| [00:35] <jose> apachelogger: that on the doodle is just one meeting? | |
| [02:26] <valorie> congratulations ovidiu-florin! | |
| [03:06] <jose> right! | |
| [03:06] <jose> ovidiu-florin: congratulations! Hope everything went awesome! | |
| [03:33] <mitya57> shadeslayer: what Riddell says, also you are welcome to add ppa:mitya57/test2, upgrade and test. | |
| [03:34] <mitya57> (Please disable the ppa after upgrade, I like uploading broken packages there) | |
| [03:37] <ScottK> More fun if he doesn't disable it and wonders later why his computer is broken. | |
| [04:15] <ScottK> How can I do the equivalent of if [-e filename ]; then .... endif in GNU make? It seems I need ifeq and some thing, but what equals true? | |
| === Toadnohyp is now known as Hypnotoad | |
| [06:38] <lordievader> Good morning. | |
| [06:39] <soee> good morning lordievader | |
| [06:39] <lordievader> Hey soee, how are you? | |
| [06:40] <soee> lordievader: tbh fantastic :) you ? | |
| [06:40] <lordievader> Doing good. May I ask what made your day fantastic? | |
| [06:49] <soee> lordievader: new office :) | |
| [06:50] <lordievader> :) | |
| === soee_ is now known as soee | |
| === who_da_fly is now known as superfly | |
| [09:43] <shadeslayer> hi ho | |
| [09:52] <soee> hi shadeslayer | |
| [09:53] <ovidiu-florin> hello world | |
| [09:53] <ovidiu-florin> valorie jose thank you | |
| [09:56] <shadeslayer> hey soee | |
| [10:01] <Riddell> "Myriam Schweingruber (myriam) renewed their own membership in the Kubuntu Members (kubuntu-members) team" yay Mamarok still loves us! | |
| [10:03] <shadeslayer> eh, what, how does opengl work on arm64 but not on armhf? | |
| [10:03] <shadeslayer> -- Found OpenGL: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libGL.so | |
| [10:04] <Riddell> if you install it it'll work anywhere to compile, may run slow as treacle when you use it though | |
| [10:06] <BluesKaj> 'Morning folks | |
| [10:24] <Mamarok> Riddell: of course I do, how did you ever doubt that :) | |
| [10:25] <Mamarok> I am a trusty user since your first packages on Ubuntu :) | |
| [10:25] <Mamarok> and promote Kubuntu whenever I can | |
| [10:25] * Riddell beams with pride | |
| [10:26] <Riddell> W: libkf5codecs-data: unknown-locale-code x-test hah | |
| [10:26] <Riddell> agateau: I wonder if the release scripts should be adjusted to remove that ↑ | |
| [10:27] <agateau> Riddell: would make sense, ping dfaure about this | |
| [10:28] * agateau is off for lunch | |
| === who_da_fly is now known as superfly | |
| [10:29] <shadeslayer> oh oh oh | |
| [10:30] <shadeslayer> tsdgeos: please poke ScottK to accept kde-workspace 4.11.9 in trusty | |
| [10:30] <shadeslayer> tsdgeos: I've already solved your issue a day or two ago :P | |
| [10:31] <Riddell> shadeslayer: :) | |
| [10:36] <shadeslayer> uff, turns out my upload was rejected | |
| [10:36] <ScottK> Why? | |
| [10:36] <ScottK> Wasn't me. | |
| [10:37] <shadeslayer> no not you .. something else | |
| [10:37] <apachelogger> twas batman | |
| [10:37] <shadeslayer> ^^ | |
| [10:38] <Riddell> some days you just can't get rid of a bomb | |
| [10:41] <shadeslayer> ScottK: btw any thoughts on https://launchpadlibrarian.net/174680022/buildlog_ubuntu-utopic-armhf.kubrick_4%3A4.13.0-0ubuntu2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | |
| [10:41] <shadeslayer> i.e. what would be a fix for it apart from disabling kubrick for armhf | |
| [10:41] <ScottK> Port it not to use GL directly. | |
| [10:43] <shadeslayer> ScottK: so GL is supported on arm64 but not on hf? | |
| [10:43] <ScottK> shadeslayer: BTW, unless you're going to port it, make the architecture list !armhf and then your "exotic" archs are taken care of. | |
| [10:43] <ScottK> Yes | |
| [10:43] <shadeslayer> interesting | |
| [10:43] <shadeslayer> ScottK: yeah, that's what I was thinking | |
| [10:43] <ScottK> Supported in Debian on armhf too. That's an Ubuntu change. | |
| [10:44] <shadeslayer> :/ | |
| [10:45] <shadeslayer> ScottK: dpkg-source: error: `!armhf' is not a legal architecture string | |
| [10:45] <shadeslayer> so I guess I'll have to manually list every one :( | |
| [10:45] <ScottK> Hmm. I thought you could do that now. | |
| [10:45] <ScottK> I guess not. | |
| [10:46] <apachelogger> hm? | |
| [10:46] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: please post control | |
| [10:47] <shadeslayer> http://paste.ubuntu.com/7403832/ | |
| [10:49] <apachelogger> ah, that architecture field | |
| [10:49] <apachelogger> I don't think you can do it there | |
| [10:49] <apachelogger> also | |
| [10:49] <apachelogger> if you did that, then the package would not generate any binaries | |
| [10:49] <shadeslayer> ScottK: I also had a question about eglibc , the eglibc homepage says eglibc isn't maintained anymore | |
| [10:49] <shadeslayer> so why is ubuntu/debian still using it as default? | |
| [10:49] <ScottK> I know. | |
| [10:50] <ScottK> I assume infinity and the other GLIBC maintainers will sort it out. | |
| [10:51] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-customized-programs.html#s-arch-wildcard-spec | |
| [10:53] <apachelogger> so, I dunno | |
| [10:54] <apachelogger> personally I don't get why it would be any less than any though | |
| [10:54] <apachelogger> oh | |
| [10:54] <apachelogger> actually | |
| [10:55] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: you may want to exclude armhf from the build depends | |
| [10:55] <apachelogger> libglu1-mesa-dev [!armhf], libqt4-opengl-dev [!armhf] | |
| [10:55] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: but then kubrick won't build at all? | |
| [10:55] <apachelogger> that would also then make sense in my mind ^^ | |
| [10:55] <shadeslayer> and hence won't migrate | |
| [10:56] <apachelogger> -- This installation will have the extra features provided by these packages. | |
| [10:56] <apachelogger> sounds optional to me | |
| [10:57] <ScottK> shadeslayer: In any case, I don't see -workspace in queue for trusty. | |
| [10:57] <shadeslayer> ScottK: should be up | |
| [10:57] <shadeslayer> just uploaded it | |
| [10:57] <ScottK> shadeslayer: It'll only block migration if it built before. | |
| [10:57] <ScottK> there it is | |
| [11:01] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: ok, lets try your approach | |
| [11:04] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7403915/ | |
| [11:05] <shadeslayer> this is on amd64 though | |
| [11:06] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: ah yes, will need manual promotion then | |
| [11:07] <apachelogger> also tell upstream to learn to use cmake :P | |
| [11:07] <apachelogger> ye consider everything non-essential and let feature_summary fail depending on what you tell feature_summary to be essential | |
| [11:09] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7403947/ | |
| [11:09] <shadeslayer> that would work right? | |
| [11:13] <apachelogger> yes | |
| [11:13] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: dat changelog is shit tho | |
| [11:13] <shadeslayer> :O | |
| [11:13] <apachelogger> if I look at the diff I see that clearly the intention is that it does not dep on kubrick on armhf | |
| [11:13] <apachelogger> I do not know why | |
| [11:13] <apachelogger> and the changelog does not tell me why | |
| [11:13] <apachelogger> so, the changelog tells me something I can see anyway when looking at the diff :'< | |
| [11:14] <shadeslayer> fixed and pushed | |
| [11:39] <kubotu> ::workspace-bugs:: [1312806] Please update kde-workspace to 4.11.9 @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1312806 (by Kubuntu IRC Bot) | |
| [11:44] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: bug 1316563 did I break the "yo, you got no drivers" message we had? | |
| [11:44] <ubottu> bug 1316563 in kubuntu-driver-manager (Ubuntu) "Kubuntu driver manager shows nothing, even after refreshing driver list" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1316563 | |
| [11:45] <apachelogger> indeed, m_label never gets shown | |
| [11:47] <apachelogger> guis desperately need unit testing | |
| [11:49] <Riddell> hi sgclark | |
| [11:50] <sgclark> Riddell: morning | |
| === debfx_ is now known as debfx | |
| [12:00] <sgclark> Riddell: ok so I am doing ldd on all the shared libs in those two and so far all of them have them both | |
| [12:01] <Riddell> gosh | |
| [12:01] <Riddell> so may be unfixable | |
| [12:02] <Riddell> sgclark: which are the two packages again? | |
| [12:02] <sgclark> yeah both sides, all of declarative and two in gui | |
| [12:02] <sgclark> libqt4-declarative libqt4gui | |
| [12:05] <Riddell> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/plugins/accessible/libqtaccessiblewidgets.so seems to be the problem one | |
| [12:05] <Riddell> in libqtgui4 but needs both declarative and gui | |
| [12:06] <Riddell> sgclark: so options are a) to ignore it or b) to split out libqtaccessiblewidgets.so into a separate package and have libqt4gui recommend it | |
| [12:06] <Riddell> b) seems quite do-able but dunno if it's worth it | |
| [12:08] * ScottK wonders what mitya57 thinks. | |
| [12:10] <sgclark> Will do whatever you tell me to. | |
| [12:10] <Riddell> sgclark: give it a try | |
| [12:11] <sgclark> will do | |
| [12:21] <sgclark> Riddell: also libqt4-declarative: symbols-declares-dependency-on-other-package libqtdeclarative | |
| [12:26] * Riddell looks | |
| [12:27] <Riddell> sgclark: pastebin output of: head debian/libqt4-declarative.symbols | |
| [12:30] <sgclark> Riddell: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7404280/ | |
| [12:33] <Riddell> sgclark: second line should be http://paste.ubuntu.com/7404280/ | |
| [12:33] <Riddell> sgclark: second line should be "libQtDeclarative.so.4 libqtdeclarative #MINVER#" | |
| [12:33] <Riddell> hmm no | |
| [12:34] <shadeslayer> surely you mean libqtdeclarative4? | |
| [12:34] <Riddell> sgclark: second line should be "libQtDeclarative.so.4 libqt4-declarative #MINVER#" | |
| [12:34] <shadeslayer> that works too ^^ | |
| [12:34] <Riddell> sgclark: I guess that change came from debian, check the changelog if there's a reason for it but if not go with "libQtDeclarative.so.4 libqt4-declarative #MINVER#" | |
| [12:35] <sgclark> ok thank you | |
| [12:56] <shadeslayer> Riddell: FYI I'm tracking merges on https://notes.kde.org/p/kubuntu-ninjas | |
| [13:00] <Riddell> shadeslayer: cool | |
| [13:36] <shadeslayer> Riddell: ScottK should I drop the extra packages from http://paste.kde.org/p9e8ujozp | |
| [13:37] <shadeslayer> extra = everything not libplasma-dev | |
| [13:38] <apachelogger> yofel: neon5 orchestration has been reorganized and now lives at lp:~neon/project-neon5/orchestration/ ... and all bits should be there to replicate the setup we run on a bluesystems server | |
| [13:38] <apachelogger> albeit, I am being lazy and haven't actually documented much, so you better hope I don't get hit by a bus :P | |
| [13:38] <yofel> sweet | |
| [13:41] <Riddell> shadeslayer: drop because we're after LTS? | |
| [13:41] <shadeslayer> yep | |
| [13:42] <Riddell> shadeslayer: yes, unless the replace/breaks is also in debian | |
| [13:42] <shadeslayer> right, ofcourse | |
| [13:45] <shadeslayer> we last merged kdelibs in 2009 :S | |
| [13:46] <apachelogger> that doesn't seem right, didn't we pick up a whole pile of splitting? | |
| [13:46] <apachelogger> that certainly was after 2009 | |
| [13:46] <Riddell> yes I'm sure I merged it last year when in that sunny place north of barcelona | |
| [13:50] <Quintasan> Any ideas why libqt5webkit5 is 5.1 when there rest of Qt 5.2 ? | |
| [13:51] <shadeslayer> ah yeah, I see another one in 2013 now | |
| [13:51] <ScottK> Ask mitya57 or mirv. | |
| [13:51] <Quintasan> ScottK: Okay, I wanted to package otter for now but I can't :S | |
| [13:51] <apachelogger> Quintasan: I think there were regressions in 5.2 | |
| [13:51] <ScottK> Quintasn: or just merge from Debian and don't sweat it. | |
| [13:52] <Quintasan> Utopic chain is up? | |
| [13:52] <ScottK> Has been for a while. | |
| [13:53] <Riddell> Quintasan: they found some regressions in 5.2 so kept it at 5.1+a load of backports | |
| [13:54] <Quintasan> ScottK: Looks like it, I already have a toolchain on my desktop | |
| [13:54] * Quintasan is so forgetful | |
| [13:54] <Quintasan> Riddell: Thanks. | |
| [13:55] <ScottK> Riddell time to move forward though. | |
| [13:55] <Riddell> hope so | |
| [14:06] <shadeslayer> btw any recommendations for this conflict : debian symbols file for libkio is older , but has more symbols as compared to ours which is newer | |
| [14:06] <shadeslayer> should I just copy over the one from debian and adjust ours during the first build? | |
| [14:06] * apachelogger scratches head and wonders how that even happens | |
| [14:06] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: maybe just redo the symbols file ^^ | |
| [14:07] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: start from debian I guess | |
| [14:07] <apachelogger> it's peculiar that ours would have fewer symbols tho | |
| [14:07] <apachelogger> unless there's arch specific ones | |
| [14:08] <shadeslayer> yeah, my plan was, copy over debian one, adjust as required during build | |
| [14:08] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: I see armhf symbols | |
| [14:08] <shadeslayer> which are not in our symbols file | |
| [14:08] <apachelogger> well | |
| [14:09] <apachelogger> it's a crap situation | |
| [14:09] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: the best results would be to continue using ours and perhaps find out why we are missing symbols | |
| [14:09] <shadeslayer> actually, wait, maybe .. yeah , reading it the wrong way | |
| [14:09] <shadeslayer> nvm me | |
| [14:09] <apachelogger> the thing is... since symbols have their introducing version noted you'd loose metadata unless you continue using our symbols file | |
| [14:10] <shadeslayer> but yeah, it'd be nice to know what to do in such a situation | |
| [14:11] <Elv1313> is there a way to fix this backtrace? https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/96becd9a35ea3f1b2a5841dd058629ecf20c5673 ? an user had it again yesterday and it is failing to produce an userful bt | |
| [14:12] <shadeslayer> Elv1313: no backtrace, can't do anything | |
| [14:13] <Elv1313> shadeslayer: I know, I am asking if there is something I can do to "fix" my code so a backtrace will be produced correctly. I don't like seeing crash report and doing nothing ;) | |
| [14:14] <shadeslayer> Elv1313: not really, you could ask the user to acquire core dumps | |
| [14:14] <shadeslayer> then debug on your machine | |
| [14:14] <Elv1313> is it possible to contact them? | |
| [14:15] <shadeslayer> via e.u.c ? nope | |
| [14:16] <apachelogger> !info sflphone | |
| [14:16] <ubottu> Package sflphone does not exist in saucy | |
| [14:16] <shadeslayer> saucy :O | |
| [14:16] <apachelogger> saucy he said | |
| [14:16] * shadeslayer hates merging kdelibs | |
| [14:16] <Elv1313> !info sflphone-kde | |
| [14:16] <ubottu> Package sflphone-kde does not exist in saucy | |
| [14:17] <apachelogger> Elv1313: you could ask ev in #ubuntu-devel if there's any more information on why the retracing failed, because it appears to me that the debug symbols should have been there | |
| [14:17] <Elv1313> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sflphone | |
| [14:17] <apachelogger> otherwise, if you wait long enough it might just be that a retrace eventually yields a trace ^^ | |
| [14:18] <Elv1313> ok, thanks | |
| [14:35] <shadeslayer> ScottK: I have another kde-workspace upload for you btw | |
| [14:35] <shadeslayer> in about 30 minutez | |
| [14:43] <davmor2> shadeslayer: man you so street with your z's ;) | |
| [14:43] <shadeslayer> xD | |
| [14:43] <shadeslayer> genuine typo btw :P | |
| [14:43] <shadeslayer> debfx: ping | |
| [14:43] <shadeslayer> debfx: +override_dh_makeshlibs: | |
| [14:43] <shadeslayer> + $(overridden_command) -- -c0 | |
| [14:43] <davmor2> shadeslayer: :D | |
| [14:43] <shadeslayer> debfx: any ideas why ou did that? | |
| [14:44] <mitya57> Quintasan, ScottK: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2014/05/03/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t09:32 | |
| [14:45] <mitya57> In short: it is already in Bzr, and Timo wants to synchronize it with Touch stuff | |
| [14:45] <shadeslayer> debfx: ideally, don't we want that in pkg-kde-tools to make sure if that there's no tolerance towards new symbols? | |
| [14:45] <shadeslayer> oh | |
| [14:45] <shadeslayer> debfx: level 0 never fails :O | |
| [14:45] <shadeslayer> why is kdelibs level 0? | |
| [14:46] <yofel> so we can fix the whole package post-build, instead of it failing on symbols, then later you have to fix new files etc. in another pass | |
| [14:47] <yofel> although we don't do that for all packages, nor am I sure whether it's that useful these days as LP does the building | |
| [14:47] <debfx> shadeslayer: I added that? :O | |
| [14:48] <shadeslayer> debfx: bzr log -p shows that rev 342 added that | |
| [14:48] <ubottu> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/?rev=342&view=rev | svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/trunk -r 342 | |
| [14:48] <shadeslayer> ah ubottu, u so silly | |
| [14:48] <shadeslayer> yofel: thoughts on dropping it? | |
| [14:51] <yofel> well, depends. It's useful as it doesn't block the rest of the SC on a kdelibs ABI break (possibly private/gcc), but on the other hand if it's gone you don't have to rebuild stuff if you bump the ABI later as everything is waiting | |
| [14:51] <yofel> I would rather not have it personally | |
| [14:52] <debfx> shadeslayer: likely came from Debian since that commit is a merge | |
| [14:52] <shadeslayer> mm | |
| [14:53] <shadeslayer> debfx: yeah, you're right | |
| [14:53] <debfx> it already was that way before: -DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_ALL := -V -u-c0 | |
| [14:54] <debfx> but I agree -c0 shouldn't be used for kde4libs | |
| [14:54] * shadeslayer removes it since debian removed it | |
| [14:59] <shadeslayer> ScottK: kde-workspace for your approval | |
| [15:03] <mitya57> Riddell: (/me reads backscroll) So is there anything wrong with the current libqt4-declarative.symbols? | |
| [15:04] <Riddell> mitya57: nope, just in what sgclark ended up with | |
| [15:04] <mitya57> Are you using lp:~k-packagers/k-packaging/qt or something else? | |
| [15:05] <Riddell> mitya57: I don't know if she started with that or with the trusty package | |
| [15:06] <mitya57> sgclark: ^ | |
| [15:07] <mitya57> Riddell: In my branch that symbols file was correct from the beginning, and there is no loop between gui and declarative. | |
| [15:08] <mitya57> (where "my branch" = lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/qt) | |
| [15:11] <sgclark> I used grab merge. I had to create symbols files to fix a different error. | |
| [15:12] <sgclark> But even so I had the circular error prior to that | |
| [15:47] <shadeslayer> my head hurts from the kdelibs merge :( | |
| [15:48] <shadeslayer> and I still have to deal with symbols | |
| [15:50] <sgclark> my brain has melted from qt4 merge, but finally done. | |
| [15:51] <mitya57> sgclark: Hi, can you please show me your qt4 code? Or, even better, commit it to Bzr? | |
| [15:53] <sgclark> mitya57: I am only packaging a merge. I do not have bzr access to that. I will have a my dropbox link here in a sec | |
| [15:53] <sgclark> the circular dependency is resolved though | |
| [15:54] <mitya57> I am asking because: <mitya57> In my branch that symbols file was correct from the beginning, and there is no loop between gui and declarative. | |
| [15:54] <yofel> sgclark: you can just commit locally and push to a private branch | |
| [15:54] <mitya57> I.e., maybe it is better if we take my code as a base | |
| [15:56] <sgclark> This is a merge with debian which is a newer version, What version are you using? | |
| [15:57] <mitya57> sgclark: What I prepared was also a merge with Debian. | |
| [15:58] <shadeslayer> http://paste.kde.org/pyqgmkbpl | |
| [15:58] <mitya57> I'm also a co-maintainer of Qt in Debian :) | |
| [15:58] <sgclark> That is wonderful, why am I merging it lol | |
| [15:58] <mitya57> (My bad that I didn't coordinate it before committing.) | |
| [15:59] <sgclark> Riddell: ^^ | |
| [16:00] * BluesKaj wonders if the word mistake is no longer cool ...my bad this, my bad that .... | |
| [16:00] <sgclark> Oh well, it was a good learning experience. If you have merged it already, there is no point messing with mine. | |
| [16:00] <mitya57> sgclark: In any case, please show me your code, maybe you've done some parts better than I. | |
| [16:01] <sgclark> thanks mitya57 | |
| [16:01] <Riddell> sgclark: yeah let us see what you have and we'll grab the best bits of both | |
| [16:01] <shadeslayer> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kdelibs/revision/586 | |
| [16:01] <shadeslayer> incase someone wants to review | |
| [16:02] <sgclark> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/p8hlhv9lztlyyjl/4RjZyLGlfY/kubuntu-files | |
| [16:02] * mitya57 looks | |
| [16:02] <sgclark> Riddell: anything left for me withh frameworks? | |
| [16:04] <Riddell> sgclark: loads http://qa.kubuntu.co.uk/kf5-status/build_status_4.99.0_trusty.html | |
| [16:04] <Riddell> https://notes.kde.org/p/kubuntu-ninjas-frameworks | |
| [16:07] <ScottK> shadeslayer: please reupload using -v. | |
| [16:07] <shadeslayer> ScottK: I did? | |
| [16:07] <shadeslayer> which is why it has both the 0.1 and 0.2 entry? | |
| [16:08] * ScottK checks again. | |
| [16:08] <Riddell> sgclark: a lot of them have had translations added and need qttools5-dev, qttools5-dev-tools, qt5-default added and a -data package added | |
| [16:08] <shadeslayer> ScottK: http://paste.kde.org/p7dnbc8gt | |
| [16:08] <shadeslayer> is what I have | |
| [16:08] <sgclark> Riddell: ok | |
| [16:09] <Riddell> sgclark: and some of the paths have been changed | |
| [16:09] <ScottK> shadeslayer: Sorry. Misread. Accepted. | |
| [16:09] <shadeslayer> ScottK: thx :) | |
| [16:11] <mitya57> sgclark: To be honest, my branch looks better to me :) As an example, you for some reason removed aarch64 & ppc64el patches from series, and they don't apply cleanly. | |
| [16:11] * Riddell out | |
| [16:13] <sgclark> mitya57: removed because they would not apply. I am still learning and qt4 was a monster to me. I have fought with this for many days and so I accept the fact that it is all probably a waste. | |
| [16:13] <mitya57> sgclark: There is at least one thing that you noticed but I did not | |
| [16:13] <mitya57> (and that thing is a changelog entry for 4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2ubuntu4) | |
| === pcwhite is now known as PaulW2U | |
| [16:28] <mitya57> Riddell: pushed that bit to Bzr (actually it was not just changelog entry, but half of upload). Now it should be ready. | |
| [16:41] <mitya57> sgclark: your code *was* helpful | |
| [16:46] <sgclark> mitya57: thank you. as for the patches I dropped because they ould not apply, what should I have done? For the future of learning :) | |
| [16:52] <mitya57> sgclark: They did not apply because we (Lisandro PM and I) forwarded some bits upstream. After removing those bits, the patch applies. | |
| === jmux_ is now known as jmux | |
| [16:52] <mitya57> Check what I've done in Bzr | |
| [16:52] <sgclark> mitya57: ok. will do thank you | |
| [18:15] <kdeuser56> yofel, hi, does project neon have debug symbols for all packages? | |
| [18:15] <yofel> any package should have a <pkg>-dbg as long as it has binaries | |
| [18:16] <kdeuser56> ok thanks | |
| [18:16] <kdeuser56> yofel: there are still packages for the kde 4 based stuff right? | |
| [18:16] <yofel> not really, there are for saucy, but for trusty it's rather broken | |
| [18:17] <kdeuser56> thats bad ... then I have to compile the whole kdepim stack myself :-( | |
| [18:17] <sgclark> Is anyone else working on https://notes.kde.org/p/kubuntu-ninjas-frameworks? I seem to be working on packages that are already being worked on again... | |
| [18:21] * yofel isn't | |
| [18:21] <yofel> kdeuser56: there's kdesrc build, which should make that rather easy | |
| [18:21] <yofel> it's even in the archive | |
| [18:21] <kdeuser56> yofel: yeah it is ... but it takes a long time | |
| [18:34] <Etriaph> G'day folks. | |
| [18:35] <Etriaph> ovidiu-florin: I can't post a question in the support forums for Evolve unless the theme has been purchased. I did send them an email using their contact form with the details of the scenario. | |
| [18:41] <apachelogger> mh, aren't council elections supposed to be held in may btw? | |
| [19:04] <sgclark> Anyone available to review kcompletion and kjobwidgets in bzr? | |
| [19:19] <Riddell> apachelogger: yep, we should discuss that at the meeting on monday | |
| [19:20] <Riddell> sgclark: yep (probably) | |
| [19:21] <sgclark> Riddell: yep probably what? :) | |
| [19:21] <Riddell> sgclark: probably can review | |
| [19:21] <sgclark> oh ok, great, ki18n will done here shortly as well | |
| [19:23] <Riddell> sgclark: all the packages are in the PPA just most of them need fixes | |
| [19:24] <Riddell> sgclark: I just did a mass upload to start which is also in bzr, but that's just adding a changelog | |
| [19:24] <Riddell> so new paths, translations and other things need fixed | |
| [19:24] <sgclark> Riddell: right, I am grabbing them from PPA | |
| [19:24] <Riddell> ppa and bzr should be the same | |
| [19:24] <sgclark> and fixing. kcompletion was only one that had some changes done in bzr | |
| [19:26] <Riddell> oh yes sorry I see I did half start that and then forgot about it :( | |
| [19:27] <sgclark> hehe it's ok | |
| [19:28] <Riddell> sgclark: you removed the top of the changelog in kcompletion | |
| [19:28] <sgclark> Riddell: I did? was not intentional | |
| [19:30] <sgclark> Riddell: ki18n ready | |
| [19:31] <sgclark> That is all the reds, want me to retry the dependency waits when these build? | |
| [19:31] <Riddell> sgclark: yeah please | |
| [19:31] <sgclark> will do! | |
| [19:32] <sgclark> I will list any I work on in the sheet , as you will be awake before me tomorrow :) | |
| [19:37] <Riddell> sgclark: uploaded your three packages | |
| [19:37] <Riddell> sgclark: I also committed my incomplete changes for kauth to bzr so you can complete that if you so wish | |
| [19:42] <sgclark> Riddell: will do | |
| [19:50] <Elv1313> shadeslayer, apachelogger: Hi again, about my unusable e.u.c backtraces pronlem, I made a script that transform incomplete e.u.c backtraces into usable ones https://gist.github.com/Elv13/76aac9356171de13e352 It does a good enough job to solve most problems | |
| [20:40] <sgclark> Riddell: or anyone available kauth ready in bzr | |
| [20:43] <jose> Riddell: we don't have pressed Kubuntu DVDs anymore, right? | |
| [20:46] <shadeslayer> nope | |
| [20:46] <jose> kinda sad :( | |
| [20:47] <jose> some guy asked for a Kubuntu DVD to be shipped (I ship DVDs in my country) and for any weird reason *all* my DVDs and burners decided to fail | |
| [20:48] <shadeslayer> heh | |
| [20:48] <shadeslayer> jose: though I guess you can order one from the Canonical store, maybe | |
| [20:48] <jose> they don't sell kubuntu ones anymore :( | |
| [20:48] <shadeslayer> hm, nope | |
| [20:48] <jose> and the Ubuntu Desktop and Server ones I already got | |
| [20:49] <shadeslayer> they finally do have properly priced tshirts | |
| [20:49] <jose> really?! | |
| [20:49] <shadeslayer> yeah, 10 GBP | |
| [20:49] <shadeslayer> http://shop.canonical.com/index.php?cPath=14 | |
| [20:49] <jose> oh, but I'm sure shipping is 3x the price of the shirt | |
| [20:50] * shadeslayer checks | |
| [20:51] <jose> hmm, shipping to Peru: 6.50 GBP for a tshirt | |
| [20:51] <jose> Expedited, arriving in 1 week: 39.42 GBP | |
| [20:51] <shadeslayer> shipping within GB is 5 GBP | |
| [20:51] <jose> Express, arriving in 5 days: 120.32 GBP | |
| [20:51] <shadeslayer> shipping to Spain is 7-8 | |
| [20:51] <shadeslayer> heh :P | |
| [20:51] <jose> I think I'll choose... Express | |
| [20:52] <shadeslayer> xD | |
| [21:14] <Riddell> sgclark: kauth uploaded! | |
| [22:19] <sgclark> Riddell: or anyone available kservice is ready in bzr | |