| === sz0 is now known as sz0` | |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | |
| === zz_nhayashi is now known as nhayashi | |
| === sz0` is now known as sz0 | |
| === sz0 is now known as sz0` | |
| === nhayashi is now known as zz_nhayashi | |
| [05:20] <pitti> Good morning | |
| === zz_nhayashi is now known as nhayashi | |
| === nhayashi is now known as zz_nhayashi | |
| === zz_nhayashi is now known as nhayashi | |
| [07:05] <dholbach> good morning | |
| [07:49] <zyga> good morning | |
| === xnox is now known as NoNameYet_xnox | |
| === Chipaca is now known as UtilitarianUvula | |
| [08:27] <pitti> ogra_: we dropped/will drop support for the Galaxy Nexus, right? i. e. is it ok to drop the workaround for bug 1234743? | |
| [08:27] <ubottu> bug 1234743 in systemd (Ubuntu Trusty) "omapfb module floods system with udev events on samsung galaxy nexus" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1234743 | |
| [08:27] <ogra_> pitti, we dont build device images for it anymore, might have stopped booting with some recent changes | |
| [08:28] <pitti> ogra_: ack, thanks | |
| [08:28] <ogra_> so yes, if it helps, drop it | |
| [08:28] <ogra_> pitti, note that either the meizu or bq have PVR chipsets though, we might need it back we we are unlucky | |
| [08:29] <pitti> ogra_: ah, ok; well, it's in git, if we see those produce uevents like mad we can adjust it to those | |
| [08:30] <ogra_> right, just dont throw it away :) | |
| === psivaa-afk is now known as psivaa | |
| === sz0` is now known as sz0 | |
| === UtilitarianUvula is now known as Chipaca | |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | |
| === apachelogger is now known as apachelogger_ | |
| === apachelogger_ is now known as apachelogger | |
| === mpt_ is now known as mpt | |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | |
| === andyrock is now known as andyrock-lunch | |
| [12:56] <pmcgowan> bregma, any progress on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1307701 | |
| [12:56] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1307701 in unity (Ubuntu) "Unity does not get touch events when SDK apps running" [High,Confirmed] | |
| [12:56] <bregma> pmcgowan, can't say I spent the last-minute release crush and the holidays working on it, so no progress yet | |
| [12:57] <pmcgowan> bregma, ok, didnt know if it was assigned off to someone to look at | |
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | |
| [14:52] <bdmurray> pitti: Could you please review https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/apport/retrace-package-versions/+merge/210308? | |
| [14:53] <bdmurray> mvo_: Could you have a look at bug 1309386? | |
| [14:53] <ubottu> bug 1309386 in unity-control-center (Ubuntu) "System details page not aware of phased-updates" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1309386 | |
| [14:54] <mvo_> bdmurray: sure | |
| [14:54] <bdmurray> mvo_: thanks | |
| === wedgwood is now known as Guest26994 | |
| === wedgwood1 is now known as wedgwood | |
| === tkamppeter__ is now known as tkamppeter | |
| [15:34] <tedg> ev, So charles and I have some code for reporting recoverable problems that we've cut-and-pasted a few places, we're thinking it should go in a lib somewhere. Do you have a good place to put that? | |
| [15:35] <cjwatson> /wg 53 | |
| [15:35] <cjwatson> sorry | |
| [15:41] <ev> tedg: libwhoopsie? | |
| [15:41] <ev> tedg: and thanks to the both of you for taking on that work | |
| [15:42] <tedg> ev, Heh, it's fun filling bugs on other people ;-) | |
| [15:42] <ev> I have so little time for whoopsie and apport these days. It's encouraging to know that other people are stepping up | |
| [15:42] <ev> lol | |
| [15:44] <jibel> mvo_, when you have time could you have a look at bug 1296629 ? I cannot reproduce with the clone, but the upgrade path is different. | |
| [15:44] <ubottu> bug 1296629 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu 14.04 partial upgrade error: Removing python3-plainbox:i386 rather than change python3:any:i386" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1296629 | |
| === arges` is now known as arges | |
| [16:25] <ScottK> NoNameYet_xnox: nonameyet was already used. | |
| === jamespag` is now known as jamespage | |
| [16:39] <james_w> is there a way to test the 12.04 to 14.04 upgrade using do-release-upgrade? | |
| [16:40] <james_w> now that it's not in development -d doesn't seem to pick it up | |
| [16:40] <james_w> and so it just tries to upgrade to 12.10 | |
| [16:41] <Logan_> james_w: is your 12.04 installation fully updated? | |
| [16:42] <james_w> yeah | |
| [16:42] <Logan_> odd - people have reported being able to upgrade from 12.04 to 14.04 | |
| [16:44] <Laney> james_w: what does Prompt= say in /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades? | |
| [16:44] <Logan_> james_w: edit /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades and set Prompt=lts | |
| [16:44] <james_w> Laney: normal | |
| [16:44] <Logan_> :P | |
| [16:44] <james_w> aha | |
| [16:45] <james_w> that did it, thanks | |
| [16:45] <Laney> enjoy | |
| [16:46] <Logan_> cheers :) | |
| === bfiller is now known as bfiller_afk | |
| === sz0 is now known as sz0` | |
| [16:57] <pitti> slangasek: do you want to target https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/core-1403-systemd-transition at u-series, or for later? | |
| [16:58] <pitti> slangasek: I have some working test packages in a PPA now; I dropped the systemd-services split as it was quite a large change towards Debian and didn't get accepted; and it seems rather unnecessary now | |
| [16:59] <pitti> bdmurray: ack, will do first thing tomorrow; back from holidays now | |
| [17:00] * ogra_ wonders if U is really the cycle for systemd toying, given the phone teams need to build a stable phone release on top of it by summer | |
| [17:03] <SpamapS> I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Firefox is using more memory than it should.. | |
| [17:03] <SpamapS> clint 5542 13.3 80.3 15004536 13098528 ? Dl Apr21 191:15 /usr/lib/firefox/firefox | |
| [17:04] <cjwatson> ogra_: We have to experiment with it before we switch to it, no matter what | |
| [17:05] <cjwatson> And I'd expect "phone still works" to be a blocking criterion | |
| [17:05] <ogra_> cjwatson, yeah, i'm just scared by the default switch, surely not by playing | |
| [17:05] <infinity> The default switch will have to happen eventually too, and we're always trying to ship a stable product. | |
| [17:06] <infinity> So, no room for fear. Just lots of testing before we swap. | |
| [17:06] <ogra_> well | |
| === sz0` is now known as sz0 | |
| [17:06] <ogra_> being the one trying to optimize the boot speed i'm a bit unsure if i want to do all that throw away work :P | |
| [17:06] <infinity> ogra_: Is the intent on the phone really to ship a U snapshot instead of sorting out a clever way to build on top of T? | |
| [17:07] <ogra_> infinity, that would make us end up with gigantic PPAs filled with stuff that has to be maintained in two places | |
| [17:07] <infinity> ogra_: Sure, but a snapshot dead in the middle of a distro cycle is also going to be problematic. | |
| [17:07] <ogra_> i think U should be the base and we fork at some point | |
| [17:08] <ogra_> rather than forking trusty and having to merge back the whole chunk later into U | |
| [17:08] <ogra_> the whole trusty phone images were incredibly stable | |
| [17:09] <ogra_> during the whole cycle ... my worry is if we can retain that stability in a non LTS cycle during development | |
| [17:09] <ogra_> if it would be as stable as trusty was we surely would be fine with U | |
| [17:09] <Unit193> ogra_: I started playing with it in Ubuntu the trusty cycle. :P | |
| [17:10] <ogra_> do you like it ? | |
| === ogasawara_ is now known as ogasawara | |
| [17:11] <Unit193> There are actually a couple benefits to upstart, but shutdown is far faster with systemd. (Bootup is the same though.) | |
| [17:11] <ogra_> is it ? | |
| [17:11] <ogra_> the numbers i have seen systemd was always slower | |
| [17:11] <ogra_> (on bootup that is) | |
| [17:12] <cjwatson> It's going to depend on a bunch of other integration work, either way | |
| [17:12] <ogra_> indeed | |
| [17:12] <Unit193> Updates are still pretty smooth, only times it isn't is when no init script is shipped in the package, and only an upstart job is, like with whoopsie. | |
| [17:12] <cjwatson> e.g. in Debian, minimal systems with upstart vs. systemd, systemd boots significantly quicker (which is no doubt due to missing upstart jobs in various places) | |
| [17:12] <slangasek> pitti: the systemd-services split is still necessary for the time being; we need to be able to land systemd in the archive on an opt-in basis before we make it the default | |
| [17:13] <slangasek> pitti: oh, though I guess installing 'systemd' doesn't change init, so that's probably ok after all | |
| [17:13] <slangasek> pitti: anyway, blueprint targeted, yah | |
| [17:21] <orbisvicis> i've just built my first python-support package for a simple script (arch: all, requires .install file). Is it normal that all files were isntalled to /usr/share/pyshared/ and /usr/lib/python{2.6,2.7}/* is empty ? | |
| [17:25] <orbisvicis> I am backporting a package from dh_python2, which installs to both /usr/share/pyshared/ and /usr/lib/python* (duplicates content from pyshared), which is why I'm asking. Is something missing? | |
| === andyrock-lunch is now known as andyrock | |
| [17:33] <dobey> orbisvicis: backporting to what? 10.04? | |
| [17:33] <dobey> orbisvicis: it is normal with python-support though, yes. the symlinks in /usr/lib/python* are created at install time | |
| [18:04] <orbisvicis> dobey: yes. thanks, now I know, at least, that the symlinks aren't being generated during installation | |
| [18:05] <dobey> orbisvicis: i think dh_python in 14.04 doesn't have the symlinks or pyshared dir at all. | |
| [18:07] <orbisvicis> dobey: backporting to 10.04, most likely the symlinks *should* exist? | |
| [18:08] <dobey> orbisvicis: after installation, they will get created, yes | |
| [18:08] <orbisvicis> well, the package works so I won't bother about it | |
| [18:08] <dobey> that's how pysupport works | |
| [18:09] <dobey> or during installation i guess (depending on how pedantic you want to be about unpacking, postinst, and dpkg triggers) | |
| [18:11] <orbisvicis> dobey: any ideas why they wouldn't have been generated. python-support 1.0.4 ? | |
| === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk | |
| [18:12] <dobey> what do you mean not generated? | |
| [18:12] <dobey> at package build time? or during install? | |
| [18:14] <orbisvicis> dobey: during install | |
| [18:14] <dobey> you installed the package, and it can be imported, right? | |
| [18:15] <orbisvicis> dobey: yep | |
| [18:16] <dobey> orbisvicis: then symlinks must have been created, and i guess you are looking in the wrong place for them :) | |
| [18:16] <orbisvicis> dobey: good enough ;) | |
| [18:16] <orbisvicis> for me | |
| [19:03] <orbisvicis> does cdbs have "upstream" ? | |
| [19:05] <orbisvicis> found t | |
| [19:05] <orbisvicis> *it | |
| [19:11] <Logan_> orbisvicis: upstream is Debian | |
| === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr | |
| === bfiller_afk is now known as bfiller | |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | |