The Express.
London, England, 1847-07-30 00:00:00

. •
TEWKESBURY.

Yesterday the election for this borough terminated rather
more abruptly than was expected, as, at the close of the
nomination, each party appeared confident of being at the
head of the poll. But it seems that, at a late hour on Wed-
nesday night, a meeting of Lord Lucelles' committee wee
held, when it we determined not to preened further with
the contest, and yesterday morning the other candidates pro-
ceeded to the polling-booths, when a few votes were taken,
and the m►yor declared Mr. John Martin and Mr. Hum-
phrey Brown, duly elected. The successful candidates are
both liberal, and are to be chaired on Tuesday next.

WARWICK.

Sir Charles Douglas and Mr. Collins were again retuned
for this borough by a large 'majority over Mr. Henry
Roberta. The election was devoid of any excitement.

WAKEFIELD.
The pill opened yesterday morning at eight o'clock. The
first return showed a msjonty of six for Mr. Alexander, bet
this was speedily disposed of, and Use subsequent returns up
to the close show a gradually increasing majority for Mr.
Sanders.

WESTBURY.

Yesterday the nomination for this borough took piece.
Mr. William Matravers Freed Jame§ WiLKS, ElNiti Mr.
Joshua Whittaker second the nomination. Mr. .O.
Ludlow then proposed, and Mr. Robt. Atkins seetaded,
Mr. M. Higgins. Mr. Wilson entered bate a detail
of his political views on the various seliesh now
before the public. He declared himself to be oposot to the
government system of education—to the endowment& et ens
religious sect at the expense of another—to the ipios
laws—and to ell restrictions on trade and commortto.
Mr. Higgins made no direct statement as to his polled
views, except that he vas favourable to the existing game
laws—picking a pocket and taking a bare being in his ad-
ulation equally criminal. The show of hands wu in favour
of Mr. Wilson. A poll was then demanded for Mr. Higgins.

WOODSTOCK.
The Marquis of Blandford (C) was returned for this
borough yesterday. Mr. Faulkner (described as " the
notorious radical of Oxford") wee put in nomination, and
addressed the electors for upwards of two hours. Haying
been at first objected to u not possessing a sufficient quali-
fication, be said that he wee a freeman of Oxford, a feoffee of
the richest parish in the city, a freeholder of the county, a
member of the corporation, a commissioner of streets, and a
guardian of the poor; and concluded by saying that he
would not go to the poll until the electors were protected—
and advising the people of Woodstock to petition parliament
for such a measure, or for the disfranchisement of the
borough, which wu in the pocket of the Duke of Marl-
borough.

WINCHESTER.
Yesterday the nomination took place. Mr. W. R. Little-
hales, one of the borough magistrates, proposed, end Mr.
C. Wooldridge seconded, the amisetica of Sir James But.
Mr. Chidell proposed, and Dr. Waite secoaded, Mr.
Escott. Mr. B. Carter was mewed by Dr. Crawford,
seconded by Mr. G. W. John's. Sir James East
grounded has claims on his consistent advocacy of con•
serrative principle*, on the of whisk he had
been so long one of the of Wiesherder.
Yet, while he had adhered to these prin-
ciples, he had supported gag ammo issespeetive of
the party from which they iresarlid.—Mr. Newt sought
a renewal of the trust which bed bees emahrred on him
six years ago; and his claim to it was grounded on
the fidelity with which he had executed its duties.
Mr. B. Carter came forward, in consequence of a re-
quisition havin been presented to himself, as one
of their candidates, signed by one•fourth of the else.
tore body. His principles were those of his family:
he was a friend to cavil, religious, and conaniercial liberty,
and he felt a pleasure in avowuig the same seatiments ea en-
tertained by his father, whose exertions I. the mum of
reform were known thrftsbout all Hampshire. The show
of hands was in favour of Messrs. Carter and Esoott. A poll
was demanded for Sir James East.
WOLVERHAMPTON.
The nomination for this free-trade borough took place yes-
terday. No opposition was expected ; but on the morning
fixed for the nomination • a placard was posted up,
emanating from Samuel Cook, the Dudley chartist,
intimating that he intended to offer himself as a can-
didate, for the purpose of advocating the doctrines of the
people's charter. —John Barker, Esq., nominated Mr.
and Mr. Wynn seconded the somination.—Mr.Walker
proposed Mr. Thoreeley, and Mr. theme* seconded the
motion.—Mr. Limey twho was nominated at Dudley yes-
terday, in opposition to Mr. Benbow) then proposed Mr.
Cook, in a speech of considerable length, embracing the
leading doctrines of chartiam, and Mr. Adney seconded the
nomination.—Previous to petting the question,the returning-
anion asked Mr. Cook's supporters for a guarantee for one-
third of the expenses of the hustings, &c., to which they and
Mr. Cook replied, that they would give him an answer at
the proper time, and, on their declining to give
him an answer then, he declined putting Mr.
Cook's name. Messrs. Villiers and Tbornelsy, as well
as the relieneg °Moor, ware anxious to show is.l necessary
courtesy towards Mr. Cook and his friends ; and eventually
it was agreed that Mr. Cook should, if he pleased, address
the electors, though he were not put to them es e candidate.

Then_bdit. thellehett, me ether candidate, Meson. Villiers
hffa Thermley ipso useminserly elected.
Wr. V rhea pomaded to return thanks in an able
dims. Altteiiktel6 first introduction to the aliseten,
whenheheilpielsei to support the total abolition of
the eess4aere, V showed bow he had fulfilled that pledge, by
wastiatiksi Wm that he had moved their repeat in nine
eneemelve yew • and ungratulated them upon the ultimate
metes whist hid bees obtained. Six years ago one of the
=paths ever Stemed in this country washanded
erevest the repeal of the corn-laws, and unfor-
tunately, far • time, that party deluded. large section of the
working slimes into the belief that' their repeal would be
injurious to those who got their bread by the sweat of their
brow, by propagating the fallacy that dear food and high
wages went hand in hand, and vice versa. But at length,
by the interposition of Providence, bad harvests were
experienced; food was dear, but wages were not
high, because trade was bad. And then came good
harvests; food was cheap, but wages were good
bemuse business was brisk. These facts, coupled with the
teachings of the Anti-Corn-law League, opened the eyes of
the working men ; and as soon as they began to see the
tin its right light, they hastened take the side
wit!' to
wee ("paced to monopoly, Then came the recanta-
tion 010 Janus Graham, who did the best thing that a
man weld do in his situation' for he candidly owned that he
was in the wrong. He said he had been all along mistaken
in upholding the babes mentioned fallacy, for that it was
clear that deer load did not produce high wages. Mr.
Villiers then traced the progress of e rents, beginning
with the potato disease in Ireland, the change in
the views of Sir Robin Peel (whom ha eulogised
for so hoeutly, and at so great a sacrifice, owning
that he alai had been wrong) and the rapid growth of public
opinion, until the triumph of free trade had been mewed.
It might be said that, though we had free trade in core,
times were but badly now; but le would remind them that
he bad ever stated in the House of Commons, as • reason
why the corn•laws should be at once repealed, that it would
be a long time, when the repeal had taken place, before we
should recover from the evil effi tats which their enactment
had produced. Having glanced at some of the permanent
evils which the corn.laws bad produced—such as the
establishment of manufactories on the continents of
Europe and America, and the enactment of restric-
tive laws against our commerce.—Mr. Villiers proceeded
to say, that, though the corn-laws had been repealed, there
was yet much to be done, or, rather, he preferred saying,
undone; for he had not much faith in government doings for
the people. It they undid much of what their predecessors had
done, they would be doing most good. During the last ses-
sion he had been engaged on three committees of great im-
portance, upon which evidence was elicited of such a nature
as to induce him to form strong opinions on the subjects
brought under their notice. These subjects were the game
laws, the navigation laws, and the law of settlement
all which he thought productive of great evil, and which he
would consequently abolish. There were two other import-
ant measures promoted by government, which he should be
inclined to suport, if on due inquiry he thought them calcu-
lated to benefit the community at large. These were the
education question and the health of towns bill. As he had
previously intimated, be preferred the government leaving
these things to the people themselves; but if on due inquiry
it should be found that the poor were unable to procure edu-
cation for their children, or badness of trade prevented the
carrying out of improvements necessary to secure the public
health, he might be disposed to approve of government in-
terference. In no ease would be have the question of re-.
ligion mixed up with government schemes of education ; but
, he must confess, when ho saw money leviehed upon stablis
and palaces, and he knew not what trifles besides, he did
long for the pleasure of spending a little of it in the erection
of schools. There was another government measure which
he had supported ; viz., the Irish poor law, a bill which he
I thought not only politic bat just, and one he hoped would con-
fer great benefit upon the mem of the Irish people. After al-
luding to the famine with which Ireland had been afflicted, and
the dearth which had prevailed in other parts of the empire,and
expressing his opinion tint thousands might have been saved
from starvation if free-trade principles had been adopted
some years ago, Mr. Villiers ventured to predict that brighter
times were in store, especially for this district (which
he thought would yet; flourish as it had never done
before), sod concluded his speech amid loud cheers.
Mr. THORNELET addressed the electors in a brief speech,
in the course of which he expressed his opinion that his ex-
cellent colleague had not received that amount of considera-
tion from the public at large to which his extraordinary
exertions in the cause of free-trade entitled him. It was on
this account that he was peculiarly pleased to observe that
Sir Robert Peel, in his reply to the Wolverhampton address,
had alluded to Mr. Villiers by name, u one who had had •
large share in bringing about corn law repeal.
Mr. VILLIERS was then about to move • vote of thanks
to the returning officer, when • question was put by a person
in the crowd, as to why he and hie colleague voted against
the Ten Hours Bill ? Mr. Villiers replied that he had not
been informed of the views of hie constituent, on the point,
but he had been told by working men, that, as they were
often unable to work as long as they wished, through bad•
nem of trade, they thought it very hard to be prevented
making up for lost time when business was brisk. This
answer seemed to give great satisfaction to the working men
in the crowd, u did a elmilar one from Mr. Thomely ; and
on Mr. Limey stepping forward, and saying that the answer
was not satisfactory to him, he was ensiled with a storm of
bidet, from the operatives. Mr. Linney then asked Mr.
Villiers whether he would vacate his seat for Wolverhamp-
ton if he were elected for South Lancashire ?—Mr. Villiers
replied that, if it were left to himself, he should certainly
stick to him old friends. He came there to be re-electM,
and it was him wish and intention to remain their
representative. If they were of opinion -in the event
of his being elected for South Lancashire—that he
could best serve the people by sitting for South Lanca-
shire he was in their hands ,• for himself he had no private.
ends to serve, but if left with him he should sit for Wolver-
hampton.—A vote of thanks to the returning offioer was
then posed, and the proceedings terminated.

WORCESTER.
The nomination of candidates to represent this city took
place yesterday at the Guildhall, before E. Webb, Esq.,
sheriff. The proceedings were conducted generally in
good order. Mr. Lilly proposed and Mr. Alderman
1111 seconded the nomination of Mr. Hardy. Mr.
W. Stallard then rose to put in nomination Mr.
Raiford, who] was. seconded by H. D. Carden, Esq.—
Dr. Hutines rose to nominate Osman Ricardo, Esq., and
Alderman Evans to second that gentleman.—No other can-
didate appearing, Mr. Hardy addreseed the meeting,
amidst some amusement caused by the hon. gentle-
man's singular mode of delivering himself, and the ex-
treme opinions which be entertained. The subject of
education had been brought forward. Now he was always
favourable to en education of the people, but he did not like
government inspectors and officers to come forward to
educate a man's wife and children (bear, and laughter); and ,
he considered that moan might be done with 501. by the
voluntary system than a government could do with 1001.1
—Mr. Ruffard ad.ocatedgestoetion to British industry from
foreign competition. They bed amiss a hoe trade in corn,
but they ought, to eider W maw ik servimable, to have a
tree Made in other articles of emsnisplioa. He was a sup-
pones of their ancient sonstitution of church and mete,
aim which this country bad arrived at that point of perfec.
lima tism which no ether could boast of, —Mr. Irdo
eddrammil the eisallines bin
to be an aden-
oids of thses_pdaelpies whisk were held by the present go-
wasumsat. He wee Mae and faithful friend to the eats
WNW shank ; but, et dm same time, an unflinching ad-
vert* be civil mad relishes liberty ; and would have ell
rel4ims disehalsks romemaL He was an advocate for free
trade as hie fame lid bean before him ; and also forre-
sides of tattetion, refiewfas Wes aessaries at lib from exces-
sive faseelea, and *dm As as area the luxuries. An
ardent adesoate for the es melon of todasedsm am ous the
peep* be did ttotelaskier disetgamiloy peiriple an efficient
use ; and was of opinion OM seam senaMey mwelations were
wasseary. mad would wined yeepeellisa for their Sta.
blishneeeM Attar sumo otaaelleas had bra put to ase or two
of lb momilialek lbs thaw of heads ems token and wen
desired to be in boar of lb. Hardy and Mr. Ricardo. A
poi we Ikon
ode •behalf of Mr. Rufford, which
was appalatied to tabs glue this day.

WYC9MBE.

Yesterday the tbramriiiiiiiitTro—lOr this borough, Mr. 0
H. Deshwood and Mr. M. T. Smith, were re-elected.

YARMOUTH.
After a mies* tramendone fight between the different par-
ties, in will& ems party and dm another had the majority,
the poll timidly closed, the consertatives being ahead. Lord
A. nez and Mr. Coops will therefore be returned. The
town is in • state of considerable eicatement. A boy had
been deemed up with a bon upon his back es a Jew pedlar,
Mr. Ooldsmid, one of the liberal candidates, being a Jew.
Mr. Rumbold, who has represented the town for 30 yarn, is
therefore aim beaten.

MEMBERS RETURNED
TO SERVE IN THE NEW PARLIMUNI

ASHBURTON, JULY 28.—(1 room. ; 282 voters.)
Mathison (L.) (No oppositiom).
Irt Matthew_
: Matheson (L.), 141; Palmer (C.), N.
ASHTON- UNDEELLYNE,J tit 29.—(1 mans.; 724 voting.)
Hindle/ (L.) (No opposition).
Election 1641: Madlvy (L), 303; Harrop (C.), 334.
CALNE, JOLT 29.—(1 mem. ; 173 voters.)
Earl of Shelburne (L.) (No opposition).
Election : Earl of Qtiborns (L.) No opposition.
CHATHAM, JULY 29.—(1 mem. ; 919 voters)
Right Hon. 0. S. Byng (L.) (No opposition).
Election 1941: Brno (L) ,• 434 ; Lord (C.)), 134.
CHESTER, JULY 249.—(2 mama.; 2,246 voters.)
Earl Oroevenor (L.) ; Sir J. Jervis (L) (No opposition).
Lost election. lents (L), Earl Grorsetor (L). No opposition.
CHIPPENHAM, JULY 28.—(2 meals.; 278 voters.)
Neold (C.) ; Boldsro (C.) (No opitioa).
Mimeos 1841: Nada (C.), 163; Capt. Boldero (C.), 128; Lisle,
KNCESTRR, JULY 28.—(2 ; 498 voters.) LE96. I
Villiers (C.); Cripps (C.i (No opposition).
List elsolko: Virs. VDUs., (C. I; Cripps (C.). No opposition.
CLITREROE, JULY 29.—( nuns.; 412 oaten.)
Wilma (L.). (No opposition.)
Mignon 1841. Cardwell (C.), 171; Wilson (L.), 170.
DORCHESTER, JOLT 28.—(2 stems. ; 398 voten.)
Col. D. Dome (C.); Stun (C.) (No opposition).
Hestia' lea : Hon. A. IL Milky Cover (C.); Mr J. R. Graham
(C.) No opposition.
DUDLEY, JULY 28.—(1 teem.; 918 niters.)
Bonbon (C.). (No opposition.)
Lett "Amnon: Bmians (C), 348 ; Rawson (L.), 173.
DEVIZES, JULY 28.—(2 memo.; 386 voters.)
Hangars (C.) ; Brava (C.) (No iponliolo
Iri eitetion : Bruges (C.) 102; Ton (L.), 67.
DARTMOUTH, JULY 28.-6 mem. ; voten.)
Moffatt (L). (No opposition.)
election ; Molt (L), 111; Prism IrL

EXETER, JULY 28.-(2 menu.; 2,749 Yours.)
Divett (L) ; Sir T. B. Duckworth (C.) (No opposition j..
Lost election : Sir T. IL Doniworth (C.), 1,238; Gee Briggs U.), sae
FINSBURY, JULY 28.-(2 sumo.; 14,038 voters.)
Wakley (L.); Dastrombe (L.) (No opposition).
nettles 1811: Waldu (L.); Duncombe (L.). No opposition.
GLOUCESTER CITY, JULY 28.-(2 mesa.; 1,627 voters.)
Hertel*, (L.); Hope (C.) (No oppoostion).
Election 1641: Phillpotia (L), 723 ; lion-M. F. Berkeley (L.),
712; Hope (C.).646 ; Lord Loftus (C.), 510.
GATESHEAD, JuLy 28.-(1 mem.; 622 voters.)
W. Hutt, Eaq. (L.) (No opposition.)
Election 1841 W. Hon (L). No apparition
HERTFORD, JULY 28.-(2 mews.; 625 voters.)
Cowper (L.); Vise. Mahon (C.) (Nooppositson).
Election 1641: Hon. W. F. Cowper (L.) ; Viso. Mahon (C.). No
opposition.
IiONITON, JULY 28.-(2 mew.; 419 voters.)
Locke (L.) ; Sir J. W. H2t7g
11(C.) (No oPPO4lit4OO.)
Election 1641: Cot. H. D. Bailie (C. ; •Geseby (C.). No opposition.
KIDDERMINSTER, JuLY • .--(1 mem.; 522 voters.)
Godson (C.) (No opposition).
Election 1811: Godson (C.), 212; Blown) (L.), 200.
LICHFIELD. JuLY 29.-(2 memo.; 724 voters.)
Lied A. Paget (L.); Sir G. Anson (L) (No opposition.)
last molest: Barg. Aron (2.), 231; lord A. H. Peet (L.), 299;
Captain DFott (C.),
JIOLT 28.-(2 memo. • 533 voters.)
Baritly (L.) : Arkwright (C.) (No opposition.)
Lan election A:nested (C.) ; Darkly (I.) No opposition.
MAIDSTONE, JULY 29.-(2 moms.; 1,5.56 voters.)
Hope (C.); Dodd (C.) (No oppositioo).
Election 1841: Hope (C), 765 •, Dodd (C.), 723; Salomon (L.), 424.
MALMESBURY, Ism( 29.-(1 mem.; 332 voters.)
Hon. J. K. Howard (L). (No opposition.)
Electioo 1641: Hoe. J. E. Howard (L), 125; Burton (C.), 105.
MALTON, JULY 28.-(2 memo. ; 557 voters.)
Denison (L.); Childers (L.) (No opposition).
Election 1841 Childers (1.), vat.; Denison (L.).; linoant
MANCHESTER. JULY 29.-(2 memo. ; 10,423 voters.)
Bright (L.); Gibson (L.) (No opposition).
Election 1641: Philip (L.), 3,095; Right Ins. T. M. Gibson (L).
3,575; tkr G. Murray (C.), 3,113; frbstwiele (C.), 2,192.
MARLBOROUGH, JULY 28.-(2 memo.; 256 voters.)
Lord Bruce (C.); Hon. H. B. Baring (C.)
(No opposition.)
Election 1811: lord E. A. C. B. Brute (C.); Right Hon. H. B.
Barns (C.).
OXFORD CITY, JULY memo.; 2,751 voters.)
Langston (L.); Wood (L.) (No opposition).
eons Erection, 18
041. 0 : Langston (L), 1,359 ; Maclean (C.), 1,218; Mai-
(C.), 1,
PORTSMOUTH, JULY 28.-(2 memo. ; 1,974 voters.)
Right lion. F. Baring (L.); Sir G. Staunton (L.)
(No opposition).
Election 1811: Slr 0. Staunton (L.); Slight lion. F. Bung (L.).
No contest.
REIGATE, JULY 28.-(1 mew.; 194 voters.)
Cocks (C.) (No opposition).
Election 1641 Enamor (C.), 106; Dr. Dodfonl (L .), 9.
RETFORD, EAST, JULY 28.-(2 memo.; 2,596 voters.)
Hon. A. Buncombe (C.); Lord Galway (C.)
Election 1811 Hon. A. (No opposition.)
Dunsombe (C.); Vernon (C.). No motet.
RICHMOND, JULY 29.-(2 mums. 262 voters.)
Rich (L.) ; Wyvill. jun. (L.) (No opposition).
Lest denim Hon. ]. C. Dundee 11.4 ; Wok (1-) So =auto=
RIPON, JULY 28.-(2 mews ; 341 voters.)
Hon. E. Lueelles (C.); SirJ. Graham (C.)
(No opposition).
I Let election Right 11011. Sir 0. Cnkburn (C.); Hon. E. Lexclles
(C.) No contest.
SCARBOROUGH, JULY 28.-(2 memo.; 537 voters.)
Sir J. V. B. Johnstone (C.): Earl ?Sulgrave (L.)
(No opposition.)
Election 1841: Sir 1. V. B. Johnstone (C.), 293; Sir E. W. Trench
C.), 283; Rm. Phipp. (L.), 232.
SHOREHAM, NEW, JULY 28.-(2 memo.; 1,896 voters.)
Sir C. M. Burrell (C.); Goring (C..) (No opposition).
TAM WORTH, JULY 28.-(2 memo. . • 452 voters.)
Sir It. Peel (C.) ,• W. Y. Peel (C.) (No opposition).
Election 1811: Sir R. Pen (C.), 363; Capt. Edw. H. l'Cout (C.'.
241; Capt. Towashend (l.), 147.
TEWKESBURY, JULY 29.-(2 memo.; 471 voters.)
Martin (L.));. Brown (L.) (No opposition).
Election 1641: Dowdeswell (C.), 195; Martin (L.), 189; Easthope,
(L.), 171.
TIIETFORD, JULY 28.-(2 memo.; 192 voters.)
Hon. W. B. Baring (C.) ; Earl of Easton.
(No opposition.)
Election 1641 1t... W. B. Baring (C.), 86; Sir J. Plower (C.), 71;
Earl of anon, (I.), 70.
TYNEMOIITII, JULY 28..-(1 mem. ; 702 voters.)
Grey (L.). (No opposition.)
Election 1841: Monk (is ), 695; Chapman (C.), 232.
WARWICK, JULY 29.-(2 memo.; 911 voters.)
Sir C. Douglas (C.); Collins (L.) (No opposition).
Election 1841: Deane (L.); Sir C. Eurwioke Douglas (C.). (No
contest.)
‘VENLOCK, JULY 28.-(2 memo.; 935 voter..)
Forester (C.) ; Gaskell (C.) (No opposition.)
Last Election Hon. O. C. W. Fenner (C.) ; Genoa (C.). Nocontest
WHITEHAVEN, JULY 28.-(1 member; 634 voters.)
Hilelyard (C.) (No opposition.)
laudation Attwood (C.) No contest.
WIGAN, JULY 28.-(2 seems. ; 517 voters.)
Theeknesse(L.); Lindsay (C.) (No opposition).
Lan eratest: Greens!! (C.). 273; Standish (L), 270; Crosse (L),
268: °rend' (14.),268.
WINDSOR, JULY 28.-(2 memo.; 680 voters.)
Col. Reid (C.); Lord J. Hay (L.) (No opposition).
Last contest: Bannon= (L.), 316; Neville (C.), 211; Ferguson
(L.), 165; De Besucoir (L), 130.
WOLVERHAMPTON, JULY 29.-(2 mem.; 2,467 voters.)
lion. C. P. Villiers (L.) ; Thornely ( L.) (No opposition).
lon election: Hon. C. P. Villiers (I.); morosely (L.). Nooonteet.
WOODSTOCK, JULY 29.-(1 mem.; 392 voters.)
Marquis Blandford (C.) (No opposition).
Last election: Lord A. Churchill (C.). No contest.
WYCOMBE, JULY 29.-(2 memo.; 338 voters.)
Duhwood (L.); Smith (L.) (No opposition).
Election 1541: Danwood (L.), 199; Carbone (L), 132; Preshliold
c?.(3./ilt3; JAlea uir "der
28. (C(' 86.
•No-mue.t . , 3,329 voters.)
Yorke (L.); Smyth (C.) (No opposition).
last election: Lowther (C.). 1,623; Enke (L.), 1,352; Atcherley
(C.), 1,426.

POLLS.

d.BINGDON,JrLy29.—(I member; 315 voters on register.)
Poll at ( General Caulfield (L) 156
close. 1 Sir F. Thesiger (C.)
At the last election, 1643, the numbers were—Thesiger (C ), 156;
Csultlekl (L),IW.
ANDOVER, JULY 29.—(2 memo. ; 240 voters.)
Poll at CCUlbeitttC(e) )
close. Fellow's (L.)
Smith (L.)
61
*Section 1841: Etwall (L), 131; Psgett (L), 112; Volley (C.), 108.
AYLESI UltY, JULY 29.—(2 memo. ; 1601 voters.)
Pell at Dering (C.) 655
N ent (1.
el /ate. Lad 1 ---- Clayton cC u
.): liu • 699
544
Medan 1641: Clayton (C); ton (C.). 994 opposition.
BARNSTAPLE, Jutv 29.—(2 mar. ; 71111 estms.)
Poll at Bremridge (C.)
Fortescus ) BBS
close. i H0d.,,, (CC
)
252
Daum tett : H you 4,-361 ; Gore (C.), 150; Florlessmi (L.),
347; Chichester (L), 338.
BATH, Jul.'. 26). (2 memo. • 2976 voten.)
Poll at Lord Ashley (C.) 1287
Lord Demean (L.) 1268
Roebuck (L.) ll2O
Election 1611: Duncan (L.), 1114; Seebeck (L.), 1141; Bruges
(C.), 933 ; Poweneourt (C.), 1423.
BRWICK, JuLT 29.—(1;mem. ; 769 voters.)
Forster
Poll at tßenton
close. Miller
Elecd°9 1,41 i 0.107 (L). 392; Hodgson (C.), 340; weeding (C.)
334.
BODMIN, JULY 29.—(2 mean. ; 405 voters.)
Poll at Wild (C.)
12 o'clock. ltarL(L.)
Sir T. Spry (C.)
Lest election : Sir T. Spry (C), 165; Sante (L), 161.
BOLTON, JULY 29.—(2 menu ; 1,246 voters.)
Poll at Bolling (C.)
dose. Dr. Bovrring (L.)
/ Brooks (L)
Mbelles 1841: Ainsworth (L.), 670; Dr. Bowring (L), 614; R0th.536 • Rolling (C.), 441.
ifiUNORTH, JULY
29.—re(2 seems.; 833 voters.) 11
12
6 Whitmo )
Poll at 1 '
Sir R. Pino(Ct (C.)
do"' Sir J. Easthopa (L.) 368
',Section 1811: Whitmore (C1,:93; 84r R. Pigot (C.), 476; Howard
ch).oeArirrl:!•liK^4.—(2 memo.; 910 voten.)
( Hamby (C.)
Poll at ) Pilkington (L.)
Gloss.
L.) k
/ Hargreav(es (L.)
Ro
Mention 1841: read= (berC.), ta
441; Hornby (C.), 427 ; Misr (Ue
496.
BRIDGWATER, JULY 29.—(2 mass. ; 551 voters.)
Poll at Tyste (L.)
Broadwood (C.)
close' / G.l„, (L..) l9l
Ebeetion 1211: Brosdwood (C.), 260 ; Forman (C.), 276; Drew (I.),
233; Robinson (L), 249.
.'. CAM. UNIVERSITY, JULY 29. —(2 mcmm ; 2,780 'eters.)
, . _._,

lAir (C.) . .
583
Poll at Lord k ediluag (C.) 466
8 p.m. Goulburn (C.) 343
Lefevre (L.) Se
Election Mil : Rt. lion. H. Gonlburn (C.); Ilso. C. IL Low (C.)
No contest.
COVlCtirroltilYm, Jui.E.Lir 29ice.—i(L2.7ems. ; 3,724 voters.)
2563
Turn.r (C.) 1532
close' William. (L
Election 1611: 'W. 4 (L.), 1,074; Right Ron. Edw. Moe (L..,
1,430; Weir (C.), 1,243.
EVESHAM, JILT 29.—(2 memo 420 votes.)
Poll at Lord M. Mill (1.)
elem. Sir H. Willoughby (C.) 173
Sir R. Howe (L.)
129
Hendon 1641: Y. Rill (L), 188; Borthiriek (C.), 161; Bask-
out (C.), 13%
GUILDFORD, JcLY 29.—(2 memo. ; 476 voters.)
Poll at Currie (C))
Mangles (L.)
claw- 1 Thurlow (C.)
Eleotion 1841: Mangles (L.), 243; Wall (L), 219; 6carlett (C.)
177; Carrie (C.), 131.
HALIFAX, JULY 29.—(2 menu. ; 1,014 voters.)
Csirapt.C:ENvtairds(L()C.)
Pollcicea at
jtinsiel
((t..)) 509
508
$4B
276
' 304HAE1te'86710N:014575u1,..../tP7Lirh.'Hß29:co.cu—c:(42;3e,ml(.9l.4)ems.::;.l"; 8481".votarsidr .C.) wood
:0738(I-2.5:
343
Lest •tee. tical7t*bil3rinis7c..l)C, 213 i Moon (L.), 114.

4

HORSHAM, JULY 29.—(1 mem. ; 339 rotors.)
Poll tit ( Janis (L.) — 164
dam.
.. 1 Fitzgerald (C.)
Lasteketita : Horst (L). No oraosaido.-
LANCASTER, JULY 20.-42 memo.; 1,349 otters.)
Pollst 2 Gm. (C')
o'clock. /"
Graven (L.) ..i.,. 648
8.1 C.) •• 509
Itleaks li141: Oriseee(r)77,4 ; Marton (C.), 610; OIL Wan
(L), 677. 9..
LEEDS, JULY 29.—(2 memo. ; 6,2e8 Totals.) • .
Poll at =it
is (C.) 2626
(I.) 2lBl
dose. / Storrs (L.) l9BO
Election 1941: Beckett (C.). 2,075•
,_ Aldass (L.), 2,043 ; Hume
(L.), 2,023; Viscount Jocelyn (C.), 1,494.
LEICESTER, JILT 29.—(2 sWille. i. 3.608 voters.)
Sir J. Walnsesley (L.) 1647
Poll at Gardener (L.) 1602
- close. Parker (C.) 1403
Last election : Flt,. (L.), Sir J. East:hope (L.) No oppoution.
LEWES, JULY 29.—(2 memo.; 863 voters.)
Hon. H. Fitzroy (C.)
Poll at Perfect (L.)
1 459
403
21VIdom.
LoHumdscsaLet(tCul
Led coated: Elphinstons (L), 404; Hon. 11. Fitzroy (C), 494;
Harked (L.), 403 ; Viaeount Cantilope (C.), 383.
LINCOLN, JULY 29.-12 memo.-. 1,146 voters.)
529
Col. Sibthorp (C.)
446
Poll at half-put Se 1,-y (L.)
233218
2 o'clock,
cSioariEett. L(e.l3). Lytton (L.)
Election 1011 : Col. &Whom C (, HI ; Collett (C.), 491 ; Sir E. I.
Solver (L), 413; Seeley (1..), 340.
LIVERPOOL, JULY 29 —(2 memo. ; 15,659 voters.)
( Cardwell (C.)
528()
Poll at 1 Sir T. Birch (L.)
dose. i S.r D. Mackworth (C.)
222
.54
Lord J. 3lanners (C.)
Last contest • rreount /tendon (C.), 5,979 ; Cremona (C.), (vac.),
5,792 ; Sir J. Walnnaley (L.), 4,847 ; Viscount Palmerston (L.). 4,431.
LONDON, JULY 29.—(4 menu. ; 19,064 voters.)
Lord J. Russell (L.)
Pattison L
Rotbochil( .)d
(L.)
Sir O. Lupin* (L)
Mosterman (C.) 6073
Devon (C.) 7107
6996
6745
6688 '
6139
Johnson (C.) 5088
(.FY4404444 (C.) 4718
Election 1811: Muternian (C.), 6,339; Sir H. Wood, 6,315 CLyall
(C.), 6,290; Lord J. Russell (I.), 6,221; Atticood, 6,212; Patinion (L).
6,070; Crawford (L.), 6,065; Aid. Sir J. Pirle (1..), 6,017.—1 n 1843,
new writ: Pattless (L), 6,332; Bating (C.), 6,367.
NEWCASTLE-ON-TYNE. JULY 29.—(2 memo. ; 5,041
voters.)
Ord (L.) 2194
Poll at Headlsso (L.) 2168
close. / Hodgson (C.) 1660
Election 1511: Ond (L.); liinde (C.). No mutest.
NEWCASTLE•UNDRR-LYNE, JULY 29.—(2 moms.;
1,0.54 voters.)
' Christy (C.)
Jackson (L) 6.57
Lord Brsckly (C.)
Om* (L )
noun (C.), 479 ; Harris (L),430.
7, JULY 29.—(2 memo.; 1,974 voters.)
; Currie (4.)
Poll at Smith (L.)
dote. Humphrey (C.)
(mßa.yford (C.)
Dr. Epps (L)
Erotica, 1541: Rt. . R. V. Smith (1..), 831; Currie (L), 970;
Sir IL Waloaby (C.), 664; IPDoirall ',L), 170.
NORWICH, JULY 29.—(2 menu.; 4,220 rotors)
Poll at Veto (L.) 2414
dose./ Marg. of Douro (C.) 1723
Parry (L.) 1648
Election, 1841: Yarn. of Doom (C.); Smith (L.). No contest.
NOTTINGHAM, JULY 29.—(2 mem.; 5,172 voters.)
(L.)
Poll at 01V*CaloternoLL(11.. )
close. (laborite
._
1
Sir J. Hobhouse 1340183°
1089
___

Poll at
dose.

Poll at
2 o'clock.

Last contest Coto,
NORTILAMPTO:

(L.). 874
List contest: 'Glenne (1..). 1.819; Wow (1,4„ 1,728
OXFORD UNIVERSITY, .7175. k 19.—(2 maim.; 2,768
voters.)
Poll at Sir R. Inglis (C.)
Gladstone (C.) 366
7 P'l°' Round (C.)
Election, 1841: Fatrourt (C.) ;SrR. H. la" bd. (C ) No
St ALBAN'S, Jun' 29.—(2 mama.; 641 voters.)
Raphael (L.)
Pell at f Repton (C.) 252
close. a Wilkes (C.)
Hon. F. Craven (L.), lO3
1841: Repko (C.), 288; Liatowell (L.), 250 ; Woe-
twatela (L), 150.
I, JVLY 29.—(2 memo. ; 4,199 voters.)
Poll at
Parker (L.) 1124
SIGN. Ward (L.) 1108
Clark (L) 328
Drake 1341: Pa er (I.). 1,819; Ward (L.), 1,140; Urquhart
(C.), (113; Sbappard (C.), 457.
STOKE-UPON-TRENT, Irvy 29. —(2 memo.; 1,600
voters.)
Copeland
Ricardo 493
Reality

Poll at
close.

. .
WAKEFIELD, JULY 29.—(1 mem. ; 728 votary.)
Poll at Lltandara (C.) 192
close. Alexander (L.)
213etlon 1641: H. W. & lamella. (C.), 300; Hadaworth (L), 294.
WALSALL, Juix 29.—(1 mem. • 675 voters.)
Hoo. E. R. Latleton (L.) 289
close'
Poll at 1 Forster (L.) 282
Cooks (C.) ' 124
Elect on 1841: Peon (L), 3:4; GLadnone (C.), 311.

WARRINGTON, JOLT 29.—(1 mem. ; 648 voters.)
Poll at eireenall, (C.)
close. Allcard (L) 298
Eleeton 1 1 : Blaekbume (C.) (leo matest.)
WESTMINSTER, JULY 29.—(2 memo. ; 14,234 voters.)
Evans (L.) 3339
Poll at LuMington (L.) 3117
close. Cochrane (C.) 3087
Mandeville' Lord (C.) 2087
suction 1041 : Rom (C.), 3,338; Leader .), 3,281 ; ETC= (L),
?AV). In 1844 : Evame (L.), 3,841; Roos (C. MOIL
YARMOUTH, JULY 29.—(2 memo.• NO enter.)
Lord A. Lennox (C..)
Coops (C.)
Rumbold (1
Goldsmid (L.
709

Poll at
clot.

Tketion 1841: Wlisbere (1.). lionlookl 043 ; Baring
(C.), 301 ; Scams (C.), 414. Ne meted.

FORTHCOMING ELECI'IONS.
Rinnu..—Tbe election is axed by the mayor for Friday
(this day); Mr. Glyn will be returned without opposition.
Lreutruce (Counts ).—Mr. Monsell has at length published
his address, and will appear at tic hustings. His principles
are liberal, but not to the extent of repeal. Mr. Monsell is
a mast respectable gentleman, both in character and position.
The repeal club have come to the determination of giving
its support, undivided, to Messrs. W. S. O'Brien and Powell.
There is a screw loose, however, se Mr. S. O'Brien
refuses to co-operate with Mr. Powell.
MAYO.—The Repeal Club of Mayo assembled on I.ifonday
is Castlebar, to select two candidates for eupport at the en.
suing election. They had five repealer from among whnn
to make choice—Mr. R. D. Sesame, Mr. J. IC bi'Donnell,
Mr. V. O'C. Blake, Mr. George Ouseley Higgins, and Mr.
John Denis Browne. The latter gentleman is • near cousin
to Lord Sligo, and formerly represented the county as a con-
servative. He was defented twice also. The Club was
unanimous in respect to Mr. Dillon Browne, and I have good
reason to know that Mr. V. O'C. Blake will be the next
choice if he consents to co-operate with Mr. Dillon Browne.
There is sore to be a contest in this county.
I,IOIITHAXIeTONSIIIILI (SOUTH ).—Lord Henley has issued
an address to the electors. He professes to be a free-trader
and a liberal conservative, and is supported by several of the
most influential conservative of the county.
OB.INIY.—The friends of Mr. Dundee, the former mem-
ber, and those of Mr. Anderson, express equal confidence.
In the Orkney Island., Mr. Boucles has a decided majority.
In the Shetland group Mr. Anderson expects a majority,
on the strength of the dissatisfaction at exactions
made by the Dundas family, under obsolete legal
claims, which Mr. Dundas, as a dutiful scion of
his house, will not attempt to remove. In respect of
political opinions, there is little difference between the can-
didates. la respect of influence, that of the Dundee family
is doubtless great, hut so is that of an extensive London ship-
owner in such fishing communities. Our correspondent,
after due deliberation, emits the opinion thathe would think
Mr. Dundee certain to be returned, were it not that his
agents (especially in Scotland) appeared too confident of his
security.
&Atm.—The hen Mr. Venker, son of Lord Gort, has
addressed the electors.. a conservative ; u yet Mr. Somers
is the only repealer in the field.
Waterwonetstvra.— The Hon. Col. Lowther and Ald.
Thompson will be again returned without opposition. An
opponent to Ald. Tbampeen was spoken of, but is understood
to be abandoned.

IA