| === Anoia is now known as MissDee | |
| [11:54] <io2> sorry to disturb, but after changing my email (and confirming it), I can no longer log into launchpad / ubuntu one. Anybody around to help? | |
| [11:57] <io2> weird, old email address works | |
| [11:59] <io2> oh, how stupid of me, forgot totally about the ubuntu one separate id confirmation :) | |
| [11:59] <io2> solved! | |
| === karni is now known as karni-snack | |
| === karni-snack is now known as karni | |
| [14:31] <__marco> hello, I added a new email to my launchpad account but every time I send an email from that address I get an error: the command is not signed with an openpgp key | |
| [14:31] <__marco> before I did not need to sign the message | |
| [14:32] <__marco> why I get that error? | |
| [14:32] <geser> are you trying to manipulate bugs through the email interface or only add comments? | |
| [14:33] <__marco> I am trying to manipulate bugs | |
| [14:38] <geser> then you need to sign the message and AFAIK it was always so | |
| [14:47] <__marco> geser: Launchpad verifies incoming email by looking for a GNU Privacy Guard (GPG) signature by the sender, or a DKIM signature by a trusted sender domain, such as GMail | |
| [14:47] <__marco> geser: this is what exactly happened | |
| [14:48] <__marco> I switched from a gmail account | |
| === stokachu is now known as stokachu__ | |
| === stokachu__ is now known as stokachu | |
| === karni is now known as karni-afk | |
| === karni-afk is now known as karni | |
| [19:48] <teward> are PPAs i386/amd64 only, or has that changed? | |
| [20:02] <cjwatson> teward: by default; other architectures can be supported via emulation to some extent, but only on request | |
| [20:02] <cjwatson> (since lots of stuff fails that way and it's not worth the resources or confusion when it isn't actually needed) | |
| [20:02] <teward> cjwatson: typically it's just i386/amd64 though? | |
| [20:02] <cjwatson> most PPAs just have the default setup, yes | |
| [20:03] <teward> cjwatson: and I assume the other architectures being requested are looked at on a case by case basis? | |
| [20:03] <cjwatson> yes | |
| [20:03] <teward> (i.e. not always approved) | |
| [20:03] <cjwatson> it would depend on things like load yes | |
| [20:03] <cjwatson> our capacity has improved recently | |
| [20:04] <cjwatson> it won't really be ideal until we have native virtualisation for the non-x86 architectures though | |
| [20:04] <teward> right | |
| [20:33] <teward> cjwatson: i'm maybe blind here, but you or someon on the LP team with regard to PPAs is better qualified to answer - http://askubuntu.com/questions/533789/repackaging-deb-with-an-alternate-target - looks like they want to use a PPA for something, but IDK whether PPA(s) are capable of that | |
| [20:33] <teward> (sorry for a 30 minute lagtime between pings) | |
| [20:35] <cjwatson> teward: ok your response is way off base I'm afraid | |
| [20:35] <cjwatson> I'll answer | |
| [20:35] <teward> cjwatson: i deleted it | |
| [20:35] <teward> cjwatson: i misunderstood their question :0 | |
| [20:35] <teward> cjwatson: hence the ping | |
| [20:35] <teward> :) | |
| [20:37] <dobey> huh | |
| [20:37] <teward> cjwatson: to that end, I"m not sure they were precise enough with what they were trying to do, in their initial question. | |
| [20:37] <teward> (hence confusion) | |
| [20:38] <dobey> doesn't matter because it's not doable (and really, shouldn't be done) | |
| [20:38] <cjwatson> Nonsense | |
| [20:38] <dobey> you can upload binary packages to a PPA? | |
| [20:38] <teward> oop i started an argument, i think i'll just go back to beating the nginx packages with a stick :) | |
| [20:38] <cjwatson> Perfectly doable, it's just a cross-compiler | |
| [20:38] <cjwatson> That's not what's being requested! | |
| [20:39] <dobey> oh, well now it's more clear after the dits | |
| [20:39] <dobey> edits | |
| [20:40] <dobey> it just said "additional builds of binutils for other architectures" before | |
| [20:41] * dobey goes back to bashing his brains against online-accounts code | |
| [20:41] <cjwatson> I posted an answer | |
| [20:43] <teward> dobey: that's what confused me, initially | |
| [20:43] <teward> dobey: it DOES help when people actually say what they mean, rather than be ambiguous :) | |
| [20:44] <dobey> yeah, my first reading made me think he wanted to repack x86-64 builds as ia64 binaries | |
| [20:45] <teward> dobey: that's what i had thought as well | |