The Express.
London, England, 1847-03-20 00:00:00

UNIVERSITY AND CLERICAL NEWS.

Csweethos Moths I9.—At the etatutable non holden this
day, for the schniabion of inceptors in erns, the following degrees were
cceferred : 11.11—G. H. Mush, St. John's—M.A.—W. B. Hopkins,
Cain, J. Bluebell, jun., J. Hall. J. W. Loader, Corpue ; G. 1.
Bourier, King** (created M.A. this day) • E. Randolph, Jesus;
W. It. Girdieston, J. Parches, E. W. Wilkinson, A. H. Wrangel.,
Christ'. ; 0. W. Hemming, R. R. Tutitho, St. John's ; T. P. Broad.
mead, W. G. Clark, J. Holmes, U. Kerry, G. Rol trick, J. Richards,
Trinity ,• J. W. Nicholson, Emmanuel ; W. M. Maw, Mary (created
this day).—M.A. (ad nottten).—L. Pager Trin. Coll., Dublin.
The ranee imaged in Wednesday's Daily New passed the senate.
It arm nee.placerell in the White liood,honne, the munchers being
pinny II ; rsoos-plavt 7.
Henry Owning, P.n., the senior enquire Bedel, ls still suflbring
severely from hie late aocident.
The Res E. It Luken, rector of Buttes, near Lincoln, ta a condi.
date for the profersorehippf polltial coommay at Oxford. The election
is Seed for the Sard inst.
Vaesincma—lissltngbeid V. Camb,4lo. Ely; 5501.: pat. C.
Mitchell, Eaq.; and Lynn Regis, St. Margaret r. St. Nicholas, P. C.,
Norfolk. dl o. Norwich; l 5&.: pats. the and C. of Nornbch—both
vthant by the death of the Rev. S. Allen. Berwick ; St. James V.;
541..• pat. Lord Athibur• on and Wine...bourne Stoke V.; 1727. with
residence : pat. I.ord Anhbarion ; bothin the co. of Wil and Mo. of
Salisbury, and vacant by the death of the Rev. 8. Settle.
Peessmanorr.—Rev. J. Hemmen, lA., to Clifton P.C., din.
Moue. ; value 7821. ; vacant by dentin of v. J. Throe ; w hie (Mr,
Henernan's) petition as patron for this.

o.#

NAVAL
Bonne Mows.—Notice Is hereby given to the eidoem and com-
pany M her Majesty's ship Star, It. J. W. Dunlop, thq., Corn., that an
amount of the moiety of the proceeds and of the bounty money on
the teenage of the Brasillan slam whooners, Rafael, captured March
pt, Isis, ...it mmerea, =mitred April 17, 1615, will be &putted in
the reeletry of the Web Court of Admiralty, on or before April 19
next, agreeably to act of parliament

_
SPORTI
GREAT WILTSHIRE P/CIVRE 00U1SLNG MEETING.
Timer.
Eareow Hat Breams (ccatturied.)—Kr. Miller's Magician ,Ait me.
blorant's Minstrel.
Flan Ttte.—"erne best Magician; Eaglet best Wocellark ; swat
Consort best Hector.
Tee DZCID Orsaas.—Paccolo Twe--Seidlita beet Placebo ; Casuist
lest Seenrood.
Dermas Prsans.—Siwowo Tiss.—Twi'.ight beat Wild Arr ; Mis-
chief brat Lord George.
Swimmer. Brans.—Secorre Tos.—Bakeetub beat Windfall;
Smoggier Bill brat Native Industry.
EVIALCION STADAM—Htewto Tim—Helen beat Rushlight ; Wyan-
dotte beat Tboresway lam.
LEAMINGTON MILTeART STEEPLE CHASE.--Panosr.
Waimea @Texas of 10 sow. each. lift. list 7lb web.
Lieut. J. Leslie's Chace (Owner) 1
Lieut. M. Joluistons ad Seven Stars (Mr. Heaketh) 2
Capt. W. Allen's Plougbboy raisLltile)
Capt. Gambler's Org ( Powell) 4
2tol NW Plougliboy and Charon. Won way by lengths.
HANDICAP ofd sore each, I ft. I mile ands die (I WU), "awes is
two beat., by Mr. Noel'. Lopes, I Ist 71b (owner), beating Grey,
Water Lily, Mortgage.aod Goer, easily.

Cato inteltigcnct.
EQUITY COURTS.
Brion the Masora( the Rolle
ELDERTON e. LACIL—As TO VALIDITY OF ANNUITY—
AND POWER OF OFFICER IN TEE CUSTOMS TO CHARGE
Ria PaNSlON.—CONeiliecriett NOTICI.—This suit Was Mai.
tuted to recover the arrears of an annuity of 1951.195., granted
in April, 1839, to the plaintiff' Sarah, Esther, and Sophia
Elderton, by Mr. John Lack, formerly Examiner-General at
the Board of Customs. Mr. Lack charged his salary and a
pension of 1,0001. a year, to which on retirement he would be-
come entitled, as a security for the annuity. Mr. Lac it retired in
1840, and subsequently to his retirement he charged his pen-
non as a security for another annuity granted to the defend-
ant, the Rev. Charles Rankers Hall. The snit was resisted
by Mr. Lack, on the ground that the annuity deed was in-
valid, first, on the ground of public policy, and secondly, on
the ground that the ceneideration was not, in compliance
with the Annuity Act, properly stated in the memorial. Mr.
Hall also disputed the validity of the plaintiffs' annuhy on
the latter ground, and he claimed priority over them on the
ground that he had lodged a power to receive the pension,
executed by Lack, with the Audit•office, before any notice
was given to the office of the plaintiffs' annuity. It appeared
that Mr. Henry ?derrick Enerten, nephew of the plain-
tiffs, the Misses Elderton, wes the solicitor of Mr. Lack,
and that in 1838 he negotiated the grant of
the plaintiff.' annuity, and prepared a deed which
wee executed in November of that year, whereby
an annuity of 2071. lls. wu granted to the plaintiffs,
in consideration of I,2ool.during the joint lives of Mr. I,
Lack and his son, John Edward Leek, who had a situation
of 4.501. a year in the office of the Board of Trade, and the
two made the nuselves liable for the payment of the annuity,
Mr. Lack assigning his rehire and his expected pension on
retirement as a security. This deed was executed and the
money paid, and a receipt for it endorsed on the deed. The
deed, however was afterwards by arrangement cancelled,
and another deed wee in April, 1839, prepared and executed
by Mr. Leek, which was for the most part a copy of the
other, but the amount of the annuity was reduced to
1951. 19s. and was granted for the life of Mr. John Lack
only, and consideration was stated to be not merely the
payment of the 1,2001. but also the cancellation of the
former deed. A memorial of this, but not of the former
deed, was duly enrolled, in which the consideration
was simply stated to be 1,2001. IR 1840. Mr.
Elderton entered into partnership with Mr. Phillott,
who was the friend and solicitor of the defendant Hall,
and wu entrusted by him to lay out some money. And
Elderton iatlueed Phillott to advance some of this money, to
the amount of 5,0001., to Lack, who gave bills of exchange
for it, which were indorsed by Itiderton; and in September,
1842, the annuity which he claimed was ranted to him, as a
security for the adeanees to Lack, and the bills of exchange
were cancelled. The deed of grant wu prepared by Elderton
and Phillott, and in it no mention was made of the plaintiffs
annuity, and Lack was made to euvelant that he had not in-
cumbered his pension. And Lack afterwards granted the
power to Phillott, as Hall's agent, to receive his pension.
Under the above eireumstances,the objection that the charge
of annuity to the plaintiffs on Lack's pension was against
public policy, proceeded on the principles usually urged in
these caste, that it deprived a public servant of those emolu-
ments which were awarded to him as an inducement to good
conduct, and deprived him of that competence which hie
position required. The objection to the memorial was
founded on this, that it stated the consideration of the
annuity of 1951. 198. to have been the 1,2001.,
whereas, in fact, it was granted in consideration
of , the cancellation of the deed of 1838. It wu
also urged by the plaintiffs that Hall must be taken to have
had constructive notice of the plaintiffs' annu through his
solicitors, because Elderton knew of it and Phillott must he
presumed to have learnt it from his partner, although he
was not actually concerned in the grant of it, especially as
there were entries in the partnership books which showed
that an annuity wu payable bs Lack to the plaintiffs. But
on the other side it was said that Phillott could no t be presumed
to have had a knowledge of matters transacted Were he be-
came a partner with Elderton, and that there was no evi-
dence that he had actually such knowledge. Besides, it was
urged that it was Elderton'a duty to have told Phillott of the
annuity to his aunts, and at all event. he ought Jut to have
allowed Lack to have covenanted that there wee no incum-
brance when he knew of the former annuity. It should be
stated that Elderton was a co-plaintiff, as trustee of the an-
nuity granted to his aunts.
Messrs. Turner and Elderton were for the plaintiffs;
Messrs. Rindersley and Stinton for Lack; and Messrs. Lee
and Hesithfield for Hall. The case was not concluded.

ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE.
HOME CIRCUIT.—MAIDSTONE, Mum' 19.
Clown
A MA I@ WROSI NAYS to UNILNOWS.—ABSON.—A person
who it appeared bas since his apprehension ref= d to give
his name or any information respecting himself, and who
was described in the indictment as ' A man whose name is
unknown." was arraigned upon a charge of feloniously set-
ting fire to a stack of wheat, the property of Thomas
Macey.—Mr. Macey deputed that on Feb. 21 lie had a stack
i of wheat standing n a field near the high-road. He maw
the stack safe at half-past five o'clock, and between sewn
and eight o'clock he heard an alarm, end found that it was
is flames, and the whole stack was eventually consumed.—
George Wilson, a tailor, residing at Rochester, said he was on
his way home when he oburved the stack on fire, and when
he get up to it he saw the prisoner standing about 10 or 12
feet from the fire.—William M'Oeorge, a Rochester police-
man, said he was en duty in the High-street, about a quarter
to ton o'clock on the night of the fire, when the pri-
soner came up to him and asked him where the sta-
tion-house was. He asked him what he wanted, and
whether it was about • robbery, and he said it
was. They then went to the station-house together • and
when they were inside, the prisoner addrused the .46 in-
spector and said, " 1 suppose you have heard of the fire is
evening ? I am the person who did it."—John Tuff; the
superinteadent of the Rochester police, deposed that ia con-
sequence of a communication he received from the last wit-
ness, he went to the station-house, and found the prisoner in
custody ; and immediately he saw him he said that he had
come to give himself up for setting the stack on fire. He
asked him his name; but he refused to give it • and upon wit-
ness reminding him that it masa very serious cha and ask-
ing if he was aware of the consequences, he rep r ied that he
was perfectly aware what he was doing. After this caution
the prisoner made a statement, which witness took down in
writing, and said that he was at the Coach and Horses pub-
lic-house, near Rochester, and had some refreshment, on the
evening of the fire, and left the house about seven o'clock;
and as he was pining the field where the stack was, he
went in, and set the stack on fire with one lucifer match from
a box which be had in his pocket, and then threw the box and
the remainder of the matches into a hedge, about a hundred
yards from the stack. He then said that he keyed for some
time to we the fire, and afterwards went to Rochester to
give himself up. The prisoner then told him, that if he
made a search, he would find the lucifer
described. He asked the prisoner to sign the statement
be had taken down, tint he refused to do so, although he
said it was all true.—Chief Justice Wilde asked the witness
whether he found any money on the prisoner ?—He replied,
only one halfpenny. He added, that a starch was after-
wards made at the spot indicated by the prisoner, and a
Inciter box was found there, which he produeed.—The land-
lord of the public-house mentioned by the prisoner was then
examined, to show that he was at his house at the time he
stated, and evidence was also given of the finding of the
box of loafers in the kedge, close W the spot where the fire
happened.—A statement made by the prisoner while under
examination before the magistrate, was then put in, and it
appeared that upon that occasion he asserted his innuendo
of the charge, and said that his object in making the accusa-
tion against himself, was merely to obtain a night's lodging
and a breakfast.—This was the case for the prosecution.
The prisoner on being called upon fur his defence, addressed
the court, and said he would first explain why be had re-
fused to state his name, or to give any clue to his connexions.
Hs had two children, who had been brought up respectably
as he had been himself, and he did not wish them to know
that their father had stood at the bar of a court of justice as
a criminal. The prisoner then addressed the jury, and in
earnest terms asserted his innocence of the crime, and asked
whether it was likely that if he had really committed it, he
should have remained upon the spot afterward', or have
given himself up, when he might so easily have made his
wicape. He concluded by d=aring that, finding himself
without money, he was induced to make the thugs
against himself in order to obtain a night's lodging, expecting
to be discharged in the morning, and not having the least
idea that it would Le the means of placing him in his present
deCieding
flastice. *Wilde in summing up, said this was cer-
tainly a very extraordinary case, and but for the fact being
very well known that there had been many ease where por-
ous had charged themselves with crimes of which they were
entirely innocent, the confession of the prisoner might be
takes as conclusive against him. It wasthe duty of the jury,
however, to consider that statement with the one that heaow
made, and to look at all the ether circumstances of the case,
and then to say whether they considered that the charge
was clearly established against him. The conduct of the
prisoner had, no doubt, been most extraordinary. He was
certainly a man of some education, and his manners showed
that he had filled a respectable position in society ; and it up-
that he was an entire stranger in the neighbourhood,
rernrednothing whatever of the prosecutor, and therefore
could have had no motive of ill-will to induce him to commit
the Whom Both the Matearents made by the primmer were

very improbable ; but the jury would consider them together,
and sec whether, upon all the circumstances, they could
feel that tho guilt of the prisoner was clearly
proved. He concluded by observing that, if the verdict of
the jury should be adverse to the prisoner, he would have
no one to blame but himself for such • result —The juri,
after deliberating for a short time, returned a verdict, of
Not Gtalty.—Chief Justice Wilde said he thought 01'4 was
the safest conclusion to come to under the peculiar circum-
stances of the case, and, if he had been upon 'le jury, he
should have delivered the same verdict. The learned judge
then addressed the prisoner, and told him that he had tried
a very dangerous experiment, and he should advise him
never to repeat it.
Soon after the courts sat this morning, it was announced
that the six actions of ejectment, involving the question of
gavel-kind tenure, and in which Sir F. Thesiger and Sir F.
Kelly had been specially retained, would be postponed until
the next amines. In consequence of the state of business,
Mr. Serjeant Channel], at the request of the Lord Chief
Justice, disposed of several common jury causes in the record
room; aad Mr. Serjeant Dowling tried prisoners in the
grand jury room. The latter learned tenant set nearly
twelve hours yesterday and to-day, and the assistance thus
rendered was • great relief to the business of the assize, and
a saving of expense tothe county, by releasing • great num-
ber of witnesses. Before the postponement of the actions
above referred to was quite determined upon, the judges de-
cided upon adjourning the commencement of the business at
Lewes from Tuesday to Thursday next, and business will be
commenced on the latter day, in both courts, at nine o'clock.

OXFORD CIRCUIT.-STAFFORD, Manna 18.
Parts.—Before Yr. Justice Mask.
WARD AND ANOTHER V. DAVIS AND ANOTNai.—MATER
AND SIRVANT.-1,1 this awe the plaintiffs were poor men
in the employ of the defendants, who are large coal and iron
masters, and have works at Break Hay, in this county, and
the claim n which the action was commenced was in
respect of 331. 16s. for work done in the months of May and
three succeeding months of the last year. The species of
work was " hot straightening rails," to be used in the con-
struction of the permanent way of a certain railroad —Mr.
Serjeant Allen, with Mr. Kettle, appeared for the plaintiffs,
Mr. Serjeant Talfourd, with Mr. Skinner, represented the
defendants.—lt is the custom in iron-works to pay all the
workmen, through whose hands any work shall pass,
so much per ton for the work turned out in sale-
able order ; should the work done be unsaleable,
through the default of any workman, all forfeit their right
to be paid, as the ealculivron is only made on the quantity
that is saleable. In addition to this protection to tho masters,
it is generally understood to be the practice to make, by way
of tine, a deduction, at the discretion of the master, from the
actual earnings of the workman whose individual negligence
bad led to the spoiling of the material. It was mainly to
test the legality of this practice of fining, though ether points
arose, that the action was brought. The principal item was
with respect to 111. IGs. 16d. due on the settling-day, which
took place every fortnight. As it was usual to make advance'
during the fortnight, when settling day came 61. having been
paid, the master refused to pay the balance, withholding it
by way of fine; the other deductions were of the same sort.
It did not appear that at the time this fine was imposed,
there had been any estimate made of the loss sustained, nor
was there shown to be any scale by which the amount of
fine was to be ascertained. It appeared, however, in the
particular instance, that a loss of not less than 100/. had
been sustained, or rather an opportunity of profit to that
amount had been lost. The jury found a verdict for the
defendants, thereby supporting the fines under the circum-
stances, and to the amount at which they were imposed.

MIDLAND CIRCUIT.—DERBY, Martell 18.
CHARGE OP MURDERING • CHlLD.—Elisabeth Parker,.
wed 12 years, was charged with the murder of Sarah
Wardle, a child aged four months. Mr. Gale prosecuted, and
Mr. Wilmore defended. The prisoner was nursery-maid in
the service of John and Elisabeth Wardle, of Costner Park.
She had been in their service six weeks, when, on the morn-
ing of the 16th of last Oct,,ber, she was desired to take the
child out, which she did about eleven o'clock, and returned
in an hour with the child asleep. It awoke in half an hour,
and looked curious about the eyes, and it bad a smell about
the mouth ;it seemed to be in fits. The prisoner said she
had given it a sup of beer, and afterwards some ale. The
child continued to get worse, and died about three o'clock.
the following morning. The prisoner had always behaved
well to the child while in the presence of its mother. It
being suspected that some strong narcotic had been adminis-
tered, the prisoner was searched, and a small bottle found in
her pocket with the cork out that had contained laudanum.
A constable proved the girl had stated she bought a small
bottle of laudanum, that half of the contents she poured down
the child's throat, the other half she threw away. The con-
stable did not caution her as to what she said, and Mr. Jut-
, nee Patteson lectured him upon the impropriety of having
put any questions at all. Upon spear nsortentexamina-
,;on of the body being made, about two tea-spoonful
fluid was found in the stomach, one half
milk and the other laudanum. The quantity in
the stomach, supposing it to be laudanum, was suffi-
cient to cause the death of the child. The questions left
for the jury were, first, whether laudanum was admini-
stered at all; and if co, whether the child knew it to be
a deadly poison ? If she did not know that, hut still thought
she was doing a wrong act, the case would be reduced to
one of manslaughter. If she merely gave it to bring about
sleep, not knowing there was anything wrong in the act,
they would acquit her.
The javer ury, after
ct of con
otsultingOullty.ge tother for nearly an hour, re-
Thetud di N
Nisi Prins business finished about mid-day, but much
remains to be done on the criminal side of the court. The
case of Platte, for murder at Chesterfield, was proceeding
when we despatched our parcel.
It has been arranged, in consequence of the Fast day, that
no business is to be done at Coventry until Thursday, nor at
Warwick until Saturday.

WESTERN CIRCUIT.—EXETER, MARCH 18.
The commission of amino for the county of Devon was
opened yesterday afternoon by Mr. Justice Williams; and
this morning, his lordship and Mr, Justice Cromwell at-
tended divine service at the cathedral. At 12 o'clock the
business of the courts commenced Mr. Justice Cremwell
presiding at Nisi Prins, and Mr. Justice Williams on the
crown side. There are twenty-six mimes entered for trial, and
nine of them are marked for special juries. The calendar
contains the names of ninety-two prisoners, but the number
bas been increased toe hundred. In many ef the cases the
offences appear to be of a very serious nature, and there is
one charge of murder. The trial of the indictment (for
libel), preferred by the Bishop of Exeter against Mr. Lati-
mer, the editor of the Western Times, has been postponed
until the next assizes in consequence of the illness of the
Duke of Somerset, whose evidence is required for the de-
fence. The case had created considerable excitement in this
quarter, and many persons are complaining that the great
" attraction" of the present assiseshas been removed.

CROWN Coyr.—Before Mr. jmdae WWJarns.
POET-CITFICE ROBBERY.— WIS. Roger*, aged 27, a letter
carrier, attached to the Plymouth port-offiee, wen in.;
dieted for stealing a letter, containing two half-crowns, the
property of the Post-master General. There were Other
counts in the indictment varying the charge. Mx. Eogoonl
and Mr. Poulden for the prosecution ; Mr. Stone for the I
defence. On the 13th December, a person named Tatked„
residing at Fareham, wishing to send some money to Isle
sea, who wan a Airman on board ber Majesty's ship Cale-
donia, at Plymouth, desired another of his sons to write a
letter and to inclose therein two half-crowns. The letter,
cnetaining the sum mentioned, was directed to John Tat-
,thrd, on board the Caledonia, and ultimately posted at Fue-
ling' by the father. The letter ought, in due course, to hays
slashed its destination on the 15th December ; but the pen
loom to whom it was addressed never received it. Informs.
lion.was forwarded to the post-office at Plymouth, and sus-
pielon having fallen upon the prisoner (wham duty it was to
Sort letters as well as to deliver them), he was searched, and
the letter in question was found in his pocket, minus the two
halfarewns. Verdict—Guilty. The learned counsel for
the praeseution stated that there were other indictments
the primmer for similar offence', but the authorities
at the poet-ogles were not disposed to proceed with them.
Thu horsed jades inquired the amount of the prisoner's
laps. It apparel that he received 14s. a week. Son-
lowee—" Nevem years' transportation."

NORTHERN CIRCUIT.—YORIC, MARCH 18.
Crows Couar.—Before Mr. Baron Rolfe.
FOROERT OF • RAILWAY TRANSFER DEED AT Ham-
'al. —Joseph Corkin floatson wan charged with having, on
the 30th of July last, at Halifax, forged a transfer of twenty
shares of the Eastern Counties Railway Company, by a deed
purporting to be made by Robert Angletark Pilling, to
Alexander Hanson, brother to the prisoner, with intent to
defraud the said parties and others. Mr. Serjeant Wilkins,
Mr. Cowling, and Mr. Overend, were for the prosecution ;
Mr. Bliss, Mr. Hall, and Mr. Pickering, for the defence.—
In July last year, the prisoner, who was at that time a share-
broker, took a deed [produced In court by Berjeant Wilkins]
into his own counting-house, and then sent for two
little boys, one of whom offiCiatecl as a sort of clerk or
errand-boy for himself, and the other acted in the same
capacity for his brother. Having the deed folded up, he
went to one of these boys, and asked him to sign his name
on a partieular part of the deed, which he did ; he then
got the other boy to write the name " Robert A. Pilling,"
and alter that he went to his brother, Alexander Hoatson,
and obtained his signature as the transferee of this decd.
After this he obtained the signature of George Halliwell
Aked, as attesting witness to that of his brother, Alexander
Hoateon, which circumstance, coupled with the others,
SerjeantWilkins submitted, were of themselves sufficient to
convince the jury that the prisoner was himself conscious
that he was doing an illegal act, and owe which would sub-
ject him to danger. After succeedinr in prevailing upon
these two boys to assist him, unconsciously and innocently,
in giving to this document the appearance of a legal transac-
tion, the prisoner sent it to his stockbroker, Mr. Parkinson,
and requested him to forward it immediately to the company.
The secretary registered the shares ;they were sold, and the pro-
coeds, between 4001. and 6001., were paid ever to the prisoner.
After several witnesses had been examined in support of the
charge, Mr. Bliss spoke for the defence : Perhaps it might be
said that the geftzig et them twe boys to sign the document
was a waspi almematamm ; but he submitted that there
was toad mesh is that, berme they each signed in the pre-
miss ef the ease, sad demo was not from the beginning to
the matte king salwapt Mt disguise or secrecy, the body of
the Uric Wes draws sop in the prisoner's own hand-
writing, which wee porde* well known and must at once
be detected. The ewe Mesa ekes. Throwing aside the
brokers, Pilling was the seder, and the prisoner the
buyer. He employed Lama to buy for him two hundred
shares in the Eastern Counties Company, and Lucas sent
the eertilieates to him, as he furnished names and the
mousy. Before the 21st of September, 1045, there were 180
shares disposed of is this manner. After that time the re-
maining 20 shares were also sold by the prisoner, and he
received from Lucas the certificates. The transfer, however,
was kept back, and the consequence was, that the prisoner
who had meld the shares, could not deliver. Mr. Bliss con-

#

,
.

tetled that his dlent was the man who had been vexed and
annoyed—who bad been injured—who had the most cause
for complaint —The jury found the prisoner Guilty, but
strongly recommended him to mercy. The proeeeutor also
joined in the recommendation.—Baron Rolfe, in passing
sentence, said the prisoner had been convicted of a forgery,
which, practically, was not of a very aggravated character ;
and he (the learned judge) believed that he had been led to
commit it under the belief that no injury would result to
any one. Sentence—" To be imprisoned: for two calendar
months in York Csatle."