The Express.
London, England, 1847-11-09 00:00:00

SPORTING.
TATTRILLA LL'S —Mod o iv.
.11111 lIIMMist for thil (Leighton and Novagaber meeting,
Ronolomasigentorilay altetooon. but to very llltis purpose, money
PP Manse awl mosplests name general Aso ever. L'nder
Bar rlMea~f dremagnosnat it Is Mimi asollons to add, the is.
wimissia IR the wed ipmeatlese a.oaadud were, with
alias or two egoaptismb wry amisX moguls.
MIWPOZT FROWNS& BTRIPLI tO I eget
111,111111 r. 10 to 1 sett Charatr. Is to i apt M. Lager, to tie.l apt
Ilene, 13 to 1 apt Ciesortaher.
DIRPT.-11 tO 1 acAlwadower, 11 to 1 eget Surplice
(Ili to 1 t 4, 13 to 1 apt JorikAt to 200 i.), 20 tot apt Musser
(t), XI to 1 apt Aran, be apt Na Desperandoia (t 23 to I). 23
2,3 1 WA loodstona 30 to 1 apt (Mabee, (t), 33 to I ago Genevan (t),
NSW
SORT
• to apt PeenOß (t),T
30 to 1 apt Roselyn.
PACIRMS. STEEPLE CHASE.
Acoarrelices row Tux Halms RAGS.—The Hoek,
1 Ist 1010; Sod L. llat ; Christopher North, 1 Ist ; Variety,
HO; Manor, 114; 'Th• Petty, I ; Vakrla. 104 12lb; Wawa
104 1218 LilPs7 104 Mb; Emigrant, lOst 41b; Canary, lOat ;
hataarober. 104; s lOst.
ENTRIRS SOR TES ARISTOCRATIC STIRPLZ CRASS
TM Roarer, Soyla. Moonlight. Chandler Carlo, 0111.7, tom
Zanproo, Gayhurat, Lane Jab; Oradea, &bine, Tory. Right
outooribes did not name.
WOROSSTIR RACSA—Tke &cid* hoot of the Handicap
Hurdle ;Rios war run on Atturday, and ..0 by desk. A emotion
W been oared whether, am this rap was not run out on Friday, the
Ont+eagbt to stead.

Cato Enteltgentr.
EQUITY COURTS.
&fore We Lord Chiacellor.

CVIMON a. BiILtwoRTHY.—CON AAAA NCB OP ESTATE.—
Ai-Luton FRAUD.—The Lord Chancellor gave judgment in
this ease. It was ea appeal from the Vice Chancellor of
England, and was argued on the 15th of July, 1846. The
bill was filed for the purpose of setting aside a conveyance of
tea acres of land in Devonshire, upon the ground of fraud
on the part of the defendant in obtaining the conveyance,
and also of inadequacy of price. Property, including these
ten acres, ha 4 been devised by the plaintiff's grandfather to
his eldest son in tail male, subject to a mortgage for 1201.
The latter died in 1840, leaving the plaintiff, his eldest son
and heir, who for some time before his father's death had
been dealing with the defendant in respect of his ex-
pectancies, and he bad actually contracted to sell
this farm for 401., which contract he executed to the de-
fendant u soon as the father died. The bill stated that
the plaintiff was • person of weak mind, and often in die
trees, and that the defendant took advantage of him, and
obtained the property at a price far below its value. The,
Vice• Chancellor dismissed the bill, as the proof of fraud
failed, and inadequacy of value was not, he thought, a suffi-
cient ground to set the conveyance aside ; but. even as to
want of value the case as proved was against the plaintiff,
as it appeared he received two sums of 4W.
The Lord Chancellor, alter stating the main facts, observed
that fraud, an alleged in the bill, must in a case of this sort ,
be clearly proved, and not left es a matter of inference from
the evidence. Without such proof, • court of equity would
not interfere to take from the defendant the legal title which
be had acquired. If admissions of the defendant were to be
relied on, they should be distinctly stated in the bill, other-
wise the defendant could not know what case he had to
meet. Several dineersations between the parties, in 1838
and 1839, were stated in the bill, but the points intended to
be made by them were upset by the answer, or failed of
effect for want of proof of the main cue made by the bill.
The case of fraud having thus failed for want of proof, his
lordship w a of opinion with the Vice-Chancellor, that there
was not sufficient ground tor betting aside the transaction,
and he affirmed the decree appealed from, with cuts.
BELLAMY v. SAIHNIL—SuI ICITOR AND CLIONT.—CON-
vETANCII VOlD.—llia lordship gave judgment in this case
alto. It was an appeal from a decree of Vice-Chancellor
Knight Bruce, and was argued July were 20, 1846 The facts
thus:—The plaintiff was tenant in tail of an estate in
Doreetshire; and, being in debt,he was advised by the defend.
ant, who was his solicitor, to join in a deed with his eldest son,
then of age, to cut off the entail and raise money. The plain-
tiff and son, acting on that advice, ex. cuted a conveyance of
the estate to the defendant in consideration of an annuity
for them, and the survivor of them, and for the children of
the son, if he had may. The defendant did not make any
such provision ; but he raised money, by mortgage of the
estate, sufficient to pay the debt due to himself, and
some small sums which he paid to the plaintiff and eon.
The plaintiff's eldest son having died, a bill was filed in 1834
by his next bro,her, to set aside the conveyance to the defend-
ant. That cause was heard by the then Muter of the Rolls
(the present Lord Chancellor) who held that the conveyance
eonld not he allowed to stand, but still that the mortgagees
should be treated as fair incumbrancers on the estate, and a
reference was made to the master to take the proper &G-
-avots. Before that inquiry was made the father filed the
present bill for the purpose of having the monies raised by
the defendant handed over to him. That suit cams to be
heard before Vice, Chancellor Knight Bruce, and he dis-
missed the bill, but, notwithstanding, granted a reference to
the muter to make certain inquiries as to transactions be-
tween the plaintiff and his son and the defendant, subse-
quent to the transactions stated is the former suit.—The
Lord Chancellor, Defers giving his judgment, read • state-
ment of the circumstances, and afterwards his judgment,
which (after noticing some irregularities—first, in amend-
lag the bill and altering the record, without consent
of deteodant or further answer from him ; and after-
wards in the decree directing inquiries as to mat-
ters not stated in the bill, and • report on which,
therefore, could not be available in any subsequent prO-
met:tinge in the case) reversed the decree appealed from.
His lordship believed the Vice Chancellor thought he was
prevented by the decree at the Rolls from coming to any
other conclusion, or he would have made a decree that could

not be questioned; but, as the decree he made appeared to
be inconsistent with the decree of the Rolls, which his lord-
ship thought a right decree, he felt obliged to reverse
this decree.
FORDYCE O. BRIDOBs.—Tbe opening of this appeal from
a decree of the Master of the Rolls occupied the rest of the
day, and will require one or two dais more before it will be
concluded. The csie involves a conflict of the laws of Eng-
land and Scotland in respect of real estate ; also questions as
to the appointment of trustees and their power.

Before the Vim-Chancellor of England.
THR GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY V. THR BIRMINGHAM
AND ORFORD RAILWAY COMPANY.—BILL FOR Sr chic
PEILPORMANCI OP AN AGREEMINT.—DEMURRER.—Thie
a bill f.r *pacific performance of an agreement entered int*
between the Great Western, the Birmingham and Oxford,
and the Birmingham, Dudley, and Wolverhampton Railway
Companies, by which it was agreed that an amalgamation
should take piece between the Birmingham and Oaford
the Birmingham and Dudley Railways, sad that the said
smalgamsted railway should be sold to the Great Western
Railway. It was further agreed that the Great Western
should pay the sum of 101. ss. premium on each share el
201. in the said two undertakings, the said premium to be-
come payable within six months alter the completion and
opening of the mid linen from Fenny Compton
and Stretford-nn-Avon, through Birmingham to the
junction neer Wolverhampton ; that the two railways whoa
amalgamated should consist of one capital of seventeen ham-
deed thousand pounds, to be divided into 85,000 shares, of
201. each. A gexeral demurrer to this bill was put in by
the Birmingham and Oxford Company.
Sir Fitzroy Ke.ly opened the case on behalf of the demur-'
ring detindants, and contended that Ilse contract entered
into between the three companies could not be enforced by a
court of equity. The contract was simply this, that the
Birmingham and Oxford and the Birmingham and Dudley
Railways should be amalgamated, and the two should be
then sold to the Great Western Railway Company. This
object, however, could not be carried out under any cir-
cumstance*, without an act of parliament being passed,
so that the bill asked for the specific perform.
ance elf one agreement, which must depend for its
fulfilment upon a previous act of the legislature. It was in
fact a contract to awry out an amalgamation of three rail.
ways atter the legislature had thought fit to make them
three separate railways. If an act of parliament were not
to be obtained, it was evident that the contract could not be
performed, and, looking at the various circumstances of the
ease, it was highly probable no such set ever would be
passed. The first great objection to this bill was that the
directors had no power to apply the money of their share-
holders to any other purpose than thatVor which it was origi-
nally subscribed. It was not competent for any governing body
to bind their shareholders, who had paid their money teethe
keeping up of a particular railway, to purchase or be amal-
gamated with 'nether railway. There were two authori-
ties upon this subject, which clearly proved that the
directors of a company could have no power to apply
money subscribed for one purpose to a differtnt object.
Here there was a definite number of shareholders, a definite
amount of capital, and • definite object to be performed j
but the directors intended to apply that money fur a totally
different purpose. In the paso of " Natusche e. Irving
eitedin "Pow on PartnershiP," the plaintiffs had become sub-
scribers to a society called the Alliance British and Foreign
Life and Fire Assurance Company, which had been insti-
tuted for the purpose of taking insurances upon life and pro-
perty, and it was thought desirable for the interests of the
society to extend the operations to marine assurance's. well,
but the plaintiffs and others being dissatisfied with this in-
tention filed a bill to prevent such application of the funds.
The case tame before Lord Eldon, who decided that the
shareholders having risked their money upon one under-
taking, could not be compelled to allow of its being ap-
plied for other purposes. Now, if this case was to be
eonsidered an authority, the governors of these rail-
way companies had no p ewer to enter into any content
for uniting their different - ipanies, and if they had re-
power to do en, tit
contract. There

minor y notes to the extent of 9371., payable on demand,
upon the understanding that they should be immediately
returned. Clark was trustee to the composition. Mr. Com-
missioner Fans : Whet ! You put your name to a bill for
9371. when you could only pay your other creditors 7s. 6d.
in the pound I—Bankrupt : I did.—Mr. Commissioner
Fane Then you are not fit to be a trader. In fact, you put
each a thing as that into the public market not caring two
pins who was cheated by it Of course it could be
worth nothing, because you had no means.—Bank-
rept : It was not intended to cheat. —Mr. Commis-
sioner Fans : It appears to me very little better
than thieving. When you put your name to these
bills you had not 937 pence, and your own sense
surely told you it was a cheat —Bankrupt: I had confidence
in Clark's honour.—Mr. Cooke: Hes he become bankrupt ?
—Bankrupt: He has. He said he would return the bills.—
Mr. Commissioner Fane : Then what was the good of lour
lending your name ? And you must have a very poor notion
of my understanding, if you fancy that I shall not think
this a fraud and a cheat. Ido not believe one word of what
you say.—Cross-examined by Mr. Duncan : Bolt advanced
the composition money ; I only received the 711. 6d. When
Clark 'eked for the acceptance he was supplying the bank-
rupt with goods.—Mr. Duncan : If you did not let him have
your acceptance, did you think he would stop your credit ?
—Mr. Commissioner Fans : I will not allow that question,
for you might as well my if you had not stole that
loaf you might have been extremely hungry.
Mr. Duncan was then heard on behalf of the bankrupt,
stating that he did not ask for an immediate certificate under
the c;-cueastanom, but, considering that Clark had bean the
holdfast is trade, that the latter had not intended

bankrupt.
a public fraud in giving the bill, that his anawm had been
given very clearly, and that he had been now six months
without his certificate, the learned counsel concluded by
hoping that, if the certificate were suspended it would be for
a short period.—His Honour mid it wee a case of too much
importance to decide today, and would defer giving judg.
meat for a short period.—Darted accordingly.

POLICE.-YESTEEDAT.
MANSION-HOUSE.— ROBBERT.—MARRTING BOTH
MOTHER AND DAUGHTER.— Elizabeth Crowley, aged 23,
was charged with attempting to rob Mr. William
Crawley.—The complainant, who stated his age to be 77
years, mid that at about two o'clock be went to the East
India House to receive his pension, which he put into his
trews.» pocket The moment he had buttoned his pocket
the prisoner, who was behind him, dipped her hand in to
get hold of his purse, and made the moat desperate effort to
possess herself of it with all its contents.—The Lord Mayor :
i.e. you are both of the same name; is she your daughter ?
—Complainant: No, my lord. She is my wife. I married
her in Sc. George's Church, Bloomsbury, a little more than
six years ago ; but all she cared about was my property, and
that was mother's object, too, in marrying me.—The Lord
Mayor: What! do you mean to say you are married to her
mother ?—Complainant, Indeed I do, my lard; and more
is my sorrow. The mother is just as bad as herself.—The
Lord Mayor Then her mother, your first wife, is still alive?
—Complainant said she was alive, but she was net his first
wife, who died just before he married the mother. He was
in a state of insanity from grief, and the pair got hold of him
thinking he had • large property. The mother, after he
married her, said " she would make her daughter marry
him if he would release her." He married the daughter about a
fortnight after, and never had • happy moment since.—The
prisoner said she was the victim of thegrosseitdeception. Her
mother, it was true, had married Mr. Crawley, but she was
not a day with him when she found out what • bad man he
was, and she was glad to get rid of him upon any terms.
After being married to the prisoner for six years he not only
refused to give her a farthing, but denied halla-crown a
week to their child.—The prisoner, having promised not to
molest the applicant in future, was discharged.
WORSHIP-STREET. SUBPECTRD MATRICIDE AT
HACLNCY.— Wm. Sheridan was chard upon suspicion of
rs wilfully murdering his mother, M. ranee' Sheridan, an
inquest on whose body appears in another part of our paper.
—Police-sergeant Has kes stated that on Monday last infor-
mation reached the station-house that the deceased, who had
expired after a short illness on the previous Friday, had met
her death by unfair means. A preliminary Investigation
had taken place berme the coroner, who had given orders tar
the prisoner's apprehension. On the road to the station the
prisoner stated that the charge had arisen from the bad feeling
of one of his sisters ; the latter, however, who was the prin-
cipal witness in the came, was unable to attend, being then
under the care of Dr. Osrrod, from injuries she had sustained
at the hands of the prisoner.—Mary Armstrong, who had
laid out the body of the deceased, stated that she heard
the sister accusing her brother of poisoning hie mother,
that he made no denial of it upon either occasion, and
that the sister afterwards told her she had been seriously
injured by the prisoner in consequence of her interference.
—W. Randle, the landlord of the -house, deposed to his hav-
ing been disturbed by constant altercations between the pri-
soner and the rest of his family, and one of which occurred
with unusual violence on the night preceding the death of
the deceased, while she was confined to her bed.—Mr.
Hawn, surgeon, deposed to having attended the deceased
for the four days preceding her death. During the time she
had been under his care she had been labouring under
diarrhma and extreme vomiting. She was progressing
favourably under his treatment until the day preceding her
death, when he was asked whether she was not in such a
state of danger as would justify the preparation
of her will ? He replied, with some surprise, in
the negative, as she was decidedly better, twat on
visiting her in the evening found that she was alarm-
ingly worse, and labouring under symptoms which coald not
have been produced by anything he had prescribed for her.
This was at 10 o'clock at night, and at 4 the next morning
she was dead. The post morfem examination 'rid since been
made by himself and Dr. Letheby, and from an analysis of
the contents of the stomach, and appearance of the liver,
they had come to the conviction that the death of the de-
ceased had been caused by arsenic, of which they had die.
covered a sufficient quantity to destroy the lives of several
persons. They were also decidedly of opinion that some
portion of the poison must have been administered • week
or • fortnight antecedent to, and a considerable quantity
within 48 hours of, her death. On being called upon fiar his
defence, the prisoner repeated the statement he bad pre-
viously made to the officer, that the charge had solely emanated
from the malicious feeling of his sister, who had participated
with his mother in an allowance of 701. per annum that he
made her out of his income, and was actuated by a ground-
less fear that he, as the eldest son, would become sole inhe-
ritor of hi. mother's property.—The prisoner was remanded.
CLERK EN W EL L. —Cite it or OBTAINING MONEY UNDER
PRETENCE OF PROCURING COUNEEL.—Mr. Head, a soli-
citor, attended in consequence of • report which appeared in
the morning journals of Saturday, in reference to a charge
made against H. M. Flanigan, for having obtained Hit
under false pretences from a poor woman named Denny,
representing that Mr. Harry, the barrister, would be engaged
to defend her son.—Mr. Head said that Flanigan represented
himself as his authorised clerk, which he positively denied,
he never haring given him his sanction or authority for
such conduct; and, if the circumstance was suffered to
remain uncontradicted, it would have a tendency to do him
injury.—Mr. Combo said he could have nothing to do with
the case—it was never before him ; but it was a great pity
something was not done to prevent such proceedings.—Mr.
Head said he was only anxious to correct an untruth, which
might injure him. lie thanked Mr. Combe, and ICA the
court.

THAMES.—Ronnixo A LODGING.—C. Kennard, a
German portrait painter, was charged with having stolen
three pillow cases. and articles of wearing apparel, the pro.
pert, of Hannah Parker, No. 14, Grove-street, St. George's-
in•the•East. About three weeks since the prisoner rented a
front parlour of Mrs. Parker' and made an arrangement with
her to board and lodge him for three weeks, at the expiration
of which time he said be would pay her from the proceeds of a
bill which he said he had received from his father in Ger-
many, but which wa. not payable till that time. On Friday
week the prisoner told Mrs. Parker's husband if he would
accompany him to town the next morning he should get the
money, and would then pay what he owed. On the Satur-
day morning he got up much earlier than usual and went
out. As he did not come back they searched his room, and
found he bad taken not only his own things but articles be-
longing to Mrs. Parker. Yesterday evening he was appre-
hended.—The prisoner, who cried bitterly, acknowledged
having taken two tablecloths, but denied haring abstracted
the other things. He said want had driven him to it. His
whole money was expended, and even his stock of paints
was exhausted.—Mr. Yardley remanded the prisoner till
Wednesday.
WANDSWORTH.—FATAL ATFRAT ON TIM RIVER,—
J. Wright was charged with fighting on board a barge on
the river Thames, in the parish of Battersea, and thereby
miring the death of. J. Powell by drowning. T. Davies
stated that he is captain of a ballast barge called the
Patience." The prisoner, the deceased, and a third man
named Buckridge, had been employed by witness on the
barge for about six weeks. They all went on shore on Sun-
day afternoon, when the deceased and prisoner had sone
words. While witness was in the cabin he heard something
about fighting, and called out that he would have no fighting,
and told them to goon with their work. Directly after wards-he
heard a scuffling end fighting on deck, when he went up ind
found the prisoner and the deceased fighting. They had two
or three rounds before witness and Buckridge could se rate
them, and then deceased jumped into the boat and challenged
the prisoner to fight on shore. Witness would not allow the
boat to go, and deceased returned on to the barge and recom-
menced fighting with the prisoner ; they had one round, and
in the struggle they both fell
.o7rbaard, Witness jumped
--t, and in,-

As usual foreign stocks were quite neglected, and
remain with scarcely a variation of priers. Mexican
were quoted 154 to 16. Spanish Fives, 15! to 61;
the Threes, 261 to 71. Dutch Two-and-a-Half per
Cents., 53 to 4 ; the Fours, 814 to 24. Danish,
794 to 84.
Advice, from Manchester report that the house
of Jones Loyd and Co., there, have issued a
' circular to their customers to the effect that,
as they were about to commence • new system of
business, they must insist upon all their accounts
being paid up. This is no new policy of that bank,
the novelty consists only in the circular publication
of it for the first time. For many years the Man-
chester Bank, which was the offspring of Manchester
charity as it may be fairly called, has acted thus to-
wards the Manchester trade.

The stringent note of Messrs. Jones Loyd and Co.,
of Manchester, referred to, brings to recollection some
particulars of the history of that bank heretofore pro-
mised. The present circular note is but in pursuance
of the policy long followed in unfortunate times by
the same bank, and now more perseveringly prose-
cuted than heretofore. Mr. Samuel Jones Loyd ap-
pears to be determined to carry this system out with
the banks dependent on himself, because it has failed
lamentably with the Bank of England and all other
banks. Let him take the consolation of acting the
master at home, since he can no longer act the
absurd part of the dictator abroad.
The story of the rise and progress of the great
bank of Jones Loyd and Co. forms of itself a re-
markable chapter in the history of credit and cur-
rency. The Bankers' Circular, in its too common
hap-hazard eagerness to strain inferences, has taken
facts too much at random. Whilst rectifying its facts,
it cannot but be agreeable to the celebrated firm of
H. B. and Co., who know, as Mr. Henry Brougham
(not then my lord) said of the Scotch, "a little of
every.thing, and not much of any thing," to be made
acquainted with the real incidents of the origin, the
advancement, and the unexampled prosperity of the
great bank, par excellence, of Manchester first, and
now of London as well. If H. B. and Co. know how
to improve the lesson well, the history of this bank
will be a standing text for the advantages of open
credit, and the duty of a " let alone" system of govern-
mental interference with credit

Somewhere about the year 1793 the sudden advent
of the war with France threw commercial affairs into
confusion, and es a consequence monetary as well. A
great banking house, Livesey, Allen, and Co., we be-
lieve, was the name, a bank of issue as well, esta-
blished in Manchester, became a victim to the crisis
of the day, or to its own imprudence of over-banking.
It stopped payment, and so great was the panic occa-
sioned by the event, so severe the distress occasioned
by it, that a public meeting in that town was called,
at which it was resolved, that in future no local notes
should be admitted to circulation, and no bank en-
couraged which should attempt to issue them.
The difficulty of obtaining banking facilities brought
Messrs. Jones's into notice, then keeping a teadealer's
if not grocer's shop. They bad been accustomed to
make use of their ready money over the counter to
discount bills, and were much respected.
In those early days (before 1793) they had already,
and a singular instance it was, appreciated the advan-
tage of not leaving ready money idle, and of extract-
ing interest, short as it might be, from it. The bills
thus discounted were equally available with and ac-
ceptable to the London tea-dealer's traveller
when he came round for payment and orders as
a bank note. The firm had prudentially and properly
turned the money to account meanwhile. They gained
a character and a credit thereupon far beyond the
capital in possession. Character in those days was
equal to capital.
The result of the public meeting referred to was
a request to Messrs. Jones to establish them-
selves as bankers at once and outright, as par-
tially they were already, with the proviso of
not Issuing notes; assurances of support were offered
on all hands, and particulariy by the most wealthy of
Manchester traders. They left their shop on the Es-
planade in consequence, and installed themselves in
the present premises of the bank, King-street, Man-
i cheater. They proceeded to open an account, in the
manner of country bankers, with the then London
banking firm of Vere, Lucadore, and Smart. The
drawings of the Jones's were enormous, because, being
inhibited the issue of notes, bills of the smallest deno-
minations at two and three months were required to
be substituted for local use. The London agency
of Vere, Lucadore, and Smart, none of the
partners of which had probably in that age
ever travelled beyond the sound of Bow bells, were
astounded at the immense quantity of bills sent ap
for acceptance and payment. They had calculated
upon Manchester, as upon the generality of small
country towns, whose banking affairs would be re-
solved by two or three thousand pounds a month.
Like the careful bankers of those days, who lived
thriftily in the upper stories of their offices, they
threw up the agency in a panic, and refused to accept
the bills of the Manchester bank. All Manchester
was again in consternation with bills returned and
unpaid, as Livetcy's notes were before. A pub-
lic meeting was held. Resolutions were passed
laffirming the credit of the Jones's, and pledg-
i g those present to their support. What was
more, the wealthy and well-doing parties sub-
scribed funds on loan for their support, and to carry
them through the difficulties of the crisis. If our re-
' membrance of the sayings of one who is now no more,
himself a subscriber, does not deceive us, the late and
the first Sir Robert Peel, father of the present, put
down his name for 20,0001. in support of the Joneses.
In fine, a large fund was raised by thousands and
hundreds, and the bank was rehabilitated. More-
over, such was the enthusiasm in its support,
'that two wealthy individuals of the name
of Barker went into co -partnership with the
Jones's, and the firm became Jones, Barkers, and Co.
The London: account was then transferred from Vere,
Lucadore, and Smart, who missed thereby a splendid
agency business which would have made them almost
the first of London bankers, to a small banking house
of (it' we remember what has been told us aright)
Daniel and Wm. Jones and Co., who carried on busi-
ness in Lothbury on about the same site where the
bank of Jones Loyd and Co. was then and is now
established. Daniel Jones and Co. dealt only in dis-
counts, however, and cared not for deposits. They
had accumulated a moderate capital and wished to
retire. They, were distantly related to the Jones's of
Manchester.

RNOLIBR TV N DR
Bank Stock, 1854 64 5 India Bonds. under gum 32 25
3 per CL Rod. Anm.., 824 13 4 I Consoh for Amt., 834 3e
314Pe.' 37pere'nji. AATne.'ll4%4tt3ipi
nnik. exp. Jan.s lies. -.18 I Ditto X. 509, .12 6 5 die.
India Stock, 2:74 • Ditto Small. S die. 3 pm. 5 Pm.
FORICION FUNDS.
3 per Cont. Danish Rondo, 1825. 7PI ' 3 pm Ct. Spaniel" Bonds, Amt. Nov.
6 per Ct. Mexican. 1846, AOrt. Nov. 16. ri 8
Id, 154 24_ per Cent. Venezuela Bonds,
4 octet. Forturnem Rip.. Acct. 214 321 3 I
6 Ker CL
itsanish Ronda, di, from 24 per Cent. Dutch Exchange, 12
Doll.. 531
ICRANORS AND STOCKS ABROAD.
MADRID. Nov. I.—Three pee Ceuta, 264 cash, /7 at days Four per
Cents., 164 mob ; Five per Cenu., 16 paper, 154 matt ; ressives. 5 m.h
64 paper_ Coo nor, 114 cash Bank of St. Ferdinand, 124 paper ; Bonk
of St. Isabella, 112. Keetange on London. 46 75.100.
The Liverpool Albion of to-day, in reference to the bank-
ing affait a of that town, says:—
The ultimate Lite of the North and South Wales Rank and the
Limpool Banking Company's ntuiblishments is etill undecided. Tte
manager of the former, ldr. Rae, Ass returned to town from the
metropolis, where with a deputation of the director. he has been
during the week endeavouring to arrange for the re-opening of the
estahlphment ; and on Saturday afternoon a meeting of the directors
woe held. But the result has not yet teen aloertaioed and in the
absence of the announcement anticipsted the/ the beak will shortly
resuroe we may turn with pleasure to the meeting, Mil en Wednesday,
at Denbigh, of parties in that vicinity i nterested he thebtalt, at which re.
mini ions of confklence in the estahludnama wan eineelhatelay edopted
be an influential body of the inhatiteatia and en tithe esensite a
circular letter trent the bead meager la ILherpael yes read. as-
Roaming that theiproprietors would be speedily celled lagethse, and