Patent GB-840502-A (GB)
Title: Improvements in or relating to electrical signal transmission systems
Inventor: DALEN CHRISTIAAN JOHANNES VAN
IPC: H04L1/18
Filed: 1956-07-25
Abstract: 840,502. Code telegraphy. STAAT DER NEDERLANDEN TEN DEZE VERTEGENWOORDIGD DOOR DE DIRECTEUR-GENERAAL DER POSTERIJEN, TELEGRAFIE EN TELEFONIE, DE. July 25, 1956 [July 26, 1955], No. 22979/56. Class 40 (3). In a system for transmitting code signals in an arythmic manner in both directions over the channel, and in which successive signals are differently designated, a designation signal being transmitted at the beginning of each transmission of code signals and upon resumption of normal transmission after an interruption due to incorrect reception of a code signal, the receiver at each end responds to such designation to determine whether to transmit a next code signal, a return designation signal or a repetition of the code signal last transmitted. The arrangements described employ the transmission system described in Specification 840,501, in which the characters in a converted 3-element code are sent as three successive frequencies chosen from four predetermined frequencies with the condition that two successive frequencies are not the same, and a signal is deemed to have been correctly received if three frequency changes are detected within prescribed time limits by receiver discriminating apparatus. In the diagrammatic arrangement, Fig. 2, each of the connected or communicating stations M, S includes transmitting and receiving counters, the former being changed to their alternative state when a code character signal has been transmitted and correctly received. A receiving counter is switched to its opposite state when a code character or service signal has been transmitted and a code character correctly received provided that the character has not already been received with the transmitter in the condition other than its existing state. At the commencement of transmission, the service code signal I is sent from station M, and if received correctly at station S the transmitter at that station operates to send the signal I to M which transmits the letter A which, if received correctly is printed and its transmitter T2 sends the letter a, whilst its receiver counter OT2 changes to group II. At station M the letter a, if correctly received, is printed, the receiver and transmitter counters change to group II so that B is sent in group II. If this signal is mutilated S cannot send any signal, M sends service signal II which is mutilated and M again sends the signal II. If this signal is received, T2 sends service signal I and if this is correctly received, the transmitter T1 at M again sends B. If this is correctly received, the letter B is printed since the receiver R2 is in condition II. The station S again sends the letter a in group I, but as the receiver at station M is in condition II, the letter a which has been printed is not reprinted and its transmitter changes to group I. The transmitter at M now sends C which is printed at S and its transmitter sends b in group II which is printed at M. The receiver at M changes over to condition I, whilst its transmitter changes back to group II, so that letter D, if correctly received at S, is printed. The slave transmitter T2 now sends c which is distorted so that M sends the service signal II. Transmitter T2 at S again sends signal I which is distorted and M again sends service signal II which is received, and T2 sends signal I which is again distorted at M and its transmitter sends II which is distorted. M repeats signal II which is correctly received and T2 sends back service signal I which is distorted. T1 again sends II which is received and the return service signal I being correctly received at M, this station sends D in group II but as counter OT2 of receiver R2 is in condition I, this letter is not printed and the counter OT2 is not changed over. Letter c is transmitted in group I and as the receiver R1 is in the " I " condition, the letter c is printed. The transmitter and receiver counters at M change over and E transmitted in group I is printed at station S at which the transmitter and receiver counters change over to condition II. The letter d is transmitted and printed at M, and F transmitted in group II is correctly received at S and printed. The letter e is now transmitted from S in group I and as the receiver at M is in condition I, is printed at that station. Transmitter and receiver cotmters ZT1, OT1 are again changed over, and the letter e transmitted in group I. This letter, if received correctly at S, is printed as its receiver R2 is in group I condition, and the counters OT2, ZT2 at this station are both changed over to the condition II. In an alternative arrangement, Fig. 3 (not shown), in which the slave station S is modified to send both types of service signals I, II the system is such that a code letter signal is not repeated if it has already been correctly printed and the return signal from that station is distorted so that it is not apparent at the transmitting station whether the character has been distorted or correctly received. In a further arrangement, Fig. 4 (not shown), the station M has solely a transmitting counter, and the slave station solely a receiving counter, and the system operates so that the character is printed and the receiving counter is stepped to its alternative state provided a code letter signal is correctly received after a service signal which is in agreement with the state of the counter, i.e. if the counter is in position I, and a service signal I preceded a code character signal correctly received, the counter steps to its alternative position. The transmitter counter is stepped to its alternative position when the undistorted reception of a code character follows the transmission of a code character. In a modified system, Fig. 5 (not shown), separate service signals are not employed, and the signals transmitted from the master station have a fourth or added element transmitted as frequency f1 or f2 for group I and by f3 or f4 for group II, where f1 . . .f4 are the four predetermined frequencies, the choice between f1, f2 and f3, f4 for groups I, II respectively being made to preserve, in the 4-unit signal, the condition that successive elements must be of different frequencies, so that undistorted reception of a signal can be tested by detecting the number of frequency changes in a predetermined time. As in the Fig. 4 arrangement, the main and slave stations have solely a transmitting and receiving counter respectively, the former being stepped when a character transmitted and received without distortion at the distant station, i.e. not eliciting a repeat transmission, is followed by correct reception of a character. Further, as in Fig. 4, a received character is printed and the counter stepped to its alternative condition if the group of the received signal agrees with that of the existing condition of the counter. In a further modification, Fig. 6 (not shown), in which an increased signal propagation time is allowed by arranging for the storage of two characters at the master and slave transmitters, the signals have additional elements to define three groups and when a transmitted signal has been distorted, at the distant station, the receiver at the transmitting station is blocked for two signal periods, or longer if the distortion persists, whilst its transmitter repeats signals until signals transmitted from the distant station are correctly received. Circuit arrangement of system, Fig. 7. The system shown is designed to operate according to the diagrammatic arrangement shown in Fig. 2. The 5-unit signals in a perforated tape are passed by a transmitter St under control of a pulse generator P3 to a circuit WGS1 and thence to five triggers A, B, C, E, F whilst a sixth trigger D receives a pulse opposite to that fed into the trigger B. For twenty-four of the thirty-two 5-unit signals the appropriate 6- unit code is obtained by inserting between the 3rd and 4th units of the 5-unit code an element opposite in sense to the 2nd unit of the 5-unit code, whilst the remaining eight " exception " 5-unit signals require further modification of their code elements. The outputs of A, B, C, E, F are fed to a converter CC1 comprising rectifier networks which detect the eight " exception " signals, and over a circuit WGS2 reverse the element from trigger D for four of the signals, and the elements from triggers C and D for the four remaining exception signals, as described in more detail in Specification 840,501. Idle time signals for periods when a station is receiving but without signal traffic transmission are produced by control of circuit WGS1 from a device It. The transmitting counter ZT comprises a twocondition trigger and according to its state applies high and low voltages or vice versa on its output leads connected to rectifier network circuits WGS3 . . . WGS5 made operative in succession by a distributer V1. Normally the signal element pairs MM, MS, SM, SS from AB, CD, EF which are applied to WGS3... WGS5 control circuits G, H producing one of four control voltages to operate transmitter I to generate the appropriate frequency f1 . . . f4. If, at the receiver, a signal is distorted or missing, a circuit B1 of the receiver at the station produces a pulse which passes to circuit H1 at the associated or station transmitter producing pulses which through P1, P2, P3 disable the circuits WGS1, WGS2 and prevents the transmitter from sending a fresh character and prevent P1 producing a pulse to step the counter ZT. The condition of ZT results in the application of the appropriate voltages to WGS3 . . . WGS5 to represent either a service signal I or a service signal II, the circuit H1 determining whether the service signal is transmitted. The signals received at O are applied through filters F1. . . F4 to associated triggers A, B, C, D and through circuit WGS6 to circuits WGS7 . . . WGS9 made operative in turn by pulses from elements K, L, M of a three-stage counter