|
=== ccar_away is now known as ccarella |
|
=== ccarella is now known as ccar_away |
|
[02:36] <Avenger> is anyone there? |
|
=== ccar_away is now known as ccarella |
|
=== ccarella is now known as ccar_away |
|
[07:26] <darkxst> ricotz, you ok with landing g-i multiarch gir's? probably easier than reverting that on all packages |
|
[07:30] <ricotz> darkxst, this means you want to sync g-i itself too? i assume it won't breaks things while it fallbacks back to the old location |
|
[07:43] <Noskcaj> darkxst, Is that something we want to risk? |
|
[07:43] <darkxst> ricotz, yes it has fallbacks |
|
[07:48] <darkxst> hmm, though it might break gstreamer |
|
[07:49] <darkxst> based on comments in the debian changelog |
|
[07:51] <darkxst> but probably that only affects builds |
|
[08:02] <darkxst> Noskcaj, in the meanwhile can you fix tracker gir's |
|
=== ccar_away is now known as ccarella |
|
=== ccarella is now known as ccar_away |
|
=== ccar_away is now known as ccarella |
|
=== prth is now known as prth|away |
|
=== ccarella is now known as ccar_away |
|
=== ccar_away is now known as ccarella |
|
[19:02] <octoquad> Hi everyone :) |
|
=== prth|away is now known as prth |
|
[19:48] <Noskcaj> darkxst, What change does tracker need? |
|
=== prth is now known as prth|away |
|
[19:58] <Noskcaj> darkxst, Also, what version number should i use for pango1.0 and grilo after going back to syncing (after the gir reverts) |
|
[20:08] <Noskcaj> ignore all the above, i though we already synced gir |
|
=== ccarella is now known as ccar_away |
|
=== prth|away is now known as prth |
|
[20:26] <Jarli> Hi is anyone here familiar with gnome nanny? |
|
=== ccar_away is now known as ccarella |
|
=== prth is now known as prth|away |
|
=== ccarella is now known as ccar_away |
|
=== prth|away is now known as prth |
|
[22:03] <darkxst> Noskcaj, when/if we sync g-i, can just leave the ubuntu versions until there is a new debian version to sync |
|
=== prth is now known as prth|away |
|
|