Datasets:
Tasks:
Text Classification
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
parquet
Languages:
English
Size:
10K - 100K
License:
Create README.md
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
---
|
2 |
+
task_categories:
|
3 |
+
- text-classification
|
4 |
+
language:
|
5 |
+
- en
|
6 |
+
size_categories:
|
7 |
+
- 10K<n<100K
|
8 |
+
---
|
9 |
+
# Dataset Card for Dataset Name
|
10 |
+
|
11 |
+
## Dataset Description
|
12 |
+
|
13 |
+
- **Homepage:**
|
14 |
+
- **Repository:**
|
15 |
+
- **Paper:**
|
16 |
+
- **Leaderboard:**
|
17 |
+
- **Point of Contact:**
|
18 |
+
|
19 |
+
### Dataset Summary
|
20 |
+
|
21 |
+
This dataset is comprised of `emoji` and `emotion` subsets of [tweet_eval](https://huggingface.co/datasets/tweet_eval). The motivation
|
22 |
+
is that the original `emoji` subset essentially contains only positive/neutral emojis, while `emotion` subset contains a varied array
|
23 |
+
of emotions. So, the idea was to replace emotion labels with corresponding emojis (sad, angry) in the `emotion` subset and mix it together
|
24 |
+
with the `emoji` subset.
|
25 |
+
|
26 |
+
### Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
|
27 |
+
|
28 |
+
Similar to tweet eval the expected usage is text classification.
|
29 |
+
|
30 |
+
### Languages
|
31 |
+
|
32 |
+
Only English is present in the dataset.
|
33 |
+
|
34 |
+
## Dataset Structure
|
35 |
+
|
36 |
+
### Data Instances
|
37 |
+
|
38 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|
39 |
+
|
40 |
+
### Data Fields
|
41 |
+
|
42 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|
43 |
+
|
44 |
+
### Data Splits
|
45 |
+
|
46 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|
47 |
+
|
48 |
+
## Dataset Creation
|
49 |
+
|
50 |
+
### Curation Rationale
|
51 |
+
|
52 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|
53 |
+
|
54 |
+
### Source Data
|
55 |
+
|
56 |
+
#### Initial Data Collection and Normalization
|
57 |
+
|
58 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|
59 |
+
|
60 |
+
#### Who are the source language producers?
|
61 |
+
|
62 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|
63 |
+
|
64 |
+
### Annotations
|
65 |
+
|
66 |
+
Refer to [tweet_eval](https://huggingface.co/datasets/tweet_eval). No additional data was added.
|
67 |
+
|
68 |
+
#### Annotation process
|
69 |
+
|
70 |
+
Same as tweet eval.
|
71 |
+
|
72 |
+
#### Who are the annotators?
|
73 |
+
|
74 |
+
Same as tweet eval.
|
75 |
+
|
76 |
+
### Personal and Sensitive Information
|
77 |
+
|
78 |
+
Same as tweet eval.
|
79 |
+
|
80 |
+
## Considerations for Using the Data
|
81 |
+
|
82 |
+
### Social Impact of Dataset
|
83 |
+
|
84 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|
85 |
+
|
86 |
+
### Discussion of Biases
|
87 |
+
|
88 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|
89 |
+
|
90 |
+
### Other Known Limitations
|
91 |
+
|
92 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|
93 |
+
|
94 |
+
## Additional Information
|
95 |
+
|
96 |
+
### Dataset Curators
|
97 |
+
|
98 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|
99 |
+
|
100 |
+
### Licensing Information
|
101 |
+
|
102 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|
103 |
+
|
104 |
+
### Citation Information
|
105 |
+
|
106 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|
107 |
+
|
108 |
+
### Contributions
|
109 |
+
|
110 |
+
[More Information Needed]
|