answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
382
]
} | 10.1039/C3EE44174A | The enhanced stabilities for polymer-based hybrid solar cells were remarkable when considering the much thinner overlayer for polymers, indicating that the hydrophobic nature of HTMs seemed to be strongly related to the stability of the perovskite-based hybrid solar cells.In summary, we successfully fabricated efficient solid-state organic–inorganic hybrid solar cells based on a CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite and a PDPPDBTE hole transport polymer. | What is perovskite? | 15446 |
{
"text": [
"671 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
104
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2013.03.002 | As listed in , an excellent η= 5.83% was achieved in presence of 36 wt% PEGDME (Jsc= 12.1 mA cm−2, Voc= 671 mV, ff= 0.718). | What is the value of Voc? | 45068 |
{
"text": [
"15–30"
],
"answer_start": [
136
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.026 | BaTiO3 particles (300–800 nm) enabled effective photon capture by significant increase in light scattering, whereas TiO2 nanoparticles (15–30 nm) facilitated electron injection. | What is TiO2? | 35118 |
{
"text": [
"13.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
45
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.026 | These values correspond to PCEs of 16.2% and 13.9%, respectively, which are consistent with their averaged performance measurement from forward and reverse scans.To better understand the origin of the device performance differences, we firstly compared the conductivity of CBD6 and sprayed NiO films (). | What is the value of PCE? | 9289 |
{
"text": [
"0.96 V"
],
"answer_start": [
157
]
} | 10.1039/C8CS00656C | As a result of optimisation, the fully printable blade-coated perovskite solar cells exhibited an efficiency of 10.44% with a Jsc of 16.73 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.96 V, and an FF of 65%. | What is the value of Voc? | 16603 |
{
"text": [
"10.27%"
],
"answer_start": [
261
]
} | 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.12.012 | Comparing with the one-step counterpart, a dramatic enhancement in fill factor (FF) by nearly 50% was observed while the open-circuit voltage (Voc) and short-circuit current density (Jsc) only changed slightly, accordingly the PCEs was improved by 56.86% (from 10.27% to 16.11%). | What is the value of PCEs? | 9798 |
{
"text": [
"18"
],
"answer_start": [
10
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2014.04.071 | A film of 18nm TiO2 particles (PST-18R, JGC C & C, Japan) of up to 9μm thick was first printed on a F-doped SnO2 (FTO) conducting glass electrode and coated with a second layer (up to 5μm thick) comprised of 400nm light-scattering anatase particles (PST-400C, JGC C & C, Japan). | What is TiO2? | 45223 |
{
"text": [
"19.17%"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.014 | The PLMF-3 device shows the best performance with an optimal PCE of 19.17%, a Jsc of 22.17mAcm−2, a Voc of 1.08V, and FF of 79.79%. | What is the value of PCE? | 2244 |
{
"text": [
"688 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
118
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2011.12.005 | The performance of XS25 in DSSCs shows a shortcircuit current (Jsc) of 8.94 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 688 mV, and an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 3.99%. | What is the value of Voc? | 34895 |
{
"text": [
"0.961 V"
],
"answer_start": [
148
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.07.022 | The MAI(PbI2)1−X(CuBr2)X inverted planar perovskite solar cells (x=0.025, 0.050, 0.075, and 0.100) showed the highest efficiency where x=0.050 (VOC=0.961 V, JSC=21.51 mA/cm2, FF=82.60%, and η=17.09%). | What is the value of VOC? | 10163 |
{
"text": [
"SD2"
],
"answer_start": [
112
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.014 | More interestingly, the conversion efficiencies of these quasi-solid-state DSSCs based on a triphenylamine dye (SD2) and a ruthenium dye (N719) could reach rather high values of 7.40% and 7.55%, respectively, which are up to 94% of those with liquid electrolytes. | What is electrolyte? | 38290 |
{
"text": [
"8.74%"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.022 | The optimal η values for the photovoltaics with PtNi0.41, PtNi1.07, and PtNi2.41 CEs are 8.74%, 8.43%, and 8.17%, yielding cell enhancements of 37.6%, 32.8%, and 28.7% in comparison with 6.35% for Pt based device, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 31371 |
{
"text": [
"0.117%"
],
"answer_start": [
36
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00060J | This leads to an increase in η from 0.117% to 0.154 and 0.146% for the two DSCs after 34 days, and this efficiency is essentially retained over the following 24 days. | What is the value of η? | 61013 |
{
"text": [
"1.04 V"
],
"answer_start": [
161
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | The device based on the FTO/bl-TiO2/MAPbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/Ag structure yielded the maximum PCE of 16.2% under standard AM 1.5 condition (Jsc = 21.1 mA cm−2, Voc = 1.04 V, and FF = 0.74).In 2013, Kelly and coworkers reported the use of a thin ZnO nanoparticle film (∼25 nm) as an electron-transport layer in an ITO/bl-ZnO/MAPbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/Ag structure PHJ solar cell. | What is the value of Voc? | 13245 |
{
"text": [
"120 s"
],
"answer_start": [
153
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA08262E | After cooling to room temperature, 200 μL CH3NH3I solution (35 mg mL−1 in IPA) was dropped on the surface of PbI2 with various loading times from 0 s to 120 s, followed by spin-coating at 4000 rpm for 40 s. | What is the value of time? | 23146 |
{
"text": [
"72.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
97
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA09362H | Surprisingly, for the SCOS device, the Jsc, Voc and FF are found to be 23.65 mA cm−2, 1.05 V and 72.4%, respectively. | What is the value of FF? | 22808 |
{
"text": [
"17.15%"
],
"answer_start": [
195
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.105384 | After the exposure in air for 200h, the PCE of MAPbI3: α-bis-PCBM-based PSC persists 87.12% of the initial value (from 18.48% to 16.1%), while the PCEs of other devices decreased to 70.55% (from 17.15% to 12.10%) and 43.10% (from 16.24% to 7%) of their initial PCEs. | What is the value of PCE? | 451 |
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.02.003 | In contrast, the slot-die-coated film with blowing shows a typical color and absorption spectrum of a methyl ammonium lead iodide (CH3NH3PbI3, MALI)-based perovskite film. | What is perovskite? | 5887 |
{
"text": [
"3.96mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
41
]
} | 10.1016/j.apt.2018.03.008 | The Cell-S obtained PCE of 2.36%, Jsc of 3.96mAcm−2, Voc of 0.816V and FF of 72.85%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 36036 |
{
"text": [
"1.04 V"
],
"answer_start": [
92
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA00769A | The pristine perovskite device obtained a PCE of 15.61% with a Jsc of 21.23 mA cm−2, Voc of 1.04 V, and FF of 0.71. | What is the value of Voc? | 21857 |
{
"text": [
"12.86%"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.037 | The resulting PCE increased from 10.77% without DIO to 12.86% with 1% DIO, which was a 19.4% increase, thus verifying that adding 1% DIO to the perovskite layer facilitated increasing the device performance of the PSC. | What is the value of PCE? | 8614 |
{
"text": [
"0.92V"
],
"answer_start": [
107
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.077 | As the result, the PCE of the solar cells have been increased from ∼9.36% to ∼12.79% (Jsc=21.56mAcm−2, Voc=0.92V, FF=64). | What is the value of Voc? | 6040 |
{
"text": [
"silver"
],
"answer_start": [
9
]
} | 10.1039/C6EE01079B | Finally, silver electrodes were thermally evaporated to evaluate the performance of the device. | What is electrodes? | 20351 |
{
"text": [
"793 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1016/j.saa.2017.01.048 | The superior performance of D6 is characterized mostly due to its high VOC (793 mV) and JSC (8.6 mA cm− 2). | What is the value of VOC? | 45858 |
{
"text": [
"18.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
71
]
} | 10.1039/C7TC04649A | Nonetheless, the PCE values of the respective devices were enhanced to 18.5% and 17.2% when a TiO2/ionic liquid double ETL was utilized. | What is the value of PCE? | 16857 |
{
"text": [
"8.03%"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.04.027 | This is an improved photovoltaic performance compared to that of the devices employing FeSe2 NRs CE (η=8.03%, JSC=15.79 mA cm−2, FF=0.68) and Pt CE (η=8.20%, JSC=15.87, FF=0.69). | What is the value of η? | 36122 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
176
]
} | 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.08.016 | shows the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of TiO2 thin film and it confirms the formation of homogeneous morphology with uniformly dispersed nanometer sized grains on FTO substrate. | What is substrate? | 56152 |
{
"text": [
"3.43%"
],
"answer_start": [
125
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM33679K | For example, the RGO CE based DSSC shows the lowest Jsc (9.47 mA cm−2) and FF (0.54) values, and thus the resulting η value (3.43%) is the worst among the four different cells, as expected. | What is the value of η? | 75184 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
36
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.124 | All the as-prepared hybrid films on FTO substrates and ZnO aggregates were characterized with XRD. | What is substrate? | 45032 |
{
"text": [
"4.18%"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2012.09.018 | The DSSCs sensitized by each of dyes TPTDYE-3, TPTDYE-4 and TPTDYE-5 were found to show maximum η values of 4.18%, 5.28% and 5.42%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 44845 |
{
"text": [
"10.72mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.09.035 | The 1PEP:CDCA-based cell exhibits the highest cell performance with a η of 5.33% (Jsc=10.72mA/cm2; Voc=0.71mV; FF=0.70).We performed quantum chemistry calculations at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level to gain insight into the electronic structures of these dyes. | What is the value of Jsc? | 45798 |
{
"text": [
"4.37%"
],
"answer_start": [
25
]
} | 10.1039/C4NR03900A | 3c, an optimal rear η of 4.37% is recorded in the cell with Ni0.85Se alloy CE, which is 0.08% and 3.56% higher than for the DSSCs from Ni and Pt electrodes, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 71413 |
{
"text": [
"6.19%"
],
"answer_start": [
35
]
} | 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.007 | An energy conversion efficiency of 6.19% was observed with > 100% enhancement over the undoped cell. | What is the value of efficiency? | 39938 |
{
"text": [
"11.12%"
],
"answer_start": [
318
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP05006A | At the optimized molar ratio of 1:1:0.1 for PbI2:CH3NH3I:HONH3Cl, the PHJ-PSCs exhibit an average power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 10.61 ± 0.51%, which is much higher than that of pristine 1:1:0 based cells without additive (7.21 ± 0.61%), and the best performing HONH3Cl-induced device can yield a PCE as high as 11.12% with a Jsc of 18.42 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.95 V and FF of 0.63. | What is the value of PCE? | 22005 |
{
"text": [
"8.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
14
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA16385K | Compared with 8.9% for the maximum PCE of the devices without NPs, the maximum PCE of the ones with NPs reaches 10.3%, which accounts for an about 15.7% enhancement measured under AM 1.5G (100 mW cm−2), as list in Table 1. | What is the value of PCE? | 18912 |
{
"text": [
"0.751 V"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
} | 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.06.059 | Compared to the u-doped TiO2 electrode-based DSSC (an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.751 V, a Jsc of 7.4 mA cm−2, a fill factor of 67.1%, and an efficiency of 3.73%), n-doped-2 TiO2 electrode-based DSSC showed an improved performance of 0.726 V, 10.52 mA cm−2, 63.6%, and 4.86%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 32970 |
{
"text": [
"0.5 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.02.006 | Photoelectrochemical experiments were carried out with 0.5 cm2 active area solar cells.The performance of natural dyes as semiconductor sensitizer was monitored through photocurrent action spectra and/or current-potential curves. | What is the value of active area? | 40330 |
{
"text": [
"0.25cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
112
]
} | 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.11.052 | The device power conversion efficiency of the perovskite solar cell was found to be 6.6% with an active area of 0.25cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 3866 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
157
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2011.06.001 | Photocurrent–voltage characteristics of the DSSCs were recorded with a potentiostat/galvanostat (CHI650B, CH Instruments, Inc., USA) at a light intensity of 100 mW/cm2 calibrated by an Oriel reference solar cell (Oriel 91150). | What is the value of light intensity of? | 51870 |
{
"text": [
"glass"
],
"answer_start": [
385
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.016 | 0.08143g solid LiI (Acros) and 0.01542g I2 (SCRC, Shanghai, China) were then added to the above polymer solution under ambient conditions, and the solution was stirred continuously until a homogeneous viscous liquid was formed.To prepare the photoanode film, TiO2 nanoparticle paste was deposited from TiO2 suspensions prepared in advance by the doctor–blade technique on a conducting glass substrate (F–doped SnO2, 15Ωsq−1, Yaohua FRP Co. | What is substrate? | 23234 |
{
"text": [
"3,34%"
],
"answer_start": [
331
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.070 | The current-voltage characteristics of DSSCs based on E1 and E2 electrolytes are described by J-V curves of cells shown in The E1-based DSSC produced a short circuit photocurrent (Jsc) of 8,0 mA cm−2, an open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) of 0,61V and a fill factor (FF) of 0,69, corresponding to a power conversion efficiency (η) of 3,34%. | What is the value of η? | 44381 |
{
"text": [
"SnO2"
],
"answer_start": [
146
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.214 | A film was prepared by an electrophoretic deposition (EPD) method, which 0.1 M Co(NO3)2 aqueous solution was used as EPD solution, fluorine doped SnO2 (FTO) glass and a SUS304 plate were used as a cathode and an anode, respectively. | What is anode? | 26485 |
{
"text": [
"0.146%"
],
"answer_start": [
56
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00060J | This leads to an increase in η from 0.117% to 0.154 and 0.146% for the two DSCs after 34 days, and this efficiency is essentially retained over the following 24 days. | What is the value of η? | 61021 |
{
"text": [
"8.74%"
],
"answer_start": [
129
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.009 | Interestingly, the PCE was high when fabricated on rigid ITO substrate in dopant-free i-PSCs (PCE ~ 15.71%) and BHJ IOSCs (PCE ~ 8.74%). | What is the value of PCE? | 7695 |
{
"text": [
"19.41%"
],
"answer_start": [
162
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA04851C | Upon both Lewis base surface passivation and doping of PC61BM with 2,6-Py, we achieved a remarkable improvement in performances with champion PCEs from 15.53% to 19.41%. | What is the value of PCE? | 12188 |
{
"text": [
"13.55%"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.071 | Also shown in , when a back-reflector is added, the PCE of the PSC illuminated from ITO side increases from 13.55% to 14.50% with the increased JSC from 18.60 to 19.18 mA/cm2 and nearly unchanged VOC and FF. | What is the value of PCE? | 5516 |
{
"text": [
"1.11 V"
],
"answer_start": [
204
]
} | 10.1016/j.isci.2019.06.004 | In contrast, the T-SnO2 device presents negligible hysteresis: under reverse scan, it has a PCE of 20.92% (Voc: 1.12 V, Jsc: 23.91 mA cm−2 and FF: 0.780); under forward scan, it has a PCE of 20.62% (Voc: 1.11 V, Jsc: 23.87 mA cm−2 and FF: 0.777). | What is the value of Voc? | 4947 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
50
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE00444F | Therefore, the combined effect of the lower lying TiO2 conduction band and shorter electron lifetime explains the general trend of lower Voc for these devices compared to DSSCs with the acetonitrile electrolyte.With 8 μm thick TiO2 films coated with a 3.5 μm thick reflecting layer, RKF containing devices showed an impressive Jsc of 17.50 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.67 V, and a FF of 67% yielding a η of 7.87% at 1 Sun. | What is ? | 60654 |
{
"text": [
"100mW·cm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
114
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.034 | I-V measurements were carried out with a solar simulator (CEP-25TF) under AM1.5G solar light with an intensity of 100mW·cm−2 calibrated by a standard silicon cell (BS-520,S/N235). | What is the value of solar? | 3020 |
{
"text": [
"8.00mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
171
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.084 | The cell with only DMPII, i.e., without any LiI shows the highest value of 0.80V; however, the cell efficiency is not the highest in this case, because of its lowest JSC (8.00mAcm−2), which was probably caused by a slow diffusion of DMPII ions in the electrolyte due to their large cation size. | What is the value of JSC? | 25693 |
{
"text": [
"0.62 V"
],
"answer_start": [
442
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.03.015 | And the introducing of the bulky alkoxy substituent could lead to a fast dye-regeneration in order to avoid the geminate charge recombination between oxidized sensitizers and photoinjected electrons in the nanocrystalline TiO2 film, thus enhancing the HKK-BTZ1 sensitized cell performance.The HKK-BTZ4 sensitized cell under standard global AM 1.5 solar condition exhibited the better photovoltaic performance with JSC of 17.9 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.62 V, and a FF of 0.66, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency η of 7.30%, while the Ru dye N719-sensitized TiO2 showed an efficiency of 7.82% with a JSC of 17.5 mA/cm−2, a VOC of 0.62 V, and a FF of 0.72.Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version, at | What is the value of VOC? | 37100 |
{
"text": [
"61.09%"
],
"answer_start": [
510
]
} | 10.1039/C8NJ00927A | From the results, it is evident that the device fabricated using co-sensitizer P1 carrying cyanoacetic acid, at the concentration of 0.2 mM NCSU-10, exhibited an enhanced photon conversion efficiency (PCE) of 9.19% with a JSC of 21.20 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.658 V and FF of 65.85%, while P3 containing barbituric acid displayed a PCE of 8.75% with a JSC of 22.23 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.671 V and FF of 58.64%, whereas NCSU-10 (0.2 mM) alone displayed a PCE of 8.28% with a JSC of 20.38 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.665 V and FF of 61.09%, but the dyes P2 carrying rhodanine-3-acetic acid and P4 containing thiobarbituric acid showed considerably lower performance. | What is the value of FF? | 61617 |
{
"text": [
"0.060cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
49
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.07.004 | The active area of the device was measured to be 0.060cm2.The current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the photovoltaic devices were measured using a computer-controlled Keithley 2400 sourcemeter. | What is the value of active area? | 8684 |
{
"text": [
"18.59%"
],
"answer_start": [
149
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.069 | Specifically, the JSC increased from 21.10 to 22.93mAcm−2, and most conspicuously the FF increased from 71.42% to 75.91%, reaching an average PCE of 18.59%. | What is the value of PCE? | 12164 |
{
"text": [
"1.01 V"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.025 | As shown in a, the cell with the Mo cathode exhibited high Jsc of 20.11 mA cm−2 and Voc of 1.01 V, which are nearly the same values as those of the Au-cathode cell. | What is the value of Voc? | 6528 |
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
93
]
} | 10.1016/j.jechem.2015.10.003 | S4, supporting information), and all the perovskite films represent pure tetragonal phase of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite, showing that the porous architecture can also facilitate the complete conversion of PbI2 to CH3NH3PbI3Photovoltaic performances of C-PSCs based on different TiO2 films were investigated and displayed in (a), the SP-Planar-P based C-PSC displays a really low performance with an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.96 V, short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 15.65 mA/cm2, fill factor (FF) of 0.37 and PCE of 5.56%. | What is perovskite? | 268 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
50
]
} | 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.02.047 | SEM photography of the TiEt400 layer deposited on FTO substrate (D) shows the morphology of the film obtained. | What is substrate? | 55075 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
247
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA06418K | With increasing Li concentration, Voc increased from 0.59 V for no LiI treatment, and eventually reached 0.65 V using the 0.5 M LiI solution with a slight increase in Jsc.It is well known that introduction of LiI into an electrolyte consisting of I−/I3− redox couples used for DSCs increases Jsc while it decreases Voc. | What is redox couples? | 73085 |
{
"text": [
"0.69 V"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.148 | The photoelectrochemical performance of the DSSCs based on these dyes showed that Voc varied from 0.38 to 0.69 V and Jsc ranged from 0.14 to 2.69 mA cm−2. | What is the value of Voc? | 57052 |
{
"text": [
"22.83mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
234
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.11.030 | The optimized doping ratio of the additive CrO3 in the PEDOT: PSS/CrO3 hybrid precursor solution is 3:1 in volume, which resulted in a champion device exhibiting 16.90% power conversion efficiency, short circuit current density (JSC) 22.83mA/cm2, open circuit voltage (VOC) 0.98V, and fill factor (FF) 0.76 under 100mW/cm2 AM 1.5 illumination (c). | What is the value of JSC? | 2644 |
{
"text": [
"57.26"
],
"answer_start": [
118
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA14976F | With further increase in the concentration of TTIP to 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mL led to the decrease in IPCE value to 61.67, 57.26 and 53.71%. | What is IPCE? | 73420 |
{
"text": [
"2.56%"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1039/C0JM04419A | In the case of the DSSC with well-aligned ZnO NRs, during 500 bending cycles, the PCE was well maintained and ranged from 3.15% to 2.56%, which illustrates that the periodically aligned vertical ZnO NR array electrode is able to release the bending strain efficiently and maintain the morphology without breakage. | What is the value of PCE? | 72537 |
{
"text": [
"7.12%"
],
"answer_start": [
164
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA04879J | The best performing DSC contains the [Cu(1)(4)]+ dye combined with a [Co(bpy)3]2+/3+ redox mediator; value of η = 3.47 and 3.69% for duplicate DSCs relative to η = 7.12% for an N719 reference DSC are the highest efficiencies achieved for a heteroleptic copper(I) sensitizer using our ‘surfaces-as-ligands’ approach. | What is the value of η? | 74425 |
{
"text": [
"5.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
17
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.01.019 | The η of L101 is 5.1% (Voc= 724 mV, Jsc= 9.24 mA cm−2, FF = 0.76, εmaxabs= 44.4 × 103M−1cm−1) which is higher than L1 (η= 4.7%, Voc= 712 mV, Jsc= 8.79 mA cm−2, FF = 0.75, εmaxabs= 23.3 × 103M−1cm−1). | What is the value of η? | 36166 |
{
"text": [
"16.18%"
],
"answer_start": [
251
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA10470C | The J–V curve of the device fabricated with 1.8 mg mL−1 Ni nanobelts exhibits the best photovoltaic performance with a Voc of 1.02 V, a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 21.64 mA cm−2, and a fill factor (FF) of 73.3%, yielding a champion PCE of 16.18% under simulated AM 1.5 100 mW cm−2 solar irradiation, as listed in Table 1. | What is the value of PCE? | 19463 |
{
"text": [
"8.25mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.12.014 | The corresponding values (VOC, JSC, FF, and η) of the Pt counter electrode-device were 0.71V, 8.25mAcm−2, 0.63, and 3.7%, respectively.The relatively low JSC, FF and η of the graphene counter electrode-based cell might be possibly due to the series resistance and catalytic activity of the CEs. | What is the value of JSC? | 43390 |
{
"text": [
"59.97%"
],
"answer_start": [
184
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA00990A | The maximum performance was obtained for a polymerization time of 10 min, which resulted in a champion device exhibiting η of over 6%, Jsc of 14.086 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.711 V, and FF of 59.97% due to the optimized PEDOT film thickness.As the constituent monomer of PEDOT, the concentration of EDOT is also one of the important impact factors for the photovoltaic performance of PEDOT films. | What is the value of FF? | 62342 |
{
"text": [
"2.5mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
100
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.222 | The DPC-based exhibited open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.63V, short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 2.5mA/cm2 and fill factor (FF) of 70%, resulting an overall power efficiency of 1.12%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 48219 |
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
62
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.005 | planar, meso, inverted, the mechanism of fatigue stability in CH3NH3PbI3 based perovskite solar cells were systematically investigated. | What is perovskite? | 4150 |
{
"text": [
"2.27%"
],
"answer_start": [
258
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2012.05.003 | The best data was obtained with 0.5 M 4-TBP, I sensitized cell gave a short circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 6.07 mA cm−2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.568 V and a fill factor (FF) of 0.66, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 2.27% at 100 mW cm−2 under simulated AM 1.5G solar light conditions. | What is the value of η? | 43895 |
{
"text": [
"8.16%"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.11.038 | FS01, FS03 and FS06 displayed lower conversion efficiencies (η) compared to N719; FS02 and FS04 displayed comparable efficiencies; while FS05 (8.16%) even outperformed N719. | What is the value of η? | 35886 |
{
"text": [
"781mV"
],
"answer_start": [
93
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152817 | As expected, the cell using Co–Ni–Se-1:1 as CE delivers a high open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 781mV, a large short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 17.28mAcm−2 and an fill factor (FF) of 0.67, thus yielding an outstanding PCE of 9.00% and outperforming that of Pt CE (7.97%). | What is the value of Voc? | 56435 |
{
"text": [
"7.20%"
],
"answer_start": [
278
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.07.013 | Photovoltaic parameters for MC219-sensitized solar cell are 9.58mAcm−2, 0.655V and 0.733 as photocurrent density (Jsc) open circuit potential (Voc) and fill factor (ff) respectively, yielding power conversion efficiency (η) of 4.6% which is 63.8% of the N719 sensitized cell (η=7.20%) under the same cell fabrication and measuring conditions. | What is the value of η? | 45825 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
152
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA14313A | After calcination at 500 °C for 1 h, the resulting film was immersed in a 40 mmol solution of N719 dye (Solaronix SA) in ethanol for 24 h to obtain the TiO2 photoanode.The DSSCs were assembled by clipping the TiO2 photoanode and counter electrode together, and injecting the electrolyte into the aperture between the two electrodes. | What is photoanode? | 64374 |
{
"text": [
"3.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | independently fabricated a conventional or inverted device based on CuSCN HTM and achieved a PCE from 3.8% to 12.4%.Inspired by the application of a NiO layer in polymer bulk-heterojunction solar cells, Guo and Sarkar et al. | What is the value of PCE? | 13399 |
{
"text": [
"17.34 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
31
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.208 | = 6.79%; GO/Co (1:10) CE: JSC= 17.34 mA/cm2, VOC= 0.76 V, FF = 0.57, and Eff. | What is the value of JSC? | 40712 |
{
"text": [
"2.89%"
],
"answer_start": [
99
]
} | 10.1039/C1CP21762C | The η achieved by the DSSC with DL film (3.36%) is 16% higher than that of the cell with TL alone (2.89%) and remarkably higher than that of the cell with SL alone (0.05%). | What is the value of η? | 62191 |
{
"text": [
"7.54%"
],
"answer_start": [
169
]
} | 10.1039/C3EE40296G | For I−/I3− redox couple, DSCs incorporated with MoP and Ni5P4 cathodes yielded a PCE of 4.92 and 5.71%, and the DSC using Ni5P4/C composite cathode showed a high PCE of 7.54%, comparable to that of the device with a Pt cathode (7.76%). | What is the value of PCE? | 73830 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW·cm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
63
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.08.028 | The photovoltaic testing was measured under an illumination of 100 mW·cm−2 (AM 1.5G), which was provided by a solar light simulator (Oriel, 91192). | What is the value of illumination? | 23493 |
{
"text": [
"4.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
} | 10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.10.012 | All in all, the efficiency (η) of individual segments varied from 1.7% to 4.1%. | What is the value of η? | 30660 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
441
]
} | 10.1039/C5CP01880C | gratefully acknowledges the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for a PhD study fellowship.† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Comparison of the performance of solar cells with and without a spray pyrolysis compact layer and the SEM picture of the compact layer, the determination of the diffusion coefficient of TEMPO by cyclic voltammetry with a microelectrode, cyclic voltammogram of TEMPO/TEMPO+ and D149/LEG4-sensitized TiO2 film, absorption spectra of D149 and LEG4 sensitized TiO2 film, the effects of lithium salt concentration on the solar cell performance and charge extraction measurements. | What is ? | 66325 |
{
"text": [
"0.71 V"
],
"answer_start": [
67
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.223 | With the increase of Ho2O3 in the doping layer, Voc swinged around 0.71 V and JSC increased first and then decreased. | What is the value of Voc? | 32155 |
{
"text": [
"0.16cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
32
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.010 | The active area of the DSSC was 0.16cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 58270 |
{
"text": [
"848mV"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.10.018 | As a result, the DSSCs sensitized by W03 employing [Co(phen)3]2+/3+ redox couples exhibit the best PCE value of 9.43%, with a Voc of 848mV, a Jsc of 16.2mAcm−2 and a FF of 0.70, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 44274 |
{
"text": [
"60"
],
"answer_start": [
314
]
} | 10.1016/j.vacuum.2011.10.026 | After being dried in the air, Pt catalyst about 3nm in thickness was spattered on the FTO glass by precision etching coating system (Model 682, Gatan).The dye adsorbed TiO2 electrode and Pt-counter electrode were assembled into a sandwich type cell and sealed with a hot-melt film (ionomer Surlyn 1702, Dupont) of 60μm in thickness as described elsewhere UV–visible absorption spectra were measured with a UV–Vis-Nir spectrophotometer (UV-3600, SHIMADZU) after the dyes were desorbed from TiO2 film by NaOH solution (0.01M). | What is TiO2? | 24422 |
{
"text": [
"3.85%"
],
"answer_start": [
43
]
} | 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.04.046 | The high energy-conversion efficiency (η), 3.85%, has been achieved for 12% Gd-doped BiFeO3, which is more than 100% higher than the undoped BiFeO3. | What is the value of η? | 29144 |
{
"text": [
"17.90 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
25
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.05.028 | This cell shows a Jsc of 17.90 mA/cm2, Voc of 707 mV and FF of 0.54.The Voc values of the DSSCs with the nanocomposite photoanodes are lower by about 50 mV with respect to the DSSC having the TiO2 photoanode. | What is the value of Jsc? | 39446 |
{
"text": [
"0.86 V"
],
"answer_start": [
118
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR03265J | When the PSS/PEDOT ratio increased from PEDOT1:PSS0.5 to PEDOT1:PSS12, the VOC of the IP-PSC increased gradually from 0.86 V (PEDOT1:PSS0.5) to 0.93 V (PEDOT1:PSS5.0) and decreased to 0.88 V for PEDOT1:PSS12.0. | What is the value of VOC? | 18814 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
48
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.09.025 | The active area of the solar cells was fixed at 0.25 cm2.Particle size distribution was determined through Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) using a Zetasizer Nano S (Malvern Instruments Ltd, UK) on TiO2 suspensions in terpineol. | What is the value of active area? | 42878 |
{
"text": [
"e"
],
"answer_start": [
1
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.061 | Results of this research are promising and can provide a new insight for further research on water-based gel electrolyte for DSSCs.Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at | What is electrolyte? | 50893 |
{
"text": [
"4.37%"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1039/C7NJ01019B | Sensitizers S3 and S4 exhibit power conversion efficiencies (η) of 1.88% and 2.11%, respectively, whereas N719 exhibits a η value of 4.37% under similar conditions.It appears that the specific molecular structures of S3 and S4, in particular, the presence of carbazole groups at larger dihedral angles, reduce the recombination rate, most likely by inhibiting the access by iodine/iodide electrolyte to the TiO2 surface. | What is the value of η? | 63743 |
{
"text": [
"17.14mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
117
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.051 | The liquid-state cell exhibited an excellent efficiency (η) of 9.12% with the short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 17.14mAcm−2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 753mV and the fill factor (FF) of 0.71. | What is the value of Jsc? | 27159 |
{
"text": [
"0.16 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
44
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.137 | The active area of the fabricated DSSCs was 0.16 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 25638 |
{
"text": [
"8.45%"
],
"answer_start": [
275
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.021 | Adjusting the nanodome size yielded a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 15.88 mA/cm2 with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 8.82%, which were both better than the reference cell without a subwavelength-structured antireflective coating (JSC= 15.26 mA/cm2 and PCE = 8.45%).Abundantly available solar energy has long been recognized as an important alternative energy source. | What is the value of PCE? | 32485 |
{
"text": [
"11.62±0.47mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.031 | Perovskite solar cells fabricated with ∼375nm thick from 9% PbI2 concentration display an average Jsc of 11.62±0.47mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.75±0.02V and a FF of 51.8±1.6%, resulting in a relative low average PCE of 4.51±0.32%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 4700 |
{
"text": [
"9.41%"
],
"answer_start": [
113
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.01.001 | As the benchmark, the Pt CE based DSCs exhibited Voc (857 mV), Jsc (15.69 mA cm−2), FF (0.70), and a high PCE of 9.41%. | What is the value of PCE? | 59418 |
{
"text": [
"0.5 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
171
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA09036B | After annealing, the precursor solution (3.0 μL) with solvent NMP, DMSO, DMF or GBL under the same conditions was dropped onto the electrode film as prepared (active area 0.5 cm2); the crystal growth then proceeded inside the chamber (DBL45, Deng Ying) for which the temperature (from 0 to 80 °C) and relative humidity (from 30% to 98%) were well controlled.The crystallographic structure of the perovskite films was obtained with X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8-Advance, Cu Kα radiation); the samples were prepared according to the same process as the solar-cell devices. | What is the value of active area? | 19833 |
{
"text": [
"11.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | The device efficiency of devices based on undoped HTMs 54–57 were reported to be reproducible, with PCE values in the range of 11.0–11.5%. | What is the value of PCE? | 13034 |
{
"text": [
"0.94 V"
],
"answer_start": [
222
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA13646A | The ssDSCs based on the classic HTM Spiro-OMeTAD, under 1 sun light illumination, gave a referenced efficiency of 5.4% with a short-circuit photocurrent density (JSC) of 8.90 mA cm−2, an open-circuit photovoltage (VOC) of 0.94 V and an FF of 0.65. | What is the value of VOC? | 63948 |
{
"text": [
"12.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
206
]
} | 10.1039/C7TC04649A | successfully fabricated PSCs based on mesoporous TiO2 nanohelices with different pitchs and radii through an oblique-angle electron beam evaporation technique where their best devices demonstrated a PCE of 12.1%. | What is the value of PCE? | 16746 |