| === karni is now known as karni-afk | |
| === karni-afk is now known as karni | |
| [17:35] <teward> wgrant: has there been any font size changes in the UI for the Overview, Code, Bugs, etc. buttons on pages? | |
| [17:36] <teward> seems to me the font size was reduced (where it is in relation to everything else makes it seem dwarfed and a little more tricky to work with, in my opinion) | |
| === broder__ is now known as broder | |
| [20:12] <wgrant> teward: It hasn't changed at all, just moved. It was always pretty tricky to work with, and I'm very open to suggestions for improving it. | |
| [20:14] <teward> wgrant: +2pt font size on the 'tab bar' is my opinion, i'm just too lazy to write my own userscript to do that XD | |
| [20:14] <teward> i miss the breadcrumb trail too, but i'm glad the bug numbers are back | |
| [20:14] <wgrant> The breadcrumb trail still exists when the rest of the page doesn't duplicate its information. | |
| [20:14] <teward> although the font size for that could do with a small increase too | |
| [20:14] <teward> true, but on bugs in the ubuntu namespace, they're effectively gone, AFAICT | |
| [20:14] <teward> which is fine, i'm happy to snag the bug number from the URL, but meh. | |
| [20:15] <wgrant> The bug number is back now, though. | |
| [20:15] <teward> as i said | |
| [20:15] <teward> grrrr, my VPN is misbehaving, give me 2 minutes to switch to a non-VPN'd connection | |
| [20:15] <wgrant> https://dogfood.paddev.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bugs is still running the old code for comparison, by the way. | |
| [20:15] <teward> ack | |
| [20:15] <wgrant> Compare vs https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bugs | |
| [20:15] <dobey> eh, the "tabs" seem fine to me | |
| [20:16] <teward> dobey: that's just a minor one, i'm harping on the ease-of-readability now of the bug numbers | |
| [20:16] <teward> smaller and not bold, makes it a little tricky to read on standard res without zooming, at least on this screen | |
| [20:16] * teward shrugs | |
| [20:17] <dobey> and i'm on a 185 PPI screen, and zoomed out one level :P | |
| [20:17] <wgrant> Ah true, it used to be bold. | |
| [20:17] <dobey> the problem with the bug number display on the bug page for that bug, is that it's quite low contrast | |
| [20:17] <teward> wgrant: and AFAICT maybe a point or two bigger | |
| [20:17] <dobey> as it's gray on white | |
| [20:17] <teward> dobey: true, that's another issue | |
| [20:17] <wgrant> I only stuck the bug number in there because there was no other way to do it without styling changes. | |
| [20:17] <teward> bold or bkacl would be a little better. | |
| [20:17] <teward> s/bkacl/black/ | |
| [20:18] <teward> and apparently i need to beat my keyboard into submission again | |
| [20:18] <dobey> at least darker grey would help | |
| [20:18] <wgrant> It should soon be a number next to the summary, like it is in bug listings today, but that requires some minor fixes to the inline title editor. | |
| [20:18] <dobey> oh, that would be beetter, yeah | |
| [20:18] <teward> indeed. | |
| [20:19] <teward> my only last complaint on a bugs page is aesthetics - if you keep 'reported by' that font size looks dwarfed next to the 'person' image next to the name... | |
| [20:19] <teward> might just be because of the size of that image, but... | |
| [20:19] <dobey> my main issue with the current bug # line is the contrast | |
| [20:19] <teward> agreed with dobey, a size increase or a contrast increase (darker gray or black) would fix that | |
| [20:19] <wgrant> The current bug number line is the easiest thing that I could do to fix the regression from hiding the breadcrumbs :) | |
| [20:19] <wgrant> It's very much a this-week solution. | |
| [20:19] <teward> yep | |
| [20:19] <wgrant> Thanks for the feedback. | |
| [20:20] <teward> you're welcome, sorry if i'm harping on the nittygritty tiny things... | |
| [20:20] <dobey> if it's going away in favor of bug # in the summary line, i'm fine with that | |
| [20:20] * teward has a horrible penchant for doing that | |
| [20:20] <teward> agreed with dobey | |
| [20:20] <wgrant> Nittygritty annoying usability issues are the worst. | |
| [20:20] <teward> heheh | |
| [20:20] <dobey> as the rest of the info is duplicated in the expansion | |
| [20:20] <teward> last question: what's the plan for the "reported by"? Where will that go whne that line disappears | |
| [20:20] <teward> or is it staying? | |
| [20:21] <dobey> teward: click the arrow next to the project name to expand it | |
| [20:21] <dobey> teward: it's already there :) | |
| [20:21] <dobey> along with confirmed date even | |
| [20:21] <teward> that's... fine, but those of us who use at-a-glance looking have to hunt for it now. | |
| [20:22] <teward> granted, I've started pulling bug data for me to work on via the api, so... | |
| [20:22] <teward> all the data exists in that method :P | |
| [20:22] <dobey> which you have to do anyway, if the bug has multiple projects/packages | |
| [20:22] <teward> mhm | |
| [20:22] <dobey> if you even care about that data | |
| [20:22] <teward> i pull the 'submitted by' in the automated reports that get generated of things in the nginx package on my radar. the API is a useful tool :) | |
| [20:23] <teward> thanks to you all for the assistance with all that by the way | |
| [20:23] <dobey> i mostly only use it to know who to yell at for filing crappy bug reports :) | |
| [20:23] <teward> heheh | |
| [20:37] <wgrant> No real plans for the "Reported by" line at the moment. Trying to make the header sane so far. | |
| [20:38] <wgrant> But any feedback you have, I'd be glad to hear. | |
| [20:38] <teward> there's probably bound to be more as changes come | |
| [20:38] <wgrant> Starting with making https://dogfood.paddev.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bugs not say the package and distro four times in the header each. | |
| [20:41] <dobey> well, if you don't know where you're searching for in that entry box, you can't say we didn't try to tell you | |
| [20:42] <wgrant> Heh | |
| [20:54] <ScottK> wgrant: On that page, I almost always want to sort by date most recently changed and it's annoying I can't. | |
| [20:58] <wgrant> ScottK: You can sort by the shown columns, and select which columns to show, and date_last_updated is shown by default. I suspect you've selected not to show that column in the past. | |
| [20:58] <wgrant> Click the gear in the top left of the table to enable it. | |
| [20:58] <wgrant> (you still can't change the default sort, though) | |
| [20:58] <ScottK> Right. It's missing from the default. | |
| [20:59] <ScottK> I know how to manage it, but it's annoying. | |
| [21:09] <wgrant> ScottK: Oh, I thought it was in the default. Hm. | |
| [21:09] <ScottK> Don't think so. I'm on a ~new system where I've never been to dogfood before and I don't see it. | |
| === Pici is now known as Guest74903 | |
| === zoktar_ is now known as zoktar | |
| === Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho | |