Commit
•
c1074fb
1
Parent(s):
5c0a423
upload hub_repos/n2c2_2018_track1/README.md to hub from bigbio repo
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
|
2 |
+
---
|
3 |
+
language:
|
4 |
+
- en
|
5 |
+
license: other
|
6 |
+
license_bigbio_shortname: DUA
|
7 |
+
pretty_name: n2c2 2018 Selection Criteria
|
8 |
+
---
|
9 |
+
|
10 |
+
|
11 |
+
# Dataset Card for n2c2 2018 Selection Criteria
|
12 |
+
|
13 |
+
## Dataset Description
|
14 |
+
|
15 |
+
- **Homepage:** https://portal.dbmi.hms.harvard.edu/projects/n2c2-nlp/
|
16 |
+
- **Pubmed:** False
|
17 |
+
- **Public:** False
|
18 |
+
- **Tasks:** Text Classification
|
19 |
+
|
20 |
+
|
21 |
+
Track 1 of the 2018 National NLP Clinical Challenges shared tasks focused
|
22 |
+
on identifying which patients in a corpus of longitudinal medical records
|
23 |
+
meet and do not meet identified selection criteria.
|
24 |
+
|
25 |
+
This shared task aimed to determine whether NLP systems could be trained to identify if patients met or did not meet
|
26 |
+
a set of selection criteria taken from real clinical trials. The selected criteria required measurement detection (
|
27 |
+
“Any HbA1c value between 6.5 and 9.5%”), inference (“Use of aspirin to prevent myocardial infarction”),
|
28 |
+
temporal reasoning (“Diagnosis of ketoacidosis in the past year”), and expert judgment to assess (“Major
|
29 |
+
diabetes-related complication”). For the corpus, we used the dataset of American English, longitudinal clinical
|
30 |
+
narratives from the 2014 i2b2/UTHealth shared task 4.
|
31 |
+
|
32 |
+
The final selected 13 selection criteria are as follows:
|
33 |
+
1. DRUG-ABUSE: Drug abuse, current or past
|
34 |
+
2. ALCOHOL-ABUSE: Current alcohol use over weekly recommended limits
|
35 |
+
3. ENGLISH: Patient must speak English
|
36 |
+
4. MAKES-DECISIONS: Patient must make their own medical decisions
|
37 |
+
5. ABDOMINAL: History of intra-abdominal surgery, small or large intestine
|
38 |
+
resection, or small bowel obstruction.
|
39 |
+
6. MAJOR-DIABETES: Major diabetes-related complication. For the purposes of
|
40 |
+
this annotation, we define “major complication” (as opposed to “minor complication”)
|
41 |
+
as any of the following that are a result of (or strongly correlated with) uncontrolled diabetes:
|
42 |
+
a. Amputation
|
43 |
+
b. Kidney damage
|
44 |
+
c. Skin conditions
|
45 |
+
d. Retinopathy
|
46 |
+
e. nephropathy
|
47 |
+
f. neuropathy
|
48 |
+
7. ADVANCED-CAD: Advanced cardiovascular disease (CAD).
|
49 |
+
For the purposes of this annotation, we define “advanced” as having 2 or more of the following:
|
50 |
+
a. Taking 2 or more medications to treat CAD
|
51 |
+
b. History of myocardial infarction (MI)
|
52 |
+
c. Currently experiencing angina
|
53 |
+
d. Ischemia, past or present
|
54 |
+
8. MI-6MOS: MI in the past 6 months
|
55 |
+
9. KETO-1YR: Diagnosis of ketoacidosis in the past year
|
56 |
+
10. DIETSUPP-2MOS: Taken a dietary supplement (excluding vitamin D) in the past 2 months
|
57 |
+
11. ASP-FOR-MI: Use of aspirin to prevent MI
|
58 |
+
12. HBA1C: Any hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) value between 6.5% and 9.5%
|
59 |
+
13. CREATININE: Serum creatinine > upper limit of normal
|
60 |
+
|
61 |
+
The training consists of 202 patient records with document-level annotations, 10 records
|
62 |
+
with textual spans indicating annotator’s evidence for their annotations while test set contains 86.
|
63 |
+
|
64 |
+
Note:
|
65 |
+
* The inter-annotator average agreement is 84.9%
|
66 |
+
* Whereabouts of 10 records with textual spans indicating annotator’s evidence are unknown.
|
67 |
+
However, author did a simple script based validation to check if any of the tags contained any text
|
68 |
+
in any of the training set and they do not, which confirms that atleast train and test do not
|
69 |
+
have any evidence tagged alongside corresponding tags.
|
70 |
+
|
71 |
+
|
72 |
+
|
73 |
+
## Citation Information
|
74 |
+
|
75 |
+
```
|
76 |
+
@article{DBLP:journals/jamia/StubbsFSHU19,
|
77 |
+
author = {
|
78 |
+
Amber Stubbs and
|
79 |
+
Michele Filannino and
|
80 |
+
Ergin Soysal and
|
81 |
+
Samuel Henry and
|
82 |
+
Ozlem Uzuner
|
83 |
+
},
|
84 |
+
title = {Cohort selection for clinical trials: n2c2 2018 shared task track 1},
|
85 |
+
journal = {J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.},
|
86 |
+
volume = {26},
|
87 |
+
number = {11},
|
88 |
+
pages = {1163--1171},
|
89 |
+
year = {2019},
|
90 |
+
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz163},
|
91 |
+
doi = {10.1093/jamia/ocz163},
|
92 |
+
timestamp = {Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:56:11 +0200},
|
93 |
+
biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/journals/jamia/StubbsFSHU19.bib},
|
94 |
+
bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}
|
95 |
+
}
|
96 |
+
|
97 |
+
```
|