answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"7.91%"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.046 | The cell device with PANi–8wt‰ MWCNT complex CE yield a maximum front η of 7.91% (Jsc=17.95mAcm−2, Voc of 0.675V, and FF of 0.653) under simulated air mass 1.5 (AM1.5) global sunlight in comparable to 6.49% for the cell with pure PANi electrode. | What is the value of η? | 38411 |
{
"text": [
"0.05%"
],
"answer_start": [
283
]
} | 10.1039/C1CP21762C | An η of 3.36% was achieved for the cell with a double layer (DL) film, consisting of a commercial transparent layer (TL) and the SL; this efficiency is 16% higher than that of the cell with the bare transparent layer (2.89%) and remarkably higher than that of the cell with bare SL (0.05%). | What is the value of η? | 62201 |
{
"text": [
"14.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
202
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226765 | Moreover, we could demonstrate the impressive PCE enhancements achievable by using the propose hybrid HTL (PCE up to 16.0%) in comparison with solar cells based on PEDOT:PSS, which showed a PCE of only 14.3%. | What is the value of PCE? | 982 |
{
"text": [
"0.63 V"
],
"answer_start": [
30
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.08.027 | However, the Voc of 4–7 (0.59–0.63 V) was smaller than that of 1–3 (0.61–0.70 V) (runs 3–9). | What is the value of Voc? | 54205 |
{
"text": [
"12.47mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
81
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.007 | The Voc, Jsc, FF and efficiency of solar cell based on the NT-60 film are 1.01V, 12.47mAcm−2, 0.73 and 9.19%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 11839 |
{
"text": [
"0.1 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
19
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA15210D | The active area is 0.1 cm2 defined by the shadow mask. | What is the value of active area? | 19099 |
{
"text": [
"6.46 mA"
],
"answer_start": [
31
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2013.05.007 | The Isc increases from 5.42 to 6.46 mA cm−2 and the cell efficiency increases from 5.18% to 6.27%, the improvement being about 19.3% and 21%, respectively. | What is the value of Isc? | 58001 |
{
"text": [
"1cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
332
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104099 | The atomic force microscope (AFM) images reveal a root mean square surface roughness of 12.9nm and 27.3nm for the perovskite film without and with PEABr treatment, respectively (To demonstrate the possibility for scale-up of the Sn–Pb mixed perovskite films prepared by blade coating, we fabricated solar cells with active areas of 1cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 9729 |
{
"text": [
"12.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
60
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.057 | These PCEs were higher than the PCE of devices with PC61BM (12.4%). | What is the value of PCE? | 148 |
{
"text": [
"0.09cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
122
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.012 | Finally, 120nm thickness of silver (Ag) electrode was deposited on the HTM by thermal evaporation with the active area of 0.09cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 11039 |
{
"text": [
"1.03V"
],
"answer_start": [
156
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.178 | The device employing 5mol% Zn-doped NiOX as HTL exhibited improved JSC and VOC values as compared to the un-doped NiOX devices (18.71–21.84mAcm−2 and 0.99V–1.03V for JSC and VOC, respectively). | What is the value of VOC? | 3592 |
{
"text": [
"7.33%"
],
"answer_start": [
38
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP05950C | The value of the Au–Ag@TiO2 DSSC (η = 7.33%) was 230%, 160%, and 72% higher than those of the DSSCs based on pure TiO2 (η = 2.22%), Ag/TiO2 (η = 2.81%), and Au/TiO2 (η = 4.26%), respectively. | What is the value of η? | 74405 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA04762B | To the best of our knowledge, the achieved PCE (18.87%) is the highest conversion efficiency among the devices with the structure of FTO/compact TiO2/meso-porous TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3−xClx/HTM/Au employing small-molecular HTMs. | What is ? | 22634 |
{
"text": [
"9%"
],
"answer_start": [
19
]
} | 10.1039/C5CS00113G | 0.74 V) and PCE (4.9% vs. | What is the value of PCE? | 21055 |
{
"text": [
"0.3208 V"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpcs.2010.08.020 | For the undoped ZnO nanorod-based DSSC, Jsc, Voc, FF, and η were 0.657 mA cm−2, 0.3208 V, 0.2590, and 0.05%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 55164 |
{
"text": [
"4.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
211
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP00264A | By optimising the spacer thickness (separation between the working electrode and the counter electrode) and the Co3+ species concentration, mass transport limitations were removed at 1 sun and attained a PCE of 4.8% for aqueous cobalt phenanthroline electrolyte DSCs. | What is the value of PCE? | 66868 |
{
"text": [
"11.31%"
],
"answer_start": [
147
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA01383C | We systematically studied the photovoltaic performances and the AVT values of devices with different carbon grids, and achieved the highest PCE of 11.31%. | What is the value of PCE? | 14355 |
{
"text": [
"12.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
299
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.045 | The current–voltage (J–V) characteristics measured of the six devices are presented in A and B, the corresponding photovoltaic performance parameters are summarized in Samples M3 that were pre-coated with CH3NH3I solution and dipped for 10 min exhibits the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) 12.9% with the highest open-circuit potential (Voc) and largest short-current density (Jsc), 1.01 V and 19.4 mA cm−2. | What is the value of PCE? | 10423 |
{
"text": [
"7.77%"
],
"answer_start": [
260
]
} | 10.1039/C4NJ02263G | Under the same conditions, the DSSCs for WH-C2 and YD20 with incorporation of hexyloxy or methoxy groups on the triphenylamine donor segment showed a Jsc of 13.10 and 12.54 mA cm−2, Voc of 831.10 and 817.71 mV, and FF of 0.70 and 0.68, corresponding to a η of 7.77% and 7.02%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 77333 |
{
"text": [
"0.08cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
144
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.161 | Subsequently, a commercial carbon paste (CC, Shenzhen DongDaLai Chemical Co., Ltd.) was bladed on the prepared film with a fixed active area of 0.08cm2 and dried at 100°Cfor 30min.Characterization: Current–voltage characteristic was measured by using an electrochemical workstation (Solartron SI1287/SI 1260, -0.2–1.2V bias) under simulated solar illumination (Oriel, 911A, AM 1.5G irradiation 100mWcm−2) under ambient conditions. | What is the value of active area? | 8030 |
{
"text": [
"0.1 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
} | 10.1039/C3CE41648H | The dye-sensitized TiO2 electrode (active area 0.1 cm2) and Pt-deposition counterelectrode were assembled into the sandwich-type cell. | What is the value of active area? | 74565 |
{
"text": [
"3.22%"
],
"answer_start": [
36
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.10.099 | This resulted in the low η value of 3.22% of DSSC-1, while the η value of DSSC-2 is 7.98%, though they have the same FF value of 0.68. | What is the value of η? | 58019 |
{
"text": [
"16.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.10.018 | We have achieved ∼25% improvement in power conversion efficiency (PCE) of η=16.4% for BP nanosheets+Spiro-OMeTAD as an HTM as compared to spiro-OMeTAD (η=13.1%). | What is the value of η? | 9904 |
{
"text": [
"20–25"
],
"answer_start": [
340
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.05.016 | In order to investigate the effect of polarity and length of the chains or the size of the cation on photovoltaic performance four different analogue electrolyte prepared by using K34, K35, K36 and TEGDII with same composition of reference electrolyte instead of BMII.TiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized by sol-gel method and growth to the 20–25 nm by Ostwald ripening in autoclave. | What is TiO2? | 46136 |
{
"text": [
"0.15 Sun"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1039/C3CP50998B | Furthermore, PCEs of up to 9.1% are obtained under 0.15 Sun illumination, which shows that these devices are also promising for lower light applications (e.g. | What is the value of illumination? | 76086 |
{
"text": [
"11.98 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.003 | The cell with P as HTM, shows a PCE of 6.64% with Jsc= 11.98 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.84 V and FF = 0.66, where as P3HT as HTM based cell exhibited a PCE of 4.24% with Jsc= 11.83 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.64 V and FF = 0.56. | What is the value of Jsc? | 578 |
{
"text": [
"10.82%"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA06876B | Both the photocurrent and FF improved significantly, and a promising PCE of 10.82% was obtained (JSC = 19.16 mA cm−2, VOC = 976 mV, FF = 0.576). | What is the value of PCE? | 18837 |
{
"text": [
"5.34%"
],
"answer_start": [
148
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.09.035 | Under optimal conditions, DSSC with PbS shows the power-conversion-efficiency (PCE) of 4.71%, which is slightly lower than that of Pt-based device (5.34%), fabricated under similar conditions.Gratzel cells or DSSCs are marvellous because of their easy processing, ease of fabrication, and stable as compared to other organic solar cells (perovskite solar cells) (). | What is the value of PCE? | 50148 |
{
"text": [
"0.64V"
],
"answer_start": [
95
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.129 | The qssDSSCs fabricated with the BS-L2 counter electrodes showed a Jsc of 15.7mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.64V, and an FF of 0.58, which led to an η of 5.8%. | What is the value of Voc? | 53534 |
{
"text": [
"16.52 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.04.028 | The DSSC with the Be2+(15)-TiO2/FTO layer showed increased values of Voc, Jsc, and FF, resulting in a PCE of 8.32% (Voc= 716 mV,Jsc= 16.52 mA/cm2, and FF= 70.36%), which was greater than that of the reference device with bare TiO2/FTO (PCE = 7.29%, Voc= 692 mV,Jsc= 15.47 mA/cm2, and FF= 68.16%). | What is the value of Jsc? | 27608 |
{
"text": [
"1.004 V"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA03066E | The optimized PCE of the devices prepared from w-PbI2 film is 15.49% with a Jsc of 20.74 mA cm−2, Voc of 1.004 V, and FF of 0.744, and its Jsc value is consistent with the integrated Jsc values of 20.20 mA cm−2 calculated from EQE spectrum (Fig. | What is the value of Voc? | 16118 |
{
"text": [
"3.42%"
],
"answer_start": [
117
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.002 | Finally, the TiO2 has been incorporated into the polymer electrolyte gel to improve the power conversion efficiency (3.42%) of the quasi solid state DSSC. | What is the value of efficiency? | 32199 |
{
"text": [
"0.98V"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.078 | In comparison, the maximum PCE of hybrid carbon based PSCs was 11.28% with a VOC of 0.98V and JSC of 18.26mAcm−2, that the photovoltaic performance was slightly improved. | What is the value of VOC? | 9252 |
{
"text": [
"6.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
57
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA11398A | As a result, the η value of the DSSC based on FNE48 (η = 6.2%) was superior to the DSSC based on FNE49 (η = 5.3%) using a liquid electrolyte. | What is the value of η? | 70334 |
{
"text": [
"3.10%"
],
"answer_start": [
139
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.016 | Finally, the structure triphenylamine + [1,2,5] thiadiazolo [3,4-c] pyridine + benzene + cyanoacetate sensitizer OKT-1 showed the best PCE 3.10% which was increased to 4.02% when co-sensitized with squaraine-derived dye SQ2.The authors declare no competing any financial, personal or other interests.Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at | What is the value of PCE? | 53474 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1039/C6CC02589G | The flexible solar cells built on plastic ITO-PEN film substrates exhibit a PCE as high as 13.4% and hysteresis-less performance in J–V curves. | What is substrate? | 22919 |
{
"text": [
"16.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1039/C9TA00654K | The PDO1- and PDO2-based devices show the best PCEs of 16.7% and 20.2%, respectively, and PDO2 even achieved a higher champion PCE than the reference HTM Spiro-OMeTAD (19.8%). | What is the value of PCE? | 12619 |
{
"text": [
"16.01mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
282
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.092 | It is observed that the bandgap of the brookite TiO2 is 0.11eV higher than anatase TiO2, which is consistent with the previous investigation On the other hand, JSC value increases from 17.96 to 19.17mAcm−2 when the film thickness is less than 19.3μm, and then drops dramatically to 16.01mAcm−2 once the film thickness exceeds 19.3μm. | What is the value of JSC? | 48476 |
{
"text": [
"18.87mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2010.03.034 | In the same geometry DSC, the widely used dye N719 gave Voc of 675mV, ff of 0.64, Jsc of 18.87mAcm−2, and η of 8.15%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 42874 |
{
"text": [
"59.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
173
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.156 | The flexible DSSC using a non-treated Ti foil shows a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 9.8 mA cm–2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 647 mV, and a fill factor (FF) of 59.1%, leading to an energy conversion efficiency (η) of 3.74%, whereas the DSSC using a treated Ti foil shows the comprehensively improved photovoltaic parameters and whose efficiency reaches 4.98%. | What is the value of FF? | 50994 |
{
"text": [
"10.71%"
],
"answer_start": [
71
]
} | 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63361-9 | Ultimately, the NDG/CoS enabled the DSSC to display the highest PCE of 10.71%. | What is the value of PCE? | 36797 |
{
"text": [
"8.18%"
],
"answer_start": [
113
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.01.025 | Therefore, the DSC with Ni-Co-S-1:1.5 CE exhibits the excellent photovoltaic performance with the PCE as high as 8.18% (Voc = 0.70 V, Jsc = 18.54 mA cm-2, and FF = 0.63), which is 29.2% larger than that of the DSC with Pt CE (PCE = 6.33%, Voc = 0.69 V, Jsc = 14.33 mA cm-2, and FF = 0.64). | What is the value of PCE? | 41523 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
29
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.056 | The N719-adsorbed mesoporous TiO2 photoanode was fabricated by our previous paper The composition of as-synthesized CoSeO3·2H2O and CoSeO3·2H2O/rGOy were characterized by X-ray Diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250XI, Thermo), and the XPS data were calibrated by C 1s (284.8eV) and fitted with XPSPEAK 4.0 software. | What is photoanode? | 44982 |
{
"text": [
"1000W/m2"
],
"answer_start": [
341
]
} | 10.1016/j.sna.2019.05.034 | Thus the incident light firstly reached the back side and only the part of light that wasn’t absorbed from the platinum, illuminated the TiO2 anode, which can justify the absence of EQE spectra at small wavelengths.Several devices, both FTO based and stainless steel based, were inspected using solar simulation equipment at illumination of 1000W/m2 (1.5A.M.). | What is the value of illumination? | 32922 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
146
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.161 | Photocurrent density-Voltage (J-V) performances were evaluated by sweeping the voltage using Keithley 2400 source meter under the illumination of 100mW/cm2. | What is the value of illumination? | 43755 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
61
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.06.093 | In order to sensitise the TiO2 electrodes, an active area of 0.25 cm2 was selected from the sintered electrode to be immersed in 0.5 mM of N-719 dye (Ru[LL′(NCS)2], L=2,2′-bypyridyl-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid, L′=2,20-bypyridyl-4,40-ditetrabutylammonium carboxylate) for 24 h at 50 °C in absolute ethanol. | What is the value of active area? | 34283 |
{
"text": [
"685 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
83
]
} | 10.1016/j.cclet.2015.03.008 | TX1 under the same condition shows η of 2.24%, with Jsc of 4.68 mA cm−2 and Voc of 685 mV. | What is the value of Voc? | 55614 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
303
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.12.033 | For the perovskite film deposited on FTO without UVO treatment, about 50% PL quenching was observed, which originates from the poor FTO/perovskite interface contact as shown in (d), the J–V curves of two typical ETL free PVKSCs with and without UVO treatment under simulated AM 1.5 G solar irradiation (100 mW/cm2) suggest that the UVO treatment of FTO substrate has significant impact on the final device performance. | What is the value of solar? | 6071 |
{
"text": [
"11.52 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.071 | The corresponding integrated current density from IPCE curves are 18.45and 11.52 mA/cm2 with a mismatch lower than 1%between the integrated JSC and measured JSC. | What is the value of JSC? | 5547 |
{
"text": [
"Pt"
],
"answer_start": [
25
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.086 | High performance for the Pt/HGF is attributed to the achievement of high electrocatalytic activity and efficient electron/ion transport, and it may serve as an alternative of pure Pt for DSSC-CEs and MOR catalysts.Supplementary data related to this article can be found at | What is CE? | 51723 |
{
"text": [
"1.78%"
],
"answer_start": [
308
]
} | 10.1039/C4NR00137K | Before using the Al reflecting layer, the DSSCs based on patterned ZnO–ZnS core–shell NWAs photoanodes with line symmetry exhibited a Voc of 0.49 V, a Jsc of 3.66 mA cm−2, a FF of 0.44 and a η of 0.87%, and with hexagonal symmetry demonstrated a Voc of 0.53 V, a Jsc of 6.24 mA cm−2, a FF of 0.49 and a η of 1.78% (Fig. | What is the value of η? | 61071 |
{
"text": [
"8.29%"
],
"answer_start": [
71
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00068E | The highest η values reported with DTF and TTF based DSSCs to date are 8.29% and 7.15%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 64913 |
{
"text": [
"2.657mA"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.026 | As the thickness increased from 10μm to 40μm, ISC increased from 1.122mA to 2.657mA, while PCE increased from 0.396% to 1.13%. | What is the value of ISC? | 34489 |
{
"text": [
"15.13mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.031 | The integrated Jsc from EQE for the planar device and the mesoporous device is 5.40mAcm−2 and 15.13mAcm−2, which is 7.32mAcm−2 and 2.11mAcm−2 smaller than those obtained from the J-V curves, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 9309 |
{
"text": [
"0.770V"
],
"answer_start": [
507
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.086 | The neat N719 and ETRC absorption spectrum shows broad absorption in the wavelength range of 300–705nm and 300–550nm respectively, wherein the N719 /ETRC mixture exhibits broader and higher absorption intensity.As per AM 1.5G (1 sun, 100mW/cm2), the conventional electrolyte based DSSCs exhibited a PCE of 5.72% (Jsc=11.10mA/cm2, Voc=0.747V and FF=0.69%) and on the other hand, the ETRC-1 and ETRC-2 displayed a higher PCE of 8.02% (Jsc=14.09mA/cm2, Voc=0.780V and FF=0.73%) and 7.60% (Jsc=13.65mA/cm2, Voc=0.770V and FF=0.72%) respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 48872 |
{
"text": [
"7.66%"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA14345G | Thus, for the NFB-based DSC, the slight decrease in PCE from 7.94% to 7.66% could be attributed to the decreased fill factor (FF). | What is the value of PCE? | 64432 |
{
"text": [
"ZnO"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
} | 10.1016/j.saa.2015.03.120 | The weak binding of natural dyes with the metal oxides (e.g., TiO2, ZnO, etc.) and the low charge transfer spectra of these dyes under solar spectrum usually limits the photo-conversion efficiencies of the cell. | What is ? | 35682 |
{
"text": [
"16.54%"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.03.042 | Under the same test condition, perovskite-PCBM-based PSCs shows a PCE of 16.54%, while device utilizing fullerene-free perovskite precursor exhibits a low PCE of 15.49% with large hysteresis.The TiO2 compact layer (titanium precursor: 350μL titanium (IV) isopropoxide and 25μL HCl in 5ml isopropanol), and the hole transport material precursor (72.5mg Spiro-OMeTAD, 28.5μL tBP and 17.5μL Li-TSFI stock solution (520mg/mL1 in acetonitrile) in 1mL chlorobenzene as dopants) were prepared as reported previously []. | What is the value of PCE? | 3356 |
{
"text": [
"0.159 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
25
]
} | 10.1016/j.poly.2014.05.045 | The photo-active area of 0.159 cm2 was defined by a black metal mask. | What is the value of active area? | 42965 |
{
"text": [
"57.73 ± 0.62%"
],
"answer_start": [
147
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.11.002 | However, in case of PH1000/PEI based semi-transparent perovskite device, Voc, Jsc, FF and PCE are improved to 0.76 ± 0.01 V, − 9.20 ± 0.17 mA/cm2, 57.73 ± 0.62% and 4.02 ± 0.09% respectively. | What is the value of FF? | 6551 |
{
"text": [
"0.99"
],
"answer_start": [
104
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE02194D | As a result, n–i–p PHJ PrSCs with SAM treatment showed a higher Voc (1.07 V) than the reference device (0.99 V) (Fig. | What is ? | 19964 |
{
"text": [
"0.466%"
],
"answer_start": [
351
]
} | 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102474 | All the cell parameter was measured at normal room (or lab) condition and the ambient temperature was 26–32°C., single individual red dye sensitized DSSC has shown better cell parameter (Isc=2.810mA, Voc=0.383mV, FF=0.494 and η=0.531%) compared to single individual green dye sensitized DSSC’s cell parameter (Isc=2.875mA, Voc=0.347mV, FF=0.486 and η=0.466%). | What is the value of η? | 42140 |
{
"text": [
"625mV"
],
"answer_start": [
112
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.09.016 | At the same time, the Ru/RGO electrode exhibited short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 14.78 (mA·cm−2), Voc of 625mV and Fill Factor (FF) of 73.37% which was better than those of values for Pt electrode. | What is the value of Voc? | 59617 |
{
"text": [
"0.666 V"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
} | 10.1039/C3RA47869F | The cell made from P25 NPs film (Cell 1) exhibits an open voltage (Voc) of 0.666 V, a short circuit density (Jsc) of 16.20 mA cm−2, a fill factor (FF) of 56.5% and conversion efficiency (η) of ∼6.12%. | What is the value of Voc? | 64864 |
{
"text": [
"589 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM15928G | 4 and Table 2, we obtained a solar energy to electricity conversion efficiency of 2.17% (Jsc = 5.29 mA cm−2, Voc = 589 mV, ff = 0.70), 4.21% (Jsc = 9.32 mA cm−2, Voc = 659 mV, ff = 0.69) and 3.12% (Jsc = 7.99 mA cm−2, Voc = 587 mV, ff = 0.67) with DSSCs based on PT1–PT3, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 64795 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
33
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.03.075 | The incident light intensity was 100mWcm−2 calibrated using a standard Si solar cell. | What is the value of light intensity? | 35461 |
{
"text": [
"10.05Ωcm2"
],
"answer_start": [
67
]
} | 10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.12.037 | In particular, at the optimized TPBi thickness of 3nm, Rs was only 10.05Ωcm2, reduced from 32.52Ωcm2 without TPBi. | What is the value of Rs? | 1618 |
{
"text": [
"0.53V"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.04.035 | The solar cells without HTL show relatively low performance, with short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 18.4mA/cm2, Voc of 0.53V, and fill factor (FF) of 0.45, and the PCE is only 4.5%. | What is the value of Voc? | 4590 |
{
"text": [
"1.05 V"
],
"answer_start": [
168
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA09824C | It can be seen that the PSC device based on TiO2 NRs prepared with a TBT concentration of 0.03 M shows a PCE of 14.55%, resulting from an open circuit voltage (VOC) of 1.05 V, current density (JSC) of 22.0 mA cm−2 and fill factor (FF) of 0.63. | What is the value of VOC? | 20586 |
{
"text": [
"12"
],
"answer_start": [
436
]
} | 10.1039/C4CP02522A | We anticipate that such a judicious synthetic strategy to tune pore structures and integral morphologies of single-crystal-like TiO2 crystals and further select appropriate porous crystals will open new perspectives for designing photovoltaic devices including dye-sensitized solar cells and perovskite-based hybrid solid-state solar cells.This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (21373083, 21203061), SRF for ROCS, SEM, SRFDP, Programme for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning, Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation (12ZR1407500), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WD1313009, WM1314018, WD1214036), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2012M511056, 2013T60425).† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: SEM and TEM images and the UV-vis spectra of samples. | What is TiO2? | 65116 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA01825H | The counter electrode (CE) was prepared by sputtering Pt on the FTO substrate. | What is substrate? | 76261 |
{
"text": [
"19.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA09543K | The IDIC based devices show reduced hysteresis with the reverse and forward scan PCEs of 19.1% and 16.9%, respectively, while the TiO2 based devices exhibit hysteresis with the reverse and forward scan PCEs of 17.4% and 14.2%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 19821 |
{
"text": [
"74.94%"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1016/j.ica.2017.05.056 | The PC61BM device exhibited a PCE of 15.04% (Voc= 0.93 V, Jsc= 21.49 mA cm−2, and FF = 74.94%), while the EDNC device obtained a PCE of 12.64% (Voc= 0.93 V, Jsc= 19.85 mA cm−2, and FF = 66.92%), which is comparable to the PC61BM device. | What is the value of FF? | 5610 |
{
"text": [
"16.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
109
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA01752A | By combining the high WF and optimized thickness of a GO thin film, GO-based PVSCs can achieve a high PCE of 16.5% with excellent device stability, which is superior to the reference device with the commonly used PEDOT:PSS as the HTM. | What is the value of PCE? | 17472 |
{
"text": [
"6.88%"
],
"answer_start": [
202
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.100 | The photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) of the DSSC assembled with PEDOT/rGO electrode reaches 7.79%, close to 8.33% of the cell with Platinum (Pt) electrode, and increases by 13.2% compared with 6.88% of the device with the PEDOT electrode.Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) as green power sources have attracted extensive attention in recent years because of its simple preparation, low cost, wide range of materials and no-pollution Possessing electron-donor ability and organic semiconductor nature, conductive polymers (CPs) are taken as potential CE electrocatalysts in liquid-junction DSSCs Herein, a PEDOT/rGO composite CE was prepared by electrochemical deposition of PEDOT/GO onto FTO electrode followed by electrochemical reduction. | What is the value of PCE? | 45466 |
{
"text": [
"0.72V"
],
"answer_start": [
187
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.057 | The results of the experiment indicate that Co3O4-CN directly derived from ZIF-67 as counter electrode show a low photovoltaic performance (η=4.53%) with an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.72V, a fill factor (FF) of 0.42 and a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 14.42mAcm−2. | What is the value of Voc? | 56237 |
{
"text": [
"2.21%"
],
"answer_start": [
41
]
} | 10.1039/C1NR11083G | The PCE prior to TiCl4 treatment reaches 2.21%, which is much higher than other SnO2 based systems. | What is the value of PCE? | 75873 |
{
"text": [
"72.65%"
],
"answer_start": [
214
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA27146D | The average photovoltaic performance parameters for the FTO-based device exhibit a PCE of 14.05%, open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.97 V, short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 20.04 mA cm−2, and fill factor (FF) of 72.65% for the reverse scanning direction, and a Jsc of 19.14 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.90 V, FF of 70.2%, and PCE of 12.1% for the forward scanning direction. | What is the value of FF? | 19731 |
{
"text": [
"8.66%"
],
"answer_start": [
93
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.11.044 | The perovskite solar cells prepared from 1.0M HPbI3 solution exhibit a relatively low PCE of 8.66%, and the average Voc, Jsc and FF are 854mV, 18.1mAcm−2, and 56.1%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 6287 |
{
"text": [
"60mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
88
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.012 | The intensity of the lamp was adjusted using a Si reference cell for light intensity of 60mWcm−2. | What is the value of light intensity of? | 24577 |
{
"text": [
"I3−/I−"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
} | 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117686 | R1 is the Faraday or charge-transfer resistance that is developed at the interface of redox reaction I3−/I− at the Pt counter electrode/electrolyte interface. | What is redox reaction? | 34621 |
{
"text": [
"68.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
79
]
} | 10.1039/C8EE00580J | After PDL treatment, the PVSC module shows dramatic enhancement in the FF from 68.6% to 76.5% and overall PCEs from 14.95% to 19.07%. | What is the value of FF? | 23003 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
165
]
} | 10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.012 | Devices were stored (without encapsulation or light blocking) and tested in the same nitrogen-filled glovebox.SCLC measurements were conducted on electron-only (FTO/TiO2/perovskite/PCBM/Ag) devices and hole-only devices (ITO/NiOx/perovskite/PTAA/Au), respectively. | What is FTO? | 11325 |
{
"text": [
"6.36%"
],
"answer_start": [
17
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.127 | The highest η of 6.36% was found for the DSSC sensitized with the co-sensitizer at the molar ratio of 6:4 (JD1:SQ2), and values of 0.64V, 15.13mAcm−2, and 0.66 are obtained for its VOC, JSC and FF, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 39767 |
{
"text": [
"1.03V"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.12.030 | AZO:O3/CH3NH3PbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/Au devices show champion JSC, VOC and η of 20.92mA/cm2, 1.03V and 10.5% respectively. | What is the value of VOC? | 3396 |
{
"text": [
"1.05 V"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA09362H | Surprisingly, for the SCOS device, the Jsc, Voc and FF are found to be 23.65 mA cm−2, 1.05 V and 72.4%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 22806 |
{
"text": [
"SPG"
],
"answer_start": [
58
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA09505D | More importantly, robust electrochemical stability of the SPG CE is also demonstrated, indicative of its great potential toward Pt replacement. | What is CE? | 72635 |
{
"text": [
"650 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
71
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00068E | On the other hand, T13 showed an enhanced Jsc of 15.09 mA cm−2, Voc of 650 mV and FF of 0.729, resulting in an efficiency of 7.15%. | What is the value of Voc? | 64900 |
{
"text": [
"16.3 mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
69
]
} | 10.1039/C2EE23988D | The highest efficiency was recorded with the TFRS-52 device of JSC = 16.3 mAcm−2, VOC = 860 mV, FF = 0.72, and η = 10.1%. | What is the value of JSC? | 73726 |
{
"text": [
"2%"
],
"answer_start": [
50
]
} | 10.1039/C4EE01724B | In a similar report by Matteocci et al., an η of ∼2% (VOC ∼ 0.3.2 V, ISC ∼ 22 mA, FF ∼ 0.39) was achieved on a TCO-based device on an active area of ∼14 cm2. | What is the value of η? | 68563 |
{
"text": [
"0.593V"
],
"answer_start": [
57
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.09.056 | The Voc of the dimeric spiro-dyes TT1T (0.589V) and T1T (0.593V) are also higher than that of TT1 (0.568V) may be result of increased resultant dipole moment of T1T due to increase the angle in between two monomeric dye strands. | What is the value of Voc? | 28005 |
{
"text": [
"12.56%"
],
"answer_start": [
19
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.05.028 | The average PCE of 12.56%, Jsc of 19.99 mA/cm2, Voc of 0.99 V and FF of 63% could be achieved.c), CH3NH3PbI3 film is very uniform and compact. | What is the value of PCE? | 6518 |
{
"text": [
"13.98 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
78
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.07.028 | The optimized device with a 35 nm CH3NH3PbI3−XClX shows a JSC, VOC, and FF of 13.98 mA/cm2, 0.77 V, and 0.68, respectively, corresponding to a PCE of 7.27%. | What is the value of JSC? | 6752 |
{
"text": [
"4.05%"
],
"answer_start": [
45
]
} | 10.1039/C1JM12710A | A photoelectric conversion efficiency (η) of 4.05% is obtained for the DSSC fabricated with the iodine-free electrolyte without KI, and the DSSC assembled with 5 wt% KI achieved the maximum efficiency of 5.87% with Jsc, Voc and FF of 14.11 mA cm−2, 0.71 V and 0.59, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 66334 |
{
"text": [
"18.03%"
],
"answer_start": [
81
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR04692H | Notably, the PEDOT:PSS V2O5 composite HTM based device obtained a maximum PCE of 18.03% with a Voc exceeding 1.0 V. | What is the value of PCE? | 21898 |
{
"text": [
"7.41%"
],
"answer_start": [
195
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.067 | The DSSC with the N/S-PC CE exhibits a short circuit current (Jsc) of 14.42mA/cm2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.728V, a fill factor (FF) of 0.706 and a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 7.41%. | What is the value of PCE? | 45592 |
{
"text": [
"1 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
230
]
} | 10.1016/j.saa.2014.07.096 | Finally the solid residue was filtered to acquire a pure natural dye solution.The TiO2 working electrode was prepared by deposition of TiO2 paste on FTO glass (Sheet resistance 10 Ω sq.−1; BHEL, India) with the active area of 1 × 1 cm2 according to the procedure described elsewhere The absorption spectra of the extracts obtained from grasses were recorded using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (UV-2450, Shimadzu). | What is the value of active area? | 25517 |
{
"text": [
"18.22%"
],
"answer_start": [
88
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.012 | Then, at the CsBr layer thickness of 10nm, the PSC devices exhibited the highest PCE of 18.22%, with a Voc of 1.06V, Jsc of 22.82mAcm−2 and FF of 75.4%. | What is the value of PCE? | 11053 |
{
"text": [
"74.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
154
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.003 | And after thickness was further increased to 15 µm, a champion PCE as high as 14.07% was achieved, with the Voc of 0.899 V, Jsc of 21.03 mA/cm2 and FF of 74.4% (d). | What is the value of FF? | 9668 |
{
"text": [
"PEDOT"
],
"answer_start": [
27
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.12.031 | In addition, this flexible PEDOT and Pt/PEDOT CEs are suitable for fabricating all flexible DSSCs. | What is CE? | 38763 |