The Express.
London, England, 1846-12-17 00:00:00

THE EXPRESS, lIIURSDAY EVENING, DECEMBER 17, 1846.

Fee the Person Prise—King Henry Vs, act I,:esneo, Inn:- 4°l 1 fartfri,nga.
sum of
whichlti. produced,
billucedo,fwsidithe
othnethcroi.
ppsropeupirityn
had
tie wawa hand 'rah fight—te the weeds—« ell men borne WO he...e fuln.
:Ler t." T.rie.metrild.to.be Tragic-us fausSisasse Trimetrum Acute,- been spyen to the defendant, who received the pnsmeds and
.litescvnisis.Latin
pro.e
Tenkii4aresadto.b e aceetobnetua.tedt
wand. lecomboonattlHe 1;11,.% a memorandum was executed between the plaintiff and de-
fendant, by which it was acknowledged that all accounts
SiThe' I.re.will be congrega(Bations.
comon.the tollomezlng,
at 10;
the27,ensuitenn
; awuemsre,lottir e4whWichththael period,
asa!jg with
of the teheexpcelarntitoiffn'sdlifPesititecureslavt
March
Feb. farm .
23
17, ataltW.Ati Wednesday) March S. at 11 was to remain as a enmity. The defendant subsequently
The Crowe tcholaghip inceptor),
been arearded Ct-nd of
term),
fat Te.,. St. claimed to be entitled to the whole interest assigned by
Jobasa. Arthur Westmoreland, en datedar uagtundation this indenture, whereupon the plaintiff filed his bill, alleging
Fellow ot Jesus College. that the assignment was intended only as a security
.for
the moneys remaining due to the defendant, and praying
that the defendant might be declared a trustee for the plain-
tiff as to the surplus beyond that sum; and' the bill further
prayed that certain documents and hills of exchange in the
defendant's possession might he delivered up to he can-
celled, and that the defendant might be ordered to render an
account of all money due to him and received by him.
Much • vidence was produced on both sides. For the
plaintiff it was contended that he wasa man unused to busi-
ness, and had been imposed up in by the defendant. On the
other side, it was urged that the plaintiff had acted under
the advice of his son, the solicitor who had been concerned
in ell the proceedings, and that every transaction had been
conducted with perfect fairness between the parties.
Mr. Stuart, Mr. Rolt, and Mr. Hallett appealed for the
plaintiff; Mr. Bethel and Mr. Bacon for the defendant.
The Vice-Chancellor reserved his judgment.
Before Fire-Chancellor Wigram.
WILSON V. GOODMAN. CONTRIBUTION AMONGST
TRUATEES TO DEBT INCURRED IN THE TRUSTS.—The
plaintiff was a trustee under an act of parliament for making
and maintaining certain turnpike-roads in Yorkshire, and
the bill was filed against his co-trustees for contribution
towards a debt recovered from the plaintiff by bankers who
had advanced money under the orders of the trustees for the
purposes of the trust. All the defendants, except a Mr.
Hargrave, had admitted their liability to the claim.
The Vice-Chancellor now delivered judgment upon the
question of Hergrave's liability. His Honour said that after
reading the report of the trial by which the plaintiffaliability
had been established by the verdict of a jury, and the recent
decision upon the case of Wylde v. Hopkins, he felt by no
means certain that Hargrave would be entitled to exemption
from liability to the bankers, merely because they hal
recovered at law against Wilson. Though the question of
liability, as between Hargrave and the hankers, might be
doubtful, he unquestionably was nut liable as between him-
self and his co-trustees, except for a weekly rayment of eight
pounde, which the bankers had been directed to pay to the
surveyors of the roads, at a meeting at which Hargrave was
preseut. As to those sums, he was liable only rateably with
his eetrustees, and the amount of such liability would
scarcely exceed eight pounds.
His Honour dismissed the bill es against Hargrave, with
costs up to the hearing.
DALE T. HAMILTON.—STECIFIC PERPoRMANCE.—H6
Honour also delivered judgrner.t in this case, the arwument
upon which was heard early in November last. His Honour
said the object of the suit was to estAlish the plaintiff's title
to ens-third of certain lands at Birkenhead, in Cheshire,
which, by indenture dated in October, 1843, had been con-
veyed to the defendant, Hamilton, and one M'Adam,
as tenants in common in fee. The moiety of
Hamilton was still vested in hm ; and it appeared
that, upon the death of /41‘ Adam, his moiety
in the premises had passed to the devisees under his will,
who, together will Hamilton, were defendants upon
the record. The plaintiff's case was this.—He stated that
before and in the year 1843, he was a surveyor and land-
agent, at Birkenhead, of known experience in buying land,
laying it out, and selling it at a profit. 'Chat in 1849 the plain-
tiff end the late Robert M'Adam hail agreed to enter into a
joint speculation for the purchase and resale of lands upon '
the terms that M'Adam was to advance the capital re-
quired for the speculation; and that the plaintiff should
bestow his skill, and professional labour and services in car-
rying it on. Upon the had being re-sold, the capital, with
interest, was in the first instance to be repaid to M'Adam,
and the profit and lass arising out of the speculation was
to be made good between him and the plaintiff, in
be proportion of one-third by tho former and two-thirds
the latter. The land was. to be conveyed t Nl'Adam
f the benefit of both, in the same proportions. In 1849
the lands in question in the cause were purchased by
tne plaintiff, in the joint names, as he alleged, of him-
eel( and It. Sd'Adam, sad with a view to their joint specula-
tion ; but the conveyance was taken in the names of It.
M'Adam and the defend ,nt Hamilton, by whom the pur-
chase-money, amlunting to 62411., had been advanced in
• goal moieties. The plaintiff aid the the conveyance was
made in pursuance of the agreement between himself and
M'Adatii ; kola that alter such agreement was made, and
before the conveyance, it had be, ti ogre ed between Remit-
ton and M'Adam that the former ehoud share equally with
the latter in the profits and loss of his share in the specula-
, tion, the share of the plaintiff rsraaining as before; and that,
aecordingly a memorandum of agreement was drawn up and
signed by Hamilton and M` Adam, by which each of them agreed
to advance one-half of the purchase-money ; in consideration
of which they were each to have one-third of the said pur-
chase, and to receive one-third of the profits ; the remeining
Chid being reserved for Dale inlieu of commission for his
services in buying, selling, and laying out the land. The
agreement however stated, that it was distinctly and, estood
that Dale was to have no power or authority over the lands.
and should not be entitled to receive any compensation until
the whole had been sold and paid over, and the expenses of
the speculation deducted. On the 27th of Novembi r, 1843,
M'Adam delivered a copy of this document to the plaintiff;
and in Di comber, 1844, M'Adam died, having devlsed the
property in question to the defendsnts, other than Hamilten.
It appeared that at this time land at Birkenheadhad greatly
risen in value, the evidence showing that that which
was worth 6,0001. at the time of the alleged con-
tract between the plaintiff and M'Adam, was then
worth 25,0001. Upon the death of tit-Adam, Hamilton pro-
posed to divide the Lod, and a c inveyance having
been prepared, Dale applied to the defendants in substance
for what he claimed in the suit. Upon their refusing to
comply, the bill was filed, insisting that the plaintiff was
entitled to the benefit of the agreement as stated above,
and praying for a sale of the premises, and for the applica-
tion of the purchase-money in the manner pointed out by the
agreement. The case of the defendants was that the plain-
tiff had been employed as an agent in the speculation in
question, and was entitled only to remuneratton for his
services in buying, selling, and laying out the land ; and
they also relied upon the statute of frauds, as the alleged
agreement was not evidenced by any document in writing.
Assuming, his Honour said, that the ease made by the plain-
tiff had been established, there could be little doubt as to the
decree which the morality. and justice of the case
would require. The admissions in Hamilton's answer
as t the agreement between himself and M'Adam left no
doubt as to what the real intention of the parties was. The
land had risen in value to nearly 30,0001., and yet the plain-
tiff's right to participate in the profits was altogether denied
, If, however, the defendants were right in point of law, he
I could not, on merely moral grounds take upon himself to
alter what the law of the case might require. With refe-
rence to the defence grounded upon the statute of frauds, it
had been said, on behalf of the plaintiff, that there had been
acts of part performance which took the case out of the
operation of the statute of frauds. It appeared to hire, how-
ever, acts so relied on might be referred to agency on the
part of the plaintiff as well as to a contract giving him an
interest in the land. Another question was, whether the
case was not taken out of the statute by the circumstance
that the property in question was acquired and dealt with
as the stock-in-trade of persons in the situation of partners ;
and upon that point the only question was whether enough had
been proved to entitle the plaintiff to an inquiry. Upon the
objection that the alleged agreement was not supported by
a consideration, he would observe that an agree nent be-
tween two persons, one of whom furnished capital and the
other skill to make the capital available, was founded upon
a good consideration. The question of value, however, could
not he decided, but must be left to the parties themselves.
His Honour concluded by observi :g that, before he could do
justice to the parties in the cause, he must first ascertain the
truth of the facts by which their rights must be governed ;
and for that purpose two issues must be sent to law; the
first to inquire whether, before the 16th October, 1843, it
was agreed between the plaintiff and Mr. M'Adam, that
they should be jointly concerned in any speculations for
buying, improving, and selling land at Birkenhead ; and,
secondly, supposing the first issue to be found in the affir-
mative, whether it was one of the terms of such agreement
that the plaintiff should have no power or authority in
'stermining when the lands purchased in pursuance of such
-sent should be resold.

ORDINATION.—The Lord Bishop of Durham held a general ordina-
tion 3t Auckland Castle on Sunday last, the 13th inst., when the fol-
lowing gentlemen were admitted into holy orders : —Dseeorts—C. H.
Ford, 8.A., Univ., Durham; C. E. Tinley, 8.A., Unlv., rest;
J. A. L. Airey, RA., Pemb., Cam. P riest •--Rev. O. Hayton, MA.,
Univ., Durh.; Rm. J. Downing, BA., Corp. Chr., Cam. ; Rev H.
Bohlen, 8.A., Univ., Durham ; Rev. W. sewers, 8.A., Trin., Cam. •
Rev. J. Cl. Edwards, 8.A., Trio., Cam.; Rev. P.R. Maude, St. Bee..
Cumberland; Rev. J. B. Steel, BA , Eieter, Cam.; Be,. \V. Pea-
, thengonhaugh, M.A., Univ., Durham.
Vacurr.—lale of Alderney P.C., dim. Winchester, value 1201. ;
vacant by the nehructiono f the Rev. Vincent W. Ryan.

NAVAL.
PORTA:IIOMS, Doc. 11.—Toe Polyphemus and ?Inane still remain
at Spithead, awaiting orders. A company of marines embarked
on board the Penelope steamer, Captain Gifford, this morn-
ing fur service at the Island of Ascension. The Penelope
will now be ready in about • week. The Cyclops, Captain
Lapidge, is to base her defects made gbod in the yard, and will be
taken into dock to-morrow. The Leander, SO, designed by Mr.
Mille, late master >.hipwright of this yard, after long remaining in
un unfinished state, is now approaching completion. She is allowed
by all who have seen her to bid fair to be a fine frigate without that
tendency to roll heavily which has lately been complained of in our
ships. She is a most admirable midship form.
Wootwww, 16.—The Porcupine, s.v., Capt. F. Bullock,
arrived here yesterday from Ireland, with supernumeraries for the
Perseus, fiag-ehip, lying off the Tower. They were afterwards con-
veyed to London in the Charon, s.v.—The l'errible, eteam.frigate,
Capt. Ramsay, is expected here from Sheerness., to be docked, in order
to repair the copper on her bottom, which has been injureiL—The
114adamantlins, cr., will be out of the hands of the workmen this
week. —The Fearless, s.e. Master-Commander Brockman, left on
Monday for Sheerness, and Portsmouth.— It is stated that the number
of convicts employed in this yard will be augmented by an additional
draught of SOO from the Penitentiary, at Millbenk, to the system of
transportation to Van Diemen's Land is to be stopped for the present.
It is hoped that this will not have the effect of MI-411g the discharge
of the hundred labourers who were entered at this yard on the reduc-
tion of the convict establishment some time since.
APPOINTS'S:era —Aitairtstrr, DEC. ls.—Commander 11. Loring, to
Superb. Commander IL it. Foote, to study at the Royal Naval Col-
-1 ge, Portsmouth. Naval Instructors: It. Orem, to Canopus; M. T.
S. Kalmbach, to Queen. Midshipmen: A. Mitchell, to Queen ; G. J.
M. Shirred, to \Min. Naval Cadet W. T. Sterne, to Resistant'.
Lieut. T. Sallied, Chief Office* Costa Guard.

MILITAKY.
TntarT.Froar Foar.—The test divittion of this regimen.,
of one field-officer, one captain, two subalterns, one assiatantsurg.
three perjeanta, two drummers, and 166 rank and tile, under the
command of Major Garvock and Copt. Kelly, marched from f hatham
to Osprinee and Faversham, en route for Widmer, yesterday; and the
second division, convicting of one captain, two subalterns, four ter-
jeurita, three drummers, and 106 rank and tile, marched at the same
time, under the command of Capt. Greenwood, to Sittingbourne and
Milton. The head-quarters, consisting of the third and fourth divi-
sion., under the command of LieaL-CoL Spence, will follow this
morning (Thursday), to the same place.
Tug. Rem.imi or Liser..Gs..r. DiatinsON, late Colonel Comman-
dant of the 2nd battalion Royal Artillery, were removed on Tueaday
from his residenca at Notting-hill, and deposited in the catacombs at
Kenai-seen. The funeral was strictly private. The general had
held his commission 67 years.
ROYAL MILITAKY ACADEMY.—In oonrequence of the recent
attacks on the conduct of the cadets in this establishment which
have meently appeared in many of the daily paper*, the Hoard
of Ordnance hive deemed it necessaryto appoint a committee of
inquiry to inventi,tate the conduct of the cadets and the general regu-
lations of the estub li.hment, a. well as is present elate of discipline,
Rt. The court consists of M ijaw-Gen. Sir Wm. Gossett, C. 8., K.C.H.,
Royal Engineers (chairman) ; Major Sandham, R. 1., Brigade Major
of the Royal Sappers and Miners ; Major-Gen. J. B. Parker, CAL,
ILA., Lieutenant-Governor of the Academy, and two or three officers
of the Royal Artillery. The court has been sitting during the past and
present weeks, and still continues to delineratios. NotwithstundMu
the determination of the authorities to put a stop for the future to all
acts of irregularity Outlier to those which have been so severely de-
nounced, the students themselves still continue to pursue a line of
contort calculated to bring di.grape upon themselves and the institution
to which they belong. It is difficult (says a correspondent) to procure
information from an establishment, the doors of which are hermeti-
cally sealed to the public. In consequence of the irregularities of the Ca.
dile, after they have retired to r. at, the Lieut.-Governor has appointed
nn officer to visit the rooms of theagletatwiceon each evening ofterthe
hour for rest. A few evenings. since, the officer on going his rounds,
entered the first room, where he discovered the inmates, not in the
;Irma of Solana., but carousing round a gond tire, the table groaning
under a load of dee inters, filled with wines and otter luxurious
beveragee. The window was closed with blanket, as that all appa-
rently was dark-esa and quietness wkhiu. The officer was received
with a "hale fellow well met" sort of salutation, and was politely
requested to sit down awl join the company, an invitation which he of
course 'effused. The conduct of the cadets was reported to the
Lieut.-Governor, and those in charge of the moon were "put buck"
for a twelvernonth, which will have the effect of delaying the reetival
of their commiaaiona bythat space of time.
ESTRAORIDINARY FaSeal.: —The guernsey Star says: A fracas of
a very extraordinary nature took place-on Saturday evening laid at
Ilavilland-hall, the residence of Major-General W. P. Napier, the
Lieutenant-Governor of this island, between his excellency and Mr.
Wools, the ordnance storekeeper of Alderney, which terminated in the
forcible ejectment of the latter. Mr. Wools had call d on General
Napier to make an official communication respecting some act of duty
which Mr. Wools had been executing at Sark, in obedience to orders
given to him by the Board of Ordnance. The conversation became,
after a time, an altercation, and this led to an interchange of personal
acts of violence, which were terminated by Mr. Wools being forcibly
expelled from Ilavllland-hall by General Napier and his servants.
Complaint, in the course of the evening, was made by the Lieutenant.
Governor to the police, who arrested Mr. Wools, and exacted from him
bail to appear before the court to answer to the accusation. Accord-
ingly, on Monday, Mr. Wools, who was heated in full uniform, wan
brought by one of the constables of the town pariah before
the court, composed of the Bailiff. rue, and Mr. An-
des. On Mr. Wools being placed at the bar, Advocate
Tupper, who appeared on his behalf, said he wished to know what
his client was charged with! Queen's Comptroller : You hare
nothing to say—the case is going to be heard in private. Thin an-
nouncement led to some di-cuoaion, which was ended by the Bailiff
paying, Mr. Woo'a is charged with an assault on the Lieutenant-
Governor.—Mr. Tupper :We hear that such a charge is to be made ;
but Mr. Wools will prove to the court that the assitalt wan made on
him by a
butuaov and he
under'inend; entering a counter-
charge; as Mr. Wosils lllkt acting the Board of Ordnance,
he cannot proceed without their authority ; but be reserve. to himself
the right of doing to.—The Bailiff : No such reservation u necessary.
You have a right to take what steps you think proper. This is for
vour discretion. The court have nothing to do with it.—The wit-
Mopes no both aides were then sworn, and the court was cleared. At
six o'clock the m
ourt committed Mr. Wools for trial, Advocate Tupper
ball of 1601. fur his appearance.

SPORTING.
BETTING AT MANCIIE•iTER —Tv winsy.
etturra Cur.
0010 I seat Crlm eon (v.) 1000 ISsestllunroady.
50— 1 Erin-80 Ilt 10h. 1000 —l5 Kick. y Ftee.
10016— 13 L'lllmodellr Colt (I ‘, I 1000— 13 litrallen.
D.ST•
$ IstalYsntrmap. to Ilpaolltally Arrnstrotte (t;
13-1 lipirtote. 40 1 1111“/ Martm colt (t.)
10 1 rime, 40 1 led alert (L)
06 I Glontllc 40 1 Ilorn-,.f.Chase tt.)
28 1 Sister to Cobweb eolt. I 1 J. Day 6 lot (1.) . _-_-_—_
33-1 Lansdale.. ....ty
The L 66311303006 STVEPLit CllAStal are postponed until the latter end
of January or the beginning of February, the stakes to be re-opened.
11IN WAIXING-NLATC.I moo LrEll, 00 ilesnrorm.—Mountjoy, the
pedestrian, who commenced, on Monday, the arduous task of stalking
three times fIOM L+11.4 to Bradford and back each day br six days,
Fr.tVe up the task on Tuesday, in consequence of having tallen twice,
owing to the slipperiness of the road.

tab) Entelltgence.
JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY
COUNCIL.—YEiTE&UAT.
present —The Master of the Rolla, Lord Brougham, the Right Bon.
Dr. Lushington, and the Right Holt T. P. Leigh.
MITCHELL'S PATENT.—Mr. Wi lister applied to their
lordships to appoint a day for hearing this application for a
prolongation. This patent comprises screw-piles and screw-
moorings, the former having been applied in the construc-
tion of lighthouses and beacons on submarine b inks, and
the latter is in use in many of the ports and harbours of the

kingdom.
Lord Brougham said their lordships could not appoint any
day at preterit ; there were no his than three cases in the
paper of complaints against colonial judges, which must
take precedence, because, while they were pending, great
inconvenience must arise to the administration of justice in
those colonies, and as the patent did not expire until July,
this application did not press.
IN RE MAoxva Sierrn.—Mr. Moore was heard on a
petition for leave to appeal. The petitioner had practised as
an advocate and proctor in the courts of Sierra Leone, and
complained that he had been struck off the rolls, and pro-
hibited from practising, by the Chief Justice, without any
just cause. With regard to the Police Court the Chief
Justice had oreered that no advocates should be allowed to
practise in that court; for which he (Mr. Moore) submitted
the Chief Ju-tice could have no authority, and probably an
intimation from their lordships to Her Majesty's govern-
ment upon that sohject might have the desired effect. The
complainant stated that he had been excluded from the two
other courts, the Recorder's and the Vice Admiralty Courts,
on the ground that he had behaved disrespectfully to the
Chief Justice.
Lord Brougham inquired what was the particular act of
disrespect ?
Mr. Moore said it appeared from Mr. Smith's affidavit,
that, having gone to the Chief Justice's chambers with some
witnesses, that they might be sworn to an affidavit, the
Chief Justice refused to let the witnesses be sworn, and after
they had withdrawn, and when Mr. Smith was alone with
the Chief Justice, it was said he had misconducted himself.
Lord Brougham asked what was the nature of the mis-
conduct ?
Mr. Moore replied, that Mr. Smith had merely remon-
strated with the Chief Justice on his refusal to swear the
witnesses. It appeared, however, on reference to the tran-
script of the proceedings below, that an entry had been made
, by the Registrar, that upon some statement being made by
the Chief Justice in court, Mr. Smith said, " That is not
true."
Lord Brougham said, this was a disrespect amounting to a
contempt of court, which would be punished in this country.
After some further discussion, their lordships gave the ap-
plicant leave to appeal, and to set down the case for hearing
six months after service of the present order upon the re-
spondent.

Before Vice.Chanceltor Knight Bruce.
THOMAS v. PRILLIPB.—WANT OF CONSIDERATION FOR
CONTRACT OF SALE.—MISCONDUCT OF SOLICITOR.—The
bill was filed by James Thomas, a solicitor at Llandilo, in
Carmarthenshire, against the defendant Phillips, who was
the assignee of John Rayner under the Insolvent Debtors'
Act, and against Rayner and another party, who was mort-
gagee of the estate in question, praying the specific per-
formance of an agreement entered into for the sale to the
plaintiff of an estate belonging to Rayner. The bill wr
resisted by the defendants on the ground of fraud and cir-
cumvention on the part of the plaintiff. The circumstances,
in detail, will sufficiently appvar from the judgment.
Mr. Wigram and Mr. Daniel argued the cue at great
length on behalf of the plaintiff. At the close of the plaintiff's
case, his Honour asked whether, if he should not dismiss the
bill, the defendants' counsel were willing that the accounts
should be taken in the Master's office, and whether they
would be content to abide by the result of the accounts so
taken ?
Mr. Russell, on behalf of the defendanad to do eo.
His Honour then gave judgment. Hefei d that the
plaintiff was a solicitor at Llandilo, in Carmarthenshire. The
defendant, John Rayner, was an itinerant bookseller in that
part of the country, who was occasicually engaged as a clerk
or assistant at auctions, and otherwise in suck
matters; and, from the evidence, it appeared that
he was sufficiently intelligent fer his situation in life.
He appeared to have had a pieee of laud. together with a
small farm-house and out-buildings. consisting of rather
and
more than thirty acres, lying between Carmarthen
Llandilo. It let, his honour thought, at the time in question,
at a rent of 311. a wear. The tenant did not pay his rent re-
gularly, alleging that he paid too much. There appearednto
to
have been some timber on the property, which, taking i
value, did not
consideration the whole evidence as to
appear to ht too highly valued at 901. That, in, fast,
appeared to be a low valuation of the timberstate , . Twhe-
here
tint am great probability of coal being upon the e
ther or, the surface, or whether likely to be worked to ad-
vantage now or hereafter, did not distinctly appear. His
Honour was not satisfied on that subject. Rayner had
mortgaged this property for the sum of 5001. The mortgage
was held by a butcher in the neighbourhood. It a
eared
that that in the early part of the year 1838, being troubled,
his rent, or for some other reason, Rayner made an application
to the plaintiff, and his Honour saw no
said reason tri d
anusobt twerhato
t
what Mr. Williams, one of the witnesses, in
the third interrogatory, was correct. (His Honour

EQUITY COURTS.
Before the Vice-Chaneellor of England.
INSOLE O. FEATHERBTONIIADOII.—BILL TRANSACTIONS.
—ALLEOED UNFAIRNESS.—The plaintiff in this ease RSA a
farmer in Worcestershire, and requiring some years ago to
borrow money, he consulted with hi. goo, who was a solici-
tor in partnership with a Mr. Corbett. The plaintiff was
then introduced by Mr. Corbett to the defendant, who had
been a chemist at Worcester, and was in the habit of lending
money ; and in July, 1839, a bill for 1001. was discounted by
the defendant for the plaintiff. A great number of transac-
tions of a similar nature took place between the plaintiff and
defendant, from that period down to the month of March,
1841, when the plaintiff, having become indebted to the
defendant a considerable sum, executed an n
indentuee,
whereby he assigned his life interest in 1271. 10s. per arium
(1,4 t him by the will of his uncle) for the purpose of secur-
ing the sum which was then owing to the defendant,
and xll
000! further sums as the defendant might advance,
up to I,The plaintiff, shortly afterwards, became much
involved in his circumstances, and was obliged to sell his

I 1 to DO RULMM,4 VW mu 1 ...-
listinctly appear. His meet her at Calcutta and conduct ner to nu, rc.........• _
;object. Rayner bad awaited her arrival at Calcutta, and at last be discovered, by having a fainting fit, and Mr. teeming a•sesLe-se - •......._ ___
A 5001. The mortgage a letter whizh had been forwarded to the post-office, that she the servant in undressing her and putting her into bcd. Ha
urhood. It appeared had changed her mind, and that she did not think fit to join also procured medicine for her. He called ber by au
I,
being troubled. about him in India. His disappointment was of clurse exceed- christian name " Marian," but witness did not we by_
tier made an application ingly bitter. After a journey of 1,000 miles under an Indian anything with his lips." Witness remarked jst his presence,
no reason te doubt that sun, to find that his hopes were not to be realised was enough that sbe was the fittest person to attend a i‘rteed woman.
ewes, aid in answer to to &spirit the stoutest heart. She again proWsed to came to Mr. Ruding made no answer. Mr. Ituding,Aisvirig fetal's&
irrect. (His Honour tins; and again disappointed him. In the; year 1841 he die- the medicines, administered them himself. WYSlited bet
:\-c..
y.....t , •
....
1.._1k1 sY