| { | |
| "questions": [ | |
| { | |
| "question": "Does the generated architectural style accurately reflect the basic elements of architecture described in the text?", | |
| "0_point_standard": "The architectural style does not match the text description and fails to accurately depict the basic elements of architecture.", | |
| "1_point_standard": "The architectural style fully embodies the basic elements of architecture described in the text." | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "question": "Is the outdoor photography effect consistently applied throughout the entire image, creating a realistic and coherent representation?", | |
| "0_point_standard": "The outdoor photography effect is inconsistent or unrealistic, leading to a disjointed architectural representation.", | |
| "1_point_standard": "The outdoor photography effect is consistently applied, making the architectural representation realistic and coherent." | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "question": "Does the model accurately follow the specific architectural style or materials mentioned in the text (e.g., Gothic, glass curtain walls, brickwork)?", | |
| "0_point_standard": "The model fails to accurately represent the specific architectural style or materials mentioned in the text.", | |
| "1_point_standard": "The model accurately showcases the specific architectural style or materials described in the text." | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "question": "Are structural details such as windows, doors, and facade elements rendered accurately and clearly, consistent with the described architectural style?", | |
| "0_point_standard": "The structural details are inaccurate or unclear, failing to reflect the specified architectural style.", | |
| "1_point_standard": "The structural details are rendered accurately and clearly, closely matching the architectural style described in the text." | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "question": "Does the overall composition and logical consistency of the image meet professional architectural photography standards?", | |
| "0_point_standard": "The image lacks logical consistency or is poorly composed, not meeting professional architectural photography standards.", | |
| "1_point_standard": "The image is logically consistent and well-composed, meeting professional architectural photography standards." | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "question": "Does the image exhibit captivating aesthetic appeal and visual impact, in line with professional architectural visualization standards?", | |
| "0_point_standard": "The image lacks aesthetic appeal and does not provide significant visual impact, falling short of professional visualization standards.", | |
| "1_point_standard": "The image has strong aesthetic appeal and visual impact, meeting professional architectural visualization standards." | |
| } | |
| ] | |
| } |