The Express.
London, England, 1865-02-03 00:00:00

did. (Lesglimitiw_rheow Wants, bat I
El Wow" is " • (Laughter.) Imw hsa
shoat►" her . [Laughter.)
—Do you know the Waterman's Arms it
Warne?
Witsess—Useesunasly well. (Laughter.) I was sell
lifer
there era with Warns. My statement was tikes at
beam I never west with him to the Anerkas Orinsars.
I made saparstenos st the Dow Carle path*.
here at Calais. I never saw Mr. Ramble in with
Mr. Hews. I sever bard that Mr. Pearson was tie ewer.
Mr. Ramble at Sri dieted that he hired ma at Oshls,
yes. Westold him I should surentra him for my
I wont beak to the ship In Cairo harbour
the Ihst Benseast would sot ure and Brook to work
in her because we had War tow
sign artistes. I ewer in-
tended going out in • Confederate ship but oely os a kid
;rat( I have been paid 10a. a week ever dam to provost my
away to ms, sad I eirsuld like mother web a job.
t keep. me in beer, " grub" too. It is a nice bit ad
" crust." (Laughter.) Marley Beware, and Elpendiff
have brae paid 10a. a week err arse. We took to a num-
ber of bundles of hammock' beton having.
[The trial was proceeding when our report le[t.]

COURT OF COMMON PLRAS
9ittinp at Nisi Prim in iliddlesek.--(Befon Mr. Justin
Bylee and a Comma' Jury.)
WILIUNIIOI V. NALL AND ANOms.—ThurANN.
This was as action to recover drimo ea • tempest mon.
milted moo a plies of lead, pert of herd
Itellend's estate
at Kesel
Mr. Herlotoa, Q.C., and Yr. °Milts appeared for
the plalettff ; Yr. Prenticewas foe the ddeodaat, Mr.
Lambert ; sad the other deteodent suffered Judgment by
default.
The plaintiff wee an architect, the defesdant, Yr. Hall,
was a builder, sod Mr. Lambert bed embed se his mimes(
man. The plaintiff's ore was that LateHollemesendjanted a
lease of the lead to a Yr. emend
mortgagee which beam mastedßiar irenge. !hoopoe sad
Cram, who sold their interest to the plaintiff far 3,0001.
is 1664. Boon afterwards the plaintiff put up • fence round
the piece of laud, bet this hoes was palled down under
allied= of the defendants, sad the loin of this canti-
bated the trespass; compleised of.
These far the demos was that in 16158 a pimp named
Beestoe, who was iu en interest in that
La to Mr. Hai, wromrs• builder, had lately be-
muse bankrupt. The convoryanee to Robianan was is
1962. The coesidmetion paid by Hell was 1,00111.,
sad the piece et lead was of peat importance to
him as farakidng _as outlet to some
=T.epee whisk he had spent 200,Veis
He bad eke laid rut a oonsiderable rasa in
:Imode la eirommioa with the lead is question, sad
2 dog cola pies* for the foessietien of a roma
publiaboase it.
Mr. Justice Belo mid the real quotion esemed to id= to
be whether the plaintiff was in pommies wham the trespass
was committed. I.lpoe this question was strong wi-
dows in favour of the plaistiff, sad ell the deeds elbowing
a title were produced ; whilst on the other side, the does-
Theich ltad been spoken about were sot produced.
jury found for the plaintiff —Damage, 21/. 10e.

COURT OF FICRIQUER.
Bitting, at Nisi Prius.—(Bratare Ni. Berm Bramwell
lad Ocatroos Jury.)
RODGINI V. =CUR.
This was a rather peculiar ease. The adios wee brought
for room int, sad alas for the value of metals Arsuma's
madonna, api r.. lied emus Miser articles. TM deteadaet
pl eaded a k of.t
Mr. Serfeas as
Basotho sad Mr. Robison were mural
f!ir the plaiotilt ; sad Mr. Butler Rigby rooducted the

defame:
The plastid, Mr. Frederick Hodges wee the proprietor of
a well knows distillery is Lambeth, and had for some yam
kept at %sown express from philanthropionotives samba.
whish had bees of great use is eatingaislilag tree Is
metropolis. At the (netlike is T olreet, is Amp*
1861, he Immune first emulated with sir drioaroat, who
was • working engraver. Their %Mae being eoegeeial is
the natter of fires an istimacy mining rip between them.
sad the result was that the plastid appointed the &-
feudist lieutenant of his bripde. For some time the de-
fendant pm hie pervious gratuitoesly, but ultimately the
plaintiff allowed him 1501. a year. He also finished kiss
with three uniforms, the cod of which wm 401., and in
order that he might be malt all hours of the dm and
sight to Mart with the when their NeViCall IMO
required, he was pored to occupy moms at the die-
Unsay rest tree. Once the drfeadant got into prudery
Madam, and bad some of his property
seim sad the
plastid lest him 301. to pay off the amount of the ere-
%Mom He also lest him mow at other times. It
appeared that some of the inhabitants of the parish re-
solved to preen% the plaintiff with • testimonial in kbe
shape of • *sada sew steam are essies. The *Lath!
employed • Kr. Cooper to prepare the dodge for it,
rod his charge _ amounted to 111. Mosey wee
handed to the defendant to pay the acemat. but it was
never paid. sad • &arum from the county mart was levied
epee the plantars property foe the debt. The defendenffe
rows was that he bad given themoney to his trother,vhe
bad omitted to take it to Cooper. Shortl airtervards the
plastid's ateritiaa was called to Perry's ia which
his same was aimed with whalers. TIM • Mad that
ou some rubsequest °cerise, at a firm he conceived that the
defendast had shows "madam uswarmatable in as ahem
under his comemail," sad he ordered him to quit hie see-
Mae. The isfeadankkowever, refused to ghee paseessioa
of kin rooms, and it was mid he bad to be e Ascoed-
Mg to the rules of the %fide al the aed mar is
bevies the efface were to return their saltorms to the
plastid.
Mr. Hodges was crormataral at some length by Mr.
Butler Rigby as to the defeadant's setoff, whieli cossited
chiefly of misty alleged to be due, and charges foe designing
sad engraving the plaintiff's crest sad arms for the brigade.
sedivanous other serviomaa well as plass for machinery. Om
of the items was for • drip for a flagotal fee the plaintiff's
marine residence at Margate. The plain", admitted
that he was called " the IC* of
_Margate, and that
whenever be west them he hoistid hil imbue cm the
flag mad at his " place I. truly royal style. He further
admitted that be bad ia his poomesimi some maehlarry
which the defendant deposited with him as meal* for
the 3131., sad that it might be worth 401. or yawl mare.
He was entirely smasisted with its "slam He denied
that be bad employed the defeadsat as his rivets @sem
tau, hits said lie had sometimes represented him ia that

~pep
poll re-examination, he said that a (mat deal of the
work charged for in the dafeadast's eat-off was for work
does by the dehodaot while he was his must at Knape%
and was dicing at his rabbi.
In reply to the learned Judge, he said the picture included
in his claim was the &gigs of the firresigine, and that if this
quarrel had not arisen be would have allowed the defendant
to keep it as a gift from himself.
Mr. Berissat Ballantine said that under these circum.
ANION be woad not go for the picture.
The defines was that more than the amount claimed
by the plaintiff was owing to the defendant. The expla-
nation w to the 111. was that the defendant gave tito
cheque to his brother to hand to and that a few
days afterwards his brother bust a blsCooper, od.veseel is the
street, and subsequently disk and that be never heard any-
thing more of the el:emu The defendant also said that
the uniforms were given to him by the plaintiff, and he
therefore claimed them as his:rw:ogirrormiyi..B4.The est-off
further included damages for al
Mr. Hodges, in reply to Mr. Baron Bramwell. said that
many of his obliques had pained through the defendant's
handy, and that this was the only &amity which had
arisen with regard to them.
It appeared that the defendant had brought an action for
against plaintiff. and that there wee a prospect of
rolutreri litiption between the parties.
The learned Baron, io summing up mid b. thought the
quarrel betweea the plaintiff and defendant was a very
unseen one, and he hoped there would be a settlement of
all differences.
The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. with 301.
damages. the uniforms to be returned to the plaintiff. with
the exception of • fishnet. They said thy cioneklared that
no imputation meted on Mr. Badger with regard to the 111.
cheque.
Mr. Baron Bramwell—Mr. Hodges said to the defendant.
his lieutenant, " Henceforth be no officer of mina." I do net
know whether he can now add, " I love thee MUM'
(Laughter.) Cannot some amicable arrangement be made
between them?
Mr. fierjeant Ballantios—The defendant hu brought an
action for trespass jointly against Mr. Hodges and his attor-
ney. and another Bolton for wrongful disaiimal.
Ultimately the learned sarjeast said he would speak to
the plaintiff's attornies, and no doubt they would act on his
advice with a view tq a battlement.

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.
(Belay the Judge Ordinary.)
WM V. KW.
Dr. Watobey for the petitioner.
The respondeet married her in 1844, and they lived in
various parts or Landes till 1854, at which time be was the
manager of a pubho-honor. In that year be eloped with a
tellow-eervaat, aimed Elias Davis.
Deane nisi with oohs.
CROUCH V. CROUCH £SD KELLY.
Mr. Hodgman for the petitioner, who married the respond-
ent, in 191511. He was a watchmaker to London, and after-
wards la osmbridge. The respondent subsequently became
addicted to drink, and t►tm led to her rata.
Deane all end ameba

A Nov, Cantor nre Diemirea.—The Hartle-
pool borough Mash were on Tuohy sepia for same then
is bony a maws' against a riveter memed Wu& for
wilfully setting on ire a chimney is his home. The &be.
Shot had quarrelled with his wile about bar abeam wed
would ere allow Dar to wear ear He leek II tows
th.bar
put her cat dthe beam, bed this deliberately poised
Westin, rip the chimney sad me firs to it by yeaperiya a
Wilall imp ia the keyless, width sot the chlmission
a ilts home kid Ida de was liable to a enmity al
al., MA they only Wises& a las of lea became of the
novelty of the elm
Poors.—A poor-rate, of Is. 4d. in the pound,
wse eseammil by. the Irmo\ co Thursday. This is the
lowest prervate that baa bean in this parish for a quarter
el a nestary.—Dorset Chrowicle.