The Express.
London, England, 1849-02-06 00:00:00

lab 3 InteUtgence.

NOTICES.
Sao Ciaccrr.-11r. Bann Parke end Mr. teethe wild., the
Sipe evooketed ke this elioth. hare lied the lbliewho days far
UV?at the brume at do moraria )dies GEO
anew, Meat • ; lliilvp lo* 10 ; lawn,
Mink if ; La/la, Werth //4.
AI:BYTOM fir TO One.. eacurr. —Am ellatellas his been
orb M. teaks Othoemeedi Mr. Mrs rum am the lilt pro-
d the Eve aol lemilltiee far WOE the eimaime vrtef
riles Belli droll. Po rq lad elooet meorein to time
tomoilithle, Ream the Emit lovolume lowa r his
Imo moolmiled theism Be Es Echo mole amlmemerel
0111/11my kr the earsog ; II Nom OM M. Poo Rell. co
ths lot Mali= at liessam thie Overall. met viethilvem-
Oise Oahe route by the the al Om Br
the ethimitivetlem villa the leenoljeeme Eft
met oft • diorthe to the bee the ommE vow* art be
wadi maw oil hold as rein la Est lois athim. mem pow
toot wee boltt. The Indies tato+ et laritog oath beworsir
woes to the Lome Odes invositka (ietwithetiollog latoom
000 at 0,8101. wee met to nosh bre prim.) ma et • meethe
• semito lOW the aeon yes marled. Mr. these Plattloa,lo
eseardemee with whet be limm threed. retied to vo
thsieby min so oilman at die dew" am Lard 4themeika
earaksig lathe Othello at the leeemsentsby Mewls, the ems.
lothoe Ablemeo, limbed
zrzratients
olliamierdEey We steed : Mimi= (theleal
Feb. ; Were, Mardi 1 ; Wererthr, dE,
sudirS. Mara .6 ; Ithrewelvery, lite ; lierehrd, ad;
nth; Messeelo emd OE, lea Mara.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BIINCIL—TIBTWIDAT.
xw Pawn.-Debra Lord Deana& and aCcemaaJary.
Lawns/ma a.
Mr. Sexism, like• and Mr. Parnell were counsel for the
plaintiff, and Mr. Chambers, QC., appeared for he de-
fendant.
This ;wee an action brought to recover compenottion in
damages for assault and fete Imprisonment Frew the
statement of the learned counsel sad the evidence rubor
germely addsoad, it appeared that the plaintiff was a smith,
who carried au his busker in Hart-str.et, Covent-sedan,
and he was in the habit of having tnnsactione with the flosa
of Messrs. Field, konewagen, of Holborn, of which Arm de-
hedeat was • member. The occurrene;whick gave rill le
the present ac dos was this ; the plantar and a bektoiraisatalle was
la his employment, had semi= to go to the
maim he the et baying, and a workman of the
nem et William a servant of the defendant's,
hawks that the yleintiff stolen a bar of iron out of the
dap, he acennwrialed that belief to a fellow-workman who
El the plaintiff sad Idahey, sad arrived at plaintiffs
joie after he and the boy had returned home.
Sea all retuned to defendant's premises when
after soaks soave:union, the plaintiff was given into woody
and brought before the saa at Bow-street, where he
was &aimed early the nest earesing, usitherthe defendant
nor his him. The defendant
pleaded "Not s
Os ,"ida
2:l:talostification, and setup
sea &Um that the ilms Raids had on a former owe"
4,34 fecovered the deftwebat dealing a new hammer which
he had seeretell audit, his Wee.
Several witnesses were sailed on behalf of the plaintiff,
anwegat whom was hie hey likam, who had also been aim
lap sated), spoil this chew; and he stated that neither
ha ow bin miter had Whin the rod of boo, and that the
dehadente had bean unable to find it when they made the
charge. Is watradistisa to this 'antimony William Rennie
was sailed, and he skied that the plaintiff had endetvoured
to sisal a hammer hem delhadant'a premises, who cm that
NlMeisn warned his to be more honest la Attar* • and that
on
ffie sessionia ousting be saw from a lisp door, whew
Y was concealed, the plaintiff Wks the red of kos.
Mr. &Tisane Skee limbo. replied, Iced Daman summed
up. The jury retired, sad after a short 'bones witurned into
court, with a verdict for the plaintiff--damages 501.
Jaa.k.-{sittkes in Basco b .iozed Chid Jostles Dram sad
Jambes and Wighlaria).
(We are reqsastilfriaiy solistters to insert the
following in referees@ to a report etas ez paste application
reported by us some time slaw.]
Haas= e. WILION.—RAILWAT Sturman
Mr. W. IL Watson QC., appeared to show came against
a rule
to by Mr. M. D. Bill, QC , in Michaelmas
Term lask to est aide the award of Mr. filbert Garbutt,
whisk hal been wade is Mr. Bassell'a favour. The rule
had been drains& ea several ground*, and string mope:-
lions bad been cart on Mr. Remelt as well as
the arbitrator, which Mr. Watson was
to answer, when he was stopped by Mr. Hill, Pwhodlij
he had had an opportrunty of seeing his friend's
affidavits, and would at owe admit they formed
a complete mews: to the case, except as to the first branch
of the SW oblestion, which was, that the arbitrator, in
awarding the Mess of wreak matrons is the Wield
swaticeed, had wended the of the deed of whale-
ion. To Me ebbestima the remarks yew anew
otiosely etedeed. and Mr. Wo.. weeteded to show that
We IWO& el the deleomisatiss of du cookeets was a sub-
stantive assMq boo beim the arbitrator by both par-
ties, sad that on Wide, at the extensive powers of
the sabaheiss, and on the authority of the case
of "Greet v. Waring" (1 W. Bk. 476), he con-
timid the whitest°, had a right to award their
deftwaination.—Mr. Wilke followed on the same aide,
and Kroll. D. Bill and Mr. Atherton were in rey,
when Lord Deanna said, I have not been able toheard entertaplin
the ken doubt on this subjoin. I think this was within the
ealiwimion, and I think it is clearly proved to have been
Moe the arbitrator a matter in diatoms by the affidavits,
WM* we are bound to believe. There is nothing inconsis-
bet or aboard on the face of it. The other judges having
owwwwd, Mr. Watson said, I treat your lor‘kips will die
show the wile with eons. There are long affidavits in
eagis tor the sharps of misoondast ? Lord Daman: Tea.—
Zak dieffierged with coons

COURT OF COMMON PLIAB.—YIIIIIIIDAV.
MN Pam—Behr, Mee /aim Web ea • weal jury.
KIM AND ANOTHER O. Wieser: AND *soma—
Der•Lc•nox ST • Coma:Nos or Taxes.
11r. Berj. Bylm ead Mr. ilimea oppeared for the *With ;
lfr, lied. Massa sad Mr. Needham kr the dithrethrite.
This wee at L=ry
who to seas damages hrees of pa-
es seise
brought by are seemtheles
per tax for the et at St. Mestbeeds•theNtethe. epos
a book dated Oct. 6, 1846, and gives by dm disltheiste as
Modes of ese James Lek hewn oelierar of
and Lam Mx is St. Mamie's. The oredities of lelead
wee that if the said James Lee, his mat:atoms admieleirmere
skald dells:all was sow amend and seemly! for
the year the 6th Cl Apra, 1847, cw whisk nay be
aumeng ass by the R
aid lease Lee is lie mil ward
sad porta ef 8L Itartia-bs-thrifeldk es lea wthesier as
then tie bad to be veld. 'TIN* delhadiste had
gam' by default. It was sow proved the plain-
WS wire esmaissiesses Cl stamps ad Wass, sod -Lee's
hrtas soilesier Oder the Looms to (6 ft 6 Vic,
ewa 111414 Weasheirs. A sem of 462/. L. 13.1.,
dm MY a ries ham tea esdieg Mialtas)am. 1846, was
meal by Mr. Hang Oemehe to 1111•11 bees paid by him to
laseasbeeth of Oeteliek 1846. Other mu for in.
esthe peoperty tas wen alas rid Lee by dil-
igent plasm la raped Cl the same period in the
maths Cl gifember October .1 the mai year.
ham Leo died os the 146 of Ostelisa 1846, but without
Meths modem paymeet over kw the haltrojeormigellurj
Illehaelmea 1 to the of the
The perdue who 846
asses*
'paid Lee am smiled to agile by I[r
Ram his seesemor, bet refused I.lstaresserd time. upon
emassielseths el the sitmesse Met is aseming
the fez the used emu we fest to a soda of theme,
eel this for the appals to be beard is tame Ober,
were sot assay ithed mill ber,
dilliam the as wen b fle
elt, Axed sadNovem to
wommei wore this math est and Mimed to
the :WI inter et is the Ise. At the iessiesion
ef the m Mr. =lBl3= ashlar ot
the tea miss of epee the
pethirehr Isegeoge tithe bad mad the 1'7761 sad= el the
Immewthe emithoileg thee alike perm& proud
MOO Maked tierehre the walks were not
Vats slier the Tim eallsolem led se andierity to
waft asapesll 41M delivery to Mae .t &pima war-
mete, while it wee pawed did mg take plus mil eller the
tog beadeg of the appeals is the swath of Iliweember.
Isola" the *AIM were sot iLemiled, imemsitee the
=ale bed made then pegvesslkee isleileed, am
is petht of this, were Missal to the sew
ismagsle. Opostimsegimiles eflie biped OM
lirselariss mere Mater anew. lies WM* kw
it was vitiastely agreed to lehe a is
fie the

tilaintitfa for 81,31. the dainegis in the deelsrat on, subject
to a special case for the opinion of the wort above, the yet-
diet to be Mooed to any amount.

EICHICHIER CHAMBER.—Yearnanay.
Estes the Jadgr 01 the Qamees Mask sad Marano of Exchequer
M ernes from the Courted Comma Phen
Gras 0. 'LIMIT AND Anorinae—Twa FAILLE 07 Sr.
WALIIIIOOI.—It wil ha lesellested that at the
=lf the court after last Misbadmee Twm, oa the ap-
e( Mr. Serj. Talfour the kerbs al the am was
puipmed, as it was sargesesd that lbe gentian at issue be
*weft 7M parties mesa be abilineed out of eoart —lie.
Ogg NOM appeared. alai mid he was sorry to inform the
send that, contrary to angseleiliss, the parties bed been
mathasecedi to oomeng to any earibbabory arrengeseent. The cabs
was ly_again
WAIL= V. lined.t=—The court intimated that
judgmeat in this ease will be died this day.
Wan the Judges at the easseN Mesh, and Comma Pleas in
won from the Omit of Eschewer.
Benson v. Dttiecur.—lttone oe A Eluirauseas ro
!LIDOS TIC CAROO FOR ran RIPAIR or DANAO3 TO •
lhatr.—This ease, t evolving the above isapottant point,
which was fully argued after last term, mid reported in the
Daily New at the due, WM Widows for judgment at the
present sitting. The court, however, postponed giving
judgment until the decision, as the reporter understood, of a
case now ptsdiag in the House of Lords.
ARO= V. DATIL—The bets of thin ease were not bated.
Mr. Wititehurst, on behalf of the plaintiff in error, said his
learned friend on the other side had intimated that he could
not support the judgment of the court below. He, there-
fore, prayed the smart to reverse the judgment of the Court
of Subagent. The judgment was aosaiegly reversed.
ATHPITIL V. Prthoomaa.—This ONO NU postponed from
lad siVinr, in order that certain amendments might be
made in the bill of exceptioas. The parties now craved an
adjournment, as it was expected that the ease would be
arranged out of court. The application was granted.
Ds BRAITTOIS 0. OWIN.—CONITRUOTION OF STATUS'S AS
TO QUIT RINT 7011. FRALTT TO TER LORD OP • MANOR.—
Mr. Cowling argued the case on behalf of the plaintiff in
error, which involves the construction of the 3 & 4 Wm. 4th,
cap. 27, use 2 The_ plaintiff is lord of the manor of the
parish of Stratford Mortimer, Berke, end the question groom
with regard to the right to charge a quit rut foe fealty, after
the lapse of a certain period. The mart postponed judg-
ment.
MOLTON Ann Wires v. Csmantrx.—Pias or LONACY in
AN ACTION TO 71.1007111 • BUN PAID FOR AN ANNUITY.
Mr. Needham appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs in error.
From hb statement of the facts of the cue, it appeared that
the plaintiff., as the administrators to one Thomas Lee,
deceased, sued the defendant, Mr. Cameos:, who was the
of *Nuance society called the National Loan
rntalior a an
sum of money paid by the said Thomas Lea in
purchase of an annuity. The jury returned a spode] verdict
to the effect that Thomas Lee, on the 29th of August, 11113,
made a proposed to the society to purchase of them an an-
nuity commencing on the 29th of August, 1844, in considera-
tion of which Lee was to pay 3501., which proposition was
acceded to ; the jury also toned that a proposal was made en
the same day for a deferred annuity, which was to accrue is
1866 ; that the several sums of 3601. and 61.65. 2d. were paid
to the society by Lee, and received by them ; that Timms
Lee died in the year 1844 ; and that on the 19th of
August, 1843, the day on which the annuity war purchased.
Thomas Lee was a lunatic, and incapable of arranging hie
own affairs, but that at that time the society bad no know
ledge of the circumstances. The Court of Exchequer having
band in favour of the defendant, the case was brought up on
writ of error. Then were two points raised : first, whether
a lunatic could make such a proposition; and then, whether
such an agreement was not void under the statute which go
vented rusnuities. _ The learned counted contended that

Onw.-I;othground;the agreement was void.
Mr. Russell Gurney, for the defendant, argued that the
plaintiffs had no right to plead a past itcapacity—that they
ware bound by the agreement, and could not recover the
amount paid by Lee.
The farther hearing of the ease was adjourned till this day.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT.-YuTIIDAY.

—.--- .
More No CNN Condsofoesr.
IN RI WILLIAM H. Hanson.—ft FRAUDULENT BIRCUTOIL
This insolvent, who described himself as a commission
Hulbert was opposed by Yr. Dolman for two persons named
Hulbert and Nelson for a breaeh of trust. It appeared that
the insolvent was appoieted executor to the will of a
Mrs. Nebon, the mother of one of the opposing creditors and
mother-in-law to Hulbert, he having married another
daughter. The testatrix left legacies of 1071. to the parties;
and as soon as the insolvent obtained 1701. by virtue of his
office be applied it to his own uses. He was about to obtain
2701. more, but an injunction was obtained from the Court
of Chancery and payment was stopped, The opposing cre-
ditors were persons in humble circumstances, and the loss
to them of the legacies was of serious consequence.—The
insolvent admitted without reserve the appropriation of the
money to his own parpoes, and on being asked what he had
to my for his ooadset, replied " Nothing." He accounted
for nearly 701._ by saying he discounted a bill far Colville
NOM Dore, caned Lord Colville, whose resifiesco he did not
now know. He had no mesas of paying the complainants,
and had been needy twelve months in prison; he was
brought up by the charitatde fund of the court.
The learned Chief Cemmiesbner declared that the insol-
vent's conduct had been etrodoin towards the legatees under
the wiil of Mrs. Nelsen. He disbelieved the statement as to
the advance to the person named Colville. Whether true or
false, the poor young we bad been defrauded, and not-
withstanding the insprisonmeat the insolvent had already
undergone, he would be rententled for some time longer.
IThe judgment of the enurt was, that the insolvent be im-
prisoned from the vesting order for a period of fifteen
calendar months for a breach of trust.