The Express.
London, England, 1853-12-20 00:00:00

NAVAL.

ADMIRALTY, DEC. 19.—APPOINTMENTS.—Captain
R. L. Yarrow, to the Cressy, 80, screw steam-ship, at
Chatham.

Paymaster G. Grant (18.50), to the Juno, 26, at Sheerness,
Mate J. T. Pringle (1852), to the Boni:wen, 70, guard-
ship of ordinary, at Chatham.
Assistant Surgeon G. Hill (1816), to the Saracen brig, at
Devonport.
Assistant !Engineers J. Foster, A. Young, W. T. Fry
and C. Freeborn, to the Cyclops, 6, paddle-wheel steam-
frigate of 320-horse power, at Sheerness.
Midshipman G. R. Harvey, to the Sl. George, 120, guard-
ship of ordinary, at Devonport.
Naval Cadet G. N. Sma.lpage, to the Princess Royal,
90, screw steam-ship, at Portsmouth.
PROMOTION.—Chief Engineer R. Cooke (1847),
promoted to first elms.

SPORTING.

TATTERSALL'S—MoNnkr.

The room wu pretty well attended, but business was
still very limited.
Livuutoou STIMPLECHASE.—Despite the strong field
that will in all probability be found arrayed against Miss
Mowbray when the nominations are published, she was
again in high force—as little as 7 to 1 being taken.
CHIMES Cl:F.—Offers to lay 1,000 to 30 ages Virago,
and to take 2,000 to 50 ; 2,500 to 50 taken twice about
Tom (late Mountain Hawk). (By the way, as it is likely
there will be two Toms entered for this event, especial
care should be taken in booking beta respecting them.)
2,000 to 30 agst Newminater, and 1,000 to 10 each aget
Red Lion, Joe Miller, Talfourd, Muscovite, and Heapy,
wu laid.

DERBY.—King Tom again received strong supports
9to 1 was taken to 2001. • Autocrat was untouched ; 1,6.50
th 50 taken about Buiarcio; 1,000 to 30 and 500 to 15 An-
dover ; 1,000 to 25 Meteors ; 450 to 50 betted against John
Scott winning Derby and Oaks.
Notice—The room will not be opened on Monday nest,
the 26th instant.

[AdVetilllHlo3llt.] FIFTY THOUSAND GURU
lerretowr MIDKINS by Du Beaar's IiRTALUITA AIIADICA
Cure 110.832 Fifty yearn' Indeocribable agony from timeline,
servomincee, anima, cough, comitimitien, flatulence, "panne, eica.
den at the sumach, and vomiting', have been remove,{ by Du Berry's
eleellent fasd."—Harta Jolly, WOlll2lll, Ling. near Din, Norfolk.
Cure No. 71 of dyspepsia : from the Right lion. the Lord Stuart de
Decies:—" I have derived considerable bereft t nom your Food and
authorise the publicatan of these linee."--Stuert de Deena. Sold in
rarasters, 1 lb., at 2e. 9d.; 21b., at 4x. 6d 3 lb., at 111. ; It lb., at
231. Super-rented quality, lb its et 33e. ; 5 lb., at 22a.; the
and 12 lb. ea:Leiters Imo of carnage, by Beaty are MAIM and.;(s.„
77, Resteatagnet. Lenetel.

„
[Advertiseillenti--110LLOWAY'S OINTMENT AND
PILLS WONLIERYTILY EVOCACIOVIS lv Qaivo SC 10 ,O'LA, OLD
WOrt4 lA, AND BAL. Lace.—)tr. L. Fordyce, shoemaker, Forgve,
Aberdeenshire, suffered for a long time from a large wound in his
thigh, from which diseased portions of the hone came out. He was
at the Aberdeen Infirmary for several weeks, but la &Orme of the
treatment there adopted, he became AO much worse that the surgeon
advised him to have the limb amputated. On his objectingto this,
he wu discharged as Incurable, when he commenced using Iloilo.
wars Ointment and Pills, which have to effeetually mired biro that
he is elite tonal= hie work, sad now enjoys most excellent heath.
—Sold by drilegists, sad at Professor Holloway's Establishment.
144,11Issad.lhadca.

'Law futtlitacnce.

EQUITY COURTS.—YEbr EMMY.
b. Lti in. WIM JUITIC.II M Arrbat..

ALLsorr C. LOUIIIIO4 ANU Yit.►b

Their lordships delivered their judgment in this ease. a
report of which upon the argument was given in the boas
Deers of November, the 2Gth. The object of the appeal
motion was to rarest the decision of the Master of the
Rolls refusitqr to dissolve an injunction granted by MM, re-
straining the defendant Fraser from selling spurious
beer under the name of " Allocpp's Ale.," or •• Ail.
101101 l'ale Ale." and from using the plaintiff 'a
name or labels in the sale of beer, not being that
of the plaintiff's manufacture. The defendant Fraser's
ground for dissolving the injunction was that. although
beer had been sold by Coombe* to one King, in the way
complained of by the plaintiff, aim had been labelled with
the plaintiff labels in the defendant Fraser's cellars, yet
this had Lien done without the defendant Frascr's know.
ledge by the defendant Coombis, whom he had em-
ployed as bottler, in pursuance of a scheme between
Coombee and King, who was empl yed as a spy by the
plaintiffs, for the purpose of euabliug the plaintiff, to obtain
an injunction against the defendant Fraser. As Fraser
alleged that he never intended, and did not intend, to do
any of the act• complained of by the plaintiff.• the object
of the !anti n to dissolve was merely to avoid the payments
of the costs of the proceedings, and also to set Fraser right
in point of character, having regard to the stigma fixed
upon him by the order for the injunction.
Their Lordships were of opinion that the evidence in
support of the injunction fell short of establishing any pa-
ticivation by Fraser in the proceedings of Coombe' and
King, and that there was nothing to show he had any
knowledge of the transaction they were engaged in. All
that could be said against him was that he bad been
imprudent in allowing the transaction to be tattled
en ,between them iu hi. cellar ; but this was met
in a great measure by evidence showing that it was
according to the custom of the trade to allow busi-
ness to he sue conducted. Tiie result was, that their lord-
ships di..olved the injunction, and directed that the costs of
the motion at the Rolls should ha paid by the plaintiffs.

Cuo.sit INVISTMYNT COMPANY.

In this ease, the facto of which were reported in the Daily
News of yesterday, the arguments were concluded.
The Lord Chaueeller delivered judgment, end stated that
he could not concur in the decision of the Vice-Chancellor,
whose decree, he was of opinion, was erroneous. The
object of the bill was to bird the Revenionery
Company to concur in the sale of the estates in
question, end also to tit them with a concurrence in the
parrnent in the first instance of the ezpeeses of the
sale. Ile thought that the company were not bound to
complete the sale on soy term short of receiving payment
of their incumbranee as their share of the purchase money;
and that the esidenee did not bear out the conclusion that
they bad assented to a concurrence in the sale on any ether
'crudities', though they we.c reedy to give every facility if
those conditions were carried oat; end as the estates had
Sot realised a sufficient sum to pay their ineumbranee of
the expenses wen the first churge, they ought not to be
compelled to assent to such an appropriation of the pur.
chase money.
The appesl was therefore allowed, end the decree of the
court below reversed, but without costs.