The Express.
London, England, 1847-10-11 00:00:00

SPORTING.

NEWMARKET SECOND SPRING MEEITNO.
NEWVARKET, SIINDAY MORNING.--In addition to the
berm already stood to be to the arighboorhood, the &larks boa
entord. or wOl M boo la saw al tbe day :—Rod Rea Saw
ea The Mi. • Wbeitoolor. Mama dads, Lee&
lady Eidallayolewbott=
Gook IlThe Whip f, dam
Bea, NM lash, Clot aWe Oebbier, Doak, Lady Wu.
k., Lady Lana. PaNio, Charm Ora ILL oat 'of lay
Edo% FA. t 3 Mho-nat. Chetry two ta-yr ebb by Don
=11.7. Tweak. Mama 11=.6%katri...nut, Rada" Jahn
Novi" Outwit. Isikwfirlii,
Dam of Illehatod,iltmeettprianahaw, f try , ileadloaa
Palmas% 11111 L la6semee, Is
Wan saksairk Mom
saw." lad 4No* kw , vine aro oWia=
Not lens ale to fn.. radar r mmema4 atm to
every mama oballiamt unto at. AU the alas an EA sat
1 aftl • Ink Womb the tan. A grist =WNW woe tried
ea ea May, imi lama= partamierbod as baying
to all ma baboons a pat Inowilo lartholamowiteh at
'Cligelmiait ma leant atedora alto hear, Chia la s arrived. It
brae mama ailea teat the stresses wiD be wally knee.
widow Edo mormay was ray salnourable. led aglow lady
to sleep; theatwabO uk to belo ward order.

isimsioiriiiWinii-,lia-j4—y.

-i--"-iii-------- 12-. el r
CHIPPINIUX _TAINS lONs. each, 5 __OM_ pill
U declared. ands; Woe mai wii • distance.
Mr. Bristow! Leflorgy ' 1 1
Mr. Pryoes Boma Beek ........ . 0 2
Mr. Hawn'. Twom 0 3
Mr. Brewer's Insdanzatz
Mr. Oliver's Valera&
Wood:wily.
WTe gELLING STAMM of 3 lONS. sash, and 23:added,
the second to save' hls stake. Mots ; twigs round.
MT. PM', Raft the Beau 3 1 I
Captain Kohtht's Jolly Beggar
Mr. Wood's Amazement 0 2 3
Mr. litrby's Monsieur Penal ...«. 2 dr.
Wcaalmerly.
HANDICAP for the bosun Mew, of 3 eon. each, 1 ft,
with :Gadded. Hate ; twice mama mil a distance.
Kr. Brewer's Bravitialmo
SETTING AT MANCECIVITER.—FRIDAT:
. .

CavousvrtT672:7;; FagsiliemlnToeenCeii, 9 to I set
WI" Ewe (t), 10 to 1 opt Geroldtas (dill), 10 to 1 mot Bob
Roy, to IMK MW W6O. f (1). II to 1 sitot Llytom (t),1410 art
Wool ?Woo, 16 to I opt Inheritor., IS to I lot et. latrreate,
95 to 1 opt GEtono, 23 to 1 art Vanity, 2$ to 1 opt Comm&

CALEDONIAN AUNT AND WESTERN MEETlNG.—Tooseosw.
ATILSHIM H4NDICAT of 25 sow. each, 16 ft, and 6lt
wily If &chord, with 601. added, the @mood to sere his *ha 2
Wks. Fifteen sub..
Larderry's King of the Fore - (Miami I
Eglintoun's Ptsodit . I
Mr. Merry's Mead of Motherwell $
Sir J. Roswell's

Won by a neck. -
.
oI.IDOMAN Cc r of 105 non., for 5-yr elk 754 ; 4 yrs,
eit.'llb; 5 rs, est 9lb ; 6 yrs and &god, 8.6 121 b. I Liss.
Led igfttosn's Plaudit (J. Marion) 1
M. Marry% Meld of lassitersrell ... 2
Sia ria's ileema
Woe by ii troth.
SWElrlirAine ef Five Sovereigns each, and 50 added.
Nabti ma nib. nee salsa
NA Inbeesses Ten leash (Parr) 1 9 1
Ilk J. leenrellaellissis
ht. IL Serdsufs Singh said Reedy 0 1 dis
Mr. leisyta Pligrima. 0 dr
Pm Kanner-LP of Five Sovereigns each, and BO added.
Sailmee Mos. Once round sad a die Four subs.
IllsoillesreNcessw fem..' -
Mr. llerrys Marian Emmy ..... ....
Me J. Dareeirs Swaths..

i Tstlat) 1
2

Won by • Inset*.

tato intalltgencr.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.
Bohn Mr. Commissioner Evans.
AN IMPORTANT PoiNT--IN RE W. H. BOALET.—This
insolvent, who was described as of Stanninglield, Suffolk,
jobber, now applied for his final order, which was granted
without opposttion.—Mr. Sturgeon said there was a great
difficulty in this cue. Ibe insolvent bad been arrested 16
days since, under an order issued by the reounty court, after
be had got his protection from this court, for a debt inserted
in the schedule. He (Mr. Sturgeon) was fully aware that
this court had no power to make soy order for discharge until
the period ofcommitraent hadexpired,hut, however, he would
draw his honour's attention to the 102nd sec. of the 9 & 10
Vic., cap. 95, which ran in these words: " And be it enacted
that, whenever any order of commitment shall have been
made as aforesaid, the clerk of the said court shill issue,
under the seal of the court, • warrant of commitment,
dhvanal to one of the Willa of say county court, who, by
sash ituraat, shall be empowered to take the body of the
posse wild when seek elder shell be made ; and ager
MAW end ether pone imam wink their several *bib.
thnesiall Mita dm menden et only each mad the
poise or lova el sway pd, been et end
pinta newillemed sash order than be band te n-
aive and hop the t therein, until diesharged under
the pareidene et this tn., or otherwise by dos cease et law ;
and me peslosies oder, et certificate granted hy say court
et inseh art: Om seffet•timet debtor', shell be
andhlirie asele sow debacle* is may commitment,
coder sash laeddidoilidOsi litedr." Viola then abeam-
etances, Mr. titoget• OM preireethe eider would
Ilented tv to the paw, to dleshouge
Inn at iho eapheilern the time named In the nineid
cenetlYneole Illatenwar woold see the great lanowaninf
-Ciadcfintlea, inmente me ft interfered with the pecan at


thiaaanevja4aelag proteetiun, oust in cameo( bankruptcy.
during the period of examination. Rio honour raid that he
could do nothing but grant the usual order (the final order);
and he was not swam that the insolvent might net get out
in fifty different ways. Be (Mr. Cominiestiones Beane) had
no power to interfere
ADJOURNKINT Stagnis.—ln RE EDWARD EDMUNS
This bankrupt wee a hosier at Knightsbridge, and ben now
applied te pass his last examination, which wu opposed by
Kr. Rosd.—lt appeared that this was Edmunds' second
bankruptcy, and his examination bad been adjourned leveral
times. He had only been in trade seven mouths, and, by
the each account filed toy him, it was stated that be e2m-
menoed businesswith 7071., aad that he sold goods to tkeYer-
tent of 1,1001., which was accounted for in this way :
expense', /lc., 6001. ; journeys and mereations, 601. ; tra-
velling expenses, 401.; and expenses attending a wedding,
801. The bankrupt also took credit for 3.101. as being paid
for furniture, which, however, was not the fact. Now, Maud
of having to amount for 1,1001. it since turned out that he
bad purchased goods to the extent of 2,4001. which 'nu un-
accounted for.—Mr. Coin. Evans wished to know how the
bankrupt could answer these allegations against him.—The
bankrupt said that his books had been kept very indiffer-
ently, and that he could furnish no better accounts.—Mr.
Cam. Evans said that he could not be satisfied with such
amounts. Were there any vouchers for the expenses I—Mr.
Reed replied that there were nose at all.—Mr. Com. Evans
said that this was a very suspkious case, and must be ad-
journed sins die.
IN RE TER FORTE MARINE ASSURANCE COMPANT.—
In this case the proceedings have been frequently before the
court, and as frequently repotted. This was a meeting
specially appointed for the proof of a debt of 6531. upon a
policy, which was admitted without opposition.

CLRIIKEN WELL COUNTY COURT.—Ssrunnsv.
INVOLWATION POE LANDLORDS. —BALMOS If. WHITING.
—ln this cue Mr. Wakeling, for the plaintiff, informed the
court that the action was brought to recover compensation
for an excessive distrait, and for injures sustained by his
client for having been refused a free access to his place of
Wain' ess; and several witnesses were celled, who proved that
at Michaelmas twelve months, the plaintiff, who is a sawyer
and cabinet maker, took possession of a steam-boiler, with
mime workshops wad other premises, belonging to Mr.
Whiting, under an agreement at a rental of 521. per annum,
which premises adjoined those used by the defendant, who is
in an extensive way of business as a furrier in Onslow-street,
llatton-garden. Free ingests and egress were on all occasions
to be allowed to the pleintiff only through the gates of the
yard used by the defendant to that one rented by the former,
for whose better accommodation a private door was made
by consent for his workmen and customers. As soon as
the plaintiff had taken possession he began to improve
the property in erecting out-buildings, and he expended
between 901. and 1001. in machinery necessary to his
trade, towards the cost of which the defendant allowed
him the first quarter's rent. About Midsummer•day the de-
fendant's agent applied for a quarter's rent, which not being
forthcoming on an appointed day, the defendant bricked
up the private entrance, and occasioned a loss to the
plaintiff in his trade of at least 141. The defendant,
nine days afterwards, levied for the quarter's rent,
and the plaintiff lost the whole of his property with
the erections. The excess was estimated at over 80!.
by the plaintiff, and one of his principal witnesses
said that one saw that was in use was worth 301., another
5!., and seven others were valued at from 11. to 21. After
the distress the plaintiff applied to be admitted, but he was
refused, and up to the present time he had not been able to
obtain an entrance, notwithstanding he held an agreement
for three years. No inventory of his property, which was
condemned for 121. 10a., had been given to him. The pro-
perty had since been sold privately for 141 10s., but the
sale did not take place until after the action was brought.—
The learned judge explained the law, and left it to the jury
to say what compensation, if any, the plaintiff ought to re-
ceive.—The jury, after a long consultation, returned a ver-
dict for 71. 10s.

WESTMINSTER COUNTY COURT.
THE LAW OF OVERPOPULATED LODGINGS.— THOMP-
SON V AUSTIN.—This was an action brought before D. C.
Moylan, Esq., to recover one week's rent of the defendant,
for the use and occupation of furnished apartments. The
defendant pleaded that, in consequence of the beds and other
articles of furniture being infested with extremely trouble-
some occupants, he did not have " quiet" possession ; and
that the apartments being uninhabitable, he was justified in
quitting without notice, and was no longer chargeable with
the rent. In support of the plea, Mile Austin and Sarah
Wilkins, the servant, were examined, and proved that the
apartments were actaally besieged by vermin, who not only
made their appearance at night, but even in the do, time.
They tame in such multitudes that no sleep could tie ob-
tained; and it frequently happened that when Miss Austin
appeared in the breakfast-room, numbers of noxious insects
were taken from her clothe,. The plaintiff was told of the
nuisance, and the bedstead was taken down and cleaned, but
Ma few daysthe unpleasant population reappeared,and the de-
fendant left without giving any notice.—The plaintiff denied
that the bedstead and furniture ware ever m the state de-
scribed. He had frequently slept on the bed, and had never
been molested, and the late Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland had
also slept in it, and had never complained.—The learned
judge said that might be; the insects might have had some
respect for • lord-lieutenant, and had abstained from mo-
lesting him. (Laughter.) The learned judge said the plea
was good, and having been established by evidence he must
hold it to be • Food answer to the action. The law was
clearly laid down in the case of " Smith v. Marable," where
the court held that the plea was good, and that the defendant
was justified is leaving his furnished apartments at Brighton,
on account of • similar nuisance rendering the lodgings un-
inhabitable. It might be possible that the plaintiff and the
late Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland had not been molested ; but
upon the evidence of Miss Austin, corroborated as it was by
the servant, he had no other alternative than to dismim the
case.