UbuntuIRC / 2020 /03 /11 /#ubuntu-devel.txt
niansa
Initial commit
4aa5fce
[01:57] * mwhudson pokes at glibc's build system, fails
=== ben_r_ is now known as ben_r
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq
[09:02] <cpaelzer> rbasak: any idea why "git ubuntu tag --upload" would complain about "ERROR:Working tree must be clean to continue." while "git status --ignored" is empty?
[09:03] <cpaelzer> ah, could it be that it has an empty dir issue?
[09:03] <cpaelzer> I just checked out my current branch and got the "WARNING: empty directories exist but are not tracked by git:" ...
[09:04] <cpaelzer> rbasak: by that the upload won't be matched anyway, would that also trigger the "must be clean" issue
[09:21] <rbasak> I'm not sure, sorry. That behaviour always seemed a little buggy to me.
[09:23] <cpaelzer> what confuses me is that it depends on the type of tag
[09:24] <cpaelzer> --split almost always works whiel --logical almost never works (for me)
[10:40] <rbasak> doko: would you mind reviewing bug 1864766 please? It looks like the right thing to do to me, but I'd appreciate your eyes.
[10:40] <ubottu> bug 1864766 in python-pip (Ubuntu Xenial) "[SRU] pip in xenial is installing packages incompatible with Python 2.7 (and those are becoming common)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1864766
[11:07] <heliocastro> Morning/afternoon
[11:09] <heliocastro> After update from eoan to focal, ina XPS 13, X11 simply stop to proper work:
[11:09] <heliocastro> Here's what is happening https://photos.app.goo.gl/MPv8Ef7BnUYA7VXb9
[11:09] <heliocastro> Right now i'm using wayland
[11:09] <heliocastro> Is there any report open against intel graphic drivers ?
=== bpsecret- is now known as bpsecret
[11:18] <AsciiWolf> hmm, the snap version of gnome-software on latest Ubuntu Focal does not uninstall unused dependencies when uninstalling a deb application?
[11:18] <AsciiWolf> or is there something wrong on my system?
[11:20] <AsciiWolf> also, I was able to uninstall the Snap Store snap itself from the Snap Store app... this should not be possible at all
[11:22] <AsciiWolf> I am not sure if I should report these as issues on Launchpad since they happen only in the snap version of gnome-software
[11:24] <AsciiWolf> oh and another small thing: the "Open in Software" button from Applications tab in GNOME Settings does nothing when there is only a Snap version of gnome-software installed
=== Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray
[12:03] <rbasak> AsciiWolf: https://snapcraft.io/snap-store says to use https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap-store/
[12:08] <AsciiWolf> rbasak, thanks!
[12:08] <kanashiro> hi, I am investigating the gem2deb/1.0.5 autopkgtest failure on armhf and it is complaining (reprotest actually) about the kernel version: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/armhf/g/gem2deb/20200311_020802_c6e4e@/log.gz
[12:09] <kanashiro> if you check the log you will find: autopkgtest [01:38:52]: testbed running kernel: Linux 4.15.0-72-generic #81-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 26 12:21:09 UTC 2019
[12:09] <kanashiro> is linux 4.15.0 expected in an ubuntu focal testbed?
[13:22] <ahasenack> vorlon: hi, for when you are online, when you have a moment, this is a seed change for a geoip library. I added a review slot for you at the request of the MIR team, because you were the one who added the geoip1 version to this seed way back: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/380547
[13:26] <ahasenack> teward: hi, I'm in the process of trying to bring libmaxminddb (for GeoIP2 access) from universe to main, and demote geoip1. There are only two rdeps in main, and nginx is one of them. I believe I just need to reshuffle the meta packages to require the geoip2 subpackage instead of the geoip1, and I'll put an MP up shortly and add a review slot for you
[13:52] <ahasenack> teward: when you are around, for the moment the diff is in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmaxminddb/+bug/1861101/comments/8 as I can't push to a new git repo in lp (it's being worked on)
[13:52] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1861101 in nginx (Ubuntu) "[MIR]: dependency of bind9" [Undecided,In progress]
[13:57] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: will your fix for bug 1866458 definitely also work on the release pocket Bionic kernel? Because we'll build with NLA_F_NESTED defined to non-zero, right?
[13:57] <ubottu> bug 1866458 in drbd-utils (Ubuntu Bionic) "drbd not working after kernel upgrade 5.0.x -> 5.3.x" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1866458
[13:58] <rafaeldtinoco> yep
[13:58] <rafaeldtinoco> without that flag set command rets error
[14:02] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: I don't follow
[14:02] <rbasak> I thought this worked without the fix on the original kernel?
[14:03] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: new kernels containing a specific commit need that fix
[14:03] <rafaeldtinoco> so if user is using HWE and upgrades to new kernel.. might have to have it
[14:04] <rafaeldtinoco> ah I see what you mean
[14:04] <rafaeldtinoco> sorry rbasak I was doing 3 simult things
[14:04] <rafaeldtinoco> you are afraid of the flag
[14:04] <rafaeldtinoco> being added to a kernel that does not need it
[14:04] <rafaeldtinoco> +#ifndef NLA_F_NESTED
[14:04] <rafaeldtinoco> +#define NLA_F_NESTED 0
[14:04] <rafaeldtinoco> +#endif
[14:05] <rafaeldtinoco> that part will make it ok
[14:06] <rafaeldtinoco> or maybe I didnt understand what u meant
[14:06] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: sort of
[14:06] <rbasak> And yes, that ifndef would nearly make me happy
[14:06] <rbasak> However that's a build time thing
[14:07] <rbasak> In our case, presumably NLA_F_NESTED is always available at build time and is non-zero
[14:08] <rafaeldtinoco> I see what u mean
[14:08] <rafaeldtinoco> i was checking that
[14:08] <rbasak> So how does something compiled with that work with an old kernel being given a flag value it doesn't recognize?
[14:08] <rafaeldtinoco> linux/netlink.h:#define NLA_F_NESTED (1 << 15)
[14:08] * rafaeldtinoco checks
[14:12] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/drbd-utils/+bug/1866458/comments/11
[14:12] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1866458 in drbd-utils (Ubuntu Bionic) "drbd not working after kernel upgrade 5.0.x -> 5.3.x" [Medium,In progress]
[14:13] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: thank you for checking!
[14:13] <rafaeldtinoco> of course. im sorry for not having checked it before
[14:14] <rafaeldtinoco> ill pay more attention to compile-time only variables being added
[14:14] <rbasak> It's fine. That's the point of reviews :)
[14:14] <rafaeldtinoco> yep
[14:14] <rafaeldtinoco> =)
=== Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray
[15:36] <seb128> vorlon, hey, could you get wpebackend-fdo to build on i386? it's a build-depends of webkit2gtk now
[15:39] <Laney> we need mozjs68 for gjs now as well
[15:42] <Laney> https://code.launchpad.net/~laney/ubuntu-archive-tools/mozjs68/+merge/380562
[15:49] <vorlon> seb128: wpebackend-fdo added to the whitelist. so webkit2gtk got uploaded while there was a version entangled in the icu transition, and there were autopkgtest failures on webkit2gtk's revdeps in particular that were blocking. are we going to get this through?
[15:50] <seb128> vorlon, I noticed those but I didn't want to investage on an rc version when a new stable is out which might fix it, I will look at those failure if there are still there with 2.28.0
[15:51] <vorlon> ok, as long as there's follow-through, thanks
[15:51] <seb128> np!
[15:59] <teward> ahasenack: NACK unless your rejiggered the NGINX code. the inbuilt GeoIP doesnt work with geoip2
[16:00] <teward> we had to pull in a third party plugin for it so unless libmaxmind is going to Main I have to disable some components on NGINX builds
[16:01] <teward> I have no issues doing that but that removes the geoip functions from nginx-core
[16:01] <teward> had this discussion with upstream when GeoIP Legacy went the way of the dinosaur and we pulled in geoip2 as another third party module
[16:02] <teward> ah wait I misread. bringing libmaxmind to main.
[16:02] <teward> error:deadbrain
[16:02] <teward> ahasenack: sec team needs to review geoip2 then
[16:03] <teward> because that's a third party module
[16:03] <teward> (the geoip2 in the package for nginx) - if Security OKs that third party module going to main then I can apply it
[16:03] <ahasenack> teward: you mean review nginx's geoip2 core, not libmaxminddb
[16:03] <teward> ahasenack: ehhhhhhhhhhhh
[16:03] <teward> no
[16:03] <ahasenack> is that a separate source tarball? Or a contrib/?
[16:04] <teward> hang on a moment IRC from phone is inefficient
[16:04] <teward> let me get to my PC
[16:04] <ahasenack> teward: I'm on a call too :)
[16:04] <ahasenack> teward: we can talk in 1h or later
[16:04] <teward> lol i"m not heh
[16:04] <cjwatson> FWIW I switched Launchpad to geoip2 in production a while back
[16:04] <teward> just not out of bed :)
[16:05] <cjwatson> (because geoip legacy is (a) legacy and (b) doesn't support ipv6)
[16:07] <teward> cjwatson: right, that's why i pushed to get geoip2 added to the package as a third party dep
[16:07] <teward> but here's the problem
[16:07] <teward> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1825895 is the inclusion of geoip2 module
[16:07] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1825895 in nginx (Ubuntu) "Please include GeoIP2 module." [Wishlist,Fix released]
[16:07] <teward> which is not from nginx.org upstream
[16:08] <teward> it's in debian/modules/
[16:08] <teward> which is where we load 3rd party modules (Debian's to blame here)
[16:08] <teward> now, we had a strict thing with nginx-core to not have any third party modules back in the nginx MIR
[16:08] <ahasenack> teward: I have to leave for about 1h, will be back later to read history
[16:08] <teward> geoip is from upstream, geoip2 is *not* from upstream nginx and is third party
[16:09] <teward> so if we're going to add that as a dep in nginx-core we need the SEcurity team to vet that module's code more thoroughly
[16:09] <teward> (cc sarnold because I'm about to give you more work_)
[16:09] <teward> now, if the Security team ACK's the geoip2 module that is third party for Main, then I can support this and push the diffs in
[16:09] <cjwatson> I presume this is only an issue due to the desire to only have one or the other of the core geoip{1,2} libraries in main
[16:10] <cjwatson> since I don't think nginx uses the python geoip bindings either way
[16:10] <cjwatson> anyway, not my problem, I just wanted to mention the Launchpad change
[16:13] <teward> cjwatson: the only reason it's an issue is because ahasenack wants to change nginx-core to pull in libnginx-mod-http-geoip2 instead of libnginx-mod-http-geoip
[16:13] <cjwatson> Presumably ultimately for the reason I gave
[16:13] <teward> ahasenack: this said, the two can work at the same time, they're designed to be coinstallable and work with slightly different commands
[16:13] <teward> yep
[16:13] <teward> cjwatson: yep.
[16:15] <teward> regardless, because of the nature of -geoip2 being a third party module that was NOT ACK'd in the original NGINX MIR (and was not given an ACK for main because libmaxminddb is not in Main) it needs a Security Team review of that code before it can be ACK'd and included in Main (the -geoip2 module).
[16:15] <teward> s/that code/the third party module's code/
[16:17] <teward> (it also required libmaxminddb0 to be installed at runtime so... hence why it couldn't be in Main directly)
[16:18] <teward> ahasenack: also, I would suggest that we keep -geoip in as well as -geoip2 because -geoip2 isn't AIUI reverse compatible with GeoLite or GeoIP1 which some older deployments may still be using.
[16:18] <teward> (because they target different geoip datasets and there's a LOT of legacy apps I can think of in the Universe that use the legacy geoip data)
[16:21] <teward> ah i just read the bug data. ACK for dropping -geoip as a dep in core IF security team ACKs -geoip2 for Main
[16:21] <teward> cpaelzer: ^ pulling you in since you pointed ahasenack my way
[16:22] <teward> cpaelzer: needs security team reivew of -geoip2 for Main inclusion before it can move anywhere
[16:22] <teward> (because -geoip2 is NOT from nginx upstream, it's a third party contrib.)
[16:22] <cjwatson> I feel like you've said this a lot and maybe it would be better to just write it down once in a bug or MP or whatever's appropriate?
[16:22] <teward> already made a note in the bug
[16:23] <teward> *yawn* now where the heck is my coffee...
[16:33] <vorlon> Laney: well, mozjs68 ftbfs on i386 :P
[16:33] <vorlon> Laney: (and on amd64 apparently)
[16:33] <Laney> WHAT
[16:33] <vorlon> all I did was a no-change rebuild to pick up i386
[16:34] <vorlon> so I dunno
[16:34] <Laney> dunno about amd64, no log?
[16:35] <Laney> i386... yeah... ok that looks plausibly real
[17:19] <ahasenack> teward: I commented in the bug also. What if we demoted the geoip(1) nginx module?
[17:21] <teward> ahasenack: doable. would require a few tweaks to the build rules too I believe because it references the dynamic modules there. give me a bit, doing some net maintenance at home atm so stuck on my phone's crap signal. Release Notes will need a blurb then though
[17:21] <ahasenack> sure
[17:22] <teward> so upgraders know the functionality changed
[17:22] <ahasenack> I added some reasons to my comment
[17:22] <ahasenack> which we could use to justify this
[17:22] <teward> *disappears to finish the net changes to bring wifi back up*
[17:22] <ahasenack> good luck!
[17:39] <teward> ahasenack: given the MIR backlog currently at the Sec Team's level (per sarnold) I'd say just drop geoip from core. I'll have to tweak the build rules give me a bit to poke some things and I'll have a debdiff
[17:39] <ahasenack> thanks teward. This also doesn't prevent the review of geoip2 from happening
[17:39] <teward> correct.
[17:40] <teward> but it removes NGINX from the equation
[17:40] <teward> for now
[17:40] <ahasenack> agreed
[17:40] <teward> we can MIR geoip2 in nginx later
[17:40] <ahasenack> if you want I can file that bug and start the analysis, like I did for bind9 (see the long description)
[17:41] <teward> yep, feel free, but let me get this diff first and let you once-over it to see if I missed stuff
[17:42] <ahasenack> right, let's see how it works
[17:42] <ahasenack> and if it works
[17:43] <sarnold> woo, thanks teward, ahasenack :)
[17:43] <ahasenack> teamwork++
[17:49] <teward> ahasenack: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/4q3Bv9Sy53/ <-- the debdiff I've got that would make these changes.
[17:49] <teward> there's an extra change in there for consistency sake on indentation from the 'dynamic module' section defining what is/isn't a dynamic module but the core_configure_flags in debian/rules is the core change that needed to be made
[17:49] <teward> otherwise it'd explode at compile :P
[17:50] * ahasenack doesn't like explosions outside of cinema
[17:51] <ahasenack> teward: I'll give that a whirl in a ppa together with the rest, and MP afterwards
[17:51] <ahasenack> unless you are doing that right now
[17:51] <teward> nah i need foods. feel free to do the PPA testing, if it works i can upload this direct :P
[17:51] <ahasenack> ok
[17:51] <ahasenack> thanks a lot
[18:47] <teward> wow LAG. my debdiff post JUST went throug bleh
[18:47] <teward> *shoots computer*
[18:55] <teward> ahasenack: i just uploaded the debdiff as well
[18:55] <teward> to the bug in case paste.u.c drops
[18:59] <ahasenack> teward: my only change is a whitespace at the and of the changelog message, and adding the bug number
[18:59] <teward> cool cook
[18:59] <ahasenack> + * Drop GeoIP from nginx-core due to demotion of libgeoip (LP: #1861101):
[18:59] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1861101 in nginx (Ubuntu) "[MIR]: dependency of bind9" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1861101
[18:59] <teward> cool cool*
[18:59] <ahasenack> it's building in a ppa
[19:00] <teward> awesome let me know how it goes
[19:00] <ahasenack> https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/bind9-geoip
[19:13] <teward> ahasenack: I'll run tests after it builds and publishes
[19:13] <ahasenack> it's published, I'm about to install it
[19:13] <ahasenack> tw^
[19:13] <ahasenack> teward: ^
[19:13] <teward> ok. i need to check some config bits tho on it too
[19:13] <teward> make sure its disabled too - because default it's off :P
[19:13] <teward> in a few once my Focal container starts
[19:17] <ahasenack> teward: note I enabled proposed in the ppa, to mimic what will happen once it's uploaded to focal
[19:17] <teward> awesome
[19:17] <ahasenack> there is a new libcrypt1 dep
[19:17] <ahasenack> you might have to enable proposed in your container as well
[19:17] <teward> (I already do heh)
[19:17] <ahasenack> yay
[19:18] <ahasenack> nginx-core : Depends: libcrypt1 (>= 1:4.1.0) but it is not installable
[19:18] <ahasenack> I didn't :P
[19:23] <ahasenack> I see it there, it has the so, linked to the expected libraries
[19:23] <ahasenack> teward: modules-available/ is empty after installs?
[19:23] <ahasenack> in /etc, I mean
[19:23] <teward> yes
[19:25] <teward> ahasenack: mine's enabled too but it won't install until i specify `-t focal-proposed` to apt :P
[19:25] <teward> installing now
[19:25] <ahasenack> safer
[19:26] <teward> (I pinned it at 400 per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed)
[19:26] <ahasenack> I always forget about -t
[19:27] <teward> ahasenack: modules-enabled is where the system installed ones are
[19:28] <teward> geoip isn't in there which is a good sign
[19:28] <teward> but let me do some tests
[19:29] <teward> nginx: [emerg] unknown directive "geoip_country" in /etc/nginx/conf.d/geoip.conf:1 <-- this is *good*
[19:29] <teward> means geoip isn't available which is what our proposal does to nginx-core - removes 'geoip' from the available command set
[19:29] <teward> so from my perspective LGTM with those changes in, as geoip isn't available
[19:30] <teward> that said, we'll start getting [emerg] level log warnings for people still using legacy GeoIP in nginx-core and upgrading
[19:30] <teward> but that's something we'll have to justify
[19:33] <ahasenack> is this something that prevents nginx from starting after an upgrade?
[19:33] <ahasenack> I guess no, because we are not removing the geoip package
[19:33] <ahasenack> it will just be upgraded as usual, but from universe
[19:33] <ahasenack> this was a fresh install case?
[19:35] <teward> yes
[19:35] <teward> but the upgrade case will cause errors as well
[19:35] <ahasenack> how so?
[19:35] <ahasenack> if someone doesn't have universe enabled, you mean?
[19:35] <teward> well if the upgrade process does an autoremove it'll remove the geoip module
[19:36] <teward> and its modules-enabled reference
[19:36] <teward> and restart nginx and get an 'unknown directive' error
[19:36] <teward> this'll require a release notes notice about it
[19:36] <ahasenack> will it fail to restart?
[19:36] <teward> yes
[19:36] <ahasenack> I think it prompts for autoremove
[19:36] <ahasenack> but still, if there are many packages in that list, it might be missed
[19:36] <teward> yep
[19:37] <teward> if it autoremoves libnginx-mod-http-geoip it'll error with the error I indicated
[19:37] <ahasenack> replacing geoip with geoip2 would have caused the same thing, no?
[19:37] <teward> correct
[19:37] <teward> because it's a separate set of config arguments
[19:38] <teward> this is ExpectedIssues with any major change like this
[19:38] <ahasenack> I mean, even the original plan would have caused this
[19:38] <teward> correct
[19:38] <ahasenack> ok, document and proceed. I'll add a release notes task to the bug
[19:38] <ahasenack> if I remember what the release notes project is
[19:38] <teward> heh
[19:40] <teward> ahasenack: i'll tweak my debdiff, do you want me to upload direct to proposed then?
[19:40] <ahasenack> teward: that /etc/nginx/conf.d/geoip.conf you had, was that you who created it, or the package?
[19:41] <teward> i created it
[19:41] <ahasenack> ok
[19:41] <teward> no package makes anything in conf.d
[19:41] <ahasenack> so even purging would leave it there, and the error
[19:41] <teward> but it beats the heck out of editing nginx.conf directly (it has an `include /etc/nginx/conf.d/*.conf`)
[19:41] <teward> correct, which is another example of how this upgrade can break things
[19:41] <ahasenack> yeah, isn't that one of the reasons to have .d? To have packages place stuff there?
[19:41] <teward> ahasenack: indeed, but nginx doesn't enable geoip by default
[19:41] <teward> upstream indicates as much
[19:42] <ahasenack> but if you install it, it loads it by default
[19:42] <teward> http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_geoip_module.html
[19:42] <ahasenack> just not uses it?
[19:42] <teward> correct
[19:42] <teward> but loads vs. uses is the point here
[19:42] <ahasenack> ok, several layers
[19:42] <teward> the module is default off unless you configure things
[19:42] <teward> once you add the configuration (a-la that link's example at the top of its docs) it tries to use the module
[19:42] <teward> by 'default off' i mean enabled anda vailable but not used.
[19:42] <teward> s/enabled/loaded/
[19:43] <teward> just like a2enmod {INSERTMODULE} that doesn't necessarily *activate* any configurations for some modules just makes it available for conf to use.
[19:43] <teward> (in some edge cases)
[19:43] <ahasenack> ok
[19:44] <ahasenack> I added a comment about release notes
[19:44] <ahasenack> wrt uploading now, I don't know, cpaelzer isn't aware of our new plan
[19:44] <ahasenack> maybe wait until tomorrow?
[19:44] <teward> ack
[19:44] <teward> i'll prep the changes on my side though
[19:44] <teward> just in case ;)
[19:44] <ahasenack> ok, thanks
[19:44] <ahasenack> I can't create an MP, launchpad is timing out when I git push
[19:45] <ahasenack> known issue, I raised a support ticket
[19:45] <teward> right.
[19:45] <teward> i don't push to the Git with nginx, though, I usually upload direct.
[19:45] <teward> (old school package - I haven't gotten a git workflow for it worked yet)
[19:45] <teward> s/package/packaging/
[19:45] <ahasenack> it's fine
[19:45] <teward> unlike my GBP workflow in Debian for vmfs6-tools and xca :P
[19:46] <ahasenack> teward: what tz are you in?
[19:46] <ahasenack> it's 16h46 for me now
[19:46] <ahasenack> (19h46 UTC)
[19:47] <teward> Eastern US (15:46 local, 19:46 UTC)
[19:47] <teward> +- 1m30s for typing resulting in timeoffset
[19:47] <ahasenack> oh, look, same utc
[19:47] <ahasenack> :D
[19:47] <ahasenack> close enough
[19:47] <teward> yep xD
[19:48] <kanashiro> LocutusOfBorg, I mistakenly sync'ed a new version of src:puma on top of your delta and now I am trying to introduce the changes again to fix a regression. However, some questions arose during the review process, could you check this bug and try to give us some insight? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puma/+bug/1866881
[19:48] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1866881 in puma (Ubuntu) "Autopkgtest regression triggered by Ruby 2.7" [Undecided,New]
[19:49] <ahasenack> teward: thanks for your assistance on this today
[19:49] <teward> ahasenack: you're welcome. do me a solid though and prep the MIR for -geoip2 module as well?
[19:49] <teward> we'll throw that stuff onto Security's backlog ;)
[19:50] <teward> if not in time for release here, for G-series
[19:50] <ahasenack> already created the card: https://trello.com/c/ySFJNH0x
[19:50] <teward> nice
[19:50] <ahasenack> you can subscribe to it, it will have the mir bug shortly
[19:51] <teward> yep watching the card now :)
[19:52] <teward> and i'm subbed to all nginx bugs so when that MIR is filed I'll get a ping :)
[19:53] <teward> sorry I made things complex but :)
[19:53] <teward> best we're all in the loop :)
[20:00] <ahasenack> you did not make it comple
[20:00] <ahasenack> complex
[20:00] <ahasenack> I missed the libmaxminddb requirement in my bind9 9.16 update, I thought I could still use the old geoip1
[20:08] <bdmurray> vorlon: I ran across this MP the other day - do you have an opinion on the new sizes? https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-release-upgrader/eoan-kernel-sizes/+merge/374125
[20:17] <LocutusOfBorg> kanashiro, will have a look
[20:21] <vorlon> bdmurray: seems reasonable to me, particularly as these are fallbacks
[20:39] <LocutusOfBorg> kanashiro, I did sponsor the patch thanks
[20:43] <kanashiro> LocutusOfBorg, thank you
[21:01] <LocutusOfBorg> kanashiro, I added also the previous changelog entries
[21:01] <LocutusOfBorg> so we don't loose the history
[22:06] <mwhudson> vorlon: bah ubuntu-dev-tools in focal is not compatible with python2 any more
[22:06] <vorlon> heh
[22:07] <vorlon> sil2100: pleeease
[22:07] <mwhudson> i'll poke a bit to see how non-trivially
[22:55] <mwhudson> bluuurgh python2 sucks