| [06:25] <jam> morning all | |
| [06:35] <MarkMaglana> morning jam ! | |
| [08:42] * Chipaca pokes the internal irc | |
| [08:42] * Chipaca presents footage of said event: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMJXvsCLu6s | |
| [08:45] <jam> morning Chipaca | |
| [08:48] <Chipaca> jam: how's things? | |
| [08:58] <jam> going alright here. | |
| [08:58] <jam> Chipaca, they just called to tell me my coffee machine should be fixed by tomorrow, whi | |
| [08:58] <jam> which is pretty good news. | |
| [08:58] <jam> Though the repair cost is ~ the same as an aeropress :) | |
| [09:00] <Chipaca> I'm probably going to jinx it, but my aeropress is 6+ years old and still working just fine :) | |
| [09:53] <Chipaca> niemeyer: hiya! two questions about 'ops.lib.use': one is if you have a strong preference for LIB vs LIB_. The other is whether API/PATCH are the right names for what semantic versioning (which we encourage) is calling MAJOR and MINOR | |
| [09:54] <Chipaca> patch in particular seems strange as it's the name of the third element (the z in x.y.z) | |
| [09:54] * Chipaca is not blocked by these questions and goes back to writing tests | |
| [09:57] <niemeyer> Chipaca: major and minor mean nothing to most people.. API and patch versions has a stronger semantic | |
| [09:59] <niemeyer> Chipaca: My preference is obviously for the existing names otherwise I'd not have used them, but it's certainly subjective | |
| [09:59] <niemeyer> (in terms of the underline, that is) | |
| [10:01] <Chipaca> niemeyer: ok | |
| [10:01] <Chipaca> niemeyer: sometimes it feels like it's too mashed together without the _, but sometimes it's fine | |
| [10:01] <Chipaca> it's *very* subjective :) | |
| [10:02] <niemeyer> These names will be always seem next to each other.. | |
| [10:02] <niemeyer> Just type them out and look at them for a moment | |
| [10:02] <Chipaca> niemeyer: yeah, i think they feel weird when writing the tests, but not too weird in the init file itself, which is probably the right way around for weird | |
| [10:03] <niemeyer> Looked better without, since the whole prefix is mostly noise in that case.. but I won't argue too much in either direction :) | |
| [10:41] <Chipaca> niemeyer: another q: what about API or PATCH being 0? | |
| [10:41] <Chipaca> that's ok, right? | |
| [10:44] <niemeyer> Chipaca: Yeah, sounds fine | |
| [11:12] <facubatista> Muy buenos días a todos! | |
| [11:27] <jam> morning facubatista | |
| [11:27] <facubatista> hola jam | |
| [13:21] <Chipaca> jam: we should add a test for dispatch + independent action | |
| [13:23] <jam> Chipaca, indeed. Though it should follow the same logic as the hooks/ independent script (AFAICT) | |
| [13:25] <vgrevtsev> hi team, a quick q: do we have a way to alter the "Ports" in the `juju status` output after the charm is deployed? | |
| [13:28] <jam> vgrevtsev, that is generally populated from calling "open-port", IIRC | |
| [13:30] <vgrevtsev> I can't find any reference to the `open-port` in the framework code, so I'm wondering how it's getting done and how can I invoke it within the charm code | |
| [13:30] <vgrevtsev> I doubt that the `open-port` is available using the k8s charms.. at least I tried to run it inside the operator pod and got nothing | |
| [13:46] <Chipaca> vgrevtsev: https://github.com/canonical/operator/issues/179 | |
| [13:47] <Chipaca> so no surprise you don't find it yet :) | |
| [13:47] <Chipaca> i don't know about the k8s side of your question though | |
| [13:48] <vgrevtsev> Ok, so at least something! ;D | |
| [13:50] * facubatista brb | |
| [18:29] <facubatista> jam, which is the minimum set we need? (as the OF itself adds other hooks, right?) | |
| [18:49] <jam> So a minimum to be forward and backward compatible is probably dispatch + start + upgrade-charm | |
| [18:49] <jam> I think those are all the entry points that you could hit | |
| [19:23] <facubatista> jam, no "install"? | |
| [20:01] <Chipaca> facubatista: yes, also install | |
| [20:01] <facubatista> I included it just in case | |
| [20:02] <Chipaca> :) | |
| [20:03] <facubatista> So, First version of the build command: https://github.com/canonical/charmcraft/pull/4 | |
| [20:03] <facubatista> and with that, /me eods | |
| [20:04] <Chipaca> facubatista: huzzah | |
| [20:05] <Chipaca> facubatista: have a good'un! | |