| === pieq_ is now known as pieq | |
| [07:50] <Esokrates> Did anybody here use apport-retrace recently in sandbox mode and it worked? | |
| [07:51] <Esokrates> bdmurray: could you have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/1866996 ? | |
| [07:51] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1866996 in Apport "Apport-retrace sandbox has multiple issues" [Undecided,New] | |
| [08:12] <tjaalton> juliank: hi, is the focal kernel i915 stable now for you? | |
| [08:13] <juliank> tjaalton: yes both 17 and 18 are stable | |
| [08:13] <juliank> I crashed it yesterday but that was me running out of memory :) | |
| [08:15] <tjaalton> cool, I'll close the bug then | |
| [08:51] <seb128> hum, is libc6/i386 known to have issues in focal(-proposed) | |
| [08:52] <seb128> some autopkgtest started failing with symbols errors, e.g https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/p/pulseaudio/20200312_060342_3f30a@/log.gz | |
| [08:52] <seb128> /usr/lib/gcc-cross/i686-linux-gnu/9/../../../../i686-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/librt.so.1: undefined reference to `__clock_nanosleep@GLIBC_PRIVATE' | |
| [08:52] <seb128> etc | |
| [08:52] <seb128> doko, xnox, juliank, ^ do you know? | |
| [08:54] <seb128> hum, also just did an upload and got an armhf failure from the builds | |
| [08:54] <juliank> there was omething about gcc is using private symbols and needs rebuilds | |
| [08:54] <seb128> E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the essential package libc6:armhf due to a Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop. | |
| [08:54] <juliank> this should be fixed soon | |
| [08:54] <juliank> (the E: error) | |
| [08:54] <seb128> k | |
| [08:55] <juliank> The gcc one I think was uploaded too | |
| [08:55] <seb128> the archive is not having a great week with the libc changes! | |
| [08:55] <juliank> yup | |
| [08:55] <seb128> also shouldn't disruptive changes like that go through a ffe before landing? | |
| [08:56] <seb128> the idea is that we should be focussing on bugfixing after ff... | |
| [08:56] <juliank> heh | |
| [08:56] <juliank> that would make sense | |
| [08:57] <juliank> but then it would not change anything, anyway | |
| [08:57] <doko> juliank, seb128: glibc mismatch for native and cross compilers, please retrigger with the glibc in -proposed | |
| [08:57] <seb128> doko, thanks | |
| [10:11] <seb128> doko, bdmurray, apport migrated without glibc so now the autopkgtest are failing unless retried with a trigger :-/ | |
| [12:09] <ahasenack> teward: hi, good morning. MIR team is ok with the nginx plan. Do we need a FFe for it do you think? | |
| [12:09] <ahasenack> given it will warrant a release notes entry, I'm inclined to think it does | |
| [12:10] <teward> yes it needs an FFe | |
| [12:11] <ahasenack> I don't think I can overload the same bug with it | |
| [12:11] <ahasenack> let me file a new one and do the paper work, you good with that? | |
| [12:11] <teward> yep, if Release Team acks it I'll upload it :) | |
| [12:13] <ahasenack> ok | |
| [12:30] <AsciiWolf> kenvandine, would it be possible to set a high priority on https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap-store/+bug/1866998 ? this is a quite serious issue that will lead to many users unintentionally uninstalling the Snap Store | |
| [12:30] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1866998 in snap-store "Snap Store snap can be uninstalled using Snap Store" [Undecided,New] | |
| [12:30] <AsciiWolf> thanks | |
| [12:41] <rafaeldtinoco> cpaelzer: quick question.. i had issues with kmod in ppa and not locally | |
| [12:41] <rafaeldtinoco> MY_DEB_BUILD_PROFILES="nocheck nodoc noudeb" | |
| [12:42] <rafaeldtinoco> having "noudeb" in the DEB_BUILD_PROFILES makes the build ok.. but ppa probably does not use that build profile | |
| [12:42] <rafaeldtinoco> you know what is special about kmod and the libkmod-udeb pkg ? | |
| [12:47] <ogra> sil2100, gentle poke about https://github.com/snapcore/pi-gadget/pull/33 ... | |
| [12:50] <kenvandine> AsciiWolf: thanks, i'll look into that | |
| [12:52] <cpaelzer> rafaeldtinoco: no I don't know its special bells and whistles :-/ | |
| [12:56] <rafaeldtinoco> yep, I wonder if its something the builders have and ppas dont | |
| [12:56] <rafaeldtinoco> xnox: would u know ? kmod pkg ^ | |
| [12:58] <xnox> one second, brb. | |
| [13:01] <xnox> rafaeldtinoco: what is your failure? | |
| [13:01] <rafaeldtinoco> xnox: https://launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/+archive/ubuntu/lp1864992/+build/18828616 | |
| [13:01] <rafaeldtinoco> it complains about udeb and a debian helper param | |
| [13:01] <rafaeldtinoco> dh_makeshlibs: The udeb libkmod2-udeb does not contain any shared libraries but --add-udeb=libkmod2-udeb was passed!? | |
| [13:02] <rafaeldtinoco> i have this locally as well if not using "noudeb" | |
| [13:03] <sil2100> ogra: eeek, ok, I'll try to look in a bit | |
| [13:03] <xnox> rafaeldtinoco: if you read the log, it does create two builds build-udeb & build-deb thus it must build a full-fat libkmod2-udeb and it must contain a shared library | |
| [13:04] <xnox> rafaeldtinoco: possibly some regression somewhere, i.e. changed paths or debhelper, thus something is not building/installing libkmod shared libraries from the build-udeb/* into debian/libkmod2-udeb/* | |
| [13:04] <rafaeldtinoco> yep that is what I was afraid | |
| [13:04] <xnox> rafaeldtinoco: and we still need the udeb | |
| [13:04] <rafaeldtinoco> ok.. ill verify it | |
| [13:05] <rafaeldtinoco> thanks! | |
| [13:05] <rafaeldtinoco> i wanted to discard something builders wise | |
| [13:06] <xnox> rafaeldtinoco: does 27 rebuild fine? it has this https://salsa.debian.org/md/kmod/-/commit/e5ab645e12ba8a23275d4a0e352febc7bea101ca | |
| [13:07] <rafaeldtinoco> havent tried, will do | |
| [13:32] <AsciiWolf> kenvandine, thanks! btw. there's another smaller issue that would be also good to fix and should be easy to fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap-store/+bug/1866997 - should be fixed by setting a packagekit_autoremove meson build option to true :) | |
| [13:32] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1866997 in snap-store "Snap Store does not uninstall unused dependencies when uninstalling a deb application" [Undecided,New] | |
| [13:39] <ahasenack> teward: hi, can you add your debdiff to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1867150 ? Or branch | |
| [13:39] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1867150 in nginx (Ubuntu) "FFe: nginx: demote bin:libnginx-mod-http-geoip" [Undecided,New] | |
| [13:40] <ahasenack> teward: I'll link to the pastebin from yesterday, but I think you updated it already | |
| [13:40] <ahasenack> ah, it's in the other bug? | |
| [13:40] * ahasenack checks | |
| [13:40] <ahasenack> yep | |
| [13:43] <bdmurray> seb128: Is there anything I can do to fix it? | |
| [13:44] <seb128> bdmurray, I've no idea, maybe the code could check what glibc version is in use and test one string or the other according? | |
| [13:44] <seb128> bdmurray, or maybe now it's done and we just need glibc to migrate to fix it... | |
| [14:09] <teward> ahasenack: yeah i already uploaded the debdiff to that first bug ;) | |
| [14:14] <ahasenack> teward: ok, I attached it to the ffe one as well | |
| [16:12] <cpaelzer> doko: (and FYI ahasenack) the postgresql-12 build issue is indeed llvm | |
| [16:12] <cpaelzer> a segfault | |
| [16:12] <cpaelzer> doko: the install log has a few details https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/3hKrfH3sJJ/ | |
| [16:12] <cpaelzer> eventually it crashes with | |
| [16:12] <cpaelzer> #0 0x000003ff7faab14a (/usr/lib/s390x-linux-gnu/libLLVM-10.so.1+0x9ab14a) | |
| [16:12] <cpaelzer> Segmentation fault | |
| [16:14] <cpaelzer> it is reproducible by re-issugin that looong command to /usr/lib/llvm-10/bin/llvm-lto | |
| [16:15] <cpaelzer> doko: I'll install dbgsyms and try to get you a backtrace | |
| [16:15] <cpaelzer> doko: can you look if that is any kind of known issue from there? | |
| [16:16] <xnox> cpaelzer: is there a bug report? we can escalate it to IBM llvm maintainers | |
| [16:17] <xnox> cpaelzer: is it reproducible if one builds with '-march=z13' set in all the build flags? | |
| [16:17] <xnox> cpaelzer: i wonder if you should build with llvm-9 for now, to get postgresql migrating, whilst this is investigated | |
| [16:18] <cpaelzer> xnox: PGsql is fine, this is triggered by the llvm-10 rebuild that dodko did | |
| [16:18] <xnox> ah, ok | |
| [16:18] <cpaelzer> I'm filing a bug with details right now | |
| [16:18] <cpaelzer> doko can then decide if he wants to pass that to IBM or anything else | |
| [16:21] <doko> xnox: that's already done | |
| [16:21] <doko> cpaelzer: yes, a stacktrace would be nice | |
| [16:22] <cpaelzer> hmm the stack tarce isn't super useful | |
| [16:22] <cpaelzer> do we have a gdb issue in focal or is llvm hard to debug? | |
| [16:22] <cpaelzer> Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'> PC not saved: | |
| [16:23] <cpaelzer> http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/8ffXqvmGWN/ | |
| [16:23] <cpaelzer> doko: ^^ this isn't enough to help you I guess right? | |
| [16:24] * cpaelzer installs more dbgsyms | |
| [16:25] <cpaelzer> ah better now | |
| [16:25] <cpaelzer> doko: xnox: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-10/+bug/1867173 has all the data including the backtrace | |
| [16:25] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1867173 in postgresql-12 (Ubuntu) "FTBFS with llvm-10" [Undecided,New] | |
| [16:25] <cpaelzer> doko: anything I should check immediately ? | |
| [16:30] <doko> cpaelzer: forwarded | |
| [16:36] <cpaelzer> doko: I attached a core file I saved with gdb | |
| [16:36] <cpaelzer> let me know if you ever need more on it | |
| [20:30] <mwhudson> xnox: have you looked at the casper bug yet? | |
| [20:40] <ahasenack> teward: hi, debian doesn't have this geoip2 module? | |
| [20:41] <teward> nope | |
| [20:41] <teward> debian doesn't have nginx-core either | |
| [20:41] <ahasenack> k | |
| [20:41] <ahasenack> I mean, the geoip2 .so isn't shipped in any other package, right? | |
| [20:42] <teward> the nginx geoip2 .so? nope. | |
| [20:42] <ahasenack> ok | |
| [21:14] <ahasenack> teward: mir on geoip2 filed | |
| [22:40] <Laney> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/468839824/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-s390x.gobject-introspection_1.64.0-1_BUILDING.txt.gz | |
| [22:40] <Laney> what does that mean | |
| [22:40] <Laney> :/ :/ :/ :\ :\ :\ | |
| [22:43] <sarnold> "The use of ‘#include_next’ can lead to great confusion" https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.5.0/cpp/Wrapper-Headers.html | |
| [22:53] <Laney> dunno right now how limits.h from glibc is meant to find the one from the compiler | |
| [22:53] <Laney> any hints welcome, will have to come back to this tomorrow | |