| === Guest69465 is now known as mfisch | |
| === mfisch is now known as Guest67039 | |
| === harlowja is now known as harlowja_away | |
| [10:59] <harmw> smoser: ping | |
| [13:00] <smoser> harmw, here. whats up? | |
| [13:00] <harmw> I'm working on some code to get the proper fbsd interfacename | |
| [13:01] <harmw> should be ready soon | |
| [13:01] <harmw> can you change the instance hostname in AWS? | |
| [13:28] <harmw> btw, don't nuke that instance since I'm debugging on it :p | |
| [13:35] <smoser> harmw, you can't change a hostname in aws | |
| [13:35] <smoser> i can give you another instance if that'd help. | |
| [13:38] <harmw> hmk | |
| [13:38] <harmw> so ip-10-0-0-158 is the current hostname? | |
| [13:38] <harmw> nah, I think that'll work | |
| [13:43] <smoser> harmw, wlel, http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/local-hostname would tell you | |
| [13:43] <smoser> but you seem to have no sane tools on that system (curl or wget) | |
| [13:43] <harmw> fetch :) | |
| [13:43] <smoser> i remember a time before ubuntu whne i liked to play with sharp pointy objects. | |
| [13:43] <harmw> :> | |
| [13:43] <smoser> rather than things that worked ;) | |
| [13:50] <harmw> smoser: https://code.launchpad.net/~harmw/cloud-init/amazon-fbsd-fixes/+merge/237595 | |
| [13:51] <harmw> come to think of it, it's only relevant for configdrive setups since that's the only case where the nic is even used :p | |
| [13:51] <smoser> hooray! | |
| [13:52] <harmw> but nonetheless, it's always better then just using 'some' hardcoded name :p | |
| [13:53] <smoser> harmw, oh, cause it reads that in interfaces. | |
| [13:53] <smoser> yeah, thats all slated to change | |
| [13:53] <smoser> where we'll get info on the mac and find it that way | |
| [13:54] <harmw> yea, it should indeed be some higherlevel solution | |
| [13:54] <harmw> but for now this'll do the trick | |
| [13:54] <harmw> if only hiren_ would wake up | |
| [13:54] <harmw> since he actually uses configdrive | |
| [13:55] <smoser> harmw, the only coments i have on that merge proposal is that you should in general re-use 're.' | |
| [13:55] <smoser> with re.compile | |
| [13:56] <smoser> but its fine. | |
| [13:56] <smoser> ie: | |
| [13:56] <smoser> for line in ... | |
| [13:56] <smoser> m = re.match('^\w+', line) | |
| [13:56] <smoser> is going to re-compile that regex | |
| [13:56] <smoser> where it could have used a cached version | |
| [14:03] <harmw> so -always- compiled regexes? | |
| [14:04] <harmw> ah, it's inside that for loop | |
| [14:04] <harmw> damn | |
| [14:05] <smoser> i dont know really about a good rule for when to do it and hwen not to | |
| [14:05] <smoser> but clearly in that case on the loop, you're wasting cpu. | |
| [14:06] <smoser> dont worry about it. | |
| [14:06] <harmw> well in this case I honestly overlooked my own loop | |
| [14:06] <harmw> stupid though | |
| [14:07] <harmw> else I would've used a compiled regex, since you told that on some other review a while back :) | |
| [14:37] <jaxxstorm> is this the right place to discuss cloud-init bugs? | |
| [14:38] <harmw> jaxxstorm: yes | |
| [14:38] <harmw> bring it on | |
| [14:39] <jaxxstorm> I'm using the phone_home module and it's failing because of SSL, but my URL is http:// and on port 80 | |
| [14:39] <jaxxstorm> output: | |
| [14:40] <jaxxstorm> https://gist.github.com/jaxxstorm/0b2f7b20718bcb462fc6 | |
| [14:40] <harmw> could you use paste.ubuntu.com or something please :) | |
| [14:41] <harmw> anyway, it says this is the url: http://foreman.hostname.com80/unattended/ | |
| [14:41] <jaxxstorm> yeah I've redacted the URL | |
| [14:41] <jaxxstorm> but basically it's http://foreman.companyurl.com:80/unattended | |
| [14:41] <harmw> ah, and that 80 is deliberatly without prepending :? | |
| [14:41] <jaxxstorm> yeah that comes from the foreman | |
| [14:42] <harmw> UrlError: [Errno 1] _ssl.c:492: error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify faile | |
| [14:42] <harmw> you're using a selfsigned cert? | |
| [14:43] <jaxxstorm> well my foreman instance does have a self signed cert | |
| [14:43] <harmw> exactly | |
| [14:43] <jaxxstorm> but it's also available on port 80 without SSL for callbacks | |
| [14:43] <jaxxstorm> so why would it even attempt to use SSL on port 80 with http? | |
| [14:43] <harmw> isn't foreman just redirecting (forcing) to use ssl? | |
| [14:44] <harmw> c-i won't just start SSL by itself | |
| [14:45] <jaxxstorm> if I call the exact same URL with curl it doesn't use SSL | |
| [14:45] <jaxxstorm> and doesn't redirect | |
| [14:47] <harmw> weird | |
| [14:48] <jaxxstorm> yeah | |
| [14:48] <jaxxstorm> in any case, is there a way to have it not verify the SSL cert? | |
| [14:48] <harmw> that's something smoser would know, though I think it is possible to import a custom CA | |
| [14:48] <harmw> which would make c-i accept the certificate aswell | |
| [14:49] <jaxxstorm> yeah I saw that module and I may go dow that route if needed | |
| [14:49] <harmw> it would be the most elegant solution :) | |
| [14:52] <harmw> smoser: could you accept the merger? | |
| [14:55] <smoser> merged. thanks. | |
| [14:55] <harmw> sweeeet | |
| [14:56] <jaxxstorm> okay, never mind, sorry guys | |
| [14:56] <jaxxstorm> < Status: 302 Found | |
| [14:56] <jaxxstorm> getting redirected to https | |
| [14:56] <jaxxstorm> :( | |
| [14:56] <harmw> I told you :P | |
| [14:56] <harmw> ah, you forgot curl -l | |
| [14:56] <harmw> *probably | |
| [14:56] <harmw> or actualy.. ah nvm | |
| [14:57] <jaxxstorm> I guess I can add the CA cert, but that'll be a pain | |
| [14:59] <smoser> jaxxstorm, you should probably be able to insert the ca cert in cloudconfig | |
| [15:00] <jaxxstorm> yeah I think I can | |
| [15:00] <jaxxstorm> does it rely on a package being present for CentOS? | |
| [15:00] <jaxxstorm> how does it add the cert? | |
| [15:00] <jaxxstorm> I want to make sure all the required packages are installed before I attempt it | |
| [15:00] <smoser> i think it shoudl all be contained in cloud-init (and usage of python-requests) | |
| [15:01] <harmw> cloudinit/config/cc_ca_certs.py: distros = ['ubuntu', 'debian'] | |
| [15:01] <harmw> would that mean it's not supported on RHEL? | |
| [15:03] <jaxxstorm> it seems that way... | |
| [15:03] <jaxxstorm> :( | |
| [15:04] <harmw> jaxxstorm: open up a bugreport, this is something worth adding I'd say | |
| [15:04] <jaxxstorm> would love to, where do I go? | |
| [15:04] <harmw> https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init | |
| [15:06] <jaxxstorm> done | |
| [15:06] <jaxxstorm> https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1378874 | |
| [15:10] <harmw> that module is currently using some Debian-specific stuff, but if the logic applies to RHEL it should be fairly easy to get it to support that | |
| [15:11] <jaxxstorm> thanks :) | |
| [15:12] <jaxxstorm> I'm cheating anyway | |
| [15:12] <jaxxstorm> runcmd: /usr/bin/curl -k <%= foreman_url('built') %> | |
| [15:13] <jaxxstorm> btw, the app is amazing, has really helped my provisioning process, so thanks! | |
| [15:14] <harmw> if foreman is redirecting you, you need a curl -L to follow the 30x | |
| [15:18] <jaxxstorm> ah, v. true | |
| [15:36] <smoser> jaxxstorm, hm.. i dont knwo. i'm not sure how specific that would be. | |
| [15:55] <smoser> harmw, harlowja_away https://github.com/cloud-init | |
| [15:55] <smoser> now to get source there. | |
| [16:54] <harmw> why? | |
| [16:54] <harmw> smoser: what's wrong with LP? | |
| [17:08] <harmw> btw, you may nuke that instance now | |
| [17:10] <smoser> harmw, ok. i'll kill instance | |
| === Guest67039 is now known as mfisch | |
| [17:10] <smoser> nothing wrong with lp, but want to have something on github for people to find it, and or to contribute. there. some people just more comfortable there. | |
| [17:11] <harmw> sounds legit | |
| === mfisch is now known as Guest72593 | |
| [17:12] <JayF> smoser: is the copy in git or bzr going to be canonical? | |
| [17:12] <JayF> I guess I could pick a better word | |
| [17:13] <harmw> :p | |
| [17:13] <JayF> I mean lowercase "c" canonical not uppercase "C" ubuntu | |
| [17:13] <JayF> :P | |
| [17:14] <smoser> :) | |
| [17:14] <smoser> JayF, i dont know. not thought of that yet. | |
| [17:14] <JayF> That's the most important thing to know, isn't it? | |
| [17:15] <JayF> split brain problem and all that | |
| [17:18] <smoser> yeah, its clearly important to know. | |
| [17:39] <harmw> +1 for keeping LP master :p | |
| [17:50] <JayF> +90001 for making it github | |
| [17:50] <JayF> you make it github and all the sudden you'll see more contributions from me | |
| [17:50] <JayF> that's for sure | |
| === harlowja_away is now known as harlowja | |
| [18:15] <harlowja> holy crap, github, woah | |
| [18:15] <harlowja> although the PR mechanism sux still | |
| [18:15] <harlowja> *imho | |
| [18:52] <gholms> On, the bright side, it means not having to use bzr. | |
| [18:53] <kwadronaut> heh | |
| [18:53] <kwadronaut> only the maintainer(s) have to take care of keeping everything in sync | |
| [18:55] <gholms> Yep | |
| [18:57] <kwadronaut> for git-git you can use hooks or send a message to github asking to mirror it (which means they'll pull in changes twice a day or so and it's more obvious for users that it's not the canonical one) | |
| [18:58] <kwadronaut> there's both bzr-git and git-bzr fwiw. besides that, i dislike both platforms. | |
| [18:58] <kwadronaut> (if we're shedding bikes, i'm taking part and now i'll run again) | |
| [19:02] <JayF> I paint my bikeshed git of any kind | |
| [19:02] <JayF> smoser: another option would be to put cloud-init in stackforge/ and use openstack processes | |
| [19:03] <JayF> smoser: I have no idea how you'd feel about that, but you'd get some quantity of testing infra for "free" | |
| [19:03] <JayF> smoser: plus you'd be more tightly integrated with one of your biggest users | |
| [19:41] <harmw> stackforge sounds cool | |
| [19:49] <smoser> JayF, this is true, and i've considered that before. but i'm not tied to openstack, and do not really want to be. | |
| [19:51] <harlowja> i'd have to lean towards not also, i've got about 3 stackforge projects and an oslo one, so i've been through it, i'm not sure its buying much for cloud-init that github + travis couldn't buy (i do personally like the gerrit that openstack has over pull requests, but this is a managable dislike) | |
| [19:52] <harlowja> although the stackforge one could have an interesting connection into the rest of openstack if that stackforge repo somehow got plugged into the image-building | |
| === Guest72593 is now known as mfisch | |
| [19:53] <harlowja> would be nice to have a new image-built when cloud-init review happens, and tested accordingly, thats like the true functional test that would be nice to have automated | |
| === mfisch is now known as Guest6813 | |
| [19:54] <harlowja> but if said thing doesn't exist ( JayF might know more about the image building stuffs that could be possible) then i'm not sure it matters, github, stackforge... | |
| === Guest6813 is now known as mfisch | |
| [19:55] <harlowja> i've had https://github.com/yahoo/Zake working with travis and for a project without ton of activity its worked out ok | |
| [20:02] <smoser> harlowja, i want an easy "patch image with cloud-init" for sure. | |
| [20:02] <smoser> but i dont think building the image from scratch is useful. | |
| [20:02] <harlowja> well scratch or whatever other mechanism that i believe the tripleo folks/ironic people are using | |
| [20:02] <smoser> and 'mount-image-callback' or libguestfs makes patching it in trivial. | |
| [20:02] <harlowja> sure | |
| [20:03] <smoser> http://ubuntu-smoser.blogspot.com/2014/08/mount-image-callback-easily-modify.html | |
| [20:03] <harlowja> be nice to have whatever that is part of the review 'check' pipeline | |
| [20:03] <smoser> this is ture, but openstack would specifically be better off using a "stable" cloud-init for testing (ie, grabbing latest ubuntu image). | |
| [20:03] <smoser> and probably even latest image of stable release. | |
| [20:04] <harlowja> :) | |
| [20:04] <harlowja> so the oslo program has done something sorta neat for that | |
| [20:04] <harlowja> it has a check pipeline that checks the existing (stable) and from source | |
| [20:04] <harlowja> so u can get early warnings from the source 'check' and still not affect users of 'stable' | |
| [20:05] <harlowja> ex @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126791/ (the gate-*-src-taskflow are testing this source version) | |
| [20:05] <harlowja> while afaik the other users of taskflow are not using that source version (but the last release thats avaialble) | |
| [20:07] <harlowja> so this could do something similar | |
| [20:14] <smoser> hm.. | |
| [20:14] <smoser> so that would seem like a 'nice to have' | |
| [20:14] <smoser> but stackforge would not seem like a requirement for that. | |
| [20:15] <smoser> in that they have "sources" that live other places. | |
| [20:15] <smoser> such as cloud-images.ubuntu.com or fedora.mirror.org/foo | |
| [21:03] <harlowja> smoser agreed | |
| [21:04] <harlowja> its not a requirement, but could be simpler to make happen (emphasis on could) | |
| [21:04] <harlowja> since we already have people here in this channel that work with openstack and the infra there | |
| [21:26] <harmw> openstack? what's that | |
| [21:26] <harmw> sounds scary | |
| [21:32] <JayF> I suspect if you moved cloud-init into stackforge/ you could easily convince people to help you get some of this testing working | |
| [21:32] <JayF> because of the large number of crossover between openstack devs/opers and cloud-init users | |
| [21:32] <JayF> I'm not saying *I* would (I owe this project other work already), but I'm saying people would :) | |
| === shardy is now known as shardy_z | |
| [21:44] <harlowja> JayF so that means u would? | |
| [21:44] <harlowja> lol | |