The Express.
London, England, 1849-01-27 00:00:00

tho answers to them, obeerviag that, if say part of
the *Whir 's awe wee rated sa any property
bid in the gates% weeks, say argument on the
other aid* is rapport of that potties must tail, es the
Ism sd the husband si awl QOM MO an exception to the
✓oma lII* sad by set of padiamit Ile Prince was a:-
eluded hem_ pray interest is the Gases% 'ripely. Ho neat
road ths allilasits Bade ley tits Peon al admirs ia support
of taw wallaik is the Wiese= Is the apart below, sad
ohs pow hesia tits sousses dishrisais, and alidarits
shads by than la smart al the maim to dismiss. They
darnel that dis ihmostisa amataind in di* dears
iatatramrdii doss Ibsy was desirous ye
_pdMisft. ea they Wins& The 14parr.1
:81:1•18 ip to me tioft_ot tiop court, when the
brass rirgreasfay ailikasasillr. Rah, Mr. Warren,
sad Mr. 8. Bssith an to Is• board is the semi aids ; and ties
ssiidtoriaaarsi,
ittliedeoriesersi, Ilsoissat Mahar', sad Mr. W. M.
Janos, smell.

loam the fleaCheandor of liagisad.
Is a flowiase's CnaireT.-8•103 or CIIAILITT ISTATTIL
• pstidsa was pressated slider Bir Summit Boodle's
•st with mimeos to.eruh shanties founded at Bsverly, is
the seamy of Leto stir. The pelltiss stated that there were
fear mall bow, farming pert etas shanty, which were is
each • aced stets that It weld prove non beneficial
that they should be sold than thstmasay siondo be borrowed
for their matt, sad that • gaMilseess who was see of the
harms of the charity had- sewed to give as each for
the louses as Si. per eases, which
would be non than the =womb' let Sw when psi into
s proper state of repair. These fasts were cosibmied by
risett.—Mr. Dickenson appeared I. support of the 'Elitism,
sod esbusitted the sciecion to the wort whether it had
to great the polities, sad whether this wild be
= iltisil
without • 194111111011 to the Modor, is consegaesse of
as very small anima of the sharity, whisfielld sot exceed
SRL per eases.—The VieeChase said ha bed no doubt
Mat the evert had power to scats such as order if a
t bees wood who was +Mimi' to aecept the
Mell—S
e order wee cessortestly wade, and wittiest a re-
loess. Is the Mader.

Beene Vtre.Cheeseller ffidstt Benet.
Howitaus e. CARL —AN 17ncta's IN ravines.
This was a bill filed by a edam against her uncle, a Roman
netball' priest. to have aimed set aside, as havinu be-n procured
to be entisted by her, by the undue exercise of the influence
whisk the dideWant, from his relationship to her, u well as
his psoleed was alleged to have bad over her. According
to the allegationsgatoa, of the lei 1, the plaintiff had, for many
years, lived with her grandmother, the defendant's mother,
at Preston, performing all the work of the house, keeping
the accounts, and receiving her grandmother's roue; in feet,
devoting her whole time to her grandmother's service. In
1842, the grandmother, then 77, execute d two deeds,
and also made her ;ill. One of the deeds was
a settlement upon the plaintiff of property of
the value of about 9001., the other a settlement
upon the defendant (who was his mother's heir-at-law) of
other property, worth about 4,00 W., and by the will the de-
fendant was ermatituted universal devisee and lestatee. In
1845 the plaintiff formed an attachment displeasing to the
grandmother, on whose account, however, it was broken off.
In November, 1816, the plaintiff and the grandmother exe-
cuted the deed now sought to be impeached, whereby the
plaintiff re.eonveyed to the grandmother the property which
the latter had settled upon the former by the previous deed.
The grandmother was they 80 and the grand-daughter 29.
The deed was prepared by a solicitor who had never before
been employed by the grandmother, and the bill stated that
the plaintiff was improperly induced to execute it by the de-
fendant telling her if she did not she would go to the devil.
The defendant by his answer positively denied this, and
stated that the grandmother had required the re-eonvoyanee
from the plaintiff, being latterly dissatisfied with her on
amount of the want of attention, respect, and affection which
she manifested. The bill also charged the defendant with
having exercised nada' Influence over his mother ; but this
ha also denied. Mr. Bacon and Mr. Frieling, for the plain-
tiff, sited " Dente. Bennett " (4 Myles and Craig, 276).
Mr. 8 wanutoa and Mr. J.V. Prior, Seethe defendant, said that
his character stood too high as a clergyman and a gentleman
fee ewe a dame es wu now brought against him to be
pemibly believed. There was nothing in the plaintiff's ease
except vague inferences, from the absence of eePenes rather
than from any tact proved. Fraud wee out of the question,
and undue influence was equally go; for it appeared that the
plaintiff fully understood -kw rigida, and acted of her
own tree will. Moreover, the case fell within the
sew of the Lord Chancellor's observations in " Olameott
v. Lang " (2 Phillips, 322) where his lordship said
" Under these cirecrestaaces, if the cam had rested there, I
should have been very much disposed to follow a rule gene-
rally sated ape, and certainly founded in junk*, that where
•to is filed, making a case of alleged fraud, and the fraud
is disproved or not established, the wet will ace anew mesh
a bill to be used for any sommihey ; beams the
door of this court being always 'WS all of feud,
it would be unjust, and much bs deposited. to afford any
onosangemeat to smiesb4hme by allowing a party to
try the experiment of sad ow that ground ; and.
if ft failed, to fall bask was ihr sea inferior kind of
relief." As to the elestemelmes et the attorney bang em-
ployed for the int din ea the immesion to quo it
:Mr:tto have boon Os habit of the old lady to frequently
er attorney; smiths' she always did so miter paying
the bill ofcosts of any emearbas she bad employ ed.—Mr. Fres
Hsi, in "Toon v. Peachoc: Atkins, 250,
" Gann ' " (Ibid. 258), " Coe e. Pratt" (1
Vevey, 400), Harvey e. Mount "(8 Beaman, 439).—Tbe
VienChaseeller, in the coarse of the argument, said the
ease of hand, in the popular sense of the word, was not made
out, sad that the question ad& spies whether the 'nega-
ting in the bill might not be Melded, it being clear that a
bill might state two cams fir relief; but that if
the ems had been pat simply on the ground of
head, I. the ordinary mew of the expression, it
wadi fail. At the semelmicm of the reply, hie
Besswer saileillits would not diem et the ems at present,
but slam* sessamseeded boa podia to ogres that a
Gwen Medd be tame waiving, ea Ile plaintiff's part, every
Implesties made is Ike bill, sod cementing oa the defen-
der re part to the pleinele hay* the proporty.—Mr. Swans-
In said that the decree eight to slate that the plaintiff had
lOoi to sake_ say ens.—The Vise-Chaseellor_ : The defsa-
int h the pleklirsimele, ad I eseessmeml ler le muscat
to sr muesli, te hie partienlerly esesidering
bh bly reepsetable awl hemsewable patios in sosisty.—
Mr. womion: His repolialsa "Wald be free from say mis-
aessenstieu—The Viee-Chsmsellor : Let it be *wand as
risairers, hat let the purity go to the plainta with the
smut. That will be most for the advantage
as well as the happiness of both parties.—The case then stood
over till Monday to give aa opportunity of communicating
with the defendant as to the suggestion made by the court.
COURT OP QIIIIINM NINCII.—THTIIDAY.
essuap b hineo.
Tuna= e Ca•wisr.—liar sa lex Kuria s LIEN
UPON TIER GOODS or • Tuixo PARTY FOR TER DIST or •
GEIST ?
This we an action in buyer which bad been brought by a
oughmaker in Long-acre against the proprietor of the
Norwood Hotel, to recover isomession of a carriage which
the latter had detained for the debt of a Miss Jordan, who
had been a R=est at his hotel. It appeared that in the year
1845 Miss Jordan, now deceased, hired a carriage of the
pla;atiff for the term of three, sax, or twelve months, as she
might require. Her arms were painted on it by the plaintiff,
and she treat to reside for a time at the defendant's
hotel to Norwood, taking with her the carriage
14I=. awl also a pair of kenos, the property of Meru
Mrs Mile Jordan had remained at tie Norwood
Hotel for *see seenthe,the deAndaut sent her away, as she
was emelie le peg bee la, bat be detained the carriage and
t alerwt of bee mermen, which we sold. The plaintiff ep-
ee the disdain t moral them to get back his
being missassmfal be summed an nation against
Caniggi
WWII Wei Will M the sitliage am Raster Term, 1848, an
vomited in a verdict Br the defendant. In the
a aseMillaretiblground tessa tic
hat anobt
ni raid fen
o lien on
the seeds sf a third party for the debt of his
Mut* QC. with whom was Mr.
l'irasar.er dewed sane whist the ink, and ocateaded
that men Whew was Mud to provide food and aunt-
medatim Air a pest, be \al • lima apes all kis or her goods
Wei* la remiss emil ebtelael with the consent a,7 the
swam. abash ehe power *IP helms to a third party.
An imitespir was Belliihr Ileshens ef the goods of his
mil *wan be big a Bea era them. He would
have • is waft Wee eirs tearfeller die its keep,
rede had epee • right te deals • maybe became
ewe was an num ineerrei die it. In cans of
amp= a party an whose lead • bum might to tug-
weal& here a Hen upon the asheel ler the done
Wheasly, QC., sod Mr. La" in support of
rale. seised *et sakemer wee set bumf Is take in
oTwitodY ts:stelA Mr. Anew Bong MI lig is a•wn
that need allseilptertehemsaleaa prommeiseisn to

▪ pa or • poem iihma he_theoghe Nall not pg. Then
wire now ides whhi Wag 11111 booth of who list in fas-
hioner had • ilia is the epee et • third paly.—Lord
Dumas : Whole h the ilignes bowies& as lealviepr
and the
rite lit l` 'W
sohndliad thateai r• Yeses
it wield be shod • =Matt ef meek*, that the
mertisibilinpil to the odd himself ; but in do
was • wag denlilld guitioa. The lama
ginned ea behalf it the Madan hid did that thdr
dime Ind moss he Woe that the eisrhge hin-
ges Pimp& to Mho Jordon Psalm her sus wire
opus it; bni wen wig and kr piths to kin were
npsa hired conimge•—Lord Dwain, in delivering
add that its lankier, was CaWhd parrally to
sand,jd=lr goods of a pint Ise =ppm whiskho
Sus it wee dos that the dishaline ed • right to
desk wig pinisilsr Oleg kr Si this 'Skit he sight
have la tweed if i he to gitiadmo la lashings bad •
posh' linesiFelhe gpis goal le was not noismary
ireas in fie pima ode, taps as there was
as sew inis is le Si didsgest ia nip* of
the ea:hp to goestles the dihedral hod • elsia igen it.
B. was lime Julified ia babies 11, sal Obi rah at
Madero be amenegeg.—Tbe rad elle horsed paps ex-
pired • dais ighisa.—liale dinhingsd.

COURT OP COMMON PLEA/.—TarrsiDAT.
litttass Dosse.
VINCI= BMW, OP &ODOR •31D,1•1.—PVILIOLTION
OP • WILL.
Tbh woman Nat est M Clenemy he the ophde• ot
seam. It appeared fist la die year 1794 the late Mr.
band made s tedium& yea !Y VW. ass ddaiag s power
at_ MpUiat et peepeety le los azered
gm* power he late the. baba. fa tbeehyear la die
11641 me et Mr bribed, made • will The now
was whither wM was asseatisa si he power
owdeured by Me asttlemsal The benset he power so
lir is hey are miderial were "by Ida is be dped and
}WOW premee et two vitamin." la the lonia
et atleibilia d die het of Mre. hoboes will the meth