The Express.
London, England, 1865-01-28 00:00:00

P
4

LAW qrELLIGRNCR.

COURT OF QUIIiti'S.BILNOH.—JAN. 27.
sittings in oboe,—(lleheil bled Chief Jostles Cleekbers,
sod Julian Otemplme, Maher', sod Mellor.) I
THI MITIOIII 01 RIOS; £0 Or VIM= V. TIC Quiff.
The further bearing the ►
erguoseete la this calm wee
resumed this morning. The thee tame before the court at
demurrer by the mown to the suppliant's deetsratiou
of an tufriaganwina of the muggiest's Waist Is the Goo-
Amami of the Enterprise by-sL. Lords Commissioners of
the Admindly. The crown °Lime the right by the premed
providing, of using Is tie various &pinwale' all
peteuted inventions, exempt when the ierentor Is called in,
and then the potties of waramemition is to be speed upon
between the investor yid the moms of the governmeat.
The Altoona 4.lloweeeir:il, the SolkitorZeomal, Phinn,
Q.C.. Mr.
_sod Mr. Went appeared on the
pert of the &WS . BowW, Q. 0., end tie. J. Browne,
the
supphait.
appeared
forovill slid in renolaskin to-day that the true coo-
druetioe of the Detest woe that it greeted a sole right to
the suppliant, wbloh had beet landed and taken by the
mieteters of the mown, and that his ready was by petition
of right.
The Attansey-Otheral sad with regard to the
question of remedy, be pros to argue on the fallacy
which had pervaded the latter portion of the learned mon-
gers argument, vu., that there wee no differeoce between
the right of panic:ming the motto and the patties of right
against the nova as an appropriate remedy for an eastuned
wrong.
The learned Attorney.Cenend bad not concluded when
the court rose, end the further ailments were adjourned
till Monday nest.

COURT OP 00/OION PLEAS-JAN. 27.

Barbara ia laiiim—Mobres Lord OW Jos** Li; aid
Jsatioss William; Wino; sad Loarims.)

B*lll O. MACE. —v.:mimeoma' iLIDO-13.

The plaintiff in this ORM wee a pawnbroker, and the de-
hodsct ens a bailiff employed In levy a distress against the
plaintiff fee rest due by Wm The ditfeadaot seised some
pledgee which had bees deposited with the plaintiff, and the
russet action was to recover damages upon the ground that
the pledgee were not liable to be seised ander the distress.
The trial took pleat before Berm Pigott, at Liverpool. when
the verdict was for the plaintiff —damages M. Saber
gamily • mile was granted to ester • poem* epos the
ground that the pledgee caul be legally seised ; and le the
alternative the rule asked that the damages should be
reduced. Upon this last plat ft was said that the *M-
id mull not recover the value of the Utilise naiad, bet
only the nine of his interest in them ; and, further, that
the plaintiff's interest was different as to ;bow things which
had been pledged more this a year to what it was is rote-
senor to those that had ham only for a shorter tiro. in
In-day the question was whether this role should
reagn:de
Mr. Sunders and Mr. Higher appeared to show 01010
against the rule • sod Yr. Monk, Q. 0., to support it.
rho Omni the.nght that goods pledged with a pawnbroker
were sot liable to be distraisied for rent don by him. A
pawnbroker was in the poultice of • person carryiog on it
" public tilde," the pledgee befog entrusted to him in
the coma of that trade ; and be was therefore within
the role of law giving eximptio• from distress for reek
This beim; so. the defendant is %kis( the good. was a
wrong-doer ; and therefore the phintiff was entitled to re-
cover from him the fall value of the goods Mime, though
of course he would have to pay to the °wain of the goods
that portion of the mhos nibs& was dm to them.
Rale diens/god.