|
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC |
|
[06:16] <mborzecki> morning |
|
[07:56] <zyga> Hey hey |
|
[08:01] <pedronis> #8061 needs a 2nd review (it's small) |
|
[08:01] <mup> PR #8061: daemon: make users result more consistent <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8061> |
|
[08:01] <mborzecki> pedronis: zyga: mvo: hey |
|
[08:02] <pedronis> mborzecki: hi, should I re-review 8001 or will you push more to it? |
|
[08:03] <mborzecki> pedronis: pushed a little comment tweak, but it should be ok for re-review |
|
[08:03] <pedronis> thx |
|
[08:31] * zyga-laptop has some stuff going on at home with friend dropping a dog for weekend |
|
[08:41] <pedronis> mvo: I never noticed that snap-bootstrap has a bootstrap subpackage just about creating partitions, it's a bit weird tbh |
|
[08:42] <mvo> pedronis: yeah, it's a bit of a leftover of the early days, I guess we need to clean this up |
|
[09:02] <pedronis> mborzecki: +1 on #8001 but there are still some things that need a cleanup |
|
[09:02] <mup> PR #8001: boot: enable UC20 kernel extraction and bootState20 handling <Needs Samuele review> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8001> |
|
[09:05] <pedronis> mborzecki: let me know if you want me to address some of that or you can |
|
[09:05] <pedronis> the last comment is mostly a remark btw, it might get clearer when we split up commit in variants |
|
[09:09] <mborzecki> pedronis: i'll look into that |
|
[09:09] <pedronis> mborzecki: I'm fixing my first comment |
|
[09:09] <mborzecki> pedronis: ok |
|
[09:11] <pedronis> mborzecki: I did this: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8001/commits/9906cdbbfcbf292e2e1e91c004dbba810e8bb0d8 |
|
[09:11] <mup> PR #8001: boot: enable UC20 kernel extraction and bootState20 handling <Needs Samuele review> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8001> |
|
[09:11] * pedronis has some quick errands to take care of |
|
[09:50] <mborzecki> pedronis: ok, on to 8001, have you pushed the comment fix? |
|
[09:50] <mborzecki> ah errands, i take that as a no then :) |
|
[09:57] <pedronis> mborzecki: I pushed a fix for my comment, not a a comment fix |
|
[09:57] <mborzecki> pedronis: ah, ok |
|
[09:59] <pedronis> mborzecki: what's left is comment in tests that seems not correct, they mention extraction in tests that test other things etc |
|
[10:48] <mborzecki> pedronis: updated now, tweaked the test a little bit too |
|
[10:48] <mborzecki> anyone can take a look at https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8060 ? |
|
[10:48] <mup> PR #8060: gadget: skip update when mounted filesystem content is identical <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8060> |
|
[10:54] <zyga-laptop> mborzecki ay |
|
[10:54] <mborzecki> zyga-laptop: hm? what broke? |
|
[10:54] <zyga-laptop> ? |
|
[10:54] <zyga-laptop> nothing |
|
[10:54] <zyga-laptop> I'm just saying I'll look |
|
[10:54] <zyga-laptop> :) |
|
[10:54] <zyga-laptop> but first, let me grab tea |
|
[10:57] <pedronis> mborzecki: thx |
|
[10:57] <pedronis> mvo: mborzecki: #8001 needs some kind of 2nd review |
|
[10:57] <mup> PR #8001: boot: enable UC20 kernel extraction and bootState20 handling <Needs Samuele review> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8001> |
|
[11:18] <pedronis> #8036 needs a 2nd review |
|
[11:18] <mup> PR #8036: snapstate: refactor things to add the re-refresh task last <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8036> |
|
[11:28] <ijohnson> pedronis, mborzecki should I remove the check in commit() for `if u20.env["kernel_status"] != "" {` ? |
|
[11:28] <pedronis> ijohnson: it was mostly a remark |
|
[11:28] <pedronis> ijohnson: we can think about it when we refactor |
|
[11:29] <pedronis> ijohnson: I'm more interested in this things landing atm |
|
[11:29] <pedronis> but it needs a review from somebody that is not me |
|
[11:29] <ijohnson> pedronis ack I'll wait for a review then |
|
[11:29] <mborzecki> yeah, not me either :P, mvo maybe? |
|
[11:30] <ijohnson> pedronis my refactor with the base snap is much simpler as commit () is 3 different functions for different scenarios |
|
[11:30] <mup> PR snapd#8072 opened: daemon, store: better expose single action errors <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8072> |
|
[11:31] <Chipaca> can I get a second review on #8061 ? |
|
[11:31] <mup> PR #8061: daemon: make users result more consistent <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8061> |
|
[11:32] <zyga-laptop> mborzecki https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8060#pullrequestreview-351447565 +1 |
|
[11:32] <mup> PR #8060: gadget: skip update when mounted filesystem content is identical <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8060> |
|
[11:35] <mborzecki> Chipaca: do we get to kill /v2/create-user? |
|
[11:36] <Chipaca> mborzecki: thank you for the review |
|
[11:36] <Chipaca> mborzecki: not at this point in time |
|
[11:36] <Chipaca> mborzecki: killing it would mean adding a deprecation notice, and removing it in N releases |
|
[11:36] <Chipaca> that has not been done |
|
[11:37] <Chipaca> mborzecki: instead we stop talking to it and hope it gets bored and goes away, i guess? :-) |
|
[11:37] <mborzecki> hahah |
|
[11:37] <mborzecki> or return an error telling to use the new api |
|
[11:38] <Chipaca> mborzecki: but, i think we're stuck with it for a good while anyway; people are using it for its intended purpose on devices in the wild |
|
[11:39] <Chipaca> 'people' here includes some big companies, but also some small companies like us via mwhudson iirc |
|
[11:52] <Chipaca> zyga-laptop: how was your famous phrase? "nothing can break with this" but much more nicely said |
|
[11:52] <zyga-laptop> the one where everything breaks? :D |
|
[11:53] <zyga-laptop> <zyga> There is no breaking or risky change induced by this branch. |
|
[11:53] <zyga-laptop> Chipaca ^ |
|
[11:53] <ogra> was ther a T-Shirt ? |
|
[11:53] <ogra> *there |
|
[11:53] <zyga-laptop> haha |
|
[11:53] <zyga-laptop> I wish |
|
[11:54] <Chipaca> zyga-laptop: thanks |
|
[11:54] <Chipaca> zyga-laptop: used it in my latest |
|
[11:54] <mup> PR snapd#8073 opened: daemon: drop support for the DELETE method <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8073> |
|
[11:54] <Chipaca> ^ |
|
[11:54] <zyga-laptop> if it fails it's the official label for <complex> tag |
|
[11:59] <zyga-laptop> Chipaca final commit of the week? :) |
|
[11:59] <Chipaca> zyga-laptop: ~4 more to come |
|
[12:09] <mup> PR snapd#8061 closed: daemon: make users result more consistent <Created by chipaca> <Merged by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8061> |
|
[12:11] <pedronis> mmh, 8001 will likely conflict with 7705, another reason to try to get it in today |
|
[12:12] <mup> PR snapcraft#2901 opened: python plugin: do not leak snapcraft's site-packages <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2901> |
|
[12:15] <mup> PR snapd#8074 opened: client: move to /v2/users; implement RemoveUser <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8074> |
|
[12:26] <mvo> mborzecki: re "yeah, not me either :P, mvo maybe?" - which review was that? |
|
[12:30] <Chipaca> hmm |
|
[12:30] <Chipaca> in a purported 16.04.5 install: |
|
[12:30] <Chipaca> snapd is already the newest version (2.0.2). |
|
[12:30] <Chipaca> hmm² |
|
[12:30] <pedronis> mvo: 8001 |
|
[12:33] <mup> PR snapd#7812 closed: asserts: parse plug-names/slot-names constraints <Created by pedronis> <Merged by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7812> |
|
[12:51] <mup> PR snapcraft#2902 opened: static: fix some valid flake8 issues <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2902> |
|
[12:53] <cmatsuoka> Chipaca: https://github.com/askervin/python-il/ |
|
[12:54] <Chipaca> cmatsuoka: micropython's had that for ages :-D |
|
[12:54] <mup> PR snapcraft#2903 opened: tests: fix status test for staging store <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2903> |
|
[12:54] <Chipaca> cmatsuoka: you should check micropython out sometime, if you haven't |
|
[12:54] * cmatsuoka checks |
|
[12:55] <Chipaca> hah, 6 years down the road I'm still contributor #6 :-) |
|
[12:55] <Chipaca> i guess some things move slowly after a point |
|
[12:55] <Chipaca> ah no, #8 now |
|
[12:55] <mup> PR #8: launchpad.net/snappy -> github.com/ubuntu-core/snappy <Created by chipaca> <Merged by elopio> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8> |
|
[12:55] <Chipaca> good |
|
[12:55] <Chipaca> mup: shaddup you |
|
[12:55] <cmatsuoka> haha |
|
[12:55] <mup> Chipaca: I apologize, but I'm pretty strict about only responding to known commands. |
|
[12:56] <Chipaca> mup: from where i'm sitting it looks like you respond to unknown commands as well, tbh |
|
[12:56] <mup> Chipaca: In-com-pre-hen-si-ble-ness. |
|
[12:56] <pedronis> Chipaca: you are #4 by additions |
|
[12:57] <Chipaca> hehe |
|
[12:57] <Chipaca> it's not the size of the pull requests, it's how you use them |
|
[12:57] <Chipaca> or something |
|
[12:59] <pedronis> Chipaca: all those stats are questionable |
|
[12:59] <Chipaca> mhmm |
|
[13:09] <mup> PR snapcraft#2904 opened: meta: move Snap's from_dict() system-username parsing into new method <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2904> |
|
[13:12] <mup> PR snapcraft#2905 opened: requirements-devel: uprev pyinstaller to 3.6 <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2905> |
|
[13:30] <ijohnson> good morning for real this time folks |
|
[13:30] <mborzecki> ijohnson: hey! |
|
[13:31] <ijohnson> hey mborzecki |
|
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch |
|
[13:43] <mborzecki> off to school |
|
[14:29] * zyga afk for lunch and stuff |
|
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab |
|
[15:06] <mup> PR snapcraft#2906 opened: [ignore me] travis test <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2906> |
|
[15:11] <Chipaca> pedronis: d'oh, was in such a hurry i didn't add tests :-| |
|
[15:14] <roadmr> 😱 |
|
[15:21] <pedronis> Chipaca: well, we might pick it up unless missing that blocks the follow ups |
|
[15:23] <mborzecki> re |
|
[15:23] <Chipaca> roadmr: hush, you |
|
[15:23] <Chipaca> pedronis: nah i'll get to it in a bit |
|
[15:23] <roadmr> 😯 |
|
[15:23] <roadmr> 🤫 |
|
[15:24] <pedronis> Chipaca: on another PR I find funny that you added single error wrapping, while you removed in another |
|
[15:24] <pedronis> I wouldn't add it given it wasn't there and I don't think it relates to what that PR is trying to achieve |
|
[15:24] <Chipaca> pedronis: ah, probably true, i think that's a mis-change |
|
[15:25] <Chipaca> pedronis: also i think that bit isn't tested (otherwise there'd be a change in the test and i don't see it) |
|
[15:25] <pedronis> yes, as well to that |
|
[15:25] <Chipaca> as in, it wasn't tested before my refactor i mean |
|
[15:25] <pedronis> anyway another reason not to touch that bit in particular |
|
[15:26] <Chipaca> mhmm |
|
[15:36] <Chipaca> mborzecki: pedronis: I've addressed your feedback on #8074 |
|
[15:36] <mup> PR #8074: client: move to /v2/users; implement RemoveUser <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8074> |
|
[15:36] <cjp256> Any thoughts on what would cause a `Cannot retreive credentials in unknown state` when running `snap set system experimental.snapd-snap=true`? |
|
[15:38] <cjp256> nvm, that's coming from multipass exec |
|
[15:38] <mborzecki> Chipaca: thx! |
|
[15:51] <ijohnson> afk for a little bit |
|
[15:53] <pedronis> Chipaca: yes, all the error paths are not tested in users, something for us at some point |
|
[15:53] <pedronis> I mean in client/users.go |
|
[16:03] <Chipaca> pedronis: un P || Q && R, R is only evaluated if !P and Q |
|
[16:03] <Chipaca> pedronis: right? |
|
[16:03] <pedronis> yes, just me being confused for a second |
|
[16:03] <Chipaca> ah ok |
|
[16:04] <pedronis> otoh some parenthesis wouldn't hurt |
|
[16:04] <Chipaca> i mean, i always think of it as wrong-associative, but :) |
|
[16:04] <Chipaca> pedronis: yep |
|
[16:04] <Chipaca> pedronis: pushing that in a sec |
|
[16:08] <Chipaca> going to take a break now, will bbl to continue punishing travis |
|
[16:13] * Chipaca not gone yet |
|
[16:53] <mvo> ijohnson: 8001 is good from my POV, just one concern about the panic() in there but that can be a followup, let's get the next one up :) |
|
[16:58] <ijohnson> Thanks mvo looking now |
|
[16:59] <ijohnson> ah just missed him oh well |
|
[17:01] <mup> PR snapd#7813 closed: interfaces/policy: enforce plug-names/slot-names constraints <Created by pedronis> <Merged by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7813> |
|
[17:08] <pedronis> ijohnson: yes, looks like he was looking at some code, because I commented on that in https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8001#discussion_r372451985 and mborzecki fixed it already |
|
[17:08] <mup> PR #8001: boot: enable UC20 kernel extraction and bootState20 handling <Needs Samuele review> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8001> |
|
[17:08] <pedronis> *some old code |
|
[17:08] <ijohnson> yes probably some github ui issue |
|
[17:09] <ijohnson> pedronis: should I merge now then? |
|
[17:09] <pedronis> ijohnson: I would say yes, anyway commit itself will be refactored again |
|
[17:09] <pedronis> afaiu |
|
[17:09] <ijohnson> pedronis: ack, yes I have refactored it |
|
[17:11] <mup> PR snapd#8001 closed: boot: enable UC20 kernel extraction and bootState20 handling <Needs Samuele review> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <Merged by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8001> |
|
[17:15] <mborzecki> yay! |
|
[17:15] <ijohnson> yay indeed! |
|
[17:24] <pedronis> ijohnson: there was indeed a conflict with pawel PR but I pushed a fix hopefully already |
|
[17:24] <pedronis> #8036 needs a 2nd review |
|
[17:24] <mup> PR #8036: snapstate: refactor things to add the re-refresh task last <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8036> |
|
[17:24] <ijohnson> pedronis: which of pawel's PRs? |
|
[17:50] <pedronis> ijohnson: #7705 |
|
[17:50] <mup> PR #7705: o/devicestate: handle preseed in firstboot <Preseeding 🍞> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7705> |
|
[17:50] <ijohnson> pedronis: ah right, I have that on my list to review, I'll try to get to that today or Monday |
|
[17:58] <mup> PR snapcraft#2902 closed: static: fix some valid flake8 issues <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2902> |
|
[17:58] <mup> PR snapcraft#2905 closed: requirements-devel: uprev pyinstaller to 3.6 <Created by cjp256> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2905> |
|
[18:41] * Chipaca kicks travis a bit more |
|
[18:43] <mup> PR snapcraft#2903 closed: tests: fix status test for staging store <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2903> |
|
[18:58] <ijohnson> ugh travis why do you have to be broke right after I merged my PR :-( |
|
[19:00] <Chipaca> ijohnson: it had a troubled childhood and has difficulty expressing its love for you |
|
[19:00] <ijohnson> Chipaca: all that kicking probably didn't help |
|
[19:01] * Chipaca punts it back into orbit |
|
[19:01] <Chipaca> ijohnson: what kicking |
|
[19:01] <ijohnson> tbh I probably wouldn't work too well either if somebody kept kicking me every time I did something wrong |
|
[19:01] <Chipaca> ijohnson: travis is the whipping boy |
|
[19:03] <ijohnson> I'd just like to take this opportunity to thank travis for not being able to kick us back |
|
[19:03] * Chipaca actually LOLs |
|
[19:13] <zyga> Chipaca: are you lol'ing as eod-ing? :) |
|
[19:23] <sdhd-sascha> hey "folks" ;-) |
|
[19:24] <sdhd-sascha> is to say, the word "folks" okay ? for woman, man, and ... ? |
|
[19:24] <sdhd-sascha> is it ? |
|
[19:26] <sdhd-sascha> (sorry, sometimes i make failures. ) |
|
[19:28] <ijohnson> sdhd-sascha: yes folks is okay for a generic group of people |
|
[19:30] <sdhd-sascha> ijohnson: thank you :-) *great* ... i'm really poor in language's .. (but i grow) ;-) thank you |
|
[19:30] <ijohnson> np |
|
[19:30] <sdhd-sascha> :-) |
|
[19:32] <sdhd-sascha> ijohnson: still, and again - thankyou |
|
[20:01] <mup> PR snapcraft#2908 opened: Tt <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2908> |
|
[20:28] <mup> PR snapcraft#2906 closed: [ignore me] travis test <Created by cjp256> <Closed by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2906> |
|
[20:28] <mup> PR snapcraft#2908 closed: Tt <Created by sergiusens> <Closed by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2908> |
|
[20:35] <mup> PR snapd#8074 closed: client: move to /v2/users; implement RemoveUser <Created by chipaca> <Merged by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8074> |
|
[20:42] <Chipaca> #8063 is now open for business |
|
[20:43] <mup> PR #8063: cmd/snap: implement 'snap remove-user' <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8063> |
|
[21:10] <mup> PR snapd#8075 opened: boot: don't use "kernel" from the modeenv anymore <Simple 😃> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8075> |
|
[21:42] * sdhd-sascha Chipaca sorry for me ;-) |
|
[21:42] <Chipaca> sdhd-sascha: ? |
|
[21:43] <sdhd-sascha> Chipaca: i'm not so easy - sometimes ;-) i love your hints ;-) |
|
[21:43] * sdhd-sascha sometimes i have too much beer ... |
|
[21:44] <Chipaca> sdhd-sascha: glad you enjoy them, but i'm at a loss as to which ones in particular you mean this time :-D |
|
[21:46] <sdhd-sascha> Chipaca: as i said - you give me hints, which are very cool, and i understand . not in time. but shorten ... you have a nice way to write ;-) |
|
[21:49] <sdhd-sascha> Chipaca: i love your sarcasm ;-) |
|
[21:49] <Chipaca> :-) |
|
[21:49] <sdhd-sascha> ;-) |
|
[21:49] * sdhd-sascha afk - look for my wife... |
|
[21:53] * sdhd-sascha back (for a moment) .. is it bad, that i can better talk to you folks... ? i cant say it to .... |
|
[21:54] <Chipaca> sdhd-sascha: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ it happens :-) |
|
[21:54] * Chipaca takes the dog for a wander |
|
[21:55] * sdhd-sascha i wonder, Chipaca how you type this ;-) thank you - make me smile ;-) |
|
[21:57] <sdhd-sascha> hey, ;-) look forward |
|
[22:04] <mup> PR snapd#8076 opened: boot: add TryBase and BaseStatus to modeenv; use in snap-bootstrap <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8076> |
|
[22:06] * ijohnson EOWs |
|
[22:06] <mup> PR snapd#8077 opened: boot: enable base snap updates in bootstate20 <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8077> |
|
[23:06] * sdhd-sascha how much is too much talk ... can i be litte crazy |
|
|