| [00:03] <wxl> yes i noticed that guiverc | |
| [00:04] <wxl> i mentioned to @hmollercl how to make it be nm-connection-editor by default. hopefully that will happen soon (let me know if you need me to do it hans) | |
| [00:10] <wxl> alternately, we can't specialize a default size for qterminal unless we pull this in https://github.com/lxqt/qterminal/commit/c8c06489ec87431b33112e5ee46f8d54410c7cc3 | |
| [00:11] <wxl> even still i'm not sure that would solve the problem in all cases | |
| [05:37] <lubot> <The_LoudSpeaker> @RikMills [<reply to image>], I am still not understanding, which two versions did you use to create this debdiff? | |
| [06:40] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL338a75079e6e: Fix styling] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL338a75079e6e | |
| [06:44] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL01c4aced619c: Add Image quality slider] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL01c4aced619c | |
| [06:49] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL419f56e73d15: Add note that template does not always show] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL419f56e73d15 | |
| [06:52] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL0b861a32a040: Add Save first screenshot showing in autosave note] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL0b861a32a040 | |
| [06:55] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rMANUAL5b71355bca96: Make text match] lynorian (Lyn Perrine) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rMANUAL5b71355bca96 | |
| [08:11] <lubot> <RikMills> @The_LoudSpeaker [I am still not understanding, which two versions did you use to create this debd …], It is the diff between 0.14.1-1 and 0.14.1-1ubuntu1 | |
| [08:20] <lubot> <The_LoudSpeaker> The one I did was between 0.14.1-0ubuntu1 and 0.14.1-1ubuntu1 | |
| [08:21] <lubot> <The_LoudSpeaker> When 0.14.1-0ubuntu1 was created, at that time the debdiff you made must have been done na? | |
| [08:26] <lubot> <RikMills> I think I have said this more than once already, but to be very clear. | |
| [08:28] <lubot> <RikMills> In a debian merge, the debian/changelog merge entry MUST document the difference between the DEBIAN version and the RESULT OF YOUR MERGE | |
| [08:28] <lubot> <RikMills> NOT the difference between the last Ubuntu version and the new Ubuntu version | |
| [16:35] <lubot> <HMollerCl> so debian/compat is no longer used? | |
| [16:35] <lubot> <HMollerCl> isntead Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 12) | |
| [16:58] <lubot> <RikMills> @HMollerCl [so debian/compat is no longer used?], as @tsimonq2 posted https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg00000.html | |
| [16:58] <lubot> <RikMills> * The "debhelper-compat (= 12)" build-dependency to replace … "Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 12~)" and "echo 12 > debian/compat". | |
| [17:05] <lubot> <HMollerCl> That means that all packages should be upgraded? Or only the ones that will be "touched" anyway? | |
| [17:06] <lubot> <RikMills> I would say only those that get touched, or have an issue with 11 | |
| [17:07] <lubot> <RikMills> @tsimonq2 ^ | |
| [17:08] <lubot> <RikMills> though my opinion is coloured by having to curate kde stuff, which is over 300 packages... 😆 | |
| [17:45] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @RikMills [though my opinion is coloured by having to curate kde stuff, which is over 300 p …], Yeah, in our case go ahead and refresh them all | |
| [17:45] <lubot> <tsimonq2> Do a thorough look at all of them | |
| [17:46] <lubot> <tsimonq2> Standards version, debhelper compat, evil and pedantic Lintian, the works | |
| [17:46] <lubot> <tsimonq2> And we removed the 2222 from VCS | |
| [17:46] <lubot> <tsimonq2> So go ahead and remove that | |
| [17:51] <lubot> <Rutvikm> Is there a special version for Raspberry Pi … If not, can I test Lubuntu on it … Has anyone done it( @The_LoudSpeaker) | |
| [17:59] <lubot> <RikMills> @tsimonq2 [Do a thorough look at all of them], I would love to be able to do that in Kubuntu, but ENOTIME! | |
| [18:40] <lubot> <ItzSwirlz> @tsimonq2 @HMollerCl @RikMills Is debian/compat even needed? | |
| [18:45] <lubot> <The_LoudSpeaker> @Rutvikm [Is there a special version for Raspberry Pi? … If not, can I test Lubuntu on it? …], There isn't as of now. You can install lubuntu-desktop and sddm on ubuntu-server on Pi | |
| [19:16] <lubot> <HMollerCl> @ItzSwirlz [@tsimonq2 @HMollerCl @RikMills Is debian/compat even needed?], Not anymore | |
| [21:46] <wxl> @apt-ghetto do you know enough about thsi subject that you could put together a solution as a shellprocess? https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1203 | |
| [21:46] <ubot93> Issue 1203 in calamares/calamares "Encryption does not work well with non-QWERTY keyboards" [Open] | |
| [22:08] <wxl> @kc2bez @tsimonq2 @hmollercl @The_LoudSpeaker what do you think about creating a shellprocess to alert the user that they have mounts that could prevent erase disk as an option and optionally allow them to unmount/swapoff? re: https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/860 | |
| [22:08] <ubot93> Issue 860 in calamares/calamares "re-think handling of (auto-)mounted partitions" [Open] | |
| [22:11] <lubot> <kc2bez> I have been pondering this for a bit. | |
| [22:11] <lubot> <kc2bez> I hadn't thought of an interactive approach until you mentioned it. | |
| [22:12] <lubot> <kc2bez> I was more or less just thinking of swap too. | |
| [22:12] <lubot> <kc2bez> My thought process was a little narrow. | |
| [22:15] <wxl> there's a couple ways we could do it | |
| [22:15] <wxl> we could do qt, pyqt, or my favorite kdialog | |
| [22:16] <wxl> i would REALLY be inclined towards the latter because it adds one really small depend but it's super practical and crazy easy to use in shell scripts | |
| [22:16] <wxl> we use it at work quite a bit | |
| [22:44] <lubot> <aptghetto> @wxl [<wxl> @apt-ghetto do you know enough about thsi subject that you could put toget …], I guess you mean creating a core.img with a shellprocess? No, I don't know enough about it. But I don't think, that this is a good solution. It should be handled by Calamares. … If a newer Grub is installed, the core.img is replaced. And how c | |
| [22:44] <lubot> an we sign the custom Grub core.img without a valid private key of Canonical for Secure Boot? | |