| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | |
| [01:17] <lotuspsychje> good morning | |
| [02:08] <Maik> geez, you're up early | |
| [06:27] <ducasse> good morning | |
| [06:28] * TJ- waves | |
| [08:25] <lordievader> Good morning | |
| [09:03] <marcoagpinto> Heya! | |
| [10:58] <daftykins> TJ-: another all-nighter? ;) | |
| [12:07] <TJ-> daftykins: actually no; came in late ... 5am :) | |
| [12:08] <daftykins> hah | |
| [12:09] <daftykins> TJ-: i ended up converting that encrypted install to EFI the other day, as i discovered Xen runs EFI guests much quicker than legacy ones - maybe it has to do some kind of emulation that causes a performance hit, boot time is vastly reduced | |
| [12:15] <TJ-> daftykins: I wonder if that is because it has to emulate x86 real-mode transitions for BIOS mode guests, whereas with UEFI it can remain in protected mode | |
| [12:16] <daftykins> *shrug* i should note the XCP-ng host is installed in EFI | |
| [12:54] <Thaurwylth> At what point does a nightly build usually start resembling a later beta release? I know that this is a not very well posed question and also it requires you to wait and only answer the question retroactively, but I think it is still kiiiiiiindofan interesting question. | |
| [15:18] <TJ-> not until feature-freeze | |