| [07:31] <Pali> hello, I have problem with importing svn repo into launchpad bzr (via launchpad auto import service)... for 5 days it trying to import svn repo every 30 minutes and something is not working | |
| [07:31] <Pali> bzr repo is still empty | |
| [07:31] <Pali> it is normal? | |
| [07:33] <Pali> here is repo: https://code.launchpad.net/~pali/llvm/llvm-3.5 | |
| [07:33] <wgrant> Pali: Subversion imports are done incrementally, a few thousand revisions at a time. | |
| [07:33] <wgrant> Something like LLVM has hundreds of thousands of revisions of history; it will take many attempts before it completely imports. | |
| [07:33] <wgrant> Ah, 500 revisions at a time, in fact. | |
| [07:35] <Pali> wgrant: so I just need wait more time? | |
| [07:35] <wgrant> Pali: Right. | |
| [07:35] <wgrant> Importing a large Subversion history can be very slow due to the nature of the protocol. | |
| [07:35] <Pali> ok | |
| [07:37] <Pali> looks like llvm has 216045 revisions, so it will take about 216045/500/2/24 ~= 9 days? | |
| [07:39] <Pali> wgrant: bzr repos from svn branches do not support stacked bzr? | |
| [07:39] <Pali> because there is already autoimporting llvm trunk branch into bzr (from svn), but not branch 3.5 | |
| [07:40] <Pali> and both branches have big same history | |
| [07:40] <wgrant> Pali: They do not. | |
| [07:40] <wgrant> Imports are always independent. | |
| [07:43] <Pali> ok | |
| [07:44] <Pali> thanks for info, I will wait 4 days and if there will be problem I ask again | |
| [07:44] <Pali> wgrant: another question: it is possible to check how many revs are imported now? | |
| [07:48] <wgrant> Pali: No, you'd have to estimate from the number of imports so far. | |
| [07:48] <Pali> ok | |
| [11:46] <jelmer> wgrant: imports should be stacked I think | |
| [11:46] <jelmer> wgrant: or did I have a branch for that that never landed? | |
| [11:54] <wgrant> jelmer: I know you had an incomplete branch at some point. I don't remember how far it got, except that it certainly doesn't work on the side of the importer. | |
| [11:55] <wgrant> They may be stacked on codehosting, but they're certainly independent on the importd intermediary. | |
| [11:55] <wgrant> And the latter is all that matters for performance. | |
| [11:55] <jelmer> wgrant: ah, yeah. That must be it. | |
| [11:55] <jelmer> codehosting does stacking, and my branch to use stacking on the importer never landed. | |
| [11:56] <jelmer> (I remember we had bugs with regards to stacking for code imports) | |