UbuntuIRC / 2014 /11 /17 /#launchpad.txt
niansa
Initial commit
4aa5fce
[08:12] <mpt> dobey, yes, it works fine now
=== alexlist` is now known as alexlist
=== fabo_ is now known as fabo
=== persia__ is now known as persia
=== gmb`` is now known as gmb
=== karni_ is now known as karni-lunch
=== dpm_ is now known as dpm
=== karni-lunch is now known as karni
=== tasdomas` is now known as tasdomas
=== vidplace7_ is now known as vidplace7
[17:56] <ScottK> Could someone with access see where the latest sddm upload went? It was uploaded over 10 minutes ago and didn't make it to vivid New yet.
[17:59] <cjwatson> 16:45 -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected sddm [source] (vivid-proposed) [0.10.0+dfsg1-0ubuntu1]
[17:59] <cjwatson> Not that one?
[17:59] <ScottK> No.
[18:00] <cjwatson> One moment then.
[18:00] <ScottK> That's when I rejected the first try.
[18:00] <ScottK> It got reuploaded after that.
[18:00] <cjwatson> 2014-11-17 17:44:30 INFO Failed to parse changes file '/srv/launchpad.net/ubuntu-queue/incoming/upload-ftp-20141117-174344-029466/ubuntu/sddm_0.10.0+dfsg1-0ubuntu1_source.changes': GPG verification of /srv/launchpad.net/ubuntu-queue/incoming/upload-ftp-20141117-1
[18:00] <cjwatson> 74344-029466/ubuntu/sddm_0.10.0+dfsg1-0ubuntu1_source.changes failed: Verification failed 3 times: ["(7, 9, u'No public key')", "(7, 9, u'No public key')", "(7, 9, u'No public key')"]
[18:00] <cjwatson> Unsigned?
[18:00] <ScottK> Heh.
[18:05] <cjwatson> Hmm, that's quite a lot of rejections for the same reason around the same time.
[18:05] <cjwatson> There may have been a keyserver glitch.
[18:06] <ScottK> Don't sweat it over that one, I'd have had to reject it again anyway.
[18:06] <cjwatson> Only one for the primary archive, but eight for PPAs, all timestamped 17:44:33.
[18:06] <ScottK> I do think that's likely however, since the copy he posted on his web server was signed.
[18:07] <cjwatson> We've accepted stuff since then though.
[18:07] <ScottK> We used to have keyserver glitch rejections all the time, but it got better.
[18:07] <ScottK> I wonder if the design has regressed?