UbuntuIRC / 2014 /12 /01 /#maas.txt
niansa
Initial commit
4aa5fce
=== CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob|Away
=== CyberJacob|Away is now known as CyberJacob
=== roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk
=== roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch
=== jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara
[16:34] <roadmr> zyga: hey, could you please remind me how to get the effective run order for a given whitelist? I'd like to see the actual order plainbox will use after reordering and dependencies and stuff
=== cmagina_ is now known as cmagina
=== roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk
=== roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr
[20:33] <designated> does MAAS account for multiple bonded NICs before handing a machine off for juju charm deployment?
[20:34] <roaksoax> designated: not yet
[20:34] <roaksoax> designated: it is in the roadmap
[20:36] <designated> roaksoax: is it possible to deploy a node using MAAS and manually configure the logical network interface consisting of multiple bonded, physical, NICs and referencing that logical interface in the juju charms?
[20:37] <designated> it seems to me, not supporting bonded NICs would severely limit the use of MAAS/juju for a production ready openstack deployment. is there an ETA for bonded NIC support?
[20:46] <roaksoax> designated: it is
[20:46] <roaksoax> designated: 6 months
[20:46] <roaksoax> designated: you can do late commands
[20:47] <designated> roaksoax: so i can just have a interfaces file that is configured the way I want my NICs bonded and use a late command to download that file before passing to juju?
[20:48] <roaksoax> designated: pretty much
[20:48] <roaksoax> designated: or you can do that on the charm
[20:48] <designated> roaksoax: thank you
=== roadmr_ is now known as roadmr
=== mscheel is now known as Guest34941