The Express.
London, England, 1853-08-27 00:00:00

ALLEusu ivicusnr 131.4 CLERUEII.4:;.

la the County Court, WalJingle d, lierl,ahire, on
TueeiMya an motion was brought before Mr. t• are, by Mr. I
W. tl. as y praet.sitoe a'. Keit; ate, Satre,.
against Moo Eris tbeth Lingle), tir.ug'ate,, of the ftvo.
Jame' imnglay, the vicar at one et the parishes in that
teen, to neuter the sans of 101 , interest spun 114e1., lent
to her lwother, the Rey. Thomas thalami Langley, alleged
to be secured upon an huh astute ut mortgage of her revel-
Monary mu rest in et rtain property helm athed by her
late mother. It cm..ared that in the 'month of July.
11151, the It v. T B. Langtry call. d upon a teepee-
table s theitor't firm in Basiseghelbstreet, London, where
le hat previously transacted some marten of bu•i-
new, and applied for the loan of lON., stating that
hit sister bail kindly consented to give a 'wearily upon
her property. On the 24th of July, In consequence of a
letter nee-teed (rum the Rev. T. B. Langley. who was then
staying st Walling,' wd. um of the firm 01 ors arranged
to meet him and tus sitter at Wellingford.road station on
the Great Western Railway. 111 attended according tt
appointment, but CM met by M.. Langley only, who stated
that hi. sitter was too ill to accompany him. The inqui-
ries at the interview appeared to be satiefactory. and, on
this g. ntleman's return to town, he wrote to Mr. Burt,
the plaintiff in the action, who consented to advance the
1100noy required. The deed of s• rarity fur repaying the
SUM borrowed. with Inf. costs, and per cent. Interest,
wa. prepared by Mr. Burt, and forwarded to Ba-
situ; II I . ..vt for ap •ro v ii. and when engrossed,
Wu tranemi!•ed to the Reverend T. Langley, at Bad•
•• %V ',hire fur execution. It was returned
se). .
s.gnett •• Ttoonat B .11 Ind Lanviey and Elizabeth Langley,"
and th • at••• 411.0 eat the Rev. Edmund B 'mos, curate it
Beatty. A declaration. tul.ms• tto have been made by Mist
Langley. before the Mayor of Benham, was returned with
the td (In receipt 01 these documents a further comma-
oicat e.g. made to Mr. Burt, arid he went to London,
and "aid the money to the Basinghall-street solicitors, who
headed it aver to Mr. Langley. The matter rested quietly
until the month of June in the present year, when, as the
Inter. .t had nut been remitted, application was made by
Mr. Burt to Mies Langley for payment, and then '
fur the first time the learnt that her name bad been
coup, eted with the luau. As aeither she nut her
father wuald iononst to pay the amount, the action was
brought in the County Court. The deed was m•aluced,
and whim put i.to the hands of the Rae. Edmund Boggle,
late t unite of Badsey, he swore that his siguature, as at-
testlnd witness, was • forgery; sal Miss Lar.gley was
equally positive that the signature of " Elizabeth Langley"
wet not in her handwriting, neither had she nor the al-
leged Airs-ins" climes, ever seen the deed until that day.
Oa heating this et eh nos. the Judge nonsuited the plaintiff.
with costa. The forgery 11 the moot complete ever fleeted,
and no &not Mr. Langley must have been a.tisted by a
female. lits whereabouts is nut known , but it te believed
that for mare than a year pact he has been naitl.o,4 abroad.