| [00:16] <tumbleweed> what version of autodep8 is the CI infrastructure using? | |
| [00:17] <tumbleweed> if it's from from 18.04, it'd explain the r-bioc-rhdf5 failure and I can stop tearing hair out (missing tset dep) | |
| [01:14] <vorlon> tumbleweed: autodep8 is deployed from https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/+git/autodep8 | |
| [01:15] <vorlon> seems to be 0.19 | |
| [01:15] <vorlon> so not 18.04, but older than what's in focal, to be sure | |
| [01:18] <Eickmeyer> Quick question: what is the proper versioning for a Debian package that needs to be SRU'd? For instance, if it's 0.24.8~dfsg0-1 would it be 0.24.8~dfsg0-1~20.04.1 or 0.24.8~dfsg0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1? | |
| [01:22] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: recommending versioning scheme here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging | |
| [01:22] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: ta | |
| [01:25] <Eickmeyer> (I was close with my second example) | |
| [01:27] <vorlon> tumbleweed: correction, looks like that branch is up-to-date with 0.22 | |
| [03:16] <tumbleweed> vorlon: with what apt sources available? | |
| [03:16] <tumbleweed> (the R stuff uses grep-aptavail) | |
| [03:16] <tumbleweed> well, more to the point, grep-dctrl | |
| [03:19] <tumbleweed> no, the aptavail is what matters | |
| [03:20] <tumbleweed> so, I'm guessing xenial | |
| [05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libclamunrar [amd64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [0.102.3-2] (no packageset) | |
| [05:41] <vorlon> tumbleweed: er, it runs grep-dctrl against a file in the package source, doesn't it? (DESCRIPTION) | |
| [06:13] <tumbleweed> vorlon: yes, but it gets the list of R modules available in the world, from apt | |
| [06:13] <tumbleweed> there was a force-reset-test for it. commented and bumped | |
| [06:13] <vorlon> tumbleweed: ah. ok, that seems rather terrible | |
| [06:14] <tumbleweed> indeed | |
| [06:14] <tumbleweed> we colud hack it to look at lists of packages that we maintain separately, but ick | |
| [06:16] <tumbleweed> I guess it's a sign that autopkgtests are maturing, that this release a lot of the issues I'm looking at are specific to Ubuntu's test-runner environment's difference to debian | |
| [08:18] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, you were right, missing "+x" on init file | |
| [08:18] <LocutusOfBorg> damn MoM bugs! | |
| [08:19] <LocutusOfBorg> and thanks! | |
| [08:19] <Laney> tumbleweed: Sounds like a bug in autodep8 :( | |
| [08:19] <Laney> does Debian provide that guarantee? | |
| [08:19] <LocutusOfBorg> uploading on bileto, lets see | |
| [08:34] <Laney> I guess we should check snakefruit to see if anything to stuck after the networking incident yesterday | |
| [08:34] <Laney> that's happened before | |
| [08:34] * Laney does | |
| [08:36] <Laney> heh, there was a run of https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing-ports/ from Apr 26 | |
| [08:36] <Laney> such a used service | |
| [08:36] <Laney> looks ok apart from that | |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | |
| === ergiusenss is now known as sergiusens | |
| [10:39] <doko> RikMills: loaklize still recommends python2 packages, blocking some NBS | |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | |
| [11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wpa (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.9-1ubuntu4 => 2:2.9-1ubuntu5] (core) | |
| [11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected wpa [source] (focal-proposed) [2:2.9-1ubuntu5] | |
| [11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wpa (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.9-1ubuntu4 => 2:2.9-1ubuntu5] (core) | |
| [11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: select2.js [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [4.0.13+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) | |
| [11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libproxy (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.15-10 => 0.4.15-10ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [11:48] <RikMills> doko: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lokalize/4:20.04.1-0ubuntu2 | |
| [11:50] <doko> ta | |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g_ | |
| [12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: urwid (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-3 => 2.1.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | |
| [12:35] <doko> Laney: can you have an extra dependency for an autopkg test, which is triggered by Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-python | |
| [12:36] <doko> or anybody else | |
| [12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected urwid [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-1ubuntu1] | |
| [12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (groovy-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu4] (core) | |
| [13:04] <coreycb> doko: hi, we had python-ironicclient in main at one point via bug 1376238. by any chance could we get python3-ironicclient into main for focal and above? | |
| [13:04] <ubot5> bug 1376238 in python-ironicclient (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-ironicclient" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1376238 | |
| [13:07] <Laney> doko: If you add a test with "Restrictions: hint-testsuite-triggers" and the extra depends in "Depends:" of that test, it should do what you want (I think, test it in bileto or something) | |
| [14:01] <doko> Laney: in debian/control ? the package doesn't have a separate test | |
| [14:17] <Laney> in debian/tests/control | |
| [14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-clocks (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 3.36.0-1ubuntu0.2] (desktop-extra) | |
| [14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.40.19-0ubuntu1 => 0.40.23-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | |
| [14:49] <seb128> rbasak, ^ could you review that gnome-clocks SRU? it's a trivial no change upload to rebuild with a fixed toolchain and fix a regression from the previous SRU (which sadly already moved to -updates so would be nice to get the regression fix going) | |
| [14:50] <rbasak> Looking | |
| [14:50] <rbasak> seb128: broken bug reference? | |
| [14:51] <doko> xnox: could you have a look at https://launchpadlibrarian.net/477651652/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-amd64.vcmi_0.99+dfsg+git20190113.f06c8a87-1build2_BUILDING.txt.gz boost 1.71 issue | |
| [14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-clocks (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 3.36.0-1ubuntu0.2] (desktop-extra) | |
| [14:51] <seb128> rbasak, good eyes! thanks, ^ | |
| [14:58] <zesty> "pkexec do-release-upgrade -d -m desktop -f DistUpgradeViewKDE" gives me a front door message that says "This release is still in development. Do not install it on production machines." Just an oversight? | |
| [15:00] <vorlon> Laney: testing-ports> heh | |
| [15:00] <zesty> without the "-d" option I get "There is no development version of an LTS available." | |
| [15:00] <zesty> So... mostly released? | |
| [15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adwaita-icon-theme (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.1-2ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 3.36.1-2ubuntu0.20.04.2] (core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [15:04] <xnox> doko: looks very odd indeed. | |
| [15:18] <doko> bdmurray: apport should b-d on pyflakes3, not pyflakes. could you change that? | |
| [15:19] <bdmurray> doko: yes | |
| [15:22] <doko> bdmurray: are you calling pyflakes3 as well? | |
| [15:23] <bdmurray> doko: yes | |
| [15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-clocks [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-1ubuntu0.2] | |
| [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-clocks [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-1ubuntu0.2] | |
| [15:31] <rbasak> seb128: ^ sorry for the delay. I had interrupts and am still unwinding my stack. | |
| [15:32] <rbasak> I was going to add a vala Focal task but I think a Launchpad bug is stopping me from doing that. | |
| [15:32] <rbasak> (presumably it is Fix Released though) | |
| [15:56] <vorlon> doko, bdmurray: oops I already uploaded that change | |
| [15:56] <vorlon> and NBS-cleaned up pyflakes | |
| [16:00] <bdmurray> okay | |
| [16:01] <bdmurray> vorlon: shouldn't these tzdata updates go to -security? | |
| [16:09] <tumbleweed> Laney: filed a bug for the autodep8 R thing: https://bugs.debian.org/961138 | |
| [16:09] <ubot5> Debian bug 961138 in autodep8 "autodep8 uses host APT packages to generate dependencies for pkg-r-autopkgtest tests" [Normal,Open] | |
| [16:16] <Laney> nice one | |
| [16:24] <seb128> rbasak, it's fix release in g for vala yes, and fix commit in focal (SRU in proposed) | |
| [16:25] <seb128> rbasak, and thanks for the reviews! | |
| [16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: biosig4c++ [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.5-1] (no packageset) | |
| [16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: biosig4c++ [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.5-1] (no packageset) | |
| [16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: biosig4c++ [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.5-1] (no packageset) | |
| [16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: biosig4c++ [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.5-1] (no packageset) | |
| [16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: biosig4c++ [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.5-1] (no packageset) | |
| [16:32] <vorlon> bdmurray: well security SRUs are supposed to be built in the security pocket, which these haven't been | |
| [16:32] <vorlon> bdmurray: maybe that's ok because they're data-only, but we'd need the security team to ack | |
| [16:37] <bdmurray> vorlon: how can we get that ack? | |
| [16:37] <vorlon> sbeattie: ^^ do you want to ack this? :) | |
| [16:38] <sbeattie> one sec, let me look | |
| [16:40] <vorlon> "Due to the potentially disastrous consequences of having localtime differ between systems running -updates and systems running only -security, this package is always kept in sync between the two pockets." https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates but it doesn't mention whether the package needs to be built in -security | |
| [16:42] <bdmurray> this built w/ updates afaict https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2019c-0ubuntu0.18.04/+build/17837399 | |
| [16:43] <sbeattie> I acked on LP: #1878108 | |
| [16:43] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1878108 in tzdata (Ubuntu Trusty) "new upstream release 2020a" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1878108 | |
| [16:43] <bdmurray> sbeattie: what should the process be going forward? | |
| [16:45] <Eickmeyer> rbasak: I have an SRU in bug 1877806, I just wanted to gauge your thoughts on it. | |
| [16:45] <ubot5> bug 1877806 in ardour (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] ardour crashes when saving lv2 plugin preset - bug discovered in lilv" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1877806 | |
| [16:48] <sbeattie> bdmurray: as long as tzdata retains the status of being data-only plus one shell script, I think going forward it is fine to build in -proposed. | |
| [16:48] <rbasak> Eickmeyer: sorry, I won't have time today - about to finish. | |
| [16:48] <Eickmeyer> rbasak: Ok, thanks. | |
| [16:48] <bdmurray> sbeattie: okay, should we get security to review each one? | |
| [16:49] <sbeattie> bdmurray: yeah, let's do that, and if it interferes with the ability to get timely tzdata updates landed, we can revisit. | |
| [16:50] <bdmurray> sbeattie: the review could happen before the verification is done / when it ends up in -proposed | |
| [16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.2] | |
| [16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tmux (focal-proposed/main) [3.0a-2 => 3.0a-2ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server) | |
| [16:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tmux [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0a-2ubuntu0.1] | |
| [17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: biosig4c++ [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.5-1] (no packageset) | |
| [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added lilv to ubuntustudio in bionic | |
| [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added lilv to ubuntustudio in eoan | |
| [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added lilv to ubuntustudio in focal | |
| [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added lilv to ubuntustudio in groovy | |
| [17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-matrix-nio [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.11.2-2] (no packageset) | |
| [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lilv (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.6-1 => 0.24.8~dfsg0-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, ubuntustudio) | |
| [17:33] <Eickmeyer> Can I get a reject on lilv above? It has a dependency issue I need to resolve. Sorry about the mess! | |
| [17:37] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: ^ ? | |
| [17:53] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: rejected | |
| [17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lilv [source] (focal-proposed) [0.24.8~dfsg0-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] | |
| [18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig4c++ [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-1] | |
| [18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig4c++ [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-1] | |
| [18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig4c++ [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-1] | |
| [18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libclamunrar [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.102.3-2] | |
| [18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-matrix-nio [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.11.2-2] | |
| [18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig4c++ [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-1] | |
| [18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig4c++ [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-1] | |
| [18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted select2.js [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.13+dfsg1-2] | |
| [18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig4c++ [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.5-1] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-masakariclient [source] (groovy-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted umis [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.7-1] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted umis [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.7-1] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted umis [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.7-1] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted umis [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.7-1] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted umis [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.7-1] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libclamunrar [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.102.3-1] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted notcurses [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2.3+dfsg.1-1] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted notcurses [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2.3+dfsg.1-1] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted purify [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.0-5] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted purify [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.0-5] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted purify [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.0-5] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (groovy-proposed) [1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] | |
| [18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted notcurses [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2.3+dfsg.1-1] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted notcurses [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2.3+dfsg.1-1] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted purify [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.0-5] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted notcurses [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2.3+dfsg.1-1] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted purify [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.0.0-5] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apertium-cat-ita [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.2.1-2] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yara [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.1-1] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yara [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.1-1] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yara [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.1-1] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yara [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.1-1] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yara [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.1-1] | |
| [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yara [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.1-1] | |
| [18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-masakariclient [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | |
| [18:10] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: ta | |
| [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-masakariclient [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1] | |
| [18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: live-build (focal-proposed/main) [3.0~a57-1ubuntu38 => 3.0~a57-1ubuntu38.20.04.1] (desktop-core) | |
| [18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lilv (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.6-1 => 0.24.6-1ubuntu0.3] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, ubuntustudio) | |
| [18:54] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Sorry to bug you again, but could you reject lilv again? I meant to put that in a PPA first. | |
| [18:59] <Eickmeyer> It builds, but I have yet to test and the versioning is wrong. | |
| [19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.2] | |
| [19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aptdaemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu32.1] | |
| [19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aptdaemon [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu28.2] | |
| [19:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aptdaemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu19.3] | |
| [19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aptdaemon [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu14.3] | |
| [19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lilv [source] (focal-proposed) [0.24.6-1ubuntu0.3] | |
| [19:22] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: ta | |
| [19:42] <mwhudson> ubuntu-archive: is it ok to "SRU" a rustc to focal that won't build on riscv? | |
| [19:43] <jdstrand> hey, fyi, the pulseaudio in groovy-proposed isn't migrating cause of a testsuite failure 'FAIL: volume-test'. I did the upload to address a CVE amd didn't touch this area of the code | |
| [19:43] <jdstrand> err, testsuite failure on *riscv64* only | |
| [19:45] <jdstrand> all the other archs pass. this also bundles a fix from the desktop team from ubuntu4, but it wasn't built on riscv64 there | |
| [19:46] <jdstrand> I'm not really in a position to fix this arch-specific issue atm. is this a candidate to be forced? | |
| [19:47] * jdstrand notes pulseaudio ftbfs on focal | |
| [19:47] <jdstrand> (again, for riscv64) | |
| [19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pantalaimon [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-2] (no packageset) | |
| [19:52] <vorlon> mwhudson: is that going to cause the rustc package itself to be out of date on riscv64? will it cause regressions in installability? | |
| [19:53] <mwhudson> vorlon: yes to the former, don't think so to the latter | |
| [19:53] <mwhudson> i guess it means that there will be a librust-std1.41 or whatever it's called on riscv still and librust-std1.42 on others | |
| [19:54] <vorlon> mwhudson: ok. as long as it doesn't increase uninstallabilities, I'd consider it acceptable | |
| [19:54] <mwhudson> vorlon: is there an easy way to check that? | |
| [19:55] <vorlon> mwhudson: well we should probably use britney to do that | |
| [19:56] <mwhudson> vorlon: ah well we can almost do that now https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/groovy/update_excuses.html#rustc | |
| [19:57] <mwhudson> vorlon: how do we get britney to ignore the missing build? | |
| [19:57] <vorlon> mwhudson: yeah except that's to the release pocket vs updates; there are britney instances for SRUs, so I'd say upload it and we'll see | |
| [19:57] <mwhudson> i know removing the old binaries is one way | |
| [19:57] <vorlon> I don't think we do want to ignore the missing build for devel | |
| [19:57] <mwhudson> ok | |
| [20:12] <mwhudson> vorlon: ok i've uploaded to focal unapproved | |
| [20:13] <mwhudson> vorlon: this needs to get to the security pocket eventually but i guess that can be done via another upload? | |
| [20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rustc (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2 => 1.42.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu2~20.04.1] (i386-whitelist) | |
| [20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lilv (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.6-1 => 0.24.6-1ubuntu0.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, ubuntustudio) | |
| [20:26] <Eickmeyer> Ok, ^ that one is for real for SRU bug 1877806 | |
| [20:26] <ubot5> bug 1877806 in ardour (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] ardour crashes when saving lv2 plugin preset - bug discovered in lilv" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1877806 | |
| [20:54] <RikMills> vorlon: it seems that nmapsi4 in proposed switched to build depending on QtWebEngine, so is now not buildable on ppc4el/s390x/riscv64. Could you remove the release pocket binaries for those? | |
| [21:05] <vorlon> RikMills: forensics-all-gui needs fixed first to not depend on it | |
| [21:05] <vorlon> RikMills: oh wait, that's arch: all - nevermind | |
| [21:05] <vorlon> RikMills: removed | |
| [21:05] <RikMills> vorlon: thanks! | |
| [21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1.22.10-1ubuntu2 => 1.22.10-1ubuntu2.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [21:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected wpa [source] (focal-proposed) [2:2.9-1ubuntu5] | |
| [21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wpa (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.9-1ubuntu4 => 2:2.9-1ubuntu5] (core) | |
| [21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: djvulibre (bionic-proposed/main) [3.5.27.1-8ubuntu0.1 => 3.5.27.1-8ubuntu0.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | |
| [23:29] <vorlon> wgrant: any idea why util-linux's setarch --uname-2.6 test would have regressed on riscv64? it's not a new test | |
| [23:34] <wgrant> vorlon: that was failing early on last year, due to an assumption about iirc stack layout that was fixed upstream. I carried a patch in my out-of-archive port for a while, but then one update it started building fine so I assumed the upstream fix had made it downstream. I have notes somewhere, will find in a bit. | |
| [23:37] <wgrant> vorlon: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/sys-utils/setarch.c?id=33e87bf1524baa215413cbcb26668e600a7b5cb8 was the fix in question | |
| [23:37] <wgrant> not sure if it's the same issue | |
| [23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmod [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmod [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmod [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmod [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmod [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmod [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] | |
| [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmod [i386] (groovy-proposed) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] | |
| [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmod [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] | |
| [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmod [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] | |
| [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmod [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmod [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [27+20200310-2ubuntu1] | |