The Express.
London, England, 1865-04-22 00:00:00

-et-t
. LATEST INWLIAGENCE.
WV INTALLWINCE.
_____;....___ MSS DAY.)
-: SLESWIG HOLSTEIN. —.--
The Temps hsa the following : ' COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.
~ We have received, direct from Vienna, a piece MUM, in Jam---Tote..• ilArd Ode Au** Ciwkim"
of news of the highest importance. The russian and Justices megabits, Mellor, and Sim)
government has proposed to Austria to convoke mi. wood mandalforPAßThe
naomainiimillillte°l4.
an
sumo,
et
the national representation (universal suffrage is the court to show canes why be net be struck off
probably meant) of Sleewig Holstein to deliberate on tii• ran in consicultst of misconduct and the stimPPlien-
tion of money. At the latter sad of 1862 the attorney was
the future destiny of the Duchies. Austria's mi,k,„ci by th„pplimat to o„dmit a mammy mot,
answer is not yet known." which in she sad was communised, the applicantat
to take 2004 upon the andiestaedieg that the s
bill el costs and other charges would holdout 8131. The
was paid to him in November, 1883, sad the applicant bad
received in driblets 501. Afterwards the stung sen him
In a cash account and his bill of mete, leaving • holism of
41. Oa. 4d. in the applicant's favour. The bill of mete
&gild not Its Mud Weems it was dimwitted that the at-
torney bad practised without a certificate from 1856
to 1864 exclusive. An action was then brought against
the attoreetaziwonben heocusented to a judge's order for 1641.,
but ea out usention he made himself a bankrupt on
hi. own palltttiiiaaaaaa, and on the hearing, Mr. Commissioner
Pane sent him bask to prison for a month. Since 1864 he
bad Teesived kis certificate.
The Lord Chief Justice mid the matter bad been ex-
amined into by the Court of Bankruptcy. The attorney
bad been by that tribunvisited with punishment for
his improper conduct. The learned counsel had not shown
entlicientsmun ad! for his motion.
Rule
--- - ----

ROME.

-- -
The audience which the Pope has granted to
Duke de Peraigny, and the interview of the latter
with Cardinal Antonelli, are giving rise to many
comments and conjectures, against which the
Roman Correspondence hastens to protest. That
journal says :
Catholics will be easily persuaded of the absurdity of
all the versions which an attempt is now made to accredit
oa the subject of negotiations consented to by the
Conn of Rome. Simple common sense sual-
Meetly shows that the French government, having concluded
a oonventiou with Turin, the putting into a:sondes of the
stipulations must before all be expected. To endeavour to
represent France as in pursuit of frail projects is in a
omega measure unbecoming ; and to do so is to refsse to
her policy the merit of constancy and firmness. To suppose
that diplomatists are incemmtly tormenting the Pops to
grant, after the act has been accomplished. an assent with
which they thought fit to diapeose in signing the treaty of
the 15th of September, is nonsense. The representatives
of Frame may summed each other at Rome ; the Pontilleal
Court will receive them all with equal politeness. and. an-
carding to the remakes, will either maintain similar lan-
guage or oppose the aurae elleme.
The Perseveranat of Milan states, on what it
considers good authority, that, to meet the in-
creasing necessities of the church, persons belong-
ing to the Pontifical Court have been sent into all
the dioceses of Tuscany to open a subscription
among the curds, each of whom is expected to
contribute 80fr. Those who cannot give that sum
at once are expected to pay 3fr. per month for 30
months. In one diocese containing 52 curie only
two refused to subscribe. The subscription is
inducted with a certain mystery.

ORM v. 010V28.
Mr. H. T. Cole said this was an *Mica tried before Mr.
Baron Channel at Bristol, when the jury returned • verdict
for the plaintiff, damages 811. Os. 2d. He moved fur •
rule for • new total, on the pound of misdirection, that
the verdict was agtnst Ovid•DOe, and that the damages
ware excessive. The action was for • breach of warranty
with reference to 200 lambs purchased by the plaintiff in
Jam last at btowford Fair from the defendant.
The court said they would roundt the learned judge who
tried the cam
LAM' V. TM NOSTIPWIIBTIEN ILLILIUT COILPANT.
Mr. Edward James. Q.C., said this was ea settee tried
at Liverpool before Mr. Justice ghee, when • verdict was
taken by arraegemeat for 1001. if the plaintiff could
recover. It was a running down case, whereby the
plaistiff's hone was killed, and the 'lorry" destroyed
when canning the dsferdant's railway, through the
negligence of their servants. Be moved for a new
trial9sod:l=d that the verdict was spinet evidence
The court granted the rule u what evidence only.
Rule nisi accordingly.

(=OTIS'S TILIORAMS. )
KING VICTOR EMMANUEL AND THE

POPE.

TURIN, Ann,.2l.