The Express.
London, England, 1847-08-12 00:00:00

SPORTING.

WOLVERHAMPTON RICE 8 —Triton*
The LADIEo' PURSE of 50!. wan won in tour beide by Mr.
Minor's Ilawkstore, el 31b, beating Ranthse, 7st 31b, Writ of Error,
7st 31b, and foar others.
WIDNEADAT.—PATRNELL HANDICAP Of 16 sm. each, 10
fti sad oily if ilMAred, with 30 added. miles. (23 subscribes,
eltobertson's Blackbird, let Olb (Whitehome) 1
Mr.flkerratt's Romance, Cat Sib (Tacker 2
Mr. Irwin's Patriot, Cot tub 'lf) 3
Won easy.
CHILLINOTON STAAEB Of 10 SOTS. each, with 50 added,
for 2-yr.old oolts, Set 71b, and Mlles, fat :31); winners this year, 21b
extra. T.Y.C. (IS subscrlbere.)
Mr. Irwin's King of Kildare (617) 1
Lard °Medal', Sh)lock (Mar 2
CLEVELAND Cur, by eubseziption of 10 eon. each, with
50 eddcd, the second to receive 20 on. 3 miles.
Duke of Cleveland nil Jocose (G. Whltehouee) 1
Mr. Melklam's Inheritress (Templeman) 2
6tol on Inheritress. Won by a length.
The ALBEIGHTON STAIRS wet, won by Mr..l. B. Mose-
-ley's Richard the Pint, beating two others.

GREAT BOAT RACE.
TM 'peat race between Robert and Thomas Coaaabsisit
ehemplen et the Thames and his brother), and Neery end
dpswairce.upon.Tre, for 200!., tared
i=. The
Maim teas had Putneythridge to Barker' de-
tente et let mien with the tale. The sorely ram was Mere
bin essenehe fa • pair.oar'd race, frequent Ns peeledel repitted
bet at ere scitmrreace upon the Loneon water. la vas aids% by
Me of the approaches to tie dareinpillsos. sad Mt parse
Me interest created by this 'rest AIIIIIIIIII d as
denner. The Chi:de Bared had beenchartereit tar miss Fs=
fast/r►etr. Eclipse, and Cardinal Welsey, had dm been pawl le
match. The shore on the hump des was sae
=l.lhlsweapectators ; Itutoey.eridge westwelt IneseedlaskeZ
the Peed Mali of water was Ada', studded with Wilt At "
migiogg ge twig, Mr. Gcedes, as uu.p.re for the Ogewheelhlrl
Ogee. tapes Pr the Cleepersi, end Mr. Upon, am yen nee-
nt the Lender Club, the referee, took Ode Peeee 111 the
palsies et Ms Harold. The Ocombd first wade
Mar ippartese afloat in a beautiful shyer, steered by
WSpry csirmia. In the CLupers' boa; llatelet was forward,
he end by Mother's weight, whkb 11. WM not correctly at.
eselein, append to be slightly over the of the Landman.
They wen steered by than brother, Thaws Omer, Odes=
pa of see They both :coked well. The use Aided at S
parer te eve, Ooombes beir ce the Awn, gide et IMO
eel qpneait on the Middlesex side of At ihrrllalit
sabes jumped away with a lead ; esL Redo te Wake,
to
away; and between the Star ant Oder and tlesen.
were than one ha/Agree and glty mike= the shattatt-
libleikeheat deneettis : clew. 0/the Celan.*** Clemberf tod
leadsadabout tea at Thewwwwwitharidge. The
raasisesSigths Wet
hee ewe wientbon be =serbeetis. e.
=Theentreaveared throughout to eseadnole pitta. at
AWL style differed irimially from weir Omer Mani •.
there vase went of alacrity is the *Wok toe peedeles,l
too lead oat at the watt, beim they Ned etre diPPeibi wid their 0,-

laments takett at least four strokes to their three. Bettiag had beam
strictly ewe before the .tart, but three minutes after it bead 7 lo t
could And no takers. The style of the fjo..mbes' was beautiful.

Lab, Entelltattra.
EQUITY COURT.
Before the nee.Cbaneellar ot England.

NICOLLS V. WOOLF.---INJUNCTION TO RESTRAIN TIMBAL&
OF TYE DEFENDANT'S PALEIVT ItEFUSED.—Tbis was=
plication on behalf of the plaintiff for an iuj unction to r
the defendant from advertising for sale anovercoat exhibited
in his windows under the title of " Woolf's Registered Llama
Cloth Paletot," on the ground that those words were cal-
culated to induce the public to purchase the defendsat's
coats under the belief that they were made by the plaintiff.
By the affidavit of the plaintiff it appeared that he had
registered an overcoat on the 11th of March, 1843, under the
Act for the Registration of Design., and bad since continued
to sell such articles under the title of " The Registered Pale-
tot;" and that the defendant Woolf, who resided within a few
doors of the plaintiff in Regent-street, had lately advertised
in his windows an overcoat with the before-mentioised.
superscription. The affidaeita on behalf of the defendant
were to the effect—that he had been in the habit of making
the stme description of coat for the last ten years, and that
within the loot two years he had set over them the word
paletot, which was the term under which such coats war*
now known; that he had also often prefixed the word
" registered," as there were other persons besides the plain-
tiff who bad registered coats, but that he bad always told hie
customers that his overcoat was not Nicoll's paletot. It was
else stated that the plaintiff had deceived the public in stating
that the cloth used by him was made from the llama, for in
fact, there was no such material, but the cloth used
was commonly sold and known as medium cloth.
It was contended for the plaintiff, that whatever right the
defendant might have to use the word " paletot," he bad no
right to use the word " registered," as that would lead the
public to believe his coats were made by the plaintiff ; that
this conduct was the same as taking the plaintifre trade
mark, and was calculated to injure the sale of his paletot.—
Mr. J. Parker and Mr. Southgate appeared for the plaintiff,
and Mr. Rolt and Mr. Lloyd for the defendant. —Toe Vies-
Chancellor, without hearing counsel for the defendant, said
the real question was, whether there had been an improper
use of the plaintiff 's title. The plaintiff had registered his
design in March, 1845, and had registered it as a design for
a coat. He had then bold such coats as " The Registered
Paletot;" the defendant had been selling his articles with
this title, " Woolf's Registered Llama Cloth Paletot." If the
plaintiff had a right to be protected in the use of his title, that
title was "The Registered Paletot." Now the defendant
bad used fire words, the first of which was not found
at all in the plaintiff's title ; then there was one word
before registered, and two words before paletot. His
Honour thought there was so great a difference between the
two titles that it was not a case for the interbirence of the
court. It was necessary in granting an injunction to prove
that some injury had been done to the plaiutiff by the con-
duct of the defendant, but he could not see that is this sae
the words used by the defendant were any invasion of the
plaintati's right. He should therefore refuse the injunctiorL,
but should direct the case to stand over, in order that the
plaintiff might bring his action at law.
The Vice-Chancellor stated that he should not sit again
during the long vacation.

!INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT.
Ix we WILLIAM PENNOCK AND WILLIAM
—" ARCADE& Anno."—These two care, were very similes.
Both the insolvents came from Yorkshire—ote from Scar..
borough and the other from Huddersfield. They met at a
coffee-house in the Old Bailey they took a walk into Hol-
born one day in July, and whilst partaking of some ale
were both arrested upon different suits, acd went to prism
together. They both employed the ri.uoe attorney, both
filed their proceedings at the same time, both were beard on.
the same day, and both opposed by counsel.—Mr. Cooke,
who opposed Elsworth, said therewas awonderful similarity
in the two eases. There were two mortgages fur 3001. earth,
and both schedules were defective in information.—The sae
of Pennock was adjourned for further evidence, as also the
case of Elsworth. Both were required to prove the detain-
ing creditors debts, and both adjourned to the 11th Septem-
ber.—lt was stated by the opposing counsel, that the court
would hear nothing further of the cases
IN RE Wx. 0113 SON.—RAILWAY PPE CLATION.—This
Insolvent was opposed on the part of ferry Mors. He
had been a boot-maker, and had specul dto some extent
in railway sharer. He had twice before taken the benefit of
the act—once in 183.5 and again in 1842. The complaint
now was that he had improperly contracted debts. The
learned commissioner remarked on the frequency of parties
coming to this court who had once bean discharged. He
(the commissioner) thought it should impress thi in with the
necessity of great caution in their dealings, but he had
found, from experience, that the easy way in which persons
were enabled to pass through this court, was an inileeement
for them to be callous of the interests of others. This was
a fit case for the operation of the discretionary clause, and
the insolvent was ordered to be remanded for five months
from the date of his Teethe( order.