|
[00:00] <wallyworld> hpidcock: yeah, should be a const, i can abort the merge if tlm wants to fix |
|
[00:00] <hpidcock> nah all good |
|
[00:01] <wallyworld> can be drive by nxext time |
|
[00:01] <hpidcock> yep |
|
[00:31] <wallyworld> hpidcock: FYI pr landed, release doc started, https://docs.google.com/document/d/13OZtXkx_0lfa3a6W6xRYqlY9p3MQT0KLtFRU49acXhM/ |
|
[00:38] <hpidcock> wallyworld: awesome! |
|
[00:40] <wallyworld> hpidcock: or thumper: here's 2.8-rc into 2.8 https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11600 clean merge |
|
[00:41] <hpidcock> wallyworld: any merges? |
|
[00:41] <hpidcock> merge conflicts* |
|
[00:41] <hpidcock> oh |
|
[00:41] <wallyworld> np :-) |
|
[00:41] <hpidcock> you already said clean merge |
|
[00:41] <wallyworld> yeah |
|
[00:42] <hpidcock> approved |
|
[00:42] <wallyworld> ta |
|
[00:42] <hpidcock> wallyworld: I'm going to start the release |
|
[00:42] <wallyworld> ok, sgtm |
|
[00:44] <wallyworld> hpidcock: maybe wait for buildjuju to finish to reduce load on slaves? |
|
[00:45] <hpidcock> wallyworld: yeah, just killed the old ci-runs |
|
[00:45] <hpidcock> waiting for this one to at least pass build |
|
[00:45] <wallyworld> +1 |
|
[00:49] <tlm> tiny pr if anyone has a few minutes https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11601 |
|
[00:52] <wallyworld> tlm: thre's also uniter.go |
|
[00:52] <tlm> ? |
|
[00:52] <wallyworld> same pattern |
|
[00:53] <wallyworld> if we fix in caasoperator should also fix in uniter.go as well |
|
[00:53] <wallyworld> original code was from 2015 |
|
[00:53] <tlm> ah ok makes sense |
|
[00:53] <wallyworld> i wonder if we needed the mutex back then |
|
[00:53] <tlm> thought I had missed a use case |
|
[00:53] <tlm> I was thinking the func was called multiple times but not the case |
|
[00:53] <wallyworld> no |
|
[00:55] <wallyworld> tlm: here's the commit message |
|
[00:55] <wallyworld> I believe that [this recent ppc64 failure](http://reports.vapour.ws/releases/3059/job/run-unit-tests-trusty-ppc64el/attempt/3804#highlight), is caused by a race between the restartWatcher and watcher cleanup closures. |
|
[00:55] <wallyworld> we should look to be sure we're not reintroducing a test issue |
|
[00:56] <tlm> that for me? Also link doesn't work |
|
[00:56] <wallyworld> no link won't work, it's an old CI server |
|
[00:56] <tlm> ah cool |
|
[00:56] <wallyworld> i just wanted to point out the commit message and why the mutex was added |
|
[00:57] <tlm> ah ok, mutex isn't doing anything now besides adding some noops |
|
[00:57] <wallyworld> we should think about if removing it would reintroduce any test failures |
|
[00:57] <wallyworld> yeah, it does appear to be redundant |
|
[00:58] <tlm> if we get test failures out of that then It would be a miracle that it has been working for so long. |
|
[00:58] <wallyworld> tlm: ah, the addCleanup() had the mutexes |
|
[00:59] <wallyworld> and they have been removed |
|
[00:59] <wallyworld> for some reason |
|
[00:59] <tlm> ah k |
|
[00:59] <wallyworld> this line u.addCleanup(func() error |
|
[01:00] <wallyworld> but it's not there anymore |
|
[01:00] <tlm> updated pr |
|
[01:00] <tlm> hey my first uniter change wallyworld. I have battle scars now :) |
|
[01:01] <wallyworld> lol |
|
[01:01] <wallyworld> tlm: i think we changes how stuff is shutdown since 2015 so mutex is now not not needed |
|
[01:01] <tlm> yep |
|
[01:02] <wallyworld> lgtm |
|
[01:02] <tlm> made juju 0.000005% faster |
|
[01:05] <wallyworld> progress |
|
[01:06] <timClicks> "what's new in juju 2.8" should now be feature complete https://discourse.juju.is/t/whats-new-in-juju-2-8/2859 |
|
[01:08] <wallyworld> awesome ty |
|
[01:09] <wallyworld> timClicks: the vsphere section should mention the new credential folder attribute? |
|
[01:10] <timClicks> actually just noticed that the new/changed hooks section is also quite sparse |
|
[01:13] <wallyworld> timClicks: min-juu-version isn't new, it's been there since 1.24 i think. What is new is that a charm says "2.8.0" to signal it doesn't need a k8s PV created for it since it (the charm) has been updated to use the new controller storage facility |
|
[01:47] <thumper> why do we have a package level variable for the watcher in the first place? |
|
[02:01] <hpidcock> thumper? |
|
[02:19] <thumper> hpidcock: from this https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11601 |
|
[02:19] <thumper> the lock was removed, but next to it was a package level watcher |
|
[02:19] <thumper> which seems wrong to me |
|
[02:20] <hpidcock> they are function variables |
|
[02:23] * thumper looks again |
|
[02:23] * thumper sighs |
|
[02:23] <thumper> I should have expanded the diff |
|
[02:23] <thumper> sorry for the noise |
|
[02:24] <thumper> https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11602 for a boring review |
|
[02:28] <tlm> i an do it |
|
[02:30] <babbageclunk> tlm: I'm looking |
|
[02:31] <tlm> ah cheers babbageclunk, my only feed back thus far and it may be there is that logger should be an interface type like the pattern in new workers |
|
[02:31] <babbageclunk> (I should have said I was) |
|
[02:31] <babbageclunk> it is one isn't it? |
|
[02:32] <tlm> maybe, I hadn't got that far yet |
|
[02:32] <tlm> as in type Logger interface { DebugF() } |
|
[02:32] <babbageclunk> yup yup |
|
[02:33] <babbageclunk> I can't remember why we started doing that though - was it just for ease of testing? |
|
[02:33] <tlm> Yeah make duck typing in testing easier |
|
[02:33] <tlm> makes* |
|
[02:34] <babbageclunk> I have a vague memory of there being something else as well but I can't think what it is. |
|
[02:35] <tlm> maybe for regex testing log messages in tests ? |
|
[02:36] <babbageclunk> thumper: approved |
|
[02:38] <wallyworld> thumper: last one for today, also clean merge https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11604 |
|
[03:57] <wallyworld> hpidcock: since thumper is ignoring me, perhaps you can +1 2.8->develop, similar to 2.8-rc->2.8 https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11604; clean merge, no accidental version updates |
|
[04:01] <hpidcock> wallyworld: ok looking |
|
[04:03] <hpidcock> wallyworld: approved |
|
[04:03] <wallyworld> tyvm |
|
[04:07] * thumper sighs |
|
[04:07] <thumper> I need to get these alerts sorted |
|
[04:07] <thumper> wallyworld: sorry |
|
[04:08] <wallyworld> thumper: no worries, i'm not really mad, just trolling you :-) |
|
[04:25] <hpidcock> wallyworld: is there a fast way to mark all bugs in a release as released? |
|
[04:25] <hpidcock> in a milestone* |
|
[04:27] <wallyworld> only using the python clp client |
|
[04:27] <wallyworld> IIANM |
|
[04:27] <wallyworld> *lp, not clp |
|
[05:57] * thumper knocks off a few more todos for the merging of agents |
|
[05:57] * thumper EODs |
|
[05:57] <thumper> see ya tomorrow folks |
|
[05:57] <thumper> wallyworld: could I get you to do a pass over the latest stop the line tests? |
|
[05:58] <thumper> just to see why they are failing, and email crew? |
|
[05:58] <thumper> especially given RC2 |
|
[05:58] <wallyworld> ok |
|
[05:58] <thumper> ta |
|
[08:03] <stickupkid> manadart, ping when you get a chance... |
|
[08:07] <manadart> stickupkid: Pong. |
|
[08:07] <stickupkid> daily? |
|
[09:47] <manadart> stickupkid: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11606 |
|
[10:24] <stickupkid> manadart, if MapWithSpaceNames passes in a lookup, but lookup is nil, should we return nil or the underlying bindings? |
|
[10:24] <stickupkid> manadart, I suspect we should return nil, but that gives you nothing |
|
[10:31] <manadart> stickupkid: If the lookup is length zero, we do what it does now and retrieve the spaces from state. |
|
[10:31] <stickupkid> manadart, why? |
|
[10:32] <stickupkid> manadart, why not push the logic out as a dependency? |
|
[10:33] <stickupkid> manadart, just make it implicit that we now require the network.SpaceInfos to get you MapWithSpaceNames... |
|
[10:33] <stickupkid> it's less magicial |
|
[10:33] <manadart> stickupkid: I guess it's doable. Not many call sites. |
|
[10:33] <stickupkid> manadart, that's my thought atm |
|
[10:34] <stickupkid> manadart, anything magical I'm tending to run away from atm |
|
[10:34] <manadart> stickupkid: In that case, a length zero lookup returns a `errors.NotValidf("empty space lookup")`. |
|
[10:34] <stickupkid> wicked, like it |
|
[12:19] <manadart> stickupkid: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11607 |
|
[12:44] <rick_h> stickupkid: if I deploy a bundle with pylibjuju with a CMR am I asking for trouble? |
|
[12:45] <rick_h> stickupkid: on the consuming side |
|
[12:50] <stickupkid> rick_h, probably |
|
[12:51] <stickupkid> rick_h, let me check if we implemented all the lookups |
|
[12:51] <rick_h> booooooooo |
|
[12:53] <stickupkid> rick_h, it depends, we handle consuming of offers, but we might not handle everything. |
|
[12:53] <rick_h> stickupkid: ok, guess I'll see how far I get ty |
|
[12:53] <stickupkid> rick_h, indeed |
|
=== verterok` is now known as verterok |
|
[14:11] <achilleasa> what can possibly go wrong here? https://github.com/juju/juju/blob/develop/network/network.go#L233-L252 |
|
[14:11] <achilleasa> (hint: look at the map access patterns) |
|
[14:18] <stickupkid> achilleasa, I don't like the fact it modifies the original map, creeps me out |
|
[14:18] <achilleasa> stickupkid: if you run out of space in the map, a new backing store will be allocated and the _reference_ passed to the func gets modified. However, the caller still has the old map ;-) |
|
[14:19] <stickupkid> achilleasa, also why doesn't gatherBridgeAddresses return []net.Addr |
|
[14:19] <stickupkid> achilleasa, hence the creeps me out |
|
[14:19] <stickupkid> achilleasa, addressesToRemove[DefaultLXDBridge] = gatherBridgeAddresses(DefaultLXDBridge) |
|
[14:19] <stickupkid> done |
|
[14:20] * stickupkid goes to check that he didn't write it |
|
[14:20] <stickupkid> haha |
|
[14:20] <achilleasa> nah, I will just throw all into a list and pass it to the filter func |
|
[14:20] <stickupkid> fair |
|
[14:20] <achilleasa> there might be some dups but who cares |
|
[14:21] <stickupkid> solve that later :) |
|
[14:36] <achilleasa> stickupkid: you need the map after all because the map gets flattened into a []ipNetAndName slice |
|
[15:07] <rick_h> guild I updated guimaas with guidance to the snap and 2.7 FYI |
|
[15:07] <rick_h> if anyone hits issues let me know and I might ask to take over guimaas for a demo in the near future just a heads up |
|
[15:08] <stickupkid> rick_h, nice :) |
|
[15:14] <stickupkid> gr8, when we moved to go 14 we didn't update all the mocks - haha |
|
|