| [02:14] <callmepk> good morning | |
| [03:34] <duflu> Morning callmepk | |
| [03:34] <callmepk> morning duflu | |
| [04:42] <KGB-1> gnome-control-center ubuntu/master Marco Trevisan * [open] merge request !19: ubuntu panel and display: Monitor and fractional scaling fixes * https://deb.li/3mlwF | |
| [04:53] <duflu> Awesome Trevinho | |
| [04:54] * duflu wonders if it's late night or early morning | |
| [05:02] <Trevinho> duflu: well both :D | |
| [05:34] <didrocks> good morning | |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | |
| [06:04] <duflu> Hi didrocks and seb128 | |
| [06:07] <didrocks> hey duflu | |
| [06:08] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers | |
| [06:09] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN | |
| [06:23] <didrocks> salut oSoMoN | |
| [06:23] <seb128> hey duflu, lut oSoMoN, didrocks, how are you doing today? | |
| [06:23] <duflu> seb128, OK. Slightly less overwhelmed than yesterday but still keen on a weekend, and maybe a week off some time soon. Not sure... How are you? | |
| [06:28] <seb128> I'm alright but days are buuusy and I struggle to do what I want, my todolist goes in the wrong direction as a result :/ | |
| [06:28] <seb128> (and I'm on +1 maintainance today so probably going to get even more behind) | |
| [06:29] <seb128> what are you working on atm? | |
| [06:29] <duflu> seb128, now going deep into why 4K performance is poor (and CPU usage is low at the same time) | |
| [06:29] <duflu> which is a general performance problem for everyone. Only I can see it better now | |
| [06:31] <duflu> Close to my heart, because without a fix I would have to upgrade my desktops | |
| [06:36] <didrocks> good good :) | |
| [06:38] <seb128> duflu, good luck figuring it out! | |
| [06:40] <duflu> It's interesting. I don't remember ever having exhausted all CPU problems and being left with only GPU bottlenecks. Not since university at least | |
| [06:40] <duflu> Though technically we didn't have GPUs back then. They were only graphics cards | |
| [06:44] <oSoMoN> hey duflu | |
| [06:44] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks, seb128 | |
| [07:47] <didrocks> fixing cryptsetup FTBFS which is in proposed for a week :/ | |
| [07:47] <didrocks> seems the proper install was only done for risc | |
| [07:48] <didrocks> weird, the .install list the missing files: scripts/cryptsetup.conf /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/ | |
| [07:48] <didrocks> and it’s not arch-specific | |
| [07:54] <didrocks> dh_missing: warning: usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/cryptsetup.conf exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere | |
| [07:54] <didrocks> didrocks@casanier:/tmp/cryptsetup-2.3.3$ find . -name cryptsetup.conf | |
| [07:55] <didrocks> ./debian/cryptsetup-bin/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/cryptsetup.conf | |
| [07:55] <didrocks> ./debian/tmp/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/cryptsetup.conf | |
| [07:55] <didrocks> O_o oh dh_missing, what are you doing to us | |
| [07:55] <didrocks> (and no diff in the file) | |
| [07:59] <didrocks> ok, dh_missing is basing now on helper by the various tools | |
| [07:59] <didrocks> not a diff itself | |
| [08:00] <didrocks> and in debian/.debhelper/generated/cryptsetup-bin/installed-by-dh_install, dh_install is using the original file path | |
| [08:00] <didrocks> not the one moved in the .install | |
| [08:02] <Laney> \O\ |O| /O/ | |
| [08:06] <didrocks> hey Laney | |
| [08:07] <Laney> greetings didrocks | |
| [08:07] <Laney> having fun? | |
| [08:07] <didrocks> yeah, didn’t know dh_missing changed behavior that way | |
| [08:10] <seb128> hey Laney, how are you? | |
| [08:10] <didrocks> changing to usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/cryptsetup.conf works and now builds on all arch (which are not risc :p) | |
| [08:14] <Laney> moin seb128 | |
| [08:14] <Laney> i'm good, enjoying watching the rain | |
| [08:14] <Laney> you? | |
| [08:15] <Laney> thanks for looking at the team report thing | |
| [08:15] <Laney> I changed that url to be compressed yesterday | |
| [08:15] <seb128> Laney, I'm alright thanks! | |
| [08:17] <seb128> Laney, np for the team report, now I need to try to understand the report changes, is the format of that file documented somewhere btw? | |
| [08:18] <Laney> no | |
| [08:20] <Laney> presumably the problem with update-excuse bugs is that now the yaml contains the verdict (PASS) for those and the code doesn't expect that | |
| [08:21] <Laney> https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu/tree/britney2/policies/lpexcusebugs.py?h=ubuntu/rebased#n73 | |
| [08:23] <seb128> right, the problem is https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-scripts/trunk/view/head:/generate-team-p-m#L260 | |
| [08:23] <Laney> would it be better if that actually put the bugs in a named entry? | |
| [08:23] <Laney> so it was like | |
| [08:23] <Laney> update-excuse: | |
| [08:23] <seb128> it expect item['policy_info']['autopkgtest'] to include a package name | |
| [08:23] <Laney> bugs: [...] | |
| [08:23] <Laney> verdict: PASS | |
| [08:23] <seb128> ah, you are speaking about the bug problem there, sorry, I was on the exception one | |
| [08:24] <Laney> ah | |
| [08:24] <seb128> I didn't look at the bug problem yet, just saw it on the page generated when I did skip over the exception problem | |
| [08:26] <Laney> hmm I don't see the problem with autopkgtest, it looks the same to me | |
| [08:27] <Laney> well it also has the verdict too | |
| [08:31] * Laney asks upstream about that, feels more sensible to fix the structure of the yaml to me | |
| [08:31] <Laney> autopkgtest: | |
| [08:31] <Laney> policy_results: | |
| [08:31] <Laney> foo/1: ... | |
| [08:31] <Laney> verdict: PASS | |
| [08:31] <Laney> or something | |
| [08:43] <marcustomlinson> oh, logged in and forgot to say hi | |
| [08:43] <marcustomlinson> morning desktoppers | |
| [08:44] <didrocks> hey marcustomlinson | |
| [08:46] <seb128> Laney, not always, see l12248 from your yaml | |
| [08:46] <seb128> autopkgtest: | |
| [08:46] <seb128> verdict: REJECTED_TEMPORARILY | |
| [08:46] <seb128> block: | |
| [08:46] <seb128> the old file didn't have instances with no package listed | |
| [08:47] <seb128> hey marcustomlinson, how are you? | |
| [08:48] <marcustomlinson> hey didrocks and seb128, doing alright thanks, you? | |
| [08:49] <seb128> marcustomlinson, I'm alright, a bit tired but coffee solved part of it :) | |
| [08:49] <marcustomlinson> I feel you | |
| [08:50] <didrocks> marcustomlinson: good good, thx :) | |
| [08:52] <Laney> seb128: what about it? | |
| [08:53] <Laney> moin marcustomlinson | |
| [08:53] <seb128> Laney, that autopkgtest section has 0 package entry, is that legit? | |
| [08:53] <seb128> as said there is no case of this happening before your rebase | |
| [08:55] <Laney> I'm just trying to check what you're saying | |
| [08:55] <seb128> Laney, sorry, I might be not clear, the by-team report fails on | |
| [08:55] <seb128> for package, results in sorted(item['policy_info']['autopkgtest'].items()): | |
| [08:56] <seb128> basically it expect the policy_info/autopkgtest sections to have a least a package/result combo | |
| [08:56] <Laney> there are cases of that, it's just that they were actually empty rather than having a verdict only | |
| [08:56] <seb128> ah | |
| [08:56] <seb128> k, so I just need to teach the code to deal with having a verdict only | |
| [08:56] <marcustomlinson> morgen Laney | |
| [08:56] <seb128> thx, I didn't notice that there were empty section, those files are big and a bit tricky to navigate | |
| [08:57] <Laney> np | |
| [08:57] <Laney> if upstream agrees I'll change that to be better | |
| [08:57] <Laney> so this might not be the final final structure | |
| [08:57] <seb128> Laney, I just found another issue | |
| [08:57] <seb128> Laney, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/laney/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#dovecot | |
| [08:58] <seb128> missing build on all: mail-stack-delivery (from 1:2.3.7.2-1ubuntu4) | |
| [08:58] <seb128> arch:all not built yet, autopkgtest delayed | |
| [08:58] <seb128> where the current report has | |
| [08:58] <seb128> missing build on i386: mail-stack-delivery (from 1:2.3.7.2-1ubuntu4) | |
| [08:58] <seb128> Not considered | |
| [08:58] <seb128> | |
| [08:58] <seb128> we don't have "arch all' builds in Ubuntu | |
| [08:58] <seb128> so the new summary is more confusing imho | |
| [08:59] <Laney> fair | |
| [08:59] <seb128> also let me know if IRC comments are not the best way to give the feedback, maybe it's easier to track by replies on the list | |
| [09:00] <seb128> or bug reports? | |
| [09:00] <Laney> this is ok for now | |
| [09:01] <seb128> k | |
| [09:01] <Laney> bug reports once it's live | |
| [09:01] <seb128> ah, now it does trigger tests on archs that built even if one is failing | |
| [09:01] <seb128> that's nice :) | |
| [09:01] <seb128> (though probably waste some resources if the build is failing and the item is never going to be candidate) | |
| [09:21] <didrocks> seriously https://launchpadlibrarian.net/484788335/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-riscv64.cryptsetup_2%3A2.3.3-1ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz | |
| [09:21] <didrocks> so the file is installed everywhere, but risk | |
| [09:21] <didrocks> risc* | |
| [09:31] <Laney> O_O | |
| [09:33] <didrocks> that explained why it built on risc previously and why the hack was done just to build there | |
| [09:40] <Laney> didrocks: at a quick glance: missing build-dep on systemd / passing of --with-tmpfilesdir=/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/? | |
| [09:42] <didrocks> Laney: it seems that Steeve chose the option to directly copy from source, so to minimize his diff, I will do this conditionally before dh_install on riscv | |
| [09:43] <Laney> I think it's weird to be implementing a solution just because systemd randomly isn't installed on that arch | |
| [09:44] <Laney> Passing the configure flag would bypass that requirement | |
| [09:47] <didrocks> Laney: yeah, I agree, I wanted to minimize the diff, but if we have risc machine I can access by pushing on a ppa, I’m fine trying this ^ | |
| [09:49] <didrocks> I find it sad this package to be blocked in proposed for a week, only building on one arch, blocking our encryption work because it’s not a priority to fix it apparently | |
| [09:50] <Laney> didrocks: BI LE TOOOOOOOOOOOOO | |
| [09:51] <Laney> yeah that is a bit sad | |
| [09:51] <didrocks> I need to find how it works without a branch | |
| [09:51] <didrocks> yeah, giving the work to fix to other people | |
| [09:51] <Laney> bileto? | |
| [09:51] <Laney> 'build', get a ppa, then you can dput to it | |
| [09:52] <didrocks> let’s give it a try | |
| [09:55] <Laney> it's like god coming back to the civilisation he created many generations later | |
| [09:55] <Laney> 'you did WHAT?' | |
| [09:55] * Laney strokes the spreadsheet | |
| [09:55] <didrocks> heh :) | |
| [09:55] <didrocks> uploaded, let’s see | |
| [10:49] <seb128> Laney, btw are the autopkgtest discussions happening on an IRC channel (asking so I could join and keep en eye on those :) | |
| [10:50] <Laney> seb128: in ubuntu-release if there are any, or on the trello board https://trello.com/b/tjbSeNWo/autopkgtest, or sometimes the Launchpad project https://launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/ | |
| [11:05] <duflu> Belated good morning to Laney and anyone else I missed | |
| [11:05] <duflu> And good nigh | |
| [11:06] <duflu> t | |
| [11:06] <duflu> Oops. It's not even morning there. Yeah I am late for dinner | |
| [11:08] <Laney> heh | |
| [11:23] <seb128> Laney, I meant the upstream discussions you mentioned | |
| [11:24] <Laney> oh | |
| [11:24] <Laney> #debian-release | |
| [11:24] <Laney> or sometimes #debci | |
| [11:24] <seb128> thx | |
| [11:42] <KGB-2> gnome-control-center tags 1a911d5 Sebastien Bacher upstream/3.36.3 * Upstream version 3.36.3 * https://deb.li/8SzD | |
| [11:43] <KGB-2> gnome-control-center pristine-tar 239a935 Sebastien Bacher gnome-control-center_3.36.3.orig.tar.xz.delta gnome-control-center_3.36.3.orig.tar.xz.id * pristine-tar data for gnome-control-center_3.36.3.orig.tar.xz * https://deb.li/3osUz | |
| [11:43] <KGB-2> gnome-control-center upstream/latest 6373b71 Sebastien Bacher * pushed 18 commits * https://deb.li/miay | |
| [11:53] <KGB-2> gnome-control-center signed tags 02eba19 Sebastien Bacher ubuntu/1%3.36.3-1ubuntu1 * gnome-control-center Debian release 1:3.36.3-1ubuntu1 * https://deb.li/3fsjg | |
| [11:53] <KGB-2> gnome-control-center ubuntu/master 41950aa Sebastien Bacher * pushed 30 commits (first 5 follow) * https://deb.li/MYuN | |
| [11:53] <KGB-2> gnome-control-center ubuntu/master 27e6b16 Cheng-Chia Tseng po/zh_TW.po * Update Chinese (Taiwan) translation * https://deb.li/ikiRx | |
| [11:53] <KGB-2> gnome-control-center ubuntu/master 01b6985 Yi-Jyun Pan po/zh_TW.po * Update Chinese (Taiwan) translation * https://deb.li/7eUv | |
| [11:54] <KGB-2> gnome-control-center ubuntu/master 4f53ea3 Yi-Jyun Pan po/zh_TW.po * Update Chinese (Taiwan) translation * https://deb.li/3ri1n | |
| [11:54] <KGB-2> gnome-control-center ubuntu/master fdbbc2f Marco Trevisan (Treviño) debian/patches/0031-fingerprint-dialog-Don-t-limit-the-number-of-maximum.patch * account-fingerprint: Don't make flowbox children selectable * https://deb.li/asFs | |
| [11:54] <KGB-2> gnome-control-center ubuntu/master 88bd021 sicklylife po/ja.po * Update Japanese translation * https://deb.li/3M7TU | |
| [11:54] <KGB-2> gnome-control-center ubuntu/master Sebastien Bacher * [merge] merge request !19: ubuntu panel and display: Monitor and fractional scaling fixes * https://deb.li/3mlwF | |
| [11:56] <Trevinho> seb128: mergin! | |
| [11:56] <seb128> Trevinho, hey, good morning :) thanks for the fixes! | |
| [11:56] <Trevinho> unfortunately they were not one-liners.... but well. | |
| [12:03] <oSoMoN> ricotz, FYI, I successfully built and used nodejs 12.18.0 to build firefox 78.0~b8 (groovy) in https://launchpad.net/~osomon/+archive/ubuntu/nodejs-12.18-groovy/+packages, will try to get it sponsored | |
| [12:07] <KGB-2> glib ubuntu/focal c220732 Iain Lane debian/ control control.in gbp.conf * control, gbp.conf: Use the ubuntu/focal branch * https://deb.li/3kSd0 | |
| [12:07] <KGB-2> glib ubuntu/focal 4ae4943 Iain Lane debian/changelog * Update changelog * https://deb.li/iWs32 | |
| [12:07] <KGB-2> glib ubuntu/focal 8dc62bf Iain Lane debian/changelog * Finalise changelog * https://deb.li/peOC | |
| [12:07] <KGB-2> glib ubuntu/focal e554968 Iain Lane debian/gbp.conf * gbp.conf: Add the ubuntu tag pattern too * https://deb.li/3jimG | |
| [12:07] <KGB-2> glib signed tags ff12c4f Iain Lane ubuntu/2.64.3-1_ubuntu20.04.1 * glib2.0 Debian release 2.64.3-1~ubuntu20.04.1 * https://deb.li/1sPc | |
| [13:56] <xnox> Laney: did you have time to look into ubiquity subtree/squash/submodules? i feel like merging subtree version, and just rolling with it. | |
| [13:57] <xnox> Laney: if it becomes tricky, we can rewrite history and do something else later. | |
| [13:57] <Laney> xnox: will do in a minute, subtree not the others | |
| [13:57] <Laney> unless subtree is total shit but I'm sure it's not | |
| [13:58] <xnox> Laney: ack. | |
| [13:58] <xnox> Laney: clone it, build it, check git log -p in a d-i/sources/$project, check git log -p from top level, check gitk => it should give you a good feel of what it feels like. | |
| [13:59] <xnox> (especially what the history looks like) | |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g_ | |
| === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g | |
| [15:55] <Laney> xnox: sorry, meetinghs, looking now! | |
| [16:04] <Laney> xnox: are you imagining people just commit to the d-i stuff in there or what? | |
| [16:05] <xnox> Laney: they can, but they don't have to. | |
| [16:06] <xnox> Laney: i.e. when merging from debian it might be easier to do it from lp:$project into lp:~ubuntu-installer/$project, and then subtree pull from lp:~ubuntu-installer/$project | |
| [16:06] <Laney> right | |
| [16:06] <xnox> Laney: but when patching in new ubuntu delta => it can be easier to do "commit d-i add foo api", "commit ubiquity use foo api" | |
| [16:06] <xnox> Laney: in that case a merge proposal will modify things inline. | |
| [16:07] <Laney> only easier up until the next merge from debian | |
| [16:07] <xnox> that | |
| [16:07] <Laney> on the other hand if you could do the merge right in there ... | |
| [16:07] <xnox> but i also worry that salsa will move to tango, lp git <-> git salsa mirrors stop working, and we loose history. | |
| [16:07] <xnox> Laney: so merging right there should work. | |
| [16:07] <xnox> Laney: from top level of ubiqutiy $ git pull salsa:partman-base => should do the right thing | |
| [16:08] <xnox> but i'm not sure if "rebase" will work. | |
| [16:08] <Laney> might be good to write some quick recipes in debian/readme.how-to-work-this-thing | |
| [16:08] <xnox> (git will realise that all of the partman-base is now under d-i/source/partman-base and merge things into there. | |
| [16:08] <xnox> ) | |
| [16:08] <xnox> Laney: well ideally, we would have had the new installer by now right =) | |
| [16:09] <xnox> more readmes yes => but i was hoping to right them, as I go along and figure out the ropes of things. | |
| [16:09] <Laney> you might say that | |
| [16:09] <Laney> ok | |
| [16:09] <Laney> make an empty one that says 'if you do a new thing, write it in here, so that the next person can copy what you did' | |
| [16:09] <xnox> ack | |
| [16:09] <Laney> the history of this is super weird | |
| [16:10] <Laney> like git-ubuntu stuff and upstream stuff | |
| [16:10] <xnox> yeah | |
| [16:10] <xnox> cause we have some "ubuntu-only" projects, and i had to take something for them. | |
| [16:10] <Laney> git-ubuntu is like the 'delta' I guess | |
| [16:10] <xnox> unless you want to kill wubi support => because i think the partman-loop is the weird one. | |
| [16:11] <xnox> yeah, i mostly took d-i upstream git repo, upto the current merge-base with ubuntu, and slapped a single commit of ubuntu delta on top of that, and then subtree merge that | |
| [16:12] <Laney> d/rules update can go no? | |
| [16:12] <xnox> it still generates debian/control B-D from d-i/sources/*/debian/control | |
| [16:12] <Laney> well the get-sources stuff | |
| [16:12] <xnox> (ie. see https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/partman-base/log/ ) | |
| [16:12] <xnox> Laney: it's a no-op | |
| [16:13] <xnox> i think i did patch the script that tries to update => but it does regenerate debian/control each time. | |
| [16:13] <xnox> in some ways git submodules is easier to understand, cause it says that path over there is git repo lp:~ubuntu-installer/$project => go edit that. | |
| [16:14] <xnox> but then it's submodules, and 20 repos. | |
| [16:17] <Laney> right, neither way is perfect | |
| [16:17] <Laney> pyflakes test fails btw :> | |
| [16:22] <xnox> Yeah fixed in master | |
| [16:23] <Laney> merge ittttt | |
| [16:29] <abeato> kenvandine, hey, maybe you know, how can you set wayland as the default for a user in the greeter? so it is set on first boot? | |
| [16:31] <kenvandine> not sure about as the default | |
| [16:31] <kenvandine> abeato: you just need to select the wayland session for the user in gdm | |
| [16:31] <kenvandine> abeato: and it'll remember that until you change it again | |
| [16:32] <kenvandine> at first boot is probably a session file | |
| [16:41] <abeato> kenvandine, right, but this is for a project where they want auto-login, so I actually need to know to do this by changing a config file | |
| [16:42] <didrocks> Laney: oh btw, your suggestion for cryptsetup works very well, thanks! | |
| [16:42] <abeato> kenvandine, but I do not know where | |
| [16:42] <Laney> 😘 | |
| [16:42] <kenvandine> abeato: Laney probably knows | |
| [16:51] <Laney> afaik gdm calculates the default session by itself, i don't know how to overrride it (if ou can) | |
| [16:59] <xnox> Laney: "merge ittttt" just the pyflakes fixes into submodules/subtree/squash, or do you mean switching to subtrees? | |
| [17:05] <Laney> xnox: I just approved the MP (but with a comment about documentation) | |
| [17:05] <Laney> now I'm off until Monday, have fun burning it down | |
| [17:05] <Laney> o/ | |