| [02:04] <imgbot> === trainguards: IMAGE 293 building (started: 20141020 02:05) === | |
| [03:04] <imgbot> === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 118 building (started: 20141020 03:05) === | |
| === karni-eod is now known as karni | |
| [03:54] <imgbot> === trainguards: IMAGE 293 DONE (finished: 20141020 03:55) === | |
| [03:54] <imgbot> === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/293.changes === | |
| [04:19] <imgbot> === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 118 DONE (finished: 20141020 04:20) === | |
| [04:19] <imgbot> === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/118.changes === | |
| [12:08] <ricmm> bzoltan: so only 107+ ? 106 and 105 clean? | |
| [12:09] <ricmm> bzoltan: basically just want to know if 105 is broken, and if 107 is broken for you then try to roll back to qtdeclarative5-qtmir-plugin to 0.4.3+14.10.20141013-0ubuntu1 | |
| [12:10] <bzoltan> ricmm: yes, up until 106 it was OK and from 107 the UITK AP tests are broken | |
| [12:10] <ricmm> ok | |
| [12:10] <ricmm> in that case its the desktop file reader changes | |
| [12:10] <bzoltan> ricmm: I have not yet tried to roll back | |
| [12:11] <bzoltan> ricmm: do you know who yo talk for the fix? | |
| [12:12] <ricmm> bzoltan: dandrader, gerry, kgunn | |
| [12:12] <ricmm> but first do confirm with a rollback of qtmir | |
| [12:12] <ricmm> just to make sure the pinpointed version is correct | |
| [12:13] <bzoltan> ricmm: OK, so it is 0.4.3 | |
| [12:13] <bzoltan> ricmm: is it a trival downgrade? | |
| [12:14] <ricmm> bzoltan: apt-get install qtdeclarative5-qtmir-plugin=0.4.3+14.10.20141013-0ubuntu1 | |
| [12:15] <bzoltan> ricmm: cool, thank you ... doing it right now | |
| [12:34] <Saviq> davmor2, bug #1383277 | |
| [12:34] <ubot5> bug 1383277 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "Power dialog sometimes shown on resume" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1383277 | |
| [12:35] <popey> ooh, i have been seeing that too | |
| [12:35] <Mirv> bfiller: I published the rtm-002 now. | |
| [12:36] <bfiller> Mirv: thanks, would be great if we could respin a mako image with that | |
| [12:37] <Mirv> bfiller: I'll ping og_ra when it has migrated to release pocket | |
| [12:38] <Mirv> bfiller: I wonder if we should try to get it to utopic too? I'm not sure if those ubuntu-phone thread repliers are using rtm or utopic | |
| [12:39] <bfiller> Mirv: we should probably get it to ubuntu as well, I think the people were using rtm but we should to be safe | |
| [12:39] <popey> Saviq: davmor2 bug 1383279 | |
| [12:39] <ubot5> bug 1383279 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "power button events queued, should probably be dropped" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1383279 | |
| [12:39] <Saviq> popey, a | |
| [12:39] <Saviq> h | |
| [12:40] <Saviq> popey, reassigned to u-s-c | |
| [12:40] <Mirv> bfiller: ^ that 001 will have it, kicked build button. | |
| [12:46] <bfiller> Mirv: thanks | |
| [12:46] <bfiller> Mirv: could you create silos for line 56 and 57 when you have a chance? | |
| [12:55] <Mirv> ogra_: bill requested ^ above at least mako rtm image build, could you arrange it? the sim unlock problem seen on the mailing list would be now fixed. | |
| [12:56] <ogra_> i cant do a Mako only build | |
| [12:56] <ogra_> but i can indeed trigger an RTM image build | |
| [12:57] <Mirv> ogra_: yeah, that's what I thought. I guess that's important enough bug that it'd be nice to have a new image sooner. | |
| [12:58] <Mirv> hmm, I guess sil2100 is still stuck somewhere in Frankfurt or so :( | |
| [12:58] <ogra_> right, no issue with that | |
| [12:58] <ogra_> yup, i just saw his mail ... i think his new filght is in 2-3h | |
| [12:59] <ogra_> ... "I'm stuck here until the flight at 17:00 UTC+2" ... | |
| [12:59] <ogra_> even more | |
| [12:59] <Mirv> he didn't mail me, but I heard yesterday evening | |
| [12:59] <Mirv> that's terrible | |
| [12:59] * ogra_ is on the right MLs :) | |
| [13:00] <Mirv> ogra_: argh, not again... "aren't you on the xyz mailing list" | |
| [13:00] <ogra_> obviously LH screwed up his re-booking | |
| [13:00] <Mirv> I wonder if I should be on some more lists.. | |
| [13:00] <ogra_> Mirv, thats the internal foundations list ... i was on that team and didnt unsubscribe when i changed :) | |
| [13:00] <Mirv> hehe, right | |
| [13:03] <Saviq> jdstrand, hey, could we get your feedback on bug #1383086 please (also, is there a project we could add a task for to request security feedback?) | |
| [13:03] <ubot5> bug 1383086 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "rebooting defeats the screen lock timeout" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1383086 | |
| [13:37] <kenvandine> does anyone know why some autopkgtests aren't running? | |
| [13:37] <kenvandine> i have ubuntu-system-settings in proposed and excuses says there is a test running | |
| [13:37] <kenvandine> but it isn't... last run was a week ago | |
| [13:44] <pete-woods> trainguards: if I want to change my mind about the target of my landing (I want to do utopic, rather than rtm), what's the right way to do this? | |
| [14:10] <Mirv> pete-woods: you tell the line number and we'll change it :) | |
| [14:10] <Mirv> or I will, robru being at his home timezone and sil2100 stuck on Frankfurt airport... | |
| [14:10] <Mirv> pete-woods: so, I'd free up the rtm silo and assign utopic one instead | |
| [14:11] <kenvandine> Mirv, do you know why we have a bunch of packages stuck in proposed? | |
| [14:11] <kenvandine> Mirv, excuses says "test running" | |
| [14:12] <kenvandine> but they aren't running :) | |
| [14:12] <Mirv> kenvandine: in rtm or utopic? | |
| [14:12] <kenvandine> utopic | |
| [14:12] <Mirv> oh.. | |
| [14:12] <kenvandine> we have packages stuck migrating since friday | |
| [14:14] <Mirv> the answer to your question is "no" (do I know). we should probably ping pitti or someone else. | |
| [14:18] <cjwatson> ask on #ubuntu-release about such things. | |
| [14:19] <pete-woods> Mirv: yes, that would be awesome :) | |
| === renato is now known as Guest73089 | |
| [14:22] <popey> [D/query balloons | |
| [14:22] <popey> oops | |
| [14:36] <Saviq> Mirv, could we please have a silo for line 42 then, cleaned the utopic-targeted silo ↑ | |
| [14:57] <brendand> marcustomlinson, hey | |
| [14:58] <marcustomlinson> brendand: hey | |
| [14:58] <brendand> marcustomlinson, can we sit for a few minutes and look at your silo? | |
| [14:58] <marcustomlinson> brendand: yeah ok | |
| [14:58] <brendand> marcustomlinson, dallas right? | |
| [14:58] <marcustomlinson> brendand: yep | |
| [15:01] <Saviq> Mirv, http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1425 | |
| [15:02] <AlbertA> trainguards: line 28 (rtm landing-001) is ready for QA but it's not showing up in the trello queue any ideas? | |
| [15:13] <Mirv> pete-woods: the line number, please? :) | |
| [15:14] <Mirv> Saviq: on time, great!! | |
| [15:14] <Mirv> cjwatson: is vivid open yet? ;) | |
| [15:14] <pete-woods> Mirv: line 62 | |
| [15:15] <Mirv> pete-woods: oh right it didn't even have an assigned silo. ok then, 016. | |
| [15:18] <pete-woods> Mirv: sorry, that's a new line. the original one is 49 | |
| [15:19] <Mirv> pete-woods: thanks, freed the silo | |
| [15:20] <Mirv> (the line 49) | |
| [15:20] <bzoltan> ogra_: sir, where are you? | |
| [15:20] <Mirv> Saviq: rtm-015 | |
| [15:20] <ogra_> bzoltan, hmm, i thinnk its is called ballromm B | |
| [15:21] <cjwatson> Mirv: no :) | |
| [15:24] <popey> davmor2: bug 1383343 | |
| [15:24] <ubot5> bug 1383343 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "Application icons take a long time to load on slow network" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1383343 | |
| [15:24] <popey> dunno if we have one already filed for that, seems we should | |
| [15:26] <davmor2> popey: confirmed | |
| [15:33] <popey> davmor2: ta | |
| === Guest73089 is now known as renatu | |
| [16:25] <brendand> bzoltan, silo 13 isn't going to land this week you know | |
| === mihir_ is now known as mihir | |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | |
| [17:10] <robru> Mirv: are you at the sprint? | |
| [17:12] <robru> I'm around for any landing needs anybody might have | |
| [17:32] <rsalveti> davmor2: I got a silo that's ready for qa to sign it off, but it seems the spreadsheet is not showing that | |
| [17:32] <rsalveti> rtm silo 14 | |
| [17:45] <rsalveti> Saviq: hey, we want to land https://code.launchpad.net/~mfrey/unity8/lock-fix/+merge/238918 | |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | |
| [17:45] <rsalveti> Saviq: don't think we're landing more stuff into utopic anymore, so how to proceed with that landing? | |
| [17:45] <Saviq> rsalveti, I'm releasing trunk into rtm | |
| [17:45] <Saviq> rsalveti, I've a silo already, will take that in | |
| [17:46] <rsalveti> Saviq: awesome | |
| [17:47] <robru> rsalveti: fixed spreadsheet status of row 48 | |
| [17:47] <rsalveti> robru: thanks! | |
| [17:48] <robru> there it is ;-) you're welcome! | |
| [17:48] <brendand> AlbertA, which bug is silo 17 meant to fix? | |
| [17:48] <brendand> AlbertA, i don't see one mentioned in the changelog | |
| [17:49] <AlbertA> brendand: https://bugs.launchpad.net/media-hub/+bug/1378311 | |
| [17:49] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1378311 in qtubuntu-media "EndOfStream event not received when QML Video component is destroyed" [Critical,New] | |
| [17:50] <brendand> AlbertA, that's not going to land this week though | |
| [18:00] <AlbertA> brendand: I believe it was indirectly associated with a bug that was tagged 10-23 | |
| [18:00] <AlbertA> brendand: but let me check... | |
| [18:07] <Mirv> robru: yes! | |
| [18:07] <robru> Mirv: mmmm, how was the flight? /me is super jealous i didn't get to go | |
| [18:08] <Mirv> robru: yes, it's nice to have you around, since I'm walking around so much that my response time can vary. | |
| [18:08] <Mirv> robru: 1h late (+1.5h US customs queueing), but not too bad especially given how Lukasz is doing. | |
| [18:08] <Mirv> I was here at 10pm, which was ok. | |
| [18:09] <robru> yeah I saw lukasz' email, that's just brutal | |
| [18:11] <ogra_> something he cal tell his kids about :) | |
| [18:11] <ogra_> *can | |
| [18:12] <brendand> bzoltan, ping | |
| [18:12] <brendand> ogra_, what happened? | |
| [18:13] <ogra_> brendand, | |
| [18:13] <ogra_> oops | |
| [18:13] <ogra_> brendand, his original flight was overbooked and they screwed up the new booking | |
| [18:13] <ogra_> he should be in the air now (finally) | |
| [18:16] <robru> ogra_: landings are open, right? I can publish that? ^ | |
| [18:17] <ogra_> robru, i donkt think landings are open, no | |
| [18:17] <robru> hm, rsalveti published himself ;-) | |
| [18:17] <ogra_> but thats the sim lock fix, that has been discussed before ... | |
| [18:18] <rsalveti> yeah | |
| [18:18] <ogra_> (talking about rtm-008 and rtm-006) | |
| [18:18] <ogra_> not sure about the mess rsalveti made with rtm-002 | |
| [18:18] <ogra_> :P | |
| [18:18] <ogra_> :) | |
| [18:18] <rsalveti> it is ricmm's fault | |
| [18:18] <ogra_> as usual !! | |
| [18:19] <ogra_> robru, we actually planned to build an image once the 006 and 008 packages landed commpletely | |
| [18:20] <robru> ogra_: 6 and 8 aren't even started to publish yet, are they being reviewed still? | |
| [18:20] <ogra_> hmm, dunno, i thought Mirv had handled them this morning already | |
| [18:21] <ogra_> though i'm not sure if anything is allowed to land without QA signing off ... brendand ^^ ? | |
| [18:21] <robru> ogra_: unless they landed already and there's already two new landings in those silos? ;-) | |
| [18:22] <ogra_> magically with the same packages ? :) | |
| [18:22] <Mirv> ogra_: didn't sil write on Friday "This also means we will be unblocking landings through the CI Train now."? | |
| [18:22] <brendand> ogra_, no | |
| [18:22] <Mirv> ogra_: yes I published the mako sim unlock silo | |
| [18:22] <ogra_> Mirv, well, i think olli still only wanted landings for the critical bugfixes | |
| [18:22] <robru> yeah I read something about how landings were unblocked but since it's final freeze it's basically only critical fixes anyway | |
| [18:22] <ogra_> Mirv, and i think every landing needs QA signoff at this point in the release | |
| [18:23] <olli> Mirv, ogra_ is right | |
| [18:23] <olli> i.e. if on the list, good to land | |
| [18:23] <Mirv> ogra_: yes, only rtm14 critical of course | |
| [18:23] <olli> if not, then escalation to product team | |
| [18:23] <ogra_> olli, modulo QA signoff indeed :) | |
| [18:23] <olli> for exception | |
| [18:23] <ogra_> sine we want to keep brendand and davmor2 busy ;) | |
| [18:23] <Mirv> both today's fixes so far were for 2014-10-23 critical ones | |
| [18:23] <ogra_> *since | |
| [18:24] <Mirv> ogra_: right, so QA signoff simply to every landing.. | |
| [18:24] <ogra_> yeah | |
| [18:24] <Mirv> ricmm: that means I'm changing your "turn off backlight" silo to also requiring signoff | |
| [18:24] <ogra_> Qa might decide the landing is trivial enough to just let it through, but we should get their comment at least | |
| [18:24] <Mirv> and ken's system-settings and pete-woods's silo | |
| [18:24] <ogra_> Mirv, a bit late :P | |
| [18:25] <Mirv> oh... | |
| [18:25] <ogra_> (given it is already migrating) | |
| [18:25] <ricmm> :) | |
| [18:25] <Mirv> right :) | |
| [18:25] <olli> Mirv, checking the tags only is not sufficient | |
| [18:25] <olli> as anyone can set the tags and sometimes they get set by accident | |
| [18:26] <Mirv> and Saviq's unity8 landing | |
| [18:26] <olli> the list from my mail is the authoritive source | |
| [18:26] <ogra_> well, only landing team should set them ... (though indeed everyone can set them, the landing team simply needs to check twice) | |
| [18:26] <Mirv> olli: right.. so the 10/16 email. check. | |
| [18:27] <olli> Mirv, 10/23 ;) | |
| [18:27] <Mirv> olli: yes, 10/23 email sent on 10/16 :) | |
| [18:27] <olli> hah | |
| [18:27] <olli> I can see now how this gets confusing | |
| [18:28] <Mirv> Saviq: so, I can immediately see your unity8 landing has bugs listed not on the List, so they should be escalated if wanted in | |
| [18:30] <rsalveti> but we're not just accepting MRs for the bugs from that email | |
| [18:30] <rsalveti> afaik we're back in the game and landing criticals | |
| [18:30] <rsalveti> even if not for this deadline | |
| [18:31] <davmor2> ogra_: I'm so going to slap you into the middle of next month | |
| [18:31] <Mirv> rsalveti: reading olli above it sounds like only bugs from the e-mail, or would need contacting the product team | |
| [18:31] <rsalveti> doesn't make sense, we had that for one week only, for the purpose of that milestone | |
| [18:31] <rsalveti> olli: isn't that the case? | |
| [18:32] <ogra_> rsalveti, as i understood we only land what has been approved by olli, pmcgowan or vicotr ... and then only after QA signed it off | |
| [18:32] <rsalveti> as we're fixing the other critical bugs, and we want to land them | |
| [18:32] <rsalveti> ogra_: I thought that was only for the previous milestone | |
| [18:32] <olli> rsalveti, only what's on the list for 10/23 | |
| [18:32] <ogra_> (heh, vicotr ... victors evil russian brother) | |
| [18:32] <rsalveti> olli: why that? | |
| [18:32] <rsalveti> why did we decide to push the same requirements for 23? | |
| [18:33] <olli> rsalveti, ideally, we shouldn't fix bugs that aren't on the list, unless the list is wrong or there is a good opportunity | |
| [18:33] <rsalveti> olli: well, we have people enough to fix some other criticals | |
| [18:33] <rsalveti> same that happened last week | |
| [18:33] <ogra_> rsalveti, the bugs simply need to be sent to either of these three and be added to the list | |
| [18:33] <Mirv> yes, that's what Saviq said too, they have more people than bugs on the list | |
| [18:33] <rsalveti> we're just flushing them now | |
| [18:33] <rsalveti> ogra_: right, I don't understand why we need that | |
| [18:33] <Mirv> it does make sense to fix later critical bugs earlier | |
| [18:33] <rsalveti> we have the rtm14 bug list | |
| [18:33] <rsalveti> exactly | |
| [18:33] <olli> rsalveti, the intention is to reduce churn & regression risk | |
| [18:34] <rsalveti> if it's on the rtm14 critical list, let's land it | |
| [18:34] <ogra_> rsalveti, because they want to asses the risk for their product | |
| [18:34] <rsalveti> olli: but them we'll never fix every bug | |
| [18:34] <rsalveti> it's just a waste of time | |
| [18:34] <rsalveti> we should land every critical we have now | |
| [18:34] <rsalveti> as before | |
| [18:34] <rsalveti> anytime | |
| [18:34] <nik90> olli: is the rtm14 critical list public? Since I need to check if some alarm bugs are on that list which would affect user experience. | |
| [18:34] <rsalveti> we can't land on utopic, can't land criticals out of that list | |
| [18:34] * ogra_ doesnt care either way, i just know what was requested | |
| [18:34] <rsalveti> will just take vacations | |
| [18:35] <ogra_> in any case everything going into RTM needs QA signoff ... regardless of the list | |
| [18:35] <Mirv> nik90: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+bugs?field.tag=rtm14 | |
| [18:35] <olli> rsalveti, let's chat in the break | |
| [18:35] <rsalveti> olli: sure | |
| [18:35] <olli> rsalveti, vacation or improve test coverage or ... | |
| [18:35] <rsalveti> but I'm in favor of always landing critical fixes, sooner the better | |
| [18:35] <ogra_> olli, there are a good bunch of bugs that wont affect krillin but mako ... which we definitely want tto have fixed | |
| [18:36] <olli> rsalveti, I'd be with you if the overall number of bugs would go down | |
| [18:36] <nik90> Mirv: and If I need to request a bug to be on that list, do I ask olli and victorp? | |
| [18:36] <rsalveti> olli: but that's because we still have bugs | |
| [18:36] <rsalveti> ignoring that is just ignoring the reality that we have more bugs | |
| [18:36] <Mirv> nik90: so basically any bug that both has the tag "rtm14" and is Critical. then we have an these "touch-2014-10-23" milestones additionally, and this List we're talking about is about those subsets of the whole list | |
| [18:36] <rsalveti> the bug number will still increase for a while | |
| [18:36] <rsalveti> until it's stable | |
| [18:36] <rsalveti> we now have way more people using the product | |
| [18:36] <rsalveti> expect more bugs | |
| [18:36] <nik90> Mirv: ok | |
| [18:37] <Mirv> ogra_: what was the policy on adding 'rtm14' tag itself? | |
| [18:37] <ogra_> uh, i forgot | |
| [18:37] <bzoltan> brendand: pong | |
| [18:37] <Mirv> yeah, me too :P | |
| [18:37] <ogra_> heh | |
| [18:37] <ogra_> sil might know | |
| [18:37] <rsalveti> I just think we'll never ship if we keep this process as is | |
| [18:38] <rsalveti> but anyway, will complain in the corridor | |
| [18:38] <olli> :) | |
| [18:38] <Mirv> nik90: well, for now contact me or sil2100 when you've a bug that is critical (that part you can set yourself in your own projects) and that would also like to have the 'rtm14' tag. | |
| [18:38] <bzoltan> brendand: Is it because of the UITK or is there a generic freeze? | |
| [18:38] <nik90> Mirv: ack | |
| [18:38] <olli> Mirv, rtm14 is for you to express that this is relevant for the product | |
| [18:38] <rsalveti> we're only landing ones that already has a deadline, just not for 23 | |
| [18:38] <Mirv> nik90: ^ ok there you go, you can add rtm14 for your own project when you think it should be in the radar as a critical bug | |
| [18:39] <Mirv> olli: thanks. | |
| [18:39] <bzoltan> elopio: the AP failures are same with the qtdeclarative5-qtmir-plugin:armhf 0.4.4+14.10.20141013-0ubuntu1 | |
| [18:39] <rsalveti> postponing something that was originally for 30 just because we can't include it for 23 makes no sense | |
| [18:39] <rsalveti> made sense last week because of the reason of the deadline | |
| [18:39] <pmcgowan> rsalveti, you can, if its rtm and crit | |
| [18:40] <rsalveti> pmcgowan: olli said I can only land stuff on the 23 list | |
| [18:40] <pmcgowan> ok go yell at him then :) | |
| [18:40] <elopio> bzoltan: do you mean, the same +70 errors? | |
| [18:40] <Mirv> I think that was the plan :) | |
| [18:40] <rsalveti> pmcgowan: that's what I'm doing here | |
| [18:40] <rsalveti> :-) | |
| [18:40] <olli> pmcgowan, hey... | |
| [18:41] <brendand> bzoltan, the landings are restricted to ollis list | |
| [18:41] <bzoltan> elopio: yes | |
| [18:41] <pmcgowan> heh olli's list | |
| [18:41] <bzoltan> elopio: I have flashed the 118 image and downgraded that package. | |
| [18:44] <bzoltan> brendand: Well, obviously I am not happy for it. But can not do much I guess. I hope that the V queue will soon open and I can start landing there. | |
| [19:20] <ogra_> Mirv, so what about the SIM lock stuff ? i cant see it on the dashbaodr | |
| [19:20] <ogra_> wow, what a typo | |
| [19:21] <ogra_> Mirv, i would actually like to trigger an image build ( rsalveti wants one too) ... but i cant seem to find the SIM lock issue landing anywhere | |
| [19:23] <ogra_> ah, found it ... line 39 ... and it actually landed | |
| [19:23] * ogra_ triggers a build | |
| [19:23] <ogra_> imgbot, stunt | |
| [19:23] * imgbot rolls on its back and purrs | |
| [19:23] <ogra_> good :) | |
| [19:24] <olli> lol | |
| [19:25] <cjwatson> bzoltan1: Friday, hopefully | |
| [19:26] <bzoltan1> cjwatson: Friday is good, thanks | |
| [19:26] <cjwatson> not promising but we've managed to be up and running within a day of release before ... | |
| [19:27] <bzoltan1> sure, I totally understand | |
| [19:29] <imgbot> === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 119 building (started: 20141020 19:30) === | |
| [19:32] <Mirv> ogra_: yes, thanks! | |
| [19:33] <Saviq> Mirv, there actually *is* a DO_NOT_ADD_RTM option ;) | |
| [19:34] <Mirv> Saviq: oh, right, it is there! | |
| [19:34] <ogra_> WHY_DO_ALL_OPTIONS_SCREAM ? | |
| [19:34] <Saviq> ogra_, BECAUSE_THEYRE_IMPORTANT | |
| [19:35] <ogra_> AH_THAT_MAKES_SENSE_THEN | |
| [20:27] <robru> bzoltan: row 70 is missing something | |
| [20:27] <Mirv> robru: oops :) I added it | |
| [20:28] <Mirv> we're rapidly trying to get the MR in there. sorry for setting it as "Ready" | |
| [20:28] <Mirv> the battle for working wifi | |
| [20:31] <robru> Mirv: heh, no worries. | |
| [20:32] <bzoltan> robru: Mirv: ready :) | |
| [20:33] <robru> bzoltan: Mirv utopic 14 | |
| [20:37] <Mirv> bzoltan: building https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-014-1-build/81/console | |
| [20:38] <Mirv> zbenjamin: conflicts | |
| [20:39] <imgbot> === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 119 DONE (finished: 20141020 20:40) === | |
| [20:39] <imgbot> === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/119.changes === | |
| [20:39] <ogra_> wow | |
| [20:39] <robru> pete-woods: ^ I'm afraid to publish anything as I've been out for 2 weeks. what's up with silo 16? | |
| [20:39] <ogra_> that was really fast ! | |
| [20:40] <robru> hm | |
| [20:40] <davmor2> ogra_: that just means it didn't work and we now all have broken images right? | |
| [20:40] <ogra_> davmor2, well, blame rsalveti :P | |
| [20:41] <davmor2> rsalveti: it's all you fault!!!! | |
| [20:41] <kenvandine> davmor2, why can't it ever be your fault? :-p | |
| [20:42] <robru> wtfqueuebot | |
| [20:42] <davmor2> kenvandine: it is but most that I let stuff through that was broken by the devs :P | |
| [20:42] <Mirv> oh, not again, the 1min repeat queuebot thing | |
| [20:42] <ogra_> it *relly* wants to publish that :) | |
| [20:42] <ogra_> *really | |
| [20:42] <kenvandine> really | |
| [20:42] <robru> but but! | |
| [20:42] <robru> I remember the cause of that issue and the spreadsheet doesn't look like it has that problem right now! | |
| [20:42] <Mirv> it became fun when it was repeating three different landings every minute | |
| [20:44] <pete-woods> robru: I think it's ready (I mean I've tested it). but I don't know the rules about publishing.. | |
| [20:44] <robru> pete-woods: is it a critical bugfix? utopic is in final freeze ;-) | |
| [20:45] <pete-woods> robru: it is, yes | |
| [20:45] <robru> pete-woods: ok | |
| [20:46] <ricmm> :) | |
| [20:46] <ricmm> s'il vous plait | |
| [20:47] <robru> ricmm: rtm 2 | |
| [20:47] <ricmm> robru: thanks | |
| [20:47] <robru> ricmm: you're welcome | |
| [20:57] <davmor2> ogra_, rsalveti: why is this image never seeming to finish flashing? | |
| [20:58] <davmor2> ogra_, rsalveti: nevermind it just finished but my god that took a while :) | |
| [20:58] <rsalveti> davmor2: hahah | |
| [20:58] <rsalveti> I might be able to flash it tomorrow, will take a while to download it | |
| [20:58] <rsalveti> really slow | |
| [21:00] <cwayne> davmor2, got time for a custom tarball test tomorrow? only critical bug fixes I swear :) | |
| [21:00] <robru> somebody who knows stuff let me know if it's actually ok to publish silo rtm 14 | |
| [21:00] <davmor2> cwayne: Where's my fitbit damn you ? possibly depends when | |
| [21:00] <robru> or not | |
| [21:01] <Mirv> robru: yes, I just published it. so it is on the 10/23 List (on the mailing list), ie ok. | |
| [21:01] <robru> ah ok, thanks Mirv | |
| [21:01] <Mirv> "10/23 iteration planning" | |
| [21:01] <cwayne> davmor2, its in my room | |
| [21:02] <cwayne> i dont have a charger for it though :/ but i do have the dongle to sync it | |
| [21:05] <balloons> ogra_, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-touch-meta/+bug/1383479 | |
| [21:05] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1383479 in ubuntu-touch-meta (Ubuntu) "Remove autopilot from touch images" [Undecided,New] | |
| [21:05] <ogra_> olli, pmcgowan ^^^ we need to talk about this one | |
| [21:08] <olli> ogra_, ack, not sure I fully grasp the implications | |
| [21:19] <pmcgowan> ogra_, yeah, this week or next? | |
| [21:21] <pmcgowan> balloons, ^^? | |
| [21:26] <pmcgowan> ogra_, balloons although if it has a small footprint I suppose there is not so much urgency? | |
| [21:33] <ogra_> pmcgowan, it has a giant dependency chain | |
| [21:33] <ogra_> (it will remove quite a bit of python packages) | |
| [21:33] <pmcgowan> that sounds good | |
| [21:34] <pmcgowan> so we should do next two weeks | |
| [21:34] <ogra_> pmcgowan, but there is some risk in it, if people dont use out tools for testing but directly call autopilot for example | |
| [21:34] <ogra_> so we should do it early to asess possible fallout | |
| [21:34] <pmcgowan> ogra_, who might do that? | |
| [21:34] <pmcgowan> ok | |
| [21:34] <ogra_> pmcgowan, well, i know that the unity8 team calls AP directly during developemnt | |
| [21:35] <ogra_> (eaiser than always calling pahblet-test-run if you develop ) | |
| [21:35] <pmcgowan> ogra_, so maybe an email to the list to prep folks | |
| [21:54] <balloons> pmcgowan, thanks for commenting on it. Sorry, I was offline and missed the discussion | |
| [21:54] <balloons> ogra_, pmcgowan, the potential issues also arise from people depending on autopilot or a dependency without declaring it. It's unlikely but possible | |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | |