The Express.
London, England, 1847-12-09 00:00:00

SPORTING.

BETTING AT MANCTIESTEIL—Trxma.
WOLTIIETWILPTON STEEPLE CRAM —9 to 1 eget The
Bwltabor (t).
CHESTER. Cow.-1,000 to 15 silt Sir Tstton Sykes, LW
to 16 apt Newman.
DEESY.-10 to 1 sgst Surplice, 12 to 1 eget Glendower,
16 to 1 apt Optima Jack, 10 to 1 mg Amnon, 30 to I apt Stinger, 23
to I apt Betroths, 33 to I apt Beanbag., 33 to 1 stet Oerene, 40 to 1
apt Scoolyst, 40 to 1 apt Me Octiltree.

Eat intelttstnce.
EQUITY COURTS.
Behr* the Mader of the PAU&
ATT*OOD o. W11.111.-BTOCIL-JOBEING TILL

Mr. i,;;;;4p Jr 7.1,71:;;;;;;..
ported in this journal on the 2nd inst. and are shortly as
follows:—Mr. John Attwood, the plaintiff, employed the
defendant, Mr. Wells, who was a stock-jobber on the Lon-
don Exchange, to buy and sell stock for him by way of spe-
culation, daring the years 1845 and 1846, in the COUTO, of
which Mr. Attwieod became indebted to the defendant in the
sum of 40,0001. or thereabouts, for money lent to him, and
alao in a balance of 1,4001. on the jobbing transactions. Mr.
Attwood deposited Buenos Ayres Bonds, railway share., and
other like securities with the defendant as a security for the
money due on the loan accounts. The defendant, in April
and May last, sold these securities and applied the proceeds
towards payment of the money due on the loan account, and
brought an action for the balance, which exceeded 2,0001.
'Mr. Attwood thereupon filed this bill to restrain the action,
land he obtained an injunction for that purpose. The
' defendant having put in his answer to the bill, the
plaintiff now showed cause on the merits disclosed
by the answer why this Injunction should not be
dissolved. The equity relied on by the plaintiff was, that in
Jan. last he offered to pay the money due on the loan ae-
I count, but the defendant refused to give up the securities
without ha wu also paid what was due on the stock-jobbing
amount, and for which the securities were not given. This
we. denied by the answer, in which the defendant gave a
very different account of the matter. There was also •
question raised, whether, by the custom of the Stock Ex-
&inge, the defendant could legally sell the securities depo-
sited with him, without notice to the plaintiff, end formal
demand of payment ; but this point was not decided, the
Master of the Rolla being of opinion that, having regard to
the statements in the answer. he ought not to interfere, and
dissolved the injunction.

Bekee the doodleadar diseases.
DIMING V. Tlie Gillet NOZTILICIN RAILWAY CoK.
PANT.—INJUNCTION TO BRITZLIN THI Dal=DU= FRAY
TAKING Posszeatote Or LAND.—Mr. Bothell ea& Mr. Met-
a& moved oz parte Olt bolo& of tho lain who were
the draws ol =Ulu property situate he , on
the ids of the Odd Nord= holiway, to mai do ads-
dry hen neforlng mysamino
slii=i ar ilhoaatig dr fir-
lee et their Isol. It neselletiese leg been
twig on rear the diiih Ile eanpeay we=
le the lama leselka, Ile_ phial& hoeing
I.IOOL, and _ elopes,' Wefts oily 1.11001.
die=
rehoel of the iphiliii to wept file MI, the
pee *era adios dat they Awn UM peeseenon nada ens
powers et their eat The pidatiffs, without
=4.lll:sai7 vod any further nodes, Elesereeed that although
BO UMW/ het been pea, id se bud Ward Imo, es di-