| === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant | |
| [02:43] <mwhudson> huh libgit2 1.0.0 | |
| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | |
| [10:57] <rbalint> xnox, thanks this is TIL :-) | |
| [11:12] <juliank> chrisccoulson: do you want to submit the grub patch for bug 1878541 upstream? I think we can discuss it there? | |
| [11:12] <ubottu> bug 1878541 in grub2 (Ubuntu Groovy) "Grub fails to load kernel from squashfs if mem < 1500mb" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1878541 | |
| [11:12] <juliank> grub-devel@gnu.org | |
| [11:12] <juliank> chrisccoulson: certainly sounds like the correct approach to me | |
| [11:12] * juliank can push it upstream too | |
| [11:33] <irreleph4nt> Hi. Quick question: Does Ubuntu support dbus-broker as a replacement for dbus-daemon? Google yields no useful results for that query. Thank you. | |
| [11:35] <xnox> irreleph4nt: at the moment, dbus-broker is still experimental and lacks feature parity. For example, whilst basic functionality is available. LSM mitigation are not. Thus using dbus-broker is less secure, than regular dbus. | |
| [11:36] <xnox> and we do use dbus apparmor mitigations by default, to secure leaking information over dbus from host to confined snaps. And vice versa. | |
| [11:36] <irreleph4nt> xnox, thank you. So it sounds like using broker instead of daemon currently is anything between discouraged and impossible. Noted. :) | |
| [11:37] <xnox> irreleph4nt: but otherwise one can experiment/install dbus-broker if one wants to. But you will get to keep both pieces or like help to improve integrating it. | |
| [11:37] <xnox> irreleph4nt: i wish it was easier to use, but it currently is not. | |
| === irreleph4nt is now known as Guest7554 | |
| [11:41] <irreleph4nt> xnox, what you've said gives off the impression though that work is being done to get broker into Ubuntu. Is that right? I found a github issue against dbus which mentions AppArmor. It was raised in 2018 and is open to this day | |
| [11:46] <xnox> irreleph4nt: no, i didn't say anything remotely to that effect. | |
| [11:46] <xnox> irreleph4nt: i'm not aware of anybody currently working on LSM mitigations in broker. | |
| [11:47] <xnox> check with upstream if that has changed. But that's what the status of this was since the inception of the project. | |
| [11:47] <irreleph4nt> Okay, noted. Thanks again :) | |
| === helio|afk is now known as heliocastro | |
| [13:16] <rbasak> ahasenack: o/ I pinged you in https://github.com/certbot/certbot/issues/7954 but not sure if that means you see it. | |
| [13:16] <ahasenack> just replied | |
| [13:16] <rbasak> Oh | |
| [13:16] <rbasak> Thanks :) | |
| [13:16] <ahasenack> I saw it | |
| [13:36] <seb128> wgrant, hey, any chance you could investigate what's wrong with pulseaudio on riscv? dunno what changed but a test is failing in focal and groovy now, which is annoying because it means the recent SRU with important fixes is getting blocked now :/ | |
| [13:37] <seb128> though the security update got published with the arch failure it seems | |
| [13:41] <jalt> Hi, where can I find documentation for subiquity (or ubiquity) unattended installations of 20.04 (#ubuntu-installer points to here)? | |
| [14:03] <coreycb> cpaelzer: hi, do you think we could get python3-ironicclient into main as of focal? it's py2 counterpart used to be in main. | |
| [14:04] <coreycb> bug 1376238 | |
| [14:04] <ubottu> bug 1376238 in python-ironicclient (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-ironicclient" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1376238 | |
| [14:07] <jdstrand> riscv64 is considered a 'bonus' architecture for security updates. note, 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.1 also ftbfs on riscv64. the security updates was built on top of 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3 which did build | |
| [14:08] <jdstrand> I don't know if it was a toolchain chain. ubuntu3 built, ubuntu3.1 didn't (had part of the sru patch but not security), ubuntu3.2 ftbfs (had the security patch but not the sru patch) | |
| [14:08] <jdstrand> toolchain change* | |
| [14:09] <jdstrand> ubuntu3.3 and ubuntu5 have both the sru and the security patch | |
| [14:28] <jdstrand> fyi seb128 ^ | |
| [14:28] <jdstrand> (and wgrant ^) | |
| [14:29] <jdstrand> ('bonus' for focal at this point; presumably some day it will be offical) | |
| [14:43] <seb128> jdstrand, thanks | |