UbuntuIRC / 2014 /08 /24 /#juju-dev.txt
niansa
Initial commit
4aa5fce
[21:41] <thumper> morning folks
=== wallyworld_ is now known as wallyworld
[22:45] <thumper> hi waigani
[22:45] <thumper> wallyworld: morning
[22:45] <wallyworld> hey
[22:45] <waigani> thumper: hello
[22:45] <thumper> wallyworld: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1360286
[22:45] <mup> Bug #1360286: ppc64el and i386 unittests cannot find tools <ci> <regression> <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1360286>
[22:45] <thumper> wallyworld: my guess is axw's bootstrap refactoring
[22:45] <thumper> wallyworld: do you think we should revert or fix?
[22:46] <thumper> wallyworld: blocking CI
[22:46] <wallyworld> could be, i'll look if my network connection satys up long enough :-(
[22:46] <wallyworld> let me look first
[22:46] <waigani> thumper: checking the user exists I can only see an unexported func state.checkUserExists
[22:47] <thumper> waigani: what is this for?
[22:47] <waigani> thumper: AddEnvironmentUser
[22:47] <waigani> thumper: checking if user exists before adding it
[22:47] <thumper> waigani: ok, there are two main possibilities
[22:48] <thumper> waigani: 1) check at the apiserver level using state.User(name) to load the user
[22:48] <thumper> 2) look inside the actual state method to add an environment user
[22:48] <thumper> I'd probably prefer 2.
[22:48] <waigani> thumper: okay, also how do we tell if they are local?
[22:49] <thumper> waigani: the tag Provider method is "local"
[22:49] <waigani> thumper: thanks
[22:54] <wallyworld> thumper: the failing test can be removed since the logic has changed - i'll do a branch with it skipped to unblock ci and confirm with andrew and then remove it
[22:55] <thumper> wallyworld: cool
[23:15] <thumper> wallyworld: http://juju-ci.vapour.ws:8080/job/github-merge-juju/buildTimeTrend
[23:15] <thumper> wallyworld: FYI looks like Build #374 (21-Aug-2014 07:52:39) axw environ-bootstrap-upload-tools is the one that started big time changes
[23:22] <wallyworld> thumper: our build times have also been going up because tests are really unreliable and we now fail back to -p 2 most times
[23:22] <thumper> ah
[23:23] * thumper suggests that we only check once
[23:23] <thumper> fail faster if we are going to fail
[23:27] <wallyworld> trouble is the 2nd run normally works
[23:27] <wallyworld> but is much slower than with full parallelism
[23:28] <wallyworld> we just need to fix the freaking tests
[23:36] <thumper> wallyworld: agreed
[23:37] <thumper> the replicaset test seems to be overly fragile
[23:37] <thumper> and long
[23:37] <thumper> can we not force that out of our normal test run into something more suitable?
[23:37] <thumper> and write a robust test?
[23:37] <wallyworld> you would think so
[23:38] <wallyworld> also, jujud tests are horrible
[23:38] <wallyworld> and there's a failing uniter test