-and-water article on the same
subject :
The news brought by the Carideo is confirmed, although
in soother form, by the despatch from Vienna. It will be
observed that this despatch, the accuracy of which we must I
net be understood to guarantee, gives explanatione—(very
meagre these explanations)—on the subject of the 'vacua-
don of the Danubian Previous and the retreat of the
Anglo-French fleet. We believe, in fact, that it is to this 1
point that the attention of the governments interested in
the discussion will be most attentively directed. It is Data- 1
ral that the integral performance of the promises contained
in M. de Nesselrode's circular relating to the occupation of
the provinces should be required from Russia. It may not
therefore be impossible that questions of detail or of form I
may have an infieence upon the immediate conclusion of 1
this grave affair, and that powers such as Frames
and England should desire such categorical and
sincere explanations as may be a sure guarantee for
the future. Men's minds, amongst us, have a ten-
dency to precipitation which should be guarded against.
The question hat now for some time been put in the way of
decisive negotiation, bat this negotiationneceasarily implies
dificulties of rations kiods which cannot be solved so
quickly as public imoatieoce would desire.
Now the Conslitutionnel and the Pays, it may be
well to remind you, are one and the same concern,
bat in arranging the division of labour between them
it seems to have been agreed that the one should pre-
pare the public for the possible energetic solution of
the Eastern question, and the other labour to tranquil-
lise the Bourse, and prevent a premature panic.
Thus whenever M. Clranier de Cassagnac, of the
Constitutionnel, sounds the war trumpet, M. de is
Ouerroniere, of the Pays, is certain either the same
or the next day to play an air on the peaceful lute.
This they always do without contradicting each
other as to facts, for their information is the same,
but they systematically argue from identical pre-
mises, the one with a leaning towerds the darkest,
and the other the brightest bid° of the question. The
conventional relative position of the twin papers is
kept up in their Bourse reports, and the introductory
observations to citations from foreign journals. In
the present instance, while the one journal abruptly
announces that the proposed arrangement brought by
the Carodoc is inamissible, and the other mysteriously
hints that it leaves a great many difficult points nn-
provided for, they are perfectly agreed in this —that
nothing is settled. Thus the great fact of last week
is contradicted.

I continue to believe that the announcement I
made a taw days since, of a resolution of the French
and English cabinets to act with energy in ease the
Russian army should not be withdrawn from the Prin-
cipalities within a very short time, was strictly accu-
rate. Thu article in the Sleek, containing the same in-
telligence, has provoked a good many sneers, because
it happened that Lord Cuwley, who was represented
to have communicated despatches from his govern-
ment to M. Drouyn de Lhuys on Wednesday lust, had
not on that day returned from a hasty visit to Eng-
land. It has been rashly inferred from this mistake'
about an unimportant fact, that the whole state-
ment was a fabrication. Lord Cowley was expected,
at Chantilly before ho actually arrived, and it is
more than probable he may have been sent for there,
as the ''leek stated. But whether the despatches in