The Express.
London, England, 1851-07-17 00:00:00

.I.iii;s7:4ll,Ailiiiiiossidemd it mat desirable that the

pot& should have on the cheapest terms the best appeal, ,
hat as far as be was swore, no ohjection had been made to
the present system, which had been established only two or
three sessions ago. Ile was not disposed to do anything
which was calculated to disturb the position of the superior
warts is Westminster.hall, or that of the bar practising in
thou omerte. lie considered it for the public interest that
the rights of the bar should be maintained, and its inde-
pendence upheld, the only limit in hi. opinion being, that
no
sacrifice of public interest should be allowed, even for
so desirable an object. Ile thought, as • general principle,
the appeal should lie not to a part of the courts but to the
whole courts ; but then the question arose, whether, though
It ought be for the good of the bar, it was for the convene.
ass of the public also that it should be an The question
was, whether the present appeal was satisfactory to the
riblit, sad hoped ft to the Attorney-Oencral and the right
ha. and Imeamil gratleman the chairman of the Poor-law
Beard, to sap whether, upon the whole, there was such •
want of preemption in the existing appellate tribunal, as to
melee umber all the circumstances, desirable to make the
AtillOrif EY-GENERAL thought the right hon.
bread did sot senectly understand what it was proposed
to do* no appeal was always to one or other of the
superior wwwb.hint there was • provision in order to obviate
the iseeseesisase sod delay which formerly arose in appeal
oleos from Ste seem of business in those courts that appeals
might be illepeseg of by a puisne judge out of term. That
pressen of Weiser dig not now exist. The alteration pro.
posed wield mho sat doe least difference to the bar one
way or tbe ether Nog to the suitor the only difference
wield be that, V tie appeal happened to arise when the
avert was aIS is imam when there was no such pressure
of busiasee Woe it seed prevent their attending to it, it
weld be aroma eat awe, instead of being referred to a
plisse judge es adds after term, and thus • delay of three
er four wads probably would be avoided. In point of es-
pouse then would be no difference, but in point of time
there would be a saving.
After sew seuversation, the clause was added to the bill.
Mr. CROWDER then moved the insertion of the follow-
ing clause And whereas doubts have arisen whether the
appeal given try 13 le 14 Vitt., e. 61, s. 14, lies in cams tried
bi the Comity Owe judge without a jury, be it declared
sad enaelsdV Miser petty shall be dissatisfied with
the detesmlinagen of **Comity Court judge in point of
i:ramme teed withsu or without • jury, such party
the rig perior courts."
utihis damete was she shied to the bal.
lit. CROWDER ant moved the imsertion of the follow-
ing dams: " And whereas kle ozpedisat to provide for the
remetal el dein edam maw awl UMW., e. s. 118 ;
Ms it eamehd diet asp es& dein sail ow •••••••• Ina
is roped thessof, WIT stir bstoes easy be
timoval the aid together sans Where ofaay
of the add oath or say isdp deems; oft seek ,
her as le the palms* at era sr %doping assay into
overt as sad mart or 'Ape alai dent; as/ who any
each dam, sugmas, or Mew shall be the mid
es_potito suet shall deal thenorldt is the ••••• mast, in
was with istatplaafao eases asking is the said
gIieMULLINOS objected to the clause it the
ground that it would increase the facility for bringing mass
into the superior cants.
The clause was withdrawn after a brief discussion.
Mr. Crowder's next amendment. which would give
• powet of appeal against interpleader orders, was also