The Express.
London, England, 1849-12-15 00:00:00

HUNTING APPOINTMENTS.

Her Majesty's stag hounds, Monday, Crown Hotel,
Slough ; Wednesday, Maidenhead Thicket; Friday, Hayes
—ll.
Bad/worth hounds, Monday, Hampole Ina; Thursday,
Kiniston Hill; Saturday, Sarkis Hall—halt-past 10.
Mr. Lumley's hounds, Monday, Jockey House; Thursday,
Park Lane ; Saturday, Sandbank Park—half-past 10.
Bramliam Moor houads, Monday, Hook Moor ; Wednes-
day, Brayton; Friday, The Wild Man; Saturday, Rift—
ing( past 10.
Rufford hounds, Monday, Winkburn • Tuesday, Enlotr-
, stone Village ; Thursday, Luton Village thill-put 10) ;
Friday, Park Hall-11.
Lord Henry Beatinck's hounds, Monday, Longworth
Bridge; Tuesday, Wellingore ; Wednesday, Oats Burton;
Thursday, Norton Place ; Friday, Kettlethorpe; Saturday,
Wecke nloy-11.
Sir T atton Sykes' bounds, Monday, West Heslerta Hill
Top; Wednesday, Stamford Bridge; Friday, Langton Wold
—half-past 10.
Bohai-den hounds, Monday, Cateriek ; Tuesday,
&tea Kennel ; Thursday, Wood Hall ; Friday, Warier
Hall—quarter to 11.
Warwickshire hounds, Monday, Woodcote ; Tuesday,
Whatcote ; Thursday, Lower bhuckbnrgh Village; Satur-
day, Fosnote—halt-put 10.
Snropohirs hounds, Monday, Dorringtoa ; Friday, BR-
linasky—quarter to 11.
Cheshire hounds, Monday, Beeston ; Wednesday, Broom-
lands • Thursday, Cciolmondelq; Saturday, Rayensmoor
put 10.
Mr. Farquharson's hounds, Monday, Holcomb.
Mr. M. Ingram" hounds, Monday, Sudbury • Thursday,
Cation ; Saturday, Shugboough—quarter to 11.
Sir R. Sutton's hounds, Monday, Sarkly ; Tuosday, Bar-
don Hall; Wednesday, Wymeswold ; Thursday, Smeszsby
Inn; Saturday, Warturby Stone Pita.
Duke of Rutland's hounds, Monday, Wiyerton 1100 ;
Tuesday, Great Gdnerby ; Wednesday, Creston Park ; Frt.
day, We Lodge—half-past 10.
Earl Fitswilliam's hounds, Monday, Kennel; Wednesday,
Titctunanh ; Friday, Ashton Wold-10.
Mr. Hillier's hounds, Monday, Legbounm ; Tuesday,
Thimbleby ; Thursday, Burgh on-Bain; Saturday, Green-
tield—halt-piat 10.
Worcestershire hounds, Monday, Cliffey ; Wednesday,
Round Hill; Friday, Witley—halt-past 10.
Mr. A Smith's hounds, Monday, Purton ; Tuesday,
Wood-bridge ; Wednesday, Whirwell Wood ; Thursday,
Vernham Gate; Friday, South Grove; Saturday, Ronne
Court-11.
Duke at Boaufort's hounds, Monday, Cauleot ; W.dnes-
doy, Burton; Thursday, Stoke Park; Saturday, Trouble
House-11.
Suffolk hounds, Monday, Elamwell Lion ; Thursday,
Cockbeld Greyhound ; Saturday, Rigby Tull-gate—quarter
to 11.
Sir W. W. Wynn's hounds, Monday, Bangor ; Wednes-
day, Plea Tag; Friday, Farndon ; Saturday, Aston—half-
past 10.
North Staffordsbir• hounds, Monday, Drayeot ; Wednes-
day, the Three Crowns, Stoke ; Friday, Tunnel—half
past 10.
Brighton harriers, Monday, Patching ; Wednesday, Rare
Course ; Friday, Dyke—quarter to 11.
Crawley and iiOTIMILM hounds, Monday, Pound Hill ;
Wednesday, Burrell Aron; Friday, High limbo, Hand-
mom—quarter to 11.
Monmouthshire hounds, Monday, Penises Plind Toll Bar ;
Thursday, Skenlreith Bridge--hall-put 10.
South Down hounds, Monday, Windon
patt 10._ _

hounds, Tuesday, Uarewood's
past 10.
Ludlow hounds, Tuesday, Norton's Camp-10.

RAW Intelligence.

JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY

COUNClL.—YisrEnusy.

CF.POIIK Tar. Auclll.l.llor or CANS LIIPUST, IHS AS(1101..110E' or
ion, IHIS BISHOP HE LONDON, LUSH LAISODALS, LUSH CASH.-
UM. BAKION NILS-SIIAM. MUMS LtNIDUT Bale., XL.
PLIIBLICIOS Lwtuß, &NU Sla Sill 1116., I.llslllSul

- ----- -- - •
Clonleali v. Tun BI.UOP OP SIZTISS.—INPANT &entail.
Dr. Addams resumed his argument. He bad stated that
Mr. Gorham denied baptism altogether aldose there had been
a prevening act of grace. It was impossible to look at Mr.
Gorkana's book and have a doubt that that was the principle
entertained by Mr. Gorham. Tree bishop said that
baptism held good universally in the cue of in-
tents es opera °pent,. Mr. Gorham's counsel had
said that the bishop had no right to examine
Mr. Gorham out of the articles. The statute of 9 Ed-
ward VI. being declaratory of tho common law, and the
examination of persons presented to benefices belonging to
the church was put in this way. Of the ability of the person
presented to him the examination belongs to the spiritual
Judge. The cases went to this, that whatever was good for
deprivation was good as a refusal to institute ; but they did
not go to the extent that whatever was good as a refusal to
institute would be good to deprive. The real point involved
in this question was the efficacy of the sacrament of baptism,
not merely of infants, but of adults. Originally it was at-
tempted to confine this question to what appeared
in the article, and it was proposed that • clause
should be introduced into • bid which should
distinctly provide that no doctrine should be con-
sidered unsound, except on the articles themselves.
That bill had not passed. It was now said, let us are how
matters stand on the articles. The articles were expressed
and determined as to the doctrine maintained by the Bishop
of Exeter. The articles, no doubt, must be dated from
1671. In 1662 there were also articles of the Church of
England, but it was singular that, as far as this sacrament
of baptism was concerned, the articles had undergone no
alteration from the very commencement of the reformation.
The doctrine in the artic:es relative to the sacrament
of baptism was precisely the same with the new
articles of the Church of England as finally settled
in 1671. The articles were generally supposed to have
been drawn up very recently. This was laid down at length in
Archbishop Lawrence's books, but another sour.e, or more
immediate source, bad been discovered,wbich was mentioned
by Jenkins in his Life of Cranmer. They had undergone
frequent additions from Crammer, in Cranmer's own hand-
writing. In page 273 it was said, " infante*, per baptismam,
consequantur remissionem peccatorum. Spiritus Sancti est
in infontibus efflux." The Latin of these articles might be
referred to by way of i xplaining whatever there was of am-
biguity in the English articles. Baptisms propitia est sign=
regeaerationis. Vi divina, regenerationie, gratis au-
getur. Baptirma pervaloturs omnino optima. He
must repeat what he had said in the court below,
that for the first 50 years after the first institution of
Christianity, there was no whisper, doubt, or suspicion of
baptism and regeneration being, in fact, convertible terms ;
that regeneration was baptism and baptism was regenera-
tion. Commencing with Ireowut, who was a disciple of
another who was a disciple of St. John (and they could not
go much further back than that), he spoke indifferently of
infants who were reg ted, meaning baptised. Until the
commencement of the Reformation such a doctrine was never
dreamt of as to disconnect the sacrament of baptism from
regeneration. He stated that without any hesitation as
• positive fact. It would be • waste of time
to cite authorities on the point. In " Bingham's
Ecclesiastical Antiquities " baptism was called " indulgentla
regeneratio," or the sacrament of faith. Reference had been
made to two canons, from which it had been contended that
this question whether regeneration was universally attendant
on baptism was or was not an open question until the Connell
of Trent, and this upon a supposed letter of Innocent IV.
and a decree of the Council of 'Vienna in 1311, which wee
inserted in the canon law. These had nothing to do with
the question whether regeneration was or was not univer-
sally attendant on baptism. It was said, " a plerisque non
conceditur absolutio, alteris seserentibus parvulis quidem
culpam remitti, sod gratiam non referri." In the year 1842 a
Bishop of London delivered a charge to bis clergy, in which
he sail the opinion which denies baptismal regeneration
may possibly, though not without great difficulty, be re-
conciled with the language of the twenty-seven Articles ;
but by no strength of ingenuity, no latitude of in-
terpretation, could it be brought to agree with the plain
anqualitisd language of the offices for baptism and confirm-
: ation. A question might properly be raised as to the sense
in which the term regeneration was used by the early
church, and by oar own reformers. That was quite a dif-
trent question. But that regeneration did take place in
baptism was most undoubtedly the doctrine of the English
, church. He did not understand how any clergyman who
; used the office of baptism could deny that baptism
I was regeneration. Value this was the doctrine
of the church of England, the church was departing from
the principle on which it had proceeded in every other in-
stance. Bishop Parker, in the Eccksia Anglicano, stated a
canon of the convocation of 1571, being the very year in
which the articles were first perfected, and authorised by
act of parliament. Could any one lay that the catholic
father, did not collect from the Old Testament the doctrine
tof baptismal regeneration 1 It was impassible to dispute the
fact. All that their lordships had heard was, that this was
an opoestion 'until the assembling of 'the council of
Trent. Having given this canon of 1571, he com-

scented upon it in this way—he said it was a
regulation framed with excellent judgment, and worded
with exactest caution. The canon did not order that they
should teach whatever had been taught by the fathers ; that
would have been setting up new rules of faith ; nor did it
say whatsoever the fathers had collected from the Scrip-
' tura, for that would bays been making Atm infallible in-
terpreters. In Laud there wee a dialogue between a catho-
lic and a protestant, in which it was said that infants ought
to be baptised was plain and significant front Scripture, but
if there were no salvation for infants but by bniusni, then,
out of all doubt, the consequence was most evident, teat in-
fants were to be baptised for their salvation. Upon all
these authorities this was the universal doctrine of the
_ .

antrel;:Caless the first reformers in this instance departed
from the principle on which they. proceeded in other
instances, this must be the true interpretation. Much
stress hid been laid on the authority of Bishop Jewel.
There was a famous challenge of bishop Jewel, who chal-
lenged • Romanist to produce single positive testimony,
from the writings of any of the fathers GOO years after Christ,
in favour of any tenet which the Rumens held, where the
church of England differed from the church of Ronne. Sup-
pose the challenge had been accepted, on all points Jewel
would have been successful—on the unity of the church, in
the person of the bishop of Rome, the doctrine of purgatory,
the transubstantiation, and communion in one kind or
another. Would the challenge have been accepted
by the Romanists on any of these points? Sup-
posing there had been a reel difference between
baptism and the efficacy of baptismal regeneration,
how would Jewel have argued then ? Would he have
gained his challenge ? There could be no doubt that the
meaning oftrro reformers wee to assert baptismal regenera-
tion. There was another test—the views of the eminent

t neon by whom these articles were principally 1 amid.
It was important to see what the sentiments of Creamer
were upon the subject. Creamer was, from the tint, for
the doctrine which he (Dr. Addams) maintained. There
wee the series of Dampton lectures published by Archbishop
Laurence in 1804. Some attempt had been made to impugn
Me authority of Laurence upon the subject, but he was the
mare inclined to agree with an eminent person who had
said, that the lectures were no only of the highest
authority, but remarkably perspicuous and satisfactory, and
did, in fact, contain all that could be said in illustration of
this particular subject. Toe opinions of the reformers were
at this time particularly Luthtrzn, and although Crammer
changed teem on one single point, in other rupees they
remained unaltered. Under his eirection, and with his in-
dividual aid, were prepared the offices of our church and the
articles of our creed. Cranmer was originally a catholic;
he was then a Lutheran. The whole authority on the other
side proceeded on a lane assumption, viz., treat b.cause a
person was a Calvinist, therefore he denied the etc,ritte of
baptismal regeneration. It was clear that Cranmer, when
be translated the catechism, in which the doctrine is pre-
cistly laid down, expressed the same opinion on the sacrament
of baptism which he all along maintained. Cranmer said
we have fellowship with Christ, when we are made flesh of
his flesh, bone of his bones, and BO we are united by the com-

munion of baptism ; we are made so in perfect uuiva ; but
we are made also so by baptism, and the unity in baptism is
perfect, and the doctrine is not to be suffered in the church
which teacheth that we are not joined w church by baptism.

It appeared to him also that there was another conitib
These articles were either positive or they were negative.
The positive articles were those articles which affirmed points
of doctrine, either affirmed or directly deduced :rout scrip-
ture, but the negative articles were framed for that purpose;
they were framed to refute vile re the thing which was
affirmed by the Romans was neither affirmed or directly
deduced from scripture ; he meant all those articles connected
with the 19th, which were affirmed particularly by way of
refuting the errors of the church of Rome. Then we cams
to the 19th article, such as the doctrine of purgatery,worship
of images, of the Virgin Mary, transubstantiation. It this
was so, if this notion of the sacrament of baptism was erro-
neous, and was a doctrine from which the protestunts were
inclined to differ—nay, more, was net acriptursl—how came
it there was no article to contradict the doctrines of the
church of Biome on these vital mitten? The doctrine of the
council of Trent on the subject of baptism was pro-
, pout:tiled in 1547, but no sooner had it been fixed by the
Council of Trent, than a learned foreigner
came to this country, sod endeavoured to put a
stop to the doctrines which the Romans were trying to pro-
mulgate. The authority of Dr. Jackson, who wrote at the
close of the 16:h and the beginning of the 17th century,
was, that infants are by harism regenerated we may not
deny, unless we will take upon us to put 'nether sense
upon the articles than they orig'nally bore. Utile.e they
put an unnatural sense upon the ar ides, it was impossible
to deny that they warted that infants were regenerated by
baptism. This was confined to the articles themselves.
Whateaietßishop Stidinefleet in his Ecclesiastical Cases ? lie
said, the sense of the church is best known by
public acts, as by sacraments, prayer, and creeds. Corny-
bear, in his sermon en the subscription, said the prevision
' set forte in many of our articles s ught to be undo rstood in
such a sense ha is incensistent with any other. The church
could not be supposed to intend one thing in some of her
acts and the direct contrary ice others. lie conceived that
if there was any doubt on the articles as they stood, we were
not only to resort to the Latin, hut he found that Mr.
' Gorham himself was not at all disinclined to t' ail himself
of that means of explaining the articles when he thought
he could do so ter his oe n benefit. The whole
(Aces of the church were strietly dogmatical, and nohody
could dispute them to be dogmatical. The Mil a, of public
baptism, private haptinn, adult baptism, the office of confir-
mation, were drawn up upon priaciples which were
utterly inconsistent with the supposition that it was
the doctrine of the church of England to state that ri gene-
ration and the sacrament of baptism were not indissolubly
connected with etch other. The necessi'y of baidins to
salvation was declared in terms in our Lord's disco:tree with
Nicodeinue. It was said, " Except a man he born of water
and the spirit, lie cannot enter into the kingdom of God."
In Waterman's review of the doctrine of the Eucharist, it
was said, "then is great use and efficacy in the sacrament
even where the recipient rhvforms no part, as in the case of
an intent receiving baptism." Burnet said, "the fairest
indication of the sense of the church is to be taken from
her language in her public offices. Thus, that which
she speaks the most frequently and most publicly,
even the Articles, are not so much nor so often read as the
Liturgy, sod much of this way of reasoning has b t it made
use of as to the church of Rome to make her accountable."
It might be used stronger in our nee. That was not the
only passage in Burnet in which he had relieved to this
mode of explaining the article., but particularly at the con-
elusion of the 17th article—the article " Predestination,"—
he had stated it, end given a particular illustration of it.
'f he estechism was to be considered as the most solemn ex.
pension of the sense of the church, since that was the doc-
trine in which she instructed all her children. Nvt only
was this the rational way of considering the subject, but ft
had been so considered. In 1710 the clergy of the lower
house assembled in convocation and reassembled at the
Archbishop of Canterbury's, and declared that a certain
book had been published directly opposed to the funda-
mental articles of the Christian religion. This was against
Bishop Whistnn. Four years afterwards there was a
similar proceeding of convocation as to Dr. Clarke. It was
declared," Whereas there ate divers passages in the book of
Common Prayer, which are directly opposed to such hereti-
cal assertions." With respect to the articles themselves, it
was lot his intention to trouble the court with reading
them, because it seemed to he admitted that in their plain
common sense, these offices, according to their mature im-
port, did contain the doctrine of baptismal regeneration. This
was stated at very great length, and with great particularity,
in the Hampton Lectures of Archbishop Lawrence. lie went
with great particularity into these articles of faith of the
church of England, in which it was contended that the doc-
trine of the church of England was calvinistic. " Vere in en-
clesia recipiunter infante.. Hoc infante' ease partena ecclesite
at placers Deo. Certum hoc es Deum in cos efficatum ease."
In a canon of 1604, the doctrine of the church on the subject
of baptism was distinctly laid down. Not the sliehtest refer-
ence had been nude on the other aide to the Savoy conference,
or to the Back of Common Prayer established by Charles
11. It was utterly impossible that Mr. Gorham 's doctrine
should be sound, that he should admit the authority
of the rubric, and conform to all the rubric, and yet insist
that baptism and regeneration were not convertible terms;,
and it did not follow that a child must be regencreted. In
the argument in the court below it was insisted on that these
offices were submitted to the revision of Peter Martyn and
Bucer. and that Bucer especially had not expressed any die-
satisfaction, and it was impossible he could have sanctioned
the articles being drawn up in their present form unless he
I had meant them to be understood hypothetically ; and this
plainly resulted from the fact that Archbishop Lawrence proved
that these offices were fairly borrowed from a form which was
drawn up by Bucer for the use of the famous Archbishop of Co.'
lope in 1536. St. Austin had been supposed to maintain
that infant communion was as necessary to life eternal as
infant baptism ; but St. Austin had never directly in terms
said that baptised infants could not be saved without com-
munion. Bishop Davenant, who was Professor of Divinity
at Cambridge, in 1609 and 1621, said that the guilt of origi-
nal sin was removed to all intents from bell when un-
posed, and consequently that there was a sense in which
they might be called regenerated, justified, and sanctified.
If they received it secundum motum recipientia they were
plate din a state of salvation. It was called justiticatio,
regeneratio adoptio. Ward succeeded Davenant as professor
at Cambridge, and he went beyond Davenant himself. He
did not say the sacrament coolers grace absolutely on every
receiver. The conferring grace by baptism must be condi-
tional and depend upon certain laws. There ware two ways
in which a recipient put a bar on the sacrament, either by
commission of an offence or omission of a bounden duty.
Infants could not impose a bar, and therefore it was said
that on them the sacrament infallibly conferred grace. As
infants placed no bar on baptism, the law conferred the first
measure of grace, vex , the forgiveness of original sin. If
b grim was only a sign of grace, it did not confer it ; nothing
was given to them who died in infancy. In another passage
he said that all baptised infants were undoubtedly justi..ed.
Dr. Addams was about to cite some further authorities,
when, it being now 4 o'clock,
Lsrd Campbell asked if he wished to suspend his argu-
ment for a time, and if he was likely to conclude in one
hour or two ?
Dr. Addams observed that he had still a most important
part of the case to consider. The Savoy conference had not
bees alluded to. It might take some time.
Lord Campbell asked it Mr. Baddeley's argument would
take much time ?
Mr. Baddeley said that his own impression was that he
should not occupy more than one day: He would do ad he
could to shorten the argument in Justice to himself as well as
justice to the couch
Lord Langdale, addressing Dr. Addams, said that if he
thought it probable that he would conclude in two hours,
1111,1 Mr. Baddeley, on the best celculetion, thought it pro-
bable that he would take a day, the court would adjourn tiU
Monday and Tuesday next.
Lord Campbell—On that day we may sit till 5 o'clock, and
on Tuesday as late as may be necessary.

THE EXPRESS, SATURDAY EVENTh
4
His Henan held that he could not be examined till the diction in the statement of the little girl, the sister of the pyi,g„ g,
deceased.
EQUITY COURTS.-Yseninsw. qui stion of surrender was decided.
Neoax rue Lone Cstaircenea. Mr. Hillary submitted that no can of inability to sue- Mr. P.olesck delivered an able address to the jury in the
hunt Co,
Tien Arrenunnr Onexnee v. nes MAYOR AND Couto- surende
The leaned judge very carefully summed up.
reader was made out. There was not everndannelateels. cent- priemer • defence.
Salmis or Locums Ass OTIS BSC-Rion? To YRS SOIL, gems, wheat mei,. easily have bean ob.. from
ifirssea!
Bra. ARO BMOCS OF TVS unsa Telexes arrireasi Mote at B ,alocaa it there bed been any pretence for it. pas. The jury retired, and had not returned into court when Court
Itoutar ti
Ann Low-eaten UAIII/1.-AIMWES.-PRODUCTIoN OF eroduet an been tall of design and fraud, and there was no our desps:ch lett.
aelmaini
Denestarin. imed,
ground for believing that be was now disposemodytshi•mssalareaathutell
per=raberi: thi im.
wig.
Ire . "11
la
6P-
discrdlii:gli hie
"4
if'altrosaTlh Icelenden MIDDLESEX SESSIONS.-Yinnishmw. amerce
ea se of the Mann dentin pec es cadet t• p , _
THI BITTINOII AT WINITIIIIMTIM. Tenses H
live ws/ot end cerree'f= tad tore clerk to glebe feller at Guildhall instientedat II at
swam in respect to charters and other 11/MlLMents edmit the indite" bad alma, "pa a
by orderd of
72,(cr'deriert,tearn.edfieldwalhesicbd The
situ or
this
wars
for
the swine
year
Ea,.
bees
..,...
by them, at so to be evidence of their own title, and was about 4AL); and which was now just on tee are of fixed
and • cosamittee of magistrates appohind for that pus. ,n 770 AT 1
Set Inineend to the HIM et the crown. The data of the trial. To accept his surrender under niche
hahhcircutenstans t
woes. Panto
th,esittianddsielaPtowtteensitmalinstentetir,en hem bow' made in referee= Necklet
hy adjournment from Clerk- sad Jan
dispute arose in this way. The mayor end esepeation of would bona mat dangerous pr
this
Th
Leaden, in the yeas 1843, gusted swum or team teams- now In a is, and only resorts& to et:tithe:rove to extricai him- 'swell. The periodicallyou by a menial in an aet of Loadoll.
have this man ex. parliament to sit at the Westminster Guildhall hadagli
rat peaces, who are also defendants In the mese, to raise tam The c.a.rs would mash.
g to other storithrobers for the purpose of holding •a **Westminster Session," bat it Wetteern
,
anblakre.wilaasilsela te.antlegiffereralara a laps•lseeaf the river.
11
the Psaad aad Paniseed, aa a auralla the tat 'ht r - ill • mere formality, there not being (except when cages are :ill'.
Mr. --...•t, ..... ---or,- -ray a -Mi., I. --- part of thaa mats sup patty dividend w +s tern wig p
specially adjourned from Cl.kenwitll I above one Cu. for urnaws
MOW between high and low water miuk oppesits the Isle of Asp.
Denes be other in that Part of the river by Moiety- ler. Lunatics said the new act had supplied an import- trial in six of such sittings, but nevertheless a; full panel of at 12, •
ladle rod toothers is that part of the river by Battens& ant deficiency la the former bankrupt law, bygiving hie grand and petit Juan had to be summoned, an expellee of Bristol.
at Buis
Tomes parties havinf commenced the work of embank- Honcur the discretion of accepting a bankrupt's surrender nearly 8001. a year being entailed upon the county by each Teases S
Mete the dtterselmesersi Sled the intornmadomteentoteh at any time. The present oppantion was evidently made, proceedings. Four only of these sittings, half the usual aroma
Indictment than to the number, nave been appointed for 1850, an alteration by tease 'tie
Jan. 11
ibilaweemeisi'atitsoilhe Mad
Yarlb, semi areadwPteat"the 'exisistatiat. 1 thatlll Pei-C. ingarerinwriathof athve4wcrelitothne uPqnsinedristghe. estate. as unhesitat. which mush inconvenience and expense will be avoided.
tßaltb,
nties, creels, cad naripble Avers, and the shores and ingly declared that the French authorities bad been induced street.
blab& thereof, between high and low water marks, belonged by Wee representations, to give this man up. Were the
TSB POLICE CoURTS. EUWAILD
to Mr If eieet7 la tight of the cm", i that the atay= and baeknin Row allowed to surrender, he was ready to be ex- mitten
masenstioa of London had, either by prescription or grant anima at awn. -- aorta
from the I
keg exercised the of of bailiff or eon. Ills Mower said the bankrupt law almost from the be- MANSION HOUSE.
senate, ortwksalllsames from Staines to Yentlet Creek to- ginning had maga non.surrendcr as a very great offence, AN INDUSTRIOUS MINDICANT.-Georg TIONAI
te
e Troyer, a meet
wards the end it wee their duty to prevent the erection and formerly it was Liebe* to the punishmeut of death. It notorious mendicant and impostor, was brought before Alder- at Gm
of all otetressiime to navigation and other nuisances had base reduced to transportation for sewn years, one man Carden. He wore • dal night cap, and wee in every j". A
on the river, but they bed not acquired any as object of the redaction of the punist.ment being to remove respect dressed for th • cbseacter which he has been pitying any Ti
tate or intense in the bed, soil, or shores of the the objection to prosecution in such cams. This being w.,
.-- for many years with extraordinary success in and round the Witute
liver, yet, re
sod
ha they claimed of late to be esti- the court oneht net, at the same time, to relax its discretion metropolis. rid., i
tied thereto, sod had when upon thastellete to make grants in dealing with these cues. On looking back to the pr: c- Mr. F. M. Beresford, of Halfmoonstrest, Piccadilly, WV;I2,A4
to parties el yearns or leads on the banks of the tin of the court in former times, lie found that it was said the prisoner, whom he knew to be a consummate beg- uTeri
rim • to Berme them Of embank the same end build very strict. Nothing but i leasable mistake, or unavadable
gar met him in Bartholomew-lane, and solicited charity 12 o ion
therein Wean high and low water marks. The informs- misfortune, had over been held to excuse nonsumnder. a mast pressing manner. There ww,
no
officer in
thenegh.
.Lbam
so
tile, after stating the several gnats above me
Formerly, when the assignees opposed an •application to RIF- banrhood at the moment, Or to time would have been biotin Deo.lane-
I
that such te were acroaclusente on the rights of the render, the order was never made; and this rule had been introducing the beggar to the Alderman, and Mr. Geodman,
wows, and that the embankments and eremites wen detri- first broken in upon in the case of Childs. Subsequently the chief clerk, to both of whom he was well known, and the feeeet
mental to the river and nuisances to her Majesty's subjects these olden had been more easily obtained ; one reason, witness was satisfied with giving him peremptory notice to Ta:,s
navigating the same. The information prayed that the rights probably, being that after the order for leave to surrender leave the place. The prisoner disappeared with theatrical wine
of her Majesty might be eacertained and protected, and that nu made by the court above, the commissioners had still a promptitude down one of the turnings into a certain taproom Weds
lee that purpose imitsc to lee
tried at law, might be directed discretion as to receiving the surrender. In his own court mien, until he thouabt his monitor had departed nom the Sawa,
U neeseary, and that if the rights claimed by the mayor and there was • precedent: a trader had absconded, carrying vicinity of the Stock Exchange. He then emerged from hie and U
=Mont= should he found void, then an injactioe might oti a considerable sum to the Cape ; retuning, he obtained place of refuge, and resumed his old occupation with in. 3'3E121
be grunted le =ra* farther Wenn mod enthmehmtento. an order from the Court of Review, bat he (the Commis- armed assiduity, and it struck Mr. Berieford that the hint .',,717.,,
sad that Oa •=beahleeate alin,q Meld might be efelel), la the mends* of Ida d "'elk°. "feu" to *et e7'e whith had been given would not be of any permanent effect rd ; I
lasted. ito. Tee wept:wades ans the town clerk it. This wee nuch the cue of Nano, who had abeeonded upon so hardy a veteran in the art. Accordingly the gen- pooh
lowa/ downtrod to Porn of the Inforemagoo, Weft/ le Boulogne ; and the greater the facility in committing an llamas once more presented himself, end wee once more Chows
cm tee ground of jurisdicties, end put in answen to that offence, to greater should be the punishment. The solicited with great earnestness. An officer having then lith. 0
Put milefflolf the arabeaftrallda to be abetrettiene to the facilities for abnonding were now great, as was the dial- caught a glimpse of the fellow seized him. tOr
navigation and nsisanCes, denying that they Were such. alley of obtaining proper y from parties who so absconded;°mow,
Alderman Carden-Did be carry anything apparently for .. 4,
The Master of the Rolls, on the heating of the demurrer, it was, therefor*, meet important that the court should sale, as • blind to his real character ? tone i
overruled it, and his decisions thereon was affirmed on appeal strictly enforce the law. Hers the act of bankruptcy was Mr. Bereaford-He carried a weal or two, although he se. 7,
to the Home of Lords. (See 8 Bann, 270; 14 Law Jan
' going to Boulogne, evidently • wilful act, and one which is so clever as to be, as I understand, the permanent chair- West
nal, 305 ; and 1 House of Lords cases, 440.) must delay his creditors. In his petition he alleged illness, man of a begging club. I have reason to know that although Dm
Tee mayor and corporation sad town clerk then put in of which the,. was no medical certificate • and eves, unless he is hers in the genuine habiliments of b-ggary, he :drums buckle!
Mown to the information, elating, among other elaffe. in the ease of very serious illness, this need not have pre- in the evening in a impectabs suit of black. bailees
that they wen possessed of charters, grants, and documents vented his retuning iron Boulogne-a short journey now of Alderman-To take the chair at his club, no doubt. ;_-•lenne
whisk constituted their title to the bed and honks of the about six hours. There was noteing which could be inter• Well, he must act by deputy for some time at any rate. =
river, end to greet the lessee or licenses to the other de- wend into mistake or unavoidable misfortune. Criminal (Laughter.) Bland
hedente. Esmptioas were taken to the answers for insufil• proceedings having been instituted, it was beet that the wart
May, sad allowed by the Master, whom decision there= should do nothing, either to preiudice the party amused, or a inns
City:license (470)-I have been trying to catch him for mama
of time, but the moment he sets any of the police he cm
WM esslemed
.1.17 the order of the Master of the Rolls. to plum him in the position of having purged his offence. aa'hiniia a for pintas.
Et. Nu. Reldishi Idefewither (the town clerk), Then WM no ease of surrender being taken after actual Several of the officers said the prisoner had been convicted rm.
all Mi. were heard in support of the appeal. and prosecution; and in one case in 2 Veiny, the Chaneeltor of mendicancy at least 30 times, and that his skill teemed to l'etto
eselllmllea IBM tie answers of the defendants were sufficient, refused to interfere, although the prosecution had been in- inane,* with hie ra"ivity. Lenin
aretbot ma Was bound 02 produce for the in rection of stinted after the first steps were taken towards the saran- Mr. Bereafoed ma that an inexperienced person would be (e-t°,l.„,'
his Iseaments which constituted the foundation der. This Was not • case in which the court would interfere unable to resist the temptation to give something to so „al;
illi *e onion of his own title, and in which the antagonist at ell ; the petitioner was sot entitled to the relief he prayed. miserable an object as the prisoner was capable of making cloths
had no Lawn* Fo, this position numerous casts were It was not such a ease as that in which the Lord Chan- himself appear to be. Its had the power of drawing a Harri
elm&"lklrr, liftlir emivieti°°* would, is the exercise of 114 "cf.' long face that was enough to break ay one's heart. cur
The lisiloffier-Oateral &Ed Mr. Mauls, for the crown, sup- tioe, reetimaeada pardon. (Laughter.)
ported tom wake Mthe Water of the Rolls, and wounded
The prisoner said the public were quite nrietakee about him. Del
that tomdaminni% after admitting their Osumi" of de"' INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT.-Yurzanslr. He did not know what ens meant by saying that be was C. Ar
mesa soled tee by the Information, were bound to produce Eames Tea Quo Comussenisa. clioirsnan of a club, or that he dressed in black. He sup- el
them. TIM woe the ordinary practice, and tharows asked IN Rim Morns or ELIZA A. PA222.1•LA811i11112.-A ported himself ever since he bad lost his situation as clerk to lime
se mere then wee anal between subject and subject.
Mr. BOW as bead le reply. HARD Cass? a stockbroker by selling trifling matters to the gentlemen of E. y,
The orgesseas aimpled several days. This insolvent, a young woman, who had been nearly ail the Stock Exchange, and he was salting to speak to Sir Moses cER.
The Lord Cheneeller said he would eadeavour to dispose manila
._ in Whit-sema-itts".._, ._prilon:co'dnap.pl.ied to he discharged. Maunders when the complainant gave him into custody.
M the amt on Monday. Her tabu on me enema Ea 5e5001., but her own Anything pro or con he had never uttered; but he believed Dr
-- debts were under 201., the remainder being liabilities for •• he was born to be eternally incarcerated by some villainy or N. C
COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.-YESTERDAT. brother in•law. She was now only 22, and on coming of other. trick
lanTlia• AT Nis raius AT GultaliALL age had executed mortgages on the property to which she Alderman Carden.-I shall remand you till Monday., in 9.e"
The ter heard tiedey wire of no public interest. was entitled nadir her lather's will, including her share in order that the convictions at the instance of the Mendicity ~.„'",7,,
Golden-lane burial ground. Society may be brought against you, and then I shall send a-,,,„,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.-YESVERDAT. The Chief Commissioner remarked that it was a me- you to fill the chair in Bridewell for 'three months. hoc'
hernias AT lee Pasts AT GattalULl.-Blatla Loan clue, lancholy ease of liabilities of a young woman denuding GUILDHALL. won
JCWICI WILDS AVM A beat lAL Jeer. herself of her property to relieve some members of her ta- n
...MAROS OP WILFULLY UTTERING A FORGED CHICII7I.- CEN
lim.ootr r. Tux esscunienors Or CANTSSBURY AND wily. He regretted her leng imprisonment. George Clamp, of No. 4, Flask-row, Ebury-squire, Pimlico,
.13,-;
Tax. A creditor, named Marshall, who claimed 381. for cigars wee again placed at the bar, charged with uttering a cheque E.
Mr. Seejetnt Byla and Mr. Peacock were weasel for supplied to the brother in-law, asked • few questions. He for 4905, at Mears. Child and Co, the bankers, well know- inn.,
the plaintiff, and Sr. F. Tahiger and Mr. Tomlinson re• thought it a very hard case on the young lady, as he be.
presented the defendants. laved her property would pay all the debts. lie wished to lag the same to be a forgery F. .
A gentleman from the office of Mears. Pickering and Co. P. A
The plaintiff was the Rev. Dr. Hilent, who had been know what had become of the brother-in-law 1 append to conduct the case on behalf of Maas. Child tin's
formerly the proprietor and likewise the incumbent of a Mr. Dowse, who supported the insolvent, replied that he Oa ti
proprietary chapel in Liverpool, known by the name or was now an inmate of Whitecrosestrest Prison. and Co.
St. Matthew's, and the action was brought to recover for In !answer to a question, it wee stated that thenrr-in- It will be recollected that the prisoner presented a cheque .ar3l
for the above amount on the 6th init., purporting to be 'met
the injury he had suffered by reason of the church and the law Was " nothing ;" he had been inn* trade. A examine- drawn by a Mr. Temple, of Park-lane, solicitor, but it was i,,,T,
land being taken by the Liverpool and Bury Rail- don took place respecting. a legacy tae insolvent had re, instantly detected to be • forgery. At the last examination coy
way Company. It appeared that at the time the aired since she had been in prison•
sanction et parliament was about to be given His Honour ordered her to be discharged forthwith, in identified a cheque for 201. which he bad given a few days be•
there was some mystery about the cue, for Mr. Temple lee Hos
to the miiitev the pleictiff attended by counsel Won the doing which he commiserated the condition in which she
committee of tie SWUM of Commons, and the result was had pieced herself and her long imprisonment by "her fore, and repudiated that for 4901., although, as the alderman „,O%
said, they were both evidently the handwriting of the same sale
that the 10th section of the 91 and 10 hof Victoria, cap'. hangs a;,;„,.-: 7.s.tere." person, and what made it still more strange was that those T. '
312, provided that nothing in the act contained should em- Discharged accordingly. two cheques were not like any of the other cheques which tare
,
power the company to take down or interfere with the - Mr. Temple used to send to the hank. Po
church or the proper performance of divine tunic* is it, et Mr. Temple and Mr. T. C. Coyle, to the latter of whom .141
with the yard or ground attached to it, and the buildings ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. the cheque for 201. had been passed, were both examined at Ld
erected en part of the said ground, or with the passage considerable length, but were unable to suggest an gaols-
leadirg from the church or chapel in Key-rnet to Luna- NORTHERN CIRCUIT.-Yoss, DEC. 13. nation of the mode in which the forgery had been effected.
tier-strut, without the consent, in writing, of the Bishop Swam Ma. Ausricc Cautram. Tri
The prisoner, who received an excellent character, and t
of Chester (ncw the Archbishop et Canterbury), and the MURDER AT KROITINOLET. who evidently had been used merely as a tool in the hands of pi;
payment 02 the said Archbehop of Yoik and Bishop of Benjamin Ileald, 24, was charged with the wilful murder the individual who concocted the attempted fraud, was din d
Chester of such ruins as should be agreed upon by them, of William Heald and Elisabeth Heald, at Knottingley, on charged, upon his undertaking to give all the insistence in Us
in ascertaining which regard should be had by the said the 13th of July last. his power to discover the really guilty parties. 8
archbishop and bishop to the erection of a new church The grand jury ignored the bill against the prisoner, and MARYLEBONE. DA
and enclosing the same with iron railings or other proper he was sow placed upon his trial on the asroaer's inquisition. CAUTION TO DRAYMIN I
.-Frederick Roberts, a (trepan, at
enclosures, and fitting up the same with oil things neves. Mr. Blanchard, who append for the prosecution, briefly attended on a summons obtained against him by Inspector i
wry fur the perkasuisc• of divine worship, capable of stated the ease. 'no wiener, his father, mother, and bro- Champneys, (under the Metropolitan Police Act,) for having
accommodating seven hundred and thirty persona at the least, Mir, aid the two deceased, who were the children of the unlawfully ridden on one of the shafts of the dray of which
and regard was to be had also to the value of such parts of brother, raided together at Knottingky, near Pontefract he had the care, without having in his hands the reins while
the premises as did not form the site of the church and the Two or three menthe previous to the commission of the driving.
health. g thereon. The mid archbishop and bishop were an e offence the prisoner met with accident to his spine, and The case was proved, sad the magistrate, after cautioniag
also, if they thought fit to purchase the plaintiff 's intermit he was prevented from followiog his daily occupation for defendant (who expressed his regret for what he had done),
in the pew rents beyond the sum of ninety-five pounds a several weeks. His miad became much depressed, fined him in the mitigated penalty of 6s. and costs.
year, which amount was reserved for the church or clerk bet he so fa recovered as to be able to resume John Walker was summered for a similar offence and the hr
sad seas& f...e the benefit of the incumbent of ties said week, and he obtained employment upon • rail- )lac peachy waa inflicted Blom iatad bin. in
intended now church. The 11th section of the act way, where he remained for some time, but he r- ,
enacted, that upon pay met of the said sum to be agreed 21111 spin compelled adesist from work. He then - ti
upon the church and the churchyard, with the other showed signs of insanity, and on the 13th of July, waist PUBLIC! SALIM vi
ground sad building thereon, and the freehold thereof, the father of the two deceased was &beat, the prisoner went em
should nest in the mid railway comply, and that the with the children into a garden, situated at a short distance DEC. 14.-By Mr. G 20802 881 TH, at the Matt PI
money paid should be employed in purchasing a site equal from the house. In a little time he returned to his mother, hold and cepyhold estate, called Eutoott-lodge, Ruislip, a
Middlesex, ' Aeongrounds, and 231 f w
to the old one, and cueing thereon a new church, and in whom he had left in the house, and said that the children eunntu i's , 0
paying all pumas cr corporations entitled to any part of the still remained in the garden. His mother said that he should end-knocked dontnlior 1,8001. m
ground not forming part of the site. The archbishop and have brought them into the house, and his reply was, "1 . lit kinunazwowli, at the Mart.-Absoluts r 11 GM- d
Whops arranged with the railway company to dispose of have killed them both, as I thought it better to do so tau soon to one-eighth pert of 30,0001., subjca to annuity of al
the property to them for 7,7321. 75., ad out of that money to let them pine to (lath." His mother exclaimed, "0, 3001. per annum to a y an • mortgage on tis a
lad =I 66, d h'
thtauhd: a new church in Scotland-road, capable of seems. Benjamin, you surely havirit," and the prner's answer share of 2,6001., which is entitled to 140. per annum al
1,200 persons, and allotted tbe plaintiff 1,6001. was, "Yee, 1 Wive; we won 0211 to he geld up tomorrow, from the present time--eold for 1003.
ter his Wenn la the aroma and also in the pew rents, and that was the reason I killed them." Absolutereversion of 2 6661 Three
to one-tooth part , ~ per .
he having claimed 2,0001. in respect of the land, Old Evidence having hew MO" to show that the Prima= sew „_9501.
Cents receivable at death or marriage of • lady aged 66 g
3,0004. for the surplus rents. From the evidence it a?. of unsound mind at the time of the murder, the jury see .
poll
peered that the plaintiff maimed the land in 1836, for turned a verdict of .IVoe Guilty on the ground of insanity." e` for 1,0001., with 921 Is. 6d., accumulations on a •
1,200.. and that property in the neighbourhood has much lif aged 2 mi 311 15s 3101
e , pre tun • .- . o
notated in value dace that period. The part of the land SOUTH LANCASHIRE.-LivzsnooL, Dix.. IC • ,
Coetalmt reversion to 1,5001 , provided a ereatleman ,
in which the plastid' claimed an interest had also been Berm pia. Renee Whonnus. end • d 60-4401. '
aged 21 attain 25, survive another age 6
valued by Mr. Helms and Mr. Stewart as being worth Mti &DER. AMOlute reversion to 8001. steeling at death of a gentle- r
Lyon& TM dohndants were sought to be resealed Tura.. li idea Cheedhesee was indicted for having at Over man aged 68-1201.
Bible
iu the careen attributed to them of " statutable arbi- Dineen wilfully murdered Isabella Chatham, his wife. oldcomprising the Fountain '1
Llama property,
Wslwortle let on lease for the Whole term, at 421. 10s., held 1
tratore," and the plaintiff contended that they had not, in Messrs. Wigham and Janus prosecuted ; Mr. Pollock de. r - . t
accordance with the provisions of the statute and in per- feudal- for 17 ware, at 31. 61. ea.
forrience of tee duty thereby cast ups& them, had regard to It weared from the evidence of the little sister of the at the Mart. -Luse sod ccidelll in-
Mt. Jmites lion, . g ,
the plaintiff's internee nor charged the Tallwompany a &seemed, that the warren* took piece on the 15th ult., in eluding attune, of • coffee and chop- hose 25, rest
Mary-
sufficiently large sum for the church and ground. It was the prieasee's owe house. He had gone home on the day in 16 601 'ld Or 901. - '
lebeno-streee, held for 1 years, at ,-so ,
also contended that the 1,5-tOl. offered to the plaintiff for his gond= from the colliery where he corked, end hem= he
• Mn. Menne, at the Mart.-Two houses, Eastbourne, esti- 1
iatenst lathe land and tee rye re rents was quite inadequate ; wife refused to prepare his dinner unless he gave her some at 903. Por .
annum oopyhold fines ge 381. each.-
that the plantar' intenst in the land alone was worth more mosey which be was to have brought, he flew into an ungo• *
1 6401.
than that, and that be had never puled with thisfroierty Mashie rage. He knocked her down, and kneeling on 1 hand Watford,od ire full
Freeho d cuss pre pr uc._., - . per
in the pew rents. In the course of the case it op that her stomach, pummelled her for upraise of as militias. ennnot-66°1- .
the arabishops were only nominal defendants, • railway She eventually succeeded in getting oat of the house, Two acres of freehold budding.gronnd at Watford-8001.
k at Watford-
ounpany having indemcified them and employed their own Moog with her little sister, who acted sis a nuns Free old stable' and eeleh-boss. MO&
weleitaeto defend. sad west to her mother's beriise, which stood at a short lies =tate, comprising 1601 sews of wood and plan-
The t.;...4 chief Justice, in summing up. after d`rectinfl dietanee from her husband's. Hen she stayed all the tattoo. St. Lenard's, ante-60W.
Lessehold house, 8 -street, Islington, estimated
the jury to their finding on avail questions, aid no Right.
motive or morel fault was imputed by the pintiff to Mrs. Knowles, Ca Mother of the dented, deposed that annual vela, 461,, held for 69 years, at 81.-3801.
tlwrg as
efendants, but the plaintiff merely complained that when her daughter arrived :: her house she complained
they had acted on • wrong principle, having received erro- madly of pains in her side, and blood was trickling down lter lid
.Ati-r,i3IZOLOGICAL BETURNS.
emu dries. cheek. After she bad stayed the night she returned to her
The jury then retired to consider their verdict, and after own home. She (Mrs. Knowles) saw her In bed on the
nearly an hour's absence, returned with a verdict for the Sunday following, and she appeared to be extremely ill. aims of fix-rankr, Dec 15, 1849.
pLainu he ff-Dameges, 1,6411. 10s. She rat to:see her from time to time throughout the week. wasthe Weather at tech of the following places at
N' • o'clockyesterday morning The
The Lord Chief Justice then directed how the verdict Oa the 26th she was removed to her (
very
lack house, di in ._of . .- stations are now
arranged orator latitude.
should be entered on the different counts, siring each side led her leg
and arms presented a yeti black appearance.
leave to move against his ruling. Oa the night of the 10th she expired, after much suffer- Ham, nu,. Opens of 1 atnegth of swear Wesair.
The case occupied the entire day, and was not terminated leg. This was about three weeks after the injuries had
until a quarter past six o'clock. been received. She had the appearance of having bee. _____ ,---,f. - cehh
maned for • long time, for her husband had not been work- `l,;;Zr----" -
a. •
Ownießreent Maas
COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.-YzsvEhmiT. lad lull time. Rana le.w. Calm Osman
heroes Ma. Coinessemen Porannews. Mr. S. IL Wralthe, the surgeon who attended the de- pearnagoine &W. •cum Rae
Ile in Nenni.-Nog-Senatenzo. ceased, was examined at considerable length. The bruises Warms .- &W. Osedelesens loin
This bankrupt, who is described as a stock-broker, of urn the body won slight: there wen no other nubs of HAM.'"
rase
Copthall court, whose ease has recently been several times external *jury. It wee possible that a severe blow might pew - sm. oloollemee Bob
before the publie, owing to his appearance at the Guildhall he gives in tite lids wit out eleudeadandiessaetgereffee• Teuramem .... -W. iannehrems lain
Police Court, on a charge of non-surrender and embezzle- 011eword re* Ilmorfentthe inflammation'. the , • there numerrea....... LW. Onsatleeme &sod
ment, was brought up in the custody of Forrester, for the had has greet =MX, Me aloilf:MOM of MaswoL LW. OwslisMissims Orereast
purpose of hie surrender b. lag taken. the Wades, ; end these be had so doubt had mused death. asmens,. ~....., SE. Ounialeweee ropy
Mr. Lawrence, for the bankrupt, applied that his amen- A Wow re the gide might roam those eppearsecee ;to MO WIZAOWI'OM.-...-- "W• "13.2.1°1 °Ter"
der might now be taken, and sited several cages to show other ogees senbi they so readily be attributed. *winnow ........ B. Mese Omega
that the surrender of a bankrupt was always taken as a mat-Darer ».... N.L Cam
Cam ensmined by Mr. Pollock-Want of Bladed hod maw „» -^- L Rain
Ograllases neaten
ter of course on his presenting himself. The spirit of the or Widens dashing reightrdass the appearances found. !.morrow .... g. Cislialleeess lain
bankrupt law had always been to afford • locus pennant'. Pea in the MA back, an side an common symptoms in- CAMBRUMR
Mr. Military, for the assignees and creditors who have dated by hay& If ilia inflammation had alien from local ituasT
instituted the proceedings, 'smelted that the surrender mums, witness shall sertainly have applied lama& Lastusowe B.W. Omtlellesem Pow
LW. amiledlemes overcast
add not now be taken, no satisfactory reason being shown Imes Risley, a Oise eager was next examined-On Pwwwwww°°. °•"- i'. Namvssad p 4,47
why it had not takea place on the day named in the fiu. The the Ind infant he mama the prisoner at Over Dar- /10,,,t a„' , w.Lur,, Gm* nom Partially magi
28th of September last was tbe:lasiiisnally appointed for the wan. In the vS the primmer had confused to beat- MAccceenc......, U. Ossiaslmane Omaha
bankrupt to surrender ;he now that he was prevented fag lie wife. bed bed • metention about putting the I.lllCANrss AL Can Casa
doing so by illness, which de him abroad. It would pea c 4 wane an ire. Oho at 1.4 threw the water slim Warsaw=
super that at that time and subsequently le was in regular by lege, sad les opensher her will' his fast. asammem s.w. guns tomes Mak=
communication with his clerk, for the purpose of making Mr. Retrials, it dad* end dna* at Oven Dam Cake Overcast
away with his estate. He also alleged that he had been pee. Mabel that about the Thanker's( day he bed been Leas -..........„ W. Cake Partially COI*
BERWICK
vented retuning to England by certain reports which be to primer's Mess to see the gleamed. He heed ski °wow _...... , BW. Cella Partially away
saw in the newspapers, intimating that criminal proosodimp hat avers her. He gave her • states elf sestets a am- Ressmaa &w. use Medias
Wen to be takes enlist him. mink ad a ]fete ' te of nitre. She died about three THIN DAY Noon.
bg, Law,,,,,, objected ac, any least of it. benkfapee, weeks after Ms. had stabesqually pees/abed for bar Wen* of wind. hate a/Weather.
written sutseqeently to the 28th September, being ludo ado Powdomos weld oftwarde admit WNW_ . _ CRUM d Inas.
evidence. Crowe:mast by Mr. Pelee -TM dammed, wan fiest RAW. Oak of win Rainy.
His Heuer said he should put oat Of reoneiderstice way- witness sew her, bed • ranch mide•-albesena. Aired her 111° Mel" "In th° "twin, Owl did not reach till
thing grebstquat to thatdate. su woad ow be awed bar awns bar caw in time for publication yesterday j. they therefore indi
I George logall, a former clerk of the bankrupt, proved Ohs did net slate that say Mahan had geed mwt,,_?_!,ho mtwo 0 the native 011 Tnnzoney =ening ot Ela
that he went to Boulogne on to 29th of July. Wham lowgeds lam The prisoner hod he
latterly le his employ. °'+slat. WM'
alterwarele saw him there and took him a tear to ea He wes nit Wag ease& to de sherd dee 's work ea a erd. Baena& ,.. I. r
Nests hea Mem themes
ma*. Mad dais had Asset eommeniestises with him. bet. Witness sew homed from demased's mother that hanvon Omelet
lleinved 161101111de to be about 30.0001• she had seSsnd any W treamint.
who Tax ........-.... ...... LL Own Bram Osman
want .....-......... I. insenglkeme Omar&
1 Mr. Lomas mid the Malays wee in ant, and
M annined. might Nana Caine?. melds* ant doer to ths prienter, sad gam, . i,
big kaslamal, *dear, win oiled * panel a min. Deno,

The reiranis th• u pawn did not reach Ibis
eAa is this he pebleelhe 7eehlrdS7 ; they therefore indi-
cate the gate of haat as Thursday morning at Nine
°Week.

THE EXPRESS, SATURDAY EVENING, DECEMBER 15, 1849.