| [08:41] <tomwardill> wgrant: sorry, what's a TTB? | |
| [08:41] <tomwardill> I can follow the rest of that | |
| [08:41] <wgrant> tomwardill: TranslationTemplatesBuild | |
| [08:42] <tomwardill> aha! | |
| [08:42] <tomwardill> yes, that feels roughly analogous | |
| [08:42] <tomwardill> thanks | |
| [08:42] <wgrant> Takes a branch, runs some predefined stuff on it, uploads translations to LP | |
| [08:42] <wgrant> So has no related Ubuntu series, even. | |
| [08:42] <tomwardill> yeah, that makes sense | |
| [10:41] <cjwatson> Agreed, I think that's the best approach | |
| [10:42] <cjwatson> Ideally make distro_arch_series / distro_series / pocket properties of the build work based on that | |
| [10:44] <tomwardill> yeah, that's what I think I've got | |
| [10:44] <tomwardill> (ish, it's a bit of a mess atm, currently tidying up) | |
| [15:17] <tomwardill> No url for <lp.oci.model.ocirecipebuild.OCIRecipeBuild object at 0x7f17e1d7d750> because <lp.oci.model.ocirecipebuild.OCIRecipeBuild object at 0x7f17e1d7d750> broke the chain. | |
| [15:17] <tomwardill> well. | |
| [15:18] <tomwardill> cjwatson: is that part of the work you did with the views? | |
| [15:23] <cjwatson> tomwardill: one sec | |
| [15:23] * cjwatson peers at +activereviews | |
| [15:24] <tomwardill> yeah, I just had a look through that | |
| [15:25] <cjwatson> I could have sworn I did something here, but where | |
| [15:25] <tomwardill> I definitely remember seeing a branch for it | |
| [15:25] <tomwardill> because we had the discussion about the rebase chain becoming a tree | |
| [15:25] <cjwatson> Maybe that was something else | |
| [15:26] <cjwatson> Oh, I did OCI *project* views (4a1852da9d872d815daa0bed1dd36ef9bcc2f699) | |
| [15:26] <cjwatson> I haven't done any recipe views, and they have no URLs defined at the moment | |
| [15:26] <cjwatson> Do you need me to work something out there? | |
| [15:26] <tomwardill> https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/launchpad/+git/launchpad/+merge/376106 | |
| [15:26] <tomwardill> ah, yes | |
| [15:27] <tomwardill> cjwatson: ideally if you have time, as I suspect it'd be quicker for you to do it agian than me | |
| [15:27] <cjwatson> OK | |
| [15:27] <cjwatson> Let me fix buildbot first | |
| [15:28] <tomwardill> cool, I'll work around this for now and continue implementing extraBuildArgs | |
| [17:50] <cjwatson> buildbot issues were exposed by converting away from urllib.urlopen, but I think they're fundamentally a txfixtures bug. I've pushed https://github.com/testing-cabal/txfixtures/pull/13 which should fix that (test failures there are fixed by https://github.com/testing-cabal/txfixtures/pull/12), and I've poked Free about reviewing them | |
| [17:51] <tomwardill> Ran 1 tests with 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skipped in 1.038 seconds. | |
| [17:51] <tomwardill> weeeeeee | |
| [17:51] <tomwardill> extraBuildArgs for OCIRecipeBuildBehaviour. | |
| [17:51] <tomwardill> Now to unpick the mess I've made, and ensure that it's actually the values that I wanted | |
| [17:55] <tomwardill> cjwatson: that doesn't look like it was a whole lot of fun to find | |
| [18:39] <cjwatson> tomwardill: Not exactly | |
| [23:21] <cjwatson> lifeless: Thanks for the testing-cabal invite. Do you think I could have PyPI access to txfixtures? | |
| [23:21] <lifeless> cjwatson: of course | |
| [23:22] <lifeless> I wish pypi had teams | |
| [23:22] <cjwatson> Yeah, totally | |
| [23:25] <lifeless> added you to a few random projects | |
| [23:26] <cjwatson> Thanks, I like randomness | |
| [23:27] <lifeless> speaking of random, you should consider porting launchpad to rust | |
| [23:28] <cjwatson> A nice small project | |
| [23:28] <lifeless> side project for when you're not busy | |
| [23:29] <cjwatson> :) | |
| [23:29] <lifeless> but this is actually a serious suggestion | |
| [23:30] <lifeless> I've been watching the way you've been adding things in - more and more microservice style additions | |
| [23:30] <lifeless> which is great | |
| [23:30] <lifeless> I presume you're ported or nearly so to run live on py3 at this point | |
| [23:31] <lifeless> which means you'll have mypy gradual typing | |
| [23:32] <lifeless> anyhow, point is that rust productivity has been steadily climbing (as has golangs for fairness), but in the last 6-12 months I think things have gotten to the point where for production services, developer productivity now exceeds that of python | |
| [23:33] <cjwatson> Released txfixtures 0.4.3 | |
| [23:34] <lifeless> so I think if Launchpad wants to be around for another 5-10 years, a sensible question to ask is what is the most developer efficient platform for it to be in, and a dead-end fork of an experimental branch of Zope probably isn't it :) | |
| [23:34] <cjwatson> It's conceivable that we'd look at Rust for an experimental service at some point, though there's some politics too of course | |
| [23:34] <lifeless> the rest of the conclusions pretty much follow :P | |
| [23:34] <cjwatson> I don't think it's really true that we're on a dead-end fork of Zope any more - I upgraded to newest versions of everything late last year | |
| [23:35] <cjwatson> Certainly Zope has less mindshare and I want to get off e.g. zope.server | |
| [23:35] <lifeless> I retract my statements then | |
| [23:35] <lifeless> I had thought that a lot of the stuff we had was experiments that never gained traction | |
| [23:35] <cjwatson> I don't disagree with everything you say, although there is the minor practical note that I haven't learned Rust yet :) | |
| [23:36] <cjwatson> I think we are probably in a better situation upstream-wise than you remember | |
| [23:36] <lifeless> well done, thats fantastic news | |
| [23:37] <cjwatson> At the moment I think we have two small zope.* forks | |
| [23:37] <lifeless> I think you will very much like rust | |
| [23:37] <lifeless> and hey - its Gnome aligned :P | |
| [23:38] <cjwatson> zope.session to stick with an old session cookie algorithm, and zope.testrunner for a couple of tweaks to test ID handling and some changes to thread leak handling (I got all the subunit stuff back upstream again, which was the big chunk) | |
| [23:43] <cjwatson> I think I take a more incrementalist attitude (it was ever thus); there's still a lot we can do to move LP onto things developers find familiar, and at the moment (modulo finishing the py3 port) I think we're in a good position to migrate to them gradually | |
| [23:44] <cjwatson> while possibly looking to entirely different platforms for microservices | |
| [23:44] <lifeless> certainly any migration would have to be incremental :P | |
| [23:47] * cjwatson sleeps | |
| [23:47] <lifeless> night! thanks for the chat | |